The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-08-08 Support Documentation Town Council Work SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 2:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Discussion of Utilities Undergrounding for Arterial Business District 2. Discussion of Mountain Bike Race in Colorado Ski Towns 3. Discussion of Skaal Hus Sidewalk 4. Discussion of Proposed 1990 Capital Improvement Projects 5. Discussion of 1990 Fire Truck Replacement Purchase 6. Discussion of 1990 Vail Metropolitan Recreation District Capital Requests 7. Second Quarter 1989 Financial Report 8. Information Update 9. Other 10. Executive Session - Land Negotiations VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 1. Discussion of Utilities Undergrounding for Arterial Business Andy Norris District Kristan Pritz Background Rationale: To update Council on the issue of undergrounding utilities in the Arterial Business District. 2:20 2. Discussion of Mountain Bike Race in Colorado Ski Towns Kent Rose 2:40 3. Discussion of Skaal Hus Sidewalk Peter Patten Action Re nested of Council: Decide whether to use the 5,000 letter of credit on building the sidewalk or toward the overall solution of redesigning West Meadow Drive between Vail Road and Dobson Arena. Background Rationale: The Skaal Hus was required to build a sidewalk as part of their recent addition. They put up a $5,000 letter of credit for the sidewalk at Council's request. The sidewalk was to be built or the letter of credit due on July 14, 1989.. The Town has drawn on the letter of credit. Staff Recommendation: Use the money toward the larger project as the sidewalk may not be what we decide is the eventual solution. 3:00 4. Discussion of Proposed 1990 Capital Improvement Projects Steve Barwick Action Requested of Council: Review materials presented and make changes as desired. Background Rationale: Staff will present the details of the proposed 1990 capital projects fund and real estate transfer tax lists. This session will provide staff with a preliminary capital projects list for use during preparation of the 1990 budget. 3:40 5. Discussion of 1990 Fire Truck Replacement Purchase Dick Duran Action Requested of Council: Review material presented and provide direction to staff. Background Rationale: The proposed 1990 capital improvement project list includes purchase of a 75 foot ladder/pumper truck as a replacement for an existing vehicle. Because construction of fire trucks requires approximately 15 months, it is necessary to contract for purchase of this vehicle now in order to receive the truck in 1990. If approved, no funding will be required in 1989. Staff Recommendation: Approve purchase of the recommended fire truck. 4:00 6. Discussion of 1990 UMRD Capital Requests Pat Dodson Action Requested of Council: Review UMRD's requests for capital funding for 1990 and give direction to staff for 1990 budget process. 4:20 Steve Barwick 4:30 Ron Phillips 4:35 4:40 Background Rationale: UMRD has submitted several requests for capital funding which do not fall under the guidelines of the recreation contract between the Town and UMRD. Any decision to fund these items, and their priority if funded, should be made by the Town Council. 7. Second Quarter 1989 Financial Report Action Requested of Council: Receive presentation and ask questions as desired. 8. Information Update 9. Other 10. Executive Session - Land Negotiations -2- ~ ` TO: RON PHILLIPS FROM: PAT DODSON DATE: JULY 26, 1989 - REVISED AUGUST 3, 1989 SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT REQUESTS/TOV EMPLOYEE PASSES I have been delayed in answering your June 27, 1989 memo concerning Vail Town Council/VMRD committee meeting improvement request because we have been trying to get information from Sweden on the Rink Tex floor. We finally have secured that information and it should be to us via fax by the end of this week. In the meantime I want to address all of the issues and ask that we resolve this either at the staff level or at one of the town council work sessions. 1. Rinktex floor. I have contacted Burley Rink Company from Pennsylvania. They are in contact with Nordifa Halmstad, Sweden where the product is manufactured. They are sending a letter which will verify price, guarantee life, etc. The Rinktex flooring was purchased in 1979 and has been used for all special events except 3 events when the Homasote floor was used. Burley indicated the manufacturer's life expectency is around 10 years. The current cost, depending upon currency exchange, is $75,000 to $85,000 for the full floor. Current arena floor problems: Tears in 4 different sections of carpet and deep stains which will not come out. Carpet is steam cleaned once per year by professionals. The request is for replacement of the entire floor over the next several years. The replacement program was requested in 1988 for the 1989 CIPs. 2. Building permit fees for Ford Park Tennis Courts: The VMRD Board is still requesting the TOV waive the building permit fees and consider helping to fund certain portions of the project based on 6/30/89 project budget estimates (see attached). $22,500 landscaping _ $ 5,295 building permit fees $11,883 recreation path paving and realigning $25,445 utility lines $65,123 total request Total estimated cost of project: $461,015 This project is scheduled to start Sept 5, 1989 with a completion date of November 20, 1989. 3. TOV employee passes. VMRD Board has discussed this on two occasions and has agreed to the following: TOV will pay for the cost of their employee passes for 1989 and VMRD will refund said amount in 1990, subject to the VMRD's 1989 budget. VMRD is just starting to get a handle on their budget and i:s very sensitive to commiting unbudgeted funds because of their limited source of revenue via user fees and property taxes and their potential volitity to weather. The District is extremely interested in cooperating with the TOV, but very cautious of their tight financial situation. 4. Rubber matting in the lobby. This item was not addressed in your memo, but was requested and addressed at the subcommittee meeting and in the OIP request for 1988. The rubber matting was installed in 1979 and is called Durathon. I have attached a copy of the current estimated amount for 3,000 s.f. VMRD also requested that the matting be extended as originally intended into the east lavatories and to the zamboni door. This would add 500 s.f. and bring the total cost to $23,330. There is a 1 year guarantee on the product. However, because of our ongoing maintenance program and care of the product we have been able to get over ten years of wear. The request is for the cost to replace the matting over the next 3 to 5 years. 5. Swimming Pool complE~x - estimated $353,750 (please see attached sheet). I hope this information is sufficient and we can proceed. Thanks, Pat FORD PARK TENNIS FACILITY 6/30/89 BUDGET ESTIMATE I) II) III) IV) V) VI) DESCRIPTION PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES Architectural Est. & Budget Development Water and Sewer Engineering Contour Verification Soils Testing UTILITIES/VMRD Sewer Line 900' x 61° Water Line 250' copper Electrical Line Sewer Tap Fees (based on 1 1/2" water line) Electric Relocation (600) SITE COSTS Rec. & Bike Path Paving Concrete Retaining Wall (See East Court Est) West Tennis Court Grading General Site Grading Plaza (3584 sf) Boulder Retaining Wall LANDSCAPING/VMRD Landscaping/vegetation (32,000 sf sod) Topsoil (if required) PARKING EXHIBITION TENNIS COURTS Two post tensioned courts TOTAL $ 27,850.00 $ 18,500 7,500 1,850 16, 000. 3, 500 ¢ 3, 645 ~ -0- $ 33,415.00 11, 883 ~ -0- 6,800 1,500 10,732 2, 500 $ 22,500.00 ~ 16,500 6,000 -0- $ -0- $ 60,000.00 60, 000 FORD PARK TENNIS FACILITY 6/30/89 BUDGET ESTIMATE TOTALS PAGE TWO DESCRIPTION VII) PRO SHOP 2733 sf + 1108 sf storage 214,188 (see cost estimate breakdown) VIII) OTHER COSTS Bldg Permit/street use fee 5,295 Bonding (est. based on 2 1/2$ of 400, 000) 10, 000 Builders Risk Insurance 850 Contractors Fee 22,000 Contractor General Conditions (Supt salary $13,000) 26,342 IX) ROOFING ALTERNATES (Existing estimate assumes cedar shingles) X) ALTERNATE DEDUCTS Use cedar siding in lieu of redwood ( 4,000) Reduce size of Plaza to 1100 sf ( 7,000) Use standard duty clocks in lieu of heavy duty (- 4 , 698) XI) EAST COURT Grade and Retaining Paths Two Post Permits Bonding S (Work to be done in 1990) Excavate 27,000 Wall 20,000 956 - Tensioned courts 60,000 1, 620 2,700 TOTAL $215,118.00 $ 64,487.00 -0- BECK & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1413 VAIL, CO 81658 303 827-5711 FORD PARK Construction Cost Estimate 06-30-1989 Page 1 02030.0000 02090.0000 03010.0000 03030.0000 04030.0000 05010.0000 05020.0000 06011.0000 06013.0000 06040.0000 06041.0000 06050.0000 06051.0000 06060.0000 07020.0000 07030.0000 07040.0000 07041.0000 07050.0000 07060.0000 07070.0000 07080.0000 08011.0000 08013.0000 08030.0000 08040.0000 08042.0000 08050.0000 09030.0000 09060.0000 09071.0000 09072.0000 09090.0000 09100.0000 10010.0000 10025.0000 Description EXCAV & BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS CONCRETE SLABS STONE OR BRICK STRUCTURAL STEEL METAL FABRICATION ROUGH FRAMING MTRLS ROUGH FRAM LABOR SIDING & EXT TRIM SID & EXT TRIM LABOR INTERIOR TRIM INTERIOR TRIM LABOR INT STAIRS (FINISH) DAMP PROOFING PERIMETER INSULATION ROOFING BITUTHENE FLASH & SHEETMETAL INSULATION - SKY LIGHTS JOINT SEALERS INTERIOR DOORS EXTERIOR DOORS WINDOWS FOLDING DOORS INTERIOR SLIDER DOOR HARDWARE DRYWALL PAINTING TUB & SHOWER TILE FLOOR TILE CARPET RESILIENT FLOORING BATH HARDWARE PARTITIONS Amount 4,140.00 500.00 11,800.00 4,605.00 7,950.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 18,151.00 12,000.00 10,376.00 6,720.00 705.00 1,640.00 12,380.00 513.00 1,656.00 9,900.00 3,080.00 500.00 4,433.00 636.00 200.00 1,750.00 2,850.00 10,064.00 1,664.00 1,830.00 10,016.00 8,199.00 1,500.00 4,184.00 4,005.00 705.00 955.00 3,350.00 FORD PARK Construction Cost Estimate 06-30-1989 Page 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Amount --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10027.0000 10028.0000 10031.0000 11010.0000 11020.0000 11030.0000 12010.0000 15010.0000 15040.0000 16010.0000 16020.0000 16040.0000 16050.0000 16060.0000 LOCKERS FIRE PROTECT ACCESSORIES CLOCKS APPLIANCES KITCHEN CABINET;> BATH VANITIES BUILT IN CABINE7.'RY PLiJMBING HVAC ELECTRICAL WIRING ELECTRICAL FIXTiIRES ELECTRIC HEAT SEC & FZRE ALARM PHONE & TV 2,434.00 300.00 11,232.00 550.00 1,450.00 600.00 4,000.00 10,350.00 400.00 8,477.00 3,118.00 2,800.00 3,200.00 250.00 Total Bid --------- 215, 118.00 COST COMPARISON FORD PARK TEPIPJIS FACILITY JUNE 30, 1989 DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATE 5/ 5/69 BUDGET ESTIMATE 6/30/89 DIFFERENCE EXCAV 8 BACKFILL 2,350.00 4,140.00 1,790.00 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 500.00 500.00 -0- CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS 1,000.00 11,800.00 4,800.00 CONCRETE SLABS 5,016.00 4,605.00 ( 471.00) STONE OR BRICK 1,880.00 7,950.00 70.00 STRUCTURAL STEEL 1,500.00 1,500.00 -0- METAL FABRICATION 500.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 ROUGII FRAMING MATERIAL 14,500.00 18,151.00 3,651.00 ROUGH FRAMING LABUR 9,000.00 12,000.00 3,000.00 SIDING l~ EXTERIOR TRIh9 10,116.00 10,316.00 ( 400.00) SIDING ~ EXT TRIM LABOR 6,720.00 6,720.00 -0- INTERIOR TRIM 660.00 705.00 45.00 INTERIOR TRIM LA80R 984.00 1,640.00 656.00 INTERIOR STAIRS (finish) 500.00 12,380.00 11,880.00 DAMP PROOFING 181.00 513.00 332.00. PERIP•1ETER INSULATION 798.00 1,656.00 858.00 ROOFING 9,225.00 9,900.00 675.00 BIlUTHEPIE 3,080.00 3,080.00 -0- FLASH & SHEETI.IETAL 500.00 500.00 -0- INSULATION 3,513.00 4,433.00 920.00 SKY LIGHTS 0.00 636.00 636.00 JOINT SEALERS 200.00 200.00 -0- INTERIOR DOORS 1,150.00 1,750.00 -0- EXTERIOR DOORS 1,200.00 2,850.00 1,650.00 WINDOWS 7,432.00 10,064.00 2,632.00 INTERIOR SLIDERS 0.00 1,664.00 1,664.00 FOLDING DOORS 950.00 0.00 ( 950.00) DOOR HARDWARE 1,275.00 1,830.00 555.00 DRYWALL 7,911.00 10,016.00 2,039.00 PAINTING 5,500.00 8.,199.00 2,699.00 TUB & SHOWER TILE 1,224.00 1,500.00 216.00 FLOOR TILE 3,042.00 4,184.00 1,142.00 CARPET 2,219.00 4,005.00 1,786.00 RESILIENT FLOORING 300.00 705.OU 405.00 BATH HARDWARE 955.00 955.00 -0- PARTITIONS 3,350.00 3,350.00 -0- LOCKERS 2,434.00 2,434.00 -0- FIRE PROTECTION ACCESS 150.00 300.00 ( 150.00) CLOCKS 12,432.00 11,232.00 ( 1,200.00) APPLIANCES 550.00 550.00 -0- KITCIIEN CABINETS 1,050.00 1,450.00 400.00 BATH VANITIES 600.00 600.00 -p- BUILT-IN CABINETRY 4,000.00 4,000.00 -0- PLUMBING 11,800.00 10,350.00 ( 1,450:00' HVAC 400.00 400.00 -0- ELECTRICAL WIRING 6,000.00 8,477.00 2,477.00 ELECTRICAL FIXTURES 2,100.00 3,188.00 1,088.00 ELECTRIC HEAT 2,000.00 2,800.00 800.00 SEC ~ FIRE ALARM 2,838.00 3,200.00 362.00 PIIONE 8 TV 250.00 250.00 -0- 169,221.00 215,.118.00 45,897.00 EDW,~RD BAL.DWIN & ASSOCI,~TES 2828 N. CHELTON RD. COLORADO SPRINGS. CO 80909 719-471-2541 FAX 719-471-9544 July 18, 1989 Mr. Pat Dodson City of Vail 292 West Meadow Dr. Vail, Co. 81657 RE: Durathon Dear Mr. Dodson: Until May 31, 1999 ~" Durathon indoor material will cost the City of Vail $6.66 per sq. ft., landed Vail co. This cost figure includes the required adhesive (two part epoxy). Under seperate cover you will be receiving a sample of ~" Durathon. If we can be of further service, please let me know. Sincerely, ,, Edward L. Baldwin PS. I am researching where Durathon has been uses at other ice rinks. I will send you this information in near future. `='~0~~ Robbins~i~` GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS PART I-GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. Related V1brk Specd~ed Under Other Sections: 1. Substructure Buildup' a. Asphalt for outdoor or indoor m51alIBUOns. b. Concrete for ~ndos ~nstaliation ............. .Section 03300. 2. Concrete slab depression. Depression shat) be thickness of material specdied 3.16°-t a°-5-16'-3r8°-1:2°. Tolerance t!B' In radius of 10' Surface-steel howeled. 3. Membrane waterproofing and damp-proofing ... , , , , . ,Section 07100. Concrete subfloors on s bebw grade shall ~ adequately waterpr~Oted beneath and at the perimeter of the slab and on the earth side o1 relow- grade walls. 4. Thresholds' metals ................................ Section 08700. 5. Game standard inserts ............................. Section t 1500. 9.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Supplier OuahGcations: Supplier shall be an established firm, experienced in the field: Robbins, Inc. or approved equal. B. Instaner puamications: 1. Flooring contractor shall be a firm experienced m the flooring field and approved by the manufacturer. 2. Flooring contractor snail De factory-aPproved and have completed at least three projects o1 similar magnitude and complexity. 3. Submit three copies of manufacturer's recommendations for the correct preparation, finishing and testing of concrete (asphalt) subflos surface to reserve rubber sport surface. 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Manuacturer s Product Oata' Submn Three copes of Physical Properties. B. Samples Submit three samples o1 "Durathon" Rubber Sports SuAace in thickness desired. C. Maintenance Literature Submn three copes of "Durathon" Rubber Sport Surfaces maintenance instructions. 1.06 DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING A. Delivery o1 material. 1. Material shall not be delivered or installed until all masonry, painting, p!'s!°r.n ^le r.,Or!: marble and terrazzo wDrk ;,r2 completed. and a.. overhead meshan~cal work. Irohbng, backstops, scoreboards are in- stalled. Room temperature she l De at least 55 degrees Fahrenheit and moisture content of concrete slab 4°j, or lower 2. Area where materials are Io be stored should be maintained at 55 degrees Fanrennen and under 50°; relative humidity by the General Contracts. 1.05 JOB CONDITIONS A. Do riot install floor system until concrete has been cured ih~rty (30) days and the regwrements in Paragraph 1.04 are obtained 8. After sport surface s ~nstaued and game Imes painted, area s to be kept locked by General Contracts to allow c~rmg time for the paint and adnesrve No other trades are to be avowed on the floor until n ~s accepted by the owner or his agent 1.06 GUARANTEE A. Guarantee snail not cover damage caused in whole Or rn part by casualty. ordinary wear and tear, abuse, use for which material rs not designed, faulty construction of the building. settlement of the budding walls, failure of the other conbactss to adhere to specArcations, separation of the corxrete stab and excessive dryness s excessive moisture hom humidity, spillage, mechanical failure, migration thro Me slab s wall, or any other source. B. Robbins, Inc. hereby warrants theathon"Rubber Sport Surfaces to be hee hom manufacturing detects for a period o1 one (1) year. This warranty is in lieu of all other warrants, expensed Or implied, including, but not limited iq any warranty or merchantabl~ty or Mness Is a particular purpose, and of any other obligations on the part o1 RobDrns, Inc. In the event o} breach of any warranty, the habdny of Robbins, Inc. shall be limned to replacing "Durathon" ~iubDer Sport Surface material as suppled by Robbins and proven to De defective m manufacture. and shall not include any other damages, edher direct Or consequential. PART 2-MATERIALS 2.01 h1ATERIAlS A. Rubber Sport Surface shall De rubber roll goods wnh (insert-fieldhouse or hack embossing, thickness, cols). Tire rolls shall be (insert width) and 30'- 75' total length', determined by a combination of thickness, width and total roll weignl The materials shall be homogeneous, non layered rubber product cons~stin9 of a Dase of nattual rubber and synthetic rubbers vulcanized wnh mineral aggregates, stabilizing agents and pigmentation. Cal ND300-2885M 'Total roll length may consist OI mud~ple pieces. B. Phys~cal Properties 1. Physical properties are In accordance wnh ASTM D 3182, Standard practice for Rubber-Materials. equipment and procedures la mixing standard compounds and preparing standard vulcanized sheets. 2. Preparation of paces for test hom other Irian standard vulcanzed sneers are in accordance with ASTM D 3183 standard recommended practice 3. Test resorts are based on cured compound for comparison purposes. Aqual finished resilient product writ vary by approximately SO°,6. 1009L Yodulux (.SO) -ASTM D-412 Ourotr+wt 27S pd ComPProulon Sel (16) -ASTA/ D-J95 JOOti Mlodulue (_ SO) -ASTM D•412 72 Hro. Room TamP~) ~ / 7 TandlsSt th(_10p) -ASTY D 4 800 pal und. Room Tsmy. (XI Twr.p4C.PLl(~20) 84.2 2pp • 1 Erongatlon (t) (' so) -ASTY D-412 t0~ pal Bunt Loop Ozone Expoauro Ttmo to Flrot crack 2a nra. No Shore A Hardness JSO thanga altar -A5T11'D•2210 SO-SS Unilmltod Spike Traffic 4e to n lira. Yes NBS Abroxlon R of Control HBS Yelfwd Sd Pico AbrWer Vorume Lou (overage on 4 Samples) 0.08 Realotanca to Chemlul Agents -Calcium Chbrfde - ~Ommerdd Detergents - Good Good Flro Reale4nt ASTY E-Ba8 Flooring) Crlliul Redlant F lux -Ammonls -Uroe ((2A tiro.) - GooO ~ ~, J1 ( Ds 2) -Non-MWuatrid Olia (24 hrtt) GOOd Volume Realetlvity OHY-CY 8.65x10" CO•eMicienl of Friction: -ASTM D-257 to Leather 0.81.0.92 to Rubber 0.96 G Adheswe Shall be adhesive as approved by manufacturer, rro substnu• Mons EPOXY shall be used over wood. metal and concrere. POLYURE- THANE adhesive over asphalt, wood s concrete. Use of any rton- approved adnes~ve shall void warranty. D. Finishing Malerals Game-tine paint shall De recommended by Robbins and Compatible with the resilient rubber sport surface. E. Stain resatant to Commerual detergents, rotric acid, hydrochloric soil. mustard, ketchup, milk and Coffee. F Maintenance Easily Ueaned wnh water and light detergent PART 3-EXECUTION 3.Ot INSPECTION A. Inspect concrete for aspnatt) sublloOr for proper tolerance (see pt. t-Sec t.Ot•2) and dryness (see pt t-Sec. 1.04.1) and report any d~screpanc~es to general contractor m wrmng. 8 All work regwretl to put the concrete (asphalt) subfloor in accepts Die condnior. shall be the respons:Ddny o1 the General Contractor C $uDfloo+ snap be broom cleaned by General Contractor. 3.02 INSTALLATION A. Duathon Rubber Sports SuAaee t. The (Durathon Rubber) should be unrolled and allowed to relax balsa cutting and fitting. 2. Mix two-part epoxy (polyurethane) adhesive accsding to manufactur- er's directions on IaDel. Use 1 !8° notched (rowel Io spread adhesive. 3. Unroll Durathon Rubber Sport SuAace into hastily applied adhesive End seams will be single cut edge seams overlapped, then snapped into place to insure ugnt seam. 4. Roll the entire sport surface with medium-s,ze steel roller to remove any enhapped air. Wipe away any adhesive that oozes between seams wnh WOdd al~Oh01. S. All seams must De we~gnted ~n place Leave weight in place a minimum of twelve (t 21 hours. B. Line Painting should De in accordance with manufacturer's current procedwe, using appproved materials. C. Perimeter Molding (pptional): Install a rubber base, anchored to walls wnh base cement D. Clean up all unused materials and debris and remove same from the premises. For more information call I I R ®Copyright 1988 Robbins inc. your oca obbins contractor. Or contact Robbins, Inc., 4777 Eastern Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Tel: 513/871-8988 RnICtl m USA Manufacturer reserves trre rpnf to change des~r or specilxa hats to crrprove.DroOutt a processuq at any tine, without notice Ourathpn rs a re9~sfered trademark' d Ropoms. Inc FORD PARK S~dI~iAiING POOL COPSPLEX V1KRD will be responsible for the Vail aquatic center through the bond election and pay all costs. P,. If the Bond election fails, VMRD would like the TOV to reimburse VMRD all cost that have a value to the land and/or the TOV. 1. The survey 2,400 (est) 2. Soils test 3,000 (est) -. 5,500 B. If the election is successful then VMRD will request the TOV pay the following costso 1. Landscaping 245,000 2. Parking - 145 spaces @ $750 108,750 353,750 9ow~ of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-21 11 (303) 479-21 12 MEMORANDUM TOe Ron Phillips y FROMe Steve Barwick ,~y~ DATE: August 3, 1989 REe 1989 Second Quarter Financial Report Please find attached the 1989 Second Quarter Financial Report. The trend of a continually improving financial condition for the Town of Vail remains in full force. Many revenue sources are exceeding budget by a substantial amount while expenditures continue to follow closely to the budgeted levels. The Town°s financial position is best illustrated by the increasing fund balances shown on page one of the report. Most notably, the year end fund balance is projected to be $3.4 million in the General Fund and $1.9 million in the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund. SHB/ds TOWN OF VAIL SECOND QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT August 3, 1989 89FNDBAL TOWN OF VAIL STATEMENT C)F PRC)JECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE (O)perating Funds Only) 1/1/89 - 12/31/89 Revised: 8/ 2/1989 REAL ESTATE SPEC. PARRING HEAVY ; GENERAL CAPITAL TRANSFER ASSESSMENT EQUIPMENT ; -------------- -------------------- FUND -- PROJECTS FUND TAX FUND FUND FUND TOTAL Fund Balance 1/1/89 ----------- 2,621,753 --------------- 1,037,964 -------------- 1,971,840 --------------- 305,677 --------------- 333,493 --------------- 6,270,727 Projected 1989 Revenue 11,487,000 6,489,000 2,050,000 510,000 1,209,700 21,745,700 ; Projected 1989 __ Expenditures 10,715,449 6,770,710 2,135,519 250,000 1,216,340 ; 21,088,018 ; Gain/(Loss) ~ 771,551 ( 281,710) ( 85,519) 260,000 ( 6,640) ~ 657,682 Projected Fund Balance 12/31/89 3,393,304 756,254 1,886,321 565,677 326,853 6,928,409 ; SALHSYAY Beeised: 8/ 1/89 BOHTB 1980 1981 1982 ------------------------------------------ January 626,448 514,102 675,186 February 624,040 594,292 687,792 Harch 683,000 697,-464 853,648 April 246,820 308,436 355,300 day 89,1$0 135,774 147,378 June 176,044 245,204 247,326 N __________________'--'-- "--'--'--________ Subtotal 2,445,532 2,495,272 2,966,630 July 281,846 339,418 349,116 August 268,052 332,724 348,756 Septe®ber 176,090 285,918 268,598 October 137,376 225,024 223,830 Hovenber 140,630 210,254 245,894 Dece®ber 590,242 820,762 737,506 TOTAL 4,039,768 4,709,372 5,140,330 1983 696, 752 751,856 977, 828 319, 546 156,588 257, 744 3,160,314 407,474 384,338 324,670 198,614 281,104 853,100 5, 610, 214 TOHH OF SAIL SALBS TAI BSTIHATIOH HOB6SBBBT 1984 742,262 824,650 1,084,814 481, 204 166, 200 262,696 3,561,826 406,462 402,792 384,864 206,248 310,588 906,758 6,179,538 1985 1986 1987 ------------------------ 881,304 890,585 1,063,196 918,154 946,552 1,135,786 1,187,520 1,316,652 1,378,782 531,668 430,877 425,961 162,912 244,987 245,518 280,828 361,627 331,581 3,962,386 4,191,280 4,580,824 ------------------------ 447,815 479,507 479,201 386,985 512,513 536,904 340,102 374,060 442,402 209,282 237,504 273,951 229,083 376,657 386,270 905, 955 1,167, 280 1, 245, 612 6,481,608 7,338,801 7,945,164 X Change ~ Change 1989 1989 frog froID 1988 ; BODGBT ACTOAL Bariance 1988 Budget 1,126,496 1,210,000 1,436,328 226,328 27.5X 18.7X 1,205,101 ; 1,350,000 1,532,250 182,250 27.1X 13.5X 1,591,705 ,; 1,642,000 1,984,291 342,291 24.7X 20.8X 550,205 ; 450,000 550,000 100,000 .OX 22.2X 170,567 200,000 200,584 584 17.6X .3X 329,039 360,000 405,000 45,000 23.1X 12.SX 4,973,113 5,212,000 6,108,453 896,453 22.8X 17.2X -------------------------------------------------------------- 559,683 550,000 575,887 580,000 422,502 ; 440,000 291,204 ; 265,OD0 376,235 380,000 1,455,948 ; 1,455,000 8,654,572 8,882,000 6,108,453 896,453 K E,i,.l, Revised: 8/ 1/1989 TOWN OF VAIL REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX History and Budget 1989 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 ; 1989 1989 BUDGET MONTH --- ACTUAL --- -- ACTUAL ----------- ACTUAL --------- ACTUAL ----------- ACTUAL ----------- ACTUAL ----------- ACTUAL ------- -- ACTUAL ---- - ACTUAL BODGET ACTUAL VARIANCE ------ January --- 63,999 98,089 106,981 119,972 78,053 80,733 -- 101,374 --- --- 131,916 ----------- 96,119 - ----------- 84,193 ----------- 309,233 ---------- ~ 225,040 February 40,595 69,018 105,024 132,220 86,289 170,052 64,906 44,040 109,873 75,549 140,192 64,643 March 69,886 126,935 109,533 137,820 62,693 63,831 92,557 38,791 68,104 ; 73,345 145,957 72,612 April 76,855 94,653 65,900 103,526 173,321 90,396 182,743 95,554 179,671 100,585 151,070 50,485 May 42,738 84,324 54,663 90,599 96,006 228,673 98,651 120,.984 99,736 79,700 220,299 140,599 June 62,239 125,433 54,488 140,638 76,467 49,513 ?9,915 73,509 101,364 ; 70,858 122,466 51,608 July 49,367 186,110 104,262 68,539 157,598 88,528 70,441 47,949 126,537 82,209 125,675 43,466 w ~ Subtotal -- 405,679 - -- 784,562 ----- --- - 600,851 --------- 793,314 --- ----- 730,427 ----------- 771,726 - ----- 690,587 ---- -- 552,743 - 781,404 566,439 1,214,892 648,453 ------- August ----- 79,859 - - 115,499 71,282 --- .97,806 58,937 - ---- 32,860 ----- 100,182 ---- ------ 61,137 ----------- 109,315 -- ---------- 71,489 ----------- ---------- Septembr 59,800 113,992 49,332 96,746 64,671 48,516 108,167 78,819 116,557 70,625 October 108,510 154,000 42,498 122,546 88,732 109,633 93,860 124,291 177,360 99,052 November 102,623 107,768 81,698 91,385 105,109 74,909 89,047 114,839 241,888 ; 85,570 December --------- 142,662 -------- 133,867 ----------- 110,911 --------- 56,533 ----------- 81,890 ----------- 333,139 ----------- 106,695 ----------- 95,495 --- - ---- 192,947 ---- --- 106,824 TOTAL 899,133 1,409,688 956,572 1,258,330 1,129,766 1,370,783 1,188,538 - -- 1,027,324 -- -- 1,619,471 -- ---------- 1,000,000 ----------- 1,214,892 ---------- 648,453 ~ Includes $133,000 of delinquent taxes, penalty, and interest. 89QTRRPT TC)WN OF VAIL 1989 Financial Report Estimates to Year End 1989 ESTIMATE TC) VARIANCE GENERAL Ft1ND REVENtIE BtIDGET YEAR END C)VER/ (CINDER ) --------------------- Taxes -------------- - ---------- ------- - ----------- ------------- Property & C)wnership Taxes 1 , 782 , 40!01 1 , 786 , ClC1t! 3 , 600 Retail Sales Tax 4, 856, C10[- 5, 3801, [101(1 524, U00 Ski Lift Tax 636, OOC- 7501, C1ClC1 114, 000 Franchise Fees 347 , C1ClC! 411 , 010101 64 , aoa Penalty & Interest --------------------------------- 19,[10 CI ------------- 35,000 ------- - 16,000 7,64C-,4C1C- -- --- 8,362,C1tJC1 ------------- 721,600 Construction Fees 163,8(1(1 224,(101(1 60,200 Licenses & Permits 94 , 501(1 27 , ClC-C- ( 67 , 500 ) Charges for Services 2018 , 258 231 , CI C1[- 22 , 742 Transportation Centers 1 , 111 , 9601 1 , 1901 , t-[-CI 78 , C-40 Intergovernmental Revenue 687,16(! 765,(1(1[1 77,840 Fines & Forfeitures 130,900 18(1, (100 49, 100 Other 333,55(1 5[18,000 _ 174,450 TC)TAL GF REVENCIE 1 C1 37 C1, 528 _ 11 , 487 , C!C!C- _____________ 1 , 116 , 472 GENERAL FtIND EXPENDI TCIRES Town Officials 502, 114 5(14, 0(10 1, 886 Administrative Services 893,786 9(!1,(1(1(1 7,214 Community Development 6C)t),835 6(101,835 0 Police 1,926,925 1,917,(1(1(1 (9,925) Fire 831 , 133 835 , C1C-C- 3 , 867 Public Works 1,556,993 1,556,993 p Transit 1,342,-585 1,342,585 p Transportation Centers 812,832 812,832 0 Library 457 , (160 458 , C>[!t- 940 Contributions & Events 566,634 569,(1(1(1 2,366 Employee Benefits 55,5(1(1 55,5(1(1 0 Insurance 382 , 375 39(1 , C-CIC! 7 , 625 Contingency 28,946 28,946 0 Transfer to VMRD 543,758 543,758 0 Transfer to Parking Assmnt. Fund 2(10,(100 2C-C-,01GC1 p TOTAL GF EXPENDITURES 1(),701,476 1[1,715,449 13,973 SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) (33(1,948) 771,551 1,1012,499 4 1989 ESTIMATE TC) VARIANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUE BUDGET YEAR END C)VER/(UNDER) ---------- Retail Sales Tax ------------ 4 , 061 , C1C10 ------------ 4 , 48(1, QCIU -------------- 419 , 000 County Sales Tax 148, OC1C1 16(1, OC10 12, 000 Ski Lift Tax 636, (100 75(1, (1 C1 C1 114, 000 Recreation Amenities Fees 2C1, CIC1(1 45, C-C)CI 25, 000 Earnings on Investments 9C1, C1C1(1 9C1, CIC1(1 0 Other Income 62 , 695 64 , C-C-CI 1 , 305 UMTA Bus Grant 9C1C1, OCIO 900, 0(10 0 TOTAL REVEN[IE 5,917,695 6,489,(100 571,305 REVISED 1989 ESTIMATE TC) VARIANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS FtIND EXP. BtIDGET YEAR END LIVER/(UNDER) Communications S item tI Y^ Pgrade 4C1C), CICICI- -----4()C1, CJCIC-- -----------0- Street Maintenance & Improvements 1, 378, 4(1 C1 1, 378,4(!(1 0 Street Light Improvement 3C-, C1(ICI 3C1, C1(1(- 0 Misc. Bldg. Maintenance 9(1,00(1 90,000 0 Recreational Paths Maintenance 73, C1(1C1 73, (lC-C- 0 Parking Structures Projects 14(1, CJCICI 14(1, tJCICI 0 Ski Museum Interior Finishing 75, CIC1C1 75, CJC1(J 0 Ski Museum Demo & Redevelopment 22, CJ(1(J 22, CICJ(- 0 TC)V Shop Maint. & Improvements 8(1,000 BCJ,0001 0 Bus Interior Refurbishment 26, OC1C1 26, CJCICI 0 Children's Fountain Retrofit 3CI,C)UCI 25,(1(1(1 (5,000) Signage Program 76,500 76,5(10 0 Nature Center Roof 12, C1C-C) 12, (-C1(1 0 Fire Station Kitchen Remodels (3) 2C-, CI(1C1 2CI, CJCJCI 0 Muni Bldg. /Post Office Plan 6, 0C1U 6, OC-CI 0 tlnderground Electrical Lines 21 , C1C1C1 21 , C1C1(1 0 Design/Eng. Pulis Bridge Widening 20, (1C-0 2(J, OCICI 0 Design Library Wall 1 , 5(1(- 1 , 5CJC) 0 Arena Heat Exchanger 9, CIC1C1 9,(1(1(1 0 W . Gore Cr . Bridge Engineering 17 , 5(1Ci 17 , 5C1() 0 W. Meadow Dr. Survey 5', CI CI CI 5, C1(ICI 0 Communications Equip roll-forward 4,70(1 4,7(1(1 0 Fire Station Bay roll-forward 1U,25CJ 10,25(1 0 Dobson Arena Safety roll-forward 6,9(1(1 6,9(1(1 0 Build. Maint. roll-forward 24, C1C1U 24, C1C10 p Info Booth Expansion roll-forward 5,4CIC) 5,4(1 C1 0 Muni Bldg. Remodel roll-forward 7,8(1(1 7,80(1 p Village Improv. Dist roll-forward 25, CJC-C- 25,(1 (IC- 0 Signage Project roll-forward 42, CICIC! 42,(1 (1 f1 0 Bus Grant Match roll-forward 253 ,CICIC) 283 , C1CIC1 30 , 000 Bus Grant Accounting Change 900, C1(1C1 900, [-(ICJ 0 Unallocated Project Budget 13,245 CI (13,245) Transfer to Computer Project 240, CIC1(1 24(1, (IC1(I 0 Transfer to Debt Service 2,693,76(1 2,693,76(1 _ 0 - ----------- TUTAL EXPENDITURES ----------- 6,758,955 ------------- 6,77(1,71(1 ------------- 11,755 5 1989 ESTIMATE TC1 VARIANCE LOTTERY FUND BUDGET YEAR END OVER/(UNDER) -----------------------------9,C1ClC)--------5,0(1(1=====_________ REVENtIE ( 4 , 000 ) EXPENDITURES 9,000 5,(100 (4,000) St1RPLUS/ (SHORTFALL ) (1 (! p REVISED 1989 ESTIMATE TC) VARIANCE REAL ESTATE TRANS TAX FtIND BtIDGET YEAR END C)VER/ (tINDER ) REVENUE RETT Taxes 1,O1C1,CltlC) 1,8ClC),tltlCl 790,000 Golf Course Lease/VMRD _ 7C1, ClClC1 7C1, C!C!(J 0 Earnings on Investments --------------------------------- 105, ClCJO ----- 18(1, CJ C1 C1 75, 000 TOTAL RETT REVENUE -------- 1 , 185 , UOC! ------------- 2 , 05CJ , 0100 ------------- 865 , CJ00 EXPENDITURES Purchase of C)pen Space 395 , 932 34(1, 932 ( 55 , OCJC1) Transfer to Debt Service Fund 793,(!87 793,[187 0 Projects 1,ClCl1,5C1C1 1,C-Cl1,F,ClC1 0 TOTAL RETT EXPENDITURES 2,190,519 2,135,519 (55,()00) SURPLtIS/(SHORTFALL) (1,(1()5,519) (85,519) 920,000 1989 ESTIMATE TC) VARIANCE HEAVY E~ltIIPMENT FUND - ------ BUDGET YEAR END OVER/(UNDER) ------------- REVENt1E ------------- 1, 209 , 700 ------------ 1 , 2C-9 , 7C-0 ------------- 0 EXPENDITURES 1,216,34(1 1,216,34(1 0 SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) (6,64(1) (6,64(1) 0 1989 ESTIMATE TO VARIANCE SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT Ft]ND BUDGET YEAR END C)VER/(UNDER) REVENUE - Parking Assessments 4Cl,ClCJC1 35,(1(1(! (5,000) Daily Parking Revenue 235, OCJC! 235, C-(!C! 0 Earnings on Investments 15,00(! 40,(1(!0 25,000 Transfer from General Fund ------------------ 2UCJ, C10C1 2UCJ, (!(1(! 0 ----- TOTAL SPAF REVENUE ------------ 4901, C!tlC1 ------------- 51(1, t!C-C! ------------- 2CJ, 000 EXPENDITtRES 250, ClUC! 250, 0(-CI 20, 000 6 MNTHRPT Revised: 8/ 3/89 TOWN OF VAIL FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE REVENUE SUMMARY As of June 30, 1989 (Operating Funds Only) 1988 1989 1988 JU N YTD % 1989 JUN YTD % OVER FUND -------------------------- JUNE YTD OF ---------- TOTAL JUNE YTD OF BUDGET (UNDER) GENERAL FUND --- -------- ----------- ----------- -------- Sales Tax 2,858,346 55.4% 3,341,441 68.8% 13.4% Property Taxes 1,163,()71 68.4..°i 1,329,476 74.6% 6.1% Ski Lift Tax 469,423 74.1% 58(!,451 91.3% 17.1% Trans. Centers 75(),689 67.8% 813,652 73.2% 5.4% Charges for Services 1(13,624 44.5% 1(11,684 48.8% 4.4% Other -------------------------- 1 , C)26 , 287 ------------- 5C! . 9% ----- 875 , (199 49.3% ( 1 . 6 % ) GENERAL Ft]ND TOTAL 6,371,44(! ---- 58.7% ---------- 7,()41,8()3 ----------- 67.9% -------- 9.2% CAPITAL PRC)JECTS FUND Sales Tax 2,185,186 45.1% 2,792,785 68.8% 23.7% Ski Lift Tax 469,423 74.1% 58(),451 91.3% 17.1% Uther 81 , Cl69 2C! . 2% 167 , 617 65 . C!% 44.8 % Transfer from G . F . ------------------------ C) -- . C!% CI . C!% . 0 % CAPITAL PRCIJECTS TC)TAL ------------ 2 , 735 , 678 --------- 45 .2% ------------ 3 , 54C! , 853 ---------- 71 .5 % -------- 26.2 % LOTTERY TC)TAL C! . C!% C- . C!% . 0% GRAND TC)TAL 9, 1Cl7, 118 53.9% 1C), 582, 656 69.C!% 15.2% 7 MNTHRPT Revised: 8/ 3/89 TC)WN C)F VAIL FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE EXPENDITIIRE StIMMARY As of June 3U, 1989 (Operating Funds C)nly) 1988 1989 1988 JI1N YTD % 1989 JtIN YTD % OVER Ft1ND ------------------------- JtINE YTD ----------- C)F TC)TAL J[INE YTD C)F EI]DGET ( TINDER ) GENERAL FIND ----------- ----------- ----------- -------- Town C)fficials 289,586 51.5% 255,5CiC! 5[1.9% ( .6%) Administrative Serv. 4Cl6,176 49.3% 447,598 5C).1% .8% Community Development 218,547 49.8% 243,47C1 4C).5% ( 9.3%) Police 835,367 47.3..°i 938,673 48.7% 1.4% Fire 383,492 47.C)% 4()5,411 48.8% 1.8% Public Works 751,381 51.1% 773,121 49.7% ( 1.5%) Transit 616 , C)52 51 . C!% 715 , C134 53.3% 2 .2% Transportation Centers 348,741 45.C)% 392,539 48.3% 3.3% Library 2C-7 , Ci44 48.2% 2(14 , 915 44.8% ( 3 . 4% ) Contrib. & Events 314,727 62.5% 469,98C! 82.9% 2t).4% Employee Benefits 32,345 51.3% 21,631 39.0% ( 12.3%) Insurance 1 C-7 , 536 23.1% 141 , 457 37 . C)% 13.9% Contingency () , ()% () . C!% U% Trans. to C)ther Funds 30C), UUC- 64.7% 2UC), UClC! 1ClC). U% 35.3% Transfer to VMRD ------------------------- U ------ .Ci% 2Cl3,593 37.4% 37.4% GENERAL FtIND TC)TAL ----- 4 , 81 C- , 994 ----------- 49.2% ----------- 5 , 412 , 922 ----------- 5 C! . 6% -------- 1 . 4% CAPITAL PRC)JECTS Capital Projects 521 , 9C)9 25 . [)% 1 , Cl9C-, 896 2S . 6% 3 . 6% Transfers 1,111,036 31.9% 34,59C) 1.2% ( 3C).8%) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAPITAL PRC)JECTS TC)TAL 1,632,945 29.3% 1,125,486 16.7% ( 12.7%) LOTTERY TC)TAL C) . C)% C) . U% U% ----------------------------------------=------------------------------------ GRAND TC)TAL 6 , 443 , 939 42 . C)% 6 , 538 , 4Cl8 37.4% ( 4.5%) 8 CONTING TC)WN OF VAIL COIINCIL CONTINGENCY REPORT as of August 2, 1989 ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------- O1-C11C1Cl-52857 Original Budget $10(1,000 LISES 01 -610(1 -511(18 VMRD Separation Expenses 31,404 O1 -C11C1 C1 -52858 Cleanup Day 9,700 01 -11(1(1 -52101 NLC FAIR Committee Attendance 1,600 O1 -61(1(1 -51108 Symphony of Sports 16,(100 O1 -C11C1 CI -52150 Employee Beach Boys Ticl~ets 11,(100 Ol -83(1(1 -52831 U.S. Disabled Ski Team Donation 1,000 01 -01(10 -52858 Tents for Street Entertainment 1,(100 O1 -61(1(1 -511(18 Return of Coors Classic Funding (14,100) O1 -83(1(1 -52831 Vail Stage Race 1 , (100 O1 -4200 -521()1 Burnett USSR Trip 5,150 O1 -83(1(1 -52839 Vail Community Theatre 2,8(10 O1 -83()0 -52831 Pro Kick-C)ff 3 , UUO O1 -- -83(1(1 ----- -52831 ------- Vail Rugby Team -----------------=----==-- 1,500 ---------- Total Contingency tlsed- ------------ 71,054 Council Contingency Remaining: $28,946 9 ~, laws o yai 9 42 vves4 meado~r drive veil, Colorado 89657 (303)476-2200 VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 1989 BUDGET - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS fd~e departrnen4 This proposal will explain the circumstance, needs, options and justification for purchase of a single fire apparatuso SUMMARY The Vail Fire Department is requesting permission to initiate design and order a 1989 combination 75 foot ladder truck / pumper trucko This truck would be used as a first response vehicle and would be manufactured according to specificationso Included in the specifications are a 75 foot telescoping ladder, a four passenger enclosed cab as required by NeFeP,Ao Standard 1500, a short wheel base, a 1500 gallon per minute pump and all-wheel drive train, This vehicle has been an element of the master plan developed in 1980, has been listed on the five year capital improvement budget for the past four years (included in 1984 budget preparations for fiscal 1985), and has received approval in previous budgetso - The cost of this vehicle is estimated to be approximately $350,000° Inflation has driven the estimated cost of this vehicle up from $225,000 in 1982 to $350,000 for contracts signed in fiscal 1989° Price increases are subject to market conditions, including labor costs, raw materials cost, availability, and customer demarbd, and may occur at any timed The amount of time required to design and manufacture this piece of apparatus is approximately 15 monthso Costs are determined at the point of contract but no funds are required until deliveryo PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 2 BACKGROUND VEHICLES The Vail Fire Department currently has four fire engines on line for response, plus one engine that is warehoused at the Town Shop as a "reserve apparatuso" Two engines are based in each stationo One ladder truck is stationed at the Main Vail station and responds to fires on an as-needed basiso Projected life expectancy of a fire truck is estimated to be 20 yearso This figure is based on an assumption that no single piece of equipment will be required to respond on each and every call, but that the engines will alternated The twenty year life expectancy assumes a piece of apparatus will be held in reserve status for at least the last five yearso This standard has been widely recognized on the national level and is reflected in manufacturer°s specifications, design, insurance underwriting standards, and has been accepted by the International City Managers Association, National Fire Protection Association and the National Fire Equipment Manufacturer's Association, The fire department has developed and submitted a recommended replacement schedule based on the age of equipment, number of miles, usage, and conditiono Equipment was classified as first line, reserve or ready reservee Each apparatus was evaluated and assigned an anticipated date for replacemento The schedule of fire apparatus currently owned by the Town of Vail is as followsa ENGINE 413 - 1985, 1500 GPM ENGINE 410 - 1982, 1000 GPM ENGINE 412 - 1978, 750 GPM ENGINE 411 - 1972, 1000 GPM TRUCK 431 - 1972, LADDER ENGINE 416 - 1964, 750 GPM (RESERVE) VEHICLE RESPONSE ASSIGNMENT The first response vehicle from the East Vail station is Engine 4100 It was built in 1982 and has been a first response vehicle since it arrivedo The last five years have been by far the busiest in Vail's history and has subjected Engine 410 to more use and a disproportionate amount of wear and tear compared to the other pieces of apparatuso It is proposed that the new truck would replace 410 as a first response unit out of the East Vail station, Engine 410 would remain at the East Vail station and retain it's full complement of equipment, thus enabling it°s utilization as a quick response fire-rescue unit for calls to Vail Passo This will tend PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 3 to extend the longevity of 410 and allow an improved service level response capability for the citizens and guestse THE LADDER TRUCK The ladder truck, 431 , is now sixteen year old e It was tested for re-certification in 1984 but failed to meet minimum criteriao Funds for repair were approved in a subsequent budget year and the certification was completed in 19870 The next re- certification is scheduled for 19900 The ladder truck currently provides the only means by which we can reach the roof of any building over three stories above grade, project a fire stream down onto and into a fire from an elevated position, and provides the only means of access to most chimney fireso The purchase and utilization of a combination ladder truck / pumper will not eliminate or reduce the need for the ladder truck, but will compliment it's primary function of allowing access to various portions of buildings and provide for elevated hose stream applicationo The ladder truck is mandated by the presence of buildings over three storieso It will eventually have to be replaced due to age and deterioration, RESERVE APPARATUS Under the assumption of a twenty year useful life, the schedule would indicate Engine 416 should be retired from reserve statuse It may be appropriate to consider keeping the engine due to it°s excellent cosmetic restoration completed two years ago and the fact that 416 was Vail°s first fire engineo It should also be noted that Engine 411 is now sixteen years old and could be placed in reserve statuso Engine 412 is two- thirds the way through it°s useful life cycle and has less pumping capacity than Engine 411a It is recommended that 412 be designated the reserve apparatus or used as a trade-in towards the cost of the proposed vehicles If 412 was traded in, Engine 411 should become the designated reserve apparatuso UTILITY The advantages of a combination ladder truck / pumper allow on-duty personnel multiple options not available with an ordinary ladder truck or a straight forward pumper trucks Most fire service pumpers are technically referred to as "triple combination pumpersm" This term is used to reflect the engine°s ability to pump water, carry hose and carry water in an on-board tanko The proposal is for what is commonly referred to as a "quint," meaning it has five basic functionse A recent survey of metropolitan fire chiefs indicates the concept of utilizing a quint is becoming increasingly more popularo With tight municipal PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 4 budgetso reduced engine company staffing levels, pressure from citizen groups and the need to maximize firefighting capabilities of limited resourceso the chiefs indicated a quint provides for multiple options and increased response capability at a reduced costo In addition to having all the capabilities of a "triple combination pumper,11 it has the added features of a ladder capable of performing rescue work, placing firefighters on a roof or near any other inaccessible high point such as is often needed to fight chimney fires, and has the tactical advantage of providing a second elevated master streamo Elevated master streams provide the advantage of being able to more accurately direct large fire fighting hose streams for maximum tactical advantaged The design of this combination ladder truck / pumper would enhance the firefighting capability of the limited number of on-duty firefighters stationed at the East Vail Fire S tationo STAFFIlVG ISSUES Providing and maintaining governmental services for the general public has become increasingly difficult in light of public concern to "hold the line" on costs a We are aware of the impacts of increasing property taxes and the demand for cost - effective serviceso We are also aware of the public's expectations when they report a fire or call for emergency assistanceo The fire service across the United States has been impacted by the effects of these demand so Documented studies conducted by various government agencies in association with the National Science Foundation, Institute for Urban Affairso management associations, and public accountability groups indicate the optimum number of firefighters on an engine should be fiveo The studies also evaluated the impacts of-reduced firefighter staffing levels when the number of engine company personnel is reduced to four and three o The results indicate a reduction of 40~ in effectiveness when engine company staffing is reduced from five to four and a 60~ reduction when the staffing level drops to three firefighterse Strong concerns where given both for firefighter safety and almost negligible effectiveness when the staffing level dropped to twoo The general agreement was that an engine with only two firefighters was almost ineffectual and presents undue safety concernso Given the limited number of on-duty staff , it would appear to be cost effective and productive to supplement the abilities of the existing firefighting personnel by use of properly designed equipment, appropriate with our philosophy of quick attack and rapid suppressiono PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 5 FIRE INSURANCE e In the spring of 1988, the Vail Fire Department received the results of a survey conducted by the Insurance Services Office (IoSoO,), Z~he Insurance Services Office is an organization that provides insurance underwriters with a quantified valve (grade) intended to reflect a community's ability to fight a conflagrationo The survey is based on a schedule of points assigned for each elemento The schedule is extremely complex and involves a multitude of factors and variablesm The quantities and arrangement of those elements, including geographic locations of fire stations, management practices, staffing, apparatus, type and amount of equipment carried on various apparatus, radio communications, water supply, and the number, height and size of buildings, are but a few of the factors considered in the evaluationo A prefatory statement in IoSoOo's schedule states the intent is not not to dictate, recommend or describe how a community should address any specific fire problem, the level of fire protection, the number of trucks or firefighters, or in any way be construed as attempting to tell a community what they should doo A classification of IoSoOe is intended to be used as a risk factor for insurance underwriting practices onlyo Vail received a favorable grade as a result of the survey conducted in the fall of 19880 The projected impact from this improved grading was a reduction in fire insurance rates for affected business owners in Vaile Depending on the size, location, type construction and similar variables, reductions of 3$ to 7~ could have been realizedo Additional reductions in insurance rates were missed by a mere forty-four hundredths of a percentage pointo Analysis of the details of the grading indicate that some options exist to recover the difference between our existing grade and the next improved grade, subsequently resulting in additional insurance savingso Elements of our local fire protection system were identified and values were assigned reflecting IoSaO,'s evaluationo An element not receiving full credit is in the field of dispatch communications equipment, addressed in part by the capitol improvements budget item passed for fiscal 19890 Another area lies in the field of fire equipments Deficiency points were noted due to the lack of a ladder truck in the East Vail area> The distance between the East Vail station and the Main Vail station was in excess of the maximum allowed in order to give ladder service credit for most of the PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 6 East Vail areao Vail only received credit for being able to furnish 60~ of the town with the services of a ladder truck o The purchase and assignment of a new piece of equipment having ladder truck capabilityo an elevated master streamp and pumping capacity would enhance the probability of achieving additional credit for geographic distributiono An improved grade from I,SoO> and a subsequent decrease in insurance rates would be dependent upon the number of points credited for an additional ladder truck minus the impact of the other variables in the schedules Those other variables include not having the required number of staff responding with the apparatus and deficiency points for equipment required by NeFoP,Ao but not carried on the apparatuso IMPACT ON INSURANCE RATES Estimates as to the total projected reduction in fire insurance premiums are impossible to derives Rates are determined by a number of independent factors beyond the control of the Fire Departmento Single family homes would probably not be affected by any grade change between IoSoO, Class 1 and Class 6o Vail enjoyed a Class 6 rating for several years before last year°s reduction to a Class 50 Howevero those insurance companies using IoSaOo Guidelines would see an additional recommended reduction of 10~ for buildings with a complete fire sprinkler system, a 5~ recommended reduction for mercantile buildings of wood frame and masonry constructiono and fire resistive buildings would receive a recommended reduction of 1 ~ , Recommended reductions in fire insurance premiums (estimated to comprise 20~ of total insurance cost) would be applicable to commercial buildings throughout Vail, and would not be limited just to the areas of town most affected by the assignment of a ladder/pumper to the East Vail stations SERVICE LEVELo The level of service available to residents of the city would be improved by the purchase and deployment of an apparatus having the ability to deliver more firefighting power without increasing the staffing assigned to the East Vail stations The improvements would be primarily in the ability to use higher fireflows in less time, with an elevated high volume fire stream and a ladder capable of reaching most buildings six stories in heighto As Vail matures, we see an increase in the number of fires requiring the ability to deliver large volumes of water quicklye Aside from the recent series of fires attributed to non-accidental causes, Vail continues to experience a slow but steady increase in the number of fires requiring a General Alarm assignmento This PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 7 pattern is expected to continue over time as buildings get older, LIMITING FACTORS Incentives given to developers, such as zero property lines, balcony enclosures, increased density, and an occasional encroachment onto public right-of-way are necessary and vital to Vail°s continued successo The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan encourages a tight cluster arrangement of buildings® The incentives have been proposed and used in various locations in the Village, Lionshead, several special development districts and in the residential neighborhoodsa The Fire Department understands and appreciates these developmental aspects, but also appreciates the imposed limitations in terms of delivering fire protections In the interest of continuing to provide the citizens, property owners, and guests the level of fire protection they have come to expect, we need to adapt our selection of fire apparatus to deal with these factorso The Fire Department°s ability to access buildings and the ability to set up fire suppression operations has been impactedo Fire codes, building codes and typical subdivision regulations usually specify access roads be a minimum 20 feet in width with a 20 foot set back to the buildings° The area required to set up the existing ladder truck is frequently more than is availablea While the truck itself is only eight and one half feet wide from mirror to mirror, the operation width required to connect fire hoses. to the master stream requires another seven to ten feet off either side of the trucks In addition, to utilize the maximum extension and height of the existing ladder truck, it must be positioned approximately 20 feet from the side of the building, Adding these factors together, the required width to raise the ladder with the master stream appliance is 28 feete Unless a structure has a 20 foot set back from the edge of the pavement, and a roadway that is at least 20 feet wide, the existing ladder truck may not be effectively utilizedo The proposed vehicle, because of it's inherent design, will only require a twelve foot width to accommodate the truck and the stabilizing bars (called out-riggers), and an additional five feet to make the fire hose connections to the hydrants The total operation width will be about 17-18 feeto The new truck could be utilized where the existing ladder truck cannoto SERVICE DEMAND The number of fires appear to be continually shifting from the commercial sector towards the residential neighborhoodso This fact is partially attributable to the frequency of remodels, improvements in fire detection systems, the installation of fire sprinkler systems and fire prevention functions .associated with commercial buildingso PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 8 Some elements of residential construction have, however, become increasingly more difficult to overcomes Having recently gained considerable experience fighting fires in large residential structures, we have come to appreciate the great potential benefit a combination ladder truck and pumper could provided Some of the homes in the Vail Valley are constructed on sloped hillsidese The ability to access the rear portion of a large single family home or any building constructed on a slope, is severely compromised if snow pack is presento The physical requirements necessary to manually drag fire hose uphill in deep snow for a distance typically 200-300 feet are beyond practical limitso The specification requiring the new truck be equipped with °'all wheel drive11 is in response to our need to access all points within the city limits despite road grades, weather conditions, or the presence of icy road surfaceso While deep snow has not been a factor due the public works department's fine job of keeping the roads plowed, icy road conditions in specific areas of Vail do pose a strong area of concerno All wheel drive has been a standard specification on the last two fire engines and as been proven to save time over installing and removing tire chains, decreases damage to vehicles from broken tire chains, increases the maneuverability and safety of the vehicle and allows uncompromised ability to respond to any portion of the citye The first response vehicle assigned to the East Vail station has a water pumping capacity of 1000 gallons per minuted The proposal specifies the new truck will have a pumping capacity of 1500 gallons per minute; a fifty percent increase in pumping capacity on the first response vehicleo A combination ladder truck/pamper provides additional advantages in that it requires fewer personnel to deploym The ladder truck stationed at the Main Vail Fire Station requires approximately 20 minutes to setup and attach the required hoses, water supply, nozzle and associated equipment necessary to utilize it°s master stream appliances A minimum of three firefighters must be assigned to the existing ladder truck to accomplish this tasko In addition, because the existing ladder truck is not equipped with a pump, a water supply, or the equipment required to connect to a fire hydrant, an engine company must also be committed to make the necessary connections, supply water and pressures A combination ladder truck/pamper can be efficiently set up with two firefighters, thus allowing other firefighters to assume other critical dutieso The amount of time required to place a combination unit in service is approximately one-half that required for the existing ladder trucko PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 9 FIRE DAMAGE The amount of damage from a single fire occurring in a private home in Vail can easily run in excess of $250,000 and is not uncommon to approach one half million dollars, The projected cost of the proposed vehicle is less than the fire damage caused by any one of several fires we experienced last yearn The cost of a new combination ladder truck / pumper is significant, but the return on the dollar over the useful life of the investment, plus the prof ected reduction in direct dollar loss from fire as a result of this piece of equipment, should prove to be a financially prudent and wise use of public fundso OPERATIONAL PHILOSOPHY We have long held that the key to successful fire suppression was based upon the precepts of early detection and rapid suppressiono In the absence of properly installed and maintained automatic fire detection and suppression systems, the amount of fire damage will be directly related to the amount of time required to extinguish the fired This is of course a function of training, experience, the number of personnel and the type and amount of available equipmento Vail can pride itself on the quality, depth and experience of it°s firefighting personnelo We have one of the best trained and most professional fire departments in the State of Coloradoa Our personnel are dedicated and committede A majority of the paid personnel have been here ten years or morem We are asking for permission to order the equipment we feel, in our professional opinion, will allow us to better serve the guests, citizens and property owners of Vail, ALTERNATIVESe Within the framework of Vail°s specific needs, our local conditions and desire for fiscal responsibility, we have listed four alternatives for consideration and facts pertaining to eacho OPTION # 1 - RETROFIT AN EXISTING VEHICLE This option provides for retrofiting an existing engine with a fifty foot telescoping boom with attached automatic nozzleo The functional limitations of pump capacity, gross vehicle weight, and other elements indicate Engine 411 is the most likely candidate for retrofito This option is not desirable considering the age of the vehicle, limitations imposed due to drive train, braking system, the two stage fire pump (compromises the use of volume or pressure), the fact that we would lose use of the vehicle for approximately one year, and it would not provide for additional ladder capabilitye It does not provide for all wheel drive, does not solve the issue of outdated reserve apparatus and makes no PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 10 provision for future rotation of equipment from line to reserve statuse This option is not recommended by the Fire Department nor Town of Vail Fleet Managemento The projected cost of retrofiting 411 is $125, 000, OPTION # 2 - PURCHASE A USED VEHICLE This option is not well defined due to the nature of the proposalo The market for used fire equipment is generally based on the east coasts The issue of body rust is of ten brought up as a concern when looking at east coast equipment and found to exist more often than noto The integrity of mechanical systems cannot be assured, the age of the vehicle, maintenance history, and number of engine hours and mileage are not controlledo Purchasing used equipment may be simply buying someone else's problemo The availability of a used piece of equipment cannot be assumed, let alone one with the equipment or features required, Timing is subject to availability and purchase usually requires submission by sealed bibo Subsequently, no cost estimates are availablee The Vail Fire Department and Public Works Fleet Management does not recommend this option eithero OPTION # 3 - PURCHASE A NEW 65 FOOT TELESQUIRT This option provides an alternative to the purchase of a combination ladder truck/pumpero Blueprints for a vehicle similar to this option are in our possession and have been reviewedo A similar vehicle has been physically inspected and taken for a test drive through the streets of Vail and appears to be able to functiono The details on the component features will be subject to review and verification if the authorization to proceed is givens In essence, the option is a .1989 model fire truck, complete with a 65 foot telescoping boom, on which is attached an automatic remote-controlled, high-volume master stream appliance, capable of being operated from the ground by one persons The fire pump is expected to have a rating of 1500 gallons per minuted This vehicle will not meet NoFaPoAo or ImSoOe definitions as a ladder trucko Partial credit may be allowed by IeSoOe for an elevated master streamo The drive train will entail an all wheel drive, single rear axle, with adequate gross vehicle weight capacity to accommodate an internal water tank, a complement of fire hose and associated equipment as specified in national standardso This vehicle could function as a fire pumper and provide for a 65 foot elevated master streamo ~- PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 11 The estimated cost for this vehicle is $320,000° An additional appropriation for necessary equipment as required by I,S,Oo and NeFeP,Aa will be needed in 1990 or 1991 or may be ordered in the purchase contracto This equipment would be comprised of such items as the fire hose, ground ladders, two way radio, and equipment normally carried on a fire trucko We also have the option of trading in Engine 4120 The value of the trade- in vehicle would be determined through negotiationso OPTION # 4 - PREFERRED CHOICE The last option is here for consideration as the optimum choicee The purchase of a new piece of equipment allows for proper selection of features and equipment, opportunity to negotiate. elements from a cost effective standpoit:t, and the ability to coordinate mechanical aspects with Public Works Fleet Management staff o Coordination with Fleet Management allows the selection of such items as are common to existing vehicles w ithin the f leeta This reduces the need and associated cost of stocking additional spare parts, additional costs associated with repair and maintenance, time required to learn and secure information on different types of transmissions, internal electrical, hydraulic and related systemso Incremental comparison indicates an additional 15~ increase in master stream elevation, the addition of a fully rated ladder as acknowledged by IoSoOo, all the components of a fully rated pumper, including on board water tank, ground ladders and a full complement of fire hose, could be obtained for approximately 8,5~ over the cost of a 65 foot telesquirto It includes a 75 foot ladder with a pre-piped master stream, mounted on a single rear axle all wheel drive short wheel base chassis, an internal high volume fire pump (1500 gopam.), water tank and capability to perform as a ladder truck and a fire pumperm The length of the vehicle has been determined and would fit in the East Vail stationo It's ability to reach would be limited to about the roof of a six story building, provide for a second ladder truck, provide for reasonable access to most buildings in wail, function as a back-up apparatus for our existing ladder truck, allow for eventual rotation of the existing ladder truck, and help equalized the service distribution in terms of response time, area of primary response, and geographic distribution of ladder truck service (assuming adequate operation width and access to the building), ~~°~ PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE APPARATUS PAGE 12 The purchase of this vehicle would provide the greatest potential for maximizing credit during a re-evaluation of Vail°s I< S oO, grade, projected to be done in 1991 after delivery of the apparatuso The estimated cost of this vehicle (new)-is $350,000, CONCLUSIONo We feel that the systematic and routine rotation of fire fighting apparatus presents the general public with the best assurance that the right equipment will be available at the right times It is apparent that vail has been experiencing a slow but steady increase in the number of firese This pattern is considered normal and is expected to continue as growth continues, density increases and the buildings become old ere We have presented options and alternatives to address the immediate needs in terms of vehicle replacement and given a perspective on the status of fire fighting apparatus as it now ex istse It is apparent that Vail must address the need to keep and maintain an adequate number of fire fighting vehicles with sufficient pumping capacity, maneuverability, ladder capability and tactical potentials The concept of a multi-use vehicle capable of both ladder truck and engine company operations is viable, proven, and cost effective, The need for this type of apparatus was anticipated several years ago and has been included in capital improvement budgets since 1984a The truck was an element of the vehicle replacement plan instituted and approved by the city council in recent annual budgetse We feel that the purchase of a 75 foot combination ladder truck / fire pumper, to be ordered in 1989 , scheduled for delivery in 1990, presents the most cost effective and productive solution to current needso RECD AUG - 3 ~9~9 (~lil Li1~i11C~' }t_?L~II-L:t~..~rl], Li_li„1`-~, i.Ilf~ 1~:yC.i::lf~P f..~?l:~r ltl fit'=.i1 ~"~i:rft~lf-,~il~f't St.,FS1 t1C.1-'~'~i N E ;-iC,f;;-}71 r: ttt, i r,~Ii r!j~_. _~I~ ;':aLtf=.rj .~>.^!11121 jlr1~21#. .,~it.ll }!tt?,.?i ~I-c:Y ~3.ii~ _~.Iii_i.t~tJ.I- '_31T,1ir,; i ~-_~ - ~- - ~ _ ~':Fil2 ,rr ~_21Y i].ryi ~:'rii =;<:~U.t:;;?~1 r~.T~Ii}. 1~i;' ~.;_ti;.'~ F:'I~1.C:~ 1I1 F~3.1I. ^-•r- r ~'= r r TFi~I~'' -1 ~ , ~ ,, ~ .=•Tt* ? ' • t~3.i1. 1'- I1~-., .Il _i it 'i-iT~~_._1CI1~'.1 ~12.3.Y . ., Ti c.;Z,.l Eil._1~~.fic:~, ~~,fk,t, !'F:. ~v ~r:3.1~3.iici, r'.~I~.i~ 1 .,tl-,~t. ,~ ;~ c tl Ti .~ F`-. N~ ~i:. ~-1_I ~ . i •i •l - r)iY Y }~-•h-S 77:. r.}} r :~• ~ rv -t ~• . + _ ~.i=] Cir iS~--: ...t....~ l!.! ..•Iilt.. .t.-. IIl +_Sl~• i}l'.? ~ : Clll., I?1 '.'^.'1'.i.111Y, tt '::':Yli[1l~tt,3+~1~:?Ii tjl Iiifr ' 'l~. r ~ ~~rr..~..~it - TF•~+ ~F ~i''rr +-i;-• TT'~i t r=, SriFl~r -; ~ r+.j• ~:1r: I-ilc. 1(,Ilo.I _:.1:,;.;,_.I~ tc> t' _r.zl rlli:+:~r I-~,5,_ I~r_l,,' !. ..c_~1~,~~.:~ ~I-cIl1 t.21:_ ,+ ~:~IC+ ~'~I}_'~~lt' ~~~~ ~a r• r• !~flctrll?1!L?Ilc~~11t?: . ~,r!r?s-c?~tirr~,t.t~1~1 ~~r- 1 ri+i r?t,,TFNr t-~_?rr~ 1? 1 rFN t-a ,::Ir, T N N<<. N N,: c_:,:? ,N N I_ . t ~ , _ r fi.. ~ _ _ ._ t t_r1T.r l :,_r:; ...-n..t,t.:, _~ tc; : t_nr. _ t.;. _ _ i_ 1. _ _ + _ _ j_ _ _. r _ ~ _ _ 1_ _ ` 111 C,21E' ~~I11~3L~'U.i- ~?FNI1rS. `'tit ~' 21:3. v ~ ~~lrN.~t;~F rtwi~'1~F~~ Ylltd-irS Iridil (_ftlil~sd"ill~~, _ : r'!~ilI1J 7 '! ctlllct, 1 Hilt::. ~.J it i3 j. rt r~ + NT. t.F '. ; tj~i - L ' ,~' ~ '~ 1~ ~' ,,ty rr t , rr- - I:tt"i, i~( -';~7 t''~i '~" i, 11 'i ~~I-t:., t'v'1. "-~t':tiLlc t•~~, ttriri 12" '.Il. S u^ts t' C•t'1 f T;7 ftuC• rf N( f1~Y NaC~ Y~ ~ tlt Yl`} r•' ff t.?S}"r ?~ .~ r u rF~i tY_ T 1 ~~ r_~ r~_ ~:..1_~: _~~.:_,i_rl.: _~. _. Ifi.:_.•~11.,. trl.: ~_:..:~ltit_lrl., ~..:~~,j.:1.r:r, :,.I:~t:~ '-i..Ir~..:._,,;i.I~I~i~: r'},~ it't,::t ~t't•~. ~'~t1r~ 1 ir~:t~F1r1~. r_r~ ~;r 1ti~I1 r11;~TFH2-1=. TtYlli~it~ j'_f~~ Tr_r~I''';r,~l~` ~~.6~i_'llf. tflt'+q:~ ~,',*t~r~r i>,~.I-tit_11>:~.t~~_i iI-1 t.I-1N :~.tt.':~rl: 1. _!'_?. ~' ;~. ~!Ict : '3':.~ttt~:ii _~, - 4 i1Ii1~~: t~ ','~~~~: i:.. _}~_a:v IGIY.~~ l~li' lI 1 ~4~'.itt' +.-~ 'f5'31C'11 11.L' ~ l.I ttSl''•'1 ~1 u f_} '~`--~ r y T ~.TYr ~i ~ .t ,:.:1 11 ~}" r ~~ t. T _ ~ { '"~, ~1 :~. E?ill iJ.I:11~ t?Ii {TF =t 1.11 ~. l~ ~1(. Ll l'~il }l l.:t:T r!~'I'1I11J r,+ m _ ~ r r '1 `~ r ~t.Tl,s 'µ + }1~ '/, ,~G~ f 'r'te t-~~.._ i t}-,~ _,~_f } t'r+.rtiYtf f-r'= .. i_ ~:•_ ,~- . fi:j.k~._ r. ~,ti.t. ~....ri ? ~tll a ~ _~ ~~.IT- tl ~ Yom; ~r~ ~_~~•.~ 2...... ~ ~~ .~~.._~~ :~._, ~ ~T - ~ ~ t1 f:' I-i+C,~',f_rllf~isl~ tIl',~t t'}"`t-"~.i~ 1-i'irlt. S,:,FF~t-i=~ rril4-f::~SF Tf~rt- rlif~:=,~.llt-L t,'iI- r,Ht-~.t_rt1C.1 . ~ ~ :._ ._ .: .s. ._ ._ ._.•_ •_. .: _ .. _. 1' ~- '' 1` "' r - 1- y` - - 'f~.i_lm ri=':r~c;~Ili;~~'ii ttl~~.t tt1E'22" t.l'ir':_; ~,'~Fri'~: iG'~ i:i_S271t;~].i1FC2 k::rit._~lltr: ~t21<~ r~1c~,J.~U.i' r j. ii(~.s, o i~t'ti'Il i;<}I'~<~'I"~3.tr fiGi.'IC. ? 1.`3,`T c?~:'vIl 171TJit];~i.j is'i- Ilic1'Il~{F I7-L.3.I-~~i;r iU.Ili:i~. ~ ,T. 11 `Sr.~.L.rL} '.1?Tf;Frl r'yCtl }~~r~lCil~:/•' '.l~.ill':I-}^~tl~:.:il l.ill'~:12 11'.!ill'. ''~i ~ ~ / I ~ II'ryl'~f ~?Iy?~r_,, ~,.- jtl _i'`~LY ~l~a +~_~J~~1 ~~'_ tt L'-l iL ~ 1 ~ I I. r''j.~~r~ I~=1 a I'~?~tlL.I ~,:~ C:+;:?Iti~?=t211?.: L2i~tfi ~ttp_,'~i-~.'~'~;tl~tStl C!:!t12'I1~ir;;~Iit-= 1 ~ . Tt-1'2 rl'1:'ciI] iri'~'~?rfi? 1~ x. i ~' `t,flf?(7. TIi:? iil:'':i1;iI7 lrl~~':?If1'? lr. 'x;'a ;' t~3(~+~t jT1~,w ~?:'12~',l? tri15 13 a rn;~r~.~?t t.Yictt. rf1C?St. Y_?US121~~5:='S lrl ;vF_t11 '=~.~r~l_tl':~ 111~:~' t.C? rt?ct'v'1'1 n Tf r,r~ ~.:+=.irr'. f,+-,•;a .~inl 4z~iir. tr•:~.+-.• -.r, ~ t~~ ,~•.~} t j+-,~{, rr.~t1} ~,fr t ~:~ ~• ~:J 11 ,V{:` {: 3.11 1'.: •.: ~.1'; 111iiJ.li'•:iil Ll•. li:' 11 '.':li i_.Elf= T(_~ yi'11 4~.:' _:: ~: ~:lil~~ 211 ~'1.. C.' Vt'1i ~: '~:'L: %.11 =' }_t• i~~.t l'~_i, ?~.?a 5u 1+'•~??^ t t lYa , 1 YYC+}r F.a~~TC ?~?tj~ +rLU{.(';Yr~u tYr_irYY Cu `_174.1 ltY~~( C•'171"r~Yri`i,~l??,~i-,}n 'f'i 'v ~+'~: 13'.: 'i Y ~'. ~.~Ll '. ~~~"J.111~_lll~f 1'__ •',211 F_ 111'v 111`i.! •.1 _ _ 1~ JLLJ!•'1.llll il._ _ _. 111ii~L ~ _ 1 __ t}i:~.f: t;,,*111 t.~~ti~'fi f tfiH ~;,*~irj1H '; ;~.t1 r(.~t'lililit?i1t~*. - - - - i ~~ «_~1i'~~;~i ~flir'~ t=~~il~lf~ ~ ~;~*c_~it,~.:~ 11iC11:t~+r :a. tll.1~ ~:~=t.:~r ;i.ciTr2"t.1~,~1ilrllt 111 fitly r•1:~U.1"1i~1.1l1~1iL. ii. ' 4 T F?1 Ci;=~T-alit, c g- ;-1 1- ; , ,~T:rij3 (:iT „~>,~ ~, ~ ~ t- 1• ,,, .r ( t_ T.. 1".;,: TT T t 1 _a 1dZ1 y. li 1',1._4. _ .~• 1 tl .: ~• cl 111i11~YL ',1 :d1 ..'!,t ~~?ll J y.! ~ 1 s'lltlcll ~ ~ , 1'~1. '_111. ?l,•T r _, :.+:.-, ~ 3' i c `i,`L - +~. _ T r ? ?: t 1-:. i- f 7 .r ~:....-.-.: :.~: . 5 ~ ? Lt-~ 1 4''..I'l.'lt''~ ~:llt•_, ~j' 1 _!'J~J 11'.111.1 ldl 1'.!''(Yrl ':_!I ':' cljl l!.! li:'•1~y C1'.-•'Il clr' l!JUi ii' tll' tll• '.'..''~ lam' ,'till- n 111t:1U.._,._ _ ;~. '£:_'~~.._ _ ;.U.l._~' I.:1 C.12.: t:'1 ~:. • ::~~:~._il]., Z ..1 ~:i2r Fl'..,, t.,1,.2"12~1.iil~iit. 'till r~, •1 Yi` C+ ul y t Y1^uC• ffif}:'{ 1•=i ~L` Y i '~?"''t '-1ri~ i •=+tlr r''~i'F',_:Y Yr 14i-•:ui iY~G.`~ilC i'r'•,l1YYra Yr~utl 11 l.`lll ~l l•~: L~1 i?l lu'~ 1t++J'~_4s 1t: 1.`~vl ~ '~1~~1 ', Y~!~Ji11~J `J.l l'•.~ _•+:11'_.l 1113ti"y'v l~llll'v .~: ,mil ti` __ `_tl i:'v.'.111'v 11 `. P~y'1,i~11`'.F" F'~(~:~t.i~ 1t11;111f1G=` i~.J fl?i ~T(~~jlj- ~~-'lil!~]1'_t• ;'i j:ti?(:iY~~ _<_~1F''~:_~?~1~.'. I T,~4Tc~t%ltl ~~~~ .1~3T~~~:~'4T C<_~ ~~.ii~t'~~ri" .`t11~T ~i~ k~SC,it?Ii~~ ~Ftj1 t sill:=' llt. ll: ~,~*~ <;1~11C~r1-iliil'?' f.2il _' rjT~ilt. ~~.~:>iiL~,~l"~~tiiF~. FIB: asp (:~i1litct~~:t. 1:1'• cti:. ~ `'r~l- ;' _, j ~~ (.; 1. ~` ~~l-~_~~s.~ ;. TYi~trii~~ is>I''I~:;t_1T' i~~:~T1'iC~~2'Zt.1C:~li. . -, ~ / ~ ~~ - !_. _t. _;~:::, t.t:~i l,~iU.~:~ `~,ca 1% j.~%ii 111 is t. L;~l- AUG - 1 X89 July 31, 1989 T04JN OF VAIL 75 S. f=rontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Attn: Ron Phillips Dear Ron: 6Je're doing it!! Thanks to you and the Town of Vail, show time begins August 17th for "Anything Goes." On behalf of the Vail Community Theatre, I would like to extend our deep appreciation for your donation of $2,800 which helps to make our musical dream become a reality. Per the long-time requests of the community, we're preparing a fun, musical/comedy that will run for 7 days in August at Battle Mountain High School. We hope all of the To~vn employees will have the opportunity to see you in action with the rest of the Theatre! Again, we thank you for the generous donation. Most--sincerely, ~, ~~ ~~ C~ - ~~E1 i zal~eth Wi 1 t Secretar Y VAIL COMMUNITY THEATRE P.O. Box 2496/Vail, Colorado 81658 (303) 476-0100 AUG ° 3 July 29, 1989 Mr. William F. Nicholson, Jr. Chairman and President Colorado National Bank Shares, Inc. P.0. Box 5168 Denver, Colorado 80217 Dear Mr. Nicholson: Your July 2~lth letter is much appreciated. I agree that the water debate in Colorado should be on a high level. Unfortunately, in the absence of state water planning, Denver has had a longstanding lock on Colorado's water corrununity and doctrine. In fact, anyone w}ro c}~a].lenges Denver's 50 year Two Forks goal is in for the kind of personal abuse demonstrated in Mr. Tonsing's enclosed July 21st letter. On numerous occasions I have tried to alert Senator Armstrong and his staff to the widespread improper influence. used in the flawed Two Forks studies. There is no doubt Senator Exon has firsthand insider evidence of a major scandal, and he will use it if forced by his Colorado counterpart and friend. My frank and open letter to Senator Armstrong was designed to emphasize that viable alternatives were illegally ignored in the environmental studies. }Iopefully, this message will help reduce Colorado's embarrassment and readjustment time after EPA's veto is sustained. Senator Armstrong is leading a national effort to save an outmoded concept, and he is one of the few remaining politicians who is still willing to walk the plank for Two Forks. We have a 30 minute slide presentation on Two Forks Dam Alternatives, and I would be honored to give it to you and other business leaders, whenever convenient. T}le briefing will be treated as confidential, if desired. Thank you for your interest in this most important Colorado matter. Sinairely, Allen D. (Dave) Mil]_er ADTi/bm Encl: Letter from Mr. Tonsing dated July 21, 1989. ~11~~` i'If/fj. t ;V ~ ~ `COLORADO NATIONAL ~--~~, ~~~ BANKSHARES, INC. %~~a~,t~~,. WiII F. Nicholson, Jr Chairman of the Board and President July 24, 1989 Mr. Dave Miller P. O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO 80133 Dear Dave: You copied me with your letter dated July 17,1989 addressed to Senator William L. Armstrong. Over the months, if not years, I have been fascinated in reading your various proposals regarding water supplies in the State of Colorado. Although there may not be total agreement as to what you propose, you are performing a useful function in contributing to the debate regarding water in this state. Keep it up. I hasten to write because that usefulness, in my opinion, goes downhill very rapidly when you or other parties in the water policy debate start calling others of persuasions opposite to yours by less than complimentary names. My point in writing is to respectfully suggest that the State of Colorado is best served by keeping the discussion on a high level and not lowering it to the terms you did in the letter to Bill Armstrong. I for one take exception to your letter and wanted to tell you so. - Sin erely, ,~ / , / `~ ~~~ WFN/mps 950 Seventeent~ S±re~! Mailing Address: :.,aver. Cc~or-.,;;;. ~... _ ? - . ~~~ :- '3) 629 - is -.- _i6 vbr. ,, : , ~ .. ' Rober4 Tonsing Councilman, At-large Littleton City Council 2269 Ridge Road Littleton, Colorado 80120 July 21, 1989 Mr. Dave Miller Union Park Water Project P.O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, Colorado 80133 Dear Mr. Millere Your letter of July 17, 1989, addressed to Senator Bill Armstrong, came to my attention. As has been the case in all of the broadsides which preceded it, this one is awash in self-service and disinformation. Contrary to your assertions about Senator Armstrong, his statement about how EPA's irregular handling of Two Forks is a clear and present danger to much-needed water supply projects around the nation is not a "threatening rationale" but rather a forthright presentation of plain facts. Your postscript stating that "this letter has been coordinated with Senator Exon's office" really wasn't necessary. It has been clear for some time that the Senator is using Two Forks for personal demogoguery, and no doubt you two make a handsome philosophical couple. S'n ely, 0 v Robert L. Tonsing cca President Bush, Colorado Congressional delegation, Arapahoe County Commissioners July 22, 1989 Mr. Robert Tonsing Councilman, At-large Littleton City Council 2269 Ridge Road Littleton, CO. 80120 Dear Mr. Tonsing: The mind set expressed in your July 21,.1989 letter is a good example why Two Forks Dam has become one of Colorado's most embarrassing debacles. Our water development company has opposed Two Forks over the years, because several environmentally superior alternatives were purposely dropped from the studies to protect an obsolete concept. We have provided extensive technical data to support our basic claims that t11e off-river Union Park Reservoir alternative can increase Metro Denver's safe annual yield 40% more than Two Forks for about half the per acre-foot cost. Union Park's surplus Gunnison Basin water can also provide needed drought protection for Colorado's river environments on both slopes. To date, not a single one of our technical claims has been specifically refuted by any of the Two Forks proponents. In marked contrast, Arapahoe County wisely decided to purchase Union Park in 1988, after almost two years of detailed analysis by their highly qualified engineering and legal consultants. Your reference to "self--service" is ironic. As a highly paid non-technical advisor for Metro Denver water providers, you have already had more personal gain from your Two Forks involvement than most of the other key players. Although I greatly admire and am philosophically aligned with Senator Armstrong, Senator Exon is right, on this one. Instead of name calling, suggest you help lead Littleton and Metro Denver to a water development consensus based on a fair evaluation of all reasonable alternatives. S'ncerel.y, C~* ~~ Dave Miller ADM/bm cc: President Bush, U. S. Congressmembers, Colorado Legislators, EPA, Arapahoe Commissioners, Governor Romer. July 17, 1989 P.O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO. 80133 (719)481-2003 Senator William L. Armstrong Hart Building, 528 Washington, D. C. 20510 Dear Senator Armstrong: Your national drive to save Denver's controversial Two Forks Dam is not in step with the Bush Administration's valiant effort to balance environmental protection with economic development. Two Forks is being vetoed by EPA largely because the environmental studies were improperly influenced to protect an obsolete concept from a fair comparison with several environmentally advanced alternatives. These ongoing alternatives include Arapahoe County's high altitude, off-river, Union Park Reservoir from the untapped Gunnison Basin; and City of Thornton's innovative City-Farm Recycling project. Your recent nationwide statement: "If you can't build this Two Forks project, you can't build any project anywhere," is a threatening rationale that will surely backfire against any politician who uses it. Analysis will show Denver's record $40 million for Two Forks permitting was mostly for unprecedented duplicate studies, and legal maneuvering to influence agency heads into overriding the work of their career professionals. In fact, Senator Exon of Nebraska is gathering firsthand evidence showing wi.despr~ad intima.data.an of agency staffers thr4ughAUt the TwA Forks p®rmitting process. Instead of using the unfortunate Two Forks experience as a blanket threat against all good and bad water projects, respectfully suggest you push for enforcement of our national environmental laws that require detailed comparison of aYl viable alternatives. To do otherwise would be a serious breach of faith with future generations. Sincerely, Dave Miller ADM/bm P. S. This letter has been coordinated with Senator Exon's office. cc: President Bush, U.S. Congressmembers, EPA, CO. Legislators, Gov. Romer. ~i.ocky 1V~ountainNews "Give light and the people will find their own way" ,~~itori~ls I,etter~ wcdnegday, July l s, - 9ss Armstrong ail wet on Forks threat Editor: Sen. Bill Armstrong's national drive to save Denver's controversial Two Forks Dam is not In step with the Bush administration's valiant effort to balance environmental protection with economic development. Two Forks is being vetoed by EPA large= ly because the environmental studies were improperly in[luenced to protest an obso- lete concept; from a fair comparison wltlt several envlronmenlally advanced alterna= fives. These ongoing alternatives includ@ Arapahoe County's high-altitude, off-river Union Park Reservoir from the untapped Gunnison Basin; and the city of Thornton'9 innovative city-farm, recycling project. Armstrong's recent nationwide state ment: "I[.you can't build this Two Forks project, you can't build any project any- where," is a rationale that will surely back fire on any politician who uses it. Analysis will show Denver's record a40 million for Two Forks permitting was mostly [or unprecedented duplicate studies and legal maneuvering.to influence agency heads into overriding the work of their career professionals. In fact, Sen. James Exon of Nebraska is gathering firsthand evidence showing widespread intimidation of agency staffers throughout the Two Forks permitting process. Instead of using the unfortunate Two Forks experience as a blanket threat against all good and bad water projects, Armstrong should push for enforcement of our national environment laws that require detailed comparison of all viable alterna- tives. To do otherwise wonid be a serious breach of faith with future generations. DAVE MILLER Palmer Lake July 29, 1989 Mr. He.rr.ick Roth Colorado Forum 1512 Larimer, Suite ~F30 Denver, Colorado 80202-1619 Dear FIerrick: Many thanks for the sage advice in your July 28t1i letter. I am trying to be constructive and gentle, while also being effective. As you can imagine, it is not easy to reverse 50 years of misguided momentum -- especially when political pressure means more than engineering and environmental Facts. As we have discussed, tha Two Forlcs decision is critical for Colorado, because it is the necessary lead project for Several other Denver plans to further dewater the same tipper Colorado headwaters. The decision time for the next 50 years is now. Senator Exon and many insiders are convinced that federal laws were violated and alternatives ignored, because of unfair political pressure. Colorado does not have the time to be overly circumspect with those who are not willing to test their project against the viable alternatives. ' Analysis of alternatives is the heart of our national environmental laws, and this will surely be the prime basis for EPA's veto. Our stockholders may eventually benefit, but Colorado will be the big winner when the rules of the game are followed. Sincerely,' ~~~ Dave Miller ADl`f/bm TOUR ~ ~~ ®N P ~ ~ ~ TOUR While in Gunnison, Colorado Water Workshop experts should take a self-guided tour oi° Arapahoe County's off-river Union Park Reservoir and dam site. The senic, 22 hour round trip from Gunnison will show where tzp to 1.1 million acre-feet will be efficiently stored in a natural high altitude, sage covered bowl, during wet years for release by gravity siphon and conduit to both slopes during droughts. 7'he Forest Service road from the Willow Creek turn-off to the dam site is easily traveled by passenger auto, unless there have bE~en heavy rains. The much improved Cottonwood Pass road is also a beautiful route for return to the East Slope. For additional information on Union Park, contact Dave Miller at the Water Workshop, or at Tomi~hi Village Inn. 641-1131. a Rocky Port `~ Fiesarvolr `~ E I . 1 15 5 5' `~. Pvmplnfl/G®nsratlon Plaint, l,v~xw ` Taylor Park Dam ~~~ /~ ~. ~d o ~~ ~~ ~~ i f I i r rn ~ ~ ~ ,~ , W N .-1 h tog s e~% ~' Toy /or Pork Reservoir EI. ®330' Creek Ts d v pv.~ I/'rT.+ l r~ v,A co~r~woed P.~s as K;. - - - - _ ~~allow ~ ~ ~ J - ~. crime QPa~mpin~/Qaneratio`n , ~ ~° ~ Plant bo ~.w TNC~p ~ • s ~ i ~ i Tunnel to - - - - -~. East 81®p® 4d"c GFS ~ s;P•c e ~, Td P/~~r~ y 1 1 Union P, ork Resevoir. E1.10,052' \ ~~ K Union ParOc ®am ® 1 ~I~il ®u~tai~ l~edIlC~l, ~.~. 181 West 1~11eadow Drive, Suite 200 Mail, Colorado 81657-5059 (303) 476-5695 July 25, 1989 Allen D. Miller President Natural Energy Resources Company P.O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO 80133 Dear Mr. Miller: FAMILY PRACTICE Jonathan Feeney, M.D. Phil Freedman, M.D. Kent Petrie, M.D. Thomas i. Steinberg, M.D. Steven A. Yarberry, M.D. IlVTERNAL MEDICINE Mark R. Stephens, M.D. OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY INFERTILrIY Edward L. Cohen, M.D. PEDIATRICS -` Lawrence 1. Essember, M.D. ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL ASSIS7TNG/ORTHOTICS Lee Strakbein, O.P.A., C.O. As a member of the Vail Town Council, I get your correspondence concerning water issues and particularly the illogical Two Forks Damn project. I would like to thank you for the information that is~so laid out for the rest of us that are not involved in the water issues on a daily basis. I encourage you to continue the fight and if myself or`, conceivably, the Vail Town Council can help you in any of these matters, certainly feel free to call on us. Sincerely, r~ ~ ~ homas I, Steinberg, M.D. TIS/rkk r ~,;:: ti. i*;j' r - ,~`i. JO~I~1 VnNL~~=I?~%~LK~I~ Ptr. Dave Miller P.O. Box 567 Palmer Lake, CO 80133 July 21, 1989 Dear Mr. Puller, ~~ f? i - Box i i i ~anne~rog, ~~e6ras~la b8831 Thank you fur continuing to keep me on your mai19_ng list for. Two Forks correspondence. I find the informati.un you send me very helpful. Thank you also for continuing to speak out'on the alternatives to Two Forks. You are one of the few people who know the technical details and ar.e willing to counter the pro- paganda of the Denver Water Board and their stable of pulitici.ana and PR firms. You are playing an important role. Sincerely, /? i John G. VanDerwalker JGV:drn John F. Malo #7 Polo Field Lane Denver, Colorado 80209 July 5, 1989 Town Council Vail, Colorado To whom it may concern, I reside in B-1, All Seasons Club, looking directly out at Golden Peak. I am filing this complaint because of the new home being constructed in Mill Creek Court. It is preposterous, an eye sore and completely out of order considering the existing architecture. You have a good thing going at Vail Colorado, in most cases, why foul it all up with some guy who doesn't seem to care what other people think? Sincerely, D .John F. Malo AUG e 4 ~ To the Editor, Did you know that in 1986 an estimated 23,000 U.S. nonsmokers died from lung cancer and that the Surgeon General attributes a substantial number of those deaths to passive smoking; and that several studies have linked involuntary smoking with heart disease? Did you realize that Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) is the major contributor to indoor pollution and out of all the variables that we have control of, cigarette smoke is one of them? Did you know that in a recent Town of Vail survey that 85% of the respondents said that they were nonsmokers and that over two thirds of the nation are nonsmokers? So why is that when we know all of these facts, the Upper Vail Valley continues to function without a Clean Indoor Air Act? 'There are 26 cities in Colorado that restrict smoking in the workplace and Vail and Avon are not among them. We pride ourselves on being able to live in a beautiful environment and to enjoy the outdoors, but unfortunately we can't breathe the air indoors. It is important to give credit to the Town of Vail for instituting a no-smoking ordinance for all the Town buildings and vehicles. Isn't it time that we as a community take the initiative further? Reggie O'Brien Fresh Air Committee cc: _Kent Rose John Slevin Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Michael Cacioppo Thomas Steinberg This is a copy of a letter sent to The Vail Trail, Vail Daily and ABC Times. ~I ~ Q Exhibit D ~f~! --°`-~ U?~ G~ ~~ C~ fig) ABATE CARd~ Effective 1/1/89 Service £fi Installation for all areas except Beaver Creek ~®I-D S'i't-1R SER~1~CE -Your best entertainment value $37.95 Enjoy 23 channels of BASIC programming plus any TWO of the five premium services and receive up to $6.90 a month discount off our single service prices. GOLD STAR Plus 1 (Basic and any 3 premium services) .....47.95 GOLD STAR Plus 2 (Basic and any 4 premium servies) ... .. 57.95 GOLD STAR Plus 3 (Basic and all 5 premium services) ...... 67.95 BASIC SERVICE -see channel chart for details ............... 20.95 Note: a converter & converter deposit may be required if your T.V. or V.C.R. are not cable ready. SgIV~ILE SER~I~CE PRICES: H.B.O., Cinemax, Showtime or The Movie Channel are $11.95* each. The Disney Channel, a family favorite, in only $9.95* VdIRELESS REMOTE CONTROL ONLY' $3.95 ADDITIONAL OUTLETS: $3.50 each. You .can enjoy the same premiums on your additional outlets for only $6.45 a month per outlet.* INSTALLATION FEES 6z DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS STANDARD INSTALLATION $30.00. Additional outlets are $5.00 each if prewired and activated during the same service call. NON-STANDARD INSTALLATION $50.00 (1st service or new drop needed.) ADDITIONAL OUTLETS, if prewired $30.00. If not prewired $50.00 and written authorization must be received in our office before we will drill through or run external wiring in most structures. Name change fee for an address with active service ............ $10.00 Service Upgrade or change, in office .... .9.95 Reconnect after aNon-Pay Disconnect . . .............. .40.00 First Service Install in Lake Creek only ...................... 150.00 *Premium Services require the use of a converter. A VISA or Master Card slip signed, but not turned in by us, in the amount of $200.00 or a $50.00 cash deposit is required per converter. A SERVICE DEPOSIT equal to your monthly rate is also required. It's refundable or may be used to pay for your last month's service. ~~°~~~~'~ ~~~S,1S1®~1 949-5530 0140 Metcalf I2J. Avon, ColuraJo 131620 a;a RECD J U L 3 1 X89 ~T~T~ OF COLOR~O COLORADO DEPARTAAENT OF 1-IEALTFI • • , of cod , 4210 East 11Eh Avenue -,e~;~~9~' Denver, Colorado 80220 ~'~^ $ ~ Phone (303) 320-8333 ~~v~>t X876 °' Roy Romer Governor TO: Interested Parties FROM: Dick Parachini~l 1~ Eagle Mine On-Site Coordinator DATE: July 25, 1989 Thomas. M. Vernon,_M.D. _ Executive Director SUBJEL°r: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -- June 1989 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring proram during the 1989 construction season. The airborne particulate data shown in the accompanying table are preliminary in nature. This means that the values, particularly the metal levels, may be revised after auditing and validation by the contractor and the State. The information is useful in assessing emissions and subsequent dust control during construction, as well as trends in potential human exposure< The Colorado Department of Health did not receive any analytical results reports that indicate the occurrence of 24-hour average air concentrations of arsenic or cadmium in excess of the air monitoring program trigger values. The less than (<) or less than/equal to (<_) notations mean that the laboratory instrument detection limit for the particular sample analysis was measuring right at the quoted metal concentration. The trigger value for both arsenic and cadmium is 0.01 ug/m3. This trigger value is set at a level slightly above the instrument detection limit that provides an accurate, quantifiable measurement of arsenic and cadmium. The permit levels for TSP (Total Suspended Particulates) and Pb (lead) were not exceeded during this same time period (June 1989). The values observed for TSP, lead, arsenic, and cadmium during June 1989 did not exceed applicable site permit standards or trigger levels. The measured values for June 3, 1989 at the North Cross Greek air monitoring site were included in the May 1989 air data evaluation, and are not included in the June 1989 results. Evaluation of the June 1989 air monitoring data indicates that the average airborne concentrations of arsenic and cadmium reported at or below the reporting tri~~er level (0.01 ug/m3) are adequately protective. •r Memo to Interested Parties Page 2 July 25, 1989 The State installed additional air monitoring stations on July 14, 1989 around the site in response to public concerns related to fugitive dust emissions. Three TSP monitors have been placed-on top of the Minturn Middle School roof ___to_provide_every.. da.,y._coverage..____One_TSP_. monitor_has._.been__placed_in..the_Middle___ __ School foyer; another is on top of the Minturn Community Center. These two monitors will operate on the same 1-in-3 day schedule as the other site monitoring stations. The air quality data from these additional monitors will be provided to all interested parties in the future. For further information, please contact Dick Parachini at 827-5928 or Mike McHugh at 331-4845. /cf P PROVISIONAL AIR QUALITY DATA lug/m3) EAGLE PANE SITE June 1989 SCHOOL SITE NORTH/CROSS CREEK SITE Total° Total° Suspended Suspended P llc l t ar u a e Particulate Da4e (TSP) leadtl° Arsenic Cadmium PH10 (TSP) lead°p Arsenic Cadmium PId10 Sampled ug/m3_ u9/i°3_ ug/m3_ ~cl/m3_ u /m3 ug/m3_ ug/m3_ ug/m3_ uq/m3- ug/m3- 06/03/89 23.6 0,007 0.005 < 0.006 9.0 94.2 0.487 0,245 < 0,011 48,3 06/06/89 30.9 0,010 < 0.002 <=0.009 12.6 33.6 0.007 <=0,002 < 0.007 14.4 06/09/89 18.1 < 0,004 <=0.002 < O.OOB 12.8 19.6 0.009 <=0.002 < 0,008 14.8 06/12/89 16.6 < 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.008 9.5 19.7 0.006 < 0.002 < 0.007 12.8 06/15/89 23.0 < 0.004 0.003 < 0,008 14.5 26.7 0.004 <=0.002 < 0,008 20.2 06/18/89 ~, $ ---- ---- ---- ..11.3 21.6 < 0,003 < 0,002 < 0.007 16.4 06/21/89 37.8 < 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.008 12.4 46,0 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.007 17.3 06/24/89 36.6 0.007 < 0.002 < 0.008 17.4 39.8 0.009 < p,002 < 0,008 22.5 06/27/89 29.1 0.010 0.003 < 0.009 15.5 29.4 0.004 0.003 < 0.008 19,1 06/30/89 31,? i 0,015 0.003 < 0.010 11.6 31.1 0,007 0.003 < 0.008 17.9 ° =Permit I limitation 150 ug/m3 °O Permit limlttion 1.5 ug/m3 $ a Invalid data , THESE DATA ARE PROVISIONAL AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER AUDITING AND VALIDATION. ~, I, y n °"L l,~rl i I' ~1,,.,~ ~2 z hvlz Irz I `.IZ L ~4~ Ir: I ~a; 4E 5( 51 s' 5' L 5: sE ~~ TOWN OF VAIL , REtaL_ESTA~LE-.~SlaC.tSEE.R-.SAY _ HISTORY FROM 1980 TO 1989 +?~0 1-9E31 -1982- :: '98.3 .1..584- ~ 485 --1-5-86 1-982- ~ s ,ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL` ACT{JAL ACTUAL ACTUAL .ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL .JANUARY FEBRUARY 563, 999 540, 595 598.-085 569, 018 S 1 Ob, 981-- 5105, 024 -•-~-1 1-St-:~2 5132, 220 '~-z8,-0S3•- 586, 289 ---~8~t,--7.33 5170, 052 ~ i 9.1-.-374 564, 906 'k-1-3-i-. 9-16- 544. GRG -?96.--1-19 ~ 5105, 873 MARCH 569, 886 512b, 935 5109, 533 5137, 820 562, 693 563, 831 592, 557 538, 791 508, 104 AE'.R.IL 5.7-6.55 '5.4._653 .565 9.04 '~-103.-Sab 51-7-3,-321 590.-356 '~y8e.-~43 '~95.-554 x.1.7-9..b_Zl j MAY 542, 738 584, 324 554, 663 590, 599 596, 006 5228, 673 598, 651 5120, 984 599, 736 ~ JUNE 562, 239 5125, 433 554, 488 5140, 638 576, 467 549, 513 579, 915 573, 509 5101, 364 - -.JULY-_ 5.4.5.-367 5.186.-1-10 5i-04.-262 56E1,-539 5-1-5.598-- ~Er88,--5t8 -574,-441- 547-.-944-..-_ ._u_51-26,-537 AUGUST 579, 859 5115, 499 571, 282 597, 80b 558, 937 532, Bb0 5100, 182 561, 137 5109, 315 SEPTEMDER 559, 800 5113, 992 549, 332 596, 746 564, 671 548, 516 5108, 167 578, 819 5116, 557 -.OCTOBER- ~~ '~1-085.1.0 X1.54,_000.- -_542._4-98- -.-5.1.22.-546 -588.--732- -X109,-633- _-._b93.-960- ---~1a4,-29.1--- -51-7-7-.-360- NOVEMBER 5102, 623 5107, 768 581, 698 591, 385 5105, 109 574, 909 589, 047 5114, 834 5241, 888 DECEMBER - _ 5142, b62 5133, 667 #110, 911 556, 533 581, 890 .5333. 139 '6106, 695 595, 495 5192, 947 I TOTAL i 5899, 133 51, 409, 688 5956, 572 51, 258, 330 _ 51, 129, 766 51, 370, 783 51, 188, 538 ___ __ ___ 51, 027, 324 51, 619, 471 'i 1484 -_- ,i ACTUAL RESALE TIMESHARE OTHER TOTAL ' JANUARY ' 5309, 233 5246, 256 b8. 077 554, 900 5309, 233 FEBRUARY ' 5140, 192 5136, 782 52, 829 5581 5140, 192 ARCH 51145 957 ~1~4-1-.-426 54,-~42-4 51Od $1.45.-957 APRIL " 5151,-070 5147, 656 53, 400 514 5151, 070 MAY 5220, 299 5216, 003 53, 520 5776 5220, 299 IJNEa '~-1-32.4f66 5-129+-~94(]- 5~ .-2C~2 ---5264- --$1-22,-466---. JULY 5125, 675 5121, 125 52, 513 52, 037 5125, 675 AUGUST E2IEC'1BER OCTOBER { NOVEMBER rECEMBER -- --- - -- ~, _.~-- ---- TOTAL 51, 214, 892 51, 130, 188 526, 030 558, 674 51, 214, 892 - - li ' 1 iE p. I ~ ORDINANCE NOa 20 Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO FOR THE BOOTH CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT) RATIFYING ACTION HERETOFORE TAKEN IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; PRESCRIBING DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID BONDS AND DISTRICT; PRESCRIBING DUTIES OF CERTAIN TOWN OFFICIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND OTHER ACTION OF THE TOWN TO THE EXTENT INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETOe WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the "Town"), in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado, is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing as a home-rule town under Article XX of the State Constitution and the Charter of the Town (the Charter"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter and the Town's Code of Ordinances (the '°Vail Code"), the Town Council (the "Council") has by ordinance created within the corporate limits of the Town a local improvement district known and designated as the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District (the "District"), for the purpose of making certain local and special improvements to mitigate rockfall damage (the "Improvements"), and has determined to assess a portion of the cost thereof to the parcels of property in the District specially benefited thereby; and WHEREAS, the Town has duly advertised for bids for such Improvements based on estimates provided to the Council and has entered into a construction contract for the construction and installation of the Improvements; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the general benefits conferred by the Improvements, the Council has determined to contribute $20,000 from funds of the Town to the total estimated -1- o cost of constructing and installing the Improvements, has determined to assess the remaining costs against parcels of property in the District (the reassessments") in an aggregate amount not to exceed $366,756 (except as otherwise permitted by the Charter and the Vail Code) in recognition of special benefits conferred on owners of parcels of property in the District, and has determined that local improvement bonds of the Town shall be issued payable from such assessments. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. Issuance of Bonds Authorized. The Town and its officers have determined and do hereby determine that it is necessary and for the best interest of the Town and the inhabitants thereof that, pursuant to the Charter and the Vail Code, the Town issue and sell bonds of the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District in the aggregate principal amount of $365;000 (the "bonds") at a price of $ 365,000 plus accrued interest, for the purpose of paying the costs of constructing and otherwise acquiring the Improvements and all proper incidental expenses (including, without limitation, capitalized interest on the bonds). Section 2. Sale of Bonds. The Town has determined to accept the offer of FirstBank of Vail to purchase all of the bonds for a price of $ 365,000 plus accrued interest. Section 3. Approval of Estimates. The bonds are herein authorized to be, and they shall be, issued based upon the contract price for the Improvements and upon estimates of the Town Manager, all of which hereby are approved by the Council. Section 4. Com letion of Im rovements. The Town covenants that the Improvements will be constructed and completed with due diligence and in a timely manner. Section 5. Bond Details. For the purpose of paying the costs of the improvements, including all proper incidental expenses, there shall be issued in the name of the Town bonds designated '°Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement °2~ District, Local Improvement Bonds, Series 1989,'° in the aggregate principal amount of $365,000. The bonds shall be- issuable in fully registered form (i.e., registered as to payment of both principal and interest) payable to the registered owner thereof, in the denomination of $5,000 each, shall be dated as of August 15, 1989, shall be numbered consecutively in regular numerical order from 1 through 73, inclusive, shall mature on April 1, 1999, and shall bear interest from the date of the bonds until maturity (unless redeemed prior to maturity) at the interest rates herein set forth. The following numbered bonds in the aggregate principal amounts indicated shall bear interest at the following rates per annum: Bonds Numbered Aggregate Principal Interest Inclusive) Amount Rates 1 to 7 $35,000 9.50 8 t6 12 25,000 9.50 13 to 17 25,000 9.5$ 18 to 23 30,000 9.5°s 24 to 30 35,000 9.50 31 to 37 35,000 9.50 38 to 45 40,000 9.50 46 to 54 45,000 9.5a 55 to 63 45,000 9.50 64 to 73 50,000 g,5g Bonds which are reissued upon transfer or other replacement shall bear interest- from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of the bonds, such interest being payable to the registered owners of the bonds on April 1, 1990, and semiannually thereafter on April l and October 1 of each year. The principal of the bonds is.payable-to the registered owner thereof as shown on the registration books of the Town kept by Central Bank Denve~n Denver Colorado, or its successor (the '°registrar'°), upon presentation and surrender at the office of Central Bank ~Denvpr in Denver o3e Colorado, or its successor (the "paying agent'). If, upon presentation of any bond at maturity, payment is not made as therein provided, interest thereon shall continue at the same rate per annum previously borne by the bond, until the principal thereof is paid in full. Payment of interest on any bond shall be made to the registered owner thereof by check or draft mailed by the paying agent on or before each interest payment date (or, if such interest payment date is not a business day, on or before the next succeeding business day), to the registered owner thereof at his address as shown on the registration books kept by the registrar at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month preceding the interest payment date; but any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the registered owner thereof at the close of business on such day and shall be payable to the person who is the registered owner thereof at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of any such defaulted interest. Such special record date shall be fixed by the registrar whenever moneys become available for payment of the defaulted interest, and notice of the special record date shall be given to the registered owners of the bonds not less than ten days prior thereto by first-class mail to each such registered owner as shown on the registration books on a date selected by the registrar, stating the date of the special record date and the date fixed for 'the payment of such defaulted interest. The paying agent may make payments of interest by such alternative means as may be mutually agreed to between the owner of any bond and the paying agent. All such payments shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America without deduction for the services of the paying agent or registrar. - Section 6. Prior Redemption. All of the bonds shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the Town in regular numerical order on any bond interest payment date, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus °4- accrued interest to the redemption dates Whenever there are available moneys (other than amounts deposited therein as accrued and capitalized interest) in the '°Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, 1989 Bond Retirement Fund'° (the '°Bond Fundro) which is hereby created, in excess of the amount required to pay interest on the bonds then outstanding on the next interest payment date, the Town shall exercise its option to redeem on the next practicable interest payment date a suitable number of bonds outstandingo Nothing herein shall preclude the Town from refunding all or a portion of the bonds or from exercising its right to redeem bonds prior to maturity from any available source of fundso Notice of prior redemption shall be given by the paying agent in the name of the Town by sending a copy thereof by certified or registered first class mail, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of each bond designated for redemption at his address as it appears on the registration books as of the close of business on the day preceding the mailing of such notices Such notice shall specify the number or numbers of the bonds to be so redeemed and the date fixed for redemption, and shall further state that on such date there will be due and payable upon each bond so to be redeemed at the office of the paying agent the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date, and that from and after such date interest shall cease to accrues Notice having been given in the manner hereinabove provided, the bond or bonds so called shall become due and payable on the date so designated, and upon presentation thereof at the paying agent, the Town will pay the bond or bonds so callede Failure to give notice by mailing or any defect in such notice shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any other bondse Any notice mailed as herein provided shall be conclusively presumed to have been given, whether or not receivede~ Any bonds redeemed prior to maturity shall be cancelled by the Paying Agento _.... -5- Section 7o Registration and Transfero The Town shall cause to be kept at the principal office of the registrar books for the registration and transfer of bondse Upon surrender for transfer of any bond at the principal office of the registrar, fully endorsed for transfer or accompanied by an assignment duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney duly authorized in writing, the registrar shall authenticate and deliver in the name of the transferee a new bond bearing the same number as the bond being surrendereda All bonds issued upon any transfer shall be the valid obligations of the Town evidencing the same obligation, and entitled to the same security and benefits under this ordinance as the bonds surrendered upon such transfero The registrar shall require the payment by the owner of any bond requesting transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, and the registrar may further impose a reasonable service charge for any transfer of bondse The registrar shall not be required to transfer any bond during a period beginning at the opening of business 15 days before the day of mailing by the registrar of a notice of prior redemption of bonds and ending at the close of business on the day of such mailing, nor, with respect to a particular bond after the publication or the mailing of notice calling such bond for prior redemptions As to any bond, whether or not such bond be overdue, the person in whose name the same shall be registered shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for the purpose of making payments thereof and for all other purposes (except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 5 hereof) and neither the Town, the registrar, the paying agent nor any other agent of the Town shall be affected by any notice to the contraryo Except as otherwise provided in Section 5 hereof, payment of either principal or interest on any bond shall be made only to or upon the written order of the registered owner thereof or his legal representative, but such registration may be changed as -6- hereinabove provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such bond to the extent of the sum or sums paid. If any bond shall be lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated, the registrar shall, upon receipt of such evidence, information or indemnity relating thereto as it or the Town may reasonably require, and upon payment of all expenses in connection therewith, authenticate and deliver a replacement bond bearing the same number as the lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated bond. If such lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated bond shall have matured or shall have been called for redemption, the registrar may direct that such bond be paid by the paying agent in lieu of replacement. All bonds surrendered for redemption, payment or transfer, if surrendered to the paying agent, shall be cancelled by the paying agent, and, if surrendered to any person other than the paying agent, shall be delivered to the paying agent for cancellation. Section 8. Negotiability. Subject to the registration provisions of this ordinance, the bonds shall be fully negotiable and shall have all the qualities of negotiable paper, subject to the registration and payment provisions stated herein, and the owner or owners thereof shall possess all rights enjoyed by holders of negotiable instruments under the provisions of the "Uniform Commercial Code _ Investment Securities.n Section 9. Execution and Authentication. The bonds shall be executed in the name of the Town with the facsimile signature of the Mayor, shall bear the facsimile seal of the Town,. shall be attested by the facsimile signature of the Town Clerk, and shall be authenticated by the manual signature of a duly authorized officer of the registrar. The bonds bearing--the signatures of the officers in office at the time of the authorization thereof shall be the valid and binding obligations of the Town (subject to the requirement of authentication by the registrar), notwithstanding that any or all of the persons whose -7- signatures appear thereon shall have ceased to fill their respective offices. Pursuant to the Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act, part 1 of article 55 of title 11, Colorado Revised Statutes, the Mayor and Town Clerk shall prior to delivery of the bonds file with the Secretary of State of Colorado their manual signatures certified by them under oath. No bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose unless the certificate of authentication, substantially in the form hereinbelow provided, has been duly executed by the registrar. The registrar's certificate of authentication shall be deemed to have been executed by it if manually signed by an authorized officer or employee of the registrar, but it shall not be necessary that the same officer or employee sign the certificate of authentication on all of the bonds issued hereunder. By authenticating any of the bonds delivered pursuant to this ordinance, the registrar shall be deemed to have assented to all of the provisions of this ordinance. Section 10. Payment of Bonds. The bonds authorized by this ordinance and the interest thereon shall be payable (except as provided in Section 11 hereof) solely from moneys in the Bond Fund, consisting only of moneys collected (principal, interest and penalties, if any) from the assessments to be levied to pay for the Improvements (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 11 hereof); provided that any proceeds from the sale of the bonds, other than such proceeds deposited in the Bond Fund to be used to pay interest on the bonds, remaining after the payment of all the costs and expenses of making the Improvements shall be deposited in the Bond Fund and used for bond redemption. Any assessments in the Bond Fund remaining after the bonds, both principal and interest, are paid in full (and after any reimbursement due the Town), shall to the extent required by the Charter be deposited in the Town's surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter. Immediately upon the collection of any assessments (including interest and any penalties thereon), -8~ the moneys therefrom shall be deposited in the Bond Fund (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 11 hereof), and said fund is and will continue to be irrevocably and exclusively pledged for the payment of the principal of and the interest on the bonds. Section 11. Surplus and Deficiency Fund; Town Payment of Bonds and Reimbursement. Pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter, whenever there is a deficiency in the Bond Fund to make the payment of principal and interest on the outstanding bonds when due, such deficiency shall be paid out of the Town's surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter. Further, whenever three-fourths of the bonds have been paid and cancelled and for any reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the remaining bonds and the interest due thereon, and there is not sufficient money in the Town's surplus and deficiency fund, then the Town shall pay the bonds when due and interest thereon, and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. Section 12. Bonds Not a Debt of Town. The bonds shall not be a debt of the Town, and the Town shall not be liable thereon, nor shall it thereby pledge its full faith and credit for their payment, nor shall the bonds be payable out of any funds other than the special assessments and other moneys pledged to the payment thereof, as herein provided. The payment of bonds is not secured by an encumbrance, mortgage or other pledge of property of the Town except for such special assessments. No property of the Town, subject to said exception, shall be liable to be forfeited or taken in payment of the bonds. Section 13. Form of Bonds. The bonds and the registrar's certificate of authentication shall be in substantially the following forms, with such omissions, insertions, endorsements and variations as to any recitals of fact or other provisions as may be required by the circumstances, be required or permitted by this ordinance or be consistent with this ordinance and necessary or appropriate to conform to the -9- rules and requirements of any governmental authority or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto, and provided that any of the text on the face of the bonds may, with appropriate reference, be printed on the back of the bonds: -10- (Form of Bond) STATE OF COLORADO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COUNTY OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO BOOTH CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 1989 NO< Interest Rate Maturity Date April 1, 1999 CUSIP Dated as of Number 9.5 REGISTERED OWNERe PRINCIPAL AMOUNT% $5,000 The Town of Vail (the '°Town") in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner identified above, or registered assigns, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of C'.Pntral Bank D ny~er1ri Denver , Colorado (the "Paying Agent"), the Principal Amount identified above on the Maturity Date identified above (subject to the right of prior redemption hereinbelow mentioned), and to pay interest on the Principal Amount from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of this Bond, at the Interest Rate per annum identified above, payable on April 1, 1990 and semi- annually thereafter on April 1 and October 1 of each year, until payment of the Principal Amount hereof has been made. Interest on this Bond will be paid on or before each interest payment date (or, if such interest payment date is not a business day, on or before the next succeeding business day) to the registered owner of this Bond by check or draft mailed to such registered owner at August 15, 1989 -11- the address appearing on the registration books kept for that purpose at the office of Central Bank Denyerin Denver , Colorado, as Registrar, at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month preceding the interest payment date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the registered owner hereof at the close of business on the Regular Record Date and shall be payable to the person who is the registered owner hereof at the close of business on a Special Record Date for the payment of any defaulted interest. Such Special Record Date shall be fixed by the Registrar whenever moneys become available for payment of the defaulted interest, and notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to the registered owners of the Bonds of the series of which this is one not less than ten days prior thereto. Alternative means of payment of interest may be used if mutually agreed to between the owner of any Bond and the Paying Agent, as provided in the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Bonds (the '°Bond Ordinancero). The principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America, without deduction for the services of the Paying Agent or Registrar. If upon presentation and surrender of this Bond to the Paying Agent at maturity payment of this Bond is not made as herein provided, interest hereon shall continue at the Interest Rate identified above until the Principal Amount hereof is paid in full. This Bond is one of a series subject to prior redemption in regular numerical order by and at the option of the Town of Vail, on any interest payment date, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof with accrued interest to the redemption date. Whenever there are available moneys (other than amounts deposited therein as accrued and capitalized interest) in the Bond Fund in excess of the amount required to pay interest on the bonds then outstanding on the next interest payment date, the °12° Town will exercise its option to redeem on the next practicable interest payment date a suitable number of bonds outstanding. Nothing shall preclude the Town from refunding all or a portion of the bonds or from exercising its right to redeem bonds prior to maturity from any available source of funds. Redemption shall be made upon giving prior notice by mailing to the owner of this Bond at his address as the same appears upon the registration books, in the manner and upon the conditions provided in the Bond Ordinance. The Registrar will not be required to transfer any Bond during a period beginning at the opening of business 15 days before the day of the mailing by the Registrar of a notice of prior redemption of Bonds and ending at the close of business on the day of such mailing, or, with respect to a particular Bond, after the mailing of notice calling such Bond for prior redemption. This Bond is one of a series of local improvement Bonds numbered consecutively from 1 to 73, both inclusive, issued by the Town of Vail, and maturing on April 1, 1999, all of which are of like designation, and which are in the aggregate principal amount of $365,000. Said Bond series is issued in payment for local improvements made in the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District pursuant to and in accordance with the Charter and the Vail Code, the ordinance creating the District, and all laws and proceedings thereunto enabling. Pursuant to the Bond Ordinance, reference to which is made for further details, the principal of and the interest on the Bonds of the series of which this is one shall be payable solely from a special fund designated "Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, 1989 Bond Retirement Fund'° (the "Bond Fund") consisting of moneys collected by the Town of Vail from the special assessments (principal, interest and penalties, if any) to be levied against all the assessable parcels of land in the District, to the extent provided in the Bond Ordinance; provided that any proceeds from the sale of the -13- Bonds, other than such proceeds deposited in the Bond Fund to be used to pay interest on the Bonds, remaining after the payment of all the costs and expenses of making the local improvements shall be deposited in the Bond Fund and shall be used for bond redemption. The Bond Fund is irrevocably and exclusively pledged for the full and prompt payment of all the Bonds. If there is a deficiency in the Bond Fund to meet the payment of the outstanding Bonds and interest due thereon, the deficiency shall be paid out of any moneys available therefor in the surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Town's Charter. Whenever three-fourths of the Bonds have been paid and cancelled and for any reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the remaining Bonds and interest due thereon, and there is not sufficient money in the surplus and deficiency fund, then the Town shall pay the Bonds when due and the interest thereon and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. All assessments shall be a lien in the several amounts assessed from the effective date of the assessment ordinance to be adopted by the Town-upon completion of the local improvements in the District. The lien for such assessments shall be prior and superior to all other liens except general tax liens, other assessment liens, and possibly other liens imposed by the State of Colorado or its political subdivisions or by the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof. In the Bond Ordinance, the Town covenants to levy and collect assessments against all assessable parcels of property in the District and to diligently enforce the lien of the assessments against the property subject thereto. It is hereby certified, recited and declared that the principal amount of the Bonds does not exceed the amount authorized by law to be issued. It is hereby also certified, recited and declared that the proceedings taken to date with reference to issuing the Bonds and to making such local improvements have been regularly had and taken in compliance with -14- law; that all prerequisites to issuing the Bonds have been performed; and that all acts, conditions and things essential to the validity of this Bond exist, have happened and have been done in due time, form and manner as required by law. The Bonds are not a debt of the Town and the Town is neither liable thereon, nor has it pledged its full faith and credit for their payment, nor are the Bonds payable out of any funds other than special assessments and other amounts pledged to the payment thereof as herein stated. The payment of the Bonds is not secured by an encumbrance, mortgage or other pledge of property of the Town except for such special assessments pledged for the payment of the Bonds. No property of the Town, subject to said exception, shall be liable to be forfeited or taken in payment of the Bonds. The Town has designated the Bonds of the series of which this is one as a qualified tax-exempt obligation pursuant to Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This Bond is fully transferable by the registered owner hereof in person or by his duly authorized attorney on the registration books of the Town kept at the office of the Registrar upon surrender of this Bond together with a duly executed written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar. Upon such transfer a new Bond of the same principal amount and bearing the same number will be issued to the transferee in exchange for this Bond, on payment of such charges and subject to such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Bond Ordinance. The Town, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes except to the extent otherwise hereinabove and in the Bond Ordinance provided with respect to the payment of interest, and neither the Town, the Registrar nor the Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. -15- This Bond must be registered in the name of the owner as to both principal and interest on the registration books kept by the Registrar in conformity with the provisions stated herein and endorsed hereon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Bond Ordinance. No transfer of this Bond shall be valid unless made on the registration books maintained at the principal office of the Registrar by the registered owner or his attorney duly authorized in writing. This Bond shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose until the Registrar shall have manually signed the certificate of authentication hereon. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Town Council of the Town of Vail has caused this Bond to be executed with the facsimile signature of the Mayor, and to be signed and attested with the facsimile signature of the Town Clerk under the facsimile seal of the Town. Signeds _ (Facsimile Signature) Mayor (FACSIMILE SEAL) Attests (Facsimile Si nature) Town Clerk -16- Certificate of Authentication for Bond This is one of the Bonds described in the within- mentioned Bond Ordinance, and this Bond has been duly registered on the registration books kept by the undersigned as Registrar for such Bondse Colorado, as Registrar Date of Authentications By Authorized Representative °17- ASSIGNMENT FOR BOND FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and irrevocably appoints , attorney~in~fact, to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premisese Datede NOTICEo The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without any alteration whatsoevere Signature Guaranteedo Addressa Tax Identification Number or Social Security Number(s)o (End of Form of Bond) -18- Section 14. Delivery and Application of Proceeds. When the bonds have been duly sold, executed and registered, the Town shall deliver the bonds to the lawful purchaser thereof on receipt of the purchase price. The registrar shall initially register the bonds in the name of the purchaser, or in the names of such transferees as the purchaser may designate in writing or writings satisfactory to the registrar, or any combination thereof as directed by the purchaser. The proceeds of the bonds (excluding accrued interest and capitalized interest) shall be deposited into the roTown of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District Construction Fund" (the "Construction Fund") which is hereby created, and applied solely to defray the costs and expenses of making the Improvements (including incidental expenses and costs related to the issuance of the bonds). All moneys received as accrued interest and capitalized interest shall be deposited into the Bond Fund to apply to the payment of a portion of the interest due on the bonds through April 1, 1990. -All moneys received as investment income on the Bond Fund shall be retained in the Bond Fund. All moneys received as investment income on the .proceeds of the bonds shall either be used to pay for the Improvements or incidental costs or to pay principal of or interest on the bonds as the Town determines. The purchaser of the bonds shall in no manner be responsible for the application by the Town, or any of its officers, of any of the funds derived from the sale thereof. Section 15. Levy of Assessments. The Town shall cause the assessments to be levied and collected as provided by law for the benefit of the registered owners of the bonds. The Town hereby covenants for the benefit of each owner of the bonds that the costs of the Improvements in. amounts sufficient, together with any excess bond proceeds as provided in Section 10 hereof, to provide for payment of the bonds and interest thereon, shall be apportioned, levied and assessed against the assessable parcels in the District, in accordance with the Charter and the Vail Code, by ordinance to be hereafter adopted. Further, the -19- Town covenants that such assessments will bear interest at a rate which is at least equal to the highest rate of interest on the bonds and payable in one payment or in ten annual installments of principal, on March 1 of each year commencing on March 1, 1990, with interest on the unpaid principal balance of the assessment, payable annually on March 1 of each year commencing March 1, 1990. The Town hereby covenants to use its best efforts to insure that such assessments are levied as soon as possible upon substantial completion of the Improvements and to diligently enforce the lien of the assessments against the property subject thereto. Section 16. Assessment Revenues. All moneys received from such assessments, including interest and any penalties thereon (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 11 hereof), shall be deposited into the Bond Fund and said moneys, along with any other moneys deposited into the Bond Fund pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance, shall be used for the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the bonds and for no other purpose whatsoever, and as security for such payment the Bond Fund is hereby exclusively pledged. Section 17. Books and Records. So long as any of the bonds remain outstanding, the Town will keep or cause to be kept true and accurate books of records and accounts showing full and true entries covering the collection and disposition of special assessments as well as any delinquencies in the collection thereof, covering deposits and disbursements in the Bond Fund, the redemption of bonds, both principal and interest, and disbursements to defray the cost of the Improvements, including incidental expenses; and the Town will permit an inspection and examination of all books and accounts at all reasonable times by a representative of the original purchaser of the bonds. Section 18. Resignation of Registrar or Paying A ent. If the registrar or paying agent initially appointed hereunder shall resign, or if the Town shall reasonably determine that said _. °20° registrar or paying agent has become incapable of fulfilling its duties hereunder, the Town may, upon notice mailed to each registered owner of the bonds at his address last shown on the registration books, appoint a successor registrar or paying agent, or both. 1Vo such resignation or dismissal may take effect until a successor is appointed. Every such successor registrar or paying agent shall be a bank or trust company located in and in good standing in the State of Colorado. It shall not be required that the same institution serve as both registrar and paying agent hereunder, but the Town shall have the right to have the same institution serve as both registrar and paying agent hereunder. Section 19. Authorized Action. The officers of the Town hereby are authorized and directed to take all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this ordinance, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the printing of the bonds (which may include thereon an opinion of bond counsel and related certification by the Town Clerk), the execution of such certificates as may reasonably be required by the initial purchaser thereof or bond counsel, relating, inter alia, to the signing of the bonds, the tenure and identity of the municipal officials, the absence and existence of factors affecting the exemption of interest on the bonds from federal income taxation, the accuracy of property descriptions, the delivery of the bonds and the absence of litigation pending or threatened affecting the validity of the bonds, if such is in accordance with the facts, and the execution of a bond purchase contract and appropriate agreements with respect to the services of paying agent and registrar. Section 20. Bondholders' Ri hts and Remedies. Any owner of any one or more of the bonds may, either at law or in equity, by suit, action, mandamus or other appropriate proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction, protect the lien created by this ordinance on the proceeds of said assessments and the moneys in the Bond Fund, and may by suit, °21° action, mandamus or other appropriate proceedings enforce and compel the performance of any covenant of the Town or any duty imposed upon the Town by the provisions of this ordinance, or any ordinance heretofore or hereafter adopted concerning the District, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the segregation of assessments into the Bond Fund, the proper application thereof and the appointment of a receiver. The failure of any such owner so to proceed shall not relieve the Town, the Council or any of the Town's officers, agents or employees of any liability for failure to perform any such duty. No remedy or right conferred by this ordinance is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy or right, but each such remedy or right is cumulative and may be pursued without waiving any other remedy or right. Section 21. Tax Covenants. The Town covenants for the benefit of the owners of the bonds that it will not take any action or omit to take any action with respect to the bonds, the proceeds thereof, any other funds of the Town, or any facilities financed with the proceeds of the bonds if such action or omission would (i) cause the interest on the bonds to lose its exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the '°Tax Code"), (ii) cause interest on the bonds to lose its exclusion from alternative minimum taxable income as defined in Section 55(b)(2) of the Tax Code except to the extent such interest is required to be included in the adjusted net book income and adjusted current earnings adjustments applicable to corporations under Section 56 of the Tax Code in calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income, (iii) subject the Town to any penalties under Section 148 of the Tax Code, or (iv) cause interest on the bonds to lose its exclusion from Colorado taxable income or Colorado alternative minimum taxable income under present Colorado law. The foregoing covenant shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the payment in full or defeasance of the bonds until the date on which all -22- obligations of the Town in fulfilling the above covenant under the Tax Code and Colorado law have been met. Section 22, Designation as Qualified Tax-Exem t Obligation. The Town hereby designates the bonds as a qualified tax-exempt obligation for purposes of Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Tax Code. Section 23. Amendment or Su lement of Ordinance. This ordinance may be amended or supplemented by an ordinance or ordinances adopted by the Town Council in accordance with the Charter and the Vail Code with or without the receipt by the Town of any additional consideration, with the written consent of the owners of 75 percent of the bonds authorized by this ordinance and outstanding at the time of the adoption of such amendatory or supplemental ordinance; provided, however, that no such ordinance shall have the effect of permittingo (a) an extension of the maturity of any bond authorized by this ordinance without the written consent of the owner of the bond; or (b) a reduction in the principal amount of any bond or the rate of interest thereon without the written consent of the owner of the bond; or (c) the creation of a lien upon or a pledge of property, revenues or funds, ranking prior to the liens or pledges created by this ordinance; or (d) a reduction of the principal amount of bonds required for consent of such amendatory or supplemental ordinance. Section 24. Ratification. All action. (not inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance) heretofore taken by the Town, the Council and the officers of the Town, directed toward the creation of the District, the construction and other acquisition of the Improvements therein, the sale and -23- issuance of the bonds, and the levy of assessments for that purpose, hereby is ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 25. Ordinance Irrepealable. After the bonds have been issued, this ordinance shall constitute a contract between the Town and the owner or owners of the bonds and shall be and remain irrepealable until the bonds and the interest accruing thereon shall have been fully paid, satisfied and discharged. Section 26. Limitation on Challenge. After the expiration of 30 days from the date of final adoption and approval of this ordinance, all actions or suits attacking its findings, determinations and contents or questioning the legality of the bonds .and all proceedings relating thereto shall be perpetually barred, and the ordinance and bonds shall be conclusive of the facts stated therein and shall be conclusively deemed valid and legal in every court or tribunal and shall not be open to contest for any reason. Section 27. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect any other provision of this ordinance. Section 28. Repealer. All ordinances, resolutions, bylaws and regulations of the Town in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. Section 29. Recording; Effective Date. Immediately upon its final passage, this ordinance shall be recorded in the Town book of ordinances kept for that purpose, authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor and the Town Clerk and shall be _.. -24- published in The Vail Trail, a legal newspaper of general circulation in the Town. This ordinance shall take effect five days following its publication after final passage. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING on July 18, 1989. Mayor (SEAL) Atteste Town Clerk ADOPTED AND APPROVED on August 1, 1989. Mayor (SEAL) Atteste Town Cler -25- Council Member duly seconded the motion, and the question being upon the approval on first reading of the foregoing Ordinance, the roll was called with the following result< - Council Members voting "Yes"o Kent R. Rose John C. Slevin Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Michael Cacioppo Thomas Steinberg Council Members voting "No"a Council Members having voted in favor of said motion, the Mayor thereupon declared the Ordinance duly approved on first reading and directed that the Ordinance, as approved, be published once in full in The Vail Trail, a newspaper of general circulation within the Town and legally qualified for Town publications, and that notice of the August 1, 1989 public hearing on the ordinance be published as required by the Vail Code. After consideration of other business to come before the Town Council, the meeting was adjourned. Town Clerk Town of Vail (TOWN SEAL) -26- STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SSo TOWN OF VAIL ) The Town Council of the Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, met in regular session, in full conformity with the Town Charter, ordinances and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations, at the Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado, the regular meeting place thereof, on Tuesday, the 1st day of August, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 p,me The following members of the Town Council were present: Mayoro Kent Ra Rose Mayor Pro Temo John C< Slevin Council Membersa - Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Michael Cacioppo Thomas Steinberg The following members of the Town Council were absent: The following persons were also present: Town Managero Rondall Ve Phillips Town Attorneyo Lawrence Ae Eskwith Town Clerk: Pamela Aa Brandmeyer Director of Admini- strative Services: Charles Wick Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were had and takene - The Mayor informed the Town Council that Ordinance Noo _, Series of 1989, which was introduced, read by title, passed on first reading, approved and ordered published in full at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on July 18, 1989, -27- was duly published in full in The Vail Trail, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town, in its issue of July 21, 1989, and that the publisher's affidavit of said publication is now on file in the office of the Town Clerk. Council Member then introduced said Ordinance a second time and read the Ordinance by its title, sufficient copies of the full Ordinance having previously been made available to the Town Council and to the public. The Mayor then declared that this was the time and place for a public hearing on the Ordinance and the meeting was then opened for such purpose. After all persons had been given an opportunity to speak, the hearing was declared closed. Council Member moved the final approval on second reading of said Ordinance. Council Member duly seconded the motion, and the question being upon the final approval on second reading of the said Ordinance, the roll was called with the following result: Council Members voting "Yes": Kent R. Rose John C. Slevin Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Michael Cacioppo Thomas Steinberg Council Members voting "No": Council Members having voted motion, the Mayor thereupon declared the' approved on second reading and directed that approved, be published by title only in Z newspaper of general circulation within the qualified for Town publications. in favor of said Ordinance finally the Ordinance, as ie Vail Trail; a Town and legally -28- After consideration of other business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned. Town Clerk Town of Vail (T06J1V SEAL) °29- STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SS. TOWN OF VAIL ) I, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, the duly qualified and acting Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, do hereby certify that the foregoing pages 1 to 29, inclusive, constitute a true and correct copy of the Record of the Proceedings of the Town Council of the Town, taken at regular meetings thereof held at the Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado, on. Tuesday, the 18th day of July, 1989, commencing at the hour of 7:30 p.m. and on Tuesday, the 1st day of August, 1989, commencing at the hour of 7130 p.m., as recorded in the official Record of the Proceedings of the Town kept in my office, insofar as said proceedings relate to Ordinance No. _, Series of 1989, authorizing the issuance of the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District Bonds, Series 1989; that said proceedings were duly had and taken; that said meetings were duly held; and that the persons were present at said meetings as therein shown. It is hereby further certified that the Ordinance was published in full in The Vail Trail, a newspaper published and having general circulation in the Town and legally qualified for Town publications, on July 21, 1989, and by title only in said newspaper on August 4, 1989, as evidenced by the affidavits of publication attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set her hand and the seal of the Town this day of August, 1989, (TOWN Town Clerk SEAL) Town of Vail -30- Affidavit of publication of Ordinance in full and notice of public hearing thereon. -31- Affidavit of publication of Ordinance by title only. -32- STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SS. TOW1~T OF VAIL ) The Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the Town Charter and tr.e applicable laws, rules and regulations of the Town, at the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado, the regular meeting place thereof, on Tuesday, the 18th day of July, 1989, at the hour of 7e30 p.m. The following members of the Town Council were present: Mayoro Kent R. Rose Mayor Pro Teme John C. Slevin Councilmemberso Eric Affeldt Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Michael Cacioppo Thomas Steinberg The following members of the Town Council were absent: The following persons were also presenta Town Managere Rondall V, Phillips Town Attorney: Lawrence A. Eskwith Town Clerko - Pamela A. Brandmeyer Director of Admini- strative Servicese Charles Wick Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were had and takena Council Member introduced and moved the approval on first reading of the following Ordinance, which was then read by title, sufficient copies of the full Ordinance having previously been made available to the Town Council and to the publica 'C1 taws of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2105 office of flown manager July 27, 1989 Ms. Athena Buxman 3797 East Lupine Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ms. Buxmans Thank you again for your letter of July 18 regarding your proposal to trade Lot 1 of the Bighorn Second Addition, for the Town's assistance in filling the pond on Lot 5 and thereby creating a developable lot. After discussion of your proposal with the Town's planning staff, it appears that a number of approvals would be necessary prior to any modification of the 100-year floodplain on Lot 5. We have identified the followings 1. A Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission approval of a floodplain modification is required. This would require the submittal of an Environmental Impact report, and more specifically the hydraulic analysis necessary for the floodplain modification. 2. An Army Corps of Engineers permit, either an Individual or a Nationwide Permit, would be required. 3. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), would also be required. Due to the specific expertise necessary to complete the Environmental Impact Report and the required Town of Vail approvals, I believe it would not be in the Town's best interest to pursue your proposal. However, the Town would be willing to assist you through the required processes should you decide to pursue the floodplain modification on your own. o,_a ~ Thank you again for contacting us and if you should have any questions please feel free to contact mee Sin ely Rondall Vo Phil ips Town Manager MM/RPalr cco Vail Town Council Peter Patten Mike Mollica i THE DENVER POST' Michelle Mahoney !fail Valley bonanza The Vail Valley Marketing Board is reeling.from the success of its suynmer marketing program. The newspaper and radio cam- Monday, July 31, 1989 , ~-. paign, developed by Schenkein Advertising, triggered a flood of phone calls from potential visitors both~within Colorado and from out of state. In the first two weeks the cam- paign ran in Colorado newspapers and on state radio stations, the Vail Resort Association got an' additional 30 to 50 phone calls a day. Just hours after advertising.be- gan to run in Dallas and Kansas City, NIo., 60 calls came in., "They're getting between 30 and 80 additional calls just from the Front Range than they were get- ting before, and that's a great re- sponse," said Dave Reece, man- agement supervisor with Schenkein. Reece said advertisements in the DenveryPost were the leading generators of Colorado inquiries. Schenkein worked with a budget of $516,000 from the towns of Vail and Avon and Vail Associates. The board's three-year goal is to increase summer-tourism=related sales and sales taxes 10'percent to 15 percent over the 1988 bench- mark of $3.1 million in sales tax revenue. At year-end,_the success of the campaign will be gauged on the sales tax impact, Reece said. The Front Range campaign be- gan in early June. Dallas and Kan- sas.City were targeted in July. '~ JUL 3 11989 July 26, 1989 Council Members Vail Town Council 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Council Members: ~' j -~( ,, I '! ' ~~ ~ ~ ~~a Riv~ ,--, ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~.~~~ After reading a story in the July 14th issue of The Vail Trail and reviewing the current controversy regarding the trail along Gore Creek from Bridge Street to Vail Road, I am strongly inclined to oppose such a proposition. In taking a walk along parts of Gore Creek, I realized that many owners who are in the proposed path plan would lose valued privacy and would quote "look like a side street at Disneyland". Would it not be a wiser decision to plan a sidewalk and bike path from Bridge Street along East Meadow Drive to the Medical Center ending on West Meadow Drive? If any of you have ever walked or ridden your bike along this drive you have seen that such a path is greatly needed along West Meadow Drive. where pedestrians and drivers are constantly wondering which side to take refuge while on their way to the library or on their way to lunch in the Village. The Medical Center addition has certainly enhanced its entrance and built a useful sidewalk that allows for pedestrians and bike riders alike. I'm certain the cost to complete a walkway from that point to Bridge Street would be more cost effective as well as leaving nature untouched along the creek. I do believe it is wise to improve both East .and West Meadow Drive with a walkway rather than create controversy with anew trail along Gore Creek. Concerned, ~Jt.~vr~.c~~ ~. d - ffa~~'(L ~ Franck G.O. Roble FR:kak r~ Division of "hhe Vail 44 Corporation 44 West Me~:adow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 303 0 476-4"Z 7 1 ~- Tie °~yr~~ea~ Grp &~ox ~ai1,Colorac9o s16S's ~F76-z2o•a R~; u ~~~L 3 ~ 'fa.i..l. Town Council 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 8165? July 27, 1989 Dear Playor and Town Council Plembers, The people of Vail have elected you to plan the town°s future development in the hope you would do what is necessary in the best interest of residents and visitors alike. I am very disappointed to see the Town bowing to shall, self-interest groups rather than maintaining what is best for the majority. The streamwalk along the Gore Creek has been on the master plan for 1? years. It should greatly enhance our beautiful village, allowing residents and visitors alike to enjoy Vail°s natural beauty without the hassel of buses, cars, delivery trucks, bikes and skateboards: I understand the adjacent property owners not wanting a walkway near their property, but the fact that this is public land and the master plan has indicated this type of use for 1? years should allow the majority to decide, Recently, Most of the issues affecting Vail°s future have been lobbied successfully by a vocal and pushy minority of special-interest groups. It is the council's duty to serve the community and see that the best interests, of the $own°s future prevail. In the event that a conflict of interest arises with a councilmember, I believe it should be the councilmember's duty to abstain from voting. Sinc®rely, Pepi Langegger The Tyrolean Inn Vail ValleU Communing Television MINUTES FROM THE VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY TELEVISION BOARD MEETING August 2, 1989 8000 AM Attendeese Jerry Davis Reggie O'Brien Brian Hall REC't) AUG - 81989 Brian Hall briefed the Board about the current status of activities at Channel 23. The adult workshops were going well. The teen workshop did not have the attendance that was expected. Jerry Davis suggested that the teen attend the adult session because the quota was not there for the teen workshop. There are minimum quotas for all workshops to be achieved, otherwise the workshops need to be canceled or reschedueled. A new pay structure has been established for ongoing productions. Simple filming scale is $50, and $75 for complex productions. Talent for commentary on any ongoing production is $20/event. Other than ongoing production, any additional productions need to have the approval of the majority of the Board. It is the policy of the Board that any time free talent/labor can be obtained, that that.is what the Channel should strive for. Grants are available to cover up to 100% of the cost of a production. The producer of the production is responsible for all payment for filming, etc.. Channel 23 is responsible for the payment of ongoing productions because the Channel is the executive producer.- Criteria for acceptable grant topics needs to be formulated. Bill Perkins is to continue to negotiate with the papers for advertising space to generate public awareness for the Channel. The Superintendent of schools is to be approached about the possibility of film production programs becoming part of the students' curriculum. The program would be sponsored by WCTV. Sessions might also be held in Eagle, although Eagle is not part of the Channel 23 coverage area at this time. Post Otf ce I3ox 1263 Vail, Colorado 51658 ~, People responsible for the pproduction of the Town Council meetings need to produce a header and tail for the video. A "new" professional look needs to be established. There is the possibility of a jointly produced program with KZYR. The show would focus on current topics of local interest and people from the Vail Valley. Jerry and Brian will discuss this in further detail. The P.A. system needs to be checked in the Avon and Vail town Council rooms to improve thE~ quality of the audio. Press releases need to be sent out informing the public that during non-programming hours>, National Public Radio can be heard on Channel 23. cc: Bill James Ron Phillips Bill Sweeney Vail Vallee CornmunitU Television MINUTES FROM THE VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY TELEVISION BOARD MEETING July 19, 1989 8:00 AM Attendeese Jerry Davis Reggie O'Brien Brian Hall Bill Perkins ~EC°~ AUG - 8 1989 The minutes from the previous meeting were reviewed and approved. The minutes from this meeting were sent to the three representatives from the local town councils in Vail, Minturn and Avon to keep them abreast of Channel 23 activities. Brian informed the Board about the various equipment purchases that have been made. A total of $16,500 of equipment has been ordered. A Laird Character Generator was ordered for $7,500 which has 70 fonts and 2 disk drives. The CG is upgradeable, fast and has good resolution. As per earlier discussions, the cost of producing a silk screen for the Channel 23 T-shirts was reviewed. A three color logo was accepted. The response to the adultwork is good but the teen workshop is still lacking. Josh Hall will explore a number of avenues to get the word out about the workshops. The council meetings were discussed. The is still an audio problem. There was a discussion of a shotgun mike being used to solve the problem. The cost for cases for the portable system is estimated to be about $1,000. Miscellaneous for mikes, cables, and connectors would be an additional $500. Anew 1/2 inch edit system is in the range of $8-9K. There is the possibility of ordering an additional two camcorders. Revenue of $45 for ballet dubs was submitted to the treasurer. Post ()If ce Box 1263 Vail, Colorado 81658 Jerry Davis had suggested t:hat KZYR might be able to subsidize a show that had an interview format. Local politicians, celebrities and other of public interest would be interviewed for 10-20 minutes bringing the show to be an hour long. KZYR would be able to meet some public: broadcasting requirements and the Channel would have an intez-esting, ongoing program. cc: Bill. James Ron Phillips~~ Bill Sweeney Council - Just a Reminder The Fire Department orientation meeting will be held Thursday, 8/10, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon, at the Village Fire Station. ~C~- /bsc AMERICA'S TOP RESORTS at the skier's ability level, waiting time for lifts taken, snow conditions on runs skied, quality of eating places at the area, quality of schooUlearning experience if lessons were taken, and the overall skiing pleasure. Resort Experience: The Report Card also asked for ratings of 1 to 5 on six items related to the resort experience-the range of accommodations, quality of ac- commodations, range and quality of food, alternative daytime activities apart from downhill skiing, nightlife, accessibility. ®verall Skiing Pleasure: One com- ponent of the Reader's Overall Resort Rating, the Skiing Pleasure score, re- flects the reader's general impression of intangibles other than skiing, such as helpfulness of employees, attractiveness of facilities, convenience, cleanliness, crowds. Rating. 1 to 5 skiers. Apres-ski and nightlife: The opinions of readers on whether the resort has an adequate number and variety of bars, discos, dance spots, sleigh rides, etc., had they chosen to patronize them. Rat- ing: 1 to 5 moons. ~d Dining out: The opinion of readers on the range of eating places and quality of food in the general area. Rating. 1 to 5 knives and forks. Alternative daytime activities: The opinion of readers on facilities apart from downhill skiing, for doing other things they enjoy, like cross-country skiing, shopping, swimming, working out. Rat- ing 1 to 5 swimmers. headers' Comments: Opinions offered in answer to open-ended questions about strong points and the weak points of the area's skiing and of the resort experience. VVhy did Snow G'OUNTRY score natural snowfall at some areas, snowmaking coverage at others? For areas east of the Mississippi, snowmaking is so crucial that areas can operate without any natu- ral snow at all. For them, the key statistic is the amount of terrain snowmaking (Continued on page 113) CENTRAL & SOUTHERN! ROCKIES SNOW COUNTRY Ski Dimensions Score Index COLORADO THE CHAMPION KEEPS IMPROVING fter 26 seasons, Vail is a true vaca- tion mecca that continues to astound and delight skiers. It scored the highest on our Ski Dimensions Index. Readers praised the diversity of runs and their grooming, but grumbled about long lines and crowds. Last year's news was the opening of China Bowl which, on paper, doubled ter- rain and made skiing in the south-facing back bowls more inviting to advanced in- termediates. High-speed chairs have also changed the way people ski Vail. The coming winter's headliner is the Avanti Express, the resort's seventh high-speed detachable quad. It provides an alterna- tive to the Lions Head gondola as a way of reaching the summit and should rekin- dle interest in skiing the long intermedi- ate runs that lie west of Vail's first-gener- ation quads. At Vail, vacationers find everything they expect at a top resort-a highly pro- fessional children's center, spas, a giant indoor skating rink, Sybervision ski teaching, a roster of 850 instructors, sleighrides, squash, cross-country and more. But here they also get a bonus: a sophisticated village with several dozen restaurants and streets perfect for win- dow-shopping and celebrity-ogling. Readers were impressed by the night- time distractions and by the accommoda- tions, many of which are within walking distance of the lifts. They expressed dis- pleasure about expense and "snobbery." Vail is a 100-mile straight shot along Interstate 70 from Denver's Stapleton Airport. It is possible to fly to nearby Avon or Eagle County airports, then rely on the public system to get around the resort. What readers said .. . "Strong point-terrain and snow, lift capacity." "Lots to do besides skiing." "Quality of accommodations." "Diversity ...well maintained." Vertical drop: 3,250 feet. Skiable terrain: 3,787 acres; 54% most difficult, 36% more difficult, 10% easier. Uphill transport 1988-89: 1 gondola, 6 high-speed detachable chairs, 12 fixed chairs, 2 platter lifts. Natural snowfall 1987-88: 340 inches. Snowmaking: covers 8% of terrain. Lift price for adults 1989-90: $33 per day, based on a 6-day ticket. How readers rated their experience: Overall ski pleasure ~ ~, Nightlife and apres-ski ~ (( Dining out ~j ~~ ~( ~~ Activities besides Alpine skiing ~ ~ ~~ Contact: Vail Beaver Creek Central Res- ervations,(800)525-2257. In the heart of Vail Pillage, vehicle-free malls and an archi- tecture reminiscent of the Alps. 4>1 SNOW COUNTRY/SEPTEMBER 1989 ~x.?' ~ fc'T~ azi.;~ NY ~'"s~ "{' 4 y,p'.'"'s`'IS ~~{ ~ ~ ~ i i~rF~~ ^r ~r[ Y~~ f;. ~ x '~~ ~'~ f' +` ~:7~"` ~-4 x ~ ; i w fi, ~.-~ F'. ~ ~'}; i'~ ~t_( { .# rt > j ~};, +~,~' 3 :~. ~' r r ,,,, ~ 4 -~+5~•'t-s t ++~ ~` t~ :,.- ~, ~. ; rr~(r ';~y,) :j~ .~` ut ~ #` ~ G ~ r ,~`t, .?+l ~ 41` ~~ '.• ? s S ' w`~, ~ '-'~i ;~ =~ -Y "4 ~v ~ti i ~'., tf __ 'k ,~,,,y~C v, T '-' z ~ c:r. ~, t,;~ ~'~` i ~ ~,e £ ~~~Y1 hr a ; ~ ~ , . ~ n , 'a ~ ~ 1'~'t Ana '~ w )„m -, - ~ , '~'{• ~ ~~: '7'' '9+f~,.tc -v4 'If~3'^ r~ 2L'~'~ 'L`~ ~' '~ a~ 3 ~.,M aY ~~i~ ti '.`k; ~.+~~'; ~`r~` ~+.14~;t ~+ i,. '' _~~,. r v,•-y g ~ r =AG ~a "'4+~t y'~F ,,,, ~.,~ L -' ~'~'' x °£' 1 r ~ -C R 1'*~ Fe .r ~ i 'v."~' `~~. :F 1s 1r"'~'ry'~~-, :1''a't:,~' ;#rt~rY~Y~'t~+~ `~~F'a ~' ~; ir~r~„~s- ". ,fin iy~Y:'~i r,t~• ; ~_M, j~ r.:"; ,,at~~~7~y~ ..~,~y~~yy~~ ~"~.~ ~~ ; ~~ `~~Y~I~ ~ 4„$r '1 'q{',~-.~ ti 'H"iy .. it ~ :. ,,x,p ~6' tk -~-~s~"~r`~t .v G ~ 'f'~ ~::'}~~~ '':?te J~F. ~ ~~.: e t + ~ n ~ r ~'~ ~yy S ~ ~~~' s ti 4',~. ~ . ' .'~ts~' . ~ ?`' ~~ ~.* ., r ti. .: ti ,~ ~ ~ h i s -~>_ s' -, ~~~ ~ ` Y' ~.~. 2 r ~'ti-~t+qF~ ~~~~i"'~,y ~~ ~„i~# " .`g}+L~Y ~ti+, r tkc yi ~` t~n 1~.r, r.5"'F,~ ~ ~. ~,i A,#~-v y,~ ~,~ ~ ~ - ~ * F =~ !~ ,f %~', y ~`-t x ~.~. ~~'*a } ~~' ~ 1 Y R ~ ; ~'f C +K~ ti lh 'r ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ Y-} s°-' t `~~, '~~4 t P r~.`r~~ 'L S ~ i*.e e U._ t 21 ~' ~fS~ ~ _. a J 7 ~~ r .~ ~ 'a ~ri r ~ .. ,~,~ ~ ~ .~.' T ~ "~',;~. ~ :? ~`,~~~~qrr J, ~{r Rt"Y'~ ~F ri ir;~~ * a ~ -` ~~ r,~'"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N ti o'},~~ ,.,~1~ ~ ~ ~ ` t. , -. ... ,« y3 ~atc K ti .. t ~. , ~ r ,.1Y, r af~, ,,~, try _ t 77 t t ~ ~ f i ~'~~t .r ~F ~,.^4r ; ~ ~ F t ~~.. ~~ ~ ~i r+~ir'~ ,~ -'u~h.-i i'"C y ~ ., i. r.. ~! .1 ; - ; '?r' ti~dr ~ ~.y {~ ~ c r r ~^': *,~ Y'`~{',~ .~ r.i A rf'4e. ~. :.• R~ i ..,. ~/~ ~:. y,j'~,~ ~ z, (" 4 S r :a ~+ t~' ~ ~ 4- ~."'~ ~ ~ r '' T'f- 4 s, s t ` Q ti.' `+ a' , ~tYw. i+r n' ++ ?~# f ?K7,=4 ~ ;~t''~~'f'C l L J ? ~, A ,xs 1^f ?; - r Yc ~'.-.~j y, 3 3'~,*~'~"^ ~ as ~: ~~ t.~ 4 t=~. P' ~ ~ ~' y'~ ~ ,v~. i~ .l. ti a ~ { R.: a ~~ 'g }Jr+ f °t ss-t c~ i,*y ~ ~,t,,;- y w~ #.,, ~~,.~r i~%x~ ,~ _J ~r n .r, ft 71 k ~~ :i is r :-, rt ' ,.:r-~ "'_ i - ~' - t W.. ..1=~~ s ,r.t~ ,~ ~ ~ Y_ Y ~~: S~ t r~,' r i ,.- ...._ . ~ - ~ ' -- - ' r .~ , ~ ~ `~ ~titi. i -Y ~ c j ~~~ n. + + 4. 3~r ii 1"~ WY ~ a ~. ~ /~~~~ ~fyy4ty t ~' ~J.~ .~ ~ ~. i i - ~~'~ ~ { ~ ~, ~µ, ~+~ytia ~in i~ S~~ r f/~~L18i+'7i`R `~ +!~~ r \V~/j k ~~r J x ~a r 's: ti ~ _ ~ +~ ~ z x :t;~ i r. . .. t"- ~~r ~. ~~ _ _ 1` ~ r1 ~ ~' , ~ IY1~ ~YT '. - V:~:~{ pia:, ~ f~ ~ - ~ ~ s ~ ~ i ~~~ ~'~ ~ ~ '_ - ;r f Y + ~ ~`~ ~ ~+i ' ~ a ,~ ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ R 'tiff ~*» '~ ~ ._ .. t.~~ f ,~ 7~'t a _.~ ... :~ v ~_ .. - .._: tT+~Sf.„ ~~ _. _._ __ __. ~~ 1 ~~~ ~~ 4 ~''? ,- ~f. ~ '.i"_'hra: r.Ra+~1. 9 ~'F` ~.rrt s~*:° j ~~ 4 h ~., } ~~.4,;,, y ,. ".. ~~' ~?s ~'~:lr~j ~ti ~, ht,~y.. / S"`~i r- H+;}y*. J ~~.sL'. ~ S .. .. ~:, , -~ .. ever, they tended to rate higher--4, very good. Basically, readers liked the places where they skied. Asked to score each aspect on a scale from 1 for poor to 5 for autstanding, most readers awarded 3's or 4's. Readers were as restrained in :sanding out 5's as they were in assigning `~'s and 1's. When individual readers' scores were averaged together, most re- ~ults were in the 3.50 to 4.50 range-no ~:~iace perfect, but no place unsatisfac- ory. Perhaps readers had higher expec- ltions when they went to a legendary ;estination. Perhaps homeowners and ~assholders were more critical of places :hey ski all the time. Bear in mind that readers were not isked to rate one area against others. It snot that readers thought Mt. X had Netter snow than Mt. Y, or better lodging ~r food. It is only possible to say that the ~eaders who rated X gave it a higher :;core than the readers who rated Y. HAS SHE WORDS AND YNI®LS MEAN Ski Dimensions Index: The weighted average based on the area's vertical drop; number of skiable acres; percentage of terrain rated most difficult; the number of days of operation in the preceding full season; the number of gondolas, trams and high-speed detachable chairs. For areas east of the Mississippi, the percent- age of terrain covered by snowmaking is figured in. For areas in the West, the figure used was the number of inches of natural snow that fell in 1987=88, the last complete season at the time the areas were queried. Maximum score: 100. Srvow COUNTRY Score: The rating of the total vacation experience for each of the 351ikeliest vacation spots, combining the Ski Dimensions Index (100-point maxi- mum score) with Readers' Overall Rat- ings (see below; 1.00 to 5.00, multiplied by 10) for Ski and Resort Experience. The Snow COUNTRY Score is a way of recognizing all the aspects that affect a holiday-lodging and food as well as lifts and snow conditions-and of combining objective statistics with skiers' opinions. Maximum score: 150. headers' Overall hating: These were . derived from weighted averages of the Readers' Rating of the Experience at the Mountain (the ski experience) and Expe- rience Around the Resort (the resort ex- perience). To construct the Readers' Overall Rating, the mountain-related items counted for 65%, the resort-relat- ed items for 35%. Maximum score: 5.00. 1VIountain Experience: The Skier's Re- port Card asked the reader to rate (on a scale of 1 for poor, 2 for fair, 3 for satisfac- tory, 4 for very good and 5 for outstand- ing) six items related to skiing-terrain at 35 TOP VACATION SKI PRESORTS-HOW THEY COMPARE. n the following pages, Snow Country profiles 35 ski resorts~selected,as a destination by our readers We ~ :~ have ranked them in the table be]ow by a - " . ."Srrow.CourrTxY Score" that combines ob' i sect ve statistics ~ _~ ( Ski Dimensions Index") of „ . each. resort's size. and facilities with subjective ratings by readers of the skiing and resort experience: The Ski Dimensions Index is shown separately in the. right-hand column. `Rank Area Ski Snow CounPrRx :Dimensions ~ Snow CourITrtr~ Score Index Rank Ar .k Ski ~ .. Dimensions 1 Vail, Cola 129 87 ea Score 12 Copper IV1tn., Cola 109. Index :I 70 2 Squaw Valley, Calif. 125 84 Okemo,Vt: 209 67 `~ 3 Mt. Bachelor. -Ore. 121 77 13 Keystone, Colo. 107 ... 64 4 Steamboat; Cola 120 80 Sun Valley, Idaho 107- 64 5 Mammoth Mtn., Calif. , 119 80 14 Deer Valley, Utah - 106 + 62 _ 6 Snowmass, Colo. 118 76 _ ~~ 15 ~ ~ Sunday River,: iVle. ~ `~ 104 ~ ~ . ~ 62 ~ ~° ~Tackson Hole, Wyo. 118 77 16 Crested Butte; Cola ,`° :103 62 7 Park City, Utah ll 5 - 72 Taos Ski Valley, ,N. M. 103 - 63 8 ~_ Wmter_Park, Cola ~ ~ ~~ 113 ~ 74 ~ ~ _ 17 Hunter'Mtn., N.Y. ~ 102 ~' 66 9 Beaver, Creek .Cola 112 69 .Telluride, `Colo: ° , ~ ` ~ - 102 ~ ~ 61 ~ ~ ~~ Breckenridge, Colo. 112 71 18 Mount Snow, Vt: 100 61 Snowbird, Utah ~ ~ 112 72 ~ . ~. Whiteface, N. Y, ~ 100 ~ 64 'Alta„Utah ., ~ 112 72 19Waterville Valley, N.H. 99 63 ., ~10 Bi Sk Mont. g y~ . 111 67 20 - ,{ =Sugarbush, Vt: - 95 ~ ;' 59 ~ = ~ Heavenly, Calif. 111 76 „ . 21. , . n Stowe, Vt.~ ~ "_93 . ;~ ' ~ 56 - Killington, Vt. 111. 73 22 -Loon Mountain, N. H. 89 .. 54 Sugarloaf, Me. 111 70 Stratton Mountain, Vt. 89 55 11 Aspen Mountain, Colo. 110 68 ~' SNOW COUNTRY/SEPTEMBER 1989 4? lowo v 75 south 4rontag® road vs~il, Colorado 89 657 (303) 47g-29 58 department of public works/transportation MEMORANDUM T0: Ron Phillips FROM: Skip Gordon DATE: August 1, 1989 RE: 1989 Ridership Compared To 1988 DTI., ~9~9 Below are the statistics showing total ridership for 1989 compared to that of 1988 for the month of JULY. INTOWN W. VAIL E. VAIL SANDSTONE 1988 148,042 3,943 2,734 978 1989 159,300 3,875 2,944 895 Difference 11,258 68 210 83 8 o UP 2 % DOWN 8 % UP 8 % DOtNN Grand Total - Intown, W. Vail, E. Vail ~ Sandstone - 1988 Grand Total - Intown, 4V. Vail, E. Vail ~ Sandstone - 1989 Difference SG{slh 155,697 167,014 11,317 7% UP cc: Stan Berryman Charlie Wick RECD AUG ° ? ~G9 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, Recently I've been reading articles and editorials commenting on our right to clean air inside public buildingso As a five year resident of Vail I would support some sort of regulation or ordinance to ban smoking in all public placeso This is not unlike the Town of Vail ordinance which prohibits smoking in all municipal facilitieso But it is one step short, and left up to valley area citizens to decide on their own health and welfareo Its true smoking is a serious health issue nat only for those that smoke, but also for those inhaling that smoke indirectlyo Being forced to breathe smoke while shopping, dining, or working is not only inhuman but may result in deatho Toxic effects of sidestream smoke are more potent than inhaling directly because the smoke is unfiltered and contains 4700 chemical compounds including dangerous chemicals like hydrogen cyanide, arsenic, carbon monoxide, ammonia, formaldehyde, radioactive compounds, benzene, vinyl chloride, carcinogenic tars, sulfur dioxide, and of course nicotined If cities and towns like Denver, Aspen,-Boulder, Colorado Springs, Grand Junction, Fort Collins, Loveland, Golden, Telluride, and counties of Arapahoe, Boulder, and Jefferson have imposed restrictions on smoking in public places to protect the health, welfare, and safety of the general publico Why is Vail and other valley wide communities not amoung these progressive townso I must make my plea to the local press, town council members throughout Eagle county and the people that live and work in this valley, we must resolve this health problem immediatelyo Our communities must take the initiative to do what many large corporation and 26 other cities in Colorado have done, ban smoking in the workplace and all public placeso -2- We Iive in this beautiful and expanse environment, we enjoy the outdoors year round, but why can't we breathe clean air indoors. I have nothing against smokers but be polite, smoke in private where the smoke will only affect yourself. Please don't impose your habit on others. Smoking control Iaws do not apply to private homes, offices or cars. It is only when smoking affects and endangers the health of innocent people that it should be subject to restriction. In this day and age as a nation we try to~protect our environment from toxic substances, pollution and smoke in the air we breathe outdoors. Let us work together as a community to guarantee the quality of the air we breathe indoors. Sincerely, L' ~' Craig De Cloux cc/ Vail Daily Vail Trail Avon-Beaver Creek Times-- Vail Town Council Members R~AUG-7t9a9 INDOOR AIR FACTS ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE! WHY DOES EVERYBODY HAVE TO BREATHE IT!? There are 43 carcinogenic compounds in tobacco smoke. Some substances are mutagenic, which means they can cause permanent, often harmful, changes in the genetic material of cellso Many of these compounds are treated as hazardous when emitted into outdoor air and are controled by government standardsa There has not been ANY government control over the pollutants of indoor air pollution, and on an average, people spend 90% of their time indoorsa .WHAT"S THE BIG DEAL ABOUT ALITTLE SMOKE? Three major bodies. were independently convened to consider the public health implications of passive smoking, The Surgeon General, National Research Council and Environmental Cancer, Lung and Heart Deseasem Their findings reported, a substantial number if the lung cancer deaths that occur in among nonsmokers can be attributed to involuntary smokingo" Within this next month the town council will be approached by citizens concerning this health issued There should be an ordinance against smoking in public places, There already is a ban on smoking in Town of Vail opperated areas-Let"s be consistant and follow this ordinance into indoor facilities that affect the publico A Concerned 'tizen, Ja ver cc/ Vail Daily Vail Trail Avon/Beaver Creek Times Vail Town Council Members @OWn DI V31 75 sou4h 9ron4aga road bail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2116 MEMORANDUM TOe Vail Town Council FROMo Steve Barwick / DATEe August 4, 1989 RE: Proposed 1990 Capital Projects Please find attached, the proposed 1990 Capital Projects list developed by staffs The projects are listed in recommended priority order> Staff will discuss each item with you in more detail at the next Council Work Sessiono SHB/ds CAPSCHD9 Revised: 8/ 3/1989 REQUIRED PROJECTS 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CONDITIONS/COMMENTS --- 1. ---------------------------------------- Handicap Access Van ----------- 25,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------------------------- 2. - W. Gore Creek Dr. Bridge (grant match) ---------------------------------------- 182,500 ----------- ----------- ---------- --- $160,000 in State revenue -- S UBTOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS 207,500 0 - 0 --- ----- 0 ----------- 0 -------------------------------- ESSENTIAL PROJECTS ---- ----- --- --- -- 1990 -- ----- 1991 1992 1993 1994 --- 1. -------- -- ----- ---- ---- Street Maint. & Improvements -- -- 1,345,000 ----------- 1,676,000 ----------- 1,280,000 ----------- 1,810,000 ----------- 1,957,000 -------------------------------- Per street maintenance plan 2. Street Light Improvement 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Per street light plan 3. Communications System Maint. & Replcmnt 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Ongoing radio replacement 4. Misc. Bldg. Maintenance 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 Per RAM Committee plan 5. Bus Replacement 465,000 696,000 513,000 897,000 1,125,000 Per bus replacement schedule 6. Recreational Paths Maintenance 77,000 81,000 85,000 89,000 93,000 Per paths maintenance plan 7. Parking Structures Projects 30,000 30,000 80,000 60,000 275,000 Per structures maintenance plan 8. TOV Shop Maint. & Improvements 110,000 120,000 150,000 235,000 125,000 Per maintenance plan 9. Library Children"s Area Remodel 10,000 Acoustically separate children 10. Bus Interior Refurbishment 26,000 11. Municipal Bldg/Post Office Remodel 490,000 12. Overlay Municipal Bldg Parking Lots 45,000 13. Fire Truck Replacement Program 350,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 14. Fire Dept. Furniture & Carpet 25,000 15. Bus Shelter Improvements 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Replacements & additions 16. W. Meadow Dr. Conceptual Design 27,000 17. Additional Buses ~ - ---- --- --- --- --- - - 163,000 179,000 --- --- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- SUBTOTAL ESSENTIAL PROJECTS ----- --- 3,165,000 ----------- 2,996,000 ----------- 2,338,000 ------------ 3,500,000 ----------- 3,805,000 ------------------------------- DESIRABLE PROJECTS -- ---- - - 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 --- 1. ---------- --- ------ ------- ------- Sidewalk Improvements ---------- 15,000 ----------- 15,000 ----------- 15,000 ------------ 15,000 ----------- 15,000 ------------------------------- 2. Holy Cross Purchase 75,000 45,0(10 45,000 45,000 45,000 3. Sidewalk: Muni Bldg to Village Parking 10,800 124,200 4. Pulis Bridge Widening 200,000 5. Village Improvement District 250,000 250,000 6. Traffic Control Gates - -- -- - 20,000 --- ---------- ------ -- ----------------- SUBTOTAL DESIRABLE PROJECTS ---------- 310,000 ----------- 320,800 ----------- 434,200 ------------ 60,000 ----------- 60,000 ------------------------------- CAPSCHD9 Revised: 8/ 3/1989 TOWN OF VAIL REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROPOSED PROJECTS 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 CONDITIONS/COMMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Recreation Trails 168,000 2. Landscape Improvements 100,000 fiord Park Lower Bench Improvments 32,000 ~. Donovan park Development 555,000 Open Space Purchase 75,000 dot Play Area - Buffehr Creek Park T, Ford Park Skating/Fishing Pond 300,000 300,000 230,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 6,000 84,000 250,000 Per Recreation Trails Plan 100,000 Per Landscape Plan ' TOTAL 930,000 740,000 650,000 330,000 350,000 TG «V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJE:C~T DEPARTI•SE'~T I DIVISION I Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Handicap Access Van PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`1PLETION DATE: Purchase of van with wheelchair lift. an will be available on-call as part of Town's bus system. FUND i/i AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 199 PLAIr'NING/DESIGN LAA'D ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IDIPROVE*fEA'TS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLAINT I DEVELOPMENTS & II`iPROVE"ANTS 25,000 1 0 TOTAL 125,000 PROJECT FUNDING AL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 199( NEW PERSON\'EL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S 1,0 CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL I 1,00 FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECTI 1992 1993 19.94 'TOTAL pRIORITY RATINGS AI'10I4G . DEPARTDIENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~ SL'8`tIT~°FT1 nv. DATE: TGti~V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMFROVE:ME(VT FROJEC~r DEPARTPIE:~T I DIVISION I p.. 1.1 , .. T.T_ __1_ _ ~~- PROJECT TITLE: West Gore Creek Drive Bridge PROJECT STARTING DATE• Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~1F'LETION DATE: This is an 80~ State of Colorado/20~ Town of Vail project. $160,000 of revenue will be shown in the 1990 CIP revenue budget. FUND ~i AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.9.92 I 19 I 1994 POST 1994 TO PLANNING/DESIG\' LAA'D ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING•b_STREET DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVE*fENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & I1•fE'ROVE*~NTS 182,50 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL • FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1990 '1991 .1992 199 •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS _ OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT CO•"'LENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 19.94. TOTAL pRIORITY ' RATINGS AMONG llEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS ByITTED By• D,1TE TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STREET IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND q AND TITLE: 30 PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1992 1993 PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 1345100 1676390 1280360 1810000 1957200 8069pS0 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTVRE 6 PLANT DEVEEOPMENTS ~ IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 1994 TOTAL 1345100 1676390 1280360 1810000 1957200 8069050 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 1345100 1676390 1280360 1810000 1957200 8069050 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1990 1991 NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED <FTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES to SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION „ CONTINUES CURRENT ON-GOING FROCRAM SU'IfMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: t 1992 1993 1994 TOTAL PRIORITY RA'CINCS AMONG DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS . + INTERMOUNTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1990 ROAD LENGTH Kinnickinnick Road 1,900 L.F. Lupine Court 400 L.F. Bellflower Drive 1,000 L.F. Basingdale Boulevard 2,800 L.F. Snowberry Drive 2,000 L.F. Larkspur Court 200 L.F. Larkspur Lane 900 L.F. Geneva Drive 950 L.F. Alpine Drive 1,500 L.F. Sierra Trail 600 L.F. TOTAL 12,250 L.F. MAINTENANCE PAVING ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AN D TESTING - 1990 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING - 1991 TOTAL - 1990 PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST $ 123,500 $ 34,000 $ 85,000 $ 238,000 $ 200,000 $ 17,000 $ 76,500 $ _95,000 $ 150,000 ~ 60,000 $1,079,000 $ 100,000 $ 116,100 $ 50,000 $1,345,100 0' STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1991 ROAD Booth Falls Road Booth Falls Court Bald Mountain Road Mann's Ranch Road Katsos Ranch Road Greenhill Court Westhaven Circle Westhaven Drive LENGTH 1,100 L.F. 700 L.F. 3,000 L.F. 900 L.F. 1,500 L.F. 1,450 L.F. 3,100 L.F. 350 L.F. Westhaven Lane 1,000 L.F. TOTAL 16,150 L.F. NTAINTENANCE PATCHING ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND TESTING - 1991 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING - 1992 TOTAL - 1991 PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST $ 93,500 $ 59,500 $ 255,000 $ 76,500 $ 127,500 $ 130,240 $ 272,800 $ 30,800 S 88,000 $1,438,840 $ 100,000 $ 87,550 50,000 $1,676,390 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1992 ESTIMATED ROAD LENGTH COST Vail Valley Drive 7,800 L.F. $ 286,650 Eagle°s Nest Circle 200 L.F. $ 14,000 Homestake Circle 400 L.F. $ 28,000 Fairway Drive 800 L.F. $ 56,000 Fairway Court 200 L.F. $ 14,000 Hornsilver Circle. 550 L.F. $ 38,500 Cabin Circle 250 L.F. $ 17,500 Ptarmigan Road 1 800 L.F. $ 126,000 Spring Hill Lane 450 L.F. $ 31,500 Sunburst Drive 2,850 L.F. $ 142,500 Alta Circle 200 L.F. $ 20,000 West Gore Creek Drive 2,500 L.F. $ 162,500 Matterhorn Circle 750 L.F. $ 63 750 (to Geneva Drive) , Shasta Place 300 L.F. $ 25,500 TOTAL 19,050 L.F. $1,026,400 MAINTENANCE PAVING $ 100,000 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND $ 103,960 TESTING - 1992 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING - 1993 $ 50,000 TOTAL - 1992 PROGRAM $1,280,360 e 0 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1993 ROAD Bridge Road Lupine Drive Bighorn Road Willow Way Nugget Lane Columbine Drive Spruce Way Spruce Drive Streamside Circle Meadow Drive Juniper Lane TOTAL MAINTENANCE PAVING ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND TESTING - 1993 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING - 1994 TOTAL - 1993 PROGRAM ESTIMATED LENGTH COST 550 L.F. $ 27,500 2,600 L.F. $ 130,000 10,750 L.F. $ 537,500 350 L.F. $ 17,500 800 L.F. $ 40,000 2,250 L.F. (Total) $ 112,500 2,250 L.F. $ 112,500 150 L.F. $ 7,500 2,300 L.F. $ 115,000 4,400 L.F. $ 220,000 1,500 L.F. $ 80,000 27,900 L.F. $1,400,000 $ 200,000 $ 160,000 $ 50,000 $1,810,000 ti STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1994 ESTIMATED ROAD LENGTH COST Meadow Lane 1,000 L.F. $ 50,000 Gore Circle 1,300 L.F. $ 65,000 Main Gore Drive 5,100 L.F. $ 255,000 Kel-Gar Lane 550 L.F. $ 27,500 Black Gore Drive 2,200 L.F. $ 110,000 Grouse Lane 550 L.F. $ 27,500 Ute Lane 250 L.F. $ 12,500 Snowshoe Lane 500 L.F. $ 25,000 Matterhorn Circle 2,820 L.F. $ 282,000 Lionsridge Loop 6,000 L.F. $ 380,500 Buffehr Creek Road 2,800 L.F. $ 246,400 Circle Drive 770 L.F. $ 67,760 Meadow Ridge Road 830 L.F. $ 73,040 TOTAL 24,670 L.F. $1,622,200 MAINTENANCE PAVING $ 200,000 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND $ 135,000 TESTING - 1994 TOTAL - 1994 PROGRAM $1,957,200 TG «V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMFROVEMEfvT FROJEC•t' DEPART!•!E'~T I DIVISION I PROJECT TITLE: Street Light Improvement Pro ram g PROJECT STAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~~.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & 1• TI\G DATE: PROJECT C0~IPLETION DATE: 1994 POST 199 • IiPROVE*IENTS 30 000 30,00 30,00 30,000 30,000 BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT I DEVELOPMENTS & II`iPROVE"DrNTS TOTAL ~ 30 000 130, 00 30, 000 30, 000 s0, o00 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 19 0 •1991 .1992 1993 19.94 TOTAL •NEW PERSON~'EL NEEDED PTE) - PRIORITY RATINGS AI'IONG ALL PERSONNEL COSTS - llEPARTMENT OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S PROJECTS ONLY CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL I I 1 IS nfnr.i~ ~ . , FUTURE REVENUE FRO*1 PROJECT) ( ( I I I Ol1N PROJECTS CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION Continues current five year improvement program. ~ SliB~lITTED BY: - DATE ,,, 1989 STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - Antlers Bus Turnaround (1 L.H.) - West Gore Creek Drive - Placid Drive bus stop (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Meadow DRive and Juniper Lane (1 T.C.) - Lupine Drive Bridge (1 T.C.) - Vail Valley Medical Center (2 T.C.) - Chamonix Lane - Buffehr Creek bus stop (1 T.C.) + Ten street lights in conjunction with Sandstone Road Improvements - Vail Valley Drive (Amphitheater Entrance) (2 T.C.) 1990 - Town Shops Walkways (2 T.C.) - North of Bell Tower Building (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Lupine Drive and Columbine Drive (1 T.C.) - Bridge Road bridge (1 T.C.) - Pirate Ship Park (3 R.) + Eight street lights in conjunction with Intermountain Road Improvements - Mill Creek Circle - Vail Valley Drive (1 T.C.) 1991 - Booth Creek Park (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Streamside Circle and Meadow Drive (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Spruce Way and Columbine Drive (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Aspen Lane and Booth Creek Drive (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Westhaven Circle and Greenhill Court (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Vail View Drive and Sandstone Drive (1 T.C.) - Intersection of Lionsridge Loop and Buffehr Creek Road (1 T.C.) + Eight street lights in conjunction with Booth Falls Road Improvements 1992 - East Meadow Drive (across from Sonnenalp) (2 R) - Bighorn Road (3 T.C.) - Founder°s Plaza (1 R) - East Meadow Drive (across from Mountain Haus) (2 R) + Eight street lights in conjunction with East Vail Street Improvements 1993 Locations to be determined LEGEND R - Village Core Classic Street Light TC - Town and Country Street Light TOI~V Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL II~PROVE:MENT FROJE:C~1' DEPARTI•lE'~T I DIVISION I Police PROJECT TITLE: Communications system maintenance and replacement PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`1PLETION DATE: Continues program of hand-held radios replacement. FU\'D 1i AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.992 119 11994 POST 199 PL.M'NING/DESIGN LArD AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*fENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IPiPROVE*~NTS 15 , 000 15 , 000 15 , 000 15 , 000 15 , 000 TOTAL ( 15,000 15,000 15,000115,000 15,000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1990 '1991 .1992 1993 19.94 TOTAL .NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) PRIORITY RATINGS r1P10NG ALL PERSONNEL COSTS llEPARTI`IENT OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S PROJECTS ONLY CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT I ~'lO1~G ALL OLIN PROJECTS CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION • ~ SUByITTED BY DATE: e TG ~~l OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMFROV • EMENT FR0JEC~1' DEPART"IE'~T i DIVISION I PROJECT TITLE: Miscellaneous Building Maintenance PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1992 19 1 PLANNING/DESIG\' 1994 POST 1994 TOTAL LAND ACQUISITION SITE, L`4NDSCAPING ~ S_ STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*1ENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLAINT DEVELOPI•IENTS & II`iPROVE*~NTS 90, 000 90, 000 90, 000 90, 000 TOTAL 90 000 90,000 90,OOOI 90,000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1 90 • ' NEW PERSON\'EL NEEDED (PTE) 1991 .1992 1993 19.94 TOTAL PRIORITY ALL PERSONNEL COSTS - RATINGS AP10NG llEPARTI`IENT OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S PROJECTS ONLY CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO"t PROJECT CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION Continues program of repairing and upgrading the mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, and drainage systems for Town buildings. Includes an annual contingency for unforeseen items. • ~ SUBMITTED BY : ALL PROJECTS TE: h . TG~wy OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVEMEfVT FROJEC~T DEPART`lE?~T I DIVISION I Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Bus Replacement PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Replaces all Town buses between 1990 and 1995. (See attached schedule.) FUND /~ AND TITLE: ++~~~/Ll.l ~,vJ1J 1990 1991 1..9.92 I 19 3 I 19.9_.4_ ~ POST 199 PLA.'v'NING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING S_STREET . DEVELOPMENTS & II•IPROVE*fENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLAINT DEVELOPMENTS & Ii`1PROVE'~'ENTS 465,00 696,00 513,000897,0001,125,O~J0 TOT.4I. ~ 465,OOd696,000~513,OOt~897,0001,125,000 PROJECT FUNDING I I TOTAL, FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1 NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES ~ SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECT 1 CO"^'IENTS AND JUSTIFICATION Includes estimated 5~ inflation per year. ~ SL'B`1ITTED BY 92 ~ 1993 I 1.9.94 ~ TOTAL pRIORITY RATINGS AI`lOIQG ~ _ DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY, P10NG ALL OWN PROJECTS DATE: R t BtISCAP TC)WN C>F VAIL Bus Replacement Schedule ITEM 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replace 3 1979 Buses 465,000 Replace 4 1979 Buses Replace 1983 Mini Bus Replace 3 1979 Buses Replace 5 1981 Buses Replace 5 1981 Buses Replace 1 1982 Bus Replace 5 1981 Buses 651,000 45,000 513,000 897,000 938,000 187,000 98s,noo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL BUS COSTS 465,000 696,OC10 513,C1C1C1 897,000 1,125,000 989,000 .' TG ti~ OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL II~PROVE,MEltiT FROJEC~1' DEPARTr1E'~T i _DIVISION I Public Works/Traps ortation~- PROJECT TITLE: Recreational Paths Maintenance Program pROJECT STARTING DATE• PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: FUtiD 4i AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 PL.A.~v'NING /DES IG\' LAA'D AC UISITION SITE, L`a'NDSCAPING ~ S. STREET DEVELOPr1Er1TS & IPIPROVE*lENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPI.IENTS ~ IDiPROVE"'ENTS 77 _ inn TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL I FUTURE OPERATING COSTS NEW PERSON\'EL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS FUTURE REVENUE FRO"1 PROJECT oNG ALL lJN PROJECTS CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 1 I Continues current five year improvement and maintenance program. (See attached list.) • ~ SUByITTED gy; 199 81,000~85,000~93,000 81,000~85,000~93,000 199.4 POST 1994 TO 1991 .1992 1993 19.94. TOTAL pRIORIT RATINGS AI~10NC DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY D,1TE ° ti . .: .~ 1990 - 1994 BIKE PATH MAINTENANCE PLAN ITEM 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 PATCHING 18,300 22,300 26,300 30,300 34,300 OVERLAY 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 SIGNAGE 5,000 . 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 ROCK REMOVAL 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 VEGETATION CONTROL 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 CRACK SEALING 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 DRAINAGE IMPROVEe 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 SWEEPING 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 FILL AREAS 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 BARRICADES 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 REFLECTORS 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 ROCKFALL 1, 000 1, 000 1, 000 1, 000 1,000 STRUCTURAL IMPROVEo 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 TOTAL/YEAR 77,000 81,000 85,000 89,000 93,000 6 `' TGI~V Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMFROVE:MENT FROJEC~f DEPARTr1E'vT I DIVISION I Public Works/Traps ortation ~- PROJECT TITLE: Parking Structures Capital Asset Maintenance Program PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~IPLETION DATE: a, FUND ~r AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 PL.42v'NING/DESIGN LAND AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*fENTS 30,000 BUILDING, STRUCTURE b PLANT DEVELOPI•IENTS & Ir1PROVE'~~NTS 199 ,00 080,000 60,000 75,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT 000 160,000 ~Z75,000I 91 _1992 1993 19.94 'TOTAL PRIORITY RATINGS AAIONC . llEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY r1oNG ALL OhIN PROJECTS CO•"~IENTS AND JUSTIFICATION This five year plan assumes that the remodel of terminal building, retrofit of traffic channelization, loading zones, and elevators, and other projects are included in the expansion plans for the Village structure. SUBMITTED By• . D,1TE a a PARKING STRUCTURES CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 1990 Concrete Milling Machine .30,000 1991 Retrofit Curb, Gutter, Drainage LionsHead Information Booth 30,000 $ 30,000 1992 Replace Expansion Joints (LTRC) 60,000 Replace Light Fixtures (LTRC) 20,000 $ 80,000 1993 Replace Boiler (VTRC) 60,000 $ 60,000 ~ n n n Retrofit all concrete surfaces LTRC) 275,000 $275,000 ~. ,~' TG~~N OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL I~1PROVEMEfVT FROJEC~1' DEPARTME'N'T I DIVISION I Public Works/Transportation PROJECT TITLE: Town Shops Maintenance and PROJECT STARTING DATE: Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`1PLETION DATE: FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.9,92 I 19 I 199.4 POST 199 4 TO PL.A.'N'NING/DESIGN LAND AC UISITION SITE, LAIVDSCAF'ING ~ S. STREET . DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*IENTS 110,000 20,000150,000 35,000 125,00 BUILDING, STRUCTURE b PLAINT I DEVELOPI•iENTS & IPIPROVE*~NTS TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL .FUTURE OPERATING COSTS NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES ~ SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT CO*?IENTS AND JUSTIFICATION (See Attached List) SUBMITTED BY: 10,0001120,000~150,000~35,000~125,00 2 1993 -19.94 TOTAL pRIORITY RATINGS AI'SOIJG llEPARTi`1ENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS Continues current five year improvement program. D,1T E .~ TOWN SHOPS CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 1990 Relocate cinder bin and provide access to proposed snow dump (west end of shop property) 65,000 Auto body and paint shop equipment 45,000 $110,000 1991 Overlay and rebuild roads in entire shops complex (6 inches asphalt) 120,000 $120,000 1992 Enlarge Administration Building (1,500 sq. ft. - Storage, Locker Space, Office for Construction Inspector/Drafter) 150,000 $150,000 1993 Install fire sprinkling system (shops) 95,000 Construct additional storage facility (1,250 sq. ft.) 110,000 Install retaining wall - shops tunnel 30.000 $235,000 1994 Retrofit building exteriors, plumbing HVAC and electrical 125,000 $125,000 TG «V Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJEC•T DEPARTPfE'~T I Library _DIVISION I PROJECT TITLE: Library Children's Area Remodel PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~IPLETION DATE: Includes construction of a wall, upgrade of lighting, entry way enhancements, and possible mechanical iterations. FUND /r' AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1992 ~ 199'1 I 1994 I POST 1 qQ ~ T~ PL.A.ti'NING/DESIGN LAA'D ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING•S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS ~ IMPROVE*IENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE ~ PLAINT DEVELOPI.IENTS & IT•fPROVE*~NTS TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL • FUTURE OPERATING COSTS • NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO*1 PROJ CO*~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ByITTED BY: 0 i yyU • 1991 .1992 1993 19.94. ~ TOTAL PRIORITY RATINGS AI'10NG _ llEPARTPIENT PROJECTS ONLY S ~P10I~G ALL O~JN PROJECTS DATE: TGtivN Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVE;f~1ENT FROJEC~T DEPART~IE'~T I DIVISION I Public Works/Transportatia~---_ PROJECT TITLE: Bus Interior Refurbishment Program PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Refurbish interiors of existing transit buses. Re-upholster all seats, install new rubber floor coverings, replace damaged moldings and panels. FUND fir` AND TITLE: .. PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.992 I 19 I PL.42r'NING/DESIG\T 1994 POST 1994 TOTAL LAA'D AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S_STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*1ENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPt•IENTS & Ir1PROVE*~NTS 26,000 TOTAL 26,000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS • 19 0 '1991 .1992 1993 19 94 TOTAL NEW PERSONNTEL NEEDED PTE) . ' PRIORITY ALL PERSONNEL COSTS RATINGS AAtONC llEPARTMENT OPERATING SERVICES S SUPPLI S PROJECTS ONLY CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECTI ALL PROJECTS ~~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION Continues current three-year program. Eight buses a year at $3,000 per bus. SUBMITTED By; DATE: TG «V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJEC~T' DEPART"IENT I Administrative Services, _DIVISION I Police, Com. Dev., Munic. Court- Manager's Office, Town Council PROJECT TITLE: Building Fmprovements to Post Office PROJECT STARTING DATE:4/89 and Municipal Building PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`LF'LETION DATE:10/89 Municipal Building and Post Office sites. FUND (; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 199 PL.AIvTNING/DESIGN 3~ 15,000 LAND AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~b.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*1ENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPI•IENTS ~ II`1PROVE"U/NTS 475,00 (includes furnishings) I~_ 3_` (___199.4 POST 1 TOTAL 1490,00 PROJECT FUNDING Capital Projects 490 00 TOTAL 490,00 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1990 •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS 6 00 OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES 6,OOi CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL ~ 12,00 FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECTI 1992 199319.94 'TOTAL PRIORITY RATINGS AI'IONC . llEPARTDIENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS ~::r1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION Expansion of Community Development,. Data Processing (Computing and printing office, storage) Auditors space, Police, Administration, storage facilities. Relocation of Municipal Court and Council Chambers. SUByITTED By; DATE: TGI~y OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVEMEfvT FROJEC~f DEPARTDSE'~T I DIVISION I Public Works/Transportatia PROJECT TITLE: Overlay Municipal Building Parking Lots PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ar1D LOCATION I PROJECT C0;`1PLETION DATE: FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1 992 PLA.~TING/DESIGN . I 19 I 1994 POST 1994 TOT_4L LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S,STREET . DEVELOPMEr1TS & IMPROVE*1ENTS 45,000 BUILDING, STRUCTURE ~ PLANT DEVELOPAiENTS & ITIPROVE*~NTS TOTAL 45,000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS • 1990 '1991 NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) .1992 199319.94 TOTAL PRIORITY ALL PERSONNEL COSTS RATINGS AA10NC _ llEPARTMENT OPERATING S'cRVICES S SUPPLI S PROJECTS ONLY CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO*1 PROJECTI CO"~SENTS AND JUSTIFICATION C1VIY(; Aj,j, O~,N PROJECTS `1ITTED gy DATE: ---_ G~~y Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJEC~f DEPARTDSE'~T I DIVI_ S_ IO~_I Fire - PROJECT TITLE: Furniture Replacement PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~IPLETION DATE: Station 1 and Station 2: Replace old carpet and old furniture FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1 PL.4h'NING/DESIGN LAND AC UISITION SZTE, LANDSCAPING ~ S. STREET . DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPI•IENTS & IPSPROVE"ANTS 20 , 000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES ~ SUPPLI CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO: PROJECT CO*~iE;~Tg AND JUSTIFICATION than early 1990. .Furniture willrlaststhroughe19891butdnot longebut Someater furniture we are using was second hand. UB`1ITTED BY : 20,000 T~ 992 1993 19.94. TOTAL pRIORITY ' RATINGS AASONG . U E PARTI•lEN T PROJECTS ONLY D,~TE G ALL PROJECTS TG~~y Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL I~1FROVEf~1ENT FROJEC~f DEPARTZ•SE'~T I DIVISION I Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Bus Shelter replacement and improvement program PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`1PLETION DATE: FUND ~r AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1992 I 19 I 1994 POST 199 4 T PLAIvT'ING/DESIGN LAA'D AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING S. STREET . DEVELOPMENTS & II•iPROVE*fENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPI`IENTS 6 II`iPROVE"'ENTS 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 TOTAL, PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO: PROJECTI 30,000~40,000~40,000~40,000~40,000 1992 1993 19.94 'TOTAL pRIORITY RATINGS AI'fONG DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS CO•"?LENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ,Existing she ers we e purc I Federal UMTA grant in 1980. They are in need of replacement and we receive numerou requests for additional shelters. SUB`tITTED By ; DATE: TG~~+N OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJEC~T I DEPART~~IE'~T I Community Development DIVISION I Planning PROJECT TITLE: West Meadow Drive Conceptual Design PROJECT STARTING DATE: 1989 Fall PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~1F'LETION DATE: 1990 Area - West Meadow Drive from intersection of Vail Road to Vail Library - Conceptual design for Pedestrian/Bike/Cars/Emergency Vehicle circulation, drainage, landscaping, seating, lighting, signage, possible tive desi n solutions enerated. FUND ~; AND TITLE: .. PROJECT COSTS 1990 1 PLA.'~'NING/DESIGN 25, 000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IAi1'ROVE*1ENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE ~ PLANT DEVELOPI•IENTS & I1•fPROVE~~NTS Title Report TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING 2,000 27,000 TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS .NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (PTE ALL PERSONNEL COSTS I OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS 92 1993 { ~L9.94 iT07AL PRIORITY RATINGS APSONC DEPARTI•IENT PROJECTS ONLY TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FRO*1 PROJEC IJG ALL N PROJECTS CO"?IENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 1 { This project is needed for safety reasons as well as aesthetic reasons. It was called for in the Land Use Plan and was also deemed very important by the community throughout the hospital planning process. ~ SUB`fITTED By; DATE: TGti~V Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJEC~T DEPARTr1E'~T I DIVISION' I Public Works PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk Improvements , PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Construct approximately 1,000 linear feet o sidewalk in various areas within the Town in accordance with the Rec. trails plan, Vail Village Master Plan, Urban Design Guide Plan and special Council requests. FUND !; AND TITLE: 30 - RETT ' PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.992 119 11994 POST 1994 TOTAL PL.4.'v'NING/DESIGN LAND AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVE*IENTS 15 000 15 000 15,000 15,000 15,000 BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT I DEVELOPI`IENTS & II`fPROi'E*~NTS TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING S'aRVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECT CO"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~ SL'ByITTED BY : 15,00015,000 15,000 15,000 115,000 991 .1992 1993 19.94 TOTAL pRIORITY ' RATINGS rl1`lOIQG _ llEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY ALL PROJECTS DATE: TOti~V Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL Ih1PROVEMEfvT FROJEC~i' DEPART~,fE'~T I DIVISION I Community Development PROJECT TITLE: Recreation Trail Construction PROJECT STARTING DATE• PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT C0~IPLETION DATE: decided upon at this time. CouncilNinputrwillobelsolicitedr 1990 has been FUND ~; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS '1990 1991 1.992 119 11994 PLANNING/DESIGN ~-" LAND AC UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING &_ STREET DEVELOPMENTS & II`1PROVE*IENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & II`iPROVE*~NTS 168,000 00,000 00,000 30,000 250,00 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING S'cRVICES b SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECT TS AND JUSTIFICATION SL'B`iITTED BY 68~000b00,000I300,000~30,000~250,00 DATE: T. 1992 1993 ~i9.94 TOTAL pRIORITY RATINGS AI'IONG _ llEPARTAIENT PROJECTS ONLY 1•IOIJG ALL 011N PROJECTS TG~~+N Or VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL IMPROVEMENT FROJE:C~I' DEPARTI•IE'~T I DIVISION I Community Development ------ Planning PROJECT TITLE: Landscape Improvements PROJECT STARTING DATE•5/90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COi`1PLETION DATE: 8/90 Continued implementation of landscape improvement plan. FUND 1; AND TITLE: PROJECT COSTS 1990 199 PL.4Ir'NING/DESIGN 8,00 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING~S.STREET DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVE*fENTS 92,00 BUILDING, STRUCTURE b PLANT I DEVELOPI•IENTS b I1•fPROVE*'ENTS TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING 99.4 POST 1 100 , 00~ 100 , 00(~ 100 , OOC~l 00 , OOOIl 00 , 000 TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1990 •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) Increa ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS FUTURE REVENUE FRO"1 PROJECT ALL PROJECTS CO•"~1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 1 as prioritized by council. Willtentaillcompletionlof EastaVailainterphovement p an and'Phase I of Main Vail interchange. ange ~ SL'B`1ITTED BY ; .991 .1992 1993 19.94 'TOTAL PRIORITY Mai tenanc RATINGS A1'10NC llEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY DATE: 7/25/89 TGti~V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROV~:MENT FROJE:C~T DEPART~~SE?~T I DIVISION I Community Development -- planning PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT STARTING DATE• Ford Park Lower Bench /90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 7/90 Volleyball court, horseshoe pits, picnic tables by creek, drainage, path additions from playground connecting to upper bench. FUND ~; AND TITLE: rnwGl,t ~u~rs ~ 1990 1991 1,992 ~ 19 3 ~ 1 PLA.'~'TING/DESIG\' 1,000 99.4 POST 1994 ~' . O T_~L. LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING &_STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IPIPROVE>•1ENTS 31 000 BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLAINT DEVELOPI`iENTS & ItiPROVE"ANTS TOTAL PRO 3 2, 000 JECT FUNDING RETT TOTAL FUTUR E OPERATING COSTS 1990 1991 -1992 1993 19.94 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSON\'EL NEEDED (PTE) RATINGS Ar10NG ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERA _ DEPARTMENT PROJECTS ONLY TING SERVICES ~ SUPPLIE CAPITAL. OUTLAYS S TOTAL, FUTURE REVENUE FR0~1 PROJECT 1`IONG ALL OhN PROJECTS CO•"~'1ENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~ These improvements finish the last 2~ of the Ford Park Lower Bench. This request was made by a council member on behalf of many community members who requested these improvements. SUByITTED BY: Kri~rg~ g~~,a DATE: TGti~V OF VA IL - PROPOSED CAP ITAL I~IPR0VE:MEfvT FROJEC~f DEPARTi`IENT I DIVISION 1 Communit Develo ment Planning ' PROJECT TITLE: Donovan Park Phase I Fall PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT C0~1F'LETION DATE; Fall PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION I General site improvements, parking area, lighting, irrigation, informal softball field, picnic shelter, picnic tables, landscaping, construction documents, bid package included as well as some FUN r` AN TITLE: .. PROJECT COSTS 1990 1991 1.992 I 19 I 1994 POST 1994 TOT.4I. PLA.N'NING /DESIGN 45 , 000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, L`ANDSCAPING~b. STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IPfPROVE"ANTS 510,000 TOT.~I, 1550, 000 PROJECT FUNDING RETT ~ 550,000 TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1 •NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED PTE) I ALL PERSONNEL COSTS OPERATING SERVICES ~ SUPPLI S CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT 990 '1991 .1992 1993 19.94 tTOTAL PRIORITY ncre sed Ma ntenan e ~ RATINGS AI'SONG _ DEPARTI`lENT PROJECTS ONLY Elec ric/wa er cos s UI~G ALL lJN PROJECTS '~s1EtvTS AND JUSTIFICATION Community has requested Donovan Park improvements be initiated for several years. This project is proposed in response to this community input. ~ SUB`1ITTED BY: Kri cr~n p ~i?a D,1TE: 9