Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-07-11 Support Documentation Town Council Regular SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 11, 1989 7:30 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. Update by the Colorado Department of Health on the Eagle Dick Parchini Mine Clean-Up Action Requested of Council: Receive report and make comments as desired. 7:45 2. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes of June 6 and 20, 1989 Meetings Steve Barwick B. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, capital projects fund, real estate transfer tax fund, and Vail marketing fund of the 1989 budget and financial plan, and authorizing the expenditures of such appropriations. Action Requested of Council:. Approve/deny Ordinance No. 14, on second reading. Background Rationale: This supplemental appropriation is necessary to reappropriate funding for projects not completed in 1988, to formally appropriate funding for the Vail marketing fund, and to fund additional capital projects as authorized by Council. The $140,000 of RETT funds for the streamwalk was deleted on first reading. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1989, on second reading. Rick Pylman C. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1989, second reading, an Larry Eskwith ordinance vacating a portion of a cul-de-sac in Intermountain, adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Intermountain Subdivision Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 16, on second reading. Background Rationale: The Intermountain roadway system was platted through Eagle County and subsequently accepted by the Town of Vail. The present access to Lot 1, Block 1, is a steep dirt track, although a road and cul-de-sac are platted. The steep grade of the undeveloped right-of-way is presenting a hardship to development of Lot 1, Block 1. Unchanged from first reading. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1989, on second reading. 8:00 3. Ordinance No. 15, Series of 1989, first reading, an Peter Patten ordinance allowing employee units in Lionsridge Filing #4 Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 15, on first reading. Background Rationale: This is a housekeeping ordinance to correct Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987, to allow employee units in Lionsridge Filing #4. Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1981, specifically permitted employee units on each lot, but Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987, upon reannexation of West Vail, imposed single family zoning without reference to employee units. Employee units were inadvertently left out of wording in Ordinance No. 26. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 15, Series of 1989, on first reading. 8:15 4. Appeal of the Design Review Board decision granting final Mike Mollica approval of the Cascade Crossing project Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn the action of the DRB. Background Rationale: The Cascade Crossing is a proposed single story retail center consisting of 10,270 square feet of leasable retail space. The property is located at 1031 South Frontage Road West, which is immediately west of the Vail Professional Building. The Design Review Board has granted final approval for the project, however, the Town Council has called this item up for review. This one acre site is zoned Arterial Business District, and it is the staff's opinion that the applicant has met all the TOV zoning considerations with this proposal. 8:30 5. Appeal of the Design Review Board decision granting final Mike Mollica approval of the Ledges project Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn the action of the DRB. Background Rationale: The Ledges property was formerly called the "Getty Oil Parcel"; it is located at the East Vail I-70 Interchange, and has received final approval from the Design Review Board. Council has called this item up for review. This project, as approved by the DRB, consists of six single family homes on approximately one acre. The site is zoned Low Density Multi-Family and has an allowable density of eight dwelling units. 8:45 6. Presentation of the 1988 Audited Financial Report Jerry McMahan Steve Thompson Action Requested of Council: Receive report from auditors and staff, and ask any questions you may have. 9:15 7. Discussion of TV translator vote results and direction to staff as to any future action Action Requested of Council: Discuss the TV translator vote results and give staff direction, if necessary. Background Rationale: The TV translator vote results should be available before the end of the meeting. Staff should receive Council direction that evening if any further action is to be taken. 9:30 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 9:45 8. Adjournment -2- e. i ti MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 6, 1989 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 6, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Affeldt, Acting Mayor Michael Cacioppo Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal was not present at the time the meeting began. The first item on the agenda was the approval of minutes of the May 2 and 16, 1989 meetings. There was no discussion by Council or the public. Tom Steinberg made a motion to approve the minutes, and Mike Cacioppo seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 4-0. The next order of business was Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance adding recreational amenities tax rates for new zone districts which have been added since the original ordinance was written. Acting Mayor Affeldt read the title in full. Larry Eskwith explained the reasoning for the ordinance. Mike Mollica noted the first five zone districts shown on the ordinance were the new additions. He then answered questions of Council. Tome Steinberg made a motion to approve the ordinance, and Merv Lapin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 4-0. The third item was Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 40, Series of 1988, to provide changes to Area D (Glen Lyon Office Property) requirements that concern the condition of undergrounding utilities; a new location for the bus stop; a deceleration lane on the South Frontage Road; a minor subdivision; and stairwell addition, The full title was read by Acting Mayor Affeldt. Kristan Pritz explained details of the minor subdivision. She stated staff recommended approval with five conditions: 1. The development of parcels A, B, C, and D shall be limited to the SDD 4 Development Plan and governed by the SDD 4 Ordinance as approved by the Town of Vail and on file with the Department of Community Development or as amended and approved by the Community Development Department, Planning and Environmental Commission, and/or the Vail Town Council. 2. The minor subdivision plat shall include a statement that development of the four parcels shall be governed by the approved SDD 4 Development Plan for Area D and Ordinance 40. 3. The Community Development Department and Town of Vail Attorney shall have the right to review and require changes in any "Agreements of tenants in common", "conveyance of Easement and Party Wall Agreements", and any other easement or ownership agreements related to the development of parcels A, B, C, and D to ensure that the four parcels are developed per the approved development plan and SDD 4 Ordinance. 4. Any modification or amendments to the minor subdivision conditions of approval agreement shall be reviewed as a major amendment under the procedures outlined in Section 18.40 of the Town of Vail zoning code. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for preparing the wording of these agreements for review by the Planning staff and Town Attorney. The specific legal wording must be submitted before the minor subdivision is recorded with the County. The Town of Vail shall record the minor subdivision plat, however, it will be the responsibil ity of the developer to cover any fees for recording the plat. Kristan stated the PEC approved the plan by a vote of 4-1, with Jim Viele abstaining. She then reviewed the five SDD amendments. She commented the undergrounding of the utilities seemed to have been worked out; Holy Cross rev iewed the plans ag<~in and decided it was possible to underground from the east end of Cascade Village to the east end of the Glen Lyon property. Ted Huskey of Holy Cross confirmed her remarks. Kristan next discussed the bus stop. The plans had changed so it would be located in front of the brewery instead of being farther west. Public Works was looking into the design and plans, and Andy Norris would be taking responsibility for snow removal, as well as overall maintenance of the bus lane. She then briefly reviewed the deceleration lane and stairwell. Kristan discussed the SDD design review criteria used. Kristan and Andy Norris answered questions of Council. Afterward, Kristan noted the staff recommendation was for approval of 'the SDD amendments with one condition: The developer shall agree to construct the bus lane per Town of Vail standards in the area of the Porte cochere. The specific design for the bus lane shall be mutually agreed to by the Area D owner and/or the developer, Colorado Division of Highways, and Town of Vail. The bus lane sha11 be constructed subsequent to the issuance of the building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for either the brewery addition, office expansion, east office building, or parking structure. She added the following wording to Section 18.46.210 D13: The developer and/or owner(s) of ,Area D shall be responsible for maintaining the new bus lane, including snow removal. If the bus lane is not maintained properly or snow removal is not adequate, the Town will not provide bus service to the site. Kristan next reviewed the ordinance and noted where the changes had been made in it, and answered questions of Council. She stated she and Andy Norris would work on the wording in the ordinance regarding the undergrounding of utilities; they would go to the five property owners affected by the undergrounding, ask for their participation, informing them of the cost; also, she would find out the cost of undergrounding Donovan Park for Council's information. Tom Steinberg made a motion to approve the ordinance with the minor changes to be made by second reading; Mike Cacioppo seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 4-0. The next order of business was Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance establishing the Booth Falls Local Improvement District. Acting Mayor Affeldt read the full title of the ordinance. Larry Eskwith called Stan Berryman, Director of Public Works/Transportation as his first witness. Stan was sworn in by Pam Brandmeyer. Stan testified the ordinance was for the formation of a Special Improvement District for Booth Falls, and showed Council a map of the area identifying the 26 property owners. He testified the district was being formed to install a rockfall mitigation device in the Booth Falls neighborhood, and that all properties on the map were located in a high hazard zone area. He testified notices of the public hearing had been mailed out May 23, 1989 to all of the property owners. Stan then reviewed the map and plans with the Council. He testified the total cost of the District would be $335,000 for the property owners, and the Town of Vail would be donating $20,000 toward engineering costs. He then reviewed the formula used to assess each property owner's share. Larry had his next witness, Ron Phillips, Town Manager, sworn. Ron testified he had received four written protests and two letters in favor of the District. Larry's final witness, Gerald Williams, a registered civil engineer, was sworn. Gerald testified he had been hired to study the rockfall mitigation and draw up plans so the hazard would be reduced. Art Kleimer stated he was representing the four owners of his lot who had filed a protest, and explained why they were against the district. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal arrived at this time. Jeannine Hallenbeck reviewed the chronological events over the last two years. She stated she was trying to address Art's concerns and explained why she just wanted to get the job done. Mr. Pat Baker commented the process had been ongoing for a long time; he owns property on both streets and wanted both places protected; the area's been shown as being hazardous, and he wants to mitigate it. Carol Acuff noted Jack Acuff could not attend, but he had written a letter to Ron Phillips (which had been copied and distributed to Council). She explained it was untrue that one area was more hazardous than the other, and asked Nick Lampiris to address comments made by Art Kleimer. She then referred to the letter in support of the -2- y district, and the two major considerations were 1) life/safety, and 2) removal of the properties from the current hazard designation. Ned Gwathmey remarked he was in favor of the district formation, but objected to the apportionment methods. Stan Berryman responded it was difficult to arrive at a formula that was fair to everyone. Nick Lampiris addressed the risk factor, and that he could not assign varying risks; the risk factor was fairly equal. Joe Tonnahill agreed the mitigation needed to be done, but did not feel his property was in danger, though he would have to pay. Ray Story then addressed the Council. He stated all the properties were in a high hazard area; the map Art Kleimer referred to earlier was a preliminary map only and not a finished one. Since then engineering studies and final maps had been done. The engineer told them mitigation for the Booth Falls Court street would be higher than for Katsos Ranch Road because the Booth Falls Court area would require fill. He suggested they all do it together because the risk was unknown; he might benefit from a neighbor taking the brunt of the risk, but he would help economically because the neighbor benefits him. He stated Council agreed to only get involved for two things - if it was a life/safety issue, and not a money issue; and if the engineer would certify the rockfall hazard mitigation so the area could be taken out of the high hazard zone. He did not want to wait for an injury; he wanted to proceed. Byron Rose, a member of the Board of Directors of the Mountain School, stated they were very much in favor of the district. Art Kleimer asked that the Town cover the open space areas, to which Acting Mayor Affeldt responded the Town had designated $20,000. Larry Eskwith gave a legal opinion regarding the district formation. Ella Knox supported the district. Jeannine Hallenbeck felt since only four out of 26 were negative about the assessment, the Council should go forward with the ordinance. Carol Acuff remarked she had been appointed secretary for the mailings to the owners, and notices of all meetings went to all 26 property owners. Joe Tonnahill felt he was being assessed twice, but would withdraw his protest if the assessment was refigured. After some discussion by Council, Mike Cacioppo made a motion to approve the ordinance, and Tom Steinberg seconded. Acting Mayor Affeldt felt since there were so few protests and Nick Lampiris stated all were at equal risk, he felt comfortable approving the district. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 5-0. The fifth order of business was Resolution No. 24, Series of 1989, a resolution creating a temporary Town of Vail Marketing Advisory Board. Larry Eskwith briefly explained why the resolution was drawn up, and noted a correction on 3.A., changing the wording to read "three members appointed by the Vail Town Council". Mike Cacioppo commented the composition of the committee was unfair to only have three appointees from the Town of Vail because of the amount of money Vail is providing. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal remarked she did not disagree with Mike, but supported the spirit of cooperation that was so important to this marketing effort and it was healthier. Merv Lapin also stated the Vail Associates members probably live in Vail, and if problems did arise, Vail could withdraw some support in the future. Mike disagreed and still felt it was unfair. Tom Steinberg did not feel it was inequitable because Vail would receive the most from the marketing efforts. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal made a motion to approve the resolution, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-1, with Mike Cacioppo opposing. The next item was Resolution No. 25, Series of 1989, a resolution setting the date for a special election to submit the question of the Town's participation in the Eagle County Television Translator District. Larry Eskwith said this resolution was drawn up just in case the Council wanted to set a date for the election. Acting Mayor Affeldt explained he was now comfortable bringing the issue to a vote of Town residents. After some discussion, Tom Steinberg commented he wanted to wait to set a date until after Council's meeting with Heritage next Tuesday. After more discussion by Council, Mike Cacioppo made a motion to approve the resolution. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal seconded the motion. Acting Mayor Affeldt agreed with Tom that the Council could wait, but felt it was not the large issue some thought, and therefore was comfortable with letting it go to a vote. Mike Cacioppo added he wanted the community to have the opportunity to decide. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-1, with Tom Steinberg opposing. Item seven on the agenda was an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission decision on new tennis courts and tennis pro shop. Mike Mollica stated Council called this issue up for review due to concerns over the sidewalk on the north side of the courts, the proposed Town of Vail bus stop layout, and the paving of the parking lot. He then reviewed the plans, and the PEC conditions for approval: -3- 1. That spotlights be installed on the eaves of the proposed building. 2. That the existing path south of the tennis courts be extended to the parking lot and be paved. 3. That conduit necessary for• permanent lighting be installed at the time of construction. 4. That the parking lot be paved per previous approval. 5. That a sidewalk be provided on the north side of the tennis courts. He noted the reason the UMRD was not proceeding with all four tennis courts was the prohibitive cost at this point in time. He stated staff recommended approval to the PEC because they felt the plans were in conformance with the Master Plan and zoning on the property. There was some discussion regarding the sidewalk on the north side of the tennis courts. Tom Steinberg suggested eliminating the paved section and the sidewalk for at least a year. Ron Phillips also noted that as long as this area was being used as a snow dump, it would be better if it remained unpaved. Tom Steinberg made a motion approving the project with a hold on the requirement of providing the sidewalk on the north side of the courts and paving of the parking lot until a final decision has been made on the construction of the last two tennis courts. Merv Lapin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 5-0. There was no Citizen Participation. At this time, Ron Phillips asked Council to address the issue of the July 4th Work Session and Evening Meeting scheduled. Since that Tuesday would be a legal holiday, he suggested they cancel the Work Session and postpone the Evening Meeting until the next day or the following Tuesday, July 11. Tom Steinberg made a motion to hold the Evening Meeting the following Tuesday, July 11, which Merv Lapin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 5-0. Acting Mayor Affeldt noted that at the Work Session that afternoon Council approved a supplemental appropriation to the road construction funds. He stated a friend from out of town had commented to him how surprised he was to find how well things worked here and how well things were taken care of. Eric felt this was refreshing point of view; somebody notices. Tom Steinberg asked why there was only a Colorado flag and no U.S. flag on the Information Booth flagpole, to which Stan Berryman responded they were waiting on a larger flag and lights before putting it up. Mike Cacioppo remarked he was opposed to increasing the street funds because he felt the business tax should be repealed and sales tax revenue used for marketing instead of adding to the street funds. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Eric L. Affeldt, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -4- .. ~ v' MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 20, 1989 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Michael Cacioppo Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: None Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The first order of business was an update by the Colorado Department of Health on the Eagle Mine Clean-up. Dick Parchini, the on-site field officer of the Department of Health overseeing the construction on the mine, discussed the health and environmental monitoring issues of the clean-up. After some discussion with Council, it was decided he would give another update at the July 11 Evening Meeting. The next item was a consent agenda of the following items: 1. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance adding recreational amenities tax rates for new zone districts which have .been formed since the original ordinance was written. 2. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 40, Series of 1988, to provide changes to Area D (Glen Lyon Office Property) requirements that concern the condition of undergrounding utilities; a new location for the bus stop; a deceleration lane on the South Frontage Road; a minor subdivision; and stairwell addition; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Mayor Rose read the full titles of the ordinances. Kristan Pritz stated Holy Cross Electric was still working on a letter regarding undergrounding the utilities, and once it was received, she would discuss it with Council at a Work Session. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the consent agenda items, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The third item was Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance establishing the Booth Falls Local Improvement District. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Larry Eskwith stated there was a problem, as there was a new engineer at Banner Associates, and he gave a different and higher estimate on the cost. Stan Berryman commented the item was going before the Design Review Board tomorrow, and depending on their requirements, the project could cost up to $50,000 more. Stan stated the problems with the district were: 1) the Booth Falls Townhome Association representatives were present and wanted to be included in the district; this would require the work to go 500 more feet and would involve Forest Service requirements, and 2) that portion would have to be engineered and a cost estimate made. Mayor Rose said he would rather table the item, staff could put it out to bid, see if the price would be acceptable to the property owners, and go forward from there. Jack Acuff commented he was disappointed to have come so far and the engineers make so large a mistake; he wants to go forward with the original amount quoted. Larry remarked the Town used the engineer recommended by the neighborhood, and what Jack wants would take longer unless the Town was willing to pick up the slack. There was some discussion by Council about why it had to go to the Design Review Board, and when the item would come back for the public hearing and second reading. Jerry Gravin of the Booth Falls Townhomes gave an explanation why the 18 townhome units -,r , . _. wanted to be included in the mitigation. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal asked why they were not here earlier, and can the project be phased? Stan replied a second district could be formed. Susan Fritch gave some background information on what had happened up to this point and how they were very interested in forming a district. Stan responded. Jack Acuff stated he would like the Booth Falls Townhomes to be included. Larry felt it would be best to table this item until the July 18 Evening Meeting. Merv Lapin made a motion to table the ordinance until July 18, 1989, which John Slevin seconded. At this time, Eric Affeldt commented that at the July 18 meeting, the Townhomes would not be included, and he encouraged the group to start their own process. Larry remarked he would help all he could. Ron Phillips stated yes, but the Town would take over the administration of the special development districts and notification of all property owners, so to take the burden off the property owners. Jeannine Hallenbeck initiated some discussion with Council over the upcoming process. It was clarified that staff would use the new cost estimate, put it out to bid, and notify the property owners; also, they would work with the engineer on substantiating the cost. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next order of business was Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1989, first reading, concerning the issuance of local improvement bonds for the Booth Creek Local Improvement District. Mayor Rose read the full title. A motion to approve the ordinance and schedule second reading for the July 18 Evening Meeting was made by Merv Lapin, and seconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Eric Affeldt commented he would support the motion, but was uncomfortable with approving blank figures. The next agenda item was Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, capital projects fund, real estate transfer tax fund, and Vail marketing fund of the 1989 budget and financial plan, and authorizing the expenditures of such appropriations. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Steve Barwick stated the ordinance had been reviewed at the Work Session that afternoon, and that most were roll forwards for projects from 1988, $200,000 in the general fund was for the parking structure, and that this money was not to be spent, but by law had to be shown as an expenditure. He noted $150,000 was for the streamwalk, and $414,000 was for street improvements. There was much discussion by Council regarding street improvements, costs, and the parking structure. Mike Cacioppo made a motion to approve the ordinance with amendments to eliminate $150,000 for the streamwalk, and eliminate $1,500 for an acoustic wall in the Library. There was no second, and the motion failed. Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve the ordinance with the exclusion of $150,000 for the streamwalk, so the total would be $3,173,881. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal seconded. Ron Phillips stated he would like some of the $150,000 to stay in for design costs. There was much discussion by Council, Ron, and Peter Patten regarding the streamwalk money. Tom Steinberg opposed the removal of the $150,000 for the streamwalk. At this time, Eric modified his motion to leave an amount not to exceed $10,000 for preliminary studies of the streamwalk, which Gail seconded. Mike Cacioppo stated his concerns over this. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2, with Mike Cacioppo and Tom Steinberg opposing. The sixth item was Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance vacating a portion of a cul-de-sac in Intermountain, adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Intermountain Subdivision. Mayor Rose read the full title of the ordinance. Rick Pylman reviewed the drawings of the cul-de-sac and property lines. He then reviewed the plans and reasons why staff recommended approval. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance, which was seconded by John Slevin. There was then some discussion by Council regarding the cost. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next order of business was an appeal of the Design Review Board decision to approve changes to design details for the Chester residence located on Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. The appeal was made by W. Grant Williams (adjacent property owner). Mayor Rose noted the process was to discuss precisely what was presented to the Design Review Board and nothing more. Item four of the Stutz, Dyer & Miller letter was the only item to be discussed. Larry Eskwith agreed, stating Stutz was dE~aling with the three other issues in District Court. Kristan Pritz and Jay Peterson reviewed the plan approved by the DRB and compared them to the new plans. Greg Stutz remarked the problem was with the design change of the roof, and gave details. There was much discussion by Jay and Greg regarding problems with the roof line. There was then some discussion by Council and staff regarding the Planning and Environmental Commission's and Design Review Board's charges. A motion -2- p ~ V to uphold the DRB decision regarding changes on the Chester residence was made by Merv Lapin and seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1, with Mike Cacioppo opposing. The next item was certification of election judges for the July 11, 1989 special election. Pam Brandmeyer remarked Kay Chaney, Lee Bennett, and Joan Norris were the proposed election judges. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the appointment of these election judges, which John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Under Citizen Participation, Gordon Pierce stated over the last 30 years, he never worked on a project that did not have changes. He wanted to apologize; things used to be "loose" and the staff has been working hard to tighten things up. He feels things are back in the right direction now. He stated he was not trying to get away with anything, and will work hard with staff so things like this do not happen. John Cogswell discussed the subject of public art, and encouraged Council to support public art. Kristan Pritz noted she was working on an ordinance now. Merv Lapin questioned where things stood on point of sale sales tax. Ron Phillips responded he would check on it. Tom Steinberg questioned how the Donovan Park reseeding project was going. Kristan Pritz replied the Vail Valley Foundation was supposed to get back to her regarding this; she was just waiting on their call. Tom also had a question regarding the snow dump land. Mike Cacioppo stated he remarked at the Work Session today the Town had $550,000 additional sales tax revenues. He asked business owners to go before the Council and ask for the business license fee ordinance to be rescinded. There was some discussion by Council regarding the pros and cons of this. John Cogswell noted he was glad to see the marketing going on, but was concerned about Front Range marketing. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- ORDINANCE N0. 14 Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, AND THE VAIL MARKETING FUND OF THE 1989 BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1989 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1988, adopting the 1989 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, The Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, that: Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations for the 1989 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: FUND AMOUNT General Fund $ 204,121 Capital Projects Fund 1,736,260 Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 611,500 Vail Marketing Fund 532,000 TOTAL $3,083,881 INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS 20th_ day of June 1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 20th day of June 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail Colorado. -1- Ordered published in full this 20th day of June 1889 Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Rick Pylman SUBJECT: Intermountain Cul-de-sac Vacation DATE: June 16, 1989 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST In early May, the owners of Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Intermountain Subdivision, Sally Dean and Larry Roush, contacted the Town of Vail and expressed some concern about their ability to access their property. This lot fronts on a platted cul-de-sac at the end of Larkspur Lane. This street has never been built to design standards, and in fact, consists of a single lane dirt track that accesses the property. At that time, the Community Development Department and the Town of Vail Engineering Department became involved and began to review requests for a front setback variance, and for easements to place retaining walls within the Town right-of-way in order to access the lot. After an extensive review of these requests by the Town of Vail Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Planning Department, it was felt that a more appropriate and practical solution to this problem would be to vacate a portion of the platted but unbuilt cul-de-sac. The area to be vacated was designated by the Town Engineer and has been reviewed and approved by all operational departments of the Town of Vail. The staff recommendation for this request is for approval. This partial vacation allows the owners of Lot 1, Block 1 to adequately access and develop their property. It also maintains adequate road right-of-way to meet the requirements of the operational departments of the Town of Vail. The Intermountain area is slated for a road improvement project starting perhaps as early as the summer of 1990. At that time it is the assumption of the Public Works Department that street improvements will be made to this portion of the public right-of-way. RP/bsc '~ ORDINANCE N0. 16 Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE VACATING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE TOWN OF VAIL IN AND TO THE ROADWAY MORE PARTICULARLY SET FORTH AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, a portion of Larkspur Court, a public roadway within the Town of Vail is not utilized by the general public; and WHEREAS, because of said reason, the Town believes that it would benefit the public safety and welfare to vacate said roadway and take the necessary steps to allow title to the roadway to transfer to the owner of the adjacent property for owner parking purposes only under the terms and conditions as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, 43-2-303 C.R.S., as amended, provides that a municipality may vacate all right, title or interest in a roadway by the adoption of an ordinance vacating any roadway or part thereof within the corporate limits of the Town; and WHEREAS, 43-2-302 C.R.S. provides that in the event that a portion of a roadway is vacated, title to the vacated portion of the roadway shall vest in the owners of the abutting land, each abutting owner taking to the center of the roadway; and WHEREAS, the abutting landowners of the pertinent portion of Larkspur Court are Larry Roush and Sally Dean. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, as follows: Section 1. The portions of Larkspur Court set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto are hereby vacated and shall be conveyed by quit claim deed to Larry Roush and Sally Dean (owners) subject to the following conditions: A. The Owners shall be obligated to maintain the vacated roadway and to keep it in good repair. No property described herein shall be used or occupied at any time for any purpose other than pedestrian, bicycle, and motor vehicle ingress and egress for the sole purpose of parking, and for the construction of a garage. B. No property described herein shall be used or considered in determining the gross residential floor area or density that the Owners would be entitled to under Town of Vail laws and regulations. C. The Owner shall be required to construct a gravel turnaround within one (1) year of the effective date of the ordinance which shall be sufficient in size to accommodate Town of Vail fire vehicles and snow removal equipment. Owner shall be e r' . required to grade the area, surface it with an all weather surface, and place an adequately sized culvert under the area for proper water drainage. All plans for construction of the improvements required by this paragraph shall be subject to approval by the Town of Vail prior to construction. Section ?_. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof., any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this 20th day of June , 1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 20th day of June 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 20th day of ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk June 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor -2- INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of ~ 1989• Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -3- ' ~ ~xh,i.b,it A ( fag e 1 0~ 2) Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, Inc. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING P.0. Box 409 ~ 1 13 East 4th Street ~ Eagie, Colorado 81631 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LARKSPUR COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION Eagle: (303) 328-6368 Metro: (303) 287-0835 Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot ly Block 1, Vail Intermountain Development Subdivision; thence along the prolongation of the northeasterly boundary of said Lot 1 N.84"14'46°°W. 29.40 feet to a point 10' from an existing sewer line; thence along a line 10' from and parallel to said sewer line 5.02''15'14°°W. 40.58 feet to a point an the right-of-way boundary of Larkspur Court; thence along said boundary 49.10 feet along the arc of a curve to the left with a radius of 45.00 feet, the chord of which bears N.4O''15°27°°E. 46.70 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel contains 789 square feet or 0.02 of an acre, more or leas. . ~,t, ~~°~ ,~ ,~ ~s ;~_ 7 1 cr 8 Date Surveyor's Noteo Steven K . Sc.e Senior Vice F~ Johnson, Kunk~~ .gam 20695 ident ® ~z-= - °~= eg. A g'cyc t o I n c. 'r,~;~`~ t L A~~,o``~~ The location for the sewer line used in this legal description has been obtained from topography mapped by Eagle Valley Engineering and Surveyingo Inc< dated January 5, 1983. JK/89/119 -- C' X r 5~ ~ n~ ~ U~` / i rt ~ ,Posed ~a~u~~~ N ~f~ O N d ~i d ' ~2 X w . 29 Q0 _`~ ~• 1pj.39 + aD ~J0 0 . ~ ^A b 5~ 0 ~ 1 ~ b A,~. 7 t . ~ p = 62'30'39' R 45.00' T = 27.31' ~ n 49.10' ® a 84~29~4~~ R a 45.00' . T fl 4o.ar L a 66.36' 0 N ~g i I- ~. TOe Planning and Environmental Commission FROMe Community Development DATEe June 26, 1989 SUBJe A request to amend Ordinance No. 26 of 1987 to allow employee units in single family houses in Lionsridge Fourth Filing. Applicants Town of Vail I. THE ~2EQUEST ~- Ordinance 26 of 1987 was written to impose zoning districts on newly re-annexed portions of West Vail. It was the purpose of the ordinance to apply the same zoning to the re-annexed property that had been applied in Ordinance No. 13 of 1981 when the property was first annexed. Ordinance No. 13 of 1981 specifically permitted employee units on each single family lot. Employee units were inadvertently left out of the wording in Ordinance No. 26 of 1987. II. STAFF RECOPRNtENDATION The staff recommends approval of the amendment to Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987 to rectify this unintentional omission. ORDINANCE NO. 15 Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 26, SERIES OF 1987, TO ALLOW EMPLOYEE UNITS IN LIONSRIDGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 4. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail re-annexed a portion of the West Vail area effective May 1, 1987; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1981, specifically permitted an employee unit on each single family lot in Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 4; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1987 upon the re-annexation of West Vail, imposed the Single Family (SFR) District on the Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 4 without reference to an additional employee unit; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare, to amend Ordinance 26 to allow for employee units in Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedures Fulfilled The procedures for the determination of the zoning district for Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 4 have been fulfilled. Section 2. An employee unit (as defined and restricted in Section 18.13 of the Municipal Code) shall be permitted on each lot in Lionsridge Subdivision Filing No. 4. The employee unit shall not exceed one third of the total gross residential floor area allowed on the lot per the Single Family zone district density control (Section 18.10.090). Section 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that nay one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. ~ Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any ' right which has accrued; any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior tc~ the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue. of the provision repealed or repealed and re-enacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of 1989, and a public haaring shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela P.. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1989. ATTEST: Kent R. Rose, Mayor Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ` ~ 1 -~ ' " ~ -.O1tDIN/1NCl: 130, 13 ` l'` ,. ---- - - (serics..of 19si) 75 s. i-~r~t:)c;~. rv ~(i ,~,- .. ~ .. ~ . _ .: ,: - tt~il, cu_ ail:~~-<_,~. £i 1.;57 . ~ ' ~''~•,'~~ `~~. ~, ~; '• ~.'.,,'}^•, .,: off;c(: ui ,lutial cCc:r;c ~, :., ~' `~:~.a'~•'k~~~'.%QI~~TI~.f1.i3~] - Iiti1POSIIdG ~~7_O~IING- DISTI.ICTS .ON 't .~~ ..;,, ,, _..?~~'~;.":" ' - ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~rCElti'l°°nIN.. '1]LVrLOhlll~:i1'I'S . L1N1)= P/1RCI;T: ' OI' PROPERTY 'I;`d ~`" ' ' ' ~ ` - ,'TIII:~: R1GI:N1'LY--ANNI~ZT:D 1~'EST NAIL ARLA; ACCEPTI::G - .~ ~ ~ .` , . ; ~?RIOR` I~PPlI0V~1LS OI' .'r1II~, LAGLE COUNTY CU;•1ti1ISSI0:~iERS - ' r- t- • II.h,LA'1'II\G` "TI1LR1;'TO ; SPI~CIrYING-.. A1I]~11D1IEN'1' PROCEDliRES. •. 4 • -~ SE1'SING I'OR'fIi CONDITIO~cS RELA'1'1NG '1'IIERrTO; A'.IENUItiG ~ ' "' ''`` _ :TIiE 'OP'I'TCIAL ZONING 1IAP I'OR ']'IIE TOIVN OI' NAIL: AND - ~ _ - . SET'.L`ING.- I'ORTII DETAILS IN RELATION TIi%RETO. ,,.. .. __ ,: . ,`~YIiEREAS, the .town of Vail, Colorado, recently annexed the Nest ~,... _ ~Vail~ area:, 'County of..~`agle, 'State-.of Colorado, effective on December- - _=_;1-, 19.8Q;_~~nd~-~~-~..:m.~~...- --~ _ IYIiEREI!S, Chapter 18.68 of .the :Municipal Code -of the ToR•n of ' - Vail sets forth procedures for the imposition of zoning districts on recently annex>ed areas; and - 14HIREAS, Section 31-12-115 (s) C.I't.S; 1973, as amended, _ ._-_ --- requires the -Tati:'n to bring the net~~ly annexed 1'~est Vai]. arda L1ndC'?" " its zoning ordinance within ninety (90) days after the ef~ectivc date of said annexation; and - _ - ~ ~- - ~9IiEI,,EAS, because- of certain aciions taken Uy and appro~-als of- - - -=~-=the ~~;-1e:County Cottltnissioners rclatin;; to .the within specii ied _ _`prop_ert~ies the Tot;•n Council is of the opinion that the zor_iilg - _:_ desl~iia~=on for these areas should recognize said ~:Lppro~~als and --: aoi~dris; and ~ _ - - - - -- -- 11'I1LP,EAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission of the To«'n of Z'ail leas considered the zoning -l:o Ue imposed on the netvl~: annc:;ed 1`Iest Vail area at a pu'alic hearinn and h;L, made a reco:nrtendatioll relating thereto, to the Totvll COUI1C11; ~-1:ci 11'IIIPLEAS, the Tott=n Council consic!(~rs th~t.t it is in the inl:erest of the pul)]_9.c health, safiety allcl tt•e]f(.,-e to so .one sa.ic! I~ropei'L~•; ... N011', TIIERLP'UliL, J3E IT ORD'tI~;Ll) I>~ TiIE '1U~~: COU\C7L G1? ~'rilE~ '1'01'~~T "`-" Ol~ V 11 I L, , TII AT : - _._ _ ...... _ . .. - _ _...---- Sccl'i(ttl 1. P~'ccc~(lut•c~~ Fn]i'il]ecl. ']_'ll(] I)1'OC:C!(llll'CS j C)1' t1lC C1C~:C:rlt1].1);l.i,.xi~ll O ~ 'ill] x'0117.11„ CI1St l'1Ct:i ~:O 1)l~ i.tul~(tti(?(1 c)u 1ali: nc:c':1;; ;tnttc~~,c~(1 1'~(~:;i: \':)-i.].• ;.7'c~a rte-; :;cal: 1'oi-th in Cllal)i.c~r y; ,(;,; Ol' 1.ltr V;(:i.a. 11ult:ii'.i.l);t.]. Ci)cl(~ ]ta~•~~ l~r.('ll .Ctt-l.1'-i:L.1c~l.I. ~' ' ': . ~` ..Sc.cl.ic~n '~ Ititt~c,r;i t:j.c,n c,f loth nr~l)i::l,ri c;(: c,n ('crl::~in 1';trccls anti ~,c,~~~c,:i:a <~T 1.1~{~ ttc~wl~ :iiinc,xc:cl Wc~:,l, Va.i 1. arc~:t.. Pursuant Lo Chapter 18.E;8 of the Vail Alunicipal Code, the. prohcrties descriUed in subsections e, f, g, h EL i. below arc a portion of the; ;~~ 1Vest Vail area-.'~lnriexe~l~'~to the-~'I'awn ttii•oul;h the enactment of Ordinance No. 43, Series~l`if ~~~80,`~of th~~ To~s~n o~ Vail, Colorado, effective on the thirty-first-=day^ of : D.eaembcr, _1960 , _ and hereby zoned as _follows a. The devel~~melits and parcels of property specified below in ~_.. Subsections e, f, g, h & i shall be developed in accordance tivith the ;:.----- prio~=~~-i.~eement -approvals and actions of the Eagle County Cor.^.missioners as" tfie "a~;reeinents, approvals and actions relate to each development or ^parcel of property. Vii-=The documents and instruments relating to the prior county approval:, actions and agreements are presently on file in the Department offCo:rmunity Development of the Town of Vail and said approvals, actions and agreements are hereby accepted and approved by the T~~wn of Vail. ~'c: AT1 buildings for which a building permit has not been issued, on the effective date of the annexation of Pest Vail shall comply with Design Revie:v Criteria of the Vail ,,fun icihal Codo prior to the issuance of a building permit . . a. The Community Developinont Deli^.rtrnent may issue staff approvals for minor changes in site desibn or other minor aspects of the flan for any of the: specified developments or parcels. These proposed changes may be appro~-ed as presented, approved r;~ith cO11C11tI0Ils or denied by tl:e Staff with an appeal withili 10 days of the Staff decision to the Planning and Environmcnta.l Comrai; sign, l~o>• major changes, sttch as "a redesign of a major part of tllc site, chal-tl;cs as use, density contr-o1=;==Height or o~;hor develol~ntcnt Strlald;irds, a Plannin and En~~irollnlcnta.l Cotrnilissi on .review sllot1lcl be rc~l.iircd. The procedure for chan~;os shall. be i.n accorclanc:e ~~°ith Clr;,.l~t:cr 1S.GG of the Vail 1~11IIIicil~a.1 Code. --------e:---- '1'11~~ -fE>):l cwinl; dc~~c~lc.~hmcuts ncl l~ci~°ccl.:; of prol~cr~~.y shall be sulr;jccl; -l:o ~:he l.crm~; oi' i,his ol•ci:i.n:lnc~i~: ( 1.) '1'hc~ V:t.a.7 cry , l'lt:I:;r.:, ]. 1 1~1'c~,t~~h (; . ('.r) ;il,t'ttctr Crc•c~lc '1'c~~:~nlic,tt::c•:;. (:~) Rl~~:tclc~~:~ (:r,~crl: C:<,ttclc~mi tt i taut::. ., • try.. - ~ __ ,• a,`• - _ _ /j v_ail_ _~_I11.C:ri11UU11Luin_ _Sw]~n and '1'cnnis Club. (5) Bri:tr P:itch, Lots G-2 , G-5 and G-G , Lionsridge Subdivision Filin6 No. ?.. (g) Cast Del Sol Condominiums. •. For' any zonitlg` purpose beyond the Is'al;le County Commissioners' app ' • agreements~or actions, the developments and parce]_s of property specified in this'subsection (e) shall be zoned Residential Cluster (RC). ,~fe Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 4, shall be subject to the terms of this ordinance. For any zoning purpose beyond the Eagle County Commissioners' approval, agreement or action, this parcel of property shall, be zoned Sing].e_ Fami~ Zone District (SFR) with a special pro- ... ~__ -- vision that an employee unit (as defined and restricted in Section 18.13.1 of the Vail Diunicipal Code) will be subject to approvals as per Section 18.13.080. The secondary unit may not emceed one third of the total . _ _ _ y ~<l Gxoss Residential Floor Area (GRF~) allowed on the lot as per the ! Single Fat:~ily Zone District Density Control (Section 18._10.090 of the Vail 1~lunicipal Code),, and Greenbelt ~: Natural Open Space (Gi OS) .' --- - g. ^Lot G-4, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing No. 2, has been the subject of liti;a:tion in the District Court of Eagle County, ar.d a Court order has been issued regarding the clovelopment of this property. The Totvn has further approved resolution ,`'S of 1JS1 in regard to a subse- quent agreement with the owner.. The Residential Cluster (RC) Zone District twill be 'the applicable zone on this property to guide the future development of the parcel, tvorLing within the bounds set by the Court Order :ind Resolution No. 5, Series of 1951. h. Blocl: 10, Vail Iiitcrmounta.iti SuUdi.vision and the rlliott Ranch Subdi~~i.sion, shall be subject to i.ltc i:erms of this ordinatce. For any ;~oninl; Purpose Ucyond the Eagle Coun~.~• Commissioners' appro~~al, a~;ree:- `mcnt or action, r].ccl: 10 a.nd t.hc L1].iot]: Ranch, shall be Toned Pri.mar~•/ :ieconcl~.try District. Lets 8, 15 F:. ]G of 131oc1; 10, V~ it Interi;~ottnt:.tin, shall l.~e zoned Grcrt~l~c:ll: ?;.; Nat.ur;t]. U,,c,n Sl,:tcc (G:~OS) . . 1.. V:l.l]. ~.Olllalrt-:;, Vail l)::.:; Sl~c:i,c: l~'i.litt;; i~o. ~, shall b~, Sul~jcc;t to T:hc: term:-; of tlti:: orc]a n:ttic.c. ]'cr~• :tny ::o>-:i_n,; l~;t.rposc hc:~~c~tid 1 ltc~~ ];a(;]C'. ~-(?lln~\' ~:C~l'.1111J:;::.1c~11C:1'' :17i1'C`('1:1!•)11., :L1?j~]'c)~':1.1. i):` :LCt1011, ~';l:i]. ~~~~lla'.~~~Il~;• :,ha ] 1 l~c~ ;;c.~nc,ci C~:,;nmcrru i :ia. C'c~r, 11 ]: (('('l ]' X) . f A~ ~uw~ u 75 south frontag®road veil, Colorado 81857 (303) 479-2113 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Rose Vail Town Council FROM: Finance Staff DATE: July 7, 1989 REe Management Letter A copy of the management letter from our 1988 audit is enclosed for your informationo Jerry McMahan from McMahan, Armstrong and Associates, and staff, will be presenting the audit and answering any questions at the July 11th Council meeting, Enclosure IVICI~AHAN, ARMSTRONG ~ ASSOCIATES, P.C. Certified Public Accountants o Suite 207 Nail National Bank Building/108 S. Frontage Road/P.O. Box 999Nail, Colorado 81658 0 303'476'2277 Mayor and Town Council Town of Vail Vail, Colorado 81658 In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the Town of Vail, Colorado ("The Town") for the year ended December 31, 1988, we considered the Town's internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. However, during our audit we became aware of the following matters that are opportunities for strengthening internal controls and operating efficiency. The following summarize our comments and suggestions regarding those matters: Internal Control Structure Matters: 1. Budget: A. The budget revisions were not updated in the computer for some of the ,Town°s funds. We recommend budget revisions be reconciled periodically to the computer data. B. A budget amendment for the Special Parking Assessment Fund was not formally approved by the Council, This caused the fund to be over budget for 1988. 2. Investment Policy: The following violations of the Town's investment policy were noted: A. A Merrill Lynch account was used for a limited number of transactions in 1988. The account was used to transfer investment purchases on the same day. The account was not FDIC or FSLIC insured, however, there was no exposure to loss at any time because the account was SPIC insured. Donald J. McMahan, C.P.A. Andrew W. Armstrong, C.P.A. Stephanie L. Novosad, C.P.A. Members of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants s „~ Mayor and Town Council Town of Vail Page 2 B. The balance in Colotrust exceeded $2,000,000 from 3/25/88 to 10/7/88. The Town's policy was to limit the investment to $2,000,000. The Council approved this increase in the limit and the policy was amended November 15, 1988. Other Matters 1. Fixed Assets The Town is implementing an in-house computer system to manage fixed assets. The following matters should be reviewed: A. Assets acquired with Federal grants should be identified. In the event an asset acquired with Federal grants is sold, the proceeds may have to be refunded to the Federal government. B. The department heads should be responsible for identifying all additions and deletions to each departments° fixed asset listing. A11 deletions should be documented. C. The Town should adopt a written fixed asset capitalization policy with a dollar limit. 2. UMTA Grant We suggest the Town conduct a review of the UMTA grant general and specific requirements and an in-house review of these requirements be conducted. We will be pleased to discuss these matters with you. Very truly yours, ~C1~,be.~a~,~vw.~a a~1~~~ ~'C. McMahan, Armstrong & Associates, P.C. June 6, 1989 fl (For immediate release) June 26, 1989 MINTURN--The contents of two crushed drums found during Eagle Mine cleanup operations June 2 are primarily oil and grease along with low concentrations of solvents, according to results of preliminary lab tests provided to the Colorado Department of Health. The drums were discovered during construction of a culvert at the mouth of Rock Creek, according to Dick Parachini, on-site coordinator for the Health Department's Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division, in charge of overseeing cleanup activities at the Eagle Mine. He said workers isolated and contained the site, allowing construction activities to continue in the general area. The Colorado Department of Health and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will oversee the removal, transportation and disposal of the drums. Dames and Moore, an environmental consultant hired by Gulf and Western, will develop and submit a detailed drum cleanup plan for the Health Department's review and approval before any work begins. For further information, call Dick Parachini at (303) 827-5928. ---30--- 0 _, r ~T~rE of coLOr~o COLORADO DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH 421 U East 11th Avenue Uem'er. Colorado 8U22U Phone (303) 32U-8333 "tEMORANDt?~] T0: Interested Parties FROA1: Dick Parachini - Eagle Mine On-Site Coordinator DATE: June 23, 1989 ~ - ~~ is', .. I:uv homrr C,uorrnur 1 h(rme• ,~1. Vrvnun. X1.1 ). t.tE(lrllV f' t)irf'(~nr SUBJECT: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results - P1a~- 1989 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program during the 1989 construction season. The airborne particulate data shown in the accompa.rrying table are preliminary in nature. This means that the values, particularly the metal levels, may be revised after auditing and validation by the air contractor and the state. The information is useful in assessing emissions and subsequent dust control during construction, as well as trends in potential human exvosure. In addition to the May summary, data for June 3, 1989 is also available: June 3, 1989 TSP 94.2 ug/m3 Lead .487 ug/m3 Arsenic .245 ug/m3 Cadmium .011 ug/m3 PM10 48.3 ug/m3 The Colorado Department of Health received. anlaytical results reports that indicate the occurrence of 24-hour average air concentrations of arsenic or cadmium in excess of the air monitoring program trigger values. The (These) dates of occurrence were May 10, May 22, (and) May 31, and June 3, 1989, and all were recorded at North/Cross Creek air monitoring station. The trigger value for both arsenic and cadmium is 0.01 ug/m3. This trigger value is set at a level slightly above the instrument detection limit that provides an accurate, quantifiable measurement of arsenic and cadmium. The permit levels for TSP (total suspended particulates) and Pb (lead) were not exceeded during (May 1989) this same time period. The values observed for arsenic during May and early June of 1989 were the highest observed to date. An evaluation of the Minturn Middle School and Maloit Park monitoring data by a state toxicologist indicates that an increased level of concern related to the levels and frequency of arsenic observations is appropriate. The state toxicologist feels that these elevated airborne concentrations make too great a contribution to the potential average chronic ex-gosure in the populated areas ac~iacent to the Eagle facility. A permit reauiring increased dust control measures ~~as strengthened on June 2 and implemented on June ~, 198. The state will be na~•in~ verb- close attention to air quality-, in general,. and fugitive dust control, in particular, during the remainder of June. If this trend continues, the state Department of Health will take appropriate measures to enforce fugitive dust controls to ensure public health and safet~r. For further information, please contact Dick Parachini at 827-928 or rlil:e P1cHu~h 331-48.5. /c. f .. . r AIRBORNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS EAGLE MINE SITE MAY 1989 (u9/m3) Date SCHOOL SITE Sampled TSP~ Pb*~ As Cd PM10 05/04/89 11.9 <0.004 <0.002 <0.009 9.7 05/07/89 14.5 <0.004 0.006 <0.009 9.7 05/10/89 18.8 0.005 <0.002 <0.009 10.0 05/13/89 18.9 <0.004 <0.002 <0.009 9.9 05/16/89 17.3 <0.004 <0.002 <0.009 13.1 05/19/89 41.6 <0.004 0.007 <0.009 24.0 05/22/89 20.2 <0.004 0.005 <0.009 10.5 05/25/89 22.7 <0.004 0.003 <0.009 6.9 05/28/89 21.4 <0.004 <0.002 <0.009 9.4 05/31/89 33.7 <0.004 0.005 <0.009 13.3 ~ = Permit Limitation 150 ug/m3 ~ =Permit limitation 1.5 ug/m3 NORTH/CROSS CREEK SITE TSP~ Pb~~ As Cd PM10 11.1 <0.004 <0.002 <0.009 10,3 20.5 <0.004 0.005 <0.009 13.9 85.9 0.413 0.208 0.034 38.2. 24.7 <0.004 0.007 <0.009 13,1 15.7 <0.004 0.003 <0.009 13.1 36.1 <0.004 0.005 <0.009 25„7 22.1 0.005 0.003 0.012 16.7 22.9 0.009 <0.002 <0.008 10,8 28.2 0.011 0.005 <0.012 12.5 37.8 0.006 <0.002 0.013 16.3 THESE DATA ARE PROVISIONAL AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER AUDITING AND VALIDATION Dames & Moore 1626 Cole Boulevard Golden9 CO 80401 (303) 232-6262 ,.. a 4 VAIL COMMUNITY MEETING 06-28-89 TOM JACOBSON - First year he received survey - People who live on his street who are not voters should receive the survey - Complaints about Police Dept. -- Indy 500 -- coming out now but at the wrong times. - Mail survey to property owner - New bridge by sanitation dept. on Forest Road -- speeders FLO STEINBERG - Air pollution, gravel on roads, fireplaces - Chemical pollution -- spraying shoulders while people were walking -- no spraying at all - defoliated lilac bushes by neighbor spraying dandelions. TOV should address indiscriminate spraying on private property and on shoulders of the roads. JACK CURTAIN - #1 priority is to maintain what we have. We are not maintaining old projects -- Seibert Circle needs attention - Founders Plaza is now getting some maintenance - flower beds at Pirate Ship Park are gone. ALLEN KNOX - Police need more direction for issuing more warnings. Patrol more, more visible, more on bicycles, encourage them to not be as heavy handed. - Bottom of Vail Pass in median - welcome to Vail sign at Eagle- Vai1 or Dowd Junction area. Landscaped. - Charge for parking all year long. BOB KNOUS - Good lower bench of Ford Park 1 ~r a 4 KENT ROSE - Go to Redcliff for a day -- Public Works - Affordable housing, parking, transportation RAY KENNEDY - Gateway Project - what is happening? Peter explained. MIKE CACIOPPO - Buy Amoco site? JIM LAMONT - Art museum where ski museum is. Redo of zoning ordinance? Is that happening? Vail Village Master Plan. - Kudos to Council regarding their fiscal responsibility. PETER JAMAR - Matching funds to condo association for landscaping, parking, etc. GAIL WAHRLICH-LOWENTHAL - Question for survey; what about 4-way stop? Is it working; are there still problems; how is the manual traffic control working? BOB O°MALLEY -- EAGLE-NAIL - Put officer at 4-way on 204 foot blocks and dress him like they do in Bermuda. We .need more available parking in Vail. Council should begin making plans to provide bus service county-wide, or at the least, as far as the Edwards area. CISSY DOBSON - Parking closer together in structures with attendants. - In order to improve Council in eyes of the public, increase visibility with televising work sessions as well. KAREN MORTER - Use post office facility for a combined Chamber of Commerce/VRA/ Visitor°s Center. p UNNAMED OTHERS - Allocation for business license fee - Snow dump? VA solution to north and west of Town Shop. - No parking spaces. Need more bus service to Eagle-Vail. Tourism #1 project. - More police security; video cameras in parking structures; mobile cart. - Shuttle for ambulatory in Ford Park. - Council needs to work at making the County more responsive to us. We need a game plan. Has the Council looked at annexing Eagle-Vail? Anything further west? 3 tawo 0 75 south 4rontag® Poac9 bail, Colorado 89 657 (303) 479-29 58 d®partm®nt of public v~rorics/transportation T0: Ron Phillips FROM: Skip Gordon DATE: July 3, 1989 RE: 1989 Ridership Compared to 1988 TM VL ~9~9 Below are the statistics showing total ridership for 1989 compared to that of 1988 for the month of JUNE. INTOWN EAST VAIL WEST VAIL SANDSTONE 1988 63,471 2,000 2,997 678 1989 76,647 2,169 3,338 640 Difference 13,176 169 341 38 21 o UP 8% UP 11 o UP 6 o DOWN Grand Total - Intown, E. Vail, W. Vail ~ Sandstone - 1988 69,146 Grand Total - Intown, E. Vail, W. Vail F, Sandstone - 1989 82,794 Difference 13,648 20o UP SG/slh cc: Charlie Wick Stan Berryman lawn of uaf 75 sou4h gron4sg®road vall, Colorado 89 657 (303) 479-29 9 3 MEMORANDUM TOe Mayor Rose Vail Town Council F'ROMB Charles Wick ~q?,v/ DATEo July 7, 1989 REt Town of Vail Personnel Rules and Regulations The Town of Vail Personnel Rules and Regulations are enclosed for your information and reviews We will review these with the Council and answer any questions on Tuesday, July 18 at Council worksessiono CRW/ds DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ' JULY 5, 1989 2030 P.M. * 11:30 a.m. Art in Public Places Draft Work Session. SITE VISITS 12°30 P.M. 1. Kitchenworks Sign (Betsy) Vail Village Inn Phase III MOTIONe Pat H. SECOND: Jamie C. VOTE: 5-0 Provision wall sign noted Vail Village Inn Plaza 12 2. Golden Bear Awning (Kp) A & D Building MOTIONo SECONDo VOTE: TABLED TO JULY 19TH MEETING 3. Snow Residence (Kp) Lot 28, Vail Village West 1st MOTIONe Roy S. SECONDo Crist VOTEo 5-0 With conditions. 4 4. Roush/Dean Residence (Rick) Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Intermountain MOTION: SECONDo VOTEo ~, ~ z{~' 7 2 5. 6. 7. 10 8. Up The Creek Bar & Grill (Rick) Vail Village MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Gore Creek Plaza Building Entry (Rick) Vail Village MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Finishing Touch Sign Variance (Rick) West Vail Inn MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: May Palace - New Awning & Sing (Mike) Vail Village MOTION: Chuck C. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. 6 9. David's Deli - New Awning & Sign (Mike) 536 West Lionshead Mall (Formerly Alfie Packers) MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO JULY 19TH MEETING T .,i J . 5 10. Maitland, (250 Ord.) (Mike) Lot 18, Block 6, Vail Village West Filing 2 MOTION: Jamie M. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 5-0 Approved as submitted. 11 11. Cyrano's Awning Vail Village MOTION: Roy S. (Betsy) SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 5-0 Consent approval. 8 12. Noel Signage (Betsy) Sitzmark Losge, 183 East Gore Creek Drive MOTION: Roy S, SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 5-0 Approval. 13 13. Clagett/Rey Gallery Vail Village Inn Phase III MOTION: Roy S. SECOND: Pat H. Consent approval. 9 14. Willows Condominium Remodel 74 East Willow Road MOTION: Roy S. SECOND: Pat H. (Betsy) VOTE: 5-0 (Betsy) VOTE: 5-0 S~ ` ~~ i ~t 1 15. Velasquez Addition, (250 Ord.) (Betsy) Lot 4, Block 1, Potato Patch MOTION: Roy S. SECOND: Chuck C. VOTE: 5-0 Sante moved to approve, subject to staff approval of landscape plan. 3 16. Wendy's Flag Pole MOTION: Roy S. SECOND: Pat H. Consent, Ned Gwathmey abstained. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chuc'.k Crist Ned Gwathmey Roy Sante Pat 13errington Jamie McCluskie STAFF APPROVALS: (Betsy) VOTE: 4-0-1 MEMBERS ABSENT: Steep & Deep - Storefront repaint. Le Petite Cafe - Storefront paint & name. Garcia Remodel - Enclosure deck w/greenhouse. structure. Racquet Club Office - new office space. Montanero's 250 Ord. to unit #417. Hollis Residence, addition & remodel, L 15, B 2, V.V. 13th. Vail Village Plaza Condos unit #28 - Interior expansion only. Dawson Resid. - New door & move existing window, Lot 4, V.V. 9. Mountain Hus walkway - improve walkway. Corcoran Resid. - New window, Lot 4, V.V. 9th. RESOLUTION N0. 27 Series of 1989 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE TOWN ATTORNEY TO FILE A PETITION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ALL THE PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, A COLORADO HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY FROM THE PROPOSED EAGLE VALLEY METROPOLITAN TELEVISION DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Town Council submitted the question of the participation of the Town of Vail in the proposed Eagle Valley Metropolitan Television District to the registered voters of the Town; and WHEREAS, at a special election held on July 11, 1989, the registered voters of the Town of Vail voted not to participate in the proposed Eagle Valley Metropolitan Television District; and WHEREAS, 32-1-305(3), C.R.S., as amended, provide that the District Court shall exclude property located in any home rule municipality in respect to which a petition for exclusion has been filed by such municipality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: 1. The Town Attorney is hereby directed, in accordance with C.R.S. 32-1-306, as amended, to file a petition with the District Court in and for the County of Eagle, Colorado for the exclusion of all property located within the corporate limits of the Town of Vail, a Colorado home rule municipality from the proposed Eagle Valley Metropolitan Television District. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk D JUL 1 0 19~~ July 7, 1989 Mr. Kent Rose, Mayor Town of Vail Post Office Box 2101 Vail, Colorado 81658 Dear Mr. Mayor: After six years of exhaustive administrative proceedings, Lodge Properties Inc., the owner of The Lodge at Vail, has exchanged 385 acres of critical private land in the Eagle's Nest Wilderness for 2.1 acres of land adjacent to The Lodge in Vail. The exchange went through four appeals by the Town of Vail and others before final approval was granted. Much to our disappointment, the Town has continued its opposition and went to Federal Court in an effort to stop the transaction. It did so even though the closing had already taken place. Furthermore, it appears that the Town has decided to maintain this suit and attempt to overturn the exchange, not only against The Lodge but also against the U.S. Government, the Secretary of Agriculture and numerous Federal officials individually. In taking this step, the Town has chosen to join The Lodge Tower Condominium Association who is the primary plaintiff and to be represented by counsel for that association. Lodge Tower is in litigation with the Lodge over unrelated matters and intervened in the land exchange in January 1988 on the third appeal, only after losing its case against The Lodge in the trial court. It was our hope that once the land exchange was completed, after thoroughgoing consideration over a period of years of all of the issues, we could work with the Town to plan development of the parcel in a mutually acceptable manner. Instead, it appears that the Town has chosen to continue the expenditure of public funds to try to reverse the exchange. In that effort it is supporting a private condominium association which is in court with The Lodge in a separate case stemming from the association's failure to meet certain financial obligations in a timely manner. We do not view this as evenhanded treatment. It raises serious questions regarding our ability to discuss this matter with the Town, as all discussions would be required to be communicated to the Lodge Tower. This may present a grave risk of damage to our business. 17~ East Gore Creek I?ri~-e ~~ail, Colorado 81657 303-476-5011 Telex 45-0375 Further, we are entitled to expect that any proposals we may make to develop the property will be given full and fair consideration by the Town. The Lodge is an important local business and is obviously interested in maintaining the special nature of Vail as a world-class resort rather than detracting from it. We should not be prejudiced by statements and actions by the Town against our plans which have not even been finally formulated, much less submitted. Now that the land exchange process is over and there has been ample time to consider all of the issues involved, we would welcome the opportunity to work with the Town and its officials outside of the courts, in a constructive atmosphere in Vail where both of our interests lie. incerely yours, Erik P. Woit President cc: The Vail Daily v.a ..~~, MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 20, 1989 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Michael Cacioppo Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Tom Steinberg None Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The first order of business was an update by the Colorado Department of Health on the Eagle Mine Clean-up. Dick Parchini, the on-site field officer of the Department of Health overseeing the construction on the mine, discussed the health and environmental monitoring issues of the clean-up. After some discussion with Council, it was decided he would give another update at the July 11 Evening Meeting. The next item was a consent agenda of the following items: 1. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance adding recreational amenities tax rates for new zone districts which have been formed since the original ordinance was written. 2. Ordinance No. 12, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 40, Series of 1988, to provide changes to Area D (Glen Lyon Office Property) requirements that concern the condition of undergrounding utilities; a new location for the bus stop; a deceleration lane on the South Frontage Road; a minor subdivision; and stairwell addition; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Mayor Rose read the full titles of the ordinances. Kristan Pritz stated Holy Cross Electric was still working on a letter regarding undergrounding the utilities, and once it was received, she would discuss it with Council at a Work Session. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the consent agenda items, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The third item was Ordinance No. 13, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance establishing the Booth Falls Local Improvement District. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Larry Eskwith stated there was a problem, as there was a new engineer at Banner Associates, and he gave a different and higher estimate on the cost. Stan Berryman commented the item was going before the Design Review Board tomorrow, and depending on their requirements, the project could cost up to $50,000 more. Stan stated the problems with the district were: 1) the Booth Falls Townhome Association representatives were present and wanted to be included in the district; this would require the work to go 500 more feet and would involve Forest Service requirements, and 2) that portion would have to be engineered and a cost estimate made. Mayor Rose said he would rather table the item, staff could put it out to bid, see if the price would be acceptable to the property owners, and go forward from there. Jack Acuff commented he was disappointed to have come so far and the engineers make so large a mistake; he wants to go forward with the original amount quoted. Larry remarked the Town used the engineer recommended by the neighborhood, and what Jack wants would take longer unless the Town was willing to pick up the slack. There was some discussion by Council about why it had to go to the Design Review Board, and when the item would come back for the public hearing and second reading. Jerry Gravin of the Booth Falls Townhomes gave an explanation why the 18 townhome units wanted to be included in the mitigation. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal asked why they were not here earlier, and can the project be phased? Stan replied a second district could be formed. Susan Fritch gave some background information on what had happened up to this point and how they were very interested in forming a district. Stan responded. Jack Acuff stated he would like the Booth Falls Townhomes to be included. Larry felt it would be best to table this item until the July 18 Evening Meeting. Merv Lapin made a motion to table the ordinance until July 18, 1989, which John Slevin seconded. At this time, Eric Affeldt commented that at the July 18 meeting, the Townhomes would not be included, and he encouraged the group to start their own process. Larry remarked he would help all he could. Ron Phillips stated yes, but the Town would take over the administration of the special development districts and notification of all property owners, so to take the burden off the property owners. Jeannine Hallenbeck initiated some discussion with Council over the upcoming process. It was clarified that staff would use the new cost estimate, put it out to bid, and notify the property owners; also, they would work with the engineer on substantiating the cost. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-O. The next order of business was Ordinance No. 17, Series of 1989, first reading, concerning the issuance of local improvement bonds for the Booth Creek Local Improvement District. Mayor Rose read the full title. A motion to approve the ordinance and schedule second reading for the July 18 Evening Meeting was made by Merv Lapin, and seconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Eric Affeldt commented he would support the motion, but was uncomfortable with approving blank figures. The next agenda item was Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, capital projects fund, real estate transfer tax fund, and Vail marketing fund of the 1989 budget and financial plan, and authorizing the expenditures of such appropriations. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Steve Barwick stated the ordinance had been reviewed at the Work Session that afternoon, and that most were roll forwards for projects from 1988, $200,000 in the general fund was for the parking structure, and that this money was not to be spent, but by law had to be shown as an expenditure. He noted $150,000 was for the streamwalk, and $414,000 was for street improvements. There was much discussion by Council regarding street improvements, costs, and the parking structure. Mike Cacioppo made a motion to approve the ordinance with amendments to eliminate $150,000 for the streamwalk, and eliminate $1,500 for an acoustic wall in the Library. There was no second, and the motion failed. Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve the ordinance with the exclusion of $150,000 for the streamwalk, so the total would be $3,083,881. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal seconded. Ron Phillips stated he would like some of the $150,000 to stay in for design costs. There was much discussion by Council, Ron, and Peter Patten regarding the streamwalk money. Tom Steinberg opposed the removal of the $150,000 for the streamwalk. At this time, Eric modified his motion to leave an amount not to exceed $10,000 for preliminary studies of the streamwalk, which Gail seconded. Mike Cacioppo stated his concerns over this. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2, with Mike Cacioppo and Tom Steinberg opposing. The sixth item was Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance vacating a portion of a cul-de-sac in Intermountain, adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Intermountain Subdivision. Mayor Rose read the full title of the ordinance. Rick Pylman reviewed the drawings of the cul-de-sac and property lines. He then reviewed the plans and reasons why staff recommended approval. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance, which was seconded by John Slevin. There was then some discussion by Council regarding the cost. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next order of business was an appeal of the Design Review Board decision to approve changes to design details for the Chester residence located on Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. The appeal was made by W. Grant Williams (adjacent property owner). Mayor Rose noted the process was to discuss precisely what was presented to the Design Review Board and nothing more. Item four of the Stutz, Dyer & Miller letter was the only item to be discussed. Larry Eskwith agreed, stating Stutz was dealing with the three other issues in District Court. Kristan Pritz and Jay Peterson reviewed the plan approved by the DRB and compared them to the new plans. Greg Stutz remarked the problem was with the design change of the roof, and gave details. There was much discussion by Jay and Greg regarding problems with the roof line. There was then some discussion by Council and staff regarding the Planning and Environmental Commission's and Design Review Board's charges. A motion -2- to uphold the DRB decision regarding changes on the Chester residence was made by Merv Lapin and seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1, with Mike Cacioppo opposing. The next item was certification of election judges for the July 11, 1989 special election. Pam Brandmeyer remarked Kay Chaney, Lee Bennett, and Joan Norris were the proposed election judges. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the appointment of these election judges, which John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Under Citizen Participation, Gordon Pierce stated over the last 30 years, he never worked on a project that did not have changes. He wanted .to apologize; things used to be "loose" and the staff has been working hard to tighten things up. He feels things are back in the right direction now. He stated he was not trying to get away with anything, and will work hard with staff so things like this do not happen. John Cogswell discussed the subject of public art, and encouraged Council to support public art. Kristan Pritz noted she was working on an ordinance now. Merv Lapin questioned where things stood on point of sale sales tax. Ron Phillips responded he would check on it. Tom Steinberg questioned how the Donovan Park reseeding project was going. Kristan Pritz replied the Vail Valley Foundation was supposed to get back to her regarding this; she was just waiting on their call. Tom also had a question regarding the snow dump land. Mike Cacioppo stated he remarked at the Work Session today the Town had $550,000 additional sales tax revenues. He asked business owners to go before the Council and ask for the business license fee ordinance to be rescinded. There was some discussion by Council regarding the pros and cons of this. John Cogswell noted he was glad to see the marketing going on, but was concerned about Front Range marketing. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- JUL ~ STATE OF COLORP,DO C®L®RAD® DEPARTPAENT OF HEALTH 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Phone (303) 320-8333 June 30, 1989 Mr. Ron Phillips Town Manager Town of Vail 755 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. Phillips: OF'~ f 1 # , ;~v \~ " - ~i *I876x' Roy Romer Governor Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. Executive Director Based on expressions of concern by various citizens and organizations in the community, the Health Department has undertaken a re-evaluation of the air monitoring pro.~ram at the Eagle Mine site. Concerns have been expressed that the current 24-hour average, every-third-day monitoring at the Middle School and lower Cross Creek does not reflect potential continuous e,~posures; does not provide reasonable data turn-around time for particulates and metals; may not accurately reflect exposures to certain segments of the community because of unusual wind conditions; and does not provide "real-time" information about exposures to school children and others. kTe have evaluated four options and variations of options in light of these concerns: 1. Beta gauge sampling. This is the only device capable of providing close to "real-time" particulate concentrations, as it could provide this information on an hourly basis. It does not provide metals analysis any quicker than other methods since metals analysis would still need to be done by an off-site laboratory. Other disadvantages are that such a device would need to be purchased (involving time delays in implementation), would require extensive personnel time, and metals analysis would not be performed by accepted analytical procedure. 2. Daily sampling of total suspended particulates, (TSPI with a weighing of the sample on site, with 48 hour turn-around time on suspended particulate results. 3. Same as 2, but with off-site weighing. This provides more accurate, but less immediate, results. 4. Directional, wind-activated sampling. These samplers would provide impact data from a specific source, but would not produce data related to any state or federal standard. Mr, Ron Phillips Page 2 June 30, 1989 I have tentatively decided to implement the follotiving monitoring at state control and expense: a. Continuous TSP monitoring at the middle school with a goal of two week turn-around on both TSP and metals analysis. b. Installation of an indoor air monitor in the school. c. Installation of an additional TSP moxxitor at a location to be determined in the town. The re<~ ons for this tentative decision include: 1. the inability of any monitoring system to provide instantaneous metals anal}psis; 2. the lack of demonstrated need for "real-time" particulate data since the health impacts are based on long-term rather than immediate exposure; 3. the need for quick implementation of monitoring to obtain results prior to the school ,year; 4. our ability to implement additional monitoring should the need be demonstrated as a result of these efforts. I have stated that this decision is tentative in order to receive additional input and comment from the community beyond what we have already received. Perhaps there are other measures we have not considered which can be easily and quickly implemented. We need to ascertain locations for the indoor monitor at the school and the additional monitor to be installed in the town. We want; your ideas . I fully realize that the approach outlined here does not meet all concerns. I would ]_ike to implement additional monitoring the week of July 10 and make further modifications as necessary in the future. Dan Scheppers will be on-site the week of July 3 and will attend the Minturn Town Council meeting July 5. Please provide comments to him next week. Dick Parachini will be back on-site July 10. Sincerely, /, Howard Ro i tman . CKi ~f Remedial Programs Section Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division HR/cf w ,,. i i 1 ~ ~~~~~~~ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING VAIL FgETROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 1989 3x00 - TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Call to order - 3:00 PM 1 min 2. Approval of Minutes, June 26, 1989 1 min (see attached) 3. Satch°s Restaurant proposal - Sackbauer 10 min (see attached) 4. Cross County ski contract - axils proposal (see attached) 10 min 5. Symphony of Sports Financial Report - Folz 7 min (see attached) 6. VMRD recreation plan - reset meeting date with Winston 2 min (see attached Winston letter) 7. Swimming Pool - Tim Garton 5 min 8. Tennis 15 min A. Ford Park Tennis Complex update - Bill Pierce B. Proposed Construction Budget - Dodson (see attached Beck letter) 9. Ice Arena Sub Committee Report - Salasky 7 min 10. Golf Course Sub Committee Report - Dodson 7 min 11. Approval of PO°s 5 min 12. Adjournments Attachmentse Minutes 6/26/89 Satch°s Restaurant - lower level Cross Country Ski SOS Financial Report Winston Letter Dodson Memo & Beck Letter Vail Golf Club - Revenue Report - FYI (Lapin requested) Phillips Memo - FYI RDQJL~R Y~TIlVG VAS, AS~~~LrI'Atd ~TICtd DIS~2ICT JiJIdE 2Fi, 1989 A PRFaSE~e Ken Wilson, George Knox, Tim Garton, Merv Lapin P ire Gail Molloy ~~ o Pat Dodson CAT7•Ta e The meeting was called to order at 3:15 PM. APL OF P~TI~e Wilson RE: statement on tennis building -does not feel building is 1/comfortable" instead of "inadequate" as stated in the minutes. Lapin RE: Volleyball -wants to add that if the King of the Mountain Volleyball Tournament is sold out the fees should be increased to help fund other recreation activities. Lapin moved to approve the minutes from June 14, 1989 with the two corrections, second by Wilson passed unanimously, VMf2D ~zF'.~'rTC~d PLUM: Jeff Winston joins the meeting 3:21 PM. Garton reviewed the meeting he and Molloy had with Affeldt and Steinberg regarding the recreation plan for VMRD. Affeldt wants VMRD to develop a cognizant management philosophy. Winston suggested he assist the Board members in putting down their vision of VMRD in the future, share this with the public and then focus on a year to year master plan. Winston wants to schedule a 1/2 to 1 day work shop with the Board ors to develop their ideas. Winston will facilitate this session with questions that will help the Board state their goals,, policies and how the Board will aocar~lish these goals and policies. Winston will then consolidate all these comments of the Board and mass mail to the public for their reaction. The Board wants to know the cost of Winston's services. Winston will get a dollar figure back to the board - probably 1/2 of the original proposal, maybe less. Winston wants the board to come prepared to the 1/2 day session. He will develop a questionnaire and give it to each of the Board members prior to the work session. He asks that each Board member complete this questionnaire prior to the work session as this will assure a more productive session in a shorter amount of time. Winston asked the Board what they want the final product to look like? Typed or published, etc? Lapin suggested he ask Dodson, Affeldt and Phillips what form they want to see this study. Dodson will call and poll the Board for their approval to continue with the Winston study as soon as Winston deter- mines his fee foz these services. The Boan-~ set Tuesday, July 11, 1989 at 9:00 to 12 noon, in the Vail Library as their meeting time if they approve Winston's fees. Knox will deliver pizza to the meeting. The Town Council should be invited as well as the general public informed of the meeting. FU12D PARK 'i'F'NI1TS TIC1~I: Bill Pierce joins the meeting 3:48 PM. Bill reviewed the changes he has made to the building -central stair with open ceiling to the 3rd floor, restrooms and storage all on bottom level. The foot print of the building has been reduced by 10% (approximately 150 s.f.) Cost of building -Dodson spoke to Payne and a VERY preliminary estimate is between $25,000 to $50,000 more. Payne will be taking a har`1 look at the cost of the building the end of this week. Bill Wright joins the meeting. Lapin asked Wright how many courts he would need at Forri Park. Wright stated 10 to 12 is best. The Boan3 approved two lavatories only in each restroom. Dodson recapped the Ford Park Tennis Building/Court construction as follows: a) Frank Payne con~lete cyst estimate of building b) TOV staff approval if possible, if not then DRB meeting c) Co~lete bid process -advertise for 3 weeks d) Bill Pierce develop construction drawings. Dodson asked the Boani if they have any final ~nents or changes at this time -this is the time to make changes before the process begins - later will be more difficult. Bill Pierce stated the following contractors had expres- sed an interest in constructing the building: Beck, Nelson Zeeb, Duddy Viele and 6 co~anies from Denver. Bill Pierce leaves the meeting. FIl~NCTAL RED: Brian Jones joins the meeting. Brian handed out a revised suam~aty report which corrects errors of the last report. In the future the financial report will be put in the packet. The report indicates the Ice Arena reve- nue is up •- the sub committee should recap why and inform the Board of any helpful items the arena staff has adopt~i to cause this and see if their actions could be incorporated into other programs to help them increase revenue. The Recreation Administrative 1989 expense statement is up and Dodson indicated the 2 administrative budgets have been combined (TaV & VN~D). Brian felt the General Recreation Administrative budget did not get added in the 1988 budget and it is only reflecting VN~2D ° s actninistra- tive account. Knox indicated he would like to know the golf revenues ~ month end vs. mid month numbers. Garton wants golf revenue reviewed with the golf sub committee; not necessary to have the full board. T TdRT71'i'y Ij~ o See hand out from Brian which covers the premiim~/caverage and pro/con of ISU and SI]A who were the two meanies submitting a bid for VNIl2D Liability Insurance. Brian stated SDA can only provide general liability insurance with limits up to $150,000 and $400,000 whexeas ISU can provide up to 1 & 2 million. The SDA Surplus Contribution of $10,642 is not refunded if the insurance is dropped after 1 year. SDA has indicated as of now if it is dropped after 5 years it would be refundable. Lapin asked if VNIF2D needs limits above the state limit of $400,000. Dodson said yes, because if a suit goes to the Federal court the amounts are unlimit~. Lapin asks that other bids be gather~i from other ccen- panies so Vt"IRD has further companies to compare with and possibly at a future date VNIRD may find it prudent to switch insurance meanies. Dodson will put this request in motion. Knox made a motion to approve ISU's bid, second by Lapin, Passed ply. _ Jones leaves moeting at 4:58 FBI. s`FnT P~Le Garton thanked all the board membexs for attending as many meeting as they possibly could during the week long swimming pool design session. Garton was very impressed with the Heery design group -organized and very crea- tive. A4orter did a good job too. Garton wants DaLson to convey to Morten this was just the first step in a leng- thy process. Call Morten and ask what his next steps are aril when is the next meeting with the Board. Knox feels the lines of the building at too hard. Garton indicated that when a building gets to the size the pool building is, the size dictates the looks. The Architects have noted this concern of the building looking too hard and will soften it. They mentioned a possible way to soften the building is to carry the wood beams to the outside of the building. Garton indicated the swimming pool task force looked at many pools - Denver, Orlando, etc. Garton would like Hotter to tour as many pools as he possibly can to help him in the process of developing Vail's pool. Lapin was very impressed with the design prnoess as a first step. Dodson stated VMRD's goal should be to market the concept acid educate the public on this type of pool. He will ask Brian Jones to prepare a 5 year budget of the pool for educational purposes: The Board noted many citizens are still indicating Lions- Head as their choice of location for the pool. Garton will again spe~-tk to Mike Shannon of Vail Associates regarding Lionshead as a site for the pool. POLICY FC~R VMF2D: Lapin wants all ccnt~ to be cleared prior with the Board or if time does not allow to inform the board ASAP after the ccnt~ has been given. Dodson indicated this plan is not flexible enough for the staff to operate. Do not ask the staff to seek Board approval for every ~ request -set the policy, even if it is no comps allowed and the staff will follow the policy. Lapin says comps do not show up on the accouunting sheets either net or gross - it is tax payers money and the oohs must be accoiuzted for. The Board will disclass golf and~ice arena comp policies in the respective sub carrnnittees and bring results back to the full board. A VMRD co~~limentary policy can then be set. There will be proper accounting of all ocx~s. Dodson stated he would like the Board to set a ccm~ policy and the staff will followe it. J~ FC~2D Il~VI7.~,TICt~L: Dodson handed out the JFT 1988 balance sheet (see attached) . Garton feels paragraph 16 of the 1989 JFT contract which requires JF'I to provide a financial statement in 1989, be stricken from the contract as VMRD does not require financial statements from other groups such as S~ttq~iony of Sports, etc. Garton wants Dodson to inform Barrett the 1988 balance sheet has been received, thank him for it and indicate it enforces VMRD's cca~unitment to continue to hold the JFI tournament every year in Vail. 'IY~e $40, 000 VNIRD donates via JFI's .use of the golf course is public money well spent for the benefit of Vail. After further discussion, the board decided not to strike paragraph 16 of the contract, as they wish to continue to receive the balance sheet of the JFI tournament so they may make a good decision whether to give the Vail Golf Club for the use of the tournament. JOIATr TOV/VMf2D POe Garton indicated he and Molloy met with Affeldt and Steinberg of the Town Council. The Town is asking for $10,000 in employee golf/tennis passes. Garton said the meeting was held in a spirit of cooperation vs. accounting. Affeldt and Steinben~ listened to the requests made i.e. swimming pool project, tennis project, ice rink etc. and Affeldt and Stein~xg will take these items to the full Town Council. VM12D would like Dodson to write a letter to Ron Phillips listing their reasons they feel TOV should pay for the landscaping around the Ford Park Tennis courts. Pi7RC~~SE e I~pin moved to approve the Purchase Orders subject to Knox's approval, second by Wilson, passed unanimously, AIlTC~]Fre Meeting was adjourned at 6:41 PM. Gail Molloy, Secretary SATCH'S RESTAURAWT LOWER LEVEL June 8, 1989 OVERVIEW A portion of the golf cart garage is proposed to be converted to a restaurant and lounge during the winter season to seat 65 guests before and after their sleighride and be an addition to the lounge presently in the main restaurant on the upper level. It is to Dave an atmosphere and theme related to the horse-drawn sleighride concession. It is proposed that this space in permanently altered so as to prevent and battery charging during the golf such a way that it can be converted w each winter season. The decoration the restaurant and lounge will for the Interior Structural the existing garage not be its uae for cart parking season but constructed in ith relative ease prior to and equipment required for most part be portable. A movable demising partition at the rear of the lounge (east) is located for optimum service access to the kitchen on the upper level, provides isolation of the space from any possible hazard related to tl~e carts and their support equipment in the remaining space and provides for emergency exiting with two doors with panic hardware. Three additional partitions in the openings of the existing center partition that runs east and west are also movable and serve as alcoves for a coat rack and for decoration. A removable window store front will replace the existing overhead garage door on the west outside wall. The proposed vestibule and the partitioning around the building equipment in the southwest corner will be permanent, however. Access to the equipment is to be provided. The concrete floor is to remain as it is. The gypsum board ceiling is to be painted. Plumbing All plumbing and fire sprinkler systems are to be unaltered with the exception that water will be brought to the bar from above and a holding tank for waste water built into tt~e bar equipment will be emptied by a pump, if needed, to existing drain lines. The service lines are enclosed within the overbar and posts. HVAC It will be necessary to alter the existing system and\or design an additional system to meet the needs of the proposed restaurant and lounge. Satch's Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 2 Electrical All existing outlets are to be unaltered in so far as possible. Additional service is to be installed for tl~e requirements of the proposed restaurant and lounge. Exterior Canopy It is proposed that an exterior canopy be constructed over. the courtyard on the west of the building. Its purpose is to provide a sheltered area for sleighride guests to board and disembark from the sleigh. It will also serve as an additional feature of comfort and hospitality in all seasons as well as provide needed protection for guests and employees from wild golf balls from the adjacent driving range. It is a space frame in general with retractable fabric panels to provide translucent control of the sunshine during the day and an inviting reflective surface from up-lighting at night in all seasons of the year. The structure is to be designed to harmonize with the building. It attaches to the existing soffit immediately above the garage door opening on the west elevation and to the outside wall of the south elevation. It is supported additionally by four square posts. It is to have a metal surface that is painted dark green to match the existing roof fascias. Satch's Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 3 DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS Floor Plan Exterior Canopy The space and configuration of the exterior canopy is shown. It is approximately 21'-3" by- 37'-3" and will be 9'-7" above t11e pavement at the overhead door. There are eight openings to accommodate the retractable fabric panels that cai~ be hand drawn by the use of a wand to the north and the south of each opening. The fabric is a special polyester awning fabric that is a pastel rose color. Up-lighting will be provided at the columns and/or the joists. Store Front Removable window The overhead door will be removed for tl~e winter season and replaced by a six panel double pane store front framed in wood that is painted dark green inside and out to match existing trim on the building. All glass is tempered. Vestibule The vestibule is to be frame and gypsum board with a one hour fire rating. It has one window consisting of two panels and a wood frame door with glass. All glass is tempered. Within the vestibule the walls are painted. The restaurant side of the vestibule is vertical plank siding that is weathered and fire treated. Trim around the door and window is painted to match the dark green of the building. The doors are to have panic hardware. There is an alcove parts-t ion on the north side that accommodates coat hanging. It is removable. Additional coat hanging is also provided in the vestibule. North Wall Electrical outlets are to be relocated to the ceiling so that the wall can be covered with permanent vertical plank siding as described above. The two openings will have removable one hour partition coves with the same siding. The alcove to the west will display tack and the one to the east will display bags of oats. A chair rail is to protect the special treatment shown on elevation B. This wall and all others has a two plank 12" baseboard and a one plank 6" crown. Botlt are painted the dark green and are fire treated. Satch's Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 4 East Wall and Service Area All of these partitions are removable and are one hour construction. They are covered with the same treatment as the north wall. - South Wall The existing wall is to is to be covered as above. The electrical outlets will be left as the}- are in so far as possible. The projection in the wall from the ceiling and the equipment in the southwest corner are to be permanently partitioned. Access to the equipment is to be provided. This corner will feature a small upholstered booth with a floor to ceiling partition that has two louvered openings. Also featured is a open cupboard with a steel rack inside that displays an inventory of new horseshoes. The doors have a 3" by 3" wire screen that is painted the dark green. West Wall This wall is dominated by the horseshoe display, the store front window and the vestibule. It is covered with the weathered siding as above. A shallow drink rail wraps the display, crosses the window and returns eastward along the vestibule. It is painted the dark green. That portion of the rail that is attached to the window a~ld immediately to each side is removable. Bar The bar is removable. It has two speed racks, sinks, ice chest (ice is brought in from the service area ice machine) and a waste water holding tank with a pump. The overbar is supported by four posts ,and accommodates stemware hanging and shelves for empty as well as limited full bottles. The bar top is bright red resin. The overbar is the dark green with red trim. The bar front is the typical weathered siding. Standing Bar The top is the same bright weathered barkless logs. red and the two pedestals are Buffet The counter top is the dark green and the pedestals are large, Satch,s Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 5 weathered, barkless logs. The sneeze guard is tempered glass in a steel frame painted the dark green. It is suspended from the ceiling and supported from the counter top. Chilled service will use ice pans. Warm service will use electric platters or chafing dishes. Tables Chairs and Stools These are to be random items preferably of old or funky styles. The tables are to be a dark red resin and the chairs are to be the dark green with bright red decoration. Any upholster~• that may be needed on the chairs and stools should be vinyl (leather). The upholstery on the booth and the banquette is to be vinyl (leather) also. A Elevation Left to right: Stlelves with bags of oats. Vertical weathered siding with dark green baseboard and crown along entire wall. Coat Kooks. Panic exit is a 20 minute door painted to blend with the weathered siding. Door trim is dark green. Lighted exit sign. Coat hooka. Large mirror in massive wood frame. Frame is antique silver leaf with red and gree» decoration and distressed. Banquette is vinyl (leather). Coat hooks. Opening to servic® area and second panic exit. Service area is weathered siding and panic door to match the other. Coat hooks. B Elevation Left to right: Cross section of exterior canopy showing swagged fabric panels. Cross section of store front window. Vestibule and entire wall is vertical weathered siding with dark green base board and crown. Alcove with tack display. Plural: Area outlining and behind the image is sand blasted to lighten the weathered wood. The image is taken from a high contrast black and white photo of the team and sleigh that has been put through a half tone screen. This is enlarged to a paper pattern that is transferred to the wood wall and the dots of the half tone are reproduced by driving roofing nails that have been painted flat black into the siding to within about a quarter inch, Chair rail is painted the dark green. Alcove for bags of oats. Shelves are dark green. Bags to be uniform and have clear printing saying "oats". Satch's Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 6 C Elevation Left to right: Partitian to cover jog in south wall. Entire wall is vertical weathered siding with dark green baseboard, crown, window trim and drink rail. Upholstered booth on raised platform is vinyl (leather). Horseshoe display. Dark green drink rail and bright red standing bar with weathered log pedestals. Vestibule and main entry. Coat hooks. Tack display. D Elevation This is a cross section through the room and the bar. Left to right: Store front window. Drink rail. Standing bar. Bar. Buffet. Banquette and mirror on east wall. F Elevation Left to right: Entire wall is vertical weathered siding with dark green base board and crown. Baffle wall for stairs and service area. Coat hooks. Existing electrical panel (paint to harmonize with siding). Assorted art, photos, stable brasses all dealing with the history of draft horses. Partition with louvered openings around booth. Good photo portrait of Steve Jones in funky frame. Upholstered booth on raised platform. Horseshoe display. Drink rail. Store front window. Table in Steve's booth and pedestals for standing bar must be secured to sockets that have been set into holes bored into existing concrete. Satch's Restaurant, Lower Level June 8, 1989 Page 7 LIGHTING OVERVIEH No fluorescent lighting is to be used. Most lighting fixtures to be low voltage track lighting with integral dimming capacity. Wall features are to be spot lighted or controlled flooding. Tables to be spot lighted. Bar is to be self-lighted with 120v incandescent, low wattage clear lamps that will both highlight the bottle display, the hanging stemware and the bar top. Task lighting under the bar for equipment. Buffet is self-lighted from suspended sneeze guard. Standing bar to be baffle lit from track on ceiling. Drink rail to be lit with exposed 7w clear incandescent strip lights in channel mounted on top window frame. Horseshoe display to be Yit from within _cupboard. .,~ R `1.~~ CFCSS CC~U~,7RY SKI CONCESSION LICENSE This Concession License...-is made and effective this day of 1989, by and between the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District (hereinafter referred to as "District") and Axel Wilhelmsen d/b/a Vail Mountaineering (hereinafter referred to as "Licensee"). District and Licensee are sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Parties". WHEREAS, District owns and operates a golf course, golf clubhouse, and related facilities situated in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, Licensee is an independent contractor who desires to provide cross-country skiing and related services to guests of the District on District golf course property (the "Concession Premises"); and WHEREAS, District deems it advantageous to grant a license onto Licensee to provide said services as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. District grants to Licensee and Licensee accepts from District the exclusive privilege of operating and maintaining a shop for clothing and equipment sales, repairs, handling, storage, sales and leasing of equipment and performance of services related to cross-country skiing and snowshoeing. The Parties agree that the operation of the shop is an important adjunct to the reputation and successful operation of the District. Accordingly, Licensee agrees to operate the shop in such a manner as to maintain a high-quality operation. 2. Licensee shallo a. Daily set and maintain a cross-country ski track system of a minimum of 15 kilometers on available terrain for both skating and diagonal skiers, said track system to be approved by District°s golf course superintendent to meet safety, maintenance and other standards established by District during the first season as hereinbelow defined. If the track system as constructed or maintained is not approved by District, Licensee shall have seven (7) days after District°s notice of non-approval to meet District°s approval. Licensee shall give immediate notice to District if mechanical problems, weather conditions or other factors prevent Licensee from maintaining the system. b. Furnish the use of the system without charge of a fee to District's guests, unless a fee is approved by District after Licen:~ee's request. c. Make available a sales and rental inventory, sufficient to meet all acre and ability levels and reasonable style requests of District's guests, of cross-country ski and snowshoe equipment, well maintained in a good and safe condition. d. Make available cross-country ski lessons from currently certified nordic cross-country ski instructors. e. Maintain a staff of sufficient size and ability for quality operation between the hours of nine (9) o'clock in the morning until four (4) o'clock in the afternoon each day during the period of November 20 through April 1 (the "Season"). f'. Submit copies of sales tax returns for purposes of financial reporting to District of Licensee's monthly operation at the end of each season. g. Pay all costs of operation, including, but not limited to, equipment repairs and property insurance on District's equipment, telephone, payroll and payroll taxes, services and advertising, in accordance with the budget agreed to by the parties prior to the commencement of operations each year. Advertising materials, poster and handbills shall meet all Town of Vail Ordinances. h. Provide all necessary permits or licenses required by the Town of Vail or State of Colorado. i. Provide adequate emergency equipment and staff trained in first aid and emergency services in connection with any instruction. - j. Pay the first $2,000 (deductible of District's policies) of each insured loss covered by District's insurance policies and all losses not covered by District's insurance policies. k. Provide such insurance against losses or damage of his business and inventory as he deems advisable, hereby waiving any claims against District for any loss of business or inventory as may oc<:ur . 3. Licensee has examined the Concession Premises prior to and as a condition precedent to his acceptance of the Concession Premises, and is satisfied with the physical condition. Licensee agrees not to 2 alter the Concession Premises without approval of the District in writing and agrees to return the Concession Premises and equipment and furnishing to District in a condition as good or better than when accepted by Licensee, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 4. District will provide at no cost to Licensee for Licensee's use under this Concession License: a. Exclusive use of District's golf course starter house each season, Licensee shall be under no obligation to provide food and beverage service from such premises. b. Exclusive use of District°s golf pro shop and bag storeroom each season for the use in Licensee's rental operation as a clothing, equipment, ski tuning and repair shop. Said shop and storeroom must be vacated no later than April 15 subsequent to each season. Licensee shall be under no obligation to display or sell any golf shop inventory. c. Track setting equipment consisting of one (1) track setter and two (2) snow cats, which shall remain property of the District, and insured and maintained by Licensee, and may not be disposed of without the District's prior written consent, except that such equipment may be sold or traded in by Lessee to finance acquisition of new equipment. d. Liability insurance in the amounts of $150,000 per person with a maximum of $400,000 per accident. e. Summer storage for track setting and ski tuning equipment. f. $ toward the cost of providing and erecting three "Vail Nordic Center" signs, on the north side of the golf course starter house, west side of the Golf Course Clubhouse and the bridge entrance sign to the. golf course. 5. Licensee shall at all times keep and maintain the Concession Premises and equipment and furnishings in good repair and in a clean, neat, sanitary and safe condition. District shall be responsible for the repair, replacement and insurance (except as provided in 2.j „ 2.k., and 4.c. above) as District determines to be appropriate of all structural and mechanical components and equipment permanently attached to the provided structures, including roofs, walls, foundations, heating plant, plumbing and electrical systems. 6. The Initial term of this Concession License shall be for a period of one (1) season commencing November 20, 1989 and ending April 1, 1990, no rental fee shall be payable during the Initial term. The 3 term of the Concession License shall be extended within 30 days of the expiration of the Initial terms, for a Primary term of five (5) years in the sole discretion of the Licensee. During the Primary term the Licensee shall pay a rental fee to the district equal to six percent (6%) of gross receipts from the sales of goods and services, (excluding ski lesson revenues), on all receipts in excess of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,00.00) per annum, payable annually thirty (30) days after surrender of the premises. The term of this Concession License may be extended for Two additional five (5) year Renewal terms, if, in District's sole determination, Licensee's performance is determined to be satisfactory, upon terms and conditions substantially the same as the Primary term. 7. This Concession License, regardless of the referenced term, will terminate upon the death or physical disability (which prevents effective operation of the Concession) of Licensee or upon written notice by Either Party of a default of any of the covenants contained herein if such default is not cured within ten (10) days of such notice. 8. In the event that the Licensee purchases a new snow cat or track setting equipment during the Primary five year term, such equipment shall remain the property of the Licensee, in the event the District terminates this license during that term, and Licensee is unable to sell such equipment to a third party the District shall purchase such equipment from the Licensee at depreciated book value, based on a ten year useful life of the equipment. 9. It is understood and acknowledged by the Parties that the relationship of Licensee to District is that of an independent contractor. District does not incur any liability relative to debts or obligations of Licensee. l0. This Concession License may be assigned to a Corporation that may be formed and controlled by the Licensee, upon notice to the District, may be further assigned only upon prior written consent of the District, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, based upon the business experience and financial worthiness of such Assignee, contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes any prior written or oral understanding of the Parties. Any alteration or modification of this Concession License must be in writing. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision herein shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Concession License. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Concession License as of the date set forth herein abovee VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT Byo Addresso AXEL WILHELMSEN D/B/A VAIL MOUNTAINEERING By: Address: 5 Il~~~ ~~IRI~~~ ~~~I~IH[®~~ ®I~ ~~QDI~~I'~ Fg1~dAI~~~A~, IftE~®R'd' PR®.IE~T~~ GENERAL SEATING ...................$22,500 ON ICE ............................................4,Q00 - $26,500.00 A~7'~IA~ GENERAL SEATING ..........................$1 1,075 ON ICE ...................................................2,240 T®7'~1L $13,315.00 `: ?~~~.,nY,;.. ::~ • PROJECTED A~7'11,4L FOOD ......................................................$fl8,800 $13,230.05 Dinner ................$12,000 Cocktail Party.. ...4,000 Lunches ............. ...1,800 Dinners .............. ...1,000 Other ..............................0 TRANSPORTATION .......................... $ 3,850 $ 2,047.21 Vans ...............$2,800 Cars ..................1,050 Other .......................0 PRINTING ............................................ $ fl,875 $ 1,729.31 Tickets............$ 400 Invitations..... 100 Signage........... 250 Gift Bags......... 1,125 Other .......................0 DECORATIONS .................................... $ 1,500 $ 1,869.92 Flowers ..............$600 Balloons .............. 400 Centerpieces.......500 ADVERTISING ................................... $ 5,000 $ 4,523.50 Front Range print/radio...$3,500 Local .................................._.. 1,500 VOLUNTEERS ..................................... S 900 $ fl,347.96 Uniforms............$900 SALARY/WAGES .............................. $ Il,000 $ 1,068.30 Assistant............$1,000 OPERATION ....................................... $ 1,000 $ 678.97 PRODUCER'S PERCENTAGE ............. $13,250 $ 5,703.62 EXPENDITURES OVER INCOME: $22,475 $18,883.84 TOWN OF VAIL CONTRIBUTION: 16,500 16,500 $ 5,975 $ 2,383.84 $48,975 $32,198.84 TOTAL EXPENSES .. 1989 CARESS SYMPHONY OF SPORTS...........EXPENDITURE DETAIL FOOD .......................................... ...............................................................$13,986.71 Saturday Cocktail Party......... $9,986.71 Friday Night Dinner .............. 2,791.88 Athlete Dinners ....................... 151.46 Hostess Bar ................................ 300.00 TRANSPORTATION .................. ~ 2,047.21 ............................................................ National Car Rental ................ ... $1,382.21 Co. Mountain Express ............. .....290.00 Vans to Vail ............................... . 375.00 PRINTING ...............................................................................................$ 1,729.31 Vail Sign Services .....................$225.00 Avon Quick Print ......................... 20.00 Stationary Travelor ................... 46.35 Vail. Printing ............................... 322.33 Prornpt Prin[ing ......................... 99.76 Vail Printing ............................... 382.74 Mount n Frame ............................ 310.60 ADVERTISING ............................. $ 4,523.50 ............................................................ Vail Daily ..................................$1204.00 Vail Trail .................................. 412.00 Rocky Mt. News ........................1,134.00 Denver Post .............................. 1,033.50 K V MT .......................................... 280.00 K LITE ........................................... 280.00 KSPN ............................................ 180.00 SALARY ..................................................................................................$ 1,068.30 Ted Martin ..................................$650.00 Lee Gaines ................................... 418.30 DECORATIONS ............................................................... Flowers ..................................... ...$993.00 Pier 1 imports ............................. 90.00 Memory Baskets ....................... . 120.00 Pro Event .................................... 600.00 Gift Bag Hats .............................. 66.92 VOLUNTEERS ........................... ...................................... SDI Shirts .................................$1,347.96 .................$ 1,869.92 ..................~ 1,347.96 OPERATING .............................................................................................$ 678.97 Sewing Machine Rental......... $ 33.00 Credential laces, coolers, reimbursements ...................... 645.97 TOTAL...........$26,495.22 WINSTON ASSOCIATES PLAN N I N G J R B A N D E S I G N ~ANDSC~.PE ~ nCF+:'EC TUFE 30 June 1989 Vail Metropolitan Recreation District 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 RE: Recreation Master Plan Dear Board Members: Following the direction provided at the last Board meeting, we are proposing this revised scope of work to arrive at a first master plan for the Vail Metropolitan Recreation District (VMRD): OBJECTIVE To identify for the public, the general direction, philosophy, and operating policies of the Board of the VMRD. The document that results is intended to be an overview, a point of beginning for a master plan. That is, it will not deal with detailed facility needs, locations or fiscal budgeting, but rather will focus on goals, objectives and specific policies (where they can be identified at this time) relating to the mission of the VMRD and generally how it expects to accomplish that mission. ~ - APPROACH The Overview Pian will be developed through a series of half-day work sessions with the Board and staff members. At these work sessions the Board and staff will identify and discuss their views as to the direction, role and responsibilities of the VMRD, and how the VMRD should respond to existing and potential issues and concerns. After each work session, Winston Associates will summarize the views expressed and begin to formulate statements about mission, goals, policies, etc. These statements will be WINSTON ASSOCIATES PL- ~:I'.~ UR9AN ESIGN L q ~„ E. c C_ a E A R C Y. ' E? ii A E VMRD Board Members 30 June 1989 Page 2 reviewed by the Board, and revised to include the Board's suggestions, until the document represents a general consensus (not necessarily unanimous). This draft; document will then be made available to the public for review, followed by a public hearing to receive ~omrnent. 'i he document will again qa revised under the direction of the Board and then be presented to them for formal adoption. We anticipate that this document will help the public understand the basic direction of the VMRD. It is assumed that this direction may change over time in response to needs and political considerations, and that this document will be modified and refined accordingly. DETAILE'.D SCOPE OF WORK To accomplish the above, we propose the following specific tasks: Hours Task 1: Work Sessions (3) JTW Cler. Three 1 /2 day work sessions (2 with Board, one with 9 staff). Survey of issues prepared for Board members prior to 4 3 1st work session. Travel (2 trips @ 1/2 hourly rate) 4 Digest and summarize conclusions after each work 9 6 session (3 hours each). - Task 2: Prepare Rough Draft of Overview Plan Document Prepare rough draft of Overview Plan document for S 3 Board review. Board review. 0 0 WINSTON ASSOCIATES PLAN N I N A U~ B A N D E S I G N L A N D S C o ~ E ~ R G H I T E C T U R E VMRD Board Members 30 June 1989 Page 3 Revise and format for public distribution as per direction 5 from Board. Task 3: Public Review Publish and distribute to public (VMRD staff). p Public Hearing. 3 Travel to public hearing (1 trip @ 1/2 rate). 2 Summarize and prepare possible modifications of Master 5 Plan for Board. Task 4: Board Review Review with Board possible modifications of Master Plan 0 based on public hearing (VMRD staff). Make revisions as directed by staff and Board. 4 Formal adoption meeting with Board. 2 Travel to meeting (1 trip @ 1/2 rate). 2 Final revisions as directed by Board. 3 Task 5: Final Report Preparation Print final document (VMRD staff) _ p Task 6: Miscellaneous Overall coordination with VMRD staff. 10 Total Hours 70 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 23 WINSTON ASSOCIATES P~_~NNiNG URBAN DcSIGN l ~ ti D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U F c VMRD Boarci Members 30 June 1989 Page 4 Total Fees 4900 460 Reimbursable Expenses (mileage, meals, xeroxing, etc.). 300 _ Grand Total SCHEDULE 5660 Because of .a scheduling conflict we were unaware of at the Board meeting, we propose a moving the lirst work session to Wednesday, June 12 (instead of Tuesday the 11th). We will schedules the second Board work session and staff work session at the meeting on the 12th. We anticipate that we should be ready for the Public Review by the second or third week of August. AUTHORIZATION We appreciate the opportunity to work with you to develop this important first document for the VMRD. I think the work session approach we have developed together will be very effective anti stimulating. If this proposal meets with your approval, a signed copy returned to us will constitute our authorization to proceed. If you need further clarification, or wish to modify the scope of work, we will be happy to discuss it with you. Sincerely, WINSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~~ Jeffrey T. V1linston President - JTW/djb 19 June 30, 1989 Mr. Pat Dodson, Director VMRD 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Pat: Attached you will find a total Budget Estimate, a Construction Cost Estimate, and a Cost Comparison for the latest version of the Ford Park Tennis Facility. This version includes the single upstairs office, the vaulted ceiling, the basement, the open glu lam stair system, etc. Regarding the attached information, please make note of the following: o Our original estimates for Tap Fees were based on 3/4" water service line. The existing engineering indicates a 2" line. The Sewer Tap Fee for a building with a 2" service line is $25,750.00. Now that we have fewer toilets we may be able to use an 1 1/2" line. The Tap Fee for this is still $14,500.00. You need to verify the water service line requirements with Alpine Engineering. o Bill Pierce's total fees of $18,500.00 were the results of a conversation I had with Bill. You may want to discuss the total fees with him. o The Building Permit actually went down a little bit based on using a $400,000.00 hard construction cost figure. o The single biggest budget impact item other than the Sewer Tap Fee is the open stairwell. -Eliminate the stone facing which could be added later. $7,950 savings. -Eliminate cupola. $10,000 savings This would be an additional reduction of the construction budget of approximately $18,000. It is important the Board keep in mind several items when making their decision. -Pre construction services will go up. -Utility lines will be put in by staff and have already been reduced substantially. There will not be any savings in this area. -Site cost, boulder retaining walls will be done by the staff and There will be very little savings in this area. -Landscaping will be done by staff and the budget has already been reduced substantially. There will be no savings in this area. -Contingency. There is no contingency in the budget at this time. A project this size should carry a 10% contingency for unforeseen problems. This would translate to $40,000. Please read the Beck letter and give me your feed back ASAP so I can reflect your feelings in the budget and start the bidding process. FORD PARK TENNIS FACILITY 6/30/89 BUDGET ESTIP4ATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL I) PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES $ 27,850.00 Architectural $ 18,500 Est. & Budget Development 7,500 Water and Sewer Engineering 1,850 Contour Verification ? Soils Testing ? II) UTILITIES/VMRD $ 37,645.00 Sewer Line 900' x 6" 16,000 Water Line 250' copper 3,500 Electrical Line 3,645 Sewer Tap Fees (based on 1 1/2" water line) 14,500 Electric Relocation (600) -0- III) SITE COSTS $ 33,415.00 Rec. & Bike Path Paving 11,883 Concrete Retaining Wall -0- (See East Court Est) West Tennis Court Grading 6,800 General Site Grading 1,500 Plaza (3584 sf) 10,732 Boulder Retaining Wall 2,500 IV) LANDSCAPING/VNlRD $ 22,500.00 Landscaping/vegetation 16,500 (32,000 sf sod) Topsoil (if required) 6,000 V) PARKING -0- $ -0- VI) EXHIBITION TENNIS COURTS $ 60,000.00 Two post tensioned courts 60,000 Page Two o The clock estimate went down because we no longer have a copper roof. o Once again, I would hope that in a bid situation these numbers would come in lower, but for budget purposes you should use these numbers. hesitate to call with any questions you may have. r,~l~, Fr~~ ~yne Vice President Beck and Associates, Inc. FP/di Enclosure • 5 FORD PARK TENNIS FACILITY 6/30/89 BUDGET ESTIMATE TOTALS PAGE TWO DESCRIPTION VII) PRO SHOP 2733 sf + 1108 sf storage 214,188 (see cost estimate breakdown) VIII) OTHER COSTS Bldg Permit/street use fee 5,295 Bonding (est. based on 2 1/2% of 400,000) 10,000 Builders Risk Insurance 850 Contractors Fee 22,000 Contractor General Conditions (Supt salary $13,000) 26,342 IX) ROOFING ALTERNATES (Existing estimate assumes cedar shingles) X) ALTERNATE DEDUCTS Use cedar siding in lieu of redwood ( 4,000) Reduce size of Plaza to 1100 sf ( 7,000) Use standard duty clocks in lieu of heavy duty ( 4,698) XI) EAST COURT Grade and Retaining Paths Two Post Permits Bonding S (Work to be done in 1990) Excavate 27,000 Wall 20,000 956 - Tensioned courts 60,000 1,620 2,700 TOTAL $215,118.00 $ 64,487.00 -0- FORD PARK Construction Cost Estimate _ 06-30-1989 Page 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Amount --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10027.0000 10028.000() 10031.000() 11010.000() 11020.0000 11030.0000 12010.0000 15010.0000 15040.000() 16010.000() 16020.000() 16040.0000 16050.0000 16060.000() LOCKERS FIRE PROTECT ACCESSORIES CLOCKS APPLIANCES KITCHEN CABINETS BATH VANITIES BUILT IN CABINETRY PLUMBING HVAC ELECTRICAL WIRING ELECTRICAL FIXTURES ELECTRIC HEAT SEC & FIRE ALARM PHONE & TV 2,434.00 300.00 11,232.00 550.00 1,450.00 600.00 4,000.00 10,350.00 400.00 8,477.00 3,118.00 2,800.00 3,200.00 250.00 Total Bid -------- 215,118.00 BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1413 VAIL, CO 81658 303 827-5711 FORD PARK Construction Cost Estimate 06-30-1989 Page 1 02030.0000 02090.0000 03010.0000 03030.0000 04030.0000 05010.0000 05020.0000 06011.0000 06013.0000 06040.0000 06041.0000 06050.0000 06051.0000 06060.0000 07020.0000 07030.0000 07040.0000 07041.0000 07050.0000 07060.0000 07070.0000 07080.0000 08011.0000 08013.0000 08030.0000 08040..0000 08042.0000 08050.0000 09030.0000 09060.0000 09071.0000 09072.0000 09090.0000 09100.0000 10010.0000 10025.0000 Description EXCAV & BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS CONCRETE SLABS STONE OR BRICK STRUCTURAL STEEL METAL FABRICATION ROUGH FRAMING MTRLS ROUGH FRAM LABOR SIDING & EXT TRIM SID & EXT TRIM LABOR INTERIOR TRIM INTERIOR TRIM LABOR INT STAIRS (FINISH) DAMP PROOFING PERIMETER INSULATION ROOFING BITUTHENE FLASH & SHEETMETAL INSULATION SKY LIGHTS JOINT SEALERS INTERIOR DOORS EXTERIOR DOORS WINDOWS FOLDING DOORS INTERIOR SLIDER DOOR HARDWARE DRYWALL PAINTING TUB & SHOWER TILE FLOOR TILE CARPET RESILIENT FLOORING BATH HARDWARE PARTITIONS Amount 4,140.00 500.00 11,800.00 4,605.00 7,950.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 18,151.00 12,000.00 10,376.00 6,720.00 705.00 1,640.00 12,380.00 513.00 1,656.00 9,900.00 3,080.00 500.00 4,433.00 636.00 200.00 1,750.00 2,850.00 10,064.00 1,664.00 1,830.00 10,016.00 8,199.00 1,500.00 4,184.00 4,005.00 705.00 955.00 3,350.00 COST COMPARISON FORD PARK TENNIS FACILITY JUNE 30, 1989 BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION 5/5/89. 6/30/89 DIFFERENCE EXCAV & BACKFILL 2,350.00 4,140.00 1,790.00 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 500.00 500.00 -0- CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS 7,000.00 11,800.00 4,800.00 CONCRETE SLABS 5,076.00 4,605.00 ( 471.00) STONE OR BRICK 7,880.00 7,950.00 70.00 STRUCTURAL STEEL 1,500.00 1,500.00 -0- METAL FABRICATION 500.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 ROUGII FRAMING MATERIAL 14,500.00 18,151.00 3,651.00 ROUGH FRAMING LABOR 9,000.00 12,000.00 3,000.00 SIDING & EXTERIOR TRIh1 10,716.00 10,376.00 ( 400.00) SIDING b EXT TRIM LABOR 6,720.00 6,720.00 -0- INTERIOR TRIM 660.00 705.00 45.00 INTERIOR TRIM LABOR 984.00 1,640.00 656.00 INTERIOR STAIRS (finish) 500.00 12,380.00 11,880.00 DAMP PROOFING 181.00 513.00 332.00. PERIt~1ETER INSULATION 798.00 1,656.00 858.00 ROOFING 9,225.00 9,900.00 675.00 BIlUTtIENE 3,080.00 3,080.00 -0- FLASH 8~ SHEETh1ETAL 500.00 500.00 -0- INSULATION 3,513.00 4,433.00 920.00 SKY LIGHTS 0.00 636.00 636.00 JOINT SEALERS 200.00 200.00 -0- INTERIOR DOORS 1,750.00 1,750.00 -0- EXTERIOR DOORS 1,200.00 2,850.00 1,650.00 WINDOWS 7,432.00 10,064.00 2,632.00 INTERIOR SLIDERS 0.00 1,664.00 1,664.00 FOLDING DOORS 950.00 0.00 ( 950.00) DOOR HARDWARE 1,275.00 1,830.00 555.00 DRYWALL 7,977.00 10,016.00 2,039.00 PAINTING 5,500.00 8,199.00 2,699.00 TUB b SHOWER TILE 1,224.00 1,500.00 276.00 FLOOR TILE 3,042.00 4,184.00 _ 1,142.00 CARPET 2,219.00 4,005.00 1,786.00 RESILIENT FLOORING 300.00 705.00 405.00 BATH HARDWARE 955.00 955.00 -0- PARTITIONS 3,350.00 3,350.00 -0- LOCKERS 2,434.00 2,434.00 -0- FIRE PROTECTION ACCESS 150.00 300.00 ( 150.00) CLOCKS 12,432.00 11,232.00 ( 1,200.00) APPLIANCES 550.00 550.00 -0- KITCIIEN CABINETS 1,050.00 1,450.00 400.00 BATH VANITIES 600.00 600.00 -0- BUILT-IN CABINETRY 4,000.00 4,000.00 -0- PLUMBING 11,800.00 10,350.00 ( 1,450:00: HVAC 400.00 400.00 -0- ELECTRICAL WIRING 6,000.00 8,417.00 2,477.00 ELECTRICAL FIXTURES 2,100.00 3,188.00 1,088.00 ELECTRIC HEAT 2,000.00 2,800.00 800.00 SEC & FIRE ALARM 2,838.00 3,200.00 362.00 PHONE & 7V 250.00 250.00 -0- 169,221.00 215,118.00 45,897.00 _,. 1f ~ ~{J / V ~ VAIL GOLF CLUB MEMBERSHIP GREEN FEE & CART REPORT 1988 1989 YTD YTD Golf Revenue> TOV monthly revenue and expenditures report MAY Pass 90,990 64,900 GF 28,823 42,802 Cart 10,542 15,374 TOTAL 130,355 123,076 JUNE Pass 104,985 96,240 GF 117,573 128,553 Cart 38,898 42,388 TOTAL 261,459 267,181 PASSES 1987 1988 1989 $ 6/30/89 REVENUE RESIDENT Adult-6 day 168 $67,200 7 DAY 167/68 186/56 12 6,300 Unlimited 3 2,550 Senior 18 26 40 8,000 Student 59 49 31 1,550 NR-6 day 1 10 14 10,500 NR Unlimited 0 0 0 0 Comps 11 Resident After 5 67 18 17 2,125 Resident ID Card 36 16 18 180 Punch Pass Eagle/Nail 4 300 TOV Employee 15 19 TOTAL PASS 434 382 318 98,705 REVENUE 93,465 117,807 98,705 TOTAL ROUNDS OF GOLF 1987 1988 1989 6/30/89 Paid 18 holes 12,905 11,950 3,466 9 holes 3,538 3,034 521 additional 262 Hotel 18 842 712 300 Hotel 9 23 25 12 Gold Eagle 15 154 TOV 18 157 69 TOV 9 153 After 5 513 176 62 Sr/Jr 18 256 218 27 Sr/Jr 9 196 171 UGA 410 453 91 TOTAL 18,855 17,125 4,741 Passes Public 7,894 8,750 3,123 TOV 18 224 232 69 TOV 9 265 70 Gold Eagle 753 750 412 VMRD 18 15 31 9 VMRD 9 25 35 2 Comp 32 27 Donated 18 1936 9 12 TOTAL 8,974 10,126 3,685 GRAND TOTAL 27,829 27,251 8,426 PRAXIP7U1'H OCCUPANCY/REVENUE FOR VAIL GOLF COURSE The following is a report that has been requested by Merv Lapin on the maximum number of tee times/rounds of golf per day, week or season. All the figures listed below are figured on a maximum or ideal season using 1989 rates. Season: April 15 to November 15 59 days pre season (4/15 to 6/12) 97 days season (6/13 to 9/19) 59 post season (9/18 to 11/15) 215 days TEE TIMES-18 HOLES: SEASON PRE/POST TOTAL 5:55AM/4PM 9AM/3PM Daily 65 36 Weekly 455 252 Monthly 1950 1080 Seasonal 6305 4248 10,553 Note: 10,553 TT x 4 people = 42,212 - 18 hole round of golf per season Maximum rounds of golf 18 holes: Pre Season 2124 TT x 4 = 8,496 Season 6305 TT x 4 = 25,220 Post Season 2124 TT x 4 = 8,496 42,212 Tee Times-9 holes: SEASON PRE/POST TOTAL 5:55AM/7:45__ 9/10:50 Daily it 11 Weekly 97 77 Monthly 330 330 Seasonal 1067 1298 2,365 Note: 2365 TT x 4 = 9460 9 hole round of golf per season Maximum Rounds of Golf - 9 holes Pre Season 649 TT x 4 = 2596 Season 1067 TT x 4 = 4268 Post Season 649 TT x 4 = 2596 9460 Revenue - 18 hole rounds: Pre Season 8,496 @ $35 297,360 Season 25,220 @ $50 1,261,000 Post Season 8,496 @ $35 297,360 42,212 1,855,720 Revenue - 9 hole rounds: .Pre Season 2,596 @ $18 Season 4,268 @ $25 Post Season 2,596 @ $18 9,400 TOTAL ROUNDS CARTS - 9 holes CARTS - 18 hole 51,672 46,728 106,700 46,728 200,156 2,055,876 9,460 @ $7 per person = 42,212 @ $10 per person = Maximum amount that could be received in one season using current rates 66,220 422,120 $488,340 This report does not take into consideration any season pass holder rounds of golf which have been: 1988 - 47% of total rounds 1987 - 32% of total rounds This report does not take into consideration any discounted rates in season such as VGA, JRs, Golden Eagle or after 5 pass holders. 1988: Total paid rounds 17,125 Discount 9 o:r 18 hole rounds 1,404 Total non discounted rounds 15,721 % of paid rounds .g % of total rounds (27,251) .05 1987: Total paid rounds 18,885 Discount 9 or 18 hole rounds 1,547 Total non discounted rounds 17,308 % of paid rounds .9 % of total rounds (27,829) .05 ~~ All Town Council Members Reminder - There will be a joint meeting between Council and the PEC Monday, July 10, 1:00 - 3:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. /bsc ~~u~~