Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-01-20 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1987 7:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Consent Agenda A. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1987, second reading, an ordinance imposing zoning districts on parcels of property in the recently reannexed West Vail area including but not limited to Vail Heights, Vail das Schone Filings No. 1 and No. 2 and Vail Ridge subdivisions as well as certain unplatted parcels. B. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1987, second reading, an ordinance zoning certain parcels of property legally described as a resubdivision of Tract D, a resubdivision of Vail das Schone, Filing No. 1, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, heretofore annexed to the Town of Vail, designating said zoning districts for the annexed property; setting forth details relating thereto; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the annexed property. C. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1987, second reading, an ordinance rezoning certain parcels of property described as Parcel B and Parcel C, a resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17, Block 7, Vail Village, First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado; designating said zoning districts for the subject property; setting forth details relating thereto; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the subject property. 2. Colorado Department of Highways Presentation and Public Meeting regarding the I-70 West Corridor Study 3. Total Beauty Centre Sign Variance Request CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 4. Town Manager's Report 5. Adjournment VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1987 7:30 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. Consent Agenda Rick Pylman A. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1987, second reading, pertaining to zoning for Vail das Schone, Vail Heights, and Vail Ridge area of West Vail Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1987, on second reading. Background Rationale: Zoning proposed is identical to the zoning in place prior to the deannexation of this area with two exceptions: 1) Parcel A of Tract D (adjacent to the Texaco Station), and 2) the Ulbrich parcel. These parcels are to be zoned under separate action. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1987, on second reading. Rick Pylman B. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1987, second reading, to zone Parcel A west of the Texaco Station Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1987, on second reading. Background Rationale: The Wend Group Partnership has received approval from the PEC for minor subdivision and zoning of Tract D as commercial. Town Council approval is required for the zoning request. Tract D is located just west of the West Vail Texaco Station. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1987, on second reading. Rick Pylman C. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1987, second reading, a request to rezone two lots in Vail Village First Filing tot create one primary/secondary lot and two single family lots Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1987, on second reading. Background Rationale: The applicant has applied for and received conditional approval for subdivision and zoning of Lots 14 and 18, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing to create three lots, one primary and two single family. The zoning request requires final approval by the Town Council. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1987, on second reading. 7:40 2. Colorado Department of Highways Presentation and Public Stan Berryman Meeting regarding the I-70 West Corridor Study Action Requested of Council: None. Presentation by Colorado Dept. of Highways personnel to update the Town Council and receive public input regarding the I-70 West Corridor study. Background Rationale: Since June, 1986, the Colorado Dept. of Highways, in conjunction with local governments, has been studying the I-70 west corridor from the Clear Creek County line to the Eagle County Airport to determine possible short-term and long-term transportation solutions for recreational related transportation impacts. A transportation computer model has been developed to estimate future travel. The Highway Dept. would like to receive Council and public input regarding desired transportation improvements and solutions to the corridor. 8:10 3. Total Beauty Centre Sign Variance Request Kristan Pritz Action Requested of Council: Review the sign variance request and determine if the variance should be approved or denied. Background Rationale: Total Beauty Centre is located on the second floor above Alpine Gold in Vail Village Inn Phase II. The applicant is requesting to have three signs (two on the awning and one wooden sign in the covered entry) with a total square footage of 7.3 sq. ft. Under the sign code, a second story business is allowed one sign of 3 sq. ft. at the entry point into the building. The applicant is requesting two additional signs beyond the one sign that is allowed as well as an additional 4.3 sq. ft. of signage for the business. On January 7, 1987, the Design Review Board recommended to Town Council to approve the two signs on the awning but to deny the wooden sign. The vote was 5-0 in support of the motion. The variance for the awning was considered reasonable as Total Beauty has a visibility problem due to: 1) a second floor location, 2) the entrance is'located on the second tier of shops, and 3) a covered walkway blocks the visibility of the awning signage and entry, particularly from East Meadow Drive. Staff Recommendation: The staff supports the variance for the awning and recommends denial of the request for the additional wooden sign in the covered entry way. At this time, the applicant is requesting approval for the entire variance. For this reason, staff must recommend denial of the proposal as a whole. Please note that the Council may approve the application "subject to such modifications as it deems necessary to accomplish the purpose of this title." Section 16.36.080 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 4. Town Manager's Report 5. Adjournment -2- ORDINANCE NO. 3 Series of 1987 AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING ZONING DISTRICTS ON PARCELS OF PROPERTY IN THE RECENTLY RE-ANNEXED WEST VAIL AREA INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO VAIL HEIGHTS, VAIL DAS SCHONE FILINGS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 AND VAIL RIDGE SUBDIVISIONS AS WELL AS CERTAIN UNPLATTED PARCELS WHEREAS, The Town of Vail, Colorado recently re-annexed a portion of the West Vail area, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, effective on October 29, 1986 as depicted in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Chapter 18.68 of the Vail Municipal code sets forth procedures for the imposition of zoning districts and recently annexed areas; and WHEREAS, Section 31-12-115 (S) CRS, 1973, as amended, requires the Town to bring newly annexed areas under a zoning ordinance within 90 days after the effective date of annexation; and WHEREAS, whereas, the Town of Vail and John Ulbrich have entered into an agreement extending the time period within which zoning must be applied to 180 days (agreement dated June 16, 1986); and WHEREAS, there is an application from the property owner of a portion of Tract D, Vail das Schone Filing No. 1 for a minor subdivision and rezoning which shall remove said parcel from the jurisdiction of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail has considered the zoning to be imposed on the re-annexed area at a public hearing and has made a recommendation to the Town Council to adopt zoning as proposed in this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it is in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare to so zone said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Procedures Fulfilled, The procedures for the determination of the zoning districts to be imposed on the recently re-annexed West Vail area as set forth in Chapter 18.68 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled. Section 2. A part of Tract D, Vail das Schone Filing #1 as generally shown on the attached Exhibit A shall be exempt from this ordinance. Section 3. Lot 21, Section 14, an unplatted parcel known as the Ulbrich property as shown on the attached Exhibit A shall also be exempt from the jurisdiction of this ordinance. Section 4. As provided in Section 18.080.030 of the Vail Municipal Code, the Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to properly modify and amend the official zoning map to indicate the zoning specified herein. Section 5. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 6. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 7. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS 6th DAY OF January 1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 6th day of January , 1987 at'7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 6th day of January 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1 Series of 1987 AN ORDINANCE ZONING CERTAIN PARCELS OF PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT D, A RESUBDIVISION OF VAIL DAS SCHONE, FILING NO. 1, TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE TOWN OF VAIL, DESIGNATING SAID ZONING DISTRICTS FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; SETTING FORTH DETAILS RELATING THERETO; AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IN RELATION TO THE ANNEXED PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the property to be zoned hereby has been recently annexed to the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has considered the appropriate zoning for the recently annexed property and has unanimously recommended that the Town Council zone the parcel Commercial Core III; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the public interest to zone said annexed property as soon as possible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of zoning districts for property recently annexed to the Town of Vail have been fulfilled, and the Town Council hereby received the report of recommendation of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending the zoning of the annexed property. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.68.070 of the Vail Municipal Code, a parcel of property described as a resubdivision of Tract D, a resubdivision of Vail das Schone Filing No. 1, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado is rezoned as Commercial Core III (CCIII). Section 3. As provided in the ordinances of the Town of Vail, the zoning administrator is hereby directed to modify and amend the official zoning map to include the zoning specified in Section Two (2) above. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS 6th DAY OF January 1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 6th day of January 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 6th day of January 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2 Series of 1987 AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PARCELS OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL B AND PARCEL C, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 14 AND 17, BLOCK 7, VAIL VILLAGE, FIRST FILING, TOWN OF VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO; DESIGNATING SAID ZONING DISTRICTS FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; SETTING FORTH DETAILS RELATING THERETO; AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IN RELATION TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHEREAS, the property to be rezoned hereby lies within the jurisdiction of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has considered the appropriate zoning for the subject property and unanimously recommended to the Town Council rezone Parcels B and C Single Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the public interest to zone said property Single Family Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of rezoning property have been fulfilled, and that the Town Council hereby receives the report of the recommendation of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending the rezoning of the subject property. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.66.100 of the Vail Municipal Code, parcels of property described as Parcel B and Parcel C, a resubdivison of Lots 14 and 17, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, are rezoned to Single Family Resident.ial (SFR). Section 3. As provided in the ordinances of the Town of Vail, the zoning administrator is hereby directed to modify and amend the official zoning map to include the zoning specified in Section Two (2) above. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS 6th DAY OF January 1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 6th day of January , 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 6th day of January 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1987. Paul R. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: r a, ,r TO: Design Review Board FROM: Community Development Department DATE: December 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Sign variance request for the Total Beauty Centre APPLICANT: Total Beauty Centre: Brenda Le Grange I. REQUEST On November 19, 1986 the applicant tabled the variance until the December 17, 1986 meeting. The request has. not been changed from the original proposal. In general, members favored the variance for the awning but did not support the additional sign in the covered walkway off of Meadow Drive. Total Beauty Centre is in Phase I & II of Vail Village Inn. The business is located on the second floor above Alpine Gold. To reach Total Beauty, a pedestrian enters off of East Meadow Drive, passes through an outside covered stairway between Alpine Gold and Vail Village Inn Sports, and goes through a common door at the top of the stairway. The applicant is requesting variances from the following section of the Town of Vail sign code: Section 16.20.090 Projecting and Hanging Signs--Individual business within a multi-tenant building. I. Special Provisions 3. In a case where a business or organization located above or below street level fronts directly onto an exterior balcony, deck, walkway or stairway which is utilized as the business' own entrance and for unrestricted public access and use, the allowable sign area for any sign to be located at the building level shall be based upon the portion of the business frontage which abuts directly upon the balcony deck, walkway or stairway with a maximum size allowed not to exceed 5 square feet. A sign of a maximum area of 3 square feet shall be allowed for businesses having insufficient frontage The applicant is requesting approval for the following signs: 1. A black and white awning which has one sign on the front of the awning and one on the side. Side signage: 8" x 2' = 1.3 sq ft Front signage: 1' x 3' = 3.0 sq ft 2. A hanging black and white wooden sign located in the covered walkway leading up to the entrance. This sign is 1'x 3' = 3 sq ft. At this time, Total Beauty Centre has three signs (two on the awning) with a total square footage of 7.3 square feet. Under the sign code, a second story business is allowed 3 square feet at the entry point into the building. Therefore, the applicant is requesting two additional signs beyond the one sign that is allowed as well as an additional 4.3 square feet of signage for the business. The applicant has submitted the following statement as to why she feels the sign variance is warranted: "Total Beauty Centre has over the past 5 years had 2 entrances --our main entrance being-where Goods' main entrance is now and our back entrance was just west of Alpenrose' back patio. We now have only one entrance--that being the back entrance which is now our main entrance. The visibility to the entrance is difficult, having to walk under a covered walkway and then upstairs. The signage used now is without a doubt a lot more tasteful than what was originally being used--a bright yellow and green sun shaped sign also larger than what we have now. The old sign was in a more strategic position--on the front corner of the building. We have now moved our new sign further back off the street. With regard to the awning, we basically replaced the old Polo colours--green with orange stripes--with our colours--black and white. The sign next to our entrance was removed when the new awning was installed. Both the sign and awning have our logo and are a vast improvement to what was previously there. As we have decreased the signage and done a more subtle and tasteful job on our new signs, I am sure you will agree and thus approve the new sign and awning." II. FINDINGS AND STAFF RESPONSES Before the board acts on a variance application, the applicant must prove physical hardship and the board must find that: A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, topoqraphy, veqetation, siqn structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent riaht-of-way which would substantiallv restrict the effectiveness of the siqn in question; provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions are unique to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention, and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises. Staff Response: Total Beauty Centre has a visibility problem due to several factors: 1) The salon is located on the second floor of the -2- building, 2) the entrance is located off East Meadow Drive on the second (or rear) tier of shops, and 3) in order to get to Total Beauty Centre, you must walk through a covered walkway which blocks the visibility of the awning signage and entry. Staff believes that this is a special circumstance which warrants some additional signage to identify the business. Our opinion is that the awning signage which includes one sign of 1.3 square feet and one sign of 3 square feet is warranted. We do not feel that it is necessary for Total Beauty Centre to have a separate sign at the entrance to the covered walkway off East Meadow Drive. If Total Beauty Centre is allowed this sign, then all the businesses on the second tier of shops in the Vail Village Inn commercial area should be allowed to have a sign at this entrance. To allow the approximate ten retail spaces to have signs at this entrance would create unnecessary sign clutter. For this reason, it is felt that a variance is warranted for the awning signage, but not for the hanging sign. B. That special circumstances were not created by the applicant or anyone in privy to the applicant: Special circumstances were not created by the applicant. C. That the qrantinq of the variance will be in qeneral harmony with the purposes of this title, and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residinq or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general. Staff Response: Generally, the proposed signage is in harmony with the purposes of this title which state in Section 16.16.010, that "sign location, configuration, design, materials and colors should be harmonious with the majestic mountain setting and the alpine village scale of the town." Staff agrees that the signage is very tastefully done, however there is concern with the 3 square foot sign being located in the covered entry way into the second level of shops. Our opinion is that signage should be located in the area of the business and should not be scattered throughout a project to direct a pedestrian to the business. A variance is warranted for the awning, which is a request that will still be in compliance with the sign code in the sense that the signage is located at the entrance to the shop. Staff cannot support the request for the sign in the covered entry way of the Vail Village Inn Phase II commercial area. -3- D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this title any more than is required to identify the applicant's business or use. Staff Response: In respect to the awning, it is felt that the requested signage is necessary to identify the applicant's business. However, the sign in the covered entryway does go beyond the amount of signage that is really necessary to identify the business. III. Such other factors and criteria as the Design Review Board deems applicable to the proposed-variance. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff supports the variance for the awning, however, we are unable to support the request for the additional sign in the covered entryway. For this reason, the staff recommends denial of the variance request. We would recommend to the applicant that a joint use directory be placed adjacent to the covered entryway up to the second level of shops at Vail Village Inn to direct pedestrians into this area. The purpose of this type of sign is "to list all tenants within a multi-tenant building and to guide the pedestrian to an individual tenant within the building." (Section 16.20.040) This approach to the visibility problems for the businesses on the second level of the Vail Village Inn commercial area will provide additional signage for all the shops on the second level in a manner that will not create sign clutter. The staff prefers this approach to the alternative of allowing many of these businesses to locate individual signs out on the East Meadow Drive entryway. -4- I! OT 0 y br. PIN B CAP BASEMENT WALL PROPERTY LINE IS ON •'~w, ! ` t L.9.16827 N. FACE OF BASEMENT WI rr S80°22x22"E WALL I. d pL' 1 125.5 g' oyv A ti 9 s GCE. ',~l f Mti -OVERHANG n 17'2 PIN B CAP L. S. 16827 6,y• _ V, pti u 1]s N S09°3000"W A PINB CAP a ,50' O g9 L.S. 161121 o 6 12.54 rv i N82°O6 4fi E TWO STORY FRAME o o\ PIN B CAP L.S. 16827 W 49 48 AND STUCCO OVERHANG 4.5 12 Tc Id J +~O BUILDING j,~~ I /,OVERHANG s. \ l S N 0.0 GC 29 J' a J OVERNANGL_ TWO STORY FRAME AND y ~`Vo VILLAGE INN PLAZA 1.d a Im ti _ W G.C.E. ,\6 6?/p• O 45 0' BUILD NG p CONDOMINIUMS STUCCO r - 02 B~> O% F- \q5 68 OZ OVERHANG 19.0' F _D "m. u 6i 6b G.C.E. l•. 13.2 0. N •i0 UTILITY 7'1 n \52 2q4 ENCLOSURE GC.E. ' b-L I O G.C.E. 9.4 N PATIO L.C.E. OVERHANG d~ \ •W,6.44- / \ ,A4.! UNIT 5 iANG EASEME T,_, \\O GTax6~D PATIO OO' E, 12.31 t L.C.E. _ +p U ~ ( UNIT S N 1S J E m 359 N rv O I ~2 TWO STORY FRAME> Z. of M `c AND STUCCO ' > OUTLINE OF BUILDING w \\T. 0, 9 BUILDING n 9 AT GRADE (TyP.I 36 O PIN B CAP Z c 31 SEE SHEET 3 FOR PLAZA L.S. 16027 FT 3 FOR Z = TWO STORY FRAME 4 < T I m v m, Np mn \ AREA DETAILS ETAILS m\O9 Oc AND STUCCO ]6 my E\ *O £ BUILDING S c c Tj O 2.9 N OCAP L.S. 16827 w• „ ]p y U TWO STORY FRAME m•\O~ o' G.C.E.m' D \O' ~ + N. AND STUCCO 6 m. 00°W .9' i A. 0 y6, "oA-G ` BUILDING W 2.9 3 15.8 2 3 I m 6 16 % G. 22 0• , ' v 6 o 0. Oo 2 77.6 \v/ 5+ P4T10 \ r^ O. m M \O' T LCE UNIT 5 DECK J m O. .C O 19.7' .4. y ,0 13.7'' \7, 10f E , \9 6 7.0 G 1C4"\ ,N. g, m '.5 I i m•l10 m. __'S 10 PIN BCAP \0 8 17_ L.S.16827 Calculated: R=545.88 QJ 61P R=545.88' C ED 2°35'00"W 556 /POINT OF BEGNNING k SOUTHWEST L = 154.13 = 16°00 3J y\ IN C NISENCRE X TE 106.29' S82o CORNER LOT 0 A=16°10'39 I L =152 51' \ 3sbO"E T= 77.58' Ch =N89°24.7 ~E THIS AREA SUBJECT TO PIN BCAP Ch=S89°1940"W 152.02' R.O.W. PERMIT RECORDED L.S. 16827 153.62' IN BOOK 390 AT PAGE 746 EAST MEADOW DRIVE (401) dq:n ~!;(~r~Tj•:~ti 1 i mg 5'. 'n ~ • = as rAl".• 'mac ~ ~ b.'t` _ • z iH'~' 7i3;c l; . sue/ 4 ~r~!~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ."x 1 _ IN i p _ S t fAit. s =a i A' 1t - +t ,~2?r TEXAS TOWNHOUSE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION RECD JAN 1 5 1987 Vail, Colorado c/o 650 S. Cherry St., Suite 1000 Denver, Colorado 80222 (303) 321-1000 January 8, 1987 Mr. Larry A. Esquith Town Attorney Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Larry: You and I have been working away at the Texas Townhouse parking situation for a number of years and I would. like to convey my appreciation to you for being an excellent city attorney, mediator, and facilitator in finalizing this matter for us all. We are appreciative for the Town's approach, although I know their preference is not to convey property. I honestly feel that it is in everyone's best interest that the matter was resolved in the fashion that it was. I will talk with Peter Patton in order to resolve the signage matter. I hope you had a very pleasant holiday season and I look forward to seeing you in Vail soon again. Persona egards, Peyt Perry PFP/vw