The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988-06-14 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session~~7~, L'AIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1988 2:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Discussion with Chamber of Commerce and Vail Resort Association regarding Information Booths and Special Events 2. Discussion of Town Cleanup Needs 3. Discussion of the Wren Access Agreement 4. Discussion of Requested Funding for Nomestake II Legai Fees 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 6. Information Update 7. Other 8. Executive Session - Personnel flatter VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1988 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 1. Discussion with Chamber of Commerce and Vail Resort Association regarding Information Booths and Special Events Background Rationale: The Chamber Board and URA Board have asked to meet with Council to discuss transferring the information booths and special events contract from VRA to the Chamber. 2:45 2. Discussion of Town Cleanup Needs Ron Phillips Charlie Wick Action Requested of Council: Direction to Town Manager as to the paid use of Town personnel for additional cleanup. Background Rationale: Since the volunteer effort to clean up Vail fell short, the suggestion was made to use TOU employees for one-half of one working day to complete the cleanup task. See enclosed memo for additional information. 3:00 3. Discussion of the Wren Access Agreement Larry Eskwith Kristan Pritz Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny renewal of the Wren License Agreement. Background Rationale: The Town granted the Wren a license to use the Ford Park road for certain purposes for a one year period. That period ended on March 30, 1988, and the Wren would like the license renewed for one year. 3:15 4. Discussion of Requested Funding for Homestake II Legal Fees Ron Phillips Background Rationale: Information was received too late to include. in the Expanded Agenda. The item will be presented at the Work Session. 3:30 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Tom Braun 3:40 6. Information Update 3:45 7. Other 3:50 8. Executive Session - Personnel Matter MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Phillips FROM: Charlie Wick ('y.GcJ Pam Brandmeyer DATE: June 6, 1988 RE: TOV Employees Used for Additional Town Clean-Up PURPOSE: The volunteer turnout for the May 21 clean-up day was insufficient to clean up the entire Town. In order to have a complete clean-up accomplished yet this summer, a suggestion was made to have Town of Vail personnel spend one-half of one working day toward this effort. AVAILABLE PERSONNEL: There would be around 85-100 summer seasonal) who would be No overtime would be expended work during this time. employees (including a number of available for this clean-up. to have off-shift personnel EFFECTED SERVICES: All Town offices and direct services would still be offered during this one half day. Many offices would be staffed by only one or two persons. Police, dispatch, fire and transit personnel would continue to be fully staffed during this period. Fire personnel could perhaps be on duty and find some way to help with the clean-up. LONG RANGE SOLUTION: The clean-up day coordination should perhaps be done by an entity or group other than the Town of Vail. Volunteerism seems to decrease the more the Town is involved. The Town should, of course, provide a necessary support function for a Town-wide clean-up day. CRW/ds ~~ - a'c~-t~ -~~.-a WOODS AND KINNEY ATTOANEVS AT LAW BOETTCHER BUILDING DTC, SUITE 240 8400 EAST PRENTICE AVENUE ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 8077 i-2974 //i .• ~~~C~ (303) 7933339 ,e ~ ; •?Y' _T ~Jf ~. ALAN W0005 STEYENS P. KINNEY. II May 17, 1988 Mr. Rondall V. Phillips, Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: The Wren Association - Renewal of Limited License Agreement Dear Mr. Phillips: RICHARD W. BREITHAUPT SAecial Counsel You will recall that on March 30, 1987, The Town of Vail and The Wren Association entered into a Limited License Agreement regarding the use and maintenance of a roadway in the Gerald R. Ford Park. The agreement was for a period of one year, and provided that the parties could renew the agreement in writing at the end of that time for the same terms or such other terms as the parties may agree. My understanding as President of The Wren Association is that this arrangement has been satisfactory for both parties. I have prepared a short Renewal of Limited License Agreement which provides for a one-year renewal. If this Renewal is acceptable with the Town of Vail, would you please arrange for its execution and return one signed copy to me. The Wren Association would prefer to enter into a longer period. If it is acceptable with you to renew the agreement for five years, please call me and I will have the agreement changed to reflect that longer term and send it back to you for signature. AFC ~ MA`! 2 31~ Mr. Rondall V. Phillips -2- May 17, 1988 The SVren Association appreciates the cooperation of The Town, and looks forward to a continued mutually-beneficial relationship. Sincerely, ,^~ /p w ,~~ ; i. ~,i ;, ~~~,~., Alan Woods bn 8535C Enclosure xc: Mr. Bob Gass, Manager, The Wren Members, Board of Directors Mr. Larry Eskwith P4r. Stan Berryman ~ c RENEWAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS RENEWAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of April 1, 1988, by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation ("the Town") and THE WREN ASSOCIATION, a Colorado not-for-profit corporation ("The Wren"). A. The Town and The Wren entered into a Limited License Agreement on March 30, 1987, ("the Agreement") which set forth, among other things, the usage and maintainance of a roadway located on Gerald R. Ford Park. B. The parties desire to renew the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 9 of the Agreement. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to renew the Agreement for one year, commencing April 1, 1988, under the same terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Renewal of License Agreement on the day of May, 1988, effective April 1, 1988. TOWN OF VAIL By THE WREN ASSOCIATION By Alan Woods, President 1103A NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ~~C'D JUN 1 0 19$~ Post Office Box 739 Frisco, Colorado 80443 Frisco 303 668-5445 Denver Direct 303 573-761.1 M E M O R A N D U M To: Headwaters Counties and Towns From: Jerry Roberts, Chairman NWCCOG Subj: Two Fortis Followup, Homestake Litigation Date: April 20, 1988 .~W.S2._..k'.A.~).~.~._...F.4.~...~.owup We will meet at 10 a,m. at the Silverthorne Town Hall (overlooking the threatened Blue River) on Thursday, May 12th in order to formulate our written statement to the Corps of Engineers and USFS on the Two Forks SEIS. It is important that we make points that the Corps can hang their hats on to deny the permit or place mitigation and restrictions on the construction of the project. Col. West has requested a list of conditions precedent in the event a permit is granted. We also need to address the effects of the alternative projects proposed by the Environmental Caucus as they relate to the West Slope before we can accept or reject their proposal. Dick Gorton, Corps of Engineers, Eric Kuhn and Barbara Green will present the technical issues related to the Environmental Caucus position. At our quarterly water meeting in Beaver Creek on March 11th and again at our meeting of elected officials in Frisco on April 13th the consensus was to support Eagle County in its litigation of the Homestake II issue. At our meeting on April 13th a discussion of three options resulted in the consensus that the litigation should be handled by NWCCOG and Holme, Roberts and Owen as Special Counsel. Additional funds will be needed to maintain current NWCCOG Legal Services to the region and provide litigation support. Eaflle County:A~n, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minl~sn, fwd Cliff, Vail, * Grand County:Fraser, Grar~y, Grand Lake, Hot Sulptxx Springs, Kremmling, Winter Park, * lackaon County:Walden, +- Pltkin Counfir.Aspen, Sna~vrnass Village, * Routt Counfy:i-k,>yrlen, Oak Leek, Steamboat Springs, Yampa, * Summit Couniy:Blue fiver, Breckenridge, Drlbn, Frisk, Montez~na, Sitverthcrne. Your commitment to these efforts with funding support is necessary. Although the following breakdown of the funds needed is based on our current (Land Use and Water Fund) contribution percentages, Eagle County could commit to pay a larger share of the costs from their budget if it became necessary. The services and expected costs are as follows: Contract oversight, performed by Holme, to do all associate motions to dismiss, prehearing motions, notebooks, preheari management and strategic planning to be Roberts and Owen. NWCCOG legal division work (discovery, answer, reply briefs, research, trial preparation including preparation of witnesses, trial ng statements, etc.) No trial: Holme, Roberts and Owen $ 50,000 NWCCOG: Barbara Green 40,000 Law Clerk & other contractual services 30,000 $105,000 Trial: Holme, Roberts and Owen $100,000 NWCCOG: Barbara Green 40,000 Law Clerk & other contractual services 30,000 $170,000 This scenario would require an a,d.c~.~...G.~..Qn.~..~. $55,000 to $105,000 divided among all members. The level of NWCCOG legal services would remain the same. If the 1988 dues distribution formula were used, additional cost allocation would be as follows: No Trial Trial Avon $ 3,025.00 $ 5,775.00 Breckenridge 3,025.00 5,775.00 Dillon 605.00 1,155.00 Eagle 302.50 577.50 Fraser 302.50 577.50 Frisco 2,123.00 4,053.00 Granby 489.50 934.50 Grand Lake 302.50 577.50 Gypsum 302.50 577.50 Hot Sulphur Springs 302.50 577.50 Kremmling 302.50 577.50 Silverthorne 2,123.00 4,053.00 Vail 4,840.00 9,240.00 Winter Park 605.00 1,155.00 Eagle County 12,116.50 23,131.50 Grand County 12,116.50 23,131.50 Summit County 12,116.50 _23.131...50 $55,000.00 $105,000.00 The logistics of the payments would be as follows: All bills would go directly to Eagle County, they would split the bills proportionally per your commitment to this fund. A bill would be sent to you each month and would be due to Eagle County. At this time we are soliciting the level of financial support your jurisdiction can offer to NWCCOG and Eagle County toward Homestake litigation. See the attached list of "Issues" for the value of the outcome of this litigation to all me-nber jurisdictions. We are asking for your consideration of this request for these additional funds and that you sign and return the enclosed letter to NWCCOG indicating your level of support by May 10th so we may proceed accordingly. Thank you for your careful consideration of this request. If you have any questions with regard to this funding or the litigation, please do not hesitate to call us. Issues: Homestake Litigation The outcome of the following issues to be decided in ttie Homestake litigation 88CV142 (Colorado Springs and Aurora v. Eagle County) would be of precedential value to all member jurisdictions. 1. Whether home rule municipalities have _~u..~..~ power to construct water works outside their territorial boundaries, or whether they are subject to reasonable regulation. 2. Whether Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is unconstitutional as it attempts to vest counties with authority to regulate/deny construction of water works by a home rule municipality. 3. Whether construction of water works is purely a local municipal matter whereby home rule charters and ordinances shall supercede conflicting state laws. ~. Whether Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is an unlawful delegation of authority to counties and municipalities. 5. Whether public utilities are exempt from Section 24- 65.1-101 (HB 1041). 6. Whether regulations adopted pursuant to Section 24-65.1- 101 (HB 1041) are so vague as to be unenforceable. 7. Whether Section 30-28-110 supercedes any regulatory authority over public utilities by local land use regulations. 8. Whether denial of a land use permit pursuant to Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is a depravation of a right secured by the United States Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. Planning and Environmental Commission June I3, 1988 2:00 PM Site Visits 3:00 PM Public Hearing 1. Approval of minutes of May 23, 1988 2. Preliminary review of exterior alterations: a. Extension of application for Vail 21 Building b. Up the Creek Restaurant, Creekside Building c. Gorsuch Building d. Hill Building 3. A request for a side setback variance to construct an addition to Unit 6, Cottonwood Townhomes. Applicant: Gail Molloy 4. A request for an exterior alteration in order to enclose a deck at the Gorsuch Building, 263 East Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Dave Gorsuch 5. A request for an exterior alteration and a setback variance in order to construct an addition to the Lionshead Center Building. Applicant: Lionshead Center Condominium Association 6. A request for setback variances and a stream setback variance in order to construct a residence on Lot 10, Block 1, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Robert Gunn 7. A request for a conditonal use permit for an addition to the information booth at the Village parking structure. Applicant: Town of Vail Withdrawn by 8 • A request for a conditional use permit in order to applicant construct a ski race/timer building on Parcel C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Vail Associates To be tabled 9. A request to amend Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code (Special Development District). Applicant: Town of Vail DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JUNE 1, 1988 2:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS 11:00 A.M. 1 1. Yashiro Marketing Sign, Brandess Building Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante VOTE 5-0 Consent agenda 13 2. Gombrich Garage, Lot 5, Blk 1, Bighorn 5th Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante Consent agenda VOTE 5-0 8 3. Vail International Carport NO SHOW 6 4. Concert Hall Plaza color change TABLED TO JUNE 15TH 1 5. Lionshead Bar & Grill railing, Concert Hall Plaza Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante Approved as presented w/color to match bldg. VOTE 5-0 2 6. Pine Ridge Townhome colors Motion-Leary Second-Gwathmey VOTE 5-0 4 7. Cascade Village landscaping TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 14 8. Klawiter/Distelhorst Duplex Parcel A, Woodridge TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 9. Gordon landscaping, Lot 1, Blk 4, Bighorn 5th Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante Approved 4-1 10. Talon Roof change TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 11. Cerisola color, 740 Sandy Lane Motion-Leary Second-Gwathmey Approved 5-0 11 12. Blu's awning, Gore Creek Plaza Bldg. Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante Approved 5-0 12 13. Subs & Spuds Sign, Village Transportation Cent. TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 9 14. Holiday Inn satellite dish TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 15. Nilo D'ard Sign, Vail Village Inn Plaza NO SHOW 3 16. Remey Remodel, Lot 8, Blk C, Vail das Schone #1 Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante Consent agenda VOTE 5-0 5 17. Vail Chevron sign variance TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING 15 18. Victorians at Vail, Units 1,2, and 3 Motion-Leary Second-Gwathmey Units 1., 2,&3 be approved as submitted, rear deck changed to align with window, details must be more carefully executed during construction. Units 4&5 in reference to details. VOTE 5-0 19. Gateway at Vail, Amoco Station TABLED TO JUNE 15TH MEETING OLD BUSINESS Alverde Windscreen Revisions STAFF APPROVALS: Gore Creek Plaza - Storefront Remodel Cadmus Addition - Lot 17, Block 1, Vail Village 11th One Vail Place - Deck Westview Condos. - upgrade paint Railing on NW corner of Plaza Conference Center - Cascade Vill. Villa Cortina Unit 360 - 250 s.f. bedroom addition Scandinavian Depot of Vail Sign - Crossroads Mall Sonnenalp Parking Lighting Sonnenalp Flagstone/landscaping proposal - Swiss Chalet MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Kathy Warren Sid Schultz Roy Sante Ned Gwathmey Dan Leary NEW BUSINESS ~eNVE~ PasT 6~gg -- KEYSTONE CONFERENCE CENTER ~ ~c~a ~ur~ ~ 4 ~g~~ THE DU PONT `COOLMAX' 1988 TOUR THE ROCKIES REQUESTS THE PLEASURE OF YOUR COMPANY AND A GUEST ON THE SPONSOR GUIDED MOUNTAIN BIKE TOUR HOSTED BY VAIL MOUNTAIN BIKE TOURS SATURDAY, 3UNE 25, 1988 10:OOAM-12:OOPM GONDOLA RIDE INCLUDED MEET AT THE BASE OF THE GONDOLA IN LIONSHEAD MOUNTAIN BIKES WILL BE PROVIDED IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE A COMPLIMENTARY PICNIC INCLUDED RSVP BY JUNE, 20 949-5710 or 949-1502 1989 BUDGET CALENDAR ACTIVITY Service Level Analysis sent to Departments for input CIP Packets to Department Directors Service Level Analysis to Council Service Level Analysis Returned by Council Results of Service Level Analysis to Council - Council Policy Input Staff CIP Prioritization I Staff CIP Prioritization II Budget Packets to Departments Council Discussion and Prioritization of Capital Projects Departmental Request Budgets Completed Citizen Budget Input at Evening Council Corrected Departmental Request Budgets Revenue Budgets Completed Department Budget Meetings with Ron and Manager's Budget Completed Compilation of Council Budget Packets Council Budget Workshops First Reading of Budget Ordinance Second Reading of Budget Ordinance DATE May 23 June 10 June 14 June 28 July 5 July 14 July 21 July 22 August 2 August 19 Meeting August 23 and August 26 Steve August 29-Sept. 8 Sept. 12 Sept. 12 - Sept. 16 Sept. 20 - Oct. 11 October 18 November 1 NOTE: Last possible Council meeting for budget adoption and mill levy certification is November 15. N NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ~G'D JUN 1 0 19$~ Post Office Box 739 Frisco, Colorado 80443 Frisco 303 668-5445 Denver Direct 303 573-761.1 M E M O R A N D U M To: Headwaters Counties and Towns From: Jerry Roberts, Chairman NWCCOG Subj: Two Forks Followup, Homestake Litigation Date: April 20, 1988 .~..W..S?.__.~'S?.,~.~.~...._.~`.P....~...~_owup We will meet at 10 a.m. at the Silverthorne Town Hall (overlooking the threatened Blue River) on Thursday, May 12th in order to formulate our written statement to the Corps of Engineers and USFS on the Two Forks SEIS. It is important that we make points that the Corps can hang their hats on to deny the permit or place mitigation and restrictions on the construction of the project. Col. West has requested a list of conditions precedent in the event a permit is granted. We also need to address the effects of the alternative projects proposed by the Environmental Caucus as they relate to the West Slope before we can accept or reject their proposal. Dick Gorton, Corps of Engineers, Eric Kuhn and Barbara Green will present the technical issues related to the Environmental Caucus position. .~.4.m_~.s..~.a.~_~..._..la..~..~..~.g ~. ~..~,.A.1~ At our quarterly water meeting in Beaver Creek on March 11th and again at our meeting of elected officials in Frisco on April 13th the consensus was to support Eagle County in its litigation of the Homestake II issue. At our meeting on April 13th a discussion of three options resulted in the consensus that the litigation should be handled by NWCCOG and Holme, Roberts and Owen as Special Counsel. Additional funds will be needed to maintain current NWCCOG Legal Services to the region and provide litigation support. Eaflle Counfy:A~n, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minlurn, Red Cliff, Vail, * Grand County:Fraser, Granby, Grand Lake, Hot Sulphur Springs, Kremmling, Winter Park, *Jackaon Count!y:Wak~en, * P1fldn CounlAr.Aspen, Snavrnass Village, * Routt Couniy:t-Icrycfen, Oak Leek, Steamk~oat Springs, Yampa, ++ Summlf County:Blue fiver, Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Montezuma. Sitver-hane. ., ;, , , , Your commitment to these efforts with funding support is necessary. Although the following breakdown of the funds needed is based on our current (Land Use and Water Fund) contribution percentages, Eagle County could commit to pay a larger share of the costs from their budget if it became necessary. The services and expected costs are as follows: Contract oversight, performed by Hol-ne, to do all associate motions to dismiss, prehearing motions, notebooks, preheari No trial: management and strategic planning to be Roberts and Owen. NWCCOG legal division work (discovery, answer, reply briefs, research, trial preparation including preparation of witnesses, trial ng statements, etc.) Holme, Roberts and Owen $ 50,000 NWCCOG: Barbara Green 40,000 Law Clerk & other contractual services 30,000 $105,000 Trial: Holme, F~oberts and Owen $100,000 NWCCOG: Barbara Green 40,000 Law Clerk & other contractual services 30,000 $170,000 This scenario would require an .a.,c~.~,.~...~..~,,.A~.~..1. $55, 000 to $105,000 divided among all members. The level of NWCCOG legal services would remain the same. If the 1988 dues distribution formula were used, additional cost allocation would be as follows: Avon Breckenridge Dillon Eagle Fraser Frisco Granby Grand Lake Gypsum Hot Sulphur Springs Kremmling Silverthorne Vail Winter Park Eagle County Grand County Summit County No Trial $ 3,025.00 3,025.00 605.00 302.50 302.50 2,123.00 489.50 302.50 302.50 302.50 302.50 2,123.00 4,840.00 605.00 12,116.50 12,116.50 12.116.50 $55,000.00 Trial $ 5,775.00 5,775.00 1,155.00 577.50 577.50 4,053.00 934.50 577.50 577.50 577.50 577.50 4,053.00 9,240.00 1,155.00 23,131.50 23,131.50 2 3 ,_ 131.__,_ 5.0 $105,000.00 The logistics of the payments would be as follows: All bills would go directly to Eagle County, they would split the bills proportionally per your commitment to this fund. A bill would be sent to you each month and would be due to Eagle County. At this time we are soliciting the level of financial support your jurisdiction can offer to NWCCOG and Eagle County toward Homestake litigation. See the attached list of "Issues" for the value of the outcome of this litigation to all member jurisdictions. We are asking for your consideration of this request for these additional funds and that you sign and return the enclosed letter to NWCCOG indicating your level of support by May 10th so we may proceed accordingly. Thank you for your careful consideration of this request. If you have any questions with regard to this funding or the • litigation, please do not hesitate to call us. Issues: Homestake Litigation The outcome of the following issues to be decided in ttie Homestake litigation 88CV142 (Colorado Springs and Aurora v. Eagle County) would be of precedential value to all member jurisdictions. 1. Whether home rule municipalities have _~u_1..~ power to construct water works outside their territorial boundaries, or whether they are subject to reasonable regulation. 2. Whether Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is unconstitutional as it attempts to vest counties with authority to regulate/deny construction of water works by a home rule municipality. 3. Whether construction of water works is purely a local municipal matter whereby home rule charters and ordinances shall supersede conflicting state laws. ~. Whether Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is an unlawful delegation of authority to counties and municipalities. 5. Whether public utilities are exempt from Section 24- 65.1-101 (HB 1041). 6. Whether regulations adopted pursuant to Section 24-65.1- 101 (HB 1041) are so vague as to be unenforceable. 7. Whether Section 30-28-110 supersedes any regulatory authority over public utilities by local land use regulations. 8. Whether denial of a land use permit pursuant to Section 24-65.1-101 (HB 1041) is a depravation of a right secured by the United States Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. ~~~ ~~ s ~ ` ~ , ti ~ ~~ SPOR'T~ Promotions R Event Services May 23, 1988 aJUN ~ ~ Town of Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado- 81657 Dear Town Council Members: On behalf of U. S. Sports, Inc. and Tour The Rockies 1988 Mountain Bike Stage Race, I want to thank-you in advance of the race for your generous contribution to what should prove to be the premier mountain bike stage race in the world. We hope to showcase our area as the leader in recreational mountain biking and through the support you have given to us, hope to accomplish this goal. Sincerely, Ted Martin Event Director - Tour The Rockies TM/nd cc: Post Office Box 477 Uail, Colorado 81658 Telephone: 303/949-6224