Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-31 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION RETREAT TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 1987 12:00 noon at 1067 PTARMIGAN ROAD AGENDA Discussion of Homestake II Position Statement 5,424, t TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT THE CHEESE SHSF' OF" V€=k I 1_ CROSSROADS SHOPPING CENTER 476-14f3 SANDWICH MENU SANDWICHES INCLUDE CHOICE OF: DREAD-LIGHT OR DARK* RYE,WHOLE WHEAT,SOURD000H,FRENCH ROLL,PITA,OR ONION DUN CHEESE-CHEDDAR,PROVOLONE,OR SWISS CONDIMENTS-LETTUCE,TOMATO,MAYONNAISE,AND REGULAR OR SPICY MUSTARD WHOLE-HALF 1 SPECIALS BAI-.':ED HAM-----$3.35-1.99 1 NAM OHASSIS ROAST BEEF---- 3.35-1.99 1 HAM,SWISS,ONION,TOMATO & ITALIAN DRESSING CORNED BEEF--- 35-1.99 1 ON A FRENCH ROLL $3.45 PASTRAMI------ 3.35-1.99 1 SALAMI-------- 3.35-1.99 1 SICILIAN SUB TURX'EY-------- 3.35-1.99 1 SALAMI,HAM,PROVOLONE,SWISS,ONION,TOMATO & LIVERWURST---- .35-1.99 1 ITALIAN DRESSING ON A FRENCH ROLL $3.65 CHEESE-------- 3.35-1.99 1 CHICKEN SALAD- 3.35-1.99 ( REUBEN TUNA SALAD---- 3.35-1.99 I CORNED BEEF,SWISS,SAUERKRAUT,SPICY MUSTARD EGG SALAD----- 1.35-1.99 I ON DAR[-.'.' RYE $3.45 I ON CROISSANT- I ITALIAN SAUSASE MEAT & CHEESE-- 2.50 I SPICY SAUSAGE,PROVOLONE,ONION & SPAGHETTI CREAM CHEESE & ( SAUCE ON A FRENCH ROLL $3.65 OLIVE .5 l ( EAST COAST SUB BAGELS- ( HAM,CAPICOLLA,PROVOLONE,LETTUCE,TOMATO, CREAM CHEESE--- 1.225 I ONIONS,OREGANO,OIL & VINEGAR ON A FRENCH SALMON,CREAM CHEESE, 1 ROLL $3.75 TOMATO.ONION, 1 & CAPERS------- 4.25 I SOOD EARTH ( SOUR CREAM,AVOCADO,CHEDDAR CHEESE,TOMATO, CHEF SALAD------- 3.15 I ALFALFA SPROUTS,000UMBER ON WHOLE WHEAT 1 WHOLE-$3.315 HALF-$1.99 EXTRAS ALFALFA SPROUTS- .5 1 VES6IE DELITE SPECIAL CHEESE-- .45 1 CREAM CHEESE,TOMATO,BLACK OLIVES,AVOCADO, AVOCADO--------- .85 1 ALFALFA SPROUTS & CUCUMBER ON WHOLE WHEAL" MEAT------------ -95 I WHOLE-$3.35 HALF-$1.99 WALNUTS--------- .45 ONIONS---------- .15 1 ALL SANDWICHS MAY HE HEATED IN OUR MICROWAVE COME IN AND CHOOSE FROM OUR DELICIOUS SALAD SELECTIONS 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1.1111111111111111111111111111 March 5,1987 The Aspen Times Page 17 A , 'k * aria ram rou - 00 3 C0 't's `gym C~ J •'.-t _Y ice. i! A' A- 1 by Duane Noriyuki system. ,'The packets will be ` If nothing. else, preliminary _ mailed to manufacturers who cost-sharing projections for a $25 f have expressed interest. " t = . million aerial tramway link be- Aerial Tramway Funding ' While.Utah is conducting a tween Snowmass Village and, • Preliminary similar study, there really is no Aspen will give people something,. _ . system operating anywhere in the to argue about. country exhibiting the technology, The steering committee doing . o Existing Gov't:6.3%; $250,000, . that might be required locally. the preliminary work on the pro- User Fees 43.8 /o $1,750,000 The group is near the Point •l 1 its first look at some f here it will hire technical ea- l - gures last week. The first draft gineers to help determine needs shows 43.8% ($1.75 million) of the Federal 1.3% $50,000 and responses,, from: manufac- total annual debt service/oper turers. ational costs to be picked up .by,' According to Young, the pie users. -State 3.8% $150,000 chart figures are further proof According to Snowmass Village' that an aerial link is not a pie-in- Town Manager John Young, that Commercial Interests 2.5/o Y Project. It is something is a conservative figure based on a" - $100,000. that is realistically within the $5 round-trip fare between Aspen ; grasp of the community. and Snowmass, $2.50 between o `Schools 1..3% $50,000 The current time frame calls for Aspen or Snowmass and Butter-":. Aspen .Skiing Company 2.5% a system to be installed by. the milk. $1,000,000 ' 1990/91 ski season if all goes well.,. The figures add up to $4 mil- Property Tax- Increase (3 mills). The study remains in the infancy lion, although it is preliminarily 16.3°l0 $650,000 stage, but it is generating a great anticipated that $3.25 million.per deal of interest in the community year would get the job done.. and among. manufacturers; The Aspen Skiing Co would Annual Contributions $4,000,000 Young said. contribute $1 million a year, the._-, The group also will be taking its Note: $3,250,000/Year Required-, $1 million up front eliminates $92,272/Year-. r second biggest chunk of the pie:; show on the" road. to approach chart. One of the political con- groups such as the Aspen Resort cerns to be addressed could be committee already has discussed would pitch in $50,000, and the figures, "is an attempt to get ,e: Association, Aspen Lodging Asso whether the Skiing Co will be is the possibility of allowing land- figures also show $50,000 from something on the table, some-'_ ' ciation and explain their plans willing to pay $1 million a year . owners to use the system for free,' the feds, $150,000 from the state.' thing to talk and argue about.- . and progress. and also have its customers if a property tax increase is, Funding from the federal and These figures will change, but An aerial tram is viewed as a charged for riding the system. approved by voters. state governments is a crap shoot, now we have a starting point. The potential means of reducing air The third biggest chunk would Local governments would pitch according to Young. They might figures, I think, were well- pollution by providing an attrac- come from a 3-mill county-wide in $250,000 a year, while com come up with more, they may con received in that no one got up and' tive and fast form of mass transit . property tax increase generating mercial interests would pay , tribute nothing. started. screaming and left the between Aspen and Snowmass $650,000. One thing the steering . $100,000. The school,, distf ic_ t- y "All this is," said. Young of the, room." and points in between. It also is The steering committee is com- viewed as a year=round tourist prised of representatives from the attraction; a marketing tool. city of Aspen; Snowmass Village, Pitkin.County; Roaring Fork. The•governmental/private Transit Agency and the Aspen business partnership has yet to Skiing Co. Aspen Highlands has face many hurdles, but Young opted to not participate. said the group is optimistic in that The group is in the process of the findings thus-far have sup compiling a package of infornia-' ported the positive nature of such tion outlining requirements of a a system." ' - "r., I"1ARV 1 hl s _ S I riOm 1E3~~ Y1 ink t" C3F%J I X LANE v~ a z , C® 8165 c -7 E-"-f 1 E-2 E3 p LIAR ~ March 25, 1987 Mr. Ron Phillips, Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado ©1657 Mr. Phillips: The enclosed protest is provided to indicate opposition to inclusion in said district of the property at 1995 Chamonix Lane, also know as Tract 2, Haus Bergfristall, a resubdivision of Buffer Creek, Lot 27, Eagle County Colorado. This protest is asserted for reasons including the following: The east end of Chamonix Lane does not require the major reconstruction contemplated. Minor patching, as has been done each Spring, would suffice. The west end of Chamonix. Lane is badly eroded and may require more than the simple annual patching. The omission of Circle Drive indicates recognition that this end of West Vail has not suffered the damage encountered at the west end of West Vail. Further, residents of Circle Drive shall benefit equally with other east end West Vail from any such improvements. However, all these owners would agree that any additional benefit is minimal. The primary purpose for paving Charmonix Lane is due to the use of this route for the Town of Vail busses. This is recognized by the Town providing For an additional contribution from the general Fund, but the benefit of such reconstruction is primarily For the bus service and not for the residents along the bus route. Damage to streets is greatly increased when used by heavy vehicles, like busses. The cost of such street construction is greatly increased to provide for such heavy loads, and lighter construction would suffice if traffic were restricted to light weight (automobile) vehicles. Town of Vail Page-?- Chamonix Lane is used as an alternative route . For vehicles wishing to avoid the traffic on North Frontage Road from the West Vail If-way stop to east of the Safeway. This problem shall increase when the vacant land east is fully developed with commercial shops and offices. Repaving Chamonix Lane would encourage such alternative use further endangering children, other pedestrians, and egress from rssidents' driveways.- Despite the existing restrictive speed limits, many vehicles travel this road at extremely unsafe speeds. Cnlg the bumps in the road (mainly from road cuts) seem to slow them down. Frankly, I Like the condition of the road as it is, requiring traffic to obey the speed limits to avoid damage to their vehicle. The cost of preparation and paving, is less than half oi= the total cost of the improvements, but the property owners are required to fund expenses for wh.i.ch they receive no additional benefit. .Assessing property by size is certainly innovative but not necessarily appropriate. If the benefits received is determinative in assessments, then it may be more appropriate to have an equal charge For each dwelling unit. Actually thou..., the benefit, if any, of such work is to tile entire town and not only Ito the property owners. Finally, forming a local improvement district and requiring owners within such district to. pay additional taxes flies in the Face of equality. The cost of street paving heretofore has been borne From the town's general Funds to which all taxpayers contribute and all persons benefit, whether visitors, tenants, or owners. Moving this burden to property owners indicates that their benefit is greater than others using these streets. This additional cost was not disclosed or discussed when this area was re-annexed, though it had obviously been discussed by the Vail Town Council. Perhaps the re-annexation might not have occurred so smoothly if we had known of your plan. Since no map describing the streets to be reconstructed was provided with the materials received, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of the owners list. i' Town of Vail Page-3- k Hopefully these protests and inequities shall be resolved amicably though it may require greater contribution from the town For this work. The dramatic decrease in real estate values in recent years and increasing inability to liquidate, witnessed by a record setting number of foreclosures, hardly provides an appropriate climate For increasing the tax burden on already overburdened property owners. I am currently required to support the Vail Golf Course without any such recognition to use the facility, and would be required to pay for major reconstruction of these streets without any additional benefit if included in this district. Sincerely yours, y L, f cc: Vail IAn Council J i