The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988-09-06 Support Documentation Town Council Regular SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 7:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Ten Year Anniversary Award to James Overcash 2. Presentation of Plaque to Gordon Pierce for his Service on the Vail Town Council 3. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes from August 2 and 16, 1988 Meetings 6. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance approving Special Development District No. 22, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. C. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance amending the plan document of the Town of Vail employees' pension plan and setting forth details in relation thereto. D. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance amending the Town's police and fire pension plan document subject to approval by sixty-five percent (65%} of the Town's police and firemen; and setting forth details in relation thereto. E. Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988, a resolution designating Banco de Bogota, 375 Park Ave., 23rd Floor, New York, New York, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. F. Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988, a resolution designating American State Bank of Olivia, Box 10, Olivia, Minnesota, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. G. Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988, a resolution designating First Service Bank, 15 Monument Square, Leominster, Massachusetts, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. H. Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988, a resolution designating National Bancshares Corporation, P. 0. Drawer 121, San Antonio, Texas, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, .and the statutes of the State of Colorado. 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 5.20.100 B. of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail expanding the types of events which may obtain a special events exemption from the transient dealer's license; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988, a resolution setting forth the rental rate for deck space located on property owned by the Town; and setting forth details in regards thereto. 6. 1988-89 Parking Fee Schedule and Expansion of the Village Parking Structure Design Request for Proposals 7. Tivoli Lodge Expansion Appeal CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 8. Adjournment VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 7:30 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. Ten Year Anniversary Award to James Overcash 7:35 2. Presentation of Plaque to Gordon Pierce for his Service on the Vail Town Council 7:40 3. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes from August 2 and 16, 1988 Meetings Peter Patten B. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, second reading, regarding Lionsridge SDD #22 Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: Existing 19 primary/secondary duplex lots are proposed to be resubdivided into 24 single family lots with a common open space. The SDD is required to adjust setbacks, GRFA allowed and lot size. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, on second reading, with conditions. Charlie Wick C. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, second reading, Larry Eskwith amending Town of Vail employees pension plan Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: This will be the fourth amendment to the Town Employees pension plan. The amendment is for a technical change to the distribution formula for a plan participant. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, on second reading. Charlie Wick D. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, second reading, Larry Eskwith amending the Police and Fire pension plan Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: This will be the fifth amendment to the Police and Fire pension plan. The amendment is for a technical change to the distribution formula for a plan participant. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, on second reading. Steve Thompson E. Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988, designating Banco de Charlie Wick Bogota as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson F. Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988, designating American Charlie Wick State Bank of Olivia as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson G. Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988, designating First Charlie Wick Service Bank as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson H. Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988, designating National Charlie Wick Bancshares Corporation as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988. 7:55 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, first reading, regarding Larry Eskwith special events exemption from the transient dealer's license Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, on first reading. Back round Rationale: This amendment will allow events such as Ride the Rockies or the Coors Classic to simplify the process of obtaining a transient vendors license for vendors who wish to sell goods or services related to the event. Staff Recommendation; Approve Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, on first reading. 8:15 5. Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988, setting the rental rate Larry Eskwith for deck space located on Town property Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988. Background Rationale: During February of 1988, the Town passed a motion setting a deck rental fee of $2.00 per square foot per month used. Staff would like to have the fee set forth in a written resolution we could mail to licensees for the enforcement and collection of rent. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988. 8:25 6. 1988-89 Parking Fee Schedule and Expansion of the Village Stan Berryman Parking Structure Design RFP Action Requested of Council: Approve/modify/deny the parking fee schedule for the 1988-89 season. Approve/deny the authorization to release request for proposals for the Village Parking Structure expansion and traffic circulation improvements. Background Rationale: The Vail Transportation and Parking Task Force presented short and longterm parking recommendations at the August 16 Council meeting. The Council acted on several of the recommendations. Council decisions regarding 1988-89 parking rates and expansion of the Village Transportation Center were postponed until the September 6 meeting in order to receive additional public input. -2- Staff Recommendation: Approve the parking fee schedule for the 1988-89 season. Authorize the release of request for proposals for the Village Parking Structure expansion and traffic circulation improvements. 9:00 7. Tivoli Lodge Expansion Appeal Peter Patten Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn/amend the PEC decision to approve the requested variances. Background Rationale: See enclosed memorandum and minutes. Staff Recommendation: Approval. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 9:45 8. Adjournment -3- MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 2, 1988 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, August 2, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Gordon Pierce Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: None TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The first order of business was a consent agenda consistin5 of: A. Approval of the minutes from July 5 and 19, 1988 meetings. 6. Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1988, second reading, changing the hour of 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. for closing down amplified sound in the Core. C. Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1988, second reading, repealing and reenacting the Special Development Districts section of the Municipal Code. Mayor Rose changed some wording in the July 5 minutes. At this time, Tom Steinberg made a motion to approve the minutes, which Gordon Pierce seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Afterwards, Mayor Rose read the full titles of the ordinances. Mayor Pro Tem Slevin asked Peter Patten what was happening on Ordinance No. 21 regarding the underlying zoning, which Peter stated the wording would stay as is until a later date. After some discussion by Council, Peter commented the ordinance was to clean up and clarify some language so the process is more understandable, with everything remaining the same. He then clarified some issues for Council regarding the ordinance. Peter Jamar felt the issue should be dealt with while it was fresh in everyone's minds; that it should not be postponed for too long a time. At this time, Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve Items B and C of the Consent Agenda, and Mayor Pro Tem Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1988, second reading, amending the Municipal Code pertaining to parking fees charged for exempted areas. Mayor Rose read the title in full. Peter Patten noted the dollar amount of the fee had been changed from $10,000 to $8,000 as requested at first reading. Mayor Rose gave background information regarding parking fees and how it got started. He explained his concern over raising fees for developers, and in-his opinion, the funds should be raised by other means, i.e., increase taxes, increase sales tax 2~, or whatever, to do what is needed for the town, but he would not vote for an increase in the parking fee. Gordon Pierce agreed and commented he felt the increase would not be worth it. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal stated that at the last meeting she felt that $8,000 was fair and the Town should pass on its actual costs. She noted she could understand the need for a parking study to find out who uses the structures. and that small additions have problems with the dollar amount. But she was not comfortable with leaving the fee at the present figures, but may agree to $6,000 instead of the $8,000. Merv Lapin questioned the equity of other areas outside the Cores. Peter Patten responded with all were required to have physical parking spaces or pay the fee. Jay Peterson commented on the differences between the areas. Merv asked Jay to expand on the equities and noted his concerns of how parking structures additions were to be paid for; Jay responded. Josef Staufer stated the differences between Bridge Street and Crossroads. He also commented that it cost approximately $12,000 to build a parking space, but he owned it, but those in the parking fee do not get anything. He stated the $3,000 was a token amount to help share the cost of parking in the future and if the fee is changed to $8,000, it would only be fair to physically give parking space in the structures. Bob Fritch commented on his perspective of the proposal and why he was against the increase. Peter Jamar stated that parking was figured the same in the Village as it was in West Uail which usually would not be done, explained why, and commented why he was opposed to the increase. Jack Curtin explained why he was also against the ordinance. Hermann Staufer agreed with Mayor Rose and explained that the fees had been used for studies, etc. in the past, and were not ever used to build. the parking structures. He requested Council not to pass the ordinance. Sid Schultz commented he felt it contradicted the Vail Master Plan and Urban Design Guide for Lionshead. After more general discussion, Tom Steinberg made a motion to withdraw the ordinance and reconsider after a parking study was completed; Mayor Pro Tem Slevin seconded. Mayor Rose stated he would prefer a motion to approve or deny the ordinance on second reading. Tom Steinberg then made a motion to deny the ordinance. There was more discussion at this point by Josef Staufer, Paul Johnston, Pepi Gramshammer and Council. Mayor Rose noted if the ordinance was denied, the fees would remain the same as in the past. Mayor Pro Tem Slevin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2, with Eric Affeldt and Merv Lapin opposing. The third item was Resolution No. 29, Series of 1988, regarding annexation of the Ulbrich property to the Town of Vail. Ron Phillips stated the property was at the west end of the Vail das Schone subdivision and part of Ulbrich's property was annexed when the Vail das Schone annexation occurred. There was not sufficient contiguity, however, to take all of the property at that time, and Mr. Ulbrich now wants to annex the rest of it. Merv Lapin asked if Ulbrich was coming into the Water District and the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District, which Jay Peterson responded yes, he was. Merv wanted to make the resolution conditional upon these requirements. Jay commented that now was not appropriate, that this was only the resolution setting the public hearing; the conditions should be included in the ordinance required at a later date. A motion to approve the resolution was then made by Merv Lapin and seconded by Gordon Pierce. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item of business was discussion of the Holy Cross parcel. Merv Lapin stated because he had been in China when the item was originally brought up, he wanted to discuss it again and to plan for the future. Al Weiss commented it was inappropriate to reintroduce the proposition again, which Mayor Rose disagreed. Merv clarified why it was reintroduced. Tom Steinberg noted he voted against it at the first reading, did not vote at second reading, but at the following meeting suggested the purchase be looked at for long term planning. Pepi Gramshammer agreed with Al Weiss and suggested Council let it rest for awhile. An unknown citizen questioned if the property was commercially developable by itself and was it supported by the citizens. He did not feel it was. Al Weiss questioned that no specific future use was mentioned and felt Council was using poor judgment. Peter Jamar commended Council on looking into long range prudent planning to tie the land up and keep their options open. He felt it made a lot of sense. Paul Johnston agreed. Gordon Pierce stated this was just to reopen discussions on this parcel and felt it was very appropriate to discuss at this time. He felt Council had received some good input tonight and the purchase was worth looking into. Merv Lapin noted the property was also being looked at for possibly moving the fire station. Al questioned if Council was planning to call a special meeting or hearing to discuss this, which Merv responded yes. Mayor Rose stated he would prefer to deal with Holy Cross first and then go back to the public with specific facts. Gordon Pierce and Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal agreed and requested staff to work on potential uses. Council requested Ron Phillips to contact Holy Cross and begin negotiations. The fifth order of business was the assignment of the Village Popcorn Wagon lease. Ron Phillips gave brief background information on the item and noted Jan Buckley ran the Lionshead Popcorn Wagon and wanted to take over the Village one. Mayor Rose commented that Jan was doing a good job. There was no discussion by Council or the public. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the assignment, which Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item was the presentation of the 1987 audited financial statements. Charlie Wick introduced Steve Thompson and Jerry McMahan, who gave audit information. Jerry commented the Town was in very solid financial condition and that controls were good. He then answered questions from Council. There was no Citizen Participation. -2- There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 16, 1988 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, August 16, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Gordon Pierce Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: None TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney The first order of business was a ten year anniversary award to Conrad Pascuzzi. Ron Phillips stated Conrad had worked for the Town since August, 1978 and began as a Maintenance Worker. Conrad was later promoted up to a Heavy Equipment Operator II. Stan Berryman commented he appreciated someone like Conrad who is inquisitive enough to follow through; he also felt Conrad was an outstanding employee and a pleasure to work with. The next item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, first reading, regarding Lionsridge special development district no. 22. Mayor Rose read the full title. He then stated he would probably be doing some development work on the project, so would abstain from voting. Peter Patten gave background information on the project and explained the ordinance would take the existing 19 primary/secondary duplex lots and resubdivide them into 24 single family lots with a common open space. He then discussed the criteria used in the preliminary plan for a major subdivision; and that the proposal met all subdivision regulations criteria. He also noted there were no environmental impacts. Peter commented the only potential problem was the access road, which staff would continue to work on. He then explained why staff recommended approval with conditions as stated in the ordinance. Peter Jamar felt it was important to note this was a preliminary plat, stated his concerns and their planned goals for the development. He also elaborated on some of Peter Patten's comments. Eric Affeldt questioned Peter Jamar about representing Commercial Federal and questioned the reasoning for the SDD, to which Peter responded yes, he was representing Commercial Federal, and the SDD was the best plan for the property whether the land was sold or developed by Commercial Federal. Dick Hart commented he owned property across the street and liked the plans, but wanted to take the opportunity to work on a long range solution regarding parking problems with Solar Crest, the junk at Solar Crest, and the overhead power lines. After some discussion regarding the open space zoning by Council and Peter Jamar, there was more discussion about the neighborhood problems by Dick Hart. Larry Eskwith wanted wording included in the ordinance that the SDD would not be approved until the final plat was approved, which Council agreed. He stated he would work on the language before second reading. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance with conditions, which Tom Steinberg seconded. Peter Patten requested they include the changes and typographical corrections, which were: 1) page 4, no. 5, Lot 1 maximum GRFA should be 2,950, not 3,312; 2) page 4, no. 6, "The minimum frontback" should read "The minimum front setback"; 3) page 5, no. 9, "20 percent" should read "25 percent"; and 4) page 5, no. 11, sentence should end after "No. 22" and "upon second reading of this ordinance" should be deleted. Merv included these in the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0, with Mayor Rose abstaining. The next item was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, first reading, amending the Town of Vail employees' pension plan. The full title of the ordinance was read by Mayor Rose. Charlie Wick explained the amendment would basically change the method of distribution after an employee has left the Town. He then explained the changes and the reasoning behind them. He noted that State law required the police and fire plan to be approved by 65 percent; 81 percent of the police officers voted for it (22 for, 1 against and 4 did not vote) and 87 percent of the fire employees voted for it (13 for, 1 against, and 1 did not vote). The Town employees' plan included the same language, but employees were not required to vote. Charlie then answered questions of the Council. Gordon Pierce made a motion to approve the ordinance, which Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The fourth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, first reading, amending the police and fire pension plan. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Since Charlie Wick had already discussed the changes to the plan, there was no discussion by Council or the public. A motion to approve the ordinance was made by Merv Lapin and seconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The fifth order of business was Resolution No. 30, Series of 1988, initiating a special and local improvement project in the Booth Creek area. Larry Eskwith stated the resolution would start the formation of a Booth Creek rockfall special improvement district, but it would not permit spending money on construction. Mayor Pro Tem Slevin questioned the landscaping of the upper cut and the Town needed to plan for it. Larry responded the resolution did not deal with money; more detailed ordinances would follow that would. Gordon Pierce made a motion to approve the resolution, which was seconded by Merv Lapin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item was a Parking and Transportation Task Force presentation. Stan Berryman noted the Task Force presented information at the Work Session earlier that day, and their concept would go to the Design Review Board Wednesday. After some discussion, Stan stated the short term and long term parking recommendations by staff and the Task Force. The recommendations were as follows: Short Term Recommendations Staff recommended to not purchase additional landing mats for Ford Park at least through the next ski season; the Task Force concurred. Council agreed that no additional purchases were necessary except in small quantities for what we lose. Staff and the Task Force agreed on the recommendation to create a parking lot with gravel east of the tennis courts, to take out the berm north of the courts and add 200 parking spaces which would utilize the whole area. Council agreed with the recommendation. The next item was to move rental car spaces out of the Village Transportation Center. Staff recommended leaving rental cars in the VTRC, but the Task Force recommended to offer agencies office space in the building but move the parking spaces to the Lionshead Transportation Center. Council agreed to reconsider this recommendation in a year, but in the meantime, leave everything as is, except to change the lease terms to coincide with the ski season. Parking rates schedule was next. Staff recommended a $1.00 increase across the board generating $242,000 in revenue, and keep the first 1-1/2 hour free. The Task Force recommended to combine the 4-12 hour parking fees into a lump sum of $5.00 and to raise the premium parking pass from $425 to $475, to generate $75,000 in revenue. Council agreed with the Task Force's recommendation, but wanted the item brought up again at the next Evening Meeting to receive any public input. Staff recommended to not charge a fee for parking at the new parking lot to be created (in first recommendation) and at the landing mats; the Task Force concurred with staff and wanted to accentuate there was free parking in Vail. Council agreed. Long Term Recommendations Staff recommended the request for proposal (RFP) lump all issues into one; the Task Force recommended splitting out the parking structure expansion, Visitors Center, and bus terminal traffic circulation into three separate RFP's. Ron Phillips felt the bus terminal traffic circulation and parking structure expansion should be lumped together. After some discussion, Council agreed. Council also agreed they wanted the item brought up again at the next Evening Meeting to receive any public input. -2- a ~ The next order of business was the appointment of election judges for the special municipal election to be held September 13, 1988. The proposed judges were Joan Carnie, Celine Krueger, Mary Jo Allen, Pamela Story and Katherine Rossi. There was no discussion by Council or the public. A motion to approve the proposed election judges was made by Mayor Pro Tem Slevin and seconded by Gordon Pierce. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Citizen Participation was next. Mike Cacioppo asked about changing the West Vail off ramp from one lane to two lanes with arrows, like at the Main Vail interchange.. Mayor Rose stated the Town would ask the Highway Department and see what happened. Tom Steinberg asked about an ordinance concerning street cut permits, which Ron Phillips commented he would check on. At this time, Mayor Rose stated he needed to discuss a personnel item with Council and requested an Executive Session. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- ORDINANCE NO. 23 Series of 1988 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 22, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes Special Development Districts within the Town; and WHEREAS, Commercial Federal Savings and Loan has submitted an application for a Special Development District approval for Lots 1 through 19, Block 2, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 3 to be known as Special Development District No. 22; and WHEREAS, the establishment of the requested SDD 22 will ensure unified and coordinated development within the Town of Vail in a manner suitable for the area in which it is situated; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has recommended approval of the proposed SDD and major subdivision preliminary plan; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to establish such Special Development District No. 22. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled, Planning Commission Report. The approval procedures prescribed in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the report of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending approval of the proposed development plan for Special Development District No. 22. Section 2. Special Development District No. 22. Special Development District No. 22 (SDD 22) and the development plan therefore, are hereby approved for the development of Lots 1 through 19, Block 2, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing 3 within the Town of Vail consisting of 10.69 acres. Section 3. Purpose Special Development District 22 is established to ensure comprehensive development and use of an area that will be harmonious with the general character of the Townn of Vail. The development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and meets all design standards and criteria as set forth in Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code. As stated in the staff memorandum dated August 8, 1988, there are significant aspects of Special Development District 22 which are difficult to satisfy through the imposition of the standards of the Primary/ Secondary zone district. SDD 22 allows for greater flexibility in the development of the land than would be possible under the current zoning of the property. The smaller single family lots provide the opportunity for a common open space for the subdivision as well as to preserve the southerly ridge line of the property. SDD 22 provides an appropriate development plan to preserve the visual quality of the site from within the subdivision as well as adjacent properties and the community in general. Section 4. Development Plan A. The development plan for SDD 22 is approved and shall constitute the plan for development within the special development district. The development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Commercial Federal Savings and Loan and consists of the following documents, which will be finalized at the major subdivision final plat review: 1. Development Plan, Lionsridge Resubdivision of Lots 1-19, Vail, Colorado, Peter Jamar Associates, Inc. and Dennis Anderson Associates, Inc. dated July 8, 1988. 2. A resubdivision of Lots 1-19, Block 2, and Lionsridge Lane, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing 3, Preliminary Plat Survey dated July 1988 at a 1" = 50' scale by Eagle Valley Surveying, Inc. 3. Existing topography and utilities, a resubdivision of Lots 1-19, Block 2, and Lionsridge Lane, Lionsridge Subdivision Filing 3, dated July 11, 1988 by Eagle Valley Surveying, Inc. Scale: 1" = 50' -2- 4. Written application from Peter Jamar, Associates, Inc., lots 1-19, Block 2, Lionsridge No. 3, Subdivision and Special Development District; including a description of the proposal and a special development district; description of the development plan including lot sizes and maximum GRFA's for each lot; and including a brief environmental impact report as required by Section 18.56 of the Vail Municipal Code. 5. Design guidelines including architectural and landscape elements (to be submitted at final plat review). B. The development plan shall adhere to the following: 1. Acreage: The total acreage of the site is 10.69 acres or 465,656 square feet. 2. Permitted Uses: The permitted uses for SDD 22 shall be: a. Single family residential dwellings b. Open space c. Public roads 3. Conditional Uses: a. Public utility and public service uses b. Public buildings, grounds and facilities c. Public or private schools d. Public park and recreation facilities e. Dog kennel 4. Accessory Uses: a. Private greenhouses, toolsheds, playhouses, garages or carports, swimming pools, patios, or recreation facilities customarily incidental to single-family uses. b. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. c. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. -3- 5. Lots Sizes and Maximum GRFAs: LOT SIZE MAXIMUM GRFA 1 14,375 2,950 2 14,375 2,950 3 11,761 2,940 4 11,326 2,831 5 10,454 2,800 6 10,454 2,800 7 11,326 2,831 8 10,890 2,800 9 11,326 2,831 10 11,761 2,940 11 10,890 2,800 12 13,068 2,950 13 15,246 2,950 14 .11,326 2,831 15 8,712 2,800 16 7,405 2,800 17 9,147 2,800 18 10,019 2,800 19 9,148 2,800 20 10,019 2,800 21 10,019 2,800 22 9,583 2,800 23 10,454 2,800 24 9,583 2,800 68,204 6. Setbacks: Minimum setbacks for the location of structures in relation to p roperty lines shall be as follows: The minimum front setback shall be 20', the minimum side setback shall be 10' and the minimum rear setback shall be 15'. 7. Density: Approval of this development plan shall permit a total of 24 dwelling units on the entire property. -4- Allowable density on each lot is one dwelling unit. Allowable maximum GRFA on each lot is as per the schedule in section 5 above. 8. Building Height: For a flat roof or mansard roof, the height of the building shall not exceed 30'. For a sloping roof, the height of the building shall not exceed 33'. 9. Site Coverage: Not more than 25 percent of the total site area on each lot shall be covered by buildings. 10. Parking: Parking shall be as required in Section 18.52 of the Vail Municipal Code. 11. Design Guidelines: The development of each lot shall be guided by the Design Guidelines as approved as part of the final plat review and as incorporated into Special Development District No. 22. 12. Recreation Amenities Tax: The recreation amenities tax shall be assessed at the rate for single-family residential zone district. Section 5. Amendments Amendments to SDD 22 shall follow the procedures contained in Section 18.40.100 of the Vail Municipal Code. Section 6. Expiration The applicant must begin construction of the Special Development District within 3 years from the time of its final approval, and continue diligently toward completion of the project. If the applicant does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the Special Development District or any stage of the Special Development District within the time limits imposed by the preceding subsection, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall review the Special Development District. They shall recommend to the Town Council that either the approval of the Special Development District be extended, that the approval of the Special Development District be revoked, or that the Special Development District be amended. -5- Section 7. Conditions of Approval 1. A workable solution be found to the ingress/egress points of this project and the adjacent Solar Crest Condominium project. 2. Design guidelines, including architectural and landscape, elements be submitted to the staff with the final plat application. 3. That each lot fronting the cul-de-sac have a minimum frontage of 30 feet on the cul-de-sac. 4. More specific plans for landscaping and entry with lighting must be submitted. Section 8. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 9. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 10. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. -6- INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of 1988, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1988 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of ATTEST: 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of ATTEST: . 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -7- :, ORDINANCE N0. 24 Series of 1988 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PLAN DOCUMENT OF THE TOWN OF UAIL EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has adopted an Employees' Pension Plan, the effective date of which arras January 1, 1983 and has adopted a first amendment to said plan, the effective date of which was May 2, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has adopted a second amendment to said plan, the effective date of which was December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has adopted a third amendment to said plan, the effective date of which was June 17, 1986; and WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to again amend the plan document which sets forth the details of said pension plan, a copy of which is attached to this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, as follows: 1. The fourth amendment to the Employees' Pension Plan document which is attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference is hereby adopted by the Town Council of the Town of Vail. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this day of 1988, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of . 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- K FOURTH AMENDMENT TO TOWN OF VAIL EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN THIS AMENDMENT is made by Town of Vail (hereinafter referred to as the "Employer"). WHEREAS, the Employer adopted the Town of Vail Employees' Pension Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan" effective January 1, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Plan provides at Section 8.1 as follows: "The Employer may amend, modify or terminate the Plan..."; and WHEREAS, the Employer previously amended the Plan in certain technical respects and now desires to further amend the Plan to modify the valuation provision to determine the value of accounts prior to distribution; NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer does hereby amend the Plan in the following particulars: ARTICLE I A new Section 5.4 is hereby added to the end of Article V of the Plan (pages 11 and 12), such new Section to read in its entirety as follows: "5.4 Valuation of Accounts Prior to Distribution. In the event that distribution is to be made to a Participant or an annuity is to be pur- chased for the Participant's benefit, the .~ valuation of such Participant's account shall occur as of the end of the quarter prior to such distribution or the purchase of an annuity. In no event shall such valuation take place prior to the end of the quarter in which distribution is requested by the Parti- cipant." ARTICLE II and By Plan Administrators The amendment to the Plan set forth in Article I above shall be effective as of January 1, 1988. ARTICLE III Except as he reinabove amended in Articles I and II above, the Employer hereby readopts, reaffirms and redeclares each and every provision of the Plan. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, at the direction of its City Council and with the consent of the Participants, has executed this Amendment as of the day of , 1988. ' TOWN OF VAIL By 4 -2- tl ~. ORDINANCE N0. 25 Series of 1988 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN'S POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PLAN DOCUMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY SIXTY-FIVE PERCENT (65~} OF THE TOWN'S POLICE AND FIREMEN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council has adopted a Police and Firemen's Pension Plan, the effective date of which was January 1, 1983 and has adopted a first, second, third and fourth amendment to said plan, the effective dates of which were September 20, 1983, May 2, 1984, December 4, 1984 and June 17, 1986, respectively; and WHEREAS, the Police and Fire employees of the Town of Vail now wish to amend the Police and Fire Employees' Pension Plan a fifth time as set forth in the amendment attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, such amendment must be approved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, that: 1. The fifth amendment to the Police and Fire Employees' Pension Plan document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved by the Town Council subject to the approval of sixty-five percent (65%) of the police and fire employees of the Town of Vail. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or ,~ any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROUED ON FIRST READING this day of , 1988, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Uail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1988• Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer,. Town Clerk -2- "+r • w. , 0 V FIFTH AMENDMENT TO TOWN OF VAIL POLICE AND FIRE EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN THIS AMENDMENT is made by Town of Vail (hereinafter referred to as the "Employer"). WHEREAS, the Employer adopted the Town of Vail Police and Fire Employees' Pension Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan" effective January 1, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Plan provides at Section 8.1 as follows: "The Employer may amend, modify or terminate the Plan upon approval of such amendment, modifi- cation or termination by 65~ of the active Partici- pants..."; and WHEREAS, the Employer, with the consent of the Parti- cipants, previously amended the Plan in certain technical respects and now desires to further amend the Plan to modify the valuation provision to determine the value of accounts prior to distribution; NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer does hereby amend the Plan in the following particulars: ~ATT('T ~' T A new Section 5.4 is hereby added to the end of Article V of the Plan (pages 13 and 14), such new Section to read in-its entirety as follows: :. • yy ~ "5.4 Valuation of Accounts Prior to Distribution. In the event that distribution is to be made to a Participant or an annuity is to be pur- chased for the Participant's benefit, the valuation of such Participant's account shall occur as of the end of the quarter prior to such .distribution or the purchase of an annuity. In no event shall such valuation take place prior to the end of the quarter in which distribution is requested by the Parti- cipant." ARTICLE II The amendment to the Plan set forth in Article I above shall be effective as of January 1, 1988. ,, ARTICLE III Except as hereinabove amended in Articles I and II above, the Employer hereby readopts, reaffirms and redeclares each and every provision of the Plan. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, at the direction of its City Council and with the consent of sixty-five percent (65$) of the active Participants, has executed this Amendment as of the day of , 198 g . TOWN OF VAIL By and By Plan Administrators -2- t y RESOLUTION NO. 32 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING BANCO DE BOGOTA, 375 PARK AVE., 23RD FLOOR, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, AS A DEPOSITORY FOR THE FUNDS OF THE TOWN AS PERMITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions as depositories for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate Banco De Bogota as a depository for the funds of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. Banco De Bogata is hereby designated as a depository for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. Charles Wick, the Director of Administrative Services of the Town of Vail, or his successor, and Steve Thompson, Financial Controller of the Town of Vail, or his successor, are hereby authorized to open any deposit or checking accounts in the name of the Town of Vail at Banco De Bogota. When an account with Banco De Bogota is liquidated, a wire transfer should be made to the Town of Vail's account # 570-0337, at the First Bank of Vail, Colorado. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Kent Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 33 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING AMERICAN STATE BANK OF OLIVIA, BOX 10, OLIVIA, MINNESOTA, AS A DEPOSITORY FOR THE FUNDS OF THE TOWN AS PERMITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions as depositories for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate American State Bank of Olivia as a depository for the funds of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. American State Bank of Olivia is hereby designated as a depository for the funds of the Town of Vail. 20 Charles Wick, the Director of Administrative Services of the Town of Vail, or his successor,_ and Steve Thompson, Financial Controller of .the Town of Vail, or his successor, are hereby authorized to open any deposit or checking accounts in the name of the Town of Vail at American State Bank of Olivia. When an account with American State Bank of Olivia is liquidated, a wire transfer should be made to the Town of Vail's account # 570-0337, at the First Bank of Vail, Colorado. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Kent Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 34 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING FIRST SERVICE BANK, 15 MONUMENT SQUARE, LEOMINSTER, MASSACHUSETTS, AS A DEPOSITORY FOR THE FUNDS OF THE TOWN AS PERMITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions as depositories for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate First Service Bank as a depository for the funds of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. First Service Bank is hereby designated as a depository for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. Charles Wick, the Director of Administrative Services of the Town of Vail, or his successor, and Steve Thompson, Financial Controller of the Town of Vail, or his successor, are hereby authorized to open any deposit or checking accounts in the name of the Town of Vail at First Service Bank. When an account with First Service Bank is liquidated, a wire transfer should be made to the Town of Vail's account # 570-0337, at the First Bank of Vail, Colorado. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Kent Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 35 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION, P . O. DRAWER 121 , SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS , AS A DEPOSITORY FOR THE FUNDS OF THE TOWN AS PERMITTED BY THE CHARTER OF THE TOWN, ITS ORDINANCES, AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Town has the power to designate banks or financial institutions as depositories for funds of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes to designate National Bancshares Corporation as a depository for the funds of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: 1. National Bancshares Corporation is hereby designated as a depository for the funds of the Town of Vail. 2. Charles Wick, the Director of Administrative Services of the Town of Vail, or his successor, and Steve Thompson, Financial Controller of the Town of Vail,. or his successor, are hereby authorized to open any deposit or checking accounts in the name of the Town of Vail at National Bancshares Corporation. When an account with National Bancshares Corportioan is liquidated, a check shall be made to the Town of Vail and mailed to 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Kent xose, rlayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ORDINANCE N0. 26 Series of 1988 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTION 5.20.100 B. OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL EXPANDING THE TYPES OF EVENTS WHICH MAY OBTAIN A SPECIAL EVENTS EXEMPTION FROM THE TRANSIENT DEALER'S LICENSE; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to expedite the transient dealers license process for various kinds of community events. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: 1. Section 5.20.100 B. is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 5.20.100 B. Any fair, show or exhibition of arts, crafts or similar handiwork, any sports event, educational or recreational event or cultural activity may apply to the Town Council for a special events license. Said application shall include the name and local address of the sponsor, proposed duration, number of exhibitionists or merchants taking part in the event, purpose of the event, goods or types of goods to be sold, and a statement as to whether or not the applicant or its agents have ever been convicted of any crime or misdemeanor and the nature thereof. (1) At the time of the filing of the application a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be paid to the Town Clerk to cover the cost of investigating the facts stated therein. (2) The Town Council may impose conditions on the approval of the special events license including required sanitation and clean up measures, security measures, bond to guarantee performance of any condition or to secure the payment of the sales tax due the Town. Upon issuance of a special events license, individual vendors listed on the application will not be required to obtain transient vendors licenses. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this day of , 1988, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- RESOLUTION N0. 31 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE RENTAL RATE FOR DECK SPACE LOCATED ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE TOWN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARDS THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council in February 1988 by motion set forth a rental rate of two dollars ($2.00) per square foot for each month used by the Lessee as a uniform rental rate to be charged for deck space located on Town property; and WHEREAS, the Town Council now wishes to memorialize said rental rate by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: The rent for all deck space located on Town of Vail property shall be two dollars ($2.00) per square foot of deck space per month for each month the Lessee utilizes said deck space. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ..' r ISSUE: PARKING RATE SCHEDULES 1987-1988 SCHEDULE TOWN OF VAIL PARKING PASSES, COUPONS AND RATES INFORMATION 1987-1988 SKI SEASON Daily Parking Fee Schedule Hours Cost 0 thru 1.5 hours $Free 1.5 thru 2 hours $1.00 2 thru 4 hours $3.00 4 thru 6 hours $4.00 6 thru 12 hours $5.00 12 thru 24 hours $6.00 Night Rate 6 P.M. to 3 A.M. $3.00 Premium (Gold) Parking Pass Premium season parking passes cost $425 plus $25 deposit. The premium pass is valid in both the Village and LionsHead parking structures at any time, no restrictions. Sales of the premium parking pass are limited to 100 at a first come, first serve basis. Limited (Blue) Parking Pass Limited season parking passes cost $200 plus $25 deposit. The limited pass is valid in the LionsHead structure at any time. The pass is valid in the Village structure on non-restricted days at any time and on restricted days from 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Parking Coupons Parking coupons cost $40 for 30 coupons. The parking coupons are valid in the LionsHead structure at any time. The parking coupons are valid in the Village structure on non-restricted days at any time and on restricted days from 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. The parking coupons are available all season. Restricted Days The restricted days are all weekends (Saturday & Sunday) of the ski season. They are not valid until December 1, 1987. Not valid from December 26, 1987 thru January 2, 1988. No valid February 13, 14, and 15, 1988. r, The above rates have been in effect since the 1985-86 ski season. 1988 ESTIMATED REVENUES Village Daily Parking $480,000 LionsHead Daily Parking $298,000 Parking Passes $ 62,000 Parking Coupons $ 60,000 $900,000 Parking Rate Options: - Increase all rates $1.00. Generates approximately $242,000 additional revenue annually. - Eliminate current 0-1-1/2 hours free parking and charge $1.00. Generates approximately $150,000 additional revenue annually. - Expansion of the Village Parking Structure with 400 additional parking spaces could generate approximately $70,000 of additional annual revenue. This estimate is based on overall (both structures) increase of 9% Although parking in the VTRC would increase drastically, it is probable that LHTRC revenue would decrease as those vehicles are, in essence, shifted into the Village Parking Structure. Town of Vail Staff Recommendations: - Raise parking rates $1.00 across the board and expand VTRC parking by 400 spaces. These actions could be anticipated to generate $312,000 additional annual revenue: - Raise all fees $1.00 = X242,000 (based on 258,200 paid transactions 1987-88 less 6% because of fee increase) - Increased revenue due to expansion = $70,000 - Do not change 1 1/2 hours free parking period. ` r, Transportation and Parking Task Force Recommendations: - Change daily parking rate schedule for 1988-89 as follows: Hours Cost 0 thru 1.5 hours Free 1.5 thru 2 hours $1.00 2 thru 4 hours $3.00 4 thru 12 hours $5.00 12 thru 24 hours $7.00 Night rates 6:00 P.M. - 3:00 A.M. $3.00 - Change cost of Premium Parking Pass from $425 plus $25 deposit to $475 plus $25 deposit. The Task Force felt that the above changes would simplify the parking rate system, making it easier for the guest to understand. The above changes will result in increased revenues of approximately $75,000. ~, REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VAIL VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION CENTER EXPANSION TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES BY TOWN OF VAIL SEPTEMBER 1988 Introduction The Town of Vail is soliciting proposals from qualified architects and/or engineers. The primary goal of the Request For Proposal (RFP) is to develop construction designs and plans for: 1. Expansion of the Vail Village Transportation Center from 800 public parking spaces to 1,200 public parking spaces. 2. Improved traffic flow in and around the Village Transportation Center. Consultants must demonstrate that personnel they will assign to the Project have the necessary experience. The Town is interested in reviewing the project experience of individuals who will actually work on the study. Thus, past experiences submitted by firms based on individuals either not with the firm or not assigned to the Project will not be considered. Scope of Services The primary objective is for the consultant team to develop comprehensive designs, plans and specifications for the improvements. The following tasks are outlined to give bidders a sense of the scope and detail required of the final product: 1. Develop a base map of the Vail Transportation Center area to identify, locate and dimension the existing conditions, including physical improvements, roadways, utilities and drainage features. 2. Develop a comprehensive traffic circulation plan that addresses loading and unloading of passengers for all functions utilizing the VTRC. Currently, the Vail Transportation Center experiences a great deal of traffic congestion during the ski season. A detailed traffic circulation plan should improve current as well as future congestion generated by growth. 3. Develop design, construction plans and specifications for expansion of the Vail Village Transportation Center to accommodate an additional 400 cars. The existing VTRC building is designated for expansion to the east. Consultants are encouraged to explore alternative design concepts such as leaving sections of parking levels open for better ventilation, as well as continuing the existing design. The specifications should include enough weight loading to add at least two stories or more on top of the structure for expansion at a future date. 1 4. Preliminary plans for all above elements will be submitted to the Town for review and approval. This submittal will include preliminary estimates for the alternative concepts studied and the consultant's recommendation for each item. 5. Final design, specification and estimates will be completed after preliminary approval has been obtained from the Town. This submittal will include the following drawings: a. Title sheet b. Construction plans, details and notes for all items c. Quantity sheets The final design package will be submitted to the Town for final review and approval. Upon approval, the consultant will assemble the bid package and advertise for bids. A selection committee comprised of a consultant's representative and Town Staff will review all bids and make a recommendation to Town Council. Budget and Schedule The starting date for the Study and Design portion of the Project is October 15, 1988. The bid package should be completed by March, 1989 to allow construction to begin by May 1, 1989. We would like to emphasize that time is of the essence in this project, as indicated by the tight time schedule. Evidence submitted by Bidders of timely completion of previous projects will be evaluated by the selection committee. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS Submittal Of Proposal Proposal shall be addressed to: Ron Phillips, Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Vail, Colorado Town Manager Road 81657 Twelve (12) copies of the Proposal must be submitted to the Town of Vail. Schedule Proposals must be received at the Town of Vail, by 5:OOP.M. September 30, 1988 in order to be considered. 2 Format In submitting proposals, consultants are to be aware that the Town of Vail strongly considers the proposal content and completeness to be most important. Clear and effective presentations are preferred with elaborate, decorative or extraneous materials strongly discouraged. The proposal shall be submitted in a 8-1/2" x 11" format with foldouts from this basic size utilized as necessary. The cover shall clearly contain the project title and the proposer's name. Consultant proposals shall be prepared using the following format in order to facilitate evaluation: -- Letter of Transmittal Part 1: Project Organization Part 2: Project Work Plan Part 3: Project Staffing Part 4: Experience Record Part 5: Budget/Cost Proposal Part 6: Appendices Each part should be clearly defined for easy reference. Letter of Transmittal The letter of transmittal is to be addressed to Mr. Ron Phillips, Manager, Town of Vail and contain a brief summary of the key points of the proposal. The letter of transmittal must include: - An identification of the firms involved in the proposal, and which firm is proposed as the prime consultant. - A statement that the proposal will remain in effect for 60 days after receipt by the Town of Vail. A letter of transmittal should be limited to one or two pages. Part 1: Project Organization This part of the proposal should contain a concise description of how the proposer intends to organize its approach to the Project. The prime consultant is to be identified as well as other participating firms, whether in joint venture or as subconsultants. The role each firm is to play in accomplishing the identified work program must be explained. Key personnel to be assigned to the Project by all firms must be identified, including a brief description of their role in the Study. 3 Part 2: Project Work Plan In this part, the consultant is .requested to outline his methodology for the performance of the' tasks identified in this RFP. The work plan should provide a narrative description of the method of implementing the work tasks as well as any substantive or procedural innovations used by the proposer on similar projects that are applicable to the study described in the RFP. Throughout this part, the consultant must clearly illustrate the generalized approach to the Project, and exhibit a clear understanding of the program. Part 3: Project Staffing This part shall identify key personnel who are anticipated to be assigned to the Project, for both the prime consultant as well as any proposed subconsultants. Each person listed must also be identified further through use of an individual resume. Each resume form must be complete and concise, featuring experience which is most directly relevant to the task responsibility which the individual will be assigned. Resumes should be limited to two pages per person. Part 4: Experience Record This part should contain a brief history of the firm and the types of work accomplished, an indication of current staff size, and the location of the office of the firm. This information is to be provided on each firm submitting as part of the proposal. A complete, concise and accurate description of each firm's experience w__hich is relevant to this project should be cited. The information provided should be oriented towards a demonstration that each firm or team of firms has had the appropriate experience to undertake the intended work program. The prime consultant is to provide information which demonstrates the proposer's expertise in complex projects. A list of clients should be provided. This list should include the name and telephone number of an appropriate contact person for each client reference. Again, ,the Town is interested in the past experience of personnel the firm will assign to the Project. Firms should not submit past experience based on individuals either not with the firm or not assigned to the study. 4 Part 5: Budget/Cost Proposal The proposer should provide a summary of costs for all services and materials anticipated to be incurred within the study. A summary table should be provided which indicates, for each task, the person-days assumed (broken down by Senior Professional, Professional, and Technical Staff categories) and the dollar amount involved. Materials, travel and other costs should also be summarized in this table. The consultant should review the work tasks and provide the Town of Vail with a statement as to the appropriateness and adequacy of the budget identified in this RFP and/or a total maximum fee for all expenses necessary to accomplish the work. Part 6: Appendices Information considered by the proposer to be pertinent to this Project which was not specifically solicited in Parts 1 through 5 may be placed in an appendix. The proposer is reminded that this is not an invitation to submit voluminous amounts of extraneous material. GENERAL CONDITIONS Limitation And Award This RFP does not commit the Town of Vail to award a contract, nor to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of proposals in anticipation of a contract. The Town of Vail reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received as the result of this request, to negotiate with all qualified sources, or to cancel all or part of the RFP. After a priority listing of the final firms is established, the Town of Vail will negotiate a contract with the first priority firm. If negotiations cannot be successfully completed with the first priority firm, negotiations will be formally terminated and be initiated with the second most qualified firm and, likewise, the remaining firms. Validity Period And Authority The proposal shall be considered valid for a period of a least 60 days, and contain a statement to that effect. The proposal shall contain the name, title, address and telephone number of an individual or individuals with authority to bind the company, who may be contacted during the period of evaluating the proposal. 5 Ectual Emplovment Opportunit The Proposer will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Proposer will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated equally during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. CONSULTANT SELECTION Proposals received that conform to the proposal instructions outlined in this RFP will be evaluated by a Selection Committee appointed by the Town Council. An initial evaluation will take place during the week of September 1, 1988. The evaluation process will result in a rank ordering of firms. Evaluation Criteria The outline below provides a list of the criteria and scoring system which will be used in the evaluation of the proposals submitted to accomplish the work defined in this RFP. General Compliance With The RFP - 5 Points - Format - Content Project Organization - 5 Points - Completeness of the project team - Clarification of management structure and accountability - Appropriateness of the project organization to the project. Project Work Plan - 15 Points - Creative approach - Demonstration of understanding of the project objectives - Work flow diagram - Appropriate methodology for the project work tasks 6 Project Staffing - 10 Points - Qualifications of project manager - Qualifications of key staff - Commitment to project by key staff Experience Record - 10 Points - Relevant experience of each firm - Experience of personnel assigned in similar projects - Random client references Budget/Cost Proposal - 5 Points - State ability to complete project within schedule Total - 50 Points Interviews In addition to the written proposal, the most promising candidate firms may be evaluated on their performance in an oral interview conducted by the selection committee. The interview will be limited to two hours or less, and will consist of a presentation (about 1/2 hour) by the candidate plus an extensive question and answer period. Interviews will be scheduled at a later date. The Town reserves the right to select a consultant based upon evaluation of written proposals only. 7 4 R TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 8, 1988 SUBJECT: A request for variances for side and rear setbacks, parking design, and density control in order to construct an 8 unit addition to the Tivoli Lodge located on Lot E, Block 2, Vail Village 5th Filing and Lot P-2, Block 3, Vail Village 5th Filing. Applicant: Robert Lazier I. DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCES REQUESTED The applicant has modified his proposal since the June 27th PEC meeting at which it was first considered. The following is the applicant's statement describing the modifications: "1) Density: The current modified proposal calls for 8 rooms (formerly 11) as follows: a. Two rooms at 378 sq ft b. One room at 336 sq ft c. Three rooms at 2 95 sq ft d. One room at 280 sq ft e. .One suite (a.u.) at 590 sq ft Total GRFA is 2,847 sq.ft. (formerly 4,345 sq ft) The basement space will be used as storage or a physical fitness type of room. 2) Parking The new parking demand is 6 spaces. The current parking requirement is 28.9 spaces plus 6 spaces for a total of 35 spaces. The current parking plan shows 18 spaces in P-2; 4 spaces in front and 11 spaces in the west lot. We can conform to the parking requirement by valet parking 2 cars in P-2, neither of which need to be moved off site for access. No parking structure is proposed and no P-2 modifications will be necessary. 3. Setbacks The west setback is now from 16'-2" on the northwest corner to 17'-10" on the southwest corner. The south setback is slightly greater than 6 feet. v C 4. Views While views are somewhat impacted for the 2 units to the north of the Tivoli, a substantial decrease in massing has greatly reduced their view impact. 5. Sun/Shade: The development has no impact on public property. 6. Landscaping: The development calls for a substantial increase in landscaping bordering the Town pedestrian path, versus the existing pavement. 7. Safety Aspects: The Town Fire Department has been increasingly concerned about the lack of a second exit from the second and third floors for the existing building. The new development provides such exit. If the new proposal is not built, a second exit at some point will need to be constructed which would in all likelihood eliminate 2 existing parking spaces and also increase the existing massing of the building without the benefit of C increasing the number of rooms." It should be noted that there is a variance required to allow 75% of the additional 6 parking spaces required to not be located within the main building and hidden from public view. This is a requirement of the Public Accommodation zone district in which the Tivoli lies. UNITS GRFA Existing: Proposed: Total: 14,171 sf Existing: 38 A.U.'s 1 D.U. Proposed: 8 A.U.'s Total: 46 A.U.'s 1 D.U. Allowable: 20 A.U.'s 2,847 sf 17,018 sf Allowable: 14,165 sf II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Criteria and Findings, Section 18.62.060 of the municipal code, the Department of Community Development recommends approval of the requested variances based upon the following factors: 2 Y C A. Consideration of Factors: The relationship of the requested variances to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. The substantial scaling back of the mass and bulk of the proposal in conjunction with substantially increased side setbacks has relieved the staff's concerns regarding the impacts upon the public recreation trail adjacent to the west. The combination of pulling the building back from the property line over 16 - 17 feet, plus the proposed heavy landscaping between the pathway and the building, will result in an improvement in this area. Furthermore, the 6 foot encroachment of the existing parking lot will be eliminated, gaining an additional 468 square feet of landscaping which is now asphalt. The redesign has also resulted in a reduced view impact to the units to the north. While acknowledging that these private views will be affected with the proposal, it is important to understand that our duty is to primarily protect views to and from public spaces. With regard to the parking design variance, there should be no negative impacts upon existing or potential uses and structures in that there is not an increase in asphalted parking area, but in fact a decrease. The degree to which relief from the strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege. The substantial redesign of the addition has brought the proposal much more in line with the mass and bulk envisioned for the addition in the Vail Village Master Plan. While a minor variance is required for the unstructured four parking spaces, it should be noted that neither the Ramshorn nor the Christiania (both located in the PA zone) were required to structure their additional parking in conjunction with their small additions. Regarding the setback variances, the redesign has resulted in near compliance with the 20 foot required side setback (16-17 feet from property line proposed). C , C When one considers that this scale addition was identified in the Action Plan, it indicates that approval of the project would not be a grant of special privilege. The proposal actually improves upon an existing nonconforming rear setback situation wherein the garage is three feet from the property line. The new building is now proposed to be to 8 feet from the property line. Finally, considering the Ramshorn and Garden of the Gods special development districts which increased the allowable density as well as the density variance granted for the Christiania Lodge, this proposal, if approved, would not represent incompatible nor dissimilar treatment from other sites in the vicinity. The effect of the requested variances on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. The proposal now meets its 35 for the entire project. This of 8 to 9 valet spaces (25% o maximum number generally used the recognition of four exist spaces along Hanson Ranch Roa Also, it is now possible to a of valet spaces on Lot P-2 wi backing onto Vail Valley Driv concern to the staff in the p intention of the 75% structur the PA zone is an aesthetic c is to minimize surface Harkin space parking requirement includes the introduction E the total which is the by the staff) as well as ing legal nonconforming i in front of the hotel. ;commodate a small number shout the necessity of ~. This was of major Devious proposal. The ~d parking requirement in ~nsideration. The intent r and maximize landscaped areas. The proposal actually reduces surface parking area and increases landscaped area, while more efficiently utilizing the existing parking spaces. III. APPLICABLE POLICIES FROM VAIL'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Again, the Vail Village Master Plan calls for a small addition in the specific area in which it is now proposed. A substantial redesign of the addition now is in general conformity with what was envisioned in that plan. The redesign of pulling back from the property line along the public walkway will allow for a substantial landscaping buffer to be introduced in this area. This will enhance the walkway and achieve another important policy contained within the Vail Village Master Plan. Another goal statement in the plan is to satisfy the parking demands with the private sector development proposals, and this has now been achieved. Finally, the addition of lodge rooms is an 4 important goal of the plan which is being satisfied by the C nature of this proposal. IV. SUCH OTHER FACTORS AND CRITERIA AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCES. V. FINDINGS The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance: That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: The strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the same site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The strict interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends approval of the requested variances for the addition to the Tivoli Lodge. The applicant has obviously responded in a strong and positive manner to the concerns of the staff and PEC. We feel that as described above, these revisions result in an acceptable proposal and one which will be an enhancement to the property and to the neighborhood in general. Benefits to the Town include achieving 8 additional lodge rooms in an important location as well as the removal of an encroachment in an area adjacent to a public walkway and a subsequent enhancement of the walkway itself with the provision of a 5 C C substantial amount of new landscaping. Moreover, through either the the granting of density vari, approvals adding lodge rooms units in the immediate area. for granting these variances nature. special development procedure or ances, there have been similar or short term rental dwelling We feel there is justification for this addition in a similar ~a.1,~311:'~. P~~~:~r Paunt~ ~it~bt', .~t'~+ ark i057t~ August 2, 1988 Planning and Environmental Commission Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Tivoli Lodge expansion Dear Commissioners: My wife and I have owned Unit No. 9 in the Valhalla Condominiums for the past 18 years. As we cannot attend the hearing scheduled for August 8, 1988, I am writing to inform you that we are strongly opposed to the variances that have been requested for the expansion of the Tivoli Lodge. In addition to the potentially adverse effect of the loss of mountain view and openness on our enjoyment of and the value of our property, our opposition is based on all of the factors presented by the Community Developement Department in their zeport to the Commission dated June 27, 1988. We feel their evaluation of the effects of this develop- ment on the neighborhood is realistic and that their analysis and recommendations are entirely logical and deserve the most serious consideration by the Commission. Respectfully, ~Gl`" '~~~' ' i, Foxhall A. Parker Copy: Dr. Phillip Lier ~a~ HARRY P. DAVISOI~T, JR. #3 VILLA VALHALLA VAIL, CO 81657 August 3, 1988 The Planning and Environmental Commission Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board: Although we are unable to attend your hearing on August 8, 1988, to consider, among other items, requests for variances in order to construct an addition to the Tivoli Lodge, we wish you to know that we strongly oppose such requests. We understand that the Developer has, to some extent, modified his original proposal, but in our view his request still involves too many variances impinging on density, setback, parking and restrictiveness of the pedestrian walkway connecting Hanson Ranch Road with the Golden Peak area. r Very truly yours, ~,~ ~ ~~~- f c~~ Harry and Margareta Davison GlUfu~r/~ea~~laeociatee FEDERAL EXPRESS August 4, 1988 The Planning and Environmental Commission Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Gentlemen: >6~a~e~ f give ~i~eere~~i% 6'onnec~0~8~0 ~G~'z~ume ~o3-~2a9 4~3~3 I understand that you are holding a hearing on August 8, 1988 on the addition to the Tivoli Lodge. I am the adjacent land owner to the west of the Tivoli Lodge, at 366 Hanson Ranch Road. I believe it would be very much against the interests of the town, as well as my own interest, were you to allow the variances requested. One of the assets of the Town of Vail is the zoning, which allows open space between buildings. The variances requested will certainly have a negative effect on this open area. I want to register my strong opposition to the variances requested. Very truly yours= Lf ~~ (~~~ Edwin C. Whitehead eu l PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION C AUGUST 8, 1988 PRESENT• All Present STAFF PRESENT• Peter Patten • Kristan Pritz Larry Eskwith Betsy Rosolack The meeting was called to order by Jim Viele, Chairman, at 3:00 p.m. 1. Approval of minutes of July 25 Diana Donovan moved and Brian Hobb seconded to approve the minutes as presented. The vote was 7 to 0. 2. A request for variances in order to construct an addition to the Tivoli Lodge. Applicant: Robert Lazier C Peter Patten presented a revised proposal of an eight (formerly 11) unit addition to the Tivoli Lodge. He showed site plans. He explained that by reducing the number of units, the parking requirement is now 35 spaces. The setbacks are now 16' and 17' (formerly 4' to 6'). Peter also pointed out that there would be landscaping on the west side near the public way. He explained that there was at present a 4' encroachment on the Town of Vail property. This would be removed and landscaped. Peter then reviewed the criteria and findings. The first one was the relationship of the requested variances to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity. It was felt that with the scaling back of the mass and bulk of the proposal with increased side setbacks the staff's concerns regarding the impacts were relieved. The re-design also resulted in a reduced view impact to the units north of the Tivoli. With regard to the parking design variance, he felt that there should be no negative impacts upon existing or potential uses, because there was not an increase in asphalted parking area, but, in fact, there was a decrease. Peter mentioned that the intent of the ordinance regarding parking design was an aesthetic one regarding the covered parking. The next criteria concerned grants of special privilege. The staff felt that the re-design of the addition brought the proposal much more in line with the mass and bulk envisioned for the addition in the Vail Village Master Plan. Neither the Ramshorn nor the Christiana, both located in the PA zone, were required to structure their additional parking in conjunction with their small additions. When one considers that this scale addition was identified in the Action Plan, it indicates that approval of the project would not be a grant of special privilege. Finally, considering the Ramshorn and the Garden of the Gods, special development districts which increased the allowable density as well as the density variance granted for the Christiana, this proposal, if approved, would not represent dissimilar treatment from other sites in the vicinity. The next criteria was the effect on light and air, population, transportation, traffic, etc. Peter said that the proposal now meets its 35 space parking requirement for the entire project. This does include the introduction of eight to .nine valet spaces as well as the recognition of four existing legal non- conforming spaces along Hanson Ranch Road in front of the hotel. Also, it is possible to accommodate a small number of valet spaces on Lot P-2 without the necessity of backing on to Vail Valley Drive. Peter stated that the proposal actually reduces surface parking area and increases landscaped area, while more efficiently utilizing the existing parking spaces. The next subject Peter touched Plan. The Vail Village Master in the specific area proposed. staff recommended approval of the applicant had responded in the concerns of the staff. upon was Vail's Comprehensive Plan calls for a small addition Finally, Peter stated that the the variances. They felt that a strong and positive manner to Next, Jay Peterson spoke who was representing the applicant, Bob Lazier. He discussed the parking issue and pointed out that 32 spaces were not valet parking, and also that the Tivoli had done parking studies the previous winter and had found no parking problems. Jay reminded the Board that the pedestrian path had been a concern to them and it was "opened up" again. Also, there was more landscaping being added. Jay felt the addition now met the requirement of the Town of Vail Code and the Vail Village Master Plan. Dr. Lier of Unit 5 in Villa Valhalla, the condominiums to the north of the Tivoli, reviewed the previous memo at which the problems of density had been discussed. He was also concerned about parking spaces and getting in and out without backing up into the street. Dr. Lier wondered where the dumpster was going to be placed for the Tivoli. Frankie Tuff, president of the Villa Valhalla Association representing the owners, -2- C wondered how one could check in and check out if four parking. spaces in front of the Tivoli were going to be used for parking. Jay responded that spaces to check in and check out were not required by the Town of Vail. He said that these were always counted as parking requirements. Frankie was not convinced that the parking problem was solved. He felt that the decor was being made more and more dense. And regarding the views, she felt that at some point, one needed to stop filling in the spaces and encourage a walkway. Rosalie Lier discussed the fact that for twenty-two years she had lived across from the Tivoli and watched cars and garbage trucks go in and out of the lot have trouble backing out and backing into the fence in front of the Valhalla. She added that many people do not know where they are going in that area and that there is a lot of traffic. Mrs. Lier was cognizant of the need for lodge rooms in Vail, but she wanted the Board to pay close attention to variances and asked them to deny this request. Jay then mentioned that the number of rooms that were approved when the Tivoli was constructed was twice as many of that which are now allowed on the site. Rosalie Lier then read the paragraph about views being somewhat impacted for two units. She stated that this was not true. She said there were seven units that were impacted with decreased views in the Tivoli. She added that taking off the west end of the addition did not decrease their view impact. Reid Lichtenfels, attorney for Mr. Davidson, spoke against the proposal. Reid mentioned that he did appreciate the limited concessions that had been made. Then he read from the memo of June 27 that mentioned that the large number of variances requested should serve as a warning that this is not a good proposal. Reid mentioned that the large number of requested variances hadn't changed. There were still five requested variances. He spoke about density. Reid mentioned that Jay Peterson had stated that they were well within the existing zoning. Reid felt that the 2,500 square feet being asked was not an insignificant amount. Reed then discussed the parking. He felt that the parking variance was very significant. He quoted from the Code of 18.52.060 which specified that the Town Council may permit off-site parking located within 300 feet, but that even the Town Council cannot grant an exception to the requirement that parking be on-site and covered. Reid then discussed the fact that the June 27 memo stated that backing out onto Vail Valley Drive from the parking lot was intolerable. He felt that physically one still could not valet park without backing onto the street. The next thing Reid was concerned about was the dumpster placement and felt that the only place for the dumpster was on the parking lot adjacent to the Tivoli. -3- Reed pointed out that the Town was only receiving one benefit: six feet of landscape and eight more units in parking for the elimination of six feet of asphalt. He did not feel that this was a fair bargain. He discussed view, traffic and safety concerns. Reid did not agree with any of the criteria. He felt that the physical hardship had not been addressed. He said, "you must find a situation unique. Not simply what was given to other people. You are really perpetuating what you have given to the other lodges in the same area." The next person to speak was a man named Corona who worked for Mr. Whitehead to the west of the project. He stated that Mr. Whitehead wanted him to explain that he was strongly opposed to the addition. Although his view of the mountain was not being impacted, he felt the sense of open space was being impaired. Larry Eskwith, the Town Attorney, discussed the variance section 18.62.010 B: "Variances may be granted with respect to the parking and loading section of the Code." He told the Board that there was nothing in the parking section that would limit them. He pointed out to them that they must find the findings - the first two and one of the third ones. Also that the Board must feel that what they find supports their findings. Galen from John Perkins office, the architect on the project, discussed different locations where the dumpster could be placed. C Jim Viele then asked the Board to make comments starting with Grant Riva. Grant commended the applicant on the changes that they had made since the project was originally brought before them. Grant was concerned with the parties who are in opposition and admitted that the views would be obstructed to a degree of the part if the project went through. But he added that regarding a master plan, this specific location was referred to as adding additional density. Grant agreed that there are still five variances being asked for, but felt that the impact and the scope of the proposal had been lessened. Peggy was the next one to speak from the Board. She felt that, as usual there were trade-offs. Regarding the view, she felt that the building would be high, would decrease some of the open space, but on the other hand, she felt that the pedestrian area would be enhanced. Peggy then asked Peter whether a car would in fact have to back out of the parking area on to Vail Valley Drive. Peter felt that the cars would not have to, that they could pull behind other cars. He stated that the Tivoli Lodge must instruct the workers who would be backing the cars out not to go out on the street. -4- Jay reminded the Board that the original proposal included eight valet spaces which would have required backing out. Jay stated that now the only reason a car would have to back out is if the lot were completely full. With regard to backing out into Hanson Ranch Road, Jay pointed out that cars back out onto Hansen Ranch Road at present and this would not change. Jay stated that 32 of the 35 spaces were true spaces for the entire project. Reid asked if it was true that there would be three valet ~~ parking spaces at the lodge and five on P2 lot. And Peter said there would be. Peggy asked Jay about the parking study that Tivoli had done and whether the lot had been full. Jay stated that the studies had been done at noon. And there were only two days from last season when the lots were full, and both of those were Saturdays which were check-in and check-out days. Bob Lazier added that the most cars that they ever had were 17. Peggy finished with a statement that she was not sure whether she had heard enough about the dumpster situation. Bryan Hobbs was next. Bryan sympathized with the people in opposition regarding the views and was happy to see the reduction in the amount of the request. He wanted to see more clarification of the trash pick-up. C Diana Donovan liked the fact that they were using more efficiently what parking spaces they had and not adding more asphalt. She asked that there be some landscaping by the newspaper racks on the P2 lot. Diana felt that if a person was here first, they should have some right to the views. But she did feel that Bob had addressed this. Diana wished that the Town and the Council would address the problems with views. Sid Schultz reminded the Board that the Master Plan called for encouraging additional hotel rooms and with the addition of more hotel rooms, there would be added bulk and it would impact views. Sid also wanted to have the trash problem solved. Pam Hopkins agreed with the rest of the Board and was pleased that the Master Plan called for in-fill in this area. Pam felt the trash removal problem needed to be thought out. She could not see how it would work. She asked also about how the parking would work. Bob Lazier answered that by saying that personnel could park in the Valet spaces and leave their keys at the front desk. Pam then added that she would like to see lightposts to identify the parkway. -5- Then Jim Viele mentioned his concerns. He agreed with the rest of the Board's concerns. He stated that any time that there is a proposal that affects views or other impacts, the Board hesitates to act on it. Views are really not protected by ordinance. Jim pointed out that the Master Plan did call for in-fill in this area, but that the initial proposal that was brought in was much more than what the Master Plan had called for. And Jim felt that he could support the proposal as it had been changed. Reid asked if location of the dumpster to the east of the building would require a variance also. Peter said that would have to be studied. Bob Lazier felt that the landscape area in the middle of the parking lot would be a better place. Mrs. Lier mentioned that the new children's center would even add more traffic. She was concerned about the pedestrian traffic on Hansen Ranch Road with the huge center being built for the children. Mrs. Lier said, "Each of you have concerns, yet each of you are going to support this." Jim Viele answered that if every proposal were cut and dried, there would be no need for a Board like this. Peter Patten felt addressing the safety was a good issue and that they are going to put in a new sidewalk connecting the Manor Vail Inn. Peter then mentioned that this was called for in the Master Plan. Although the Master Plan had not yet been approved, considerable public C review had been held at this point, and there would be more public review before the Master Plan was adopted. However, at this point, it was fairly well agreed as to the general direction between the public, the Planning Commission, the Town Council. Diana Donovan moved for approval of the proposal per staff memo with additional direction to the Design Review Board regarding landscaping on the P2 lot and locating lights on the bike path and possibly on the P2 lot. She based her approval on Findings 1 & 2 and the third one was that of a strict and literal interpretation. Peggy seconded the motion and the vote was 7 to 0 in favor of the approval. Peter reminded the audience that the decision could be appealed within 10 days to the Town Council. 3. A request for a special development district and mayor subdivision for Lionridge Filing 3, Block 2, Lots 1 through 19. Applicant: Commercial Federal Mortgage Company Peter Patten explained the proposal and showed site plans with open space and public roads. He stated that currently the site is zoned primary/secondary and is subdivided into 19 lots which allows for a total of 38 dwelling units. The request results -6- 1989 BUDGET/COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 12:30 Work Session Items 1:00 1989 Budget Overview The Town's Fund System 1989 Revenue Projects 1989 Expenditure Budget Service Levels 3:00 .Employee Compensation THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1988 6:00 Fire Department 7:00 Police Department TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 12:30 Work Session Items 1:00 Administrative Services Department 2:00 Town Officials (Council, Manager, Attorney, Court) 3:00 Insurance, Special Events THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1988 6:00 Contribution Requests 8:00 Library TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1988 12:30 Work Session Items 1:00 Recreation Department 3:00 Community Development Department THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1988 6:00 Public Works 8:00 Transportation 9:00 Heavy Equipment Fund TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1988 12:30 Work Session Items 1:00 Debt Service Fund Conservation Trust Fund Capital Projects Fund COLDSTREAM CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 1000 S. Frontage Road W. Suite 200 Vail, CO 81657 (303) 476-6953 August 30, 1988 To: Town of Vail From: Kevin Mactavish Re: Extension of Bike Path In addition to the above association, I represent the following associations in the Cascade Village/Glen Lyon area: Cascade Village Association Millrace Condominium Association Colorado Mountain Condominium Association My involvement with these associations represents all property owners in the area and over $100 Million in property values. On behalf of all of these and at the instruction of their boards of directors, I request that the Town seriously consider extending the bike path from the Cascade Club tennis courts through Donovan Park. Thank you for your consideration. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA August 31, 1988 3:00 PM 1:15 P.M. Work Session: 1. World Championships approval process 2. Vail Information Booth 1:30 PM Site Visits 1. Vail Information Booth, Village Parking Structure Motion for approval, Gwathmey. 2nd, Sante, vote 5-0. (Windows on north side as submitted. Recommendation that swinging doors be strongly considered. 10 2. Smith Residence Pool & Deck Area, Vail Village 6th, Block 2, Lot 1 Gwathmey. 2nd: Sante Vote 5-0 Motion for approval: 5 3. Cascade Club North Elevation Landscaping Plan Motion for approval: Gwathmey, 2nd, Leary, vote 5-0 7 4. Lionsquare Lodge, Lionshead, Color Change Motion for approval: Sante, 2nd Gwathmey, Vote 5-0 9 5. Galt Entry, Gore Creek Plaza Entry Riva. 2nd Gwathmey. Vote 5-0. Motion for approval: 2 6. Eve's Print Shop Sign, Vail Das Schone Motion for approval: Gwathmey. 2nd: Sante. Vote 5-0 8 7. Vail Village Inn Directory Sign, Vail Village Tabled 1 8. Talon Reroof & Color, Lionsridge Motion for approval: Gwathmey. 2nd: Sante. Vote 5-0 3 9. Raub Reroof, Lot 5C, Vail Ridge Tabled 4 10. Anderson Residence, Lot 8, Block 9, Intermountain Conceptual only. 6 11. Montaneros Repaint, Lionshead Motion for approval: Gwathmey. 2nd: Riva. Vote, 5-0 12. Williams residence, Lot 5, Bighorn 4th Motion for approval: Gwathmey. 2nd: Sante. Vote, 5-0. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Ned Gwathmey Dan Leary Grant Riva Roy Sante Kathy Warren STAFF APPROVALS: Hank Outdoor Rooms Maitland duplex, repaint Cleaver's sign, LH Center Amphitheatre bike racks Freedman roof repair Clark residence, 586 Forest, repaint TM ~~ lows o uai '~ 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 PROPOSED ITINERARY FOR PROJECT SITE VISITS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 3:00 P.M. VAIL 1989 1. Town Manager's Residence West Vail street improvements 2. Buffehr Creek Park 3. Potato Patch streets (next road improvement section) 4. Red Sandstone Park 5. Beaver Dam/Forest Road street improvements 6. Donovan Park Proposed cemetery site 7. Main Vail Fire Station (doors and heating system) 8. Vail Transportation Center (painting and wall repair) Garbage truck w/vacuum system 9. Recreational Path, to be viewed from the Covered Bridge first; then from the Vail Athletic Hotel and Club 10. Ford Park 11. Old Town Shops/Public Works (bus wash facility) 12. Nature Center/Water and. Sanitation Site 13. Rams Horn sidewalk 14. East Vail bike path (if time allows) RETT 13C1, D SEP ~ ~ ~~~ Revised: 9/ 1/88 TOWN OF VAIL REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX History and Budget 1988 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 ; 1988 1988 BUDGET MONTH - ACTUAL ACTUAL --- ACTUAL -- - ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL - ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE ----------- January --------- 63,999 --------- 98,089 - ------ 106,981 ----------- 119,972 ----------- 78,053 ----------- 80,733 - --------- 101,374 ----------- 131,916 -- ; ------------ 88,320 ---------- 96,119 ---------- 7,799 February 40,595 69,018 105,024 132,220 86,289 170,052 64,906 44,040 ; 75,687 109,873 34,186 March 69,886 126,935 109,533 137,820 62,693 63,831 92,557 38,791 ; 79,300 68,104 ( 11,196) April 76,855 94,653 65,900 103,526 173,321 90,396 182,743 95,554 95,731 179,671 83,940 May 42,738 84,324 54,663 90,599 96,006 228,673 98,651 120,984 ; 82,287 99,917 17,630 June 62,239 125,433 54,488 140,638 76,467 49,513 79,915 73,509 71,243 101,364 30,121 July 49,367 186,110 104,262 68,539 157,598 88,528 70,441 47,949 ; 81,307 126,537 45,230 August ------------ 79,859 --------- 115,499 ------------ 71,282 ---------- 97,806 ----------- 58,937 ----------- 32,860 ----------- 100,182 ----------- 61,137 ---- -- - ; --- 70,813 - - 109,315 - 38,502 Subtotal ------------ 485,538 --------- 900,061 ------------ 672,133 ---------- 891,120 ----------- 759,364 ----------- 804,586 ----------- 790,769 ----------- - --- 613,880 --- -------- - 644,689 --------- 890,900 ---------- 246,211 September 59,800 113,992 49,332 96,746 64,671 48,516 108,167 -------- 78,819 --- ; ----------- 69,052 ---------- ---------- October 108,510 154,000 42,498 122,546 88,732 109,633 93,860 124,291 ; 97,733 November 102,623 107,768 81,698 91,385 105,109 74,909 89,047 114,839 ; 87,177 December ------------ 142,662 --------- 133,867 ------------ 110,911 ---------- 56,533 ----------- 81,890 ----------- 333,139 ----------- 106,695 ----------- 95,495 ---- --- - ; - - 101,348 ---- - TOTAL 899,133 1,409,688 956,572 1,258,330 1,129,766 1,370,783 1,188,538 - - - 1,027,324 - - ----- 1,000,000 ---------- 890,900 ---------- 246,211 FORM 1103 (FORMERLY 984CT)-REV. 1881 CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT JUDGES OF ELECTION-CITIE6 AND TOWNS THE C. F. HOECKEL CO.. DENVER 33700 REVISED Precinct No......1 ......................... THIS IS TO CERTIFY That the following have been appointed by the........ TIAII~...TAy5l11L ................... . ...............COUNCIL ........of the............~QHII:I..01..V.A.I7a.............---......... (Governing body) (City or Town of) to serve as JUDGES OF ELECTION: Name..---••--•• ~O~id--eA-I2i3-~E-----------------.A'dcTress-----Z 9~f}--i~f~i~tN-`~-~~-'~:?~R...... Name...........e~I~E--IC-~E~'~-------------.Acrd-Tess.-----}6~ ~3~~~e:~~~l'~.~:"~~~....-- Name.......--A4PsR~-3A-Ab~33PI-- ....---..Address.....--X956-~~~~A1-.~~#~~~~.-- .............. ............................................ Name...........PAMELA STORY ............Address..........~2.3.Q...~t~~S4~...~A.~`ICH...~R~1I?...... ....................................... Name...........KATHERINE ROSSI ...........................Address.........51,37...$LACK...4'z0~i.>~...Rk~~~~..._..... ................... Name............~~A,1?XS...1{I;~II~II;X ................................Address..........~ 15.7....54#i~...C~k~~~,~...................... Name........... RUTH ELLEN KIMMEL Address..........2771 KINNIKINNICK; 4~E4---------------- ......... .......................... ...... JOAN NORRIS------------------------------------------Address..........141 WEST MEADOW DRIVE-;-- ~i2--.-,,,-- Name ............................. .......................... .. Also to Certify That the appointment of all of the above has been made in all respects in accordance with the provisions of the Colorado Municipal Election Code. 1\`'')))l~-+~1};~ ~,~~~ in Witness Whereof, I,~~-~~u:~?~:.. d~~idlA.t: ~Y-?1~!:L~~ ............................... . ., ;,•':~,,~'~'• ,~rr,!~;~,'~:;'~ city ` '•'' '• VAIL .~ • ` ~ ~'' '••, •, ••. 'Clerk of the Town of ......................................................... in the State of Colorado, •, ,•.• .. ~ , ~' ~ '~, ', :•.l,;ave hereunto set my hand and official seal, this...........1:Z7GEi .................._. ' ~. (• ~~ ~' ~ `..'.r ~ ~ •~day of........ AUGU$T ................... 19....$ 8... ............ ~, '~ '•'~~i,iii4i iti~iu''' • .., Judge of Election is to call in person at Clerk's office on Monday the ....................day...................................................., 19......... the d yy eggQQre EElection to pick KATHER~NE~ ROSSI up the Election and Registration Supplies. *The Clerk will deliver the Election and Registration supplies to....:?~•~~-~:-A~.~.}.N ........................ ......................................••-------.....................................Judge of Election on Monday the......12TH................. day of..........PaU.GUST ............... 19....$$.. the day before Election. Judges are required to meet at..........VAIL„MUNICIPAL,,,BUILDING------------------ - - - - SEPTEMBER 13 --- in said Precinct on Tuesday ................................................................................... 19...8 $., day of Election. qualify as such Judge of Election as the law provides. -Strike according to fact. Clerk should make extra copy for filing. Form approved by 0!llce of Secretory o! State VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 7:30 p.m. REVISED AGENDA 1. Ten Year Anniversary Award to James Overcash 2. Presentation of Plaque to Gordon Pierce for his Service on the Vail Town Council 3. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes from August 2 and 16, 1988 Meetings B. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance approving Special Development District No. 22, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. C. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance amending the plan document of the Town of Vail employees' pension plan and setting forth details in relation thereto. D. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, second reading, an ordinance amending the Town's police and fire pension plan document subject to approval by sixty-five percent (65%) of the Town's police and firemen; and setting forth details in relation thereto. E. Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988, a resolution designating Banco de Bogota, 375 Park Ave., 23rd Floor, New York, New York, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. F. Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988, a resolution designating American State Bank of Olivia, Box 10, Olivia, Minnesota, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. G. Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988, a resolution designating First Service Bank, 15 Monument Square, Leominster, Massachusetts, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. H. Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988, a resolution designating National Bancshares Corporation, P. 0. Drawer 121, San Antonio, Texas, as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 5.20.100 B. of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail expanding the types of events which may obtain a special events exemption from the transient dealer's license; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Resolution No. 36, Series of 1988, a resolution making certain findings a fact, and reaching certain conclusions relating to the annexation of a portion of the area of West Vail generally known as the Ulbrich property; and setting forth details in regards thereto. 6. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1988, first reading, an ordinance annexing a portion of an area generally known as the Ulbrich property; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 7. Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988, a resolution setting forth the rental rate for deck space located on property owned by the Town; and setting forth details in regards thereto. 8. 1988-89 Parking Fee Schedule and Expansion of the Village Parking Structure Design Request for Proposals 9. Tivoli Lodge Expansion Appeal CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 10. Adjournment -2- VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 7:30 p.m. REVISED EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. Ten Year Anniversary Award to James Overcash 7:35 2. Presentation of Plaque to Gordon Pierce for his Service on the Vail Town Council 7:40 3. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes from August 2 and 16, 1988 Meetings Peter Patten B. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, second reading, regarding Lionsridge SDD #22 Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: Existing 19 primary/secondary duplex lots are proposed to be resubdivided into 24 single family lots with a common open space. The SOD is required to adjust setbacks, GRFA allowed and lot size. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1988, on second reading, with cond itions. Charlie Wick C. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, second reading, Larry Eskwith amending Town of Vail employees pension plan Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: This will be the fourth amendment to the Town Employees pension plan. The amendment is for a technical change to the distribution formula for a plan participant. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1988, on second reading. Charlie Wick D. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, second reading,. Larry Eskwith amending the Police and Fire pension plan Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, on second reading. Background Rationale: This will be the fifth amendment to the Police and Fire pension plan. The amendment is for a technical change to the distribution formula for a plan participant. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1988, on second reading. Steve Thompson E. Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988, designating Banco de Charlie Wick Bogota as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 32, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson F. Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988, designating American Charlie Wick State Bank of Olivia as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 33, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson G. Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988, designating First Charlie Wick Service Bank as a depository for Town funds Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 34, Series of 1988. Steve Thompson H. Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988, designating National Charlie Wick Bancshares Corporation as a depository for Town funds Action Re uested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 35, Series of 1988. 7:55 4. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, first reading, regarding Larry Eskwith special events exemption from the transient dealer's license Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, on first reading. Background Rationale.: This amendment will allow events such as Ride the Rockies or the Coors Classic to simplify the process of obtaining a transient vendors license for vendors who wish to sell goods or services related to the event. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1988, on first reading. 8:15 5. Resolution No. 36, Series of 1988, a resolution making Larry Eskwith certain findings a fact, and reaching certain conclusions relating to the annexation of the area of West Vail generally known as the Ulbrich property. Action Requested of Council: Approve Resolution No. 36, Series of 1988. Background Rationale: This resolution makes the required statutory findings for the annexation of the Ulbrich property in West Vail. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 36, Series of 1988. 8:20 6. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1988, first reading, an Larry Eskwith ordinance annexing a portion of an area generally known as the Ulbrich property. Action Requested of Council: Approve Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1988.. Background Rationale: This ordinance effects. the annexation of the Ulbrich property in West Uail. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1988. -2- 8:25 7. Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988, setting the rental rate Larry Eskwith for deck space located on Town property Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988. Background Rationale: During February of 1988, the Town passed a motion setting a deck rental fee of $2.00 per square foot per month used. Staff would like to have the fee set forth in a written resolution we could mail to licensees for the enforcement and collection of rent. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 31, Series of 1988. 8:35 8. .1988-89 Parking Fee Schedule and Expansion of the Village Stan Berryman Parking Structure Design RFP Action Requested of Council: Approve/modify/deny the parking fee schedule for the 1988-89 season. Approve/.deny the authorization to release request for proposals for the Village Parking Structure expansion and traffic circulation improvements. Background Rationale: The Vail Transportation and Parking Task Force presented short and long term parking recommendations at the August 16 Council meeting. The Council acted on several of the recommendations. Council decisions regarding 1988-89 parking rates and expansion of the Village Transportation Center were postponed until the September 6 meeting in order to receive additional public input. Staff Recommendation: Approve the parking fee schedule for the 1988-89 season. Authorize the release of request for proposals for the Village Parking Structure expansion and traffic circulation improvements. 9:10 9. Tivoli Lodge Expansion Appeal Peter Patten Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn/amend the PEC decision to approve the requested variances. Background Rationale: See enclosed memorandum and minutes. Staff Recommendation: Approval. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 9:55 10. Adjournment -3- RESOLUTION N0. 36 Series of 1988 A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS A FACT, AND REACHING CERTAIN CONCLUSIONS RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF A PORTION OF THE AREA OF WEST VAIL GENERALLY KNOWN AS THE ULBRICH PROPERTY; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the landowner comprising one hundred percent (100%) of the landowners in the area proposed to be annexed (which is described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference) and owning 100% of the area excluding public streets and alleys and any land owned by the Town of Uail has filed a petition for annexation of said area with the Town Clerk of the Town of Uail, Colorado, requsting the Town to commence proceedings for the annexation of said area; and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk has referred said petition to the Town Council of the Town of Vail as a communication at a regular meeting of the Town Council on the 2nd day of August, 1988; and WHEREAS, at said regular meeting the Town Council passed a resolution making the following findings: A. That the petition for annexation has been signed by one hundred percent (100%) of the land owners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning more than one hundred percent (100%) of the area excluding public streets and alleys and any land owned by the Town of Vail. B. That the petition for annexation was in substantial compliance with the requirements of C.R.D. 31-i2-10.7 (1), as amended. C. That the Town Council had the necessary jurisdiction to proceed with the annexation of said territory; and WHEREAS, the Town Council passed Resolution No. 29, Series of 1988, and determined in said resolution that it should hold a public hearing to determine if the proposed annexation complies with Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., as amended, to establish whether or not said area is eligible for annexation under the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, as amended, said hearing to be held at a regular meeting of the Town Council on 6th day of September, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Building of the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk gave notice of said public hearing on the annexation petition in accordance with the provisions of 31-12-108 (2), C.R.S., as amended; and WHEREAS, the Town Clerk has received proof of publication of the regular notice and of the publication of Resolution No. 29, Series of 1988, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, that: 1. Findings of Fact On the basis of competent evidence presented in the public hearing on the petition for annexation on the 7th day of September, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., the Town Council of the Town of Uail, Colorado, finds and determines as follows: A. At least one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the Town of Vail, Colorado, the annexing municipality; the area proposed to be annexed is described in Exhibit A hereof and shown on the annexation plat which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. B. A community of interest exists between the territory proposed to be annexed and the annexing municipality; the territory proposed to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in the near future; and the territory proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the Town of Uail. C. In establishing the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed there was no division of any parcel of land therein held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate of two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, that has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowners thereof. D. The territory proposed to be annexed does not include any land held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, comprising twenty (20) acres or more (which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has a valuation or assessment in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,0000 for ad valorem for the year next preceding the annexation.) E. No annexation proceeding concerning any part of the territory proposed to be annexed has been commenced by any other municipality. F. The annexation of said territory will not not result in the detachment of any area from any school district. G. No election is required for the annexation of said territory under Section 31-12-107 (2). ~. The County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, by Resolution No. 88-29, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B waived preparation by the Town of Vail of an annexation impact report required by Section 31-12-108.5, C.R.S., as amended. -2- 2. Conclusions and Determinations Based on the findings of fact set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, the Town Council reaches conclusions and makes determinations as follows: A. The requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., as amended, have been met in regard to the proposed annexation. 6. No annexation election is required under Section 31-12-107 (2), C.R.S., as amended. C. The Town Council hereby determines that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the territory to be annexed. 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of September, 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -3- EXHIBIT A Lots 16 and 19, Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian according to the Dependent Resurvey and Survey of said Section as approved by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, in Washington, D.C. on September 29, 1975. -- _ W ~ REC'~ J U L 1 9 198 Exhibit "B" Commissioner ___~~i~`i~~G~_________moved adoption of the following Resolution: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION N0. 88-~~__ WAIVER OF ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT FDR THE TOWN OF VAIL WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the Town of Vail annex Lot 16 and Lot 19, Section 14, Township 5 South, Range B1 West of the 6th P.M. Eagle County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Pursuant Section 31-12-108.5, the Town of Vail is required to prepare an annexation impact report and submit such report to the county; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has requested the County to waive preparation of such report: and and WHEREAS, roads and improvements have not been installed on the property; WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has carefully studied the need for such a report under the particular circumstances presented in this proposed annexation; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE DF COLORADO: The Board finds that the property can be better developed as an incorporated part of the Town of Vail, and that such annexation will have no detrimental impact on adjacent properties remaining within the unincorporated area of the County. The Board of County Commissioners hereby agrees the required annexation impact report in this case is unnecessarily burdensome and therefore agrees to waive the requirement of its preparation. MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners o ~ the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the _~i day of ~ _. 1988. -- -~---- ~ ~ • , ~~ M ~: ,~~'~~ • COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF ~t01lAD~ COLORADO, Hy and Through Its T: HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS y ., erk of the and of George A. ates, Chairman ounty Commissioners __ ___ __W________ _ _____ Don d H. Welch, Commiss over Richard L.t~fson, Commission r ~~// , /,, ~ Commissioner ___ ~~~_______ seconded adoption of the foregoing resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Commissioner George A. Gates ~ ~ ~ Commissioner Donald H. Welch _ .~~ Commissioner Richard L. Gustafson ~ ,=?i This Resolution passed by ~eti'~/~'/?f~uS vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle. State of Colorado. -2- ORDINANCE N0. 27 Series of 1988 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A PORTION OF AN AREA GENERALLY KNOWN AS THE ULBRICH PROPERTY; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, on the basis of competent evidence presented in a public hearing on the petition for annexation of the territory more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, the Town Council made certain findings a fact and concluded that: A. The requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., as amended, have been met, and B. No election for the annexation of said territory is required under Section 31-12-107 (2), and C. That no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed upon said territory; and WHEREAS, the Town Council now wishes to annex said territory by ordinance in accordance with Section 31-12-111, C.R.S., as amended. NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, as follows: Section 1. The territory set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference is hereby annexed to the Town of Vail, Colorado without special terms or conditions. Section 2. A. A copy of the annexation map with the original of this annexation ordinance shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail. B. The Town Clerk shall file for recording two (2) certified copies of this annexation ordinance and map of the area annexed containing a legal description of such area with the County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County, Colorado. C. The County Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County shall be directed to file one (1) certified copy of the annexation ordinance and map with the Division of Local Government of the Department of Local Affairs. Section 3. Within ninety (90) days after the effective date hereof, the Town of Uail, Colorado shall impose zoning on the annexed area in accordance with Chapter 18.68 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, Colorado. Section 4. This annexation shall take effect in accordance with the Charter of the Town of Vail and the statutes of the State of Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this day of ,1988, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED THIS DAY OF 1988. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- CONSTRUCTION INI~UST~tY AR~ITF~ATION TRII~UNAL In the Matter of the Arbitration between 'f173iN OF YAII., Claimant -and EV3337ETT/ZEIGEL ASSOCIATES; AL COHEN CONSTRUCTION CO.. Respondents CASE NUMBER; 77 M110 0372 85 A"CirA~iD OIL ARBITRATOR- S WE , TH3~ UNDERSIGNED ARBiTRA-C'OR S .having been designated in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement entered Imo by the above-named Parties, and dated 9/20/77 and 8/17/77 and having beers du3y sworn and having duly heard the proofs and ailegatiaas of the Parries, AWARD as folIaus: FIi3l1I3dGS The lZesporYdents have raised the Colorado Statute of Limitations, 13-80-127, as a bar to Claimant's Demand for Arbitration. The Arbitrators find the Statute of Limitations does bar this act~.on by Claimant to the extent the claimed defect in the Ice Arena relates to water entering the roof. The Arbitrators further find that Claimant Town of Vail did not discover, and in the exercise of reasonable diligence should not have discovered, the bearing defects in the roof of the Tce Arena until July, 1984. The Torn of Vail filed its Demand for Arbitration in October, 1985. The Arbitrators, therefore, find the Colorado Statute of Limitations does not. bar this action as regards the bearing defects of the roof of the ICe Arena by Claimant. A~FARD The Arbitrators determine that Claimant Town of Vail should prevail against both Respondents an its claim for non-specification Construction. The Arbitrators award damages in favor of Town of Vail against .Everett/Zeigel Associates and Al Cohen Construction Co. in the total amount of $8,800.00. The Arbitrators further direct that the adrainistrativa fees and expenses of the American Arbitration Association shall be borne one-third (l/3) by Town ~f Vail, one-third (1/3} by Everett/Zeigel Associates and one-third (1/3} by Al Cohen Construction Co., and paid as directed by the American Arbitration Association. The Arbitrators cvmpensatian and expenses shall be borne one-third {1/3) by To~tn of Vail, one-third (1/3} by EverettlZeigel Associates and one-third (1/3} by Al Cohen Construction Company, and paid as directed by the American Arbitration Association. This Award is in full settlement of ail claims arxd counterclaims submitted to this arbitration. DATED this fro day of Attest, 1988. FORM C3C•D•3l83 GERALD HARRZSON, Arbitrator 1 r' J~J I PAUL H. PBNNER, Arbitrator - ,: .. DONALD L. PRESZLER, A itrator **~_PAGE . 00 ~~ lows o uai " 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)476-7000 office of the town manager Mr. Edmund Drager president Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Water and Sanitation Districts 846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657 VAIL 1989 September 13, 1988 RE: Street Improvements on Forest Road, Beaver Dam Road and Rock Ledge Road Dear Ed: This letter is just to confirm our conversation of last week in which I mentioned that about 50 sewer line repairs and manhole repairs had been done to date in the area where we are working cooperatively for street improvements on Forest Road, Beaver Dam Road and Rock Ledge Road. I simply wanted to broach the subject with you once more in case the Sewer District or Consolidated Water Districts wanted to reconsider the possibility of replacing more lines in that area before final paving is done. Although not paving this year would be a political problem, I think it would make sense to hold off in case further water and sewer work needs to be accomplished. I understood your response to be that you f~ required at this time had been accomplished water and sewer lines would be adequate for of street cuts would not have to be made in also stated you would check with your Chief points. slt all the work that was and the integrity of the the future so that a number the next few years. You Engineer to verify those Mr. Edmund Drager September 13, 1988. Page 2 We appreciate the cooperative effort that your Boards and your staff has made on this project. We know it has been a difficult, costly and time consuming effort and your cooperation has been beneficial. Sincer,~i~y, ~~ Rondail U. Phillips Town Manager RVP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council Mon., Sept. 12, 1988, Denver, Colo. Rocly Mountain News-~ Pena's 1989 budget calls for tax hike By SUZANNE WEISS Rocky Mountain News Stall Wrier Mayor Federico Pella this week will propose a modest tax Increase to keep Denver's operating budget in the black is 1989 and provide a little extra money for park improve- ments and street repairs. The mayor and his budget staff were characteristically tight-lipped as they met over the weekend to fine-tune the ;320 million-plus draft budget that will be submitted to the City Council on Thursday. But interviews with members of the council, business groups and neighborhood organizations with whom Peda bas consulted over the past month provided a rough sketch of his 1989 budget proposal. Among the major items: ^ Peda will cope with a projected;ll million gap in the operating budget with a mixture of cuts and new revenues. It wiU be the first time since his election in 1983 that Pefla bas built a tax increase into his budget proposal for the following year rather that relying exclusively on cuts. ^ The tax increase most likely will be sons-mill proper- ty-tax bike or a boost in Denver's "head tax; ' a ;4-a-mont4 levq on people who hold jobs in the city. Aides say the mayor remains opposed to a frequently mentioned alternative - eliminatingfree household trash pickup and imposing a ;8-a- month fee. ^ While a Petla-appointed task force recently recom- mended a ;26 million-a-year program for better upkeep of the city's aging infrastructure, the mayor has decided to put off that proposal for at least a year. He'll focus his efforts instead on persuading voters to pass a E150 million public- improvements bond issue early next year. ^ Pe6a will recommend some additional spending for maintenance of streets and parks next year. The city forest- er's office, for instance, will have a larger budget for trimming and spraying trees. ^ Some of the mayor's advisers are urging him to trim the city's overbuilt system of recreation centers and neigh- borhood health clinics, but Peifa is leaning against that idea and instead will order cuts in other areas. The key issue driving next year's budget, most observers said last week, is bow much of a tax increase Peiia and the council. think Denvetites will be willing to swallow. A large increase built into the 1989 budget, where voter approval isn't required, could imperil the the bond issue that city officials will submit to voters nest spring. In private meetings over the past few weeks, Pefia has sounded out council members and community leaders on three alternatives: Continued cuts in the budget without a taz increase, a combination of minor cuts and a modest taz increase, and a large tax increase without additional budget trims. The mayor heard some preference for the first and third alternatives, but the majority of those he interviewed voiced strong support for the second idea, mixing cuts with a small tax increase. 'The message he's been getting is that it's just not going to be politically wise to keep cutting the budget;' said Doug Irnkhart of Inter-Neighborhood Cooperation, a coalition of 40 neighborhood groups. "People are going to support some increase in taxes, I think, because of the concern they have about branch librar- ies, recreation centers and other services;' Linkhart said. As for the city council, it appears that a majority of the 13 members will be receptive to Pet3a's tax-hike proposals. West Denver Councilwoman Ramona Martinez seemed to sum up the mood of council members last week when she declared during a floor debate on budget issues, "I don't want to see any more services in this city cut - period.° 2nd place good enough for Coloradan By ROBERT JACKSON Rocky Mountain News Slatt Writer Maya Walker, runnerup to Miss Ame;ica, said yesterday she is not very disappointed that she didn't win the title, because she accomplished her goal. "My goal was to make it to the Miss America pageant," the 23- gear-old Walker said in an interview in Denver. She plans to return to Vail and continue her singing career. "I wanted to finish in the top 30 and to be on national television. It was disappointing to some degree not to win, but to some degree it's good. I got national exposure and that's good for me because I'm a singer. Not being the winner gives me the opportunity take advantage of any possible singing contract or offers," she said. Walker is a senior at Oklahoma City University. A MUSIC business major, she hopes to specialize in entertain- ment law and operate her own talent agency. She won the 1988 Miss Colorado pageant after failing three time - 1983, 1984 and 1985• - to win the Miss Oklaholma title. She moved to Colorado in 1986 to sing. "I really want to be an entertainer," she said. "But with my degree I want to represent musicians and actors and depending . how that part of life goes on with the business degree I'd like to study entertainment law. I plan to go to law school a year after I get my music business degree." Walker will spend the next year promoting and representing the Miss Colorado Pageant, she said. She will try to interest young women into participating in the Colorado pageant. "My schedule for the next year gives me the fexibility to work full time like I have been for the last two years;' she said "I go back to Vail and pickup where I left off. I hope several opportuni- ty will come to me because of the pageant " She came tantalizingly close to becoming the fourth Miss Cola rado to be named Miss America, following of Sharon Ritchie (1956), Marilyn Van Derbur (1958) and Rebecca King (1974). , LAST YEAR'S Miss Colorado, IaTanya Hall, was third run- nerup to Miss America Kaye Lani Rae Rafko. Walker was born in Okinawa, daughter of a black father and Japanese mother. "I've never faced any prejudice;' she said. "If my family ever faced discrimination, it was when my father was in Japan, and it was because he was American, not black:' As first ronnerup, Walker will receive a;17,000 scholarship and will assume the crown if the winner, Miss Minnesota Gretchen Elizabeth Carlson, is unable to serve.. ^ Miss America hopes to run acorporation/118 Maya Walker of Vail, who came in second to Miss America Saturday night, figures that just participating in the pageant will open doors to a career in entertainment: :. .. FRANK KIMMEL/Rocky Mountain News ,~-. ~- ~~~ ~Q .. ~~- ~. ~ ~~~ okc d,3~''7,u- ~c~"~ a~ ~ ?~cc, CGG~~~ Otrit~ C ;~,/ VAIL METRDPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT TREASURER'S REPORT FOR MONTH ENDING AUGUST 31, 1y88 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURE5 BUDGET - PAGE i ACTUAL 8/31/88 GASy SUhihtARY .. PAi~E 2 Vail Metropolitan Recreation District Revenues and Expenditures Rudget-Actual Month Ending August 31, 1988 ***CUMULATIVE~** ~**CURRE~IT PERIOD*** YTD AMOUNT % of 198E 1988 AUGUST 1987 ------ AUGUST 1988 AUGUST 1987 AUGUST 1988 BUDGET Rudget Revenues: -- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------- Property taxes °~ specific ownership taxes (Net) 28,812 36,896 33fi,534 345,144 65% 4~?4,360 Gulf passes 780 525 88,585 110,663 111% 100,100 Green fees 154,109 154,545 416,247 451,288 70% 648,700 Net Range 1,196 3,000 4,276 6,000 fi0% 10,Ot?0 Cart rentals 47,264 40,28b 135,789 129,027 74% 173,400 Clubhouse lease 2,750 2,750 8,250 24,750 75'/. 33,000 Tennis revenue 1.;,L64 7,901 32,422 28,525 85% 33,500 Interest 1,333 1,807 4,119 7,234 241'/. 3,000 Lottery proceeds 0% 9,500 Miscellaneous (2,718) 0 3,010 3,191 27% 12,000 TQTAL ------------- 246,790 ------------- 247,710 ------------- 1,029,232 ------------ .1,105,822 ---------- 7TI. ---------- 1,427,560 Expenditures: Golf course maintenance 35,250 34,975 184,499 196,111 fib'/. 287,743 Equipment maintenance 7,117 2,934 21,344 3fi,949 87% 42,700 Clubhouse operations 47,852 37,523 173,954 128,855 62% 206,275 Carts 0 0 88,336 304 10% 3,100 Golf course improvements: Irrigation project 21,629 4 69,055 75% 92,000 General projects 4,443 0 17,154 59,166 138% 43,000 Tennis operations 25,835 16,984 83,999 70,808 77% 91,650 General Administration 2,828 24,654 72,432 128,865 85% 152,465 Debt Service 99,237 ------------- 144,768 ------------- 329,896 ------------- 265,371 ---------- 59% 447,113 TOTAL 222,562 283,467 971,fi14 -- 955,484 ---------- 70% ---------- 1,366,046 Revenue over (under) Expenditures 24,228 (35,757) 57,618 150,338 fi1,514 -- ----- --- Reginninq Fund Balance 1/1/88 * 26,812 26,812 Ending Fund Balance 8/31!88 177,150 Ending Fund Ralance 12/31%88 88 ,,i6 *Includes X15,000 Rrnd Reserve Available August 1, 1988 Page 1 Vail Metropolitan Recreaii~n District Cash Summary Month Endinq August 31, 19BB NOW Payr~~ll - Account * ---- Account Total Reginning Balances 7/31/88 -------- 56,733 ----------- 114 ----------- 56 843 Receipts '33,916 43 233,959 Expenditures 1$76) !54,519) 151,395) Chec4cs signed 9/8/8$ (27,5$9) (27,589) Transfers for payroll - 154,519) - 54,519 4 Ending Balances 8/31/88 ------------ 211,665 ----------- 153 ---------- ?11,81$ * Average rate of interest 7.17% Page '~ RF7C~JLAR MEETT~ VAB, NIEIItOPOI~IAAN LION DIS`IitZCT AiK~JS'r 11, 1988 NIEt+~2S Pi2ESII~: George Knox, Gail Molloy, Ken Wilson, Merv Lapin Tim Garton N~ElZS AffiEATr: None OTHERS PFtESII~: Pat Dodson, Steve Thompson CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 3:05 PM. ~?~ OF NIINCtrF~: Lapin moved to approve the minutes of July 14, 1988, second by Knox, passed unanimously. FrIl~NC:TAT, REPORT: Steve Thompson joins the meeting and hands out his financial report (see attached). Garton asked if Dodson could do a green fee comparison of the rates and ntm~bers . Molloy arrives 3:15 PM Thompson reviewed the figures with VMRD. There were no further questions on the report. The Board asked Dodson to put together a list of all the activities VMRD is involved in besides golf and tennis such as tot lots, trouts unlimited, etc. ICE AREi~: Vickie Garnsey and Eddie Shipstad join the meeting. Pat asked them to attend and to explain to the Board their duties within the Recreation Department. Garnsey reviewed all the special event contracts, classes and programs offered at the arena and which of those programs meet their operating costs and which are subsidized. She also reviewed staff size for suimner and winter. The Board discussed various ideas of placing an outdoor rink for skating in LionsHead and a curling rink at the Golf Course. Eddie Shipstad reviewed all the upcoming special events he is working on attracting to Vail during high and low season. He also reviewed the groups he has currently booked to Vail. WORLD C~~ANIFIONSf~ - OPIIdIldG CEJtII~JNY Bob Knous, of Vail Valley Foundation joins the meeting.. Golden Peak: Knous stated VMRD will be responsible for removal of the fence, net posts and trees. They want Ben Krueger to transplant as many of these trees as possible. In May 1989 the Foundation will replace any trees removed or repair any other damage caused by the opening ceremonies. Dodson handed out the proposed site plan for Golden Peak of the opening ceremonies and a letter for protecting the tennis courts from Renner (see attached). Garton wants a letter from Renner & Assoc. estimating the maximum damage to the courts from this event. Garton also wants a Letter of Credit/Bond or whatever Jim Collins recorrnnends it will take, from the Foundation to insure the tennis courts will be returned in the same condition as they were received from VMRD. VAIL ASSOCIA'~ Joe Masey, Jack Hunn, Peter Patter all join the meeting. OPII~TIrTG CEl2II~NY (CON'T) Lapin asked if Vail Associates is willing to buy out VMRD's 86 year lease option. They will review this option. VA needs to know by September 1, 1988 or sooner if they should proceed with Phase I construction of Gold Peak courts 7 & 8 (see attached letter from Vail Associates. The Boat wants Dodson to get a contract drafted by Collins and sent to the Foundation to be used for the opening ceremonies. The contract should address insurance, letter of credit, estimated amounts of damage and plant replacement. Gail Molloy and Bob Knous will meet and review all the tree/landscaping loss. GOLD E~ PASS: Knous stated the cap was at 600 rounds in 1987 and 1988. 750 rounds were used and paid for by the Foundation (check has been received by VMRD) as per recent negotiations with Tim Garton. The Foundation will publicize VMRD more than it has in the past and offered them an ad in the Championship program. Lapin wants cross marketing for the stmnner and Knous to track down the bob sled and ski jump simulator, used for the 1988 Olympics. The simulator will be set up to show a summer Vail film during the Championships. The board and Knous agreed on the following VAIL A'1~' ~C A) Lapin and Knous will work on the Calgary simulator concept with bob sled/ski jump and marking sunm~ex Vail B) Knox and Knous will work on stories and opportunities for stmaner Vail. C) Knous will work with Steve Satterstrom to come up with a plan to limit the number of rounds used on the Gold Eagle Pass - possibly a time pass. PROGRAM (ADDITIONAL 1'I~ Garton indicated he has been working on the Vail Ambassador program. He has a possible candidate -Andre Fosel. He would like to sponsor this individual through the Vail Athletic Ambassador program. Garton would like the- Vail Valley Foundation to take this program over. RECREATION CiOIySOr.rnA~rON PLAN: The information is processing and should be together next week. Garton has met with Lapin to formulate a management plan and reviewed some of the plan with the Boan~. He will finalize this plan and get copies to the Board members. The Board wants to meet with Phillips prior to the report being published or handed out to any outside parties. The Board would like to discuss this topis at a special meeting. DOI~TIONS (ADDITIONAL 1'rEM): Wilson indicated Steve Simonett of the Vail Mens Club wanted VMRD to sponsor an event August 23-24. Wilson was not sure of the requested amount. Since Simonett was not present the boan~ tabled the item. SWIl~'fQIG POOL: Garton stated he wants to solve the RFP dilemma -which site will be used for the pool. Garton asked Jim Morter, Architect, if an RFP could state two sites. Morter stated it would not be impossible to look at an RFP with 2 sites without serious deficiencies.. GOLF REPORT: Garton will once again go to the Town Council and ask for a resolution giving the East softball field for the swimming pool. The Boarcl would like to discuss the pool issue at their special meeting. Steve Satterstrom joins the meeting. See handouts from Satterstrom. Satterstrom reco~miended the 1989 fees at the golf course remain the same except the lessons. Lessons would be raised by $10 for pro and $5 for staff. Knox wants Satch to work with the lodges in September to sell golf packages. APPROVAL OF PO'S: The board unanimously approved the Purchase On~ers. SC~~F'f7TtF. SPDQAL ME~atG: The board set a special meeting for SeptembPx 7, 1988 at 3:00 PM. AIITO[hB~Nr: The meeting adjourned at 7:00 PM Gail Molloy, Secretary