Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAIL VILLAGE FILING 1 BLOCK 5B TRACT A GORE CREEK PLAZA COMMON 2Vp v,rI,T T\ \ rr s K ffij* \ :j!,.w t? Design Review Action Form TOWN OFVAIL Proiect Name: Sweet Basil Project Description: Access lift and window additions Owner, Address and Phone: Charles Rosenquist, Box 6E6, Yail,476-3201 Architect/Contact, Address and Phone: Project Street Address:193 E. Gore Creek Drive Legal Description: A portion of Block 58, Vail Village I't Parcel Number. Comments: Semple Brown Roberts, 1406 Larimer Square, Suite 200, Denver, CO, 303-571-4137 Building Name: Board / Staff Action Action: CONSENTAPPROVEI)Motion by: BILL PIERCE Seconded by: HANS WOLDRICH Vote: 4-0 Conditions: l) The planter wall must be extended to a height 6" above the limits of the lift at its highest point. 2) The lift must be painted charcoal gray. Town Planner: Brent Wilson Date: 4/07/99 r-:'IEIERYON[U)RB\.\PPROVAL99\SWEETBAS. W Pl) DRB Fee Pre-Paid:$20.00 qu.rtio| Culi thc Pi;.r.ning Stali' a'i 4l;9-. r zB APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL CEMRAL INFORMATION This application is for any projcct rcquiring Dcsign Rcvicrv approval. Any project rcquiring design rwiew must rcccive Design Review approval prior to submitting for a building pcrmit. For specific information, see the subruittal rcquircmcnts for thc particular approval that is rcquasted. Thc application cannot be acccptcd until all thc requircd infbrmation is submittcd. Thc projcct may also nccd to bc rcvicwcd by thc Town Council and/or thc Planning and Environmental Cornnrission. Dcsign Review Board approval cxpires orc ycar aftcr final approval unlcss a building permit is issued and construction is started. TOWNOFVAN DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST: B. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LOT:_ BLOCK:_ FILING: PT{YSICAL ADDRESS: PARCEL #' }t0 | -0(,2'l3 - 00lr(Conract Eaglc Co. Assessors Officc at 9?0-328-8640 forparccl #) ZONING: NAME OF OWNER(S): MAILINC ADD C, o E. F. c. owNER(S) STGNATURE(S): NAME OF APPLICANT:v*4 Eas, $50 Includes any addition where square footagc is added to any rcsideutial or conuncrcial building. $20 Lncludes minor changes to buildings and site improvements: such as, reroofing. painting, window additions, landscaping. fences and retaining walls. etc. PHoNE: 4'7 L-3eO/ MAILING ADDRESS: R3 E-C,eeP- 2t, Vqt l. Co a/b{-l PHoNE:47L- o/25 H. TYPEOFREVIEWANDFEE: E Ncw Construction - $200 Construction ofa new buildins. O Addition - Ef Minor Attciation - DRB fces are to be pid at the time of submittal. Latcr. whcn applying for a building pennit. pleasc identi{ thc accuratc valuation ofthe project, Thc Town ofVail will adjust the fce according to the project valuation, PLEASE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION, ALL SUBMITTAL FJQUIREMENTS AND THE FEE TO THE DBPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD, VAIL, COLORADO 81657. t TYPE OF MATERIALI A|F{;r.sEtt s ffig61a\e' ut/ofi 1MfvE. o Roof Siding Othcr Wall Matcrials Fascia Sot'tits ' Windows Window Trinr Doors Door Trirr ' t{and or Dcck Rails Fh,rcs Flaslrings ChinrncyS Trash Enclosurcs Grccnhouscs . Rctaining Walls Exterior Lighting** Other aN^&fre qENe ufraN? + Please specify the nranufacturer's color, number and attach,a small color chip - All extcrior lighting nust nreettheTown's Lighting Ordinance. 18.54.050(J). If cxtcrior lighting is proposed, Vlcase ir.rdicate the nunrbcr of fixhrcs and locations on a scparate lighting plan. .Identi! each fixture fype and provide thc height above grade, lumens outpirt. lunrinous arca, and attach a cut shcct ofthe lighting fixtures. 2 Uodated 6/97 o PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS: EXISTINC TREES TO BE REMOVED: GROLNDCOVER SOD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL Botanical Nanrc * Mininrum rcquircnrcnts for lanrlscaping; Typ" dcciduous trccs - 2 inch calipcr .. conifcrous hccs - 6 fcct in hcight shnrbs - 5 gallons Squarc Footagc Conrnron Namc Ouantity Sizc* T/ NE{r/ Ft,nrllEE__ orHER LANDSCAPE FEll_ul:s !:etai$nswalrs. rences, swimrning pools,'etc.) ptease speciff. Indicate top andbottom clevations of rctaining walls.-Maximt,t h"ight of *.lls within t-hc front set[ack is 3 feet. Maxirnum hcight ofwalls elscwhcrc on the property is 6 fect J Urrdaled 6/97 UTILITY LOCATION VFRIFICATTON ' This form is to vcriff scrvicc availability and location for new construction and should bc uscd in conjunction rvithprcparingyourutilityplanandschcdulinginstallations. Thclocationandavailabilityofutilities.whethct thry bc main trunk lincs.or proposcd lincs. must bc approvcd and vcrificd by thc following utilitics for thc acconrpanying sitc plan. Authorized Signanrre Date U,S. Wcst Communications r-800-922-t 987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Servicc Company 949-5781 Cary Hall Holy Cross Electric Assoc. 949-5892 Tcd Husky/John Boyd T.C.r. 949-5530 Flovd Salaz;rr Eaglb Rivcr Watcr & Sanitation District * 476-74110 Frcd Haslcc * Plcasc bring a sitc plan, floor plan. and clcvations whcn obtaining Uppcr Eaglc Villcy Watcr & Sanitation signnhrrcs. Firc flprv nccds rnust bc addrc.sscd. uoies: I ' Ifthc utility vcrification fornt has signahrrc.s fronr each ofthe utility companies. and no colrltucnts arc rnadc dircctly on thc forrrr. thc Town tvill prcsunrc that thcrc arc no problcms and thc dcvclopnrcnt can procccd. 2' If a utility company has concbms with thc proposcd construction. the utility reprcscntative shall note directly on the utility vcrification form that there is a problcm which needs to be rcsolved- Thc issttc should then bc dctailed in an attached lcttcr to the Town of Vail. However, plcase kccp in mind tbit it is thc rcsponsibility of the utility company and the applicant to rcsolvc identificd oroblems. These verifications do not rclicvc the contractor of thc responsibility to obtain a Public Way Pennit from thc Dcpartment of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utililv locations must be obtained bcforc diseing in any public right-of-way or cascmcnt within thc Town of vail. A building pennit is not a Public Wa.'r permit and nrust bc obained seFratel:r. J. Updaad 5/97 o A prc'npplication confcrcncc rvith Town of vail staff i.s rcquircd. No application can bc acccptcd untcss thcntandatory prc-application:t^"::iTs has bccn conrplctcd. lt is thc applicant's rcsfonsiuility to schcdulc thisrnccting by calling 970-479-Z|ZB. TIME REOUIREMENTS Thc Dcsign Revicrv Board mccts on thc lst and 3rd wcdncsdays of each month. A complctc applicationfotn and all acconrpanving. matcri-ar must bc accqrted by the c'omm;;6 ;;;il;ent Dqrartmeni antinir'um of thrcc and a harf (3 r/2) wecks prior to thc date of thc DRB pubric hcaring.:. REVIEW CRITERIA Yotrr proposal will be rcviewcd for conrpliancc with thc Dcsign Guidelines as sct forth in Section 1g.54 of theMuuicipal Codc. NOTE TO ALL APPLTCANTS: A' If a propcrty is locatcd in a mappcd hazard arca (i.c. snow avalanchc, rockfall. floodplain. dcbrisflow. lvctland, ctc)' a hazard study nrust bc submittcd and thc owncr must sigl an aftidavitrccognizing thc hazard rcport prior to thc issuancc of a building permit. 'Applicants are cncouragcd' to chcck with thc planning stafl'prior to subrrrittal of a DRB appiication to dctcrminc thc.relationship . ofthc propcrty to ull nrappcd haz;rrds. B' Basic Plan shcct Fornrat, For all survcys, sitc plnns, liurdscape plans and othcr sitc improvcrncqtsplarrs, all of thc following nlrst bc shown, l ' Plan shcct sizc ntust bc 24"x 36". For largc project.s. largcr plan sizc may bc allowcd.2. Scalc. Thc minimunr scare is t "=20', Alr pranJnrust uc at tirc sanrc scarc.3. Craphic bar scalc.4. North arrorv. 5. Titlc block. projcct narni, projcct addrcss and lcgal dcscription.(r. Indication of plan prcparcr. add.rcss and phonc uunrbcr. . ' . ,7. Datcs of original plau prcparation and all rcvision datcs.It. Vicinity nrap or location maJi at a scalc of I ,,= I,000, or larger.9. Shcct labcl.s and nunrbcis. | 0 . A bordcr with a mininrum lcft side rnargin of 1.5,,. I I. Namcs ofall adjaccnt roadways,12. Plan legcnd, For new construction and additions, the applicant must stake and tape the project site to indicatepropcrly lincs. proposed buildings and building comers. All trees to be rcmoved must be taped. Theapplicant must ensurc that staking donc during thc winter is not buried uv rnor. iu sitc tapingsand staking must be completcil prior to thc day of the DRB meeting.,: '- A'pplicaflts who fail to appear before the Design Revicw Board on their schcdulcd mctting date andrvho havc not asked in advance that discussion on their itenr be postponed will have thcir items\|, yrrrt rtavl; utt; , ll(illlsremoved from thc DRB agcnda untir such tinre as the item has been rcpubiished. E' Ifthe DRB approvcs the application with conditions or modifications, aliconditions ofapprovalmust be rcsolvcd pugl to the issuance of a buitding pcrmit. o II. I II. N. C. D. Updared,6197 l.-' " v. o STAFF APPROVAL The Administrator may review and approve Desigr Rwiew applications. approve with cerrain modifications. deny the application. or rnay rcfer the application to thc Design Review Board for decision. All staff approvals are subject to final approval by the DRB. The following types of Desigr Review applications may be staffapproved: A. Any application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent with the architectural design. rnaterials and colors of the building. and approval has been received by an authorized member ofa' condoruiniumassociation.ifapplicablc: B. Any application to nrodifo an existing building that does not significantly change the exising planes of the building and is generally consistent with thc architechrral dcsigrr. materials and colors ofthe building. including. but not limited to exterior building finish materials (e.g. stonework siding roof rnaterials. paint or stain.), exterior lighting. canopics or awnings. fence& antennas. satellite dishes. rvindows. skylighs. siding. minor cornnrercial facadc improvcncnts. and other similar modifications: C. Any application for site improvements or modifications including. but not limited to, driveway rnodifications. site grading. site walls. removal or modifications to existing landscaping, installation of accessory stmctures or recreational facilities. ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND FEES A. Ifthis application requires a separate review by any local. state or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail. the application f'ee shall be increased by $200.00. Examples of such review. may includc. but are not limited to: Colorado Dcpartmcnt of Highway Access Permits. Army Corps of Enginecrs 404. etc. B. The applicant shall be responsible for paying any publishing fecs which are in excess of50% ofthe application fee. If. at the applicant's request. any mattcr is postponed for hearin& causing the matter to be re-published. then the entire fce for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant. C. Applications dcemed by the Commturity Dwcloprnent Department to have design. land usc or other. isbucs which may have a sigrificant impact on the communify may require review by consulane in addition to Town staff.. Should a determination be made by tbe Town staffthat an outside consultant is needcd, the Community Dcvelopment Departncnt may hire thc consultant. The Departncnt shall cstimate the amount of money necessary to pay thc consultant and this amount ishall be forwarded to the Town by the applicant at the time of filing an application. Expenses incurred by the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by the application shall bc paid to the Town by the applicmt within 30 days of notification by the Town. Any excess frmds will bc retumed to the applicant upon review completion. vt. Updated 6/97 PROJECT DIRECTORY OANER.KEVIN CLAIRE 5'^{EET E.ASIL REgTAURANT R3 EA3T OORE CREEK PRIVE vAtL, co ab51 PHONE, q10.416.Ot2' FAX, q10.416.Ot?1 gEMPLE BROI4N ROBERTg ARCHIIECTS 1406 LARwER SAUARE. 9Ut-tE 200 DENVER, CO bO2O2 PHONE, 303.51t.41?1 FAx, 303.51t.0403 9PE6TRUM GENERAL cONTRACTORS 5135 E.3ATH. AVE. DENVER, CO bO2O1 PHONE, 30332q.bOO3 FAX, 30332q.OO32 MONROE NEI^{ELL P.O. BOX Eq1 AVON, CO Ab20 PHONE, q10.q4q.11bb FAX, q1 .q44.4054 BELFAY EN6INEERIN6 2AII A. qTH. AVENUE DENVER, CO bO2O4 PHONE, ?O3.bq2.>qbo FAX, ?O3.Oq2.5q1q AR.6HITECT. cONTRACTOR, gTRUCTURAL, VECH/ ELEC. SEMPLE BROI/VN ROBERTS urvalrHoszEo usa of rHEsc oocuyEf{Ts ts rarrEo nrHoul IHF tRrflEN coNSENt 0f: SWEET BASIL 193 \,/A I L EAST GORE CREET< DRIVE COLOR AI) O A1 6 5-7, PROJEST I{O. DATE 205000 09/30/98 CHECKED SSB DRAIIN SHEET T]TLE COVER SHEET """* ""A1.1 gI^{EET BAgIL REgTAURANT ERIDOE STREET COVERED BRIDOE VI.',INITY MAP SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS SWEET BASIL 195 EAST GORE CREEK DRIVE \,/AIL COLORADO A1 6 5-7, ANY UiTAUIHOR]ZEo lSE OF rHESE 00C!t EI{TS tS PROHIAIIED WIIXOUT TI.]F $IR]TT!N CONSENT OFI PROJECT NO. DATE 205000 09/30/98 OnAWN CHECXED ssB SHIf,T T]TL,E VICINITY MAP 42.1 CVT CU?B FOR NE}^I RAMP (E) coNc. 5TEP9 W BRI6K FAVERS NEI^,I AROUeHT IRON RAILINo TO T4AT.-IH EXIgTIN6T oz NEI^{ STONE Y^IALL, MAT6H (E) RE-U5E (E) gTONE NEI^{ PLATFORM LIFT BY ACCE35 \-IODEL fiPL-TO 3b, X 48'PLATFRM NEI^,I I^IROUeHT IRON RAILINo TO MATCH EXI9TIN6 (a DooRg E) CONC. 9TEP9 A/ EIRI.*,< PAVERS NEA STONE PLANTER, MATCH (E) EXISTINo E)cuRE-\ (E) D2OR \_ EXrsrN' RArLrN. EXIgTIN6 PATIO FLOOR PLAN NORTH 3/lb"=l'-O" I.12 RAMP +ffir";,Y SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS SWEET BASIL 193 EAST GORE CREEK DRIVE \,/AIL COLOFRADO A1 6 5-7' IINAUINOR ZlD US€ OF IHEST OOCUMENIS IS €|lEO V{]HoUI THe URrmN dlNSft{T OF: PROJECT NO. DATE 205000 0s/30/98 CHECXED SSB DRAXN SHEET TITLE FLOOR P[,AN 42.2 {es 6iE tKq st$$p sq; lt;3!i[ s $p ) 11 X 3ni6fr A -lt froz { rTtt- rn I oz SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS SWEET BASIL 193 trAST GORE CREEK DRIWE \,/AIL COLORADO 8165-7, usE o. tH€sE DocuMaNTs rs 5: PROJECT NO. DATE 20s000 o9/3o/98 DRAWN cRc CHECKED SSB SHEET TITLE ELEVATION 43.1 4rnbfi r,Eu.lflAlrIER - ulw urt 7 ottFQ6tII PERg?ECTIVE SWEET BASIL 193 EAST GORE CREEK DRIVE \/AIL COLOF?ADO A1 65-7' PROJECT NO. DATE 205000 09/30/eE IANT UN^UTHORIZED US€ Of T'SE OOOJT€NTS !S lmo{&rED $DcNrr :t]E nRrlr€ coNsaxT oF:. .'"n.*o..*"-,"u o*"1 trre{ -F' r:\q,<{" st; G 1r. xi_-.t\ a',rt.A.'brx- NEW AtpEKSBN wNnw9 G'*h \5 I ,A1arr. .: 5q 5rS PERSP SEMPLE BROWN ROBERTS SWEET BASIL 193 trAST GORE CREEK \/AIL COLORAT)O 8-1 f-\ D | \,/E_ l.t-ffii1'fi.H?'o *, o' 'rEsE Doc,,Mr{rs ,s | ryqtqEq _!!H^o!,1_I!i $qrrN coNsExr oF: o 7fi0s of KEel"A4E6rrf KfnF. elEVfrlllN ( peu wuoout.) n YlttToo Fl\,I'T 0f Raqzq,rn61';-l ELEU6IIa.| ( lrEt,uttfT Locr<nntt) PENALW FOR PfiVATE u8E, t300 ft Inr s.nder,! nrme, addrcas, ".d ztp cff {,lt$e"f h|l$ flfl$nY Frhr Ft' rsn . ddlt.r.nd ZIP Cod.h tha t[oa DabYr,. eomC lrn| t, :L 3. md 4 on rh.rlvrtll.. A tdr to fto|tr ol |rdcb t n crtir tr. otharrbc dft( to b.ol ofrd04.. Etdofta rtlob "natrm RcG.lDtna$ntad" dlac.nr 1o rntar. vAfl.,co st657 t 3=Jl3-*T, complore items 1 tnd 2 Put vour addr€ss in tho "RETUI card fromboin0 rgturngd to you, to 6nd th€ dato ol dslivery. Fo. r TO" Space toaleas srxI-ffiFEoxLs) for oddltionsl 8€rvice(sl1. tr Show to whom delivorrd. dalo, snd addros: (Enm chane) glwlcoa aro dasired, and comDlota il Failuro io do this will prevont E Restrict€d Dslivgry(fumcluw)2. 3. Anicla Addrsss€d to: MR. TOM ARI'{STRONG BLUIS BEANERY 193 GORE CREEK DRIVE vArL, co 81657 4. Article Nuftbal P 156 091 537 Typ6 of Servicg: E Registcroa fl Inaurud E[ c"ruri"a ! coo E Expresa Mair ! F"".*ff:.8f3:kl" Alwly! obtlln slgnrtur€ ol rddrelao6 or lgrnt and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Signature - Address x Addr€sseo'g Addres8 (ONlf It ngcstd otd lca pdd) 8. '' o"'i",oti",Y^t \J Ps Forn 38 | I . r"t&. Des r us.ep.o. i968-ztz-8g5 DomEsrtc BETURI| REGEIPT TOWNOFVAIL a c 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303 -479-2 I 38 / 479-2 t 39 FAX 303-479-2452 November 16, 1993 Deparunent of Cotntnuniry Development Mr. Tom Armstrong Blu's Beanery 193 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RE: Landscape improvements for 1992 approval for Blu's Dear Tom: In late October we discussed the incomplete landscape improvements for the 1992 approval ot tne etu's project. At this time, you iniicated that you would get a plan to me for the relandscaping of the area to the west of your business in early November. I have not received iny-information and would like tb continue to proceed with the project' At this time' your options would be to either pay $600.00 into the Town of Vail Landscaping Fund which would'be used for the imprOvements adjacent to your business on Gore Creek Promenade or you can submit a plan wiin the intention of completing the project within.a reasonable amount of tirn". Another option available to you would be to return to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PECj and ask that this condition of approval be removed from the project' please contact me as soon as possible as I would like to have a resolution to this issue by December 1st of this year. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 479-2138' xc:Kristan PriE Erich Hill, Paradigm Design ly Mel .TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development June 14, 1993 P?r* kit^ '\r/5w<!+ p^*i t ^- eg"r(9ar* ffL{H o Update on Sweet Basil's deck construction located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/part of Block 58, Vail Village lst Filing. Applicant: Planner: Kevin Clair Shelly Mello The staff felt that it was important to update the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) on the status of the Sweet Basil's deck located at 193 Gore Creek Drive. As proposed, the deck was lo be 2 feet above the existing street grade of Gore Creek Drive. As constructed, the deck is approximately 3 feet 4 inches above the street grade. The applicant feels that this is due to a lack of information on the street grade available to him at the time of the design and review. The staff finds that the modification is acceptable, although we would have preferred the original height of 2 feet. _w___ $-v'rlrn "-- oo ':l I t ,rtL r 00F r .The PEC felt that it would be okay to leave "public and private golf, tennis, etc." as a Conditional Use. .The PEC felt that "enclosed recreation'should be deleted. .The PEC felt that "plant and tree nurseries'should either be deleted or reworded to remove the word "retail'- .With regard to 'ski lifts and tows...", the PEC felt that the wording "and related underground ski base facilities and 'ski runs" could be added here. .Joe Macy stated that he would like to see wording added to the Conditional Use section to allow for "underground ski base facilities". Accessory Uses .Conceming ltem A, Jetf Bowen mentioned that we should consider removing the word 'customarily" or leave it in because that is a standard statement but it should be moved to the bottom of this section. .Concerning ltem C, the PEC would like to see the word "conditional- added or this item deleted entirely because ltem E says the same thing. .Concerning ltem D, the PEC wondered if "horse grazing" was really needed because it is addressed in supplemental regulations. Lot Area .Jeff Bowen wanted Town staff to review the list of Permitted and Conditional Uses to determine if it is realistic lo have these uses on lots that are 5,000 square feet in size. .The PEC felt that this section did not address the concept of "lot size creation". Jim Curnutte stated that prior to the next work session with the PEC, staff would complete a map showing what the elfected properties are currently zoned, including those that are currently zoned Public Use. He said that this map would include numbers that correspond to the property owner list, which will include the size of each lot. 1 1. Update on Sweet Basil's deck construction located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/part of Block 58, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Ned GwathmeyPlanner: Shelly Mello Shelly Mello explained to the PEC that this item needed to be tabled until the next meeting because the applicant was presently out of town. Jeff Bowen then made a Plannlng and Envlronmental Commlsslon llay 24, 1993 11 motion to table this item untilJune 14, 1993 with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A unanimous 6-0 vote tabled this item untilJune 14, 1993. 12. A request for a modilication to PEC conditions of approval for the revised development plan for Vail PoinU1881 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 1, Block 3, Lionsridge Filing No. 3. 13. Applicant: Planner:TABLED UNTIL JUNE 14, 1993 Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item untilJune 14, '1993 with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A unanimous 6-0 vote tabled lhis item until June 14, 1993. A request for a proposed SDD and minor subdivision to allow for the development of single family homes located on Tracts A and B, The Valley, Phase ll/1480 Buffer Creek Rd. Applicant: Planner: Steve Gensler/Parkwood Realty Andy Knudtsen TABLED UNTIL JUNE 14, 1993 Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item untilJune 14, 1993 with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A unanimous 6-0 vote tabled this item until June 14, 1993. A request for a wall height variance for a property located at 3130 Booth Falls CourVLot 6, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing Applicant: Planner: Steve Gensler Andy Knudtsen Johann Mueller Shelly Mello Town of Vail Andy Knudtsen 14. 15. Applicant: Planner:TABLED UNTIL JULY 12, 1993 Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item untilJuly 12, 1993 with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A unanimous 6-0 vote tabled this item until July 12, 1993. A request for a conditional use permit, a paving variance to allow for a gravel access road and the cemetery master plan and management plan for the proposed design of the Vail Cemetery to be located in the upper bench of Donovan Park generally located west of the Glen Lyon suMivision and southeast of the Matterhorn neighborhood. TABLED INDEFINITELY Jeff Bowen made a motion to table this item indefinitely with Greg Amsden seconding the motion. A unanimous 6-0 vote tabled this item indefinitely. Plannlng and Envlronmenlal Comm lsslon May 24, 1993 12 I Project Application Proiect Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner. Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Com ments: Design Review Board Date Motaon by: Seconded by: -{'fr;;i-\....-*-*----.D ISA PPR OVAL Summary:/ ,,l, iitirrr k'\,t(+ o^," 6...,.1_|i4r4"* (_r., , I t\ ,-1 _, , Staff Approval '/hrfuh Stfuarichcolors to complement any decor. The understated elegance of the RD Series v,'ill fit perfectly in your reception area, hallway or any location that requires the posting of information. The RD Series radius design features smoothlv rounded edges and corners to give that contemporary look which appeals to the most discriminating eye. Available in a choice of colors popular among todav's top designcrs. LETTERBOARI)NATURAL CORKBOARD RD SER.M,S c"". dirr,..,"io,3' (5.08cm) exterior depth, I 34', (86.36( _1 [*,*ltrl 4 .h "rf Pacl Product Selec.tion Franrre Colors Available in four durable matte finishes-/ri-i(.bbc\burg:undy, warm brown and slate gray. C.orkboa.rds Rich, textured fabrics in fr3$:burgundy and lan comolement th" F.onl" collr ot'- your cnorcc, I-,etterboards Soft color felt background to enhance your rnessage board. Camel, gray and black coordinated to vour choice of frame color. Natural Corkboards One Door 24"W x 34"H (60.96cm x 86.36cm) Hodelilumber Frame Colg. 7711-10 Black7712-10 Burgundy 7713-10 Warm Brown 7714-10 Slate Gray Ctn. Wt. 23 lbs. (10.43ks) Two Door 47"W x 34"H (l l9.38cm x 86.36cm) ModclNumbcr Frame Color7721-10 Black 7722-10 Burgundy7723-10 Warm Brown 7724-10 Slate Gray Ctn. Wt. 46 lbs. (20.87ks) DavS()l!' na$a, lllino'3 US460143 . Limited 5 Year Warrangr. Frames are constructed of high qualiry alurninum with cast zinc radius corners. o l.ockable doors are made of shatter resislant acrvlic. 'lbo keys prolrided. I Easy to install. I ntegrated hanger pcrmits either permancnt or temporary mounling. r Changeable letterboards corne with 3 l8 white 5/4rl Helvetica sgrle letters, numbcrs and sSrmbols. Optional letter sizes are also available. o Ships via UPS. o RD SERTES) interior depth. one per carton. Slate GraY EEE- - EEE Natural Cork Vrlfm Brcw'l w Tann - - Gray I Burgundyffi Lt. Burgundy -- m - TN:mfnrr-t- C!mel He+I thck nip."- A Fubbermaid company @ , . 1992 Rubbermij Olfrce Ptoductacrap tm Ottrcss In lo.onlo . lodon . To*yo . Syd.ey . Paris . Franktun RDS 30792 'il .4g^-1ffi- 61to Fabric Covered Corkboards One Door 24"W x 34"H {60.96cm x 86.36cmi ilodel urgundy7713-20 Warm Brown Tan 7714-20 Slate Gray Gray Ctn. Wl. 23 lbs. (10 43ks) Two Door 47'W r 34"H (119.38cm x 86.36cm) Hod.lNumbsr Fram€ Color Fabrb Color7721-20 Black Gray7722-20 Burgundy Lt. Burgundy7723-20 Warm Brown Tan 7724-20 Slate cray Gray Ctn. M. 46 lbs. (20.87ks) Letterboards One Door 24"W x 34"H (60.96cm x 86.36cm) ModelNumber Framo Color Felt Color 7711-30 Black Black7712-30 Burgundy Black 7713-30 \ /arm Brown Camel7714-30 Slate Gray Gray Ctn. Wt. 27 lbs. (12.2sks) Tvuo Door 47"W x 34"H (119-38cm x 86.36cm) ModelNumbor FrameCobr Feli Color 7721-30 Black Black 7722-30 Burgundy Black7723-30 Warm Brown Camel 7724-30 Slate Gray Gray Cln. wt. 49 lbs. (?2.23ks) Cvl-...- r, Tbi1 I EUH UIGNsi UAIL P. E= ut&recu staus Quality at Budget prjces .' FII til-l X 3Lt " tl I DE . lli Stl[.JA!:ll'r F I.:H:l T01"A[" : Bl.Ail'i ANODIZEI) Al..l"fl.lINLjf"l UAS]E t4ITH [:'INItiFtfiil BAC|'; IJHAT'TER PRSI.IF FAilE ffiREY FF.L]- HAfiKISfIOI.JND [VF:R (:ilIT.F.] INfiiF: NN LHF']' $IDH uN itI{:rH]" $It}u t- t- IJM I f''lAT [:n [,'i I'f F.l F L URfilSfi i.i:N'l r rul gttniO I Frxr-ul{,fi" NOT vIslFL[i FRO[4 Utjl'sIDff {;Al]E: 3S9949"+€.?E JL't'lE 8 r 19?5 F:l:t{llulI t.,/It{RY A$-f RH: liWh.i':I tlA$Il- lip !1fl :[ F 1, ilA l', r flN$i e cl't T lii' , -J I'lAl'[-.R I A []-t Fll!R r P.o. Box 2688, Eagle / vail, co-81658 r pl6duqltion ce.ter; gr0Nottingharn Rcr.. s-2, Ar'.rr, co gj62t.)S*rru*it courlries: 303.949-4s65 :- Alpen j cilnii."a snrings: 3LB.9au-r*t.5 H I !:HTE[:H If I I=I.]]= ",'Fr I L =!:r='l+=.+i:,fl:1 black anodized finishes aclclltiohal cost,) Optional : Featur€s .. lleadpf sectlort .. clouble. dqcirs. slidirtg glass door.s .:,..L Proiect'Name: \ '- Proiect Descriotion: Contact Person and Phone Project Application Owner. Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lo { rt, Zone - Comments: Design Review Board Date Motion by: Seconded by: APPROVAL DISAPPROVAL \Q statr Approval 0 ,,r r i o L,i^b l+ nl^t:p !.vv:.l,,.pw+p , {. + 4t -% o.21w -f+ + vL \.:rr tf-e e, n rtrl '*kn. ovr ltfi/\ 85'l?,, 19?g r1r 0C +tlrthrtp Vryrps h F. :r,' nr ! tt..5€ hu I d t FISA^ {pL+ af fuhoe Q o|+n-- 45t a (?lar&-*cr*ifsirl r? fr ,,_EiH', ^- Itl+'{+" T+ ,/ (e'ra't'Pi / "9 3.. llrfirsfu (rnot+tt,3 (en d-=F6T?o^J €$rs., fht r- a1' [' +? Fxr*,--a '+r'di-i.rb^+ . fua C*al- flzz-> +r^tp-t Fr+'| D.4*€&€4, AJ-tl+"; OATE! E/ nlqry SI.{EET NO, fiuu or',. 2 y TOWNOFVAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 so3-479-2 I 38 / 479-2 1 39 FAX 303-479-2452 January 7,1994 Department of Community Deve lopment Mr. Tom Armstrong Blu's Bestaurant 193 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RE: Landscape improvements for 1992 Dear Tom: In early December, I received a copy of a cost estimate to complete the landscape improvements for your 1992 approvil. Upon receipt, I contacted you and requested a letter of intent that indicated that the work would be done by May 15' 1994. At this writing, I have not received this letter of intent and must explain that if the letter is not received by Friday, January 14, 1994, our department will have no choice but to cite you for noncompliince with your nanning Commission approval and the Town ol Vail Zoning Code. We wish to work in a cooperative manner with you, however, the Planning Commission relies on us to insure the projects are completed per the approved plan. Should you have any questions, please contact myself or Kristan Pritz at 479-2139. Thanks lor giving your attention to this matter. Sincerely, aSVt'aC,4 Nfi-tl" Shelly Mello I Town Planner xc: Kristan Pritz items I and/or 2 tor additionol soruic.s. hom6 3, and 4a & b. 4b. Ssrvice Type E Registered YCertified E Express Mail 7. Date of I also wish to receive services (for an tes): 1. n Addressee's Address 2. ! Restricted DeliverY Consult for f€s. [Fq the extra reougatsdo your name and addresg on tho revlltd o{ lhis lorm ii tha we can do€a not ponnit. . Writo "Retum F6c€iDt Requegted" on thdrtalfiiEce b€low lhs anicle number . Th€ Return R€c€ipt Fge will provide you the signaturc oJ the p€lson lo and lho date of 3. Article Addressed to:4s. Articlo Qq3erc Dre, E tc'oz E Insured tr coo Tl Return Roceipt for -4 !48 TC|t4 A,va'fS-ar-_ .gus R€SrAu.lzlvuT Lqs GcF V+tu, @ 5. Signature (Addressee)Addresse€'s Address and fes is paid) 6. Signature PS Form , Novomber 1 *u.s.cPo:teo1-287-(xtr DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT UITIITED STATES POSTAI SERVICE Ofl'rcial Buslnesc PENALW FOR PRIVATE usE, 9300 Rr0'D,tAN ? s 19q4 Print your name, address and ZIP Code here *ffig;;l ,- S.4 F 883 60e 511 75 South Frontage Rod Vail, Colorado 81657 fltfrD.16X Zl lfrt I.{R. TOM ARMSTRONG BLUIS RESTAURANT 193 GORX CREEK DRIVE vArL, c0 81657 o 'Wifrtr, t Project Application erolect t,tame: H Proiect Description: Contact Person and Phone Owner. Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot B lock i:t riring V'-l ,(" Comments: Board Date DISAPPROVAL ...,i. l_\L tl(- Summary:L-, ,ir-'l e.L-...,- Town Plan ner E stati Approval PARADICM DESICN August t7, L994 Russell Forrest and Paul Reeves Comrnunity Development Department Town of Vail 75 south Frontage RoadVai1, Colorado 8L657 Dear Sirs: This letter is to confirn the phone conversations we had concerning the grease storage building at the Gore creek Plaza building. The project construction date will be postponed until Spring 1995. The reasons are that most building contractors are to busy to look at the project. We received on bid that was too costly and the construction Louta not begin until October. That could cause a problen with the Thanksgiving holiday. We believe that construction next Spring will be more cost effective and the tirning will work better for all concerned. As I stated in the phone conversation on July 27 | L995, You and Paul witt rneet with Torn Armstrong and Kevin Clair to work out a schedule of cleaning the area until the project is conpleted next Spring. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration. Erich Hill, Architect cc: Tom Arrnstrong and Kevin clair ARCHITECTURE SCULPTURE INTERIORS Sincerely, 835 INCA PARKWAY BOULDER, COLORADO 80303 303-499-42s2 iltgn Review Action Flt" TOWN OF VAIL category Nu-ag*4' ller', L*,, , Date Project Name: 5-azpc / Building Name: ProfectDescription: (t,,,s*t,c /- L+us'r nc ilt (tnt /t.,rc 7 71.,t',*,/t.,r,,lslpr'r '' ',] Owner,Address andPhone'. /trr,,n i'/tt:r / ar.w *r ff'rcr q /'?7 lir're (. /e, y'. ,)/2 ? ,. -'r, 'f ,/ -"1 ,- - 1;-( - lll i or ,i''/ ..'t)( (frr./. c:t-,,rr- r"i,ar,',,: ),se,, lury' B,*.ht(t, t, ,/ ) Archirecvcontact,Addressandphone: {r,cl ,M /l -/nro/,i;r^ /lp rg t^ , ltt: f,rr, 7l t , *' ,r--t / ^r^* t-t 4'L!1I Legal Description: Lot /ZoneDistrict (( J ')q r'.rt ai ou,t;,QfProject Street Address: Comments: Board / Statt Action Motion by:Vote: Seconded by: D Approval I Disapproval fr(statepprovat tlar o/ , a{nr6e .<:-) Town Planner rtat/ ntfi/ DRB Fee Pre-paid I revised nlfr{f, cor,oRADo t'o FEB I I Bgi I. DRB APPI..ICAITON - IOI{N O8 VAII., DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED : DATE OF DRB MEETING: ********** TEIS .EPPLICAIION WII,L NOT BE ACCEPTEDrrNrrl, AI.L REQUr*:* *r*XO*T'I['JION rS SUBI,{r!TED PRO,JECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRTPTION: (9200.00)Minor ALteration ($20.00) X Addition ($50.00)Conceptual Review ($0) C. ADDRESS: D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B'ock iL".t-a+ STi Subdivision tlr.rt Urltlltro- l5r Filr!3 If propert.y is described by a meets and bounds legfaldescription, please provide on a separate sheet andattach to this application. ZONING: Co *vrara.-[ Coc- I B.TYPE OF REVIEW: New Construction E. E' G. LOT AREA: If required, applicant stamped survey showing Lot area. Ke.lL C to'i- NAME OFMailing APPLICANT: Address: Phone I.NAME OF Condoninlum Approval if applicable. DRB FEEs DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe tlme of submittal of DRB apptication. Liter, whenapplying for a building pernit, please identify theaccurate valuat.ion of the proposal. The Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the table below, toensure the correct fee is paid. ,t. K. FEE SCHEDULE: VALUATION0 - $ 10,000 $10,001 -$ 50,000. $ 50,001 - $ L50,000 s150r001 - $ 500,000 $500r 001 - $1,000,000$ over $1,000,000 FEE $ 20.00c qn nn $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 9500.00 2lt8lq+ Phone 41t"-b3n1 *SIGITATURE (S) :Mailing Address: (+rq533glJ * DESIGT{ R.EVIEW BOARD E^PPROVAL EXPIRES ONE YE"AR AE'TER FINAI IPPROVAI uNIJEss A BUIT,DING PERMIT Is IssuED AIID coNslRuclloN Is STARTED. **NO APPI.ICATTON WILL BE PROCESSED WTTEOUT OWNER'S SIGITATI'RE 1* 1 o o rT. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING: A pre-application meeting with a member of the planningstaff is strongly encouragred to determine if any additionalapplication information is needed. It is the applicanttsresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff todetermine if there are additional submittal reguirements.Please note. that a COMPLETE application wilI streamline theapproval process for your project. II]. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THE DRB: A. In addition to meeting submittal requirements, theapplicant must stake ind tape the pioject site toindicate property lines, building lines and buildingcorners. AII trees to be removed must be taped. Allsite tapings and staking must be completed prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that, staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. B. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS norma1J.y reguires tr,\ro separate meetings of the Design Review Board: aconceptual approval and a final approval . Applicantsshould plan on.presenting their development proposal ata minimum of tero..meetings before obtaining finalapproval . C. Applicants who fail to appear before the Design ReviewBoard on their scheduled meeting date and who have notasked in advance that discusslon on t.heir item bepostponed, will have t.heir items removed from the DRBdocket until such time as the item has beenrepublished. D. The following items may, at the discretion of thezoning administrator, be approved by the CommunityDevelopment Department staff (i.e. a formal hearingbefore the DRB may not be reguired): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changeswhich do not alter the existing plane of thebuilding,. and b. Buildinq addition proposals not visible from anyother lot or public space. At the time such aproposal is subnitted, applicants must Lncludeletters from adJacent property owners and,/or fronthe agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association stating the associationapproves of the addition. E. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,vretland, etc) r a hazard study nust be submitted and theowner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazardreport prlor. to the issuance of a building permit.Applicants are encouraged to check with a-T-own plannerprior to DRB application to determine the relationshipof the property to all mapped hazards. F. For all resldentlal construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the insideface of the exterior structuraL walls of thebuilding; andb. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan a. four foot distance from the exterior facL of thebuilding walls or supporting columns. If DRB approves the application with conditions ormodifications, a1l conditions of approval must beresolved prior to Town issuance of a building permit. G. .o*r**u.il*IV. A.Three copies of a recent topoqraphic survea licensed survevor, aton which the followinq 1. Lot area. 2. Two foot contour intervals unless the parcelconsists of 6 acres or more, in which Case, S,contour intervals may be accepted. a scale of L" = 20, orinfornation is provided: ?Eltistingr trees or groups of trees having trunksr^rith diameters of 4tr or more, as measured from apoint one foot above grade. Rock outcroppings and other significant naturalfeat.ures (Iarge boulders, intermittent streams,etc. ) . Hazard areas (aval.anche, rockfall, etc.),centerline of stream or creek, required creek orstream setback, 1-00-year flood plain and slopes of40* or more, if applicable. Ties to existing benchmark, eiLher USGS landrnarkor sewer invert. This infornation should beclearly stat.ed on the survey so t.hat allmeasurements are based on the same starting point.This is particularly inportant for heightmeasurements. See Policy On Survey Information,for more information regarding surveys. Locations of the following:a. Size and type of drainage culvert,s, swales,etc. must. be shown. b. Exact locat.ion of existing utility sourcesand proposed service lines from their sourceto the structure. Utilities to include: 6. Cable TV Telephone Sewer Water GasElectric 9. Slt,e P1agB. 1. c. Show all utility meLer locations, includingany pedest.als to be located on sit.e or in theright-of-way adjacent to the site. RevocabLepermits from the Town of Vail are requiredfor improvements in the right-of-way. d. Property lines - distances and bearings and abasis of bearing must be shown. e. A11 easenents (Title report must also includeexisting easement localions) Existing and finished grades. Provide spot elevations of the street, and a minimum of one spot elevat.ion on either side ofthe 1ot, 25 feet out from the side property tines. Locations of the following: a. Proposed surface drainage on and off site. b. Proposed driveways. Percent slope and spotelevations must be shown. ALl exist.ing improvements including structures,landscaped areas, service areas, storage areas,walks, driveways, off-street parking, loadingareas, retaining walls (with top and bottom ofhrall spot elevations), and ot.her existing site improvements. Iarger, 3. c. and proposed grades shown underneath). These elevations and grades must be provided in orderfor the staff to determine building height. AIIridge lines should be indicated on the site plan. Elewations for roof ridges shall also be indicated on the site plan with corresponding finished andexisting grade elevatlons. 4. Driveway grades may not exceed 8t unless approved by the Town Engineer. Landscape Plan (lrr = !Q' or larger) - 3 copies required 1. The following information must be provided on the landscape plan. The location of existing 4" diameter or larger trees, the location, size, spacing and type (common and latin name) of allexisting and proposed plant material . All- treesto be saved and to be removed must also beindicated. The plan must also differentiate between existing and proposed vegetation. 2. Complet.e the attached landscape materials list. 3. The location and type of existing and proposed watering systems to be enployed in caring forplant material following its installation. 4. Existing and proposed contour lines. In order to clarify the inter-relation of the various developmenl proposal components, please incorporate as much of the above information as possible onto the siteplan. Siqn off frorn each utilitv companv verifying thelocation of utility service and availabillty (see attached) . A preliminary title report must accompany a1Isubmittals, to insure property ownership and locationof alL easements on property. ArchitecturaL Plans (l/8" = lt or larger, !/4" lspreferred scale for review) 3 copies required. 1. Scaled floor plans and all elevations of the proposed development. Elevations must show bothexisting and finished grades. 2. One set of floor plans must be 'rred-lined" to show how the gross residential fl-oor area (GRFA) wascalculated. 3. Reductions of all eLevations and the site plan (8-L/2" x !l"l for inclusion in PEC and,/or TownCouncif memos may be reguested. 4. Exterior surfacing rnaterials and material colorsshall be specified on the at.tached materials list.This materials list must be completed andsubmitted as a part of DRB application. ColorchLps, siding samples etc., should be presented tothe Design Review Board meeting. ?one check list (att.ached) nust be completed if project NOTE: D. is located within the Single-Family,or Duplex zone districts.Prirnary./Secondary Photos of the existing site and where applicable, ofadjacent structures. v. trre zonif Administrator and/or DRB ly r"qrire thesubmission of additional p1ans, drawings,specifications, samples and other mateiials (includinga model) if deened necessary to determine whether aproject wiII comply with Design Guidelines. Photos or sketches which clearly convey the redevelopmentproposal and the location (site plan) of the redevelopmentproposal may be subrnitted in Lieu of the more formalrequirements set forth above, provided all importantspecifications for the proposal including colors andmaterials to be used are submitted. VI . ADDITTONS - RESTDENTTAL OR COMMERCTAL A. Original floor plans with all specificat,ions shown. Thlee sets of proposed floor plans L/Br = L, or larger(L/A't = Lr is preferred) C. Three copies of a site plan showing existing andproposed construction. Indicate roof ridge elevationswith existing and proposed grades shown underneath. D. ELevations of proposed addition. E. Photos of the existing structure. F. specifications for alr materials and coror samples onmaterials list (attached). At the request of the zoning Administrator you nay arso berequired to submit: G. A statement fron each utility verifying l_ocation ofservice and availability. See attached utilitylocation verification form. H. A site improvement survey, stamped by registeredprofessional surveyor. I. A preliminary title report, to verify ownership ofproperty, which List.s all easements. VII. F]NAI SITE PLAN once a building permit has been issued, and construction isunderwayr and before the Buirding Department will schedule aframing inspection, Lwo copies oi an- rmprovement Locat.ionCertificate survey (ILC) stamped by a rlgisteredprofessional engineer must be submitted. The followinoinfornation must, be provided on t,he ILC: BuiLding locat.ion (s) with ties to property corners,l.e. distances and angles. Building dimensions to the nearest tenth of a foot. Al1 utility service line as-builts, showing type ofmaterial used, and size and exact, Locat.ion-of-l_ines. Drainage as-builts. Basis of bearing to tie to section corner. AIl property pins are to be either found or set andstat.ed on improvement survey. AIl easements. Building floor elevations and al1 roof ridge elevationswith exlstlng and proposed grades shown under the ridgelines. ET A. B. c, D. F El H. VIII. A.SubmittaL requirernents: The o$rner or authorized agentof any project requiring design approval as prescribed by thj.s chapter may subnit plans for conceptual review by tbe Design Review Board to the Department of Community Development. The conceptual review is intended to give the applicant a basic understanding ofthe compatibilit.y of their proposal with the Town's Design Guidelines. This procedure is recommendedprimarily for applications more complex than single-family and tvro-family residences. Ilowever, developersof single-family and two-family projects shall not be excluded from the opportunity to request a conceptual design review. complete applications must be submitt,ed 10 days prior to a scheduled DRB meeting. The following information shall be submitted for a conceptual review: 1. A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of one inch equals twenty feeti 2. Conceptual elevations showing exterior mat.erials and a descripLion of the character of the proposed structure or structures,' 3. Sufficlent information to show the proposal complies with the development standards of the zone district in which the project is to belocated (i.e. GRFA, site coverage calculations, number of parking spaces, eUc.)t 4. Complet.ed DRB application form. Procedure: Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the DeparLment of Community Development shall review t,he submitted materials forgeneral compliance with the appropriate requirements ofthe zoning code. If the proposal is in basic compliance with the zoning code requirements, theproject shal1 be forwarded to the DFB for conceptualreview. If the application is not generally in compliance with zoning code requirements, theapplication and submittal materials sha11 be returnedto the applicant with a written explanation as to whythe Community Development Department staff has foundthe project not to be in compliance with zoning codereguirements. Once a complete application has been receJ-ved, the DRB shall review the submitted conceptualreview applicat.ion and supporting material in order todetermine whether or not the project generally complieswith the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote onconceptual reviews. The property ovrner or hisrepresenLative shall be present at the DRB hearing. R o L]ST OF MATERIALS NAI4E OF pROJEcT: 6tu's AdJr*ro,t LEGAT DESCRTPTTO* t STREET ADDRESS : 113 &or. Crr:zrc Drt_r<- Var'[ r /_c.. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A.tl.{r,-n o€ a- a,a.- <<{.-c,raoo d\.Ff,L Y^LAl tA \'^f*, . requj-red for submittal to the Designapproval can be given: TYPE OF MATERTAL COLOR The following Review Board A.BUTLDING Roof Siding information isbefore a final MATERTALS: Other WalI Materials Fascia Soffit s Windows talindow Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other B. LANDSCAPING: Name lr^.orrcrble- L.e-r-o.-9^-\o' 5ea erte- g t EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED {b^ PLANT MATERTALS: Botanical- Name common Name ouanLitv size* PROPOSED TREES Tr-s$ptsal_gxplfsq fse€__, ,_J *fndicate caliper for deciduous trees.Indicatedeciduous trees is 2 inches. Mp{a[ urb*"t e.,r"f,E *.rL of Designer: Phone: gnrl $, 'f^tt ,/, t,rees.o Minimum caliper forheight for coniferous PLANT MATER*: Botanical Name cot.orl"*" Ouantitv Size* PROPOSED SHRUBS EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *Indicate size5 qallon - of proposed shrubs. Type Minimum size of shrubs is Sguare Footaqe GROUND CO\rERS SOD SEED TYPE OF IRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROT LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: rf exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separat,elighting p1an. Identify each fj.xture from the lighting planon the lisL below and provide the wattage, height abovegrade and type of light proposed. D.OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining walls, fences, swimrningpooJ-s, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwalls. Maximum height of walls within the front setback it3 feet. Maximum height of walls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet. SUBDIVISION .]OB NAME BLOCK FILING ADDRESS The location and avairabirity of utirities, whether they be maintrun! 1y"9 or proposed lines, must be approved and verlfied bythe following utilities for the accompanying site plan. Authorized Siqnature Date U.S. West Communications L-800-922-1987 468-6860 or 949-4530 Public Service Company 9 4 9-s7 81 Gary Hall HoJ.y Cross Electric Aasoc. 949-5892 Ted Husky/Michael Laverty Heritage Cablevision T.V. 94 9-5530 Steve Hiatt Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District * 47 6-7 480 Fred HasLee NOTE: 1.servj.ce availability andbe used in conjunction withplan and scheduling This form is to verifylocation. This shouldpreparing your utilityinst.allaLions. E'or any new construction proposal , tbe applicantmust. provide a completed utility verificationform. If a ut.ility company has concerns with theproposed construction, the ut.ility represent,ativeshould not. directly on the utitity verificationform that. there is a problem whicl needs to beresolved. The issue should then be spelled out indetail in an attached letter t.o the Town of Vail.However, please keep in mind that it is theresponsibility of the utility company to resolveidentified problens. If the utility verification form has signaturesfrom each of the utilit.y companies, and no comments are made directly on the form, the Townwill presume that there are no problems and thatthe development can proceed. These verificati-ons do not, relieve the conLractorof his responsibility to obtain a street cutpermit, from the Town of Vail, Department of public Tgtt g and to obtain utilitv locations beforediqqinq in any public right:of-way or easenrent inthe Town of Vai1. A buildinq pernit is not astreet cut pernit. A street cut permit must beobtained separately. * Please bring a site plan, floor p1an, and elevat,ions whenobtaining upper Eagle va1ley water I sanitation signatures. Fireflow needs must be addressed. 2. 3. 4. 5. ZONE CI{ECK FOR , R, E P/S ZONE DTSTRT Block FiIing ocTs I SFR DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOt ADDRESS: OWNER ARCHITECT ZONE DISTRICT PROPOSED USE **LOT SIZE Height Total GRFA Primary GRFA Secondary GRFA Setbacks Front Sides Rear Water Course Setback Site Coverage Landscaping Retaining Wa1l Heights Parking Garage Credit Drive: View Corridor Encroachment: Envi ronmental /Hazards : PHONE PHONE Allowed (30) (33) Existinq Proposed TotaI 20, 1q, L5' (30) (s0) 3' /6' Reqrd (300) (600) (900) (1200)_ Pernitted Slope 8t Actual Slope Date approved by Town Engineer: Yes No '>24 + 425 +425= 1\Lt 2',) 3) Flood Pl-ain Percent Slope Geologic Hazardsa) Snow Avalanche b) RockfalIc) Debris Flow4) Wetlands Prevl-ous conditions of approval (check property file) Does thls reguest involve a 250 Addition?Howmuchotthea11owed250Additionisuseffiisrequest? **Note: Under Sections 1-8 .12 .090 (B) and 18. j_3.080 (B) of the Municipalcode, lots zoned Two Family and primary,/secondary which are ress than15r000 sq. ft. in area may not. const,ruct a second.dwelling unit. TheConrnunity Development Department may grant an exception to thisrestriction provided the applicant meets the criteria set forth underSections L8.L2.090(B) and 18.1-3.080(B) of the Municipal Code includingpermanentry restricting the unit as a rong-tern rental unit for fulr-time enployees of the Upper Eagle Valtey. 10 o:t. i1 I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEIIORANDUil Planning and Environmental Gommission Community Dovelopment Department Applicant: Planners: ff{, [ $EP H February 14,1994 A request for a minor Exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building, specifically located at 193 Goie Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing. Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom Armstrong Randy Stouder At the January 10, 1994 Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) meeting, the issue lhal rais€d a signiticant concem with the PEC members was statf recommondation #1 thal addressed transplanting the existing lree to a planter on the right side of the John Gault's €ntraneg. The PEC felt that tlansplanting the tree was not appropriate mitigation for the loss of a planter and bench. Most members felt that a new planter should be required in the general vicinity of the proposed grease contiainer housing. A discussion ensued over exactly what tlpe of planter tre PEC was looking lor; Tom Armstrong asked if a masonry planter or stone planter was required and expressed concern over the expsnse related to such an item. Diana Donovan said that a large pot or tree grate should be investigated. This approach seem€d acceptable to a majority of the PEc members and Diana Donovan made a motion to tabfe the item with Bill Anderson seconding. A vote of 7-0 tabled the item. On January 31, 1994, statf received a memorandum lrom Erich Hill, the applicants' architect and agent. The applicants propose to fansplant the existing tree to a movable pot. The pot would be either wood or ceramic material and would be placed as shown on the attached site plan. Slatf requests that the gpplicant wananty the survival ol the tres for two full growing seasons. lf the tree dles during fiat two growing season perlod, the applicant would teplace the tr€e with a like tree. Statf is recommending approval ol the requested exterior alteration and site coverage variance with Conditions 2 and 3 from the original memo and with the modified Condition 1 as stated belor. (Please note the wording changes are indicated in bold type.) 1. The applicants shall transplant (or replace) the omamental tree to a new "movable" pot as shown gn thg revlsed slte ptan. Installing the pot and trarcplanting the tree shalt be completed during the construction Process for the grsase container enclosure. o 2. A minimum 48" clear width shall be maintained between the exisling and proposed dumpster housings to allow pedestrian a@ess to the parking garage below. 3. A regular maintenancs program shall be sel-up for the new grease container housing. Ar€as in front of the housing shall be included in the maintenancE program. The maintenance program shall be devised by the Town of Vail's Environntental Health Offlcer in cooperation with the applicants. The program shall include, but not be limited to, steam cleaning the housing at a minimum of once every six months. Waste and runoff generated during the cleaning procebs shall be collected, shall not be allowed to move ofl-site into the public righbof-way, and Ehall be handled and disposEd of as sewage. The grease contialners shall be removed for cleaning by the service company at a '. lrequency nol less than oncE every six months. The Environmsntal. Health Officer will enlorce these maintenance provisions during routine inspections ol ihe reslaurant facilities irwolved. ctp.cvn€||r6hcphz.214 nl7I { H t\, \) us ulI 1 t -l 7 5 t $ $ DESICN -t I Randy stouder Conmunity Development Dept. Town of VaiI 75 South Frontage RoadVail, Colorado 81657 Re: BLurs and Sweet Basil Addition Dear Randy: we are proposing tfrat tne transplanted tree be placed in a movablepot. The pot naterial will be elther wood or a ceramic material to be reviewed by the Design Review Board. It rrill be placed withinthe property as shown on the site plan. A tree grate would be difficult beqause of the parking structure located below this area. The snall aniount of irater from watering the tree would drain on to the right of way, as all precipitation does because of the natureof the sloping paver surface. This rnirninal amount of water will not create a drainage probJ.em for the Gore creek Drive area. We still feel that the best solution is to transplant the tree to the exl.sting planter near the door of Sweet aasil. If you have any guestions or comnents, please contact me. Thank you for your assistance. ARCHITECTURE PLANNINC INTERIORS PARADICM 1-31-94 P.O. BOX 73I VAIL, COLORADO 81658 303-476-6397 6. FIt[ fiffiP-f Allison Lassoe said that the decks over Garfinkle's were a problem. She stated that the addition lacked coherency. Dalton Williams stated he was concerned with the overhang on the north side and that he would like to see these overhangs stepped back. He said that a one story addition on the lower level could work and would look better in terms of mass. He said that he was not in favor of the small deck. He did nol want to see the wall jut out. He said that adding a deck on top of Garfinkle's does make sense. Kalhy Langenwalter stated that she was concerned with the north elevation. She said that the decks need to be more compatible with the existing building. She stated that the proposed additional mass and bulk at that height is not appropriate. Bill Pierce stated that he would discuss different options with the applicant and get with staff. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver Dam Circle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, VailVillage 3rd Filing. 7. Kathy Langenwalter stepped down from the PEC due to a conflict of interest, and Greg Amsden was chairperson for this item. Mike Mollica made a presentalion per the staff memo. He stated that staff believes this request meets the purpose section of the Subdivision Regulations. He said that staff recommended approval of this request for a minor suMivision with the two conditions outlined on Page 6 of the slaff memo. Mike stated that by going through this minor subdivision process that a nonconforming situation would not be created. Don Byers, an adjacent property owner, stated that he supported this request for a minor exterior alteration. Diana Donovan made a motion to approve the minor subdivision per the staff memo with the two conditions of approvalas recommended by staff. Dalton Williams seconded the motion and a 6-0-1. vote approved this item. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the @re Creek Plaza Bulldlng, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek DriveiPart of Block 5-B, VailVillage lst Filing. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planners: John Tyler/John Tyler, JrlRobert Tyler Mike Mollica Char'les Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom Armstrong Randy Stouder Plannlng fid Envhonnqdrl C,ommbjon Fobrurry ta, l9o4 19 )- Randy Stouder made a presentation per the staff memo. Diana Donovan sfated that the planter needs to be large enough lo accommodate ine tree. Dalton Williams made a motion to approved this request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance with Jeff Bowen seconding the motion. A 7-0 vote approved this request. 8. A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved exterior alteration proposal for the Slifer Building, 230 Bridge StreeVPart of Lots B and C, Block 5, VailVillage 1st Filing. Applicant: Planner: Rod and Beth Slifer Kristan Pritz Kristan Pritz stated that Beth Slifer would present the PEC with a proposed sculpture. Beth Slifer stated that there is only one sculpture available from Deane Knox for this space. She showed the proposed sculpture to the PEC and explained its dimensions. She stated that this sculpture was 12 inches taller than the previous sculpture and that it would sit on an 18 inch pedestal. Dalton Williams stated that he is concerned with the appearance of the pedestal. She stated at this point in lime, this sculpture is the only alternative available. He stated that he would like to see something tall located in this space. Allison Lassoe stated that she agreed with Dalton's comments. Jeff Bowen stated that he was in favor of the proposed sculpture. Greg Amsden stated that he would like to see a more vertical sculpture. He added that the subject matter of this proposed sculpture is better than that previously proposed. Diana Donovan stated that she agreed with Greg's comments and added that the proposed sculpture does not fit the space. She stated she would like to see the base of this area softened. She suggested "petunias" in the summer and evergreen branches in the winter. Beth Slifer stated that they have tried to locate vegetation in this area and lhat they have not been able to keep anything alive there. Bill Anderson stated that he had a difficult time commenting on this item because he cannot visualize the piece. He stated that he felt that the subject matter and height was better than the current piece. Pllnnlng lnd ErNhormrntrl co|nmir|ion Fobruary 14, leetl 14 FE!- [ ff&PY 3.A notification of ol a minor SDD to allow for the addition of an airlock entry to the:G Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing/l2 Vail Road. Applicant: Planner: Mike Mollica made a oer th€ staff memo. Diana Donovan made motion the staff approval of the request for a minor amendment to the vote approved this ay Bu with Dalton Williams seconding the motion. A 7-0 A request for a minor exterior alteration ard a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed grease dumpster at the southw, )st corner of the 0orc Greek Plaza Bullclirg., 1 specifically located at 1€3 Gore Creek Dr ve/Part of Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Filing. Applicant: Planner: Charles Rbsenquis' represented by Kevin Clair and Tom Armstrong Randy Stouder Kristan Pritz removed herself from the sta ff table as Erich Hill is the architect for the project. Randy Stouder made a presentation per he stiaff memo. He said that staff was recommending approval of the requesteo site coverage variance and the minor exterior alteration with the three conditions of app"oval outlined on Page 8 of the staff memo. Erich Hill, the architect for this project, sti ted that they were attempting to take care of an existing problem in the simplest mann -'r possible. Russ Forrest said that this is the culmina ion of several meetings in the last two years with adjacent property owners and that U is solution seems to make the most sense and that the Town appreciates the applic rnt's initiative to take care of this issue. Dalton Williams voiced a concern that th( doors be designed and used so that they do not create an "eyesore". He wanted to n ake sure that restaurant employees closed the doors when not using the facilities. I e favored an automalic door design similar to that on the Sitzmark dumpster housing. Greg Amsden agreed with Dalton's comn,ents. Diana Donovan stated that she felt part c, this request was to get the grease containers emptied quicker and that she vas concerned that this would not happen since the proposed containers are the sa ne size. Plannlng and Envlronmen al Commission Minutes January i ), 1994 4 Tom Armstrong stated that the grease wa s picked up once a month and that an extra container was needed to hold the amoun of grease now produced. More frequent pick-up was not an option per the grease company. Diana Donovan added she would like to :,ee additional landscaping in the area of the stone wall lo break up the asphalt in this area. She felt strongly enough about this issue that without additional landscaping :eing added to this request, she was prepared to vote against it. Several men'bers of the PEC concurred with Diana and a discussion of landscaping alternatives en ;ued. Erich Hill stated that it was his opinion th, rt a tree grate may not do well in this location. He said that they were attempting to stay as cost effective as possible. However, there might be problems with the below g round parking deck. Bill Anderson asked whether the DRB co rld address the landscaping issue. Kathy Langenwalter said that since lands:aping would be removed and additional site coverage was proposed as a result of thi:i reQuest, that the PEC should require additional landscaping as a condition of :.cproval. Kathy Langenwalter was concerned abou i what materials would be used for the grease enclosure and that whatever material was selected needed to be durable. Dalton Williams stated that he fefi fhat aclitional landscaping was important and should be a part of the PEG's approval. Allison Lassoe said that she would like tc see the enclosure look and function well for this site. Jeff Bowen stated that he felt that the lar Cscaping and the material of the enclosure were DRB issues. Greg Amsden said that he would like to s ee additional landscaping be a part of the approval. Kathy Langenwalter said that she also fe I the landscaping should be a part of the approval. Diana Donovan made a motion to appro\ e this request and amend Gondition 1 to read "that additional landscaping be added as a part of the construction process for the grease container enclosure." Bill Anders rn seconded the motion. Russ Forrest added that the problem is s rared by adjacent retail owners and condominium owners, and that staff appr:ciated the owners of Blu's and Sweet Basil's coming forward to address this problem. Planning and Envlronmon al commission Minutss January : J, 1994 Erich Hill requested that this item be tiabl,'d so that both restaurant owners (applicants) could be consulted regarding the cost an r design of the additional landscaping that the PEC was requgsting. There was discussion as to what type of llanting would be appropriate. T.J., owner of Blu's Restaurant, asked il a masonry plaf ter was required. Diana said that it was not but that a large pot on tree grate should l,e investigated. Diana Donovan withdrew her motion and Sill Anderson withdrew his second to the motion. Diana Donovan made a motion to table t:iis item to January 24,1994, the next pEC meeting with Bill Anderson seconding thir motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this item until January 24,1994. 5. A request to modify the landscaping plan associated the previously approved exterior alteration for the Slifer t uilding,StreeuPart of Lots B and C, Block 5, Vail Applicant: Planner: 1st Filing. and Beth Slife: Diana Donovan stated that would likt landscaping placed on the site in order to break up the bui as well as r sculpture. She suggested some sort of ornamental pine or shrub winter and potted plants or flowers during the summer. She felt original was still the best solution. Kristan PriE asked the PEC wh loposed sculpture was acceptable. Diana Donovan stated that it was n was acceptable. She said that the wh, rt the PEC had originally asked for but that it 'iad requested a piece that fit the space and that the proposed piece did not Dalton Williams stated that the and black base were not appropriate and that he would like to see applical be required to do what the original approval called for. Allison Lassoe said that would like tc the applicant one more chance to come up with an art piece for the s lace.She said that she was not in favor of the sculpture that was now. She cruld envision the landscaping working with the sculpture but there was a wi y. Jeff Bowen stated the box under the statue improvement. lt was his He said that he would preferopinion that the was not appropria.e for this to see a piece of art landscape. the space that re ally fit the as opposed to additional and Envlronmen al Commlsslon Minutss January ''c' 1994 PriIz TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM pranning and Environmentar commission $: f L f frflF Y Community Development Department January 10, 1994 A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-8, Vail Village lst Filing. Applicant: Planner: Charles Flosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom Armstrong Randy Stouder I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED FEQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of an application for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of an enclosure to house two waste grease containers. The grease container housing would be located at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building in the Commercial Core I zone disirict. The building is already at approximately 80% site coverage. The housing would contribute 60 square feet of additional site coverage which would push the Gore Creek Plaza Building 41 square feet over the allowable site coverage. Thus, a site coverage variance is required for the additional 41 square feet. The grease containers would serve two restaurants, including Sweet Basil's and Blu's. The container's dimensions are 9'X 7'X 8' (width,depth,height), with a flat roof. The dumpster housing would be 60 square feet in size, would displace an existing bench and planter, and would have a stucco finish and a metal clad door. The dumpster housing would be constructed on the existing concrete slab (underground parking garage roof), and the colors will match the existing building colors which are white stucco and black trim. The architectural design concept is to "fit in with the Gore Creek Plaza Building and the surrounding Village area". Staff suggested that the applicant provide some form of mitigation for the displaced landscaping planter. Transplanting or replacing the one ornamental tree that is impacted, within the existing planter to the east of John Gault's entrance would be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND This application was generaled in response to longstanding complaints of trash and grease overflows outside the existing dumpster housing located on the adjacent Sitzmark Lodge property. In an attempt to resolve this problem, the Town of Vail's Environmental Heallh Officer and Senior Environmental Planner conducted several meetings with the owners of the various restaurants, retail shops and buildings that utilize the existing dumpsler housing which contains one grease container and three trash dumpsters. The consensus opinion at these meetings was that the dumpster overflow problems were related to inadequate capacity in the dumpsters relative to the large number of users. Currently, the Sitzmark dumpsters are used by three restaurants, two retail slores, the Sitzmark Lodge and 15-20 condominium. The participants felt that additional dumpster facilities must be provided if the problems were to be resolved. Several options were discussed in the last meeting, held on December 14, 1993, between the Environmental Heath Officer, the Senior Environmenlal Planner, and restaurant and shop owners in the area. These options included more frequent clean out of the grease dumpster by the service company, holding trash temporarily overnight inside the restaurant instead of disposing of it late at night after closing, and hiring a private company to clean the area around and inside the dumpsters on a regular basis. The first option was deemed not feasible since trash volume (not just grease) is also an issue and additional trash pick-ups are not available due to vehicular access restrictions in the Village Core. The second option was deemed not feasible for Health related reasons. The last option has not been fully explored. The restaurant owners'decided that constructing a new housing, for grease containers only, was necessary. This would allow them to remove the existing grease container from the existing dumpster housing, providing space for a new dumpster to be marked for flattened corrugated cardboard box disposal only (to be recycled). Thus, a separation of the waste stream would occur which would hopefully alleviate some of the trash volume problems related to cardboard box disposal. Ths restaurant, retail store and Lodge owners felt that un-crushed cardboard boxes were taking up a large share of the trash dumpster volume. III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS The following summarizes the zoning statistics for this exterior alteration request: A. Zone District: B. Lot Area: C. Site Coverage: D. Height: E. Parking: Commercial Core I 5,000 square feet required 7,553 square feet provided 6,043 square feet (80.0%) allowed 6,024 square feet (79.8%) existing 60 square feet (0.79%) addition proposed 6,084 square feet (80.6%) new total Not Applicable. Not Applicable. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE PURPOSE SECTION OF THE COMMERCIAL CORE I ZONE DISTRICT 18.24.010 Puroose: "The Commercial Core I District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village Commercial Area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishmenb in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The o Commercial Core I District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrian ways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the Village." It is the staff's opinion that the proposed change to the Gore Creek Plaza Building, would be in compliance with the Purpose Section of the Commercial Core I Zone District as stated above. We also believe that the addition will not negatively effect the scale of the building nor detract from the overall appearance of the building as viewed frcm the pedestrian areas adjacent to the building. V. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THIS PROPOSAL The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan includes three elements which establish the review criteria for this application. The first of these is referred to as the Guide Plan which includes a number of sub-area concepts, many of which identify potential areas for future development and other improvements. Secondly, the Urban Design Considerations express the large scale, land use planning and design considerations, Finally, the architectural/landscape considerations, which will be reviewed by the Design Review Board, establish the criteria for evaluating detailed design considerations of a proposal. The Vail Village Master Plan and the Town of Vail Streetscape Masler Plan address specific goals pertaining to the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village. The following sections, Sections Vl-lX of this memorandum, provide relevant citations from the design and planning documents mentioned above. These citations are followed by a short discussion of the issues related to the application. VI. COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN FOR VAIL VILLAGE There are no specific sub-area concepts relevant to this proposal. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH THE URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR VAIL VTLLAGE The following design considerations are acritical element of the Urban Design Guide Plan. They identify the key physical characterislics of the Village and provide the tools to ensure that new development is consistenl with the established character. The design considerations include the following: A. Pedestrianization: The proposed grease container housing will not have any impacts on the pedestrian traffic flow along Gore Creek Drive. The housing will not effect the existing pedestrian area since it is located in an alley-like alcove off the main pedestrian corridor, and is completely enclosed. The housing has been dimensioned and positioned to maintain at least a 48 inch walkway access (per building code) to the stairs which lead down to the parking garage beneath the Gore Creek Plaza Building. Staff invesligated turning the enclosure so that the doors would not open out toward the street However, this would block access to the stairs leading to the parking garage when the grease containers were being utilized or serviced. B. Vehicular Penetration: The housing will not impact service vehicle access to the existing trash dumpster. C. Streetscape Framework: The housing should not effect the streetscape framework since existing buildings and existing landscaping will screen the pedestrians' view of the facility from most directions except when one is walking directly in front of the enclosure. D. Street Enclosure: The housing will be tucked into an off-street alcove and will not produce scale or enclosure problems since it is much smaller than the surrounding buildings. E. Street Edge: Statf believes that the housing will not impact the street edge along Gore Creek Drive since it is recessed from the immediate street edge. F. Building Height: Building height will be unaffected as a result of this proposal. The Gore Creek Plaza Building and the Sitzmark Lodge are much higher than the container housing. The proposed height of the enclosure is 8 feet. This height was chosen to allow for ease of grease disposal into the top of the grease container and 1o allow headroom so service people can move around inside the enclosure. The height also matches the existing rock wall, which a portion of the enclos.ure will abut. G. Views and Focal Points: The proposed remodel does not affect any ol the Town's adopted view corridors. The remodel will have no impact on the line-of-sight from either the top or the bottom of Gore Creek Drive. H. Service and Dellvery: The proposed expansion will not affect current seruice and delivery patterns. l. Sun/Shade: There will be no increase in shadow patterns as a result of this addition, as it is located within the shade patterns of the existing buildings. o J. Architectural/LandscapeandServiceConsiderations: This proposal is made by the owner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building in order to correct an existing trash storage problem. The trash quantities generated by the multiple users of existing trash and grease facilities are in excess of the capacity available. The new grease container housing should help to alleviate this problem. The containers will be readily accessible for collection and maintenance. Existing buildings and an 8 foot high rock wall will screen the housing to the extent possible given the constraints of the site. The applicant proposes materials, colors and architectural style that are compatible with the surrounding buildings. The proposed housing will displace a small bench and raised planter arrangement, containing one ornamental tree (2 inch caliper). $taff proposes mitigation the loss of the planter and bench by transplanting or replacing the ornamental tree in an existing planter adjacent to the entrance of John Gault. VIII. RELATED GOALS AND POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND The general goals in the Vail Village Master Plan provide guidance which is relevant to this proposal as follows: "Goal#1 -Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of communily and identity. 1,2 Oblective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. Goal #3 -To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of the walking experience throughout the Village. 3.1 Obfective: Physically improve existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. Policy: Prior development projects shall incorporate streetscape improvements along adjacent pedestrian ways." The Streetscape Master Plan provides guidance related to improving the pedestrian experience in the Village Core as follows: "There is a need for additional landscaping to help soften portions of the Village which are predominantly asphalt street, stonewalls, and building facades. . . ." "Unsightly alleys, trash compactors, and enclosures, service/delivery enlrances should be 3.1.1 screened whenever possible. The use of nalive landscaping for screening is strongly recommended As stated previously, the main purpose of this application is.to upg^rad3 existing comm-ercial development by resotvirig " forig standing trash'ficility problem. Architectural compatibility' screening and landscapins, "ni trash ficility mainlenance are the main issues with the application. Staf proposer"in"t tn" applicants'-move the impacted landscaping' The proposed tocarion of the enctos";t;tili;;;-#itinf nritcings and walls to screen the housing from p-"-O"rtii"n ways. Stalf has discussed maintenance issues with the applicant and proposes a solution in the staff Discussion and Recommendation section of this memorandum' IX. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.62.060 of the Vail Municipal Code requires, that prior to granting of a variance' the commission to consider the following factors. A. Gonsideration of Factors: : 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The grease container housing will not have any adverse impact on surounding structures, existing or poten'iial uses in lhe area. The below-grade parking. structure underlies the area where the housing will sit. The housing will be placed on the concrete slab that provides the roof of the parking garage. The site of the housing is recessed from the street edge in an alley-like alcove between the Gore Creek plaza Building and the Sitzmark- Lodge, The housing will be tied into the side of the Gore cr6ek plaza Building wniCn witl shield it from pedestrian views from the east. The existing dumpster housing and an existing landscaping planter will shield the proposed -nousing from pedestrian views from the west. The dimensions and placement of the housing will not effect the pedestrian entrance to the parking gaiage since a minimum 48" clear width will be maintained to allow people to acie-"s thi stairs to the below-grade parking structure. The housing will bnty Ue visible when directly in front of the alcove area between th9 twq buildings. Since service access to the enclosure must be maintained, there is little that can be done to mitigate this view. 2. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcemeit of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of ireatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the oblectives of this title without grant of special privilege' The site coverage variance is necessary since the Gore Creek Plaza Building is . so close to the maximum allowed site coverage (80%). Approval of the housing in its proposed location is necessary to alleviate existing problems related to trash and grease disposal. The existing trash and grease lacilities are inadequate to accommodale the volume of waste-generated bt the multiple users. The prop_osed location of the housing is the only functional place.for this use on lhe Gore Creek 6 Plaza Building property. lt is adjacent to the existing trash dumpster housing' readily accessible by seruice vehicles and placed so it will have minimal impact on pedestrian walkways and adjacent structures and uses- The housing is tonveniently locateb to its major users. The size of the enclosure is what is necessary tb adequately house two grease containers. Strict literal enforcement of the sitl coverage maximum would prevent the applicants from addressing a sanitation issue. 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and lraffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. As expressed in paragraphs 1 and2 above, the variance will have little or no effect on light, air, population, transportation or public facilities and utilities. The structure will not require the extension of any utilities, and will help protect public health and welfare by reducing health hazards related to existing trash overflows and inadequate capacity of trash and grease storage facilities. lt is staff's opinion that the proposed housing will not provide the restaurants with any special privilege. Granting the variance can only improve the public health, safety and welfare by improving a long-standing health-related problem. Staff feels that this application will significantly improve a long standing public health problem related to grease overflows at lhe existing dumster facilities. 2. 3. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, salety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is waranled for one or more of the following reasons: a. The strict literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title' b. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. c. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation ' would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. before orantino a variance: X. STAFF DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the application for a site coverage variance and approval of the application for a minoi exterior alteration to allow the construction of the proposed grease container housing, subject to the conditions outlined below. This recommendation is based on the fact that the strict imposition of the site coverage provision of the Zoning Ordinance would be contrary to the general purpose of the Ordinance itself; which is designed to protect the public health and welfare of thi piople of the Town. Granting the requested variance will not have an adverse impact on the adiacent structures and uses, and will not provide any special privilege to the applicant. Current and historical odor and visual problems related to lrash disposal are a direct consequence of: the inadequate capacity of existing facilities relative to the waste volume generated by multiple users, ihe lack of separation of different types of waste materials, and a general lack of maintenance in and around tire dumpster housing area. After reviewing the guidance contained in the Vail Viltage Master Plan, the Urban Design Guide Plan and Guideline Considerations, and the Streetscape Master Plan, the cunent pioposal will be acceptable given the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicants shall transplant (or replace) the ornamental tree to a new location in the planter adjacent to the entrance to John Gault, as a part of the construction process for the grease container enclosure, 2. A minimum 48" clear width shall be maintained between the existing and proposed dumpster housings to allow pedestrian access to the parking garage below. 3. A regular maintenance program shall be set-up for the new grease container housing. Areas in front of the housing shall be included in the maintenance program. The maintenance program shall be devised by the Town of Vail's Environmental Health Officer in cooperation with the applicants. The program shall include, but not be limited to, steam cleaning the housing ai a minimum of once every six monlhs. Waste and runoff generat-ed during theLleaning process shall be collected, shall not be allowed to move off- site into the public right-of-way, and shall be handled and disposed of as sewage. The grease containers shall be removed for cleaning by the respective service companies at a frequency not less than once every six months. The Environmental Health Officer will enforce these maintenance provisions during routine inspections of the restaurant facilities involved. Although not the only users of the Sitzmark dumpster, the applicants are encouraged to facilitate waste slream separation by working together with other shop and restaurant owners to provide a new dumpster within the Sitzmark's dumpster enclosure for corrugated cardboard box disposal only. The new dumpster could be placed in the existing SiEmark dumpster housing, and used for cardboard box disposal only. The dumpster should be clearly labeled "For flatlened corrugated cardboard boxes only" to encourage employees to separate out the boxes from other trash. Also, staff feels strongly that a regular maintenance program should be set-up for the existing trash dumpster housirig, Staff recommends a program similar to that mentioned in condition #3 above. -_.t-/l"-.-l --t R- ltlbs(t tt lsl{loal.r ii, \ \ $[] I/Y 9a llo \J 't\\ h 6 k *l il kl l'l! NO SCALE oF LOT A, BLOCK *r"qol?'oo"l€rlD€TAIL PrcE -s€E THS A PART 5-Fl P|'{ a cAP l,lo. l5a2t ?OCX WALL ANO ,LANTEA. WTAN FtO.'x" tr{ cOrcRE?E a s€t PN a D.(r_ I r''i L5, n. 16827 z9 ool € SITZMARK LODGE I t \r\ l\ B€LL IOW€R CONOOM 8EtN6 USe0 fOFt Acc€ PLAZA CONOOMINIUM9 BELL TOV\ CONDOMINII WALL FLANGE !T SUPPORT 5€4o2trt./ z3' t t-- \ \r, I c.c.e. otc* a tte"1 \133,!3--'l:' \ Y--*"-- I\ SITZMARX BUILONC OUTL}IE oo FNA.. DRIVE (,d vt VICINITY MAP (ao'l rrre'rry); fn'tj 24-1 sTArns wTH co/v€RcrAL SPACE EELol{ t s*€ET EAS|L /\:C(SS I STAIR CPENIT.IC UIILITY BOX - dJiLIN€ OF UNOERCNOUND P AXIHG NOOF oursloE. STAIRS flRST fLOOR 3 S'ORY WOOD AND CONCRETE coMMERCIAL 8UlL0lll6 AngA cF LoT r 0,r7!. ACFES JRO A Srll LEVEL DSCXS OUILINE OF UNO€RGROUNO PAFXING ROOf FOR SIIZMAFK LODCE . N6.o2Jo5"E't 39- ,;l t-fe'- I I Il_ t' I I It4 c.c,6. COIICR ETE l.O'WloE -FOCX I{'ALL GORE o Retum to INTER.DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW PRoJECT: Fk i tfr- DATE SUBMITTED: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS NEEDED BY: BHIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: FIHE DEPARTMENT('C p l,-'tu^) Reviewed by: A*'-*. i e d ck :! d^* swdl *, ^;/fr { a+tzaa r# f*K^A i**f. {(,, :4w /Date: tz /21 tYd.d I t/3,Q PROJECT: DATE SUBMITTED: COMMENTS NEEDED BRIEF DESCRIPTION Return to INTER.D EPARTMENI'AL REVIEW DATE OF PUBLIC BY: /+/zi OF THE PROPOSAL: Date: Date:Reviewed by: Comments: PUBLIC WORKS Ensineerins: e7 &zl Reviewed by: Comments: frer:r\ grndef (ru1$rt\.\ k,.ir'rl .-\:rri-r,f. r; 'i-'\\€€t ... tl) frer e docr dftrtn,,r g. bL'rr.r (tir..) u'r-. rdr '\1-,'-t.O i -- rlcor: sha:rd io.e o tfo-t d&lr 'j ' {:cl 66(ev c(e{ D ir''ir] + r€rld to crJn rf .r-\r,'e fr^.r-r61 iiir'-(\r' dcorocrt'6- - tc b8 rwr ^p+rl.19'@ - Landscaping: revised L0/5/92 t ,i I. APPLISATION This procedure is requiredvariance- The applicationinformation is submitt,ed. ADDRESS q3 APPLICANT, S REpRESEt'itetfvS Pa^r4d rq,r,Ener^ tdtD FEE $2so. oo pArDA{b"icK # Ua'|, (.o atass e"o*u_-Ijt3l-E__ NAME OF ADDRESS THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE COMMUNITY DEVE],OPMENT DEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. PHoNE +7te-b>q1 NAME OF owNER (S) ADDRESS OWNER(S) (type or print) SIGNATURE (S) Uatl, (a Blaa66 eHoNn ?a*:;+D.LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT__..1ge_ BLOCK ADDRESS rr. A pre-application conference with a pJ.anning staff member isst.rongly suggest.ed Lo deternine if any addi[iona1information is needed. No applicatioi wirl be accept.ed ill.::-11_is complere (musr include alI irems required byLrre zonrng adminlst,rator). It is the applicant'sresponsibirity to make an appoint.ment witr, tne staff to findout about additional submittaL requirements. III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION W]LL STRBAMLINE THEAPPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PNOMCT BY DECREASING THE NUMBEROF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING ANDENVTRONMENTAL COMMISSION (pEC) MAy STTPULATE. ALrCONDITIONS OF APPROVA]., MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFOEE ABUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. FOUR (4) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE NATURE OF THEVARIANCE REQUESTED AND THE REGULATION INVOLVED. THE STATEMENT MUST ALSO ADDRESS: 1. The relationship of the request,ed variance toother,existing or potentiar. uses and structures i_nthe vicinit.y. FFc?;l,rl 4 ggt Application PEC MEETING Date l-'l-'q + DATE l- to -q+ FOR A V'TRIA}TCE for any project requesting awill not be accepled until all Kc*rri C),as (:'q*.t hra't ) €lto-ot z5 'l+lr7g1 F. Stamped, addressed envelopes of the names of owners ofall property adjacent to the subject property INCLUDINGPROPERTY BEHIND AND ACROSS STREETS, ANA I riSt Of Thcirnames and mailing addresses. THE APPLICANT WILL BERESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES - 2' I5::i'i:.::"::i:1,ffi'f5 :n::;.il'li'u"specified regulation is necessary to achieve 4, Icompatibility and uniformity of treatment amongsites in the vicinity or to attain the objectivesof this t.itle without grant of special privilege. 3. The effect of the variance on light and air,distribution of population, transporLaLion,traffic facilities, utilities, and public safety. 4. How your request compJ-ies with Vail's Comprehensive. P1an. B. A topographic and,/or improvement survey at a scale ofat least 1ri = 20' stamped by a Colorado licensedsurveyor including locations of all existing .improvements, including grades and eLevations. Other elements which must be shown are,parking and loadingareas, ingress and egress, landscaped areas and utility !,,. ,, and drainage features. A site plan at a scale of at Least L" - 20t showingexisting and proposed buildings. A1I preliminary building elevations and floor planssufficient to indicate the dimensions, general'appearance, scale and use of aI1 buildings and spacesexisting and proposed on the site. A preliminary title reporL tO verj-fy ownership and easements. If the proposal is l-ocated in a multi-family development which has a homeowners, assocj-ation, thenwritten approval from the association in support of theproject must abe. received by a duly authorized agentfor said association. Any additional material necessary for the review of theappJ-ication as cietermined by t.he zoning administ,rat,or. For j-nterior modifications, an improvement survey andsite plan may be waived by the zoning administ.raLor. IV. TIME REOUIREMENTS E. The Planning and Envj-ronmental Commission meets on the2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A completeapplication form and all accompanying material (asdescribed above) must be submitted a minimum of four(4) weeks prior to the date of the pEC public hearing.No incomplet.e applications (as determined by the zoningadministrator) wilt be accepted by the planning staffbefore or after the designated submittal date. A11 PEC approved variances shall lapse if construcLionis not commenced within one year of the date ofapproval and diligent.ly pursued to compleLion. If this application requires a separat.e review by anyIoca1, Stat.e or Federal agency other than the Town of Ylif, the application fee shall be increased by$200.00. ExampLes of such review, may includel buc arenot limited to: Colorado Department of Highway AccessPermits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. The applicant shal-l be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 50? oi ttreapplication fee. If, at the applicant,s requestr dnymatter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter robe re-published, t.hen, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant.. B. Av. B. "a. J;r 3:3:#fit; "o;:T:o"?;":ii"::l-5:: I il"1:l:oil::. ".other issues which may have a signiiicant impact on thecommunity may require review by consult.ants other thattown staff. Should a det.ermination be made by the townstaff that an outside consultant is needed to reviewany appl-ication, Community Development may hire anoutside consultant,, it. shall estimate the amount. ofmoney necessary to pay him or her and Lhis amount shal1be forwarded to the Town by the applicant. at the timehe files his application with the -ommunity DevelopmentDepartment. Upon complet,ion of t.he review of theapplication by the consultant, any of the fundsforwarded by the applicant for paymenl of theconsultant which have not been paj-d to Lhe consuJ_tancshall be returned to the appJ_icant. Expenses incurredby the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by theapplicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicant.within 30 days of notification by the Town. rt !..4 lilztt2 Rrocc 131995 Date of ApplicationDate of pEc Meetlno W TPPLICATIO}T FOR EXAERIOR AI,TERITIONSOR INODITTCIITONS IN COInIENCIAIJ CORE IVAIL \,|TLIACE Planning and Environmental commission review is reguired forthe alteration of an existin! urrrraitg wrrictr .ic"-o. removesany encl0sed ftoor area or outdoor pa[io or the ieplacementgI_ 31 9-11s9ins buildins tocared in tne ccr oisirict.FOLLOWING PEC APPROVAI, rNU PNO;NCT MUST BE _NrViiWEP BY ?HEDESIGN REVIEVI BOARD (DRB). allpltcttlon rLll not be ecceptcdfecl are c.hittad' Ke*r'i Zt; untll ell LnfonatLon (S.'e*t>nJ,> Bur-15 Rupp€sENTarrvs P^-"{,S; t>s,ft (E*te," f+,'ll) LEGAL DESCRTPTroN ?5tr-_tru(s_tr', I. The end A.NAME OF APPLICANT ADDP€SS r., tl, 1r. grr <r p B.NAME OF APPLICANT'S ADDRESS C. NAME OF OWNER(S) (print or STGNATURE (S) ADDRESS D. E.FEE x LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ADDRESS $200.00 (rEss $500.00 (MORE THAN THAN 100 sQ. FT.) 100 s0. rr.) rf!_Ill_lgsT BE pArD BEFORE rHE COMMUNTTY DEVSLOPMENTDEPARTMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. II. PRE_APPLTCATION CONFERENCE: A pre-application conference with a planning staff member isstrongr-y suggested to determine if airy addi[ionalinformation is needed- No appric"tioi, ri.rr u" a-".pt.aunless it is comptete (must include all items ,"di;;; bythe zoning administrar.or). Ir ts the ippit"""i;;---"- "responsibirily to rnake an.appointment wiln trre staff to flndout about additiona] submitlll requirements. III ' PTEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPLICATION WILL STREAIVILINE fHEAPPROVAL PRocEss FoE-Etn pnoJEcr By DEcREASTNG THE NUMBEROF CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PEC TI{AY STIPULATE. AI,ICONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIEO Witi-BEiOrG;BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED. THE FOTLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED: A. r.gr?ygT:nt. survey.gf.property showing property linesano rocation of buirding and any improvements on theland. 'i owNERs oF ALL pnopunry AD.IACENT To rHE suBJEcr pRopERTy TNCLUDING PROPERTY BE}IIND AND ACROSS STREETS. THEAPPTICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT MAILINGADDRESSES. 2- t7-q3 Subnit fcur (4) copies of a site plAlx containing thefoLlowifinfornation: O 1.The site plan shall be drawn on a sheet size of 24n x 36" at a scale of l-' = 20' showing exist.ing and proposed improvements to the site. Avariation of the sheet or scale may be approved bythe Corununity Development Department if Justified. The date, north arrow, scale and name of theproposed development with it, s legal descriptionshall be shown on ttre site plan. The existing topographic character of the siteincluding existing and proposed contours. The location and size of all existing and proposedbuildings, structures and improvements. The existing and proposed J-andscaping, patios,additions or deletions. A title report to verify ownership and easements. Preliminary building elevations, sections, andfloor plans, at a scale not smaller than one-eighth equals one footl in sufficient detail todetermine floor area, gross residential floorarea, interior circulation, Iocations of useswithin buildings, and the general scale and appearance of the proposed development. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. - '-'t . IV. THE APPLICAT.IT SHALL SUBMIT IN WRITTEN AND GRAP}IIC FORM A PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE PLAI{NING AI.ID ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION INDICATING THAT : A. THE PROPOSAL IS IN CONFORMANCE I'IITH THE PURPOSES OF THECCI DISTRICT AS SPECIFIED IN 18.24.010. B. THE PROPOSAL SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WIIH THE VAIL VILLAGE UPAAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN REGARDING: 1". Pedestrianization2. Vehicte penetrat,ion 3. Streetscape Frarnework4. Street Enclosure5. Street Edge6. Building Height7. Views8. Sun Shade Consideration Many of the above items should be addressed by graphic means, such as sketches, models (lncluding neighboringbuildings), photos, etc. If the applicant is proposing a major change to theVail village Urban Design Guide plan, the procedure forchanges are noted in Section 18.24.220(Bl . C. THE PROPOSAI IS COMPATIBLE WTTH THE CT1ARJACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE TOI'IN OF VAIL zONINc CODE FOR CCI ALSO DESCRIBES OTHER ZONING ISSUES THAT THE APPLICANT MUST RESPOND TO IN WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC FORM. VT. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR T,6AY DETERMINE THAT ADDITIONAT, MATERIAL IS NECESSARY FOR ?HE REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION. v. vrr. AppLrcATroNs rgR ExrERroR ArrEF"arroNS o*tor"rcATroNs rN CCI IWOLVING MORE THAN 1OO SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA ARE ONLY REVIEWED SEMI-A}INUAILY. THEY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED ON OR BEFORE THE TOURTH MONDAY OF T.TAY OR NOVEMBER. THE PEC HOLDS A PRELIMINARY REVIEW SESSION WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE SI'BMITTAL DATE. A PI'BLIC HEARING SHA],L BE HELD WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE PRELIMINARY REVIEW SESSION. APPLTCATIONS FOR THE AITERATION OF Ar.l EXISTING BUILDING THAT ADDS OR REMOVES ANY ENCLOSED FLOOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN 1OO SQUARE FEET II{AY BE SI'BMITTED AT THE REQUIRED TIME OF THE MONTH FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION (PEC) REVIEW. FOR MORE spEcrFrcs oN THE REVTEW SCHEDULE, SEE SECTTON L8.24.065(A5). VTII. YOUR PROPOSAL WILL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WTTH VAIL'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. If this application requires a separate review by anylocaI, State or Federal agency other than the Tohrn ofVail, the application fee shall be increased by$200.00. Examples of such review, may J-nclude, but arenot limited to: Colorado Department of Highway AccessPermj.ts, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. The applicant shall be responsible for paying anypublishing fees which are in excess of 50* of theapplication fee. If, at the applicant's request, anymatter is postponed for hearing, causing the matt.er tobe re-published, then, the entire fee for such re-publication shall be paid by the applicant. Applications deemed by the Community Development Department to have significant design, land use orother issues which may have a significant impact on the community may require review by consultants other thattown staff. Should a determination be made by the townstaff that an outside consultant is needed to review any application, Cornmunity Development may hire anouLside consultant, it shall estimate the amount of money necessary to pay him or her and this amount shallbe forwarded to the Town by the applicant at. the timehe files his application with the Community DevelopmentDepartment. Upon compfetion of the review of theapplication by the consultant, any of the fundsforwarded by the applicant for payment of theconsultant which have not been paid to the consultantshal-I be ret.urned to the applicant. Expenses incurredby the Town in excess of the amount forwarded by theapplicant shall be paid to the Town by the applicantwithin 30 days of notification by the Town. A.rx. B. PARADICM DESIGN BIJUTS ENCLOSURE ADDITION PROaIECT STAfEilEI{! This addition is to the core Creek Drive ground level side of the core creek Plaza Building. Its purpose is to increase the size of the space available for grease and solid waste containers for several restaurants. This has been needed and requested by the Town of Vails Environmental Hea1th Departrnent. The size of the building enclosure wj-Il be approximately 60 sf. VTEI{ CORRIDOR AIIAI.,YSISThis addition does not inpact any of the Villagers adopted view corridors. The addition is between the Gore Creek Plaza Building and the Sitzrnark Building. Tt will line up with the front face of the Gore creek Plaza Building and be constructed of the same materials. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONSIn terms of urban design, this addition will not inpact adversely the pedestrians, vehicle penetrations, streetscape framework' street enclosure, street edge, building beight or vielts. This building addition is in conpliance with the zoning code. The architectural design will strive to fit in with the Gore Creek Plaza Building and surrounding area of the Village. ARCHITECTURE PLANNINC INTERIORS P.O. BOX 73I VAIL, COLORADO 81658 303-476-6397 o I I-,AND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANYDated ;Ianuary 09, L99ZCase V1785Policy OO0O OWNER AND ENCIJ}TBRANCE REPORT cHARcE $75.0O That. according to the indicee of the county Recorder of EAGLECounty Colorado, relatlve to the foLlowing reaL property: COUr'IERCIAL cONDoI.lINIul.l UNITS A AND C, GORE CREEK PLAZA coNDOltfNIUIitAccoRDrNG To rIlE coNDol-lrNrltu l.tAp THEREOF rrLED FoR REcoRD AND AsDEFINED IN THE coNDot-IINItM DECL'ARATIoN RECoRDED SEPTEIiBER 16, L9TLIN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 698 AND AI,IENDI{ENT THERETO RECORDED OCTOBER 27,1971 IN BOOK 222 AT PAGE 74, COtNTy OF EAGL,E, STATE OF COLORADO. A. The recorded owner of said real property is: CHARLES H. ROSENQUIST B. There are no mortgages or deeds of Trust, Federal Tax Liens,AseoclatLon Ll"ens, JudgmentB or l,lechanLc Liens which purport toaffect said real property, other than the following: DOCt,l,lENT RECORDED SEPTEI{BER 29, 1982 IN BOOK 346 AT PAGE 575 No information Ls furnished herein with respect to covenants,conditl-ons, restrictions, easements, or real estate taxes and assessments. This certificate is dated to include the 9TH day of .IANUARY, L992. TITLE INSI'RANCE COI.IPANY OF I,TINNESOTA By:autffigent I,AND TITI-,E GUARANTEE CO. 1O8 South Frontage Road l{estSuite 2o3Vail, Colorado 81657 Phone - 476-225L Llability of the company under this amount of charge, ENDORSE}IENT OE certificate is linited to Representing Title Insurance conpany of l{lnnesota n,.f l.rr l0 ' ,"lt'rr lrl i. I ,,it h5 lll lnr Pl'f rtr.'tllr' tn" : .,. I,rrtlr,l tr,Ara l.rrl' l'' "73 i': - .t .r,lli nnl'*lq '1" 'r'" 'r'rl l" lr,llr lt ,1,. tr'.txlt,,ll :t, l.r',{nrrlll lrl l(,1'.t,vt r{' tll la r1fi.,, Ql ' (tl l'lrl",r lllIttl .rl Irest, i1'-\, ,, LOpy or nir,, Available n'r{ lSgt rvnrrr Lr'' _ir,,.!, }-..rt _rr.,,rr!.r n. 1.u.,6 ,a rt, r,.t Cl ll.ll t . tt, rt lt .l,,.'-ui rf c,lo.,rr *'--l:tBlr -- . ' r'nl|'rn'r'{! h'nt t}rnntl'r n rrrrrl ^|l.IltI,th.Fr'..FrttxrFn.rr!..|,drrtlr|t.t.i'll.r'.||t.n".I{J.'|rxir.n,t...{n.n!.',|(l.l',|r|.0tr|F..|.1''|.'..rr.. .",*irF.'i: !i,ir, .r^r.r l,r!,.,tl1,,,r . r .r tt 7ll . rnrt. rlilrr.rr. frr't,.rroi "l th' I I t rr'lrr'r"{'rlr _'(rtlt r-t'r t,'i;T"it-;.ff;J;;;;'.";;;'i"""'\"'r"tr'na.dt"r'|'r'|'rrr'rr'''|!\r :'r"rr r"' I rr"v'rrrrrr ::.,;;;';.,ii'.;';rlr|rr"rt,kn.rrrrdt.t|l'.!,.r.!|'a'',l|'nln.4{I lrl t gl.tir-..Vtrtt lll lr'.r'l nl n'.{ llot':Vnll; c:(l fl | c'lt "r..$it.tti..l itnFtt r" '!rl1" nlt l'r nitr 't rr''r Inh{ i in rll. i,li ti I.,| . . lrl rn ,, ,,. ,.{ | -.J r"lr .. t.Jth r...,1r, '(: . ..,r, I P,!,, ( trtr '."r il1il#Ji[:,il':::11:i:11,'J:"11j:i';;:ilj)il:;i'j'il:::*:":l:,';:.'l:.;;l':,,"::;:i ;]t:,U,1'il irt.r'.xts N u4 tn-I-r' ,rt. ,tr ,r,,n ".r, h.,r, .{.1 .,,i . ,.111.11 ,4 -r ,;'t ir 'F(rl rlF "r'r t" r't ''ll r"r' ] t'ldi r'l'nrI '- - ttti'rr' ntlhl It rhl lln'\'h'lt lr-!"t"r dJlrr'rnrntltrllttl, tU.--.- * .,;.al'|" 'r"or' lHi:iffiil,;':l|.ji'l''u"''"r''r'r'*'u"rnr' rrtl..rr'r'"t'ntrttt"r'rr''''rr/r''rn'tr'&nt.n'nr'rrr\s'r"n{" i,r*..,ut,',"'r.r,ri$'lli'rr"i""!i' 'r'tv}r7? ' ar rt'r rrw'tri '4 J1":{'l)'l)l) I , Al rli litrl'td'.'l tlt ntl'nr.'tai't'{t { tr''r{'t'tl" " "tn aut'r rt"tt'nr i{ '| ' !"!' l"lhr rr'li' r rt' rrrtr"tt {ii i'-'L !:i i),;q "'";'jlj'L',11. ru..*,. '.. .. - -llur'crL :l"P4rcri'r't , o nt<trlt, r'r rirrr.''it.-|rtttrit'Fin ril h' t! t'rtu'(' n I h .lrtf.br.'.,",1, /ir,i}.lr. r. .-"" 'I /,4at,r,aiu, ... .. r"'.I'1. ; ,i'- , aA /c,/ ,"/], /:-,(// / t' '/'7 ) .r(!t.J : i.t .j A prrt ofCounty, C Co![tcneln 66ola . oo.Ul. 13 t. TRUE POII}f..l to rlrrct r,8l.lt f..rgouth 79o:l!,n. of rl I *fu#ff J- r:;-== !Z'_. -r rl fr || aat 3.i;2= 9 .E -i!'rE-tr::l0il idtF--,.t' i !Jr - 6 i8555{P -. . r.- == !!=Ee9 .a6 .-.:-l-'-!!.- 9+l F:- -':f g g ll !,i l' I-| 5 I 3srfl,i i !';:l_'al 'i' I Ig i$|.I a s\ sa '{ '.*\\J FF\) Tr?trn al | | 3 t o PARADICM DESICN INTERIORS AI'JACENT The Lodge Sitzmark Creekside Bell Tower PROPERTY OTNERS TO GORB CREEX PIIAUA BUIIIDING Lodge Properties Inc. L74 E. core Creek DriveVail, ,Co 81657 Sitzmark at Vail Inc. 183 core Creek DriveVail, co 81657 Creekside Condos Charles Rosenquist P.O. Box 686Vail, Co 81658 Bell Tower Associates fnc. 300 Crescent Court 6th FloorDallas, Tx 752OL la*ier *r<JbJar \t\io'ul Ycwl .) CO sr 8l b67 \zlz-z-[q3- OO_pcq-,rr.S S$_r1- O-\r el.) \aul cll ^ "d-5 Kt"r ou}d\\ ARCHITECTURE PLANNINC P.O. BOX 73I VAIL, COLORADO 81658 303-476-6397 5+ THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearingin accordance with Section 18,66,060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on January 10, 1993, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. ln consideration of: 1. A request for a minor subdivision and an amendment to a previously approved development plan and a conditional use permit for four Type lll employee housing units at The Vail Swim and Tennis Club, 2893 Kinnickinnick Road/a porlion of the SW 1/4, Section 14, T5S R81W of the 6th P.M., Town of Vail, Colorado. Applicant: T. Charles Ogilby and Stanteigh H. CotePlanner: Shelly Mello 2. A request for a major amendment to SDD #4, Atea D, to allow an expansion to the Glen Lyon Ofiice Building located at 1000 South Frontage Road WesVLot 45, Block K, Glen Lyon Subdivision. Applicant: Paul M. DeBoer, representing Calumet Federal Savings and LoanPlanner: Shelly Mello 3. A request for a worksesslon to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at 580 S. Frontage Road Easyan unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical CenterPlanner: Andy Knudtse 4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Ftoad and 383 Beaver Dam Circle/Lots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vait Viilage 3rd Filing. Applicant: John Tyler/John Tyter, Jr./Robert TylerPlanner: Shelly Mello . A request for a minor exlerior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom ArmstrongPlanners: Randy Stouder/Shelly Mello 6. A request for an approval of the master plan to allow for an expansion and renovation of the Town of Vail Public Works site located at 1309 Vail Valley Drive/an unplatted parcel located north of the l-70 right-of-way, immediately north of Vail Village 8th Filing. 7, 8. A notification of approval of a minor SDD amendment to allow for a change in building location and building height located at 1335 Westhaven Drive/Lot A, Millrace lll Subdivision. Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Applicant: Planner: Town of Vail Andy Knudtsen Michael Lauterbach Jim Curnutte Town of Vail Andy Knudtsen Leo Palmer Mike Mollica A request to amend Section 18.69.050 - Special restrictions for developments on lots where the average slope of the site beneath the proposed structure and parking area is in excess of thirty percent in single family residential, two-family residential, and two- family primaryisecondary residential zones to allow the standards ot this section to apply to the Hillside Residential zone district. 9.A notification of approval of a minor SDD amendment to allow for the addition of an airlock entry to the Gateway Building/Lot N, Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing/l2 Vail Road. Applicant: Planner: e *THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18-66.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on February 14, 1994, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of: 1. A request for a minor subdivision located at 363 Beaver Dam Road and 383 Beaver Dam Circleilots 2 & 3, Block 3, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: John Tyler/John Tyler, Jr.iRobert TylerPlanner: Mike Mollica z. A lequtisl, l(.,I a wotfiscsstutl iut a talor vL,lr d^rt'ttut drr('tir,rtulr i1r lri srrluilLh vciiril.rled to the Lionshead Center Building to allow for the expansion of the Vail Associates offices located at 520 Lionshead Mall/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates, Inc. Planner:Andy Knudtsen 3. A request for a worksession for a major CCll exterior alteration and setback variance lo allow for the expansion of dwelling units at the Lionshead Center Building located at -_---_qfl--Lionshead Mall, Units 208,209,308 and 309/Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing-_-------- - ----__.\ Applicant: Victor Cano Faro, Transcon Investments, Inc., and Jose Luis Chain Andy Knudtsen 4. A request for a minor subdivision located at 4316 Streamside Circle WesVlots 2 and 3, Block 4, Bighorn 4th Addition. Applicant: Walter Kirsch' Planner:Randy Stouder 5. A request for a conditional use to allow for a Type ll Employee Housing Unit to be located at 1358 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 21 , Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing. Planner: Appticant: Planner: Chris Kempf Randy Stouder 6. A request for a worksesslon to discuss proposed text amendments to Chapter 18.38, Greenbelt and.Natural Open Space District; Chapter 18.32, Agricultural and Open Space District; and Chapter 18.36, Public Use District of the Vail Municipal Code. Applicant Town of Vail Planner:Jim Curnutte 7. A request for a worksession for a major CCI exterior alteration to allow for the redevelopment of the Covered Bridge Building located aI227 Bridge StreeVLots C and D and a part of Lot B, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and East West Partners Planner: Mike Mollica 8. A request for an SDD to allow for the redevelopment of the Cornice Building and a conditional use for the off-site relocation of three existing employee housing units, located at 362 Vail Valley Drive and more specifically described as follows: . A part of Tracr "B" and a part oF Mill creek Boad, Vail Village, First Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: r.irrlr'1r,.'! rrr.r -, It,r: ,,,,, ','; ,.,. ,,r,-,.,2.i '{r,i.,' t, ., -.',- ,',t soulherly Ine of u.s. Highway No, ii a dlslance af 3b7.0ti leet ro tne llortneast cornef ol saro i racr 't' ; lhence douth .|0"14'OO' West along the Easterly line of said Tract "B"; a distance of 198.31 feel to lhe Southeasterly corner of said Tract "8"; thenca North 79o48'00" Wesl along the Soulherly line of sajd Tract "B" a dislance of 100.00 feet to the 1rue point of beginning thence north 09"10'07" West a dislance of 41.67 feel: thence Souh 8827'11' West a dislance of 75.21 feet; thence South 27'13'37" Easl of dislance of 77,37 feet; thence North 57o24'00" East a distance of 55.11 feet, more or less to the true point of beginning. Applicant: David Smith Planner: Jim Curnutte. 9. A request to modify the landscaping plan associated with the previously approved exterior alteration proposal for the SlifelBuildingffiO-Blid-ge StreeUPartif'tols B and C, Block 5, Vail Vilfage lstFiling. /// Applicanfi Rod and Beth Slifer Planner: Kristan-PriE 10. A request for a minor subdivision and to rezone a tract from Primary/Secondary Residential to Low Density Multi-Family, located at 2850 Kinnickinnick Road/more specifically described as follows: A pard d b||d h the Souhvr€sl Ou.ne. of Se.iion 14. Toltnshh 5 south. Rsn$ El wed ol lhe 6lh Pdnclpd M€.idhn, mor| pstlculstly d€sctbed |. lollorvs: Beginning al . potnt wtrenco a br.sg c.p set to. r wltne3g comgr lgr lhs W€rt Qu1tcr ol 'dd Sedion 14 b€|€ (Nonh 29 degnft 28 tnlnlnes 51 secoodt Well to73.Crg led Deed) (Nonh 43 D€9r.eE 15 minlll€3 02 re€onds West,915.98test Moasursd): Thence North 74 degre€g 05 mhutes 19 sgconds E.rt. t0.76 tldi lhenEs 183.62!€et slong thg arc of a qrn a to th9 dgttr whlch :rs sub.n& a chod beerin! f.lonh 88 deg,ees 12 mhut9s 30 sacords Eesl. 181.7€ teet lhence Sotrrh I' degc.€ ,00 mintnes 21 seconds East 62,77 teet lhence 147.{i} teet 31ofl9 $e ..c ot a qrwr lo ths lefr whidr.ts st$lend3 r chord b€rrint Nodh 86 degrgg! 36 Dhuteg l? second! Ealt 145.60 le€r; TheEg Noith 70 degreeg 52 mlrure3 5'5 seconds Ea!t, ,Oe55 feeq Thence 5,t 1 0 leet 3rong the .rc ol a cirwe !o rhe dgh htri$ arc eubtend€ r drod bearing South it7 degreF A, minrda! 37 $cond! E.st ,1,{.20 lr3l; Thence Soulh til degrees 25 nlnutes 50 seconds Wail 1t0.51 leeti Thonca South 68 degrees 18 minulgs 9l gecohds Wrsl, 320'm l€el; lben€ Norlh lt degresi 07 mlnul€6 05 3econds West, 50.00 t€el: Thenas Sotjth 77 degrees 48 mlnue3 4l seonds Wesl 160'18leel: Thence Sodh 10 degre$ |ll rnlnuli! 33 .econdi West, 36,19 teel; Thrn6 l,lorth 87 degrees 40 mlnule! 06 seeoids l4tesl 337.72leel; Th€ncs (ttodh 1l deg.Ees 52 mhules 13 seconds Ec! 130.m leet Ueed) Nonh 'l I degr.er 5!i lnlrrJlsr 3l second8 Easi. 129.?5 loel Mearuted) lo fir POINT OF SEGINNING, Berring lton c.LO..ecordlor Soutfi hdt ol Sedlon lnabcl efi Sedbns l+fs. (G.L.O. recofd Soulh 01 degrees 30.2 mlnutes Esst) (Sourh 0l deg,ee3 38 minulst 32 geooodg Easl Me$ursd) Aoolicant: Juanita l. Pedofto 'l 1. A request for a minor exterior alteration and a site coverage variance to allow for an enclosed trash and grease dumpster at the southwest corner of the Gore Creek Plaza Building, specifically located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Block 5-B, VailVillage 1st Fiting. Applicant Charles Rosenquist, represented by Kevin Clair and Tom ArmstrongPlanners: Randy Stouder/Shelly Mello 12. A request to relocate the helipad to the east end of the Ford Park parking lot located at 580 S. Frontage Road EasUan unplatted parcel located between Vail Village 7th Filing and Vail Village 8th Filing and a portion of the l-70 right-of-way. Annlicent. \/.rif \/2ltr.rrr f\lndinnl eontar.-:,r.,<r,iire,. ;rrrvy i..rruvr.,v,, -,';ijLI; l;;;:;ii;;;:L'.' 13. A request for preliminary plat approval of a major subdivision (Trappers Run) on Lots 16, 19 and 21, Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West, generally. located north of l-70 and west of the Vail Ridge Subdivision. Applicant: John Ulbrich, represented by Gateway DevelopmentPlanner: Jim Cumutte TABLED TO THE MARCH 14,1994 , 'LANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL i coMMlssloN MEETING / ---tt' \\- MEM@RANDUM Sitzmark Dumpster file Paul J. Reeves. Environmental Health Officer 12t17t93 Notes on lhe 12/14 meeting and resultant conversations Prior to the above noted meeting, I spoke with Ken from National By-Product on December 13 .@ 10:00am. We discussed the issue and he informed me that there were really only a couple options for him. lf the new building is constructed he could put two of the existing sized units (32 x72), or one larger unit in place (44 x72). This would allow for the same schedule to be utilized. The other option is for the grease to be picked up more otten, however this would obviously cost the customers more money. The meeting was at Sweet Basil and the persons present were Kevin Clair (Sweet Basil), T.J. Armstrong (Blu's), Bob Fritch (Sitzmark Lodge), Tom (Polo shop), Russ Forrest and myself. Norman Laskin (John Gault) was invited but declined to attend. We discussed the problem and several options for solving the problem. There were several ideas generated that were for one reason or another were dismissed. The idea of the restaurants doing all of the cleaning was determined to be unfair due to the fact that they. are not the sole responsible parties. Kevin and T.J. admitted that they generale the putresclble portion of the waste that causes the odor problem, but everyone using the building played a role. The problem seems to stem from the fact that by the time the restaurant waste is put into the building (mostly late at night, but to some extent throughout the day) the containers are full, and the food wastes "overflow'. The possibility ol holding lhe waste inside until morning when the dumpsters are empty was discussed, but this is not a good option from a food service establishment sanitation stand point. We discussed the new structure for housing the grease bins, and the fact that this would open up some new usable space in the building. This resultant space could be used for a "corrugated Only" recycling container. Tom indicated some concern about insuring that the materid is actually recycled, and not just mixed with the resl of the trash. We also discussed the fact that the containers and building needed to be steam cleaned, and that BFI sometimes spills material and does not pick up after themselves, thereby compounding the problem. One potential solution was to hire a person from Vail Property Management to clean the area daily, paid for by all parties using the building. 12115119931 called Steve McSpadden to discuss the possibility ol some of his workers being paid to clean the structure daily. There was some concern due to staffing shortages and the fact that this would not solve the problem. Steve said he would be happy to talk to Bob about some sort of arrangement, 12/16/1993 | called Bob back to tell him about my conversation with Steve. Bob said that he would call Steve to discuss the issue. On December 17 at about 8:15 am Doug from BFI returned my call (of 12l10). We talked about the issue of spillage and he said he would wrile a note to the drivers to use extra care when servicing the building to be sure any spillage was cleaned up. He also told me that he would order three new dumpsters to be placed in the building. In addition, once the grease was out of the building he could spot a 2yd box for "flattened corrugated only" that would be recycled. To: From: Date: RE: ) PI.ANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 27, 1992 Present Greg Amsden Jeff Bowen Chuck Crlst Diana Donovan Kathy Langenwalter Dalton Williams Gena Whitten Staff Kristan Pritz Shelly Mello Mlke Mollica Tim Devlin Andy Knudtsen Mary Caster The meeting was called to order at 2:45 p.m. by Ghairperson Diana Donovan. Public Hearino 1. A request for a conditional use permit and a slte coverage variance to allow lor th€ expansion ol an existing outdoor dining deck for Srveet Basil Restaurant, 193 Gore Greek Drive, part of Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Kevin ClairPlanner: Shelly Mello Shelly presented the request to the Commission. She stated the main concems of the staff were the provision of additional landscaping, fie locations for the use of charcoal paverc and the deck railing material. Ned Gwathmey, representing the applicant, adclressed the Commission reviaring he proposal. He stabd that the applicant agreed with all of the staff's recommendations with he exception of the railing and landscaping. There was discussion regarding the pavlng around the deck as far as pavers versus the asphalt presently there. lt was agreed that the pavers should replace the asphalt for a more uniform look. A discussion followed regarding the planting of a tree In the planter in the southwest planter area. Kevin Clair, the applicant, felt a tree planted in front of his door would deter customers from entering his establishment. After some discussion, it was agreed by the appllcant and the Commission to plant two trees on either side of the business in the two 'notches" of ths planter not yet indicated on the plans. After further question, Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve the roquest with the inclusion of the tree solution and the use of pavers around the soldier course to be included per the staff memo. Greg 16=6"n seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-2, with Kathy Langenwalter and Diana Donovan voting against the motion because they did not believe public dining decks should be located on public land and that there was private land to expand the deck onto. 2- A request to amend a condition of a previously approved exterior alteration, regading the CCI parking pay{n-lieu fee for the Red Lion Building, located at 304 Bridge StreeuLots E, F, G and H, Block 5A, Vail Viilage First Fiting. Applicant: Vencura,Ltd/JayPetersonPlanner: Mike Mollica 'a I O I W{eol^ an dJCV_ A ,,,oJn*,,, ffi W_*P.,.:ffi#f pranntngardEnvimnnemtoonnissiqr W Wb Vl44 g community Developncnr owanmenr =fft fa - fnfh D-''fl PLfrntyzT.ree2 uu "tr€lvv\A uql Wnd,SCAe A Equest ror a conditionat use permit to allow t*PgB?'*'l#i6fr\ O*e'| outdoor dining decL at Sweet Basil Restaurant 193 Gore Cteek DdvetPut of I,ot A, Block 58, Vail Village Fir$ Aing. n frli , t c.l ,nnlnn F t-Ond4,,,r Sf rnervtk t-o WYA)uf TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECI: Applicann Kevin OairPtanrn Shelly llello I' IJ\Llvw q rYA''t v D"'Z- Thc ryplicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow For an outdoor dining deck at SweeiBasil's Restaururt locaed in the Gore Creek Plaza building in Vail Village. The Gorc Cteek Plaza Building is in the Commercial Core I zone disfiict, which requires a conditiond use pemit to add an outdoor dining deck. The deck is pmposed to be located along the south elevation of ttr€ Gorc Crpek Plaza Building, and would be located partially upon public right-of-way. The deck would be srpanded a maximum of 4 feet to ttre east oa the applicant's property ard 6.5 feet to the south on the Town rightof-way for a otal of 122.5 q, ft. of additional dect( ar€a Approximarcly 80 sq. ft. of tln deck is pmposed to be m the public right-of-way. 3-4 four person tables will be located on the additiorul dert area The height of the deck is appoximately 24 inches above grade. The planter in fiont of the deck is 16 inctrc.s high as measled fron the su€et 8rade. Ttrerc is no pa*ing fee associated with thls type of project VrAryg 4 ryVo{ The applicant has also poposed steetscape imp'rovements with this applicuion They indude: l. Additional landscaping in the exising plurtcr located bctneen the John Galt enry ard the Gore Creek Plaza Building enry - I spruce ard several shnrbs. An additional planter to the south of the exi*ing planter. The stone will match the existing slone on the building. 2, A 16 - 18 tnch high srone planter wall, exterding eart-west dong the fiont of the deck and also north-south for a portion ofrhe deck adjacent o the rcstaurant entry, will be insta[ed and mahtained by the property owner. Tlr slorp will match the existing stone on fre building. 3. Ctrarcoal gray paveN on private poperty, with the double soldier course at the property line, and running djacern to $e deck expursion wherc the deck c,msses the prcpetty line are proposed. No paven ale proposed in the "community" dumpoter arca to tbe wcst of the buiiding nor ary they proposed to the east of tbe dec,k orpursion betneen lhe deck and the Bell Tower Building. I J4. Granite pavers arc Foposed for the main entry to the Gore Cheek Plaza Building ard Sweet Basil o march those at ttle tohn Gdt entry. 5. A decorative metal railing will be located amund ttre perimeter of tre dectc Plarter boxes will be located on the railings during the sunmer months. U. BACKGROT]ND On Jurp 23, 1992, the Towlr Coruril 4proved tlre ap'plicant's rcquest to oroceed throudr ttre olannins Dmcess for g corditional use permit. This initial rymval was rBquired because a portion of the pmposed impmvements for the deck cxpansion would bc located wilhin tre public rightof-way. ln 1990, owners of Sweet Basil Resaumt rcquest€d to expand dre deck on tlrc south side of the Gore Creek Plaza building adjacent to Gorc Creek Drive. The Council denied the Equest based on the staff rccommendation. At that time, the suff recommended denial of ttre request and dirccted tlre applicant to rcapply once the Transportation Master Plan and the Sueetscape Master Plsr were ryroved by the Town Council. It was felt ttrat the information from these documents was critical in reviewing this application. With the completion of the Master Transportation Plan and Stneebcape Plan, the owrEn arc again seeking permission b expand the deck- III. RELATED POLICIES IN THE VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESIGN GT'IDE PI,A}I AND THE VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PI"AN Therc arc no specific Vail Village Uftan Design Guide Ptan subar€a concepts whictr apply o this proposal. However, the Vail Village Desigt Considerations specificatly address decks and patios as follows: "Dining decks and patios, when prcpedy desigrred and sited, bring people O the sueets, opportunities o look and be looked at, and generally confibute to tlre liveliness of a busy sreet-making a rictrer pedestrian experience than if those str€ets wer€ emFy. A review of successful deckspatios in Vail reveals several common characteristics: - dircct sunligbt from ll:0G3:0 incrcases use by many dayVyear and protccts fiom wind; - elevated 2 feet lo give views @ tlrc pedesuian walk (and not the rcverse); - physical separation ftom pedesrian walk of 3-5 feet (planter beuer than a wallX - overhang gives pedestrian scale./shelter. Decks and patios should be sitcd and designed with due corsideration o: vieun- pedestian activity" The Vail Village Muter Plan does rpt contain any specific subarca concepc whictr dircctly rclate to tltis ptoposal. However, ttr staff bclieves dut fie following goals and objectives, as stated in the Vail Village Master Plarl arc relevant to this pmposal "$93!.,1fL - Encourage high quality rcdcveloparen while preserving thc unique architectural scale of the Village h order to sustain is seruc of community and identity. 12 Objectlve: Encorage the upgrading ard rcdwelopment of resideruial and ommercial facilities. Goal #2 - To foster a suong tourist industry and promoe year-amrnd econdmlc health and viability for the Village ard for the connunity as a whole. 22.1 Policy: Ttr design cdteda in thc Vail ViUage Utbm Desiglr Gutde Plro shall bc ttc primary gurdlns doctment to preserre the existing architec$rdl scale and character of the core arca of Vail Villaga 3 .,l.VAlt nq X 0W, Jrtfihan/, 4o enitw bpile < .lnbrella or e+her elenen'l {or uhr anl aale ,bnl+cepe ercl&ure 1 huffx to$ h li*. 2.4 Objective: Encourage the dwelopment of a variety of new commercial activity wherc compatible with exising land uses. 2.42 Policy: Aclivity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both tlr gues and the community shall be encour4ged. Goal #3 - To recognize as a top priority the enhancement of thc walking cxpcrience, tuougbout the Village. 3.1 ObJectlve: Physically impmve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. 3.1.1 Pollcy: hivate developurent projecrs shall incorporate sfieetscape imprcvemenn (such as paver [EaEnerlts, landscaping, lighting and seating arcas), along adjacent pedestrian ways. 33 Objective: Encourage a wide variety of activities, events, and sEeet life along pedestrian ways and plazas. 333 Policy: Outdoor dining is an imponant str€etsqpe feature and shall be encouraged in commercial infill or redevelopnent projeca. Goal #6 - To ensure the continued improvement of ttre vital operational elemeils of the Village. 622 Policy: Minor improvements Qandscaping, decorative paving, open dining decks, erc.), may be permitted on Town of Vail land or right-of-way (with rcview ard approval by the Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission when applicable) provided that Town operations such as snow removal, sheet maintenance and firc departnent access and operation are able to be maintained at ctrn€nt levels. Special desigr (i.e, hearcd pavemert), maintenanoe fees, or other considerations may be rcquir€d to offset impac$ on Town seryices." * '[be Strcetscape and Master Transportation Plans arc discussed urder the Criaria and Findings Section of the memo. ry.CRIT€RIA AND FINDINGS The following are tlp criteria and findings which shall be utilized during the review of this corditimal use permit. Upon review of Section 18.60, the Community Developurent Departnent recommends appmval of the conditional use permit based upon the following facton: Consideration of Facton : l. Relatlonship and impact of the use on the developnrent objectves of the Town. As stated in the zoning code, the Commercial Corc I (CCI) Zone District is intended !o "provide sites and maintain the unigue character of the Vail Village commercial area" with its mixmrc of lodges and commercial establishments in a prcdominantly pedestrian environment. The CCI district is intended to insure adeguate lighl air, open space and other amenities appropriate to permitted fypes ofbuildings and uses. The district regulations in accordance wift tlrc Vail Village U6an Desigrr Guide Plan and Design Considerarions prescribe site development standards that arc interded to hsue the maintenance ard presewation of the tightly clustered anangement of buildings ftonting on pedestrianways and public grc€nways, and to insurc continuation of the building scale ad architecnrral qualities that distinguish the Village." The staff believes that the applicanr's proposal complies with the Vail Village U6an Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan as indicated in Section III of this memorandum. V/e believe that outdoor dining decks, associated wilh a restauran! are an appropriate site development in the Village core. The Foposed improvements are consistent with the objectives and plans ofthe recently adopted Streetscape Master Plan ard the Masrcr Transportation Plan. 2. The effec't of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilitles, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facititieg and other public facilities needs It is the staffs opinion that the proposed outdoor dining deck will have no negative effects upon any ofthe above listed criteria- 3. Effec{ upon traflic with particular referencr to congestion, automotlve and pedestrian safety and conveniencg traffic flow and contml, rccess, maneuverabilitn and rernoval of snow ftom the street and parklng ereas fie staff finds tha $is pplication will not impaa any of the abwe cdteria. The minimum su€et width will be mairuained so as !o allow snow removal, loading on the south side of the street as well as emergency services. Putflic Works and the Firc Department have approved the design The deck 4. expansion is cmpatible with the parting and loading plan presenteA in ne Masler Transponation Plan. Efiec't upon the drarrcter of the area ln whlch the proposed usc ls to be locate4 including the scale and bulk ofthe proposed use ln rdation to nrrrounding uses. Since tttc PEC wo*session held on luly 13, 19Dr2.- fie applicrt has revised ttrc proposal. The clunges include the intrcduction of an additional planter betwe€n the John Galt entance and the Gore Clreek Plaza Building entrance, as well as a planter along the south and west sides of the pmposed deck expansion. Thc *aff finds these to be positive additions to tle pmject We do, however, beterre ttnt a clumb of aspens should be added to tfu ponion of the parter along the x,est side of the dedr, as well as adding a chrmp of aspen to the east side of ttrc planner (venus a sin$e omamental uee rs proposed on the east conre,r of the deck). We believe this landscaping will sften thc comen ofthe deck and blend well with the adjac€nt propery's landscaping. We understand the owner's conoems about shade and blocking vienrs ftom the deck. However, we believe the aspens will add muctr rpeded landscaping. Their open cimopy, should not create too much shade on thc deck. As proposed, the aprplicant has rclocated the bick paver soldier surse to exend along ttp propeny line and adjacent to the deck where it crosses the propefiy line in accordance wittr the Sfeetscape Mast€r Plan The charcoal grey brick paven, originally proposed to be tocated adjacent to tlrc dumpster facility, (to ttre west of ttre Gore Creek Plaza Building) and those east of the decft, have been delercd frosl the prcposat. The staff fuids that it is important that the charcoal pavers be installed as initially poposed in the area to the east of the deck expansion md rhe soldier course be located along tbe Foperty line in this arca" The staff believes that the removal of the brick pave$ to the west of the building in the "community" dumpster area adjacent to the Siematt as initially proposed is acceptable. We believe the applicant's prcposal to pave is sufficient as long as the alley ana between the Bell Tower Building and Gore Crcek Plaza Building is zurfaced with pavers. The rock wall on the west end of John Galt pmvides a gmd point for erding the paven. Granite pavers matching those at the south Iohn Galt entrance will be used for the entry to the building ard restauranl The soff firds that tlrcse changes will have a positive impact on the character of the area. The combination of additional planting and paving are consistent with the objectives and plans of the Sreescape Master Plan. B. " Findinss The Ptanrdng and Enviptm€ntal Commission shall make dre followinq findines before srantine a corditional usc p€flniU That the prcposed location of tlre use in accord sith tbe prrposes of this Ordinarrcc ard the prryoses of ttre district in which the site is locatcd. That the proposd location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detimental to tbe prblic health, safety, or wclfare or mat€rially injurious to propenies or irnpvements in the vicinity. That &e ploeosod use would cmply with each of thc aplicable pmvisims of this Ordinane. V. STAFFRECOMMENDATIONS The saff finds that the deck expansion along wilfi ftc stcetscape improvements will be positive iurpmvements for the area The combination of the improvements are consistent wi$ tre objectives of the Vail Village Urban Desigrr Considerations, SfieeEcaIF Master l,lart Vait Village ldaster Plan, and tlp Vsil MasterTruNportation Plan We believe the nquest meets all ttrc findings for a conditional use. Tlp saff recommends appmval of the conditional use permit rcquest with tlrc following conditions: 2. 3. -n,' ,l nor,I-' A clump of aspen u€qs be added to the planter west of the deck and a clump of aspen be added in the planrcr ont the southeast comer (versus an omarnental tr€e as prcposed); Charcoal brick paven be used, as initially pmposed, to the east of the deck expansion between the Bell Tower Building and the Gore Creek Plaza Building; and The DRB review the railing detail and considerthe uw of a more deorative railtury and planter box sptem. They should also caretully review the tlpe of shrub being proposed in the planter arcas \ffim^6 C|}SOI,GMOSSWEEISIIS.?lt Dronna -Ffe aruJ- b WWrl ^Vto-TM rAL DL' , )T4^I/^1, al-t)n tlf \prtt-d C\, I.dtil' I !i'--{ $L l-'l l$: {$$h.:$$$ \+il \N i! tn ii ii:iiiiii I $o I 9l {-hr$.c.,' rl --:t Ll '.1('t Ix\ftt{fl,{, ,l .r. I fl\ ii, \s: . ----a il$l i \J| { $t .|f ? I .! I A ;F:0 al $ .P\ \ tss-s *)ts\ riil s \.\\ d 7{..tt{ \, I.r J ii{ iii e[] Iii{. rIiitlnitiirri\+ $n ET *g f{ ifrji *' iii ;01 t i,i- lli.irsi JJ $J t- $ lrI /itt t\ o $t ir$ $lF Fi$ $rt L-) a :llr $il i}il ?-IiIiI tLl; *l l,$,ti flli$i tri$tit I'+ I\ F 1tt Isi1tir ilui ,:Fsil r .*l s.,! )$ $uI i}r* .-Lt+ h1z t,ot [:l {. ili It'- __l s -'-:, _. l',$t__ DRB APPLICATTON - IOTIN OF \TAU., DATE APPLICATION RECETVED : DATE OF DRB MEETTNG: revt eed 914/9L coroRAD:mrJULo6pg2 ********t* !!EIS APPLICATION TILL ITOT BE ACCEPTED I'NTIII AI.'L REQUIRED INTORMAIION IS SUBI|IITEDit**i***** r.PROJECT INFORI"IATION : A. DESCR]PTION: R TYPE OF REVIEW: Nelr Construction ($200. 00)X Minor Alteration ($20.00) Addition ($50.00)_Conceptual Review ($0) n E. ti ADDRESS:t.fa @tc- Cretk- bvivc- LEGAT DESCRIPTION: LoI Subdivision ff property is described bydescri-ption, please provide attach to this application. ZONING': Cal Block qb a meets and bounds legal on a separate sheet and LOT AREA: ff required, stamped survey showing NAME OF APPLICANT: applicant must provide a currentlot area. Mailing Address: H.NAME OF APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE: Mai 1+r-tS Address: Phd'he I.NAME OF OWNERS: *SIGNAT{IRE (S) :Mailing Address: Condominium Approval if applicable. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be paid atthe time of submittal of DRB application. tater, when applyj-ng for a building permit, please identify the J. l{ accurate valuation of the proposal. The Town of Vailwill adjust the fee according to the table below^ to . Lensure rhe correct fee is paid. ll tfll qlu EE,E PAIDz 3 ' lflr' t\.i, FEE SCHEDULE: u 1l I.Y WVALUATION FEE 1.rA$ o-s 1o,ooo s2o.oo Y) $10,001 -s 50,000 s50.00$ 50, 001 - I 150, 000 $100.00 $150, 001 - s 500, 000 $200.00 $500,001 - s1,000,000 9400.00$ over $1, 000, 000 9500 .00 * DESIGN REVIEIN BOARD APPROI'AI, EXPIRES ONE YEAR IFTER TIDTAI, APPRO/AL UNLESS A BUILDING PESMTT IS ISSUED A}ID CONSTRUCTTON IS STARTED. **NO APPLICT,TION NTLL BE PROCESSED TITBOUT OWNER'S SIGIIATT'RE \al 1I III. A pre-application meeting with a memlcer of the planningstaff is strongly encouraged to determine if any additionatapplication information is needed. It is the applicant'sresponsibility to make an appointment with the staff todetermine if there are additional submittal reguirements.Please note that a COMPLETE apptication will streamline theapproval process for your project. In addition to meeting subnittal requirements, theapplicant must stake and tape the project site toindicate property lines, building Lines and buildingcorners. AII trees to be removed must be taped. Altsite tapings and staking must be conpleted prior to the DRB site visit. The applicant must ensure that stakingdone during the winter is not buried by snow. The review process for NEW BUILDINGS normally requirestwo separate meetings of the Design Review Board: aconceptual approval and a final approval. Applicantsshould plan on presenting their development proposal ata minimum of two meetings before obtaining finalapproval . AppLicants who fail to appear before the Design ReviewBoard on their scheduled meeting date and who have not asked in advance that discussion on their item bepostponed, will have their items removed from the DRBdocket until such time as the item has beenrepublished. The following itens may, at the discretion of thezoning adrninistrator, be approved by the CommunityDevelopment Department staff (i.e. a formal hearingbefore the DRB rnay not be required): a. Windows, skylights and similar exterior changeswhich do not alter the existing plane of thebuilding,' and b. Building addition proposals not visible from anyother lot or public space. At the time such aproposal is submit.eed, applicants must include' letters from adjacent property owners and,/or fromt.he agent for or manager of any adjacent condominium association statinq the associationapproves of the addition. If a property is located in a mapped hazard area (i.e. snow avalanche, rockfall, flood plain, debris flow,wetland, etc), a hazard study rnust be submitted and the owner must sign an affidavit recognizing the hazardreport prior to the issuance of a building permit.Applicants are encouraged to check with a Town Plannerprior to DRB application to determine the relationshipof the property to all mapped hazards. For all residential- construction: a. Clearly indicate on the floor plans the insideface of the exterior structural walls of thebuilding,' andb. Indicate with a dashed line on the site plan afour foot distance from the exterior face of thebuilding walls or suppoxting columns. If DRB approves the application with conditions ormodj-fications, all conditions of approval must beresolved prior to Town issuance of a building pernit A. R L. D. E. NAME OF PROJECT: LEGAL STREET DESCRIPTION: ADDRESS: LIST OF MATERIALS Lor- BLocK EIQ suBDrvrsroN VV lrt DEscRrPrroN oF PRoJEcr: ltX4q/LF- Lrp6""al* The following J.nformation is Review Board before a final A. BUILDING MATERIALS: Roof ' Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashings Chimneys Trash Enclosures Greenhouses Other B.LANDSCAPING: required for submittal approvaL can be given:to the Design TYPE OF MATERIAL a Name of Designer: Phone; PLANT MATERIALS: PROPOSED TREES Botanical Name Conmon Nane Ouantitv Si-ze* ?r whr+a 6r,ar^r drif+CvtV+ts. fufu^ I EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED *Indicate caliper for deciduous trees. Minimum caliper for deciduous trees is 2 inches. Indicate height for coniferoustrees. Minimum heiqht for coniferous trees is 6 feet. COLOR PLANT MATERG: Botanical Name PROPOSED SHRUBS ?hr&--tz'"o..oO,"*.Ouantitv S* ze* EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED *Indicate size5 qalfon. GRQUND COVERS of proposed shrubs. Tvpe Minimum size of shrubs is Sguare Footaqe soD SEED TYPE OF TRRIGATION TYPE OR METHOD OF EROSION CONTROL C. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: If exterior lighting is proposed, please show the number of fixtures and locations on a separateIighting plan. Identify each fj-xture from the lighting plan on the list below and provide the wattage, height abovegrade and type of tight proposed. oTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURES (retaining wa]Is, fences, swi_rnmingpooIs, etc.) Please specify. Indicate heights of retainingwaIIs. Maxj-mum height of walls within the front seLback is3 feet. Maxj-mum height of waLls elsewhere on the propertyis 6 feet. D. PUBLIC NOTICE (ozvt) 2. NOTTCE tS HEREBY GTVEN that the Planning and Environmental commission of ffts Town of Vait wiil hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 18.66.060 of the Municipal Code ol the Town of Vail on Juty 27, 1992, at 2:00 p.m. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. Consideration of: l. A request lor a work session for an exterior alteration for the Vail Uonshead Center Buitding, located at Lot 5, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing/ 520 East Uonshead Gircle. Applican[ Oscar L. Tang Planner: Andy Knudtsen A request for a work session for a major amendment to SDD #4 Cascade Village to ameid the development plan for the Waterford parcel located at1275 Westhaven Drive and as legally described as: That part ot the sw 1/4 NE 1/4, Section 12, Township 5 south, fansg 81 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, describeCt as follors: Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line ol lnterstate Hphway No. 70 whence an iron pin with a plastic cap marking the center of said Section 12 bears s 33.10'19'W 1447.03 feet;thence along said southly right-of-way line two @urs6s 1) N 52'50'29' E 229.66 feet 2) N 74'38'17' E 160.70 feet; tlience departing said southerly right-of-way line N 88o45'57' E 138.93 feet; thence S 40o45'14'W 94.32 feet; thence S 18" 18'36' W 54.08 feet; thence S 01"21'36'W 205.02 feet; thence S 12"07'35'W 110.25 feet;thence S 28o28'36'W 164-48 feet; thence N 40'17'04" W 211.16 feet; thence N 49'42'56'E 97.80 f€et; thence N 37"0931' W 95.59 feet; thence S 52'50'29' W 55.10 feet; hence 69.48 feet along the arC Of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 65.00 feet, a central angle of 61"14'42 and a chord that bears N 58'55'53" W 66'22 feet;thence N 37"09'31" W 118.50leet To The True Point of Beginning, County ol Eagle, State of Colorado. Applicant: MECM Enterprises represented by Eustaquio Cortina Planner: Shelly Mello A request to amend a condition of a previously approved variance and exterior alteration, regarding the CCI parking pay-in-lieu fee for the Red Llon Building' located at 304 Bridge StreeULots E, F, G and H, Block 5A, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant Vencura,Ltd/JayPeterson Planner: Mike Mollica 3. 4. A request for a work session for a conditional use permit for an addition to the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department, located at 75 South Frontage Road West (at the east end ol the existing Municipal Building), and as legally described below: A part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 5 South, Range 80 West ol the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Section 6, thence North 00 degrees 28 minutes 16 seconds West and along the East lins of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 72.75 he East line ol saH Soulheast 1/4 of said Section 672.75 feet to a point, said point b€ing 110.00 feet northeasterly lrom the southerly rlght-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 6 as measured at right angles thereto; thenc€ North 79 degrees 46 minutes 1l seconds West and along a line parallel to said southerly right-oFway line 1rt5.50 feet to The True Point of Beginning; thence North 16 degrees 08 minutes 47 seconds East 78,00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds West 428.70 feet; thence North 66 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West 152.57 feet; thence South 27 degrees 42 minutes 40 seconds West 192.66 feet; thence South 52 degrees 48 minutes 50 seconds East 36.32 feet to a point, said point being 110.00 feet northeast from said South dght-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 6 as measured at right angles thereto; thenca South 79 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds East and along a line parallel to said South righl of way line 585.56 feet to The True Point of Beginning. Except that portion conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners of Eagle County, and the Department of Highways, State of Colorado by rule and order recorded January 5, 1971 in Book 219 atPage 441. Applicant: Town ot VailPlanner: Mike Mollica 5. A request for a conditional use permit, a site coverage variance, and a minor exterior alteration to allow for the expansion of an existing outdoor dining deck for Sweet Basil Restaurant, 193 Gore Creek Drive, part of Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Kevin ClairPlanner: Shelly Mello 6. Any items tabled from the July 13, 1992 meeting. The applications and information about the proposals are available for public review In the Gommunity Development Department office. Town of Vail Community Development Department Published in the VailTrail on July 10, 1992. '5 GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDING 193 Gore Creek Drive Vail, Colorado LIST OI'ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Block 58 Vail Village 1st Block 5-A LotC&D288 Bridge Street Block 5-BLot A 183 Gore Creek Drive Block 5-C Lot A-C Block 5-C LotB&C 281 Bridge Street Block 5-CLoI L Block 5-E LoI K 122 x,ast Meadow Drive Filing Otto Stork 2605 Davos Trail Vail, co 81657 Sitznar.k at VaiI, Inc. 183 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Lodge Propertles 174 East Gore Creek Drive VaiI, CO 81557 Vail Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Vai1, Co 8'l 658 B1anch C. Hill 311 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Fred Hibberd, Jr. P.O. Box 7474 Jackson, wY 83001 %tr vtay 29, 1992 Ms. Kristan Pritz, Director Town of Vail Community Development 75 South Frontage Road WestVail, Co 81657 Re: Proposed Sweet Basil Deck Expansion Conditional Use Permit Submittal for Council Approval to Proceed with the Process Dear Kristan: In conjunction wj.th work we are doing to update the Gore Creek Plaza Building for the owners and condominium Assoeiation, Kevin Clair would 1j.ke the Council to consider expanding the Sweet Basil Deck onto the Town property. We understand that anyproposal must comply with the guidelines for CCl , Urban Design Guide PIan, and the Streetscape Plan, The existing situation' although not bad, could be improved. Encl"osed please find a sketch of the proposal, photos of thearea, Application for Conditional Use Permit, Streetscape plans applicable, and a check for 9200.00. ff you would like to have a pre-application conference or need additional information, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, cHITECTS I P. C. Edward M. Gwathmey, AI EMG/ad Sketch Proposal Photographs ApplicaLion for Conditionaf Streetscape Plan Check - $200.00 HII,IEY/PRATT Enclosures: Use Permit i 'reviged 9/4/9L TPPLICTTIOT TOR Date of Application Date of PEC Meetinq CONDTTIOIIAL USE PERMIT 5'L1 ,1L This procedure is required for any project required to obtain aconditional use permit. The application will not be accepted until all inforrnation issubnitted. th) PHONE A. NAI'4E OF APPLICANT ADDRESS NAME OF A.|'J UJ(.t:J ) J APPLl TrSpDo SENTAT NAME OF OWNER(S) (pri or$rER (s) srcNABuRE (s) AUUI{.Ii5J HONE n LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEGAL:LOT BLOCK FILING E. F. FEE S2OO. OO PAID cK#BY THE FEE MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN]TY DEVELOPMENT WILL ACCEPT YOUR PROPOSAL. A l-ist of the names of owners of aII property adjacent tothe subject property INCLUDING PROPERTY BEHIND A].ID ACROSS STREETS, and their mailing addresses- THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECT OWNERS AND CORRECT ADDRESSES. II. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: A pre-application conference with a planning staff member isstrongLy suggested to determine if any additional information isneeded. No application wilL be accepted unLess it complete (mustinclude all- i-tems required by the zoning administrator) . It isthe applicanL' s responsibility t^o make an appointment with thestaff to find out about additional submittal reouirements. III. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMPLETE APPI,ICATION WILL STREAMLINE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR YOUR PROJECT BY DECP€ASING THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE PLANNING AND EM/IRONMENTAL coMMrssloN (pEc) MAy STIPULATE. & CONDTTTONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A BUILDING PERI',IIT IS ISSUED. Four (4) copies of the following information nust besubmitted: 1. A description of the precise nature of the proposed use and i-ts operating characleristics and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other proper+-ies in the rrininir-rrY4v4rrru_!. The description must also address: a. Relationship and impact of the use on developmentobjectives of the Town. l-\*."a of the use on light t-"it, dist.ribution ,'*of poputaLion, transportation facilities, utilitiesr schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and pubJ-ic facilities needs- I c. Effect upon tlaffic, with particular reference to congestion, auLonotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverabilityl and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. d. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses . A site plan at a scale of at least \n = 20t showing proposed development of the site, including topography, building locationsl parking, traffic circulation, useabte open sPace, landscaped areas and utilities and drainage features. Preliminary building elevations and floor plans. A title report to verify ownership and easements. If the building is condominiumized, a letter from the condominium association in support of the proposal must be submitted to staff. Any additional material necessary for the review of the appfication as determined by the zoning administrator. ** For interior modifications, an improvement survey and site plan may be waived by the zoning administrator. REQUIREMENTS The Planning and EnvironmenLal Commission meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. A complete application form and aL1 accompanying material (as described above) must be submitted a minimum of four (4) weeks prior to the date of the PEC public hearing. No incompleLe applications (as determined by the zoning adninistrator) will be accepted by the planning staff before or after the designated submittal date. 5. 6. IV. T]ME A. B. A. All PEC approved conditional use permits shall lapse if construction is not conmenced within one year of the date of approval and diligently pursued to completion, or if the use for which Lhe approvat is granted is not conmenced within one year. If this application requires a separate review by any local, State or Federal agency other than the Town of Vail, the application fee shali be increased by $200.00. Examples of such review, may j-nclude, but are not limited to: Colorado Departrnent of Highway Access Permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404, etc. The applicant shafl be responsible for paying any publishing fees which are in excess of 50* of the application fee. !f, at the applicant's requestr dnY natter is postponed for hearing, causing the matter to be re-published, thenr the enLire fee for such re-publication sha1l be paid by the applicant. R CONFERENCE Date: Place: Present: Re: I,IEMORANDU}'T 7 -7 -92 Town llall She11y Mello, Planner #1 Ned GwathmeY Sweet Basj.l Deck Expansion Exterior Modifications to Gore Creek Plaza Building The purpose of this meeting was to 99 9Yer. the staff comments on two broposals. Shelly relayed the folLowing: 1. Staff and the Streetscape Consultant Jeff Winston wanted to see more landscaplng and thiee alternatives ltere discussed' a. Pla;tei along the front edge of the deck' b. Trees in grates. c. Trees on the corners of the proposed planterl one lras proposed already, and they wanted to see evergreens. Ned will discuss this with the owners 2. The pavers not continue in a straiqht line be be rolled back towards the building. 3. Staff would like the survey to show the edge of the underground Parking below. 4. Stizmarks approval 1s necesgary if paving is proposed on their propertY. The foregoing constitutes our understandj-ng of matters discussed and decisions reached. If the interpretation of others variest don't hesitate to let us know.Ail-4W,'al I TOWI{ OFVAIL Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2 r 38 FAX 970-479-2452 www.ci.vail.co,us Slifer Smith & Frampton Real Estate c/o Rodney Slifer 230 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Re: Result of April 15, 2003 Council Appeal April 17,2003 Mr. Slifer: This letter is to inform you of the results of the Town of Vail Council appeal of the condition of approval for the elimination of Unit 3 in the Gore Creek Plaza Building. On April 15,2003 you appealed the Planning and Environmental Commission's condition of approval requiring all fire violation mitigation to occur in Unit 2, Unit 3, and the Penthouse within 12 months of the issuance of a building permit. This condition shortened the time frame established in a lefter from the Town of Vail Fire Department which gave until May 20, 2005 to complete the fire violation mitigation. At the hearing the Council heard a staff presentation and reviewed the Planning and Environmental Commission's condition of approval. After discussion a motion was made by Greg Moffett to modify the condition to read as follows: 'The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 2A,2002letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department in the identified time frame for the Penthouse, Unit 2, and Unit 3. The applicant shall perform the mitigation required to remedy the existing violations in the Penthouse, Unit 2, and Unit 3 no latter than at the request for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or May 20, 2005, as outlined in the March 20,2002,letter." The motion was seconded by Bill Jewitt and was approved by a vote of 6-0 (Rodney Slifer abstained)' The Planning and Environmental Commission's approval of the elimination of Unit 3 will now have to meet the requirements of the above condition. Please review these comments and if you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at 479-2148. With regards, fun*^ Warren Planner Cc: File {g*r o* o PLANNIN !t coMMlsslo %*r, 1:00 pm G AND ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS Monday, March 10, 2003 PRoJEcToR|ENTATIoN/.CommunityDevelopmentDept.PUBL|cwELcoME 12:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bernhardi George Lamb Gary Hartman Site Visits : 1. Slifer residence - 193 Gore Creek Drive Driver: George MEMBERS ABSENT Doug Cahill Rollie Kjesbo Public Hearinq 'Town Gouncil Ghambers 2:00 pm 1 . An request for a final review of a conditional use permit p^urs.uant to,section 12-78-5' Permitted and Condition"f U"es; n6oue SeconO Floor, Vaii Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing dwelting uniiin in" Gore Creek Plaza Building, lo-cated at 193 Gore Creek Dr' / Gore creekFlaza condominiums, Block 58, Vail Village First Filing. APPlicant: Rod and Beth Slifer Pianner: Warren CamPbell MOTION: Cary nartman SECOND:George Lamb VOTE:5-0 APPROVED WITH 1 AMENDED CONDITION: r tt/_\t1l lE/lt NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 l.Theapp|icantsha||submitap|antoa.!|lessthevio|ationsidentifiedinthe March 20, zooz rJieiiror tnu'To*n of Vait Fire Department.. The remedy for addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior.to the issuance of a building permit foithe Unit 3 consolidation and remodel. The remedy forthe fire violations withi" u"li" i, g, and the penthouse in the Gore creek Plaza Building must be "onlpt"t"J *ittiin'12 months of the building permit being issued. A request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Lj-"ii ui" ptt; " t"qu"tt to1. a final review of a recommendation to the Vait rown council ot " pioio-"li #"nordnt to the vail Village Master Plan; a reouggt f919 final review of a recommJ;i;t'di; the Vail Town Council oi a text amendment to the Vail Town Code, Title 12, zon-ing ilAii"tiont, to allow for the creation of a new zone district' Ski Base Recreation 2; and " iEqr"""t for a worksession to discuss the following applications:.,a recommendation to the Vaif -iown Council of a text amendment to Section 12-7-8-13*:YY 2. ffii;J|%Xffih:si;il"s; a request for a recomm"nd"tion to the Vail rown council of a .r--\ proposed rezoning of Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5th Filing from Public Accommodation ion'e Oi"trlct (pA) [o Parking zone district (P); a requeJt for a recommendation to the Vail Town born"iLtot tne proposed z-oning of an unptatted parcel of land commonly referred to as the 'iraOe parcet' and Lots 1 & 2, Mill Creek SuOdivision to Ski Base Recreation ll zone district; a r"qr"it to1. i rinor subdivision, pursuant to Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, VailTown Code, to illow for the relocation of thd common property line between Lots P3 & J, Block 5A' V.ail Viff"G-silfiling; ;i.qu""t for a recommenOaiion io the Vail Town Code of a prop.osed-major subdlvision, pu-rsuant'to S""tion 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to alow lor !h^e pf "tting ot ti'ri "traOe ptrtlf ; " t"qresi tor a conditional use permiq.pursuant to Chapter 16' Tiiit ri, of the Vait fown-Cboe, tb allow for a "private off-street vehicle parkin9 facility _and public p'ark" to be constructed and operated on Lots P3& J, Block 5A' Vail Village 5"'l-lllng; a tqre"t ior jn exterior itteration br modification, pursuant tg..-Secli91 12'78'7' Exterior nttiritions or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Lodge at V-ail; a rdif"""it"t a variance from Section 12-21-10, Development Restricted,,Vail Town Code' prl"uintio Cn"ptet 17, Variances, Zoning Reg-tllations, to allow for-the construction of multiple- iamily dwelling units on "lop"" in excesiof +10%; and a request for the establishment of an appr6veO devElopment plari to facilitate the construction of Vail's Front Door, and setting forth dbiails in regard ihereto. 1A more completemetes and bounds legal description is available at the Town oivail Community Development Department) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Jay Peterson Planner: George Ruther MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND:George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL - LAND USE TEXT AMENDMENT MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND: Gary Hartman VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL - VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL _ NEW ZONE DISTRICT A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed text amendment to Section 12-10-9: Loading Standards, Vail Town Gode, to amend the requirement for loading berths & setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant Town of Vail Planner: Allison Ochs MOTION:Gary Hartman SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 TABLED UNTIL APRIL 14, 2OO3 5. A request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3 (ConditionallJses), Vail Town Code, to ariow ior a privaie school, located at Parcel B, a resubdivision of Tract D, Vail das Schone 1't Filing,'generally known as the'Hud Wirth" property. (A full metes & bounds description is avlitaUte at the Department of Community Development upon request). Applicant Children's Garden of Leaming Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARCH 24, 2OO3 : I 4. t 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 36, pursuant to Section 12-94-10, Vail Town Gode, to allow for a mixed-use hotel, a request for a flnal review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12- 7A-3, Vail Town Code, to allow for Type lll Employee Housing Units and a fractional fee club; and a reguest for a recommendation to the Vail Town Gouncil for a proposed rezoning of Lot 9A, Vail Village 2no Filing from Heavy Service (HS) District to Public Accommodation (PA) District, located at 28 S. Frontage Rd. and 13 Vail Road/Lots 9A& 9C, Vail Mllage 2nd Filing. Applicant: Nicollet lsland Development Company Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARC H 24,2003 7. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special Development District No. 37, pursuant to Section 12-94-6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Tivoli Lodge, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'n Filing. Applicant: Robert & Diane LazierPlanner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL APRIL 14, 2OO3 8. Approval of February 24,2003 minutes MOTION; George Lamb SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED 9. Information Update The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Community Development Department TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: o MEMORANDUM Town Council Community Development Department April 15, 2003 An appeal of the Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission's condition ol approval for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit at the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek DriveiLot A, Block 58, Vail Village 1"t Filing. Appellant: Rodney and Elizabeth Slifer, represented by Tom Counter of Slifer DesignsPlanner: Warren Camobell il. |il. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located al 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 58, Vail Village 1"'Filing, The property is zoned Commercial Core 1. STANDING OF APPELLANT The appellant has standing to file an appeal as the property owner. BACKGROUND The appellant, Rodney and Elizabeth Slifer represented by Tom Counter of Slifer Designs, submitted an application on February 18, 2003, which proposed the elimination of Unit 3 in the Gore Creek Plaza Building in accordance with Section 12-7B-s (Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor), VailTown Code. As required by the Section 12-78-5, Vail Town Code, the elimination of a dwelling unit in the Commercial Core 1 District requires a conditional use permit to be approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission. Due lo the potential impacts of eliminaling a dwelling unit in the Commercial Core 1 District, the Planning and Environmental Commission reviews all such proposals according to the criteria found in Section 12-16- 6 (Conditional Uses; Criteria; Findings), Vail Town Code. Based upon this review, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application to eliminale a dwelling unit. As part of this proposal, the appellant is requesling to remodel and combine Unit 3 of the Gore Creek Plaza Building with the Penthouse above. The proposed combination of Unit 3 with the Penthouse above includes minor allerations to lhe interior of the building as there is an existing staircase leading from the Penthouse to the floor below. The proposed combination of Unit 3 with the Penthouse includes a new interior door to provide access belween the two units and a remodel of Unit 3. tv. On March 10, 2003, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a conditional use permit for lhe elimination of an existing dwelling unit (Unit 3) at the Gore Creek Plaza Building, after reviewing the criteria found in Section Vlll of the statf memorandum dated March 10, 2003. The Planning and Environmental Commission approved the conditional use permit with the condition that the applicant mitigate the violations listed in the Vail Fire Department's letter dated March 20,2002, within 12 months of the issuance of a building permit. The Vail Fire Department's letter stipulated an 18 month time irame to develop a plan for mitigating lhe violations by September 20, 2003. The letter also stipulated an 18 month time frame from September 20, 2003, to complete all mitigation solutions which would require the completion of all work on May 20,2005. The Planning and Environmental Commission modified the requirements of the Fire Depaftment's letter in a condition of approval lhat reads as follows: "The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 20, 2002 letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department. The remedy lor addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Unit 3 consolidation and remodel. The remedy for the fire violations within Units 2, 3, and the Penthouse in the Gore Creek Building must be completed within 12 months of the building permit being issued." In effect this condition would require all fire department violations be addressed within one year from the issuance of a building permit. This proposal received Design Review Board approval on March 19, 2003. lf the applicant had applied for a building permit on March 20, 2003, and the permit issued on April 1, 2003, all remodel work and fire mitigalion lor Units 2, 3, and the Penthouse would have to be completed by April 1, 2004, approximately 13 months ahead of lhe fire department's deadline ol May 20, 2005. lt is this condition of approval the appellant wishes to appeal. The request from the appellant is to follow the timeframes set lorth in the March 10, 2003 letter. Please refer to the attached Staff Memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated March 10,2003, and the atlached Planning and Environmental Commission minules for additional details about this request. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The appellant, Rodney and Elizabeth Slifer represenled by Tom Counter of Slifer Designs, is requesting an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission's condition of approval for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit Gore Creek Plaza Building. The appellant is requesting this appeal under the provisions of Section 12-3-3 (Appeals), Vail Town Code. lt has been determined that the Town Council cannol extend the 18 month deadlines set forth in the March 10, 2002, letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department under the Uniform Fire Code. The request from the appellant is to follow the timeframes set forth in the March 10, 2003 letter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends that the Town Council modify the Planning and Environmental Gommission's condition of approval for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 58, VailVillage 1't Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the tv. V. review and evalualion of the Town ol Vail Fire Department's letter dated March 20,2002, the comments made by the Planning and Environmental Commission at their March 10, 2003 meeting, and upon the review and evaluation of the applicable Town policies, regulations, and masler plans. Staff's recommendation is based upon lhe review of the criteria in Section Vlll of the March 10, 2003 memorandum and the evidence and teslimony presented, subject 1o the following findings: 1. That the proposed localion of the use is in accordance wilh the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Commercial Core 1 zone district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safely, or welfare or materially injurious to properlies or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Thal the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. Should the Town Council choose to modify the Planning and Environmental Commission's condition of approval for the elimination of an existing dwelling unil, the Communily Developmenl Department recommends lhe following condition of approval subject to the findings listed above: .1. The applicant shall submit a plan 1o address the violations identilied in the March 20, 2002 letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department in the identified time frame for the Penthouse, Unit 2, and Unit 3. The applicant shall perform the mitigation required to remedy the existing violations in the Penlhouse, Unit 2, and Unit 3 no later lhan May 20, 2005, as outlined in the March 20, 2002, letter. ATTACHMENTS March 10, 2003, Planning and Environmental Commission memorandum March 10, 2003, Planning and Environmental Commission meeting minutes (excerpt) March 20, 2002, Town of Vail Fire Department Letter Letter from appellant Public notification list A. B. t-,. D. E. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department March 10,2003 A request for a final review of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 12-78-5, Permitted and Condilional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-8, Vail Village l"tFiling. Applicant: Rodney and Beth Slifer, represented by Tom Counter of Slifer Designs Planner: WarrenCampbell I. SUMMARY The applicants, Rodney and Beth Slifer, represented by Tom Counter of Slifer Designs, are requesting a conditional use permit as outlined in Section 12-16-2 (Conditional Use Permit), Vail Town Code, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 'l s' Filing. The conditional use permil is requested to allow the applicants to eliminate an existing dwelling unit (unit 3) in the Gore Creek Plaza Building. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum, and the plans and documents presented, the Community Development Departmenl recommends approval of this request subject to the findings and conditions noted in Section lX of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicants are proposing to eliminate unit 3 and combine it with the existing penthouse in the Gore Greek Building (attachment A). This proposal requires a conditional use permit per Section 12-7B.-5 (Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor), Vail Town Code, which states that "Any permitted or conditional use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit, or any portion thereof, shall require a conditional use permit." The proposal utilizes an existing stairwell which leads from the penthouse on the fifth floor and unit 3 on the fourth floor. The only modification which will be made lo connecl the two units is the installation of a new doorway. This combining of the two units includes a remodel of unit 3. This proposal does not include the incorporation of any common hallways or other areas into the square footage of unit 3 (attachment B). III. BACKGROUND o This property is a portion of the original Town of Vail which was made legal by election on August 23, 1966 and court order on August 26, 1966. The property is currently zoned Commercial Core 1 (CC1 ).. On July 24, 1989, the applicant received Planning and Environmental Attachment: A Commission approval ol a height variance in order to construct an addition lo the penthouse. That approval resulted in the addition of 756 square feet of gross residential lloor area (GRFA).. On March 23, 1998, the applicant received Planning and Environmental Commission approval ol a conditional use permit to eliminate a dwelling unit (unil 2) after the applicant withdrew the request for a height and site coverage variance (attachmenl D). Unit 2 is currently used as a lower level ol the penthouse.. On April 27, 1998, the applicant returned to the Planning and Environmental Commission requesting a site coverage and height variance for that portion of the proposal withdrawn at the March 23, 1998 meeting. The application was denied.. On June 23, 1998, the applicant appealed the denial of lhe height and site coverage variance lo the Town Council. Town Council voted to uphold the action of the Planning and Environmental Commission.. Several applicalions for the penthouse have been approved over the years including a remodel in 1990 and awnings in 2000.r On March 20, 2002, the Town of Vail Fire Department sent a letler outlining several code violations which existed at the Gore Creek Building (Attachment C). The condominium association was given until September 20, 2003 1o develop a plan to address the violations which the fire department musl approve. That letter also gave the condominium association 18 months from Seplember 20, 2003 to complete the improvements required by the plan. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board for compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval/denial/approval with conditions of Conditional Use Permits. The Planning and Environmenlal Commission is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. 3. Elfect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the slreets and parking areas. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which lhe proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surroundino uses. 5. Such olher factors and crileria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact report concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance with development standards of zone district Lot area Selbacks Building Height Densily GRFA Site coverage Landscape area Parking and loading Mitigation ol development impacts Design Review Board: Action: The Design Review Board has NO review authorrty on a Conditional Use Permit, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating lhe Design Review Board proposal for: Architectural compatibility with other structures, the land and surroundings Fitting buildings into landscape Configuration of building and grading of a site which respects the topography Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation Adequate provision lor snow slorage on-sile Acceptability of building malerials and colors Acceptability of roof elements, eaves, overhangs, and other buibing forms Provision of landscape and drainage Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory slruclures Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances Localion and design of satellite dishes Provision of outdoor lighting The design of parks Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Staff: The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform to the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The statf also advises the applicant as to compliance wilh the design guidelines. Staff provides a stafl memorandum containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facilitates the review process. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS TOWN OF VAIL ZONING REGULATIONS 12-78 CommercialCore 1 (CC1) District 12-78-1: Purpose: The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permifted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preseruation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the Village. (Ord. 21(1980) $ 1) 12-78-5: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES; ABOVE SECOND FLOOR: (in part) A. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade: Lodges. M u ltipl e-famil y reside nti al dwell i ngs. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title. Anv permitted or conditional use which eliminates anv existina dwellina or accommodation unit, or anv ooriion thereof. shall reauire a conditional use permit. Such uses may include: 1 2-78-8 : COND lTlONAt USES; FACTORS APPLICABLE : ln considering, in accordance with chapter 16 of this title, an application for a conditional use permit within commercial core 1 district, the following development factors shall be applicable: A. Effects of vehicular traffic on commercial core I district. B. Reduction of vehicular traffic in commercial core 1 district. C. Reduction of nonessential off street parking. D. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles. E. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. F. Continuance of the various commercial, residential, and public uses rn commercial core 1 district so as to maintain the existing character of the area. G. Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design in commercial core 1 district so as to maintain the existing character of the area. H. Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the environment of commercialcore 1 district. (Ord. 16(197fl $ ) 12-78-20: VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DES/GN PLAN: A. Adoption: The Vail village urban design guide plan and design considerations are adopted for the purposes of maintaining and preserving the character and vitality of the Vail village (CCI) and to guide the future alteration, change and improvement in CCI district. Copies of the Vail village design guide plan and design considerations shall be on file in the department of community development. 12-16: Conditional Use Permits 12-16-1 : Purpose; Limitations: ln order to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permitted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development between conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses ln the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. 12-16-5: Planning and Environmental Commission Action: A. Possible Range Of Action: Within thirty (30) days of the application for a public hearing on a conditional use permit, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the application. A conditional use permit may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, requiring special setbacks, open spaces, fences or walls, Iandscaping or screening, and street dedication and improvement; regulation of vehicular aceess and parking, signs, illumination, and hours and methods of operation; control of potential nuisances: prescription of standards for maintenance of buildings and grounds; and prescription of development schedules. B. Variances: A conditional use permit shall not grant variances, but action on a variance may be considered concurrently with a conditional use permit application on the same site. Variances shall be granted in accordance with the procedure prescribed in chapter 17 of this title. (Ord. 16(1978) $ 4(b): Ord.8(1973) S 18.500) 12-16-8: Permit Approval and Effect: Approval of a conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion or the use for which the approval has been granted has not commenced within two (2) years from when the approvalbecomes final. (Ord. 10(1998) $ 10: Ord. a8fi991) $ 1: Ord.l6(1e78) S 4(d)) Vail Village Master Plan The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide to the staff, review boards and Town Council in analyzing proposals for development in Vail Village. The most signilicant elements ol the Masler Plan are the goals, objectives, policies and action steps. They are the working tools of the Master Plan. They establish the broad framework and vision, but also layout the specific policies and aclion steps lhat will be used to implement the Plan. The plan focuses primarily on architecture, redevelopmenl, economic health, open space, and circulation. Goal #1 : Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order 1o sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 Obiective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facililes. Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around economic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. 2.3 Obiective: Increase the number of residenlial units available for short term overnight accommodation. Goal #5: lncrease and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the transportation and circulation system throughoul the village. Vail Land Use Plan The Vail Land Use Plan is intended to serve as a basis from which future land use decisions may be made within the Town of Vail. The goals, as articulated within the Land Use Plan, are meant to be used as adopted policy guidelines in the review process for new development proposals. The Land Use Plan is not intended to be regulatory in nature, but is intended to provide a general framework 1o guide decision making. Where I the land use categories and zoning conflict, existing zoning controls development on a site. 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in exisling, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.4 Residenlial growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range of housing types. VI. SITE ANALYSIS Zoning: Commercial Core 1 Land Use Plan Designation: Village Master Plan Currenl Land Use: Residential/Commercial Development Standard Allowed/Required Existinq 1.3 1.4 Lot Area: Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Building Height: Site Coverage: Density: Parking: 5,000 sq. ft.7,553 sq. fl. None Required 14'-20' None Hequired 0.5'-10' None Required 0.5'-3' 33'-43' up to 40% 33'-43' (11%) 33' or less 60% 33' or less (17%) Greater than 43' (72/"\ 6,043 sq. ft. (80%) 6,084 sq. ft. (80.6%) No Change 6,043 sq. ft. (80%) 6,043 sq. ft. (80%) No Change 6 spaces(residential) 5 spaces(residential) No Change Prooosed No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change vil. North: South: East: West: Zoninq Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 Commercial Core 1 VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of this nature are established by the Town Code. The proposed elimination of a dwelling unit is located within the Commercial Core 1 zone dislrict. Therefore, this proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance wilh the provisions of Chapter 12-16, Vail Town Code. A. Consideration of Factors Reqardinq Conditional Use Permits: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives ol the Town. Staff believes there are minimal negative impacts created by the proposal on the development objectives of the Town. The site is currently nonconforming in regards to many of the zoning requirements and lhis request does not increase thal level of nonconformity. The proposal does not violate the goals of the Vail Village Master Plan. In order to have successful commercial areas il is necessary to obtain the critical mass of individuals spending time in the Village and Lionshead which can support the retail componenls. The Town promotes the creation of "hot beds or live beds" in all new development as this type of lodging provides the greatest opportunity to have the maximum number of individuals staying in the commercial areas. The Vail Village Master Plan identifies as an objective the need to increase the number of residential units (Objective 2.3). lt is a concern that the loss of existing dwelling units creates less of an opportunity to achieve the critical mass of guests in the commercial areas. While this proposal may not have a significant impact, there is concern that proposals of this type if multiplied in number could significantly deplete the opportunity to have the optimum number of individuals in the commercial areas. Cerlain uses are listed as conditional uses because of their unusual or special characterislics. The conditional use review process is required as a parlicular use has the potential to have a negative impact on surrounding properties. Through the review process the Planning and Environmental Commission examines a particular use in terms of operation and impacts. The Commission can then apply conditions on the operation of the use in order to mitigate the negative impacts of the use and to assure compatibility and harmonious SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Open Space Residential/Com mercial Residential/Com mercial Residential/Commercial 4. development between the conditional use and the surrounding properties. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation tacilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that this proposal will have no significant impact on the above mentioned items. The proposed elimination of a dwelling unit will not place an increased demand upon public infrastruclure and facilities. In a fetter dated March 20, 2002, the Vail Fire Department enumerated several code violation which exist within the Gore Creek Building (Attachment C). That letter establishes a timeframe for developing a plan to address the violations and a timeframe for implementing that plan. Per the letter the date by which a plan must be approved by the Vail Fire Department is September 20, 2003. Staff is requesting that if this proposal is approved that a condition requiring an approved plan for addressing lhe concerns lo be in place prior to issuing a building permit. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotlve and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Slaff believes that this proposal will have no negative impact on the above mentioned items. Per Section 12-10-10 (Parking Requirement Schedules), Vail Town Code, the required parking forthe site is',|.4 parking spaces per residential unit. There are currently lour units which would require six spaces. There are currently five parking spaces. This proposal would reduced the required parking by 1.4 parking spaces and therefore only require five parking spaces for the three remaining residential units. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 6'n Edition the average number of trips generated per day are 5.86 for a residential condo. Effect upon the character ol the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The incorporation and remodel of unit 3 into the penthouse will have no exterior impact. The applicants are proposing to make a small addilion of '105 square feet to an existing desk on the fifth floor of the building with this proposal. This expansion does not require review by the Planning and Environmental Commission. An application for the exterior deck was reviewed by the Design Review Board on March 5, 2003 and was tabled. 5. Affects of vehicular trafflc on Gommercial Core 1 District. The elimination of one dwelling unit could potentially reduce the numbers of vehicle trips into the parking struclure below the Gore Creek Buibing. Therefore, the affects of the request upon vehicular traffic are positive. 6. Reduction of vehicular traffic in Gommercial Core 1 District. Similar, to the previous described criteria, staff believes the elimination of one dwelling unit could have a positive impact upon the reduction ol vehicular traffic. 7. Reduction of nonessentlal ofl street parking. Staff believes the proposed elimination of one dwelling unit will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. 8. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles. Staff believes lhe proposed reguest will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on the above described criteria. 9. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. Siaff believes the proposed request will have no negalive impacts on the above described criteria. 10. Continuance of the various commercial, residential, and public uses in Commercial Core 1 District so as to maintain the existing character of the area. There is a need to have a certain ration of dwelling units per commercial square footage in order to have a viable economic village. However, staff believes the proposed request will have minimal negative impacts on the above described criteria. 11. Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design in Commercial Core 1 District so as to maintain the existing character of the area. Staff believes the proposed requesl will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. All exterior changes will be reviewed by the Design Review Board and will be reguired to adhere to the Vail Village Master Plan and other applicable documents. 12. Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other tactors on the environment of Commercial Core 1 District. (Ord. 16(1975) S a) Staff believes the proposed request will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. 10 B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followinq findinqs before qrantino a conditional use oermit: 1. That the proposed localion of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Commercial Core 1 zone district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operaled or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wellare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Thal the proposed use will comply with each ol the applicable provisions ol the conditional use permit section of lhe zoning code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of a conditional use permit, to allow for the elimination of a dwelling unil, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Commercial Core 1 zone districl. 2. Thal the proposed location of the use and lhe conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimentalto the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the following condilions: 1. The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 20,2002letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department. The remedy lor addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit for the unit 3 consolidalion and remodel. 1'l NING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS Monday, March 10, 2003 PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Gommunity Development Dept. PUBLIC WELCOME I PLAN MEMBERS PRESENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bernhardt George Lamb Gary Hartman 12:00 pm Site Visits : 1 . Slifer residence - 193 Gore Creek Drive Driver: George 1:00 pm K4 NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Public Hearinq - Town Council Chambers 2:00 pm 1 . An request for a final review of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-78-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr. / Gore Creek Plaza Condominiums, Block 58, VailVillage First Filing. Applicant Rod and Beth SliferPlannen Warren Campbell MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND:George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED WITH 1 AMENDED CONDITION: 1. The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 20, 2002 letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department. The remedy for addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permitforthe Unit3 consolidation and remodel. Theremedyforthefire violations within Units 2, 3, and the Penthouse in the Gore Creek Plaza Building musl be completed within 12 months of the building permit being issued. 2. A request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to the Vail Town Code, Title 12, Zoning Regulations, to allow for the creation of a new zone district, Ski Base Recreation 2; and a request for a worksession to discuss the following applications: a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to Section 12-78-13, Density Control, Zoning Regulations; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a MEMBERS ABSENT Doug Cahill Rollie Kjesbo Attachment: B Vail Fire & Emergency Semices 42 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2250 March 20,2002 Gore Creek Plaza Condominium Association C/o Slifer Management 143 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Gore Creek Plaza Dear Gore Creek Plaza Condominium Association; It has come to our attention through various building permit applications and physical inspections, the Gore Creek Plsza building, 193 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Eagle Coungt, Colorado, 81657, has numeroas code violations in need of abatement, The code issues have been evaluated and been found to be in violation of current code and are not subject to any 'furandfather" provision. Many of the issues identified are long standing violations. The current use(s) within the building, the frequenqt of use, proximity to adjacent buildings, building height, and condition ofthe building and associated huildingfeatures, in the aggregate, presents a Iift safety risk to the occupants. Specific issues include but are not limited to: 1. The building has been determined n he of ordinary combustible construction. Building heightfor ordinary construction is limited to three stoies. The Gore Creek Plaza Building hasfour stories. The only provision in current and past building and fire codes to allow four stories of combastible construction is to have a code compliant fire sprinkler system insnlled- 2. Exiting capacity from upper floors is limited to a spiral staircase. The occupant load is significantly limited where spiral staircases are used as a means of egress. The existing egress patternfrom the north side of the building is in need of evaluation, -3. The existing interior staircase has a combustible fuel load in excess of maximumJlame spread and smoke contribution as prescrihed under cutent codes. Interior stairways are limited to matefials with a Class A flame spread. Attachment: C ' Gore Creek Plaza Building Page 2 4. There is a non-fire rated utility shaft that appears to run from the basement through the upperfloors. This shaft has plywood doors, is open to interior combustible woodframing, and contains telephone and some electrical wiring. This shafi should be ftre rated to prevent flame spread from Jloor to floor and to the inturtor walls. .5. There is a slip joint cast pipe in the southwest corner of thefloor of the boiler room, The top two inches of the pipe are uposed to atmosphere. The eoncern is the pipe does not have sufJicient cover to prevent possible slippage or prevent freezing. The water entry station is in need of backJlow prevention to comply with state water quality control regulations. 6. The elevator should have recall capacity in accordance with ANSI standards. It is unclear the cuwent elevator control circuits have such capahility. We have seen a signiticant trend towards improving Vail's ability to provide world class service and emenities. We would entertain a reasonable plan to address the identified issues. Under the Town of Vail Municipal Code, title 10, Seuions I0-I-1 through 10-1-4, the appendix of the Uniftrm Fire Code and Uniform Building Code contain provisions to address uisting huildings. The code allows an |&-month period from date of notification to provide plans and an l&-month period thereafter to complete abatement procedures. The most successful projects have been those in which the hailding owner(s) or association(s) mgaged the assistance ofa design professional (or team) such as a licensed architect and/or afre protectian engineer. The design team can lend assistance towards identification of alternate materials and methods, scope and sequence, value engineering, design parameters, and related elements. Please consider this letter to be the initial notification- If you wish to dhcuss this matter in more detail, please contact this office and we can arrange a suitable time and location. Sincerely, Michael McGee Deputy Chief / Fire Marchal cc: John Gulick, Fire Chief LL Mike Vaughan, Fire Prevention Officer Charlie Dauis, B uilding Department a March 20,2003 Departnent of Community Developmeirt 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are requesting an appeal of the condition attached to the approval we received from the Planning and Environmental Commission" which states we must remedy the fire violations within Units 2, 3 and the Pe,nthouse in the Gore Creek Plaza Building within 12 months of the issuance of a building permit. We intend to comply but cannot possibly do so in the l2-monthperiod. The Board of the Condominium Association has met with Mike McGee and is hopefully moving toward agreement as to what needs to be done and when. That process is not complete and we are trylng to schedule a meeting next week. Enclosed is a copy of Mike's letter. In order for us to sprinkle the penthouse, we must physically move out and rent some place to live. We must also hire a crane to remove the furniture during the installation of the sprinkling system, as the furniture won't fit in the elevator or in the staircase. We cannot do this in the fall because we axe too busy with work, school, etc. The only time we could begin the process is in the spring, the end of May after school is out into June and July. I don't know how long it wiil take, but I would guess 45 to 60 days at best, which would put us into late summer before the sprinkling is complete, well past the 12- month condition imposed by the PEC. We request the time be extended to allow us to reasonably be displaced and complete the task. We would prefer an extension to the summer of 2005, which would give us breathing room in case we couldnot comply in 2004. I would also add, this will be a very expensive condition to implement. I Eust the fire deparbnent is teating all property owners in Commercial Core I in the same vigorous manner. If we are being singled out as the only building in such a tight timeframe, we stenuously object to suoh treatuent and would ask to be included in a schedule similax to that of other property owners in CCI. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, .1 .4- r-\ /.rr't, t7_6,44.+AK Rodney E.'and Elizabeth Slifer Attachment D THIS ITEM MAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERW PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearingin accordance with Secti.on 12-3-3 oJ the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on Tuesday, Aprii15' 2003, at 7:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. ln consideration of: ITEM/TOPIC: An appeal of the Town of.Vail Planning & Environmental Commission's condition of approval ofa.conditional qsg permit, in accordance with Section 12-7P.-58 (Permitted and Conditiohal Uses;Above Secon^d Floor), Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing Oweifing unit, -' located at 193 Gore Creek Drive /Block 58, Vail Village 1"t Filing. Appellant: Elizabeth & Rodney SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planne/s office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. please call 47g-2114voice or 479-2356 TDD for information. M Attachment: E n5k l ^hfi.H.* .-,Voit Vitt"gfi;r, 2i0 Bridgc Sttttt Veil C olorsdo 81657 Bob Fritch Sitzmark Hotel 123 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Tom Carpenter Village Center Condominium Ass'n 124 Willow Bridge Road Vail, CO 81657 Steve McDonald Bell Tower Condominium Ass'n 143 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Charlie Viola Lodge at Vail 174 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Va)l Villcgc Offict 2j0 Eridgc $ttect Vail Colorado 81657 Al*r\ rux m Yail Yillagc Qffice 230 Bridgc Stnct Yail Colorado 8r657 r.r. I rr..E. vlt r.. 230 Btidgc Str.ct Vail Coloudo 81657 ffi TOI4INMId=II}T/ o Appeals Form Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557 tel: 970.479.2139 faxt 970.479.2452 web : www.ci,vailtco.us General Informationt This form is required for filing an appeal of a Staff, Design Review Board, or Planning and Environmental Commission action/decision. A complete form and associated requirements must be submitted to the Community Development Depaftment within ten (10) business days of the disputed action/decision. IYa7 lt a*ltta rssacs, Date of Action/Decision:ot*-l^ tO Board or Staff person rendering action/decision: Does this appeal involve a specific parcel of tandZdG) (no) Ifyes, are you an adjacent property owner? (V"") @ Name of Appefrant(s): t?r l 1 ' tCelh Sl;*e,< MailingAddress: A3O',6ar'J?e Sa l/..'./, C t'S? Phone: ?za 4>A- a//a/ Physical Address in Vail: Legal DescripUon of Appella in Vail: Appellant(s) Signature(s): (Attach a list of signatures if space is required), Submittal Requirements: 1. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, provide a detailed explanation of how you are an "aggrieved or adversely affected person". 2. On a separate sheet or separate sheets of paper, speciff the precise nature of the appeal. Please cite specific code sections having relevance to the action being appealed. 3. Provide a list of names and addresses (both mailing and physical addresses in Vail) of all ourners of property who are the subject of the appeal and all adjacent property owners (including owners whose properties are separated from the subject property by a right-of-way, stream, or other intervening barrier). 4, Provide stamped, addressed envelopes for each property owner listed in (3'). PLEASE SUBMIT IHIS FORM AND ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS TO: TOWN OF VAIL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTI R E C ET WB FRoNTAGE RoAD, VAIL, coLoMDo 816s7. /-f Action/Decision being appeated: /Fn4on., / 4re'8.,l1,1, ou"/ l'l"e 4e-;y'." f '4pne<\tz,a /l,e Atdi*i n/la.f,o/ ro f/e A'ppp.'n / l:rz<-Deonolneof tmf ,.,'A'. lop .s /z y^',.rL/t /Ac Ft"ttAnase u'ilA 'nt ta , ao/As' March 20, 2003 Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are requesting an appeal of the condition attached to the approval we received from the Planning and Environmental Commission, which states we must remedy the fire violations within Units 2,3 and the Penthouse in the Gore Creek Plaza Building within 12 months of the issuance of a building perrnit. We intend to comply but carmot possibly do so in the l2-month period. The Board of the Condominium Association has met with Mike McGee and is hopefully moving toward agreement as to what needs to be done and when. That process is not complete and we are trying to schedule a meeting next week. Enclosed is a copy of Mike's letter. In order for us to sprinkle the penthouse, we must physically move out and rent some place to live. We must also hire a crane to remove the fumiture during the installation of the sprinkling system, as the fumiture won't fit in the elevator or in the staircase. We carurot do this in the fall because we axe too busy with work, school, etc. The only time we could begin the process is in the spring, the end of May after school is out into June and July. I don't know how long it will take, but I would guess 45 to 60 days at best, which would put us into late summer before the sprinkling is complete, well past the 12- month condition imposed by the PEC. We request the time be extended to allow us to reasonably be displaced and complete the task. We would prefer an extension to the summer of 2005, which would give us breathing room in case we could not comply in 2004. I would also add, this will be a very expensive condition to implement. I trust the fire department is treating all property owneni in Commercial Core I in the same vigorous manner. If we are being singled out as the only building in such a tight timeframe, we strenuously object to such treatrnent and would ask to be included in a schedule similar to that of other property owners in CCI. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Attachment D *T ."' Vail Yillage Office 23O Btidge Street Vzil Colorado 816t7 Bob Fritch Sitzmark Hotel 123 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Tom Carpenter Village Center Condominium Ass'n 124 Willow Bridge Road Vail, CO 81657 Steve McDonald Bell Tower Condominium Ass'n 143 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Charlie Viola Lodge at Vail 174 Gore Creek Drive Vail. CO 81657 Vail Vitlage Qffice 2j0 Bridge Strcct VaiI Colotedo 81657 Atdrv!funrn Vail Villagc Officc 2J0 Bridgc S*cct Vail Colorado 81657 23O Bridgc S*cct Veil Colorudo 81 657 THIS ITET iIAY EFFECT YOUR PROPERTY PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Council of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-3 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail on Tuesday, April 15, 2003, at 7:00 PM in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration ot ITEITI/TOPIC: An appeal of the Town of Vail Planning & Environmental Commission's condition of approval of a conditional use permit, in accordance with Section 12-TB-SB (Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor), Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive /Block 58, Vail Village 1il Filing. Appellant: Elizabeth & Rodney SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Sign fanguage interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479-2114 voic,e or 479-2356 TDD for information. NING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC MEETING RESULTS Monday, March 10,2003 PROJECT ORIENTATION / - Communityr Development Dept pUBLtC WELCOME o COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT John Schofield Erickson Shirley Chas Bemhardt George Lamb Gary Hartman o LAN (I 12:00 pm MEMBERS ABSENT Doug Cahill Rollie Kjesbo Site Visits : 1 . Slifer residence - 193 Gore Creek Drive Driver: George 1:00 pm 7,^..ff l-t tr5l Ll .lt\=4tIl NOTE: lf the PEC hearing extends until 6:00 p.m., the board may break for dinner from 6:00 - 6:30 Public Hearinq - Town Gouncil Chambers 2:00 pm 1 . An request for a final review of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 12-78-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allowforthe elimination of an existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr. / Gore Creek Plaza Condominiums, Block 58, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant Rod and Beth SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell MOTION: Gary Hartman SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 APPROVEDWITH 1 AMENDED CONDITION: 1. The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 20, 2002 letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department. The remedy for addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permitforthe Unit 3 consolidation and remodel. The remedyforthefire violations within Units 2, 3, and the Penthouse in the Gore Creek Plaza Building must be completed within 12 months of the building permit being issued. 2. A request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to the Vail Town Code, Title 12, Zoning Regulations, to allow for the creation of a new zone district, Ski Base Recreation 2; and a request for a worksession to discuss the following applications: a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to Section 12-78-13, Density Control, Zoning Regulations; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a \I proposed rezoning of Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5h Filing from PublicAccommodation zone district (PA) to Parking zone district (P); a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the proposed zoning of an unplatted parcel of land commonly refened to as the lrade parcel" and Lots 1 & 2, Mill Creek Subdivision to Ski Base Recreation ll zone district; a request for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Title 1 3, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code, to allow for the relocation of the common property line between Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5h Filing; a request for a recommenOaiion io the Vail Town Code of a proposed major subdivision, pursuant to Section 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the plafting of the "trade parcel"; a request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter!6, Title 12, of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a "private off-street vehicle parking facilig and public park" to be constructed and operated on Lots P3& J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5'Filing; a request for an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-78-7, Exterior Alterations or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Lodge at Vail; a request for a variance from Section 12-21-10, Development Restricted, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 1 7, Variances, Zoning Regulations, to allow for the construction of multiple- famify dwelling units on slopes in excess o'f 41o/o; and a request for the establishment of an approved development plan to facilitate the construction of Vail's Front Door, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (A more complete metes and bounds legal description is available at the Town of Vail Community Development Department) Applicant: Vail Resorts, represented by Jay PetersonPlanner: George Ruther MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND:George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL - LAND USE TEXT AMENDMENT MOTION: Erickson Shirley SECOND:Gary Hartman VOTE: 5-0 RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL - VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT MOTION:Chas Bemhardt RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO TOWN COUNCIL - NEW ZONE DISTRICT A request for a final recommendation of a major amendment to Special Development District No. 6, pursuant to Section 12-94-10, Amendment Procedures, Vail Town Code, to allow for a change to the existing conditions of approval (Ordinance No. 21, Series of 2000), located at 100 East Meadow Drive/Lots M, N, & O, Block 5-D, VailVillage First Filing. Applicant Waldir Prado, Daymer CorporationPlanner: George Ruther MOTION: Chas Bernhardt SECOND:GeorgeLamb VOTE:5-0 TABLED UNTTL MARCH 24, 2003 A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed text amendmenl to Section 12-10-9: Loading Standards, Vail Town Code, to amend the requirement for loading berths & setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: Town of VailPlanner: Allison Ochs MOTION:Gary Hartman TABLED UNTIL APRIL 14. 2OO3 SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 J. 4. SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 5-0 5. A request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-6D-3 (Conditional Uses), Vail Town Code, to allow for a private school, located at Parcel B, a resubdivision of Tract D, Vail das Schone 1"'Filing, generally known as the "Hud Wirth" property. (A full metes & bounds description is available at the Department of Community Development upon request). Applicant: Children's Garden of LearningPlanner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARCH 24,2003 6. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 36, pursuant to Section 12-94-10, Vail Town Code, to allow for a mixed-use hotel; a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Sestion 12- 7A-3, Vail Town Code, to allow for Type lll Employee Housing Units and a fractional fee club' and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed rezoning of Loi 9A, Vail Village 2nd Filing from Heavy Service (HS) District to Public Accommodation (PA) District, located at 28 S. Frontage Rd. and 13 Vail Road/Lots 9A& 9C, VailVillage 2nd Filing. Applicant Nicollet lsland Development Company Inc.Planner: Allison Ochs TABLED UNTIL MARCH 24, 2OO3 7. A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special Development District No. 37, pursuantto Section 12-9A-6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Tivoli Lodge, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot E Block 2, VailVilag- sdFirinl. Applicant: Robert & Diane LazierPlanner: George Ruther TABLED UNTIL APRIL 14, 2OO3 8. Approval of February 24,2003 minules MOTION:George Lamb SECOND: Chas Bernhardt VOTE: 5-0 APPROVED 9. lnformation Update The applications and information about the proposals are available for public inspection during regular office hours in the project planner's office located at the Town of Vail Community Development Department, 75 South Frontage Road. Please call 479-2138 for information. Sign language interpretation available upon request with 24 hour notification. Please call 479- 2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for information. Community Development Department 08:30am Fronr-T0titli 0F v$[|4ulllTY DEVELOPE|iT 070479t452 T'370 P.00t/002 F-763 VaiI Fire & Emergency Services 42 llest Meadow Drive Yail, Colorado 81657 97M79-2250 Morch 20,2002 Gorc Creek Plsu Condoninium Association Uo Slifer Monagenent 743 East Meabw Drive YaiI, Colorado 81657 Re: Gore Creek Plsza Dear Gore Creek Plaza Condominium Association; ft has come to our ettentlonthrough various buildtng pennlt applications and plrysicct inspections,the Gore Creck Plaza building, 193 Gorc Creek Drive, Vail, Eagle County, Colorudo, 81657, has nameroas ude iolations in need of abatament The codc issues hmte been evaluated and beenfoundto be inviolAion of canent codc and are not subied to any ogrzndfather" provision. Many of the issues identifted are long standing vblattons, The cunefi use(s) within the bailding, thefreqaengr of use, pruimity to adjocent buildings, building height, and conditlon of the buikling and associated. building feaures, in the aggregqte, presents a life safety risk to the occuponts. SpectJic issues tnclude but are not limited to: 1. The buildlng hus been determined w bc of ordinary combustiblc constructiorL Building height for ordinary constntction is limited to three stories. The Gore Creek Plaza Building has four stories- The only provision in current and past building andfire eodes to allowfour stories of comhustible construction is to have a code compliantftre sprinkler system installed 2. Exiting capacilyfrom upperfloors is limited to a spiral stuircase. The occupant load ls signiJicantly Iimiled where spiral staircases ure used as a means of egress The uisting egress panerhfron the north side of rte build@ is in need of evoluation 3. The isting interior stalrcase has a combustihle fuet load fu acess of muimum flame spreed and smoke contribufion as prescribed und,er current codes. Interior stahuays qre limited to natedals wlth a Class A Jlame spread. ;la:4tl-OS 08:30am Fron-T0tlil 0F \lAIL C0tl4ulilIY DEVELOPTEi{T 9104t92452 Gorc Creck Pltza Building Page 2 T-370 P.002/002 F-763 There is a non-frrc rdcd atiEty shafr, that appean to run from the basement through the wpperfloors. This shaft has plruood doors, is open to interior combustiblawoodframing, and contains tclephone and some electrical wiring. This shofi should be fire ruted to pra'er.tflume spreod from Jloor to floor and o the Inurlorwalls There is a slipioint cast pipe in the southwest corner of theJloor of the boiler roorn The top two Inches of the pipe are uposedto atmosphere. The concern is the pipe does not have sufJicient cover to preyent possible slippage or Preventfreezing. Thewater entry stotion Ls ln neetl of backJlow prarention to comply with state water guuliqt control regulations. The elwator shoald han recall capucity in accordance wfih ANSI srundards. It is unclear rhe cunent elevator contol circaits hsrte sach capabilig- Wc have seen a significant tend rcwsrds improving Vail's ability to prwide world class service and amenities. We would entertain a reesonable plcn to sddress the identiJied issues, Andet the Town of Voil Municipal Code, fitle 10, Sections 10-1-7 through 10-14, the eppendix of the Uniform Fhe Code and Untforn Building Code contain provisiotts to eddress uisting buildings. The code alto*s an l$-month periodfrom date of notiftcation to provide plans and an |&-month pefiod thereafier to complete abatemeht procedures. The most successful proieds have been rhose in which the buikling owner(s) or association(s) engoged thc assistsnce ofe design profcssional (or team) sach as o licensed architect and/or efire protection engineer. The design teum can lend assistance towards identiJication of altemate materials and methods, scope and sequence, value engineering, deslgn paraneten, and related element* Please consider this lettel to be the initiol notiJieuion" If you wish to dfuscussthis m6ter in more detail please contact this oflice and we can anange o svitabk time and, locatlon. Sincerely, Michael McGee Depaty Chief / Fire Marshal cc: John Galick, Fire ChieJ Lt. Mike Vaughan, Fire Prsvention Oficer Charlie Davis, Building Dqtanment r I . rJ I rtl nezaFo nssoc l ates s'/o9+94939 P.2 E.ru^ % S-r-(( ^+ Coun"il Nee+,y o1 Michael Hazwd d ,r,JY,rcratd$ Arc:lritc<:tutc. pt ,r n!! l teri.rt r ah,, Pes't'n1 ou'"'ceJ An?,r'nL^i B"Qren' Aun^l Aeet;"3 P.O. Box t06d l"ail, ('.'olorudl 8/6J.9 970.949.1958 970.t)le1til8.fiir ntha(ijltail,nel upHIINc No'rEs ,).{'it:/t t\.tL.l: r.(xtA't'toN: ,.\.IIENDF:IiS: Apjil lt,2003;9:00 A.M 9t* of Stifer Sroi$ iornpt* ReaI Estate, VailRod Slifcr; Owner/Board t tcrnUer, fi;#;i; !$c\!.o1enoui$owner{9ar-{i4;-b;;;;.ffi n",rr" l{ikgr4csee; Deputy chier& Fi,. M;ili;;ri" "i u",ffuti; ngis; Chief Buitding omcia-ioil ;;v;i.steve stafford; &opertv y*** i,tr; r*dlr. companyEd louney; Maindra; ry*"".qf$qffierrr*, companyMichael A. Hazard AIA: pnncipal, Michael Hazad AssocratesGore Cresk plaza Suildirro _Brdfdhg and Fire Code IsiuesVail, Colorado Attendses File RE.; DI.S'i.RIJJLITION: ffi ,tHffitff $'Jf'J,'T- r . oe tetr- i,,uad,p_ yt fr"*" * rea,,*- rccommendarion, *n *,*r],lll1l1},g^*-9:t: ctnk Pl;*'' ;d;'=; 6iffi"i*,rccommendarions and fi'ther. i..u* aT***ii'il;&;H#Iffi ,:i1iilffitk,_rntent to develop a pran for the impl;*t;;n;l ffi;", an associated schedule foroocumentation and instatation, fs many r""ror, *iiiirrot schedule it is ack'owledged thatadJustnents ma.y b€ neededi::.yqa;d G;;;; accommodare tenatrE, requirementsa*d or'er factors rhat may aris€. rhe r own wiiG ,ppoi*a ir -a when they do occ'rA Slifer Residential Resrodel (Unit 3): Mike McGee indicated 6at with F: o* ofwork towards the improvements and upgrades tottrc entire building the Slifos could proceed *i,iG'rl_"aa of their unit B. Fire protection and Suppression Syste@: Mike McGee made the foll<systcrn: )wng comments regarding tjle fire protection and suppressio. l. tthe installation .t-?rr*rf *stcrn is the most cost_effective mothod of^ effectively addrcssrng code issues.z. A system should bedesigned according to NFPA Standard 13.3' The existing *u*,.Tlfu ur." rr*"'try t*t a but recommended that it be. yerified to assess its capacity.4' It wourd probabry ue ai*q*t. to service *re upper levcls rcsidentiar occupanciesard possibly thc Sweet Basil kitd; ;; *""ooO noi* commercial occupancies.5' The swecr Basil resraurant will ililt;.qrrt" additionar capacity due to ie size. . Rpr 15 03 -1 l2: OOp MEETINGNOTES i ch o ael Hazand Flssoc i ates S?OS.+9443S p.3 April 11, 2003 Page2 6. The garage fire pfoteotion could most likd be sewed with the installation of an anti-fteeze loop (approximato oosfi $500). 7. The fire prot"ction iiping running through the garago area will need_to be run in an insulate( norizonbl ihase md may necd to be fiuther tcrnpoed with heat tape to proteoted it from froczing. l.llis witl be especially importar{ in spiG of Rod slifer,s asse*ion &at rhJgarage often rernains above fi'eezing dudry the winter, as this tine will not hold moving water like the other domestic service water lmes' Ed Lowrey was asked by chuck Roscnquist to soticit proposals fiom fire protection engiteers. The services of this cou$iltart vdll be retained directly by The Board. Firi protection scope of servic€s likely to inctude the following. Other services rnay be roquired by The Town of Vail: 1, Review of the eisting installation with an acoompanying report to thc owners assessing compliance to firc proteotiOn and suppressiOn codes and standards including Standard NFPA 13. 2. preparadon of all fue protection and suppression documenadon (drawings and specifications) for any remedial work reported during tho existing conditions assessment and all new WOrk to comply to fire protootion and suppression code and standrds inoluding Shdsrd NFPA 13. 3. Any revisions or additional docume,lrtatiOn request€d as a result of the Fire . Deprhnent's review of the design doarnents submitted for pqmit'' 4. Assistrucc to gencral contraotor with subconbactor bid rwiew for adherence to the engineer's design documentation and specifications. 5. Corrstruction adminisEation, The fire protection engineer will retdew 8trd rstum all fire protection and suppression shop drawiugs and my associated calculations with the ingineer's action stamp and any comme,nts, clarification or corrections. The timing and number of site observation visits must bc at dre discretion ofthe eirgioeer and coordinated with the geueral cortactor and Owncr. Eachvisit must be accompanied with field reports dif€oted to The Board and the general conhactor. C. Vertical Chase (Shaft): Charlie Moore indicated lhat there are sev€ral altenrative responses to reconstruct the chase according to code. Charlie recommended that the shaft should bc protected by the sprinkler systun and be constructed to obtain a one-houl rating. A prc-designed, one-hour nted shall- wall con$Euction system will tikely be employed without horizontal sepaations. Ed Lowrey indicated that ther6 is need for servica access to hs shaft at all three levels; thdrefore tbere will most likely bo ono-hour ratod ac,coss panels at all levels, Some degree of relocation of utilities, in the chase, will likcly be required. D. Unprotected Ope,ning5: Charlie Moore indicated drat dre lurcrn*ional Building Code (not yet adopted) allows for up to 35% oftotal glazing be unprotected. Mike McGee recommended that the fire protection enginoer be retaitrod to design an appropriate altemative to the UBC "window wash" approach. ' Hpr 15 03 \ 12: OOp MEETINGNO'TES t'tlhael Hazard Hssociares qts+saa3s P-'r April 1t,2003 Pago3 E. Perorarions of Requircd Firarared FloorAilalVCeiling fusemblies: At separations (orterior and interior walls, floors and ceilings) requiring one or two hourra*d 'onstruction assembties, .tt.rilt"d;;;;;; will need to be exposedand either eliminated or correcrod wiut th";;di;;-oir"t a p*"t ation dwices (fire_rateddarnpers, firo'ratcd inturncsc€nt se4ra_rt, Etc.). Require4 rated doorways that neod to remainopen during normar business use wil be fitted withiou,n oe vail *a-iigc;iov"dmagnctic hold-open dwices, F. Secondary Egress Rod Slifer requ$ted rhar g seoonday ogrcss solution be designed to meet building codeapproval and possibrv integrate the sorriion d",i; d Th;-\Atil;il#tlp. MicbaerlToc wul-reguest a copy to t""rro* it -ighiir ii!i"-*tra. Rod and chuck will seek anagrccrnent for imprementation with rhe Be[ Tower f,o***,",, associatioa G. Water Service Enky: Mike McGee and clurlie Davis agreod that thc wa&r servicc etruy, at the basement, can becompleted in coordination with thi anticipatJsueeiworr. at Gore cre€k Drive lI. Miscellanoouslssuq }:Sl"ygluilding code compriance items werc nored by Michael Hazard during therreetmg, as some of the issues previously ideotified by Chariie Davis: - ' Thc unprotected steel bean\ at t'e basernent, shall be properry gnclosed.' T" existing sump pi! at the mech"r,icJ room, will be verified to on$re thatthere is an adcquate oover to prcvant the scepage of sewcr gasses. - ' ' The doors separating the Mechanical Roo-'foil tL" c.t"iJrr uo vcrified tocomply with code requirements for a one t,o*_rt.J*r"riiy. "' "- I. Other Business chuck Rosenquist anticipated trat dre renovation of the ve*ical chase would likely be thefirst scopo to be completod. Tha Boar4 g;".r1 ;;;tor, Fire and Building Deparruents$]l:rt* this assurnprion na tecommiJth;;t"p*;.q"ance of implementatio'of ail thetmprovements. Michael Hazard Associates was asked by Rod and chuok to provide a foc proposar forscrvices including the documentatign o.r_listin! coiJr{or" and a schemaric design for l:,1**.:::lrlT:'i'^rl:o id;dnd;;;;. il dre desired sequence of work is gs tleeti;rs Not€s repoq recorded by Michaer Hazard Associates, represents the writq,s ::T:fj:lq:ldrc content discussed during u,e ,rilen..a *eeting. Attendees arecompelled to roview and respond to Michael-Hazar; G;;;ff; #:;ff,clarifications or additional comm€nts within {g trou.s to eusure a comprete and accuraterecord' No portions of liis tccord strouro ue miscoosruid as recomnrendations, authonty oropinions by Michael Hazard Associater, it- "-pr.y"", "r agen*, 'nless otherwise stated. Page I of I Warren Campbell - Re: Fwd: Letter regarding fire code and the inability of the Council to change the statements in you letter. From: Matt Mire To: Mcgee, Mike Date: 03/2612003 2:43 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Letter regarding fue code and the inability of the Council to change the statements in you letter. You are absolutely correct. I will advise the counsel that they may review the decision ofthe PEC which shortened the time to 12 months, but they cannot otherwise alter the order or extend the deadline beyond the 18 month time frame set by your deparhnent. -matt J. Mafthew Mire Town Attomey Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Ph.970.479.2107 Fx.970.479.215'7 luque@si.ya"ll.,c-a.u.$ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information belonging to the sender which may be confidential and legally privileged. Ifyou are not the intended recipient ofthis e-mail, you are hereby notified that any disseminatioq distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is saictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this e-mail in crror, please notiSr me immediately by telephone or e-mail and destroy the original message without making a copy. Thank you. >>> Mike Mcgee 03/26103 I l:06AM >>> Matt, I issued a letter to Gore Creek Plaza Association (attached). Ron Slifer has a proposal to do some more work in the condos. My original letter gave them l8 months to submit plans and 18 months thereafter to complete the work. The PEC heard Slifet's proposal and put a condit'ion on it that reduces the time for compliance to 12 months. Slifer wants to appeal the PEC decision to Council. Staff(Com Dev) recommendation was to stay with the 18i 18 time line. Council can amend or overtum the PEC condition but it is my opinion the 18 month requirement issued under the UFC is not subject to appeal. It is the code the Town adopted and appeals are limited to interpretation, application, methods and materials. The Fire Departrnent's order should be under the jurisdiction of the Court unless Council amends the code. Am I correct? Should Council be given some guidance when this appeal reaches their desks? fi le://C :\Windows\temp\GW ] 000 I 3.HTM 04t04/2003 l Proiect Namer Slifer Residence CUP Pmject DescripUon: Participants: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL CO Rslifer@slifer.net 81657 License: Project Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL 230 Bridge Street, Penthouse Legal Description: Lot: Block 58 Subdivision: Vail Village Filing 1 Parcel Number: 210108213002 Gomments: SeeConditions Planning and Environmental Commission ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel : 97O.479.2L39 tax: 97 0.47 9.2452 web: www.ci.rrail.co.us Location: OWNER SUFE& RODNEY E, & ELIZABET02/18/2003 Phone: 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL CO 81657 License: APPUOqNT SLIFER, RODNEY E. & EUZABET02|[8|2003 Phone:476-2421 Chris PEC Number: PEC030016 Conditional Use Permit to eliminate Unit 3 and cosolidate it with the Penthouse. BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Second By: vote: Conditions: Gary Hartman George Lamb 5-0 Action: APPROVED Date of Approval= 03ll2l2003 @nd: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: CON0005749 The applicant shall submit a plan to address the violations identified in the March 20, 2002letter from the Town of Vail Fire Department . The remedy for addressing the violations must be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Unit 3 consolidation and remodel. The remedy for the fire violations within Units 2, 3, and the Penthouse in the Gore Creek Plaza Building must be completed within 12 months of the building permit being issued. Warren Campbell PEC Fee Paidr $650,00 oI ,r*m APPlication for Review bY the Planning and Environmental Commission Deoartment of Community Development - zs io'itn itonttge Road, Vail, c'lorado 81657'- -iet: Szo.+2g.2139 fax: 970'479'2452 web: www.ci'vail'co'us ffiffiF#T$JilrX-r",:';nins and Environmentar.commission review must receive approvar prior to submittins a building permit appticatron. n*r" i.i.|. t" ltre submittal ,.qrit"t.^s for the partrcular aDproval that is requested' An application for planning ,.i-e""ir"..."tut cotn.'irrion iliL*'tt*oiu" ticepted until all required information is received by the commun.v rr?"iil-rri.lrri*o"p;ttram. inl' pi"i"a miv arto need to be reviewed bv the Town Council and/or the Design Review Board ' tr tr tr tr tr tr tr tr Type of APPlication and Fee: Rezoning Major Subdivision Minor SubdMision Exemption Plat Minor Amendment to an SDD New Special Development District Maior Amendment to an SDD Maior Amendment to an SDD ( no exterior n & ifi cation s) DescriPtion of the Request: dt ttre -E[ Conditional Use Permit/ tr-FloodPlain Modification tr Minor Exterior Alterauon tr Major Exterior Alteration tr DeveloPment Plan E nmendhent to a Development Plan tr Zoning C-ode Amendment E Variancetr Sign Variance - --"--\ n I( $o5v''-cL''.1^- $+oo $6s0 $800 $1s00 $2s0 $1300 $s0o $200 $1300 $1s00 $6s0 $6s0 $1000 $6000 $6000 $1250 Physical Address: parcel No,: ^tOtO At WnU (Contact Eagle co' Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no') Zoning: Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name of APPlicant: Mailing Address: E-mail Address: 9:,,fi\e'Iy =\ 7 da,aw 11) Phone: Page 1of5-01/18/02 rLp, **+ + **** +*** ** + +* ** ++ * + * ** * ** ***** *i * * * ++ + * + *** * * * ** * * * *** ****** * * +* * + + ** **** * *'t** ** * t****** TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Srat€ment +* ***'* {t***'* +l **** t t + *** **** * * ** * * * ++****+****** * * f**t * *'i ** * ** ** * i + ft + + * ** * * * **** * ****li* * * *** Statement Nruiber: R030003661 Amount: 9950.00 02/Lg/2OO3O3 r58 pM Payment Method: Check Init: JAR lilotation: 1360 Rodney E. Slifer Permit No: P8C030015 Type: PEc - Conditional Uee Parcel No: 210108213 002 Sl-tse Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: 230 Bridge Street., Penthouse Total Fees: $650.00 Thie Payments: $550.00 Total AIrIr pmts: $650,00 Balance: $0.00 * * + | +l * + +* * * * *,| *'* * * * * * ** * | * ** + + * * * ** * **** +** + * * * 'l 't'*'i '* '|*'l' * * 'l + + * + * * r! | + * * * * * * * ** * ** ** *'8 * * * * '3'i * * . ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Descniption Current Pmts PV OO1OOOO31125OO PEC APPLICATION FEES 650.00 7,i - t Land fitle Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUIION Dater fi2-18-2003 Prrysty Ad&tesl UMTS 3 AND PEIMHOUSE, GORE CREEK PI,AZA T(XiCOI'NTER CI()IDFORPTCKIIP) 0ur0rdsNumber: Y279333 t-), Land Title Guarantee Company Y0uR c0tuTAcTs Ilate: 02-18-2003 Our Order Number: V279333 hoperty Address: UNITS 3 AND PENTHOUSE, GORE CREEK PLAZA Buyer/Borrower: RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELZABETH W. SLIFER Seller/Owner: RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W. SLIFER If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contac{ one of the numbers below: For Closing Assistance:For fitle Assistance: Vail Title Dept. Roger Avila IO8 S. FRONTAGE RD. V/. P.O. BOX 357 VAIL, CO 81657 Phone:97O476-2251 Fax: 9704764534 BMail: ravila@ltgc.com Need-a map or directio-ns for your upgoming closing? Check out Land fitle's web site at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our 40 oflice locations. - ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES $77s - 00 F77s.00 Porm CONTACI TIIANK YOU FOR YOIJR ORDER! It o Title I.AND TITTE GUARANTEE COMPANV Ituv0tcE OwneT: RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W. SLIFER Property Address: UNITS 3 AND PENTHOUSE, GORE CREEK PLAZA Your Reference No.: When referring to this order, please reference our Order No. V279333 - CIIARGES. Information Binder $175.00 --Total--$175.00 Please make checks payable to: Land Title Guarantee Company P.O. Box 5,140 Denver, CO 80217 oe Chicago Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule A hoperty Address: UNITS 3 AND PENTHOUSE. GORE CREEK PLAZA l. Ellective Date: February 05, 2003 ar 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: Information Binder Proposed Insured: RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W. SLIFER Our0rderNo. V2793t3 Cust. Ref.: 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein isl A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hertof veted in: RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W, SLIFER 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OurOrderNo. V279333 TEGAT DESCBIPTIOIII CONDOMINIUM UNIT "PENTHOUSE". GORE CREEK PL}AA CONDOMINruM ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD AS DEFINED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, I97I IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 698 AND THE AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED OCTOBER 27, I97I IN BOOK 222 N PAGE 74, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. CONDOMINITJM UNIT NO. 3, GORE CREEK PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD AS DEF'INED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16. I97l IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 698 AND THE AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED OCTOBER N, TNI,IN BOOK 222 A'T PAGE 74, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. i o a ALTA COMMITMENT ftheduleB-Sectionl (g,equirmrents) Our Order No. y279333 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgago$ of the fult consideratiotr for the estate or hterest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrumen(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-rvit: Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable, Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. ,l ALTA COMMITMENT ScheduleB-Secrion2 @xceptions) Our Order No. V279333 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satlsfaction of the Company: I . Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not showtr by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encunrbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6, Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records.o the Treasurer's office. 7. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, ifany.. 8. In addition, the owner's policy will be subject to the mortgage, if any, noted in Section I of Schedule B hereof. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PFJMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED ruLY 12, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. IO. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 12, 1899, IN BOOK 48 AT PAGE 475. 1I. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFETTURX OR REVERTER CLAUSE. BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3@7 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRMINATE AGAINST HANDICAP PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST IO,I962,IN BOOK 174 AT PAGE 179 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1965 IN BOOK 187 AT PAGE 353. 12. THOSE PROVISIONS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTIONS, WHICH ARE A BURDEN TO THE CONDOMINIUM UNIT DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, ALTA COMMTTMENT ScheduleB-Section2 @xcepions) Our Order No. Vngn3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following urles the same are disposed of to the satisf,action of the Company: HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTTON 3607 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRMINATE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1971, IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 698 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 27,INI,IN BOOK 222 AT PAGE74. 13. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE RECORDED CONDOMINIUM MAP OF GORE CREEK PLAZA CONDOMINIUMS. 14. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. (THE ABOVE ITEMS AFFECT BOTH UNITS) 15. DEED OF TRUST DATED MARCH 05, 1999 FROM RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W. SLIFER TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPA}.IY TO SECURE THE SUM OF $I,25O,OOO.OO, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED MARCH 24, 1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 69019I. 16. DEED OF TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 FROM RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W, SLIFER TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECI.JRE THE SUM OF $9OO,OOO.OO, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1999, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 711594. (THE ABOVE ITEMS AFFECT 'PENTHOUSE'UNIT) 17. DEED OF TRUST DATED NOVEMBER OI, 2OO2 FROM RODNEY E. SLIFER AND ELIZABETH W. SLIFER TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK VAIL TO SECURE THE SUM OF $657,628.50, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED NOVEMBER 07 ,2002, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 812877. (THE ABOVE ITEM AFFECTS UNIT 3) t a LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOST]RE STAIEMEDTTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-l l-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing disuict. B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from rhe Counry Treasurer's authorized agent. C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September l, 1997 , CRS 30-10406 requires that all documenrs received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top rnargin ofat least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or filc any document that does not conform, exc€pt that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or frling of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the l*nders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been fumished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemniffing the Conrpany against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. D) The Cornpany must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken oD the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information: financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid infonnation by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-l l-123, notice is hereby given: A) Thal there is recorded evidence that a nineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial litelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. This notice applies to owner's policy cornmitments containing a mineral severanc€ instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are firllv satisfied. Form DISCLoSURE 9/O2/ ver 4.O 't 'l ^, JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies/Chicago Title Insurance Company and Land Title Guarantee Company July 1, 2001 We recognize and respect the privacy exDectations of todav's oonsumers and the requirements of aDDlicable federal and state priiacy laws. We believti that rirakiire you aware of liow we use volu non-public personal infoimation ('Personal Informatiori"), and to whom it is disclosecf, -will form the basis for a r6lationshib of tnist between us and the'public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that exptanation. We reserve thd righr ro change this Privacy' Statement from time to time consistenf with applicable'privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: * From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;* From ybir transactions with, or from the services 6eing plrformed by, us, our affiliates, or othe$;. tsrom our rnlernet weD sttes;* From the pu_blic records maintained by govemmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, oi from our affiliates or o0reisiand* From c6nsumer or other reporting agenbies. Our Policies Regarding the hotectlon of the Conlidentiality and Security of Your Personal Infomation We maintain physical. electronic and procedural safecuards to Drotect vour Personal lnformation from unauthorized access or intrision. We limit access td the Personal fiformation onlv to those emolovees who need such access in coilrection with providing products or services to you or for otber l'egitimate busineris purposes. Our Policies and h:actices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Infomation We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurl4ce companies, agents, and other real estate sbttlement service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Informatiori: * to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;+ to tfi-ird-party contractois or_service proiiders who provide servictis or perfomi markethg or other functioni ori our behalf: and* to othgrs witb whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. ln addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when vou direct or qive us Dermission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We allo mav'disclose your Personal lnformuion when otherwise permitted by apolicable orivacv laws $uch a:1. for exainple. wheir disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agr&inent, trirnsaction or relationihip with yiou. One of thg important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in rhe public domain. Such-documenti may contain your Personal lnformation. ' Right to Access Your Personal Infor:rration and Ability to Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion Certain states aford ygq t[e right to access your Personal lnformation and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom Your Persorial Inform-ation has beeir disclosed. Also. certain state6 afford vou the rieht to reou6st conectiori, amendment or deletion of your Personal lnformuion. We reserve tle ri!'ht, wherE permitrad by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the c6sts incurred in responding to such requests. All requests submitted to the Fidelity National Fiaancial Group of Companies/Chicago Title lnsurance Company shall bb in writing, and delivered to'the following address: Privacv Comoliance Officer Fidelit! Nati6nal Financial. Inc. 6Hi"g*f,YtfBli?3' Multiple Products or Senices I-f we proylde you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from ris. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Form PR IV.POt. CH I it+ Bob Frirch Situnark Hotel 123 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Charlie Viola Lodge at Vail 174 Gore Creek Vail, CCY8I657 Steve McDonald Bell Tower Condominium Association 143 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Tom Carpenter Village Center Condominium Association 124 Willow Bridge Road Vail, CO 81657 l'.,r=" MAY AFFE.T "ou* r*ott PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN thal the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Vail Town Code on March 10, 2003, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration of; An request for a final review of a Conditional Use Permit puruant to Section 12-78-5, Permifted and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an \/ existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr. /Gore Creek #laza Condominiums, Block 58, VailVillage First Filing. Y Applicant: Rod and Beth SliferPlanner: Waren Campbell A reguest for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan; a requestfor a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to the Vail Town Code, Title 12,Zoning Regulations, to allow forthe creation of a new zone district, Ski Base Recreation 2; and a request for a worksession to discuss the following applications: a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to Section 12-78,-13, Density Control, Zoning Regulations; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed rezoning of Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village sth Filing from Public Accommodation zone district (PA) to Parking zone district (P); a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council forthe proposed zoning of an unplatted parcel of land commonly referred to as the "trade parcel" and Lots 1 & 2, Mill Creek Subdivision to Ski Base Recreation ll zone district; a request for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code, to allow for the relocation of the common property line between Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, VailVillage sth Filing; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Gode of a proposed major subdivision, pursuant to Section 13-3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the platting of the "trade parcel"; a request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 16, Title 12, of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a "private off-street vehicle parking facility and public park" to be constructed and operated on Lots P3& J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5'n Filing; a request for an exterior alteration or modification, pursuant to Section 12-78-7 , Exterior Alteraiions or Modifications, Vail Town Code, to allow for an addition to the Lodge at Vail; a request for a variance ftom Section 12-21-10, Development Restricted, Vail Town Code, pursuant to Chapter 1 7, Variances, Zoning Regulations, to allow for the construction of multiple-family dwelling units on slopes in excess of 4oo/o; and a request for the establishment of an approved development plan to facilitate the construction of Vail's Front Door, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (A more complete metes and bounds legal description is available atthe Town of Vail Community Development Department) Applicant Vail Resorts, represented by Jay PetersonPlanner: George Ruther A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special Development District No. 37, pursuantto Section 12-94-6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment of the Tivoli Lodge, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5'n Filing. Applicant: Robert & Diane LazierPlanner: George Ruther A request for a recomm"nfion to the Vail Town Councit to, " rfiamendment to Special Development District No. 36, pursuant to Section 12-9A-10, Vail Town Code, to allow for a mixed- use hotel; a request for a final review of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-7 A-3,Vail Town Code, to allow for Type lll Employee Housing Units and a fractional fee club; and a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for a proposed rezoning of Lot 9A, Vail Village 2nd Filing from Heavy Service (HS) District to Public Accommodation (PA) District, located at 28.S. Frontage Rd. and 13 Vail Road/Lots 9A& 9C, Vail Village Znd Filing. Applicant Nicollet lsland Development Company Inc.Planner; Allison Ochs The applications and information about these proposals are available for public inspection during legular bu5iness hours at the Town of Vail Community Development Department office, 75 South Frontage Road. The public is invited to attend the project orientation held in the Town of Vail Community Development Department office and the site visits that precede the public hearing. Please call (970) 479-2138 for additional information. Sign language interpretation is available upon requesl with 24-hour notification. Please call (970) 479-2356, Telephone for the Hearing lmpaired, for additional information. Community Development Department Published February 21,2OO3 in the Vail Daity. '.. \ hi 216 Mqin Strcet o C-100 t Edwards, Colomtu 81632 .t: 970.926.8200 . x: 970.569.3221 .tom@ sl{erdesigns.com MEMORANDUM Date: To: Flom: RE CG: Doc{menl4 02.13.03 Phnning & Eryircnmental Commissirn, Toun of Vail Depafinent of Envircnmental Phnniry Tom Counter AlA, Prciect Manager fur $ifer llesgrs l/Yritten Statement: For Applicatio,n-TOV Prolect No. PRl0$0022, DRBB-0018 Rodtey & BethSlifer, Ownep In rcsoome b vour Conditional Lbe Pemit subnittal fom I submit the followim writbn Statement: Rod & Beth Slifer, Owners of the adjoining condominium unib at 193 Gore Greek known as the Penthouse and Unit 3, which have a common wall at a sfiairwell, wish to improve the properties in the following manner: (a) The property use will be residential 6 it is now, the Penthor.se will be revised to meet the growing needs of this bmily as their daughter grovt s into a young adult. No change in use or interior squae foobge is proposed.(1)Add a doorway between the unib at the stainrell shown on the Attached Plan.(2)Demolish and rebuild some interior walb to reconfigure the bedroons & bathroons in Unit 3 in order to create a family recreation room.(3)Reconfigure one Penthouse bathroom in order to add a bathtub.(4)Add five bet on the north side of the existing deck, over the exbting roof at the north end of the Penthotse, off the kitchen.(5)Add an egress window for the bedroom which will be located at the west side of Unit 3.(see Phns) (b) Thb renovation should have no impact on the development objectives of the town. (c) No impact is anticipated on public facilities of the town. (d) No significant impact ls anticipated regarding traffic. One new driver is anticipabd. (e) No impact is anticipated regading the character of the area or the bulk of the use. lf lhere are any further questiors regarding the planning of thb properly, pleae call Tom Counbr AIA at Slifer Desigrs for clarif ication. End of Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: o MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department March 10,2003 A request for a final review of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant lo Section 12-78-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses;Above Second Floor, Vail Town Code, to allow for the elimination of an existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1't Filing. Applicant: Rodney and Beth Slifer, represenled by Tom Counler of Slifer Designs Planner: WarrenCamobell I. SUMMARY The applicants, Rodney and Beth Slifer, represented by Tom Counter of Slifer Designs, are requesting a conditional use permil as outlined in Section 12-16-2 (Conditional Use Permit), VailTown Code, located at 193 Gore Creek Driveilot A, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1sr Filing. The conditional use permit is requested to allow lhe applicants to eliminate an existing dwelling unit (unit 3) in the Gore Creek Plaza Building. Based upon Staff's review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum, and the plans and documents presenled, the Community Development Departmenl recommends approval of this request subject to the findings and conditions noted in Section lX of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicants are proposing to eliminate unit 3 and combine it with the existing penthouse in the Gore Greek Building (attachment A). This proposal requires a conditional use permit per Section 12-78.5 (Permitled and Conditional Uses; Above Second Floor), Vail Town Code, which states that "Any permitted or condilional use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unit, or any portion thereof, shall require a conditional use permit.' The proposal utilizes an existing stairwell which leads from the penthouse on the fifth floor and unil 3 on the fourth floor. The only modification which will be made to connect the two units is the inslallation of a new doorway. This combining ol the two units includes a remodel of unit 3. This proposal does not include the incorporalion of any common hallways or other areas into the square foolage of unil 3 (attachment B). III. BACKGROUND . This property is a portion ol the original Town of Vail which was made legal by election on Augusl23, 1966 and court order on August 26, 1966. The property is currently zoned Commercial Core 1 (CC1 ).. On July 24, 1989, the applicant received Planning and Environmental t Commission approval of a height variance in order to conslruct an addition to the penthouse. That approval resulled in the addition of 756 square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA).. On March 23, 1998, the applicant received Planning and Environmental Commission approval of a conditional use permit to eliminate a dwelling unit (unit 2) after the applicant withdrew the request for a height and site coverage variance (attachment D). Unit 2 is currently used as a lower level of the penthouse.. On. April 27, 1998, the applicant returned to the Planning and Environmental Commission requesting a site coverage and height variance for thal portion of the proposal withdrawn at the March 23, 1998 meeting. The application was denied.. On June 23, 1998, the applicant appealed the denial of the height and site coverage variance to the Town Council. Town Council voted to uphold the action of the Planning and Environmental Commission.. Several applications for the penthouse have been approved over the years including a remodel in 1990 and awnings in 2000. ' On March 20, 2002, the Town of Vail Fire Department sent a letter outlining several code violations which existed at the Gore Creek Building (Attachment C). The condominium association was given until Seplember 20, 2003 to develop a plan to address the violations which the lire departmenl musl approve. That letter also gave the condominium association 18 months from September 20, 2003 to complete the improvements required by the plan. IV. ROLES OF REVIEWING BODIES Order of Review: Generally, applications will be reviewed first by the Planning and Environmental Commission for acceptability of use and then by the Design Review Board lor compliance of proposed buildings and site planning. Planning and Environmental Commission: Action: The Planning and Environmental Commission is responsible for final approval/denial/approval with conditions of Conditional Use Permits. The Planning and Environmental Gommission is responsible for evaluating a proposal for: 1. Relationship and impact ol the use on development objectives of the Town. 2. Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public lacilities needs. 3. Effecl upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, aulomotive and pedeslrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. 4. Elfect upon the character ol the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation lo surrounding uses. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed use. 6. The environmental impact reporl concerning the proposed use, if an environmental impact report is required by Chapter 12 of this Title. Conformance wilh develooment standards of zone district Lot area Setbacks Building Height Density GRFA Site coverage Landscape area Parking and loading Miligation of development impacts Design Review Board; Action:The Design Review Board has NO review authority on a Conditional Use Permit, but must review any accompanying Design Review Board application. The Design Review Board is responsible for evaluating the Design Review Board proposal lor: Architectural compatibilily with other struclures, the land and surroundings Fitting buildings into landscape Configuration of building and grading ol a site which respects the topography Removal/Preservation of trees and native vegetation Adequate provision for snow storage on-sile Acceptability of building materials and colors Acceptabilily of roof elemenls, eaves, overhangs, and other building forms Provision ol landscape and drainage Provision of fencing, walls, and accessory slructures Circulation and access to a site including parking, and site distances Location and design of salellite dishes Provision of ouldoor lighting The design of parks Town Council: Actions of Design Review Board or Planning and Environmental Commission may be appealed to the Town Council or by the Town Council. Town Council evaluates whether or not the Planning and Environmental Commission or Design Review Board erred with approvals or denials and can uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the board's decision. Staff : The staff is responsible for ensuring that all submittal requirements are provided and plans conform lo the technical requirements of the Zoning Regulations. The staff also advises the applicant as to compliance with the design guidelines. Staff provides a stalf memorandum containing background on the property and provides a staff evaluation of the project with respect to the required criteria and findings, and a recommendation on approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Staff also facililates the review process. V. APPLICABLE PLANNING DOCUMENTS TOWN OF VAIL ZONING REGULATIONS 12-7B CommercialCore 1 (CCl) District 12-78-l: Purpose: The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to provide sites and to maintain the unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominantly pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 District is intended to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The District regulations in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescibe site development standards that are intended to ensure the maintenance and preseruation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings fronting on pedestrianways and public greenways, and to ensure continuation of the building scale and architecturalqualities that distinguish the Village. (Ord. 21(1980) I 1) 12-78-5: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES;ABOVE SECOND FLOOR: (in part) A. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the second floor above grade: Lodges. M u lti pl e -famil y res ide nti al dwell i ngs. B. Conditional Uses: The following uses shall be permifted on any floor above the second floor above grade, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 16 of this Title. Anv permitted or conditional use which eliminates anv existina dwellina or accommodation unit. or anv oortion thereof. shall require a conditional use permit. Such uses may include: 1 2-78-8: CONDTTIONAL USES; FACTORS APPLTCABLE: ln considering, in accordance with chapter 16 of this title, an application for a conditional use permit within commercial core 1 district, the tollowing development lactors shall be applicable: A. Effects of vehicular traffic on iommercial core 1 district. B. Reduction of vehicular traffic in commercial core 1 district. C. Reduction of nonessential off street parking. D. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles. E. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. F. Continuance of the various commercial, residential, and public uses r'h commercial core 1 district so as to maintain the existing character of the area. G. Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design in commercial core 1 district so as lo maintain the existing character of the area. H. Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the environment of commercial core 1 district. (Ord. 16(1975) S 4) 12-78-20: VAIL VILLAGE URBAN DESlcN PLAN: A. Adoption: The Vailvillage urban design guide plan and design considerations are adopted for the purposes of maintaining and preserving the character and vitality of the Vail village (CCI) and to guide the future alteration, change and improvement in CCl district. Copies of the Vail village design guide plan and design considerations shall be on file in the department of community development. 12-16: Conditional Use Permits | 2-l 6-1 : Purpose; Limitations: ln order to provide the tlexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of this title, specified uses are permifted in certain districts subject to the granting of a conditional use permit. Because of their unusual or special characteristics, conditional uses require review so that they may be located properly with respect to the purposes of this title and with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. The review process prescribed in this chapter is intended to assure compatibility and harmonious development betvveen conditional uses and surrounding properties in the Town at large. Uses listed as conditional uses in the various districts may be permitted subject to such conditions and limitations as the Town may prescribe to insure that the location and operation of the conditional uses will be in accordance with the development objectives of the Town and will not be detrimental to other uses or properties. Where conditions cannot be devised, to achieve these objectives, applications for conditional use permits shall be denied. 12-16-5: Planning and Environmental Commission Action: A. Possible Range Of Action: Within thirty (30) days of the application for a public hearing on a conditional use permit, the planning and environmental commission shall act on the application. The commission may approve the application as submitted or may approve the application subject to such modifications or conditions as it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this title, or the commission may deny the application. A conditional use permit may be revocable, may be granted for a limited time period, or may be granted subject to such other conditions as the commission may prescribe. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, requiring special sefbacks, open spaces, fences or walls, landscaping or screening, and street dedication and improvement; regulation of vehicular access and parking, signs, illumination, and hours and methods of operation; control of potential nuisances; prescription of standards for maintenance of buildings and grounds; and presciption of development schedules. B. Variances: A conditional use permit shall not grant variances, but action on a variance may be considered concurrently with a conditional use permit application on the same site. Variances shall be granted in accordance with the procedure prescribed in chapter 17 of this title. (Ord. 16(1978) $ 4(b): Ord. 8(1973) S 18.500) 1 2- | 6-8 :.P.ermit Approval and Effect: Approval of a conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion or the use for which the approval has been granted has not commenced within two (2) years from when the approvalbecomes final. (Ord. 10(1998) g 10: Ord. 4S(1991) g 1: ord.l6(1e78) S 4(d)) Vail Village Master Plan The Vail Village Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide to the staff, review boards and Town Council in analyzing proposals for developmenl in Vail Village. The most significant elemenls of the Master Plan are the goals, objectives, policies and action steps. They are the working tools of the Master Plan. They establish the broad framework and vision, but also layout the specific policies and action steps that will be used to implement the Plan. The plan focuses primarily on architecture, redevelopment, economic health, open space, and circulation. Goal #1 : Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 Obiective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilites. Goal #2: To foster a strong tourist industry and promote year-around eoonomic health and viability for the Village and for the community as a whole. 2.3 Obiective: Increase the number of residential units available for short lerm overnight accommodation. Goal #5: Increase and improve the capacity, efficiency, and aesthetics of the lransporlation and circulation system throughoul the village. Vail Land Use Plan The Vail Land Use Plan is intended to serve as a basis from which future land use decisions may be made within the Town of Vail. The goals, as articulated within the Land Use Plan, are meant to be used as adopted policy guidelines in the review process for new development proposals. The Land Use Plan is not intended to be regulatory in nature, but is intended to provide a general framework to guide decision making. Where the land use categories and zoning conflict, existing zoning controls development on a site. 1,1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the Dermanent resident. t.\) 1.4 VI. SITE ANALYSIS Zoning: Land Use Plan Designation: Current Land Use: Develooment Standard Lot Area: Setbacks: Fronl: Sides: Rear: Building Height: Site Coverage: Density: Parking: Commercial Core 1 Village Master Plan Residential/Commercial Allowed/Required Existino 5,000 sq. ft. 7,553 sq. fl. None Required 14'-20' None Required 0.5'-10' None Required 0.5'-3' 33'-43' up to 40% 33'-43' (11%) 33'or less 60% 33'or less (17%) Greater lhan 43' (72/") 6,043 sq. fl. (80%) 6,084 sq. ft. (80.6%) No Change 6,043 sq. ft. (80%) 6,043 sq. ft. (80%) No Change 6 spaces(residential) 5 spaces(residential) No Change The qualily of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. The original theme of the old Village Core should be carried into new development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriale in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the marketplace demands for a full range oJ housing types. Prooosed No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change vll. North: South: East: West: SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Land Use Open Space Residential/Commercial Residential/Commercial Residential/Commercial Zonino Commercial Core Commercial Core Commercial Core Commercial Core VIII. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The review criteria for a request of lhis nature are established by the Town Code, The proposed elimination of a dwelling unit is located within lhe Commercial Gore 1 zone district. Therefore, this proposal is subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter '1 2-16, Vail Town Code. A. Consideration of Faclors Reoardino Conditional Use Permits: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. Staff believes there are minimal negative impacls created by the proposal on the development objeclives of the Town. The site is currently nonconforming in regards to many of the zoning requiremenls and this request does not increase that level of nonconformily. The proposal does not violate the goals of the Vail Village Master Plan. In order lo have successful commercial areas it is necessary to obtain the critical mass ol individuals spending time in the Village and Lionshead which can support the retail components. The Town promoles the creation of "hot beds or live beds" in all new development as this type of lodging provides the greatest opportunity to have the maximum number of individuals staying in the commercial areas. The Vail Village Masler Plan identifies as an objective the need to increase the number of resideirtial units (Objective 2.3). lt is a concern thal the loss of existing dwelling unils creales less of an opportunity to achieve the critical mass of guests in the commercial areas. While this proposal may not have a significant impact, there is concern that proposals of this type if multiplied in number could signilicantly deplete the opportunity to have the optimum number of individuals in the commercial areas. Certain uses are listed as conditional uses because of their unusual or special characteristics. The conditional use review process is required as a particular use has the potential to have a negative impact on surrounding properties. Through the review process the Planning and Environmenlal Commission examines a particular use in terms of operation and impacts. The Commission can then apply conditions on the operation of the use in order to mitigate the negative impacts of the use and to assure compalibility and harmonious 2. development between the conditional use and the surrounding properties. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution ol population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. Staff believes that this proposal will have no significant impact on the above mentioned ilems. The proposed elimination of a dwelling unit will not place an increased demand upon public inlraslructure and facilities. fn a leller dated March 20, 2002, the Vail Fire Department enumerated several code violation which exist within the Gore Creek Building (Attachment C). That letter establishes a timeframe for developing a plan to address the violations and a timeframe for implementing that plan. Per the letter the date by which a plan must be approved by the Vail Fire Department is September 20, 2003. Staff is requesting that il this proposal is approved lhat a condition requiring an approved plan for addressing the concerns to be in place prior to issuing a building permit. Eflect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas, Staff believes that this proposal will have no negative impact on the above mentioned items. Per Section 12-10-10 (Parking Requirement Schedules), Vail Town Code, the required parking for the site is 1.4 parking spaces per residential unit. There are currently four units which would require six spaces. There are currently five parking spaces. This proposal would reduced the required parking by 1.4 parking spaces and lherefore only require five parking spaces for the three remaining residential units. According lo the Institute ol Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 6'n Edition the average number of lrips generated per day are 5.86 for a residential condo. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. The incorporation and remodel of unit 3 into the penthouse will have no exterior impact. The applicants are proposing to make a small addition of 105 square feet to an existing desk on the fifth floor of the buibing wilh this proposal, This expansion does not require review by the Planning and Environmenlal Commission. An application for the exterior deck was reviewed by the Design Review Board on March 5, 2003 and was tabled. 4. 7. 8. 5. Affects of vehicular traffic on Commercial Core 1 District. The elimination of one dwelling unil could polentially reduce the numbers of vehicle trips into the parking structure below the Gore Creek Building. Therefore, the affects of the request upon vehicular traffic are posilive. 6. Reduction of vehicular traffic in Commercial Core 1 District. Similar, lo lhe previous described criteria, slaff believes the elimination of one dwelling unit could have a positive impact upon the reduction of vehicular traffic. Reduction of nonessential oft street parking. Staff believes the proposed elimination of one dwelling unit will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. Control of delivery, pickup, and service vehicles. Staff believes the proposed request will have minimal, if any, negalive impacts on the above described criteria. 9. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. Stalf believes the proposed requesl will have no negative impacts on the above described crlteria. 10. Continuance of the various commercial, residential, and public uses in Commercial Core 1 District so as to maintain the existing character of the area. There is a need 1o have a certain ration of dwelling unils per commercial square footage in order to have a viable economic village. However, stalf believes the proposed requesl will have minimal negalive impacts on the above described criteria. 11. Control quality of construclion, architeclural design, and landscape design in Commercial Core 1 District so as to maintain the existing character of the area. Staff believes the proposed request will have no negative impacls on the above described criteria. All exterior changes will be reviewed by the Design Review Board and will be required to adhere to the Vail Village Master Plan and other applicable documents. 12. Effects of noise, odor, dust, smoke, and other factors on the environmenl of Commercial Core 1 District. (Ord. 16(1975) g 4) Staff believes the proposed request will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. 10 tx. B. The Plannino and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before qrantino a conditional use permit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code and the purposes of the Commercial Core 1 zone district. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under i . which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or malerially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Thal the proposed use will comply with each ol the applicable provisions of the conditional use permit section of the zoning code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of a conditional use permit, to allow for the elimination of a dwelling unit, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1sI Filing. Staffs recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria in Section Vlll of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented, subject to the following findings: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of the condilional use permit section of the zoning code and lhe purposes of lhe Commercial Core 'l zone district. 2. That the proposed location ol the use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the conditional use permil section of the zoning code. Should lhe Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this conditional use permit request, the Community Development Department recommends the followino conditions: 1. The applicant shall submil a plan to address the violalions identified in the March 20, 2002letter from lhe Town of Vail Fire Departmenl. The remedy for addressing the violations musl be approved by staif prior to the issuance of a building permit lor the unit 3 consolidation and remodel. 11 X. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Floor Plan and Elevation C. Fire Department Letter Dated March 20,2000 D.Statf Report and Minutes from March n, 1998 Planning and Environmental Commission meeting. _ . E. Publication Nolice ard Affidavit of Publication .12 t'z cl IL@ NC r1?n>rENO? dOI ION -IJY>d lrlNl cr ttxtt - A!.LN: zr -tlM ^trN3tr l|Nn r{ noodaf€ t]YV r\/d{u2n!l.g ar Aoazaae '1'1V}, 'l\fd/U2ftiJ-g --T---I a:ngva........- NMoHg gNVHEa o rooa g :luauqcellv -€# l-lhr r Jr\r..r rr rd v av ro ,zr::!i 3UO5 HfJt-19 Ft*ltsl[i|lllsrrr tafaafara :n/ Gltaaa:ta -JaoG?DIOlrlErr-41I5la|. {ll lll [f'*aEa l{rtlrel [LF-:llra:uir DRAFT- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION t' I ES YN6{ ooz u o ood 6 = o ofiH' P'66c,#e I I I I+ oFv lL Pt ttt{l}fg AND IJE|TAI crl^N€€ 000R Ta nrir9ov{ TO HAlcll ExlsTlfl9 oECK r{1190l.6 <- E$TRY ---: -=- --fl'tilllER:I Kt l%rl#l l$lilcrtDai$ FFqI a.rrr rur I | | | |I rltl.-r. I T-'l----r-----------'lI ltlE,c!-Darc t l-l------f----------------1 ' -6E I l-l--l------------JI rrE rrra:ar | | | I II rnrrE.{ | l-l----T-------l lv YuUf\ LNw , SLIFER GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDING, UNIT #3 VAIL. COLORADO | !D llo |tllat {,la*ttrt, t t*"I tD 2.2 I DRAFT- NOT EOR 6ONSTRU6TION ii}tl.r j+s {.lft{ !'.;i li 'r|.rll/,f$(DECK) l'.t ' .i: r i ;l | ,, I I lo.{mtl_.tt lffi l$ifertlhsignsl FF- I mlr|r! lrt I | | | || !orr.-rD I l'-T-----l-----------lI orrcl, @![rD ar.i! | l---t-----f-----------lIlg:m.cal|l||||I t4 tELtat | | | | |I 'trrrlrlrrcr...'r I T-1----T---------l SLIFER CORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDIN6. PENTHOUSE VAIL. COLORALTO lL----rsl-nnl rl' I dinrft |l* I rn z.rt_ ut T i9 ROOF EELA^ oeoK eeLarl PRAFT- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5LlFER GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDIN6. PENTHOUSE VAIL, COLORADO $i ,# lta trf, t|ttttt m c-r6D'II.'{III I l|i ti.Llllt it5j!1at.llt|ltls.lr IItT E't* oaE It ttl ctn PLAN @ECK) DRAFT_ NCT FCR, CONSTRU6TION lr8llll-IB9 @+' _ 2fip FLaoQ+ PRa- o3eo DEoK EXENTgION-------1 RAI;II{€ TO MATCH EXIgT]N€ \r _-\. _ I ""O"6EO EGRE5g l.{lNPOt,{ -_-\TO MATCH EXl9TrN6 |ttN9OA5 \() 2b x 96',^ttlD9}] - ir.| -t-ltl <DlEPlleee.la]llr _P",OPO3zA tE4K EXE|ri9|ON ,/ RAtLrNe To HATor.r ExrSTlNe , ua ult glEf !{m c-tl ttlrG, ol!|lD llE t*l't6.rt al! l?tL.Lll rtr.sttlti.btaianf gt tlE crt!nl atli! Era!9LIFER GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDIN6, PENTHOUSEi UNIT 3 VAIL. COLOMLTO !a t|ll !|tat rD 3.r _-* ll il_ \ PROFa3eD -DEcK NOTE: RAILIN6 ?O MATCH EXI9III{6 PRAFT_ NOT FOR CON3TRU6TION IFIMI}IAEE' 'iT FLAOR Av altAvee ooo? 70 ,^rlNDof{ TO MATCH E.XI9ITN6 PICK XtNpO 9 --------------- i) _+ t l)elrSro rt tri mltl $m c-tatrl cq,[Drcfll a'lEalar '|!.olalrnStltl|lrll.lr tttltB ttt Edlt* a!! latt gLIFER GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILL)ING. PENTHOUSE/ UNIT 3 VAIL, COLORAL]O crol|:t rD 3.2 Vail Fire & Emergency Services 42 LYest Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2250 March 20, 2002 Gore Creek Plaza Coniominium Association C/o Slifer Management 143 East Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Gore Creek Plaza Dear Gore Creek Plaza Condominium Association; It has come to our attention through vsrious building permit applications and physical inspections, the Gore Creek Plaza building, 193 Gore Creek Drive, Vail, Eagle Coanfit, Colorado, 81657, has namerous code violations in need of abatemenl The code issues have been evaluated and beenfourtd to be in violation of curuent code and are not subject to any "grandfather" provision. Many of the issues identifted are long standing violations. The current use(s) within the building, thefrequency of use, proximity to adjacent buildings, bailding height, and condition of the building and associated building features, in the aggregate, presents a life safety risk to the occupants- Specific issues include but are not limited to: L The building has been detemined to be of ordinary combustible construction. Building heightfor ordinary construction is limited to three stories. The Gore Creek Plaza Building has four stoies. The only provision in cawent and past building and fire codes to allow foar stories of combustible construction is to hsve a code compliant fire sprinkler system installed. 2. Exiting capacity from upper floors is limited to a spiral staircase, The occapant load is signiJicantly limited where spiral staircases are used as a means of egress. The existing egress pattern from the north side of the building is in need. of evaluation. 3- The existing interior staircase has a combustible fuel load in excess of maximum flame spread and smoke contribution as prescribed under current codes. Interior stairways are limited to materials with a Class A Jlame spread" Attachment: C Gore Creek Plaza Building .Page 2 4. There is a non-fire rated utility shart that appearc to run from the basement through the upper floorc. This shaft has plywood doors, h open to intefior combustible wood framing, and contains telephone and some electrical wiring. This shaft should be Jbe rated to prevent tlame spreadfrom floor to floor and to the interior walls. 5. There is a slip joint cast pipe in the soathwest corner of the floor of the boiler room. The top two inches of the pipe are acposed to atmosphere. The concern is the pipe does not have sufficient cover to prevent possible slippage or prevent free4ing. The water entry station is in need of backtlow prevention to comply with state water quality control regulations. 6. The elevator should have recall capacity in accordance with ANSI standards, It is unclear the cunent elevator control circuits have such capability. llle have seen a signiJicant trend towards improving Vail's abilig to provide world class service and amenities. We would entertain a reasonable plan to address the idenffied issues. Under the Town of VaiI Manicipal Code, title 10, Sections 10-1-1 through 10-1-4, the appendix of the Undorm Fire Code and Unifurm Building Code contain provisions to address existing buildings. The code allows an l&-month periodfrom date of notijication to provide plans and an L9-month peiod thereafter to complete abatement procedures. The most successful projects have been those in which the building owner(s) or association(s) engaged the assistance of a design professional (or team) such as a licensed architect and/or a Jire protection engineer. The design team can lend assistance towards identiJication of alternate materials and methods, scope and sequence, value engineering, design parameters, and related elements. Please consider this letter to be the initial notification. If you wish to discuss this matter in more detail, please contact this office and we can arT ange a suitable time and location Sincerely, Michael McGee Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal cc: John Gulick, Fire Chief Lt Mike Vaughan, Fire Prevention Ol/icer Charlie Davis, Building Depertment TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT:. MEMORANDUM Planning and Environmental Commission Community Development Department March 23, 1998 A request for a conditional Use permit, a Minor cc1 Exterior Alteralion, a building height variance and a site coverage variance, to allow for a bay addition.to lhepenthouse unit and to eliminate a dwelling unit, located ai 193-Gore creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-8, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Rodney & Beth Slifer, represented by Jim BucknerPlanner: George Ruther I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REAUESTS The applicants, Rodney and Beth Slifer, represented by Jim Buckner of Slifer Designs, are requesting a condilional use permit to allow for the elimination of a dwelling unit lo&ted in the Gore Creek Plaza Building at 193 Gore Creek Drive. The applicants are proposing to eliminate Unit #2 in the Gore Creek Plaza Condominiums. The elimination will be accomplished by connecling Unit #2 with the penthouse unit above. The proposed connection will be accommodated by constructing an interior stairway connecting the two units. Pursuant to Section 12-7b-5b (Permitted and conditional uses; above 2nd floor); the following uses shall be permitted on any floor above the 2nd floor above grade subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. "Any permitted or condilional use which eliminates any existing dwelling or accommodation unil, or any portion thereof, shall require a conditional use permit." The applicants had originally proposed a minor CC1 exterior alieration, a building height variance and a site coverage variance to allow for the construction of a bay addition onto the westem side of the penthouse unit. However, upon staff's review of lhe Town;s files, it was determined that no GRFA remains available for this property. Since no GRFA remains available, the applicantshave withdrawn their requesls forlhe minor CC'l exterior alteration, the height anO tne iite coverage variance at this time. Therefore, the staff will not be reviewing the minor exterior alteration or either of the variances as part of this request. II. BACKGROUND In reviewing this conditional use permit request, staff relied upon the goals, policies and objectives outlined in the various Town of Vail planning documents. itre totiowing is a summary of staff's review of the Town's planning documents:s rvworyililY f :\everyone\pec\m emos\98\slif er. 323 Attachment D Municioal Code According to Section 12-78-1, the purpose of the Commercial Core 1 Zone District is intended to: "provide sites and to maintain a unique character of the Vail Village commercial area, with its mixture of lodges and commercial establishments in a predominately pedestrian environment. The Commercial Core 1 district is intended lo insure adequate light, air, gPen space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of buildings and uses. The district regulations, in accordance with the Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan and Design Considerations prescribed site development slandards that are intended tb insure the maintenance and preservation of the tightly clustered arrangements of buildings frondng on pedestrian ways and public greenways, and to insure the continuation of the building scale and architectural qualities that distinguish the Village." Vail Land Use Plan 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recrealional uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.4 The original theme of the old Village Core should be canied into new development in the Village Core through continued implementation of the Urban Design Guide plan. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of lhe additional groMh in existing developed areas (infill areas). 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands for a full range of housing types. Vail Village Master Ptan Goal #1 Encourage high quality redevelopment while preserving the unique architectural scale of the Village in order to sustain its sense of community and identity. 1.2 Obiective:Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSIDERATION CRITERIA AND FINDINGS In accordance wilh Chapler 16 of the Municipal Code, an application for a conditional use permit within commercial core 1, the following development factors shall be applicable: ( 1.Relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. staff believes the applicant's request lo eliminate a dwelling unit in the Gore creek Plaza Building will have minimal negative impacts on the development objectives of the Town. Staff does recognize however, that one of the primary objectives of the commercial core 1 zone District is to provide an ample bedbase to support the commercial uses located in Vail Village. ' - Effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation , ,* facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facilities needs. staff believes the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit will have minimal negative impacts on the above described criteria. Effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking areas. staff believes the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit will have no negative impacls on the above described criteria. Effect upon the character ofthe area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. No exterior changes are proposed with this request. Therefore, staff believes there will be no negative impacts on the above described criteria. Affects of vehicular traffic on the Commercial Core 1 Zone District. The elimination of one dwelling unit could potentially reduce the numbers of vehicle trips into commercial core 1 and the Parking structure beneath the Gore creek Plaza Building. Therefore, the affects of the request upon vehicular traffic in Commercial Core 1 are positive. Reduction of vehicular traffic in the Commercial Core 1 Zone Distric,t. Similar to the previously described crileria, staff believes the elimination of one dwelling unit could have a positive impact upon the reduction of vehicular traffic in Commercial Core 1. Staff, however, recognizes that the reduction would most likely be negligible. Red u ction of no n-essentia I off-street pa rkin g. Staff believes the proposed elimination of one dwelling unit will have no negative impacts on lhe above described criteria. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. J 8. Control of delivery, pick-up, and sewice vehicles. /: ... Staff believes the proposed request will have minimal, if any, negative impacts on t' ' the above described criteria.9. Development of public spaces for use by pedestrians. Staff believes the proposed requesl will have no negative impacts on the above described crileria. 10. .- - Continuance of the various commercial, residential and public uses in the r ,., Commercial Core 1 Zone District, so as to maintain the existing character of the area. Staff believes the proposed request will have minimal negative impacts on the above described criteria. 11. Control quality of construction, architectural design, and landscape design in Commercial Core I Zone District, so as to maintain the existing charaster of the area. Slaff believes the proposed request will have no negative impacts on the above described criteria. 12. Affects of noise, odor, dust, smoke and otherfactors on the environment of the Commercial Core l Zone Distriqt. ( Staff believes the proposed request will have no negalive impacts on the above described criteria. The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the followino findinos before granting a conditional use oermit: 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accordance with the purposes of this litle and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed localion of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvemenls in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this Title. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Communi$ Development Department recommends approval of the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to allow for the elimination and subsequent conneclion of two dwelling units within the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Drive. Siaffs recommendation of approval is based upon our review of the criteria outlined in Section lll of this memorandum. Staff recommends that should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to grant an approval of this request, that the following findings be made: 1' That the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit is in accordance with the purpose sestion of the Commercial Core 1 Zone District. 2. That the proposed location of the dwelling unit to be eliminated will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Gore Creek plaza Building. 3. That the proposed elimination of the dwelling unit complies with each of the ,. applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. o Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add. They did not. John Schofield disclosed that he had a business relationship with the owner, but that it wouldn't influence him. Greg Amsden had no comments. Galen Aasland stated the unique nature of this lot constituted a hardship' Diane Goldbn had no comments. Greg Moffet agreed with Galen's comments. Greg Amsden made a motion for approval. John Schofield seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. S. A request for a Conditional Use Permit, a Minor CC1 Exterior Alteration, a building heighl variance and a site coverage variance, to allow for a bay additionand to eliminate a dwelling unii, located at 19i Gore Creek Drive/Lot A, Block 5-B, Vail Mllage 1st Filing' Applicant: Rodney & Beth Slifer' represenled by Jim Buckner Planner: George Ruther George Ruther gave an overview of the slaff memo. Greg Moffet asked if the applicant had anything to add' GalEn Aasland stated the request was in accordance with the current zoning. Diane Golden had no comments' John Schofield had no comments. Greg Amsden had no c,omments. Greg Moffet agreed that it was in accordance with the cunent zoning' John schofield made a motion for approval for the conditional use permit only' as the applicant had withdrawn the minor cc1 exterior alteration, the building height variance and the site coverage variance. Galen Aasland seconded the motion. The motion passed bY a vote of 5-0. Plrnning and Environmcnlrl Commission Minutes March 23, 1998 v '\y *trrr MAYAFFE.T YouR PRoPr# PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 12-3-6 of the Vail Town Code on March 10, 2003, at 2:00 P.M. in the Town of Vail Municipal Building. In consideration ot An request for a final review of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 12-78-5, Permitted and Conditional Uses, Above Second Floor, Vail Town Coda, to allow for the elimination of an \/ existing dwelling unit in the Gore Creek Plaza Building, located at 193 Gore Creek Dr. /Gore Creek SPlaza Condominiums, Block 58, VailVillage First Filing. Y Applicant:. . Rod and Beth SliferPlanner: Warren Campbell A request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Land Use Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed amendment to the Vail Village Master Plan; a request for a final review of a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of e text amendment to the Vail Town Code, Title 12, Zoning Regulations, to allow for the creation of a new zone district, Ski Base Recreation 2; and a request for a worksession to discuss the following applications: a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a text amendment to Section 12-78.13, Density Control, Zoning Regulations; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council of a proposed rezoning of Lots P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5m Filing from Public Accommodation zone district (PA) to Parking zone district (P); a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the proposed zoning of an unplatted parcel of land commonly referred to as the "trade parcel" and Lots 1 & 2, Mill Creek Subdivision to Ski Base Recreation ll zone district; a request for a minor subdivision, pursuant to Title 13, Subdivision Regulations, Vail Town Code, to a.llow for the relocation of the common property line between LoE P3 & J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5m Filing; a request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Code of a proposed major subdivision, pursuant to Section 1$3, Major Subdivision, Vail Town Code, to allow for the platting of the "trade parcel"; a request for a conditional use permit, pursuant to Chapter 16, Title 12, of the Vail Town Code, to allow for a "private off-street vehicte parking facility and public park" to be constructed and operated on Lots P3&J,Block5A,Vail VillageStnFiling; arequestforanexterioralterationormodification,pursuant toSection 12-78-T,ExteriorAlterationsorModifications,VailTownCode,toallowforanadditionto the Lodge at Vail; a request for a variance from Section 12-21-10, Development Restricted, Vail Town Code, pursuantto Chapter 17, Variances, Zoning Regulations, to allowforthe construction of multiple-family dwelling units on slopes in excess of 40%; and a request forthe establishment of an approved development plan to facilitate the construction of Vail's Front Door, and setting forth details in regard thereto. (A more complete metes and bounds legal description is available at the Town of Vail Community Development Department) Applicant Vail Resorts, represented by Jay PetersonPlanner: George Ruther A request for a recommendation to the Vail Town Council for the establishment of Special Development District No. 37, pursuantto Section 12-94-6, Development Plan, Vail Town Code, to allow for the redevelopment oi the Tivoli Lodge, located at 386 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village sth Filing. Applicant: Robert & Diane LazierPlanner: George Ruther Attaehment: E Bob Fritch Sitanart Hotel 123 Gore Creek Drive Vail, C0 81657 Charlie Viola Indgc at Vail 174 Gore Creek vait, Cot't657 Steve McDonald Bell Tower Condominium Association 143 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Tom Carpcnter Village Center Condominium Association 124 WillowBridgeRoad Vail, CO 81657 Design Review Board ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97O.479.2452 web: www.ci.vail.co.us Prciect Namer Slifer staircase addition DRB Number: DR8030525 Project Description: Addition of steel spiml staircase from penthouse units to deck on north side of residence Pafticipantsr OWNER SUFER, RODNEY E. & EUZABETIL|Z4|ZO03 Phonet 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL CO 81657 License: APPUCANT SUFE& RODNEY E. & ELIZABETILI?4IZ0O3 Phone:475-2421Chris 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL CO Rslifer@slifer.net 81657 License: ProjectAddress: 193 GORE CREEK DRVAIL l-ocation: GORE CREEK PLAZA BUILDING Legal Description: Lot: Block 58 Subdivision: Vail Village Filing 1 Parcel Number: 210108213002 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Mo6on By: Actaon! SIAFFAPR Second By: Vote: Date of Apprcvah 1210312003 C,ondiUons: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLCN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Planner: Elisabeth Eckel DRB Fee Paid: $2O.OO **'i*'l't'l'l'3******'|!** ** *****+ * ***t* * * *+ **t+*f:*'}i******** * * * *t ********+*++++ {.'t't * * *'S * **** * *** ** * * TOWNOFVAIL, COLORADO Copy Reprinted on 11-2zl-2003 at 08:52:29 lll24/2003 Statement ,t 'f ** * * * * 'l ** * *,*'i * l* * * * r. * * * * * ** * * + * * * * * ****** * * ++** * ** *'*** * * *** * * +**,|.* ** * * * ****t* * * *+*:i'N3tt **** Statement, NrJriber : R030005186 Amount: i2o .ooLL/ 24 /z'O3oa 2s2 AI{ Palment Method: DF Cash Init : NoEatsion: Permit No:DRB030525 TI|I)e: DRB - Chg to Appr Plans Parce1 No : 210108213002 site Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR \IAIII Location: GORE CREEK PIJAZA BUIIJDING Total Fees: $20.00 This Paymentr $20.00Tota1 AIJIJ Pmts: $20.00 Balance: $0.00 * ** ***+* + *r*+ * *** +*:* * * *! * ** +.*:l* * * * * * * * ****t*++ ++++ + **+ +** ****** * * *** + + * +t * ** *'t * * ** **** **++ +* * + ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Descri Dti on Current Pmts DR 00100003112200 REVIEW FEES 20.00 DES I GN ') ,lf t dM {V ,l' 1 ,-#'':#ffi'"- Gsneral lnformation: All prcjects requiring design review must receive appro\ral prior to submitting a building permit application. Plece refer to the submittal requirements for the particuhr approval that is requested. An application for Des€n Revial cannot be accepted until all required infomation is received by the Community D€r€lopnEnt Department. The pmlect may also need to be reviewed by the Town Courrcil and/or the Planning and Erwironmental Cornmission. Derign review approval lapses unless a building pormit is issued and construstion commence3 within one year of the approval. Description of the Request: Location of the Proposal: t-ot: A at(fd(: f;Q Atbdivision: physicaf Address: 14{ e^og C|+EU-Po'fet y'hVv ((t dll$A Parcel No. : ^tA to,?,t, PU (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: (nt4t4?4("t^L /A?/ 7 Name(s) of Owner(s): Mailing Address: Owner(s) Signature(s): { Name of Applicant; E-mail Address: Type of Review and Fee:. Signs 1-tza Conceptual Review New Construction' Addition Minor Alteration (multi-family/commercial) Minor Alteration (singl+'family/dupler) $50 Plus $1.00 p€r squaG foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. S300 For an addition where squate footag€ b added to any residenfal or commercid buiHing (inctudes 250 additions & intetior conveFiorF). $250 For minor changos to buildings and site improvemenE sudl .ls' rerofing, painting, winctow additiors, bndscaping, fences and retaining lrralb, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenE, sttcfi c' rermfing, painting, wirdot additions, lanGcaping, ferrces and Mailing Address: -.,--\ retaining walb, etc. Char€es to Approt/ed Pblns / $n /) F6 rwisiors to plars already appto/ed by Planning Staff or the t1----'' D€sign R€t iew Board. Fage 1 of 12106123103 ot - LocnrpN oF NEw SPIRAL sTAtRcAsE - STAIRWELL RAIUNG TO AAATCH EXISTING DECK RAIUNG. - 60" sPtRAL srAtRcAsE PER uBc coDE. Dec< - 9rrenl 9rerecege ApprpH Gom Cneer Plqzl 193 coRE CREEK DRvE, l.,or A, BLocr 5-8, VrL VrLnce Fruro l, PrnceL O*1X|qp?Hg0gAt lt \7,1n(rc F^4v)t ,t, il KY Slifert Designgor. 9TAFr: ',VAL \ Stair Design Information Page 1 of4 Counter Clock Sxm$r ffi*m*r-* $r;f'e*. Clockwise ;ii Layout: Locate the exact number of steps by using your elevation and refer to the Table of Riser's chart below. Standard degree is 27 .If you have a code or special requirement, determine which chart will be used. Check the number of steps and degree oftum your stair will have. Rotate the diagram four different directions to determine which direction best meets your needs. You can have less of a turn by decreasing the number of steps. Framing Dimensions: http ://www. stairwaysinc.com/desien.htm Framins Dimensions are used when stair 1t/21t03 Stair Design Information Tread Detail: Page 2 of 4 ircle passes through flooring. Notice the opening is an "L" shape, not square. For maximum head room taper 45" joist #2 (shaded area). Ifyourjoist is 10" or over, order with one less step and this will increase head room. Table of Risers: Stair Elevation: http ://www.stairwaysinc.com,idesi gn.htm 27 degrees @ [---Fl"l'r-lN,'.b",JE;;;;l | 'ii[T, ll "*' ll ct"t' I@EE@EW I f rnrsn I I Floor II Heieht IE;;l t-96-itlI r04" I 30Tegrees lNumber of I Stepst' Ii- E"""L:lr; I T,- f lnrsh Floor Height Number ol Steps E*,=. "i I circle Irnn[;-l[,;l,o ll ll I--T?"-to _-]f---l;---ll- *--]ro4" ll '' ll "" I t05" to 112"L jif -lL'L;'rlf -lLr--l[{FlrsqrilFi4 | 10s" to I| 1r4" I tll-s"jol| 123" I I rt t;-t- Et-113" to 120"HEEEEEEEEruEEEEEEEEEtTE@E@EEEEEE l--iz4"jolI r33" I tr3-4"-jol| 142" I ft?-3TlI rs2" I [153-ao-lI 16r' I l--i67lo-l| 17r' I ti-Et-- |"EE taEIarEl6l"to I168" I 20 540 148" to 154" .ll 472 1t2 l'/ 2" to 180"18 540 rU2t/03 Stair Design Information Page 3 of4 $ltipp-ed fil Sne $ingJe Unif. t .\L*4 4u.r \.at:tlt4b' r*.a rli;6'l4 ?J trj i. 4\i*. {r;:rt t-trt5 ftA rl, n'4(! * ?i"'€!il t"r!r err.rt {;i rl{r:-'il ! t{rtr t:r$ * *,rl}a.!l*t .,- 4 I t{ lri ti,: .:,#}- Nl,.-1*?d+'l - !_ Frl ,.. ,{}f l 1:strrF: & | n($dffi Lalrr9&r.r{!t ct4ta-laiI I rltgii a t , : f|5{ q.'!lg :tiq.-n*- P,(UI !r n -- 'i{ * Dimension D does not include the overlapping step above. Dimension Chart: 1t4" ll8-3i8" Specifications: Fumish spiral stairway as manufactured by Stairways Inc., 4166 Pinemont Houston, Texas 77018 (l-800-231-0793). Stairway shall be shipped in a complete single unit. Experience: Structural Performance: 725 76S 72"76" 6-5/8" l0- 1/8'tu- 1t/16"12-l/2"l4-1il6"t4- 13/16', t2-t/8'1Ah 14- 15/16" Fr-- lt3/16 l7-3/4" l3:Ti*-'r---.]t"'" I f,r .r-t----------_l t-l ri-i---------- 1t,,-l 113i16', I E-ridl W^"l http :iiwww. stairwaysinc. com/desi gn.htm 11t21/03 Stair Design Information Page 4 of4 Three Generations of experience allows Stairways, Inc. spiral stairs to meet reliability and on-time delivery of an any job specificatons. It is the outstanding product. customer's complete responsibility to notifu us ofbuilding codes or specia requirements. Codes: National Building Codes (BOCA) or Uniform Coatings & Suface: building code requires a minimum of a 60" Standard primer, zinc-chromated diameter spiral with 30 degree treads and a 4" on reddish brown rust inhibitor, black center maxium spacing for balusters. Before acrylic enamel , epoxies, or hot ordering, check with your local building dipped galvaniztion applied over inspector for code requirements in your chemically cleaned surfacers. application' Materials & Finishes: Code Acceptabitity:Stairways are made from a variety o We will design and manufacture stairs to meet materials: Steel, Aluminum, Stainles any job specifications. It is the customer's Steel, Brass, Bronze, Oak, Pine, complete responsibility to notify us of building Walnut, Teak and Cherry. Availaabl codes or special requirements. Finishes include: Mill, Polished, Sat or Coated. Introducfion I Uses I Wood I Parts I Design I Kit I Quote I Brochure I Home info@stairwaysinc.com o http :iiwww. stairwaysinc. com/design.htm tt/21/03 srif-,1i TRANSMITTAL To: Warren Campbell r: 970.926.8200 .x:970.569 3221 o web: sliferdesigns.com Date:November 19. 2003 2!6 MainSteet o SuiteC-100 . Edwsrds, Colorado 816i? Firm: Town of Vail- Planner Proiect Name:Slifer Remodel Dept. of Community Development Proiect No.:8149 File No.r We are sending the below listed items via:For youn nus,vtait [rlraail novernight ffiother by Hand ! Review X Approval ! Information Please reply by: L-JIAX Quantity Fax No.: Paqe<' Date (including transmittal) Description 1 package November 1 9 2003 Application for Spiral Stairway @ Core Creek Plaza INC: Application Form, $20 fee, Photo of existing, Drawings of Proposed Stair, plan-elevations. Remarks: Warren, Thank you for the advisory telephone call today. Attached with the $20fee is an application for approval of the circular stair proposed to connect the decks on Unit Sindlbe Pe_a!hg$Bb,oy9. at the Core Creek P|azaBui|ding'Theenc|ose@NovemDertU,wn|cnsnowsthecomp|etednew deck and railings previously approved. lf you look closely you can see the existing spiral stairway on a lower floor and to the eastern side of the building. lt is the intent to match the existing iron work colors and style. I will be oqtro{ town until next week/ however if you have any questions about the submittal please cal I Alyson Vassad at\Q26-8200-x3046. Beth Slifer Bv: Thomas E. Counter AIA Doa!nEnf2 If this mateial hlzs been faxed and all pages are not receiued, please call 970.926.8200, i UNIT 3 OECK EELOIA A RUN OF A ?/4" 19 PR,O\/IDED AT A POINT I2'' FROM htHERE THE TREAD 19 THE NARRONEgT PER UEC CODE. TOTAL RIgE II5.5' 14 TREAPg @ O,2'" RlgE NON-5KID PAINT ON gTEEL 5'O" SPIRAL 9TAIR6A9E PERUEC COOE 9TAIR9 9TAIR,CAgE RAILINe 10 UAT.-iH EXl9TlNCz PECK RAlLlN6, BLACK PAINT TO MATCH EXIgTIN@ Dt D b DDD 4 D DD D " I or Db rau D 6 D D DA DA NEN gTEEL LANPIN6 1^|/ NON.gKID PAINT STAMPED OONCRETE voH5 lltz 6D t DA D Do! t D NEt4 DECK A D A .D Dt h b AD tD 4DD D PD 6 tDB d onD ---; D oDaL-D>_-D.______}-__J D"t D b >ADP DP DAoaDt o*]-,*^, bp"['DD^ D DD D6 >A 6 D \D o A D t - ." \a DEOK PLAN .' 5"IRAL gTAIR ADDITION :gmLrtlncrlfrrrllr-IITII II I ltr ru.t On lraor ru clFt$brFr ||crrfltrr II Trla -l I SLIFER ELEVATION A 1 1 Jtu A Op Ef Mdv)ruiIL J rt) l- , :gEtarn IT I I E ottuatbb ll TIIf -l I 3LIFFR ELEVATI'N A 1.2 b _l \$ FI a IUI It 9rAtR6A9e RAILIN@ TO !-1ATCH EXISTINE DE6K RAILIN6 I SIDE 9TAIRI^{ELL ELEVATION Jtu A Op:3tu0u$ ffi+IL J ls) TPENTHOUgE)4TH FLOOR 3RD FLOOR (UNIT 3) FRONT 9TAIRI^{ELL ELEVATION , rqtrf,IIIITTNTTII.IT;TIIIIT IT I T n J ru A Op>3lu6 M$ M -,-rui tLJ rf) II n II sIII gLIFER ELEVATI'N A 1.3 V'*Wllq"-fi | l"f 5D t ccti*tlt{lY lGlELm/€t{t Design Rev:iew Board ACTIOTT FORM D€partilent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 8r.657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax:970.,t79.2452 web: www.vailgov.rom Project Name: GORE CREEK pLAZA CHANGE Project Description: Participants: OWNER DRBNumber: DR8060212 Location: Extension of Slifer deck to west, not to expand outside of building footprint, therefore no additional site coverage. Railings will match existing. Change in fenestration on elevator tower to delete windows on two levels of south elevation and add SLIFER, RODNEY E. & EUZABET06IOS/2006 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL co 81657 APPUCANT GORE CREEK pt-AZA CONDOS 06/05/2006 Project Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR Lcaal Description: Parcel Number: Comments: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Loh 58 Block 5 Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE 1ST 2101{82-1300-3 new railings shall match existing deck Motion Byl Second By: Vote: Conditions: BOARD/STAFF ACIION Action: APPROVED Date of Approval: 06/08/2006 @nd:8 (PI-AN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approvbl, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligendy pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0008131 Applicant shall insure that railings on new portions of extended deck match those on existing eastern portion of deck. Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2128 tax: 970.479.2452 web: www.railgov.com General Information: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the pafticular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and cons'truction commences within one year of the approval. Minor Exterior Alterations Application for Design Review ,ftL-#,"41*"1Description of Location of Physical Address: Parcel No.i Name(s) of owner(s): Mailing Address; Owner(s) Signature(s): 6 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8540 for parcel no.) v -luw 3- o fu -tP ,lJ Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: E-mail Address:"<1, h ,. Q .t, fev, -el Type of Review and Fee: tr. Signs E Concepfual Review O New Constuctiontr Addition 5 Minor Alteration (mulU-family/commercial) D Minor Alterdtion lsi ngle-fa mi lylduplex) .t J [/ cnanges to Approved Plans tr Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For consfuction of a new building or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and rebining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, re-roofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Sbff or the Design Reviar Board. No Fee CLZC\ (6..trr> t**tf********f********+**+*************i+****'r'******+****************t++*+*f************+**** TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement*l'ff***{.****t****'}**'*******tt********r}*****+********+l'*+++*************it*+*********,}*{r*,t**** stat.ement Nurnber: R050000742 Amount: $20.00 06/05/200609:55 AM Payment Method: CaEh Init: ,JS Notation: $/eOns CREsr PI,AZA COIIDOS Permit No: DR8050212 Tlt)e: DRB-Chg to Appr Pl.arsParcel No: 2101-082-i.300-3 Site Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: l_93 GORE CR"EEK DR Total Fees: 920.00This Payment: $20.00 Total ALL Pmts: $20.00Balance: 90.00************|f*+**'*********t+**************t*+************+++++++*************ir***i*fi+***** ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Accorrnt Code DescriDtion eurrent Pmts DR OO1OOOO3LL2?OO DESIGN REVIEW FBES 20.00 r- tri irit--lq.l H_\li i;iE:lLll rl b. il'-r\,rr. i flf ;Ail ll:t l|| . '; ,',,,A[_ ... 0b.wh_ re; ? $ {3' t N \ e v) i 0.aJo r rtr)u !'}r|o(|v||orD -w^ rrnu rsr 'trr/I1^ w^ l' ro1 lo rwa s xM ro |r]ulrc, r,\Eo )i''!) trcD f6 | fNtcTnS vzvld x]uf :luoD zllulv Rcz -uJ tro-- .9rrroovx)rD w!^DullLlgvn nv ',€sro brrtd {!M lo horltoJ ,^llo xllrf, lur .6 L DNlClrnS vzvtd )ilul luo3 6 Fzutlll 9H EU OFzu F =||t EOIJI F)o x9 PEio{s Efl 3F A _5 Flu F zo 6Il d !i c, 5{Azluoo !-[lu |' . tl |t t-E| :--.li. l !j--FT:Ij;j , : i"., :'i ' .t .' l' "',.. ,t,l.i.",',i,,l,,, i,,i ., ,,,i., :, 1 '"I ir ;$ INi<ld\.y'rfr lul\) alH st8 + tl IT tlr!rt t! lt rtrll IEiu rt ,16 Fls <F slilir ill' i ,".I f !i il 0zrr0 r urdl r99LC O(rVtClo "rv !|tn|l rs. ro/nt x9^ te tol lo rrvd r *(IrBt, ltoo nl DNlclrn€ \rz\fld )iluf tuoD t!l . Al'. A tuoo IL ug zo tr tuJtu Fo tu Aluoo ILo v_g, zo tr{ tuJlu F rf){lu H\il;o,tao , l)ltor! reLs o(rl|o1o .rv }n!f L llrfl,1!N sqrotr|orr|v'| slJ|l'lroNtutcrI|l0 DtD*Ot5| DNtO'iln8 YZVld )]luf ]do3 lilliil,ir I s!fti zo tr tuJtu TFlI lu '.19Ytd I r 6lr)r-fa I I IrE 2 t.t'tu l--r- ii3 -[u ilHolo + 'rr i! '"rAl- El 11"F I t--J TNI bilEl i€U \ ltiiitFd \ t:l'lFuJ \ r l,i =- \ u ::al*-* \ Ii;{---------------\= tl tl tl =llotl Fll{tl >ll tuilJll ur ll Ell:lll 1 sllr o -\"'a :5 .|.rvd,0r|N^loNourod SNtclrnS vz\fld )llul luoS:lll tililil -iirii fliiiii i; ru R J to pl3 sl$ + .lE 9lv :- l\.) T .lo :. tc{.-lo olv *1il I F",uq, l$ xl *1" l,colo irr'Q 9? tfuWtt"fe-b*It*<6 Design Review Board - J ' ACTTOI{ Ft}Rlrl Department of Communlty Development 75 South Frontage Road. Vail, Colorado 81657 t€l:970.{79.2139 fax:970.479.245e web: www.vai lgov.com Prorect l{ame: GORE CREEK RESIAUMNT Proiect Description: Prcject Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL T93 GORE CREEK DR DRB Number: DR8060015 Locatlon: Addition of retail and restaurant space; repaint of entire building in white vanilla (2017-70) and Shaker Beige (HCas); replacement of some windows with new Red Jeld-wen windows; re-paint of all other fenestration to match; addition of penthouse Participants: owNER SUFE& RODNEY E. & ELrZABET0tl23l206 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL co 816s7 ARCHITECT FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 0tl?3l200f. Phone: 970-476-5342 1650 EAST VAIL VALLEY DR, #C-1 VAIL co 81657 License: C000001402 APPUCANT GORE CREEK PLAZA CONDOS 01/2312006 Legal tlescription: Lot: 58 Block 5 Subdivision: VAIL WLLAGE 1ST Parcel Number: 2101-082-1300-3 Comments: BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Hanlon Seond By: Dunning Vote: 4-0-1 (FriElen recused) Conditlons: Action: APPROVED Date of Apprcvall. 0210112046 Cond: I (PI-AN): No dtanges to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond:0 (P|-AN): DRB approval does not constitute a permlt for building. Please consult with Town of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activiUes. Cond: 201 DRB appruval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit ls issued and aonstruction is commenced a ,,-#Application for Design Review Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 lax: 97O.479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General lnformation: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepied until all required information is received by the Community Development Department. The proiect may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design revlew apploval lapses unless a building permit ls issued and construction commences withln one year of the approval. Description of the Request: P T'or-J OF EYI.JIFJ(, EF sf A...J g.AF-]'f 1fiA4E.) I AND AbA ELE{ AToc. To T{e 60e-E C.PEE k- hlZA tsJrL.F-r tJ.c, ILaf blra\JAL F FpoF d$ ft!.rru{J!)sE FLpoe t FER.ACE ttl }'-CX, &ftT{€^-J oF uNrr ts, heT oF_ _LocationofthePropoial: Lot: 56 Bbck: 5 SubdiMsion: Physicaf Address: 113 G*e L*at Duu:" Parcef No.: ztologzl3Oo3 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessorat 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning:/t 1 Name(S) Of Owner(S): l2oAL 2..4r-Ef PL^ZA C..N p'r."r I Frrur.^ A69o<.t ATl aFJ Mailing Address: Name of Applicant: E-mail Address:rs I ifen O sl!{e",ue*Fax: 4 ?a 'dbs:a RECEIVED JAt{ I I 2U6 /Nu Vrr,t,rr'c Io Ftt-trtb o 7\Jwor 8 a\I Owner(s) Signatu re(s) : Type of Review and Fee: . Signs Conceptual Rwiew Minor Alteration (multi-family/com mercial) Mhor Alteration (single-family/duplex) Changm to Approved Plans Separation Request c<rr-'rA er r Bruc n€-e cE O 41 ao -Lr3{Z $50 EUs $1.00 per square fool of total sign area. No Fee I $250 For construction of a new building or demoirebuild. For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, hndscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board- No Fee $20 +**************++++++********++*****i*{.{.{.'t{'*************++**f+fttf**+++++***++++++++**++f*+* TOWNOFVAIL. COI,ORADO Statement*****r,l******+*******!t!ttt****!t++******,t ********{.t +************t*******'f********************:t+ Statement Number: R060000055 Anorjnt: $300.00 OL/23/200601 :09 pM Payment Method: Check PIERCE Init,: iIS Notation: 13 52 9 /FRITZLEN Permit No: DRB050015 l)4)e: DRB - Addition of GRFA Parcel No: 2101-082-1300-3 Sit,e AddreEs: 193 @RE CREEK DR VAIIJ Irocation: 193 C,ORE CREEK DR Total Fees:This Payment:$300.00 Total AIrIr Pmts : Bal"ance :**'**********++++++++++******++{t*!t**+***t********'}*****'*'}'}'}r!********************'******'i'***'}** $3 00 .00 $300.00 $0.00 Current Pmts 300.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code DR 00100003772200 Description DESIGN REVIEW FEES W5ruc1o __-_..__-^._^_^*-.*^-_+.rytuhM m#E 3F_#cffiF#_ aN#yflmtrH4_4x^eeN.aNae,.fu-tutre, ZxA Fta -----!---t ll*a_ptt<-tue €?,uGE ffi'tJhaulqe,a,. ZotT-fowindows9fwl&lgrla-zt wrwh EJ FTo atade-r hee -Sn rya (74,t nl tC:/<)***-+ p4 *ae u p7 eE "4 - bF 84d Wlndour Trim Doors futE @A Buildino Materials 'Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Door Trim Hand or Deck Rails Flues Flashing Chimneys Trash Endosures Greenhouses Retaining Walls Exterior Lighting Other PROPOSED MATERIAIS TYoe of Material Color ryrft4+ Ey/67/e ffiv,1n4w r4,b(E bl|-fr Flre F&tm:n*if,cEzN- -SLlArea- NA ffi* N/x flFrr+t- /F*rar)er-ag-e (Eyefl P/4 etz).-.oa 6hl/r+n" t tt MzzKE 2D4 -% rn ftT7*1 EX/a7: ilotes: Please specifiT the manufacturer's name, the color name and number and attach a color chip. gfrL&rc (3/+u ft-t|c4.) m41ztt Es.tl-/218r*r- t1 Dl-* gNE Ye4leA F:\cdev\FoRMs\Permits\Planning\DRB\drb_minor_alt_11-23-Z0o5.doc page 6 of t3 L!2312005 t\ PROPOSED I.ANDSCAPING Botanical Name Common Name Ouantih. Sifg PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS ftr*nut* DCSTING TREES"'--'@ *+#*t 2 TO BE REMOVED rn/*., Ft-a<r.@.i Minimum Requirements for Landscaping: Deciduous Trees - 2" Caliper Coniferous Trees - 6'in height Shrubs - 5 Gal. Tvpe Souare Footaqe GRouNDcovER rf ,eS--WNtFry---laP soD SEED IRRIGATION TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL P{ease specifo other landscape features (i.e. retaining walls, fences, swimming pools, etc.) <1z+t- €eL €#t- Qil F:\cdev\F0RMs\Permits\Planning\DR8\drb_neMv_conshuction_11-23-2005.doc Page 8 of 14 lla3lzlqs -1r* ll tl Ii Ilb - Re: Gore Creek Plaza 1 From: Todd OppenheimerTo: Elisabeth EckelDate: 0113112006 1 1:43:30 AMSubjec'h Re: Gore Creek Plaza Building Elisabeth, To help the architect resolve the floor elevation issue, we have agreed to raise the high point of the street at that location by 0.2 feet. (elevation 66.5 to 66.7) They can calculate the building FFE based on that elevalion for their submittal. I imagine you will see that noted with the building perm.it submittal. Todd >>> Elisabeth Eckel 1/31/2006 11:15:11AM >>> Hi again, Todd: Was this issue resolved? As long as what all three entities have agreed to construct (in terms of FFE and cross slope) is reflected on the building permit set of plans, I have no issues with these types of changes. Thanks for keeping me in the loop, so to speak. Elisabeth Mnou' f6ee MAerr Hua.-r;aa1a i+ 54o,.rr-D HAee -T.ra-N ED 1n l.frrodt UTITITY APPROVAL & VERIFICATION verify seruice availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. Authorized Siqnature Comments Date QWEST 970.s13.7189 (tel) 970.384.0257(fax) 970.687.Q722 (cell) Contacts: Steve Waters swaters@owest.com EXCET HIGH PRESSURE GAS 97O.262.4076 (tel) 970.468.1401 (fax) Contact: Rich Sisneros HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC 970.947.5425 (teD 970.94s.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom ivroom@holvcross.com EXCEL ENERGY 970.262.4038 (fax) Contacts: Kit Bogart 97 0.262.4024 Katherine Bogeft EAGLE RTVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRTCT 970.476.7480 (teD 970.476.4089 (fax) Contact: Fred Haslee fhaslee@erwsd.oro COMCAST CABLE 970.46,8.2669 ext. r100 (tel) 97O.458.2672 (tax) Contact: Brad Dorcas bradely dorcas@cable.comcast.com ItoTES: I' If the ufllity approval & verification form has signatures from each of the utility companies. and no comments are made directly on the form, the Town will presume that there are no problems and the development can proceed. 2. If a utility company has concerns wlth the proposed construction, the utility representative shall note directly on the utility verificauon form that there is a problem which needs to be resolved. The issue should then be detailed in an attached letter to the Town of Vail. However, please keep in mind that it is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve identified problems. 3. These verifications do not relieve the contractor of the responslbility to obtain a Public Way Permit from the Department of Public Works at the Town of Vail. Utilitv locations must be obtained before diooing in any public right-of-way or easement within the Town of Vail. A buildino pemit is not a Public Wav permit and must be ob'tained separatelv. The Developer is required and agrees to submit any revised drawings to the utilities for re-approval & re-veriflcation if the submifted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date (unless otherwise specifically noted within the comment area of this form). Develope/s Slgnature F: \cdev\FORM 5\Permits\Pla nn ing\DRB\drb_neh'_constructjon_1 1-23-Z005.doc Date Page 9 of 14 lll23l2O0s l+ I-f a ililml*i*i; =E= E=t e.9 x? B6 \ :, ki t6 1il" i6d : 9F>. E 961 6ngi u P65 :gE EE 6-.8 E !i-H 32,8 ;:H F3g _.; E t-: 3 d." 3 ,6.xit /3\ E:=p \- i-8. \-/ 5 tre !:l i:: ! ii a! :.' =l I i i .:i; ;i i .:! ! ii ii .;r !r i..i ii ;! :.i ::i: ;;!:: :lrl -':: i;i: :il:: i::i ;; :r: ;:: i i'i;i!!r;il iii :;;l !!::: :: =l !! i:. i:i: ;i' :;; :lii ii' ;:i,:iiii!i:: r :;:ii.iI i::;i;ii:ili r:r: a, i .- i - .i !-t:j!: --:iii: !: i i:,,1 .t ;:r)i1i La \ ( ,'t J b 3 d =l rlB =12oltl r.l !t i, t: ; ritil ? :i- I t€;i!! :: !;!!: ! !: !.! ! t:: tn-: !iiiit!ii i'::iiii:. !!iii;iiii:irt: ! !,;: !i:"i -i:: ;i: i;i::;i:! :b ;!i l: ii;iiri:i ::9 li ,;i ;ii:i: :ii.r'iii:i:i::;i::!j: :::i:ii:li::!::::;:'i! :i:!t::i!liii:i;!:!;:rll _:-- aa: a E i a;'rtl7 iiiliii iiiiilil!r!rl; ;iii:ii iiiilii !;'t;;3 ;i i!;i: i i:ii:iiii.lai'.'ti liiiiiliriii!!: iil: i :i . ,, 1r r!: i !.-:i : ! :: r i! E :: :; :!.iZtr 2aF 6dr JX 3 ts: #$E = J,,,r.,1 aL -rt vS-qU -ul=t^(r> -G (J rr ;r: t'"[:;ili!irtzl:i! ti;i !r:5 fl;t !,l"-6 r!r! ttiI ; i!: ;!:i! z = L.lE.o(9 q; d, 2J -Z- :31Nal r:t Irlrlt !!; i! !i i litlr:l fliir i!t!i ,! !;; ; : i!!'ttl.t::!gl:1; l, 9dq" 3lr*t' .l rl;-l \ .1 Ils \ I 2a trqq "=533or #$aEdrEv5dw . FE; lrJ -5A(.' ul" * t.: ..,t* ,'|i-l iE- i! i r: 'd i i:i .;. -; {9 ; JIE il! :, ^8UI: aF. I \t !- 3i:z 3I ,t !t fi _!i ^l :1. t." 3li iits .,t 6r El3 "l ch 2aF6d.r J: 3 a,q #$a E d: E:<E6U , PH; Ha ,ti:" il;e :;iE :ll t:i ::riit il !!rt r! !,; liir :lrillii!l r! ! ir; ; i!;rili Ilr Ii llE ili;l aaI-Y : ---l- 4,. E "\II lt -9 !;E NV'ld :ll|S Etoil T0 I Jlv+ iT!rtt \} j ..ir [fI llig"'t: t Er[" .irsl ir{aj :,!IEE irts$ * I I it l-L $J i8 ri -? !F t_. i! {I I $ ; t,r 5,t Ld 6ll Il 1Fl! :i{ l { $ L daIo Pft n I i,\I P;l rg i'f ri r $ $l-? +.." l4i i .,:r il t- $ 1 totri t! .l '; tl6lEI -Jl r,1l-l EIurlal 9l I !l:+ ,l.__t-:l I@ dri I !\-lli u .a-'o iil I I 't '!l ,il iltr zr 1.1 o._9;!o 'i! li illr ib ;:irtlLI6+ I ag itIt Iffiffi iflLr-;11\ !! il, r! I lf- " Fx -t-1* i"t.6 63e: FIto-z 8a- */ | c_i 'l 1.rt rl ,dl tfu."'-'* iE*+ 3l EIzl HI jo) i6d' =' <: ! >i <: z; :: ,(0:to-1.) 00z6 =xe: b g-2 es pl EI 2! d-' E0Q5 cs il* d'lE :;t el3t i NV'Id HOO]J 0[N[0'][{'rE vzv]d }'i33u9 3Ho9 z d$ 6irqq -.! aL \. tsq jg {n Ii: iIt r' ItEi o tqtt{A'{l \$ l, - ii$ rl\ r St. l1f = !!i i.\) Xr . Ll t'" i uJ otuT (I, ". O ri rz Tl FilrdlL I i"d:l!: osoqE r- {iJF rl: $-;tn $9lI 5C li iLL}!0 !r o---- T! TEtL! |! ti tit Bl: EH IiE ol I,l .f-t :t t l-2,Ft tn-_\ ! lJ- t -::ir l ;::il56l: i'ldEl: i:ilQi: i;ll m zl],rJi \J Nd p-E6-DNlcl|nB YZYId ):lluf IUOS trtt -Jll.tl stlotl sll 6tl 3lllUtJIurl IlrFI; Mlli ell; €) llrll slol{l-lzl oll Fll <tl >tl tutlJllurl Eill Hlli @ zo tr tuJtu Fo{lu tr|lJtl Fll 3ll 6llil<l>llUlJIull' Fil;oll! ulli @ 0aze0I ur|()qd r!e!B ooworo, Tlrf r Bc )3ID lNOa 16l 3NtC]n8 YZV-td ):BUf IUOD (o . o:L?'oo:E U QV UOOC 't l- t ul+tx it--l i lr l:tllr i GRADE BRIAK +!(o (o 8000 ry @ t---+ v,,sor,o. r;[ i I l,Jl?iE-v <) r't I lrl ' f € (oj B1 or QN1-J (O : iii[#61 ii;iEllEl iirii ilit lril r59 Lr Oovrolof, ,rv g{ilr! r\L ryrhnv 'as lol to lal€ l]]$ ao' $ L DNrCl|ns \fz\fld )33Uf IUOD u,so.to"rd - iuu Iq BSdqSI r$FilF5f; Azf p o t r! itti d{I EI lnl lu d-o lulu v.\) tuuoo lI I l< li !: I I I----J !rr! t! iiiEuo ;iilei El i o:.50. rfrtou DNICIINL A IUoo tLtl ptl tLtl ztl{tlJtlLll Mll otl 9ll rLll atlzll..oil;oil! Hll; @ I \rzvtd )lluf rBoS ao"4?'oo'E u,'a,todl --- - ___1 g \9\>E t' E 6; r 5 E3,s r Adi,"a zq,(r-== {o{A<oX\ q*s tE*iig*$ F3Hfi[ $E g l.'l oz iilEIE3NrO1n8 VZVtd )ltuf IUOS ato'47'OOE - u,,so,ro.- It Alu Orr otlLtl otl utlLtl ztl <tlJI 0- ll utl otl otlJtlu_l* AIIilti.ltFil $ @ !t i'"G d --t l ItIoI l:l\t s l :iiiffi151 i iiil$illtlIill2DNlclnS Y7V1d )ltul ldoS v,sa-,ro.E Aluoo tLo uil tLtl zl <ilJtl rLll ull otl otlJtl rLll tulolflot.Tt!il. ru tiLl$ @ rlI €: .JIL O6 50[8,Ed(lsltloRfiri ?":$th B$iSfi Ffiri: rEtIs r<IbIt- I+ l'l -_t 0/r$,D]|old lNto ru!tr luo, {5 L 3NtCl|n8 VZ\.ld )]luf IUOS FETliii:milElE- \ lt iiiEE E.l Au lutlotl otl tLll otl Ellzloltrl{l>lrul_llulo Fllioili filli @ Anlull 8tltLl sil zloltrl<l>l 5lulo FLI ;oll{ lull s<l$ @ iiliHEl zl u..l \JItf,d a.g; 1',\rlo rn!f, Io .6,fNlcln8 wvld ):ltuf luofIt D lutl 8tl rLtl otl utltLl zl otl tr|t{ll itlJtl rxll illi srli @ ot E! 5i !5 IP 3r !.t iPYtf i\l$ o trFz IJJ{ )lL rI{ v.o sU o rd lo iq t"o.z IS FS a d q i\O Y]M ID is lai\ti2 srH I ta .16 9lv:l'J t- lrrr 1" :,'j:' . i-i-;:, , ;;i*:-'' ,//t: i.':,F'w,/;. ,$|: ..'. A =e"# o1r- ?D(to (v*t-a*- " ' "MI"tr"ZL!C-\t?- -'8ill - fi'rj n Core Creek Plaza - Facacle Prollosal I R /r f NPrfRCt ''a 4.4,a/-'a\ + --^: ' + :_, t __- ^OUTH ELEVAT I ON ["RO" OSED] 5 -Bl .d' 9l I l L t-*l tltllltltltl tu Ilz Ito IlJel | '-1 EltJtl l<: IllEirrltdE;xit lxHE9Ellut-:' Ite.zllu5 |lrr I I lralto Ill g ,o lI't! ,8 lri = I *: JiL- - -\- 4a"t1'Oo"n \ / l /*,/, lttlr,zr' ftc //h"('/ c'l ;fttf I l-- t"t//vt v " t ,1H o sEpl elll to<rr v s,rrl., t.' - t"o' NOTE TtE ROPOtu A99tlto|1 oF c*'E]RctAL *x-e FOR TIE SROUND FLOOR oF TIE zuu-Dll.{€ 19 AFFROXII{\TLY 1C'.{ 5O, FI (!16.UJDE5 34 *. F-t. "ORllJE ELEVATOru. 6ORE CREEK DRIVE .t C-e+ C*E)L fracf. Durr-bNtr -eee *llbtt.-rJ F+stra+frP 'J€"f'€,- +t YEz- Beturr Hc- 45 r NNbov.t btaiz Tcr-E'-t1t*r F?a,s - Sc^Arr-er HIZS- fig+trnr rP iJ*,eF- hrHra tJAr.rtu.a- %r7 -1o Application for Design Review Deparlment of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 lel: g7 0.47 9.2139 iax, 97 0.47 9.2452 web: www vailgov,com iOI{lN General Information: ^ a Afl projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit apphcalion. please adrefer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval thal is requesled. An application for Design Revrew L , cannot be accepted until all required informalion is received by the Community Development Department. The Vfproject may arso need to be reviewed by rhe rown **","^l,Jii'[THTll; ffi?"J#l#;,:?ilffi'",i'Jn: .YlDesign review approval lapses unless a building permit is issued and conslruction commences within Voneyearof lhe approval' .4 (- r..,*^ , . ^ r.--- -- --., f l-ar ;V(* r.-F . trl tt- fr7t, p4.6;:-f- *rt- Location of the Proposal: Lol 5fr _Block: _ Ft Sufdivision: VLr, il::l;:::"::"ru TffI,':t; ni vk"';-v11'l-4:pn: !'rt:'z'r'k: o Parcef No,: * I li i0f-l l"4f:$3 (Conract Eagte Co. Assqssor at nro-urr-ru* Cf zoning:.:..* - I :":.",.1:r.o**,r=r,&,r'. r...,,. ,, OMaltingAddress: t..- r' r" .: .- ' t... ..'. -.,4. f ,. " : :;,' ',. .T':i"5-^::'=--' >b/Li:'-i- phone: <l.Jr'. '.y',..t [n owner(s) sisnature(s): ,!214 { l4A . V,,. P,,":t"^l I , Name of Applicanl: 5or< Cr!ee,< P/- za_ C^cL n ,.rrun .A..sac. - A MaifinsAddress: ase R.,'+. S.-. t/a;l c-o trto,E7 !f! X $50 No Fee $650 $3oo $250 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area, For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild. For an addition where square lootage is added to any residential or oommercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions). For minor changes to buildings and site improvernents, such as, reroofing, painting, windonr addiiions, landscaping, fenc6 and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions lo plans already approved by Planning Staft or the Design Review Board. No Fee Minor Altsration (multi-family/com mercial) Minor Alteration (single-family/duplex) Changes to Approved Plans Separation Request TOlffN OF VAIL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW SUBM ITTAL REQU lREMENTS GENERAL INFORMATION The conceptual review is irrtended to give the applicant a basic understanding of the cornpatibility of the proposal with the Town's Design Cuidelines. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. Complete applications must be subrnitturd two (2)weeks prior to a scheduled DRB rneeting. I. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS . A conceptual site and landscape plan at a minimum scale of 1"=20' or larger; ' Corceptual archilectural elevations showing exterior materials and a description of the character of the proposed structure or slructures;. Completed DRB applicalion form.. Written approval from a mndominium association, landlord and joint owner(if applicable). II. PROCEDURE Upon receipt of an application for conceptual design review, the Department of Community Development shall review the submitted materials for general compliance with the appropriate requirements of the zoning mde. lf the proposal is in basic compliance wilh the zoning code requirements, the project shall be forwarded to the DRIB for conceptual review. lf the application is not generally in compliance with zoning code requirements, lhe application and submittal materials shall be returned to the applicant with a written explanation as to why the Community Development Department staff has found the project not to be in compliance with zoning code requiremenls. Once a complete application has been received, the DRts shall review the submitted conceptual review application and supporting material in order to determine whether or not the project generally complies with the design guidelines. The DRB does not vote on conceptual reviews. II I. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING REOUIREMENTS For new construction and additions, the applicant must stake and lape the project site to indicate property lines, proposed buildings and building comers. All trees to be removed must be taped. The applicant must ensure that staking done during the winter is not buried by snow. All site tapings and staking must be completed prior lo the day of the DRts meeting. The applicant, or their representative, shall be present at the Design Review Board Hearing. Applicants who fail to appe€tr before the Design Reviar Board on their scheduled meeting dat6 and who have not asked in adr,ance that discussion on their item be postponed, will have their items removed from the DRB agenda until such time as the item has been republished. Paee 2 of 3/04/01104 l, (print name)a joint owner of property located al (address/legal description ) provide thls letter as written approval of the plans dated which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Departrnent for the proposed improvements to be compleled at the address noted above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: I further undertand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of lhe review process lo ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. (Signature)(Date) Page 3 of3/04/01/04 WWt4-tst' /rf 56,tbtpf Proiect Name: S\ /EET BASIL SIGN DRB t{umber: DR8060174 Project Description: Copper sign with cutout lettering not to o(ceed six square feet Participantsr owNER SUFE& RODNEY E. & EUZABET05/18/2006 230 BRIDGE ST VAIL co 81657 AppucANT GORE CREEK PLAZA CONDOS 05/18/2005 ProjectAddress: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Locatlon: 193 GORE CREEK DR Legal Description: lot: 58 Block: 5 Subdivision: VAIL ULI-AGE 1ST Parel Number: 2101{82-1300-3 Commdnts: see file for ltg speofrcs BOARD/STAFF ACTION Motion By: Acfron: APPROVED Second By:Vote: DabofAppruyal:06/06/2006 Conditions: Cond:8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 dap following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permlt is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Cond: CON0008118 Total size of lettering shall not exceed slx square feet Cond: CON0008119 Fluorescent lighting allowed only wtth lucite diffuser and box to control light emissions. Planner: DRB Fee Paid: $56.00 Sign Application for Design R E GE[v Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, C.olorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.48.2452 web: www,vailgo/.com hN \!! o \' U a-- I IY.vto 6- o (\Dvt Type of Rcview and Fee: A 5qns E ConceDtual Review D New @nstnrtiontr Addition E Minor AheEtion (multFfamily/commercial) E Minor Afteration (sin gle-family/d uplex) tr Changes to Approved Plans tr Separation Reque$ $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For con$ructlon of a nelv bullding or demo/rebuild. $300 For an addition where square fiootage is added to any r€sldential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions)' $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvemenB, such as, reroofing, painting, windovrt additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to htildings and dte improvements, sudl as, reroofing, painting, windorrv addition+ landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisions to plans akeady approved by Planning Staff or the Design Revle$/ Board. No Fee MAy ls 2006 General InformaUon: All projects requiring design review must re@ive approval prior to submltting a building permit apdication, Please refer to the ilbmittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested, An appllcation for Design Review cannot be a(ept€d unul all reguired information is received by the Community Development Depaftment, The proilct may also need to be radewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Csnmission. Design rwiew apgrwa! lapces unlece e buikling permit ls iicucd md o|Eilrufrn onrmcncla wiuin one year of tfre approval. Descriptson of tocaUon of the Proposal: Physical Addrees: Parcd l{o.:(Contact Eagle Co, Assessor at 97G328-8640 for parcel no.) Zoning: f{ame(s) of Owner(s): ilailing Address: Phone: s) signature(s): Name of Applicant: Lot;_Block;- Subdivision : $Pa -oge3 ,.ffi STGN APPUCATION SUBMTTTAL REQUTREiTEI{TS General lrformation This application is for any sign that is locaEd within the To\/n of Vail. Specific requirements are available from the Department of Community Development, I. SUBI.IITTAI REQUIREIIIENTS s-A. Name of Business: St,Pet Eati l u' B. Building name and physical address; qarc OueL Plaz< lfi € 4d( C've/ 0r' , (e r / nC. Written approval ftom condominium association, landlord, and joint owne, if applicable, .- D. Type of sign (check all that apply): FFreestanding Sign QWallSign .$Hanging / Projecting Sign QDisplay Box trDaily Special Board FJoint Directory Sign trSubdivision Entrance Sign tr Building Identification tr Mural tr Window Sign tr Sign Program tr Gas Filled/Fiber Optic tr Temporary Sign tr Other Number of signs proposed: Sign message: indicating the proposed location of sign(s)): Materials and colors of sign (attach sample): Sign lighting plan:f o-*f I Indicate type, location and number offixtures.q Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area. o Attach a olt sheet for each proposed fixfure. Drawings showing how and where the sign or awning will attach to the building and hovrr the awning will be constructed The Administrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples and offrer materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to deGrmine whether a project will comply with Design Guidelines or if the intent of the proposal is not clearly indicated. Number of sisns e<isting; | (?lut I $c.Sign and lettering dimensions for each proposed sign (attdt a colored scaled schematic drawing @1/+" = L)'. Lengthof businessfrontage: 26' yn fatl Ge Lrc"L Dr. Height of sign(s) from grade: 5 t Sign Location (attach a site plan and an elevation drawing or a photograph clearly t/'E, L/' F. !- H' v.- L sJ. o @ K. L. $u F: \cde\,\FORMS\Permits\Planning\DRB\sign_appllcauon_12-05-2005.d0c Page 3 of 4 Lzl0Slzoos ,,.ffi IOINT PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER I, (print name)a joint owner of property located at (address/legnl description) provide this letter as written appnrval of the plans datd 3 - 6 ' OG which have @n submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address noted above, I understand that the proposed improrements include: bw a,9.er.l'e{. I furtter understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans orrer the course of the review proaess to ensure @mpliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations, eQt F : \cdev\FORt'lS\Permlts\Planning\DRB\si gn-application_12-0'2005.doc Pagezof4 lAOsl200s ***********!***+****{.:&*'i'li.*!t {.+trt******+*+ * + * * * * * * ****t* * *******!* *****************{.**'t't ***'r,}*'! TOWNOFVAIL. COLORADO Statenent*+++********'li't**************{.{'*{'{"t*******+****+{'+**+*t+****:f**********,t :t *{.{.x.****'t'f*t******** Statement Nunrber: R050000632 Amount: 956.00 OS/Le/200603:20 pM Payment Method: Check BASIIJ Init: ,JS Notation: 68727 /SWEET $s6. oo **********'l**'|****************************,***********++++*+*******t*****************,t,lt,i*'i*** ACCOIJNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current, Pmts Permit No: ParceL No: Site Address ; Location; This Payment: DR 00100003L!2200 sP 00100003124000 DRBo 5 0174 2101-082-r-300-3 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL 193 GORB CREEK DR TIT)e: DRB - S igrr Application Total Fees: Total AIJIr Pmts : Balance: 9s5. oo $s6. oo $0.00 DBSIGTiI REVIEW FEES S16I FEES 50.00 5.00 6LtEtlL995 AA"82 7878233065 RICHARD TREVETHICK FAGE AL E. L. TOTLESON DESIGN AND FABRICATION 327 FAX ro: V*tt- gaUM Fur# ?70 .17?.pe No. of pages + 6gr'u ELPaPvl - /kb ffitc m/lYnu Asru' qlE catltry&nav- ,rtt //A+f F4Qv6 le/aqLD H Ultfl/ld /,U ry(gA+*f ,Mttttourrt aA@ 70 trfrlc4 g//ry^4 qfn?rrE /'#/4{d Affiffi) ac/H rt qffi4seF @rdW/aePAc &tlioD la#'o' lr rrr?s fu/lr rerrt atv{ rftl frw- 4/'/6ecils PZ rt'f eK a,e 6q4t$ B 7 u^Ji Puft4J ft{€ q,4{ q/rffiE; F 7E @ cnavlr 4r (fln{ ptrrr E A+U AM{ raT r#r ft/rc u(/Ar T Arf /f trtuV Q/6rq/s F+rysc&t1 ' 7wy5 An4 , U?4.ac/ct HH GORE CREEK H}AA BUILDINCiIEICTIlFcfsf rfl-tatlrfr:iraf,.oritnE 4g 3pvd xclHl:lt3ut olvucld ggSEEZELAL 966lltgtTa l-J F{ cn Fr tq Fl 3 $ $a * PAGE B3RICI{ARD TREVETHIO(ALlALl1995 69:tsS i$$f ;t;:ipt xI *?J g I s il Ecl {N I $ E N NI - Ft{ $[s 't ,J/. l It' t. 1_l \\l\i Nl ;\i i r\'t I:Ni; SI( NSit\il\: , \ \: 1l L-------lL*t4r/r&r E N l- l. ld fr -\-EltrErr(![ --JR!, -f-S3!-+ri'!lR I r'' :'.\-s -.as tt l! --\ Z : 5 r't-r\ w) ggA€EZALSL ZAiAB 96EI/TA/IAXCIHI.3ASJ. GTIVHCIUzg 39vd Department of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 970-479-2138 FAX 970-479-24s2 www.ci.vail.co.us June 6, 2006 Mr. Matt Morgan Mr. Kevin Clare Sweet Basil Restaurant 193 East Gore Creek Drive. Suite #201 Vail, CO 81657 Fax 970.476.0137 E. L. Tolleson Design and Fabrication 3270 Atrium Point Colorado Springs, CO 80906 (eltolleson@vahoo.com) Re: Gore Creek Plaza Building/ Sweet Basil sign (DRB06-0174) Lot 58, Block SA/ailVillage 'ls'Filing Dear Sirs, Thank you for your patience and conformance with the regulations that relate to signage within the Town of Vail. I have staff approved the application for a new sign at the Sweet Basil Restaurant with two conditions: 1. The total size of the lettering cut out of the copper sign face shall not exceed six (6) square feet. 2. The proposed fluorescent lighting shall only be allowed with the installation of a Lucite light diffuser and a box to control any fluorescent emlsslons. I have attached the approval form for your records. Please let me know if ypu have any remaining questions or concerns. Meanwhile, best of luck during construction! ./' .! --',//'Best.rt I \*".' EckelReed 970.479.24il enclosure {g "ot"uor r", 1 Va'zfi/tnfofl,ry /' 6rvt(2vt*'P/az* Design Review Board lrtA, bto/#68 ACTION FORM Department of Community Development 75 Sorrth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452 web: www.ci,vail.co,us Prciect Name: S.IIFER RES. EOT.TIIB DRB l{umber: DRB050075 Project Description: ADDMON OF A NEW HOTTUB ON AN DCSTTNG DECK ON THE 4TH FLOOR. DECK RAIUNG HIDES THE TUB FROM VIEW. Participants: OWNER I.ADY BELLE PARTNERSHIP LLLP 03/11/2005 Phone; PO BOX 85 EAGLE co 81631 License: APPUCANT MAXIMUM COMFORT POOL & SPA, 03/11/2005 Phone: 970-949-6339 P O Box 2670 Vail co 81658 License: CONTRACTOR MMIMUM COMFORT POOL & SP& 03/11i2005 Phone: P O Box 2670 Vail co 81658 License: 267-8 Project Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: @RE CREEK PLAZA, UNIT #4 Legal Descriptlon: Lot: A Block 58 Subdivision: Vail Village Filing 1 Parcel Number: 210108213004 Comments: SEE CONDmONS BOARD/STAFF ACTION Moton By: Action: STAFFAPR Second By:Vote! DabofApprovaat 03129/2005 Gondldons: Cond: 8 (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the wrltten consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate review committee(s). Cond: 0 (PLAN): DRB approval does not constitute a permit for building. Please consult with Tourn of Vail Building personnel prior to construction activities. @ndr 201 1 'tt DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days followlng the date of approval. Cond:202 Apprwal of this prolect shall hp and become roid one (1) year follodng Ure daE of ffnal apprwal, unless a building permlt is issued and onstrrction is ommenced and is dlllgentf pursued toward comple$on. Planner: Wanen Gmpbell DRB Fee Paid: f25O.0O e70e/rrrn r'l, ZvVl lV,ZTnlvlCOMFoLlttr\ olYlI In f nhlYlr lvll l\E 1o:lo:s3e,m, 'tu'-:-:-/.)2oof r' l/ I zll fl pr0lsF. q.q,frt! dtrlcn rarEw muEt.r€c{ve +Fq!l &| b dnmrung s buldrng pimil Tpt.lilon. Flgls rbf€, rothr Eubnnul niqurrem.ns rbr ft€ p€rudrh {piivd dr h rrqurbd -Ar sp||Erld 6Iicg.'R"rirGfi;i;acBgled,untilollnqfisdlrfomrdonE,ffi*rtdhficomrmunhoaelopntsrt'otpanm€ni. irt"protecntrysbonaed f"f.HLdrill".H|g1s-rylgr1f errit,q r,,o Ewrnnnr;di-6r,ii,irra;: 'ffin'il"l; .tpd"., ,ri; Applicatlon for Design Review _ _ _Dr0ertnr* 4 Qfi m|nlty OertEbr'lrft 75s0.rh Froit tp tH, Vat. frr3do 016ttb[ 9704i€21t9 fu: 9?0fig245il nrbi tt ww'vallgovsm Cfi.rd Iniorneticn; unhcr r bulldtq prrmrt rr r*urd anJcor*nrsiro-ni;riffi;i"rdtftilJ; ffi;'ilfi; lot| otthi Roau|tt:6) W*a' l-ocadon of lhc Propc|Nl: FhyrlcnlAdt$r*; ?*E l HHz'l ffizlfuY- (Contacr Ea# co. Ameesor ar 9?0€28{640 for perer m.l lonlngr lann(r) of Owrct(il:e 'a/.Ys<,;f f,allingAddn*:Q57 uf,{ Ematt AdrlrrtE: #s4) ILP TyFo of Reviru and Fre: ' Slgnr ' conaaDtnl R!\rlory . !fa* Omrtucdon. Adfiion t50 No Fge ten $m ffi] t20 No Foe Fhr$l,O pu rqrnrt 6otof btrlsign a|tt, Fr roGrtncdoo ot I naw hltdhs d d0|not|lhild.hr an flddl[on nrhrrrr qu!|E- fuoEg! b d*d to my fEddlntal orwnm|d|l hldlrg findrrdr 260 rulto'r e hbrio. onvr#tmifr mhtr dr gge b hjdtBr ild EftE fnprovsmnb, 6udr E,l€lfiing, pahln$ udndou atftfitirE, randscaphg. hncs ild l€tsinhgydfA€b, For rnlnor drangrn b hdHlngE ild rlt€ lfiprot s|nEnb, iudl as,*Tpnrtg, Flnlhg, wlndonr adclitions. lrnrhraplng, lbncs and .€talrdngmh,Gtg l".*!"|tE^io ptant atrsady +prsved by pbnr,i,,O Sirf or he De[n Rs,lsw Eoaid, . ilhorAlbrdoil (*rgl+hm0y/duptrx) . ClrH.rgE loApprovld Fhns . ScponUm Rr1id I Slgnsiuro(r,: ffiffiH.5**"ort 'rerd*\ A.+r{- hlr(f Mlt? :i .:r, j TOu.v;uivr.DEV.DtTlosao?J- **+++++**+************++****+***'}*+l+f+*f+++**+**+*************t********l*************{t***** TOWNOFVAIL, COIORADO Statemenr 'l't*******:t*+*++++++********l*,1+***t************++****t*'t*+f**+******+****************+****** Statement Nudber: R050000209 AmouDt: 9250.00 03/tt/ZOO5O8:45 Alil Palment Method: Ctreck Init: ,JS Notatsi-on: #35597/I[AU(IMI'M COMFORT P@I, ATiID SPA Permit No: DRBO50075 Tytrle: DRB-Minor Alt, Conn/Mu1tiParcel No: 210108213004 Site Address: 193 GoRE CREEK DR VAILLocation: GORE CREEK PI,AZA, I'NIT #4 Total Fees: $250.00This Payment: $250.00 Total ALL Pmts: S250.00 Ba.lance:$o. oo ++ + +****{.{.'t*********{.'N.*************'*'***f f f *t**+++*++++* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***1. ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Current Pmta DR OO1OOOO3LL2?OO DESIGN RBVIEW FEES 250.00 KRM CONSULTAI{TS, INC. P.O. Box 4572 Vail, Colorado 81658 (970) 949-9391 FAX (970) 949-t577 .r. €LtFEh. DEL? #out-tl o*.,*. I tlcarcriteroev--13-BM- D rE 3/1 / 05 ct{EctGD 8v 2t rl -l-t , Inz 71 = I-o E?rr t 1, L;. .": i.,/ VANGUARD*SPA - 5ZA JECfuTAO The Vanguard, winner of a Consr,uners Digest Best Buy award, is an extremely energy efficient spa. It features rwo seats with a Moto-Massage jet and Quanet" jet system to soothe your neck, shoulders and back Its comfortable seating, sryled armrests, ancl \W'ellSpring water fi:ature provide maximum rclerxation. Searing Capaciry Dimensions water C,apaciry Veight Spa Shell & Everwoodo Cabinet Pearl Jade or Spa Blue Vhite Endurol' Light Pearl Jade or Spa Blue White Endurol' Music Option Jes (Total jets-31) Vater Feature Control System Hcater Jet Pump Circulation Pump 6 adults 7'J" x t-'1" x 36"H12.20n x 2.20m x.9lmH 400 gallons/1,5 l4 Litres 789 lbs./J58 kg drv; 5,039 lbs./2,286 kg fillcd' Coasral Cray or Redwood Coastal Gray or Redwood Redrvood llxtra large LED rvifi a 5-posirion dimmer control Luminescence' 6-color sysrem Bh.re Luminescence' 6-color sysrem SpAudioo - rcady 2 Moro-M:ss4;e' Jets. 2 Soothing Scvcn"'Jers. 2 JetStre:rmt Jcts, 2 Roury Hldromassage Jcrs, 1 Direcrional Hldromassagc Jcr, 22 Precisiooo Jets V'ellSpring'" (cxcepl Endurol") IQ 2020'" 230v/50 amp, 60 I lz Includes G.F.C.I. protccted subpanel No !'aulr", 6000rv/2-30v V/avetDastern' 9000; 2.5 HP Coltinuous Dury, 4.8 HP B rcakdown 'l brque SilenrFlo 5000i' Effectivc Filtration Area 120 sq. ft., top loading, I 00-06 no-b;-pass filtrar ion Vinyl Cover 3.5" ro 2.5 tapered, 2 lb. density foam core * lncludes water and 6 adulrs rvcighing 175 lbs. each Also available in 230r', 50 Hz, I i0(hv Hcarer -29- SOVEREIGN-SPA p,u"EE INTRGY TFTICIENT MODTI i \"* Seating Capacin' I)irnensions Y/atcr Capacity Vcight Spr Shell & Everwood" Cabilet l)earl Jade or Spa Blue \r(/hite Endurol' I-ight Pcarl Jade or Spa Blue \&trite tndurol Jcts (Total jets-13) Vhter Featrrre Control Sr'stem Pcarl, ladc or Spe Blue Vtrite l-ldurol' Hcater & Jet Pump I)earl, Jadc or Spa Blue Vhitc Endurol Circulation l)ump Efl-eetivc Filtration Area ilqffi l#;, Roonl' cnough to trc:ir you and f-ir.e fiiends like royalrr,i thc contemporafy stvling of the Sovr-rcign makes a beautiful addirion to anvoncs casrle. Irs exrra- long lounge, expausive Barrier-Frec scaring, exrensive jct variery and \Y'ellSpring \\,'ater fiaturc dcliver a regal sPa cxPerience. :s sa ii arlult' 6B x 7'9 ' x 13"Hi 2,0Jm x 2.,J6m x .8,imH -l!5 g,ellonsi l .344 lirrcs 713 lbs.t32l kg dryr 4.(i0.t lbr.t2.{}liil l<g fillcd- Coastel Grar or Redrvood Co.rsrrl (lray or Redwood Redr\rrod Exrr,r l,rrge Ll-t) wiLh e 5-posirion dimme r corTtrol Lurnincsccncc' {t-color svsttur l]lr.rc LLrnrinescence 6 color systcm I N{oro-lr,llss.rge'"Jer, J Soorhing Sevcr' _lets. i JetStrcarr'.lcrs, 2 Rorery Hxlrom:r'srge Jetr.I Dirc'crional I lydrrrrnrsage lcts, 14 Prccision' lcrs \\tllSpring ' (cxi:epr lrndurol') lQ 2020 Jl{hi50:rmp, 6{) llz iinclrrdes G.F.O.l. protccrcd stthpancl ) IQ ,lt)-li)" I 15v/20 arnp (includes G.l'.(i.L prorecte.l porr.r iorJ (,r rao\lilr rnr|r (,U H/" No I.ruL'. 6000rvi 1.10r; Whvcnraster' 9000;2.5 HP Oonrinuous DLrt1, 4.8 HP Brcrkdorvn'lirrque No feLrh', 1500rv,/l l5r' or (r(l{l0rv/2-l{1"; Vhveur:rscer' 70001 L6i HP (lontinuorLs Dgtv, -3.i HI' B reak.lown 'l que Silentl:lo !0(X) 90 sq. fi.. rop loedinq, 1000i no-b,vpass tiltrarion .l.1 ro l.5 r.rpered.2l[r. densirv fbrnt core I a {$rl * u Pearl. Jade or Spa Blue I )0 stl h., top loading, 1001o no-bvp.rs' lLirrarion V'hite Endurol" Vinvl Cover ' Inciudcs rvrrer an.l (r rJrrlts weighine 175 ltrs. erclr-- (;.llc.l. pr,)rec.ed subp:urcl reqrrirtcl in f30v mode Also aveilul'Le in l.l0v. ,i() H/. I Sl)()rv r rcxrcr s rs)\l-,/ $Fo FIO sO;foito H H ff iF FF LD FT U Unit 3 & Penthouse Deck Remodel GORE CREEK PT,AZA BUII,DING, LOT A, BLOCK 5-B.. VAIL \ILLAGE, FINST FIUNG, V,AIL, COI,ORJIDO A JoINT VENTURE wITH September 14,2005 Mr. Charlie Davis Chief Builciing Officiai Town of Vail 75 So. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Dear Charlie: I would like to install a hot tub on the north-facing deck, third floor. We will be removing the hot tub that is on the north deck at the end of the hallway. The new tub would only be accessible from our residence, whereas the existing tub can be accessed by anyone who uses the stairs, either inside or out. It will be a much more secure situation. I will assume the responsibility for the structural integrity of the deck, which is pre- stressed concrete T's. Best regards, lktuk Rodney E. Slifdr RES/jt Vail ttilla* )ffice 2)0 Brilge Street . Vail Colorado 8t657 . Telepbone 97o 476 2421 . Faaimile970 476 2658. Toll Free B0O 544 2421 u'u' u.Va i I Rea I E s tate..on - A '+'-: rN .?o44Y O,-t,n"D,Ll^^ 1\-t-os blr*"bY Ylo"n'"''UJ c' *va il.@ ,/4IltlO\F€ D 6to'k-B Va^tWltT. /st' ,,-t) Design Review Board (ftr* OJ.?\i5"-- ACTION FORM Departrnent of Community Development 75 Sorth Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 97 0.47 9.2452 web: wwwd.vail,co,us Project l{ame: THE NORTH FACE SIGN DRB Number: DR8040622 Proiect Description: SIGN FOR NEW STORE Participants: OWNER IADY BELLE PARTNERSHIP LLLP T2I2OI2OO4 Phone: PO BOX 85 EAGLE co 81631 License: APPUCANTSPECIALTYSPORTS 12120/2004Phone:970-476-9457 492 E. UONSHEAD CR SUITE 101 VAIL co 81657 License: Project Address: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIL Location: 193 E. GORE CREEK DR Legal Description: Lot: Block B Subdivision: VAIL VILLAGE 1ST RUNG Paroel Number: 210108213006 Comments: seeconditions BOARD/STAFF ACTTON Motion By: Action: StrAFFAPR Second By:Vote: DateofApproval: 0V06/2005 Conditions: Cond: B (PLAN): No changes to these plans may be made without the written consent of Town of Vail staff and/or the appropriate rwiew committee(s). Cond; 201 DRB approval shall not become valid for 20 days following the date of approval. Cond:202 Approval of this project shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date of final approval, unless a building permit is issued and construction is commenced and is diligently pursued toward completion. Planner: Matt Gennett DRB Fee Paid: $55.76 IOI4il\,M Sign Application for Design R Departrnent of Community Development 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81557 teli 970.479.2139 fu: 97O -479.2452 web: www.vailgov.com General Infornration: All projects requiring design review must receive approval prior to submitting a building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested. An application for Design Review cannot be accepted until all required information is received by the Community Development Depadment. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town Council and/or the Planning and Environmental Commission. Design review approval lapses unless a building permit is.issued and construction commences within one year of the approval. Description of the Request:jtaU Fea Npt/ Srvz? RHCH$VED '"'6uc '/ o ?',r04 TOV-COM.DEV. Location ofthe Proposal: Lot:Subdivision: Physical Address: Parcet No.:'TlCtCBZlSoo 6 (Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.) zoningr C'AAE&A AL- 5 ?N-L Mailing Address: Phone: Owner(s) Signature(s): Name(s) of owner(s): EA, ,r.-. ,t \ i lirila fa (a Name of Applicant: Mailing Address: >?fEt E-mail Address: Type of Review and Fee; A signs E Conceptual Rwiew tr New ConstructionC Addition E Minor Alteration (multi-famity/commercial) tr Minor Alterauon (single-family/duplo() tr Changes to Approved Plans tr Separation Request $50 Plus $1.00 per square foot of total sign area. No Fee $650 For construction of a new building or demo/rebuild, $300 For an addition where square footage is added to any residential or commercial building (includes 250 additions & interior conversions), $250 For minor changes to buildings and site improvements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For minor changes to buildings and site improrements, such as, reroofing, painting, window additions, landscaping, fences and retaining walls, etc. $20 For revisigns to plans already approved by Planning Staff or the Design Review Board. No Fee description) JOINT PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN APPROVAL LETTER I, (print name)ZJv-,-) kJ^ ,os s. a joint owner of property located at (address/legal li provide this letter as written approval of the plans ft1g6 / ( / ?-- / oLl which have been submitted to the Town of Vail Community Development Department for the proposed improvements to be completed at the address noted above. I understand that the proposed improvements include: I further understand that minor modifications may be made to the plans over the course of the review process to ensure compliance with the Town's applicable codes and regulations. ll/l/zo/ol .(Signature) s (..*k Page2 of 4104/28/04 T0i4,Nm SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS General Informatipn This application is for any sign that is located within the Town of Vait. Speo'fic requlrements are available from the Department of Community Oerelopment. I, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. B. D. E. r. H, I. i. K. L. Nameof Business: Tl)'v N}rql WA Written appror'al from condominium arsociation, landlord, and Joint o,vner, if applicable, Type of sign (check all that apply): DFreestanding Sign qwall Sign XHanging / Projectinq Sign QDisplay Box ODaily Speclal Board flJoint Directory Sign r,lsubdivision Enbance Sgn l Number of signs proposed:-!-- Numb€r of signs efsdrq:o Buifding name and physicaf uaar.tt lot3 €. @Qr, CAI&L 9L tr Building Identification E Mural tr Window Sign tr Sign Program D Gas Filled/Fiber Optic E Temporary Sign tr Otfier sisnnessase: 'k(E lrffi Fy'&. Sign and letterl4g di.nensions for each prop.'- .6 rlnn (attach a colored scaled schematic drawing @ ,,"=n, 24i4 t/ Length of business frontage: Height of sign(s) from grade: ;:ilixT'31[:TTi;r{r:rii"*W&HfiThotoeraphdeartvindicatinsthe Materials and colors of sign (attach samples): Sign lighting plan: E Indicate type, location and number of flxtures. E Include height above grade, lumens output, luminous area. 0 Attach a cut sheet for each proposed fixture. Drawings shoh/ing how and where the sign or awning will attach to the building and how the awning will be constructed. The Admlnistrator and/or DRB may require the submission of additional plans, drawings, specifications, samples and other materials (including a model) if deemed necessary to determine whether a prolect will comply with Design Guidelines or if the intent of the proposal ls not clearly indicated. nave $aaand understand the above listed submittal requirementsl ProJect ]{ame: Contractor Signahjre Date Signed oo Vail North Face Store ,''Pf^P'FI#EJiH. r t / /- tr. IqwN oF VArL 2-sided Hanging Sign (4.15 s+f^t} 2" Thick Sanblasted and painted Redwood 24.45', ,1.'1.'***'1. * *'f '|'*++*****'t*****!r**:***'|******+++**+:*:*:t * ***,1,r * ** **,t*+*** 'tr **!r * * *,1* * * f,+ + * * *** {r * ** {. ****ri TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO Statement**+**'1.***************;1.r.****,rx.***!t**++*!t***{r******!t,}**+*+*+l*'t****:t :r{.*****+*******1.i.**.t **+*i.* Statement Number: R040002278 Amount: 954.00 L2/20/200402:50 pM Payment Method: Check hit: ,Js Notation: #2931IJOSEPH WA].,KER Permit No: DRB040622 Tlpe: DRB - Sign Application Parcel No: 210108213005 SiIE AddrEgS: 193 GORE CREEK DR VAIIJ LOCAI,iON: ]-93 E, GORE CREEK DR Total Fees: S54.00This Palment: 954.00 Total AIL pmts: 954.00 Balance: $0-00 {.*'tt**'1.**r{.***********lr**,N.*+**********************{'***,rr'}:r******'N***'t't *!i*:r*r.{r ***rt***{.d.**{.{.,**** ACCOIINT ITEM LIST: Account Code Description Cur.rent Pmts DR 00100003112200 DESIGN REVIEI'I FEES sP 00100003124000 siGN FEES 50. 00 4. 00 Project Name: Project Description: I Project Application t- 6'a Contact Person and Phone ! Owner, Address and Phone: Architect, Address and Phone: Legal Description: Lot Block ,o^" cLJ- Design Review Board Date DISAPPROVAL Su m mary: Town Plan ner E statt Approval ?d LoeDKY: gy qZ t ,l PUNNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 13, 1992 Present Greg Amsden Jeff Bowen Chuck Crist Dlana Donovan Kathy Langerrvalter Dalton Williams Absent Gena Whitten o cptlt copy Staff Kristan Pritr JillKammerer Shelly Mello Mike iiollica Tim Devlin Andy Knudtsen Mary Gaster The meeting was called to order at 1235 p.m. by Chairperson Diana Donovan. Worksession 1. A request for a work session for a minor subdivision and a zone district change from PrimaryiSecondary Residential to Low Density Multiple Family, for the Schmetsko property, generally located atz?F;g Chamonix Lane, more partiarlarty described as: Parcel A: A trad of land contiaining one acre, more or less, located in the Souh 112 ol he South East 1/4 of Section 11, Township 5 Soufr, Range 81 West of the Slxth Pdncipal Meddian, more partiallarly described as follorlvs: Beginning at the NE comer of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Sec{ion 11; thence westerly along tre northerty line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 bearing south 86 20' W a distance of 167.80 ft. to a point: Thence southerly along a line 167.80 ft. distant lrom and parallel to fre east line of said SW 1i4 of the SE 1/4, a distance of 200.00 ft. to a point: Thence easterly a distance of 167.80 ft. along a tine 200.00 ft. distant from and parallel to lhe north llne of said SW 1/4 of the SE 114 to a point on its east line; Thence easterly on a line parallel to the north line of tre SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 1 1, a distance of 50.95 ft to a point: Thence norherly and parallel with the west line of the east 1/2 of the SE Plrnn|m a,ld Emrtronnend Comnbdon M€dng . Juty iq tO92 \ o rntr copy 1/4 of said Sestion 11, a distance of 200.00 ft- to he point of intersection with the extension of the north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE'll4 of said Section 1 1: Thence westerly on a deflective angle left of 95 21'00' along tre extension of the north line of the SW 1/4 ol the SE 1/4 of said Section 11, a dislance of 50.95 ft. to the NE corner of tre SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 11, being the point of beginning. Parcel B: Tract A, Vail Heights Filing No. 1 according to the recorded ptat thereof. Applicant Erich SchmetskoPlanner: Andy Knudlsen Andy Knudlsen made fre staff presentation followed by the applicanfs presentation by Mark Donaldson and Bick Rosen. Mark Donaldson asked a question regarding the statement in he sbff memo stipulating hat the GRFA would have to be disuibuted evenly among all 7 units. Andy responded that once the acceptable number of units were determined, hat the Town would be interested in seeing that number of units with an appropriate amount of GRFA in each one. lt was not the desire of the Town to see LDMF densities of GRFA used on the site for only a few dwelling units. After some discussion of the employee housing unit issue, each of the Planning Commission members stated his or her position. Chuck Crist said that the requested density of 9 units was acceptable. Requiring an SDD to document all of the decisions would be nice, but not necessary if a ditferent document could be recorded that would be as eftuctive. Chuck wanted to know who would own the employee housing. Rick Rosen said trat ldeally they would be fres market units reslricted to purchasers who were employees. lf that altemative was not suitable to the Town, then a homeowners' association would rent he units. Kristan PdE told the Commission hat employee unit deed restrictions do not allow the sale of the units. Rick hen said that he may want to reconsider the two unit employee housing component of the proposal. What he had in mind when he suggested it was something like the Pid<in Creek situation. Mark Donaldson asked the Commission if the two employee units that had been proposed were a critical component of the request. The PEC responded that hey were. Chuck Crist continued with his comments and said that for sale units for employees would be acceptable to him. Hls last comment was that the view corridors from the property should be addressed wifr lhe site plan. Dalton Williams said that for sale employee housing uniB were acceptable to him. However, he would prefer that they be rented by the Condominium Association. Dalton had questions about the water channelization. Specifically, where would tre water go once it left the spillway of the debris basin and went down the driveway? Would it impact the Days Inn parking tot? Fhino ar1d EnvnD n$t8l Commbsbn M€eine . July 13. 1gt2 I tlrr copy Kathy Langenwalter said that the current site plan was a good design solution. Given this site plan, Kathy said he density of 9 unib was okay. However, in order to insure that this site plan would be consfucted in he future, requiring an sDD was imperative tor her lo support the rezoning rcquest she belleved th6 site plan could be improved by reducing the 2 to 1 slope, documenting how the annual cteaning of he basin would take place, and preserving fie 2 guest parking spaces. Greg Amsden had no problem wiur the 9 units and agreed with chuck cdst about he view conidors. Jeff Bowen was concemed about density, unless the request inch:ded an sDD component. with an sDD, Jeff betieved that the density would be okay. Jeff was parlicularly concemed about page 4 of the Arthur Mears report. He wanted b know who will be responsible for the annual cleaning of the debris basin. Mark Donaldson responded to this comment ard said the homeovners' association would take the responsibility. Diana specificalty had questions about the site coverage. She requested ihe applicants show all of he area which would be site coverage as fie cunent plans only retlected the lirst floor. In general the Commission believed that he site plan was a good solution for provirling a debris flow basin without impacting lhe adjoining properties too much. They all agreed that this site plan should be documented in conjunction with the rezoning so that a future developer would have to comply with its standards. Hourever, they dld not necessarily want to require an SDD if documentation requiring fris particular site plan to be consfucted in the future could be handled in a ditferent manner. A request for a work session for a conditional use permit, a minor alexlerior alteration and site coverage variance to allow for he expansion of an existing outdoor dining deck at Sweet Basil Restaurant. 193 Gore Creek Drive/Part of Lot A, Block 58, Vait Village First Filing. Applicant Kevin ClairPlanner: Shelly Mello Ned Gwathmey presented the proposal. There was general consensus that he location of the deck was acceptable as long as more planting was added to the plan. 3. A request for a minor exterior alteration to add an elevator to the Mill Greek Court building. A part of Lot I Block 5A, Vail Village 5th/ 302 Gore Creek Dr. Applicant: John lGemmer/Ann BromPlanner: Mike Mollica Mike presented th€ request to the Commission. The Commission requested that the size of evergreen and aspen trees, proposed to be located, be documented and felt that the elevator would not be a problem in this area. After some discussion a motion was made by Dalton Williams to approve the minor exterior alteration and Greg Amsden seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Phnnhg and E willnm€ntal Commlsslon Me.lng . Juty i3i tEE2 I o ffflt c0Py ,a 4, A request for a conditional use permit to allow a preschool at the Vail lnterfaih Chapel. 19 Vail Road/Tract J, Vait Viilage lst. Applicant: Benny Clark, Vice Pres., Vail Religious FoundatiorWail Baptist ChurchPlanner: Mike Mollica ...::... Mike reviewed he request wih he Gommission, stating hat fte concems tre stafr hart : in regard to this request were mainly wih the dropoft ueain tront of he churdr. Mko -:. stated lhat this area needed to be ldentified and the pavement stiped. Mika stabd .. that his reuqest was for a one-y€ar period only and here rvould be no exbrlor ,,, '. changes to the existing builditp. The question was raised as to a fence being ereded and Diana stated this request would be going to DRB. After some discussion, Chuck Crist made a motion to approve he condlffonal use permit per he stafl memo and Dalton Wlliams seconded he motion. A vots was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. 5. A notiftcalion of a staff approval for a minor amendment to SDD #pb, Days lnn, to allow for changes to the east and north elevatlons of the building at 2271 Norfi Frontage Road/Tract C, Collins-Wirth Subdivision. Applicant Jim Wilson/Peter JacobsPlanner: Shelly Mello The PEC had no problem with the minor arnendment 6. A request for a variance from the minimum lot size and a minor subdMsion br part of Lot 8 and Lot 9, Block G, Vail Das Schone 2nd Filing/ 2388 Garmisch Ddve. Applicant Jefl Hanson Planner: Shelly Mello These two items were reviewed by the Commission witr Shelly Mello. Shelly stated that he purpose of the request was to combine Lot I and 9, through the minor subdivision process and hat thers was a physicat hardship wanantlng tre approval. The stafi approval was based on he cribria in the staff memo. After further dlscussion a motion was made by Kathy Langenwalter to approve he variance as per fre stafi memo. Greg Amsden seconded the motion. t€thy Langernvalter moved to approve the minor subdivision and Jeff Bowen seconded the mo6on. The vote was unanimous, 6-0. 7, Appeal of staff interpretation of Section 18.58.300 - Seback fronl watercource of he Town of Vail Municipat Code. Appellan[ Bob Kandell Plannen Jill Kammerer The appllcant was not represenbd at the meeting. Jill presented the appeal to the Commission, stating that the definition of 'channel'was being disputed. lt was agreed that the measurement should lake place from the middle of the creek or river. Two letters were presented to the Commission in opposition of the appeal. After some PbnnlrB and Envlmfinmd CommEslon Msdno . Jrdy iq l$a 't It I rrttr c0PY 8. , discussion Jeff Bowen made a motion to support the staff interpretation and Dalton williams seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Jill presented the request to he Commission. A discussion followed regarding whd type of landscaping that should be required in front of the building facing Bridge Street. The original plan was to have an evergreen tree planted in he planter. The possibillty of planted pots that would be removed in he winter was dlscussed. A poll of tre Commission was tiaken and Ure general consensus was hat the original proposal should be implemented- lGthy Langenwalter stated that sincs she was not able to go on site visits she would abstain from commenting or voting. Ned Grafrmey, the architect on the project, asked frre Commission if fre itsm could be tabled at this Sme to he first meeting in August, so he could work with tre applicant in coming up with a suitable solution. Dalhn Williams made a motion to table this item and reschedule to the August 1 0, 1992 meeting. Jeff Bowen seconded the motion. A vote was taken and lhe motion passed 5-0, with Kathy Langenwalter abstaining. A discussion was held regarding the newspaper stands located in front of the Ore House. lt was suggested that Rod slifer contact fie Vail Daily and vajl Trait and ask them to remove the stands. Items 9, 10 and 1 t had been requested to be tabted untit the July 27 , 1 992, meeting. Kathy Landengwalter made a motion to table hese items and Dalton Wlliams seconded the motion. A vote was hken and he motion passed unanimousty, &0. L A request for a work session for an amendment to an approved development plan to allow the shifting of the building envelopes at The Vailey, Phase Vn700 Btock of Buffehr Creek Road. Applicant Ed Zneimer Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO JULV 27TTI PEC MEEnNG 10. A request for a variance to Section 18.58.320 to allow for satellite dhh antennas to be located at The Wren and Apollo Park Condominiums. Tract D, Vail Viilage sfl Filingl442 and 500 Frontage Road East. Applicant Wren and Apollo Condominium AssociationsPlanner: Tim Devlin Plmhg lrd Enyltonmdttrt Commbdon M.cnng . Jry f q lS2 TABLED TO JULY 27TH PEC MEENNG ' '-l I irr' ' 11. A request for setback varlances to allor he consbucdon of a deck at he lGndelt rosiidence.4259 Nugget Lane EasU Lot 2 Bighom Estates, RasuMtuision of Lob l0 and 11. Appllcant Bob Fbndetl Plannen JillKammerer TABLED TO JULY aTITIPEC MEENNG 12. Appolntrnent of PEC representative to Municipal Bultdlng Task Forcs. Jefi Bowen was appointed to the Municipal Building Task Force. 13. Approval of June 22,1992 meeting minutes. Jeff Boren made a conecdon to the mlnubs. A modon wtts mads by Chuck Cdst to approve the June 22 minutes as conectd. Dalton Williams seconded he molion. A vote was taken and the moton pass€d $0, l(attry Langemvalter abstaining. ft | ?lrr copy PbmL|g lrd Envltqlnr|d ConmF.br iLing ..lJty tq tstl 7 {| ""rrt""6 6/L8/eL DRB APPLICATTON - rOwN OE vArL, CotoRAf,$'O l{AR I 5l99U DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED : DATE OF DRB MEETING: *****t**** EIIIS APPI..ICATION ITII.L NOI BE IICCEPIED UNTIL AIIJ REQUIRED INBORIAIION IS SUBUIIIED *t*rtlttli ' PROJECT INFORMATION: A. DESCRIPTION: I. .+ wr at+^N@?=-wtl*. b*il UniL ova-lw) fu*r"va, B. ful TYPE OF REVIEW: Ne!,, constructlon (5200.00) b> X uitor Alteration (920.00) D. Addition ($50.00) -ConcepLual .Review ($0) ADDRES5 , 14+ @re- Qtz?- fuWe-, LEGAL DESCRIPTIoN: Lot - Btoc.k E2> Subdrvisio" Vil Vlt?'.z- Frrat Fitri#r If property is described by a meets and bounds legal o."liibtioir, please provlde on a separate sheet and attach to this aPPlication. E. ZONING:4cl LOT AREA: If requiredl aPPlicant stamped survey showing lot area. must Provide a current'F. tt. H. ffi"i;; T^iii.Z?i 'NAI',IE OF APPLICANT:Chs'}lc- Fc#A €pLjtdf -V.*t- -- thone i! NAME OF Mailing APPLICANT, S . P€PRESE\TAT IVE : I. NAME OF 42. >bllz iSIGNATURE (S) : Mailing Address: Phone J. Condominium Approval if applicable' K. DRB FEE: DRB fees, as shown above, are to be- paid at- the tine of subnittat of DRB application.- . Later, when ippfying for a building permit, pleasb identify the.- accurate .tainitiott or lrri proposll' Thg Town of Vail willadjustthefeeaccordingtothetablebelow'to ensure ihe correct fee is Paid'FEE PAID: S FEE SCHEDIJLE: V.{LUATION $ o - s 1o,0oo $ 10,001 - $ 5or 0oo $ 50,001 - $ '150,000 $150,001 - $ 500,000 $500,001 - $1r 000r 000 $ Over $1,000r 000 FEE $ 20.00 $ s0.00 $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 $500 .00 *NO APPLICATION TIILI. BE PROCESSED WITEOST OWNER,S SIGNAIURE - ]F MATERIALS I\ Ac4E @ P|-zaatx *)tug@_NAMn nF pRn.TF:CT. ,.:Zt +*F s'ffiE F ] rffi W avts-7 l-Ie) LEGAL DESCRTPTTON: LOT- er,OCX 5F SUBDTVTSTOW VV lsf 5TREET ADDRE55 ; 14> (ar<- Cva-eb- Ww<- DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:Exl*v b,r H," d-t4-:tl- FtaL The following information is Review Board before a final BUILDING MATERIALS: Roof Siding Other Wall Materials Fascia Soffits Windows Window Trim Doors Door Trim Hand or Deck RaiLs Flues . Flashings Chimneys Tnash Enclosures Greenhouses Other bo+b*Ezz EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED submittal to the Design be given:required for approval can .tl . (exie*) Utl0fl4dl \7re'v'el/ H1\l=l t r'lrlWg',J Evcal'tet7. Us+.-^r, , It., B.LANDSCAPING: Name of Desiqner: Pfione: PLANT MATERIALS: BoIanical Name PROPOSED TREES Bl. +",. cA'i " Tofa,tillt Fni+a,+ Common Nane Ouantitv Size* | (.' all -eelE or>l4 G' +' *Indicate caliper for decid.uous trees.deciduous trees is 2 inches. fndicatetrees . Minimum hei ohf for r.rrni .Fprnrrq TYPE OF MATERIAL ejv ot^' \nWood, Ev.*l",ol,ls Qs(CAtr ^' '\n = >au_ v Minimum caliper forheight for coniferous