Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC150002 VVMC West Wing Memo and Attachments0) TOWN OF VAIL' Memorandum TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 2015 SUBJECT: A request for final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2 (PEC150002, PEC150003) Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center, represented by Braun and Associates Planner: Warren Campbell SUMMARY The applicant, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), represented by Braun and Associates, is requesting a final review of an amendment to a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additions on the West Wing of the existing facility located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road. Upon review of the applicable elements of the Town's planning documents and adopted criteria for review, the Community Development Department is recommending the Planning and Environmental Commission approve, with conditions, the applicant's request for an amended conditional use permit to facilitate the redevelopment of the West Wing of the VVMC. A complete summary of Staff's review is provided in Section VI of this memorandum. II. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST As was discussed during the VVMC MP review the hospital needs to remain operational during all sequences of the hospital redevelopment. The proposed West Wing expansion will allow for uses to begin to reconfigure, expand, consolidate, and relocate in anticipation of the East Wing redevelopment. The West Wing is the first in a sequence of improvements that will be proposed and constructed in order to implement the recommendations of the Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP). As proposed the West Wing redevelopment will comprise approximately 45,000 sf feet of floor area. More than 50% of the new floor area will be include within the new fourth floor to the West Wing. In conjunction with the expansion the applicant has prepared a strategy to maximize parking spaces on site in an interim condition to address parking losses and needs prior to the completion of the East Wing. The applicant has provided a written narrative describing the request in detail and responding to the criteria for review. The narrative addresses the changes to each level of the hospital, parking generation and needs, employee housing generation and mitigation, architecture, and building bulk, mass, and setbacks. The applicant's written narrative entitled, Vail Valley Medical Center West Wing Conditional Use Permit dated revised March 18, 2015, has been attached for reference (Attachment A). Additionally, the applicant has provided a document a set of plans dated March 12, 2015 (Attachment B). A copy of the adopted VVMC MP is attached to aid in the review of the proposed redevelopment for compliance with the CUP criteria (Attachment C). III. BACKGROUND The West Wing of the VVMC is located upon a parcel zoned General Use (GU) District. Within the GU District the PEC, in conjunction with the review of the CUP, shall prescribe the following development categories. 1. Lot area and site dimensions. 2. Setbacks. 3. Building height. 4. Density control. 5. Site coverage. 6. Landscaping and site development. 7. Parking and loading. The most recent amendment to the healthcare facility conditional use permit for the hospital occurred in May of 2001 when the Central Wing expansion was approved. The 2001 approval was an amendment to the February 1989 conditional use permit which resulted in the West Wing as it is known today. The current request to expand the West Wing is an amendment to the conditional use permit approved in May of 2001. On January 26, 2015, the PEC, by a unanimous vote of 5-0-1 (Cleveland recused, Cartin absent): Town of Vail Page 2 Forwarded a recommendation of approval, with modifications, with regard to the adoption of Resolution No. 3, Series of 2015, making the VVMC MP an element of the Vail Land Use Plan; and Forwarded a recommendation of approval, with regard to the adoption of Resolution No. 4, Series of 2015, amending the Vail Land Use Plan to establish the VVMC MP land use category and designate it on the Plan Map. On February 23, 2015, the PEC held a work session to discuss the West Wing CUP application. At the hearing the primary focus was on the proposed changes to the building bulk, mass, setbacks, architecture and height. The PEC provided numerous comments highlighting the need to articulate the fagade, address the impacts of the proposed south expansion upon the pedestrian sidewalk and street, a need to provide increased landscaping, and alter material application such as glazing. On March 9, 2015, the PEC held a work session to follow up on building bulk, mass, setbacks, architecture and height and introduce employee housing generation and parking. In general the PEC felt the changes made to the south expansion in terms of articulation and application of materials was moving towards compliance. There were additional comments focusing on the west elevation of the hospital and the need to provide visual interest similar to the changes made to the south expansion. On March 17, 2015, the Vail Town Council adopted Resolutions Nos. 3 and 4, Series of 2015, making the VVMC MP a part of the Vail Comprehensive Plan and adopting a new land use designation for the VVMC citing the Master Plan as the guiding document for future redevelopment on the site. IV. SITE ANALYSIS Address: 181 West Meadow Drive Legal Description: Lots E, and F Vail Village Filing 2 (Lot 10 was not included in this analysis) Existing Zoning: General Use Land Use Designation: Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan Mapped Geological Hazards: None Lot Area: Approximately 3.82 acres/ 166,269 square feet Development Standard General Use District Proposed Existing Minimum Lot Size Prescribed by PEC — Per No change approved development plan currently 3.82 acres/ 166,269 sf Town of Vail Page 3 Minimum Setbacks Prescribed by PEC - Per Front - 3.5 ft approved Development West - 23 ft Plan currently East - 16 ft Front - 22 ft Rear- 28 ft West - 40 ft East - 16 ft Rear - 28 ft Maximum Height Prescribed by PEC - Per 66.5 ft approved development plan currently 60 ft Density Control Not applicable Not applicable Units/acre and GRFA Site coverage Prescribed by PEC - Per 85,000 sf (51.1%) approved development plan currently 78,539 sf (47.2%) Minimum Landscaping Prescribed by PEC - Per 23,981 sf (14.4%) approved development plan currently 22,362 sf (13.4%) Required Parking Prescribed by PEC - Surface Lot - 91 spaces (7 valet)* Existing Structure - 103 spaces Surface Lot 112 spaces Structure 103 spaces The West Wing expansion results Total of 209 spaces in a required need of 62 parking Site deficient -175 spaces. spaces *The applicant's written narrative includes six (6) additional valet spaces in the loading berth for the WB -40 and larger trucks for a total of 13 valet spaces. Staff did not count these toward the total spaces provided. Town of Vail Page 4 V. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING Existina Land Use North: Mixed use South: Residential East: Residential West: Streamtract VI. REVIEW CRITERIA Zoning District Lionshead Mixed Use 1 District Two -Family District High Density Multiple -Family Outdoor Recreation District Before acting on an amendment to conditional use permit application, the PEC shall consider the following factors with respect to the proposed use: Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The proposed redevelopment of the VVMC campus is governed by the VVMC MP and Vail Town Code. The VVMC MP identifies the goals and implementation strategies to be employed to achieve a redevelopment in keeping with the development objectives of the town. There are a number of development objects contained within the VVMC MP. Within the VVMC MP (page 9) there is a list of 13 development objective the Town identified as needing to be addressed with any proposed redeployment on the campus. Those development objectives which are applicable to the West Wing sequence of the overall redevelopment are: 2. On-site loading and delivery facilities. Goal for Loading and Delivery — Design and manage loading and service facilities and functions to meet the needs of VVMC while at the same time minimizing potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and on West Meadow Drive. The VVMC MP identifies the goal of fully enclosing the loading and delivery operations for the campus within the East Wing redevelopment sequence in order to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood. The anticipated enclosed loading and delivery facility will be able to accommodate vehicles and their turning movements within the facility up to a SU -30. The majority of the vehicles delivering to the campus are SU -30 vehicles or smaller. However, there are deliveries from larger vehicles which cannot be accommodated within the anticipated East Wings facility. To accommodate these larger vehicles the design of the west parking lot includes a loading and delivery berth and a plan for the delivery of oxygen (Sheet C3 of Attachment B). The loading and delivery berth is located on the north side of the West Wing of the VVMC and is design to accommodate WB -40 vehicles (typ. beverage delivery vehicles). Additionally, the west parking lot has been designed to Town of Vail Page 5 accommodate the less frequent WB -62 which comes to the site. Vehicles included in the WB -62 classification include the mobile MRI trailer which is used when an MRI on site is being serviced/upgraded/or replaced. Also include in this classification are the trucks which bring replacement mattresses to the site and mobile mammography. As this size of vehicle comes to the site on an infrequent basis and stays for a limited period of time (a couple days) the applicant shows that this vehicle will be accommodated in the north row of parking spaces. Having these vehicles park in this location does have a negative impact on parking when in place. While a mattress truck can be scheduled to occur during times of lower parking demand, the MRI and mobile mammography trailers will be on the site for a period of time rendering the parking spaces unavailable. Staff has identified this as a concern, however, it has been demonstrated that these occurrences are infrequent and can be managed in the interim redevelopment prior to the East Wing. During the review of the East Wing and the determination of the quantity of parking to be included within the structure the overall parking plan should identify the area identified for use as staging for WB -62 vehicles and its impact evaluated in the determination of the overall minimum parking requirement for the VVMC campus. The VVMC additionally has deliveries of oxygen on a less frequent basis for a period of approximately one hour. Oxygen is typically delivered once every 10 to 14 days in the summer and weekly during the winter when usage is increased. It is anticipated the oxygen truck will off load while parking directly to the south of the oxygen tanks occupying a portion of the drive aisle and several parking spaces. The applicant has demonstrated the ability to coordinate this delivery and mange any potential negative impacts during the short duration of time the action is occurring, including coning off the parking spaces so as to not block users in. While this overall development objective will not be address until the East Wing redevelopment sequence is completed, the West Wing redevelopment begins to address those elements which will not be able to be accommodated within the enclosed facility. 3. Ambulance access to and from the site. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West Meadow Drive. Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". In the interim during the redevelopment of the West Wing ambulances will continue to utilize West Meadow Drive for access to the emergency room. 4. Vehicle access that uses South Frontage road for primary access. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West meadow Drive. Town of Vail Page 6 Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance, employee, visitor, and patient access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". The only remaining vehicular traffic on West Meadow Drive generated by the VVMC will be loading and delivery vehicles. In the interim the applicant has proposed to alter the use of the west parking lot and structure parking lot. During the construction of the West Wing the user groups utilizing each parking area will be altered. Employees will utilize the west parking lot and patients and guests will use the structured lot. This proposal accomplishes several objectives. Patients and guests will not need to drive through the construction zone. hazards. • There will be a significant reduction in the number of daily vehicular trips on West Meadow Drive. • Patient and guest parking spaces turn over many more times throughout the day resulting in a significant number of trips. Employees tend to turn over parking spaces only two to three times in a day. This proposal does result in the need to implement the interim South Frontage Road traffic improvement which includes aligning the municipal parking lot access with the VVMC access and the incorporation of medians. Additionally, way -finding signage for the change in user group access to the VVMC will need to occur. A memorandum from TurnKey consultants addressing, Construction Sequence Traffic Impacts & Mitigation (Parking Swap) describes this alteration and its impacts (Attachment D) 5. Minimize vehicle trips on West Meadow Drive. Goal for West Meadow Drive Traffic —Remove the majority of VVMC- generated traffic from West Meadow Drive. Upon completion of the East Wing sequence of redevelopment ambulance, employee, visitor, and patient access will occur off of the South Frontage Road at the VVMC's new "front door". The only remaining vehicular traffic on West Meadow Drive generated by the VVMC will be loading and delivery vehicles. This results in a reduction in the number of trips generated by the VVMC on West Meadow Drive from approximately 1,400 to 56 daily peak trips. There will be no net new vehicle trips added to West Meadow Drive as a result of the West Wing expansion. A result of the proposal to alter the location of the employee and guest/patient parking there will be a reduction in the number of typical peak trips from 1325 (total does not include loading and delivery trips) to 275. 7. Middle Creek Riparian corridor. Goal for Middle Creek — To address existing site conditions along VVMC's boundary with Middle Creek in order to minimize potential impacts from surface drainage on the water quality and the adjacent riparian habitat along the creek. Town of Vail Page 7 The VVMC MP identifies several opportunities to improve the health and aesthetics of Middle Creek adjacent to the west parking lot. Those include: • Re -grading the parking lot or installing gutters to prevent drainage from flowing directly into the creek. • Installation of oil/sand separators or bio-swales to clean run-off before it flows from the site. • Installation of riparian vegetation along VVMC lands adjacent to the creek. • Implementation of "creek sensitive" snow removal/storage practices. • Better defined and demarcated parking areas. The applicant has included a design for the west parking lot. This design is interim for the following reasons: • A need to maximum the number of parking spaces on the site during the construction of the West and East Wings in order to continue operating the campus. • The potential land exchange if it occurred would involve the west parking lot and create a need to alter its configuration. • A need to meet the requirements for a minimum of a 10 -foot buffer around the parking lot as required by Section 14-5-2, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code. • A need to meet the minimum snow storage requirement of 30% as required by Section 14-5-2, Other Requirements, Vail Town Code. In order to address the goal of minimizing potential impacts to Middle Creek, prior to establishing and constructing a final parking lot design in conjunction with the East Wing sequence, the applicant is proposing to implement several improvements in the interim. Those improvements include: • The installation of a sand/oil separator to capture and filter the drainage off the parking lot. • The installation of curb and gutter along the perimeter of the parking lot to direct drainage to the sand/oil separator and clearly establish the boundaries of the parking area. • Installation of a low fence along the creek to create a visual and physical barrier to the pushing of snow toward the creek. • Development of a snow management strategy which does not include pushing snow toward the creek, but the utilization of islands and parking spaces when needed. Snow may have to be physically removed from the site when the need arise and parking is negatively impacted. • Development of a plan for cleaning and restoring the riparian areas of Middle Creek. Eagle River Water and Sanitation District has provided preliminary authorization for the hospital to develop this plan and proceed through the process for improvements to its property. Town of Vail Page 8 8. Provide on-site parking in full compliance with parking requirements. Goal for Parking — To increase the supply of on-site parking to an amount that when coupled with managed parking solutions meets the needs of patients, visitors, and employees. The VVMC MP in Chapter 7 speaks to the current deficiency in parking for the VVMC campus and the need to provide adequate parking as an element for the redevelopment. Chapter 7 contains the analysis and discussion that occurred during the VVMC MP adoption process to aid in the determination of the appropriate method for determining required parking for the redevelopment. It was determined that an appropriate method of calculating parking demand was to include: space per patient bed space per exam room space per day shift employee (staffing peak) Based upon this methodology the West Wing sequence generates a need for 41 new parking spaces. Additionally, the west parking lot reconfiguration results in a need for 21 parking spaces which are lost. Overall there is a need to provide 62 parking spaces for the West Wing expansion. 9. Define appropriate location for vehicle access off of South Frontage Road. Goal for South Frontage Road Access — Collaborate with neighboring properties to define and implement improvements to the South Frontage Road that will provide safe and efficient site access to VVMC, the Town Hall site and the Evergreen Lodge. The VVMC MP identifies the final traffic solution to address this goal as a round about located in the approximate location of the existing emergency helipad. Additionally, the plan identifies and interim traffic solution to address access needs as the roundabout is not anticipated to be constructed until after the completion of the East Wing when the emergency helipad operations will be relocated to the VVMC site. No net new vehicle trips will be added to West meadow Drive as a result of the west Wing expansion. 10. Potential use of Lot 10 and/or the Town's municipal center site. Per direction previously received from the Town Council the applicant has proceeded with designing the west parking lot without consideration of the VVMC shared property line with Lot 10. As can be seen in the proposed plans access to parking on Lot 10 will occur via circulation through the hospital parking. The applicant will need to continue work with the Town Council to determine what improvements will ultimately be permitted upon Lot 10. There will be a need for vehicular access easement through the hospital parking lot to Lot 10. Town of Vail Page 9 13. Screening of mechanical equipment. The applicants have proposed to screen the roof top mechanical equipment with a metal panel screen wall inset from the perimeter of the hospital fagade to address height concerns expressed by the PEC. The Design review Board will be tasked with reviewing the adequacy of the proposed mechanical screening. Employee Generation Mitigation Goal for Employee Housing — To provide employee housing consistent with the provisions of Chapter 23 of the Vail Town Code. On March 9, 2015, the PEC heard a presentation on the efforts underway to determine the employee mitigation generation rate for the VVMC campus. A report was discussed identifying the applicants request for the PEC to make a finding to allow for the mitigation of the entirety of the employee generation off-site. Staff has identified several elements of the submitted analysis which were in need of additional information to aid in the determination of the employee generation mitigation rate. This analysis is ongoing and has not been completed. Staff and the applicant are recommending the PEC defers the review of the analysis and determination of the appropriate employee mitigation generation rate to the April 13th public hearing. The staff and applicant do believe a review of the request to provide all the employee housing mitigation requirement off-site can occur. Chapter 12-23, Commercial Linkage, Vail Town Code, establishes the methodology for determining the generation of employees and requirements for mitigation for commercial land uses. Section 12-23-6, Methods of Mitigation, Vail Town Code, includes a regulation requiring 50% of the required employee generation mitigation to occur on site. An exception to this requirement can be granted by the PEC if one of four findings can be made. The applicant has included in there written analysis, a response to the findings that must be made to grant an exemption to this requirement. 12-23-6: Methods of Mitigation: A. For all new construction (i.e., development that does not affect any existing buildings or structures) and demo/rebuild projects that result in a mitigation requirement of 1.25 employees or greater, no less than one-half (1/2) the mitigation of employee housing required by this chapter shall be accomplished with on site units. 1. Exceptions: At the sole discretion of the applicable governing body, an exception may be granted from this subsection based upon one of the following findings: Town of Vail Page 10 a. Implementation of the on site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. b. Implementation of the on site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. c. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on site unit mitigation method. d. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on site mitigation unit method. The VVMC MP speaks to the employee mitigation requirement in Chapter 9, specifically page 32. The VVMC MP addresses the requirement to provide 50% of the required employee housing mitigation on site. It discusses two primary reasons to be considered in making a finding to exempt this redevelopment from this requirement. Incompatibility of residential uses and the institutional healthcare facility. Limited land area resource which should be utilized for current and future healthcare facility needs. The applicant speaks to the provision of employee housing on pages 19-21 of the written narrative. The applicant address several of the findings identified above at the arguments for making a finding to permit 100% of the employee mitigation requirement to occur off-site. Staff believes for two reasons a finding can be made to permit the off- site provision of the required employee mitigation. Those reasons include: • The primary purpose of the General Use District is for the provision public and quasi -public uses which, operate with unique impacts. In this case a healthcare facility which is open 365 days a year, 24 hours a day. • The need to ensure adequate ability to expand the VVMC campus in the future to address health care needs. With the exception of the need to return to the PEC to determine the employee housing generation rate and the need to include a stream back restoration for Middle Creek staff believes the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs. The fact that the building is expanding outward and upward will have impacts upon light and air. However, the applicant has been responding to comment from the PEC to address bulk, mass, setback, and height concerns which should mitigate the negative Town of Vail Page 11 impacts created by the redevelopment. Staff does not believe there will be any impact upon the distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities needs as a result of this redevelopment. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 3. Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. Staff's response to Criterion 1 addresses the interim and overall impact to traffic trip generation, circulation, and site access during the West Wing sequence of redevelopment and ultimately upon completion of the East Wing. The VVMC campus redevelopment will ultimately resulting a significant decrease in VVMC generated traffic trips on West Meadow Drive. As anticipated the VVMC will have a new "front door" with access directly off of the South Frontage Road for all user groups with the exception of loading and delivery vehicles. Additionally, upon construction of the East Wing pedestrian circulation routes will be established to allow for a north south connection between West Meadow Drive and the South Frontage Road. This connection is identified within the VVMC MP. The interim west parking lot design includes provisions for snow storage and management. As there is a desire to maximize parking space on the west parking lot during the redevelopment of the campus the applicant was only able to achieve 18% snow storage include the temporary use of the north row of parking. For an unheated parking lot 30% of the area needs to be accounted for to accommodate snow storage. The applicant has identified that in the interim a managed solution included the off loading of snow will need to occur to address the need to provide parking for the campus. In the interim staff believes the strategies identified will adequate address the need to provide snow storage and parking. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Goal for Building Massing — The massing (and scale) of hospital expansions to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood. Goal for Building Relationship to West Meadow Drive — To establish an appropriate physical and visual relationship between the hospital and the pedestrian corridor along West Meadow Drive by use of effective building design, architecture and landscape improvements. Town of Vail Page 12 Goal for Architecture — To integrate the design of new buildings and expansion areas with existing portions of the hospital so as to create a varied but unified architectural expression. The VVMC MP speaks to each of these goal statements on pages 12 through 17 of Chapter 4. The PEC has held two public hearings at which building massing, relationship to West Meadow Drive, and Architecture have been discussed. The applicant presented response to feedback at the March 9th hearing where there was general agreement that the changes were appropriate in addressing the goal statements. There was comment regarding the need to carry the changes which were implemented on the south expansion to the west elevation in order to provide greater visual interest. The applicant has made a number of revisions to the west elevation to address the feedback heard on March 9th. Those changes can be found on sheet A201 of Attachment B. Changes include fagade materials, window configuration, articulations, etc. A rendering has been included within Attachment B. Additional renderings will be presented at the hearing to aid in understanding material transitions, shadowing, and articulation. With regard to the south expansion's relationship with West Meadow Drive there was a great deal of discussion about the appropriate setback, landscape buffer, and building articulation. As a result of feedback from the PEC the applicant is proposing a south expansion which includes the basement and first level at a setback of 8 to 12.5 feet over a length of 77 feet and levels two, three, and four at a setback of 3.5 to 6 feet (faces of column elements) for a length of approximately 51feet. This was done to accomplish the following objectives: Creation of an appropriate relationship with the pedestrian on the sidewalk by eliminating a 66.5 foot tall building immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. Allow for the implementation of a landscape plan which will address buffering for pedestrians and neighboring properties. Creation of visual interest in the fagade of the building and relationships to other parts of the building which have upper floor cantilevers. The applicant placed an emphasis on creating a design which through articulation, material application, landscaping, etc. creates an appropriate relationship with adjacent the neighborhood. The result has been a design based performance approach to addressing bulk, mass, height, and setbacks to accomplish relationships with the neighborhood and maintain the character. Staff believes that the West Wing redevelopment meets this criterion. 5. Such other factors and criteria as the commission deems applicable to the proposed use. Town of Vail Page 13 VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2, and regard thereto. Staff's recommendation is based upon the review of the criteria described in Section VI of this memorandum and the evidence and testimony presented. Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approves, with conditions, this request; the Community Development Department recommends the Commission pass the following motion: "The Planning and Environmental Commission approves, with conditions, an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to Section 12-9C-3, Conditional Uses, Vail Town Code, for an existing healthcare facility, amending the development plan to allow for an additional floor plate on the west wing, located at 181 West Meadow Drive and 108 South Frontage Road West (Vail Valley Medical Center)/Lots E, F, and 10 Vail Village Filing 2, Lot 2E, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Filing 1 and Lot D-2, A Resubdivision of Lot D, Vail Village Filing 2, and setting forth details in regard thereto. " Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approves, with conditions, this request; the Community Development Department recommends the Commission include the following conditions: "The following conditions/expectations will be included within the pre -development agreement between the Vail Valley Medical Center and the Town of Vail. That agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. 1. A finding has been made by the PEC to mitigate 100% of the employee generation created by this proposal off-site. The VVMC shall submit a final Employee Housing Report (to determine employee generation rate and required mitigation) for review and approval by the PEC prior to submittal of a building permit application for the West Wing. 2. Due to the uncertainly of the potential Evergreen Lodge land exchange and the future of Lot 10 and how these factors could influence final decisions on the design of the VVMC parking lot, VVMC shall return to the PEC prior to construction of parking lot improvements reflected in this CUP application. The purpose of this review will be to present any changes to parking lot design and/or Town of Vail Page 14 additional information regarding such improvements that may include but not be limited to: • Defining an access easement over VVMC property for access to Town of Vail parking spaces, • Evaluation of appropriate setbacks between the VVMC's westerly property line and west edge of parking lot with regard to requirements for screening, stream health, and snow storage, and • Town Council's formal approval of changes to Lot 10. 3. Prior to implementing changes to parking management (shifting patient/guest parking to East Structure and employee parking to West Lot), VVMC shall obtain or provide to town staff.- • Access permit approval from CDOT for interim South Frontage Road access improvements to both VVMC and Town Hall site, • Town Council approval of improvements to Town Hall site, • Detailed design of interim access improvements, • Construction schedule demonstrating completion of improvements prior to November 1, 2015, • Plans for manual traffic control measures (if deemed necessary by the Town) until such time interim access improvements are in place, and • Plans for how parking changes will be implemented, to include but not limited to improved wayfinding on Campus and in immediate vicinity (road signs), outreach/education programs, role of valet/concierge, any physical improvements to East Structure. 4. VVMC provides to town staff a lease for a minimum of 15 off-site parking spaces prior to the issuance of a building permit for the West Wing (to compensate for the 15 reduction to existing spaces from the re -design of the parking lot, until such time the East Wing is completed). 5. VVMC provides staff with a lease for a minimum of 41 spaces prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the West Wing, (to compensate for the parking demand of the WW expansion, until such time the East Wing is completed) 6. VVMC provides a construction management plan for review and approval by town staff prior to the issuance of building permit for the West Wing. 7. VVMC provides a comprehensive roof plan as part of a DRB application depicting all rooftop mechanical devices and equipment and design features proposed to screen such devices and features. 8. VVMC address outstanding Public Works comments prior to issuance of building permit: • Demonstrate valet parking conformance with Town Code and potential conflicts with valet spaces and truck turning movements. Any change to the number of valet parking spaces will directly affect the minimum Town of Vail Page 15 number of required off-site parking spaces to be leased pursuant to Condition 4. • Provide a final drainage study, • Modify drainage plan to route clean groundwater (from de -watering system) separately from storm water. • Work with town staff to define the preferred location for the water quality vault. 9. VVMC shall develop a plan for cleaning and restoring the bank of Middle Creek adjacent to the VVMC site and proceed through the appropriate process for completion by November 1, 2015." Should the Planning and Environmental Commission choose to approve this amendment to the Conditional Use Permit , the Community Development Department recommends the Commission makes the following findings: "Based upon the review of the criteria outlined in Section VI of the Staff memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission dated March 23, 2015, and the evidence and testimony presented, the Planning and Environmental Commission finds: 1. The Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit is are in accordance with the purposes of the Zoning Regulations and the General Use District,- 2. istrict,2. The Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. The proposed Amendments to the Conditional Use Permit comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 12-16, Conditional Use Permit, Vail Town Code. " VIII. ATTACHMENTS A. Applicant's written narrative dated revised March 18, 2015 B. Proposed plans dated March 12, 2015 C. Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan D. Memorandum from Turn Key Consulting dated March 19, 2015 Town of Vail Page 16 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 50 March 13, 2015, revised March 18, 2015 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER West Wing Conditional Use Permit Application January 2015, revised 3/13/15, 3/18/15 I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide information on the proposed re -development of the West Wing of the Vail Valley Medical Center. Information provided herein has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the Town of Vail development review process. This application has been submitted on behalf of the Vail Valley Medical Center. The West Wing expansion involves just under 45,000sf of new space, the focal point of which is a new fourth floor on this wing of the medical center. As described in the VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP), the West Wing represents the first sequence of construction in the redevelopment and expansion of the campus. The construction sequence for VVMC's expansion and the importance of the West Wing as the first step in this process are outlined in subsequent sections of this report. Two development applications have been submitted: • Development Plan for the construction of new buildings and site improvements, and • Conditional Use Permit for a "health care facility" in the General Use (GU) zone district. Each of these applications and a summary of the proposed redevelopment plans are described in detail below. Information provided in this report is presented in the following sections: I. Introduction II. Overview of VVMC and Project Background III. Project Site Conditions IV. Description of Project V. Conformance with Applicable CUP Review Criteria VI. Appendix In addition to this report, design plans and other material as required for Development Plan and CUP applications has been submitted under separate cover. A site plan of the proposed West Wing expansion is found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 2 Conditional Use Permit Application EVERGREEN LODGE '___________i_T_ _--_- • 4 A •rj,2 } :- �W t a - .. ___________ _______ Illustrative site plan ofproposed West Wing Expansion WMC West Wing Expansion Page 3 Conditional Use Permit Application II. OVERVIEW of VVMC and PROJECT BACKGROUND Since its establishment in 1965, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) has grown into one of the world's most advanced mountain hospitals, providing Olympic -quality sports medicine, leading evidence -based research, modern cancer care and extensive cardiology capabilities. Today, VVMC is comprised of several healthcare campuses located throughout Eagle County and provides healthcare services to both residents and visitors of the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado. VVMC's Vail campus provides an essential service to the Vail community and the surrounding region. While the medical care and services provided by VVMC are outstanding, the hospital's infrastructure is due for modernization. VVMC is at an age and condition where it must be updated to meet the needs of modern medicine and to ensure the facility provides medical staff with the resources necessary to offer the utmost in quality health care. Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan The Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP) provides general direction and a framework for how VVMC will redevelop in the future. It was prepared with extensive input from physicians and staff, neighbors, the community at large, review boards and Town of Vail staff. The VVMC MP addresses a multitude of operational, clinical, and technical requirements specific to the campus and it also addresses important neighborhood and community goals. The VVMC MP established expectations for how VVMC's expansion plans will be implemented and this Plan has provided the basis for this development application. When applicable this report describes below how the VVMC MP addresses topics relevant to this development application. Economic Impact of VVMC VVMC has grown into a major economic driver in Vail and Eagle County, helping to diversify and balance an otherwise highly seasonal economy. With more than 850 employees, VVMC is the second largest employer in Eagle County. This consideration alone has a very significant economic impact throughout the community. As documented by two studies, VVMC and its partners who practice at the Vail Campus have a direct economic impact to Vail. A Vail Valley Medical Center Economic Impact Analysis was completed by BBC Research and Consulting in 2009. The direct annual economic impact of VVMC-related spending in Vail was over $5 million, which included retail and restaurant spending by employees, employee -residents, patients and their families. This report identified other notable benefits of VVMC beyond direct economic stimulation. Foremost among these is that the high-quality healthcare being provided by VVMC gives Vail gives and Eagle County a competitive marketing advantage over other mountain communities (particularly with regard to real estate). VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 4 Conditional Use Permit Application In April of 2010, BBC Research and Consulting completed an Economic Impact of The Steadman Clinic and the Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) on the Town of Vail. Operations of the Clinic and Institute generate over $25 million annually to businesses in the Town of Vail. VVMC, the Steadman Clinic and Institute have a direct economic impact of more than $30 million annually. This is in addition to the annual on-site economic activity at VVMC. The majority of this economic activity is from the large number of "destination patients" drawn to Vail by the Steadman Clinic. In 2009 the Clinic served 10,500 patients. 4,600 of these patients involved surgeries, of which nearly 3,000 were destination patients. On average these patients made three trips to Vail, brought 2.25 people and stayed 4 days, equating to over 80,000 visitor nights in local lodging properties. Spending on lodging, meals and retail from these visitors represent a significant portion of the Town of Vail economic activity generated by The Steadman Clinic and Institute. Implementation of VVMC's Redevelopment and Expansion Plans A major consideration in the design and planning of VVMC expansion plans is to ensure the on-going operation of the hospital during construction. This is the main reason why VVMC expansion will start with construction of the West Wing. Development of the West Wing will create new space to allow for the consolidation and or relocation of a number of existing uses on the campus. Foremost among these users is The Steadman Clinic and SPRI. These organizations are currently located in five different areas throughout the campus and with construction of the West Wing they will be consolidated on the new fourth floor. This and other consolidations will free up existing space in the Central Wing of the campus that can then accommodate existing uses currently located in the East Wing. This re -location is critical to moving forward with the construction of the East Wing. The diagram on the following page depicts the three wings of the campus and the anticipated construction timeframe for the East and West Wings. i s � r r+ Lrntral West Wing L4'In1 Ipk4h,,ApM. W, IIIc VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application iVlCdical � P[OFN5S101'!al 9uilding J Cast Wine;- ., iu 5G . A�= - ,�,,.I�I App x: r 1'Mc Redeve4mtmt Master Plan a �s M Page 5 III. PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS WMC is located on three parcels of land that total 4.57 acres. As depicted on the site context drawing below, the West Wing of the hospital is located at the western end of the campus. The site is bordered on the north by South Frontage Road and on the south by West Meadow Drive. Vehicular access to WMC is provided by South Frontage Road and West Meadow Drive. South Frontage Road provides access to an employee parking structure located at the northeast corner of the campus and to the US Bank building. West Meadow Drive provides access to patient and guest parking at the west end of the campus and to loading/service facilities located at the southeast corner of the campus. go ^� West Wing Expansion - s _ i _- - - -- ��—+WMC TiOcvelppment Master Plan 11 1 Bax Map Af — V4 GA..& VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 6 Conditional Use Permit Application IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Below is a summary of the proposed project and detailed discussion of specific elements of the proposed West Wing. The project's conformance with applicable review criteria is found in Section V. of this report. Summary of Proposed Expansion of West Wing West Wing project involves additions to the existing building, site work to the west parking lot, landscape/streetscape enhancement and interim site improvements necessary to service the hospital. The following is a description of proposed improvements. West Wing Building Improvements Major elements of the West Wing expansion include the following: • A new fourth level that will provide space for The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI). This space will allow these two organizations to consolidate their operations which are currently dispersed throughout the campus in multiple locations. • Third level expansion will enhance the existing Surgical Suites area of the hospital. The focal point of this expansion is to increase pre-op and recovery areas, to expand staff support space, and to relocate and expand the Sterile Processing Department. • The focal point of the Second Level expansion is to allow for the conversion of a number of double -bed patient rooms to single rooms. • First Level expansion will create expanded lobby and circulation spaces, expand Howard Head Sports Medicine, and provide space for SPRI. In addition to the new square footage outlined above, much of the West Wing will be renovated and re -purposed as a part of this project. Expansion to the West Wing will provided new and renovated space that is critical to providing quality patient care. As mentioned above, another important consideration, or result, of this new West Wing expansion is that it will provide space for the relocation of existing uses in the Central and East Wings (that will then allow for the demolition and reconstruction of the East Wing). West Wing Site Improvements Site improvements associated with the West Wing expansion include the following: • A portion of the existing parking lot is redesigned and re -graded. Re -grading is necessary due to changes to the entry to the West Wing and to conform to ADA standards. • Redesign/re-grading of the entry drive off of West Meadow Drive. • Installation of curb along west side of lot to direct run-off away from Middle Creek and to better demarcate parking areas. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 7 Conditional Use Permit Application • Installation of storm water quality improvements (oil/sand separator, curb) and restoration of the east bank of the Middle Creek corridor adjacent the West Lot. • Relocation of the liquid oxygen storage tank (from West Meadow Drive to the north side of parking lot). • New surface loading area on north side of West Wing (for larger trucks, mobile imaging truck, etc.). • Redesign of the portion of parking lot located on adjoining Lot 10 (owned by Town of Vail). Temporary Generator Location The West Wing will necessitate the re -location of a generator that is currently located in the basement of the West Wing. The generator will temporarily be located immediately north of the West Wing. Upon completion of the East Wing the generator will be moved to its permanent location in the new Central Plant. Parking Lot Improvements While a final parking lot design is provided with this CUP application, a number of factors may necessitate changes to this plan. Foremost among are how the potential land exchange with the Evergreen Lodge and the future status of Lot 10 could affect parking lot design. It is assumed that proposed parking lot improvements will not be constructed until the end of the West Wing expansion, roughly the fall of 2016. If events unfold such that changes to the parking lot design are necessary VVMC will return to the PEC to present amendments to final parking lot improvements. Building Design The design of the West Wing has been done in response to the design guidelines and considerations outlined in the VVMC MP. Materials and detailing from the existing Central Wing/Women's Center have influenced materials on the West Wing. Building off -sets, stepbacks and building materials have been used to articulate the building to minimize its mass along West Meadow Drive. Landscape and streetscape treatments have also been used to soften the buildings relationship to West Meadow Drive. Renderings of the West Wing are found on the following page. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 8 Conditional Use Permit Application The use of stone on the West Wing complements the existing Central Wing and serves to unify the project design. Articulation of the south fagade reduces the perceived scale of the building. Landscape Design Landscape and streetscape improvement plans have been submitted. Major elements of these plans include: • Restoration of the ground surface immediately west of the West Lot and east of Middle Creek. • Landscape islands within the redesigned parking lot. • Plant materials along West Meadow Drive to "soften" the visual impact of the building and to add color and interest along the street. • Outdoor dining patio along West Meadow Drive. • Use of a heat -melt system on the walkway/ramp that connects the West Wing entry with the Town's sidewalk along West Meadow Drive. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 9 Conditional Use Permit Application Conceptual plan for streetscape and landscape improvements along West Meadow Drive. The walkway from the Town's sidewalk to the West Wing entry will be heated. More specific information and analysis of improvements proposed to the West Wing is provided below for: Zoning/Development Standards Building Expansion/Re-organization of Uses and Square Footage Parking Traffic Employee Housing Zoning/Development Standards In the GU District the following development standards are to be proposed by the applicant and "prescribed by the PEC" as a part of the review of the CUP. The following summarizes proposed development standards relative to the West Wing. Development standards for site coverage, landscaping and setbacks have been calculated based on the land area of the portion of the VVMC campus zoned General Use. Lot Area and Site Dimensions The VVMC campus is located on four parcels of land that comprise +/-4.57 acres. For the purposes of this CUP application, only the land area of Lots E and F, Vail Village Filing 2 (the main campus that is zoned GU, and exclusive of the US Bank parcel and the small parcel of land recently purchased from the Evergreen Lodge) is included in defining development standards. The land area addressed by this CUP is 3.8 acres, or 166,269sf. A survey of the subject parcel has been provided under separate cover. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 10 Conditional Use Permit Application Setbacks Proposed setbacks for the West Wing are as follows: Front (along West Meadow Drive) Proposed — varies from 3.5' to 33' Side (to the west property line w/Lot 10) — Proposed — varies from 23' to 45' Rear (to the north property line) Proposed —varies from 105' to 121' Building Height The proposed roof of the West Wing is at elevation 8,205'. While the grade along Meadow Drive varies, the average grade along the south elevation is +/-8145, meaning the West Wing is +/-60 in height. Building heights are depicted on elevations and other drawings provided in the design package that has been submitted under separate cover. Density Control N/A Landscape Proposed landscape area is 25,115sf, or 15.1% of the total site area. Existing landscape area is 22,362sf, or 13.4%. Site Coverage Proposed site coverage is 85,000sf, or 51.1% of the total site area. Existing site coverage is 78,539sf, or 47.2%. Parking and Loading Parking demand from the West Wing expansion, how proposed parking is addressing this demand, parking management, truck access and snow storage is address in subsequent sections of this report. Plans and diagrams depicting site coverage, setbacks, and landscape area have been provided under separate cover. Building Expansion/Re-Organization of Uses and Square Footage The West Wing expansion will trigger a significant amount of re -organization and re- location of uses with VVMC. Below is a comparison of existing square footage and uses to proposed square footage and uses. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 11 Conditional Use Permit Application understanding of the net new increase in square footage from the West Wing expansion and specifically how this will affect parking requirements (note that a similar analysis of how expansion will impact new employee generation is provided in the WMC Employee Housing Plan that is provided under separate cover). Floor plans depicting existing and proposed uses, square footages, and other changes to the West Wing are found at the end of this report. Basement Level Existing uses in the basement level include the hospital cafeteria, back of the house functions (computer room, mechanical spaces, etc.) and a small office used by the Facilities Department. A relatively minor expansion to the basement level is proposed. Net square footage increases from 4,754sf to 7,484sf. Minor changes will be made to the cafeteria and back of house uses. The Facility Department office will be removed and +/-3,230sf of meeting room space will be created. This space will replace +/-1,900 sf of existing meeting room space that is currently located in the East Wing. In summary, changes to the basement level will have no impact on parking or other CUP review process considerations. Level 1 The two major uses currently located on the Level Tare Colorado Mountain Medical (CMM) and Howard Head Sports Medicine (HHSM). Other uses include the retail pharmacy, gift shop, an MRI room and the main lobby. A portion of the West Wing south fagade will be expanded and the main entry to the building will be expanded to the west and north. Net square footage on Level 1 increases from 11,171 sf to 17,279sf. The southern expansion will provide additional space for HHSM (but more importantly provide a building footprint for expanded space for the Patient Care area on the second floor and for the Surgical Suites on the third floor). HHSM increases in size by 3,300sf, but this square footage will result in only two additional patient treatment areas and two additional employees. The majority of the new square footage for HHSM will provide for larger patient treatment areas and exercise/performance areas for patients and for expanded staff support space. CMM will be relocated to the US Bank Building and reduced in size from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms. SPRI will be re -located in this space (and space of the new fourth floor) and occupy 5,700sf on Level 1. Minor expansions will be made to the pharmacy and the gift shop. In summary, the expansion to HHSM will result in a modest increase to parking demand as will the SPRI expansion. The re -location of CCM will result in a reduction in West Wing parking demand. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 12 Conditional Use Permit Application Level 2 While Patient Care (hospital beds) and Intensive care will remain the primary uses on the second floor, a new Cardiac Catheterization Lab (Cath Lab) is currently under construction on Level 2. The Cath Lab necessitated the re -location of four ICU beds, which in turn displaced four patient beds. These four beds will not be replaced, resulting in a total reduction of VVMC beds from 58 to 54. Net square footage on Level 2 increases from 16,349sf to 18,836sf. Expanded floor area is primarily a function of the building expansion to the south side of. Expansion in this specific area is necessary due to the existing layout and functions on the patient care unit. West Wing will add a total of 2,487 square feet to Level 2. Of this additional square footage, 1,630 square feet is dedicated to the new Cath Lab. The balance of new square footage will provide space to enhance other aspects of patient care. In summary, the Cath Lab will have a modest increase to parking requirements. This increase, however, this is off -set by the removal of four hospital beds. Level 3 Surgical Suites (including four operating rooms and associated pre-op and post-op areas) and the Steadman Clinic are the two existing uses on Level 3. The Steadman Clinic space will be re -located to the new fourth floor and upon completion of the West Wing the entire third floor will be devoted to the Surgery Suites and the directly related use of Sterile Processing. Square footage devoted to the Surgery Suites nearly doubles in size. Total square footage on Level 3 increases from 16,344sf to 21,780sf, an increase of 5,436sf. While there is no increase in the number of operating rooms, space devoted to pre-op, post-op and support spaces increases significantly. Sterile Processing is currently located in the East Wing. While the new Sterile Processing area will increase in size, there will be no increases in the number of employees. In summary, while there will be an increase is square footage to the Surgical Suites the number of operating rooms is unchanged and no increase in patient capacity will result. As such there is no new parking demand on Level 3. Level 4 Level 4 will provide 24,443sf of new space for the Steadman Clinic and SPRI. SPRI will occupy approximately 7,278sf on Level 4 and when added to their 5,700sf on Level 1 SPRI will have 13,050sf of space in the West Wing. After vacating their existing offices in the Central and East Wings SPRI will have a net gain of 4,222sf. The new Steadman Clinic space totals 17,165sf. After vacating 8,401 sf of existing space in the West and Central Wings, the Clinic will have a net gain of 8,764sf. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 13 Conditional Use Permit Application In summary, expansions to SPRI and the Steadman Clinic will both result in increased parking demand generated by increased number of employees and in the case of the Clinic from an increase to patient exam rooms. Parking and Circulation The following section addresses parking requirements from the West Wing expansion, parking lot design, parking solution, changes to how parking will be managed, truck access, and snow storage. Parking Requirements for West Wing Expansion Parking demand for the West Wing was calculated using the "employee based" parking formula outlined in the WMP MP. This formula is: • 1 space per patient bed • 1 space per exam room • 1 space per day shift employee Based on this formula the parking requirement for the West Wing is: Level B — no new parking demand Level 1 — 2 new exam rooms/patient tables at HHSM 2 new employees at HHSM 4 total parking spaces (parking demand from SPRI addressed in Level 4) Level 2 - 2 new exam rooms at Cath Lab 3 new employees at Cath Lab 5 total parking spaces Level 3 - no new parking demand Level 4 - 6 new employees at SPRI 13 new exam rooms at Steadman Clinic 25 new employees at Steadman Clinic 44 total parking spaces The total parking demand from the expansion of the West Wing is 53 spaces. The relocation of CMM to the US Bank Building and their reduction from 16 exam rooms to 8 exam rooms results in a reduction of 8 parking spaces. The removal of four patient beds on Level 2 results in a reduction of 4 parking spaces. The net parking requirement for the West Win is 's 41 spaces. Proposed Parking Lot Design The west parking lot has been redesigned due to ADA considerations related to the West Wing expansion. The most significant aspect of this redesign is the re -grading of WMC West Wing Expansion Page 14 Conditional Use Permit Application portions of the lot and the access drive from West Meadow Drive. Other features of the redesigned lot include: • New access to the Town's 16 parking space on Lot 10 • Increased interior landscaping consistent with the Town's standards (10.9%) • 10 handicapped parking spaces • Provisions for access by large trucks (discussed below) • Water Quality measures to improve the parking lots relationship to Middle Creek (discussed below) The redesign of the lot resulted in a new reduction of parking spaces. The proposed lot provides 84 VVMC spaces. With the valet program to be operated by VVMC an additional 13 spaces will be created, resulting in a total of 97 spaces. Currently 112 spaces are in the West Lot, meaning a net loss of 15 spaces from what currently exists. The Parking Solution The West Wing expansion creates a new demand of 41 parking spaces and the reduction of 15 spaces means total of 56 parking spaces are needed. These spaces will be provided on-site when the East Wing is constructed. Until the time East Wing parking is available VVMC will lease 56 off-site spaces. Leases for the 15 "lost spaces" will be in place prior to issuance of a building permit for the West Wing. Leases for the 41 new spaces for the West Wing expansion will be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the West Wing. Changes to Parking Lot Management Currently 106 of the 112 spaces in the West Lot are used by patients and guests. The East Parking Structure is used exclusively by employees. Changes in parking management will shift patient/guest parking to the East Lot and the 97 spaces in the West Lot will be used by employees. This change will take effect during the early phases of West Wing construction. This parking change will accomplish two things — • Patients and guest will be able to access VVMC without having to interface with West Wing Construction, and • The changing in parking will dramatically reduce the VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. The reduction in daily trips on West Meadow Drive will be from approximately 1,325 trips during peak days to approximately 275 trips. Moving patient/guest parking to the East Structure will require a comprehensive program to inform VVMC patients and guests of this change. This program will involve outreach and education for VVMC patients and guests, on-site greeters/concierge service at the entry to the East Structure and improved way -finding within the Campus and directional signs on surrounding roadways. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 15 Conditional Use Permit Application As described below, improvements to the South Frontage Road will be necessary in order to accommodate increased traffic volume at the entry to the East Structure. Plans for implementing these improvements are discussed below. Truck Access A new, enclosed loading and delivery facility will be constructed as an element of the East Wing. Until that time loading for the West Wing will be handled in the existing loading facility. The loading and delivery plan for VVMC involves accommodating large trucks in the West Lot. The truck/delivery survey done during the summer of 2015 indicates that on average once each day a truck larger than a SU30 services VVMC. These "larger" trucks will be accommodated in the West Lot. • WB40 sized trucks can be accommodated in a dedicated truck bay located immediately north of the West Wing. This size truck covers most of the larger truck deliveries. • The liquid oxygen tank to the West Lot. The tank has been located to allow turning movements for this WB40 truck to service the tank. The truck will for a brief period of time obstruct a handful of parking spaces. This truck delivers on average once every two weeks, more frequently when surgery caseloads are high. Deliveries can be scheduled and require less than one hour of time. • On the rare occasion that a WB62 truck delivers to VVMC it can be accommodated in the West Lot. The truck will obstruct a handful of parking spaces, however given the extremely limited frequency of this sized truck servicing the hospital, this is not considered to be an issue. Truck turning studies demonstrating how WB40 and WB62 trucks can maneuver in the West Lot have been provided under separate cover. Snow Storage Town codes require snow storage areas equal to 30% of the parking lot area. Snow storage is typically provided within interior landscape islands and on the perimeter of parking areas. Usable areas for snow storage at VVMC are very limited. Areas to the west of the parking lot will not be used in order to not plow snow into Middle Creek. While there is land area north of the parking lot, this area is not viable due to a retaining wall that runs the length of the parking lot. Areas to the south of the lot are too close to Meadow Drive and the hospital itself defines the eastern edge of the parking lot. The snow storage plan for VVMC utilizes interior landscape islands and parking spaces along the north side of the lot. These areas represent 18% of the parking lot area. The snow storage plan will entail storing snow along the northern row of parking stalls and throughout the winter when necessary trucking snow from the parking lot. 18 spaces are VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 16 Conditional Use Permit Application labeled "snow storage". However, it is unlikely that all 18 spaces will be used for snow storage except for during extreme snow cycles. Hauling snow as necessary will be done to ensure a minimal number of parking spaces are used for snow storage at any given time. % • • '� • �+ l f� � f , � rr J I 1� Snow Storage Summary Paved Area = 46,841 sf Snow Storage Shawn - 8,525 sf (18%j VVMC West Wing CUP Parking Lot Zoning Analysis Snow Storage Immediate Parking Lot/Water Quality Measures Page 8 of this report describes how parking lot improvements, including steps to improve water quality and the relationship of the parking lot with Middle Creek will not be implemented until the end of West Wing construction (late 2016). Three immediate steps will be taken to address this issue: • Installation of a low-level fence or barrier to define the parking lot and to prevent snow from being deposited into the creek corridor, • Restoration of the ground surface on the east bank of Middle Creek, and Improved snow management practices. Traffic A traffic report summarizing the traffic impacts of the West Wing has been completed by Turnkey Consulting LLC. A copy of this report is found in the appendix. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 17 Conditional Use Permit Application As described above, VVMC is changing their management of parking by shifting employee parking to the West Lot and patient/guest parking to the East Structure. The focus of the traffic report was to address the traffic implications of this change to how parking is managed. The change in parking management will have a significant impact on West Meadow Drive by dramatically reducing the VVMC-generated traffic. Daily, peak period VVMC- generated traffic on West Meadow Drive is expected to reduce from approximately 1,325 trips per day to approximately 275 trips per day. This is a function of two factors — the re -design of the West Lot has reduced its capacity (from 112 to 97) and more significantly the employees who will park in this lot generate 2 trips per space while existing patient/guest parking generates approximately 12 trips per space 9 (a function of them turning over 6 times per day). The other aspect of this change to parking is how the increased traffic volumes at the existing entry to the East Structure will be accommodated. Two South Frontage Road traffic scenarios were evaluated — Peak winter conditions based on holiday season traffic counts from 2006 (forecasted to 2015) and a summer condition using counts from 2013 (forecasted to 2015). This analysis concludes that in summer conditions the existing access improvements to the East Structure would provide acceptable traffic operations. Further, that during peak winter traffic conditions the interim Frontage Road improvements (described in the VVMC MP) will be necessary in order to provide acceptable traffic operations. A conceptual plan of this improvement is below. w — VV -MC Interim Access Cnneaptual flan Interim South Frontage Road access improvements (from VVMC MP) VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 18 Conditional Use Permit Application Based on this traffic analysis, VVMC proposes to implement changes to parking management concurrent with initiating construction of the West Wing. Over the course of the summer VVMC will finalize the design of the interim Frontage Road improvements and obtain necessary permits from CDOT. These interim improvements will be constructed this fall and be in place prior to winter. Employee Housing The West Wing expansion will require employee housing mitigation in accordance with the Town's Commercial Linkage ordinance. As per section 12-23-4, employee housing mitigation requirements for a re -development project are based on new employee generation resulting from the net increase in floor area of the project. Employee generation resulting from increased square footage is based on generation rates prescribed for specific land uses on Table 23-1 of the Code. The table does not, however, include a generation rate for hospitals, clinics or medical facilities. While the ordinance states that an applicant can submit competent evidence that the employee generation rates contained in Table 23-1 do not reflect the number of employees generated by the proposed development, the code does not specifically outline procedures for determining employee generation for land uses not listed on Table 23-1. As required by Chapter 23, an Employee Housing Plan for the West Wing expansion has been prepared and has been provided under separate cover. This plan includes an explanation of the methodology used to determine employee generation, employee generation from the West Wing and the mitigation method to be used by VVMC to meet the requirements of Chapter 23. This plan is under review by Town Staff and will be presented to the PEC for their review at a later date. Methodology to Calculate Employee Generation A wide variety of uses are found within a medical center and the intensity or number of employees for each use also varies considerably. For example, on a "per square foot basis" the number of employees needed to support food service, pharmacy, emergency department, imaging, medical clinics, administration and research functions vary significantly. As such it would be impractical to define a single ratio (i.e. X employees per 1,000 square feet), as is done for other land uses in Table 23-1. In lieu of researching square footage and employee data for multiple medical centers in order to determine a standard generation rate, a more site specific approach has been taken to defining employee generation for VVMC. This approach was taken for two reasons — evaluating existing conditions at VVMC will be a more accurate indication of employee conditions (than relying on data from other medical centers) and it is likely that VVMC will remain the only medical center use in Vail and as such establishing employee generation ratios to use for other development projects is not necessary. Basing employee generation on actual conditions at the Vail campus is the most accurate approach to understanding future conditions. The Employee Housing Report includes the following: VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 19 Conditional Use Permit Application • Summary of two underlying factors relative to the expansion of VVMC that will influence employee generation, • Baseline inventory of existing uses, square footage of space employees for all VVMC departments and all other organizations that operate at the campus, • Inventory changes/increases to square footage for each department and organization listed above, • Evaluation of specific expansion (and/or contraction or relocation) plans for each department and organization within the West Wing and how these plans impact employee generation, and • Summary of required employee mitigation and how mitigation will be provided for the West Wing expansion. On-site Housing Requirements The VVMC MP addresses employee housing and while specific numbers on new employees to be generated by the project were not provided, the VVMC MP did conclude that employee requirements are to be mitigated with off-site housing. Off-site housing is to be provided for two reasons. Residential uses were deemed to not be compatible with the institutional use of the medical center and it was determined that given the limited site area of the campus the best utilization of this land is for medical uses (and not residential uses). Section 12-23-6 of Chapter 23 stipulates that in cases where employee generation exceeds 1.25 employees, 50% of required mitigation must be provided on-site, provided however that at the sole discretion of the applicable governing body, "an exception may be granted based upon one of the following findings". Based on the response to findings below, a request for an exception to the on-site requirement is proposed. a. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the intent and purpose of the applicable zone district. Response N/A b. Implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method would be contrary to the goals of the applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive plan and the town's development objectives. Response A waiver to the on-site requirement is consistent with the VVMC Master Plan. This plan states that `for two reasons all required employee housing will be provided off-site. " These reasons include: • VVMC is an intensive, institutional land use. Introducing a residential land use on the site would not be compatible with the primary purpose of the site, which is to accommodate a hospital and relate medical uses. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 20 Conditional Use Permit Application WMC has very limited land area. The primary purpose of this site is to accommodate the medical center's existing needs as well as to retain opportunities for future expansion to the medical center. Introducing residential land use would conflict with the intended use of the site, limit future expansion opportunities and not be consistent with the town's comprehensive plan. c. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the site that prevents the implementation of the on-site unit mitigation method. Response WMC is a unique land use and an "extraordinary circumstance ". With VVMC's limited land area, introducing housing to the site would compete with the need to accommodate medical uses (now and in the future) and in doing so conflict with the Town's goal for this site to be used for medical purposes. In essence, any portion of the site that was to be used for housing would result in less site area available for future medical uses. This situation is exacerbated by existing covenant restrictions that limit VVMC's future expansion potential. d. The method of mitigation proposed better achieves the intent and purpose of this chapter and general and specific purposes of this title than the on-site mitigation unit method. Response Addressing employee impacts with off-site mitigation provides a more workable solution for addressing not only the goals of the housing regulations, but also the town's master plan goals for WMC. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 21 Conditional Use Permit Application V. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The same review criteria are used to review CUP and Development Plan applications. Below is a summary of how the proposed West Wing expansion conforms to these criteria. A summary of how the West Wing conforms to the VVMC MP follows. (1) Describe the precise nature of the proposed use and measures proposed to make the use compatible with other properties in the vicinity. Response The precise nature of the proposed use is described in Section IV. above. VVMC has been in place for 50 years and over this time compatibility of the hospital use with the surrounding residential and mixed use neighborhood has been established. There are no changes in uses proposed by this CUP that would adversely affect VVMC's compatibility with other properties in the vicinity. The design of the building expansion has been done in response to guidelines and parameters outlined in the Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (VVMC MP)that are intended to ensure building design that is responsive to the surrounding area. The proposal will result in a significant reduction of VVMC-generated traffic from West Meadow Drive, improving VVMC's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. (2) The relationship and impact of the use on development objectives of the Town. Response The West Wing expansion proposed by this CUP application represents the initial step in a +$100,000,000 expansion to the medical center. These expansion plans are outlined in the VVMC MP, a master plan that has been determined to be consistent with the Town's development objectives. The proposed use will result in many upgrades to the medical center that will provide a facility to allow for the upmost in quality health care to the Vail community and surrounding area. These improvements will also reinforce VVMC's ability to expand medical services or offer new services in the future and in doing so continue to provide quality health care to the community and to continue to provide significant economic benefits to the Town of Vail. (3) The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, and other public facilities and public facility needs. Response The proposed use will not affect any of the considerations outlined above. VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 22 Conditional Use Permit Application (4) The effect upon traffic, with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the streets and parking area. Response As outlined above, changes to parking management will result in a dramatic reduction of VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive. Improvements to the South Frontage Road will be made to ensure appropriate traffic flow at the entry to the East Structure. (5) The effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to surrounding uses. Response The VVMC MP includes a goal statement specific to the massing of the proposed expansion of the Medical Center. Specifically, a goal of the Master Plan is for "the massing (and scale) of the hospital expansion to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood". The Master Plan, while acknowledging that an additional floor will be added to the West Wing, provides guidelines and parameters for achieving this goal. In response to these guidelines the proposed design utilizes varied wall plans, building stepbacks and articulation, and building materials to minimize the scale and bulk of the building. WMC West Wing Expansion Page 23 Conditional Use Permit Application VI. APPENDIX West Wing Floor Plan Comparisons Construction Sequence Traffic Impact & Mitigation (Parking Swap) WMC West Wing Expansion Page 24 Conditional Use Permit Application N w WMC West Wing Expansion Page 25 Conditional Use Permit Application W a Vi N � a rr d' d� WMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application N s b � d A L � A 4 v k Y e I -.� N I' IL I 1 — u'1 11,1 a Vi N � a rr d' d� WMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application N b � d A L � A 4 k Y e x, G �Z4 i L) M. a a Vi N � a rr d' d� WMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application N b � d A L � A a Vi N � a rr d' d� WMC West Wing Expansion Page 26 Conditional Use Permit Application X w COS r VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 27 Conditional Use Permit Application A E-Llw COS r VVMC West Wing Expansion Page 27 Conditional Use Permit Application I c B Ia H I Q, c o 0 8 RF � i J LL U Z W U y W � O o F C4�Oc. NV I Q, c o 0 o my WMC West Wing Expansion Page 28 Conditional Use Permit Application Q, c my °dam;: cn in o F C4�Oc. o F WMC West Wing Expansion Page 28 Conditional Use Permit Application X W VVMC West Wing Expansion Conditional Use Permit Application N H � N vjD r T Page 29 SHEET SHEET NAME GENERAL G100.CUP I COVER SHEET SITE SURVEY TS101.CUP SITE SURVEY TS102.CUP SITE SURVEY TS103.CUP SITE SURVEY CIVIL C1.CUP OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN C2.CUP SITE AND GRADING PLAN C3.CUP AUTOTURN MOVEMENT EXHIBITS C4.CUP AUTOTURN MOVEMENT EXHIBITS ARCHITECTURAL SITE MARCH 12, 2015 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SHEET SHEET NAME AC100.CUP JARCHITECTURAL SITE LANDSCAPE L101.CUP LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A100.CUP FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL - ZONE A CUP A101.CUP FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL ONE - ZONE A & B A102.CUP FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL TWO - ZONE A&B A103.CUP FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL THREE - ZONE A&B A104.CUP FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL FOUR - ZONE A&B A105.CUP ROOF PLAN - ZONE A&B A200.CUP BUILDING, SITE ELEMENTS, ELEVATIONS A201.CUP BUILDING, SITE ELEMENTS, ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL E100.CUP ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN INTERIOR DESIGN: Gallun Snow 1920 Market Street, Suite 201, Denver, CO 80202 720.407.6002 BUILDING ENVELOPE: Building Consultants & Engineers, 1520 West Canal Court, Suite 240 Littleton, CO 80120 303.350.1000 Heery International Inc. 555 17th Street Suite 500, Denver, CO 80202-3219 720.946.0276 H I 1=1 302604 STRUCTURAL: Structural Consultants Inc. 3400 East Bayaud Avenue, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80209 303.399.5154 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, Inc. PLUMBING, LOW VOLTAGE: Cator Ruma & Associates, Co. 896 Tabor Street, Lakewood, CO 80401-4700 303.232.6200 ACOUSTICAL: D.L. Adams Associates _ - 1536 Ogden Street, - Denver, CO 80218 44qp ke Fj s a a r _ T ae - } CODE: CIVIL: Advanced Consulting Engineers, Inc. Martin/Martin ,9r 3900 South Wadsworth Boulevard, 225 Main Street, 4 PIN Suite 950, Unit C101 i 1 + � Jif Lakewood, CO 80235 Edwards, CO 81632 . dpi F 720.981.4150 970.926.6007 VICINITY MAP VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO. WEST WING \-VVMC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE: Lime Green Design, Inc. 900 East Louisiana Avenue, Suite 209, Denver, CO 80210 303.733.7558 design 7 M L0 6 L0 0 N N / / / / V S — V\C Ni SS- / VVMC WESTERL Y / 0 / PROPERTY LINE /� / \� /� 9.0' SA NI ARY C6 EWER MAIN (12), / & /� _ 9, X19' ST� / 100 -YR 0, FLOODPLAIN �/ 00)-8,)( -E_ Qo v / / g 0, 16, - / ST o 8.0' to / 0 1)`8X16' / / I STALLS (10-8 It , 6' ' w � X 1 STA TYPE 13 VALLEY INLET / \ \ W\, — fj \ 18„ NOp \ v \ I � FAG\ �TH '�\\ <<s \ I \ Iop J 9.0,TbI / \ 5 / \ \ ASPHALT (4)-9'X19' STALLS I \ 1 I S �� \ PATH J / \ � 1t CONNECTION - - INTERSTATE 70 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD k (R.O.W. VARIES) GAS MAIN - PRIMARY TELL—PHONE—,, S REMOVE SANITARY 'SS SEWER MANHOLE 060/ I c Tl RIM=8168.8 INV. =815614 I INTERS Y5 ATE 70 SOUTH LY I I IGHT—OFA WAY 4INE I ° d �• I U) \ ^4 I °\ I d 4 $ 4 A4 d ° � I \\ LL d 4 A4 FIRE HYDRANT LAT ALT — — PRC E I FISE/' OPTIC LINE (T)IPE � / A' r ��i i , Ir a - �G/ X o I I oo Do / - ° �VIICA I I , `90° q��� II I — 0 I OVERHEAD BUILDING 'll I I ' Al 10, 6. d 1 — I — © A A 5.0' CONIC. _. I I l -- a--__ d• \ SILT FENCE AT ALL \I✓/i - - -I i ' WALK <I /I • - / (HEATED) NEW MAIN ENTRANCE° • d DOWNSTREAM LIMITS �I / I ° I / OF DISTURBANCE (TYP);,- 0 9.0' -- _ - 0 _ E H\\ \ � ERs � \T HDPE / STAIRS VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER °I - �� RE: ARCH I I (� EHH TYPE 13 COMBO INLET / 9 I • (DOUBLE) / I 1 BUILDING OUTLINE (TYP.) I I N S MAIN 24.0' I I EH \ , ` �� _E- - -FL-FL - RETAINING WALL (4.5' MAX TYPE 13 COMBO INLET ° HEIGHT) WITH GUARDRAIL I - \ (DOUBLE) \� (RE: DETAIL THIS SHEET) I / - I SANITARY SEWER MAIN 8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RETAINING WALL (5 MAX Y / HEIGHT WITH GUARDRAIL ° I III 7 8 " CPP STORM \ Q l ) ls\ / STMH ��� PRIMARY WATER SERVICE I\ APPROXIMATE 4' SANITARY ' ° S COCAS/ON 'I ' ( REL CATER ` o — — � I _ -ls- - _ MONUMENT IGN� *A Round Inlets / %x- \S- - - - `� 30' ALONG a a I SEWER SERVICE II -15- - - - ��'���� � CENTERLINE a a DA ROUTE � a PATIO STARIS I - I I RE. ARCH. - - I NATURAL GAS SERVICE \ SKALL HUS 44 APARTMENTS �° �� 'a , a �II I 6' SANITARY SEWER SERVICE4" DIP DOMESTIC SS I / / a I I \� WATER SERVICE %, �� yp I I / ° ° d_ a 6" DIP FIRE LANDSCAPE I I I d d • ° ° • d IM ROVEMENTS - _ / �d , ° WATER ; I VICE ��a� \ ° ST ST RE: ARCH I SS / I , .I ``` I I I " OXYGEN SER NICE I �// El 11 [1d < • d. . • T.5 1 v� ,I \V—�—�S_\\\_`. l. ✓!V' a� a I ..u�.. _\\VIU/G. ❑ oil] ❑❑❑/,/ O • . a ,aa °da••d °A•° "°� •I a, a•d 4' CONCRETF_GUTTER � SITE AND GRADING NOTES: 1. TOTAL LOT SIZE FOR THE VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (WMC) IS APPROXIMATELY 4.1 ACRES. PER THE PLAT, THE SETBACKS AND ASSOCIATED BUILDABLE AREA FOR THE PROPERTY ARE DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 2. FOR FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS AND RIDGE HEIGHTS, RE: ARCHITECT. 3. EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL CONTINUE TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. 4. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL SHALL BE CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE WITH VENEER. 5. THERE ARE NO KNOWN GEOLOGIC / ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY. 6. PROPOSED STORM SYSTEM WILL BE SIZED FOR ON-SITE, 100 -YEAR FLOW RATES IN ADDITION TO DEWATERING FLOW RATES FOR A FUTURE PROJECT. 7. THE WMC HAS TWO INTERNAL WATER METERS AND ASSOCIATED SERVICE LINES. THE PRIMARY SERVICE AND METER IS LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND WILL REMAIN OPERATIONAL THROUGHOUT THIS PROJECT. THE SECOND IS LOCATED INSIDE THE WEST END OF THE BUILDING AND WILL BE RECONFIGURED INTERNALLY AS PART OF THE BUILDING EXPANSION AND RENOVATIONS. THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED EXTERIOR WATER METER VAULTS. 8. SNOW STORAGE SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED IN THE PARKING LOTS. REFER TO THE SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PACKAGE. 9. EXISTING ASPHALT AREA CONDITION SHALL BE EVALUATED FOR MAINTENANCE INCLUDING SEAL COATS AND CRACK SEALS. 10. THE PROPOSED ASPHALT SECTION IS EITHER 3" ASPHALT ON 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE OR 6" FULL DEPTH ASPHALT. LIGHT POLE ELECTRIC S-TRE�`TLIOH_T ANSFORMER (PU27C- zYPP_i \LET (T) 0 U rVl. 3MIvl IMr\ I I SEWER SERVICE EASTERL Y PROPERTY LINE w- --fV = --:1 — --��------SS------SS-- I i —__ =1V=� —1-- — __----SS--- --_\_E- =1— —_ —E--E-----E--- � -Ss-- S II �A SAL GAS" MAIN (TYPP) SILT FENCE AT AL DOWNSTREAM LIMITS � —E— — — — OF DISTURBANCE (TYP) 2 � ' PVC SANITAR SEWER MAl N 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. design project number HII-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL JANUARY USE PERMIT 16, 2015 item date C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL FEB. 09, 2015 C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL MAR. 11, 2015 sheet title OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN sheet number C1 CUP ■ This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by REJ checked by LM L rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. 7 M L0 6 L0 0 N N T_ / / / / / / / / / / / / 4kk�� / / AQ / 100 -YR / FLOODPLAIN STREAM BE PI / RE-VEGE- / CONSTRUI v� TYPE 13 VALLEY I N LET- � FLAG / 4 y� I ' S \� 4-M] — \SILT FENCE AT ALL yv OUTLET PROT CTIONI\IDOWNSTREAM LIMITS \ / I \ 'QF DISTURBANCE (TYP) 01 E \ EHH STORMWATER v \ \1S y QUALITY UNIT \\ I Y0001* / \ - - (CONNECT TO �\ EH EX. STORM PIPE) \ \ I LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED W/ T.O.V \ I I 18 " CPP STORM \ �Q ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR c, \ STORMWATER QUALITY UNIT \ l` v (ADDITIONAL SURVEY � mss, / SILT FENCE AT ALL \ � \ DOWNSTREAM LIMITS F INFORMATION REQUIRED TO \ VERIFY ELEVATION OF DISTURBANCE (TYP) REL CATE' \ CONSTRAINTS) SRVH \\ - - MONUMENT IG' (APPROXIMATE �� - -1S - - - -\-\ C00 O LOCATION) \�VA IP n u 4" DIP DOMESTIC 7�, j� WATER SERVICE 6" DIP FIRE WATER VICE �SS-- 4' CONCRETF._GUTTER � NEW 42" HIGH GUARD RAIL. EMBED BASE OF RAIL INTO CONC. CONCRETE RETAINING WALLW SANDSTONE CA AND VEENER WEEP HOLE SUPPORT BRACKET SLOPE SIDEWALK Y" PER FOOT NEW 42" HIGH GUARD RAIL. MATCH EXISTING SANDSTONE CAP AND VEENER MATCH EXISTING 1. RETAINING WALL DESIGN BY HEERY AND IS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. SITE RETAINING WALL SECTION N.T.S. LIGHT POLE - ELECTRIC S-TRE�7__L H_T _� ANSFORMER (PU�\- zYPP1_ INLET PROTECTION 0 SITE AND GRADING NOTES: 1. TOTAL LOT SIZE FOR THE VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (WMC) IS APPROXIMATELY 4.1 ACRES. PER THE PLAT, THE SETBACKS AND ASSOCIATED BUILDABLE AREA FOR THE PROPERTY ARE DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. 2. FOR FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS AND RIDGE HEIGHTS, RE: ARCHITECT. 3. EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL CONTINUE TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. 4. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL SHALL BE CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE WITH VENEER. 5. THERE ARE NO KNOWN GEOLOGIC / ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD AREAS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY. 6. PROPOSED STORM SYSTEM WILL BE SIZED FOR ON-SITE, 100 -YEAR FLOW RATES IN ADDITION TO DEWATERING FLOW RATES FOR A FUTURE PROJECT. 7. THE WMC HAS TWO INTERNAL WATER METERS AND ASSOCIATED SERVICE LINES. THE PRIMARY SERVICE AND METER IS LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND WILL REMAIN U rVl. 3/11v1 I/Ar\ I SEWER SERVICE INTERSTATE 70 SOUTH `v`y �v� I FRONTAGE ROAD (R'.O.W. VARIES) GA� MAIN 16, 61MARY T�­LEPHON� \ S I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ REMOVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 60/TIMI I \ \ I INV.=8131 56 `X_ 70 SOUTH Y \ I \ I \ l�l<T-OFA WAY SINE X \ 1 � 44 I / d -4 A 4 \y 4 A4 E •. \ �- / d \ l FIRE HYDRANT PRC E I ° • ° ° __ I d• • ° • e d I° • A 4 � SANITARY SEWER MAIN 11 ----- - - -- -- — �I SKALL HUS APARTMENTS IEASTERL Y PROPERTY LINE vv- --fV =\\ --:1 — —-��------SS------SS-— I i —__ T7V _\-- — _E___ --\S-- -- \ E- =1— L _ —__ — -S\— S E_—__—E--- II _ _ = _ ASA ORAL GAS MAIN (TYP) SILT FENCE AT AL STV =— —E----_ — — DOWNSTREAM LIMITS� —E— — — — OF DISTURBANCE (TYP) 2 � ' PVC SANITARY SEWER MAl OPERATIONAL THROUGHOUT THIS PROJECT. THE SECOND IS LOCATED INSIDE THE WEST END OF THE BUILDING AND WILL BE RECONFIGURED INTERNALLY AS PART OF THE BUILDING EXPANSION AND RENOVATIONS. THERE ARE NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED EXTERIOR WATER METER VAULTS. 8. SNOW STORAGE SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED IN THE PARKING LOTS. REFER TO THE SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PACKAGE. 9. EXISTING ASPHALT AREA CONDITION SHALL BE EVALUATED FOR MAINTENANCE INCLUDING SEAL COATS AND CRACK SEALS. 10. THE PROPOSED ASPHALT SECTION IS EITHER 3" ASPHALT ON 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE OR 6" FULL DEPTH ASPHALT. N 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. design project number HII-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers e0000" MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL JANUARY USE PERMIT 16, 2015 item date C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL FEB. 09, 2015 C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL MAR. 11, 2015 sheet title SITE & GRADING PLAN sheet number C2.CUP This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by REJ checked by LM L rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. WB -40 GENERAL DELIVERIES — \_ —w— -LAND SWAP LIMIT �L 90' FROM W�PROPETY_LI`E / / 7' \ A, I 7sl 143 / f / I v v y Us_ 4 vy A V vv A yy 71 Cd\ —E — E, Ell \ t \\\ WB -62 ENTRY INTO SITE w- _-- _ ALL- _ T EASL SND SWAP LIMY FROM W T�Pl20Il l�S'L— —, Z LINE - I . —E— % % I� I 01 E \y I � v / — \ I I I I I I I \ SS WB -40 OXYGEN DELIVERY NOTE: HATCHED LOCATION INVOLVES ONE MOVEMENT BACK AND FORTH TO POSITION AT THIS LOCATION f II TAOSWAPDMIr 90 FROM WST�PROPElLINE _ / / \ \•• m - - _- i�� \ - / TV E A I o � •.. //ice / Tv V �/ � I '• �� I` ol IL �i IS_,y-,yv�-- - — x E— / � I F WB -62 MRI DELIVERY AND EXIT FROM SITE NOTE: HATCHED AREA IS DROP OFF LOCATION OF MRI IVA —W �AI_ -1PND SWAP LIMB 90' FROM PROPCTQL1NE / I E \ _ c` v -7v A tvv Amos `vim vv v�4 E_ 00, X I _ _ V A Eta00.1 ✓ V/ m IS— C/ I Ss kk J, I I N GENERAL NOTE: ALL MOVEMENTS SHOWN OUTSIDE THE LAND SWAP LIMITS 30 15 0 30. 60 SCALE: 1"=30' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET I I Ss ------- N A - CALL V I I 2—BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. This smashes is the p,WaMorHren Internatianel, I,w. and! Ferry IntentionalInc. recces all none Mareln,InclWIn9mPyn9Ns. Itme onlybaun InamannermnsistenlwMHeery International It right' cards Hear, International, Inc. is pmvMing an"I ter the sued is Rapcl Itlemlfiea or mroneE W brain Meta ria thel It may net ba used tp any other pumosa trawl sit the egress w,illen agrmment of, and wmuensation le, Heery Incrmatonal Inc. project number H I I-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers /MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCE17 ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTINMARTIN.COM seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL JANUARY USE PERMIT 16,2015 item date C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL FEB. 09, 2015 C U.P. RESUBMITTAL MAR. 11. 2015 sheet title AUTOTURN MOVMENTS EXHIBIT sheet number CICUP drawn by REJ checked by LML Copyright® 3013 by Hee, Inlematenal Inc. all aside reematl. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL 513E THIS SHEET MEASURES 30142• M L0 6 L0 0 N N T_ FIRE TRUCK (ENTRY MOVEMENT) 000 / / / / /y - \ — — — — VALET I PAR G A EA J AND SWAP LIMIT---, ROM W/�S \, T�PF�PE O LINE — i v — — fiber iF7 \\ - \ \ \\\ —bay � _SS /- - -�S--_ _--W----�--ink C / / / / y I M / / / / FIRE TRUCK (EXIT MOVEMENT) —W— — 4 \ VALET PARI G A EA Ems— -AND SWAP LIMIT ROM W_SkPP ---TY LINE GENERAL NOTE: C • 41 i SS — — ` P\ N ALL MOVEMENTS SHOWN OUTSIDE THE LAND SWAP LIMITS 30 15 0 30 60 SCALE: 1 "=30' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET CALL V 1 1 2—BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. design project number HII-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL JANUARY USE PERMIT 16, 2015 item date C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL FEB. 09, 2015 C.U.P. RESUBMITTAL MAR. 11, 2015 sheet title AUTOTU RN MOVMENTS EXHIBIT sheet number �C4CUP ■ drawn by REJ checked by LML Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" ---------------- ------------ FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL - ZONE A CUP 1/9' -1'-0, LINE LEGEND = NEW BUILDING FOOT PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This document ie tre Vo eM of HI Intana4mal, Inc. aro Heary Infomatbnal Inc. retain, all rights mu"em, including mpPgher. It may on" ureal In a mal consiaronl wim Heery International Inc.'a rgM16 Mile Heery International, Inc. is providing services mr me specific project ialanoted or command to herein a emdmmma flual It may no W used for any other purpose evxptwft I. express... agreement of, and comysnaafbn N, Heart Inmrnmional Inc. project number HII-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCH 12, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 SCALE: 1/8" =1' 0" N (I sheet title FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL - ZONE A CUP sheet number A100.CUP drawn by Author checked by Checker Cool Ch .1u IS Henry lntermormal, Inc. allnl reservetl. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL 512E THIS SHEET MEASURES yul.' 00 0 co T Q N N lM"J T� (EXCEPTION: NEW DATA CENTER- INTERIOR ONLY FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL ONE - ZONE A&B 1/8" = 1'-0" LEGEND =NEW BUILDING FOOT PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. HEERY • � project number H I 1-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCH 12, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" (I FLOOR LEVEL A & B sheet title PLAN - ON E - ZONE sheet number Al 01 CUP ■ drawn by Author checked by Checker Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" Lf') O O LO N T Q N N lM"J T� FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL TWO - ZONE A&B CUP 1/8" =1'-0" LEGEND NEW BUILDING FOOT PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. HEERY • � project number H I 1-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JANUARY 26, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" (1) sheet title FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL TWO - ZONE A&B sheet number Al 02.CUP drawn by Author checked by Checker Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" I 1 1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL THREE - ZONE A&B CUP V8" - 1' C'. 1 r 1 N m 1 1 - 1 ■ PROPERTY LINE LEGEND 0 = NEW BUILDING FOOT PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This document ie tre Vo eM of HI Intana4md, Inc. aro Heary Infomatbnal Inc. retain, all rights mu"em, including mpPgher. It may on" ureal In a mal consiaront wim Heery International Inc.'a rgM16 Mile Heery International, Inc. is providing eervices mr me specific project idenWed or courred to herein a exammons theme. It may no Ca used for any offer purpose evxptwft I. express... apmesm .of, and commerciatbn N, Heart Im.mcdional Inc. project number HII-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JANUARY 26, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 SCALE: 1/8" =1' 0" N (I sheet title FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL THREE - ZONE A&B sheet number Al 03.CUP drawn by Author checked by Checker Cool Ch .1u IS Henry lntermormal, Inc. allnl reservetl. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL 512E THIS SHEET MEASURES yul.' WE 7 N O 6 0 N N M 1 1 1 1 1 1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL FOUR - ZONE A&B CUP 1/8" = V-0" 1 1 1 1 1 1 LEGEND NEW BUILDING FOOT PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEERY • � project number IN I VAI L VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT date JANUARY 26, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" (1) sheet title FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL FOUR - ZONE A&B sheet number Al 040cup This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by Author checked by Checker rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. WE 7 rl- LC) O co L0 T O N N lM"J T� 1 1 1 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. HEERY • � project number H I 1-1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCH 12, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" (1) sheet title ROOF PLAN -ZONE A&B sheet number Al 05.CUP drawn by Author checked by Checker Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" OEM 7 N LO Lf') N 0 N 00 co MTL PANEL SYSTEM #3 T.O. MECH SHAFT $ 8215.00 T.O. STL DECK �.95 I MTL COLUMN PANEL #3 MTL PANEL SYSTEM #1 MANSARD ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING CENTRAL BUILDING STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING CENTRAL BUILDING LEVEL 4 8192.16 STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING CENTRAL BUILDING LEVEL 3 �JU �JLJL L�D 8192.22 a❑ ❑❑ a . D D DaD aD ❑ METAL PANEL SYSTEM #1 � - - - - - � - � ❑ � L t I ,_ tEl _ _ ❑ ASHLAR STONE TO ]H[ MATCH EXISTING , LEVEL 2 - EE D ❑ 8165.50 CORTEN TO D T1 MATCH ❑ EXISTING LEDD D = 00000 n00000 - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IIII - LEVEL 1 LIELILI D �B-B-D 8151.50 EIEEILI_ I F11 oinmiiniinii niinulnllli0000000i oouu0000000000000000 00000000000m000000mo❑000000000000000000�m000000c00000000 DD DDDDDD DD nCIDC1ooDDD CI CI DDD D ❑ �00000��00�0��000�0 ��0�00��0�0����00�00 D U—i 4 — _ _ _ o�o�oo BASEMENT 8137.50 L EXISTING GRADE OFF -RED STUCCO SYSTEM TO E5 LIGHTING MATCH EXISTING CENTRAL BUILDING 0 T.O. MECH SHAFT 8215.00 TO STL DECK 8204.95 LEVEL 4 8192.16 LEVEL 3 8192.22 - _LE_VEL 2 $ 8165.50 LEVEL 1 8151.50 BASEMENT $ 8137.50 CUP- SOUTH ELEVATION ZONE A a METAL PANEL SYSTEM #1 J ASHLAR STONE TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN CORTEN BROW TO MATCH EXISTING l❑ MTL PANEL SYSTEM #1 BACK OF MANSARD METAL PANEL SYSTEM #2 METAL PANEL SYSTEM #3 CORTEN TO MATCH EXISTING CEMENT PANEL BD. SYSTEM BEYOND EXISTING CORTEN TO REMAIN EXISTING MTL ROOF TO REMAIN EXISTING EFTS TO REMAIN !IIS I � ::�]L��L� D L= o EJ[] JLJ 0 lTIE: j � r - �L��-JJ_ J -0)[11=L LEI I IE = ----------- _J I MEMO E E I I MEN MOM E10 7m i I am— 0 0 1!0!7 11 V -al METEL PANEL SYSTEM #2 ASHLAR STONE TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING BRICK TO REMAIN EXISTING EFIS TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN El �I ii I fel T)LI��.. I k==j EXISTING E EXISTING ASHLAR STONE ZFIS TO REMAIN TO REMAIN CUP- EAST ELEVATION ZONE A 1/8"=11-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION HEERY � • � project number HII-1302604 VAI L VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCH 12, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" sheet title BUILDING, SITE ELEMENTS, ELEVATIONS sheet number A2 CUP ■ 0 This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by Author checked by Checker rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright ©2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. r N ti Lf) N O N 00 M CUP- NORTH ELEVATION ZONE A 1/8" = 1'-0" T.O. ELEVA $ 8219.00 CEMENT PAIS BD.SYSTEM nr-ft AI -AIT nA AIM nn ROOF MTL PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING ^I -K 1T11A1 MI III MIK I/ CUP- WEST ELEVATION ZONE A 118" =1'-0" IVIG I h1L rY1114CL J I J 1 CIVI tt I MTL PANEL SYSTEM #3 MTL PANEL SYSTEM #2 ASHLAR STONE TO MATCH EXISTING V IJI.JV T.O. MECH SHAFT 8215.00 T.O. STL. DECK 8204.95$ LEVEL 44 8192.16 LEVEL 3 8192.22 LEVEL 22 8165.50 8151. BASEMENT 8137.50 19 M co NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I HEERY • � project number HII-1302604 VAI L VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCH 12, 2015 item date RESUBMITTAL 03/12/2015 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" sheet title BUILDING, SITE ELEMENTS, ELEVATIONS sheet number A201CUP ■ This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by Author checked by Checker rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright© 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. This document is the prq eM of Heery mtanaM1mal, Inc. and Fere, International Inc. riman, all rights therein, including dep rghts. It may on" used In a manner consistent with Hear, International Ins.'a rights; Mile Heery International, Inc. is pmvidbg services bar the specilic project idanWed or retinal to herein a extensions flumb. It may no be used for any other purpose miceptwfh the exprnsa.1. aproom .of, and cmmeanaatbn N, Heart Intranational Inc. AIL VALLEY EDICAL CENTER )NDITIONAL USE PERMIT WEST MEADOW DRIVE L, CO ier's project number 'NER'S PROJECT NUMBER sultants/construction managers )NDITIONAL iE PERMIT seal/signature MARCH 12, 2015 GURRENI'l M122M55 CI IP 3.19.9n1Is sheet title RCHITECTURAL ITE sheet number kC100.CUP drawn by Author checked by Checker CoWrryht ® 2013 by Harry International. Inc. all rights resel WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SRE THIS SHEET MEASURES yiTs 2' ---W-- / TSF -- _ — —---- TV -TV--a�N-----_--_�y__- W ------ W _ --W_- • \ ��i � -cam "'�- � -ud- - - - /'� 167 HS -150i a a- ��_ --__ -__ - �— ___ _ _------ --- 17 4 CSI HS -31000 n v -E_ _ ST - / O --------- -__. --- E -----E--- __ E----- T ST ST I n \I ST ST , • / �// \ ST ST ST °WORN AREAS OF TC ESTSDG OF T ° \\ w ° PARKING LOT TO BE CLEARED AND O GRUBBED. TILL IN COMPOST AND RESEED. j LOW BARRIER TO BE INSTALLED. �, / ° / 16 HS ACCESS E� NT j 9 RA 1 ® ® ° ° 6 CSI 2 PA / -- 7 PPS , ° i PA ' I I -CDI/ - r - o ° ° IN 2 TYP. 18 HIS ----------------- 4 RA 5 TYP. .\sr< � 3 PPS I , �, CD - I ST ' 1 ---------- 1 SNS ' \�2 TYP. � 1 JCA - �AUU %� 1 •�• ; - fix.::- ,.. � / I I 5 _ � \ 2 TY - ST sr ST FE —HH] WMC WALKWAY TO BE HEATED. 0 V \ PROPOSED EH `�� ���-----E--�--E 9 RA � —_E - 1 % I 4 17 PPS A D D I T 1 0 N -�I 3—PT 4 ti ,X �� i 0 AC 10 PM ° �� "=� 7 RLE 1 --- - 35 BBA 11 SB 1 o© o, 3 1 PPH ' W 100 HHH 4 A TRI NG 10 SB 0 IGHT 1 q � -- � 7 RLE 2�:33 BBA 1 � 11 PT 11 HS 42 BBA-- ❑ 2 --r-_ r-- — s— — — -- --E _ — — 16 HHH TV -E r SS BENCH _ SS — t 0 0 -- i� - - - , PPH - - ----- i-- _ -- r -S,,-40 ARS W-- tiY 7 RLE_ 10 M - ,T T --E Ss 'S— --V✓-_ _ @ Ewa ----E— -6-,PT- --E— _ — E__--- E --- \ i — 1N-___ — ----- \ _ SS 17 CSI — ^- E-----E— V Ss 52 AIJU w----- ----- --T�-_\E_ T, 3 PPH S -- ss ---- _ -ss --- --SS------ ss-_ —__ — TV--- TV--__f V--- E---- TE-- TV- TV ----E -- —_ T --__- --TV-- E— r ---E- 0 10 20 40 Scale: 1 " = 20' PLANTING NOTES 1. STAKE ALL NEW TREE LOCATIONS BASED ON THESE PLANS. OBTAIN ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND OWNER'S REP. APPROVAL OF LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 2. PLANT QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR BY REVIEWING PLANTING PLAN SYMBOLS. 3. PLANT AND EDGING LAYOUT SHALL TAKE PRIORITY OVER IRRIGATION VALVE BOX LOCATIONS. INSTALLED VALVE BOXES WHICH CONFLICT WITH ACCEPTED PLANT AND EDGING LAYOUT SHALL BE MOVED TO A LOCATION BETWEEN PLANTS AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN A HEALTHY STATE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE TO PLANT MATERIAL DUE TO NEGLECT BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 5. PROJECT INCLUDES EXTENSIVE IRRIGATION AND UTILITY SYSTEMS MANY OF WHICH ARE CLOSE TO THE FINISHED SURFACE. VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO PLANTING. REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO ARCHITECT. 6. ALL SHRUB, PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS ARE TO BE PREPARED AS CONTINUOUS BEDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 7. ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER BEDS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN WITH A MINIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE. 8. ALL SHRUB BEDS TO BE MULCHED WITH MINERAL MULCH (MATCH EXISTING) OVER WEED BARRIER FABRIC. 3" MIN. DEPTH. ALL PERENNIALS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVERS TO BE MULCHED WITH WOOD MULCH, 2" DEPTH, NO WEED BARRIER FABRIC (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) , RE: SPECS. SEPARATE WOOD AND MINERAL MULCHED AREAS WITH STEEL EDGER. 9. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANT LEGEND ABBR. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME B&B, STAKE & GUY TREES B&B, STAKE & GUY PPH PICEA PUNGENS'HOOPSII' HOOPSII SPRUCE PA POPULUS X ACUMINATA LANCELEAF COTTONWOOD PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN CONT. SHRUBS CONT. AAA AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA SASKATOON SERVICEBERRY CSI CORNUS SERICEA'ISANTI' ISANTI DOGWOOD JAC JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS ALPINE CARPET ALPINE CARPET JUNIPER PM PHYSOCARPUS MONOGYNUS NATIVE NINEBARK PPS POTENTILLA FRUITICOSA DAVURICA'PRAIRIE SNOW' PRAIRIE SNOW POTENTILLA RA RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT RLE ROSA'LIVIN' EASY' LIVIV EASY ROSE SNS SPIREA NIPPONICA'SNOWMOUND' SNOWMOUND SPIREA SB SYRINGA X BLOOMERANGE PURPLE REBLOOMING LILAC GRASSES/PERENNIALS ARS AJUGA REPTANS GREEN CARPET BUGLE AUU ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI KINNIKINNICK BBA BOUTELOUA GRACILIS'BLONDE AMBITION' BLONDE AMBITION GRASS HS HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUE AVENA GRASS HHH HEMEROCALLIS'HAPPY RETURNS' DWARF YELLOW DAYLILY MML MISCANTHUS SINENSIS'MORNING LIGHT' MORNING LIGHT MAIDEN GRASS SYMBOLS LEGEND MINERAL MULCH (MATCH EXISTING) OVER WEED BARRIER FABRIC EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED FS NOTES 1Q EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 2EXISTING TREE (INCLUDING DRIPLINE) TO BE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED 3 SIGN 4 WALL, RE: CIVIL 5 REPAIR DAMAGE TO EXISTING SOD AS NEEDED SIZE COMMENTS 8' HT. B&B, STAKE & GUY 2" CAL. B&B, STAKE & GUY 2" CAL. B&B, STAKE & GUY 4' CLUMP B+B 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. 1 GAL. CONT., SPACE 12" O.C. 1 GAL. CONT., SPACE 4' O.C. 1 GAL. CONT. 1 GAL. CONT. 1 GAL. CONT., SPACE 12" O.C. 1 GAL. CONT. PERENNIALS IRRIGATED SOD This document is the properly of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. HEERY project number H I I-1302604 VAI L VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAI L, CO owner's project number OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER consultants/construction managers seal/signature issued for date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JANUARY 26, 2015 item date CUP RESUBMITTAL FEB. 9, 2015 RESUBMITTAL FOR ITEM MAR. 12, 2015 RESUBMrrTAL MAR. 17, 2015 0 A' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN sheet title sheet number r. H P ■ drawn by AD checked by ME Copyright© 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" . ..... . ... _ -- -..-- - - . { NOTES: - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: . . 1) DAVE 1F. SiiRVEY: DECEMBER 2 2413 &. JANUARY '24 2 9) BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION 13 NOT PLATTED. PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION . . t IMPROVEMENTS 'ON THIS .PROPERTY. TOWN OF VAIL SHOULD BE CONTACTED FOR CORRECT LOTS E, ,F AND 10, VAIL VILLAGE, SECOND FILING, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF . I 2) LAND TITLE, GUARANTEE COMPANY . POLICY NO. VC50032297 DATED 12/5/11, 'BUILDING SETBACK INFORMATION. RECORDED MARCH 25, 1963 UNDER RECEPTION. NO. 97199; COUNTY OF EAGLE, n�s-rATE 7o ALONG WITH NOS. VC50032296 AND.VC50032298-2 DATED 12/6/71 WERE : STATE OF COLORADO. . . I - . • I I - RELIED UPON' FOR ALL TITLE Anil. EASEMENT INFORMATION, 10) ,THESE PARCELS MAY BE AFFECTED BY. A RIGHT'-• OF -WAY €SEE€? RECORDED IN . sour;"► FRONTAcr € OAD �o�rtt ::i ..-:. _' . BOOK. ,127, PAGE 486. ATED JUNE, 1941 T4 TNI; STATE OF COLORADO AS . A ..-.. . xrAce' .. 3} .NOTICE: ACCCiRIikNG Td COLC}RADO LAW YOU MusT COMMENCE ANY' LEGAL VNB BUILDING, ACCORDING Td THE PLAT. RECO K. . R4gp ` - --�_ . •' LA RECORDED, DECEMBER .15, 1989, IN� 8OO . _ ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS . ` PUBLIC 'HIGHWAY. THE DESCRIPT1t3N CONTAINS TOO I ANY ERRORS To 519 AT PAGE 815: COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE. OF COLORADO. . AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT. MAY ANY . ACCURATELY PLOT. ' I SUBJECT' I ACTION . BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE 'COMMENCEf . MORE - . SITE t � THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATt6N SHOWN 0 11) LOTS E & F AND VNB PROPERTY ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS. CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF . , .. . ' € srA ,4 - HERII . . ' AGREEMENT Ri`C{3RfJEi3 AUGUST 24. 1989 IN BOOK. 512 AT PAGE 290. . `� eIo i R e€r 4) BASIS OF ELEVATION: NGS CONTROL POINT "SPRADDLE" .ELEVATION=8287.0' (NAVE} 88} 12) LOTS E & F AND VNB PROPERTY ARE SUBJECT TQ THE TI=RMS, CONt3fTIC}NS Alp PROVISIONS OF SURVl�'QR'S- CERTIFICATE . " I AGREEMENT RECORi3ED AUGUST 1'91.. 1931 IN BOOK 566 AT PAGE 322. . I1. I 5} TOPOGRAPHY -HASLET ON FIELD MEASUREMENTS:. CONTOUR INTERVAL = i' . c 13 LOTS E & F ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS' CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS. OF BLANKET EASEMENT To Vail Clinic, Inc., A Colorado Kori -Profit Corporation-. _ a { 5 _ 6) . BASIS OF BEARINGS: A LANE BETWEEN FQUNE? iOI�iUMENTS AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF } _ . _ . _ : _ .- . , _ _ _ _. _ . _ _ M _ _ - _ - . _ . _ �: _ . _ _ _ _ _ LOTS 8 & 9; VAIL 'VILLAGE, SECOND FILING AND ' THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION RECORDED APRIL 14, 2006 IAT RECEPTION # 200609614. . . . . a sari � . . 6. T5S. RBOW; 6TH P,M. HAVING A BEARING dF "i�f82`i2�16 E. This is to; certify that this map or plat and the .survey ern which it is based were made its -�-. I ��- � 14) LOTS E & FARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF HOLY CROSS ECLECTRIC ASSOCIATION RIGHT-�Q1'-- ocaor0anee with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title • VICINITY .MAP 7)` QISCEPANCIES EXSIST BETWEEN RECORDED PLATS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOE? T SUrve s. 'c€intl . establisLted ciricf ado ted b " ALTA' and LISPS, clnd includes Items 1 1 b . - EIEAVIkt . 1987 IN BOOK 455 AT PAGE "321. . Y J Y A Y,2,5,7u,8&1 COLORADO i3EF'ARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS IRQJECT'.I 70-2 i 183, FOUND AT BOOK WAY EASEMENT RECORDED' JANUARY 22 0 T5S. R8€3W { ). of Table A thereof Vt .. ieil� wt�rlc v+ns completed on 1%4/12. - C I I NaT To SCALE 219, PAGE 4.41. WHERE SUCH. DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, ACCEPTED PROPERTY i a-15} VNB PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 10, 1989 IN BOOK � t#��! ''�,�s LINE REFLECTS THE RECORDED PLAT'.11 '] ; 49. T PAGE 141. �•�...� ,,� i w . • . . . 13 �` 8} ALL BURIED UiILMES SHOWN HEREON . WERE LOCATED BY OTHERS, EAGLE VfkL-LEY URVEY1NG 16). THIS RVEY AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED I1EREdN IS THE PROPERTY OF '. 5tan Ho fe t � { . cp S - - . i �`'� - ASSUMES. NO RESPONSIBIL"fY FOR THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE EAGLE LEY SURVEYING, INC, AND IS INTENDED FOR, THE SOLE USE OF THE Colorodo �1 9�� et .. . "1� LOCATES SH01NN. ORIGINAL LIENT ONLY. ANY USE OF OR 'TRANSFER TO OTHERS IS . PROHIBITED. 9( SMDG: Bate.?,�,�f,.4 - INDICATES N MONUMENT \`\ ~''++..,,.,...ti`'``p O DICA .ES FOL! D MONL1 EN AS DESCRIBED HEREON 0 INDICATES SEF #I REBAR & 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAT', L.S #2&598 ` v` = DISCREPANCY FOUND � PAGE INDEX: DF? " �,� qa A INDICATES SEI` NAIL & 3/4 BRASS WASHER, LS #26598 \ �r '" : t �4- -IN--LEGAL; ESCRIPTION .. � . U �L TTY , ' : � (HATCHER- AREA; SSE N.Qt #7) . .X PAGE 1: . EAWEMENT �- a,, �. BOUNDARY & MONUMENTATIQ�d, BASIS Lar BEARINGS, VICINITY MAP, EASEMENT DIMENSIONS, EASEMENT CURV TA8 E .\ 30: ' ""' Z. .. .� BUILDING DIMENSIONS & TIES . . E L r... EDGE dF . ASPHALT CikIVE: � X " . 1.ASPHALT CURVE DELTA ANGLE ARC LENGTH \ ".0• " --- ..� PAGES 2 & 3: . C1 1 S 55'15" CALC 13:89. CALL „. \\ � '`\ .''� TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITIES, TREES & LANDSCAPE FEATURES ca 35.3f3'3'1 " CALC 11 s.3fi' CALC TRACT .-- - _ _ .� _ , _ FOUND #5 REBAR & , 1/2" OT 2, BLOCK i" _,,,: !, ALUMINUM CAP, tS#f 14109 �- ,' _"` ,__� (S30*15•E 0.61' FROM CORNER) VAILAIONSHEAD, SECOND FILING � --- --- � •,._.:.. ---- �.:°�`._ a EASEMENT LINE TABLE . . `"`�-.`_"- - L- ./ ---_ ! .~.L ----- � `'-: : � . _. _ _ ,, - .`"` " _` __.:- -".. _--.� FOUI,ID #4 REBAR & f �`�� �� LINE BEARING DISTANCE FOUND #4 REBAR & 20.0' �'"`�---•. 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAI' FOUND #4 REBAR & b<.5' `! ��'y� �:\ L1 N49.1t161fl'E 28.7'2' 1 1/2 ALUMINUM CAP/ � ...,� �- LS# 16627 1 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP PEDESTRIAN & - ..� f 5#.16827 ~ter.• '�"`� LS /16827 UTILITY EASEMENT � i�OSPITAL CONCRETE WALK \ ''�� V. '- L2 SgB`54'48"W 5q.96' ;>•. `` "`�'-- ., ,.� ...� # I PARKING ,� .'r� "`� L3 N85'Sq `Oq"w 53.59' ��. - �- --. S7g• 4 i 3 59 .... `" , .,".` -_ -- # ••. &='� 7`�$� 5" . "�` --.. L4 536•g9'I7"E 44.5p' ! PROPERTY �'�=s ;_ .��¢ " 84 A "`,, ASP€ALT IIRIVE {B5Q9,P328) t " --�. I5 N8553'25"1'1 .3.88' f . LII�IE . �g.5'�#'# 3' " ' w`` ��:; `' `` `"�..,� E ` �•$$ T) S85'24'3i"E ._ ��� T 22 6* _ ' �-'1 t � "���..�iQ ""` --.^: __b Ls . NC14 CIS 3S"E 22.'.45` a '-- �, �..t----- [CALC) S85'31' n 1()0.29 (PLAT) �� � - GAfiAG£ `2'36'52" . �_. � %I ���.�Q ,�' . `" ,� -- L7 N85'53'25"ICY 6.31' .\" . ° :2 -� �� `- 00 34# (MFAs) I '�,' �- �-ti ENTRANCE r�}3.32 �� v. I I. j� � / . --� f T _ ' .�� - 1 V.�' "`rr i 7 �N7LG. �••� .+s ...,,, - '� VA€\AVE 1. ` Y r .. : f: - i - - �'•""`" ,,.� . L8 SD4`06 35"W 39:82 . - ©.. .. .,_ �v-4u - /' . _ . 43 513 1 .]` ' �.... ` f=92.1 Q: - . ,.. � .z2' (Rl�r � `3"` r £I�ITRANCE UT1LlTY w=x,v:. L9 N79'41'13'hW iS.QQ' , n 1€VE3L)D TIE ,. ._ rr EA5£I�iEIIT M1y TRACT A "' _.. . 57,07• I . 20.a � .< 4fi.10 � � > . BRG= S82 38 22: E (CALC) .ET�INING WALL (L�r) F 31` - . L1cT . .Ns5 5s n5'w 17.8L7 C.Cre��.� g�1 a `"' "` .- i~---•�- """" - } `' I ST' f . > - - JUL w7':lCiPt.IS�-1...�a,;,r,-xxr•� •.+.�T �' s ._....,,,,• .,.� _,,,� _ r "`e'.'".. •-••..... irk ' ' �`, a /~ �~• �.�.FiF/lot_ . LI 1 s0� 04 55 w 1O,st3 -_.- - N 1 s•4s os w n i �8 f `i'� }- HOLY GF2QSS '- .. . .. TEN --X183.97. --- ,6 \ 1 L12 N85.55 U5'YY 59.70' �" "'. 3(1.44 TIE) - - -,.,.� t t `� ``- �.,4 A� p ; Y :., , =. � ..; - . . , . ELEC. ASSO ., CbhICR' TE . ` . S�� �.. ` L13 St14 ti4 55"W 4,1.$€3 �, . u ___ : , :S 7. '�� ( �. `:.: ., Q �... I . �: h ; s • : P RKING ' - r.:..,.,:r., t 12 .. -'", c , � a , _. 14 , O� EASEL i A •. .. - . , . `` 26 ~-:. s$s 9s as 59.7a .-,rte_, - s.4 � TOP BAc M t: , 851'1:€'849 M #� . - WC}19C3: T1E 1-- : (CAC F ,.\. -a, L15 sc4-€ 4 'W .. 1. s . .: ASPFiAI ,. ) .. - C 77. CUR® , �: :. TDP BACK ~-- 55 2 5 �1+ , z> ._..- .� L1t3 ., . 9 t ,. SEE PAGE 2 RETAINING WALL 4i �- FOI:LOYYS BURIE{i EL :_., tE ? `'� :. `..` CURB L1 s . 7 �,, . IAAciIVG ( 3'1y �'-- _ S65"55 45 E ] .8O I IOL Y CROSS i . . . . 26 . lr '<, ry^, FOR BUILDING �, I 8. ., -r., AS .LOCATEf) BY w:, 13 A {i 04'55 h � 9.3q .• _ EL.EC; ASSt7C. { �.-.. L1I�rlEtvslONS5 f ' LA3 II ,.�� ` GAS � L1NE --�. 1. 4 A - R T I 2. EASEMENT AIA -r. L 8 558 O6 fl4 E 86. 2 C LC dW. EASEIEN ( T) .. r ANI?TIaS L1.6 PROP R -�, 4e - 4 . 1. i . h ,.. GARAGE F�ROPI RTY L19 N58 4S {34 W 81.57 CALC - . A5PNALT ,.. 8511 13849 I .. # ..': f, f3Rl ,� / _ LEASE , AkEL.. { ) LINE .� 1. VE/' f..€T BUILDiIc .� 1 . F ' #1. >� ;# LINES . .. !.: ;,: sta TRA �.. 1 t .�t1 , . K NG. N L2€} 522 4La C18 E b CALL 71? i ..- FclCifG .-, B�0 .. ,475 Sc 84 5,1332 ' TL E f i t7 PARKING PEDESTRIAN S`', . . .1. .r �: -- 4 P VE L21 . N78 51 "uv 1 9.32 GAC VAI A / A I _ L I SILL GE, SECOND FILING . .. . _ ASPHALT DRIVE .� �• :, EASEMENT ,� ?. .. � � -'.WALK Icz- � .. . . .. .. .. . .... - CONCRETE - 5.OQ 3 : 1 I - _ _... . 1.622 ACRES CALL -L BOOK 3 9, PG 888 : �' ,. I _ r 3 `. . r .. .., ,�. L7 ..�.: ----r--,-,--%*JL � ,� .� . ,�,- . . . � . I � � I . . , ­ . , . . I . . I I . r r I . r . . 7 .- � u. 1.623 A� 'AT 4. -. .. C�>rs L � n,... 1. 1. 1 -. -'I 0 , ? �� LIGE : - c ,. .�r _ k ' r r ,7 .99 �- r -...., ..a' . � � �. 'moi ^ :� a �. K I % !` .?'. OVERHANG s t ��io5l 2.3' .; .a��,VJ `'!d .y PARK NG 2' �=�� ! I �, - ° �?. > t C f '�a I I47 its ts9', c w 1` a.Z.t s,,. �(CAi C) 1. A7TE+iDAIr1T' �• f : (CII CRETI<. ' s 1 , „ o a ... _ ^~ -`� -. y `l s. - . , - " i' € , PARKING. . • { CONCRETE '� j 3 "' 743 w _ .-.-,_�..,,,. 1V . / CT , . \ \ASPHALT �,I .. .iTATI 3ISl ♦' / I, - I , ; 7., 7. ' t WALK t € ,3 h r �.2 �+ e ' 77 �- g 4i t _'^�-� 1.�. .. - -. �. € z _}- F3.2' a- a=�V�.3� l3f`-,� t. / `."'€ - - , r ;�.... i i' _ 44,5• :. f€..�,� ! € PATH j 1. E.. ..S. I . € PARKING ,a 0 't, 8�•$9' "' / �'") \ �` � 'Cft€ r j STRUCTURE S i h. i r L -43.37"C NCRE ^ °_ T C �s r � ,' r t i I �-. T 21.7© I �? SES Q 1 , ! 26.4' -� € � dUTL NE - „ • �!I0 ! '' 1 PC3RTE- , r � •) 0 I.- s ,. Y+iALLS a '' BLOCK } �, •3 f €�iI:ITYAsl $.- Irak f t' ; '{ BRG53 t2 24 E I TYPICAL) �o.a' i WALLS 4- .. _' T1 COCHERE I •t c.z'~ € . ti € . .� ._, `` 5.0' RLC..# 2088 . \ _• I I �._t (( .� _Q/jo "r I - h C LEN=43:36 _ , .. i rCv �O rF^4 5,0`� `I '/`t, " CONCRETE WALK f f , 10 a BUILDING 1 °y ",, : \ _ ASPHALT - I rt xt,a' r cAf ILII %4� J t . �. \ �. ' ,- PARKING ' � ,� \ . V' ~r . - .• - , I V- OUTLINE .. R �X I ¢ s.z' ' 18.4' BUILDING I -, I AIa PROAERTY - GC)NCRE-TE , VNB BUILDING 1C3` UTILETY 4)� ^`� r� LINE WALL n L 1 `I 0.5572 ACRES (CALC) BUILDING A. j V-- 1 EASEMENT teary :. �, �.°.�����, ASPHALT r� 9.s' 4' OVERHANGS I ' fIUTLIN£ ' e -. 0,5572 ACRES (PLAT} {PLAT} as > { � \ WA K �.. LOT:. O ___N ;� i1: L7 r �' I hj `.� -_ 1}.42 : ACRES (CALC} t' ' o �.s i .,` 1 C7 , - r ,`\ y/ , # - � GARAGE a "' ! , 24:2' I. jam = t �. r 13.4.41 °AC L . - \ IT. _ EXIT 5 44.9 r I <¢ . RE5 (PLAT) i ' 11 .1 _�,-PERMANENT �.�. ' _ C? (� _ ..__...__ ._ ,1.7. �: ;r --"' �� 7.a' i U C 1�` C';�, l \ _ �r `f 1.��J I E i i i 7• � v� i F C� B 11 EA IrMI SIT 4 '.. , ct� c £TE a --�:, = t 1 I �, �� {BOOK 348, PG e , S : ,� CURB .r 1` �' - VAIL: VILLAGE, SECOND FILING = .t 1 E , n '. 1. 2�. �' .:~-L-� _ { c�, ## SCORPIO i " `•. �t�� ,�� f` - , ��.€I -€ cv, < < s.o CQItiiDOIUIIIVIUIatIS +� ° . N k, �\ A P - - BRICK WAIL � 2.188 AeRES {CAI C) CONCRETE I If , . RTY . ' C � �. ' 1,,, �� t ; 4i' i 7 , • 2.188 ACRES (PLAT) WALK '' l: NE . . , 4 AMP I ' I ." s GRE5S & _ Il i , , ASEMENT L.3 <�si_ C i $ 47 PRC3PERTY j, t _ „ .- �•%, �. € - Y" LIN£ �.a I ` C9 � i-- i :ti.�.�,(r N! `., , �� r• �" _ i- i ; K to30'60' cy SET 3.0' WITNESS CORNS`'.". j , ^~�-..-• : • : ' V, �_ _ i _ �* $ 1, �,- '-l.; CO i € = a M 4.s• i 85, QQ ....-. ; �� *. \ BUILDING ! ; 4.RE AR & 1 1 2' jrf �• e� # f3 / q : 1 ` t ,, `` € ' OUTLINE ''� ALUMINUM CAP � LS 26598 Er " `\ � € } r* to .` .,_T NAIL & 3/4 N . I ,,. PI -SASE II``�- ' ,�, . CU '-;,C RQCti ALL ' ASF?HAL.T . i. F ,. ".. 1 I IRASS WASItER f �3:-• <1/>�. w DI VE f > s' a.Q . I Q FIRST AMEN.D.EQ CONDO I� INIUI��I AR OF J ; L, f ' L " • R " r `. I .. 1. (I SCALE: 9 =34 BUILD€ E I.., ""• LSA 28598 (TYPICAL) // TEMPORARY UTILITY 1 187 06 26 ;. ��., `'� ` � t -: % ; �, �' SKAAL . NUS APARTMENTS .. �-•- , R=54.00 ,, . BUILDING - - ;�-- - . - , � , , . , i -_,_ C ONSTRUCT1pN EASEME .1 , y�� f`� \ �: BUILDING -� r.�,, _ L1 fi3.28 �;'.`� - tiVERHANGS OVERT TANG""-�2.0' � i - / (BOOT( 347, PG 775} w LT �I ,, ' �.I \ r . aa:5• � . . .,., - � � `` .A Tr 805.13 a ,� J : .. i PAVER 8RG-N75'18'25"W '' '11 � '7 i ,- • m ' ` ~�" "--, -"' _ _ , .�``" •..� SET 4 RESAR & / 1 �_ . N . - . #-- �. - z.4 I I�_--_-T- 1 1/2' ALUMINUM.' CAP SET Al 3 4" WALK C. LEN 99,81 `` ` •\\ � 7s.,' � n ` . t I - --11 '.S# 26598 (TYYI"ICAL) BRASS WASHES r �. N,1: ' � N. ,, r< -- _"`� - --- ___ to �' s2.:i. zz.e' Q 52.s t UTILITY _---_ ► . ti EASEMENT _ - # . { ). `.�\ `tir`r yS �� zs\ ` CONCRETE S3.s' -" ., q 7' ° ASPHALT f}RIVE.. i _ _ I ��' {8221 P610) A I"iUS AI'ARTIyENTS LS 26.588 TYPICAL > _ - ?D.3' �' �' _ . \ ^� e4., �Y e ` �� WALL e}t € t - - - I . ��' �'>�. ' , `1 . �. rg (TYPICAL) N ` y I F - - . . t EAS CORNER `�/��•. � � .; � r ..I t � � 38.8' � N � a. € � � _ # SOUTHEAST RN£ �. '�'� `rl f' - -- T t '�1 s. 4 -s. € ' ECIC ' 3.s' _ F ~ - "' 1 SECTION 6, TSS. R8flN1, 6TH I P.M. Y ~BUILDING `-�i6 0' �. FQi1ND 3 1/4" ALL7Mhf CAF LS 24325 LaT 9IF`, .`"`�v�. y \ 2�s• `' 11 �`_CONCRETE WALK -s2 s` -„ -- _--�.t#�-9'w PAVER ,. �""'•*... OUTLINE .� f'`ti°A11411111� 1 {3€ a� ts.z WALK I . TEARS _ r2,"O fff ;,. f :. I VA XE d A EXALT _ __ 7 -` I © _ SET N LVE BOX q.8' L W S. f . - YDim/ 'ti. =�.E ,�� ���;,�! i� ,Af.���'I•y 4-1(). f+ �, .. IF -=1 l 11�$' ••$:9• - Vii' Q© 10,ao© 0 Q _ _`TY`,. fi.% f = _ I ILDINf7 r 9, > I Lac i € ~+J � of _�- BUILDING 1� �` ;ti a ,. WJ; . . SONE -VENEL R - C:QNORETE DRIVES '�' �,r : ` I OUTLINE THE ALTHORN "�. $a' `-� ` .-" `� y `.E .r . � S2 4 ,3 tiff 37 Icrl " WALE PROPERTY i € - - �, ' PARKING _ c?i/,f +,mac ACCESS - OUTLINE - f - '� �a `� f %','<' ;' � ` ' ''' Z i AR�25. - i o LINE - i _ _ J. - - I j: "'~ 1 EASEMENTKi I S - _ -t- - 1. '�"" `' t *'' `> . � , , `�? `;; -- iU. ,r,� _ CONCRETE *WALR*.-1 J (CIN RETE. 'F '%l; f (BB72:13424} I *- . CONCRETE ,-.. , { < , �.Yr. r � - _:,..._.-• i I 'BALLS , I . �� PAN -.� \ y. ? : ✓�� :/. < d �^ c; I i c ? r Y t- I s , �' . (HATCHED) I _" �-- ,r- . . m. --,: �,• , <�. .: : �%� ., <.�, ,:. W � I ! .. EDGE OF f �-- Li 3 54'3L1""`" �`- ,� < - �'* > r Y.�' Y`�Y % 4 ` r f f. �. ...'� -�. _ -�.. " C, a^r : , , >, ► /j l ASPHALT I # �- . 1 - I `� R =475.00 _ _ - - - - --- -. -.._. ., X . �N - 39 42"W , 3 f .. ' I -. 71 r f 1 . € 0 _`'`'- `s Q -... _ �1�1*75(.�30' _`_ `.� --- -� tib�� >. ; >r ©�0.84�>. S< , , ,�.� ��`,! - i I 0. . I . _'+r '� / - LOT V ."vim 1x.31 .r7� ....�. t ""^� �,.:� _.�! . -�. i-� Yom. r ,i -y?rG :),Rs.�'. '�/`�' " ,rT / � -,,,�. ,S .�[C ', .S.`t./. . -- _ '.+..._ _._� � . '. `� l I RC=N78 � 27 itl CONCRETE -� 1 } j } ✓'� Cf -. ' �"� 1-11 v <I. „„' _ -....i .� ��`� �_ __ ^�� o., CURB -~-- _ _x.a \-c� i� SET #4 REBAR do """' -.-.., ;�,.. L I . 1- *A% � / dF � �rlcs _ •-, --LEN 115.42 WEST MEAD 0 ►f - . -,- - . � -' ., ----- 1 1 Z ALUMINUM CAP .1 L ---. . � �•�� . ,s4S -_ .6.E --�,- ...�,,,. DRI . (5Q' RC VV �" Ls 2ssss (TYPICAL) ...,_, ,-, . i . . . �. . . � 1%. -I - / I . . "�`-••- •- - _ "' .,.- -�... -.. ,, ....w ,,.� A5P ALT . � . - . I I . . I . I . . . . I .� r . . ... .-� --- -- . � . '*'-- --I - - I , '' . .. . .MUNPR & � LOT 7 --- -- -- ..--. �. �.. . ALTS fA�S� ���D �i�TLE � JRV�� Iuvr �I ASE€c GALS , �. _ �---_ .._._. / '� LOT 6 _�,. �,... - ..�� -�-- - . - QTS . �, c . 1. 1% COT VAIL ..VILLAGE SECOND FILING r.� ..41199 -HIGHWAY-6 & 24, EAGLE--VAIL � ! �.� et- --- . P.c3._80x°1230 � .. .� 4 2062-�2-.�ALTA.dwg . - DATE:1/4/12 TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY COLORADO - ELwAIzs, CQ. $1632% .1. g7ci s4s-�.14vs �` . / # SRN: I�Y:1 RAS"; 11= _ g JO8 tc. 20fi2.2 =1 ... . It, - TS1 01 mCUP m Y Z A 'Ps c @. LEM_; KtH - T T T T_- T_ -Lt w w - w- w ra - TV --- TV - ty - N TY ---•- u rYH PROPERTY LINE L12 DETAIL AMBULANCE DISTRICT BUILDING SCALE: 1 "= 10" 57 7 Ii { BUILDING -OUTLINE LEASE PARCEL (B407,P475 & 8415,P32) LEASE PARCEL LINE TABLE L10 L11 17.8(1 BUILDING OVERHANG OVROOFRANG 10.80' ` L10 59,70' L13 L17 .4, 1", k N 5$5'55'05 E 59.70' L15 SO4'04'55"W t 21.58' L16 S85'55'05"E 17.50' LEASE PARCEL. (9407,P475 & B415.P32) @. LEM_; KtH - T T T T_- T_ -Lt w w - w- w ra - TV --- TV - ty - N TY ---•- u rYH PROPERTY LINE L12 DETAIL AMBULANCE DISTRICT BUILDING SCALE: 1 "= 10" 57 7 Ii { BUILDING -OUTLINE LEASE PARCEL (B407,P475 & 8415,P32) LEASE PARCEL LINE TABLE L10 N8555'05"W 17.8(1 L11 SO4'04'55"W 10.80' L`12 N85`55`05'V 59,70' L13 SO4'04'S5"r'i 41.68 L14 5$5'55'05 E 59.70' L15 SO4'04'55"W t 21.58' L16 S85'55'05"E 17.50' L17 N04`04'55"E F BUILDING OUTLINE k� . moi- 2 4'L I - ROOF t OVERHANG� - TRACT C lk 4\ tom -05'41'30" VAIL/LIONSHEA4 G_ S� SECOND FILING T=92.10' BRC=S62'36'22"E (Ci-- / Y F $82-31-58-E (PIAT) LOT 2, BLK 1 C L N =183.97' f SEWERAN aLE VAIL f LI©NSHEAD. SECOND FILING " G ✓ \ ry e Y 7 MEAS RIM ,.8155.5' MERE INVERT -81460 .'"-,- "' PI;RESTRtRN ik �4 ���• ,� ^tri w Y , u'iiUTY ERidENT a Eti5'ER "64AJHOi.£TM1 " 'N dN ew RfEAS Rluia.St.$` ��tift�k 07 ,.���^- �� 1.i£AS FF'1..&143.7 E 53�) �r�--� a r C 52) A\c - • - v Y �+w - Y Y ."' �a39*G%4EA5 $dm 42 wD.Tt£ S79-4 f9.06 - 8, {C-gCuGRTANOGYALL Jh u M STORM ldAf€Hfft x .< `"J.r t�.$ O r + .,�, �.�}¢ v Y Y $ 3MEAS RIM 4'l9 -rte Sa ° F ° �`� `�_ --- _ Gv v u f E�1002 n -. I, ,�i- - Yl -:. �..7`� r - Sr_EiD '24' ,_�0.a 1 x M p' triCC14D 716 , �7: ^.,- �.�= = � '"' --• rc- � �:��r�i'�..� �.,`"�"°E31�'a"- F : RETAINING WALL_.r Bd h -c Fit lii TRACT A ¢ / -. ~ �, �' _ fi NTY VAIL 0%ILLAGE �f,' s [jjj s -_� »7-s3y5 ss -Tf IF SECOND yILhG ? %3 c � H}L� YCOS5Y ; e ,Qj Off- c ELEC. AS OC_ r. Gy. �4 k ` E : 01+1. S£hEEIJT `CONCRETE tt ' WOOD , TIE . i tJCNr POLE, -RETAINING i5'At.l, 5T , t SPHALT e» .- •-- ... (iYP1CRL) AG R PARiCsAIG € _ £ _ c 3V ORRANG 57.T D EDGE ae I h ASPHALT 510RMR4ANHOT E r i% �'/ •`-� MEAS MEAS INV=84AB.t" £ MEAS INV -8146.0' 1i' h t :. AHALT i LEASE PARCEL. rW FSp2 ,NG w (8407,P475 & 8418,P32) ° J r BUILOIg Ci7TU NG T } LOT F� j O n: MAIL. VILLAGE, SECOND FILING � POSTS. a £ \�,_ - � / f r „� _ _` " `" ---^• +- _ F OVERHANG CONCR£TUI i.0 ; 9' ` �, i DRAIN WALK ,, y , .� 'Ta s `" ��115 :/ r� /� } C Q7' PARKING ! STE GUARD 3.2 PARKING POSTS `? ATTENDANT STATION OVERHANGS PHALT (i FLAGSTONE B� \ A �r / 54 t, !"TALK �159 l f 25.4' j f / � 1 A'` r OVIST CORP. - U11UTY EASEMENT Ob 0./ 1 - r PEC 0 200$06469 LIGHT POLE / � y (TYPICAL) �� i" 0. t I& BREI J NG Fr � r;n r , t 5� SAGE- OF 1 i OUTLINE ASPHALT i M fl.4. C2t.`r i 1 ` ASPHALT PARKING / CONCRETE PACS �� SEWER MANHOLE /4 . ' ° FLAGPL3LE !` MEAS RIM -8142.8' xr G.8 LICHT AOI£ MERG 1NV£FtT-9424.fi` \° 11 _\\ C 5 - (TYPICAL) / L✓) ROOF I u3 F. r t 1 { co WAtA E OVERHANG E 4 Fjt , PD�� .,PAN LOT 10 10' EMENY _ PAN MAIL VILLAGE, SECOND FILING EASEMENT � ag�42 �„� � � ASPHALT (PLAT) CONCRETE GE OFfi. _ CURB. i �! cF ASPHALT \ \'�\ (TYPICAL)- yea' co i�• X \ \.Y� _. � _ � 'tea j(� a` \ \ w� / / G„ `ti p i BU9lt#NG' ` OVERHANG `t BRICK WA-47 - 1 L Cv "` 1 - � ; z Lo TRACT l� I \ \ �. . 6 CONCRETE PADFA rya t 1lA4LfLI4NSHEAD v '�, - \ ccer� / 3 '= SECOND FILING u r,~`* PERMANENT UnLtrr \ a �I ` `� SAN / I Ir y _ EASEMENT (80OK 348 PG 05) \� „\ �E ` \�_.�✓. � co � r{7S� �\ � t j �'3 5 :! I ' A`CKrt WALL 5iiASPHALT A=18706 26 PA EDGT: OF R=50.4(r ASHALT . _ �'A L=163.28r 20' 40, 60' TEMPORARY UTILITY �BUILDING CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT T$05.13' OUTLINE Av (BOOK 347. PG 775 � f3RG=N?5"18'25"W ; 25n W CLEN=99.81' f- CONCI2J TE. PAN r, ,,* ` \ .� � ��.. It µBUiI.OtNG I 1 OVERHANG ' tt BUILDING Bliit.DiNG �/ / ` I y ,,\ \ t - •_� c OVERHANG OUTLINE LIGH \� r 6,'T 1 {TFPTCALI LEGEND J2.7' cr � ` '^� �� �• F p} �� �3 -��F CONCRETE WALL ` \f3Utlt?ING `-`----�� �-.-�,. 3 7` ,r a MUTY ENCLOSURE 1.- _ _aVEFHANG UTILITY POLE -- ____. ,, _ BURIED SAS LINE \ INLE's .� j UTILITY ��} r BUILD GUY WARE GAS METER t, FfLd8138.7' .� -�� -: 0 y # a 0 0�s�VAULTS u �3 .�f {I OVERHANG 93 GUY POLE � GAS LINE MARKER ` \N� � "' � .� �° e �'-€ cONCREIE , -.__ �_ � _ 4� t �-T6.3' \ r SEWER MANHOLE :33$0 ASPHREDGEOF �` r e PAD ,{y`dY,O�'��• s. tis ° _ 52:6' } a BURIED SANITARY SEWER LINE LOT 9 \ INVERT -8124.V UTILITY HANDHOLE \ BURIED ELECTRIC LINE . \ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MEAS-� ,� ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER � � ��: y ` r � _ SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT Fns ``- }� �- # sTOR�, �n� CO CRETE s \ INLET = i \ .G' 1.0 - '�., '�..,_, .ew` � *--,. PAN "-jC - � : e s� IVERSM=814{1.9' i i; �\; 's . 't.&' I � 789' _ --- ELECTRIC VAULT/MANHOLE �� STORM SEWER MANHOLE ��� �� w ` �''tAtC i _ �' 43 ✓ t t 1_ ELECTRIC METER STORM SEWER INLET / -.. r _ L -\ ` F `� - -� �.; 4�'S3° A#� .©6'37" �` € t ST = CULVERT l •e = E � 7 >1 -$25.7 T t\ d.s' ELECTRIC OUTLET i6 h r ELECTRIC HANDHOLE 'CON - - SIGN WALK BURIED TELEPHONE LINE -`��+� Y.� F� sTOr.W ALL LIGHT/LIGHT POLE rr� r �1-�r r3��y e :� BURIES} FIBER OPTIC LINE. �`` � fi '/` 00 r ��v�Y • Y' ,. SPRINKLER VALVE ''�. - x=\ _ y COMMUNICATIONS VAULT/MANHOLE `�° '--. ©halj� �` 1 = - ` �. ,, 1 `�- r�� `Kj . TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 5v `-•. 5 INLET v G'✓ " -._ _"Z �? ^ y „�r� 7 f LAGPOLE _� r •C 5ii7Rhi - y ' f' r F%L+�£S7401' �p}}•-+- 'TELEPHONE HANDHOLE s LARGE BOULDER 1 e- � r '`ow J R 1 # ©Q 0 £ ^ £ BURIED WATER LINE �. �. f = � � r L=115.30r -7.94'Y--_Y-.-y Y _„y V Y Y Y - FIRE HYDRANT f LOT 8 `"� = _ � ; _ , BRG N B'42'2'7"W - DENt3iE5 DECIDUOUS TREE w/ GLEN'=115.Q2 WATER VALVE c APPROX. TRUNK DIAMETER fi , $EWER MANHOLE 0340 WATER STANK PIPE MEAS itl>d x8141.4' ' WELL HEAD X MEAS INVERT -8127.7' BURIED CABLE TV LINE � , i= DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE W/ CABLE TV PEDESTAL -=r sr` ;1 APPROX, TRUNK DIAMETER ►"°i'r",F�, 1 '---- _-�= �T CABLE TV HANDHOLE X. X' g .•...a �.I% �, 2=7 .:- 41139 HIGHWAY 6 & 2�4, EAGLE -NAIL P.O. BOX pox 12301 �� LCAT 7 t { 2062--2ALTA dwg JOB SIL , 2062 E 70)949, CO. 81632 DRN, BY DJE DATE. 1/14/12. 1 '.GE: 2 OF 3 (s7y���s-� 4Q6 ���wea TS102.CUP os LOT 2, BLK 1 VAILAIONSHEAD. SECOND FILING 1 628 0.5• ma CONCRETE \ "" SEVER MANHOLE 0040 `v �v�JP� PEDESTRIAN 8 I t . 0 ]]�`,,tt \ �WWAAUUft I / y n MEAa RIM .6172.0 v aR UTILITY EASEMENT' ( 6' MEAS INWRT.81622 It - PARKING u A'�v v\ _ 1 STRUCTURE HOSPITAL .n b- ' \\ary �\ FDGE Of ')- -. PARKING _________- ASP ALT CEMENT 0'I\ yr1.0\b 47'42"E `Y.- - _ (BsoB.P3z@) \ O L I / a/ .,ter,, \„ / _ S `_ _ _ b 6 m a >941'13 E 59.8 8 (GLO) 6 12'36'52" 226 -.-- - �m _ .. \1 I �d'T"°' R=469,30' 31'48"E 100.34' M K a '- • \a " i IMF =103.32' '� I % R=469,30' " MEAS 4322')-Sfis2a'31•E 100.29 PLATt 's _ T=51.87' \ �" L=146.70' " ' _ S Z�^W \ \c T=73.95. �E" o_ BRG N54 0 ® T2 / E C LEN=103.1 OUNINE °NSC0. 4� 8R =N 6'43'58"W SO A. b3 '" E � "• G4i '�' ✓� (eELOWCRAOE) BIW/cpE§ox � C LEN=746:10 UTN os•;: -- ~� ss_ T - - - 1"" �. .f o I �.%�m. )v._..•- .�- i INiE'RSTA FROONTq - j 1 G� ROAD ; - Har cross NO- EEEC. ASSoe 7p III -.I q.oW. EASEMENT „� 'CON ETE °.. : V4 sz WCCO nE _�.<v.<Y✓._/,' ,. b STB' 'u....c/ 9` �.!\ CCqq .n, <PARNINO 0 - _ �E�NUINc wA11 sT _:� a :;'r • r�' +V 25F GON �Ti\v`:/. a�.R ` •1 r4.]• 18 MR l '�._ R `-sem o_ P- u_P l I HOLY GROSS 269.01' ) \` un MENiM roes uvEnNc' Y s] r o I R.ow EASEMENT nE (Calc 37591 i'""`. '�' .h �' "- '•-� 1'- STORM MANHOLE I kETA1NW3 WALL GINO TE PAD/ / \ v \ 1' •' < I r ME45 pNV.8148.8' E �'\ I r �BS1yBACK P649) IIECNANICAL 13E 288.13' (PU WENT I- r a3' 9S MFRS INV.8146.0' W ( + n 0 �. DR E�MWNG R`"'c./ �TO UPB m n D 8• ( n I I GUARDRAIL e e'-' y_ A.. 4 9 `9. \ A \ E_ (84078 5 845.P32). iD "WARD POSTS _sti�r _ b -.�,a •`� ^ ASP97T�ALTS' •�. J i�IY., E" B / ..(TYPICAL). .f '.. DWl %° 04• �v-"rT I ` < ! �'.v ASPHALT - �'R). R "_-ate ._ w_�" a.�. �" OF �. 1 I'.l' 'Y�v� >" "� ASPHALT - MEASRIMAN-11166.7 9D ` +�: Xd t E _ ORILE/PARk1NG J J r "� BUttOING I A n 'I CONCRETE0.5 +) ✓° E E4 OJTLINE I ISTORM .a-- b f� { \. STORM ISIWO MEAS INVERT.8159.@ ai., � 5 ``� `,_ _ ♦ Y 1, rT'�i�- L/I •� -` �R� oflax w/ GAE Box `�'_. ' N�)'3 � "'," / '•'Ea -E _ "'"�R„_ POSTS \ ABPHAIT �A( (. i I 4.O'DIA �b `_ EASEMEIT(PLA �`-!A�, z16q�Y'Y v'-• 'J�� - �\ C..� b`R o DRIVE ' VENT o.5' f � ` <,. 73 1: •�_. z. ';i`�'I ry • E -.E a b E� u.� �. -� ,fes 213.50.E `� `i ✓C.Y� � / Y''�'`%l ` �_ �� `' E�,E` 5.+..R•_"�. r W/PxKINC AGA�RAi:E ,._.� - I. < <\ ROOF -n �•rs CWGL d Y may\ .q (.•_'+a- 'eE �(,` <j��r?(r�'8.. C(CNIYPICAI)�~ 'e.."`' ` ]70 ,).6--.5.,.`..j,,,ti.1 �`C •� _ �`e�E. i TRENCH `',-QUK 1 X'b!',. ♦ �S• p _. ' C HEIEi;..DRAIN (�` �.. ` P --TER AVI �. v..r ,) < _ .corWCR rt`• L t - " 6--0517 '43^ -� it ' =_ ' OLS' L PARMNG STEEL' T,' / .' I I �\ 4.0 ENT Jo) I I ! �., 469.30' -'"c -a'.~, PLANTER ;�'-[: i#� .€ 0^/" .._.,�._ oei 4URtD .. r\ Ir3.r` ., nL-43.... N' 1`.,� n ?QSiS �OVERHDANGa 37' Bo1Lo1Nc 5 t•-' 4113{y 9.8 g T=21.70' # 1 8 w. \ 1 `•, / 1 s (6s y I BRG=S63'02' 4"E °vExnnrvc - ^ D J 9 _y EDGE OF ei ' • `/ BLOCK ALL ` PARKING/PEOESTRIAN 9), ASPHALT _b I `: C LEN=43.36 0 26.9 .yi' I EASEMCNT DfliVE/PARKING `�«r {TYPICAL) (BOOK 319, PG 808) CONC. WALK BUILDING UVER TANG w��BELOWWADE ):�' I WRINE m 0.3' i - G WuIUNE 21.3' I '• ° .I �i{t• t VNB BUILDING I m 9.a oop OUTLINE o ° BUILDING 9 A a 1 ro a 1 �N I / OUTLINE J'3 8 r ry i f V LI 1ql 0. CY �rv. I�-•� .'� RtNIDING 1'^%1 '1e TRASI O 11) TRENCH '4, q �N ° wo w ") DRAIN IlCONc WALL 2 ��`� ' <.�v�[ _ 1 ]' m ,", z e9.1' I /. sP rl f ENaosuRE SCORPIO CONDOMINIUMS HANG < is LD1 :I CONCRETE' (. (TYPICAL) .. -, Jam. 1o. a' O8, -G8 0" JI 7 "'' v VAIL VILLAGE SECOND FILING r c5wu f / � �� `/ ISLAND GO / b V .�T E .. �( fn CONCkE¢ If / .(n J INGRESS. EGRESS 9 0' 20" 40' 60' DRIYE DRAINAGEEASEMENT mL'I CONCH • CURD P 'F�, i. o fi T ,dry a> eif I f C m4WAV S, (2) •0.5' _ .. - ^ x 1 _.. g;a= (179 41 ^N m -^--' _--�_ _ 13 165.00 - EDGE ASPHALT I 1 ------------- 52 PHASE 11 FIRST AMENDED CONDOMINIUM M PA OF"- IE&METMIT (I8135 SKAAL HUS APARTMENTS ' (8211,PBI0) �° `� / ASPHALT f NG OuTLME La' I b BUILDING 1 '^ 23.8 51.3' BUILDING (- I OUTUNE sz.r �; Q �� WT19NEI_ i ? s ' I THE ALPHORN \BUILDING i-- 3) . a\ f OVERHANG 1 I " to J' l -' o A SKAAL HUS APARTMENTS T P BLIILOING �<,EL OVERHANG IS �. i Se.B r �� I us N ,)> n j o.s' r LEGEND L-�E / STAIRS %J 9' I L�.AND V6i T -L .'L63 43. t' rITV/ CATS Box 1 x 516 - , -'? �' .S' `_ ✓�T%t% \\ /��L'y^�'�' 1 CONIX98ff•' r /// / / / , � < � � UTILITY POLE - c - c - c - G - c - BURIED GAS LINE \ '%• m BGIIDING /` "9Sn �<-PLANER 'I /j / /// : \ .l. GUY WIRE .. GAS METER OERHANG I L r i A'J �. `.EM'�<. _ 1 ® GAS LINE MARKER 0 LL ❑ GJ i �. O GUY POLE +=6.E 7Ba'_-_- ,,(O ENi o s' r TIUTY HANDHOLE p• '• _^\\.- s3 �""`� "f o Q o 0 oaq 1 , , ' �',.(e@T2.Pa1a), ,. ® BURIED ELECTRIC - �`1O• d -3b6' 1 j -s°\•_ - - _ - G '"('. TT' wAu CONCREE '' . f /{HATaI�)� i° I _ u ARC 8g 71 37 y ST f �jf/// - - E -❑ E - e - B UNE O BURIED SANITARY SEWER LINE TYPICAL) I ;/ /� may" SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE •52' 4z r;e� ,� I d, ::..� '0.8 �� 4�D.J' I WALK '�,°--'� ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER � SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT ,[]P 'oa" oWGREE 1.° 1 _ __ ik+K - 1. •�. / STORM SEWER MANHOLE < I wAUc STONE Y}NFFR I'o e' 1 C(MCRiiE, '�<-- ' SRMAOE „ I} // i r/ 08' % t0' E ELECTRIC VAULT/MANHOLE WALL 1 -• _I E I ' 1, ii /i/i rte" STORM SEWER INLET .J\���`�F��� r \ ` - / �1s� WALK yI /` •1 I F ?• ENttosuRE ' /i / r / EM ELECTRIC METER CULVERT >' y n T < r r� . '��/ / i >.. I.d© ELECTRIC OUTLET T k.'.1•i .�.- a .'lam.__ !i /r] -HH ELECTRIC HANDHOLE c� SIGN �'�Y' /,r .',T .Y_'_ N85'39' ( s I. / ///%//<h X __ T - T - BURIED TELEPHONE LINE 42'W i // i UGHT IGHT POLE 300.84'. 7 ED J I e{ u - T- T /L ` X13$4' D" -n - " -~ 4 T ✓ ` i < / 7 fs. �R PM T/. - w - w - ro - w - w - BURIED FIBER OPTIC UNE E -e -'E-- 1 < V�R �' r v .-\ SPRINKLER VALVE R=475.65' _v'v-•� - � � "' - -� _ °-E-e_E- - FLAGPOLE e '. v ` Jv \ <'•\ ��: \ v �1 r� i<` / ® COMMUNICATIONS VAULT/MANHOLE L=115.30,-•-Y-r-Y-°-r - _ L'_ < / \: T=57.94 S -'-. -v v_ =v_v - t i 9. r .y I © TELEPHONE PEDESTAL BRG=N78'42'27"W 5E OMaVHaE o3w f ^ tiS ' - -\ y !« \ I \~ / iJJ ^ 4 y _ H LARGE BOULDER C LEN=115.02'.8141.4'_Y_ ` r r \ Y C ( -- L - TELEPHONE HANDHOLE WAS RIM . EDGE E"- E'•-E-�E �.�, r 7 `, / , r ./ra,54yA��� BURIED WATER UNE - MEAS WVERT.812].>' ASPHALT '- v -- . _ '�.xa.�,m_ _.,A > }/J s� � Y °i "l" 'n. MEADOW DRi- ""'�aX rte" RANT DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE w =�=d- WEST VE (50'v �E�� - _ _=_� h..�� WATERFIRE `N / _,�= _ ,OJ ,,ii ]] _ SEINER MANHOLE D,szo ROW V Y "°""""« APPROX. TRUNK DIAMETER -- MEAS RM.81941 EDGE v. er- a('•"Rv«, ✓I" MEAS INVERT.81241 - - _ XX ASPHALT I OD C WATER STAND PIPE =�=A. I ooh...... r� . �, KOBFe*•;'p(`�•° OO WELLHEAD Irily --- -'�-•= _ - -,{' JT= -. - E -E `E -E-A- _ SEWER UANHOI<.Oaoo v O -n -w -n -n -n- BURIED CABLE TV LINE ` ENO NIF / •� -- -r� _ _'fT 'S'=:S'=.f= = E E `-`- II Z 8 / DENOTES TRUNK TREE W E -E- MEAS -T.88.5 m CABLE N PEDESTAL APPROX. TRUNK DIAMETER ems, :. `_m1 MEAS MV IN(N).8133.4=-'E-E._e� �.n �Z iP EMEAS INVCRT.8131.3 E'er R �1t1'�. °� �,� fes- � �J.t CABLE N HANDHOLE A. RO9 HIGHWAY 6 & 24, EAGLE-VAIL Ov�(` EY 2062-2A17A.dwg J08 NO. 2082 EDWARDS, CO. 81632 (970)949-1406 DRN. BY DJE OATE:1/ 4/12 PAGE: 3 OF 3 TS103.CUP 10 04 N d' cfl IO Irl - CD N N co LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 0. 0� 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0 .�\ 0. I, 2 0 .2 0. ti Apparent Ballast I 1 .2 '0 .1 T3 . T3.8 0 (� E 1 W5 D1 D1 6 1.5 4. Type Description EXTERIOR POLE MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, Lamp Load Voltage 277 V Manufacturer ARCHITECTURAL Catalog Series UCL SERIES Finish MATTE Mounting 20' MAX Depth Note E1 LED 84 VA T1.8 450mA DRIVER, TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION, ANGLED 4200K 2. 2.1 Tl 2.9 AREA LIGHTING .7 BLACK \ HOOD, SOLID RINGS, SLA17 MOUNTING 4090 LUMENS 84 VA 277 V ARCHITECTURAL % We 1 1.8 2.2 2.3 E2 EXTERIOR POLE MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, LED UCL SERIES MATTE 20' MAX . 1 3 450mA DRIVER, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, ANGLED 4200K AREA LIGHTING BLACK HOOD, SOLID RINGS, SLA17 MOUNTING 4090 LUMENS E4 E3 EXTERIOR POLE MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, LED 84 VA 277 V ARCHITECTURAL UCL SERIES MATTE 20' MAX O 9 .9 450mA DRIVER, TYPE 5 DISTRIBUTION, ANGLED 4200K 2.4 1.9 AREA LIGHTING BLACK .1 HOOD, SOLID RINGS, SLA17 MOUNTING 4090 LUMENS E4 EXTERIOR POLE MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, LED 168 VA 277 V ARCHITECTURAL UCL SERIES MATTE 20' MAX W5 2. 450mA DRIVER, TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION, ANGLED 4200K 2.8 2.2 AREA LIGHTING + .6 BLACK + 2.9 HOOD, SOLID RINGS, SLA17-2 MOUNTING, TWIN 4090 LUMENS \• ARMS PKWB SERIES COPPER SURFACE E5 EXTERIOR LED BOLLARD, T3 DISTRIBUTION, 6 LED 8 VA 277 V ARCHITECTURAL 2 .3 LEDs, DSOF DECORATIVE SCREEN 4000K 1.8 4 AREA LIGHTING 1.4 + l 2 1.3 .5 /1.7 1. 1.9 EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, 36 324 LUMENS ARCHITECTURAL PKWS SERIES COPPER / W4 LED 39 VA 277 V WALL ;; 0 2 0. 5 LEDs, DOUBLE HOOD, DSOP DECORATIVE 4000K 1.0 1.3 1. 1.5 AREA LIGHTING .1 .7 SCREEN, MOUNTED FIXTURE ABOVE WITH ARM 1812 LUMENS MOUNTED DOWN W5 EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LED LUMINAIRE, 24 LED 28 VA 277 V ARCHITECTURAL PKSA USDS SERIES COPPER WALL LEDs, UP/DOWN SPREAD, DSOF DECORATIVE 5100K AREA LIGHTING SCREEN 1125 LUMENS 0. 0/'0. 1 0. 1 0 .2 0. 3 0. 6 T(S . 9 1. 3 1. 6 1. 7 Tl '0 .8 0. 6 - 5 0. 4 �0 .4 '0 .3 0. 3 0. 3 TO .2 '0 .2 0 .2 0. 2 0. 2 '0 .2 0.2 0. 1--n1 n r 0. 0 T2 0 TO .0 0. 0 TO .0 0. r' �1 oM T SO* \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I 0. 1 0. 1 0 .2 0. 4 0. 8\ l .. 7 2. 2. 3 3 1. 9 1 . 7 0. 6 0. j 0. 5 0. 5 0 5� 0. 4 0. 4 0. 3 0. 3 0. 3 0. 2 0 .2 0 .2 0. 1 _ + u 0. 0II' 0-� �� 0 E1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 X1.9 +.0 2.1 +2.0 +.3 .5 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.0 1. 1 1.4 .8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 X0.1 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 ?� + + + + + / + + + + - + - + E1 + + +0 + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 �6\ 1 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.8 1. 2. 2 6 .1 .6 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2. 8 1.7 0.� 0.6 0.4 i 0.2� .2--n ? 0.1 0. 0. E1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 +1 2.8 1.9 1.4 1 3 �l.4 �1.6 1.8 �l.8 �l.8 �1.8 2.0 2.4 2.4 .0 9 2.9 2.4 2.3 2.6 + 3. �2.7 2 �,--2.1 + + -2 1 '1 . 5 2. 0 �0 . 8 0. 7 0. 7 OSI - 3 ��0.1 0. 1 �0.0 / E 1 �, _ ° b 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6/ + 2.5 1.3 1. .1 2.9 2.7 2.2 1.9 1:8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1. 2.0 2.4 2.3 2.6, +.7 3.4, 2:0 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 + + E1 d C 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 ! 2.,, 1.6 1.0 1 # 4 7 .5 -2.6 1.9 1. 1.9 2.0 2.0 1:7� +1_7 2.0 2.1 2.1 '1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.1 .4 a.2 1.8 1.9 1.R 1.6 1. d + + + /+ + - - + + + + + + + + + �i 0.2 0.4 0.8 .6 2.4 1.6 1.1 1. 2.3 3.7 3.1 2. 6 1.9 2.6 2. \,'1 6 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.6 1. .8 T1.0 0. 0. O 0 .2 0. 5 0. 9 1. 6 2. 1 2. 0 1.6 1.2 1. 1 1.5 2.1 2. -1 . 7 .5 1. 4 1.8 2. +. 3 +1 51 2. 4 8 2. 4 2. F +2 . 5 1. 8 +1 . 7 Tl . 7 2. 3 T3.1 +3 . 5 +2 .5 T1.0 +0 .5 +0 . 6 0. 6 +0 0 E3 o 0.2 0.4 9 1.8 2.4 -2.1 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 +1.3 1.3 1.4 1 9 .2 2.4 4 1. 1 5 1.7 +2.3 3.2 1.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0:1' 7E1 2 1, __5 E4 I 0.2 + 0. 3 2.6 2.2 1. 1.2 4 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.4 d 5 1 3 9 1.9 1.5 2.1 3.0 1.4 1.8 .7 3.4 2.5 1.1 , 0.4 0.3 0.3 + .2 a 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.1 2.9 3.1 1.6 1. 1.6 + .4 3.0 3:5 2. 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 .9 2.4 2.9 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.6 / 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.2 + 0.9 0.5\ 5 0.4 E1 GENERATOR + \/+ + \ +-3.1+ + + �i + + + + + 0.1 '0 .300 2 3.4 Tl . 9 6 1.7 '1 . 3.6 3.3 '3 . 3. 6 2 .7 '2.4 1.6 1.2 '1 . 2 +1 . +0 . 9 T1.0 TO . 9 TO . 9 1.4 1.8 T1.1 '2 . Tl . 9 0.8 Tl . 6 1.1 . 3 \ / E4 � o W4 � o ,� W4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +_ + + + + + + + + + o 0.1 \� .3 .6 1.3 2.7 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.8 3. 3 1 .8 .5 .0 1.7 1.3! 1.1 7__0.6 0.6 4. W4 8. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W5 W5 �ill'U D1 D1 0.1 0. 0 0.4 1.0 2.1 2.0 4 .9 3.6 4.4 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.2 2. +2.2 1.8 +1 4 / .1 1.0 5.y 0.5 0.3 1 0. 0. 3 0. 8 +. 4 1. 0.]0. -Ilk 0 1 ,. +0 �. / 1. 0.0 0. \;0.1 0.2 0.4 1. 0.0 0.1 0.1 �.2 0 "_s .0� 0.0 0.1 0.1 .2 0.3 0. . 0 0. 0 . 1 �0 .1 0 .2:;3 0.0 0.1 0. 0. 0,\ 0 0 +, �\ \` EHH \ / W5 D1 D1 + + + + + + + + + + + 7 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.4 .7 2.0 1. 1. 0.9 0.9 1. 2.4 0.3 0.2 0. 0 0. 0 + 0 1 0. 1 �0 v2 EH + V A\� + .0 0.0 0.0' + .0 0 0.1 0.1 0.11 + + ` ,0.0 0.0 0 Q' 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 \ I 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.4 y 0. 3 + '1 1. 1. 5 0 1 xV .2 0.�3 1.� 2. 1.8 0. 0 0. 0 + �0.0 0. 0� 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0 .�\ 0. I, 2 0 .2 0. ti +.-_ ., 7 1. 6 1 + .1 .0 I 1 .2 '0 .1 T3 . T3.8 0 (� E 1 W5 D1 D1 6 1.5 4. 4.6 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 W5 W5 + *0 + O I+ 8 0.9 0.9 .1 i 3 1.7 2.0 2.0 T1.8 T1.8 2.5 1 2. 2.1 Tl 2.9 Tl .7 \ % We 1 1.8 2.2 2.3 1.9 .9 1-7- \2 3. 9 2 3.1 3 0 +11-,8 . 1 3 E4 _ / O 9 .9 3 1 3.2 2.4 1.9 2.4 3.5 .1 % W5 2. 4.5 3.9 2.8 2.2 2 6 2.8 2.0 + .6 2.6 + 2.9 E2 \• 2 3.9 .2 Tl 9 / + j1 . 6 2 .3 2 .4 1 7 1.8 4 .Q.B' 1.4 + l 2 1.3 .5 /1.7 1. 1.9 1.7 + 0 / 4 ;; 0 2 0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 1.0 1.3 1. 1.5 1.5 .1 .7 0. 0 0. 0 + 0 1 0. 1 �0 v2 EH + V A\� + .0 0.0 0.0' + .0 0 0.1 0.1 0.11 + + ` ,0.0 0.0 0 Q' 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 \ I 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.4 y 0. 3 + '1 1. 1. 5 0 1 xV .2 0.�3 1.� 2. 1.8 0. 0 0. 0 + �0.0 0. 0� 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0 .�\ 0. I, 2 0 .2 0. ti +.-_ ., 7 1. 6 1 + .1 .0 I 1 .2 '0 .1 T3 . T3.8 0 (� E 1 W5 D1 D1 6 1.5 4. 4.6 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 W5 W5 + *0 + O I+ I° El I 7 2.2 W5 D1 D1 6 1 + .1 .0 I 1 .2 '0 .1 T3 . T3.8 0 O W5 D1 D1 6 1.5 4. 4.6 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 W5 W5 + *0 + O I+ 8 0.9 0.9 .1 V . V ° E5 L' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.7 3 3 1. 0.8 .0 0.0 0.1 �\ X/ \� V \\ ' + + v + + +, + + + E5 + + 0 . 0 0 . 0 TO . 0 TO . 0 . 0 TO . 0 TO . 0 0 . 0� : 0 . 0 TO . 1 0 0 ., . 5 T . 4 2 . 1 .2 0 . 3. 1 '0 . 3 0 .2 0 . 6 W 0 . 9 TO . 5 +0 . �N5 TO . 8 TO . 3 0 0 .0 ++ + + \ + + + + + + + + + E5 + + + + + + + 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 `: 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1\ 5 . 3 11 i. 0. 7 6 ® 0. 4 1 .°4 0.5 -_ -fl -? 0. 8 0. V ° E5 1 E E5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.1 + 0. \.5 0.3 0.5 0 1.4 ° 1.4 0. 0.0 �� 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0 0`0 -_�0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 0 2� 0.2\'•, 0.3 \ 8 3.7 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TRANSFORMER 1500KVA` 0. 0 0. TO . 0 TO . 0 0. 0 TO . 0 �-- TO . 1 0 .2 \0 . 3 TO . 4 0. 4 0. 4 0. 3 TO . 2 0 .2 0. 1 E 1 0 2 0? 3" HCl;. _ 0� 0. 0 0. 0 0 TO . 0. 0 Q. 0 0 0 0: 0. 0 �r 0. 0 \\ 1 o ++- �, +> + 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0.1 0. 1 2 +0 .2 0 0 .2 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0 .1 0.1 0.1 0. 0 = 0��,. Q 0 Q Q� 0 t0 ., ,, 0. 0 C. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 c V ✓ __ TXX +0 1 0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.l l o.i 1 o.l 0.1 0.0 0.0 +o.o o.o +o.o o.o o.o o. 0 o a, p.0" 0 Q:� �,0, o�a o o>� •Q ot �- `� 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 0 �0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 TO . 0 0. 0 . 0 0 .n' -_0J000� \0 0. 0 0. 0 f0 . 0 TO . 0 TO . 0 0. 0 TO . 0 TO .0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 TO .0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 TO .0 t + + 0.0 0.0 0.n O.n 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0- -0-: 0.. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - CUP SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS DISTRIBUTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF OWNER, DESIGN TEAM AND CONTRACTOR REVIEW THEY AREA WORK IN PROGRESS AND ARE NOT FINAL. THEY ARE BY THEIR NATURE INCOMPLETE THESE DRAWINGS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION, ANY ATTEMPTTO ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION COSTS FPOMTHESE DOCUMENTS MUST BE DONE WITH EXTREME CAUTION. COST ALLOWANCES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR BOTH DESIGN ELEMENTS AND MATERIALS WHICH ARE NOT YET INDICATED ON THESE DOCUMENTS. BOTH THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY EVALUATE THE CONTINGENCIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FACET OFTHE WORK, AND CARRY THE APPROPRIATE VALUE. CATOR, PUMA & ASSOCIATES HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH DESIGN ELEMENTS AND MATERIALS NOT YET SHOWN ON THESE DOCUMENTS OR FOB ONGOING CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGSV+ICH MUST OCCUR AS THE DESIGN AND DRAWINGS ARE COMPLETED, HEERY s • � Heery International 555 17th Street, Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 720.946.0276 project number 13026.01 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER Phase 1 West Wing 181 WEST MEADOW DRIVE VAIL, CO owner's project number consultants/construction managers STRUCTURAL: Structural Consultants Inc. 3400 East Bayaud Avenue, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80209 303.399.5154 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, LOW VOLTAGE: Cator Ruma & Associates, Co. 896 Tabor Street, Lakewood, CO 80401-4700 303.232.6200 CIVIL: Martin/Martin 225 Main Street, Unit C101, Edwards, CO 81632 LANDSCAPE: Lime Green Design, Inc. 900 East Louisiana Avenue, Suite 209, Denver, CO 80210 303.733.7558 seal/signature issued for date PROGRESS FEB. 6, 2015 item date CUP RESUBMITTAL 03.12.2015 sheet title ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN sheet number .E100CUP ■ This document is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all drawn by Author checked by Checker rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright © 2013 by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 30"x42" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. Existing Lanscape Coverage I IN,% n .1 P% r 1-1 n Ani X `C TX 7A 4f'-' Vail, Colorado January, 20 CRAPHICKALF V NOMH IN F;tE-r [Hely}A Existing Site Coverage and setbacks - -�_ 'v Site Coverage = 78,539 sf (47.2%) + • •_ �� 0 Vail, Colorado January, 20 GRAPHICSCALL (INFED NORM I I -h - V It EVERGREEN LODGE WESTVANG AREA OF WORK wY fflF 00DOM Total Site Area= 166,269-4 - - - - Site Coverage= 85,000 sf (51.1%) Landscape Area= 23,981 sf (14.4%) &ITE PLAN WEST MEADOW DRIVE Site Coverage and Landscape Calculations '7' 1?040 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - AREA OF CONSTRUCTION 1 EXISTING - NO WORK IN THIS AREA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION design I ,H, -tll ;,-, ;, VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1@1 WE57 MEADOW ERNE VAJL. CO .— GWN_cR5PRU-ECTN,.MHA -., „W= ­ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ARCH ITECTURAC""' SITr. Setbacks VITE TkE XE MTEAv CJ TNUE510 sWaY THE Ff1LO W r �NRNNG LAY T TO AWHMOE HUMER OF SPACES F9 MYS TO TERMNI,TE THE EDGE OF PANNI M THE YESIFW! MOST PROPERTY ME FOR BETTER STREAM PROTECTION o CREARNO A SEPARATE EN1WwCE TOLOT M TO INf`fEFSE PAR GEFHMCY •4`IA r 11 I EVERGREEN LODGE - - -- r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t I` t T7 r I � i r rr `TEMPORMiY (E) AMBULANCE Ir GARAGE 105, t 121 (E) PARKING rs ®� ; -1 19GARAGE f � t SO WAM ft fit I 23Lt fi VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (E) VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING NO WORK 6N THIS AREA AREA OF WORK 45 RSLCCAT€o \ Ptwr —————--—— % lei 1A 1-7ErgcwrFo �t 11 - - T, L 1 I 1 y 33.E a 33' 35.5' or 35.5' � �Fosa,�+omNE i 1 r r - 3.5'—/l.4' WEST MEADOW DRIVE ' — 6 0' '—,.—— r r r t i t i AREA OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING - NO WORK IN THIS AREA ' r � t r � t -Z HEERY HGP -1302604 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT +31 WEST MEAIXJYV DRNE VAR. m GWNER PRRIECT NUMBER uraVRMR:OegrYen7n nvne99�i �Rro WOICAL .CFESSIp1M NOR ShHCWH ,idler dela CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JAftlUR� aPTESd�rru FES9�i5 SITE PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION anew mw ARCHITECTURAL SITE Snow Storage (typ.) Snow Storage Summary Paved Area = 46,841 sf Snow storage shown = 8,525 sf (18%) arran aac;apu[Ioc;. V V M C west Wing UP""" Parking Lot Zoning Analysis Snow Storage rr J 04, ---------------- ff 18 Spaces • _ f C Spaces / o I O � r� I 6 'Spaces 1 11 - r1 � r r r f r J• I I West Parking Lot - Parking Spaces i if if i 16 TOV •�' / ,' --- - � - aces Sp 1 t 40� � fI 84 VVMC Parking Spaces Oxygen Farm. r Total Parking area = 42,506 sf Total Landscape = 4,665 sf (10.9%) aq'gM000C70 —� �,y fit: •- ^• VVMC Nest Wing CUP--_-�--- --y- Parking Lot Zoning Analysis Landscape Area Vail SITE SPECIFIC REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AN ELEMENT OF THE VAIL LAND USE ADOPTED ON MARCH 1%, 2015 BY RESOLUTION 3, SERIES OF 2015 2015 Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan Prepared for: The Town of Vail Prepared by: Vail Valley Medical Center ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Vail Town Council Andy Daly, Mayor Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Pro -tem Jenn Bruno Dave Bugby Dave Chapin Greg Moffet Margaret Rogers Town of Vail Department of Community Development Town of Vail Department of Public Works Vail Planning and Environmental Commission Henry Pratt, Chair Webb Martin Dick Cleveland Luke Cartin Pam Hopkins Michael Kurz John Rediker January 2015 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 APPENDIX: 2Background on VVMC 3 • Traffic Impact Study, TurnKey Consulting LLC, Sep- tember 30, 2014 3Master Planning Process and Master Plan Goals 7 • Delivery/Service Vehicles on Meadow Drive, TurnKey Consulting LLC, October 10, 20144 Overview of Expansion Plans and Design Considerations 11 • Preliminary Heliport Feasibility & Design Study Re- port, HeliExperts International LLC, October 21, 2014 5 VVMC's New "Front Door" Meadow Drive, Loading/Service 19 (amended January 15, 2015) • VVMC Frontage Road Access Analysis of interim 6Traffic/South Frontage Road 22 Frontage Road conditions, TurnKey Consulting LLC, January 12, 2015 7 Parking 26 8 Emergency Helipad 29 9 Other Considerations 32 10 Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge 36 TEAM: N FurnKL Owners: Vail Valley Medical Center ':L cwawrrRa, ucArchitect: Heery International Vail Valley Medical Center Planning Consultants: Braun Associates, Inc. ttXPERTs INTERNAT40HAL u.c. , Traffic: Turnkey Consulting, LLC Helipad: Heli Experts International, LLC January 2015 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 1. INTRODUCTION Since its establishment in 1965, Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) has grown into one of the world's most advanced mountain hospitals, providing Olympic -quality sports medicine, leading evidence -based research, modern cancer care and extensive cardiology capabilities. While the medical care and services provided by VVMC are outstanding, the hospital's infrastructure is due for modernization. VVMC is at an age and condition where it must be modernized to meet the challenges of modern medicine and to ensure the facility provides medical staff with the resources necessary to offer the utmost in quality health care. The Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan (the Master Plan or the Plan) establishes a vision for how VVMC will respond to these challenges and in doing so addresses a multitude of operational, clinical, and technical requirements that are not being met by the existing facility. In addition, an equally important element of the Master Plan is how it addresses important neighborhood and community goals. The Master Plan provides a general direction and framework for how VVMC will redevelop in the future. It has been prepared with extensive input from physicians and staff, neighbors, the community at large, review boards and Town of Vail staff. Information provided herein is intended to demonstrate how future expansions will integrate with existing VVMC functions and the surrounding neighborhood and how, at a general level expansion plans will conform to applicable Town development standards. Bordered on the west by the Lionshead Master Redevelopment Plan and on the east by the Vail Village Master Plan, the VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan will provide direction for a key community -oriented property located mid -way between Vail's two villages. The Master Plan has been prepared with a focus on addressing both internal and external goals or "drivers". Internal goals generally address the viability and sustainability of the campus, VVMC's goal of providing quality health care to the community VVMC Master Plan Study Area VaiI Streetscape Master Plan Study Area Lionshead Master Plan E i �` =t Study Area Fig.1 - The VVMC Master Plan area is strategically located between the Lionshead and Vail Village Master Plan areas. :�fi6 Village Master PIan Study Area January 2015 111VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 1. INTRODUCTION and the specific operational and clinical requirements of the campus. External goals generally address how VVMC responds to broader neighborhood and community considerations. It is often the case that internal and external goals overlap. Internal and external goals are discussed in greater detail in Chapter 3 of this plan. The underlying role of this Master Plan is to establish expectations for the planned redevelopment of VVMC and in doing so provide a basis for the Town's review of future development proposals. While information provided in this Master Plan is fairly general in nature, the Master Plan does establish many specific parameters for the future expansion of VVMC. Far more detailed information on the design, operation and management of future hospital development will be provided during subsequent steps in the Town's development review process. Detailed design and operational plans for hospital expansions that are deemed to conform to applicable elements of this Master Plan will have a greater expectation of project approvals than those that do not. The Master Plan will be used by the Town's Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), the Design Review Board and the Town Council when reviewing future VVMC expansion plans. A pivotal step in the Town's review process will be the PEC review of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applications. This Master Plan establishes parameters on a variety of development related considerations. Foremost among them are project design, parking, delivery and service, traffic, and the emergency helipad. As such, this Master Plan is the primary tool to be used by the Town in evaluating the merits of future expansion plans. In addition to this Master Plan, the Town's development standards, zoning considerations and CUP review criteria will also be considered in the review of expansion plans. January 2015 The Vail Valley Medical Center Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan has been adopted as an element of the Vail Land Use Plan by Resolution No. 3, Series of 2015, following a recommendation from the PEC. The Plan has been prepared to provide guidance specific to the planned expansion of the campus. As such the effective life of this Master Plan is five to seven years. It is likely that after completion of this expansion that medical technologies or practices will evolve, the need for new facilities will be identified or new ideas not addressed by this Plan will arise. Amendments shall be considered in accordance with the Amendment Process as outlined in the Vail Land Use Plan. Factors to consider in any amendment proposal include: 1. How conditions have changed since the Plan was adopted, 2. How the Plan is in error, or 3. How the addition, deletion or change to the Plan is in concert with the Plan in general The area governed by this Master Plan is depicted on Figure 2 below. JLL-14 1� E. `I Ll__ VVMC �1 2 - VVMC Site Master Plan Study Area. VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 2. BACKGROUND ON VVMC EVOLUTION OF VVMC VVMC began as a clinic in 1965 to support a then fledgling ski resort and since that time has grown at a level commensurate with Vail and surrounding communities. Today, VVMC is comprised of several healthcare campuses located throughout Eagle County and provides healthcare services to both residents and visitors of the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado. VVMC's main hospital campus, located in the Town of Vail, provides an essential service to the Vail community and the surrounding region. VVMC has grown into a major economic driver in Vail and Eagle County, helping to diversify and balance an otherwise highly seasonal economy. With more than 850 employees, VVMC is the second largest employer in Eagle County. This consideration alone has a very significant economic impact throughout the community. As documented by two studies, VVMC and its partners who practice at the Vail Campus have a direct economic impact to Vail. A Vail Valley Medical Center Economic Impact Analysis was completed by BBC Research and Consulting in 2009. The direct annual economic impact of VVMC-related spending in Vail was over $5 million, which included retail and restaurant spending by of the Clinic and Institute generate over $25 million annually to Town of Vail businesses. VVMC, the Steadman Clinic and Institute have a direct economic impact of more than $30 million annually. This is in addition to the annual on-site economic activity at VVMC. The majority of this economic activity throughout Vail is from the large number of "destination patients" drawn to Vail by the Steadman Clinic. In 2009 the Clinic served 10,500 patients. 4,600 of these patients involved surgeries, of which nearly 3,000 were destination patients. On average these patients made three trips to Vail, brought 2.25 people and stayed 4 days, equating to over 80,000 visitor nights in lodging properties. Spending on lodging, meals and retail from these visitors represent a significant portion of the Town of Vail economic activity generated by The Steadman Clinic and Institute. The building that housed the original Vail Clinic still exists at the southeast corner of the campus and is one of the various wings of the hospital that no longer meet contemporary healthcare requirements. Since the original clinic was constructed the following expansions have occurred: employees, employee -residents, patients and their families. This A 1971 addition to house support services report identified other notable benefits of VVMC beyond direct A 1978 addition that houses the current Emergency and economic stimulation. Foremost among these is the high-quality Imaging Departments healthcare being provided in a rural, resort area, giving Vail and The 1987 West Wing, which was subsequently expanded Eagle County a competitive marketing advantage over other in 1990, and accommodates the Patient Care Unit, mountain communities, including real estate sales implications. Intensive Care Unit, and the main VVMC Surgery Department In April of 2010, BBC Research and Consulting completed an A 2001 two-story addition to the central wing of the Economic Impact of The Steadman Clinic and the Steadman hospital, which included a replacement of the Women & Philippon Research Institute on the Town of Vail. Operations Children's Center, and construction of Vail Valley Surgery January 2015 131 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 2. BACKGROUND ON THE VVMC Center (VVSC), and The Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) In 2005, VVMC acquired the US Bank Building and since that time has been converting it to a medical office and administrative support facility for VVMC EXISTING BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES VVMC is an aging facility. Other than the Women & Children's Center and Vail Valley Surgery Center (13 years old), all other buildings within the campus are at least 24 years old, with some areas nearly 45 years old. There are many implications from the condition of these older buildings: The buildings' basic mechanical and electrical systems are nearing the end of their useful life, requiring higher levels of maintenance and uncertainty in service. In many areas of the hospital existing spaces no longer support the most efficient and appropriate setting for patient care. This is largely a result of the evolution in healthcare from a traditional inpatient type of delivery, to more outpatient procedures. This evolution has created the need for different types of medical facilities that are difficult to achieve in older buildings. Over time, new services and facilities have been added wherever the hospital can find space, sometimes causing disjointed functional relationships between types of services and patient's access to them. Higher levels of care require additional staff, medical equipment, and supplies. All of these factors have created extremely cramped conditions throughout the hospital. Over the past ten years VVMC has undergone a series of studies to determine the best long-term use and configuration of its Vail campus. Although one of the earlier studies had suggested that VVMC consider relocating most of its acute care functions to a new site in Eagle County, the VVMC Board of Directors has concluded that the main hospital must remain in Vail. The Vail Town Council has also strongly stated their support for VVMC to remain in Vail. This Master Plan was, in part, initiated to address sweeping changes in the healthcare industry, but also to ensure that VVMC remain in Vail, with a sustainable strategy to meet the long-term needs of the community. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING USES VVMC is located on three parcels of land that total 4.57 acres. The site is bordered on the north by South Frontage Road and on the south by West Meadow Drive. VVMC is located in the center of a transitional area between Vail Village and Lionshead. Existing land uses surrounding VVMC are depicted on Figure 3 found on the following page. Vehicular access to VVMC is provided by South Frontage Road and West Meadow Drive. South Frontage Road provides access to an employee parking structure located at the northeast corner of the campus and to the US Bank building. West Meadow Drive provides access to patient and guest parking at the west end of the campus and to loading/service facilities located at the southeast corner of the campus. Regional bus service is provided along South Frontage Road and Town of Vail bus service is provided along West Meadow Drive. West Meadow Drive also provides an important pedestrian connection between Vail Village and Lionshead. January 2015 141 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 2. BACKGROUND ON THE VVMC — EXISTING LAND USES Low Density Residential �Ni o t Acc ty Rctsodaidenteal I Resort Aeec�mnda tiaras MCommercial MPubhcOpen Space I'u61ie J=Ef}pen SpacePark VVMC Master PlanI -. XA Foisting U-4 Use ViiL [alonda. Fig. 3 - Existing land uses surrounding VVMC. A portion of VVMC's surface parking lot at the southwest corner of the campus is actually located on Lot 10, an adjoining lot which is owned by the Town of Vail. Via separate agreement, the Town utilizes parking spaces on Lot 10 (for use by the Vail Library), which are accessed via the VVMC entry drive. The property's zoning and covenant restrictions are discussed in Chapter 9 of the Master Plan. Existing site conditions are depicted on Figure 4 found on the following page. January 2015 151 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan a 8USIVEHI+CLLO, TRAFFIC *� � PIATIENI ALCII: AMBULANCE ACCESS Fig. 4 - Existing Site Conditions. Z. BACKGROUND ON THE VVMC - EXISTING CONDITIONS 4. . H� -, 4 so} o-- 40 41 so OF Jff M=p { STAFF r P PARKING — IJSB —LOADIMG}SERV'ICE ACCESS January 2015 161 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 3. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS AND MASTER PLAN GOALS THE MASTER PLAN PROCESS VVMC has spent nearly two years developing a master plan for the Vail campus. This process involved extensive collaboration with their consulting team, staff, the VVMC Advisory Commit- tee, the Executive Team and Board members. The Vail com- munity and Town of Vail staff were also involved in this planning process. Master planning for a medical center is unique to other land development master planning processes. A master planning effort for a hotel or commercial development may typically involve defining the potential "building envelope" of a site and then working to "fill the envelope" with buildings. Master plan- ning for Vail's hospital was based on a strategic, "inside -out" approach, rather than "outside -in" This is defined as a method for determining the real operational needs of the hospital, and then responding to those needs with the physical plan. An underlying theme for the expansion plans envisioned for VVMC is the "decompression" of spaces — to provide larger or more efficient spaces for medical services that are designed specifi- cally to improve healthcare services (as opposed to increasing capacities of such spaces). Another major influence in the master planning process that is unique to medical centers, and specifically to VVMC, is sequenc- ing of construction. It is essential that construction can be sequenced without disrupting on-going patient care. For exam- ple, because the western -most portions of the campus include the most serviceable buildings, these areas will be expanded in initial construction and the older buildings on the east side of the campus will be addressed after west wing improvements are completed. The Master Plan process was organized and executed in five major stages: 1. Project initiation, confirm goals, drivers, and LEAN Process improvement 2. Analysis of existing facilities, site issues, and operations 3. Develop Master Plan level space requirements/ projections 4. Develop conceptual Master Plan alternatives 5. Finalize the Master Plan and define a road map for future implementation. Master Planning Process Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3 Activity 4 Activity 5 Prgecl Inmation Facilities tnventorty Master plan space Master plan haler Ka, Confirm Goals7' nwrsl and EvNuation projections! Wlemal ves sdulron LEM Process Impravertry t January 2015 171 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 3. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS AND MASTER PLAN GOALS MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A key step in Stage 1 was identifying the major goals and objec- tives for the project. This was accomplished through collabora- tive work sessions with the entire planning team. The goals and objectives addressed internal, external, operational and eco- nomic considerations, and were prioritized and categorized in the following areas: Site Planning Major changes to the layout and design of VVMC, including, but not limited to, a new main entrance and a new Emergency Department, improving loading facilities, expanding parking and consideration of the helipad location were addressed in this category. 2. Functional/Organizational These goals and objectives primarily addressed internal considerations and identified a number of improvements to the organization and overall efficiency of the campus. 3. Master Planning This focus of goals and objectives was to ensure that the Master Plan included flexibility to respond to future conditions and implementation strategies. 4. Economic Sustainability, operational costs, long-term maintenance and energy costs and implementation strategies were some of the internal goals and objectives addressed in this category. Each of these four categories included five or more statements that articulated specific goals to be addressed in the Master Plan. At the conclusion of this process the following ten goals were identified as the primary goals and objectives to be addressed in the future expansion plan of VVMC: • Relocate the main entrance to VVMC to South Frontage Road • Modify service vehicle access to a concealed loading zone • Relocate Emergency Department and ambulance traffic to South Frontage Road • Relocate helipad with direct connection to Emergency Department, and with sensitivity to neighbors • Provide adequate and convenient parking for patients, visitors and staff • Improve operational efficiencies through proper sizing and adjacencies • Accommodate patients in the most appropriate setting (and with privacy) • Optimize access and way -finding for patients and visitors • Create a flexible framework to accommodate future unforeseen changes • Accommodate appropriate medical office space on campus While most of the goals and objectives identified above are inter- nal to how VVMC operates, a number of critical external consid- erations were also identified during the master planning process. Many of these same external considerations were identified by Town of Vail staff as "issues or considerations" to be addressed during the master planning process. January 2015 181 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 3. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS AND MASTER PLAN GOALS Town of Vail identified the following 13 development objectives to be addressed in the VVMC Master Plan: 1. Helipad/emergency air service to the hospital site. 2. On-site loading and delivery facilities 3. Ambulance access to and from the site. 4. Vehicle access that uses South Frontage Road for primary access. 5. Minimize vehicle trips on West Meadow Drive 6. North/south pedestrian circulation through the site. 7. Middle Creek riparian corridor. 8. Provide on-site parking in full compliance with the parking requirements. 9. Define appropriate location for vehicle access off of South Frontage Road. 10. Potential for VVMC use of Lot 10 and/or the Town's municipal center site. 11. Zoning considerations. 12. Identify future growth and expansion opportunities to ensure the community, long-term healthcare needs are met. 13. Screening of mechanical equipment. VVMC's goals and objectives for the expansion of the campus align directly with the thirteen objectives that have been raised by the Town. The manner in which VVMC expansion plans implement or address master plan goals and the issues raised by the Town are described in subsequent chapters of the Plan. Where appropriate, discussion of specific elements of the Mas- ter Plan begins with a statement describing the underlying goal to be addressed by expansion plans. In some cases the Mas- ter Plan includes a variety of potential solutions for how a par- ticular goal may be achieved. In other cases the Plan outlines fairly specific solutions to how a particular goal is achieved. In either case, final decisions on specific improvements to be implemented by expansion plans will be determined during the PEC's review of CUP applications. It is assumed that specific development plans proposed for VVMC will reflect the solutions outlined in this Plan. Howev- er, it is not the intention of this Master Plan to limit flexibility or to otherwise preclude potential solutions (not included in this Plan) for achieving the goals of this Master Plan. Alterna- tive solutions for addressing specific elements of expansion plans may be considered by the PEC during the review of CUP applications provided they appropriately address the goals for specific elements of the plan and the overall goals and objec- tives of this Master Plan. Proposals deemed to conform to applicable elements of this Master Plan will have a greater expectation of obtaining project approvals than those that do not. VVMC AND EVERGREEN LODGE POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGE The idea of a potential land exchange between VVMC and Evergreen Lodge evolved during the Town's deliberation of this Master Plan. This discussion occurred for a number of reasons - the Lionshead Redevelopment Master Plan includes a section on the Evergreen Lodge which discusses the poten- tial for a land exchange with VVMC, the two properties share a significant common boundary, and the adjacency of these two large parcels all raise the question of how a land exchange and/or coordination between these two properties could ben- efit the redevelopment of this area of Vail. January 2015 191VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 3. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS AND MASTER PLAN GOALS VVMC and Evergreen Lodge have evaluated the potential of a land exchange and concluded that a number of benefits to both properties and to the broader community could be realized by exchanging portions of their properties. Chapter 10 of this plan describes the basic elements of a potential land exchange, summarizes elements of VVMC's expansion plans that would be influenced by an exchange and addresses how decisions on the land exchange relate to the overall time line for expansion of VVMC. While a land exchange with the Evergreen Lodge is a concept that has potential, final decisions have not been made on whether an exchange will occur. For master planning purposes the land exchange is presented as a "master plan alterna- tive" for VVMC and final decisions on the land exchange will be made in the future. This master plan presents two alternatives for VVMC's future expansion - a "non -land exchange" alterna- tive and a "land exchange" alternative. With the exception of Chapter 10, the balance of this master plan is based on the assumption that there will not be a land exchange. Chapter 10 addresses how VVMC expansion plans could change with a land exchange. Both alternatives present viable options for the future rede- velopment of VVMC and each alternative is equally capable of achieving the Town's development objectives for this area of Town. January 2015 1101VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS This section of the Master Plan provides an overview of: Building expansions planned for VVMC The main "influences" in the overall site planning of the project Architectural/site design and planning considerations relative to VVMC expansion plans EXPANSION PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS VVMC currently has +/-207,000sf of gross floor area (exclusive of parking garages). Expansion plans will increase square footage by just under 50%, with the total square footage of the campus growing to +/-300,000sf. Expansions will occur in three primary areas — additions to the West Wing, construction of an entirely new East Wing and construction of a new helipad building on the north side of the campus along South Frontage Road. West Wing Expansion The focal point of the +/-45,000 sf expansion planned for the West Wing is the addition of a new fourth floor. This new floor will provide space for The Steadman Philippon Research Institute and The Steadman Clinic. Smaller multi-level expansions are also planned at the south and west sides of the West Wing. In addi- tion to new square footage, interior spaces throughout the West Wing will be re -organized and provide increased space for surgery suites, Howard Head Sports Medicine, a Cardiac Catheterization Lab and other uses. Refer to figure 8 on page 15 for a graphic rep- resentation of the West Wing Expansion. IR�IMmayi91i The existing East Wing of the hospital will be demolished and replaced with a new building of +/-45,000 sf. Located below this new building will be a multi-level parking structure which will be accessible from South Frontage Road and will provide the major- ity of all on-site parking. The south half of the new East Wing will include three levels. The lowest level (ground level at West Meadow Drive) will include an enclosed loading/delivery facil- ity and a central utility plant. The second level will be devoted to new Emergency and Imaging Departments. The upper level will accommodate the main hospital entry, admissions and other hospital functions. New Emergency Helipad Building The Emergency Helipad Building will be located at the northern side of the campus along South Frontage Road. While the primary purpose of this building is to accommodate an on-site helipad (see Chapter 8 for additional discussion of the helipad), the building presents an opportunity to create approximately four levels of useable square footage for VVMC. The useable square footage potential of this building is estimated to be +/- 12,000 A Refer to figure 9 on page 15 for a graphic representation of the New East Wing and new Emergency Helipad Building. MAIN "INFLUENCES" IN SITE PLANNING OF FUTURE EXPANSIONS A number of factors influenced the overall site planning of future expansions to VVMC. Examples of these are the specific program- matic elements of the expansion plans, the internal relationships of new and expanded uses to other uses within the campus, and how the project can be constructed while maintaining hospital op- erations. Aside from these considerations, the single most impor- tant influence in the overall design of Master Plan improvements is moving VVMC's "Front Door" to South Frontage Road. Bringing vehicular access to this location became a driver based on the fol- lowing design rationale: The main entrance to the hospital needs to be proximate to where patients and guests arrive at the campus. Vehicle access off of South Frontage Road necessitates relocating the main entrance (and key January 2015 1111VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS hospital functions such as admissions) to the East Wing. Moving ambulance arrival to the new South Frontage Road access is proposed to address a major community goal of removing emergency vehicles from West Meadow Drive. This change necessitates that the new Emergency Department be located within the East Wing. A new Emergency Department creates the need for the new Imaging Department to be in the East Wing. Given the scope of new hospital functions that will be located within the East Wing, the east end of the campus became the logical location for structured parking. While other factors were considered in the overall site planning of future expansion plans, the location of the new VVMC entry was a major influence in the design of the new campus. Construction Sequencing A major consideration in the design and construction sequence of future expansion plans is to ensure the on-going operation of the hospital during construction. This is the main reason why VVMC expansion will start with construction of the West Wing. Devel- opment of the West Wing will create new space to allow for the consolidation of a number of existing uses. This consolidation will free up existing space on the campus that can then accommodate existing uses currently located in the East Wing (uses that will be displaced during the demolition and re -construction of the East Wing). Covenant Restrictions and other Conditions The VVMC campus is encumbered by restrictive covenants that address the use of the property and establish limitations on build- ing location, building height and other site development consider- ations. In 1989 a number of restrictions on the design and development of VVMC property were established by covenants for the benefit of the Evergreen Lodge. These covenants impose significant limi- tations on where new buildings can be constructed on the cam- pus and are a major influence on how VVMC can expand in the future. The general building massing of expansion plans conform to the limitations prescribed by these covenants. Vail Resorts donated the land for the hospital to VVMC with the condition that the land be used for "medical services". Violation of this condition could, at Vail Resorts discretion, result in this land reverting back to Vail Resorts. SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The following outlines planning and design considerations relative to specific elements of the VVMC expansion plans. On the follow- ing page is Figure 5, a conceptual site plan depicting expansion plans contemplated by this Master Plan. Building Massing GOAL The massing (and scale) of hospital expansions to be responsive and sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood. A number of factors influenced the building massing of expan- sions to VVMC, including the structural capacity of existing build- ings to handle additions, internal spatial relationships of existing and future hospital uses, relationships to surrounding buildings in the neighborhood and conformity with applicable Town stan- dards. As mentioned above, a number of covenant restrictions established by a 1989 land use agreement with the Evergreen Lodge directly influence design options available to VVMC. January 2015 1121 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Middle k Corridor Liquid oxygen LargqtruI P. nt a�crt, delivery to Wesi 1...t i / Redcsislwd i parking loo y Central West Wing Wing Access control f —� D D u n f Fig. S Conceptual Site Plan of VVMC expansion. 1 elilx,rt Building — \— New Frnnt Dour to VVMC j Medical ! Professional ' Building r - East Wing 7 ---~ea / I clivery Facility VVMC Redevelopment Master Plan I Conceptual Site Plan Vail, Colorado w116� January 2015 1131 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Figure 6 on page 14 provides a general indication of the building footprint and massing of expansions contemplated by the Master Plan. The building height and massing of VVMC should be con- sistent with existing and potential building heights immediately proximate to VVMC and in the vicinity. A number of architectural approaches can be incorporated into the design of the new fourth floor of the West Wing to reduce the scale of the building. Foremost among these should be the use of extensive glazing on the fourth floor to create a lighter, more re- cessed appearance. A mansard roof could also be used to soften the roofline of the building. The West Wing also includes a small expansion along Meadow Drive, this new space is essential to the efficient functioning of this portion of the hospital. This expan- sion presents an opportunity to create interest along the street by varying the building facade along West Meadow Drive. Building off -sets and the use of varied, but related exterior wall materials and fenestration should be used along the entire facade of West Meadow Drive. The massing and scale of the new East Wing should be consistent with building heights allowed by the existing zoning of surround- ing properties. Fenestration, roof forms, variations in wall planes, use of building materials and building stepbacks can be used to achieve compatibility with the neighborhood and to soften the buildings relationship to the street. The Helipad Building is designed to accommodate an on-site helipad at a height that will not impact the development potential of neighboring properties. At a height of +/-75', the building be- neath the helipad can accommodate approximately 4 floor levels that can provide space for VVMC uses. The height of this build- ing should be consistent with that of other buildings along South Frontage Road. In order to reduce the scale of this building and to more sensitively integrate it with the site, consideration should be given to a "stepped building form" of varied building height. The conceptual massing diagrams (Figures 7, 8 and 9) on page 15 provide a general indication of the massing of the existing campus and the West Wing and East Wing/Helipad Building expansions. r 6-8 levels ' € fid" •�F 11 B €M1dding iunal 5-S uiAdnn7al tit'ca. Yung C- �� leve-- -\ 41—k 31 aefr 1•art Whg - levelS „ x�' leve 1 Jl 2-3 Levels? 1 r ,levels; 6 - Building heights surrounding VVMC and building heights of proposed VVMC expansions. January 2015 1141 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Fig. 7 - Existing VVMC Campus powwwomm -qqqqq 0 a� `-,�. J'1 � Fig. 8 - West Wing Expansion Fig. 9 - East Wing/Helipad Building Expansion January 2015 15 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Building Relationship to Meadow Drive GOAL To establish an appropriate physical and visual relationship be- tween the hospital and the pedestrian corridor along West Meadow Drive by use of effective building design, architecture and landscape improvements. VVMC shares an important "public edge" with West Meadow Drive. The relocation of VVMC's main entry to South Frontage Road will provide a major benefit to West Meadow Drive and the pedestrian/biking experience along this corridor by dramatically reducing the volume of vehicle trips on this street. Other consid- erations to be addressed in the design of building expansions that will enhance the campus' relationship to West Meadow Drive include: • Off -sets in building facades along West Meadow Drive and the East Wing to avoid continuous wall planes • Variation of building heights • Maintain and enhance where appropriate, landscaping between VVMC buildings and the street and adjacent properties • Introducing outdoor spaces (such as seating areas) in order to create interest and activity along the street • Maintaining the existing West Meadow Drive sidewalk and enhancing this corridor where appropriate • Public art • Potential relocation of Town bus stop These and other detailed design considerations will be addressed during subsequent steps in the review process. Relevant provi- sions of the Town of Vail Streetscape Master Plan Addendum will be considered in the design of site and landscape improvements along West Meadow Drive. Varied root heights and building offsets Enclosed along Meadow Drive Loading/Service Facililty Potentia g or _ dining Patin _ New pedestrian Larnl e}re - connection to frontage road New pedestrian Landscape access to hospital screening at existing bus stop VVM eadow Drivel Streetscap Diagram Fig. 10 - Existing land uses surrounding VVMC. January 2015 1161 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Architecture GOAL To integrate the design of new buildings and expansion areas with existing portions of the hospital so as to create a varied but uni- fied architectural expression. The implementation of the Master Plan provides a significant op- portunity for improvement and modernization to the architecture of the campus. The present building is a conglomeration of older buildings on the east and west ends of the campus, with a mod- ern addition in the central portion. Expansion of the West Wing will address the existing 1980 fagade. The materials and forms anticipated for this expansion should be consistent with those used in the 2001 Central Wing addition, including natural stone and complimentary metal panel detailing. Window frames should be consistent with these materials and the amount of glazing should be balanced with the need for patient privacy. For exam- ple, on the new 4th level the use of more extensive glazing should be explored to take advantage of natural light and views, and to create a lighter, more recessed appearance at the very top of the building. The new East Wing should be articulated in a similar fashion, utilizing a stepped massing, from bottom to top. The use of varying materials can allow for further reduction of the visual massing of the building. Mechanical Systems One of the major goals of the VVMC Master Plan is to replace its aging utility components with a new Central Utility Plant. In order to minimize noise, odor and other impacts to the neighborhood, the plant will be enclosed within the East Wing on the ground level, behind the service enclosure and away from West Meadow Drive. This area will house heavy equipment including boilers, compressors, and emergency generators. Once East Wing con- struction is complete, existing mechanical equipment located at the southwest corner of the campus along Meadow Drive, shall be removed. New rooftop air -handling units and air-cooled chillers shall be screened (and painted to match roof materials) in a fashion that is consistent with the mechanical screen located above the 2001 Addition, whereby only the metal roofing form is visible from the sides of the buildings. Mechanical noises generated by this equip- ment will be largely contained and reflected above these enclo- sures, as opposed to directly across the roof. Pedestrian Circulation GOAL To provide safe and efficient pedestrian circulation within and through the VVMC campus that meets the needs of hospital users and the broader community. The primary pedestrian access to and from VVMC is West Mead- ow Drive. This shared vehicle/bike/pedestrian corridor is heavily used and provides a key link between Vail Village and Lionshead. Relocating the hospital's main entrance to South Frontage Road will greatly improve the safety and aesthetics of the street by sig- nificantly reducing traffic volumes. This will provide a substantial benefit to those who use this corridor, to neighboring residential uses and to the entire Vail community. A dedicated pedestrian entry to the new Emergency Department will be provided along West Meadow Drive. This entry should be located next to the Town's existing west -bound in -town bus stop. January 2015 1171 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 4. OVERVIEW OF EXPANSION PLANS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A north/south pedestrian corridor shall be constructed along the east end of the campus, providing a new connection for pedestri- ans between South Frontage Road and West Meadow Drive. It is a goal that this pedestrian corridor be ADA compliant. Improve- ments to the Frontage Road associated with VVMC's new Front Door will include sidewalks along the south side of South Front- age Road. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for pedestrian circulation. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. Middle Creek GOAL To address existing site conditions along VVMC-s boundary with Middle Creek in order to minimize potential impacts from surface drainage on the water quality and the adjacent riparian habitat along the creek. The VVMC's existing surface parking lot at the west end of the campus is located adjacent to Middle Creek and the adjoining riparian corridor. The existing relationship between the creek corridor and the parking lot is less than ideal. The existing park- ing lot extends into the stream tract (owned by Eagle River and Sanitation District) and surface drainage from the lot is not well defined. While no major changes are contemplated to this por- tion of the site at this time, improvements to the relationship of the parking lot and Middle Creek should be made, specifically with respect to the managing the quality of water that runs from the lot into the creek. VVMC will evaluate potential improvements to the parking lot's relationship with Middle Creek during the development of detailed improvement plans. Potential improvements in- clude the introduction of "best management practices" to im- prove the quality of water that runs off of the existing surface parking lot. Examples of these types of improvements include: • Re -grading the parking lot or installing gutters to prevent drainage from flowing directly into the creek • Installation of oil/sand separators or bio-swales to clean run-off before it flows from the site • Installation of riparian vegetation along VVMC lands adjacent to the creek • Implementation of "creek sensitive" snow removal/ storage practices • Better defined and demarcated parking areas Proposed improvements should comply with any adopted policies or regulations with regard to the preservation and improvement of the Gore Creek and its tributaries. An opportunity may exist to create a stronger physical and visual connection between VVMC and Middle Creek, with the introduction of trails , seating areas and other passive uses. Any use of the Middle Creek corridor for aesthetic or passive purposes, however, will need to be coordinated with the land owner and should be subordinate to the preservation of the riparian corridor and its inherent natural character. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Ever- green Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for Middle Creek. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. January 2015 1181 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 5. VVMC"S NEW `FRONT DOOR ; MEADOW DRIVE, DELIVERY/SERVICE GOAL Remove the vast maiority of VVMC-generated traffic from West Meadow Drive. Design and manage loading and service facilities and functions to meet the needs of VVMC while at the same time minimizing Potentially adverse impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and on West Meadow Drive. One of the key elements of this Master Plan is to establish South Frontage Road as the primary vehicular access to VVMC. Estab- lishing VVMC's "Front Door" at South Frontage Road has been a long-standing goal of the Town of Vail. Through their internal master planning process the VVMC team also defined this as a Master Plan goal. The reason for this is quite simple — Meadow Drive is a heavily used pedestrian corridor and reducing the number of cars on this road will greatly improve the aesthetics and safety of this pedestrian corridor. This section of the Master Plan addresses the impact of this improvement on West Meadow Drive and VVMC delivery and service functions. THE NEW FRONT DOOR AND WEST MEADOW DRIVE Re -locating VVMC's main access to South Frontage Road will dra- matically improve conditions on West Meadow Drive by shifting VVMC traffic to the South Frontage Road. Currently VVMC-gener- ated traffic on West Meadow Drive includes the following users: Patients and guests Ambulances/emergency vehicles Delivery and service vehicles VVMC vehicles (employee vans, couriers, etc.) Of particular significance are the 116 parking spaces in the West Lot, 106 of which have historically been used by patients and guests. These spaces typically "turnover" 6-8 times per day and on a peak day these spaces can generate from 1,200 to 1,700 trips (one in/one out) on West Meadow Drive. All of these trips will shift to South Frontage Road upon construction of the East Wing and the new Front Door (at which time the existing access drive to the West Lot on West Meadow Drive will be controlled). In addition, ambulance traffic and the majority of VVMC vehicles will access VVMC via the new Front Door. This means that the only VVMC-generated traffic on West Meadow Drive will be deliv- ery and service vehicles. The October 10, 2014 memorandum by TurnKey Consulting LLC quantified the existing VVMC delivery and service traffic on West Meadow Drive. On a peak day these uses generate 56 total trips on West Meadow Drive. Based on actual traffic counts on Octo- ber 3, 2014, West Meadow Drive had 394 background trips and an estimated 180 bus trips, or 574 total trips. The 56 delivery/ service trips to VVMC represent 9% of the total daily traffic on West Meadow Drive. Relative to VVMC traffic only and assuming on a typical peak day 1,400 patient and guest trips travel on West Meadow Drive, the new Front Door will shift 96% of all existing VVMC traffic to South Frontage Road. EXISTING DELIVERY AND SERVICE FUNCTIONS VVMC's existing delivery and service functions are handled in a small, open-air facility at the southeast corner of the campus immediately adjacent to West Meadow Drive. The loading area is large enough to accommodate two mid-sized trucks and also includes a trash/dumpster area. On occasion the number of load- ing and service vehicles using the facility at any one time exceeds its capacity. Portions of the loading area are screened by fencing. However, there is currently no delineation between the loading January 2015 1191VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 5. VVMC"S NEW `FRONT DOOR ; MEADOW DRIVE, DELIVERY/SERVICE area and the adjoining sidewalk, nor is there a clear demarca- tion between the road, the sidewalk and the loading area. These conditions make it difficult to manage where trucks stage while making deliveries. The limited size of the area also requires some trucks to back onto Meadow Drive, creating safety con- cerns along this heavily travelled pedestrian roadway. VVMC has a wide variety of delivery and service needs that are essential to the operation of its facility and vital to providing quality patient care. Deliveries to VVMC occur three different ways. Most deliveries are made by vendors who deliver directly to the Vail campus. VVMC also has a down -valley facility in Gyp- sum where medical and surgical supplies are warehoused and delivered daily to the Vail campus by VVMC vans on an "as need- ed" basis. Finally, a third party contractor makes daily deliveries of medical and surgical supplies from a warehouse in Denver. The October 10, 2014 memorandum by TurnKey Consulting LLC summarized loading and service traffic to VVMC. This data was based on actual truck counts over a two week period. On aver- age 24 delivery and service vehicles serve VVMC each day (re- sulting in 48 total trips on West Meadow Drive). These 24 trips include vendor vehicles, VVMC courier vans and service vehicles (i.e. mechanical or plumbing contractor). On the "peak day" (Mondays) on average 28 service and delivery vehicles serve VVMC. The majority of vendor deliveries are made in mid-sized trucks (SU -30) or smaller. Typically only nine deliveries each week are made by larger trucks (articulated vehicles, WB -40 or larger trucks). On rare occasions larger semi -trucks service VVMC. Examples of these include the delivery of new beds (that may occur once each year or two), a mobile imaging truck, and the periodic need for a temporary generator to service the hos- pital. ALTERNATIVES TO DELIVERY AND SERVICE One of the main goals of the Master Plan for VVMC is to establish a new Front Door at South Frontage Road and in doing so remove as much traffic as possible from West Meadow Drive. VVMC generates a variety of different types of vehicular trips — delivery trucks, service vehicles, patients, guests, employees, vendors and emergency vehicles. Each of these users has its own unique design considerations for how it is accommodated. While expan- sion plans will establish a new Front Door at South Frontage Road, due to a number of factors, not all types of vehicle trips generated by VVMC can or should be accommodated at this location. This raises the question of which VVMC vehicle trips should be shifted to the new Front Door and which trips should remain on West Meadow Drive. Providing delivery vehicle access to VVMC from South Frontage Road is problematic for a number of reasons: • Limited site area along South Frontage Road, coupled with need to accommodate vehicle access, hospital drop-off and helipad in this area • Spatial requirements of an enclosed loading facility and turning radius requirements of delivery trucks, • Grade changes between South Frontage Road and the subject site (>20'), and • Creating an optimal organizational relationship between a loading facility and other existing and future uses a within the campus. For the reasons cited above, delivery vehicles should continue to use West Meadow Drive to access VVMC with all other traffic ac- cessing VVMC via the new Front Door. This reduction in vehicular traffic, coupled with a well-designed and properly managed de - January 2015 1201 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 5. VVMC"S NEW `FRONT DOOR ; MEADOW DRIVE, DELIVERY/SERVICE livery facility will balance the operational needs of VVMC while providing a major community benefit to West Meadow Drive. VVMC DELIVERY AND SERVICE FACILITY The following design and management parameters address de- sign, safety, aesthetics, noise, odor, congestion and other con- siderations relative to service and delivery functions at VVMC. VVMC service and delivery will be accommodated by a new, enclosed delivery facility on the south side of the East Wing and with provisions for larger truck deliveries in the West Parking lot. The standards below are intended to establish expectations for the design and management of delivery functions. Relevant provisions of Chapter 12-10, Off Street Parking and Loading, and Section 12-9C-5, Development Standards, Vail Town Code will also be considered in the review of subsequent development applications. Each of the parameters below shall be addressed by detailed designs and a management plan to be submitted as a part of the Conditional Use Permit process. As an element of a future CUP approval, all aspects of the management plan will be enforceable by the Town. The design and management of a delivery facility that conforms to these parameters, as determined by the PEC, shall ensure the compatibility of the delivery facility with the surrounding residential neighborhood and with the pedestrian nature of West Meadow Drive. Enclosed Delivery Facility Design Parameters • All delivery docks and delivery activity shall be located inside the building • The number of bays within the facility should be between 3-4 and accommodate turning movements within the facility for SU -30 trucks. 2-3 additional bays should be provided for smaller trucks and service vehicles. January 2015 Trash and recycling facilities shall be enclosed and located inside the building Streetscape and landscape adjacent to the loading facility should be designed to define distinct spaces for pedestrians and trucks and should discourage truck parking on West Meadow Drive. The access drive to the loading facility shall be adequately screened with landscaping Delivery Facility Management Plan • Outline the role/responsibility of the Delivery Facility Manager Establish protocol for how the facility will be managed (hours of operation, coordinating times of deliveries, managing the size of trucks that deliver to VVMC, accommodating periodic deliveries by larger trucks, servicing the US Bank Building, etc.) Establish "rules of the facility", i.e. no backing onto West Meadow Drive, no parking on West Meadow Drive, keeping door to facility closed, ensuring the area remains free of trash and debris, etc. The West Lot Design Parameters • Provisions to accommodate oxygen deliveries • Provide dedicated space suitable to accommodate the delivery from WB -40 or larger truck that will not encumber or block parking spaces (this provision is not applicable to liquid oxygen delivery) • Provide parking for VVMC service vehicles (to be accessed from the South Frontage Road) The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for Delivery and Service. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 6. TRAFFIC/SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD GOAL Collaborate with neighboring properties to define and imple- ment improvements to South Frontage Road that will provide safe and efficient site access to VVMC, the Town Hall site and the Evergreen Lodge. A Traffic Impact Study has been completed by TurnKey Consult- ing LLC. This study evaluates the traffic impacts of new develop- ment at VVMC and other changes contemplated by this Master Plan, including but not limited to the creation of a new Front Door along South Frontage Road. An executive summary of the study is found in the appendix of this Plan. Figure 11, The Con- ceptual Circulation Plan on the following page depicts proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns for VVMC. Assumptions on potential South Frontage Road improvements (all of which are subject to approval by the Colorado Depart- ment of Transportation), VVMC expansion plans and other traffic -related operational changes at VVMC that were consid- ered in the traffic study included the following: • A two-lane round -about designed to facilitate right -in/ right -out site access to VVMC, the Evergreen Lodge and the Town Hall site, on South Frontage Road • VVMC vehicular access off South Frontage Road will be right-in/right-out only • Evaluate if emergency vehicle access to VVMC is appropriate and approvable via the new main access off of South Frontage Road, including westbound left turn into VVMC • Access to the West Lot Surface Parking and the East Wing parking structure will be provided from VVMC's new main access off of South Frontage Road • Access to the new East Parking Structure and the West Surface Lot will be provided via the new main access off of South Frontage Road During the construction of the East Wing, 69 parking spaces in the US Bank Building will be temporarily accessed via West Meadow Drive (subject to coordination with neighboring property owners) Access from the US Bank Building to remain one-way out bound only. Maintain roundabout Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better The performance of the South Frontage Road roundabout, the Frontage Road/VVMC access point and the Vail Road/Meadow Drive intersection were evaluated by the Traffic Impact Study. Based on analysis by TurnKey Consulting Inc. and Felsburg Holt Ullevig (retained by the Town of Vail), each of these intersections performed at a level well above minimum Town standards for both level of service and delay. An updated traffic study for VVMC will be provided with subse- quent stages of the development review process. FRONTAGE ROAD ACCESS IMPROVEMENT STUDY The Town of Vail took the lead on a conceptual design study of future road and access improvements to South Frontage Road. The participants in this process include the Town, representatives from the Evergreen Lodge and VVMC. Each of these organizations is contemplating development of their property and the primary goal of this effort is to collaboratively define a plan for access improvements along South Frontage Road that will accommodate access to each property. It is anticipated that over time each of the three properties will be limited to right-in/right-out access off the South Frontage Road improvements. This is due to future growth in background traf- fic on South Frontage Road and the proximity of access points for January 2015 1221 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan Corridor �POEM C. TRAFFIC/SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD rz-- Bus Stop_ I ■ M access —Bus Stop Fig. 11 - Pedestrian and vehicular circulation around VVMC. January 2015 1231 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan WMC Master Plan Conceptual Circulation Plan Vail, Colorado C. TRAFFIC/SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD rz-- Bus Stop_ I ■ M access —Bus Stop Fig. 11 - Pedestrian and vehicular circulation around VVMC. January 2015 1231 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 6. TRAFFIC/SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD each of the three properties. It is assumed that a roundabout will be necessary to allow vehicles to turn around in order to access each of these three properties. The focal point of this study was to evaluate alternative locations and designs for a roundabout. It is assumed that all three parties will benefit from a roundabout and that each property will financially participate in the solution. Topography, limited right-of-way width and site conditions along South Frontage Road present significant design and construction challenges and the sequencing of when the improvement is constructed relative to when each of the three parcels re -develop is also an important consideration. Over ten alternative designs and locations for a roundabout were evaluated. In addition, non -roundabout solutions that facilitated necessary turning movements were evaluated but these were dropped from consideration. The preferred location of a round- about is shown on Figure 12 below. This improvement is located predominantly within the South Frontage Road right-of-way, however a portion of the roundabout is located over the "B line" (an internal control boundary of the interstate highway system) on Federal Highway Administration (FWHA) land. This concept is in the process of being presented to the Colorado Department of Transportation and FWHA. Tgreen access o be removed p 1i1fry `f i ,i� Leff turn for --- _ emergency vehicles VVMC�� - _ E: n Lry �'00' - -`ter-; ' �J� VVMC I ECJ I ` 0V Frontage Road .� 3 _ ,Conceptual Iran rovement Plan Fig. 12 - Conceptual design of South Frontage Road access improvements. January 2015 1241 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan C. TRAFFIC/SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD Subject to CDOT approvals, construction of the roundabout will occur after completion of the East Wing and VVMC's new Front Door at the South Frontage Road. This construction sequencing allows for the existing helipad to remain (it will be displaced by construction of the roundabout) until such time the new heliport building is operational. During this period of time, interim access improvements to the South Frontage Road will be necessary in order to facilitate access to VVMC. A traffic analysis of this interim improvement has been completed to ensure that the intersection will perform at acceptable levels. A copy of this analysis is found in the appendix of this plan. This ab'4 ergreen existing P ' East Entry 4- "74 interim improvement will provide acceptable turning movements into and out of VVMC. It is considered an "interim improvement" because over time a roundabout will be needed due to growth in background traffic coupled with the anticipated future redevelop- ment of the Evergreen and Town Hall site. Figure 13 below is a conceptual design of these improvements. Major features of these interim improvements are a west bound left -turn lane to serve VVMC and a slight re -alignment to the entry to the Town Hall site (that will maintain the left turn movement out of this site). Shaded area indicates extent 0 road work -Relocated TOV Entry New VVMC Entry Right out only from US Bank VVMC Interim Access _ = Conceptual Plan Fig. 13 - Conceptual design of interim access to VVMC. January 2015 1251 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan % PARKING GOAL To increase the supply of on-site parking to an amount that when coupled with managed parking solutions meets the needs of patients, visitors and employees of VVMC. The number of on-site parking at VVMC has for many years been acknowledged to be inadequate. Providing sufficient on- site parking is one of the primary goals of this master planning effort. The following section addresses three related topics - methodologies for determining parking requirements, existing parking conditions, and the parking demands expected from ex- pansion of VVMC. More detailed information on each of these topics will be provided in subsequent development applications. METHODOLOGIES FOR DETERMINING PARKING REQUIREMENTS Zoning code formulas used to determine parking requirements for land uses such as office, retail, etc. are fairly consistent and are almost always based on square footage. Hospitals and medical centers present a unique land use and formulas used to determine parking requirements vary widely. Gross square footage, net square footage, number of employees, number of doctors, number of patient beds and number of patient exam rooms (or some combination of the above), are examples of the different "measures" used to determine parking requirements for medical centers. The Town's methodology for determining the medical center's parking requirement is based primarily on square footage, but involves three related considerations: While in concept a square footage based formula can provide a relative indication of a facility's parking demand, the use of square footage is arbitrary in that all square footage within a medical center is treated uniformly (with respect to its intensity of use, hence parking demand). Basing parking requirements on the number of employees may be a more accurate measure for determining a facility's parking demand. The following formula is suggested as an alternative to the Town's formula: 1 space per patient bed 1 space per exam room 1 space per day shift employee Both of these methodologies have their strengths and weakness- es and as demonstrated below, both formulas provide similar parking numbers when applied to the existing campus. More importantly, both formulas provide a parking number that is very close to the total parking needs of VVMC. As further explained below, the employee -based formula is the most appropriate and accurate formula for determining the VVMC parking demand. EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS Applying the Town parking formula to the existing VVMC campus results in 870 spaces and after application of a 20% multi -use credit the parking requirement is 697 spaces. Applying the employee -based formula to the existing VVMC cam- pus results in 782 spaces and after application of a 17.5% multi- use credit the parking requirement is 645 spaces. Hospitals 1 space per patient bed While the parking requirement numbers above are very similar, 1 space/150 sf net floor area they are based on formulas and may not reflect actual parking Medical offices 1 space per 200 sf net floor area conditions, or VVMC's existing parking demand. The table below summarizes actual parking needs, or resources at VVMC: January 2015 1261 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan % PARKING 407 On-site spaces (located in West Lot, East Structure, US Bank Building) 60 Employee -issued ECO bus passes 32 Average number of employees who utilize VVMC shuttles 120 TOV/Lionshead parking and season parking passes purchased (2013/14 ski season) 53 Off-site leased spaces 672 Total spaces VVMC provides patient, guest and employee parking with a combination of on-site parking, off-site/leased parking and managed parking (employee bus pass and shuttles). These 672 "actual" spaces fall mid -way between two zoning calculations, in essence validating the accuracy of the two parking formulas. This information can also be used to define the existing park- ing deficit at VVMC. Assuming 672 is VVMC's required parking, there are currently 499 "code compliant" parking spaces (407 on-site spaces and 92 "managed" spaces), and as such the exist- ing parking deficit is approximately 173 spaces. PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF MASTER PLAN AND EXPANSION The increased parking demand from expansions contemplated by the Master Plan is expected to be relatively low. While there are plans for expansion of medical space and exam rooms that will generate more employees and increased patient activity that will result in increased parking demand, there are many improvements such as the re -designed Emergency Department that will not increase capacity or employees, hence not increas- ing parking demand. Final determination of new parking de- mand and plans for addressing this demand will be made by the PEC during the CUP process. Assuming the use of the employee -based parking formula, the increased parking demand from the Master Plan expansion is anticipated to be approximately 80 additional spaces, for a total estimated parking demand of approximately 750 spaces. Final determination of parking requirements will made during the re- view of CUP applications. Upon completion of the Master Plan expansion all required park- ing will be provided by on-site parking spaces and other "man- aged" parking solutions, in accordance with the Town's adopted parking regulations. On-site parking will be provided in the US Bank Building, the West Parking Lot, new surface spaces (created when the ambulance building is removed), and a new parking structure at the east end of the campus. As has been done in the past, managed programs will be used to satisfy a portion of VVMC's parking requirement. Parking management will include a variety of programs to include: • Continuing the use of employee shuttles • Continuing the use of the Employee ECO bus pass program • Valet Parking • Use of compact spaces • Implementation of parking management strategies to increase the efficiencies of how parking spaces are utilized During the construction of the new East Wing parking structure, interim off-site parking will be needed for approximately two years. It is anticipated that these spaces will be addressed by leasing off-site spaces and providing expanded employee shuttle and bus pass programs. Details on these programs along with additional information on the number of required parking spaces, the manner in which new parking will be provided, and parking January 2015 1271 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan % PARKING management plans will be provided with subsequent develop- ment applications. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for parking. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. January 2015 1281 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 8. EMERGENCY HELIPAD GOAL Establish an emergency helipad within the VVMC campus that is located to provide a direct internal connection to the new Emergency Department and with sensitivity to the surrounding neighborhood. EXISTING EMERGENCY HELIPAD The existing helipad that serves VVMC is located north of South Frontage Road and immediately west of the Vail Town Hall. This helipad has been used by VVMC for the past 30 years. A helipad is an essential element of a medical facility such as VVMC. On average, approximately 70 helicopter transports occur each year The vast majority of these are scheduled transports of patients from VVMC to other healthcare facilities. While the existing helipad has served its purpose in supporting emergency air transport, there are shortcomings with the current helipad and it needs to be relocated. The fundamental limitation of the existing helipad is that it requires the transfer of the patients to and from VVMC via an ambulance. The most significant implication of this is increased risk to the patient and the additional time required to transfer the patient (also adding risk). In addition, the transfer monopolizes the use of an ambulance and crew and also necessitates Police Department personnel to temporarily close South Frontage Road. None of these shortcomings would be addressed by an off-site helipad. It is for these reasons that only an on -campus helipad would improve existing conditions and meet the highest standards of patient care. The evaluation of alternative locations for the emergency helipad and recommendations for the preferred location were completed with the assistance of HeliExperts International LLC and Caycee Batterson of CLB Enterprises. The Preliminary Heliport Feasibility & Design Study Report, January 15, 2015 by HeliExperts LLC is found in the appendix of this Master Plan. EMERGENCY HELIPAD SITE ALTERNATIVES Four potential on-site helipad locations were evaluated. Depicted on Figure 14 below, these alternatives were evaluated based on the following considerations: • Safety • Patient transfer requirements to/from the Emergency Department • FAA and NFPA standards • Aircraft performance • Community Impact A ter' -- .%+li+d �� T'"t fi � g •''S"e �,�. - C ■ ` t i Fig. 14 - On-site helipad location alternatives Each of the four on-site alternatives involves rooftop solutions and each location could accommodate a helipad that conforms to applicable guidelines of the FAA Advisory Circular relative to flight paths and other aeronautical considerations. January 2015 1291 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan S. EMERGENCY HELIPAD Alternatives B and D each presents challenges with respect to their relationship to the future location of the Emergency Department and each of these locations would have significant impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. For these reasons both B and D were dropped from consideration. While Alternative C has a very convenient relationship to the future location of the Emergency Department, the flight path to this alternative location would follow the Gore Creek corridor to the west and while this flight path would conform to FAA guidelines it would have significant impacts on residential uses located along this corridor. For this reason Alternative C was dropped from consideration. Alternative A is the preferred location for the emergency helipad due to its proximity to the future location of the Emergency Department, conformance with applicable FAA guidelines, and limited impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. PROPOSED EMERGENCY HELIPAD LOCATION The proposed helipad is located adjacent to South Frontage Road on a portion of the campus that is not encumbered by the Evergreen covenant restriction. The helipad will be designed in concert with the design of VVMC's new Front Door to ensure efficient site access and circulation. The proposed location allows for an easterly flight path that would pass over the Town Hall site and then run parallel with the 1-70 corridor. The westerly flight path would follow South Frontage Road and gradually align with the 1-70 corridor. Refer to Figure 16 on page 31. At this master plan level, it is assumed that the elevation of the helipad will be approximately 75' above the top level of the existing VVMC parking structure. The helipad is set Fig. 15 - Proposed helipad location at this elevation in order to not negatively impact the future development of surrounding properties. Based on conceptual studies, with the helipad at 75' the Evergreen Lodge could develop to the maximum allowable 82.5' building height (for habitable space) anywhere within zoning or town master plan prescribed setbacks and have no impact on the western flight path of the helicopter. The Town Hall site could be developed to just over 60' and have no impact on the eastern flight path of the helicopter. In addition to a maximum allowable building height of 82.5', town zoning allows up to an additional 15' of building height for "architectural projections" such as towers, spire, cupolas, flagpoles and similar features not usable as habitable floor area. Based on conceptual studies, the majority of the Evergreen site could accommodate the maximum 15' architectural projection with no impact to the westerly flight path of the helicopter. There is, however, a corridor along the northern side of the Evergreen January 2015 1301 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan S. EMERGENCY HELIPAD Lodge in which a 15' architectural projection could impact the westerly flight path (penetrate the FAA prescribed obstruction surfaces). Solutions to address this potential situation are to elevate the helipad to eliminate the impact or for any architectural projection above 82.5' that may be proposed by the Evergreen be located to not impact the flight path and FAA obstruction surfaces. FUTURE STEPS IN THE REVIEW OF EMERGENCY HELIPAD The Town's Master Plan evaluation of the proposed helipad is the first of many steps in the review process. Following Master Plan approval, VVMC will complete additional work on the conceptual design of the helipad, coordinate with helipad users and then submit notice of the proposed helipad to the FAA. The FAA will then conduct an initial review of the proposal. At this same time, more detailed information on the design and operation of the helipad will be submitted to the Town as part of a CUP application. In addition, an Environmental Impact Report will be provided as an element of the CUP application. Fig. 16 - Proposed helicopter approach and departure flight paths. The following provisions shall be provided in the detailed design and CUP application for the helipad: 1. Installation and operation of an approved, on-site automated weather observing system (AWOS) 2. Install an aviation approved wind sock, lighting, etc. atop the new helipad building 3. Preparation and use of pilot briefing sheets and an operational training and reference manual for the VVMC emergency helipad to ensure that the emergency helicopter pilots using the emergency helipad are informed in advance of any unique conditions, circumstances, or factor that must be considered when flying in or out of Vail. 4. Preparation of an "Emergency Action Plan" Following approval of a CUP application VVMC will coordinate with the FAA on a "favorable determination of air space" for the helipad. Upon issuance of building permits and construction of the helipad, the FAA may, at their discretion, complete a final inspection of the helipad. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for the Helipad. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. January 2015 1311 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The following section addresses zoning/development review considerations and other topics relative to expansion plans envisioned by the Master Plan. Many of these topics will be addressed in greater detail during the review of subsequent development applications. EMPLOYEE HOUSING GOAL To provide employee housing consistent with provisions of Chapter 23 of the Vail Town Code. Chapter 23 - Commercial Linkage of the Town's zoning regula- tions stipulates that "commercial development or redevelop- ment shall mitigate its impact on employee housing by provid- ing Employee Housing Units (EHUs) for twenty percent (20%) of the employees generated." Further, that "employee hous- ing impacts need only be mitigated for a redevelopment that results in a greater number of employees generated from an increase in net floor area." As such VVMC's requirement is to provide housing for 20% of the new employees resulting from the proposed expansion. Chapter 23 of the Town code provides a table of employee gen- eration rates for a variety of different land uses. Hospitals and medical facilities are not included in this table. In accordance with the ordinance, in such cases it is incumbent on the appli- cant to provide documentation of employee generation antici- pated from the project. VVMC and other entities that operate within the campus (i.e. Colorado Mountain Medical, The Steadman Clinic, etc.) include approximately 550 employees. It is anticipated that as the Master Plan expansion is implemented employees will increase to approximately 610, an increase of 60 employees. By way of example, assuming 60 new employees and the Town's 20% hous- ing requirement, housing for 12 employees would be required. This housing may be in the form of dormitory; studio; or 1, 2 or 3 bedroom units. Final determination of new employee generation will be made during the CUP review process. Chapter 23 stipulates that 50% of required employee housing be located "on-site" with the provision that exceptions can be made to this requirement if any one of four findings are met. For two reasons all required employee housing will be provided off-site — residential is incompatible with the institutional uses at VVMC and the limited land area afforded by the campus is best utilized for addressing medical and related needs of VVMC. Detailed information on employee generation, the exception to the on-site requirement, and an employee housing plan will be provided in subsequent development applications. ZONING Existing zoning of the VVMC campus includes three different zone districts. The majority of the campus is zoned General Use (GU), the US Bank Building site is zoned Special Development District (SSD #23), and a portion of land along South Frontage Road (re- cently purchased from the Evergreen Lodge) is zoned Lionshead Mixed Use —1. Figure 17 on the following page depicts the zon- ing of the VVMC campus. The following summarizes the existing zoning of these three areas relative to the proposed master plan. General Use Zoning The majority of the campus is zoned GU. The purpose of the GU district is intended for use on sites with public and quasi -public January 2015 1321 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan N Mixed Use , , a I VVMC - Existing Zoning Fig. 17 - VVMC existing zoning. 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for Lionshead Mixed Use -1 Zoning. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Ex- change with Evergreen Lodge for more information. SDD Zoning VVMC purchased the US Bank Building in 2005. At that time, the - property was used as a professional office building and was zoned SD no. 23 SDD #23. Since that time, VVMC has converted many office uses within the building to medical uses or office uses directly related to VVMC. These medical uses are permissible by SDD #23. _L While the majority of the building has evolved into a medical office building, the bank use is expected to remain for the fore- seeable future. VVMC's ultimate plan is for all uses within the building to be medical -oriented and it is anticipated this will occur once the bank vacates the building. At that time it is expected that the property will be re -zoned to the GU district. rte. uses and this zone district has been the primary tool for review- ing the development of VVMC for many decades. "Healthcare facilities" are a Conditional Use in the GU District. There are no changes proposed to this zoning. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for General Use Zoning. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. Lionshead Mixed Use -1 Zoning This small portion of the VVMC campus was zoned LHMU-1 when acquired from the Evergreen Lodge. The LHMU-1 district does not allow for medical facilities, medical offices or clinics. For this reason the re -zoning of this portion of the campus to GU will be proposed as an element of future development applications. There are two reasons for not re -zoning this portion of VVMC to GU at this time. The existing bank building is physically separate from the rest of the buildings on the VVMC campus and as such there are no real regulatory complications from having two dif- ferent zone districts in place on the VVMC campus. More impor- tantly, the "banks and financial institutions" are not permitted in the GU district. Re -zoning the property to GU would make the existing bank a non -conforming use and this could create future unintended or unforeseen consequences. January 2015 1331 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS VAIL LAND USE PLAN The Vail Land Use Plan includes references to VVMC. It is intend- ed that this Master Plan supersede all reference to VVMC found in the Vail Land Use plan. The Vail Land Use Plan shall be modi- fied to create a new land use designation specific to VVMC. TOV LANDS The adjacency of Lot 10 to the west side of the VVMC campus presents a meaningful opportunity for the long-term growth of the hospital. While small in size, Lot 10 could nonetheless be a key factor in providing future hospital improvements at the west end of the campus. VVMC remains interested in working with the Town regarding the future acquisition of this parcel. Doing so could facilitate VVMC's ability to pursue expansion plans on the West Lot at some point in the future. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for TOV Lands. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Ever- green Lodge for more information. FUTURE EXPANSION POTENTIAL AT VVMC GOAL To ensure that opportunities remain to accommodate future expansions to VVMC beyond those contemplated by this Master Plan. Expansions and improvements outlined in this Master Plan are planned to meet the needs of VVMC for many years. In doing so these improvements will provide facilities that will allow VVMC to serve the community with state-of-the-art, high quality health- care. It is difficult to speculate on expansions or improvements be- yond those envisioned by this Master Plan. That said, as medical services and technology evolve over the next few decades, it is reasonable to assume that over time additional changes to VVMC will be necessary. VVMC would have two options available for future expansion and improvements to the campus: US Bank Buildi Since it was purchased by VVMC in 2005, this building has evolved into a nearly exclusive medical office building. As a part of the changes to the main hospital campus outlined by this Master Plan, the US Bank Building will be used to accommodate some uses that are currently located on the main campus. As such the building plays a key role in the overall master plan for VVMC by providing support/ancillary medical space for the hospi- tal. A significant amount of resources have gone into renovations to this building in order to facilitate these uses. Over time, it may be possible to demolish this building and redevelop it with more direct, physical integration with the main campus. This would represent one alternative for how VVMC could address future long-term needs. West Lot The West Lot is a location that could accommodate a new build- ing at some point in the future. This would likely necessitate below -grade structured parking. Access to this building (and parking) would be possible via South Frontage Road and the new main entry to VVMC. January 2015 1341 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No specific work has been done in preparing long term improve- ment/expansion plans for the West Lot or the US Bank Building. This Master Plan does, however, acknowledge how these two areas provide VVMC with options for how future unforeseen needs could be accommodated on the campus. The potential land exchange between VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge may influence VVMC's final design solutions for future ex- pansion potential. Refer to Chapter 10 —Potential Land Exchange with Evergreen Lodge for more information. January 2015 1351 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 10. POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGE WITH EVERGREEN LODGE The underlying premise of a VVMC/Evergreen land exchange is that modifying the common boundary between the two proper- ties enhances the redevelopment opportunities of both proper- ties, opportunities that would not be possible with existing parcel boundaries. Enhanced redevelopment opportunities include not just the specific development potential of each property, but also how the design and development of each site could be accom- plished to create a seamless transition between each property and to better address community -oriented goals and objectives. VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge have evaluated a potential land exchange and determined that at a conceptual level a land ex- change could provide benefits to both parties and also result in redevelopments that further the Town's development objectives. This section summarizes the main elements of a land exchange, elements of the VVMC master plan that would change in the event of a land exchange and next steps on the potential land exchange. MAIN ELEMENTS OF THE LAND EXCHANGE The concept of the land exchange involves VVMC conveying a portion of its west parking lot to the Evergreen Lodge in exchange for the easternmost corner of the Evergreen site. Land acquired by the Evergreen Lodge would be used to link the future rede- velopment of the Lodge directly to West Meadow Drive. VVMC would utilize the easternmost portion of the Evergreen site to shift the location of the helipad building and in doing so cre- ate more room for the main entry to the hospital. Figure 18, a conceptual site plan of VVMC's expansion plans with the land exchange is found on the following page. In addition to the exchange of land, there are two other signifi- cant elements of the potential land exchange. In 1989 VVMC agreed to a number of protective covenants benefitting the Ever- green Lodge that significantly restricted the future development of the VVMC site. A key element of the land exchange would involve the Evergreen Lodge releasing many of these restrictions and in doing so create future expansion opportunities beyond what is currently possible. A major focus of redevelopment plans for the Evergreen Lodge is to create a strong pedestrian connection to West Meadow Drive. A second aspect of the land exchange would involve VVMC cooperating with the Evergreen Lodge on site and landscape improvements necessary for the Evergreen Lodge to create a new public space that will establish this connection. These two considerations will provide important benefits to each property and also to the broader community. LAND EXCHANGE INFLUENCE ON VVMC REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN If the land exchange is implemented the vast majority of the ex- pansion plans outlined in this redevelopment master plan will re- main unchanged. For example, there would be no changes to the design of the West Wing (and it will remain the initial step in the construction process regardless of a land exchange), and the ma- jor elements of the East Wing will be largely unchanged. Changes to expansion plans that would result from the land exchange are relatively subtle, but none the less important to the future devel- opment of VVMC. The following highlights how specific elements of this Master Plan would be influenced by the land exchange: Pedestrian Circulation The VVMC redevelopment master plan currently includes a north/ south pedestrian connection along the eastern edge of the site. The pedestrian connection planned by the Evergreen Lodge would potentially be a better pedestrian solution and could eliminate the need for the connection at the east end of the VVMC site. This decision could be made during the CUP review of the East Wing. January 2015 1361 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 10. POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGE WITH EVERGREEN LODGE r VVMC Redevelopment Master Pian Land Exchange Conceptual Site Plan _ Vail, Colorado Figure 18 - Conceptual site plan with Evergreen land exchange. January 2015 1371 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 10. POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGE WITH EVERGREEN LODGE MiddIP CrPPk The VVMC redevelopment master plan outlines options for improving storm water run-off from the west parking lot. The land exchange would convey this portion of the VVMC site to the Evergreen Lodge. Consideration will be given to this potential change of ownership (and future development plans) when mak- ing final decisions on specific storm water improvements for the west parking lot. Delivery and Service VVMC will re-evaluate the potential for a shared facility with the Evergreen Lodge and the ability to provide delivery and service vehicle access via South Frontage Road. Parking Conveyance of a portion of the west lot to the Evergreen Lodge will remove approximately 25 parking spaces from VVMC. The loss of these spaces will need to be incorporated into the overall parking plan for VVMC. This will be addressed during the CUP process for the East Wing. Helipad Building and Entry to VVMC Acquiring a portion of the Evergreen site will allow the helipad building to shift to the northwest. This shift will create more room for the new Front Door to VVMC (vehicular circulation, pa- tient drop-off, etc.) and allow for an improved arrival experience for all hospital users. Relief to current covenant restrictions will also allow for greater flexibility in the design of the East Wing and the main entry into the hospital. Based on an initial review by HeliExperts LLC, the shift in the helipad will have no appreciable impact on the planned arrival and departure flight paths. to the General Use District so zoning is consistent with the adjoin- ing VVMC property. TOV Lands VVMC remains interested in acquiring Lot 10 from the Town of Vail. Redevelopment plans for the Evergreen Lodge, particularly with respect to the planned pedestrian connection, may influence the future use of Lot 10. As an element of the land exchange discussions, VVMC, the Evergreen Lodge and the Town of Vail will coordinate on what role, if any, Lot 10 may play in final design solutions for VVMC and the Evergreen Lodge. Future Expansion Potential If covenant restrictions are released by the Evergreen Lodge there will be a significant and very positive change to the future expan- sion potential at VVMC. Currently future expansions to VVMC beyond what is contemplated by this Master Plan are limited to the West Lot and the US Bank Building. Existing covenant restric- tions limit the height, building footprint and location of any new building in the West Lot. Covenant restrictions do not limit the redevelopment potential of the US Bank Building; however, this site is somewhat detached from the rest of the campus. While the West Lot and the US Bank Building do provide potential for future expansions to VVMC, expansions in these areas would be difficult to integrate with rest of the campus. The potential land exchange would include a significant degree of relief to existing restrictive covenants. Figure 19, the conceptual massing diagram on the following page depicts where additional building expansion could occur if covenant restrictions are modi- fied. These areas of future building expansion would be more viable to VVMC (than existing expansion potential) given their LH Mixed Use Zoning and other Zoning Considerations relationship and proximity to existing facilities. The importance of The portion of Evergreen land that may be acquired by VVMC is this covenant relief to the long-term future of VVMC will be real - currently zoned LHMP-2. If acquired, this land should be rezoned ized by the community over time. January 2015 1381 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan 10. POTENTIAL LAND EXCHANGE WITH EVERGREEN LODGE NEXT STEPS WITH LAND EXCHANGE There are two key steps with regard to making a final decision on the land exchange. The first of these is for VVMC and the Ever- green Lodge to continue their discussions on the more detailed aspects of the land exchange. The second is to coordinate with Vail Resorts. When Vail Resorts conveyed land to VVMC for the hospital the conveyance included the condition that the land be used "for purposes directly relating to medical services". If this condition is violated, the property could, at VR's option revert back to them. For the land exchange to occur, Vail Resorts will need to modify this condition such that residential/condominium use is permissible on the portion of the West Lot that would be acquired by the Evergreen Lodge. In the event the land exchange is realized, both parties would continue to coordinate on the planning and design of their re- spective projects. It is assumed that the Evergreen Lodge would initiate a planning process for their redevelopment. VVMC would proceed with the obtaining CUP approvals and initiating construc- tion of the West Wing (the West Wing is currently planned as the first sequence of construction and this would not change with or without a land exchange). VVMC would then modify detailed designs of the East Wing to reflect changes made possible by the land exchange (shifting location of helipad building and design of VVMC entry off of South Frontage Road). These detailed designs would then be submitted to the Town for review as part of a CUP application. Fig. 19 - Conceptual massing study of future VVMC infill/expansion potential with relief of existing covenant restrictions. January 2015 1391 VVMC Site Specific Redevelopment Master Plan VVMC West Wing CUP Executive Summary - Traffic & Access March 19, 2015 Master Plan Traffic Impact Study The Town of Vail (TOV) approved the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan in March 2015. As part of the review and approval process, VVMC prepared a comprehensive Traffic Impact Study (TIS) that addressed traffic impacts and mitigation for each different part of the Project construction sequencing. The TIS was prepared by Turnkey Consulting LLC and is dated 9-30-14. The full TIS is attached to this summary. West Wing Changes Affecting Traffic Flow & Site Access The following traffic -related changes will happen as part of the VVMC West Wing reconstruction. 1. Increase in building size. The West Wing will increase in size, but this will be mostly due to increasing the size of medical clinics that are currently in cramped quarters. There will be small increase in the number of patients and employees. 2. Reduction in the number of parking spaces in the West Parking Lot. There are currently 106 parking spaces in the West Lot. Construction impacts will reduce this to 97 parking spaces. 3. Change in the location of parking for various site users. During the early part of construction of the Campus West End, VVMC will change the location of parking spaces for different site users. Currently, all patron and guest parking is located in the West Parking Lot, which is accessed via the Main Entrance on West Meadow Drive. Currently, all employee and staff parking is located in the East Parking Structure, which is accessed via the gated access on the South Frontage Road Access. The current proposal is to swap these parking locations such that patrons & guests will use the South Frontage Road and park in the East Parking structure, and employees and staff will use Meadow Drive to Park in the modified West Parking Lot. There are two reasons for this change. First, patrons and guests will not need to drive through and park in a work zone. Second, this will reduce the amount of VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive. West Wing Traffic Impacts VVMC trip generation will increase slightly due to the increase in building size, but not all these trips will travel to/from the site. VVMC currently uses off-site parking to accommodate employees that cannot be accommodated by on-site parking. With the reduction of available on-site staff parking after West Wing construction, the overflow will be accommodated by off-site parking. So employee trips will increase slightly but some of these trips will not access VVMC by motor vehicle. If a scenario occurs where more patient parking is needed on-site, then additional employee parking spaces will be assigned to patient parking. This would create a need for more employee off-site parking spaces. Page 1 of 4 The net effect of the proposed changes are summarized below. The VVMC traffic volumes used in these calculations are based on traffic counts conducted on Tuesday, February 4th, 2014. These traffic counts represents a typical weekday at the VVMC during the peak winter season. • Decrease the VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive by 19% (AM peak hour), 83% (PM peak hour), and 81 % (Daily period). Increase the VVMC trips on the 1-70 South Frontage Road by 11 % (AM peak hour) and 230% (PM peak hour). The change in daily trips was not calculated, due to lack of data. The large decrease in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive is due to guest and patron parking spaces turning over more frequently than employee parking spaces. This is also the reason that the VVMC trips on the Frontage Road will increase. The following table provides more detail on the VVMC traffic volumes changes due to the proposed site changes. TABLE 1 - Change in VVMC Trips based on Parking Swap Based on traffic count data collected on Tuesda , February 4, 2014 (except as noted Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employ( surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience " 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) " 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departm( " Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 PM Daily Condition Access Parking Users Peak Hour (vpd) Comment F64 vph Main Entrance Guests & Patrons 147 1,325 1,325 vpd estimated; see Note 1 below. (West Meadow Dr) [106 spaces] Existing Trips shown are only employee trips to/from the 209 Employee Entrance Employees 111 53 Note 2 employee parking spaces in the East parking structure; trips (Frontage Road) (209 spaces] to/from the US Bank Bldg are not included. Main Entrance Employee 52 25 275 See Notes 3 & 4 below for assumptions on the trips to/from (West Meadow Dr) [97 spaces] the 97 employee parking spaces. Guests & Patrons Proposed (106 spaces] Employee Entrance AND 123 175 Note 2 (Frontage Road) Employees 103 spaces] % Chane g Main Entrance --- -19% 83% 79% VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive will DECREASE West Meadow Dr (Existing to Proposed) Employee Entrance --- 11% 230% Note 2 VVMC trips at the Frontage Road access will INCREASE (Frontage Road Notes: vph - vehicles per hour; vpd - vehicles per day 1. 24 -hr traffic counts were not collected at the Main Entrance for the winter period; only peak period traffic counts were collected. The 1,325 vpd was estimated using the ratio between the peak hour traffic counts for winter and summer (winter is 35% higher), which was then applied to the 24 -hr count from August 2013 (982 vpd) to get 1,325 vpd. 2. Due to the configuration of the Employee Entrance on the Frontage Road it was not possible to conduct 24 -hr traffic counts using automated traffic recorders; only manual peak period traffic counts were obtained at this location. 3. Calculated the # of trips to/from the 97 employee parking spaces based on a ratio of 97 to 209 (46.4%); these employee trips will be relocated to Entrance with the "parking swap". 4. 275 vpd estimated based on the following assumptions: None of the employees parking in the 97 spaces (day or night shift) leave VVMC during their shift; this assumption is based on extensive employ( surveys conducted by TurnKey Consulting during the Vail MOB traffic study and VVMC staff experience " 97 parking spaces turn over once during the day shift (97 trips IN + 97 trips OUT = 194 trips) " 40 parking spaces turn over once during the night shift (40 trips IN + 40 trips OUT = 80 trips); based on all 40 night shift employees (all departm( " Total daily trips to/from 97 employee spaces in West Parking Lot = 275 vpd (194 + 80 = 274, rounded up 275) Page 2 of 4 West Wina Traffic Mitiaation Due to the reduction of traffic on West Meadow Drive, there will not be a need for any roadway improvements at the VVMC access to West Meadow Drive, or the intersection at Vail Road. The proposed site changes will not significantly change the amount of VVMC trips traveling through the Main Vail Interchange roundabouts. The travel patterns will change in a symmetrical manner and this will not affect roundabout operations. Therefore, no changes will not be required at this intersection as part of West Wing construction. Frontage Road Mitigation Turn Key Consulting completed the traffic analysis necessary to identify the type and timing of the Interim Improvements on the Frontage Road in 2015. The following concept sketch for Interim Improvements was developed in coordination with TOV, because their municipal site access would be relocated slightly to the west of its current location. This improvement would create a 4 -leg intersection on the Frontage Road, which eliminates the current overlap of inbound left turns between the VVMC (south side) and TOV (north side) access points. EXIST. R/W LRE "PRE BEGIN RE ,. WB LRE A.14O0 CONS- - REMOVE PORTION OF A" DRAIN , -- TOE IF FIlL (TYP ADJUST SAH. NAnRGLe • MUNICIPAL CENTER r PARKING LOT E9R + « ADVERSE CROSS SLOPE ' TINDU01 INTERSECTIONURBAN RQOCA •�� ; N �'.._ � CRITERIA LOw SPEED t5Me N!y "�'V\ 0 06 } RI/RU TIE OF FILL VVMC PAMaw GARAGE `r s� GE \, EB LANE • m R « Page 3 of 4 • OF REGRADING ULL 4- CONC. CROSS PAH WB LANE PROFILE LOCATION EXIST. SLOPE DRIVEWAY ENO PROFIT RECONSTRUCTI - - 14.8%,, WB LANE STA. 4#50 9. MUNICIPAL -Ab-_TCN MEOIAH FOR FULLS_ GE \, EB LANE • m R « Page 3 of 4 The VVMC Frontage Road Access was analyzed using two different sets of South Frontage Road through -traffic volumes in order to evaluate the summer 2015 condition and the winter 2016/2016 condition. The traffic volumes IN and OUT of the VVMC access and TOV access are the same in each scenario; only the eastbound and westbound thru traffic on the South Frontage Road are different. • Scenario #1 - Summer Conditions (2013 Summer Counts forecasted to Year 2015) • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions (Year 2006 Holiday Counts forecasted to Year 2015) The traffic analysis showed the following results. • Scenario #1 — Summer Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would provide acceptable traffic operations (delay and queuing) for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. The Frontage Road thru volumes would be 71 % (AM peak Hour) and 63% (PM peak hour) lower in Scenario #1 than Scenario #2. The lower Frontage Road traffic volumes is the reason the existing access configuration would provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #1 traffic volumes. There would not be more gaps in the through traffic opposing the left turn traffic. Therefore, the Interim Improvements are not needed if the parking swap was implemented in the summer of 2015. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. • Scenario #2 — Peak Winter Conditions The existing access configuration on the Frontage Road would not provide acceptable traffic operations for the Scenario #2 traffic volumes. Therefore, the Interim Improvements would need to be constructed prior to winter season in 2015. The high volume of thru traffic on the South Frontage Road means that there are fewer gaps for in through traffic opposing vehicles turning in and out of the VVMC and TOV accesses. In addition, there are other factors that contribute to the poor traffic operations in the winter condition. First, the VVMC and Municipal Site accesses are off -set by approximately 90 -feet, which creates conflicts between inbound left turn movements at both the VVMC and TOV access points. These movements overlap and compete for the same section of center turn lane on the Frontage Road. Second, with the parking swap, the left -turn volume into the VVMC Access would increase from 26 vehicles per hour (vph) to 70 vph. The additional inbound VVMC left -turns increase the chance of conflicts between inbound VVMC and TOV left -turns in the median turn -lane. Third, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns (26 vph to 70 vph) would create westbound left -turn queues that extend back into the westbound thru lane and block thru traffic. Fourth, the increase in inbound VVMC left -turns would also cause the outbound VVMC and TOV left -turns to experience long delays (2-3 minutes or longer). This will occur because a majority of the gaps in the eastbound thru traffic would be used by the additional VVMC inbound left -turns. The Frontage Road will operate safely and efficiently during the typical (non -holiday) winter conditions upon completion of the interim improvements. It may be necessary to use temporary flagger traffic control during occasional holidays or other higher -than -normal traffic conditions. Page 4 of 4 Traffic Impact Study Prepared For: Vail Valley Medical Center Muster Plan 1-70 South Frontage Road, just west of the main Vail interchange Vail, Colorado RE Gi 37990 v September 30, 2014 2533 West Pinyon Ave -,TC1P17G Grand Junction, CO 81505 970-985-4001 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................... 1 LISTOF FIGURES................................................................................................................. 2 LISTOF TABLES................................................................................................................... 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 STUDY AREA.............................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PERIODS AND YEARS...................................................................................................................4 1.4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ASSUMPTIONS RELATED TO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT .......................................................4 1.5 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROJECT USES...................................................................................................................4 1.6 SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS............................................................................................................... 8 1.7 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................... 11 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA.............................................................................. 13 2.1 VVMC ACCESSES....................................................................................................................................................13 2.2 OTHER TRAFFIC COUNT LOCATIONS........................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION: VVMC TRAFFIC VS FRONTAGE ROAD TRAFFIC....................................................... 15 2.4 VVMC WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VS WEEKEND PEAK HOUR...................................................................................... 16 3 PROJECT TRIPS.......................................................................................................... 16 3.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION..................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION................................................................................................................................... 18 4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES........................................................... 26 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES...........................................................................................................................26 4.2 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (BACKGROUND + PROJECT)...........................................................................................29 5 TURN LANE WARRANTS AT VVMC ACCESS TO FRONTAGE ROAD ...................... 35 6 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS............................................................................. 35 6.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#1]........................................................................35 6.2 VVMC ACCESS / TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................38 6.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................40 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................ 42 7.1 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#1]........................................................................42 7.2 VVMC ACCESS / TOV ACCESS ON FRONTAGE ROAD [INTERSECTION#2]...............................................................43 7.3 VAIL ROAD AND MEADOW DRIVE [INTERSECTION#3].............................................................................................43 APPENDIX Turnfie Page 1 0 consulting. LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS List of Figures Figure1 — Vicinity Map........................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 — Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control.......................................................... 7 Figure 3 — Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes ...................................................... 14 Figure 4 — Project Trip Distribution (AM Peak Hour)............................................................. 19 Figure 5 — Project Trip Distribution (PM Peak Hour)............................................................. 20 Figure 6 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — During Construction) ................................ 21 Figure 7 — Project Trip Assignment (West End — Construction Completed) .......................... 22 Figure 8 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — During Construction) ................................. 23 Figure 9 — Project Trip Assignment (East End — Construction Completed) ........................... 24 Figure 10 — Project Trip Assignment (Build-out)................................................................... 25 Figure 11 — Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................ 27 Figure 12 — Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — During Construction) ................. 30 Figure 13 — Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — Construction Completed) .......... 31 Figure 14 — Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — During Construction) .................. 32 Figure 15 — Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — Construction Completed) ........... 33 Figure 16 — Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) ...................................................... 34 List of Tables Table 1 — Existing and Proposed Project Uses....................................................................... 5 Table 2 — Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces.................................................................. 5 Table 3 — Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] ............................................. 9 Table 4 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 20351 ....................................... 9 Table 5 — VVMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] .................. 10 Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ................................. 10 Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses .................................................... 13 Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison......................................................................................... 15 Table 9 — Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at VVMC Accesses by Group ............................. 16 Table 10 — VVMC Trip Generation Summary....................................................................... 18 Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary .................................................... ................... 18 Table 12 — Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 26 Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Rd ....................................... 35 Table 14 — Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018].......................................................... 37 Table 15 — Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies .................................... 37 Table 16 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] ......................... 38 Table 17 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] ......................... 39 Table 18 — VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] ................................... 40 Table 19 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] ......................... 40 Table 20 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] ............................... 41 Table 21 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] ............................... 42 �TurnPage 2 Consulti�nga,UC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This report documents the traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan (Project) in the Town of Vail (TOV), Colorado. The VVMC is located on the south side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road (Frontage Road) about 750 feet west of the main Vail interchange. The VVMC also has access to West Meadow Drive. See Figure 1 for the Project Vicinity Map. All land use details listed in this TIS are based on the VVMC Master Plan effort, and will be updated as the Project concept is refined. Another key assumption is a future roundabout on the Frontage Road, which would provide optimal access to each of the three adjacent properties when this area builds out. The TOV has recently been working with adjacent property owners to evaluate alternative roundabout locations and to define the preferred location for this roundabout. This TIS assumed a roundabout configuration, but the roundabout solution is dependent upon the participation of all three property owners, and is based on the assumption that each of the properties will be redeveloped at the same time. Since the timing of these projects may not occur simultaneously, VVMC evaluated Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated access options that do not include a roundabout. This TIS will be updated as necessary and resubmitted for the TOV Condition Use Permit (CUP) and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) access permit processes. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area includes the intersections listed below, which are shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the lane geometry and traffic control. Intarcarfinnc #1 Frontage Road and Evergreen Access (South Leg) (Proposed Roundabout west of VVMC Access) #2 Frontage Road and VVMC Access (South Leg) / TOV Access (North Leg) #3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive TurnKe Page 3 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was added to the Study Area because the VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction. The increase in VVMC trips at this intersection will occur because the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. The south roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange was not included in the Study Area. The 2025 Vail Transportation Plan (Vail TMP) concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at this interchange, and discussed other system -wide improvements that would help alleviate congestion at the Main Vail Interchange. 1.3 Traffic Analysis Periods and Years The traffic analysis was conducted for the periods and conditions listed below. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on traffic data from the peak summer and winter seasons. In addition, traffic volumes from the Vail TMP were used for the Frontage Road. Periods • Weekday AM Peak Hour • Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions • Year 2015 — West End (During Construction) • Year 2016 — West End (Construction Completed) • Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) • Year 2035 — Build -out (20 -year horizon) Definitions: West End improvements include approximately 40,000 SF of medical space on and around the existing West Wing of the VVMC. East End improvements include approximately 25,000 SF of net new medical space and an expanded parking structure at the east end of the Campus. 1.4 Background Traffic Assumptions Related to Adjacent Development The future traffic volumes used in this study assume the following: • VVMC build out • Evergreen Site redevelopment, per previous traffic study for this site • No changes to the TOV municipal site 1.5 Existing and Proposed Project Uses Table 1 shows the existing and proposed Project uses for each condition. Table 2 shows the number of employee and guest/patron parking spaces for each condition. � TurnKe Page 4 consulting, i_ WMC Master Plan TIS Table 1- Existing and Proposed Project Uses Condition Year Gross Bldg Full-time Employees Patient Exam Rooms Condition Year Area SF FTE Beds # Parking Spaces Existing 2014 202,000 569 58 155 West End 2015 202,000 569 58 160 (During Const 9 107 116 245 46 West End 2016 242,000 590 58 190 Const Completed 57 66 195 96 291 East End 2017 242,000 590 58 190 (During Const East End 2018 268,000 610 58 197 Const Completed) 245 46 291 254 153 Build -out Prior to 300,000 1 700 58 2601 2035 East End 2017 32' 153' 185' 02 Overall Increase 49% 23% 0% 68% (Existing to Build -out Notes: SF — square footage 1. The SF and exam rooms shown for the Build -out Condition are speculative in nature. Estimates are provided for long-range traffic planning purposes only Table 2 - Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Note: the number of parking spaces were estimated based on schematic designs for the Master Plan effort; the final parking numbers are subject to change as more detailed design work is completed. # Parking Spaces Accessed via Total Condition Year West Meadow Drive Frontage Road # Parking Spaces Emp P / G Total Emp P / G Total Emp P / G Total Existing 2014 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 West End 2015 9 57 66 195 96 291 204 153 357 (During Const West End 2016 9 107 116 245 46 291 254 153 407 Const Com leted East End 2017 32' 153' 185' 02 0 0 32 153 185 (During Const t End 2018 53 0 5 404 210 614 409 210 619 CoEa ted (nstBuild-out Prior to 53 0 5 435 260 695 440 260 700 2035 Overall Increase 73% 70% 72% (Existing to Build -out Notes: Emp — Employee, P / G — Patron / Guest 1. Includes 69 parking spaces (46 = P / G, 23 = Emp) at the US Bank Building that will be accessed from West Meadow Drive instead of the Frontage Road. 2. During the East End Construction the WMC will "replace" 245 parking spaces by leasing parking spaces at nearby parking structures, and/or increasing transit and shuttle use by employees. 3. These 5 parking spaces are for service vehicles CTurmnKe Page 5 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Existing VVMC Main Access (to be relocated to Int #2) ImPsm T VVMC' Air- . W Meadow Dr Vail Road and Meadow Dr Pint #31 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Vicinity Map Vail Rd a m Figure 1 TurnKe Page 6 Consulting, LLC Proposed Roundabout Existing 1-70 South South -' [Int #1] VVMC Frontage Rd Roundabout �4 General location based (on FHU study area) Access at Main Vail --_ (Int #2] Interchange - s 1-70 • Evergreen .� Lodge' Existing VVMC Main Access (to be relocated to Int #2) ImPsm T VVMC' Air- . W Meadow Dr Vail Road and Meadow Dr Pint #31 Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Vicinity Map Vail Rd a m Figure 1 TurnKe Page 6 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 Not To Scale Exact location and �}+► geometry of the �s Proposed Roundabout ~ not know at this point; yellow shape represents the area studied by FHU : TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1-70S Fro ntage Rd VVMC v 3 W4 fea = dow T � e E Meadow Drive F 3 Ped / Transit only Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Figure Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Control 2 �TurnPage 7 Consulti�nga,UC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1.6 Summary of Traffic Analysis Results The following sections summarize the traffic analysis results at the three Study Area intersections. 1.6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions of all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 3 shows the level of service (LOS), delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. TurnKe Page 8 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 3 - Proposed Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue Approach LOS — Delay (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) West Leg A-5 20 A — 9 70 (Frontage Road Southbound East Leg A-6 50 A-6 50 (Frontage Road and Right -Turn South Leg A-6 20 A-9 20 (Evergreen Lodge Access 105 (VVMC Access, North Leg A — 6 20 A-6 20 TOV Service Access (Evergreen Lodge Overall Roundabout A-6 50 (max) A-7 70 (max) all vehicles Table 3 shows that the Proposed Roundabout will operate at LOS A with minimal queuing in year 2018, the anticipated opening year of the WMC Master Plan. Refer to the FHU memo in the Appendix for the year 2035 Build -out analysis results. 1.6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the VVMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. Table 4 shows that the "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access and TOV Access thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. Table 4 - VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO: TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN prohibited) �TurnPage 9 Consulti�nga,LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 TOV Access and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 (VVMC Access, Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access �TurnPage 9 Consulti�nga,LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 5 shows that the RIRO configuration at the VVMC and TOV Accesses on the Frontage Road will operate at LOS A in the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. Table 5 — WMC/TOV Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proaosed Roundabout) 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (ft) (sec) sec ft sec ft B — 10 95 West Meadow Drive Northbound Right -turn A — 3 45 A-8 95 Accessouthbound Northbound SVVMC Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 TOV Access Southbound A — 10 —7 115 1.6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 6 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. Table 6 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] TurnKe Page 10 Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A — 7 50 B — 10 95 West Meadow Drive Westbound A — 10 55 A — 9 65 East Meadow Drive Northbound A — 8 55 B — 12 90 Vail Road Southbound A — 10 —7 115 B — 11 T 100 Vail Road) Overall Intersection A — 9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles TurnKe Page 10 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 6 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM = 518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building during the East End Constructions is only 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM). VVMC Trips on West Meadow Drive after the VVMC Master Plan is Completed After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000-1,400 vehicles per day (1,000 = summer season, 1,400 = winter season) to 58 vehicles per day (service and delivery vehicles only). The 58 vehicles per day on West Meadow Drive is 29 services and delivery vehicles that make 29 trips IN and 29 trips OUT for a total of 58 daily trips. The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. 1.7 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 1.7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the CTurnKe Page 11 onsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 1.7.2 VVMC Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the WMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 1.7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. TurnKe Page 12 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 2 Existing Traffic Count Data 2.1 VVMC Accesses Traffic counts were conducted at the VVMC Accesses on the dates and times listed in Table 7. Table 7 also shows a comparison of the summer and winter traffic counts. Table 7 — Summary of Traffic Counts at VVMC Accesses Notes: vph — vehicles per hour 1. The peak hour data shown is for highest peak hours of the two days that were counted Table 7 shows that the winter season peak hour traffic volumes were higher than the summer season. Therefore, the traffic data collected on February 4, 2014 was used for this TIS. 2.2 Other Traffic Count Locations In addition to counting the traffic IN and OUT at the VVMC Accesses, the movements and intersection listed below were also counted. Figure 3 shows the existing year 2014 peak hour traffic volumes at these locations. The Appendix contains the peak hour traffic count data at all locations. • Frontage Road thru movements at the VVMC Access • Traffic IN and OUT at the TOV Access • Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection TurnKe Page 13 Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Season Traffic Volumes Traffic Volumes Date Time vpn Time vph IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Summer' Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:30-7:30 am 1 160 29 189 4:00-5:00 pm 62 94 156 Thursday, August 22, 2013 Winter 6:45-7:45 am 167 36 203 3:30-4:30 pm 108 109 217 Tuesday, February 4, 2014 % Difference 7% 289/lo (Summer is % lower than Winter) Notes: vph — vehicles per hour 1. The peak hour data shown is for highest peak hours of the two days that were counted Table 7 shows that the winter season peak hour traffic volumes were higher than the summer season. Therefore, the traffic data collected on February 4, 2014 was used for this TIS. 2.2 Other Traffic Count Locations In addition to counting the traffic IN and OUT at the VVMC Accesses, the movements and intersection listed below were also counted. Figure 3 shows the existing year 2014 peak hour traffic volumes at these locations. The Appendix contains the peak hour traffic count data at all locations. • Frontage Road thru movements at the VVMC Access • Traffic IN and OUT at the TOV Access • Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection TurnKe Page 13 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS ii Not To Scale Legend X_ = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume Evergreen Lodge Access �—\ 1TOV West Access WMC ' 20 76 4 44 t71 11 18 16 ~ 15 This intersection was counted to determine the overall trips to/from VVMC, but was not included in the intersection analysis. TOV Main Access 2 1I-70 South Frontage Rd Mead --77s OH, 143 65 1103 0 28 88� + L 4 0 7 10 10 0 18 9 2 01ira 4 60 2 151 2 3 5\ 5j 13 39 2 1 L 193 .- 359 1117; 84 9 31826 2 29/ Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Count Volumes Main Vail �o 0 265 274 E Meadow Drive 3 pad /Transit only Figure 3 T#.lrmnKe Page 14 0 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 2.3 Peak Hour Determination: VVMC Traffic vs Frontage Road Traffic The AM and PM peak hours for the VVMC traffic and the Frontage Road thru traffic were calculated separately to see if had the same peak hour. Table 8 shows a comparison of the peak hours. The Appendix contains more detailed peak hour calculations. Table 8 — Peak Hour Comparison Time Peak Period Traffic Volumes vehicles per hour (vph) VVMC Traffic 1-70 South Frontage Road (All Accesses) (At VVMC Access) IN OUT Total WB Thru EB Thru Total AM Peak Period 6:30-7:30 am 149 28 177 117 72 189 6:45-7:45 am 167 36 203 136 79 215 7:00-8:00 am 154 36 190 180 110 290 7:15-8:15 am 150 42 192 235 151 386 7:30-8:30 am140 42 182265 193 45�C7 PM Peak Period 3:00-4:00 pm 98 84 182 249 315 564 3:15-4:15 pm 102 1 A jj]rPPjM278 97 199 270 340 350 610 628 3:454:45 pm 1 94 11 11 • 86 115 121 209 207 278 351 629 4:15-5:15 pm 79 123 202 279 341 620 4:30-5:30 pm 65 127 192 267 320 587 4:45-5:45 pm 63 143 206 246 294 540 5:00-6:00 pm 66 143 177209 223 272 495 Table 8 shows that the peak hours for the VVMC traffic and Frontage Road traffic are different. Below are observations about each peak period. AM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours only overlap by 15 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 10% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (203 vph vs 182 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 53% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph). Because the Frontage Road traffic is so much lower during the VVMC peak hour (458 vph vs 215 vph), the traffic volumes during the Frontage Road peak hour were used for the AM peak hour. TurnKe Page 15 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS PM Peak Hour The VVMC and Frontage Road peak hours overlap by 30 minutes. VVMC traffic during the Frontage Road peak hour is 5% lower than during the VVMC peak hour (217 vph vs 207 vph). Frontage Road traffic during the VVMC peak hour is 0.8% lower than during the Frontage Road peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph). Because the Frontage Road peak hour is essentially the same during the VVMC peak hour (633 vph vs 628 vph), the traffic volumes during the VVMC peak hour were used for the PM peak hour. 2.4 VVMC Weekday Peak Hour vs Weekend Peak Hour The traffic volumes discussed in Sections 2.1-2.3 were collected during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The weekday represents the peak for the VVMC because the VVMC operates at full capacity with all clinics open on weekdays. On the weekend, the VVMC has significantly less trips because the clinics are closed and VVMC operates with reduced and staff and doctors. 3 Project Trips 3.1 Project Trip Generation The Project trip generation is based on the existing winter season traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses and the existing and future VVMC land use and parking spaces. Table 9 summarizes the existing traffic counts at the VVMC Accesses by group — employees and guests / patrons. Table 9 - Year 2014 Winter Traffic Count at WMC Accesses by Group Peak Hour Main Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access Frontage Road US Bank Bldg Access Fronta e Road Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT Guest / Patron Trips AM 44 20 --- --- --- --- 5 0 49 20 PM 71 76 --- --- --- --- 5 2 76 78 Employee Trips AM --- --- 1 1 61 19 29 2 91 22 PM --- --- 2 2 5 18 25 11 32 31 The steps listed below were used to calculate the VVMC trip generation for each condition. The trip generation for Guests / Patrons and Employees were calculated separately, and then combined at the last step. The Appendix contains the detailed trip generation calculations. Guest / Patron Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in Patient Beds, Exam Rooms, and Guest / Patron Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. O TurnKey Page 16 Gansulting. i_t VVMC Master Plan TIS The Patient Beds did not change for any condition so it was disregarded. Due to the limited Parking Spaces at the VVMC, the trip generation is more dependent upon the availability of Parking Spaces than the increase in Exam Rooms. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Guest / Patron Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road. Employee Trip Generation Calculations Step #1 Calculated the percent change in FTE's and Employee Parking Spaces from one condition to the next. Due to the limited Employee Parking Spaces at the VVMC (some employees have to park off-site now), the Employee trip generation is dependent upon the availability of Employee Parking Spaces, and not the increase in FTE's. Therefore, the percent change in trip generation for each condition was directly correlated to the percent change in Employee Parking Spaces. Step #2 Increased/decreased the trips to/from the VVMC by the percent change in Parking Spaces from Step #1. Step #3 Allocated the trips to/from the VVMC for each condition based on the percent of parking spaces accessed via West Meadows Drive or Frontage Road Combine Guest / Patron and Employee Trips Step #4 The number of Patron / Guest and Employee trips were combined to get the total trips to/from the VVMC on West Meadow Drive, and Frontage Road for each condition. Table 10 shows a summary of the VVMC trip generation. The "Trip Generation Calculations" table in the Appendix shows the detailed trip generation calculations. TurnKe Page 17 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 10 — VVMC Trip Generation Summary 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips VVMC Peak Hour Trips (vph) West Meadow DriveFrontage West Meadow Drive Road Condition Year AM Pk Hr PM Pk HrEAMPkHr From the East (WB LT) PM PkHr To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) IN Out Tot IN Out Totut 85% 15% I Tot IN Out Tot Existing 2014 45 21 66 73 78 151 95 21 116 35 31 66 West End 2015 21 8 29 29 30 59 101 30 131 73 73 146 (During Const) West End 2016 37 15 52 54 56 110 103 27 130 54 53 107 (Const Completed) East End 2017 60 23 83 80 82 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 (During Const) East End 2018 2 0 2 1 1 2 212 62 274 155 156 311 (Const Completed) Build -out Prior to 2 0 2 1 1 2 239 72 311 183 186 369 2035 3.2 Project Trip Distribution The Project Trip Distribution was based on the existing traffic counts at 1) the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road, and 2) Vail Road and Meadows Drive intersection. Table 11 shows the trip distribution percentages at these two locations. The Project Trip Distribution is the same in all conditions. Table 11 — VVMC Trip Distribution Summary Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. TurnKe Page 18 Consulting, LLC Trip Distribution for VVMC Trips Fronta a Road West Meadow Drive Peak Hour Inbound Trips Outbound Trips Inbound Trips Outbound Trips From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East I (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) AM 90% 10% 85% 15% 100% 0% 90% 10% PM 75% 25% 95% 5% 95% 5% 95% 5% Figures 4 (AM Peak) and 5 (PM Peak Hour) show the Project Trip Distribution. Figures 6 thru 10 show the Project Trip Assignment. TurnKe Page 18 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution — AM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 4 -"ff f]" i►� Page 19 _ consultrng, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Distribution — PM Peak Hour (Same for all Conditions) I 5 �+�ll"f1' i Page 20 0 `Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End — During Construction) I 6 C�+�ll"f1' i Page 21 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (WMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (West End — Construction Completed) I 7 C�+�ll"f1' i Page 22 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End - During Construction) 1 8 CTumKev -,J Page 23 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (East End — Construction Completed) I 9 C�+�ll"f1' i Page 24 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Project Trip Assignment (Build -out) I 10 C�+�ll"f1' i Page 25 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes The following sections describe the existing, future background, and total traffic volumes. The Appendix contains tables that show the traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes 4.1.1 Frontage Road Traffic Volumes 4.1.1.1 Existing Year 2014 The existing year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes are based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2014. The Frontage Road traffic volumes from the February 2014 traffic count were compared to the traffic volumes from 1) the 2009 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP), 2) the Vail MOB TIS prepared in November 2012 by Turn Key Consulting, and 3) the MOB and Municipal Center Roundabout Analysis memo prepared in October 2012 by FHU. Table 12 shows the traffic volume comparison. Table 12 - Compare Frontage Road Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Direction Year 2006 (Vail TMP) Year 2014 (Calculated) Note 1 Year 2014 (traffic count in Feb 2014 Year 2025 (Vail TMP) Year 2032 (TOV Info) AM EB 395 475 193 Not included in Vail TMP 605 WB 585 704 265 880 Total 980 1,178 458 1,485 EB 815 980 359 1,202 1,160 PM WB 600 722 274 992 985 Total 1,415 1,701 633 2,194 2,145 Notes: 1. The year 2014 Frontage Road traffic volumes were calculated using a straight-line growth between the years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP. The annual growth rate (AGR) between years 2006 and 2025 traffic volumes in the Vail TMP was 2.34% per year. Table 12 shows that the year 2014 traffic counts are 62% lower than the year 2014 traffic volumes calculated using the years 2006 and 2035 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. In addition, the 2014 traffic counts are 54% lower than the year 2006 traffic volumes from the Vail TMP. Because of the significant difference between traffic volume sources, the Frontage Road traffic volumes based on the Vail TMP were used so that this TIS is consistent with the Vail TMP. The traffic volumes in the Vail TMP are based on traffic data "collected over a variety of times including the Christmas holiday, Martin Luther King weekend, Presidents Day weekend, and Spring Break times in 2005 and 2006." (Page 4 of the Vail TMP). Figure 11 shows the adjusted year 2014 traffic volumes. CTurnKe Page 26 onsulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 It <423 1 3 5 Not To Scale 2 1 2 5 I I I 1339Legend 2 2Irl I`� 5 662 475 704 X = AM Peak Hour Volume 652 980 722 Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 47 11 84 75 9 26I 64 3 18 69 2 29 ;adow Drive I / Transit Only Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan I Figure Adjusted Year 2014 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1 11 C�+�ll"f1' i Page 27 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.1.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018 The 2.34% AGR (refer to Note 1 of Table 12) was applied to the year 2014 traffic volumes from the Vail MOB TIS to calculate the Frontage Road traffic volumes in years 2015-2018 and 2035. 4.1.1.3 Future Year 2035 FHU, who prepared the Vail TMP, stated in an email to the TOV that a 0.5% AGR could be used to forecast traffic growth from year 2025 to year 2034. The 0.5% AGR was applied to the year 2025 Frontage Road traffic volumes in the Vail TMP to estimate year 2035 Frontage Road traffic volumes. The Appendix contains the email from FHU to the TOV. The 0.5% AGR from 2025 to 2034 has been recommended by FHU and the TOV since the Vail TMP is based on the assumption that Vail will reach build -out by 2025. It has been recommended that after build -out only this modest growth rate be applied. It also should be noted that with the recent economic downturn and slowing of development in Vail, it is unlikely Vail will see build out in 2025 and potentially it will extend beyond 2034. Thus it is likely that the total traffic growth projected for this study is very conservative. 4.1.2 TOV Traffic Volumes (Main Access) 4.1.2.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes to/from the main access to TOV Municipal Building (TOV Main Access) on the Frontage Road were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. These traffic volumes were used without any modifications. 4.1.2.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the TOV were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. There have been several proposed projects on the north side of the Frontage Road (including a parking structure for the VVMC) that would significantly increase the traffic volume at the TOV Access. At this point the traffic volumes at the TOV Access do not include any future development on the TOV property. 4.1.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive Traffic Volumes 4.1.3.1 Existing Year 2014 The traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were counted during the February 2014 traffic counts. This intersection was not included in the Vail TMP so it was not possible to see how the February 2014 traffic counts compared to the Holiday traffic counts in the Vail TMP. Therefore, these traffic volumes were used without any modifications for year 2014. TurnKe Page 28 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 4.1.3.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018. 2035 The background traffic volumes (all movements except those to/from West Meadow Drive) at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection were increase by 0.5% AGR to years 2015 thru 2018 and 2035. The 0.5% AGR is based on the area served by this intersection is already developed, but traffic will still probably see modest growth over time as noted by FHU in the email to the TOV referenced in Section 4.1.1.3. 4.1.4 Evergreen Lodge Traffic Volumes 4.1.4.1 Existina Year 2014 The Evergreen Lodge is located on the south side of the Frontage Road immediately west of the VVMC. If the Proposed Roundabout is constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC / TOV Access, the south leg of the Proposed Roundabout could be the Evergreen Lodge access. Because of this, the traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Fox Higgins prepared a traffic study in year 2008 for the proposed redevelopment of the Evergreen Lodge. The Fox Higgins traffic study was based on the Evergreen Lodge expanding from 128 units (128 hotel rooms) to 230 units (139 hotel rooms and 91 condos). Even though the redevelopment has not occurred yet, the year 2014 traffic volumes at the Evergreen Lodge were based on the proposed redevelopment from the Fox Higgins traffic study. The trips to/from the Evergreen Lodge were distributed using the same trip distribution percentages calculated at the VVMC Frontage Road access. The Appendix contains select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study, and the Evergreen Lodge trip generation and distribution calculations. 4.1.4.2 Future Years 2015 to 2018, 2035 The year 2014 traffic volumes to/from the Evergreen Lodge were assumed to stay the same in all future year scenarios. 4.2 Total Traffic Volumes (Background + Project) Total traffic volumes are the sum of project traffic and background traffic. The Appendix contains tables that show the total traffic volumes at the Study Area intersections. Figures 12 thru 16 show the total traffic volumes. TurnKe Page 29 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 1 2 See Note Below <433 3 51Not To Scale 2 2 5� I '�13;39Legend + 2 1`x` 5 680 486 720Y = PM Peak Hour VolumeX = AM Peak Hour Volume 47 671 1003 18 91` 7391 75 118 5 26; 551 64 69 4 69 3 144 41 104 X 16 47j�L4 0 78� L 4 2---� � o 0 02 1 60 2 152 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Year 2015 Total Traffic Volumes (West End - During Construction) ;adow Drive / Trenslt only Figure G PA CTurmn �e Page 30 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend 444 X = AM Peak Hour Volume 971 Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 3 144 57 104 0 23 704 0 102 t 4 3� 0 80 02 3 153 1 2 1 1 1� L 2 12� 47 25 I75 16 I rL 4 69 2 See Note Below <497 5 13 39696 5737687 756 93I 4; I 23 50 NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Year 2016 Total Traffic Volumes (West End — Construction Completed) ;adow Drive I /Transit Only Figure 13 CTurmnKe Page 31 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 2 1 2 446 1� 709 981 702 12� 47 25 1 I I r 75 16 64 4 69 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5� �"l3 39 509 2� 5 754 1050 774 ----\�1 r:: VVMC Access 0 I" ?O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1-7p South Frontage Rd VVMC '0 0 0 3 wM �adOW 145 80 105 0 �/�v� (� 1 30 8 95� � � 4 4 E Meadow Drive L 7 10 10 ~ 18 NOTE 3 Ped / Transit Only s� 0 This movement will have to make a U- turn at the Proposed Roundabout west 0 0 of the VVMC Access when the TOV a 61 2 153 Access is converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Figure 14 Year 2017 Total Traffic Volumes (East End — During Construction) �Lll"f1r� Page 32 �Gonsuiting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Not To Scale Legend X = AM Peak Hour Volume Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 479 1� 2 736 1045 728 X2512� 47 t I 75 16'1 I 64 4 69 2 See Note Below 3 5 2 5� I 13 39 5 521 2� 772 1075 792 211191, 39 39 � 1 � 53 X116; 9 I , 8 148 I" ?O TOV West Access Evergreen Main Vail Lodge TOV Main Interchange Access Access 2 1- 7p South Frontage Rd VVMC '0 0 0 3 �IiM �adOW 146 22 105 0 �/�v (� 204 0 9 L 51� 4 E Meadow Drive t 7 � 10 3 Ped / Transit Only 10 18 � NOTE 1� 0 Both of these movements will have 5 2 rn to make a U-tuat the Proposed 0 0 Roundabout west of the VVMC 61 2 Access when the VVMC and TOV 154 Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Figure 15 Year 2018 Total Traffic Volumes (East End - Construction Completed) C+�ll"flr� Page 33 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS It Not To Scale Legend 1 1 \ � 2 1 1 + ,� 2 606 920 644 X = AM Peak Hour Volume 1263 985 1263 Y = PM Peak Hour Volume 12 47 3 1'�\ 59 24 114 0 1 224 0 55� L 4 1 0 6 �1r0 2 67 2 168 25 0 1 64 75 \16 I 4 69 / NOTE Both of these movements will have to make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access when the VVMC and TOV Accesses are converted to RIRO. Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) Master Plan Year 2035 Total Traffic Volumes (Build -out) ;� See Note Below 4 7 , 3 10�I�22 54 11 25� 60 953 1043 24� 215; 46 1; 1 37 \11 I 61 9 177 ;adow Drive I / Trenslt Only Figure 16 CTurmn ie Page 34 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 5 Turn Lane Warrants at VVMC Access to Frontage Road The need for turn lanes on the Frontage Road at the VVMC Access is based on the requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code (SHAC). Table 13 shows the required turn lanes per the SHAC. Table 13 — Turn Lane Warrants at WMC Access to Frontage Rd Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using TurnKe Page 35 O consulting, LLc Total 2035 Volume (vph) CDOT Turn Lane Warrants Lane Turn Lane (Based on higher F -R Access Classification Warranted? traffic volume of AM Speed Limit = 25 mph or PM peak hour) Right -IN Right -OUT (RIRO) Access (Left -turn IN and Out Prohibited) WB Left -turn Deceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited inbound Traffic will make a U-turn at the Proposed Roundabout west of the VVMC Access EB Right -Turn Deceleration Lane Right -Turn IN More than 50 vph YES inbound DHV = 239 NB -WB Left -Turn Acceleration Lane Movement will be Prohibited outbound Traffic will make a U-turn at the Existing Roundabout at the Main Vail Interchange NB -EB Right -Turn Acceleration Lane Right -Turn OUT Not required on multi -lane No (outbound) DHV = 186 highways of this category Table 13 shows that an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane (EB RT Decel Lane) will be required at the VVMC Access to the Frontage Road. The EB RT Decel Lane was included in the roadway configuration for the traffic analysis discussed in the next section. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis The traffic operations was analyzed at the three Study Area intersections. The following sections describe the analysis and results for each Study Area intersection. 6.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC Access was analyzed using the FHWA Roundabout Methodology, which utilizes the methods and calculations in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010). In addition to the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, the SIDRA Roundabout Methodology was used to validate the results of HCM 2010 Roundabout analysis and provide a range of analysis results. SIDRA is a computer software program that can analyze Roundabouts using TurnKe Page 35 O consulting, LLc VVMC Master Plan TIS either 1) the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology, or 2) the SIDRA Methodology. The Roundabout analysis was conducted twice for each Methodology, once with the "Default" factors and parameters, and a second time with factors and parameters approved by CDOT and FHWA as part of the System Level Study for the Wolcott traffic study, including: • Critical Gap = 4.05 seconds • Follow Up Headway = 2.50 seconds Proposed Roundabout Location and Confi_guration The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. The following sections describe the Interim and Build -out conditions, and Roundabout analysis results. 6.1.1 Interim Condition [Year 2018 — Completion of the VVMC Reconstruction] The Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, which is anticipated to be year 2018. Table 14 shows the LOS, delay, and queuing results of the roundabout analysis based on the HCM 2010 Roundabout Methodology. Table 15 compares the results from the HCM 2010 and SIDRA Roundabout analyses methodologies. The Appendix contains the Roundabout analysis output. TurnKe Page 36 Consulting, LLC WMC Master Plan TIS Table 14 - Roundabout Analysis Results [Year 2018] Roundabout Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LO S — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) LOS — Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (ft) (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pP Factors & Parameters West Leg (Frontage Road A-5 20 A-9 70 East Leg (Frontage Road A-6 50 A-6 50 South Leg (Evergreen Lodge Access A-6 20 A-9 20 North Leg TOV Service Access A-6 20 A-6 20 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road Overall Roundabout all vehicles A-6 50 (max) A-7 70 (max) Table 15 - Roundabout Analysis: Compare Various Methodologies TurmnKe Page 37 0 consulting, LLC HCM 2010 SIDRA HCM 2010 SIDRA Roundabout (FHWA-Approved (FHWA-Approved (Default Factors (Default Factors Approach pP Factors & Parameters Factors & Parameters & Parameters) & Parameters) LOS — Dela sec Year 2018 AM Peak Hour Leg A-5 A-2 B— 11 A-2 (Frontage Road East Leg A-6 A-2 A-7 A-2 (Frontage Road South Leg A-6 A-6 B— 10 A-6 (Evergreen Lodge Access North Leg A-6 A-7 B— 10 A-7 TOV Service Access Overall Roundabout A-6 A-2 A-9 A-2 Lail vehicles Year 1 AM Peak Hour West Leg A-9 A-2 C-22 A-2 (Frontage Road East Leg A-6 A-2 A-6 A-2 Frontage Road South Leg A— 9 A-7 C— 18 A-7 (Evergreen Lodge Access North Leg A-6 A-7 A— 10 A-7 TOV Service Access Overall Roundabout A-7 A-2 B-15 A-2 all vehicles TurmnKe Page 37 0 consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.1.2 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] Refer to the FHU memo for the year 2035 Build -out analysis. 6.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010. The analysis included the TOV Site Access as the north leg of the intersection. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.2.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access. Table 16 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 16 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. TurnKe Page 38 J Consulting, LLc AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue sec ft sec ft Eastbound Left -turn A-6 20 A-5 20 (Fronta e Road Westbound Left -turn A — 3 50 A-9 40 Frontage Road Northbound Left -turn D — 31 40 E — 46 50 Right -turn A-3 A-5 (VVMC Access) Southbound Left -turn C— 18 20 C-23 35 Right -turn B— 12 A-8 (TOVAccess) 6.2.2 East End (Construction Completed) [Year 2018] VVMC has been working from the assumption that a roundabout would be constructed on the Frontage Road west of the VVMC access. That assumption is based on the premise that adjacent properties will redevelop and provide the right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. If the adjacent properties do not redevelop such that the proposed roundabout can not be constructed prior to the completion of the VVMC Master Plan, the VVMC needs an access option that would work in the interim condition prior to the construction of the proposed roundabout. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The following sections describe the possible scenarios that could occur in year 2018 at the completion of the VVMC Master Plan. TurnKe Page 38 J Consulting, LLc VVMC Master Plan TIS 6.2.2.1 Existing Roadway Configuration on the Frontage Road The VVMC Access on the Frontage Road was analyzed for the year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) scenario using the existing roadway configuration. Table 17 shows what can be expected at the VVMC Access if Frontage Road improvements (proposed roundabout or "First and Alone" alternative) are not constructed prior to the completion of the East End of the VVMC Campus. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 17 — VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2018] Existing Roadwav Configuration 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. TurnKe Page 39 Consulting, LLC AM Peak HourPeak Hour mm LOS —Delay 1 95 th % Queue LOS — Delay 95' % Queue I (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) b o� � 1 Due to the high volume of EB thru (Frontage -,a traffic (1,075 vph), there will be very Westbound1 few gaps for WB left -turns (116 vph) into the VVMC, in (Frontage Road) .1 • which will result the WB left -turns blocking the WB thru traffic on the Frontage Road. Northbound F — 57 (VVMC Access) • 1 The WB thru queue will probably Southbound extend back to the Roundabout at 1 the Main Vail interchange and cause `grid -lock" in that Roundabout. • • 6.2.2.2 "First and Alone" Alternative As stated in the introduction to Section 6.2.2, VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". These improvements are listed below. The Appendix contains a sketch of the "First and Alone" alternative. The "First and Alone" alternative was analyzed using year 2035 traffic volumes to see how it would operate beyond the completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018. Table 18 shows the results of the "First and Alone" alternative analysis. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. "First and Alone" Alternative Improvements on the Frontage Road • Construct a raised median on the Frontage Road that: o Converts the VVMC Access to RIRO, with a break in the raised median so that emergency vehicles can make a left -turn into VVMC. o Converts the TOV Access to 3/4 with a left -turn acceleration lane for outbound left -turns; the left -turn IN will be prohibited. • Construct an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane at the VVMC Access (per requirements in the Colorado State Highway Access Code — see Table 13) • Construct a bulb -out at the Evergreen Lodge Main Access that would accommodate westbound to eastbound U-turns. TurnKe Page 39 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Table 18 - VVMC Access: "First and Alone" Alternative [Year 2035] VVMC Access is RIRO. TOV Access is % (Left -turn IN prohibited) 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proposed Roundabout) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Southbound Shared Left- C — 16 30 C — 19 50 TOVAccess and Right -Turn Northbound Right -turn A-4 55 A — 10 105 VVMC Access Westbound (Evergreen Lodge U-turn A-5 95 B — 13 120 Access 6.2.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] The year 2035 Build -out Condition includes proposed roundabout on the Frontage Road. Table 19 shows the analysis results for the Year 2035 Build -out Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 19 - VVMC Access on Frontage Road Analysis Results [Year 2035] VVMC and TO Accesses are RIRO (in coniunction with the Proposed Roundabout) 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CTurnKe Page 40 onsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction Movement LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Northbound Right -turn A — 3 45 A-8 95 (VVMC Access) Southbound Right -turn A-4 35 A-5 50 TOV Access) 6.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The existing main access to the VVMC is on West Meadow Drive. In order to get to the VVMC main access, drivers pass thru the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection, which is a small four-way stop intersection with a high number of pedestrians and local buses. The VVMC Master Plan proposes to relocate the main access to the Frontage Road, but the new main access on the Frontage Road will not be open until year 2018. In addition, when the East End is being constructed in year 2017, it will be necessary to access the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building via West Meadow Drive. This means that the VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive will increase over the existing condition when the East End is under construction. The 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building represents a 60% increase in VVMC parking spaces accessed via West Meadow Drive (116 existing vs 185 during East End CTurnKe Page 40 onsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Construction). However, the traffic data obtained in February 2014 showed that the peak hour trips to/from the US Bank Building were 36 vph (AM) and 43 (PM). Based on the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection (AM = 316 vph, PM =518 vph), the increase in VVMC trips on West Meadow Drive to/from the US Bank Building is only 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM). The Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection was analyzed using Synchro and SimTraffic software, which is based on the HCM 2010, to compare the existing Condition to the East End (During Construction) to show the impact of using West Meadow Drive to access the US Bank Building parking. After the East End parking structure is completed, the VVMC main access will be on the Frontage Road. Except for service vehicles, all VVMC trips will use the new VVMC main access on the Frontage Road. The following sections describe the Existing, Interim, and Build -out conditions analysis results. 6.3.1 Existing Condition [Year 2014] This analysis is based on the existing roadway configuration at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection. Table 20 shows the analysis results for the Year 2014 Existing Condition. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 20 — Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2014] 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow TurnKe Page 41 Consulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS — Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A-7 55 B — 11 100 West Meadow Drive Westbound A-9 50 B — 10 70 East Meadow Drive Northbound A — 8 55 B — 12 100 Vail Road Southbound A — 9 95 B — 10 95 (Vail Road) Overall Intersection A — 9 95 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles 6.3.2 East End (During Construction) [Year 2017] The existing roadway configuration was analyzed for the year 2017 East End (During Construction) scenario. Table 21 shows what can be expected at the this intersection when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building are access via West Meadow TurnKe Page 41 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Drive during the construction of the East End parking structure. The Appendix contains the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis output. Table 21— Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Results [Year 2017] Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized CTurnKe Page 42 onsulting, LLC AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach LOS — Delay 95th % Queue LOS —Delay 95th % Queue (sec) (ft) (sec) (ft) Eastbound A — 7 50 B — 10 95 West Meadow Drive Westbound A — 10 55 A — 9 65 East Meadow Drive Northbound A — 8 55 B — 12 90 Vail Road Southbound A — 10 115 B — 11 100 Vail Road Overall Intersection A-9 115 (max) B — 11 100 (max) all vehicles Table 21 shows that there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection during the construction of the East End parking structure when the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building will be accessed via West Meadow Drive. 6.3.3 Build -out Condition [Year 2035] After the VVMC Master Plan is completed in year 2018, the VVMC traffic volume on West Meadow Drive will go from about 1,000 vehicles per day (based on August 2013 traffic count) to less than 20 trips per day (service vehicles only). The existing peak hour VVMC traffic at the Vail Road and Meadow Drive intersection represents 21% (AM) and 29% (PM). After completion of the VVMC Master Plan in year 2018, the peak hour traffic volume at this intersection will decrease by those same percentages. Therefore, the year 2035 Build -out Condition was not analyzed at this intersection. 7 Conclusion and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the Project trip generation and traffic analysis. 7.1 Proposed Roundabout on Frontage Road [Intersection #1] The TOV has taken the lead on the preliminary design of the Proposed Roundabout on the Frontage Road. The participants in this process include all adjacent property owners because the roundabout would require additional right of way from these properties. VVMC, TOV, and the Evergreen Lodge have been meeting for a couple months to evaluate various roundabout location and configuration options. The TOV has retained Felsburg Holt and Ullevig (FHU) to provide technical support to the effort, and they produced a memorandum to the TOV on 8/1/14. The FHU memo summarized CTurnKe Page 42 onsulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS the results of the alternatives analysis for the roundabout, which was based on build out conditions on all three properties in the year 2035. The most recent team meeting was held on 8/5/14 where the participants agreed that the roundabout would be likely be located near the shared property line between the VVMC and Evergreen properties. FHU is currently looking at several different access configurations for the roundabout at this location. This VVMC TIS could not analyze the proposed roundabout because the preferred configuration is not known yet. Therefore, this TIS refers to and relies upon the FHU memo for the roundabout operational analysis in the build out condition. The FHU memo indicates that the proposed roundabout would operate at LOS B or better, even when using conservative background traffic and site trip generation estimates. It is anticipated that the preferred roundabout location and configuration will be identified sometime during the VVMC Master Plan approval process, so this TIS will be updated accordingly. VVMC has identified the Frontage Road improvements that would be necessary if VVMC were to redevelop "First and Alone". The "First and Alone" evaluation was done to find a workable VVMC access solution that could occur within the existing right of way. The ultimate roundabout configuration would require additional highway right of way for implementation. In addition, CDOT understands that over -designed roundabouts can create operational issues, which is another reason that VVMC evaluated the "First and Alone" access options that do not include a roundabout. 7.2 VVMC Access / TOV Access on Frontage Road [Intersection #2] The year 2018 East End (Construction Completed) analysis showed that the existing roadway configuration at the VVMC Access will probably create grid -lock on the Frontage Road and Main Vail interchange. If the proposed roundabout is not constructed prior to year 2018, the "First and Alone" alternative should be constructed prior to (or coincide with) the completion of the WMC Master Plan construction in year 2018. The "First and Alone" alternative will provide acceptable traffic operations at the VVMC Access (RIRO) and TOV Access (3/4 movement) thru the year 2035. In addition, an eastbound right -turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the VVMC Access on the Frontage Road. 7.3 Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] The VVMC trips at this intersection will increase during the East End construction due to the 69 parking spaces at the US Bank Building being accesses via West Meadow Drive. However, the increase in traffic at this intersection will only be 11 % (AM) and 8% (PM), and there will not be a noticeable change in the LOS, delay, or queuing at this intersection. No changes are recommended at this intersection. TurnKe Page 43 Consulting, LLC VVMC Master Plan TIS Appendix • Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT • Traffic Count Data o Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 o Summer Season Traffic Counts — August 21-22, 2013 • Peak Hour Calculations • Project Trip Generation Calculations • Project Trip Distribution Calculations • FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts • Evergreen Lodge o Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 o Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations • Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections • Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Frontage Road and VVMC Access Analysis Output [Intersection #2] o "First and Alone" Alternative Sketch • Vail Road and Meadow Drive Analysis Output [Intersection #3] • FHU Memo regarding Proposed Roundabout, dated August 1, 2014 TurnKe Page 44 Consulting, LLC Traffic Volume Development — VVMC Master Plan TIS Methodology submitted to TOV and CDOT Tu rn they Consulting, LLC superior Yrojecl Leadership Mark Bunnell From: Tom Kassmel <TKassmel@vailgov.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 2:38 PM To: 'Harbert - CDOT, Kent'; Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: RE: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, See my response below in bold. • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road. I agree the roundabout does not necessarily be analyzed, however we will have to understand the impacts of a new intersection on the multiple adjacent intersections as Kent suggests. • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation. I would guess that Summer mid week traffic patterns are significantly lower from winter. would suggest that a winter count be done as well, during a busier time period. The Town of Vail did winter counts along the Frontage Road this past winter that can be used as a comparison. • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Ok From: Harbert - CDOT, Kent[mailto:kent.harbert@state.co.us] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:21 PM To: Mark Bunnell Cc: Daniel Roussin; Tom Kassmel; Daniel Feeney; Skip Hudson Subject: Re: Vail Valley Medical Center - Study Area & Traffic Data Methodology Mark, I am not familiar with the previous study, but based on what you say about it I am okay with not analyzing the roundabout at the interchange. However, I do see that there a half dozen or so access onto the frontage road in proximity to this project that will need to be addressed at some point in the process. Thanks, Xent T. Kent Harbert, PE Access Engineer CDOT Region 3, Traffic and Safety Residency 222 South 6t" Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501-3794 Phone: 970-683-6279 Cell: 970-812-6768 Fax: 970-683-6290 kent.harbertgstate.coms On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Mark Bunnell <markbkturnke, ll�> wrote: Dan, Kent, and Tom, I am in the very early stages of a traffic study related to a potential master plan for the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) and want to get confirmation on the study area and traffic data. Typically, I would submit a full methodology (study area, traffic data, land use, trip generation & distribution, analysis periods & methods, etc), but at this point we just want to get the traffic counted before the summer season ends. I will submit a full methodology at a later date, assuming the master plan effort moves forward. Please review the details below and provide comments. Project The VVMC is looking at doing a master plan for their Vail campus, but the work is very preliminary and the possible concepts described in this email have not been finalized. The possible redevelopment of the VVMC could change the layout such that the VVMC Main Access would be on the 1-70 South Frontage Road, instead of on West Meadow Dr as it is today. There would possibly be a service access on West Meadow Drive that would not be used by patrons or employees so the future VVMC traffic on West Meadow Drive would be lower than existing. Study Area The study area will only include one intersection — the potential VVMC Main Access to the 1-70 South Frontage Road (see aerial image below). The TOV municipal building would be the north leg of the potential VVMC Main Access. We considered including the south roundabout at the Vail interchange in the study area, but did not include it for the following reasons: • The TOV completed an extensive evaluation of alternatives at the Main Vail Interchange Roundabouts as part of the 2025 Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Vail TMP). The Vail TMP concluded that there is a limited amount of realistic capacity improvements that could be constructed at the interchange, and concluded that other system -wide improvements would be needed to provide an acceptable level of service (LOS) at the interchange. • The Vail TMP discusses how reconfiguring the VVMC so that its main access is on the 1-70 South Frontage Road would improve the south roundabout. On page 37 of the Vail TMP it states: Another consideration listed in Table 6. but not specifically quantified, is the modification of the Ho&pital's access. The Vail Valley Medical Center is cuinien#y served by Meadow Drive via Mail Road. As such, nearly all of its traffic impacts the south roundabout intersection along the Vail Road (south) leg, The Center is in the planning process to re*o!nfigure its far lky such thal it night have art access directly onto the Frontage Road arrest of the Wit, across from the Municipal Center. This would `shift" some of this facility's traffic (0 of the south round*>out and off of the south roadway -leg" which is projected to operate at a poor LOS_ This scheme requires coordination with the other nearby uses' acoess points, but it could offer a small dose of traffic relief to the heavily -used south roundabout TurnKey Consulting prepared a traffic study for the Vail Medical Office Building (Vail MOB) in 2012. The traffic study was completed, but not submitted because the Vail MOB project did not continue. The Vail MOB consisted of constructing a medical office building and parking garage on the north side of the 1-70 South Frontage Road adjacent to the TOV municipal building. The Vail MOB / TOV municipal building access (north leg) would have lined up with the potential access to the VVMC main access (south leg). As part of the Vail MOB traffic study, CDOT and the TOV reviewed and approved a methodology that stated that the study area would only include the access to the Vail MOB, and not include the south roundabout at the Vail Interchange for the first reason listed above. Traffic Volume Data TurnKey Consulting plans to calculate the trip generation for the VVMC master plan based on the existing trips to/from the VVMC campus. In order to do that, we plan to conduct traffic counts at the three existing accesses to the VVMC campus for the durations listed below. The trip generation based on the summer season will be factored to the peak season (winter). • AM & PM peak periods (two hours each) • Two Weekdays (Tues & Wed OR Wed & Thur) The existing and future background traffic volumes on the 1-70 South Frontage Road will come from previous studies [Vail MOB traffic study prepared by TurnKey Consulting, Vail TMP, and follow-up work by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) on a potential roundabout at the VVMC / MOB access (see attached memo)]. The previous studies are based on the peak season (winter) so we do not plan on counting the traffic on the 1-70 South Frontage Road. Summary At this point I am looking for confirmation on the following: • Study area will only include the potential VVMC Main Access (south leg) and TOV municipal building access (north leg) to the 1-70 South Frontage Road • Collecting traffic counts for two weekday AM & PM peak hour periods will be sufficient to calculate the existing trip generation • Existing and future background traffic volumes for the 1-70 South Frontage Road will be based on the Vail MOB traffic study, the Vail TMP, and follow-up work by FHU. Please call or email if you have questions. Thanks, Mark Bunnell, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC M: 970-640-2677 O: 970-985-4001 markb(d-)turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 Networks Unlimited FilterIT identified this as CLEAN. Give feedback: This is SPAM • More VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Count Data • Winter Season Traffic Counts — February 4, 2014 • Summer Season Traffic Counts — August 21-22, 2013 TurnKey Consulting, LLC superior Prnjeol leadership Count Type Cars Trucks Cars & Trucks Peds WMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Main Entrance & W Meadows Drive I I WMC Employee Entrance and Frontage Rd Main Entrance & W Meadows Drive WMC Employee Entrance and Frontage Rd Count WMC Main Ect.— W Meadows Dr W Meadows Dr Municipal Bldg Frontage Road WMC Employee Ent Frontage Road Traffic tolfrom Alley A4j to Bank Bltlg Type Time 300 PM 3:15 PM 3'30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Cars 4:30 PM 445 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour 3:00 PM 3'15 PM 3:30 PM 3 45 PM 4:00 PM 4 15 PM Trucks 4:30 PM 445 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Cars & 4:30 PM Trucks 4:45 PM 5:00 PM t 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Peds 430 PM 4:45 PM 500 PM 515 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour ®®®® ® ®® ®® ® ® ®® ®® ®® ® rr m MOM 1=123 -11110MI-M rrm ����������©� rrmlliNllmllMERE �©�©� ©E EmIIIIIIIIIIIIII ME Mm MOMI IM ME mm MIMI rr m E�� :rrm ®NIM Mm ®' - ����M�����M� EM©MIE©IM®SIE ���� IMIIIIE©� ®� �������®��� mm mm © ©E r r m �' ��' �©��®�©I♦ ®m MEME®EMERE� �m ENIMEMINSWIMMINIM ���i M© rr m rrm®��©�®������ ������������ ���� �® �� �m MWIMMEIMMIMIMMIMM mm �© Im mm E IIIIIIBI� M' IM' IM' E' MIM' M' IM' IM' E' M' Main Entrance & W Meadows Drive WMC Employee Entrance and Frontage Rd Count WMC Main Ect.— W Meadows Dr W Meadows Dr Municipal Bldg Frontage Road WMC Employee Ent Frontage Road Traffic tolfrom Alley A4j to Bank Bltlg Type Time 300 PM 3:15 PM 3'30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Cars 4:30 PM 445 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour 3:00 PM 3'15 PM 3:30 PM 3 45 PM 4:00 PM 4 15 PM Trucks 4:30 PM 445 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Cars & 4:30 PM Trucks 4:45 PM 5:00 PM t 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM Peds 430 PM 4:45 PM 500 PM 515 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Total Peak Hour Page 1 of 2 MOM 1=123 -11110MI-M mm EmIIIIIIIIIIIIII ME Mm mm rrm®��©�®������ ���� �® mm Im mm IIIIIIBI� rrm mm ME mum ©E ME EM Page 1 of 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 Page 2 of 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Counts Collected on Wednesday and Thursday, August 21-22, 2013 Date/Time 08/21/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/21/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/21/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/21/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/21/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/21/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/21/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/21/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/21/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/21/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/21/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/21/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/21/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/21/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/21/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/21/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 06:30 - 06:44 08/22/2013 06:45 - 06:59 08/22/2013 07:00 - 07:14 08/22/2013 07:15 - 07:29 08/22/2013 07:30 - 07:44 08/22/2013 07:45 - 07:59 08/22/2013 08:00 - 08:14 08/22/2013 08:15 - 08:29 Peak Hour 08/22/2013 15:00 - 15:14 08/22/2013 15:15 - 15:29 08/22/2013 15:30 - 15:44 08/22/2013 15:45 - 15:59 08/22/2013 16:00 - 16:14 08/22/2013 16:15 - 16:29 08/22/2013 16:30 - 16:44 08/22/2013 16:45 - 16:59 Peak Hour Guest Access (W Meadow Dr) Service Access (W Meadow Dr) Employee Access (Frontage Road) SB (OUT) I NB (IN) SB (OUT) I NB (IN) NB (OUT) FSB (IN) 0000©� 0®000 ©©000® ®000© ©©000® ©000©® 000©� 00000® 0©00®0 00000 00000 ©©000 ®000© 0©000© ®000®0 ®®0000 �000�0 0©00®0 00000 ©000©® ©©000 00000® 0©0000 0000® ©000®® 0�000� 00000 000000 0000®0 00000© 00000 Total VVMC Trips OUT I IN 3 20 1 60 13 38 9 24 7 22 8 32 2 29 6 19 30 144 23 12 15 19 18 16 19 6 26 15 20 22 29 17 19 8 94 62 4 34 5 61 7 31 13 34 7 12 9 37 17 33 10 22 29 160 13 21 16 13 23 12 24 14 16 8 11 18 21 18 29 21 77 65 AM Peak Hour (Max) 12 21 0 0 17 13929 160 PM Peak Hour Max 44 30 2 0 48 32 1 94 62 Page 1 of 1 WMC Master Plan TIS Peak Hour Calculations Turn Key Consulting, LLC superior Yrojecl Leadership VVMC Trips 15 -Min Periods 21 Time IN OUT Total 6:30-6:45 am 27 5 32 6:45-7:00 am 50 8 58 7:00-7:15 am 33 7 40 7:15-7:30 am 39 8 47 7:30-7:45 am 45 13 58 7:45-8:00 am 37 8 45 8:00-8:15 am 29 13 42 8:15-8:30 am 29 8 37 Total 2901 70 360 3:00-3:15 pm 21 17 38 3:15-3:30 pm 19 14 33 3:30-3:45 pm 32 24 56 3:45-4:00 pm 26 29 55 4:00-4:15 pm 25 30 55 4:15-4:30 pm 25 26 51 4:30-4:45 pm 18 30 48 4:45-5:00 pm 18 35 53 5:00-5:15 pm 18 32 50 5:15-5:30 pm 1 111 301 41 5:30-5:45 pm 161 46 62 5:45-6:00 pm 211 351 56 Total 2501 3481 598 VVMC Master Plan TIS Peak Hour Comparison - VVMC Traffic vs Frontage Road Traffic Peak Hour 52 Time Time I IN JOUTITotal 98 84 182 3:15-4:15 prn 102 97 6:30-7:30 am 149 28 177 6:45-7:45 am 167 36 203 7:00-8:00 am 154 36 190 7:15-8:15 am 150 42 192 7:30-8:30 am 140 42 182 192 4:45-5:45 pm 63 143 1-70 South Frontage Road Traffic (at VVMC Access) 15 -Min Periods 52 Time IN 3:00-4:00 pm 98 84 182 3:15-4:15 prn 102 97 199 3:30-4:30 pm 108 109 217 3:45-4:45 prn 94 115 209 4:00-5:00 pm 86 121 207 4:15-5:15 prn 79 123 202 4:30-5:30 pm 65 127 192 4:45-5:45 pm 63 143 206 5:00-6:00 pm 66 1431 209 265 647 64 108 1-70 South Frontage Road Traffic (at VVMC Access) 15 -Min Periods 52 Time IN OUT Total 6:30-6:45 am 23 13 36 6:45-7:00 am 33 16 49 7:00-7:15 am 24 24 48 7:15-7:30 am 37 19 56 7:30-7:45 am 42 20 62 7:45-8:00 am 77 47 124 8:00-8:15 am 79 65 144 8:15-8:30 am 671 61 128 Total 3821 265 647 3:00-3:15 pm 52 63 115 3:15-3:30 pm 66 82 148 3:30-3:45 pm 65 89 154 3:45-4:00 pm 66 81 147 4:00-4:15 pm 73 88 161 4:15-4:30 pm 74 92 166 4:30-4:45 pm 65 90 155 4:45-5:00 pm 62 89 151 5:00-5:15 pm 78 70 148 5:15-5:30 pm 621 71 133 5:30-5:45 pm 44 64 108 5:45-6:00 pm 39 67 106 Total 746 946 1692 Page 1 of 1 Peak Hour Time WB Thru EB Thru Total 564 3:15-4:15 pm 270 340 6:30-7:30 am 117 72 189 6:45-7:45 am 136 79 215 7:00-8:00 am 180 110 290 7:15-8:15 am 235 151 386 7:30-8:30 am 265 193 458 587 4:45-5:45 pm 2461 2941 3:00-4:00 pm 249 315 564 3:15-4:15 pm 270 340 610 3:30-4:30 pm 278 350 628 3:45-4:45 prn 278 351 629 4:00-5:00 pm 274 359 633 4:15-5:15 prn 279 341 620 4:30-5:30 pm 2671 320 587 4:45-5:45 pm 2461 2941 540 5:00-6:00 pm 2231 2721 495 VVMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Generation Calculations TurnKey Consulting, LLC superior Projeol leadership Condition Existing West End (Du _q Const West End Const Com leted East End Durin Const East End Const Com feted Build -out WMC Master Plan TIS Trip Generation Calculations Patron / Guest Medical Accomodations Parking Trips to/from WMC (vph) Parking Spaces Trips on W Meadow Dr (vph) Trips on Frontage Road (vph) Spaces Change Patient Beds Exam Rooms (based on AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr W Meadow or 1-70S FR AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Med Acc and/or # Change Parking Spaces) # Change # Change E(fs°l�g) IN OUT IN OUT # % of # % of IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total (from (from Spaces Total Spaces Total Existin Existin Condition wu-time Parking Employees Spaces FTE o'oo Chane Chane # (f m # (f nm Existin Existin 569 0.0% 204[1907%.. 3.7% 2540.% 590 3.7% 32 -87.4% 610 7.2% 409 61.0% _ 700 23.0 % 440 73.2 % Employees 153 --- Trips to/from WMC (vph) 49 20 76 78 107 69.9% 46 30.1 % 44 20 1 64 71 76 147 1 5 1 0 5 1 5 2 7 58 0.0% 160 3.2% 153 0.0% 0.0% 49 20 76 78 57 37.3% 96 62.7% 18 7 25 28 29 57 31 13 44 48 49 97 58 0.0% 190 22.6% 153 0.0% 0.0% 49 20 76 78 107 69.9% 46 30.1% 34 14 48 53 55 108 15 6 21 23 23 46 58 0.0% 190 22.6% 153 0.0% 0.0% 49 20 76 78 153 100.0% 0 0.0% 49 20 69 76 78 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0.0% 197 27.1% 210 37.3% 37.3% 67 27 104 107 0 0.0% 210 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 27 94 104 107 211 60 67.7 % HEI % Kin] 83 34 129 133 0 0.0% 260 100.0 % 0 0 0 0 O= 83 34 117 129 HE Step #1 Step #2 Step #3 Condition wu-time Parking Employees Spaces FTE o'oo Chane Chane # (f m # (f nm Existin Existin 569 0.0% 204[1907%.. 3.7% 2540.% 590 3.7% 32 -87.4% 610 7.2% 409 61.0% _ 700 23.0 % 440 73.2 % Employees Trips on Frontage Road (vph) Trips to/from WMC (vph) Parking Spaces Trips on W Meadow Dr (vph) Trips on Frontage Road (vph) WMC campus % Change (based on Parking Spaces) AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr W Meadow Dr I-70 S FR AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total 91 22 32 31 9 3.5% 245 96.5% 1 1 1 2 2 2= 90 21 111 30 29 59 West End Durin ConstWest End590 Const Com feted East End Durin Const East End Const Com feted -19.7% 0.0% -87.4% 61.0% 73.2 % 73 18 26 25 91 22 32 31 11 3 4 4 147 35 52 50 45 158 38 55 54751 9 4.4% 195 95.6% 9 3.5% 245 96.5% 32 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 1.2% 404 98.8% =-/.4 .1 % 435 98.9 % 3 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 2 11 3 14 4 4 8 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 1 717 70 17 87 25 24 49 88 21 109 31 30 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 35 180 51 49 100 156 38 194 54 53 107 Build -out Condition Year TOTAL WMC TRIPS Trips on W Meadow Dr (vph) Trips on Frontage Road (vph) WMC Cam us AM Pk HrPM Pk Hr AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr IN OUT Total IN OUT Total I IN I OUT I Total I IN I OUT I Total Existing 2014 45 21 1 66 1731 1 95 1 21 1 116 1 35 31 66 West End Durin Const 2015 21 8 29 29 30 59 101 30 131 73 73 146 West End Const Com fete 2016 37 15 52 54 56 110 103 27 130 54 53 107 East End(During Const 2017 60 23 1 83 1801 82 162 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 East End Const Completed 2018 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1212162 1 274 155 156 311 Build -out Prior to 2035 2 0 2 1 1 1 2 239 72 311 183186 369 Page 1 of 1 WMC Master Plan TIS Project Trip Distribution Calculations Turn Key Consulting, LLC superior Yrojecl Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Trip Distribution Calculations VVMC Employee / Bank Bldg Entrance and Frontage Rd Municipal Bldg Frontage Road VVMC Employee Ent Frontage Road Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Total Left Thru I Right Left I Thru Ri ht Left I Thru I Right Left I Thru I Ri ht 7:30-8:30 am 623 3:30-4:30 pml 719 Peak Hour # Trips AM Dist. % USE # Trips PM Dist. % USE Trip Distribution Percentages - Frontage Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at VVMC access on Frontage Road) Inbound Outbound From the East (WB LT) From the West (EB RT) To the East (NB RT) To the West (NB LT) 26 Vail Road and Meadows Drive Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Vail Rd W Meadows Dr Peak Hour From North From East From South From West Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right 7:30-8:30 am 0 143 65 0 10 0 0 60 0 28 7 F 9 29 2 74.3% 25.7% 93.5% 6.5% 75% 25% 95% 5% 3:30-4:30 pm 4 103 88 2 18 4 4 151 2 123 10 PM Dist. USE Trip Distribution Percentages -Vail Road (Based on Vehicles IN and OUT at Meadow Drive and Vail Road Intersection) Peak Hour # Trips AM Dist. USE #Trips Inbound Outbound From the North (SB RT) From the South (NB LT) To the North (EB LT) To the South (EB RT) 88 4 123 9 95.7% 4.3% 93.2% 6.8% 95% 5% 95% 5% Page 1 of 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Email to TOV Regarding Traffic Forecasts TurnKey Consulting, LLC superior Prnjeol leadership Page 1 of 2 Skip Hudson From: Tom Kassmel [TKassmel@vailgov.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:23 AM To: Skip Hudson; Michael O'Connor (michael@triumphdev.com) Cc: Greg Hall Subject: FW: VOlumes I asked FHU to weigh in on the growth rate after 2025. See below. From: Chris.Fasching[mailto: Chris. Fasching@FHUENG.COM] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:01 PM To: Tom Kassmel Subject: RE: VOlumes Tom, We used 0.5% per year growth in the stud hich is pretty darn flat. I think you could safely apply this rate out to 2034. Thanks. Chris Fasching, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 303-721-1440 Fax - 303-721-0832 From: Tom Kassmel rmailto:TKassmel@vailgov.coml Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:58 PM To: Chris.Fasching Subject: VOlumes Chris Would you be able to weigh in on the appropriate growth rate for post 2025. So Turnkey (Skip) can extrapolate to 2034. We all agree it should be relatively flat compared to the growth we project until 2025, your thoughts? Tom Kassmel Town Engineer Public Works Department rowN of vs 970.479.2235 vailgov.com twitter.com/vailgov V�- 8/14/2012 WMC Master Plan TIS Evergreen Lodge Select pages from the Fox Higgins traffic study prepared in year 2008 Trip Generation and Distribution Calculations Turn Key Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership _tel T R A N S P R T A T 1 N G R U P October 3, 2008 Mr. Adam Williams ARC Integrated Program Management, Inc. 179038 th Street, Unit 105 Boulder, CO 80301 RE: Fairmont Vail Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Williams: Fox Higgins has completed a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Fairmont Vail project located on the south side of the S. Frontage Road roughly 850 feet west of the main Vail roundabout. This analysis has been completed following "Level Three" traffic assessment requirements per Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 3. Per CDOT requirements, this analysis evaluates potential traffic impacts along the S. Frontage Road with respect to operational considerations and auxiliary lane needs for the short-term build -out and long-term (20 -year) scenarios. Since the project and adjacent roadways are anticipated to generate the highest traffic volumes during the peak winter season, this study analyzes the peak winter scenario for the highest of the AM, PM and Saturday peak hour volumes. This memorandum summarizes our analysis and findings. Project Description The Fairmont Vail project is proposing to redevelop the existing Evergreen Lodge hotel with similar uses to include hotel rooms, on-site restaurant and meeting facilities, fractional -ownership units, and residential condominium units. The project site is located along the S. Frontage Rd. just west of mile marker 176. A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. Nearby accesses and intersections include the main Vail roundabout (Vail Road and 1-70 interchange) located roughly 850 feet east of the east site access, the existing Lionshead parking structure access located roughly 650 feet west of the west site access, and driveways for adjacent uses to the east. Two access driveways along the S. Frontage Road currently serve the site. These accesses are not shared or used by any other properties. The project proposes to relocate the easternmost access roughly 45 feet to the west of the current location, with the east access to serve only service vehicles with redevelopment. The existing westernmost access will serve as the main site access. This access location may need to be adjusted slightly to accommodate grades, though is shown in roughly the existing access location based on the current site plan. The site plan depicting the existing and proposed access points is shown on Figure 2. P.O. B❑x 1 9768, BOULDER, COLORADO 80308-2768 PHONE: 303-652-3571 ■ FAx: 31:13-772-2329 OR 303-652-6574 FH#08042 Fairmont Vail 10-03-08 Traffic Impact Analysis WHIG13INS Table 2. Trip Generation Estimate - No Reductions Table 3. Trip Generation Estimate with Non -Auto Use Reduction Non -Auto Average Weekday Average Saturday Weekday Weekday Saturday ITE Use Daily Trips Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Reduction Code Land Use Size Unit (a) Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Existing Land Use (Evergreen Lodge) 310 Hotel 128 Occupied 0% 8.92 1142 571 571 10.50 1344 672 672 0.67 86 50 36 0.70 90 44 46 0.87 111 54 57 78 38 Rooms Rooms Totals: 1142 571 571 1344 672 672 86 50 36 90 44 46 111 54 57 Proposed Site Land Uses (Fairmont Vail): 310 Hotel 128 Occupied 0% 8.92 1142 571 571 10.50 1344 672 672 0.67 86 50 36 0.70 90 44 46 0.87 111 54 57 32 0.87 78 Rooms 40 Rooms 310 Hotel (Fractional Ownership) 11 Occupied 0% 8.92 98 49 49 10.50 116 58 58 0.67 7 4 3 0.70 8 4 4 0.87 10 5 5 2 0.87 7 Rooms 3 Rooms 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse 91 Dwelling 0% 5.86 533 267 266 5.67 516 258 258 0.44 40 7 33 0.52 47 31 16 0.47 43 29 14 11 0.47 30 Units 10 Units Totals: 1 1 17731 8871 8861 Totals: 1 19761 9881 9881 6191 133 61 72 6901 145 79 661 50 1 164 88 76 451 1 115 62 53 Net Added Trip Totals (Proposed less Existing): 631 316 315 632 316 316 47 11 36 55 35 20 53 34 19 Table 3. Trip Generation Estimate with Non -Auto Use Reduction (a) Accounts for pedestrian, transit, and other non -auto trips made to/from the site within the downtown Vail core area; 30% reduction assumed per the Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Draft, June 2008). 08042 trip genAs - Trip Generation Non -Auto Average Weekday Average Saturday Weekday Weekday Saturday ITE Use Daily Trips Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Reduction Code Land Use Size Unit (a) Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate To In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Existing Land Use (Evergreen Lodge) 310 Hotel 128 Occupied 30% 8.92 799 400 399 10.50 941 471 470 0.67 60 35 25 0.70 63 31 32 0.87 78 38 40 Rooms Totals: 799 400 3991 941 471 4701 60 35 251 9 38 40 Proposed Site Land Uses (Fairmont Vail): 310 Hotel 128 Occupied 30% 8.92 799 400 399 10.50 941 471 470 0.67 60 35 25 0.70 63 31 32 0.87 78 38 40 Rooms 310 Hotel (Fractional Ownership) 11 Occupied 30% 8.92 69 35 34 10.50 81 41 40 0.67 5 3 2 0.70 5 3 2 0.87 7 4 3 Rooms 230 Residential CondominiumlTownhouse 91 Dwelling 30% 5.86 373 187 186 5.67 361 181 180 0.44 28 5 23 0.52 33 22 11 0.47 30 20 10 Units Totals: 1 1 12411 6221 6191 1 1383 693 6901 93 43 50 101 56 451 1 115 62 53 Net Added Trip Totals (Proposed less Existing): 442 222 2201 442 222 2201 33 8 251 38 25 131 37 24 13 (a) Accounts for pedestrian, transit, and other non -auto trips made to/from the site within the downtown Vail core area; 30% reduction assumed per the Vail Transportation Master Plan Update (Draft, June 2008). 08042 trip genAs - Trip Generation Land Use Size Units 230 - Residential Condo/Townhouse 91 1 Dwelling Units 310 - Hotel 139 Occu ied Rooms Total Trips IN & OUT VVMC Master Plan TIS Evergreen Lodge Trip Generation and Distribution Weekday AM Peak Hour Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic (7-9 am) Rate /Equation # Trips % IN %OUT Trips # Rate I Eq Total IN OUT AM Peak Hour of Generator Rate / Equation # Trips % IN %OUT # Trips Rate I Eq Total IN OUT MAX # Trips Total IN I OUT 0.44 / Ln(T) - 0.80 Ln(X) + 0.26 40 48 171 1 831/, 48 8 40 0.44 / L$ = 0.82 Ln(X) + 0.15 40 47 19% 81% 47 9 38 49 9 40 0.67 / T=0.78 X + -29.80 93 79 58% 42% 79 46 33 0.64 / Ln T = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.011 891 90 55 % 45% 1 90 501 401 1 901 501 40 1261 541 7211 1 137 591 78 139 59 80 Land Use Size Units Trip Distribution Percentages from VVMC Access; Weekday PM Peak Hour Assume that the two Evergreen Accesses will be consolidated to Peak Hour of Adj Street Traffic (4-6 pm) # Trips Rate /Equation % IN %OUT Rate Eq 0.52 / Ln T = 0.82 Ln X + 0.32 47 56 67% 33% 0.70 / 97 -NA- 49 % 51 % 1 Total 56 97 1 1531 PM Peak # Trips Rate /Equation IN OUT V 19 0.52 / T = 0.34 X + 48 49 0.74 / Ln(T) - 0.94 Ln(X) + 851 68 Hour of Generator # Trips % IN %OUT Rate Eq 35.87 47 67164% 36% -0.03 103 100157%1 43% # Trips Total IN 67 43 100 57 167 100 MAX # Trips OUT Total IN OUT 24 67 43 24 43 106 57 49 67 173 100 73 230 -Residential Condo/Townhouse 1 91 Dwellin Units 310 -Hotel 139 Occu ied Rooms Inbound Total Trips IN & OUTI EUsed Trip Distribution Trip Distribution Percentages from VVMC Access; Assume that the two Evergreen Accesses will be consolidated to one Total Trips AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour (Weekday MAX) --- 1 59 1 80 1 -- 1001 73 Direction Dist % IN OUT I Dist % IN OUT Inbound EB RT 10% 6 --- 25% 25 WB LT 90% 53 75% 75 Outbound NB LT 15% 12 5% 4 NB RT 85% 68 95% 69 Page 1 of 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Traffic Volumes at Study Area Intersections TurnKey Consulting, LLC superior Prnjeol leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Background, Project, and Total Traffic Volumes Page 1 of 3 1 South Frontage•.• and Potential Roundabout Traffic Source Access AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Configuration West End Trips West End NEE M�MM�M�wmmmmm� Trips Evergreen (S) East End Trips East End NEE Evergreen (S) Trips Trips Page 1 of 3 VVMC Master Plan TIS Background, Project, and Total Traffic Volumes Page 2 of 3 1-70 South Frontage Road and VVMC / TOV Access AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Phase Year Traffic Source VVMC Trips Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthbH31,344 VVMC Trips Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Frontage Road) (Frontage Road) (VVMC Access) (TOV Ac (Frontage Road) (Frontage Road) (VVMC Access) (TOV Access) Total IN OUT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT ThrIN OUT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing2014 Traffic Count 2 193 11 84 265 39 3 0 18;50 2 359 9 26 274 5 2 0 29 13 0 5 724 Frontage Road 475 704 980 722 1,702 Existing TOV Access TOV 2 39 2 5 13 5 25 (Adjusted) 2014 VVMC Access 95 21 11 84 3 18 35 31 9 26 2 29 66 TOTAL 2 475 11 84 704 39 3 0 18 2 980 9 26 722 5 2 0 29 13 0 5 1,793 WMC Trips IN 10% 90% 25% 75% VVMC Trip Site Trips OUT 15% 85% 5% 95% Distribution TOV Tris IN 10% 90%1 25% 75% Site TripsOUT85% 15% 95% 5% Frontage Road 486 720 1,206 1,003 739 1,742 TOV Access TOV 2 39 5 3 49 2 5 13 5 25 West End 2015 VVMC Access 101 30 10 91 5 26 132 73 73 18 55 4 69 146 (During Const) TOV Access WMC --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 TOTAL 2 486 10 91 720 39 5 0 26 5 0 3 1,387 2 1,003 18 55 739 5 4 0 69 13 0 5 1,913 Frontage Road 497 737 1,234 1,026 756 1,782 TOV Access TOV 2 39 5 3 49 2 5 13 5 25 West End 2016 VVMC Access 103 27 4 23 130 54 53 14 41 3 50 108TOV (Const Completed) Access MC --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 TOTAL 2 497 737 39 4 0 23 5 0 3 1,413 2 1,026 14 41 756 5 3 0 50 13 0 5 Fronta a Road 509754 t093 1,263 1,050 774 East End TOV Access TOV 2 39 5 3 49 2 5 13 5(During 2017 WMC Access 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Const) TOV Access WMC --- --- --- --- 0 --- --- --- --- --- ---TOTAL 2 509 754 39 0 0 0 5 0 3 1,312 2 1,050 0 0 774 5 0 0 0 13 0 5 11 Frontage Road 521 772 1,293 1,075 792 1111 East End TOV Access TOV 2 39 5 3 49 2 5 13 5 ]2,792 2018 VVMC Access 212 62 21 191 9 53 274 155 156 39 116 8 148 (Const Completed) TOV Access VVMC --- --- --- --- 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- TOTAL 2 521 21 191 772 39 9 0 53 5 0 3 1,616 2 1,075 39 116 792 5 8 0 148 13 0 5 Frontage Road 644 953 1,597 1,263 1,043 TOV Access TOV 3 54 7 4 68 25 60 22 10 Build -out 2035 VVMC Access 239 72 24 215 11 61 311 183 186 46 137 9 177 (Prior to 2035) TOV Access MC --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- TOTAL 3 644 24 215 953 54 11 0 61 7 0 4 11,976 25 1,263 46 137 1,043 60 9 0 177 22 0 10 Page 2 of 3 VVMC Master Plan TIS Background, Project, and Total Traffic Volumes Phase Year Vail Road and Meadow Drive AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Traffic Source WMC Trips Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound VVMC Trips Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Meadow Dr) (Meadow Dr) (Vail Rd) (Vail Rd) Total (Meadow Dr) (Meadow Dr) (Vail Rd) (Vail Rd) IN OUT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT IN OUT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Total Existing 2014 All Traffic Background minus VVMC 28 9 7 7 3 1 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 60 60 0 0 0 0 143 143 65 20 316 250 123 49 10 10 9 5 2 2 18 18 4 4 4 0 151 151 2 2 4 4 103 88 518 103 19 367 WMC Tris 45 21 19 2 0 45 66 73 78 74 4 4 69 151 TOTAL 28 7 3 0 10 0 0 60 0 0 143 65 316 123 10 9 2 18 4 4 151 2 4 103 88 518 WMC Trip Distribution Trips IN Trips OUT o 90% 0 10% 10% 1007 o 95% 0 5 /o 5% 95% West End Background 9 7 1 0 10 0 0 60 0 0 144 20 251 49 10 52 18 4 0 152 2 4 104 19 369 2015 VVMC Tris 21 8 7 1 0 21 29 29 30 29 2 1 28 60 (During Const) TOTAL 16 7 2 0 10 0 0 60 0 0 144 41 280 78 10 7 2 18 4 1 152 2 4 104 47 429 West End Back round 9 7 1 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 144 20 252 49 10 5 2 18 4 0 153 2 4 104 19 370 (Const 2016 WMC Tris 37 15 14 2 0 37 53 54 56 53 3 3 51 110 Completed) TOTAL 23 7 3 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 144 57 305 102 10 8 2 18 4 3 153 2 4 104 70 480 East End Background 9 7 1 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 145 20 253 50 10 5 2 18 4 0 153 2 4 105 19 372 2017 VVMC Tris 60 23 21 2 0 60 83 80 82 78 4 4 76 162 (During Const) TOTAL 30 7 3 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 145 80 336 128 10 9 2 18 4 4 153 2 4 105 95 534 East End Background 9 7 1 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 146 20 254 50 10 5 2 18 4 0 154 2 4 105 19 373 (Const 2018 WMC Tris 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 Completed) TOTAL 9 7 1 0 10 0 0 61 0 0 146 22 256 51 10 5 2 18 4 0 154 2 4 105 20 375 Background 10 8 1 0 11 0 0 67 0 0 159 22 278 54 11 6 2 20 4 0 168 2 4 114 21 406 Build -out 2035 VVMC Tris 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 M 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 (Prior to 2035) TOTAL 10 8 1 1 1 0 1 11 1 0 1 0 67 0 0 159 24 280 55 1 11 1 6 2 1 20 4 0 168 2 4 114 22 408 Page 3 of 3 VVMC Master Plan TIS Proposed Roundabout Analysis Output [Intersection #1] • Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • Year 2018 PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 AM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A I N O _ . ,-- _7 �=Mzs 7V 9 III ��Ej kA Ul MOVEMENT SUMMARY " Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 8 T1 1 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 18 R2 70 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 Approach 88 3.0 0.114 5.8 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.53 0.51 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 1 L2 51 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 6 T1 800 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 16 R2 1 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 Approach 1065 3.0 0.387 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.11 0.03 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 4 T1 1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 14 R2 1 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 Approach 3 3.0 0.006 6.2 LOS A 0.0 0.4 0.58 0.47 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 2 T1 521 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 12 R2 13 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 Approach 535 3.0 0.237 5.4 LOS A 0.9 23.8 0.37 0.27 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.387 5.9 LOS A 2.0 50.9 0.21 0.13 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 24.0 3.7 22.2 22.3 24.5 13.7 24.0 13.1 23.6 23.7 4.1 22.0 16.5 13.2 24.5 13.2 24.2 1'09/ Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:17:50 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SID �ry SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com D P Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS B A B B A Ira -0V Se-. A=es4 90 a III MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 8 T1 1 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 18 R2 70 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 Approach 88 3.0 0.182 10.0 LOS B 0.5 12.2 0.52 0.52 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 1 L2 51 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 6 T1 800 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 16 R2 1 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 Approach 1065 3.0 0.437 7.4 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.12 0.04 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 4 T1 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 14 R2 1 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 Approach 3 3.0 0.009 10.2 LOS B 0.0 0.6 0.61 0.58 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 2 T1 521 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 12 R2 13 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 Approach 535 3.0 0.406 11.2 LOS B 1.8 46.4 0.53 0.48 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.437 8.7 LOS A 2.4 62.6 0.27 0.20 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 22.2 3.4 20.7 20.7 24.2 13.6 23.7 12.9 23.3 22.0 3.9 20.6 15.4 12.4 23.0 12.4 22.7 23.0 Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:14:01 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SID �ry SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com D P Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_HCM Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A I N O _ . ,-- _7 �=Mzs 7V 9 III ��Ej kA Ul MOVEMENT SUMMARY " Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 17 3.0 0.154 8.7 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 8 T1 1 3.0 0.154 4.3 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 18 R2 70 3.0 0.154 4.8 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 Approach 88 3.0 0.154 5.6 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.60 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 213 3.0 0.394 7.0 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 1 L2 51 3.0 0.394 5.5 LOS A 3.2 81.0 0.16 6 T1 800 3.0 0.394 0.6 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 16 R2 1 3.0 0.394 1.5 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 Approach 1065 3.0 0.394 2.1 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.16 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 1 3.0 0.006 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 4 T1 1 3.0 0.006 4.9 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 14 R2 1 3.0 0.006 5.3 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 Approach 3 3.0 0.006 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.6 0.59 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.247 7.0 LOS A 1.4 36.0 0.48 2 T1 521 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 12 R2 13 3.0 0.247 2.9 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.47 Approach 535 3.0 0.247 2.1 LOS A 1.4 36.4 0.48 All Vehicles 1691 3.0 0.394 2.3 LOS A 3.2 81.3 0.29 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akrelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.71 24.9 0.71 3.8 0.71 23.0 0.71 23.1 0.37 26.0 0.37 14.6 0.18 25.4 0.09 13.8 0.23 25.0 0.59 24.5 0.59 4.3 0.59 22.7 0.59 17.0 0.31 13.5 0.30 25.1 0.30 13.5 0.30 24.8 0.28 24.8 Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:21:59 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com D P Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 PM Peak Hour • HCM 2010— FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — FHWA-Approved Factors and Parameters • HCM 2010 — Default Factors and Parameters • SIDRA — Default Factors and Parameters TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A I N o— on I E,: -]rTT- -:-ss MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 8 T1 1 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 18 R2 75 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 Approach 80 3.0 0.160 9.3 LOS A 0.5 12.9 0.68 0.68 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 1 L2 82 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 6 T1 791 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 16 R2 2 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 Approach 1015 3.0 0.365 5.9 LOS A 1.8 46.8 0.05 0.01 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 4 T1 1 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 14 R2 1 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 Approach 4 3.0 0.007 5.9 LOS A 0.0 0.5 0.56 0.46 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 12 R2 27 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 Approach 1164 3.0 0.499 8.6 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.46 0.35 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.499 7.4 LOS A 2.7 68.7 0.29 0.21 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 22.7 3.2 21.1 20.9 24.7 13.8 24.1 13.1 23.3 23.5 4.3 21.9 18.2 12.7 23.6 12.8 23.4 23.3 Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:31:04 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd e a SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com JA Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Wolcott.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A I N o— on I E,: -]rTT- -:-ss MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.79 24.0 0.79 3.4 0.79 22.2 0.79 22.1 0.33 26.2 0.33 14.6 0.17 25.5 0.08 13.9 0.20 24.7 0.62 24.3 0.62 4.5 0.62 22.5 0.62 18.7 0.35 13.4 0.35 24.9 0.34 13.5 0.35 24.6 Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com JA Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS C A A C B I N o— on I E,: -]rTT- -:-ss MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 8 T1 1 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 18 R2 75 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 Approach 80 3.0 0.266 17.5 LOS C 0.7 18.1 0.73 0.76 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 1 L2 82 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 6 T1 791 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 16 R2 2 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 Approach 1015 3.0 0.380 6.2 LOS A 2.0 50.3 0.06 0.01 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.011 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.59 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 12 R2 27 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 Approach 1164 3.0 0.765 22.2 LOS C 7.8 200.1 0.78 0.82 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.765 14.8 LOS B 7.8 200.1 0.46 0.46 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 19.6 2.8 18.4 18.3 24.6 13.7 24.0 13.1 23.3 22.0 4.1 20.6 17.0 11.2 20.7 11.2 20.5 0497, Processed: Friday, August 01, 2014 8:11:26 AM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com SID L� A Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-PM_HCM Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Heli New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North West Intersection LOS A A A A A I N o— on I E,: -]rTT- -:-ss MOVEMENT SUMMARY V Site: 170 S FR Roundabout at Helipad New Site Roundabout South: Evergreen Access 3 L2 4 3.0 0.204 11.1 LOS B 0.8 21.0 0.73 8 T1 1 3.0 0.204 6.8 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 18 R2 75 3.0 0.204 7.2 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 Approach 80 3.0 0.204 7.4 LOS A 0.8 21.0 0.73 East: 170 S FR 1 u U 140 3.0 0.370 6.9 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 1 L2 82 3.0 0.370 5.4 LOS A 2.9 75.4 0.08 6 T1 791 3.0 0.370 0.5 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 16 R2 2 3.0 0.370 1.4 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 Approach 1015 3.0 0.370 1.8 LOS A 3.0 75.6 0.08 North: TOV Service Access 7 L2 2 3.0 0.008 9.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 4 T1 1 3.0 0.008 4.7 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 14 R2 1 3.0 0.008 5.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 Approach 4 3.0 0.008 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.57 West: 170 S FR 5 L2 1 3.0 0.517 7.3 LOS A 3.8 97.3 0.57 2 T1 1136 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.57 12 R2 27 3.0 0.517 3.2 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 Approach 1164 3.0 0.517 2.4 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.56 All Vehicles 2264 3.0 0.517 2.3 LOS A 3.8 98.2 0.35 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.79 24.0 0.79 3.4 0.79 22.2 0.79 22.1 0.33 26.2 0.33 14.6 0.17 25.5 0.08 13.9 0.20 24.7 0.62 24.3 0.62 4.5 0.62 22.5 0.62 18.7 0.35 13.4 0.35 24.9 0.34 13.5 0.35 24.6 Processed: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:33:07 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd SIDRA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.22.4722 www.sidrasolutions.com JA Project: D:\Project Files(P)\Active Projects\VVMC\Traffic Analysis\170 S FR Roundy_2018-AM_SIDRA Default.sip6 INTERSECTION 6 8000745, TURNKEY CONSULTING LLC, PLUS / 1 PC VVMC Master Plan TIS Frontage Road and VVMC Access / TOV Access [Intersection #2] • Year 2014 — Existing Condition • Year 2018 — East End (Construction Completed) o Existing Conditions o "First and Alone" Alternative ■ Sketch ■ Analysis Output • Year 2035 — Build -out Condition NOTE: The VVMC Access and TOV Access are offset by approximately 100 -feet. Because of the offset, they were modeled as two Tee -intersections to account for the impact of the offset. In the Synchro and Sim Traffic analysis output, the VVMC Access is listed as Intersection #2, and the TOV Access is Intersection #20. Turn Key Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Volume (vph) 477 11 84 707 3 18 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1853 0 2006 1863 1635 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.92 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 536 0 140 768 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt t r Volume (vph) 2 493 788 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1713 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.60 0.92 0.92 0.60 0.60 0.60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 536 857 65 13 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 0.4 3.3 0.3 31.0 3.2 0.6 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 17.6 11.5 0.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 2.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 11 47 64 32 Average Queue (ft) 0 23 4 14 95th Queue (ft) 6 48 30 37 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 103 27 Average Queue (ft) 1 6 5 95th Queue (ft) 10 59 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 31 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Volume (vph) 982 9 26 727 2 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 1859 0 2006 1863 1623 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.50 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1085 0 52 790 62 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt t r Volume (vph) 2 1009 748 5 13 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1729 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.50 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1097 813 10 36 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condtion SimTraffic Performance Report 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.0 0.8 9.3 0.2 46.2 4.5 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement 0.6 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total Network Performance 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 23.0 8.2 0.2 0.7 Denied Del/Veh (s) Total Del/Veh (s) 0.8 2.3 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing Condtion 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 4 38 40 59 Average Queue (ft) 0 15 2 20 95th Queue (ft) 3 41 22 48 Link Distance (ft) 466 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB SB Directions Served L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 75 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 12 95th Queue (ft) 5 51 35 Link Distance (ft) 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 39 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 WMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) Existing Conditions • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour Turn Key Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t Volume (vph) 523 21 191 775 9 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1637 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 596 0 255 842 83 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt t r Volume (vph) 2 574 963 39 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 624 1047 52 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) SimTraffic Performance Report 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.7 0.4 4.4 0.6 56.6 10.4 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement 0.2 1.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 2.8 0.4 18.2 15.7 Total Network Performance 0.3 1.9 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB Directions Served TR L T LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 51 80 115 Average Queue (ft) 1 34 23 35 95th Queue (ft) 9 49 75 79 Link Distance (ft) 466 0 54 148 Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 0 15 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 13 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 104 1 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 9 261 48 27 Average Queue (ft) 0 28 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 5 134 47 22 Link Distance (ft) 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 121 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� t r Volume (vph) 1077 39 116 797 8 148 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 16 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 180 25 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1852 0 2006 1863 1770 1583 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 100 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 2.7 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.75 0.75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1223 0 155 866 11 197 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 20:170 South FR & TOV Access Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt t r Volume (vph) 2 1223 908 5 5 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 16 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Length (ft) 25 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.969 Satd. Flow (perm) 2006 3539 1863 1583 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 100 500 198 Travel Time (s) 2.7 13.6 9.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 Growth Factor 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1329 987 7 11 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 679.2 705.7 2.7 3.7 524.5 307.6 474.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 69.5 71.6 81.1 1.2 850.2 43.5 50.0 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 691.5 729.8 0.1 0.1 402.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 110.8 0.4 280.8 632.0 48.0 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 657.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 94.6 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 - East End (Const Completed) 8/2/2014 Intersection: 2: VVMC Access & 170 South FR Movement EB WB WB NB NB Directions Served TR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 354 37 57 92 120 Average Queue (ft) 242 27 43 37 69 95th Queue (ft) 618 42 59 107 146 Link Distance (ft) 466 42 149 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 49 17 54 6 22 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 495 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 0 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 67 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 534 63 Intersection: 20: 170 South FR & TOV Access Movement EB EB WB WB SB Directions Served L T T R LR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 4 485 479 74 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 296 241 19 95th Queue (ft) 4 4 637 628 73 Link Distance (ft) 42 467 467 149 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 53 48 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1093 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2018 - East End (Construction Completed) "First and Alone" Alternative • Sketch • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership U-turn to facilitate VVMC access Ambulance only Acceleration lane for Eastbound TOV traffic f'l Main access to VVMC ! USB access .Sa glrk ToU- i'ifw r .PH is y VA e A a df,,I o f r vvzv AW -10 /-, i9.4T at-' T a��f` I�VQ /r It vy o%Q a s.Q lV e J7 K r c --r1 Q.,- �Lf- %Grh rr~viraT~tfee pre cji T4 V o'a �• � 0�f � q� y � *fJriJ1t•I � �w J tfekle I -e EQ a�7'y! 7-0 �J f e t e rf al�i�i v r�ai aria f r a��f` I�VQ /r It vy o%Q a s.Q lV e J7 K r c --r1 Q.,- �Lf- %Grh rr~viraT~tfee pre cji VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 9/30/2014 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- q 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt I tt y Volume (vph) 607 0 215 47 921 16 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.891 Flt Protected 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.990 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1643 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 660 0 234 51 1001 17 70 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 660 0 0 285 1001 87 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 9/30/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 647 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 7 0 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.993 0.865 0.955 Flt Protected 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Flt Permitted 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 1722 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1282 62 0 0 78 8 0 4 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 703 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 12 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] SimTraffic Performance Report 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 4.9 5.3 0.3 45.8 16.4 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement 0.0 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 3.5 16.4 Total Network Performance 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.5 Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.8 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB EB WB NB T T UL LR 5 3 116 126 0 0 54 48 4 3 93 95 168 168 125 1 0 200 Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) B203 NB SB T R LTR 11 70 34 0 29 9 7 55 31 92 114 126 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 9/30/2014 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 --I- q 4--- Lane Group EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt I tt y Volume (vph) 1265 0 137 75 987 4 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 200 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.872 Flt Protected 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 1805 3539 1619 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 Link Distance (ft) 200 300 200 Travel Time (s) 5.5 8.2 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 1375 0 149 82 1073 4 75 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1375 0 0 231 1073 79 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 9/30/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r Volume (vph) 0 1288 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 22 0 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.990 0.865 0.958 Flt Protected 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Flt Permitted 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 1726 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 300 380 200 200 Travel Time (s) 8.2 10.4 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1292 92 0 0 202 24 0 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1400 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 35 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 8/18/2014 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT WBU WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 13.3 14.7 0.3 139.6 34.6 2.6 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBL SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 9.1 19.4 6.3 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 4.1 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2035 - Build -out [No Roundabout] 8/18/2014 Intersection: 1: Evergreen Access & 170 South FR Movement EB EB WB NB B105 Directions Served T T UL LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 8 11 139 153 26 Average Queue (ft) 0 1 71 55 2 95th Queue (ft) 5 7 122 125 24 Link Distance (ft) 168 168 125 72 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement B203 B203 NB SB Directions Served T T R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 16 18 127 61 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 59 21 95th Queue (ft) 8 8 103 51 Link Distance (ft) 92 92 114 126 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 — Build -out Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 654 239 0 1179 57 0 0 72 0 0 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3514 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 711 260 0 1344 0 0 0 78 0 0 12 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 2.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.9 4.4 0.6 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.5 Total DelNeh (s) 1.0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement NB SB Directions Served R R Maximum Queue (ft) 55 33 Average Queue (ft) 23 10 95th Queue (ft) 44 34 Link Distance (ft) 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2035 - Build -out 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r t r r Volume (vph) 0 1310 183 0 1189 85 0 0 186 0 0 32 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 0 3504 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 500 500 200 200 Travel Time (s) 13.6 13.6 9.1 9.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1424 199 0 1384 0 0 0 202 0 0 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out SimTraffic Performance Report 7/31/2014 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 2.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 8.2 4.7 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied DelNeh (s) 0.4 Total DelNeh (s) 1.7 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2035 - Build -out Intersection: 2: VVMC Access/TOV Site & 170 South FR Movement WB NB SB Directions Served TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 4 124 48 Average Queue (ft) 0 51 22 95th Queue (ft) 4 95 49 Link Distance (ft) 472 146 160 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 7/31/2014 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Vail Road and Meadow Drive [Intersection #3] Year 2014 — Existing Condition Year 2017 — East End (During Construction) TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2014 - Existing Condition • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 28 7 3 1 10 1 1 60 1 1 143 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Flt Permitted 0.965 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1116 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 41 0 0 13 0 0 67 0 0 227 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 9.3 7.9 9.0 8.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 65 68 67 122 24 14 33 55 53 50 56 93 384 491 466 426 Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 123 10 9 2 18 4 4 151 2 4 103 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Flt Permitted 0.959 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1093 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 155 0 0 26 0 0 170 0 0 212 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.5 10.2 12.0 10.4 10.9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.1 PM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2014 - Existing 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 136 79 131 131 54 26 55 56 99 70 100 96 384 491 466 426 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Year 2017 - East End (During Construction) • AM Peak Hour • PM Peak Hour TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 7 3 1 10 1 1 61 1 1 145 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Flt Permitted 0.964 0.996 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1071 0 0 810 0 0 1162 0 0 1109 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 0 0 13 0 0 68 0 0 246 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 AM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 9.5 7.8 9.9 9.2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.8 AM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 38 48 43 96 23 18 35 63 50 56 54 114 384 491 466 426 Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS Lanes, Volumes, Timings Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 128 10 9 2 18 4 4 153 2 4 105 95 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Flt Permitted 0.958 0.996 0.999 0.999 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1066 0 0 801 0 0 1162 0 0 1091 0 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 408 515 490 450 Travel Time (s) 11.1 14.0 13.4 12.3 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 46% 46% 46% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 160 0 0 26 0 0 172 0 0 221 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 PM Peak Hour Synchro 8 Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.4 9.2 11.5 10.6 10.7 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.0 PM Peak Hour SirnTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 1 VVMC Master Plan TIS Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2017 - East End (During Const) 7/31/2014 Intersection: 3: Vail Rd & Meadow Dr Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 116 81 114 129 54 24 53 59 94 66 89 101 384 491 466 426 Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Mark Bunnell, PE, PTOE Page 2 VVMC Master Plan TIS FHU Memo Regarding Proposed Roundabout TurnKey Consulting, LLC Superior Nofeol Leadership P A FELSBURG (4 HOLT & ULLEVIG connecting and enhancing communities August 1, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kassmel, Town Engineer, Town of Vail FROM: Chris Fasching SUBJECT: Evergreen, VVMC, Municipal Center Roundabout FHU Reference 14-236 Introduction Various redevelopments are being considered along both sides of the South Frontage Road west of the Main Vail roundabout. One area includes the Municipal Center in which the existing eastern Municipal Center building would remain, but the western building would be replaced with a parking structure. Across the South Frontage Road, Evergreen and the Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC) are contemplating redevelopment as well. This memorandum specifically explores the nuances of various access schemes with respect to a roundabout intersection serving these uses. It is already anticipated that the roundabout would need to two lanes to function (and this analysis confirms that notion). Traffic Projections Peak hour traffic projections used in the analysis were developed from the long term projections from the latest travel demand model runs which were made in support of planning and design for the 1-70 underpass project near Simba Run. Further, available peak hour trip generation estimates associated with a potential Evergreen redevelopment and of a VVMC expansion have been accounted. The parking structure was assumed to contain 325 spaces in which one-half would be associated with a directional peak hour trip (inbound in the morning and outbound in the evening). Table 1 shows the various trip -making components and their assumed peak hour trip generation. These serve as the basis for analysis in assessing varying access scenarios. The VVMC has the potential of generating the greatest amount of traffic of the three uses, although the impact could end up being less than that shown. It should be noted that the estimates shown in Table 1 are rough at this point as the character and scale of each redevelopment is still evolving. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 504 �y Centennial, CO 80111 tel 303.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832 Www.Il-iueng.cf7m info@fl7aeng.coIll August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 2 Table 1 Peak Hour Traffic Components and Trip Estimates** * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. Inbound* Outbound* Component From West From East TO West TO East VVMC 24 (50) 217 (150) 11 (10) 64 (192) Evergreen Lodge 12 (25) 47 (75) 16 (4) 64 (69) Parking Structure 1 40 (15) 125 (40) 1 10 (40) 25 (125) * AM (PM) Peak hour in vehicles per hour. **Through traffic along the Frontage Road used in this was based on latest travel demand model run in support of 1-70 Underpass project. Access Alternatives A design charette, held July 16, 2014 in Vail, resulted in three fundamental alternatives to be analyzed; each has a sub -option as well. The primary alternatives locate the roundabout in a slightly different location along the Frontage Road, and the sub -options pertain to adjustments in access locations. The exception is Alternative 3a in which parcel access is the same as Alternative 3, but the roundabout is replaced with a U-turn bulb -out instead. Each alternative has been conceptually laid out and shown at the end of this memo. One of the constraints in locating the roundabout is to ensure it does not cross the 1-70 barrier line. Traffic Operations Sidra software was used to assess the operational aspects of a roundabout via calculating Level of Service (LOS). The analysis first assessed whether any form of a one -lane roundabout might suffice; it won't. A full two-lane roundabout is needed given the traffic numbers in Table 1. This was found to be the case for all the alternatives analyzed; two lanes are needed and would be sufficient even for those in which U -turning traffic would add demand. Further, two -lanes will be required along the Frontage Road approaches into the roundabout to achieve at least a LOS C under ideal conditions (actually, LOS B is achieved in every case). The one nuance revealed by the roundabout analysis pertains to the traffic queues that could form upon entering the roundabout. Specifically, the WB Frontage Road approach was found to potentially queue back past the parking structure entrance in Alternative 1 (more -so in Alternative 1a). This suggests that driveway access points onto the Frontage Road (that do not directly connect into the roundabout) should be located at least 125 feet from the roundabout along its entry leg. A sub -option in several of the alternatives pertains to the provision of a left -in to the VVMC. The analysis suggests that this left in movement could operate at LOS B with queues that could be accommodated in a 100 -foot lane. All the alternatives would allow flexibility in the event that this left -in movement exceeds the projection; the downstream roundabout would have excess capacity to accommodate it in the form of a U-turn. Comparisons Table 2 shows a matrix that simply highlights nuances and a few differences between the alternatives. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 3 Table 2 Roundabout Conceptual Design Options Matrix Alt. Description Notes Roundabout is located at the Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal west end of the municipal center conditions. The parking structure would not be easily accessed and would provide access into from the west. 1 Evergreen. The parking Right-in/right out driveway from Parking Structure onto structure would be accessed via Frontage Road may be too close to the roundabout. a right-in/right-out. The VVMC Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides would be provided a % access. of roundabout. Roundabout would serve more traffic than Alt. 1, but still operate at LOS B given ideal conditions. The parking structure would not be easily accessed from the west. Roundabout is located in same EB approaching traffic into roundabout would stack past location as described above. to the Parking Structure right-in/right-out; this is more 1 a The VVMC would be served via critical in 1 a than in 1. a right-in/right out only, other Emergency vehicles entering from the east would have than emergency traffic which a clear turn lane. could turn left into the facility. Retaining wall likely needed along south and west sides of roundabout. Possible driver expectancy issues in forcing lefts through roundabout; significant advance signage needed. Roundabout is shifted to the east (in the vortex are related to Roundabout will function at LOS B given ideal new helipad site), located conditions. 2 roughly mid -point of the Evergreen frontage. The Smooth parking structure entry operations would be parking structure would access required to preclude queuing into roundabout. directly into roundabout, and VVMC would be served via a % access. Roundabout is located in the Roundabout LOS would be A given ideal conditions. same location as described Patterns through the roundabout would be simpler 2a above. The right -in to the compared to 2 (no longer accommodating an EB left parking structures is shifted to nor a WB right). the east out of the roundabout. The parking structure will not be easily accessed from the west. August 1, 2014 Memo to Tom Kassmel Page 4 Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. Roundabout would function at a LOS B in ideal conditions. Roundabout is located to the May defy driver expectation given that there would not west up against Middle Creek be any kind of cross street connecting to roundabout. and is used to serve WB to EB The parking structure will not be easily accessed from u -turns (which includes left -in the west. Roundabout could also be used for EB to WB U-turns, 3 traffic for Evergreen, left -in traffic perhaps those exiting the Lionshead parking structure for VVMC, and left -out traffic desiring travel west; a right turn followed by a U-turn from parking structure). No may be easier than a left turn at peak times. direct access would be provided This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane via the roundabout. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed along south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. The U-turn traffic will operate at LOS C in ideal conditions, but this approach lane could see 250 -foot queues during the PM peak hour (reduced to 150 feet Roundabout is replaced with a +/- if a left -in is allowed at VVMC). This could be formal U-turn "bulb -out" area, challenging for parking structure traffic exiting that 3a which would be located in facility and needing to complete several lane changes approximately the same location in a relative short distance. as the roundabout in Alternative This option could incorporate an emergency left -in lane 3. for VVMC and/or a left -in lane to Evergreen. Retaining wall needed on south side of roundabout. Potential headwall/wing-wall work pertaining to Middle Creek. Summary A two-lane roundabout will function at LOS B in ideal conditions for any of the alternatives considered. Sensitivity to access placement is needed for some alternatives such that driveways are not too close to the entry legs of the roundabout and end up being blocked at peak times. Property owners should evaluate the constraints and opportunities with respect to their needs of redevelopment towards developing a balanced solution. This memo provides additional fodder in support of additional consideration and discussion. OPTION 1 1��\I iv vi, � ur v■ ME WE ME SIMMONS ■n m v■ ur nu. .uv i. wu■umuoWEMI• �uu. .iSEEMS - ..■ noun ,■uv- •uuuu► ME n� vuu■� v �uu■■► i vuu► ■■■■■■ numumNoun MMMMM_ .■. vu■� �uu■. vu■■. quo■. vu l • u■■■ ► .u■■■. �. ■WOMEN n■■■■. v■■■■. ■■■■■. vu■■. v■■o► .o MEMO► _ nuu. vuu on on i, vuo. WA 6-1 • sir �u■u■. r .• � � � • vou► vuu►. � •uuo• ■■._ v000. . a -v■oou■._-- -vuuouuo.-- -•■u■u■uu■uuu . -•■uuuuuu iii■u.-- --vuuu■ ouuuou..-- 1 M •� ,r M - ;' ICS OPTION 2 , LN 325 Stall-� Parking Structure : vpIp 4 op 71t - alb' pal .� OPTION 2a 0 40 80 SCALE: T-80' 325 Stall - Parking Structure Rl IF IF -moi pal .� 1 ............ ............. ... ... ..MEN � m IN�MEMNON NONE MEN -NOON■■■.. NOMEN ■■. :• -NOON■■.. -NOON■■.. NOON■■.. .NOON■. NOON■■. NOON■■. NOON■.. NOON■. .NOON■. •NOON■. .NOON■, .NOON. NOON■. .NOON. .NOON. .NOON. .NOON. .NOON, NOON. NOON■ .NOON. .NOON. NOON. .NOON. .NOON. was NOON. .■■■.. .NOON. NOON■. NOON■. .NOON. NOON■. . ■:.. r •NONE■, .NONE. .NOON. ,NOON■. � •uuu ,u■u. N.i�iii► i�■ouse MESON t vuu► uuo. � �uuu. - • vu■u.. vuu■■. -uuu■_ mossm .■.u■■■� v■■.■u._ ON •vuuu._ - v.uuo._ .uuoo._ vMEMMEo._ v■umouu■._ .uuuu.._ _ �.u■u■uu._ wassum M -" -vuuuuu.__ vuuu■uu.-_ - wuuuouu.'- • .u■uuuuu■---_ --vuoououuo.-- ' wuuuuuuuu■ --vuuu■uu■ iiia..__ vuuo■ uuou■■■..-_. uuouuuuuu..__ -- .00uuouuuuu.-_. R m \ RI/RO OPTION 3a Alk lc� 325 Stall ` Parking Structure I f v W.1911/190 ' -• mass::... - numom summummom wassummous mumm googol MUNMEN s � n r' r- - ` \ 1 \ RI/RO OPTION 3a Alk lc� 325 Stall ` Parking Structure I f v W.1911/190 ' -• mass::... - numom summummom wassummous mumm googol MUNMEN s � n r' r- -