HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-7-596.01 (11-06-18) Secondary Unit ExcObs signed.pdf H-P-.KU mAR5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs,CO 81601
Geotechnical Engineering I Engineering Geology Phone:(970)945-7988
Materials Testing I Environmental Fax:(970)945-8454
Email: hpkglenwood@kumarusa.com
Office Locations: Parker, Glenwood Springs,and Silverthorne, Colorado
November 6,2018
Paragon Homes
Attn: Ed Venerable
6460 S. Quebec St. #400
Centennial, Colorado 80111
ed@paragonhomesdenver.com
Project No. 16-7-596.01
Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Secondary Unit of Duplex Residence, Lots
14A and 14B,Bighorn Fifth Addition,4872 Meadow Lane, Vail, Colorado
Dear Ed:
As requested, a representative of H-P/Kumar observed the excavation at the subject site on
October 29 and November 1 and 6, 2018 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support.
The findings of our observations and recommendations for are presented in this report. The
services are supplemental to our agreement for professional services to Paragon Homes dated
August 21, 2018. We previously observed the primary (north) duplex unit excavation at the site
and presented our findings in a report dated August 23, 2018 under the above project number.
We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our
findings in a report dated February 7, 2017, Project No. 17-7-596. The proposed construction is
similar to that discussed in that report. The secondary residence is the southern unit of the
duplex at the site and has been designed to be supported on spread footings using an allowable
bearing pressure of 2,000 psf based on recommendations provided in the subsoil study report.
On October 29, the excavation was well underway and nearly complete, and had been cut
generally at two levels up to about 40 feet below the adjacent ground surface daylighting to the
northwest. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of relatively dense, silty
sand and gravel with cobbles. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the
silty sand and gravel with cobble soils (minus 3-inch fraction) obtained from the site are
presented on Figure 1. Groundwater was encountered in the excavation and we recommended
the groundwater be controlled by trenches to a sump and pump system or to gravity outlet as
feasible. The soils were moist to wet.
On November 1, a construction dewatering drain system had been installed consisting of a series
of perimeter and interior drain pipes placed in shallow trenches with gravel below design footing
elevation with the pipes out-letting to a perforated concrete manhole to the northwest of the
excavation. The drains appeared to be adequately controlling the groundwater; however, a few
Paragon Homes
November 6, 2018
Page 2
wet areas of footing subgrade were observed. On November 6, we observed the excavation
subgrade in all footing areas to be firm and the groundwater being adequately controlled, and the
footing subgrade areas were not frozen. The footing areas were formed at this time.
The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are generally consistent with those previously
encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the
recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. There could be some differential
settlement due to the variable cut depths and assumed variable foundation loading. Loose and
disturbed soils should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural coarse
granular soils and the subgrade compacted. The water seepage into the excavation should
continue to be collected and diverted away from the footing areas and any softened soils and
mud removed before concrete placement. The bearing soils should be protected from frost and
concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous
report which are applicable should also be observed.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed
within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site.
Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of
foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation
conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not
include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological
contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a
professional in this special field of practice should be consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance,please call our office.
Sincerely,
�i
t IT et
CI Z
�s 32 13 f 7
David A. Young, ` oits&bi t
DAY/kaciZYNAL r-rto���
attachments Figure 1 - Gracfation Test Results
cc: Vail Construction Group—Jay Nobrega(iay@vailconstructiongroup.com)
H-Pk4KUMAR
Project No. 16-7-596.01
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24 HRS 7 MRS
100 45 MIN 15 MIN 60MIN 19MIN 4MIN 1MIN 6 00 1100 450 440 630 410 I10 8 44 3 6" 3 4' I I/2 3" 5.6. 6+0
I I
90 t
I i H 180
IIPF
I - 20
70 t r I
` I I 30
I 40 0
1
50 I I -- I 50
III
40
IIIIIM
�
r E
I 60
30
IPi I
70
zo I 1 I I
1 i eo
I — I
io 1 - I r
I I so
0 I I 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 t II 1 till I i 111111 I 1
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .075 .150 .300 I .600 1.16 12.36 4.75 9.5 19 36.1 1 176.2 t 127 20000
I .425 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT SAND GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES
GRAVEL 46 % SAND 34 X SILT AND CLAY 20
SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Bottom of Southwest Portion of
Secondary Unit Excavation, 10-29-18
•i
Zi
i
i
1
I
I
i
al1
I
;1
I
i
1
These test results apply only to the
ksamples which were tested. The
testing report shall not be reproduced.
except in full, without the written
approval of Kumar& Associates. Inc.
Sieve analysis testing is performed in
accordance with ASTM D422, ASTM C136
and/or ASTM 01140.
e
,6
1l' 16-7-596.1 H-P�KUMAR GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1