Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC31.pdf - - - w NOTES: w - _ 07 N 1 . ALL SITE GRADING [EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, AND COMPACTION] SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LATEST GEOTECHNICAL LIJ 0INVESTIGATION FOR THIS PROPERTY AND SHALL FURTHER BE IN CONFORMANCE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND ADJUST _ _ _ _ - - - _ _- _ _=1 -- -- T _- _ - _ _ _ _ CURB AND GUTTER ELEVATION TO - z WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL'S "STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN T - - - - - T T T - - T- - - - - PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO - - LLJ AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS," LATEST EDITION. T - - - - - T- - - - - - T- - - T - - - BASIS OF ELEVATION - - - -G- - - - - _ _ - T- GUTTER FLOWLINE FROM STREET I W - - T _ - - - -C- - T - - - 2. THE GRADING DESIGN SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE - - - __= __ 5 - - - CROSS SLOPE. (TYPICAL) - T- - - - - - I- (n T - - - SEWER MANHOLE 23 _ _ - - -G- - - - - - _ ' - - - - �`- - - T- - - --T - - - T - T - - T- - T- - WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FHA AND HUD CRITERIA AND TO THE GREATEST _ - T INVFR- f-V 8190.0 - - - - - - - - - - -G- - - - _ _ - - - EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT - - - _ - - -GRAS R/M ELEV = 8203.6 - - - - - _ Q - -C_ - - - - _ - -G- - - - - VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - - - - �- - - - - I �- - - - 70" IP WATER MA/A RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. VARIOUS CONFLICTING DESIGN CRITERIA - - �_ - - - - - - - - -� - - - - 10" DIP WATER MAIN -G- - - -- MAKE TOTAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S (50' ROW) 0 5 - -G- - - -- - - - - _ _ - - - - 1 - - - _ -G- - - _ - RECOMMENDATIONS DIFFICULT [ADA, SITE PLAN LAYOUT, ETC.]. THUS, THESE - -_ - - - - - h 6 STAIR RISERS W/ I _ _ - ' PLANS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW _ - - - - - RE: LANDSCAPE PVC SEWER MAIN EQUAL RISER FLUSH CURB - AND COMMENT RELATIVE TO COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. IF FOR SIGN LOCATION - - SS- - - (- HEIGHT. INCLUDE ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE _ _ _ - - - 1� WALL AT EHU (RE: THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER DETERMINES THE DESIGN MAY COMPROMISE THE AND WALL SECTION - - SS- - - HANDRAIL SEE NOTE 12 - - RIM TO PROPOSED GRADE I ARCH. AND LS.) ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE OF THE STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS, UPON _ - - - - - - SS- o EX. R/M=8205.05 LANDSCAPE WALL 7 STAIR RISERS W/ _ - - _ �- RECEIPT OF THE WRITTEN COMMENTS FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, 4' CONCRETE PAN - - SS- - _o_ r - - - - - _ __- - - I 2' MAX COMMENTS WILL BE DISCUSSED AND RESOLVED WITH THE OWNER AND THE EQUAL RISER FLUSH - %S - - I (RE: LAND.) _ U _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -N - - - - - SS - - HEIGHT. INCLUDE I ~ CURB GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A MANNER AS DIRECTED _ - - J- - - _ _ -( N - - - - -- "' ``�"' �a8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SSo HANDRAIL SEE NOTE 12 I MODIFIED 4' I - - -SS_ _ - BY THE OWNER. n - - _ -D _ G LANDSCAPE WALL - - - - - - - ==S-S- _- - - I CONC. PAN 4.61± I �_- - - - - STORM GRATE _ _ - - - f , _ .Tec �e 2' MAX - - - -- - w _ - - - - N -I - - - - - - �2 IF THE OWNER ELECTS TO UTILIZE FOUNDATION SYSTEMS AND/OR PAVEMENT L - - - - - Cr) , - , 33> -� - E-LL N-� -E- - - - - - a RE: LS. -4.64 ow - -SS- - -� L` r S gc , - _E_ DESIGNS THAT REQUIRE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR CONTROL OF SUBGRADE U� - - a � :� - -,k,_-- E - ° 6.8% ° 4.53 - _ 0.9% I 4.44 _ 1.0% _. _ _ , , 0.3q°/ a a �• o b,� -E- - 4.50 - -V_-- - s MOISTURE, SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY DESIGN PARAMETERS - _� / a- - -:• :•: �� 04 -5• \ i3 Al�- -E�_h <° -E- - - - BOW ° 4.65 a a - FL_ _ �..'.:;:�� - -E- •6, - ' - ,■ -�\�0 FG ',-3> ,A v4 (' � - -E'- E___-- - - - 6.58 K' FG �- ■ - 7S-- a ' :■ SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IN CONCERT �-=- \'� - o o� `` m l ,�-E- -�- - -E- _ -E - - TOW 7.87 00 F - E - TBG o a a v 4 48_ ---4.73 •'.� = 4.73' - - _ - 7-2% WITH THE FOUNDATION PAVEMENT DESIGN. IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT VARIOUS - - bel BOW� h ° �iy= 4.36 FG ao ,7.4q° r^ _ b� 2 _ FG_E v0 FG F� - FOUNDATION SYSTEMS REQUIRE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SUBGRADE PREPARATION, 3% / _ - - _ _ _ _ • ___-�� ® F� _\_ o ,/fi.'� _� �_N__�,_'• _ e 1 -b, - - 5.00 _ :1.4% ,AFL E- ��� >s A - - - - DRAINAGE DESIGNS, AND/OR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE CRITERIA THAT ARE BEYOND E - W� �z ® 6 O� _-- '-.---- - __b 6 / BOW o - \ -E- - - - 14.33- Nowa, TAPER TO 6 - R 8 i� 0 3% _ • / \ ® FL jam, ,- o�y�6, - -® � - -� 2a - ,,---__��� '`�•L •= ; c,i FG o' CURB HEIGHT 4.64 _ - /`,G, 6yA'c � - - - - - ��17 THE PURVIEW AND RESPONSIBILITY OF MARTIN/MARTIN, AND THE GRADING PLANS -- o- =j��f�, ;' 6• mow. 41,, �� 1� 4.38E � 3 72 ,�- / 6 9 ' ]O .,� ����',y 6�0 / �a -CU_R,13 - -4.32 d� _ 8.66 1, SHOWN HEREON. THE INCORPORATION AND EXECUTION OF THESE SPECIAL �� � �jJ��.:, �11� 's S - - - - - - - -�� 7 ..q N -FL„_� o J _ - - & TOW PRECAUTIONS SHALL OCCUR IN CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL !,, � � 6�1� 0. N \ N �/�. S III �- �f, o � / N �� c - -� 4,26- TAPER TO 6 - - 4.9/ - �q l ' ENGINEER'S DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS. - � '- . i_v =fie `W/P�/ � '• a�� - - - - 9.56 I ��• 9 - - 6 y' ' I �i:L 1� s�_=�� �- _�! r \ - `��!' TOW M I' P �� 2 \eo s FL ` CURB HEIGHT \ FG_ �d, 'i, _1 Lin 'PLO‘--,----4„„„„�� ! i�_ 4��� Q Q�` �'� - Mail��� `��� - - °� 5 S -��_ �� a - I °' -A- - - a 4.53 __I. �' _ � ` �� - - F �i N ' 9.5% ��� �� �' s -_ r:��- ^�' __ _ _ _-_•� 3. GRADING SHOWN HEREON IS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS PROPER DRAINAGE- i - - - ,'�� •,9 / -�r�C�.�`, .0.-J7w�1'�� ��, 1 '�- ►� 0 8 J ��.�.. •s a v FG _ __ ►�-_..� Z - - �N -J 0 o �� �� ,� ��. •_ ��� �_�� i► A . , -- _ CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE STRUCTURES AND 0 co /� % = - N��� - - /^ - fseAt(0%.1%., b,.° ho F� a IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROJECT. THE COORDINATION OF THIS DESIGN AND i / i -- i - / -- - - �O-drbrER FE tf�llL'- -k *. . 4 G �O /\' / 0,0 ��- �� 5.0% j �� T 2.7% -n 1.0% c� �� 5.0% = �� %� /� - - - - TO�REM#ll wj •�1�� �'�1 N o r r ,� 'Q6 r w r • r .� - COMPLIANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION WITH THE .'ax. . t� i� / - - - N. �, \ / 7.89 �o o M' \ CP i`l' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN, IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER = = � � i % / - - - - � �/ �-- � \ �i>, 4 P F\- i �- TOP OF FG n' CO V I _ / / Ix - - - - - - - - - - - / � �i p p WALL I AND OR DEVELOPER. MARTIN MARTIN HIGHLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE/- - � \ \ t1�� /i•• �b rn N , 4 . o WALL ELEV. o (RE: v WALL AT EHU (RE: I cA cA / / .=3 E a, \ N \ f *11 `4, ` co o QN _ N I \ N WALL (RE: N LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH a , / / / - - - _ / / - \ �i�►�.�, �,. w 18" ABOVE N N ARCH) N N ARCH. AND LS.) / / / / / / ,•/, /i, �' c� - 1 w ARCH) RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. `, / / / / / / � ��„mn% - - \ v �•.�i i-�•��i, _ F O W L N E �� = / / / I` _ - - / / \ \ \ �•��'•� s�i1�/i, - / L R E: I LS o _ � 1 _ 4. EXISTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN DEPICTED FROM \'�e.��., .,�j�,��s��E � �� _,5_ q, I/ - ST BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE SHOWN TO THE EXTENT KNOWN. IT IS cri- // / / / / / / 7 ��!I(/ - - - - \ \ 4w' \ `Ps,+e. „ lc_f_,E,sf�,i_E.fib i-so:N:All rn I ROOF OUTL NE I THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING GRADE oL iiiir 11'1/// 1-c •: =E•s i o i 5.0% - ,/ / / / // / / , / / \ \ \ _ ���5� �e ►��E���_�€�� a��- �f� =�i � N\� / N CONDITIONS AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND AT LOCATIONS THAT/ / / / / / - _ _ \ e.�ie, i, y, eara��se`�='�s'�iN ��i:' 6/ / / / 7 - - 7 \ ,,i \ _ _ - - 'i::--1"'�'- =3•-� =off fig!C' ,_, \--,3 o 10� / 7 STAIR RISERS W/ INTERFACE WITH EXISTING OR PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER / / / / / / / / / / \ \ ` � wg, - ,mly, ►�"'"'-"-0lgsgm gs; 'l i,.� \'`".4\- O.pl w EQUAL RISER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT CONTRADICT THE ENGINEERS INTENT FOR / / / / / / / � ' / - \ - �� - L - - - - 63 '� ''!si'� g \` HEIGHT. INCLUDE11111F r \1 DRAINAGE PATTERNS, MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM SLOPES, AND PROPOSED / ilm . - - - /�! '0�, / / - - �REELINE / - - - - \ - - �iI1� - - - - 1i� ��;�' �'�'��\ �9 I 0 HANDRAIL SEE NOTE 12 r ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE ENGINEER WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR _ _ :� 1�� oo v / / / / / , - - - - _ - - ad - � N. ��i`�1 p i ��'o\� 1F r T 11( I o ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES TO THE DESIGN WITHOUT PROPER / / / / i I / - - \1� .��� ��° 56 o I 1 ,I - - - NOTIFICATION. i -- , / / A &o u'VO. ,, � 1 0' _ o r -JSt \ �P,,i♦ \ �i \ / i // I / \00•••\ 4.4,\``., �^mem __ - - - 5.0% ___ -_ _ �,��& -5.0% _ _ 5. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN HEREIN ARE DEFINED / \ // ♦.♦ •,'� ..�-:: I. :..��� W � AS FINISHED ELEVATION AFTER PAVING, LANDSCAPING, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL / I \ K YSTONE RETAINING /`o� ` ;7s OIN ��- ��ktill i COORDINATE WITH GEOTECH FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESS AND LANDSCAPE FOR / \ \ WL TO REMAIN (TYP)� i(b. `e�.,: © � � _ - THICKNESS OF TOPSOIL, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. / \ \ N \ �.,!4,c. \ 16.95 uP �� ■_ ���-----.•' _ _ �- / I -.....41 m- - =•,---- ---,--,_ •ma �����O-ISI■ : I -����� 6. ALL SPOTS ARE TO FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FG = FINISHED / \ \ (10 N••.4..: 7>OW- �M �� II--/j//-- ---- � ����'■I r \ \ GRADE, FF = FINISH FLOOR, TOF = TOP OF FOUNDATION, HP = HIGH POINT, WOOD FENCE \ \ N ��'' t9 "'�'-� •Aye >1 , \ o �� -/ /� I LI,. o In„ ELEVATOR I LP = LOW POINT, TOW = TOP OF WALL FINISHED GRADE AT BACK OF WALL, - g S a o - / \ \ WOOD FENCE I °� o� - - /�// - I \ BOW = FINISHED GRADE BOTTOM OF WALL., GB = GRADE BREAK, FL = \ N 9,°'� �I = ( � /� �.,,.�,,.,�I \ \\ \ FLOWLINE, TOC = TOP OF CURB, GAW = GRADE AT WALL RELATIVE WALL TOP N \\ N \ ,, _ �! , 1 \ I I � 1VAvAI ' \\ \ OF WALL HEIGHTS ARE PROVIDED BY ARCH. OR LANDSCAPE. > II/,'/I / - _ _ _ \ / \ ,r - G I // " 7. TEMPORARY CUT/FILL SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED A STEEPNESS OF [1 :1] // ' - _ _ \ N N 11 2 �� MIL% FG- - - / // / �,,,j'� l (H:V). PERMANENT SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED [4:1] (H:V) [UNLESS NOTED �' - \ \ ‘;__,Co- Rso � Mill - - - -// -„ OTHERWISE] IN AREAS TO BE SEEDED OR SODDED. \\ N \ \ - - 1 Ilr' - /r N N\ \\ \�� [ - _ _ -/ 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED MANHOLE RIMS, / N\ \N \ N 2 Fc I VALVE BOXES, ETC. TO MATCH FINAL GRADE. .� / //� `\ N� N\\ \ / X90 _... 25oo SKI 8c S 0 BOARD I .Ci _ _ / / N \/ > tIFG CLUB VAILA 9. MARTIN/MARTIN IS PROVIDING LINE AND GRADE FOR THE RETAINING WALLS - _ - - - / / / \N N N N\\ \\ 21.14. _ 1.8% GARAGE FFE=8202. 0 SHOWN HEREON. THE WALL LAYOUT/GRADING SHOWN IS PROVIDED TO THE WALL / / / N\ N N \ \\ / RST FLOOR FFE=82 4.,I DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR AS A COURTESY. THE WALL DESIGNER SHALL TAKE INTO7-- / / / N\ N N \\ \\ 1 17D/L7R1F722'-.00 I CONSIDERATION ALL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION / / / \ \ I I AND REQUIREMENTS, AND GRADING/DRAINAGE PATTERNS IN THE DESIGN OF THE / / / ,, _ N N "TI TE\MAGIC CARPET" SKI LIT\\ \\ I WALLS. THE RETAINING WALL DESIGN NEEDS TO ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS OF / / / // \ N N N \ \ \ N I ■' UNCONTROLLED RUNOFF FROM UP-GRADIENT OF THE WALLS, INCLUDING / / / / \ NN \ \ \ \ \ 3:1 \ I■ _ LI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND EROSION. \ \ / / // // \N \N \ \ \ \ \ \� I II \ \ =, 10. RE: STRUCTURAL FOR WALL TYPICAL SECTIONS . . / / \ \ \ \ \ - - N - - N > ^ \/ ` I // // // N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N I i .:.Mi \\ \ - - - - \� �� 1 1 . PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAIL SEE SHEET C-32 / /7 // / , N \ \ \ I 822- 12. STAIRS SHALL INCLUDE HANDRAIL BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS. RE: ARCH. AND / / \ N \ \ \ \ I I 1 oo \ o / LANDSCAPE FOR HANDRAIL DETAILS. N L- N L_ / � \ 7/ /� / / � - \\ \\ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ N I � ���� 200 / / N - \ \ \ - \ I N I F ----- 7---- �� t- G vo \ N N N \ N I I ■I i_ \ 1 h O %A L_ \\ N � � � � \ � \ \ \ \ \\ cv Ire I I 1 I I I \\ I ~ 11- %Alb 2.00' I 2.00' I 2" BOLDING � \ N N \ \ N ! , , G 1� r� I I\I Foy FFG 7 3.5" , T 6" 0 \ \ \ oo coo `F �R • a� I I o�0 00 �E / ° a a , a OUTLINE \ N �`' I / 15, m- ,\° % \-5 a a a a a MIN. Et .1 WOOD RET. WALL \ N 1 \ oD \ I ( .gi _ IIIII_ I I \ 2 `• / -;•",..-7,-- O, - _�_ 4 - o" ��. _ ° I2o < <O O O O O O O O O O O O O0 OCAIIICDOCDOCAVD CD c::? IMP 1 I 6 1� • • • • • • • • • • • N s --- �I�w(pv.(I,pI,�h1� ' 6 CDOT CLASS 6 / / • \ \ \ \ \ \ 1-fsil 4:2:0,G°�6 2 56 / 2°�'6 svl•- c iiiii1 \ i�V NOTE: _ BASE COURSE Z 0 >/ 6 v� ,/ \ \ / / / COMPACTED TO/ / \ 1 +' / •'Fc / - SAWCUT OR TOOLED JOINT AT 10 O.C. < CO/ H -^ �- 1 / _ 0- 95% S.P.D. L / / / \ � , / \ `�`''^ �`�� _ �,Dyo -� �� - N - Nr 2 3.,% MODIFIED 4 CONCRETE PAN CO / / INV.IN 18 CMP I/ / / // / I / / / \ \ r°`. / // - - / . A` _ _ - � - WcNOT TO SCALE D / / / I / / \ \ / _ _ _2 �.,,��� / // ..., , / / I / COBBLE LINED SWALE \ \ / / / / �I' ��` ' '��� /FG 8225 W O / / / `� w / I �.�-. ����� .....„ ____.:_,__ _________„,_____\_\ FG / ,g AWARDS PODIUM 00 Z 0 '�,�� I / Ill RE: ARCH/LS.) , - , U) / DITCH / // co° 8.6% -/ / �hizzi/_ rr / F G ■ I 1 / / / 7 A / �g ao 3.0%- I / / / LECTRIC MA HOLE G :::i / NI1 / / / / / / -E, X6,1,° # F / / � � 82250 _ , / // / / / �� / / //// / 3.0% � �- \ / / ���' j / // / / - ��/ - - - - No. Descri tion Date INV.OUT 18" C�idP� / / / / �� / / / // / / 8230 {'\ - ■ / / / / /� / / / / / �L / Q1 BUILDING PERMIT 07-01-15 / / / / / / / / / / _a23 7 7 /7 / / / I O CI ,/ 7 / / 7 // / / // ----- ‘ ,-- / / ' ' 2 BUILDING PERMIT REVISIONS 08-15-16 11 // / / / // � �E� 7 66% j ///�Q // / / // // // / / � � � � � � � 3 UPDATED SET 09-08-17 / / / / � � 7> 7III / / / '146 / /7 / / / / i / • / // / // � �E �\ // / // ti� 7 / / / / 2 / / / � �I. . - 10 � � 235- / / // 7 / 7 SZ / � � \z gib / CA / / / /7 7 / ,823 - / I / / - / /7 7 N / / / / / , / 7 75 - 7 7 / / / / /j / // / / NO / // / / 7/ 7 7 N / / / / '� / - , - � � � � � / /IN .IN 78" C P � / / / / / / -- / -- /� \ / / / / / i / / / / / / / / / / / / i -/ 7 / / // / / - / -Omai/ - / \ / / / / v / / / / / / / / / / / / I ( ce ' ce ,82 _ IQ/ i / ✓ / / co / I/ / / / / / / 5/ / / 7 / ' , I I/ / / 7 7 Project ctNumber/ � / / / / / / / / / ` I I 14.0498 / / / / / / / o / / ASPHALT / / / / / / / / / / / 0I QI I / ALT / / RECREATION PATH / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / Date JUNE 1 2015 WALK / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / , / / // / / / / / // / / I I ( I/ / / / / I Drawn By REJ DETAILED L T� C 0 �, GRADING PLAN KNOW WHAT'S BELOW. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG . '. r. 1.....1 CALL 811 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE 10 5 0 10 20 SCALE: l ''=10' BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES C mm 31 MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY MARTIN/MARTIN LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, 225 MAIN STREET, UNIT C 101, EDWARDS,COLORADO 81632 MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES MAIN 970.926.6007 MARTINMARTIN.COM Scale as shown PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.