HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Inspection reports.pdfFINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
Project: __ S_F_R_17_4_0_S_ie_r_ra_T_ra_i_I _______ _ Permit Number: BP 16-0243
Project Location: __ 17_4_o_s_ie_rr_a_T_r_a_i1,_v_a_i_I, _c_o_8_1_6_5_7 _____________ _
owner 17 40 Sierra Trail , LLC
122 West Timber Draw v ·1 81657 Address --------------City: _a_1 ____ Zip: _____ _
Design Professional In Charge: ____ M_a_t_t_W_a_d_e_..;.y ________________ _
Address: PO Box 97
City: Edwards State: CO Zip: 81632 Phone: (970) 926-3373
Fax:-----------E-mail: Wadey@alpinecivil.com
To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief, the special inspections and/or testing required for
this project, have been completed in accordance with the contract documents.
Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for, and are to be
considered an integral part of this final report. Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports
have been corrected.
Prepared by:
/o-Jc:;-fJ
Date
Preparer's Seal and Signature Required
the perimeter drainage system designed by Alpine Engineering in connection with
FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
Project: SFR 17 40 Sierra Trail Permit Number: BP 16-0243
Project Location: __ 1_7_4_o_s_i_e_rr_a_T_ra_i_I, _v_a_il,_c_o_8_1_6_5_7 _____________ _
Owner 17 40 Sierra Trail , LLC
Address 122 West Timber Draw City: Vail Zip: _8_1_65_7 __ _
Design Professional In Charge: __ D_a_ve_Y_o_un_g_,_H_P_K_um_a_r -------------
Address: __ 5_0_20_C_o_u_nty~R_o_a_d _____________________ _
City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip: 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454 E-mail: dyoung@kumarusa.com
To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief, the special inspections and/or testing required for
this project, have been completed in accordance with the contract documents.
Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for, and are to be
considered an integral part of this final report. Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports
have ~en corrected. L .. f.
fflr f;,'1ur1.dah'ori 'elt9:l~ l;;)CC,rt~jr Ct>rlCJe-c.
reM Porc,,emt,t.-tf ~ ~ovtcre.,f.e t1 (o tcrfl'e5
tl-vLd $f1e.vij-b'h ()11 /y.
Prepared by: ~l).v1d 4 .. iUv12
~~
Date
Preparer's Seal and Signature Required
H-P~KUMAR
-0 i{'J,
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 94S.7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-477
Date Cast: 01-30-17
Sheet: 1of1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Mat Foundation; Lower Level
Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 8:11 am Load Size (Yds):
Truck No: 134 Time Arrived: 9:15 am Yds Delivered:
Ticket No: 309390 Time Placed: 9:30am Yds Ordered:
Mix Design: 3500 psi % Exterior with 1% non-chloride accelerator
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
9:35 am
24°
68°
None
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
Sample Point:
141.6 pcf
4% inches
4.5%
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was infonned of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 9:45 am
10
20
70
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box in Heated Tent
Date in Lab: 01-31-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 53° Min/Max: 49°n1°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
026A 7 02-06-17 50,700 4.01 12.63 4010
0268 28 02-27-17
026C 28 02-27-17
026D Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com)
Nova Group • David Irwin (snaooutofit2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (recfclifftr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
Justin Orgill
njf Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945.a454
Email: hQkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-477
Date Cast: 01-30-17
Sheet: 1of1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Mat Foundation; Lower Level
Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 8:11 am Load Size (Yds):
Truck No: 134 Time Arrived: 9:15 am Yds Delivered:
Ticket No: 309390 Time Placed: 9:30am Yds Ordered:
Mix Design: 3500 psi 3/4 Exterior with 1 % non-chloride accelerator
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
9:35 am
24°
68°
None
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
Sample Point:
141.6 pcf
4Yz inches
4.5%
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 9:45 am
10
20
70
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box in Heated Tent
Date in Lab: 01-31-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 53° Min/Max: 49°n1°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi) Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2
026A 7 02-06-17 50,700 4.01 12.63 4010
0268 28 02-27-17 66,200 4.01 12.63 5240
026C 28 02-27-17 66,700 4.01 12.63 5280 5250
0260 28 02-27-17 65,900 4.01 12.63 5220
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick <!sanovk;k@gmall.com>
Nova Group -David Irwin fsnaQC?ytoQU@m!n.com)
Todd Rainville (radcllmr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
Justin Orgill
/ljf Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
H-P~t<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkgleowood@kumarusa.com
I I
' '-
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-4n
Date Cast: 02-10-17
Sheet: 1of1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Lower Level Foundation Walls
Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 11:21 am Load Size (Yds): 10
Truck No: 133 Time Arrived: 12:14 pm Yds Delivered: 10
Ticket No: 309456 Time Placed: 12:30 pm Yds Ordered: 40
Mix Design: 3500
Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck Discharge
Time Sampled: 12:40 pm Wet Unit Wt: 141.6 pct
Air Temp: 50° Slump: 4.0 inches
Concrete Temp: 65° Air Content: 7.0%
Water Added: None
Communication: The contractor and supplier were informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 12:50 pm
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated cure box in heated tent
Date in Lab: 02-13-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 47° Min/Max: 47°/86°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 I Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days I lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
035A 7 02-17-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600
0358 28 03-10-17
035C 28 03-10-17
0350 Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick {kanovickAamall.com)
Nova Group -David Irwin <wooutofit2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redcl!fftr@yahoo.epm)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondett19ws-conmt1.com}
Justin Orgill
/ljf Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
I
H-P~KUMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkg!enwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker. Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-477
Date Cast: 04-06-17
Sheet: 1of2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 145
Ticket No: 309775
Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
9:04am
40°
66°
15 gallons
Time Batched: 8:00 am
Time Arrived: 8:55am
Time Placed: 9:00 am
Sample Point:
Wet Unit Wt: 144.4 pcf
Slump: 5% inches
Air Content: 2.0%
Load Size (Yds):
Yds Delivered:
Yds Ordered:
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 9:14 am
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
10
10
90
Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
119A 7 04-13-17 55,200 4.01 12.63 4370
1198 28 05-04-17
119C 28 05-04-17
119D Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick fkanovicMlgmall.com}
Todd Rainville CfJdcli!ftrl!X1hoo.50m>
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette Cayond!tte@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
H-P~KUMAR 5020 COllnty Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwqqd@kumarusa.com
j
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-477
Date Cast: 04-06-17
Sheet: 2 of 2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 147
Ticket No: 309780
Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
10:45 am
440
68°
14 gallons
Time Batched: 9:22am
Time Arrived: 10:15 am
Time Placed: 10:40 am
Sample Point:
Wet Unit Wt: 145.8 pct
Slump: 5.0 inches
Air Content: 1.6%
Load Size (Yds):
Yds Delivered:
Yds Ordered:
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was infonned of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 10:55 am
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
10
60
90
Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
120A 7 04-13-17 55,500 4.01 12.63 4390
1208 28 05-04-17 l
120C 28 05-04-17
1200 Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kangvlck0gmall.~2f!!)
Todd Rainville 'redclifftr«lytboo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svoodetteflws-coo~rete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
I
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Projed No. 16-7-4n
Date Cast: 04-06-17
Sheet: 1of2
Projed: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 145
Ticket No: 309775
Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
9:04 am
40°
66°
15 gallons
Time Batched: 8:00 am
Time Arrived: 8:55 am
Time Placed: 9:00 am
Sample Point:
Wet Unit Wt: 144.4 pcf
Slump: 51/a inches
Air Content: 2.0%
Load Size (Yds):
Yds Delivered:
Yds Ordered:
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 9:14 am
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
10
10
90
Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: so0n&0
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi} Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2
119A 7 04-13-17 55,200 4.01 12.63 4370
119B 28 05-04-17 78,000 4.01 12.63 6180
119C 28 05-04-17 78,900 4.01 12.63 6250 6190
1190 28 05-04-17 77,700 4.01 12.63 6150
Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
'
" .
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No. 16-7-477
Date Cast: 04-06-17
Sheet: 2 of 2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation
Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 9:22 am Load Size (Yds): 10
Truck No: 147 Time Arrived: 10:15 am Yds Delivered: 60
Ticket No: 309780 Time Placed: 10:40 am Yds Ordered: 90
Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior
Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck Discharge
Time Sampled: 10:45 am Wet Unit Wt: 145.8 pcf
Air Temp: 440 Slump: 5.0 inches
Concrete Temp: 68° Air Content: 1.6 %
Water Added: 14 gallons
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 10:55 am
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. {psi)
120A 7 04-13-17 55,500 4.01 12.63 4390
1208 28 05-04-17 76,100 4.01 12.63 6030
120C 28 05-04-17 76,800 4.01 12.63 6080 6070
120D 28 05-04-17 76,900 4.01 12.63 6090
Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanov!ck@amall.com)
Todd Rainville lredcl!fttrfbaboo.com>
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette f sv2nslette@w!-concrete.c2m)
Justin Orgill
Field Technician
David A. Young, P.E.
Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR
Gt~otechn1ca1 Engineering Eng rreermg Gec:!o;n
t.L:ie~ 1t:1ts Tt:strng ! Envuon1nentwl
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkQlenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Par1<er, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No.
Date Cast:
16-7-477
04-25-17
Sheet: 1of2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Walls
Supplier. Casey Concrete
Truck No: 140
Ticket No: 309983
Mix Design: 3500F
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
12:10 pm
480
63°
None
Time Batched:
Time Arrived:
Time Placed:
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
10:38 am
11:38 am
12:03 am
Sample Point:
145.6 pcf
5.0 inches
1.6 %
Load Size (Yds): 10
Yds Delivered: 10
Yds Ordered: 79
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 12:20 pm
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
169A 7 05-02-17 41,400 4.01 12.63 3280
1698 28 05-23-17
169C 28 05-23-17
1690 Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovlck@gmall.com)
Nova Group ·David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
Thomas J. Westhoff, CET
Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
j
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No.
Date Cast:
Sheet:
16-7-477
04-25-17
2 of2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Walls
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 133
Ticket No: 309989
Mix Design: 3500F
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
1:35 pm
42°
62°
None
Time Batched:
Time Arrived:
Time Placed:
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
12:03 pm
1:00 pm
1:30 pm
Sample Point:
145.6 pcf
51h inches
1.7%
Load Size (Yds): 10
Yds Delivered: 60
Yds Ordered: 79
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 1 :45 pm
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28 Day lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
170A 7 05-02-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600
1708 28 OS..23-17
170C 28 05-23-17
1700 Hold/28
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovick@qmail.com)
Nova Group -David Irwin fsnapoutoflt2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yaboo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
Thomas J. Westhoff, CET
Reviewed By
' '
t
H-P~l<UMAR
Geotechnica! Engineering! Engineer:ng Ceolo~JY
Materials Testing I Enwonrneni<Jl
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No.
Date Cast:
16-7-477
04-25-17
Sheet: 1of2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Walls
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 140
Ticket No: 309983
Mix Design: 3500F
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
12:10 pm
48°
63°
None
Time Batched:
Time Arrived:
Time Placed:
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
10:38 am Load Size (Yds):
11:38 am Yds Delivered:
12:03 am Yds Ordered:
Sample Point: Truck Discharge
145.6 pcf
5.0 inches
1.6%
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 12:20 pm
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
10
10
79
Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi) Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2
169A 7 05-02-17 41,400 4.01 12.63 3280
1698 28 05-23-17 61,600 4.01 12.63 4880
169C 28 05-23-17 60,900 4.01 12.63 4820 4850
169D 28 05-23-17 61,300 4.01 12.63 4850
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com)
Nova Group· David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
Thomas J. Westhoff, CET
Reviewed By
H-P~KUMAR
Geotechn1c2! Engineering ! Engineering Geology
Matenals Testing I Environmentc1i
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkqlenwood@kurnarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
CONCRETE TEST REPORT
Project No.
Date Cast:
Sheet:
16-7-477
04-25-17
2 of2
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail,
Colorado
Placement Location: Upper Walls
Supplier: Casey Concrete
Truck No: 133
Ticket No: 309989
Mix Design: 3500F
Method of Placement: Pump
Time Sampled:
Air Temp:
Concrete Temp:
Water Added:
1:35 pm
42°
62°
None
Time Batched:
Time Arrived:
Time Placed:
Wet Unit Wt:
Slump:
Air Content:
12:03 pm
1:00 pm
1:30 pm
Sample Point:
145.6 pcf
5% inches
1.7%
Load Size (Yds): 10
Yds Delivered: 60
Yds Ordered: 79
Truck Discharge
Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results.
Time Cylinders Cast: 1 :45 pm
Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box
Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68°
Compressive Strength Data
2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi)
Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi)
170A 7 05-02-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600
1708 28 05-23-17 63,600 4.01 12.63 5040
170C 28 05-23-17 64,300 4.01 12.63 5090 5030
170D 28 05-23-17 62,500 4.01 12.63 4950
Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days
Notes:
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com)
Nova Group -David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com)
Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill
Field Technician
Thomas J. Westhoff, CET
Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hokq!enwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Project No.: 16-7-477 Day:
Date:
Page:
Thursday
1/26/17
1 of 1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Area of Inspection: Mat Foundation; Lower Level.
Reference Documents Structural Drawings provided by the contractor.
Used:
Inspection Notes:
Inspection Status: D Preliminary 181 Final
181 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with
the referenced construction documents.
D Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results.
Distribution:
Keith Novick (ynovickflgmall.com)
Nova Group • David liwln (snapoytoflt2flmsn.cqm)
Todd Rainville frtdclifftrCb'aboo.com>
lljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, co 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7968
Fax:(970)945-8454
Email: tigkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Project No.: 16-7-477 Day:
Date:
Page:
Friday
2/10/17
1 of 1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vall, Colorado
Area of Inspection: Lower Level Foundation Walls.
Reference Documents Approved Structural Drawings provided by the contractor.
Used:
Inspection Notes:
Inspection Status: D Preliminary [81 Final
[81 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with
the referenced construction documents.
D Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results.
Distribution:
Keith Novick (kanov!ck@gmall.com)
Todd Rainville fredcl!fftrOyahoo.coml
lljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P .E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: IJ*glemv,oOd@kumarusa.g?m
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Keith Novick Project No.: 16-7-477 Day: Friday
3/31/17 122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Date:
Page: 1 of 1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Area of Inspection: Upper Level Mat Foundation.
Reference Documents Structural Plans Sheet S1.
Used:
Inspection Notes:
Inspection Status: D Preliminary [81 Final
[81 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be In reasonable conformance with
the referenced construction documents.
D Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Joel with DGO Concrete was informed that reinforcement was installed
according to construction documents.
Distribution:
Keith Novick (gnovipk@gmail.com)
Todd Rainville {[!dclifftrayah29.s:om)
/ljf Paul Weiser David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945--7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Project No.: 16-7-4n Day:
Date:
Page:
Tuesday
4/25/17
1 of 1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vall Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Area of Inspection: Upper Level Foundation Walls.
Reference Documents Approved structural drawing provided by the contractor.
Used:
Inspection Notes:
Inspection Status: D Preliminary 181 Final
[8'J Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with
the referenced construction documents.
D Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results.
Distribution:
Keith Novick (l<anov!ck@amail.com)
Todd Rainville frtdcl!fftrfbahoo.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945·7988
Fax: (970) 945.a454
Email: hpkglenwoo<:l@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT
Client: Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Project No.: 16-7-477 Day:
Date:
Page:
Tuesday
4125/17
1 of 1
Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Area of Inspection: Upper Level Foundation Walls.
Reference Documents Approved structural drawing provided by the contractor.
Used:
Inspection Notes:
Inspection Status: D Preliminary lZI Final
181 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be In reasonable conformance with
the referenced construction documents.
D Exceptions Noted:
Verbal
Communication:
Todd Rainville was informed of our Inspection results.
Distribution:
Keith Novick (l<anov!ck@gmail.com)
Todd Rainville fwfcllfftrflyahoo.com)
/ljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P .E.
Field Technician Reviewed By
H-P~KUMAR
Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology
Materials Testing I Environmental
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
January 25, 2017
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
kanovick@gmail.com
Project No. 16-7-477
Subject: Partial Excavation Observation, Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail
Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Dear Keith:
As requested by Todd Rainville, a representative of HP/Kumar observed the partial excavation at
the subject site on January 23, 2017 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The
findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this
report. The services were performed as part of our agreement for professional engineering
services to you dated September 23, 2016.
We previously observed the rough graded excavation for the residence and provided preliminary
foundation design recommendations for spread footings in a report dated October 24, 2016 under
the above project number. The building has now been designed to be supported on a reinforced
mat foundation system using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Only the lower
level portion of the foundation will be constructed at this time. The upper level foundation will
be constructed later.
At the time of our January 23 site visit, the lower level portion of the excavation had been cut at
generally one level up to about 10 feet below the upper level rough graded foundation elevation
(on the south side) and daylighting to the north. The mat foundation was formed, about 8 to 12
inches of minus o/4 inch screened rock had been placed over the subgrade soils and reinforcement
bars for the mat foundation were being placed. The soils exposed in the bottom of the of the
excavation below the screened rock appeared to consist of generally medium dense, clayey silty
sandy gravel with cobbles similar to those previously observed. By probing with a bar, the
natural soils were fim1 in 6 locations. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a disturbed
bulk sample of the natural soils obtained from the bottom of the excavation (minus 1 ~inch
fraction) are provided on Figure 1. No free water was observed in the excavation and the bearing
soils, where observed, were generally moist. By probing with a shovel, groundwater was found
to be flowing in the drain system adjacent the west side of the foundation forms about 2 feet
below the top of mat foundation elevation.
Keith Novick
January 25, 2017
Page2
Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation, at mat foundation bearing on the exposed
soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psf should feasible for foundation
support of the residence. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to
expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade compacted prior to placement of the
screened rock. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be
placed on frozen soils. It should be feasible to provide ground insulation in areas where the
foundation does not have adequate ground cover for frost protection with some risk of frost
heave. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should
also be observed.
We should observe the soils exposed as the upper level excavation to further evaluate the
foundation bearing conditions. Due to the existing older foundation backfill in this area, we
should review the need for subexcavation and replacement of a few feet of the fill (and possibly
soft natural subgrade) soils with minus 3-inch road base.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our limited observation of the soils
exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate
the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. It is possible the data
obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other
biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about
MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
H-P~KUM,AR /,
cc: Nova Group -David Irwin (sqapoutofit2(a;.msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com)
Attaclunents: Figure 1 -Gradation Test Results
Project No. 16-7-477
'I -t
fl z ~ w a::
I-z L&J 0 a:: "" CL.
I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS
Cl.EAR SQUARE OPENlNGS I 24 R. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S STANDARD SERIES I
O 45 ~IN. 15 MIN 60MIN19MIN 4 MIN. 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8 314· 1 1;z 3· 5· s· e· 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
001 002 005 009 019
GRAVEL 38 %
LIQUID LIMIT
90
80
70
60
50
.
40
30
20
10
0
300 600 1 18 2.36 475 95 190 375 762 152 203
12 5 127 074 150 037
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
SAi., I
SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 23 %
% PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF: Clayey Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Bottom of South Central Portion of
Excavation, Lower Level
<.:> z ijj
(/) < a.
I-z LU 0 a:: "" a..
16-7-477 H-P~KUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1
H-P~KUMAR
Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology
Materials Testing I Environmental
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: (970) 945-7988
Fax: (970) 945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado
January 25, 2017
Keith Novick
122 W. Timber Draw
Edwards, Colorado 81632
kanovick@gmail.com
Project No. 16-7-477
Subject: Partial Excavation Observation, Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail
Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado
Dear Keith:
As requested by Todd Rainville, a representative of HP/Kumar observed the partial excavation at
the subject site on January 23, 2017 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The
findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this
report. The services were performed as part of our agreement for professional engineering
services to you dated September 23, 2016.
We previously observed the rough graded excavation for the residence and provided preliminary
foundation design recommendations for spread footings in a report dated October 24, 2016 under
the above project number. The building has now been designed to be supported on a reinforced
mat foundation system using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Only the lower
level portion of the foundation will be constructed at this time. The upper level foundation will
be constructed later.
At the time of our January 23 site visit, the lower level portion of the excavation had been cut at
generally one level up to about 10 feet below the upper level rough graded foundation elevation
(on the south side) and daylighting to the north. The mat foundation was formed, about 8 to 12
inches of minus o/4 inch screened rock had been placed over the subgrade soils and reinforcement
bars for the mat foundation were being placed. The soils exposed in the bottom of the of the
excavation below the screened rock appeared to consist of generally medium dense, clayey silty
sandy gravel with cobbles similar to those previously observed. By probing with a bar, the
natural soils were fim1 in 6 locations. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a disturbed
bulk sample of the natural soils obtained from the bottom of the excavation (minus 1 Yz inch
fraction) are provided on Figure 1. No free water was observed in the excavation and the bearing
soils, where observed, were generally moist. By probing with a shovel, groundwater was found
to be flowing in the drain system adjacent the west side of the foundation forms about 2 feet
below the top of mat foundation elevation.
Keith Novick
January 25, 2017
Page2
Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation, at mat foundation bearing on the exposed
soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf should feasible for foundation
support of the residence. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to
expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade compacted prior to placement of the
screened rock. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be
placed on frozen soils. It should be feasible to provide ground insulation in areas where the
foundation does not have adequate ground cover for frost protection with some risk of frost
heave. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should
also be observed.
We should observe the soils exposed as the upper level excavation to further evaluate the
foundation bearing conditions. Due to the existing older foundation backfill in this area, we
should review the need for subexcavation and replacement of a few feet of the fill (and possibly
soft natural subgrade) soils with minus 3-inch road base.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our limited observation of the soils
exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate
the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. It is possible the data
obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other
biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about
MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
cc: Nova Group -David Irwin (snaooutoflt2ra1msn.com)
Todd Rainville (redcliffir@yahoo.com)
Attaclunents: Figure 1 -Gradation Test Results
H-P~KUMAR Project No 16.7-477
8 z ~ w 0:::
I-z l.&J (,) a:: I.LI ll..
I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS
CLEAR SQUARE OPEN:NGS
24 . 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES j
O 45 ~~. 15 MIN 60MIN19MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 318 314· 1112· 3· 5·5· a· 100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
001 002 005 009 019
1.1 Ar l1..J:~<;_l
GRAVEL 38 %
LIQUID LIMIT
90
80
70
60
-so
40
30
20
10
0
300 600 1 18 2 36 475 95 190 375 762 152 203 12 5 127 074 150 037
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS
SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 23 %
% PLASTICITY INDEX %
SAMPLE OF: Clayey Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Bottom of South Central Portion of
Excavation, Lower Level
<.!> z in (/) < 11..
I-z w u a::: l&J ll..
16-7-477 H-P~KUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1