The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe_ Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application(2) (2)From:jackhunn@yahoo.com To:Chad Salli Cc:mary@Ann.Evans; Bill Gibson Subject:Re: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Date:Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:04:42 PM Chad, Thank you very much for your willingness to expedite the process for us. However,our consultant informs us that our existing permit with CDOT is limited to the 24(21) residential units only and that we really need to update our permit to recognizethe intended additional uses. Therefore, we will proceed with the permitting process and will keep you appraisedof our progress. Because I believe that an approval is imminent, we request that webe allowed to market our spaces while we seek the amended permit. Respectfully, Jack hunn Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® From: Chad Salli <CSalli@vailgov.com>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:00:27 +0000To: Bill Gibson<BGibson@vailgov.com>;'jackhunn@yahoo.com'<jackhunn@yahoo.com>Cc: Tom Kassmel<TKassmel@vailgov.com>Subject: RE: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Jack If you can have Skip draft up a letter stating that the addition of the 40 leased spaces do not require a new CDOT access permit per the access code (section 2.6) and the back up to support his finding. I am fine with you moving forward. Thanks Chad From: Bill Gibson Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:15 AMTo: Chad SalliSubject: FW: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application From: jack hunn [mailto:jackhunn@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:00 PMTo: Bill GibsonCc: Mary Anne EvansSubject: Vail Mountain View - Parking calculations for our application Bill, As discussed on the phone today, here are the calculations from our consultant, Skip Hudson,regarding the limit of permitted parking before triggering the need for a decelleration lane on the Frontage Road. Skip has been in contact with CDOT to confirm their requirements. Skipis aware of our original permit application and the calculations that supported the existing permit. Ideally, we would like your concurrence to proceed to lease up to 40 seasonal spaces, stayingwithin the limits that Skip has identified. We would like to avoid the time and expense of going through the process with CDOT to update our permit. The best time to promote theleasing of these spaces is between now and the end of October and we don't want to miss out on the opportunity. Please let me know your thoughts at your earliest convenience. Respectfully, Jack Hunn From: Skip Hudson <skiph@turnkeyllc.net>Subject: RE: CDOT response To: jackhunn@yahoo.comDate: Monday, September 27, 2010, 6:06 AM Regarding 21 units, the trip generation would be 9 vph am & 11 vph pm, as shown below 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 1 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 8 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 9 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 7 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 4 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 11 I didn’t do the traffic study that the permit was based on so I don’t know why 24 condos = 10 trips. The ITE reference document has changed since then so it could be a different reference. In any case, the new traffic study supporting the permit for this effort will need to show 21 condos = 11 trips. However, we are dealing with the peak hour traffic volume that would make the eastbound right turn into the project driveway. In this case, the afternoon inbound volume is the highest case with 7 vph inbound. Assuming no employees, the new equation would be: 47 total allowed – 7 for condos = 40 parking spaces available (assuming no employee parking) Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation ofprivacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC. From: jackhunn@yahoo.com [mailto:jackhunn@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:31 AMTo: Skip HudsonSubject: Re: CDOT response Skip, Thank you very much for your efforts and for your preliminary assessment of our situation and the opportunity to lease some of our surplus spaces. We had discussed the fact that some of the original 24 condos were joined together by buyersof multiple units. There are really only 21 residences now in the final configuration of ownership. How many spaces might we lease with these adjustments? Jack Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® From: "Skip Hudson" <skiph@turnkeyllc.net> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:00:11 -0600 To: <jackhunn@yahoo.com> Subject: CDOT response I talked to CDOT and found you current permit. Here are the main points: 1. Permit is for 24 condo units, which equals 10 trips per hour at the driveway (two way)2. CDOT wont apply any credits for “second home” unless we do a week of traffic counts to verify what is happening now (this would cost $2,500 alone – I use a subconsultant out of Denver for counts and this would be their cost) 3. So your “base” demand would be 10 trips for condos 4. CDOT is not comfortable going right up to the allowed 50 trips per hour andthey want a 5% buffer, so the max we could show in the study would be 47 trips. Is this worth your while, and should I still prepare the proposal? thanks Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation ofprivacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC. From: Skip Hudson Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:27 PMTo: 'Jack Hunn (jackhunn@yahoo.com)'Subject: Skip Hudson contact info Here is my info. Thanks for contacting me about this work. Respectfully, Skip Hudson, P.E. TurnKey Consulting, LLC O: 970-985-4001 F: 970-985-4002 C: 970-314-4888 skiph@turnkeyllc.net 2478 Patterson Road, Suite 18 Grand Junction, CO 81505 ü Please consider the environment before printing this email This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation ofprivacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information byanyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to TurnKey Consulting, LLC.