HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-10 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987
2:00 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Town of Vail Capital Projects Discussion
2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report
3. Information Update
4. Other
5. Executive Session - Land Negotiations for Interchange
Modifications
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987
2:00 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
2:00 1. Town of Vail Capital Projects Discussion
Charlie Wick
Action Requested of Council: Council direction needed
concerning short-term project and long-term project priority
lists.
Backqround Rationale: At the March 3, 1987 Council Work
Session, Council agreed to proceed with the tentative
process agenda concerning TOV capital projects. This will
be a long session to discuss Council policy on criteria,
what projects to focus on, and what further study is
needed.
Staff Recommendation: Provide policy direction for staff on
capital projects.
4:00 2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report
Peter Patten
4:10 3. Information Update
Ron Phillips
4:15 4. Other
4:20 5. Executive Session - Land Negotiations for Interchange
Modifications
TO: Ron Phillips
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 3, 1987
RE: Preliminary recommendations on how to proceed with
further evaluation of the Congress Hall proposal
The staff has had an opportunity to consult a number of nationally
known consulting firms following Tuesday's discussion of the
Congress Hall proposal. The purpose of these contacts were to
seek advice from experts on how to proceed with our evaluation of
the Congress Hall proposal. It was a consensus of the people we
contacted that the basic fundamental approach to evaluating a
facility of this nature involves three steps. These include:
Market Feasibility
Economic/Financial Assessment
Site/Programmatic Analysis
The market analysis is generally the first of these three steps to
be completed. Given the results of a thorough market analysis,
determination can be made as to whether it is reasonable to pursue
further study. The economic and site analysis will then provide
more specific information in terms of project feasibility.
The following provides more detailed information concerning each
of the three components of the convention center analysis:
1. Market Feasibility
The Tourism Techniques study provides a solid basis for a
thorough market analysis of a Congress Hall in Vail. Based
on our conversations with convention center feasibility
consultants, there is a need to further refine the capture
rate as projected for this facility. Generallly, two
additional steps need to be taken:
a. Competitive Market Analysis Within Vail
It is critical to determine what percentage of the
meeting market we are presently capturing. In addition,
close analysis of the existing market can more clearly
define the charateristics of groups who have already
used Vail for meetings or conventions. For example,
usage patterns already established in Vail relative to
seasonality, group size and type, lodging nd facility
needs, and a more clear understanding of business lost
for lack of adequate facilities will all supplement the
TT study.
b. Competitive Market Analysis in Region
Somewhat similar to the above mentioned analysis, the
focus of this study would be on competing resort
facilities in the region.
2. Economic/Financial Assessment
The economic/financial assessment of a convention facility
would include estimated building costs, expenses such as
marketing and O and M, anticipated revenues (both direct and
indirect), and financing alternatives. This analysis could
also include recommended management strategies such as how
its operation would interface with established entities
within the Town.
3. Site/Programmatic Analysis
This step would most logically be done concurrently with the
economic/financial assessment. In many respects, the
site/programmatic analysis is driven by the market
feasibility information. For example, the individual markets
for groups sizes will dictate the size of the facility,
number of break-out rooms, etc. Alternataive uses would also
be generated from the market study and refined during this
process. Critical issues in the site analysis include
environmental, planning (i.e. parking), transportation, and
proximity to the Town's bed base.
It should be understood that the information presented in.this
memorandum is the result of a limited amount of research conducted
this past week. It is based on information we have received from
experts in the field of preparing feasibility studies for
convention facilities.
While the fundamental approach to evaluating the feasibility of
this type of facility is universal, there are undoubtedly specific
issues in Vail that would need to be addressed. It would be our
recommendation that any further study initiated by the Town be
done in a comprehensive manner to address the multitude of
interrelated issues inolved in this process.
Planning and Environmental Commission
March 9, 1987
1:30 P.M. Site Visits
3:00 P.M. Public Hearinq
1. Approval of minutes of meeting of February 23.
2. Proposed revision to the Urban Design Guide Plan and a
request for an exterior alteration in order to construct
an addition to the Plaza Lodge building.
Applicant: Plaza Lodge Associates, Ltd.
3. A request for exterior alteration and for a density
control variance in order to construct an addition to
the Sitzmark Lodge. -
Applicant: Sitzmark Lodge/Bob Fritch
4. A request for a conditional use permit in order to
construct an addition to the Learning Tree Preschool
located at 129 North Frontage Road.
Applicant: Learning Tree Preschool
5. A request for front and side setback variances in order
to construct two dwelling units on Parcel A, a
resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17, Vail Village First
Filing.
Applicant: Michael Tennenbaum
6. A request for a front setback variance, a variance from
required roof slope, and an amendment to the Arterial
Business District circulation plan in order to construct
a building at 1031 South Frontage Road.
Applicant: Vail Commercial Partnership
RECD MAR - 4 1987
241 E. Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657
v /
c
"
CHAMBER FORUM L UN C H E O N
Date: March 10, 1987
Time: Cash Bar 11:30 Lunch at noon
Location: Marriott Mark Resort
Cost: 57.50 for members $8.50 for nor.-members
Come watch the P.I.I. Magazine sections that aired in
Northeast Ohio showingcas.ing Vail as a premier resort.
Don't miss this dynamic footage!
For reservations call Stella Cruz, ext. 13, by noon on
Monday, March 5.
*;Y***** k********~*yc**~r~k:k~c*ir*~c:~~c~c**~c*~kYc*;~* k~c~~k*YCxxxx *~c~c
B U S= N E S S AFTER HOUR S
Date: March 18, 1987
Time: 5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.
Given bv_: Eve Pieces of Vail and Memories
Located at the top of Bridge Street(318 Hanson Ranch Rd).
Bring your nor.-VRA friends-Complimentary beverages and
hors d'oeuvres will be served. Great 'Door Prizes!
CENTRAL RESERVATIONS • (303) 476-5677
MARKETINGiCHAMBER SERVICES • (303) 476-1000 • Denver Line 595.9488
AMERICAN SKI CLASSIC
1987 Schedule of Events
Friday, March 6 Registration begins at Vail Room, Lodge at Vail
Monday, March 9 10:15 Legends GS 1st Run, BC
11:30 Legends GS 2nd Run, BC
1:00 Grand Legends Race, BC
Tuesday, March 10 10:45 Legends Ski Down, Vail
11:00 Legends DH 1st Run, Vail
12:00 Legends DH 2nd Run, Vail
7:00 Legends Banquet (Black Tie) BC, Village Hall
Wednesday, March 11 10:00 Ford Cup 1st Round, BC
10:00 World Cup DH Training, Vail
7:00 Opening Ceremonies, Vail, International Finish
Stadium
Thursday, March 12 10:00 Ford Cup 2nd Round, BC
11:00 World Cup DH Training, Vail
1:30 Ford Cup Final Round, BC
3:30 European Tea Dance, BC, Village Hall
8:00 Wang Chung Concert, Dobson Arena (Tickets
$12.00 each)
Friday, March 13 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail
11:00 World Cup DH #1, Vail
7:00 Eagle's Nest Reception
Saturday, March 14 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail
11:00 World Cup DH #2, Vail
Sunday, March 15 10:45 Flag Ski Down, Vail
11:00 World Cup Super G, Vail
Rf U0 MAR - 5 1987
ALASKA
FLYFISHING EKPEDITIGiVS
Nt "Salmon, Trout, Steelhead Wilderness Outfitters"
March 4, 1987
Mr. Paul Johnson
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81658
Dear Paul and Council:
I am writing again because I am upset about government
policies and actions. After repeated calls to the managers
office I still am yet to have the call returned to me.
I might ad that he works for~the citizens of this community
and he is responsible to all of us.
About 1:00 on December 8, 1986 I witnessed Mr. Charlie
Wicks drive carelessly and dangerously and the result
was a ticked issued by Tom Sealy of the police department.
A very good source tells me today that the careless driving
ticket issued was eventually voided and I'd like an exp:la-inat.inn
as if it were me it never would have been voided. Is
this the way our government is run? Charlie might be
one great guy but he was in the wrong and the voiding
of that ticket was equally as wrong.
Members of the police department have been working to
cover a short staff during peak times of this season
and I am very surprised to see that there have been no
bonuses issued to these members.::--; There have been bonuses
issued to other employees and I don't see the justification
P.O. BOX 952, 5042 SNOWSHOE LANE, VAIL, COLORADO 81658, U.S.A. 303-476-4915
-2-
when in fact they have not been short staffed and were
only doing their job as in their job description.
I would also like to know why Mr. Phillips and his entire
family has been given a pass by the town to the health
club. For a man who is paid as much as he is and does
not answer to some of the citizens; he is granted too
much by the town.
There are several very concerned citizens and I think
this town should get a few things in order or it will
see a barrage of public and national criticism soon.
I don't want to see this town suffer adverse publicity
but unless things get fixed fast I know there are several
who are going to cause a lot of bad press.
A neighbor of mine has asked to hear tapes of the planning
departments meetings and decisions. He was denied and
told that he could not hear them. He called and is very
upset and is now seeking legal advice. Lets get with
it and be responsible to your citizens.
I look forward to your repy. I also would like all members
of council to read this letter and my most recent one.
I thank you and hope these letters will avoid what this
town does not need; bad publicity.
Sincerely,
Tom Ley
ti
cc; Mike Reid
RECD MAR - 5 1987
ALASKA
t FLYFISHING EXPEDITIONS
Nt "Salmon, Trout, Steelhead Wilderness Outfitters"
'Vo
March 4, 1987
Mr. Paul Johnson_
Vail Town Council
Town of Vail
Vail, Colorado 81658
Dear Paul and council:
I am writing so that this issue gets to be known by all
the members of council and that it becomes part of your
records. I, along with many of my neighbors are so upset
with some of the policies and-decisions that get approved
by the town that we just want a few of our concerns addressed.
Recently approval was given to a neighbor to allow him to operate
a commercial business out of his home and build an office
and business driveway to park all of his companies vehicles.
The traffic, the noise and .:the danger that is now thrust
upon our children is just unacceptable. There are days
when upwards of twenty or more vehicles go in and out
of this residence. We all own residential property and want
our neighborhood to remain just that. Many of us do.business
within our homes but not like a major property management
company and it's associated maid, linen, service and personell
trucks and vehicles. There have been numerous cars and trucks
stuck and blocking the road and they all ad tto)aserious problem
that the town still has not taken care of.
P.O. BOX 952, 5042 SNOWSHOE LANE, VAIL, COLORADO 81658, U.S.A. 303-476-4915
-2-
Main Gore Drive and the hill that services the upper
end of east Vail has been the cause of many accidents
and unless it is widened we are going to kill one of
our children. Since 1975 I've called, complained, and
bitched about that hill to every department that I thought
was responsible enough to assist. On two occasions I
have personally dug two of our past town managers out
of the snowbank and only then did it get widened by plows
but it never continued. Obviously this year has been
tolerable.
We want council to look into why this business, house
construction, office construction, driveways were approved
in our residential neighborhood. The owners of this
business and the associated governing departments have
not been very nice or courteous and that is not acceptable
to any of us.
I trust you will see that this matter will be taken care,
of before too long. When government sets guidelines
it is up to government to police not the citizens. I
know you are a responsible man and that council should
be sensitive to our concerns and we are going to let
you all take care of this before we go any further.
Sincerely,
Tom LeRoy
ti
cc; Mike Reed, Rick Plyman
REC'C MAR - 9 1987
EAGLE COUNTY
551 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631
(303)328-7311
March 5, 1987
f r .
Mr. Ron Phillips, Manager ` ...y.
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Ron:
This is to confirm that the Board of County
Commissioners has committed to contribute $100,000 towards the
completion of the new I-70 interchange near LionsHead in Vail.
This contribution will be in the 1988 Eagle County
Capital Budget and will be payable during the first quarter of
calendar 1988.
The Board is anxious to see this project completed
prior to the World Alpine Ski Championships in early 1989 and
will continue to support the efforts of the Town and the State
Highway Department to achieve this goal.
Respectfully,
EAGLE COUNTY
42-
Lee Metcalfe
Chief Administrative Officer
LM/lw
CC: Board of County Commissioners
Bart Skidmore, Finance Director
Doug Pilcher, Public Works Director
Larry Metternick, Engineer
Susie Vaughn, Comm. Development Director
K. T . Gazuni s, Economic Development Director (ECEDC)
Board of County Commissioners Assessor Clerk and Recorder Sheriff Treasurer
P.O. Box 850 P.O. Box 449 P.O. Box 537 P.O. Box 359 P.O. Box 479
Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631
r ;
10WH of voil
75 south frontage road office of the town manager
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
March 9, 1987
The Honorable Roy Romer
Governor
State Capitol Building
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60, Vested Property Rights
Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Governor Romer:
Please find attached letters sent a few weeks ago to Representative
Danny Williams and Senator Sally Hopper concerning the above
referenced Bills. We would appreciate your support of Senate Bill 45
as it now stands in the Senate as we feel it solves many of the
statutory problems concerning annexation which now exist.
We would appreciate your vociferous opposition to Senate Bill 60
concerning vested property rights as the Bill is unnecessary and
infringes dramatically on local government's right to accomplish
planning and zoning within their communities. If Senate Bill 60
happens to pass the House, we would encourage you to veto the Bill
when it comes to your desk.
Since y4.P Ronda11 *ip T
own Manager
RVP/bsc
Attachments
~~c : CML
tOWO Of Vail
75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Dan Williams
Colorado House of Representatives
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Mr. Williams:
The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation
Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the
Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and
Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should
these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B.
45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate
and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly
urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts
which might limit municipal annexation powers.
The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill
1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated
by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time
when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the
Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic
development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further,
The Honorable Dan Williams
February 10, 1987
Page 2
H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district
formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for
municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincere-
Pau
l R. Joh ston
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
town Doff nail
75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Sally Hopper
Colorado State Senator
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Senator Hopper:
The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation
Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the
Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and
Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should
these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B.
45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate
and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly
urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts
which might limit municipal annexation powers.
The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill
1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated
by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time
when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the
Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic
development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further,
The Honorable Sally Hopper
February 10, 1987
Page 2
H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district
formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for
municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincere -
Paul R. J¢hnston:.._.
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
IOWO of voil
75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Dan Williams
Colorado House of Representatives
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights
Dear Mr. Williams:
I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to
Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for
several reasons:
1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which
demands the solution proposed.
2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval
of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to
apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is
different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the
developer and the local government during the several stages of the
development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of
forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until
The Honorable Dan Williams
February 10, 1987
Page 2
the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals
needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which
benefits both the developer and the local community.
4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all
other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any
citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted.
5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the
issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of
subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now
burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be
built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals.
6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the
value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a
patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be
effective by any new comprehensive plan.
Sincere-l- y
\ 1
auT R. J o h rys ton
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
„ i,.
10WH of Vail
75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Sally Hopper
Colorado State,Senator
~St:ate Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights
Dear Senator Hopper:
I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to
Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for
several reasons:
1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which
demands the solution proposed.
2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval
of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to
apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is
different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the
developer and the local government during the several stages of the
development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of
forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until
~ L
The Honorable Sally Hopper
February 10, 1987
Page 2
the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals
needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which
benefits both the developer and the local community.
4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all
other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any
citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted.
5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the
issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of
subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now
burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be
built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals.
6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the
value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a
patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be
effective by any new comprehensive plan.
S i n c-e-r y
'-~a Jo nston
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
y RECD MAR - 9 1987,
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
3799 HIGHWAY 82 AREA CODE
P. O. DRAWER 2150 303
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 945-5491
March 6, 1987
Mr. Ron Phillips
Manager, Town of Vail
Vail, CO 81657
Re: I-70 Interchange
Dear Ron:
We had an productive session with an architect/planner con-
cerning the Holy Cross Electric Association site. At the end
of the meeting, it was our mutual agreement that the best use
of the property is as a landscaped entry into Vail.
The problem is that the Interchange reduces the options for
the remaining portion of the lot to about three: a fast food
operation, a service station, or a convenience store. These
are not the most desirable uses from the Town's viewpoint and
they are not uses that will command the proper price for the
remaining ground, from Holy Cross's viewpoint. The Inter-
change simply takes productive marketability out of the site.
We feel that the solution to the problem is for Holy Cross
Electric to sell the lot to the Town of Vail. To reflect our
willingness to contribute to the Town's effort in getting the
Interchange built, we are willing to discount the fair Market
Value by a significant number. Further, we can offer terms
which we feel should make the acquisition a relatively easy
one for the Town.
Using the recent Voliter sale as a guide, we can calculate a
transaction. The buyers paid $500,000 for that property,
with no commission involved. Calculating a 5% commission,
one arrives at a fair market value for the site of $525,000.
At 43.560 square feet, this comes to $12.05 per square foot.
Multiplying that number by the 53,582 square feet of the
Holy Cross site, we reach a fair market value of $645,663.10,
say, $645,000. Holy Cross would be willing to discount the
market value by 20%, to $516,000. We can offer terms of 10%
at 8.75 per cent. Annual payments would amount to approxi-
mately $57,000.
As we discussed in your offices, Holy Cross is a consumer
owned utility. We are obliged to represent the best interest
of all our members, as well as that of the communities which
we serve. We believe that the $129,000 discount, plus the
terms that we are offering, accomplish both those objectives.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Sincerely,
Davi 7s
President
DS/jt
cc: Ed Grange
~~~L 1 a, ~.et f
'cil ~_trv>Gllta~! :-creation District
E =rd of L"i rectors
r,:,rsday, t'arch 12, 1987, 3:00 P!
1. Call to order
2. Approval of Minutes 2112187 and 2/19/87
3. Jim Mlorter (3 minutes)
4. Cash flow report - Wick/Parzonko 10 minutes)
5. David Kanelli - VRA (10 miunutes)
A. Special Assessment - 5421.86
B. Management resource sweepstakes pool (see attached)
6. Celebrity Tennis Event - Rod Sherman (see attachead) (10
minutes)
7. Constructicn (20 minutes)
A. Change orders - additional costs
B. Loons report
C. Beck report
D. Draw request A7
8. Collins Agreement (see attached) (2 minutes)
9. Starter House Agreement-winter use - TOV (see attached)
(2 minutes)
10. Motio j,4 to approve tenant for restaurant (2 minutes)
11. Donations
A. Rotary Club (need letter)
B. Great Race
C. Crystal Ball - summer 10,88
12. Approval of PO's
EXECUTIVE SESSION
13. Vt•tRD/TOV joint meeting report - Garton & Lapin (see attached)
14. Director of Golf Evaluation - 10,87 Agreement
15. Director of Tennis evaluation - 1987 agreement
16. Adjournment
Attachments: Eiinutes 2/12/87 and 2/19/87
Liscio letter
Rod Sherman letter
Collins agreement
Starter House agreement
Gramshar,76,er letter
Ted Martin letter (great race)
VI2D/TOV financial information
Susie Vaughn - Eagle County Donation - FYI
M I t."JTES
RECULAP F. EMNG
VAIL tTTROPOLITAN P.ECF.EATION DISTRICT
February 12, 1937
Y-3- 1EP.S PRESUM Merv Lapin George Knox Tim Garton Bob Ruder
Fa,3ERS ABSM: Gail Molloy
CTFE6: MEIMP.S PP.ESENT: Pat Godson, Steve Satterstrom
CALL TO ORDEP.: Meeting was called to order at 3:05 PM
E.FPPOVAL OF KIMUTES: Garton moved to approve the minutes of 2/8187 and 2/15/87, second by
Lapin, passed unanimously.
1986 YTD Cash Balance: Dodson reviewed the District's financial position with the boasrd. In
1936 the District generated :1,254,144.09 and had expenditures of
$993,341.56 leaving income over expenditures of $275,802.10. Cash balance
as of 1-1-86 $62,395 bringing the totall income and cash balance to
$333,197.50. 5262,1-09.56 was transfered to the construction account
leavir:g the District with a cash balance of $75,787.97 as of 1-1-87-
Ruder arrives: 3:10 PM
Currently VMRD is overdrawn and can borrow money from the TOV at 8%
until their cash flow improves. Lapin requested Dodson to see if funds
can be borrowed from another source for less interest.
CLUBHOUSE P.EMDEL: A. Interior Decorators - tabled
B. Restaurant Lease proposals: Steve Satterstrom, Shirkie Evans, Bart
Garton, Dave Garton were present. The Board has received proposals
from three individuals: 1) Steve Satterstrom 2) Dave Garton, Bart Garton
& Evans and 3) Pat & Nitzi Rabin.
Dave Garton stated Satterstrom and he may possibly wish to combine
proposals. They have no formal proposal to present to the Board at -
this time and requested until 5 FM Friday to submit and combined proposal
or stay with their individual proposals. The Board granted this
extenticn.
Tim Garton stated he will withdraw from voting or. this matter due to
his relation with one of the potential lessees.
Lapin raised the question does the Board have an ethical and morale
problem with Pepi's proposal since the terms of the lease have changed.
What is U RD's obligations to Pepi to offer nogotiations with him again
since the deal has changed?
Ruder feels no obligation to Pepi, since the Board was always willing
to negotiate any terms with him. Knox does not feel any obligation
to open the negotiations again. Garton stated if we go back to Pepi
we must go back to korchowski too. He always felt Pepi was very
CLaiified, b-'t C1ffiCUIt to deal With. Garton Las no nrC_'Em allowing
rE;i to rEsubmit a prcposa1 under the n24: torT^.s. The 'rd sees no
prole- in sencina Pepi a letter to let him k.rcr+ the teal as chanced
and he car reapply if he so chores. Dave L Bart Garton and Evans all
leave.
C. Sackbauer Preposai: Rick Sackbauer, Peter Looms, Frank Payne and
Andy Beck all join the meeting. Sackbauer stated Phase 1 is complete
and Phase II is 9C*. complete per his proposal. Garton m de a motion
to approve the Sackbauer agreement in the amount Of 1:5,760, second by
Yncx and it passed unanimously.
M4erv questions paying for restaurant construction and wanted to know
if this would be passed along to the- lessee. Ruder and Knox stated
possibly, but not necessarily. Merv wants to Board to seek reimbursement
for all restaurant costs from. the future lessee.
G. Report on clubhouse/restaurant and approval Of all Expenditures
(see attached from Beck,. The column titled "other" represents 1TIRD
or the restaurant lessee. Knox rade a motion to approve the $56,216
on the Seck proposal, second by Garton - 3 yes Garton„ Knox & Ruder,
1 no Lapin. The motion passed.
E. Approval of Fifth Draw
Lapin would like Dodson to find out why in 1986 there was a shortfall
in collecting the general property taxes.
Lapin moved to approve the fifth draw, second by Knox and it passed
unanimously. The Board approved distribution of the sixth draw to
subcontractors by Beck.
F. Architect/Contractor Report. Looms rants some direction on what
color the Board wants the building painted. Knox will pick the color
for the building. Looms wants to know when and if they will be choosing
an interior decorator. The Board indicated they hope to select one.
Beck stated everything is moving along very smoothly. They are slightly
ahead of schedule.
Sackbauer's restaurant plan: The Board does not want the broom closet
to be built where the plan currently show. The plan must be revised
to show this space as a lounge. Sackbauer stated the health department
requires chemicals be stored in a seperate closet. The board has no
problem with Sackbauer redoing the plans to provide for the closet on
the main floor, but it cannot be located in the space it occupies
currently. Sackbauer will work on a revised plan for the Board.
Looms, Beck and Sackbauer leave.
LIQUOR LICEESE: The board would like to find out what the deadline dates would be to
attend the March liquor board hearing. The Board would like Dodson
to find out if the board is covered for liability if they apply for
a liquor license. Garton stronly urges the board to choose a restaurant
lessee so they can apply for the liquor license. If the board applies
for the license End then transfers it to the leassee, tFe t•o;:rC is still
held liable for the license durirg to lengthy transfer process. The
Board will not proceed with filling out tte liquor license ar%lication
at this time.
X-COU,TRY SKI CO[TRACT: Knox made a r..cticn to approve the contract with Paragon, second by Carton,
passed unanimously.
NO Nflti GOLF =TRACT: Torn Y,orchowsky joins the meeting. Tom handed out a profit and loss
statement for the 1985 tournament (see attached). Tom said the 1987
proceeds will be donated to the McLaughlin speed skating fund and the
blind skier program. The Eoard asked Kcrchowsky that next year he provide
the profit and loss statm_nt to them in a more tirrely fashion. Lapin
moved to approved the 1987 No game Golf contract, second by Garton,
passed unanimously.
JEPRY FORD IialTATIO.'LU Satterstror: stated he reserves 25" of the tee tires or. Friday, 50: of
CONTRACT: the tee times on Saturday ae,d 10CF of the tee times or, Sunday for Jerry
Ford Invitational Tournament. If their percentace is not used, he then
sells the times to the general public. Knox asked if there would be
an amateur round this year on Sunday? Dodson will find out. Knox wants
to give them Sunday, Monday and Tuesday and if there is an amateur round
then give them Saturday. Merv wants the 1986 profit and loss statement.
Dodson stated he has requested this in the past from the tournament
and has never received a copy. The Board would like the course to become
public on Tuesday as soon as the tournament is over. Merv feels dealing
?:ith public funds requires us to be concerned about how the JFI
distributes the money. Lapin wants to write JFI and ask for their budget
stating we are a public entity and legally reed disclosure. Garton
and Ruder feel the board members of the JFI are very reputable people
and do not feel this budget is necessary. The board wants the contract
to state they will not give the exclusive use on August 15, 1987, but
are willing to provide all the time JFI needs and request the budget
as part of the contract. The contract should also state, the Tuesday
after tournament play, the course will open to the public as soon as
tournament players have teed off hole number 9 or 5 PM. Four free
participant slots for 1'I?RD to assign to people to play should be put
in the contract. Put this item on the next agenda.
CO':PLIF:=isTA.RY 0LF/TEFMS Lapin made a motion to approve the attached list of individuals for
H.SSES. complimentary eolf and tennis passes, second by Knox, passes unanimously.
(see attached).
C. hUTIO.'{S: Echo Ranch. Garton made a motion to give Echo ranch two-foursome rounds
with carts, second by Knox and passed unanimously.
V; iL F.SSCCIATES-25 YUPS: Dodson stated trolley had indicated she would like to hold a celebration
at the nevi Clubhouse when FA holds their 25 year celebration.
V1:.D1TO161 JOINT E"=tTIa: Lapin stated the, two groups discussed existing and future programs.
Lapin made a motion to go into executive session to discuss a contract,
second by Carton, unanimous.
Tii AF7 LOCATION OF The Board wishes to male no changes at this time. The Board asked
V" :D 1:_ETIE:;S: Satterstrom to write press releases for WRD.
Ft:! L-TI!'.Z E-1:?LCYEE Th= EcErd k'OUlC' 1 i ke to s tay r::h ;.te `C V r. eri t sys tec,. Yruecer v;i 11 .
k:i„E S: CO E'eaiLdLlOf1S Gn, ~h15 ? fUll-:1('° r°_Cp'E and GCGSGR ni Il eVFlLc'`.2 B°R.
Garton raoe arc±icn te accept tr.e rerit increase :ased en the rarge,
seccr.d by Knox> Fassed unanir.,ously.
Pli wfv"•.SE C".DEPS: Lap=n rade a rc*_ien tc appreve the FC's as preserted> seconz by 6artor,
passed urar„ reu_1y.
YK:.D/TOY VANAEUOFT See attached Fhillips mmo and Rescluticn F;o. 2. Lapin rade a mction
AUZr-fiT (additional to zp-prove the Resolution tt'c. 2 and zccept the TOV pmposal of a rerth
it`.:): to morth r.arz_er~ert egreer.•er,t, se:ord ty k'.nox, passed ur.arir,wusly.
LE6.!.L SERYICES: The board would like to interview Collins and Ricer kSAP.
The bcard werts to meet r:ext Thursdsy, Febrvary 14, 191-37 at 3 PM to
oiscuss the restzurart lessee and ir.erveirr the zttorneys. Keed to
advertise this reetirtg.
CG'dTRACTS [30o a QOT: The discussicn of the Director of 6clf and Oirector of Ter.ris r:as tabled.
I,CztOJPJ-.7,1--KT: 6artcn rcved to adjourr, secer.d by Y.nax> unarirous. 7:00 PM
Ga-11 h,olloy
t! I t; "TES
REGULAR. F:=ETIF;S
VAIL FETPOPOLITAR F.ECREATIO?' DISTRICT
February 19, 1987
BOAP.D tOSEPS PRESENT: Merv Lapin Gail Molloy Tim Garton Bob Ruder George Knox
OTF:ERS PRESENT: Pat Dodson
CELL TO ORDER: M;eetina was called to order at 3:00 Pr
IKTERYIEII RESTAUP.ART Garton stated he mould like to decide'today on a restaurateur so they
APPLICANTS: can apply for the liquor license and not the board.
The Board interviewed Fat Rabin. She will supply the board with a copy
of their proposed menu and she will give her answer to the $91-0,000 or
rebate-ment of rent after she speaks to Nitzi.
The Board interviewed Garton, Garton & Evans.
They will pay $20,000 with a signed lease and $10,000 each year starting
in years 3-11. They want VMRD to pay 100' of roof shoveling and pay
interest on the security deposit.
Lapin leaves at 4:15 PM.
The Board interviewed Pick Sackbauer who was acting in Steve Satterstroms
behalf while he is out of town. Sackbauer would be Satterstroms manager
and Satterstrom will be the owner. The board wants to know if Satterstrom
will be paying $105,000 plus $45,000 or just the 51-05,000. Ruder will
contact Satterstrom when he returns to town tomorrow to clarify his
proposal.
The board made no decision on a lessee today. Ruder will be contacting
all the board members by phone for a timely decision. Note: Tim Garton
will not vote due to his relationship with one of the applicants.
IETERVIEW ATTOPNEYS The Board interviewed Larry Rider. Rider will charge a per hour rate
or a flat retainer fee ?•:ith a per hour cost after maximum on retainer.
Litigation is billed at a higher rate. John McHaffey his partner
represents many other cities. Larry worked for the TOV from 1976-62,
but currently has no connection with the Town. Sees no conflict in
working with the Town.
Garton leaves at 5:30 PM
Rider has 3 people in office who could answer VMRD questions. Statements
should be easy to read - they have just redone their billing system.
Letters v:culd go out fast. Other documents would depend on their size.
Gail Molloy leaves 5:t0 PM. No quorum present.
The C,iEI-d friar\'lEl:cd Collins. Ct ',he d ,trios Fe c-,;,-rEr.',I)- Serves
he only attends he Eagle Vail District's regular m_etires. Staff size
is 4 attorneys, 4 bacl'.-!.'C, ; paralegal, I Cier1ca1. Two attorneys are
special districts. Turn around time for documents is 1 week if all
issues are solved. Letter would take 1 day. He is in Vail at least
I day per week.
The board did not choose an attorney at this time.
DO::ATIONS: As a euorurr was not present this item was tabled.
ANDLIPIDENT: The meeting adliourr,ed at 6:00 PM
Gail ~:olloy, Secretary
Sul Z.C :?IL 7 5. CPSTCS PROG:.?.:
IN!'OR"rATZION SHEET
03JECTIVA,
Develop a major sweepstakes campaign that will leverage the
Vail destination name and generate for the Greater Vail Resort
Area an estimated total advertising exposure of $3.4 :.pillion.
STRATEGY:
Implemcnt a sweepstakes promotion program for the summer sea-
son in eight mnaior markets.
PROPOSED PACKAGE:
Summer Promotion
Rcsou.ccc mill r zcuirc r and Vail acti'.
_ies to be included in each ::ar"cet's price structure. en-
vision these travel packages will vary in quantity and 1cnrIn
of stay dependent upon the market and partner. Most Sisi:ifi-
cantly, we belicv_ it 15 i'pGrta::t to be 'Jre focused on Tami-
lics for su er.
room, nights (double and quad rooms)
--1233 one-day activity vouchers (bi e rental, golf,
tennis, horseback riding, or~=_-'Zcd Giking, fishing,
Vail special events, and `;,.cola rides.
(303 Gondola tickets :.avc been. contributed by VAI.)
JOINT PARTNERS:
Vail Resort Association Rucio Stations
Vail Associates, Inc. Car Rental Companies
Retailers Other Ground Operators
Airlines
,`'u1RKETS
Summer Promotion
Los Angelcs -
C1-.icag0
Washington, D.C.
San Diego
.St. Louis
Kansas City
Dallas
COLLI:\ S AL-IS-D COCKREL, P.C.
PAUL R COCKREL ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE
JAMES P. COLLINS 445 UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 129 13031 986-1551
ROBERT L. TIBBALS. JR. DENVER. COLORADO 80228
COLORADO WATS
1-800-354-5941
February 26, 1987
Board of Directors
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
292 West Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Board Members:
We, of course, are very pleased to be selected to serve as
the general counsel for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation Dis-
trict. We appreciate the confidence you have shown in us, and
will make every effort to live up to your expectations.
We understand the District Board does not believe it is
necessary for me to be at each of the Board meetings, but wishes
for me instead to be "on call" to serve as a need arises. We
have no objection to this arrangement, and, in accordance with
our previous proposal to you, we will simply work on an hourly
basis, fully documenting all time spent in our monthly bills.
We commit not to change our hourly billing rate through at
least December 31, 1987. We consider our employment to be an
employment "at will" and will accept termination upon written
notice from the District without any time delay.
We understand that pertinent files and records of the
District pertaining to legal issues will be transferred to our
office at the District's, or. its previous counsel's, earliest -
convenience. Of significant importance to us, at a minimum, are
the files pertaining to the following:
- District Formation
- Outstanding Contracts
- Easements, Leases and Other Property Interests
- Audits and Audit Representation Letters
- Outstanding Lawsuits
- Insurance, Bonds, Oaths of Office, Disclosure
Statements, etc.
- Bond Documents, Covenants, Trust Agreements, etc.
- Other Pertinent Files
Other persons with whom the District will have contact are
Sue Blair, my paralegal assistant, and Robert Tibbals, my
partner with whom I work most closely regarding Eagle County
district matters. Of course, any member of our firm is always
available to the staff or Board of the District.
COLLIN S AN -D COCKREL, P.C.
Board of Directors
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
February 26, 1987
Page Two
If this complies with your understanding of our agreement,
please execute below and return a copy at your convenience.
Sincerely,
COLLINS AND COC=- L, P.C.
James P. Collins
JPC/sb
Accepted by the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District this
day of , 1987.
VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION
DISTRICT
By:
Title:
AGREEfM
STARTER HOUSE - 1986/87 VIKTER USE
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
(*the Town") and the VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body
("the District") on January 8, 1986.
WHEREAS, the District presently leases the building on the Vail Golf Course commonly known
as the Starter House as well as the golf course itself from the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Town in conjunction with Paragon Guides wishes -to utilize the Starter House and
the Golf Course for the 1986/1987 ski season for a cross-country ski operation operated by the
Town for the benefit of the visitors and residents of the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the District is willing to allow the Town to utilize the Starter House facility,
the Golf Course and the cross-country ski tracks which the District sets on the Golf Course,
for such purposes under the terms and conditions as are set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises herein contained, the parties
mutually agree as follows:
1. The Town will have the right to use the Starter House, the Golf Course and the tracks
set by the District on the Golf Course from December 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987 on the following
days and at the following times: Sunday through Thursday from 9 AM to 4 PM. Paragon guides
will have the right to use the Starter House Friday and Saturday from 9 AM to 4 PM.
The Town shall use the Starter House for the following purposes:
a. The rental of cross-country skis and related equipment
b. The service of packaged food and beverages
c. As a warming house for cross-country skiers
d. Daily cross-country lessons nd various outings
2. The monies raised by the Town through rentals, programs and food sales will fall short
of the cost of operating the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation and therefore the
Town will pay $10.00 rent to the District for the use of the Starter House for the purpose set
forth herein.
3. Prior to using the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation, the Town will remove
the carpet in the dining area of the Starter House and store same for the winter and re-install
it prior to the time the Starter House is used by the Recreation District for the golf season.
4. Ski racks will be placed around the building and signs will be posted indicating that
skiers should not lean their skis or poles against the Starter House. In addition, cross-country
skiers will be prohibited from bringing their skis inside the House and the Town will post signs
indicating same.
5. The Town will open the rest rooms in the facility only when an eimployee of the Town or
Paragon Guides is present to supervise the use of the facility. The Town will be responsible
for the cleaning, repair and maintenance of the facilitiy during the time set forth herein that
the Town has possession of the premises.
6. The Town and Paragon Guides will produce and distribute a cross-country brochure to all
those renting cross-country ski equipment at the Starter House. The Town shall pay fifty percent
(5000) of the cost of reproduction. The brochure will contain information informing the public
of the proper use of the golf course by cross-country skiers so as to minimize any damage to
the golf course.
7. The Town will pay for seventy (70:) of the utility, water and sanitation costs for the
term of this agreement and Paragon Guides will pay thirty percent (3000).
8. Any firewood utilized by the Town in the course of its cross-country ski operation shall
be stored two feet from the building on the west side so as to prevent the structure from being
nicked and scraped by wood.
9. Any damage to the Starter House caused by the negligence of the Town of Vail during its
use of the facility as a cross-country ski operation will be repaired by the Town of Vail Zt
the Town's cost prior to April 15, 1986. However, it is understood that should ar.y such damage
be covered by the District's fire or casualty insurance, then the Town shall not be liable for
such damage.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hand and seal the date first above
written.
TOWN OF VAIL, A Colorado municipal corporation
P.ondall V. Phillips
VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT,
a Colorado quasi-governmental body
Robert W. Ruder
1986 VAIL REC. SUDSIDIES
Oper. Revenues Le=_s Expenses
User- Fee Ta;;
Rev Exp Subsidy
Go l f Course 788 , w i 7S1,000 ( 7,331)
Clubhouse Debt O 300,000 300,000
Tennis 58,310 77,742 39,472
Golf Course Lease 0 70,000 70,00c)
Subtotal VNRD 826,641 1,22S,742 402,101
Golf Course Debt 0 272,000 272,000
Arena Oper. 300,779 470yci00 169,221
Arena Debt 0
2ti~.-
~68~?_,OnB
Recreation Programs 2;5,787 539,126 293,339
Misc. Park: Debt 0 850,OOO e50,000
World Cup, Champ., Coors 0 125,450 125,450
Subtotal TOV 546,566 2,462,144 1,915,578
TOTAL VAIL 1,373,207. 3,690,886 2,317,679
f l
' TOV Golf Course Debt
Arena Operations
a'•.
._~1" ~ VhiRD Golf Course Lease
Tennis
Arena Debt
' Clubhouse Debt
. - =
_
_ _ - - - - ---__I
Recreation Programs.
ail - - - - - - - - - i I World Cup
'89 Championship
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -G Coors
;j 1'" Misc. Park Debt
/O
REC'C MAR - 9 1987:
EAGLE COUNTY
551 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631
(303) 328-7311
March 5, 1987
x
Mr. Ron Phillips, Manager
TOWN OF VAIL
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Ron:
This is to confirm that the Board of County
Commissioners has committed to contribute $100,000 towards the
completion of the new I-70 interchange near LionsHead in Vail.
This contribution will be in the 1988 Eagle County
Capital Budget and will be payable during the first quarter of
calendar 1988.
The Board is anxious to see this project completed
prior to the World Alpine Ski Championships in early 1989 and
will continue to support the efforts of the Town and the State
Highway Department to achieve this goal.
Respectfully,
EAGLE COUNTY
Lee Metcalfe
Chief Administrative Officer
LM/lw
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Bart Skidmore, Finance Director
Doug Pilcher, Public Works Director
Larry Metternick, Engineer
Susie Vaughn, Comm. Development Director
K. T . Gazuni s, Economic Development Director (ECEDC)
Board of County Commissioners Assessor Clerk and Recorder Sheriff Treasurer
P.O. Box 850 P.O. Box 449 P.O. Box 537 P.O. Box 359 P.O. Box 479
Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Eagle, Colorado 81631
town of mil
75 south frontage road office of the town manager
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
March 9, 1987
The Honorable Roy Romer
Governor
State Capitol Building
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60, Vested Property Rights
Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Governor Romer:
Please find attached letters sent a few weeks ago to Representative
Danny Williams and Senator Sally Hopper concerning the above
referenced Bills. We would appreciate your support of Senate Bill 45
as it now stands in the Senate as we feel it solves many of the
statutory problems concerning annexation which now exist.
We would appreciate your vociferous opposition to Senate Bill 60
concerning vested property rights as the Bill is unnecessary and
infringes dramatically on local government's right to accomplish
planning and zoning within their communities. If Senate Bill 60
happens to pass the House, we would encourage you to veto the Bill
when it comes to your desk.
Since y,
Rondall V. Phil ips
Town Manager
RVP/bsc
Attachments
b CC : CM L
laUi ~j
i
r ~t
At
10WH of voil 1~
75 south frontage road • vail, Colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Dan Williams
Colorado House of Representatives
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Mr. Williams:
The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation
Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the
Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and
Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should
these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B.
45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate
and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly
urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts
which might limit municipal annexation powers.
The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill
1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated
by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time
when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the
Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic
development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further,
The Honorable Dan Williams
February 10, 1987
Page 2
H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district
formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for
municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincer_~
Paul R. Joh ston
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
10WO of nail
75 south frontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Sally Hopper
Colorado State Senator
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 45 - Municipal Annexation Restrictions
Dear Senator Hopper:
The Town of Vail supports Senate Bill 45, Municipal Annexation
Restrictions, so long as the compromise amendments to be offered to the
Senate Local Government Committee by the Colorado Municipal League and
Colorado Counties, Inc. are incorporated into the Bill. However, should
these amendments not become part of the Bill, we urge the defeat of S.B.
45. The Town of Vail believes the suggested amendments are appropriate
and protect the interests of the various parties involved. We strongly
urge you resist any other amendments to the Bill or any other efforts
which might limit municipal annexation powers.
The Town of Vail would also like to express its opposition to House Bill
1146 - Municipal Annexation Moratorium. The two year moratorium mandated
by the Bill does not represent good public or economic policy. At a time
when economic development is so important to the State of Colorado, the
Town believes that prohibiting use of one of the major economic
development tools available to municipalities makes no sense. Further,
The Honorable Sally Hopper
February 10, 1987
Page Z
H.B. 1146 fails to place a similar moratorium on special district
formations and inclusions which would cause real problems for
municipalities and citizens in unincorporated areas.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Since
Paul R. Johnston,-
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
• ~ilcc rn' NG'11-nC C P11^ U`,`
.v ,
10WO of voil
75 south frontage road • vail, Colorado 81657. • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
The Honorable Dan Williams
Colorado House of Representatives
State Capitol Building
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights
Dear Mr. Williams:
I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to
Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for
several reasons:
1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which
demands the solution proposed.
2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval
of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to
apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is
different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the
developer and the local government during the several stages of the
development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of
forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until
The Honorable Dan Williams
February 10, 1987
Page 2
the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals
needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which
benefits both the developer and the local community.
4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all
other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any
citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted.
5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the
issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of
subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now
burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be
built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals.
6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the
value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a
patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be
effective by any new comprehensive plan.
Sin4.J ` r
auT Roh ton
Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
It
towgo 75 south fr
ontage road • vail, colorado 81657 • (303) 476-7000
office of the mayor
February 10, 1987
bucae1:_, JUi
The Honorable Sally Hopper
Colorado State:Senator.
State Capitol Bui 1 ding
200 East Colfax
Denver, Colorado 80203
RE: Senate Bill 60 - Vested Property Rights
Dear Senator Hopper:
I am writing to communicate to you the Town of Vail's strong opposition to
Senate Bill 60, Vested Rights. The Town of Vail opposes this Bill for
several reasons:
1. No problem of statewide significance has been identified which
demands the solution proposed.
2. The proposal requires property rights to "vest" on the approval
of a "site-specific development plan". This proposal will be difficult to
apply statewide. What constitutes a site-specific development plan is
different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
3. Most major developments evolve in discussions between the
developer and the local government during the several stages of the
development and review process. The proposal has a practical effect of
forcing local governments to withhold all approvals for the project until
- L
The Honorable Sally Hopper
February 10, 1987
Page Z
the last possible time thus denying the developer the interim approvals
needed for financing, and eliminating the discussion process which
benefits both the developer and the local community.
4. If all key decisions on a project must be made at one stage, all
other decision points in the process will be rendered meaningless, and any
citizen input at those other public hearings will be wasted.
5. Current law allows for vesting and property rights prior to the
issuance of building permits. The best example is the approval of
subdivisions. However, many communities on the West Slope are now
burdened with subdivisions which have been approved but may never be
built. This situation should not extend to all development proposals.
6. Vesting property rights on unbuilt projects would diminish the
value of comprehensive planning, since those properties would form a
patchwork throughout the planning jurisdiction which would not be
effective by any new comprehensive plan.
Since y,.
~Pa Jo nston
.Mayor
PRJ/LAE/bsc
y. RECD MAR - 9 1987;
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
3799 HIGHWAY 82 AREA CODE
P. O. DRAWER 2150 303
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 9455491
March 6, 1987
Mr. Ron Phillips
Manager, Town of Vail
Vail, CO 81657
Re: I-70 Interchange
Dear Ron:
We had an productive session with an architect/planner con-
cerning the Holy Cross Electric Association site. At the end
of the meeting, it was our mutual agreement that the best use
of the property is as a landscaped entry into Vail.
The problem is that the Interchange reduces the options for
the remaining portion of the lot to about three: a fast food
operation, a service station, or a convenience store. These
are not the most desirable uses from the Town's viewpoint and
they are not uses that will command the proper price for the
remaining ground, from Holy Cross's viewpoint. The Inter-
change simply takes productive marketability out of the site.
We feel that the solution to the problem is for Holy Cross
Electric to sell the lot to the Town of Vail. To reflect our
willingness to contribute to the Town's effort in getting the
Interchange built, we are willing to discount the fair Market
Value by a significant number. Further, we can offer terms
which we feel should make the acquisition a relatively easy
one for the Town.
Using the recent Voliter sale as a guide, we can calculate a
transaction. The buyers paid $500,000 for that property,
with no commission involved. Calculating a 5% commission,
one arrives at a fair market value for the site of $525,000.
At 43.560 square feet, this comes to $12.05 per square foot.
Multiplying that number by the 53,582 square feet of the
Holy Cross site, we reach a fair market value of $645,663.10,
say, $645,000. Holy Cross would be willing to discount the
market value by 20%, to $516,000. We can offer terms of 10%
at 8.75 per cent. Annual payments would amount to approxi-
mately $57,000.
As we discussed in your offices, Holy Cross is a consumer
owned utility. We are obliged to represent the best interest
of all our members, as well as that of the communities which
we serve. We believe that the $129,000 discount, plus the
terms that we are offering, accomplish both those objectives.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Sincerely,
I
Davi oa
President
DS/jt
cc: Ed Grange
AWN
"a . 1 F'_tro:;o i i tan ;ecreati on Di stri ct
B =rd of Directors
ih,:rsday, March 12, 1987, 3:00 P!i
1. Call to order
2. Approval of Minutes 2112187 and 2/19/87
3. Jim t1orter (3 minutes)
4. Cash fl o~vi report - k' i ck/Parzonko 10 minutes)
5. David Kanelli - VRA (10 miunutes)
A. Special Assessment - $421.86
B. Management resource sweepstakes pool (see attached)
6. Celebrity Tennis Event - Rod Sherman (see attached) (10
minutes)
7. Construction (20 minutes)
A. Change orders - additional costs
B. Looms report
C. Beck report
D. Draw request #7
8. Collins Agreement (see attached) (2 minutes)
9. Starter House Agreement-winter use - TOV (see attached)
(2 minutes)
10. MotioN to approve tenant for restaurant (2 minutes)
11. Donations
A. Rotary Club (need letter)
B. Great Race
C. Crystal Ball - summer 1988
12. Approval of PO's
EXECUTIVE SESSION
13. VMRD/TOV joint meeting report - Garton & Lapin (see attached)
14. Director of Golf Evaluation - 10,87 Agreement
15. Director of Tennis evaluation - 1987 agreement
16. Adjournment
Attachments: Ilinutes 2/12/87 and 2/19/87
Liscio letter
Rod Sherman letter
Collins agreement
Starter House agreement
Gramsharmmer letter
Ted Martin letter (great race)
VI•JRD/TOV financial information
Susie Vaughn - Eagle County Donation - FYI
M I MUTES
REGULAR. l=TING
VAIL kTTROPOLITAN P.EUTATION DISTRICT
February 12, 1987
1-12-ZEP.S PRESEKM Merv Lapin George Knox Tim, Garton Bob Ruder
F-aWERS ABSENT: Gail Molloy
OTTER k.~:~EPS PRESENT: Pat Dodson, Steve Satterstrom
ULL TO OP.DEP,: Meeting was called to order at 3:05 PM
E.FPPOVAL OF KIMMS: Garton moved to approve the minutes of 2/8/87 and 2/15/67, second by
Lapin, passed unanimously.
1986 YTD Cash Balance: Dodson reviewed the District's financial position with the boasrd. In
1996 the District generated $1,254,144.09 and had expenditures of
;998,341.56 leaving income over expenditures of $275,802.10. Cash balance
as of 1-1-86 $62,?95 bringing the totall income and cash balance to
$338,197.50. 5262,409.56 was transfered to the construction account
leaving the District with a cash balance of $75,787.97 as of 1-1-87._,
Ruder arrives: 3:10 PM
Currently VMRD is overdrawn and car, borrow money from the TOV at 6%
until their cash flow improves. Lapin requested Dodson to see if funds
can be borrowed from another source for less interest.
CLUBHOUSE REMODEL: A. Interior Decorators - tabled
B. Restaurant Lease proposals: Steve Satterstrom, Shirkie Evans, Bart
Garton, Dave Garton were present. The Board has received proposals
from three individuals: 1) Steve Satterstrom 2) Dave Garton, Bart Garton
& Evans and 3) Pat & Nitzi Rabin.
Dave Garton stated Satterstrom and he may possibly wish to combine
proposals. They have no formal proposal to present to the Board at -
this time and requested until 5 FM Friday to submit and combined proposal
or stay with their individual proposals. The Board granted this
extentien.
Tim Garton stated he will withdraw from voting on this matter due to
his relation with one of the potential lessees.
Lapin raised the question does the Board have an ethical and morale
problem with Pepi's proposal since the terns of the lease have changed.
What is VMRD's obligations to Pepi to offer negotiations with him again,
since the deal has changed?
Ruder feels no obligation to Pepi, since the Board was always willing
to negotiate any terns with him. Knox does not feel any obligation
to open the negotiations again. Garton stated if we go back to Pepi
we rust go back to korchowski too. He always felt Pepi was very
gLallfied, IL-,;-,,t difficult to deal with. Garton has no prc:lE- allowing
PEp1 to rEsubr.: t a proposal under the nev.. tEr-.s. The ~-'G=_rc sees nc
problem in sencina Pepi a letter tc let him krcw the deal `as chanced
and he car: rEapply if he so choses. Dave L Eart Garton and Evans all
leave.
C. Sackbauer Proposal: Rick Sackbauer, Peter Looms, Frank PayTE and
Andy Beck all join the meeting. Sackbauer stated Phase 1 is complete
and Phase II is 90A complete per his proposal. Garton made a motion
to approve the Sackbauer agreement in the amount of $2,750, second by
ftc x and it passed unanimously.
Merv questions paying for restaurant construction and wanted to know
if this would be passed along to the- lessee. Ruder and Knox stated
possibly, but not necessarily. Merv wants to Board to seek reimbursement
for all restaurant costs from the future lessee.
D. Report on clubhouse/restaurant and approval of all expenditures
(see attached from Beck). The column titled "other" represents VMRD
or the restaurant lessee. Knox made a motion to approve the $56,216
on the Beck proposal, second by Garton - 3 yes Garton, Knox L Ruder,
1 no Lapin. The notion passed.
E. Approval of Fifth Draw -
Lapin would like Dodson to find out why in 1986 there was a shortfall
in collecting the general property taxes.
Lapin moved to approve the fifth draw, second by Knox and it passed
unanimously. The Board approved distribution of the sixth draw to
subcontractors by Beck.
F. Architect/Contractor Report. Looms karts some direction on what
color the Board wants the building painted. Knox will pick the color
for the building. Looms hunts to know when and if they will be choosing
an interior decorator. The Board indicated they hope to select one.
Beck stated everything is moving along very smoothly. They are slightly
ahead of schedule.
Sackbauer's restaurant plan: The Board does not want the broom closet
to be built where the plan currently show. The plan must be revised
to show this space as a lounge. Sackbauer stated the health department
requires chemicals be stored in a seperate closet. The board has no
problem with Sackbauer redoing the plans to provide for the closet on
the main floor, but it cannot be located in the space it occupies
currently. Sackbauer will work on a revised plan for the Board.
Looms, Beck and Sackbauer leave.
LIQUOR LICEPSE: The board would like to find out what the deadline dates would be to
attend the March liquor board hearing. The Board would like Dodson
to find out if the board is covered for liability if they apply for
a liquor license. Garton stronly urges the board to choose a restaurant
lessee so they can apply for the liquor license. If the board applies
for the license and then transfers it to the leassee, the t•osrd is still
held liable for the lice.^se durir:g the lencthy transfer process. The
Eoard Ni11 net proceed with filling out Vne liquor license application
at this time.
X-COU',TRY SKI CON7UCT: Knox made a motion to approve the contract with Paragon, second by Garton,
passed unanimously.
KO WME GOLF CONTRACT: Tom Y.orchowsky joins the meeting. Tom handed out a profit and loss
statement for the 1985 tournament (see attached). Tom said the 1987
proceeds will be donated to the McLaughlin speed skating fund and the
blind skier program. The Eoard asked Kcrchowsky that next year he provide
the profit and less statment to them in a more tirrely fashion. Lapin
moved to approved the 1987 ho Name Golf contract, second by Garton,
passed unanimously.
JcPRY FORD IiWITATI0'AL Satterstrom stated he reserves 2E" of the tee times on Friday, 50R of
CO't-MACT: the tee times on Saturday and 10CF of the tee tires on Sunday for Jerry
Ford Invitational Tournament. If their percentace is not used, he then
sells the times to the general public. Knox asked if there would be
an amateur round this year on Sunday? Dodson will find out. Knox wants
to give them Sunday, Monday and Tuesday and if there is an amateur round
then give them Saturday. Merv wants the 1986 profit and less statement.
Dodson stated he has requested this in the past from the tournament
and has never received a copy. The Board would like the course to become
public on Tuesday as soon as the tournament is over. Merv feels dealing
with public funds requires us to be concerned about how the JFI
distributes the money. Lapin wants to write JFI and ask for their budget
stating we are a public entity and legally reed disclosure. Garton
and Ruder feel the board members of the. JFI are very reputable people
and do not feel this budget is necessary. The board rants the contract
to state they will not give the exclusive use on August 15, 1987, but
are willing to provide all the time JFI needs and request the budget
as part of the contract. The contract should also state, the Tuesday
after tournament play, the course will open to the public as soon as
tournament players have teed off hole number 9 or 5 PM. Four free
participant slots for V RD to assign to people to play should be put
in the contract. Put this item on the next agenda.
CC':PLIr_1iTA.RY E'JLF/TEE;.IS Lapin made a motion to approve the attached list of individuals for
FASSES: complimentary Golf and tennis passes, second by Knox, passes unanimously.
(see attached).
V.0"ATIO;S: Echo Ranch. Garton made a motion to give Echo ranch two-foursomme rounds
with carts, second by Knox and passed unanimously.
Vt'.!L ASSOCIATES-25 YE1'.PS: Dodson stated t;olloy had indicated she would like to hold a celebration
at the nevr Clubhouse when VA holds their 25 year celebration.
JaIfT F_ttIra: Lapin stated the, two groups discussed existing and future programs.
Lapin made a r::otion to go into executive session to discuss a contract,
second by Garton, unanimous.
T1:-:= AED LOCATION OF The Board wishes to make no changes at this time. The Board asked
Y`::`.D f:_ETIfi,"-S: Satterstrom to write press releases for WRD.
FULL-TI'E2 -n:'.''LOTEE The Board mould like to stay rah the TH merit syste,m. K.ruecer will
k:AZES: do evaluations cn his 3 full-tire people and Dodscn kill evaluate Sen.
Garton rade a r.ticn to accept the merit increase based on the range,
second by Knox, passed unanimously.
PU^;F{ASE OPLEPS: Lapin made a rc*_ion to approve the PC's as presented, second by Garton,
passed unanimously.
VYaD/TOV Ev,tiAGEWDT See attached Phillips memo and Resolution No. 2. Lapin made a motion
AUIE~ItT (additional to approve the Resolution No. 2 and accept the TOV proposal of a month
ite to month manacer:,ent agreement, second by Knox, passed unanimously.
LEGAL SERVICES: The board would like to interview Collins and Rider ASAP.
The board hunts to meet next Thursday, February 19, 1987 at 3 PM to
discuss the restaurant lessee and interveiw the attorneys. Need to
advertise this meeting.
CO'N'TRACTS DOG fi DOT: The discussion of the Director of Golf and Director of Tennis was tabled.
ADJOUPWIC- NT: Garton moved to adjourn, second by Knox, unanimous. 7:00 PM
Gail Nolloy
MINUTES
P.EGULAR VEETIHS
VAIL F =TP.CPOLITAN RLCREf,TION DISTRICT
February 19, 19087
BOAP.D ~DSEPS PRESENT: Merv Lapin. Gail Molloy Tim Garton Bob Ruder George Knox
OTHM PRESENT: Pat Dodson
ULL TO ORDER: Meetina was called to order at 3:00 PM
IKfERYIEW REESTAUP.ANT Garton stated he would like to decide-today on a restaurateur so they
APPLICANTS: can apply for the liquor license and not the board.
The Board interviewed Pat Rabin. She will supply the board with a copy
of their proposed menu and she will give her answer to the $90,000 or
rebate-ment of rent after she speaks to Nitzi.
The Board interviewed Garton, Garton & Evans.
They will pay £20,000 with a signed lease and $10,000 each year starting
in years 3-11. They want VMRD to pay 100'. of roof shoveling and pay
interest on the security deposit.
Lapin leaves at 4:15 PM.
The Board interviewed Pick Sackbauer who was acting in Steve Satterstroms
behalf while he is cut of town. Sackbauer would be Satterstroms manager
and Satterstrom will be the owner. The board wants to know if Satterstrom
will be paying $105,0:10 plus $45,000 or just the $105,000. Ruder will
contact Satterstrom when he returns to town tomorrow to clarify his
proposal.
The board made no decision on a lessee today. Ruder will be contacting
all the board members by phone for a timely decision. Note: Tim Garton
will not vote due to his relationship with one of the applicants.
IHT'ERVIEW ATTORNEYS The Board interviewed Larry Rider. Rider will charge a per hour rate
or a flat retainer fee 4.rith a per hour cost after naximum on retainer.
Litigation is billed at a higher rate. John hicNaffey his partner
represents many other cities. Larry worked for the TOY from 1976-E2,
but currently has no connection with the Town. Sees no conflict in
working with the Town.
Garton leaves at 5:30 PM
Rider has 3 people in office v:ho could answer VMRD questions. Statements
should be easy to read - they have just redone their billing system.
Letters would go out fast. Other documents would depend on their size.
Gail Molloy leaves 5:t0 PH. No quorum present.
The 6card interviEwed v':- COilins. Of the districts F.e cxrEntly serves
he only attends the Eagle Fail District's regular ne-e-tings. Staff size
is 4 attorneys, 4 tack-up, : paralegal, i clerical. Two attorneys are
special districts. Turn around time for documents is 1 week if all
issues are solved. Letter would take I day. He is in Vail at least
I day per week.
The board did not choose an attorney at this time.
M ATIONS: As a quorum was not present this item was tabled.
AXOUNKEI'M: The meeting adliourned at 6:00 PM
Gail holloy, Secretary
A!L 87 S'.. UPST:~::LS PRO i.'.''f
INFOiZ:u1TiON SHEET
OBJECTIVE:
Develop a major sweepstakes campaign that will leverage the
Vail destination name and generate for the Greater Vail Resort
Area an estimated total advertising cxposurc of $3.4 ;.million.
STRATEGY:
Implement a sweepstakes promotion program. for the summer sea-
son in eight .major markets.
PROPOSED PACKAGE:
Summer Pro-motion
_ Res o;.rccc w-i I r.: cuir _ r _ anal Va,1 al.ti'.
1cs to CC 1r-,eluded in each :.:ar;:ez s pr1ZC structure. C
vision these travel packages will vary in quantity and long
of stay dependcnt upon the market and partner. ?lost s_s, nifi-
cantly, we believe it is im.po ta.t to be -orc.focused cn fami-
lies for summer.
--1200 room nights (double and quad rooms)
--1233 one-day activity vouchers (bi4ke rental, golf,
tennis, horseback riding, orga-izcd hiking, fishing,
Vail special events, and - Bola rides.
(800 Gondola tickets 'r:avc bL_n con~ributed by VAI.)
JOINT PAR NERS :
Vail Resort Association Cu~io Stations
Vail Associates, Inc. Car Rental Co-panics
Retailers Other Ground Operators
Airlines
LIL,%RKETS
Sumer Promotion
Los Angeles -
C iCago
Washington, D.C.
San Diego
.St. Louis
Kansas City
Dallas
COLLINS AND COCKREL, P.C.
PAJL R. COCKREL ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE
JAMES P. COLLINS 445 UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 129 (3031 986-1551
ROBERT L. TIBBALS. JR. DENVER. COLORADO 80228
COLORADO WATS
1.800-354-5941
February 26, 1987
Board of Directors
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
292 West Meadow Drive
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Board Members:
We, of course, are very pleased to be selected to serve as
the general counsel for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation Dis-
trict. We appreciate the confidence you have shown in us, and,
will make every effort to live up to your expectations.
We understand the District Board does not believe it is
necessary for me to be at each of the Board meetings, but wishes
for me instead to be "on call" to serve as a need arises. We
have no objection to this arrangement, and, in accordance with
our previous proposal to you, we will simply work on an hourly
basis, fully documenting all time spent in our monthly bills.
We commit not to change our hourly billing rate through at
least December 31, 1987. We consider our employment to be an
employment "at will" and will accept termination upon written
notice from the District without any time delay.
We understand that pertinent files and records of the
District pertaining to legal issues will be transferred to our
office at the District's, or. its previous counsel's, earliest -
convenience. Of significant importance to us, at a minimum, are
the files pertaining to the following:
- District Formation
- Outstanding Contracts
- Easements, Leases and Other Property Interests
- Audits and Audit Representation Letters
- Outstanding Lawsuits
- Insurance, Bonds, Oaths of Office, Disclosure
Statements, etc.
- Bond Documents, Covenants, Trust Agreements, etc.
- Other Pertinent Files
Other persons with whom the District will have contact are
Sue Blair, my paralegal assistant, and Robert Tibbals, my
partner with whom I work most closely regarding Eagle County
district matters. Of course, any member of our firm is always
available to the staff or Board of the District.
COLLINS AND COCKREL, P.C.
Board of Directors
Vail Metropolitan Recreation District
February 26, 1987
Page Two
If this complies with your understanding of our agreement,
please execute below and return a copy at your convenience.
Sincerely,
COLLINS AND LOCI=-L, P.C.
James P. Collins
JPC/sb
Accepted by the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District this
day of , 1987.
VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION
DISTRICT
By:
Title:
AGREE EKT
STARTER HOUSE - 1986/87 VIKTER USE
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation
('the Town") and the VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-governmental body
("the District") on January 8, 1986.
WHEREAS, the District presently leases the building on the Vail Golf Course commonly known
as the Starter House as well as the golf course itself from the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Town in conjunction with Paragon Guides wishes -to utilize the Starter House and
the Golf Course for the 1986/1987 ski season for a cross-country ski operation operated by the
Town for the benefit of the visitors and residents of the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the District is willing to allow the Town to utilize the Starter House facility,
the Golf Course and the cross-country ski tracks which the District sets on the Golf Course,
for such purposes under the terms and conditions as are set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises herein contained, the parties
mutually agree as follows:
1. The Town will have the right to use the Starter House, the Golf Course and the tracks
set by the District on the Golf Course from December 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987 on the following
days and at the following times: Sunday through Thursday from 9 AM to 4 PM. Paragon guides
will have the right to use the Starter House Friday and Saturday from:9 AM to 4 PM.
The Town shall use the Starter House for the following purposes:
a. The rental of cross-country skis and related equipment
b. The service of packaged food and beverages
c. As a warming house for cross-country skiers
d. Daily cross-country lessons nd various outings
2. The monies raised by the Town through rentals, programs and food sales will fall short
of the cost of operating the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation and therefore the
Town will pay $10.00 rent to the District for the use of the Starter House for the purpose set
forth herein.
3. Prior to using the Starter House as a cross-country ski operation, the Town will remove
the carpet in the dining area of the Starter House and store same for the winter and re-install
it prior to the time the Starter House is used by the Recreation District for the golf season.
4. Ski racks will be placed around the building and signs will be posted indicating that
skiers should not lean their skis or poles against the Starter House. In addition, cross-country
skiers will be prohibited from bringing their skis inside the House and the Town will post signs
indicating same.
5. The Town will open the rest rooms in the facility only when an employee of the Town or
Paragon Guides is present to supervise the use of the facility. The Town will be responsible
for the cleaning, repair and maintenance of the facilitiy during the time set forth herein that
the Town has possession of the premises.
6. The Town and Paragon Guides will produce and distribute a cross-country brochure to all
those renting cross-country ski equipment at the Starter House. The Town shall pay fifty percent
(50p) of the cost of reproduction. The brochure will contain information informing the public
of the proper use of the golf course by cross-country skiers so as to minimize any damage to
the golf course.
7. The Town will pay for seventy (70:) of the utility, water and sanitation costs for the
term of this agreement and Paragon Guides will-pay thirty,percent (30%).
8. Any firewood utilized by the Town in the course of its cross-country ski operation shall
be stored two feet from the building on the west side so as to prevent the structure from being
nicked and scraped by wood.
9. Any damage to the Starter House caused by the negligence of the Town of Vail during its
use of the facility as a cross-country ski operation will be repaired by the Town of Vail at
the Town's cost prior to April 15, 1986. However, it is understood that should ary such damage
be covered by the District's fire or casualty insurance, then the Town shall not be liable for
such damage.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their hand and seal the date first above
written.
TOWN OF VAIL, A Colorado municipal corporation
Rondall V. Phillips
VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT,
a Colorado quasi-governmental body
Robert W. Ruder
1986 VAIL REC. SUBSIDIES
Oper. Revenues Less Eypen_,es
User- Fee Tw
Rev Exp Subsidy
Gol f Course 78B,331 7B1,000 ( 7, -331 )
Clubhouse Debt 0 300,000 300,000
Tennis 3e,310 77 , 742 39,432
Golf Course Lease 0 70,000 70,000
Subtotal VMRD 826,641 1,22S,742 402,101
Golf Course Debt 0 272,000
Arena Opdr. 300,779 470,000 169,221
Arena Debt it -005,56S 205
Recreation Programs 2A5,787 5395126 293,339
Misc. Park: Debt it e50,OOO 850,000
World Cup, Champ., Coors 0 125,450 125,450
Subtotal TOV 546,566 2,462,144 1,915,078
TOTAL VAIL 1,771,2077 3,690,886 2,317,679
1 r
TOV Golf Course Debt
Arena Operations ; "
' VMRD Golf Course Lease
Tennis
Arena Debt
A.
.
Clubhouse Debt
Recreation Programs,,''
77
11 - - ----5'-117•;_; I World Cup
_ - _ _ ; '139 Championship
.
Coors
-j -'j j - Misc. Park Debt