The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutmemo grout acceptance 181019.pdf Schnabel FOUNDATION COMPANY October 19, 2018 Justin Fahnestock Haselden Construction 6950 South Potomac Street Centennial, CO 80112 303-334-1051 JustinFahnestock@haselden.com RE: Red Sandstone, Grout Acceptance Dear Justin, In response to the grout compressive strength results below the specified 5,000 psi per design, we have shown in the attached calculations that the strengths achieved are acceptable. Test results from Ground Engineering Consultants are attached. A table summarizing the grout strengths and design loads is below. Grout strength results below 5,000 psi Date installed Micropile Location Design Load 28-Day Compressive Strength (Kips) (PSI) 8/4/18 C8 50 4,890 8/8/18 D40 160 4,130 8/13/18 A6 160 4,480 8/28/18 A55 160 4,500 8/29/18 F6 50 4,970 7/26/18 A24 160 4,500 7/27/18 A81 160 3,230/4,300* 8/16/18 C12 160 4,080 9/6/18 D23 160 4,110 *56-daybreak Please contact me at 303-696-7268 if you have any questions. SCHNABEL FOUNDATION COMPANY Cody Pump, P.E. Construction Manager 2950 South Jamaica Court, Suite 107,Aurora, CO 80014 303-696-7268 fax 303-745-0887 Atlanta•Boston• Chicago•Denver•Houston•Philadelphia• San Francisco •Washington DC DESIGN CALCULATIONS Submitted to: HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION for: Red Sandstone Elementary Parking Garage 551 North Frontage Road West, Vail, CO 81657 by: SCHNABEL FOUNDATION COMPANY Job No. 17-5404 February 07, 2018 Revised March 15, 2018 Revised April 26, 2018 Revised May 25, 2018 +_� ��,� Revised June 29, 2018 �o �'D o cF�+,4 Revised October 19, 2018 (�'o°° �y ' 5225 �� ,vc (oJ NALEN Todd L. Duncan Colorado P.E. #35225 Schnabel FOUNDATION COMPANY Schnabel FOUNDATION COMPANY February 7, 2018 Revised 10/19/2018 SFC Job number 17-5404 Red Sandstone Elementary School Parking Garage Soil Nail Wall and Micro Piles Permanent Soil Nail Wall This revision is to show that the low grout compressive strength results for micropiles are acceptable. The lowest grout strength for each design scenario was used for acceptance for all other test results. For the 160-kip design load, at 3,200 psi grout strength, the micropile capacity is 164 kips. For the 50-kip design load, at 4,890 psi grout strength,the micropile capacity is 110 kips. These revisions are in addition to the original calculations. See original design submittal for additional information. 2950 South Jamaica Court, Suite 107,Aurora, CO 80014 303-696-7268 fax 303-745-0887 Atlanta•Boston• Chicago •Denver• Houston•Philadelphia• San Francisco•Washington DC Schnabel Micropile Design for Axial Load FOUNDATION COMPANY Compression y 7'. r /ii/ ,+i i / 0 i % i /// �7/ri1�"ia^ / /ii STEEL GROUT s red sandstone elem,160 kip,IBC Code acAsiNG max(ksi) aBAR max(ksi) acASED max(ksi) aUNCASED max(ksi)`, FHWA7.04:, /44rr0.4 i 040 ,- :4O1%.9\ Building Code IBC 0.40 �s 0.40////, , S. I 033, S., 0.30 Code to be Used for Analysis: MLR. MA State 0.402,n :::91,49;/-,i, 30 0.33 0.33 )6�i/i'% IIKIEMIlli;" '*42 a „ / 12 9.40:1 \\\..,,Y."' 0.Z,a.,ii\\,, For TBC,-Higher allowable steel stress equal to 03 F;'allowed if conditions in Section 1.£310.3.2.£3 Micropile Construction Details of code are met.Select 0.30 re for unconfined grout or 0.33 Fe if confined in rock. Bar Size: 18 Bar Area(in`): 4.00 Bar Steel Yield Stress(ksi): 75 t Bar Size Area(in) Casing Wall: Area Casing OD(in): None MaNcine,/Agrhoixt OD(in) '; (in) (in`) Casing Area(in`): 0.00 6 A 44\ None,. 0.000;,,, >040 ,r Casing Steel Yield Stress(ksi): 50 , „j! ;7 060 3 1/7",i 4.504. ,,4,71 •;. Uncased Hole Diameter(in): 8 �. ;;8/" ""°0 79 ... ,��4 , /0;500 '-*`-'-'5(54,-'-..,-;',4 Grout Area-Casing Only(in`): 0.00 g° 00 ,< **110// /,/, 501;7,.°'' 6;pf),, Grout Area-Bar Only(in`): 46.27 4 1. ye • %,/i i/! 5Q0, / .7. ,' Grout Area-Casing&Bar(in`): 0.00 1 06? ., ,w,v//,$ i 6 7-55 Grout Strength(ksi): 3.2 74 "' ' r " ' Thr I3tI '6 gA,2 Grout Elastic Modulus(ksi): 2000 %r18 4007' ' a0' 0. /;;/4_. :i .L.,;2,01.0,, ,;-4,0,00,A.,F1. ra'''. Casing Casing& 24 //,LOS - 95/$ 9 45/ _a///' Bar Only Allowable Strength Design Only Bar 8 /!?%967 j„1,9 14,4a O.a4. j, 1 71 Allowable Strength of Steel(kips): 0.00 120.00 0.00 VACustcart;- 11 /4 05"4 °"118/x; Allowable Strength of Grout(kips): 0.00 44.41 0.00 < E<I2431. _, 05001 1f9424%. Total Allowable Strength(kips): 0.00 164.41 0.00 Custom Note:liar Bole cross.sectiun satisfies SFA State/tmernattonat Ituitdtng Eode regotrement that retntircing steel carry at least 4USfi of the Design Lead. - >=(AreaSTEEL x aSTEEL x fymin)+(AreaGROUT x aGROUT x f0) Strain Compatibility Analysis @ Design Load Values given below for Bar,Only Design Load(kips): 160 %DL stress(ksi) asrEEL-EST aGROUT-EST Estimated Load in Steel(kips): 89.0 zum0. 55.6 22.3 0.30 NA Estimated Load in Grout(kips): 71.0 44.4 1.5 NA 0.48 Strain Compatibility Analysis @ Maximum Test Load Maximum Test Load,TL(kips): 320 %TL stress(ksi) USTEEL-EST 0GROUT-EST Estimated Load in Steel(kips): 178.0 mEs0 55.6 44.5 0.59 NA Estimated Load in Grout(kips): 142.0 44.4 3.1 NA 0.96 Elastic Deflections Design Test Design Test Unbonded Length Load Load Zone 3 Load Load Structural Section Bar Only Structural Section Length(ft): 0 0 Length(ft): Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): Zone 1 Length mobilized(ft): 0.0 0.0 Structural Section Casing&Bar Load at top of Zone 3(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length(ft): P>6.0 Load at bottom of Zone 3(kips): 0.0 0.0 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): 8.0 Average Load in Pile(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length mobilized(ft): 6.0 6.0 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Load at top of Zone 1(kips): 160.0 320.0 Average Grout Stress(ksi): Load at bottom of Zone 1(kips): 112.0 272.0 Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Average Load in Pile(kips): 136.0 296.0 Zone 4 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Structural Section Average Grout Stress(ksi): Length(ft): Deflection(in): Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): Zone 2 Length mobilized(ft): 0.0 0.0 Structural Section Bar Only Load at top of Zone 4(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length(ft): 35.0 Load at bottom of Zone 4(kips): 0.0 0.0 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): 8.0 Average Load in Pile(kips): 0.0 0.0 • Length mobilized(ft): 14.0 34.0 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Load at top of Zone 2(kips): 112.0 272.0 Average Grout Stress(ksi): Load at bottom of Zone 2(kips): 0.0 0.0 Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Average Load in Pile(kips): 56.0 136.0 Average Steel Stress(ksi): 7.8 18.9 Summary Average Grout Stress(ksi): 0.5 1.3 Total Length Mobilized(ft): 20.0 40.0 Deflection(in): 0.045 0.266 Total Elastic Deflection(in): Copyright 2012 Schnabel Foundation Company • Schnabel Micropile Design for Axial Load FOUNDATION COMPANY Compression't,77-7-771 .4,,2-5.::, o77,: '' STEEL GROUT red sandstone elem,50 kip,IBC Code acdswG max(ksi) aBAR max(ksi) aCASED max(ksi) aUNCASED Max(ksi), FHWA z wi,0100 04T 41` 040E "0� t R4t)X00\, Building Code IBC 0.40 .32 ,040„ 30 033//\ S 0 30 �� Code to be Used for Analysis: ELM MA State 0.4032 ,,,,it 140 30 y."'- « r //Q�33 1.6 ,, Chicago M12 \'',T `3 $i1,2ii litV"' �A','''� .'0.25 Custom ,.,.,,,aZZuI „ �,� ash For IBC•Higher allowable steel stress equal to 0,5 Fy allowed if conditions in Section 1.£310.3.2.8 Micropile Construction Details of code are met.Select 0.30 Fr for unconfined grout or 033 fc if confined in rock. Bar Size: 10 Bar Area(in`): 1.27 Bar Steel Yield Stress(ksi): 75 :: Bar Size Area(in`); Casing Wall.' Area Casing OD(in): None 5None W,1000 OD(in) (in) (in`) Casing Area(in`): 0.00 6 0 44..:. None '; ,,'0.000 0,00" Casing Steel Yield Stress(ksi): 50 - ',7„,i;''y///, 60 , 3 1/24,"22;91,§00, r-7 Uncased Hole Diameter(in): 8 _ /:fl 7g 4 ' 1 l5O0 "1' i0 / Grout Area-Casing Only(in`): 0.00 1j g0Y� 4 531;' MUM', . Grout Area-Bar Onlyin` e /7 Grout Area-Casing&Bar(in2): 0.00 ',11 q''''.'(,,58 os0 // Grout Strength(ksi): 4.89 .1,4:•0A,, '''.:9.,Z,25'&"'''25��''^ S6t5/8 ":; .',(P00'.',,'. ,,, .62.. Grout Elastic Modulus(ksi): 2000 > x l 0 //' 7 0500.+ a p10V24' Q ./%,4.91 " 7„5/8 '; � 05Q0 i./A4109 Casing Bar Only Casing& 4 t0 , 9 5tfrA ri0.545 1 57 Allowable Strength Design Only Bar ' ''..P3'''''':M9,1-64!"„ A10314% 05),r x71471 ' Allowable Strength of Steel(kips): 0.00 38.10 0.00 , tStotn '*'11.:1/42101191511.51g 1918 Allowable Strength of Grout(kips): 0.00 71.88 0.00 < domolt 0500 %19'24 Total Allowable Strength(kips): 0.00 109.98 0.00 Custom -,',„via Note:Bar OW ero55.Section satisfies MA State%lnternattottai Building Code requirement that reinforcing steel early at least 40%of the Design Load. >=(AreasTEEL x aSTEEL X fymin)+(AreaGROUT X aGROUT x f'c) Strain Compatibility Analysis @ Design Load Values given below for Bar Only Design Load(kips): 50 %DL stress(ksi) aSTEEL-EST 0GROUT-EST Estimated Load in Steel(kips): 13.7 essits. 27.3 10.8 0.14 NA Estimated Load in Grout(kips): 36.3 EX4 72.7 0.7 NA 0.15 Strain Compatibility Analysis @ Maximum Test Load Maximum Test Load,TL(kips): 100 %TL stress(ksij aSTEEL-EST aGRouT-EST Estimated Load in Steel(kips): 27.3 il. 27.3 21.5 0.29 NA Estimated Load in Grout(kips): 72.7 sma4t. 72.7 1.5 NA 0.30 Elastic Deflections Design Test Design Test Unbonded Length Load Load Zone 3 Load Load Structural Section Bar Only Structural Section Length(ft): 0 : 0 Length(ft): Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): Zone 1 Length mobilized(ft): 0.0 0.0 Structural Section Casing&Bar Load at top of Zone 3(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length(ft): 6.0 Load at bottom of Zone 3(kips): 0.0 0.0 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): 8.0 Average Load in Pile(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length mobilized(ft): 6.0 6.0 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Load at top of Zone 1(kips): 50.0 100.0 Average Grout Stress(ksi): Load at bottom of Zone 1(kips): 2.0 52.0 Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Average Load in Pile(kips): 26.0 76.0 Zone 4 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Structural Section Average Grout Stress(ksi): Length(ft): Deflection(in): Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): Zone 2 Length mobilized(ft): 0.0 0.0 Structural Section Bar Only Load at top of Zone 4(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length(ft): 20.0 Load at bottom of Zone 4(kips): 0.0 0.0 Ultimate Bond Capacity(kips/LF): 8.0 Average Load in Pile(kips): 0.0 0.0 Length mobilized(ft): 0.3 6.5 Average Steel Stress(ksi): Load at top of Zone 2(kips): 2.0 52.0 Average Grout Stress(ksi): Load at bottom of Zone 2(kips): 0.0 0.0 Deflection(in): 0.000 0.000 Average Load in Pile(kips): 1.0 26.0 Average Steel Stress(ksi): 0.2 5.6 Summary Average Grout Stress(ksi): 0.0 0.4 Total Length Mobilized(ft): 6.3 12.5 Deflection(in): 0.000 0.015 Total Elastic Deflection(in): Copyright 2012 Schnabel Foundation Company Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 5,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0019;ver:3 Work Order Date: Aug 6,2018 Reviewed by: Chris Hutto General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Chris Leeper Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Sampling Placement Location: Micropile C8:GL B.9/1.2 On-Site Notifications Name Company Tom Highsmith Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 7 Micropile C8: GL B.9/1.2 75 Monday,August 6,2018 2:51 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 7 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem247 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 11780 2950 Cem248 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 12830 3210 Cem249 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 12750 3190 Cem250 7 1.98 1.97 3.90 13950 3580 Cem251 7 1.99 1.99 3.96 13620 3440 Cem252 7 2.00 1.99 3.98 13720 3450 Cem253 28 2.01 1.97 3.96 19470 4920 4920 Cem255 28 1.99 1.99 3.96 18740 4730 4730 Cem254 28 1.80 1.99 3.58 17940 5010 5010 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4890 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 5,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0020;ver:3 Work Order Date: Aug 8,2018 Reviewed by: Shane Sorensen General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Chris Leeper Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Sampling Placement Location: Micropile D40:GL D.1/3.1 On-Site Notifications Name Company Tom Highsmith Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 8 Micropile D40: GL D.1/3.1 78 Wednesday,August 8,2018 2:23 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 8 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem256 3 1.98 1.98 3.92 12160 3100 Cem257 3 1.99 1.98 3.94 11270 2860 Cem258 3 1.98 2.00 3.96 11780 2970 Cem259 7 1.96 1.96 3.84 12540 3270 Cem260 7 1.99 1.98 3.94 12790 3250 Cem261 7 1.96 1.99 3.90 13020 3340 Cem262 28 1.99 2.01 4.00 17050 4260 4260 Cem264 28 1.98 2.00 3.96 15990 4040 4040 Cem263 28 2.02 2.03 4.10 16780 4090 4090 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4130 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 11,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0022;ver:4 Work Order Date: Aug 13,2018 Reviewed by: Chris Hutto General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Chris Leeper Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Sampling Placement Location: Micropile A6:GL A.0/2.9 On-Site Notifications Name Company Tom Highsmith Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 9 Micropile A6: GL A.0/2.9 78 Monday,August 13,2018 1:12 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Strength at 9 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) Max.Load(Ib- Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem265 3 2.01 1.94 3.90 11160 2860 Cem266 3 2.01 1.96 3.94 11750 2980 Cem267 3 2.05 2.00 4.10 11670 2850 Cem268 7 1.98 1.96 3.88 16500 4250 Cem269 7 2.01 2.02 4.06 16290 4010 Cem270 7 1.98 1.98 3.92 15630 3990 Cem271 28 2.00 2.01 4.02 18560 4620 4620 Cem273 28 2.00 2.01 4.02 18480 4600 4600 Cem272 28 2.03 2.03 4.12 17360 4210 4210 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4480 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 27,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0028;ver:4 Work Order Date: Aug 27,2018 Reviewed by: Chris Hutto General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Tyler Wiegand Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout test sample taken Placement Location: Pile#A55 Comments: Grout test sample taken Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 16 Pile#A55 75 Monday,August 27,2018 5:20 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 16 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem346 3 1.98 1.96 3.88 9060 2340 Cem347 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 10090 2520 Cem348 3 2.01 2.01 4.04 10060 2490 Cem349 7 2.01 1.98 3.98 14120 3550 Cem350 7 2.04 1.96 4.00 14720 3680 Cem351 7 1.98 2.00 3.96 15120 3820 Cem352 28 2.00 2.00 4.00 17970 4490 4490 Cem354 28 2.01 2.02 4.06 18510 4560 4560 Cem353 28 2.00 2.01 4.02 17940 4460 4460 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4500 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 27,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0029;ver:3 Work Order Date: Aug 29,2018 Reviewed by: Shane Sorensen General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Tyler Wiegand Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Sample taken Placement Location: Pile#F6 Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 17 Pile#F6 75 Wednesday,August 29,2018 12:05 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 17 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem355 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 10360 2590 Cem356 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 11520 2880 Cem357 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 10800 2700 Cem358 7 2.00 1.99 3.98 13710 3440 Cem359 7 1.97 2.01 3.96 13740 3470 Cem360 7 1.98 1.97 3.90 13110 3360 Cem361 28 2.00 2.00 4.00 19870 4970 4970 Cem363 28 2.00 2.00 4.00 20490 5120 5120 Cem362 28 2.00 2.00 4.00 19300 4830 4830 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4970 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 2 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Aug 23,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0031;ver:4 Work Order Date: Jul 26,2018 Reviewed by: Chris Hutto General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Chris Leeper Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Cubes Cast Placement Location: Micropile A24 On-Site Notifications Name Company Robbie Kloehn Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 2 Micropile A24: GL A.0/5.1 78 Thursday,July 26,2018 3:15 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 2 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem193 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 11260 2820 Cem194 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 10980 2750 Cem195 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 11970 2990 Cem196 7 2.01 1.98 3.98 13490 3390 Cem197 7 2.04 1.94 3.96 12670 3200 Cem198 7 2.02 1.92 3.88 12720 3280 Cem199 28 2.01 1.97 3.96 16800 4240 4240 Cem201 28 1.94 2.00 3.88 17930 4620 4620 Cem200 28 2.01 1.93 3.88 17980 4630 4630 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4500 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 21,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0032;ver:5 Work Order Date: Jul 27,2018 Reviewed by: Shane Sorensen General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Chris Leeper Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout Sampling Placement Location: Micropile A81 On-Site Notifications Name Company Tom Highsmith Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 3 A.2/5.2 75 Friday,July 27,2018 2:50 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 3 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem203 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 9780 2450 Cem202 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 9560 2390 Cem204 3 2.00 2.00 4.00 8990 2250 Cem205 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 10680 2670 Cem206 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 10210 2550 Cem207 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 10530 2630 Cem208 28 2.00 2.03 4.06 13080 3220 3220 Cem209 28 1.96 2.01 3.94 12770 3240 3240 Cem210 56 2.00 2.00 4.00 17180 4300 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 3230 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Sep 19,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0036;ver:4 Work Order Date: Aug 15,2018 Reviewed by: Shane Sorensen General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Tyler Wiegand Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout cubes cast for micropiles Placement Location: C12,C.0/2.1 Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 10 C12,C.0/2.1 80 Wednesday,August 15,2018 2:15 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Max.Load(Ib- Strength at 10 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) f) Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem283 3 1.98 1.96 3.88 6740 1740 Cem284 3 1.96 1.97 3.86 7110 1840 Cem285 3 1.99 2.01 4.00 6920 1730 Cem286 7 2.01 2.00 4.02 8370 2080 Cem287 7 2.01 2.00 4.02 8230 2050 Cem288 7 2.01 2.00 4.02 8220 2040 Cem289 28 1.98 2.02 4.00 16070 4020 4020 Cem291 28 1.99 2.02 4.02 16640 4140 4140 Cem290 28 2.00 2.00 4.00 16320 4080 4080 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4080 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 1 Client: Chad Salli Town of Vail GROUND 1309 El 81rn Drive ENGINEERING Red Sandstone Parking Garage Report Date: Oct 4,2018 Work Order No.: 18-6523.Other(MaterialsTesting).0045;ver:3 Work Order Date: Sep 6,2018 Reviewed by: Shane Sorensen General Comments General Contractor: Haselden Performed by: Tyler Wiegand Subcontractor: Schnabel Services Performed: Grout samples taken and molded from pile#### Placement Location: GL C.9/9.0, pile#D23 Comments: Grout samples taken at pile#D23,elevation 8194.9 On-Site Notifications Name Company Tom Highsmith Haselden Construction Compressive Strength Specifications Specification Title Property Specified Grout Cubes Grout Cubes Compressive Strength(psi) 4000 min. Hydraulic Cement Sampling Sample Location Ambient Temp(°F) Date and Time of Sample Number 20 C.9/9.0 68 Thursday,September 6,2018 5:30 PM Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (ASTM C109/C109M) Sample No. Strength at 20 Lab ID Age(d) Width 1 Width 2 Area(sq.in.) Max.Lf)ad(Ib- Strength(psi) Acceptance (psi) Cem391 4 2.02 2.00 4.04 7300 1810 Cem392 4 2.00 2.00 4.00 7040 1760 Cem393 4 2.00 2.00 4.00 7740 1940 Cem394 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 8080 2020 Cem395 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 8870 2220 Cem396 7 2.00 2.00 4.00 9570 2390 Cem397 28 2.01 1.99 4.00 16310 4080 4080 Cem399 28 1.99 1.99 3.96 16800 4240 4240 Cem398 28 1.98 1.98 3.92 15720 4010 4010 Average Compressive Strength(psi): 4110 Results apply only to specific items and locations referenced and at the time of testing,observations or special inspections.Unless noted otherwise,samples were received in adequate condition.This report should not be reproduced,except in full,without the written permission of GROUND Engineering Consultants,Inc. www.groundeng.com Englewood I Commerce City I Loveland I Granby I Gypsum Page 1 of 2