The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988-05-24 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session~~. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 2:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Discussion of a .request to amend a Pedestrian Easement at the Concert Hall Plaza 2. Discussion of Expansion Concept for Village Information Center 3. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 4. Information Update 4. Other VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 1. Discussion of a request to amend a pedestrian easement at Rick Pylman the Concert Hall Plaza Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny the requested easement. - Background Rationale: The existing pedestrian easement currently bisects the Lionshead Bar and Grill dining deck. To satisfy liquor code, the proposal would locate the dining area adjacent to the restaurant and reroute the pedestrian circulation around the deck. This proposal is to be reviewed by the PEC on 5/23. See enclosed drawing. Staff Recommendation: Approve the amendment as proposed. 2:20 2. Discussion of Expansion Concept for Village Information Ron Phillips Center Jim Morter Action Requested of Council: Review drawings and cost estimates. Modify or approve going on to next steps of DRB review and construction. Background Rationale: Jim Morter has done some conceptual drawings for expansion and modification of the existing Village information booth as recommended by the Marketing Committee. The drawings cost estimates and staff recommendation will be presented at the Work Session. 3:05 3. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Peter Patten 3:15 4. Information Update 3:20 5. Other Ni I, !!~R 1. YAlL/ LKwBNE47~ TWPO FlLINB ~= `~'~, ~...~., ~ ~ _. ,.., ~...., ~. ,.., LEGAL 4 f -~~ --_ ~ .___._~.. _...____ - N I ! --__. ~.____-_- a ~ -_.. / .... ~ / ~,.~, n...,, ,i" "~ e•~rx~r' ~~ti ____~_____________________ _____ o m:.' ~~. ,,.~ . ~,~,.°~~ ~ .~„Mw ,.,~. w,r:aJ \o ~C --- 1 ~ ~~' II :s A ' ~ f t-1 ~ Y C o g °.Y ~ ,~ _ ,~~' Sr ~-- i ~.,. su•vca . ~ ~~~ / LO? B -RUE POINT OF BEGINNING r__ 8.00 ROOF ,~.a~ OVERHANG-'I 1~ Y yM 0 y ~~. 0 / Q / 0 / ~~. I~~ ~I ~~( ~l ~~~ ii I~ - illy 1 ~ ~.D~ AaeS I ° VIClNJTY MAP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 ~ Squore Feet / i ~ N.r.s. ~ ~}/~/~ 1 N 85° I II E 20121 ~ ~ LEGAL OESCAIPT[ON: JJ W i A part of Concert Hall Plaza Condominiums, T°wn of Yail, Eagle County, 15 PEDESTRIAN CDNLR E ~ `~ ~ Colorado, and heing more particularly described as f°llows: EASEMENT /DECK ~ 2 Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Concert Rall Plaza Cond°mi- 00 feet to thence S 86°53'10" W 8 81 feet 5 04°21'00" E 0 i h ~ry /B R ~ . ; . ence n ums; t 2 feet to the Northeast 5 86°53'10" W 1 h % (UNITS ELOW) lO m . ence the True Point of Beginning; t f said Concert Hall Plaza; thence S 26°35'12" W fl f th _ '7 ~ I ~ e upper oor o corner o 39.00 feet; thence N 86°33'00" E 20.12 feet; thence N 04°27'00" W 33.73 feet ° J t~ ~ 009 acres (370 square feet). containing 0 innin e Paint of Be the Tr t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ _ lV o . g, g u o The East line of the Plat of said Concert Nall Plaza Condominiums is considered y I ~ to bear 5 04°27'00" E, ii ~ Q -~--- m SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ~0.3~DECH OVERHANG ~ I, L1°yd 'W. Powers, being a duly Registered Land Surveyor in the State °f Colorado, da hereby certify that this Legal Description as shown hereen is correct to the best of mry know- ledge and belief. ~~ 7 ~ /9 I/ ~ I p . I 11 I IJJATLti ~ l~('C~. ~ Lloyd Powers, R.L.S. 13901 ~ s 1 1 W 1 O `~ - kt „° y NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence ~ A ~ ~ `~' any legal action based upon any defect in this survey I:a,,t1~ ~~~ ' (~ ° ti ~ > within six years after you first discover such defect. ° ~ y~ v, N In no event, may any action based upon any defect in `-- ~- '. ;.,- O _ this survey be commenced more than ten years from the ~ date of the certification shown hereon. • TR T 78 oat eensnws LEGAL DESCRIPTION ocvwweo erg ~.w.e ' vrt°,KCT xa w v~1o~ 1420 v4nICE S EE P.QEIOX 9 coLae,exo Inter-Mountain LAKEN~OOO caaebz,7 N CONCERT NALL PLAZA CONDOMJNJUM t~ 6/16/87 . , nvo 1303123?-0,38 laoals4e•eo~s LEngineeringua , VAlL LIONSMFAD FOURTH fILJNG LOT I ° "~ L.w.P I°=)ol . , , , TOWN Of VAIL, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO ~„ „~ '"`~ "'' - of ~ Planning and Environmental Commission May 23, 1988 1:45 PM Site Visits 3:00 PM Public Hearing 1. Approval of minutes of April 25, 1988. 2. A request for a conditional use permit in order to modify an existing outdoor dining deck at the Concert Hall Plaza Building. Applicant: Lionshead Bar and Grill 3. A request for a conditional use permit in order to construct a chairlift on Tract A, Vail Village 6th Filing, Tract B, Vail Lionshead 2nd Filing, and an unplatted parcel, all zoned Agriculture/Open Space. Applicant: Vail Associates 4. A request for a side setback variance in order to construct an addition to unit #6, Cottonwood Townhomes. Applicant: Gail Molloy 5. A request for a minor amendment to Special Development District No. 21, Vail Gateway. Applicant: Palmer Development 6. A request for a side setback variance in order to add a garage and addition to a residence at Lot 5, Block 1, Bighorn 5th Addition. Applicant: Peter Gombrich TM ~~,'>, ~ _ ,~~ ~ r !~ ~~ tow~o uai ~{ ~~ 75 south frontage road ~~~ ~ ^ ^ A veil, coiorado 81&57 (/,wu(/„) (303)476-7000 office of the town manager May 19, 1988 Mr. R. P. Moston Colorado Department of Highways P. 0. Box 2107 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502-2107 Dear. Bob: Thank you for your letter concerning the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which has been approved by the Federal Highway Administration. The Town of Vail concurs in the announcement of public availability and completing the final steps for the environmental clearance process. Since a y, Rondall U. Phill ps Town Manager RUP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council ~.EC'~ tv1AY 1 ~ 1988 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 222 South Sixth Street, P.O. Box 2107 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502-2107 (303)248-7208 Mr. Ron Phillips Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Ron: May 16, 1988 ,` ~P~~ENT -oFg Cy N. ~. o `i 1~~ O ~ OQP r~~ The Colorado Division of Highways is in the process of debudgeting the federal aid funds originally earmarked for construction of the ramps and signals at Vail. These funds will be used at another I-70 location within our district. Although we have no specific plans or funds at this time, we feel that it is important to conclude the Environmental Assessment/Access Approval process to support any future decision to construct the "V.A. Shop" ramps or to acquire the necessary right of way. The. Federal Highway Administration has reviewed and approved the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and we are ready to announce its public availability. This is the final step in the environmental clearance process and completing it would allow right of way acquisition by CDOH (or the Town) and construction with federal aid funds if the project were rebudgeted in the future. We therefore request your concurrence in our issuance of the FONSI to conclude the environmental assessment process. Very truly yours, RDP:rb cc: Golden Clevenger Berry Abbott R. P. Moston District Engineer lows of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 TO: Ron Phillips (`!~ FROM: Susan Scanl n DATE: May 17, 1988 SUBJECT: Drainage Pollution of Gore Creek office of community development Your memo, dated May 11, 1988, to Tom Braun was passed along to me. The issue of non-point source pollution has been raised before, especially as it regards the run-off from area parking lots. We will be looking into completing an inventory of area parking lots; both surface and structured, to determine if any means are currently in use to filter run-off. There are various control strategies which can be employed both on surface lots and structured parking. Once our offices have returned to some degree of normality I will do some further research using materials I know I have somewhere. We will attempt to get. this information to you in the not too distant future so that you may pass it along to Council. TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Charlie Wick Steve Thompson~f May 18, 1988 VMRD Board Meeting 5f 16/88 At the April 14, 1988 Board meeting staff were instructed to go ahead and pay the Town the balance of the 1987 management fee with interest and to pay for five (5) months of the 1988 management fee at the next meeting. However, due to the approval of the golf course irrigation project at the May 16, 1988 meeting, a motion was made to borrow money from the Town by not paying the 1988 management fee monthly, but when their cash position .improved in June or July 1988. The 1987 management fee of $50,225 was paid in two installments, one on January 18, 1988 for $25,000 and on May 16, 1988 for $25,225 plus $510 in interest. The Board approved borrowing money from the Town on January 14, 1988 by not paying the 1987 management fee until they could do so. ~~ 1~'~~ /~.., ~ ~'~ ~ a .~ r~ ~ o p Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments For the Month Ending April 30, 1988 Money Market Accounts (see page 1) Com<ncrcial Banks Colorado Investment Pools Money Market Mutual Fund Total Funds For Reserve Operating Funds ------------------- Balances Percentage Percentage 4/30/88 of Total Allowed -------------------------------- S168,186 $160,495 $328,681 3.23$ 100 $4,785,655 $4,785,655 46.99$ 50$ 5224,199 $229,194 2.20$ 50$ ----------------------------------- ------ $5,178,035 $160,995 S5,338,530 52.42$ Commercial Savings ~ Banks Loans Certificates of Deposit (see page -- 2) ---------- - Eagle County Institutions $210,987 $210,987 Other Colorado Institutions $200,000 .$90,000 S290,000 National Institutions $396,000 $683,000 $1,079,000 Total $806,987 $773,000 51,579,987 Percentage of Portfolio in Savings ~ Loans U.S. Government Securities (see page 3) Treasury Notes GNMA's U.S. Savings Bonds Total Total Portfolio Maturity Schedule .Maturing Within 12 Months Maturing Within 24 Months _ Maturing After 24 Months $210,987 2.07 $290,000 2.858 $1,079,000 10.59$ S1,579,987 15.51$ 100$ 7.59 15$ 51,190,000 $1,855,000 $3,045,000 29.90$ 100$ $205,948 $205,948 2.02$ 100$ 515,000 $15,000 0.15$ 100$ ----------------------------------- ------ $1,410,948 S1,855,000 $3,265,948 32.07$ $8,168,970 $2,015,995 $10,189,465 100.00$ $8,996,530 87.89$ $677,000 6.658 5560,935 ---- 5.51$ --------- $10,189,465 ------- 100.00$ Money Market Accounts as of April 30, 1988 --------For the Month of April-------- Account Institution Interest Balances Type of Accounts High ------------------------- ------------ Low ---------- Average --------- Received ---------- 4/30/88 -------------- First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 6.305$ 5.9398 6.130$ $3,548 Balance 51,705,595 S304,971 5651,687 $75,798 First Bank of Vail - Municipal Court Interest 6.3058 5.9398 6.1308 5453 Balance ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- --------- ------- - $92,388 First Bank of Vail - Insurance Interest 6.3058 5.9398 6.1308 5819 Balance ____________ __________ _________ 5160,495 Colorado Trust (Investment Pool) Interest 6.358 Balance 517,969 59,785,655 Merrill Lynch (Money Market Fund) Interest 5,89$ Balance 51,079 $224,194 ------------------------ 523,868 $5,338,530 Page 1 05/13/88 SJT INVMM809 - Certificates of Deposit as of April 30, 1988 Bank Name, Location Days to Market Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Maturity Value Ins Coupon Yield Date Date --------------------- at Purchase N,aturity Value 4/30/88 ----------------- lst American Bank & Trust, Lake Worth FL ------------ --------- ------------- ---------- FDIC 7.300$ 7.300$ 28-Apr-88 27-Jul-88 90 88 $98,000 Texas Banc Savings Assoc, Conroe Texas FSLIC 7.250$ 7.250$ 28-Apr-88 27-Jul-88 90 88 $98,000 American Savings d Loan, Stockon CA FSLIC 7.300$ 7.425 28-Apr-88 27-Jul-88 90 88 $98,000 _ Capital City Savings Assoc, Austin, Texas FSLIC 7.250$ 7.250$ 28-Apr-88 26-Auq-88 120 118 $98,000 United Savings Bank, Vienna, VA FSLIC 7.250 7.2501 27-Apr-88 25-Aug.-88 120 117 $99,000 First Bank of Gladstone, Missouri FDIC 7.750 7.750$ 30-Oct-87 O1-Jun-88 215 62 $99,000 Albuquerque Federal Savings and Loan FSLIC 7.550$ 7.550$ 29-Oct-86 11-Jul-88 621 102 $53,000 Perpetual American Federal Savings and Loan, Mclain Virginia FSLIC 12.650$ 5.864$ 24-Oct-86 05-Sep-88 682 158 $62,000 $b3,097 12.700$ 7.595$ 24-Oct-86 12-Sep-88 689 165 530,000 $30,592 Pacific Federal Savings and Loan; Seattle FSLIC 9.600$ 7.400 29-Oct-86 12-Sep-88 689 165 $55,000 $55,401 First American Bank,. Boston Mass FDIC 8.000$ 8.000$ 12-Nov-87 12-Nov-90 1096 956 $99,000 Suffield Savings Bank, Suffield Connecticut FDIC 7.750$ 7.750$ 30-Oct-87 O1-Jun-88 215 62 $100,000 First Federal Savings and Loan, Mich FSLIC 11.600$ 7.568$ 24-Oct-86 05-Oct-88 712 188 $90,000 $91,436 Columbia Federal Savings and Loan, Denver Co FSLIC 11.800$ 6.727$ 24-Oct-86 19-Dec-88 782 258 $90,000 $92,067 Bank of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Co FDIC 8.000$ 8.000$ 23-Oct-87 31-May-88 221 61 $100,000 Rio Blanco State Bank, Rangely Co FDIC 7.750$ 7.750 03-Aug-87 02-Auq-88 365 124 $100,000 Page 2 Con't Vail National Bank FDIC 7.000 7.000$ 04-Feb-88 O1-Apr-88 7.000$ 7.000 O1-Mar-88 Ol-Mar-89 Alpine Bank of Eaqle FDIC 7.000$ 7.000$ 24-Aug-87 29-Auq-88 Avq Yield 7.375$ 57 1 S100,000 365 335 S10,987 366 196 $100,000 ----------------------- S1,579,987 5332,993 Page 2 05/09/88 SJT Government Securities as of April 30, 1988 ***Treasury Notes*** Days to Ra tes Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Par Market No. Coupon ---- Yield --------- Date ----------- Date ---------- at Purchase Maturity Value Value 1 1.125$ 6.163$ 29-Oct-86 31-May-88 ------------ 585 ------------ 31 ------------ $200,000 ------------ $200,000 2 7.125$ 7.337$ 28-May-87 31-May-88 369 31 $260,000 $260,000 3 7.125$ 7.337$ 28-May-87 31-May-88 369 31 $590,000 $540,000 * 4 10.000$ 9.000$ 25-Nov-85 31-May-88 918 31 S1,315,000 $1,315,815 *: 5 6.625$ 7.018.$ ZO-Auq-BT 31-Jul-88 396 92 $250,000 $249,893 6 6.375$ 6.694$ 21-Apr-87 30-Sep-88 528 153 $250,000 $249,531 7 8.875$ 7.470$ 11-Har-86 15-Feb-96 3628 2847 $230,000 $230,934 Avg Yi eld 7.909$ $3,045,000 $3,096,123 Footnotes: _ ____________ __ * GO Bond Reserve _________ ** RETT Bond Reserve ***GNMA'S*** Years to Estimated Market Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Value Pool .Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding See Footnote -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5803 8.000$ 8.480$ 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.1 11 $96,921 $91,452 13003 8.000$ 9.500$ 29-Oct-86 IS-Oct-06 20.2 5 $76,320 $67,424 14659 8.000$ 9.200$ 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 21.2 5 $82,707 $93,619 Avg Yield 9.147$ $205,948 $202,495 Footnotes: ------------------------ * Market Value Changes Daily ***U.S. Savings Bonds*** Years to Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Maturity Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Cost Value EE 7.170$ O1-Oct-86 O1-Oct-96 10 8.51 $15,000 $30,000 Total $3,265,948 Page 3 05/09/88 SJT INVTR804 MARIAN V. MEHAN LEWIS & RICE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 611 OLIVE STREET ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63101 314/444-7600 March 21, 1988 Town Council Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: 443 Beaver Dam Road - Mr. & Mrs. Ben Rose Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Village Third Filing TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Ern N~P~R 2 s 19~~ CABLE LEWRICE-TELEX 43-4359 TELECOPIER 314/241-6056 Our firm represents Miss Elizabeth Mallinckrodt, who owns property at 93 Beaver Dam Road, Lot 36, Block 7, Vail Village First Filing. Miss Mallinckrodt .has asked us to inform you of her opposition to the request for a minor subdivision to create two primary/secondary lots on Mr. and Mrs. Rose's property. Miss Mallinckrodt is concerned with congestion in the area and feels that granting of the variance will aggravate this problem, thereby lowering the value of the pro- perty in the area. Thank you very much for your consideration. Very truly yours, i;, ~~ ~~..u CL~~i U. ~~ d~ ~-~-.~ Marian V. Mehan MVM : vef c.c. Miss Elizabeth Mallinckrodt Mr. Charles C. Allen, Jr. Mr. William J. Post town uo ai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 office of the mayor May 24, 1988 District Engineer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P. 0. Box 14 Omaha, Nebraska 68101-0014 RE: Two Forks and Williams Fork Reservoir Permits Gentlemen: VAIL 1989 The Town of Vail would like to make the following comments on the Two Forks and Williams Fork Reservoir permits. The Town of Vail is completely opposed to the issuance of permits for both the Two Forks project and the Williams Fork project for the following reasons. 1. Two Forks and Williams Fork are not in Higher than current water use figures population figures exaggerate the need need does not outweigh the detrimental recreation, economy, aesthetics, water wildlife values. the public interest. and in accurate for the projects. The effects to the quality and fish and 2. Two Forks and Williams Fork projects will have an unacceptable adverse impact in combination with other water diversion projects on the eco system. There are practical alternatives to the project which would have a less adverse impact to the aquatic eco system; e.g., conservation, dual distribution systems, joint use reservoir projects in the Fraser basin, ground water and transmountain diversion reuse. The Williams Fork project will cause and contribute to violations of State water quality standards. The proposed projects will contribute to significant degradation of the waters of the District Engineer May 24, 1988 Page 2 State by interfering with recreational, aesthetic and economic values. The projects do not include all the appropriate and practicable measures to minimize potential harm to the aquatic eco system. There are too many unmitigated impacts. Very truly yours, Kent R. Rose Mayor KRR/LAE/bsc lawn of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 office of the mayor May 19, 1988 Mr. Bud Gates Chairman Eagle County Board of Commissioners P. 0. Box 850 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Dear Bud: ~ ~~ ti VAIL 1989 The Vail Town Council sincerely appreciates the County Commissioners' willingness to participate in the I-70 Interchange improvement project and the $100,000 appropriated this year for the project design. As I am sure you know, the Vail Town Council has recently withdrawn support of the project and it will not be constructed this year as proposed. The public outcry against the project was mainly directed at the proposed signal lights which we could not convince the Highway Department should be a part of a later phase of the project. The Council made a political decision to stop the project at this late date because of the overwhelming opposition to signal lights in Vail. Even though the Town has incurred a cost in the neighborhood of $100,000 for the design work done to date, we will not be requesting any reimbursement of a portion of that or payment by the County at this time out of the $100,000 committed by the Commissioners. Your Board obviously did not-have any part in this decision, and we do not feel we can request your participation in light of the Council's decision. However, we ask that you continue to take a positive posture toward the Interchange project and be open to reconsidering the County's participation in a similar manner if the project is resurrected at some point in the future. Mr. Bud Gates May 19, 1988 Page 2 Thank you for your understanding and support on this issue and for the support you have given on other municipal issues this past year. Sincerely, ,,~r~. ~ Kent R. Rose Mayor KRR/bsc cc: Vail Town Council