Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB15-0147_B15-0147 Geotech report_1440600060.pdf~ech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL August 21, 2015 Keep Construction Attn: Brian Claydon P. 0. Box 3018 Edwards. Colorado 81632 thlclaydon@aol.com Hq1\\orth-P.rn1.1k Gc·otechnic.1!, Jn .. · 50~0 Ccunt)' l\P:lll i 54 l'"'iknwn ... l-1.J Spring), C'olnr,1d~: E!(~1:0'! l'hc>nc: '.i/l).945. /~lS.; F.ix 970.9.;:i.t'-+'i·I '-rn 11! Job No. I 15 385A Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Lower Stairway Wall, Existing Residence, Lot 50, Filing 2, Vail Village West, 1886 West Gore creek Drive, Vail, Colorado Dear Brian: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on August 18, 2015 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Keep Construction, dated August 17, 2015. The wall is lower downside wall of a new stairway from the street to the residence. The wall has been designed to be supported on a spread footing assuming an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. The upper wall has been constructed at this time. At the time of our site visit, the foundation excavation had been cut from about 6 to 10 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of relatively dense, silly sand and gravel with cobbles and scattered small boulders. The soils were too rocky to obtain undisturbed samples for swell-consolidation testing. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were generally moist. The upper wall footing appears to be bearing on similar soils. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural coarse granular soil designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed wall. The continuous footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches. Loose and disturbed soils in footing areas should be removed and the bearing level ex.tended down to the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils. The footings should be Parker 30.3-84 l -7119 • Colorado Springs 719-6 5 562 • Si!verthnme 970-468-l Q;)y Keep Construction August 21, 2015 Page 2 provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for on-site granular soils (excluding oversized rocks) soil as backfill. A foundation drain should be provided at the base of the walls to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. Structural fill placed within slab areas can consist of the on-site sand and gravel soils compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density (SPD) at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted to at least 90% SPD (95% in pavement areas) and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation. drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance. please call our office. Sincerely, Job No. 115 J85A