Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-05 Support Documentation Town Council Regular SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Charles Davis 2. Approval of Minutes of the November 7 and 21, 1989 Meetings 3. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance amending certain sections of Chapter 16.22 so that Chapter 16.22 regulates signs in the Arterial Business District Zone District of the Town of Vail (ABD) as well as the Commercial Core III Zone District (CC3). 4. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance amending sections of Chapter 18 of the Vail Municipal Code and repealing and re-enacting Section 18.58.310, Short Term Rental Accommodation Unit of the Municipal Code to provide for bed and breakfast operations under certain provisions and circumstances and to define bed and breakfast and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, Booth Creek local improvement district fund, Communities for Drug-Free Eagle Valley fund, special parking assessment fund, Vail marketing fund, Lionshead Mall assessment district fund, and the real estate transfer tax fund, of the 1989 budget and the financial plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein. 6. Appoint Members to the Planning and Environmental Commission 7. Action on Vail Metropolitan Recreation District Tennis Court Ground Lease 8. Sign Variance Request and an Appeal of a Design Review Board Decision, for the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom located at the Inn at Vail, 2211 North Frontage Road (Applicant: Jim Wilson) CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 9. Adjournment VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. ~. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 7:35 7:40 Mike Mollica 1. Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Charles Davis 2. Approval of Minutes of the November 7 and 21, 1989 Meetings 3. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Chapter 16.22 regulating signs in the ABD and CC3 zone district Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, on second reading. Background Rationale: The PEC, at their September 26, 1989 public hearing, unanimously recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the zoning code. Section 4 of the ordinance reflects the wording changes the Council requested at the previous hearing. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, on second reading. 7:55 Peter Patten 4. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, first reading, creating regulations for bed and breakfasts in the Town of Vail Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, on first reading. Background Rationale: The staff, PEC, and Council have been working on bed and breakfast regulations since February 1988. In March of 1989, Council remanded Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1989, back to the PEC upon second reading. We held a PEC/Council joint work session in September 1989 in which the issues were agreed upon. PEC has recommended unanimously to Council that the revised ordinance (No. 31) be adopted. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, on first reading. 8:20 Steve Barwick 5. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, first reading, regarding a supplemental appropriation to the Town budget Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, on first reading. Background Rationale: This is an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the 1989 Town of Vail general fund, real estate transfer tax fund, Booth Creek local improvement district, Communities for a Drug-Free Eagle Valley fund, special parking assessment fund, Vail marketing fund, and the Lionshead Mall assessment district fund. The majority of the dollar amount of this supplemental appropriation is related to the financing of the Village parking structure addition. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, on first reading. 8:40 6. Appoint Members to the Planning and Environmental Commission '_ Peter Patten Action Requested of Council: Appoint three new PEC members to fill Pam Hopkins', Peggy Osterfoss's, and Sid Schultz's positions. Background Rationale: Pam Hopkins resigned from PEC in October 1989. Peggy Osterfoss was elected to Council. Advertising and publiei•zi_.ng for new Commissioners has occurred throughout. the last 2 months. We have 3 applicants to date. Also, Sid Schultz has resigned effective January 1, 1990. Pam and Peggy's terms were to expire in February 1990. Sid's term continues until February 1991. Staff Recommendation: Appoint 3 new PEC members now. Two will take effect immediately, and a third, Sid Schultz's term, will take effect January 1. 8:50 7. Action on VMRD Tennis Court Ground Lease Larry Eskwith Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny the lease agreement. Background Rationale: The VMRD wishes to build a tennis complex on TOV property. They wish to use a lease purchase agreement to finance the project. The lender (lessor) is requiring a ground lease from the Town as security in the event VMRD defaults on their lease payments. Staff Recommendation: There will be a memo for Council. If it is not completed in time to be included in your packets, it will be mailed (or delivered) so you receive it on Monday. 9:05 8. Sign Variance Request and an Appeal of a DRB Decision, for Mike Mollica the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom located at the Inn at Vail, 2211 North Frontage Road (Applicant: Jim Wilson) Action Requested of Council: 1) Approve/deny the requested sign variance. 2) Uphold/overturn the action of the DRB regarding the design of the awning and associated signage. Background Rationale: On October 18, 1989, the Design Review Board, by a vote of 4-1, recommended denial of the sign variance. On November 29, 1989, the DRB, by a vote of 4-0, denied the design of the awning and associated signage. The applicant has appealed this decision. Staff Recommendation: 1) Staff recommends denial of the variance request. 2) Staff does not ordinarily make recommendations regarding compliance with the design guidelines. 9:35 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 9:50 9. Adjournment -2- -MINUTES - - - VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 1989 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, November 7, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Michael Cacioppo Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: None Ron Phillips, Town Manager Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The first order of business was a Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Mike Rose. Ron Phillips gave background information on Mike, the Superintendent of Parking with the Town of Vail, and this was followed by comments from Stan Berryman. Mike thanked everyone, and Kent Rose stated the Council appreciated Mike's hard work over the years. The second item of business on the agenda was a consent agenda of the following items: A. Approval of the October 3 and 17, 1989 Meeting Minutes B. Appointment of Steve Simonett as a Local Licensing Authority Board Member After a brief discussion regarding the minutes, Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the consent agenda, which John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item was Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1989, second reading, adopting a 1990 budget and financial plan. Mayor Rose read the full title. Steve Barwick noted the changes made for second reading. Tom Steinberg questioned the surveyor position and the possibility of a better way to handle it; Mayor Rose agreed he also had questions regarding that and felt it should be put on a future Work Session agenda for discussion. Eric Affeldt commended staff on their reporting and information gathering for Council. He felt the Town was in the best financial position ever, but was disappointed the public was not that interested. He noted he was not in favor of as large an increase in the marketing budget as what was approved at first reading. Mike Cacioppo agreed with Eric regarding the marketing budget, and that was one reason why he voted against the ordinance at first reading. John Slevin briefly explained why he thought it was increased to the final amount. After some discussion, Mayor Rose stated the amount should be left as it was at this point, to be determined later, depending on Town of Avon, Eagle County, and Vail Associates' contributions. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance on second reading with a reduction in the marketing fund to $117,000 instead of the $163,000, and Eric Affeldt seconded. Rob Levine commented why he felt the $163,000 should be left in. A vote was taken and the motion failed 3-4, with Tom Steinberg, Kent Rose, John Slevin, and Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal opposing. Eric Affeldt then made a motion to approve the ordinance on second reading with the marketing fund amount of $163,000. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. Mike Cacioppo remarked he would vote against the ordinance because he did not believe the Community Development Department needed an increase in staff (it should be getting smaller, not larger), he was disappointed there was no West Vail fire station included in the budget, did not agree with a five percent increase for the Town Manager's position, did not agree with the large increase for the Marketing Board budget, or the $35,000 funding to Bravo! Colorado. Mayor Rose remarked there was a five percent increase in the budget, but no actual increase had been approved yet, so the money was not guaranteed to be spent. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1, with Mike Cacioppo opposing. "-. ~ `,- { --- -The foarth--order of business was Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1989, first reading, "-_ regarding sales tax revenue bonds for the parking structure expansion and renovation. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Charlie Wick introduced Steve Jeffers, of Kirchner Moore, and Dee Wisor, of Sherman & Howard. Steve distributed revised copies of the ordinance with changes made earlier today. He reviewed the changes and explained the reasoning for them. Steve then answered questions of Council. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next issue was Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1989, first reading, establishing a program of investments to provide for the payment of the Town's outstanding bonds. Mayor Rose read the full title. Steve Jeffers noted two minor changes in the ordinance, and explained what the ordinance would do. He and Dee Wisor then answered questions of Council. After some discussion by Council, Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Mike Cacioppo. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Next was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Special Development District No. 6 converting condominium unit no. 30 from commercial to residential. The full title of the ordinance was read by Mayor Rose. Peter Patten commented this item had been tabled at the last Evening Meeting, and the request was to convert the Goods retail condominium unit in the Vail Village Inn into residential space. He noted there had been some revisions to the proposal since the last meeting; he explained what the changes were. Peter then gave background information regarding Phases I and II of the condominiums in the Vail Village Inn, and added staff continued their recommendation for approval of the conversion. There was then some discussion between Council, Peter Jamar, and Peggy Osterfoss regarding the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision and reasoning for denying the request by a vote of 4-3. A motion to approve the ordinance was then made by Merv Lapin and seconded by Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal. After more discussion between Council and Peter Jamar, a vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Title 17 to provide a definition for single family subdivisions was next on the agenda. Mayor Rose read the full title. Mike Mollica briefly explained the ordinance, and then answered questions of Council. After a short discussion, Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve the ordinance, which Mike Cacioppo seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1, with Merv Lapin opposing. The eighth order of business was Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Section 18.24.020 by adding "Commercial Ski Storage." The full title was read by Mayor Rose. There was no discussion by Council or the public. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance, and John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item was Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Chapter 2.20 by adding an application fee for temporary liquor licenses. Mayor Rose read the complete title. Pam Brandmeyer explained the reasoning for the ordinance, and answered questions of Council. A motion to approve the ordinance on first reading was made by Merv Lapin and seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The tenth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Chapter 16.22 regulating signs in the Arterial Business District and Commercial Core III zone district. Mayor Rose read the title. Mike Mollica gave background information on the ordinance, and commented the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve, with John Slevin seconding. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The last item on the agenda was a Gart Brothers sign variance request. Kristan Pritz reviewed the requests for variances of size, height, and number of signs, and reviewed criteria used for the requests. She then explained why staff recommended approval. Kristan commented the Design Review Board had approved the requests by a 5-0 vote for the variance, and a 4-1 vote for the design; one did not like the black and white striped barber pole. After some discussion by Council, Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal made a motion to approve the three variance requests in accordance with the findings in the staff memorandum dated October 18, 1989. John Slevin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-3, with Tom Steinberg, Eric Affeldt, and Merv Lapin opposing. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal and John Slevin explained to staff that Council should be informed of something like this -2- ~: design affecting a large area. Something like the flags, pole, and scale of the '_ sign should be emphasized to Council in the Design Review Board report. Peter Patten and Kristan emphasized that the pole and flags had been previously approved by the DRB before the sign variance was considered. They also stated it would be inappropriate for the staff to decide which proposals have negative impacts and which proposals do not. It was also pointed out that three planners handle DRB requests. It is impossible for the planner who makes the DRB report to know about all the details of each proposal, particularly when a project is approved unanimously by the DRB. After some discussion, Kristan stated staff would try to be more sensitive to issues like this. Mike Cacioppo then asked for a reconsideration vote. Ron Phillips looked up the correct procedure in Roberts' Rules of Order, and to have the vote reconsidered would take a two-thirds vote. Mike Cacioppo then made a motion that the previous question be reconsidered, which Merv Lapin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion failed 4-3, with John Slevin, Kent Rose, and Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal opposing. The motion failed due to lack of a two-thirds vote for reconsideration. Under Citizen Participation, Ken Wilson thanked the Council, Ron Phillips, and the Town staff for the construction of the road by his house. He felt the Town did a great job, and the road was much better now. James Johnson requested that Evening Meeting minutes, transcripts, or tapes be available at the Public Library for review. Mayor Rose replied that copies of the minutes would be made available at the Library. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- P~ _w -- -MINUTES -- - VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 1989 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, November 21, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Affeldt Michael Cacioppo Merv Lapin Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: None Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Mike Cacioppo was not present at the time the meeting began. The first order of business was Resolution No. 62, Series of 1989, recognizing and congratulating Red Sandstone Elementary School for winning the 1989 State Champion physical fitness award. Ann Sanders and Firooz Zadeh accepted the resolution on behalf of the children, and thanked the Council for recognizing the students. Mike Cacioppo arrived. A motion was made by Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal to approve the resolution. The motion was seconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item was Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1989, second reading, regarding sales tax revenue bonds for the parking structure expansion and renovation. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Joe Barrows (representing Steve Jeffers), of Kirchner Moore, and Dee Wisor, of Sherman & Howard, remarked on a few changes made in the ordinance since first reading, and why. They distributed revised copies of the ordinance with the noted changes. They also commented on the bond ratings and a .rate change, and then answered questions of Council. Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve the ordinance with the changes presented by Dee Wisor. John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Item three was Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1989, second reading, establishing a program of investments to provide for the payment of the Town's outstanding bonds. Mayor Rose read the full title. Dee Wisor distributed updated copies of the ordinance with the exact amounts filled in. Joe Barrows and Dee then answered questions of Council. After some discussion, Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve the ordinance with the changes as presented by Dee Wisor. The motion was seconded by Merv Lapin. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next order of business was a Consent Agenda of the following items: A. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Special Development District No. 6 converting condominium unit no. 30 from commercial to residential. B. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Title 17 to provide a definition for single family subdivisions. C. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Section 18.24.020 by adding "Commercial Ski Storage." D. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Chapter 2.20 by adding an application fee for temporary liquor licenses. -- - E. -Ordinance No. 28, Series of-1989;- second reading, amending Chapter 16.22 regulating signs in the Arterial Business District and Commercial Core III zone district. Mayor Rose read the full title of each. Joe Macy, of Vail Associates, Inc., stated he had a problem with Ordinance No. 28, and asked Council to have this item withdrawn from the Consent Agenda and tabled to a later date. Merv Lapin had a question regarding Ordinance No. 25, and asked to have it withdrawn from the Consent Agenda, also. Merv Lapin then made a motion to approve Ordinances 24, 26, and 27 on the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, second reading, was then discussed. Merv Lapin asked to have the ordinance clarif ied. Peter Patten tried to clarify the subdivision issue and explained just what the ordinance would do. Mayor Rose interrupted the meeting at this point to announce the outcome of the municipal election. He stated that Peggy Osterfoss, Rob Levine, and Jim Gibson were elected for four year terms, and Lynn Fritzlen was elected for a two year term. A ten minute break followed. Discussion regarding Ordinance No. 25 continued. Larry Eskwith gave further clarification. Merv Lapin then made a motion to approve the ordinance on second reading, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, was next. Joe Macy read the paragraph he objected to - page 3, Section 4. He gave a hypothetical case of a potential problem as he saw it. He felt it was unfair that a new business technically would not be allowed a sign if the building did not have an approved sign program. Larry Eskwith explained the sarne language was used as was used for signage in the Commercial Core III sign code. Bruce Allen remarked the problem Joe was talking about was not hypothetical, but a real problem which existed currently. Kristan Pritz explained the reasoning for the paragraph's inclusion in the ordinance. She stated that sign programs were required in CC3 to try and develop a comprehensive approach to signage for the large "shopping mall" type buildings in West Vail. Merv Lapin discussed tabling the ordinance for two weeks so the staff could work on rewording. There was some discussion regarding the problems. Eric Affeldt made a motion to table the ordinance until the next Evening Meeting December 5, which Mike Cacioppo seconded. Eric commented he agreed with Merv, that if something was in the Code we did not enforce, either enforce it or get rid of it; there was no reason to leave something on the books if we were not going to enforce it. Bruce was told to contact Kristan with his concerns. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The fourth item on the agenda was the sign variance request for the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom located in the Inn at Vail (Applicant: Jim Wilson). Larry Eskwith gave chronological background information up to the current date. He stated that the applicant had never appealed the Design Review Board decision on the design of the awning, so there was no basis for the applicant to be before the Council tonight. Mayor Rose asked how things got to this point, to which Larry replied he had just looked at the staff memorandum for the first time today. Peter Patten added that they had found the error today at 5:00 p.m. Peter then reviewed the Design Review Board's actions up to this point. After some discussion regarding problems and options, Tom Steinberg made a motion to table the item until the project was reviewed by the DRB and the applicant appeals the DRB decision on the design of the signage. Eric Affeldt seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Under Citizen Participation, Mike Cacioppo requested to continue receiving check registers. He stated he would pay for the copies, and submit a check on a monthly basis. Tom Steinberg asked if the problem regarding the Villa Cortina was being addressed. Ron Phillips stated it would be. Peter Patten remarked it was an old problem. Mayor Rose asked that if all business was concluded, he would like the Council to move into an Executive Session at this time to discuss a continuing land negotiation. -2- There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. ~- Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman -3- A ..f -~ - - -ORDINANCE N0. 28- -- - - "-_ Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16.22 SO THAT CHAPTER 16.22 REGULATES SIGNS IN THE ARTERIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE DISTRICT OF THE TOWN OF VAIL (ABD) AS WELL AS THE COMMERCIAL CORE III ZONE DISTRICT (CC3). WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail wishes to provide sign categories for the Arterial Business Zone District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: Section 1. The title of Chapter 16.22 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended to read Sign Categories for CC3 Zone District and ABD Zone Districts. Section 2. Section 16.22.010 designated is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.010 A. This chapter concerns those types of permanent and temporary signs requiring a sign application permit under the provisions o~f this title for property within the CC3 and ABD zone districts. This chapter further includes the purpose of each sign type, size, height, number, location, design, and landscaping requirements, and special provisions for each type of sign. B. The following is a listing of sign categories permitted in the CC3 and ABD under the provisions of this title: 1. Building identification signs; 2. Display boxes; 3. Flags, pennants, banners, and bunting; 4. Murals and supergraphics; 5. Political signs; 6. Projecting and hanging signs, arcades; 7. Projecting and hanging signs, individual businesses within a multi-tenant building; 8. Projecting and hanging signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building; 9. Sign programs; 10. Public information signs; 11. Temporary site development signs; .. 12-~-Traffic control signs-for private property; -- - ~- 13. Wall signs, arcade; 14. Wall signs, individual businesses within a multi-tenant building; 15. Wall signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building; 16. Wall signs, single business use; 17. Window signs. C. A business or organization within CC3 and/or ABD is permitted the following number of signs provided the provisions of each category are met: 1. An individual business with a multi-tenant building may have the following signs: a. A display box; b. A projecting and hanging sign or a wall-mounted sign; c. Traffic control signs; d. Window signs; e. Other temporary signs as permitted in the provisions of this Code; f. Space within a joint directory .sign for the building. 2. An individual business which is the sole occupant within a building may have the following signs: a. A display box; b. A wall sign or a free standing sign; c. Traffic control signs; d. Window signs; e. Other temporary signs as permitted in the provisions of this Code; D. Following in Section 16.22.020 through 16.22.160 is a listing by sign types of the requirements under this Section. Section 3. Section 16.22.015 Building Identification Signs, paragraph C, is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.015 BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNS C. Height; wall-mounted building identification signs: No part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five (25) feet from existing grade or the plate line of a building, whichever is less; Free standing building identification signs: -2- No part of the sign shall extend above eight (8) feet from existing ~- grade; Section 4. Section 16.22.100 Sign Program, paragraph I(1), is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.100 SIGN PROGRAM I. 1. At the time that any sign on a building located within Commercial Core III or Arterial Business District is removed, changed, or altered in any way, a sign program for that particular building is encouraged to be submitted to the Design Review Board prior to the erection of any new sign on the building. Section 5. Section 16.22.100 I(4) is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.100 I. 4. In the case where a building located within CC3 or ABD has a business frontage which is not adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads, but has calculable frontage which is located along a pedestrian way at the end of a building adjacent to the interior of CC3 or ABD and has direct access or display area along that pedestrian way, the provisions applicable shall be the same as for a business fronting on an arcade, subject to the approval of the Design Review Board. Section 6. Section 16.22.100 I(4)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.100 I. 4. b. This provision is not applicable to businesses with frontage adjacent to exterior boundaries of CC3 or ABD other than the North and South Frontage Roads. Section 7. Section 16.22.110, paragraph A, is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.110 A. Purpose, to indicate or identify a development of ,real property under construction in CC3 or ABD. Section 8. Section 16.22.120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.120 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY Traffic control signs for CC3 or ABD shall be regulated as follows: A. Purpose, to relieve vehicular and pedestrian traffic congestion and promote the safe and expedient flow and parking of traffic on private property; -3- -- - -B. -~Si-ze; al-1 vehicular traffic-control signs shall not exceed one square foot, -_ except multi-purpose signs, which shall not exceed four square feet. All pedestrian traffic control signs shall not exceed one square foot, except multi-purpose signs, which shall not exceed four square feet, subject to the approval of the design review board; C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above six feet from existing grade; D. Number, subject to the approval of the design review board; E. Location shall be determined by design review board, with a letter of approval from the town engineer for any sign placed adjacent to a public street or way; F. Design, subject to the approval of the design review board; G. Lighting, indirect, at the discretion of the design review board; H. Landscaping at discretion of design review board; I. Special provisions shall be as follows: 1. May be either free-standing or wall-mounted, with same size requirements; 2. No individual sign will be approved unless it conforms to an overall sign program for the entire building, submitted by the applicant; 3. No sign shall contain any advertising, but may identify the owner by name; 4. If a "no parking" sign (as furnished by the town) is used, there may be no other sign for the same purpose. Section 9. Section 16.22.140, paragraph E, shall be amended as follows: 16.22.140 E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall of the individual business or organization, adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads, subject to the approval of the Design Review Board; . Section 10. Section 16.22.140, paragraph H(3), is here amended to read as follows: 16.22.140 H. 3. An individual business with no calculable frontage along the North or South Frontage Roads, or with a basement or second floor entrance, may have one (1) sign with a maximum area of five (5) square feet in a location approved by the -4- Design Review Board or designated-in-a specific sign program for the building in -"= which the business or organization is located. Sactinn 11_ Section 16.22.150, paragraph E, is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.22.150 E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads subject to the approval of the Design Review Board. Section 12. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Cor~inn 1Z The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 14. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this 7th day of November 1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 7th day of November 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 7th day of November 1989• Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -5- .~ ~ .._ --- ----- -INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON-SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED "- this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -6- TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 30, 1989 SUBJECT: Bed and Breakfast Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989 At their November 13, 1989 meeting, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval of the new ordinance regulating Bed and Breakfasts. The Planning and Environmental Commission set a deadline for Bed and Breakfasts to receive a Conditional Use Permit of 6 months after ordinance adoption (Section 18); added Single Family and Two Family to the Special Development District Section (Section 15) and changed the word "accommodation unit" to "bedroom" in Section 17 B(1). They also incorporated the revisions as discussed with Council at the September 12, 1989 worksession. (See attached November 13 memo to PEC). We feel that the proposed ordinance incorporates all of the concerns the Council and Planning and Environmental Commission have expressed. TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 13, 1989 SUBJECT: Bed and Breakfast Regulations I. BACKGROUND On September 12, 1989, the Town Council and Planning Commission held a joint worksession with the planning staff to come to a consensus on the final direction of Bed and Breakfast regulations. A number of issues that had previously troubled the Town Council were resolved at this meeting. There was a consensus that there should be regulations regarding Bed and Breakfasts, that a Bed and Breakfast use has characteristics differentiating it from short term rentals, and that neighbors and condominium associations should be required to approve in writing a Conditional Use Permit application for a Bed and Breakfast when common property is involved. It was also agreed at the September meeting that a parking requirement of 1 space for the first bedroom, plus one-half space for each additional bedroom, plus one space for the Bed and Breakfast proprietor was appropriate. Furthermore, there was general agreement that Multi-family zone districts were acceptable locations for Bed and Breakfasts as long as the parking requirements are met. It was emphasized that the parking proposed to meet the requirement must be reserved and designated for that condominium or townhouse only. Finally, the PEC and Town Council agreed that signage would be restricted to one residential name plate sign as currently allowed in all residential areas. This type of sign cannot contain any advertising and is restricted to one-half square foot per Single Family or Duplex structure or one- half square foot for each Multi-family unit. II. THE PROPOSAL Attached, please find a copy of formerly proposed Ordinance No. 31 of 1989 dealing with the regulation of Bed and Breakfasts. This is the ordinance that the Council rejected on second reading on March 21, 1989 to re-discuss the issue with the Planning Commission. I have made revisions to this ordinance as per the agreements reached at the September 12th joint worksession. As now proposed, the ordinance: o allows B&B's to be located in zone districts allowing multi- family dwelling units (Sections 4 - 15). o continues to require B&B's to receive a Conditional Use Permit. -~ o amends parking requirements as stated above (Sections 17 (B) 1) . o allows for a residential name plate sign only (Section 17(B)4). o requires the written approval of other property owners when a B&B proposes the use of property or facilities owned in common or jointly with other property owners (Section 17 (B) 5) . o provides a procedure for violations and Conditional Use Permit revocation (Section 17 (C)). III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While the staff continues to disagree that Bed and Breakfasts are appropriate in Multi-family zone districts, we feel it is imperative for the Town to adopt legislation allowing Bed and Breakfasts to legally operate in Vail. The staff is strongly in favor of Bed and Breakfasts as an efficient use of residential units in a resort community. Bed and Breakfasts often provide a high quality and low cost accommodation alternative in resort areas and we feel they can be a very positive addition to Vail's lodging community. However, we cannot endorse locating Bed and Breakfasts in higher density housing developments due to the potential negative impacts to surrounding owners as well as the general lack of ambiance these Bed and Breakfasts would tend to provide. Nevertheless, we recommend that the Planning and Environmental Commission recommend approval to the Council of the revisions to Ordinance No.2 Series of 1989, in an effort to adopt responsible regulations supporting Bed and Breakfasts in Vail. W ORDINANCE NO. 31 Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 18.58.310, SHORT TERM RENTAL ACCOMMODATION UNIT OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS UNDER CERTAIN PROVISIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND TO DEFINE BED AND BREAKFAST AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to allow bed and~breakfas~ operations under certain conditions and in certain locations within the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that .bed and breakfast operations operated under certain conditions provide high quality and desirable lodging appropriate for a resort community; and WHEREAS, policies within the Town of wail Land Use Plan support the provision of high quality lodging utilizing existing facilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental commission has reviewed and recommended changes to the zoning code to accommodate bed and breakfast uses as contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 18.10.030 Single Family (SFR) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: G. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 3. Section 18.13.030 Primary/Secondary (P/S) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: F. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 4. Section 18.14.030 Residential Cluster (R/C) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. 0. .~ Section 5. Section 18.16.030 Low Density Multiple Family (LDMF) District-- Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 6. Section 18.18.030 Medium Density Multi-Family (MDMS) District-- Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: L. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 7. Section 18.20.030 High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District-- Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: L. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 8. Section 18.22.030 Public Accommodation (PA) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: O. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 9. Section 18.24.060 Commercial Core I (CC1) District--Conditional Uses - Generally shall be amended to add the following: E. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 10. Section 18.26.040 Commercial Core II (CCII) District--Conditional Uses - Generally shall be amended to add the following: H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 11. Section 18.27.030 Commercial Core III j(CCIII) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: P. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. 2 Section 12. Section 18.28.040 Commercial Service Center (CSC) District-- Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: K. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 13. Section 18.29.030 (A) Arterial Business District (ABD)--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 14. Section 18.39.050 (A) Ski Base/Recreation District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: 12 BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 15. Chapter 18.40 Special Development District of the Vail Municipal code shall be amended to add Section 18.40.160 as follows: Section 18.40.160 Bed and Breakfast--Conditional Use Permit ANY SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONTAINING MULTI-FAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY OR TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR A BED AND BREAKFAST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 18.60 AND AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 16. Section 18.09.030 Hillside Residential (HR) District--Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following: E. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310. Section 17. Section 18.58.310 Short Term Rental Accommodation Unit shall be repealed and re-enacted as follows: Section 18.58.310 BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS A. DEFINITION BED AND BREAKFAST MEANS A BUSINESS WHICH ACCOMMODATES GUESTS IN A DWELLING UNIT IN WHICH THE BED AND BREAKFAST PROPRIETOR LIVES ON THE PREMISES AND IS IN RESIDENCE DURING THE BED AND BREAKFAST USE. A BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATION MAY SHORT TERM 3 _. ~ ~. RENT SEPARATELY UP TO 3 BEDROOMS OR A MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 900 SQUARE FEET OF THE DWELLING UNIT. BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS SHALL ONLY BE PERMITTED TO ACCOMMODATE A FAMILY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18.04.110. B. LOCATION AND CRITERIA BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THOSE ZONE DISTRICTS AS SPECIFIED IN TITLE 18 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE. IF PERMITTED AS A CONDITIONAL USE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 18.60 OF THIS CODE, BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. OFF STREET PARKING SHALL BE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS: 1 SPACE FOR THE OWNER/PROPRIETOR PLUS 1 SPACE FOR THE FIRST BEDROOM RENTED PLUS 1/2 SPACE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL BEDROOM RENTED. 2. ENCLOSED TRASH FACILITIES AND REGULAR GARBAGE REMOVAL SERVICE SHALL BE PROVIDED. 3. REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL PARKING IS STRONGLY DISCOURAGED. 4. EACH BED AND BREAKFAST SHALL BE ALLOWED ONE RESIDENTIAL NAMEPLATE SIGN AS DEFINED AND REGULATED BY THE TOWN OF VAIL SIGN CODE. 5. IF A BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATION SHALL USE PROPERTY OR FACILITIES OWNED IN COMMON OR JOINTLY WITH OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS SUCH AS PARKING SPACES OR A DRIVEWAY IN DUPLEX SUBDIVISION, BY WAY OR EXAMPLE AND NOT LIMITATION, THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNER, OWNERS, OR APPLICABLE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. C. VIOLATION IF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DETERMINES THAT THE PROVISION OF THIS SECTION 18.58.310 OR ANY CONDITION OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ARE BEING VIOLATED, HE SHALL GIVE NOTICE OR REVOCATION TO THE BED AND BREAKFAST PERMITTEE IN WRITING DESCRIBING IN REASONABLE DETAIL THE VIOLATION ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED OR TO EXIST AND SHALL SERVE 4 .~ THE NOTICE ON THE PERMITTEE IN PERSON OR BY FIRST CLASS MAIL AT THE ADDRESS LISTED IN THE APPLICATION FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE PERMITTEE DISAGREES WITH THE DETERMINATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS, HE MAY APPEAL SUCH DETERMINATION BY FILING A WRITTEN NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING COMMISSION NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE NOTICE OF REVOCATION. AT SAID HEARING THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHALL BE WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO PROVE THE NOTICE OF REVOCATION BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. AFTER THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL CONFIRM OR REVERSE THE NOTICE OR VIOLATION ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. IF ANY PERMITTEE FAILS TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THE NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED A FINAL ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVOKING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Section 18. Compliance It shall be unlawful for a bed and breakfast operation to do business without a conditional use permit from the Planning and Environmental Commission after June 12, 1989 or to operate in violation of any of the provisions of the Vail Municipal Code. Section 19. Discontinuance Any bed and breakfast operation which is discontinued for a period of twelve months, regardless of any intent to resume operation of use, shall not be resumed thereafter, and any future use of the site or structures thereon shall conform with the provisions of this title. Section 20. The Town Council, the applicant, adjacent property owner or the Town Manager, may appeal/call up to the Town Council for review any decision made by the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding a Conditional Use Permit for Bed and Breakfast as per Section 18.60.070. Section 21. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall 5 ~i not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 22. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 23. The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and re-enacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of 1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk 6 ORDINANCE NO. 32 - - ~- Series of 1989 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, BOOTH CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND, COMMUNITIES FOR DRUG-FREE EAGLE VALLEY FUND, SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT FUND, VAIL MARKETING FUND, LIONSHEAD MALL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUND,AND THE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, OF THE 1989 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1989 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1988, adopting the 1989 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, The Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, that: Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations for the 1989 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: -1- FUND AMOUNT General Fund $1,660,000 Special Parking Assessment Fund 500,000 Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 3,158,723 Vail Marketing Fund 23,500 Communities for Drug-free Eagle County Fund 11,000 Booth Creek Local Improvement District Fund 373,700 Lionshead Mall Assessment District Fund 21,000 $5,747,923 INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS 5th day of December 1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the 5th day of December , 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail Colorado. Ordered published in full this 1989. day of Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1989. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 21, 1989 SUBJ: Sign variance request for the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom, located in the Inn at West Vail Applicant: The Finishing Touch I. THE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 16.22.070(C) of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. This section of the code addresses the allowable height of projecting and hanging signs, and in fact limits the allowable height to fifteen feet above existing grade. The existing awning and associated signage is approximately 25 feet off the ground and thus requires a height variance of 10 feet. II. BACKGROUND ON REQUEST In early July, the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom moved into a new lease space in the Inn at Vail, formerly the Raintree Inn, and erected a sign and awning without Town of Vail approval. A decision was made by the Town of Vail to allow the applicant to maintain the existing awning while he submitted for a sign variance. The original request to the Design Review Board was a request to receive approval for the existing awning as well as two other proposed signs. On July 5, 1989, the Design Review Board heard a sign variance request from the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom. At that time, the application entailed a variance request from three sections of the Town of Vail Sign Code: Section 16.22.070 B. Size Section 16.22.070 C. Height Section 16.22.070 D. Number of signs At that meeting, and after a lengthy discussion, the applicant tabled the request in order to further review and amend the application. After several meetings with the Design Review Board and the staff, the applicant has now decided to eliminate the directional sign and the identification sign adjacent to the retail entrance, and limit the request for a variance to the allowable sign height. The amended application includes only one 20 square foot sign, located 25 feet above grade on the existing awning. III. FINDINGS AND STAFF RESPONSES Before the Board acts on a variance application, the applicant must prove physical hardship and the Board must find that, A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the adjacent right-of-way which would substantially restrict the effectiveness of the sign in question; provided, however, that such special circumstances or conditions are unique to the particular business or enterprise to which the applicant desires to draw attention and do not apply generally to all businesses or enterprises. Staff Response The staff cannot support the degree of variance which is being requested in this particular application. Although the applicant has reduced the degree of variance by eliminating the directional and identificaiton signs originally proposed adjacent to the retail entrance, the main problem the staff has had with this application is the existing awning. As we also stated in the July 5, 1989 memo, we feel the size and height of the awning requested along the North Frontage Road is grossly in excess of what is required for this business and does in fact draw undue attention to itself. The staff feels that both the awning and the square footage of sign that is displayed along the North Frontage Road is excessive and should be reduced in size. B. That special circumstances were not created by the applicant or anyone in privy to the applicant. Staff Response• The main entrance to this retail space is located on the west side of the building. Although this is a difficult location for access off of the North Frontage Road, the staff does not believe that this warrants a height variance to the degree proposed by the applicant. The staff previously agreed to support a sign location on the west side of the south wall to mitigate the entrance location. However, the applicant has withdrawn that request. C. That the granting of the variance will be in general harmony with the purpose of this title and will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinit to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general. Staff Response° The staff feels that this request goes beyond the intent of the Sign Code for the Commercial Core III area. The Town Council, in the past, has granted several variances in the West Vail area, and while the staff believes that some variance may be appropriate for this business, we feel that the applicant has taken the proposed amendments to his original application in the wrong direction. The height and the number of signs are two of the most important criteria in the Sign Code. While the applicant has eliminated the need for variance in the number of signs, he is still requesting a substantial variance in height. We feel that as a first floor retail store with additional second floor footage, we would be setting a dangerous precedent to support a height variance of this magnitude in the Commercial Core III area. D. The variance applied for does not depart from the provisions of this title any more than is required to identify the applicant's business or use Staff Response: We feel that the existing awning displayed across the front of this building goes well beyond the provisions of this title and is higher and larger than what the staff believes would be required to identify the applicant's business. As we have stated in our previous memorandum, we feel that in order for the staff to be able to support a variance for this location, the sign on the south elevation of the building must be reduced in size and height. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Community Development Department recommends denial of this proposed variance. We feel that the height of the proposed sign along the North Frontage Road grossly exceeds what is required to identify this business, that the sign calls undue attention to itself, and that the existing hardship is not adequate to support a variance of this degree from the Town of Vail Sign Code. * See attached letter for the Design Review Board's action at their October 18, 1989 public hearing. * See attached letter for the Design Review Board's action at their November 29, 1989 public hearing. tuwo of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 (303)479-2139 Mr. Jim Wilson, Owner Finishing Touch 2211 North Frontage Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. Wilson, office of community development At their public hearing of October 18, 1989, the Town of Vail Design Review Board, by a vote of 4-l, recommended denial of your requested sign variance. The Design Review Board made findings consistent with sections III - A, B, C, and D of the October 18, 1989 staff memorandum. This recommendation will be presented to the Vail Town Council at their November 7, 1989 evening meeting. The Design Review Board also reviewed the design of your proposed "awning" and by a vote of 5-0 unanimously denied the request. The Board found that your proposal was not consistent with Section 16.16.020 of the Town's Sign Code - Not Dominating - "The sign should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself." If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, ~ ~~~ Mike Mollica Town Planner xc: Peter Patten Larry Eskwith Bruce Allen town o 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 (303) 479-2139 Nov. 29, 1989 Mr. Jim Wilson, Owner Finishing Touch 2211 N. Frontage Rd. Vail, Colo. 81657 Dear Mr. Wilson, office of community development At their public hearing of November 29, 1989, the Town of`Vail Design Review Board, by a vote of 4-0, unanimously denied your request for design approval of your proposed awning and associated signage. The board found that the proposal was not consistent with Section 16.16.020 of the Town's Sign Code - Not Dominating - "The sign should not visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue attention to itself." For your convenience, please find attached the appeal procedure as outlined in the Town's zoning code, Section 18.54.090. If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me at 479- 2138. - Sincerely, ®~~ Mike Mollica Planner II MM: as cc: Peter Patten John Dunn Bruce Allen LAW OFFICES COSGRIFF, DUNN &ABPLANALP A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JOHN W. DUNN PETER COSGRIFF ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN TIMOTHY H. BERRY TAM RA B. NOTTINGHAM VAIL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SUITE 300 P. O. Box 2299 VAIL, COLORADO 81658 TELEPHONE: (3031 476-7552 TE LECOPIER: (303) 476-4765 IN LEADVI LLE~ COSGRIFF, DUNN b BERRY P. O• BOX II LEADVILLE,COLO RADO 80461 (7191 486-1885 Iv'ovember 30, 1989 Mr. Mike Mollica Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mike: Re: The Finishing Touch of Vail, Inc. The purpose of this letter is to appeal to the Town Council the adverse decision of the Design Review Board on November 29, 1989, relating to the design of The Finishing Touch Sign. Yours very truly, JWD:kem cc: Ms. Pam Brandmeyer Mr. James R. Wilson COSGRIFF, DUNN & ABPLANALP John W. Dunn THE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION IS DUNN 6 ABPLANALP, P. C. IN VAIL. ORIENTATION SCHEDULE FOR COUNCIL Tuesday, November 28 - Council Organizational Meeting Revised 11/30/89 Monday, December 4 - Mayor's Breakfast 7:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers Tuesday, December 5 - Work Session, Legal Orientation Home Rule, Charter Review, Ordinances, Relationship between Council its appointed Boards, Discussion regarding how meetings are run/Litigation Update in Executive Session - Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, December 12 - Work Session, Five Year Budget/Investment Policy/Employee Compensation Orientation Tuesday, December 19 - Work Session, Community Development/Public Works/Library Orientation Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, December 26 - Work Session, Police/Fire Orientation Tuesday, January 2 - Work Session - Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, January 9 - Tour of Vail Mountain Tuesday, January 16 - Work Session - Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m. Saturday, January 20 - Colorado Municipal League New Councilmember Orientation Seminar (info will be coming out mid-Dec.) Sheraton Lakewood Tuesday, January 23 - Work Session Tuesday, January 30 - Goal Setting Session - Prioritize Land Purchase Issues ALL DAY MEETING in off-site hotel conference room Unless noted otherwise above, all Work Sessions will be held in the Council Chambers, beginning at 2:00 p.m. ,~ ,y ., WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 12/01/89 Page 1 TOPIC UESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SO IONS 8/1 BANNER POLES IN THE VILLAGE AND LIONSHEAD (request: Slevin) 8/1 STREET ENTERTAINMENT 8/8 UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FOR ARTERIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 8/8 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION (request: Lapin) I 8/15 VUCWD/TOV LAND CONTRACT 8/15 NO SMOKING ORDINANCE 9/5 CALL UP PROCEDURE FOR PEC AND DRB DECISIONS (request: Steinberg) 10/17,VVF FINANCIAL REPORT 11/7 SURVEY CREW BUDGET ITEM (request: Steinberg/Rose) 11/14'~PRE-QUALIFYING CONTRACTORS FOR VTRC (request: Rose) I PETER: Arrange location and placement of permanent banner poles at any location other than Pepi's and in Lionshead. Have asked Ampersand for design for Lionshead east entry. Will explore with Ampersand alternative banner pole locations in Village. Peter checked with Ampersand, and they are working on it. Village issue will be included in the Village Streetscape Plan. Answer on Lionshead by Dec. 22. PAM: No more rock 'n roll. Perhaps no more jazz? KRISTAN: Provide costs to individuals to convert to underground. Provide firm number for TOV's portion by budget time. Inventory all above- ground wiring. LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for annexation. RON: Contract in final stages of negotiation. LARRY/SUSAN: Organize study group to examine voluntary options. LARRY: Work out wording to disallow the call up procedure for PEC and DRB decisions to be allowed without consensus. RON: Request financial report from VUF. STAN/STEVE: Bring back survey crew issue before hiring. RON/STAN/LARRY: Develop procedure through interview and review process rather than deal with time restrictions caused by competitive bid process, based on profit percentages, open books, etc. Requires vote by Council to approve. Review meeting held September 20. Business survey will be developed by Dec. 15. Received letter from New Electric detailing costs for each property. Community Development will write letters to property owners for their response. Council will discuss when we have a response. Peter will report on results of follow-up on Dec. 8. Annexation map is being produced. Susan has completed research and submitted updated plats to Dan Corcoran. Discuss annexing Interstate. Larry will call Dan Corcoran on Dec. 1. Larry and Jim Collins are working on contract. Group to include Safeway and other retail outlets in their scrutiny. Draft ordinance for public places other than restaurants by Jan. 23. Resolution is being developed. Larry and Peter will have a solution by Dec. 15. Written. Audit is just being completed. Will discuss in December. Staff discussion on Dec. 4. Will be discussed with Council on Dec. 19. Included in architect's scope of services. 4 TOPIC 11/14 SALES TAX FOR FUND RAISING EVENTS FOR NON-PROFIT ENTITIES 11/28 LIONSHEAD REZONING/PARKING (request: Lapin) 11/28 VAIL COMMUNITY TELEVISION GROUP APPOINTMENT 11/28 BERRY CREEK SITE STUDY 12/1 REPLACE ALPINE STANDARD FLAGS AND REPAIR POLES WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS STEUE/DANI: Bring back to Council for more discussion. PETER/LARRY: Pursue rezoning to disallow use of parking structure in lieu of providing on-site parking (i.e., L'Ostello, formerly the Enzian). RON: Contact group about the TOV's ability to advertise for volunteers/applicants who can then be appointed by Council. RON: Obtain written proposal from Peter Jamar covering scope of services - by 12/5/89. STAN: Arrange for replacement of flags and repair of poles. FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS Will be discussed December 12. 12/01/89 Page 2 To be presented at first Council meeting in February. In Council packets. Public Works will take care of the problem. o~~~r~ 595 East' VaiC Va[fe~ ~riv~-- NOVEMBER 24, 1989 REC'~ NOV 2 9 egg Vaif, Co[orac[o 81657 (303) 47b-5651 Fax (303) 47b-4g82 MR. RON PHII.LIPS TOWN MANAGER THE TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD WEST MAIL, CO 81657 DEAR RON: I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT A PROFESSIONAL FIRE DEPARTMENT WE HAVE IN VAIL. AS YOU KNOW WE HAD A FIRE AT MANOR VAIL ON TUESDAY, AND DICK DURAN AND HIS CREW RESPONDED IN A TIMELY AND PROFESSIONAL MANNER. THEY HAD THE FIRE UNDER CONTROL IN A VERY SHORT PERIOD OF TIlVIE. DUE TO THEIR DII.IGENCE, WE SUSTAINED A MINIMUM OF DAMAGE TO THE PREMISES AND TO THE UNITS DIRECTLY ABOVE THE FIRE AREA. THE VAIL COMMUNITY IS FORTUNATE TO HAVE SUCH AN EXCELLENT FIRE DEPARTMENT. PLEASE EXTEND MY PERSONAL THANKS, AS WELL AS THE i~~~PVr'~ yr hI.L Or' C1:,~R G`i~:'I~TEI'~S FOR Tr~.ASSrS'I'~~PdCE :~~ .Fr'EIVEL. SINCERELY, MANOR VAIL CONDOMIIVIUIVI ASSOCIATION JAC RUSH, CHA GING AGENT r~ Town of Avon P. O. Box 975, Avon, CO 81620 (303) 949-4280 RECD iVOV 2 9 1989 November 28, 1989 Dear TV Translator Committee Member: Eagle Valley TV Translator Committee Chairman, Jerry Davis recently sent a letter to the Eagle County Commissioners requesting a meeting to discuss the matter of a special election regarding TV Translators. Enclosed is a copy of that letter. This letter is notification that a meeting with the Eagle County Commissioners has been scheduled for 2:00 P.P~., Tuesday, December 19, 1989, to discuss this matter. ALL TV Committee members are urged to attend this meeting if at all possible. Please, do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Norman !food Secretary/Treasurer Eagle Valley TV Translator Committee N41/cp encl: Copy/File .v L. .- Town o4 Avon P. O. Box 975, Avon, CO 61620 (303) 949-4250 November 14, 1989 Board of County Commissioners Eagle County P.O. Box 850 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Re: Translator Television Dear Commissionerso A great deal of time, energy, and money hav_e_ been_spent _on_._ _ _ the issue of television-translator services to residents of eagle County. i-n the- past three ~to -.four .years, =and the - issue has yet to.be..resolved. - The Eagle County Television Committee .attempted to create a special district to provide broadcast television.. This effort to create the district was denied by District Court on the basis that such a district can not duplicate services that are being provided in an entity included in the district. This committee represents a majority of citizens, and .the County. Its membership includes representatives from the Towns of Eagle, Gypsum, Avon, Vail, Minturn and Red Cliff, and a number of metro districts. The committee Baas supported financially by the governments represented, including Eagle County, and by many private contributions. The members have. worked long and hard in the past years. We have raised funds for legal services, and extensive engineering studies which will provide reliable services to most of the county. We engaged a financial expert so the program for translator television to the residents of the county would be on a sound fiscal basis. ~~ °• Board of County Commissioners Translator Television page 2 Under lying all this work was a belief by the committee members that there was a need for broadcast television in the community. We received much support in spirit by many residents who indicated that translator television was important because many of the residents cannot afford the cost of satellite dishes or the expense of ever increasing rates of cable service. We still believe there is a need for alternate . television services. The residents of Eagle County have not had the opportunity to express their desires and concerns on this matter. Except, in the public vote in Vail, where the public voted in favor of translator television by a two to one margin. The Colorado Legislature recognized the need to provide broadcast (translator) television back in the 60's and adopted statutes: Article 7, Part 1, CRS, authorized the county to acquire, own, sell, create and operate televis_ion_.-relay=and_translator facilities (29-7-1~1, CRS.) - = 29-7-101, CRS,-authorizes the county to receive funds from private .~ or public sources for-the purpose of constructing and operating - television transmission_and relay .booster facilities. 29-7-106, CRS, exempts a tax levy for the purpose of television relay and translator facilities from tax limitations prescribed for the county. In brief, the county has the authority to establish and operate a translator television system, tax for the service of that system, and this tax will not affect the general fund as budgeted for the county. - L Board of County Commissioners ~~ Translator Television page 3 Our proposal is~: The county conduct a special election: with this question on the ballota "Shall the county establish a translator television system for the residents of Eagle County and increase the mill levy by .-6 mills to provide funding for this service ?" The results of this election would: 1. If the vote is "no" then the issue is dead and put to rest. 2. If the vote is "yes" then the county creates the television translator system which should be operated by a committee appointed by the Commissioners. - The crea~iori of this system would serve the majority of the - resi__dents.of~the county~as soon as the system is in place, ~ - -- and eventually it could serve all of the residents. Additionally, the money collected from~•Basalt-E1 Jebel could be used to pay Garfield County for the services they are supplying those residents. - The Commissioners are authorized to conduct an election as an advisory vote, and as a budget vote to exceed the 5.5 limitation. With Commissioners cooperation, the election can be called and this matter can be resolved within 60 days. We appreciate .the Commissioners consideration in this matter and urge then to move as quickly as possible. We request a ~^eeting with the Coru~-issioners at the earliest possible time to discuss this matter and will call in a few days to confirm a date. Sincer , J rry`Davis, Chairman Eagle Valley T.V. Translator System PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, I NC. PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH November 29, 1989 Kevin Lindahl Eagle County Attorney Eagle, Colorado 81631 Dear Kevin: The purpose of this letter is to confirm our agreement to provide Professional Services in relation to the purchase and development of. the Berry Creek Fifth Filing and the Miller Ranch as a county-wide recreational complex. SCOPE OF SERVICES: As agreed to on November 24 we shall provide the following services: 1. Revise the conceptual plans previously prepared for the site and indicate potential alternative plans for a Phase One development within the Berry Creek Fifth Filing property. 2. Meet with the Task Force to review the Phase One alternatives and select a preferred concept. 3. Upon selection of a preferred concept plan for Phase One we shall prepare cost estimates for the development of Phase One. These cost estimates will include: a. Land purchase price for. both the Berry Creek Fifth Filing and Miller Ranch. b. Estimated costs of the provision of infrastructure including roads, water, sewer, electric service, gas service, etc. c. Estimated costs of detailed engineering, planning, legal and architectural fees. Suite 308, Vail National Bank Building 108 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ (303) 476-7154 KPV1n 'Lindahl -.. _..__...__ __...._.._-- -------._-- _ Eagle County Attorney November 29, 1989 Page 2 d. Estimated cost of facilities to be provided within Phase One. e. Estimated operational costs for the facilities to be' operated within Phase One. 4. Upon completion of the concept plan and estimated costs we shall assist Eagle County and the Task Force in conducting public meetings to present the plan and cost estimates to the general public. It is anticipated that three public meetings will be held: one in Avon, one in Eagle, and one in El Jebel. A slide presentation will be prepared for review at the public meetings in order to convey the information to the public. SCHEDULE° The following schedule is anticipated at this time: 1. Revise Plans 2. Meet with Task Force 3. Prepare Cost Estimates 4. Public Meetings FEE° Nov. 27 - Dec. 1 Dec. 1 Dec. 1 - 22 Jan. 1 - 15 The total fee for the above described services shall be a maximum of $7,500.00 plus expenses estimated at $500.00. Fees and expenses shall be billed in accordance with the attached rate and expense schedule. If the above meets with your approval please sign where indicated below and return one copy for my files. Please let me know if you have any questions. As we discussed I anticipate utilizing the staff°s of the three governmental entities plus the VMRD staff to assist as much as possible in the preparation of estimated development and operational costs. Sincer~y, ter Ja~ar, AICP PJ:ne AGREED AND ACCEPTED: Kevin Lindahl Date ~, PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH August 1, 1989 RATE AND EXPENSE SCHEDULE RATE: Principal Planner/Designer Drafting/Graphics Clerical • Sub-Consultants REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: $75.00/hour $50.00/hour $35.00/hour $20.00/hour Passed through at sub-consultants regular rates Actual expenditures made by the employees of Peter Jamar Associates, Inc. for the Project are reimbursable at cost plus 10 percent for coordination and processing, and will be billed in addition to professional service fees. Examples of reimbursable expenses are transportation and living expenses while traveling in connection with the Project, long distance telephone calls, xerox copies, reproduction and printing costs, supplies, postage and photography. METHOD OF PAYMENTe Professional services are billed monthly at the above scheduled rates for hours of work performed on the Project. Payment is due 15 days following receipt of invoice. Invoices unpaid after 30 days are subject to a service charge, which is 1 1/2% per month, and all costs of collection including reasonable attorney°s fees. Peter Jamar Associates, Inc. reserves the right to suspend work on the Project if payment is not received within 45 days from invoice date. Suite 308, Vail National Bank l3uilding 108 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ (303) 476-7154 TO: The Art in Public Places Board FROM: Kristan Pritz / Community Development Department DATE: November 28, 1989 RE: Upcoming Art in Public Places Board Meeting, December 4, 1989. Our next Art in Public Places Board Meeting will start at the Lionshead Parking Structure at the Vail Valley Arts Council Office. The office is located on the lower level of the structure (the corner closest to the ice arena - southeast). The site visit will begin at 8:30 a.m.. Randy Milhoan and Pam Story will discuss the idea for the Mural with the board. The meeting will be continued at the Small Conference Room in the Municipal Building. AGENDA DECEMBER 4, 1989 8:30 a.m.: Meet at Lionshead Parking Structure, Vail Valley Arts Council Office to review concept for a Public Art Project sponsored by the Vail Valley Arts Council. 9:00 a.m.: Small Conference Room 1. Approval of Minutes of November 20, 1989 AIPP Meeting. 2. Conceptual Review of the Vail Valley Arts Council Mural. 3. Discussion of Council support for the AIPP decision on Jim Hoy's "See or Ski Colorado Sculpture". 4. Update on Public Art Proposals. a. Bird of Paradise. b. Parking Structure Public Art Meeting. c. Post Office Meeting. d. 10th Mountain Division Sculpture. r .~~ Art in Public Places November 20, 1989 Minutes Present Sally Sheridan Jim Cotter Fitzhugh Scott Tom Steinberg Randy Milhoan Jamie McCluskie Laura Nash Pam Story Roselyne Swig Absent Kathy Warren Staff Present Kristan Pritz The Art in Public Places Board meeting began at 8:30 a.m. with a site visit to the Covered Bridge. The members met with the artist, Jim Hoy, to discuss his proposed sculpture for the site. At 9:00 a.m., the meeting reconvened at the Municipal Building. Pam Story requested that all of her public art information be sent to their home address at 3230 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, Colorado. Item No. 1 Approval of November 6, 1989 minutes. Tom Steinberg made a motion, seconded by Roselyne Swiq, to approve the November 6, 1989 minutes The motion passed unanimously. Item No. 2 Review of See or Ski Colorado Sculpture Artist• Jim Hoy Jim Hoy gave background on his career and interest in sculpture. He described his sculpture park project in Frazier, Colorado. He stated that the concept for See or Ski was 100% art, but also 1000 marketing for tourism. He explained that the piece was presented to the City of Denver for the new airport or Stapleton. Due to the fact that the new airport will take 5 years, he could not wait. He thought he would contact Vail first to see if they were interested in the proposal. He also contacted Vail Associates about the project. VA directed Jim to work with Kristan at the Town of Vail. Jim stated that if Vail accepted the piece, he would then present the proposal to Continental Airlines. He explained that no other community has seen the piece or been asked if they were interested in it. He also emphasized that there would be publicity in magazines on this project. s ~- - .. As the artist, he would want to retain the copyright. Kristan asked for a description of the construction for the piece. Jim stated that the piece would be made out of 3/8 inch aluminum. The aluminum would be sprayed with copper and then with brass. The brass would be wire brushed. The entire sculpture would be finished with epoxy to resist scuffing. He stated that the sculpture would not have a shiny look. Structurally, the piece can withstand people hanging off of the ski pole ends and arms of the skier. The base of the sculpture will be made of a material call "design cast." The core of the base would be Styrofoam. The sculpture itself has been designed to be placed on an aluminum platform. This allows the sculpture to be forklifted and moved. The base will also allow for protection from snow removal. After Jim finished with his presentation, the Board asked questions. Roselyne asked what relationship Continental Airlines has with Vail. Tom Steinberg responded that at this time, there was no relationship. Roselyne felt that due to fact that there was not a strong relationship between Vail and Continental, that the piece was not unique to Vail. Roselyne also asked about the copyright for the piece. She questioned whether Vail would be deriving any benefits from the copyright arrangement. Jim Hoy answered that prints of the sculpture could be reproduced with his permission and used as a means to pay back the donor of the artwork. Roselyne asked who would pay for maintenance and site preparation costs. Jim responded that he did not feel there would be any site preparation costs. The maintenance cost would be minimal and he was open to discussing the possibility of the artist or donor covering the maintenance cost. Jim Hoy felt that he should get some benefit from the reproductions or posters, due to the fact that he is creating sculpture for free. He is willing to work with Vail Associates and the Town on some type of a copyright agreement. Kristan asked that the Board comment on the sculpture in respect to the site and artwork criteria. Roselyne said that she wanted to discuss the site. She stated that she disagreed with Jim Hoy that when you exit from the Parking Structure, you do not have a strong image of where you are. Her opinion was that the Covered Bridge, Clock Tower, Fountain and landscaping give a very strong image of Vail. She felt this area was already very picturesque. Roselyne commented that the materials for the sculpture seemed foreign in the proposed location. She felt a decision should be made whether this space needed to be more open or less open or should stay. as it is. She expressed concern about the concept of site specific work versus placing an artwork on a site. She felt the Covered Bridge area was a site that seemed to warrant site specific artwork. Roselyne said that there are not many spaces available for art in the Town of Vail. She questioned whether to Town should consider having artists come in from the very beginning and develop their artwork so that it would be site specific. Tom Steinberg said the artwork needed to fit into the Alpine village. He felt the piece reminded him of a curio-shop type artwork. He stated this artwork is not appropriate for this site. The quality is lacking. Randy Milhoan stated that he had received comments from the public about the piece. The comments have not been favorable. Personally, Randy does not like the piece. Jim Cotter complemented Jim Hoy on his presentation. He appreciated Jim's efforts and ideas. Randy stated that it was not absolutely necessary to illustrate that Vail is a ski town by showing a skier. However, he was not necessarily opposed to the concept of a skier. Jim stated he liked the site specific approach. Sally Sheridan thought the committee needed to regroup and think about the site specific approach. She felt the sculpture crowded the site. The skier concept was too limiting for Vail. Kristan emphasized that comments should be related to the artwork and site criteria. Sally stated that she did not feel the proposal met the artwork criteria of quality and innovation, as well as compatibility with site. Roselyne questioned what would happen to the sculpture after ten years. Jim Hoy explained that he would like to be able to tell the art contributor that the piece would be placed for a minimum of ten years in Vail. Roselyne recommended not accepting the piece as it did not meet the following guidelines: Section IX. A. d. Relationship of proposed site to existing or future architectural features and to natural features g. Site design, including landscaping, drainage, grading, lighting and seating considerations Section IX. B. 1. Quality and Innovation The consideration of highest priority is the inherent artistic excellence and innovation of the artwork. 3. Compatibility With Site Works of art should be compatible in style, scale, material, form, and content with their surroundings, and should form an overall relationship with the site. ., ,~ Roselyne said she would like to see the committee consider a few important sites. The committee should pursue the opportunity for artwork. She felt the obvious concepts should be set aside such as fishing, skiing, hiking, etc. She felt the committee should look at the community in a different way. What are the people in Vail like? What kind of thinking do they represent? What image would Vail like to project? Vail artwork does not necessarily need to relate to specific activities in the community. Instead, the ideas of originality, creativity, movement, could be expressed through artwork. She felt some "blue-skying" was necessary to think about the big picture. She said she hated to mention specific artists, but gave examples of perhaps a sculpture by Calder that would be kinetic as well as stable. She questioned would this be an image for Vail. Jim Cotter stated that the first review was difficult. Randy Milhoan commented that sites for the Art in Public Places program are important and the Board needed to address them. A motion was made by Randy Milhoan and seconded by Laura Nash to disapprove the proposal per Sections IX, A, d and q, and IX, B, 1 and 3, of the Art In Public Places Guidelines. The vote was 8-1 to approve the motion. Jamie McCluskie voted against the motion He felt that the means used to set the piece in the site could make the proposal suitable for approval. The Board suggested that perhaps Vail Associates could place it on their private land or somewhere on the mountain. Randy asked Jim Hoy to let the Board know about progress on the Frazier Sculpture Park. The Board thanked Jim Hoy for his proposal and professional presentation. Jim Hoy thanked the Board for their time and effort in reviewing his proposal. Item No. 3 Mary Zimmerman presented a letter to the Board concerning a sculpture by Lee Stark. The project will be made locally at Battle Mountain Bronze in Minturn. Kristan asked Mary to schedule a review at an upcoming meeting. Item No. 4 The Parking Structure project. A motion was made by Jim Cotter and seconded by Fitzhugh Scott to appoint four people to work on possible artwork proposals for the new parking structure. The motion passed 9-0 Fitzhugh Scott, Randy Milhoan, Laura Nash, and Jamie McCluskie were appointed to serve on this committee. The first meeting with Michael Barber Architects is scheduled for noon on Monday, November 27th, in the small conference room. .. '' ~w Item No. 5 Follow up items. Kristan was asked to set up a meeting with the Post Office owner. Fitzhugh Scott, Roselyne Swig, and Tom Steinberg were asked to meet with the owner of the Post Office. Roselyne recommended that Kristan talk to the Washington State Program staff. She suggested that slides be obtained. She also directed Kristan to talk to the International Sculpture Committee for slides. Roselyne mentioned the idea of "artwork on the ground." Mosaics and pavings might be interesting art concepts to pursue for Vail. Randy Milhoan recommended that Cheryl from the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities be contacted concerning funding. Roselyn mentioned that she had some corrections on the Art in Public Places Guidelines. She agreed to write a letter summarizing her corrections and send them to Kristan. The Vail Valley Arts Council will present a conceptual proposal to the Arts Board at the next meeting on December 4th. Their project involves designing a mural for the office space located at the Lionshead Parking Structure. The meeting was adjourned. The next Art in Public Places Board meeting is scheduled for December 4, 1989 at 8:30 a.m. -~ o ~OWn 0 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)479-2138 (303)479-2139 November 22, 1989 office of community development Mr. Jim Hoy P.O. Box 398 Tabernash, Colorado 80478 Re: See or Ski Sculpture proposal for the Town of Vail Dear Jim, On behalf of the Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board, I would like to thank you for your efforts to present your Skier Sculpture proposal, See or Ski Colorado. Your presentation was extremely professional and very thorough. Even though the project was not approved, we appreciate your interest in our community. Thank you again for taking the time and effort to make a comprehensive presentation to the Board. If you have any additional questions about the review, please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ ~1~ - Kristan Pritz Senior Planner KP:lr cc: Art in Public Places Board down 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)479-2138 (303)479-2139 November 22, 1989 Mr. Kent Meyers Director of Marketing Vail Associates P.O. Box 7 Vail, Colorado 81658 Re: See or Ski Colorado Sculpture proposal Dear Kent, office of community developmen4 The Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board reviewed Mr. Jim Hoy's Skier Sculpture proposal on November 20, 1989. The Board voted to deny the request. The Board appreciated Mr. Hoy's very professional and thorough presentation. It was also evident that he has a very sincere interest in our community. Although the proposal was not approved, we appreciate you asking Mr. Hoy to work with the Town of Vail on this project. He was very cooperative and diplomatic throughout the review process. I also want to thank Betsy Farny on your staff who helped me a great deal by passing on information to Mr. Hoy. She was very patient with Mr. Hoy as well as with me in coordinating this project. If I can answer any specific questions for you about the review process, please give me a call at 479-2138. Once again, I appreciate your willingness to work with the Town of Vail. Sincerely, - j 11 ~1~~~~ • ~ Kristan Pritz Senior Planner KP:lr cc: Art in Public Places Board The Sail Trail -November 24, 1989 ~°~ ~~~d rejects one skier ~~~fl~~e9 v~.-.~._ s~~ anot~ier ~y s~~ >~>~~~AA>~ Vail's Art in Public Places Board on Monday rejected a sculpture proposed for north- west of the Covered Bridge, and then agreed to consider another piece. The sculpture of a skier was rejected with only Jamie McCluskey voting to accept the piece. Board members expressed a general dislike of the piece and of skier sculptures in general, and said the site in question is too prominent a location for anything less than the best. "I don't think a modern piece fits the alpine village," said Tom Steinberg. "This piece reminds me of going to a knickknack shop and looking at sculptures made from railroad spikes. Is that what we want in a prime spot?" Randy Milhoan said he had heard several negative reac- tions to the piece based on a photo in The Vail Trail. "I don't like the piece;' he said. "I'm not enamored of skiers," he said. "I don't know that we have to illustrate with skiers that we are a ski resort. I don't think we need a lot of figura tive or sentimental art. It's not beneficial to the community; it's not something to be proud of." Jim Cotter agreed, and said Vail does not need statues. Sally Sheridan also agreed, and said the skier sculpture. would restrict the site. "A skier is too limiting for that area," she said. , There was also discussion to the effect that Vail has a limited number of prime sites and ought to commission specific pieces to fit the sites rather than taking existing pieces and trying to make them fit. Rosalyn Swig especially -y. .~ '~ i ~`l ~k t t. ~ V~S '. ,x4' ~~'- t t, x. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~rr. .; ~: ~ ...: '~~ * ~ . z { ` ~~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ '~ . ~~ y r ~ ~~~~ ~ .~ "~ t. ,;~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,; • -yba~ i~... A 7 _ } t~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~.. ~ r \ ~. ~ ~: ' N 4 - ~ ' ~ } ~ ..f ~ Y ~. T ,,. ~ ;~? -°Liberation° by Lee Stark has been offered to the Town of Vail and will be considered by Art Board. Photo by Tara Flanagan. questioned the idea of considering existing pieces. She said Vail only has a few sites for public art but that they are "very wonderful sites. "We are a. world-class com- munity and we can think in world-class terms," she said. Swig said Vail should decide which sculptors it would like to work with and then try to get them. "Would a Calder be appro- priate? Would it bespeak Vail? If you had the chance to get an See next page y .. The Vail Trail -November 24, 1989 +~"~ ` ~ • From previous page r%litenburg, well, we had the chance, would that bespeak Vail? If•we had our choice, who •,wuld we like to attract to Vail?" she asked. Milhoan said the process of choosing art is complicated by the fact that the art board has not yet inventoried the appro- priate sites for public art i n Vail. Conducting such an in- ~: antory is one of the board's :coals for the next year. Seeming to object somewhat to the criterion of choosing only a known artist, sculptor J.M. Hoy said, "I firmly believe you will soon begin hearing the name Hoy. I'm before my time in coming before you as an established artist." In voting to accept Hoy's piece, McCluskey said h e thought the art board could help the piece to fit on the site. "I think it could work there;' he said. Hoy's piece "See or Ski Colorado" was considered by the art board after Hoy ap- proached Vail Associates with the idea of placing the sculp- ture in Vail. His idea was that a corporate sponsor would do- nate the sculpture and use it as part of its advertising and pub- lic relations. VA referred him and his sculpture to the town for consideration. Now, Milhoan said, VA is still free to make a deal with Hoy and place the sculpture on its own land if it wants to. Hoy also said he m a y approach Avon with a similar offer to the one he made Vail. After rejecting the Hoy sculpture, the town was promptly offered another piece for consideration. Lee Stark, apart-time Vail resident, has offered the town an eight-foot bronze of his sculpture "Liberation" at no cost to the town if a n "agreeable location" can be found. Stark would prefer the sculpture be placed on one of the lower rocks in the fountain north of the Covered Bridge. Casting of the sculpture is being done at Battle Mountain Bronze in Minturn. Stark, like Hoy, would like to find a ,sponsor, but would donate the piece to the town whether a sponsor is found or not. His sculpture is also of a skier. . Stark was not at the Monday meeting, but was represented by Mary Zimmerman of Battle Mountain •Bronze. She said "Liberation" is not aone-of-a- kind piece, but that three of them are being cast as well as a number of smaller copies of the work. Consideration of this piece will be scheduled for a future meeting of the art board, but no date has yet been set for that. The board meets on the first and third Mondays of each month. Another current project of the art board is to work with the town and the architects to see if public art can be included in the upcoming addition to the Vail Village parking structure. It was suggested that public art in the structure could include such things as murals, trash cans, fountains, stair- ways, and stairway rails. The board also agreed to try and meet with the contractors of the new Vail post office to see if some public art can be included there. The desire to see public art placed as part of large new developments led to a discus- sion of trying to convince the town to enact an ordinance requiring public art as part of some new developments. ~~ The Town of Vail goes to Mexico for Christmas! F 4 J l One very special aspect of the Town of Vail is the many countries and cultures which are represented by employees and citizens. Individuals from around the globe come together to make us Number One! In recognition of our eclectic population, we would like to pay tribute to the traditions of these nationalities beginning with our neighboring country of Mexico. __ Come Join Us for TOV's FELIZ NAVIDAD CELEBRATION! Place: The Westin Hotel - Cascade Ballroom Date: Friday - December 15, 1989 Time: Cocktails - 6:30 to 7:00 PM Dinner - 7:00 PM Entertainment: Presentation of TOV Employee of the Year Award Dancing to the rhythms of Anything Goes! Door prizes and gifts ~. me join us for a Christmas party in the Mexican tradition: Mexican buffet, a Mexican serenade, pinatas and more! ~, >~'«~ (Two drink coupons will bo provided per person. Each person will be responsible for purchaso of additional beverages.) Na~~ of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2105 office o4 touvn manager December 5, 1989 Mr. Ed Grange General Manager Holy Cross Electric Association P. 0. Box 250 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Dear Ed: Dave Sage has talked with John Slevin and gave him your Board's counter proposal for selling the Noly Cross parcel in Vail to the Town of Vail. It is my understanding that the counter offer includes a proposed sales price of $595,000, and terms of ten percent down payment with fourteen years to pay the balance at nine percent interest. If this information is in any way different from ,your understanding of the counter proposal, please let me know as soon as possible. The Town Council election produced four new Councilmembers out of the seven total. The Council is in the process over the next few weeks of examining its priorities and getting up to speed. I would guess the Council will be able to address your counter proposal and give a formal response by sometime in January. Thank you for your Board's consideration of our offer and for presenting this counter proposal. Sinc e , Rondall U. Phillips Town Manager RVP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council David Sage • ,, ~o~o of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2105 office of 4ov~rn manager December 5, 1989 The Honorable Walter Fox Mayor P. 0. gox 109 Red Cliff, Colorado 81649 Dear Walter: Thank you for your letter of December 4 concerning what the Town of Red Cliff has done in seeking planning assistance from the Northwest Colorado COG and others. I suggest that your staff representative, or Council representative, sit down with someone from the Vail Community Development Department and staff members from other entities from whom you have requested funds in a joint meeting to discuss the scope of work you are looking at, and how that best might be achieved. I feel it is important that some staff review of this proposal occur before taking the funding request to any of the governing bodies. A member of our Community Development Department will be happy to meet with the group at a mutually acceptable time and place. Cal Thomas or Jim Lamont may feel free to contact Peter Patten directly to arrange a meeting. Sincer , Rondall U. Phillips Town Manager RUP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council Peter Patten Charles Wick ~~ ®~ E ~~~~~ REC'DOEC -51989 RIe® CLIFF, ~®L®RA®® ~~649 Town Council Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, ColoraGO 81657 December 4, 1989 Dear Mayor and Members of the Town Council: We wish to bring to your attention, additional information with regards to our budgetary request for joint planning funds. T_n o~~r October 9, 1989 letter we requested budgetary. consideration, by the Vail Town Council, concerning the need to mutually finance planning studies in the territory between our two communities. We pointed out that Colorado State Statues now permits communities to join in inter-governmental agreements for the purpose of master planning territory of ' common concern. A new state law past in the 1989 session of the state legislature provides for intergovernmental agreements which permits local governments to provide for mutually enforceable comprehensive development plans. The law, House Bill 1342, allows local governments pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement, to provide for revenue-sharing as a means to provide funding for jointly prepared comprehensive development plans. An intergovernmental agreement can contain a provision that a comprehensive development plan shall continue to control a particular land area even though the land area is annexed or jurisdiction transferred to another local government. We received a response from your Town Manager on October 26, 1989 suggesting that we seek financial assistance from the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments. On November 15, 1989 we submitted to the NWCCOG, in respect to your Town Manager's suggestion, an impact assistance application for a grant to allow us to conduct within the Town of Red Cliff master planning studies and prepare land use regulations. The planning project will focus on the following areas, which have been identified by the Town Council as needing immediate attention. The preparation of Land Use Regulations which incorporate development restriction in areas of known flood plain and geologic hazards, establishes land use and development standards, provide for the protection and -- preservation of historic site and structure „ and identify Town of Vail Joint Planning: Funding Proposal December 4, 1989 Page 2 areas for annexation and new development. Secondly, to take into consideration the affects of the needs and plans of surrounding governmental jurisdictions. The Town Council has budgeted $5000 for the purpose of funding its 1989 planning program. In addition, to conducting our own planning effort, we wish our representatives to participate, with other local agencies and governments, concerning issues which will affect the future of our community. We are requesting funds which will be used for the purpose of providing our own professional representation during the conduct of applicable planning studies and discussions. We wish to consult with the Town of Vail municipal government as to how the Town of Red Cliff can contribute to the solution of mutual problems such as residential housing, transportation, and recreation. The Town of Red Cliff shares many of the same planning concerns with the` Town of Vail, particularly as it relates to the future development of Vail Mountain and the availability of a labor force for local businesses. Once our water and sanitation problems are corrected, the community may be able'to provide additional capacity for residential housing units which can be used to provide housing for the local population. ..However, without prior planning we cannot adequately determine the quantity of housing which we can provide. If funds are not available from. other local or State of Colorado sources, the Town of Red Cliff municipal government will be placed in the position of imposing a building moratorium. The moratorium will be required until the municipal government can set aside sufficient funds to prepare and adopt the planning and land use regulations required by .State of Colorado statutes. Representatives of the USFS have agreed to participate in a mutual planning effort. Issues of mutual concerns include Eagle County Land Use Plan, Vail Mountain Development, Shrine Pass Development, Eagle Mine and Battle Mountain Land Use Development, Holy Cross Wilderness, Camp Hale Development Area, Climax Mine Restoration Area, and the multiple-use development areas of the USFS. Town of Vail Joint Planning: Funding Proposal December 4,.1989 Page 3 We would appreciate your consideration of our request for $5000 for the Town of Red Cliff, to jointly fund planning protect concerning residential housing, transportation, recreation facilities and other pertinent subjects. Prior to your making a final determination on this proposal, I would like to request the opportunity to address the Vail To:ti°:~ Council with regards to this matter. We have or will make similar requests of other local governments and private entities. Sincerely, ~ ~~/ Mayor Walter Fox RECD DEC - 5 1989 December 5, 1989 Mr. Peter Patten Director of Community Development Town of Vail Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mr. Patten: SUBJECTo PLANNING COMMISSION Please accept this letter as my request to serve on the Planning Commission for the Town of Vail. The following will illustrate my interest in community development and my qualifications for this position. EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONe I have been involved in development and construction of resort communities for over 30 years, including Perisher Valley, Australia; Telluride, Aspen and Vail, Colorado. I can read and understand plans and development concepts readily. CONCERN FOR QUALITY GROWTHo As a full time resident in Vail since 1966, I have developed sensitivity to the needs and desires of the local constituency as well as the reality of growth within our community. BROAD BUSINESS PERSPECT%~lEo As former Director of the largest department at Vail Associates (Ski School), as well as through other business endeavors, I have developed in-depth knowledge that includes aspects of finance, administration and personnel. HIGH ENERGY AND CREDIBIL%TYo Due to objectivity and professionalism, I have become repected as a loyal and caring member of our community. I have developed sound work and business habits and have the energy to contribute to a number of tasks. I have a strong personal desire to make a positive difference within our community. Due to my background, I believe that my energies and interest would allow me to make a valuable contribution if I were a member of the planning commission. If appointed, I would endeavor to be a diligent and hardworking member in helping to shape Vail's future. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ludwig Kurz 2725 Bald Mountain Rd. Vail, CO 81657 Updated: 12/04/89 TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS Name Mailing Address Kent R. Rose, Mayor P. 0. Box 2101 Vail, CO 81658 Thomas I. Steinberg, Mayor Pro Tem P. 0. Box 13 Vail, CO 81658 Lynn A. Fritzlen P. 0. Box 57 Vail, CO 81658 Jim J. Gibson 5137 North Main Gore Drive Vail, CO 81657 Merv Lapin 232 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Robert M. Levine 680 West Lionshead Place Vail, CO 81657 Spouse/Bus/Res Term Term Home Address Begin Ex ire Rayma/476-6340/3375 11/83 11/91 1881 Lionsridge Loop #3 Florence/476-5695/5427 11/87 11/91 1022 Eagles Nest Circle William Pierce/476-6342/7060 11/89 11/91 2998 South Frontage Road West Nancy/476-0742/0742 Same 476-5483/5483 Same Sandrine/476-2471/2471 Same Margaret (Peggy) A. Osterfoss c/o Columbine Creations 143 East Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Rondall V. Phillips, Town Manager P. 0. Box 1322 Vail, CO 81658 DEPARTMENT HEADS 11/89 11/93 11/87 11/91 ;11/89 11/93 476-1730/0503 11/89 11/93 4010 North Frontage Road East Karen/479-2100/6656 2507 Arosa Drive Stan Berryman, Public Works/Transportation Director Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Dick Duran, Fire Chief Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Annie Fox, Library Director Ken Hughey, Chief of Police Peter Patten, Community Development Director Charlie Wick, Assistant Town Manager/Administrative Services Director - (H) 949-1318, (W) 479-2113 R" _- ~o. P ~ DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON STEVE WARWICK PETE BURNETT DICK DURAN CAROLINE FISHER ANNIE FOX JOHN GALLEGOS PETER PATTEN FILE ERNST GLATZLE SKIP GORDON GREG HALL SUSIE HERVERT JIM HOZA KEN HUGHEY JOE KOCHERA HANK LOVATO CINDY VAN HOOSE- SORENSEN TOWN COUNCIL GARY MURRAIN JOE NORRIS MIKE ROSE TODD SCHOLL LEO VASQUEZ CHARLIE WICK PAT DODSON PATTY BIERLE MEMORANDUM TOo RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER FROMe STAN BERRYMAN, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATEo NOVEMBER 29 , 1989 REo PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 27 - DECEMBER 1, 1989 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Continue installation of X-Mas lights, garland and wreaths. 2. Replace totem pole at Ice Arena. 3. Deliver Christmas trees. 4. Chisel concrete at steps of Vail 21 Building so the will match. 5. Relocate parking info sign near EV exit. 6. Continue winter operations, weather permitting. 7. Correct and install additional pedestrian signs in Village and Lionshead. 8. Move jersey barriers to loading area at VTRC. 9. Install caution signs on Golf Course curve. B. 1. Install grease reel at PW Bay. PARKING STRUCTURE A. 1. Replace door at Main Vail Fire Station. 2. Install vestibule at LTRC Auxiliary Building 3. Install loading zone area - lst floor - W. end - LHTRC. 4. Install ski racks at LH Auxiliary Building. 5. Order & install sign at Library - "Please Stay Off Roof'° . 6. Keep record of cars at Ford Park. B. 1. Beginning 12/10, the LHTRC will be open 24 hours. 2. Fix water fountain in Library atrium. PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST PAGE 2 CARPENTERS A. B. 1. Replace various railings at LHTRC. 2. Construct and install bus stop posts. 3. Build directory signage covers for VTRC. 4. Replace totem pole at Concert Hall Plaza. 5. Construct WV bus shelter. 6. Building tree stands for X-mas. 7. Construct various wood street signs. 1. Install partitions at PD Detective area. 2. Repair signs (4-way stop, Lionshead). 3. Investigate kitchen appliance remodel at Library. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Begin installation of power for X-mas lights. 2. Adjust clocktower. 3. Hook up new hotsy in bus wash. 4. Replace baseboard heaters in LH & Village Booths. 5. Change out directional light at Main Vail ticket booths. 6. Repair outages as per inventoryo a. Concert Hall Plaza b. Manor Vail co Behind Ice Arena d. Tunnel Light B. 1. Install light in coatroom in PW Admin. Bldg. 2. Perform various electrical work at Ice Arenao a .Install new wire moulding and switch in managers office. b. Move low voltage light switches from office to zamboni room. c. Move welding plug to new location and add plug-in strip. d. Research information on plug-in strip (sockets) for special event powere e. Add fluorescent light fixture in boiler area. f. Replace 2 ballasts in locker rooms. g. Change EM light ballasts. h. Add outlets in Dennis°s new office. 3. Repair outlet near little copier at Municipal Building - see Tracy. 4. Install electrical outlet for printer at Rec Department. 5. Perform maintenance jobs at Librarye a. Unhook stove in Community Room b. Change several ballasts 6. Electrical parts ordered for TRC bathrooms. 7. Fix fan in Library staff restroom. SB/slh