HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC16-0014 Narative .pdf Village
Inn Plaza
Vail Village Inn, SDD #6, Phase III
Major Amendment to
Special District No . 6
Expansion of Units 501 & 502 with
Exterior Modifications
March 10, 2016
1 °ImiMIZ EGGFjRS
ARCHITECTURE INC.
1450/VCX.4 U 4 VVITOX 50:11N21.90 PO BOX 798 KRIIMMLING,CO 80459
Pie 00224 (970)724-3411 FAX:(970) 724-3412
arp.CX / y,Z� FrLK 1,2W �s7 don.eggers@eggersarchitecture.com
I. Introduction
The owners of units 501 and 502, Lublan S.A., represented by Loguer Design and Eggers
Architecture, Inc., are requesting an amendment to the previously approved Amended
Special Development District No.6 (SDD#6). Unit 501 (parcel #: 2101-082-54-027) is
proposing to not make the major exterior changes to the building as previously approved,
but to only add skylights to the exterior. Unit 501 is proposing to add 264 square feet to
the GRFA vs. the 277 square feet previously approved. Unit 502 (parcel #: 2101-082-54-
028) is proposing to keep the previously approved exterior changes and adding an
additional 57 square feet of GRFA. The Unit 502 approval included an increase to the
GRFA by 515 square feet and the inclusion the addition of secondary roof form. The
modification of Unit 502 also included the relocation of an existing mechanical mezzanine
to a newly constructed area with a net square footage loss of 49 square feet. According to
Section 12-9A-2: Definitions, Vail Town Code, an increase of GRFA is considered a Major
SDD Amendment.
Unit 501 is proposing to undergo a complete interior remodel. The current plan includes 4
bedrooms, 4 baths and major living spaces on the main level of 2145 square feet. This
plan has a loft area overlooking the main living space that includes 322 square feet. The
remodel proposes to redesign the main level with an entry area expanded in to the
common hallway between units 501 and 502. The new square footage of the main level
will be 2255 square feet, an increase of 110 square feet from the HOA Common Area.
Additionally, the loft area will be remodeled with an additional 154 square feet of GRFA
added from existing attic space. Total new GRFA will be 2731 square feet, representing
an increase of 264 square feet. The previously approved changes included 277 square
feet of additional GRFA.
Unit 502 is proposing to maintain the previously approved remodel and addition of 515
square feet to the GRFA. The current proposal also includes adding an additional 57
square feet of space on the main level from existing attic space. The previously approved
roof element is above the main ridgeline of the building but lower than the two elevator
tower units on each side of the dormer. This element would remain and the roofing in this
area only is proposed as DaVinci synthetic shake. The new proposal would bring the total
GRFA of the unit to 1971 square feet, a total increase in the GRFA of 572 square feet.
Floor plans of the proposed changes are provided below:
-I
...._....._.
l 1 11 1 i iti i
rulAO
I I n di
i
1 .
II 1 4 1
IKEA& am ro 411
1- 1
A all. I 1111 - li. iT4 .r
,.-
_L . ..... AI .
1
L .... r . -- di :
iAvIm .
.E2,:r-:: , .A.mr. •,, r ,1 4.1.1 1,!
•..N•• -
I .==. ".
_.—.- . r7,7I, 48
.4i1 .44!1 ' '
lk KR* N'', IPIIii.-' 0 5 i
11.11104111
• " •. iii t WA I Iii,"NPIi"" I
;rile IRMA IM iii , ,..
,.\_60.. _
N2
1111111111111 IMI U11111: 1 R2
. -•-•-•..•-•
M.. t.l• -4..-
Fig
-• .e p- i - __.itl.i =:30 "1—
I
ie.-. I/ an ' ---..
—
1! I i
.'g./ • A
71 igkm ,
"111 \‘•- ri 15117 'W.--;—---
mag 1744 -'1
1
a I"I•A- ' C=•=.7.-,..-.—
OW VI a I f s L T APPROVFO RPri-IR OOR I PO% rOPO8EP Prrti-i Pi_ocie Levtri, Al.2
, II
4, ELDIIIIM 61-111
111
IBMI MO NM
LII
1-2 sm Impor, m. imp 2111
VIII
Ili I
1.151 1.11.MMd
1 t !I . Iv cill.
114— I.
. Ir_ II m . ---
::: ii ii: i.
::: !! :'.
:Mt! :.'• :: ,: :Mal iN 0 57f
NIMENT, willir . ..1.= IT:rbar.-4:-\..............rr ..imi 1 pg
1111*/ L
I.,.
51111114M.P.J.
e
BE
...,
IR,I . i
I
I
• ,t,
i I
1 .--."- -1----- A1.3
rENTOJELV APPROVED LT 9•QLOFTLEV%
II. Background
Village Inn Plaza is located at 100 East Meadow Drive. The property is part of Phase III of
Special Development District No. 6, Vail Village Inn. This SDD has an underlying zoning of
Public Accommodation PA . See vicinit map of pro•ert below:
I.
-_ .F iN- ..� }'+ ti, r �
Jr': -:# ' ; `
Ar
•
•
. S r
l4
r-titin,..„._ ,,,I,. _
..
0
,_ L.gi ,,
�. .., ,.� .R. •
"ter . , '-'-•...4.:-.-.,•-•; ++• '
,.
S. i li �Y� •'.l•"
ii$!$
. _
, .. h'''el*3.. _ . ...*; wilt. .. ':.i:: f.f:,;i.t...t.,. 4 • ' ,,,4 .4 Or'.'•:.7'1;T::'•-•, : 904tiv—ItATIC e",.9f[h
SDD #6 was adopted by Ordinance No. 7 of 1976 and has undergone multiple
amendments since is adoption. Most of the amendments have been associated with the
other phases of the SDD. The structure has seen minor changes since its original
construction, mainly exterior window updates and interior remodels, but remains largely
unchanged from its original construction. The proposed modifications will be add some
exterior detail and update the appearance of the building to match the architectural
detailing of the more recently constructed adjacent properties. See photo of the frontage
road view taken from the north side of the highway:
r .,. IR. . +.•-:.`b}I!: I i'
, ''J Sir` alf `, •,1- m,t !
11 P i' H
‘Nlii . - 11 ''ild ii ..'.'.:4 : .
,,.„,,,a. . . .,' ',• '1, V., ' 1/1*
=r . w'r, - !. r. t' ''• yr IM- ., -'—4I
,N— =-.`Pw "— _ c . -Y. • -- .- fir;-. jI •
Vail Village Inn deviates from the maximum height limitation set forth in the Public
Accommodation zone district of 48 feet for sloped roofs. Building heights were defined by
number of stories in the original adoption of SDD#6 and further illustrated in a drawing
created by consultants Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey dated February 12, 1976. The
building was constructed according to these height restrictions and has not been modified
since. The previously approved roof mass over unit 502 is lower than the adjacent
elevator shaft elements, therefore not affecting the overall building height. See drawing
below:
+--_.-.�4- 2._._ Tw - T : m''.-.------
-�__�— -=------ In ■■■■� in =_ - -..o.._
■19111 ��'ARr1 il in _ "� l i
#aw....�,.-. L r r r r r_A-•'••.'. IIII u . ". _a,.r...,�- p II
Ii■1191111 �} J !11
r r r r r l IIIIIII1IIIII Jill _ 1111111111111_114- ...- I imam 11.-----'- ..,---=-4'
1:� I... - `E li
�...,..,� ■r r W W I _ IIIIIIIIIIII_i g111111llIllIll . _ Wry
I� 1 i-��������I11I ® -••0 . Q ON IIIIIIIIII i W
�.....,.�. II —. +�.r.-
11
471-1 -1111-.4.r. i_'y-' x„11 .® :[- ■.._® •II•IIIIIIIIIII,I ll 11 . 017=1.-
I
OOIRN ELEVATION-PIBGPOBEO
]�
ia 5g
a , iit., o gR
--•�.-.-L_ _._.— 111 111 _. _. .�......� 2
119111 ��"=■_� 8
■1191111 E■• ® ■• lum4.
�._..- M Y 4 11 Y I IIIIIIIIIIII _ . .„...,,_. 1116._,,,.....311 -- .........-
■1191111 II _
a.rw..�_.I Y Y Y 11 Y _ JIB„
T_z..
I ■1191111 ■■■ 11 ® g I ® �■ l =
¢a...n.... Y Y Y 11 Y I IIIIIIIIIIII: I 1:::::... f1�. - I .+...wr..
■�7 ■r; 11 ® EJ cD ■i 1... ,E
— 2; - -tp:`- • _ [:::: - _- Yr[WWWWillllllllllll , _. •
CD
▪ �4_ f - — -u= 11 .
�— — ”- A2.1
$SOIRN ELEVATION-IXPOTMG
There are no additional parking requirements as the number of units is not changing.
Ill. Zoning Analysis
The proposed modification only affects the GRFA and Employee Housing standards of the
zoning analysis. All other standards are unchanged and remain as approved by Special
Development District #6.
Standard Existing Previously Approved Proposed
GRFA
Unit 501 2467 sf 2744 sf (+277) 2731 sf (+264)
Unit 502 1399 sf 1914 sf (+515) 1971 sf (+572)
Parking 1.4 per unit no change no change
Employee Housing Approved prior 79 sf(pay-in-lieu) 83 sf(pay-in-lieu)
to Inclusionary
Requirement
IV. Criteria for Review for the Major Amendment to a Special Development District
Section 12-9A-8: Design Criteria and Necessary Findings in the Vail Town Code provides
the criteria for review of a Major Amendment to a Special Development District. Below is a
listing of the criteria and how the proposal complies with each:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building
height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation.
Proposed: The architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity,
character, visual integrity and orientation remains largely unchanged as a result of the
proposed amendment. The roof changes fit between the existing elements, therefore the
height remains the same as constructed.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
Proposed: There is no change to the use, activity or number of dwelling units within the
proposed amendment. The increase is GRFA is consistent with the intent of Chapter 15 of
the Vail Town Code and without the size of the roof elements would qualify as a minor
amendment to the SDD.
3. Parking and Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
chapter 10 of this title.
Proposed: The addition of GRFA does not affect the parking requirements for the units
and is unchanged.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive
plan, town policies and urban design plans.
Proposed: Village Inn Plaza is within the boundaries of the Vail Village Master Plan and
further located within Mixed Use Sub-Area #1. The following objectives of the master plan
are applicable to this application:
Objective 1.2:
Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities.
Objective 2.5:
Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and
commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests.
5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic
hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements as there are no
changes proposed for the site plan.
7. Traffic:A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off site traffic circulation.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district.
Proposed: The above criterion is not affected by the proposed improvements.
V. Photo images:
Below are images taken from Meadow Drive and the Frontage Road. The proposed improvements
are not visible from other locations within the Village.
,;re: . :N
,Sir, 1 l' 1 t ' El:::•'' ' -.--
..moi atr -.rift-.riftf
From Meadow Dr.
ii •
1
1r
..i ...
r i II
\'-:.--."i=•-_•• •Li.. : —
. .. .. .. , .
‘. ... ;
—- 1011P1»fisnwraT•u •PAPPWA.4.5.4.%5444141' II
.. .... 2,.
•.r,.. -'," •:.-.1,.
..., .• '-'7. - .•
NONNI 111111`.111111111. . .A..V
-lir di ,
. .
: ••• .- .. .......- .... .;: i. ..ILL
L...qt,H• -. :Lr. . ....
.....
. le-. •
-...? •-•'' .- . ; ,'.' • ..L . ' .- i '..!-•f ..'..j:::' LLi,1 IV
•,,,.. - .r4.4 rEi-rr • ,,•Tif pi- :..:.?Seq. .-,........1- - . .
7,. '4.-.' . . --,...,0 -: :'4YJJW.1'.. :'1 .:; •..1
14 71. .L fi .-7 i-'.-•' ;. -- .:, • :: -...:-...-4,_"...:,:.-:::::. - . -..." :"-`.
-:-%' ' F ...:::! - 44; .;...• :4,..•,,..J7,:•_•!: ::::•,,-,-- .i ), . :,:',-.. .
;i:'•••• -, ----7t -I -0 .,;... .--::'...', ":'..-. -'..--•• . 'k ..'' -
..•./,,. ,41i- . •:, /....-• • ...... • .
i* . eijf•L _ ..-'2,. .,1•0:-,. .. , _,. ._. •••,
- . -.,,, i• ;_.. -.. .• -- . ..__.
401• 4r..- - - '- .1.'.-- .---: .:-.•:-'*-. -
; )fr' •
'Pr,
...„0, .v. ..
)if . (T4'••
f:•:9.-- r-''-
s
•„•:.
:• , ,
• ..:'..
From walk below Vail Village Plaza
,. ,...•,--
_•,i ., .._. ,
- 1
,' ••/
Pi • • ...i:'-'- •
..P1
QI ..' ----'' r" .• •
:L. , ;'
ti I
4 '.r: AV ' illk
..L.i. . - . :: !.0 ii IL ' •
$' -.--.,• 4.4„ .
, .
AP .•-•.; 9,.. . •
-•-•,.- •
.• -...--
•f
•'i - -.. -ie. -I
.ymi.i.. .44.-• .
tilif.L „ :•. 1 '.-.1:::.:''
.i• •••,.. t . 1- Ir.::
' ...• .' L. ... .' '...,k,:1,
...4 t.,.
,..
.:.-, .
--•''. .... \b.—':i''' ' . -I i 1
1.-1-1
-. . .,:-: ..kN.- ' . -t-likt •.• -',-. "•:.. i.,1,,...I,
•
_., .. . ... ... . ,
. . .-4- --- •
,
. ••••,,,,m1TICIECSAL ‘.....4 . 1' .'
• '_'• ...L ''....104--`‘4...• .-14LI 1
., .' • - --AL..40.•••1•411"11r1R•--
1.71iliti- . . :• --
^ "'"240mh-, ,I,'Aid.,.
:I•", Mr 9 .• •.r i•
I • •. ' ' ' •• :'''•1 - klIA ••-
_,., • ''.i N.. ';'"....: •--•
. ..•.-.
.... .
gi_:-..--
..--------- From walk below Sebastian
-
VI. Adjacent Property Owners
Vail Gateway Plaza Condo Association
do Vail Tax & Accounting
PO Box 5940
Avon, CO 81620
Vail Plaza Hotel (Sebastian)
c/o Timbers Resorts
16 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657
Village Inn Plaza Phase I,II,V
do Jonathon Staufer, Manager
100 E. Meadow Drive, #31
Vail, CO 81657
Solaris
do Peter Noble, John Boord
2211 N. Frontage Road, Suite A
Vail, CO 81657
One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association
do Corporation Service Company
1560 Broadway, Suite 2090
Denver, CO 80202
One Willow Bridge Road Condo Association
4148 N Arcadia Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Talisman Condo Association
do Ptarmigan Management
62 E. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Sonnenalp
do Johannes Faessler
20 Vail Road
Vail, CO 81657