HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEC18-0032_Approved Documents_1541716213.pdf k-ci)
TOWN OF VA 1 L ACTION FORM
Planning& Environmental Commission(PEC)
Department of Commu nityDevelopment
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail,CO 81657
Tel: 970-479-2139
www.vailgov.com
Project Name: Torras Residence2018 Application Number: PEC18-0032
Specia
Application Type: (SDD) I Development District Date Applied: 08/15/2018
Project Description: Major SDD amendment to modify building envelope and requirement for on-site
employee housing
CONTACTS
Contact Type: Applicant
Full Name: Mauriello Planning Group (Allison Kent)
Address: Po Box 4777 2205 Eagle Ranch Road Eagle, CO Phone: 9703908530
81631
Contact Type: Property Owner
FullName: TORRAS, IGNACIO
Address: Phone: None
Project Address: 1170 WESTHAVEN LN (210312109005) (210312109005)
Job Site Location:
No
Legal Description: Subdivision: GLEN LYON SUBDIVISION Lot: 39 Block: Data
Parcel Nu tuber: 210312109005
BOARDS/STAFF ACTION
Motion By: Moffet Action: Approved 2nd Reading
Second By: Coggin
Vote: 7-0-0 Date: 11/06/2018
Conditions:
No Conditions.
Planner: Jonathan Spence
PLANNING FEE RECEIPT
TOWN OF VAIL Case # PEC18-0032
Date Printed: 10/03/2018
TOWN OF VAIL - FEES RECEIPT
Planning Summary
Type: Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) Submittal Date: 08/15/2018
Subcases: Special Development District(SDD)
Bond Expire D ate:
D escription of Work: Major SDD amendment to modify building envelope and requirement for on-site employee housing
Property Information
Address: 1170 WESTHAVEN LN (210312109005) Tax ID: 210312109005
Owner: TORRAS, IGNACIO
Contacts
Contact Type: Applicant
Company Name: Mauriello Planning Group
Full Name: Allison Kent
Address: Po Box 4777 2205 Eagle Ranch Road Eagle, CO 81631
Email: allison@mpgvail.com
Contact Type: Property Owner
Full Name: TORRAS, IGNACIO
Address:
Planning Fees
Fee Information Account Amount
Postage Fee 001-0000.31947.00 $35.35
Payment Information D ate Paid Payment Type Amount
Postage Fee 10/03/2018 Credit Card $35.35
Paid By: -Notes:Visa-Allison Kent
FEE TOTAL $35.35
AMOUNT PAID $35.35
BALANCE DUE $0.00
75 South Frontage Road West,Vail,Colorado 81657 10/03/2018 -11:51:54 AM-Generated by:dcouch
1/1
Mr.Jonathan Spence
Community Development Department
75 South Frontage Rd
Vail,CO.81657
Dear MT Spence:
We are the owners of tot 39-2 located within the Glen Lyon Subdivision and Special Development
District 114(SOD). The owner of Lot 39-1 r39-1 Owner')is proposing to modify some of the language in
the SOD regarding building envelopes and employee housing for lots 39-1 and 39-2. We have been
advised that 39-1 Owner is proposing to modify the building envelope for Lot 39-1 as shown on the
annexed plan.We also understand that the 39-1 Owner is proposing to modify certain employee
housing requirements for both tots 39-1 and 39-2. I have met with the 39-1 Owner's representative and
I am mvare of the changes being proposed.
We hereby consent to the submittal and processing of an application for an SOD amendment to the
Town of Vail with regard to the building envelope and employee housing unit.We have not been
advised of any other requested changes,modifications or consents to the SOD that may otherwise affect
our property and would appreciate notification if the SOD is expanded to include any such changes
Our allowing this application to be filed and processed is not a waiver of any of the provisions or rights
we may have with respect to the private covenants between lots 39-1 and 39-2.
Sincerely.
ROBIRT�I.. �
ROSEN 2005/ Q,P.RRT
it �
tte
Mark Nestler,Trustee
F-
Nancy Rose i,T t 1 e
/n �'t{JJSS i "--�,
l NAN tit,f A gN 200yQPICf
11�� i
Mark Pla Ann, Trus e-------- -
Y:.fi
Robert J. Rosen,Trustee
MAJOR AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #4 :
CASCADE VILLAGE
TO ALLOW FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE BUILDING
ENVELOPE ON LOT 39-1 AND THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE
EMPLOYEE HOUSING OFF-SITE
,`r
�- 4 `fit - ..-. _ ,x _
ii;:iiS
t , ,. -:.
' --. i, '� x * .,Y` _4
Ti's_
y
• - ;11.. "7.i-fir. 7 :
, , - • .r.. _,
- Applicant: Ignacio Torras
Submitted to the Town of Vail:
I u August 15, 2018
Mauriello Planning Group Revised September 18, 2018
I. INTRODUCTION
The owner of 1170 Westhaven Lane / Lot 39-1, Glen Lyon Subdivision, Ignacio Torras, is
requesting a major amendment to Special Development District (SDD) #4 Cascade Village to
allow for modifications to unique requirements placed on Lot 39-1. Specifically, the there is a
building envelope located on the property and a requirement for an on-site Type 2 employee
housing unit (EHU). Mauriello Planning Group, rep resentingthe owner, is requesting a Major
Amendment to Special Development District No. 4 to allow for an amendment to the building
envelope, language regulating the building envelope, and the ability to provide employee
housing off-site. The amended employee housing provision would allow both Lot 39-1 and
39-2 participate if the owners so choose. The ap p licantis prop osingto mitigate the relocation
of the employee housing unit off-site at rate of 2:1, meaning that they will provide double the
amount of square footage required. The SDD currently requires each lot to provide a 500 sq.
ft. unit onsite, so the mitigation rate of 2:1 would be a minimum of a 1,000 sq. ft. unit to be
provided. This mitigation rate mirrors the requirements of the Employee Housing Exchange
Program and results in more employee housing floor area within the Town of Vail.
Cascade Village was originally ap p rovedas a PUD under Eagle County jurisdiction. The area
was annexed by the Town of Vail in 1975, and zoned Special Development District No. 4 in
1976. The Special Development District has been amended over 40 times since its adoption
which is not surprising given the large amount of acreage and differing uses located in the
SDD. It is unique in that there is no underlying zoning for the property, and develop ment of the
site is entirely governed by the Special Development District adopting ordinance and
associated develop ment p lans.
Lot 39-1 and Lot 39-2 have an interesting and unique history. Originally Lot 39-1 and Lot 39-2
were one large duplex lot, Lot 39. In 1982, Resolution No. 10 allowed an amendment to SDD
#4 to allow Lot 39 to be divided into two single-family lots, along with a land dedication to the
Town's stream tract. In 1997, the
then-owner, requested a major
amendment to SDD #4 allowing
for the lots to be subject to the
GRFA requirements of the
Primary/Secondary zone district
like all of the other residential lots
within the SDD, while maintaining
' - the density of 1 unit per lot, plus
the ability to construct a Type 2
^Y EHU. At the time, the applicant
* r, proposed additional building
x ta ' envelope restrictions, limiting the
4i` �, area of development on the lot.
s($�. `,`r3 ' +,goy qe� At . ' .k a ° >;�
} $ f . .d lommi ,4, During the app royal p rocess, the
A Imulto �' t x Town Council approved the
k,7 3a� e ;
w r4".� �1 � � $ - request, addingthe requirement
„f � �� for each lot to include the
Building site for Lot 39-1, looking west construction of a Type2 EHU.
1
The original 1997 building envelopes were based on a specific plan for development of the
properties. The single family residence with a Type 2 EHU on Lot 39-2 was constructed in
2003. Lot 39-1 is currently vacant. At this time, the applicantis proposinga revised building
envelope for Lot 39-1. In order to regulate the improvements within the building envelope
more consistent with how the Town Code, the applicantis proposingto modify the language to
allow architectural projects, retaining walls, at-grade and above grade improvements,etc., to
be outside of the building envelope. Additionally, because the owner is a Padel enthusiast, a
secondary recreation envelope area is being prop osedfor a Padel court (recreational and patio
imp rovementswithout a roof).
The following is the current language from SDD #4 related to this application. The text
indicated as strike through is proposedto be removed, while the text indicated in bold is to be
added.
Development Standards
C. Area C, Glen Lyon Primary/Secondary and Single-Family Lots
Required setbacks shall be based on the Two-Family Primary/Secondary Residential
District, Section 12-6D-6, Setbacks, Vail Town Code. For single family Lots 39-1 and
39-2, development shall occur per the approved building envelopes and recreational
use envelope and is subject to the following:
All futurc dcvclopmcnt will bc rcstrictcd to thc ar a within thc building cnvclopcs.
The only dcvclopmcnt permittcd outsidc thc building cnvclopcs shall bc
landscaping, driveways (access bridgc) and retaining walls associated with
driveway construction. At gradc patios (those within 5 feet of existing or finished
gradc) will bc permittcd to projcct bcyond thc building cnvclopcs not morc than
tcn fcct (10') nor morc than onc half (1/2) thc distance bctwccn thc building
morc than onc fourth (1/4) thc minimum required dimcnsion bctwccn buildings.
The building shall be restricted to the area within the building envelope.
Access roads, driveways, site grading, and retaining walls are permitted
outside the building envelope. Architectural projections, including roof
overhangs, awnings, flues and chimneys shall be permitted to project four
feet (4 ft.) beyond the building envelope. Decks, balconies, steps,
pedestrian paths and sidewalks, pools, spas and hot tubs within five feet or
less of ground level shall be permitted up to seven and one half feet (7.5 ft.)
of property boundaries. Balconies, decks, terraces, pools, hot tubs, and
similar unroofed features at a height of more than five feet (5 ft.) above
ground level shall be permitted up to ten feet (10 ft.) of property boundaries.
Lot 39-1 also contains a recreational use envelope which restricts the
location of recreational improvements, including recreation courts,
specifically a padel court and its required unroofed enclosure. Buildings
are not permitted within the recreational use envelope.
2
Development Plans
Area C, Glen Lyon Primary/Secondary and Single Family Lots
1. Building Envelopes for Lots 39 1 and 39-2 per sheet, L-1, prepared by Design
Workshop, Inc.,dated 11-9-98.
2. Building and Recreational Use Envelopes for Lot 39-1 per sheet Al,
prepared by KH Webb Architects, dated September 2018.
Employee Housing
In Area C, Lots 39-1 and 39-2, shall each be required to provide a deed-restricted
Employee Housing Unit as follows:
1. The unit may be provided on-site, in which case it shall be a Type II,
Employee Housing Unit (EHU) per Chapter 12-13 of the Zoning Regulations of
at least 500 sq. ft. each., on cach lot. These lots shall not be entitled to the x-0-0
550 sq. ft. of additional GRFA. The 500 sq. ft. shall be included in the
allowable GRFA on these lots. Each lot shall also be entitled to 300 sq. ft. of
garage area credit for the employee housing unit,in addition to the 600 sq. ft.
garage area credit allowed per residence. The drivcway width of 12 is
rcquircd dwclling units and cmploycc housing units on thcsc lots.
2. The unit may be provided off-site, in which case it may be any type of
Employee Housing Unit (EHU) of at least 1,000 sq. ft.or comprised of
multiple units with floor areas totaling at least 1,000 sq. ft. Excess square
footage above the 1,000 sq. ft. requirement may be used to satisfy EHU
obligations or mitigation for other properties within the Town of Vail,
including but not limited to the EHU Deed Restriction Exchange Program
as provided in Section 12-13-5 of the Zoning Regulations and Inclusionary
Zoning Requirements as outlined in Chapter 12-24 of the Zoning
Regulations. No application pursuant to Section 12-13-5 is required to
implement this mitigation requirement.
3
,..,
• „,
;,-
• , N s / A . . S
. .
•;
, . . .- „•
•,". ' - •, •- .„, •, •,...,,,,-,•'.;-.,• ,•„s*, ., itr. '• ,
• 0 -,
. ,.._.,... ..,..< .
„ • ' " * ,,
•
; • . ,
•'''•'•'t , . '
• ,,
, ' •
, •, *
, ' •,
.......' , ,
,, ." ' •
. a
BUILDING D
,• • .1 ,
,
..., Fi--
,
: 2=r PROPOSED wr''- ° r-t
' RECREATIONAL-USE ' .
LOT 39-1 ,
.939 square feel Lu 0
1.043 ACRES(PLAT) CK LL
,.,
1.036 ACRES(CALC)
SKI RUN TO ' 06 U9
CASCADE LIFT
00Z 0
-
ow
•
Ni
_i
- >
D Z
CO LLJ
LOT 39-2
SITE PLAN
1170
PROPERTY ii. SEPTEMBER 2018
LINE
O..... UN/
7...0v WIN
Al
...
ProposedBuilding Envelopeand Recreational Use Envelopefor Lot 39-1
4
II. ZONING ANALYSIS
Lot Size:
Lot 39-1: 1.036 acres/45,128 sq. ft.
Lot 39-2: 1.22 acres/ 53,143 sq. ft.
Development 1998 Approval Proposed
Standard
Density No Change
Lot 39-1 1 du
Lot 39-2 1 du
GRFA (Based on P/S Zoning) No Change
Lot 39-1 9,357 sq. ft.
Lot 39-2 9,838 sq. ft.
EHU Requirement EHU required, but both properties may
Lot 39-1 Requirement for Type2 EHU on-site p rovide off-site employee housing units
Lot 39-2 Requirement forType2 EHU on-site ata floor area mitigation rate of 2:1
5
III. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW
Section 12-9A-2: DEFINITIONS, Vail Town Code defines a Major Amendment as follows:
Any proposal to change uses;increase gross residential floor area; change the number
of dwelling or accommodation units; modify, enlarge or expand any approved special
development district (other than "minor amendments" as defined in this section), except
as provided under section 12-15-4, "Interior Conversions", or 12-15-5, "Additional Gross
Residential Floor Area(250 Ordinance)" of this title.
Section 12-9A-8: DESIGN CRITERIAAND NECESSARY FINDINGS, Vail Town Code, provides
the criteria for review of a Major Amendment to a Special Development District. These criteria
have been provided below, along with an analysis of how this p rop osal comp lies with these
criteria:
1. Compatibility: Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent
properties relative to architectural --.1 -,F11„:;;-',.--•':-.::'-',--':1F s I " -� z
design, scale, bulk, building height, r a �i �, � >
buffer zones, identitycharacter �. ' x' ,El, ,---(..,c' :''
visual integrity and orientation. : `- y�, ' , i`' i ,,;`�tA
• f i''" ;1 A
Applicant Response: The r pv,-r,vtF ill , ' :..
proposed home has been to the - '""" °`
Design Review Board for afit,, ,,-,7
conceptual review and the Boardt:vir „1i-i ` I
alk s a �'"9�1 i p t ' ice— .{
was supportive of the design ,� ; �Q � ��.
„ ... _, , _,.,„...,„:
direction. Bulk and mass is k5:-. .-ii„::N-
� n, r
sensitive to the environment and `tt r a- u,,,• :� :. €. _' .- , .-
neighborhood. Theproposedhome
is well below allowable height, with ,,, p ,''Pt. : t'i X41 w a;
the lowest level of the home n ' �: a , r "'
partially below-grade, and the main -:; 4 'c is ,, .' i a
level generally at grade. There is t14/1 (' � ' 1;, ,,,,h''''',0,,,,1--'::',;'':' (','
I �`
no upperlevel. The home has been • • , .,,;, ', �e ;;, , a,1_ �,',:,� , ;.
vim;= ''' ,;, d1,11/,,);.,J;-:,,,4--', ip 'i
designed to disappear into the • -'!"1g1< t
'-, �I IIwI� , il'ilr, .
aspen forest behind the lot. It has a , Wig` x;
-
4 ; ----z-"—.:,. +
planted green roof and elements of � �,� ��� � � �; � �
aspen trees incorporated into the t' z ', rK=�A `
home with the design goal of41-4:4;':.
,1-� ^ :� .,, ,,i}", ,11,1,1::),41111 ' . i'i. '-:.
creating a house in a foreste �� �
Buffer zones are preserved, with . ,,d t-.y- ,'"i'-''-'...-.7-75-7'''';''11-;_ -_ - g ,..
landscaping along the access road ' m
Winter view and Summer view of the proposedhome. The design
remaining and enhanced, limiting looks to incorporate natural elements and disappearinto the asp en
the visibility of the site from 1-70 grove behind the property.
6
and the Frontage Road. Vegetation along the ski way is also preserved and enhanced.
The proposedchanges to the building envelope will have little impact upon neighbors
due to the remoteness of the property and buffer zones provided. The adjoining
property owner, Lot 39-2, has revised the proposed changes to the SDD and has
authorized the submittal of the application. The proposedchanges will not result in a
structure with any significant increase in bulk and mass on the property.
The proposalis in compliancewith this criterion.
2. Relationship: Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding usesand activity.
ApplicantResponse All uses, activity, and density are currently allowed by the SDD
for this property. There are no proposed amendments to the list of permitted,
conditional, and accessory uses. Density remains the same, with one dwelling unit plus
one Type 2 EHU allowed per lot. As a result, the proposalis in compliance with this
criterion.
3. Parking And Loading: Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in
chapter 10 of this title.
Ap p licantResp onse: All parking requirements will be met. The p roposedamendments
have no impact on this criterion.
4. Comprehensive Plan: Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail comprehensive
plan, town policies and urban design plans.
ApplicantResponse Cascade Village does not have a specific master plan beyond the
Vail Land Use Plan to provide guidance on development within the area. The following
land use goals and p olicies from the Vail Land Use Plan are app licableto the project:
1. General Growth/Development
1.1. Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the
visitor and the permanent resident.
1.3. The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever
possible.
The Town Vail Land Use Plan offers the following goals with regard to employee
housing:
5.3 Affordable employee housing should be made available through private
efforts, assisted by limited incentives, provided by the Town of Vail, with
appropriate restrictions.
5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded.
Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at varied sites
throughout the community.
In 2008, the Town of Vail established the Employee Housing Strategic Plan, which
brought together all of the Town's goals on employee housing into a single plan. It also
p rovides guidance ap p licableto this project:
The single goal of the Plan is clear and concise..."acquire 1,000 additional
resident housing unit deed restrictions by the year 2027." When achieved, this
goal, along with the more than 698 existing deed restricted homes, ensures
homes for more than 3,736 Vail residents.
In this case, the applicant is prop osing to mitigate employee housing at a rate of two
times the size of the EHU required for this site, in effect replacing a 500 sq. ft. EHU
requirement with a 1,000 sq. ft. EHU requirement which achieves the goals of the
Employee Housing Strategic Plan.
In 2006, through the Vail 20/20 Focus on the Future process the community
established a housing goal. It is as follows:
"The Town of Vail recognizes the need for housing as infrastructure that
promotes community, reduces transit needs and keeps more employees living in
the town, and will provide enoughdeed-restricted housing for at least 30 percent
of the workforce through policies, regulations and publicly initiated development."
Based upon the community's work, the Vail Town Council has confirmed the
Town of Vail recognizes deed restricted employee housing as basic
infrastructure. This type of housing allows employees to live within the town,
promoting community, and improving the quality of our local workforce, thereby
supporting the local economy, and reducing regional transit needs. The
Employee Housing Strategic Plan (EHSP) seeks to meet the expectations
established by the community and confirmed by the Town Council and provide
enough deed-restricted housing for at least 30 percent of the community's
workforce to live in the Town of Vail through a variety of policies, regulations and
publicly initiated development projects.
As indicated in this submittal, the prop osalcomp lies with and furthers the p urp osesand
goals of the Town's employee housing requirements and master plans. The proposal
conforms with the goals outlined in the Vail Land Use Plan.
5. Natural And/Or Geologic Hazard: Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic
hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed.
Applicant Response The proposed amendment has has no effect on the above
criterion. According to the Town of Vail Hazard Maps (GIS), there are no natural or
geologic hazards that affect the property.
8
6. Design Features: Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions
designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
ApplicantResponse The proposalto amend the building envelope has two important
objectives for the applicant:
• Creating a building envelopewhich is similar in size to the originally adopted building
envelope, but clarifying that roof overhangs and retaining walls can extend beyond
the envelope, which is consistent with how all other properties are treated by the
Town Code.
• Creating a secondary recreational use envelope for improvements such as patios
and recreational facilities, specifically the allowance for the p adel court the applicant
is proposing.
When the language regulating building envelopes was developed back in 1997 for Lot
39-1 and 39-2, the proposedenvelopeswere extensive and covered the entire buildable
area of the lots. The envelopes were similar to more traditional setbacks, and limited
development to areas with slopes below 40% and protected existing vegetation on the
site. The originally proposed envelopes which were reviewed by the Planning and
Environmental Commission in 1997 were based on this grap hic:
Prep taeotAl Ni riopg5 - —
0,,-(0,04 0F�'' /`
�K `fie— �.�--+vr ——'
f -` TaacT to ,M.! 3 X
/ .r mar q; a //
/
` // -'-''''' /// d 7=i,/�f m.�„"' SBF-I/�/}/// // r/ i4
v. _ r 7r ,l I4 //r /�
�i /_, '- i 1-� �1 I �/.,
y `mea;/ Cl
i �:� ,4 `�
•l" t- fat.japyLf /( > „o.�...,
SCE r/ i �; � PaIllINARY
i 45 // \ ) :// furs
!r � e 1 J "/ �y ELM
r..
7 � � l .. //, AGI " L-1
-
Building envelop esfor Lot 39-1 and Lot 39-2 as reviewed and recommended ap p rovaby the Planning and
Environmental Commission in 1997. The building envelop eswere sited to avoid steep slopes and existing
vegetation.
9
However, when reviewed by the Town Council in 1998, the building envelopes had been
further limited, and were app rovedbased on this graphic:
\ l. .
CEO of`Ip%'/' 'i l /
C:. e\-P:0% //
te\
62
,
0 ,
--- = °-
/ __ F 1 EFAT" �• /
-__ TO WN � Vtr+ _- .------ ------„..-7"----,.O J�
/ t'p 7iv,r
/ _ rte_ -- - �'
/ / _ _- - -- "�-- p__,°r-R; r — ---_
� R _
/ 'E -'`SNP '/' -T7 J I .--- i% /, i/1 //
�, / off C°__ - --- Borst _- i / j
i // / V. .fir =� �� / _ �// /I
/ / /
\ - /▪ -1
/ ,, 7 e 'X�;p'140. _ / /j '9�r// `, ,---- ",".; //'/�/ ,�//_
;� �_ // �� 1 /��\. i�il / /' t ��A
/ _----''.-Ni / 4.1 - }. ,1. / .. V /�' - ..,/
/ `• _r� ( �
/ Nati
( i ::; ,„ 116;0; i/ /• / / ,. /
Building envelop esfor Lot 39-1 and Lot 39-2 as app rovedby the Town Council in 1998. The building envelopes
were clearly located as to encomp assjust the structure itself. However,the language about what could occur
outside the building envelopewas not modified to allow for site improvementssuch as patiosand recreation
facilities or roof overhangs.
These building envelopes were likely the result of additional design of the homes for the
properties, and were designed to encompass the p rop osedhomes only. The language
regarding the restrictions on what could occur outside the building envelope was not
modified in responseto the reduction in the building envelope size.
The proposal corrects this oversight and creates two building envelopes: one
specifically for the home itself, and one that allows recreation facilities that are located
appropriately on the site.
In 1987, when the original Lot 39 was created, significant open space was granted to
the Town. Additionally the proposed location of the building envelope and recreation
use envelope are appropriately located to minimize impacts to mature vegetation uphill
on the property. The p rop osedenvelop e is sensitive to the natural areas of the property.
The prop osalis consistent with this criterion.
10
7. Traffic: A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on
and off site traffic circulation.
Applicant Response There are few effects on traffic with the proposed SDD
amendment. Initially, there was some concern about the ability of these lots to each
have a Type 2 EHU, as the development standards require a wider access to 4 units.
When requiring the Type 2 EHUs, the Town Council also specifically stated that the
access road width was adequate to serve these units. As a result, allowing the EHUs to
be located elsewhere actually serves to bring the road width into compliance with
current code, and is a benefit to the traffic anticipatedfor the units. The relocation of the
building envelope does not imp act the traffic circulation system.
8. Landscaping: Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function.
Applicant Response The building envelope has been located in such a way as to
minimize any impacts to existing trees and to ensure that development does not occur
on any areas with steep slopes. This allows for the preservation of natural features on
the lot. The envelope has also been located to minimize any impacts to views from
adjacent property owners, specifically those from Lot 39-1 and the applicant has
continued to work with this neighbor to ensure that the envelope location is appropriate
and minimizes impacts to their property.
9. Workable Plan: Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable,
functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
Applicant Response There is no phasing or subdivision plan associated with this
application.
11
IV. ADJACENTADDRESSES
TORRAS, IGNACIO
ALURA VAIL LLC 13 E RIVERCREST DR
1472 MATTERHORN CIR HOUSTON,TX 77042-2513
VAIL,CO 81657-4366
BLUME FAMILY PTNSHP
TOWN OF VAIL KRISTEN BLUME
FINANCE DEPT PO BOX 504
75 S FRONTAGE RDW CHEYENNE,WY 82003-0504
VAIL,CO 81657-5043
DEWS,JULIANNA
POINTES OF COLORADO PO BOX 362
EAGLE POINT RESORT VAIL,CO 81658-0362
1500 MATTERHORN CIR
VAIL,CO 81657-4354 DAVID W.STASSEN REVOCABLE TRUST
8171 BAY COLONY DR APT 501
THE EAGLE POINTE CONDOMINIUM NAPLES, FL 34108-7563
ASSOCIATION
EAST WEST RESORTS MONTE VISTA PARTNERS LLC
PO BOX 8280 2633 PEMBERTON DR
AVON,CO 81620 HOUSTON,TX 77005-3441
VAIL HOTEL PARTNERS LLC DOUBLE BLACK LLC
LAURUS CORPORATION 38 STRATFORD RD
ATTN:ANDRESSZITA HARRISON,NY 10528-1125
1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 1016
LOS ANGELES,CA 90067-1623 FLOWERS,DAVID& IZABEL
4701 S LAFAYETTE ST
VAIL CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD,CO 80113-5953
THE FIXED ASSETS DEPARTMENT
390 INTERLOCKEN CRES STE 1000 NANCY ANN HEINEN TRUST, NANCY ANN HEINEN
BROOMFIELD,CO 80021-8056 TRUSTEE
2565 SOM CENTER RD
SOHO DEVELOPMENT LLC HUNTING VALLEY, OH 44022-6651
FIXED ASSETS DEPT
390 INTERLOCKEN CRES STE 1000 ANNETTE G. FREY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
BROOMFIELD,CO 80021-8056 12604 E 127TH ST S
BROKENARROW, OK 74011-5650
SAVOY VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
INC. H&C STONE REVOCABLE TRUST
BOLD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 615 PALISADES AVE
P.O.BOX 5800, SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-2723
AVON,CO 81620
SHIM, JAMES- CHEN, CHARLENE L.
SIMBA RUN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 1226 WESTHAVEN CIR APT E
MCNEILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. VAIL,CO 81657-4359
2077 N FRONTAGE ROAD#D
VAIL,CO 81657 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
W 6TH AVE& KIPLING ST
EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT LAKEWOOD, CO 80225-0546
846 FOREST RD
VAIL,CO 81657-5704 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
JOAL HORMANN, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
ROBERT J. ROSEN 2005 QPRT- ETAL REAL ESTATE DIVISION,WE 330
1127 LAKEAVE SAN BRUNO, CA 94099
GREENWICH,CT 06831-2748
LIFTSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
12
ATTN: DON MACLACHLAN
VAIL RESIDENCESATHOTELTALISA
1476 WESTHAVEN DR
VAIL,CO 81657
LIFTSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC
1234 WESTHAVEN DR
VAIL,CO 81657-4394
CASCADE VILLAGEASSOCIATION
C/O VAIL RESIDENCES HOTEL TALISA
ATTN:MACLACHLAN
1476 WESTHAVEN DRIVE
VAIL 81657
CASCADE VILLAGE METRO DISTRICT
KIM SETER
SETER&VANDER WALL,P.C.
7400 EAST ORCHARD ROAD,SUITE 3300
GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80111
13
VAIL HOTEL PARTNERS LLC Cascade Village Association
Mauriello Planning Group LAURUS CORPORATION c/o Vail Residences Hotel Talisa
PO Box 4777 ATTN:ANDRES SZITA Attn:MacLachlan
Eagle,CO 81631 1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 1016 1476 Westhaven Drive
LOS ANGELES,CA 90067-1623 Vail 81657
ALURA VAIL LLC VAIL CORPORATION
1472 MATTERHORN CIR THE FIXED ASSETS DEPARTMENT SHIM,JAMES-CH EN,CHARLENE L.
VAIL,CO 81657-4366 390 INTERLOCKEN CRES STE 1000 1226 WESTHAVEN CIR APT E
BROOMFIELD,CO 80021-8056 VAIL,CO 81657-4359
TOWN OF VAIL SOHO DEVELOPMENT LLC FLOWERS,DAVID&IZABEL
FINANCE DEPT FIXED ASSETS DEPT
75 S FRONTAGE RD W 390 INTERLOCKEN CRES STE 1000 4701 S LAFAYETTE ST
VAIL,CO 81657-5043 BROOMFIELD,CO 80021-8056 ENGLEWOOD,CO 80113-5953
POINTES OF COLORADO SAVOY VILLAS CONDOMINIUM NANCY ANN H EINENTRUST,NANCY ANN
EAGLE POINT RESORT ASSOCIATION, INC. H EINENTRUSTEE
1500 MATTERHORN CIR Bold Property Management Solutions 2565 SOM CENTER RD
VAIL,CO 81657-4354 P.O.Box 5800, H UNTING VALLEY,OH 44022-6651
Avon,CO 81620
THE EAGLE POINTE CONDOMINIUM SIMBA RUN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Cascade Village Metro District
ASSOCIATION McNeill Property Management, Inc. Kim Seter
East West Resorts 2077 N Frontage Road#D
PO BOX 8280 VAIL,CO 81657 Seter&Vander Wall, P.C.
7400 East Orchard Road,Suite 3300
AVON,CO 81620 Greenwood Village CO 80111
EAGLE RIVER WATER &SANITATION LIFTSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
DISTRICT ROBERT J. ROSEN2005QPRT-ETAL Attn: Don MacLacHIan
846 FOREST RD 1127 LAKE AVE Vail Residences at Hotel Talisa
VAIL,CO 81657-5704 GREENWICH,CT 06831-2748 1476 WESTHAVEN DR
VAIL,CO 81657
TORRAS,IGNACIO BLUME FAMILY PTNSH P LIFTSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC
13 E RIVERCREST DR KRISTEN BLUME 1234 WESTHAVEN DR
HOUSTON,TX 77042-2513 PO BOX 504 VAIL,CO 81657-4394
CHEYENNE,WY 82003-0504
DEWS,JULIANNA DAVID W.STASSEN REVOCABLE TRUST UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
PO BOX 362 8171 BAY COLONY DR APT 501 JOAL HORMANN,U.S.POSTAL SERVICE
VAIL,CO 81658-0362 NAPLES,FL 34108-7563 REAL ESTATE DIVISION,WE 330
SAN BRUNO,CA 94099
MONTE VISTA PARTNERS LLC DOUBLE BLACK LLC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2633 PEMBERTON DR 38 STRATFORD RD W 6TH AVE&KIPLING ST
HOUSTON,TX 77005-3441 HARRISON,NY 10528-1125 LAKEWOOD,CO 80225-0546
ANNETTE G.FREY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST H&C STONE REVOCABLE TRUST
12604 E 127TH STS 615 PALISADES AVE
BROKEN ARROW,OK 74011-5650 SANTA MONICA,CA 90402-2723