HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-10-17 Support Documentation Town Council Regular SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1989
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1989, first reading, an annual appropriation
ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations
to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
for its fiscal year January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990, and
providing for the levy assessment and collection of Town ad valorem
property taxes due for the 1989 tax year and payable in the 1990 fiscal
year.
2. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance amending
Section 8 of Ordinance No. 14 Series of 1987 to provide for the amendment
of density of the approved development plan for Special Development
District No. 6.
3. Resolution No. 61, Series of 1989, a resolution endorsing and supporting My
Choice ... Drug Free Colorado Red Ribbon Campaign.
4. Appeal of Design Review Board Decision Denying a Sign for Nick's, 228
Bridge Street
5. Appointment of Five Regular Municipal Election Judges for November 21, 1989
Election
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
6. Adjournment
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1989
7:30 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 1. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1989, first reading, approving
Steve Barwick the budget
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 23, Series of 1989, on first reading.
Background Rationale: This_is the annual budget
authorization and appropriation ordinance for fiscal year
1990.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 23, Series of
1989, on first reading.
7:50 2. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, first reading, amending
Peter Patten Special Development District No. 6
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 24, Series of 1989, on first reading.
Background Rationale: The applicant is owner of a
commercial condominium space. He wishes to convert this
space (currently Goods retail store) into a residential
condominium. In order to convert this space 4,287 square
feet of GRFA must be added to the existing maximum of
120,600 square feet, as outline in Special Development
District No. 6.
Staff Recommendation: Approve, with conditions, Ordinance
No. 24, Series of 1989, on first reading (see enclosed
memo).
8:10 3. Resolution No. 61, Series of 1989, endorsing and supporting
Charlie Wick My Choice ... Drug Free Colorado Red Ribbon Campaign
Ron Phillips
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Resolution
No. 61, Series of 1989.
Background Rationale: The national Red Ribbon Campaign
originated when a federal agent was murdered by drug
traffickers in 1985. The Red Ribbon has become the national
symbol to reduce the demand for drugs. The National
Federation of Parents for Drug Free Youth has assumed the
leadership role nationally, and the Communities for a Drug
Free Eagle Valley locally, in the organization of the Red
Ribbon Campaign.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 61, Series of
1989.
8:20 4. Appeal of Design Review Board decision denying a sign for
Kristan Pritz Nick's, 228 Bridge Street (Applicant: Michael Staughton)
Action Requested of Council: Review the DRB decision and
either overturn or uphold the DRB vote.
Background Rationale: On September 6th, the DRB voted 2-2
on Nick's sign. A tie vote is a denial. The sign is 3
square feet. Nick's is written in a red/pink neon. The
neon letters are encased in a plexiglass box. The sign is
mounted on the wall above the stair leading down to Nick's.
8:50 5. Appointment of five Regular Municipal Election Judges for
Pam Brandmeyer 11/21/89 election
Action Requested of Council: To approve.
Background Rationale: According to the Colorado Municipal
Election Code, 31-10-401, election judges must be appointed
by the governing body at least 15 days prior to the
election.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the five proposed judges.
8:55 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
9:15 6. Adjournment
-2-
ORDINANCE NO. 23
Series of 1989
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE: ADOPTING A BUDGET
AND FINANCIAL PLAN AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS TO PAY
THE COSTS, EXPENSES, AND LIABILITIES OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, FOR ITS FISCAL YEAR JANUARY 1, 1990
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1990, AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY
ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF TOWN AD VALOREM PROPERTY
TAXES DUE FOR THE 1989 TAX YEAR AND PAYABLE IN THE
1990 FISCAL YEAR.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Article IX of the Charter of the Town
of Vail, Colorado, the Town Manager prepared and submitted to the Town
Council a proposed long-range capital program for the Town and a proposed
budget and financial plan for all Town funds and activities for the 1990
fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the proposed Town budget and
capital program was published on the 6th day of October, 1989, more than
seven days prior to the hearing held on the 17th day of October, 1989
pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Charter; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Town Council to adopt a budget
and financial plan for the 1990 fiscal year, to make appropriations for the
amounts specified in the budget, and to provide for the levy, assessment
and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1989 year and
payable in the 1990 fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of
Vail, Colorado, that:
1. The procedures prescribed in Article IX of the Charter of the
Town of Vail, Colorado, for the enactment hereof have been fulfilled.
2. Pursuant to Article IX of the Charter, the Town Council
hereby makes the following annual appropriations for the Town of Vail,
Colorado, for its fiscal year beginning on the first day of January, 1990,
and ending on the 31st day of December, 1990°
FUND AMOUNT
General Fund $11,406,806
Capital Projects Fund 6,449,020
Conservation Trust Fund 7,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax 2,139,721
Heavy Equipment Fund 1,436,529
Debt Service Fund 3,506,058
Special Parking Assessment Fund 275,000
Health Insurance Fund 630,000
Lionshead Mall Assessment District 158,026
West Vail Assessment District 8,800
Vail Marketing Fund 571,000
Total: 26,587,960
Less Interfund Transfers: <6,178,258>
Total Budget $20,409,702
-1-
3. The Town Council hereby adopts the full and complete Budget
and Financial Plan for the 1990 fiscal year for the Town of Vail, Colorado,
which are incorporated by reference herein and made part hereof, and copies
of said public records shall be made available to the public in the
Municipal Building of the Town.
4. For the purpose of defraying part of the operating and
capital expenses of the Town of Vail, Colorado during its 1989 .fiscal year,
the Town Council hereby levies a property tax of 6.693 mills upon each
dollar of the total assessed valuation of $272,300,370 for the 1989 tax
year of all taxable property within the Town, which will result in a gross
tax levy of $1,822,432 said assessment shall be duly made by the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado, and directs Revised Statutes (1873 as amended)
and as otherwise required by law.
5. This Ordinance shall take effect five days after publication
following the final passage hereof.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IN FULL THIS day of , 1990, and a public hearing
on this Ordinance shall be held at a regular meeting for the Town Council
of the Town of Vail, Colorado on the day of
1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building,
Vail, Colorado.
ATTEST:
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED
this day of
1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 17, 1989
SUBJECT: A request to amend Special Development District No. 6 in
order to amend the total gross residential floor area that is
to permitted to be constructed within the district
Applicant: BSC of Vail, Colorado, Inc.
I. BACKGROUND OF REQUEST
The applicant, BSC of Vail, Colorado, is requesting an amendment
to Special Development District No. 6, the Vail Village Inn in
order to amend the total gross residential floor area that is
permitted to be constructed in the district. SDD No. 6 currently
allows a total GRFA of 120,&00 square feet, all of which is either
constructed or proposed to be constructed within future phases of
development. The applicant is the owner of the Goods retail
condominium space and wishes to convert that space into a
residential unit. The existing square footage of the Goods retail
space is 3,927 square feet. Because of the existing configuration
of the retail space and the opportunity to infill some loft areas,
the applicant is requesting the total additional square footage of
4,900 square feet to change the allowance of SDD No. 6 from
120,600 to 125,500 square feet.
II. STAFF.RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation for this request is for approval with the
following condition:
1. If this unit be use restricted, according to Section
17.26.075 of the Town of Vail Subdivision Regulations.
The Planning and Environmental Commission voted 3-4 to deny a
motion for approval with the condition that only 50% of the unit
be restricted. The Commission then voted 4°-3 to deny the request
as proposed. In further discussion with the Planning Commission,
the concensus seem to indicate that although, they did not object
to the residential. .use of this space, they felt that a 5,000
square foot unit was not a viable short term rental~unat and that
this. space should be activly utilized in the short. term rental
market. A suggestion to the applicant was to divide the space
into several smaller condominiumsthat may be more appropriate for
the rental market.
A ,~
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: September 26, 1989
SUBJECT> A request to amend Special Development District No. 6 in
order to amend the total gross residential floor area that is
permitted to be constructed within the district.
Applicant: BSC of Vail, Colorado, Incorporated
I. PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST
The applicant, BSC of Vail, Colorado, requests an amendment to
Special Development District No. 6 in order to amend the total
gross residential floor area that is permitted to be constructed
in the district. SDD No. 6 currently allows the total GRFA of
120,600 square feet to be constructed within the district, all of
which is either constructed or proposed to be constructed within
future phases of the development.
The applicant's request in this amendment is to allow an
additional 5,714 square feet of GRFA to be added to SDD No. 6.
This amendment would allow the applicant to convert existing
commercial space, which is primarily second and third floor, to
residential use. The applicant's reason for the request is the
questionable viability of second and third floor retail space.
The subject space referred to is unit #30 of the Vail Village
Plaza Condominiums. Unit #30 is comprised of two units previously
numbered 30 and 32 and now combined into one unit. These units
were previously designated within the condominium declaration as
office or commercial use and the space is currently occupied by
the Goods Retail Clothing Store. The owners of this space have
received the necessary approvals from the other owners within the
building to amend the declaration in order to allow the use of the
space for dwelling and lodging purposes.
If this proposed amendment is approved, the total GRFA permitted
within SDD No. 6 would be 126,314 square feet. This proposal does
not change the existing requirement that a minimum of 148
accommodation units and 67,367 square feet of GRFA be devoted to
accommodation units in Phase IV and Phase V of SDD No. 6.
The 5,417 square feet that is being requested includes the
existing square footage of condominium unit #30, as well as an
allowance for square footage that could potentially be added in
the condominium unit X30 space, without changing the exterior of
the building. This space could be added by building lofts and
infilling areas that are open to a two story space.
II. COMPARISON OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE UNDERLYING ZONE DISTRICT
For Special Development District No. 6, the Public Accommodation
District is the underlying zone district. Public Accommodation zoning
would allow approximately 120,000 square feet of GRFA on this site.
r ~
III. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGN CRITERIA
It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that
submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with
each of the following standards or to demonstrate that one or more
of them are not applicable or that a practical solution consistent
with the public interest has been achieved.
A. DESIGN COMPATIBILITY AND SENSITIVITY TO THE IMMEDIATE
ENVIRONMENT, NEIGHBORHOOD AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES RELATIVE TO
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, SCALE, BULK, BUILDING HEIGHT, BUFFER
ZONES, IDENTITY, CHARACTER, VISUAL INTEGRITY AND
ORIENTATION.
There are very limited design issues related to this
proposal. By changing the use of the existing Goods retail
store to residential, there is virtually no elimination of
first floor retail space. The staircase that accesses this
space does contain a display window. The applicant has
proposed to maintain this display window and allow it to be
used by the adjacent retail space, now occupied by Vail
Village Inn Sports. Although the entry may be changed as
part of a future proposal to remodel the condominium space,
it is assumed that any design issues can be reviewed and
dealt with by the Design Review Board regarding changes to
the street level.
If this conversion were
proposed but unbuilt in
would be a minor design
Exactly what that impac
positive or negative is
proposal.
to utilize some of the GRFA that is
SDD No. 6, it is possible that there
impact on those future phases.
t would be and whether it would be
impossible to determine through this
B. USES, ACTIVITY AND DENSITY WHICH PROVIDE A COMPATIBLE,
EFFICIENT AND WORKABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH SURROUNDING USES AND
ACTIVITY.
SDD No. 6 provides a mix of uses which is efficient and
workable with the surrounding area. SDD No. 6 contains
retail stores, restaurants, condominium units, as well as
short term accommodation units. It is a goal of the
Department of Community Development and is stated in the Land
Use Plan as well as the Vail Village Master Plan, that one
way to strengthen and continue the existing Village Core is
to encourage both high quality retail and a short term bed
base. While we are somewhat disappointed to see this retail
space eliminated, we understand the difficulties in
supporting second and third floor retail within this part of
the Village. We do feel that the proposed dwelling unit
should be utilized primarily for tourist-oriented
accommodations and, thus, should be restricted according to
Section 17.26.075 of the Town of Vail Subdivision
Regulations.
,~ A
C. COMPLIANCE WITH PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED
IN SECTION 18.52.
Parking and loading standards for residential use are
significantly lower than for a retail store of this size.
Parking for this retail space has been accommodated within
the parking requirements for SDD No.6 and the staff sees no
problem with the parking and loading requirements with the
respect to this application.
D. CONFORMITY WITH APPLICABLE ELEMENTS OF THE VAIL COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN, TOWN POLICIES AND URBAN DESIGN PLANS.
The following sections of the Town of Vail Land Use Plan
relate to this proposalo
Commercial
3.1 The hotel bed base should be preserved and used more
efficiently.
Village Core/Lionshead
4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so
long as the existing character of each area is preserved
through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan
and the Vail Village Master Plan.
E. IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATION OF NATURAL AND/OR GEOLOGIC
HAZARDS THAT AFFECT THE PROPERTY UPON WHICH THE SPECIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS PROPOSED.
No hazards are present or effect this property.
F. SITE PLAN, BUILDING DESIGN AND LOCATION, AND OPEN SPACE
PROVISIONS DESIGNED TO PRODUCE A FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
RESPONSIVE AND SENSITIVE TO NATURAL FEATURES, VEGETATION AND
OVERALL AESTHETIC QUALITY OF THE COMMUNITY.
The staff's opinion is that there is very little impact upon
this proposal. There is very little physical change that
would occur in a conversion of this space from retail to
residential.
G. A CIRCULATION SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR BOTH VEHICLES AND
PEDESTRIANS ADDRESSING ON AND OFF SITE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION.
The existing circulation system which accesses this
particular condominium unit will remain essentially the same,
although it is possible that a remodel may occur and will
give this area a more residential feel. We believe any
issues that may be raised by this future remodel may be
addressed by the Design Review Board.
._
H. FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE IN ORDER
TO OPTIMIZE AND IMPROVE NATURAL FEATURES, RECREATION, VIEWS
AND FUNCTIONS.
There is no landscaping or open space proposed for this
development, nor does the staff feel that is appropriate to
request any.
I. PHASING PLAN OR SUBDIVISION PLAN THAT WILL MAINTAIN A
WORKABLE, FUNCTIONAL AND EFFICIENT RELATIONSHIP THROUGHOUT
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
We do not feel that this criteria is applicable to this
application.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
The staff has waived the requirement for an environmental impact
report on this proposal.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation for this request is for approval with the
following two conditions:
1. That Special Development District No. 6 be amended by adding
a total of 3,927 square feet to the existing allowance of
120,600 square feet. The 3,927 square foot figure is the
existing square footage of condominium unit #30. The staff
feels that the existing square footage is sufficient for a
successful conversion from retail to residential and that the
request for an additional 1,787 square feet which may be
added to unit #30 in the future, is extraneous and above and
beyond what is required for this conversion.
2. That this unit be use restricted, according to Section
17.26.075 of the Town of Vail Subdivision Regulations.
,.
ORDINANCE NO. 24
Series of 1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 14 SERIES OF 1987 TO PROVIDE
FOR THE AMENDMENT OF DENSITY OF THE
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWSo
Section 1. Legeslative Intent
A. In 1976, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 7,
Series of 1976, establishing Special Development District No. 6 to
insure the unified and coordinated develpment of a critical site as a
whole and in a manner suitable for the area in which it was situated.
B, Special Development District No. 6 provided in Section 14
that the Town Council reserve the right to abrogate or modify Special
Development District No. 6 for good cause throught the enactment of an
ordinance in conformity with the zoning code of the Town of Vail.
C. In 1985, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 1,
Series of 1985 providing certain amendments to the development plan
for Special Development District No. 6.
D. In 1987, the Vail Town Council passed Ordinance No. 14,
Series of 1987 providing certain amendments to the development plan
for Special Development District No. 6.
E. Application has been made to the Town of Vail to modify and
amend Section 8 of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1987 which relates to
the allowed density of the development plan for Special Development
District No. 6.
F. The Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of
Vail has reviewed the changes.
G. The Vail Town Council considers that the amendments provide
a more unified and aesthetically pleasing development of a critical
site within the Town and such amendments are of benefit to the health,
safety, welfare of the inhabitants of the Town of Vail.
Section 2.
A. Section 18.50.130 Density is hereby amended to read as
followso
.,. ~ _~
The gross residential floor area (GRFA) of all districts in the
Special Development District shall not exceed 125,500 square feet.
There shall be a minimum of 148 accommodation units and 67,367 square
feet of GRFA devoted to accommodation units in Phase IV and Phase V of
Special Development District No. 6.
B. Section 11 of Ordinance 14, Series of 1987 is hereby amended
by the addition of subsection 9 which shall read as follows:
9. Condominium unit 30 of the Vail Village-Plaza Condominiums shall
be subject to the restrictions of Section 17.26.075 of the Town of
Vail Subdivision Regulations.
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare
of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 3.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the .Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this
ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be
declared invalid.
Section 4.
The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any
provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance
shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced
under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and re-
enacted. .The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any
provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless
expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of
1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this
ordinance on the day of 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this day of 1989.
ATTEST:
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this day of 1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
A RESOLUTION ENDORSING AND SUPPORTING MY CHOICE ...
DRUG FREE COLORADO RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN.
WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in this nation has reached
epidemic stages, and the 15-24 year old age group is dying at a faster
rate than any other age group; and
WHEREAS, it is imperative that visible, unified prevention education
efforts by community members be launched to reduce the demand for drugs;
and
WHEREAS, the Colorado Federation of Parents for Drug Free Youth and
Communities for a Drug Free Colorado are sponsoring the National Red
Ribbon Campaign offering citizens the opportunity to demonstrate their
commitment to drug free lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, the National Red Ribbon Campaign will be celebrated in every
community in America during "Red Ribbon Week," October 22-29, 1989; and
WHEREAS, President George Bush and Mrs. Barbara Bush are the National
Honorary Chairmen, and Governor Roy Romer and Mrs. Romer are the State
Honorary Chairmen to provide this community focus on a Drug Free America;
and
WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious
institutions, service organizations, youth, physicians, senior citizens,
military, sports teams, and individuals will demonstrate their commitment
to drug free, healthy lifestyles by wearing and displaying red ribbons
during this week-long campaign; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Vail further commits its resources to ensure the
success of the Red Ribbon Campaign.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL does hereby
support October 22-29, 1989, as Red Ribbon Week, and encourages its
citizens to participate in drug prevention education activities, making a
visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug free
community.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
1989.
ATTEST:
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
w
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: October 17, 1989
RE: Appeal of Design Review Board decision to deny a neon sign
for Nick's, 228 Bridge Street.
Applicant: Michael Staughton
On September 6, 1989, the applicant presented a sign proposal for
Nick's. The sign is 3 square feet. Nick's is written in red/pink neon
letters. The letters match Nick's logo. The sign is 3 square feet and
encased in a clear plexiglass box. The sign is proposed to be mounted
on the wall above the stairway leading down to Nick's entrance. The
existing canopy covering the stairway remains under this proposal.
The Design Review Board voted 2 in favor and 2 against the proposal.
Due to the tie vote, the request was denied. Below is a summary of the
Design Review Board's comments:
I. SUMMARY OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD'S COMMENTS
Jamie McCluskie:
The simplicity of the sign is appropriate. The sign does not draw
undue attention onto itself.
Peggy Osterfoss:
She appreciated the concern over neon in the Village. However,
her opinion is that neon is allowed under the sign code. The DRB
has also approved a neon sign for the Uptown Grill. She felt that
it was not a defensible position to say neon calls undue attention
to itself. She felt that the DRB must look at the design, size,
and location of the sign. She felt the graphics could be
clearer.
Pat Herrington:
Her opinion is that neon is not appropriate in the Village.
Ned Gwathmey:
He also agrees that neon is not appropriate in the Village. He
believes that natural materials should be used. in the Core. The
potential precedent of approving this sign is not in the best
interest of the Village. He thought the sign would draw undue
attention to itself. He thought natural materials are encouraged
in the Core through the sign code. His opinion was that if the
sign was carefully designed, it might be acceptable. However, the
utilitarian approach of this particular sign is not acceptable.
.~~ ~'
A motion for approval was made by Jamie McCluskie and seconded by Peggy
Osterfoss. The vote was 2-2 with Ned Gwathmey and Pat Herrington
voting against the proposal.
II. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES THAT RELATE TO THIS PROPOSAL
16.16.010 Harmonious with Town scale.
Sign location, configuration, design, materials and colors should
be harmonious with the majestic mountain setting and the Alpine
Village scale of the Town.
16.16.020 Not dominating.
The sign should not visually dominate the structure to which it
belongs, or call undue attention to itself.
16.16.030 Materials.
Sign materials should be predominantly natural, such as rough
cedar, pine, or other types of wood. Stained glass may also be
considered by the Design Review Board. Plastic or other materials
are discouraged.
16.16.040 Architectural harmony.
The sign and its supporting structure should be in harmony
architecturally with the surrounding structures.
16.16.050 Colors.
Natural colors (earth tones), grey and white should be favored and
bright colors should be used only for accent.
Attached to this memo is the section on prohibited signs. The staff
position is that neon is not prohibited through our sign code.
~ -
t
Chapter 16.26
PROHIBITED SIGNS
Sections:
16.26.010 The following signs shall not be permitted, erected or
maintained in the Town of Vail:
A. Signs with visible moving, revolving or rotating parts or
visible mechanical movement of any description or other apparent ~~~
visible movement achieved by electrical, electronic or mechanical means.
B. Signs with optical illusion of movement by means of a design
which presents a pattern capable of reversible perspective, giving the
illusion of motion or changing of copy.
C. Signs with lights or illuminations which flash, move, rotate,
scintillate, blink, flicker, vary in intensity, vary in color, or use
intermittent electrical pulsation.
D. Strings of light bulbs used in connection with commercial
premises for commerciai purposes, other than traditional holiday
decorations.
E. Signs which incorproate projected images, emit any sound which
is intended to attract attention, or involve the use of live animals.
F. Any sign (together with its supporting structure) now or
hereafter existing which, 90 days or more after the premises have been
vacated, advertises an activity, business, product or service no longer
produced or conducted upon the premises upon which such sign is located.
If the sign or sign structure is covered or the identifying symbols
or letters removed, an extension of time may be granted by the Sign
Code Administrator upon good cause for such extension being shown.
(This provision shall not apply to permanent signs accessory to businesses
which are open only on a seasonal basis, provided there is clear intent
to continue operation of the business.)
G. Signs not permanently affixed or attached to the ground or to
any structure except for window signs and temporary barriers utilized
for emergency purposes.
H. Any sign or sign structure which
(1) is structurally unsafe, or
(2) constitutes a hazard to safety or health by reason of
inadequate maintenance or dilapidation, or
(3) is not kept in good repair, or
(4) is capable of causing electrical shocks to persons
likely to come in contact with it.
256-A
_,; ~ :.
PROHIBITED SIGNS
I. Any sign or si n s
g tructure which
(1) is in violation of the provisions of Title 16 of
the Vail Municipal Code, or
(2) in any other way obstructs the view of, may be confused
with, or purports to be an official traffic sign, signal
or device or any other official sign, or
(3) uses any words, phrases, symbols or characters implying
the existence of danger or the need for stopping or
maneuvering of a motor vehicle, or
(4) creates in any other way an unsafe distraction for motor
vehicle operators, or
(5} obstructs the view of motor vehicle operators entering
a public roadway from any parking area, service drive,
private driveway, other thoroughfare.
J. Any sign which obstructs free ingress to or egress from a
required door, window, fire escape or other required exit way.
K. Illegal nonconforming sign, as defined herein.
~. Off-oremise advertising signs or any other sign not pertinent
and clearly incidental to the permitted use on the property where located.
(Ord 14, 1982) i
256-B
~~ it
r1;
'~'
~:
~i
~/
I
J_
z. ~
__s
lOWO OI V81
75 south frontage road
veil, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2136
Y~lF.MORANDUPq
TO: VAIL TOWN COUNC L
FROM: PAM BRANDMEY
DATE: 1000T89
RE: APPOINTMENT OF REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION JUDGES
It is my pleasure to suggest the following five prospective
appointees as judges for the Regular Municipal Election scheduled
Tuesday, November 21, 1989:
Karen Morter
2985 Booth Creek Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Kay Cheney
2754 Basingdale Blvd.
Vail, CO 81657
Lee Bennett
1860 Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Joan Norris
141 W. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Ben Boutell
121 W. Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
9UBUDSUM
y.
n ,,,.
TOWN OF VAIL
1990 BUDGET
Summary of Expenditures by Fund
REVISED 1990
FUND 1988
ACTITAL
---------- 1989
Bt1DGET
------------ 1989
PROJECTED
------------ PROPOSED
BUDGET
------------
General Fund 11,034,315 10,701,476 10,647,091 11,406,806
Capital Projects Fund_ 5,565,564 6,753,955 6,770,710 6,449,020
Conservation Trust Fund 8,710 9,000 5,000 7,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax 1,940,890 2,050,519 1,995,519 2,139,721
Special Parking Assessment 90,402 250,000 250,000 275,000
Heavy Equipment Fund 1,159,814 1,216,340 1,271,204 1,436,529
Computer Project Fund 60,671 240,OC10 240,00Q 0
Debt Service Fund 3,671,320 3,606,847 3,608,597 3,506,058
Health Insurance Fund 351,784 582,000 515,000 630,000
Lionshead Mall Assmnt. Dist. .107,098 92,500 92,500 158,026
Vail Marketing Fund 0 532,000 543,500 571,000
W. V. Assessment District 502,442 13,000 13,000 8,800
Preliminary Total ________24,493,010 26,047,637 25,957,121 26,587,960
--------------------------------------
Less Interfund Transfers ,, ------
___________(5,585,817) (5,652,847) (5,5 3 ,597) (6,178,258)
----------------------------------
TOTAL 18,907,193 20,394,790 20,424,524 20,409,702
~a~NDPeL '
TOWN OF VAIL
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
1/1/89 - 12/31/90
Rrviged: 10/10/1989
SPECIAL
CAPITAL REAL ESTATE PARKING HEAVY VAIL
GENERAL
FUND
PRC)JECTS
7
TRANSFER
ASSESSMENT
EQUIPMENT
MARKETING
DEBT SERVICE ~
;
_____
--- ----------- ,___
____ ____F[
ND____ __TAX FUND
----- FUND FUND FUND FUND TOTAL ;
Fund Balance 1/1/89
2,621,753
1,037,964 ---
1,971,840 -----------
305,677 -------------
333,493 ----------
0 -----
1,428,563
7,699,290
;
Projected 1989 Revenue
11,685,425
6,582,921
2,050,000
510,000
1,226,0.00
555,500
3,606,847 '
;
26,216,693 ;
;
Projected 1989 Expenditures 10,647,091 6,770,710 1,995,519 250,000 1,271,204 555,500 3,608,597 25,098,621 ;
Gain/(Loss)
1,038,334
( 187,789)
54,481 -
260,000 ------------
( 45 204) -----------
0 -- ---------
( 1,750) - ------------
1,118,072
;
Transfer to Debt Service/Parking (1,512,000) ( 488,000) ( 500,000) 2
500
000 ~
' !
'
,
, 0
---------------------------
rojected Fund Balance 12/31/89 ---
2,148,087
62,175 -
------
2,026,321
------------
65,677 -----
------------
288,289 -----------
--------
0 -------------
-----
3,926,813
-- -
;
-- ------------
8,817,362
----------- --
;
--
1990 Revenue Budget 11,393 481
' 6 474 000 1,413,400 275,000 1,419,600 571,000 4,181,058
25,747,539 1
;
1990 Expenditure Budget 11 406,806 6,449 020
---- 2,139,721
------------ 275,000
---- 1,436,529 571,000 3,506,058 ; 25,804,134 ;
ain/(Loss)
( 13,325)
24,980
( 726,321) --------
0 ------------
( 16,929)
-----------
0
-----
675,000
--
;
------------
( 56,595)
-
Less Probable 1989 Rollforwards ( 26,000) 0 U 0 0
0 0 ( 26,000) ;
Projected Fund Balance 12/31/90 -------------
2,108,762 ----
387,1,,5
1,300,000
_ 65,677__ _____
___271,360 _______
0
4,601,813
8,734,767
;
IC
8/1 BANNERS IN THE VILLAGE (request:
Slevin)
8/1 STREET ENTERTAINMENT
8/8 TIVOLI LANDSCAPING
8/8 UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FOR
ARTERIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
8/8 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION
{request: Lapin)
8/8 POST OFFICE BUILDING
REMODEL/ACCESS
8/15 VVCWD/TOV LAND CONTRACT
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
S
10/13/89
Page 1
FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
PETER: Arrange location and placement of permanent
banner poles at any location other than Pepi's.
PAM: No more rock 'n roll. Perhaps no more jazz?
'PETER: What is the status?
KRISTAN: Provide costs to individuals to convert to
underground. Provide firm number for TOV's
'portion by budget time. Inventory all above-
ground wiring.
LARRY: Provide more enforcement power to Holy Cross
to require undergrounding.
LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for
annexation.
STAN: Redesign access w/CDOH as relates to remodel.
IRON: Contract in final stages of negotiation.
8/7 Have asked Ampersand for design for Lionshead east entry.
Will explore with Ampersand alternative banner pole
locations in Village. Peter to check with Ampersand on
status of request.
Review meeting held September 20. Business survey being
developed. Will be ready 10/31 for distribution.
Landscaping and other work will be done by Nov. 1. They're
asking until next spring to complete the rock walls.
Received letter from New Electric detailing costs for each
property. Community Development will write letters to
property owners for their response. Council will discuss
on Oct. 24.
Prepared memo for Town Council on utility wire under-
grounding. Holy Cross has provided additional
information.
Annexation map is being produced. Annexation should be
completed by Jan. 1st so Intermountain can be
included in our census count. Susan has completed
research and submitted updated plats to Dan Corcoran.
(When space needs are determined, access redesign will be
done.
Larry and Jim Collins are working on contract.
8/15 POINT OF SALES TAX COLLECTION (CHARLIE/STEVE B.: Schedule discussion. (Further research per Merv.
(request: Lapin)
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 10/13/89
Page 2
TnpIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
8/15 NO SMOKING ORDINANCE/RESTAURANTS
8/25 CASCADE VILLAGE LIGHT
8/25 VAIL VILLAGE INN TRIANGLE
8/29 UTRC HANDRAILS (request: Slevin)
8/29 SIGN NEAR SKI MUSEUM (request:
Lapin and Cathy Douglas]
8/29 HIGHWAY RESEEDING OF FILL AREAS
(request: Steinberg)
RON/SUSAN: Schedule for WS. Compile stats on
success/compliance/problems with towns currently
under such an ordinance.
STAN: Light missing at the intersection of West-
haven and South Frontage Road.
PETER: Landscaping inappropriate.
,STAN: John and Ron feel they are in terrible shape
I Handrails are going to be treated or in some way
'~ fixed before winter.
STAN: Some type of dead end indication sign needs
to be placed on Vail Road as you are approaching
the Ski Museum from the north indicating that a
that a right turn is a dead end.
STAN: Could wildflower seed be mixed with grass se
and the reseeding program for all the fill areas
along the Interstate.
Research underway. A synopsis of what other municipalities
have done is being prepared. Susan has contacted Aspen &
Telluride, and has their ordinances. She will be contact-
ing businesses in these communities to find out pros and
cons. The No Smoking Group is responsible for developing
their request to Council. Susan plans to make her report
to Council on Oct. 17th.
Peter has sent Andy a letter asking if he'll pay us to put
one in. Andy will contribute Cascade light if Public
Works installs the light and coordinates work with Eagle
office of CDOH. Rich Perske agrees with this solution as
long as Town Engineer approves light and Eagle CDOH office
ok's the project.
Joe Staufer has agreed to concrete triangle this fall. Date
for completion shall be the end of October.
Cost estimates received. Replacements ordered. Will be
installed before winter.
Sign ordered to say "No Through Traffic" with arrow to
the right. Installation approximately 10/22/89.
Contacted CDOH landscaper in Grand Junction, and revege-
tation plan was requested. Presented Council's request
to him. CDOH has all information on wildflower seeding
under consideration.
8/29 WILLOW CIRCLE LANgSCAPING (STAN: Please contact Joan Whittenburg concerning Stan triedyto call Joan three times. Letter sent to Joan in
(request: Steinber ) improvements in Willow Circle. Kentuck .
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
10/13/89
Page 3
TOPIC _ QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
9/5 GATEWAY PROJECT SIGNAGE
9/5 DOG CONTROL (request: Steinberg)
9/5 RUDER-REINEKE BUSINESS LICENSE
(request: Cacioppo)
9/5 CALL UP PROCEDURE FOR PEC AND
DRB DECISIONS (request: Steinberg)
(PETER: Developer wishes to place explanatory sign,
although he does not have a building permit.
DICK/PETER/STAN: Better signage required.
PETER/DANI: Are they operating illegally in East
Uail?
LARRY: Work out wording to disallow the call
up procedure for PEC and DRB decisions to be
allowed without consensus.
AMOCO has been contacted re: placement of sign stating some-
thing similar to "Pardon my dust." CD will follow up this
week.
Ampersand to design a more aesthetic sign and placement at
entrance of Ford Park Lower Bench, as well as parks/paths/
etc.
Community Development investigation of zoning matters in
process. Letter sent to Ruder, and he has responded.
Being reviewed by Larry and CD. Pritz sent a second
letter requesting additional information. Bob has
received the letter, is not happy with it, and will be
discussing it with Peter on 10/13.
Resolution is being developed.
9/19 TREE CUTTING ON STREAMTRACT PETER/KEN: Sonnenalp and Village Center cutting Pete Burnett and Matt Hecker (PD) took pictures, and Matt is
(request: Steinberg) down trees on streamtract adjacent to their doing a police report. PD, CD, and Larry will decide
property. appropriate action. Betsy is making list of DRB
guidelines that pertain to illegal tree cutting.
i 4
To: Ron Phillips
Council Members
From: Steve Thompson
Datee October lI, 1989
Rea Investment Report
Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of September 30,
1989.
The balance of the portfolio at September 30, was $12.5 million
which was $115,000 more than at the end of August and is 39% more
than the balance at the same time last year.
Over the next GO days we will spend approximately $8.8 million
dollars in Debt Service payments and on Capitol Projects which are
winding down.
Our goal is to try and free.up $2.5 million dollars by January to
meet the long term financing goals related to the Parking Structure
expansion.
:Charles Wick
Town of Vail, Colorado
Investment Report
Summary of Accounts and Investments
for the Month Ending September 30, 1989
Money Market Accounts (see page 1)
Commercial Banks
Colorado Investment Pools
Total
Funds For Reserve Balances Percentage Percentage
Operating Funds * 9/30/89 of Total Allowed
---------------------------------------------------------
5929,544 5200,824 51,130,368 9.02% 50%
51,017,382 51,017,382 8.11% 100%
------------------------------------ ------
51,946,926 5200,824 52,147,750 17.13%
Commercial Savings 8
Banks Loans
Certificates of Deposit (see page -----------
2) ------------
Eagle County Institutions 5210,992 5200,000 $10,992 5210,992 1.68%
Other.Colorado Institutions 599,000 599,000 599,000 0.79%
National Institutions 52,079,000
----------- 51,584,000
------------ 52,673,000
-- 5990,000 53,663,000 29.22%
Total
52,388,992
51,584,000 ---------
52,873,000 -------------
51,099,992 ------------
53,972,992 ------
31.69% 100%
Percentage of Portfolio in Savings & Loans 12.63% 25%
U.S. Government Securities (see page 3)
Repurchase Agreements 52,002,444 52,002,444 15.97% 75%
Treasury Notes 5230,000 5850,000 51,080,000 8.61% 100%
GNMA's 5182,340 5182,340 1.45% 100%
U.S. Savings Bonds 516,884 516,884 0.13% 100%
Federal Agency Discount Notes 53,135,251
---- 53,135,251 25.01% 100%
Total --------
55,566,919 ------------------------
5850,000 56,416,919 ------
51.17%
Total Portfolio
Maturing Within 12 Months
Maturing Within 24 Months
Maturing After 24 Months
* 52,150,816 is reserves that the Town does not have access to for operations
510,386,845 52,150,816 $12,537,661 100.00%
59,872,437 78.74%
51,840,000 14.68%
5825,224 6.58%
512,537,661 100.00%
10/4/89 SLML
INVSM909
Money Market Accounts
as of September 30, 1989
--For the Month of September- Account
Institution Balances
Type of Accounts High Lou Average 9/30/89
------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
First Bank of Vail - Operating
Interest 8.140% 8.060% 8.100%
Balance 51,573,715 5428,913 81,161,033 5910,812
First Bank of Vail - Insurance
Interest 8.140% 8.060% 8.100%
Balance ________________________________
Colorado Trust (Investment Pool)
Interest
Balance
Central Bank of Denver Reserve Accounts
Interest
Balance
Central Bank of Denver Operating Account
Interest
Balance
$198,824
8.490%
51,017,382
5.000%
52,000
7.991%
518,732
---------------
2,147, 750
---------------
---------------
10/3/89 SLML
INVMM909 Page 1
d
Certificates of Deposit
as of September 30, 1989
Bank Name, Location Days to
Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity
Ins Coupon Yield Date
--------- Date
-
-
----
- at Purchase Value
-
---
--------------------------
--
First American Bank, Boston Mass --
-
- -------------- ---
---
FDIC 10.290% 10.290% 12-Nov-87 12-Nov-90 1096 599,000
Vail Nat ional Bank
FDIC 8.750% 8.750% 04-Apr-89 04-Apr-90 365 510,992
FDIC 9.250X 9.250% 03-Jan-89 03-Jan-90 365 5100,000
FDIC 9.250% 9.250X 26-Jan-89 26-Jan-90 365 5100,000
Central Bank of Denver Reserved funds
FDIC 8.400% 8.400% 05-Oct-88 05-Oct-89 365 599,000
First Federal of the Carolinas, High Point North Carolina
FSLIC 10.250% 10.250% 30-Mar-89 30-Mar-90 365 599,000
Firstate Financial, Orlando Florida
FSLIC 10.500% 10.250% 31-Mar-89 02-Apr-90 367 599,000
Bank of Horton, Horton Kansas
FDIC 10.500% 10.500% 12-Apr-89 10-Oct-89 181 599,000
Hawthorn e Savings and Loan Association, Oceanside California
FSLIC 9.750% 9.750% 18-Apr-89 30-Nov-89 226 599,000
First Na tional Bank of Glens Falls, G lens Falls Neu York
FDIC 9.750% 9.750% 18-Apr-89 30-Nov-89 226 599,000
Exeter Banking Company, New Hampshire
FDIC 9.900% 9.900% 18-Apr-89 30-Nov-89 226 599,000
San Antonio Federal Savings Bank, Weslaco Texas
FSLIC 10.500% 10.SOOX 03-Apr-89 03-Apr-90 365 599,000
Security Savings and Loan, Chicago Illinois
FSLIC 9.950% 9.950% 18-Apr-89 18-Apr-90 365 599,000
Midstate Savings and Loan Associaton, Baltimore Maryland
FSLIC 10.350% 10.100% 21-Apr-89 18-Oct-90 545 599,000
First Savings and Loan, Beverly Hills California Reserved Funds
FSLIC 10.375% 10.125% 10-Apr-89 03-Jun-91 784 599,000
Franklin Bank, Menlo Park California
FDIC 10.OOX 10.00% 17-Apr-89 16-Oct-89 182 599,000
Sterling Savings and Loan, Irvine California Re served Funds
FSLIC 10.500% 10.250% 10-Apr-89 02-Dec-91 966 599,000
Bay Loan & Investment Bank, East Greenwich, RI, Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.300% 9.050% 11-Jul-89 02-Dec-91 874 599,000
Homestead Savings Association, Middletown, PA, Reserved Funds
FSLIC 9.100% 8.900% 21-Jul-89 02-Dec-91 864 599,000
Security Pacific State Bank, Irvine, CA
FDIC 9.150% 8.900% 11-Jul-89 11-Jul-90 365 599,000
51,893,992
Page 2 Continued
Certificates of Deposit Continued
as of September 30 1989
Bank Name, Location Days to
Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity
Ins Coupon Yield Date Date
------------------------------------ at Purchase Value
------------
Brentwood Square Savings and Loan, Los Angeles C ---------------
alifornia Reser ---------
ved Funds
FSLIC 10.150% 9.900% 09-May-89 OS-May-91 729 599,000
First Chesire Bank, Keene New Hampshire
FDIC 10.100% 9.850% 15-May-89 14-May-90 364 599,000
Trustcorp Bank, Toledo Ohio
FDIC 9.750% 9.890% 12-May-89 14-May-90 367 599,000
St. Edmond's Savings and Loan Association, Philadelphia Pennsyl vania
FSLIC 10.250% 10.000% 05-May-89 OS-Nov-90 549 599,000
Monadnock Bank, Jaffrey Neu Hampshire
FD[C 10.000% 9.750% 12-May-89 14-May-90 367 599,000
Fidelity Federal Savings Bank, Richmond Virginia
FSLIC 10.000% 10.000% 05-May-89 07-May-90 367 $99,000
Eastern Savings Bank, Hunt Valley Maryland
FSLIC 9.750% 9.750% 17-May-89 30-Nov-89 197 599,000
Kislak National Bank, North Miami Florida
FDIC 9.700% 9.700% 25-May-89 25-May-90 365 599,000
Standard Pacific Savings and Loan, Newport California Reserved Funds
FSLIC 9.875% 9.670% 26-May-89 28-May-91 732 599,000
Century Bank and Trust, Somerville Massachusetts Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.450% 9.450% 26-May-89 26-Nov-90 549 599,000
Century Bank of Suffolk, Suffolk Massachusetts Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.450% 9.450% 30-May-89 29-Nov-90 548 599,000
Republic National Bank, Phoenix Arizona Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.750% 9.500% 30-May-89 29-Nov-90 548 599,000
Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust, Lyndonville, VT, Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.250% 9.050% 26-Jul-89 01-Jun-92 1041 599,000
First Capital Bank, Concord, NH
FDIC 9.000% 9.000% 07-Jul-89 01-Dec-89 147 599,000
Center Bank, Waterbury, CT
FDIC 9.250% 9.120% 07-Ju1-89 05-Oct-89 90 599,000
Souhegon National Bank, Milford, NH
FDIC 9.350% 9.100% 07-Jul-89 03-Jan-90 180 $99,000
Mission Viejo National Bank, Mission Viejo, CA
FDIC 9.400% 9.150% 10-Jul-89 05-Apr-90 269 599,000
Coast Bank, Long Beach, CA
FDIC 9.250% 9.000% 10-Jul-89 10-Jul-90 365 599,000
Charter Bank for Savings, Santa Fe, NM
FSLIC 9.250% 9.000% 10-Jul-89 13-Jul-90 368 599,000
51, 881,000
Page 2 Continued
Certificates of Deposit Continued
as of September 30, 1989
Bank Name, Location Days to
Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity
Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------
East Bank, Neu York, NY
FDIC 9.000% 8.900% 11-Jul-89 11-Jul-91 730 599,000
Uestside Savings and Loan Association, CA
FSLIC 9.200% 8.950% 03-Aug-89 12-Mar-90 221 599,000
Avg Yield 9.339% 53,972,992
--------- ------------
--------- ------------
Avg Days to Maturity 297
invcd909 Page 2
10/3/89 slml
Government Securities
as of September 30, 1989
***Treasury Notes***
Rates
Coupon Yield
-------------------------
8.875% 7.470%
8.875% 9.067'/
9.375% 9.630%
8.250% 8.259%
Average Maturity Years
Average Yield
***Repurchase Agreements***
Years to
Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Par
Date Date at Purchase Maturity Value
--------------------------------------------------------
11-Mar-86 15-Feb-96 9.94 6.38 5230,000
02-Dec-88 30-Nov-90 1.99 1.17 5250,000
28-Feb-89 28-Feb-91 2.00 1.41 5200,000
31-Aug-89 31-Aug-91 2.00 1.92 $400,000
2.72 51,080,000
8.53% ____________
Average Purchase Maturity Par
Institution Yield Date Date Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prudential Bache 8.790% 20-Dec-88 Open 52,002,444
52,002,444
***GNMA'S***
Years to Estimated
Purchase Maturity Maturity Years to Principal
Pool
------------ Coupon
------------ Yield
-------- Date
- Date at Purchase Maturity Outstanding
5803
8.000%
8.480% ----------
14-Nov-86 -----------
15-Oct-05 -----------
19.10 -----------
16.00 --------------
545,143
13003 8.000% 9.500% 24-Oct-86 15-Oct-06 20.20 17.00 565,054
14659 8.000% 9.200% 24-Oct-86 15-Jan-07 21.20 18.00 572,143
Avg Yield 9.129% 5182,340
***U.S. Savings Bonds***
Years to
Issue Maturity Maturity Years to Book Maturity
Series
------ Yield
---------- Date
----------- Date
---------- at Purchase
- Maturity Value Value
EE
7.170%
01-Oct-86
01-Oct-96 ------------
10.00 -----------
7.01 ------------
516,884
------------ ------------
530,000
------------
***Federal Agency Discount Notes
*** ------------ ------------
Days to
Purchase Maturity Maturity Days to Book Maturity
Yield
---------- Date
----------- Date
---------
- at Purchase Maturity Value Value
FHLB
10.353%
03-Apr-89 -
30-Nov-89 ------------
241.00 -----------
61.00 ------------
5233,816 ------------
5250,000
FHLB 10.069% 05-Apr-89 01-Dec-89 240.00 62.00 5234,300 5250,000
FHLB 9.851% 19-Apr-89 20-Oct-89 184.00 20.00 5238,168 5250,000
FHLB 9.940% 20-Apr-89 26-Oct-89 189.00 26.00 5950,965 51,000,000
FHLB 9.400% 25-May-89 25-May-90 365.00 237.00 5500,000 5500,000
FHLB 8.490% 11-Jul-89 15-Nov-89 127.00 46.00 5485,660 5500,000
FHLB 8.474% 28-Jul-89 03-Oct-89 67.00 3.00
- 5492,342
------------ 5500,000
-----------
53,135,251 53,250,000
Average Maturity Days 65 _ ____________ ___________
Average Yield 9.43%
Total 56,416,919
10/3/89 slml
invtr909 Page 3
DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST
BRIAN ANDERSON
STEVE BARWICK
PETE BURNETT
DICK DURAN
CAROLINE FISHER
ANNIE FOX
JOHN GALLEGOS
PETER PATTEN
FILE
ERNST GLATZLE
SKIP GORDON
GREG HALL
SUSIE HERVERT
JIM HOZA
KEN HUGHEY
JOE KOCHERA
HANK LOVATO
CINDY VAN HOOSE-
SORENSEN
TOWN COUNCIL
GARY MURRAIN
JOE NORRIS
MIKE ROSE
TODD SCROLL
LEO VASQUEZ
CHARLIE WICK
PAT DODSON
MEMORANDUM
TO% RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER
FROM% STAN BERRYMAN, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION
DATEe OCTOBER 9, 1989
REa PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF
OCTOBER 9 - 13, 1989
STREETS AND ROADS
A. 1. Pave at the following locationso
a. EV Fire Station b. Nugget Lane
c. Timberfalls
2. Install large rocks to block Donovan Park access.
3. Construct East Vail Bike Path shoulders.
4. Fill planters with dirt at following locationso
a. Antlers Planter b. Vorlaufer Planter
c. Mountain Haus Planter
5. Construct bus pull-off area at West Vail Mall.
6. Provide gravel at BH Park.
7. Mowing crew to plant shrubs at BH Park and perform
general cleanup of area.
B. 1. Repair brick pavers at Checkpoint Charlie.
2. Perform patching repair at LHTRC.
3. Install grease reel at PW Bay.
4. Install curb & gutter at E. Lionshead Circle west of
LTRC.
5. Implement bus stop improvements at the following
locationso
a. Circle K (south side)
b. Ford Park
6. Construct sidewalk from Gold Peak to Ford Park.
7. Relocate planter at Ford Park tennis courts for VMRD.
8. Utilize loader to straighten trees on berm at Shop.
9. Remove benches and other furniture from Lionshead Mall.
10. Remove bike path curb stops.
11. Install gasline trench at EV Fire Station for radiant
heating system.
PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST
PAGE 2
STREET AND ROADS (Cont°d)
B. 12. Install °°November°° parking signs at various locationso
a. Sunburst Turnaround
b. Aspen Lane
PARKING STRUCTURE
A. 1. Install
2. Install
3. Demo He
4. Install
arrive.
5. Install
6. Replace
CARPENTERS
fresh air supply to PD Dispatch Room.
vestibule at LTRC Auxiliary Building
rtz°s office - 3rd floor VTRC.
replcement wooden handrails for VTRC when they
drains at LH Charter Bus Lot.
entryway at LHTRC.
A. 1. Design new bus shelter as replacement for old ones.
2. Repair bus shelter at Vail Mountain School.
3. Construct playground equipment for Bighorn Park.
4. Oil outside of Library.
5. Move solar screens from Library to VTRC.
6. Rekey parking structures.
7. Install concrete pad for WV Mall Bus Shelter.
B. 1. Construct bus stop posts and recreational path signs.
2. Construct cover for Sandstone Park slide.
3. Build shelf at Library.
4. Build plant stand for Library.
5. Sandblast signs for .VTRC.
6. Install glass in the west side of the Inn at Vail bus
stop shelter (behind Inn at Vail).
7. Install steel shelves at PD Detective area.
ELECTRICIANS
A. 1. Add new meters & disconnects at various locationso
a. Bald Mountain Road
2. Correct fire alarm violatins in Gymnastics Center.
3. Install new 3 phase panel with 100 amp main and 24
circuits at Seibert Circle.
4. Turn on exhaust motors at VTRC.
5. Run wire for Bighorn Park.
6. Relocate pedestrian crossing light at Municipal
Building.
7. Repair street light on Bald Mountain Road<
8. Repair lights at Teen Center.
9. Perform line locates at following arease
a. EV Bike Path b. LHTRC
PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST
PAGE 3
--$~sc~~~~~A~s -~~~sr~tac~~ -
A. 10. Repair the following street lightse
a. Covered Bridge Bus Stop b. ATorth End LHTRC
11. Install underground conduit for Ford Park.
B. 1. Install additional lighting at 1st level entrance ski
storage.
2. Install new hotsy in PW shop.
3. Perform various electrical work at Ice Arenae
a. Install new wire moulding and switch in managers
office.
b. Move low voltage light switches from office to
zamboni room.
c. Move welding plug to new location and add plug-in
strip.
d. Research information on plug-in strip (sockets)
for special event power.
e. Add flourescent light fixture in boiler area.
f. Replace 2 ballasts in locker rooms.
g. Change EM light ballasts.
h. Add outlets in Dennis°s new office.
4. Repair outlet near little copier at Municipal Building
- see Tracy.
5. Install electrical outlet for printer at Rec
Department.
6. Perform maintenance jobs at Libraryo
a. Unhook stove in Community Room
b. Change several ballasts
7. Contact Annie at Library for various electrical
repairs. (see memo)
8. Add lights at LH Charter Bus Lot.
9. Install power supply for Bus Wash Facility.
10. Check exhaust fans at both structures.
IRRIGATIOTV
A. 1. Spray East Vail Bike Path.
2. Drain all irrigation systems, drinking fountains as
weather dictates.
3. Install loops at LHTRC entrances and exits.
SB/slh
n'
,. ~,
Rf.[; a OCT g 2
STATE OF COLORADO
E;®L®RAD® DEPAEtT'A9ER1T ®F F9EALTF6
4210 East 11th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80220
Phone (303) 320-8333
MEMORANDUM
T0: Interested Parties Thomas M. Vernon, M.D.
F;~tOM: Dick Parachini. , Eagle Mine On-Site Coordinator Executive Director
C_)A'CE : October 11 , 1989
~t.~B,7ECT: State Air Monitoring Results
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The followinc_r is a summary of the air monitoring data collected.
h-.r the seven additional ai.r monitors operated by the State of
rolarada during the Eagle Mine remedial activities.
D~<te Minturn Middle
School-Front
09/21/89 TSP
Pb
Cd
As
09/2?./89 TSP
Pb
Cd
As
Minturn Middle
Schaol Foyer
OF ' CSC
~~~ ~~ .
~Q 49F:4~?E~ 94
H lJ i
l} ~ ~,
rw a ,
`* ra76 -°
Roy Romer
Governor
Minturn Community
Center Rooftop
13 ua/m-3
<0.1 ug/m-3
<0.01 ua/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
16 unim-3
<0.1 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
<O.OS ug/m-3
1.0?_ ua/m-3
<0.1 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
Data to be reported
in J.0/13 update
09 23/89 TSP 24 uc1/m-3
Pb <0.1 ug/m-3
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
As 0.01 ug/m-3
09/24!89 TSP 14 ug/m-3
Ph <0.1 ug/m-3
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
As <0.01 ug/m-3
0
09/25/89 TSP 31 ud/m-3
Pb <0.1 ua/m-3
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
As 0.026 ug/m-3
09/26/89 TSP 27 ug/m-3
v v y .:..~ ~ ,.. v
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
As <0.01 ug/m-3
83 ug/m-3
<0.1 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
62 ug/m-3
<0.1 ug/m-3
<0.01 ug/m-3
<0.01 ua/m-3
09,/27/89 TSP 29 ug/m-3 ~ • . ~•
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
As 0.01 ug/m-3
'('};:~ ~:;r]nrnnc, h)~'nartment c)f HFa]t:h Labori:+t:(,.ry ana.]yt'jcal results
r~r~or.t .ind]c~atfr t})fr ocr..urrence of a ?.9-hour ~tverac_te~ ~-iir cc~ncE'ntration
c)f t r~;er?.i.c at or a},c~~zF thf, a.j.r monjt:orin~! trgger va]tte~;. The
(~-;1"~~: of oc:cttrr.ence wire ~;Ar.temhE~r ?3, ?.`~, a.nci ?7, 7c~T:~a and we]'e
rer,nrdr,r~ Y_,y a j r mom;] j t nr~> ] orated in the frnt,t. of t}:~f= T,; i.r~T_t,r'n N j c:{d.lc~
r~
•,'}lf=' tT' nnt'r V~ ]t1 E'. fOT' , ~ ~
}got}: er~.en]c -:.nc~ Ccsd!it1t.?;71 i~ O.ni. uo!;r.-;3. This
t]"' .C~rcC]" •~r;~_].ttf- _i C ~°t at: a =;eve1 C= i lCIht1V ~C1[lt?C t'i1F-? 7. I') ~. ~-~,>>,=~°'ilt
Ci(°lr-':":tjG~) ]1l?iat t}1~!t )rOV]C;e:> czi"! i=C'tlr.c3tf' r71i' ) ~-,i ~a
T dI'_t j f j ~:,_ ~ P tT'.. . t7?^E?31?F~n+
CI :_,T~eI'ij.C all C] Cc~dn;;i.l'llli• T}1F E'li?1s~1C)rl ]"_t~r!!1jT IeVe.].~ t-or TSF', Cc~,dliij.tlltl
!C;cal a.nca lea:ci (PY?1 wex~f~ not e~<-:eec?ec] f..r•ont SFntet?tbF~r 21 f=o SFnter)}~er
2 t . The e]f~vzteci TSF ~,;.lue:~~ recorder] ;n the m:;d~ .]e sr.heo:l toyer
tile.\T`: }'1("'F'.i? r::c?t.l'_'f?fl Y)',7 V1r1})1E' "I1Tl'C" ltl t}le a1r f1]tF_'rE= 1CI':'i;i 1:C :].E?Ci cam?
.,o ;.tor =: r;r~ poJ wester fiber=: .
:_PS,E' ~:7?!c'le jT"!C]C~C;'tS tp pnt nO~F? ari jmlpFr~1:.':P ('r1t'tCP?'r frCai the
iC": i't'r' r)j'c:] t}~! E't1 F:CtS ~tinCLT~C_~1n ~: T}-IE~ 1.1E?T)ci?"' :_%1Pnt Cat FlE':-. } t h 1~:.
(::i7t^7'c'.1"1?'_~V e~Tc)]Ltc~f"p:t f:]'!r? 1^'=C:ttTr?.?1(7 f]'E?C;t?E'Yir'j% of t}lE :-1rSEi")1C c+lT'
C-nr{C:c..!-t.?.,_-ft:?~7~c ~t t:i1F t]":i.CiC.rr ~eVG-'~~: TYE:=1));ti ';U.CIl ~~<;. ~iJE'(~]?'JC
c'UT't`::TI'llt""`. ]C'•i7 c`Ir't_i~.1't:.'.•.E'~- ~c~1'1I7C~~ Tt?a'CE=r'i.~1_ t'rc`1~.nUrt ~].tE: ~!1)~,
r,,Uri ;. rC)1 , ~ :! tE:' ;?ie'tEU?"'C'!• c?;7 i C' d?ta., inc.re~se; ~ .eas~nal vaoOd btarn inc; and
:IrsC:Y'ea.;=~_:c? t]~~f-=iC c: .'lC?rlc? 1'-~;;]_nt ~cI^i: rood 8r~. c<] l }~~Fin(-t ~3rld.lV:'.pCZ.
Vic;?: ~%f= c..~.;t cc~ntro ~ jai ~ ~ co_-?t ir!l~.e i:n },.== ;.mnien:cntf~d a+: the .~:.i to .
•7.'y.~ ;~:qT.('~?"-C.,.~'- l r,;1 ,-Jf )x %'.~:+='I"' 1 ...~ t;rJ %}-!F T'.;rV- 7`r l 1 :t]C7S t'1 ~E` }]iris= b(?fP11
,;--~°e<<_>~:-c start_ir,c7 th..- wF }z ~; ~c r 2 as
'e ~ Oc ~" )bF- part of the a~;?roved
~•.'.i.;. ~'~,. E>};U.td0Vdr7 iprr)rF~C7;~rZ~~ ,
!~ ~'r_)i:lt::rF't'f'2pS1.VE' }..~a_%t}. P~~dlilf.,t7.Ct7 O t}1° Sf'~?tem}?er x.11^ J??OI11tOr1nC7
"r`,,~..! "•.:;~ V1i ~ ~iE' `)eI"?'Crrtr-,-3 c_?'!C. 1`?C ].l"tr}Fd 1]7 t}"1e L?j_11.C;i~ 1.Tlt? 1'.lOnt}1 .. V
~,Pr~r.-,;"t.. '''}~„? ir!p?~!~-Y?.!~' rF.r,,C~rT: jN? ]. }")F ?"'E']F~~~tir' Ji7 3l??.Ci-Ur'tOri~r C;=+Pr c.11
tY:IE' CF?~i_E'T71!:;C3r cilr 17:~n1t:?ri2"itT I'CS1.1 ~'~C }7aVE' bE'~n CQ] ].FCtE'Ci
:~'r,r ac3d] t i.o:ial 117fOrt;l2.tj.Gt:), p].ea~?e contact Dir.}: P~~ra.c:]~,irli (~+t [-5928 )
s
a
COLORADO DEPAR'T`1ENT OF HEALTH C'D 0 C T - 2 ~ggg
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
INI'ER.OFFICE COM~IUNICATION
TO: Interested Parties
FRCn~1: Dick Parachini, Eagle Mine On-Site Coordinator ~~~
DATE: September 28, 1989
SUB.TECT: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -- Augt.rst 1989
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The following is an update re?arding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program
during the 1989 construction season. The airborne particulate data collected
by the Gulf + Western air monitors shown in the accompanying table are
preliminary in nature. This me:~ns that the values, particularly the metals
levels, may be revised after auditing and validation by the contractor and the
State. The information is useful in assessing emissions and sLrbsequent dust
control. dur.•ing construction, a5 well as trends in lx~tential human exposure.
The Colorado Department of Health received analytical results reports that
indicate the occurrence of a 24-hour average arsenic. air concentration in
excess of the air monitoring program trigger values. The trigger value for
arsenic was exceeded on August 29 at the Minturn Middle School rooftop station
(0.012 ug/m3). The emission permit trigger value for both arsenic and cadmium
is 0.01 ug;m3. This trigger value is set at a level s.liohtly above the
instrument detection limit that provides an accurate, quantifiable measurement
of arsenic and cadmitun. The emission permit levels for TSP (Total Suspended
Particulates) and Pb (..lead), and C_d (cadmium) were not exceeded during the
August time period.
The less than (<) or less than/equal to (<_} notations mean that the
laboratory instrument detection limit for the particular sample analysis was
measuring right at the quoted metal concentration.
The State air monitoring data has been evaluated separtately and with the
attached air monitoring data. Evaluation of the August 1989 air monitoring
data indicates that the average airborne concentrations or arsenic and cadmium
are adequately protective for children at the Minturn diddle School and rl;riloit
Park residents.
The State and Gulf + Western air monitoring data will continue to be
separately and jointly evaluated through the 1989 construction and winter
shut-down seasons. For further information, please contact Dick Parachini
(827-5928) or Mike McHugh (331-4845).
/cf
AIRBORNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS
EAGLE MINE SITE
. AUGUST 1989
(u9/m3)
SCHOOL SITE NORTH/CROSS CREEK SITE
Date
Sampled TSP* Pb** As Cd PM10 TSP* Pb** As Cd PM10
08/02/89 17.9 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.009 13.9 17.0 0.006 < 0.002 < 0.007 ----
08/05/89 21.5 < 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.008 16.0 23.1 0.012 < 0.002 < 0.007 16.6
08/08/89 28.4 0.005 0.005 < 0.009 19.3 24.8 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.008 20.8
08/11/89 16.5 0.008 < 0.002 < 0.009 13.9 14.1 0.008 < 0.002 < 0.007 12.2
08/14/89 17.8 0.005 ~< 0.002 < 0.009 13.3 16.3 0.007 < 0.002 < 0.008 13.6
08/17/89 16.1 0.011 ~< 0.002 < 0.008 12.6 20.5 0.019 0.008 <0.008 13.1
08/20/89 13.3 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.007 11.8 8.5 < 0.003 < 0.002 < 0.006 6.7
08/23/89 22.5 0.020 0.006 < 0.007 15.5 21.3 0.012 < 0.002 < 0.006 13.8
08/26/89 19.6 0.006 0.003 < 0.007 14.6 18.3 0.008 < 0.002 < 0.006 ----
08/29/89 21.2 0.013 0.012 < 0.007 16.8 22.8 0.005 0.005 < 0.006 ----
* =Permit limitation 150 Ng/m3
** =Permit limitation 1.5 }~g/m3
THESE DATA ARE PROVISIONAL AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER AUDITING AND VALIDATION
F ..~
ASCU SEP 2 9 W&9
STATE OF COLORADO
COLORADO DEPARTPAERI7' OF HEALTH ~F~
o
~`~ ~ ~
4210 East l l lh Avenue yQ ~C.j;,~.ld~ 9
Denver, Colorado 80220 O
I
;.
~
Phone (303) 320-8333 ,
~'' ~;, `~°) (;r °
MFMnFAND(1M
~ X876 °~
Roy Romer
Governor
T0: 7nterestec~ Parties
Thomas M. Vernon, M.U.
r'.kc:~fh; Dick Parart~ini, Eac_?le Mine On-Site Coordinator Executive Director
nA'1'E : September 28 , 1 989
SUB7ECT; State A.].r Manitorina Results
--------------------------------------------------------------------
'1'he fo) ]owi.ng i~~ a summary of the a.ir monitoring data collected
by the seven additional ai.r mnnitnrc operated by the State of
Colorado dtlr.i.ng the Eagle Mine r.emedia]. activities.
i'~zte Mintv.rn.Mi.cidl_e
Schoo]-Frgnt
09/]4.89 TSR.._.]4 uaim-3
Fh <0.1 ucr!m-3
Cd <0.01 11 C7 lm-3
Mintu.rn Middle Minturn Community
School Foyer Center kooftop
09 i 15!89 TSP 14 u.a%'m-:~
09 / ] 6 j 89 TSU 16 ug ! m- 6 t~r!m-3
• Pb <0.1 ttgim-3 <0.1 llry/m-3
• C:r,': <0.01 uc~lm-3 <0 • p1 • ur?/m-3
As <0.01 ucT!m-3 <0.01 ug/m-3
09/17/89 TSP 14 ua!m-3
Pb <0.1 ua/m-3
As <0.01 ucl/m-3
". 09/18/89 TSP 20 ua/m-3
Pb <0.1 uc~!m-3
Cd <0.01 ua!m-3
09/19/89 TSP ?.] ug!m-3 72 ug/m-3
• ~
• Cd __
<0 . U1 uc7/m-3 ~,
<0 . O1 Mug/m-3
As <0.01 tag/m-3 <0.01 ua/m-3
09%.20/89 TSP 9 ~la!m-3 ..
Cd <0.01 ug/m-3
Ac <0.01 t~q/m-3
,~.
38 v~!m-3
<0.01 ua/m-3
<0.01 un/m-3
44 ug/m-3
!(1 1 „n /m-7
u J;
<0.01 calm-3
<0.01 ug/m-0
Fnr a~?c-]~t]crna] information, plF:ase cant<act flick. Paractlini (8?.7-59'Lt~)
or Mike M~Hl.lcth !:3 ;i1-4845) .
\\
J -~ ~ ~
~~
1~iYf/~ fl" . ` L
1 J-;~f/ (yam(/ ii`~6~~ ~/~-~Z/Vli,(~~ i`V~ GI~~LG'ti!J' ~T_
C..C~ `t~c..Q ~`-F,~ CL
/.~ /Ln.wwv"r ~c I~n^-C G')^-Z ~ _ ~s • k`-~-,t ~7~~ i.~..-~'L.'`i !/
c~ i
~~ / ~-GAS-=K ~ `~ 7iG.~_
v 3-'.G. x
~.
~:~.,~ S ~-P~a,~,~ Cam- ~~ ~--~'~" , ~ ~,t;-o-u-~ l~-~~- Vie- .~-e
l/, r'~ . ~~nd- ct,,.t -a..c.w-~-crr ~ 3 w-~4z_g_ a :,,R:;.~c ~-~.~ e_:Nti~ r.
c
G~ i ~! J~ ~.~ `ti`~-