HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-05 Support Documentation Town Council Regular SessionVAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1989
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Charles Davis
2. Approval of Minutes of the November 7 and 21, 1989 Meetings
3. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, an ordinance amending
certain sections of Chapter 16.22 so that Chapter 16.22 regulates signs in
the Arterial Business District Zone District of the Town of Vail (ABD) as
well as the Commercial Core III Zone District (CC3).
4. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance amending
sections of Chapter 18 of the Vail Municipal Code and repealing and
re-enacting Section 18.58.310, Short Term Rental Accommodation Unit of the
Municipal Code to provide for bed and breakfast operations under certain
provisions and circumstances and to define bed and breakfast and setting
forth details in regard thereto.
5. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, first reading, an ordinance making
supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, Booth Creek
local improvement district fund, Communities for Drug-Free Eagle Valley
fund, special parking assessment fund, Vail marketing fund, Lionshead Mall
assessment district fund, and the real estate transfer tax fund, of the
1989 budget and the financial plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and
authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein.
6. Appoint Members to the Planning and Environmental Commission
7. Action on Vail Metropolitan Recreation District Tennis Court Ground Lease
8. Sign Variance Request and an Appeal of a Design Review Board Decision, for
the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom located at the Inn at Vail, 2211
North Frontage Road (Applicant: Jim Wilson)
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
9. Adjournment
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1989
7:30 p.m.
~.
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30
7:35
7:40
Mike Mollica
1. Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Charles Davis
2. Approval of Minutes of the November 7 and 21, 1989 Meetings
3. Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, amending
Chapter 16.22 regulating signs in the ABD and CC3 zone
district
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 28, Series of 1989, on second reading.
Background Rationale: The PEC, at their September 26, 1989
public hearing, unanimously recommended approval of the
proposed amendment to the zoning code. Section 4 of the
ordinance reflects the wording changes the Council requested
at the previous hearing.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 28, Series of
1989, on second reading.
7:55
Peter Patten
4. Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989, first reading, creating
regulations for bed and breakfasts in the Town of Vail
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 31, Series of 1989, on first reading.
Background Rationale: The staff, PEC, and Council have been
working on bed and breakfast regulations since February
1988. In March of 1989, Council remanded Ordinance No. 2,
Series of 1989, back to the PEC upon second reading. We
held a PEC/Council joint work session in September 1989 in
which the issues were agreed upon. PEC has recommended
unanimously to Council that the revised ordinance (No. 31)
be adopted.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 31, Series of
1989, on first reading.
8:20
Steve Barwick
5. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1989, first reading, regarding
a supplemental appropriation to the Town budget
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance
No. 32, Series of 1989, on first reading.
Background Rationale: This is an ordinance making
supplemental appropriations from the 1989 Town of Vail
general fund, real estate transfer tax fund, Booth Creek
local improvement district, Communities for a Drug-Free
Eagle Valley fund, special parking assessment fund, Vail
marketing fund, and the Lionshead Mall assessment district
fund. The majority of the dollar amount of this
supplemental appropriation is related to the financing of
the Village parking structure addition.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 32, Series of
1989, on first reading.
8:40 6. Appoint Members to the Planning and Environmental Commission '_
Peter Patten
Action Requested of Council: Appoint three new PEC members
to fill Pam Hopkins', Peggy Osterfoss's, and Sid Schultz's
positions.
Background Rationale: Pam Hopkins resigned from PEC in
October 1989. Peggy Osterfoss was elected to Council.
Advertising and publiei•zi_.ng for new Commissioners has
occurred throughout. the last 2 months. We have 3 applicants
to date. Also, Sid Schultz has resigned effective January
1, 1990. Pam and Peggy's terms were to expire in February
1990. Sid's term continues until February 1991.
Staff Recommendation: Appoint 3 new PEC members now. Two
will take effect immediately, and a third, Sid Schultz's
term, will take effect January 1.
8:50 7. Action on VMRD Tennis Court Ground Lease
Larry Eskwith
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny the lease
agreement.
Background Rationale: The VMRD wishes to build a tennis
complex on TOV property. They wish to use a lease purchase
agreement to finance the project. The lender (lessor) is
requiring a ground lease from the Town as security in the
event VMRD defaults on their lease payments.
Staff Recommendation: There will be a memo for Council. If
it is not completed in time to be included in your packets,
it will be mailed (or delivered) so you receive it on
Monday.
9:05 8. Sign Variance Request and an Appeal of a DRB Decision, for
Mike Mollica the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom located at the Inn at
Vail, 2211 North Frontage Road (Applicant: Jim Wilson)
Action Requested of Council: 1) Approve/deny the requested
sign variance. 2) Uphold/overturn the action of the DRB
regarding the design of the awning and associated signage.
Background Rationale: On October 18, 1989, the Design
Review Board, by a vote of 4-1, recommended denial of the
sign variance. On November 29, 1989, the DRB, by a vote of
4-0, denied the design of the awning and associated
signage. The applicant has appealed this decision.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Staff recommends denial of the
variance request. 2) Staff does not ordinarily make
recommendations regarding compliance with the design
guidelines.
9:35 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
9:50 9. Adjournment
-2-
-MINUTES - - -
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 7, 1989
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, November 7, 1989, at
7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Kent Rose, Mayor
John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem
Eric Affeldt
Michael Cacioppo
Merv Lapin
Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal
Tom Steinberg
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT:
None
Ron Phillips, Town Manager
Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
The first order of business was a Ten Year Employment Anniversary Award to Mike
Rose. Ron Phillips gave background information on Mike, the Superintendent of
Parking with the Town of Vail, and this was followed by comments from Stan
Berryman. Mike thanked everyone, and Kent Rose stated the Council appreciated
Mike's hard work over the years.
The second item of business on the agenda was a consent agenda of the following
items:
A. Approval of the October 3 and 17, 1989 Meeting Minutes
B. Appointment of Steve Simonett as a Local Licensing Authority Board Member
After a brief discussion regarding the minutes, Merv Lapin made a motion to approve
the consent agenda, which John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously 7-0.
The next item was Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1989, second reading, adopting a 1990
budget and financial plan. Mayor Rose read the full title. Steve Barwick noted the
changes made for second reading. Tom Steinberg questioned the surveyor position and
the possibility of a better way to handle it; Mayor Rose agreed he also had
questions regarding that and felt it should be put on a future Work Session agenda
for discussion. Eric Affeldt commended staff on their reporting and information
gathering for Council. He felt the Town was in the best financial position ever,
but was disappointed the public was not that interested. He noted he was not in
favor of as large an increase in the marketing budget as what was approved at first
reading. Mike Cacioppo agreed with Eric regarding the marketing budget, and that
was one reason why he voted against the ordinance at first reading. John Slevin
briefly explained why he thought it was increased to the final amount. After some
discussion, Mayor Rose stated the amount should be left as it was at this point, to
be determined later, depending on Town of Avon, Eagle County, and Vail Associates'
contributions. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance on second reading
with a reduction in the marketing fund to $117,000 instead of the $163,000, and Eric
Affeldt seconded. Rob Levine commented why he felt the $163,000 should be left in.
A vote was taken and the motion failed 3-4, with Tom Steinberg, Kent Rose, John
Slevin, and Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal opposing. Eric Affeldt then made a motion to
approve the ordinance on second reading with the marketing fund amount of $163,000.
Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. Mike Cacioppo remarked he would vote against the
ordinance because he did not believe the Community Development Department needed an
increase in staff (it should be getting smaller, not larger), he was disappointed
there was no West Vail fire station included in the budget, did not agree with a
five percent increase for the Town Manager's position, did not agree with the large
increase for the Marketing Board budget, or the $35,000 funding to Bravo! Colorado.
Mayor Rose remarked there was a five percent increase in the budget, but no actual
increase had been approved yet, so the money was not guaranteed to be spent. A vote
was taken and the motion passed 6-1, with Mike Cacioppo opposing.
"-. ~ `,- {
--- -The foarth--order of business was Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1989, first reading, "-_
regarding sales tax revenue bonds for the parking structure expansion and
renovation. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Charlie Wick introduced Steve
Jeffers, of Kirchner Moore, and Dee Wisor, of Sherman & Howard. Steve distributed
revised copies of the ordinance with changes made earlier today. He reviewed the
changes and explained the reasoning for them. Steve then answered questions of
Council. Merv Lapin made a motion to approve the ordinance, and Tom Steinberg
seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The next issue was Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1989, first reading, establishing a
program of investments to provide for the payment of the Town's outstanding bonds.
Mayor Rose read the full title. Steve Jeffers noted two minor changes in the
ordinance, and explained what the ordinance would do. He and Dee Wisor then
answered questions of Council. After some discussion by Council, Merv Lapin made a
motion to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Mike Cacioppo. A vote
was then taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
Next was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Special
Development District No. 6 converting condominium unit no. 30 from commercial to
residential. The full title of the ordinance was read by Mayor Rose. Peter Patten
commented this item had been tabled at the last Evening Meeting, and the request was
to convert the Goods retail condominium unit in the Vail Village Inn into
residential space. He noted there had been some revisions to the proposal since the
last meeting; he explained what the changes were. Peter then gave background
information regarding Phases I and II of the condominiums in the Vail Village Inn,
and added staff continued their recommendation for approval of the conversion.
There was then some discussion between Council, Peter Jamar, and Peggy Osterfoss
regarding the Planning and Environmental Commission's decision and reasoning for
denying the request by a vote of 4-3. A motion to approve the ordinance was then
made by Merv Lapin and seconded by Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal. After more discussion
between Council and Peter Jamar, a vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously
7-0.
Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Title 17 to provide a
definition for single family subdivisions was next on the agenda. Mayor Rose read
the full title. Mike Mollica briefly explained the ordinance, and then answered
questions of Council. After a short discussion, Eric Affeldt made a motion to
approve the ordinance, which Mike Cacioppo seconded. A vote was taken and the
motion passed 6-1, with Merv Lapin opposing.
The eighth order of business was Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1989, first reading,
amending Section 18.24.020 by adding "Commercial Ski Storage." The full title was
read by Mayor Rose. There was no discussion by Council or the public. Merv Lapin
made a motion to approve the ordinance, and John Slevin seconded. A vote was taken
and the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The next item was Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1989, first reading, amending Chapter
2.20 by adding an application fee for temporary liquor licenses. Mayor Rose read
the complete title. Pam Brandmeyer explained the reasoning for the ordinance, and
answered questions of Council. A motion to approve the ordinance on first reading
was made by Merv Lapin and seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously 7-0.
The tenth item on the agenda was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, first reading,
amending Chapter 16.22 regulating signs in the Arterial Business District and
Commercial Core III zone district. Mayor Rose read the title. Mike Mollica gave
background information on the ordinance, and commented the Planning and
Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval. Merv Lapin made a motion
to approve, with John Slevin seconding. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously 7-0.
The last item on the agenda was a Gart Brothers sign variance request. Kristan
Pritz reviewed the requests for variances of size, height, and number of signs, and
reviewed criteria used for the requests. She then explained why staff recommended
approval. Kristan commented the Design Review Board had approved the requests by a
5-0 vote for the variance, and a 4-1 vote for the design; one did not like the black
and white striped barber pole. After some discussion by Council, Gail
Wahrlich-Lowenthal made a motion to approve the three variance requests in
accordance with the findings in the staff memorandum dated October 18, 1989. John
Slevin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-3, with Tom
Steinberg, Eric Affeldt, and Merv Lapin opposing. Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal and John
Slevin explained to staff that Council should be informed of something like this
-2-
~:
design affecting a large area. Something like the flags, pole, and scale of the '_
sign should be emphasized to Council in the Design Review Board report. Peter
Patten and Kristan emphasized that the pole and flags had been previously approved
by the DRB before the sign variance was considered. They also stated it would be
inappropriate for the staff to decide which proposals have negative impacts and
which proposals do not. It was also pointed out that three planners handle DRB
requests. It is impossible for the planner who makes the DRB report to know about
all the details of each proposal, particularly when a project is approved
unanimously by the DRB. After some discussion, Kristan stated staff would try to be
more sensitive to issues like this. Mike Cacioppo then asked for a reconsideration
vote. Ron Phillips looked up the correct procedure in Roberts' Rules of Order, and
to have the vote reconsidered would take a two-thirds vote. Mike Cacioppo then made
a motion that the previous question be reconsidered, which Merv Lapin seconded. A
vote was taken and the motion failed 4-3, with John Slevin, Kent Rose, and Gail
Wahrlich-Lowenthal opposing. The motion failed due to lack of a two-thirds vote for
reconsideration.
Under Citizen Participation, Ken Wilson thanked the Council, Ron Phillips, and the
Town staff for the construction of the road by his house. He felt the Town did a
great job, and the road was much better now.
James Johnson requested that Evening Meeting minutes, transcripts, or tapes be
available at the Public Library for review. Mayor Rose replied that copies of the
minutes would be made available at the Library.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman
-3-
P~ _w
-- -MINUTES -- -
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 1989
7:30 P.M.
A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, November 21, 1989,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Kent Rose, Mayor
John Slevin, Mayor Pro Tem
Eric Affeldt
Michael Cacioppo
Merv Lapin
Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal
Tom Steinberg
MEMBERS ABSENT:
TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT:
None
Ron Phillips, Town Manager
Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney
Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Mike Cacioppo was not present at the time the meeting began.
The first order of business was Resolution No. 62, Series of 1989, recognizing and
congratulating Red Sandstone Elementary School for winning the 1989 State Champion
physical fitness award. Ann Sanders and Firooz Zadeh accepted the resolution on
behalf of the children, and thanked the Council for recognizing the students.
Mike Cacioppo arrived.
A motion was made by Gail Wahrlich-Lowenthal to approve the resolution. The motion
was seconded by Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously
7-0.
The next item was Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1989, second reading, regarding sales
tax revenue bonds for the parking structure expansion and renovation. The full
title was read by Mayor Rose. Joe Barrows (representing Steve Jeffers), of Kirchner
Moore, and Dee Wisor, of Sherman & Howard, remarked on a few changes made in the
ordinance since first reading, and why. They distributed revised copies of the
ordinance with the noted changes. They also commented on the bond ratings and a
.rate change, and then answered questions of Council. Eric Affeldt made a motion to
approve the ordinance with the changes presented by Dee Wisor. John Slevin
seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
Item three was Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1989, second reading, establishing a
program of investments to provide for the payment of the Town's outstanding bonds.
Mayor Rose read the full title. Dee Wisor distributed updated copies of the
ordinance with the exact amounts filled in. Joe Barrows and Dee then answered
questions of Council. After some discussion, Eric Affeldt made a motion to approve
the ordinance with the changes as presented by Dee Wisor. The motion was seconded
by Merv Lapin. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The next order of business was a Consent Agenda of the following items:
A. Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Special
Development District No. 6 converting condominium unit no. 30 from commercial to
residential.
B. Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Title 17 to
provide a definition for single family subdivisions.
C. Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Section
18.24.020 by adding "Commercial Ski Storage."
D. Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1989, second reading, amending Chapter 2.20 by
adding an application fee for temporary liquor licenses.
-- - E. -Ordinance No. 28, Series of-1989;- second reading, amending Chapter 16.22
regulating signs in the Arterial Business District and Commercial Core III zone
district.
Mayor Rose read the full title of each. Joe Macy, of Vail Associates, Inc., stated
he had a problem with Ordinance No. 28, and asked Council to have this item
withdrawn from the Consent Agenda and tabled to a later date. Merv Lapin had a
question regarding Ordinance No. 25, and asked to have it withdrawn from the Consent
Agenda, also. Merv Lapin then made a motion to approve Ordinances 24, 26, and 27 on
the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by John Slevin. A vote was taken and
the motion passed unanimously 7-0.
Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1989, second reading, was then discussed. Merv Lapin
asked to have the ordinance clarif ied. Peter Patten tried to clarify the
subdivision issue and explained just what the ordinance would do.
Mayor Rose interrupted the meeting at this point to announce the outcome of the
municipal election. He stated that Peggy Osterfoss, Rob Levine, and Jim Gibson were
elected for four year terms, and Lynn Fritzlen was elected for a two year term. A
ten minute break followed.
Discussion regarding Ordinance No. 25 continued. Larry Eskwith gave further
clarification. Merv Lapin then made a motion to approve the ordinance on second
reading, and Tom Steinberg seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed
unanimously 7-0.
Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1989, second reading, was next. Joe Macy read the
paragraph he objected to - page 3, Section 4. He gave a hypothetical case of a
potential problem as he saw it. He felt it was unfair that a new business
technically would not be allowed a sign if the building did not have an approved
sign program. Larry Eskwith explained the sarne language was used as was used for
signage in the Commercial Core III sign code. Bruce Allen remarked the problem Joe
was talking about was not hypothetical, but a real problem which existed currently.
Kristan Pritz explained the reasoning for the paragraph's inclusion in the
ordinance. She stated that sign programs were required in CC3 to try and develop a
comprehensive approach to signage for the large "shopping mall" type buildings in
West Vail. Merv Lapin discussed tabling the ordinance for two weeks so the staff
could work on rewording. There was some discussion regarding the problems. Eric
Affeldt made a motion to table the ordinance until the next Evening Meeting December
5, which Mike Cacioppo seconded. Eric commented he agreed with Merv, that if
something was in the Code we did not enforce, either enforce it or get rid of it;
there was no reason to leave something on the books if we were not going to enforce
it. Bruce was told to contact Kristan with his concerns. A vote was taken and the
motion passed unanimously 7-0.
The fourth item on the agenda was the sign variance request for the Finishing Touch
Furniture Showroom located in the Inn at Vail (Applicant: Jim Wilson). Larry
Eskwith gave chronological background information up to the current date. He stated
that the applicant had never appealed the Design Review Board decision on the design
of the awning, so there was no basis for the applicant to be before the Council
tonight. Mayor Rose asked how things got to this point, to which Larry replied he
had just looked at the staff memorandum for the first time today. Peter Patten
added that they had found the error today at 5:00 p.m. Peter then reviewed the
Design Review Board's actions up to this point. After some discussion regarding
problems and options, Tom Steinberg made a motion to table the item until the
project was reviewed by the DRB and the applicant appeals the DRB decision on the
design of the signage. Eric Affeldt seconded. A vote was taken and the motion
passed unanimously 7-0.
Under Citizen Participation, Mike Cacioppo requested to continue receiving check
registers. He stated he would pay for the copies, and submit a check on a monthly
basis.
Tom Steinberg asked if the problem regarding the Villa Cortina was being addressed.
Ron Phillips stated it would be. Peter Patten remarked it was an old problem.
Mayor Rose asked that if all business was concluded, he would like the Council to
move into an Executive Session at this time to discuss a continuing land
negotiation.
-2-
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. ~-
Respectfully submitted,
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Minutes taken by Brenda Chesman
-3-
A ..f -~
- - -ORDINANCE N0. 28- -- - - "-_
Series of 1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16.22 SO
THAT CHAPTER 16.22 REGULATES SIGNS IN THE ARTERIAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT ZONE DISTRICT OF THE TOWN OF VAIL (ABD) AS WELL AS
THE COMMERCIAL CORE III ZONE DISTRICT (CC3).
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail wishes to provide sign categories
for the Arterial Business Zone District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO:
Section 1.
The title of Chapter 16.22 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby
amended to read Sign Categories for CC3 Zone District and ABD Zone Districts.
Section 2.
Section 16.22.010 designated is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.010
A. This chapter concerns those types of permanent and temporary signs
requiring a sign application permit under the provisions o~f this title for property
within the CC3 and ABD zone districts. This chapter further includes the purpose of
each sign type, size, height, number, location, design, and landscaping
requirements, and special provisions for each type of sign.
B. The following is a listing of sign categories permitted in the CC3 and ABD
under the provisions of this title:
1. Building identification signs;
2. Display boxes;
3. Flags, pennants, banners, and bunting;
4. Murals and supergraphics;
5. Political signs;
6. Projecting and hanging signs, arcades;
7. Projecting and hanging signs, individual businesses within a
multi-tenant building;
8. Projecting and hanging signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant
building;
9. Sign programs;
10. Public information signs;
11. Temporary site development signs;
..
12-~-Traffic control signs-for private property; -- - ~-
13. Wall signs, arcade;
14. Wall signs, individual businesses within a multi-tenant building;
15. Wall signs, joint directory signs for a multi-tenant building;
16. Wall signs, single business use;
17. Window signs.
C. A business or organization within CC3 and/or ABD is permitted the following
number of signs provided the provisions of each category are met:
1. An individual business with a multi-tenant building may have the
following signs:
a. A display box;
b. A projecting and hanging sign or a wall-mounted sign;
c. Traffic control signs;
d. Window signs;
e. Other temporary signs as permitted in the provisions of this
Code;
f. Space within a joint directory .sign for the building.
2. An individual business which is the sole occupant within a building
may have the following signs:
a. A display box;
b. A wall sign or a free standing sign;
c. Traffic control signs;
d. Window signs;
e. Other temporary signs as permitted in the provisions of this
Code;
D. Following in Section 16.22.020 through 16.22.160 is a listing by sign types
of the requirements under this Section.
Section 3.
Section 16.22.015 Building Identification Signs, paragraph C, is hereby amended
to read as follows:
16.22.015 BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNS
C. Height; wall-mounted building identification signs:
No part of the sign shall extend above twenty-five (25) feet from
existing grade or the plate line of a building, whichever is less;
Free standing building identification signs:
-2-
No part of the sign shall extend above eight (8) feet from existing ~-
grade;
Section 4.
Section 16.22.100 Sign Program, paragraph I(1), is hereby amended to read as
follows:
16.22.100 SIGN PROGRAM
I. 1. At the time that any sign on a building located within Commercial Core
III or Arterial Business District is removed, changed, or altered in any way, a sign
program for that particular building is encouraged to be submitted to the Design
Review Board prior to the erection of any new sign on the building.
Section 5.
Section 16.22.100 I(4) is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.100
I. 4. In the case where a building located within CC3 or ABD has a business
frontage which is not adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads, but has
calculable frontage which is located along a pedestrian way at the end of a building
adjacent to the interior of CC3 or ABD and has direct access or display area along
that pedestrian way, the provisions applicable shall be the same as for a business
fronting on an arcade, subject to the approval of the Design Review Board.
Section 6.
Section 16.22.100 I(4)(b) is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.100
I. 4. b. This provision is not applicable to businesses with frontage
adjacent to exterior boundaries of CC3 or ABD other than the North and South
Frontage Roads.
Section 7.
Section 16.22.110, paragraph A, is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.110
A. Purpose, to indicate or identify a development of ,real property under
construction in CC3 or ABD.
Section 8.
Section 16.22.120 is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.120 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY
Traffic control signs for CC3 or ABD shall be regulated as follows:
A. Purpose, to relieve vehicular and pedestrian traffic congestion and promote
the safe and expedient flow and parking of traffic on private property;
-3-
-- - -B. -~Si-ze; al-1 vehicular traffic-control signs shall not exceed one square foot, -_
except multi-purpose signs, which shall not exceed four square feet. All pedestrian
traffic control signs shall not exceed one square foot, except multi-purpose signs,
which shall not exceed four square feet, subject to the approval of the design
review board;
C. Height, no part of the sign shall extend above six feet from existing
grade;
D. Number, subject to the approval of the design review board;
E. Location shall be determined by design review board, with a letter of
approval from the town engineer for any sign placed adjacent to a public street or
way;
F. Design, subject to the approval of the design review board;
G. Lighting, indirect, at the discretion of the design review board;
H. Landscaping at discretion of design review board;
I. Special provisions shall be as follows:
1. May be either free-standing or wall-mounted, with same size
requirements;
2. No individual sign will be approved unless it conforms to an overall
sign program for the entire building, submitted by the applicant;
3. No sign shall contain any advertising, but may identify the owner by
name;
4. If a "no parking" sign (as furnished by the town) is used, there may
be no other sign for the same purpose.
Section 9.
Section 16.22.140, paragraph E, shall be amended as follows:
16.22.140
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall of the individual business or
organization, adjacent to the North or South Frontage Roads, subject to the approval
of the Design Review Board; .
Section 10.
Section 16.22.140, paragraph H(3), is here amended to read as follows:
16.22.140
H. 3. An individual business with no calculable frontage along the North or
South Frontage Roads, or with a basement or second floor entrance, may have one (1)
sign with a maximum area of five (5) square feet in a location approved by the
-4-
Design Review Board or designated-in-a specific sign program for the building in -"=
which the business or organization is located.
Sactinn 11_
Section 16.22.150, paragraph E, is hereby amended to read as follows:
16.22.150
E. Location, parallel to the exterior wall adjacent to the North or South
Frontage Roads subject to the approval of the Design Review Board.
Section 12.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance
is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it
would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts,
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
Cor~inn 1Z
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is
necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the
inhabitants thereof.
Section 14.
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code
of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which
has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective
date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as
commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted.
The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this 7th day of November
1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 7th day of
November
1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this 7th day of November 1989•
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-5-
.~ ~ .._
--- ----- -INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON-SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED "-
this day of
1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-6-
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 30, 1989
SUBJECT: Bed and Breakfast Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1989
At their November 13, 1989 meeting, the Planning and Environmental
Commission unanimously recommended approval of the new ordinance
regulating Bed and Breakfasts. The Planning and Environmental
Commission set a deadline for Bed and Breakfasts to receive a
Conditional Use Permit of 6 months after ordinance adoption (Section
18); added Single Family and Two Family to the Special Development
District Section (Section 15) and changed the word "accommodation unit"
to "bedroom" in Section 17 B(1). They also incorporated the revisions
as discussed with Council at the September 12, 1989 worksession. (See
attached November 13 memo to PEC).
We feel that the proposed ordinance incorporates all of the concerns
the Council and Planning and Environmental Commission have expressed.
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 13, 1989
SUBJECT: Bed and Breakfast Regulations
I. BACKGROUND
On September 12, 1989, the Town Council and Planning Commission
held a joint worksession with the planning staff to come to a
consensus on the final direction of Bed and Breakfast regulations.
A number of issues that had previously troubled the Town Council
were resolved at this meeting. There was a consensus that there
should be regulations regarding Bed and Breakfasts, that a Bed and
Breakfast use has characteristics differentiating it from short
term rentals, and that neighbors and condominium associations
should be required to approve in writing a Conditional Use Permit
application for a Bed and Breakfast when common property is
involved.
It was also agreed at the September meeting that a parking
requirement of 1 space for the first bedroom, plus one-half space
for each additional bedroom, plus one space for the Bed and
Breakfast proprietor was appropriate. Furthermore, there was
general agreement that Multi-family zone districts were acceptable
locations for Bed and Breakfasts as long as the parking
requirements are met. It was emphasized that the parking proposed
to meet the requirement must be reserved and designated for that
condominium or townhouse only. Finally, the PEC and Town Council
agreed that signage would be restricted to one residential name
plate sign as currently allowed in all residential areas. This
type of sign cannot contain any advertising and is restricted to
one-half square foot per Single Family or Duplex structure or one-
half square foot for each Multi-family unit.
II. THE PROPOSAL
Attached, please find a copy of formerly proposed Ordinance No. 31
of 1989 dealing with the regulation of Bed and Breakfasts. This
is the ordinance that the Council rejected on second reading on
March 21, 1989 to re-discuss the issue with the Planning
Commission. I have made revisions to this ordinance as per the
agreements reached at the September 12th joint worksession. As
now proposed, the ordinance:
o allows B&B's to be located in zone districts allowing multi-
family dwelling units (Sections 4 - 15).
o continues to require B&B's to receive a Conditional Use
Permit.
-~
o amends parking requirements as stated above (Sections
17 (B) 1) .
o allows for a residential name plate sign only (Section
17(B)4).
o requires the written approval of other property owners when a
B&B proposes the use of property or facilities owned in
common or jointly with other property owners (Section
17 (B) 5) .
o provides a procedure for violations and Conditional Use
Permit revocation (Section 17 (C)).
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
While the staff continues to disagree that Bed and Breakfasts are
appropriate in Multi-family zone districts, we feel it is
imperative for the Town to adopt legislation allowing Bed and
Breakfasts to legally operate in Vail. The staff is strongly in
favor of Bed and Breakfasts as an efficient use of residential
units in a resort community. Bed and Breakfasts often provide a
high quality and low cost accommodation alternative in resort
areas and we feel they can be a very positive addition to Vail's
lodging community.
However, we cannot endorse locating Bed and Breakfasts in higher
density housing developments due to the potential negative impacts
to surrounding owners as well as the general lack of ambiance
these Bed and Breakfasts would tend to provide. Nevertheless, we
recommend that the Planning and Environmental Commission
recommend approval to the Council of the revisions to Ordinance
No.2 Series of 1989, in an effort to adopt responsible regulations
supporting Bed and Breakfasts in Vail.
W
ORDINANCE NO. 31
Series of 1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18 OF
THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING
SECTION 18.58.310, SHORT TERM RENTAL ACCOMMODATION UNIT
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR BED AND BREAKFAST
OPERATIONS UNDER CERTAIN PROVISIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
AND TO DEFINE BED AND BREAKFAST AND SETTING FORTH
DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to allow bed and~breakfas~
operations under certain conditions and in certain locations within
the Town of Vail; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that .bed and breakfast operations
operated under certain conditions provide high quality and desirable
lodging appropriate for a resort community; and
WHEREAS, policies within the Town of wail Land Use Plan support
the provision of high quality lodging utilizing existing facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental commission has reviewed
and recommended changes to the zoning code to accommodate bed and
breakfast uses as contained herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 18.10.030 Single Family (SFR) District--Conditional Uses shall
be amended to add the following:
G. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 3.
Section 18.13.030 Primary/Secondary (P/S) District--Conditional Uses
shall be amended to add the following:
F. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 4.
Section 18.14.030 Residential Cluster (R/C) District--Conditional Uses
shall be amended to add the following:
H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
0.
.~
Section 5.
Section 18.16.030 Low Density Multiple Family (LDMF) District--
Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following:
H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 6.
Section 18.18.030 Medium Density Multi-Family (MDMS) District--
Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following:
L. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 7.
Section 18.20.030 High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District--
Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following:
L. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 8.
Section 18.22.030 Public Accommodation (PA) District--Conditional Uses
shall be amended to add the following:
O. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 9.
Section 18.24.060 Commercial Core I (CC1) District--Conditional Uses -
Generally shall be amended to add the following:
E. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 10.
Section 18.26.040 Commercial Core II (CCII) District--Conditional Uses
- Generally shall be amended to add the following:
H. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 11.
Section 18.27.030 Commercial Core III j(CCIII) District--Conditional
Uses shall be amended to add the following:
P. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
2
Section 12.
Section 18.28.040 Commercial Service Center (CSC) District--
Conditional Uses shall be amended to add the following:
K. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 13.
Section 18.29.030 (A) Arterial Business District (ABD)--Conditional
Uses shall be amended to add the following:
BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310.
Section 14.
Section 18.39.050 (A) Ski Base/Recreation District--Conditional Uses
shall be amended to add the following:
12 BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 15.
Chapter 18.40 Special Development District of the Vail Municipal code
shall be amended to add Section 18.40.160 as follows:
Section 18.40.160 Bed and Breakfast--Conditional Use Permit
ANY SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONTAINING MULTI-FAMILY, SINGLE
FAMILY OR TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR A
BED AND BREAKFAST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ACCORDING TO CHAPTER
18.60 AND AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION 18.58.310.
Section 16.
Section 18.09.030 Hillside Residential (HR) District--Conditional
Uses shall be amended to add the following:
E. BED AND BREAKFAST AS FURTHER REGULATED BY SECTION
18.58.310.
Section 17.
Section 18.58.310 Short Term Rental Accommodation Unit shall be
repealed and re-enacted as follows:
Section 18.58.310 BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS
A. DEFINITION
BED AND BREAKFAST MEANS A BUSINESS WHICH ACCOMMODATES GUESTS
IN A DWELLING UNIT IN WHICH THE BED AND BREAKFAST PROPRIETOR
LIVES ON THE PREMISES AND IS IN RESIDENCE DURING THE BED AND
BREAKFAST USE. A BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATION MAY SHORT TERM
3
_. ~ ~.
RENT SEPARATELY UP TO 3 BEDROOMS OR A MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE
OF 900 SQUARE FEET OF THE DWELLING UNIT. BED AND BREAKFAST
OPERATIONS SHALL ONLY BE PERMITTED TO ACCOMMODATE A FAMILY
AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18.04.110.
B. LOCATION AND CRITERIA
BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED AS A CONDITIONAL
USE IN THOSE ZONE DISTRICTS AS SPECIFIED IN TITLE 18 OF THE
VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE. IF PERMITTED AS A CONDITIONAL USE
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 18.60 OF THIS CODE, BED AND BREAKFAST
OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
1. OFF STREET PARKING SHALL BE REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS:
1 SPACE FOR THE OWNER/PROPRIETOR PLUS 1 SPACE FOR THE
FIRST BEDROOM RENTED PLUS 1/2 SPACE FOR EACH ADDITIONAL
BEDROOM RENTED.
2. ENCLOSED TRASH FACILITIES AND REGULAR GARBAGE REMOVAL
SERVICE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
3. REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL
PARKING IS STRONGLY DISCOURAGED.
4. EACH BED AND BREAKFAST SHALL BE ALLOWED ONE RESIDENTIAL
NAMEPLATE SIGN AS DEFINED AND REGULATED BY THE TOWN OF
VAIL SIGN CODE.
5. IF A BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATION SHALL USE PROPERTY OR
FACILITIES OWNED IN COMMON OR JOINTLY WITH OTHER
PROPERTY OWNERS SUCH AS PARKING SPACES OR A DRIVEWAY IN
DUPLEX SUBDIVISION, BY WAY OR EXAMPLE AND NOT
LIMITATION, THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OTHER PROPERTY
OWNER, OWNERS, OR APPLICABLE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION SHALL
BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
C. VIOLATION
IF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DETERMINES THAT THE
PROVISION OF THIS SECTION 18.58.310 OR ANY CONDITION OF THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ARE BEING VIOLATED, HE SHALL GIVE
NOTICE OR REVOCATION TO THE BED AND BREAKFAST PERMITTEE IN
WRITING DESCRIBING IN REASONABLE DETAIL THE VIOLATION
ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED OR TO EXIST AND SHALL SERVE
4
.~
THE NOTICE ON THE PERMITTEE IN PERSON OR BY FIRST CLASS MAIL
AT THE ADDRESS LISTED IN THE APPLICATION FOR THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT.
IF THE PERMITTEE DISAGREES WITH THE DETERMINATION OF THE
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS,
HE MAY APPEAL SUCH DETERMINATION BY FILING A WRITTEN NOTICE
OF APPEAL WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL PLANNING COMMISSION NO LATER
THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE NOTICE OF REVOCATION. AT
SAID HEARING THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHALL BE WITH THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO PROVE THE NOTICE OF REVOCATION BY A
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. AFTER THE HEARING, THE
PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL CONFIRM OR REVERSE THE NOTICE OR
VIOLATION ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
IF ANY PERMITTEE FAILS TO EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF APPEAL TO
THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THE NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED A FINAL
ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVOKING THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT.
Section 18.
Compliance
It shall be unlawful for a bed and breakfast operation to do business
without a conditional use permit from the Planning and Environmental
Commission after June 12, 1989 or to operate in violation of any of
the provisions of the Vail Municipal Code.
Section 19. Discontinuance
Any bed and breakfast operation which is discontinued for a period of
twelve months, regardless of any intent to resume operation of use,
shall not be resumed thereafter, and any future use of the site or
structures thereon shall conform with the provisions of this title.
Section 20.
The Town Council, the applicant, adjacent property owner or the Town
Manager, may appeal/call up to the Town Council for review any
decision made by the Planning and Environmental Commission regarding a
Conditional Use Permit for Bed and Breakfast as per Section
18.60.070.
Section 21.
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall
5
~i
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance;
and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this
ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be
declared invalid.
Section 22.
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare
of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof.
Section 23.
The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the
Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any
right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred
prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any
other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the
provision repealed or repealed and re-enacted. The repeal of any
provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance
previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS
day of
1989, and a public hearing shall be held on this
ordinance on the day of
1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this day of
1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this
day of
1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
6
ORDINANCE NO. 32 - - ~-
Series of 1989
AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM
THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, BOOTH CREEK LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND, COMMUNITIES FOR DRUG-FREE
EAGLE VALLEY FUND, SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT FUND,
VAIL MARKETING FUND, LIONSHEAD MALL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FUND,AND THE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, OF THE 1989
BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID
APPROPIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN.
WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal
year 1989 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or
anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance
No. 31, Series of 1988, adopting the 1989 Budget and Financial
Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and,
WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not
budgeted for previously; and,
WHEREAS, The Town Manager has certified to the Town
Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the
appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the
Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the
Town of Vail; and,
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town
Council finds that it should make certain supplemental
appropriations as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of
the Town of Vail, Colorado, that:
Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town
of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following
supplemental appropriations for the 1989 Budget and Financial
Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the
expenditure of said appropriations as follows:
-1-
FUND AMOUNT
General Fund $1,660,000
Special Parking Assessment Fund 500,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 3,158,723
Vail Marketing Fund 23,500
Communities for Drug-free Eagle County Fund 11,000
Booth Creek Local Improvement District Fund 373,700
Lionshead Mall Assessment District Fund 21,000
$5,747,923
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS
5th day of December 1989, and a public hearing shall be
held on this ordinance on the 5th day of December , 1989,
at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building,
Vail Colorado.
Ordered published in full this
1989.
day of
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED
this day of
1989.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 21, 1989
SUBJ: Sign variance request for the Finishing Touch Furniture
Showroom, located in the Inn at West Vail
Applicant: The Finishing Touch
I. THE REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 16.22.070(C)
of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. This section of the code
addresses the allowable height of projecting and hanging signs,
and in fact limits the allowable height to fifteen feet above
existing grade.
The existing awning and associated signage is approximately 25
feet off the ground and thus requires a height variance of 10
feet.
II. BACKGROUND ON REQUEST
In early July, the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom moved into
a new lease space in the Inn at Vail, formerly the Raintree Inn,
and erected a sign and awning without Town of Vail approval. A
decision was made by the Town of Vail to allow the applicant to
maintain the existing awning while he submitted for a sign
variance. The original request to the Design Review Board was a
request to receive approval for the existing awning as well as
two other proposed signs.
On July 5, 1989, the Design Review Board heard a sign variance
request from the Finishing Touch Furniture Showroom. At that
time, the application entailed a variance request from three
sections of the Town of Vail Sign Code:
Section 16.22.070 B. Size
Section 16.22.070 C. Height
Section 16.22.070 D. Number of signs
At that meeting, and after a lengthy discussion, the applicant
tabled the request in order to further review and amend the
application. After several meetings with the Design Review
Board and the staff, the applicant has now decided to eliminate
the directional sign and the identification sign adjacent to the
retail entrance, and limit the request for a variance to the
allowable sign height. The amended application includes only
one 20 square foot sign, located 25 feet above grade on the
existing awning.
III. FINDINGS AND STAFF RESPONSES
Before the Board acts on a variance application, the applicant
must prove physical hardship and the Board must find that,
A. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to
the land, buildings, topography, vegetation, sign
structures or other matters on adjacent lots or within the
adjacent right-of-way which would substantially restrict
the effectiveness of the sign in question; provided,
however, that such special circumstances or conditions are
unique to the particular business or enterprise to which
the applicant desires to draw attention and do not apply
generally to all businesses or enterprises.
Staff Response
The staff cannot support the degree of variance which is
being requested in this particular application. Although
the applicant has reduced the degree of variance by
eliminating the directional and identificaiton signs
originally proposed adjacent to the retail entrance, the
main problem the staff has had with this application is the
existing awning. As we also stated in the July 5, 1989
memo, we feel the size and height of the awning requested
along the North Frontage Road is grossly in excess of what
is required for this business and does in fact draw undue
attention to itself. The staff feels that both the awning
and the square footage of sign that is displayed along the
North Frontage Road is excessive and should be reduced in
size.
B. That special circumstances were not created by the
applicant or anyone in privy to the applicant.
Staff Response•
The main entrance to this retail space is located on the
west side of the building. Although this is a difficult
location for access off of the North Frontage Road, the
staff does not believe that this warrants a height variance
to the degree proposed by the applicant. The staff
previously agreed to support a sign location on the west
side of the south wall to mitigate the entrance location.
However, the applicant has withdrawn that request.
C. That the granting of the variance will be in general harmony
with the purpose of this title and will not be materially
detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinit
to adjacent property, to the neighborhood, or to the public
welfare in general.
Staff Response°
The staff feels that this request goes beyond the intent of
the Sign Code for the Commercial Core III area. The Town
Council, in the past, has granted several variances in the
West Vail area, and while the staff believes that some
variance may be appropriate for this business, we feel that
the applicant has taken the proposed amendments to his
original application in the wrong direction. The height
and the number of signs are two of the most important
criteria in the Sign Code. While the applicant has
eliminated the need for variance in the number of signs, he
is still requesting a substantial variance in height. We
feel that as a first floor retail store with additional
second floor footage, we would be setting a dangerous
precedent to support a height variance of this magnitude in
the Commercial Core III area.
D. The variance applied for does not depart from the
provisions of this title any more than is required to
identify the applicant's business or use
Staff Response:
We feel that the existing awning displayed across the front
of this building goes well beyond the provisions of this
title and is higher and larger than what the staff believes
would be required to identify the applicant's business. As
we have stated in our previous memorandum, we feel that in
order for the staff to be able to support a variance for
this location, the sign on the south elevation of the
building must be reduced in size and height.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Community Development Department recommends denial of this
proposed variance. We feel that the height of the proposed sign
along the North Frontage Road grossly exceeds what is required
to identify this business, that the sign calls undue attention
to itself, and that the existing hardship is not adequate to
support a variance of this degree from the Town of Vail Sign
Code.
* See attached letter for the Design Review Board's action at their
October 18, 1989 public hearing.
* See attached letter for the Design Review Board's action at their November 29,
1989 public hearing.
tuwo of uai
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138
(303)479-2139
Mr. Jim Wilson, Owner
Finishing Touch
2211 North Frontage Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Wilson,
office of community development
At their public hearing of October 18, 1989, the Town of Vail
Design Review Board, by a vote of 4-l, recommended denial of your
requested sign variance. The Design Review Board made findings
consistent with sections III - A, B, C, and D of the October 18,
1989 staff memorandum. This recommendation will be presented to
the Vail Town Council at their November 7, 1989 evening meeting.
The Design Review Board also reviewed the design of your proposed
"awning" and by a vote of 5-0 unanimously denied the request.
The Board found that your proposal was not consistent with
Section 16.16.020 of the Town's Sign Code - Not Dominating - "The
sign should not visually dominate the structure to which it
belongs or call undue attention to itself."
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me
at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
~ ~~~
Mike Mollica
Town Planner
xc: Peter Patten
Larry Eskwith
Bruce Allen
town o
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2138
(303) 479-2139
Nov. 29, 1989
Mr. Jim Wilson, Owner
Finishing Touch
2211 N. Frontage Rd.
Vail, Colo. 81657
Dear Mr. Wilson,
office of community development
At their public hearing of November 29, 1989, the Town of`Vail Design
Review Board, by a vote of 4-0, unanimously denied your request for
design approval of your proposed awning and associated signage. The
board found that the proposal was not consistent with Section 16.16.020
of the Town's Sign Code - Not Dominating - "The sign should not
visually dominate the structure to which it belongs or call undue
attention to itself."
For your convenience, please find attached the appeal procedure as
outlined in the Town's zoning code, Section 18.54.090.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me at 479-
2138. -
Sincerely,
®~~
Mike Mollica
Planner II
MM: as
cc: Peter Patten
John Dunn
Bruce Allen
LAW OFFICES
COSGRIFF, DUNN &ABPLANALP
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
JOHN W. DUNN
PETER COSGRIFF
ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP, JR.
ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN
TIMOTHY H. BERRY
TAM RA B. NOTTINGHAM
VAIL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SUITE 300
P. O. Box 2299
VAIL, COLORADO 81658
TELEPHONE: (3031 476-7552
TE LECOPIER: (303) 476-4765
IN LEADVI LLE~
COSGRIFF, DUNN b BERRY
P. O• BOX II
LEADVILLE,COLO RADO 80461
(7191 486-1885
Iv'ovember 30, 1989
Mr. Mike Mollica
Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Mike:
Re: The Finishing Touch of Vail, Inc.
The purpose of this letter is to appeal to the
Town Council the adverse decision of the Design Review Board
on November 29, 1989, relating to the design of The
Finishing Touch Sign.
Yours very truly,
JWD:kem
cc: Ms. Pam Brandmeyer
Mr. James R. Wilson
COSGRIFF, DUNN & ABPLANALP
John W. Dunn
THE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION IS DUNN 6 ABPLANALP, P. C. IN VAIL.
ORIENTATION SCHEDULE FOR COUNCIL
Tuesday, November 28 - Council Organizational Meeting
Revised 11/30/89
Monday, December 4 - Mayor's Breakfast
7:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers
Tuesday, December 5 - Work Session, Legal Orientation
Home Rule, Charter Review, Ordinances, Relationship
between Council its appointed Boards, Discussion
regarding how meetings are run/Litigation Update in
Executive Session
- Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m.
Tuesday, December 12 - Work Session, Five Year Budget/Investment Policy/Employee
Compensation Orientation
Tuesday, December 19 - Work Session, Community Development/Public Works/Library
Orientation
Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m.
Tuesday, December 26 - Work Session, Police/Fire Orientation
Tuesday, January 2 - Work Session
- Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m.
Tuesday, January 9 - Tour of Vail Mountain
Tuesday, January 16 - Work Session
- Evening Meeting, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, January 20 - Colorado Municipal League New Councilmember Orientation
Seminar (info will be coming out mid-Dec.)
Sheraton Lakewood
Tuesday, January 23 - Work Session
Tuesday, January 30 - Goal Setting Session - Prioritize Land Purchase Issues
ALL DAY MEETING in off-site hotel conference room
Unless noted otherwise above, all Work Sessions will be held in the Council
Chambers, beginning at 2:00 p.m.
,~
,y .,
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
12/01/89
Page 1
TOPIC
UESTIONS
FOLLOW-UP SO
IONS
8/1 BANNER POLES IN THE VILLAGE AND
LIONSHEAD (request: Slevin)
8/1 STREET ENTERTAINMENT
8/8 UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FOR
ARTERIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
8/8 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION
(request: Lapin)
I
8/15 VUCWD/TOV LAND CONTRACT
8/15 NO SMOKING ORDINANCE
9/5 CALL UP PROCEDURE FOR PEC AND
DRB DECISIONS (request: Steinberg)
10/17,VVF FINANCIAL REPORT
11/7 SURVEY CREW BUDGET ITEM
(request: Steinberg/Rose)
11/14'~PRE-QUALIFYING CONTRACTORS FOR
VTRC (request: Rose)
I
PETER: Arrange location and placement of permanent
banner poles at any location other than Pepi's
and in Lionshead.
Have asked Ampersand for design for Lionshead east entry.
Will explore with Ampersand alternative banner pole
locations in Village. Peter checked with Ampersand, and
they are working on it. Village issue will be included
in the Village Streetscape Plan. Answer on Lionshead by
Dec. 22.
PAM: No more rock 'n roll. Perhaps no more jazz?
KRISTAN: Provide costs to individuals to convert to
underground. Provide firm number for TOV's
portion by budget time. Inventory all above-
ground wiring.
LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for
annexation.
RON: Contract in final stages of negotiation.
LARRY/SUSAN: Organize study group to examine
voluntary options.
LARRY: Work out wording to disallow the call
up procedure for PEC and DRB decisions to be
allowed without consensus.
RON: Request financial report from VUF.
STAN/STEVE: Bring back survey crew issue before
hiring.
RON/STAN/LARRY: Develop procedure through interview
and review process rather than deal with time
restrictions caused by competitive bid process,
based on profit percentages, open books, etc.
Requires vote by Council to approve.
Review meeting held September 20. Business survey will
be developed by Dec. 15.
Received letter from New Electric detailing costs for each
property. Community Development will write letters to
property owners for their response. Council will discuss
when we have a response. Peter will report on results of
follow-up on Dec. 8.
Annexation map is being produced. Susan has completed
research and submitted updated plats to Dan Corcoran.
Discuss annexing Interstate. Larry will call Dan Corcoran
on Dec. 1.
Larry and Jim Collins are working on contract.
Group to include Safeway and other retail outlets in
their scrutiny. Draft ordinance for public places other
than restaurants by Jan. 23.
Resolution is being developed. Larry and Peter will have a
solution by Dec. 15.
Written. Audit is just being completed.
Will discuss in December. Staff discussion on Dec. 4.
Will be discussed with Council on Dec. 19.
Included in architect's scope of services.
4
TOPIC
11/14 SALES TAX FOR FUND RAISING
EVENTS FOR NON-PROFIT ENTITIES
11/28 LIONSHEAD REZONING/PARKING
(request: Lapin)
11/28 VAIL COMMUNITY TELEVISION GROUP
APPOINTMENT
11/28 BERRY CREEK SITE STUDY
12/1 REPLACE ALPINE STANDARD FLAGS
AND REPAIR POLES
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
QUESTIONS
STEUE/DANI: Bring back to Council for more
discussion.
PETER/LARRY: Pursue rezoning to disallow use of
parking structure in lieu of providing on-site
parking (i.e., L'Ostello, formerly the Enzian).
RON: Contact group about the TOV's ability to
advertise for volunteers/applicants who can then
be appointed by Council.
RON: Obtain written proposal from Peter Jamar
covering scope of services - by 12/5/89.
STAN: Arrange for replacement of flags and repair
of poles.
FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
Will be discussed December 12.
12/01/89
Page 2
To be presented at first Council meeting in February.
In Council packets.
Public Works will take care of the problem.
o~~~r~
595 East' VaiC Va[fe~ ~riv~--
NOVEMBER 24, 1989
REC'~ NOV 2 9 egg
Vaif, Co[orac[o 81657 (303) 47b-5651 Fax (303) 47b-4g82
MR. RON PHII.LIPS
TOWN MANAGER
THE TOWN OF VAIL
75 S. FRONTAGE ROAD WEST
MAIL, CO 81657
DEAR RON:
I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT A PROFESSIONAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
WE HAVE IN VAIL. AS YOU KNOW WE HAD A FIRE AT MANOR VAIL ON
TUESDAY, AND DICK DURAN AND HIS CREW RESPONDED IN A TIMELY AND
PROFESSIONAL MANNER. THEY HAD THE FIRE UNDER CONTROL IN A VERY
SHORT PERIOD OF TIlVIE. DUE TO THEIR DII.IGENCE, WE SUSTAINED A
MINIMUM OF DAMAGE TO THE PREMISES AND TO THE UNITS DIRECTLY ABOVE
THE FIRE AREA.
THE VAIL COMMUNITY IS FORTUNATE TO HAVE SUCH AN EXCELLENT FIRE
DEPARTMENT. PLEASE EXTEND MY PERSONAL THANKS, AS WELL AS THE
i~~~PVr'~ yr hI.L Or' C1:,~R G`i~:'I~TEI'~S FOR Tr~.ASSrS'I'~~PdCE :~~ .Fr'EIVEL.
SINCERELY,
MANOR VAIL CONDOMIIVIUIVI ASSOCIATION
JAC RUSH, CHA
GING AGENT
r~
Town of Avon P. O. Box 975, Avon, CO 81620 (303) 949-4280
RECD iVOV 2 9 1989
November 28, 1989
Dear TV Translator Committee Member:
Eagle Valley TV Translator Committee Chairman, Jerry Davis recently sent
a letter to the Eagle County Commissioners requesting a meeting to discuss
the matter of a special election regarding TV Translators. Enclosed is a
copy of that letter.
This letter is notification that a meeting with the Eagle County Commissioners
has been scheduled for 2:00 P.P~., Tuesday, December 19, 1989, to discuss this
matter. ALL TV Committee members are urged to attend this meeting if at all
possible.
Please, do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Norman !food
Secretary/Treasurer
Eagle Valley TV Translator Committee
N41/cp
encl:
Copy/File
.v L. .-
Town o4 Avon P. O. Box 975, Avon, CO 61620 (303) 949-4250
November 14, 1989
Board of County Commissioners
Eagle County
P.O. Box 850
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Re: Translator Television
Dear Commissionerso
A great deal of time, energy, and money hav_e_ been_spent _on_._ _ _
the issue of television-translator services to residents
of eagle County. i-n the- past three ~to -.four .years, =and the -
issue has yet to.be..resolved. -
The Eagle County Television Committee .attempted to create a
special district to provide broadcast television.. This effort
to create the district was denied by District Court on the
basis that such a district can not duplicate services that
are being provided in an entity included in the district.
This committee represents a majority of citizens, and .the County.
Its membership includes representatives from the Towns of Eagle,
Gypsum, Avon, Vail, Minturn and Red Cliff, and a number of
metro districts. The committee Baas supported financially by
the governments represented, including Eagle County, and by
many private contributions.
The members have. worked long and hard in the past years. We
have raised funds for legal services, and extensive engineering
studies which will provide reliable services to most of the
county. We engaged a financial expert so the program for
translator television to the residents of the county would be
on a sound fiscal basis.
~~ °•
Board of County Commissioners
Translator Television
page 2
Under lying all this work was a belief by the committee
members that there was a need for broadcast television in the
community. We received much support in spirit by many
residents who indicated that translator television was important
because many of the residents cannot afford the cost of
satellite dishes or the expense of ever increasing rates of
cable service. We still believe there is a need for alternate .
television services.
The residents of Eagle County have not had the opportunity to
express their desires and concerns on this matter. Except,
in the public vote in Vail, where the public voted in favor
of translator television by a two to one margin.
The Colorado Legislature recognized the need to provide
broadcast (translator) television back in the 60's and adopted
statutes:
Article 7, Part 1, CRS, authorized the county to acquire, own,
sell, create and operate televis_ion_.-relay=and_translator facilities
(29-7-1~1, CRS.) -
= 29-7-101, CRS,-authorizes the county to receive funds from private .~
or public sources for-the purpose of constructing and operating
- television transmission_and relay .booster facilities.
29-7-106, CRS, exempts a tax levy for the purpose of television
relay and translator facilities from tax limitations prescribed
for the county.
In brief, the county has the authority to establish and operate
a translator television system, tax for the service of that system,
and this tax will not affect the general fund as budgeted for
the county. -
L
Board of County Commissioners ~~
Translator Television
page 3
Our proposal is~:
The county conduct a special election: with this question
on the ballota
"Shall the county establish a translator television
system for the residents of Eagle County and
increase the mill levy by .-6 mills to provide
funding for this service ?"
The results of this election would:
1. If the vote is "no" then the issue is dead
and put to rest.
2. If the vote is "yes" then the county creates
the television translator system which
should be operated by a committee appointed
by the Commissioners.
- The crea~iori of this system would serve the majority of the -
resi__dents.of~the county~as soon as the system is in place, ~ -
-- and eventually it could serve all of the residents. Additionally,
the money collected from~•Basalt-E1 Jebel could be used to
pay Garfield County for the services they are supplying those
residents. -
The Commissioners are authorized to conduct an election as an
advisory vote, and as a budget vote to exceed the 5.5 limitation.
With Commissioners cooperation, the election can be called and
this matter can be resolved within 60 days.
We appreciate .the Commissioners consideration in this matter
and urge then to move as quickly as possible.
We request a ~^eeting with the Coru~-issioners at the earliest
possible time to discuss this matter and will call in a few days
to confirm a date.
Sincer ,
J rry`Davis, Chairman
Eagle Valley T.V. Translator System
PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, I NC.
PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH
November 29, 1989
Kevin Lindahl
Eagle County Attorney
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Dear Kevin:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm our agreement to provide
Professional Services in relation to the purchase and development of.
the Berry Creek Fifth Filing and the Miller Ranch as a county-wide
recreational complex.
SCOPE OF SERVICES:
As agreed to on November 24 we shall provide the following services:
1. Revise the conceptual plans previously prepared for the site and
indicate potential alternative plans for a Phase One development
within the Berry Creek Fifth Filing property.
2. Meet with the Task Force to review the Phase One alternatives and
select a preferred concept.
3. Upon selection of a preferred concept plan for Phase One we shall
prepare cost estimates for the development of Phase One. These
cost estimates will include:
a. Land purchase price for. both the Berry Creek Fifth Filing
and Miller Ranch.
b. Estimated costs of the provision of infrastructure
including roads, water, sewer, electric service, gas
service, etc.
c. Estimated costs of detailed engineering, planning, legal and
architectural fees.
Suite 308, Vail National Bank Building
108 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ (303) 476-7154
KPV1n 'Lindahl -.. _..__...__ __...._.._-- -------._-- _
Eagle County Attorney
November 29, 1989
Page 2
d. Estimated cost of facilities to be provided within Phase
One.
e. Estimated operational costs for the facilities to be'
operated within Phase One.
4. Upon completion of the concept plan and estimated costs we shall
assist Eagle County and the Task Force in conducting public
meetings to present the plan and cost estimates to the general
public. It is anticipated that three public meetings will be
held: one in Avon, one in Eagle, and one in El Jebel. A slide
presentation will be prepared for review at the public meetings
in order to convey the information to the public.
SCHEDULE°
The following schedule is anticipated at this time:
1. Revise Plans
2. Meet with Task Force
3. Prepare Cost Estimates
4. Public Meetings
FEE°
Nov. 27 - Dec. 1
Dec. 1
Dec. 1 - 22
Jan. 1 - 15
The total fee for the above described services shall be a maximum of
$7,500.00 plus expenses estimated at $500.00. Fees and expenses shall
be billed in accordance with the attached rate and expense schedule.
If the above meets with your approval please sign where indicated
below and return one copy for my files. Please let me know if you
have any questions. As we discussed I anticipate utilizing the
staff°s of the three governmental entities plus the VMRD staff to
assist as much as possible in the preparation of estimated development
and operational costs.
Sincer~y,
ter Ja~ar, AICP
PJ:ne
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
Kevin Lindahl Date
~,
PETER JAMAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS, RESEARCH
August 1, 1989
RATE AND EXPENSE SCHEDULE
RATE:
Principal
Planner/Designer
Drafting/Graphics
Clerical
• Sub-Consultants
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES:
$75.00/hour
$50.00/hour
$35.00/hour
$20.00/hour
Passed through at
sub-consultants
regular rates
Actual expenditures made by the employees of Peter Jamar
Associates, Inc. for the Project are reimbursable at cost plus 10
percent for coordination and processing, and will be billed in
addition to professional service fees. Examples of reimbursable
expenses are transportation and living expenses while traveling
in connection with the Project, long distance telephone calls,
xerox copies, reproduction and printing costs, supplies, postage
and photography.
METHOD OF PAYMENTe
Professional services are billed monthly at the above
scheduled rates for hours of work performed on the Project.
Payment is due 15 days following receipt of invoice. Invoices
unpaid after 30 days are subject to a service charge, which is
1 1/2% per month, and all costs of collection including
reasonable attorney°s fees. Peter Jamar Associates, Inc.
reserves the right to suspend work on the Project if payment is
not received within 45 days from invoice date.
Suite 308, Vail National Bank l3uilding
108 South Frontage Road West . Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ (303) 476-7154
TO: The Art in Public Places Board
FROM: Kristan Pritz / Community Development Department
DATE: November 28, 1989
RE: Upcoming Art in Public Places Board Meeting, December 4,
1989.
Our next Art in Public Places Board Meeting will start at the
Lionshead Parking Structure at the Vail Valley Arts Council
Office. The office is located on the lower level of the
structure (the corner closest to the ice arena - southeast).
The site visit will begin at 8:30 a.m.. Randy Milhoan and Pam
Story will discuss the idea for the Mural with the board. The
meeting will be continued at the Small Conference Room in the
Municipal Building.
AGENDA
DECEMBER 4, 1989
8:30 a.m.: Meet at Lionshead Parking Structure, Vail Valley
Arts Council Office to review concept for a
Public Art Project sponsored by the Vail Valley
Arts Council.
9:00 a.m.: Small Conference Room
1. Approval of Minutes of November 20, 1989
AIPP Meeting.
2. Conceptual Review of the Vail Valley Arts
Council Mural.
3. Discussion of Council support for the AIPP
decision on Jim Hoy's "See or Ski Colorado
Sculpture".
4. Update on Public Art Proposals.
a. Bird of Paradise.
b. Parking Structure Public Art Meeting.
c. Post Office Meeting.
d. 10th Mountain Division Sculpture.
r
.~~
Art in Public Places
November 20, 1989
Minutes
Present
Sally Sheridan
Jim Cotter
Fitzhugh Scott
Tom Steinberg
Randy Milhoan
Jamie McCluskie
Laura Nash
Pam Story
Roselyne Swig
Absent
Kathy Warren
Staff Present
Kristan Pritz
The Art in Public Places Board meeting began at 8:30 a.m. with a site
visit to the Covered Bridge. The members met with the artist, Jim Hoy,
to discuss his proposed sculpture for the site.
At 9:00 a.m., the meeting reconvened at the Municipal Building.
Pam Story requested that all of her public art information be sent to
their home address at 3230 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, Colorado.
Item No. 1 Approval of November 6, 1989 minutes.
Tom Steinberg made a motion, seconded by Roselyne Swiq, to approve the
November 6, 1989 minutes The motion passed unanimously.
Item No. 2 Review of See or Ski Colorado Sculpture
Artist• Jim Hoy
Jim Hoy gave background on his career and interest in sculpture. He
described his sculpture park project in Frazier, Colorado.
He stated that the concept for See or Ski was 100% art, but also 1000
marketing for tourism. He explained that the piece was presented to
the City of Denver for the new airport or Stapleton. Due to the fact
that the new airport will take 5 years, he could not wait. He thought
he would contact Vail first to see if they were interested in the
proposal. He also contacted Vail Associates about the project. VA
directed Jim to work with Kristan at the Town of Vail.
Jim stated that if Vail accepted the piece, he would then present the
proposal to Continental Airlines. He explained that no other community
has seen the piece or been asked if they were interested in it. He
also emphasized that there would be publicity in magazines on this
project.
s ~- - ..
As the artist, he would want to retain the copyright.
Kristan asked for a description of the construction for the piece. Jim
stated that the piece would be made out of 3/8 inch aluminum. The
aluminum would be sprayed with copper and then with brass. The brass
would be wire brushed. The entire sculpture would be finished with
epoxy to resist scuffing. He stated that the sculpture would not have
a shiny look. Structurally, the piece can withstand people hanging off
of the ski pole ends and arms of the skier. The base of the sculpture
will be made of a material call "design cast." The core of the base
would be Styrofoam. The sculpture itself has been designed to be
placed on an aluminum platform. This allows the sculpture to be
forklifted and moved. The base will also allow for protection from
snow removal.
After Jim finished with his presentation, the Board asked questions.
Roselyne asked what relationship Continental Airlines has with Vail.
Tom Steinberg responded that at this time, there was no relationship.
Roselyne felt that due to fact that there was not a strong relationship
between Vail and Continental, that the piece was not unique to Vail.
Roselyne also asked about the copyright for the piece. She questioned
whether Vail would be deriving any benefits from the copyright
arrangement. Jim Hoy answered that prints of the sculpture could be
reproduced with his permission and used as a means to pay back the
donor of the artwork.
Roselyne asked who would pay for maintenance and site preparation
costs. Jim responded that he did not feel there would be any site
preparation costs. The maintenance cost would be minimal and he was
open to discussing the possibility of the artist or donor covering the
maintenance cost.
Jim Hoy felt that he should get some benefit from the reproductions or
posters, due to the fact that he is creating sculpture for free. He is
willing to work with Vail Associates and the Town on some type of a
copyright agreement.
Kristan asked that the Board comment on the sculpture in respect to the
site and artwork criteria.
Roselyne said that she wanted to discuss the site. She stated that she
disagreed with Jim Hoy that when you exit from the Parking Structure,
you do not have a strong image of where you are. Her opinion was that
the Covered Bridge, Clock Tower, Fountain and landscaping give a very
strong image of Vail. She felt this area was already very picturesque.
Roselyne commented that the materials for the sculpture seemed foreign
in the proposed location. She felt a decision should be made whether
this space needed to be more open or less open or should stay. as it is.
She expressed concern about the concept of site specific work versus
placing an artwork on a site. She felt the Covered Bridge area was a
site that seemed to warrant site specific artwork. Roselyne said that
there are not many spaces available for art in the Town of Vail. She
questioned whether to Town should consider having artists come in from
the very beginning and develop their artwork so that it would be site
specific.
Tom Steinberg said the artwork needed to fit into the Alpine village.
He felt the piece reminded him of a curio-shop type artwork. He stated
this artwork is not appropriate for this site. The quality is
lacking.
Randy Milhoan stated that he had received comments from the public
about the piece. The comments have not been favorable. Personally,
Randy does not like the piece.
Jim Cotter complemented Jim Hoy on his presentation. He appreciated
Jim's efforts and ideas. Randy stated that it was not absolutely
necessary to illustrate that Vail is a ski town by showing a skier.
However, he was not necessarily opposed to the concept of a skier.
Jim stated he liked the site specific approach.
Sally Sheridan thought the committee needed to regroup and think about
the site specific approach. She felt the sculpture crowded the site.
The skier concept was too limiting for Vail.
Kristan emphasized that comments should be related to the artwork and
site criteria.
Sally stated that she did not feel the proposal met the artwork
criteria of quality and innovation, as well as compatibility with
site.
Roselyne questioned what would happen to the sculpture after ten years.
Jim Hoy explained that he would like to be able to tell the art
contributor that the piece would be placed for a minimum of ten years
in Vail.
Roselyne recommended not accepting the piece as it did not meet the
following guidelines:
Section IX. A.
d. Relationship of proposed site to existing or future
architectural features and to natural features
g. Site design, including landscaping, drainage, grading,
lighting and seating considerations
Section IX. B.
1. Quality and Innovation
The consideration of highest priority is the inherent
artistic excellence and innovation of the artwork.
3. Compatibility With Site
Works of art should be compatible in style, scale,
material, form, and content with their surroundings, and
should form an overall relationship with the site.
., ,~
Roselyne said she would like to see the committee consider a few
important sites. The committee should pursue the opportunity for
artwork. She felt the obvious concepts should be set aside such as
fishing, skiing, hiking, etc. She felt the committee should look at
the community in a different way. What are the people in Vail like?
What kind of thinking do they represent? What image would Vail like to
project? Vail artwork does not necessarily need to relate to specific
activities in the community. Instead, the ideas of originality,
creativity, movement, could be expressed through artwork. She felt
some "blue-skying" was necessary to think about the big picture. She
said she hated to mention specific artists, but gave examples of
perhaps a sculpture by Calder that would be kinetic as well as stable.
She questioned would this be an image for Vail.
Jim Cotter stated that the first review was difficult.
Randy Milhoan commented that sites for the Art in Public Places program
are important and the Board needed to address them.
A motion was made by Randy Milhoan and seconded by Laura Nash to
disapprove the proposal per Sections IX, A, d and q, and IX, B, 1 and
3, of the Art In Public Places Guidelines. The vote was 8-1 to approve
the motion. Jamie McCluskie voted against the motion He felt that
the means used to set the piece in the site could make the proposal
suitable for approval.
The Board suggested that perhaps Vail Associates could place it on
their private land or somewhere on the mountain. Randy asked Jim Hoy
to let the Board know about progress on the Frazier Sculpture Park.
The Board thanked Jim Hoy for his proposal and professional
presentation. Jim Hoy thanked the Board for their time and effort in
reviewing his proposal.
Item No. 3 Mary Zimmerman presented a letter to the Board
concerning a sculpture by Lee Stark. The project will
be made locally at Battle Mountain Bronze in Minturn.
Kristan asked Mary to schedule a review at an upcoming
meeting.
Item No. 4 The Parking Structure project.
A motion was made by Jim Cotter and seconded by Fitzhugh Scott to
appoint four people to work on possible artwork proposals for the new
parking structure. The motion passed 9-0 Fitzhugh Scott, Randy
Milhoan, Laura Nash, and Jamie McCluskie were appointed to serve on
this committee.
The first meeting with Michael Barber Architects is scheduled for noon
on Monday, November 27th, in the small conference room.
.. '' ~w
Item No. 5 Follow up items.
Kristan was asked to set up a meeting with the Post Office owner.
Fitzhugh Scott, Roselyne Swig, and Tom Steinberg were asked to meet
with the owner of the Post Office.
Roselyne recommended that Kristan talk to the Washington State Program
staff. She suggested that slides be obtained. She also directed
Kristan to talk to the International Sculpture Committee for slides.
Roselyne mentioned the idea of "artwork on the ground." Mosaics and
pavings might be interesting art concepts to pursue for Vail.
Randy Milhoan recommended that Cheryl from the Colorado Council on the
Arts and Humanities be contacted concerning funding.
Roselyn mentioned that she had some corrections on the Art in Public
Places Guidelines. She agreed to write a letter summarizing her
corrections and send them to Kristan.
The Vail Valley Arts Council will present a conceptual proposal to the
Arts Board at the next meeting on December 4th. Their project involves
designing a mural for the office space located at the Lionshead Parking
Structure.
The meeting was adjourned. The next Art in Public Places Board meeting
is scheduled for December 4, 1989 at 8:30 a.m.
-~ o
~OWn 0
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
November 22, 1989
office of community development
Mr. Jim Hoy
P.O. Box 398
Tabernash, Colorado 80478
Re: See or Ski Sculpture proposal for the Town of Vail
Dear Jim,
On behalf of the Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board, I would like
to thank you for your efforts to present your Skier Sculpture proposal,
See or Ski Colorado. Your presentation was extremely professional and
very thorough. Even though the project was not approved, we appreciate
your interest in our community. Thank you again for taking the time
and effort to make a comprehensive presentation to the Board.
If you have any additional questions about the review, please feel free
to contact me at 479-2138.
Sincerely,
~~ ~~ ~1~ -
Kristan Pritz
Senior Planner
KP:lr
cc: Art in Public Places Board
down
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
November 22, 1989
Mr. Kent Meyers
Director of Marketing
Vail Associates
P.O. Box 7
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: See or Ski Colorado Sculpture proposal
Dear Kent,
office of community developmen4
The Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board reviewed Mr. Jim Hoy's
Skier Sculpture proposal on November 20, 1989. The Board voted to deny
the request. The Board appreciated Mr. Hoy's very professional and
thorough presentation. It was also evident that he has a very sincere
interest in our community. Although the proposal was not approved, we
appreciate you asking Mr. Hoy to work with the Town of Vail on this
project. He was very cooperative and diplomatic throughout the review
process.
I also want to thank Betsy Farny on your staff who helped me a great
deal by passing on information to Mr. Hoy. She was very patient with
Mr. Hoy as well as with me in coordinating this project.
If I can answer any specific questions for you about the review
process, please give me a call at 479-2138. Once again, I appreciate
your willingness to work with the Town of Vail.
Sincerely, -
j 11 ~1~~~~ • ~
Kristan Pritz
Senior Planner
KP:lr
cc: Art in Public Places Board
The Sail Trail -November 24, 1989
~°~ ~~~d rejects one skier
~~~fl~~e9 v~.-.~._ s~~ anot~ier
~y s~~ >~>~~~AA>~
Vail's Art in Public Places
Board on Monday rejected a
sculpture proposed for north-
west of the Covered Bridge,
and then agreed to consider
another piece.
The sculpture of a skier was
rejected with only Jamie
McCluskey voting to accept the
piece.
Board members expressed a
general dislike of the piece and
of skier sculptures in general,
and said the site in question is
too prominent a location for
anything less than the best.
"I don't think a modern piece
fits the alpine village," said
Tom Steinberg. "This piece
reminds me of going to a
knickknack shop and looking
at sculptures made from
railroad spikes. Is that what we
want in a prime spot?"
Randy Milhoan said he had
heard several negative reac-
tions to the piece based on a
photo in The Vail Trail. "I don't
like the piece;' he said.
"I'm not enamored of skiers,"
he said. "I don't know that we
have to illustrate with skiers
that we are a ski resort. I don't
think we need a lot of figura
tive or sentimental art. It's not
beneficial to the community;
it's not something to be proud
of."
Jim Cotter agreed, and said
Vail does not need statues.
Sally Sheridan also agreed,
and said the skier sculpture.
would restrict the site. "A skier
is too limiting for that area,"
she said. ,
There was also discussion to
the effect that Vail has a limited
number of prime sites and
ought to commission specific
pieces to fit the sites rather
than taking existing pieces and
trying to make them fit.
Rosalyn Swig especially
-y.
.~
'~ i
~`l ~k
t t.
~
V~S
'. ,x4'
~~'-
t
t, x. ~~
~~ ~ ~
~:~
~rr. .;
~:
~
...:
'~~
* ~
.
z {
`
~~ ~
~ ~
Y ~ '~
.
~~ y
r
~ ~~~~
~
.~ "~
t.
,;~ ~,
~ ~
~
~
~
~
,;
•
-yba~
i~...
A
7 _
}
t~~
~
~
~
~
s
~..
~
r \ ~.
~
~:
' N
4
- ~ '
~ }
~
..f ~
Y
~. T ,,. ~
;~?
-°Liberation° by Lee Stark has been offered to the Town of Vail and will
be considered by Art Board. Photo by Tara Flanagan.
questioned the idea of
considering existing pieces.
She said Vail only has a few
sites for public art but that they
are "very wonderful sites.
"We are a. world-class com-
munity and we can think in
world-class terms," she said.
Swig said Vail should decide
which sculptors it would like to
work with and then try to get
them.
"Would a Calder be appro-
priate? Would it bespeak Vail?
If you had the chance to get an
See next page
y ..
The Vail Trail -November 24, 1989
+~"~ ` ~ •
From previous page
r%litenburg, well, we had the
chance, would that bespeak
Vail? If•we had our choice, who
•,wuld we like to attract to
Vail?" she asked.
Milhoan said the process of
choosing art is complicated by
the fact that the art board has
not yet inventoried the appro-
priate sites for public art i n
Vail. Conducting such an in-
~: antory is one of the board's
:coals for the next year.
Seeming to object somewhat
to the criterion of choosing
only a known artist, sculptor
J.M. Hoy said, "I firmly believe
you will soon begin hearing the
name Hoy. I'm before my time
in coming before you as an
established artist."
In voting to accept Hoy's
piece, McCluskey said h e
thought the art board could
help the piece to fit on the site.
"I think it could work there;' he
said.
Hoy's piece "See or Ski
Colorado" was considered by
the art board after Hoy ap-
proached Vail Associates with
the idea of placing the sculp-
ture in Vail. His idea was that a
corporate sponsor would do-
nate the sculpture and use it as
part of its advertising and pub-
lic relations. VA referred him
and his sculpture to the town
for consideration.
Now, Milhoan said, VA is still
free to make a deal with Hoy
and place the sculpture on its
own land if it wants to.
Hoy also said he m a y
approach Avon with a similar
offer to the one he made Vail.
After rejecting the Hoy
sculpture, the town was
promptly offered another piece
for consideration.
Lee Stark, apart-time Vail
resident, has offered the town
an eight-foot bronze of his
sculpture "Liberation" at no
cost to the town if a n
"agreeable location" can be
found. Stark would prefer the
sculpture be placed on one of
the lower rocks in the fountain
north of the Covered Bridge.
Casting of the sculpture is
being done at Battle Mountain
Bronze in Minturn.
Stark, like Hoy, would like to
find a ,sponsor, but would
donate the piece to the town
whether a sponsor is found or
not.
His sculpture is also of a
skier. .
Stark was not at the Monday
meeting, but was represented
by Mary Zimmerman of Battle
Mountain •Bronze. She said
"Liberation" is not aone-of-a-
kind piece, but that three of
them are being cast as well as a
number of smaller copies of the
work.
Consideration of this piece
will be scheduled for a future
meeting of the art board, but no
date has yet been set for that.
The board meets on the first
and third Mondays of each
month.
Another current project of
the art board is to work with
the town and the architects to
see if public art can be included
in the upcoming addition to the
Vail Village parking structure.
It was suggested that public
art in the structure could
include such things as murals,
trash cans, fountains, stair-
ways, and stairway rails.
The board also agreed to try
and meet with the contractors
of the new Vail post office to
see if some public art can be
included there.
The desire to see public art
placed as part of large new
developments led to a discus-
sion of trying to convince the
town to enact an ordinance
requiring public art as part of
some new developments.
~~
The Town of Vail goes to Mexico for Christmas!
F
4
J
l
One very special aspect of the Town of Vail is the
many countries and cultures which are represented by
employees and citizens. Individuals from around the
globe come together to make us Number One!
In recognition of our eclectic population, we would
like to pay tribute to the traditions of these
nationalities beginning with our neighboring
country of Mexico. __
Come Join Us for TOV's
FELIZ NAVIDAD CELEBRATION!
Place: The Westin Hotel - Cascade Ballroom
Date: Friday - December 15, 1989
Time: Cocktails - 6:30 to 7:00 PM
Dinner - 7:00 PM
Entertainment: Presentation of TOV Employee of the Year Award
Dancing to the rhythms of Anything Goes!
Door prizes and gifts
~.
me join us for a Christmas party in the Mexican tradition:
Mexican buffet, a Mexican serenade, pinatas and more! ~,
>~'«~
(Two drink coupons will bo provided per person. Each person will
be responsible for purchaso of additional beverages.)
Na~~ of uai
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2105
office o4 touvn manager
December 5, 1989
Mr. Ed Grange
General Manager
Holy Cross Electric Association
P. 0. Box 250
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Dear Ed:
Dave Sage has talked with John Slevin and gave him your Board's counter
proposal for selling the Noly Cross parcel in Vail to the Town of Vail.
It is my understanding that the counter offer includes a proposed sales
price of $595,000, and terms of ten percent down payment with fourteen
years to pay the balance at nine percent interest. If this information
is in any way different from ,your understanding of the counter proposal,
please let me know as soon as possible.
The Town Council election produced four new Councilmembers out of the
seven total. The Council is in the process over the next few weeks of
examining its priorities and getting up to speed. I would guess the
Council will be able to address your counter proposal and give a formal
response by sometime in January.
Thank you for your Board's consideration of our offer and for presenting
this counter proposal.
Sinc e ,
Rondall U. Phillips
Town Manager
RVP/bsc
cc: Vail Town Council
David Sage
• ,,
~o~o of uai
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2105
office of 4ov~rn manager
December 5, 1989
The Honorable Walter Fox
Mayor
P. 0. gox 109
Red Cliff, Colorado 81649
Dear Walter:
Thank you for your letter of December 4 concerning what the Town of Red
Cliff has done in seeking planning assistance from the Northwest
Colorado COG and others. I suggest that your staff representative, or
Council representative, sit down with someone from the Vail Community
Development Department and staff members from other entities from whom
you have requested funds in a joint meeting to discuss the scope of work
you are looking at, and how that best might be achieved. I feel it is
important that some staff review of this proposal occur before taking
the funding request to any of the governing bodies.
A member of our Community Development Department will be happy to meet
with the group at a mutually acceptable time and place. Cal Thomas or
Jim Lamont may feel free to contact Peter Patten directly to arrange a
meeting.
Sincer ,
Rondall U. Phillips
Town Manager
RUP/bsc
cc: Vail Town Council
Peter Patten
Charles Wick
~~ ®~ E ~~~~~ REC'DOEC -51989
RIe® CLIFF, ~®L®RA®® ~~649
Town Council
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, ColoraGO 81657
December 4, 1989
Dear Mayor and Members of the Town Council:
We wish to bring to your attention, additional
information with regards to our budgetary request for joint
planning funds.
T_n o~~r October 9, 1989 letter we requested budgetary.
consideration, by the Vail Town Council, concerning the need
to mutually finance planning studies in the territory between
our two communities. We pointed out that Colorado State
Statues now permits communities to join in inter-governmental
agreements for the purpose of master planning territory of '
common concern.
A new state law past in the 1989 session of the state
legislature provides for intergovernmental agreements which
permits local governments to provide for mutually enforceable
comprehensive development plans.
The law, House Bill 1342, allows local governments
pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement, to provide for
revenue-sharing as a means to provide funding for jointly
prepared comprehensive development plans.
An intergovernmental agreement can contain a provision
that a comprehensive development plan shall continue to
control a particular land area even though the land area is
annexed or jurisdiction transferred to another local
government.
We received a response from your Town Manager on October
26, 1989 suggesting that we seek financial assistance from
the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments.
On November 15, 1989 we submitted to the NWCCOG, in
respect to your Town Manager's suggestion, an impact
assistance application for a grant to allow us to conduct
within the Town of Red Cliff master planning studies and
prepare land use regulations.
The planning project will focus on the following areas,
which have been identified by the Town Council as needing
immediate attention. The preparation of Land Use Regulations
which incorporate development restriction in areas of known
flood plain and geologic hazards, establishes land use and
development standards, provide for the protection and --
preservation of historic site and structure „ and identify
Town of Vail
Joint Planning: Funding Proposal
December 4, 1989
Page 2
areas for annexation and new development. Secondly, to take
into consideration the affects of the needs and plans of
surrounding governmental jurisdictions.
The Town Council has budgeted $5000 for the purpose
of funding its 1989 planning program. In addition, to
conducting our own planning effort, we wish our
representatives to participate, with other local agencies and
governments, concerning issues which will affect the future
of our community. We are requesting funds which will be used
for the purpose of providing our own professional
representation during the conduct of applicable planning
studies and discussions.
We wish to consult with the Town of Vail municipal
government as to how the Town of Red Cliff can contribute to
the solution of mutual problems such as residential housing,
transportation, and recreation. The Town of Red Cliff shares
many of the same planning concerns with the` Town of Vail,
particularly as it relates to the future development of Vail
Mountain and the availability of a labor force for local
businesses.
Once our water and sanitation problems are corrected,
the community may be able'to provide additional capacity for
residential housing units which can be used to provide
housing for the local population. ..However, without prior
planning we cannot adequately determine the quantity of
housing which we can provide.
If funds are not available from. other local or State of
Colorado sources, the Town of Red Cliff municipal government
will be placed in the position of imposing a building
moratorium. The moratorium will be required until the
municipal government can set aside sufficient funds to
prepare and adopt the planning and land use regulations
required by .State of Colorado statutes.
Representatives of the USFS have agreed to participate
in a mutual planning effort. Issues of mutual concerns
include Eagle County Land Use Plan, Vail Mountain
Development, Shrine Pass Development, Eagle Mine and Battle
Mountain Land Use Development, Holy Cross Wilderness, Camp
Hale Development Area, Climax Mine Restoration Area, and the
multiple-use development areas of the USFS.
Town of Vail
Joint Planning: Funding Proposal
December 4,.1989
Page 3
We would appreciate your consideration of our request
for $5000 for the Town of Red Cliff, to jointly fund
planning protect concerning residential housing,
transportation, recreation facilities and other pertinent
subjects.
Prior to your making a final determination on this
proposal, I would like to request the opportunity to address
the Vail To:ti°:~ Council with regards to this matter. We have
or will make similar requests of other local governments and
private entities.
Sincerely, ~
~~/
Mayor Walter Fox
RECD DEC - 5 1989
December 5, 1989
Mr. Peter Patten
Director of Community Development
Town of Vail
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Mr. Patten:
SUBJECTo PLANNING COMMISSION
Please accept this letter as my request to serve on the Planning
Commission for the Town of Vail.
The following will illustrate my interest in community development
and my qualifications for this position.
EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONe
I have been involved in development and construction of
resort communities for over 30 years, including Perisher
Valley, Australia; Telluride, Aspen and Vail, Colorado.
I can read and understand plans and development concepts
readily.
CONCERN FOR QUALITY GROWTHo
As a full time resident in Vail since 1966, I have developed
sensitivity to the needs and desires of the local constituency
as well as the reality of growth within our community.
BROAD BUSINESS PERSPECT%~lEo
As former Director of the largest department at Vail Associates
(Ski School), as well as through other business endeavors, I
have developed in-depth knowledge that includes aspects of
finance, administration and personnel.
HIGH ENERGY AND CREDIBIL%TYo
Due to objectivity and professionalism, I have become repected
as a loyal and caring member of our community. I have
developed sound work and business habits and have the energy
to contribute to a number of tasks.
I have a strong personal desire to make a positive difference
within our community. Due to my background, I believe that my
energies and interest would allow me to make a valuable
contribution if I were a member of the planning commission.
If appointed, I would endeavor to be a diligent and hardworking
member in helping to shape Vail's future.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ludwig Kurz
2725 Bald Mountain Rd.
Vail, CO 81657
Updated: 12/04/89
TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS
Name
Mailing Address
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
P. 0. Box 2101
Vail, CO 81658
Thomas I. Steinberg, Mayor Pro Tem
P. 0. Box 13
Vail, CO 81658
Lynn A. Fritzlen
P. 0. Box 57
Vail, CO 81658
Jim J. Gibson
5137 North Main Gore Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Merv Lapin
232 West Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Robert M. Levine
680 West Lionshead Place
Vail, CO 81657
Spouse/Bus/Res Term Term
Home Address Begin Ex ire
Rayma/476-6340/3375 11/83 11/91
1881 Lionsridge Loop #3
Florence/476-5695/5427 11/87 11/91
1022 Eagles Nest Circle
William Pierce/476-6342/7060 11/89 11/91
2998 South Frontage Road West
Nancy/476-0742/0742
Same
476-5483/5483
Same
Sandrine/476-2471/2471
Same
Margaret (Peggy) A. Osterfoss
c/o Columbine Creations
143 East Meadow Drive
Vail, CO 81657
Rondall V. Phillips, Town Manager
P. 0. Box 1322
Vail, CO 81658
DEPARTMENT HEADS
11/89 11/93
11/87 11/91
;11/89 11/93
476-1730/0503 11/89 11/93
4010 North Frontage Road East
Karen/479-2100/6656
2507 Arosa Drive
Stan Berryman, Public Works/Transportation Director
Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
Dick Duran, Fire Chief
Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney
Annie Fox, Library Director
Ken Hughey, Chief of Police
Peter Patten, Community Development Director
Charlie Wick, Assistant Town Manager/Administrative Services Director -
(H) 949-1318, (W) 479-2113
R"
_- ~o.
P ~
DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST
BRIAN ANDERSON
STEVE WARWICK
PETE BURNETT
DICK DURAN
CAROLINE FISHER
ANNIE FOX
JOHN GALLEGOS
PETER PATTEN
FILE
ERNST GLATZLE
SKIP GORDON
GREG HALL
SUSIE HERVERT
JIM HOZA
KEN HUGHEY
JOE KOCHERA
HANK LOVATO
CINDY VAN HOOSE-
SORENSEN
TOWN COUNCIL
GARY MURRAIN
JOE NORRIS
MIKE ROSE
TODD SCHOLL
LEO VASQUEZ
CHARLIE WICK
PAT DODSON
PATTY BIERLE
MEMORANDUM
TOo RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER
FROMe STAN BERRYMAN, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION
DATEo NOVEMBER 29 , 1989
REo PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF
NOVEMBER 27 - DECEMBER 1, 1989
STREETS AND ROADS
A. 1. Continue installation of X-Mas lights, garland and
wreaths.
2. Replace totem pole at Ice Arena.
3. Deliver Christmas trees.
4. Chisel concrete at steps of Vail 21 Building so the
will match.
5. Relocate parking info sign near EV exit.
6. Continue winter operations, weather permitting.
7. Correct and install additional pedestrian signs in
Village and Lionshead.
8. Move jersey barriers to loading area at VTRC.
9. Install caution signs on Golf Course curve.
B. 1. Install grease reel at PW Bay.
PARKING STRUCTURE
A. 1. Replace door at Main Vail Fire Station.
2. Install vestibule at LTRC Auxiliary Building
3. Install loading zone area - lst floor - W. end - LHTRC.
4. Install ski racks at LH Auxiliary Building.
5. Order & install sign at Library - "Please Stay Off
Roof'° .
6. Keep record of cars at Ford Park.
B. 1. Beginning 12/10, the LHTRC will be open 24 hours.
2. Fix water fountain in Library atrium.
PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST
PAGE 2
CARPENTERS
A.
B.
1. Replace various railings at LHTRC.
2. Construct and install bus stop posts.
3. Build directory signage covers for VTRC.
4. Replace totem pole at Concert Hall Plaza.
5. Construct WV bus shelter.
6. Building tree stands for X-mas.
7. Construct various wood street signs.
1. Install partitions at PD Detective area.
2. Repair signs (4-way stop, Lionshead).
3. Investigate kitchen appliance remodel at Library.
ELECTRICIANS
A. 1. Begin installation of power for X-mas lights.
2. Adjust clocktower.
3. Hook up new hotsy in bus wash.
4. Replace baseboard heaters in LH & Village Booths.
5. Change out directional light at Main Vail ticket
booths.
6. Repair outages as per inventoryo
a. Concert Hall Plaza b. Manor Vail
co Behind Ice Arena d. Tunnel Light
B. 1. Install light in coatroom in PW Admin. Bldg.
2. Perform various electrical work at Ice Arenao
a .Install new wire moulding and switch in managers
office.
b. Move low voltage light switches from office to
zamboni room.
c. Move welding plug to new location and add plug-in
strip.
d. Research information on plug-in strip (sockets)
for special event powere
e. Add fluorescent light fixture in boiler area.
f. Replace 2 ballasts in locker rooms.
g. Change EM light ballasts.
h. Add outlets in Dennis°s new office.
3. Repair outlet near little copier at Municipal Building
- see Tracy.
4. Install electrical outlet for printer at Rec
Department.
5. Perform maintenance jobs at Librarye
a. Unhook stove in Community Room
b. Change several ballasts
6. Electrical parts ordered for TRC bathrooms.
7. Fix fan in Library staff restroom.
SB/slh