Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB150081_VGNCH drb comments final_1427304120.pdf ARCHITECTURE  PLANNING  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  INTERIORS P.O. BOX 1976, Avon, CO 81620  970.949.0257  www.zehren.com March 23, 2015 Design Review Board Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81658 Re: Vail Golf and Nordic Clubhouse, Design Review Response Board Members: The Town of Vail and Vail Recreation District are proposing to redevelop the Vail Golf Course Clubhouse in accordance with the conditions set forth in the 2013 Conditional Use Permit. This letter, and the enclosed revisions to the previously submitted documents, are intended to respond to the November 7, 2012 Design Review Board conceptual review comments as documented in April 22, 2013 Memorandum to the Planning and Environmental Commission. DRB Comment #1 The Board was generally complementary of the building design direction and the proposed landscaping plan. Response #1 The landscape plan has been enhanced:  The cart path has been straightened and landscape modified to accommodate the existing netting along the north edge of the building. The originally proposed baffled, (angled), netting has not been installed.  The berm along the east edge of the practice and teaching green has been eliminated to allow adequate area for golf circulation. Landscaping from this area has been relocated to the existing eastern maintenance path. DRB Comment #2 The clubhouse should have traditional mountain architecture detailing; rather than contemporary mountain architecture detailing. Response #2 The proposed detailing is consistent with other, more recent municipal buildings including those adjacent to the Lionshead Parking Structure and within Ford Park. In addition, other recently completed residences within the golf course neighborhood are consistent the proposed clubhouse improvements. The town code generally regulates “detailing” through adopted design review guidelines: “Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with Vail's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration ARCHITECTURE  PLANNING  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  INTERIORS P.O. BOX 1976, Avon, CO 81620  970.949.0257  www.zehren.com of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with the guidelines herein contained.” The selected exterior materials, including rough cut stone, rough sawn siding and timbers, and crenellated, three ply roof shingles reference a more “traditional” or rustic aesthetic. DRB Comment #3 There needs to be a consistent architectural theme among all golf course buildings. Response #3 Adopted town codes do not regulate “architectural theme”. The town code generally regulates “consistency” through the adopted design review guidelines: “Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with Vail's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with the guidelines herein contained.” As certain existing structures within the golf course property limits are not currently anticipated to be redeveloped or renovated, it is unlikely that all golf course buildings will have a consistent theme. The proposed architectural “theme” is consistent with other, more recent municipal buildings including those adjacent to the Lionshead Parking Structure and within Ford Park. Other recently completed structures within the surrounding neighborhood, and within view of the golf course, have an architectural “theme” consistent with the proposed redevelopment. DRB Comment #4 The proposed primary ridge should be “broken up” with a ridgeline step, dormer architectural projection, or some other method. Response #4 An architectural projection has been added to the ridgeline. The town code regulates architectural projections through the adopted design review guidelines: Towers, spires, cupolas, chimneys, flagpoles, and similar architectural features not usable as habitable floor area may extend above the height limit a distance of not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the height limit nor more than fifteen feet (15'). The proposed non-habitable architectural feature extends forty two inches above the currently approved primary ridgeline. DRB Comment #5 The north elevation of the clubhouse should be more decorative. ARCHITECTURE  PLANNING  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  INTERIORS P.O. BOX 1976, Avon, CO 81620  970.949.0257  www.zehren.com Response #5 Revisions have been made to reduce the roof height, modify the gable roof forms, and to provide additional decorative materials which are consistent with town guidelines. DRB Comment #6 Exterior signage should be considered at this time and not at the end of the project design development. Response #6 Building identification, (commercial), signage locations have been indicated on the landscape plan and building elevations. As sign graphics have not yet been developed, a separate Sign Application in accordance with adopted town codes will be provided at a later date. DRB Comment #7 The vehicle entrance should be visually enhanced to reduce confusion about which driveway should be used to enter the site. Response #7 Vehicle access has been designed in accordance with adopted town codes to comply with minimum service vehicle clearances and approved operational plans. Signage, including a new monument sign and directional signage, will be provided to identify vehicle and service entrances and exits. As sign graphics have not yet been developed, a separate Sign Application in accordance with adopted town codes will be provided at a later date. DRB Comment #8 Electric power should be incorporated into the landscape plan to facilitate the lighting of a “holiday tree” or trees. Response #8 Electrical power is indicated at selected site lighting fixtures. Please let me know of any questions or concerns. Thank you. Timothy Losa, AIA Principal Zehren and Associates, Inc.