The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-08-14 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session \_/i,~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 1:00 P.M. in the VAIL PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY ROOM AGENDA 1. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 2. Second Quarter Financial Report 3. Discussion of Proposed Amended Town-wide Leash Law Ordinance 4. Request to Construct a Canopy on Town of Vail Property in the Lionshead Mall (Applicant: Vail Resort Association) 5. Information Update 6. Other Please be sure to wear appropriate clothing and footwear for the tours. 7. Tour of the Vail Village Transportation Parking Structure 8. Tour of Forest Management Activities on Forest Service Roads VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 1:00 P.M. in the VAIL PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY ROOM EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 1. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Kristan Pritz 1:15 2. Second Quarter Financial Report Steve Barwick Action Requested of Council: Ask questions and make comments as desired. Background Rationale: Staff estimates of 1990 revenues and expenditures will be presented. 1:20 3. Discussion of Proposed Amended Town-wide Leash Law Ordinance Larry Eskwith Action Requested of Council: Give staff direction on whether to proceed with town-wide leash law ordinance. Background Rationale: Council directed staff to draft an ordinance for discussion purposes. 1:35 4. Request to Construct a Canopy on Town of Vail Property in Betsy Rosolack the Lionshead Mall (Applicant: Vail Resort Association) Action Requested of Council: Allow/deny request to proceed to DRB. Background Rationale: The Vail Resort Association is proposing a canvas canopy (roof only) as a temporary structure to be placed at the fountain area in the Lionshead Mall. The canopy would only be in place during special events. Staff Recommendation: Allow applicant to proceed to DRB. 1:45 5. Information Update Ron Phillips 1:50 6. Other Please be sure to wear appropriate clothing and footwear for the tours. 2:00 7. Tour of the Vail Village Transportation Parking Structure Stan Berryman 3:00 8. Tour of Forest Management Activities on Forest Service Roads Bill Ott PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION August 13, 1990 SITE VISITS - 11:30 A work session on Air Quality--Susan Scanlan - l:oo Site Visits - 2:00 Public Hearing 1. Approval of minutes from the July 23, 1990 meeting. - 2. A request for a setback variance in order to enlarge.,a second story housekeeping service room at Montaneros Condominiums located at 641 W. Lionshead Circle, Lot 8, Block 1, Vail-Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: Montaneros Condominium Association 2 3. A request for a conditional use permit, a landscape variance, and a setback variance for a remediation system equipment building at the Alpine Standard Station, part of Lot A, Vail Village 2nd Filing, 285 S. Frontage Road West. Applicant: Amoco Corp. 4 4. A request for a wall height variance and an amendment to the approved access plan for both lots at 146 and 126 Forest Road, Lots 5 and 6, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Ron Byrne 1 5. A request for a height variance at 2855 Snowberry Drive, Lot 6, Block 9, Vail Intermountain. Applicant: Doug and Michelle Cahill 3 6. A request for a conditional use to expand hospital space at the Vail Valley Medical Cuter on Lots E and F, Vail Village 2nd Filing (181 West Meadow Drive). Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center TABLED UNTIL 7. A request for an exterior alteratin on Lot C AUGUST 27TH and Lot D, and the southwesterly 4 feet of Lot B, all in Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing, 227 Bridge Street (Covered Bridge Building). Applicant: Hillis of Snowznass, Inc. and Bruce Amm & Associates. TABLED UNTIL 8. A request fora major amendment to SDD No. AUGUST 27TH 16, part of parcel A, Lior.~sridge Subdivision, Filing 2. (The Valley Pha~:e III) Applicant: Brad & Susan 4'jossem TABLED UNTIL 9. A request for a major subdivision, to approve AUGUST 27TH the preliminary plan, a rE:quest for a variance to the maximum height for retaining walls, and a request for zi variance to the maximum percent grade for a road, on a parcel commonly referred to as S~~raddle Creek, an approximate 40 acre parce]L located north and east of the Main Vail I-70 interchange and east of the Spraddle Creels livery. Applicant: George Gillett:, Jr. TABLED 10. A request for a major amendment to~SDD No. 4, INDEFINITELY Coldstream Condominiums i~z order to amend Sections 18.46.090 (B} density, 18.46.100 (B} floor area, 18.46.220 employee housing and 18.46.230 time requiremenits to convert an existing racquetball facility into an employee housing unit, management office, laundry and owner storage area atLot 53 Glen Lyon Subdivision, 1476 We,sthaven Drive. Applicant: Coldstream Co:ndominiuml' Association. WITHDRAWN 11. A request for a side setback varince at Lot 3, Block 5 Vail Village 1st Filing, Unit 3B-- Vail Rowhouses, 303 Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Stewart Colton ~I WITHDRAWN 12. A request for a variance to Section 18.58.020 (C) in order to construct a 5' high wood screen fence in the 20' front setback at 9 Vail Road--Holiday House, Lot B, Vail Village 2nd Filing. Applicant: Holiday House/Pinnacle Resorts I 4 `~cE )t j - r town o~ uail 75 south frontage road veil, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2116 MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Phillips ~ FROM: Steve Barwick .r~~l~-.~ DATE: August 6, 1990 RE: 1990 Second Quarter Financial Report Please find attached the 1990 Second Quarter Financial Report. The report differs very little from the report generated three months ago. The Town's General Fund balance is still expected to drop dramatically due to the cash purchase of the Berry Creek 5th filing parcel. As stated previously, I would strongly recommend the Town pursue methods to restore the General Fund balance to a much higher level within the next few months. The projected fund balance of the Town's Capital Projects Fund is looking somewhat stronger than previously estimated. Due to strong sales tax revenues and higher than expected interest earnings, this fund should have a fund balance of over $400,000 at year end. In general, the Town's financial condition remains sound. Our primary revenue sources are growing at a good, if unspectacular, rate and the Town`s expenditures remain on budget. SHB/ds R~ TOWN OF VAIL SECOND QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT ~i August 6, 1990 89FNDBAL Revised: 8`/'10/190 TOWN OF VAIL STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 1/1/90 - 12/31/90 SPECIAL CAPITAL REAL ESTATE PARKING HEAVY VAIL ; GENERAL PROJECTS TRANSFER ASSESSMENT EQUIPMENT MARKETING DEBT SERVICE ; FUND FUND * TAX FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND ; TOTAL ; Fund Balance 1/1/90 2,392,356 8,996,729 2,061,419 167,110 345,914 5,386 2,355,465 ; 16,324,379 ; 1 ~ Projected 1990 Revenue 11,613,300 8,312,966 1,728,400 270,000 1,329,000 660,605 3,984,904 ; 27,899,175 ; Pro3ected 1990 Expenditures 13,772,822 16,866,746 2,440,288 437,110 1,314,000 658,189 2,907,520 ! 38,396,675 ! ~ Gain/(Loss) (2,159,522) (8,553,780) ( 711,888) ( 167,110) 15,000 2,416 1,077,384 ~ (10,497,500) Pro3ected Fund Balance 12/31/90 232,834 442,949 1,349,531 0 360,914 7,802 3,432,849 5,826,879 ; * Includes Parking Structure Construction Fund. sALgsset Revised: 8i 8/90 10NN OF VAIL SALBS tAI BSIINATION WOflbSflBBi X Change X Change 1990 1990 frog frog NON?B 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 ; BODGE? ACiOAL Variance 1989 Budget - January 626,448 514,102 675,186 696,752 742,262 881,304 890,585 1,063,196 1,128,496 1,436,328 1,508,000 1,574,399 66,399 9.6X 4.4X February 624,040 594,292 687,792 751,856 824,650 918,154 946,552 1,135,786 1,205,101 1,532,394 1,535,000 1,668,882 133,882 8.9X 8.7X March 683,000 697,464 853,648 977,828 1,084,814 1,187,520 1,316,652 1,378,182 1,591,705 1,992,245 1,990,000 1,944,501 ( 45,499) ( 2.4X) ( 2.3X) April 246,820 308,436 355,300 319,546 481,204 531,668 430,877 425,961 550,205 549,660 5?5,000 822,392 47,392 13.2X B.ZX Nay 89,180 135,774 147,378 156,588 166,200 162,912 244,987 245,518 170,567 201,615 ; 210,000 223,284 13,284 10.7X 6.3X tv Jnne 176,044 245,204 241,326 257,744 262,696 280,828 361,627 331,581 329,039 407,623 ; 410,000 442,541 32,541 8.6X 7.9X - Subtotal 2,445,532 2,495,272 2,966,630 3,160,314 3,561,826 3,962,386 4,191,280 4,580,824 4,973,113 6,119,865 6,228,000 6,475,999 24T,999 5.8X 4.OX July 281,846 339,418 349,116 407,474 406,462 447,815 479,507 479,201 559,683 656,127 ; 675,000 Augnat 268,052 332,724 348,756 384,338 402,792 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 653,560 675,000 Septe~ber 176,090. 285,918 268,598 324,670 384,864 340,102 374,060 442,402 422,502 513,920 517,000 October 137,316 225,024 223,830 198,614 206,248 209,282 237,504 273,951 291,204 294,369 300,000 Noveiber 140,630 210,254 245,894 281,104 310,588 229,083 376,651 386,270 376,235 423,096 ; 430,000 rnw nrw .nn nnn nrn nnr nrr . ono non 1 n~[ ern 1 n1o t C[0 rtCll 1 1 C7[ nnn Dece~ber 590,241 8i0,76i 737,auo oaa,luu ~uo,lao aua,aaa t,tul,cou l,LtJ,U1L 1,7JJ,81V 1,VJY,JVV 1 L,VVY,YVV TOTAL 4,039,768 4,109,372 5,140,330 5,610,214 6,179,538 6,481,608 7,338,801 7,945,164 8,654,572 10,319,906 ; 10,460,000 6,475,999 247,999 L flBTT ` flevised: 2/ 3/1990 TOBH OF PAIL ABAL BSTATB TflAHSFBfl TAI History and Budget 1990 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1990 BODGBT flOHTfl ACT06L ACTOAL ecTDAL ACiOAL 6CTOAL ACTOAL ACiOAL AcTDAL ACT06L 6CTOAL BODGBt ACtOAL veeIAHCB January 63,999 98,089 106,981 119,992 18,053 80,733 101,374 131,916 96,119 309,233 ; 98,966 162,954 63,988 February 40,595 69,018 105,024 132,220 86,289 170,052 64,906 44,040 109,873 140,192 ; 91,460 133,085 41,625 flarcb 69,886 126,935 109,533 139,820 62,693 63,831 92,557 38,791 68,104 145,957 ; 89,002 77,995 ( 11,007) April 76,855 94,653 65,900 103,526 173,321 90,396 182,743 95,554 179,691 151,069 ; 117,440 152,027 34,589 flay 42,738 84,324 54,663 90,599 96,006 228,873 98,651 120,984 99,736 220,299; 105,291 169,796 62,499 w June 62,239 125,433 54,488- 140,638 76,467 49,513 79,915 73,509 101,364 122,466 ; 84,684 135,418 50,794 July 49,367 188,110 104,262 68,539 151,598 88,528 70,441 47,949 126,537 125,675 ; 96,253 75,139 ( 21,114) . Subtotal 405,619 784,562 600,851 793,314 730,427 711,726 690,587 552,743 781,404 1,214,891 ; 683,103 904,474 221,391 Angnst 79,859 115,499 71,282 97,806 58,937 32,860 100,182 61,131 109,315 88,347 ; 80,910 Septeibr 59,800 113,992 49,332 96,746 64,671 48,516 108,187 78,819 116,557 143,306 ; 83,736 October 108,510 154,000 42,498 122,546 88,732 109,633 93,860 124,291 177,360 241,393 ; 119,130 flove~ber 102,623 107,768 81,898 91,385 105,109 74,909 89,047 114,839. 241,888 165,964 ; 104,468 Deceiber 142,662 133,869 110,911 58,533 81,890 333,139 106,695 95,495 192,947 192,737 ; 128,655 TOTAL 899,133 1, 409, 688 956, 572 1, 258, 330 1,129, 966 1, 370, 783 1,188, 538 1, 027, 324 1, 619, 471 2, 044, 638 ; 1, 200, 000 904, 474 221, 371 10-Aug-90 Financial Report :::.P ~td:::::::::.:::.::.::.::.:::.:.:::.::.:<.::.:::.::::.:::.::.:~::.::.::.:::.;:::;:. 1990 1990 VARIANCE G~NEpAL BUND REVENUE BUDGET; ESTiMAI E OVER/(UNDER) Taxes Property & Ownership Taxes 1,874,600 1,883,600 9,000. Retail Sales Tax 5,322,000 5,511,~D00 189,000 Ski Lift Tax 788,000 830,~D00 42,000 > Franchise Fees 426,000 425,!D00 _ ! (1,000) , . Penalty 8~ Interest 35,000 36,000 _ . T;000 Subtotal Taxes 8,445,600 8,685,600 24 0.0 0 0.:: Construction Fees 170,000 285,000 s;;:;;?. _;::;115;000, Licenses 8 Permits 28,900 44,'700 ; :75;800 Charges for Services 262,236 204,000 (58,236); Transportation Centers 1,201,960 1,111,000 (90,960) Intergovernmental Revenue 757,900 797,000: ' 39,1'00'` Fines 8~ Forteitures 189,200 210,000 _ 20,800.::: Other 389,435 276,000 (113,435) TOTAL GF REVENUE 17`;445;231 11;,613;300::. ,~f~$,069> 1990 1990 ! VARIANCE GENERAL FUND :EXPENDITURES BUDGET ESTIMA7 E OVER/(UNDER) Town Officials 2,493,977 2,483,;500 ?;;;;;;:::;:::::(10;477): Administrative Services 1,073,765 1,094,1)00 20;235 Community Development 671,642 658,1)00 ::...........,.::..113,642): Police 2,227,759 2,203,000 ; {14;759) Fire 879,696 879,696 ; . ':::0 Public Works 1,759,293 1,796,000 3ti70Z°; Transit 1,540,714 1,510,1)00 ;;;<;<{30;714); Transportation Centers 829,862 844,000 ; ;;:::::;:;:;:;';::?:::::14';138 Library 512,733 512,733 ' ;I:';<' 0' Contributions & Events 760,867 755,000 ' ' 5;86.. Employee Benefits 115,750 115,000 ;,,.;;:<;;<«>' >';;<`;(750) Insurance 390,300 380,000 >:;110'300) Contingency 100 O s::::::::':;:.<{00)' VMRD Recreation Contract 541,893 516,!393 <'''(25000) Eagle Valley Child Care Study 25,000 25,000 ;:;0 TOTAL'GF EXPENDITURES ;1:3;823,351 .;.......13;772,1322' : .15Q,5~1~~ ..............~~1 ~.h)~?t~aa~ ~ ~t.~0 ~ X59 ,~22:.;::::>::>::»::::>::::;:>::211:~~~~~:: 4 10-Aug-90 Financial Report 's ' 1990 1990 VARIANCE : CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUE BUDGET E..STIMATE .....OVER/jUNDER) Retail Sales Tax 5,183,000 5,359,000 >;,;'176040' County Sales Tax 173,000 188,000 <;,15000. Ski Lift Tax 788,000 830,000 42,000;; Recreation Amenities Fees 20,000 125,000 >10b,~000 Earnings on Investments 90,000 200,000 ;:;;:;:::::';;:.`.;;1;10;000'`: Other Income 75,200 184,600 ;;::::<::;<:;1:09,400':. RETT Loan Repayment 509,156 509,156 : 0::; AT&T Lawsuit Funds 0 128,100 ......,...,128,100::. WI Lease Revenue 0 20,000 <;;>; ::::;':;20;000.. W. Gore Cr. Dr. Bridge Grant 160,000 160,000 `'>!'?''0;: Parking Construction Fund Int. 0 442,000 ?:,<42~00:' Transfer from SPAF 0 167,110 . ;,;:;1:67;1.10 TOTAL REVENUE:..:....... 6;998;356. 8,312,966 ~.x3'l~,F~f~::; 1990 ; 199Q VARIANCE . CAPITAL.. PROJECTS FUND EXP: BUDGET >s E. STIMATE ; QVER/(UNDER) Project Rollforwards from 1989 621,000 621,000 ' 0 Handicap Access Van 36,600 37,000: 400 W. Gore Creek Dr. Bridge 182,500 182,500 ' > 0 Post Office Remodel/VRA Move 35,000 35,000 0.: Fire Truck Purchase 350,000 350,000 _ <:0 Bus Replacement 481,000 481,000 0 Forest Serv Joint Visitor Center 15,000 15,000 '0 Street Maintenance ~ Improvements 1,345,000 1,345,000 : < D New Snow Dump Site 25,000 32,000 ...........:.:...7;000: Street Light Improvement 30,000 30,000 ';>;>>':"0 Esc. Bldg. Maintenance 70,000 70,000 :0; . Recreational Paths Maintenance 52,000 52,000 _,;;0. Parking Structures Projects 30,000 30,000 ' 0 ; TOV Shop Maint. & Improvements 110,000 110,000 0 Library Children's Area Remodel 29,000 29,000 0:` Bus Interior Refurbishment 26,000 26,000: _ '0 Municipal Bldg Remodel/Study 49,000 49,000 '0 Fire Dept Furniture ~ Carpet 25,000 25,000 . ` 0 Bus Shelter Improvements 30,000 30,000. 0. W. Meadow Dr. Conceptual Design 27,000 27,000 ;0., People Mover Study/Grant Applic. 13,000 13,000 _ : _ 0 Dobson Arena Flooring 15,000 15,000 , :>;!;:>;>!';p; Willow Bridge Replacement 50,000 50,000 ?0;' Holy Cross Purchase 10 000 10 000 <:>`>`<`><>'<`<'`' , 0: Parking Structure Construction 9 787 842 9 787 842 , 0. Transfer to Debt Service 3,414,404 3,414,404 `'p ::::.`:::TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. ; 16859;346 y6,1366746... 7,~4. .............................................l... H~3RTF1~i.~.#.._::::::::.::::::.,:::.~;:;::.;~9,66a,99~~«:::<:::::::::><~8,~5~,'r8. ;;::::::~<::~.:,3Q~,.~`~..t:#}::~ 5 10-Aug-90 Financial Report 1990::. 1990 VARIANCE LOTTERY FUND ....:..:.BUDGET:;..: ;ESTIMATE,.:.4VER7(UNDER) REVENUE 7,000 8,;100 `><<!<<" 500; EXPENDITURES 7,000 8,:100 .1._,500,.' 1990 r 1990 1ARIANCE _ REAL ESTATE TRANS TAX FUND: BUDGET:; ;;ESTIMATE OVER/(UNDER) REVENUE Rt i i Taxes 1,200,000 1,500,000 ' 300,000.` Golf Course LeaseNMRD 73,400 73,~>•00 . 0 Earnings on Investments 100,000 155,000 ' . . 55;000::': TOTAL Rr ~ REVENUE y;;373;400 1,728,~Z,00 355,000 EXPENDITURES Purchase of O en S ace 340,932 340 932 _>;<<'<>>' :':0:; P P . Transfer to Debt Service Fund 200,000 200,000 '<0' Loan Repayment 509,656 509,fi56 < ` 0 Open Space Projects 1,358,700 1,389,700 31.,000.:: 31,p TOTAL:Rt ~ i.EXPEN.DITUR.ES ; . .......::2,409,288.::. 2,440,:88 _ 00 ::>':>~:::~UF4PLf~Sf 3C-1.~FfTiF . ;:::>::::>::::>::::::>_:::::<:::::>:::>:::<:>::> ...........................~.1~35 888:«::>:<:::<::: >#:Il:>I388 :<:::>:>:>:><::::3 : 1.990 . ' 1990 VARIANCE HEAVY;EQUIP,MENT:FUND,; ,BUDGET . .::;ESTIMATE _ OVER7(UNDER) REVENUE 1,419,600 1,329,A00 ;;;{50~Q0) EXPENDITURES 1,452,529 1,314,000 ; {1 38;529): ::::»~:S~f~PLISI~~HL3~TFAi~~~~>`:>><':<<<>«>s`32'9~'9:'>»>~><>~<>1~'~ t)00>'>~>~>~>~>''<~'~~~929 I 6 10-Aug-90 Financial Report a 1.;990 > ..;;::1:990.;::.:::::::>:;::: VARIANCE ::.SPEC PARKING ASSESSMENTFUND BUDGET:;...,.... E$TI.MATE.:.. O,V. ERI(UNDER) REVENUE 35 000 >><'>,;;`''''``'``<> P rki a n Assessm n e is 35 000 9 ~ . 0.. Daily Parking Revenue 235,000 225,000 ;('IO;000j Earnings on Investments 5,000 10,000 ! ;'!:x::;:::;;:;::;::;;:;:;5;000 TOTAL:SPAF REVEN _ . ..:<::::<<<:::;'::::;;;;::>;::;;:<;::<;<::':::::::275 000..:.:::::;::,::,:,:.:.:270 000.:::;>.;:.>:.>: 5 0 EXPENDITURES Transfer to Debt Service 275,000 270 000 <<:<< 5'000 Trans to Capital Projects Fund 167,110 167,110 <<>> __<>'><:'0 T:OTAL;SPAFEXPENDITtJRES ; , , 442,1:10 437;110..; ;:(5;000). ..........................................l..:t~~3R~~A).,)..1:,,::....~:.~:::.:::::::......::::::::{1:~'~lr~.:(.~~:.;:.>:.;:.;:.::.::.,~..{'I.fTx~.~.~D~,;;::::.~:::.;:.;:.;;:.;:<.:;.:~;:;;:.;;:.;D:::; 1990 ::;1.990:::::;`>>:. VARIANCE.:: MARKETING FUND ESTIMATE ;OVER!(tJNDERj BUDGET.:: REVENUE Business Licenses 325,000 325,000 ?<<'>:'::0 . . TOV Marketing Contribution 160,500 160,500 <>>>>`>0: Other Marketing Contributions 116,000 140,000 24;000:` Miscellaneous 1,000 17,105::;;;;:; ; .;<:;;;16,105 . Earnings on Investments 12,000 18,000 ,>:;;:;;.;,;6,000 TOTAL MARKETING REVENUE 614,500 660.,605 ' 46,105`; EXPENDITURES ':'651;1759 658,189:.: 7,130' }..:.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::.>:<:.;:.;:I3E...~;~a~):<:.;:.;:;.;:<:<.;::::<:::: ;:.21..4.. ~.~~;:;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.::;:.;:.;:.::;;~6:9fiS;:: 7 MNTHRPT Re~~ised: 8/ 5/90 TOWN OF VAIL FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE REVENUE SUt4MARY As of June 30, 1990 ; (Operating.Funds Only) 1989 '1990 1989 JUN YTD % 1:90 JUN YTD % OVER FUND JUN YTD OF TOTAL JUt1 YTD OF BUDGET (UNDER) GENERAL FUND Sales Tax 3,347,697 58.7% 3,306,191 62.1% 3.5% Property Taxes 1,329,476 73.1% 1,3;16,780 72.4% ( .8%) Ski Lift Tax 580,451 76.0% 6~E2,671 ~ 81.6% 5.5°6 Trans. Centers 813,652 67.9% 7~l0,356 61.6% ( 6.3%) Charges for Services 101,684 40.7% 1'6,155 29.0% ( 11.7%) Other 882,779 37.0% 1,1:3,254 55.6% 18.6% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,055,739 58.2% 7,24E5,40? 63.2% 5.0% i CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Sales Tax 2,797,941 59.2°6 3,2(18,901 61.9% 2.7% Ski Lift Tax 580,451 76.0% 662,671 j 81.6% 5.5% Other 167,617 12.1% 2f?4,576 ' 58.6% 46.4% Trans from C)ther Funds 0 .0% 0 ~ .0% .0% CAPITAL PROJECTS TOTAL 3,546,009 39.3% 4,1:6,148 64.0% 24.7% I i LOTTERY TOTAL 0 .0% 4,625 166.1% 66.1% GRAND TOTAL 10,601,748 50.1% 11,3~~6,180 63.5% 13.4% i 8 MNTHRPT Revised: 8/ 5/90 TOWN OF VAIL FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE EXPENDITURE SUMMARY As of June 30, 1990 (Operating Funds Only) 1989 1990 1989 JUN YTD % 1990 JUN YTD % OVER FUND JUN YTD OF TOTAL JUN YTD OF BUDGET (UNDER} GENERAL FUND Town Officials 260,543 48.0% 2,183,446 86.7% 38.6% Administrative Serv. 447,597 48.2% 563,844 52.5% 4.3% Community Development 243,470 47.8% 281,694 42.6% ( 5.2%) Police - 938,673 50.1% 1,010,653 45.4% ( 4.8%) Fire 405,411 47.9% 438,529 49.9% 2.0% Public Works 773,121 48.0% 925,105 52.6% 4.6% Transit 715,034 52.3% 743,905 48.3% ( 4.0%) Transportation Centers 392,539 49.3% 388,948 46.9% ( 2.4%) Library 204,915 45.5% 236,681 46.2% .7% Contrib. & Events 469,980 75.3% .612,706 80.5% 5.2% Employee Benefits 21,631 48.1% 47,744 41.2% ( 6.8%) Insurance 141,457 36.5% 437,595 112.1% 75.6% Contingency 0 .0% 0 .0% .0% Trans. to Other Funds 200,000 11.0% 0 .0% ( 11.0%) VMRD Contract 204,395 37.4% 268,615 49.6% 12.1% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 5,418,766 43.9% 8,139,465 58.9% 15.0% CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Projects 1,090,897 31.4% 477,175 3.5% ( 27.9%) Transfers 872,028 31.2% U .0% ( 31.2%) CAPITAL PROJECTS TC)TAL 1,962,925 31.3% 477,175 2.8% ( 28.5%) LOTTERY TOTAL 0 .0% 0 .0% .0% GRAND TOTAL 7,381,691 39.6% 8,616,640 28.1% ( 11.6%) 9 ORDINANCE N0. Series of 1990 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6.04.190 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TO PROVIDE THAT DOGS, WHEN OFF THE PROPERTY OF THEIR OWNERS OR KEEPER, THEY MUST BE ON A LEASH; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, dogs running at large have become an increasingly serious problem within the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town Council believes that it will protect the safety and property of the inhabitants of the Town to require that dogs off the property of their owners throughout the Town of Vail must be on a leash. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: 1. Section 6.04.190 Running at Large of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: A. It is unlawful for the owner or keeper of a dog to permit his dog to run at large on any bikepath or public park located within the Town or on any area located within the Town. B. A dog shall be deemed running at large when it is off or away from the property or premises of its owner or keeper and is not on a leash of not more than seven (7) feet in length that is held by a responsible person. Z. Section 6.04.200 Running at Large - Elsewhere of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety. 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this day of , 1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 8/10/90 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS Page 1 of 2 8/8/89 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION ARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for A new advocate for petition circulation is being sought, (request: Lapin) annexation. Cindy Callicrate to be contacted. 2/27 SATELLITE POST OFFICE (request: ON: Pursue station "in town" and/or increase Meeting to be set up with Ernie Chavez. Summer bus service Osterfoss) summer bus service? increased. 5/1 AMEND CODE, 12.04.240, STREET CUT TAN/LARRY/KRISTAN: Per Council direction, proceed. Pam has given original ordinances to Stan. Recommended PERMITS changes to be presented to Council in September. 6/12 VAIL GLO SIGN (request: Levine) ON/KRISTAN: Through DRB, or some other process, Kristan will handle. can the lettering color and lighting be modified? 6/19 STOLPORT ON: Contact Jet-Link, Inc., Neal Meehan, on the Kent and Ron are scheduling meeting w/Bill James and Allan Allen Expressway, Houston, TX, to further pursue Nottingham. possible subsidy and resurfacing proposal. 6/26 ABANDONED VEHICLES EN: Contact County to see if a county-wide P.D. is analyzing along with County. Will report to (request: Steinberg) crushing of same could be organized, resulting Council in August. in lesser costs of demolition and ridding our- selves of the problem. 6/26 AIR QUALITY USAN: Issue of passive smoke and smoking in Susan has been given assignment. restaurants needs to be revisited by this fall. 6/26 TED KINDEL MEMORIAL ODD 0.: Track. down ownership of land to the south Land is all owned by VA. VA says a plaque can be placed (request: Rose) of the Christiania. If this belongs to the TOV, there. A letter from VA is forthcoming. Stan will begin to formulate memorial plan, i.e., park contact Gordon Britton, who will have a plaque made up. bench, plaque, etc.? 7/17 BIKES/ROLLER BLADES AND SKATES/ EN/LARRY: Should bicycles, roller blades, etc. be Researching appropriate ordinances. SKATEBOARDS prohibited from highly pedestrianized areas in the Village and Lionshead? 1/17 BUSINESS LICENSE SURVEY RESULTS ALLY LORTON/LARRY: Council is interested in seeing Will be presented to Council in August. survey results as related to the proposed short- term rental amendment to the business license ordinance. 7/24 AG/OPEN SPACE AMENDING ORDINANCE ARRY/KRISTAN: Unanimous consensus of Council to Ordinance being developed. proceed to make AG/Open Space 35 acre minimum per unit. WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 8/10/90 Page 2 of 2 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS _ 8/7 VESTED RIGHTS (request: LARRY/KRISTAN: When does a person vest rights for Larry will develop. Fritzlen) development purposes? 7/27 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES IN LARRY/STAN: Work with Holy Cross Electric to Scheduled to begin this fall. EAS-T- VAd-L ~stabli-sh-specialimpr-ovement-distr-i-ct(s) far undergrounding utilities in East Vail. 7/27 HOTEL/CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS KRISTAN/LARRY: Develop list of hotels with Will provide by August 28. condominium approvals. 8/7 COUNTY-WIDE BUS MEMORANDUM STEVE B.: Send memo to County Commissioners prior Ron had memo and cover letter sent out August 9. to 8/14 meeting at Public Works. 8/7 JOHNSON/GATES DEBATE RON: Schedule discussion w/Bud Gates and Linda Will do. Johnson prior to November general election. ~ . II ZONING existing,grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive), at any given point to the top of a flat roof, or mansard roof or to the highest ridge line of a sloping roof. (Ord. 37(1980) § 1 (part).) 18.04.180 Home occupation. "Home occupation" means a use conducted entirely within a dwelling which is incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling for dwelling purposes and which does not change the residential character thereof. (Ord. 8(1973) § 1.600 (part).) 18.04.190 Kitchen facilities. "Kitchen facilities" means fixtures and equipment for food storage and preparation of meals, including a sink, stove, and refrigeration and food storage facilities. (Ord. 8(1973) § 1.600 (P~)•) 18.04.200 Landscapin ` l; "Landscaping" means planted areas and plant materials, including trees, shrubs, lawns, flower beds and ground cover, together with the core development such as walks, decks, patios, terraces, water features, and like features not occupying more than twenty percent of the landscaped area. For the purposes of this title, natural or significant rock outcroppings, trees or native vegetation shall be deemed landscaping in a single family, two-family residential, residential cluster, low density multi-family, Hillside Residential, and primary/secondary residential zone districts. (Ord. 36(] 987) § 1: Ord. 19(1976) § 2 (part): Ord. 8(1973) 1.600 (part).) 18.04.210 Lodge. "Lodge" means a building or group of associated buildings designed for occupancy primarily as the temporary lodging place of individuals or families either in accommodation units 308 cvd~i iz-i-s>> y w C ~ DESIGN REVIEW . Chapter 18.54 DESIGN REVIEW Sections: 18.54.010 Intent. 18.54.015 Definitions and rules of construction. 18.54.020 Board organization. 18.54.030 Design approval. 18.54.040 Material to be submitted/procedures. . 18.54.050 Design guidelines. _ ~ 18.54.051 Park design guidelines. 18.54.060 Design review fee. 18.54.070 Performance bond. 18.54.080 Administrative policies. 18.54.090 Appeal to town council. 18.54.100 Enforcement. 18.54.110 Lapse of design review approval. 18.54.010 Intent. Vail is a town with a unique natural setting, internationally known for its natural beauty, alpine environment, and the compatibility of man-made structures with the environment. These characteristics have caused a significant number of visitors to come to Vail with many visitors eventually becoming perma- nent residents participating in community life. These factors constitute an important economic base for the town, both for those who earn their living here and for those who view the town as a precious physical possession. The town council finds that new development and redevelopment can have a substantial impact on the character of an area in which it is located. Some harmful effects of one land use upon another can be prevented through zoning, subdivision controls, and building codes. Other aspects of development are more subtle and less amenable to exact rules put into operation without regard to specific development proposals. Among these are the general form of the land before and after development, the spatial 445 (Vail 12-23-86) a ZONING relationships of structures and open spaces to land uses within the vicin''"fty and the town, and the appearance of buildings and open spaces as they contribute to the area as it is being developed and redeveloped. In order to provide for the timely exercise of judgment in the public interest in the evaluation of the design of new development and redevelopment, the town council has created a design review board (DRB) and design criteria. Therefore, in order to preserve the natural beauty of the town and its setting, to protect the welfare of the community, to maintain the values created in the community, to protect and enhance land and property, for the promotion of health, safety, and general welfare in the community, and to attain the objectives set out in this section; the improvement or alteration of open space, exterior design of all new development, and all modifi- cations to existing development shall be subject to design review as specified in this chapter. It is the intent of these guidelines to leave as much design freedom as possible to the individual designer while at the same time maintaining the remarkable natural beauty of the area by creating structures which are designed to complement both their individual sites and surroundings. The objectives of design review shall be as follows: A. To recognize the interdependence of the public welfare and aesthetics, and to provide a method by which this inter- dependence may continue to benefit its citizens and visitors; B. To allow for the development of public and private property which is in harmony with the desired character of the town as defined by the guidelines herein provided; C. To prevent the unnecessary destruction or blighting of the natural landscape; D. To ensure that the architectural design, location, configura- tion materials, colors, and overall treatment of built-up and open spaces have been designed so that they relate harmo- niously to the natural landforms and native vegetation, the town's overall appearance, with surrounding development and with officially approved plans or guidelines, if any, for the areas in which the structures are proposed to be located. E. To protect neighboring property owners and users by making sure that reasonable provision has been made for such ~v;,u iz-z3_a~,> 446 DESIGN REVIEW "matters as pedestrian and vehicular traffic, surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, the preservation of light and air, and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. (Ord. 39 (1983) § 1.) . ~ \ DESIGN REVIEW e. The applicant or his authorized representative shall +s be present at the design review board meeting. 3. Staff approval. The zoning administrator may approve any of the following applications: a. Any application to an existing building that does not significantly change the existing planes of the building and is generally consistent with the architectural design, materials and colors of the building, including, but not limited to windows, skylights, siding, and other similar modifications; b. An application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent with the architectural design, mate- rials and colors of the building, and approval has been received by an authorized member of a condominium association, if applicable. c. An application to remove or modify the existing vegetation or landscaping upon a site. In the above-specified cases, the zoning admin- istrator may review and approve the application, approve the application with certain modifications, or may refer any application to the design review ,board for decision. All other applications shall be referred to the design review board. (Ord. 12(1988) § 1: Ord. 39(1983) § 1.) 18.54.050 Design guidelines. Actions of the design review board shall be guided by the objectives prescribed in Section 18.54.010, the Vail Village and Vail Lionshead Urban Design Considerations and Guide Plans, by all of the applicable ordinances of the Town of Vail, and by the following design guidelines: A. General. 1. Structures shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with Vail's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with the guidelines herein contained. 454c (Vail 8-2-88) J . ZONING ~ . 2. ~A~y building site in Vail is likely to have its own unique land forms and features. Whenever possible, these exist- ing features should be preserved and reinforced by new construction. The objective is to fit the buildings to their sites in a way that leaves the natural land forms and features intact, treating the buildings as an integral part of the site, rather than as isolated objects at odds with their surroundings. B. Site planning. 1. The location and configuration of structures and access ways shall be responsive to the existing topography of the site upon which they are to be located. Grading require- ments resulting from development shall be designed to blend into the existing or natural landscape. Any cuts or fills shall be sculptural in form and contoured to blend with the existing natural undisturbed terrain within the property boundary. 2. Building siting and access thereto shall be responsive to existing features of terrain rock outcroppings, drainage patterns, and vegetation. 3. Removal of trees, shrubs, and other native vegetation shall be limited to removal of those essential for develop- ment of the site or those identified as diseased. 4. All areas disturbed during construction shall be re- vegetated. Ifnecessary, the DRB may designate allowable limits of construction activity and require physical bar- riers in order to preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a site and adjacent sites during con- struction. S. All projects shall be designed so as to provide adequate snow storage areas for snow cleared from the parking areas and roadways within the project. . C. Building materials and design. 1. Building materials shall be predominantly natural such as wood siding, wood shakes, and native stone. Brick is acceptable. Where stucco is utilized, gross textures and surface features that appear to imitate other materials shall be avoided. Concrete surfaces shall be treated with texture and color if used, however exposed aggregate is more acceptable than raw concrete. Neither aluminum 454d (Vail 8-2-88) _ , / i DESIG\ RE~'IE~b' ~ - steel, or plastic siding, nor simulated stone or brie: shall be permitted. Plywood sidine shall not be oermitt~~. 2. The same orsimilar building materials and colors ~::atl'he used on main structures and any accesson• strutsnres upon the site. 3. Exterior wall colors should be compatible «~ith the site and surrounding buiidin~s. \aturai colors rearth tones found ~~•ithin the Vail areal should be utiiiz~d. Pry^arv colors or other brunt colors shoutd be usea ~nty as accents and then soacin~iy such as upon trim ur ra;un~s. All exterior wall matertais must be cuntinuea do«•n to finished Rrade thereby eiiminatin~= unfinisred tounaation ~ wails. ill exposed metal tlasiiin" trim, flues. and roof too = mechanical equipment shah oe unnuuized, paint.a or capable of weathenna so as to b~ non-r:aiecti~ e. 4. The majority of root forms «•i[i~in 'Fail are ;able roofs with a pitch of at !east tour feet in t~reh~e feet. rio~.~eyer, other root forms are allo~ced. Consideration ut en~;ron- mentaland climatic determinants such as sno~y shedding, drainage, and solar exposure should be integral to the roof design. 5. Roof lines should be desiened so as nut to deposit snow on parkin.: areas, trash storage areas. stain~~ays, dcclts and baronies, or entry~~•ays. Secondary roof;, snu« ~ lips, and snow guards should be utilized to protect these areas from root snow sheddine_ if necessary. 6. hoof surfacing materials shall he compatible «•ith the Site and surrounding buildings. The predominant roof mate- rials utilized are wood shakes and their use is strrn~~ly encouraged. The use of metal roofs is acceptable, hm~~eyer in no instance will metal m~l:~ «•hich reflect direct sunli~sht ~~nto an ad}accnt property hr permitted. It metal roofs are used they shall he surfaced with :t loin-,-loss finish or capahlc: of «eatherinf; to a dull finish. ~1eta! rcm(s shall ~_encrtlly hays a st:utdine seam in order to hru~,~ide surge relict to the roof surface anti he of a heavy ~au:.~e. :~~hhalt and fihcr~~Ltss shin~~lcs .mall nrt he ' ~~•rntitted, ht~~~~cver, thrv sh;rll he ~~t sufficient ~zauLe, drsien, and cule~r to hr rumnatihle t~ith these ~ui~i,lincs. I.uIlrCic:nt ~~au~_c shall he ~4f(1 hds su it ut ruuhnt! ntatcrial). 1j.~,: s•.:.. ZO~I\G "f. -Rooftop heating and air conditioning equipment. large vent stacks, elevator penthouses and simiiar features should be avoided, however, if necessary, shall be de- signed to be compatible with the overall design of the structure or screened from view. Rooftop antennae shall not be permitted unless as allowed under a conditional use review as specifed within the zoning code. Solar collectors shall lie flat on pitched roofs, ho~ve~~~r. when retrofitting an existing buiiaing with active sour the collectors should be designed and placed in a manner compatible with the o~~erall design of the building. 9. Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and other buiidut~~ features that provide shelter from the elements are encouraged. 10. Fenestration should be suitable for the climate and for the orientation of the particular building elevation in ~ti~htch the fenestration occurs. The use of both passive and acr,~: e solar energy systems is strongly encouraged. 11. Exterior lighting shall be designed and located in a manner to minimize impact of li~Pubine upon li~~ing ar~:ts within a proposed project and upon adjacent structures and properties. 12. In no instance shalt a duplex structurz be so ~~~rtstruct:d as to result in each half of the structure appearing substantially similar or mirror image in design. l3`,. Duplex and primary; secondar~~ residential d«~ellin` units - ~liall be designed in a manner thaty.~~ns t'te two d«~elling units and gara~~es within-tine single ~tructt:re. \ However, in the event that the fi~esence of sign;iicant site ~ ~ characteristics necessitat~.i sSite design which utrlud.s :t • ~ ph}•sical separatiun gl~'thc two dweilin~~ unit: and or. / ~ ~_araccs into sepac~rte stru~[ures, the Ultl3 mas :tppr~~~~e ppp'~,,,;i the design. Sut;.lr desi.fn may b~ appru~ ed onl~• ~~•hen the ~ separate styrtctures are ~~i~uall~• attached h~• mr:tns nl the use of si~rtiiar and rumpatrhle ;zrrhitecnrral desi~_n, rolurs, and~trrials and, or ph~~sicall~~ cculn~cted ~~uh tcnc~,, gill;, decks ur other simiiar arrhitecni`r:tl. C~atuc~.. • IJ. I.andsrapine draina~:c; rroawn control. I. ~•anuus natural vel;et:ttion zones ext~t ~~~ithin cite e~,~rc V:tliry as a result of the: term and aypcrts ~~t tiir ~.u;d itxi?. s - . DESIG~+ REVIE`V ~r The north facing slopes within the valley are typically heavily wooded with spruce. pine and aspen and generally receive less direct sunii~Tht than the drier south facing slopes which typically consist of sage. aspen and other vegetation tolerant of drier conditions. The valley floor which is adjacent to Gore Creek consists of wide variety of trees and shrubs adapted to the reiative'ty_ fertile soi? and natural availability of \\~ater. The goal of any landscape plan should be to preserve and enhance the naturai lanciscane character of the area in --\v.hich it is to be located. The lanascape scale and overall landscape-design 5iiali be developed so that new yegeta- lion is integral with the naturai landscape and the inherent form line, color and texture of the local plant communities. Since the ma;or obiectiye of the iand- scaping is to help reduce the scale of new structures and to assist in the screening of structures, the piantirg of large sized plant materials is encouraged. Special care should be taken in selecting the types of plants to use when desiening a landscape plan. Final selection should be based upon the soils and climate, ease of establishment, suitability for the specific use desired, and the level of maintenance that can be proyidcd. \'ew planting shall use plants that are indigenous to the Rocky Mountain alpine and sub-alpine zones ur as capable uC being introduced into these zones. • A list of plant materials indigenous to the Vail area is nn file with the department cIf comrnunity development. also indicated on the list :Ire ornamentals which are suitable for planting within the ~',Iif area. The minimum sizes of landscape materials acceptable are as follows: Requirc~cl trees. Occiduous -two inch caliper Conifers -six foot Rc~c/rrirect sl?nth.r - 'i ~~allun runtainer F~nurclatinn shrubs >hall II:IVC :I nunumun hci~,ht ~rl ciLhtcen inches at time of plantinL. • landscape design shall he Iicvriuprd to locate new r,. - pl:uitini; in order to cxt::net exititin~z canui~~' edees ur -1 ~-l ti ~:=n i . I • a ZONING planted in natural looking groups. Geometric plantings, evenly spaced rows of trees, and other formal landscape patterns shall be avoided. 3. Particular attention shall be given the landscape design of off-street parking lots to reduce adverse impacts upon living areas within the proposed development, upon adjacent properties, and upon public spaces with regard to noise, li~,hts, and visual impact. Parking lots of fifteen or more spaces si~all comply with the landscape reauire- menu found in Section 1~.~2.030(F.) of the Vail viunici- pal Code. ~ 4. All landscaping shall be pru~: ided ith a method of irrigation suitable to ensure the continued maintenance of f 1 planted materials. ~ 5. 1~Vhenever possible natural drainage patterns upon the site shall not be modified. `~e~_ative drainage impacts upon adjacent sites shall not b~ allo«~d. 6. Runoff from impervious surfaces tiuc'tt as roofs and pavement areas shall be directed to natural or improved drainage channels or dispersed into shallow sloping vegetated areas. 7. Slope of cut and fill banks snail be det:rmined by ~uii characteristics fur the specific site to avoid erasion. and promote reve,etation opportunities. but in am' case sizall be limited to a maximum of 2:l slope. 8. Measures shall be taken to retain all eroded s~~i! material on site during construction, control bath .:round water and surface water runoff. and to permanently aabilire all disturbed slopes and dr;tina`c fcanlres anon cumpktiun of construction. 9. All plants shall be planted in a ~~oud auaiity tai~,ail mis of a type and amount recumnnn(led by the :\merican Landscape Contractor .\s,ucl:uu)n and the C~)1(~rado Nurseryman's AtiSUCI1[l~~[l. l0. ~'\Il plantin!,s must he nnil(:h.d. ! 1. Paving near a tree to br ~:ncd n)u.t ~antain :r Dian fur :t "tree ~auit" in order to";n,urr t!l~ ahil;ty ul the nuts to _ rcreive air. L-. Fencing. walls. 1. The placement ai ~.v,tli.:ln~i trn~•:, •.n.lil cr•t,rrt r~i>unL land forms and lit int(~ 1:1n(1 n);l„ut+~ r:ultcr than arhi- rva~t ti-is-xt) .t;.lh . y I" R. 3l I"1RS. SYRON RCSE ~cQ' 2895 Booth Creek Crive RECD AUG - ? 1990 Vail, Cclarsda 81857 r;ugust 1 ~ 98 M „ ~ ~wr 1/wv.i Plwnw i ICyul I1CIil I~u~a TG`rYii of IJ 3i 1 75 S. rl cn tCgB !Gaud `Jail, Colorado 81557 11nnr I/wY,i bitcui 1\C114, `t~2 ar a Y~riti ng this tG 2:;prass C,'sir.~QnC2r ~ about the proposed Caulking residence at mat ~"r, 1 1th ~liilig to be built betYYeen the ~ramptans and I:apl3ns un vvaath Cr 28k ~ri'va. ~E'~a u nuar ~t3i u t+ia Dasiyn ~evlei~l °uDard has appr wuVed the praposad "ame 'r1~ i th ni! yCr age l~i?d a proof i cal l y noii"er;i S to nt i onda4l~pe pi 3n. ir'~e f i ilu th i 3 trui y +~w? I ai n ~In linM? nO ~a M ? ~a~ 4an~lr= h , ~w nw 1•Mrn I h n I In •n I+Ililrl r v361~1,~~'i~iini~. Ilf 1i1~114 4i Y~ill~i. rYe iIUYV flad ~U ~u I.Ifi uL.Igll t0 yet appra~alJ I. l! IJU11N 4~ui hw~~ww ww Ow!~5~I~ 1"rwwl~ I'1 r~}}_ A 4h, .}h rwnwr~.. rf+ /fOf1C Qr.}~ ih r`rwnl~ r1r+}} i ltJ {AJG UII f.iUV lil C..1 GGt~ i?1 i Ya. Ml 1111FU1J. it our pl U~IGI I.y Ul itl ~,J LaVlJ tll a GGi\ i!1 1 Ye Cunti~inad eight very large pine trees, Y•Ee Cgr eed tv Cdd tell ii~r c. Tii1S pi3i1 'rYu3 Sublili tt2d to ti'ic ~ics i yl i i:c''i a~r~E °u ~i3r d u'v cr u your 'ugv tC gat Elar liii sj i an to start 1~} ~i 1 d, ng ~ ~r hn~ Iww beg~l i tl IC l UI i.1.w',r4.rU~1111~' U 1 UUi^ i iUTA.aG !.1 if C~rG 'Y'r G4`(~J Ut~U Ul ld ulAl i 111 61,11 IIIJIAJG. 1~.1LIrIVLrd tG IIIavG t'YYo t"e ten na~Y trees f r ant the YYest side tG Cil exposed earner. r rlAA i d n rr~ngnwi{~ in w~ iMwwr~ ~rwww l !w wi Ilw fillr~ Inl,ral.11 Li 1' , 'YY Lam. fl Sri 8 YGn1~U 'Je) IIIIJJIan Vu IIIaY4 LI Iii J4~r ~1 IibJ. T~G nu'N hsYG i 1 YG .~.nr!} w ~ www "n rw~wn~' n° ?hw wy ~,i w i w..r r nw l.~w .~~wrw ~wrwwrl tiNl uCsi ~IrCC;~ ~r.NI u lGt, ~1 ny li iG 'YY e3+. J 1 dG Y f e Yr C I UUi gal ayG. 'ri G Yy GIG 1 Ui ,.GU to span d th~,~IsandJ of do]lars for trees that 'rra can't even see. Indeed, the trees are so thi cl; thst onl y ani rnal s cannnnrppal on that s i d2 of o1,ur ~h+ous~e. Concur i ant ''r~~ i th f.hat d~cii3141i by tii~G 3t~f 1, the UI~LOi d2cidGU to p4~~73 the Caulkln3 hou3e'rYith nII garage and "natural" landscaping. ya'~~r can these decisions possibly be reconciled? tiE{~ bGl IGYe t"at a "i atilr al" IOGi: is nothing iiiGre t~ian 3n er~cuse t0 12t the Nrcperty ga to SEed. In addition, we can not believe that the Town can require us to impend msny thoussnds to landscspe our hawse and then sllo~r a duplex dol~rn the street with outdoor parlci ng. A dupl e;; without garages i s an invitation to turn Booth Creek Crive into an e~stended parking lot. ate urge you to require this house to have adEquatElndaor par'1<inr~ and sn appropriate landscaNing plsn . Sincerely, ~ ~yrcn ~ Sally Rase `f~Q1 fCQ° G~2~'c RECD q~~ _ ~ i990 July 26, 1990 Dear Neighbor: There is presently a house about to go under construction between the Kaplans' and the Framptons' that we believe is totally inappropriate for the . neighborhood. Everyone in the neighborhood has spent significant dollars upgrading their homes, both on,~he interior and exterior, and we do not want to see this house built. We have attached a copy of the letter that both of us have sent to the town expressing our strong concerns. The Design Review Board has approved the house, but we have appealed the decision to the Town Council. Also attached is a picture of a house on Mill Creek Circte that is similar to what the builder is considering. If you agree that this is an inappropriate desi n, there"are two things you can ' ~ do: ,/~!Gt-emu ; ~ ~~e a~ ~ . a ' - ' ~ •3cSa .E~~< ~ ~ 1. Please write to Kent Rose in care of the Town of Vail expressing your strong concern as a resident of Booth Creek. Kent's address is as follows: Mayor Kent Rose Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 2. The Town Council is scheduled to hear the appeal on Tuesday Night, August 7, 1990. We would urge you to attend the Town Council Meeting to express your concern. If you have any questions or ideas, please feel free to contact either of us. Thank you far your support. _ Sincerer, ~ ~ . % G~~ ~~jl arty F ampton Werner Kaplan enclosures /mkl cc: Mayor Kent Rose v ORDINANCE NO. 25 Series of 1990 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 23, THE VAIL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, AND SETTING FORTH THE DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes Special Development Districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and WHEREAS, an application has been made to amend Special Development District No. 23, commonly referred to as The Vail National Bank Building; and WHEREAS, in accordance with section 18.66.140 the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments and has submitted a recommendation to approve said amendments to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the Vail National Banks request to provide limited (6 spaces) off-site parking in the adjacent Vail valley Medical Centers parking structure is a unique and practical solutian, which is consistent with the public interest; and WHEREAS, this solution is a direct result of the comprehensive master planning process for the following, adjacent properties: -Vail National Bank Building property -Vail Valley Medical Center property -Doubletree Hotel property Through a joint effort to master plan access, parking, and other site development, a consolidated parking structure and vehicular access off of South Frontage Road has been created, thereby reducing vehicular traffic on West Meadow Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied, and all other requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town relating to zoning amendments have been fully satisfied. Section 2. The Town Council finds that the procedures set forth for amendments to Special Development Districts in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied. Section 3. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1989 is hereby amended with the addition of subparagraph 3 to read as follows: The development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Sidney Schultz-Architect AIA, and consists of the following documents: 3. Architectural Plans designated as Sheets Al ind A2, dated December 26, 1989. Section 4. Section 5, Paragraph E. of Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1989 is hereby amended to read as follows: E. Parking Parking demands of this development shall be met in accordance with the off-street parking requirements for specified uses as stated in Section 18.52 of the Vail Municipal Code. Six parking spaces required by this development shall be provided in the: adjacent Vail Valley Medical Center parking structure. Shall any additional parking be required for future expansions or redevelopment, said pa,rkinq shall be provided on-site at the Vail National Bank building property. Section 5. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1989 i.s hereby amended by the addition of subparagraphs 5-6 to read as follows: 5. The Vail National Bank Building shall not occupy the expanded premises as shown on architectural plans A-1 and A-2 unless Vail Valley Medical Center has received a Temporary Certificate of Occupanc~~ for the parking structure. 6. The Vail National Bank Building agrees that if for some unforseen reason the Vail Valley Medical Center's parking structure is not completed, the newly constructed deck enclosure shall only be allowed to be used for common storage. i Section 6. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, c]_ause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid,.sich decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereb]i declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardles:a of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 2 I Section 7. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and inhabitants thereof. Section 8. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 9. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,, inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS 3rd day Of July , 1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 3rd day of July , 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this 3rd day of July , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk 3 ~~ti town of nail 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2105 office of town manager MEMORANDUM TO: Kristan Pritz, Director Community Development Dep ent FROM: Ron Phillips, Town Manage DATE: August 7, 1990 SUBJECT: The Byrne Residence, Lot 6, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing The Town Council has asked me to appeal the staff approval of the Byrne residence noted above to the Design Review Board. The Council's concern is that the additional rock walls add to the bulk and mass of the residence to result in an impact that is neither compatible with the neighborhood nor sensitive to the site. RUP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council 7Ga.~ L~iv~c~ebca~ MR. AND MRS. ROY JOHN~~1viQ 2925 A BOO'T'H CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 nu;~AUG-fi1990 August 6, 1990 The Honorable Kent Rose Mayor of the Town of Vail The Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road . Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Rose: My wife and I are strongly ~~.~sed to the design of the new residence-proposed for Lot 4, 11th Filing in the Town of Vail. We feel that the design of the home does not fit in to the theme of our neighborhood and that the above home would dramatically decrease the value of our home and property, as well as, our neighbors properties. Ve truly yours, Mr. and Mrs. Johnston ALLAN D . VANDEFORD REC'~ AUG - 6190 2905 Booth Creek Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 303-476-0820 6 August, 1990 Mayor Kent Rose & Town Council Town of Vail ' 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Kent: As you are aware, I am the property owner of Lot 1, Block 2 of the Vail Eleventh Filing. This property lies in close proximity to a proposed new dwelling on Lot 4 of this same filing. I have just returned from a protracted visit outside the States to find that the construction proposal has been reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. Kent, I have reviewed the plan for this residence and have visited the site of the previously constructed Caulkins' residence on Mill Creek Circle, the design of which is to be reproduced on Booth Creek Drive. This concept, in my opinion, would be a disruption of the continuity in design reflected within the neighborhood and could thereby have a considerable negative influence on the financial stability of the area considered. I would like to request that the Design Review Board be directed to re-evaluate the proposal with an eye to the overall effect, both visual and financial, that might be expected from such an incompatible plan. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, lan & Ma an ord D ~ ~ REG'D AUG - 61990 v D D TOWl~i OF FRASER 'Icebox of the Nation" Box 20 1 153 Fraser Avenue 6a~ c90 Fraser, Colorado 80442 ~6o Ope 726-5491 August 2, 1990 Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, Co. 81657 Dear Ron, Enclosed is a resolution passed by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser concerning Federal land exchanges. Although the resolution is more generic than the sample you sent us, I believe that the message that Forest Service procedures and local government planning policies should not be circumvented by congressional action is clear. I hope that this will assist you in your efforts. Sincerely yours, Clay on G. Brown Town Manager y . ~ j .r " RECD AUG - 61990 RESOLUTION 8-1-90 A RESOLUTION COPICEF;PIING CURREPIT PRACTICES BY TFiE FEDEP.AL GOVERNMENT IN THE 1~CQUISITION AND TP.ADIPIG OF PUBLIC LANDS WHEREAS, much of Gr°and County and land surrounding the municipalities of said county are under th.e ownership and control of the federal Government; and, WHEREAS, the town of Fraser, and other municipalities have the right and responsibility of regulating land use within and adjacent to the mu~zicipal boundaries; and, WHEREAS, Federal a~~encies are petitioned from time to time by private iradividual;s wishing to acquire certain Federal lands found to be desirable; and, WHEREAS, upon occasion, individuals seeking to acquire federal parcels have sought to bypass the administrative process by seeking direct Congressional action; and, WHEREAS, such federal land trades or acquisitions may be contrary to the municipality's master land use plan; and, WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser strongly believes in the principle that local land use decisions are best made at the local level, PJOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FFtASER COLORADO: THAT, the Town calls upon Federal agencies to work with local governments adjoining federal lands whenever said lands are proposed for e~cche.nge or trade ; and, THAT, the Federal government honor and respect the municipality's adopted master land use plan for the public and private property c~?ithin and adjoining the municipality; and, THAT, members of t:he Congressional delegation are respectfully requested to refr~rin from introducing private bill legislation authorizing trades or e~tchanges of Federal property which are contrary to the local government's land use plan; and, THAT, the Federal government should allow and permit only those lands trades within and adjoining municipalities specifically endorsed and approved by the municipality. ~ UVED THIS DAY O 1990. DULY MOVED AND AP1.R ~ ~ i ~ )~J BY l ;11~)~.~-^- C . B . y~Jensen , Mayor ATT$ST: Virg'n a Winter, Town Clerk (Seal) EchoRanch, Inc. P.O. Box 1567 Avon, Colorado 81620 July 30, 1990 Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 On behalf of the Board of Directors and the children at Echo Ranch, I wish to extend our many thanks to the Town of Vail far your continued support in the tremendous donation of $2,000.00 for 1990. Your gift to Echo Ranch is greatly appreciated and will be used to meet the continuing needs of the child- ren. Thank you for supporting Echo Ranch, "The home for kids who can't go home." Sincerely, C Kevin Lindahl, President for the Board of Directors KL/mpw A Colorado not for profit corporation. Managed by Volunteers of Amenca i TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 7, 1990 RE: Town Board Compensation Town Council asked the staff to investigate how other Town Boards are compensated in similar communities to Vail. Attached to this memo is a chart which lists compensation for the Mayor, Council Members and Planning Board, and Board of Adjustment for 11 towns and 2 counties. Given this information, the staff makes the following recommendations. . PRESENT _ _ _ " PROPOSED COUNCII. Mayor: $500 per month ' > $1000 per month Council: x200 per month ' $ 400 per month PEC & DRB' BIue;Parkmg Pass; and ! Blue Parking Pass, and , ;Tennis`Pass; and " Golf;Pass; and Ice .Skating Pass Tennis Pass; and Ice Skating; and ' or: : ; `.Ski Pass.*; Golf Pass LIQUOR BOARD Blue'Parkin `Pass' and' Tennis Pass• and 9 ::::::::::::::Tennis Pass~?ard; Skatin Pass; and 9 . tce Skating Pass. " " Blue Parking Pass or............ or Golf Pass Golf Pass ART IN PUBLIC None _ ..::Same as PEACES 'BOARD .liquor ,Board • On same basis as Council passes. Staff feels it is appropriate to increase the compensation in the form of various passes for these boards due to the significant amount of time and effort they give to community service. i C A ON:::>>:::>::<><::::::::::: :.::.:::.:.:::::::::.::.:...:::::::::.:..;;TOWN::::::0:::: S.:C:O ~ > CO ARI O . U4N N 1 ~ G/BOA/:<<>~< I L UNC CO Z~ NI G M~ ERS>~~~~. >~~~~Iu1AY0~~`~`~~~' MEMBERS O. VAIL: ;:><::>:>::>:>::::::$50000:. $200.00 a V I tee 600.00.'' :`<>:><:`:<:: 400.00;:::>::>:<:>.::::..:.:. o U i STEAM BOAT:::::>::::;>;:><>:<::;::::>:>:~:::::: $ . Valu tee DURANGO: ><><><~<<$30000;; $200.00 ' ` r G I ass V ~~~~I~~~~n e o :::::::::;;:::>:::;;:<:::<::> 300.00»><::>:::::::::... o u to B,~LCF~EN,RIDG:E~ :::>:>::::»:>::::>:::::::::::::$5000b.::..::.; $ p n meet 00 .0 50 0 $ CRESTED BUTTE <»><>>> <$:1:00 0.. $ ..:...9 V tee BOULD~R..;:..:;:::.;::.:;.:: ;:.:<::;::.:<.;:.;:.;::.::;.:$1.00.00;; ::::>::»:::;::>:<:>::>:::::~:100,0 .:::>::<;:<::<>::..:.;:.<...:o. u.:...:.:.~ ASPEN: <><_~<><~$8bb~00 $550.00 1/oluntee F . 500.00.:..;:.;:;:.::.;;;;:;:.;:.;:«.:$200,00:;.;;:<.;;:.;::;.:.>:.;:..$1,00..00/ ~ ..::::::.:.:::;;g::;<.:.;:<.;:<.::.;:.;:.;:.::. AVON;<:>:::<:;::»::::::>::»::>::;:>:<:::::::>:>:>:>;::>:::<.::::~ :.::.;:;.:;n.:: , ::::::>:<:>:::><:::>:<:>:<:::>::>:<:::>:>:>:<:>>»:<::<:>::>:::>:: <:::>::::>::<>:::>:~:»<::~::>:<:>::`<~< 200:00/ >::«::::I~ ~ n e . ::<:::>::>::<:>:>:»::>::>.$~0000.> $400.00 o.:u::. e... ~ . TELLURIDE: ~ ~ `I".COLLINS::;:<::»:>::::<:>:<:>:::::>:>::<:::»:$35b00.>>::<:::»:«:>::>::<>::>>::>::$X50,00:<.:>:.;:.;:.;:.;;:;:::..:o u G:::.::. . ::>::>:;{n e GREELEY: >~>><<:$75000 $500.00 Volu.... te i COUN i ir,S COUNTYCOMMISS.LONERS~'~<<~''~~ COUNTY PLANNING BOARD > r e I me V u 0 ASPEN: :><<;:$23;000 EAG.LE.::::>::::»::>;::><::>::>::>>::>:.>::>::>::>:~:;:::$32,000.00:;:.;:.::.;:<.;:~:.;:.;:.;; I I town of nail 75 south frontage road veil, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2116 MEMORANDUM TO : Vail Town Counc FROM: Steve Barwick DATE: August 6, 1990 RE: Proposed 1991 Capital Projects Please find attached the proposed 1991 Capital Projects for the Town of Vail. The projects are listed in proposed priority order and an explanation sheet has been included for each 1991 project. Please bring this packet to tomorrow's work session as this item is scheduled for discussion. SHB/ds CAPSCHDI Revised: 8/ 5/1990 ~ 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS REQUIRED PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 CONDITIONS/COMMENTS 1. VTC Community Improvements 563,000 2. Willow Bridge Replacement 320,000 $280,000 in State revenue 3. Bus Replacement 241,500 241,500 241,500 Assumes 3 yr lease/purchase 4. Finish Interior of New Ski Museum 160,000 5. Pave Ford Park Parking Lot 230,000 SUBTOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS 1,284,500 471,500 241,500 0 0 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1. Replace Fire Dept Breathing Apparatus 34,960 2. New Town Snow Dump 210,000 3. Street Maint. & Improvements 1,464,576 1,844,400 1,629,120 1,879,500 1,647,840 Per street maintenance plan 4. Snow Dump Road/Overlay Shops Complex 200,000 5. Holy Cross Parcel Purchase 56,500 63,539 63,539 63,539 63,539 14 yr debt service 6. Berry Creek 5th Filing Debt Service 173,000 173,000 173,000 173,000 173,000 10 yr debt service 7. Bus Replacement Program 513,000 897,000 1,125,000 989,000 Bus Fleet Replacement by 1996 8. Parking Structures Maintenance 35,000 440,000 330,000 220,000 200,000 Per asset maintenance Plan 9. Town Shops Maintenance & Improvements 300,000 375,000 400,000 370,000 Per shops plan 10. Communications System Maint. & Replcmnt 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Ongoing radio replacement 11. Recreation Paths Maintenance 81,000 85,000 89,000 93,000 98,000 Per paths maintenance plan 12. Miscellaneous Building Maintenance 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Per RAM Committee plan 13. Municipal Complex 457,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 New Fire & Police Building 14. Space Needs Fixes ? 15. Fire Truck Replacement 250,000 375,000 Per Fire Truck Replacement Plan 16. Additional Buses 171,000 187,000 Additions to bus fleet 17. Street Lights 30,000 3(1,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Per street light plan 18. Dobson Arena Flooring 15,000 19. Bus Shelter Improvements 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 20. Chapel Bridge Replacement 35,000 365,000 $320,000 in State revenue 21. Pedestrian Overpass 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 22. Fire Extrication Equipment 16,000 SUBTOTAL ESSENTIAL PROJECTS 2,827,036 4,524,939 4,557,659 4,761,039 4,536,379 DESIRABLE PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1. Ford Park Sidewalk Improvements 115,000 2. Replace Pulis Bridge 275,000 3. Implement Master Transportation Plan 575,000 575,000 575,000 575,000 575,000 4. Street Furniture 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SUBTOTAL DESIRABLE PROJECTS 985,000 595,000 595,000 595,000 595,000 ti CAPSCHDO Revised: 8/ 5/1990 TOWN OF VAIL REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROPOSED PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 CONDITIONS/COMMENTS 1. West Vail Park Purchase Debt Service 72,086 67,436 62,784 2. Golf Maintenance Parcel 94,000 94,000 3. Landscape Improvement Pro3ect 172,000 147,000 128,000 124,000 124,000 Per Landscape Plan 4. Gore Creek Promenade 74,000 5. Ski Museum Demolition, Park Construction 27,000 6. Stevens Park Construction 151,000 145,000 7. Parks, Open Space, & Mountain Recreation Trails Master Plan/Feasibility Study 60,000 8. Donovan Park Revegetation 7,000 9. Sidewalk Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 10. Dowd Junction Recreation Path 275,000 11. Village Trans Ctr to Athletic Field Path 350,000 12. Donovan Park 84,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 13. Vail Das Schone Recreation Trail 85,500 14. Ford Park Lower Bench Improvements 15. Athletic Field Restrooms 150,000 16. Buffehr Creek Park Tot Play Area 6,000 17. Mill Creek Landscaping 15,000 18. Ford Park_ Skating/Fishing Pond 84,000 TOTAL 982,086 1,028,936 815,784 584,000 668,000 * Source of funding undecided. ULI~ARIMENT DIYISIUN • PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION CENTER - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION CENTER FUND A AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING b STREET 563000 563000 DEVELOPMENTS R IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE 4 PLANT DEVLEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 563000 563000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 563000 563000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1791 TOTAL PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS i TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION LANDSCAPING b IRRIGATION 195000 ~~d u ~ ~c.~ RETAINING MALLS. LIGHTING. SIDEMALKS. PLANTERS, PEDESTRIAN AREAS 293000 (PCL BID) f 15Ti DISCOUNT. PREPARATION 8 CONTINGENCY 75000 TOTAL 563000 SUBMITTED BY: T000 OPPENNEiMER DATE: TOWN OF VAIL - PROPUSEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DAZE: PRQTECT TITLE: WILLOW BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACE SUBSTANDARD WILLOW BRIDGE FUND ~ ANO TITLE: 10 AND CDOH PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 20000 20000 LANG AC.GUISITION SITE. LANOSCAPINO 6 STREET 300000 300000 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE b PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL 10 b CDOH 320000 320000 PROJECT FUNDING CDOH FUNDS 280000 280000 TOWN OF VAIL CAPITAL 40000 40000 TOTAL 10 6 COON 320000 320000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED IFTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY . OPERATING SERVICES 4 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL 10 6 CDOH FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL / TOWN PROJECTS /Qe ; ~~c COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION BRIDGE FUNDS HAVE BEEN SECURED FROM COON. DESIGN WAS BEr,UN tN 1990 ~ ' AND WILL BE FINISHED IN 1991. PROJECT INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF WILLOW BRIDGE 6 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. IMPROVEMENTS WILL ENHANCE SEPARATION OF VEHICLES AHD PEDESTRIANS, AND POSSIBLY ADD ADDITIONAL TRUCK LOADING AREA. SUBMIT?ED BY: GREG HALL DATE: TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: BUS REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACE WORN OUT TRANSIT BUSES FUNO M ANO TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS ~ 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 11 STREET OEVEIOPMENTS b IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE 6 PLANT 241500 754500 1138500 1125000 989000 4248500 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 241500 754500 1138500 1125000 989000 4248500 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 241500 754500 1138500 1125000 989000 4248500 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1991 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~nP v ' CONTINUE REPLACEMENT Of .3 MORN-OUT BUSES HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY LEr,ISLATION (MANDATING WHEELCHAIR LIFTS) MAY IMPROVE COSTS BEGINNING 1992 225,000/BUS SUBMiTTE0 8Y: STAN BERRYMAN DATE- ~ ~ TOMN OF VAIL Bus Replacement Schedule ITEM 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 REPLACE 4 1979 BUSES 241500 241500 241500 REPLACE 3 - 1979 BUSES 513000 REPLACE S - 1981 BUSES 897000 REPLACE 5 1981 BUSES 938000 REPLACE 1 1982 BUS 187000 REPLACE S - 191 BUSES 989000 TOTAL BUS COSTS 241500 754500 1138500 1125000 989000 TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPARTMENI'~ ~DI VISION I Administrative Services ROJECT TITLE: ROJECC STARTING DATE: Finish Interior of New Ski Museum ~R07ECI'COMPLETIONDATE: ROJECTDESCRIPTIONANDLOCATION I The Town has agreed to do the basic finish work on the 4,000 sq. ft. of space to be leased to the Colorado Ski Museum. UND N AND TITLE: KVJLI.I I.VJ 1 J 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 P(>ST t 995 1 U 1 AL LANNING/DESIGN ACQUISITION ITE, LANDSCAPING & TREET DEVELOPMENT MPROVEMENTS Construction t'.ncra $160.000 OTAL X160.000 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL UTURE OPERATING 1993 1994 ~ ~ 1995 1 U 1 AL PRIORI"I'Y OSTS RATING AMONG DEPARTMENT W PERSONNEL PR0IECTS ONLY DED (FI'E) PERSONNEL COSTS PERATING SERVICES SUPPLIES APITAL OUTLAYS I I I I ~ I I I ~ I I 1... AMUNC, ALL UTURE REVENUE TOWN PRO ^ OMMENTS AND 7USTIFICATiON~ SUBMITTED BY: DATE: TOMN OF VAII - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FORD PARK PARKING LOT , PAVING ANO IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COMPIEiION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION FORMULIZE FORD PARK PARKING lOT MILL REWIRE COON ACCESS PERMIT FUND N AND TITLE: 10 - SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT PROJECT COSTS 1992 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 29610 29E10 LAND ACWISITION 31TE. LANOSCAPTNO b STREET 197G00 197600 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 227210 227210 PROJECT FUND(NO 10TA1 - 10 227210 227210 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1992 TOTAL PRIORITY , NEM PERSONNEL NEEOEO (FTE1 RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT AlL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS ~ COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION POSTPONED FOR 1991 PAVING Of THE LOT MAS REWIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL @Y THE PLANNING ANO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. FORMILIZATION OF THE PARKTNG LOT MTLL REWIRE AN ACCESS PERMIT FROM THE CDOH. THIS Mill REWIRE ADDITIONAL LANEAGE ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: 'DOWN OF .~L -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMP. 'VEMENT PROJECT . ' u~nR-I7+~1~NI~ PIVISIGN~ Fire Department ~Raurx-r lrn~: ROJECf STARTING DATE: 1 / 91 Breathing Apparatus Replacement ~ROTFrC'I'OOIvlp1E1TONDATE: 6/91 RorECr DESC.~urLTON wrm LACAnoN ~ ' See attached sheet ND «AND TCIlE: ,.wz.., vw,o ,vv~ IYSI~! ly~K~ lyya ~srsrs ~r,~os, I IuAAL LANNING/DESIGN AOQL~,,,ON LA1 v.,.t.,APIIdG ~ DEV'Vl;3~DPIrffNI MPROVFJ,¢IdTS oTnt' 34.960.00 ROJL•C? FUNDING OTAL •UTURL-OPERATING 1993 1994 ~IUTAL' PRIORITY ~ i ~ RATWG AMON DEPARTMENT EW PERSONNEL, PROJF.C1'S ONLY ED (FfE) PERSONNEL l..w, ~ PERATING SERVICES SUPPLIES ITAL OUIiJ1YS OTAL iw,u,vu rul, UTURE REVENUE TOWN PR ~SS~-:~:..~ I sL>BL,,.,~sY: Dick Duran n~.TF: June 29, 1990 ~ \ i BREATHING APPARATUS REPLACEMENT Our current Self Contained Breathing Apparatus is old and maintenance cost is on the increase, not to mention down time. We also have units that are no longer recognized by OSHA, N. F. P.A. , or NIOSH, which can be a liability issue. Normally we should have two spare cylinders for each S.C.B.A. The following is our request: 16 XL 30 Survivair S.C.B.A. @$1,535.00 ea.......$24,560.00 20 Spare aluminum cylinders @ 335.00 ea.........6,700.00 1 Survivair test bench* @ 3,700.00 ea........ 3.700.00 TOTAL......$34,960.00 * This year three of us attended a repair class and passed our certification to repair survivair equipment. This will save us money, but a test bench in needed to insure adjustments are correct. TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OEPARTMENI DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: NEW TOWN OF VAIL SNOW DUMP PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION FUNO • AND TITLE: !0 PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 30000 30000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING ~ STREET 180000 180000 DEVELOPMENTS ~ IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE 4 PLANT DEVEEOPMENTS d. IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 210000 210000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 210000 210000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TO1AL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES ~ SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION „ PROJECT COSTS ARE ONLY ESTIMATED AT THIS TIME SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: r. TOWN OF VAIL - Pn,.~~~oED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRQTECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PRQTECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STREET IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT pESCRIPTTON AND LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND • AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 1444576 1844100 1629120 1879500 1647840 1622840 10088276 DEVELOPMENTS 3 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVEEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - !0 1464576 1844400 1629120 1879500 1647840 1622840 10088276 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 1464576 1844400 1629120 1879500 1647840 1622840 10088276 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FIE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ~ TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION CONTINUES CURRENT ON-GOING PROGRAM SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN GATE: 3 - ti f !STREET IMPROV~:MENTS - 199 ROAD COST Booth Falls Road $ 137,500 Booth Falls Court $ 87,500 Bald Mountain Road $ 375,000 Mann's Ranch Road $ 112,500 Katsos Ranch Road $ 187,500 Aspen Lane $ 56,800 Aspen Court $ 17,600 Booth Falls Drive S 104000 Subtotal $1,078,400 Test Seal (West Vail) $ 30,000 Maintenance Patching S 100,000 Engineering, Surveying, $ 181,176 Construction Management and Testing 1991 Engineering 1992 S 75.000 Total $1,464,576 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1992 ' T ESTIMATED ROAD LENGTH COST Vail Valley Drive 7800 $ 624,000 Eagle's Nest Circle 200 $ 16,000 Homestake Circle 400 $ 32,000 Fairway Drive 800 $ 64,000 Fairway Court 200 $ 16,000 Hornsilver Circle 550 $ 44,000 Cabin Circle 250 $ 20,000 Ptarmigan Road 1800 S 144,000 Spring Hill Lane 450 $ 36,000 Sunburst Drive 2850 $ 228,000 Mill Creek Circle 1200 S 96.000 Subtotal $1,:.20, 000 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 225,000 Coating (West Vail) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 224,400 Management and Testing 1992 Engineering 1993 S 75.000 Total $1,844,400 1 ` STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 199 ESTIMATED jtOAD ~ENGTI~ COST Bridge Road 550 $ 44,000 Nugget Lane 800 $ 64,000 Columbine Drive 2250 $ 180,000 Spruce Way 2250 $ 180,000 Spruce Drive 150 $ 12,000 Streamside Circle 2300 $ 184,000 Meadow Drive 4400 $ 352,000 Juniper Lane 1500 S ~Q.000 Subtotal $1,136,000 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 225,000 Coating (Main Vail) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 193,120 Management and Testing 1993 Engineering 1994 S 75.000 Total $1,629,120 ~ !STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1994 ESTIMATED ROAD LENGTH COST Lionsridge Loop 5300 $ 530,000 Buffehr Creek Road 6800 $ 680,000 Circle Drive 500 $ 50,000 Meadow Ridge Road 900 S 90.000, Subtotal $1,350,000 Maintenance Paving and Seal ~ $ 225,000 Coating (Sandstone) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 229,500 Management and Testing 1994 Engineering 1995 S 75.000 Total $1,879,500 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1995 ESTIMATED ~20AD j,ENGTH COS'~_ Meadow Lane 1000 $ 80,000 Gore Circle 1300 $ 104,000 Main Gore Drive 5100 $ 408,000 Kel-Gar Lane 550 $ 44,000 Black Gore Drive 2200 $ 176,000 Grouse Lane 550 $ 44,000 Ute Lane 250 $ 20,000 Snowshoe Lane 500 $ 40,000 Lupine Drive 2600 $ 208,000 Willow Way 350 S 28,000 Subtotal $1,152,000 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 225,000 Coating (Intermountain) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 195,840 Management and Testing 1995 Engineering 1996 S 75,000 Total $1,647,840 A !STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1996 ESTIMATED #20AD ~.ENGTH COST Greenhill Court 1450 $ 145,000 Westhaven Circle 3100 $ 310,000 Westhaven Drive 350 $ 35,000 Westhaven Lane 1000 $ 100,000 Alta Circle 200 $ 2,000 West Gore Creek Drive 2500 $ 200,000 Matterhorn Circle 3570 $ 357,000 Shasta Place 300 S 3.000 Subtotal $1,152,000 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 225 000 .Coating (Bald Mountain) ~ Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 195,840 Management and Testing 1996 Engineering 1997 S 50.000 Total $1,622,840 sIAEEI IW1ECi sYllllr un 1IN ~ lln nl m m al tf5 1»/ m m trlf :111 :Nl :N2 2N3 eN 1ECONllllltl 1. ?Ul f0AE11 SIN1101E 11EY0111111 U F IT IYIE IOp1I11E NILE IlE1 LrN ltlllf 1 111011 1011 1111A E . rill ffFlr . i/il Y11EMN1 (OISIEY 1,I11,IM 11,SN,N1 1,15i,N1 p,1S1,N1 I1,1S2,N1 rl EWr 11,331,111 WI 11M,N1 (3 IIlEl) ~ IS11.111 EIGIIEEIIN I I 12SI,1N 1211,N1 1211,111 IIN,SN 1211,IN 1211,111 gN,NI l1M,N1 11N,N1 IIN,NI 11N,N1 fiN,NO 11N,N1 I1N,N1 I I I I IAl11ElAltE 1131,N1 ittS,lll 122S,N1 I22S,N1 g2S,N1 I21S,111 122S,M1 l2JS,N1 1225,101 i22S,101 f22S,N1 1225,N1 122S,N1 1225,N0 ?A1t11116 (1JI,N1 1. llll WAEII NNIIQN I1tEY011pi1 YU IOIF 111 IY3E 1101311NE 2N IYSE ilEl rllUiE IIC101M SAM03101E AM/ SEAIIMi 1E31 3EIl IOY ~ IONllll WIIItE E. I/IL U01 E. 1111 lIN 1. rill YII 1. lul? rul OrEWr 1500.11( ISN,NI 1150,N1 3351,111 3ISO,N1 f31S,N1 II15,N1 g1S,N1 1. /lll FOAE31 f1111fOME I11EIl01MI1A11 YU NN 10YI111M f01A1 I I 1 fl /1S 1N it NI 110 l 121 121 1 111 SN 111 I , 13 , f , 131, ,NI ~ it Hl W/~ 11 325 NI Il 125 IN ills NI I /1S NI J lS NI 1N NI IN 1 I 3 H 3 NI N NI . J ~ ~1 11 , . TOMN OF VAiI - P.rur..~EO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: SNOM DUMP ROAD OVERLAY SFIOPS COMPLEX 1 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ~ PROVIDE ADEQUATE SURFACE TO SUPPORT INCREASED HAUL TRAFFIC REQUIRED BY NEM SNON DUMP FUND f ANO TTTIE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LANG ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING b STREET 200000 200000 DEVELOPMENTS i IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 200000 200000 PROJECT FUNDING TO1Al - 10 200000 200000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TOTAL PRIORITY NEN PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT Alt PERSONNEL COSTS PROTECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REYENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TONN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~ SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DAZE: TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPAR7'MEN"I'~ DIVISION Administrative Services RUJr.~.l iiTLE: ~ROJECT STARTING DATE: Holy Cross Parcel Purchase ROJECTCOMPL.ETTONDATE: ROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LACATION UND q AND TIT1E: xw r.~, t wa i a ] 991 1992 1493 1994 l 995 Pf7$T 1995 1 U 1 A L LANNING/DESIGN ACQUISITION 5Fi.5~(l F,~.5~4 ~~.5'14 F,4.5~q 63.539 635.390 946.046 ITE, LANDSCAPING 8c TREET DEVELOPMENT MPROVEMENT'S oTAL 56,500 63,539 63,539 63,539 63,539 635,390 946,046 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL UTURE OPERATING 1993 1994 PRIORI7~Y OSTS RATING AMONG DEPART'MENT' EW PERSONNEL PROJECT'S ONLY ED (FTE) PERSONNEL COSTS PERATING SER VICES SUPPLIES APITAL OUTLAYS OTAL I I AMVIVU HLL UTURE REVENUE TOWN PRQI he _ /)1 GSS~~~1 OMMENTS AND JCISTIFICATION~ The current proposal for the purchase of this site is based upon a price of $565,500. Debt payments continue for 14 years at 8.5~. Staff will attempt to get abetter SUBMITTED BY: DATE: TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPARTMENT~ 'DIVISION I Administrative Services ROJECT TITLE: ~ROJECT STARTING DATE: Berry Creek 5th Filing Debt Service ROJECTOOMPLETIONDATE: ROJECTDESCRIPTIONANDLOCATION I This debt service schedule assumed that the Town of Vail enters into an intergovernmental agreement which repays the entire purchase price~~to the Town, the $173,000/year would be Vail's cost based upon an assessed UND~"ANIl''Ci;,..c: ~a.~~.,..~.tieY: ~xvrn~, i ~w t ~ 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 P[7ST t 995 1 U 1 AL LAAINING/DESIGN ACQUISITION $173,000 $173,000 $173,000 $173,000 $173,000 ITE, LANDSCAPING 8r. TREET DEVELOPMENT MPROVEMENTS OTAL ROJECT FUNDING OTAL UTUREOPERATING 1993 ~ 1994 1995 IUTAL PRIORITY OSTS RATING AMONG DEPARTM ENI' EW PERSONNEL PROJECTS ONLY EDED (FI'E) PERSONNEL COSTS PERATING SERVICES SUPPLIES APITAL OUTLAYS I I ~ I I OTAL I UTURE TOWN PRO]E RnM ~)JF.CT Ess 6 OMMENfS AND JUSTIFICATION' SUBMITTED BY: DATE: ' ~ f ' r TOMN Of VAII - P.+~'r„~ED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRATECi DEPARTMENT DIYISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTTNG DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKING STRUCTURES CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AHO LOCATION 3EE ATTACHMENT FUND ! AND TITLE: 10 ' PROJECT COSTS 1491 1992 1993 1991 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING b STREET OEVEIOPMENT3 b 1MPROVEMENT3 BUIl01NG, STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVEMENTS 35000 110000 330000 220000 100000 1225000 TOTAL - !0 35000 110000 330000 220000 200000 1225000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 35000 140000 330000 220000 200000 1225000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS L??t l?92 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PftIOR1TY N[M PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATINGS AMONU DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPl1ES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION Q CONTINUES CURRENT PROGRAM ~ SS""'* SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: O ~i ~ , ~ ~ t `PARKING STRUCTURES - CAPITA~ ASSET MAINTENANCE 1991 --1996 X991, Crack repair walls (VTRC) $ 5,000 Replace control joints (LHTRC) $ 20,000 Engineering 5 year program development S 10,000 Total $ 35,000 1992 Complete bus terminal retrofit (PCL bidj $ 235,000 Computerize parking equipment (LHTRC) $ 100,000 Remodel 4th level terminal building (VTRC) $ 50,000 Install generator (LHTRC) $ 15,000 Seal, joint repair and deck maintenance S 40,000 (VTRC lower levels) Total $ 440,000 1993 Seal decks (LHTRC - 5 year) $ 100,000 HSP joints (top deck - LHTRC) $ 150,000 Seal, joint and control cracks (VTRC - $ 40,000 old 2nd level) Computerize West Day Lot S 40.000 Total $ 330,000 1994 VTRC Engineering Study Condition $ 20,000 Joint ~ crack control (LHTRC - 2nd north) $ 40,000 Light replacement (LHTRCj $ 100,000 VTRC lower level final phase (1st concrete) $ 40,000 Trash compactor (LHTRCj S 20.000 Total $ 220,000 1995 Implement 1994 Condition Study of $ 100,000 VTRC repairs (most likely top deck seal and joints) Joint and crack control (LHTRC - 2nd south) $ 40,000 LHTRC concrete replacement S 60.000 (1st north & south) Total $ 200,000 .~r+ 1 TOWN OF PAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING GATE: PROJECT TITLE: TOWN SHOPS AND BUS BARN CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND 1i AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 199? 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LANG ACCUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 6 STREET DEVELOPMENTS 3 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS K IMPROVEMENTS 0 300000 375000 400000 370000 1445000 TOTAL - 10 0 300000 375000 400000 370000 1445000 PRWECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 0 300000 375000 400000 370000 1445000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FIE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 4 " CONTINUES CURRENT FIVE-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ~ S S (~i SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: TOWN SHOPS CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 1991 - 1995 Old Town Shops Replacement $1,350,000 Butler Building Storage (When shops go to UEVWSD) 1992 Enlarge Administration Building S 300.000 (1000 sq. ft. - storage., file room, copy room) (2000 sq. ft. - bus driver's lockers, showers, storage and offices) Total $ 300,000 1993 Install fire sprinkling system (shops) $ 95,000 Construct two additional operating $ 250,000 bays (1250 sq. ft. each) Install retaining wall - shops tunnel S 30.000 Total $ 375,000 1994 Retrofit building exteriors, plumbing S 400.000 HVAC and electrical Total $ 400,000 1995 Construct two additional operating $ 250,000 bays (1250 sq. ft. each) Construct bus barn bay extensions S 120,000 to accommodate 35' buses Total $ 370,000 TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPARTMEN7~ r.~c v,.,,.V~N~ Police ROJEC'I' TITLE: ROJECf STARTING DATE: 1 / 1 / 91 Communi cat ions ~RQTEC'I' OOMPLETION DATE: 12 / 31 / 91 ROJECI DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION These are on-going costs associated with replacement of portable and mobile radios, payers, and other town-wide communications needs. urro a AND TITLE ~ • nw c~, i wa i a 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 POCT 1995 1 V 1 AL LANNING/DESIGN ACQUISITION ITE, LANDSCAPING do TREEI' DEVETAPMENf MPROVEMEN•IS Communications Eqpt. Program 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 85,000 ornL ~ 20,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 85,000 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL • UTURE OPERATING 1991 199E 1993 1994 1995 1 U 1 AL pRI V~ i OS•IS RATING AMON DEPARTMENT EW PERSONNEL PROJECT'S ONLY EDED (FI'E) LL PERSONNEL wa i ~ PERATING S1~tVICIs • SUPPLJIs PITAL OUTIAYS 1 I OTAL I I ~ I I Anlunv wu., UTURE REVENUE TOWN PR f:T v EssG.a~-,~-1 ~ • OMMENTS AND JUSTiF[CATION' The 1991 and 1992 requests for $20,000 are due to the 1990 request of $15,000 being deleted. The 1993 and beyond requests are standard on-going requests. t SUBM111cuBY: ~ ~ ~ DATE e.,~,..+ ~ loon TOMN OF VAIL - , ~a~ED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT 9TARTINO DATE: PRQTECT TITLE: RECREATIONAL PATHS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PRQTECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND S AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGH- lANO ACQUISITION S1iE, LANDSCAPING 8 STREET 81000 85000 89000 93000 98000 446000 DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVEMENTS 8UILOING. STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS i01AL - 10 81000 85000 89000 93000 98000 146000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - !0 81000 85000 89000 93000 98000 446000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1991 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION J i. CONTINUES CURRENT FIVE-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ,rS S SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN GATE: . ~t , 1991 - 1995 BIKE PATH MAINTENANCE PLAN ~TEP+~ ~99~ ~99~ X993, ~99~} X995 PATCHING 22,300 26,300 30,300 34,300 39,300 OVERLAY 15, 000 15, 000 15, 000 15, 000 15,000 SIGNAGE 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 ROCK REMOVAL 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 VEGETATION CONTROL 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 CRACK SEALING 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 DRAINAGE IMPROVE. 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 SWEEPING 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 FILL AREAS 3, 000 3, 000 3, 000 3, 000 3,000 BARRICADES 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 REFLECTORS 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 ROCKFALL 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 STRUCTURAL IMPROVE. 7.000 7.000 x.000 x.000 7.000 TOTAL/YEAR 81, 000 85, 000 89, 000 93, 000 98,000 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: TOWN FACILITIES CAP1iAl ASSET MAINTENANCE pR00RAM LRAM) PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION FUND N ANO TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL _ PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING d STREET DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE R PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS 50000 50000 25000 25000 25000 175000 TOTAL - 10 50000 50000 25000 25000 25000 175000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 50000 50000 25000 25000 25000 175000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALl TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ~iL PROJECTS TO BE DESIGNATED C SS-~-~'a..~ II SUBMITTED BY BERRYMAN/ROSE DATE: Z TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPAR'fMEN71 ~IVLSION~ Police ROIECT TITLE: ROJECT STARTING DATE: L I 1 ~ 91 Municipal Complex Redevelopment ROJECTOOMPLETIONDATE 1996 ROJEC?Di:'SCRIPTiONANDLACATION ( This proposal is for a new police and fire building on the current site of the old post office. The 1991 budget is for final design and engineering costs. If a West Vail fire station is recommended and approved, a portion of these funds could be used for that purpose. •nwn~,i w~ia 1991 1Y91 1~J3 1994 lY9S PO,F!' 1995 IUTAL LANMNG/DESIGN 457 , 000 ACOULSTTION TTE, LANDSCAPING do TREETDEVELAPMENT 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 MPROVEMENTS ornL 457,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL •UTUREOPERATING lY`J1 1`lYL 1993 1994 1 1'J'l~ 1V1AL PRlvn„f OSTS RATING AMOK DEPARTMENT EW PERSONNEL PROJECTS ONLY ED (FTE) PERSONNEL ~.va ~ ~ PERATING SERVICES SUPPLIES TEAL OUTLAYS OTAL AMVIVU ALL ~~g ~ TOWN PR OM P~T ESSs~~''.-~ ~ OMMEN'~,AND.iUSTiFIC ON ~ - SUBMITT'EDBY: '1"'~ DATE August 6. 1990 TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPAR'IMENII ~IVLSION, Police nwu. i i i TIE: RQTECf STARTING DATE: 6-1- 9 0 Municipal Complex Redevelopment ~ROJEC.TOOMPLETIONDATE: 1993 ROIECT DESCRIPTION AND LACATION Provide temporary housing for police department and other town offices as needed. UND u AND TITLE: •xwt~ i i ~ 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 P()~995 l U l AL LANNlNG/DESIGN ACOUISTTION TTE, LANDSCAPING Qt TREET DEVELAPMENT 4, 000 4 , 000 MPROVEMEN'!S ornL 4,000 4,000 RO.IECT FUNDING OTAL •UTUREOPERATING lY`J1 lvvt 1993 199d 19v~ iu~tw PRIORITY OSTS RATING AMON DEPARTMENT EW PERSONNEL PRO.IF.CI'S ONLY ED (FIE) PERSOxNELt..,a,a 2,100 4,200 4,200 10,500 PERATING SERVICES • SUPPLIES 600 1, 200 1, 200 ~ . 00~ ITALOUTLAYS 11,600 7,200 7,200 26,000 oTAL 14,300 12,600 12,600 ~ 39,500 Anavrv~ Au. U•I•I~E ~ TOWN PR nM RO.TEC'~' ~r OMMENTS AND 7U5TIFICATIOIV~ The 1991 costs assume a six month use that includes one time set-up cost, one time furnishing cost, and one time site improvement costs. ~ f r SUBMI , , cu BY: ~ , ~ _ / ~ DATE S ~ ~~14 U ~V TOMN Of VAII - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: PRQTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND • AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS ~ 1991 1992 1993 199+ 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING b STREET 30000 30000 30000 30000 30000 150000 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE b PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 30000 30000 30000 30000 30000 150000 ~ PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 30000 30000 30000 30000 30000 150000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 199, 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED IFTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES r) CAPITAL OUTLAYS J TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION » mss CONTINUES CURRENT FIVE-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: r TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EPARTMEN7~ ~I VISION Administrative Services ROJECT ? i i LC: ROJEC'T STARTING DATE: Dobson Arena Flooring ~ROJECTOOMPLETIONDATE: ROJECTDESCRIPTIONANDLOCATION ~ per Vail Town Council agreement with the VNIlZD, the Town will pay $15,000 in 1990 and 1991 for replacement of flooring material to cover the ice surface. UND N AND TITLE: ttv.~tA- ~ w~ ~ a 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 P(1~ST 1995 l U l AL LANNING/DESIGN AOQUISI770N ITE, LANDSCAPING do TREET DEVELOPMENT MPROVEMENTS Flooring Surface $15,000 oTAL $15,000 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL UTUREOPERATING IY`J1 19y1 1993 1994 1995 IUTAL PRIORITY OSTS RATING AMONG DEPARTMENT W pERSONNEI. PROJECTS ONLY ED (Fl'E) PERSONNEL wa i ~ PERATING SERVICES SUPPLIES APITAL OUTLAYS OTAL AMVIVI~ ALL ~E REVENL>E TOWN PROD EsS~. f.~ /g OMMENTS AND JUSTTFICATIONI SUBMi i ~ nu BY: DATE: TOWN OF VAII - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DIVISION PROJECT TITLE: BUS SHELTER REPLACEMENT PROJEt'T STARTING DATE: AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PRQTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION , REPLACE 3 EXISTING AND INSTALL 3 NEM BUS SHELTERS EACH YEAR (f10,000 EA. 1. FUND N AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING d STREET DEVELOPMENTS d IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE d PLANT 0 40000 40000 40000 40000 160000 DEVEEOPMENTS d IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 0 40000 40000 40000 40000 160000 PROJECT FUNDING T01AL - 10 0 40000 40000 40000 40000 160000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERV~CES d SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL i TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION . ~ EXISTING SHELTERS WERE PURCHASED WITH A FEDERAL UMTA GRANT IN 1980. E S S THEY ARE IN NEED OF REPLACEMENT AND WE RECEIVE NUMEROUS REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL SHELTERS. REPLACEMENTS POSTPONED FOR 1991. ( 9 SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: TOMN OF VAIL - ..•.~r„oE0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRQ7ECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FORD PARK SIOEMALK IMPROVEMENTS PRQIECT COMPCETTION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION IMPROVEMENT OF SIOEMALK FROM VTRC TO FORD PARK ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD FUND • ANO 1ITLE: !0 - SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT - 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 15000 15000 LANG ACQUISITION S[TE. LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 100000 100000 DEVELOPMENTS 8 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 115000 115000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 115000 115000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TOTAL PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATINGS AMONG ~ DEPARTMENT All PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALl / ~i TOMN PROJECTS D~S~ra~~ i COMMENTS 6 JUSTIFICATION AS AN ADDITIONAL PRQTECT TO THE FORD PARK FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, I A SIDEMALK FROM VTRC TO FORD PARK COULD BE PROVIDED FOR SAFETY CONCERNS. SUBMIT7E0 BY: ~ STAN BERRYMAN DATE: TOMN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION DUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT 3TARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PULIS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACE FULLS BRIDGE AT VAIL VALLEY DRIVE FUND • AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 15000 15000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING d STREET 260000 260000 DEVELOPMENTS d IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE d PLANT DEVELOPMENTS d IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL !0 275000 275000 PROJECT FUNDING 1 TOIIN OF YAIL CAPITAL 275000 CDOH FUNDS TOTAL 10 275000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES d SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS //es ~ COMMENTS AND JU5TIFICATION BRIDGE IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR r,RANT ASSISTANCE 8UT REQUIRES MIOENING AS A MAJOR COLLECTOR AND BUS ROUTE. SUBMITTED 8Y: GREG HALL DATE: TONN OF PAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC NORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: FUND fl AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 75000 75000 75000 75000 75000 375000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 500000 500000 500000 500000 500000 2500000 1 DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVEMENTS APPROX. APPROX. APPROX. APPROX. APPROX. APPROX. BUILDING. STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVLEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 575000 575000 575000 575000 575000 2875000 PRQ7ECT FUNDING TOTAL - 10 575000 575000 575000 575000 575000 2875000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEN PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES ' CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL -10 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ~yy~~ / TONN PROJECTS (/03 ir4b ~ COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION THE TONN'S MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN HILL GENERATE NUMEROUS PROJECTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED. SOME OF THESE PROJECTS MAY INCLUDE A DELIVERY ALLEYNAY-PARK ON MILL CREEK. FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (SIOENALKS 6 MEDIANS) ANO INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS. SOME OF THESE PROJECTS MAY INVOLVE OFFSETTING FUNDING SUCH AS S.I.O.. COON OR LOCAL MATCHES FROM PRIVATE BUSINESSES ASSOCIATED NITH PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT. THE EXACT IMPROVEMENTS KITH ESTIMATED COSTS NILL 8E DETERMINED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE MASTER PLAN. SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN GATE: ~ . y.pe/w~M11yi11 ~ /a4 TOMN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT 31ARTING GATE: PROJECT TITLE: STREET FURNITURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COMPLETION DA7E: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ADDITIONS AND REPLACEMENTS TO PARK BENCHES, BIKE RACKS AND BENCNES FUND f AND TITLE: 10 PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACCUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 100000 DEVELOPMENTS 3 l~~~n~+IEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVLEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 10 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 100000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 100000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1OTAL PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATIN09 AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL -10 Y FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOMN PROJECTS ~'-°S'I" C COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION ADO 6 REPLACE ANNUALLY: S BENCHES AT =1250 EA. S PICNIC BENCHES AT !1500 EA. 7 BIKE RACKS AT 1900 EA. ' SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: TOWN OF VAIL -PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT cr'Hn r MENT~ DIVISION Administrative Services ROJECT TITLE: ~ROJF.Cf STARTING DATE: Golf Maintenance Parcel RQTECI'COMPLETTONDATE: ROJECIDFSCRIPTIONANDL.OCATION ! Continued debt service on the purchase of the Forest Service Parcel where the golf course maintenance facility is located. The process for purchas ng this parcel was begun in 1990. The final price has not yet been determined. -UND #i AND TITLE: , rcwc~,rw~.o 1991 1 1 199 PQST1945 IUTAL LANNING/DISIGN AaxnsinoN $94,000 $94,000 ITE, LANDSCAPING & TREET DEVELAPMENT MPROVEMF.N75 °T~- $94,000 $94,000 ROJECT FUNDING OTAL 1 _L IYYl 1993 1994 1 lam- PRIORI7~Y IJ'TURE OPERATING RATING AMONG STS DEPARTMENT PROJECT'S ONLY EW PERSONNEL ru (F'I'E) PERSONNEL wJ r, PERATING SERVICES SUPPLJE5 APITAL OUTIAYS OTAL _ ' ~ AMUN~ ALL TOWN PRQI LI'I'tJRE REVENUE l~F T i Z OMMENI:SANDJUSTIFICATION, The estimated cost for this parcel is $250,000. We have assumed a three year lease purchase of the property with annual payments of $94,000. SUBMITTED BY: DATE: . . TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING GATE: PROJECT TITLE: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIALS. IRRIGATION. SEEDINti. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SITE FEATURES AS SHOWN IN 1989 L.I.P. MASTER PLAN DOCUMENT FUND f AND TITLE: 30-RETT POST PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 15000 13000 34000 0 0 22000 84000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING ~ STREET 157000 130000 90000 124000 124000 206000 831000 DEVELOPMENTS IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II C1 C1 C1 C1 REMAINDER A1.A2 SURVEY-BASE MAPS 0 4000 4000 0 0 13000 21000 TOTAL - 30 172000 147000 128000 124000 124000 241000 936000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 172000 147000 128000 124000 124000 241000 936000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS POST 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION IMPLEMENTS 1989 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PRIMARILY) T T SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENHEIMER DATE: „ a.,.:~,.M,p~1p TONN OF VAII - PROPO''ED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO1ECi DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC MOKRS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE PARKS PROTECT TITLE: SKI MUSEUM POCKET PARK PROTECT COMPLETION DATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND IOCNTION E. MEADOM DRIVE AND VAII ROAD DEMOLITION OF EKISTING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF PARK FUND N AND TITLE: 30 - RETT PROTECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 2000 2000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 25000 25000 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 RETT 27000 27000 PROTECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 RETT 27000 27000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROTECTS ONLY i OPERATING SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 RETT FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL S TOMN PROJECTS ~ ~ COMMENTS R JUSTIFICATION PROJECT INCLUDES DEMO OF EXISTING BUILDING, REGRADING, INSTALLATION OF IRRIr,ATtON SYSTEM, SOO AND FIANT MATERIALS; RESTROOMS, SITE FURNISHINGS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ~ NOT INCLUDED. SUBMITTED 8Y: TODD ODPENNEIMER GATE: TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: GORE CREEK PROMENADE PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION SEE ATTACHMENT FUND !f AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 4000 4000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE. LANDSCAPING d, STREET 70000 70000 DEVELOPMENTS I4 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVEEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 74000 74000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 74000 74000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FIE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES S SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ~ E / / TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION INCLUDES GRADING, NEW IRRIGATION, LANDSCAPING. LIGHTS, COMPLETE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WITH. BRICK PAYER REPAIR SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENHEIMER DATE: _ GORE CREEK PROMENADE 1991 Planning/Design $ 4,000 Grading $ 12,000 Irrigated Turf $ 17,500 Trees $ 5,000 Park Lights $ 13,500 Drainage $ 6,000 Brick Repair $ 10,000 Contingency S 6.000 Total $ 74,000 TOWN OF PAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STEVEN'S PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION WEST VAIL - KINNICKINNICK AND SWTH FRONTAGE ROAD - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SEE ATTACHMENT FUND 7! AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 26000 10000 36000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING b STREET 125000 135000 260000 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING. STRUCTURE ~ PLANT DEVLEOPMENTS i IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 151000 145000 296000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 151000 145000 296000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (,FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES 6 SUPPLIES CAPITAL WTLAYS TOTAL - 30 ' FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION INCLUDES ALL IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTED BY NEIGHBORHOOD ~ E T T CONSISTENT WITH OTHER TOWN PARK IMPROVEMENTS 2: SUBMITTED BY:~ TODD OPPENHEIMER DATE: • • F T V ' P ~ STEVEN~S PARK IMPROVEMENTS X991 Planning/Design $ 26,000 Grading $ 11,000 Playground Equipment $ 40,000 Irrigated Turf $ 55,000 Contingency S ~.ooo Total $ 151,000 X992 Footbridge $ 27,000 Cabin Renovation $ 20,000 Nature Trail $ 3,000 Park Lights $ 9,900 Trees $ 7,500 Volleyball Court $ 4,000 Furnishings $ 8,600 Parking $ 11,000 Construction of new restroom S 54.000 Total $ 145,000 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN RECREATION TRAILS MASTER PLAN/FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 100K AT THE NEED AND POSSIBILITY OF PROVIDING OFF STREET TRAILS BETWEEN THE VAIL GOLF COURSE ANO LIONSHEAD. FUND # AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN 60000 60000 lANO AC®UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 60000 60000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 60000 60000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES & SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL /~/C T T TOWN PROJECTS /1 COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION THIS STUDY WILL 100K AT THE NEED, JUSTIFICATION AND FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING A SYSTEM OF OFF STREET RECREATION TRAILS TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE VAIL GOLF COURSE ANO LIONSHEAD WHICH WILL TIE THE OTHER TRAIL SYSTEMS TOGETHER. IT WILL LOOK AT THE NEEDS OF ALL USERS AND DETERMINE THE BEST APPROACH AT MEETING THE MANY DIFFERENT NEED RE9UIREMENTS. THE RESULTS OF THE TRANSPORATAION OUESTIONAIRE IN THE CITIZEN SURVEY STATED THIS AS BEING A VERY HIGH PRIORITY. SUBMITTED BY: r,REG HALL DATE: TOWN Of VAiI - Pn~~~~EO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PARKS PROJECT 1ITLE: PROJECT STARTING GATE OONOVAN PARK REVfOETATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION FUND • AND TITLE: - 30 RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 TOTAL PLANNING/OESIr,N LANG ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING 1< STREET 7000 7000 DEVELOPMENTS b IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 RETT 7000 7000 PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 RETT 7000 .000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATiNr;S AMONG DEPARTMENT ALl PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 RETT FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALl T TOWN PROJECTS ~ E T COMMENTS !4 JUSTIFICATION PROJECT INCLUDES SCANIFICATION AND RESEEDING OF DISTURBED AREAS AT DONOVAN PARK. SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENNEIMER DATE: ' •*OWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT .i' DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DIVISION y PROJECT TITLE: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT STARTINti DATE: PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 6' CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 1.000 LINEAR FEET OF SIDEWALK IN VARIOUS AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REC TRAILS PLAN, VAIL VILLAGE MASTER PLAN, URBAN DESIGN GUIDE PLAN AND SPECIAL COUNCIL REQUESTS. FUND li AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION 51TE. LANDSCAPING 6 STREET 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE R PLANT DEVLEOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 i PRQTECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL PRIORITY NEW PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTEI RATINGS AMONG DEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY OPERATING SERVICES b SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION rj' F_ T 7- 9 SUBMITTED BY: STAN BERRYMAN DATE: TOMN OF VAiL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT OiVISION PUBLIC MORKS/TRANSPORTATION PRQTECT STARTING GATE: PROJECT TITLE: DOMO JUNCTION BIKE PATH PROJECT COMPLETION DAZE: PROJECT DESCRTPTION AND LOCATION BIKE PATH FROM THE END OF THE S. FRONTAGE ROAD IN INTERMOUNTAIN TO US. 21-6 ALONG GORE CREEK. FUND • AND TITLE: 30-RETT POSSIBLE STATE RECREATION FUNDS PROJECT COSTS 1991 PLANNING/DESIGN X7500 LANG ACQUISITION ? POSSIBLE SITE, LANOSCADING d STREET 250000 DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BU[LDTNG, STRUCTURE 6 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL - 30 297500 ' PROJECT FUNDING TOTAL - 30 275000 FUTURE OPERATING COSTS 1991 PRIORITY NEM PERSONNEL NEEDED (FTE) RATINGS AMONG OEPARTMENT ALL PERSONNEL COSTS PROJECTS ONLY i OPERATING SERVICES d SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAYS TOTAL - 30 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ~ r ~,T / O TOMN PROJECTS C COMMENTS ANO JUSTIFICATION CONNECT A BIKE PATH FROM END OF SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD TO US 21-6 THROUGH OOMD CANYOOES GRAOINO. PAVING RETAINING STRUCTURES d MAJOR BRIDGE CROSSING. THE FIRST PHASE MOULD TRY TO GU TO GORE CREEK d T1E INTO THE INTERSTATE. THE SECOND PHASE MOULD DEAL MITH THE CROSSING OF THE RAILROAD AND EAGLE RIVER. THE STAFF MILL APPRSTATE OUTDOOR RECREATION FOR A GRANT AND ALSO APPROACH COON AND OTHER ENTITIES FOR POSSIBLE FUNOTN(1. SUBMIiiED BY: GREG HALL . ~.::~~i • ~ t , l ~ JJ~~'~~ '•ti' I ' Vail's Greatest - ~ Netuspaper Since 1965 ' I . py,lip, 4 ~ ~,s•"'~ 4 t 24, No. 4U Vail, Colorado -Week of August 3 - 9, 1990 Twenty-Five Cents 2 ~ ]au Traa -August 3.1990 - 1n1~ n • " • _ .o r .Parkin oli is a st ~~~~~•'~~~~~s~~{~~ ~ ' ~:zn~~the.•~rz ht direction We applaud the Town of Vail for its new parking policy. We expect to may take 10 or 15 minutes longer, but with the parkingryst a wee bit more hear the policy criticized, loudly and persistently. It took a certain amount _ . ~••r=~sive at the Village Parking Structure, there is more incentive to use of courage for town staffers to submit what is certain to be a very unpopulaz the buses. - • • if modest increase in parking rates. Yes, the-bus shuttle gets a huge subsidy from the town -more than $2 Make no mistake, convenience of parking has been subsidized, and million per year. It won't get any better. The subsidy to the parking heavily so. The expansion of the Village Parking Structure this year is ~ structures is currently running at about $2.2 million, but in nine more years costing nearly $10 million. Not all of that money is going to parking, of_r.:•.the debts will be paid, and town officials say that the life expectancy of course -there is a visitors' center, a refurbished transportation center, and . the parking garages is 30 to 40 more years. Viewed from that perspective, it space for the Colorado Ski Museum. The parking cost, though, is calculated could be argued, that we.ahould.spend more on parking spaces and less for at $1],500 per parking space. To allow people to park there all day for ~ -buses. ~ ' .y~.z;'' ' - _ $].33 -which is what the parking coupons allowed us to do last winter-:" ~ That could be argued, but ~ it's 'a lame argument. A~, bus shuttle is makes absolutely no sense. Where else in Vail can you find rent so cheap? ~ -imperative in Vail.. Without an extensive bus shuttle, we would be All manner of things in •this valley could warrant similarly: huge expanding the parking structures constantly. The four-way intersection subsidies, making life in Vail even more fun, and stimulating the valley's ;;::would become more than a men: annoyance. Driving to Vail•V_ illage would . economy at the same time. A convention center iomea ,to.mind ~ for $10 a' L •:..e . , :exasperating for everyone during peak seasons. million, we could have a very good one. A performing arts center?,A gallery ~~`:".The Blue Pass r. „r.;.~ed by the town staff is still a good deal - $1.34 per and museum?The list could goon and on. . day at L.ionsHead Mall. fiven if used ~ only every third day, that's still a We cannot continue to fritter away our money, $10 million here and $10 •~'modest costa And it.,will still be possible to park at the Village Parking million there, on building parking.stalls. There are better answersin mass:=},;' Structure after 3 p.m. at minimal cost. The policy merely reflects the high transit, and we already have a very good alternative in the bus., system."e?;~demand for parking at. Vail Village during day hours::` ; ~ - . Although heavily used in the Vail Village-LionsHead Mall loop,'outlying;*?•:.It's a'good policy, a~easonable policy, a policy that is overdue. It takes a circuits often have oodles of vacant seats. The town's new parking•policy;,-. long sMde toward electing the mats of parking convenience. We support should encourage people to use that already good bus system Using the bus it = AB~• _ ::~°ti ; . ~~i~` I • Veil's Greatest _ ,~i ~Y ~ Newspaper Since 1965 ' I y,~ • ~l. 24, No. 4U ,Vail, Colorado -Week of August 3 - 9, 1990 Twenty-Five Cents ' .M+..'~.. :i M'... ;~Parkirig~fees'are~'likelyao take a BikeWW~_nezt° s.i~~y~gnter ~r By TARA I?I.ANAGAN If ail goes as planned by the fir' • ~ ° ".:'-s".~~.' ' Town of Vail, parking ie going'. ss,7~t:..~ ;,:-s~ira , to get more ,r .slue and lase ~ ~:,;-E='There is no free ' convenient for locals this wine' ' ,;~:•~r =~:~:'•v;: ter. Out-of-townera who park` ~o.'.lUIIC~I. r~,. their care,for more then five ,•.~:.>::r :•t= :''-Tom Steinber ~ " hours at a stretch will feel the 7 n:; i:+a: ; ~ • g change 'as well, and anyone. .~"r~T~••~• ~ ~ ' who buys a Gold Pass will cer•' . " tainly notice the new prlcetag: ~ :period,' expect' to 'pay more The Vail Town' Council on' than twice ae much as you did Tuesday reviewed sparking- lest year. Fees Tor 18 to 24' policy for the 1990-91' ski hours of parking will be $lb, season, which will be ,..:.:,:..,tad whereas they were $71ast wa- in s public hearing next:' eon. • • " Tuesday evening. The three- Last year.it cost $b to park - pronged proposal eliminates for six hours, $6 for seven to 12 the town s ott-abused parking hours. Next winter the price coupon system and replaces it will be E6 for five to seven with the eo-called Blue Pase,' hours; $7 for seven to nine; $8 which coats $200 for the aki~ for nine to 11 hours; $9 for 11 aeon. The pass moat likely ~ to 13; and $12 for 13 to 18. be available for =70 per A Vail parking study shows ..gird season. ~ ~ ~ that out of 2,000 parked care, Blue Paso holders will not be' 160 stayed. for more than five able to park at the Village hours: Thirty percent of the Parking Structure until 3 p.m:~ ; transactions were registered at Last year, coupon users and -lees than 90 minutes. The pro- Blue Paee "holders " Were poeal . ~ ......mends that the 90- ' allowed to use 'the Village minute period remain free, as ' Parking Shvcture". on' week: to allow locals to run errands, days through moat of the ski and to lessen the tendency for Beason. This year, however, the people to park illegally. town wants to steef locale The -plan • received Iittle away from the village strut= •resietance from the council, tore, which :,,r,.:.:... to be the' with the exception of Rob preferred parking spot among LsVine. Hs said LioneHead visitors. ~ Mall business could sutler if To help accommodate pave the village structure became holders, Ford Park'B parking primarily a visitor lot and the area may be converted into a L onaHead lot became mainly lot for Blue Paso holders only. an employee and locale lot. • People with passes would alw 'Mayor I{ent Rose, however, have unlimited : parking'' at .celled the Blue Pass "a heck of LioneHead. ~ ' " " " ' a deal," and challenged locale There's more: The lesson to find a similar discount any- Go]d Paso, which sold for $476 where ales in Vail. Rose added " last year, will coat =760, and that' parking probably won't will be limited to 1b0 buyers: get any cheaper as time goes Gold Pase holders are guar:. by. anteed parking at any time at "1'he only way it's going to ' the LioneHead and Village go from now is up," he said. parking structures. ' ' ' ~ Councilman Tom Steinberg And one more thing: If you mentioned the possibility of don t have a .pass and plan on starting to charge patrons for parting 'your 'car" at either the Bret 90 minutes of parking, " structure for more than live but his cohorts declined to sup-' hours, expect to pay a little port the notion. ~ ' " more than you are aocuetomed: "There is no free lunch," he For instance, if you leave your said. "Somebody's got to pay ear for an entire ° 24-hour far it."" • " ~ • r • : • .k~.• !I~C~W ~i•, J~~~~i~a~~- ~ -ira.~~~ t W.i .i~.. i'R.1•',`JhS~I '.IF.fl~9 - . a'~g., < et ~ yS~v.l9.: '•RCt;,t:; _t ~ ..9~ '`y-zA~~; K~?'!x.~^fi.? n%~ Serving Enyle County • Tuesday through Sunday ' Volume X, Number 137 - . ~ ti. e=... ice: ~ .f K ~~~Vail.budget offic~r~de_fends ~~proposed~~•parking~Fprice~liike~ By Scott Taylor • . percent of the town's annual Structure and Ford Pazk. Ford Park - mry s~rtwri~ ~ budget Combined with Vail's frce ' = free parking last'season - `bus system -which costs the town would become 'blue-pass parking Parking fees need to increase W about $2 million annually'- the' only. ~'::•1 kcep Vail's head above water, a town use`s about 20 percent of its Gold parking passes would in- .town official said Friday. ~ annual. budget on parking and crease in price from $475 last Vail Budget O[ficer Steve Bar- trahSportation matters, Barwick season to $750 this season. Gold- wick said the drain on the town's ; laid. pass holders would be able park in " ' budget from Vail's parking swc= Most of that money is sales-tax any lot they chose and would be ! lures justifies increased parking revenues, Barwick said. ' ' ' guaranteed a space. rates. 'There's only so much you can The plan also increases hotvly Barwick said the town pays spend in the way of sales tax," parking rates in each swcture. about $3.4 million each year to Barwick said. "Other solutions These increases will add another' ' own and operate both the Village need to be found. One is parking $150,000 in parking revenues, ' and Lionshcad parking structures revenues." Barwick said. but receives only about S1 million The Town Council will decide ; in revenue. Tuesday evening on a plan that 'The town's subsidy will stay at "I think this makes a solid case would increase those revenues. about 52.4 million," Barwick said. for the need for more parking The town would eliminate last "If we don't increase parking revenue;' Barwick said. "People season's parking coupons. The revenues, that subsidy will have to don't understand how expensive sown would sell blue passes - increase." operating a parking system is. $200 for the entire season and $70 Barwick said the cost of the " "If this were a private business, for onc•titIrd. The $70 blue passes swctures may go down as the town parking prices would probably would replace the $40 coupons, ac- pays them o[f. triple. Who in private business is cording to the plan. ' going to subsidize one-third of the Blue-pass holders would not be "Maybe in 10 years, that`ll drop parking operation?" allowed in the Village Parking off," Barwick said. 'Then again, The town pays about $2.4 mil- Swcture until 3 p.m. Instead, they the town may have more debt 10 lion annually, he said, about 10 would be directed to the Lionshead pay oCL" Town of Vai! ready to redeem its parking incentive coupons By Scoll Taylor SU tickets can be exchanged fora :gold passes from $475 last season rwysurtw~~ $50 discount and 75 tickets fora . to $750 this season. Gold-pass hot- $100 discount. Only one, ticket per ~ tiers would be able to park in either Vail's parking incentive ,,.,,b.~m day will be accepted by the town, parking Swcture .anytime and will transfer to this winter's parking Thompson said. would be able to come and go es. , program, Vail officials said Friday. Those who collect 50 rickets will ~ many times as they wanted. Vail Finance Controller Steve also be entered in a Nov. 6 drawing Blue passes would cost $200 for Thompson said the Wwn will be for gill certificates from Eagle Val- the whole season or $70 for one- rcady to accept the incentive Icy Music, Bart and,Yeti's and the third of Ule season arld would be coupons Tuesday. - ~ Chcese Shop. Those .who collect 75 g~ in the Lionshead Swcture The far-right ticket machine in tickets wiU have (heir names en- and Ford Park lot any lime and the the Lionshcad Parking ~ Swcture :tend in 'a drawing dor a ;Vail As-~ ~Villagt::sn~tctttreafte{3.p.m._~.~. kls been tamed on since July 1. sociatcs merchant ski pass. ' ~ ~ Locals can collect the tickets and The' discounts' will be-good Thompson said tite town will ice- ' rum them in W the Vail Finance toward all winter parking passes, sue S25 credit vouchers for the Department in exchange for dis- according to Vail Public Informs- parking irtcenlive coupons. The counts on winter parking. ` lion Officer Caroline Fisher.-g:r-~.~-;:town will also issue 530 credit 25 tickets will be good fore $25. •'A plan currcndy before the 7bWn ~?'~vouchers if a ttses a 5100 discount on winter parking passes. Council would ittctease the price, of credit to ptuchase a S70 blue pass. ' ' ~~....M.....w.. . . r• ~ ;~E i~H~~ ~eA .1 •rr;M434~4^~'%. •'~a:~~ij :b:. :'r.l~',M'.Ll~~.th )Vy ' • ~ . . . . ~"¢.4, .Vile.. .fig a<~:...1:4. '4' P~RyQ.ii'l::t ~~,po (A+~,' _,~i:;`1er Sensing Engle Count f,L"' 1~ _ , r Tuesday through Sunday - ~ ,f ~ Volume X, Number 137 i~ ' ~ .7r. i Pepe 3a -Yap Dally Saturday, August 4, tt190 ' ~ n ~ o..n . ~ : . Editors Note Beginning today, the Vail Daily will publish I I .regular editorial opntlons.On issues impokant to readers. II No parking Locals aie being asked to buy the mansion, but to live in the servants' quarters. Vail's r..:.r;..+ed winter-parking plan will drive locals and' workers away from the village this'ski season. The plan ezhibifs a lack of political understanding of the community. Locals could park in the Village Parking Structure if they, wanted.to pop for a3750gold -parking pass, pay`newly , increased hourly ratesbr come to work after;3 p.m, daily. The 5200 blue passes will grant the bearer the privilege of trudging'' ' to work through the mud and slush'from Lionshead or Ford Park. The town begged our indulgence during Village Structure renovation. Village businesses have taken a hit well below the belt this summer square in the'pocketbook with' the promise of increased parking capacity and the expectation ' that the parking chinch would be solved for at least a`couple years. Now if seems we're being asked to be patient forget a summer of ~ncorivenience-and file quietly into expensive slots 'out in the boonics. Plain and simple, that would be a huge breach of the public trust. Yes the town probably needs to increase prices. Vail's latest,addruon fo the Village Structure-cost 510.4 million 5800.000 more than first estimated. That money has to come ' from'somewhett, and charging the user makes sense: Parking is a scarce commodity in Vail. With the addition to the Village Sttvcluic, the town has 2,700 spaces. Stack that alongside an average of 10,000 skiers per day and several ' thou and outlying and down-valley employees. The problem is obvious. . Visitor parking is top priority. Guests tend to'ge[ cranky if they,have to drive around trying to find a parking spot. Cranky: guests may noCcotrie back next year. But locals also tend to Set cranky if they have to drive around for hours frying to find a spot; a cranky warier makes a deeper, morc'lasung impression on a guest than the lack.tif a parking slot. Most employees don't have the wherewithal to dmp 3200 Cora parking pass when they first pull into town. With rent, a damage deposit and a ski pass, some may have trouble scraping up 370 for a parking pass to get them through the first " one-third of the §cason. , . ":The Town Council will almost surely come face to face with a iooinful of angry`people Tuesday night when it fortnally tevtews the parking plan. Without ignificant co~essions to the:' pubhe.mood, we face a long, cold winter. Vail's status as the number one ski area in America'dcpends oncustomcr service. ' Unless the town'can keep the servants happy, however, customer servtce`wiLl goalie way of the dodo bird and the 3101ift ticket: ° ' r„fir - - .'_,r~ _ - - ~ :1~ c .:3~T $ ...iF.aJ -i~', ~ t~" ^'.~i'~.',lYSil',Ih, ~t9 3..1 - f. r I + 'rI' t• wlt:,t;~. tat Z' n. ~ ht:: ~~5; ~FI.~ w~ 1` . Serving Errt~?e County - . r: -j~ ~ , Tuesday through Sunday ,Y•" t Volume X, Number 137 Merchants: Parking plan~.won't cut the mustard By Stott Taylor eliminate Bail - kin wu ory swrw,t~ Y par g, pons.; ' Lionshcad and v111age aWCWres at • quc off at the guest." of Snug in Utc Village, said the plan - Instead, locals would be en- any Ume. ' Friedman said he also opposes could hurt her efforts to bring in Vail's new winter-parking plan couraged to purchase blue parkingg~ Both blue and pnld Doss holders ` the plan for the effect it could have winter employees. will have a ripple effect on the vat- passes - goo~'ncrilhGr the entire~vould be allowed to pome ana qu on Lionshead business. Friedman "Most of the employees don't ley economy -and probably mak ski season or one-third of the as many Gmes 85 they want, a said he and the merchants assoc:ia- want Io incur the expense of park- employces surly, local merchant season, tsme passes wows cost. benefit last season's partung Gon are drafting a letter W the ing" Broy said. "lf they have to said Thursday. .e~w ror the entve season or S70 coupons did not offer. ~ Town Cowcil opposing the plan. pay, they're not going to work The Town Council is scheduled [or one-third of the season. Merchants in .the :.village and : . "If all the employees park _ here, here." to make a final,Qecision on the plan Blue-pass holders would not be Lionshead said ~ they oppose llte . it'll drive the paying customers and Ghiqui Hoffman, manager of the at a '1:30 p.m.:~pttblic meeting allowed W park in the Village Park- plan, ; , guests there," Friedman said. Rucksack, said guests will suffer. Tuesday. ll ing Structure until 3 p.m. Instead, Ken Friedman, manager at Char- : ~~ar Ltd. owner Steve ' ~ "'If .the Village is so important, Cyrano's owner Dave Dowell they would be dviceted to the lie's Gondola Ski' • Shop in ; Stockmar agreed. who's going to provide the services said business owners will have W ~Lionshead Parking Swcture and Lionshead and president of the ~ "(.don't see why •the village is here?" she said. "Wc have a lot o[ increase employce wages to help Ford Park. Parking al Ford would Lionshead Merchants Association, ~ any better than Lionshead;' Stock- guests. Who is going to cater to them pay for parking passes. Those no longer be free; gates and com- • said the new plan could create rear said. "I don't have a problem them?" costs, in tum, will be passed on W puters would be installed at the grumpy employees in the Village. ;with increasing parking revenues. I Hoffman said the Eagle County customers, he said. entrance. Free narking would be "When you're' running late; you . do have a real problem with a and Vail bus systems are not the "A sandwich will be a IitUe mo~available~ hoy°ver• at the Vail Golf park your car acid then wait fot the number of spaces in Lionshead answer. Employees who depend on expensive;' Dowell said. "fhe ~otuse Clubhouse and the soccer bus," Friedman said..•'"Ihe~com- being chewed up. the bus system often make it tc business ownetS won't pay it: field on Vail Valley Drive. bination of running and~•waiting ~ "1 like the locals, but you know work late, and that ~•means angry. "Ultimately, the guy that suffers The proposal would also increase ,makes the stress.'load oni the ,the guests are the ones that are ,customers, - is the one who makes $6 an hour." the price for gold parking passes employee huge. We're' under 'going to spend the money." r~~.~ ^MWe' have employees as .[ar out The plan, presented to the Vail from $475 W $750. The gold pass enough stress in ski season anyway, ' 'The plan is just es unpopular in ' Town Council on Tuesday, would would be valid at both the and i Ihink the employee could tor- the village. Laurel Broy, manager t~le~u a« Pantin~prasr raa~ s ~ BULK RATE . U.S. POSTAGE . ~ - PAI D va4 co erase Serving E6gle County P„mn ~ n Tuesday through Sunday Volume X, Number 139 August 5, 1990 Vail• parking •could be: as~~expen~siue~~as~~in~~.NYC - 5',C'~ rie+.... Avera a Dail Parkin Rates . i~=~ R•eVam~ped-.plan would 9 Y. 9 _ bose~d on 8-10 hours per doy~ r• , raise hourly rates Va I I (proposed) p Q Q Q Q ~ Q 0~' Q 0~ By SCOIt Taylor Would cost 512. The rates would ' o~y s~ttw~~ top out at $15 for 24 hours of park- New York~.~~~~~.~~ ing. O O O O 0 .O 9 _Q O O O O 0 .O O :r ' Vail's hourly parking rates would 24 hours of parking cost $7 last be at least as expensive as season. D e n V e r ~ ~ ~ downtown New York Cit 's and Accorain to the New York City O O O O :O O O .O O O y g more ratpcnsive then Downtown Visitors and Convention Bureau, Aspen ~ ~ ~ Iknvcr and other Colorado ski parking rates average 57.50 for 10 areas, if a rate. increase gets council hottrs of parking in the downtown Breckenridge -FREE- approval. ' ' area loll. Rates vary. depending on Vail town officials said Friday distance from Fifth Avenue. The Copper Mountain -FREE- ~ Uteir hourly ra ~e high because closer w Fifth Avenue the higher of a lack o[ c land and off- 'the rates - S8 to $9 for 10 hours. Steamboat Springs -FREE- strcctparking. 'Rates drop Canner from Fifth Vail wotdd entirely revamp its "Avenue to a low of about $6 [or 10 • parking rate structure if the plan is .hours. approved. Hourly rates in both . - Denver Public Works Com- $1 X00 t', sttvettrres next ski"season would..~.munity Director Amy Lingg said remain the same as last season, $1 ~„parking rates in downtown private (DOes not Include parking pt:155es Oroff-street porking) , , , per 'hour for five hours, 'Parking ~ lots average about $3 to $5 per would cost $6 for seven hours grid , daily. Municipal lots cost about $1 vii apr o!•P!~ r ~ ~~a+ S7 [or nine. Eleven hotus of park• ~pcr day, Lingg said. ing would cost S8 and 13 hours . , t?Iwe ae P~rk(n would cost S9. 18 bolus of parking t P's° s Parking • ~ • . . ' From page 1 ~ :~.V,:•..: , An abundaitcd of on-street park- move away from on-street pazk- Crews direct cars to empty spaces ing makes those low rates possible, ing, according to • ;Steamboat. in a variety of loLS. Louis said those Lingg said. Springs City Manager Harvey parked a long way from dte ski area `It's simple supply and demand," Rose. The city is designing'a park- are bussed to the slopes. Lingg said. "We have about 2,400 ing swaure for 1992, he said. The Vail Public Works Director Stan on strcet spaces in the central busi- ~ reson was required to build Berryman said that is one- of the ness district and lens of thousands enough parking areas' for futtue bigger difference between Vail and on city side streets. There is a growth when it first opened. Il built other ski areas. Skiers and locals surplus of parking." two parking structures about eight 'can park right at the base of the Lingg said on-street parking ran- • years ago -about 2,500 spaces, :mountain - a convenience worth gcs from free to $1 per hour. Most .Rose said. Both were tamed over w 'paying for. ~ parking meters cost about 25 cents the town, he saidr • ~ • - "It's one of the reason's we're per hour, but Denver has special Parking is Gee in both structures, 'successful," Berryman said. "It's an "red-head" meters that cost SI per but donations arc accepted, Rase • improvement over outlying gravel hour to discourage long term park- .•said. ~ ~ parking lots. People have the ail- ing. ~ "Steamboat originate in an vantage oC being able W drive into Abundant off-street parking also agriculwral community and oC covered, paved parking right by the drives parking prices down in course the tanners were looking for slopes " Aspen: Public Works D'vector Bob abroad valley," Rose said. "Most Gish said Aspen's new parking other resorts arc in a narrow valley. Berryman also cited a lack of off structure costs about $1 per day. As a result, we have a bt of land to street parking (or higher rates. Aspen is trying to discourage be developed." j "VVe certainly don't have ~ an off-street parking, however. ' - Parking is-also ~frce in Brack- 'abundance of street available for 'Parking is a ~ huge concern," enridge and al Coppei Mtxrntain. parking," Berryman said. "We also Gish said. "It's always' a problem. Both areas have several lots a dis- ~ have'a scarcity of land for outlying Our strocts are small and we're lance from ~Utq ski area end parking lots. It's always been com- . trying to do away with cars on the downWwn arcs;.•'a`„ ~ pleii, ' street. We're trying to become more .Kevin Louis, bast crew' super- •i 'The fact that Ihcre is rio free like Vail.". visor at Copper Motinmin, said the ~ parking is a~stalcment of just how Steamboat Springs is also trying ski area optxates,all of the parking.. canplex parking has gotten here." • ~ ~ ~ ~ BLLK RATE ' ~ • ~ ~ y U.a. P09TAQE PAiD Serving Engle County varc,coeiese Tuesday through Sunday ~ P.,~„a • n " ;_s . ' Volume X, Number 139 . August 5, 1990 Public hearing on parking set for Tuesday • ' By Scott Taylor Gold ~arlung passes would also are puuing together a vansportauon ; • nry, swrw.rv~ be more expensive - S750 this master plan for the town. . season compared W 5475 last Ullcvig said Tuesday that the A contmversiat winter p9rking acason, Cold pass holders would fie plan is meant W increase the town's plan goes before the Vail Town allowed to park in either structure parking revenues and make Council Tuesday night for a public anytime and would be guaranteed a management of the system easier. hearin8• parking place. Town o[flcials said Friday That the The plan was first ,,.,,v,,.,rd W Hourly parking rafe9 would in- expense of Vait's parking structures ttre council last Iltesday. This crease, as well. Parking this winter requires increased rates. Tuesday's meeting begins at 7:30 would cost Sl per, hour for flue Only council member Rob Le- p.m, in the Vail Municipal Build- hours of parking =the same as last Vine objected to the plan Tuesday. ~8• season. Parking for a more eaten- Workers would be forced to park in ' The plan would eliminate last ded period of time would L-w,......: Lionshead, he said, fuming it into season's discount parking cwpons by about 50 tints: per hour w, a ~ employee bt. and free ,.~.1.:..g in Ford Park. ,maximum of SIS., for, 18. to 24 Locals would be able to purchase a :hours, ' Lionshead Merchants Associa- blue parking pass good tat the en-::: The first lyS houra~of parking in lion otflcials said they were send- tire season for 5200 or orwthird of : ; both the • Village ` iird ; Lionshead ing a letter to the town council ob- ' ' the season for 570. Blue pass hot- : ` ~cumes would be 6ee.`: , ' jetting to tht plan for the same dens would be able to park in tha The plan was= assembled ~ by reason. Visitors -the bulk ~ win- Lionshead Struture and Ford Park Van's Parking and Transportation ter business -would be forced to anytime snd the Village Parking Task Force and consultant Amie the Village Structure u Lionshead Structure after 3 p.m.; • ~ , ~ ; F ~ ; Ullevig: UUevig_ end the task force tills with employees. ~ REC'n AUG 1 4 1990 T0: Vail Town Council Members FROM: Abe Shapiro I wish to express my thoughts to you relative to the present and future zoning under "Agriculture-Open Space" and my recent "Grand- father" request. I've been a land developer for over 40 years in many communities in New Jersey, Florida and Colorado, so perhaps I know a little about the subject. I don't believe it makes any sense to prohibit or restrict property owners of land of less than 35 acres with this zoning, to 2, 000 S.F. GRFA if they have several acres with 1 or more acres of buildable land. A residence built on several acres under Agriculture Open - Space zoning, that is properly planned and designed with its permitted and accessory uses could be a compliment to Vail by its rural and mountain ambiance and appearance. Does everything in Vail have to be multi-story condos or lodges, commercial office and store buildings, parking structures, large duplexes, etc? If you don't keep some of the rural-mountain-ranch atmosphere in Vail, you'll defeat the purpose of why many people come to Vail. Vail will become like the cities people want to leave. The present restriction of 2,000 S.F. on less than 35 acres is absurd. If someone has for example 5 acres with at least 1 acre buildable, why restrict them to 2,000 S.F. GRFA, which is a home not really large enough for 2 people? What's the point? Compare this with your other codes? Control the size but not be ridiculous about it? Let the property owner build a decent home that will be a compliment to Vail. When this 2,000 S.F. GRFA zoning was passed in 1978, 2,000 S.F. GRFA may have been a reasonable GRFA for a single family home, however in 11 years just as Vail has changed, so has the GRFA needs for a single family home, which today would probably be a minimum of 3,000 S.F. GRFA. Isn't the Town promoting "caretaker" units? Then why restrict a caretaker unit on a parcel of land that may be over 5 acres with over 1 acre of buildable land? A parcel like this would pretty much require a caretaker to maintain the property and to restrict this doesn't make any sense. Control the size of the caretaker unit to 12 or 1,500 S.F. GRFA but don't restrict it. On parcels of 5 or more acres with over 1 acre of buildable land, what's wrong with a single family residence not to exceed 3,000 or 3,500 S.F. GRFA with a caretaker unit not to exceed 12 or 1,500 S.F. GRFA - is i this gong to negatively affect Vail's density in any way?? I think these thoughts should be taken into consideration when you work on your new zoning ordinances. Thank you. i i .i~' I i f _ I On another subject, I feel I have been unfairly treated by erroneous statements made by a Council member as it relates to my interests. At your July 24th meeting when Mr. EskwitYi and staff related to Council that my attorneys found that I had'~a right to build on my West Vail lot. Mr. Lapin stated ghat he had 3 lots of a similar situation to mine and that there wens many more in Vail. Mr. Lapin went on to make a resolution that no residences should be permitted on Agriculture - Open Space zoning o:f less than 35 acres which unfortunately was passed. Mr. Lapin's in:formationwas wrong, yet his erroneous statements possibly influences the; way other Council members voted. None of Mr. Lapin's lots compared to mine in any way. One of his referred to lots wasn't even in the Town of . Vail. Mr. Lapin states that there are many lots in Vail'~like mine? Wrong main. In researching the Vail zoning m:~.ps I could not find a single lot that compares to mine which has the following characteristics: I 1) Are they zoned Agriculture - Open Space? 2) Do they have 6.844 acres or near it? 3) Do they have 1.39 acres buildable land oz' near it? 4) Are they contiguous on 2 sides with USFS or BI,M or Colorado State Land? (Mine borders USFS land for thousands of acres on 2 sides.) 5) Are they near other homes or homes that can be built? (Mine is hundreds of feet from any home or home that can built.) I Again at the August Council work session, the same type erroneous statements were made by Mr. Lapin including comparing mY lot with Condo - Upen Space lots. This is like comparing apples with peanuts, yet 1 believe these erroneous statements! may have influenced the thinking of other Council membE~rs as it ;related to mry request for Grandfathering the zoning on my lot. At the August 7th meeting, Mr. Lapin disqualified himself as a Council member because he stated he had a conflict ofi interest. Why then was he permitted to attend the executive session to give his views if he had a conflict of interest? Is this proper protocol? Is this fair to me who wasn't <~.ble to protect my interests at the executive session? Mr. Rose disqualified himself because of a conflict of interest .and properly did not ~iattend the i executive session. i I believe I have a fair and legitimate right to be Grandfathered on ~p lot in the event of a future zoning change for the reasons I gave (see attached). If you were me, wouldn't you feel that way? I should not be a victim of erroneous information that may have affected some of the Council's thinking. ' I therefore request that the Council consider giving me the Grandfather zoning on this lot that I requested. I believe this to be a fair and reasonable request under the circumstances. Abe Shapiro I I I ~`.~d REC'~ AUG 1 41990 Abe Shapiro's talk to Vail Town Council on 8-7-90: Concerning my desire to build a single family residence on my W. Vail land, I believe it's important that the Council understand how we came to where we are so that my request can be considered in its proper perspective. After being a homeowner and developer-builder in Vail for 18 years, my wife and I wanted to find a quiet, out of the way piece of land that would enable us to build a modest 3,000 S.F. home with a caretaker unit and a place where we could keep a few horses and, if possible, still stay in Vail. When this land became available to us, consisting of almost 7 acres, surrounded on 2 sides by thousands of acres of USFS land and hundreds of feet from any existing built or to be built homes, we thought we found exactly what we were looking for with the Agriculture - Open Space zoning thereby enabling us to do all that we wanted. When I discussed my plans with Town Staff, I was told that I must have at least 35 acres to build a residence under this zoning. I discussed this with the Town Attorney and was advised that I could apply for a variance, which I did, and was denied. I then discussed this problem with my attorneys who suggested they research the Town's Zoning Ordinances and as you know, I am permitted to develop this land under the Agriculture - Open Space zoning, but with the restriction of building up to 2,000 S.F. GRFA for this single family residence. It's unfortunate that with almost 7 acres of land and with 1.39 acres of buildable area on it and located as it is, that I cannot have the home that I want! In any event, I intend to pursue the building of the home within the constraints and as permitted. By so doing, I am and will be incurring expenses for survey, topographical studies, engineering, environmental assessment reports, cultural reports, geographical hazard reports, legal costs, architectural costs, etc. for both my land and USFS access land which I estimate will come to over $50,000. While I will be doing this work in a diligent and consistent manner, I cannot be sure that I'll have everything done in time to have Design and Review approval before the Town's new zoning ordinances may become effective, possibly making it mandatory to have at least 35 acres for Agriculture - Open Space zoning! I think it only fair that under these circumstances that the Town give me the consideration of "Grandfathering" the present zoning on this particular parcel of land, so that I will be protected for tie present permitted zoning in the unlikely event that I do not have everything done that the Town's Staff requires of me in order to obtain the Town's Design and Review approval by the time this particular ordinance modification may take place. r i. r 'c. I don't think it's the Town's intent or desire to have me lose this substantial investment plus all my work and effort by~my running out of time so long as I am deligently pursuir.~g this effort. I would appreciate it very much of the Council would give me the time it will take to design and build this home in a manner that will allow it to be a compliment to Vail as ha:~ been the case with everything else I've built in Vail over the last 18 years. I respectfully ask that someone on the Council. make such a motion and that it be favorable approved. i I' i REC'C AUG 131990 GON ~ ~NENTAL EXPRE55 August 7, 1990 Ron Phillips Vail City Manager Town of Vail ' 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ron: Just a quick note to let you know that a early buy out on the lease we had with Bill Nottingham has. been concluded. As you know the economics for the service were not possible without community support. In that regard, I would like to thank you for your personal interest and work on trying to get community support. As the primary Colorado/Wyoming air carrier we will continue to concentrate our efforts on being the best provider of regional airline service for the communities that we serve or may serve in the future. Sincerely, enni R. Hea Vice PreSi ent/ General Manager DRHlslw E t cc: Don Smith HANGAR NO 6 • STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT • DENVER, COLORADO 80207 • (303) 388-8585 1 1 , r r r ~ ~.I~AY~AIFGHST'_~.~~ tl~ 1~ ~ ((?C ' Law: Court rules that Continental Can violated ERISA in layo f f case Page 84. ' Who's News: J.P. Bolduc is named • . ~ ~ ~ i ~ president o f W.R. Grace Page B8: Travel Industr ~ s Stalled. f or Second umm r i ~ . . , y~ S e naRow By JONATHAx DAHL 1 creases have slowed down this' sultlmer, And PAULINE Y03HIHASHI ~T R A Y E L I but prices are still 50% higher on some stafl&epo.tersoJT„Ew,.,.,.sTRFeraooxx~,. routes than a few years ago. Other travel The U.S. travel and tourism industry is letter. "Everyone has come down a lines. The National Park Service, mean- specialists are worried that as the baby having a slow summer for the second year notch," he says. Like most experts, Mr. while, says June traffic volume was flat. boom generation gets older, the percent- In arow. Cammisa says the shaky national economy Although Walt Disney Co. doesn't re- age of people in their 20s, a large traveling Nearly every sector of domestic leisure seems to be keeping travelers home. "In ~ lease attendance figures, analysts suspect group; is shrinking. They say baby. , travel-from the sprawling California bad times, discretionary travel is the first that Disneyland's business is at best flat boomers also may be a little burped out " theme parks to the quaint inns of Nan- to go," he says. and that DisneyWorld in Orlando is ahead tucket, Mass.-is reporting that business The news is good for travelers, since of last year. Universal Studios Hollywood from all their past trips. is flat or down 5% to 10% from last year. the slowdown is keeping many travel concedes its total gate is off slightly, with Americans went on a travel binge rllt Many airlines, hotels and car rental com- prices down. But it's troubling for airlines, stronger local attendance mitigating the the '80s," says John Savich, director of~ile panies say domestic business is flat, too. because most of them are in the midst of lack of foreign and out-of-state visitors. Michigan Travel Bureau. "Novi, .th just Fear of Prolonged Slump big fleet expansions. It's also worrisome "The tourists are not here" in Southern have less of a drive to travel; pari' ul That's a big change from the for several huge new resorts, casinos and California, says Joan Bullard, a • spokes- on long trips." ~ ~ _ double-digit increases the industry reveled theme parks-ranging from the Excalibur woman for the MCA tour. Few analysts are optimistic that there in durin most of the 1980s. More im r- Hotel in Las Vegas to MCA Inc.'s Univer- One of the hardest-hit areas is New will be a turnaround this fall: Often, air- g ~ sal Studios Florida in Orlando-that have • tantly, the slowdown comes only a few England, according to. travel experts. lines drop fares in this season, which gives months after air travel began rebounding, opened in the past few months. Some Nantucket hotels, for example, say •the travel industry a boost_But fuel prices which had raised some hopes that the in- Fewer Airline BOardings business is off 10% to 40% during the week. are expected to rise sharply soon, and that dustry wouldn't be hurt badly by the na- To be sure, a few regions, such as parts "We're not a bunch of happy campers could discourage a lot of carriers- from lion's weakening economy. Now, most ex- of Florida and Texas, are experiencing a right now," says Elizabeth Oldham, execu- dropping prices. "If you asked me a month perts are worried that the 5320 billion-a- strong summer. But overall, U.S. airline live director of the Nantucket Island ago, I would have said there would be dis- year travel industry may be headed fora hoardings fe110.7% in June from year-ear- Chamber of Commerce. counting in the fall," says Sky MagaFy, prolonged slump. lier figures, and analysts say July dcesn't "Just about nobody is doing very well," look much better. "The industry is just Along with the unstable economy, travel executive vice president of marketing for says James Cammisa, publisher of Travel having a soft summer," says John Tague, experts say high airline fares may be con• Northwest Airlines, a unit of NWA Inc. Industry Indicators, a Miami-based news- marketing vice president for Midway Air; tributing to the slowdown. The fare in- "Now, I'd say there would be less of it."