Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-01-16 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessiont VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1.:990 12:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Discussion of Affordable Housing Project with Planning and Environmental Commission and Rosall, Remmen and Cares, Inc. 2. Review of Planning and Environmental Commission Conditions of Approval for the Vail Village Parking Structure Expansion 3. Symphony of Sports Update 4. Discussion of Survey Crew Budget Item 5. Information Update 6. Other 7. Executive Session - Personnel Matter 8. Site Visit - Faessler Site for Employee Units Location: Between Buildings C and D of the Meadow Greek Condominiums on Kinnickinnick Road in Intermountain VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990 12:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 12:00 1. Discussion of affordable housing project with PEC and Peter Patten Rosall, Remmen and Cares Nolan Rosall Chris Cares Action Requested of Council: Discuss issues as per enclosed agenda. Make decisions as necessary during the meeting. Background Rationale: The Council has requested this project to address, define, and take action on the affordable housing problem. 2:00 2. Review of PEC conditions of approval for the Vail Village Peter Patten Parking Structure expansion Stan Berryman Action Requested of Council: Discuss the priority of add alternates for the parking structure and determine if it is necessary to appeal the PEC's approval because of the conditions of approval. Background Rationale: The PEC approved the Vail Village parking structure with the condition that the entire project be constructed, including the fifth level overpass, renovation of the existing transit facility, community improvements (bikepaths, sidewalks), and widening of East Meadow Drive. The PEC felt that these four add alternates were necessary and that they must be part of the project. The PEC requested to be involved in any prioritization of the add alternates if deemed necessary by the Town Council. 2:30 3. Symphony of Sports Update Pat Dodson Background Rationale: VMRD is reappearing before the Council to update on the progress of the Symphony of Sports. 2:50 4. Discussion of Survey Crew Budget Item Steve Barwick Stan Berryman Action Requested of Council: Receive presentation and Greg Hall approve/deny/modify staff plans. Background Rationale: The addition of an in-house survey and design crew was approved by Council during the 1990 budget process. Several Councilmembers have requested that staff prepare .and present a more in-depth justification before these positions are filled. Staff Recommendation: ,4pprove staff plans to recruit for an in-house survey and design crew. 3:15 5. Information Update Ron Phillips 3:20 6. Other 3:30 7. Executive Session - Personnel Matter Larry Eskwith 4:00 8. Site Visit - Faessler site for employee units Mike Mollica Location: Between Buildings C and D of the Meadow Creek Condominiums on Kinnickinnick Road in Intermountain RCaSALL REMMEN CARES i~ir~rvt`~iru:.;. _~r;~.nr~ ~~i.:.;;r;rv nrai~ ~~rsiai+CH AGENDA VAiL E1KPLaYEE HnUSINC WORKSHOP January id, 1990 Hi,:..~ti kr'Mhtl'NnN[.'C:,~IIL`%.iNr.~ I. piscussion oP principal Qlternsatives which could be utilized in expanding affordable housing opportunities a) Amendments to land use regulations 1. Requirements related to ma,~or developments generating new employees 2. PerFocmance standards incorporated rota SU1? section 3. "Caretak~c" units 4. other Gode reviAinns and/or incentives b} Utilization of publicly owned land within and outside current Tawn boundariaa as a catalyst to create such housing 1. Town of Vail owned parcels 2. county or Avon owned parcels 3. U.S. Rorest Lands c} Improve utilization and availability of current supply of ercond homes by Iang-term or seasonal employees d} Regional solutions 1. Coordinated Town and t;aur-ty ePFocta 2. Creat.fan cif a "Regional" Housing Authority and referral agency 3. Coordinated public transit e) Expand Funding sources ]. Public/private partnerships 2. ftousi.ng Trust Fund 3. Impact f9es 4. Other f) Other to be identified Post-it'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 ~ or pages - .k),, ,~ F-om v ~ ,~. , t~ ~ I Co. Ca. ``~~~~ Tip, ,a1 ~r ,1[!r/ !{.rr('., ___. R~SALL REMMEN CARES fq nrJNifJ(~+ UN~IP~h ;:: ~di~:;Pd ,1N(~, ~~t Sl.,v~f:~ I AGENDA {cant.} VAIL EMPl:OYEE HOUSING WQRK3HOP January 18, 1990 II. Philosaphtnal discussion of the appropriate balance between directly improving employees' ability to purchase or rent housing through wage increases or allowances versus encouraging expansion in the supply of availr~blc "designated" employee units III. Prioritiretion of alternatives to Yocus attention and developmr~nt of a follow-up program. Consider creation of mini-task force{s) from participants to assist consultant and staff, and developing specific recommendations. IV. Other issues a} Staff resources b} pacumentation of need SCT~vIMIT COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY AGREEhfENT (Preliminary Draft -Subject to Discussion and Review) Prepared For: ' 'The Northwest Council of Governments Housing Steering Committee Prepared By: Ros<~ll Remmen Cares, Inc. 1426 Pearl Street, Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80302 303/49-6558 January 3, 1990 Letter of Agreement for Professional Services Related to Local Employees Survey and Associated Consulting Services Concerning Affordable Housing e..,- ~-- - -, This agreement is made as of January Council of Governments (NWCOG) as (RRC) as "Consultant.'' \.__ 1990, bet~ti~een the Northwest "Contractor" and Rosall Renunen and Cares, Inc. 1. Survey Design and Testing Consultant will assume primary responsibility for the design and review of the survey instrument to be used in Summit County. In preparing the survey, we will work closely with the Steering Committee to establish appropriate wording that would address local issues as they are presently defined, and ensure comparability to the maximum extent possible with past studies and research. This joint effort will determine the appropriate length of the questionnaire, the priorities for topics to be addressed, and the optimal method for obtaining the best possible sample of employees of businesses located in Summit County. It is assumed that RRC will undertake final formatting of the survey instnunent and print the forms. Consultant will distribute the forms in an agreed-upon manner, generally consisting of personal visits to a sample of approximately 10 to 15 of the largest area employers, and a mailing to a sample of the remaining employers. The design of the sample will be such that 400 to 500 completed questionnaires are anticipated, allowing an accurate profiling of demographics and attitudes of residents in Summit County and some stratification of geographic subareas. f _ .,__ .~ The 1VW000/C unty will be responsible for providing and coordinating an "incentive" designed to improve response rates and interest in the study. 2. Data Entry and Compilation Consultant will be responsible for entering the raw survey. forms into the computer and will generate a series of tables describing the results of the study. Further, the Consultant will prepare lists of a selection of the "open-ended" comments sufficient to allow local leaders to review results and have sufficient feel for the types of comments and suggestions that. are being made. If a complete tabulation of the open-ended comments is desired, Consultant will work with local staff to assist in preparing such lists, but the actual clerical work will be done by local staff. 3. ~~lcxisting Conditions Summary In' conjunction with the County Planning Staff, ItRC will prepare an analysis of existing units designed to determine existing numbers of units by type, occupancy status with a rough determination of whether the units are in the managed "pool" or used primarily by, ~~_ owners. We have -established the cost of this analysis to be up to $1,200. We do not propose to do a complete windshield inventory of units; rather, by working through staff, homeowners associations, etc., we will attempt to develop the best possible data base for the allocated budget. '~~,. cr' a_a 4. Summary Report with Appropriate Graphics At the conclusion of the data collection phase of the study, the Consultant will assume primary responsibility for preparing choosing-oriented report that summarizes the findings from the study. The two primary purposes of the report will be to: 1) Document tl~e survey methodology, any lunitations to the data collected, and the means by which interested individtaals can access the full data base that was generated; and 2) '""~ S~`~'1 Interpret and summarize the key findings from the study in a "short format" report (8 to ~~. ~ z ~~-~ 12 pages) that describes results and implications as a source of direction for generating '"~ t~ ,ter, local policy. Wherever possible, the report will utilize charts and graphs to illustrate data collected by the survey. 5. Work Session on Research Results Upon completion of the survey analysis, the Consultant would hold a "cvorking meetuig" with the Task Force to address prelinnary results. This meeting would examine the implications of preliminary findings and would set the agenda and work program for the final step of the consulting effort, the Planning Analysis and Recommendations. 6. Planning Analysis and Recommendations c~ -~-~' "-~ - ~" ~ `~~' `""''' ~'~ Following the work session, the Consultant team will apply the research findings to a list of topics to include, at a minimum,. the following objectives and issues as identified in advance by the Housing Steering Committee: a) Units needed for permanent, rental and temporary housing. b) Type of units needed: single-family, townhouse, dormitory, other (what would be purchased, rented, etc.?) c) Who are the potential users? Where do they want to live and work? What is their income? d) What has happened to existing "affordable" housing? Have there been changes in local attitudes or priorities toward housing? e) Is "enforcement" of regulations an issue? f) In addition, the idea of developing a local "model" to project housing needs has been identified as a possibility. RRC has experience in developing such models and is confident that the data that will be generated through the survey will apply to the model; however, the creation of a model is not included in this Agreement/Scope of Services.. g) How should the review and integration of local planning standards and regulations be approached? This analysis will result. in a working document suitable for public presentation at a public meeting. It will be a sununary report designed to set direction, identify priorities, and generally outline amulti-dimensional strategy to monitor and address affordable housing needs and solutions. 2 This final work product will be deterntined, in part, by issues t11at arise in the course of the study and by the desires of the Steering Committee. RP.C is proposing to work on an hourly basis to complete this work with the total fee for this task to be $1,500. If work beyond the $],500 fee is desired by the Steering Committee, it will be negotiated separately. The final report will contain an overview discussion of various alternatives for programs that may exist, such as: • Bond funds • Purchase of existing units • Purchase of new units (build) • Public/private partnerships • "Incentives" such as land use/density considerations, subsidies such as guaranteed rent and damage deposit, free or low-cost land, etc. • I~Tew institutions or modifications to existing institutions • Income from real estate escrows as a source of funds • Alternatives to purchasing 1<3nd It is intended that the Steering Committee will identify three to four strategies that will be addressed by the consultants in this phase of work. The Consultant shall provide 20 copies of the Research Results summary, 20 copies of the Draft Report, t~vo copies of the full data that is generated during the study (crosstabulation tables), and one camera-ready copy of the final report. 7. Period of Service The period of service under this Agreement shall commence January ]0, 1990, and shall expire on March 31, 1990. The provisions of this Agreement and the compensation for the Consultant's services have been agreed to in anticipation of an orderly and continuous progress of the project. Should the project be delayed or suspended in part beyond 60 days by the Contractor or any governmental authority or any cause beyond the control of the Consultant, this contract shall be terminated. 8. Agreement Amendment The estimated cost of this Agreement shall not be increased or deemed to be increased, except by specific written notification to the Contractor by "Change Order" indicating the new amount to be allotted to the Agreement. Amendments to this Agreement as to allowable charges or statements of work shall be by "Change Order;' the form and content of which shall be prescribed by the Contractor. Changes to the Agreement shall be executed in writing by duly authorized representatives of the Contractor and the Consultant. 9. Time Schedule for Completion of Research and Related Documents. The Consultant's services shall be provided in strict accordance with the following schedule: 3 Meeting Date 1/2/90 1/10/90 Mid-February Early March: Same Day Early March: Primary Responsibility Purpose RRC Survey Review RRC Survey and Contract Finalization RRC Review Summary Results RRC Review Final Draft Report with Steering Committee RRC Review draft in Public Meeting with County Commissioners ,'~.~ In addition, one or more meetings of tI~NWCOG~teering Comnttee will be held independent of P.RC to review alternative strategies to determine emphasis of Consultant's analysis efforts, as described in Section 6. 10. Specific Charges The total cost of the proposed services shall .not exceed $10,000, including reimbursable expenses. Further, the cost of the Existing Conditions Summary component shall not exceed $1,200, billed hourly (approximately 24 hours at $50/hour). The cost of the Strategic Planning Analysis shall not exceed $1,500 billed hourly (approximately 30 hours of work at $50/hour). The Northwest Council of Governments will pay the Consultant on the basis of its time and direct expenses incurred in order to provide the services required by this Agreement. a) The charge for time shall consist of the hourly billing rates specified below. It is understood by the parties that the billing rates cover profit and overhead, including, but not limited to, taxes, employee benefits, secretarial and adnunistrative support staff and supplies, office rent and utilities, and insurance. The Consultant's primary employees who' will work on the project and their hourly salaries are as follows: Hourly Billing Name Title Rate Nolan Rosall Principal $100.00 C. Christian Cares Project Manager $80.00 Matthew Gilbert and Senior Analysts $45.00 Mike Simone Clerical Services $20.00-$28.00 4 b) ~ Direct expenses incurred~by_the Consultant in connection with the project shall be clkarged to the NWCOG, on the basis of the expenses actually incurred by the Consultant, wtthout any additional surc}k~rge added by it. Such direct ' expenses shall include such items as costs related to printing and reproduction costs, and long distance telephone clkarges. D~- c) Upon reasonable advance request, the C-i~ gray inspect and copy any or all ~ rectyor~ds of the Consultant which woulc~Uear on any amounts charged to the NuxS ~~~ursuant to this Agreement. d) Consultant may bill its charges to Contractor for its services and expenses hereunder not more than once a month. Each bill shall cover only the services performed and expenses incurred since the last bill, or in the instance of tl~e initial bill, since the date services began. Contractor will pay each bill tti~ithin 45 days of its receipt. If Contractor fails to pay Consultant in frill, within 30 days of the receipt of the bill, the amount due shall include a late charge at the rate of 1-1/2 percent per month from the 45th day. Upon reasonable advance request, Contractor may inspect and copy any or all records of Consultant which would bear upon and amounts charged to Contractor in any particular bill or bills. Each monthly bill shall include a statement which summarizes the time worked and general tasks undertaken by individual members of the Consultant team, including in-house personnel. The Contractor shall hold a retainer, not to exceed 10% of the total contract amount ($1,000) until delivery of the final camera-ready document that concludes the work program. 11. Termination of Agreement y a) This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ,15 days'. written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in ~~accordance with the terms herein set forth. b) Tn the event of termination of Agreement by Contractor, the Consultant shall be paid compensation for its services performed to termination date. c) In the event of termination, Consultant shall deliver to Contractor the originals of all documents which it prepared .pursuant to this Agreement up to the termination date. 12. Ownership of Documents Drawings, reports and the final document delivered to Contractor shall be Contractor's property. All documents and copies thereof, prepared by Consultant in connection. with this Agreement, which it is required to deliver to Contractor, shall be and remain Contractor's property. Both parties are authorized to retain for their records and use said final documents in any manner and for any purpose they deem appropriate. 5 13. Insurance ' a) Minimum Amounts The Consultant shall carry the following minimum amounts of insurance: 1) VVorlcmen's Compensation in statutory linuts. 2) Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Policy for amounts not less than: Bodily Injury X150,000 each person, including death X400,000 each occurrence Probe Damage $100,000 each occurrence b) Coverage Said insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement and shall protect the Consultants, their employees, subcontractors, agents and representatives, and the NWCOG from claims for damages for personal injury and wrongful death and for damages to property arising in any manner from negligent or ~vrongful acts of the Consultant, their employees, agents or representatives, in the performance of the services covered herein. 14. Subcontracting Consultant shall not engage any other subcontractors to perform services required by this Agreement without the advance ~ti~ritten approval of Contractor. 15. Successors and Assigns Contractor and the Consultant each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party ~~~ith respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither Contractor nor the Consultant shall assign or transfer their interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Governing Law Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the day and year first written above. NWCOG Authorized Representative ATTEST: Secretary ROSALL RE?~iMEN AND CARES, INC. President 7 • SUMFIIT COUNTY IiOUSING AU'fIIORITI' URAF1' Stl EMPLOYEE HOUSING SURVEY 12-29'89 PLEASE RETURN THE SURVEY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVE LOPE ' BY MAIL OR BY DROPPING IT IN THE BOX AT THE SUMMIT COUNTY COURTHOUSE DY 1F•. ~ ' ~ ~~ . F ~ -`-' J ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ PRESENT HOUSING Rosail, Remmen, and Cares, Inc. la. ~+Ih ere do you live? (CIiECK IN BOX BELOW) 01) [ ] Blue River 02) [ ] Breckenridge 03) [ ] Upper Blue, Unincorporated 04) [ 1 Copper Mountain 05) '~ [ ] .Dillon 06) [ ]Dillon, Unincorporated 07) [ ] Frisco 08) [ ] Frisco, Unincorporated 09) [ ] Heeney, Lower Blue 10) [ ] Keystone, Snake River area, Summit Cove 11) [ ] Silverthorne 12) [ ] Silverthorne, Unincorporated 13) ~' [ 1 Other: 2. What type of residence do you live in? 1) [ ] Single family house 2) [ ] Duplex, triplex, fourplex 3) [ J Apartment/condominium 4) [ ] Mobile home 5) [ ] Cabin 6) [ ] Room 7) [ ] Apartment in house 8) [ ] Other: 3. Number of bedrooms in your residence? 1) [ ] Studio 2) [ ] One bedroom 3) ( ] Two bedrooms 4) [ ] Three bedrooms 5) ( 1 Four bedrooms 6) [ ] Five bedrooms or more 4. Including yourself, how many adults 18 or over live in your residence? Adults 5. How many children live in your residence? (ENTER 0 IF NONE) Children 6. (IF Cf1ILDREN) Ilow many children do you have in the following age groups living in your residence'? a. 3 and under b. 4 - 8 years old c. 9 - 14 years oid d. I5 - I7 years old -1- ' 7. Is your residence in this area: 1) f ) Seasonal (6 months per year or less) 2) ( ] Permanent (greater than 6 months) 8. (IF SEASONAL) Now many years have you been coming to the Summit County region? 1) [ ] Less than one year 2) [ ] Two years 3) [ ] Three years 4) [ ] Four years 5) [ 1 Five years 6) ( ] More than five 9. (IF SEASONAL) During which seasons are you in Summit County? (CHECK ALL T}fAT APPLY) 1) ( ] Spring 2) ~[ ] Summer 3) [ ] Fall 4) [ ] Winter 10. (IF PERMANENT) How many years have you resided in the Summit County region? 1) ( ] Less than 3 months ' 2) ( ] Three to six months 3) [ ) Six months to 1 year 4) ( ] One up to 3 years 5) [ ] Three up to 5 years 6) [ ] Five up to 10 years 7) ( ] More than 10 years 11 . ( IF CON'T'INUOUSLY IN TIfE AREA) In how many separate residences have you lived in the last: a. One year? b. Three years? 12. On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is "No Problem" and 5 is "Very Difficult," please rate your experience finding housing in the Summit • County region: No Problem a. Housing in an acceptable condition 1 b. Housing in an acceptable location 1 c. Affordable . housing 1 Very Difficult 2 3 9 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 -2- i3. Oo you presently: 1) [ j Own 2) [ ) Rent 3) [ J Rent a room 4) ( 1 House sit/caretake 5) [ J Other: 14. (IF RENT) What are the terms of your rental? 1 ) [ ) +tonth to month I) [ ) Year to year 2) [ ) Skl season only 3) [ ] Summer season only 4) [ J Other: 15.' (IF RENT) Is your residence currently for sale? 1) [ 1 Yes 2) ( ) No 16. Including yourself, how many in your household are employed? 16a. (IF MARRIED OR LIVING TOGLTf1ER) Does your spouse/housemate work? 1) [ ] Yes 2 ) f 1 h'o 17a. What is the total monthly rent or mortgage payment for your residence? S OR [ 1 Not applicable, don't pay monthly charge 17b. What is the total monthly cost of the other expenses (utilities, taxes, insurance, excluding telephone)? OR [ ) Not applicable 17c. What is your share of the monthly cost for your residence (rent/mortgage -F utilities, excluding tellephone)? OR [ J Not applicable 17d. How many members of your household participate in paying for your residence? -3- 18. What is the value of your current residence; that is, low much do you think this house , and Iot or condominium unit would sell Yor if it were for sale? 1) [ ] Less than $50,000 2) [ $ 50,000 to $ G9,999 :~) [ ] s ~o,ooo to $ 99,699 3) [ ] $100,000 to $149,999 4) [ J $150,000 to $199,999 5) [ ] $200,000 to $299,999 6) [ ] $300,000 to $399,999 ~) [ ] $400,000 to $499,999 $) [ ] $500,000 or more 19. How much longer do you plan to live iii the region? 1) [ ] Through the ski season (19f39-9U) 2) [ ) 6 - 12 months 3) [ J 1 - 3 years 5) [ ] 3 - 5 years 6) [ ] 5 - 10 years 7) [ ] More. than 10 years 8) [ J Don't know 20. Rank the three factors that will most influence your decision in the event you leave tt~e region? Rank with 1 = Most Important, 2 Second Most Important, 3 = Third Most Important. (CHOOSE 3 ONLY, USE EACH NUMBER UNCE ONLY) O1) Desire for change in living environment U2) Disparity between wages and cost of housing 03) Growth and change in the town 04) Lack of adequate employment 05) Lack of adequate housing 06) Lack of professional opportunity O7) Location of family/friends O$) Return to school 09) 'l'oo expensive 10) Other: 11) [ J Do not plan to leave the Telluride area in the Foreseeable future 21. Thinking about your current residence and what you .are getting for your money, do you feel you are: 1) [ ] Getting a bargain 2) [ ] Paying the right amount 3) ( ] Paying too much 21a. Which choice best describes your satisfaction with your current residence? ~, 1) [ J Very satisfied 3)[ J Not satisfied 2) [ ] Satisfied 4) [ J Very dissatisfied 'Lib. Why do you feel that way'? -4 - 22. Uo you personally own a mutor vehicle? 1) [ ] Yes 2) [ ] No , 23. }fow do you usually get to work? If you usually use more than one method of transportation during the trip, check the box of the one used for most of t}~e distance. 1) ~( 1 Car, truck or van 2) [ ] Motorcycle 3) [ ] Bicycle 4) [ ] Walked 5) [ ] Work at home 6) [ ] Other: 7)~ [ ] Not applicable, don't work 24. How many automobiles, vans and trucks are kept at home for use by members of your household? 25.E (IF LIVE OUTSIDE T}iE TOWN) Would you pay to commute using a van shuttle service to/from your place of work? 1) [ ] Yes 2) [ ] No 3) [ ] Uncertain 26. (IF YES OR UNCERTAIN) What amount would you • consider a fair and reasonable price t'or a round trip commute to and Prom your place of work'? (CHECK ONE ONLY) 1) [ ] $1 2) [ ) $2 - 3 3) [ ) $4 - 5 4) [ ] $6 - 7 5) [ ] $8-9 27. Approximately how many round trips oer week does your household make to your place(s) oY work? -5- I~UTU{tE HOUSING NEEDS AND CONSIUERA'fIONS In the following questions, please keep in mind that price and residence type are related. Consider what you realistically could afford, not ,)ust an ideal. 28. F{ousins* Type Preference Please rank your housinc type preference using 1 through 3 with 1 as "Most Preferred," 2 as "2nd Preference," and 3 as "3rd Preference." Rank your top three only. Use each number once only. 1) Single tamily home 2) Duplex 3) Condominium/apartment 4) Mobile home 29. Residence Size Preference Please identify your preferred residence size. (CHECK ONE ONLY) 1) [ ] One bedroom 2) ( ) Two bedrooms 3) [ ] Three bedrooms 4) [ 1 Four bedrooms 30. Location Preference Please rank your location preference using 1 through 3 with 1 as "Most Preferred," 2 as "2nd Preference," 3 as "3rd Preference." Rank your top three only. Use each number once only. U1) Blue River 02) Breckenridge 03) Upper Blue, Unincorporated 04) Copper Mountain 05) Dillun 06) Dillon, Unincorporated 07) Frisco O$) Frisco, Unincorporated 09) Heeney, Lower Blue 10) Keystone, Snake River area, Summit Cove 11) Silverthorne 12) Silverthorne, Unincorporated 13) Not within Summit County (specify): ,~ -6- 31. llo you prefer to: (CHECK ONE ONLY) 1) ( ] Own 2) [ ] Rent 3) [ ] Lease with option to buy 32. What amenities are most important in your housing choice? Please rank those items which influence your housing choice using 1 through 5 with 1 as "Most Important," 2 as "2nd." 3 as "3rd." 4 as "4th ," and 5 as "5th Most Important." Rank your top five only. Use each number once only. O1) Ability to have pets 02) Dishwasher/disposal 03)' Laundry facilities 04) Location 05) On-site daycare 06) Parking nearby 07) Privacy 08) Private deck/patio space 09) Proximity to athletic facilities: Which ones: 10)` Proximity to employment 11) Proximity to skiing 12) Rental/guest rooms (available for visitors) 13) Storage 14) Usable yard area 15) Woodstove 33. If "affordable/employee" housing were provided in an acceptable location, would you rent or purchase a residence'? (CHECK ONE ONLY) 1) [ ] Yes - rent an employee residence 2) ( ] Yes - purchase an employee residence 3) [ ] No -neither rent or purchase an employee residence 4) [ ] Uncertain 34. Would you live in housing owned by and/or managed by your employer? 1) [ ] Yes 2) [ J No 3) [ ] Uncertain 35. If you intend to stay in the region, do you intend to purchase housing within the next 24 monihs? 1) [ 1 Yes 2) [ ] No 3) [ ) Uncertain -7- Finally, a few more questions to assist in classifying your responses. 36. What is your sex? 1) [ ] Male 2) [ ] Female 37. tVhat is your age? years old 38. Which of these categories best describes your marital status? 1) [ J Single (never married) 2) [ J Married 3) [ J Living together 4) [ J Separated 5) [ J Divorced 6) [ J Widowed 39. tVhat was the last level of school you completed? 1) [ ) Jr. high or less 2) [ J Some high school 3) [ J High school graduate 4) [ ] Some college 5) [ ] College graduate G) [ ) Some post graduate 7) [ ] Post graduate degree 40. What is your primary source of income? (CHECK UNE ONLY) O1) [ ] Ski Corporation 02) [ ] Bar/restaurant 03) [ ) Retail 04) [ ] Government 05) [ J Lodging 06) [ J Finance - 07) [ ] Construction 08) [ ] Professional 09) [ 1 Real estate/property management lU) [ ] Service il) f ] Retired 12) [ J Education 13) ( 1 Other: 40a. What is your secondary source of income, if applicable? (INSERT # FROM Q. 40 ABOVE) OR [ ] Not applicable, no secondary source -8- +1. ,rnat is your employee classification? 1) [ J Sales 2) [ ] Service 3) [ ] Professional 4) [ ] Management 5) [ ] Clerical G) [ ) Skilled Labor (Craft or Trade) 7) [ ] Unskilled Labor 8) [ ] Other - specify: 42. }iow long have you worked Yor your current employer? 1) [ ] 0 - 6 months 2) [ ] 6 months - 1 year 3) [ ] 1 - 3 years 4) [ ] 3 - 5 years 5 ) [ ] , 5 - 10 years 6) [ 1 Over 10 years 43. What is the location of your primary job? O1) [ ] Blue River 02) [ J Breckenridge 03) [ ] Upper Blue, Unincorporated 04) [ ] Copper Mountain 05) ( ) Dillon 06) [ ] Dillon, Unincorporated 07) ( ] Frisco 08) [ ] Frisco, Unincorporated 09) [ 1 Heeney, Lower Blue 10) [ ~ Keystone, Snake River area, Summit Cove 11) [ ] Silverthorne 12) [ ] Silverthorne, Unincorporated 13) [ ] Other: 44. How many '.lobs did you work last: a. Winter jobs b. Summer jobs 44a. }iow many hours per week di~i you work on average in winter? 44b. How many months per year do you work? 45a. What was your total annual household income for 1988 before taxes? (ESTIMATE SE{OULD INCLUDE ALL RESIDENTS OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD) S / per year before taxes HUUSEHOLD 45b. What is your individual annual income for 1988 before taxes? S / per year before taxes INDIVI}IUAL -9- 46. Have you had any housing problems since moving to Summit County? If so, what are they? 47. There iris been a lot of discussion about the housing situation iu Summit County for employees of local business. Ilow do you feel about it? 1) [ ] I believe it is the roost critical problem we have in this County. 2) [ ] I believe employee housing is one of the more serious problems. 3) [ ] It is a problem, but we have many others which also need solutions. 4) [ ] It is one of our lesser problems. 5) [ 1 I don't think it is a problem. Comments: 48. What would be the most important thing the Town, County, or private sector could do Lo improve the trousin~ situation in the region? 49. (IF PREFER TO OWN) If you prefer to own, how much can you and your partners afford as a down payment? 1) [ ] $ o - 4,999 4) [ ] $15,000 - 19,9ss 2) [ ) $ 5,000 - 9,999 5) [ ) $20,000 or more 3) [ ] $10,000 - 14,999 50a. (IF PREFER TO OWN) If you prefer to owtr, how much can you and/or your partners afford for a monthly mortgage payment? (principle and interest, nvt including utilities). If married or living together, please state the total amount available by you and your spouse together. 0) [ ] $ 0 - 399 6) [ J $1,400 - 1,599 1) [ ] $ 400 - 599 7) [ ] $1,600 - 1,799 2) [ ] s soo = 79s s} [ ] $1,800 - 1,999 3) [ ] $ 800 - 999 9) [ ] $2,000 or more 4) [ ] $1,000 - 1,199 5) [ ] $1,200 - 1,399 50b. (IF PREFER TO RENT) What can you afford to pay for rent (excluding utilities)? 0) [ ] $ 0 - 99 6) [ ] $ 600 - 699 ' 1) ( ] $ 100 - 199 7) [ ] $ 700 - 999 2) [ ] $ 200 - 299 8) [ ] $1,000 - 1,4ss 3) ( ] $ 300 - 399 9) [ ] $1,500 or more 4) [ ] $ 400 - 499 5) [ ] $ 500 - 599 Thank you very much for your participation. "~ -10- .Summit County Association of REALTORS REALTOR FO. Box 53~ / Crisco, Colorado 804~i3 (3G3) 0,~~-3024 REALTOR E~dPLOYEE HO1951QdG S(~RVEY In case you haven't heard (!) , the County is concerned about an inadequacy of housing for employees, during the peak season. Please take the time to respond to the following questions drafted b~ your Realtor Committee on Housing Issues: ~e need your Help! Yes = 26 ° Should the Realtor organization encourage Town and County No = 16 officials to relax zoning and development procedures to facilitate employee housing projects? [ ] Yes - [ j No Yes = 29 ° Would you, as a Realtor member and one active in the real No = 13 estate industry, support giving breaks to certain employee housing projects? Don't know = 1 [ ] Yes - [ ] No Yes = 6 ° Would you support such projects if it meant that such leniency No = 36 might establish a long-range precedent which might adversely impact property values? [ ) Yes - [ ] No Yes = 29 ° Do you feel that there is a crisis in Summit County regarding the No = 13 availability of seasonal employee housing for rent, that requires , ' emergency response by County officials? [ ] Yes - [ ] No Yes = 33 ° Would your clients and customers be discouraged from investing No = 5 in vacant land if the planning rec3ulations were enforced in an inconsistent manner? Don't know = 2 [ ] Yes - [ ] No Yes = 23 ° Do you feel that employers have a primary responsibility to insure No = 14 that there is appropriate housing for their seasonal requirements when they start operation? Don't know = 2 [ ] Yes - [ J No Yes = 14 ° Do you fell that there is enough land in Summit County presently No = 17 zoned for employee housing projects? [ ] Yes - ( ] No Don' t Know - 2 In Breckenridge? 4 Ys/8 Nn in Dillon? 4 Ys/8 NO In Frisco? 6 Ys/5 NO In Silverthorne? 12 Ys/1 No Yes = 20 ° Would you encourage officials to change master planning or No = ?0 planning procedures to accomodate certain employee housing requests by granting concessions to developers? [ ] Yes - [ ] No Yes No = = 34 5 ° Would variances through established development processes with public hearings be appropriate to accomodate employee housing projects? [ ] Yes - [ ) No Yes = 39 ° Do you feel that public officials need to be consi,tent with No = 3 existing development regulations and current zoning in order to maintain market v21ue of real est::te? Don't know = 3 [ ] Yes - [ ] No The following are some ways that have been discussed to provide employee housing. Please indicate yes or no as to whether or not the Realtor Association should support them: 'es = 15 1. Relax planning process to facilitate a project which would provide 'o = 25 employee housing [ ] Yes - [ ) No 's = 20 2. Change zoning which would increase density to provide greater ~ = 19 incentives to developer Maybe = 1 [ ) Yes - [ ] No •s = 24 3. Waiving of certain development fees, i.e, water and sewer tap = 17 fees, by town officials [ ] Yes - [ ] No (over) ~e Voice for Real EstateT~A in Summit Count "~ v ,.~.. ~~~..~ ~~~ SORVSY Draft 11 . saoaar covNrY 1/9/90 ~xDAars aovszNO ~s Asssss~arr saxvsr This survey 1s being done as part of the analysis of housing issues in Summit County. As a representative of the business sector, your response to these questions will help us understand the nature of the situation and possible solutions. Please answer the first eight questions. Zf you have time, we would appreciate your response on the remaining questions as well. thank you for your assistance. 1. Name of business (optional): ?. Business Iocatlon: Phone t: 3. Type of business: 4. Size of space occupied by your business: sq. ft. 4a. If lodging, number of rooms/units: S. Number of employees: ~~\\ Full time: t Permanent ~.~~,V.;~~~,-/~ ` `. Seasonal total Part-time: ~t1 Permanent Seasonal ~~' total ~ ~7 ~ Of the seasonal employees listed above, how many ~ returned from previous years this winter? 6. Nov many employees did you offer positions to this year that were unable to take the position because they couldn't find housing? Please explain: 7. Does your business offer housing for your employees? 2) ( ) Yes ?) ( ) No 7a. (IF YES): How many employees do you houseT 7b. (IF YES) What type is provided? 1 '7c. [IF YES) What is the monthly rent? 8. In your opinion, rank to order the reasons employees leave your business, with "1" - Host Important, "2" - Second Host Important, and "3" - Third Nost Important. (CHOOSE 3 ONLY. USE EACH NUNBER ONCE ONLY,) Desire for change Sn living environment Disparity bet wean wages and cost of housing Growth and change In the town q/ Lack of adequate employment ~~>~' Lack of adequate housing .~~~y'~ Lack of professlonel opportunity Location of family/friends Return to school Too expensive Other: 9. Overall, how would you rate your experience in finding employees this past year? DIFFI- VERY CULT EASY a. Winter 1989-90 I 2 3 4 5 b. Summer 1989 1 2 3 9 S c. Winter 2988-89 1 ? 3 4 5 20. In general, how would you rate your experience finding employees this winter season? 2) [ J Huch more difficult than in past years ?) [ J Nore difficult than in past years 3) [ J The same as in past years 4J ( J Easier than in past years 5) ( J Nuch easier than In past years lI. Do yo clos for off-season? Spring: ) [ J Yes ?) ( J No Fall: I) ( J Yes 21 ( ) No 1Ia. (IF YES) Do the same employees return after off-season? 1) (J Yes 2) [ J No I?. Describe your recruitment efforts In the past year (advertising, visits Co other locations, incentives offered, etc.). 2 13. Nov many of your employees (permanent/seasonal) need/use day care? Employees Do you~s6bsidize their expenses? 1) [ J Yes 2) ( ) No Do you help them obtain it? I) [) Yes ?J [ 1 No l~. Do you provide a ski pass to your employees? 1) [ 1 Yes ?J f 1 No What percentage of the total pass price do you pay? IS. What should the government do, if anything, to provide or encourage the provision of affordable housing? 16. What should the private sector do, if anything, to provide or encourage the provision of affordable housing? I~tXIC YOV POR YOCR SIJDi, IDEAS AND COJlOINTS. ~1r~~k ~~ \ I~^ (~~. 3 SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY Total Units 3500 3000 2500 cn ~_ z 2000 J Q ~ 1500 0 1000 500 0 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION Breck Un inc D illn Un inc Frsco Un inc Mtzma BIRvr S'thn Tenmi SnRvr Uninc SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY Total Units-By Type 3500 3000 2500 cn ~_ z 2000 Q ~ 0 1500 ~- 1000 500 0 Breck Uninc Dilln Uninc Frsco Uninc Mtzma BIRvr S'thn Tenmi SnRvr Uninc 1ST-OWN 1ST-RENT 2ND HOMES GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY Total Units-1st Homes by Type z Q ~-- 0 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Breck Un inc D illn Un inc Frsco Un inc Mtzma BIRvr S'thn Tenm i SnRvr GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION Uninc OWNERS RENTERS .. ., a VAIL TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION OF SYI~HONY OF SPORTS PROGRAM A g e n d a for Vail Town Council meeting Tuesday, December 19, 1989 1. Description of Symphony of Sports 1989; highlighting major similarities and changes for Symphony of Sports presentation for 1990 2. The benefits of the production of Symphony of Sports for the Vail Valley 3. Budget and Funding for Symphony of Sports 4. Questions and Discussion SYMPHONY OF SPORTS 1989 and 1990 WHAT IS SYMPHONY OF SPORTS? Symphony of Sports (SOS) is a new concept in entertainment. In its 1989 debut presentation in Vail, the two athletic entities of gymnastics and figure skating were combined in an artistic presentation for the first time. The combination of music, grace, and athletic prowess culminated in a magnificent presentation that was enjoyed by the local Vail community and viewed by an estimated 109, 822, 830 people by way of the ABC Wide World of Sports television special and various other media presentations. The 1989 Symphony of Sports event included ten various sports clinics sponsored by the Women's Sports Foundation. Each clinic featured a prominent female athlete who demonstrated and instructed in their areas of expertise. This aspect of SOS will not be included in the 1990 event. THE PERFORMERS - In the 1989 presentation, we were honored to witness the world class performances of: Bart Conner Peter Vidmar Scott Johnson Rristi Phillips Marcia Fredricks Rosalynn Summers Brian Boitano Peggy Flemming Robin Cousins This coming year we expect to have all of these exceptional athletes return to Vail and we hope to add: Raterina Witt - 1988 Women's 1988 Olympic Champion DATES: (NOTE: There will be 3 performances in 1990 in contrast to only one presentation in 1989) The 1989 event was held in the end of April. Even though this is not a priority visitor/tourist time of year, the program was supported by the local community with fervor. With the obvious difficulties of producing this event in Vail's active month of March, there are also many more positive aspects associated with a March presentation. ABC filming the Symphony of Sports in March will enable the network to present the program nationally on May 12, 1990. This date has a significantly higher viewer population than the June airing of 1989's performance. (2) An additional benefit of a March presentation is that we will be able to showcase Vail at its peak; Not only will panarama views of Vail in March be showcased but, we will also be able to insert film footage of Summer in Vail. The 1990 dates for Symphony of Sports will be: Arrival, Set Up and Rehearsal Monday, March 12 - Friday, March 16 Performances: Dress Rehearsal Friday, March 16, 1990 First Show Saturday, March 17, 1990 Second Show Sunday, March 18, 1990 (3) 1989 CARESS SYMPHONY OF SPORTS PROGRAM EVALUATION The following evaluates both the quantitative and qualitative results of the Symphony of Sports public relations benefits. This information is based on 90g of the data available in reference to the 1989 Caress Symphony of Sports. The program resulted in a viewer population of 109,822,830 impressions (viewers). Publicity and Presentations before and after the event were made through the following media: - ABC-TV Network Wide World Of Sports Presentation - Public Vail Presentation - Signage - Frank Gifford announcements - Athlete interviews - Airline movie presentations - Satellite Television Media Tour - National Television Presentation with spokespersons to be on national programs: Good Morning America, Regis, Entertainment Tonight, CNN Show Biz Tonight, and Hour Magazine. - International Viewing - 7 Countries - American Airlines, and Japan Airlines movie presentations - Radio.- an advertising radio tape to expected to reach approximately 2.6 million listeners. - Magazine advertising (anticipated circulation 25 Million) - Newspaper advertising anticipated to appear. in 25 million issues; 350 of the largest daily papers. AN INCREASE IN MEDIA PRESENTATION FOR 1990 A total increase viewership/circulation is anticipated to be 124.2 million for the 1990 presentation. (An approximate 15 million viewer increase over 1989.) SYMPHONY OF SPORTS BUDGET 1989 1990 INCOME Gate Receipts $ 13,315.00 $ 63,000 (see below) Town of Vail contribution $ 16,500 $ 25,000 TICKET REVENUE Dress Rehearsal (650 @ $20) $ 13,000 1st Show (1,000 @ $2S) $ 2S 000 2nd Show (1,000 @ $ZS) $ 25,000 Total Ticket Revenue $ 63,000 TOTAL INCOME $ 29,815 $ 88,000 EXPENSES LODGING ........................................ $ 0.00 $ 27,000 FOOD .............................................. $13,986.71 $ 14,000 (2 banquets) TRANSPORTATION ......................... $ 2,047.21 $ 3,100 (Denver to Vail, local) PRINTING ..................................... $ 1,729.31 $ 2,000 (tickets, posters) ADVERTISING ............................... $ 4,523.50 $ 5,000 (local only) SALARY ........................................ $ 1,068.30 $ 2,400 (2 assts. 2 wks. prior) DECORATIONS ................................ $ 1,869.92 VOLUNTEERS ................................. $ 1,347.96 $ 1,500 OPERATING .................................... $ 678.97 $ 1,500 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE........... $ 27,251.88 $ 56,500 CONTRACTOR FEES (50% of gate).... $ 6,657.50 $ 31,500 TOTAL EVENT BUDGET $ 33,909.38 $ 88,000 NET INCOME (loss)........ ($ 4,094.38) $ even NOTE; THIS BUDGET DOES NOT INCLUDE THESE ESTIMATED INDIRECT COSTS TO VMRD Dobson Arena; Stafj time, foregone revenue $ 16,000 ( 8 days at $ 2,000 p/day ) VMRD; Staff time, office support $ 10,000 $ 26,000 .,, ~owo of uai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2116 MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Phillips Vail Town Council FROM: Greg Hall ~~~~ DATE: January 11, 1990 RE.: Additional Positions in Engineering Division In years past, the Town of Vail budget was comprised primarily of operating and debt service expenses with a small amount of capital projects. In contrast, the 1990 budget includes over $5 million of capital projects as well as planning and design for several million dollars in future projects. The Town's attempts to manage this growing capital project load without increasing professional staff has resulted in excessive consultant costs and numerous project delays. The proposed addition of a Town of Vail survey crew in order to solve these problems represents a recognition of the new reality of a large and growing capital project component within the Town's budget. The 1990 Heavy Equipment Fund budget, approved .this last fall, contains three new positions to be added to the Town staff. During the approval process, the Council requested some additional back-up information to be presented prior to recruiting for these positions. The positions are a Town Surveyor, Construction Inspector/Design Technician, and a Drafter. In addition to these full-time positions, a seasonal surveying assistant would be hired during the summer months. The creation of the requested positions allows the Town to perform in-house many of the tasks currently contracted out to private engineering firms. The cost of these engineering and survey contracts is currently budgeted within the various capital projects which are approved each year. Under the proposed new system, the full costs of the additional employees will be charged out to capital projects in place of some of the private contracts. The full annualized cost (after spreading initial capital costs over a number of years and including estimated liability insurance) of the proposed survey crew is approximately $160,000. As shown in the graph below, the hiring of an in-house crew should produce substantial cost savings on the Town's capital projects. EXISTING METHODOLOGY: YEAR ALL SERVICES CONTRACTED 1989 $201,781 1990 $430,475 $159,273 $261,031 $ 42,508 $169,444 In addition to being cost effective, the new Town survey crew should also provide the: Town with the following important new services: o Mapping of Town property lines, streets, utilities, etc. o Design drafting o More timely project surveys o Additional construction inspection o Plat checks .and verification o Town property management and inventory As requested by the Council, staff has checked the price of having survey services provided on an annual contract basis by a local firm. The resulting bid would have provided only about one-half of the needed services at a cost higher than the full annualized cost of the Town's in-house crew. This option is clearly not desirable. A thorough analysis of this matter leads me to the conclusion that the Town of Vail will recognize both substantial cost savings and improved services by hiring its own survey crew. I look forward to discussing the issue in detail with Town Council next Tuesday. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY: BOTH IN-HOUSE AND CONTRACTED SERVICES SAVINGS A 1989 BUDGET PROJECT (IN MILLIONSI POTATO PATCH 51.300 STREETS EAST VAIL 50.205 BIKE PATH EAST VAIL SO.liS BRIDGE TOWN AERIALS 50.035 MEADOW DRIVE AMPHITHEATER GOLDEN PEAK BUS WASH 80.309 BOOTHS FALLS 50.350 DITCH PULIS BRIDGE GORE CREEK BRIDGE PARKING STRUCTURE TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS f23,300, 43,000 i ~i 46,940 531,500 !11,600 543,000 EYISTING METHODOLOGY OF CONTRACTING SERVICES SURVEYING DESIGN 552,970 592,000 511,103 510,313 (2,600 51,860 53,500 55,500 51,200 51,000 f4,000 57,000 53,000 51,700 58,000 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 525,400 i f6,8751 55,0601 f7,S00~ STREAMWALK 50.1501 ( f1,200 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING flOTH IN-HOUSE AND CONTRACTED SERVICES SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 591,477 532,887 519,890 48,699 58,075 55,383 52,036 51,860 53,962 52,791 54,307 5940 5783 59,000 55,481 45,873 52,349 51,331 56,264 5940 TOTALS .52.535 (119,340 (98,773 458,173 544,835 577,343 546,822 GRAND TOTAL 5119,340 4201,781 5159,273 SAVINGS PROVIDED BY USING IN-HOUSE TOWN SERVICES (201,781 - 4159,27s s 542,508 435,108 r 1990 BUDGET- ECHNICAL PROJECT (IN MILLIONS) PECIALISTS GORE CREEK 50.030 4300 PROMENADE MILL CREEK 40.015 5150 LANDSCAPING SKI MUSEUM (0.010 4100 SITE IMPROVEMENTS VILLAGE 40.500 510,000 IMPROVEMENT DIST MASTER TRANS. 50.080 560,000 PLAN LANDSCAPING 40.190 495D SIDEVALK SO.O1S 575 IMPROVEMENTS POST OFFICE f0.?00 563,000 REMODEL/PARKING LOT HUS SHELTER 40.030 IMPROVEMENTS PEDESTRIAN 41.200 475,000 OVERPASS SNO1,i DUMP 40.100 41,000 SITE PATHS 50.070 41,050 MAINTENANCE INTERMOUNTAIN f1.100 529,700 STREETS BIKE PATH BRIDGE 40.090 46,320 EAST VAI6 ~ 'EXISTING METHODOLOGY OF CONTRACTING SERVICES SURVEYING DESIGN f1,500 4750 f50D f8,7S0 (4,000 59,500 4688 (1,750 f600 57,500 f5,D00 51,300 438,800 Sa,eoo 5540 5270 5180 417,500 512,000 53,420 5575 428,000 54,000 82,000 f84,100 43,500 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ~I 52,SOD 51,750 525,000 54,200 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING HOTH IN-HOUSE AHD CONTRACTED SERVICES SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 51,127 5170 5563 589 5376 556 56,573 517,500 S4,OD0 512,000 57,137 51,063 S5t7 5179 51,315 5471 55,634 528,000 53,756 51,243 5350 5977 5621 5250 529,148 519,914 53,400 S1,9S3 53,500 5575 1990 PROJECTS BUDGET TECHNICAL CONT. (IN MILLIONS SPECYALISTS RECREATION 50.168 41,500 TRAILS DONOVAN PARK 50.550 512,000 STEVENS PARK 50.030 51,500 AMPHITHEATER 50.045 51,100 GOLDEN PEAK PARKING SO.11S 52,500 STRUCTURE ROADWAYS ~EZISTING METHODOLOGY OF 'CONTRACTING SERVICES SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT f7,56D 59,240 69,200 527,500 59,900 S1,S00 5590 51,200 52,475 5800 53,162 56,325 52,875', (PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING BOTH iIN-HOUSE AND CONTRACTED SERVICES 'SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 55,679 52,871 5575 520,659 33,076 51,127 5168 5901 5769 5130 52,375 56,325 52,875 PULIS BRIDGE 50.215 515,020 54,300 S3,OD0 510,750 53,23D 53,000 51,968 GORE CREEK 50.165 54,200 53,300 52,$25 58,250 52,479 52,625 51,130 BRIDGE WILLOW BRIDGE 40.350 421,200 59,200 59,200 53,155 S4,2D0 MEADOW DRIVE SO.S00 51,000 516,000 416,000 DOWD JUNCTION 50.600 532,200 518,000 f7,800 518,D00 513,322 47,800 52,460 BIKE PATH , TOTALS , f$.868 5339,865 6153,960 5198,190 578,325 5116,679 4131,164 513,193 GRAND TOTAL 5339,865 5430,475 c , SAVINGS PROVIDED BY USING Ik-HOUSE TOWN SERVICES 5490,475 - 5261,031 a 41$9,444 HOWEVER, NEED TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL ENGINEER TO ACCOMPLISH DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WORK AT S50,ODD 5169,444 (EZPECTED SAVINGS) - 430,000 s 5119,444