Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-28 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 1:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission Joint Meeting to Discuss Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Code 2. Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission Discussion of Policy towards Stop Work Orders on Construction Projects 3. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 4. Town of Vail Comment on Eagle County Review of a Proposed 649 Foot Communications Tower located 2.3 Miles Northwest of the West Vail/I-70 Interchange (Applicant: Global American Sites) 5. Request to Speak to Council concerning a Staff Decision on GRFA for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch (754 Potato Patch Drive) (Applicant: Michael Lauterbach) 6. Information Update 7. Other VAIL TOWN. COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 1:00 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 1. Town Council/PEC Joint Meeting to Discuss Proposed Tom Braun Amendments to the Zoning Code Kristan Pritz Action Requested of Council: Offer comments on the amendment alternatives that are presented. Background Rationale: This is the third in a series of meetings on proposed amendments to SDD's, GRFA, site coverage, and the pay-in-lieu parking program. A preliminary proposal for a "density bonus system," and additional information on the ramifications of the proposed GRFA definition, will be presented at this meeting. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommendation is to continue refining the SDD Density Bonus proposal and to pursue modifications to the GRFA ratio that will provide the most equitable compensation possible. Further, staff recommends moving on to the PEC for review of amendments to site coverage and the parking program. 4:00 2. Town Council/PEC Discussion of Policy towards Stop Work Kristan Pritz Orders on Construction Projects Gary Murrain Action Requested of Council: Clarify policy on stop work orders on construction projects. Background Rationale: Recently, there have been numerous stop work orders issued because projects were not constructed per the approved building permit plans. These actions have created a great deal of frustration for the staff and the construction community as well. Staff would like to confirm that the department is handling these issues per Council direction. Staff Recommendation: Clarify position on stop work orders. 4:30 3. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Kristan Pritz 4:45 4. TOU Comment on Eagle County Review of a Proposed 649 Foot Andy Knudtsen Communications Tower located 2.3 Miles Northwest of the West Vail/I-70 Interchange (Applicant: Global American Sites) Action Requested of Council: Review staff and PEC discussions and give a TOV recommendation to Eagle County. Background Rationale: On September 5, the Eagle County Planning Commission will review a proposal to build a 649 foot tower next to the existing 200 foot tower. As the proposed tower will have significant visual impacts on the TOV, the Town's input into the County review is important. Staff Recommendation: At this time, staff cannot support the proposal and recommends denial. Though staff recognizes that there are several benefits the tower would provide, it is unclear that a full 649 feet is necessary to provide the improved services. The Town has several concerns that the Environmental Impact Report does not address thoroughly (see enclosed memo). Therefore, staff recommends 'the tower be modified, the EIR be revised, and ghat affected communities in the Eagle Valley be allowed to comment on the revisions before the County makes their decision on thelproposal. 5:00 5. Request to Speak to Council concerning a Staff Decision on Kristan Pritz GRFA for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch (754 Potato Patch Drive)`=~(Applicant: Michael Lauterbach) - BackAround Rationale: See enclosed) staff memo and letter from Michael Lauterbach. 5:30 6. Information Update Ron Phillips 5:35 7. Other _2_ TO: Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: C~u~,unity Development Department Tom Braun DATE: August 28, 1990 RE: Joint Session to discuss amendments to SDDs, GRFA, Site Coverage and the pay-in-lieu parking program. The accompanying memos on the SDD Density Bonus System and GRFA outline specific recommendations for these amendments. As directed by the Council and PEC at the last joint session, the proposed amendments to SDDs will establish a maximum density increase based on performance criteria. New information on the implications of changing the GRFA definition, and different development scenarios for increasing the GRFA, are presented in the GRFA memos. The primary purpose of .this joint session is to discuss SDD~s and the issue of density. Information on GRFA will also be presented. It is our goal to reach some consensus on both of these issues in anticipation of drafting final amendment proposals. Final amendment proposals for site coverage and the pay-in-lieu parking program are under way. Both of these amendments have been discussed at previous joint sessions and the issues involved in these amendments are much less complex than with GRFA and SDDs. For this reason, it is our intention to continue dialogue with the PEC Task Force and proceed on to the Planning Commission with formal amendment proposals. ~ T0: Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Department of Community Development Tom Braun DATE: August 24, 1990 RE: Special Development District Amendments The key issue in amending the SDD section of the zoning code is density - - should density increases be allowed through the process and. if so, under what circumstances? There are many other issues to be covered during this amendment process (specific wording of design criteria, administrative fees, non- residential square footage, review procedures and overlay/underlying). However, density is the most significant issue because how density is handled will dictate the structure and organization of ordinance. There was general agreement at the July 31 work session that a maximum cap be placed on density increases approved through a SDD. This memo outlines five SDD ordinances that include some form of density bonus, a "bonus system checklist" that covers some of the key issues relative to density bonus systems and preliminary recommendations for a density bonus system. EXAMPLE OF DENSITY BONUS SYSTEMS The majority of all SDD ordinances permit some type of increase in density. The premise is quite simple, in exchange for increased density, the developer gives something back to the community. However, ordinances vary a great deal with regard to how much density can be increased, what is given back to the community and how the amount of density increase is determined. The following five examples demonstrate different ways of implementing a density bonus system. Breckenridge Breckenridge's Development Code essentially reviews every development in the town as a SDD. There are few pre- determined development standards, rather, all proposals are reviewed for compliance with over thirty "development policies". Some of these policies are "absolute" (they must be satisfied) and others are "relative" (if the impact of a project on a relative criteria is positive, points are awarded, if the impact is negative, points are taken away). After considering all policies, a project with a net positive point total is approved and a project with a net negative point total is denied (regardless of degree, a -1 means the same as -8, +l means the same as +9). i I 6 i . ~ This award winning system is quite complex and is'a radical departure from the development review process in Vail. While it is not directly comparable, there are some interesting parallels with regard to density. A property's "base density" is determined by the Town's land use plan. However, because Breckenridge considers overnight, . acc..,.~~odations to be .a "needed and desired general benefit to the town", a multiplier of 1.15 is applied to hotel, inn, motel and b+b development. Further, a 2:1 lodge room to condo calculation is also used. Any further increase in density is determined by the project's overall performance relative to the development policies. The better ,a project complies with development policies, the greater the density that is permitted. When this land use system was first adopted, density increases of up to 40$ were possible. After modifications to the point system were made 'in 1985, the highest increase for a hotel project :has been~9~. Longmont "Planned Unit Development" ~ Four different types of PUD's are permitted - residential, industrial, business and mixed use. PUD :review criteria address "big picture" issues such as land use and 'compliance with community plans. Density, circulati~~n, open ,space, lot sizes and other site specific design issues are addressed under "design standards". Density bonuse;~ are awarded for satisfying any one on 25 different categories (bonuses range from 1$ to 5$). The Commission or Counci:t may prohibit or limit an increase in density to avoid uns~~fe access, traffic congestion or excessive burdens on parks, schools,: fire protection, etc. The maximum increase for any project is 50$. With the exception of an abnormally long :List of public amenities/improvements, Longmont's system represents a very traditional bonus system. The community :Ldentified an extensive list of design characteristics and improvements that are considered public benefits. There improvements are traded off for density increases. While there is some element of discretion in the criteria, they are generally objective in nature. Park Citv "Master Plan Development" Park City's Land Management Code assigns "'credit ~ multipliers" to each lot. These credits are essentially "spent!' on various types of development. A "unit equivalent"'system is used to determine ultimate development potential. ;The system is structured to encourage hotel development, but only in specific locations. The incentive: for hotel development is so great that there are ess;entially~no quantified limits on density. However, development must conform with design standards and policies,, which, in effect, establish a site's maximum development potential. II • The MPD section states that density cannot be increased through the process, but the reality is that if you propose the type of development that is encouraged, your design and site characteristics are what determine your development potential - not quantitative limits. The MPD process is essentially required for any development over 4 units and uses are limited to the uses permitted in the zone district the MPD is located in. Steamboat "Planned Unit Development" Uses and density shall not vary from what is permitted by the zone district the PUD is located in. However, a density bonus system is provided in another section of the code. Units per acre have been assigned to each area of town (13.485 units/ac. at base of mountain is highest). Thirteen different credits may be used to increase project density. These credits are based on both objective and subjective considerations. An "adjustment factor" is then applied to determine ultimate development potential. This factor encourages small units, i.e. hotel rooms, with an adjustment of 1.37 for average room size of 500-700 sq. ft. Maximum density increase is limited to 80-125$. HILTON HEAD "Planned Unit Development" There is a five acre minimum for PUD's and density and uses must conform to the zone district in which the property is located. A bonus system is in place for four types of public improvements: bike paths and easements, dune restoration, neighborhood drainage and land for public beach access and parking. Bonuses for these improvements are only possible in certain zone districts. Specific minimum standards are established for each of the improvements, and the amount of density bonus varies by zone district. For example, a medium intensity motel zone district allows 7 rooms per acre for public beach access, 4 units per acre for drainage improvements and 4 units per acre for bike paths. The bonuses are half as much for dwelling units. There are no limits on square footage, this control is left to height and site coverage regulations. What do these examples tell us? Point systems, percentage systems, virtually no quantified limits to density - - a variety of mechanism are in place to provide density bonuses in exchange for project amenities and off-site improvements. In many cases PUD's are encouraged, and in some cases they are required. The PUD process is considered to be every bit a benefit to the public as it is to the applicant. In each of these examples, it is clear that the community has identified: * What they want in terms of public improvements and project amenities, * What types of development will be eligible for density bonuses, and II ® ~ ' * What locations in the community are most appropriate for accommodating density bonuses. Each of the five ordinances address these issues in different ways. Regardless of how it is structured, these bonus ,systems are designed to ensure that the any "bonus" development is consistent with the c.,~,....unities development goals. ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ESTABLISHING A BONUS SYSTEM There are a number of fundamental issues to be addressed during the development of a density bonus system. These eight questions highlight some of the most critical issues inherent in~any bonus system. 1) What type of development does the town what to encourage with the bonus system? The development of overnight accommodations is an 'adopted policy of the Land Use Plan and the Vail 'Village Master Plan. Commercial development is encouraged in Vail's pedestrian areas, but this type of development is ;addressed by the urban design plans and has not been a significant issue with regard to SDD's. Vail's plans and policies suggest that if density bonuses are to be granted,' they should be limited to residential development that'~increases the Town's overnight bed base. 2) Where are the appropriate locations for density bonuses? I The issue of where additional density may be appropriate is also addressed by the Land Use Plan and t'he Village Plan. The Village and Lionshead areas are the most appropriate, and probably the only appropriate locations for additional residential density. However, these land use policies should not be considered a carte blanc approval for greater densities. As stated in land use policy ~4.2, "Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as; the existing character of each area is preserved through implementation of the Urban Design Guide :Plan and~the Vail Village Master Plan". As a result, the potential for significant amounts of additional density within the two core areas is limited. 3) What types of public improvements, project amenities and/or design characteristics should be required in exchange for density bonuses? A good indication would be to consider th~a type of improvements and amenities provided by pr~aviously 'approved SDD's. Walkways, recreation trails, street lights,, bus stops, structured parking, employee housing, quality design, _ ~ convention and recreation facilities, and increased landscaping and open space are examples of some of these improvements. In other communities, density bonuses are "offered" for elderly housing, lodge rooms, solar energy design, handicap accessibility, joint use parking, fire protection improvements, new job creation, view protection and shadow impact. There are few parameters for what these improvements can be. The most important consideration, however, is that density bonuses should not be awarded for design standards or amenities that would normally .be expected in the first place. This is probably the most difficult aspect relative to designing a bonus system for Vail, in large part because previously approved SDD's have generally provided the amenities and design characteristics typically associated with density bonus systems. 4) Should the design standards for density bonuses be purely objective (quantified standards), have an element of subjectivity or a combination of both? The advantage of strictly quantified standards is that subjectivity and discretion is minimized. For example, Longmont allows a 3$ density increase for a 5~ increase in natural open space. However, there are no standards for where the open space should be and how it should be incorporated into the development or surrounding open space tracts. On the other hand, ,Steamboat allows a 1$ density increase for each 1$ of "effective" open space in excess of zone district requirements. "Effective Open Space" is a defined term and provides clear direction for how the open space should be incorporated into the project. What's the answer? ? It really depends on what the improvement is and what the community goals are. In most cases, a combination of qualified and quantified standards are probably best. Without some qualified standards, the town runs the risk of getting inferior improvements. As with the examples above, .you don't just want to encourage more open space, you want functional open space with public access that is integrated with existing open space parcels. 5) Should density bonuses be based on the project as a whole, or should they be "awarded" based on specific bonus criteria? The most commonly used approach for awarding density bonuses is to base the bonus on specific performance criteria (i.e., the public improvement or project amenity). Regardless of how many bonus criteria are offered, an overall maximum density bonus is typically established. It is not unheard of to award a density bonus based on the overall project. Dade County, Florida may increase project density by 10$, e ~ based on very broad criteria relative to the entire project ` and not tied to specific design features. Breckenridge's system allows bonus density, but only after a comprehensive evaluation of the project. Again, the answer depends upon what the town wants out of a project. If there are specific public improvements and project amenities that are desired (that the town is not getting with the existing SDD process), the bonus system should be designed around those specific improvements or amenities. If the goal of this amendment process is to simply apply an overall density cap, a bonus system that permits a maximum density increase based on the overall project should be established. 6) Should the percentage bonus be based on allowable devel~r.uent or existing development? - The majority of the development in the core areas ;occurred prior to the 1977 Growth Management Plan and subsequent down zoning. As a result, most development in these areas exceeds what is permitted by today's zoning regulations. If a bonus system is going to create the potential for additional development, the system must be based on the level of development permitted by the zone district in which the property is located - regardless of any existing non- . conforming situations. With this alternative, any density bonus would ultimately be relative to the size of the site, and not the existing level of development. If existing non- conforming situations are not disregarded, the bonus system will create little or no development potential on most sites. 7) Should exceptions to site development standards (setbacks, height, site coverage, etc.) be permitted in conjunction with a density bonus? This question raises the issue of how SDD criteria will relate to density bonus criteria. Without getting into the detail of how the review process would be structured, the answer is yes, development standards should be flexible regardless of the density bonus. The potential problem with allowing flexibility in site development standards is that an applicant may satisfy criteria for a density bonus and then ask for an exception to height limits in order to build the "bonus units". In response to this, the proposed review process is structured so that the SDD design criteria are used in conjunction with the density bonus criteria. SDD criteria will provide tools to review the site specific impacts (i.e. any deviations from the development standards of the property's zone district) of such a request. r 8) How would the criteria for density bonuses be structured with respect to SDD criteria, the Urban Design Guide Plans, etc.? As alluded to above, any density bonus would involve a two step review process.. Standards and criteria for a density bonus would be used to establish the maximum density bonus on a site. The project would then be reviewed with respect to SDD design criteria to evaluate detailed site specific issues and the proposed project's relationship to community plans. These questions are intended to prompt discussion of the many issues involved in a density bonus system. There are many specific issues, such as how the ordinance would deal with commercial and other non-residential square footage and whether a percentage bonus would deal with units and GRFA equally, that will need to be resolved. However, at this point in the process it is important to deal with these basic issues first and refine specific questions later. PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL FOR A DENSITY BONUS SYSTEM The following are preliminary recommendations for the major elements of a density bonus system for Vail: * Amend the SDD section of the code to state that density shall not exceed the zone district in which the SDD is located. The only exception to this would be for density approved through the Density Bonus Section. Previously discussed changes to the procedures section, design criteria and the underlying zoning issue would be made. * Adopt a Density Bonus Section as a part of the SDD chapter and a Density Bonus Overlay District (to include the area from Golden Peak to the West Day Lot - possibly to Cascade Village, excluding the Forest Road P/S area and possibly CCI). * Density Bonus Section will establish the following: * Density bonuses are limited to lodge rooms and/or other types of overnight accommodations. * Only those property's located in the Density Bonus Overlay District are eligible for density bonuses. * The number of units permitted under the Density Bonus System would be a percentage increase of a parcel's permitted level of development - regardless of any non- conformity. A limited amount of GRFA (400-500 square feet) would be permitted with every bonus unit. * The Density Bonus would be awarded based on performance. Public Improvements and project amenities required for density bonus may include: ~ _ i 1) Employee Housing ~ 2) Extension of the Town's Recreation Trail System, 3) Energy/Resource Conservation 4) The development of public recreation~or transit facilities 5) Dedication of land for public accessjand use 6) Open space in excess of that required by underlying zone district ~ 7) Implementation of Urban Design Plan sub-area concepts and/or Vail Village Plan sub-area concepts 8) Public art 9j Structured/underground parking facilities * After the amount of density bonus has been determined (based on performance as established by Improvements/ Amenities listed above), project review moves on to SDD Design Criteria. Any Density Bonus would not be considered approved until the proposed development complies with the SDD design criteria. Applying SDD criteria to a proposed development is done to ensure that the all impacts of a project are evaluated. With this process, a project that meets density bonus requirements may still be denied based on SDD design criteria. * Two step review process could be done concurrently. i This proposal is at a very conceptual level anal, if itjis acceptable to the Council and C~.,LL«ission, will need a great deal of refinement. Specifically, the question of what percentage of density increase is appropriate and what improvements and amenities should be required to obtain a density bonus will need further study. Density Bonus It is important that there be a balance between the amount of bonus allowed and the public improvements/amenities required. If the maximum density bonus is too low, or the required improvements too great, there is. no incentive for the developer to participate in the bonus, process: Theoretically this is a losing proposition for both the developer and the town. ~ Most of the bonus systems reviewed allow a maximum density bonus that realistically cannot be obtained. This is done one of two ways, either by the manner in which bonus percentages and .required improvements are: structured, or by incorporating site specific design criteria into the review process. The later of these alternatives is recommended for Vail's proposed system. Under this scenario, bonus density is not approved until the project complies with SDD criteria. Proposals may provide every amenity in the book and qualify for maximum density increase, but if the impacts of the proposal are not compatible with SDD design criteria (massing, open space, views, neighborhood compatibility, etc.), the project is not approved. Based in large part on this review process which includes site specific SDD criteria, and with consideration given to previous SDD requests, a maximum density bonus of 30-40$ is a realistic number. Performance Criteria The most important aspect in determining these criteria is to ensure that the bonus is awarded for project amenities that would not have been provided (or required) by the standard development review process. Defining these improvements/.amenities will be difficult. A good guide may be to look at the improvements provided by SDD's that have also received density increases. However, the ultimate determination should be made based on community goals and needs. wp:sddamd2 8/24/90 SDD AMENDMENTS/DENSITY BONUS ANALYSIS August 17, 1990 ~ _ sddanal.wkl NEW ACCOMMODATION UNITS Parcel 5 % 10 % 20 % 30% 40 50 % ° Pro3ect Size Bonus Bonus Bonus Bonus Borius Bonus COMMERCIAL CORE I Christiania/Chateau 0.66 1.? 3.3 6.6 9.9 13.2 16.5 First Bank 0.36 0.9 1.8 3.6 5.4 X7.2 9.0 Garden of Gods* 0.51 1.3 2.6 5.1 7.7 10.2 12.8 Holiday Inn 2.20 5.5 11.0 22.0 33.0 44.0 55.0 Sonnenalp/Talisman 3.20 8.0 16.0 32.0 48.0 6,4.0 80.0 Mountain Haus 0.49 1.2 2.5 4.9 7.4 9.8 12.3 Ramshorn* 0.53 1.3 2.7 5.3 8.0 1,U.6 13.3 Tivoli 0.41 1.U 2.1 4.1 6.2 8.2 10.3 Vail Athletic Club 0.61 1.5 3.1 6.1 9.2 12.2 15.3 Villa Valhalla 0.5U 1.3 2.5 5.0 7.5 1',0.0 12.5 Sonnenalp 0.55 1.4 2.8 5.5 8.3 1'1.0 13.8 Vail Village Inn* 3.46 8.7 17.3 34,.6 51.9 69.2 86.5 HDMF All Seasons 1.18 2.9 5.9 11.8 17.7 23.6 29.5 Apollo Park 2.85 7.1 14.2 28.5 42.7 57.0 71.2 Edelweiss 0.36 0.9 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.3 9.1 Doubletree* 2.62 6.6 13.1 26.2 39.3 52.4 65.5 Holiday House U.65 1.6 3.3 6.5 9.8 13.0 16.3 Ipanema 0.56 1.4 2.8 5.6 8.4 11.1 13.9 Lodge at Lionshead 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 Manor Vail 5.44 13.6 27.2 54.4 81.6 108.8 136.0 Marriott Mark** 5.17 12.9 25.9 51.7 77.6 103.4 129.3 Riva Ridge North U.27 U.7 1.4 2.7 4.1 5.5 6.9 Riva Ridge South U.35 U.9 1.8 3.5 5.3 7.0 8.8 Riverhouse 0.38 0.9 1.9 3.8 5.7 7.5 9.4 Tyrolean 0.37 0.9 1.8 3.7 5.5 7.4 9.2 Vail International U.0 0.0 (1.0 0.0 (1.0 0.0 • Vail Spa 3.20 8.(? 16.0 32.0 48.0 64.0 80.0 Vail Trails Chalet 0.44 1.1 2.2 4.4 6.6 8.8 11.U Vail Trails East 0.46 1.1 2.3 4.6 6.9 9.2 11.5 Villa Cortina 0.76 1.9 3.8 7.6 11.4 15.3 19.1 Vorlaufer 0.28 0.7 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7.0 Willows U.32 0.8 1.6 3.2 4.7 6.3 7.9 • Wren 1.37 3.4 6.9 13.7 20.6 27.4 34.3 COMMERCIAL CORE II Antlers 1.19 3.0 6.0 11.9 17.9 23.8 29.8 Enzian 1.20 3.0 6.U 12.0 18.0 24.0 30.0 Gondola Building O.U U.0 0.0 0.0 (i.0 0.0 Landmark 1.49 3.7 7.5 14.9 22.4 29.8 37.3 Lazier Arcade 0.0 U.0 (I.0 0.0 d.0 0.0 Lionshead Center p.0 U.0 U.U U.0 (I.0 0.0 Lionsquare Lodge 1.79 4.5 9.0 17.9 26.9 35,.8 44.8 Montaneros 1.U2 2.6 5.1 10.2 15.3 2U.4 25.5 Treetops 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vail Glo 0.0 O.U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vantage Point 0.91 2.3 4.6 9.1 13.7 18.2 22.8 OTHER PROPERTIES North Day Lot 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0~;.0 0.0 V . A . Shops U . U (1.0 0.0 0.0 0.. 0 0.0 West Day Lot U.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 U;.0 0.0 totals 120.3 240.5 481.1 (21.6 962.1 1202.7 4 TOWN OF VAIL SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS SDD No. 2 NORts~~~O0D8 YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 6, 1974 ZONING: ? PARCEL SIZE: 7.64 acres PURPOSE FOR 8DD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Project was tied into the redesign and redevelopment of the Vail Golf Club. SDD was referred to as an overall density decrease in the ordinance. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: ~ ~ ~ SDD No. 3 PITRIN CREEK PARR YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 25, 1974, amd. by #32 of '78, ZONING: MDMF PARCEL SIZE: 8.29 acres PURPOSE FOR 8DD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Density .increases over the property's zoning were approved in exchange for affordable housing restrictions. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: 156 condominiums were sold at below market rates to "locals". Use and resale restrictions designed to assure "affordability" expired seven years after project completion. BDD No. 4 CASCADE VILLAGE YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 5, 1976, amd. by #31 of '78 (Coldstream), #2 of '79 (Glen Lyon), #20 of 1984, #40 of '88, #12 of '89, #10 of '90, ZONING: unknown, property was PUD under Eagle County PARCEL SIZE: 17.9 acres PURPOSE FOR BDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: SDD #4 provides for mixed uses with concentration of very high density development around hotel/convention center/health club. Average density for entire project is 15.8 units per acre. PUBLIC BENEFITS: Creation of a "third village" and development of significant bed base has improved Vail's summer marketing potential, bike path and stream tract opened to public, employee housing, CMC facility. SDD. No 5 SIMBA RUN YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 6, 1976, amd. by #29 of '77, #32 of '78 (Vail Run), #16, 1987 ZONING: Approved under county, development plan was accepted by TOV as part of annexation agreement. PARCEL SIZE: 6.3 acres D PIIRPOBE FOR 8DD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: TOV accepted county approved development plan during annexation. SDD was the most appropriate zone district given the approved development plan. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: BDD No. 6 VAIL VILLAGE INN YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 7, 1976, amd. by #28 of '7;?, # 1 of '85, #14 OF '87, #24 of '89, ZONING: Public Accommodation PARCEL SIZE: 3.45 acres PURPOSE FOR BDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Mixed use, substantial density increase PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Increased bed base SDD No. 7 MARRIOTT MARK RESORT YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 3, 1977, amd. by #20 of '7'7, ZONING: Public Accommodation/HDMF ? ? PARCEL SIZE: 5.8 acres PIIRPOBE FOR 8DD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Density increase from underlying zone district. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Subsequent amendments were done in part to develop the convention facility, this addition has done a great deal for summer visitation and the marketing of this project. SDD No. 8 FALLRIDGE YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 17 OF 1977 ? ZONING: Low Density Multi-Family PARCEL SIZE: 1.3 acres PIIRPOBE FOR BDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Fall Ridge and the Golf Course Town Homes were at some point zoned SDD #1. In 1977, the Golf Course Town Homes were zoned LDMF and Fall Ridge designated SDD No. 8. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: ~ ~ SDD No. 9 There is no record of a #9 BDD No. 10 VALLI HI YEAR ADOr+~D: Ord. 7 of 1979 ZONING: Residential Cluster PARCEL SIZE: 10.05 acres PIIRPOBE OF BDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONING: Project received a considerable density increase and relief from design review guidelines in exchange for employee rental use restrictions. ~ _ ~ PIIBLIC BENEFITS: The community gained 199 apartments at a time of a severe employee housing shortage. SDD No. it HIGHLAND MEADOWS YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 26 of 1981, amd. by #27 of '84, ZONING: Primary/Secondary ? ? PARCEL SIZE: 13 acres PIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: The SDD allowed flexibility in development standards in order to design around geologic hazards. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: The approved development plan minimized the disruption of land that would have been necessary to mitigate geologic hazards. SDD No. 12 Originally assigned to Sonnenalp redevelopment, approval lapsed. SDD No. 13 WIRTB~wn~ELER YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 18 of 1984 ZONING: Primary/Secondary PARCEL SIZE: 1.02 acres PIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: One of the SDD's three lots was inaccessible due to excessive grades. The SDD was done in order to abandon lot lines, thereby allowing the third duplex to be located in an area that was accessible. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: The SDD allowed for a reasonable development solution on the lot without severe retaining walls or road cuts. SDD No. 14 DOIIBLETREE HOTEL YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 5 of 1986, amd. by #7 of '89, #1 of '90, ZONING: High Density Multi-Family PARCEL SIZE: 2.63 acres PIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: The redevelopment plan entailed a substantial density increase, building height over HDMF height limits, slight setback encroachments and pay-in-lieu parking provisions. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Increase in bed base, considerable improvements to site SDD No. 15 BISHOP PARR YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 13 of 1986 ZONING: High Density Multi-Family PARCEL SIZE: .71 acres f PURPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: Relatively minor increases to building height, setbacks, GRFA. SDD process has been credited with allowing for creativity and flexibility in design of project. PUBLIC BENEFITS: Developer provided cash contribution for development of stream walk. SDD No. 16 ELR MEADOWS YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 19, 1987, amd. by Ord. 32 of '87, ZONING: Residential Cluster ? PARCEL SIZE: 3.6 acres PIIRPOSE OF BDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: ' SDD allowed for small lot size, thereby maintaining a large portion of the site as undisturbed open space. Density was actually reduced during SDD process. PUBLIC BENEFITS: Reduction of density may be considered a benefit, preservation of open space certainly is. SDD No. 17 RAMSHORN YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 27, 1987 ZONING: Public Accommodation PARCEL SIZE: .464 acres PURPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: Redevelopment of lodge allowed for increase ir.? GRFA, but no increase in existing number of units. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Developers funded and constructed sidewalk alc?ng Vail Valley Drive. SDD No. 18 VICTORIAN AT VAIL YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 30 of 1987 ZONING: Residential Cluster PARCEL SIZE: .9 acres PURPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: The sole reason for the SDD was to allow for t:he subdivision of the five units as single family homes. There was no increase in density. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: None BDD No. 19 GARDEN OF GODS YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 40, 1987, amd. by #14 of :L990 ZONING: Public Accommodation PARCEL SIZE: .5 acres PURPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: SDD approved variations in setbacks and a slight increase in GRFA. ' PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Surface parking on the site will be relocated to an underground structure, the developers will construct a sidewalk and a bus stop as a part of the redevelopment of the property, employee housing. BDD No. 20 There is no record of X20 SDD No. 21 VAIL GATEWAY YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 9 of 1988 ZONING: Initially Heavy Service, rezoned to CCI as part of SDD PARCEL SIZE: .5 acres YIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: CCI zoning was adopted to allow for mixed uses on the property, development exceeded CCI height limits. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Pedestrian walkway is to be constructed on north and west sides of property. SDD No. 22 LIONS RIDGE ~3 YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 23 of 1988, amd. by #13 of 1990 ZONING: Primary/Secondary PARCEL SIZE: 10.69 acres PORPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATION FROM ZONE DISTRICT: SDD allowed greater flexibility in the design of the 24 single family lots. Density is actually reduced by this approval. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Density reduction and commitment that if secondary units are built, they are restricted to employee rentals. SDD No. 23 VAIL NATIONAL BANK YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 9 of 1989 ZONING: Initially HDMF, rezoned to Commercial Service Center as part of SDD. PARCEL SIZE: ? PIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATION FROM ZONE DISTRICT: SDD was necessary to allow for continuance of office use, and small expansion. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: Developer dedicated a small portion of property to facilitate access to VVMC. BDD No. 24 Faessler Employee Housinq Project - denied SDD No. 25 WARNER Dr.~~LOPMENT YEAR ADOPTED: Ord. 14 of 1990 ZONING: Primary/Secondary PARCEL SIZE: appx. 1 acre _ PIIRPOSE OF SDD/DEVIATIONS FROM ZONE DISTRICT: . To allow exceptions to site coverage and GRFA limitations. PIIBLIC BENEFITS: ' Secondary units in each of the three lots will be restricted to long term employee rentals. wp:tovsdds 8/19/90 TO: Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department Tom Braun DATE: August 21, 1990 RE: Amendments to the GRFA system This memo outlines the next step in refining amendments to the GRFA system. Based on input during the July 31 work session, the following assumptions have been made: 1) The new definition for GRFA is conceptually acceptable to the Council and PEC. Further work will be done to specific terminology used to define how GRFA is to be calculated. 2) The garage credit will be maintained, and garages will not be made a requirement. Language will be added to clarify precisely what spaces constitute a garage. 3) There is support for maintaining some type of credit, or allowance for mechanical areas and airlocks. 4) There is a lack of consensus on how the GRFA ratio should be increased to compensate for square footage "lost" as a result of the new definition. REVISED GRFA PROPOSAL The goals of this effort are to simplify the GRFA system and to establish an ordinance that is both understandable and enforceable. The new definition for how GRFA is calculated will significantly improve the staff's administration and enforcement of this ordinance. To simplify the system, it was our objective to eliminate as many of the existing credits as possible and incorporate appropriate allowances for these "credits" into the GRFA ratio. For good reason (energy conservation and health/ safety), credits for airlock and mechanical spaces were a part of the July 31 GRFA proposal. However, these credits were in conflict with our overall goal of eliminating credits in order to simplify the system for calculating and checking GRFA. After meeting with the PEC Task Force, a new proposal has been developed. This proposal has only one credit (garages), is based on one ratio and involves one calculation. Everything inside the exterior walls of a structure (excluding attics and crawl spaces) will count as GRFA. All other credits and allowances have been eliminated. .e;. The revised definition for GRFA is the following: Gross residential floor area (GRFA) means ithe total square footage of all levels of a building, as me~~sured from the inside face of exterior structural walls (excluding furring, sheetrock, plaster and other similar wall :Finishes), to include all covered or roofed spaces enclo:aed on three of more sides. GRFA shall include, but not bca limited to, elevator shafts and stairwells at each level, lofts, mechanical chases, vents, storage areas anti attic ad crawl spaces. A. Single family, two-family and primary,isecondary development may exclude the following areas from calculation as GRFA: 1. Enclosed garage of up to three hundred (300) square feet per vehicle space, not exceeding a maximum of two spaces per constricted dwelling unit. 2. Attic space with ceiling height of five feet or less, as measured between the told side of the structural members of the floor and the underside of the structural members of the roof directly above, shall be exempt from GRFA calculations (an attic area which is created by ccrostructi~on of a roof by truss-type members will lie exempt from calculation provided that the trusses are spaced no further than thirty inches ap~~rt). 3. Crawl space accessible by an opening not to exceed nine square feet in area and with five feet or less ceiling height, as measured from the surface of the ground or structural floor to the underside of structural members of the floor/ceiling assembly above, shall be exempt :From GRFA calculations. GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the itotal square footage of a building as defined above. Dcaductions from the total square footage shall then be made four garages, attics and crawl spaces as defined in paragraphs :L through 3. Any square footage in excess of the maximum crcadits alliwed shall be included in the calculation of GRI?A. Other factors relevant to this change, * Adequate mechanical spaces shall be a:~sured through the enforcement of the Uniform Building Code and the Mechanical Code. * Submittal requirements will be amendeci to require dimensions on drawing and cross-sections as may be required. * A written "Interpretive/Policy Statemcant" shall be drafted to provide further clarification on how GRFA will be measured. - _ - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE GRFA RATIO The purpose of amending the GRFA ratio is to compensate for a reasonable amount of the square footage that would be lost by virtue of the new definition. The obvious question is how much square footage should be compensated for in the new GRFA ratio, and what mechanism should be used to "build this square footage into the new ratio". A variety of scenarios were presented to the PEC Task Force on August 22. The issue of compensation came down to: 1) Maintaining the status quo by increasing the GRFA ratio equal to the amount of square footage that can be built under the existing definition, 2) Eliminating all credits (with the exception of garages) and leaving the GRFA ratio at .25, or 3) Doing something in between. After a great deal of discussion, the Task Force reached a consensus to add 450 square feet into the GRFA ratio as compensation for the elimination of credits and other allowances. The justification for this number is that the mechanical credit (50/unit), airlock credit (25/unit), and stairwell allowance (150/unit) should be maintained. The storage credit (200/unit) was considered unnecessary, primarily because the garage credit provides ample room for storage. There are three alternatives for adding 450 square feet to the GRFA ratio. With each of these alternatives, it is important to remember that there are no more credits, no allowances for stairwells, etc. The amount of development permitted is established solely by the GRFA ratio. The alternatives are: Increase GRFA Ratio Simply increasing the existing .25 ratio will allow more square footage to be built on a lot. However, there is a fundamental problem with this approach because increasing the ratio will not treat all lots equally. For example, an increase to .295 will allow 2,950 sq. ft. on a 10,000 square foot lot, a 450 sq. ft. increase from what is allowed by the existing .25 ratio. On a 30,000 sq. ft. lot, .295 will allow 5,925 sq.ft., an increase of 675 sq. ft. from what is allowed by the .25 ratio. The accompanying spreadsheet (Ratio Increase Alternative) provides an analysis of how various changes will affect development on lots ranging in size from 10,000 to 30,000 square feet. Add 450 Square Feet to Existing Ratio The existing ratio could be maintained at .25, and simply amended to add 450 square feet to each lot. The amount of development on a lot would be (lot size X .25) + 450. I ~ ' Graduated Scale System This alternative would involve a GRFA Table:, with different GRFA ratios for different lot sizes. The i:able would be similar in form to a tax table. The advani:.age of this alternative is that it is more equitable iii how changes to the ratio would affect various lot sizes. The problem is that in certain cases, a larger lot may be penaitted less GRFA than a smaller lot. Refer to the accompanying spreadsheet (Graduated Scale Alternative) :Eor an example of how this could be structured. ! i RECOMMENDATIONS ON A REVISED GRFA SYSTEM At this point, the mechanics of how the GRFA ratio is structured are not as important as the degree to which they are changed. Based on previous work sessions, it is apparent that people have many different perspectives on how, if at all, the ratio should be changed.. In proposing the 450 square foot figure, the Task .Force and staff agreed that for the change to be fair, certain credits and allowances must be maintained. However, the storage credit and other "miscellaneous" spaces (spaces not currently counted as GRFA such as vents and flues, bay windows, void spaces and substantially enclosed spaces) do not need to be coipensated. The loopholes in the existing system are well documented. The impact of closing these loopholes will vary depending on how the existing system has been utilized. If a designer or developer takes these loopholes to an extreme, these changes to the GRFA system will have a dramatic, if not devastating impact on their development potential. If a designer or developer utilizes the existing credits and allowances in a manner cor.~sistent with their intent, the change is relatively insignificant. ~ The major change in the proposed system is the elimination of the storage credit. With very few exceptions, thiso credit has simply been used to increase the size of homes, with little relationship to its intent - storage. Another justification for eliminating this credit is that storage can be provided within the 600 square foot garage credit. I wp:GRFAAMD2 8/23/90 i i r- RATIO INCREASE ALTERNATIVE GRC)SS RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA AUGUST 25, 1990 grfaincr.wkl PROPOSED COMPENSATION SCENARIU #1 SCENARIO #2 0 ALLOWABLE PROPOSED TOTAL @ .30 LOT SIZE GRFA(.25) ALLOWANCES SQ.FT. ; @ .30 % W/5% RED. 9K 10000 2500 450 2950 ; 3000 5(I 1.7% ; 3000 50 1.7% ; 11000 2750 450 3200 i 3300 100 3.1% ~ 3300 100 3.1% i p 12000 3000 450 3450 ; 360(1 150 4.3% ; 3600 150 4.3% ; 13000 3250 450 3700 ; 3900 200 5.4% ; 3900 200 5.4% ; 14000 3500 450 3950 ; 4200 250 6.3% ; 4200 250 6.3% ; ~V' 15000 3750 450 4200 ; 4500 300 7.1X 4500 300 7.1% ; ~ 16000 3850 450 4300 ; 4600 300 7.0% ; 4550 250 5.8% ; 17000 3950 450 4400 4700 3.00 6.8% ; 4600 200 4.5% ; 18000 4050 450 4500 ; 4800 300 6.7% ; 4650 150 3.3% ; 19000 4150 450 4600 4900 300 6.5% ; 4700 100 2.2% ; 20000 4250 450 4700 5CJ(JO 300 6.4% ; 4750 50 1.1% ; 21000 4350 450 4800 ; 5100 3(JO 6.3% ; 4800 0 0.0% ; 22000 4450 450 4900 ; 52(10 30(1 6.1% ; 4850 -50 -1.0% ; 23000 4550 450 5000 5300 300 6.0% 4900 -100 -2.0% ; 24000 4650 450 5100 5400 300 5.9% ; 4950 -150 -2.9% ; 25000 4750 450 5200 ; 5500 3(10 5.8%'; 5000 -200 -3.8% ; 26000 4850 450 5300 ; 560(1 3UU 5.7% ; 5050 -250 -4.7% ; 2700(1 4950 45(J 5400 ; 5700 300 5.6% ; 5100 -300 -5.6% ; 28000 5050 450 5500 ; 5800 300 5.5% ; 5150 -350 -6.4% ; 29()00 5150 450 5600 5900 300 5.4% ; 5200 -400 -7.1% ; 30000 5250 450 5700 ; 6000 300 5.3% ; 5250 -450 -7.9% ; 1l,. NOTES Figures do not reflect 1200 sq ft garage credit ~ Proposed allowances as per PEC Task Force and Staff recommendation Scenario #1 reflects GRFA increase to .30, and % indicate change relative to total GRFA permitted with proposed allowances Scenario #2 ie identical to #1, with exception that GRFA reduction at 15000 square foot lot size is 5% instead of current 10% l- GRADUATED SCALE ALTERNATIVE GRC)SS RESIDENTIAL FLUOR AREA ALiGUST 25 , 1990 grfagrad.wki EXAMPLE OF GRADUATED GRFA TABLE ALLOWABLE PROPOSED TOTAL REQ. GFRA LOT SIZE GRFA(.25) ALLOWANCES SQ.FT. RATIO LOT SIZE GRFA RATIO 10000 2500 450 2950 0.2950 0-10000 0.30 11000 2750 450 3200 0.2909 10001-11000 0.29 12000 3000 450 3450 0.2875 11001-12000 0.29 13000 3250 450 3700 0.2846 12001-13000 0.28 14000 3500 450 3950 0.2821 13001-14000 0.28 15000 3750 450 4200 0.2800 14001-15000 0.28 ~ 16000 3850 450 4300 0.2688 15001-16000 0.27 17000 3950 450 4400 0.2588 16001-17000 0.26 18000 4050 450 4500 0.2500 17001-18000 0.25 19000 4150 450 4600 0.2421 18001-19000 0.24 20000 4250 450 4700 0.2350 19001-20000 0.24 21000. 4350 450 4800 0.2286 21001-21000 0.23 22000 4450 450 4900 0.2227 21001-22000 0.22 23000 4550 450 5000 0.2174 22001-23000 0.22 24000 4650 450 5100 0.2125 23001-24000 0.21 25000 4750 450 5200 0.2080 24001-25000 0.21 26000 4850 450 5300 0.2038 25001-26000 0.20 27000 4950 450 5400 0.2000 26001-27000 0.20 28000 5050 450 5500 0.1964 27001-28000 0.20 5150 450 5600 0.1931 28001-29000 0.19 30000 5250 450 5700 O.lyu0 'O^^~-3000 0.19 a ' CHRONOLOGY OF CHANGES TO GRO88 REBIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA The following is a brief summary of the changes that have been made to the GFRA system as it pertains to single family, p/s and duplex development. 1969 First zoning ordinance is adopted Residential zone district allowed .33 FAR Definition of "floor area": The sum of the gross horizontal areas of all floors of a building, including habitable penthouses and habitable attic space, but not including vent shafts, courts or uninhabited areas below ground or in attics. Site coverage was 25~ 1973 Major revision to zoning ordinance Floor area ratio was reduced to .25 Definition of "Floor area, gross residential": The total floor area within the enclosing walls of dwelling units or accommodation units, including closets, service areas, and interior walls within the units, but excluding balconies, hallways, corridors, stairwells, garages, and service areas outside the dwelling unit or accommodation unit enclosures, and uninhabitable heating or mechanical equipment areas. Site coverage was 25$ 1976 Adopted decreasing GRFA formula: .25 of lot area up to 15,000 sq. ft. .10 of lot area between 15,000 and 30,000 sq. ft. .05 of lot area over 30,000 sq. ft. Aggregate total of GRFA for two-family residences was limited to 4,000 sq. ft. Site coverage was reduced to 20$ 1977 Primary/Secondary district was created No maximum limit on GRFA (i.e., 4,000 limit on two-family) 1978 4,000 sq.ft. maximum on two-family was repealed 1980 Limitations placed on areas that do not count as GRFA mechanical 50 per unit airlock 25 per unit garage 600 per unit Other areas with less than 6'6" floor to ceiling clearance did not count as GRFA - no limit to this space. The basic GRFA definition currently on the books was adopted in 1980 i ® ~ _ i i 1982 Storage credit of 200 square feet per unit is adopted Other areas with less than 5 feet floor to ceilinglclearance did not count as GRFA - no limit to this space. ' I 1986 250 Ordinance is adopted, basically adding 250 sq.ift. of development to every single family or duplex unit in town (500 square feet per lot). i I I There have basically been two types of changes to GRFA,jhow much is allowed and how it is defined. In practical. application, how GRFA is defined has far more bearing on what c~~n be built than the permitted GRFA ratio. For example, when tt?e GRFA ratio was reduced from .33 to .25, it may not have result:ed in smaller homes because there were still no limitations on the types of spaces that did not count as GRFA. Changes in '80 and i'82 established some of these limitations, but the addition~of the word "habitable" created a whole new realm of 'the "void space". The accompanying spreadsheet demonstrates the approximate amount of GRFA that could have been built under various definitions. However, because each definition allowed for a certainiamount of - intangible space, these numbers are only a relative indication of how permitted development has changed over the years. I I I wp:grfahist ' 8/22/90 j I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I ~ _ S CHRONOLOGY OF CHANGER TO GRO88 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA The following is a brief summary of the changes that have been made to the GFRA system as it pertains to single family, p/s and duplex development. 1969 First zoning ordinance is adopted Residential zone district allowed .33 FAR Definition of "floor area": The sum of the gross horizontal areas of all floors of a building, including habitable penthouses and habitable attic space, but not including vent shafts, courts or uninhabited areas below ground or in attics. Site coverage was 25$ 1973 Major revision to zoning ordinance Floor area ratio was reduced to .25 Definition of "Floor area, gross residential": The total floor area within the enclosing walls of dwelling units or accommodation units, including closets, service areas, and interior walls within the units, but excluding balconies, hallways, corridors, stairwells, garages, and service areas outside the dwelling unit or accommodation unit enclosures, and uninhabitable heating or mechanical equipment areas. Site coverage was 25$ 1976 Adopted decreasing GRFA formula: .25 of lot area up to 15,000 sq. ft. .10 of lot area between 15,000 and 30,000 sq. ft. .05 of lot area over 30,000 sq. ft. Aggregate total of GRFA for two-family residences was limited to 4,000 sq. ft. Site coverage was reduced to 20$ 1977 Primary/Secondary district was created No maximum limit on GRFA (i.e., 4,000 limit on two-family) 1978 4,000 sq.ft. maximum on two-family was repealed 1980 Limitations placed on areas that do not count as GRFA mechanical 50 per unit airlock 25 per unit garage 600 per unit Other areas with less than 6'6" floor to ceiling clearance did not count as GRFA - no limit to this space. The basic GRFA definition currently on the books was adopted in 1980 i ® ~ _ . i - 1982 Storage credit of 200 square feet per unit is adopted Other areas with less than 5 feet floor to ceiling clearance did not count as GRFA - no limit to this space. ~ i 1986 250 Ordinance is adopted, basically adding 250 sq; ft. of development to every single family or duplex unit~in town (500 square feet per lot). I There have basically been two types of change~c to GRFA; how much is allowed and how it is defined. In practic~~l application, how GRFA is defined has far more bearing on what c:an be built than the permitted GRFA ratio. For example, when t:he GRFA ratio was reduced from .33 to .25, it may not have resulted in smaller homes because there were still no limitations on the types of spaces that did not count as GRFA. Changes in '80 and~'82 established some of these limitations, but th~a addition of the word "habitable" created a whole new realm of the "voi;d space". i The accompanying spreadsheet demonstrates the approximate amount of GRFA that could have been built under vari~~us definitions. However, because each definition allowed for .a certain amount of intangible space, these numbers are only a relative indication of how permitted development has changed over the years. I wp:grfahist ~ 8/22/90 ~ I I i I I I I I I I I MAJC?R CHANGES TO GRFA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL COMPARISION AUGUST 23, 1990 grfahist.wkl 1969 1973 1976 1980 1982 1986 1990 ALTERNATE .33 GRFA .25 GRFA .25 GRFA .25 GRFA .25 GRFA .25 GRFA Proposal PROPOSAL LOT SIZE No Credits No Credits Grad. Red. Cred. added Stor. added 250 added .25 + 450 .25 + 850 l0000 3300 2500 2500 2650 3050 3550 2950 3350 11000 3630 2750 2750 2900 3300 3800 3200 3600 12000 3960 3000 3000 3150 3550 4050 3450 3850 13000 4290 3250 3250 3900 3800 4300 3700 4100 14000 4620 3500 3500 3650 4050 4550 3950 4350 15000 4950 3750 3750 3900 4300 4800 4200 4600 16000 5280 4000 3850 4000 4400 4900 4300 4700 17000 5610 4250 3950 41Up 450(1 5000 4400 4800 18(100 5940 45(10 4(150 42(10 4600 5100 4500 490(1 19000 6270 4750 4150 4300 4700 5200 4600 5000 20000 6600 5000 4250 4400 4800 5300 4700 5100 21000 6930 5250 4350 4500 4900 5400 4800 5200 22000 7260 5500 4450 4600 5000 5500 4900 5300 23000 7590 5750 4550 4700 5100 5600 5000 5400 24000 7920 60(10 465(1 4800 5200 5700 5100 550(1 25000 8250 6250 4750 4900 5300 5800 5200 5600 26000 8580 6500 485(1 5000 5400 5900 5300 5700 27c?oa 8910 6750 4950 510(1 5500 6000 5400 5800 28000 9240 7000 5050 5200 5600 6100 5500 5900 29000 9570 7250 5150 5300 5700 6200 5600 6000 30000 9900 7500 5250 5400 5800 6300 5700 6100 NOTES 1) Numbers in each year do not reflect square footage that could be built under "informal/unregulated allowances" i.e. overlapping staircases, mechanical rooms, uninhabited spaces, etc., this adds a min. of 300 sq ft to each lot 2) Garages were not included in GRFA calculations until credit was adopted in 1980 3) 1969- no limit on "uninhabitable space" below ground, no reduction in ratio at 15000 square feet lot size 4) 1973- GRFA reduced to .25, no limit to spaces not counted as GRFA 5) 1976- GRFA reduced to .1 at 15000 sq ft lot size, two-family limited to 4000, no limit to spaces not counted as GRE( 6) 1980- Credits for garages, mechanical and airlocks are adopted, no limit to space w/<6'6" clearance 7) 1982- Storage added ae credit, no limit to space with <5'clearance 8) 1986- "250 Ordinance" adopted essentially adding 500 square feet of development to each duplex and p/s lot PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION August 27, 1990 11:00 Site Visits 3:00 Public Hearing SITE VISITS 1. Approval of the minutes form the August 13, 1990 meeting. 1 2. A request for a work session for a major subdivision, to approve the preliminary plan, a request for a variance to the maximum height for retaining walls, and a request for a variance to the maximum percent grade for a road, on a parcel commonly referred to as Spraddle Creek, an approximate 40 acre parcel located north and east of the Main Vail I-70 interchange and east of the Spraddle Creek livery. Applicant: George Gillett, Jr. 4 3. A request for an exterior alteration on Lot C and Lot D, and the southwesterly 4 feet of Lot B, all in Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st Filing, 227 Bridge Street (Covered Bridge Building). Applicant: Hillis of Snowmass, Inc. and Bruce Amm & Associates. - 4. A request to apply an underlying zone district of Public Accommodation all of Lot 4 and Lot 7, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Third Filing, a subdivision recorded in Book 221 at Page 992 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records, part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255 at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records and a request to apply an underlying zone district of High Density Multiple Family to all of Lot D and a part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255, at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records. Both properties know as 715 West Lionshead Circle (The Marriott Mark Resort). Applicant: M-K Corporation ,i I i 3 5. A request for a work session on the Sonnenalp remodel and proposed Special Development District at 20 Vail Road, Part of ~~Lot L, Block 5-E, Vail Village last Filing,. Applicant: Sonnenalp Properties, 'Inc. 5 6. Eagle County referral--64!5' tall transmission tower located 2.3 miles N.,W. of th'e West Vail I-70 interchange. Applicant: Global American sites 'i i 2 7. An appeal of a staff deci:~ion concerning GRFA for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch (754 Potato Patch Drive). Applicant: Mike Lauterbac:h TABLED 8. A request for a major amendment to~iSDD No. INDEFINITELY 16, part of parcel A, Lionsridge Subdivision, Filing 2. (The Valley Phase III) ~ Applicant: Brad & Susan T'jossem I i I i I i I I i I ~I I I I I i I I i i i i i I I I i i is 9 A~ ' TO: Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department . DATE: August 28, 1990/August 27, 1990 RE: Eagle County referral of a proposed 649' tall tower to be located 2.3 miles northwest of the West Vail/I-70 interchange. Applicant: Global American Sites I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Currently, Eagle County is reviewing a proposal to construct a 649 ft. tall tower approximately 2.3 miles northwest of the West Vail/I-70 interchange. It will be located next to the existing 280 ft. tower. The proposed tower will be 5 ft. in diameter. It will have three sets of guide wires which will be grounded up to 405 ft. from the tower. The most noticeable aspect of the tower will be three sets of white strobe lights located at the base, middle, and top of the tower. These lights will operate 24 hours a day. A building may be built at the base of the tower to house transmitting equipment. The building, if built, will be approximately 30' x 50' and will be two stories tall. The applicant, Global American Sites, claims that the tower is needed because the existing tower cannot handle additional antennas. The proposed tower will have 850 of the current tower's capacity. In addition to two radio stations using the tower for transmission, the tower would be able to accommodate many other uses including microwave antennas, cellular antennas, 50,000 pagers, medical alert signals for individual people, T.V. antennas, T.V. translators, etc. II. ISSUES: 1. Visibility Of the issues identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) submitted by the applicant, the primary concern is the visual impact. The EIR states that the visibility of the tower will be relatively low because people focus their attention on other points up and down the valley and not on the ridge where the tower will be built. The EIR further states that people do not notice the existing tower without looking for it specifically. However, since the new tower will be approximately 2-1/2 times the height of the existing tower, it will be very evident against the skyline. 1 Y, More importantly, the white strobe lic~hts willmake it ` highly visible during both day and nic~ht. The impacts of the tower during the night were not: analyzed in the EIR, even though this is the time which the tower will be most visible. The strobe lights az-e the most significant impact of the proposal bec;ause they draw attention to the tower at all times oi' the days. Staff discussed the Federal Aviation Admini:~tration i(FAA) lighting requirements for towers such as this with an FAA representative. Strobe lighting 'Ls not a ~ requirement. The minimum number of Eights are four. All four would be red and the top and middle bights would have to flash. 2. Height Staff would like to know if a shorter tower could provide an adequate level of service. The EIR states that the higher the tower, the better the angle into the Valley and the better the transmission. However, it does not provide specific details .showing the various heights needed to reach the different areas within the Valley. Without these details at this time, staff is not convinced that a 649 ft. tower is justified. Other options may exist. For example there may be less visual impact with two towers, each half the height located on different ridges. In summary, staff would like to see a tower that provides~as much service as possible with the least amount of height. I 3. Location i Town of Vail staff would like to have information on why this ridge was chosen and if there are any other sites that are suited which have less impact visually on existing communities. 4. Tower Color ~ The applicants have described an acids treatment for the steel that could be done which would bring itinto compliance with the Forest Service standards for reflection. It is unclear how the tower would look and what color it would be, but the EIR infers that the treatment would soften the appearance:. More details on this treatment in the EIR should be ~~rovided before decisions are made. A potential coni`lict exists, however, because the acid treatment may not meet the i 2 I i w ~ ~ - 1y FAA standards, which may require orange and white stripes (stripe widths must be one seventh of the tower height). Staff recommends the acid treatment, if possible. However, if it must be painted orange and white, then the EIR should be revised to address the visibility of the paint before the County Commissioners make a decision on the proposal. 5. Additional Towers A last issue is the precedent. How many other towers will be built on this ridge in the future? Staff understands that the owner of the existing tower has only nine years left on his lease. Will the owner of the 649 ft. tower (the potential owner of the land) renew the lease so that the 280 ft. tower will continue to operate? If the lease is not renewed and the tower is no longer uses, the 280 ft. tower should be removed. If both towers do continue to operate, is 850$ of additional space needed for the Valley? Staff would recommend that the County condition their approval (if approved) to ensure that the ridge will be limited to two towers to avoid having more several towers proposed on this prominent point. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the PEC/Town Council recommend that the County require a more thorough analysis in the EIR to address the concerns listed above. At a minimum, the strobe lights should be eliminated in exchange for red lights. In general, staff acknowledges that the tower has the potential to benefit the Eagle Valley by providing better emergency services, improved radio and T.V. reception, and unique services that are not currently available. However, staff support of the tower, with these services, is limited to a proposal that has the least amount of impact on surrounding communities. At this time, we still have questions that we believe should be addressed before any final approval is given. Lastly, staff would appreciate the opportunity to review a revised EIR before the County takes final action. 3 ~ ~ _ ! r: I ~ Proposed ~ Proposed Site ~R'ithfn 649' Tower Section 10, - Existin Township 5 South, ~ ~7 r 280' Tower Range 81 ~'Yest ~ 70 Avon ~ Yail ~ ~ 6 Eagle/Vail i i I Beaver I CCw2k 24 ~ Minturn I i I i I I i - O11'~ ~ Location Map 0 1 2 4 miles I Figure 1 i . i i I - I. I i • ~ ~ Global American - Vai! Site eagle; County, Coronado i i ~ EDAW _ I Jury 1990 g Volume X, Number 155 Servin Eagle County Tuesday through Sunday August 24, 1990 Firm wants 64~-foot tower above Dowd Junction By RebeCCa Bennett The County Planning Commis- modate a new wireless digital space on the tower to augment its weeks to build. Global American is Daily Stiff Writrt lion will review the tower request security system, cellular phone and coverage area and provide a clearer under contract to buy the 40-acre at a public hearing at 1:30 p.m. television translator equipment; signal, he said. site from Nottingham Ranch Co. A Florida company wants to Sept. 5 at the County CourUrouse in transmit medical-alert signals; and Davis called radio towers Tlrc proposal says "viewer build a649-foot-high radio tower Eagle. County Commissioners will allow a dispatch-and-paging an- "necessary evils." •orientation" predominantly away with strobe lights near Dowd Junc- review the plan Sept. l I: tenna system big enough for 50,000 "One radio tower against the sky from the tower, and the low scenic lion, but concerns over visual im- The steel tower, equipped with pagers and 7,500 walkie-talkies. is not necessarily all that often- quality of surrounding landscape pact may stand in the way of three sets of supporting guy wires Jerry Davis, owner of KZYR slue." "should result in the tower not county approval. and three levels of lights (lashing radio station said the tower "would The proposal has approval from being perceived as a significantly Ron Crider, of Global American day and night, would be more than help solve some major broadcast' the Federal Aviation Administration adverse visual intrusion." Sites in Vero Beach, Fla., is propos- twice as tall as the existing tower problems in the valley." The taller and meets Federal Communications '"There are no viable project sl- ing w build the "multi-use -which it would join, not replace. tower would increase "line-of- Commission and other local and tematives," the company said. telecommunications facility" next At 850 times the capacity of the sight" to antennas, reducing echoed state regulations, according to Eagle County Director of Com= to an existing 280-foot tower at existing tower, the new tower radio signal and the "static" on Global American, munity Development Keith Montag .Davos Hill, northwest of the West would increase power to KSKI and home and caz radios, he said. If approved by the county, the $6 " Vaif exit.. KZYR .radio . stations; accom- ' KZYR ins interested in renting million project would take -three ' . Please see Tower page 13 Tower From page 1 • disagrees. A smaller tower could be Montag said the county has tower are: interference with uses of built at a higher elevation, he said, received comments from a number the existing tower, potential health or several smaller translators could of agencies expressing concern hazards of electromagnetic radia- be erected, he said. about the tower, including tJrc U.S. lion on any future residents of the Montag said visual effects "are Forest Service, Vail Associates and area, and impacts on wildlife, espe- the biggest impact in my mind." the Town of Vail. cially during construction. "One major selling points of the Approval would establish a recreation (in tl?e Vail Valley) is the precedent for other towers in that Montag said the staff has not yet high visual quality of the area," he area. "What we don't want to cud finalized its position. "we've iden- said. "Any degradation of the up with is a tower farm," said Mon- titled the issues and we are still scenic quality would impact the tag. reviewing the (comments) coming economic stability of the county." Other staff, concerns about the in as well as the proposal itself." ~ _ ~ t. t TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 27, 1990 RE: An appeal of a staff decision concerning GRFA for Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch (754 Potato Patch Drive). Applicant: Mike Lauterbach I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST Mike Lauterbach, the owner of Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch, has appealed a decision of the planning staff concerning the determination of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA for this lot. The staff position is that the Primary/Secondary structure, which is currently under construction, is presently 881 sq. ft. over the allowable GRFA for the site. II. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY A. On March 7, 1990 the Design Review Board granted final approval for the applicant's Primary/Secondary residence. Drawings submitted for the DRB review indicated that 294 sq. ft. of GRFA was remaining at this time. In other words, the applicant had not utilized the full GRFA available for the site. B. On March 14, 1990 a building permit was issued to the applicant for the construction of the Primary/Secondary residence. Modifications were made to the approved DRB drawings, however, a building permit was issued. Said modifications included the addition of 499 sq. ft. of GRFA. This additional floor area put the structure 205 sq. ft. over the allowable GRFA for the site. C. On August 3, 1990 a Stop Work Order was issued by the Community Development Department for this lot. The reason for this Stop Work Order was that the project violated the allowed GRFA for the property. In addition, discrepancies with regard to approved retaining walls versus constructed retaining walls was also noted. The walls currently on site are not built per the approved building permit plans. i i l i D: On or about August 15, 1990, the applicant submitted a revised set of drawings for the property. At this time the applicant indicated that there were certain modifications made to the structure not in conformance with the approved DRB plans. Upon analysis by the staff, these "as-built" plans indicate that the project is now 319 sq. ft. over the allowed GRFA for~the site. In addition to this, an over-excavated area of approximately 562 sq. ft., which is located beneath the existing garage on the east half of the duplex, would also need to be counted as GRFA. Iri total, the project is 881 sq. ft. over the allowable GRFA. I E. On August 17, 1990 the Town staff made the determination that it is not within our administrative power to negotiate a solution to th~a GRFA problem, beyond what is allowed by the zonin~~ on the property. The staff position is that the proj~sct must conform to the allowable GRFA on the lot. The Zoning Code does not give the staff any discretion tic approve a GRFA overage. I III. BUILDING CODE CONSIDERATIONS Section 303 (C) of the Uniform Building Code--Validity of the Permit also relates to the GRFA issue. It states: I "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be v~~lid. i The issuance of a permit based upon plans, ~ specifications and other data shal]_ not prevent the building official from thereafter requiring the correction of errors in said plans„ specifications and other data, or from preventing building operations being carried on thereunder when in violation of this code or of any other ordinances of this jurisdiction." I IV. DECISION REQUESTED OF THE PEC The PEC is asked to review the applicant's appeal and, pursuant to Section 18.66.030 of the Town's Zoning Code, either confirm, reverse or modify the action of ;the Zoning Administrator. I _ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 20NE CHECK FOR SFR, R, RP/S 20NE DISTRICTS DATE: LEGAL: LOT BLOCK FILING ADDRESS: OWNER: PHONE ~ ARCHITECT: PHONE iF LOT SIZE: 20,909.0 PROPOSED USE: 20NE DISTRICT: SFR RES R P/S Y N N GRFA ALLOWED ON SITE 4,341.0 ALLOWED SITE COVERAGE 4,181.8 SITE COVERAGE USED 2,838.0 SITE COVERAGE REMAINING 1,343.8 ' LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 12,545.4 TOTAL GRFA USED ON SITE 4,047.0 MAX. SG.FT. FOR SECONDARY UNIT 1,736.4 STATUS OF SECONDARY UNIT ~ 40X (74.6) FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE MECH. STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SOFT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S 1ST. FLOOR SC.FT. 1,075.0 584.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E 2ND. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,035.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 103.0 28.0 18.0 C 3RD. FLOOR SG.FT. 662.0 0.0 69.0 0.0 97.0 0.0 0.0 0 LOFT FLOOR SG.FT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N TOTALS 2,772.0 584.0 134.0 0.0 200.0 28.0 18.0 p TOTAL GROSS SOFT. 2,772.0 A CREDIT TOTALS *GAR.spaees 2.0 584.0 134.0 0.0 200.0 25.0 18.0 R GRFA ALLOWED 4,341.0 Y TOTAL CREDITS 961.0 ' GRFA USED 1,811.0 GRFA REMAINING 2,530.0 CREDITS REMAKING 16.0 66.0 50.0 0.0 (3.0) 0.0 FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE MECH. STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SG.FT. 851.0 0.0 80.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P 1ST. fL00R SG.FT. 1,325.0 555.0 55.0 0.0 107.0 0.0 0.0 R 2ND. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,081.0 0.0. 31.0 0.0 100.0 28.0 28.0 I 3RD. F100R SG.FT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M LOFT FLOOR SOFT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' A TOTALS 3,257.0 555.0 166.0 40.0 207.0 28.0 28.0 R TOTAL GROSS SC.FT. 3,257.0 Y CREDIT TOTALS #~GAR.speces 2.0 555.0 166.0 40.0 207.0 25.0 28.0 GRFA ALLOWED 2,530.0 U TOTAL CREDITS 1,021.0 N GRFA USED 2,236.0 I `tRFA REMAINING ° 294.0 T CREDITS REMAKING 45.0 34.0 10.0 0.0 (3.0) 0.0 TOTAL UNUSED CREDITS 215.0 61.0 100.0 60.0 0.0 (6.0) 0.0 i o BUILDING PERMIT I _ I 20NE CHECK FOR SFR, R, RP/S 20NE DISTRICTS DATE: ~ LEGAL: LOT BLOCK FIU NG ~ ADDRESS: OWNER: PHONE ~ ~ ARCHITECT: PHONE ~ LOT SIZE: 20,909.0 PROPOSED USE: ZONE DISTRICT: SFR RES R P%S Y N N GRFA ALLOWED ON SITE 4,341.0 ~ ALLOWED SITE COVERAGE 4,181.8 i • SITE COVERAGE USED 2,838.0 SITE COVERAGE REMAINING 1,343.8 ~ LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 12,545.4 ~ TOTAL GRFA USED ON SITE 4,546.0 MAX. SQ.FT. FOR SECONDARY UNIT 1,736.4 STATUS Of SECONDARY UNIT ~ 40X (270.6) ~ FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE MECH., STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SOFT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S 1ST. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,160.0 618.0 52.0 0.,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E 2ND. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,118.0 0.0 26.0 0.,0 114.0 26.0 13.0 C 3RD. FLOOR SOFT. 717.0 0.0 62.0 0,.0 96.0 0.0 0.0 0 LOFT FLOOR SOFT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,0.0 0.0 N TOTALS 2,995.0 618.0 140.0 0.0 210.0 26.0 13.0 0 TOTAL GROSS SC.FT. 2,995.0 A CREDIT TOTALS liGAR.spaces 2.0 600.0 140.0 0.0 210.0 25.0 13.0 R GRFA ALLOWED 4,341.0 Y TOTAL CREDITS 988.0 GRFA USED 2,007.0 GRFA REMAINING 2,334.0 CREDITS RENAMING (18.0) 60.0 50.0 0.0 (1.0) 0.0 FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE MECH. STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SO.fT. 958.0 0.0 89.0 0.0 0.0 i0.0 0.0 P 1ST. FLOOR SOFT. 1,485.0 585.0 53.0 40.0 111.0 0.0 0.0 R 2ND. FLOOR SOFT. 1,168.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 104.0 29.0 18.0 I 3RD. FLOOR SC.FT. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M TRANSFER OF CREDIT 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,0.0 0.0 A TOTALS 3,611.0 603.0 174.0 40.0 215.0 29.0 18.0 R TOTAL GROSS SO FT. 3,611.0 T CREDIT TOTALS tf~GAR.spaces 2.0 600.0 174.0 411.0 215.0 25.0 18.0 GRFA ALLOWED 2,334.0 U tOTAI CREDITS 1,072.0 N GRFA USED 2,539.0 I GRFA REMAINING (205.0) T CREDITS RENAMING (3.0) 26.0 11).0 0.0 (4.0) 0.0 TOTAL UNUSED CREDITS 120.0 (21.0) 86.0 61).0 0.0 (5.0) 0.0 I I I I I I _ ~ AS-BUILT ZONE CHECK FOR SFR, R, RP/S ZONE DISTRICTS DATE: LEGAL: LOT BLOCK FILING ADDRESS: OWNER: PHONE S ARCHITECT: PHONE ~ LOT SIZE: 20,909 PROPOSED USE: ZONE DISTRICT: SFR RES R P/S Y N N GRFA ALLOWED ON SITE 4341 ALLOWED SITE COVERAGE 41'81.8 SITE COVERAGE USED 2838 SITE COVERAGE REMAINING 1343.8 LANDSCAP COVERAGE 12545 FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE NECN. STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SOFT. 1,170 558 35 53 0 0 0 1ST. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,174 0 27 0 111 25 15 2ND. FLOOR SOFT. 718 0 65 0 97 0 0 3RD. FLOOR SOFT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 3,062 558 139 53 208 25 15 TOTAL GROSS SO FT. 3,062 CREDIT TOTALS ti~GAR.spaces 2 558 139 50 208 25 15 GRFA ALLOWED 4,341 TOTAL CREDITS 995 GRFA USED 2,067 GRFA REMAINING 2,274 CREDITS RENAMING 42 61 (3) 0 0 0 FLOOR TOTAL GARAGE STORAGE MECH. STAIR AIRLOCK VOID BASEMENT SC.FT. 940 0 124 0 0 0 0 1ST. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,500 587 55 40 109 0 0 2ND. FLOOR SG.FT. 1,238 0 33 0 105 32 16 3RD. FLOOR SG.FT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSFER OF CREDIT 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 TOTALS 3,678 587 212 43 214 32 16 TOTAL GROSS SOFT. 3,678 CREDIT TOTALS MGAR.speces 2 587 200 43 214 25 16 GRFA ALLOWED 2,274 TOTAL CREDITS 1,085 GRFA USED 2,593 j GRFA REMAINING ' (319) CREDITS RENAMING 13 (12) 7 0 (7) 0 TOTAL UNUSED CREDTTS 101 55 49 4 O (7) O _ ~ , town of nail 75 south frontage road office of community development vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 (303)479-2139 August 21, 1990 Mr. Mike Lauterbach P.O. Box 3451 Vail, CO 81658 RE: Lot 3, Block 2 Vail Potato Patch/Duplex GRFA Dear Mike: On August 3, 1990 your primary/secondary development on the above lot was issued a stop work order by the Community Development Department. The reason for the stop work order was that the project violated the allowed GRFA for the property. In addition, there is also a problem with the retaining wall. The walls are not built per the approved building permit plan. On August 15, 1990, a meeting was held to review the GRFA problem with you. Gary Murrain, Mike Mollica and I attended the meeting with you. On August 17, 1990, Ron Phillips, Larry Eskwith, Gary Murrain, Mike Mollica, and I met to review the Town's position to come to a resolution for the GRFA problem. We can approve the structure at a square footage of 4341 sq. ft. This amount is what the current zoning allows even though this is larger than what the DRB approved plans indicate. The Town staff has determined that it is not within our administrative power to negotiate a GRFA solution beyond what is allowed by the zoning on the property. Staff must maintain the position that the project conform to the allowed GRFA for the lot. The zoning code does not give the staff any discretion to approve a GRFA overage. Section 303 (c) of the Uniform Building Code--Validity of Permit also relates to the GRFA issue. It states: i I I ® i MIKE LAUTERBACH j ~ LETTER, PAGE 2 "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be const;~rued to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of ;any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinancejof the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. i I The issuance of a permit based upon plans;, specifications and other data shall not prevent the building official from thereafter requiring the correction of e2-rors in said plans, specifications and other data, or from pi-eventing~building operations being carried on thereunder when in violation of this code or of any other ordinances of i:his jurisdiction." I In order to resolve the GRFA issue, you have itwo options using the municipal review processes. The first is to appeal the staff decision to the Planning Commission. If the ;appeal isireceived by August 22 by 5:00 p.m., the staff will schedule your request for the August 27th Planning Commission meeting. TheiPlanning Commission will review the issue and make a decision. !This decision will be final unless an adjacent property owner appeals the Planning Commission decision or the Town Council calls it up. The PEC decision of August 27th will be reported at the August 28th Council work session. If the PEC decision is appealed or called up by the Town Council it will be reviewed at the September 4th evening Council meeting. The sctaff has~also agreed to schedule the GRFA issue as a work session item for~the August 28th Council work session. This will give you the opportunity to address the Council personally on the issue before waiting until the September 4th meeting. Secondly, you may submit an application for s3 GRFA or!density variance. The next submittal deadline is August 27th!for a September 24th PEC meeting. The Council may also ca1R up a PEC decision on a density variance. If the Coun~~il chose~to call up the September 24th PEC decision, it would be heard at~the October 2 Town Council evening meeting. ~ i Attached to this letter are the GRFA calculations for the DRB, Building Permit, and As Built plans. •At this time, the staff is relying on your as-built plans to be accurate. If for any reason you know of any inaccuracies in these plans, I ask that you notify the staff, in writing, immediately. i i I i i a ~ MIKE LAUTERBACH LETTER, PAGE 3 In addition, the retaining walls have been extended beyond what was originally approved on the building permit. The walls also appear to exceed the height limits. A retaining wall may be a maximum of three feet in the front setback and a maximum of six feet on other areas of the site. I ask that you address this issue by submitting a set of revised plans to our department by August 24, 1990 which meet the zoning code and building code requirements for retaining walls. If you have any further questions about the process, please feel free to call me. Thank you for your assistance on this matter. Sincerely,, Kristan Pritz Community Development Director KP/PP cc: Ron Phillips Gary Murrain Larry Eskwith Mike Mollica v _ 3:30 ~ MEMO T0: Kristan Pritz Town of Vail Community Development FROM: Mike Lauterbach DATE: August 22, 1990 RE: Lot 3, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch/Duplex GRFA I am in receipt of your letter dated August 21, 1990. Pursuant to the contents of that letter, please allow me to confirm that I am appealing the staff's ruling regarding GRFA to the August 27, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission. Additionally, please include my name and this issue as an agenda item for the Council work session of August 28, 1990 as we discussed. Also, to my knowledge, the as-built plans are totally accurate as submitted. WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 8/24/90 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS Page 1 of 1 8/8/89 ,WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEKATION LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for A new advocate for petition circulation is being sought. (request: Lapin) annexation. Cindy Callicrate to be contacted. 2/27 SATELLITE POST OFFICE (request: ON: Pursue station "in town" and/or increase Meeting to be set, up with Ernie Chavez. Summer bus service Osterfass) summer bus service? increased. 5/1 AMEND CODE, 12.04.240, STREET CUT TAN/LARRY/KRISTAN: Per Council direction, proceed. Pam has given original ordinances to Stan. Recommended PERMITS changes to be presented to Council in September. 6/12 VAIL GLO SIGN (request: Levine) RON/KRISTAN: Through DRB, or some other process, Kristan will handle by September 15. can the lettering ,color and lighting be modified? 6/26 AIR QUALITY USAN: Issue of passive smoke and smoking in Susan has been given assignment. restaurants needs to be revisited by this fall. 6/26 TED KINDEL MEMORIAL ODD 0.: Track down ownership of land to the south Land is all owned by VA. VA says a plaque can be placed (request: Rose) of the Christiania. If this belongs to the TOV, there. A letter from VA is forthcoming. Stan has begin to formulate memorial plan, i.e., park contacted Gordon Britton, who will have a plaque made up. bench, plaque, etc.? 7/17 BIKES/ROLLER BLADES AND SKATES/ KEN/LARRY: Should bicycles, roller blades, etc. be Researching appropriate ordinances for application in 1991. SKATEBOARDS prohibited from highly pedestrianized areas in the Village and Lionshead? 7/24 AG/OPEN SPACE~AMENDMENT LARRY/KRISTAN:.Legal research requested to make Research underway. ORDINANCE AG/Open Space 35 acre minimum per unit. 7/27 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES IN LARRY/STAN: Work with Holy Cross Electric to Scheduled to begin this fall. EAST VAIL establish special improvement district(s) far undergraunding utilities in East Vail. 7/27 HOTEL/CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS KRISTAN/LARRY: Develop list of hotels with Will provide by August 28. condominium approvals. 8/7 JOHNSON/GATES MEETING RON: Schedule discussion w/Bud Gates and Linda Will do. Johnson prior to November general election. 8/14 WINTER '90-'91 PARKING PLANS COUNCIL: Any proposed fee/pass scheduled should be Parking & Transportation Advisory Committee meeting held submitted to Ron, preferably by Friday, 8/17/90, Thursday, 8/23, and recommendations will be presented to and no later than 1:30 p.m., Thursday, 8/23/90, Council on 9/4. for review by the Parking and Transportation Advisory Committee. RESOLUTION N0. 20 Series of 1990 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN ELECTION TO INCREASE COUNTY SALES TAX IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO FINANCE A COUNTY-WIDE BUS SYSTEM. WHEREAS, a county-wide bus system has been in existence for the past several years; and WHEREAS, the County is unable to continue the funding of the bus system past September of 1990; and WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail considers it desirable that the bus system continue in operation past that date. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, that: 1. The Town Council supports the continuation of the county-wide bus system past September of 1990. 2. The Town Council supports the holding of an election to determine whether or not the sales tax should be increased in an amount sufficient to continue funding the county-wide bus system past September of 1990. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of August 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk ktt ~ tiuu 2 1 1990 The attached letters have recently been recieved and it has been requested that they be forwarded to the Mayor of Vail and all Town Council members. Thank You i REC'0 AUG 2 ~ 190 i. f I John & Sarah Rockwell 39 Beekman Place I Madison, CT 06443 j i July 12,1990 Mayor Kent Rose & The Vail Town Council I Vail, CO 81657 II i Dear Honorables: ~ I Please do NOT approve the re-zoning of Marriott-Mark Resort. li We have been pazticipating in the wonders of Vail for decades now, and we aze in the process of bringing the third generation of our family into the Vail experience via our family's home at 425 Forest Road, residence of Dr. & Mrs. Alfred Uihlein. I We are extremely concerned about the aggressive efforts oi' the Marriott-Mark Resort and others to change the zoning for their property, ~Nhich we understand is already at maximum density. We feel that any increase to current zoning parameters would be not only against the wishes of our fancily, but also a travesty to the quality of Vail which has been promoted and protected for almost 30 years. i While increasing the square footage of one hotel's holdings in town may provide a short term tax benefit, we feel that the precedent set would be an inappropriate signal to other absentee commercial land owners that, "ThE~ sky is the limit!" I We the people are the limit, and it is our feeling that Marriott-Mark Resort and others currently enjoy a more than adequate return on their investment because we have already done such a good job of maintaining zero defects in the quality of our community. i Please help us maintain this trend by holding fast to current zoning in ~Ithe Marriott- Mark Resort precedent setting case. Our family certainly appreciates your maintaining the quality of Vail in this action. Sincerely, I i ~I I John & Sarah Rockwell Dr. & Mrs. Allied Uihlein Pam & JP Beneducci Bill Uihlein Ben & Judith ',~teck ~ d ~ ~1~1~~~ II ~ I I , REC'0 AUG 2 1 1990 cam. d~~ o~~,~ ufa: ~o~ >a Q~,'oo, ~f-~~~550 August 8, 1990 MAYOR KEN ROSE Town Council - Vail, Colorado Dear Sir: My family and I have been part of the international community of neighbours who have selected Vai( as their second home, for the last 15 years. We are continuous travellers to Europe, the Far East, the United States, and other parts of the world, and we have never seen a resort that equals "VA I L" in any aspect. The natural beauty of the valley and mountains, through the whole year, the quality of the snow, clear skies and pure air, as well as shops, restaurants, etc., makes it the perfect spot for skiing and meeting ~ friends in a quiet, sophisticated -atmosphere. Aside from this, the municipal services, hospital, and in general the excellent administration of the town authorities. Through some of our neighbours and friends we received the most distressing news that Marriott-Mark Resorts is contemplating the expansion of their property, building a gigantic hotel on the banks of Gore Creek in Lionshead, which is destined to higher quality and residen tial zoning. We believe this would create a precedent open ing the doors for more building in any of the open spaces which are so indispensable, thus loosing its exclusive flavour and personality. - Our family, as well as our Mexican and Venezue- lan friends and neighbours feel that if Vail suffers such a dramatic change, we would be obliged to look for other skiff areas either in Colorado or in Utah. In view of the foregoing, we would like to request your reconsidering your decission and turn down Marriott's projects for expan 'on. Best regards, ely y ur , I AUG 2 1 1990 i J. E. R. CHILTON ill • P. C. BOX 20+9 • OALLAS. TEXAS 7572f July 17, 1990 Mayor Rent Rose and The Vail Town Council Vail, CO Dear Mayor and Town Council: ~ I would like to express my deep concern over the problems we are facing due to "overbuilding" and the effect thereof on the future of our lovely city of Vaill. As an owner at Lodge Towers, my family rind I look forward to "getting away" from the big city, bi,g traffic and the commercialism of Dallas. That is why we chose Vail for our second home; the mountains, the ski:Lng, fresh air and quietness, and, the people! I would hai~e to see ~~all that be annihilated by auto exhaust, noise pollution, air pollutants and the loss of trees and wide-open-spaces that go with "expansion and so-called development". I' Please, Mr. Mayor and Town Council, do whatever you can to keep our city the sanction we have always known it to be. BIGGER, for the future of Vail, IBS NOT BETTER! Sincerely yours, i E. R. Chilton Lodge Towers in Vail 200 Vail Road Vail, Co. 81658 i JERC/jah I I i i I ~LOSgY & IrOMPANX, INC. August 20, 1990 Via Facsimile Jill Kammerer, Senior Planner Department of Community Development 'Yawn of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 8165? Dear Ms. Kammerer. Slosky do Company, Inc,, would be pleased to assist the Town of Vail in reviewing the sire characterization and corrective action plan for the Alpine Standard leaking underground storage tank site (including the Gateway Center). It is anticipated that the review will evaluate these two documents sad provide the Town with guidance on the following issues: o Adequacy of technical iaforniation for decision-making; o Efficacy of the proposed cleanup plan, including duration of cleanup; o Adequacy of cleanup levels (soil and groundwater); o EnvironmentalJpublic health impacts from air emissions of hydrocarbons; sad o Discharge of treated $roundwater to the sanitary sewer system (POTVV). We norma]ly charge for such services an a tisae plus direct cost basis. Attached is an estimated budget for reviewing the site characterization and corrective action plan documents. This budget includes one site visit and attending one ~oaeetiag of the Town Council. If additional work is requested, it will be billed at the hourly rates shows in the attached budget. Please feel free to contact me if you have say questions. Slosky da Company appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services to the Town of Vail. Sincerely, Leonard C. Slosky President Leonard C. Slosky, President Bank Western Tower 1675 Broadway ~ Suite 1d00 Denver, Colorado 80202 ~ (303)825.1911 ~ a 'L~ S 3 ~ A~ 7 1.i R A 7.i ~t P1 k W TAT s r~~ r-. r. c • n • n n I E~au?~IATED BUDGET _ Review of Documents Concerning Alpine Staadud C'arrective Ac#lon ~nael ~Iourly Rata I ~4~ • Environmental Scientist/Project 11 $80 $880 Manager (5lasky) Air Quality Specialist (Reeser) S $85 $425 Hydrologist {Logsdon) 14 $85 $1,190 Wastewater Engineer (Sovern) 3 $75 I 5225 Subtotal Personnel 33 I, $2,720 Direct Cost Clerical 5100 Mileage $100 Other 550 Subtotal Direct Costs $234 TOTAL i $2,970 I I i SLOSKY I~& COMPANY. INC. e o a •ees 3 '231•iaJ' 12i QOM 'inb?33 ~ Iraa E z z o 0 6 •o z '•B o 8/21/90 Council - Reminder Just a reminder about the Vail Board of Realtors meeting Tuesday, 8/28, in the Library Community Room. All of Council is invited to attend to speak as a panel to the group (9:00 - 10:00 a.m.) regarding what's happening in Vail real estate-wise; the current status of all development within the TOV limits; and the latest discussions which have taken place. Afterwards, there will be a question/answer period for about 10-15 minutes. Ron will be attending as well. If you have questions regarding the panel discussion, you can contact Linda at her office (Vacation Properties Network) at 949-4560. Thanks! .~,2~~ /bsc Vail RECD AUG 141990 Al~i~ie Gnu cle~i August 13, 1990 Mr. Kent Rose, Mayor, and Members of the Vail Town Council TOWN OF VAIL 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Kent and Council Members: We appreciate the strong support that the Town of Vail has given to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens in the five years that we have worked to create an alpine garden in Ford Park. The lease of land in the TOV Master Plan for Ford Park and capital grant from the Real Estate Transfer Fund to construct the Mountain Perennial Garden were significant boosts toward making this garden a reality. The Betty Ford Gardens now occupy about a third of the space set aside for an alpine garden in the Master Plan for Ford Park. They are becoming an important summer asset to Vail, even as we are developing them. While we have no way of counting the number of people who visit the garden over the summer, volunteers and Board members alike report a constant stream of visitors through the garden each day and large numbers before and after concerts in the Ford Amphitheater. Visitors are very impressed with the design of the alpine garden and with the wide variety of plant material that can be grown in Vail. There are over 1500 varieties of plants in the perennial garden alone. The new meditation garden, to be started in a few weeks and planned for completion next spring, will provide another dimension to our focus on the Rocky Mountain landscape. It will be followed, as fundraising allows, by a rock alpine garden and visitors center which will focus on native alpine and subalpine plants of the Rocky Mountain region. The Board of the Vail Alpine Garden is asking the Town Council to consider another capital grant of $25,000 to be used for construction of the Mountain Meditation Garden. We feel that it is important to maintain our momentum of construction each season so that Ford Park will be finished as soon as possible for the community to enjoy. From our perspective, we would also like to see the garden finished as soon as possible for Mrs. Ford to enjoy! 183 GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 303-476-0103 i I r Mr. Kent Rose and Members of the Vail Town Council August 13, 1990 Page Two i I To provide an overview of our activities and accomplishments of the past year, as well as our plans for the future, I am enclosing the following materials for your review: o Spring fundraising letter and brochure showing the master plan of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens o Budget for the new Mountain Meditation Gardcan i 0 1989 Annual Report ~ o Financial statements of the organization i o Operating budget for Vail Alpine Garden, Inc:. o Recent issues of the Vail Alpine Garden Bul]Letin ~ Members of our Board would welcome the opportunii:y to meet with the Council to answer questions you may have about tYie alpineigarden or about our community programs. I Sincerely, Helen S. Fritch President of the Board j i I i I f I I I i I I I I . II i I ~I C RECD AUG 141990 THE BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDENS MEDITATION GARDEN REVISED BUDGET AUGUST 1990 MATERIALS LABOR TOTAL EXCAVATION TRACK LOADER @ 100/HR 8HRS 1600 BACKHOE @ 200/DAY 1000 LANDSCAPE TRACTOR @ 660/WK 3960 TOTAL 6560 0 6560 WATER FEATURE HARDWARE 697 800 PUMP 1000 CONTROL BOX - 250 ELECTRIC 500 LINER 45' X 45', 120' X 10' 2500 250 SAND 40 CU YD, TRUCKING INC 920 150 3/4" GRAVEL, 20 CU YD 400 COBBLES 10 CU YD 400 150 DECORATIVE GRAVEL 4 CU YD 200 METAL EDGING 150' 60 150 300 SQ FT WEED MAT 30 VAULT 750 250 TOTAL 7707 1750 9457 ROCK PERMITS 500 TRUCKING 800 CRANE TIME 1200 750 FORK LIFT 450 MISC ROCK 2000 CONCRETE 1000 200 TOTAL 5950 950 6900 WALKWAY STONE FOR WALL - 12 TON 720 1200 304 6' TIMBERS 8' 3500 1200 BARK MULCH 30 CU YD 1350 300 SANDSTONE 240 SQ FT 200 500 8 SANDSTONE STAIRS 6' X 6' X 24" 480 200 TOTAL 6250 3400 9650 SOILS MOUNTAIN PEAT 180 CU YD @ 35 6300 300 TOP SOIL 250 CU YDS 2500 TRUCKING 1250 TOTAL 10050 300 10350 i I I , I II ~ i i II PLANT MATERIAL 50 8'-10' SPRUCE TREES @ 95 5550 700 Il DWARF CONIFERS 3500 500 DAPHNES 120 1200 160 THYME 60 FLATS 660 300 MAHONIA REPENS 400 #1 1200 250 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA URSI 400 #1 1200 250 ~ FERNS 200 4" 600 70 ~ ACER GINNELA 10 - 10' 2000 150 ~ PONDEROSA PINES - 2 CONTORTED 1800 50 TOTAL 17710 2430 ~ 20140 I MISCELLANEOUS 2 BENCHES 6 FT 800 100 ll IRRIGATION 3000 1200 I 4 ENTRY TREES 500 2 ENTRY SIGNS 600 50 i LABELING 500 500 I CONTINGENCY 1000 TOTAL 5900 2350 8250 i DIRECTOR SALARY ~ CONSTRUCTION 7500 ~ DESIGN & PLANNING 2500 TOTAL 10000 II 10000 I TOTAL COST OF MEDITATION GARDEN I 81307 i I I I I I I ~I I 'I I I i i Ili I II I I I I I I - 1989 Vail Alpine Garden Annual Re ort p _ ~ ~ A ~ e--r• 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \ , ~i ~ ~ ~r \ , t . a A BRIEF HISTORY greenhouse next to the alpine display garden to house plants as they Originally organized as Friends of the Alpine Garden under the arrived. A staff of four and many, many volunteers worked under leadership of Marry )ones, the organization was incorporated in June the supervision of Marty Jones to install the irrigation system, 1985 as Vail Alpine Garden, Inc., a nonprofit Colorado corporation. prepare garden beds, and plant shrubs, trees, and flowers. Andrew In response to community support, the Town of Vail included a Pierce, "on loan" from Denver Botanic Gardens, served as planting site for the alpine garden in the Master Plan for Gerald R. Ford Park, coordinator, directing the planting of the perennial flower beds. The and Board members solicited funds from Vail and Colorado perennial garden was substantially finished by the beginning of residents, businesses, and foundations to build the garden. An August and dedicated on August 11 when Mrs. Ford officially alpine display garden was built in the spring of 1987 at the entrance opened her garden to the community. to the Ford Amphitheater, and the mountain perennial garden was built during the summers of 1988 and 1989. The garden was named FUNDRAISING The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens in 1988 in honor of the former First Lady and dedicated on August 11,1989, with a special community Fundraising efforts this year have been rewarded with over celebration. $140,000, with all our available funds going toward the completion Since its inception, the Vail Alpine Garden has raised more than of the mountain perennial garden. Financial statements of the $290,000, built the first two gardens of the Master Plan for the organization are available on request. Garden, and developed a horticultural program for the community. The Board is grateful for the substantial grant of $25,000 received this year from the Town of Vail and the gift of the entrance GOALS gates from the Vail Valley Foundation. Grants have been been received from El Pomar Foundation, the Curtis W. McGraw 'The Vail Alpine Garden was established to: Foundation, the Jerry Ford Invitational Golf Tournament, and the • Collect, preserve, cultivate, and display herbaceous plants, Eagle Valley Community Fund. trees, and shrubs, primarily native to the North American Rocky Deb Taylor chaired the annual plant sale on June 3, raising a Mountains record $1800. The sale has grown each year and is becoming an • Accumulate data on the growth, habits, adaptability, and needs anticipated spring event in the community. A sale of antique of plants in the collection botanical prints was again cosponson`d with the Turner Art Gallery • Provide an educational program that consists of a data base, a of Cherry Creek at the Vail Valley Arts Festival on July 8-9, but was library, a slide collection, a quarterly bulletin, guided tours, not successful this year as a fundraising event. It provided visibility seminars, and classes but no money for the Garden. • Introduce new plants into cultivation and encourage their use by demonstrating their habits and growth requirements PROGRAM • Provide a habitat for rare and endangered plant species • Encourage mom gardens and plantings in the Vail Valley and to "Vail: Valley of Lights," our annual winter competition, was beautify Vail's landscape in both summer and winter expanded this year at the request of the Vail Valley Foundation to • Provide a passive .~~.~.ational activity which will be a tourist include the entire Vail Valley from East Vail to Edwards in honor of attraction for Vail the 1989 World Championships. Garden Director, Marty Jones, presented three gardening THE CURRENT YEAR workshops from spring to fall to train volunteers in fundamentals of gardening and care of the alpine garden. THE BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDENS Panayoti Kelaidis gave a guided tour of the Rock Alpine Carden at Denver Botanic Gardens to a Vail Alpine Garden group in May. The first flowers appeared in the Alpine Display Garden in late Kathy Borgen and Lynda Goldstein hosted the group for a picnic March. Although covered again by a late snow, the garden was in lunch in the garden. full bloom by the beginning of May. The Spring Potluck Dinner on June 10 was held at the home of The focus this year has been the completion of the mountain Kathleen and jim Viele in Booth Creek. Andrnw Pierce presented a perennial garden, begun in August of last year. Construction program of 50-year-old Kodak slides with an ASA l0! resumed early in the spring with the erection of a temporary The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens entry in the Fourth of July _ _ _ _ . parade, organized by Cay Farrington, featured "The Betty Ford on Mount Goliath, had to be cancelled because of insufficient interest Alpine Garden-Home of World Champion Alpines". and lack of advance reservations. ~ - "Vail: Valley of Flowers" was expanded to include residential The Annual Meeting and Fall Dinner will be held on October 21 entries throughout the entire Vail Valley this year. The grand prize at the home of Cathie and Morgan Douglas in Vail Village. Marty J trophy was awarded to the garden of Bill and ]oye Miller in Eagle -Jones will present "A. Garden Retrospective;' showing slides he has Vail. First place winners of the silver trophies in residential and taken during the garden's development and construction. commercial classes included the gardens of Dick and Caroline ~ Strauss in West Vail, The Westwind, and The Village Center Mall. THE SEED EXCHAhIGE "Vail: Valley of Flowers-A Walking Tour of Vail," published to Vail Alpine Ganlen members could choose from among 48 promote The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and give further publicity species of plants in the seed exchange this past year. Seed was to past and praent winners of the competition, was again distributod to members under the direction of Committee Chair distributed during the summer at the information centers in Vail Shelley Irgens. Starting this fall, we will be including seed from our Village and LionsHead. own alpine display garden for distri i ution in the exchange. The Vail Alpine Garden was host to 125 members of the Garden Writers Association of America on July 21. They spent a day in the ~ Vail Valley as part of a 3-day rnnf ~,..ce sponsored by Denver 'j'j jE COMING 'YEAR Fundraising and construction It live r. ~ ~uced impressive results ~ ~ during the current year, and the Board has now focused its attention r/ ~ . _ on expanding and strengthening our~volunteer organization. A Board retreat for this purpose is planned for tactober 24 at the ~ Ili - Sonnenalp Hotel, facilitated by Dr. Charles Schwahn, organizational ~ ° consultant and former Superintendent of the Eagle County Schools. t_ ul ~ , Construction of t:he Betty Ford Gardens will continue next ~ summer, given the continued success{of fundraising efforts. The ~ ~ t[ ~ Board has given conceptual approval'ifor the design of a "secluded ~ meditation garden" immediately to the north of the r:.:...nial garden. ~i i Botanic Gardens. Mrs. Ford greeted the group on their arrival at the THANK YOU ICI Garden, members of the Vail Alpine Garden guided them on a walking tour of Vail, and they were the guests of Vail Associates for Many, many peoF~le have built The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens lunch at Spruce Saddle in Beaver Creek. Two major articles in and enable them to keep growing. Asi we dedicate the Gardens this Denver newspapers and TV coverage of the garden dedication on year, I would like to e~:press my appreaation for the speaal Channel 9 were a direct result of this visit. contributions of some of those people who have made the Gardens The highlight of the summer was the dedication of The Betty possible: ii Ford Alpine Gardens on August 11. Mrs. Ford and 300 people from • the creativity of our Garden Director, Marty Jones, in the design Vail and Denver officially opened the Gardens to the public in a and construction of the Gardens. i, c........ony threatened by rain. Don Simonton offered the invocation, • the strong support of Denver Botanic Gardens, most notably the paying tribute to the many memorial gifts that have helped to build experience and invalu~iblc help of Andrew Pierce. the Gardens. Helen Fritch and Marty )ones r+ecitod a brief history of • the dedication and hard work of our volunteers and staff the Vail Alpine Garden and recognized donations, grants, and members in planting and maintaining the Garden, with special volunteers that have made the Gazdens possible. Panayoti Kelaidis recognition to the worl~: this summer of Lynn Chapin, Gail Day, Eva presented greetings from Denver Botanic Gardens, and Mayor Kent C+tjen, Mary Pownall, rlancy Rondeau,~ Sandra St. John, and Pearl Rose spoke on behalf of the Town of Vail. A buffet supper was Taylor. ~ served under a tent next to the Gardens as the rain arrived. The • the ongoing support of our Boazd dedication and supper p.~..~1od the magnificent opening performance of the Bolshoi Ballet Academy presented by the Vail As we dedicate the Gardens, we also dedicate ourselves to its Valley Foundation. continuing development. Thank you to all who have supported The Because of the heavy construction schedule this summer, only ~Y Ford Alpine Gardens this year. Your suer..:: is building a one wildflower tour was scheduled. Unfortunately the trip, planned beautiful new garden fur the Rocky Mountains. for August ]9 to Mount Evans and the Denver Botanic Gardens trail ii ~ I . ::r. - 1 88-19 9 ...BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 9 8 . . , Helen S. Fritch Betty Ford'Honorary Directot - President of the Board ' :Helen S. Fritch, President Katherine S. 8... ~y_n, Vice President Septtrrrber 30,1989 ~ 1 6 Laura Oliver-Gutzel, Secretary ~ ~ i/!' ::James R. Stephenson; Titasurer ' .r,,,,..., ~ ,f~~ - Cissie Dobson . > ; . Robert Oliver ::.Maureen Shapiro r • ~ Rose Gillett >Andreew Pierce June Simonton Lynda Goldsfeiri Kathleen Viele _.4.1=L ~ Marty Jones. Garden Di>•ector I i VAIL ALPINE GARDEN, INC. OPERATING BUDGET YEAR ENDING 9/30/90 OPERATING INCOME 1989-1990 1989-1990 BUDGET YTD 7/31 MEMBERSHIPS & DONATIONS 10200 10752 IN-KIND DONATIONS 3500 5079 CORPORATE GIFTS 500 1050 FOUNDATION GRANTS 3000 2500 PLANT SALES 1800 1414 MERCHANDISE SALES 100 210 BENEFITS 1000 1920 OTHER REVENUE 2697 TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 20100 25622 OPERATING EXPENDITURES 1989-1990 1989-1990 BUDGET YTD 7/31 SALARIES * 2500 2083 LIABILITY INSURANCE 550 500 ADVERTISING 800 445 MEMBERSHIP FEES 50 49 OFFICE EXPENSES 600 920 POSTAGE 1100 814 PRINTING 4000 5723 DESIGN & ARTWORK 500 335 LEGAL & ACCOUNTING 600 170 TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT 500 353 VALLEY OF FLOWERS/LIGHTS 1600 1108 GARDEN SUPPLIES 2000 70 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 200 296 TELEPHONE 1000 380 UTILITIES 200 388 MISC. EXPENSE 500 2998 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 16700 16632 * 10% OF DIRECTOR SALARY & PAYROLL COST ALLOCATED TO OPERATING BUDGET Certified Public I?ccountant ° Vail, Colorado Vail Alpine Garden {A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) Financial Statements ~ September 30, 1989 i • {Unaudited) i I I~ I Vail Alpine Garden (A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) September 30, 1989 Table .of Contents Paae Accountant's Compilation Report ~ Financial Statements: Balance Sheet ~ Statement of Funds Activity and Balances 3 Statement of Changes in Cash Balances 4 Notes to the Financial Statements 5 . ROBERT C. KF_NNEY, P.C. ACCOUNTING AND TAX SERVICES THE MARKET PLACE 1 ' SUITE 240 TELEPHONE (303) 949-1015 EAGLE VAIL. CO P.O. BOx 1835 VAIL, CO 81658 March 3, 1990 Board of Directors Vail Alpine Garden, Inc. Vail, Colorado The accompanying balance sheets of Vail Atpine Garden, Inc. (a Colorado non-'profit corporation) as of September 30~, 1989 and 1988, and the related statements ~of fund activity and balances and changes in cash balances for the years then ended have been compiled by me. A compilation is limited to presenting ~in the form of finan- cial statements information that is the representation of management. I have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. l~~i~«~ Robert C. Kenney Certified Public Accountant Vail Alpine Garden, Inc. (A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) Balance Sheet September 30, 1989 and 1988 (Unaudited) 1989 1988 Endow- Operating Capital ment Operating Capital Fund Fund Fund Total Fund Fund Total Assets Current Assets: Cash 7,800 - 5,126 12,926 3,566 - 3,566 Pledges Receivable 3,306 6,044 - 9,350 1,200 37,850 39,050 Inventory 457 - 457 541 ~ - 541 Interfund Due To (From) 4,913 (4,913) - - 8,519 (8,519) - 16,476 1,131 5,126 22,733 13,826 29,331 43,157 Fixed Assets Alpine Display Garden - 28,474 - 28,474 - 28,019 28,019 Mountain Perennial Garden - 179,702 - 179,.702 - 41,798 41,798 Rock Alpine Garden - 6,333 - 6,333 - 6,333 6,333 Visitor Center - 1,287 - 1,287 - 1,287 1,287 Other - 1.465 - 1,465 - - - - 217,261 - 217,261 - 77,437 77,437 16,476 218,392 5,126 239,994 13,826 106,768 120,594 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities: Taxes Payable ~ 125 - - 125 588 - 588 Fund Balances 16,351 218,392 5,126 239,869 13,238 106,768 120,006 16,476 218,392 5,126 239,994 13,826 106,768 120,594 See accountant's compilation report and accompanying notes to these financial statements. -2- • - - ~ . IIi1 I Vail Alpine Garden, Inc. {A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) li Statement of Fund Activity and Balances For the Years Ending September 30, 1989 and 1988 {Unaudited) I I 1989 1988 Endow- Operating Capital ment Operating Capital Fund Fund Fund Total Fund Fund Total i Support and revenues: I Memberships and donations 10,621 35,907 5,000 51,528 7,755 31,1600 39,355 Contributions in kind 9,475 27,791 - 37,266 2,124 2;805 4,929 Foundation grants 3,176 22,250 - 25,426 1,000 20,~i250 21,250 Town of Vail grant - 25,000 - 25,000 - - - Benefits 871 - - 871 1,860 ~ - 1,860 Other revenue 2,407 - - 2,407 2,203 ~ - 2,203 Interest - 796 6- 802 - 1349 349 _ 26,550 111,744 5,006 143,300 '14,942 55,',004 69,946 I Expenditures: li Salaries, wages and related expenses 4,509 40,038 - 44,547 - 6,235 6,235 Insurance 2,178 - - 2,178 996 i - 996 Office 6,496 - - 6,496 203 - 203 Postage 1,039 - - 1,039 838 i - 838 Telephone 990 - - 990 175 I - 175 Legal and accounting 581 - - 581 98 i - 98 Printing 5;013 - - 5,013 4,793 - 4,793 Community beautification ii program 1,515 - - 1,515 - I _ - Garden supplies - 2,770 - 2,770 - - Garden equipment - 1,625 - 1,625 499 419 918 Construction - 59,953 - 59,953 - 23,532 23,532 Planting - 30,617 - 30,617 - 9,642 9,642 Miscellaneous 1,116 4,748 - 5,864 3,742 553 4,295 23,437 139,751 - 163,188 ~ 11,344 40,381 51,725 Excess (deficiency) of ~I support and revenues 1 over expenditures 3,113 (28,007) 5,006 {19,888) 3,598 14,623 18,221 Capitalized expenditures ~ - 139,751 - 139,751 - 40,381 40,381 Fund balances: I, Beginning of year 13,238 106,768 - 120,006 9,640 51,764 61,404 Fund Transfers - (120) 120 - - - End of year 16,351 218,392 5,126 239,869 1;1,238 106,768 120,006 . = i - See accountant's compilation report and ~i accompanying notes to these financial statements. i -3- I t Vail Alpine Garden, lnc. (A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) Statement of Changes in Cash Balances For the Years Ending September 30, 1989 and 1988 (Unaudited) 1989 1988 Endow- Operating Capital ment Operating Capital Fund Fund Fund Total Fund ~ Fund Total Cash - Beginning of Year 3,566 - - 3,586 7.529 - 7,529 Cash Provided By (Used for): Excess {deficiency) of support and revenues over expenditures 3,113 {28 ,007) 5,006 {19,888) 3,598 14,623 18,221 Pledges Receivable {2,106) 31,806 - 29,700 516 (23,641}(23,125) Inventory 84 - - 84 163 - 163 Interfund Balances 3,606 {3,606) - - (8,519) 8,519 - Alpine Display Garden - {455) - (455) - {1,750) {1,750) Mountain Perennial Garden -{137,904} - {137,904) - {38,132){38,132) Rock Alpine Garden - - - _ _ _ _ Visitor Center - - _ _ _ _ _ Other Fixed Assets - {1,465) - {1,465) - - _ Taxes Payable {463) - - {463} 279 - 279 Capitalized Expenditures - 139,751 - 139,751 - 40,381 40,381 Fund Transfers - (120) 120 - - _ _ Net Increase (Decrease) 4,234 - 5,126 9,360 (3.963) - (3,963) Cash - End of Year 7,800 - 5,126 12,926 3,566 - 3,566 See accountant's compilation report and accompanying notes to these financial statements. -4- • II I li ~ I Vail Alpine Garden, Inc. (A Colorado Non-Profit Corporation) Notes to the Financial Statements 1 For the Years Ended September 30, 1989 and 198811 {Unaudited) I II I I I Significant Accounting Policies II .The Vail Alpine Garden, Inc. is a Colorado non-profitll,corpo- ration, incorporated June, 1985, and is exempt under the provisions of• the Internal Revenue Service Code, S~,ection 501(C)(3), from Federal and State income taxes. I Fixed assets are stated at original cost or d~~nated valllue at the date of acquisition. Under the principles of Fund Accounting, no provision for depreciation has been calculated. 1 I Financial statements are prepared on the accrual Il~basis following the principles of Fund Accounting. 'I I I III I i I III - I I I I _ 'I I I III ~I I I II II I -5- II I I u ~aq:::: oo n _ ~9 J~ I ` ~ ~ ` 1 Spring 1990 Dear Friend, Think about it... "One day Vail will be as well known for its gardens in the summer as it is for its skiing in the winter." Sound impossible? Actually, we're well on our way to achieving this vision for Vail... with the building of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens in Ford Park and a community beautification program that encourages more people to plant more flowers in the Vail Valley. Summer visitors rave about our flowers already. We are building on that interest. And, if you saw the alpine garden at the end of last summer, you understand its potential as a summer attraction. The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens will contain four separate gardens when complete, each with a different focus on the Colorado Rocky Mountains. These gardens will be an asset to Colorado, not simply to Vail. Look at the master plan on the map in the enclosed brochure. In only three summers we have built two gardens, the Alpine Display Garden and the Mountain Perennial Garden, at a cost of over $200,000. We plan to continue our building program this summer with the Mountain Meditation Garden, budgeted at a little under $100,000. A Rock Alpine Garden and Visitor Center will complete the Gardens. Each phase will be built as we raise the money needed for construction. Who are we? N'e are Vail Alpine Garden, Inc., anon-profit community group organized for the purpose of building and maintaining an alpine garden in Vail. We also sponsor new ideas to promote our garden and attract visitors to the Vail Valley... A community beautification program... wildflower and photographic workshops... a community plant sale... gardening workshops... a computer data base with information about our high altitude plant collection... and more... We named our garden for Betty Ford to recognize the many contributions she has made to the Vail Valley. (over, please) o ` I ,i / ~ ` 1 i What will the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens offer visitors to Vail and Colorado? i A new cultural attraction in the Colorado Rockies, already a popular vacation destination. We are bringing the alpine flowers of the high country down into the Vail Valley where summer visitors can see them. A quiet retreat for more passive recreation in a community that is very active and sports oriented. A haven for endangered plant species. A place to show mountain residents what flowers will grow in their gardens. We want nurserymen to see these flowers, too, and begin to grow them for the general public. A place of beauty, a "jewel in the Rockies." But we need your help! ~ Support the Vail Alpine Garden and help us to finish building the Betty Ford Gardens in Ford Park. Add an extra gift to remember a special person or occasion. Flowers and trees are wonderful, living memorials. Volunteer some of your time. We need your special talents to help with community programs and to care for the gardens. Many of you receiving this letter have supported the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens in the past, and we are very grateful. We ask for your continued suppirt in 1990 to help us get the job done. Please give as generously as you can. Your contribution is fully tax deductible. It will be visible and appreciated in the Vail Valley for years to come. ~ Sincerely, ~ i~G/ / ~ Helen Fritch, President for Members of the Board of the Vail Alpine Garden ~ Betty Ford, Honorary Director Kathy Borgen Rose Gillett Andrew Pierc Cissy Dobson Lynda Goldstein Maureen Shapiro Gail Day Laura Gutzel June Simonton Helen Fritch Robert Oliver Jim Stephenson and Marty Jones, Alpine Garden Director VAIL ALPINE GARDEN, 183 GORE CREEK DR., VAIL, l~0 81657 (303)476-0103 ~ e" s/he master plan for the ° ~ ~ - _ W E L C O M E T O • Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ~I ' `Q ,~r ir. 'J he Betty Ford Alpine Gardens are being I ~ ~ developed by Vail Alpine Garden, Inc., a nonprofit is known the i ~ ~ 'Itl .l includes four smaller x world over as a ski resort, site 3 ~4 Colorado corporation founded in 1985 to build and Bett Ford gardens and a visitor center, v l ~ of the American Ski Classic fir ~ ~ F maintain an alpine garden in Vail. The Alpine Display m~~;. The Vail Alpine Garden offers mountain Alpine ~ and the 1989 World Alpine Garden, built in 1987, dis la s a P Y wildflower and photographic tours, gardening Ski Championships. variety of alpine and subalpine plants. workshops, a community plant sale, a wildflower Gardens But there is a summer side ~ The Mountain Perennial Garden, seed exchange, access to the plant collection data ~ ' ' ~ to Vail when the snow on / ~ built in 1988-89, demonstrates what base, and quarterly bulletins. ' " mountain slopes is replaced perennial flowers, shrubs, and trees can The organization also sponsors Vail: valley of , ~ Flowers and Uail: Vall o Li hts annual com et~t<ons ~ with a blanket of be grown in the mountain landscape. ~ f 8 P wildflowers and the town ~ that promote community beautification. ~ The Meditation Garden, beginning blooms with brilliant flowers construction in 1990, will offer a place for cGLDEN PEAK I PARKING PARKING ALLEV DPIVE / ~ i which thrive in bright sunshine MALAGA VAIL contemplation and passive recreation pS COVERED BAI~GE~ under Colorado blue skies. ~ ~ 1 ' The Rock Alpine Garden, final phase of ' Long recognised by summer ~ ~dETTr ~ ~ ~ this botanic garden, will display an extensive ~ Q PDAD NATUAE CF.NTF.P FDAD JI ALPINE visitors for the beauty of its collection of alpine and subalpine plants in . - AMPHITHEATER GARDENS flowers, Vail's image has been the varied landscapes of the Rocky Mountains. K~~'A P o R D PARK ' enhanced by the addition of ~ ~ Py SDD,H FRONTAGE p~.. ~ - J lease visit the gardens often during the & P a F CIL~E this high country botanic garden. Vail's lovely alpine garden is named , ~ . spring and summer. The flower displays ' change continually from week ~c~u can become a Vail Alpine Garden member ~ for Betty Ford inappreciation for ~ ~ _ and be a part of this exciting project. ~ ~ to week from snowmelt ~ ~ her many contributions to the Vail ~ - Send your tax-deductible contribution to: G,,~' 4' to snowfall. ~ , - ~ Valley. Located in Gerald R. Ford ry~ VAIL ALPINE GARDEN ~ - Park at an altitude of 8,200 feet, ~ ~ Next week it will be another 183 GORE CREEK DRIVE it is the highest public alpine ~ ~ _ VAIL, COLORADO 81657 ~~~:~garden... ~ ~ VAIL, COLORADO garden in the world. ~ . o . ~ P'~""lf" FUTURE VISITOR ~ ' ~ ~ CEN"TER _ _ • Rock ~ ~ . • • Alpine Garden . t'.: • ~ = tit r•-•. ~ Large rock and i' , • ' 1 water features and an ~ ~ .r. extensive collection of alpine ~J f ~ ` ~ • • • t' plants will display the varied 'r ' ` ~ landscapes of alpine and subalpine .t; ` a. regions. While the plants in this ' 1. ~ . . garden will come primarily from North • America, alpine plants from • , ~ ' _ - ~ . ~ mountainous regions around the world ~ ` will be represented in significant numbers. d ' • ~ ' ` The largest of the four gardens, it will Welcome " ~ include an Alpine House and Visitor Center. To Our Garden - ® _ _ _ _ ake a tour through the . MOLfntaln Medltatl0n GardeYl Betty Ford Alpine Gardens using this ' ~ _ . - : nand hi oso hical elements of map as your guide. The botanic gardens _ f ~ ~ Deng p p Chinese Zen gardens and Japanese moss gardens are here to help you learn more about the ~ ~ 1.5- • combine in this garden with plant materials and flowers, shrubs, and trees that grow in the ? ~ rock features of the Rocky Mountains. In the Rocky Mountains. ~ ' ~ ' is are seco n k . , : ; . oriental tradition, plan ndaly, a d roc Look also for new ideas to use in ~ and water features become focal points of the I landscape design: unusual flowers or • ~ garden. Individual features of the garden have shrubs...different textures and colors in plant O. ~ no symbolic I eaning, other than what you foliage...rock and water features that reflect the O ~ ~ ~ ~ choose to gi a them. The garden offers a place Colorado mountain landscape... : ~ ~ ~ ~ • of peace and tranquillity, a retreat in the Plant to s offer information about individual ~ ~ ~ fit" g ~ mountains for quiet contemplation. plant specimens. They identify plants by family, ~ ~ - ~ ' , ~ genus, species, common name, and place o f origin. • _ PLEASE DO NOT MOVE PLANT TAGS. \ J•..' ~l.• Mountain Perennial Garden , Built in 1988-89, out garden adapts the ~ O • `5'` GERALD R. FORD tradition of the English perennial garden to the " ' , • Rocky Mountains. The large collection of both ' ~ M P H I T H E AT E R traditional and unusual perennials, trees, © ~ and shrubs demonstrates the wide • - . , . variety of plant material that will ~ grow in the mountain landscape. ~ ' ti There are over 1500 varieties in • ' I,~'•` the garden: While plant collections - ~ : ~ ~^1~ are concentrated in beds, as marked • O .:~:O ir• _ . on the map, look for individual plant • ' ' t~ specimens scattered throughout the garden. _ ~ \ There are also rnllections of unusual conifers, shrubs, ENTRANCE Alpine Display Garden oriental r~rr~~. heathers, annuals, and biennials surrounding the garden. ~ Built in 1987, this garden displays on a small scale a vanity of alpine and subalpine plants. There are nearly S00 different varieties in four separate microclimates. 0 Primula Garden Q Peony Bed 0 The south, dryland bed, (i Oho gravel, 2096 loam, 1046 manure) © Silver Garden Q Water Garden contains plants from semiarid regions. © Mixed Perennial Beds 0 Iris & Daylily Bed Q The east and west cliff gardens (40~o gravel, 4096 loam, 1096 peat, 0 Woodland Garden 0 HOSta, Fern, and 1096 manure) provide habitatlfor alpine and subalpine plantings. 0 The north peat bed (80% (peat, lO~Yo bark mulch, and 1046 loam) is © Rose Garden Rhododendron Bed I home of the peat and cool lovers-rhododendron, primula, heather, HISTORIC and other members of the Eril aceae family. SCHOOLHOUSE O The woodland area (709611 am, 209'o peat, 109/o manure) contains Illustrations by Charmayne T. Bernhardt conifers, deciduous trees, and larger flowering perennials. ti '~3:.... .i, ~ f ~u tin VOLUME 4 Winter • 1990 NUMBER 2 Vail Alpine Garden: A Vision or the Future f "One day Vail will be as well known for its VAG Boazd members spent a day in late October gardens in the summer as it is for its skiing in the as guests of the Sonnenalp Hotel discussing the winter." This is the way VAG Board members mission and the future of the Vail Alpine Garden. summed up their vision of the future for Vail and the Dr. Charles Schwahn, former Superintendent of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens at their fall retreat. Fagle County Schools, acted as facilitator for the day- long session. Board members easily recognized their r immediate task: to build the Betty Ford Alpine "Z'.`.' ~ Gardens in Ford Park. But they also looked beyond. _5 ~ "Why an alpine garden for Vail?" "What about our goals for the future?" "Why are we involved?" These A ' were some of the basic questions Board members ~ ~ asked themselves as they focused on their mission. - What about some of their answers? They agreed that they wanted "to create and share a unique and beautiful garden in the Rocky Mountains..., to attract ' ij ~ ~ t. visitors to Vail during spring and summer months..., to educate our membership and the public about Nicole Wereheim, Betty Ford, Helm Fritch, and Dr. Ha6ert Wertheim alpine plants and p~c.c,...,ials that we can grow in the at the Va>7 Volley Citizen of the Year araard aerrnwny in December. mountains..., to encourage others in the Vail Valley to Helen Frltch Honored add to the beauty of our community." As for their involvement as Board members, they As the Vail Valle " r"'~ thoughts as: "we find fulfillment in Y our own gardens, and we want to share this joy of gardening with the community and with our Citizen of the Year visitors.... Webelieve that Vail is a special The honor of 1989 Vail Valley Citizen of the Year ~m~~'' and we share a strong feeling of was awarded to Helen Fritch, President of the Board service"° We have a shared vision of of the Vail Alpine Gan3en by the Dr. Herbert and what this garden can be for Vail and the Rocky Nicole Wertheim Foundation. Residents of Vail please see Vision, page 3 gathered to honor Helen on D.;.,.~..ber 26 at a Vail Public Labrary fundraiser. The~theim Foundation, based in Miami, Florida, is a nonprofit organization which supports worthy educational and community causes. The o~ < Foundation annually recognizes a resident of the ~ Vail Valley who has made a significant contribution ~ ~ in the area of arts, public service, envi.~.r..ent please see Fritch, page 3 Er°: . I ~ i Director's Notes By Marty Jones J ' ~ ~ t s"` Future Vision 1990 - f. ~ What lies ahead for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens? 1 What was a dream just a few years ago is now a reality. , .j What lies ahead for our future is now just a dream. Sometimes my dreams stay seem unrealistic, but in the _ case of the Garden they have proved to be very realistic. f; > f; . This is largely due to the continuing Burr..- 7 of the Board _ of Directors and our President, Helen Fritch. Without them , the r. ~.~ent garden would not exist and our future would , be in doubt. Honest communication, trust, and a shared ~ ~ " , ` i , . . vision has been a basic key to our success in the past and is ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ • the key our future. It has taken a dynamic, courageous, and Winter auw of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. hardworking group of r t..rle to get us where we are today. It ~I will take more of those qualities to reach our vision of involved, unf,,: b;.ttable. It is a lofty goal but definitely tom~.~.,.~v achievable. The difficulty of the challenge is part of the What is our vision of tomorrow? The obvious answer is exdtement, the reward immeasurable. Join me in the to complete the construction of the meditation garden, the exploration of unknown regions to go boldly where no one rock alpine garden and the visitor center. With these goals set has gone before, smirching out.new life forms with a mission firmly before us, most would be content to simply work of peace and knowledge. Beam me up, Helen! toward their completion. When the water begins to clear, I would like to start planning the development of the however, I guess I feel an overwhelming need to stir it up. "Southern Andean Collection." If you can offer the following, Maybe iYs like looking at the clouds in your coffee. The pl~se contact me at 949-6464. We needtravel t..r:.. lise, swirling forms leave much to the imagination. So here is my connections in Chile and A.b~..tina, reference books, a vision: botanist, a photographer and writer, camping equipment, Our rock alpine garden will provide habitat for alpine medical assistance, and most of all money ($50,000). plants from all over the world. While our emphasis will be on There are many ways to get involy red with our Garden, if North American plants, there will be room for a lot of others not in this particular project, in one of any other ways that as well. One group I am particularly interested in is plants of can give back to you much more than you put in. Join us this the southern Andes. This is a part of the world where the year in making one of our many visions a reality. climate is much like our own, complete with ski areas. These regions are not nearly as accessible as our own Rockies, VAIL ALPINE GARDEN.BULLETIN; however, and therefore are largely ur?explored, horticulturally speaking, The English have done some exploration there but Issue;~ 'Volume 4, Number 2 have not had a great deal of success in growing the Plants published quarterly by the Vail :Alpine Gan3e:ti, 183 Gore Creek from this dryland region. We, however, have a perfect climate l~nve, Vail, Colorado 81657,:and edited:by Helen S l;ritch and for these gems. With the climate, our garden, and the pi~ver, the 8ulletut is a benefit of memberslup'ln the Vail support, we have an ideal place to develop one of the finest Alpine Garden, a nonprofit Colorado corporation 'The Bulletu collections of southern Andean plants in the world, many of .:;:solic?is ~fc1es for publication about plants and gardening that which no doubt will be suitable for introduction into are of interest to ,its membership For further uiformation about cultivation. The development of such a collection would put :;:;:;the Vail Alpine Garden of to subnut an article, please write to the us in the horticultural forefront of the world. :address above or tali X303) 476-tf103 lisp this. We We need to do a number of things to a~......p 8t7~U need to establish sections with horticulturists in Chile, Helen Fritch, Deane Hall, Robert Oliver, Sydney Summers Argentina, and England, as well as anyone else who can assist , our efforts. We need to develop a library of references on the $OARU Op DIRECTORS plants of the area. Information is currently somewhat limited, 3'pod ~o~rey p,rector b .'Fntdi:`:>':>< ::><:>;>:?':>>:President::: <.; ution in this area. and we ma be able to make a contra a:•ielen; Y s to 'i:;` Vice President : w need ; ICatheru~e..;8oigen,; to lan and fund a series of collecting trap Finally, e p :..:....:.::.:.Secret . the southern Andes in a time frame of 1992-1995. i This would be the truly exdting part. An e..r:.:ition of jim Stephenson Treasurer this e, ~ Goldstein : Maureen Shapuo t5'P d PTOP~lY Planned and executed, could be the Garl L)ay Lynda . material for a National Geographic ,rt.:al, or at least a series Cissie'Dobson _ 1Zobert Oliver June Simonton of articles or a book. The benefit to the Garden of this kind of ~tose Gillett Andrew Pierce t Kathleen Viele ; effort would be immeasurable, the excitement for those ; GARDETV DIRER Y vn Marty Zones - 2 I vision, continued from page 1 extensive display of flowers in the Vail Valley. Community groups may adopt medians along the I-70 ,.,,..:dor to beautify • Mountains.... We simply love gardens." with flowers and L~..o. We will develop satellite gardens When it came to a Boazd vision of the future of the alpine around the area to both beautify and educate. Vail itself will gazden, a composite picture might read as follows: be viewed as a garden. "When we finish building the Betty Ford "Community members will recognize Alpine Gardens, our work will have just the value of flowers and gardens to our begun. As the highest public alpine ~ town and be eager to participate in gardens in the world, the Betty In e G these community activities. They Ford Alpine Gardens will not will arr.;,~ate the educational only be the prime horticultural • resources at our Visitors resource in the Vail Valley but ~ ~ Center. Our teaching staff a world center for the ~ ~ will talk with school dissemination of informa- ~ ~ children and hold learning tion on alpine plants. We sessions both at the will grow rare plants, ° Gardens and in the test plants at high ~ ~ schools. The Gardens altitude, and introduce ~ ~ ' ~ will be a gathering new species into culti- ~ ~ ~ ~ place for the vation. Information ~ ~ rnmmunity as well as and educational mat- ~ ~ visiting groups. Other erials will be available ~ mountain towns and to the public at our r ~ resorts will look to us Visitors Center and to _ ~ as a model for their the horticultural trade a. own communities. through our library and ~ ~ "Most of all, we will data base. We will ~ ~ enjoy the Betty Ford develop a national net- ~ Gan3ens and be work with other gazdens, ~ - , ~ enthusiastic in sharing and we will be the garden , QO this joy with the people think of for infor- ~.j .5,'~ community and with oration about high altitude ti visitors to the Vail Valley." gazdening. ~co When the day was over, "We will create a vision for b~ Board members were elated with our community of what it can be as fy aLe the glimpse they felt they had had we encourage the beautification of the ~~e a41 of the future. They have chosen this town. Community members and bust- ~f tho ace`' way to share their vision with you and to nesses will maintain and improve their own Se tjllrigS that ~ invite your participation by joining in to gardens and plantings, adding to the already create that future for the Gazdens and for Vail. Fritc6, continued from page 1 Helen and her husband, Bob, moved to Vail in 1974 when they purchased the Sitzmark Lodge. She served on the school and/or leadership. Helen was selected for her leadership in board for eight years, from 1977 to 1985, including four years developing Vail's Betty Ford Alpine Gardens. as president. The Wertheims own a home in Potato Patch and a ranch In 1985 Helen met Marty Jones, now Director of the Vail in Gypsum. "We enjoy supporting causes and individuals Alpine Garden by accident. Marty's truck was stalled on a who work to make the Vail Valley a better place;' Foundation return from Denver. "I gave him a ride and he began talking President Herbert Wertheim explained. "Vail is unique in its about his ideas for an alpine garden in Vail;' Helen recalls. location, its geography, and the caliber of its population. Vail Helen, Marty, and other gardening enthusiasts encouraged the has the potential to become a global gem, but it will take Town of Vail to in~.,.r...4te an alpine garden in the Ford Park leadership and rnmmihnent. We like to recognize those who master plan. display these qualities." Helen has served as President of the Board of Directors Helen commented, "It's a great honor, and it has focused since the Vail Alpine Garden was formed in June 1985. Under a lot of attention on the Garden." Mayor Kent Rose spoke for her leadership, Marty and the Board built an alpine display the Town of Vail, "We rnngratulate Helen on .,;,~~:ving this gazden in 1987 and a mountain r;..;...nial gazden in 1988 and award and arr.;..:ate the Wertheim Foundation's support of 1989. The gardens were named in honor of Betty Ford in 1988 Vail causes." Helen joins a distinguished list of past and dedicated last summer. redpients of the Vail Valley Citizen of the Yeaz awazd- We congratulate Helen Fritch on this awazd and thank her President Gerald R. Ford, George Gillett, Pepi Gramshammer, for leadership in our organization as we work to build the Paul Johnston, Rod Slifer, and jack Crosby. Betty Ford Alpine Gardens for all to enjoy. 3 i I Welcome and ~~Thank YOU~~ We also thank the following members who have renewed their membership for another year. To Our Members Bolat & Sohn. ~ ~.ber, Lolita Higbie, Sustaining Member Sustaining Members Diana Mathias We welcome the following new members who have made Ingemaz Bjork The Curtis W. McGraw donations to the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens during the fall. Mr. do Mrs. B.K. Horgan, Foundation, Charter Member Charter Members Kent do Martha Petrie Our full membership list is published in the summer Bulletin. B.A. Bridgewater, jr., Mr. d: Mrs! Andrew Pierce George C. Bush Patricia A. Lipman Sustaining Member Gordon d~ jDeb Taylor Mrs. William Harris, Patron Richard B. Neal Dan do Dorothy Burks Dr. James O. & Margaret W. Wall Edward L. King Rocky Mountain Chapter Eagle Valley Community Fund Kathy Wairen Robert L. Knows, Sustaining American Rock Garden Society Dick d~ Pinky Eber Mrs. Joan Whittenberg, Member Jaclyn & Sydney J. Ra~serrberg Jar Haber, Sustaining Member Contributing Member Judy Langer Anonymous, Charter Member Mr. do Mrs. Howard Head, Charter Members . Memorial and Honorary Gifts We gratefully acknowledge the following honorary and memorial gifts. For the Meditation Garden, in honor of Betty Ford i Mrs. Joan Whittenberg j An et ~.6. tree, in memory of Mrs. Betty Melzer & Dr. H.M. "Mac" Muffly In memory of lda & Carl Fritch and Helen do Lyle Spencer Dr. dr Mrs, Richard A, Flinn Elisabeth L. Fritch ~ Robert Melzer, M.D. In honor of Helen Fritch, Vail Valley Citizen of the Year Dr. dz Mrs. Frits Mijer Anonymous Mrs. Alice T. Muffly In memory of Lyn Youngstrom Dr. 3r Mrs. S.C. Perrefull Ken do Cindy Youngstrom Endowment funds, in memory of Henry S. Sharp ds Michael Lubchenko Mr. 6i Mrs. William B. Jones i Katherine S. B...br.. In honor of Peg Rosenquist from her frier?ds at Krismar For the Meditation Garden, in memory of Paul do Awana Collies john Q. Adams, III Susan Knopf Rev. do Mrs. Donald C. Simonton Susan E. Allen Ramsey Laursoo In memory of Joanne Hill Dave Alm Jack Lee Max Garrett Shawna Casteel Claudia Mayer Manzanares Janice M. Ciampa-Bauer Karla Callas McCulloch Elizabeth Cochrane Frederick & Susan Motschman I want t0 join the VAIL ALPINE GARDEN. Linda Commito Susan J! Pinkham j. Pete Edrington Pamela~Saden My check is attached for membership at the level indicated Becky Elizondo Kim Mulder Schramm (donations to the Vail Alpine Gazden aze tax deductible): Brett Fishman Denny Sobke [ J Annual Memberships: Carol Anderson Higgins Doug Stadnyck [ ] Patron $1000 Pat Horrigan Karen A. Volt [ 1 Supporting 500 Kathryn M. Jensen Pamela;Webber [ J Contributing 250 David Juell Bill Willing [ ] Sustaining 100 Kro KroPf Gail Wurdeman [ ] Family/Dual 40 P [ j Individual ?5 celebration of their wedding in The Betty Foni Alpine Gardens, on [ ] Senior/Student 20 A A hur &~Anna Kleimer ~ [ ]Charter Membership $2500 Perennial flowers, in memory of Mrs. Joseph Glee dhill (maybe paid over a 3-yeaz period) Mrs. H. M. Muffly Payment dates and amounts: InM ~ ~INrs ~ ~r Robinson Lamb r~- 1990 Seed Exchange Enclosed is my check payable to the Vail Apine Garden. i Participation in the annual Seed Exdiange is one of the Name benefits of membership in the Vail Alpine Garden. Members Addra~ may order up to 20 packets of seed for the cost of postage and handling and additional packets of seed at a nominal price. City State. Zij+ An order form for the 1990 Seed Exchange is enclosed with ph~e this issue of the Bulletin. Please return the form by April 1. .The Seed Exchange tJr~.~.tes under file chairmanship of Please send to: Vail Alpine Garden Shelley L~;...s, who has been busy cleaning seed in r'• ~raration for your orders. This is the first year that seed for 283 Gore Creek Drive the exchange has been harvested from our alpine display Vail, Colorado 81657 g~~ in Ford Park ~ 4 I Vail Va11 ey of Lights Honorable Mentions went to one Vail Place, The Doubta.:~, The Lodge at Vail, Colorado Insight, The Lodge at • Lionshead, The Tivoli Lodge, The Christiania, Carriage Rides ~ Recognizes the Beauty of Vail, Tunber Ridge, and The Inn at Vail. In the shops and restaurants category, Gold Of Vail Of Holiday D ecoxations fust prize; tied for second was Gorsuch Ltd. and The Seasons; and Manor Vail took third. Honorable Mentions included. The Ruckshack, Cyrano's, and The Gold & Vail Valley of Lights, our annual 'tivinter landscape" Silversmith of Vail. competition, recognizes the efforts of businesses and residents Keehn Kennedy and Chris Beda were first place winners to beautify the community with holiday lights and in the residential division; Jeffery Cross took the red ribbon decorations. Maureen Shapiro, Events Chair, again di.;,.6:~ for second place, and Nancy Lipsky's home was third. An the contest. Honorable Mention was earned by Chip Jones, and This is the third year of the contest which expanded to a recognition was given to the residences of Donald Marks and valley-wide competition last year as part of the celebrations Herman Staufer. surrounding the World Alpine Ski Championships. The Vail V1Tnners of the Western Division of the contest were Alpine Garden r.r.,~ented the announced at the event this year in ` ' Avon/Beaver Creek coo tion with the Vail ~ p P~ Christmas'Iiee Lighting. and Avon/Beaver Creek ~ The winner of the business Chambers of Commerce. y category was Kiva at Beaver Our special thanks go to ~ ,a. Cree15; second place went to Patrick O'Brien and The Ace ~ the Town of Avon; and Hardware Store who ~ 1 ,±~p third place was Arrowhead continue to sponsor both our at Vail. Among residential summer and winter contests - ~ ~ entries, Stephen and Patti through their awan3s of gift Warren of Lake Creek certificates to top winners. earned first place; Dennis Prizes were awarded at - ~ ~ Paulin of Singletree took each end of the valley to _ . ' second; and Craig and winners.among hotels and . Ginny Snowden of Eagle- commercial building, shops ~ Vail were an impressive and restaurants, and T7rc Plaza Lodge, a aecorrd place w:.., a among hotels a»d ..,,,..„arrial buildings. third. Honorable Mentions residential entries. All were given to the DelBosco winners received prize ribbons; top winr?ers also .:.;:ved gift Family of Eagle-Vail, Mr. and Mrs. Phil Smiley of Beaver certificates from The Ace Hardware Store; and first place Creek, and Robert Adams of Beaver Creek. winners received engraved silver bowls to keep until next The Vail Valley of Lights committee consisted of Mai.. year's contest. Shapiro, Helen Fritch, and Gail Day from the Vail Alpine Awazds for the Vail Division of the competition were Garden, Cindy Russell of the Vail Chamber of Commerce, and presented at the Vail Christmas Tree Lighting ..,:..~...onies in Lisa La France of The Avon/Beaver Creek Resort Association. both Vail and Lionshead. Outstanding among hotel and Judging this year's contest were James and Tommie Campbell, commensal buildings was Vail Ski Rentals, taking first place Beth Cooke, Susan Frampton, Eric O'Keefe, Sheila and for the second year in a row; tying for second were The Plaza Richard Norris, Paula Palmateer, Marcia Sage, Diane and John Lodge and The Westwind; and The Bell Tower Building was Slevin, Deb Taylor, and Kathy Viele. Advance Orders for Plant Sate, June 2 Secret Lives of Mountain Wildflowers In the middle of a snowy winter, it may seem awfully Dr. David Inouye, Director of the University of Colorado early to be thinking about our annual spring plant sale. The Mountain Research Station in Nederland, will share slides sale is scheduled for June 2, the first Saturday in June, in the and delve into the secret lives of our brilliant wildflowers as Safeway parking lot. part of the Adventure Speaker Series 1990 presented by the Last year we had a small number of gardeners who made Vail Public Library. Intricate life histories of flowers, large purchases of plant material or would have done so if we population biology, pollination, and their fascinating could have filled their orders. Tf you would like a large order interaction with insects will be discussed. of petunias or geraniums of a special color, for example, or if The Mountain Research Station is devoted to there are special bedding plants or perennials that you would advancement of study of high mountain ecosystems and like us to order for you, please make a phone call to Deb processes. It supports research in biology, geography, and Taylor, Plant Sale Chairman, at 949-1363 or Helen Fritch at the geology. VAG office, 476-0103. We will certainly be happy to The presentation will be given on April 5 at 7 p.m. in the accommodate your special order if we can get the plant Vail Public Library Community Room. For information about material through our suppliers-just let us know in time. other programs in the Library series, pl~se call 479-2183. 5 i I Lookin Ahead to Spring this summer, for the first time on a scheduled basis. In July or \ f Plants g he dormant for the winter, but the VAG Board early August we will take a wildflower tour above treeline to Y ~ see alpine plants in their native envi..,.,..,ent~. is busy planning spring and summer events and activities. ~ Look for more details and specific dates in the spring issue of the Bulletin. The Betty Ford Alpine Gardens will offidally open on ' ~ F ,ate ~ 5 ~ . ` May 1. Expect the first blooms in eazly to mid April, with " ~ ~ + ~ portions of the Gazden in full bloom in eazly May. Last yeaz the first blooms arr~red March 25 during a warm spell that ~ . * a 1 n~ `.i~~,~..:~ • ~a' xt was followed by another blanket of snow. ~ - Gazden Director Mazty Jones will conduct a spring ~ ~ ~ s , : ~ ~ ' workshop (and continuing education) on planting and ~ ' 4` ~ t- gardening techniques for our volunteer gardeners and others in the community who are int~.~ted in learning more about ~ caring for a gazden. i The Denver Botanic Gazdens will hold their annual plant sale May 11-13. We recommend a trip to Denver for the The phlox in the Alpine GdrAen w~l 6e in bloon 6efon' we know it! event, especially for alpine plants, unusual perennials, and i perennial herbs which can be planted at that time in the Vail "A Garden Party in Ford Park" in midsummer will Valley even though we are not yet frost free. The Vail Alpine benefit the Vail Alpine Gazden and enable~us to expand the Garden plant sale will be held June 2, closer to the planting alpine gazden, maintain the existing gazden, and continue our ; time for annuals at our altitude, and will offer annuals and community beautification programs. The iBoazd plans to stazt perennials, bedding plants, and hanging baskets. construction of the next phase of the Gardens in late summer Our traditional spring and fall potluck dinners allow us to following a spring and eazly summer fundraising campaign. renew friendships and talk about our plants and gardens. Of course, concun~ent with all of these activities and We will again offer a field trip to the Denver Botanic ~r~.ial events will be our ongoing enjoyment of the Betty Ford Gardens in May to see the Rock Alpine Garden in full bloom, Alpine Gardens and their changing IIoralj displays throughout and we will conduct tours of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens the summer season. We hope that you will join us. i Vail Alpine Garden i Non-P~fit 183 Gore Creek Drive i vs. Postage Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ PAID ~ Permit No. 31 Vail, Colorado i i I ~ i\ 1 I . ~~l` ~ i i ~ i i You may retain this sole of form for your records. ~ ' 1990 Seed List ~ ; Uail Alpine Garden Vail Alpine Garden ~ 1. Anacydusdepressus 2. Androsace sarmentosa var. chumbyi 3. Aquilega bertolonii X 1990 Seed Exchange ~ 4. Aquilegia caerulea (Rocky Mt. columbine) Order Fo~u~ ~ 5. Aquilegia flabulata 6. Aquilegia saximontana 7. Calceolaria biflora Please endow $1.00 to rover osta and adca n ~ 8. Cerastium alpinum vas: lantanum P ge P gl g 9. Chrysanthemum sp. costs. Members will .~...4:ve 20 packets of seed at no charge. ~ 10. Dianthus nitidus If you want to order more than your allotment, please add ; 11. Dianthus paronius 50 cents per packet. All seed orders must be received by ~ 12. Dianthus glacialis ssp. gelidus April i. ; 13. Dodecathuem alpina Circle your seed choices by number below Please circle ~ 14. Drabs hispanica your first choices in RED. Quantities of some varieties may ~ 15. Dracocephalum botryoides be limited. ~ 16. Dracocephalum grandiflonum 17. Erigeron elegantulus 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ~ 18. Gentians acaulis 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ; 19. Gentians paradoxa 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ~ 20. Gentians lino onnata 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ~ 21. Geranium cinereum var. subcaulescens 22. Hymenoxys grandifIora (alpine sunflower) 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ~ 23. Iris chrysographys 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ; 24. Iris setosa canadensis Q 25. Iris setosa nana 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ~ 26. Mimulus cupreus 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 27. Minuarta kashmirica 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 28.Oenothera acaulis (evening primrose) 29.Oxytropis lambertii (Lambert's locoweed) 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ~ 30.Oxytropis sericea 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 31. Penstemon hallii 100 101 ~ 32. Penstemon hirsutis pygmaeus 33. Penstemon kunthii 34. Penstemon virens 35. Phacelia sericea (purple fringe) NAME ~ 36. Polemonium viscosum (sky pilot) ~ 37. Potentilla verna Hans ADDRF~~ ; 38. Saxifraga garnet 39. Saxifraga sempervivum 40. Sedum lanceolatum 41. Semiaquilegia ecalcarata ~ 42. Soldenella sp. Amount enclosed: ~ ~ 43. Townsendia grandiflora Please tear off this side of the form and mail it together with appropriate amount (see shove) for postage and additional Seed list contributed by Mojmir Pavelka, Czechoslovakia seed packets to: 44. Acantholinum sp. Shelley Irgens ; 45. Campanula bornmuelleri Seed Exchange Chairman ~ 46. Campanula coriacea Vail Alpine Garden ~ 47. Drabs sp. 183 Gore Creek Drive 48. Hemerocallis citrinum var. vespertina Vail, Colorado 81657 ~ 49. Ranunculus lyallii Seed list contributed by Inb~.~.,ar Bjork, Sweden ; 50. Achillea clavennae ~ 51. Aethionema chistosum ; ~ 52. Alyssoides utriculata 53. Anemone x lesseri ; 54. Armeria caespitosa x labradorica ? (F2 hybrid) 55. Artemisia pedemontana ssp. assoana ' 56. Drabs dedearia v zapateri 57. Globularia pseudonana 58. Leontopodium nivale ; 59. Machaeranthera pattersonii 60. Meconopsis grandis ; 61. Potentilla nitida 62. Silene colorata (Collected on Crete in Apri11989) ; Seed list contributed by Dr. Pavel Slaby, Czechoslovakia 63. Androsace pyrenaica ; 64. Aquilegia akitensis 65. Aquilegia cazorlensis ; 66. Arenaria blephardphylla 67. Arenaria polaris 68. Delphinium bicolor 69. Delphinium decorum 70. Delphinium menziesii ; 71. Dianthus aricuIaris 72. Dianthus scardicus ; 73. Drabs cappadocica 74. Drabs cretica ; 75. Drabs haynaldu ; 76. Drabs paysonii 77. Drabs praealta ; 78. Inaba sakuraii ~ 79. Drabs sphaeroides ssp. cusicuii 80. Dracocephalum ruyschiana 81. Edraianthus caricinus ; 82. Edraianthus pumilio 83. Edraianthus tenuifolius 84. Erigeron rte. ~grinus ; 85. Erigeron poliospermus 86. Erigeron pumilis ; 87. Gentians verna 88. Globularia repens 89. Globularia trichosantha ~ 90. Globularia willkommii 91. Hymenoxys richardsonii 92. Lewisia longipetala 93.Onosma albo-roseum ; 94. Polemonium mellitum 95. Rhodiola rhodantha ; 96. Saponaria pumilio 97. Saxifrage burserana ; 98. Saxigraga sempervivum 99. Scutellaria prostrate ; 100. Townsendia f~....osa 101. Townsendia jonesii You may retain this side of form for your records. TIMOTKY E WIRTH a"MEO sEnv~cas CO~DRwoo a' ewN~~No ~ euoct* ENERGY ?NO LVL ` L HaTURa~ aE50upC£s WASHINGTON. OC 20510-0603 August 10, 1990 Mr . ,Tim Scherer Regional Administrator, Region 8 Envizonmental Protection Agency One Denver Place Denver, Colorado 80202-2405 Dear J31n: As a follow up to mp earlier correspondence on this issue, z understand that cleanup efforts at the Eagle Mine Superfund site are ongoing, but have still not resolved community concerns. Releases of cvntam~.nated water are continuing to flow into the Eagle River from various locations around the mine site creating enviwonmental degradation and potential health threats to the surrounding communities. This suggests that the Eagle Mine Remedial Action Plan (RAP), entered into by the Colorado Department of Health, Paramount Communications Inc., and its general contractor, tames and Moore, may be inadequate. Specific continuing pollution probl~as include heavy metal pollution releases from the old roaster tailings piles and other elder tailings piles. Under the RAP, these old piles were removed and Consolidated. at a "New Tailings Pile°. Additionally, Paramount was required to construct an intercept system to collect seepage from the residual material at these old locations. I am concerned that these actions have inadequately contained and controlled releases from the old waste pile sites. I IInder the RAP, material from the old tailings piles are to be consol~.dated, de-watered, and then capped with a soil cover. ' The piles wer® consolidated at the "New Tailings Pile". However, the contrr?atoz failed to de-water at th® proper time resulting in leaks of contaminated water into the Eagle River. Add~.tionally, the material from the old taS,].ings piles was not thoroughly cleaned and the soil cap has still not been constructed. The contractor hag only agreed to treat the water from this tailing pile for one year which may not be adequate to solve serious long-tet'm contamination problems. Contaminated water has also leaked from the m:.ne itself. Watfl~ was pumped back into the mine and the contractor has attempted to. plug a number of 1Qaks,. These efforts have been unsuccessful and mere ~,eaks have been discovered. Con9equently, significant amounts of polluted water continue to escape from the mine. 117* rfNNOY~vANU STNIET X00$ Mw~N IITAp~t !70 N TEJOk ST UNITED LANK !{UILCINO DlNVl11. CO 6020 ONAND JUNCTION, CO 0~70~ DYiTE t0i ET?+ ANO MA1N 3T. 30S/fel~1000 JO~r24E-80A~ COLOM00 SogiN08. CO eoo0t CUITE •10 1~vesa.sel~ rueeLO. eo ~tooa 11!/lsi•1~~7 zOd b~~ ~ ti ~ O Z 06 •80 i i . ~ Page Two • August 10, 1990 I Mr. Jim Scherer Since these leaking problems may persist over time,lthe water in the mine may have to be pumped out and treated. ~ I Additionally, to protect against groundwater contamination, extraction wells may need to be installed to pump and treat the contaminated groundwater. j I In light of these continuing pollution problems, I 'suggest that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exercise fits authority under the Clean Water Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA}Ito insist that Paramount engage in more complete; permanent, and effective clean-up efforts. j I am concerned that these continuing releases constitute ongoing Clean Water Act violations. Immediate enforcement efforts under the Clean Water Act would force Paramount to more fully address leaching and seepage problems inherent in its current cleanup program. Additionally, the continuing releases and surrounding water contamination may warrant the use of CERCLA emergency removal authority to require the construction of a permanent water tr®atment facility at the shine. The water quality problems this mine presQSZts to the Eagle River and surrounding communities are serious. The residents of Minturn, Colorado are very concerned about the cleanup program for this troubling site, and I eat anxious to ensure that the full weight of federal environmental laws-are brought to bear in corzectinq th• pzoblem. 2 appreciate your attention to this matter and please keep me informed of your aetion~. With best wi,hes, Sincerely yours, ~ I T~.mo y E . Wirth ccs Dr. Tom Vexnon, Colorado Department of HAalth TEAT/dy I ~Od U~I~i Zti~Ol 06 ~~l '80 . ~ 990 t - RECD AU G 2 01 """'~'~f frnirt thr 6'~{:rt~• Rr;;cr .'~nhnna! Fnrrst, U.5.L}.A. F~rrst ~rrvtee', Uid Fe'd:'rnl L':u(clru,~ "1m" P.O. Box 9~3, GlrN~c'ood S{~rir,75, CO F]60' .~~~r' ~ (3031 9-F~-2.i21 i.. ~ ~ J~ - ® ~ I2•L*SET1IATE P.ELEASE ~a~: '.J ~C/ fcf L]!a Or,Q SfI; 1R~ YP9~'tl' CONTACT: Bill Stood (827-5715) - Tim Grantham (827-5715) ASPE.\' 21.\GER D15TRICT Z 1o iti'. fi::::: v::.. C~~''°'~ The Holy Cross Ranger District of the Sdhite P.iver ~303r 9~.-3i~~ National Forest is currently in the process of bL:1-\"co rte;.\"GLr~ D/sT^%cT reviewing motorized and non-motorized travel ~'I ;i":.' . _=os 3'' management on Forest roads and trails throug :out r3~}~~ S,'o-r~:~ the District. The objective of the review is to deteraine if travel management regulations DILLO.\' R.~\'GEP, D157RICT Currentl heir. followed are ade uatel meetin^ .-~R4P.-iH0 ~:-iTIJ SAL FOREST y S Q y b :~~r.':: ;i:e/ cr~::r/ the intent of the G'hite River National Forest Plan °.O.F:.rc:" and the needs of recreation users. Several ,J,,;,;~;.;~:,_, changes have been proposed in areas where problems have occurred in the past. Before a decision is E.-1GLE R.~.\"GER DISTRICT made on any changes, the Forest Service would like it: Bas :'J cn <-:;; to hear from anyone who has comments about the management of trails and roads on the District. This process will culminate in the printing of a HOLD" CRO: R.~.\"GER DI_TRI~T new travel nap containing travel regulations that ~ - = ~.r will be available for distribution in 1991. ....:1~.. L~ Some of the proposed changes being considered RIFLE R.~.\G:; DI>TR1~7 are: The newly constructed Minturn Trail will be ~``JY shown on the travel map as closed to motorized use :~r;l etcept for snowmobiles . The Humper~•ille road off Shrine Pass will remain open to the ridgetop and ~O1'l:l~ rya.\I:ER D1~TR1~'T t closed beyond that point. ?lost roads beyond the Fowler-Hilliard but would be closed allowin¢ one ''D"--'' road to remain open to provide for motorized travel on the west side of Ptarmigan Hill. The `,~:,,,:a,~ Peterson Gulch road would remain open only if the lower portion of the road, flooded by recent ;U`} S - more - i heaver activity, could be realigned or elevated through olunteer r ~ efforts. The recently constructed Piney P,oad connectingithe P,ed " ~ Sandstone P.oad with Muddy Pass will be added to the travel map and shown as opened to motorized travel. The Colorado Trail will be added to the map and shown as closed to motorized travel. P.oads on Meadow Mountain would be shown as closed to motorized use except for snowmobiles. This would prohibit motorized use on Whiskey Creek Trail where a substantial amount of resource damage is occurring presently. A discrepancy between several maps will be corrected to indicate that the Two Elk Trail is closed to motorized use. The Forest Service is also considering opening old Highway 6 from Core Creek Campground to the turnaround (lover end of the Vail Pass bike path) in~the winter only to provide more and better opportunities for cross countrq skiing. This would be done only if a suitable means of plowing the road could be obtained. Further information on these proposals can be obtained by contacting the district office. In addition to soliciting public comments on these proposed changes to travel management, the Holy Cross Ranger District is also seeking public comcaent relating to the expansion of foot and bike trails at Vail and Beaver Creek Ski Areas. Vail Associates, Inc. is proposing to expend the multi-use trail system by improving and upgrading existing paths and constructing new trails to connect the existing ones. New trail construction would involve dozing 8-12 foot side trails maintaining suitable grades and alignments to pro~ide for safe use. All disturbed areas would be revegetated and layout of new trails and right-of-way clearing would be done in such a manner as to minimize the visual impact. A map showing the existing trails and proposed expansions is available for review at the HolyiCross Ranger District office. Anyone wishing to provide comments on the proposed changes to travel nanageWent or the hiking and bike trail expansion proposed for Vail and Beaver Creek Ski Areas should contact Bill Nood, District Ranger, or Tim Grantham of his staff, at 401 Y.air., Box 190, Mintiurn, CO 51645 or call 303-827-5715. _ # I I I I RECD AUG 161990 POPHAM, HAlK. $CHNOBRlCH 6 KAUFMAN, I.TD. . $400 ONt TI~AOR CLNTCR X200 4CVCNTl:CNTM STRt:tCT DENVER, COLORApO eo2oa TLLCINON6 fatal e?e?a-ftaO ~ X300 ?~?tw .iA/~YY AWCA •tt.sCO?iC! ei0i: Ni•ses.? iii lWbtw 1~~ Z;T RC .e'f MINNEMOLIS. MN 56402 -CSC?wQN! AND TC~;(,OMCR - +e~si ]]]•~A00 eiuRe a00 LOUTSf ISOO w t;TRCR w. vt W~+~"eeNGTON. D. G 2003a August ~ 3 ~ 19 9 O -eu?..e.+e egos, w-ssoo K:tCOhCrs fLOi! 6C0~]~8 Colorado Association of Ski Towns . Mr. Joseph Fitzpatrick, President ' P.O. Drawer D ' Mount Crested Sutte, Colorado 82225 QQ Committee Boa 739 Frisco, Colorado 80443 RE: wilderness Reserve Rights: Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick and QQ'Members: Last week, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided that the Sierra Club brought its wilderness reserve right suit against the Forest Service too soon. As you recall, the Sierra Club sued the Forest Service in 1984 for failure to claim wilderness water rights in Colorado water courts, which resulted ' in a Finding by Judge Kane that Congress had intended to include water rights is wilderness resezvatiaas and that the Forest Service should apply for water rights. The case was then appealed by the Forest Service to the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the Court's decision on the case should be delayed until there is a more imminent threat to wilderness water values. Because no water project poses an immediate threat to wilderness rights, the Court avoided ruling on the merits of the case. The Court did~12~, contrary to public opinion, cast any doubt on wilderness water rights. The decision indicated that a future d3~,N 3~I-:iSHd ldGb ~ L t : g t ~ 6 £ i ~~~~y - - I Colorado Association of Ski Towns 4Q Committee August 13, 1990 ~ . Page Z i 1 court could review the Forest Service s failure to act to claim water rights "in those situations where the agency's iForest Servicel conduct cannot be reconciled with the [Wilderness) Act's mandate to preserve the wilderness character of the wilderness areas." I I Please feel free to call if you have any questions. . i i very truly yours, ~ ~ ~ I Barbara J. Green ZHJG.349/dd ~ i I I i I I I i I i I i I I . i i I i I d3t~1J3~7-;~1~~Hd WG~~ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - £00 3~dd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - ,r, 1~ ~ To: Ron Phillips ~ , From: Shelly Mello Re: Census Date: August 10, 1990 On July 30, 1990 we received a response to our letter from the Washington, D.C. Census Bureau via Senator Bill Armstrong. The letter addressed some of the concerns which we had in regards to the enumeration process in general, however in my opinion it did not address the issues concerning the mixups which took place initially with the mailing of the forms and the door to door enumeration process. Currently I am awaiting the arrival of the Postcensus Counts. Upon receipt we will have 15 days to review the information. At this time, we have the ability to dispute the Census Bureau numbers should we feel that there are discrepencies. I have contacted Mark Hellfritz at the Regional Census Bureau in Lakewood and his response to our concerns is to wait for the Postcensus numbers and dispute them should we find that in fact they are wrong. At that point, the Census Bureau reviews our claims and decides whether the numbers are in fact wrong. Should the Census Bureau agree with our discrepancies they will adjust the numbers, however should they disagree the only recourse we will have at that point is to file a lawsuit against the Census Bureau. WIWAM L ARMSTRONG ~ ' I a'. ~niteii ~tate~ senate ~ 1 WASHINGTON, DC 20510-0602 ~ I I I I July 30, 1990 i I The Honorable Rent Rose ~ Mayor of Vail 75 South Frontage Road I Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Rose: I I I enclose the response I received from the Census Bureau regarding the concerns expressed in your earlier letter. I hope the information is helpful. I I Best regards. ~ S' ce ely W L. s g WLA/cr ~ Enclosure i I I I I I I I I I 1~a or ' aJ UNITEi~ STATES Df~AfATMENT OF CDMMEACE t BuPEau of the Census ~ Washington, D.C. 20233 l 1' `~''~+ns ~ ~ -n -I OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR lY. JUL 2 5 1990 . 1 Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515-0603 Dear Mr. Campbell: Thank you for your correspondence on behalf of Mayor Kent R. Rose regarding the Census Bureau's enumeration of Vail. To help ensure a complete enumeration of Vail's seasonal population, Mayor Rose suggests that we resume local census operations in December 1990. We will not agree to this request, since we believe the application of existing census procedures will yield an accurate count of those persons usually residing in Vail. The Census Bureau decides who to count in the census on the basis of "usual residence." We define usual residence as where a person lives and sleeps most of the time. Usual residence is not necessarily the same as legal residence, voting residence, or even the place where a person is found on Census Day. These enumeration and residence concepts provide the basic framework for meeting the goal of the census--to ensure the most accurate counts possible for all geographic areas. The determination of usual residence, however, is made by the respondent, not the Census Bureau. We realize that due to travel, work patterns, and other reasons, people are not always at their usual residence on Census Day, April 1, 1990. We designed the census questionnaire to allow persons staying at a temporary address the opportunity to report what they regard as their usual residence. For example, a person living in Florida on Census Day may report an address in Vail as his or her usual residence. When this occurs, we count that person in Colorado at the usual address. Whether all persons who reside in Vail only from some time in December through early April (or before) would ' regard Vail as their "usual residence" is speculation. Beyond the initial enumeration phase, we also designed operations to improve those initial counts. A "Were You Counted?" campaign, currently in progress, enables persons who believe they may have been missed in the initial phase to respond to an abbreviated census questionnaire, by mail or toll-free 800 telephone service. Our Field Follow-up activity includes procedures for verifying the status of any address recorded as vacant during earlier census operations. Later this year, Postcensus Local Review provides another opportunity for dialogue with local officials concerning the completeness of census housing and group quarters population counts. i i i I r Honorable Ben Nighthorse Campbell I 2 P In summary, we recognize that in resort areas like Vail-hand in many other situations--a person's residence on Census Day may not be the same as his or her "usual" residence, and we buill't our census procedures to accommodate this possibility. In the event someone is missed during the initial enumeration, later census operations provide a safety net. Our Denver Regional Census Center's willingness to work with you in beginning the initial enumeration phase a week early should not be taken as implying that to do otherwise may produce an inaccurate enumeration of the City of Vail. To the contrary, we are confident that our overall census design will produce the most accurate data possiile for - Vail, the remainder of Colorado and the Nation. We appreciate your continued support of our Nation's Bicentennial Census. i I Sincerely, I signed Barbara Everitt Bryant Barbara Everitt Bryant Director Bureau of the Census I i - ~ I I I I i i i I I i I i i I i i I ~ , AGENDA ~ REGULAR MEETING ~,~1. VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1990 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Regular Meeting - Call to order 3:00 PM 2. Approval of Minutes: August 8, 1990 (see attached) 3. Financial Report (see attached) - Jones 4. Preliminary Budget Discussion - Jones 5. Sub Committee Reports a) General Recreation - Laura Asmussen - special programs budget b) Community Services - Chastain (see attached July 4 report) 6. Scott Hamilton Ice Show - Kessler 7. TOV's use of Dobson Arena (see attached) - Kessler 7. Public Input / Additional Items 8. Approval of PO's 9. Adjournment ATTACHMENTS: Minutes, August 8, 1990 Financial Report July 31, 1990 Preliminary List - 1991 Budget Figures Fourth of July, 1990 - Final Budget TOV/VMRD contract Scott Company letter - FYI Duddy-Viele letter - FYI Memo - Ford Park Irrigation - FYI Follow-up items - August 8, 1990 Board Meeting - FYI MZNOT88 REGOLAR MEETIN3 VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT AOG08T 8, 1990 MEMBERS PRESENT: Ken Wilson, Gail Molloy, Colleen McCarthy, Lew Meskimen, Hermann Staufer MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Jones CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 3:25 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Hermann Staufer made a motion to approve the minutes from July 11, second by Colleen, passed unanimously. Hermann Staufer wants to see the final figures from the 4th of July event. Jones will have Rick Chastain provide these to the Board. The Board wants the TOV to meet with them regarding the par 3 golf course and athletic filed rest rooms. Jones will arrange this meeting. 1989 AUDIT: Jerry McMahon joins the meeting. He stated that he has already sent a copy of the VMRD 1989 audit to the State auditors office. By law it must be received no later than July 31, 1990. The Board had no specific audit questions. However the cover letter prepared by McMahon raised several questions with the Board members. Therefore, Brian Jones will address each of these points in writing at a later date. FINANCIAL REPORT: Wilson noted that for the 1991 Budget he would again like to see the projected golf pass sale numbers made even more conservative. He also asked if the Forest Service would take over the NC. Steve Foster stated that the Forest Service is not interested in interpretations - they educate, but only in an informational Capacity. The Board asked why some special events are over budget - Hot Summer Nights. Jones stated this program was a break even budget, but it will fall short due to some unforseen expenses (i.e. piano charge from Bravo of $350 plus $75 piano tune and the inclusion of canoe and kayaking expenses). Jones can have the program coordinators further further explain to the Board the details of the special events which are over budgeted at the next meeting. I i Jones stated a good goal for VMRD i;s to have a minimum fund balance of $150,000 to $200,000. i GOLF COURSE ~ IRRIGATION: Ben Krueger joins the meeting. Ben outlined the proposed dollars for the upcoming irrigation project. See attached schedule from Krueger indicating past and future expenses associated with th'e irrigation plan. Brian stated that $165,000 is budgeted for the golf improvements and the irrigation project. Meskimen moved to approve $75,000 to continue the irrigation project for holes 1, ',9, 10, second by Staufer, passed unanimously. ~ SUB COMMITTEE: GOLF Bruce Firm joins the meeting. The CML (Ron Phillips) has requested $30 green fees for their tournament on June 18, 1991. Firm suggests $40 with 7 AM regular tee time start (no shot gun) or $50 for a shot gun. The Board told Firm they will make a final decision later in this meetings when Ron Phillips is present. 1 The Golf sub committee would also like the Board to put pressure on the JFI organizers to do a better job of distributing flyers, posters and advertising. They need to make a better effort ate selling gallery tickets and attracting more people to the event. Wilson indicated the Board will Abe meeting with Barrett to discuss the 1991 contract and will address these concerns of the golfing staff 'and will also try to attract the JFI to hold the tournament both days in Vail so the gallery is not split! Regarding fertilizer burns on the course: See attached Krueger memo. Krueger stated the Scotts company is willing to give VMRD $5,,000 in fungicide to solve this problem. Wilson thanked Ben and his staff for the great job of getting the course ready for the JFI tournament. I The Board and Bruce. Firm are concerned about the quality of work being done on the irrigation project. Krueger explained that the settling of dirt around the sprinkler heads is common and will take time to get everything settled out at which time they will go back and fix these spots. The replacement sod does not match now, but will blend in as timeigoes on. Hermann Staufer stated the SS tournament is in three weeks and asked if the berm and bleachers on the east field can be finished by then. Krueger indicated they would try. I II Krueger will be deep aerifyinq the course. The company which can perform this task unfortunately can only come during the ladies tournament. He will go ahead with this and assure minimal interruption to the ladies tournament. Firm stated the July green fees are off due to the rainy month. They have changed their rain check policy to first accept the customers money, then issue rain checks. They are continuing performing tests on which is the best brand of electric carts either to lease or buy. Molloy asked what is being done to promote the shoulder golf season. Finn stated September is booked and they are going to do a radio ad in October to attract the Summit County people. GENERAL RECREATION: Laura Asmussen stated Hot Summer Nights has had 1,000 people in attendance per event except last week during the rain. KOA is doing a feature story on the event this coming Sunday. SOS is 7 weeks away. The posters will be out in two weeks. Vail Valley Marketing Board is producing a "Summer Is Not Over Yet" flyer. SOS and the golf reduced rates will be included. VMRD has two full pages in the SOS program book. Laura suggests a welcome letter from the Board. The Board would like the other page to be a collage of pictures featuring our facilities and activities. Foster joins the meeting. He stated there was three weeks of soccer camp, a soccer tournament, 3 softball tourneys, Hill Climb and the Vail 1/2 Marathon. There are 3 more weeks of general softball league play and then onto the fall programs. He will also be working on the Free Recreation Program for summer 1991. The Vail Ambassador program recipients are all doing well -Ellifson is in the World Mountain race in Italy, Kloser will be in the world championship. All the candidates wear "Vail" on them during an event. Foster stated were are holding a labor day SB tourney in 3 weeks and the softball fields are still not completed. This sends a message to the players that softball is second rate. There is a sinse of urgency to get these fields in shape for this tournament. Alex from the golf course says they can get a crew to it in 1.5 weeks. Foster says this is too late for the local leagues to reap the benefits of the improvements. Doug Bitetto of the Vail Rugby Club joins the meeting. Their club uses the Athletic field. It is a great facility - the running trak made it a better place, J but the field is overused. He ~ ould like to see ~a maintenance crew dedicated to this field to help alleviate the over use. Wilson recognizes his concern and agrees the fields could be maintained better. He asked Bitetto to once again mobilize the users of the field to attend a Vail Town Council meeting to request that the construction of a bathroom facility be moved up on their priority list. Wilson said VMRD would then have a field and building toydedicate a crew to maintain. I LACROSSE TOURNEY: Jim Soran joins the meeting. (Seelattached handouts) Soran said a 1 hour show was produced for TV and showed the board excerpts from th~s. Teams from all over the US and.Canada were present at this years event and it is estimated an audience of 34.6 million people saw the TV special. Attendance was down a bit, probably due to July 4th being midweek. Soran is asking for field rental from July 29 to July 7, 1991 and would like to sign a three year contract. The Board asked that Soran edit the tape to include the feature shots of summer Vail and give copies to the Vail Town Council. Soran will do this. Wilson stated it is the consensus of the Board to approve a three year commitment to Soran if~~the dates do not conflict with their previous coiitment made with EuroFaire. I DIA CONTRACTS: Erin Simpson joins the meeting and introduced the new DIA Manager, Mike Kessler. ~ Gail Molloy made a motion to apprlove the Ski Club Vail, Curling and Vail Valley Foundation contracts, second by Meskimen, passed unanimously. Meskimen wants to standardize the security deposit used far these contracts. Scott Hamilton Ice Show: This item will be put on the next agenda to allow Mike Kessler some time to research the project and compare numbers from last years contract. TOV VMRD AGREEMENT FIRST ADDENDUM: The Board wants Jones to write a letter to the TOV indicating it is the intent and understanding of this agreement that VMRD will not accept the FP sprinkler system until VMRD deems it in top condition. Staufer made a motion to approve the contract with an accompanying letter written by Janes, second by Colleen, passed unanimously. II I I 1 I CML GOLF TOURNEY: Ron Phillips joins the meeting. Meskimen made a ` motion to approve $30 green fees with cart, shot gun start at 8 AM, second by Hermann - Yes: Meskimen, Wilson, Staufer, McCarthy; No: Molloy. Molloy feels this is too cheap a price to be giving the golf course away. PUBLIC INPUT: JERRY STEVENS RE: SQUASH TOURNAMENT Jerry Stevens joins the meeting. He is the squash director at the Cascade Club and a private shop owner in Vail, Colorado. He is soliciting funds to support the second international squash event to be held September 5-9, 1990 at the Cascade Club which will be host to the tournament as the facility only. Jerry wants to offer cash prizes to attract a higher caliber of players. Next year he hopes to get a corporate sponsor. The Cascade club has an international size court and therefore is able to host players from the national circuit. See attached hand out. The Board explained this is too short notice for them to donate $3,500. They have in house projects of their own which have been put on hold due to a lack of funds. They are willing to help however in some capacity as they want to support all aspects of recreation. Meskimen feels VMRD should not support private recreation events and feels this event falls under that category. Molloy made a motion to give Stevens $500 if he secures seven other $500 sponsors, 2nd by Hermann. Yes-Molloy, Wilson, Staufer, McCarthy; No-Meskimen APPROVAL OF PO's: Meskimen moved to approve the purchase orders as presenteds, second by McCarthy, passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: McCarthy moved to adjourn the meeting, second by Meskimen, passed unanimously. Gail Molloy, secretary I I I VAIL METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT I FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MONTH ENDING JUlY 31, 1990 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BUDGET-ACTUAL ................PAGE 1 - 3 JULY 31, 1990 SCHEDULE OF GENERAL RECREATION REVENUE & EXPENSES.....LPAGE 4 SCHEDULE OF ICE ARENA REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR PROGRAMS & ICE RENTALS .PAGE 5 SCHEDULE OF ICE ARENA REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS ................................PAGE 6 CASH SUMMARY ..........................................IPAGE 7 • I I I I I I I Vail Metropolitan Recreation District PG 1 Reverx~es end Expenditures Budget-Actual Month Ending JULY 31, 1990 CUR PER CUM YTD CUM YTD X of 1990 1990 REVISED JUL 90 JUL 89 JUL 90 BUDGET BUDGET 90 BUDGET Golf Revenues Golf passes 14,461 105,225 112,5461 100.8 111,600 111,600 Green fees 201,171 326,546 338,241 52.0 650,000 650,000 Cart rentals 44,721 85,438 87,682 55.8 157,000 157,000 Clubhouse lease 5,500 22,000 24,750 75.0 33,000 33,000 Net Range 0 3,000 0~ 0.0 12,000 12,000 Total Revenue 265,853 542,209 563,219 58.4 963,600 963,600 Golf Expenses Golf Course Maintenance 34,145 181,976 160,188 51.8 309,426 309,426 Equipment Maintenance 3,399 40,346 40,985 70.8 57,900 57,900 Clubhouse Operations 42,344 108,0253 130,668 ~ 58.9 221,758 225,158 Total Expenses 79,888 330,347 331,841 56.3 589,084 592,484 Golf Revenue Over (Under) 185,965 211,862 231,378 61.8 374,516 371,116 Expenses Tennis Revenue 14,603 19,814 21,193 60.4 35,100 35,100 Tennis Expenses 17,203 52,775 40,967 53.0 77,259 77,259 Tennis Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (2,600) (32,956) (19,774) 46.9 (42,159) (42,159) Ice Arena Revenues 20,903 267,207 224,535 40.3 556,830 556,830 Ice Arena Expenses 33,602 346,518 276,291 41.7 662,728 662,728 Ice Arena Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (12,699) (79.311! (51,756) 48.9 (105,898) (105,898) Gen Rec Reverwes 79,741 183,217 177,761 71.0 250,530 250,530 Gen Rec Expenses 86,828 286,432 305,344 56.8 537,662 544,142 General Rec Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (7,087) (103,215) (127,583) 44.4 (287,112) (293,612) PG 2 CUR PER CUM YTD CUM YTD X of 1990 1990 REVISED JUL 90 JUL 89 JUL 90 BUDGET BUDGET 90 BtAGET ....i..---- Other Expenses: VMRD Administration 78,155 2O7,474µ 285,347 67.8 420,900 450,150 Aquatic Center 0 7,965 0 0 Perk Maintenance 2,113 ..•,.5796 19.9 29,182 29,182 ....._....__._............_......I...... 80,268 207,474 299,108 66.5 450,082 479,332 Total Operating Revenue Over }I (Under) Expenses 83,311 t21i,094) t26b,843) 52.2 1510,735) (549,885) Non berating Revenues Interest Income 3,880 16,252 14,815 74.1 20,000 20,000 Town of Vail Contract 113,798 203,593 292,624 53.9 543,243 543,243 Other TOV Payments 0 0 0 0.0 24,000 24,000 Property/spec own taxes 12,460 327,864 335,676 74.3 451,925 451,925 lottery proceeds 2,274 0 4,730 91.0 5,200 5,200 Free Recreation Program 623 0 623 0 20,000 Misc Revenue 106 2,877 3,283 34.6 9,500 2,000 I 133,141 550,586 651,751 61.8 1,053,868 1,066;368 Non Operating Expenses Debt Service 97,087 157,061 125,579 52.7 238,374 238,,374 Net Non Operating Revenue 36,054 393,525 526,172 64.5 815,494 827,1994 __________________________________________________________________°_==,==S= I I I I I I i PG 3 CUR PER CUM YTD CUM TTD X of 1990 1990 REVISED JUL 90 JUL 89 JUL 90 BUDGET BUDGET 90 BUDGET Capital Projects Loan Proceeds•temis constr 0 250,000 0 0 Capital Outlay Golf Course Improvements 10,937 4,931 88,265 53.3 165,708 165,708 Ford Park Temis Courts 29,192 23,532 268,891 0 58,320 Ruining Track 0 0 0 0 Dobson Water Heat Exchg 0 0 0.0 9,000 9,000 Dobson Heat Exchanger 0 0 0.0 17,000 0 Dobson Rinktex floor Repl 0 0 0.0 15,000 15,000 Golf Carts•Cap Res Accrual 3,000 21,000 21,000 60.0 35,000 35,000 Dobson•Zamb/Ref rig Cap Res 742 24,690 5,194 58.4 8,896 8,896 Net Capital Outlay 43,871 74,153 133,350 53.2 250,604 291,924 Total Revenue Over (Under) Expenses 75,494 108,278 125,979 232.6 54,155 (13,815) Begi ming Fund Balance 1/1/90 111,618 S 111,618 s 111,618' Ending Fund Balance 7/31/90 237,597 Budgeted Fund Balance 12/31/90 165,773 97,803 I 1 ScMdule of 1990 General Ree Reverxxs i Expe~es PG 4 Month EndtnB .RJLY 31, 1990 REVENUES EXPENSES ACTUAL PERCENT ACTUAL PERCENT NET REV BUDGET Ct~ YTD YTD BUDGET Cun YTD YTD OR <LOSS> GEN REC PROGRAMS VOLLEYBALL TOURN (10,750 59,862 91.7 56,340 57,782 122.7 !2,080 SOFTBALL LEAGUES 530,000 525,462 84.9 (28,253 115,024 53.2 (10,438 SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT 514,300 53,750 26.2 511,138 51,769 15.9 51,981 SOCCER IEAGUES !3,950 55,198 131.6 55,225 1911 17.4 (4,287 SOCCER CAMP !65,800 !53,355 81.1 560,350 !34,182 56.6 (19,173 FOOTBALL CAMP 5880 50 0.0 !880 SO 0.0 f0 BASKETBALL CAMP 51,050 1210 20.0 5750 5245 32.7 (535) VOLLEYBAIL CAMP 52,800 52,510 89.6 !1,650 1961 58.2 !1,549 ~ SPECIAL PROGRAMS 510,500 !4,254 40.5 512,250 519,629 160.2 (!15,375>b GEN REC RACES (10,000 (6,753 67.5 f7,9T0 54,263 53.5 (2,490 (150,030 !111,354 74.2 !134,806 !84,766 62.9 (26,588 RED SANDSTONE PROGRAMS ~ OPEN GYM 51,800 51,803 100.2 50 50 51,803 SOCCER 5800 !830 103.8 5570 5579 101.6 S251 BASKETBALL (4,800 51.480 30.8 52,400 f1, 204 50.2 5276 VOLLEYBALL (2,880 51,290 44.8 51,000 5882 88.2 5408 ~ AFTER SCHOOI 58,300 54,872 58.7 51,650 5320 19.4 54,552 I GYMNASTICS f13,200 57,786 59.0 516,320 (6,401 39.2 f1,385 GYMNASTICS CAMP (20,000 50 0.0 (17,390 f34 0.2 (f34) ~ I 151,780 518,061 34.9 (39,330 59,420 24.0 !8,641 POTPOURRI CAMP !33,520 !37,015 110.4 533,518 !30,280 90.3 !6,735 OUTDOOR ICE RINK 50 !3,113 50 57,081 (53,968) I NATURE CENTER 57,000 52,587 37.0 !60,609 !19,972 33.0 (f17,385) I GEN REC OVERHEAD/MISC SO 51,418 !117,663 574,861 63.6 (573,443) 5242,330 5173,548 71.6 5385,926 522¢,380 58.7 (!52,832) YOUTN CENTER (8,200 (4,213 51.4 5151,716 578,964 52.0 (574,751) -.5250,530 -!177,761•- -71.0-- 5537,642-..5305,344.-.•56.8• -•(5127,583) ` I 1 1 Schedule of 1990 Ice Rink Reverx~es i Expenses PG 5 Programs and lce Rentals Month Ending JULY 31, 1990 REVENUES DIRECT EXPENSES ACTUAL PERCENT ACTUAL PERCENT NET REV BUDGET Cum YTD YTO BUDGET Cum YTD TTD OR <LOSS> PUBLIC SKATING PASSES E5,400 5577 10.7 GUEST FEES 140,000 527,025 67.6 SKATE RENTAL 515,000 (10,740 71.6 (60,400 538,342 63.5 538,342 FIGURE SKATING SCHOOL 581,000 (79,436 98.1 539,800 524,013 60.3 555,423 SKATING CLASSES 55,000 56,464 129.3 55,000 53,600 72.0 52,864 JR HOCKEY 519,000 5700 3.7 51,100 10 0.0 5700 LADIES HOCKEY 55,000 5587 11.7 1587 HENS HOCKEY 59,000 54,683 52.0 50 5136 54,547 SKATING CLUB OF VA1L 118,000 59,272 51.5 19,272 SUMMER HOCKEY CAMPS 528,750 530,335 105.5 117,375 514,680 84.5 515,655 EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL 52,500 5178 7.1 1178 CONCESS i VENDING 565,000 521,971 33.8 544,338 514,692 33.1 57,279 SKATE SHARPENING 52,000 51,408 70.4 51,408 LOCKER REVENUE 11,500 5441 29.4 5441 RINK RENTAL 128,080 51,465 51,465 HOUSE SERVICES 56,000 51,292 51,292 !331,230 1196,574 59.3 5107,613 557,121 53.1 5139,453 SPECIAL EVENTS (See Page 6.) , 5221,600 524,220 10.9 5161,608 57,764 4.8 516,456 5552,830 5220,794 39.9 1269,221 564,885 24.1 5155,909 OOBSON OVERHEAD/MISC 14,000 f3,741 93.5 5393,507 5211,406 53.7 (1207,665) 1556,830 5224,535 40.3 1662,728 5276,291 41.7 (151,756) ' Schedule of 1990 Special Event ~ PG 6 Revenues and Expenses Month Endire dULY 31, 1990 REVENUES DIRECT EXPENSES ACTUAL PERCENT ACTUAL PERCENT NET REV EVENT DAYS BUDGET Cum YTD YTD BUDGET Cum YTO YTD OR <LOSS> NBO Show 4 (4,800 (6,265 130.5 51,867 (4,398 Vail Rocks 1 (2,500 (2,500 100.0 (2,500 American Ski Classic 1 52,500 50 0.0 t0 Hall b Oates Concert 1 SO f1,500 f1,500 Votleyball Tournament 2 (2,400 (2,000 83.3 579 f1,921 No Check Tournament 4 54,800 12,535 52.8 (2,535 Future Bus Ldrs of Amer 2 50 (6,000 56,000 Symph of Sports 7 (91,000 SO 0.0 592,585 (685 0.7 ~ (5685) PSGA 2 (2,400 (1,920 80.0 567 (1,853 Figure Skating Comp 4 (4,800 SO 0.0 I 50 Kent Feeds Ice Show 1 t2,500 (1,500 60.0 (1,500 Ice Dance Weekend 3 (3,600 50 0.0 ~ f0 Yortd Yide COG 9 59,600 50 0.0 f0 Ski Swap 3 53,600 50 0.0 f0 YJN Tournament 4 (4,800 50 0.0 f0 Kraft Westman 3 (7,500 f0 0.0 ~ f0 Nutcracker 4 (4,800 SO 0.0 f0 Christmas Show 4 (70,000 50 0.0 (52,817 50 0.0 I f0 New Years Eve 1 f0 50 I ~ Spec Event Overhead 516,206 55,066 31.3 ((5,066) ------------------•----......---...-----...._...._.._...._..._.._..I (221,600 524,220 10.4 5161,608 57,764 4.8 516,456 I I I ~I I ~I I i PG 7 Vail Metropolitan Recreation District Cash Summery Month Ending JULT 31, 1990 NOY Payroll Account Account Total Bey Balance 7/01/90 5131,022 (550,011) 181,011 Receipts 1684,196 5258,107 1942,303 Disbursements (5443,927) (5268,525) (5712,452) Ending Balance 7/31/90 5371,291 (560,429) 5310,862 7 * NOTE: This excludes a capital reserve of 589,594. FINANCIAL REPORT FOOTNOTES - JULY 1990 1) There was concern expressed about overly optimistic budgeting of golf passes. The budget has now been met (birely). 2) Have billed Satch for July and August rent on driving range and pro shop ($3,000 each per month for months of July through October). 3) See attached detail for cumulative pro shop expenses through July for 89 and 90. The disparity between 89 and 90 is largely due to salaries. 4) See attached detail for cumulative administrativelexpenses for 89 and 90. Some of the larger items contributing to the disparity include: salaries (there is an additional employee, however, she has radically reduced management fees paid to Town of Vail); increased professional fees (mostly legal); Insurance costs (increases and timing differences); and the $25k payment to Town of Vail (out of miscellaneous category). 5) The beginning 1/1/90 fund balance (same as 12I/31/89 fund balance) has been adjusted upwards as follows: i Original 1/1/90 fund balance: $91,149 Favorable audit adjustment $20,469 $111,618 This excludes the capital reserve fund as ofd 1/1/90 of $63,400. This fund is being excluded from the fund balance shown in these financial reports since it is strictly for capital projects. The audit adjustment shown here is tentative (I need to perform a detailed reconciliation to confirm its accuracy). As a reminder, fund balance shown in these reports is really current working capital. Fund balance technically~is the same as retained earnings, which conveys very little meaning in our .business. 6) See attached transaction detail for explanationlof special programs revenues and expenditures. I 7) Again, this capital reserve amount is excluded from the fund balance shown on page 3. i ~I ~I • h'eport GLRREPI'2 Fun 1 T!!WU VAIL tT AL!b 1?`.-`0 F'age 1 E>cF•ENSES - PAIL ti!iLF COUfiSE fur the perir:rd end!ng JUL ~j'± Original kerised Aclual Nctual Remaining Percent Fd Dept Acct Fr,j Account Title [;u'dget Budget tom i4TU r_~m YID YTU VTD ~ , 60 '?110 501(!0 000 Salaries 1:5rrOr.r,!i0 1.;5000,rr0 =.1 ~~:.14 l:i_:41.a0 6$658.40 56.5 t•0 •?110 60::00 000 Insurance 704.•.0!) T04e•.C!0 ir,!r!r ~7.;!r,•=7 1716.03 76,0 00 9110 50500 000 S1;i Pass 4i5,!i0 4/5.!JO U.Vir li,OU 476.00 0.0 t•0 91 10 60700 !i0i! Medicare 15r6!r. t!0 l i>6r! ,!r0 :;;!1. 2n i t .2!.r 841 .80 6r'.,T, b0 9110 51102 UO(r Printing ~.0!iO.UCr 20(r0,lrlr !r,r;li ~:•tln,s". 1099.!i6 45.!] 60 9110 61103 0110 Advertising ~lr!!.0000.00 O.OV :,tli lc•3.90 18.0 ~0 911U 51301 040 Bldg .R Struc Fepair Main 60!i,0(r F;irU.!ir1 n.!rn 24,_..!:0 2:53.2U 49.'3 6l1 9110 61302 000 Equip Fepair- & Maint a0r!.OU 400.~.r0 ;l_~.4~ 313.4 86.58 7r..~: u0 •?11U 5130:0 000 i!ffice Equip Repair :C Main r.ir0.irli c.li!.!.rrir rr,lrU rr.Vt7 600.00 0.0 60 91 10 X1323 000 Burg I ar- A I arm Fees ~ 4i~, 00 <4U,0!r ~.~.5!r 1 ~=~7.'_:!r 52.60 7fi. 1 6!i 9110 52101 UOU Utilities/Water Sewer 1(±lr!i.00 1;Oir,nO O.irO _ 14r-:7.75 18.4 60 9110 ~•22U2 OC10 Utilities/Gas ;'F;!n!,n0 2Fr,u}.V!r u.c,!! -F~!:~,aa 30!!x,44 -G0.[ ~0 9110 52203 0!]U Utilities/Electric 6600, n0 t-..-.r.rir,ir!! IFr_;,°.T ._.7 '2•:+:1.73 55.5 60 9110 52'206 000 Telephone Rate Charges c•OU0.0!! br!Vi!.UO 79:.,c.; 2'?rr•~.11 3Crir7,$9 4'?.s_: bU 9110 62'206 000 Telephone Install/Repair .'.60,(ni ~6ir,rr!r n, n0 5~!r,irir 160.00 35.c] 60 '?110 ~22(iT OU!1 Trash Femoval 1~0!.r.!i0 1~!!0.(i0 ~!ro.~!r! ~!'r.'.Otr 1000.00 Ic~.ti bU 9110 52304 000 Postage r1,ir0 O,irq !..,ir!,r lii,l'; -70.13 e•0 9110 52402 000 Janitorial Supplies 2ui!V.Vi! 2VU!r.UV ~_=.43 ~_2.1!i 164T.9!i 17.6 60 9110 52403 CrijO ('heroical Supplies !i,!~r.r (r,r.r!r 1i, 0!i 45.7c. -463.7b 60 9110 52416 000 Misc. !_lperating Supplies 'OU!r./!0'•!~Or'.v0 :~FT.02 1i 11.:_1 13133.7',' S?.7 i+0 911U 52842 U00 Wor-1.:ers Compensation 57,i5.!i!i rr7(:5.u0 0.00 5618.OV 267.fjU 45.3 00 ^?1]0 52852 000 kefunds 1!!!!!!.00 10!!V.!)lr 0.('0 V.!r0 1000.00 0.0 b0 9110 52854 0(r0 Over and Short 0.!irr ir,0(r -U.$~ -(r,>,'•; 0.86 9110 5$59 000 Banking Services 4u0u.nu 4rrOtr.00 .;.:~4 __:13.tc_ -x.313.83 15T.R 6ii ?110 53100 OOU Repairs A Maint/Buildings ~P,iui,irir ~.F.rr0,ir0 „1~,.:.::!r 1:'!!1..:'~ 11`'8.71 62.i! bU '?t 10 6G1!1U OO1 Capital Out/Miscellaneous :3Jr!.0!r !r.r!!,l!t! li.lrrr _r:...2 48%.lr'. 3'+,1 ¦r 9110 +!*e+r+ srsrGolf Course & Club H.ause 0 1~:'Pr~r4•°.,r!(r 1t°~:46.OV .11.7'"' lr ~ 175.41 7E6"70.69 57.6 - - 6U 9111 612c0'2 000 Equip Repair d Maint !`~0!r.Or.! ':nn.u0 u.l!u 111.20 g^a.$0 "~.2 6(r :?111 51223 000 Gurglar• Alarm Fees 24!i,(r!r ~4u.00 ~.:.51r 1~~7.6r,r J52.50 73.1 hU 9111 52201 000 Utilities/Water ;;ewer !00.00 IriU.00 O. Ora !i.UO 1110,OU 0.0 60 9111 52203 000 Utilities/Electric c.75.irli .;•75.00 l,:cl.it 1~~1.Tc: 49:3.22 2b.9 6U 9111 6[c06 OOU Telephone Rate Charges 200.00 20!!.00 166.48 16.7 40 9111 53100 UOU Fepairs ~ Mairrt/Buildings 300.00 300.00 !]0 61..:4 248.15 17.2 •r 9111 •*ar• •rr+rStar•ter- House 2015.!]0 c016.u0 2T7.:.:i• ti.`_~,(:4 1443.16 2R.0 60 9120 54200 UUO Lubricants 1!Ill,lll) lOr,i,Oir •j, (n) <r,0ir fOCr,OU O.U u0 9120 64:300 000 Vehicle Farts IOiin,Ori ti!u!.!.!!!! 1:1.' l' ~ ~~•1,~r. 715,80 [8.4 @•0 912U Fbl'?0 !i0(r CAPITAL kESERVE ACCI:UAL _:!:r!!!i!!.!iu ::gq(r0.00 (•,lur !.r,r.rir 35000.OU 0.0 rr 9120 trrrrGulf Carts 3o1U0.00 361!rO.OI! 1=1.'!0 .:_4.20 v:5>::15.80 11.7 rr* Gran.i Totals rrr ~2_•:+r.1,i!p ~"9c.1.(rir --•.7.4? 1li::,r,'!::.a`r 115::?.;~,~F 48.2 F;EF-UT1L1 Release CCSGL GLR600-1 C~~ c•1 it:~'~!_ for of LE.E ANN .r r. rr'-:06:67 17 AUG 19"?0 ~1 . 0 O fiep!+r-t GLfiftEF'T2 Rur: 1 TirWll iIF VAIL 1T AUG 1990 Paye 1 EXF'EN1ES - VAIL GULF CUUR=E far tr,g T.errod er,~irn•3 JUL 'r0 !,rryir,al Fevised Actual Actual Renraininy Percent F~1 Drpt Acct F'r•.I .hrr-,,unt Trtle [7u~lget Lu4•aet Gum MTD Cum YTD YTD YTD r.0 '?ItU r!il0ir !r0!i ';ala. rr•s 1`~!!_~5u.'~0 1~,IrAb!I,OI) ~~153.U5 945'i+$.75 56051.25 e2.7 ~,ri ?l lri ~,rr^i:ii Unrr IriSlJr'allie I~r_~~.i!!.!'!~ 1V•_OU,lrO 1•SF_;.13 5Sd4.Ct8 4735.b2 55.3 bu ''110 °~Utiiri! r,,i?!r ,.'~,irlr ~:;::r:,0!i 0.00 O.riU 525.00 0.0 bU '?110 5070~.r ,i0, Medre:r,:.~I~i•1.tr0 '.1c4.V0 464.23 1371.c•> 812.3[ G2.8 f' r:. r) 9110 '~11U~ Vlr!r I•rrrrfrr,3 1401r.VU 14!iU.CrO C1.rJlr 356.15 1043.85 25.4 6U •?1lO '~11U3 0!i,.r AJverti;rny 1!~rrlr.U0 1VOir.00 U. 00 174~.U4 -742.04 174.2 h!i 9110 61~~4 Ur:ru =.,v1'ta~are lnsta~ latrvn bUO,lri! ~,ir0,!i0 O.QU O.UO 5OO.Or) 0.0 E.U 9110 '1:+01 OUV [:~I~1~ L 3tr'ur. heFaii I~larr. Il~Uir.UO I11V0.Uh 9U. V0 b31.43 368.57 63.1 60 9110 51:.±02 0lrU E,aurp`F'eparr Marnt _..5.lriJ ;~J,OO O.UO 60.64 2bd.36 IB.4 c•U Y1 10 51'30:; lair) Of f r c e E,au ~ p krpa i r i. M~ r n vl'V, Vu •?U0, VO O. VU 107.'?U 792. t0 11 .9 ou 91 10 513'; ; ur.rU i•ur g l ar N l :rru: free .:4v.00 260.00 O.OU 329.40 -69.40 126.6 SV '?110 5~10~ •.,l,rr f'r~,iessl~~nal Dues ;,r~!.rrrr 300.00 O.IrU L'3U.O0 70.00 76.6 6U 9110 ':L'e.Ul rjliir Ut r I r t i e5!IJa CAr' _EWer I :;I/U~rjlr IY40.v0 152.00 800.25 999.75 44.1 rO 9110 5i:~i)~ !iUrr U1:Ifiti,;siua, ~r'1~0.V0 20!lU,r)ir -44.1.44 -281.L?4 2281.86 -14.0 c0 9110 $2Cri~: Ur.rO Utl~rtres%Electrrc or.r.n!,r,n r~UU,Vii 937.34 4~56.b3 2343.37 61.4 6V 911!1 ~22C~` Ulr!! l:lephi~ne hate C•har9e5 ;UO~!.VU 3000.00 3U~~.t37 1205. d5 1794.$5 40.1 n0 •?110 5220•:• 0,ier 'lelehtr~.~ne th5tal I •krparr •:~`~~.!r!r 9•i"CrCr 4$;.40 o00.2U 391.80 40,5 ' bU 9110 52~!il lrVrr lra5n hern•-.~al 1~0~~.1!r) l:a:!r.lrli 141.50 160.29 539.71 55.0 6Cr 911V 5~4u~ irli:.i Jan r t~~r r a l .upp l r e; 1~~v0.0!r 15Uir,0!i 8`+.51 1236.19 263.81 82.4 E~0 '?110 r_~.?O1 UUU Mr sc.. iJper' at r nq Supp f r es i~;UO.!~V 4:'00.00 45. 4U 4UE•1 .82 -1241.82 126.2 ti0 91101 ~,~:0~ r~u!i Wr,rlErs Ci~rnpen;ati~.r, 7V1~'"!,lr 7110~.QO 435. U0 3933.00 3069.00 5b,1 ~,U 911!1 !r0!r ketun,:5 Ir,!r,J.Oli iCi0V.0U O.UU O.UU 1000.00 0.0 h0 '~11U 5~:.',4 UVU liver ind '_,'nort 0.V0 0.00 '36.40 47.:30 -47.30 .trr 9110 K.~;3`~•:> !ilnr harrl:irr9 er'vr,:~s "C!Ir,VU 0.00 292.28 4507,72 4.2 r", t) :'lllr ~,'~g•7_, irlr!` Empl?•..ee }'Iue I'r~~•)rarn ~50.1rr,, V2filr,!iir O.UO U,iJO[50.U0 0.0 c•U 9110 !=~31!r0 OUrr F~:pairs MaintUur~•Irngs l.'_~nr•,lrU l5i!0.V0 O.UO 3708.17 -2208.17 24'?,8 .U `-'110 !?~VI!' ~.r!rO iaprlal !ut•'4iirce Equrpme 17!1!•.0•.1 1/04.00 U.UO O.OU 1700.00 0.0 . r0 Y110 F,t;U'~ii U!1V Capital lrt.t:Ci•rnp~ter rfsrJv 4ur,l,,rn. 4000,001 O. UV U.OU 4000.00 O.O u0 •?110 .."'~c~U:cir lru0 Capital r:1ut,C:cmputer .;,,Itv ~0r10,ir0 20UU.G0 0.00 O.UU 2000.00 0.0 r,0 9110 56100 U0r1 Capital 1?u t:M~sr.ellaneous ?~00.u0 t~VU.uU 23.48 143.47 636.53 20.4 ii+ 9110 ~R*** •*#*irolF Car,r'se Club H!,use U _1Gtic~$.(n.r ~1o5S8.UU 35124.47 1280!5.76 88572.24 69,1 it bO 9111 51~~U~ UO0 Equip repair MarnC t~lu.u0 510.00 O.UU 0.00 510.00__ O,O 6U '%111 '?131:: !iUr, Uur'yl ar NI ar'm hEeS ~r.0,r:1U %110.00 _ O.UO -65-. $8 -1-94.12 25.3 SU 9111 5Y<0l rr!•U Ut r 1 i t i es: Water £~eaer _ '_~~0.,~r!r--- ,::011:00- 84.25 690.75 -390.75 230.2 6U 911_1 FZ[.u.3-0.1ir•1--IJt=r-I-i-t-re-s-El-ei:tr`rt 400.0!1 4VU.U0 141.35 9118.83 -508.83 227,2 eU '?111 522u~t iruu T e l epn~~nr fiat? (har•,ar. s v.v!; 0.00 81.32 247.51 -267.51 601 9111 53100 Ur,!1 keparrs ~haintlBurldin,a5 Ir~ir.Oti li!lr,UO U.UO 42.96 57.04 42.9 • rr 9111 {iRiFRk **aR'3tartar H<.use !t'~7r:1,Ur:r 16: O.UlI 304.92 1975.93 -405.93 125.8 ~0 91~U 5445 ri0!~ kepiir Far is%u~t,rcles 3r1~r!1.!rU :000.010 O.OU 274.57 2725.43 9.1 t•U '?1~0 F4~00 001,1 ;_nhr rr.anr•s 10!1,1111 lUrr.VU Ir.UU U.UU 100.00 O.O ,7U 91::0 °4:::010 0!+i, veGitla fart; ''~0U.U0 ~,OO,Cr!r O,CiU 4G1.80 9$.ZO 80.3 ' i•U 91_0 r"c.1 ~U a„r1 1'A61:A1 kk'1:I:VF ACr!fl.rll. :':n0u,lir, P_a1UU,UC1 U.t10 V.C1U 3!$000.00 U.O t:EF•-UT1L1 h'elexs~ r~Ct:;~.:L ,~LR_r.10-I Ey c1 CCSGL for 61 LEE ANN on U9:U4t59 17 ,AUG 1990 ~ ~ .r~ O • F~eport dLkNcF'fc k.~n I Iii,~IJ irF vA1L 17 AUG 1990 Page L ::::Fr_NSF.:S - VA IL 6!If l:Ci.l~'`.E 4;~r- tRe perr~~a ei~•.lin~ JUL 'ar.i ~.~rryinal Revised Actual Actual Remaining Percent Fd Uept Acct F'r- I Acc~•unt I ~ t I e G'ud,aet Eud3et Cum MTD Cum YTD YTD YTD i ~+1~p ~**>6~~It •-~rt5 ::,oQu.~n! :;3::prr.liV U.UO 676..:7 ,7923.63 1.7 •+ir Grand Total ~ r*+ ~°c76;.Orr ZF-.15:3.00 ?54:?3. 3'? 15U6e8.06 126089.94 5V.8 . 0 • keport GLFN,EF'1;: kun I 1!twN OF vAIL 17 AUG 1990 Paye 3 hECFrEA'f10N AUMIIJ E;;r r:N5c5 - UEF'I c•1!•!. i •1 tue 4•drl••d endlna JIJL e'+ Fund: .;fl ~/All. rIE'iRr! kEr D1'.1 tIVEF FUHU Department 6 h'ECktNTlON - 1'OIAI. • ~:rr-Iglnal keviseJ Actual Actual Renraininy Percent • 1=d Dept Acc! Fr,j AI c:~ulrr I 1 t.l a Gud•3et Eudget fum MTD Cum YTD YTD --VTD-- .:u ti100 girl(r•] Oiilr '>alarres 11~44.ilir 11'~:44.OG -18b1$,94 61153.3b 52190.64 53.9 c:U 6100 `:021'0 Vu! iii er' t r n,e U. ir1.r 0.110 0.00 L58.~3 -258.23 6100 F:1•i3U0 U!rU lnsu:-ance ty: c4.UU 1•?c.~i4.U11 ~~e~.E.4 10238.49 9445.51 52.0 t50 6100 5U4in,r (rU0 Fetlre:nt•I,t 17:;•tU.1rU 17.340.00 -:347~,nE. ,~444.d9 7695.31 55.6 bli F.1 GU ~;irF:irl-i 1]pU Ski F'~r=s 17Uir.UO 17CrG.00 0.00 Z5U.00 1450.00 14.7 c•U E.lU!i F~(iTl,nr Ul,rlr hlEdi!ar-„ 1::••14.00 1644.0(x -~o1.7a 889.38 754.42 54.0 r,U alUU 51101 1x00 '..orrtl a~:. C LaG~!r' ;:4UC,ili1 24UO.G0 U.UO 2299.19 100.81 95.7 4U u l uU !'.1 1 0.' t- uU F'r' 1 r, t r ny '~v1.1. UD 3';UO . UO 155.25 1021 .'~:3 241 8.07 30.9 i:.l,r 61(,0 Fllii_; ul,rl.l .4dvrrlrslrt,~ :'.1x1;0.01, 211110,00 _~:3.5G 393.30 1406.61 19.4 E.U c:1!iu °•1~ix:'. u'.n? Gi r eC t~•r F"res 47:~1,,Ulr 47F:U.UO U,<lt) 17GO.U0 '3050.00 35.7 6U 6100 F.l~ri3 !~UU A~4it Fres 4Uli!r.UV 4000,1x0 U.OG 607.00 3333.00 16.6 60 01 U0 °.l::la Ully k'r':•iBSSr~.ne) Fee= _':~`•DD.UD 32`:(iO.VU O.UO 8'?'15.75 29524.25 23.3 11.0 0100 `•1~ZU 1x1]0 1~!anagEdxeilt r'ee5 ~ 451`rl.li!r •15191.0!1 -1533.40 22082.56 23108.44 48.8 60 6100 51«•1 UpU ~•oftaur a Instal latior• IDVV.!r':' IVUO.Dir 0.00 O.Vp 1000.00 0.0 60 filOG 51ti~1)•t 1?UO Coplel F•.ek•air' IAainl f•`•F•Cr.rr!i 5550,00 F_,b2.38 2791.58 2758.32 50.3 00 E.100 51311 U!,!1 C!•mputer' '~t•t t'rar r Ma 1 r t.ene 110.!x0 7'30.00 O.OU 90.00 690.00 11 .5 bU 61 U4 52101 u(>!i Fr!~fes9ivnal Ucvrlvpmellt 1'c:U0.0ix 1800.00 O.OU 940.46 859.54 52.2 60 4100 5~10~ i?VO F'r:,ies:i..,nal f'u?s ~~!`.~v.!lu 2.4~:i).vU U.UO 24:+9.14 10.84 99.5 6') 6100 521114 1rirlx Igra15 .t!i!,,!rl.x 41r(r,r]1) O.UO 148.52 251.48 37.1 • 6U olOU :.1114. (>!lii I.11 lea•3e I';<imodl srmcot 1~'~!I.U11 1~4U.OU '2`:,60 8'1.64 418.36 46.5 d0 bl(tU 5~1U7 Dnt.r hot;k;:udscrlpiF•er-ic~~ilcal: 150.!rir IE~G,00 0.00 70.49 79.51 46.9 bU 61 u0 5~~uF; Du!' T'elepbvne liate t:'har~,es 41'V.('V 40(r.VO 334,09 2440.34 -2040.34 410.0 6U 61UG 52!•0 i,•Jst felrF~h..r.e tr,stall;k~parr- ~OU.!'Cx ZGir,Oll O.OU 139.51,1 40.50 69.7 00 41011 5"3U~ !,~!!r ('~.•prer Suppl i~;s 101'1!.00 liIUU.VO U.l1U 249.6L 750.38 24.9 cir E.lOU F2:31•r U~li~ !iener :r I •J1 f r Ce upp l r e e >:U'~V,1.11,x 8050.00 251.5 3849.69 4200.31 47.8 .:0 r'.1 VD 5~:::~14 UU1~ F'•• ~ t a ~e O::a~. U!+ 3r.~5 . UU O. Vi) 3705.41 -80.41 102.2 .U ::11]0 .`.:~4n~ 1,10!1 Jai,lt~~1 ral 'iuk~plles I`_•0.1.1!r 151.x,00 O,UG 47.45 102.35 31.7 .:0 ;:•l0U ~~-Il4 !t0!' 1=L!,t•.••,1'ap1,iC Salpl led U,OU U,UU 15.22 15.7.$ -15.28 I~ c.0 ,_.100 Kam`:::! iJ1•i; eli =i :ns.~r-a1~1 o- l:asl; ,.1~011,i?1+ .:1200,1-lir 24122.50 4330[.50 17897.50 70.7 i x,'.11 x•:100 F.::=:.1 I,r~rn [~•.ntr 1~'~.Mlnrel!aur'•.~5 0'!".DU e•0011.OU 10011,pQ 2500.00 3500.00 41.6 r.0 r.lir!~ !':~:c:41 1x00 Unc.mpl.•:1nEU1 111. 4_:°•,un 4~2b.1i1? 912.26 1450,'17 2774.03 34.3 E•ll C•IOU ~~~~-:'k . 1.1111) w.•~ krt S l!•6, I•lnidt 1u~1 4c~t~/.~11~ 4F•t~7 .G(1 II, GG 4G'32 .'i+6 224.04 95.3 c.U x:100 K,~.,:°. DUV L'ad GaDt I.::pense -IUU.UD 40(x.00 191.00 553.20 -153.20 138.3 _ 60 611)0 Kl~i.'_:4 DUU Uver aoA 'Jt~or-t U,1,u1 U.VO O. 110 9_._0.3- ~-9-03-- bU 61 U0 5Gci86 U1, t•uGi ic:.t r"n of Le•3a1 tJotiC 1U1•rO,Uu --1-040-00 o.UO 128.48 271.32 72.8 SU 6100 "~~~~`~~=U_!LI!_M.1_i.c-r--I-I-a-ne-;•u-. ~SU.!nl 450.00 X1.44 148.4'? 301.51 32.9 oU r.1 U0 K2259 O1ri~ L'anl:ir,g Sereices 1t0U.40 12+]G.00 1996.95 1921.34 -721.34 Ib0.1 6U 6100 c%28./4 OUix E~nplo~•ee Assistance F`rc•yra 40U.VU 400.00 1$9.42 379.24 20. Td 94.6 60 4100 52870 Duix 'i'reasurers Fees 1~15u.liU 12150,00 349.00 6602.01 5487.99 54.8 nU GIOU S~:E~79 UDir F'arkin•; r!res t~':U.UrI 1'~i1lI.UU U,UO 440.00 760.00 36.6 d0 d10G 53100 4vC> kepairs Mniot.C'~uild~ngs bdu.ull 640.00 0.00 93.10 546.90 14.5 6U 6100 534(111 (il]i f;epalrs N'arotJil4fiCt• Fqu 1200.0!1 1200.00 35. u3 938.•!1 241.29 78.2 dU 0101? 560b0 ODtx i.ap i t a l Gut ' f-'~r n i tyre r:• :50.0!1 e350.0G G.OCr 6320.25 29.75 99.5 , GU rt.10(1 riFrriM IrwlrrkeCreatl•,n Ade,irlrstratic.n _=~1;U.Ul~ .:c213U.Uu 8'?07,36 207473.86 174456.14 54.2 ~ ,_.0 ri1** ++*~{:eir-1•~,tl:,u F,i,ulni;llatl~~ri .-_~1 ~1..1r!r _..<Zlc:rr.r.rU 05'07.:.6 207473.8b 174656.14 54.2 h'EF'-U1'll.l Fteleasr til I/r1~•~ 1 I.y c•1 CC'~(il.. fur 61 LEE ANN on G9:U9e35 17 AUG 1990 J• 0 • R?part GLkREFT~ Run 1 fiiWN iiF VA1L 17 AUG 1990 Paye . .kECREATlOIJ AUMIN t':h'EIJ'~LF; - LIEF': c•1:~0 r~~r the perii~d endin_a ~UL r~':r Fund: o!r VA1L M~Ifil~ hE~ C•['~I !~1'Lk Fl.1fJU • Department _ hr~_F:EAt lull - Tii1Al !irijinal krvised Actual Actual Remainin3 Percent • F~d Dept Acit f•r,i .Account title I;ud•3et f'udget Cum MTD Cum YTD YTD YTD r.U F.rrk r~r+*r .rrai;F:~ F'!iAl1~~IJ - IU'i4L ,:<~.1~~.~'V ~'%~'13U.!rG ~'~U7.3 c'~j7473.'0'0 1T4E•56.14 54.2 ~r*• r?e?? .+rtVA.t~. MF.ir;l~ kE.t. ~)1'I ~ir•i_t' r __:.:.Iu.!~!~ 3:~Iu.Ui~ ~•~!r'/.3~; :'.!~T4'/:.cso 174656.14 54.1 r?* Grand Totals F, ; =,u!. •=~~git.0!r ~;7<1~.31 48966:i.4~: 436124.57 52.8 L, • • Deport GLftRERT~ i:~~, 1 f!rklN (+F VAIL F;EC"kEATI(rlJ ArMll! ~:~F'tr~l•=.f_;: - Dr:F't _:11~u f;.r t;n~ rer~,~..: eri~frr~.~ 1111 'sir I7 AUG 1990 Pave 2 I~und: Yt+tl. M;:7F'+.r I~Ft I~I'~:f ur•f..N FUIIU • Department hI-.iY.t.,111UM - lillAl. (tri• real Fevlse•i Actual Actual Renralnin9 Percent 3 • Fd Dept Acct F•r,l Ac+c•c,rrt I i tle Gu•]get Lu•i3et --------Cum-M7D -Cum-YTD --------Y7D- YTD OU OlUU 5!rIUU !rU0 Sala+ ie; 1`.~(rirr,i,(n.r 1:J2000,UO 13430.51 84804.21 05195.79 57.1 • cU 41 U0 5(i~!iti r.r„!, ir!frtirne r~.~rl~ V,UU O.OU 21'x.27 -219.27 c.U 010ir 5v3n!i uU!~ Ineuranc.r '_0.:.1,5'.00 :30[SY.CiU 331.29 16901.35 13327.45 55.9 oU h10U 5n4l~0 UUU kelrre,ner:t ~~o`:+r.uU ~~c•`~U.UU 2103.90 129$7.30 9462.04 57.3 • 50 O1 UU 505+rU !'UV 51. r 1~ as s 1 _:otr. U0 1 v:(rCr.(rU O.OU 500.00 800.00 38.4 c,V c•IUO SU7UV uU0 Ma4icare ~~~~~.ur.r ?~Cr4,OV 194.74 1258,35 945,45 57.0 OU OlUU °•1101 Uuir Contract LaGor lt•!?U,U(r 100!1.00 94.00 484,x0 514.00 48.4 • 60 6100 511U~ VU!r F'r irit, rng .:.7~'~U.+nj r,75V.vU O.UO 5142.1.5 1407.15 70.1 ~_U E.li.1U 511!':. (,UU A.ivertr,rn9 1'='3U.UQ 142:0,(rU o5. 7U 1924.12 3.88 99.7 oV c•lOV 51~lr~ UUU L~irectc•rs• fees 4l°t!!.UV 476V.UU U.OU 1800.00 2950.00 37.8 • dU ~lUli 51~U~; UUD Aa•iit Fee_ r_.nCr!r,rr!r ~.rjU(r,(r(r !i,UO t), U0 4000.00 0.0 c•0 E•lOp E:1<lu Profr'ssr••nar Feey ~P.000,Crlr ::Fl'VU.00 F05,5ir 151'?1.80 9808.14 40.7 OU O1+>!i F,I:~V irt,!r Mian„geu~nt fNes >lr~;t:l.iir! ~:7r1~l.CrU 9U5~.0:_ 8192. b'4 28828.14 22.1 • ;(r c•lU(r '•121 UU•r E:lectr,:r, F'er'; ":`:.l~tr c:ZP.,IiU U.UU 2195.93 39.07 98.2 r.p 1ii(r F:1 .;r.r•I UUu i_r~i•ro.- F`:ol~.~,r, 19arnr gr,5'~,Uir 4`.F"lir? 942.0!1 3467,•~h 1084.01 74.1 •i•U c•1UU tilll Vrr•r C'•~n,p.,ter ~.Ftwere Maintc•ni 1.•~,+•,un 1!r+,r<!,1,0 (r,(rU U.OV 1000.00 0.0 r.+.r -.lair 101 r.,r,nr F'r.•te•ssr..nel l•evel•,l~o,eat .<ur,rr.r,!u, 3!1!,0.00 U.UU 471 .z2 2628.78 15.7 6U c•lUU ~:~Ir)~ UlrU r'r~.r,ptsr•~nal U.,es lc•i';.!rV le•7F..OU O.UU 1905.00 -230.00 113.7 00 4100 5~ l V4 i,(ru deals 4110. nr,r 460.00 54.04 23b.24 111.74 72.0 • +SO 0100 5z1U5 U(~U Mr leave ke iu,Gur serner~t l,:`~U.UU 1250.00 V.OU 5`1%.45 722.35 4Z.2 OU 410!1 52107 !r(rU 1:~~.~•i:s.'~uDSCr-rp,'F'errcdicals ~`•O.Uir ~50.Oir U.pO 19.00 231.00 7.4 Ou 0100 52.05 x011 lerrf~lrone kale C6a~9e5 117r,u,UO 11700,00 311.93 2854.19 8845.81 24.3 • OU 4106 ti22Ve. ir(iir lele{'.hone 1•istall/kenarr- 4CrU.!r(r 4(rO,V(r O.OU 235.41 144.59 58.8 bU 4100 52:U~ U+,rrr r'c.pr,tr :=uF'PI ie; 1.-..;~ rr,r 19•;+v.UO a F 0.00 2.9.02 1494.38 1...0 OU O1UU 52.1;0_; U(rir General Uffice Supplies 375U.!rU 3750.0(r 337.90 3517.:;8 232.42 93.7 4U OIUG 515~U4 U(ru Fosta•.te c; _u.u.vU 5050.00 448.58 34"17.20 1572. B0 48.8 OU 01 U0 5~40~ (rUU Janitorial ~ul•plies 4UU.rrU 40(l.ni,r 31.25 90.83 309.17 22.7 6U 4100 524u4 UUn F't,ot~;_araph,rt _upplres O.+rO (i.OU 0.00 34.00 -34.00 • 40 OIUU 52410 +:rUO Misc. rrper'atrng `.ui•plies (+,uU +j,ir0 O.UO 8.80 -S.RO OU O1 U0 525~3~r UUU Mi,c Insurance t:'•~ste 4:::Kirir,+.rl, 4oSUU.VO 51802.55 54410.55 -5914.55 112.1 411 6100 5:_+:10 !,iru i.rtfite E1•rrp kental n.UU U.+)U 0.!iU 90.00 -90.00 e•U e•lnO E~2.:11 U~~,r Mrs,:. UI•~ratrn•i krntals !r,n+r O.UU U.OII 180.00 -180.00 44 c.1nU 5'_3_:1 lrUO r,tr'iG:Mrscellarrer~•rs 5i;!in,l!0 500+i•VO O.OU 5750.00 -750.00 115.0 •__°.U 41 u0 5~~>4l U!r0 Une,nf•loyrnant Ins 43`_•~.OU 435'2.00 1083.92 2419.62 1732.38 40.1 . :U 414Cr ~~2_i4~ t-!r!i W.,rl:ers tc.mr.rn;atrvu 7uc4.UV 7V.54.V0 439.OV 7051 .U0 13.00 99.8 nU ,:.100 Fr~~:r,_ Uil+, l:rd Uet.r, E: ::•~ar,se _ oU~1,n+r ~ O.-OU 70-0(1 - uU..-!rr+ 53~.vo 11.e SIUV-5-~%"•c• +,r:r~i F'uhlrrati•.n ..f Lt•]aI II•irc 4nU,Crr,i 400,U(r O.UO 87,00 342.40 14.? 4u 6fOV 52:;`::? t.lrt, Mr;cellaneous IUr,,urr IuU,UO 743.52 30084.90 -299$4.94 30084.9 00 0100 5285'+ U(rU I~anl r ngoer v r r e s I F,irri, VU 1500. (r4 0.00 114.91 1383.09 7.7 OU 410V 52:3~_•l Ui•v C.•.rnputrr Ser~r~es _t•uU,+1U ;UOU.OV U.UO 90.00 2910.00 3.0 OU ~•1UU 51;70 vUCr fr ensurer s Fees 1::`:~e•!r.UO 129c•O.uU 418fi.T3 9754.97 3205.03 76.2 4U t:lVO 52819 ODU I~arkrny Fees l~iru,Ur1 12Uii.0(r 0.00 123.55 1076.415 10.2 4U ofUO !i2:>5• Uuir Vr•IkD Cmployee I~ar•ty '.Uir.00 °•OU,O(r O.UU 149;1.75 -1193.7'3 338.7 OU 41 V0 52E:9c• UUU Employee F'•lus F'r!:yram ZUV.V(r 200.00 -30.00 -15.00 216.00 -7.5 t•0 4100 5'1irU r1r;r0 Rel~ai+s t. ldairrt:[~urldin.Js bUU,+10 040.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.0 ' OU OlUO 53duti UuU Feparrs Mainlir.ti'/rcr' E,7u 1(~~<:.uV 1821.00 '~0.8•l 598.40 1223.40 32.8 . 00 0100 5?(rlit r:riiii !.aortal irut:(rttirN Equrpr+re 1(~UO,!i0 1000.00 U.UO 1339.58 -339.58 133.9 f; f: F'-07111 he lease Cc'3+,1 !:IF.:.~rr~•1 By 41 CtSCiL for 41 LEE ANN un (i9~14s34 17J1U6 1990 0 Report GLkF'EPT~ Run 1 1hWFJ OF VAIL IT AUG 1y~0 Pa3e 3 RE:C'REAI'1!ifJ AU!MItJ t::F'E11_t.=; Def'i C••JUC t••r the F•er r..d er,~!in;1 JUL '=r9 F=und: .:V 1'All McTF'U FEC Ui:;T lrF't.R FL'NU Departrnent h'F:::~:FAI li!rl - TOIA~ !rrrrnal Revised Actual Actual Reaainin Fercent 7 Hd Dept Acit F•r'.I Acc"unt 1'rtfe [;u•i3et Dud3et __-Gum MTD ___Cum YTD ____-_-_YTD _-YTD__ 4V 51VO ~~e•0:_V hair Capital {:ut/fc,r,p,rt.er tw 1'~:hh.r?h IOV.00 U.00 0.00 1300.00 O.U bli r_•lOli 5:1Uh rrhu CaF•,taf i.ut:'Mrscell~n<.„us t~~:n.hr,r 1G5U.!iU O.UO 442.2 787.78 36.9 Fn F.lrilr 5110 vrr!i Fr ,cal Agent r-e•~s tul•u.nv IVir0.U0 V. 90 0.00 100V.00 U.0 c•9 c:iirir •**+N +k*•Rr'cr'eatr.,r~ A.:l,nrcrstra6r~•n 4~h~1!U.l,h 4~hf'VU,i10 78154.54 285;144.77 135553.23 67.T %h r_.1*? ?s**~ r...Recreatr~;r, A~Jn~inrstratr~~r, 4~ira!rp,r.u) 42!1'-00.00 7?154.86 285346. 7T 1:35553.23 47.7 oV t:**rt *r*~? +*??kr:('r,~'afJl~rl - fUfAt. 4~h:r,rr,.~i!r 4~:U'h0.1!U T815•t.56 [85.344.77 135F53.23 67.7 E•U +~r? !r+~*r aaa?r'v'AI~ PI~1F'Cr fttC L't:,F C'!'Er' f• l~l,`rih.uh 4~!i•=liir,Oli Tr":154.5e• 2s3534h.77 1:35553.23 4T.7 *~r* (ir-and T'ot31 ~ ~.r •:!t.''/•i.'.hV 9•s~7•a.3.00 781'=r4.47 5531'?1.53 40'601.47 57.4 Repart GL.FtFSUM Fun 1 1!iWhJ OF' VA:L 14 AUG 1?'?0 Fage 8 GENERAL kEC FEVENUES C~ E~F'ENDITUFES YTD - LAL'fiIE ASMUSEN for• the per-i~.J ending !!c/.1/'~U Account ~ Account Description/ Running Bal. or Trans Month, System, Pest Type, Trans Code/Trans Date, Fiet'erence I~e9innrn•a L~al. Debits - ~-redits Ending Balance 00 0000 4c1?0 000 Pr•tpour.r-i r* cor,l:inued 07/~~~/90 Rcpt =_~O1°. •9? NAME=F'liTl'!~UFFI \7/:''/.,,~! I,i,,:0.00 i!7/~~~/'~'0 Fcpt =~~0156U NAME=F•itTFiiUhFl \7/~4/`.?C! 1,!!1'7.50 0-1!?l/'?ii Fcpt =:COIF'?? hiAME=F+_~fFr)URRI ~7,~'~ REV 1+=:4!i•Qr) !i7/:1/•%+0 Rcpt =i::r!1_:!i!i hJAME=F'ir1FUURFI ',7/~7 RE'J 1,•412.00 Aug C:G MSC'R A Cash rec?ipt r:r,irii ll.r•`_%Ci.SU <11,E.~+O.`0> U8/08/90 kcpt =?~Olrir_. NAME=FUTFQURFI \7/27/'?!! 1,412.00 Oo/U$190 Fcpt =:iilE•I7 NAME=F'!iTl-'4UFtFI \7/_x(,/';,0 :~,35.0U 08/OE/'?0 Rcpt =8Ots1~; NAME=PCrTFr)UFRI \7lc:i/',0 2,~18.V0 08/08/90 Fcpt =$01,_•1'7 NAME=F'OTF'OURFI \'~/~/'=,0 ~+`'-'ii•`C' u8/08/~?0 Rcpt =~~01!~20 NAME=F•uiF•CiUFFI \8/(i_:;~~!! 1+`1''•00 08!08/'?0 Fcpt =:Olc•~1 NAME=POTF!~UFFI \:~~/r•/?0 1,7!i~.p0 t.;.t7V a_, 105.00 CC totals Jun CiL 17 A Jaurnai entry S:~O.00 <FE%U.007 U7/30/'?0 ,rE=OC!h017V REF=F/C F'!~TF'QUf~nI kEV TCr UEP7 i!vU0 F0.00 GL totals ir,!)(! 56!!.00 ~1 v c:ndin;7 L:alance: i4$,tic~5.00? 6!i•,:(!pry.rrirrrr#.***rREVENUE..'~~s•~~~(Tr .~11G~~Q~OC~t~..S~S(`IYS~t-lP ./~f''~~~~•!,i........i;`r'!:F•/.'........•1•!:~•7_.40......`7'3,602.9i~>• J r:r f~1~•~U'S Yz ue.ru,tk ~,•F ,e ~ 10~C.% ~G t,'~f~..J.u?, - ri0 63~i0 ~,OlOi~ 0i!0 Salaries G-'r9innin_a l~afance: 0.00 .Jul F'F A F'ayral I posting _;.r;!ri V.UU G3.40 U8/4:./'?0 F'AY F'kFI!rD ENU 07 /31/'a0 r•3.!i!i t•.OV 0.00 F'k totals Ending Ealance: 63.00 br)-f•i~ U-5-1-1-03-000 •-A fi v e r-t-i-s-i-n ` E_e ~a_r_ri n_1_n_g-• G a l a r. c e_:_ .............4.00 .Jul AF AFCA A Clairn entry, accrual 1,~01.,:~4 i+.UO I,cV1.54 U7/2c/90 VN=VA IL F'FINTING DES;!'=HGT SUMMEF NIGfITS-TICk.E75, T F'ir=!+_:71c;!~ ~~!~.4!i U7i27f9(! VN=NAIL F'FINTING DES('=1c L'!~WUFF TI!I'El;i/H!!T 'c.MR NiS F%r.r=i~_<7~•arr _,'1.14 U7/~7/9U VN=ROC'!N MILLEk GRAPHIC DL"5C=H,)f 'oUMMEk NIGHTS F'Q•3fEFi UE':~ F'??=!!.~1:='?'= :~!!!!•!!i! i++ AP totals 1,x!!1.54 0.00 Lr+dir,~l l•~a{ ante: 1,201.54 c.r~.6:.0.51107•r~!r!r•C:c•ntractor•s•Fees ...........................................................Ge~~Innrf~Q,L~alance................0.U0.. REF-ThAN-JCtUR ke ~ ease C('GLR8U0-y Lr: r.•1 C~..;;uL for e.! LEE ANN r. 10:29:24 `14 AUG 1':,:' • Rcpart GLRTRSUM Fun 1 T!ndu of VAIL l4 AUG 1•~•~V r'a9e • GENERAL REC REVENUE:.' E;;F'ENDITUkES YID - LAUk1E A'dnlU'oFiLfJ for the per rc'd endrna U,c:!:1;"u Account 3 Account Descrrptran/ hunnin3 Pal. .'r Trans MontA, System, F'ost Type, Trans Code/Trans Date, Reference L<eginnrn•a Gal. Det'its Cr=flits Endin3 Balance • Mar- AP AF•CA A Clarm entry, accrual 1.~~?U.Urr 2!ru.UO 1,a00.U0 • 0;~/14/9ir VN=EAI DESi.=REGISrkATIuN - PHILLJ`b 7R~!U1 1=!r=~!~c•_~c• ~'.'lr.UU !i3/I4/'30 VN=EAI UESC=REGIS7RATICrN - F'I~rVLLIS iNirUT F•O=U;_c'%:_ ~r.ri~,i?U 0:3/23/90 VN=C: _i S VIDEO PRODUCT DESC=ADVANCE PMT/I~OT SUMMER NTS 5 F•r?=IJ3~~•~='r' 1,4!'v.l'!! • Apr AP AF'CA A Claim entry, accrual I,~`~r'.'!V rr.!'V 1,250.00 04/20/90 VN=PRO EVENT DESC.=Hill SUMMER NIGHTS-L.AR~A GOfJFI PO=Irv,.'_~!rl 7`_:i'.VU • U4/25/9U VN=SINS, LAMAR DESC'=REIMEUkSkMENi/US CANOE ASS!r P0=lr:.:vti!~ 115.0! 04/27/9l'r VN=PRO EVENT DESC=HOT SUMt4E.F; NIGHTS/1ARLA GONH _76.!}11 05/UT/90 VN=EVES F'RINT SHGP DESC=HOT SUMMER NIGHTS LGGO PREP' F'0=0.:a_r_•Z IV.OU • Apr AP AFVC A A/F' Vi'ids n.nn 75p,nr? <T50.00i U4/LO/'>U 1:=UU>::4'~1VMkU VN=F'RCr EVENT May AF APCA A Clarrn entry, accrual =.°.~~_.4': 'r./!!r 8,52L.46 r;r5/OL!'~0 VN=BARONI, TONY DESC =MAY L6 SOUND tC~UIF' R;NfAL I-'O=('34!i:!. 5:i.!'0 • 05/02/90 VN=GARONI, TONY DLSC-=MAY Le•TN EVIJIf' REIJIAL F•ir=(r_:4ij.c: 11~.`_'!r 05/OL/'±O VN=FIRSTErAN1 OF VAIL DESC=WIRE TRAN'3~ ER: II!~WARD SAVING F•ir=u.~41 4 1, iSU.ir!' 05/07/'?0 VN=PRO EVENT DESC=HOT SUMMEF; N1GH7S - THE SU[:U F'0=V'3510 1,125.00 • li5iU7/'~O VN=F'RO EVENT DESC=HOT :;UMMER NIGHTS - TINY C<AR F'O=!i.::::::U_ 1,1~F.Vir 05/0>ti/'?0 VN=FRO EVENT DESC=HO-f SUMMEF NIGHTS-NELSON RAN I='ir=V ~4~~'7 F_Irlr.Vl? L- I:r5/[t/?V VN=RESORT INDUSTRIES DESC=SYPHONY OF SF'OkTS l'1DL~)S P0=!'.4:_4!i :=:`.i'i''`J/g SC~S G~CC~~GUJI~ Ll•~ • 05/22/90 VN=VAJL VALLEY FOUNDATI DE'~C=DAMAGE DEFOS'Ii;FOhP AMF'HI-iH FU=~!_•4%5!7 1,511u.00 ~~uS~cd 05/24/•?U VN=U. S. CANOE ° k:AYAh DESC=APPEARANCE f'EE/TRnvEL E;:f-'tN^. F•O=U:_:•1•~"'F ~,~ri'O.I:r!i U5/25190 VN=D!iLIG'LE'TREE DESC=HOSPITALITY RECC•F'iION US CAN P0=0''••1?<:[+ ~7J.'='.'_~ • Jun AP AF•CA A Claim entry, accrual _;,=71.19 ir.0!i 3,:371.19 ire./07/'?V VN=MILHOAN, RANDY DESC.=kAYAh: POS"iERS FO=0'?E~3~!• 1~•c•.1'~ • O6/07/9U VN=RAFT'MEISiER UESC=LACES FOR f:AYAI:: F_VENT F0=4353.7 iV.UO O6/12/9V VN=F'RO EVENT DESC=k:ARLA Gr?NHOFF/2ND f'M7 FO=O?5_i31 '-•7F.Ui+ 06/13/90 VN=GUAYLE, BRAD UESC=HOT SUMMEk NIGHTS SHAHFUCUJN FU=V~:'?_<:~~ I,USU.'1U • Oh/13/90 VN=TOUR CONSULT ANiB,INC DESC=HOT SUMMEF; NIGHTS kARLA GUNir Fir=ir34137 1,75!r.u0 Jul AF AFCA A Claim entry, accrual c•.~74.~~ 400.Lr1? 5,876.05 • 07/V4/9U VN=C S V1DE0 PR000C7 DESC'=JULY 1~/HOT SUMMER NIGHf'o T••ii=n3~r.00 ZvV.lrlr V7/Oe/90 VN=F'RO EVENT DESC=H01 SUMMER NIGHIS-NELSON kAN F'U='):=:4~~;:_: 5irir,(rU 07/12/90 VN=FIRSl6ANY.' OF VAIL DESC=HirT SUMMEF; NIGNTS!k.ARLA BUN!r F'~!=!rli4_7 I,TS~r.oV • U7/1L/•~O VN=~IUAVLE, BkAD UESC=HOT SUMMEk NIGHTS TANFJEk 3. Z F'O=U:41t•2 1,'~:VU.1?Ir U7/~o/'?U 051150 ~!rir.1-'U 07/26/90 YN=DOURLE7REE UESC=F;AYA1.: TEAM REC:EF'T1CIN/AUDT'L F'r?=0~°_'872 74.05 • OT/26/'a0 VN=HILTON WHITE-PIANO DESC=PIANir TUNE-HOT SIJMMER NIGHF- PO=ir372~7 75.1.10 07/c6/`r r? VN=F'k0 EVENT DESC=HOT SUMMER NIGHTS - TINY BAR Pir=O'38i1'~ 1,1~5.UV l1T/27/:?0 VN=BRAVO! COLORADO DESC=PIAfJp kENTAL/1~ 60NirFF CONCEk F!i=Ur7~7 35U.!i!i • OT/~T/~?0 051150 ~ ~UO.lil? V7/30/'.?ll VN=C F S VID[0 PRODUCT DESC=JULti 2/_•, 1990 HCr7 SUMMEI; NIG F'!1=U::~::r[ 20'!.!!0 0//30/90 VN=C R S VIDEO PRODUCT DESC=JULY 26, 199u NOT SUMMEk NIG Pli=!i:~r••02 20U•('U • 07/30/90 VN=C 3. S VIDEO PRUDUC:T DES:=JULYL1::, 1'~'?U HOT ::UMMEF; NIG F'i~=U?~c'i': ~U'r.VO - 07/30/90 VN=C S VIDECr PRODUCT UESC=EI?UIF',Br?N!iFF,TINY BARE, 511C{UU F-O=v X717:=: 41!U.'?0 REP-IRAN-JOUR Release I:CGLR8U0-a Ry r:t Cl-36L for 41 LfE ANN oa 10: t9: 24 14 AUG 1950 keport GLRTRSUM Run 1 TOWN OF VA[l 14 AUG i990 Fage 10 • GENERAL REC REVENUES 3 E::PENDITURES YTD - LAUk1E ASMlISSEN fnr the per-io,i end,n•a ti+;;::1:'.'9 • Account ~ Account Description/ Running Sal. or ' Trans Month, System, Fast Type, Trans Code/7rans Uate, Reference Begrr,niny Bal. I?eGitS - -C:r•edits Ending Balance . Jul AF APVC A A/F Voids u.!i! 1,iF0.uu i1 ,750.00> 06/13/90 C1~=OGS:~r,OVMRD VN=POUR C!itJ5UL1'ANTS,INI: 1, 75!i.VO ! • Aug AF AFCA A Claim entry, accrual 1,~a4.•?U u.++u 1,344.90 08/01/90 VN=C R 5 VIDEO PkuDUCT DESC=AUGUS7.:, 1'?'?0 H,IT SUMMEk NI F'U=i~::ic•0; ,::!~O.ui~ . 0$/02/90 VN=k:ELLAM, JOANN DESC=UOG OBEUTANCE INSiF:IJCTrJR FO=05:'4'?9 X47.5!, OS/l75/'?0 VN=C [G S VIDEO FRODUC7 UF:SC=AUGUS7 'a, 1'?'?0 NOT SUMMEk NIG F•i1=1i,i~nQq ~li!i.n!i Oi~/06/90 VN=UOUBLETREE UEi;C.=L ODG1NGik.IkS1EN BRi+WN Pp=C+~7.'_~;7 ~17,4U • OS/O6/y0 VN=FCr;: SECURITY DESC=SECURITY-FiOT SUMMEk NIiiHTS PO=O::Tt.16 2:84.0+) OR/06/90 VN=FOX uEC'URITY UE'BC=SEC:URITV-HO'f SUMMLF; NIGHTS J PO=U::7r:17 ::~~u.Vn 0$/U6/94 VN=F'O): SECURITY UESC:=•SEC.UkITY°FiUT SUMMEk NIGHTS J FU=G3761F: 31•S.vv • AF tota 15 t~,S64.F;+ 10!i.00 May GL 17 A Journal entry ^5:=:.:~" t ~"5.C!r:r t731.11> - OTfO?/'?0 JE=i+05013V REF=R/G SYPN SPORTS EXP TO Cr)kF;ECT ACCT -~`.u0 . 07/V9/9O JE=005014V kEF=R/C HOT SUMMEk NIS DAMAGE DEP TO lZU15 1,6+)O.vU((rt/C ru71/ i'QCGIv'e • 0£t/O7/9U JE=005018V RE'F=R/G CANOE/KAYAK EXP T'0 o=,:i0 ?'~'-'•!''O b~,J~-Fyayyl GL totals =.5=.2'? 1,`~::5.u0 ' En~liny C:~rlar,ce: 19,633.48 60. 6330.52401.(r0U•Faad•Supplies ..........................................................~.c~lnnlf•_Y,E~„lance............... .0.00•• FeD AP APCA A Claim entry, accrual !'.0+) 352.9A • 02/Z3/90 VN=MUN7CIFAL TOY CO DESC=EASTER EGG HUN'i SUFF'LIES FO-u.'-.~1~~_• :~1~.!!u 02/28/90 VN=WAL-MART STORES UF.,C=EASiEk EGG NUN7 t'~•?i+ A';SCrkTE PO=0~~L1=: S40.i3 Jul AP AFCA A Claim entry, accrual O.uO 57.25 O7/2G/'?0 VN-SAFEWAY DESC:=FiiC+D/BuNOFF CGNC'EkT Fu=U _:IL:1 5T.~5 AP totals 41!i.~:~ t::nding Balance: 410.23 • a0 6:~:;0 52416 1100 Misc. Operating Supplies Ce9inninv [~afance: 0.00 Apr AP AFCA A Claim entry, accrual :':9.C+7 !i.Uir x39.07 • 05/-07-/-90-UN-=kO-DEO-F'R-I-NTERS----DE5!==ROAD-RAG-I-NG-G-I-[~-~ ----F'+)=ua~-r.-1. ~=3':'.-C+7 - AP t o t a I s ~S/g Ql.1h?11 ~q f~11 ~ " LUG ~ ~ ~ Gcli 1•Lt $ ~C~, - - Q J Lndi,~y C~•rlance: 339.07 • 60 ~~;'30 5285tT Oui+ Miscellaneous Be•ainniny L:atance: 0.00 Apr AP APCA A Glaim entry, accrual !+.uU 235.OU • 04/18/90 VN=ASC'AP UESC.=LICENSE FEE "HO'I SUMMEF; NIiiH FC,=u::7'?~ i."~.U!• REP-TRAN-JOUR Release CCGLR$00-9 ry %•I C!:.GL for 6•I L.EE, riNN on t,.~s29s24 14 AU8 1990 Report GLRTRSUM Run 1 Tr?WN OF VAIL 14 AUG 19'?U Fage 17 • GENERAL REC REVENUES ,g EXPENDITURES YTD - LAURIE A~MUSSEN FGr the period ending !r l/':!U AccGUrlt 3 Account Description/ Running Bal. or • Trans Month, System, Fost Type, Trans Code/Trans Date, Reference L'e;linnrng Gal. DeGits Credits Ending.Balance • Jun AF AFCA A Claim entry, accrual 10.!i0 !i.UO lO.UU Oti/1~/90 VN=ASC:AP DE;iC=LICENSE FEEiHI_lT SUMMER NIGHT' F!i=i, 5: t5 lO.Or~ • ' Jul AF' AFCA A Claim entry, accrual 1::~~.Ov O.Oi• 18.00 07/6/°0 VN=VAIL RESORT AS50C UESC=VAIL AMEFcICA DAYS T-SHIRTS { F,?=!,;11 15u.!IU . O7/~4/'~0 VN=VAIL PRINTING DESC=HO1 '~UMInER NIGHTS-ili:r.i_TS, T F•O=C,=:71~!, _~.0~~ AF' t~•ta l s 4CT il.l.~li • E:nJin;a i:alance: 427.00 ti 0330 +**sa *••aSpecial Programs 0.!!v ~v,l~;'!.:_._ 4,r..:Ft.i~O 21,47 .32 60 ti360 51103 000 Adver-tisin• C:eyinn n_a Ral~.nce: .00 • pr AF AFCA A Claim en ry, accrual ?:,!,,C~ir 0.l, i 93 .GO 04/10/'?0 VN=ROC:k:V MTN S ORTS F D SC=ADVERT ISING AGREEMEN•i F4=0 _ :E•~l ~!3!!.1~! • J n AF AFCA A Claim en ry, accrual ~~5.!il 0. .0 ZZ .00 )6/13/90 VN=UF THE CRE Y, PAPER DE C:=AD/MAIL MTN RUNNERS FO=u=F~•':!7 ~~F•.V . Ju AF' AFCA A Claim a try, accrual 1, 7'<~.1~' 0!i 1,78 .6T ir7/0'?/':!U VN=SC:REEN F'RI T DESIGiJ DES =1/2 fAARO,Tl~1?N T-SHIFTS 1'0=:!::r•F~~ l,r_;~.or • '?=7.07 Ij !IO +f+ AF' totals tnd ny Gdl~rnc?: x,937 c•T • 60 63t•0 52401 000 Foud Su plies C-:egrnnir,y L'alance: r.OU • Jul AP AFCA A Claim ntry, accrual •1<:'?.77 15'=! 00 31 .77 07/0: /90 VN=CIRRIS!iN D ST DESC'= EEF't/HILL C'LIMCi F•!i=V_?r•S•1"! _~:'?.0!~ • 07/0'? 90 VN=ORRISON D ST UESC=C 'l:U1T ON UEF'!i'IT FCr=!!_=.;E:47 15'' 00 07/09 '?0 VN=:iAFEWAV DESC=F r!iU/HILL CL1MG F'O=V.?c•5'?` l ~1 .2 07/09/ U VN=WESTERN S OFE SUFFLI DESC=Sr DAiH1LL CLIME F'Cr=ri:~:~`•37 • Aug AF AP A A Claim ntry, accrual (I• Ir> )•50 03/06/90 VN=WESTERN S OFE SUFPLI UF..SC=FO /RUNNING RACES F•r+=ri::7F•;7 u.~",0 • tGtd 5 _ _ End rl, L'alance: 40 .27 • 00 6360 F241c. i1ri0 isc. O erating Supplies L~?yl Wing balance: 0.00 • , Jdn AF' AFCA A C -Im entry, accrual -~'>'e•. 0.00 3'4.18 U1/17/'?0 V1J=SCREE =RINT DESIGN DLSC'=FRIGID h 3HIRTc F!.=!,_:!~: __:.uu • REF-IRAN-JOUR kelease iC'GLkS'gU-•~ l:y 51 CCShL !•?r- ;1 L.Ef ~IJTJ on 10:x'•':24 4 UG 1990 Q r- PRELIMINARY LIST - 1991 BUDGET COMPONENTS i 1. VMRD 1991 Departmental goals 2. Detail Justification -Revenue -Projected participation ~ -Projected prices -Expenditures -Basis for projection -Quantities -Past history -Payroll -Contingencies 3. Line Item Summary -By Account 4. Summary Budget (lotus report) 5. Capital Reserve Accurals/Expenditures -Capital project prioritization 6. Proposed User Fees -Include 1989 and 1990 user fees for comparlison 7. Payroll Advice -Part time and seasonal employees -Full time employee compensation and benefits -Proposed 1991 Salary ranges 8. Staff Budget Recommendations NOTE: This list of budget items has been included at this time to make the Board aware of what is included in the budget packet. If there are specific types of information desired that d'~o not appear to be listed here, please let them be known at this time. . ~ Final Budget ~Qmg ~ S Amount VMRD Bud8e1 8,000 A. Sponsorship Eagle County Comm. 150 ' B. Donations Lionshead Merchants Assn. Vail Valley Mkt. Board 200 Total Income 8,350 Fx~ncPC S Amount A. Events 1. Petting Zoo (S days) ~ 2,250 2. Lionshead Children's Tent (to V1tA) 900 . 3. Street Dance SoundlDJ 400 . Hula Dancers 400 Plcxiglass 42 Hawaiian Supplies 145 Cash Prizes 100 Safeway 35.63 Film Develop 58.07 4, VolleyballBBQ Sound 200 Wal Mart 7451 Holsum Bakery 10.35 Wcstcra Slope 147 Safeway 1b.77 B. Miscellaneous Items 1. Advertising: Print Posters 226.20 Flyers 1,141.70 Media Vail Daily (6/29) 119 ' (6/30) 238 Vail Trail 198.40 398.80 2. Logo Contest 100 3. Staff T•Shirts 437.50 4. Balloons Over Vail 640 5. Posterboard 4b.75 Total Expense 8,325.68 . • ~ 4. EQUIPMENT A. The Town hereby transfers to the District for its use during the term hereof the personal property, equipment, and vehicles set forth in Eihibit B hereof. B. Except as otherwise provided for herein, the District shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, motor vehicles, office space, operating and office supplies necessary. to provide the Town with the services contemplated hereunder. All equipment and vehicle maintenance costs shall be the sole responsibility of the District. 5. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TOWN The Town shall provide the District with financial and computer services as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. In addition, the Town shall provide the District with planning services subject to such control and provisions as the Town deems appropriate. The District hall pay no charge for ordinary ongoing day-today planning services, but for services which the Town in its sole discretion deems extraordinary, the District shall pay a rate as I shall be agreed upon by the parties on a case by case basis. Throughout the term of this Agreement the Town shall have the right to use the Apple computer located in the District office on the date of execution hereof or any replacement or substitute therefor, at all reasonable times. 6. HEALTH INSURANCE The District shall be liable for eleven and one-half percenlt (11.57G) of I accrued liabilities of the Town's health insurance plan existing on~December 31, _ 1987 based on the number of eligible District and Town employees asia percentage of the plan's total eligible employees. ~ 7. CONTROL OF THE JOHN DOBSON ICE ARENA The parties understand the John Dobson Ice Arena is a multi-use facility utilized for both recreation and other purposes by the Town, and further understand -7- i • . the Arena is subject to certain terms and conditions contained in a Deed of Gift between the Town and the Websters, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D. The District agrees not to violate any of the terms and conditions of said Deed of Gift during the term hereof. The District's use of the Arena pursuant i to this Agreement shall be subject to all outstanding agreements between the Town and third parties for or relating to the use of the Arena. The District agrees that during the term hereof the District shall allow the following organizations the right to use the Arena free of charge. The District shall allow other nonprofit corporations which are located in the Upper Gore Valley to use the Arena for events that provide a social or cultural benefit to the Town for a fee equal to the costs and expense of staging the event. Battle Mountain High School for graduation ceremonies The District agrees to use its best efforts to maximize the use of the Arena for conventions, meetings, conferences, concerts, and other income producing events during the period it is not required to use the Arena for ice skating by the Deed of Gift. During the term of this Agreement, the Town shall have the right to use the Dobson Ice Arena for a total of thirty (30) days during each year of the term hereof for whatever purposes it deems appropriate upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice of such use to the District. The Town may exercise twenty (20) of said days between March 15 and December 15, and ten (10) of said days between December 15 and March 15. The Town shall be responsible and shall have the right to negotiate all terms and conditions of any activity or event the Town wishes to use the Arena for during said thirty (30) days. The District shall be entitled to receive the gross receipts or rent produced by any such event less all expenses and costs thereof. If the Town makes a good faith decision at a public meeting that the welfare of the Town and its inhabitants requires that the Dobson Arena be utilized -8- entirely for purposes other than recreation, it shall give notice thereof to the . District. The District shall have ninety (90) days from the giving of such notice to vacate the premises in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraph 3A(9)~hereof. 8. RECREATION PLAN During the month of February, 1989, at a~regular or special meeting of the: Town Council of the Town of Vail, and during each subsequent Februaiy during the term of this Agreement, the District shall present a recreation plan to the Town Council detailing the District's fees, budget, plans and programs fir the forthcoming year. The Town Council shall be given the opportunity io critique the plan and suggest changes in the plan to the District. The Districtlshall give due I consideration to all requests of the Town regarding the plan. The District shall base its recreational program for the forthcoming year on said plan) 9. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS, The Town shall contribute to the District the sum of five iundred twenty-two thousand thirty-three dollars 0 522,033) as set forth inlExhibit E hereof for each year during the term of this Agreement to be used by the District exclusively for the provision and development of recreational services, programs, and facilities to the Town. If the Coors Classic is not held withii the Town and if the District does not provide Fourth of July youth programs during any year hereof, the contribution of the Town shall be reduced accordingly. This coltribution shall • ~ be made to the District for each year during the term hereof as follows: A. January - 4X B. February - 296 C. March - 1596 i D. April - 6~ E . May - 696 -9- The Scotts Company ~ and tiubxirliari~x ProTurf W ~.D August 9, 1990 Mr. Ben Krueger Vail Golf Club 292 West Meadow Drive Vail. CO 81657 Vail Board Members: Last fall Ben Krueger, Golf Course Superintendent, applied Scott's FF II Fungicide to greens for prevention of pink and gray snow mold, which can be very devastating. FF II's active ingredient is PCNB, which is an excellent source for control of these two diseases. Ben has had excellent control of the snow molds in the past, so this is what his decision of snow mold products was based on. The greens came out of winter in excellent condition. But when the weather started warming up (early June), small spots resembling dollar spots appeared. I was in the area and had recently been informed by Scott Research that some of the FF II may have been contaminated with atrazine. Atrazine is an herbicide used for control of annual grassy weeds. I explained this to Ben, so we went out to one of the greens where spots were showing up. We took samples and sent them back to Scott Research Department to be tested for any contamination. The test results were positive. As spots continued to show, Ben and his crew started plugging the affected areas. They have been doing this now for about one month. This is probably the best method in remedying the problem. An alternative method would be to apply activated charcoal at a rate of 7 lbs/1,000 sq. ft. to help neutralize the atrazine and then overseed. Be assured that Scotts is standing behind this product issue. We will be compensating your club for time and materials required to get the greens back into shape. Thus far, Ben has received 20 bags HD Starter, 10 bags of HD Super Greens, 25 lbs Penncross bentgrass and 10 bags of Broad Spectrum. In addition, Ben is planning on ordering some topdressing to help smooth the affected areas and the plugging hours will be compensated. The O.M. Scott 6 Sons Company • Hyponex Corporation • 14111 Scottslawn Road • Marysville, OH 43041 • (513) 644-0011 Page 2 It is very unfortunate the problem occurred. Scotts is taking extra precautionary measures so this problem will not occur at an'y time in the future. Scotts prides itself on the quality of product it manufactures, so please be assured Scotts has not taken this problem lightlyjand that the Scott products you now have and will order in the future, will be safe for use. Any questions about this situation, please feel free to contact Scotts directly at 1-8~~-543-~~~i. Sincerely, Rusty etker Senior Technical Representative ROllkr OUODV•VIELE CONSTRUCTION. INC. c August 13, 1990 Mr. Brian Jones Vail Metropolitan Recreation District 292 W. Meadow Drive. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Brian: The following list are warranty items which we will complete by 9/15/90. 1. Touch-up paint on green rails - warranty. 2. Glue carpet at doors - warranty. 3. Urinal leak in men's room - warranty. 4. Repair or replace glass stop at door - warranty. 5. Repair or replace glass stop at door - warranty. 6. Tape drywall patch at attic lid for clock conduit - warranty. 7. DVC will switch door stops/hold open hardware for door mounted & will install. 8. Repaint front door. Misc. items: 1. DVC will pay for electrical bill for clock remote rough-fn. Sincerely, Crai Bruntz Vice President CB/clg General Contractors. Engineers 1000 South Frontage Road West. Suite 202 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-3082 • FAX (303) 476.3423 MEMO TO: Ron Phillips FROM: Brian Jones DATE: August 17, 1990 RE: Ford Park Irrigation System The VMRD Board requested that, attendant to the signing of the TOV/VMRD Addendum, I send you a letter clarifying their understanding of the District's assumption of the Ford Park Irrigation System maintenance. The Board's intent, as I understand it, is to inspect the system and verify that it has been repaired and it is in good working order prior to VMRD's assumption of its maintenance responsibilities. This letter requires no action on your part (unless you think otherwise). Thanks. :sl 1 a ' Follow up items - August 8. 1990 - Board Meetincf 1) July 4th figures - Rick Chastain has. 2) Setup TOV/VMRD Subcommittee Meeting - Need 3 available dates from 2 VMRD Board representatives. Will then try to coordinate with Ron, Jim Gibson and Tom Steinberg. Probably should aim for week of September 17-21. 3) Respond to Audit Points - will do as soon as I can (in writing). I want to give it some thought. 4) Discrepancy between 89 and 90 Golf Pro Shop expenses - see financial report. 5) Golf Cart Analysis (lease vs purchase) - Bruce and Brian will do. 6) Letter regarding Boards' Intent to Inspect Irrigation System before acceptance - done. Sent to Ron (copy attached). 7) Schedule meeting with Bob Barrett - Barrett will be in town Labor Day weekend. He can meet Friday, August 31, at or after 3:00 P.M. 8) Euro-Faire Contract - It does not appear that the proposed LaCrosse Tournament dates would conflict with Euro-Faire. Dates committed to by VMRD for Euro-Faire are: July i1-15, 1991; July 9-13, 1992; July 8-12, 1993; (As I understand it, Euro-Faire is now in breach of contract, thereby rendering the contract null and void.) Steve Foster will pursue a multiple- year contract with Jim Soran. - '~y town ofi uaii 75 south frontage road vall, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2107 office of town attorney August 20, 1990 Mr. Abraham L. Shapiro A.L. Shapiro & Company P. 0. Box 5640 Avon, Colorado 81620 Dear Mr. Shapiro: The Town Council has requested that I respond to your letter of August 8, 1990 and your letter of August 14, 1990. As you are aware at the present time, the Agricultural/Open Space zone district would allow one residence not to exceed 2,000 square feet in GRFA on your property. The Council has not yet made a decision whether or not to amend the Agricultural/Open Space zone district in any way. Should the Agricultural/Open Space zone district be amended prior to the time any development rights you may have on the property "vest" under Colorado law, the amendment will be effective as it relates to your property as well as all other property zoned Agricultural/Open Space in the Town of Vail. You raised the question as to whether or not it would be possible to, in some way, grandfather your property even if your development rights have not yet vested under Colorado law so that your property would not be affected by any amendment to the Agricultural/Open Space zone district. The Town Council at its Work Session meeting of August 7, 1990, did not commit to a "grandfathering" of your property but requested that I look into the matter further. You certainly have the right to proceed with your plans to develop your property and incur whatever expenses you wish, however, the Town Council cannot guarantee to you at the present time that the land shall stay as presently zoned or that if the zoning on the land is changed your property will be "grandfathered." Mr. Abraham L. Shapiro August 20, 1990 Page 2 In your letter of August 14, you requested the Town Council consider permitting you to construct a home that contains more than 2,000 square feet of GRFA on your property. The Council is not in a position to grant this request at the present time. There are two procedures you may follow in an attempt to obtain the right to construct a home with more than 2,000 square feet of GRFA. The first is a variance procedure to obtain relief from the requirements of the Agricultural/Open Space zone district as it now stands. A variance request is heard by the Planning and Environmental Commission and is subject to appeal to the Town Council. The second possibility is to request an amendment to the Agricultural/Open Space zone district which would eliminate the 2,000 square foot requirement. This procedure requires passage of an ordinance by the Town Council. For your information, there is no way that the Town Council may amend the Agricultural/Open Space zone district by a resolution at a Town Council Work Session. Such a change must occur as previously stated through the passage of an ordinance at a regular or special Town Council meeting. If you have any questions concerning these matters, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Lawrence A. Eskwith Town Attorney LAE/bsc RESOLUTION N0. 21 Series of 1990 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE BLACK LAKES RESERVOIR PROJECT PROPOSED BY THE VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT, WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District (VUCWD) has submitted an application to Eagle County for a 1041 permit to enlarge Black Lake No. 1, located near Vail Pass, to accommodate an additional two hundred twenty-seven (227) acre feet of water storage capacity; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail approved Resolution No. 6, Series of 1988, in support of the proposed Black Lakes Reservoir Project, subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the VUCWD has participated with the Town of Vail and Trout Unlimited in a stream habitat improvement program for Gore Creek and contributed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) to that program; and WHEREAS, the operation of the proposed Black Lakes Reservoir Project has been modified, with the support of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, so as to optimize the use of project water for fishery benefits during the winter low flow period; and WHEREAS, the UVCWD augmentation plan, as decreed by the District Court for Water Division No. 5 in Case No. 82CW328, contains a clause which would allow the Town of Vail to reopen consideration of the plan if the Council finds the project does not operate as anticipated and stream flows have dropped below those expected, resulting in damage to the fish population or other forms of adverse impacts; and WHEREAS, the VUCWD has proposed mitigation of 4.5 acres of wetlands lost at Black Lakes with measures that will restore and enhance over ten (10) acres of wetlands within the Gore Creek Valley to the benefit of riparian habitats, fisheries, water quality, and scenic and heritage values; and WHEREAS, the VUCWD has implemented a comprehensive water conservation plan to encourage efficient utilization of water resources for all uses within the Vail Valley; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, that the Town Council supports the development of the Black Lakes enlargement project with the following conditions: 1. The VUCWD shall be responsible for restocking fish in Gore Creek if a significant fish kill occurs through the diversion of water from Gore Creek. The Colorado Division of Wildlife shall be solely responsible for determining when a i significant fish kill occurs. The fish stocking program shall be done in accordance with direction given by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. 2. The UVCWD shall enter into an agreement with the Town of Vail committing to the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 1 hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Vail believes that the UVCWD has met reasonable standards for protection of the environment in planning for the development of the Black Lakes project. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of August 1990. I Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk I i -2- MEMORANDUM T0: Kent Rose FROM: Ron Phillips DATE: August 24, 1990 SUBJECT: Community Development Policy Some Councilmembers and staff have been hearing criticism from people in the community of the Community Development Department along the lines that the "Community Development Department is not being cooperative," "It takes far too long to get a project through Community Development," "It used to be much easier to get projects through Community Development," "Community Development is red tagging too many projects," etc. I think there are a number of reasons for these perceptions which want I want to share in this memo as you requested. Under previous Councils over the last five or six years, the Town staff has been given very clear direction that we should do everything within our power and within the law to expedite development projects and to implement administrative procedures which made it easier and simpler for people to get projects approved and building permits issued. The staff implemented a number of administrative changes to accomplish that including a fast track plan approval process so that developers and builders could begin construction on projects without having all the working drawings approved. Under this scenario, the Building Department would approve the initial working drawings for excavation, foundations, etc., and would review and approve final drawings on other phases of a project as the architect would get them completed. Over the past nine to twelve months, we have run into a few issues where the fast track process led to problems with a few projects. The Byrne garage on Forest Road and the Chester house are two examples of those issues. The Town Council has expressed dismay at those issues arising, and I gave the Community Development Department clear direction in writing on September 21, 1989 that we should take a harder line on problems such as these when they arise and red tag projects that are out of compliance. Previously, we had tried to give the builder or developer a chance to work out the problem before stopping work on a project. We have also seen the Town Council take a harder line on some development projects and are interpreting from some of those actions that the Council wants the Community Development Department to be more thorough and to have everything in line before building permits are issued. As a result, we have been doing more thorough GRFA checks on projects before they are approved and have been doing more thorough building inspection checks in the field than previously was the case. As a result, we have had five projects in the last 30 days which have been red tagged. It also should be recognized that for a six month period, the Community Development Department was short of staff because of staff turnover and that only in mid-July were we again fully staffed. With three new planners plus a new building inspector, _ Memorandum: Kent Rose August 24, 1990 Page 2 it takes some time to get the new people oriented to the system and have the entire department back up to full speed in dealing with projects and issues. I go through this explanation of process to illustrate that I think it is time for the Council to make a clear statement to the community and the staff about what the Council's expectations are in the Community Development process. We had direction from previous Councils to make the process easy and to facilitate construction as much as possible, but over the past nine to 12 months, we have been getting some signals from the Council indicating that enforcement is a priority and stopping projects that are not in compliance with building permits is appropriate. We would appreciate the Council dealing with this issue and giving us a statement of direction so that we clearly understand the Council's desires in this regard and so the community understands why the staff posture may be different than it has been in the last few years. Another issue which indicates some change of policy is the issue of longer and more involved PEC and DRB reports to Council, as well as the Council calling up more projects for review than has occurred in the past. The staff suggests that if it is the Council's intention to call up a project, that the action be taken fairly quickly in a work session so that projects are not reheard in a work session without adequate notice being given to all concerned parties. A couple of other concerns with too many projects being called up by the Council are that: 1) The process outlined in the Charter of using commissions and boards begins to break down somewhat as the members of those boards feel their efforts are less and less worthwhile; and 2) the staff process we now have which encourages developers and builders to go through a lot of changes to bring proposals into compliance before even going to Planning Commission or DRB will start to deteriorate as developers and builders see that all the decision making is shifting to the Town Council level. This encourages applicants to submit whatever they want, ignore the staff and appointed board process, even if they experience denials or recommended denials at that level, and fight the whole battle at the Council level. Please understand this memo is not intended to be critical of anyone or any group, but is simply pointing out some changes which are occurring .and requesting further communication and direction from the Council on these issues. The Town staff will be happy to be responsive to whatever direction the Town Council desires to give in these matters. RUP/bsc cc: Town Councilmembers