Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-03-27 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessioni _-Y,~,C~-~ ~_ UAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 1990 12:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Affordable Housing Focus Interview with Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission 2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 3. Design Review Board Report 4. Discussion of Capital Projects Priorities 5. Review of Draft Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1990, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.32 of Title 8 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to expand, strengthen, and clarify Code provisions relating to smoking in public places and places of employment. 6. information Update 7. Other VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 1990 12:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 12:00 2:00 Kristan Pritz 2:05 Mike Mollica 1. Affordable Housing Focus Interview with Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission Action Requested of Council: Discuss various alternatives for encouraging affordable housing within Vail. 2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 3. Design Review Board Report 2:10 4. Discussion of Capital Projects Priorities Steve Barwick Action Requested of Council: Finalize priorities for 1990 capital projects. Background Rationale: Staff will present a recommended list of capital projects for 1990. These projects are to be funded from both the Capital Projects Fund and the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund. 3:10 5. Review of Draft No Smoking Ordinance Susan Scanlan Larry Eskwith Action Requested of Council: Discuss changes to the Kristan Pritz ordinance. 3:35 6. Information Update Ron Phillips 3:40 7. Other town 0 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303)479-2138 (303)479-2139 MEMORANDUM office of community development T0: Vail Town Council and Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: .Community Development Department DATE: March 27, 1990 SUBJECT: Preliminary Alternatives for Town of Vail affordable Housing. The consultant and planning staff have meet with employers, developers, and employees to discuss the preliminary concepts out- lined in the attached memo. The memo is only a draft document. The primary purpose of the list of alternatives is to stimulate discussion at the joint work session. Comments from the council and planning commission as well as developers, employers and employees will then be compiled and used to refine the alternatives. Additional ideas brought up in the focus groups will also be added to the list of alternatives. At Tuesdays joint work session, the consultant and planning staff will led a focus group which will allow ,council members and commissioners to view their personal opinions on the alternatives. ROSALI REMMEN CARES [ c PC T e :: ~ ~ E < _ T _ E _ . ___.c_ _ REGULATION ALTERNATIVES: TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS L ~ts for employers and residential developers to set aside units for low d/or moderate income residents/employees. A -Eligibility Residential developers of 5 or more units need to allocate at least 20 percent of their units to low or moderate income employees for rent only. visions: • Can be on-site i~uorporated as part of development Plan or off-site, if approved by Town of Vail PEC and/or Town Council. If off-site, specifics, site plan and approval of Eagle County or applicable local j~~ diction must be received and documented prior to issuance. of any b ding permits. • Must be newly constructed units; cannot be met by "reserving long term rental units" out of existing housing stock, unless exceptional dreumstances „ „ warrant variance due to hardship or documented period of excess supply of units existing (criteria to be established). • In establishing number of units required, applicant rounds to nearest whole number if units will be constructed, i.e. 5-7 units require 1 affordable unit, 8-12 units require 2 affordable units, etc. • Applicant can elect to pa to Town of Vail Housing Authority (or other assigned entity) a fee in lieu of construction of said affordable housing. The fee would be deposited into an account allocated exclusively for provision of low/moderate income housing by Town of Vail. Fee will be calculated on the basis of 525,000 per unit, with fractional units calculated. • Town of Vail will define maximum rent levels which can be charged for each unit (variation by size of unit, ~ of bedrooms, etc.) based upon formula related to median income, adjusted annually. Developer must agree to maintain designated units under "affordable housing rnteria control" thmugh covenants which will remain in force for a minimum of Years. • Once constructed, units can be "transferred" to other locations upon approval of Town of Vail, i.e. a unit constructed at one location may be converted to market rent or short termed if at least a comparable quality unit is provided at an alternate location either within the development or off the site. ~i N ARES u ~ 1 -~ ti--~ ' ROSALL REMME C • The provision applies to all qualifying developments. No variances or waivers are available. Town may enact a provision which sets up a criterion such as a documentable vacancy rate to affordable housing units of 10 percent or greater, on an annual basis, that applicant can defer construction of units until such time as vacancy rate dips below 10 percent, at -which time units are required to be constructed. This provision, if elected by developer, will be treated as a developer or subdivision aggrreement, with a formal bond or acceptable letter of aedit deposited, subject to call by Town of Vail. II. Requirements of "employers" who wish to construct new square .footage dther through expansion of existing facilities or through free standing, independent structures, to set aside/construct low and/or moderate income "employee" housing which represents at least 20 percent of the direct employment generated by the development. Provisions: • Can be on-site or off-site, same as Residential Development requirements. • Can utilize in lieu of payment, same as Residential Development. • Requirement applies only to amount of new construction approved; cannot be retroactively applied to portions of development already constructed. • Renovation of existing square footage does not require new affordable housing; only increase in gross square footage or new "independent" construction applies. • Criteria for office and retaff square footage, lodging and resort/recreational facilities will be developed to calculate the minimum new employee defuution For example: - Office -one per 350 square feet - Retail -one per 300 square feet - Lodging -one per three rooms - Resort - if fadlities such as restaurant, administrative, etc. utilize above criteria. If expansion on mountain, Le. new lifts and trails, then special calculation to be considered through negotiation as part of approval process. • Employers can provide "for-rent housing only" which they will manage and control New housing, not control of existing units. 2 ROSALL REMMEN CARES Criteria will be utilized to relate numbers of employees to number of bedrooms provided, i.e. 1.2 employees per bedroom in standard units, 2 employees per bedroom in dormitory/group housing facilities. As with residential development requirements, during periods of above 10°6 vacancy rates, deferral of obligations combined with bonding requirements subject to "call" by Town is permitted. • Criteria will be established to describe the threshold of commercial expansion/new construction which will trigger the employee housing requirement. One possibility is any expansion in excess of 5 percent of the existing square footage or any new facility of 2500 square feet or greater. III. Special provisions to be made available as part of the SDD to anyone seeking increases in density or expansion of uses permitted by right.. These provisions apply only in zones where SDD are also permitted. The purpose of this section is to encourage, within reasonable standards and parameters, the production of affordable employee housing units in excess of the 20 percent required of .all development above a certain threshold size. Provisions: Incorporate in 18.40.050 - Submittal Requirements: 13) A plan which describes the method by which the applicant will meet the overall housing needs of the employees being generated by the development. Incorporated into this document is a description of the number and classification of seasonal and year-round employees projected by season, by year. Applicant will state what specific commitments are being made either through on- and/or off-site construction to house employees in excess of the standard ZO percent normally required. • Insert a new section after 18.40.090 - Increase in density beyond that permitted 'by right" m the underlvine zone. There are two types of developments envisioned related to this section. One entails an employee housing project, exclusively, which is located m either a residential or a commercial zone. The second involves amixed- use or commercial-oriented development, typically located in an underlying commercial area. With regard to the first example, the employee housing development, we would suggest the following: 3 _, ROSALL REMMEN CARES So song as the design criteria defined in 18.40.080 and the criteria (perhaps refined) related to benefit to the Town outweighing adverse impacts contained within 18.40.090 can be demonstrated to have been met, maximum density increase beyond that normally permitted in the underlying zoning shall be defined. One of the criteria to be utilized in that derision is the affordable housing plan committed as part of the development. Each ear the Town would formally ado tan affordable housing policy which establishes a prioritization of affordable housing needs for the community. For example, the Town might initially state that housing facilities for "single" seasonal employees represents the most critical need in the community, with rental housing for middle income families (2-3 bedrooms), employed on a year-mund basis as the second priority. Rental levels of $250 per month per person for seasonal employees and $600-$750 per month for 2-3 bedroom family housing might be established as part of that policy. The housing plan submitted as part of the SDD application for the employee housing project would be reviewed in the context of the pertinent housing policy. Based upon the quality of the application, including review of all aspects of the design and affordable housing criteria, as well as the applicable Land Use Plan standards, the applicant would be eligible to receive an increase in GRFA and/or number of dwelling units of up to 25 percent beyond that which is permitted within the underlying zoning. In the instance of an SDD application involving amixed-use or a commercial pmject in order for any increase in density beyond. that permitted by the underlying zoning to be approved, a corresponding finding that the applicant is complying with the "targeted" affordable housing plan in a manner which is eater than normally required must be made by the approving board. As in the case of all SDD applications, the overall design criteria and other related criteria for approval must be met in addition to the new affordable housing plan component. It is recognized that certain areas of the Town such as portions of Vail Village do not allow additional increases in density beyond that permitted by the underlying zoning. The requirements of these particular areas shall not be modified by this provision. 4 ROSALL REMMEN CARES IV. Caretaker Units Provisions: • Allowed in single-family, primary/secondary, duplex and hillside residential zone districts. • 500 s.f. maximum, including kitchen. • One parking space paved. • ~ence must beowner-occupied. ~ ~'~ N"~~ '1 • Occupancy of accessory unit must not exceed two people. • The property must meet all zoning standards for parking, landscaping, minimum lot size, etc. • Accessory unit must be located within the existing unit. Minor conversions on the exterior are allowed as long as all zoning standards are met. Setback variances and height variances discouraged. • Accessory unit is incidental to primary use of property as a single or duplex residence. • Notice shall be given to adjacent property. owners. • Accessory unit may not be subdivided or sold separately. Unit may not be short-term rented. • Accessory unit is permanently designated as a long-term rental to local (see enclosed section on employee-restncted units from zoning code). • Accessory unit agreement is signed by owner and TOV. Agreement is recorded as County. • Process for review is similar to a home occupation permit or perhaps conditional use permit. Additional Provisions: • The community development department shall find that the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property th the area in which the subject property is situated. • No variances for setbacks, height, parking, site coverage or landscaping, site development or gross residential floor area would be approved unless 5 ROSALL REMMEN CARES the granting of such a variance benefits the visual appearance of the site and surrounding area. • The architectural design of the structure and the materials and colors must be visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and structures, and must not unnecessarily block scenic views from existing buildings. • Access to the secondary unit must not adversely affect the privacy of adjacent structures. • The applicant must demonstrate that the site has the ability to double its capacity for handling trash and outdoor storage. • An application for the second unit, containing the following information, must be submitted to the community development department for their review. - Name of applicant and address - Name of applicant's representative (if any) - Authorization of property owner - Location of the property for which the proposal is made - A .fee of $100 plus an amount equal to the then-current first lass postage rate for each property owner to be notified hereunder - A list of the names of the owners of all property adjacent to the subject property and their addresses for the purpose of notification. • The proposed plan and all required materials must be submitted to the design review board at their regularly scheduled meeting for their review and approval. • The applicant shall agree in writing: - That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold, transferred or conveyed separately from the primary unit for a period of not more ~~~~~~ than 20 years and the lift of Trent Ruder from the date that the certificate of occupancy is issued for said second unit. - That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be leased or rented for any period of less than 30 consecutive days, and that if it shall be rented it shall be rented only to tenant who are full-time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be deemed to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Qiff, Gilman, Eagle-Vail and Avon and their surrounding areas. A full-time employee is a person who works an average of 30 hours per week. 6 ROSALL REMMEN CARES That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be divided into any form of time-shares, interval ownership or fractional fee. - That a declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be filed of record in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to ensure that the restrictions herein shall run with the land. A - An appeal to the planning commission from a decision of the community development department may be made by the applicant, adjacent property owners, or the Town manager. The planning commission can also call up such decisions by a majority vote of those commission members present. B -For all appeals, the appeal must be Sled in writing within 10 days following the decision or the derision must be called up by the planning commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting. C • The planning commission shall hear the appeal within 30 days of its being filed or called up, with a possible 30-day extension if the commission Suds that there is insufficient information. D -The decision of the community development department shall become final after the time for such an appeal or call-up is exhausted within any formal appeal V. Town of Vail Demonstration Housing Project. Support has been expressed by several focus group partiespants that, in addition to amendments in the Zoning Code such as those outlined above, the Town should move forward with a demonstration project involving public/private cooperation. This program would involve the Town either utilizing an appropriate site which it currently owns or acquiring a new site for the purpose of constructing an employee housing pmject targeted primarily for seasonal residents. Under this concept, the Town would be responsible for designing and constructing the project. It would "pre-sell" the units to local businesses and companies on some criteria. Those businesses would then utilize the units they purchase for housing eligible employees in need. The Town itself could also be a buyer of a certain number of the units. In effect, the Town would be the agent. responsible for putting the project together, with the costs shared by the participating businesses. Various alternatives could be utilized for ongoing management responsibilities. Covenants would be written to ensure long-term compliance with affordable housing restrictions. 7 't ROSALL REMMEN CARES The Town, through creation of a Housing Authority, could borrow money at below private market interest rates, with revenues guaranteed by the project participants, or other funding mechanisms could be established. As one alternative, the Town could sell the units at a slight profit over actual cost, with the additional funds being allocated to the Housing Trust Fund for future use. If this project proves to be successful, it could be repeated on another site. Various sites to be considered for the study have been discussed, and they include: Ulbrich property Mountain Bell tract Spraddle Creek, Parcel B Vail Heights Donovan's Park area Old Town Shops site Parcel H at Big Horn Big Horn sanitation site Katsos Ranch Tract "D" by Texaco North`'~ofAspen Tree, east of Sandstone Park VI. Revision of minunum development standards for dedicated employee housing units. Discussion has been held regarding the potential of establishing certain development standards or density calculations which would pertain only to dedicated employee housing units. This is a potentially difficult azea insofar as the need would be to maintain acceptable standards of quality and neighborhood compatibility, while at the same time recognizing unique needs of employee projects. In the event special standards were to be approved, they would likely address issues such as: • Open space • Parking • Setbacks • Density calculations for dormitory-style or "studio" units • Impact fee reductions • Maximum unit size (projects should not exceed a defined .level or size) 8 ., ROSALL REMMEN CARES VII. Ongoing Revenue Sources. In the event the Town wishes to expand the capacity of the affordable housing program to the level by which a predictable funding source is created, we have identified the following two techniques for further evaluation: 1) Employee "head tax" 2) Property tax Tn each case, the potential might exist to incorporate a "sunset" provision which targets a specific amount of funding to be raised over a 2- to 3-year period, with the tax then being eliminated upon reaching that goal. The purpose for such a program, if desired, would be to assist the community in closing the current deficiency which exists in the supply of affordable housing units through efforts coordinated by the Town, which utilize private sector participation. 9 r Employee Housing Unit Definition: Maximum GRFA 500 s.f. to 900 s.f. Maximum occupancy 2 persons per bedroom Density: employee housing unit equals .5 of a dwelling unit Parking: 1 space per bedroom Kitchen allowed Close proximity to bus or use of private shuttle required Permanent rental restriction Conditional Use review required for project in RC, LDMF, MDMF, HDMF, SDD, ABD, CCIII (possibly other zone districts) Dormitory Housing Unit Definition: Maximum number of 15 units per building Maximum GRFA of 250 s.f. 1 shared kitchen/lounge per 5 units, 350 s.f. minimum for kitchen Maximum occupancy of 2 persons per unit Parking: 1 space per unit Density: .33 of a dwelling unit Close proximity to busline or use of private shuttle required Permanent rental retraction Conditional use review RC, LDMF, MDMF, HDMF, SDD, ABD. CCIII (possibly other zone districts) ORDINANCE NO. 6 SERIES OF 1990 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 8.32 OF TITLE 8 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TO EXPAND, STRENGTHEN, AND CLARIFY CODE PROVISIONS RELATING TO SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES AND PLACES OF EMPLOYMENT. WHEREAS, studies by the Surgeon General of the United States, the National Academy of Sciences and other health organizations have linked passive exposure to tobacco smoke to a variety of negative health conditions in non-smokers; and WHEREAS, the Town Council seeks to achieve a reasonable balance between the rights of smokers and non-smokers by regulating smoking in certain public places and places of employment; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public health, safety, and welfare that smoking be limited in the Town of Vail, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: 1. Chapter 8.32 Smoking in Public Places 8.32.010 Legislative Intent Because the smoking of tobacco or any other weed or plant is a danger to health and is a cause of material annoyance and discomfort to those who are present in confined areas, the Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares it is necessary and beneficial to the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare to regulate smoking in certain public places. 8.32.020 Definitions A. Employee Employee means any person who is employed by any employer. B. Employer Employer means any person, partnership, or corporation, including a municipal corporation, who employs the services of any person(s). -1- C. Bar, Nightclub, Tavern Bar, nightclub or tavern means any establishment primarily engaged in the business of selling or dispensing alcoholic or other beverages. D. Health Care Facility Health Care Facility means any office or institution providing individual care or treatment of diseases, whether physical, mental or emotional or other medical, physiological or psychological conditions. E. Place of Employment Place of employment means any enclosed area under the control of a public or private employer which employees normally frequent during the course of employment. A private residence is not a place of employment. F. Public Place Public place means any .enclosed area in which the general public is permitted, excluding the offices, work areas, employee cafeterias or lounges not generally entered by the public in the normal course of business for use of the premises. A private residence is not a public place. G. Restaurant Restaurant means any establishment or place within an establishment open to the public that offers food and beverages for consumption on the premises. H. Retail Store Retail store means any establishment whose primary purpose is to sell or offer for sale to consumer any goods, wares, merchandise, articles or food for consumption off the premises. I. Smoking Smoking means the lighting of any cigarettes, cigar or pipe, or the possession of any lighted cigarette, cigar, pipe, regardless of its composition. J. Sports Arena Sports arena means any indoor facility primarily used for sports, cultural or similar events. -2- K. Theater Theater means any indoor facility primarily used for the exhibition of any motion picture, stage drama, musical recital, dance, lecture or other similar performance. 8.32.030 Smoking Prohibited A. Smoking is prohibited in public places located in the following: 1. Health Care Facilities 2. Assembly and Meeting Rooms 3. Retail Stores 4. Childcare Centers 5. Banks 6. Theaters and Sports Arena, except when smoking is part of a theatrical production. 7. Laundromats 8. Post Offices B. Smoking is prohibited in any building or vehicle owned or operated by the Town of Vail, Colorado. C. Smoking is prohibited in elevators and buildings generally used by and open to the public including elevators in offices, hotels and multi-family buildings. D. Smoking is unlawful in designated no smoking areas on places of employment as set forth in Section 8.32.050. E. Smoking is prohibited in public places located in Restaurants if the owner or lessee of such places designates all or part of such places as non- smoking by signing the places as set forth in Section 8.32.070. -3- 8.32.040 Smoking Permitted Smoking is permitted in the following public places unless the owner or lessee of such places designates all. or part of such places as non-smoking by signing the places as set forth in Section 8.32.070: A. Restaurants B. Bars, nightclubs, taverns 8.32.050 Places of Employment A. Within 60 days after the effective date of this ordinance the following requirements shall apply in places of employment: (1) The employer shall attempt to reach a reasonable accommodation, insofar as possible, between the preferences of smoking and non-smoking employees; provided, however, that employers are not required to incur any expenses to make structural or physical modifications to accommodate individual preferences; if a satisfactory accommodation cannot be reached, the preferences of non-smoking employees shall prevail-but not to the extent of requiring the expense of structural modifications; (2) Smoking may be permitted in private, fully enclosed offices even though such offices may be visited in the normal course of business by non-smoking employees or occasionally by the public; (3) Smoking shall be prohibited in auditoriums, meeting rooms, elevators, gymnasiums, medical facilities, conferences rooms and rooms containing photocopying or other office equipment used in common by employees; (4) The employer shall designate at least 50 percent of the seating capacity of cafeterias, lunchrooms and employee lounges as no smoking areas; provided, however, that if there are 2 or more lounges available for employee use, one entire lounge may be designated as a smoking area; (5) The employer shall maintain a procedure to resolve employee disputes and objections arising under any smoking arrangement in the place of employment. -4- B. The employer is encouraged to adopt a written smoking policy within the suggested 60 days and to communicate any such policy to all employees within 3 weeks of its adoption. C. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection A of this section, every employer shall have the right to designate any place of employment as a non-smoking area. 8.32.060 Discrimination or Retaliation Unlawful It shall be unlawful for any employer, proprietor or person in charge of public places or places of employment regulated under 8.32.050 (5) to discharge, discriminate against or in any manner retaliate against any person who requests the designation of smoking areas or enforcement within no smoking areas or designated smoking areas. 8.32.070 Signs To advise persons of the existence of "No Smoking" or "Smoking Permitted" areas, signs with letters not less than one inch in height or the international no smoking symbol not less than three inches in height shall be posted as follows: A. In public places where the owner, proprietor or person in charge prohibits smoking in the entire public place a sign using the words "No Smoking" or the international no smoking symbol, or both shall be posted within eye-level at all public entrances or at eye-level and within ten feet of every entry into the public place. B. In public places where certain areas are designated as smoking areas pursuant to this Chapter, the statement "No smoking except in designated areas" shall be conspicuously posted on all public entrances within eye-level or in a position at eye-level within ten feet of entry into the public place. C. In public places where smoking is permitted in the entire building or area assigned using the words "This area is a smoking area" in its entirety shall be conspicuously posted at eye-level either on all public entrances or at eye-level within ten feet of entry into the area or building. -5- 8.32.080 Prohibited Smoking Areas Smoking shall not be permitted and smoking areas shall not be designated in those areas where smoking is prohibited by the Fire Chief, State statute, ordinances, fire code regulations, or other regulations of the Town of Vail, Colorado. 8.32.090 Sale of Tobacco Products to Minors The sale of tobacco in any form from any source to minors shall be prohibited. Anyone witnessed selling any tobacco product to a minor shall be subject to the penalties herein. 8.32.100 Penalty The penalty for violation of any provision of this Chapter is a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). 8.32.110 Violations The following acts constitute violations of this article: (A) Smoking in a posted no smoking area; (B) Failure to post a no smoking sign as required by this article; (C) Willful destruction or defacement of a sign posted as required by this article; (D) Sale of any tobacco product to a minor. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, sub- section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. -6- 4. The repeal of the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or preceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. -7- INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON of 1990, and a public hearing ordinance on the day of Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Ordered published in full this 1990. FIRST READING this day shall be held on this _, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Building, Vail, Colorado. day of , Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION MARCH 26, 1990 12:30 A Work Session on Air Quality. 2:00 Site Visits 3:00 Public Hearing SITE VISITS 1. Approval of minutes from March 19, 1990 meeting. 3 2. A request for a side yard setback variance and a stream setback variance .for Lot 9, Block 3, Vail Row Houses (Unit #9). Applicant: Walter Gramm 2 3. A request for a setback variance for the construction of a garage on Lot 20, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Peter Tufo 4 4. A request for a height variance in order to add dormers to the upper floor of the Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Dr. (Part of Tract B, Vail Village First Filing) Applicant: Rich Brown/Mountain Haus Condo. Assoc. - 5. A request for a conditional use permit to expand a proposed parking structure for the Vail Valley Medical Center on Lots E and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing at 181 West Meadow Drive. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center - 6. A request for a Special Development District in order to construct three primary/secondary structures on Lots 3, 4, and 5, Vail Valley Third Filing. Applicant: Deborah W. and Robert Warner 1 7. A request for an amendment to Special Development District No. 22 and a major subdivision for resubdivision of Lots 1-19, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing No. 3. Applicant: Mr. Pat Dauphinais, Dauphinais - Moseley Construction - 8. A request for a Special Development District at the Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5, Vail Village Fifth Filing at 365 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G. Hill Family - 9. Appoint PEC representative for the April - June, 1990 DRB term. Note: Joint Council/PEC work session Tuesday, March 27, from 12:00-2:00 p.m., regarding employee housing. t` DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA MARCH 21, 1990 3:00 p.m. SITE VISITS 1:00 p.m. 4 1. Ricci Addition to Single Family Residence BR Lot 5, Block E, Vail Das Schone #1 MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 2. Nevin Nelson Sign BR 7-Eleven Building MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Staff approved. 3. The Village on Bighorn Creek - 8 Single Family Homes Lots 1,2 & 3, Block 7, Bighorn 3 MM MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0 Approved with conditions: 1. Approval of four, east units only. 2. Landscaping - list quantities. in plant key - evergreens to be 1/3 at 6', 1/3 at 8' and 1/3 at 10' in height. 6 4. VMRD Landscape Plan MM Athletic Field / 620 Vail Valley Drive MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0 Consent approval. fi 5. Warner Properties - 3 P/S Residences TB Lot 3,4 & 5, Vail Valley 3rd MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING. 6. Bramante/Halesth Duplex, New P/S Residence MM Lot 47 Glen Lyon Subdivision MOTION: Jamie M. SECOND: Diana D. VOTE: 3-0-1 Approved with conditions: Revisions to landscape plan, as discussed. Submit for staff approval. Add additional plant material and more groupings. (30 Dogwood and 10 Serviceberry). Ned Gwathmey abstained. 7. Rivolta - Remodel of Unit #3 MM Gore Creek Plaza Building/193 Gore Creek Drive MOTION: Jamie M. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0 Approved with condition: That the steel apron be painted to match existing aprons. 7 8. Kirch/Berg Duplex MM Lot 3, Gore Creek Park Subdivision MOTION: Diana D. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0 TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING. 3 9. Anderson - Single Family Residence SM Lots 1 & 2, Lionsridge Filing #4 MOTION: Diana D. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0 TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING. ,~ 2 10. Campbell Single Family Residence SM Lot 4, Block 1, Lionsridge Filing #4 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING. 5 11. Riva Ridge South - Exterior Alteration in order to construct an elevator. Lot 7, Block 6, Vail Village 1st MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0 Relocate tree as per PEC requirements build as drawn - planter box 5' from edge of asphalt. 1 12. Elk Creek Meadows - Single Family SM Part of Parcel A, Lionsridge Filing #2 / Phase III The Valley (Conceptual) MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL 13. Spruce Park - 7 Single Family Homes BR Lot 7 part of 6, Block 1, Bighorn 3rd Addition MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING. 14. Dauphinais Subdivision (Conceptual Review) KP Lots 1-19, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL REVIEW - NO VOTE. MEMBERS PRESENT: Diana Donovan (PEC) Pat Herrington Ned Gwathmey Jamie McCluskie STAFF APPROVALS: MEMBERS ABSENT• NONE .f IOWA 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (3Q3j4T9-2138 (303)479-2139 office of community development T0: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 1990 SUBJECT: No Smoking Ordinance Before Ordinance #6 is considered for first reading the staff would like to clarify the purpose of this ordinance and the Council's direction on several areas. The staff wishes to resolve any concerns which may still exist regarding any or all sections of this ordinance prior to a formal reading. Last fall a contingent of concerned citizens approached the Council and requested a smoking ordinance which would prohibit smoking in all public places. There was considerable opposition expressed by the restaurant community. They requested the opportunity to attempt to regulate smoking in their individual establishments without government intervention. Council agreed to allow restaurateurs the opportunity to police themselves for a limited time period after which further evaluations would be made. The group of citizens who initially raised the issue were willing to accept this temporary compromise provided legislation was drafted to prohibit smoking in public places and places of employment. There still seems to be some confusion as to the difference between a public place and places of employment. Although the definition section of the ordinance does address both of these areas, the staff felt it necessary to further explain the distinction. ~;. Changes 1. Public Place and Place of Employment Definitions 8.32.020(C) & 8.32.020(D) A public place is a business or place the primary function of which is to offer a service, function or goods for sale to the general public on a continuous basis during hours of operation. The business or office functions which may be associated with the public place would be considered secondary to the service to customers or patrons. This does not exclude the possibility that portions of this business or public place could be considered as places of employment. A place of employment generally refers to a business or office, the primary function of which is to provide a service to select clients, but not to the public in general. This would refer for example to offices operated by accountants, lawyers, architects, real estate agents, etc. This would refer to the corporate offices of Vail Associates for example. Although Vail Associates functions to provide a service to the public, their corporate offices are operated for the functioning of the business and although they may be frequented by members of the public for business reasons, they are not considered to be a public place. The inclusion of this section in the ordinance is to protect the rights of the employees who may otherwise have no means of recourse for resolution of smoking disputes. It is not the intention of the staff or the intent of the ordinance to include this section as a means to regulate private business. The classification of a business as a public place does not preclude the application of the rules for places of employ- ment. A business such as a retail shop, grocery store or other business may in fact be a public place, but may also have areas such as lunch rooms, business offices or locker rooms which are not generally frequented by the public and therefore are under the jurisdiction of the business owner for policy development. For example, Safeway is considered to be a public place, but it's offices, employee break room and locker room areas are not and it would be up to the manager/owner to set forth policy for these areas. 2. Smoking Permitted 8.32.040 The ordinance has been changed to include Section 8.32.040 which specifically details those public places in Town were smoking is currently permitted and will continue to be permitted at this time. The inclusion of this section should clarify the question of signage which was previously raised and is addressed in Section 8.32.070. 3. Restaurant Signage Where Smoking is Permitted 8.32.070(C) One further area which the staff seeks direction on would be Section 8.32.070(C). This addresses those public places such as restaurants where smoking is permitted. If this section were to be included, it would require restaurants to post signs which would effectively indicate if they have a no smoking section and thereby allow the public to make informed choices based on personal preferences. Is this something the Council wishes to see remain in the ordinance or should this section be deleted? Staff recommends that this section remain. 4. Written Policy 8.32.050(B) Per Council direction this section encourages rather than requires employers to adopt a written smoking policy. 5. Sale of Tobacco to Minors 8.32.090 The other significant change is in Section 8.32.090 which previously addressed the question of vending machines in public places. This section has been changed to conform with Colorado law which prohibits the sale of tobacco or tobacco products to minors from any source.. This places responsibility for compliance on all businesses where tobacco products are sold and not solely on vending machine owners. 6. Violations 8.32.110 Staff deleted knowing failure to inform any person who unknowingly violates this article. These were the major areas of concern as expressed by Council at the last worksession. Since that time the definitions section of the ordinance and Section 8.32.030, areas where smoking is prohibited, have been re-drafted by Larry Eskwith. It is staff's hope that the changes will serve to clarify the intent of the ordinance and make it more easily understood. CONTING TOWN OF VAIL COtINCIL CONTINGENCY REPORT as of March 22, 1990 ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------- 01-0100-52857 Original Budget $100,000 USES: O1-8300-52807 Vail Athletic Ambassador Program 5,000 O1-2100-51210 Vail Affordable Housing Study 10,500 fl1-2100-5121C1 Eagle Co. Housing Needs Assessment 1,000 O1-3310-51210 Fire Services Analysis 29,500 O1-331C1-50100 Hot Winter Nights Promotion 240 O1-8300-52821 Special Events Coordinator 30,000 O1-5110-51210 People Mover UMTA Grant Application 10,C100 01-0100-51101 1990 Census Salary Supplementation 9,000 O1-0100-51210 Recreation/Housing Election Info. -- 4,000 --------- -------------- ------------------------------------- Total Contingency Used 99,240 Council Contingency Remaining: $760 / ~ ~~ 1 March 22, 1990 Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell **** Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Campbell, On behalf of the Vail Town Council and a large representation of the Vail community, I write to-you regarding an issue of grave concern and potentially dangerous Local and national implications. The issue is the proposed Beartree Lot land exchange involving the United States Forest Service, Park Service, Bureau of Land Management and Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum, part-time residents of Vail. The Tennenbaums are seeking a trade of up to 2,000 acres of private land throughout the region for an acre of prime Forest Service land at the base of Vail mountain. To accomplish this trade, the Tennenbaums are seeking congressional support and the enactment of legislative language during the 101st Congress. We stand adamantly opposed to the trade. If allowed success, this trade sets a precedent which threatens Vail's greatest natural resource - Vail mountain and the outdoor experience which it provides to millions of individuals annually. If allowed success, the starting gun has sounded for anyone with financial means to develop property in the location of their choice regardless of public domain - on Vail mountain and elsewhere. We consider the purchase and preservation of land to be used as open space a high priority, in Vail and throughout the nation. However, the issue at hand is far more than simple acquisition of land for public gain. Proponents of the exchange contend that one acre of land on Vail mountain is expendable and can be sacrificed for environmental gain elsewhere. This view is wholly subjective, particularly since no formal environmental studies have taken place, and devalues the outdoor experience received by Vail visitors and residents alike. It does not seem that preserving acreage in undeveloped areas is more important for the overall goal of land protection than preserving an undeveloped portion of a resort area. We are concerned about maintaining local land control and protecting the natural quality of our community and mountain, but our opposition to the Tennenbaum proposal goes far beyond local interests. Should not acquisition of such lands be dictated by our national policy makers and not individuals who are seeking private gain? Under the previous administration, expansion of our public lands system became subject to the free market. The decrease in federal funds for land acquisition, as well as various tax incentives, resulted in the unlikely partnership of environmental groups and land developers just as we are witnessing with the Tennenbaum proposal. Environmental groups, desperate for increased protection of lands became supportive of such acreage swaps, paving a successful. path for individuals such as the Tennenbaums. The result: Any parcel of land, public or not, is for sale if the right price is offered. .Lands being added and taken away from the public lands systems are not dictated by the many, as our democracy should operate, but by the few. It seems that, if this trend continues, the objectives of a comprehensive land acquisition program will never be met. Another point of concern to us is that, because the Tennenbaums will not actually have a legal option on lands to be swapped until congressional action is taken, there is no guarantee the 2,000 acres in question will even be available. The resulting land trade may be even less desirable for the public good than proposed. We respectfully ask that you closely examine the local and national implications of the proposed Beartree Lot land exchange. What is of consequence here are the undermining of Vail's efforts to preserve open space for its community and the State of Colorado, national land acquisition policy implications, the precedent set through such a land exchange maneuver, subjective weighing of one environment's "worth" vs. another's, and federal disregard for local land and zoning control. The price of this transaction, for both the present and future, seems far greater than the gain served by adding 2,000 acres to the public land systems. Please oppose the proposed exchange and encourage your fellow House and Senate members to fight the proposal as well. Thank you in advance for your attention to this important issue facing the Vail community and we look forward to hearing of your views at the earliest possible time. Very Truly Yours, Kent R. Rose Mayor .. Beartree Lot Land Exchange as Proposed by Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum BACKGROUND AND VAIL TOWN COUNCIL PERSPECTIVE BACKGROUND PROPOSAL: Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum, part-time Vail residents, have proposed the purchase and exchange of approximately -2,000 acres of private land for one acre of United States Forest Service land on Rockledge Road at the base of Vail mountain. CONGRESSIONAL ACTION: Because this proposed land exchange requires involvement of the United States Forest Service, Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, and private land owners, congressional action is being sought to expedite the process. The Tennenbaums hired the firm of Ray Kogosvek and Associates to assemble the acreage offerings, as well as lobby Congress to enact the necessary language. Congressional action must be completed by October 1990 if the exchange is to proceed as scheduled. If the congressional action is not completed, the legislative efforts will terminate and the specific language must be reintroduced in the following Congress. VIEWS OF THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL What is of consequence here are the undermining of Vail's efforts to preserve open space for its community and the State of Colorado, national land acquisition policy implications, the precedent set through such a land exchange maneuver, subjective weighing of one environment's "worth" vs. another's, and federal disregard for local land and zoning control. The following reflects the Vail Town Council's reasoning for opposing the Beartree Lot land exchange. These views are based on input derived from public meetings held recently and longstanding municipal policy regarding land exchange matters. LOCAL IMPLICATIONS: Vail Efforts to Preserve Environmental Quality and Open Space The purchase and preservation of land to be used as open space has been a high priority for the Town of Vail throughout the last decade. A total of $10 million in public funds have been spent to protect 1,400 acres from development in the Vail area. Maintaining Forest Service land as open space, even when it becomes private, has long been practiced and the Vail Town Council will not support a proposal which contradicts these local efforts and priorities. Preservation of Certain Lands at the Expense of Others The proposed land exchange threatens Vail's greatest natural resource, Vail mountain. To state that a parcel of land on this mountain is not as "environmentally significant" as parcels located in various other locations is a very subjective call, particularly since no formal environmental studies have been conducted. Proponents of the exchange contend that one acre of land on Vail mountain is expendable and can be sacrificed for environmental gain elsewhere. The Vail Town Council disputes this subjective judgement and urges public land proponents to work toward a net increase of protected public lands rather than the gain of specific acres at the expense of others. Local Control of Land and Zoning The Town of Vail, Vail Associates and the Forest Service have, in partnership, worked to preserve the outdoor experience which millions of individuals enjoy on Vail mountain annually. Local planning processes and zoning regulations are in place to ensure protection of this natural resource, while providing for controlled growth and development. The Vail Town Council will not support subversion of established avenues for such proposals and the dangerous precedent setting potential of this action. Nonbinding Legislation Those hired by the Tennenbaums contend the legislative language would be "site specific... and is not to be ~~ construed as precedent for similar exchanges. The fact of the matter is that no legislative language is binding to future congresses and such legislation, when approved, serves as later justification for similar action. The Vail Town Council will not support efforts which could result in such future proposals. NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS: Subversion of National Land Acquisition Policy The Vail Town Council believes public land acquisition should be dictated by national policy makers, under the auspices of established national land acquisition priority lists. The addition or removal of acreage from the public lands system should not be dictated by private sector agendas, as is the case with the Beartree Lot proposal. Subversion of Traditional Federal Land Exchange Process The administrative process is the traditional route for a federal land exchange, such as the one proposed, and involves studies, environmental impact statements, public input from affected parties, etc. Congressional action to implement such an exchange by-passes these important steps, leaving no information regarding the ecological significance of the parcels of land in question. The Town of Vail opposes the means being pursued to accomplish the proposed exchange. Vulnerability of All Public Lands If the Beartree Lot land exchange is accepted, it would seem that perhaps no acre of land is indeed protected. It becomes evident that if the right offer is made, any parcel of land is fair game. The Vail Town Council will not support an action which undermines the essence of public ownership and leaves all parcels of public land vulnerable. Subjective Judgement of One Person's Wilderness Experience vs. Another's - Vail mountain provides an outdoor experience for millions annually and is indeed the extent of many individuals' outdoor exposures. This swap assumes that preserving acreage in undeveloped areas is more valuable than preserving an undeveloped portion of a resort area. The Vail Town Council is opposed to the exchange as it devalues the nature experience of Vail visitors in favor of that experienced by individuals in other locations. Tennenbaum Currently Has No Option on the Proposed Lands The land exchange proponents will not actually have a legal option on the lands to be swapped until congressional action is taken. Thus, the resulting acreage to be swapped could be quite different and even less desirable for the public good than that proposed. TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department, Kristan Pritz DATE: March 23, 1990 RE: Town Council's direction to amend elements of the zoning code. Over the past two weeks, the Town Council has specifically identified two areas of the zoning code in which they would like to see amendments. These include the minimum lot size for single family lots and a variety of provisions that relate to the parking fee program in Commercial Core I and II. These specific requests are timely in that the staff is presently developing a work program for comprehensive revisions to the zoning code, sign code, and Design Review guidelines. It would be our recommendation that these two amendments be addressed as a part of the overall evaluation of these development codes. The comprehensive evaluation of these codes will certainly involve numerous amendments. As a part of this process, the staff has proposed that all the issues relevant to these codes and guidelines be evaluated and addressed based on a priority plan. Assuming single family lot size and the parking fee program remain priority items, they could be addressed as soon as late May. These two amendments can certainly be addressed in fairly short order if that is the desire of the Council. However, we feel that it makes the most sense to evaluate all required amendments and prioritize them based on a comprehensive evaluation of these development codes. B.. ~: IN PUBLIC PLACES t `~ i ~~ •~ ~ 1, ~: V C O L O R A D O C O U N C I L O N T H E A R T S A N D H U M A N I T I E S -.J ~y ~ . s• Lnaa Lowry Garrnen's Grinerc, 1986 se•• x s~^ oa Mesa College, Learning Resource Crnrer Grand Junccon ,~, R T 1 N P L' B L In 1977 the Colorado General Assemble passed the Art in Public Places Act requiring chat one percent of the construction costs of neN or renovated state-owned buildings be spent to acquire art`cork for permanem display at the project site. Implementation of the laN• is the responsibilit}~ of the Colorado Council on the Ans and Humanities (CCAH). Over the years, the la+.• has been amended to strengthen the program and s[reamline the administration. The current provisions of the laH• are detailed in this brochure. Wh~~ ~~a~ the la~+ established? The expressed desire by the members of the 1eg~slature was to enhance the ~•orking environment and to improve the character and qualm- of state buildings through installation of pemnanent works of an. The State of Colorado introduced the statute "in recognition of iu responsibilit}• to create a more humane environment of distinction, enjo}•ment, and pride for all of its citizens." To that end, the lav.• was passed. Ten }•ears Later, the resulu can be viewed from Grand Junction to Trinidad. Photo: Kuen Mcven Who selects the artwork? C P L A C E S Ho~• is the art~•ork acquired? The jur}• ma}• select the arn+•ork b}• commissioning an artist for work specificall}• designed for a particular site or b}• purchasing an existing piece of artwork. Commissioned artists arc required co prepare and present a final design proposal to the jur}' before a contras for fabrication and installation is awarded. For a direct purchase, the artist receives a contract for sale and installation. The program is open to all artisu, with preference first to arrists who are Colorado residents, and then to arrists from other states and territories. Upon instillation, all purchased or commissioned arnrork becomes the propert}• of the state and a part of the state's permanent public art collection. V1'hat is the funding histon~? The first work of art was acquired in 1978. Since then, approximately 1800,000 of artwork have been purchased for the collection. An usessment of the collection, conducted in January, 1985, indicated an increase in value of 62 percent from the original purchase price. Not all capital construction projects tie eligible for the percent-for•art allocation. In fact, oral}• one-tenth of one percent of a21 spiral construc- tion projecu appropriated by the State of Colorado since tht inceprion of the AIPP program have received percent-for-art funds. CCAH, in conjunction with the client agency, appoinu a different art selecrion committee, or jur}•, for each project. By law, each tommittee has at least eight members: the project architect; a representative of the state client agency; s tenant of the building who will use it on a daily basis; a ddzen az loge who lives in the lot:al community in which the project is being construeud; a professional artist, usually someone who pncnces in the eommunin• in which the proj- ect is located; a member of the board of the Colorado Council on the Aru and Humanities; and one member each from the Stan Senate and House of Representirives. C O L O R A R Ed..ard L„wc Crrau~r B~Ja.l~cr :drtvl 14r: b' ~ 3U' \tnrd !.frduH:d~FrapM lim~rr,m of Colurad~~. it~mafc~ HilUBouldrr __ + a1 Ty R ri 1 ' ;~~ii 5. 1.. t;.•~; ~;,*~ +t..t~e:, l~nnnnu;in lullr~c }i \1~rKen n n C O U N C I L O N T~ i~ l A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E S 1 9 i 8- 1 9 7 9 AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTWORK ARTIST AMOUNT Department of Higher Education Mesa College Grand Junction Houston Hall Remodeling Painring Luis Eades t 5,500 Ceramic Walt Relief Rodger Lang 8,500 Morgan Communiry• College Fon Morgan Andemic Classroom Building Granite Sculpture John Young 4,800 Trinidad State Junior College .Trinidad Fine Arts Auditorium pynang Clark Richen 5,469 l 9 i 9- 1 9 t+ 0 Dc anment of Administration Social Services Denver University of Colorado/Denver Snack Bar Renovation Collage Helen Redman i 1,000 Department of Higher Education Mesa College Grand Junction Houston Hall Remodeling Marble Sculpture Frank Swanson 10,000 Morgan Community Collegt Fon Morgan Academic Classroom Building Steel Sculpture Fred Myers 600 Unit•ersin of Colorado Boulder Ramalev Building Wood Sculptures (2) Roben Behrens l 5,000 Ceramic Nall Reliefs (5) Jack Bowers 5,400 Photographs (l5) Chris Brown 5,500 Ceramics (4) R. Douglas Fev 5,014 Batiks (2) Alice McClelland 2,400 Wearing Lesley Shearer 5,400 ' Dnw•ings (2) Craig Smith 1,100 pint Barbara Takenaga 200 Painting George Woodman h 4,000 400 1 Weavings (2) Charlotte Ziebart , University of Colorado Colorado Springs Science Building Aluminum Sculpture Erick Johnson 5,600 Universin of Colorado/ Demrr Intensive Cart Unit Renovation Health Sciences Center Marble Sculpture George Turner 1,900 University of Northern Colorado Greeley Caner Hall Renovation Weaving Susan Hoover 5,000 Ceramic Wall Relief Jovice Newrttan 6,000 Ceramic Sculpture Nada Seibel 1,500 Wood Sculpture Bruce Taylor 6,000 University of Southern Colorado Pueblo Asset Building Wood k Steel Sculpture Carl Reed 22,539 Depanment of Administration Social Services Denver Blind and Deaf Rehabilitation Center Marblt Sculptures Madeline Wiener 8 5,200 Copper Wall Relief William Motton 1,595 Wood Wall Relief Vincent O'Btien 1,205 Depanmmt of Corrections Canon Ciry New Tag Plant Ceramic Wall Relief Ken Williams 5,800 Canon Ciry• Inmate Sertices Building Ceramic Wall Relief Ken Williams 5,000 a a N P U B L I C P L A C L S R T I A 1 980-1981 (continued) ' ARTIST AMOUNT LOCATION itiVORK PROJECT/AR AGENCY nt of Education Denver' State Office Building Reno~ition i ~~ Dotts~elty = 795 Departme c Cerartt Depattmmt of Higher Eduction ado State University l C Fort Collins Crnter D pv Rexanna Bartlett 750 15,285 or o nung Steel Sculpture Richard Mdes Hotchkiss Roger Mesa Experimrntal Station Wood Q Steel Sculpture Cul Reed 2,440 University of Colorado Colorado 5 rin s p g Dwite Hall Remodeling Painting Muilyn Markowitz 4,246 Univers;n• of Colorado/ Denver Intensive Can Unit Renotation Wood Sculpture Roger AsaY Nancy Smith 6,092 1,550 5 Health Sciences Center Fiber garbua Donachy 0 5 550 P na (2 Mulea Ta~lor 487 n ) Painting Suzy Roes er aclc Bowers J 1,100 Cenmu Wall Relief University of Southern Colorado Pueblo Ph sinl Maintenance Plant Concrete Wall Relief Sandra Robishaw 9,000 Depattment of Institutions i Golden Golden Gate Youth Camp Roger Asay 900 ces Division of Youth Sen Wood Sculpture Brighton Adams County Center Photographs (2) Chris Brown 268 Department of Lora] A$airs Denver Firing Range Photographs (10) N,nty Wood 2,509 1 9 8 1- 1 9 8 2 Department of Higher Eduction her Eduction Center Hi i Denver Landsu ing Fib ture r Scul Barbua Baer 8 1,500 g /,urar a Universiq• of Colorado Boulder e p Ramaley Hall Renovation Dnw~ngs (2) Ma~yynn Duke Edwud Lowe R 1,500 9,256 Holographic Sculpture ntin l P . Roberto Lucero ]0,579 500 1 g ai Mura Ceramic ~p~ Sartoris Cnig Smith , 1,800 Drawings (2) Sandra Witcow 5,100 Painring 1982-1988 cess completed for projecu in Grarid Juncrion, Pueblo and Boulder. Contracu signed in FY 85-84. Jury selection pro 1 9 8 8- 1 9 8 4 Depar>st,ent of Adminisiruion Gland Junction Gened Purpose Administration Building ~lizabetlt MapeUi f 20,000 Glass Moral Krnneth Williams ~~~ Ceramic Sttslpture pepartment of Eduction hool for the Deaf and Blind S Colorado Springs Main Hall Addition Mural Painting ~ ~n 5,500 12,500 c Marble 8c 54u Mosaic S J .Moved w School for the Deaf and Blind in Colorado Springs -, r' ._ ( A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E S 1 9 8 8- 1 9 8 4 (continued) AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTWORK ARTIST AMOUNT De mrnt of Higgher Eduntion olondo State Universiq• Fort Collins Glover Building Renovarion Clark Richert i 15,450 Painting Dewing Oath Murphy 1,250 Paintingg Carol Nordgren 1,600 prince (S) Marlea Taylor 750 Pucblo Vocational Community Pucblo Replacement of Heating Plant Rose Bar 2,56>s College Ceramic Inlay ry Universin• of Colorado Boulder Chemistry Building Renovation Anne Currier ~~ Dravring Painung Jem DeLaCruz 600 Paintings (3) Luis Eades 1,100 Soo Cenmtc Painting James Foster Craig Hansen 750 Bronze Sculpture Gan• Voss s00 Dante Addition to Petiottning Arta Building Granite Q Steel Scu]pturc John Young IO,S50 University of Colorado Colorado Springs Engineering and Applied Sciences Budding Glass Muni Elizabeth Mapelli Y0,150 Ccnmic Mural john Lewis 15,000 DraMing Marilyn Duke 10,150 Main Ha11 Remodeling Emironmennl Sculpture Beth Juliar•Skodje 5,141 1 9 8 4- 1 9 8 5 De artment of Administration l Department of Education Denver Stmt GedtMeBdualA nal Scul cure p George Peters = 25,000 Deparvnem of Cornctions do Territorial Correctional l C Canon Ciry Cellhouse 1 Ie 7 Steel Sculpture Chris Byars s9,000 ora o Faciliry• Environmental Sculpture Andrew Leicester 19,500 Department of Higfier Eduntion Universit)• of Colorado Colorado Spring: Engtneering and Applied Scences ldi ng Bui Steel Sculpture Roben Behrens 29,800 1 9 8 5- 1 9 8 6 Department of Higher Eduntion Mesa College Gtartd Junction Learning Resource Censer Roxana Bartlett t 1,500 Fiber Photograph Phyllis Baumann 750 1 600 ' Aluminum Wall Sculpture William Burrggess ine Calzolari El . 5,000 Sandstone Sculpture Paintings (2) a Marc Conly 650 Painting i Michael Duffy Marilyn Dukc 1.200 1,500 ng Dew painting Robert Ecker 1, lhotognph CeTamKS (~ ~a~' Emrich A Douglas Fey F 1,500 400 2 groom W Scylptun oster ]ames . ~ painting Photograph rarrt Ann Furumo Linda Girvin 2,500 ~ Suzanne Hanson ~~ amics (s) Ca Carol ICliger •~ •~ A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E S 1 9 8 5- 1 9 8 6 (continued) AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTNORK ARTIST AMOUNT Department of Higher Eduction Mcu College Grand Junction Paper Mary EUen Long = 550 1000 Panong Fiber Linda Lowry Jane Mathews 1,600 Drawing print Cath Murphy Theodore Thomas !00 270 9 8 6- 1 9 5 7 Deparvnmt of Higher Eduction Fort Levv~s College Durango Noble Hall Classroom Building 500 i 18 Fiber Sculpture Aluminum & Neon Sculpture Geo peters Be Erick Johnson , 6,500 Mesa College Grand Junction Learning Resource Center Steel Sculpture William Bu ess B 80,000 Morgan Communin• College Fort Morgan Voc~tional/Administntion Facility Fiberglass Wall Relief Susan Furini 4,500 University of Northern Colorado Greeley Kepner Hall Renovation Ceramic Sculpture Barbara Grygutis 31,000 Western State College Gunnison Taylor Hall Renovation Steel & Granite Sculpture J.P. Rico Furman 27.000 y c I t, C ~: Depanment of Administration Social Services Denver Administnoon Building Renovation = 4 4~ Aluminum Sculpture i i William Bur ess g lames Colbert . 2,900 ~ nt ng Pa Prints (3) Bennis Cunningham 1,455 t print Atthur Geisert Paul Gillis Y,S00 Y,500 Painting Photographs (3) David Diaz Guerrero 645 Fiber (3) Connie Lehman 1,200 Paintin ra Linda Lowly 2,500 750 phs (2) Photog Photographic Installation Karen Meyers Barbara Jo Revelle 9,000 Painting Clark Richen Woodman Beer 6,000 3,500 Print Ceramic y Berry Woodman 5,500 Paintin George Woodman 5,000 Ceramu Mural Nina Yankowitz 6,000 Depattment of Higher Eduction Colondo School of Mines Golden Berthoud is Stratton Hall Renovations Clark Richert George Woodman 3.000 6,000 ' Painting Paintin e John Young 38,500 & Steel Sculpture Gnnit Department of Public Safety Colondo Sate Patrol Golden New Administration Facility Paula Cnnc 1,005 Prints (8) Photograph Barbara Houghton Y00 Cihl;il'Q:~~ CUl<)iC~: Gl't t~i( ,'~l'~~ Qli~ Hr:1)~Cilll~lr'~ 770 Pennsylvania Scrett Denver, Colorado 80208 .~ ` ., .~ A R T I I\ P L' B L I C ,- ~~'~~. ~~ P L A C E S \tanl~n Duly t'nr;ird lnp~~:R. 14si 5~' > >. Pa~:e! and caioTCd prucil The Selection Process t'm~rr.u. of Colnnd~. EnRinarnnF and A1•pi:cd Scn:~cr. Building C.•iurad..• SprinPs All artwork is selected b.• a ditTerent committee, or jury, for each project. (See text for details on jun• composition). CCAH staff facilitates the selection process and the CCAH board reviews jut}• recommendations for final approval. All meetings are open to the public and are announced as such. The selection process takes approximately six months to complete: . The jun• meets on site to discuss the architectural plans t"'"`~` •~i"" Pr:rt' worlmF u:~ Sl~.~rp;. 1~~~ and identifi' locations and t.•pes of artwork most appro- Drl:~nmrm of .~dm:r.a;r~uun. priate for that site. Arn+•ork may be acquired through the c„~,• oe„r eu;Idmg~Urn.,•; direct purchase of existing work or through asite-specific commission. . Artists are notified regarding details of each project. The Collection • Applications and slides are received by CCAH and Number of artworks 175 organized through the Colorado Artists Register. Number of artists repnsenced 121 • A panel of visual arts professionals meeu to pre-screen Number of Colondo arasu l07 the applicants' slides. Number of out-of-state • The jury meets a second ame to review the remaining arusa 14 applicanu' slides; finalists are selected. Funding Histor}' • Finalists are contacted to prepare final proposals. Fy 78.79 8 17,269 • The jury meeu a third ame to t~iew finalists' site- 79-80 96,967 specific proposals and budgets; final recommendations 80.81 68,928 are made to the CCAH board. 81-82 31,035 82-83 -0- • Jury recommendations are presented co the CCAH board 65-84 140,159 for final approval. 84-85 172,800 • The mved artist enter into a contract with CCAH. 85-86 47,345 aPP 86-87 127,500 a7-88 lo2sss Tod 8779,SS3 Photo: Laren Meyers H E A R T S A N D H U M A N I T I E S Elvur Cali•.i.t. Archc. ~~. I4~i btraa CulirK.. Lrananf ..P Other States With Percent-For-Art Legislation Alaska Nevada A~~• New Hampshire Connecticut NM' 3~~5'• District of Columbia New Mexico Florida Oregon Hawaii Pennrylvania Illinois South Carolina' lows T~• .J'~ Maine Unh• Massachusetts Washington Michigan' Wisconsin ^ Minnesota' Wyoming Montana' Nebraska 'voluntary tksigre t.Yesstlman Desian Assodaies '.:/~i..tt~ -~..~.."s_ - Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities 770 Pennsyl~•ania Street Denver, Colorado 80203 27 0-120-000 This brochure highlighu and identifies the artwork acquired by the Snte of Colondo as a result of iu ~~ns° lase program. For further information and ap X70 Pennsylvania wnnct the Art in Public Places Prog'ran-. Street. Denver, Colondo 80203 (Telephone: 303/866-5457}. Sande Robishaw Unoded. 1911, 560 square ka (S° runauK ~ ConcMr Universip• of Soucltern Caloradd>'uea° ~,..A.~ -:.~.%r- BULK RATE U.S. Postage PAID Denver, CO Permit No. 788 A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E 5 a= } +- COLORADO REVISED STATIITES volume lOB 1988 Replacement volume Government 1B Edited, Collated, Revised, Annotated, and Indeed IInder the Supervision and Direction of the by CHARLES W. PIKE OF THE COLORADO BAR, REVISOR OF STATIITES, AND THE OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE LEGAL SERVICES Published with Annotations through 745 P.2d 1391, 674 F.Supp.1584, 834 F.2d 1583, 108 S. Ct. 1129, 79 Bankr. 1023, 58 U.Colo. L. Rev. 514, and 64 Den. U.L. Rev. 750 and from 16 Colo. Law. 495 through 17 Colo. Law. 602 Reenacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado as the Statutory Law of Colorado of a General and Permanent Nature Bradford Publishing Co. Denver, Colo. Printers and Distributors ALLOCATION FOR ART ARTICLE 80.5 Allocation for Art 24-80.5-101. Works of art in public places - allocations therefor from capital construction costs - guidelines - fund created. 24-80.5-102. Works of art. in correctional facilities. 24-80.5-101. Works of art in public places - allocations therefor from capital construction costs - guidelines - fund created. (1) (a) The state of Colorado, in recognitiori of its responsibility to create a more humane environment of distinction, enjoyment, and pride for all of its citizens and in recognition that public art is a resource which stimulates the vitality and economy of the state's communities and which provides opportunity for artists and other skilled workers to practice their crafts, declares it to be a matter of state policy that, when appropriate, a portion of each capital construction appropriation be allocated for the acquisition of works of art to be placed in public places. (b) There is hereby established an art in public places program to be administered by the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities. All works of art purchased and commissioned under the art in public places program shall become a part of the state art collection developed, administered and operated by the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities. (2) As used in this section, unless the context othewise requires: (a) "Architect" means the person or firm designing the public construction project. "Architect" includes architects, landscape architects, interior designers, and other design professionals. (b) "Artist" means a practitioner in the visual arts generally recognized by his peers or critics as a professional who produces works of art. "Artist" does not include the architect of a public building under construction or any member of his architectural firm. 24-80.5-101 (c) "Public construction project" means a capital construction project subject to the provisions of section 24-30-1303(3). (d) "Works of art" means all forms of original creations of visual art including but not limited to: (I) Sculpture, in any material or combination of materials, whether in the round, bas-relief, high relief, mobile, fountain, kinetic, or electronic; or (II) Painting, whether portable or permanently fixed, as in the case of murals; or (III) Mosaics; or (IV) Photographs; or (V) Crafts made from clay, fiber and textiles, wood glass, metal, plastics or any other material, or any combination thereof; or (VI) Calligraphy; or (VII) Mixed media composed of any combination of forms or media or (VIII) Unique architectural stylings or embellishments, including architectural crafts; or (IX) Environmental landscaping; or (X) Restoration or renovation of existing works of art of historical significance. (3)(a)(I) Except as provided in section 24-80.5-102, and except for agricultural facilities where livestock are housed or agricultural products are grown, and except for the diagnostic center located in the city and county of Denver, and except for the facilities authorized by section 1 of Senate Bill No. 101, enacted at the second regular session of the fifty-fifth general assembly, each capital construction appropriation for a public construction project shall include as a nondeductible item an allocation of not less than one percent of the capital construction costs to be used for the acquisition of works of art. 24-80.5-101 (II) Repealed, L.86, 2nd Ex. Sess., p. 19, 3, effective August 26, 1986. (b) If the allocation provided for in paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) is equal to or greater than one thousand dollars, the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities shall select a jury as described in paragraph (aj of subsection (5) of this section. (c) If the allocation provided for in paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) is less than one thousand dollars, the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities may, at its discretion, either select a jury or direct that the funds be held within the works of art in public places fund described in subsection (6) of this section for the acquisition of works of~ art for the state agency for which the capital construction project is to be constructed. Whenever the funds for any state agency equal or exceed one thousand dollars, the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities shall select a jury as described in paragraph (a) of subsection (5) of this section. (d) The works of art acquired under this article shall be placed in a publicly accessible location within the state agency for which the capital construction project is to be constructed. A collection of works of art may be selected for placement within the state agency, and, at the discretion of the state agency and the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities, made available for loan, circulation and exhibition in other public facilities. (4) The office of state planning and budgeting, in both the planning and review stages in the construction of state buildings and other public facilities, shall be responsible for insuring compliance with the provisions of subsection (3) of this section. (4.5) The administration of the Art in Public Places program includes supervision of the jury process which convenes to select the site and the artwork, contracting, purchase, commissioning, reviewing of design, execution and placement. Acceptance of works of art shall be the responsibility of the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities. 24-80.5-101 (4.5) (continued) These activities shall be conducted in consultation with the executive directors of the respective state agencies. The administration of the Art in Public Places program shall not include bearing the costs of maintaining or insuring the works of art. Such costs shall be the responsibility of the respective state agencies. (5) All works of art acquired with funds allocated under subsection (3) of this section shall be contracted for separately from all other items in the original construction plans pursuant to the following guidelines: (a) Selection of artists shall be by the jury method. The Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities shall. select jury members and convene juries. -Jury recommendations shall be presented to the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities for review and final approval. Any significant changes in the design or construction of the work of art occurring after such final approval of the artist shall be subject to the approval of both the jury and the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities. The Council shall determine which changes shall be considered "significant" for the purposes of this paragraph (a). Each jury shall contain at least the following: (I) A representative from the contracting state agency for which the capital construction project is to be constructed; and (II) The architect; and (III) A professional artist; and (IV) A representative from each community in which a capital construction project is to be constructed; and (V) A member of the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities. (VI) Repealed, Ii. 83, p. 1015, 2, effective June 15, 1983. (VII) A representative from the contracting state agency who is a tenant or future tenant of the capital construction site; and 24-80.5-101 (VIII) A member of the state House of Representatives to be appointed by the Speaker of the House; and (IX) A member of the state Senate to be appointed by the President of the Senate. (b) Repealed, L.83, P.1015, 2, effective June 15, 1983. (c) Residents of Colorado shall be the participants of this program except for artists from other states and territories who have achieved national recognition in their specific forms of expression. (d) Jury members who are not state employees shall be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel expenses incurred in fulfilling their duties under this section. Such expenses shall be deducted from the one percent allocation for art. (6)(a) There is hereby created in the state treasury the Works of Art in Public Places fund, any moneys in which are hereby appropriated to the Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities, which fund shall be used exclusively for the following purpose: Purchase of works of art, taking into consideration the artist's preliminary site visit, the design fee, the total costs of construction and installation of the work of art, jury expenses, and program administration in compliance with the provisions of subsection (5) of this section. (b) All moneys allocated for the acquisition of works of art pursuant to subsection (3) of this section shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit the same to the Works of Art in Public .Places fund. Any unexpended moneys shall remain in the fund at the end of the fiscal year and shall not revert to the capital construction fund. f l 24-80.5-101 (c) If any moneys allocated for the acquisition of works of art pursuant to subsection (3) of this section are not expended after the jury has been convened and has rendered its decision, such moneys shall remain in the Works of Art in Public Places fund to be used for the capital construction project for which they were allocated or shall revert to the general fund. (7) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the placement of works of art in public places other than those placed pursuant to this section. Source: L. 77, p. 1252, 1;L. 79, p. 887, 7;L. 83, pp. 1014, 1015, 1, 2; L. 85, p. 631, 2; L. 86, p. 768, 4; L. 86, 2nd Ex. Sess., p. 19, 3, L. 87, pp. 1112, 1114, 1, 4, 3, 2. Editors note: The diagnostic center located in the Denver metropolitan area was authorized by senate Bill No. 155 (chapter 135, Session Laws of Colorado 1986). Senate Bill No. 101 (chapter 48, Session Laws of Colorado 1986) authorized youth training aad detention facilities, and additional facilities in Pueblo, to be operated by the Department of Institutions. Cross references: For the establishment of the state Council on the Arts and Humanities, see article 9 of title 23. 24-80.5-102. Works of art in correctional facilities. (1) Each capital construction appropriation for a correctional facility shall include as a nondeductible item an allocation of not less than one-tenth of one percent of the capital construction costs to be used for a prison inmate art fund. They moneys in such fund shall be used for materials to allow inmates to create works of art to be included in the construction of or to be placed permanently in such facility. The Department of Corrections shall administer by rule and regulation a competitive program among the inmates of such facility in order to determine which art projects and inmates shall receive an incentive award not to exceed two hundred dollars each. The Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities shall appoint one of its members to serve in an advisory capacity to the department of corrections on the implementation of this section. (2) For the purposes of this section, "correctional facility" means any state facility in which persons are or may be lawfully held in custody as a result of a conviction of a crime. Source: L. 87, p. 1115, 5. ~~~ ~t •-, ~ESIGn•ARiS Issue 6, Fall 1989 About This Issue Most of us feel overwhelmed by the rampant growth intruding on Americas rural landscape. Every place begins to look like every other place. Good planning and design are hard to find. Fortunately; organizations like the National Trust for Historic Preservation. the Center for Rural fdassachusetts. the Conservation Foundation. and Scenic America believe that we can protect rural America. We know the way. they say, but •ae need the will. Several of these organizations will participate in the NASAA '69 session. on "Design in the Rural landscape." on Friday afternoon, November 10. In response to an overwhelming interest by state arts agencies in the topic. this issue of State Arts Design Arts focuses on the rural landscape and what we can do in a very practical way to preserve it. Meg Maguire, Editor Visualizing Land Use Decisions in the Rural Landscape It has always been hard for planners to communicate the implii:a- tions of land use regulations. Laymen and municipal officials have difficulty visualizing how a zoning change will effect the physical development of, say, a strip of state highway. Now, however, through a tech- nique called "visual simulation" people can see what zoning and subdivision regulations will produce. The idea is composed of three parts. First, today's conditions are illustrated; second, based on current zoning and land use regula- tions, the situation as it would appear in five years is simulated ~~isualh•; finally, based on a revised set of "considerate" regulations, the appearance of an alter- native version is produced. one that is the result of good planning. An exce]lent example of how ~zsual simulation works has recentl~• been published - amacro-planning docu- ment that de~•elops alternative futures for the center st::p of Massachusetts. Called Dealing with Cbange in the Connecticut Ri;: er l~alley:.~ Design .Ylanual for. Conser ~•ation and De:•elop- mrnt, the work was carried out b}• The Center for Rural Massachusetu and published by The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Regarded as a seminal work, the book has received awards from the American Societti• of Land- scape Architects and the ~iational Trust for Historic Preservation. The manual addresses the need to accommodate growth while respecting the unique natural and historic ele- ments of the icon we 1•now as the traditional New England villave. The authors accommodate today's-lifest<•le and property development e~•pectaaons while preserving the livabilit~~ and em-i- ronmental quality that gives rise to the desire to live there. In simple terms, these guidelines offer a way to keep from "killine the goose" - in this case, the wonderful vistas, landscapes and buildings that make up the rural Connecticut River Valle~•. "In the past two weeks alone, two developer have come voluntarily to see us," says Randall Arendt, Associate Carr. ar pq. _' .Typical house•lot development destroys rural character. Conventional zoning and subdivision regulations consume entire track for house lots and streets. Typical municipal road standards produce excessively wide thoroughfares which encourage h~gn speed traffic. Cluster housing based on historic settlement pattern. Open space zoning preserves open space by requiring new development laid out in the tradition of a typical compact villaoe or town. Rural viAage prior to development. Dear State~Regionai Arts Agencies: Since pining the Endowment's Design Arts Program in March, t've tlravekd to Catifomia, Georgia, ~irrois, Minnesota, and Texas. to the caning nronMs 1'll be visiting the Fbrtheast and Florida. My goal is to seam about regional, stile and local design issares first hand. By understanding the concerns of your constituents we can shape the direction of our Program to rtspond to your needs swiftly and with precision. Everywhere 1've been I have found enormous enthusiasm for the potential of design to create a more humane, considerate and beautiful public realm. This is at the top of our priority list. We can help with our grant and initiative programs, but the doing gets done at the local level. Where you are. We understand that, ~ we are developing new attorts fo address your ambitions. The Mayors' Institute for City Design, now in its fourth year, is being expanded after its shakedown period in Virginia, to the South (New prisons}, Midwest (Minneapolis), and West (Btriceley). We will be working with the Architectural Foundation (part of the AIA) b extend its excellent "Search for Shelter" program iMo the area of law income housing. And finally, we will mount "Your Town," a nationwide design• asSlStanCe Kral inltlatiVE that will concentrate on towns, villages and the spaces between cities. We strangfy advocate that each state develop adesign-oriented eanponent, for only then is our Program able to provide effective support There's a long way b go: only seven states have a full program and about t5 others have a shared portfolio setivity. He,+,ember, our Washington start and network of Regional t9eprestntatives wn provide the vital background information you need. !Randolph M.N. McAusland Director, Design Arts Program Iowa Arts Council Initiates Town Sc_'~*~s Program "A town square is to a communin• what a photo album and famil~• room ue to a family. It is a place for collec- tive memory of important events and people and a place where communin• life can flouish. Looking co another communin• for ideas for tour town square is like wading photo albums and family rooms with your neiehbor." It-lark Chidistrr, lo-~:a State L'nrversity In 1987 the Iowa Arts Council convened 19 top design and devel- opment experts to focus on one of the state's most endearing charac- teristics: the town squares in the many small farming communi- ties. The aim of the program is to encourage townwide revitalization using new or redesigned central squares as a focal point. 1~ine communities ranging in population from 1,000 to 8,000 par- ticipated in design plannin, ~~ orkshops and were invited to submit applications for matching grams. In June, 1989 Governor Terrv Branstad announced the selection of five communities for funding. The Arts Council awarded $45,000 to Vlinterset (pop. 4200), birthplace of the actor John Wavne, for design and rede~•elopment of the existing town square. The town of Lamoni (pop. 0 ~) received $8000 to design a new town square in an existing city park. A group of artists, architects and land- scape architects will convene for three days in each commu- nity to design squares that meet the func- tional and aesthetic goals outlined by each town in its applica- non. Three other towns have received $2000 grants for technical assistance to further dr~•elop their proposals. Iowa Town Squares is funded be the Iowa state legislature. For more infor- mation, contaa ;`;atolls Hala, Executive Director, Iowa Arts Council. Capitol Complex, Des Moines, IA X0319. Visualizing Land Use Curn. from pq. I Director of the Center. "In just rwo hour I redesigned a com•entional subdivision so-that it incorporates adequate open space guidelines." Instead of lot sizes. setbacks and cul-de-sacs, we are presented with "be- fore" and "afrer" perspecti~•e drawings. The manual is as much a design teach-. ing tool for the general public as it is a manual for professional planners and landscape architects. Funher, it represenu a regional approach to development planning thar must bC serioush viewed as the reasonable way to solve environmental, transportation and development needs. ~~'ithout such cooperation and discussion among municipalities, apiecemeal approach often results in the familiar strip de~'el- opment and open-field subdivision that robs the undrrhing character and livabilin• of places. "You can live lecture. but unril the town revelations are chanrd to require open space w•e won't see p~r,irive results." said Arendt. In the past year ~~ e'ee already had at least six ~Iassachu- stns towns change their regulations in line ~~•ith our recommendations." Thr Center serves as the principal technical assisrance advisor to the Rural Design Assistance Program of the Mas- sachusetu Council on the Arts and Hu- manities. The manual promises to be useful to other state arts agencies in addressing rural and small community design issues. For more information contatt Randall Arendt, The Center for Rural ~lassachuseta at the Universin• ofMas- sachuserts, .~nherst, MA, 01003 1413)3•+3-?:~~. Mr. Arendt is available to present his slide show and lecture throughout the country. T'o order a copy of the manual, send S?7.50 to: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 26 Trowbridge St., Cambridge. ~'IA 02138, Attn: Charles ~~•aIis, (61-)661-3016. ~ National Trust Rural Preservation, Tourism and Main Street Programs ti Offer New Opportunities for State Partnerships The National Trust for Historic Preservation is looking for new state and tocat partners on three initiatives affecting the rural landscape. The Rural Preservation Initiative directed by long-time rural expert and activist, Nl`arilvn Fedelchak, has three aims: 1. to increase the capacity of the Trust to respond to rural needs; 2. to shape public policl• on the national, state and local levels; and 3. to develop new programs. "Small rural communities are eking us for design assistance. In a recent phone survey of L' .Main Sveet communities under 10,000 (pop.), 10 requested design assistance, "says Fedelchak. "State arts agencies can promote both economic development and preservation through their design are programs. Partnerships with state are agencies have shown great promise and wwe hope the collaboration will continue." The Trust's latest rural assistance publication, Sa-~ing.9»rerica'.r Coun~ry- side: ,9 Guide ro Ruro1 Conser,;atiorr, presents 28 case studies of communities from Vermont to Hawaii. The book is helping small communities take charge of their own destinies b~- providing step-by-step detail on how' co organize a consen•ation effon, inventon• available resources, work for effective new laws, sec up land trusts, take advantage of federal programs, and involve the public. The Tourism Initiative is de- signed to heighten awareness of historic resources within the travel industry and to educate the preservation community on the value of tourism. Initially the Trust will work with four states~to help communities develop long-term grass- roots tourism strategies for marketing historic resources and other atmetions to the traveling public. The budget for the program is 52.E million dollars, funded by a NEA Challenge grant of 3300,000 with a 3- to-1 match prodded by four states plus corporations and foundarions. The Main Street Center works primaril}• with states and offers broad opportunities for state are councils to be pan of a team to assist small com- munities. One of the most celebrated Trust programs, the Center has assisted at least X00 communities in 30 states during its ten year history. "We're still beginning programs in new tow-ns," sa}'s Billy Parrish, Director of the Center. "But our most critical chat- Ienge now• is to move from re~italiza- tion to management. Communities are beginning to realize that long-term management is much slower and harder than then had envisioned at the outset. The key to sustaining revitalization is to sustain good management along main street." Parrish and his staff of 25 plan to offer more advanced information and services on real estate issues, design management, and financing business improvement districu to Main Street towns. "ti~'e need design professionals to work with business people. to show that good design is smart business." For more information on services and publications ,contact the National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1 i 85 l~lassachusetcs Ave., \`VV, ~~'ashington, DC 200.16. P SCENIC AMERICA CHALLENGES BILLBOARD INDUSTRY Almost nothing wdl destroy the comrrwnities set controls on signs trees on public land and promoting distinctive dwracter of a community and billboards, and to strengthen cigarettes and alcohol next to fas'tat than iurcorrtrolled signs and federal controls on visual pollution. churches, homes and playgrounds. biboards. Scenic America, formery 'A drive for pless<ue feels more pmtiatlariy in minority known as the Coalition for scenic Bce a dove through the Yelbw cteighbonhoods. The trashing of Beauty, has manned a rart>paign Pages,' says Ed filcMahon, tfis coumry oast stop.' b haft the spread of billboard bight Executive Direcdor of Scenic For moot information cornact Though the Center for Sign Control America. "The Highway Scenic America, 216 7th St, SE, the organization provides Beautification Act, ttteartt to control Washington, DC 20003, iMormation, technical assistance billboards along federal highways. a (20Z)546-t 100. and kigal expertise to help a failure. Billboards are destroying State and Regional Perspectives Massachusetts Funds Rural Design Projects Through the Rural Design Assistance Program a total of 1 i small towns, each with a population under 10,000, has received grants from the Massachusetts Council. In awarding the grams former Executive Director Anne Hawley noted: "The design of our buildings, our streeu, and our neighborhoods are as much a reflec- tion of who w•e are and how w•e live as is any painting, sculpture or dance performance." On the new provision to incorpo- rate an education component for school children she said: "Rural design projects give schools a wonderful opportunin- to offer curricula on zoning,brir3ge technology, architec- ture ....These can be combined with actual field trips to their ow•n commu- nities and meetings with the profes- sionals making the decisions." The Council is just completing a primer on basic design issues for com- munin• members and professionals, as well as a Grridebool; to Selerred Projects i» Desig~r Educariorr. Kansas Sponsors "Building by Design: A Design Arts Symposium" Attracting neark 100 participants in the middle of Au;ust, the I::tnsas Arts Commission held its first design arts conference to encourage arts organizations and communin• lenders co integrate design of cultural facilities into eommunin• planning and state economic growth. "This Was the first time .~•e've all talked to each ocher," said Dorothy Agen, Executive Director. "ll'e've already stared what promises to be a long and productive collaboration. One step we've taken is to incorporate the grant guidelines for historic preservation right into our capital program guidelines. We're all on the same side of the street and we didn't know it. It's really snowballing!" As a result of the conference, the Dept. of Commerce which operates the Alain Street program will now draw on the Commission to provide technical assistance to smart to~rns that are planning cultural programs or converting historic buildings to per- forming arts space. vermont mans t>tovemor s Conference on Design and the Suitt Environment Under the leadership of Joanne Chow Winship, Executive Director of the Vermont ARs Council, Governs Madeleine Ktrnin will host the Governor's Conference on Design and the Butlt Environment. Scheduled for November 3,1989 the conference Mnll be the first Conprehensive examination of tfte design issues facing Vemrorrters who are shaping future buildings, villages, dries and towns. Architects. landscape architects, planners, preservationists, builders. developers and state offirtials will come together for a one day Conference on opportunities and obstacles to good design in Vermont. Executive Directors Discuss Design Arts i At the suggestion of Jonathan Katz, Director of the National ' Assembly of State Arts Agerraes, executive directors from eight states met following the April NASAA meeting to discuss their new or expanding design arts programs. ED's from Vermont, tltah. Northam Marianas. Hawaii, ' Kansas, Iowa, Arkansas. and Idaho. and staff from New York State, attended the one-day workshop organized by Environmental Images under cooperative agreement with the i NEA. On August 3. Adrienne Hirsch and Randy McAustand convened the first rrreenng of the State Artsl Design Arts Advisory Group. Executive directors from Vemront, I Arizona, Iowa, Arts Midwest. and NASAA offered irnaluable suggestions on the future of tfre program. On October 27.28 tfre first design arts regional workshop for executive directors will be frosted by the Rhode Island State Coundl on the Arts for states in the Northeast. Fa more iMorrtra6on, I contact Buff Kavetman, I (212) 614.2900. 1/esrgn Hrts r-ta to NASAA Neighborhood Tour kl what promises t0 b8 a fuq acrd lively design arts program at ttre 1989 NASAA conference, state srts agency assistant directors and design arts coordinators will visit sites off the tourist beat on Thursday afternoon, November 9. The tour will be hosted by the O.C. Commission on the Arts and Humanities, and Ernironmental knages, Inc. To hegMen awareness of design issues, each participant trill be asked to bring a camera and shoot one roll of film of interesting design details encountered on the tour. The D.C. Design Arts Program wilt process two prints of the photos: one set will go to the photographer as a record of the trip and the other set will be kept by the Design Arts Program as a visual commentary on the sites visited. The bus-photo tour will highlight the history and architecture of some of Washington's neighborhoods, showing the role that arts facilities can play in Community revitalization. The group will visit several sites which have received design arts grants from the DC Commission. After a box lunch at the Anacostia Museum of black history and culture, the group will move to Eastern Market on Capitol Hill, Dance Place in Brookland, Shepherd Park. Adams Morgan, the Studio and Source Theaters on 14th St. The tour will end with a walk down t 7th St. and a reception at the Sumner School where participants will meet members of the D.C. Design Arts Committee. Other design arts activities at the NASAA Conference include a peer group discussion on Wednesday, November 8; breakfast, orientation and a walking tour of PerrnsyNania Avenue, America's main Main Street on Thursday, November 9; and a concurrern panel, "Design and the Rural Landscape," on Friday, November 10 featuring leaders of national and state rural preservation programs. 4 tvei~ uea-yn wr is Program Regional Associates The Design Arts Program has seven reg~nal assoaates who are available for consultatan on desgn issues such as establishurg a design arts program or appying for grants. New Errgknd (CN, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PR, RI, VT) BuH Kavelman 212~t42900 New York State Councl on the Arts 915 Broadway New York, NY 10010 Wddk Atlantic (DE, DC, KY, MD, OH, PA, WV, VA) Tan Walton 202~t55188 Department of Architecture and Planning The Catholic University of America 620 Michigan Ave., NE Washington, DC 20064 Southeast (Al, AR, FL, GA. LA, MS. NC, SC, TN) Douglas Allen 104.8943846 Couege o1 Architecture Georgia Institute of Tec:hnoiogy Atlanta, GA 30332 . South Central (AR, tA, OK M0. TX) Drexei Turner 713527.8101 Rice University School of Architecture P.0. Box t 892 Houston, TX 77251.1692 Southwest (AZ. CO, NM, WY, UT) Roger Schtuntt 602.965.3536 Dept. of Architecture Arizona State University Tempt. AZ 85287 Far West (CA, NV, HW, SAMOA, GUAM, N. MARIANAS) Christine Cinciripini 213253791 140 S. Roxbury - •9 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 NoRhrre•t (AK, ID, MT, OR, WA) Karen Gates Hildt . 2063857039 P.0. Box 277 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Central Midwest (WI, IL, MI, IN) Jell Olswang School of Architecture and lkban Planning University of Wiscorrsm Milwaukee, WI 53201 (ND, SD, MN,10, NE, KS) Stacy Moriarty Boz 3213 45th Ave., S. Minneapolis, MN 55406 uaatyltru w nrrN Publications • Artists in Space: A Handbook for Developing Artists' Studio Spaee. by Jero Nelson. Contact Fora Point Arts Community, 249 A St., Boston, MA 02210. • Design in State Government: M Mtroduction for Legislators, by Anthony J. Radish. Contaa the National Conference of State Legislature5,1050 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2100, Denver, CO 80265. • Protecting America's Historic Countryside. A comprehensive report on the rural preservation activities of the Trust. • Barn Again! A Guide to N•habllffation of Older Farm Buildings. Both available from the National Trust fa Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036. • Guidebook to Selected Projects in Design Education, Massachusetts Council on the Arts and Humanities, 80 Boylston St., 10th floor, Boston, MA 021 t6. • By Design II. Catalogue of NEA Design Arts grants since 1976 by topic. Contact Partners for Livable Places.1429 2t St., Washington, DC 20036. (Also note those pubiications mentioned in the text of this issue.) Videotapes • Cresting Artists' Space.Time t t :00. Produced by the Massachusetts Council on the Arts and Humanities, 80 Boylston Street, 10th floor, Boston, MA 02116. • Washington Grove: Town Wtthin a Forest. Time: 28:50. The story of an historic community in suburban Maryland and its Successful efforts to maintain a special way of I'rfe. Produced by MaguirelReeder, 300 I St., NE, Washington, DC 20002. Price: S90 plus 53.00 shipping and Handling Published through a cooperative ! agreement belrveen the Design Arts Program o(the National Endowment for ttre Arts and: , Environmental Images, Inc. Suite 101 300 Eye Street, NE Washington, DC 20002 1` ff I 8/8 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION (request: Lapin) 8/15 UUCWD/TOV LAND CONTRACT 8/15 NO SMOKING ORDINANCE 2/13 TIME PARAMETERS FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS (request: Rose) 2/20 JOINT MEETING COUNCIL/UMRD 2/27 SATELLITE POST OFFICE (request: Osterfoss) 3/13 PURCHASE PRICE Of PUBLIC PARK- ING SPACES (request: Lapin) 3/13 TRIANGLE OF GREEN. SPACE ADJACENT TO VILLAGE CENTER 3/13 EUROFAIRE/JOHN HORAN-KATES (request: Rose) WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 3/23/90 Page 1 of 1 FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for annexation. RON: Contract in final stages of negotiation. LARRY/SUSAN: Organize study group to examine voluntary options. LARRY/RON: Define time procedure for conduct of meetings. PAT: 1. Develop design/cost structure for construc- tion of public restroom/shower facility/storage at athletic field - return to Council for reprioritization far capital projects. 2. Apply in writing to Council re: ground lease of Booth Creek 9 hole par 3 golf course. LARRY: Prepare amendment to TOU/VMRD agreement re: transfer of mill levy and not holding an election within the required 2 year period of time. RON: Pursue station "in town" and/or increase summer .bus service? KRISTAN/LARRY: .Reconsider pricing to equate to actual cost of constructing new spaces. RON/LARRY: Contact re: possible gift to the Town? LARRY: Contact Pat re: copy of UMRD's contract? Council approval of stock transfer clause inclusion. Petitions are being circulated. Letter on possible soil contamination problems sent to UVCWD. Return letter received. Kent and Ron to meet with Bill George and Ed Drager. Draft ordinance to be submitted to Council for review March 27. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION to be moved up earlier on evening agenda. Existing ordinance is redrafted for consideration April 3. Pat has developed these and Ron has a copy. Proposed cost is naw $150,000. Kent sent letter outlining proposed process to Tim Garton. UMRD is reviewing and will respond after 3/28. Larry and Steve Barwick are working on the amendment. Meeting to be set up with Ernie Chavez. Old ordinance will be resurrected. Will do. Pat has sent to Larry. Contract to be reconsidered April 3. 3/13 ZONING CODE CHANGE I KRISTAN/TOM: Review 15,000 sq. ft. lot size on I Memo in Council packets. single family lots.. PRESENT: Betty Neal B311 Bishop Kevin Cassidy Pam Brandmeyer AGENDA REGULAR MEETING LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 1990 10:00 A.M. SWEARING IN BILL BISHOP 1. Consideration of the Board of the following modifications of premises: a. Red Lion Inn, Inc., dba, the Red Lion Inn Restaurant b. Eagle Restaurant Corp., dba, Cyrano's c. Up the Creek Bar and Grill, Inc., dba, Up the Creek Bar and Grill 2. Consideration of the Board of the following corporate structure changes: a. Antlers Condominium Association 1) Dan Havekost, President - replacing Jerome Darnell 2) Jerome Darnell, Vice-President - replacing Jacque Oakes 3) Jacque Oakes, Secretary - replacing Joe Looper 4) Eric Stromberg, Treasurer - replacing Dan Havekost b. Starr Pizza Slices, Inc., dba, Rocky Rococo Pan Style Pizza 1) John E. Hickey, President - replacing Bart Starr 2) John Hansen, Vice-President - replacing Robert A. Long 3) Robert A. Long, Secretary - remains the same 4) Robert A. Long, Treasurer- where a vacancy had occurred c. K-B Ranch Company, Inc., dba, KB Ranch 1) James J. Scalise, Jr., Secretary - replacing June Sadler 3. Notification of the Board of the following: a. Rafih Benjelloun, dba, Mataam Fez Moroccan Restaurant, to A. Rafih Benjelloun, dba, the Imperial Fez Restaurant/Change of Name Only 4. Consideration of the Board of a manager registration for Lodge Properties, Inc., dba, the Lodge at Vail - Adalberto Mario Stratta. 5. Notification of the Board of recent renewals: a. Charles H. Rosenquist/Richard N. Brown, dba, the General Store b. Steven Satterstrom, Inc., dba, Batch's Restaurant at the Clubhouse c. Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., dba, the Bully III d. Woo's Co., Inc., dba, the May Palace Restaurant 6. Discussion of May 1990 Liquor Authority meeting. 7. Any other matters the Board wishes to discuss. a. Update on Optional Premises local licenses. ABSENT: Steve Simonet t. Colleen McCarthy Continued to 4-11-90. Continued to 4-11-90. Continued to 4-11-90. Unanimously approved. Continued to 4-11-90. Unanimously approved. So notified. Unanimously approved. Unanimously approved. Unanimously approved. Unanimously approved. Unanimously approved. Quorum will be available. Update from Rick Sackbauer w/Batch's Restaurant at the Clubhouse. lowo o(~ai 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2107 office of town attorney March 20, 1990 Mr. Abraham L. Shapiro P. U. Box 1448 Vail, Colorado 81658 RE: Unplatted Vacant Land Lionsridge Filing No. 1 Dear Abe: It appears from your letter that you were given incorrect information from Arlene Montag. Indeed, Mrs. Montag was correct in indicating to you that the land was dedicated to the County of Eagle at the time the Lionsridge Subdivision was platted. However, the annexation map of 1975, and Ordinance No. 26, were both properly recorded on the land records of Eagle County. Further, the annexation procedure which was followed regarding the Lionsridge Subdivision was proper and that land. is clearly a part of the Town of Vail. The roadway dedication you are concerned with which was initially made to the County on the plat map is now considered by law to be a dedicated roadway of the Town of Vail. The Town of Vail has the right by State statute to vacate that roadway, but upon vacation, each side of the roadway beginning with the center line would transfer by operation of law to the adjacent property owners. If you have any questions regarding the actions of the Town of Vail or the law relating to street abandonment, please call. Very truly yo s f.~ S. l~'}Jt Lawre ce A. Eskwith Town Attorney LAE/bsc ,, ~ ~' ~ v ~~ ~~ V ~ ~~ . ~l,`f..C?!Y ! -~ ~_ ~ ~ f~" i ' ~ ~~ ~~~, V' ~~~ Q L~ ~~ /;! ~~ . ~~ a, U ~ ~ a . ~, O - ~ ~ G-,G~J~ /~~ dV PJl/ ~u~ ~'~/~~C{r'tt,.L c, ,rc.~ ~C:c , C ~t.;'~.~ /W t.~-~ ~ ,,~ //~~, l/^jy~,{~(JAn/ o/ ~~~~~/ 4''~C' ~~4'~~ ! 7w„r "~ ice' Y~+~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ I ~ ~ 1 / ~ . ''w ~ ~ U ~~~%~ ~~ ~ "/_ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ate. .~%~u-a- /~ .~c~~~_ r~~~~ ~'~ ~ ~ .~~ 195'. a~.~. ~/,~~~,~'-~-~ ;c .~~'~'~ ~~~~ .~ ~ ~~ F~ ~; t~ I _ ~~D~ r~ p, f~+ I 1 ~GU~~~ ~~~ / - p ~ n _. ~f J~~ '~( i~°~" Mid Ar~~ ~.~'~~ r0'Z~v3'1 /~ ~I~~ ~ C t~ w ~ _, I~ -- :. ,; .. ~ ~ Y ~ ~.-- - a .~ :, r l ~p ~ ,~ -, i.,, - ,. ` '~ l ,` ~. , ._ . ~- ~.~:t1pL -- r ~ w ~ ts, ','IW Kam` ' ` w J ~. '~ ~ _ ,. a.-,~ ___ _ ._. i~i~~~ ~ J .f~M f i ~ . ` .. , /V ~'V. P~ .~..___ ; ---- I! _ - ~ ~'. z ,sA ..~~ ~ -~~ ~ ~a~ 4 M ~-''- ~y ~ ~ ~~ ~`-~ 1 "ten ~. -'~~ ~~j ~ ~t ~~ a~ ~~r },~~~ -~ _ ~{~ ~.;L _ ~ rr ~? -17„'~~6'~'~~ ,~'5~ •r• ~F: t-r ~S i:~ 1 ~ :,F'c ~, -~~ ry, "~~_ ,~ '~'~ +, ~` ~'~V ~r ~ ~{~~. i>. ~~ ;;' ;~~~',1~~~c ~t)~L"..i~~ ` _ ~ ~~ '.max ~ y ,,{i~ ..kY ~~- ~~ J/ t t ~~~ ` `~,jA `~' G" ~ t ~^ j :x~~ t` 4..- _ c~/ \ ~ l'~AY I3 3~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,_f r~~" ,.av 2. _ ,°+~ ,;~~ '~~,~ F'' e^ t~r ~} ~~ ~` ++ ~ '\_\ ~'L.`;~. ~` ~~ 4 4} 4... 'tea _ n ` u~'~ t-, Y ` ~~ t 4 _,.-~-~-~.'r ~~ ; ,e ~~(~ a ~' {~, ~ ~ - ` ~ l t ~' - _ _~ ' r- p ,. v2 ~{ ~ n ~ '~' ~`~ _ i Y K ., ~- w ~ ~ _ . r _~ ~~ ~ ~ t _ i Y - a a ~" .^~ ° Imo/ ;fir ~ ,y * i ~.. ,~ _ l 3 s,: sR~• ~ t" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-.. ~d"a ~~fi'L• ~~ f ~ ~--t . ~f~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~..: _ `I ,rnr `~ _ r~ r, f ~ ~ ~ ~7°a ~ ~ ,~~~ ~ . n z ~_. :; .`... Abstract of Assessments 1988 a ~ o d ° ° ~ r T M M O O 40 ~ aD _ O~ ~ M TAXING r ~ M c4 r~ m o~ o N r m ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ao ~ r ~ ~- ~ ~ v m JURISDICTIONS ° M _q 8v ~ ~ r m m~ rn ~ o N c7 M~ v r~ ~ ~ o ~ m? o? N ~ M~ <? ,n ~- ~ r m~ u~ m ~ tD ro~ rn v o 0 o M V v O Q O m O m O m O m O! 0< 0 I~ 0~ O O ~ O e- O i~ ~ r ~ ~ 0~ NO U N r' N" N V N C ~ ~ M~ M~ M r M ~ V .- O ~ O V V r O m O m O m O m O W O LLJ O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O ow oC'3 oC7 oC7 0~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ om om om om o¢ TOTALS 85.471 80.106 70.180 63.945 70.374 78.388 72.092 70.823 51.354 68.261 66.953 50.331 54.890 78.194 50.593 50.787 65.202 70.259 47.138 50.008 67.245 124.879 49.983 67.220 54.247 74.121 64.195 64.838 85.062 74.089 ,~.~rr. ~ a 55,0 o ~.:~ .~ ~.~c ~ ~,~~a ~ i s-. , - . ~, ~ ~ 3,::5 :3 .:5~0 ~ ..~ ~ ~a ..~ . ~ ~.t;0u ~ - ~ 0.550 9.55.E '~ .,0- ~.s59 9.559 9855 dr",5., i 3 SS: 3.6:;9 9.559 9.555 ..0.. ~ 9.55a ..33 9.559 ~~ ~~. ~_~~ 1.500 ~ _.___ V VvV 1.500 i _.~__ V vVV ~ V~vJV ~ 1 1.5001 ?.500: ~~ I 1500 ~~ 1.500 I 7.500 I 1.5001 1.500 7.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 '~ 1.500 11.500 1.500 J .,; ! 1.500 l 1.500 t, a alt '_ ~ ~n ~ 1 94d 1 P44 i 1..944 x.944 1.944 I 1.944 I I ~ ~ ~ ~i I 7.944 '~ i,.,,. '~ 1 ~ _. ~~1 ~~ ~.., ~ _:.3 -,i~ 4.913 4.913 4.913 491 ' ~~ i ~: ~ s i--~ i- i ~i 4.913 4.913 4.913 4913 ~ 4913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.91; ~ r ~ U ,t _. RF 5C.1 ~ "a",~. _ ~~ I ~ .'3 _~ 29 '~ ?9.'_1 ~ _~ 3...~ I _ '~ 29 _. ~ ..._ .. 29 3 " 3'J ' ' ~. ~ _..,~ ~..,~ _, - - ?9.327 Srri, t~i ~ =F ~ J ~1 '.. ~ ~ -. ~ 47.33f I - Di,tnct JT- ~ .~,, 33`r,r - --' ' 1 , E3~a11. :.~ ~ ~. ~.~1? ~ ..~1~ ll I I, S.U14 i T .. ~n ' . ~ ~ i . i ~ ~.'Psurr T a.,, ,; ~ -- I i ~ 1 i I ~ i 3 135 ~ - _ ~ - __ ~ Mn,~.ir ~, ~ :. ~,,. ~. ~~ i '1.251 Fc.rir~i T,,,. i - - ~ I ~ ~ ~ '~ ', ~ 65.097 V~ ~ .1ai H r,,,r,,,.: I~ '~ I ~' ~ ~ ~ _ '. )~_'.F, a i5 _. +n, c i, 6 -'-. ~ ,. ~. i ..=-: 'x.643 ~,.~ ~. i ~.,~, i Mi~u i~r, -n Ni.-. Y. iii ~ ~ I ~i. 25 ~ 0.025 ! 0 0.0251 0.025 ~ Ba ~ ~ i ., - ,,, - ~ o-- _ ~ __ _ - _ - ___. ,~t=~ ~,.1I Firr: ~ r ~~ I. ~, i 4.5`•9 4.x,59 a 5n~1 ~, - 4.559 , G.i. r Arrowhead Metro. i Avon Metro. ~ 1 _ ~ t ,s,-~r ~: r.:~F h1~tr;. ~. i ' i ~ ~ Bel i i ~ ~ - _ - - ~ __ -I . I _ - ~... _ ' ~ ~auc .1r,nu Eagle-Vail Metre. i 17.237 ~ 17.237 c;iwartls Metro. I Mid Valley Metro. i I i ~ ~ '. a( t,i ~. I.,.. F, , I i ' i ' ^r'~ F Co. P~r i ~ f ~~ i ~ I , 11 -(i .15 ! 150 i . i C.14ii _ ~ _ _.-. __ -- _ ~ ~ i I I I 3.141 ~~ ~ I I i 0,709 0.709 0.7^^ I 0.709 Q709 i - i ~ V .. - I -..~ i 2.161 2.161 2.1 2.161 2.161 R, lcii`t ,t 5,~~ `~ ~ ~. ~l ~'i - ~ - - ~ - i - i _ r fig vai :', ~_ ~~ I ~. Pa I1 V r ~.:~~r.~. ~ u. w I _ 5 194 ~2.~94 t-194 I !). L`~s ~, '. ~'~ 0.194 ~ ~ ', ~ 0.194 bt41 .. 1.944 1.944 4.913 4.913 4 913 4.913 2~ L7 ?9.327 47.330 I a " - I _'.1,. ~IIh I I i 0.643 5 0.709 '"~7r'9 2.161 ~.Ili1 J e. tli:er 4°~ater Cons. 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 O.~t-19 'i 0.449 7 449 ~ ;.a~.9 0-549 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ O.A49 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 r 0.449 0.449 { 0.449 VVI ..i Ja1P~ I ~ i ~ ,. ,n F'. ~ ~ ...I'.., i i it ~~'ll ~~I~~.'f Tlt'1. :~J n1 L?f i ~. ~ I, i fall Valle Cons. Wa er y t i I i tali Village West Water I ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ c F 1. E, ~ =r. Hs[: 7 9F5 ~i ~i d75 1 ,.. '~ 1 _-. ~.,._ ii', :,,= ~.. ~ E.i ~„ I .i. ~ 1 ~.1 -~4i. 14,E 1 ~ TOTAL X54'1 30 _ i rr J- ~'~S ~B, J4F ]-3I417r o.72.. .. ..354 ,_,1 ~0~,-1~.~~~13:, ~ -: n9S~ x134 ~'~~"~+, ~G ~_ Jb`a~ ~ ~ ,7d~:,+9n:b~ `:.y ':11~ 7 c ~ I 1-St.`r 65 155 6,- I~ F5 9~•2 75. ~.d9 m rn ~ c~ ~ COUNTY ASSESSOR m ~ G.J. (Jody) Caruthers B 449 0 ~ ox rn o~ COUNTY CLERK. ~ ~ n Johnnette Phillips o ~ o Box 537 0o cfl J COUNTY TREASURER ~'`' 1 ,~ Mary E. Walker ,,,~ Box 479 COUNTY SHERIFF (/~ A. J. Johnson (/~ Box 359 ['rJ COUNTY SURVEYOR ~ James Kunkel COUNTY CORONER Donna Meineke COUNTY COMMISSIONERS George (Bud) Gates Richard L. Gustafson Donald H. Welch Box 850 COUNTY SEAT Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (303) 328-7311 ABSTRACT OF ASSESSMENTS EAGLE CO(1I`ITY COLORADO FOR THE YEAR 1989 Toll Free Numbers: From Basalt/EI Jebel: (303) 927-3823 From Vail/Avon: (303) 949-5257 As Approved By The County Board of Equalization State Division of Property Taxation The State Board of Equalization TAXING AREAS M r m m~ a s 07 a ~ ro mn a s O W ~ ~ ar OQ ~ '9 a m~ a~ O tl1 a ry' a U O S r ~ N Oq O W o m tf1 O O O m m r ~ Nco O O~ O W o ~ N O r O Q1 a o a~ m W O>> O> ~ °J m my N~ O W O a r ~ rr mof O O U a ~ r mr Npj O O W a ~ r moi mn O O W a r o°' m r O> O> m ~ cb ma O O 1 " r N01 m~? O- O J r m m M m~ O D m m ~ as m O W O Q r 1m m~ O O Q ~ oo mN O O= M r mN D O= r m mO r O Q a ~ rr ^On O U D m Nn rrp O O m ~ ~ Mq rvJ O O= m v r N> rw O O Q ~ m m~ r O U O _I ~ ~ m a O Q O J m m m N my Or O 1 n r ~ ~ m= O m O 1 m ~ ~ v r m j OU O 1 M r ro ~ oQ .~ J 0 1 r ~ ro ~a r O~ ~ ro v r c~3 "] O J ~ ~ ~ m? r p~ N r m m r° '- O 1 ~ ~ a N¢ N J O 1 ~ °' co v m3 N~ D 1 M ~ ~ ~ a ~~ N j O U N W a r 3 N 1 p U , r m m ° ryr p~ 56723 60.348 82.601 i 76.366 ~ 49.688 i 55.625 56.107 69.775 ?2.403 53.838 72.645 54.743 54 a81 ~ 59.040 58.3971 51.538 55.193 66.483 73.983 71.113 i 51.263 42113 71219 65.418 61.268 80.374 54.133 91.326 61.052 60.108 69.455 57824 60.321 55.177 72.340 74.624 61.654 56.920 56.549 60.139 62.468 61.851 56.469 9 55~ I ~.3ob °_;53 f <<: J, '.,.,d 9x59 «.~ 9..,.,3 3.55 - . ~ n 955., a ::a 1 ~..,~., ~ ..:.;~ .,..,..., - 4559 I ; c~,c ~.,.,~ 9.559 , ~.~.~ J~yJU ~ -~~~ .,.~~., o ., ~: ~ ~,...,.., 9,559 9.559 4c, 9.5..~ a . ~:,; s~.i ~ 9.~ a .5y ~~ ,... ..559 ~~ °.5c -._-- y -.54 4 55o 0 0,9 ~ °~SI 7 ,5~.1 ~, ,5a ~~ 9 F~59 3.554 a G9d a.55g a 5`3 :1.`,59 4553 9.p59 _._-- .-- -- - ._-- -.-- Y.500 ~ 913 4 1500 4 913 1.500 913 4 1.500 ~ ~ 4 973 ~ 1.500 4 913 I 1.5 00 913 4 1.944 913 4 1.500 4 913 1.944 4 913 1.500 4.913 1.500 4.913 1.500 ~ 4.913 1.500 4.913 1.500 4.913 1.500 ! 4913 1.500 49'3 1.500 4.913 1.500 ' ~ i - 1.500 -gin 1.500 ~'.l ~ 1.500 4.913 1.500 4.913 1.500 4.913 1.500 ~ 4.913 1.500 4.913 ~ 1.9 4.91 ~ 1 ~: 500 ~1.~ai1 4.913 i 7.500 4.913 L500 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4~~ ~ 4 ~1' 1 I ~ '+' -:~v. a.11a . 29.327 . 29.327 . . 1~7 ~ ~ . ~ 2y. ~- ~ . .9.-~2? . :0.127 . . 29.327 . 29.327 ~ ^" ""' 29.327 29.32 ~ I 29.9_ ~ ""~'~ I ''0 ~ ^^ ^~27 <. ,. ~ ~.3.a.: I ~ ~~' ~ _ ^^ 7 ^"',^'I ^9.327 29.327 22'0' I ~ 1 29.321 29327 __.. .29,327 29.321 29.327 29.327 29'2' 29327 29.327 29,327 29327 23 .. 23.+27 ~93~ i ^9.'t2' 2`!.32?~ 29.J27 _ _.~ ~ I - -_ - 47-330 -- _.. 47.330 -. ! -___ ' ._ ~ a' 330 ~ ~~~ 24.106 ~i 24.106 : '.106 i i ~ I 8.014 ~, I ~ I I ~' ~ ~ __. _... ~ __._ _- _ ... _- __. - _ __.. _- -. _. _.. '~. ~' r ~ 6.431 6.431 fi.431 6.431 i i 1 a 6.431 _. _ 0.905 '; ~ 0.905 0.905 ~ ~' 643 0 ' 0.643 Q643 0.025 . ~ ~ ~ _ _. 0.025 ~ O.D25 ... __ ~ _ _- - ~ _ _ 0 0.025 uLS... - 0.025 - 0 ,: ~ 0.025 f -- 0.0? ~~_5 ~' x,.025 2~ O.D25 ~ 0 L5 ~. - "0' 1 2`, - r = r _ _ _ _ _. _ _ -. _ 5.985 4.559 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.559 ~ 4.559 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 10.675 10.675 24.000 24.000 ~ ~ ~~, I. ~ ~ - 1 11.382 - ( -- -- I _ ~ i 15.220 .... _.. ___ _. __ _ 26.383 ~ ~. ~ ~ 1...p: '~.~.~ i4.~u_ ~ 17.237 , 1 6.572 ~ 18.512 18.512 '~~. ~ 10.000 ~ ' ~ 1530 ~ ~~ t530 _ _ 1 530 1.530 1.530 1.530 1 1 i ..', ~ "~: L`~ ~ i oou i.aau thou, i.,-~. ~__. . _ 4.150 _. _ -.. __. _ __ 4.150 ~_ _, ~ -. 4150 4.150 _ 4.150 4.150 - 4.150 - 4.150 . }.. _. ~ 4.150 . ~ - _ 4,150 ~ _-- 4.150 - -- 4.150 ~ . i ~ ~ 1.718 i i I 1.308 f I ~ 0.709 ~ 0,109 i 0.709 ~ ~ 0709 0.709 0.709 i ~ 0.709 0.709 0.709 Q70~ " 7[~? 0.704 0.709 0 709 0.7no I n ~Og n 709 ~ 9.709 ~ ~Og 0 704 i 9 709 ~ 0 X09 l ~ 2.161 ~ 2.161 ' 2 16. 2 161 2.161 2.161 2.161 2 161 2161 i ~' ' 2.161 i 2 161 i i ~' i-'~ . I I f ~ ~ ~ 0.194 0.194 i 0.194 'i 1 ~ 2.315 10.449 G.+a'd 0.449 0.449 OA49 0.449 O.A49 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~~ 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 OA49 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0,449 0.449 ~ 0.449 ~ D,449 ~ 0.449 ~ i--a9 0.e49 0,449 0,449 ~ 0.449 0 449 ~I 0 a4N 4.864 I ~ _ ~ - } _ ~ __~ ~ ~ - 13.939 ~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ 4.027 ! :~ii7 ~'~:'.' ~I 3.830 ~ '~i I 3.830 ' i '. ~, O~.tf3D ~ 1.355 ~ I ~ ~ 1.355 ~ 1.355 1.355 1.355 1.355 1.355 ~ "_ ~ - i '` ~ '~ 1 '~`~~ ~ 1. 105 _.284 'i 4 i 'Oa ~I ~ ~, 'i 0.000 1 0 000 ~ ~ 1 1.385 1. 6.. I 1 ~~5 ~ ~ , n ~ ~ -~-- 1.365 I - -... - - - ~- ~ ~ , 1 -- 1.38', ~ ~ ~ ~ hi -- 1.385 1.365 1 385 ~ - 1,365 ~ 1.385 ~ 1.3b5 - 1.365 _ _ 1.365 1.385 _ 1.365 1.385 1.366 1 X05 1 3 1 36. t3 , 1.365 7 OR.: i,.Bfi b5 ~ t3E5 1.365 ,~,.. ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ 3.9-~ 3940 3.940 3.94C ~'~ ~ 3 4 - .,, Sr ~ .i.34~, - ,.. , od 801 -... n, F i . ~ ~J nii~-. i .,_ Nn.,~, -..: r . ,.~ ,; „ G., ,,, ,~ ,° , ~ . ,,,~. F 1 ~. -„ ~ ,4_:.... ~ ..I ;._ . .:1 s.i , ~ , .., ,. ~. ~' ; : ,_: ~ ~.,. L_ ,. i _ , ,., .. ;, ±, ~ 1 ii ~, ~ i ~ ~ _ ; 11 ~~ - a :, ~ 50.18 n., ya. ' ..~., `,~ 1 ;IL52 ~ r ~ 32p 1.56.541 ~ ~ ;.4 ~ 5r'' - r f. _4"!S _1 85, - ~ i n 7 r,i'i i i' h: 4`5 15 r'1 i 1~. 27 ~ _,4_. ~h .J ,[ 6, x177 2' ~_. ~ _~ ? .,a~ li ~4.b2e G? 65a GENERAL INFORMATION COUNTY TAX ITEMIZED The property tax bill, which you receive each January, IS NO OF ACRES VALUATION the result of the assessment process. This assessment . RESIDENTIAL VALUATION process generates revenue through property taxes. Tax NEAREST TEN ooLLARS LEVY REVENUE (DOLLARS) bills are collected to pay for local government services. Unlmproved and Improved Land ....... .............. .... $132,115,780 COUNTY PURPOSES Improvements ...................... .............. ......231,714,030 Personal Property ................... .............. ........4,447,050 General $567,391,930 6.020 $3,415,699 Contingency 567,391,930 .253 143,550 The county assessor's duty is to value property, both TOTAL .:.......:.................. .............. ......368,276,860 Road and Bridge 567,391,930 2.049 1.,162,586 property tax purposes. (Public real and personal, for Pumic Welfare 587,391,930 .337 .191,211 . utilities are valued by the State Division of Property Tax• COMMERCIAL capital Expenditures 5s7,391s3o .243 137,876 ation). Her primary responsibility is to determine an Retirement 567,391,930 .262 148,657 equitable value for your property so that you pay only Unimproved and Improved Land ....... .............. .......57,822,780 msuraneeFund county Library 5x7,391,930 254,665,610 .395 1.500 224,120 381,998. your fair share of the taxes. Improvements :..................... .............. .......e7,7a6,o1o Basalt Library 29,491,00D 1.944. 57,331 Personal Property ................... .............. .......23,300,170 INCORPORATED TOW NS TOTAL ............................ .............. ......168,870,960 Once the value is established, taxing jurisdictions utilize Avon $ 35,344,450 24.106 852,013 the value to determine their mill levies. The result is your INDUSTRIAL Basalt 7,707,140 8.014 61,765 tax bill. The entire process takes a full year to ac. Eagle 11,324sso 7x13 ass12 COmpIISh. Unlmproved andlmprovedLand ....... .............. .........235,030 Gypsum 5,875,D40 9.635 54,679 Improvements ...................... .............. ........1,360,000 Mlnturn 4,775,890 20.261 96,777 Radcliff 811,910 65.097 52,853 Personal Property ................... .............. ......... 104,930 Vall 283,235,320 6.431 1,821,488 THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE IS IN NOWAY TOTAL ............................. ............. ........1,699,960 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT AND SERVICE DISTRICTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAX LEVIES. AGRICULTURAL Arrowhead Metropolitan $ tos46,6o0 24.000 262,7x7 Avon Metropolitan 34,104,050 11.362 388,172 Irrigated Land ....................... ...7,233.. , .. .........597,390 Basalt & Rural Fire 29,18Q700 5.985 174,647 Meadow Hay Land ................... ..11,966 ..... .........390,980 Basalt Sanitation 7,657,280 1.718 13,155 PROPERTY TAXES PAY FOR LOCAL SERVICES Grazing Land ....................... ..132,715..... .........627,420 Basalt Water Conservancy 26,835,230 .194 5,206 OtherAg.Land ...................... ......13 ..... .......... 10 430 Beaver Creek Metropolitan 72,325,870 35.079 2,537,12D YOUR TAX MONEY SUPPORTS AND PROVIDES FOR , Bellyache Ridge Metro. 1,398,430 15.220 21,254 THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: Im ravements ...................:... P ............. ........2,138,540 Berry creek Metropolitan 12,413,130 26.383 327,495 $Ch001S TOTAL ........... 3 764 760 Bighorn Water 9,448,090 2.315 21,872 . ................. ............. ........ , , Cascade Village Metro. 18,584,780 14.518 269,777 POIICe ~ Fire Pr0teC110n Cedar Hill Cemetery Assoc. 13,929,970 .905 12,607 County & City Road Construction & Maintenance NATURAL RESOURCES Colorado Rverconserv. 5s7,3sis3o .449 254,759 Water & Sewer Lines Eagle Cemetery 18,778,120 .643 12,074 Public Libraries Earth and Stone ..................... .....909..... .........118,540 Eagle Co.Emerg.Serv.Ho. 503,183,160 1.385 686,845 Severed Minerallnterests ............. .....388 .,... .............110 Ea le-Vail Metro olitan 9 p 30,203,650 17237 520,820 Recreation & Parks Improvements ...................... .............. ..........23 220 Eagle Sanitation 11,162,270 1.308 14,600 Public Health Services & Welfare & Other Social , Edwards Metropolitan 7,543,570 18.512 139,647 $eNICeS Personal Property ................... .............. ..........90,920 Gore Valley Water 17,378,970 4.664 81,056 TOTAL Greater Eagle Fire Prot. 15,858,19D 4.558 72,284 Property Taxes DO NOT support any State Services. ............................. .............. .........232,790 GYPsum Fire 9,585,910 10.675 102,329 Gypsum sanitation 5,675,040 3.141 17,825 SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT ROLL Lake Creek Meadows Water 2,532,420 13.939 35,296 Lions Ridge Water 13,659,430 4.027 55,007 Land ............................... ............. ......191,918,460 Mld-Valley Metropolitan 4,800,050 10.000 48,001 1989 taxes are due January 1 1990 Improvements ....................... .............. .....322,983,800 Mlnturn Cemetery Assoc. 313,844,500 .025 7,848 , . Personal Property .................... .............. .......27,943,070 Redcliti Water & Sanlt. 811,910 12.669 10,286 First half of taxes become delinquent on March 1, 1990. U er Ea le Valle pp g y Sanit. 266,981,830 2.161 576,948 S1ateAssessed ...................... .............. ......24,546,600 Upper E.V.Consolid.San. 467,601,130 .709 331,529 Second half of taxes become delinquent on August 1, 1990. vail intermountain Water 7,332,080 3.830 2a,oe2 NO interest is charged TOTAL TAXABLE PROPERTY .. ............. ......587,391,930 Vail Metropolitan Rec. 285,116,61D 1.530 436,227 if taxes are paid in full before May 1, 1990. Vail Valley Consol, Water 285,904,980 1.355 367,401 Exempt Properties ................... .............. ...... 93,434,860 Vail Village West Water 19,338,590 2284 44,189 Vail Water 218,747,820 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY ................... ............. . ...660,826,790 Vall Water & Sanitation 200,619,300 .886 177,749 West Eagle Co. Ambl. 34,479,120 3.940 135,830 SUMMARY OF TAXES western Eagle County This abstract is prepared for you by the Assessor's Of• Metropoltan Rec. oist. 4a,27s,37o a.15o 163,747 fice. Anyone interested may have a free copy by apply Real Property ........................ ............. .....$33,885,136 ing in person or by mail. We have a permanent mailing Personal Property .................... .............. .......1,742,269 SCHOOL DISTRICTS list and if you would like a copy each year, notify us and Mobile Homes ....................... .............. ........154,643 REFiOJ 537,134,700 29.327 15,752,549 we will place your name on the list. Pobricutunies ....................... .............. .......1,512,337 RE-1J 29,735,950 47.330 1,407,402 1 JT 521,280 33.568 17,498 TOTALREVENUETOBECOLLECTEO ... .............. ......37,294,385 Colorado Mtn. Jr. College 567,391,930 4.913 2,787,597