Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-10 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 2:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Town of Vail Capital Projects Discussion 2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 3. Information Update 4. Other 5. Executive Session - Land Negotiations for Interchange Modifications VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 1. Town of Vail Capital Projects Discussion Charlie Wick Action Requested of Council: Council direction needed concerning short-term project and long-term project priority lists. Backqround Rationale: At the March 3, 1987 Council Work Session, Council agreed to proceed with the tentative process agenda concerning TOV capital projects. This will be a long session to discuss Council policy on criteria, what projects to focus on, and what further study is needed. Staff Recommendation: Provide policy direction for staff on capital projects. 4:00 2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Peter Patten 4:10 3. Information Update Ron Phillips 4:15 4. Other 4:20 5. Executive Session - Land Negotiations for Interchange Modifications TO: Ron Phillips FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 3, 1987 RE: Preliminary recommendations on how to proceed with further evaluation of the Congress Hall proposal The staff has had an opportunity to consult a number of nationally known consulting firms following Tuesday's discussion of the Congress Hall proposal. The purpose of these contacts were to seek advice from experts on how to proceed with our evaluation of the Congress Hall proposal. It was a consensus of the people we contacted that the basic fundamental approach to evaluating a facility of this nature involves three steps. These include: Market Feasibility Economic/Financial Assessment Site/Programmatic Analysis The market analysis is generally the first of these three steps to be completed. Given the results of a thorough market analysis, determination can be made as to whether it is reasonable to pursue further study. The economic and site analysis will then provide more specific information in terms of project feasibility. The following provides more detailed information concerning each of the three components of the convention center analysis: 1. Market Feasibility The Tourism Techniques study provides a solid basis for a thorough market analysis of a Congress Hall in Vail. Based on our conversations with convention center feasibility consultants, there is a need to further refine the capture rate as projected for this facility. Generallly, two additional steps need to be taken: a. Competitive Market Analysis Within Vail It is critical to determine what percentage of the meeting market we are presently capturing. In addition, close analysis of the existing market can more clearly define the charateristics of groups who have already used Vail for meetings or conventions. For example, usage patterns already established in Vail relative to seasonality, group size and type, lodging nd facility needs, and a more clear understanding of business lost for lack of adequate facilities will all supplement the TT study. b. Competitive Market Analysis in Region Somewhat similar to the above mentioned analysis, the focus of this study would be on competing resort facilities in the region. 2. Economic/Financial Assessment The economic/financial assessment of a convention facility would include estimated building costs, expenses such as marketing and O and M, anticipated revenues (both direct and indirect), and financing alternatives. This analysis could also include recommended management strategies such as how its operation would interface with established entities within the Town. 3. Site/Programmatic Analysis This step would most logically be done concurrently with the economic/financial assessment. In many respects, the site/programmatic analysis is driven by the market feasibility information. For example, the individual markets for groups sizes will dictate the size of the facility, number of break-out rooms, etc. Alternataive uses would also be generated from the market study and refined during this process. Critical issues in the site analysis include environmental, planning (i.e. parking), transportation, and proximity to the Town's bed base. It should be understood that the information presented in.this memorandum is the result of a limited amount of research conducted this past week. It is based on information we have received from experts in the field of preparing feasibility studies for convention facilities. While the fundamental approach to evaluating the feasibility of this type of facility is universal, there are undoubtedly specific issues in Vail that would need to be addressed. It would be our recommendation that any further study initiated by the Town be done in a comprehensive manner to address the multitude of interrelated issues inolved in this process. Planning and Environmental Commission March 9, 1987 1:30 P.M. Site Visits 3:00 P.M. Public Hearinq 1. Approval of minutes of meeting of February 23. 2. Proposed revision to the Urban Design Guide Plan and a request for an exterior alteration in order to construct an addition to the Plaza Lodge building. Applicant: Plaza Lodge Associates, Ltd. 3. A request for exterior alteration and for a density control variance in order to construct an addition to the Sitzmark Lodge. - Applicant: Sitzmark Lodge/Bob Fritch 4. A request for a conditional use permit in order to construct an addition to the Learning Tree Preschool located at 129 North Frontage Road. Applicant: Learning Tree Preschool 5. A request for front and side setback variances in order to construct two dwelling units on Parcel A, a resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Michael Tennenbaum 6. A request for a front setback variance, a variance from required roof slope, and an amendment to the Arterial Business District circulation plan in order to construct a building at 1031 South Frontage Road. Applicant: Vail Commercial Partnership RECD MAR - 4 1987 241 E. Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 v / c " CHAMBER FORUM L UN C H E O N Date: March 10, 1987 Time: Cash Bar 11:30 Lunch at noon Location: Marriott Mark Resort Cost: 57.50 for members $8.50 for nor.-members Come watch the P.I.I. Magazine sections that aired in Northeast Ohio showingcas.ing Vail as a premier resort. Don't miss this dynamic footage! For reservations call Stella Cruz, ext. 13, by noon on Monday, March 5. *;Y***** k********~*yc**~r~k:k~c*ir*~c:~~c~c**~c*~kYc*;~* k~c~~k*YCxxxx *~c~c B U S= N E S S AFTER HOUR S Date: March 18, 1987 Time: 5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Given bv_: Eve Pieces of Vail and Memories Located at the top of Bridge Street(318 Hanson Ranch Rd). Bring your nor.-VRA friends-Complimentary beverages and hors d'oeuvres will be served. Great 'Door Prizes! CENTRAL RESERVATIONS • (303) 476-5677 MARKETINGiCHAMBER SERVICES • (303) 476-1000 • Denver Line 595.9488 AMERICAN SKI CLASSIC 1987 Schedule of Events Friday, March 6 Registration begins at Vail Room, Lodge at Vail Monday, March 9 10:15 Legends GS 1st Run, BC 11:30 Legends GS 2nd Run, BC 1:00 Grand Legends Race, BC Tuesday, March 10 10:45 Legends Ski Down, Vail 11:00 Legends DH 1st Run, Vail 12:00 Legends DH 2nd Run, Vail 7:00 Legends Banquet (Black Tie) BC, Village Hall Wednesday, March 11 10:00 Ford Cup 1st Round, BC 10:00 World Cup DH Training, Vail 7:00 Opening Ceremonies, Vail, International Finish Stadium Thursday, March 12 10:00 Ford Cup 2nd Round, BC 11:00 World Cup DH Training, Vail 1:30 Ford Cup Final Round, BC 3:30 European Tea Dance, BC, Village Hall 8:00 Wang Chung Concert, Dobson Arena (Tickets $12.00 each) Friday, March 13 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail 11:00 World Cup DH #1, Vail 7:00 Eagle's Nest Reception Saturday, March 14 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail 11:00 World Cup DH #2, Vail Sunday, March 15 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail 11:00 World Cup Super G, Vail Rf U0 MAR - 5 1987 ALASKA FLYFISHING EKPEDITIGiVS Nt "Salmon, Trout, Steelhead Wilderness Outfitters" March 4, 1987 Mr. Paul Johnson Vail Town Council Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81658 Dear Paul and Council: I am writing again because I am upset about government policies and actions. After repeated calls to the managers office I still am yet to have the call returned to me. I might ad that he works for~the citizens of this community and he is responsible to all of us. About 1:00 on December 8, 1986 I witnessed Mr. Charlie Wicks drive carelessly and dangerously and the result was a ticked issued by Tom Sealy of the police department. A very good source tells me today that the careless driving ticket issued was eventually voided and I'd like an exp:la-inat.inn as if it were me it never would have been voided. Is this the way our government is run? Charlie might be one great guy but he was in the wrong and the voiding of that ticket was equally as wrong. Members of the police department have been working to cover a short staff during peak times of this season and I am very surprised to see that there have been no bonuses issued to these members.::--; There have been bonuses issued to other employees and I don't see the justification P.O. BOX 952, 5042 SNOWSHOE LANE, VAIL, COLORADO 81658, U.S.A. 303-476-4915 -2- when in fact they have not been short staffed and were only doing their job as in their job description. I would also like to know why Mr. Phillips and his entire family has been given a pass by the town to the health club. For a man who is paid as much as he is and does not answer to some of the citizens; he is granted too much by the town. There are several very concerned citizens and I think this town should get a few things in order or it will see a barrage of public and national criticism soon. I don't want to see this town suffer adverse publicity but unless things get fixed fast I know there are several who are going to cause a lot of bad press. A neighbor of mine has asked to hear tapes of the planning departments meetings and decisions. He was denied and told that he could not hear them. He called and is very upset and is now seeking legal advice. Lets get with it and be responsible to your citizens. I look forward to your repy. I also would like all members of council to read this letter and my most recent one. I thank you and hope these letters will avoid what this town does not need; bad publicity. Sincerely, Tom Ley ti cc; Mike Reid RECD MAR - 5 1987 ALASKA t FLYFISHING EXPEDITIONS Nt "Salmon, Trout, Steelhead Wilderness Outfitters" 'Vo March 4, 1987 Mr. Paul Johnson_ Vail Town Council Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81658 Dear Paul and council: I am writing so that this issue gets to be known by all the members of council and that it becomes part of your records. I, along with many of my neighbors are so upset with some of the policies and-decisions that get approved by the town that we just want a few of our concerns addressed. Recently approval was given to a neighbor to allow him to operate a commercial business out of his home and build an office and business driveway to park all of his companies vehicles. The traffic, the noise and .:the danger that is now thrust upon our children is just unacceptable. There are days when upwards of twenty or more vehicles go in and out of this residence. We all own residential property and want our neighborhood to remain just that. Many of us do.business within our homes but not like a major property management company and it's associated maid, linen, service and personell trucks and vehicles. There have been numerous cars and trucks stuck and blocking the road and they all ad tto)aserious problem that the town still has not taken care of. P.O. BOX 952, 5042 SNOWSHOE LANE, VAIL, COLORADO 81658, U.S.A. 303-476-4915 -2- Main Gore Drive and the hill that services the upper end of east Vail has been the cause of many accidents and unless it is widened we are going to kill one of our children. Since 1975 I've called, complained, and bitched about that hill to every department that I thought was responsible enough to assist. On two occasions I have personally dug two of our past town managers out of the snowbank and only then did it get widened by plows but it never continued. Obviously this year has been tolerable. We want council to look into why this business, house construction, office construction, driveways were approved in our residential neighborhood. The owners of this business and the associated governing departments have not been very nice or courteous and that is not acceptable to any of us. I trust you will see that this matter will be taken care, of before too long. When government sets guidelines it is up to government to police not the citizens. I know you are a responsible man and that council should be sensitive to our concerns and we are going to let you all take care of this before we go any further. Sincerely, Tom LeRoy ti cc; Mike Reed, Rick Plyman REC'C MAR - 9 1987 EAGLE COUNTY 551 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631 (303)328-7311 March 5, 1987 f r . Mr. Ron Phillips, Manager ` ...y. TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ron: This is to confirm that the Board of County Commissioners has committed to contribute $100,000 towards the completion of the new I-70 interchange near LionsHead in Vail. This contribution will be in the 1988 Eagle County Capital Budget and will be payable during the first quarter of calendar 1988. The Board is anxious to see this project completed prior to the World Alpine Ski Championships in early 1989 and will continue to support the efforts of the Town and the State Highway Department to achieve this goal. Respectfully, EAGLE COUNTY 42- Lee Metcalfe Chief Administrative Officer LM/lw CC: Board of County Commissioners Bart Skidmore, Finance Director Doug Pilcher, Public Works Director Larry Metternick, Engineer Susie Vaughn, Comm. Development Director K. T . Gazuni s, Economic Development Director (ECEDC) Board of County Commissioners Assessor Clerk and Recorder Sheriff Treasurer P.O. Box 850 P.O. Box 449 P.O. Box 537 P.O. Box 359 P.O. Box 479 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 r ; 10WH of voil 75 south frontage road office of the town manager vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 March 9, 1987 The Honorable Roy Romer Governor State Capitol Building Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60, Vested Property Rights Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Governor Romer: Please find attached letters sent a few weeks ago to Representative Danny Williams and Senator Sally Hopper concerning the above referenced Bills. We would appreciate your support of Senate Bill 45 as it now stands in the Senate as we feel it solves many of the statutory problems concerning annexation which now exist. We would appreciate your vociferous opposition to Senate Bill 60 concerning vested property rights as the Bill is unnecessary and infringes dramatically on local government's right to accomplish planning and zoning within their communities. If Senate Bill 60 happens to pass the House, we would encourage you to veto the Bill when it comes to your desk. Since y4.P Ronda11 *ip T own Manager RVP/bsc Attachments ~~c : CML tOWO Of Vail 75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Dan Williams Colorado House of Representatives State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Mr. Williams: The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B. 45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts which might limit municipal annexation powers. The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill 1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further, The Honorable Dan Williams February 10, 1987 Page 2 H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincere- Pau l R. Joh ston Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc town Doff nail 75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Sally Hopper Colorado State Senator State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Senator Hopper: The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B. 45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts which might limit municipal annexation powers. The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill 1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further, The Honorable Sally Hopper February 10, 1987 Page 2 H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincere - Paul R. J¢hnston:.._. Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc IOWO of voil 75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Dan Williams Colorado House of Representatives State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights Dear Mr. Williams: I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for several reasons: 1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which demands the solution proposed. 2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the developer and the local government during the several stages of the development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until The Honorable Dan Williams February 10, 1987 Page 2 the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which benefits both the developer and the local community. 4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted. 5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals. 6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be effective by any new comprehensive plan. Sincere-l- y \ 1 auT R. J o h rys ton Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc „ i,. 10WH of Vail 75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Sally Hopper Colorado State,Senator ~St:ate Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights Dear Senator Hopper: I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for several reasons: 1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which demands the solution proposed. 2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the developer and the local government during the several stages of the development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until ~ L The Honorable Sally Hopper February 10, 1987 Page 2 the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which benefits both the developer and the local community. 4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted. 5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals. 6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be effective by any new comprehensive plan. S i n c-e-r y '-~a Jo nston Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc y RECD MAR - 9 1987, HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. 3799 HIGHWAY 82 AREA CODE P. O. DRAWER 2150 303 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 945-5491 March 6, 1987 Mr. Ron Phillips Manager, Town of Vail Vail, CO 81657 Re: I-70 Interchange Dear Ron: We had an productive session with an architect/planner con- cerning the Holy Cross Electric Association site. At the end of the meeting, it was our mutual agreement that the best use of the property is as a landscaped entry into Vail. The problem is that the Interchange reduces the options for the remaining portion of the lot to about three: a fast food operation, a service station, or a convenience store. These are not the most desirable uses from the Town's viewpoint and they are not uses that will command the proper price for the remaining ground, from Holy Cross's viewpoint. The Inter- change simply takes productive marketability out of the site. We feel that the solution to the problem is for Holy Cross Electric to sell the lot to the Town of Vail. To reflect our willingness to contribute to the Town's effort in getting the Interchange built, we are willing to discount the fair Market Value by a significant number. Further, we can offer terms which we feel should make the acquisition a relatively easy one for the Town. Using the recent Voliter sale as a guide, we can calculate a transaction. The buyers paid $500,000 for that property, with no commission involved. Calculating a 5% commission, one arrives at a fair market value for the site of $525,000. At 43.560 square feet, this comes to $12.05 per square foot. Multiplying that number by the 53,582 square feet of the Holy Cross site, we reach a fair market value of $645,663.10, say, $645,000. Holy Cross would be willing to discount the market value by 20%, to $516,000. We can offer terms of 10% at 8.75 per cent. Annual payments would amount to approxi- mately $57,000. As we discussed in your offices, Holy Cross is a consumer owned utility. We are obliged to represent the best interest of all our members, as well as that of the communities which we serve. We believe that the $129,000 discount, plus the terms that we are offering, accomplish both those objectives. Please let me know your thoughts. Sincerely, Davi 7s President DS/jt cc: Ed Grange ~~~L 1 a, ~.et f 'cil ~_trv>Gllta~! :-creation District E =rd of L"i rectors r,:,rsday, t'arch 12, 1987, 3:00 P! 1. Call to order 2. Approval of Minutes 2112187 and 2/19/87 3. Jim Mlorter (3 minutes) 4. Cash flow report - Wick/Parzonko 10 minutes) 5. David Kanelli - VRA (10 miunutes) A. Special Assessment - 5421.86 B. Management resource sweepstakes pool (see attached) 6. Celebrity Tennis Event - Rod Sherman (see attachead) (10 minutes) 7. Constructicn (20 minutes) A. Change orders - additional costs B. Loons report C. Beck report D. Draw request A7 8. Collins Agreement (see attached) (2 minutes) 9. Starter House Agreement-winter use - TOV (see attached) (2 minutes) 10. Motio j,4 to approve tenant for restaurant (2 minutes) 11. Donations A. Rotary Club (need letter) B. Great Race C. Crystal Ball - summer 10,88 12. Approval of PO's EXECUTIVE SESSION 13. Vt•tRD/TOV joint meeting report - Garton & Lapin (see attached) 14. Director of Golf Evaluation - 10,87 Agreement 15. Director of Tennis evaluation - 1987 agreement 16. Adjournment Attachments: Eiinutes 2/12/87 and 2/19/87 Liscio letter Rod Sherman letter Collins agreement Starter House agreement Gramshar,76,er letter Ted Martin letter (great race) VI2D/TOV financial information Susie Vaughn - Eagle County Donation - FYI M I t."JTES RECULAP F. EMNG VAIL tTTROPOLITAN P.ECF.EATION DISTRICT February 12, 1937 Y-3- 1EP.S PRESUM Merv Lapin George Knox Tim Garton Bob Ruder Fa,3ERS ABSM: Gail Molloy CTFE6: MEIMP.S PP.ESENT: Pat Godson, Steve Satterstrom CALL TO ORDEP.: Meeting was called to order at 3:05 PM E.FPPOVAL OF KIMUTES: Garton moved to approve the minutes of 2/8187 and 2/15/87, second by Lapin, passed unanimously. 1986 YTD Cash Balance: Dodson reviewed the District's financial position with the boasrd. In 1936 the District generated :1,254,144.09 and had expenditures of $993,341.56 leaving income over expenditures of $275,802.10. Cash balance as of 1-1-86 $62,395 bringing the totall income and cash balance to $333,197.50. 5262,1-09.56 was transfered to the construction account leavir:g the District with a cash balance of $75,787.97 as of 1-1-87- Ruder arrives: 3:10 PM Currently VMRD is overdrawn and can borrow money from the TOV at 8% until their cash flow improves. Lapin requested Dodson to see if funds can be borrowed from another source for less interest. CLUBHOUSE P.EMDEL: A. Interior Decorators - tabled B. Restaurant Lease proposals: Steve Satterstrom, Shirkie Evans, Bart Garton, Dave Garton were present. The Board has received proposals from three individuals: 1) Steve Satterstrom 2) Dave Garton, Bart Garton & Evans and 3) Pat & Nitzi Rabin. Dave Garton stated Satterstrom and he may possibly wish to combine proposals. They have no formal proposal to present to the Board at - this time and requested until 5 FM Friday to submit and combined proposal or stay with their individual proposals. The Board granted this extenticn. Tim Garton stated he will withdraw from voting or. this matter due to his relation with one of the potential lessees. Lapin raised the question does the Board have an ethical and morale problem with Pepi's proposal since the terms of the lease have changed. What is U RD's obligations to Pepi to offer nogotiations with him again since the deal has changed? Ruder feels no obligation to Pepi, since the Board was always willing to negotiate any terms with him. Knox does not feel any obligation to open the negotiations again. Garton stated if we go back to Pepi we must go back to korchowski too. He always felt Pepi was very CLaiified, b-'t C1ffiCUIt to deal With. Garton Las no nrC_'Em allowing rE;i to rEsubmit a prcposa1 under the n24: torT^.s. The 'rd sees no prole- in sencina Pepi a letter to let him k.rcr+ the teal as chanced and he car reapply if he so chores. Dave L Bart Garton and Evans all leave. C. Sackbauer Preposai: Rick Sackbauer, Peter Looms, Frank Payne and Andy Beck all join the meeting. Sackbauer stated Phase 1 is complete and Phase II is 9C*. complete per his proposal. Garton m de a motion to approve the Sackbauer agreement in the amount Of 1:5,760, second by Yncx and it passed unanimously. M4erv questions paying for restaurant construction and wanted to know if this would be passed along to the- lessee. Ruder and Knox stated possibly, but not necessarily. Merv wants to Board to seek reimbursement for all restaurant costs from. the future lessee. G. Report on clubhouse/restaurant and approval Of all Expenditures (see attached from Beck,. The column titled "other" represents 1TIRD or the restaurant lessee. Knox rade a motion to approve the $56,216 on the Seck proposal, second by Garton - 3 yes Garton„ Knox & Ruder, 1 no Lapin. The motion passed. E. Approval of Fifth Draw Lapin would like Dodson to find out why in 1986 there was a shortfall in collecting the general property taxes. Lapin moved to approve the fifth draw, second by Knox and it passed unanimously. The Board approved distribution of the sixth draw to subcontractors by Beck. F. Architect/Contractor Report. Looms rants some direction on what color the Board wants the building painted. Knox will pick the color for the building. Looms wants to know when and if they will be choosing an interior decorator. The Board indicated they hope to select one. Beck stated everything is moving along very smoothly. They are slightly ahead of schedule. Sackbauer's restaurant plan: The Board does not want the broom closet to be built where the plan currently show. The plan must be revised to show this space as a lounge. Sackbauer stated the health department requires chemicals be stored in a seperate closet. The board has no problem with Sackbauer redoing the plans to provide for the closet on the main floor, but it cannot be located in the space it occupies currently. Sackbauer will work on a revised plan for the Board. Looms, Beck and Sackbauer leave. LIQUOR LICEESE: The board would like to find out what the deadline dates would be to attend the March liquor board hearing. The Board would like Dodson to find out if the board is covered for liability if they apply for a liquor license. Garton stronly urges the board to choose a restaurant lessee so they can apply for the liquor license. If the board applies for the license End then transfers it to the leassee, tFe t•o;:rC is still held liable for the license durirg to lengthy transfer process. The Board will not proceed with filling out tte liquor license ar%lication at this time. X-COU,TRY SKI CO[TRACT: Knox made a r..cticn to approve the contract with Paragon, second by Carton, passed unanimously. NO Nflti GOLF =TRACT: Torn Y,orchowsky joins the meeting. Tom handed out a profit and loss statement for the 1985 tournament (see attached). Tom said the 1987 proceeds will be donated to the McLaughlin speed skating fund and the blind skier program. The Eoard asked Kcrchowsky that next year he provide the profit and loss statm_nt to them in a more tirrely fashion. Lapin moved to approved the 1987 No game Golf contract, second by Garton, passed unanimously. JEPRY FORD IialTATIO.'LU Satterstror: stated he reserves 25" of the tee tires or. Friday, 50: of CONTRACT: the tee times on Saturday ae,d 10CF of the tee times or, Sunday for Jerry Ford Invitational Tournament. If their percentace is not used, he then sells the times to the general public. Knox asked if there would be an amateur round this year on Sunday? Dodson will find out. Knox wants to give them Sunday, Monday and Tuesday and if there is an amateur round then give them Saturday. Merv wants the 1986 profit and loss statement. Dodson stated he has requested this in the past from the tournament and has never received a copy. The Board would like the course to become public on Tuesday as soon as the tournament is over. Merv feels dealing ?:ith public funds requires us to be concerned about how the JFI distributes the money. Lapin wants to write JFI and ask for their budget stating we are a public entity and legally reed disclosure. Garton and Ruder feel the board members of the JFI are very reputable people and do not feel this budget is necessary. The board wants the contract to state they will not give the exclusive use on August 15, 1987, but are willing to provide all the time JFI needs and request the budget as part of the contract. The contract should also state, the Tuesday after tournament play, the course will open to the public as soon as tournament players have teed off hole number 9 or 5 PM. Four free participant slots for 1'I?RD to assign to people to play should be put in the contract. Put this item on the next agenda. CO':PLIF:=isTA.RY 0LF/TEFMS Lapin made a motion to approve the attached list of individuals for H.SSES. complimentary eolf and tennis passes, second by Knox, passes unanimously. (see attached). C. hUTIO.'{S: Echo Ranch. Garton made a motion to give Echo ranch two-foursome rounds with carts, second by Knox and passed unanimously. V; iL F.SSCCIATES-25 YUPS: Dodson stated trolley had indicated she would like to hold a celebration at the nevi Clubhouse when FA holds their 25 year celebration. V1:.D1TO161 JOINT E"=tTIa: Lapin stated the, two groups discussed existing and future programs. Lapin made a motion to go into executive session to discuss a contract, second by Carton, unanimous. Tii AF7 LOCATION OF The Board wishes to male no changes at this time. The Board asked V" :D 1:_ETIE:;S: Satterstrom to write press releases for WRD. Ft:! L-TI!'.Z E-1:?LCYEE Th= EcErd k'OUlC' 1 i ke to s tay r::h ;.te `C V r. eri t sys tec,. Yruecer v;i 11 . k:i„E S: CO E'eaiLdLlOf1S Gn, ~h15 ? fUll-:1('° r°_Cp'E and GCGSGR ni Il eVFlLc'`.2 B°R. Garton raoe arc±icn te accept tr.e rerit increase :ased en the rarge, seccr.d by Knox> Fassed unanir.,ously. Pli wfv"•.SE C".DEPS: Lap=n rade a rc*_ien tc appreve the FC's as preserted> seconz by 6artor, passed urar„ reu_1y. YK:.D/TOY VANAEUOFT See attached Fhillips mmo and Rescluticn F;o. 2. Lapin rade a mction AUZr-fiT (additional to zp-prove the Resolution tt'c. 2 and zccept the TOV pmposal of a rerth it`.:): to morth r.arz_er~ert egreer.•er,t, se:ord ty k'.nox, passed ur.arir,wusly. LE6.!.L SERYICES: The board would like to interview Collins and Ricer kSAP. The bcard werts to meet r:ext Thursdsy, Febrvary 14, 191-37 at 3 PM to oiscuss the restzurart lessee and ir.erveirr the zttorneys. Keed to advertise this reetirtg. CG'dTRACTS [30o a QOT: The discussicn of the Director of 6clf and Oirector of Ter.ris r:as tabled. I,CztOJPJ-.7,1--KT: 6artcn rcved to adjourr, secer.d by Y.nax> unarirous. 7:00 PM Ga-11 h,olloy t! I t; "TES REGULAR. F:=ETIF;S VAIL FETPOPOLITAR F.ECREATIO?' DISTRICT February 19, 1987 BOAP.D tOSEPS PRESENT: Merv Lapin Gail Molloy Tim Garton Bob Ruder George Knox OTF:ERS PRESENT: Pat Dodson CELL TO ORDER: M;eetina was called to order at 3:00 Pr IKTERYIEII RESTAUP.ART Garton stated he mould like to decide'today on a restaurateur so they APPLICANTS: can apply for the liquor license and not the board. The Board interviewed Fat Rabin. She will supply the board with a copy of their proposed menu and she will give her answer to the $91-0,000 or rebate-ment of rent after she speaks to Nitzi. The Board interviewed Garton, Garton & Evans. They will pay $20,000 with a signed lease and $10,000 each year starting in years 3-11. They want VMRD to pay 100' of roof shoveling and pay interest on the security deposit. Lapin leaves at 4:15 PM. The Board interviewed Pick Sackbauer who was acting in Steve Satterstroms behalf while he is out of town. Sackbauer would be Satterstroms manager and Satterstrom will be the owner. The board wants to know if Satterstrom will be paying $105,000 plus $45,000 or just the 51-05,000. Ruder will contact Satterstrom when he returns to town tomorrow to clarify his proposal. The board made no decision on a lessee today. Ruder will be contacting all the board members by phone for a timely decision. Note: Tim Garton will not vote due to his relationship with one of the applicants. IETERVIEW ATTOPNEYS The Board interviewed Larry Rider. Rider will charge a per hour rate or a flat retainer fee ?•:ith a per hour cost after maximum on retainer. Litigation is billed at a higher rate. John McHaffey his partner represents many other cities. Larry worked for the TOV from 1976-62, but currently has no connection with the Town. Sees no conflict in working with the Town. Garton leaves at 5:30 PM Rider has 3 people in office who could answer VMRD questions. Statements should be easy to read - they have just redone their billing system. Letters v:culd go out fast. Other documents would depend on their size. Gail Molloy leaves 5:t0 PM. No quorum present. The C,iEI-d friar\'lEl:cd Collins. Ct ',he d ,trios Fe c-,;,-rEr.',I)- Serves he only attends he Eagle Vail District's regular m_etires. Staff size is 4 attorneys, 4 bacl'.-!.'C, ; paralegal, I Cier1ca1. Two attorneys are special districts. Turn around time for documents is 1 week if all issues are solved. Letter would take 1 day. He is in Vail at least I day per week. The board did not choose an attorney at this time. DO::ATIONS: As a euorurr was not present this item was tabled. ANDLIPIDENT: The meeting adliourr,ed at 6:00 PM Gail ~:olloy, Secretary Sul Z.C :?IL 7 5. CPSTCS PROG:.?.: IN!'OR"rATZION SHEET 03JECTIVA, Develop a major sweepstakes campaign that will leverage the Vail destination name and generate for the Greater Vail Resort Area an estimated total advertising exposure of $3.4 :.pillion. STRATEGY: Implemcnt a sweepstakes promotion program for the summer sea- son in eight mnaior markets. PROPOSED PACKAGE: Summer Promotion Rcsou.ccc mill r zcuirc r and Vail acti'. _ies to be included in each ::ar"cet's price structure. en- vision these travel packages will vary in quantity and 1cnrIn of stay dependent upon the market and partner. Most Sisi:ifi- cantly, we belicv_ it 15 i'pGrta::t to be 'Jre focused on Tami- lics for su er. room, nights (double and quad rooms) --1233 one-day activity vouchers (bi e rental, golf, tennis, horseback riding, or~=_-'Zcd Giking, fishing, Vail special events, and `;,.cola rides. (303 Gondola tickets :.avc been. contributed by VAI.) JOINT PARTNERS: Vail Resort Association Rucio Stations Vail Associates, Inc. Car Rental Companies Retailers Other Ground Operators Airlines ,`'u1RKETS Summer Promotion Los Angelcs - C1-.icag0 Washington, D.C. San Diego .St. Louis Kansas City Dallas COLLI:\ S AL-IS-D COCKREL, P.C. PAUL R COCKREL ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE JAMES P. COLLINS 445 UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 129 13031 986-1551 ROBERT L. TIBBALS. JR. DENVER. COLORADO 80228 COLORADO WATS 1-800-354-5941 February 26, 1987 Board of Directors Vail Metropolitan Recreation District 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Board Members: We, of course, are very pleased to be selected to serve as the general counsel for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation Dis- trict. We appreciate the confidence you have shown in us, and will make every effort to live up to your expectations. We understand the District Board does not believe it is necessary for me to be at each of the Board meetings, but wishes for me instead to be "on call" to serve as a need arises. We have no objection to this arrangement, and, in accordance with our previous proposal to you, we will simply work on an hourly basis, fully documenting all time spent in our monthly bills. We commit not to change our hourly billing rate through at least December 31, 1987. We consider our employment to be an employment "at will" and will accept termination upon written notice from the District without any time delay. We understand that pertinent files and records of the District pertaining to legal issues will be transferred to our office at the District's, or. its previous counsel's, earliest - convenience. Of significant importance to us, at a minimum, are the files pertaining to the following: - District Formation - Outstanding Contracts - Easements, Leases and Other Property Interests - Audits and Audit Representation Letters - Outstanding Lawsuits - Insurance, Bonds, Oaths of Office, Disclosure Statements, etc. - Bond Documents, Covenants, Trust Agreements, etc. - Other Pertinent Files Other persons with whom the District will have contact are Sue Blair, my paralegal assistant, and Robert Tibbals, my partner with whom I work most closely regarding Eagle County district matters. Of course, any member of our firm is always available to the staff or Board of the District. COLLIN S AN -D COCKREL, P.C. Board of Directors Vail Metropolitan Recreation District February 26, 1987 Page Two If this complies with your understanding of our agreement, please execute below and return a copy at your convenience. Sincerely, COLLINS AND COC=- L, P.C. James P. Collins JPC/sb Accepted by the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District this day of , 1987. VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT By: Title: AGREEfM STARTER HOUSE - 1986/87 VIKTER USE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation (*the Town") and the VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body ("the District") on January 8, 1986. WHEREAS, the District presently leases the building on the Vail Golf Course commonly known as the Starter House as well as the golf course itself from the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town in conjunction with Paragon Guides wishes -to utilize the Starter House and the Golf Course for the 1986/1987 ski season for a cross-country ski operation operated by the Town for the benefit of the visitors and residents of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the District is willing to allow the Town to utilize the Starter House facility, the Golf Course and the cross-country ski tracks which the District sets on the Golf Course, for such purposes under the terms and conditions as are set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises herein contained, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1. The Town will have the right to use the Starter House, the Golf Course and the tracks set by the District on the Golf Course from December 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987 on the following days and at the following times: Sunday through Thursday from 9 AM to 4 PM. Paragon guides will have the right to use the Starter House Friday and Saturday from 9 AM to 4 PM. The Town shall use the Starter House for the following purposes: a. The rental of cross-country skis and related equipment b. The service of packaged food and beverages c. As a warming house for cross-country skiers d. Daily cross-country lessons nd various outings 2. The monies raised by the Town through rentals, programs and food sales will fall short of the cost of operating the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation and therefore the Town will pay $10.00 rent to the District for the use of the Starter House for the purpose set forth herein. 3. Prior to using the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation, the Town will remove the carpet in the dining area of the Starter House and store same for the winter and re-install it prior to the time the Starter House is used by the Recreation District for the golf season. 4. Ski racks will be placed around the building and signs will be posted indicating that skiers should not lean their skis or poles against the Starter House. In addition, cross-country skiers will be prohibited from bringing their skis inside the House and the Town will post signs indicating same. 5. The Town will open the rest rooms in the facility only when an eimployee of the Town or Paragon Guides is present to supervise the use of the facility. The Town will be responsible for the cleaning, repair and maintenance of the facilitiy during the time set forth herein that the Town has possession of the premises. 6. The Town and Paragon Guides will produce and distribute a cross-country brochure to all those renting cross-country ski equipment at the Starter House. The Town shall pay fifty percent (5000) of the cost of reproduction. The brochure will contain information informing the public of the proper use of the golf course by cross-country skiers so as to minimize any damage to the golf course. 7. The Town will pay for seventy (70:) of the utility, water and sanitation costs for the term of this agreement and Paragon Guides will pay thirty percent (3000). 8. Any firewood utilized by the Town in the course of its cross-country ski operation shall be stored two feet from the building on the west side so as to prevent the structure from being nicked and scraped by wood. 9. Any damage to the Starter House caused by the negligence of the Town of Vail during its use of the facility as a cross-country ski operation will be repaired by the Town of Vail Zt the Town's cost prior to April 15, 1986. However, it is understood that should ar.y such damage be covered by the District's fire or casualty insurance, then the Town shall not be liable for such damage. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hand and seal the date first above written. TOWN OF VAIL, A Colorado municipal corporation P.ondall V. Phillips VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body Robert W. Ruder 1986 VAIL REC. SUDSIDIES Oper. Revenues Le=_s Expenses User- Fee Ta;; Rev Exp Subsidy Go l f Course 788 , w i 7S1,000 ( 7,331) Clubhouse Debt O 300,000 300,000 Tennis 58,310 77,742 39,472 Golf Course Lease 0 70,000 70,00c) Subtotal VNRD 826,641 1,22S,742 402,101 Golf Course Debt 0 272,000 272,000 Arena Oper. 300,779 470yci00 169,221 Arena Debt 0 2ti~.- ~68~?_,OnB Recreation Programs 2;5,787 539,126 293,339 Misc. Park: Debt 0 850,OOO e50,000 World Cup, Champ., Coors 0 125,450 125,450 Subtotal TOV 546,566 2,462,144 1,915,578 TOTAL VAIL 1,373,207. 3,690,886 2,317,679 f l ' TOV Golf Course Debt Arena Operations a'•. ._~1" ~ VhiRD Golf Course Lease Tennis Arena Debt ' Clubhouse Debt . - = _ _ _ - - - - ---__I Recreation Programs. ail - - - - - - - - - i I World Cup '89 Championship - - - - - - - - - - - - - -G Coors ;j 1'" Misc. Park Debt /O REC'C MAR - 9 1987: EAGLE COUNTY 551 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631 (303) 328-7311 March 5, 1987 x Mr. Ron Phillips, Manager TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ron: This is to confirm that the Board of County Commissioners has committed to contribute $100,000 towards the completion of the new I-70 interchange near LionsHead in Vail. This contribution will be in the 1988 Eagle County Capital Budget and will be payable during the first quarter of calendar 1988. The Board is anxious to see this project completed prior to the World Alpine Ski Championships in early 1989 and will continue to support the efforts of the Town and the State Highway Department to achieve this goal. Respectfully, EAGLE COUNTY Lee Metcalfe Chief Administrative Officer LM/lw cc: Board of County Commissioners Bart Skidmore, Finance Director Doug Pilcher, Public Works Director Larry Metternick, Engineer Susie Vaughn, Comm. Development Director K. T . Gazuni s, Economic Development Director (ECEDC) Board of County Commissioners Assessor Clerk and Recorder Sheriff Treasurer P.O. Box 850 P.O. Box 449 P.O. Box 537 P.O. Box 359 P.O. Box 479 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 town of mil 75 south frontage road office of the town manager vail, colorado 81657 (303) 476-7000 March 9, 1987 The Honorable Roy Romer Governor State Capitol Building Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60, Vested Property Rights Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Governor Romer: Please find attached letters sent a few weeks ago to Representative Danny Williams and Senator Sally Hopper concerning the above referenced Bills. We would appreciate your support of Senate Bill 45 as it now stands in the Senate as we feel it solves many of the statutory problems concerning annexation which now exist. We would appreciate your vociferous opposition to Senate Bill 60 concerning vested property rights as the Bill is unnecessary and infringes dramatically on local government's right to accomplish planning and zoning within their communities. If Senate Bill 60 happens to pass the House, we would encourage you to veto the Bill when it comes to your desk. Since y, Rondall V. Phil ips Town Manager RVP/bsc Attachments b CC : CM L laUi ~j i r ~t At 10WH of voil 1~ 75 south frontage road • vail, Colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Dan Williams Colorado House of Representatives State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Mr. Williams: The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B. 45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts which might limit municipal annexation powers. The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill 1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further, The Honorable Dan Williams February 10, 1987 Page 2 H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincer_~ Paul R. Joh ston Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc 10WO of nail 75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Sally Hopper Colorado State Senator State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions Dear Senator Hopper: The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B. 45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts which might limit municipal annexation powers. The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill 1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further, The Honorable Sally Hopper February 10, 1987 Page Z H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Since Paul R. Johnston,- Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc • ~ilcc rn' NG'11-nC C P11^ U`,` .v , 10WO of voil 75 south frontage road • vail, Colorado 81657. • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 The Honorable Dan Williams Colorado House of Representatives State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights Dear Mr. Williams: I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for several reasons: 1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which demands the solution proposed. 2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the developer and the local government during the several stages of the development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until The Honorable Dan Williams February 10, 1987 Page 2 the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which benefits both the developer and the local community. 4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted. 5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals. 6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be effective by any new comprehensive plan. Sin4.J ` r auT Roh ton Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc It towgo 75 south fr ontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000 office of the mayor February 10, 1987 bucae1:_, JUi The Honorable Sally Hopper Colorado State:Senator. State Capitol Bui 1 ding 200 East Colfax Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights Dear Senator Hopper: I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for several reasons: 1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which demands the solution proposed. 2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the developer and the local government during the several stages of the development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until - L The Honorable Sally Hopper February 10, 1987 Page Z the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which benefits both the developer and the local community. 4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted. 5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals. 6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be effective by any new comprehensive plan. Since y,. ~Pa Jo nston .Mayor PRJ/LAE/bsc y. RECD MAR - 9 1987; HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. 3799 HIGHWAY 82 AREA CODE P. O. DRAWER 2150 303 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 9455491 March 6, 1987 Mr. Ron Phillips Manager, Town of Vail Vail, CO 81657 Re: I-70 Interchange Dear Ron: We had an productive session with an architect/planner con- cerning the Holy Cross Electric Association site. At the end of the meeting, it was our mutual agreement that the best use of the property is as a landscaped entry into Vail. The problem is that the Interchange reduces the options for the remaining portion of the lot to about three: a fast food operation, a service station, or a convenience store. These are not the most desirable uses from the Town's viewpoint and they are not uses that will command the proper price for the remaining ground, from Holy Cross's viewpoint. The Inter- change simply takes productive marketability out of the site. We feel that the solution to the problem is for Holy Cross Electric to sell the lot to the Town of Vail. To reflect our willingness to contribute to the Town's effort in getting the Interchange built, we are willing to discount the fair Market Value by a significant number. Further, we can offer terms which we feel should make the acquisition a relatively easy one for the Town. Using the recent Voliter sale as a guide, we can calculate a transaction. The buyers paid $500,000 for that property, with no commission involved. Calculating a 5% commission, one arrives at a fair market value for the site of $525,000. At 43.560 square feet, this comes to $12.05 per square foot. Multiplying that number by the 53,582 square feet of the Holy Cross site, we reach a fair market value of $645,663.10, say, $645,000. Holy Cross would be willing to discount the market value by 20%, to $516,000. We can offer terms of 10% at 8.75 per cent. Annual payments would amount to approxi- mately $57,000. As we discussed in your offices, Holy Cross is a consumer owned utility. We are obliged to represent the best interest of all our members, as well as that of the communities which we serve. We believe that the $129,000 discount, plus the terms that we are offering, accomplish both those objectives. Please let me know your thoughts. Sincerely, I Davi oa President DS/jt cc: Ed Grange AWN "a . 1 F'_tro:;o i i tan ;ecreati on Di stri ct B =rd of Directors ih,:rsday, March 12, 1987, 3:00 P!i 1. Call to order 2. Approval of Minutes 2112187 and 2/19/87 3. Jim t1orter (3 minutes) 4. Cash fl o~vi report - k' i ck/Parzonko 10 minutes) 5. David Kanelli - VRA (10 miunutes) A. Special Assessment - $421.86 B. Management resource sweepstakes pool (see attached) 6. Celebrity Tennis Event - Rod Sherman (see attached) (10 minutes) 7. Construction (20 minutes) A. Change orders - additional costs B. Looms report C. Beck report D. Draw request #7 8. Collins Agreement (see attached) (2 minutes) 9. Starter House Agreement-winter use - TOV (see attached) (2 minutes) 10. MotioN to approve tenant for restaurant (2 minutes) 11. Donations A. Rotary Club (need letter) B. Great Race C. Crystal Ball - summer 1988 12. Approval of PO's EXECUTIVE SESSION 13. VMRD/TOV joint meeting report - Garton & Lapin (see attached) 14. Director of Golf Evaluation - 10,87 Agreement 15. Director of Tennis evaluation - 1987 agreement 16. Adjournment Attachments: Ilinutes 2/12/87 and 2/19/87 Liscio letter Rod Sherman letter Collins agreement Starter House agreement Gramsharmmer letter Ted Martin letter (great race) VI•JRD/TOV financial information Susie Vaughn - Eagle County Donation - FYI M I MUTES REGULAR. l=TING VAIL kTTROPOLITAN P.EUTATION DISTRICT February 12, 1987 1-12-ZEP.S PRESEKM Merv Lapin George Knox Tim, Garton Bob Ruder F-aWERS ABSENT: Gail Molloy OTTER k.~:~EPS PRESENT: Pat Dodson, Steve Satterstrom ULL TO OP.DEP,: Meeting was called to order at 3:05 PM E.FPPOVAL OF KIMMS: Garton moved to approve the minutes of 2/8/87 and 2/15/67, second by Lapin, passed unanimously. 1986 YTD Cash Balance: Dodson reviewed the District's financial position with the boasrd. In 1996 the District generated $1,254,144.09 and had expenditures of ;998,341.56 leaving income over expenditures of $275,802.10. Cash balance as of 1-1-86 $62,?95 bringing the totall income and cash balance to $338,197.50. 5262,409.56 was transfered to the construction account leaving the District with a cash balance of $75,787.97 as of 1-1-87._, Ruder arrives: 3:10 PM Currently VMRD is overdrawn and car, borrow money from the TOV at 6% until their cash flow improves. Lapin requested Dodson to see if funds can be borrowed from another source for less interest. CLUBHOUSE REMODEL: A. Interior Decorators - tabled B. Restaurant Lease proposals: Steve Satterstrom, Shirkie Evans, Bart Garton, Dave Garton were present. The Board has received proposals from three individuals: 1) Steve Satterstrom 2) Dave Garton, Bart Garton & Evans and 3) Pat & Nitzi Rabin. Dave Garton stated Satterstrom and he may possibly wish to combine proposals. They have no formal proposal to present to the Board at - this time and requested until 5 FM Friday to submit and combined proposal or stay with their individual proposals. The Board granted this extentien. Tim Garton stated he will withdraw from voting on this matter due to his relation with one of the potential lessees. Lapin raised the question does the Board have an ethical and morale problem with Pepi's proposal since the terns of the lease have changed. What is VMRD's obligations to Pepi to offer negotiations with him again, since the deal has changed? Ruder feels no obligation to Pepi, since the Board was always willing to negotiate any terns with him. Knox does not feel any obligation to open the negotiations again. Garton stated if we go back to Pepi we rust go back to korchowski too. He always felt Pepi was very gLallfied, IL-,;-,,t difficult to deal with. Garton has no prc:lE- allowing PEp1 to rEsubr.: t a proposal under the nev.. tEr-.s. The ~-'G=_rc sees nc problem in sencina Pepi a letter tc let him krcw the deal `as chanced and he car: rEapply if he so choses. Dave L Eart Garton and Evans all leave. C. Sackbauer Proposal: Rick Sackbauer, Peter Looms, Frank PayTE and Andy Beck all join the meeting. Sackbauer stated Phase 1 is complete and Phase II is 90A complete per his proposal. Garton made a motion to approve the Sackbauer agreement in the amount of $2,750, second by ftc x and it passed unanimously. Merv questions paying for restaurant construction and wanted to know if this would be passed along to the- lessee. Ruder and Knox stated possibly, but not necessarily. Merv wants to Board to seek reimbursement for all restaurant costs from the future lessee. D. Report on clubhouse/restaurant and approval of all expenditures (see attached from Beck). The column titled "other" represents VMRD or the restaurant lessee. Knox made a motion to approve the $56,216 on the Beck proposal, second by Garton - 3 yes Garton, Knox L Ruder, 1 no Lapin. The notion passed. E. Approval of Fifth Draw - Lapin would like Dodson to find out why in 1986 there was a shortfall in collecting the general property taxes. Lapin moved to approve the fifth draw, second by Knox and it passed unanimously. The Board approved distribution of the sixth draw to subcontractors by Beck. F. Architect/Contractor Report. Looms karts some direction on what color the Board wants the building painted. Knox will pick the color for the building. Looms hunts to know when and if they will be choosing an interior decorator. The Board indicated they hope to select one. Beck stated everything is moving along very smoothly. They are slightly ahead of schedule. Sackbauer's restaurant plan: The Board does not want the broom closet to be built where the plan currently show. The plan must be revised to show this space as a lounge. Sackbauer stated the health department requires chemicals be stored in a seperate closet. The board has no problem with Sackbauer redoing the plans to provide for the closet on the main floor, but it cannot be located in the space it occupies currently. Sackbauer will work on a revised plan for the Board. Looms, Beck and Sackbauer leave. LIQUOR LICEPSE: The board would like to find out what the deadline dates would be to attend the March liquor board hearing. The Board would like Dodson to find out if the board is covered for liability if they apply for a liquor license. Garton stronly urges the board to choose a restaurant lessee so they can apply for the liquor license. If the board applies for the license and then transfers it to the leassee, the t•osrd is still held liable for the lice.^se durir:g the lencthy transfer process. The Eoard Ni11 net proceed with filling out Vne liquor license application at this time. X-COU',TRY SKI CON7UCT: Knox made a motion to approve the contract with Paragon, second by Garton, passed unanimously. KO WME GOLF CONTRACT: Tom Y.orchowsky joins the meeting. Tom handed out a profit and loss statement for the 1985 tournament (see attached). Tom said the 1987 proceeds will be donated to the McLaughlin speed skating fund and the blind skier program. The Eoard asked Kcrchowsky that next year he provide the profit and less statment to them in a more tirrely fashion. Lapin moved to approved the 1987 ho Name Golf contract, second by Garton, passed unanimously. JcPRY FORD IiWITATI0'AL Satterstrom stated he reserves 2E" of the tee times on Friday, 50R of CO't-MACT: the tee times on Saturday and 10CF of the tee tires on Sunday for Jerry Ford Invitational Tournament. If their percentace is not used, he then sells the times to the general public. Knox asked if there would be an amateur round this year on Sunday? Dodson will find out. Knox wants to give them Sunday, Monday and Tuesday and if there is an amateur round then give them Saturday. Merv wants the 1986 profit and less statement. Dodson stated he has requested this in the past from the tournament and has never received a copy. The Board would like the course to become public on Tuesday as soon as the tournament is over. Merv feels dealing with public funds requires us to be concerned about how the JFI distributes the money. Lapin wants to write JFI and ask for their budget stating we are a public entity and legally reed disclosure. Garton and Ruder feel the board members of the. JFI are very reputable people and do not feel this budget is necessary. The board rants the contract to state they will not give the exclusive use on August 15, 1987, but are willing to provide all the time JFI needs and request the budget as part of the contract. The contract should also state, the Tuesday after tournament play, the course will open to the public as soon as tournament players have teed off hole number 9 or 5 PM. Four free participant slots for V RD to assign to people to play should be put in the contract. Put this item on the next agenda. CC':PLIr_1iTA.RY E'JLF/TEE;.IS Lapin made a motion to approve the attached list of individuals for FASSES: complimentary Golf and tennis passes, second by Knox, passes unanimously. (see attached). V.0"ATIO;S: Echo Ranch. Garton made a motion to give Echo ranch two-foursomme rounds with carts, second by Knox and passed unanimously. Vt'.!L ASSOCIATES-25 YE1'.PS: Dodson stated t;olloy had indicated she would like to hold a celebration at the nevr Clubhouse when VA holds their 25 year celebration. JaIfT F_ttIra: Lapin stated the, two groups discussed existing and future programs. Lapin made a r::otion to go into executive session to discuss a contract, second by Garton, unanimous. T1:-:= AED LOCATION OF The Board wishes to make no changes at this time. The Board asked Y`::`.D f:_ETIfi,"-S: Satterstrom to write press releases for WRD. FULL-TI'E2 -n:'.''LOTEE The Board mould like to stay rah the TH merit syste,m. K.ruecer will k:AZES: do evaluations cn his 3 full-tire people and Dodscn kill evaluate Sen. Garton rade a r.ticn to accept the merit increase based on the range, second by Knox, passed unanimously. PU^;F{ASE OPLEPS: Lapin made a rc*_ion to approve the PC's as presented, second by Garton, passed unanimously. VYaD/TOV Ev,tiAGEWDT See attached Phillips memo and Resolution No. 2. Lapin made a motion AUIE~ItT (additional to approve the Resolution No. 2 and accept the TOV proposal of a month ite to month manacer:,ent agreement, second by Knox, passed unanimously. LEGAL SERVICES: The board would like to interview Collins and Rider ASAP. The board hunts to meet next Thursday, February 19, 1987 at 3 PM to discuss the restaurant lessee and interveiw the attorneys. Need to advertise this meeting. CO'N'TRACTS DOG fi DOT: The discussion of the Director of Golf and Director of Tennis was tabled. ADJOUPWIC- NT: Garton moved to adjourn, second by Knox, unanimous. 7:00 PM Gail Nolloy MINUTES P.EGULAR VEETIHS VAIL F =TP.CPOLITAN RLCREf,TION DISTRICT February 19, 19087 BOAP.D ~DSEPS PRESENT: Merv Lapin. Gail Molloy Tim Garton Bob Ruder George Knox OTHM PRESENT: Pat Dodson ULL TO ORDER: Meetina was called to order at 3:00 PM IKfERYIEW REESTAUP.ANT Garton stated he would like to decide-today on a restaurateur so they APPLICANTS: can apply for the liquor license and not the board. The Board interviewed Pat Rabin. She will supply the board with a copy of their proposed menu and she will give her answer to the $90,000 or rebate-ment of rent after she speaks to Nitzi. The Board interviewed Garton, Garton & Evans. They will pay £20,000 with a signed lease and $10,000 each year starting in years 3-11. They want VMRD to pay 100'. of roof shoveling and pay interest on the security deposit. Lapin leaves at 4:15 PM. The Board interviewed Pick Sackbauer who was acting in Steve Satterstroms behalf while he is cut of town. Sackbauer would be Satterstroms manager and Satterstrom will be the owner. The board wants to know if Satterstrom will be paying $105,0:10 plus $45,000 or just the $105,000. Ruder will contact Satterstrom when he returns to town tomorrow to clarify his proposal. The board made no decision on a lessee today. Ruder will be contacting all the board members by phone for a timely decision. Note: Tim Garton will not vote due to his relationship with one of the applicants. IHT'ERVIEW ATTORNEYS The Board interviewed Larry Rider. Rider will charge a per hour rate or a flat retainer fee 4.rith a per hour cost after naximum on retainer. Litigation is billed at a higher rate. John hicNaffey his partner represents many other cities. Larry worked for the TOY from 1976-E2, but currently has no connection with the Town. Sees no conflict in working with the Town. Garton leaves at 5:30 PM Rider has 3 people in office v:ho could answer VMRD questions. Statements should be easy to read - they have just redone their billing system. Letters would go out fast. Other documents would depend on their size. Gail Molloy leaves 5:t0 PH. No quorum present. The 6card interviEwed v':- COilins. Of the districts F.e cxrEntly serves he only attends the Eagle Fail District's regular ne-e-tings. Staff size is 4 attorneys, 4 tack-up, : paralegal, i clerical. Two attorneys are special districts. Turn around time for documents is 1 week if all issues are solved. Letter would take I day. He is in Vail at least I day per week. The board did not choose an attorney at this time. M ATIONS: As a quorum was not present this item was tabled. AXOUNKEI'M: The meeting adliourned at 6:00 PM Gail holloy, Secretary A!L 87 S'.. UPST:~::LS PRO i.'.''f INFOiZ:u1TiON SHEET OBJECTIVE: Develop a major sweepstakes campaign that will leverage the Vail destination name and generate for the Greater Vail Resort Area an estimated total advertising cxposurc of $3.4 ;.million. STRATEGY: Implement a sweepstakes promotion program. for the summer sea- son in eight .major markets. PROPOSED PACKAGE: Summer Pro-motion _ Res o;.rccc w-i I r.: cuir _ r _ anal Va,1 al.ti'. 1cs to CC 1r-,eluded in each :.:ar;:ez s pr1ZC structure. C vision these travel packages will vary in quantity and long of stay dependcnt upon the market and partner. ?lost s_s, nifi- cantly, we believe it is im.po ta.t to be -orc.focused cn fami- lies for summer. --1200 room nights (double and quad rooms) --1233 one-day activity vouchers (bi4ke rental, golf, tennis, horseback riding, orga-izcd hiking, fishing, Vail special events, and - Bola rides. (800 Gondola tickets 'r:avc bL_n con~ributed by VAI.) JOINT PAR NERS : Vail Resort Association Cu~io Stations Vail Associates, Inc. Car Rental Co-panics Retailers Other Ground Operators Airlines LIL,%RKETS Sumer Promotion Los Angeles - C iCago Washington, D.C. San Diego .St. Louis Kansas City Dallas COLLINS AND COCKREL, P.C. PAJL R. COCKREL ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE JAMES P. COLLINS 445 UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 129 (3031 986-1551 ROBERT L. TIBBALS. JR. DENVER. COLORADO 80228 COLORADO WATS 1.800-354-5941 February 26, 1987 Board of Directors Vail Metropolitan Recreation District 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Board Members: We, of course, are very pleased to be selected to serve as the general counsel for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation Dis- trict. We appreciate the confidence you have shown in us, and, will make every effort to live up to your expectations. We understand the District Board does not believe it is necessary for me to be at each of the Board meetings, but wishes for me instead to be "on call" to serve as a need arises. We have no objection to this arrangement, and, in accordance with our previous proposal to you, we will simply work on an hourly basis, fully documenting all time spent in our monthly bills. We commit not to change our hourly billing rate through at least December 31, 1987. We consider our employment to be an employment "at will" and will accept termination upon written notice from the District without any time delay. We understand that pertinent files and records of the District pertaining to legal issues will be transferred to our office at the District's, or. its previous counsel's, earliest - convenience. Of significant importance to us, at a minimum, are the files pertaining to the following: - District Formation - Outstanding Contracts - Easements, Leases and Other Property Interests - Audits and Audit Representation Letters - Outstanding Lawsuits - Insurance, Bonds, Oaths of Office, Disclosure Statements, etc. - Bond Documents, Covenants, Trust Agreements, etc. - Other Pertinent Files Other persons with whom the District will have contact are Sue Blair, my paralegal assistant, and Robert Tibbals, my partner with whom I work most closely regarding Eagle County district matters. Of course, any member of our firm is always available to the staff or Board of the District. COLLINS AND COCKREL, P.C. Board of Directors Vail Metropolitan Recreation District February 26, 1987 Page Two If this complies with your understanding of our agreement, please execute below and return a copy at your convenience. Sincerely, COLLINS AND LOCI=-L, P.C. James P. Collins JPC/sb Accepted by the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District this day of , 1987. VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT By: Title: AGREE EKT STARTER HOUSE - 1986/87 VIKTER USE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation ('the Town") and the VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body ("the District") on January 8, 1986. WHEREAS, the District presently leases the building on the Vail Golf Course commonly known as the Starter House as well as the golf course itself from the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town in conjunction with Paragon Guides wishes -to utilize the Starter House and the Golf Course for the 1986/1987 ski season for a cross-country ski operation operated by the Town for the benefit of the visitors and residents of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the District is willing to allow the Town to utilize the Starter House facility, the Golf Course and the cross-country ski tracks which the District sets on the Golf Course, for such purposes under the terms and conditions as are set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises herein contained, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1. The Town will have the right to use the Starter House, the Golf Course and the tracks set by the District on the Golf Course from December 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987 on the following days and at the following times: Sunday through Thursday from 9 AM to 4 PM. Paragon guides will have the right to use the Starter House Friday and Saturday from:9 AM to 4 PM. The Town shall use the Starter House for the following purposes: a. The rental of cross-country skis and related equipment b. The service of packaged food and beverages c. As a warming house for cross-country skiers d. Daily cross-country lessons nd various outings 2. The monies raised by the Town through rentals, programs and food sales will fall short of the cost of operating the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation and therefore the Town will pay $10.00 rent to the District for the use of the Starter House for the purpose set forth herein. 3. Prior to using the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation, the Town will remove the carpet in the dining area of the Starter House and store same for the winter and re-install it prior to the time the Starter House is used by the Recreation District for the golf season. 4. Ski racks will be placed around the building and signs will be posted indicating that skiers should not lean their skis or poles against the Starter House. In addition, cross-country skiers will be prohibited from bringing their skis inside the House and the Town will post signs indicating same. 5. The Town will open the rest rooms in the facility only when an employee of the Town or Paragon Guides is present to supervise the use of the facility. The Town will be responsible for the cleaning, repair and maintenance of the facilitiy during the time set forth herein that the Town has possession of the premises. 6. The Town and Paragon Guides will produce and distribute a cross-country brochure to all those renting cross-country ski equipment at the Starter House. The Town shall pay fifty percent (50p) of the cost of reproduction. The brochure will contain information informing the public of the proper use of the golf course by cross-country skiers so as to minimize any damage to the golf course. 7. The Town will pay for seventy (70:) of the utility, water and sanitation costs for the term of this agreement and Paragon Guides will-pay thirty,percent (30%). 8. Any firewood utilized by the Town in the course of its cross-country ski operation shall be stored two feet from the building on the west side so as to prevent the structure from being nicked and scraped by wood. 9. Any damage to the Starter House caused by the negligence of the Town of Vail during its use of the facility as a cross-country ski operation will be repaired by the Town of Vail at the Town's cost prior to April 15, 1986. However, it is understood that should ary such damage be covered by the District's fire or casualty insurance, then the Town shall not be liable for such damage. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hand and seal the date first above written. TOWN OF VAIL, A Colorado municipal corporation Rondall V. Phillips VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body Robert W. Ruder 1986 VAIL REC. SUBSIDIES Oper. Revenues Less Eypen_,es User- Fee Tw Rev Exp Subsidy Gol f Course 78B,331 7B1,000 ( 7, -331 ) Clubhouse Debt 0 300,000 300,000 Tennis 3e,310 77 , 742 39,432 Golf Course Lease 0 70,000 70,000 Subtotal VMRD 826,641 1,22S,742 402,101 Golf Course Debt 0 272,000 Arena Opdr. 300,779 470,000 169,221 Arena Debt it -005,56S 205 Recreation Programs 2A5,787 5395126 293,339 Misc. Park: Debt it e50,OOO 850,000 World Cup, Champ., Coors 0 125,450 125,450 Subtotal TOV 546,566 2,462,144 1,915,078 TOTAL VAIL 1,771,2077 3,690,886 2,317,679 1 r TOV Golf Course Debt Arena Operations ; " ' VMRD Golf Course Lease Tennis Arena Debt A. . Clubhouse Debt Recreation Programs,,'' 77 11 - - ----5'-117•;_; I World Cup _ - _ _ ; '139 Championship . Coors -j -'j j - Misc. Park Debt