HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-01-16 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessiont
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1.:990
12:00 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Discussion of Affordable Housing Project with Planning and
Environmental Commission and Rosall, Remmen and Cares, Inc.
2. Review of Planning and Environmental Commission Conditions of
Approval for the Vail Village Parking Structure Expansion
3. Symphony of Sports Update
4. Discussion of Survey Crew Budget Item
5. Information Update
6. Other
7. Executive Session - Personnel Matter
8. Site Visit - Faessler Site for Employee Units
Location: Between Buildings C and D of the Meadow Greek
Condominiums on Kinnickinnick Road in Intermountain
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1990
12:00 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
12:00 1. Discussion of affordable housing project with PEC and
Peter Patten Rosall, Remmen and Cares
Nolan Rosall
Chris Cares Action Requested of Council: Discuss issues as per enclosed
agenda. Make decisions as necessary during the meeting.
Background Rationale: The Council has requested this
project to address, define, and take action on the
affordable housing problem.
2:00 2. Review of PEC conditions of approval for the Vail Village
Peter Patten Parking Structure expansion
Stan Berryman
Action Requested of Council: Discuss the priority of add
alternates for the parking structure and determine if it is
necessary to appeal the PEC's approval because of the
conditions of approval.
Background Rationale: The PEC approved the Vail Village
parking structure with the condition that the entire project
be constructed, including the fifth level overpass,
renovation of the existing transit facility, community
improvements (bikepaths, sidewalks), and widening of East
Meadow Drive. The PEC felt that these four add alternates
were necessary and that they must be part of the project.
The PEC requested to be involved in any prioritization of
the add alternates if deemed necessary by the Town Council.
2:30 3. Symphony of Sports Update
Pat Dodson
Background Rationale: VMRD is reappearing before the
Council to update on the progress of the Symphony of Sports.
2:50 4. Discussion of Survey Crew Budget Item
Steve Barwick
Stan Berryman Action Requested of Council: Receive presentation and
Greg Hall approve/deny/modify staff plans.
Background Rationale: The addition of an in-house survey
and design crew was approved by Council during the 1990
budget process. Several Councilmembers have requested that
staff prepare .and present a more in-depth justification
before these positions are filled.
Staff Recommendation: ,4pprove staff plans to recruit for an
in-house survey and design crew.
3:15 5. Information Update
Ron Phillips
3:20 6. Other
3:30 7. Executive Session - Personnel Matter
Larry Eskwith
4:00 8. Site Visit - Faessler site for employee units
Mike Mollica Location: Between Buildings C and D of the Meadow Creek
Condominiums on Kinnickinnick Road in Intermountain
RCaSALL REMMEN CARES
i~ir~rvt`~iru:.;. _~r;~.nr~ ~~i.:.;;r;rv nrai~ ~~rsiai+CH
AGENDA
VAiL E1KPLaYEE HnUSINC WORKSHOP
January id, 1990
Hi,:..~ti kr'Mhtl'NnN[.'C:,~IIL`%.iNr.~
I. piscussion oP principal Qlternsatives which could be utilized in
expanding affordable housing opportunities
a) Amendments to land use regulations
1. Requirements related to ma,~or developments
generating new employees
2. PerFocmance standards incorporated rota
SU1? section
3. "Caretak~c" units
4. other Gode reviAinns and/or incentives
b} Utilization of publicly owned land within and
outside current Tawn boundariaa as a catalyst
to create such housing
1. Town of Vail owned parcels
2. county or Avon owned parcels
3. U.S. Rorest Lands
c} Improve utilization and availability of current
supply of ercond homes by Iang-term or seasonal
employees
d} Regional solutions
1. Coordinated Town and t;aur-ty ePFocta
2. Creat.fan cif a "Regional" Housing Authority
and referral agency
3. Coordinated public transit
e) Expand Funding sources
]. Public/private partnerships
2. ftousi.ng Trust Fund
3. Impact f9es
4. Other
f) Other to be identified
Post-it'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 ~ or pages - .k),,
,~ F-om v ~ ,~. ,
t~ ~ I
Co. Ca. ``~~~~
Tip, ,a1 ~r ,1[!r/ !{.rr('., ___.
R~SALL REMMEN CARES
fq nrJNifJ(~+ UN~IP~h ;:: ~di~:;Pd ,1N(~, ~~t Sl.,v~f:~ I
AGENDA {cant.}
VAIL EMPl:OYEE HOUSING WQRK3HOP
January 18, 1990
II. Philosaphtnal discussion of the appropriate balance between directly
improving employees' ability to purchase or rent housing through wage
increases or allowances versus encouraging expansion in the supply of
availr~blc "designated" employee units
III. Prioritiretion of alternatives to Yocus attention and developmr~nt of a
follow-up program. Consider creation of mini-task force{s) from
participants to assist consultant and staff, and developing specific
recommendations.
IV. Other issues
a} Staff resources
b} pacumentation of need
SCT~vIMIT COUNTY
AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY
AGREEhfENT
(Preliminary Draft -Subject
to Discussion and Review)
Prepared For:
' 'The Northwest Council of Governments
Housing Steering Committee
Prepared By:
Ros<~ll Remmen Cares, Inc.
1426 Pearl Street, Suite 200
Boulder, CO 80302
303/49-6558
January 3, 1990
Letter of Agreement for Professional Services
Related to Local Employees Survey
and Associated Consulting Services
Concerning Affordable Housing
e..,- ~-- - -,
This agreement is made as of January
Council of Governments (NWCOG) as
(RRC) as "Consultant.''
\.__
1990, bet~ti~een the Northwest
"Contractor" and Rosall Renunen and Cares, Inc.
1. Survey Design and Testing
Consultant will assume primary responsibility for the design and review of the survey
instrument to be used in Summit County. In preparing the survey, we will work closely
with the Steering Committee to establish appropriate wording that would address local
issues as they are presently defined, and ensure comparability to the maximum extent
possible with past studies and research. This joint effort will determine the appropriate
length of the questionnaire, the priorities for topics to be addressed, and the optimal
method for obtaining the best possible sample of employees of businesses located in
Summit County.
It is assumed that RRC will undertake final formatting of the survey instnunent and print
the forms. Consultant will distribute the forms in an agreed-upon manner, generally
consisting of personal visits to a sample of approximately 10 to 15 of the largest area
employers, and a mailing to a sample of the remaining employers. The design of the
sample will be such that 400 to 500 completed questionnaires are anticipated, allowing an
accurate profiling of demographics and attitudes of residents in Summit County and some
stratification of geographic subareas.
f _ .,__
.~ The 1VW000/C unty will be responsible for providing and coordinating an "incentive"
designed to improve response rates and interest in the study.
2. Data Entry and Compilation
Consultant will be responsible for entering the raw survey. forms into the computer and
will generate a series of tables describing the results of the study. Further, the Consultant
will prepare lists of a selection of the "open-ended" comments sufficient to allow local
leaders to review results and have sufficient feel for the types of comments and
suggestions that. are being made. If a complete tabulation of the open-ended comments is
desired, Consultant will work with local staff to assist in preparing such lists, but the
actual clerical work will be done by local staff.
3. ~~lcxisting Conditions Summary
In' conjunction with the County Planning Staff, ItRC will prepare an analysis of existing
units designed to determine existing numbers of units by type, occupancy status with a
rough determination of whether the units are in the managed "pool" or used primarily by, ~~_
owners. We have -established the cost of this analysis to be up to $1,200. We do not
propose to do a complete windshield inventory of units; rather, by working through staff,
homeowners associations, etc., we will attempt to develop the best possible data base for
the allocated budget. '~~,.
cr' a_a
4. Summary Report with Appropriate Graphics
At the conclusion of the data collection phase of the study, the Consultant will assume
primary responsibility for preparing choosing-oriented report that summarizes the
findings from the study. The two primary purposes of the report will be to: 1)
Document tl~e survey methodology, any lunitations to the data collected, and the means
by which interested individtaals can access the full data base that was generated; and 2) '""~ S~`~'1
Interpret and summarize the key findings from the study in a "short format" report (8 to ~~. ~ z ~~-~
12 pages) that describes results and implications as a source of direction for generating '"~ t~ ,ter,
local policy. Wherever possible, the report will utilize charts and graphs to illustrate data
collected by the survey.
5. Work Session on Research Results
Upon completion of the survey analysis, the Consultant would hold a "cvorking meetuig"
with the Task Force to address prelinnary results. This meeting would examine the
implications of preliminary findings and would set the agenda and work program for the
final step of the consulting effort, the Planning Analysis and Recommendations.
6. Planning Analysis and Recommendations c~ -~-~' "-~ - ~" ~ `~~' `""''' ~'~
Following the work session, the Consultant team will apply the research findings to a list
of topics to include, at a minimum,. the following objectives and issues as identified in
advance by the Housing Steering Committee:
a) Units needed for permanent, rental and temporary housing.
b) Type of units needed: single-family, townhouse, dormitory, other (what
would be purchased, rented, etc.?)
c) Who are the potential users? Where do they want to live and work? What
is their income?
d) What has happened to existing "affordable" housing? Have there been
changes in local attitudes or priorities toward housing?
e) Is "enforcement" of regulations an issue?
f) In addition, the idea of developing a local "model" to project housing needs
has been identified as a possibility. RRC has experience in developing such
models and is confident that the data that will be generated through the
survey will apply to the model; however, the creation of a model is not
included in this Agreement/Scope of Services..
g) How should the review and integration of local planning standards and
regulations be approached?
This analysis will result. in a working document suitable for public presentation at a
public meeting. It will be a sununary report designed to set direction, identify priorities,
and generally outline amulti-dimensional strategy to monitor and address affordable
housing needs and solutions.
2
This final work product will be deterntined, in part, by issues t11at arise in the course of
the study and by the desires of the Steering Committee. RP.C is proposing to work on an
hourly basis to complete this work with the total fee for this task to be $1,500. If work
beyond the $],500 fee is desired by the Steering Committee, it will be negotiated
separately.
The final report will contain an overview discussion of various alternatives for programs
that may exist, such as:
• Bond funds
• Purchase of existing units
• Purchase of new units (build)
• Public/private partnerships
• "Incentives" such as land use/density considerations, subsidies such as
guaranteed rent and damage deposit, free or low-cost land, etc.
• I~Tew institutions or modifications to existing institutions
• Income from real estate escrows as a source of funds
• Alternatives to purchasing 1<3nd
It is intended that the Steering Committee will identify three to four strategies that will be
addressed by the consultants in this phase of work.
The Consultant shall provide 20 copies of the Research Results summary, 20 copies of the
Draft Report, t~vo copies of the full data that is generated during the study
(crosstabulation tables), and one camera-ready copy of the final report.
7. Period of Service
The period of service under this Agreement shall commence January ]0, 1990, and shall
expire on March 31, 1990. The provisions of this Agreement and the compensation for
the Consultant's services have been agreed to in anticipation of an orderly and continuous
progress of the project. Should the project be delayed or suspended in part beyond 60
days by the Contractor or any governmental authority or any cause beyond the control of
the Consultant, this contract shall be terminated.
8. Agreement Amendment
The estimated cost of this Agreement shall not be increased or deemed to be increased,
except by specific written notification to the Contractor by "Change Order" indicating the
new amount to be allotted to the Agreement. Amendments to this Agreement as to
allowable charges or statements of work shall be by "Change Order;' the form and
content of which shall be prescribed by the Contractor. Changes to the Agreement shall
be executed in writing by duly authorized representatives of the Contractor and the
Consultant.
9. Time Schedule for Completion of Research and Related Documents.
The Consultant's services shall be provided in strict accordance with the following
schedule:
3
Meeting Date
1/2/90
1/10/90
Mid-February
Early March: Same
Day
Early March:
Primary Responsibility Purpose
RRC Survey Review
RRC Survey and Contract Finalization
RRC Review Summary Results
RRC Review Final Draft Report with
Steering Committee
RRC Review draft in Public Meeting with
County Commissioners
,'~.~ In addition, one or more meetings of tI~NWCOG~teering Comnttee will be held
independent of P.RC to review alternative strategies to determine emphasis of Consultant's
analysis efforts, as described in Section 6.
10. Specific Charges
The total cost of the proposed services shall .not exceed $10,000, including reimbursable
expenses. Further, the cost of the Existing Conditions Summary component shall not
exceed $1,200, billed hourly (approximately 24 hours at $50/hour). The cost of the
Strategic Planning Analysis shall not exceed $1,500 billed hourly (approximately 30 hours
of work at $50/hour). The Northwest Council of Governments will pay the Consultant
on the basis of its time and direct expenses incurred in order to provide the services
required by this Agreement.
a) The charge for time shall consist of the hourly billing rates specified below.
It is understood by the parties that the billing rates cover profit and
overhead, including, but not limited to, taxes, employee benefits, secretarial
and adnunistrative support staff and supplies, office rent and utilities, and
insurance. The Consultant's primary employees who' will work on the project
and their hourly salaries are as follows:
Hourly
Billing
Name Title Rate
Nolan Rosall Principal $100.00
C. Christian Cares Project Manager $80.00
Matthew Gilbert and Senior Analysts $45.00
Mike Simone
Clerical Services $20.00-$28.00
4
b) ~ Direct expenses incurred~by_the Consultant in connection with the project shall
be clkarged to the NWCOG, on the basis of the expenses actually incurred by
the Consultant, wtthout any additional surc}k~rge added by it. Such direct
' expenses shall include such items as costs related to printing and reproduction
costs, and long distance telephone clkarges.
D~-
c) Upon reasonable advance request, the C-i~ gray inspect and copy any or all
~ rectyor~ds of the Consultant which woulc~Uear on any amounts charged to the
NuxS ~~~ursuant to this Agreement.
d) Consultant may bill its charges to Contractor for its services and expenses
hereunder not more than once a month. Each bill shall cover only the
services performed and expenses incurred since the last bill, or in the instance
of tl~e initial bill, since the date services began.
Contractor will pay each bill tti~ithin 45 days of its receipt. If Contractor fails
to pay Consultant in frill, within 30 days of the receipt of the bill, the amount
due shall include a late charge at the rate of 1-1/2 percent per month from
the 45th day.
Upon reasonable advance request, Contractor may inspect and copy any or all
records of Consultant which would bear upon and amounts charged to
Contractor in any particular bill or bills.
Each monthly bill shall include a statement which summarizes the time
worked and general tasks undertaken by individual members of the
Consultant team, including in-house personnel.
The Contractor shall hold a retainer, not to exceed 10% of the total contract
amount ($1,000) until delivery of the final camera-ready document that
concludes the work program.
11. Termination of Agreement
y
a) This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ,15 days'. written
notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in ~~accordance with
the terms herein set forth.
b) Tn the event of termination of Agreement by Contractor, the Consultant shall
be paid compensation for its services performed to termination date.
c) In the event of termination, Consultant shall deliver to Contractor the originals
of all documents which it prepared .pursuant to this Agreement up to the
termination date.
12. Ownership of Documents
Drawings, reports and the final document delivered to Contractor shall be Contractor's
property. All documents and copies thereof, prepared by Consultant in connection. with
this Agreement, which it is required to deliver to Contractor, shall be and remain
Contractor's property. Both parties are authorized to retain for their records and use said
final documents in any manner and for any purpose they deem appropriate.
5
13. Insurance
' a) Minimum Amounts
The Consultant shall carry the following minimum amounts of insurance:
1) VVorlcmen's Compensation in statutory linuts.
2) Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Policy for amounts not
less than:
Bodily Injury
X150,000 each person, including death
X400,000 each occurrence
Probe Damage
$100,000 each occurrence
b) Coverage
Said insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of
this Agreement and shall protect the Consultants, their employees,
subcontractors, agents and representatives, and the NWCOG from claims for
damages for personal injury and wrongful death and for damages to property
arising in any manner from negligent or ~vrongful acts of the Consultant, their
employees, agents or representatives, in the performance of the services
covered herein.
14. Subcontracting
Consultant shall not engage any other subcontractors to perform services required by this
Agreement without the advance ~ti~ritten approval of Contractor.
15. Successors and Assigns
Contractor and the Consultant each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,
successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party ~~~ith respect to all
covenants of this Agreement. Neither Contractor nor the Consultant shall assign or
transfer their interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other.
16. Governing Law
Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Colorado,
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed as of the day and year first written
above.
NWCOG
Authorized Representative
ATTEST:
Secretary
ROSALL RE?~iMEN AND CARES, INC.
President
7
• SUMFIIT COUNTY IiOUSING AU'fIIORITI' URAF1' Stl
EMPLOYEE HOUSING SURVEY 12-29'89
PLEASE RETURN THE SURVEY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVE LOPE '
BY MAIL OR BY DROPPING IT IN THE BOX AT THE
SUMMIT COUNTY COURTHOUSE DY
1F•. ~ ' ~
~~ .
F ~ -`-' J
~
~ ~~ ~
~
PRESENT HOUSING Rosail, Remmen, and Cares, Inc.
la. ~+Ih ere do you live? (CIiECK IN BOX BELOW)
01) [ ] Blue River
02) [ ] Breckenridge
03) [ ] Upper Blue, Unincorporated
04) [ 1 Copper Mountain
05) '~ [ ] .Dillon
06) [ ]Dillon, Unincorporated
07) [ ] Frisco
08) [ ] Frisco, Unincorporated
09) [ ] Heeney, Lower Blue
10) [ ] Keystone, Snake River area, Summit Cove
11) [ ] Silverthorne
12) [ ] Silverthorne, Unincorporated
13) ~' [ 1 Other:
2. What type of residence do you live in?
1) [ ] Single family house
2) [ ] Duplex, triplex, fourplex
3) [ J Apartment/condominium
4) [ ] Mobile home
5) [ ] Cabin
6) [ ] Room
7) [ ] Apartment in house
8) [ ] Other:
3. Number of bedrooms in your residence?
1) [ ] Studio
2) [ ] One bedroom
3) ( ] Two bedrooms
4) [ ] Three bedrooms
5) ( 1 Four bedrooms
6) [ ] Five bedrooms or more
4. Including yourself, how many adults 18 or
over live in your residence?
Adults
5. How many children live in your residence?
(ENTER 0 IF NONE)
Children
6. (IF Cf1ILDREN) Ilow many children do you have
in the following age groups living in your
residence'?
a. 3 and under
b. 4 - 8 years old
c. 9 - 14 years oid
d. I5 - I7 years old
-1-
' 7. Is your residence in this area:
1) f ) Seasonal (6 months per year or less)
2) ( ] Permanent (greater than 6 months)
8. (IF SEASONAL) Now many years have you been
coming to the Summit County region?
1) [ ] Less than one year
2) [ ] Two years
3) [ ] Three years
4) [ ] Four years
5) [ 1 Five years
6) ( ] More than five
9. (IF SEASONAL) During which seasons are you
in Summit County? (CHECK ALL T}fAT APPLY)
1) ( ] Spring
2) ~[ ] Summer
3) [ ] Fall
4) [ ] Winter
10. (IF PERMANENT) How many years have you
resided in the Summit County region?
1) ( ] Less than 3 months
' 2) ( ] Three to six months
3) [ ) Six months to 1 year
4) ( ] One up to 3 years
5) [ ] Three up to 5 years
6) [ ] Five up to 10 years
7) ( ] More than 10 years
11 . ( IF CON'T'INUOUSLY IN TIfE AREA) In how many
separate residences have you lived in the
last:
a. One year?
b. Three years?
12. On a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is "No Problem"
and 5 is "Very Difficult," please rate your
experience finding housing in the Summit
• County region:
No
Problem
a. Housing in an
acceptable
condition 1
b. Housing in an
acceptable
location 1
c. Affordable .
housing 1
Very
Difficult
2 3 9 5
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
-2-
i3. Oo you presently:
1) [ j Own
2) [ ) Rent
3) [ J Rent a room
4) ( 1 House sit/caretake
5) [ J Other:
14. (IF RENT) What are the terms of your
rental?
1 ) [ ) +tonth to month
I) [ ) Year to year
2) [ ) Skl season only
3) [ ] Summer season only
4) [ J Other:
15.' (IF RENT) Is your residence currently for
sale?
1) [ 1 Yes
2) ( ) No
16. Including yourself, how many in your
household are employed?
16a. (IF MARRIED OR LIVING TOGLTf1ER) Does your
spouse/housemate work?
1) [ ] Yes
2 ) f 1 h'o
17a. What is the total monthly rent or mortgage
payment for your residence?
S
OR [ 1 Not applicable, don't pay monthly
charge
17b. What is the total monthly cost of the other
expenses (utilities, taxes, insurance,
excluding telephone)?
OR [ ) Not applicable
17c. What is your share of the monthly cost for
your residence (rent/mortgage -F utilities,
excluding tellephone)?
OR [ J Not applicable
17d. How many members of your household
participate in paying for your residence?
-3-
18. What is the value of your current residence;
that is, low much do you think this house ,
and Iot or condominium unit would sell Yor
if it were for sale?
1) [ ] Less than $50,000
2) [ $ 50,000 to $ G9,999
:~) [ ] s ~o,ooo to $ 99,699
3) [ ] $100,000 to $149,999
4) [ J $150,000 to $199,999
5) [ ] $200,000 to $299,999
6) [ ] $300,000 to $399,999
~) [ ] $400,000 to $499,999
$) [ ] $500,000 or more
19. How much longer do you plan to live iii the
region?
1) [ ] Through the ski season (19f39-9U)
2) [ ) 6 - 12 months
3) [ J 1 - 3 years
5) [ ] 3 - 5 years
6) [ ] 5 - 10 years
7) [ ] More. than 10 years
8) [ J Don't know
20. Rank the three factors that will most
influence your decision in the event you
leave tt~e region? Rank with 1 = Most
Important, 2 Second Most Important,
3 = Third Most Important. (CHOOSE 3 ONLY,
USE EACH NUMBER UNCE ONLY)
O1) Desire for change in living environment
U2) Disparity between wages and cost of
housing
03) Growth and change in the town
04) Lack of adequate employment
05) Lack of adequate housing
06) Lack of professional opportunity
O7) Location of family/friends
O$) Return to school
09) 'l'oo expensive
10) Other:
11) [ J Do not plan to leave the Telluride area
in the Foreseeable future
21. Thinking about your current residence and
what you .are getting for your money, do you
feel you are:
1) [ ] Getting a bargain
2) [ ] Paying the right amount
3) ( ] Paying too much
21a. Which choice best describes your
satisfaction with your current residence? ~,
1) [ J Very satisfied 3)[ J Not satisfied
2) [ ] Satisfied 4) [ J Very dissatisfied
'Lib. Why do you feel that way'?
-4 -
22. Uo you personally own a mutor vehicle?
1) [ ] Yes
2) [ ] No ,
23. }fow do you usually get to work? If you
usually use more than one method of
transportation during the trip, check the
box of the one used for most of t}~e
distance.
1) ~( 1 Car, truck or van
2) [ ] Motorcycle
3) [ ] Bicycle
4) [ ] Walked
5) [ ] Work at home
6) [ ] Other:
7)~ [ ] Not applicable, don't work
24. How many automobiles, vans and
trucks are kept at home for use by members
of your household?
25.E (IF LIVE OUTSIDE T}iE TOWN) Would you pay to
commute using a van shuttle service to/from
your place of work?
1) [ ] Yes
2) [ ] No
3) [ ] Uncertain
26. (IF YES OR UNCERTAIN) What amount would you
• consider a fair and reasonable price t'or a
round trip commute to and Prom your place of
work'? (CHECK ONE ONLY)
1) [ ] $1
2) [ ) $2 - 3
3) [ ) $4 - 5
4) [ ] $6 - 7
5) [ ] $8-9
27. Approximately how many round trips
oer week does your household make to your
place(s) oY work?
-5-
I~UTU{tE HOUSING NEEDS AND CONSIUERA'fIONS
In the following questions, please keep in mind
that price and residence type are related.
Consider what you realistically could afford, not
,)ust an ideal.
28. F{ousins* Type Preference
Please rank your housinc type preference
using 1 through 3 with 1 as "Most
Preferred," 2 as "2nd Preference," and 3 as
"3rd Preference." Rank your top three
only. Use each number once only.
1) Single tamily home
2) Duplex
3) Condominium/apartment
4) Mobile home
29. Residence Size Preference
Please identify your preferred residence
size. (CHECK ONE ONLY)
1) [ ] One bedroom
2) ( ) Two bedrooms
3) [ ] Three bedrooms
4) [ 1 Four bedrooms
30. Location Preference
Please rank your location preference using 1
through 3 with 1 as "Most Preferred," 2 as
"2nd Preference," 3 as "3rd Preference."
Rank your top three only. Use each number
once only.
U1) Blue River
02) Breckenridge
03) Upper Blue, Unincorporated
04) Copper Mountain
05) Dillun
06) Dillon, Unincorporated
07) Frisco
O$) Frisco, Unincorporated
09) Heeney, Lower Blue
10) Keystone, Snake River area,
Summit Cove
11) Silverthorne
12) Silverthorne, Unincorporated
13) Not within Summit County (specify):
,~
-6-
31. llo you prefer to: (CHECK ONE ONLY)
1) ( ] Own
2) [ ] Rent
3) [ ] Lease with option to buy
32. What amenities are most important in your
housing choice? Please rank those items
which influence your housing choice using 1
through 5 with 1 as "Most Important," 2 as
"2nd." 3 as "3rd." 4 as "4th ," and 5 as
"5th Most Important." Rank your top five
only. Use each number once only.
O1) Ability to have pets
02) Dishwasher/disposal
03)' Laundry facilities
04) Location
05) On-site daycare
06) Parking nearby
07) Privacy
08) Private deck/patio space
09) Proximity to athletic facilities:
Which ones:
10)` Proximity to employment
11) Proximity to skiing
12) Rental/guest rooms (available for
visitors)
13) Storage
14) Usable yard area
15) Woodstove
33. If "affordable/employee" housing were
provided in an acceptable location, would
you rent or purchase a residence'?
(CHECK ONE ONLY)
1) [ ] Yes - rent an employee residence
2) ( ] Yes - purchase an employee residence
3) [ ] No -neither rent or purchase an
employee residence
4) [ ] Uncertain
34. Would you live in housing owned by and/or
managed by your employer?
1) [ ] Yes
2) [ J No
3) [ ] Uncertain
35. If you intend to stay in the region, do you
intend to purchase housing within the next
24 monihs?
1) [ 1 Yes
2) [ ] No
3) [ ) Uncertain
-7-
Finally, a few more questions to assist in
classifying your responses.
36. What is your sex?
1) [ ] Male
2) [ ] Female
37. tVhat is your age?
years old
38. Which of these categories best describes
your marital status?
1) [ J Single (never married)
2) [ J Married
3) [ J Living together
4) [ J Separated
5) [ J Divorced
6) [ J Widowed
39. tVhat was the last level of school you
completed?
1) [ ) Jr. high or less
2) [ J Some high school
3) [ J High school graduate
4) [ ] Some college
5) [ ] College graduate
G) [ ) Some post graduate
7) [ ] Post graduate degree
40. What is your primary source of income?
(CHECK UNE ONLY)
O1) [ ] Ski Corporation
02) [ ] Bar/restaurant
03) [ ) Retail
04) [ ] Government
05) [ J Lodging
06) [ J Finance
- 07) [ ] Construction
08) [ ] Professional
09) [ 1 Real estate/property management
lU) [ ] Service
il) f ] Retired
12) [ J Education
13) ( 1 Other:
40a. What is your secondary source of
income, if applicable?
(INSERT # FROM Q. 40 ABOVE)
OR [ ] Not applicable, no secondary source
-8-
+1. ,rnat is your employee classification?
1) [ J Sales
2) [ ] Service
3) [ ] Professional
4) [ ] Management
5) [ ] Clerical
G) [ ) Skilled Labor (Craft or Trade)
7) [ ] Unskilled Labor
8) [ ] Other - specify:
42. }iow long have you worked Yor your current
employer?
1) [ ] 0 - 6 months
2) [ ] 6 months - 1 year
3) [ ] 1 - 3 years
4) [ ] 3 - 5 years
5 ) [ ] , 5 - 10 years
6) [ 1 Over 10 years
43. What is the location of your primary job?
O1) [ ] Blue River
02) [ J Breckenridge
03) [ ] Upper Blue, Unincorporated
04) [ ] Copper Mountain
05) ( ) Dillon
06) [ ] Dillon, Unincorporated
07) ( ] Frisco
08) [ ] Frisco, Unincorporated
09) [ 1 Heeney, Lower Blue
10) [ ~ Keystone, Snake River area, Summit Cove
11) [ ] Silverthorne
12) [ ] Silverthorne, Unincorporated
13) [ ] Other:
44. How many '.lobs did you work last:
a. Winter jobs
b. Summer jobs
44a. }iow many hours per week di~i you
work on average in winter?
44b. How many months per year do you
work?
45a. What was your total annual household income
for 1988 before taxes? (ESTIMATE SE{OULD
INCLUDE ALL RESIDENTS OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD)
S
/ per year before taxes
HUUSEHOLD
45b. What is your individual annual income for
1988 before taxes?
S / per year before taxes
INDIVI}IUAL
-9-
46. Have you had any housing problems since
moving to Summit County? If so, what are
they?
47. There iris been a lot of discussion about the
housing situation iu Summit County for
employees of local business. Ilow do you
feel about it?
1) [ ] I believe it is the roost critical
problem we have in this County.
2) [ ] I believe employee housing is one
of the more serious problems.
3) [ ] It is a problem, but we have many
others which also need solutions.
4) [ ] It is one of our lesser problems.
5) [ 1 I don't think it is a problem.
Comments:
48. What would be the most important thing the
Town, County, or private sector could do Lo
improve the trousin~ situation in the region?
49. (IF PREFER TO OWN) If you prefer to own,
how much can you and your partners afford as
a down payment?
1) [ ] $ o - 4,999 4) [ ] $15,000 - 19,9ss
2) [ ) $ 5,000 - 9,999 5) [ ) $20,000 or more
3) [ ] $10,000 - 14,999
50a. (IF PREFER TO OWN) If you prefer to owtr,
how much can you and/or your partners afford
for a monthly mortgage payment? (principle
and interest, nvt including utilities). If
married or living together, please state the
total amount available by you and your
spouse together.
0) [ ] $ 0 - 399 6) [ J $1,400 - 1,599
1) [ ] $ 400 - 599 7) [ ] $1,600 - 1,799
2) [ ] s soo = 79s s} [ ] $1,800 - 1,999
3) [ ] $ 800 - 999 9) [ ] $2,000 or more
4) [ ] $1,000 - 1,199
5) [ ] $1,200 - 1,399
50b. (IF PREFER TO RENT) What can you afford to
pay for rent (excluding utilities)?
0) [ ] $ 0 - 99 6) [ ] $ 600 - 699 '
1) ( ] $ 100 - 199 7) [ ] $ 700 - 999
2) [ ] $ 200 - 299 8) [ ] $1,000 - 1,4ss
3) ( ] $ 300 - 399 9) [ ] $1,500 or more
4) [ ] $ 400 - 499
5) [ ] $ 500 - 599
Thank you very much for your participation. "~
-10-
.Summit County Association of REALTORS
REALTOR FO. Box 53~ / Crisco, Colorado 804~i3
(3G3) 0,~~-3024
REALTOR E~dPLOYEE HO1951QdG S(~RVEY
In case you haven't heard (!) , the County is concerned about an inadequacy
of housing for employees, during the peak season.
Please take the time to respond to the following questions drafted b~ your Realtor
Committee on Housing Issues:
~e need your Help!
Yes = 26 ° Should the Realtor organization encourage Town and County
No = 16 officials to relax zoning and development procedures to facilitate
employee housing projects? [ ] Yes - [ j No
Yes = 29 ° Would you, as a Realtor member and one active in the real
No = 13 estate industry, support giving breaks to certain employee housing
projects? Don't know = 1 [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Yes = 6 ° Would you support such projects if it meant that such leniency
No = 36 might establish a long-range precedent which might adversely impact
property values? [ ) Yes - [ ] No
Yes = 29 ° Do you feel that there is a crisis in Summit County regarding the
No =
13
availability of seasonal employee housing for rent, that requires ,
'
emergency response by County officials? [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Yes = 33 ° Would your clients and customers be discouraged from investing
No = 5 in vacant land if the planning rec3ulations were enforced in an
inconsistent manner? Don't know = 2 [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Yes = 23 ° Do you feel that employers have a primary responsibility to insure
No = 14 that there is appropriate housing for their seasonal requirements when
they start operation? Don't know = 2 [ ] Yes - [ J No
Yes = 14 ° Do you fell that there is enough land in Summit County presently
No = 17 zoned for employee housing projects? [ ] Yes - ( ] No
Don' t Know - 2 In Breckenridge? 4 Ys/8 Nn in Dillon? 4 Ys/8 NO
In Frisco? 6 Ys/5 NO In Silverthorne? 12 Ys/1 No
Yes = 20 ° Would you encourage officials to change master planning or
No = ?0 planning procedures to accomodate certain employee housing requests
by granting concessions to developers? [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Yes
No = = 34
5 ° Would variances through established development processes with
public hearings be appropriate to accomodate employee housing
projects? [ ] Yes - [ ) No
Yes = 39 ° Do you feel that public officials need to be consi,tent with
No = 3 existing development regulations and current zoning in order to
maintain market v21ue of real est::te? Don't know = 3 [ ] Yes - [ ] No
The following are some ways that have been discussed to provide employee housing.
Please indicate yes or no as to whether or not the Realtor Association should support
them:
'es = 15 1. Relax planning process to facilitate a project which would provide
'o = 25 employee housing [ ] Yes - [ ) No
's = 20 2. Change zoning which would increase density to provide greater
~ = 19 incentives to developer Maybe = 1 [ ) Yes - [ ] No
•s = 24 3. Waiving of certain development fees, i.e, water and sewer tap
= 17 fees, by town officials [ ] Yes - [ ] No
(over)
~e Voice for Real EstateT~A in Summit Count "~
v ,.~.. ~~~..~
~~~ SORVSY Draft 11
. saoaar covNrY 1/9/90
~xDAars aovszNO ~s Asssss~arr saxvsr
This survey 1s being done as part of the analysis of housing
issues in Summit County. As a representative of the business
sector, your response to these questions will help us
understand the nature of the situation and possible solutions.
Please answer the first eight questions. Zf you have time, we
would appreciate your response on the remaining questions as
well.
thank you for your assistance.
1. Name of business (optional):
?. Business Iocatlon:
Phone t:
3. Type of business:
4. Size of space occupied by your business: sq. ft.
4a. If lodging, number of rooms/units:
S. Number of employees: ~~\\
Full time: t
Permanent ~.~~,V.;~~~,-/~ ` `.
Seasonal
total
Part-time: ~t1
Permanent
Seasonal ~~'
total ~
~7 ~
Of the seasonal employees listed above, how many ~
returned from previous years this winter?
6. Nov many employees did you offer positions to
this year that were unable to take the position because
they couldn't find housing?
Please explain:
7. Does your business offer housing for your employees?
2) ( ) Yes
?) ( ) No
7a. (IF YES):
How many employees do you houseT
7b. (IF YES) What type is provided?
1
'7c. [IF YES) What is the monthly rent?
8. In your opinion, rank to order the reasons employees
leave your business, with "1" - Host Important, "2" -
Second Host Important, and "3" - Third Nost Important.
(CHOOSE 3 ONLY. USE EACH NUNBER ONCE ONLY,)
Desire for change Sn living environment
Disparity bet wean wages and cost of housing
Growth and change In the town q/
Lack of adequate employment ~~>~'
Lack of adequate housing .~~~y'~
Lack of professlonel opportunity
Location of family/friends
Return to school
Too expensive
Other:
9. Overall, how would you rate your experience in finding
employees this past year?
DIFFI- VERY
CULT EASY
a. Winter 1989-90 I 2 3 4 5
b. Summer 1989 1 2 3 9 S
c. Winter 2988-89 1 ? 3 4 5
20. In general, how would you rate your experience finding
employees this winter season?
2) [ J Huch more difficult than in past years
?) [ J Nore difficult than in past years
3) [ J The same as in past years
4J ( J Easier than in past years
5) ( J Nuch easier than In past years
lI. Do yo clos for off-season?
Spring: ) [ J Yes ?) ( J No
Fall: I) ( J Yes 21 ( ) No
1Ia. (IF YES) Do the same employees return after off-season?
1) (J Yes
2) [ J No
I?. Describe your recruitment efforts In the past year
(advertising, visits Co other locations, incentives
offered, etc.).
2
13. Nov many of your employees (permanent/seasonal) need/use
day care?
Employees
Do you~s6bsidize their expenses?
1) [ J Yes
2) ( ) No
Do you help them obtain it?
I) [) Yes
?J [ 1 No
l~. Do you provide a ski pass to your employees?
1) [ 1 Yes
?J f 1 No
What percentage of the total pass price do you
pay?
IS. What should the government do, if anything, to provide or
encourage the provision of affordable housing?
16. What should the private sector do, if anything, to
provide or encourage the provision of affordable housing?
I~tXIC YOV POR YOCR SIJDi, IDEAS AND COJlOINTS.
~1r~~k ~~
\ I~^ (~~.
3
SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY
Total Units
3500
3000
2500
cn
~_
z 2000
J
Q
~ 1500
0
1000
500
0
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Breck Un inc D illn Un inc Frsco Un inc Mtzma
BIRvr S'thn Tenmi SnRvr Uninc
SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY
Total Units-By Type
3500
3000
2500
cn
~_
z 2000
Q
~
0 1500
~-
1000
500
0
Breck Uninc Dilln Uninc Frsco Uninc Mtzma
BIRvr S'thn Tenmi SnRvr
Uninc
1ST-OWN
1ST-RENT
2ND HOMES
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
SUMMIT COUNTY HOUSING INVENTORY
Total Units-1st Homes by Type
z
Q
~--
0
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Breck Un inc D illn Un inc Frsco Un inc Mtzma
BIRvr S'thn Tenm i SnRvr
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Uninc
OWNERS
RENTERS
.. .,
a
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION
OF
SYI~HONY OF SPORTS PROGRAM
A g e n d a
for Vail Town Council meeting
Tuesday, December 19, 1989
1. Description of Symphony of Sports 1989; highlighting major
similarities and changes for Symphony of Sports presentation
for 1990
2. The benefits of the production of Symphony of Sports for the
Vail Valley
3. Budget and Funding for Symphony of Sports
4. Questions and Discussion
SYMPHONY OF SPORTS
1989 and 1990
WHAT IS SYMPHONY OF SPORTS?
Symphony of Sports (SOS) is a new concept in
entertainment. In its 1989 debut presentation in Vail,
the two athletic entities of gymnastics and figure
skating were combined in an artistic presentation for the
first time. The combination of music, grace, and
athletic prowess culminated in a magnificent presentation
that was enjoyed by the local Vail community and viewed
by an estimated 109, 822, 830 people by way of the ABC Wide
World of Sports television special and various other
media presentations.
The 1989 Symphony of Sports event included ten various
sports clinics sponsored by the Women's Sports
Foundation. Each clinic featured a prominent female
athlete who demonstrated and instructed in their areas
of expertise. This aspect of SOS will not be included
in the 1990 event.
THE PERFORMERS -
In the 1989 presentation, we were honored to witness the
world class performances of:
Bart Conner Peter Vidmar Scott Johnson
Rristi Phillips Marcia Fredricks Rosalynn Summers
Brian Boitano Peggy Flemming Robin Cousins
This coming year we expect to have all of these
exceptional athletes return to Vail and we hope to add:
Raterina Witt - 1988 Women's 1988 Olympic Champion
DATES: (NOTE: There will be 3 performances in 1990 in contrast to
only one presentation in 1989)
The 1989 event was held in the end of April. Even though
this is not a priority visitor/tourist time of year, the
program was supported by the local community with fervor.
With the obvious difficulties of producing this event in
Vail's active month of March, there are also many more
positive aspects associated with a March presentation.
ABC filming the Symphony of Sports in March will enable
the network to present the program nationally on May 12,
1990. This date has a significantly higher viewer
population than the June airing of 1989's performance.
(2)
An additional benefit of a March presentation is that we
will be able to showcase Vail at its peak; Not only will
panarama views of Vail in March be showcased but, we
will also be able to insert film footage of Summer in
Vail.
The 1990 dates for Symphony of Sports will be:
Arrival, Set Up and Rehearsal
Monday, March 12 - Friday, March 16
Performances:
Dress Rehearsal Friday, March 16, 1990
First Show Saturday, March 17, 1990
Second Show Sunday, March 18, 1990
(3)
1989 CARESS SYMPHONY OF SPORTS PROGRAM EVALUATION
The following evaluates both the quantitative and qualitative
results of the Symphony of Sports public relations benefits.
This information is based on 90g of the data available in reference
to the 1989 Caress Symphony of Sports.
The program resulted in a viewer population of
109,822,830 impressions (viewers).
Publicity and Presentations before and after the event were made
through the following media:
- ABC-TV Network Wide World Of Sports Presentation
- Public Vail Presentation
- Signage
- Frank Gifford announcements
- Athlete interviews
- Airline movie presentations
- Satellite Television Media Tour
- National Television Presentation with spokespersons to
be on national programs: Good Morning America, Regis,
Entertainment Tonight, CNN Show Biz Tonight, and Hour
Magazine.
- International Viewing - 7 Countries
- American Airlines, and Japan Airlines movie presentations
- Radio.- an advertising radio tape to expected to reach
approximately 2.6 million listeners.
- Magazine advertising (anticipated circulation 25 Million)
- Newspaper advertising anticipated to appear. in 25 million
issues; 350 of the largest daily papers.
AN INCREASE IN MEDIA PRESENTATION FOR 1990
A total increase viewership/circulation is anticipated to be 124.2
million for the 1990 presentation. (An approximate 15 million
viewer increase over 1989.)
SYMPHONY OF SPORTS BUDGET
1989 1990
INCOME
Gate Receipts $ 13,315.00 $ 63,000 (see below)
Town of Vail contribution $ 16,500 $ 25,000
TICKET REVENUE
Dress Rehearsal (650 @ $20) $ 13,000
1st Show (1,000 @ $2S) $ 2S 000
2nd Show (1,000 @ $ZS) $ 25,000
Total Ticket Revenue $ 63,000
TOTAL INCOME $ 29,815 $ 88,000
EXPENSES
LODGING ........................................ $ 0.00 $ 27,000
FOOD .............................................. $13,986.71 $ 14,000
(2 banquets)
TRANSPORTATION ......................... $ 2,047.21 $ 3,100
(Denver to Vail, local)
PRINTING ..................................... $ 1,729.31 $ 2,000
(tickets, posters)
ADVERTISING ............................... $ 4,523.50 $ 5,000
(local only)
SALARY ........................................ $ 1,068.30 $ 2,400
(2 assts. 2 wks. prior)
DECORATIONS ................................ $ 1,869.92
VOLUNTEERS ................................. $ 1,347.96 $ 1,500
OPERATING .................................... $ 678.97 $ 1,500
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE........... $ 27,251.88 $ 56,500
CONTRACTOR FEES (50% of gate).... $ 6,657.50 $ 31,500
TOTAL EVENT BUDGET $ 33,909.38 $ 88,000
NET INCOME (loss)........ ($ 4,094.38) $ even
NOTE; THIS BUDGET DOES NOT INCLUDE THESE ESTIMATED INDIRECT COSTS TO VMRD
Dobson Arena; Stafj time, foregone revenue $ 16,000
( 8 days at $ 2,000 p/day )
VMRD; Staff time, office support $ 10,000
$ 26,000
.,,
~owo of uai
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2116
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Phillips
Vail Town Council
FROM: Greg Hall
~~~~
DATE: January 11, 1990
RE.: Additional Positions in Engineering Division
In years past, the Town of Vail budget was comprised primarily of
operating and debt service expenses with a small amount of capital
projects. In contrast, the 1990 budget includes over $5 million
of capital projects as well as planning and design for several
million dollars in future projects. The Town's attempts to manage
this growing capital project load without increasing professional
staff has resulted in excessive consultant costs and numerous
project delays. The proposed addition of a Town of Vail survey
crew in order to solve these problems represents a recognition of
the new reality of a large and growing capital project component
within the Town's budget.
The 1990 Heavy Equipment Fund budget, approved .this last fall,
contains three new positions to be added to the Town staff. During
the approval process, the Council requested some additional back-up
information to be presented prior to recruiting for these
positions. The positions are a Town Surveyor, Construction
Inspector/Design Technician, and a Drafter. In addition to these
full-time positions, a seasonal surveying assistant would be hired
during the summer months.
The creation of the requested positions allows the Town to perform
in-house many of the tasks currently contracted out to private
engineering firms. The cost of these engineering and survey
contracts is currently budgeted within the various capital projects
which are approved each year. Under the proposed new system, the
full costs of the additional employees will be charged out to
capital projects in place of some of the private contracts.
The full annualized cost (after spreading initial capital costs
over a number of years and including estimated liability insurance)
of the proposed survey crew is approximately $160,000. As shown
in the graph below, the hiring of an in-house crew should produce
substantial cost savings on the Town's capital projects.
EXISTING METHODOLOGY:
YEAR ALL SERVICES CONTRACTED
1989 $201,781
1990 $430,475
$159,273
$261,031
$ 42,508
$169,444
In addition to being cost effective, the new Town survey crew
should also provide the: Town with the following important new
services:
o Mapping of Town property lines, streets, utilities, etc.
o Design drafting
o More timely project surveys
o Additional construction inspection
o Plat checks .and verification
o Town property management and inventory
As requested by the Council, staff has checked the price of having
survey services provided on an annual contract basis by a local
firm. The resulting bid would have provided only about one-half
of the needed services at a cost higher than the full annualized
cost of the Town's in-house crew. This option is clearly not
desirable.
A thorough analysis of this matter leads me to the conclusion that
the Town of Vail will recognize both substantial cost savings and
improved services by hiring its own survey crew. I look forward
to discussing the issue in detail with Town Council next Tuesday.
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY:
BOTH IN-HOUSE AND
CONTRACTED SERVICES SAVINGS
A
1989 BUDGET
PROJECT (IN MILLIONSI
POTATO PATCH 51.300
STREETS
EAST VAIL 50.205
BIKE PATH
EAST VAIL SO.liS
BRIDGE
TOWN AERIALS 50.035
MEADOW DRIVE
AMPHITHEATER
GOLDEN PEAK
BUS WASH 80.309
BOOTHS FALLS 50.350
DITCH
PULIS BRIDGE
GORE CREEK BRIDGE
PARKING STRUCTURE
TECHNICAL
SPECIALISTS
f23,300,
43,000
i
~i
46,940
531,500
!11,600
543,000
EYISTING METHODOLOGY OF
CONTRACTING SERVICES
SURVEYING DESIGN
552,970 592,000
511,103 510,313
(2,600 51,860
53,500
55,500
51,200
51,000 f4,000
57,000
53,000
51,700
58,000
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
525,400
i
f6,8751
55,0601
f7,S00~
STREAMWALK 50.1501 ( f1,200
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING flOTH
IN-HOUSE AND CONTRACTED SERVICES
SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
591,477 532,887 519,890
48,699 58,075 55,383
52,036 51,860 53,962
52,791
54,307
5940
5783 59,000
55,481
45,873
52,349
51,331
56,264
5940
TOTALS .52.535 (119,340 (98,773 458,173 544,835 577,343 546,822
GRAND TOTAL 5119,340 4201,781 5159,273
SAVINGS PROVIDED BY USING IN-HOUSE TOWN SERVICES (201,781 - 4159,27s s 542,508
435,108
r
1990 BUDGET- ECHNICAL
PROJECT (IN MILLIONS) PECIALISTS
GORE CREEK 50.030 4300
PROMENADE
MILL CREEK 40.015 5150
LANDSCAPING
SKI MUSEUM (0.010 4100
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
VILLAGE 40.500 510,000
IMPROVEMENT DIST
MASTER TRANS. 50.080 560,000
PLAN
LANDSCAPING 40.190 495D
SIDEVALK SO.O1S 575
IMPROVEMENTS
POST OFFICE f0.?00 563,000
REMODEL/PARKING
LOT
HUS SHELTER 40.030
IMPROVEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN 41.200 475,000
OVERPASS
SNO1,i DUMP 40.100 41,000
SITE
PATHS 50.070 41,050
MAINTENANCE
INTERMOUNTAIN f1.100 529,700
STREETS
BIKE PATH BRIDGE 40.090 46,320
EAST VAI6 ~
'EXISTING METHODOLOGY OF
CONTRACTING SERVICES
SURVEYING DESIGN
f1,500
4750
f50D
f8,7S0
(4,000
59,500
4688
(1,750
f600
57,500
f5,D00
51,300
438,800
Sa,eoo
5540
5270
5180
417,500
512,000
53,420
5575
428,000
54,000
82,000
f84,100
43,500
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT ~I
52,SOD
51,750
525,000
54,200
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING HOTH
IN-HOUSE AHD CONTRACTED SERVICES
SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
51,127 5170
5563 589
5376 556
56,573 517,500
S4,OD0 512,000
57,137 51,063
S5t7 5179
51,315
5471
55,634 528,000
53,756 51,243 5350
5977 5621 5250
529,148 519,914 53,400
S1,9S3 53,500 5575
1990 PROJECTS BUDGET TECHNICAL
CONT. (IN MILLIONS SPECYALISTS
RECREATION 50.168 41,500
TRAILS
DONOVAN PARK 50.550 512,000
STEVENS PARK 50.030 51,500
AMPHITHEATER 50.045 51,100
GOLDEN PEAK
PARKING SO.11S 52,500
STRUCTURE
ROADWAYS
~EZISTING METHODOLOGY OF
'CONTRACTING SERVICES
SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
f7,56D 59,240 69,200
527,500 59,900
S1,S00 5590
51,200 52,475 5800
53,162 56,325 52,875',
(PROPOSED METHODOLOGY OF PROVIDING BOTH
iIN-HOUSE AND CONTRACTED SERVICES
'SURVEYING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
55,679 52,871 5575
520,659 33,076
51,127 5168
5901 5769 5130
52,375 56,325 52,875
PULIS BRIDGE 50.215 515,020 54,300 S3,OD0 510,750 53,23D 53,000 51,968
GORE CREEK 50.165 54,200 53,300 52,$25 58,250 52,479 52,625 51,130
BRIDGE
WILLOW BRIDGE 40.350 421,200 59,200 59,200 53,155 S4,2D0
MEADOW DRIVE SO.S00 51,000 516,000 416,000
DOWD JUNCTION 50.600 532,200 518,000 f7,800 518,D00 513,322 47,800 52,460
BIKE PATH ,
TOTALS , f$.868 5339,865 6153,960 5198,190 578,325 5116,679 4131,164 513,193
GRAND TOTAL 5339,865 5430,475
c ,
SAVINGS PROVIDED BY USING Ik-HOUSE TOWN SERVICES 5490,475 - 5261,031 a 41$9,444
HOWEVER, NEED TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL ENGINEER TO ACCOMPLISH DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WORK AT S50,ODD
5169,444 (EZPECTED SAVINGS) - 430,000 s 5119,444