HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-21 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 1987
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Public Hearing on Heritage Cablevision regarding Past Performance and Future
Needs
2. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1987, second reading, an ordinance annexing a
portion of an area generally known as the Valley; and setting forth details in
regard thereto.
3. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1987, second reading, an ordinance creating Town of
Vail, Colorado, West Vail Local Improvement District No. 1; approving the plans
for and authorizing the construction and installation of special and local
improvements therein in connection with which special assessments shall
hereafter be levied to pay a portion of the costs thereto; approving the method
of apportioning such assessments; making findings and conclusions based upon
evidence presented at a public hearing concerning the foregoing; and setting
forth details in relation thereto.
4. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1987, first reading, an ordinance establishing the
Town of Vail health insurance agency account.
5. Resolution No. 18, Series of 1987, a resolution requesting the Highway
Department of the State of Colorado conduct an investigation into the
desirability of conducting a study to determine whether or not the speed limit
for large trucks traveling west bound on Vail Pass should be reduced.
6. Appeal of Planning and Environmental Commission Decision to Deny a Side Setback
Variance for Parcel A, a Resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17, Block 7, Vail Village
First Filing
7. Appeal of a Design Review Board Decision to Approve a Second Unit and Garages
on Lot 34, Vail Meadows Filing No. 1
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
8. Town Manager's Report
9. Adjournment
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 1987
7:30 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 1. Public Hearing on Heritage Cablevision regarding Past
Larry Eskwith Performance and Future Needs
Action Requested of Council: Hold a public meeting to
obtain information concerning Heritage Cablevision's past
performance under its franchise agreement and to identify
future cable related community needs.
Background Rationale: The Federal Cable Communications Act
sets forth a formal procedure for renewal of a franchise
which must be followed if the Cable company so requests.
Heritage Cablevision has requested that we follow this
formal procedure and the first step is the holding of a
public hearing to identify future community cable related
needs and to assess Heritage's past performance.
7:50 2. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1987, second reading, concerning
Larry Eskwith a public hearing and ordinance annexing the Valley
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 9,
Series of 1987, on second reading.
Background Rationale: This ordinance will annex the area
known as the Valley into the Town of Vail.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of
1987, on second reading.
8:00 3. Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1987, second reading, a public
Stan Berryman hearing and ordinance establishing the West Vail Local
Larry Eskwith Improvement District No. 1
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 10,
Series of 1987, on second reading.
Background Rationale: This ordinance creates the local
improvement district to reconstruct 2-112 miles of streets
in the Vail das Schone, Vail Ridge, Buffehr Creek and Vail
Heights areas.
Staff Recommendation: Receive public input and approve
Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1987, on second reading.
8:15 4. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1987, first reading,
Charlie Wick establishing a Town of Vail Health Insurance Trust Fund
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 11,
Series of 1987, on first reading.
Background Rationale: The Town of Vail's health plan has an
escrow fund account set up at the First Bank of Vail via
escrow agreement requirements with the insurer. In order to
have the monies in the escrow account recorded as Town
assets we need to establish an agency fund which serves the
purpose of a clearing account.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of
1987, on first reading.
8:25 5. Resolution No. 18, Series of 1987, requesting the Highway
Dick Duran Department to Study Speed Limit on Vail Pass
Larry Eskwith
Action Requested of Council: Consider the resolution to the
State Highway Dept. requesting a study, which would
determine if a reduced speed limit for heavy truckloads west
bound on Vail Pass would prevent runaway truck accidents.
Background Rationale: After the 1/16/87 truck accident, the
Fire Department has research their incident reports and
determined that brake system failures in heavy truckloads
descending Vail Pass is a problem. We have made contact
with State Highway personnel, who advised the Town request a
study. We have found that no runaway trucks were reported
when road conditions required traffic to move at a reduced
speed.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 18, Series of
1987.
8:35 6. Appeal of Planning and Environmental Commission Decision to
Rick Pylman Deny a Side Setback Variance for Parcel A, a Resubdivision
of Lots 14 and 17, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing
Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn the PEC
action.
Background Rationale: Michael Tennenbaum requested a front
and side setback variance in order to construct a
primary/secondary structure on Forest Road. The PEC
approved the front setback request and denied the side.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommendation to PEC was to
approve the front setback request and to deny the side
setback request. Staff recommendation to Council is to
uphold the PEC decision.
8:45 7. Appeal of a Design Review Board Decision to Approve a Second
Betsy Rosolack Unit and Garages on Lot 34, Vail Meadows Filing No. 1
Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn the DRB
decision.
Background Rationale: On March 17, 1987, the Council
overturned the DRB's decision concerning a proposed second
residence and garages to be added to an existing residence
located on a duplex lot, Lot 34, Vail Meadows Filing #1.
The motion to overturn was made by Hermann Staufer and
seconded by John Slevin who cited Section 18.54.050 D3 which
states in part, "Particular attention shall be given the
landscape design of off-street parking lots to reduce
adverse impacts upon living areas within the proposed
development, upon adjacent properties, The vote was
5-2 in favor of the motion with Gordon Pierce and Paul
Johnston voting against overturning the DRB decision.
On April 1, 1987, a second proposal was presented to the DRB
who approved it by a vote of 5-0. This approval is being
appealed by an adjacent neighbor, Mike Reid.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
8. Town Manager's Report
9. Adjournment
-2-
ORDINANCE NO. 9
-Series of 1987
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A PORTION OF AN AREA GENERALLY
KNOWN AS THE VALLEY; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN
REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, on the basis of competent evidence presented in a public hearing on
the petition for annexation of the territory more particularly described in Exhibit
A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, the Town Council made
certain findings of fact and concluded that:
A. The requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-
105, C.R.S., as amended, have been met, and
B. No election for the annexation of said territory is required under
Section 31-12-107(2), and
C. That no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed upon said
territory; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council now wishes to annex said territory by ordinance in
accordance with Section 31-12-111, C.R.S., as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, as follows:
Section 1.
The territory set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference is hereby annexed to the Town of Vail, Colorado without special terms or
conditions.
Section 2.
A. A copy of the annexation map with the original of this annexation
ordinance shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail.
B. The Town Clerk shall file for recording two (2) certified copies of this
annexation ordinance and map of the area annexed containing a legal description of
such area with the County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado.
C. The County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County shall be directed to file
one (1) certified copy of the annexation ordinance and map with the Division of
Local Government of the Department of Local Affairs.
Section 3.
Within ninety (90) days after the effective date hereof, the Town of Vail,
Colorado shall impose zoning on the annexed area in accordance with Chapter 18.68
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, Colorado.
s
Section 4.
This annexation shall take effect in accordance with the Charter of the Town
of Vail and the statutes of the State of Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS 7th day of Arixa ,
1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 7th day of
Arju e , 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this 7th day of Aoxit 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this day of 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
r
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A11 of Lots 20 and 21, Section 1, and part of the N 1/2 Section 12, all in Township
5 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Eagle County. Colorado,
described as a whole as follows:
Beginning at an existing brass cap monument marking the N 1/4 Corner of said Sec-
tion 12; thence N00°01'02"W 61.32 feet, along the westerly line of Lot 1, The
Ridge at Vail according to the map thereof recorded at Reception No. 202800, to the
boundary of Lion's;Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 4 according to the map thereof
recorded ac/Reception No. 202794; thence the following two courses along the west-
erly and northerly lines of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 4: (1) NOO°Ol'
02"W 1307.66 feet; (2) N87°51'42"E 1378.39 feet, to the northeasterly corner of
said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 4; thence the following six courses along
the existing Town of Vail boundary: (1) SOO°04'39"W 1379.52 feet along the easterly
line of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 4; (2) S88°17'49"W 300.00 feet
along the southerly line of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 4, to the
northeasterly corner of Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 2 according to the map
thereof recorded at Reception No. 121219; (3) SOO°03'25"W 495.18 feet along the
easterly line of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 2; (4) departing said
easterly line and continuing SO0°03'25"W 88.62 feet, to the southerly right-of-war
line of Lion's Ridge Loop; (5) 488.67 feet along said right-of-way on the arc of a
1771.95 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 15°48'04", and
having a chord that bears S51°38'04"W 487.12 feet; (6) S59°32'06"W 1243.30 feet
along said right-of-way line to the easterly line of Lion's Ridge Subdivision
Filing No. 3 according to the map thereof recorded at Reception No. 187193; thence
continuing along the existing Town of Vail boundary and along the easterly line of
said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 3 N37°09'31"W 60.41 feet, to the norther-
ly right-of-way line of said Lion's Ridge Loop; thence continuing along the existing
Town of Vail boundary and said northerly right-of-way line N59°32'06"E 880.33
feet, to the most easterly corner of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 3;
thence the following nine courses along the existing Town of Vail boundary and the
easterly and northerly lines of said Lion's Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 3: (1)
N39°54'08"W 330.95 feet; (2) S69°46'30"W 49.27 feet; (3) 255.16 feet along the arc
of a 135.00 foot radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 108°17'40",
and having a chord that bears N56°04'40% 218.84 feet; (4) S84°55'16"W 621.05 feet;
(5) S50°05'00"W 330.00 feet; (6) S68°15'00"W 990.00 feet; (7) S74°45'00"W 430.00
feet; (8) S66°15'00"W 532.96 feet; (9) 13.36 feet along the arc of a 130.00 foot
radius curve to the right, having a central angle of 05°53'11", and having a chord
that bears S30°03'49"W 13.35 feet, to the westerly line of said Lion's Ridge Sub-
division Filing No. 2 also being the westerly line of said Section 12; thence N01°
35'59"E 1524.16 feet along said westerly lines, to the northwesterly corner of said
Section 12; thence N88°19'41"E 2475.92 feet along the northerly line of said Lion's
Ridge Subdivision Filing No. 2 also being the northerly line of said Section 12, to
the northwesterly corner of said Lot 1, The Ridge at Vail; thence continuing along
the northerly line of said Section 12 and the northerly line of said Lot 1, S88°19'
41"E 280.00 feet, to the point of beginning.
D19564 RECD APR -
1 ~Q$?
03/30/87
CERTIFIED RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
OF THE
TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL. EAGLE COUNTY. COLORADO
RELATING TO AN ORDINANCE CREATING
TOWN OF VAIL. COLORADO.
WEST VAIL LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1,
AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF.
SPECIAL AND LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN,
AND
APPROVING THE METHOD OF APPORTIONING ASSESSMENTS.
TO PAY A PORTION OF THE COST THEREOF
,s
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ss.
TOWN OF VAIL )
The Town Council of the Town of Vail, Eagle County,
Colorado, met in regular session, in full conformity with the
Town Charter, ordinances and all other applicable laws, rules and
regulations, at the Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado, the
regular meeting place thereof, on Tuesday, the alst day of April,
1987, at the hour of 7:30 p.m.
The following members of the Town Council were present:
Mayor: Paul R. Johnston
Mayor Pro-Tem: Kent Rose
Council Members: Eric Affeldt
Gordon Pierce
John Slevin
Hermann Staufer
Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal
The following members of the Town Council were absent:
The following persons were also present:
Town Manager: Rondall Phillips
Town Finance Director: Charles Wick
Town Attorney: Lawrence A. Eskwith
Town Clerk: Pamela A. Brandmeyer
Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were
had and taken:
Council Member introduced and
moved the approval on first reading of the following Ordinance,
which was then read by title, sufficient copies of the full
ordinance having previously been made available to the Town
Council and to the public:
D19564 1 03/30/87
ORDINANCE NO. 10
SERIES OF 1987
AN ORDINANCE CREATING TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, WEST VAIL
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1; APPROVING THE PLANS
FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION
OF SPECIAL AND LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN IN CONNECTION
WITH WHICH SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SHALL HEREAFTER BE
LEVIED TO PAY A PORTION OF THE COST THEREOF; APPROVING
THE METHOD OF APPORTIONING SUCH ASSESSMENTS; MAKING
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON EVIDENCE PRESENTED
AT A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE FOREGOING; AND
SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter of the Town of Vail,
Eagle County, Colorado, Title 20 of the Vail Code and Resolution
No. 1, Series of 1987, the Town Council held a public hearing on
April 7, 1987, relating to the creation of a local improvement
district for the construction and installation of certain special
and local improvements to the Vail Das Schone, Vail Ridge,
Buffehr Creek and Vail Heights areas; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has considered the testimony
and other evidence presented at said hearing and all comments
made by affected property owners and members of the general
public relating thereto.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1. Based upon all the evidence, the Town
Council finds as follows:
1.1 Pursuant to Resolution No. 1, Series of 1987,
the Town Council has duly initiated by appropriate order the
special and local improvement project described herein.
1.2 The Town Manager or his delegee has duly held
meetings relating to the improvements for the purpose of
informing affected property owners about the same and about the
assessments proposed and for the purpose of obtaining their
reactions thereto.
1.3 Notice of a public hearing thereon in the
required legal form was duly published in The Vail Trail on
March 27, 1987.
1.4 A copy of the same notice was duly mailed by
first-class mail, postage prepaid, on Marches And- 1987, to
D19564 2 03/30/87
all affected property owners at the last known address of each
such owner as shown on the real property assessment rolls for
general (ad valorem) taxes of Eagle County, Colorado, as of
March fq, 1987. In addition, steps were taken by Town officials
to ascertain the current owners of affected properties and their
addresses, and attempts were made to furnish them with actual
notice via mail. Included with the notice was a form entitled
"Protest," that the owner(s) could use to protest against the
proposed project.
1.5 All necessary legal requirements and
conditions precedent for initiation of the improvements and for
the public hearing on the same held on April 7, 1987, have been
fully performed, met and satisfied.
1.6 A public hearing on the project was duly held
on April 7, 1987, and full opportunity was afforded all affected
property owners to present their views at said hearing.
1.7 There have been valid protests filed in
accordance with the Charter and Title 20 of the Vail Code,
numbering l . The Town Council finds that the number of protests
so filed are less than fifty percent (50%) of the affected
property owners constituting the basis of assessment of the
district. The Town Council duly considered each and every
protest, objection and remonstrance and determined the same to be
without merit. It hereby declares and rules the same overruled
and finally passed on by the Town Council and that the project
should proceed notwithstanding the same as it is necessary for
the preservation of the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest.
1.8 Schematic design plans have been duly
presented to the Town Council for the proposed improvements,
which generally include constructing and installing certain
improvements to streets in the West Vail area including, but not
limited to, preparation and paving, drainage, lighting and
safety, and improvements to the sanitary sewer system in the West
Vail area, including, but not limited to, a new sewer main. Said
schematic design plans are hereby deemed satisfactory.
1.9 The improvements to be constructed and
installed are special and local improvements that also confer
general benefits upon the Town. It is therefore appropriate that
the general public share in a portion of the cost of the
improvements. The total estimated cost of the improvements is
$1,020,000. The portion of the cost of the improvements to be
borne by the Town is $495,000. The portion of the cost of the
improvements to be defrayed by the levying of special assessments
against affected properties specially benefited shall not exceed
$525,000. Said cost estimate and apportionment are satisfactory
and reasonable in every respect.
D19564 3 03/30/87
1.10 Properties proposed to be assessed abut or
are in the vicinity of such improvements and will benefit from
the construction and installation thereof. Assessments are to be
levied because the improvements will confer substantial special
benefits on all of the affected properties within the boundaries
of the district, which special benefits are separate and distinct
from the general benefits to the Town that will also result
therefrom.
1.11 The proposed assessments have been determined
by using a method of assessment and a formula that apportions the
cost of the improvements on a fair and equitable basis and
reflects a reasonable apportionment consistent with the benefits
to be conferred. The proposed apportionment of the cost and the
method of assessment ensure every property owner equal protection
and due process of law.
Section 2. Based upon the above findings and the
additional findings stated below, the Town Council finds,
concludes and orders as follows:
2.1 It has jurisdiction over the West Vail areas
where the improvements are to be made and over all of the
affected properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
2.2 The Town Council, in addition to the express
determinations hereinabove set forth, by the adoption of this
Ordinance, overrules all other objections and remonstrances that
may have been made, either in writing or orally at the public
hearing.
2.3 There is hereby created within the corporate
limits of the Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, a local
improvement district to be known and designated as "Town of Vail,
Colorado, West Vail Local Improvement District No. 1" ( the
"District") for the purpose of constructing and installing
certain improvements to streets and to the sanitary sewer system
in the West Vail area and of assessing a portion of the cost
thereof to the properties benefited thereby, which properties are
described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
2.4 The extent of the District to be assessed for
the cost of the improvements and the area to be included within
the boundaries of the District shall be all the real property
described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
2.5 The schematic designs for the improvements
are hereby approved, subject to modifications that could be
imposed due to cost constraints. The construction and
installation of the improvements within the District as
shown by said preliminary plans are hereby authorized and
ordered.
D19564 4 03/30/87
2.6 The Town shall pay $495,000 of the cost of
constructing and installing the improvements. In addition, the
Town shall pay any part of the project cost that exceeds the
estimated cost of constructing and installing the improvements.
2.7 The Town Council has determined, and does
hereby determine, that assessments shall be levied against the
affected properties in the District (the properties specially
benefited by the improvements therein) according to the method
described in Exhibit B attached hereto.
2.8 After considering all of the circumstances
and weighing the factors specified in Title 20 of the Vail Code,
the Town Council has determined, and does hereby determine, that
as a result of the improvements to be constructed and installed
within the District each such property will receive a special
benefit, including without limitation increased market value, in
an amount which equals or exceeds the maximum amount of the
particular assessment to be assessed against each such property;
that said method of assessment is a fair and equitable method;
and that the assessments made will be in proportion to the
special benefits conferred upon such properties and sufficient to
cover the portion of the total cost of the improvements to be
defrayed by the levying of special assessments. Accordingly,
said method of assessment is hereby approved.
2.9 The proposed assessment schedule shown on
Exhibit A attached hereto is hereby approved. The assessments to
be levied against the affected properties shall not exceed the
assessment amounts provided in said schedule.
2.10 The total cost of the project (excepting the
amount to be paid from sources other than special assessments)
shall be apportioned upon the substantial completion of the
improvements in an assessment roll against each property to be
assessed as herein described. After notice thereof and a hearing
thereupon, assessments shall be levied by ordinance of the Town
Council. The method of assessment provided for herein shall be
used and followed at the time such assessments are so levied.
Said assessments shall be a lien until paid in the several
amounts assessed against each such property from the effective
date of the assessing ordinance.
2.11 All assessments shall be due and payable
without demand within thirty (30) days after the adoption and
final publication of the assessing ordinance. Property owners
shall be permitted, at their election, upon the levy of
assessments to pay such assessments on an installment basis in
not more than ten (10) substantially equal annual installments
beginning August 1988 at an interest rate not to exceed eight and
one-half percent (8.5%) per annum but not less than the highest
D19564 5 03/30/87
interest rate on any special assessment bonds issued to pay the
cost of the improvements. Interest shall be computed on the
outstanding principal and shall be paid with the principal. Said
installment schedule and maximum interest rate are hereby
approved.
2.12 Pursuant to the laws of the State of
Colorado, the Charter, and Title 20 of the Vail Code, special
assessment bonds (the "Bonds") of the Town shall hereafter be
issued for the purpose of paying for the improvements described
in this Ordinance, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
the cost and expenses of providing said improvements, including
engineering, legal and incidental costs, and interest as provided
by law. The Bonds shall be issued based upon estimates approved
by the Town Council and as authorized by an Ordinance to be
passed by the Town Council at a later date. The maximum net
effective interest rate on such special assessment bonds is eight
and one-half percent (8.5%) per annum. The principal of and
interest on the Bonds shall be payable out of the special
assessments authorized herein to be levied against the real
property included within the District and specially benefited by
the improvements to be constructed and installed.
2.13 Pursuant to Title 20 of the Vail Code, owners
of properties abutting the street improvements must connect their
premises with the utilities in the street in front of their
premises, such utilities including, but not being limited to,
phone, cable television, gas, water and sewer. Upon default of
any owner for twenty days after the effective date of this
ordinance to make the connections, the Town Manager may contract
for and make the connections at the distance, under the
regulations, and in accordance with the specifications as may be
prescribed. In this event, the whole cost of each connection
shall be separately assessed against the property with which the
connection is made, and the cost shall be paid upon completion of
the work, and in one sum. The cost shall be assessed, shall
become a lien and shall be continued in the same manner as is
provided in Title 20 for the assessment and collection of the
cost of other special improvements. Upon default in the payment
of any such assessment, the property shall be sold in like manner
and with like effect.
Section 3. The officers of the Town are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into such agreements and take
all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions
of this Ordinance and to comply with the requirements of law.
Section 4. All actions not inconsistent with the
provisions of this Ordinance heretofore taken by the Town and by
the officers thereof and directed toward the creation of the
District, the construction and installation of the improvements
D19564 6 03/30/87
therein, and the levy of assessments to pay a portion of the cost
thereof are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.
Section 5. All ordinances or resolutions, or parts
thereof, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
This repealer shall not be construed to revive any ordinance or
part of any ordinance heretofore repealed.
Section 6. If any section, paragraph, clause or
provision of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be
invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of
such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any
of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 7. The limitation period of thirty (30)
days within which suits or actions regarding this Ordinance must
be brought, as set forth in Title 20 of the Vail Code, will
commence to run on April 21, 1987.
Section 8. A public hearing on this Ordinance shall
be held by the Town Council at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 21,
1987, at the Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado, and it is
hereby ordered that notice of said hearing be given by
publication once in The Vail Trail on April 10, 1987.
Section 9. The Town Council finds that this
Ordinance is necessary to and for the benefit of the public
interest and the public health, safety, and welfare.
INTRODUCED, READ BY TITLE, PASSED ON SECOND READING
APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL this21st day of
April, 1987.
Mayor
(TOWN) Town of Vail
(SEAL) Eagle County, Colorado
ATTEST:
Town Clerk
Town of Vail
Eagle County, Colorado
D19564 7 03/30/87
Council Member duly seconded the
motion, and the question being upon the passage and approval on
first reading of the foregoing Ordinance, the roll was called
with the following result:
Council Members voting "Yes": Paul R. Johnston
Kent Rose
Eric Affeldt
Gordon Pierce
John Slevin
Hermann Staufer
Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal
Council Members voting "No":
Council Members present having voted in favor
of said motion, the Mayor thereupon declared the Ordinance duly
passed and approved on first reading and directed that the
Ordinance, as approved, be published once in full in The Vail
Trail, a newspaper of general circulation within the Town and
legally qualified for Town publications.
After consideration of other business to come before
the Council, the meeting was adjourned.
Town Clerk
Town of Vail
Eagle County, Colorado
(TOWN)
(SEAL)
D19564 8 03/30/87
Exhibit A
(Attach description of properties to be assessed
and schedule of assessments.)
D19564 9 03/30/87
VEST VAIL SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
TOTAL CONDO TOTAL
NAME SUB. BLK. LOT CONDOMINIUM (S.F.) MULTIPLIER COST
CORE RANGE CONDOMINIUMS It 1 22148.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
CHRISTOPHER V.H. 1• 1-£ CORE RANGE 11 3691.33 0.000908 1431.13
CANNON V.H. 1 1-W CORE RANCE II 3691.33 0.000908 1431.13
PJ&J VAIL V.H. 1 2-E CORE RANCE II 3691.33 0.000906 1431.13
MILLER V.H. 1 2-W CORE RANCE 11 3691.33 0.000908 1431.13
SHERAR V.H. 1 3-E CORE RANCE II 3691.33 0.000908 1431.13
BROWN V.H. I 3-W CORE RANCE II 3691.33 0.000908 1431.13
PINE RIDGE TOWNHOUSE ASSN. V.H. 1 2 22128.00 0.005441 12,884.46
PINE RIDGE TOWNHOUSE ASSN. V.H. 1 3 22651.00 0.005570 12,645.54
PINE RIDGE TOWNHOUSE ASSN. V.H. 1 4 23087.00 0.005677 12,696.46
SCHMETZKO V.H. 1 A 5241.00 O.OOt289 1612.13
OBERLOHR V.H. 1 9 23322.00 0.003784 12,747.27
OBERLOHR V.H. t 10 23087.00 0.005677 12,696.46
OBERLOHR V.H. 1 11 22631.00 0.003570 12,645.34
RICKMAN V.H. 1 12 23087.00 0.005677 12,696.46
KNIGHT V.N. 1 13 23522.00 0.003784 12,747.27
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOS II V.H. 1 14 23522.00
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOS I V.H. 1 15 23087.00
VAIL HEIGHTS CONDOS V.N. 1 16 23087.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
MECAPOLITAN MORTGAGE V.H. 1 1-A VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
TALBOT V.H. 1 1-8 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
DAVIS V.H. 1 1-C VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
OSTERfOSS V.H. 1 2-A VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
LINDEN V.H. 1 2-B VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
LAYNE V.H. 1 2-C VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
BURKET V.H. 1 3-A VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
R.M. CHRISTIAN ASSN. V.H. 1 3-B VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
ELIOPULOS V.H. 1 3-C VAIL HEIGHTS 2t12.00 0.000319 4246.67
MEINEKE V.H. 1 I VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
TASHIRO V.H. 1 2 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
WETTLAUFER V.H. 1 3 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
KORCHOWSKY V.K. 1 4 VAIL HEIG14TS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
WOOD V.H. 1 S VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
BRANDL V.H. 1 6 VAIL HEIGHTS 2tt2.00 0.000519 .1246.67
BANDO V.H. 1 7 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000819 1246.67
BORSTAD V.H. 1 8 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
MCDONALD V.H. 1 9 VAIL HEICHTS 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
COSTELLO Y.H. 1 10 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
O'BRIEN V.H. 1 11 VAIL HEIGHTS 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
EMRICK
6 V.H. 1 12 vik tr. urrr.uTa
PHASE III
MILLS V.H. 1 1 VAIL HEIGHTS 111 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
NELSONIHEALS V.H. 1 2 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
ENGEL V.H. 1 3 VAIL HEIGHTS 111 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
O'REILLY V.H. 1 4 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
MILLS V.H. 1 5 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2tt2.00 0.000319 1246.67
HOYT V.H. 1 6 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
MINNE-VAIL VII V.H. 1 7 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
MAUPIN V.H. 1 8 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
SNYDER V.H. 1 9 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
GILLETT V.N. 1 10 VAIL HEIGHTS 111 2112.00 0.000519 6246.67
HARDY V.H. 1 11 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000319 1246.67
LINDSAY V.H. 1 12 VAIL HEIGHTS III 2112.00 0.000519 1246.67
CROOKED SKI TOWNHOUSE V.H. 1 17 23700.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
SHERWOOD V.H. 1 1 CROOKED SKI TOWNHOUSES 6423.00 0.001580 1730.41
BASS V.H. 1 2 CROOKED SKI TOWNHOUSES 6423.00 0.001580 1750.41 r
GARDNER, SMITH, WEIRICH V.H. 1 3 CROOKED SKI TOWNHOUSES 6425.00 0.001580 6750.41
MORRIS V.H. 1 4 CROOKED SKI TOWNHOUSES 6423.00 0.001580 1750.41
CARNIE V.R.** A 1 37200.00 0.009147 14,344.80
TEZLA V.R. A 2 29875.00 0.007346 13,489.27
SCHAUER V.R. A 3 29450.00 0.007241 13,439.63
CLARKSON V.R. A 4 27028.00 0.006646 63,156.76
EKLUNDIMUELLER V.R. A S A, FEOLA-EKLUND 13290.00 0.003266 11,352.22
FEOLA Y.R. A 3 B, FEOLA-EKLUND 13290.00 0.003266 11.552.22
WENZEL. KONTERSKI V.R. A 6 27368.00 0.006729 13,196.47
KAWESKE, PALMER V.R. A 7 24775.00 0.006092 12,893.61
BRINKMAN Y.R. A 8 PART OF 11033.00 0.002713 11,288.61
BENA V.R. A 8 PART OF 13734.00 0.003377 11.604.07
STADLER V.R. A 9 25730.00 0.006332 13,007.49
SCHUETZ V.R. B 1 11348.00 0.002790 !1.325.40
CRAWFORD V.R. B 2 PARCEL It CRAWFORD 7353.00 0.001808 1838.80
MARTINEZ Y.R. B 2 PARCEL 2, CRAWFORD 5987.00 0.001472 6699.26
PERKINS. JR. V.R. B 3 12072.00 0.002968 61,409.96
GORDON V.R. B 4 11230.00 0.002766 11,313.93
TALBOT V.R. B 3 11752.00 0.002890 11,372.58
MODES V.R. B 6 12762.00 0.003138 11,490.55
HARTMAN V.R. B 7 13902.00 0.003418 11,623.69 `
ANDERSON V.R. B 8 13761.00 0.003384 11,607.23
ANDERSON V.R. B 9 14902.00 0.003664 11,740.49
ANDERSON V.R. B 10 15205.00 0.003739 11.775.88
SCHEIDEGGER V.R. B 111 16445.00 0.nn4n4A t+ o,pn 11
SCHEIDEGGER V. R. B 12 15230.00 0.003743 11.776.80
SCHEIDEGGER Y.A. B 13 20135.00 0.004951 $2,331.68
MANTERNACH V.R. B t4 PARC. A, VR TOWN 14190.00 0.003489 11,657.33
BODEN V.R. B 14 PARC. B, VR TOWN 13985.00 0.003439 $1.633.39
SCHILLING V.R. B 15 20030.00 0.004930 12,341.75
TURNOVSKY V.R. B 16 18675.00 0.004592 $2.181.16
TURNOVSKY Y.R. B 17 15376.00 0.003781 $1.796.06
HILLER V.R. B 18 15757.00 0.003674 $1,840.35
OBERLOHR/PODHOLA V.R. B 19 14650.00 0.003602 111711.06
JUSTICE V,R. B 20 14708.00 0.003616 11,717.63
KISS V.R. B 21 13452.00 0.003708 $1,571.14
STAUFER V.R. B 22 12500.00 0.003074 11,459.95
STORK V.R. B 23 12228.00 0.003007 $1.426.18
HERZOG, ESTATE OF V.R. B 24 11419.00 0.002808 $1,333.69
ANDERSON/SWARTWOUT V.R. C 1 12372.00 0.003091 $1,468.36
BUETOW V.R. C 2 12043.00 0.002961 $1,406.57
OBERLOHR V.R. C 3 12284.00 0.003020 11.434.72
OBERLOHR V.R. C 4 11735.00 0.002865 11,370.60
RAUB V.R. C 5 15203.00 0.003738 11,775.65
PHILLIPS V.R. C 6 15475.00 0.003803 $1,607.41
BOYD V.R. C 7 16200.00 0.003963 11,892.09
CONNER, CORBIN V.R. C 6 18200.00 0.004473 $2,125.68
KENDALL/SLINKMAN V.A. C 9 12923.00 0.003178 11,509.38
CHASE V.R. C 10 12038 .00 0.002980 11,905.99
CHASE V.R. C 11 A VR DUPLEX 6207.00 0.001526 $724.95
CHASE V.R. C 11 B VR DUPLEX 6072.00 0.001493 $709.18
14081.00 0.003462 $1,644.60
WARREN V.R. D 1
MOBLEY/KRENTLER V.R. D 2 14667.00 0.003606 11,713.04
HYLAND V.R. D 3 13925.00 0.003424 11.626.38
VAUGHAN V.R. D 4 PARCEL 4B, VAIL RID 6643.00 0.001633 $775.87
BASKINS/MADIGAN V.R. D 4 PARCEL 4A, VAIL DUP 6643.00 0.001633 $775.87
MAGRINI V.R. D 5 23350.00 0.005741 $2,727.18 '
CRADDOCK VDS 1*** A 1 6125.00 0.001998 1948.97
CRADDOCK VDS 1 A 2 $300.00 0.002041 1969.40
CRADDOCK VDS 1 A 3 7943.00 0.001954 $927.94 [
E.i
BRANDYWINE TRACE CONDOS VDS 1 A 4 8217.00 $
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
MINN£-VAIL NINE VDS 1 1 BRANDYWINE TRACE 2054.25 0.000505 $239.93
JORDAN VDS 1 2 BRANDYWINE TRACE 2054.25 0.000505 1239.93
CHIPPERS INVESTMENT VDS 1 3 BRANDYWINE TRACE 2034.23 0.000305 $239.13
DITTO/GUHEEN VDS 1 4 BRANDYWINE TRACE 2054.23 0.000505 $239.93
TENTERACE CONDO VOS 1 A S 8950.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
SCHMITT VDS 1 1 TENTERRACE 2237.50 0.000550 6261.33
HERBST VDS 1 2 TENTERRACE 2237.50 0.000550 $261.33
RYAN VDS 1 3 TENTERRACE 2237.50 0.000550 $261.33
JORDAN VDS 1 4 TENTERRACE 2237.50 0.000550 $261.33
SUNLIGHT CONDO VDS i A 6 8175.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
RANCHIPALMER VDS 1 1 SUNLIGHT 2043.75 0.000503 $238.70
ALPERT VDS 1 2 SUNLIGHT 2043.75 0.000503 $238.70
BRAUCH VDS 1 3 SUNLIGHT 2043.75 0.000503 $238.70
LUNDGREN VDS 1 4 SUNLIGHT 2043.75 0.000503 $238.70
KAPLAN VDS 1 A 7 8052.00 0.001980 $940.44
BELEHRADEK VDS 1 A 8 8061.00 0.001982 $941.49
BELEHRADEK VDS t A 9 8597.00 0.002114 61,004.09
YATES VDS 1 A 10 9575.00 0.002354 $1,118.32
WIEST VDS 1 A 11 9118.00 0.002242 61,064.94
STAUPER VDS 1 A 12 8581.00 0.002110 $1,002.22
OZERSKY VDS 1 A 13 8865.00 0.002180 $1,033.39
OZAWA VDS 1 A 14 9727.00 0.002392 61,136.07
MEDINA VDS 1 A 13 10675.00 0.002625 61,246.79
SABA VDS 1 A 16 9873.00 0.002426 $1,153.36
GARZA VDS 1 A 17 9402.00 0.002312 61,098.11
VERGARA VDS 1 A 18 9718.00 0.002390 51,135.02
MARTINEZ-VARA VOS 1 A 19 8400.00 0.002065 $981.08
VAIL VIEW TOWNHOUSES VDS 1 A 20 9700.00
VAIL VIEW TOWNHOUSES VDS 1 A 21 8457.00
VAIL VIEW TOWNHOUSES VDS 1 A 22 9195.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
CANTER VDS 1 1 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 6354.96
KUDEL VDS 1 2 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 6354.96
ELMORE GROUP VDS 1 3 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 6354.9d
STOTT VDS 1 4 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 $334.96
SMITH VDS 1 S VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 $354.96
HELWIG VDS 1 6 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 $354.96
KIRK VDS 1 7 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 $354.96
ARNOLD VDS 1 8 VAIL VIEW 3039.11 0.000747 5354.96
SHERROD VDS 1 9 VAIL VIEW
• 3039.11 0.000747 $359.96 t
NORTHRIDGE VDS I A 23 10325.00
NORTHRIDGE VDS 1 A 24 10116.00
NORTHRIDGE VDS 1 A 23 10250.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUMS
VUKONICH VDS 1 A 1 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.56 0.000635 1301.63
BALLWEG VDS 1 A 2 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.58 0.000633 1301.63
MINNE-VAIL VI VDS 1 A 3 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2382.58 0.000633 1301.63
BUCKLEY VDS 1 A 4 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2382.56 0.000633 1301.63
KUBE VDS 1 B 3 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.38 0.000635 1301.63
LANDAUER VDS 1 B 6 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.58 0.000633 1301.63
DONNELLY VDS 1 B 7 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2562.38 0.000633 1301.63
SHEM VDS 1 B 8 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.58 0.000633 1301.63
KUBE VDS 1 C 11 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2382.58 0.000633 1301.63
LANDAUER VDS 1 C 12 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2582.58 0.000633 1301.63
LINNEROOTH VDS 1 C 13 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2382.58 0.000633 1301.63
LANSLETT VDS 1 C 14 NORTHRIDGE CONDOS 2382.58 0.000633 1301.63
GEGERSON VDS 1 A 26 10323.00 0.002339 11,203.92
ANDERSON VDS 1 A 27 10726.00 0.002637 11.252.75 r
SINGLETON VDS 1 A 28 11773.00 0.002893 11,373.27
1408199 0.346256 1164,471.64
ti
L
NAME SUB. BLK. LOT CONDO. (S.F.) (S.F.) MULTIPLIER COST
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS t B 1 12225.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
RUSSELL VDS 1 K 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3056.25 0.000751 $356.96
GRAVES VDS 1 K 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3036.25 0.000751 $356.96
KUSUNO VDS 1 K 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3056.25 0.000751 $356.96
MOSKOWITZ VDS 1 K 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3056.25 0.000751 $356.96
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 B 2 10057.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
GOSNAY VDS 1 H t CHAMONIX CHALETS 2514.25 0.000618 $293.65
KEHL VDS 1 H 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2514.25 0.000618 $293.65
CORNIEA• BROOKS. LENZM£IER VDS I H 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2514.25 0.000618 $293.43
ROZMAN VDS 1 H 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2514.25 0.000618 $293.65
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS I B 3 10634.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
VAIL ENTERPRISES VDS 1 C 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2658.50 0.000654 $310.50
LENTZ VDS 1 G 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2658.50 0.000654 $310.50
BEASLEY VDS 1 G 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2658.30 0.000634 $310.50
WILKENS VDS t G 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2658.50 0.000654 $310.50
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 B 4 11000.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
GOLDEN VDS I C 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2750.00 0.000676 $321.19
BECKLEY VDS 1 C 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2750.00 0.000676 $321.19
RILEY VDS 1 C 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2750.00 0.000676 $321.19
FISHKIN-JOHNSON VDS 1 C 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2750.00 0.000676 $321.19
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 B 5 10622.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
CLAGETT VDS 1 B 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2655.50 0.000653 $310.15
JOHNSON VDS 1 B 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2655.50 0.000653 $310.15
FARQUHAR VDS 1 B 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2655.50 0.000653 $310.13
HIMMES VDS 1 B 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 2655.50 0.000653 $310.15
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 B 6 12740.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM L
ERB VDS 1 A 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3185.00 0.000783 $371.99
DAVIS VDS 1 A 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3185.00 0.000783 $371.99
MCCADAM VDS 1 A 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3185.00 0.000763 $371.99
ARMSTRONG. HENAULT VDS 1 A 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 3185.00 0.000783 $371.99 Z
SCH£IDECCER YDS 1 8 7 -
SCHEIDEGGER VDS 1 B 8 1 - RESUB LOTS 8-10 16051.00 0.003947 111874.69
SCHEIDEGGER VDS 1 B 9
SCHEIDEGGER VDS 1 B 10 2 - RESUB LOTS 8-10 20188.00 0.004964 12,337.87
SCHEIDEGGER VDS 1 B 11 11775.00 0,002895 11,375.27
SCHMIDT VDS 1 B 12 11338.00 0.002831 $1.347.59
DOUGLAS VDS 1 C 1 13275.00 0.003264 11 .550.46
PALMER VDS 1 C 2 12430.00 0.003061 11.434.11
WENZEL VDS 1 C 3 11277.00 0.002773 11.317.11
KRUEGER VDS 1 C 4 11339.00 0.002788 11.324.35
STARK, VANSCOY VDS 1 C 5 12438.00 0.003038 11.452,71
MULROONEY VDS 1 C 6 13554.00 0.003333 11.583.05
CUCCIA VDS 1 C 7 13251.00 0.003258 11.547.66
RAPSON VDS 1 C 6 14025.00 0.003449 11,638.06
STEVENS VDS 1 C 9 13631.00 0.003352 11,592.04
KOENIG VDS 1 C 10 13840.00 0.003403 11.616.45
BECKLEY VDS I C 11 31361.00 0.002843 11.350.28
CAROSELLI VDS 1 C 12 12250.00 0,003012 11,430.75
GOLDEN VDS 1 C 13 13250.00 0.003256 11.547.54
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 14 13485.00
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 15 13344.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
BITETTO/ADAMS VDS 1 D 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6707.25 0.001649 1783.38
COTTER VDS 1 D 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6707.25 0.001649 1783.38
CL£ARY VDS 1 D 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6707.25 0.001649 1783,38
KEIR VDS 1 D 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6707.25 0.001649 1783.38
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 16 17925.00
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 17 14813.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
LIVINGSTON VDS 1 E 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 8184.50 0.002012 1955.91
BENVEHUTO VDS 1 E 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 8184.50 0.002012 1953.91
LEVEBVRE/NILSON VDS 1 E 3 CHAMONIX.CHALETS 8164.50 0.002012 /953.91
HOLSTEN VDS 1 E 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 8184.50 0.002012 1955.91
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 18 12969.00
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS i C if 12059.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
BARNES VDS t r 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6257.00 0.001839 1730.79
BRADY/FERRIGAN VD3 1 F 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6257.00 0.001539 1730.79
SCHMIDT VDS 1 F 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6257.00 O.OOt539 1730.79
ADAMSIDANIEL VD3 t F 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 6257.00 0.001539 1730.79
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS i C 20 11561.00
CHAMONIX CHALET.- VDS 1 C 21 11738.00
4:
FINLAY VDS 1 I 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 5824.75 0.001432 (680.31
TAYLOR/ROFFE VDS 1 I 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 5824.73 0.001432 $680.31
STEM VDS 1 I 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 5824.75 0.001432 $680.31
BENNETF VDS 1 I 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 5824.75 0.001432 $680.31
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 22 12500.00
CHAMONIX CHALET VDS 1 C 23 27225.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUMS
UGLIANITZA VDS 1 J 1 CHAMONIX CHALETS 9931.25 0.002442 $1,159.93
SCHENCK VDS 1 J 2 CHAMONIX CHALETS 9931.25 0.002442 $1.159.93
DELTA DRYWALL VDS 1 J 3 CHAMONIX CHALETS 9931.25 0.002442 (1.159.93
HARBOUR VDS 1 J 4 CHAMONIX CHALETS 9931.25 0.002442 $1,159.93
BROWN. B. VDS 1 D 1 31375.00 0.007715 $3,664.47
DEMPEWOLF VDS 1 D 2 12450.00 0.003061 61.454.11
WILT VDS 1 D 3 10750.00 0.002643 $1,255.55 r
BROWN, M. VDS 1 D 4 10728.00 0.002638 $1,252.98
TOWN OF VAIL VDS 1 D S 14550.00 0.003578 61,699.38
CROWDER VDS 1 E 1 12959.00 0.003186 t1.513.56
BERNSTEIN VDS 1 E 2 12031.00 0.002958 $1,405.17
EDMISTON VDS 1 E 3 UNIT 3, HEtHI'S 5209.00 0.001281 $608.39
SCHMIDT VDS 1 E 3 UNIT 4. HEINt'S 5688.00 0.001399 $664.33
NICHOLLS VDS I E 4 PART OF 4127.00 0.001015 $482.02
BRENNEN, MINSHALL, ET. AL. VDS 1 E 4 PART OF 7036.00 0.001628 1868.49
RICCI VDS 1 E 5 11030.00 0.002717 $1.290.59
LORIMER VDS I E 6 11175.00 0.002748 $1.305.19
CROWDER VDS 1 E 7 UNIT 1. HEINI'S 5366.00 0.001319 $626.73
SCHORVITZ VDS 1 E 7 UNIT 2. HEINI'S 5223.00 0.001284 $610.02
MT. HOLY CROSS LUTH. VDS 1 E 8 11110.00 0.002732 11.297.60
SWEARENCEN VDS 1 E 9 12379.00 0.003044 $1.445.81
HALL VDS 1 E 10 13550.00 0.003332 1t.582.58
PRANGE. MADSON, KRUEGER VDS 1 E 11 UNIT 1, KRUEGER 7280.00 0.001790 1850.27
TURNBULL VD3 1 E 11 UNIT 2, KRUEGER 7290.00 0.001793 $831.44
ELLEFSON VDS 1 E 12 PARCEL 1, AROSA 6521.00 0.00t603 $761.63
STURGES VDS 1 E 12 PARCEL 2, AROSA 6521.00 0.001603 $761.63
LILISCHKIES VDS 1 F 1 11441.00 0.002613 11,336.26
WEIDMANN VDS 1 F 2 UNIT I. CORTINA LANE 5707.00 0.001403 $666.55
WEIDMANN VDS 1 F 2 UNIT 2, CORTINA LANE 5707.00 0.001403 (666.55
RAPSON VDS 1 F 3 10904.00 0.002681 $1,273.54
S-M PETROLEUM VDB 1 TRACT A 23958.00 0.005891 $2,798.19
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES VDS 1 TRACT B 31363.00 0.007712 13,663.06
CRADDOCK VDS 1 TRACT C 104544.00 0.025706 $12,210.29
1-70 TRACT O ASSOC. VDS 1 TRACT D 272250.00 0.066942 $31,797.64
$ 1143344 nA n e~..w~ ~
r-
TOTAL AREA TOTAL
NAME SUB. BLK. LOT CONDOMINIUM (S.F.) MULTIPLIER COST
BISHOP i HODGE VDS 2 C 1 10454.00 0.002570 11,220.98
CLEMENTS VDS 2 G 2 10434.00 0.002570 111220.98
DODSON VDS 2 G 3 SCANDIA LODGE f1 5009.30 0.001232 1385.09
POSTIRODEN VDS 2 G 3 SCANDIA LODGE 82 5009.30 0.001232 1385.09
VAIL SKY HIGH VDS 2 G 4 10454.00
VAIL SKY HIGH VDS 2 G S 10433.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
BRITTON VDS 2 1 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
ROSENER VDS 2 2 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 1203.31
KRESGEIWILFRED VDS 2 3 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
GREENIYAECKEL VOS 2 4 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 1203.51
CLARK VDS 2 S VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 1203.31
1ST BANK OF VAIL VDS 2 6 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 1203.31
WILSON VOS 2 7 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
EBERLE VDS 2 8 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
BREWER VDS 2 9 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
RABAK AND HOFFMAN VDS 2 30 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 1203.51
SESSLER VDS 2 11 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
NEWBOLD VDS 2 12 VAIL SKY HIGH 1742.42 0.000428 $203.31
ALPEN CHALET VDS 2 G 6 13070.00 r 17;
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUMS
DYER VDS 2 1 ALPEN CHALETS 3267.50 0.000803 $381.63 ,
SCHALLER VDS 2 2 ALPEN CHALETS 3267.50 0.000803 $381.63
SOLEM VDS 2 3 ALPEN CHALETS 3267.50 0.000803 $381.63
HELTEN VDS 2 4 ALPEN CHALETS 3267.50 0.000803 $381.63
ALPEN CHALETS, INC. VDS 2 G 7 PART OF 12630.00 0.003106 $1,473.13
DANGLER VDS 2 G 7 98, EAST PARCEL 4159.00 0.001023 $483.73
RIDER VDS 2 G 7 68. WEST PARCEL 6877.00 0.001691 $803.20
CHENAULT, HANSON VDS 2 G 8 PART OF 8712.00 0.002142 $1.017.52
CHENAULT, HANSON VDS 2 G 9 13939.00 0.003427 $1,628.02
ALPEN CHALET TOWNHOUSES VDS 2 G 30 15246.00 ,
ALPEN CHALET TOWNHOUSES VDS 2 G li PART Of 2141.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
HALLER 1 ALPEN CHALETS 4346.75 0.001069 1507.68
HALLER 2 ALPEN CHALETS 4346.75 0.001069 1507.68
WEDEL 3 ALPEN CHALETS 4346.75 0.001069 1307.68 ,
BROTEN 4 ALPEN CHALETS 4346.73 0.001069 1307.68
FAESSLER VDS 2 G 11 PART Of 13540.00 0.003329 11.581.41
1
rAESSLER VDS 2 Ol t2 13246.00 0.003749 $10780.67
LAMPE VDS 2 O 13 17860.00 0.004392 12,085.97
LAMPE VDS 2 C 14 21780.00 0.005355 $2.343.81
GARMISCH TOWNHOUSES VDS 2 G 15 26012.00
SHIMONKEVITZ VDS 2 G A GARMISCH 6633.00 0.001631 $774.71
• CORDOVA VDS 2 G B CARMISCH 3908.00 0.000961 $456.44
HORN VDS 2 G C CARMISCH 3649.00 0.000897 $426.19
BOONE VDS 2 G D CARMISCH 3326.00 0.000818 $388.46
ENRIGHT VDS 2 G E CARMISCH 6496.00 0.002089 $992.30
KEYSER VDS 2 H 1 11326.00 0.002785 $1,322.83
GLAHE VDS 2 H 2 19602.00 0.004820 $2.269.43
KEYSER VDS 2 H 3 10454.00 0.002370 $1,220.98
GLAHE VDS 2 H 4 10454.00 O.OD2370 $1,220.98
SUNLIGHT NORTH VDS 2 H 5 10454.00
SUNLIGHT NORTH VDS 2 H 6 10435.00
UNIT CONDOMINIUM
DYER VDS 1 1 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
PAXSON VDS 1 2 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 1271.34
THOMAS VDS 1 3 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
SCHLEPER VDS 1 4 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 5271.34
GUADAGNOLI VDS 1 5 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
BLOOMER VDS 1 6 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
LAWRENCEIROSE VDS 1 7 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
ANDERSON VDS 1 8 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000371 1271.34
CORPORATE VAIL, INC. VDS 1 9 SUNLIGHT NORTH 2323.22 0.000571 $271.34
W&W ASSOCIATES, LTD. VDS 2 H 7 10890.00 0:002678 $1,271.91
W&W ASSOCIATES. LTD. VDS 2 H 8 11326.00 0.002785 11,322.83
W&W ASSOCIATES, LTD. VDS 2 H 9 22216.00 0.005463 12,594.73
KING VDS 2 H 10 29621.00 0.007283 $3,459.61
BARNHART, MILLER VDS 2 H 11 10454.00 0.002570 11,220.98
BARNHART. MILLER VDS 2 H 12 12632.00 0.003106 $1,475.36
BARNHART, MILLER VDS 2 H 13 19166.00 0.004713 12,238.51
MILLER VDS 2 H 14 20909.00 0.005141 $2.442.08
BARNHARDT VDS 2 H 15 22216.00 0.005463 12,594.73
SZARAPKA VDS 2 H 16 20473.00 0.005034 $2.391.16
WEST VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. VDS 2 H 17 17860.00 0.004392 $2,085.97
WEST VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. VDS 2 H IB 19602.00 0.004820 $2,289.43
DEMARTIN VDS 2 H 19 19602.00 0.004820 $2,289.43
GLATZLE VDS 2 H 20 20473.00 0.005034 $2,391.16
CRADDOCK VDS 3 1 91040.00 ) 0.022385 $10.633.08
VAIL MALL JOINT VENTURE VDS 3 2 A 116495.00 ) 0.014322 $6,803.06
TOWN OP VAIL 0.014322 $6,803.06
VAIL CITY CORP. VDS 3 3 142006.00 0.017459 $8,292.85
TOWN OF VAIL 0.017459 $8.292.85
1
VAIL COMMONS, LTD. VDS 3 UNPLATTED 267452.00 0.070680 $33,573.17
VAIL DAB SCHONE CONDOMINIUMS UNPLATTED 123275.00
BLDG. UNIT CONDOMINIUM
VEST VAIL ASSOCIATES VDS 3 A 1 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000303 1239.97
SPEARS. ROGERS VDS 3 A 2 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $231.17
W&W ASSOCIATES. LTD. VDS 3 A 3 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $231.97
MALONEY VDS 3 A 4 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000305 1239.97
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES, LTD. VDS 3 A 5 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $231.97
FOUR-S PROPERTIES VDS 3 A 6 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
SKI FORE VDS 3 A 7 VAIL DAB SCHON£ 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
SHOWALTER VDS 3 A 8 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
VESTERSTEIN VDS 3 A, 9 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 1239.97
TUPY VDS 3 A !0 VAIL OAS SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 6239.97
DOWNHILL ASSOCIATES, INC. VDS 3 A 11 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
HOLTON VDS 3 A 12 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
HERITAGE HOUSE APTS. VDS 3 A 13 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000503 $239.97
FRANCHISE OPERATIONS, INC. VDS 3 A 14 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES, LTD. VDS 3 A 15 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
GORE VALLEY ENTERPRISES VDS 3 A 16 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
W&W ASSOCIATES. LTD. VDS 3 A 17 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
FRANCHISE OPERATIONS, INC. VDS 3 A 18 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
BARKE VDS 3 A 19 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $231.97
BURNS VDS 3 A 20 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000503 $239.f7
CONCKLIN VDS 3 A 21 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4101.17 0.000305 1239.97
PARSONS VDS 3 A 22 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000305 $239.97
TRAWOGGER VDS 3 A 23 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000305 $239.97 f
STELLO. WADE VDS 3 A 24 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000503 6239.97
GORE VALLEY ENTERPRISES VDS 3 A 23 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 1239.97
GRAUE MILL PROPERTIES VDS 3 .A 26 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4101.17 0.000505 $239.97
GREGG VDS 3 A 27 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
FARNSWORTH VDS 3 A 28 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $231.97
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES, LTD. VDS 3 C 1 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0:000505 $239.97
WEST VAIL ASSOCIATES. LTD. VDS 3 C 2 VAIL DAB SCHONE 4109.17 0.000505 $239.97
TOWN OF VAIL 123275.00 0.013156 17,1f9.00
SIMON Be**** 27 UNIT A. HAUS BERG. 8692.00 0.002137 $10015.19
BOURGEOIS Be 27 UNIT B, HAUS BERG. 9718.00 0.002390 61,135.02
JACOBI Be 28 25400.00 0.006245 $2.966.61
BARTON Be 29 PARCEL A. MILLER 12119.00 0.002980 $1,415.43
HOE Be 29 PARCEL B. MILLER 11024.00 0.002711 $1.287.56
PETERSON Be 30 13640.00 0.003846 110826.69
ALLEN Be 32 17804.00 0.004378 12,079.43 l
JUDISH, EWAN, ANDERSON Be 33 17605.00 0.004329 52,036.11
KASPARAITIS Be 34 15355.00 0.003825 11.816.76
KASPARAITIS Be 33 15533.00 0.003823 $1,816.76 l
DONAHUE Be 36 UNIT 36E 7701.00 0.001894 $899.44
KASPARAITIS Be 36 UNIT 36W 7847.00 0.001929 $916.50
RABER, ET. AL. Be 37 16446.00 0.004044 $1.920.82 l
SAM DAVIS COMPANY, INC. Be 38 18579.00 0.004566 $2.169.95
0.372071 6176.733.70 i
r
TOTALS - SID ASSESSMENTS 1513186 0.372071 1176,733.70
0.346256 1164,471.64
0.261673 1133.714.66
WEST VAIL SID - SEWER LINE ASSESSMENTS
KING VDS ! 10 13,355.55 1.000000 1473,000.00
BARNHART/MILLER VDS 2 11 13,555.55
BARNHARTIMILLER VDS 2 12 13,535.55
BARNHARTIMILLER VDS 2 13 15,555.55
MILLER VDS 2 14 15,555.55
BARNHART VDS 2 15 15,555.55
W. VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. VDS 2 17 15,535.53
W. VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. VDS 2 18 15.555.55
DEMARTIN VDS 2 11 15,535.55
150.000.00
GRAND TOTAL - WEST VAIL SID 1525,000.00
* VAIL HEIGHTS
VAIL RIDGE
***VAIL DAS SCHONE
****BUPPEHR CREEK
"J46
L
Exhibit B
(Attach description of method of apportioning assessments.)
The cost of the street improvements to be assessed
against the benefited properties shall be apportioned among such
properties based upon a formula which considers lot size and type
of property use. Under this formula each property shall be
assessed a percentage of the total cost to be assessed, derived
by dividing the area of such property in square feet by the sum
of the areas in square feet of all properties to be assessed.
For this purpose each improved property used for commercial
purposes having no direct access to the streets being improved
shall be treated as having an area equal to one-half of its
actual area in square feet. The cost of the sanitary sewer
improvements to be assessed against the benefited properties
shall be apportioned equally among such properties.
D19564 10 03/30/87
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ss.
TOWN OF VAIL )
I, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, the duly elected or appointed,
qualified and acting Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Eagle
County, Colorado, do hereby certify that the foregoing pages 1 to
10, inclusive, constitute a true and correct copy of the Record
of the Proceedings of the Town Council of the Town, taken at its
regular meeting held at the Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado,
on Tuesday, the day of April, 1987, commencing at the hour of
7:30 p.m., as recorded in the official Record of the Proceedings
of the Town kept in my office, insofar as said proceedings relate
to an Ordinance creating Town of Vail, Colorado, West Vail Local
Improvement District No. 1, authorizing the construction and
installation of special and local improvements therein, and
approving the method of apportioning assessments to pay a portion
of the cost thereof; that said proceedings were duly had and
taken; that the meeting was duly held; and that the persons were
present at said meeting as therein shown.
It is hereby further certified that the Ordinance, as
approved on reading, was published in full in The Vail
Trail, a newspaper published and having general circulation in
the Town and legally qualified for Town publications, and an
affidavit of publication with respect thereto is attached hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has hereunto set her
hand and the seal of the Town this day of April, 1987.
Town Clerk
Town of Vail
Eagle County, Colorado
D19564 11 03/30/87
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) ss.
TOWN OF VAIL )
(Attach affidavit of publication in full of Ordinance
and notice of public hearing thereon.)
D19564 12 03/30/87
ORDINANCE NO. 11
Series of 1987
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE TOWN OF VAIL HEALTH
INSURANCE AGENCY ACCOUNT.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail entered into an Escrow Agreement in June of 1984 with
the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company; and
WHEREAS, the Escrow Agreement provides for the establishment and maintenance of
an escrow fund which has been so established; and
WHEREAS, the funds in the escrow fund are not currently accounted as Town
assets; and
WHEREAS, an agency fund needs to be established-per the Town Auditor's direction
to serve as the clearing account for these monies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO:
1. The Town of Vail hereby establishes an account to be called the Town of
Vail Health Insurance Agency Fund effective to the inception date of the Escrow
Agreement.
2. All escrow monies requored to be maintained by the Town in accordance with
its Escrow Agreement with Lincoln National Insurance Company dated June of 1984
shall be placed in said account.
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS day of ,
1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of
, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this day of 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this day of 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
WEST BOUND I -70 SURVEY - BRAKE FAILURES
They following are dates and problems recorded by the Vail Fire
Department from January 1, 1985 through April 15,, 1987 due to brake
problems with semi-tractor trucks traveling west on Vail Pass.
There have been many smoking brake reports •t.hrat we have not. found,
probably dues to the truck continuing to travel west through Vail.
1--6-85 'T'ruck in upper truck ramp lost braking system
4--.4-•85 Truck overturned - ran up e:nbeankment.
5-'28•--85 Truck in lower truck ramp - lost braking system
6-•29.-85 Truck with breakers on fire - half mile east of lower truck ramp
7-•12--8 Brake fire extinguished by cir°i. veer mile marker 1761&;.,
8•-•13-85 Truck: in lower truck: ramp los:it braking system
8--15-85 Brake fire - East Vail interchange west bound
8--29--85 Truck in lower truck ramp - lost braking system
9--19-85 Brake firer mile marker 177 could not stop until I--•7C>
leveled out
3-31-86 Brake firer - mile marker 177 could not stop until 1-7(.)
leveled out
7-29•--86 Brake •f i re:r. t•real f mile above l owerr° truck ramp
9-19-86 Truck: in lower truck: ramp - lost braking system
11-6--•86 Truck in lower truck ramp - lost braking system
11-8°•-86 Brake fire miler marker 170
1-16-87 Truck accident hazardous material s p i l l miler marker 1131 ' /
1-23-87 Brake fire m i l e marker 2-8-87 BrctE::c•. fire mile mar° ker° 181
4-11-87 Brake fire mile marker 18C>
,y
RESOLUTION NO. 18
Series of 1987
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF
THE STATE OF COLORADO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO
THE DESIRABILITY OF CONDUCTING A STUDY TO DETERMINE
WHETHER OR NOT THE SPEED LIMIT FOR LARGE TRUCKS
TRAVELING WEST BOUND ON VAIL PASS SHOULD BE REDUCED.
WHEREAS, in January, 1987 there was a hazardous material spill on Vail Pass
which threatened the Town's water supply in Gore Creek; and
WHEREAS, the cause of this accident was a runaway truck; and
WHEREAS, Town of Vail Police Department and Town of Vail Fire Department have
responded to numerous incidents involving smoking brakes and brake fires on trucks
traveling west on Vail Pass; and
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Town Council that a reduction in the speed
limit regulating west bound travel on Vail Pass for large semi-tractor trailer
trucks would significantly reduce the risk of serious accidents on Vail Pass; and
WHEREAS, the first step in setting forth a new and lower speed limit for
semi-tractor trucks on Vail Pass is an appropriate study by the State Highway
Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail,
Colorado, that:
1. The State Highway Department of the State of Colorado should conduct an
appropriate study to determine whether the speed limit on the west bound lane of
Vail Pass should be reduced for semi-tractors.
2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage and shall be
sent forthwith to the State Highway Department.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: April 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Appeal of a Planning Commission denial for a request
of a side setback variance for Mr. Michael Tennebaum
The applicant, Michael Tennabaum requested from the Planning
Commission a 12 foot variance from the required 20 foot front
setback and a 10 foot variance from the required 15 foot side
setback for the newly created Parcel A; a resubdivision of Lots
14 and 17, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing.
Parcel A is a relatively long and narrow lot with a steep grade
coming off of the road. The front setback request entails the
encroachment of garage areas. The side setback request is for
living space on the west end of the property.
The staff recommendation for this request was for approval of
the front setback variance due to the grade considerations and
the precedent for locating parking within setback areas. The
recommendation for the side setback variance was for denial due
to lack of physical hardship and the fact that the applicant
recently created the lot and knew what the zoning restrictions
were.
On March 9, 1987, the Planning and Environmental Commission
voted 5-1 to maintain the staff recommendation.
C TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 9, 1987
SUBJECT: A request for a front and side setback variance for
Parcel A; a resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17, Block 7,
Vail Village First Filing.
Applicant: Michael Tennenbaum
I. DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED
The applicant, Michael Tennenbaum, is requesting a 12 foot
variance from the required 20 foot front setback and a 10
foot variance from the required 15 foot side setback for the
newly created Parcel A; a resubdivision of Lots 14 and 17,
Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Parcel A is a relatively
long and narrow lot sloped from the south to north. Total
lot length is 195 feet and the depth varies from 64 feet to
95 feet. The length of the building envelope (minus
setbacks) is 155 feet, and the depth varies from 29 feet to
60 feet. As a result of the subdivision requested previously
by Mr. Tennebaum, the lot was shortened by approximately 20
to 35 feet on the east end.
C. The front setback entails encroachment of garage areas for
each unit of approximately 12 feet into the required setback.
The slope along this front setback area for the most part
exceeds 30% which allows staff to waive setback requirements
for garages. There is, however, some area on the east end of
the lot that does not exceed 30% and thus technically
requires variance approval.
The requested side setback is for living space on the west
end of the parcel. On the east end of the parcel the
structure is located 30 feet from the property line.
II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.61.060 of
the municipal code, the Community Development Department
recommends approval of the front setback variance and denial
of the requested side setback variance based upon the
following factors:
Consideration of Factors.
The relationship of the requested variance to other existinq_
or potential uses and structures in the vicinity.
r
A. Front Setback Request
In a situation where the average slope underneath the
proposed parking areas exceeds 30%, the staff and Design
Review Board may waive the required front setback
standards. The west unit in this proposal does meet
that criteria, however, the encroachment of the east
unit is in an area of less than 30% slopes and thus
technically requires approval of setback variance. In
this area of the community, building lots of slopes
greater than 30% are fairly common. There are many
examples of garages placed within the front setback,
both through staff waiver of request and through
variance request approvals. We feel there is precedent
for this request and that there is no negative impact on
existing or potential uses in the surrounding area.
B. Side Setback Request
The parcel adjacent to the west end of Parcel A is owned
by the Town of Vail as an open space tract, therefore
the request does not present an immediate impact upon a
building site on the adjacent lot.
The degree to which relief from the strict or literal
interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is
necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the
objectives of this title without grant of special privilege.
A. Front Setback Request
Staff feels that due to the relative steepness of this
slope and the narrowness of the lot as well as the
precedent of approving front setback requests for garage
areas on steep lots in this area, that there would be no
grant of special privilege in the approval of the front
variance request.
B. Side Setback Request
The Community Development staff feels that approval of
this request would be a grant of special privilege. We
believe there is little to no physical hardship on this
parcel which would require a side setback variance. The
length of the allowable building envelope is 155 feet.
The lot was shortened a distance of 20 to 35 feet by the
applicant under a recent application. A building
envelope of 155 feet in width is adequate area in which
to place a primary/secondary structure. Any claim of
hardship due to inadequate length of the lot we believe
is self imposed by the owner as a result of the
resubdivision and a pre-conceived design imposed on the
C site. Furthermore, the design provides for 30 feet from
the eastern property line, giving 15 feet of area wot
work with to avoid a variance situation.
Although there is no building lot to the west of this
proposed variance, we feel that this would be a special
treatment among sites in the vicinity and would
constitute a grant of special privilege.
The effect of the requested variance on light and air,
distribution of population, transportation and traffic
facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public
safety.
A. Front Setback
Assuming that both structures will accommodate two car
garages, then the parking requirements for this site are
being met within their property lines. There is an
indication on the site plan that a retaining wall will
encroach slightly over the property line onto Town of
Vail right-of-way. This will require final approval of
the Public Works Department prior to Design Review Board
approval. Other than that, we see no effect on the
other factors involved in this criteria.
B. Side Setback
The effect of this proposal upon this criteria if the
side setback variance is approved would be the potential
impact of the proximity of the structure to the Town of
Vail parcel should the Town ever desire to construct any
public facilities on this parcel in the future.
III. FINDINGS
The Planning and Environmental Commmission shall lmake the
following findings before granting a variance:
That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant
of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on
other properties classified in the same district.
That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
That the variance is warranted for one or more of the
following reasons:
That the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would result in
practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of this title.
There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the site of the variance that
C do not apply generally to other properties in the same
zone.
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in
the same district.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommendation is for approval of the front setback
variance and denial of the side setback variance request.
We see little negative impact involved in the front setback
request and believe that precedent has been set for this
action. We feel that there is no physical hardship driving
the side setback request and feel that it would be a grant of
special privilege. We believe that this lot provides
adequate space for the siting of a primary/secondary
structure without requiring a side setback variance. We feel
that any hardship is self imposed by the owner through his
previous minor subdivision request and subsequent design.
JLgL i ~ C' ~ A 3~~~~ ' ' N ~ ~ I`
a.
Y
r
. 3'+ t ~ / \•:a~~~~x `~~~'~f 3'"~"*, erg
F d ~ / Fkit ~ffd t~~ e
• P
l
~Ll'.~n AJv~
Site Plan
TO: Ron Phillips
FROM: Community Development
DATE: April 21, 1987
SUBJECT: An appeal of a Design Review Board decision concerning
a proposal to construct a second dwelling and 2
garages on a duplex lot, Lot 34, Vail Meadows #1.
Appealed by Mike Reid
On March 17th the Town Council overturned the Design Review
Board's decision concerning a proposed second residence and two
garages to be added to the existing dwelling located on a duplex
lot, Lot 34, Vail Meadows Filing No. 1. The motion to overturn
the Design Review Board's decision was made by Hermann Staufer
who cited Section 18.54.050 D 3 which states in part,
"Particular attention shall be.given the landscape design of
off-street parking lots to reduce adverse impacts upon living
areas within the proposed development, upon adjacent
properties,...." The motion was seconded by John Slevin and the
vote to overturn the decision was 5-2 with Gordon Pierce and
Paul Johnston voting against overturning the DRB decision.
On April 1, 1987 the architect presented a new proposal to the
Design Review Board which included moving the driveway and one
garage. It was approved 5-0 by the Design Review Board with the
condition that the new residence be lowered four feet and the
chimney be changed from tile to natural cedar.
The DRB's approval on April 1 is being appealed to the Council
by a neighbor to the east, Mike Reid, who was one of the
appellants of the previous appeal.
YF~f_IVLN~( \
~6~ ~ `~~~5 \ CvLVER7 / \ \ 0~
0 "PER
Ta/ R
,Qc~ \
ea ~ • s ~ ~ 0
\ 0
w ua
z /
s lll/ll~~~~~~
1`0 V)
9 1 V ~ti M E76E OF \ of
-cli
ri 612 AC.
y
N 26,658.7 S.F. \ EKTb~D 15f1r+6
Cu LV a me-=61
i 98
LtiRKf u.-C'' 0SL-C. MH.
oj2 I / Exlotli lL
r~XIS-(iw, Dl1PL6X %-9~E A4K
' 1 "I-r (NORTH) 500
o2T1oN of
9p -fo 6E wv
LOT 33
rJ(, AREA n :'•_;t 1966 AMMON
PROPOSEI)
O GARAGE
.0 L,
Z
~ ea.ver r ? fi,
°3- I r PROWEO ~
r k.
2-I,EVEI \
~..J r r Ex
DeG I- ' i NIT
1.
n raov E i I / SoUT44
r ~
r
o _
a
LEGEND
Poor- C,
15.o
-INDICATE
INDICATE
V
LOT 32
'~2EV-l OcJ S
P~apos,~~~
SITE PLAN
I" = 20.0'
Nz~
~<y fit` r «r Y y ~ a i„r -
7k('h•7 ~ a f/••f ..Z ~t t ~ ,;,~~~'pE'-• . s,,,. \ ' -t c _ / _ .
l+~° x~t3r+ :y, ai• aft r R~fbSED ~.a
-4 'A
.14
VF_ PF)L>&gr
Ilk
f/W
jit
Ak, 'j A
b e'l ~ ~ .2 {E 9P- x. ~ ~L ~f 5•' 1 ^ ~-1
z~ x3F ~ y
r
sue. rt~'f^i~~-~ 3 7 N`f ij a~to S~ 1 r ~ ~
.71
'nx
t f GG
~r ~ k~+ ~r '4~L4+ .f• °F'~+ 'rye s t• . .
t
(fir~, • a :~:-,r.~=~e.' -
~
_THE bUtLDi{,rGS DATA
F : r Y" v
rs
o" LE F;;F BOT+•r ITar Pc
NE pg. A.V,
44
WAY S i. • i ; ' : : ~ , eG~Fzr/~,D I h1~,~ I I-aATIO{f s A
` r i a~•+k Via-
om.
March 20, 1987
brlrlerscott Mr. Peter Patten
architects Director Community Development
Town of Vail
143 e. meadow do 75 S. Frontage Road
47Colorado63038 81657
(303) Va i 1, Colorado 81657 Dear Peter:
The attached materials are for a re-application to Design Review Board
for approval of the Gerwig Duplex, Lot 34, Vail Meadow No. 1. As is
evident, the proposal is for two detached units which is contrary to
the Design Guidelines and which, at an earlier meeting, was not approved
by the DRB.
Because the ordinances do allow for the exception, particularly when
"significant site characteristics" warrant it, I'm asking your staff
and the DRB to take a broad view of the existing site conditions.
The site is a triangle and as such puts a limit as to how far away from
the center of the lot one can locate a conventionally proportioned
(rectangular) bull ing footprint.
difficult to "fit" building into
acute angles.
The problem of find ng room is compounded by the required setbacks which
further diminish the area at these angles.
A
i ~
Unfortunately there already is a dwelling unit at the center of the lot,
its main interior spaces located to provide views in three directions.
1 2
r~
Mr. Peter Patten
March 20, 1987
Page Two
The longest view, and the major one from the existing unit is to the
west which by our analysis leaves only the northeast corner or south
acute angle in which to locate an addition. The existing house is
designed with its entrance at the north thus any addition at that
location would interfere with ry area and all related activities:
guest parking, potential for garag a identity from the street.
J
r~
i
t ,
Thus the south location for the ad ition, to us, seems quite reasonable.
The impact on the existing unit is negligible; we believe there will
remain a view to the southwest but views directly south have been
forfeited.
Another significant site characteristic presumably not considered is the
view corridor from neighbors to the east. The nearest neighbors' (over
110 feet) houses are at a higher elevation, perhaps 6 feet to 8 feet;
livingroom areas are on the second floor, at the ends of the structures
configured to direct views pretty much 45° to the long axis of the Gerwig
duplex. The livingroom floors may be 6 feet to 8 feet above the second
floor level of Gerwig's addition. I believe views to the west will not
be lost to these neighbors.
T
`6~N11G;., u t-1'7 ..f. ?s lw'`"°f fm. .
Io5
Never the less, as was apparent from last Tuesday's Council meeting,
another site "characteristic" is the volitil:e nature of the neighbors
and their aggregate feeling against a "wall" as occurs when the two
units are joined. Per our earlier scheme we wish to go back to an
opening between the buildings and acknowledge this strong, vocal site
characteristic. Our opening aligns almost directly with the opening
between the two uphill duplexes thus preserving the "greenway" and
Mr. Peter Patten
March 20, 1987
Page Three
view corridor leading west.
With this submission we've indicated a first choice location for a
single access driveway to the west as well as an alternate, recognizing
that at first glance our preferred scheme may appear inappropriate to
the neighbors at lot 20. We very much believe this is the best solution
for them as well as our client.and look forward to discussing our reasons
with the Design Review Board.
Yours truly,
TW
Thomas A. Briner
BRINER/SCOTT ARCHITECTS
TAB:ka
enclosures
cc: Ron Gerwig
g ~
(JUIVtPER
240
'~e•
JAW.
.^f.
VdAl
100
town of nail
75 south frontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Phillips
FROM: Steve Barwick DATE: April 14, 1987
RE: Consolidation of Recreation Programs
As requested, the following is a brief explanation of the mill
levy "exchange" which would be needed if the VMRD were to take
over certain recreation programs and debt currently paid for by
the Town of Vail.
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL
ITEM VMRD EXPENSE
Golf Course Debt $270,432
Arena Operations Subsidy 164,221
Arena Debt 205,568
Recreation Programs Subsidy 293,339
TOTAL $933,560
The additional $933,560 required by VMRD would translate into a
need for a 7.20 mill levy increase (at current valuations) by VMRD
and a corresponding decrease in the Town's mill levy.
SHB/ds
1986 TOV & VMRD RECREATION EXPENSES
WHICH COULD BE APPLICABLE TO ONE RECREATION ENTITY
Operating Revenues Less Expenses for The Subsidy Level*
User Fee Tax
Revenue Expenses Subsidy_
Golf Course 788,331 781,000 (7,331)
Clubhouse Debt 0 300,000 300,000
Tennis 38,310 77,742 39,432
Golf Course Debt 0 340,432 340,432
Arena Operation 300,779 470,000 169,221
Arena Debt 0 205,568 205,568
Recreation Programs 245,787 539,126 393,339
1,373,207 2,713,868 1,455,323
The figures are unaudited.
April 7, 1987
MINUTES
REGULAR KEETING
PAIL hL'TROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
Karch 12, 1987
?E7SERS PRESENT: George Knox Tim Garton Bob Ruder Gail Molloy
KDIBERS ABSENT: Merv Lapin
Oi ER FIX-BERS PRESENT: Pat Dodson, Steve Satterstrom
CALL TO ORDER: Meetino was called to order at 3:10 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Knox made a motion to approve the minutes of 2/12/87 and 2/19/87, second
by Garton, Passed unanimously.
JIM MORTER: Jim Morter joins the meeting. Morter presented to the board a framed
award which he received from the American Institute of Architects,
Colorado West Chapter. It was Lhe AIA 1986 Honor Award presented to
Morter Architects for their design work on the Vail Golf Club Starter
House. The Board would like a picture of Morter presenting this award
to a Board member with the Starter House in the picture to be sent to
the papers. Morter leaves meeting.
DAVE KANELLI: Dave Kanally from the Vail Resort Association joins the meeting.
SDecial Assessment VtIRD currently owes $421.86 for a VRA Special
Assessment. Kanally gave the board a hand out (see attached) which
explained what the VRA is doing with the-special assessment-funds.
Molloy arrives 3:15 PM
Garton asked why VMRD belongs to VRA. Ruder stated we were not a VRA
member before 1984, but we gave VRA members a $50 discount on their
golf pass and $5 discount on their tennis pass. We then changed the
policy to $50 discount to anyone who purchased their pass by a set date
and VMRD then agreed to become a URA member. Molloy feels we should
pay the special assessment now and discuss belonging to VR.A in November
when membership dues come up. Knox feels VMRD should belong to VP.A
to support Vail. Garton would like Collins to give his opinion on VMRD
being a member of VRA. Molloy mcved to pay the $421.86 special
assessment, second by Knox, passed unanimously.
Management Resource Sweepstakes pool Kanally is asking for 100 games
of tennis and 25 rounds of golf. Garton rfade a motion to give VRA 100
games of tennis and 25 rounds of golf (shuffle people to low golf season),
second by Knox, passed unanimously.
Kanally stated Sports Illustrated is putting a package together which
would be a "one price pays for a Vail vacation". The price would include
air fare, lodging and 2 sports events per day. He will keep the board
informed of this project. Kanally leaves the m=eting at 3:45 PM
CASH FLOW REPORT: Rich Parzonko joins the meeting at 3:50 PM. Rich handed out a memo
and cash break-down report(see attached). Zonk reviewed these figures
with the Beard. Ruder stated the Board could solve their cash shortage
by using the two options in Rich's memo: I) borrow from the Town of
Vail, 7.50, 40 days; 2) Borrow from Ist Bank, 1 point fee, 2Z added
to the 8% flat fee interest charge or 3) an option of unknown source.
Garton stated he will go to 1st bank to talk to Roger about lines of
credit for VMRD for future shortages. Garton moved to go with the TOV
at 7.5% for 90 days and the Board will continue to look for better
financing, second by Knox, passed unanimously.
Parzonko leaves
CELEBRITY TUNIS MAM Rod Sherman joins the meeting 4:10 PM. Sherman runs Management and
Sports Marketing, Inc. He is interested in promoting a tennis tournament
in Vail with the help of VMRD. Could possibly tie in charity(s) for
this event. Sherman gave the board a hand out (see attached). Sherman
said the format of the event is 32 celebrities playing with 32 playing
entrants, playing a round robin then switching to brackets. Can play
entire E4 draw tournament on. S courts. The celebrities can be mostly
sports people if the board wishes - possibly host an AFC/NFC tournament.
Sherman would like some decision from the board by their April meeting.
Garton suggested we make a decision by April to help Rod fast track
this event or let him know we do not wish to°parttcipate.
VMRD investment in this tournament would be $15,000. Dodson stated
VMRD could reduce their $15,000 obligation by soliciting other supporters
in Vail. Rod stated advertising is not in this proposal. The budget
could be zero by using charities or sponsors promoting the event. Rod
requested some initial feed back from Dodson within 10 days. The Board
would like this event to happen within June. Garton is concerned with
the Vail weather. We should make the size of the tournament to fit
the number of covered courts in the Vail area.
Rod Sherman leaves
CLUBHOUSE COySTRUCTIOR: Peter Looms, Andy Beck, Frank Payne join the meeting at 4:55 PM.
Chanoe orders and/or additional cost items
Board does not want to cut off the heating ducts in the restaurant.
Will just paint them and live with them for awhile.
Do not need Lexan Glazing
See attached March 9, 1987 letter from Dodson to Ruder:
I . Board will discuss Sackbauer aditional bills at the next meeting.
2. Peter Loors extra consultant bills - notification item to the Board
3. The board approved the sprinker system for $1,620
4. No glass doors in meeting room - stay with original door in contact.
5. No concrete slab east cart parking.
6. Kitchen improvements. Part of $56,000 so it is OK
7. Corsunication system for ranger/starter - table to another meeting.
Beck handed out a letter dated March 12, 1987 which gives the new
construction schedule. (see attached)
Nollcy wants to be informed of any meetings involving color choices
or decisions.
Knox asked if stucco is going to crack? Payne says all Portland products
crack. If stucco falls off the building, Beck guarantees it. Cracks
are not guaranteed.
Payne stated all roof leaks will be repaired. They had anticipated
the leaks because the roof was installed in the winter months.
Dodson stated Sackbauer needs authorizaticn.from •VMRD for a down payment
on the kitchen fire system before the drywall is installed in the kitchen.
$544.82 is the requested down payment. The Board will pay this amount
and recover it from the restaurant leassee. Knox moved to pay the $544.82
for the kitchen fire system pipes, second by Garton, passed unanimously.
COLLINS AGREEkM: Garton moved to accept Jim. Collins as VMRD's attorney and sign his
employment agreement, second by Knox, unanimously.
STARTER HOUSE AGIREEMEff: Garton moved to accept the Starter House 1986/87 Winter Use Agreement,
second by Knox, passed unanimously.
DO:`ATIONS: Garton made a motion to give:
Rotary Club - two 4-somes ?:ith carts and 1 resident tennis pass
Great Pace - one 4-same and 1 resident pass
Channel 6 Auction - two 4-serves with carts and 1 resident tennis pass
Second by Garton, passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF PO's: All POs were approved as presented except Sackbauer check and the workmens
compensation check pending further explair.aticn.
:TSTAUPAicT LESSEE: Satterstrom stated he v,,ill pay the District ;61,352 if he sells the
restaurar:t business. Satterstrom will write the District a check at
contract signing for the amount of Si4,100 which represents his portion
of FF&E. If the board exceeds this amount they will pay all excess
costs. Molloy made a motion to approve Steve Satterstrom as the
restaurant lessee and the contract drafted by Collins pending any chances
from Satterstrom's attorney, second by Garton, unanimously.
The board wants to eet Beth Slifer under contract for her interior design
services. Garton does not- rant to spend any more then :14,100 in the
restaurEnt FF&E package. If it runs over by $10,000 the board must
be called together to approve the additional funds. Garton leaves at
5:55 MI.
ADJOURMM: The meeting was adjourned at 6:00 PM,
Gail Volloy, Secretary
VIKRD AS SOLE RECREATION ENTITY
ADVANTAGES:
1. More intensive and involved management.
2. Single focus. The board's attention is not spread among a
wide variety of diverse issues.
3. Improved management due to n2.
4. One level of management (Town Manager) is eliminated from
recreation activities.
5. Narrow focus and limited agenda of board meetings may
encourage public participation.
6. Better mc--zag-_L:,;=Lt due to attraction of autonomous board.
TOV AS SOLE RECREATION ENTITY
ADVANTAGES:
1. Currently doing the bulk of recreation activities.
2. TOV Council is more visible to public through better attended
meetings and more thorough press coverage.
3. TOV has more financial options for recreation funding. In
periods of high inflation, V14RD may find it necessary to ask
the voters for a mill levy increase to maintain existing
programs (i..e., School District's current situation). The
Town also has better quality credit with slightly lower
borrowing costs.
4. One-step accountability--Public does not have to deal with
three or four different entities.
5. Marketing.
6. Operating and Capital prioritization is comprehensive.
Overall Vail goals and objectives can be considered in the
allocation of resources to recreation.
7. Reduced problems with coordination of park maintenance and
recreation activities.
104-&M* SpatslSml, W It 147 bdf NW11 in h
GOLF
Ski resort'All' cover a diffe"rent "'sport
attractive courses lure players to mountains _in .summer
By CLAY LATIMER and the thin mountain air allows them to hit
the ball farther, 0
Rocky Mountain News Staff Writer Crisp, cool air, clear nights, scenic moun-'
twin backdrops, and activities such as river.
One way ski resorts can attract summer rafting and hiking can be more enticing. r"? : >
business is by hiring internationally regard-; For that reason, some areas aggressivelq ;
ed golf course architects to design pictur market their courses in Phoenix, Texas and
esque layouts that challenge even the most other areas where the summers are hot and
advanced playem muggy. r i '~k1 h~ x 1
That was the theory 10 years ago, when Many offer package deals.
resorts such as Vail departed from convey- In Crested Butte, for example, golfers can s:s x, . { 7 T t !
tion and began to lure golfers stay at the Grande Butte Hotel and play one " The The idea has flourished, for now golfers round with a cart at Skyland Country Club ( ? A-1 Y
+ t ~zrfk 0 7~
cca~nn find an unusually demanding array of for as little as $43 a day. a, .K ?
distinctive courses throughout Colorado's In Steamboat, golfers can play as much as
high country. Although they are a secret to they want in one day and stay for one night " .ice r yxy~ rx= , .`r1
many golfers, the courses haven't gone un• at the Sheraton Steamboat Resort for as
noticed by everyone. little as $39.50.
TWO YEARS AGO, Goff Digest selected " Eighteen-hole greens fees vary from $28 r r of r 4 ` A7 >s
at Duran o's Tamarron Golf Club to $40 at t
Winter Park's Pole Creek Golf Club as the B f ~r
country's best new public course. Beaver Creek,
Three ears ago, the American Society of "We feel we have the best climate in the r T
Golf Course Architects included Skyland e- United States at this time of year, Glary
sort and Country Club in Crested Butte and said. "It's in the 80s, no humidity. We can get
Keystone Ranch Golf Club on its list of the the beat-the-heat people."
130 best-designed courses in the country. Resorts like golf for another reason: As 1• '
"In many ways, the mountains have be the baby-boom generation gets older, sports
a ' rr r
Clary, golf become morePPSlinB• Hamlin
• come a mecca for golfers," said Tom such as
hchd professional at Beaver Creek Go)t said golf is attracting 2.8 million new re-
Club. "The quality of the courses Is very cruits per year. Some converts are formers r
impressive, skiers who want a more sedate activity. .1 `a3
But we still have a perception problem in "You get to a certain age and you can't
some places, like in the East. They think tear down a slope like you once could," he said.
snow is on the ground all year round."
By luring golfers, resorts hoped to in- .
crease hotel room occupancy in the usually BUT GOLF CAN hardly compete with
slow summer months, attract more conven- skiing as a money-maker in the mountaim
tion and seminar business, and better sell Clary said Beaver Creek attracts a half-
real estate. million skiers a year.
To execute that plan successfully, the re-,. Golf brings in 20,000 guests. "
sorts had to hire some of the world's best , "Golf just complements skiing," he said.
golf course architects. "But it's growing. We envision the day when
Enter Robert Trent Jones, Jr. (Skyland, you have to stay in Beaver Creek to play in
Sheraton Steamboat Golf Club, Beaver Beaver Creek."
Creek) Pete Dye (Copper Creek Golf Club) Until the mid-1970x, golf was a foreign VON CNRISTOVNERSON/Spedal to ms Rpcky MountMn Nwe
and Jack Nic us (Country Club-of the. term many resort operators, although A survey of golf course architects Included the Skyland Country Club layout In
H Rockies in the Vail the Vail area). , " - mountain
ski Industry have existed for decades. Crested Butte among the 130 best courses In the country.
you'd the better have a course that draws," said Terry the construction of hotels and condominl " ' -
Hamlin, vice president of marketing and ums, areas such as Vail began to have a
sales for Skyland Resort and Country Club. problem.:. MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT COURSE DIRECTORY
'One of the appeals we make is that the, "You couldn't leave all those rooms empty
combination of the quality courses and in the summer," said Gary Linn, a designer
mountain terrain provide _ _ - _....T _
ae a real challenge to for Robert Trent Jones, Jr. "When you start- ASPEN
-
any golfer. We're marketing it that way ed having projects like Beaver Creek, golf Golf Course TN Access
right now. If you think you're a good golfer, started tagging along. Aspen Golf Course _ 925--214521451 ` Public - 18 holes '
prove it on a great course with terrain like "Before then, there wasn't a real chance AVON
tiffs." for golf to become a factor in the mountains. Beaver Creek Golf Club 949-7123 Private - 18 holes
THERE ARE OTHER lures: Golfers usual- Real estate, lodging, golf - now Its all F~91e Vail Golf Club 9494267 Resort- 18 holes .
ly don't have to worry about wafting to play, , inseparable. BRECKENRIDGE '
n : F„ • Breckenridge Golf Club,., J 453-9126 Publki -'18 holes
Mountain courses boomed z COPPER MOUNTAIN ' ' .
Copper Mountain Golf Club.:. - 968-2339 Resort = Public - 18 holes
? CRESTED BUTTE"
along with the . skiing. i nd ust SkylBnd Resort A Country Club 3494131 Resort -sl8 holes -
DuRANCO
? "Tsrnarron Inn and Golf Club 247-8801 ' Resort - Private - 18 holes
another said, 'We have to do it, too.' The " EDWARDS
By CLAY LATIMER money was really there." Country Club' of the Rockies y 476-1950. Private - 18 holes
Rocky Mountain News staff writer When designing mountain courses, archi-' Singletree Golf Club= 926 3533 Private - 18 holes-
tects often must use different types of grass KEYSTONE
~tobert Trent Jones Jr. and some of his and allow for conditions indigenous to the Keystone Ranch Golf Club , • 468-5283 Resort - 18 holes
competitors are busy building golf courses high attitude. SILVERTHORNE
in Japan, Australia and other far away spots. But it's not that big of a deal," said Linn.
But for a while, much of the action for the "A piece of land is a piece of land. The main Eagles Nest GC 468-0681 Publics - 18 holes
world's premier golf course architects wai_ lure,is the setting. It's nice to be in a moun- SNOWMASS.
in Colorado's mountains. tain setting instead of designing a course The Srlowmass Cluti'; : 923-5230 "s` Semi-Public - 18 holes` '
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS
Pete Dye, Jack Nicklaus, Jones, and sev-: around acul-de-sac." Y: r••' ' ' i,.~
erA,l other firms spent time in the Rocky-' -Some mountain resort courses have at- Sheraton Steamboat Golf Club- - 879-2220 Resort - 18 holes
Mftmtains recently taking advantage of a-, tracted national and even International at- Steamboat Springs Golf Club,'-' 679-4295 Public - 9 holes
sudden spurt in golf-course _ction. . tention for the quality of their design and , " . t . . .4,1- . VAIL
"When the ski Industry boomed, golf went distinctive challenges. Vail Golf Club 476-1330 Public - 18 holes .
with it," said Gary Linn, a designer for. "Everyone seemed to do good work," said WINTER PARK
Jones. "It was really hot in the late 1970s • Linn. "There was a lot of pressure, because Pole Creek Golf Club 726-8968 Public - 18 holes
and early 1980s. A lot of it was a catch-up with that kind of money, if you do one poorly
thing. One area was building a course, so r ¦
Tyrrell Realty
REC'D APR 1 71987
AVON DUSINESS SERVICE CENTER
331 MEfCALF ROAD 0 AVON, COLORADO
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OfFlCE (30X 3100
VAIL, COLOMDO 81658
30.1/949-5100
April 15, 1987
Town of Vail
Attn: Ron Phillips, Town Manager
75 S. Frontage Rd. W.
Vail, C0. 81557
Re: Special Improvement District for West Vail paving.
Dear Ron,
This will confirm my comments made at the Town Council meeting on April 7,
1987.
As regards the Special Improvement Dsitrict I wear several hats (owner,
partner and manager of two properties). I will identify my perspective
with my comments.
As owner of one Pine Ridge Townhouse and as a Qartner in another I am in .
favor of the Special Imnrovement District. I agree with the method of
assessment. I look forward to completion of the new paving.
As manager of the Pine Ridge Townhouses I have received information from
your staff that satisfies my concerns. The 65%/35% split for Chamonix Lane
(a bus route) is equitable. The drainage issue has been addressed.
Further, we should have a smooth transition between the existing and the new
paved areas.
As manager of the West Vail "9a11 I object to its inclusion.in the Special
Improvement District because of the following:
a. The Mall has no direct access to the streets in question.
b. Very little, if any, of the traffic at the Mall arrives by bus. We
are dependent upon automobile traffic.
c. The primary flow of the bus service carries people to Vail Village
and Lionshead retail areas. The bus brings few owners, guests or employees
to the Mall.
d. Part of the success of the bus service is to take employees to Vail
Village and Lionshead thereby relieving pressure on core area parking.
With no direct access and with very little benefit from bus traffic, an
assessment of $5,800.00 cannot be justified.
Additionally, the Nlall contributes substantial amounts to The Town in
property taxes and sales tax revenues. I estimate sales at the Mall to
be in excess of four million dollars. The Town's annual portion of these
sales taxes revenues would be in excess of $160,000.00. The P4a11 makes
its contribution and should not be doubly assessed.
Thank you for your consideration of my comments. I'll be happy to meet
with you or the Town Council to discuss this in greater detail.
As always, my thanks to you and your staff for the prompt response to
my questions.
Very truly yours, ,
TYRRELL REALTY
,
a . 1
DJT/eah
ReIJ
FYTE
~y
ton, of voil doportmoot of police
box 567 • vail, colorado 81658 • 303-476-5671
PRESS RELEASE: April 17, 1987 Contact: Ken Hughey
Brian Terrett
The Vail Police Department has completed the second phase of an
on-going undercover drug operation with the arrest of 4 peop(e
and seizure of '~j vehicles. Although coordinated by the Vail Police
Department, there has been on-going assistance and involvement by
the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration, the Eagle County Sheriff's
Office, and Deputy District Attorney Terri Diem. This operation has
been in process for about one year, with the majority of the effort
occurring in the last six months.
The cost of the operation is estimated to be about $10, 000 in cash and
approximately 1,000 manhours by law enforcement personnel. This
resulted in the pLlrchase of ;us*_ under 5 ez. of cocaine from t!-ie
individuais arrested. This operation once again emphasizes the
commitment by the Town of Vai) and law enforcement in Eagle County
to identify drug traffickers and take the measures necessary to put
them out of business.
It should be noted that more arrests are expected.
Dennis Neai Beckel
white male
date of birth: July 21, 1947
residence: Redcliff
charges: 1 count of Unlawful Sale of a Controlled Substance
18-18-105 (2) (a) F-3
monies and charges - Vail Police Department
bond - $15,000
Timothy James Cochrane
white male
date of birth: March 8, 1950
residence: Edwards
charges: 1 count of Unlawful Sale of a Controlled Substance
18-18-105 (2) (a) F-3
monies and charges - Vail Police Department
bond - $7, 500
Hugh Allen Paine
white male
date of birth: March 2, 1960
residence: Vail
charges: 2 counts of Unlawful Sale of a:Control(ed Substance
18-18-105 (2) (a) F-3
monies and charges - Vail Police Department
bond - $35, 000
John Robert Rollins, Jr.
white male
date of birth: August 8, 1952
residence: Eagle-Vail
charges: 3 counts of Unlawful Sale of a Controiled Substance
18-18-105 (2) (a) F-3
monies and charges - Eagle County Sheriff's Office
bond - $25,000