HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-07-07 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1987
2:00 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Joint Meeting with Planning and Environmental Commission
2. Discussion of Children's Fountain Sculpture Design
3. Discussion of Trophee Revillon Dog Sled Race
4. Discussion of Local Collection of Sales Tax
5. Discussion of Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1987, Hillside Residential
Zone District
6. Discussion of Vacation of Utility Easement on the North Side of the
Sitzmark Property
7. Information Update
8. Other
9. Site Visit to Ford Park to See Proposed Location for the Aquatic
Facility
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1987
2:00 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
2:00 1. Town Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting
Action Requested of Council: Offer comments on the issues
presented concerning density variances that have been
reviewed recently (and in the review process now).
Background Rationale: A variety of density variances have
been approved in recent months. These actions have run
contrary to previous decisions over the past few years.
Discussion of this issue is needed to clarify the precedent
setting nature of these decisions and what steps can be
taken to address these requests in the future.
3:00 2. Discussion of Children's Fountain Sculpture Design
Kristan Pritz
Action Requested of Council: Review and give the final
approval.
Background Rationale: On July lst, the DRB recommended that
the project proceed to Council for final approval. Twelve
local sculptures plus one piece from New York will be
installed for the dedication ceremony on July llth. T"e DRB
was very pleased with the applicant's efforts to respond to
the DRB's design concerns.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the proposal.
3:20 3. Discussion of Trophee Revillon Dog Sled Race
Pat Dodson
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny the lower bench
of Ford Park for housing dog houses and dogs during the
race.
Backqround Rationale: VRA has requested a location to house
the dogs and their trailers while in Vail and is
recommending the two day dog sled race happen on the Uail
golf course. They will be in Vail a total of 6 days to get
acclimated to the altitude.
Staff Recommendation: Hold the race on tre golf course if
certain conditions can be met (see memo in your packet).
Also, VMRD has approved the race.
3:40 4. Discussion of Local Collection of Sales Tax
Charlie Wick
Steve Barwick Action Requested of Council: Direct staff to proceed with
revision of the sales tax ordinance for the purpose of local
collection.
Background Rationale: The Administrative Services Dept. has
evaluated the feasibility of a local sales tax collection
program and wants to share this information with the
Council.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the implementation
of a local sales tax collection program in light of the
results of the sales tax collection analysis.
3:55 5. Discussion of Ordinance No. 23, Hillside Residential Zone
Rick Pylman District
Action Requested of Council: Hear update on background and
philosophy of zone district.
Background Rationale: An element of the Land Use Plan was
the creation of.a new zone district entitled Hillside
Residential. Community Development staff has designed a
district that we feel meets the intent of the Land Use
Plan. The ordinance will be presented at the Evening
Meeting Tuesday for fiirst reading.
4:15 6. Discussion of Vacation of Utility Easement on the North Side
Kristan Pritz of the Sitzmark Property
Action Requested of Council: Discuss and make any necessary
corrections on the vacation. The request will be reviewed
as a resolution at the July 21st Evening meeting if the
Council approves the request. (Applicant: Bob Fritch)
Staff Recommendation: Approve the request with any
requested corrections.
4:30 7. Information Update
Ron Phillips
4:40 8. Other
4:45 9. Site Visit to Ford Park to See Proposed Location for the
Kristan Pritz Aquatic Facility
Action Requested of Council: None.
Background Rationale: The Swimming Pool Task Force feels
that it will be helpful to walk the proposed site for the
pool before the final consultant presentation to better
understand how the facility relates to other uses in Ford
Park.
-2-
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 7, 1987
SUBJECT: Children's Fountain Sculpture Final Review
On July l, 1987, the Design Review Board made a recommendation
to the Town Council that the Children's Fountain Sculpture
project be approved. The applicants have taken the Design
Review Board recommendations and have revised their design to
locate the sculptures on boulders within the walls of the
fountain. The applicants amended the drawing at the DRB
meeting by agreeing to move all the boulders into the center
area of the fountain. This change will allow for a more
dramatic grouping of the sculptures and also allow people to
walk into the fountain more easily.
Twelve sculptures from the Vail area and one sculpture from New
York City will be placed in the fountain in time for the July
llth dedication. Five flower baskets designed by Robert Lepper
have been added to the fountain wall. A small portion of the
wall is proposed to be removed in order to add symmetry to the
openings in the fountain wall. The remainder of the wall will
provide areas for seating and also protect the fountain from
trash.
Mr. Deane Knox has agreed to maintain the sculptures and the
flower baskets for the first two years after the project is
installed the week of July 7th. The Town of Vail will be
responsible for installing the lights into the inside of the
fountain wall and maintaining the fountain after the two year
period.
The applicants are commended for working so closely with the
Design Review Board and staff on a difficult design problem. It
is felt that a fine design solution has been arrived at through
their cooperation.
o
6° e,ti o 0
y~ J/ O ~iwr . ~ f• \
r1.GO o Id.rlpi
{in
• O O ~
' ~ ?s
C - ~ .
I-D lD
16J~"~r~
~
O
~ ~ ~ ~ Do, , • ~
.
Lx-,L.+
, ~y : ~ :...w - o cTz 3 o s~ ~ [-s
Roxovc- e.,usnN&, / , ~y'~~~ ~1 0 ~ •`;'1 r,• ~
, ~
•.y ' , ?
r---
U,\..__
Oo. ~
~ •
~ ..aOO
0
~
~ p~;c~~1dP1S wi~~
l~c- ~D(DG~' i n~~ \4i MU5
~..p, 1
6(Lpr1zP QO p5 tu rrIl-
PW~Ztti Fo2 gcu~pr'2F
~
Gta.~~Dratr'~s S SC'u L.Pr+¢.F HouwYE'D oN f3ou~~E12s "
.
~ - -
<.,]A'. Q~
J ' •~~5~~
~ ~At
_
w 20 64 'f I 20 ~._t FwLo ETZ, fSc.Z sc ~-r-S
~
, O RON PHILLIPS
FROM PAT DODSON
t
,
DATE JUNE 16, 1987
SUBJECT TROPHEE REVILLON 1988 - INTERNATIONAL DOG SLED RACE
VRA has been working with VMRD to secure the Vail Golf Course for
the Trophee Revillon dog sled race to be held in Vail during the
WinterFaire 188. There will be approximate 12 teams, 180-216 dogs with 12 mushers. They will race approximately 8 miles on the golf
course. The dogs and mushers will arrive on January 8, 1988,
eight days before the event to acclimate to the altitude.
After several meetings, Shelby and i feel Ford Park (lower bench)
will be the best location to house the dogs, mushers and trailers.
Ford Park will provide easy access via dog sled past the Nature
Center and out onto the golf course for their daily run. During
the days the dogs are staked out on picket lines with short chains
(they bark). At night they are put in kennels (there is no
noise).
VMRD would like to see the race held and agreed at their last
meeting to let them use the Vail golf course providing there is
adequate snow coverage, and the mushers address dog droppings so
the grass is not harmed in the spring.
I think it is important to take this to the Town Council as soon
as possible so they can decide if Ford Park is in fact the area to
house the dogs. We can then finalize the agreement with Trophee
Revillon through the VRA.
Please find attached a copy of a press release with more detailed
information.
.
° c25 C~ ° T °zW'o AM0N
241 E. Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657
FOR I,%IMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Stacy Gardner
April 7, 1987 Manager, Media Relations
` (303) 476-1000, ext. 32
Jan Dwyer
Director of Advertising
. and Public Relations
Revillon/NY
(212) 563-4122
Vail, Colo.--Vail has been selected as the site for Troph4le Revillon 1988,
the international dog sled race sponsored by Revillon, Paris, preeminent name
in fine furs worldwide.
Trophde Revillon was inaugurated this past January at Meribel and Courchevel,
in the French Alps, where.10 teams, 180 dogs and 10 mushers representing nine
countries competed over three days for the best time on the 7 1/2-mile course.
Troph--<e Revillon was the first international speed trial competition to bring
s
together the fastest 12-dog teams of each country, and coverage by journalists
from-around the world made the race one of the most highly publicized in
Europe, immediately establishing Troph6e Revillon as an important new name in
international sports competition.
The house of Revillon, founded in 1753, introduced fur garments as fashioa
and pioneered the let-out skin process, which revolutionized craftsmanship in
luxury furs. Revillon is represented in the United States by 41 salons exclu-
sive to Saks Fifth Avenue, as well as Revillon boutiques in Denver and Aspen
and at Gorsuch in Vail. In Europe,there are two Revillon boutiques in Paris--
with a third to open there in September--and boutiques in Cannes and London.
Complementing its furs is a collection of accessories, including handbags,
scarves and sunglasses, as well as Detchema and Turbulences fragrances for
women and French Line for men.
-more-
CENTRAL RESERVA710NS • (303) 476-5677
MARKE7'WG/CHAMBER SERVICES •(303) 476-1000 • Denver Line 595-9488
•
TROPHEE REVILLON INTERNATIONAL DOG SLED RACE
Trophee Revillon, on it's second anniversary, comes to Vail to join in
it's 25th Anniversary celebration as part of WinterFaire '88. From
January 13 to 18, Revillon and Vail will be co-hosts to five European
and seven North American teams, as well as more than 300 guests and
journalists from around the world. This event will create exposure
Internationally as well as nationally.
TEAMS
Estimated 12 teams, 180-216 dogs, 12 mushers (average musher 35-42 years- 1
last years winner was 45).
COURSE
Normally 10-12 miles, with minimum 6 miles. Vail's course will be about 8
miles which would be adequate with the altitude. A wide hard pack track
would be required and the course must not ever cross.
LOCATION
Vail Golf Course would be the local location for media coverage, specatators
and easy access. ,
HOUSING
Dogs and mushers will arrive on January 8, eight days before the event to
get used to the altitude. The ideal location to store the dogs would be
the lower area of Ford Park. This would be accessable to the course, yet
out of the way of the public. The dogs will be kept in kennel trucks
(doggie condos) at night, staked up outside on picket lines with short
chains during the day with training sessions on the course each day.
RACE
The race will be held three days, January 14-17. The race is a speed trial
competition. It will be held in the morning each day, starting at 10:00 am
and finishing around noon.
CLEAN-UP
Revillon (mushers) will be in charge of cleaning up the dog excrement
each day on the course as well as housing locations.
~
~
1~
lowo, ot uai ~
75 south frontage road
vail, colorado 81657
(303) 476-7000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Phillips
FROM: Charlie Wick
Steve Barwick
Rich Parzonko
DATE: July 2, 1987
RE: Local Collection of Sales Tax
The Town financial staff is recommending that Vail switch from
state collection of sales tax to a system of local collection on
January 1, 1988. The current method of collection entails Vail
businessmen remitting sales tax to the state by the 20th day
following the end of a month. The state then compiles the data .
and sends a check to the Town of Vail 30 days later. Local
collection of sales taxes would have several significant
advantages and only a few disadvantages as outlined below.
ADVANTAGES OF LOCAL COLLECTION
Accelerated remittance of collections. The monthly 30-day delay
' in remittance of revenues to the Town of Vail would disappear.
The net effect of this acceleration is that Vail will be able to
recognize 13 months of sales tax revenue during the first year of
this program. That is, for a program starting on January 1, 1988,
the Town will recognize sales tax revenue for the period December,
1987, through December, 1988. Therefore, 1988 sales tax revenues
will be approximately $1.2 million reater than they otherwise
would be. Staff proposes using part or all of this additional
$1.2 million to fund the Visitor Center/Town Hall remodel project.
SALES TAX MEMO
JULY 2, 1987
PAGE 2
Control of sales tax base. With the exception of a few items
(e.g. food), the Town of Vail must utilize the same sales tax base
as the state. Local collection of sales tax would allow Vail to
expand its sales tax base to include such items as ski rentals,
telecommunications, hotel room movie services and others if
desired.
While it may seem relatively unimportant to make such small
changes in the sales tax base, such changes can in fact produce
significant revenue. For example, a reasonably conservative
estimate of revenues from taxing ski rentals is $80,000 per year.
Town staff is proposing that the sales tax base be expanded to
include several new items with the resulting revenue to be used to
fund new capital projects.
More effective collection and enforcement. State auditing
activities are very limited. A properly administered local
program will do a much more thorough job of educating businesses
as to their collection and remittance responsibilities and in
following up with audits where appropriate.
It is estimated that the Town will be able to garner at least
$30,000 annually from the increased audit activity. This estimate
is supported by recent experience in Breckenridge and numerous
front range communities.
Earlier knowledge of recei ts. With the elimination of the
current state-related delays, the Town of Vail will know the level
of monthly sales tax receipts approximately two weeks earlier.
Control of sales tax reporting. Some local lodges currently
report sales taxes for lodging and restaurants in a combined
format. This makes analysis of the various sectors of Vail's
economy virtually impossible. Under a local collection program,
we could require separation of these activities for reporting
purposes.
DISADVANTAGES OF LOCAL COLLECTION
Increased administrative costs. After investigating the staffing
patterns of cities which collect their own sales tax, the Town
staff recommends the hiring of a full-time sales tax auditor. The
full annual expense for such an employee is expected to be
approximately $32,000 with an additional initial set up cost of
$3,000-$4,000. Annual forms and mailing costs will amount to
approximately $1,000.
SALES TAX MEMO
JULY 2, 1987
PAGE 3
Administrative burden for businesses. Local collection requires
businesses to fill out a second monthly sales tax report and to
become familiar with the municipal base (if it differs from the
state's). However, this should be only a minor burden since the
second sales tax report will be identical in form and will be
filled out at the same time using the same information. Local
businesses may also be subject to a greater number of sales tax
audits than is currently the case.
Effective Date. In order to effectuate the program on January 1,
1988, there is lead time needed to hire a person and to establish
the necessary administrative systems and policies. To meet the
January 1 deadline, we need an individual hired_by October 1,
1987. The additional cost to the 1987 budget will be
approximately $13,000, which would have to be funded through
supplemental appropriation.
SUMMARY
The Town of Vail is allowing nearly $7.8 million per year (over
half of the Town's revenues) to be collected, administered and
watched over by another entity - an entity which is not doing a
very good job. We have the opportunity to solve this problem and
make $1.2 million (one time only) available for use by switching
to a local sales tax collection program. Clearly, the cost of
such a program is small in comparison to the potential benefits.
SHB/ds
ORDINANCE N0. 23
Series of 1987
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 18.09 TO THE VAIL MUNICIPAL
CODE, SUCH CHAPTER TO BE ENTITLED HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,
AND SETTING FORTH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUCH ZONE DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has adopted a Land Use Plan as development policy,
and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Plan of the Town of Vail designates certain areas for
low density hillside development, and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Plan of the Town of Vail recommends the creation of such
a zone district, and -
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommends to the Town
Council adoption of said district, and
WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to adopt a new zone district entitled
Hillside Residential zone district.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO,
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Chapter 18.09 is hereby added to the Vail Municipal Code to read as follows:
Hillside Residential (HR) District
18.09
Sections:
18.09.010 Purpose
18.09.020 Permitted Uses
18.09.030 Conditional Uses
18.09.040 Accessory Uses
18.09.050 Lot Area and Site Dimensions
18.09.060 Setbacks
18.09.070 Height
18.09.080 Density Control .
18.09.090 Site Coverage
18.09.110 Landscaping and Site Development
18.09.120 Parking
18.09.010 Purpose
The Hillside Residential District is intended to provide sites for low density
single family residential uses, together with such public facilities as may be
appropriately located in the same district. The Hillside Residential District is
intended to insure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling,
commensurate with single family occupancy, and to maintain the desirable low
density high quality residential development of such sites by establishing
appropriate site development standards.
18.09.020 Permitted Uses
The following uses shall be permitted in the HR District:
Single family residential dwellings
One caretaker apartment per lot
18.09.030 Conditional Uses
The following conditional uses shall be permitted, subject to issuance of a
conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60:
A. Public utility and public service uses
B. Public buildings, grounds and facilities
C. Public park and recreation facilities
D. Equestrian centers located on 5 acre minimum lot size common area.
18.09.040 Accessory Uses
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the HR District:
A. Private greenhcuses, tool sheds, playhouses, garages or carports, swimming
pools, patios, or recreational facilities customarily incidental to single
family uses.
B. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190.
C. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional
uses, and necessary for the operation thereof.
18.09.050 Lot Area and Site Dimensions .
The minimum lot or site area shall be twenty-one thousand, seven hundred eighty
(21,780) square feet of contiguous buildable area. Each site shall have a minimum
frontage of fifty feet. Each site shall be of a size and shape capable of
enclosing a square eighty feet on each side within its boundaries.
18.09.060 Setbacks
In the HR district, minimum front setbacks shall be twenty feet, minimum side
setbacks shall be fifteen feet, and minimum rear setbacks shall be fifteen feet.
18.09.070 Height
For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty
feet. For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty-three
feet.
18.09.080 Density Control
Not more than a total of two dwelling units shall be permitted on each site. Not
more than twenty square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be
permitted for each ore hundred square feet for the first twenty-one thousand seven
hundred eighty (21,780) square feet of site area, plus not more than five square
feet of gross residential floor area shall be permitted for each one hundred square
feet of site area over twenty-one thousand seven hundred eighty (21,780) square
feet. On any site containing two dwelling units, one of the units shall not
exceed twelve hundred (1,200) square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA).
This unit shall not be subdivided or sold separately from the main dwelling. This
unit may be integrated into the main dwelling or may be integrated within a garage
structure serving the main unit, but shall not be a separate freestanding
structure.
18.09.090 Site Coverage
Not more than fifteen (15) percent of the total site area shall be covered by
buildings.
18.09.110 Landscaping and Site Development
At least seventy (70) percent of each site shall be landscaped. The minimum width
and length of any area qualifying as landscaping shall be ten feet with a minimum
area of not less than three hundred square feet.
18.09.120 Parking
Off-street shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52.
Section 2.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
tl~e remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it
would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 3.
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal
Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued,
any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof,
any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or
by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any
provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCEDf READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of ,
1987, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of
, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this day of , 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this day of , 1987.
Paul R. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 7, 1987
SUBJECT: Hillside Residential Zone District
Through the Land Use Plan process, there was identified a need
for a new low density residential zone district. The Land
Use Plan has identified several sites for potential
development, but has stressed that that development should be
at a density lower than that permitted by our existing
residential districts. The staff has been working with the
criteria in the Land Use Plan to develop this zone district.
Sections of the Land Use Plan applicable to this zone district
along with our final draft have been included in with this
memo.
The staff presented an original draft to the Planning and
Environmental Commission, and since then we have spent several
meetings refining the language to more closely parallel the
Planning Commission's perception of the intent of the Hillside
Residential District as identified through the Land Use Plan.
The four main issues the staff and the Planning Commission
discussed as important elements to the Hillside Residential
zone district were:
l. Minimum lot size
2. Allowable GRFA
3. Size of the caretaker unit
4. Location and siting of the caretaker unit
The Land Use Plan identifies the Hillside Residential Zone
District as a density of two units per acre. Minimum lot size
therefore has been set at 21,780 square feet. That is one half
of an acre which meets Land Use Plan direction of two units per
acre. The interpretation of two units was discussed by the
staff and Planning Commission to mean two primary units and not
the primary unit and the caretaker unit as the two units per
acre.
We have developed a formula to assess GRFA to these lot sizes.
A work sheet giving examples of different GRFA formulas is
enclosed in your packet. The formula that was derived allows
20% of the buildable area up to the minimum lot size and 5% of
developable area above the minimum lot size. The staff chose
this formula over many others because we felt it met the
direction given by the Planning Commission in our work
sessions. That direction from the PEC was to allow enough GRFA
at minimum lot size to accommodate the type of development
desired and to also prevent over development of each lot by
allowing too much GRFA.
The allowable size of the caretaker unit had been discussed of
possibly being a ratio of the allowable GRFA. Discussion with
the PEC resolved around the fact that we wanted this to be a
true caretaker unit and not a secondary unit as is allowed
through the Primary/Secondary zoning. As a result, we set a
maximum square footage for the caretaker unit at 1200 square
feet. We feel this is an adequate size for a true caretaker
unit.
The fourth issue we discussed was the location of the caretaker
unit in relation to the primary unit. The Planning Commission
felt that a carriage house type of development with a caretaker
unit located in a garage structure would be appropriate. The
PEC did feel that the caretaker unit should be integrated into
the main unit or into a garage structure and should not be a
separate freestanding structure. We have attemped to reflect
this desire in the wording of the Hillside Residential Zone
District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
In conclusion, staff is comfortable with this zone district as
it is currently written. We feel the work of the staff and the
Planning Commission has produced a zone district that meets the
intent and direction of the Land Use Plan.
~ .
. ~ .
iHR1 ~ 6RFA WDRKSHEET
a. 25-2i 7a0
~ 0.1-21780-4356
a.o`-43560 ~
~ LQT SIZE 6RFA MAIN 11NIT @75X CAkETAKEk @25X 6RFAS.15,.05? GRFA(.15,.10} 6RFa{.20,.05)
21726 5445 4084 13351 3261 3267 4356
~ 22000 5467 4160 1367 3278 3284 4367
2'000 5567 4115 1392 3328 3369 4417
24000 5661 4250 1411 33i8 3489 4467
~ 2.000 5767 4325 1442 3428 3584 4111
26000 5567 4400 1467 3478 3689 4567
21000 5967 4415 1492 3526 3789 4611
~ 28000 6067 4550 1517 3578 3889 4661
, 29000 6157 4625 1542 3628 3989 4711
30004 6267 4700 1567 3676 4089 4767
31040 6367 47175 1592 7172B 4189 4811
' 32UQt1 6467 485U 1617 377B 4289 4867
37)000 6567 4925 1642 3828 4389 4917 ~ 34000 6667 5040 1661 3878 4489 4967
3500(1 6767 51105 1692 3928 4589 5411
3E000 6861 515:0 1711 3978 4689 5067
37000 6467 5225 1142 4028 4189 5117
38060 7061 53QU 1767 4078 4889 5167
34000 7167 5375 1792 4128 4989 5217
~ 40000 7267 5450 1817 4118 5089 5257
4S(~~i~1 7367 I842 4228 5189 5311
42000 7461 5600 1867 4278 5289 5367
~ 4300i? 7567 151615 1892 4328 5389 5411
44000 7645 5734 1911 4378 5489 5467
45000 1695 5771 1924 4428 5589 5517
~ 46000 7745 5809 1936 4478 5689 5567
47060 7745 5846 1949 4528 5789 5617
4BOQ0 7845 5884 1961 4518 5889 5667
44000 7895, 5921 1974 4528 5969 5717
50000 7945 5959 1986 4678 6084 5767
l Ac2,c 4356t1 7GL? 57I7 I?OG 4356 5445 5445
~ a q64C5- 13068Q 11974 8084 2495 871nL 14157 9801
3,l(..ZF- 114240 14357 10619 3539 10890 185] 3 11979
y kC2,5- 217800 16335 12251 4094 13068 22869 14157
~ p p 0 U 0 D
~
~
L
-
. .
F. That hillsides should also be assessed, taking constraints into con-
sideration.
~ G. That the Village and Lionshead Core Areas would remain essentially the
same, with the addition of a transition area to strengthen the connec-
tion between the two core areas. Several new land use categories aimed
~ at strengthenng hotel and other tourist-oriented uses were also added.
4. Proposed Land Use Categories
~ New land use categories were defined to indicate general types of land uses
which should occur within the Town during the planning period. These cate-
gories were varied from the existing land use categories to reflect the
~ goals of the community more accurately. The specific land uses are listed
as examples and are not intended to reflect an all-inclusive list of uses.
Uses would be controlled by zoniny. These categories are indicated below.
~ LDR Low Density Residential
This category includes single-family detached homes and two family
~ dwelling units. Density of development within this category would
typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable acre. Also within
this area would be private recreation facilities such as tennis
~ courts, swimning pools and club houses for the use of residents of the
area. Institutional/public uses permitted would include churches,
fire stations, and parks and open space related facilities.
~ MDR Medium Density Residential
The medium density residential category includes housing which would
~ typically be designed as attached units with common walls. Densities
in this category would range from 3 to 14 dwelling units per buildable
acre. Additional types of uses in this category would include private
~ recreation facilities, private parking facilities and institutional/
public uses such as parks and open space, churches, and fire stations.
~ HDR High Density Residential
The housing in this category would typically consist of multi-floored
structures with densities exceedin 15 dwellin units
~ 9 g per buildable
acre. Other activities in this category would include private recrea-
tional facilities, and private parking facilities and institutional/
public uses such as churches, fire stations and parks and open space
~ facilities.
IH Hillside Residential
~ This category would allow for single family dwelling units at densi-
ties no more than two dwelling units per buildable acre. Also permit-
ted would be typical single family accessory uses such as private
~ recreational amenities, attached caretaker units, or employee units
and garayes. Institutional/public uses would also be permitted.
These areas would require sensitive development due to slopes, access,
~ visibility, tree coverage and geologic hazards. Minimum buildable
area of 20,000 square feet would be required per dwelling unit. (See
Chapter VIII for more specific discussion of implementation.)
~ 32
,
5. "Preferred Plan" Land Use Pattern
The "Existing Trends" alternative was chosen as the preferred land-use
plan and was carefully reviewed area by area to assess feasibility and ~
compatibility with adjacent existing land uses. Some modifications
were then made in proposed new areas of inedium and high density because ~
of potential land use and neighborhood conflicts. The pattern which is ~
reflected on tne "Preferred Plan" is discussed below. i
A. Residential Uses i
1. Low Density Uses. '
Low density residential uses are now planned for a total of 699.0
acres, or about 21°6 of the land in the plan area, which is an ;
increase of 3% over the area presently in low density residential
use. These areas reflect the completion of existing platted pro-
jects, with some additional areas added adjacent to the single
family areas at low densities. The 8% increase reflects the large
number of undeveloped, platted lots already existing in Vail. ~
2. Medium and High Density Uses.
Medium and high density residential areas now account for a total
of approximately 15% of the land in tne plan area, with 421 acres
i n the medi um densi ty category and 68.5 acres i n tne hi gh densi ty
category. This is a 4% increase in land area devoted to these two
land use designations, reflecting a need to accommodate additional .
market demand for multi-family uses. Fur the most part, these i
multi-family areas have been kept consistent with the pattern of `
existing land use witn additional multi-family occurring within !
unfinished projects and adjacent to these multi-family areas. Some i
new areas of high density residential have been added, specifically ~
in east Vail between the frontage road and I-70, where access is ;
good and surrounding land uses would be compatible for this type of ;
use. Other areas, north of I-70 where existing land uses are mixed
containing both low and medium density uses have been shown as ~
medium density to meet the dernand for additional multi-family ;
dwelling units within the 15-year planning period. j
3. Hillside Residential.
The new category of land use types "Hillside Residential" covers a
portion of two large parcels. These parcels account for 33.3 acres
or a total of 1.0% of the land use area within the plan area.
,
These parcels were desigriated in tiiis category to allow the possi-
bility for limited development if certain criteria could be met.
Any development proposed would require the evaluation on a case-
by-case basis, accompanied by an in-depth analysis, to assure sen-
sitivity to constraints, provision of adequate access, minimization
of visibility from the Valley floor, and compatibility with sur-
rounding land uses. Any such development would be required to meet
all applicable Town ordinances and regulations. (See Chapter VIII for more specific information on implementation.)
,
• 35 ;
j ~ CHAPTER VIII - IMPLEMENTATION
The Land Use Plan developed as a result of this effort will become a part
of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, which in it.s entirety will serve to guide
growth within the Town of Vail for the next 15 years. The Land Use Plan is
not intended to be regulatory in nature but is intended to provide a
general framework to guide decision making. Specific implementation
measures should be undertaken to assure that the intent of th Plan is
carried forward throughout the life of the Plan.
Such measures should include changes to ordinances and regulations or
policies adopted by the Town. These measures should also include develop-
ing a system by which the Plan may be continuously monitored and periodic-
ally amended. This is important because the planning process is one of
continuous evolution with data, public opinion and market forces changing
over time. /
1. Land Use Regulation Analysis The zoning and subdivision regulations should be analyzed carefully to
assure that objectives of the Land Use Plan may be met. While an in-depth
analysis of these regulations is not within the scope of this project, some
general recommendations may be made concerning new land use categories
developed for the Land Use Plan. The following categories should be
reviewed for compatibility with the zoning regulations.
A. Hillside Residential
This new category will require the adoption of a new zoning category,
which would allow for single-family residential units at a maximum
density of two per acre, with a minimum buildable area of 20,000
square feet of contiguous area per unit. Allowance should also be
made for an employee or guest housing unit to be built as an accessory
unit attached to the primary living unit or garage. The existing
regulations for access to subdivisions and for control of hazard areas
should still be applicable.
:
B. Community Office
; 7his category would require a review of the Arterial Business District
zoning category to ensure that permitted and conditional uses were
broad enough to be consistent with the objectives established with the
` Land Use Plan.
C. Transition
~ This area would, require an analysis of the actual zoning along West
Meadow Drive to ensure that the purposes of the transition district
1 could be met.
D. High Density Residential
The actual location of the parcels of high density residential should
~ be analyzed to determine a suitable minimum lot area permissible for
high density development. The present high density zone district has
1 the requirement of a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet of build-
able area. It is conceivable that this minimum would not be adequate
in some cases and may need to be increased to 20,000 square feet.
~ 59
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: July 7, 1987
SUBJECT: Vacation of a utility easement on the northwest side
of the Sitzmark property
I. REQUEST
The Sitzmark Lodge is requesting to vacate a 10 foot
utility easement located on the northwest corner of their
property. A portion of the new building is proposed to be
located on this easement.
II. BACKGROUND ON THE REQUEST
The original 10 foot utility easement was created by Vail
Associates during the original plat process for Vail
Village First Filing. In 1974, it was determined that a
portion of the Sitzmark building encroached into the 10
foot utility easement. A partial vacation and abandonment
of the existing 10 foot utility easement and a grant of a new easment was completed in June of 1974. This agreement
vacated the easement below the existing Sitzmark building
and relocated the easement to the northwest of the
easement on Town of Vail property. Please see the
attached agreement concerning this easement.
In the spring of 1987, the Sitzmark project was reviewed
by the Design Review Board. One of the required submittal
documents was a title report. Staff allowed the project
to begin demolition before the title report had been
submitted. Once the title report was submitted, it was
determined that the easement would have to be vacated in
order for the construction to proceed. At that time, the
staff had the understanding that the easement only
involved utility companies and did not involve the Town of
Vail. The applicant submitted letters from the utility
companies verifying that they had no problem with vacation
of the easement and that they would allow the Sitzmark to
proceed with their construction. Upon further
investigation of the title report, it became evident that
. the Town Council would also have to sign off on the
easement vacation. This understanding was reached the
week of June 29th. The staff worked with the applicant to
prepare the vacation easement for the work session so that
the building permit would not be held up any longer than
absolutely necessary.
Attached to this memo you will find a vacation and
abandonment agreement as well as appropriate signatures.
On Tuesday, the applicant will submit the legal
description and stamped survey of the actual easement
being vacated on Sitzmark property. The only additional
signature that is needed on the vacation and abandonment
agreement is that of the Public Service Company. However,
we do have an original letter from Gary Hall, Public
Service Company representative, dated May 28, 1987 which
states that the Public Service Company "is in the proces
of executing an abatement of this easement and they have
no problem with the Sitzmark building on it." The Town
Engineer has reviewed this request and has no problem with
the vacation.
Once these two final pieces of information are submitted,
the staff will present the resolution vacating the
easement at an evening meeting. In addition, if the Town
Council does not have a problem with the vacation, the
staff would like to proceed to issue the building permit
immediately after the work session review.
I
r
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENT
THIS INSTRUMENT is made this / day of rL' ~y 1987,
by and between THE SITZMARK AT VAIL, INC., a Colora o
corporation, ("Owner") and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,
(for itself and as assignee of, or successor in interest to, GAS
FACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporation) and HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC
ASSOCIATION, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and VAIL WATER AND
SANITATION DISTRICT and MOUNTAIN STATE5 TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH
COMPANY, d/b/a_MOUNTAIN BELL, a Colorado corporation
(collectively, "Easement Users").
WHEREAS, a certain ten (10) foot utility easement over the
northerly ten feet of Tract a(and adjacent to the northerly
property line of Tract a), Vail Village First Filing, Vail,
Colorado, was created by VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC. in the original
Vail Village First Filing Plat, filed under Reception Number
96382 at Pages 49 and 50 in the Plat Book of Eagle County,
Colorado, allowing Easement User the use of such easement for the
construction, maintenance and reconstruction of sewerage, water,
gas, electric and telephone transmission facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the location of a portion of such utility easement
was modified by document recorded August 12, 1974 in Book 236 at
Page 22 of the real property records of Eagle County, Colorado.
Suc.h utility easement as relocated is hereinafter referred to as
the "Utility Easement"; and,
WHEREAS, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO is the assignee
of, or successor in interest to, GAS FACILITIES, INC., which
obtained the right to use the Utility Easement by an instrument
recorded July 24, 1964, in Book 183, at Page 157 in the records
of Eagle County, Colorado; and, ,
WHEREAS, the Utility Easement is not presently being used
and the Easement User has no present intention of using such
Easement; and
WHEREAS, a portion of Owner's building, the Sitzmark Lodge,
is now located on a portion of the Utility Easement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
f ' . .
l. Easen:ent User, on behalf or itself, its successors and
assigns, by this instruiu~nr_ hereby torever abandons, vacates,
releases, •and cercninates its right to the- Utility Easement.
Easement C.'L;,2r 11E,r.eby cor.v,:~ys all its right, title and interest in
and to UtiliL;• 1:-i:.uinunL vacated above, to Owner.
2. This Vacati.on and Abandonment shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit oi ttie successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO,
as Successor to, and/or Assignee
of, GAS FACILITIES, INC., a
Colorado
ATTES'I' :
EY:
HOI.Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, a
Colorado nonprofit corporation
AT'1'F.ST :
~ ~W~,j ' f C
Y
VAIL WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
ATTEST: BY: .
MOUNTFiIN STATES TELEPliONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY, d/b/a MOUNTAIN
l3ELL, a Colorado corporation
ATTEST :
B Y :
2
1. Easement User, on behalf of itself, its successors and
assigns, by this instrument hereby forever abandons, vacates,
releases, and terminates its right to the Utility Easement.
Easement User hereby conveys all its right, title and interest in
and to Utility Easement vacated above, to Owner.
2. This Vacation and Abandonment shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
PUBLIC SERVIGE COMPANY OF COLORADO,
as Successor to, and/or Assignee
of, GAS FACILITIES, INC., a
Colorado
ATTEST:
BY:
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, a
Colorado nonprofit corporation
ATTEST:
BY:
UPPER EAGLE VALLEY CONSOLIDATED
SANITATION DISTRICT
ATTEST:
~
sY : , ?/~C~-~.~z~ C?,~~ ~,cL-. S-2 8"-8
~
MOUrITAIN STATES TELEP}iONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY, c:/h/a MOUNTAIN
BELL, a Coiorado corporation
ATTEST : 4
/ . ~ >
BY : ~ ~ ,•,+-~t -i.E.~' ; . ~ -C~,v-L~~~~
2
~
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement
was acknowledged before me this day of , 1987, by
as o Pu ic Service
Company o Co ora o, as Successor to, an /or Assignee of, GAS
FACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Pu ic
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement
was acknowledged before me this day of , 1987, by
as o Ho y Cross Electric
Association, a Co ora o nonprofit corporatian.
. Witness my hand and official sea1.
My commission expires:
Notary Pu ic
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement
was acknowledged before me this L;y day of /.~L1.,_.{- , 1987, by
as (-,j' /:~TA . of UPPER EAGLE VALLEY
'CONSOLIDATED SANITATION DISTRICT •
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: y
.
otary Pu ic
- ~ _
- - ` ~
-
' - - 3
STATE OF COLORADO ~ Ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE ) -
The foregoing Vacation and Abanaanmoft of Existing 1987meby
was acknowledged before me thas y o pu ic Service
Company o Co ora o, as Successor to, an /or Assignee of, GAS
FACILITIES, INC., a Colorado corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal. ~
My commission exgires:
Notary Pu ic
STATE OF COLORADO ~ ss.
COUNTY OF &A=E ~
The foregoing Vacation and Aba~donment o xisting i98?meby
a~s ackn wle ed before me thas _ ~ry~,,f o oly Cross Electric
Jssociation,- Co ora o nonpro it corporati ,
Witr.ess my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:-~~
~l~ \ !d.f-
No tary p i 'v
STATE OF COLORADO ~ ss. ~
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abanaanmeft of Existing i98?meby
was acknowledged before me thas y oo Vail Water and
Sanitation District.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary u ic
3
. ;
STATE OF COLOFZADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
Ttie fore.going Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement
wa cktiowledged before me this ~ day of (Yla , 1987, by
as o% -o Mo ntain States
Te~ one and Telegraph Company,~ a Mountain Bell, a Colorado
corporation.
Wit-ness my hand and official seal.
`My comn?ission expires :
" Notar ' u 1 ' 7~
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
THE SITZr1AKK AT VAIL, INC., a
Colorado corporation ATTEST : BY :
STATE OF COLGRADO ) ) ss.
COUrJTY OF EAGLE )
The foregoing Vacation and Abandonment of Existing Easement
-wa.s acknow~edged betore me thi 2e' day of o , 1987, by
as o Th Sitzmark at
~Vai?, Inc.., a Colorado corporation.
" Witness my hand and official sEal.
My commission expires :
, - - ~
Notary ic S. ~
4
~
• 1'r
~
ll ~~~~1
cK
y 9`~
I: (
4) . ~
/
Lodge
May 28, 1987
Concerning the easement-' on the northwest corner of the Sitzmark
Lodge property. The -J'«b /i C.SPk-2?1e e~v fri~~q ~t: c~ is in
the proce_ss of executing ali abatement of this easemnt and they
have no problem with thc Sitzmark building on it.
~
,
Year Around Resorl Lodging
183 Gore Creek Dnve • Vail, Colorado 81657 •(303) 476-5001 r'a;L
~
ALTA LOAN POLICV-Modlfied 10/73 ORDER N0. : 2306-VC2 S C H E D U L E B
PART I o
Policy No.:
This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims or easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a
correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the '
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,
imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Taxes for t.he year 1986 and th.Y>>-c=af t,t2r , and anl special assessment
or chargzs riot yet certi.f ied tv lt-LP vif ice bf the County Trra slirer.
6. Restrictians which d<~ not contai.n .-t f,:,r i extuc of reverter
clause, but; omit.l.,jng iE any, Lase.d on r,3ce,
color, religiori, or nzzti.or,al origlfir as coni:ained in innt rufnerit
recorded August 10, 1962, in Fook 174 at. Pa(ge 179.
7. Partial Vacatian and Abandonment ot" Easemetlt and grant
of new easement between '1'tie Sitzmark wtt Vail, nc., a Coloradt.) Diko
Corporai;iori and :.;it.zmark Properi:iES, -i. Cc~ .rac , LimiLed o
~
Partnership arid 1-ialy Cross F1ecLric a Mv~ini~~in
States Telephone arid Telegrapti +_or: -iny ~~it,~a f~unt.ain bell,
Pt.tblic Ser~ ic~ CcrmF~an~ F'zzci l i ieR, Inc. , V~lil
Water anci Sanitat.iori Dis zct, ''Ctil 7Inc., a
Colorado corpor.-stion, an Lhe Tr_ 1 c, V,iil, H Plunicipal
corporatiori re03331277 Jul 1, l~~y1 i ?3'~ at Eage 33E3 a5
Receptian No. an(l -erar.(' 2d Aucj~~:;t 1i:, 1974 ir? I3ook 23b
at Page 22 as ori rSu. 51'~~31.
8. Conveparsce of £.aGement i:,etwr•en `,.riil Associate5, Inc. , a.
Colorado Ce,rFine-at.zon, Sii:zmHrk at Vail, l:ric., a Colorado
corporation, aitzmark I'rope~-tics, a(,r_,lacado Limited
PartnerstYip ar?d Holy Croas Elect.rlc A.ss,~ciat.;ion, Inc.,
e cooperative corE>orritic>n recarded Nh~v-rnber 16, 1982 in I~uvk
348 at Page 839 as Rereption CJo. '24`-:30.
9. Terms, conditions, resl;rictian and stipulal;ions as cor?tainf,d
in anp existing subleaseg arid. terjfincleh.
Exceptions Numbered are hereby omitted.
, 1 thru 4
1823
,20M6-94i ~ Page3 S'I`E`ti'ART TITLE
• ' OIIARANT7 COllIPAXY
~#1,?,1981-Filed for Record: Aug.12,1974 At 1 P M 236/22 i.
:s • . . - . • } . ' . . . ' , .
• ~ • '
PARTIAL VACATION AIdD AB.".NDONMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENT
and •
GRANT . OF NEW EASE:Ii,NT
i .
i THIS INSTRUMENT is made this 28th day of June ,1974, .
by and between T11E SITZKARK AT VAIL, INC., a Colorado corporatian,
. and SITZMARK PROPEI2TtES, a Colorado Limited Partnership,
• (hereinafter "Owners"), and tiOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, '
MOUNTAIN STATES TLLEPI-iOivE AND TELEGi~.nPH COMPA\Y, d/b/a
MOUNTAIN BELL, PUVLIC SE-VICE C0:4PANY OF COLORADO (for itself ana as assignee of, or successor in interest to, GAS FACILITIES,
, IiJC.), and the V;1IL WATER AND SANITATIOiV DISTRICT, (hereinafter
collectively "Easement Users"), and V11IL ASSOCIATES, INC._, a Colorado ?
, corporation, and the TOLJN OF VAIL, a Dlunicipal corporation,
WHEREAS, a certain ten (10) foot easement over the
northerly ten (10) feet of Tract a, Vail Village First Filing,
Vail, Colorado, was created uy V71IL ASSOCIIITES, INC. in the oriqinal
. Vail Village First Tiling Plat, filed under Reception Number 96382
at Pages 49 and SO in the Plat IIook of Eagle County, Colorado,
allowing Easement Users the use of such easement for the construction,
maintenance and reconstruction of sewerage, water, gas, electric
and telephone transmission facilities, (hereinafter the "Utility
Easement"); and,
G]HEREAS, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO is the assignee
of, or successor in interest to, GAS FACILITIES, INC., which
obtained the right to use the Utility Easement by an instrument
recorded July 24, 1964, in Book 183, at Page 157 in the records of
, Eagle County, Colorado; and,
WfIEREAS, the Utility Lasement is not presently being usecl
and the Easement Users have no present intention of using such
Easement; and,
WfIEREAS, a portion of Owners' building, the Sitzmark Lodge,
located on tne property described on Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein, is located on a portion of the Utility
Easement as located on Owners' land; and,
LqfIEREAS, VAIL ASSOCIATES, ItiC., the original Grantor of such
Easement, desires to grant a utility easement on its property which
adjoins that of Owners to permit the Utility Easement to pass .
around the corner of Owners' building; and,
• tti'TL;ERc,AS, VAIL ASSOCIATES, by Lease recorded December 8, 1971,
• in Book 222 at Page 518 in the records of Eagle County, Colorado,
leased to the TOWN OF VAIL certain real property including that over
which the new easement will be located,
NOW, THEREI'ORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
. contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived and othar
good ana valuable consideration, tne parties hereto hereby covenant
and agree as follows:
1. Easement Users and VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., on behalf of
. themselves, their successors and assigns, by this instrument hereby
forever abandon, vacate, release and terminate that portion of the
Utility Easement, as described above, on which certain improvements
have been built, which improvements are known as The Sitzmark Lodge
and located on the real property described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein; L•'asement Users hereby cor.vey all
their right, title and interest in and to that portion of the
Utility Easement vacated above, to Owners.
2. VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., as owner of the following described
property, hereby grants a ten (10) foot utility easement to and
for the use of the present and future owners of Blocks, Lots and
Tracts in the Vail Village rirst Filing for the construction, ,
maintenance and reconstruction oL sewerage, caater, gas, electric
and telephone transmission facilities, as follows:
, ! ~ ~
. .
. ' , ~ '
. y , , • .
, . i • • ,
u
~
p,n easement 10.00 feet in width, located in Tract I?
Vail Village First I'iling, and being adjacent to a .+1
~ part of the Westerly and Northerly sides of a building
in a part of Tract a, nlock 5-I3, Vail Village First i
,
Filing, County of Eayle, State of Colorado, more
particularly described as follows: . Cmmencing at the Northwest corner of said Tract a; I
• 'I
ence N.66°18'00"E. and along the Northerly line
innin ~
f said Tract a 69.46 13e04tfeete tpoint henceoS.86°21'lOg,
t~ence N.03°38'S0"L.,
? ~ line of said Tract a; thence
5.21 feet to the North~.r1y 1 line 28.38 feet +
~.66°lg' pp"~•7, and along gaid I~orthergy ft, more ~
to the point of neginnin • containin 162 sq•
or less.
3, By way of clarification and further description, ;
Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated here~hedencroachinq the location of the existing UtilityEsementtrouting the I
Sitzmark Lodgc, and tlie new u~.ilit, I
easement around the northwest corner of the building.
i
q, This Vacation and Grant shall be binding artiesnheretoe o
the benefit of the successors and assigns of the p
THE SITZMARK AT VAIL, INC.
A Colorado Corporation
A~~e /~~i~-`„ ~~•1,.?,! .
' By
i, _ ~ ~ '
e; '~"~i SITZMARK PROPERTIES
. • ;,.i.::.~,~~ ~ „ Colorado Limited Partnership
B
~ , y-p`--v General Partner ;
„
~(G^ .
IiOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCZATZON ~
A Colorado rlonprof it Corporation , i
• Attest: . ' By c~: C <<
. . , ~ / .
A10UNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE.-.AiqA•..••.•.
.P1CJU~lT~1Yt~''•~~~L : .
: ~ * 3 •
" TELEGRAPH COMPANY, d/b/4
A Colorado Corpora on : ~ r ;
/ '
11•
• ' • I ~ \1v~.~.Q"~-~rr'i ti 1 ` • ' I'
_
Attest:
By
Presi ent %
p(JBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF~, tO , RADO'~` i
Assistant S~ cretary
K_ APPROVED FOR EXCCU f iGy as Successor to, and/or AsSi.gnee of, ;
.
A Colorado~'
•.INC
YANS, KELLY ~ STA'`'SrIELD GAS FACILITIES,
, ISi:
Corporati n
. ~ ' ~ , , 0 r ,
T ? ~ r / / ~;l • J /~i ; t_j 'AIt est~
: By l%' - c'>
. ~ ' , V I JATER AND ANITATION ICT~~'~ i
, ~lf.'.~vLaly
. . _
31
~ , 1 / • , / ~ ~ , .
B
Attes
l , y
, ,
SSOCIATES, INC. .j
VAIL A ~l, •
'
A Colo ado Corporati : . `
By
~.r"~--~--- . '
THE TOWN OF VAIL ~ ~
~'L
By
. . ' 1 ~ • 1
. • , ~
• I. ,...~,J -2_
- i
. .
, , • '
. . . ' . ' • ~ : . , . . "
~ .
t• ~r • STATE OF COLORADO ~ ss. •
COUNTY Or' ) ' •
1 1'1' ''~'he f.oregoing was dt y a kn~wledvd/ before me this
. L • y .
~ ~"~i•r~ as President
i %
da`~of•..~"n~ 19 4by
~ as Secretary o THE SI,TZM Ri~ T
. L,. ZNC. , a Colorado corporation, and by
PROPE ~ ~
`-4~~a C'y~qpral Partner of SITZh1ARK RTIE S, a Co lora do Li i t e d
$ ip. Wi *11ess my hand and officia l sea l, r tiy commissio n
exp~ ~es .~cJ r27 77J /
s~,•.:'• G - ~
. p,-
,,,,,,,,,0
Notary Public
'ST~TE or• coLOrUAno )
-'cow'rY or L~~ct_c ~ SS . .
,.,..:,...r~---- .
: 1. ?
; 4;• `Uti •~'he foreyoing was duly ackr.owledged before me this 1 th
.,d~~y of;- June, 1974, by Stanley Natal as President
Cn c~zor-pe W. Thurston as Secretary of tIOLY CROSS
VELEC"i'1~"`C ASSOCIA`i'ION. Wic.ness my hand and of f icial seal. My
,.cC'sI sion expires April 12, 1977
F~ f_ •
No ar Public
STATE OF COLORADO ) Ei
COUN`PY OL•' ~•,r,~~'n,,_~j ss. w `
. r--~r~ ~ ;
`~:..,....,,;r.: .
•,The foregoing was duly ack»owlcdged before me this co
Ar„ . ) • ~
1974, by , x-~~• as President j
,•,_i as C Secretary of MOUNTAIN
•a''n•' ~.~'~,~r S• TELEPHON AND TELEGRIIPH COMPANY, d/b/a MOUNTAIN BELL. cl ~A4~5ies,? my hand and official seal. My commission expires
. r'~• - r 1 ~ ~G• /
, ~ . C! i' • / \ _/v`'.~S ~ f[•J F
otary Public
a~ O
•`i ~ ~
STA E OF COLORIIDO ss. 4
COUNTY OF
`%0jiluu,,;
l.l; !,i''~.. The foregoing was duly acknowledged before me this ~
~
d'ay,o,f March, 1974, by as v'sce President
SecretarY of PUBLIC
• • : (a r~,nd•.. a s
.,.SERV.ICi C0MPANY OP COLOi2AD0, as Successor to, and/or Assignee
~G~~S F1ICZLITIES, IvC. witness my hand and official seal.
• LJ '~~ly,.-commission expires
. ~~1.•'~`• ..~~,v,\
tary P b c
STATE OF COLORADO
, COUNTY OF ss. .
. ' , . . .
' The foregoing was duly acknowledged before me this
;,'•'~'~ay,'of 1974, by
, .\~~d_ ~ . • , as Sec~etary of VAIL
~
SANTTATION UISTRICT. Witness my hand and offiCial .
commission expires
n
y~`~•~'-.~.`1•-~./\.1W{~.//.`~ r
• • Notary~ Public
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF S S.
T e foregoing was, duly acknowledqe'd.'/b'ef•ore.me this 'A
President
day pf 1974' by`~,,~.,\. ...,~s ,
and ~ as ~.-.,Secx.qtary of VAIL
ASSOCIA'lES, INC. Wi.tness my liand: a~i. c~;•~a;c~a~ L:seal. My
commiss ion expires • ' = ~
~ ..J• 7,,~; )n.
• .
'Nn.'EarX, Yublic•~
-3-
• Y
. . • + . • . , 't.~ ,y ~ .
' STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss. • . •
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
The ~oregoing was duly acknowledged,before me this ,
day of ~I~c~?~? , 1974, by - : , : . : ~l ~ ~_~c.;; ~.'.~c, i?~ i ^'~U~1~ ~i1~cz.,~..~t.G~,~'•
•
oe Town of Vail, a municipal;corp -oratT on. Witness my
' t.and and official seal. My commission expires '2o
.
~Notary u ic .
.
. . .
~ .
I ,
~
i
1 w
~
~
~
f .
I
~
' I
, 4 - ; -
4
. . . - -
, :t' r' _
•4
• ~
• , r, , ' ~i
• . ; ~.i:,,• ~i ~
.
EXFII3IT f1
, • :~i. ,:t .
• • ~ ' ~•i! ~
~ .
loc'r: 5-I3 in VAIL VILLAGL, FIRST FILING
.`A part of Lot a in B
' in the County of L•'agle in the State of Colorado, more
particularly descriaeci as follo%'-'s:
Commencing at the r:orthwesL corner of said Lot a, thence
N 66°18' 0011 E along thc D:ortherly li;-,-.: of said Lot a.
thence continuing
65.45 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
along the aforesaid course 46.00 feet; thence S 85°15'52" E
126.64 feet; thence S 01°04'05" E 106.00 feet to a pthencef
intersectioil witii line
cusaid rve; Lthence on an
S 79°17'00" W 88.34 f '~..et to a point o
• angle to the right ot 95022'98" and alor.g a curvE to the right
having a radius of 65.00 feet a;zd a c<:ntral angle of. 16°03'12",
an are distance oL• 18.21 feet to apoir,t; thence N 88°11'00" W
55.50 feet; thence N 17°00'00° W 98.80 feet to the true point
of beginning.
'
I
i . .
~
~ .
I • • '
I
~
~
~ .
^ I . , . .
, I
. _ _ ^1 .I Y ' . • .
;i . ~ ?V. '~/.It•/~/ • I • . • I •
. ~ . - ( ~ZS ~ ~QLY U , • .
~UE :POINT ' ~ ' p ~~,~~T~' ` EASfMfNT
. . OF gtGINNING-~ ~ /p`6wp0 ((IiGITI' . • , f ~ ~
/0 . . . " •
y~ oo~
. • . . . .
~ ~ ~ • t;'•,! 7.~M (s I ~ ,y„ r ~ ~ . . . . ~ . ~ ~
G5 45' . ~ . ~ i . ~ 18.~' ' . ~ ~ . j ' ' ~ ,
. 'I ~ • ~ . . • ' '_L- , r- J'c,r, . ~ . I ' •
. ~ • ~ , , ~r . i . ti . • . . 5 e , ; •
~ COQ-TRAC 7 0 ~ ?
/S,
~LOCK .5- g ' . ~ : ~ ~ ~ 6. 6 S~. . . •+r/
I.,~.. • . . . ~I . . . ' ~ v// ~ ' . ~ I
~ ~ ~ . . : • . . . , `~M ~ . . . '
• : ~5• . . . • , . , a , . • .
I . ~PROPO~ED' , QoAp
,Q.o. w. ~ •..t.~~ . TqiN~N~ o . . H
. I~; . ' . : : 0 , 70 .0
~ ~ • 952 5~ F~ . ti ~ H
- ; . . . ' . C. ~ • , 408 qc Q . . ~ ~
, . • p ~ ~ . . , e5 ' W
I;;;;;..:,~;~. ` ' • ~ . . . .
f' ~ . , . . • :?U O
~
~ • . 'i ~ . ~ . ~ ~ , r N n ° ^ ~ ~:r~ - . - . .
~ ~ / . ~ , ~ . ~ ' ~ . I . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ • . ~ n~ ~ , . 1 I ~~°o .
Ii ~ ~ • . . . ~ Z ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ , ' , ~
. . . . . ~ ' ~ . . ~ i . • . .
. ~ . , • . . . , e~• ~ jn. .
;1Y . .
~ . , ~ . • , A y ; • ' . . . • . vry ~ O O
I ~ ~ ' 1 r• ~ 1 ' . ~ . . ' ' , h, ` O ` ' , . .
`r . . .;I '1 4'.. ' ~ / a ' .
N
;,.",~t~``. ' . • ' ~ n • . a,. ' • ~ : ' ~ ,
~t 1 ~ . . : . i~ . : : ' ~ • . . .
. . • ~ • .Q, 4°.1 ' 26'.
' ' ~ • • ~ 13 .OD'.. 1,0 ~ , • ,
, ~ • ~ • • ~ 10 26,.... • ' ~adry1 . , . .
t ;I;..,' ; . • : ~ `vy `4 ' • ~ ~ ti ' , , ,
. . . • • U'^'~~D' ..3G.ca- . ~ ~ ~ • ~ . .
. :i: ~ • i•,~ . , ~,i: ' . . . a ~f24.
• •~i • • . . . . . S 74o74
' . . •
1' . 1 ~ - . . . .
. . . , . . ;.G. , , K , ~ u~ , . . . _
F. ~ • .
131381
: .
:y ~ . . . • . ' . !i
I
~ y
Ir STATE OF COtORADO - ~ '
~ EP,GLE COUNTY } ss, . ,
I "zreby cer*ify 'h3; !hi; ins'rumen`.
V,zs f.e.f io`.,,eccrd i„ r, o'fi\e th
af(,j :C.l~`-;.
. . . ~ ,
.
~Olii: f C:Pr', • i?; i~C:0f~2f
~ L
,
~ Ccpuh-j
Fee g._.__.. ~ .
~
, . i
.y ~
~ • ' . , i
l
~ .
, - ~ " .
~ : " ~ • - . . . . . , ~ ~ . ~
. '
. ~ ' . . . ~ .I . .
~ " .
. , ~ t,~ , , . .
. ~ . -
T I~A C T I
Utility Eatement l recarded io 8ook 235 : .
• ; al Paqe 336)
. ) 5 85015'52" E ~
s eeazi'io" e 25.21 ' 0,6 i ~
W
u~i-
o M ' ~o 't{ , aza
o - N6 , p`k .
N
2,?~ ~ 571
~ True Palnt of I i 6
BeqinninqA~ ~ ,8'
02
I ' 13 2'
Ir CO
. ' . _ , ~
6yA ;rf,t.Y; f
~ ~ ' . 1 ~.I~' ~ j l i ~ .
13.5' ~ .
~ 0 6. I
0 n
~ O. I ~ {
i ~t s.3r 01"- vi
Nw CorMr Lot o, Biott 5•8 , O \i3'xi • Five Siary Slucco Buiidinq
3'
L 14.7'
~ , I Z
. . , . i .
• ' . . . , , . F .R' ~ ~ . ~ . ~ .
~ • ' O ; •
~ F ~ • .
~1 , , . . - . ~ . . . . ~ ,I_ -`...s,~,•i.~~ _ - _ ,
, 2
22.4' ~ . .
Crnar Goraqe
Enlry o
-
~ •nl 16.5 6.3'
~ i6.S' Nd. }
.
~
; • j` 3 Qi
~ , , ' Q
t
( EA9t/wESr 9un.niNr,