Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB150027_DRB150027 Engineering Structural Letter_1422915000.pdf ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz Structural Analysis & Evaluation Letter PROJECT AT&T COL04025 LTE 3C Red Sandstone 545 N. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 PREPARED FOR Integrated Design Services 6551 S. Revere Pkwy – Suite 220 Centennial, CO 80111 ISE Project No. 8844 January 21, 2015 ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers Telecommunications & Industrial Design PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz 2 January 21, 2015 ISE Job #: 8844 Matt Archer Integrated Design Services 6551 S. Revere Pkwy - Suite 220 Centennial, CO 80111 Subject: Structural Evaluation of existing Building Structure for proposed AT&T antenna additions. AT&T Site Designation: AT&T COL04025 LTE 3C Red Sandstone 545 N. Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Tower Owner/Site ID: Mr. Archer, At your request we have completed a structural evaluation of the existing building structure for AT&T antenna additions at a 35’-0” rad center elevation. The analysis presented herein was prepared per ANSI/TIA-222-G "Specification for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas" with a 90 mph (3-Sec Gust) Basic Wind Speed. We prepared the attached evaluation for loading as described in the AT&T RFDS dated 9/09/14. Per our analysis: 1. The Building structure has adequate capacity to support the proposed loading under 90 mph wind conditions as prescribed by ANSI/TIA-222-G. Customer shall review the antenna and equipment listing presented herein and confirm that the structure is accurately represented by our assumptions. We are pleased to have been of service for this project. If you have any questions please feel free to give us a call. Sincerely, Glen L. Hunt III, MS, SE/PE Principal Engineer ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers Telecommunications & Industrial Design PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Sheet ....................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 3 Project Information .......................................................................................................... 4 Analysis & Results........................................................................................................ 4-6 Conclusions & Recommendations .................................................................................. 6 1/21/15 ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers Telecommunications & Industrial Design PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz 4 PROJECT INFORMATION: Code Compliance: IBC 2012 Wind: IBC 2012 115 MPH Ultimate Wind Speed-reducible per 1609.1.1-Exception 5 ANSI/TIA-222-G, 90 MPH (3-Sec Gust) Basic Wind Speed, Structure Class II, Exposure C, Topographic Category 1 Soils: N/A Structure: 30’-0” AGL Building with 37’-2” AGL T/ Screen Structures Project Documentation Provided by Customer: Source Description Date IDS AT&T LTE 3C CD’s September 9, 2014 AT&T 3C RFDS August 27, 2014 ANALYSIS & RESULTS: Analysis Assumptions and Limitations  Information in the original design drawings or in the previous analysis that could not be verified by ISE is assumed to be correct.  All support structure components are assumed to be in adequate condition to carry their full design capacity.  The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances is assumed to be as specified in this report.  Emergency/essential communication equipment is not located on the structure. Antenna Loading: The existing AT&T antennas are mounted on the rooftop of the building within a 4-sided screen structure at a rad center elevation of 35’-0” above grade. The equipment configurations considered for this analysis are as follows: Existing: Alpha (1) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (2) Powerwave 7770 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR Panel Antenna (53#) ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers Telecommunications & Industrial Design PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz 5 (1) Raycap DC-48-60-0-9E Surge Arrestor (33#) (3) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (3) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) Beta (2) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR (53#) (2) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (2) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) Gamma (2) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR (53#) (2) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (2) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) Proposed: Alpha (1) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) Powerwave 7770 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) CCI HPA45R-BUU-H4 Panel Antenna (64#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR Panel Antenna (53#) (1) Raycap DC-48-60-0-9E Surge Arrestor (33#) (2) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (2) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) (1) ALU RRH2x60—1900A-4R (46#) Beta (1) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) CCI HPA45R-BUU-H4 Panel Antenna (64#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR (53#) (1) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (1) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) (1) ALU RRH2x60—1900A-4R (46#) ISE, Incorporated Structural Engineers Telecommunications & Industrial Design PO Box 50039  Phoenix, Arizona  85076  Office: (602) 403-8614  Fax: (623) 321-1283  www.ISE-INC.biz 6 Gamma (1) Powerwave 7750 Panel Antenna (39#) (1) CCI HPA45R-BUU-H4 Panel Antenna (64#) (1) Powerwave P45-16-XLH-RR (53#) (1) Powerwave CM1007-DBPXBC-003 Diplexer (3#) (1) Powerwave TT19-08BP111-001 TMA (22#) (1) ALU RRH2x40W-07L (52#) (1) ALU RRH2x40-AWS (44#) (1) ALU RRH2x60—1900A-4R (46#) Existing equipment weight total = 928# Proposed equipment weight total = 1066# Total weight increase = (1066 – 928)/928 = 14.9% The proposed equipment weight is within 15% of the existing equipment dead load. By inspection, the existing mount frame has adequate capacity for the proposed equipment loading. The proposed antennas and equipment will be mounted entirely within the existing screen structure, and will not contribute any additional wind area to the design wind loading scenarios. The existing antenna support structures and building structure have adequate capacity for the proposed equipment loading. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On the basis of our analytical and comparative engineering evaluation we find that the existing building and antenna support structures have adequate capacity for the proposed AT&T antenna and equipment configurations under TIA-222-G load conditions. This analysis assumes that the existing structures are in adequate condition to carry their full design capacity. We are pleased to have been of service for this project. If you have any questions regarding this report please feel free to give us a call.