Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB18-0449 LeadPaint report.pdf -orq Ds Environmental "The trusted choice for your environmental & industrial hygiene needs." LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT Vantage Point Lionshead Condominiums — Unit 401 508 E Lionshead Or, Vail, Colorado PRESENTED TO: INSPECTED BY: PROJECT DETAILS: .flr. -!Mille Krohn f r Chris Lohman i DMS job Number: 1863.51 Rusty Pike Enterprises DS Environmental Date of Inspection: October 5, 2018 PO Box 1517 Cell: (720)369-6609 Vail, CO 81658 • • Front Range 7555 W 10th Ave Mountains PO Box 6864 Western Slope PO Box 3793 Suite A,Lakewood,CO 80214 Avon,CO 81620 Aspen,CO 81612 Web dsconsuit nginc.com Direct(303)286-9094 Fax(303)986-0121 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Definitions 3.0 Scope of Work 4.0 Inspector & Firm Certifications 5.0 Data Interpretation 6.0 Overview of Findings 7.0 Equipment Information 8.0 Inspection &Testing Procedures 9.0 Conclusion & Recommendations 10.0 Disclaimer & Limitations 11,0 Copyright Notice APPENDIX A XRF Data Table APPENDIX B Inspector & Firm Certificates 2 1.0 Introduction Mr. Chris Lehman with DS Environmental Consulting (DS) performed a limited-scope, lead-based paint (LBP) inspection and performed in situ X-Ray Florescence (XRF) testing to determine the presence of LBP on select painted building components within the residence detailed on the cover page of this report. The purpose of the limited-scope inspection slay to identify any 1,BP present .on the building compoir;erits, as defined by the client, that may be impacted by renovation activities. XRF testing was conducted on the upper bathroom walls and ceiling in the sink/vanity are, as well as the upper bathroom toilet / shower room walls, ceiling, and floor. LBP was not found on the tested components. Table 1 and Table 2 in Section 6.0 further details the materials that contain LBP and those that do not. The full table (Table 3), including all XRF readings, can be found in Appendix A. 2.0 Definitions Room Equivalent is an identifiable part of a residence, such as a room, a house exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway or an exterior area Lead-based Paint (LBP) is any paint having concentrations of lead greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, which is also Colorado's action level. Limited-scope means the extent of the inspection and XRF testing included in this report was limited to a subset of the entire residence, was not a lead hazard assessment, and was not a full-building inspection. No water, air, dust or soil samples were collected or analyzed to determine the respective lead concentrations. Paint is any liquid mixture, usually of solid pigment in a liquid form, used as a decorative or protective coating. This includes, but is not limited to, primer, lacquer, polyurethane, wood stain, etc. V-Ra Florescence 1.X111-) i5 a non-destructive analytical technique used to determine the elemental composition of materials.XRF analyzers determine the chemistry of a sample by measuring the fluorescent(or secondary) X- ray emitted from a sample when it is excited by a primary X-ray source. 3.0 Scope of Work The scope of the limited LBP inspection was limited to specific areas of the building defined by the client. The remaining areas within the building, garage or any out-building on the property were not included in the scope of the inspection. The limited LBP inspection did not constitute a full building inspection or hazard assessment. Additionally, there may be other components in other parts of the building that contain LBP, which were not i_ i_ � - i_ of • , s• _ in hide l ill the ,cope of this .."-,. F-rTion and sampling, L7 4.0 Certifications Mr. Lehman is a Colorado State Certified LBP Inspector; having EPA Accreditation #24948. DS Environmental Consulting is a Colorado State Certified Lead Evaluation Firm, license#16918. Mr. Lehman is certified to operate the RMD LPA-1 XRF Lead Paint Spectrum Analyzer by the manufacturer(see Appendix B for certificates). 3 5.0 Data Interpretation When evaluating the information included in this report,Wall "A" in each room is the wall where the main front a!_ _ s__ __ _ located 1 /___ _i:aligned i3__ street). While 1__'._ 'Wall wJ/ _.__I _Y_ _Y___.�__ entrance UUUr to we cloche Is located (Ur aligned -with the street). vvriile Iaclrlg 'Wait H and going clockwise, Wall "B" will always be to the right, Wall "C" directly to the rear and Wall "D"to the left. Ceilings and floors are designated with an asterisk. If a component, i.e. baseboard, window sill, or door jamb, contains LBP in any room equivalent, then all other components that are similar in color, substrate and painting history can be assumed to be positive as well with no additional testing, regardless of their location in the structure; however, this extrapolation cannot be made the same with negative {.{JII! vlicJit.7. i1 a {.VJ11 VltcliL i.7 negative for LB only LIIe components s in that soon! s" w w s r p,,.,"" equivalent can be assumed negative, additional testing must be done to similar components in each room equivalent. All walls shall be tested in room equivalents with four or less wails and a minimum of four different walls in room equivalents with more than four walls for all walls to be determined negative; however,the scope of work for a limited-scope inspection may dictate that not all walls are to be impacted; therefore, not all walls will be tested. **Please note that due to the limited nature of this inspection, only the materials included in this report, in the 'orations identified, have been tested and nn assumptions have been mad/. to the le?d-content of similar components in other areas. All inaccessible areas are assumed to be positive, even though they were not able to be tested. These areas may not be listed in this report. 6.0 Inspection, Sampling gt Analytical Procedures Table 1: Components that Contain LBP I No tested components were found to contain LBP Table 2 Components that Do Not Contain LBP I Read Room/Men I Wall I Str�uct�ure faint Substrate Paint Cor F I sad(mg cm2) 1 Resu!t ! No. v 3 - l.Una •w. t Upper Bathroom Toilet 67 A Wall intact Tile Beige -0.1 Neg /Shower Room ' ' BdthroG! Toilet"i!et 68 I I t I I t Ceiling I Intact I Tile l Beige I -0.3 I Neg /Shower Room 69 Upper Bathroom Toilet B Floor Intact Tile Beige -0.3 Neg 4 , /Shower Room Upper Bathroom Sink/ i 70 D I Ceiling , Intact Drywall Eggshell 0.22 s Sieg Vanity Area Upper Bathroom Sink/ I i 71 �J, +./Area ! C i Wall Intact ; Drywall ! Eggshell -0.2 i Neg 4 7.0 Equipment Information LBP concentrations were obtained using a RMD Model LPA-1 XRF Lead Paint Spectrum Analyzer, which is approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)to determine the concentration of lead in paint. he RIV1f LDUIA_1 XRF Lead Paint Spectrum Analyzer lVU.J calibrated UrrnrUinn to the manufacturer's Dnbrfnrma!ce Characteristic Sheet (PCS). The XRF was calibrated using the calibration standard block of known 1.0 mg/cm2 lead content as well as a standard block of known 0.0 mg/cm2 lead content. Three (3) calibration reading of each block were taken before the inspection began as well as after the inspection was completed. 8.0 Inspection &Testing Procedures The LBP inspection and XRF testing were conducted by a State of Colorado accredited LBP Inspector qualified by experience, education, and training in approved LBP testing techniques. These procedures call for the visual inspection of the areas of concern and the collection of XRF readings for lead concentrations. This inspection was performed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines for lead-hazard inspections, as well as the State of Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. 19 for the Control of Lead Hazards. The EPA's 40 CFR Part 745 Final Rule (January 5, 2001) set standards for the identification of dangerous levels of lead. The standards identify when lead-based paint, lead-contaminated dust, and lead-contaminated soil are hazards. It also establishes residential dust clean-up levels(post-abatement clearance levels)and set dust and soil sampling requirements. The lead-based paint readings were collected by XRF analyzation for the purpose of determining lead concentrations as mg/rm2. 9.0 Conclusions & Recommendations Concentrations of lead in paint higher than the State of Colorado regulatory levels were not identified; therefore, no further lead safe"work practices are required when disturbing, removing or impacting the tested components. Additional testing is required if new materials are discovered or the scope of work changes. 10.0 l.Dlsciailllir 6 Limitations This limited-scope inspection does not constitute a comprehensive lead-based paint inspection or full lead- f.CLard assessment. Other areasriot tested and WI dIt•Vn3 CA3tll�outside this 3WLC of work i ULLt®• . I..Ud concentrations above the regulatory action levels. Consequently,to determine whether or not lead-based paint exists within other areas of the building, a full lead-based paint inspection must occur. 11.0 Copyright Notice DS Environmental 2018. All Rights Reserved. This document contains material protected under Federal Copyright Laws. No part of this document or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted, without the prior written consent of the author and DS Environmental. 5 Paint Read Room/Area Wall Structure Cvnd Substrate Paint Color Lead(mg/cm2) Result No.Pre-inspection Calibration u. 2 I PASS Pre-inspection Calibration -0.2 PASS Pre-inspection Calibration -0.2 I PASS : Pre-inspection calibration rc nrSS 1 Pre-inspection Calibration 10.9 I rqPASS Pre-inspection Calibration 1.0 PASS Upper Bathroom ( I ! I 67 Toilet/Shower A Wall Intact Tile Beige -0.1 Neg I +.Room i 1 I 1nnAr 11-.t k ger,es m 1 I : I t I 68 ( Vt./FLI l/Uliil!/l/111 i Toilet/Shower i_ Ceiling Intact 1 Tile Beige ! -0.3 Neg Room Upper Bathroom 69 Toilet/Shower B Floor j Intact i Tile Beige -0.3 i Neg Room Upper Bathroom 70 D Ceiling Intact , Drywall ! Eggshell , -0.2 Neg cink/Vanity Area I ! I 1 1 1 1 1 Upper Bathroom 71 C Wall Intact Drywall j Eggshell -0.2 i Neg / Sink Vanity Area I I Post-inspection calibration i 0.0 PASS Post-inspection Calibration -0.1 PASS Post-inspection Calibration 0.01PASS Post-irispeL ion C liflrat'infi i 1.0 ! PASS Post-inspection Calibration 1.0 PASS Post-inspection Calibration 1.0 PASS 7 . - Q 7.jy%I: • ' 99-r ry �Z t ; All; -.oradu 1)•lurtn>Sm 1' j (:olorado Dep imment - ;V:7,24:: of Public Health - 1 oft.i61a 11 yl(h 1 and Invironmcm 6. �; and Environment 4,'V3LEAD-BASED PAINT 3 Lead Evaluation Firm Certificate CERTIFICATION* ^ray -i}as certifies that ,i y4,.-4--: DS('onsultrn�,.Inc. Chris Lehman ' a ,, `I LEF Nod 169111 ii. Certifteathin Nod 3494N ''';..;1 -ii. '.., q' , " has met Me rcquiu•mems ret.5 7.1'0-1 C K S and 9tr oalits Conte I E �y- has met the requirements of.5-7-110-1 C.R.S.and Air Quahi tea' i'ununusm K Htd rt ut\ 1,tut-1-0, n t•al ly the d.nr t i - i Control I. n fl1 si n ireetdannn\o I)and is betels)a rtth d S { * a` �':*• i the st ate ( 1 i•b 1 •r ham l. ha ed 05.d iai n: � { {1ht•:c' ..t tLetrt.:m-,t,.:r..1 i, a ! ! 1a.. ti.; ..cue uir..ur rhe state or(nlotad0 I lnspecror' . t t,'- E "� '' @. •- Issued: November 119,?017 & a°' Mile& .0ORuM 21.2918 -sem, FApirrx: December II.21)1K ,ri'r; hspires. sugar 21.Safe - Vii; tp. rei,.r.w r�ur n.Jw..., nrnmr Fir 11 , _[ reel�c n.nor to r< ,1 t x inspector Certification. : 24948 Firm Certification: 169:18 -. 'l / ! \/ \l ,- yi ,.., . . _rim-:w _._ --...—. .— .. _ ( s 5. _ •J • it 4,_ I CF t / '-1.--- E 'd-- '7-'• LI ' 4.-t;--:: .!..4rt: V Iw n J1 ' E r. te;, y ,; 1, . (..) L - XRF Certification 9 vci DS Environmental "The trusted choice for your environmental & industrial hygiene needs." ASBESTOS !NSPErT!ON REPORT Vantage Point Lionshead Condominiums— Unit 401 508 E Lionshead Cir, Vail, Colorado I i PRESENTED TO: INSPECTED BY: PROJECT DETAILS: irmiumniommum Mr. Mike Krohn Mr. Chris Lehman DS Job Number: 18635 Rusty Pike Enterprises OS Fnvironrnental Date of inspection: October 5, /n1 R PO Box 1517 Cell: (720) 369-6609 V 4 Vail,CO 81658 I I Front Range 7555 W 10th Ave Mountains PO Box 6864 Western Slope PO Box E. Suite A,Lakewood,CO 80214 Avon,CO 81620 Aspen,CO 8: Web dsconsuitinginc.cor Direct(303)286-9094 Fax(303)986- Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Limitations of Inspection 3.0 Conclusions &Summary of Findings 4.0 Material Information 5.0 Inspector& Firm Certifications 6.0 Inspection, Sampling &Analytical Procedures 7.0 Recommendations 8.0 Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Requirements 9.0 Project Design & Project Manager Requirements 10.0 Disclaimer& Limitations 11.0 Copyright Notice APPENDIX A CERTIFICATIONS APPENDIX B LABORATORY REPORT 2 1,0 introduction Mr. Chris Lehman with DS Environmental Consulting (DS) conducted an asbestos inspection and collected bulk- samples of suspect asbestos-containing building materials within the single-family residence detailed on the cover page of this report. The purpose of the inspection was may be impacted by the renovation activities contain asbestos. 2.0 Limitations of Inspection This inspection was limited in its scope and only included specific areas and materials as defined by the client. The inspection did not constitute a full-building inspection and does not fulfill the asbestos inspection requirements for structures that are to be demolished. Thp tahlo hpin'vv, (Trr'n!p 1 fl ljct tho erre or+ :1choctrIc-rnntnining rna+prime irrrl^!rlpr in thr, crop0 of thr, inspection. It identifies the specific areas that were included in the inspection as well descriptions of the suspect asbestos-containing materials in those areas that were sampled; or materials that were assumed to contain asbestos. The suspect asbestos-containing materials listed below may be found in other areas of the building that were outside of the scope of work for this inspection and sampling. Additionally, there may be other materials in other parts of the building that contain asbestos, which were not included in the scope of this inspection and sampling. Table 1.0 I I IScope of Work J I _ ! Suspect Asbestos-Containing Mviateridis Sampled t iviateriai Locations Material 1 Knock-down textured drywall&associated • Upper bathroom walls and ceiling in the sink/vanity joint compound area Light beige stone tile with white specks and 1 Material 2 grey streaks with associated tan grout and • Upper bathroom walls, ceiling and floors in the toilet/ grey thinset shower room Material 3 1 Grey cementitious plaster board •Upper bathroom walls and ceiling in the toilet shower room,behind tile 3 3.0 Conclusions & Summary of Findings ACRONYMS ! ACM ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES CHRY—Chrysotile 1—damaged/significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM SUMMARY OF ACT—Actinolite 2—damaged friable surfacing material ACM TR 3—significantly damaged friable surfacing material ACM FiNDiNGS —Trace;>1%tcAsbestos 4—damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous material ACM ND—None-detected ACM—Asbestos Containing 5—ACM with the potential for damage 6—ACM with the potential for significant damage Material(>1%asbestos) 7—any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM i i f Sample Information I Material Information Asbestos Content I t f 3 i Sample ID: SM1-1 Description: Knock-down Drywall Texture Sample Location: Upper level bathroom I Classification: Surfacing Material ate sink/vanity area ceiling Condition: Good Quantity:^'140 ft2 Samo!e ID: SM1-? ! -.,_ _-.•a_ ._: : rridwiiLV,: Friable 1 2 Sample Location: Upper 2%CHRY er leve# bathroom Assessment Category:6 u,,• sink/vanity area north wall GReason for Assessment: S { P ' Jai:lcVJ_M -3 pntentinl for_o-n-act: High O - ! - I Sample Location: Upper level bathroom i Potential for Vibration: Low sink/vanity area west wall Potential for Air Erosion: Low Description:Joint Compound Associated w/SM1 Classification: Miscellaneous Material u'caSample ID:JC1-1 Condition: Good a Sam p;e Location: Upper level bathroom Quantity: —140 ft2 j sink/vanity area ceiling Friability: Friable G 3%CHRY Assessment Category: 6 la Sample ID:JC1-2 IReason• p Sample Location: Upper level bathroom sink/vanity area west wallPotential for Contact: High = Potential for Vibration: Low Potential for Air Erosion: Low I I I 4 Sample ID:C T M1-1 Sample Location: Upper level bathroom tnilet !shower room ceiling _ m Description: Light Beige Stone Tile with White a Sample ID:CTM1-2 Specks and Grey Streaks including Associated Tan .4 Sample Location: Upper level bathroom Grout and Grey Thinset 6 "lett sti vvc7 'c""" ea" ""Q" Classification: Miscellaneous Material 0 Z Condition:Good ND uj Sample ID: CTM1-3 O Sample Location: Upper level bathroom Quantity: "210 ft2 i toilet/shower room north wall j Friability: Non-Friable Assessment Category: No Category (Non-ACM) Sample ID: CTM1-4 Sample Location: Upper level bathroom toilet/shower room floor I 1 t E < < Sample ID: P11-1 nr Sample Location: Upper level bathroom Description: Grey Cementitious Plaster Board toilet/shower room a I ~ sot:M ed v../rTM1 i • Sample ID: P11-2 Classification: Miscellaneous Material Z1 Sample Location: Upper level bathroom Condition: Good ND u,, I toilet/shower room , Quantity: "210 ft- 1.9 0 Friability: Non-Friable ® Sample ID: PL1-3 Assessment Category: No Category(Non-ACM) I Sample Location: Upper level bathroom tnilpt/chower mom ? E 5 4.0 Material Information A Homogeneous Area (HA) means an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture. The asbestos content of the bulk-samples collected within a homogeneous area can be applied to the entire homogenous area, if they conform to the above characteristics and the regulated minimum sample quantities of each type of material have been collected and nn-'!v'orl hn Arhect' /'n nfnininn ,Antnrirli fEi rAA) is rn Yt rin! th2t rnn+nine morn then 10i -Is hpctr Any :.::5:.:1JL . ^: Lr `' ::-U:.-....:. y•. ... ... .: -v....... .:. .. � - ... ..:� material can be assumed to be an ACM, but not the contrary. 4.1 Material Friability A material can either be friable or non friable. A friable material is one that, when dry, can be pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, a non-friable material cannot. A non-friable material may become friable if its condition had deteriorated or has been impacted by forces that have rendered it friable. 4.2 Material Classifications Sampled materials are divided into one of the following three categories: • Surfacing Material: sprayed or troweled onto structural building members • Thermal System Insulation (TSI): any type of pipe, boiler, tank, or duct insulation • Miscellaneous Material: all other materials not classified in the above two categories 4.3 Material Conditions Sampled materials are placed into one of the following three categories of conditions: • Good: none to very little visible damage or deterioration • Damaged:the surface is crumbling, blistered, water-stained,gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one-quarter if the damage is Inrali7arl • Significantly Damaged: the surface is crumbling, blistered, water-stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over greater than one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed, or one-quarter if the damage is localized 4.4 Sample Quantities DS collected at least the minimum number of samples from each homogeneous area necessary to meet all regulatory requirements for the quantity of material to be disturbed in the scope of work as defined by the client. The quantities listed in this report are approximate and on-site verification of the exact quantity of each material is required for permitting, estimating and billing purposes. The following outlines the minimum sample quantities required per homogeneous area: • Surfacing Materials: up to 1,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of three (3) samples; between 1,000 ft2 and 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of five (5) samples; over 5,000 ft2 of material requires a minimum of seven (7) samples; one (1) sample of each patch • Thermal System insulation (ISI): each homogeneous area requires a minimum of three (3) samples; at least one (1) sample must be collected from each patch; and collect enough samples sufficient to adequately assess the material and determine the asbestos content for TSI fittings such as pipe elbows fir T'e which a minimuum of (21 samples of each _. rte__:_�• � =:.: two =�..:� 6 • Miscellaneous Materials: collect enough samples sufficient to determine the asbestos content with a minimum of two (2) samples of each 4.5 Materials Reporting"i RACE' Results Any sample reporting a "TRACE" amount of asbestos shall be considered to contain greater than 1% asbestos unless it is further analyzed utilizing the point-count method and verified to be less than or equal to 1% asbestos content, and therefore not an ACM= TRACE does not mean it contains less than or molal to 1%e 4.6 Materials Containing 1%Asbestos or Less Materials containing less than or equal to 1%asbestos are not regulated by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Regulation 8, Part B — Asbestos. However, all demolition/abatement activities should be performed following the applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, the appropriate asbestos training for the type of material being removed/disturbed as well as having a properly trained supervisor onsite, using wet removal methods, wearing adequate nersonal nrotecctive equipment (HFPA-filtered particulate respirators), medical surveillance of workers, personal-exposure air monitoring, area air monitoring in occupied buildings, etc. There may also be landfill disposal requirements for these materials, depending on the facility. DS recommends that all demolition/renovation projects involving the disturbance of any amount of asbestos be subjected to post- work visual inspections and a final clearance air testing by a CON-lb-certified Asbestos Air monitoring Specialist (AMS) after the work has been completed, but before any containments are dismantled, the contractor demobilizes, and the area is reoccupied. 4.7 Overspray Any surfacing material indicated in this report also includes any associated overspray of that material, e.g., under carpet, above suspended ceilings, on studs and structural members, etc. 5.0 Inspector & Firm Certifications The inspection detailed within this report was conducted by Mr. Chris Lehman with DS. DS is a CDPHE certified Asbestos Consulting Firm, Registration No. 14912. Mr. Lehman is a CDPHE certified Building Inspector; having certification number 14348 (see Appendix A for certificates). L A i..._ ..�:..... C.. 1: G li.. i;;s:_...1 n....._4+;,1......... V.�YI Ui�J�,%\:.%L�Vi�� .101I 1141i1'b . Mi U{/I yU I4I is Vv\..MMU LJ 6.1. Inspection Procedures The asbestos inspection detailed in this report was conducted by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CDPHE certified asbestos Building Inspector. The inspection procedures included identifying and sampling suspect ACM within the pre-defined areas that were within the scope of work, submitting samples to an accredited laboratory for analysis,classifying the materials and assessing their condition,and compiling a final report detailing the inspection and the analytical results of the bulk-samples. 6.2 Sampling Procedures Statistically random hulk-samples representative of the suspect ACM of each homogeneous area were collected according to the guidelines published in the Environmental Protection Agency's October 1985 publication, "Asbestos in Building: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials", commonly known as the "Pink Book." 7 • DS has collected the appropriate number of bulk-samples to meet all regulatory requirements for the classification and quantity of each homogeneous area. All reasonable efforts were made to identify homogeneous areas and to sample or assume suspect materials. Destructive investigation was conducted whenever teasibie, and every effort was made to locate and quantify suspect ACM within the scope of work. Any material not identified and sampled in this report shall be assumed to be an ACM or shall be sampled by an EPA-trained and CDPHE-certified inspector and submitted for analysis. 6.3 Analytical Procedures All asbestos bulk-samples were analyzed by a third party, National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)for asbestos content per CDPHE Regulation 8 (see Appendix is for laboratory report). 7.0 Recommendations The asbestos inspection detailed in this report did identify ACM(s);therefore, professional abatement activities are required to remove or disturb the above-referenced asbestos-containing materials. 8.0 Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Requirements If ACM is to be removed or disturbed in a single-family residence, and the total quantity exceeds any of the ra... latr,ry trigger I..vals of cn li r F+ rm pivs, ] f ft2 nn flthn sitrfaces,nr cs-quivalent..F-, 55 -.11.. drum, a CDPHE-certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC) is required to perform the work. The regulatory trigger levels within a commercial building are 260 linear ft. on pipes, 160 ft2 on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55-gallon drum. In addition,formal notification to CDPHE prior to the abatement of ACM as well as air monitoring,visual inspections, and final air clearances by a CDPHE-certified Asbestos AMS is required. DS can provide the client or building owner with a proposal for project design, abatement oversight and air monitoring upon request. CDPHE regulations allow for the demolition of a building that contains non-friable asbestos-containing materials, such as caulking, mastic or resilient floor tiles. However, demolition must be completed without causing the non-friable ACM to be rendered friable. Burning a building with any ACM is prohibited. Operations such as sanding, cutting, crushing, grinding, pneumatic jacking, etc. of ACM are not permitted. Recycling of building materials such as concrete, metal, or wood that are bonded or contaminated with ACM, e.g. glue, caulking, or mastic is also prohibited. If any of the non-friable asbestos containing materials are to be recycled and rendered friable after demolition (Le. crushing mastic-coated concrete), these materials must be abated of all ACM prior to shipping offsite for recycling. OSHA regulations regarding occupational exposure during demolition activities is still mandatory. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires that workers performing construction-related activities be protected from asbestos fibers in excess of the permissible exposure limit of 0.1 f/cc of air. Contractors are must comply with applicable provisions of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 during demolition and renovation activities. These OSHA provisions include, blit are not limited tn_ PPF and respirators, personnel training, personal-exposure air monitoring, employee medical surveillance, wet removal methods, signage for regulated areas, etc. 8 9.0 Project Design & Project Manager Requirements DS can provide an Asbestos Abatement Project Design as well as fulfill the Colorado Asbestos Abatement Project Manager requirements for any asbestos abatement project, as applicable below. Project Design An abatement Project Design is an accurate and detailed scope of work, which includes project specifications and procedures, containment design/equipment placement, and descriptions of engineering controls and work practices for an asbestos abatement project or response action that is required by CDPHE Regulation Number R, Part B-Asbestos (Rea_ R)on large asbestos abatement prniects_ Prior to the start of any asbestos abatement project in a non-school building, where the amount of asbestos-containing material (ACM) to be removed or disturbed exceeds 1,000 linear feet on pipes, or 3,000 square feet on surfaces, or in a school building in which the amount of friable ACM to be abated exceeds 3 linear feet on pipes, or 3 square feet on surfaces, a written Project Design must be developed by a State of Colorado certified Project Designer in accordance with subsection IV.G.7 of Regulation 8. A signed copy shall be posted on-site prior to commencing any abatement activities, shall be available on-site at all times, and shall remain onsite until final air clearances have been completed by a State of Colorado-certified Air Monitoring Specialist (AFM), Project Manager A Project Manager shall be used on all asbestos abatement projects in which the amount of friable asbestos- containing material to be abated exceeds 1,000 linear feet on pipes, or 3,000 square feet on other surfaces per CDPHE Regulation Number 8, Part B — Section iii.B.D. An asbestos Project Manager on an abatement project shall be responsible for assessing that the project is conducted in accordance with Regulation 8, assessing that the Project Design is followed, assessing that the abatement project is cleared in accordance with Regulation 8, assessing that the asbestos waste generated on the project is properly manifested and disposed of in accordance with Regulation 8, and communicating these assessments to the building owner or GAC. Project Managers must have proof of Colorado certification as an asbestos Project Designer and Air Monitoring Specialist in accordance with Section II of CDPHE Regulation 8 as well as a minimum of one(1)year of experience supervising,overseeing or monitoring asbestos abatement projects. A 4-year college degree in industrial hygiene, a degree in environmental health with a major concentration in industrial hygiene, or the possession of a certified industrial hygienist (CIH) certificate given by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH) may be substituted for the Colorado asbestus Air Monitoring Specialist certification, The GAC shall notify the building owner during the bid process as to whether a Project Manager is required. Project Managers shall be independent of the asbestos abatement contractor and work strictly on behalf of the building owner to the extent feasible unless the abatement is being performed in-house. Project Managers must sign the original copy of the abatement permit for the permit to be valid, and before any abatement can take place. 10.0 Disclaimer uI tticrIJ The activities outlined in this report were conducted in a manner consistent with a level of care and expertise exercised by members of the environmental consulting and industrial hygiene profession. All activities were performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations as well as generally accepted standards and professional practice. No warranty is either expressed or implied. DS assumes no responsibility or liability for error in public information utilized, statements from sources other than DS, or developments resulting from situations outside the scope of work for this project. 9 The details provided within this report outline the inspection activities on the date(s) indicated and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. The laboratory results contained in this report apply specifically to the materials in which bulk-samples were collected. The results do not include or apply to any other materials within the structure that were not sampled but may contain asbestos; including materials that may be hidden or inaccessible. Additional inspection and bulk-sampling activities by a certified inspector would be required to determine whether any other materials contain asbestos. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by the DS's client,with specific application to their project as discussed in the scope of work. The information contained in this report is intended as supplementary material for abatement design and is not to be used as the sole means to develop the scope of abatement activities, bidding or billing purposes. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. DS can provide a full scope of work for abatement upon request. DS does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories nr other third parties conniving information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. 11.0 Copyright Notice © DS Environmental 2018. All Rights Reserved. This document contains material protected under Federal Copyright Laws. No part of this document or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted, without the prior written consent of the author and DS Environmental. 10 ir,,,A., ,,,vi,,;. 7..,,,,I\7,t,,,,,,,,\\rirN, flfwa.:—"L'I.;14;.4k47; i"11.:1',.:, ,...1:,-1°,„,.....;", ,, ,,, ,_:. , -1,,or,:,-,..x-:., •••;-7.71, NI ,„ t, '\4 /•:‘,k,..\,- 4.1 (..: •gt-ii;;`4 k r"'''',4% '': r.• •-••.• :-4-'7 V. .. . . .:;;;I'Z'•-• '''(: r- -5 7-, : .. t le: kfexv ,.7.- Colorado Departtimn '4•VN:-:1' ''. or NI&ticaltl: .19. ; and tin ironment 11': - ; '":' '1-;;1',/ ,;.: E., "..4 :a ? g.1 , • - AsalLsit)ti •-. :=.,...,'g , CERTIFICATION* x, -7:7. ,1 1 IV 0 'VII 7:rl ',i: 1' ,.r.' CA 'W 11)1,CvIllti,171,11 n ,,,,,i,.••„ John C Lehman lo,,,..- i 01 . 0 ,-F.g- i-'...." .•... " :. = zr, CA 'Z.-Ol. ' ',-.11 -::: , V Certification NO.:1434% ?. \ l',11. '_::.% : :_.' ..1...b.,,,,t.R.,..1,,,,,Ih,:”}1,,,,04:d,.....,p1.,,, _ . . =' , — • .2 ) •... -..::::. -:-:,I , E es •: Building Inspector* :7„,,,, ;-..; ,, "I ,---if 1,11Cli' 11111,IA 2IIIN , ...Ne . _ , ...z. I Wire, JIth 13.2019 _ . • ; PR, , ,,.6..;;;•.'`.. ' ''.i 4 .4, 4 ::,...;;;:1,-„;.21, •-•• •• , .F., E7 T-,. ,•,,,,,,, ,,: ! .., i ( . 2. .,. ,...„.:.,„ f , t:6;,. '-' - —--4 74t. N- ;<•;::::74-.\....;-',....r, ,Ite?". '...;., . .,.; ., ,, , -,-.'',I'r, s•- .-.--{'14'''Y''''' -i '•.N., 1,—, •' '-'.',,, 4"AL - -'--- ''::„.0::,,,,,,,,i i 'ii;„-.‘4,2'1/1- '::.'S'',f1;-•.,,,;',...::'-'7.:,'":-.•-I ..'„'' ,. , v,t..*:.:),:.,.:4,;.-:-.1::.,4,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-;-0:4,,,r;,..:::-.:::,•c•-•;,,:-.:,.,,,i,,-, ,..24-:..... Inspector Certification: 14348 I Firm Certification: 14912 12 EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: ::: 11 r ID: 2 EMSL 1010 Yuma Street Denver,CO 80204 Tel/Fax:(303)740-5700 1(303)741-1400 Customer PO: http.//www.EMSL.com/denverlab@emsl.com l Project ID: J Attention: DS Group Phone: (303)286-9094 DS Environmental Fax: 7555 W 10th Ave Received Date: 10/05/2018 5:55 PM i Suite A Analysis Date: 10/08/2016 i Lakewood, CO 80214 Collected Date: I Project: 508 E Lionshead Cr.#401,Vail, CO Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos 5.1rr:j:l:: : usbriptir3. :=ppcilrancu i.F ibroli i Noir-Fibrous iu :ape SM1-1-Texture 1 Tan/White 20%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 80%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0001 Heterogeneous inseparable paint i coating layer included in analysis SM1-1-Texture 2 White 20%Ca Carbonate 2%Chrysotile Non-Fibrous 78%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0001A Heterogeneous Inseparable paint/coating layer included in analysis SM1-2-Texture 1 Tan/White 20%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 80%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0002 Heterogeneous Inseparable paint/coating layer included in analysis SM1-2-Texture 2 White 20%Ca Carbonate 2%Chrysotile Non-Fibrous 78%Non-fibrous(Other, 221808069-0002A Heterogeneous inseparable paint/coating layer included in analysis SM1-3-Texture 1 White 20%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 80%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-00.03 Homogeneous Inseparable paint/coating layer included in analysis SM1-3-Texture 2 White 98%Non-fibrous(Other) 2%Chrysotile Non-Fibrous 221808069-0003A Homogeneous insvnarahin mini/rnniinn to ver innb,ded in,analvsic JC1-1-Joint Compound White 20%Ca Carbonate 2%Chrysotile 1 Non-Fibrous 78%Non-fibrous(Other) Homogeneous 221808069-0004 .1e1-1-Tan_eTan 98%Cellulose 2%Non-fibrous(Other) None Detected Fibrous 221008050-00040 Homogeneous JC1-1-Joint Compound White 20%Ca Carbonate 3%Chrysotile 2 Non-Fibrous 77%Non-fibrous(Other) Homogeneous 221808069-00048 JC1-1-Drywall BrownAMl to 15%Cellulose 70%Gypsum None Detected Fibrous 15%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0004c Homogeneous 7x•1_7 Texture 1 1Mhitc. 150A Cn earhnn-te Alone 17.1f-te terl Non-Fibrous 85%Non-fibrous(Other) 221008069-0005 Homogeneous Inseparable paint/coating layer included in analysis JC-1-2-Texture 2 White 98%Non-fibrous(Other) 2%Chrysotile Non-Fih_rn_:;c_ 221808069-D005A Homogeneous Inseparable paint/coating layer included in anal sis JC 1-2-Drywall Brown/White 15%Cellulose 65%Gypsum None Detected Fibrous 20%Non-fibrous(Other) -onannr na. ncn Homogeneous t Initial report from:10/08/2018 17:29:24 , ( 4 S E__PLM 0003_000/- 1.78 Printed: 10/8/2018 3:29 PM Page 1 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. I EMSL Order: ::: 69 M.• Customer ID: ,.11►�t9L. 1010 Yuma Street Denver,CO 80204 Customer PO: _ Tei/Fax:(303)740-5700%(3031 741-1400 .M h tp ilww^.v.EMSI_corn I denverlab@emsl.com ( Project ID: ) Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non-Asbestos Asbestos Sample Description Appearance %Fibrous %Non-Fibrous %Type CTM1-1-Ceramic Tile White 40%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 60%Non-fibrous(Other) 221-1C-6,,S.63- 5 :..1,.: ......, CTM1-1-Grout Tan 10%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 90%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0006A Homogeneous CTM1-1-Thinset Gray 10%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 90%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0006B Homogeneous CTM1-2-Ceramic Tile White 40%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 60%Non-fibrous(Other) 221608069-0007 Homogeneous CTM1-2-Grout Tan 10%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 90%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0007A Homogeneous CTM1-2-Thinset Gray 5%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 95%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0007B Homogeneous CTM1-3-Cerarnic Tile White 40%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 60%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0008 Homogeneous CTM1_3_crou. Ton :c%1Ca Cnrbonn.o None Detected - - Non-Fibrous 85%Non-fibrous(Other) 221908069-0008A Homogeneous CTM 1-4-Ceramic Tile White 100%Non-fibrous(Other) None Detected Non-Fibrous 221608069-No9 Homogeneous CTM1-4-Grout Tan 100%Non-fibrous(Other) None Detected Non-Fibrous 221805069-0009A Homogeneous CTM1-4-Thinset Gray 100%Non-fibrous(Other) None Detected Non-Fibrous 221808069-00098 Homogeneous PL1-1 Gray 5%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 95%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0010 Homogeneous Non-Fibrous 95%Non-fibrous(Other) 221808069-0011 Homogeneous PL1-3 Gray 5%Ca Carbonate None Detected Non-Fibrous 95%Non-fibrous(Other) 221805069-0012 Hornooeneou3 ( l `} ( c � (\__. - Analyst(s) �, l ��- a Cassandra Schorzman(18) Melanie Rech,Laboratory Director or rlther 4nnrrrup-1 Cinnafnm Molly:i ins iii ,, _.v- - EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR(previously EPA 600/M4-82-020"Interim Method"),but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993("final")version of the method.This report relates only to the samples reported above,and may not be reproduced,except in full,without 11 .written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibilityfor sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All 1.samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted,This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification,approval,or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical,Inc.Denver,CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0 f .- -- — i li littai repai. troll(:i iiiiidi2ii 10 1(:29:24 <` _ Printed:10/812018 3:29 PM Page 2 of 2