Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Inspection reports.pdfFINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Project: __ S_F_R_17_4_0_S_ie_r_ra_T_ra_i_I _______ _ Permit Number: BP 16-0243 Project Location: __ 17_4_o_s_ie_rr_a_T_r_a_i1,_v_a_i_I, _c_o_8_1_6_5_7 _____________ _ owner 17 40 Sierra Trail , LLC 122 West Timber Draw v ·1 81657 Address --------------City: _a_1 ____ Zip: _____ _ Design Professional In Charge: ____ M_a_t_t_W_a_d_e_..;.y ________________ _ Address: PO Box 97 City: Edwards State: CO Zip: 81632 Phone: (970) 926-3373 Fax:-----------E-mail: Wadey@alpinecivil.com To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief, the special inspections and/or testing required for this project, have been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for, and are to be considered an integral part of this final report. Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports have been corrected. Prepared by: /o-Jc:;-fJ Date Preparer's Seal and Signature Required the perimeter drainage system designed by Alpine Engineering in connection with FINAL REPORT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Project: SFR 17 40 Sierra Trail Permit Number: BP 16-0243 Project Location: __ 1_7_4_o_s_i_e_rr_a_T_ra_i_I, _v_a_il,_c_o_8_1_6_5_7 _____________ _ Owner 17 40 Sierra Trail , LLC Address 122 West Timber Draw City: Vail Zip: _8_1_65_7 __ _ Design Professional In Charge: __ D_a_ve_Y_o_un_g_,_H_P_K_um_a_r ------------- Address: __ 5_0_20_C_o_u_nty~R_o_a_d _____________________ _ City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip: 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 E-mail: dyoung@kumarusa.com To the best of my information, knowledge, and belief, the special inspections and/or testing required for this project, have been completed in accordance with the contract documents. Interim reports submitted prior to this Final Report of Special Inspections form a basis for, and are to be considered an integral part of this final report. Any discrepancies that were noted in all interim reports have ~en corrected. L .. f. fflr f;,'1ur1.dah'ori 'elt9:l~ l;;)CC,rt~jr Ct>rlCJe-c. reM Porc,,emt,t.-tf ~ ~ovtcre.,f.e t1 (o tcrfl'e5 tl-vLd $f1e.vij-b'h ()11 /y. Prepared by: ~l).v1d 4 .. iUv12 ~~ Date Preparer's Seal and Signature Required H-P~KUMAR -0 i{'J, 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 94S.7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-477 Date Cast: 01-30-17 Sheet: 1of1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Mat Foundation; Lower Level Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 8:11 am Load Size (Yds): Truck No: 134 Time Arrived: 9:15 am Yds Delivered: Ticket No: 309390 Time Placed: 9:30am Yds Ordered: Mix Design: 3500 psi % Exterior with 1% non-chloride accelerator Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 9:35 am 24° 68° None Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: Sample Point: 141.6 pcf 4% inches 4.5% Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was infonned of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 9:45 am 10 20 70 Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box in Heated Tent Date in Lab: 01-31-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 53° Min/Max: 49°n1° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 026A 7 02-06-17 50,700 4.01 12.63 4010 0268 28 02-27-17 026C 28 02-27-17 026D Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com) Nova Group • David Irwin (snaooutofit2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (recfclifftr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) Justin Orgill njf Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945.a454 Email: hQkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-477 Date Cast: 01-30-17 Sheet: 1of1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Mat Foundation; Lower Level Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 8:11 am Load Size (Yds): Truck No: 134 Time Arrived: 9:15 am Yds Delivered: Ticket No: 309390 Time Placed: 9:30am Yds Ordered: Mix Design: 3500 psi 3/4 Exterior with 1 % non-chloride accelerator Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 9:35 am 24° 68° None Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: Sample Point: 141.6 pcf 4Yz inches 4.5% Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 9:45 am 10 20 70 Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box in Heated Tent Date in Lab: 01-31-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 53° Min/Max: 49°n1° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi) Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 026A 7 02-06-17 50,700 4.01 12.63 4010 0268 28 02-27-17 66,200 4.01 12.63 5240 026C 28 02-27-17 66,700 4.01 12.63 5280 5250 0260 28 02-27-17 65,900 4.01 12.63 5220 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick <!sanovk;k@gmall.com> Nova Group -David Irwin fsnaQC?ytoQU@m!n.com) Todd Rainville (radcllmr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) Justin Orgill /ljf Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By H-P~t<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkgleowood@kumarusa.com I I ' '- Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-4n Date Cast: 02-10-17 Sheet: 1of1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Lower Level Foundation Walls Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 11:21 am Load Size (Yds): 10 Truck No: 133 Time Arrived: 12:14 pm Yds Delivered: 10 Ticket No: 309456 Time Placed: 12:30 pm Yds Ordered: 40 Mix Design: 3500 Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck Discharge Time Sampled: 12:40 pm Wet Unit Wt: 141.6 pct Air Temp: 50° Slump: 4.0 inches Concrete Temp: 65° Air Content: 7.0% Water Added: None Communication: The contractor and supplier were informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 12:50 pm Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated cure box in heated tent Date in Lab: 02-13-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 47° Min/Max: 47°/86° Compressive Strength Data 2017 I Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days I lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 035A 7 02-17-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600 0358 28 03-10-17 035C 28 03-10-17 0350 Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick {kanovickAamall.com) Nova Group -David Irwin <wooutofit2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (redcl!fftr@yahoo.epm) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondett19ws-conmt1.com} Justin Orgill /ljf Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By I H-P~KUMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkg!enwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker. Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-477 Date Cast: 04-06-17 Sheet: 1of2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 145 Ticket No: 309775 Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 9:04am 40° 66° 15 gallons Time Batched: 8:00 am Time Arrived: 8:55am Time Placed: 9:00 am Sample Point: Wet Unit Wt: 144.4 pcf Slump: 5% inches Air Content: 2.0% Load Size (Yds): Yds Delivered: Yds Ordered: Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 9:14 am Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box 10 10 90 Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 119A 7 04-13-17 55,200 4.01 12.63 4370 1198 28 05-04-17 119C 28 05-04-17 119D Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick fkanovicMlgmall.com} Todd Rainville CfJdcli!ftrl!X1hoo.50m> Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette Cayond!tte@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By H-P~KUMAR 5020 COllnty Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwqqd@kumarusa.com j Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-477 Date Cast: 04-06-17 Sheet: 2 of 2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 147 Ticket No: 309780 Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 10:45 am 440 68° 14 gallons Time Batched: 9:22am Time Arrived: 10:15 am Time Placed: 10:40 am Sample Point: Wet Unit Wt: 145.8 pct Slump: 5.0 inches Air Content: 1.6% Load Size (Yds): Yds Delivered: Yds Ordered: Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was infonned of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 10:55 am Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box 10 60 90 Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 120A 7 04-13-17 55,500 4.01 12.63 4390 1208 28 05-04-17 l 120C 28 05-04-17 1200 Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kangvlck0gmall.~2f!!) Todd Rainville 'redclifftr«lytboo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svoodetteflws-coo~rete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By I H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Projed No. 16-7-4n Date Cast: 04-06-17 Sheet: 1of2 Projed: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 145 Ticket No: 309775 Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 9:04 am 40° 66° 15 gallons Time Batched: 8:00 am Time Arrived: 8:55 am Time Placed: 9:00 am Sample Point: Wet Unit Wt: 144.4 pcf Slump: 51/a inches Air Content: 2.0% Load Size (Yds): Yds Delivered: Yds Ordered: Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 9:14 am Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box 10 10 90 Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: so0n&0 Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi} Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 119A 7 04-13-17 55,200 4.01 12.63 4370 119B 28 05-04-17 78,000 4.01 12.63 6180 119C 28 05-04-17 78,900 4.01 12.63 6250 6190 1190 28 05-04-17 77,700 4.01 12.63 6150 Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By ' " . H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. 16-7-477 Date Cast: 04-06-17 Sheet: 2 of 2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Level Mat Foundation Supplier: Casey Concrete Time Batched: 9:22 am Load Size (Yds): 10 Truck No: 147 Time Arrived: 10:15 am Yds Delivered: 60 Ticket No: 309780 Time Placed: 10:40 am Yds Ordered: 90 Mix Design: 4000 psi Interior Method of Placement: Pump Sample Point: Truck Discharge Time Sampled: 10:45 am Wet Unit Wt: 145.8 pcf Air Temp: 440 Slump: 5.0 inches Concrete Temp: 68° Air Content: 1.6 % Water Added: 14 gallons Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 10:55 am Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box Date in Lab: 04-07-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/76° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. {psi) 120A 7 04-13-17 55,500 4.01 12.63 4390 1208 28 05-04-17 76,100 4.01 12.63 6030 120C 28 05-04-17 76,800 4.01 12.63 6080 6070 120D 28 05-04-17 76,900 4.01 12.63 6090 Specified Strength for Structure: 4500 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 4000 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanov!ck@amall.com) Todd Rainville lredcl!fttrfbaboo.com> Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette f sv2nslette@w!-concrete.c2m) Justin Orgill Field Technician David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR Gt~otechn1ca1 Engineering Eng rreermg Gec:!o;n t.L:ie~ 1t:1ts Tt:strng ! Envuon1nentwl 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkQlenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Par1<er, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. Date Cast: 16-7-477 04-25-17 Sheet: 1of2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Walls Supplier. Casey Concrete Truck No: 140 Ticket No: 309983 Mix Design: 3500F Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 12:10 pm 480 63° None Time Batched: Time Arrived: Time Placed: Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: 10:38 am 11:38 am 12:03 am Sample Point: 145.6 pcf 5.0 inches 1.6 % Load Size (Yds): 10 Yds Delivered: 10 Yds Ordered: 79 Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 12:20 pm Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 169A 7 05-02-17 41,400 4.01 12.63 3280 1698 28 05-23-17 169C 28 05-23-17 1690 Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovlck@gmall.com) Nova Group ·David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com j Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. Date Cast: Sheet: 16-7-477 04-25-17 2 of2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Walls Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 133 Ticket No: 309989 Mix Design: 3500F Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 1:35 pm 42° 62° None Time Batched: Time Arrived: Time Placed: Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: 12:03 pm 1:00 pm 1:30 pm Sample Point: 145.6 pcf 51h inches 1.7% Load Size (Yds): 10 Yds Delivered: 60 Yds Ordered: 79 Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 1 :45 pm Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28 Day lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 170A 7 05-02-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600 1708 28 OS..23-17 170C 28 05-23-17 1700 Hold/28 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovick@qmail.com) Nova Group -David Irwin fsnapoutoflt2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yaboo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Reviewed By ' ' t H-P~l<UMAR Geotechnica! Engineering! Engineer:ng Ceolo~JY Materials Testing I Enwonrneni<Jl 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. Date Cast: 16-7-477 04-25-17 Sheet: 1of2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Walls Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 140 Ticket No: 309983 Mix Design: 3500F Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 12:10 pm 48° 63° None Time Batched: Time Arrived: Time Placed: Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: 10:38 am Load Size (Yds): 11:38 am Yds Delivered: 12:03 am Yds Ordered: Sample Point: Truck Discharge 145.6 pcf 5.0 inches 1.6% Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 12:20 pm Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box 10 10 79 Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Load Diameter Area Date Strength (psi) Avg. (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 169A 7 05-02-17 41,400 4.01 12.63 3280 1698 28 05-23-17 61,600 4.01 12.63 4880 169C 28 05-23-17 60,900 4.01 12.63 4820 4850 169D 28 05-23-17 61,300 4.01 12.63 4850 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com) Nova Group· David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Reviewed By H-P~KUMAR Geotechn1c2! Engineering ! Engineering Geology Matenals Testing I Environmentc1i 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkqlenwood@kurnarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 CONCRETE TEST REPORT Project No. Date Cast: Sheet: 16-7-477 04-25-17 2 of2 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 17 40 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Placement Location: Upper Walls Supplier: Casey Concrete Truck No: 133 Ticket No: 309989 Mix Design: 3500F Method of Placement: Pump Time Sampled: Air Temp: Concrete Temp: Water Added: 1:35 pm 42° 62° None Time Batched: Time Arrived: Time Placed: Wet Unit Wt: Slump: Air Content: 12:03 pm 1:00 pm 1:30 pm Sample Point: 145.6 pcf 5% inches 1.7% Load Size (Yds): 10 Yds Delivered: 60 Yds Ordered: 79 Truck Discharge Communication: The supplier was informed of our field test results. Time Cylinders Cast: 1 :45 pm Initial Cure Time on Site: 1 day Field Storage: Insulated Cure Box Date in Lab: 04-26-17 Cylinder Temperature at Pick Up: 50° Min/Max: 50°/68° Compressive Strength Data 2017 Compressive 28 Day Lab Age Date Load Diameter Area Strength (psi) Number Days lbs. in. in2 Avg. (psi) 170A 7 05-02-17 45,500 4.01 12.63 3600 1708 28 05-23-17 63,600 4.01 12.63 5040 170C 28 05-23-17 64,300 4.01 12.63 5090 5030 170D 28 05-23-17 62,500 4.01 12.63 4950 Specified Strength for Structure: 3000 psi at 28 days Specified Strength for Mix: 3500 psi at 28 days Notes: Distribution: Keith Novick (kanovick@gmail.com) Nova Group -David Irwin (snapoutofit2@msn.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com) Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette (svondette@ws-concrete.com) /ljf Justin Orgill Field Technician Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hokq!enwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Client: Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project No.: 16-7-477 Day: Date: Page: Thursday 1/26/17 1 of 1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Area of Inspection: Mat Foundation; Lower Level. Reference Documents Structural Drawings provided by the contractor. Used: Inspection Notes: Inspection Status: D Preliminary 181 Final 181 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. D Exceptions Noted: Verbal Communication: Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results. Distribution: Keith Novick (ynovickflgmall.com) Nova Group • David liwln (snapoytoflt2flmsn.cqm) Todd Rainville frtdclifftrCb'aboo.com> lljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, co 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7968 Fax:(970)945-8454 Email: tigkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Client: Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project No.: 16-7-477 Day: Date: Page: Friday 2/10/17 1 of 1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vall, Colorado Area of Inspection: Lower Level Foundation Walls. Reference Documents Approved Structural Drawings provided by the contractor. Used: Inspection Notes: Inspection Status: D Preliminary [81 Final [81 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. D Exceptions Noted: Verbal Communication: Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results. Distribution: Keith Novick (kanov!ck@gmall.com) Todd Rainville fredcl!fftrOyahoo.coml lljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P .E. Field Technician Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: IJ*glemv,oOd@kumarusa.g?m Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Client: Keith Novick Project No.: 16-7-477 Day: Friday 3/31/17 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 Date: Page: 1 of 1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Area of Inspection: Upper Level Mat Foundation. Reference Documents Structural Plans Sheet S1. Used: Inspection Notes: Inspection Status: D Preliminary [81 Final [81 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be In reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. D Exceptions Noted: Verbal Communication: Joel with DGO Concrete was informed that reinforcement was installed according to construction documents. Distribution: Keith Novick (gnovipk@gmail.com) Todd Rainville {[!dclifftrayah29.s:om) /ljf Paul Weiser David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945--7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Client: Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project No.: 16-7-4n Day: Date: Page: Tuesday 4/25/17 1 of 1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vall Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Area of Inspection: Upper Level Foundation Walls. Reference Documents Approved structural drawing provided by the contractor. Used: Inspection Notes: Inspection Status: D Preliminary 181 Final [8'J Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be in reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. D Exceptions Noted: Verbal Communication: Todd Rainville was informed of our inspection results. Distribution: Keith Novick (l<anov!ck@amail.com) Todd Rainville frtdcl!fftrfbahoo.com) /ljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By H-P~l<UMAR 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945·7988 Fax: (970) 945.a454 Email: hpkglenwoo<:l@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado REINFORCEMENT STEEL INSPECTION REPORT Client: Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 Project No.: 16-7-477 Day: Date: Page: Tuesday 4125/17 1 of 1 Project: Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Area of Inspection: Upper Level Foundation Walls. Reference Documents Approved structural drawing provided by the contractor. Used: Inspection Notes: Inspection Status: D Preliminary lZI Final 181 Concrete reinforcement as noted above was judged to be In reasonable conformance with the referenced construction documents. D Exceptions Noted: Verbal Communication: Todd Rainville was informed of our Inspection results. Distribution: Keith Novick (l<anov!ck@gmail.com) Todd Rainville fwfcllfftrflyahoo.com) /ljf Justin Orgill David A. Young, P .E. Field Technician Reviewed By H-P~KUMAR Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology Materials Testing I Environmental 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado January 25, 2017 Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 kanovick@gmail.com Project No. 16-7-477 Subject: Partial Excavation Observation, Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Dear Keith: As requested by Todd Rainville, a representative of HP/Kumar observed the partial excavation at the subject site on January 23, 2017 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed as part of our agreement for professional engineering services to you dated September 23, 2016. We previously observed the rough graded excavation for the residence and provided preliminary foundation design recommendations for spread footings in a report dated October 24, 2016 under the above project number. The building has now been designed to be supported on a reinforced mat foundation system using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Only the lower level portion of the foundation will be constructed at this time. The upper level foundation will be constructed later. At the time of our January 23 site visit, the lower level portion of the excavation had been cut at generally one level up to about 10 feet below the upper level rough graded foundation elevation (on the south side) and daylighting to the north. The mat foundation was formed, about 8 to 12 inches of minus o/4 inch screened rock had been placed over the subgrade soils and reinforcement bars for the mat foundation were being placed. The soils exposed in the bottom of the of the excavation below the screened rock appeared to consist of generally medium dense, clayey silty sandy gravel with cobbles similar to those previously observed. By probing with a bar, the natural soils were fim1 in 6 locations. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a disturbed bulk sample of the natural soils obtained from the bottom of the excavation (minus 1 ~inch fraction) are provided on Figure 1. No free water was observed in the excavation and the bearing soils, where observed, were generally moist. By probing with a shovel, groundwater was found to be flowing in the drain system adjacent the west side of the foundation forms about 2 feet below the top of mat foundation elevation. Keith Novick January 25, 2017 Page2 Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation, at mat foundation bearing on the exposed soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psf should feasible for foundation support of the residence. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade compacted prior to placement of the screened rock. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. It should be feasible to provide ground insulation in areas where the foundation does not have adequate ground cover for frost protection with some risk of frost heave. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. We should observe the soils exposed as the upper level excavation to further evaluate the foundation bearing conditions. Due to the existing older foundation backfill in this area, we should review the need for subexcavation and replacement of a few feet of the fill (and possibly soft natural subgrade) soils with minus 3-inch road base. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our limited observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, H-P~KUM,AR /, cc: Nova Group -David Irwin (sqapoutofit2(a;.msn.com) Todd Rainville (redclifftr@yahoo.com) Attaclunents: Figure 1 -Gradation Test Results Project No. 16-7-477 'I -t fl z ~ w a:: I-z L&J 0 a:: "" CL. I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS Cl.EAR SQUARE OPENlNGS I 24 R. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S STANDARD SERIES I O 45 ~IN. 15 MIN 60MIN19MIN 4 MIN. 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8 314· 1 1;z 3· 5· s· e· 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 001 002 005 009 019 GRAVEL 38 % LIQUID LIMIT 90 80 70 60 50 . 40 30 20 10 0 300 600 1 18 2.36 475 95 190 375 762 152 203 12 5 127 074 150 037 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS SAi., I SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 23 % % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Clayey Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Bottom of South Central Portion of Excavation, Lower Level <.:> z ijj (/) < a. I-z LU 0 a:: "" a.. 16-7-477 H-P~KUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1 H-P~KUMAR Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology Materials Testing I Environmental 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 945-7988 Fax: (970) 945-8454 Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs, and Silverthorne, Colorado January 25, 2017 Keith Novick 122 W. Timber Draw Edwards, Colorado 81632 kanovick@gmail.com Project No. 16-7-477 Subject: Partial Excavation Observation, Proposed Residence, Lot 22, Filing 1, Vail Village West, 1740 Sierra Trail, Vail, Colorado Dear Keith: As requested by Todd Rainville, a representative of HP/Kumar observed the partial excavation at the subject site on January 23, 2017 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The services were performed as part of our agreement for professional engineering services to you dated September 23, 2016. We previously observed the rough graded excavation for the residence and provided preliminary foundation design recommendations for spread footings in a report dated October 24, 2016 under the above project number. The building has now been designed to be supported on a reinforced mat foundation system using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Only the lower level portion of the foundation will be constructed at this time. The upper level foundation will be constructed later. At the time of our January 23 site visit, the lower level portion of the excavation had been cut at generally one level up to about 10 feet below the upper level rough graded foundation elevation (on the south side) and daylighting to the north. The mat foundation was formed, about 8 to 12 inches of minus o/4 inch screened rock had been placed over the subgrade soils and reinforcement bars for the mat foundation were being placed. The soils exposed in the bottom of the of the excavation below the screened rock appeared to consist of generally medium dense, clayey silty sandy gravel with cobbles similar to those previously observed. By probing with a bar, the natural soils were fim1 in 6 locations. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a disturbed bulk sample of the natural soils obtained from the bottom of the excavation (minus 1 Yz inch fraction) are provided on Figure 1. No free water was observed in the excavation and the bearing soils, where observed, were generally moist. By probing with a shovel, groundwater was found to be flowing in the drain system adjacent the west side of the foundation forms about 2 feet below the top of mat foundation elevation. Keith Novick January 25, 2017 Page2 Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation, at mat foundation bearing on the exposed soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf should feasible for foundation support of the residence. Loose and disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils and the subgrade compacted prior to placement of the screened rock. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. It should be feasible to provide ground insulation in areas where the foundation does not have adequate ground cover for frost protection with some risk of frost heave. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. We should observe the soils exposed as the upper level excavation to further evaluate the foundation bearing conditions. Due to the existing older foundation backfill in this area, we should review the need for subexcavation and replacement of a few feet of the fill (and possibly soft natural subgrade) soils with minus 3-inch road base. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our limited observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, cc: Nova Group -David Irwin (snaooutoflt2ra1msn.com) Todd Rainville (redcliffir@yahoo.com) Attaclunents: Figure 1 -Gradation Test Results H-P~KUMAR Project No 16.7-477 8 z ~ w 0::: I-z l.&J (,) a:: I.LI ll.. I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS CLEAR SQUARE OPEN:NGS 24 . 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES j O 45 ~~. 15 MIN 60MIN19MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 318 314· 1112· 3· 5·5· a· 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 001 002 005 009 019 1.1 Ar l1..J:~<;_l GRAVEL 38 % LIQUID LIMIT 90 80 70 60 -so 40 30 20 10 0 300 600 1 18 2 36 475 95 190 375 762 152 203 12 5 127 074 150 037 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 23 % % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Clayey Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Bottom of South Central Portion of Excavation, Lower Level <.!> z in (/) < 11.. I-z w u a::: l&J ll.. 16-7-477 H-P~KUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1