Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-02-14 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session~~-~- VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 2:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Selection of Council Volunteer for Swimming Pool Task Force 2. Discussion of Village Parking Structure Addition Preliminary Design Contract 3. Discussion of Air Quality Inventory Project Contract 4. Discussion of Public Information Officer Position 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 6. Information Update 7. Other VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 2:00 p.m. ~' EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 1. Selection of Council Volunteer for Swimming Pool Task Force Kristan Pritz Action Requested of Council: Determine who would like to serve on the Swimming Pool Task Force during the preliminary design phase for the Aquatic Facility project. Background Rationale: The request for proposal has been sent out to consultants. Proposals are due by March 1st. The Task Force will be involved with selecting the consultant and guiding the project throughout the design process. Other Task Force members include Tim Garton, Ken Wilson, Al Dorsett, Duane Piper, and Steve Barwick. 2:10 2. Discussion of Village Parking Structure Addition Preliminary Stan Berryman Design Contract Action Requested of Council: Authorize/deny Town Manager to execute contract. Background Rationale: Town Council requested at their February 7 meeting to meet with representatives from Michael Barber Architecture in order to clarify several portions of the preliminary design contract. Representatives from the firm will be at the 2/14 Work Session. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Town Manager to execute the contract. 2:50 3. Discussion of Air Quality Inventory Project Contract Peter Patten Susan Scanlan Action Requested of Council: Authorize/deny the Town Manager to execute the contract. Background Rationale: Air Sciences, Inc. has been selected by a consultant selection committee consisting of 2 PEC members and 3 staff members. The contract has been reviewed and revised by Susan Scanlan, Peter Patten, and Larry Eskwith. The project has been authorized by Council in the Community Development Department budget for $8,000 and is our first step in addressing air quality issues and policies as required by the State. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Town Manager to execute the contract. 3:10 4. Discussion of Public Information Officer Position Ron Phillips Charlie Wick Action Requested of Council: Discuss staff recommendations which will be presented at the meeting and give direction to staff. Background Rationale: Ron and Charlie want to discuss with the Council how to best utilize Karen Morter's former position in the future. 3:30 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Peter Patten 3:40 6. Information Update Ron Phillips 3:45 7. Other RECD FE®~ ~ 189 ~ T'R/aNSiV18~T~1L TO Date : ~9 Job No: ~ ~ Project Name: /D ~v~,, WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ^Under separate cover via _ ^Report ^Filters ^Equipment ^Documents: ^Copy of letter ^Proposal ^Samples ^Other COPIES DATE JOB NO. DESCRIPTION/TITLE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below COPY TO SIGNE Please notify us if enclosures are not as indicate 12687 West Cedar Drive, Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 988-2960 ^For approval ^Approved as submitted ^For your info ^Return after loan to us ^As requested ^Returned for corrections ^For review and comment ^ CONSULTATION AGREEI\/tENT THIS CONSULTATION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is dated this 3rd day of February, 1989 by and between AIR SCIENCES INC., a Colorado Corporation, hereafter referred to as "AIR SCIENCES," and the TOWN OF VAIL . ARTICLE I SCOPE OF SERVICES Services to be provided by AIR SCIENCES are described in Exhibit A "Scope of Work" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The TOWN OF VAIL hereby designates Susan Scanlon as the TOWN OF VAIL's representative for receiving any deliveries, communicating with AIR SCIENCES and authorizing all required work. Any change in this designation of representative shall be provided by the TOWN OF VAIL to AIR SCIENCES in writing. The Scope of Work describes the specific scope of desired services to be performed, the schedule requirements for completion of work, and specification of any reports, drawings or documents to be required, and a cost estimate for the completion of work. ARTICLE If COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES As consideration for providing the services described under Article I, the TOWN OF VAIL agrees to pay AIR SCIENCES an hourly rate amount shown in Exhibit B, attached, for each hour contributed by the various grades of employee therein described and direct expenses in connection therewith. Without revision of this Agreement, aggregate charges under this Agreement for all of the services specified in the Scope of Work, including direct labor charges and reimbursement for direct project expenses with a handling fee, shall not exceed a total of $8,000.00. AIR SCIENCES agrees that no other cost liability rests with the TOWN OF VAIL, and that all indirect labor costs of each employee including, but not limited to salary premiums;. worker's compensation, medical, dental, salary continuance, life or other insurance; and vacation, sick leave and holiday pay are the sole responsibility of AIR SCIENCES. ARTICLE III DIRECT PROJECT EXPENSES AIR SCIENCES' direct project expenses are defined as the out-of-pocket, non- laborcosts incurred as a direct result of work on the project. Direct project expenses include such items as transportation, meals and lodging while out of the TOWN OF VAIL; administrative costs for printing, binding or reproduction of consulting documents; and professional services such as laboratory testing and analysis or computer software access. The TOWN OF VAIL agrees to reimburse AIR SCIENCES for all such expenses after said expenses have been itemized with the receipts on submitted invoices. The TOWN OF VAIL agrees to pay to AIR SCIENCES a handling fee of 10% on all direct project expenses. ARTICLE IV PAYMENT Monthly invoices shall be issued by AIR SCIENCES for all work performed under the terms of this Agreement. Additionally, AIR SCIENCES shall provide the TOWN OF VAIL with monthly itemized statements of reimbursable direct project expenses. Invoices and statements are due and payable thirty (30) days after receipt by the TOWN OF VAIL. Interest at the rate of one percent (1%) per month may be added to subsequent invoices and statements with any outstanding balances more than fifteen (15) days overdue provided that written notice of non-receipt of payment is received by the TOWN OF VAIL and a subsequent ten (10) day period expires without correction- ARTICLE V INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AIR SCIENCES is, and shall be, in the performance of all work, services and activities under this Agreement, an independent contractor. AIR SCIENCES shall not act as an agent of the TOWN OF VAIL or its designated representative in negotiations with regulatory agencies and county, state and federal officials. ARTICLE VI PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AIR SCIENCES shall be responsible, up to the level of competence presently maintained by other professional consultants in similar practice, for the professional and technical soundness, accuracy, legality and suitability for purpose of all designs, drawings, reports, recommendations and other work or materials furnished under this Agreement. AIR SCIENCES shall be further responsible to exercise sound and objective professional judgment in reviewing the work of others. ARTICLE VII CONDITIONS It is further mutually agreed by the parties thereto that the TOWN OF VAIL shall provide to AIR SCIENCES all pertinent, available technical data in the TOWN OF VAIL's possession, including previous reports, maps and surveys or other information useful to or required by A-R SCIENCES in relation to AIR SCIENCES' work on the project. ARTICLE VIII TERM AND TERMINATION Unless sooner terminated under this Article, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until all services described in Article I hereof are completed by AIR SCIENCES. In no event shall this Agreement remain in effect beyond April 30, 1989. The TOWN OF VAIL may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to AIR SCIENCES. In this event, the TOWN OF VAIL shall pay AIR SCIENCES in full for all work duly authorized and properly performed prior to the effective date of termination upon receipt of an appropriate invoice, as defined in 2 a Article IV. Termination of this Agreement for any reason shall not relieve the TOWN OF VAIL or AIR SCIENCES of any obligation accruing or arising prior to such termination. ARTICLE IX ARBITRATION All claims, disputes and other matters in question arising out of, or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof may be decided by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Either the TOWN OF VAIL or AIR SCIENCES may initiate a request for such arbitration, but consent of the other party shall be mandatory. No arbitration arising out of, or relating to this Agreement may include by consolidation, joinder, or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this Agreement. ARTICLE X LEGAL EXPENSES In the event legal action is brought by the TOWN OF VAIL or AIR SCIENCES against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for attorneys` fees, costs and expenses as may beset by the Court or on appeal. ARTICLE XI INSURANCE During the terms of this Agreement, AIR SCIENCES shall secure and maintain the following types of insurance with limits as shown. 1. Worker's compensation insurance for all employees of AIR SCIENCES engaged in performing this Agreement as required by the laws of the State of Colorado, which insurance shall provide adequate and appropriate coverage for the performance of work in the State of Colorado; 2. Public liability coverage in the amount of $1,000,000.00; and 3. Automobile liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00. Certificates of insurance evidencing required coverage shall be furnished to the TOWN OF VAIL promptly after execution of this Agreement and shall provide that written notice be given to the TOWN OF VAIL at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or change in such coverage. ARTICLE XII INDEMNIFICATION A1R SCIENCES will indemnify and hold harmless the TOWN OF VAIL from and against any third party claims resulting from the negligent or tortuous acts of AIR 3 SCIENCES, its employees, agents or subcontractors pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement, other than any loss, cost, damage, liability, penalty, claim or expense that is due to the negligence or tortuous conduct of the TOWN OF VAIL. ARTICLE XIII COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AIR SCIENCES and the TOWN OF VAIL agree to comply with all legal requirements including laws, statutes and regulations of the United States or the State of Colorado applicable to the performance of the rights and obligations set forth in this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV COMPLETE AGREEMENT This Agreement, together with the referenced Exhibits, constitutes the entire Agreement between the TOWN OF VAIL and AIR SCIENCES and there are no other terms, conditions or provisions, either oral or written between the parties other than those herein contained. This Agreement supersedes any and all oral or written representations, inducements or understandings of any kind or nature between the parties relating to the work and compensation referred to herein. Amendments and changes to this Contract shall only be affected if agreed upon in writing and signed by authorized representatives ofboth parties. ARTICLE XV GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the substantive and procedural laws of the State of Colorado. If the parties cannot mutually agree to arbitrate this matter, then any action at law or judicial proceeding shall be instituted only in the Courts of the State of Colorado. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the date set forth in the first page hereof. TOWN OF VAIL: By: Date: AIR SCIENCES: By: Date: 4 Ir r, 9~1~81AD11 October 21, 1988 Ms. Susan Scanlon Vail Department of Public Health ?5 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 8165? Re: Proposal -update of air emissions inventory Dear Susan: From our phone conversation October 17, and your apparent need to compare what we propose to do, I am electing to write our proposal for the specific task Vail is seeking to have completed, which is the task of updating the emission inventory. The information we provided you in February was for more general purposes. I envision the task as specifically to define the emission inventory for PI~i10 particulate matter in the Gore Creek Valley. It will be done in a manner similar to that which we did for Vail Associates two years ago. The valley will be partitioned into four segments, the Bighorn area, East Vail, Vail Village and West Vail. For each of these areas the emissions of PM10 particulate will be estimated from diesels/ tailpipe exhaust, woodburning, restaurant grills and street dirt resuspension. Emissions will be developed by coupling emission factors with source activity levels. For instance, with woodburning, there are two sources, fireplaces and woodstoves. For woodstoves, there is an emission factor of 28 grams per stove per hour. This is multiplied by the number of stove-hours in each of the four areas to obtain the total emissions for that source. From our experience with the previous study for Vail Associates, we are more confident with the activity level statistics than the emission factors. For this proposed study, we will invest more time into improving the emission factors than adjusting the activity levels. Air Sciences will redevelop the sanding factor from more recent information: The vehicle tailpipe emission factors can be improved to better represent ahigh- altitude location and off-design operating conditions for diesels on the interstate, during braking and climbing. Since the particulates from woodburning are the majority of the emissions, this factor development will be updated from more recent laboratory results. ~- e'' Ms. Susan Scanlon October 21, 1988 Page Two Activity levels to be used in the proposed study (1987-1988 emissions inventory) will consist of skier-use days, local traffic miles, interstate traffic miles, the diesel to auto ratio, sanding quantities, wood consumption, and restaurant grill usage. Some of these factors will be ratioed from the Vail Associates study for 1986 by the change in skier-day usage, such as for woodburning and local traffic. The interstate information will be retrieved from the Colorado Department of Highways. Sanding data will be gathered from Vail street maintenance personnel. Vail Health Department personnel will be asked to assist in redeveloping restaurant activity information and this is the only need for staff time. Skier use-days data will be obtained from Vail Associates. At the initiation of the study, Air Sciences will request the Department of Public Health to gather certain information on the restaurant grills. The remainder of the information will be gathered by Air Sciences from the respective primary sources. Results of the study will be presented in a draft report to Vail and in-person to the the Vail City Council. During this meeting, results of the inventory study and possible mitigation measures can be discussed. Following discussion of the results, the report will be finalized and submitted. The study will take two months to prepare and this amount of time is required in part because of the delay in getting some of the Colorado Department of Highways data. The cost for Air Sciences to provide these services is estimated at $8,000. It is our preference that this be performed on a time and materials basis because of the uncertainty in some of the tasks. This proposal information is brief. I will be happy to provide additional detail if you wish it. Sincerely, Rodger G. Steen Principal RGS:bkc ~- ,. , ~XI-IIIiIT ~ t~I~, SC~ENCIJS I1~TC. SCI-III)UI.E ®i' CHAI~.GES - 1988 labor levels Support Level 1 Support Leve12 Assistant level StaffLevel Special Activities (tower climbing, testimony) Senior level . Principal level Il,ebillable >i;x enses All items $16 per hour $26 per hour $38 per hour $50 per hour $85 per hour $66 per hour $75 per hour Cost plus 10 percent Equipment Lease Rates Scientific computer Word processing Particulate filter balance Calibration equipment Meteorological monitor (WS, WD, T, SIGMA) with digital recording Particulate (PM10) sampler with time and flow controller No charge No charge No charge By project $1,900 - 3 months or less $2,800 per year $1,800 - 3 months or less $2,600 per year Invoices will be issued monthly and are payable upon receipt, unless otherwise agreed. A service charge of 1 ~ percent per month (but not exceed the maximum rate allowed by law) will be payable on any amounts not paid -within 30 days. Attorney's fees or other cost incurred in collecting any delinquent amount shall be paid by client. These quoted fees arc valid for 1988. Services commenced in 1989 or continued into 1989 will be charged in accordance with the fee schedule effective January 1, 1989. ~ 2is~ ~. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION February 13, 1989 SITE VISITS PUBLIC HEARING 1:30 PM 3:00 PM 1. Approval of minutes of January 9, 1989. 6 2. A request for a conditional use permit in order to construct an addition and a parking structure to the Vail Valley Medical Center. Lot F, Vail Village 2nd Filling, 181 West Meadow Drive. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center 4 3. A request for a zone change from Residential Cluster to Primary/Secondary and a request for a variance from minimum lot size in order to construct a second dwelling unit on Lot 2, Block 5, Intermountain Subdivision. Applicants William Pierce and Lynn Fritzlen 1 4. A request for side setback variances in order to construct additions to a residence located on Lot 3, Bighorn Estates. Applicants: Harriet and Robert McCue 3 5. A request for an exterior alteration in Commercial Core I in order to remodel the Sitzmark Lodge. 183 Gore Creek Drive, Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Sitzmark Lodge 2 6. A request for a conditional use permit, a variance for parking in the front setback and a site coverage variance in order to construct an addition to the Vail Mountain School. Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12 Filing, 3160 Frontage Road East. Applicanto Vail Mountain School 5 7. A request. for a variance to the number of satellite dishes allowed on one lot in order to locate an additional dish on the Vail Run property. 1000 North Frontage Road West, Portion of Lot 10 & Lot 11, Block C, Lionsridge Filling 1. Applicants Ciscorp /AIL-U.~. DISABLED SKI TEAM ~R~N~ PR®GAI~ Febrsary 6, 1989 Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Vailjunited States Disabled Ski Tea-n Supporter: RECD F E 8 - 9 1989 Thank you for your most recent support of the Vail/United States Disabled Ski Team during the First Annual Coors Light/Denver Bronco/Disabled Team Ski Challenge. For our first event of this type, it was a success and was that only because of the tremendous community involvement and support such as yours. We will continue to value. your interest in the progress of the Vail/United States Disabled Ski Team in the years and events to follow. You have been a large asset to our efforts in establishing a team training center to be based here in Vail. The training center will provide our team with coaching and programs designed to develop the United States National Championships, the World Disabled Championship Team and the United States Olympic Disabled Team. Thank you again for purchasing a Ski Challenge team and joining in the fun to benefit what we believe to be a much worthy cause. Sincerely, Margie Pitts. Vail/United States Disabled Ski Team Fund-raiser MP/kaa wail. Box 3225 i/ail, Colorado 81658 o~~s SA'/TEAM •~~/ ~ ~y Y La\ ~1.J171 ... ~. y''a.'i';.t t - .. ~~~ I he news that ABC's telecast ~ of the World Alpine Skiing 1 Championships blew away • its competition in Denver during the same time period Sun- day blew away Al Trautwig, too. ~ "It drew what?" said the man who will be behind the mike and in front of the camera this weekend, describing the quest of Ta- ` mars McKin• ney for a third medal and the flamboyant style of Alber- to Tomba. ` It's no sur- prise when Broncos foot- ball hits the 80- gar Mardn share mark here, but when a telecast of skiing rings up a 29 share, as ABC's did last Sunday, ' even the natives are impressed. Skiing may be a gigantic industry in Colorado, but whether it's avia- ble TV product is another matter. While college basketball on CBS was getting a 13 share and 5.4 rat- ing, and boxing on NBC only con- . nected fora 2.8 rating and ?share during similai^ time periods, ABC • swept through the Mile High City impressively ~ ~•'`,. , . y~ , - •. Though surprised by the 29 share and 12.6 rating locally, Trautwig :felt the emergence of America's McKinney as gold medalist in the i combined last Thursday helped..... , icreate interest. And when the men's downhill.was canceled Sat- Eurday, it drew more attention to • the next day's program. . Yet, nationally, the same Sunday ,',"Wide World of Sports" show from ;noon to 2 p.m. could only muster a 10 share and 9.9. rating, which was bettered by the Saturday telecast X19 share, 6.6 rating): So much for the nationalism theory. Still considered in its infancy, the production of skiing telecasts is still a mystery, "Television has a difficult time showing how fast they are going,"said Trautwig. "And the cameras can't capture the steepness of the mountain." Producer Bob Goodrich, who al- so handles the telecast of the India- napoliS 50(1. is Pvno.;.,,..-.•__ _ ... ~1/®s~rts this vmeeken~! The NBA All-Star Game from Houston and the final weekend of the World Alpine Skiing Championships highlight the weekend's~sports menu, along with a college basketball schedule topped by Arizona-Oklahoma and Georgetown- Pittsburgh. The three-point Long Distance Shooting Contest and Legends be-' gin at noon Saturday on TBS, with ABC Wide World o6Sports' coverage of the women's events from Vail at 2:30 p.m. on KUSA (Ch. 9j. The men's skiing Sun- day begins at 11 a.m. (® indicates events of special interest for recording) SATURDAY _ Tlme Ch. Event 11 a.m. Ch. 7 ®NCAA Basketball: Colorado at Oklahoma State 11 a.m. ESPN Auto Racing: USAC Copper World Classic 11:30 a.m. ESPN NCAA Basketball: Maryland at Duke Noon TBS ®NBA: Slam-Dunk, Legends Game 1 p.m. Ch. 8 Bowling: Florida Open { 1 p.m. Ch. 4 NCAA Basketball: Florida at Kentucky 1 P•m• WGN NCAA Basketball: Southern Cal at Notre Dame 1:30 p.m. ESPN Golf: PGA Seniors Championship ' 2. p.m. Ch. 7 ®NCAA Basketball: Georgetown at Pittsburgh `, ~ ~"~'r' 2:30 p.m. Ch. 9 ®Wide World: Figure Skating, /alpine Skiing ~ •' ~~"' `'~'•'• 3 P•m• ` ..~Ch• 4 Golf: Hawaiian Open 3,p.m. '. PSN NCAA Basketball: Utah at San Diego State ' ~ ~c,r~, 3 p.m.... ~ :,. FNN NCAA Basketball: Penn State' at West Virginia ~ - 3 p.m• "; ~. 'ESPN ~ Tennis: Euro-America's Cu •'~'"~~ 4:05 m: , .. P ` :• ~ `c'E: P• -TBS - 'Olympic Gold: Track ~ Field " • 5.p.m. ,~ •.;. M~.., ESPN ' • '®NCAA Basketball: St. John's at Syracuse .,'.... ~ •`-`~ 5 p.m.- :: =~ ; ,PSN NCAA Basketball: Nebraska >#t Kan. St. (tape - ""~'- ~'~: 6 p.m. •,. __,. BET NCAA Basketball: N.C. AbT a4 S.C. State _ P•n-• ESPN NCAA Basketball: Xavier at Wichita St. ; , ~;:..• _ , 7:30 p.m., , PSN ®NCAA Basketball: CSU at OralRoberts - 8 p.m. °FNN Boxing: Brown vs. Mamby (tape) 9:30 p,m. ESPN ~ • NCAA Basketball: Murray St. at Mid. Ten ~ • 9:30 p.m. PSN NCAA Basketball: Tulsa at Creighton (t ) •~ •' . • 12:05 a.m. Ch. 7 NCAA Basketball: Kansas at Missouri r 90 a.m. . • Ch. ~ - .~ Auto Racing: NASCAR BusctiClash '- _ '~ 10 a.m. ESPN Tennis: Euro-America's Cup t , . . 10:45 a.m. Ch. 7 ^ NCAA Basketball: Arizona at Oklahoma _ _ 11 a.m. Ch. 4 ®NCAA Basketball: UNLV at N.C. State ~ • 11 a.m. Ch. 9 ^Skiing: Works Alpine Championships 11:30 a.m. • ~ Ch. 49.. -. Futbol ` Noon ; : ESPN Golf: PGA Seniors Champlon~ p : ~ :: . Noon USA ` '~ Tennis: VolvoiChicago Final -~ - - 92:30 p.m.'- Ch. 9 ti1NCAA Basketball: Purdue a •hWfana .; :-;=; •_.~.; `:.R '~ ~'~, ' 12:45 p.m. Ch. 7 ^NBA: All-Star Game -- ~ . ~ r 1 P m ~ 1Ch: 4 ~SportsWorld: skiing renn~s ~. ~ 1:30 p m . ~„~Ch. 49 ~k, :El Mundo del Boil, ~ ~- `~~" ~°~.~r ~~ `, ~ 2:30 Pte= •; ~h..~ :Golf: Hawaliar- Open ~ ~ _ 2:30 p m ' ~ 'Ch. 9 .`~t"fgure Skating: U.S. Champioiishi ~,r • 2:30 p.m. "PSN - ""' NCAA Basketball: Duquesne at Temple " ~~ ` _ 4 p.m. -' +='FNN - . INCAA Basketball: Washington at Stanford -.. ° > 1<: ; • 6 P m ESPN NCAA Baseball: Stanford at Fullerton , ~~~~, s ~~ 6 P m tJSA - AICAA Basketball: Rhode Islan4 etlioustpn,°~.~,~ ' ;` P m FIHM ~~ ~ ;tVCAA Basketball: Tenn-Chattti~-t Mars3hali ~ ~ ~. Y 1 •OS p m~'~Ch ~ ~~ P1CAA Basketball: Tom MUler Show ~"t• ~~~~~~ at :: es on the skier coining right at the ~` camera and; at the precisely prop• er moment, switching to a camera that shows the skier going off- screen to the left. "He hasn't used it on the air yet, because it must be exactly at the right moment to work," said • As for the role of the announcers - Trautwig, analyst Bob Beattie - ...- and field reporter Mike Adamle'-': Trautwig would like to thiiik'gi. `;~-', - them as almost interchangeable ;~': parts. It is Trautwig's job to keep the action moving, but he aicn ,,_._. _ ~ almost by head.: ~ '', ~- `' .. ~ ~_ ~ ' ; "Sometimes the roles are inter- twined," said Trautwig. "I don't : " - . think of myself as a `play-by-play' . announcer so much as I do just a - broadcast partner of Bob Beattie and Mike Adamle." ..~. ~ - Whateverthey did last weekend; -:. must have worked, because nearly :: ; one of three Denver households:. •_~ :: with its TV on Sunday was watch= ' - ing -and presumably listening -:`; ; to World Alpine Skiing. .. ~; .: Which makes you wonder what - kind of Nielsen rating ABC mieht a TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Phillips Council Members FROM: Steve Thompson DATE: February 8, 1989 RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of January 31, 1989. We have finished our reconciliation of interest income for the year ended December 31, 1988, the results are as follows: Actual interest income 1988 $644,457 Budgeted interest income 1988 494,000 Over Budget 1988 $150,457 Actual interest income 1988 $644,457 Actual interest income 1987 556,865 Income in 1988 in excess of 1987 $ 87,592 There are several factors which contributed to the fact that interest income was $150,457 over budget including; collecting one extra month of sales tax in February 1988, the RETT collections over budget and an increase in interest rates. We have made the following purchases since our last report: Certificates of Deposit - Vail National Bank due January 26, 1988 yielding 9.25% FHLB Discount Notes - $300,000 due February 23, 1989 yielding 8.845% The average interest rate we earned on our open repurchase agreements during the month of January was 8.76%. For comparison, to earn the same rate we would have to purchase a 3-month T bill. Our goal for 1989, based upon the current interest rate structure and anticipated cash flow, is to earn between 8.50% and 9.OOo on our investment portfolio. There is an Investment Committee meeting scheduled for February 13, 1989 and we will be presenting the semi-annual investment report to the council on February 21, 1989. Please let me know if you have any questions. cc: Charlie Wick Town of Vail, Colorado Investment Report Summary of Accounts and Investments For the Month Ending January 31, 1989 Funds For Reserve Balances Percentage Percentage Operating Funds * 1/31/89 of Total Allowed Money Market Accounts (see page 1) Commercial Banks 5265,220 5209,743 5474,963 6.70% 50% Colorado Investment Pools 51,301,455 ----------- ----------- 51,301,455 ------------- 18.35% 100% ------ - Total 51,566,675 ----------- ----------- $209,743 ----------- ----------- 51,776,418 ------------- ------------- 25.05% ------ ------ Commercial Savings 8 - Banks ----------- Loans ---------- Certificates of Deposit (see page 2) Eagle County Institutions 5210,987 5210,987 5210,987 Other Colorado Institutions 599,000 $99,000 $99,000 National Institutions - $189,000 --- 5189,000 - $189,000 Total - -------- $498,987 ----------- ---------------------------- ---- 50 5399,987 $99,000 --------------------------------- ------------ $498,987 ------------ Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans U.S. Government Securities (see page 3) Repurchase Agreements Treasury Notes GNMA~s U.S. Savings Bonds Federal Agency Discount Notes Total 51,600,000 51,267,000 52,867,000 5230,000 5250,000 5480,000 $190,683 $190,683 516,008 516,008 51,262,934 51,262,934 ----------------------------------- 53,299,625 51,517,000 54,816,625 ----------------------------------- Total Portfolio Maturing Within 12 Months Maturing Within 24 Months Maturing After 24 Months 2.97% 1.40% 2.66% 7.03% 0.00% 100% 25% 40.43% 6.77% 2.69% 0.23% 17.81% 67.93% 55,266,287 51,825,743 57,092,030 100.00% ----------------------------------- ------- ----------------------------------- ------- 56,306,339 88.92% 5349,000 4.92% 5436,691 --- 6.16% ---------- 57,092,030 ------- 100.00% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 51,825,743 is reserves that the Town does not have access to for operation 2/7/89 slml invsm901 Money Market Accounts as of January 31, 1989 --For the Month of January-- Account Institution Balances Type of Accounts High Low Average 1/31/89 ------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- First Bank of Vail - Operating Interest 8.247'/ 7.199% 7.881% ------------------------------- ------------------------------- Balance $1,727,359 5361,071 $829,599 5247,996 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- First Bank of Vail - Insurance Interest 8.247' 7.199% 7.881% Balance '--°°-------°" Colorado Trust (Investment Pool) Interest 8.220% Balance Central Bank of Denver Reserve Accounts Interest 5.000% Balance Central Bank of Denver Operating Account Interest 7.895% Balance i $208,356 $1,301,455 51,387 $17,224 --------------- 1,776,418 --------------- --------------- 2/7/89 stmt invmm901 Page 1 Certificates of Deposit as of January 31, 1989 Bank Name, Location Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity Ins Coupon Yield ---------------- Date ------------ Date ---------- at Purchase ------------- Value ----------- ----- First ----- American Bank, Bosto n Mass FDIC 10.000% 10.000% 12-Nov-87 12-Nov-90 1096 599,000 Vail National Bank FDIC 7.000% 7.000% 01-Mar-88 01-Mar-89 365 510,987 FDIC 9.250% 9.250% 03-Jan-89 03-Jan-90 365 5100,000 FD[C 9.250% 9.250% 26-Jan-89 26-Jan-90 365 5100,000 First Service Bank, Leomin ster MA FDIC 8.750% 8.750% 03-Aug-88 03-Aug-89 365 $90,000 Centr al Bank of Denver Res erved Funds FDIC 8.400% 8.400% 05-Oct-88 05-Oct-89 365 $99,000 Avg Y ield 9.090% 5498,987 2/7/89 slml invcd901 Page 2 Government Securities as of January 31, 1989 ***Treasury Notes*** Days to Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Par Coupon Yield Date ----------- Date ----------- at Purchase ----------- Maturity ------------- Value ------------ ------------------ 8.875% -------- 7.470% 11-Mar-86 15-Feb-96 3628.00 2571.00 5230,000 8.875% 9.067'/ 02-Dec-88 30-Nov-90 728.00 668.00 5250,000 5480,000 ***Repurchase Agreements*** Days to Average Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Par Institution Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Central Bank 8.190% 12-Oct-88 Open 5148,000 8.190% 12-Oct-88 Open 5119,000 Prudential Bache 8.760% 20-Dec-88 Open 52,600,000 52,867,000 ***GNMA'S*** Years to Estimated Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal Pool Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5803 8.000% 8.480% 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 17.00 546,006 13003 8.000% 9.500% 24-Oct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 18.00 571,282 14659 8.000% 9.200% 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 21.20 19.00 573,395 Avg Yield 9.138% 5190,683 ***U.S. Savings Bonds*** Years to Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Maturity Series Yield Date Date -- at Purchase ------------ Maturity ------------ Cost ------------ Value ----------- ------ EE ---------- 7.170% ----------- 01-Oct-86 --------- 01-Oct-96 10.00 7.67 - - 516,008 ------------ ------------ 530,000 ----------- ----------- ***Federal Agency Discount Notes *** Days to Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Book Maturity Yield Date Date at Purchase Maturity --------- Value ------------ Value ----------- FHLB ---------- 9.084% ----------- 12-Dec-88 ----------- 09-Mar-89 ------------ 87.00 --- 37.00 5293,642 5300,000 FHLB 9.106% 05-Dec-88 28-Apr-89 144.00 87.00 5241,330 5250,000 FHLB 8.718% 17-Nov-88 24-Feb-89 99.00 24.00 5488,450 5500,000 FHLB 9.239% 15-Dec-88 Ob-Jun-89 173.00 126.00 - 5239,512 ----------- 5250,000 ------------ - - 51,262,934 ----------- ----------- 51,300,000 ------------ ------------ Total 54,816,625 r 2/7/89 slml invtr901 ~ Page 3 1\ rows o ua~ °'` ~ ~' ~ press release ~- d~~G relea$eda February 13, 1989 pages 1 ®~0 1 departmen~e Environmental health ~®~~a~~ pars®I~o Susan Scanlan The Town of Vail will be conducting the 9th Annual Smokeless Weekend during the upcoming President°s Weekend, February~l8th, 19th & 20th. The Smokeless Weekend is a voluntary effort which is conducted to increase the public awareness of the effect wood smoke has on our air quality and ultimately on our health. The event has successfully been held for the past 9 years. The main focus is to request the cooperation of all locals and guests in an attempt to refrain from burning wood from midnight on Friday, February 17th to midnight on Monday, February 20th. We realize there are individuals who burn wood as their primary heat source and would not expect their participation. The effort is aimed at the locals and guests who light a fire in the late afternoon or evening for the ambiance. We ask those people to refrain from burning for the three day period and observe the visual difference in our air quality. Many of us are familiar with the mandatory no-burn days which occur on the Front Range during periods of poor air quality. This weekend is historically a busy one for the Vail area and we ask everyone's cooperation to make our effort a success, Lodges should inform their guests of the Smokeless Weekend and ask for their cooperation. If anyone has any questions or yaould like more information on this topic please contact Susan Scanlan at the Office of Community Development at 479-2138. down of vail ~ 75 s. fronfage road ~ vail, Colorado 81657 ~ (303) 479-21313 . ...-~ _..~. = . -'~~` ~~~~ ~~~~ -'~'- ;^;i:E~; - -~~-_.K 04a G]aaMpd ~~]CoJG3~d~~O [~~~C3~aD THE TOWN OF VAIL REQUESTS YOUR PARTICIPATION IN A RETURN TD THE DAYS OF PRISTINE AlR BY ASKING THAT YOU NOT BURN WOOD DURING THIS HOLIDAY WEEKEND P - gib;, p ~ ~ ®9~TH a ® .. ~ ® ~ . D a 9 ~ TH ~ D © ® ~ _ p a a . ~ ~ _- d ~ - ~ ~ ^ TH 4 ~ ~ Q .. HELP US REMEMBER WHEN THE AIR WAS CLEAN PLEASE DON'T BURN ! FOR MORE INFO CALL 479-2138 „r. r, ~~ RECD ~E8 ~ 3 199 DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Case No. 87CV931 ORDER MICHAEL A. FRENCH, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF VAIL, RONDALL V. PHILLIPS, VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. THIS MATTER is before the Court for review of the action of Defendant Town of Vail ("Town") in disciplining Plaintiff. The Court has studied Plaintiff's Complaint and Opening Brief and Defendant's Answer and Answer Brief. No Reply Brief was filed. The Court has also reviewed the record certified herein, consisting primarily of (1) the findings and conclusions by a hearing officer on Plaintiff's appeal of his discipline, (2) the decision by defendant Rondall V. Phillips ("Town R4anager") based on the hearing officer's decision and (3) applicable rules. A summary of the chronology and status of the case discloses that Plaintiff was a police officer disciplined by Town authorities for disobeying an order to take an alcohol test and to refrain from driving for a stated period. He appealed. The Town Manager assigned the matter to a hearing officer who took evidence. The hearing officer recommended vacation of the discipline order. The Town Manager affirmed the fact of discipline but reduced its original severity. The essence of the case is that the hearing officer concluded there was no lawful order to Plaintiff, therefore Plaintiff's actions contrary to the purported orders cannot justify discipline for insubordination. The Town Manager concluded the orders to be lawful. The hearing officer's conclusion that no lawful order was giveri•is based upon his ultimate conclusion that there was no reasonable suspicion of violation of the following provision: "Personnel shall not appear for duty or be on duty while under the influence of intoxicants to any degree whatsoever, or with an odor of intoxicants on their breath," ~ 1.16 (b) Rules of Conduct. .The Town Manager found to the contrary. Facts supporting the Town Manager's conclusion are as follows; -. Page Two ORDER s~cy931 The Plaintiff re~.ated to Sgt. Layman at some time after 6:40 a.m. on the date of the offenses that he had consumed an alcoholic beverage about 10 o'clock the prior evening. He subsequently recalled that he had consumed several gin and tonics between 10:00 and mid- night that night. Plaintiff steadfastly refused a test for alcohol, over a period of hours during which there was much scurrying around by many per- sonnel deciding how to handle a troublesome situation. Plaintiff wore dark glasses on the morning in question. Despite an order not to drive-his vehicle, Plaintiff did sa. Lt. Mulson and Sgt. Layman believed Plaintiff to be intoxicated. They believed his breath had some odor. Someone thought it was 'of garlic. The Town Manager was bound by the edidentiary finding of the hearing examiner that Plaintiff did not emit an odor of an intoxicant, although there was conflicting evidence thereon. The Town Manager could have taken ediderice 'and based thereon might have concluded to the contrary but he did not reopen the hearing. Despite this finding, the Town Manager could none- theless on the basis of the other findings find that reasonable suspiciion existed to believe that Plaintiff was in violation of the Town's alcohol rule requiring Plaintiff to take an alcohol test. An order was then issued requiring Plaintiff to take an alcohol test. This was after a conference between Sgt. Layman, the Chief of Police, and Mr. Wick. Mr. Wick came from the Town Manager's office since the Town Manager was unavailable. He came "in his stead" according to the hearing officer's findings. The hearing officer concluded that this order was invalid because of his resolution of the reasonable suspicion issue and also because he concluded that only the Town Manager could order such tests. The Town Manager concluded to the contrary. The .Town Manager partially relied on testimony he had given before the hearing officer. Since that record has not been presented to the Court, these facts 'and practices will be ignored. Nevertheless, having struck those facts not in the record, the Town Manager properly concluded that the authority to order such tests is necessarily deligable. Mr. Wick acted Page Three ORDER 87CV931 in the stead of the Town Manager in this regard. Finally, when Plaintiff refused a second repetition of the order to undertake an alcohol test, Lt. Mulson at the request of Sgt, Layman ordered Plaintiff not to drive until 2:00 p.m. The hearing officer concluded this to be invalid largely on the basis of his resolution of the reasonable suspicion issue. Again, the Town Manager was justified in resolving this issue to the contrary. It is unquestioned that Plaintiff did not comply with those orders. The Town Manager did not exceed his jurisdiction or abuse his discretion in concluding contrary to the hearing officer that such orders were lawful. Discipline for insubordination was therefore. appropriate and the ultimate sanction imposed was not claimed excessive> The actions of defendants will not be disturbed. This action is therefore dismissed with prejudice. DONE this day of ,~. 1989. BY E~ RT Distr ct Ju g ... _ , '' CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing ORDER was placed in the UeSo Mails,,; postage prepaid and affixed, this day of /'__. 1989 ad r s / 1 c set tom: Lawrence Jo Eskwith, Attorney at Law Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 Joseph Ao Kiely, Esgo Edward P, Carlstead, Esge 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1300 Denver ^^'^r~a^ °^^^~ d ~ ~/Ll0 ~~~' r/ILLLL~~ (.d (/~.G~(,~l(/YI C~'N~LL-~C-Y?. RECD FE8 1 5199 NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES COfVIPANY February 7, 1989 President George H. 64. Bush The 6~hi to House 6dashington D. C. 20500 Dear President Bush: The imminent federal permitting of Metro Denver's controversial Two Forks Dam will be a good early test of your new administration's resolve to protect the environment. Governor Romer has reluctantly endorsed the Denver 6dater Department's application for a 25 year permit to construct Two Forks Dam. This project will forever destroy the nationally important South Platte Canyon and fishery near Denver, and severely damage the wildlife habitat in Nebraska. It is being vigorously opposed by all major, national environmental groups. The governor's well meaning intent is to use the extended permit as insurance for Denver's growth, while Colorado searches for a less damaging alternative. This unprecedented insurance idea is a clear abuse .. of the federal permitting process. 7t is also counterproductive because the 50 year momentum of the obsolete Two Forks concept has already been used politically to suppress development of a state water plan and several superior water supply alternatives. Unfortunately, the regional federal officials have been a part of the $40 million environmental study so long that they are about to approve the permit out of frustration instead of well reasoned logic. Instead of being lost in the details, these evaluators could quickly resolve the agonizing Two Forks dilemma by considering one fundamental fact. The massive environmental study is not a valid decision document because several superior water alternatives were purposely suppressed from detailed review t® protect the historical preference'of the permit applicant. The most obvious oversight example is Colorado's untapped Gunnison River, which is almost as large as the Colorado River headwaters that have already been severely dewatered with 19 diversions to Colorado's populated Last Slope. Two Forks will be the 20th. Several earlier Bureau and other studies have identified the vast surplus waters of the Gunnison as an ideal water source for Colorado's East Slope growth. However,,there is absolutely no evidence the Gunnison was ever considered in the studies, until our development company outlined the superior Union Park concept in our detailed public comments to the Corps of Engineers' Draft LIS. Since then, the Corps has largely confirmed our worldwide engineering consultant's (Lbasco) estimates that a ~0~ P.f). $ics ~,d;t] . i's~E,,:.,~ I r~;~~ r,';~.,r(n~,~ "~l~^3 ~ IS:~:~ ~tl irf~.3 1 . 2 large off-river reservoir at Union Park on the Gunnison side of the Continental Divide can increase the safe yield of Denver's existing system 40% more than Two Forks for about 60% of the unit cost. The Union Park Reservoir will also save the nationally significant South Platte Canyon, while providing much needed drought protection for Colorado's river environments on both slopes. Unfortunately, instead of considering Union Park in a Supplemental Draft EIS, the Corps chose to avoid an embarrassing delay by accepting the applicant's rationale that Union Park would not be timely because of "institutional constraints". Metro Denver's Arapahoe County now owns Union Park. The county's Preliminary F1?RC Permit Application for this advanced multipurpose water and power project calls for a completion date in 1999 -- several years ahead of the Two Forks option. The environmental and institutional hurdles of the Union Park alternative are minor compared to Two Forks, which is surely the most environmentally destructive major water project in our nation's history. The superior Green Mountain and City-Farm Recycling alternatives were also disqualified from the EIS for the same invalid institutional delay reasons. Because. of the obvious legal deficiencies of the Final EIS decision document, we respectfully request your administration's rejection or deferral of the Two Forks permit until the reasonable alternatives are properly evaluated. Colorado and our nation's public will be forever grateful. Sincerely, i~~~ r Allen D. (Dave) Miller President ADM/bm ce: EPA Administrator, Secretary of Army, Secretary of interior, Secretary of Agriculture; Governors Romer and Orr. - ~ 4 The Denver Business Journal - - January 16, 19$9 • ® e ~- I'~le t~l~t ®Il°t C~1~ j It's time to face Two Forks reality, plan alternative I he controversial Two Forks Dam project has ~ become the longest running non-event to grab ' headline attention in this region. The project, planned and fought over for longer ~ than a decade, still is no closer to reality despite the U.S. Army Corps~f' Engineers' decision last week to issue aper- ~ mit for construction. ~~ The limited, yes-but approval has a number of costly strings attached that could kill the project outright. Approval also is needed from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which holds veto power over the project 24 miles southwest of Denver and is leaning against it; the U.S. Forest 'Service; and the Missouri River division engineer of the Army Corps of Engineers. Even if these agencies approve the project. the restrictions likely to accompany the approval might be too costly and too restrictive to overcome. After all, what started out as a couple hundred million-dollar project is now estimated to cost upwards of $1 billion. Even if cost were no object, virtuall}• every environmental group in the nation has vowed to kill Two Forks in court. The project has become an environmental crusade that refuses to die until Two Forks is dead. But flying in the face of reality, the Denver Water Board, the suburban Metropolitan Water Providers and other Two Forks proponents myopically continue with blinders on down the yellow brick road of their fantasy. All alternatives to Two Forks, they claim..won't work. The standard objec- tion to most of these alternatives is timing; it will take too long to rethink and replaa Future water-supply strategy. The fact is, Two Forks is a bad dream -more than that, it's a nightmare that won't go away. But it needs to go away before metropolitan Denver seemingly will be able to politi- cally coalesce behind an alternative. Even Gov. Roy Romer has claimed Two Forks "ought to be a dam of last resort." " ;. There is no alternative to Two Forks because our water proviidas have refused to consider one. This blind, unthink- ing obstinacy does not bode well for Colorado's future. The state has an adequate water supply to meet future growth projections well into the 21st century, but to get beyond that point, planning must be done now, while there's time, for an alternative to Two Forks. It's time to face reality. ,. ~. P. 0. Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO. 80133 Ph. # (719) 481-2003 Iebruary 9, 1989 Colorado Legislators State Capitol Building Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Legislators: Senate Bill 67 should be rejected because of its hidden agenda. This bill gives the Colorado tiJater Resources and Power Development Authority the unbridled right to finance small water projects (under $10 million) without any additional state agency review of the project's relative merit. Unfortunately, the Authority was set up where individual board members represent individual river basins. The record shows that instead of statewide water planning, the board is primarily engaged in the study and approval of each other's favorite basin projects. Tf the outside controls are removed, individual board members could further abuse the state financing mechanism that has already been given the Authority in its legislative charter. Also, a $10 million ceiling only on construction is misleading because a large part of water project costs is for studies, permits, and financing. Instead of passing a bill that increases the incentive for Authority board members to think small for their own area, suggest legislation that specifically directs the Authority to develop an urgently needed state water plan which can be used as the basic guide for evaluating local, basin, and interbasin water developments. Sincerely, /~'"/ Allen D. (Dave) Miller cc: Governor Romer .d DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA FEBRUARY 15, 1989 3100 PeMo SITE VISITS 1045 PoM< 3 to Vista Bahn Ski Rentals Awning and signage Gold Peak Building, Vail Village (Final Review) TABLED TO MARCH 1ST MEETING 6 2e Vail Run Satellite Dish, 1000 Ne Frontage Road West, Portion of Lot 10, Block C, Lionsridge Filing to (Final Review) Motion-Gwathmey Second-Santa VOTE 4-0 With condition that the dish be removed if the tennis bubble is remov.edo 7 3o Wessner New Residence Lot 32, Block 1, Potato Patch (Final Review) Motion-Santa Second-Gwathmey BOTE 4-0 Approved as submitted and notede 1 4e Hughes Residence 250 Addition (Final Review) Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Village 11th Motion-Santa Second-Gwathmey VOTE 4-0 7 2 5. Vail Mountain School Gymnasium Addition and Parking Lot Expansion. Lot 12, Block 2, Vail Village 12th Filing 3160 Frontage Road East (Final Review) TABLED TO MARCH 1ST MEETING 5 6> Tufo 2nd Unit and Garage Addition Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village lst (Conceptual) 7. NO VOTE 4 8. Motion-Gwathmey Second-Sante VOTE 3-0 Approve location of garage for Unit A. Unit B garage to be relocated or redesigned. Vail Valley Medical Center Expansion and Parking Lot. (Conceptual Review) Holiday Inn Satelite Dish Vail Village TABLED TO MARCH 1ST MEETING MEMBERS PRESENTo Kathy Warren Ned Gwathmey Dan Leary Roy Sante Pam Hopkins (Final Review) MEMBERS ABSENTe STAFF APPROVALSo Graebel Residence - overhang Extension, L 9A, B 1, W 1st Council - FYI Mike Shannon, Larry Lichliter, Jerry Jones, and Kent Myers of Vail Associates have invited Council members to meet with them Monday, 2/20, 10:00 a.m., in the Landmark Lodge Conference Room. ~ 1 P1Y166 F$bfU ;.~s ~vd? .!?.~T,~ ~r.6rr ,~'I ~Y 9 _1989 ® 25-8 , .;~ ,~ .... ~. - - ~~ ~Y s week ,~ Dear Editor =~~.~,~~,~~`` ~~ .' What a sad commentary on !9spen's evolution this past forty;;:;} ` Years. Vail now gets the World ~ _=-". Championships while Aspen ; ;~., gets Gay Ski Week. Need I eay -~ :: more? .. _u .~: 3. ~ ~f l` ~. F, ~ :Steve Grey . ~ .~f }f ~~-,~ •~ r +.: Aspen Colo /'