HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-03-27 Support Documentation Town Council Work Sessioni
_-Y,~,C~-~ ~_
UAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 1990
12:00 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Affordable Housing Focus Interview with Town Council and
Planning and Environmental Commission
2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report
3. Design Review Board Report
4. Discussion of Capital Projects Priorities
5. Review of Draft Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1990, an ordinance
repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.32 of Title 8 of the
Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to expand, strengthen, and
clarify Code provisions relating to smoking in public places and
places of employment.
6. information Update
7. Other
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 1990
12:00 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
12:00
2:00
Kristan Pritz
2:05
Mike Mollica
1. Affordable Housing Focus Interview with Town Council and
Planning and Environmental Commission
Action Requested of Council: Discuss various alternatives
for encouraging affordable housing within Vail.
2. Planning and Environmental Commission Report
3. Design Review Board Report
2:10 4. Discussion of Capital Projects Priorities
Steve Barwick
Action Requested of Council: Finalize priorities for 1990
capital projects.
Background Rationale: Staff will present a recommended list
of capital projects for 1990. These projects are to be
funded from both the Capital Projects Fund and the Real
Estate Transfer Tax Fund.
3:10 5. Review of Draft No Smoking Ordinance
Susan Scanlan
Larry Eskwith Action Requested of Council: Discuss changes to the
Kristan Pritz ordinance.
3:35 6. Information Update
Ron Phillips
3:40 7. Other
town 0
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303)479-2138
(303)479-2139
MEMORANDUM
office of community development
T0: Vail Town Council and Planning and Environmental
Commission
FROM: .Community Development Department
DATE: March 27, 1990
SUBJECT: Preliminary Alternatives for Town of Vail affordable
Housing.
The consultant and planning staff have meet with employers,
developers, and employees to discuss the preliminary concepts out-
lined in the attached memo. The memo is only a draft document.
The primary purpose of the list of alternatives is to stimulate
discussion at the joint work session. Comments from the council
and planning commission as well as developers, employers and
employees will then be compiled and used to refine the
alternatives. Additional ideas brought up in the focus groups will
also be added to the list of alternatives.
At Tuesdays joint work session, the consultant and planning staff
will led a focus group which will allow ,council members and
commissioners to view their personal opinions on the alternatives.
ROSALI REMMEN CARES [ c PC T e
:: ~ ~ E < _ T _ E _ .
___.c_ _
REGULATION ALTERNATIVES:
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS
L ~ts for employers and residential developers to set aside units for low
d/or moderate income residents/employees.
A -Eligibility
Residential developers of 5 or more units need to allocate at least 20 percent of
their units to low or moderate income employees for rent only.
visions:
• Can be on-site i~uorporated as part of development Plan or off-site, if
approved by Town of Vail PEC and/or Town Council. If off-site,
specifics, site plan and approval of Eagle County or applicable local
j~~ diction must be received and documented prior to issuance. of any
b ding permits.
• Must be newly constructed units; cannot be met by "reserving long term
rental units" out of existing housing stock, unless exceptional dreumstances
„ „
warrant variance due to hardship or documented period of excess supply
of units existing (criteria to be established).
• In establishing number of units required, applicant rounds to nearest
whole number if units will be constructed, i.e. 5-7 units require 1
affordable unit, 8-12 units require 2 affordable units, etc.
• Applicant can elect to pa to Town of Vail Housing Authority (or other
assigned entity) a fee in lieu of construction of said affordable housing.
The fee would be deposited into an account allocated exclusively for
provision of low/moderate income housing by Town of Vail. Fee will be
calculated on the basis of 525,000 per unit, with fractional units calculated.
• Town of Vail will define maximum rent levels which can be charged for
each unit (variation by size of unit, ~ of bedrooms, etc.) based upon
formula related to median income, adjusted annually. Developer must
agree to maintain designated units under "affordable housing rnteria
control" thmugh covenants which will remain in force for a minimum of
Years.
• Once constructed, units can be "transferred" to other locations upon
approval of Town of Vail, i.e. a unit constructed at one location may be
converted to market rent or short termed if at least a comparable quality
unit is provided at an alternate location either within the development or
off the site.
~i
N ARES u ~ 1 -~ ti--~ '
ROSALL REMME C
• The provision applies to all qualifying developments. No variances or
waivers are available. Town may enact a provision which sets up a
criterion such as a documentable vacancy rate to affordable housing units
of 10 percent or greater, on an annual basis, that applicant can defer
construction of units until such time as vacancy rate dips below 10
percent, at -which time units are required to be constructed. This
provision, if elected by developer, will be treated as a developer or
subdivision aggrreement, with a formal bond or acceptable letter of aedit
deposited, subject to call by Town of Vail.
II. Requirements of "employers" who wish to construct new square .footage dther
through expansion of existing facilities or through free standing, independent
structures, to set aside/construct low and/or moderate income "employee"
housing which represents at least 20 percent of the direct employment generated
by the development.
Provisions:
• Can be on-site or off-site, same as Residential Development requirements.
• Can utilize in lieu of payment, same as Residential Development.
• Requirement applies only to amount of new construction approved; cannot
be retroactively applied to portions of development already constructed.
• Renovation of existing square footage does not require new affordable
housing; only increase in gross square footage or new "independent"
construction applies.
• Criteria for office and retaff square footage, lodging and resort/recreational
facilities will be developed to calculate the minimum new employee
defuution For example:
- Office -one per 350 square feet
- Retail -one per 300 square feet
- Lodging -one per three rooms
- Resort - if fadlities such as restaurant, administrative, etc.
utilize above criteria. If expansion on mountain, Le. new
lifts and trails, then special calculation to be considered
through negotiation as part of approval process.
• Employers can provide "for-rent housing only" which they will manage
and control New housing, not control of existing units.
2
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
Criteria will be utilized to relate numbers of employees to number of
bedrooms provided, i.e. 1.2 employees per bedroom in standard units, 2
employees per bedroom in dormitory/group housing facilities.
As with residential development requirements, during periods of above
10°6 vacancy rates, deferral of obligations combined with bonding
requirements subject to "call" by Town is permitted.
• Criteria will be established to describe the threshold of commercial
expansion/new construction which will trigger the employee housing
requirement. One possibility is any expansion in excess of 5 percent of
the existing square footage or any new facility of 2500 square feet or
greater.
III. Special provisions to be made available as part of the SDD to anyone seeking
increases in density or expansion of uses permitted by right.. These provisions
apply only in zones where SDD are also permitted.
The purpose of this section is to encourage, within reasonable standards and
parameters, the production of affordable employee housing units in excess of the
20 percent required of .all development above a certain threshold size.
Provisions:
Incorporate in 18.40.050 -
Submittal Requirements:
13) A plan which describes the method by which the applicant will meet
the overall housing needs of the employees being generated by the
development. Incorporated into this document is a description of the
number and classification of seasonal and year-round employees projected
by season, by year.
Applicant will state what specific commitments are being made either
through on- and/or off-site construction to house employees in excess of
the standard ZO percent normally required.
• Insert a new section after 18.40.090 -
Increase in density beyond that permitted 'by right" m the underlvine
zone.
There are two types of developments envisioned related to this section.
One entails an employee housing project, exclusively, which is located m
either a residential or a commercial zone. The second involves amixed-
use or commercial-oriented development, typically located in an underlying
commercial area. With regard to the first example, the employee housing
development, we would suggest the following:
3
_,
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
So song as the design criteria defined in 18.40.080 and the criteria (perhaps
refined) related to benefit to the Town outweighing adverse impacts
contained within 18.40.090 can be demonstrated to have been met,
maximum density increase beyond that normally permitted in the
underlying zoning shall be defined.
One of the criteria to be utilized in that derision is the affordable housing
plan committed as part of the development.
Each ear the Town would formally ado tan affordable housing policy
which establishes a prioritization of affordable housing needs for the
community. For example, the Town might initially state that housing
facilities for "single" seasonal employees represents the most critical need
in the community, with rental housing for middle income families (2-3
bedrooms), employed on a year-mund basis as the second priority. Rental
levels of $250 per month per person for seasonal employees and $600-$750
per month for 2-3 bedroom family housing might be established as part of
that policy.
The housing plan submitted as part of the SDD application for the
employee housing project would be reviewed in the context of the
pertinent housing policy.
Based upon the quality of the application, including review of all aspects
of the design and affordable housing criteria, as well as the applicable
Land Use Plan standards, the applicant would be eligible to receive an
increase in GRFA and/or number of dwelling units of up to 25 percent
beyond that which is permitted within the underlying zoning.
In the instance of an SDD application involving amixed-use or a
commercial pmject in order for any increase in density beyond. that
permitted by the underlying zoning to be approved, a corresponding
finding that the applicant is complying with the "targeted" affordable
housing plan in a manner which is eater than normally required must
be made by the approving board. As in the case of all SDD applications,
the overall design criteria and other related criteria for approval must be
met in addition to the new affordable housing plan component.
It is recognized that certain areas of the Town such as portions of Vail
Village do not allow additional increases in density beyond that permitted
by the underlying zoning. The requirements of these particular areas shall
not be modified by this provision.
4
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
IV. Caretaker Units
Provisions:
• Allowed in single-family, primary/secondary, duplex and hillside
residential zone districts.
• 500 s.f. maximum, including kitchen.
• One parking space paved.
• ~ence must beowner-occupied. ~ ~'~ N"~~
'1
• Occupancy of accessory unit must not exceed two people.
• The property must meet all zoning standards for parking, landscaping,
minimum lot size, etc.
• Accessory unit must be located within the existing unit. Minor
conversions on the exterior are allowed as long as all zoning standards are
met. Setback variances and height variances discouraged.
• Accessory unit is incidental to primary use of property as a single or
duplex residence.
• Notice shall be given to adjacent property. owners.
• Accessory unit may not be subdivided or sold separately. Unit may not
be short-term rented.
• Accessory unit is permanently designated as a long-term rental to local
(see enclosed section on employee-restncted units from zoning code).
• Accessory unit agreement is signed by owner and TOV. Agreement is
recorded as County.
• Process for review is similar to a home occupation permit or perhaps
conditional use permit.
Additional Provisions:
• The community development department shall find that the granting of the
exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property th the area in which the subject property is situated.
• No variances for setbacks, height, parking, site coverage or landscaping,
site development or gross residential floor area would be approved unless
5
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
the granting of such a variance benefits the visual appearance of the site
and surrounding area.
• The architectural design of the structure and the materials and colors must
be visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding sites and
structures, and must not unnecessarily block scenic views from existing
buildings.
• Access to the secondary unit must not adversely affect the privacy of
adjacent structures.
• The applicant must demonstrate that the site has the ability to double its
capacity for handling trash and outdoor storage.
• An application for the second unit, containing the following information,
must be submitted to the community development department for their
review.
- Name of applicant and address
- Name of applicant's representative (if any)
- Authorization of property owner
- Location of the property for which the proposal is made
- A .fee of $100 plus an amount equal to the then-current first lass
postage rate for each property owner to be notified hereunder
- A list of the names of the owners of all property adjacent to the
subject property and their addresses for the purpose of notification.
• The proposed plan and all required materials must be submitted to the
design review board at their regularly scheduled meeting for their review
and approval.
• The applicant shall agree in writing:
- That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold, transferred or
conveyed separately from the primary unit for a period of not more
~~~~~~ than 20 years and the lift of Trent Ruder from the date that the
certificate of occupancy is issued for said second unit.
- That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be leased or rented for
any period of less than 30 consecutive days, and that if it shall be
rented it shall be rented only to tenant who are full-time employees
in the Upper Eagle Valley. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be
deemed to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Qiff, Gilman,
Eagle-Vail and Avon and their surrounding areas. A full-time
employee is a person who works an average of 30 hours per week.
6
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
That the accessory dwelling unit shall not be divided into any form
of time-shares, interval ownership or fractional fee.
- That a declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be filed of
record in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder in a
form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town
to ensure that the restrictions herein shall run with the land.
A - An appeal to the planning commission from a decision of the community
development department may be made by the applicant, adjacent property
owners, or the Town manager. The planning commission can also call up such
decisions by a majority vote of those commission members present.
B -For all appeals, the appeal must be Sled in writing within 10 days following
the decision or the derision must be called up by the planning commission at
their next regularly scheduled meeting.
C • The planning commission shall hear the appeal within 30 days of its being
filed or called up, with a possible 30-day extension if the commission Suds that
there is insufficient information.
D -The decision of the community development department shall become final
after the time for such an appeal or call-up is exhausted within any formal
appeal
V. Town of Vail Demonstration Housing Project.
Support has been expressed by several focus group partiespants that, in addition
to amendments in the Zoning Code such as those outlined above, the Town
should move forward with a demonstration project involving public/private
cooperation.
This program would involve the Town either utilizing an appropriate site which
it currently owns or acquiring a new site for the purpose of constructing an
employee housing pmject targeted primarily for seasonal residents.
Under this concept, the Town would be responsible for designing and
constructing the project. It would "pre-sell" the units to local businesses and
companies on some criteria. Those businesses would then utilize the units they
purchase for housing eligible employees in need. The Town itself could also be a
buyer of a certain number of the units. In effect, the Town would be the agent.
responsible for putting the project together, with the costs shared by the
participating businesses. Various alternatives could be utilized for ongoing
management responsibilities. Covenants would be written to ensure long-term
compliance with affordable housing restrictions.
7
't
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
The Town, through creation of a Housing Authority, could borrow money at
below private market interest rates, with revenues guaranteed by the project
participants, or other funding mechanisms could be established. As one
alternative, the Town could sell the units at a slight profit over actual cost, with
the additional funds being allocated to the Housing Trust Fund for future use.
If this project proves to be successful, it could be repeated on another site.
Various sites to be considered for the study have been discussed, and they
include:
Ulbrich property
Mountain Bell tract
Spraddle Creek, Parcel B
Vail Heights
Donovan's Park area
Old Town Shops site
Parcel H at Big Horn
Big Horn sanitation site
Katsos Ranch
Tract "D" by Texaco
North`'~ofAspen Tree, east of Sandstone Park
VI. Revision of minunum development standards for dedicated employee housing
units.
Discussion has been held regarding the potential of establishing certain
development standards or density calculations which would pertain only to
dedicated employee housing units. This is a potentially difficult azea insofar as
the need would be to maintain acceptable standards of quality and neighborhood
compatibility, while at the same time recognizing unique needs of employee
projects.
In the event special standards were to be approved, they would likely address
issues such as:
• Open space
• Parking
• Setbacks
• Density calculations for dormitory-style or "studio" units
• Impact fee reductions
• Maximum unit size (projects should not exceed a defined .level or size)
8
.,
ROSALL REMMEN CARES
VII. Ongoing Revenue Sources.
In the event the Town wishes to expand the capacity of the affordable housing
program to the level by which a predictable funding source is created, we have
identified the following two techniques for further evaluation:
1) Employee "head tax"
2) Property tax
Tn each case, the potential might exist to incorporate a "sunset" provision which
targets a specific amount of funding to be raised over a 2- to 3-year period, with
the tax then being eliminated upon reaching that goal.
The purpose for such a program, if desired, would be to assist the community in
closing the current deficiency which exists in the supply of affordable housing
units through efforts coordinated by the Town, which utilize private sector
participation.
9
r
Employee Housing Unit Definition:
Maximum GRFA 500 s.f. to 900 s.f.
Maximum occupancy 2 persons per bedroom
Density: employee housing unit equals .5 of a dwelling unit
Parking: 1 space per bedroom
Kitchen allowed
Close proximity to bus or use of private shuttle required
Permanent rental restriction
Conditional Use review required for project in RC, LDMF, MDMF,
HDMF, SDD, ABD, CCIII (possibly other zone districts)
Dormitory Housing Unit Definition:
Maximum number of 15 units per building
Maximum GRFA of 250 s.f.
1 shared kitchen/lounge per 5 units, 350 s.f. minimum for
kitchen
Maximum occupancy of 2 persons per unit
Parking: 1 space per unit
Density: .33 of a dwelling unit
Close proximity to busline or use of private shuttle required
Permanent rental retraction
Conditional use review RC, LDMF, MDMF, HDMF, SDD, ABD. CCIII
(possibly other zone districts)
ORDINANCE NO. 6
SERIES OF 1990
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 8.32
OF TITLE 8 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL
TO EXPAND, STRENGTHEN, AND CLARIFY CODE PROVISIONS
RELATING TO SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES AND PLACES OF
EMPLOYMENT.
WHEREAS, studies by the Surgeon General of the United
States, the National Academy of Sciences and other health
organizations have linked passive exposure to tobacco smoke to a
variety of negative health conditions in non-smokers; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council seeks to achieve a reasonable
balance between the rights of smokers and non-smokers by
regulating smoking in certain public places and places of
employment; and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public health, safety,
and welfare that smoking be limited in the Town of Vail, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
VAIL, COLORADO:
1. Chapter 8.32 Smoking in Public Places
8.32.010 Legislative Intent
Because the smoking of tobacco or any other weed or
plant is a danger to health and is a cause of material annoyance
and discomfort to those who are present in confined areas, the
Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares it is necessary
and beneficial to the protection of the public health, safety, and
welfare to regulate smoking in certain public places.
8.32.020 Definitions
A. Employee
Employee means any person who is employed by any
employer.
B. Employer
Employer means any person, partnership, or
corporation, including a municipal corporation, who employs the
services of any person(s).
-1-
C. Bar, Nightclub, Tavern
Bar, nightclub or tavern means any establishment
primarily engaged in the business of selling or dispensing
alcoholic or other beverages.
D. Health Care Facility
Health Care Facility means any office or
institution providing individual care or treatment of diseases,
whether physical, mental or emotional or other medical,
physiological or psychological conditions.
E. Place of Employment
Place of employment means any enclosed area under
the control of a public or private employer which employees
normally frequent during the course of employment. A private
residence is not a place of employment.
F. Public Place
Public place means any .enclosed area in which the
general public is permitted, excluding the offices, work areas,
employee cafeterias or lounges not generally entered by the public
in the normal course of business for use of the premises. A
private residence is not a public place.
G. Restaurant
Restaurant means any establishment or place within
an establishment open to the public that offers food and beverages
for consumption on the premises.
H. Retail Store
Retail store means any establishment whose primary
purpose is to sell or offer for sale to consumer any goods, wares,
merchandise, articles or food for consumption off the premises.
I. Smoking
Smoking means the lighting of any cigarettes, cigar
or pipe, or the possession of any lighted cigarette, cigar, pipe,
regardless of its composition.
J. Sports Arena
Sports arena means any indoor facility primarily
used for sports, cultural or similar events.
-2-
K. Theater
Theater means any indoor facility primarily used
for the exhibition of any motion picture, stage drama, musical
recital, dance, lecture or other similar performance.
8.32.030 Smoking Prohibited
A. Smoking is prohibited in public places located in
the following:
1. Health Care Facilities
2. Assembly and Meeting Rooms
3. Retail Stores
4. Childcare Centers
5. Banks
6. Theaters and Sports Arena, except when smoking
is part of a theatrical production.
7. Laundromats
8. Post Offices
B. Smoking is prohibited in any building or vehicle
owned or operated by the Town of Vail, Colorado.
C. Smoking is prohibited in elevators and buildings
generally used by and open to the public including
elevators in offices, hotels and multi-family
buildings.
D. Smoking is unlawful in designated no smoking areas
on places of employment as set forth in Section
8.32.050.
E. Smoking is prohibited in public places located in
Restaurants if the owner or lessee of such places
designates all or part of such places as non-
smoking by signing the places as set forth in
Section 8.32.070.
-3-
8.32.040 Smoking Permitted
Smoking is permitted in the following public places
unless the owner or lessee of such places designates all. or part
of such places as non-smoking by signing the places as set forth
in Section 8.32.070:
A. Restaurants
B. Bars, nightclubs, taverns
8.32.050 Places of Employment
A. Within 60 days after the effective date of this
ordinance the following requirements shall apply in places of
employment:
(1) The employer shall attempt to reach a reasonable
accommodation, insofar as possible, between the preferences of
smoking and non-smoking employees; provided, however, that
employers are not required to incur any expenses to make
structural or physical modifications to accommodate individual
preferences; if a satisfactory accommodation cannot be reached,
the preferences of non-smoking employees shall prevail-but not to
the extent of requiring the expense of structural modifications;
(2) Smoking may be permitted in private, fully enclosed
offices even though such offices may be visited in the normal
course of business by non-smoking employees or occasionally by the
public;
(3) Smoking shall be prohibited in auditoriums, meeting
rooms, elevators, gymnasiums, medical facilities, conferences
rooms and rooms containing photocopying or other office equipment
used in common by employees;
(4) The employer shall designate at least 50 percent of
the seating capacity of cafeterias, lunchrooms and employee
lounges as no smoking areas; provided, however, that if there are
2 or more lounges available for employee use, one entire lounge
may be designated as a smoking area;
(5) The employer shall maintain a procedure to resolve
employee disputes and objections arising under any smoking
arrangement in the place of employment.
-4-
B. The employer is encouraged to adopt a written
smoking policy within the suggested 60 days and to communicate any
such policy to all employees within 3 weeks of its adoption.
C. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection
A of this section, every employer shall have the right to
designate any place of employment as a non-smoking area.
8.32.060 Discrimination or Retaliation Unlawful
It shall be unlawful for any employer, proprietor or
person in charge of public places or places of employment
regulated under 8.32.050 (5) to discharge, discriminate against or
in any manner retaliate against any person who requests the
designation of smoking areas or enforcement within no smoking
areas or designated smoking areas.
8.32.070 Signs
To advise persons of the existence of "No Smoking" or
"Smoking Permitted" areas, signs with letters not less than one
inch in height or the international no smoking symbol not less
than three inches in height shall be posted as follows:
A. In public places where the owner, proprietor or
person in charge prohibits smoking in the entire public place a
sign using the words "No Smoking" or the international no smoking
symbol, or both shall be posted within eye-level at all public
entrances or at eye-level and within ten feet of every entry into
the public place.
B. In public places where certain areas are designated
as smoking areas pursuant to this Chapter, the statement "No
smoking except in designated areas" shall be conspicuously posted
on all public entrances within eye-level or in a position at
eye-level within ten feet of entry into the public place.
C. In public places where smoking is permitted in the
entire building or area assigned using the words "This area is a
smoking area" in its entirety shall be conspicuously posted at
eye-level either on all public entrances or at eye-level within
ten feet of entry into the area or building.
-5-
8.32.080 Prohibited Smoking Areas
Smoking shall not be permitted and smoking areas shall
not be designated in those areas where smoking is prohibited by
the Fire Chief, State statute, ordinances, fire code regulations,
or other regulations of the Town of Vail, Colorado.
8.32.090 Sale of Tobacco Products to Minors
The sale of tobacco in any form from any source to
minors shall be prohibited. Anyone witnessed selling any tobacco
product to a minor shall be subject to the penalties herein.
8.32.100 Penalty
The penalty for violation of any provision of this
Chapter is a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).
8.32.110 Violations
The following acts constitute violations of this
article:
(A) Smoking in a posted no smoking area;
(B) Failure to post a no smoking sign as required by
this article;
(C) Willful destruction or defacement of a sign posted
as required by this article;
(D) Sale of any tobacco product to a minor.
2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares
it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, sub-
section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the
fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.
3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares
that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health,
safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants
thereof.
-6-
4. The repeal of the repeal and reenactment of any
provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in
this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any
duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective
date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
preceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision
repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision
hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously
repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
-7-
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON
of 1990, and a public hearing
ordinance on the day of
Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal
Ordered published in full this
1990.
FIRST READING this day
shall be held on this
_, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the
Building, Vail, Colorado.
day of ,
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED this day of , 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
MARCH 26, 1990
12:30 A Work Session on Air Quality.
2:00 Site Visits
3:00 Public Hearing
SITE VISITS
1. Approval of minutes from March 19, 1990
meeting.
3 2. A request for a side yard setback variance
and a stream setback variance .for Lot 9,
Block 3, Vail Row Houses (Unit #9).
Applicant: Walter Gramm
2 3. A request for a setback variance for the
construction of a garage on Lot 20, Block 7,
Vail Village 1st Filing.
Applicant: Peter Tufo
4 4. A request for a height variance in order to
add dormers to the upper floor of the
Mountain Haus at 292 E. Meadow Dr. (Part of
Tract B, Vail Village First Filing)
Applicant: Rich Brown/Mountain Haus Condo.
Assoc.
- 5. A request for a conditional use permit to
expand a proposed parking structure for the
Vail Valley Medical Center on Lots E and F,
Vail Village 2nd Filing at 181 West Meadow
Drive.
Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center
- 6. A request for a Special Development District
in order to construct three primary/secondary
structures on Lots 3, 4, and 5, Vail Valley
Third Filing.
Applicant: Deborah W. and Robert Warner
1 7. A request for an amendment to Special
Development District No. 22 and a major
subdivision for resubdivision of Lots 1-19,
Block 2, Lionsridge Filing No. 3.
Applicant: Mr. Pat Dauphinais, Dauphinais -
Moseley Construction
- 8. A request for a Special Development District
at the Garden of the Gods on Lot K, Block 5,
Vail Village Fifth Filing at 365 Gore Creek
Drive.
Applicant: Garden of the Gods, Mrs. A.G.
Hill Family
- 9. Appoint PEC representative for the April -
June, 1990 DRB term.
Note: Joint Council/PEC work session Tuesday, March 27, from
12:00-2:00 p.m., regarding employee housing.
t`
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
MARCH 21, 1990
3:00 p.m.
SITE VISITS
1:00 p.m.
4 1. Ricci Addition to Single Family Residence BR
Lot 5, Block E, Vail Das Schone #1
MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0
Consent approved.
2. Nevin Nelson Sign BR
7-Eleven Building
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
Staff approved.
3. The Village on Bighorn Creek - 8 Single Family Homes
Lots 1,2 & 3, Block 7, Bighorn 3 MM
MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0
Approved with conditions:
1. Approval of four, east units only.
2. Landscaping - list quantities. in plant key -
evergreens to be 1/3 at 6', 1/3 at 8' and 1/3 at 10'
in height.
6 4. VMRD Landscape Plan MM
Athletic Field / 620 Vail Valley Drive
MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0
Consent approval.
fi
5. Warner Properties - 3 P/S Residences TB
Lot 3,4 & 5, Vail Valley 3rd
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING.
6. Bramante/Halesth Duplex, New P/S Residence MM
Lot 47 Glen Lyon Subdivision
MOTION: Jamie M. SECOND: Diana D. VOTE: 3-0-1
Approved with conditions: Revisions to landscape plan,
as discussed. Submit for staff approval. Add additional
plant material and more groupings. (30 Dogwood and 10
Serviceberry). Ned Gwathmey abstained.
7. Rivolta - Remodel of Unit #3 MM
Gore Creek Plaza Building/193 Gore Creek Drive
MOTION: Jamie M. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0
Approved with condition: That the steel apron be painted
to match existing aprons.
7 8. Kirch/Berg Duplex MM
Lot 3, Gore Creek Park Subdivision
MOTION: Diana D. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0
TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING.
3 9. Anderson - Single Family Residence SM
Lots 1 & 2, Lionsridge Filing #4
MOTION: Diana D. SECOND: Pat H. VOTE: 4-0
TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING.
,~
2 10. Campbell Single Family Residence SM
Lot 4, Block 1, Lionsridge Filing #4
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING.
5 11. Riva Ridge South - Exterior Alteration in order to
construct an elevator.
Lot 7, Block 6, Vail Village 1st
MOTION: Pat H. SECOND: Jamie M. VOTE: 4-0
Relocate tree as per PEC requirements build as drawn -
planter box 5' from edge of asphalt.
1 12. Elk Creek Meadows - Single Family SM
Part of Parcel A, Lionsridge Filing #2 / Phase III The
Valley (Conceptual)
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL
13. Spruce Park - 7 Single Family Homes BR
Lot 7 part of 6, Block 1, Bighorn 3rd Addition
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
TABLED TO APRIL 4TH MEETING.
14. Dauphinais Subdivision (Conceptual Review) KP
Lots 1-19, Block 2, Lionsridge Filing #3
MOTION: SECOND: VOTE:
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW - NO VOTE.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Diana Donovan (PEC)
Pat Herrington
Ned Gwathmey
Jamie McCluskie
STAFF APPROVALS:
MEMBERS ABSENT•
NONE
.f
IOWA
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(3Q3j4T9-2138
(303)479-2139
office of community development
T0: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: March 23, 1990
SUBJECT: No Smoking Ordinance
Before Ordinance #6 is considered for first reading the staff
would like to clarify the purpose of this ordinance and the
Council's direction on several areas. The staff wishes to
resolve any concerns which may still exist regarding any or all
sections of this ordinance prior to a formal reading.
Last fall a contingent of concerned citizens approached the
Council and requested a smoking ordinance which would prohibit
smoking in all public places. There was considerable opposition
expressed by the restaurant community. They requested the
opportunity to attempt to regulate smoking in their individual
establishments without government intervention. Council agreed
to allow restaurateurs the opportunity to police themselves for
a limited time period after which further evaluations would be
made.
The group of citizens who initially raised the issue were
willing to accept this temporary compromise provided legislation
was drafted to prohibit smoking in public places and places of
employment. There still seems to be some confusion as to the
difference between a public place and places of employment.
Although the definition section of the ordinance does address
both of these areas, the staff felt it necessary to further
explain the distinction.
~;.
Changes
1. Public Place and Place of Employment Definitions 8.32.020(C)
& 8.32.020(D)
A public place is a business or place the primary function
of which is to offer a service, function or goods for sale
to the general public on a continuous basis during hours of
operation. The business or office functions which may be
associated with the public place would be considered
secondary to the service to customers or patrons. This
does not exclude the possibility that portions of this
business or public place could be considered as places of
employment.
A place of employment generally refers to a business or
office, the primary function of which is to provide a
service to select clients, but not to the public in
general. This would refer for example to offices operated
by accountants, lawyers, architects, real estate agents,
etc. This would refer to the corporate offices of Vail
Associates for example. Although Vail Associates functions
to provide a service to the public, their corporate offices
are operated for the functioning of the business and
although they may be frequented by members of the public
for business reasons, they are not considered to be a
public place. The inclusion of this section in the
ordinance is to protect the rights of the employees who may
otherwise have no means of recourse for resolution of
smoking disputes. It is not the intention of the staff or
the intent of the ordinance to include this section as a
means to regulate private business.
The classification of a business as a public place does not
preclude the application of the rules for places of employ-
ment. A business such as a retail shop, grocery store or
other business may in fact be a public place, but may also
have areas such as lunch rooms, business offices or locker
rooms which are not generally frequented by the public and
therefore are under the jurisdiction of the business owner
for policy development. For example, Safeway is considered
to be a public place, but it's offices, employee break room
and locker room areas are not and it would be up to the
manager/owner to set forth policy for these areas.
2. Smoking Permitted 8.32.040
The ordinance has been changed to include Section 8.32.040
which specifically details those public places in Town were
smoking is currently permitted and will continue to be
permitted at this time. The inclusion of this section
should clarify the question of signage which was previously
raised and is addressed in Section 8.32.070.
3. Restaurant Signage Where Smoking is Permitted 8.32.070(C)
One further area which the staff seeks direction on would
be Section 8.32.070(C). This addresses those public places
such as restaurants where smoking is permitted. If this
section were to be included, it would require restaurants
to post signs which would effectively indicate if they have
a no smoking section and thereby allow the public to make
informed choices based on personal preferences. Is this
something the Council wishes to see remain in the ordinance
or should this section be deleted? Staff recommends that
this section remain.
4. Written Policy 8.32.050(B)
Per Council direction this section encourages rather than
requires employers to adopt a written smoking policy.
5. Sale of Tobacco to Minors 8.32.090
The other significant change is in Section 8.32.090 which
previously addressed the question of vending machines in
public places. This section has been changed to conform
with Colorado law which prohibits the sale of tobacco or
tobacco products to minors from any source.. This places
responsibility for compliance on all businesses where
tobacco products are sold and not solely on vending machine
owners.
6. Violations 8.32.110
Staff deleted knowing failure to inform any person who
unknowingly violates this article.
These were the major areas of concern as expressed by Council at
the last worksession. Since that time the definitions section
of the ordinance and Section 8.32.030, areas where smoking is
prohibited, have been re-drafted by Larry Eskwith. It is
staff's hope that the changes will serve to clarify the intent
of the ordinance and make it more easily understood.
CONTING
TOWN OF VAIL
COtINCIL CONTINGENCY REPORT
as of March 22, 1990
ACCOUNT
--------------------------------------------------------------
01-0100-52857 Original Budget $100,000
USES:
O1-8300-52807 Vail Athletic Ambassador Program 5,000
O1-2100-51210 Vail Affordable Housing Study 10,500
fl1-2100-5121C1 Eagle Co. Housing Needs Assessment 1,000
O1-3310-51210 Fire Services Analysis 29,500
O1-331C1-50100 Hot Winter Nights Promotion 240
O1-8300-52821 Special Events Coordinator 30,000
O1-5110-51210 People Mover UMTA Grant Application 10,C100
01-0100-51101 1990 Census Salary Supplementation 9,000
O1-0100-51210 Recreation/Housing Election Info.
-- 4,000
---------
-------------- -------------------------------------
Total Contingency Used 99,240
Council Contingency Remaining: $760
/ ~
~~ 1
March 22, 1990
Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell
**** Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Congressman Campbell,
On behalf of the Vail Town Council and a large representation
of the Vail community, I write to-you regarding an issue of
grave concern and potentially dangerous Local and national
implications.
The issue is the proposed Beartree Lot land exchange
involving the United States Forest Service, Park Service,
Bureau of Land Management and Mr. and Mrs. Michael
Tennenbaum, part-time residents of Vail. The Tennenbaums are
seeking a trade of up to 2,000 acres of private land
throughout the region for an acre of prime Forest Service
land at the base of Vail mountain. To accomplish this trade,
the Tennenbaums are seeking congressional support and the
enactment of legislative language during the 101st Congress.
We stand adamantly opposed to the trade. If allowed success,
this trade sets a precedent which threatens Vail's greatest
natural resource - Vail mountain and the outdoor experience
which it provides to millions of individuals annually. If
allowed success, the starting gun has sounded for anyone with
financial means to develop property in the location of their
choice regardless of public domain - on Vail mountain and
elsewhere.
We consider the purchase and preservation of land to be used
as open space a high priority, in Vail and throughout the
nation. However, the issue at hand is far more than simple
acquisition of land for public gain. Proponents of the
exchange contend that one acre of land on Vail mountain is
expendable and can be sacrificed for environmental gain
elsewhere. This view is wholly subjective, particularly
since no formal environmental studies have taken place, and
devalues the outdoor experience received by Vail visitors and
residents alike. It does not seem that preserving acreage in
undeveloped areas is more important for the overall goal of
land protection than preserving an undeveloped portion of a
resort area.
We are concerned about maintaining local land control and
protecting the natural quality of our community and mountain,
but our opposition to the Tennenbaum proposal goes far beyond
local interests. Should not acquisition of such lands be
dictated by our national policy makers and not individuals
who are seeking private gain? Under the previous
administration, expansion of our public lands system became
subject to the free market. The decrease in federal funds
for land acquisition, as well as various tax incentives,
resulted in the unlikely partnership of environmental groups
and land developers just as we are witnessing with the
Tennenbaum proposal. Environmental groups, desperate for
increased protection of lands became supportive of such
acreage swaps, paving a successful. path for individuals such
as the Tennenbaums. The result: Any parcel of land, public
or not, is for sale if the right price is offered. .Lands
being added and taken away from the public lands systems are
not dictated by the many, as our democracy should operate,
but by the few. It seems that, if this trend continues, the
objectives of a comprehensive land acquisition program will
never be met.
Another point of concern to us is that, because the
Tennenbaums will not actually have a legal option on lands to
be swapped until congressional action is taken, there is no
guarantee the 2,000 acres in question will even be available.
The resulting land trade may be even less desirable for the
public good than proposed.
We respectfully ask that you closely examine the local and
national implications of the proposed Beartree Lot land
exchange. What is of consequence here are the undermining of
Vail's efforts to preserve open space for its community and
the State of Colorado, national land acquisition policy
implications, the precedent set through such a land exchange
maneuver, subjective weighing of one environment's "worth"
vs. another's, and federal disregard for local land and
zoning control. The price of this transaction, for both the
present and future, seems far greater than the gain served by
adding 2,000 acres to the public land systems.
Please oppose the proposed exchange and encourage your fellow
House and Senate members to fight the proposal as well.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this important
issue facing the Vail community and we look forward to
hearing of your views at the earliest possible time.
Very Truly Yours,
Kent R. Rose
Mayor
..
Beartree Lot Land Exchange
as Proposed by Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum
BACKGROUND AND VAIL TOWN COUNCIL PERSPECTIVE
BACKGROUND
PROPOSAL: Mr. and Mrs. Michael Tennenbaum, part-time Vail
residents, have proposed the purchase and exchange of
approximately -2,000 acres of private land for one acre of
United States Forest Service land on Rockledge Road at the
base of Vail mountain.
CONGRESSIONAL ACTION: Because this proposed land exchange
requires involvement of the United States Forest Service,
Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, and private land
owners, congressional action is being sought to expedite the
process. The Tennenbaums hired the firm of Ray Kogosvek and
Associates to assemble the acreage offerings, as well as
lobby Congress to enact the necessary language.
Congressional action must be completed by October 1990 if the
exchange is to proceed as scheduled. If the congressional
action is not completed, the legislative efforts will
terminate and the specific language must be reintroduced in
the following Congress.
VIEWS OF THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
What is of consequence here are the undermining of Vail's
efforts to preserve open space for its community and the
State of Colorado, national land acquisition policy
implications, the precedent set through such a land exchange
maneuver, subjective weighing of one environment's "worth"
vs. another's, and federal disregard for local land and
zoning control.
The following reflects the Vail Town Council's reasoning for
opposing the Beartree Lot land exchange. These views are
based on input derived from public meetings held recently and
longstanding municipal policy regarding land exchange
matters.
LOCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Vail Efforts to Preserve Environmental Quality and Open Space
The purchase and preservation of land to be used as open
space has been a high priority for the Town of Vail
throughout the last decade. A total of $10 million in public
funds have been spent to protect 1,400 acres from development
in the Vail area. Maintaining Forest Service land as open
space, even when it becomes private, has long been practiced
and the Vail Town Council will not support a proposal which
contradicts these local efforts and priorities.
Preservation of Certain Lands at the Expense of Others
The proposed land exchange threatens Vail's greatest natural
resource, Vail mountain. To state that a parcel of land on
this mountain is not as "environmentally significant" as
parcels located in various other locations is a very
subjective call, particularly since no formal environmental
studies have been conducted. Proponents of the exchange
contend that one acre of land on Vail mountain is expendable
and can be sacrificed for environmental gain elsewhere. The
Vail Town Council disputes this subjective judgement and
urges public land proponents to work toward a net increase of
protected public lands rather than the gain of specific acres
at the expense of others.
Local Control of Land and Zoning
The Town of Vail, Vail Associates and the Forest Service
have, in partnership, worked to preserve the outdoor
experience which millions of individuals enjoy on Vail
mountain annually. Local planning processes and zoning
regulations are in place to ensure protection of this natural
resource, while providing for controlled growth and
development. The Vail Town Council will not support
subversion of established avenues for such proposals and the
dangerous precedent setting potential of this action.
Nonbinding Legislation
Those hired by the Tennenbaums contend the legislative
language would be "site specific... and is not to be
~~
construed as precedent for similar exchanges. The fact of
the matter is that no legislative language is binding to
future congresses and such legislation, when approved, serves
as later justification for similar action. The Vail Town
Council will not support efforts which could result in such
future proposals.
NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS:
Subversion of National Land Acquisition Policy
The Vail Town Council believes public land acquisition should
be dictated by national policy makers, under the auspices of
established national land acquisition priority lists. The
addition or removal of acreage from the public lands system
should not be dictated by private sector agendas, as is the
case with the Beartree Lot proposal.
Subversion of Traditional Federal Land Exchange Process
The administrative process is the traditional route for a
federal land exchange, such as the one proposed, and involves
studies, environmental impact statements, public input from
affected parties, etc. Congressional action to implement
such an exchange by-passes these important steps, leaving no
information regarding the ecological significance of the
parcels of land in question. The Town of Vail opposes the
means being pursued to accomplish the proposed exchange.
Vulnerability of All Public Lands
If the Beartree Lot land exchange is accepted, it would seem
that perhaps no acre of land is indeed protected. It becomes
evident that if the right offer is made, any parcel of land
is fair game. The Vail Town Council will not support an
action which undermines the essence of public ownership and
leaves all parcels of public land vulnerable.
Subjective Judgement of One Person's Wilderness Experience
vs. Another's - Vail mountain provides an outdoor experience
for millions annually and is indeed the extent of many
individuals' outdoor exposures. This swap assumes that
preserving acreage in undeveloped areas is more valuable than
preserving an undeveloped portion of a resort area. The Vail
Town Council is opposed to the exchange as it devalues the
nature experience of Vail visitors in favor of that
experienced by individuals in other locations.
Tennenbaum Currently Has No Option on the Proposed Lands
The land exchange proponents will not actually have a legal
option on the lands to be swapped until congressional action
is taken. Thus, the resulting acreage to be swapped could be
quite different and even less desirable for the public good
than that proposed.
TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department, Kristan Pritz
DATE: March 23, 1990
RE: Town Council's direction to amend elements of the
zoning code.
Over the past two weeks, the Town Council has specifically
identified two areas of the zoning code in which they would like
to see amendments. These include the minimum lot size for single
family lots and a variety of provisions that relate to the
parking fee program in Commercial Core I and II.
These specific requests are timely in that the staff is presently
developing a work program for comprehensive revisions to the
zoning code, sign code, and Design Review guidelines. It would
be our recommendation that these two amendments be addressed as a
part of the overall evaluation of these development codes. The
comprehensive evaluation of these codes will certainly involve
numerous amendments. As a part of this process, the staff has
proposed that all the issues relevant to these codes and
guidelines be evaluated and addressed based on a priority plan.
Assuming single family lot size and the parking fee program
remain priority items, they could be addressed as soon as late
May.
These two amendments can certainly be addressed in fairly short
order if that is the desire of the Council. However, we feel
that it makes the most sense to evaluate all required amendments
and prioritize them based on a comprehensive evaluation of these
development codes.
B..
~:
IN PUBLIC PLACES
t
`~
i ~~
•~ ~
1,
~:
V
C O L O R A D O
C O U N C I L O N T H E A R T S
A N D H U M A N I T I E S
-.J
~y ~ .
s•
Lnaa Lowry
Garrnen's Grinerc, 1986
se•• x s~^ oa
Mesa College, Learning Resource Crnrer
Grand Junccon
,~, R T 1 N P L' B L
In 1977 the Colorado General Assemble passed the Art in
Public Places Act requiring chat one percent of the construction
costs of neN or renovated state-owned buildings be spent to
acquire art`cork for permanem display at the project site.
Implementation of the laN• is the responsibilit}~ of the
Colorado Council on the Ans and Humanities (CCAH).
Over the years, the la+.• has been amended to strengthen the
program and s[reamline the administration. The current
provisions of the laH• are detailed in this brochure.
Wh~~ ~~a~ the la~+ established?
The expressed desire by the members of the 1eg~slature was
to enhance the ~•orking environment and to improve the
character and qualm- of state buildings through installation
of pemnanent works of an. The State of Colorado introduced
the statute "in recognition of iu responsibilit}• to create a
more humane environment of distinction, enjo}•ment, and
pride for all of its citizens." To that end, the lav.• was
passed. Ten }•ears Later, the resulu can be viewed from
Grand Junction to Trinidad.
Photo: Kuen Mcven
Who selects the artwork?
C P L A C E S
Ho~• is the art~•ork acquired?
The jur}• ma}• select the arn+•ork b}• commissioning an artist
for work specificall}• designed for a particular site or b}•
purchasing an existing piece of artwork. Commissioned
artists arc required co prepare and present a final design
proposal to the jur}' before a contras for fabrication and
installation is awarded. For a direct purchase, the artist
receives a contract for sale and installation. The program is
open to all artisu, with preference first to arrists who are
Colorado residents, and then to arrists from other states and
territories. Upon instillation, all purchased or commissioned
arnrork becomes the propert}• of the state and a part of the
state's permanent public art collection.
V1'hat is the funding histon~?
The first work of art was acquired in 1978. Since then,
approximately 1800,000 of artwork have been purchased for
the collection. An usessment of the collection, conducted in
January, 1985, indicated an increase in value of 62 percent
from the original purchase price. Not all capital construction
projects tie eligible for the percent-for•art allocation. In
fact, oral}• one-tenth of one percent of a21 spiral construc-
tion projecu appropriated by the State of Colorado since tht
inceprion of the AIPP program have received percent-for-art
funds.
CCAH, in conjunction with the client agency, appoinu a
different art selecrion committee, or jur}•, for each project.
By law, each tommittee has at least eight members: the
project architect; a representative of the state client agency;
s tenant of the building who will use it on a daily basis; a
ddzen az loge who lives in the lot:al community in which
the project is being construeud; a professional artist, usually
someone who pncnces in the eommunin• in which the proj-
ect is located; a member of the board of the Colorado
Council on the Aru and Humanities; and one member each
from the Stan Senate and House of Representirives.
C O L O R A
R Ed..ard L„wc
Crrau~r B~Ja.l~cr :drtvl 14r:
b' ~ 3U' \tnrd !.frduH:d~FrapM
lim~rr,m of Colurad~~. it~mafc~ HilUBouldrr
__ +
a1 Ty
R ri
1
' ;~~ii
5. 1.. t;.•~; ~;,*~ +t..t~e:, l~nnnnu;in lullr~c }i \1~rKen
n n C O U N C I L O N T~
i~
l
A
R
T
I
N
P
U
B
L
I
C
P
L
A
C
E
S
1 9 i 8- 1 9 7 9
AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTWORK ARTIST AMOUNT
Department of Higher Education
Mesa College Grand Junction Houston Hall Remodeling
Painring Luis Eades t 5,500
Ceramic Walt Relief Rodger Lang 8,500
Morgan Communiry• College Fon Morgan Andemic Classroom Building
Granite Sculpture John Young 4,800
Trinidad State Junior College .Trinidad Fine Arts Auditorium
pynang Clark Richen 5,469
l 9 i 9- 1 9 t+ 0
Dc anment of Administration
Social Services Denver University of Colorado/Denver
Snack Bar Renovation
Collage Helen Redman i 1,000
Department of Higher Education
Mesa College Grand Junction Houston Hall Remodeling
Marble Sculpture Frank Swanson 10,000
Morgan Community Collegt Fon Morgan Academic Classroom Building
Steel Sculpture Fred Myers 600
Unit•ersin of Colorado Boulder Ramalev Building
Wood Sculptures (2) Roben Behrens l 5,000
Ceramic Nall Reliefs (5) Jack Bowers 5,400
Photographs (l5) Chris Brown 5,500
Ceramics (4) R. Douglas Fev 5,014
Batiks (2) Alice McClelland 2,400
Wearing Lesley Shearer 5,400
' Dnw•ings (2) Craig Smith 1,100
pint Barbara Takenaga 200
Painting George Woodman
h 4,000
400
1
Weavings (2) Charlotte Ziebart ,
University of Colorado Colorado Springs Science Building
Aluminum Sculpture Erick Johnson 5,600
Universin of Colorado/ Demrr Intensive Cart Unit Renovation
Health Sciences Center Marble Sculpture George Turner 1,900
University of Northern Colorado Greeley Caner Hall Renovation
Weaving Susan Hoover 5,000
Ceramic Wall Relief Jovice Newrttan 6,000
Ceramic Sculpture Nada Seibel 1,500
Wood Sculpture Bruce Taylor 6,000
University of Southern Colorado Pueblo Asset Building
Wood k Steel Sculpture
Carl Reed
22,539
Depanment of Administration
Social Services
Denver
Blind and Deaf Rehabilitation
Center
Marblt Sculptures Madeline Wiener 8 5,200
Copper Wall Relief William Motton 1,595
Wood Wall Relief Vincent O'Btien 1,205
Depanmmt of Corrections Canon Ciry New Tag Plant
Ceramic Wall Relief
Ken Williams
5,800
Canon Ciry• Inmate Sertices Building
Ceramic Wall Relief Ken Williams 5,000
a
a
N P U B L I C P L A C L S
R T I
A
1 980-1981
(continued)
'
ARTIST AMOUNT
LOCATION itiVORK
PROJECT/AR
AGENCY
nt of Education
Denver' State Office Building Reno~ition
i ~~ Dotts~elty = 795
Departme c
Cerartt
Depattmmt of Higher Eduction
ado State University
l
C
Fort Collins Crnter
D pv Rexanna Bartlett 750
15,285
or
o nung
Steel Sculpture Richard Mdes
Hotchkiss Roger Mesa Experimrntal Station
Wood Q Steel Sculpture Cul Reed 2,440
University of Colorado Colorado 5 rin s
p g Dwite Hall Remodeling
Painting Muilyn Markowitz 4,246
Univers;n• of Colorado/ Denver Intensive Can Unit Renotation
Wood Sculpture Roger AsaY
Nancy Smith 6,092
1,550
5
Health Sciences Center Fiber garbua Donachy 0
5
550
P
na (2 Mulea Ta~lor 487
n
)
Painting Suzy Roes er
aclc Bowers
J 1,100
Cenmu Wall Relief
University of Southern Colorado
Pueblo Ph sinl Maintenance Plant
Concrete Wall Relief Sandra Robishaw 9,000
Depattment of Institutions
i Golden Golden Gate Youth Camp Roger Asay 900
ces
Division of Youth Sen Wood Sculpture
Brighton Adams County Center
Photographs (2) Chris Brown 268
Department of Lora] A$airs Denver Firing Range
Photographs (10) N,nty Wood 2,509
1 9 8 1- 1 9 8 2
Department of Higher Eduction
her Eduction Center
Hi
i
Denver Landsu ing
Fib
ture
r Scul Barbua Baer 8 1,500
g
/,urar
a
Universiq• of Colorado Boulder e
p
Ramaley Hall Renovation
Dnw~ngs (2) Ma~yynn Duke
Edwud Lowe
R 1,500
9,256
Holographic Sculpture
ntin
l P .
Roberto Lucero ]0,579
500
1
g
ai
Mura
Ceramic ~p~ Sartoris
Cnig Smith ,
1,800
Drawings (2) Sandra Witcow 5,100
Painring
1982-1988
cess completed for projecu in Grarid Juncrion, Pueblo and Boulder. Contracu signed in FY 85-84.
Jury selection pro
1 9 8 8- 1 9 8 4
Depar>st,ent of Adminisiruion Gland Junction Gened Purpose Administration
Building
~lizabetlt MapeUi
f 20,000
Glass Moral Krnneth Williams ~~~
Ceramic Sttslpture
pepartment of Eduction
hool for the Deaf and Blind
S Colorado Springs Main Hall Addition
Mural Painting
~
~n 5,500
12,500
c Marble 8c 54u Mosaic S
J
.Moved w School for the Deaf and Blind in Colorado Springs
-,
r'
._
( A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E S
1 9 8 8- 1 9 8 4
(continued)
AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTWORK ARTIST AMOUNT
De mrnt of Higgher Eduntion
olondo State Universiq•
Fort Collins
Glover Building Renovarion
Clark Richert
i 15,450
Painting
Dewing Oath Murphy 1,250
Paintingg Carol Nordgren 1,600
prince (S) Marlea Taylor 750
Pucblo Vocational Community Pucblo Replacement of Heating Plant
Rose
Bar
2,56>s
College Ceramic Inlay ry
Universin• of Colorado Boulder Chemistry Building Renovation
Anne Currier
~~
Dravring
Painung Jem DeLaCruz 600
Paintings (3) Luis Eades 1,100
Soo
Cenmtc
Painting James Foster
Craig Hansen 750
Bronze Sculpture Gan• Voss s00
Dante Addition to Petiottning
Arta Building
Granite Q Steel Scu]pturc
John Young
IO,S50
University of Colorado Colorado Springs Engineering and Applied
Sciences Budding
Glass Muni
Elizabeth Mapelli
Y0,150
Ccnmic Mural john Lewis 15,000
DraMing Marilyn Duke 10,150
Main Ha11 Remodeling
Emironmennl Sculpture
Beth Juliar•Skodje
5,141
1 9 8 4- 1 9 8 5
De artment of Administration
l Department of Education Denver Stmt GedtMeBdualA nal Scul cure
p George Peters = 25,000
Deparvnem of Cornctions
do Territorial Correctional
l
C Canon Ciry Cellhouse 1 Ie 7
Steel Sculpture
Chris Byars
s9,000
ora
o
Faciliry• Environmental Sculpture Andrew Leicester 19,500
Department of Higfier Eduntion
Universit)• of Colorado
Colorado Spring:
Engtneering and Applied Scences
ldi
ng
Bui
Steel Sculpture
Roben Behrens
29,800
1 9 8 5- 1 9 8 6
Department of Higher Eduntion
Mesa College
Gtartd Junction
Learning Resource Censer
Roxana Bartlett
t 1,500
Fiber
Photograph
Phyllis Baumann 750
1
600
' Aluminum Wall Sculpture William Burrggess
ine Calzolari
El .
5,000
Sandstone Sculpture
Paintings (2) a
Marc Conly 650
Painting
i Michael Duffy
Marilyn Dukc 1.200
1,500
ng
Dew
painting Robert Ecker 1,
lhotognph
CeTamKS (~ ~a~' Emrich
A Douglas Fey
F
1,500
400
2
groom W Scylptun oster
]ames .
~
painting
Photograph rarrt Ann Furumo
Linda Girvin 2,500
~ Suzanne Hanson ~~
amics (s)
Ca Carol ICliger
•~
•~
A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E S
1 9 8 5- 1 9 8 6
(continued)
AGENCY LOCATION PROJECT/ARTNORK ARTIST AMOUNT
Department of Higher Eduction
Mcu College
Grand Junction Paper
Mary EUen Long = 550
1000
Panong
Fiber Linda Lowry
Jane Mathews 1,600
Drawing
print
Cath Murphy
Theodore Thomas !00
270
9 8 6- 1 9 5 7
Deparvnmt of Higher Eduction
Fort Levv~s College
Durango
Noble Hall Classroom Building
500
i 18
Fiber Sculpture
Aluminum & Neon Sculpture Geo peters
Be
Erick Johnson ,
6,500
Mesa College Grand Junction Learning Resource Center
Steel Sculpture William Bu ess
B 80,000
Morgan Communin• College Fort Morgan Voc~tional/Administntion Facility
Fiberglass Wall Relief
Susan Furini
4,500
University of Northern Colorado Greeley Kepner Hall Renovation
Ceramic Sculpture
Barbara Grygutis
31,000
Western State College Gunnison Taylor Hall Renovation
Steel & Granite Sculpture
J.P. Rico Furman
27.000
y c I t, C ~:
Depanment of Administration
Social Services Denver
Administnoon Building Renovation
= 4
4~
Aluminum Sculpture
i
i William Bur ess
g
lames Colbert .
2,900 ~
nt
ng
Pa
Prints (3) Bennis Cunningham 1,455 t
print Atthur Geisert
Paul Gillis Y,S00
Y,500
Painting
Photographs (3) David Diaz Guerrero 645
Fiber (3) Connie Lehman 1,200
Paintin
ra Linda Lowly 2,500
750
phs (2)
Photog
Photographic Installation Karen Meyers
Barbara Jo Revelle 9,000
Painting Clark Richen
Woodman
Beer 6,000
3,500
Print
Ceramic y
Berry Woodman 5,500
Paintin George Woodman 5,000
Ceramu Mural Nina Yankowitz 6,000
Depattment of Higher Eduction
Colondo School of Mines Golden
Berthoud is Stratton Hall Renovations
Clark Richert
George Woodman
3.000
6,000
' Painting
Paintin
e John Young 38,500
& Steel Sculpture
Gnnit
Department of Public Safety
Colondo Sate Patrol Golden
New Administration Facility
Paula Cnnc
1,005
Prints (8)
Photograph Barbara Houghton Y00
Cihl;il'Q:~~ CUl<)iC~: Gl't t~i( ,'~l'~~ Qli~ Hr:1)~Cilll~lr'~
770 Pennsylvania Scrett Denver, Colorado 80208
.~ `
.,
.~
A R T I I\ P L' B L I C
,-
~~'~~.
~~
P L A C E S
\tanl~n Duly
t'nr;ird lnp~~:R. 14si 5~' > >. Pa~:e! and caioTCd prucil
The Selection Process t'm~rr.u. of Colnnd~. EnRinarnnF and A1•pi:cd Scn:~cr. Building C.•iurad..• SprinPs
All artwork is selected b.• a ditTerent committee, or jury,
for each project. (See text for details on jun• composition).
CCAH staff facilitates the selection process and the CCAH
board reviews jut}• recommendations for final approval. All
meetings are open to the public and are announced as such.
The selection process takes approximately six months to
complete:
. The jun• meets on site to discuss the architectural plans t"'"`~` •~i"" Pr:rt'
worlmF u:~ Sl~.~rp;. 1~~~
and identifi' locations and t.•pes of artwork most appro- Drl:~nmrm of .~dm:r.a;r~uun.
priate for that site. Arn+•ork may be acquired through the c„~,• oe„r eu;Idmg~Urn.,•;
direct purchase of existing work or through asite-specific
commission.
. Artists are notified regarding details of each project. The Collection
• Applications and slides are received by CCAH and Number of artworks 175
organized through the Colorado Artists Register. Number of artists
repnsenced 121
• A panel of visual arts professionals meeu to pre-screen Number of Colondo arasu l07
the applicants' slides. Number of out-of-state
• The jury meets a second ame to review the remaining arusa 14
applicanu' slides; finalists are selected. Funding Histor}'
• Finalists are contacted to prepare final proposals. Fy 78.79 8 17,269
• The jury meeu a third ame to t~iew finalists' site- 79-80 96,967
specific proposals and budgets; final recommendations 80.81 68,928
are made to the CCAH board. 81-82 31,035
82-83 -0-
• Jury recommendations are presented co the CCAH board 65-84 140,159
for final approval. 84-85 172,800
• The mved artist enter into a contract with CCAH. 85-86 47,345
aPP 86-87 127,500
a7-88 lo2sss
Tod 8779,SS3
Photo:
Laren Meyers
H E A R T S A N D H U M A N I T I E S
Elvur Cali•.i.t.
Archc. ~~. I4~i
btraa CulirK.. Lrananf
..P
Other States With Percent-For-Art Legislation
Alaska Nevada
A~~• New Hampshire
Connecticut NM' 3~~5'•
District of Columbia New Mexico
Florida Oregon
Hawaii Pennrylvania
Illinois South Carolina'
lows T~• .J'~
Maine Unh•
Massachusetts Washington
Michigan' Wisconsin ^
Minnesota' Wyoming
Montana'
Nebraska
'voluntary
tksigre t.Yesstlman Desian Assodaies '.:/~i..tt~
-~..~.."s_ -
Colorado Council
on the Arts
and Humanities
770 Pennsyl~•ania Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
27 0-120-000
This brochure highlighu and identifies the artwork acquired
by the Snte of Colondo as a result of iu ~~ns° lase
program. For further information and ap X70 Pennsylvania
wnnct the Art in Public Places Prog'ran-.
Street. Denver, Colondo 80203 (Telephone: 303/866-5457}.
Sande Robishaw
Unoded. 1911, 560 square ka (S° runauK ~ ConcMr
Universip• of Soucltern Caloradd>'uea°
~,..A.~
-:.~.%r-
BULK RATE
U.S. Postage
PAID
Denver, CO
Permit No. 788
A R T I N P U B L I C P L A C E 5
a=
} +-
COLORADO REVISED STATIITES
volume lOB
1988 Replacement volume
Government 1B
Edited, Collated, Revised,
Annotated, and Indeed
IInder the Supervision and Direction of the
by
CHARLES W. PIKE OF THE COLORADO BAR,
REVISOR OF STATIITES,
AND THE
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE LEGAL SERVICES
Published with Annotations through 745 P.2d 1391, 674
F.Supp.1584, 834 F.2d 1583, 108 S. Ct. 1129, 79 Bankr. 1023, 58
U.Colo. L. Rev. 514, and 64 Den. U.L. Rev. 750 and from 16 Colo.
Law. 495 through 17 Colo. Law. 602
Reenacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado
as the Statutory Law of Colorado of a General and
Permanent Nature
Bradford Publishing Co. Denver, Colo.
Printers and Distributors
ALLOCATION FOR ART
ARTICLE 80.5
Allocation for Art
24-80.5-101. Works of art in public places - allocations
therefor from capital construction costs - guidelines - fund
created.
24-80.5-102. Works of art. in correctional facilities.
24-80.5-101. Works of art in public places - allocations
therefor from capital construction costs - guidelines - fund
created.
(1) (a) The state of Colorado, in recognitiori of its
responsibility to create a more humane environment of
distinction, enjoyment, and pride for all of its
citizens and in recognition that public art is a
resource which stimulates the vitality and economy of
the state's communities and which provides opportunity
for artists and other skilled workers to practice their
crafts, declares it to be a matter of state policy
that, when appropriate, a portion of each capital
construction appropriation be allocated for the
acquisition of works of art to be placed in public
places.
(b) There is hereby established an art in public places
program to be administered by the Colorado Council on
the Arts and Humanities. All works of art purchased
and commissioned under the art in public places program
shall become a part of the state art collection
developed, administered and operated by the Colorado
Council on the Arts and Humanities.
(2) As used in this section, unless the context
othewise requires:
(a) "Architect" means the person or firm
designing the public construction project.
"Architect" includes architects, landscape
architects, interior designers, and other
design professionals.
(b) "Artist" means a practitioner in the visual
arts generally recognized by his peers or
critics as a professional who produces works
of art. "Artist" does not include the
architect of a public building under
construction or any member of his
architectural firm.
24-80.5-101
(c) "Public construction project" means a capital
construction project subject to the
provisions of section 24-30-1303(3).
(d) "Works of art" means all forms of original
creations of visual art including but not
limited to:
(I) Sculpture, in any material or
combination of materials, whether
in the round, bas-relief, high
relief, mobile, fountain, kinetic,
or electronic; or
(II) Painting, whether portable or
permanently fixed, as in the case
of murals; or
(III) Mosaics; or
(IV) Photographs; or
(V) Crafts made from clay, fiber and
textiles, wood glass, metal,
plastics or any other material, or
any combination thereof; or
(VI) Calligraphy; or
(VII) Mixed media composed of any
combination of forms or media or
(VIII) Unique architectural stylings or
embellishments, including
architectural crafts; or
(IX) Environmental landscaping; or
(X) Restoration or renovation of
existing works of art of historical
significance.
(3)(a)(I) Except as provided in section 24-80.5-102,
and except for agricultural facilities where livestock
are housed or agricultural products are grown, and
except for the diagnostic center located in the city
and county of Denver, and except for the facilities
authorized by section 1 of Senate Bill No. 101, enacted
at the second regular session of the fifty-fifth
general assembly, each capital construction
appropriation for a public construction project shall
include as a nondeductible item an allocation of not
less than one percent of the capital construction costs
to be used for the acquisition of works of art.
24-80.5-101
(II) Repealed, L.86, 2nd Ex. Sess., p.
19, 3, effective August 26, 1986.
(b) If the allocation provided for in paragraph
(a) of this subsection (3) is equal to or
greater than one thousand dollars, the
Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities
shall select a jury as described in paragraph
(aj of subsection (5) of this section.
(c) If the allocation provided for in paragraph
(a) of this subsection (3) is less than one
thousand dollars, the Colorado Council on the
Arts and Humanities may, at its discretion,
either select a jury or direct that the funds
be held within the works of art in public
places fund described in subsection (6) of
this section for the acquisition of works of~
art for the state agency for which the
capital construction project is to be
constructed. Whenever the funds for any
state agency equal or exceed one thousand
dollars, the Colorado Council on the Arts and
Humanities shall select a jury as described
in paragraph (a) of subsection (5) of this
section.
(d) The works of art acquired under this article
shall be placed in a publicly accessible
location within the state agency for which
the capital construction project is to be
constructed. A collection of works of art
may be selected for placement within the
state agency, and, at the discretion of the
state agency and the Colorado Council on the
Arts and Humanities, made available for loan,
circulation and exhibition in other public
facilities.
(4) The office of state planning and budgeting, in
both the planning and review stages in the
construction of state buildings and other public
facilities, shall be responsible for insuring
compliance with the provisions of subsection (3)
of this section.
(4.5) The administration of the Art in Public Places
program includes supervision of the jury process
which convenes to select the site and the artwork,
contracting, purchase, commissioning, reviewing of
design, execution and placement. Acceptance of
works of art shall be the responsibility of the
Colorado Council on the Arts and Humanities.
24-80.5-101
(4.5) (continued) These activities shall be conducted in
consultation with the executive directors of the
respective state agencies. The administration of
the Art in Public Places program shall not include
bearing the costs of maintaining or insuring the
works of art. Such costs shall be the
responsibility of the respective state agencies.
(5) All works of art acquired with funds allocated
under subsection (3) of this section shall be
contracted for separately from all other items in
the original construction plans pursuant to the
following guidelines:
(a) Selection of artists shall be by the jury
method. The Colorado Council on the Arts and
Humanities shall. select jury members and
convene juries. -Jury recommendations shall
be presented to the Colorado Council on the
Arts and Humanities for review and final
approval. Any significant changes in the
design or construction of the work of art
occurring after such final approval of the
artist shall be subject to the approval of
both the jury and the Colorado Council on the
Arts and Humanities. The Council shall
determine which changes shall be considered
"significant" for the purposes of this
paragraph (a). Each jury shall contain at
least the following:
(I) A representative from the
contracting state agency for which
the capital construction project is
to be constructed; and
(II) The architect; and
(III) A professional artist; and
(IV) A representative from each
community in which a capital
construction project is to be
constructed; and
(V) A member of the Colorado Council on
the Arts and Humanities.
(VI) Repealed, Ii. 83, p. 1015, 2,
effective June 15, 1983.
(VII) A representative from the
contracting state agency who is a
tenant or future tenant of the
capital construction site; and
24-80.5-101
(VIII) A member of the state House of
Representatives to be appointed by
the Speaker of the House; and
(IX) A member of the state Senate to be
appointed by the President of the
Senate.
(b) Repealed, L.83, P.1015, 2, effective June
15, 1983.
(c) Residents of Colorado shall be the
participants of this program except for
artists from other states and territories who
have achieved national recognition in their
specific forms of expression.
(d) Jury members who are not state employees
shall be reimbursed for actual and necessary
travel expenses incurred in fulfilling their
duties under this section. Such expenses
shall be deducted from the one percent
allocation for art.
(6)(a) There is hereby created in the state treasury
the Works of Art in Public Places fund, any
moneys in which are hereby appropriated to
the Colorado Council on the Arts and
Humanities, which fund shall be used
exclusively for the following purpose:
Purchase of works of art, taking into
consideration the artist's preliminary site
visit, the design fee, the total costs of
construction and installation of the work of
art, jury expenses, and program
administration in compliance with the
provisions of subsection (5) of this section.
(b) All moneys allocated for the acquisition of
works of art pursuant to subsection (3) of
this section shall be transmitted to the
state treasurer, who shall credit the same to
the Works of Art in Public .Places fund. Any
unexpended moneys shall remain in the fund at
the end of the fiscal year and shall not
revert to the capital construction fund.
f l
24-80.5-101
(c) If any moneys allocated for the acquisition
of works of art pursuant to subsection (3) of
this section are not expended after the jury
has been convened and has rendered its
decision, such moneys shall remain in the
Works of Art in Public Places fund to be used
for the capital construction project for
which they were allocated or shall revert to
the general fund.
(7) Nothing in this section shall be construed to
preclude the placement of works of art in public
places other than those placed pursuant to this
section.
Source: L. 77, p. 1252, 1;L. 79, p. 887, 7;L. 83, pp. 1014,
1015, 1, 2; L. 85, p. 631, 2; L. 86, p. 768, 4; L. 86, 2nd
Ex. Sess., p. 19, 3, L. 87, pp. 1112, 1114, 1, 4, 3, 2.
Editors note: The diagnostic center located in the Denver
metropolitan area was authorized by senate Bill No. 155 (chapter
135, Session Laws of Colorado 1986). Senate Bill No. 101
(chapter 48, Session Laws of Colorado 1986) authorized youth
training aad detention facilities, and additional facilities in
Pueblo, to be operated by the Department of Institutions.
Cross references: For the establishment of the state Council on
the Arts and Humanities, see article 9 of title 23.
24-80.5-102. Works of art in correctional facilities.
(1) Each capital construction appropriation for a
correctional facility shall include as a
nondeductible item an allocation of not less than
one-tenth of one percent of the capital
construction costs to be used for a prison inmate
art fund. They moneys in such fund shall be used
for materials to allow inmates to create works of
art to be included in the construction of or to be
placed permanently in such facility. The
Department of Corrections shall administer by rule
and regulation a competitive program among the
inmates of such facility in order to determine
which art projects and inmates shall receive an
incentive award not to exceed two hundred dollars
each. The Colorado Council on the Arts and
Humanities shall appoint one of its members to
serve in an advisory capacity to the department of
corrections on the implementation of this section.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "correctional
facility" means any state facility in which
persons are or may be lawfully held in custody as
a result of a conviction of a crime.
Source: L. 87, p. 1115, 5.
~~~
~t
•-,
~ESIGn•ARiS
Issue 6, Fall 1989
About This Issue
Most of us feel overwhelmed by
the rampant growth intruding on
Americas rural landscape. Every
place begins to look like every other
place. Good planning and design are
hard to find.
Fortunately; organizations like the
National Trust for Historic
Preservation. the Center for Rural
fdassachusetts. the Conservation
Foundation. and Scenic America
believe that we can protect rural
America. We know the way. they say,
but •ae need the will. Several of these
organizations will participate in the
NASAA '69 session. on "Design in the
Rural landscape." on Friday
afternoon, November 10.
In response to an overwhelming
interest by state arts agencies in the
topic. this issue of State Arts Design
Arts focuses on the rural landscape
and what we can do in a very
practical way to preserve it.
Meg Maguire, Editor
Visualizing Land Use Decisions in the Rural Landscape
It has always been hard for
planners to communicate the implii:a-
tions of land use regulations. Laymen
and municipal officials have difficulty
visualizing how a zoning change will
effect the physical development of, say,
a strip of state highway.
Now, however, through a tech-
nique called "visual simulation" people
can see what zoning and subdivision
regulations will produce. The idea is
composed of three parts. First, today's
conditions are illustrated; second, based
on current zoning and land use regula-
tions, the situation as it would appear in
five years is simulated ~~isualh•; finally,
based on a revised set of "considerate"
regulations, the appearance of an alter-
native version is produced. one that is
the result of good planning.
An exce]lent example of how ~zsual
simulation works has recentl~• been
published - amacro-planning docu-
ment that de~•elops alternative futures
for the center st::p of Massachusetts.
Called Dealing with Cbange in the
Connecticut Ri;: er l~alley:.~ Design
.Ylanual for. Conser ~•ation and De:•elop-
mrnt, the work was carried out b}• The
Center for Rural Massachusetu and
published by The Lincoln Institute of
Land Policy. Regarded as a seminal
work, the book has received awards
from the American Societti• of Land-
scape Architects and the ~iational Trust
for Historic Preservation.
The manual addresses the need to
accommodate growth while respecting
the unique natural and historic ele-
ments of the icon we 1•now as the
traditional New England villave. The
authors accommodate today's-lifest<•le
and property development e~•pectaaons
while preserving the livabilit~~ and em-i-
ronmental quality that gives rise to the
desire to live there. In simple terms,
these guidelines offer a way to keep
from "killine the goose" - in this case,
the wonderful vistas, landscapes and
buildings that make up the rural
Connecticut River Valle~•.
"In the past two weeks alone, two
developer have come voluntarily to see
us," says Randall Arendt, Associate
Carr. ar pq. _'
.Typical house•lot development destroys rural
character. Conventional zoning and subdivision
regulations consume entire track for house lots
and streets. Typical municipal road standards
produce excessively wide thoroughfares which
encourage h~gn speed traffic.
Cluster housing based on historic settlement
pattern. Open space zoning preserves open
space by requiring new development laid out in
the tradition of a typical compact villaoe or town.
Rural viAage prior to development.
Dear State~Regionai
Arts Agencies:
Since pining the Endowment's
Design Arts Program in March, t've
tlravekd to Catifomia, Georgia,
~irrois, Minnesota, and Texas. to the
caning nronMs 1'll be visiting the
Fbrtheast and Florida. My goal is to
seam about regional, stile and local
design issares first hand. By
understanding the concerns of your
constituents we can shape the
direction of our Program to rtspond
to your needs swiftly and with
precision.
Everywhere 1've been I have
found enormous enthusiasm for the
potential of design to create a more
humane, considerate and beautiful
public realm. This is at the top of our
priority list. We can help with our
grant and initiative programs, but the
doing gets done at the local level.
Where you are. We understand that,
~ we are developing new attorts fo
address your ambitions.
The Mayors' Institute for City
Design, now in its fourth year, is
being expanded after its shakedown
period in Virginia, to the South (New
prisons}, Midwest (Minneapolis), and
West (Btriceley). We will be working
with the Architectural Foundation
(part of the AIA) b extend its
excellent "Search for Shelter"
program iMo the area of law income
housing. And finally, we will mount
"Your Town," a nationwide design•
asSlStanCe Kral inltlatiVE that will
concentrate on towns, villages and
the spaces between cities.
We strangfy advocate that each
state develop adesign-oriented
eanponent, for only then is our
Program able to provide effective
support There's a long way b go:
only seven states have a full program
and about t5 others have a shared
portfolio setivity.
He,+,ember, our Washington start
and network of Regional
t9eprestntatives wn provide the vital
background information you need.
!Randolph M.N. McAusland
Director, Design Arts Program
Iowa Arts Council Initiates Town Sc_'~*~s Program
"A town square is to a communin•
what a photo album and famil~• room
ue to a family. It is a place for collec-
tive memory of important events and
people and a place where communin•
life can flouish. Looking co another
communin• for ideas for tour town
square is like wading photo albums and
family rooms with your neiehbor."
It-lark Chidistrr,
lo-~:a State L'nrversity
In 1987 the Iowa
Arts Council convened
19 top design and devel-
opment experts to focus
on one of the state's
most endearing charac-
teristics: the town
squares in the many
small farming communi-
ties. The aim of the
program is to encourage
townwide revitalization
using new or redesigned
central squares as a focal
point.
1~ine communities
ranging in population
from 1,000 to 8,000 par-
ticipated in design plannin, ~~ orkshops
and were invited to submit applications
for matching grams. In June, 1989
Governor Terrv Branstad announced
the selection of five communities for
funding.
The Arts Council awarded $45,000
to Vlinterset (pop. 4200), birthplace of
the actor John Wavne, for design and
rede~•elopment of the existing town
square. The town of Lamoni (pop.
0 ~) received $8000 to design a new
town square in an existing city park. A
group of artists,
architects and land-
scape architects will
convene for three
days in each commu-
nity to design squares
that meet the func-
tional and aesthetic
goals outlined by each
town in its applica-
non.
Three other
towns have received
$2000 grants for
technical assistance to
further dr~•elop their
proposals. Iowa
Town Squares is
funded be the Iowa
state legislature.
For more infor-
mation, contaa ;`;atolls Hala, Executive
Director, Iowa Arts Council. Capitol
Complex, Des Moines, IA X0319.
Visualizing Land Use
Curn. from pq. I
Director of the Center. "In just rwo
hour I redesigned a com•entional
subdivision so-that it incorporates
adequate open space guidelines."
Instead of lot sizes. setbacks and
cul-de-sacs, we are presented with "be-
fore" and "afrer" perspecti~•e drawings.
The manual is as much a design teach-.
ing tool for the general public as it is a
manual for professional planners and
landscape architects. Funher, it
represenu a regional approach to
development planning thar must bC
serioush viewed as the reasonable way
to solve environmental, transportation
and development needs. ~~'ithout such
cooperation and discussion among
municipalities, apiecemeal approach
often results in the familiar strip de~'el-
opment and open-field subdivision that
robs the undrrhing character and
livabilin• of places.
"You can live lecture. but unril the
town revelations are chanrd to require
open space w•e won't see p~r,irive
results." said Arendt. In the past year
~~ e'ee already had at least six ~Iassachu-
stns towns change their regulations in
line ~~•ith our recommendations."
Thr Center serves as the principal
technical assisrance advisor to the Rural
Design Assistance Program of the Mas-
sachusetu Council on the Arts and Hu-
manities. The manual promises to be
useful to other state arts agencies in
addressing rural and small community
design issues.
For more information contatt
Randall Arendt, The Center for Rural
~lassachuseta at the Universin• ofMas-
sachuserts, .~nherst, MA, 01003
1413)3•+3-?:~~. Mr. Arendt is available
to present his slide show and lecture
throughout the country.
T'o order a copy of the manual,
send S?7.50 to: The Lincoln Institute
of Land Policy, 26 Trowbridge St.,
Cambridge. ~'IA 02138, Attn: Charles
~~•aIis, (61-)661-3016.
~ National Trust Rural Preservation, Tourism and Main Street Programs
ti Offer New Opportunities for State Partnerships
The National Trust for Historic
Preservation is looking for new state
and tocat partners on three initiatives
affecting the rural landscape.
The Rural Preservation Initiative
directed by long-time rural expert and
activist, Nl`arilvn Fedelchak, has three
aims: 1. to increase the capacity of the
Trust to respond to rural needs; 2. to
shape public policl• on the national,
state and local levels; and 3. to develop
new programs.
"Small rural communities are
eking us for design assistance. In a
recent phone survey of L' .Main Sveet
communities under 10,000 (pop.), 10
requested design assistance, "says
Fedelchak. "State arts agencies can
promote both economic development
and preservation through their design
are programs. Partnerships with state
are agencies have shown great promise
and wwe hope the collaboration will
continue."
The Trust's latest rural assistance
publication, Sa-~ing.9»rerica'.r Coun~ry-
side: ,9 Guide ro Ruro1 Conser,;atiorr,
presents 28 case studies of communities
from Vermont to Hawaii. The book is
helping small communities take charge
of their own destinies b~- providing
step-by-step detail on how' co organize a
consen•ation effon, inventon• available
resources, work for effective new laws,
sec up land trusts, take advantage of
federal programs, and involve the public.
The Tourism Initiative is de-
signed to heighten awareness of historic
resources within the travel industry and
to educate the preservation community
on the value of tourism. Initially the
Trust will work with four states~to help
communities develop long-term grass-
roots tourism strategies for marketing
historic resources and other atmetions
to the traveling public.
The budget for the program is 52.E
million dollars, funded by a NEA
Challenge grant of 3300,000 with a 3-
to-1 match prodded by four states plus
corporations and foundarions.
The Main Street Center works
primaril}• with states and offers broad
opportunities for state are councils to
be pan of a team to assist small com-
munities. One of the most celebrated
Trust programs, the Center has assisted
at least X00 communities in 30 states
during its ten year history. "We're still
beginning programs in new tow-ns,"
sa}'s Billy Parrish, Director of the
Center. "But our most critical chat-
Ienge now• is to move from re~italiza-
tion to management. Communities are
beginning to realize that long-term
management is much slower and harder
than then had envisioned at the outset.
The key to sustaining revitalization is
to sustain good management along
main street."
Parrish and his staff of 25 plan to
offer more advanced information and
services on real estate issues, design
management, and financing business
improvement districu to Main Street
towns.
"ti~'e need design professionals to
work with business people. to show that
good design is smart business."
For more information on services
and publications ,contact the National
Trust for Historic Preservation, 1 i 85
l~lassachusetcs Ave., \`VV, ~~'ashington,
DC 200.16.
P
SCENIC AMERICA CHALLENGES BILLBOARD INDUSTRY
Almost nothing wdl destroy the comrrwnities set controls on signs trees on public land and promoting
distinctive dwracter of a community and billboards, and to strengthen cigarettes and alcohol next to
fas'tat than iurcorrtrolled signs and federal controls on visual pollution. churches, homes and playgrounds.
biboards. Scenic America, formery 'A drive for pless<ue feels more pmtiatlariy in minority
known as the Coalition for scenic Bce a dove through the Yelbw cteighbonhoods. The trashing of
Beauty, has manned a rart>paign Pages,' says Ed filcMahon, tfis coumry oast stop.'
b haft the spread of billboard bight Executive Direcdor of Scenic For moot information cornact
Though the Center for Sign Control America. "The Highway Scenic America, 216 7th St, SE,
the organization provides Beautification Act, ttteartt to control Washington, DC 20003,
iMormation, technical assistance billboards along federal highways. a (20Z)546-t 100.
and kigal expertise to help a failure. Billboards are destroying
State and Regional
Perspectives
Massachusetts Funds Rural Design
Projects
Through the Rural Design
Assistance Program a total of 1 i small
towns, each with a population under
10,000, has received grants from the
Massachusetts Council. In awarding
the grams former Executive Director
Anne Hawley noted: "The design of
our buildings, our streeu, and our
neighborhoods are as much a reflec-
tion of who w•e are and how w•e live as
is any painting, sculpture or dance
performance."
On the new provision to incorpo-
rate an education component for
school children she said: "Rural design
projects give schools a wonderful
opportunin- to offer curricula on
zoning,brir3ge technology, architec-
ture ....These can be combined with
actual field trips to their ow•n commu-
nities and meetings with the profes-
sionals making the decisions."
The Council is just completing a
primer on basic design issues for com-
munin• members and professionals, as
well as a Grridebool; to Selerred Projects i»
Desig~r Educariorr.
Kansas Sponsors "Building by
Design: A Design Arts Symposium"
Attracting neark 100 participants
in the middle of Au;ust, the I::tnsas
Arts Commission held its first design
arts conference to encourage arts
organizations and communin• lenders
co integrate design of cultural facilities
into eommunin• planning and state
economic growth.
"This Was the first time .~•e've all
talked to each ocher," said Dorothy
Agen, Executive Director. "ll'e've
already stared what promises to be a
long and productive collaboration.
One step we've taken is to incorporate
the grant guidelines for historic
preservation right into our capital
program guidelines. We're all on the
same side of the street and we didn't
know it. It's really snowballing!"
As a result of the conference, the
Dept. of Commerce which operates
the Alain Street program will now
draw on the Commission to provide
technical assistance to smart to~rns that
are planning cultural programs or
converting historic buildings to per-
forming arts space.
vermont mans t>tovemor s
Conference on Design and
the Suitt Environment
Under the leadership of
Joanne Chow Winship, Executive
Director of the Vermont ARs
Council, Governs Madeleine
Ktrnin will host the Governor's
Conference on Design and the
Butlt Environment. Scheduled for
November 3,1989 the conference
Mnll be the first Conprehensive
examination of tfte design issues
facing Vemrorrters who are
shaping future buildings, villages,
dries and towns. Architects.
landscape architects, planners,
preservationists, builders.
developers and state offirtials will
come together for a one day
Conference on opportunities and
obstacles to good design in
Vermont.
Executive Directors
Discuss Design Arts
i At the suggestion of Jonathan
Katz, Director of the National
' Assembly of State Arts Agerraes,
executive directors from eight
states met following the April
NASAA meeting to discuss their
new or expanding design arts
programs. ED's from Vermont,
tltah. Northam Marianas. Hawaii,
' Kansas, Iowa, Arkansas. and
Idaho. and staff from New York
State, attended the one-day
workshop organized by
Environmental Images under
cooperative agreement with the
i NEA.
On August 3. Adrienne Hirsch
and Randy McAustand convened
the first rrreenng of the State Artsl
Design Arts Advisory Group.
Executive directors from Vemront,
I Arizona, Iowa, Arts Midwest. and
NASAA offered irnaluable
suggestions on the future of tfre
program.
On October 27.28 tfre first
design arts regional workshop for
executive directors will be frosted
by the Rhode Island State Coundl
on the Arts for states in the
Northeast. Fa more iMorrtra6on,
I contact Buff Kavetman,
I (212) 614.2900.
1/esrgn Hrts r-ta to
NASAA Neighborhood
Tour
kl what promises t0 b8 a fuq
acrd lively design arts program at
ttre 1989 NASAA conference, state
srts agency assistant directors and
design arts coordinators will visit
sites off the tourist beat on
Thursday afternoon, November 9.
The tour will be hosted by the O.C.
Commission on the Arts and
Humanities, and Ernironmental
knages, Inc.
To hegMen awareness of
design issues, each participant trill
be asked to bring a camera and
shoot one roll of film of interesting
design details encountered on the
tour. The D.C. Design Arts
Program wilt process two prints of
the photos: one set will go to the
photographer as a record of the trip
and the other set will be kept by the
Design Arts Program as a visual
commentary on the sites visited.
The bus-photo tour will highlight
the history and architecture of some
of Washington's neighborhoods,
showing the role that arts facilities
can play in Community revitalization.
The group will visit several sites
which have received design arts
grants from the DC Commission.
After a box lunch at the
Anacostia Museum of black history
and culture, the group will move to
Eastern Market on Capitol Hill,
Dance Place in Brookland,
Shepherd Park. Adams Morgan, the
Studio and Source Theaters on
14th St. The tour will end with a walk
down t 7th St. and a reception at the
Sumner School where participants
will meet members of the D.C.
Design Arts Committee.
Other design arts activities at
the NASAA Conference include a
peer group discussion on
Wednesday, November 8;
breakfast, orientation and a walking
tour of PerrnsyNania Avenue,
America's main Main Street on
Thursday, November 9; and a
concurrern panel, "Design and the
Rural Landscape," on Friday,
November 10 featuring leaders of
national and state rural preservation
programs.
4
tvei~ uea-yn wr is
Program Regional
Associates
The Design Arts Program has
seven reg~nal assoaates who are
available for consultatan on desgn
issues such as establishurg a design
arts program or appying for grants.
New Errgknd (CN, ME, MA, NH,
NJ, NY, PR, RI, VT)
BuH Kavelman 212~t42900
New York State Councl on the Arts
915 Broadway
New York, NY 10010
Wddk Atlantic (DE, DC, KY, MD,
OH, PA, WV, VA)
Tan Walton 202~t55188
Department of Architecture and
Planning
The Catholic University of America
620 Michigan Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20064
Southeast (Al, AR, FL, GA. LA,
MS. NC, SC, TN)
Douglas Allen 104.8943846
Couege o1 Architecture
Georgia Institute of Tec:hnoiogy
Atlanta, GA 30332 .
South Central (AR, tA, OK M0. TX)
Drexei Turner 713527.8101
Rice University
School of Architecture
P.0. Box t 892
Houston, TX 77251.1692
Southwest (AZ. CO, NM, WY, UT)
Roger Schtuntt 602.965.3536
Dept. of Architecture
Arizona State University
Tempt. AZ 85287
Far West (CA, NV, HW, SAMOA,
GUAM, N. MARIANAS)
Christine Cinciripini 213253791
140 S. Roxbury - •9
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
NoRhrre•t (AK, ID, MT, OR, WA)
Karen Gates Hildt . 2063857039
P.0. Box 277
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Central Midwest
(WI, IL, MI, IN)
Jell Olswang
School of Architecture and lkban
Planning University of Wiscorrsm
Milwaukee, WI 53201
(ND, SD, MN,10, NE, KS)
Stacy Moriarty
Boz 3213
45th Ave., S.
Minneapolis, MN 55406
uaatyltru w nrrN
Publications
• Artists in Space: A Handbook
for Developing Artists' Studio
Spaee. by Jero Nelson. Contact
Fora Point Arts Community, 249 A
St., Boston, MA 02210.
• Design in State Government:
M Mtroduction for Legislators,
by Anthony J. Radish. Contaa the
National Conference of State
Legislature5,1050 Seventeenth
Street, Suite 2100, Denver, CO
80265.
• Protecting America's Historic
Countryside. A comprehensive
report on the rural preservation
activities of the Trust.
• Barn Again! A Guide to
N•habllffation of Older Farm
Buildings. Both available from the
National Trust fa Historic
Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts
Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036.
• Guidebook to Selected
Projects in Design Education,
Massachusetts Council on the Arts
and Humanities, 80 Boylston St.,
10th floor, Boston, MA 021 t6.
• By Design II. Catalogue of NEA
Design Arts grants since 1976 by
topic. Contact Partners for Livable
Places.1429 2t St., Washington,
DC 20036.
(Also note those pubiications
mentioned in the text of this issue.)
Videotapes
• Cresting Artists' Space.Time
t t :00. Produced by the
Massachusetts Council on the Arts
and Humanities, 80 Boylston Street,
10th floor, Boston, MA 02116.
• Washington Grove: Town
Wtthin a Forest. Time: 28:50. The
story of an historic community in
suburban Maryland and its
Successful efforts to maintain a
special way of I'rfe. Produced by
MaguirelReeder, 300 I St., NE,
Washington, DC 20002. Price: S90
plus 53.00 shipping and Handling
Published through a cooperative !
agreement belrveen the Design Arts
Program o(the National
Endowment for ttre Arts and: ,
Environmental Images, Inc.
Suite 101
300 Eye Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002
1`
ff
I
8/8 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION
(request: Lapin)
8/15 UUCWD/TOV LAND CONTRACT
8/15 NO SMOKING ORDINANCE
2/13 TIME PARAMETERS FOR COUNCIL
MEETINGS (request: Rose)
2/20 JOINT MEETING COUNCIL/UMRD
2/27 SATELLITE POST OFFICE (request:
Osterfoss)
3/13 PURCHASE PRICE Of PUBLIC PARK-
ING SPACES (request: Lapin)
3/13 TRIANGLE OF GREEN. SPACE ADJACENT
TO VILLAGE CENTER
3/13 EUROFAIRE/JOHN HORAN-KATES
(request: Rose)
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
3/23/90
Page 1 of 1
FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for
annexation.
RON: Contract in final stages of negotiation.
LARRY/SUSAN: Organize study group to examine
voluntary options.
LARRY/RON: Define time procedure for conduct of
meetings.
PAT: 1. Develop design/cost structure for construc-
tion of public restroom/shower facility/storage
at athletic field - return to Council for
reprioritization far capital projects.
2. Apply in writing to Council re: ground lease
of Booth Creek 9 hole par 3 golf course.
LARRY: Prepare amendment to TOU/VMRD agreement re:
transfer of mill levy and not holding an election
within the required 2 year period of time.
RON: Pursue station "in town" and/or increase
summer .bus service?
KRISTAN/LARRY: .Reconsider pricing to equate to
actual cost of constructing new spaces.
RON/LARRY: Contact re: possible gift to the Town?
LARRY: Contact Pat re: copy of UMRD's contract?
Council approval of stock transfer clause
inclusion.
Petitions are being circulated.
Letter on possible soil contamination problems sent to
UVCWD. Return letter received. Kent and Ron to meet with
Bill George and Ed Drager.
Draft ordinance to be submitted to Council for review March
27.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION to be moved up earlier on evening
agenda. Existing ordinance is redrafted for consideration
April 3.
Pat has developed these and Ron has a copy. Proposed cost is
naw $150,000.
Kent sent letter outlining proposed process to Tim Garton.
UMRD is reviewing and will respond after 3/28.
Larry and Steve Barwick are working on the amendment.
Meeting to be set up with Ernie Chavez.
Old ordinance will be resurrected.
Will do.
Pat has sent to Larry. Contract to be reconsidered April 3.
3/13 ZONING CODE CHANGE I KRISTAN/TOM: Review 15,000 sq. ft. lot size on I Memo in Council packets.
single family lots..
PRESENT:
Betty Neal
B311 Bishop
Kevin Cassidy
Pam Brandmeyer
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 1990
10:00 A.M.
SWEARING IN BILL BISHOP
1. Consideration of the Board of the following
modifications of premises:
a. Red Lion Inn, Inc., dba, the Red Lion Inn
Restaurant
b. Eagle Restaurant Corp., dba, Cyrano's
c. Up the Creek Bar and Grill, Inc., dba, Up the
Creek Bar and Grill
2. Consideration of the Board of the following
corporate structure changes:
a. Antlers Condominium Association
1) Dan Havekost, President - replacing
Jerome Darnell
2) Jerome Darnell, Vice-President - replacing
Jacque Oakes
3) Jacque Oakes, Secretary - replacing Joe
Looper
4) Eric Stromberg, Treasurer - replacing
Dan Havekost
b. Starr Pizza Slices, Inc., dba, Rocky Rococo
Pan Style Pizza
1) John E. Hickey, President - replacing
Bart Starr
2) John Hansen, Vice-President - replacing
Robert A. Long
3) Robert A. Long, Secretary - remains the
same
4) Robert A. Long, Treasurer- where a
vacancy had occurred
c. K-B Ranch Company, Inc., dba, KB Ranch
1) James J. Scalise, Jr., Secretary -
replacing June Sadler
3. Notification of the Board of the following:
a. Rafih Benjelloun, dba, Mataam Fez Moroccan
Restaurant, to A. Rafih Benjelloun, dba, the
Imperial Fez Restaurant/Change of Name Only
4. Consideration of the Board of a manager registration
for Lodge Properties, Inc., dba, the Lodge at Vail -
Adalberto Mario Stratta.
5. Notification of the Board of recent renewals:
a. Charles H. Rosenquist/Richard N. Brown, dba,
the General Store
b. Steven Satterstrom, Inc., dba, Batch's Restaurant
at the Clubhouse
c. Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., dba, the Bully III
d. Woo's Co., Inc., dba, the May Palace Restaurant
6. Discussion of May 1990 Liquor Authority meeting.
7. Any other matters the Board wishes to discuss.
a. Update on Optional Premises local licenses.
ABSENT:
Steve Simonet t.
Colleen McCarthy
Continued to 4-11-90.
Continued to 4-11-90.
Continued to 4-11-90.
Unanimously approved.
Continued to 4-11-90.
Unanimously approved.
So notified.
Unanimously approved.
Unanimously approved.
Unanimously approved.
Unanimously approved.
Unanimously approved.
Quorum will be available.
Update from Rick Sackbauer
w/Batch's Restaurant at the
Clubhouse.
lowo o(~ai
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2107
office of town attorney
March 20, 1990
Mr. Abraham L. Shapiro
P. U. Box 1448
Vail, Colorado 81658
RE: Unplatted Vacant Land
Lionsridge Filing No. 1
Dear Abe:
It appears from your letter that you were given incorrect information from
Arlene Montag. Indeed, Mrs. Montag was correct in indicating to you that
the land was dedicated to the County of Eagle at the time the Lionsridge
Subdivision was platted. However, the annexation map of 1975, and
Ordinance No. 26, were both properly recorded on the land records of Eagle
County. Further, the annexation procedure which was followed regarding
the Lionsridge Subdivision was proper and that land. is clearly a part of
the Town of Vail. The roadway dedication you are concerned with which was
initially made to the County on the plat map is now considered by law to
be a dedicated roadway of the Town of Vail. The Town of Vail has the
right by State statute to vacate that roadway, but upon vacation, each
side of the roadway beginning with the center line would transfer by
operation of law to the adjacent property owners.
If you have any questions regarding the actions of the Town of Vail or the
law relating to street abandonment, please call.
Very truly yo s
f.~ S.
l~'}Jt
Lawre ce A. Eskwith
Town Attorney
LAE/bsc
,, ~ ~' ~ v
~~ ~~
V ~ ~~ .
~l,`f..C?!Y !
-~ ~_
~ ~ f~" i
' ~ ~~ ~~~, V' ~~~
Q L~
~~ /;! ~~ .
~~
a, U ~ ~ a .
~,
O - ~ ~ G-,G~J~ /~~ dV PJl/ ~u~ ~'~/~~C{r'tt,.L c, ,rc.~ ~C:c , C ~t.;'~.~ /W t.~-~
~ ,,~
//~~, l/^jy~,{~(JAn/ o/ ~~~~~/ 4''~C' ~~4'~~ ! 7w„r "~ ice' Y~+~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~
I ~ ~ 1 / ~ .
''w ~ ~ U
~~~%~
~~ ~ "/_
~~~ ~ ~ ~
~~
ate. .~%~u-a- /~ .~c~~~_ r~~~~
~'~ ~ ~
.~~ 195'. a~.~. ~/,~~~,~'-~-~ ;c .~~'~'~ ~~~~
.~ ~
~~
F~
~; t~
I _ ~~D~
r~ p, f~+ I 1 ~GU~~~
~~~ / - p ~ n
_. ~f J~~ '~( i~°~" Mid Ar~~ ~.~'~~ r0'Z~v3'1
/~
~I~~ ~
C t~ w ~ _,
I~
-- :.
,;
.. ~ ~ Y ~
~.-- - a
.~ :,
r l
~p ~ ,~ -,
i.,, -
,.
` '~
l ,`
~. , ._ . ~-
~.~:t1pL
--
r ~ w ~ ts, ','IW Kam`
' ` w J
~.
'~ ~
_ ,. a.-,~
___ _ ._.
i~i~~~ ~ J .f~M f
i
~ . ` .. ,
/V ~'V.
P~
.~..___ ;
----
I! _ -
~ ~'. z
,sA ..~~ ~ -~~ ~ ~a~ 4 M ~-''- ~y ~ ~ ~~ ~`-~ 1 "ten ~. -'~~ ~~j ~ ~t
~~ a~ ~~r },~~~ -~ _ ~{~ ~.;L _ ~ rr ~? -17„'~~6'~'~~ ,~'5~ •r• ~F: t-r ~S i:~ 1 ~ :,F'c ~, -~~ ry, "~~_
,~ '~'~ +, ~` ~'~V ~r ~ ~{~~. i>. ~~ ;;' ;~~~',1~~~c ~t)~L"..i~~ ` _ ~ ~~ '.max ~ y ,,{i~ ..kY ~~-
~~ J/ t t ~~~ ` `~,jA `~' G" ~ t ~^ j
:x~~ t` 4..- _ c~/ \ ~ l'~AY I3 3~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,_f r~~" ,.av 2. _
,°+~ ,;~~ '~~,~ F'' e^ t~r ~} ~~ ~` ++ ~ '\_\ ~'L.`;~. ~` ~~ 4 4} 4... 'tea _ n ` u~'~ t-, Y
` ~~
t 4
_,.-~-~-~.'r ~~ ; ,e ~~(~ a ~' {~, ~ ~ - ` ~ l t ~' - _ _~ ' r-
p ,.
v2 ~{ ~ n
~ '~' ~`~ _
i Y K .,
~- w ~ ~ _ .
r _~
~~ ~ ~ t _
i
Y - a a ~" .^~ ° Imo/
;fir ~ ,y * i ~.. ,~ _ l 3 s,: sR~• ~ t" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-.. ~d"a ~~fi'L• ~~ f ~ ~--t . ~f~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~..:
_ `I ,rnr
`~ _
r~
r, f ~ ~ ~ ~7°a ~ ~ ,~~~ ~ . n z ~_.
:; .`...
Abstract of Assessments
1988
a ~
o d
° ° ~ r T M M
O O 40 ~ aD _ O~ ~ M
TAXING r ~ M
c4 r~ m o~ o N r m ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ao ~ r ~ ~- ~ ~ v m
JURISDICTIONS ° M _q 8v ~ ~ r m m~ rn ~ o N c7 M~ v r~ ~ ~ o ~ m? o? N ~ M~ <? ,n ~- ~ r m~ u~ m ~ tD ro~ rn v o 0 o M V v
O Q O m O m O m O m O! 0< 0 I~ 0~ O O ~ O e- O i~ ~ r ~ ~ 0~ NO U N r' N" N V N C ~ ~ M~ M~ M r M ~ V .- O ~ O V V r
O m O m O m O m O W O LLJ O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O
ow oC'3 oC7 oC7 0~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ o~ om om om om o¢
TOTALS 85.471 80.106 70.180 63.945 70.374 78.388 72.092 70.823 51.354 68.261 66.953 50.331 54.890 78.194 50.593 50.787 65.202 70.259 47.138 50.008 67.245 124.879 49.983 67.220 54.247 74.121 64.195 64.838 85.062 74.089
,~.~rr. ~ a 55,0 o ~.:~ .~ ~.~c ~ ~,~~a ~ i s-. , - . ~, ~ ~ 3,::5 :3 .:5~0 ~ ..~ ~ ~a ..~ . ~ ~.t;0u ~ - ~ 0.550 9.55.E '~ .,0- ~.s59 9.559 9855 dr",5., i 3 SS: 3.6:;9 9.559 9.555 ..0.. ~ 9.55a ..33 9.559
~~ ~~. ~_~~ 1.500 ~ _.___ V VvV 1.500 i _.~__ V vVV ~ V~vJV ~ 1 1.5001 ?.500: ~~ I 1500 ~~ 1.500 I 7.500 I 1.5001 1.500 7.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 '~ 1.500 11.500 1.500 J .,; ! 1.500 l 1.500
t, a alt '_ ~ ~n ~ 1 94d 1 P44 i 1..944 x.944 1.944 I 1.944 I I ~ ~ ~ ~i I 7.944
'~ i,.,,. '~ 1 ~ _. ~~1 ~~ ~.., ~ _:.3 -,i~ 4.913 4.913 4.913 491 ' ~~ i ~: ~ s i--~ i- i ~i 4.913 4.913 4.913 4913
~ 4913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.91;
~ r ~ U ,t _. RF 5C.1 ~ "a",~. _ ~~ I ~ .'3 _~ 29 '~ ?9.'_1 ~ _~ 3...~ I _ '~ 29 _. ~ ..._ ..
29 3 " 3'J
' ' ~. ~ _..,~ ~..,~ _, - -
?9.327
Srri, t~i ~ =F ~ J ~1 '.. ~ ~ -. ~ 47.33f
I - Di,tnct JT- ~
.~,, 33`r,r
- --' '
1
,
E3~a11. :.~ ~ ~. ~.~1? ~ ..~1~
ll
I I, S.U14
i
T ..
~n '
. ~
~
i .
i
~ ~.'Psurr T a.,, ,;
~ --
I i ~ 1 i I
~
i
3 135 ~
- _
~
- __
~
Mn,~.ir ~, ~ :. ~,,.
~.
~~ i
'1.251
Fc.rir~i T,,,. i
- - ~ I ~ ~ ~ '~ ',
~
65.097
V~ ~
.1ai H r,,,r,,,.: I~ '~ I
~'
~ ~
~
_ '.
)~_'.F, a i5 _. +n,
c i,
6 -'-. ~ ,. ~. i ..=-: 'x.643 ~,.~ ~. i ~.,~, i
Mi~u i~r, -n Ni.-. Y. iii ~ ~ I ~i. 25 ~ 0.025
! 0 0.0251 0.025 ~
Ba ~ ~ i .,
-
,,, - ~ o--
_
~ __
_
-
_ -
___.
,~t=~ ~,.1I Firr:
~
r ~~ I. ~,
i 4.5`•9 4.x,59 a 5n~1 ~,
- 4.559
,
G.i. r
Arrowhead Metro. i
Avon Metro. ~ 1 _
~
t ,s,-~r ~: r.:~F h1~tr;. ~.
i
' i ~ ~
Bel i i ~
~
-
_
- -
~
__ -I .
I _
-
~...
_
'
~
~auc
.1r,nu
Eagle-Vail Metre.
i
17.237 ~
17.237
c;iwartls Metro. I
Mid Valley Metro. i I
i ~ ~
'. a( t,i ~. I.,.. F, ,
I
i
'
i
'
^r'~ F Co. P~r
i
~ f
~~ i ~ I
, 11 -(i
.15 !
150 i
. i
C.14ii _
~
_
_.-.
__ --
_
~ ~
i I I I 3.141 ~~
~ I I
i
0,709
0.709
0.7^^ I
0.709
Q709
i - i ~
V .. -
I -..~
i
2.161
2.161
2.1
2.161
2.161
R, lcii`t ,t 5,~~
`~ ~
~.
~l
~'i - ~ - -
~ -
i -
i _ r fig
vai :', ~_ ~~ I ~.
Pa I1 V r ~.:~~r.~. ~ u. w I _ 5 194 ~2.~94 t-194 I !). L`~s ~, '. ~'~ 0.194 ~ ~ ', ~ 0.194
bt41 ..
1.944 1.944
4.913 4.913 4 913 4.913
2~ L7 ?9.327
47.330 I a " -
I _'.1,. ~IIh
I I
i
0.643
5
0.709 '"~7r'9
2.161 ~.Ili1
J e. tli:er 4°~ater Cons. 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 O.~t-19 'i 0.449 7 449 ~ ;.a~.9 0-549 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ O.A49 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 r 0.449 0.449 { 0.449
VVI ..i Ja1P~ I
~ i
~
,. ,n F'. ~ ~ ...I'.., i i it
~~'ll ~~I~~.'f Tlt'1. :~J n1 L?f i ~. ~ I, i
fall Valle Cons. Wa er
y t i
I
i
tali Village West Water I ' ~ ~
~ i ~ I ~
~ I ~ ~
~ ~
,~ c
F 1. E, ~ =r. Hs[: 7 9F5 ~i ~i d75 1 ,.. '~ 1 _-. ~.,._ ii', :,,=
~.. ~ E.i ~„ I .i. ~ 1 ~.1 -~4i. 14,E 1 ~
TOTAL X54'1 30 _ i rr J-
~'~S ~B, J4F ]-3I417r o.72.. .. ..354 ,_,1 ~0~,-1~.~~~13:, ~ -: n9S~ x134 ~'~~"~+, ~G ~_ Jb`a~ ~ ~ ,7d~:,+9n:b~ `:.y ':11~
7 c ~ I 1-St.`r
65 155 6,- I~ F5 9~•2 75. ~.d9
m rn
~
c~ ~
COUNTY ASSESSOR m ~
G.J. (Jody) Caruthers
B
449
0 ~
ox rn
o~
COUNTY CLERK. ~ ~ n
Johnnette Phillips o ~ o
Box 537 0o cfl
J
COUNTY TREASURER ~'`'
1 ,~
Mary E. Walker ,,,~
Box 479
COUNTY SHERIFF (/~
A. J. Johnson (/~
Box 359 ['rJ
COUNTY SURVEYOR ~
James Kunkel
COUNTY CORONER
Donna Meineke
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
George (Bud) Gates
Richard L. Gustafson
Donald H. Welch
Box 850
COUNTY SEAT
Eagle, Colorado 81631
Phone: (303) 328-7311
ABSTRACT
OF
ASSESSMENTS
EAGLE CO(1I`ITY
COLORADO
FOR THE YEAR
1989
Toll Free Numbers:
From Basalt/EI Jebel: (303) 927-3823
From Vail/Avon: (303) 949-5257
As Approved By
The County Board of Equalization
State Division of Property Taxation
The State Board of Equalization
TAXING AREAS
M
r
m
m~
a s
07
a
~
ro
mn
a s
O W
~
~
ar
OQ
~
'9
a
m~
a~
O tl1
a
ry'
a U
O S
r
~
N
Oq
O W
o
m
tf1 O
O
O m
m
r
~
Nco
O
O~
O W
o
~
N
O r
O Q1
a
o
a~
m W
O>>
O>
~
°J
m
my
N~
O W
O
a
r
~
rr
mof
O
O U
a
~
r
mr
Npj
O
O W
a
~
r
moi
mn
O
O W
a
r
o°'
m r
O>
O>
m
~
cb
ma
O
O 1
"
r
N01
m~?
O-
O J
r
m
m
M
m~
O
D m
m
~
as
m
O W
O Q
r
1m
m~
O
O Q
~
oo
mN
O
O=
M
r
mN
D
O=
r
m
mO r
O Q
a
~
rr
^On
O U
D
m
Nn
rrp
O
O m
~
~
Mq
rvJ
O
O=
m
v
r
N>
rw
O
O Q
~
m
m~
r
O U
O _I
~
~
m
a
O
Q
O J
m
m
m
N
my
Or
O 1
n
r
~
~
m=
O m
O 1
m
~
~
v
r
m j
OU
O 1
M
r
ro
~
oQ
.~ J
0 1
r
~
ro
~a
r
O~
~
ro
v
r
c~3
"]
O J
~
~
~
m?
r
p~
N
r
m
m
r°
'-
O 1
~
~
a
N¢
N J
O 1
~
°'
co
v
m3
N~
D 1
M
~
~
~
a
~~
N j
O U N
W
a
r
3
N 1
p U
,
r
m
m
°
ryr
p~
56723 60.348 82.601 i 76.366 ~ 49.688 i 55.625 56.107 69.775 ?2.403 53.838 72.645 54.743 54 a81 ~ 59.040 58.3971 51.538 55.193 66.483 73.983 71.113 i 51.263 42113 71219 65.418 61.268 80.374 54.133 91.326 61.052
60.108 69.455 57824 60.321 55.177 72.340 74.624 61.654
56.920 56.549 60.139 62.468 61.851 56.469
9 55~ I
~.3ob
°_;53
f <<:
J,
'.,.,d
9x59 «.~
9..,.,3
3.55 - .
~ n
955., a ::a 1
~..,~., ~ ..:.;~
.,..,..., -
4559 I ; c~,c
~.,.,~
9.559 , ~.~.~
J~yJU ~ -~~~
.,.~~., o ., ~: ~
~,...,..,
9,559
9.559 4c,
9.5..~ a . ~:,; s~.i ~
9.~ a .5y ~~
,... ..559 ~~ °.5c
-._-- y -.54 4 55o 0 0,9 ~ °~SI 7 ,5~.1 ~, ,5a ~~ 9 F~59 3.554 a G9d a.55g a 5`3 :1.`,59 4553 9.p59
_._-- .-- -- - ._-- -.--
Y.500 ~
913
4 1500
4
913 1.500
913
4 1.500
~
~ 4
973 ~ 1.500
4
913 I
1.5
00
913
4
1.944
913
4 1.500
4
913
1.944
4
913 1.500
4.913 1.500
4.913 1.500
~
4.913 1.500
4.913 1.500
4.913 1.500 !
4913 1.500
49'3 1.500
4.913 1.500 '
~
i - 1.500
-gin 1.500
~'.l ~ 1.500
4.913 1.500
4.913 1.500
4.913 1.500 ~
4.913 1.500
4.913 ~
1.9
4.91 ~ 1 ~: 500
~1.~ai1 4.913 i 7.500
4.913 L500
4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4.913 4~~ ~ 4 ~1' 1 I ~ '+' -:~v. a.11a
.
29.327 .
29.327 .
. 1~7 ~
~ .
~ 2y. ~- ~ .
.9.-~2? .
:0.127 . .
29.327 . 29.327 ~ ^" ""' 29.327 29.32 ~
I 29.9_ ~ ""~'~
I ''0 ~ ^^ ^~27 <. ,.
~ ~.3.a.: I ~ ~~' ~
_ ^^ 7 ^"',^'I ^9.327 29.327 22'0' I
~ 1 29.321 29327
__.. .29,327 29.321 29.327 29.327 29'2' 29327 29.327 29,327 29327 23 .. 23.+27 ~93~ i ^9.'t2' 2`!.32?~ 29.J27
_ _.~ ~ I
- -_ -
47-330 -- _..
47.330 -.
! -___
' ._
~ a' 330
~
~~~ 24.106 ~i 24.106 : '.106 i i
~
I 8.014 ~,
I ~ I
I ~'
~ ~
__.
_... ~
__._
_-
_ ... _- __. - _ __.. _- -. _. _.. '~.
~'
r
~
6.431
6.431
fi.431 6.431 i i
1 a
6.431 _. _
0.905
'; ~ 0.905 0.905 ~ ~'
643
0 ' 0.643 Q643
0.025 .
~ ~
~ _ _. 0.025 ~
O.D25
...
__
~ _ _- - ~ _ _
0 0.025
uLS... -
0.025
-
0 ,: ~ 0.025
f --
0.0? ~~_5 ~' x,.025
2~
O.D25 ~ 0 L5 ~.
- "0' 1 2`, - r = r
_ _ _ _ _. _ _ -. _ 5.985
4.559
~ ~ ~ ~ 4.559
~ 4.559
~
~ ~ 1
~ ~ 10.675 10.675
24.000 24.000 ~ ~ ~~, I. ~ ~
- 1 11.382
-
(
--
-- I
_ ~
i
15.220
....
_.. ___
_.
__ _
26.383 ~ ~.
~
~ 1...p: '~.~.~ i4.~u_
~
17.237 ,
1
6.572 ~ 18.512 18.512 '~~.
~ 10.000 ~ '
~
1530
~ ~~ t530
_ _ 1 530 1.530 1.530 1.530 1 1 i ..', ~ "~: L`~ ~ i oou i.aau
thou,
i.,-~.
~__.
.
_ 4.150 _. _ -.. __. _ __
4.150 ~_ _,
~
-.
4150 4.150 _
4.150
4.150 -
4.150 -
4.150 . }.. _.
~ 4.150 .
~ - _
4,150 ~ _--
4.150 - -- 4.150 ~ . i
~ ~
1.718 i
i I
1.308 f
I
~
0.709
~
0,109 i
0.709 ~
~
0709
0.709
0.709 i
~ 0.709
0.709
0.709 Q70~
" 7[~?
0.704 0.709
0 709 0.7no I n ~Og n 709 ~ 9.709 ~ ~Og 0 704 i 9 709 ~ 0 X09
l
~
2.161 ~ 2.161 ' 2 16. 2 161 2.161 2.161 2.161 2 161 2161 i ~' ' 2.161 i
2 161 i i ~' i-'~ . I I
f ~ ~
~
0.194
0.194 i
0.194
'i 1
~ 2.315
10.449 G.+a'd 0.449 0.449 OA49 0.449 O.A49 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~~ 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 OA49 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 0.449 ~ 0.449 0,449 0.449 ~ 0.449 ~ D,449 ~ 0.449 ~ i--a9 0.e49 0,449 0,449 ~ 0.449 0 449 ~I 0 a4N
4.864 I
~
_
~
-
}
_
~
__~
~
~
-
13.939
~ ~
i
~ ~~ ~ 4.027 ! :~ii7 ~'~:'.'
~I 3.830 ~ '~i I 3.830 ' i '. ~, O~.tf3D
~ 1.355 ~ I
~
~ 1.355 ~ 1.355 1.355 1.355 1.355 1.355 ~ "_ ~ - i '` ~ '~ 1 '~`~~ ~ 1. 105
_.284 'i 4 i
'Oa ~I
~ ~, 'i 0.000 1
0 000
~
~
1
1.385
1. 6..
I
1 ~~5
~ ~ ,
n ~
~ -~--
1.365 I - -... - - -
~-
~ ~ ,
1 --
1.38',
~ ~ ~
~ hi --
1.385
1.365
1 385
~ -
1,365
~
1.385
~ 1.3b5
-
1.365 _ _
1.365 1.385 _
1.365
1.385 1.366
1 X05 1 3
1 36. t3 , 1.365 7 OR.: i,.Bfi
b5 ~ t3E5 1.365
,~,.. ~ ~
~~ i
~
~ 3.9-~ 3940 3.940 3.94C ~'~
~
3
4
- .,,
Sr ~
.i.34~,
-
,.. ,
od 801
-...
n, F
i .
~ ~J nii~-.
i
.,_
Nn.,~,
-..:
r
. ,.~
,; „
G., ,,, ,~ ,° , ~
. ,,,~. F 1
~. -„ ~
,4_:.... ~ ..I
;._ .
.:1 s.i
, ~
, .., ,.
~. ~'
; : ,_:
~ ~.,. L_
,.
i _ ,
,., ..
;, ±,
~
1 ii
~, ~ i ~
~ _
;
11 ~~
-
a :, ~
50.18
n.,
ya. '
..~.,
`,~
1
;IL52
~
r
~ 32p 1.56.541
~ ~
;.4 ~
5r'' -
r f.
_4"!S _1 85, - ~ i
n 7 r,i'i i i' h: 4`5 15 r'1 i 1~. 27 ~
_,4_. ~h .J ,[ 6, x177 2'
~_. ~ _~ ? .,a~ li ~4.b2e G? 65a
GENERAL INFORMATION COUNTY TAX ITEMIZED
The property tax bill, which you receive each January, IS NO
OF ACRES VALUATION
the result of the assessment process. This assessment .
RESIDENTIAL VALUATION
process generates revenue through property taxes. Tax NEAREST
TEN ooLLARS LEVY REVENUE
(DOLLARS)
bills are collected to pay for local government services. Unlmproved and Improved Land ....... .............. .... $132,115,780
COUNTY PURPOSES
Improvements ...................... .............. ......231,714,030
Personal Property ................... .............. ........4,447,050 General $567,391,930 6.020 $3,415,699
Contingency 567,391,930 .253 143,550
The county assessor's duty is to value property, both TOTAL .:.......:.................. .............. ......368,276,860 Road and Bridge 567,391,930 2.049 1.,162,586
property tax purposes. (Public
real and personal, for Pumic Welfare 587,391,930 .337 .191,211
.
utilities are valued by the State Division of Property Tax• COMMERCIAL capital Expenditures 5s7,391s3o .243 137,876
ation). Her primary responsibility is to determine an Retirement 567,391,930 .262 148,657
equitable value for your property so that you pay only
Unimproved and Improved Land .......
..............
.......57,822,780 msuraneeFund
county Library 5x7,391,930
254,665,610 .395
1.500 224,120
381,998.
your fair share of the taxes. Improvements :..................... .............. .......e7,7a6,o1o Basalt Library 29,491,00D 1.944. 57,331
Personal Property ................... .............. .......23,300,170
INCORPORATED TOW NS
TOTAL ............................ .............. ......168,870,960
Once the value is established, taxing jurisdictions utilize Avon $ 35,344,450 24.106 852,013
the value to determine their mill levies. The result is your INDUSTRIAL Basalt 7,707,140 8.014 61,765
tax bill. The entire process takes a full year to ac. Eagle 11,324sso 7x13 ass12
COmpIISh. Unlmproved andlmprovedLand ....... .............. .........235,030 Gypsum 5,875,D40 9.635 54,679
Improvements ......................
..............
........1,360,000 Mlnturn 4,775,890 20.261 96,777
Radcliff 811,910 65.097 52,853
Personal Property ................... .............. ......... 104,930 Vall 283,235,320 6.431 1,821,488
THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE IS IN NOWAY TOTAL ............................. ............. ........1,699,960 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT AND SERVICE DISTRICTS
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAX LEVIES. AGRICULTURAL
Arrowhead Metropolitan $ tos46,6o0 24.000 262,7x7
Avon Metropolitan 34,104,050 11.362 388,172
Irrigated Land ....................... ...7,233.. , .. .........597,390 Basalt & Rural Fire 29,18Q700 5.985 174,647
Meadow Hay Land ................... ..11,966 ..... .........390,980 Basalt Sanitation 7,657,280 1.718 13,155
PROPERTY TAXES PAY FOR LOCAL SERVICES Grazing Land ....................... ..132,715..... .........627,420 Basalt Water Conservancy 26,835,230 .194 5,206
OtherAg.Land ......................
......13 .....
.......... 10
430 Beaver Creek Metropolitan 72,325,870 35.079 2,537,12D
YOUR TAX MONEY SUPPORTS AND PROVIDES FOR , Bellyache Ridge Metro. 1,398,430 15.220 21,254
THE FOLLOWING SERVICES: Im ravements ...................:...
P ............. ........2,138,540
Berry creek Metropolitan
12,413,130
26.383
327,495
$Ch001S
TOTAL
...........
3
764
760 Bighorn Water 9,448,090 2.315 21,872
.
................. ............. ........
,
, Cascade Village Metro. 18,584,780 14.518 269,777
POIICe ~ Fire Pr0teC110n Cedar Hill Cemetery Assoc. 13,929,970 .905 12,607
County & City Road Construction & Maintenance NATURAL RESOURCES Colorado Rverconserv. 5s7,3sis3o .449 254,759
Water & Sewer Lines Eagle Cemetery 18,778,120 .643 12,074
Public Libraries Earth and Stone ..................... .....909..... .........118,540 Eagle Co.Emerg.Serv.Ho. 503,183,160 1.385 686,845
Severed Minerallnterests .............
.....388 .,...
.............110 Ea le-Vail Metro olitan
9 p 30,203,650 17237 520,820
Recreation & Parks
Improvements ......................
..............
..........23
220 Eagle Sanitation 11,162,270 1.308 14,600
Public Health Services & Welfare & Other Social , Edwards Metropolitan 7,543,570 18.512 139,647
$eNICeS Personal Property ................... .............. ..........90,920 Gore Valley Water 17,378,970 4.664 81,056
TOTAL Greater Eagle Fire Prot. 15,858,19D 4.558 72,284
Property Taxes DO NOT support any State Services. ............................. .............. .........232,790 GYPsum Fire 9,585,910 10.675 102,329
Gypsum sanitation 5,675,040 3.141 17,825
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT ROLL Lake Creek Meadows Water 2,532,420 13.939 35,296
Lions Ridge Water 13,659,430 4.027 55,007
Land ............................... ............. ......191,918,460 Mld-Valley Metropolitan 4,800,050 10.000 48,001
1989 taxes are due January 1
1990 Improvements ....................... .............. .....322,983,800 Mlnturn Cemetery Assoc. 313,844,500 .025 7,848
,
.
Personal Property ....................
..............
.......27,943,070 Redcliti Water & Sanlt. 811,910 12.669 10,286
First half of taxes become delinquent on March 1, 1990. U er Ea le Valle
pp g y Sanit.
266,981,830
2.161
576,948
S1ateAssessed ...................... .............. ......24,546,600 Upper E.V.Consolid.San. 467,601,130 .709 331,529
Second half of taxes become delinquent on August 1, 1990. vail intermountain Water 7,332,080 3.830 2a,oe2
NO interest is charged TOTAL TAXABLE PROPERTY .. ............. ......587,391,930 Vail Metropolitan Rec. 285,116,61D 1.530 436,227
if taxes are paid in full before May 1, 1990. Vail Valley Consol, Water 285,904,980 1.355 367,401
Exempt Properties ................... .............. ...... 93,434,860 Vail Village West Water 19,338,590 2284 44,189
Vail Water 218,747,820 0 0
TOTAL PROPERTY ................... ............. . ...660,826,790 Vall Water & Sanitation 200,619,300 .886 177,749
West Eagle Co. Ambl. 34,479,120 3.940 135,830
SUMMARY OF TAXES western Eagle County
This abstract is prepared for you by the Assessor's Of• Metropoltan Rec. oist. 4a,27s,37o a.15o 163,747
fice. Anyone interested may have a free copy by apply Real Property ........................ ............. .....$33,885,136
ing in person or by mail. We have a permanent mailing Personal Property .................... .............. .......1,742,269
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
list and if you would like a copy each year, notify us and Mobile Homes ....................... .............. ........154,643 REFiOJ 537,134,700 29.327 15,752,549
we will place your name on the list. Pobricutunies ....................... .............. .......1,512,337 RE-1J 29,735,950 47.330 1,407,402
1 JT 521,280 33.568 17,498
TOTALREVENUETOBECOLLECTEO ... .............. ......37,294,385 Colorado Mtn. Jr. College 567,391,930 4.913 2,787,597