Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-04 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 7:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 2. Action on Proposed 1990-91 Parking Policies 3. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance designating an underlying zone district of public accommodation to all of Lot 4 and Lot 7, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Third Filing, a subdivision recorded in Book 221 at Page 992 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records, part of Lot C, Morcus subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255, at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records and an underlying zone district of high density multiple family to all of Lot D and a part of Lot C, Morcus subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255 at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records to Special Development District No. 7, commonly referred to as the Marriott Mark Resort; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 4. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance amending Special Development District No. 7, commonly referred to as the Marriott Mark Resort, and the development plan in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Rehearing by Council of Design Review Board Approval of the the Proposed Residence at 3010 Booth Creek Drive (Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 11th Filing) (Applicant: George P. Caulkins, Jr.) 6. Appointment of a Design Review Board Member 7. Adjournment VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 7:30 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 7:45 2. Action on Proposed 1990-91 Parking Policies Stan Berryman Ron Phillips Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify the proposed policies. Background Rationale: Per Council direction after the August 7 meeting, staff and Councilmembers prepared several alternative proposals. These proposals were discussed at the August 23 meeting of the Transportation and Parking Advisory Committee. The Committee unanimously supported the parking policies contained in the proposed Policy Statement 90-1 (enclosed). Staff Recommendation: Approve Policy Statement 90-1. 8:15 3. Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1990, first reading, an Kristan Pritz ordinance designating an underlying zone district for the Marriott's Mark Resort Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1990, on first reading, which applies two underlying zone districts to SDD No. 7, Marriott's Mark Resort. Background Rationale: On August 27, 1990, the PEC reviewed this application. A motion was made by Kathy Warren and a second was made by Dalton Williams to approve the request. The motion passed 5-1-1, with Chuck Crist abstaining, and Connie Knight voting against the request. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 32, Series of 1990, on first reading. 9:15 4. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1990, first reading, an Kristan Pritz ordinance amending Special Development District No. 7, commonly referred to as the Marriott Mark Resort, and the development plan in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1990, on first reading, the amended SDD No. 7. Background Rationale: The applicant is requesting to amend SDD No. 7 to construct 56 timeshare units and 10 employee housing units. This expansion will be located primarily on the existing parking structure. The parking structure will also be amended. Additional landscaping and pedestrian improvements are also proposed. On June 11, 1990, the PEC voted 4 to 1, with Chuck Crist abstaining, to recommend approval of the amendment with conditions. Connie Knight voted against the motion as she believed the additional density and GRFA were inappropriate. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1990, on first reading. 10:15 5. Rehearing by Council of Design Review Board Approval of the Shelly Mello the Proposed Residence at 3010 Booth Creek Drive (Lot 4, Block 3, Vail Village 11th Filing) (Applicant: George P. Caulkins, Jr.) Action Requested of Council: Uphold/overturn DRB's July 11, 1990 approval of this project. Background Rationale: The applicant received final approval from the DRB on July 11, 1990. The DRB vote was 3-0. The approval was appealed by our adjacent property owner and reviewed by Council on August 7, 1990. Council upheld the DRB decision by a vote of 4-3 with the following conditions: 1) a 2 car garage be added to the development plan, 2) a more formalized landscape plan be~submitted, and 3) the window shutters be painted a solid color. On Aug. 7, 1990, the Council rescinded their Aug. 7th vote and voted to rehear the item at the next possible Evening Council meeting. Staff Recommendation: Not applicable. 10:45 6. Appointment of a Design Review Board Member Action Requested of Council: Appoint one member to the DRB. Background Rationale: Jamie McCluskie has resigned his post on the DRB as of August 1, 1990. Jamie is moving out of the Vail Valley. At this time, we have two applicants for the vacancy: Fitzhugh Scott and Sherry Dorward. The appointed applicant will complete Jamie's term ending February, 1991. 10:55 7. Adjournment _2_ ORDINANCE NO. 32 ~ Series of 1990 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AN UNDERLYING ZONE DISTRICT OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION TO ALL OF LOT 4 AND LOT 7, BLOCK 1, VAIL/LIONSHEAD THIRD FILING, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 221 AT PAGE 992 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, CLERK AND RECORDER'S RECORDS, PART OF LOT C, MORCUS SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 255, AT PAGE 70 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, CLERK AND RECORDER'S RECORDS AND AN UNDERLYING ZONE DISTRICT OF HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY TO ALL OF LOT D AND A PART OF LOT C, MORCUS SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 255 AT PAGE 70 OF THE EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, CLERK AND RECORDER'S RECORDS TO SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 7, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS ,THE MARRIOTT MARK RESORT; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the existing Special Development District No. 7, Marriott Mark located on Lots 4, 7, C, D, Block 1, Vail-Lionshead 3rd Filing does not indicate a specific underlying zone district for the purposes of establishing uses and activities for the Special Development District; and WHEREAS, the application has been made by the MK Corporation, Mark Lodge Condominiums, and Mark Resort and Tennis Club to apply underlying zone districts to Special Development District No. 7; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has expressed their desire to clarify the underlying zone district for Special Development District No. 7; and WHEREAS, the application of the High Density Multi-family zone district as underlying zoning to the Special Development District No. 7 will allow the applicant to request the timeshare use for Tract 1 as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the application of High Density Multi-Family as underlying zoning corresponds with the original zoning for Tract 1 as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental Commission on August 27, 1990, held a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendment and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for a zoning amendment as set forth in Chapter 18.66 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been satisfied, and all of the requirements of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail relating to zoning amendments have been fully satisfied. 1 Section 2. The Town Council hereby designates an underlying zone district of Public Accommodation to all of Lot 4 and Lot 7, Block 1,, Vail- ` Lionshead Third Filing, a subdivision recorded in Book 2'21 at Page 992 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records, part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255 at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records referred to as Tract 2 as described in the attached Exhibit B and an underlying zone district of High Density Multiple Family to all of Lot D and a part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255,~at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and•Recorder's records referred to as Tract 1 as described in the attached Exhibit A for Special Development District No. 7, {Marriott Mark Resort). Section 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences; clauses or phrases by declared invalid. Section 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and inhabitants thereof. Section 5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall; not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent, only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. 2 ~ INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of 1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this ordinance on the day of 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk 3 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 27, 1990 RE: A request to apply an underlying zone district of Public Accommodation all of Lot 4 and Lot 7, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Third Filing,, a subdivision recorded in Book 221 at Page 992 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records, part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255 at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records and a request to apply an underlying zone district of High Density Multiple Family to all of Lot D and a part of Lot C, Morcus Subdivision, a subdivision recorded in Book 255, at Page 70 of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder's records. Both properties know as 715 West Lionshead Circle (The Marriott Mark Resort). Applicant: M-K Corporation I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST At the April 23, 1990 Planning and Environmental Commission work session on proposed amendments to SDD No. 7, the PEC recommended that an underlying zone district be clearly .identified for this Special Development District. The Planning and Environmental Commission made this request of the applicant in order to clarify the underlying zone district. The Council has also reviewed the original request to apply underlying zoning. At the July 17, 1990 Council meeting. Council denied the proposal to apply HDMF underlying zoning to the entire SDD. The motion to approve Ordinance 21 was made by Merv Lapin and Seconded by Kent Rose. The motion failed 2-5. Rob Levine and Kent Rose voted in favor of the motion and the remaining five members voted against the motion (please see attached minutes). The applicant is now proposing to apply HDMF underlying zoning to Tract 1 (the western portion of the SDD where the parking structure is located) and Public Accommodation (PA) underlying zoning to Tract 2, the remainder of the SDD. Please see Jay Peterson's attached letter stating the rationale for the request. 1 - a An underlying zone district is defined in Section 18.40.020, Definitions D as: "Underlying Zone District" shall mean the zone district existing on the property, or imposed on the property at the time that the Special Development District is approved. As stated in previous memos, there is some question as to "what the underlying .zoning was when this Special Development District was approved in 1977. (Please see Section II for background and staff research on the underlying zone). A second reason for applying HDMF zoning to Tract 1 is to allow for the timeshare use. fihe HDMF zone district is the only zone district within the Town of Vail that allows timeshare as-a conditional use. In Section 18.40.070 Uses of the Special Development District it states: Determination of penaitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council as a part of the formal review of .the proposed development plan. Unless further restricted. by the review of the proposed Special Development District, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those permitted, conditional and accessory uses in a properties underlvincf zone district... In summary, the purpose of applying HDMF and PA zoning to the property is to clarify the underlying zone district for the entire SDD, allow. for the timeshare use, specifically for the 56 unit timeshare expansion on Tract 1, and to also provide a guide for any future proposals that may be submitted to the Town. II. BACKGROUND RESEARCH ON THE UNDERLYING ZONE DISTRICT FOR SDD NO. 7 The staff has pieced together a sequence of events relating to the Marriott Mark Resort property. We must emphasize that this information was taken from the Community Development Department files and is not conclusive. Below is a summary of this research. 1973 The Mark Resort constructed 74 hotel rooms and 14 condominium apartments. This original development (east building).is referenced as having~HDMF .zoning in an Environmental Impact Report prepared by John Ryan dated January, 1977 (pg 36). A building permit dated May 31, 1973 also references HDMF zoning. 2 1977 Ordinance 3 of 1977 rezones Lots 4 and 7 and a y portion of Lots 5 and 6, Block 2 Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing from Public Accommodation and HDMF to Special Development District to allow the development of the site "in a more innovative manner". However, in reviewing planner staff zone checks in the file, Lot 4 is referenced as having HDMF, Lot 5 - HDMF, and Lot 7 - Public Accommodation zoning. Lots 4 and 5 relate to the western portion of the Mark property while Lot 7 appears to be the original lot for the very first building on the eastern portion of the site. 1977 A resubdivision of Lot 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Lionshead 3rd Filing was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission. Please note that the block references are different for the SDD Ordinance and for the resubdivision 1978 A building permit was released for the Mark Resort and Tennis. club which has been referred to as Phase I (second building to the west). 1981 Ordinance No. 25 of 1981 approved a specific development plan for Phase II which allowed for the construction of the convention center, parking structure, two additional tennis courts and allowed 8 fireplaces in 8 dwelling units. 2981 The building permit for the development approved Ordinance No. 25, commonly called Phase II was released. 1985 The request for timesharing for Phase II was denied by the Planning Staff. This request proceeded to Planning Commission and the applicant tabled indefinitely. From this research, it appears that the Special Development .District actually had two underlying zone districts. The eastern Lot 7 had been Public Accommodation Zoning. However, this conflicts with John Ryan's .reference to Lot 7 as being zoned HDMF in his EIR. Lots 4 and 5 which are to the west of Lot 7 appear to have been zoned HDMF. Staff also contacted John Ryan, who prepared the original EIR in 1977, Jim Lamont who_was on the Planning Staff when the Marriott Mark was, reviewed in 1977, Danny Corcoran, surveyor of Eagle Valley Engineering and Tom Briner, Architect for the Marriott Resort and Tennis Club in order to find out any additional zoning information. 3 In discussing the issue with Jim Lamont, he stated that all lots in the Town before 1974 had zoning. He also agreed that the site probably had either Public Accommodation or .HDMF zoning originally or a combination thereof. John Ryan had no recollection of the previous zoning. The other parties contacted were unable to provide the staff, with any definitive underlying zoning information. Suffice it to say, that the western property appears to have been zoned HDMF. In the zoning analysis section of the memo, staff has compared the proposed SDD to HDMF and Public .Accommodation zoning as well as the combined HDMF/PA zoning. The major difference is that Public Accommodation zoning allows for more GRFA per site area (.80) while HDMF allows for a .60 GRFA per site area. In respect to parking, HDMF states that 75$ of the parking must be in a building or screened while PA zoning states that 75$ of the required parking shall be located within the main building and hidden from public view. HDMF also allows for the timeshare use. In all other respects, the two zone districts have basically the same requirements. III. ZONING COMPARISON The existing and proposed Special Development Districts have been compared to the development allowed with underlying zoning on Tract 1 of HDMF and Public Accommodation underlying zoning on Tract 2 on the attached chart. (Please note all calculations include the 10 employee housing units). The existing Special Development District and the proposed SDD both exceed the HDMF and PA maximum allowance of 25 units per acre. The existing SDD has 34 units and the proposed SDD would have 47 units per acre. In respect to GRFA, HDMF allows 41,317 sq. ft. for Tract 1. With Tract 2, PA zoning allows 122,133 sq. ft. for a total of 163,450 sq. ft. The existing SDD has 134,000 sq. ft. of GRFA and the proposed SDD has 196,800 sq. ft. of GRFA. The HDMF/PA zone district allows 127 dwelling units for the site. The existing SDD has 177 dwelling .units and;the proposed SDD would have 243 dwelling units. The height maximum for HDMF or PA is 48 feet. The existing SDD has a height of approximately 85 feet at the highest point while the new SDD expansion area will not exceed 48 feet. 4 In respect to site coverage and landscaping, both the existing SDD and the proposed SDD exceed the requirements for HDMF/PA. The site coverage maximum is 55$ for HDMF or PA.. The proposed SDD has 45$ site coverage. The landscaping minimum is~30$ of the site. With the proposed SDD 56$, remains as landscaping. In respect to setbacks, 20 feet is required on all sides of the property. The built SDD encroaches into the setbacks in many areas. The new proposal on the west side of the property encroaches into the 20 foot setback on the western property line where the existing parking structure (setback of 5') is extended to the south. All parking requirements are met per the Town of Vail parking code with the allowance of 5 valet parking spaces. Each timeshare unit has 2 spaces and each employee unit has 1.5 spaces. IV. EVALUATION OF UNDERLYING HDMF ZONE DISTRICT FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 7 A. Suitability of the proposed zoning. The existing zoning is Special Development District for this site. A specific underlying zone district is not identified in the SDD ordinance. For the purpose of clarity, it is appropriate to apply underlying HDMF/PA zoning to the entire SDD. The intent is to not tamper in any way with the existing development on the site but to provide an underlying zone district that can be used. as a guide for the review of any future proposals. In addition, it is appropriate to apply HDMF due to the request for timesharing for Tract 1. Timesharing would not be approved for any other portion of the SDD unless the applicant requested to amend the SDD in the future. B. Is the amendment presentinc a convenient, workable relationshib within land uses consistent with municipal, objectives. Staff prepared a chart titled "Development Analysis" in order to compare the proposed SDD with surrounding properties'. As indicated by this chart, there are a number of properties developed beyond what is proposed on the Marriott site such as the Antlers, Landmark, Vantage Point, Montaneros, Lionsquare Lodge and the Doubletree Hotel. Staff believes that the proposal is in concert with many of the policies outlined in the Land Use Plan. The site is identified as being in the Resort Accommodation and Service Category defined below: 5 I "This area includes activities aimed at accommodating the overnight and short term visitor to the area.- Primary uses include hotels, lodges, service stations, and parking structures (with densities up to 25 dwelling units or 50 accommodation units per buildable acre). These areas are oriented toward vehicular access from I- 70,.with other support commercial and business services included. Also allowed in this category, would be institutional uses and various municipal uses." (Please see Special Development District Memo concerning this project and its relation to the Land Use Plan and surrounding neighborhood). In the Land Use Plan analysis, a development scenario was selected based on market demands and the desires of the citizenry. The Plan states (page 30): "The public input had shown a general satisfaction with the location of existing land uses, which was used as the foundation foe the preferred development alternative..." The most important goals culled from the public meetings were used to formulate the Trends Alternative. These key goals are as follows: A. Commercial Uses 2) Commercial growth should be concentrated primarily in existing commercial areas to accommodate both local and visitor needs. 3) New hotels should continue to be located primarily in the Village and Lionshead areas. C. Village/Lionshead Core Areas 1) Increased density for commercial, residential and lodging uses in the Core areas would be acceptable so long as the existing character of each area is being preserved . This proposal supports the Land Use Plan "key goals" in that the expansion occurs in an already developed area of Lionshead, the uses. proposed support the desire for timeshare, and the design of the proposal is respectful of surrounding properties and the character of the West Lionshead Circle area. 6 C. 'Does the rezoning provide for the growth of an orderly. viable community? The staff believes that the Special Development District expansion does provide for the orderly development of the community. We believe that the project enhances many of the community's goals outlined in the Land Use Plan. The time share use is also specifically given support in the Land Use Plan. The suitability for this property for infill development is discussed in detail in the SDD memo in respect to traffic, density, design etc. which all relate to "orderly development." IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff ,recommends approval of the application of the High Density Multi Family zone district to Tract 1 and Public Accommodation to Tract 2 as underlying zone districts to the Special Development District No. 7. We believe the request meets all of the three criteria for a zoning review. It is our opinion from staff research that the underlying zoning on Tract 1 appears to have been HDMF and Tract 2 appears to have been zoned PA and possibly HDMF. By approving the request, the underlying zoning is clarified for the existing SDD and any possible future SDD amendments. 7 0 ~ W ~ ~ a a p ~ C1p ~ N In O ~ ~ c0- pp > Q V3 to ~ r tt'f W' ~ m N d' m O C N^ N ~ _ 1~ ~ Z ~ o~ o o v a a$ ~ ~ ~ V~j ~ ui ~ ~ ~ o °O ~ ~ ago ~ a~o_ D ~ ch . ~ _ so ch c~ N: ; F- Q:G.. o r ~ ~ ~ ~ c 'L o' c c e ~ I-_ Z o ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ 5T r ~ ~ N O ~ . ~ t0 to N ~ O . N : N O ~ a~ U;~ Q ;2 a~ ~ ' , ~ F-, , N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ d~ ~ Q Q. ch ~ N C r O ~ tOC H ~ O O N ~ ~ O ~ n' ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ 0 ~ r ~ J ~ N O .Y Q ~ i r co C~ cT~ tOA C~D ~ ` M ~ N N ~ : ~ 0 O a . co _ _ ~ C7 ~ c c W Z Y N v Q Y ~ n`~.w cvn a ~a n~ = o m Y rN z c z~ w Z ~ a Z ~ m tr0 . ~ CNi ~ < aNO a 'Q Q . ~ ~ v0 9W ~ .Z ~Zz m . _ oCpp • tOD ;iOD. O "N M : O GOD `N . ~ Om0 LL O O O r r ~ C r N 'ef O O a o ~ ~ ~ z: r ¢4 ~ > , o m ~ N t0 GD •tD. h M O O O e+f ' ~ ~ O O 1~ m .r .r . Q! O ~ N O Z 'O t0 t0 GO .N CO O tr0 ~ . ~ ~ W 6 W `Op ~ ~ ~ ~ CnD O O ~ N t O r C7 V N CL L ~ ~ ~t Iq ' M C'') ~ ~ Wt0 N Z r W a Q GD . N O . ,01 ~ N . ~ `ch O .O . ~ `I~ GD a w chi a°o M r ~ ' u~ ° ° a c~*~ ~ u1 ~a ~ ~ Z ~ ti ~ tD ~ ~CO'y QOi O O ~ ' M ~ old! N CE C G O LL~ m N, M N N M ~ t~0 COD tOp S ~ ~ ~ - N ~ « C C7 W ~ ~ c ~ ~ d ~ r 7 C ~ 2 LL--- - - Z QQ G 'd a C c Q N to = U U U U U U d a O p N C E y y 8~ f~ N ~O' O r"' O N 00 N 1~ ' N 1~ ~ m ~j `p~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ M O ~ Q~ Of ' N CO N r S W N t07 ~ ~D M ~ ~ ~ r ~ r 1W ty C p r ~ ~ cw~ ~ W W N N r r r r r C 3~ N a ~ ,y Q ~ ~ ~ ~ W t/1 O N . ~ Oi O~ N ~ ' N tN0 '7 p . d p C G) ~ Z ~ " ~ E ae Q Q Q ~ M r r O' r r CV t+7 N M 1A O G) aU m.G-_' cp EQ Cn~ as om~•o8m Q°C p oo~~ma o Q Y N o o E °~c9 H W ~ N~ O ~ Q c2Sa~i:•c cc~ W ~ C 'C C 0.,,, C ~ ~E~Eacy 0o p~ ~ O 0-~. p ~Z ~omo~u'S p~„O~ tea.°-cam ~ ~n.~ v~,w^0 ~>mm~o r N N C d N~ _ av~ c~c c+d pr a~ - OZ ~a~~a~~~ WW~ war- ~u~~E~:°~m~~.N.o >o-Q ~E~8~~LL cA to N - ~ - d ~ E ~ C N ~ y j ~ W'C « ~Cp.C O N d Q O 00. ~o• •c~°'C~7 ~ ~ Q ~ Q ctl > "2 W ~ J > ~ > 0. W z cu~~n'~: . MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING JULY 17, 1990 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, July 17, 1990, at - 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Rose, Mayor Tom Steinberg, Mayor Pro-Tem Lynn Fritzlen Jim Gibson Merv Lapin Robert LeUine Peggy Osterfoss MEMBERS ABSENT: None TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The first item was a ten year employment anniversary award to Linda Barca. Ron Phillips gave brief background information on Linda who is a Bus Driver with the Public Works/Transportation Department. Skip Gordon made some additional comments, and Mayor Rose thanked Linda for her hard work and her years of service. The next order of business was Citizen Participation. There being none, Council moved on to the third item of business. Item three on the agenda was a Consent Agenda. Based on Council request, Mayor Rose stated all items would be handled separately. Item A was Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 10, Series of 1990, Special Development District No. 4, Section 18.46.100 C, Density Floor Area, Area C Glen Lyon duplex lots to provide for gross residential floor area to be calculated per the requirement of the primary/secondary zone district Section 18.13.080 Density Control; and setting forth details in regard thereto (Applicant: 75% of Glen Lyon subdivision property owners). The title was read in full by Mayor Rose. Kristan Pritz and Shelly Mello made a brief presentation. Jim Gibson stated concerns regarding additional GRFA requests, with Shelly responding that this change was in total conformity with current zoning and lot size. Shelly Mello stated there had been no specific reason for the 4,200 square foot restriction on GRFA in regards to negotiation issue, and that the developer had voluntarily agreed to this provision in order to ensure the quality of the subdivision. Tom Steinberg moved to approve this ordinance on second reading, with a second coming from Merv Lapin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Item B under the Consent Agenda was Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance amending Section 18.26.040 of the Municipal Code to include as a conditional use "Television Stations" in the Commercial Core II zone district (Applicant: Vail/Beaver Creek Television Network). The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Mike Mollica stated there had been one change only, and that was to "Section I. Definition of TV Stations." Bill Perkins, representing the applicant, stated he did have a question in regard to the term "satellite dish," and further questions on the two foot diameter requirement and exemptions. Further discussion prompted deleting the verbiage for satellite dishes from the end of Section I. Peggy Osterfoss also requested clarification of the production studio and what views would be available to the public. Bill Perkins stated the public would be able to view inside the production equipment with seating provided within the studio, and another studio for taping interviews would be on the walkway immediately to the exterior of that studio space. Rob LeUine moved to pass Ordinance No. 23 on second reading, with a second coming from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Mike Cacioppo spoke against the approval of this ordinance indicating that he had a serious problem with the location of television studios on the first floor level, in that this has previously been reserved for restaurant or retail space and should be the continued use in Commercial Core I and II, and that if the Council were to approve this ordinance, it would "smack of special privilege and election payoffs." Item C under the Consent Agenda was Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance amending SDD No. 23, Vail National Bank, Part of Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village 2nd Filing, 108 South Frontage Road West (Applicant: Vail National Bank Building Corp.). Mayor Rose read the title of the ordinance in full. Mike Mollica indicated numerous changes to the "Whereas" section at the beginning of the ordinance had been included based on a request by Merv Lapin. These changes were to acknowledge the singular and unique situation in which the Bank finds itself. Jim Gibson had questions in regard to future use of this parking facility and the - right-of-reverter clause. Specifically, he asked whether the reverter clause had been lifted, stating the reverter clause was of some issue because if in the future the medical facility were not located on this site or if the structure were destroyed and not to be rebuilt, Vail Associates could once again obtain exclusive use of this portion of land which would then negate any parking arrangement the Vail National Bank Building had with the Medical Center. Larry Lichliter with Vai l Associates acknowledged the reverter clause situation and stated the clause had not been lifted. However, the situation was one with which they had dealt. Following discussion, Rob Levine moved to approve Ordinance No. 25, with a second coming from Kent Rose. At this point, Jay Peterson asked to table this ordinance in order to clarify the reverter clause question. Rob Levine withdrew his motion, and Kent Rose his second. Peggy Osterfoss then moved to table this Ordinance No. 25 to the August 7 meeting, with a second coming from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2, with Tom Steinberg and Merv Lapin opposing. The fourth item of business was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance designating an underlying zone district of high density multi-family to Special Development District No. 7, commonly referred to as the Marriott Mark Resort; and setting forth details in regard thereto (714 West Lionshead Circle, Lots 4, 7, C, D, Block 2, Vail-Lionshead 3rd Filing) (Applicant: M-K Corporation, Mark Lodge Condominiums, and Mark Resort & Tennis Club). Mayor Rose read the full title. Kristan Pritz presented a brief history relating to the application of HDMF zoning to the Special Development District. Because this item had been presented in its entirety at the June 19 evening meeting, Kristan focused on changes that had occurred since that meeting. The GRFA had been reduced to 58,800 square feet, which was a reflection of 56 timesharing units at approximately 1,050 square feet per unit. Ned Gwathmey, architect for the project, explained that a computer analysis presented a refinement of the plan and had altered the original figures and reduced the total GRFA by approximately 8,400 square feet. Kristan explained the consideration of both the Ordinance No. 21, as previously stated, as well as Ordinance No. 22, relating to amending the SDD No. 7 to allow timeshare, could be discussed in the same arena, but she asked specifically that individual votes be taken on each of those ordinances. From research staff had put together, it appeared the SDD actually had two underlying zone districts. The eastern Lot 7 had public accommodation zoning. However, that was in conflict with John Ryan, who had prepared the original EIR in 1977 and referenced Lot 7 as being zoned HDMF in his EIR. Lots 4 and 5, which are to the west of Lot 7, appeared to have been zoned HDMF. Staff recommendation for using the HDMF zone district as an underlying zone district to the SDD No. 7 was then presented. Kristan noted several areas regarding HDMF zoning that made this zoning appear appropriate and applicable to the Marriott site. Merv Lapin then raised the issue about the appropriateness of the HDMF underlying zoning for all three lots at the Marriott site. A discussion ensued and it was pointed out by the Town Attorney that the underlying zoning would affect the uses specifically for the SDD and that the Council should consider the criteria from the Vail Land Use Plan and whether this was a furtherance of that Land Use Plan. At this point, Peter Jamar, Jay Peterson, Kaiser Morcus, Ned Gwathmey, Jeff Jacquard, and John Sweeney were introduced, all as representatives of the Marriott Mark application. Peter Jamar responded to suggestions made by members of the Council at the June 19 meeting and indicated that four revisions, commitments, and clarifications were being proposed in a memo from the applicant dated July 10, 1990. 1. GRFA The previous GRFA total proposed was 71,200 square feet, excluding 4,000 for the ten employee units. After further study and analysis of the floor plan, the applicant proposed to reduce the total to 62,800 square feet. Both figures include the 4,000 square feet for employee units. 2. Architectural features of existing hotel exterior Peter said it had been suggested that in addition to their previous commitment to repaint the exterior of the existing hotel, they would study alterations of the balconies in order to improve the building's appearance. Feeling this was an excellent suggestion on the Council's part, the applicant was investigating various design solutions and agreed to include a new balcony design in the project. -2- 3. Time sharing Due to several questions regarding the timeshare nature of the expansion, the applicant had prepared an informational memorandum addressing specific questions and this was included in the Council packet. 4. Left turn lane As a point of clarification, the applicant fully understood that if for some reason the overall funding strategy for Frontage Road improvements is not _ established prior to issuance of the applicant's certificate of occupancy, the applicant may be responsible for 100% of the cost of the left turn lane off the Frontage Road to West Lionshead Circle with a right of reimbursement for costs exceeding their fair share at some future date should an overall funding mechanism be put into place. Kaiser Morcus stated that a $4.5 million upgrade had been planned for the Marriott facility, and this would include a total refurbishment of the interior as~well as the exterior. As far as maintenance of the new building, Kaiser explained there was a reserve fund that had been established which represented ten percent of the total operating fund to upgrade and maintain the new facility. At this point, Jay Peterson reminded Council that the applicant was establishing underlying zoning and not changing it; that the original zoning had been placed back in 1973. Cindy Jacobson presented comments negative to the granting to the approval of this ordinance. Jim Lamont also spoke about the SDD special laws and whether this was being handled in a procedurally correct manner, he noted that with the two zoning districts involved in this property and the most restrictive use should apply. He stated his concern about fractionalization of accommodation units and protecting the bed base and convention business for the Lionshead area, as well as the Town of Vail. Kaiser Morcus reiterated his desire to cater to convention business. Eric Affeldt spoke in regard to clarification of the underlying zoning being HDMF, and restated the actual locations of the parcels in question. Jim Gibson expressed his concern with Ordinance No. 22, the ordinance allowing timeshare development at the Marriott, and stated the report received from the applicant seemed very subjective. He felt that maintenance of privately owned properties was certainly more desirable than the timeshare scenario. Merv Lapin then made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 21, based on his scrutiny of the surrounding neighborhood and noting that the Vail Spa across the street currently is zoned HDMF, Antlers CCII, and the Enzian CCII. Tom Steinberg seconded this motion. Tom Steinberg then withdrew his second explaining he believed the eastern lot, i.e., the actual Marriott physical facility, was to remain public accommodation, and when he understood this was not so, withdrew his second of that motion. Kent Rose then seconded Merv Lapin's motion to approve Ordinance No. 21. Rob Levine stated that even if the Council approved both Ordinance Nos. 21 and 22 on this evening, if the applicant wanted to do something outside the current SDD, he would have to come in again for a major amendment to the SDD. Merv Lapin called the motion. A vote was taken and the motion failed 2-5, with Rob Levine and Kent Rose voting for approval of Ordinance No. 21, and the remaining five members of Council voting against. Based on this vote, Jay Peterson requested Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1990, be tabled to the next regular meeting of the Vail Town Council, August 7, 1990. Peggy Osterfoss moved to table Ordinance No. 22 to the August 7 meeting, with a second coming from Rob Levine. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Eric Affeldt then requested a synopsis of the vote, with reasons from each of the Councilmembers to explain their votes. Rob Levine stated in order to protect the Town of Vail zoning, the entire parcel, i.e., all lots, HDMF seemed to make the most sense and was a cleaner SDD. There was a process already set up for further review and change and he felt that the Town had explicit protection. Lynn Fritzlen felt it was important to establish underlying zoning, but felt that any increase in bulk and mass should not be addressed on a singular basis. Tom Steinberg felt that having split zoning on the property was inappropriate. Kent Rose felt much the same as Rob Levine, stating that the HDMF already existed on this parcel, and he felt that HDMF for the western parcel was more appropriate and so should be acknowledged as the overall zoning. Merv Lapin stated that he was against timeshare, although he did feel that HDMF was the appropriate zoning for this particular parcel. He stated he was against timesharing because of the numerous foreclosure notices he sees for timeshare owners in Eagle County. Peggy Osterfoss stated she voted against this ordinance because she objected to changing density independent of the approval of the ordinance amending the SDD. Jim Gibson stated he was against the ordinance because of the uncertain quality of timeshare projects, and that HDMF would allow the timeshare use. The time being 10:30 p.m., Mayor Rose called for a five minute break. -3- The next item of business was Ordinance No. 19, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance modifying Section 18.13.080(A) of the Municipal Code of the TOV regarding density control for the primary/secondary zone district (Applicant: Town of Vail). Mayor Rose read the full title of the ordinance. Andy Knudtsen stated this amending ordinance was to correct a typographical error, Mike Cacioppo asked questions in regard to the affect this ordinance would have on his personal property and was satisfied with the input from staff. Tom Steinberg made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 19 on first reading. Lynn Fritzlen seconded that motion. A vote was - taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Next was Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail general fund, capital projects fund, Communities for Drug-Free Eagle Valley fund, special parking assessment fund, Vail marketing fund and the real estate transfer tax fund, of the 1990 budget and the financial plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein. Mayor Rose read the full title. Merv Lapin suggested he ordinarily was not in favor of supplemental appropriation ordinances, but in this case, the majority of items were rollovers from 1989 and passage was appropriate. Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 24, with a second coming from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. The next item of business was Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance amending the plan document of the Town of Vail employees' pension plan; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. Charlie Wick stated that the next three items, Ordinance No. 28, Ordinance No. 29, and Ordinance No. 30 were nearly identical documents, that state law requires separate documents for police and fire as opposed to Town of Vail employees' pension plan, and they must be reviewed independently of each. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 28 on first reading. Lynn Fritzlen seconded that motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Ordinance No. 29, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance amending the Town's Police and Fire pension plan document subject to approval by sixty-five percent (65~) of the Town's Police and Firemen; and setting forth details in regard thereto, was next on the agenda. Mayor Rose read the title in-full. Charlie Wick stated that an election had been held on July 2 and 3, 1990 at the Vail Municipal Building for the Town of Vail and the results were as follows. The Town of Vail has 15 sworn fire personnel with 13 votes cast for amendment six; one vote against amendment six; and one fire personnel not voting; therefore, 93 percent voted for amendment six. In regard to the police election, the Town of Vail has 27 sworn police personnel; 22 votes cast were for amendment six; none voted against amendment six; and five police personnel did not vote; therefore, 82 percent of the sworn police personnel voted for amendment six. In order to pass, 65 percent sworn personnel must vote on an issue. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 29 on first reading, and Lynn Fritzlen seconded that motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Item ten on the agenda was Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance amending the trust agreement pursuant to the Town of Vail employees' pension plan; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The full title was read by Mayor Rose. This amendment allowed UMRD to have a voting member on the Board of Trustees for the Town of Vail Employees' Pension Plan. Merv Lapin moved to approve this ordinance, and Lynn Fritzlen seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 7-0. Item eleven was an appeal of a Planning and Environmental Commission decision regarding the PEC's denial of a request for a height variance for an addition to Condominium Unit E-6, Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st Filing (141 East Meadow Drive - Crossroads Condominiums) (Applicant: Sid Schultz for H. William Smith). Mike Mollica requested that Council uphold or overturn the decision of the PEC. The PEC at their June 25 , 1990, public hearing had unanimously denied the requested height variance, that vote being 6-O. Merv Lapin stated that he owned 50 percent interest in Unit C-1 of Crossroads, which disqualified him from voting on this issue, so he stepped down from the hearing. Tom Steinberg divulged that he had a 3 percent interest in a mortgage in a unit at Crossroads, but did not feel that was a significant conflict, so he opted to vote on the item. Jay Peterson stated he was an attorney representing the applicant, and Sid Schultz was the architect on behalf of the applicant. Some discussion ensued in regard to whether other condominium owners had been notified of this request for the use of their collective GRFA, and Merle Sachnoff, who is secretary of the association, stated letters had been sent out to 22 condominium owners with 20 responding they were in favor of this addition _4_ and two voting against. Rod Slifer spoke on behalf of the applicant, stating it was important to encourage upgrading of older facilities within the Town of Vail. Lynn Fritzlen voiced her discontent with the procedures stating that she would prefer having a policy statement rather than treating this as a singular item. Mike Mollica stated no additional parking requirement would be necessary since the total square feet of the unit, including the addition, would now come to 1,695 square feet. Peggy Osterfoss noted that this was not like other in-fill in the Village, and was more an extension of an existing architectural element. Peggy Osterfoss - moved to uphold the Planning Commission's decision for denial of this request, with a second coming from Kent Rose. Her findings included that this would be a grant of special privilege because the building itself is not a physical hardship. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously 6-0. At this point, Susie Bruce, who was not represented by counsel, requested an audience with the Town Council to discuss the lease for space currently held by the Town of Vail in the Village Inn project. Her questions related to the term of the lease as well as the CPI or adjustment over time. Steve Barwick's recommendation was to compromise, with the market value adjustment after five years. He suggested that an appraiser should evaluate the property. .This would guarantee after a five year period of time, the Town of Vail would be getting its equitable leasehold space amount. The Council unanimously agreed and gave direction to staff to proceed with signing of the lease with Ms. Bruce. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST; Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Pam Brandmeyer -5- h ORDINANCE NO. 22 SERIES OF 1990 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 7 COMMONLY REFERRED, TO AS THE MARRIOTT MARK RESORT AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1N ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS - IN REGARD THERETO WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes Special Development Districts within the Town; and WHEREAS, Special Development District No. 7 for development of Lots 4, 7, C and D, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Third Filing was originally approved by Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1977, and subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1981 and Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1982; and WHEREAS, the Applicant and Owner (M-K Corporation and Marriott Corporation) desire to make amendments to Special Development District No. 7; and WHEREAS, the Amendment to Special Development District No. 7 will insure unified and coordinated development within the Town of Vail in a manner suitable for the area in which it is situated; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the modification to Special Development District No. 7; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate and beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants and visitors to amend Special Development District No. 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: SECTION 1. Amendment procedures fulfilled. Planning Commission report. The approval procedures prescribed in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the report of the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending approval of the proposed development plan for Special Development District No. 7. SECTION 2. Amendment to Prior Ordinances. Amendment Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1977, Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1981 and Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1982 are hereby amended by the addition of Part II to read as follows: A. Special Development District No. 7. Part II of Special Development District No. 7 ("SDD7") and The Development Plan as herein after defined and set forth is hereby approved for the continuing development of Lots 4, 7, C and D, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Third Filing located within the Town of Vail consisting of 5.08 acres (221,527 square feet). 1 a t' B. Puruose. Part II of SDD7 is hereby established to ensure comprehensive development in the use of an area that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town of Vail and the existing SDD7 and to promote the upgrading and redevelopment of a key property in the Town of Vail. The amendment to SDD7 is regarded as complimentary to the Town by the Town Council and meets all design standards as set forth in Section 18.40 of the Municipal Code. There are significant aspects of the Amendment to Special Development District No. 7 which cannot be satisfied through the imposition of the standards in the existing SDD7 or under existing zoning. The amendment to SDD7 is compatible with the upgrading and redevelopment of the community while maintaining its unique character. C. Definitions. 1. Time-Share Estate shall be defined as set forth in Section 18.04.420 of the Town Municipal~Code. 2. Emnlovee Housing Unit shall be defined as follows: A dwelling unit as shown on the Redevelopment Plans, marked as Employee Housing Unit. D. Development Plan. 1. A development plan for Part II of SDD7 is approved and shall constitute the plan for the redevelopment of a portion of SDD7. The redevelopment plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Arnold, Gwathmey & Pratt Architects and Dennis Anderson Associates, Inc. as set forth below: a. Landscape Plan by Dennis Anderson Associates, Inc. dated June 4, 1990. b. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Parking Plans by Arnold, Gwathmey & Pratt Architects dated May 14, 1990. c. Elevations and Sections by Arnold, Gwathmey & Pratt Architects dated May 14, 1990. d. Environmental Impact Report by Peter Jamar Associates, Inc. dated May 10, 1990. The plans listed in 1 through 4 above shall for the purposes of this Ordinance be referred to as "The Development Plan". 2 r 2. The development plan shall adhere to the following: a. Setbacks. Setbacks shall be as noted on the Site Plan listed above. b. Heiaht. Heights of structure shall be as indicated on the elevations listed above but shall not exceed 48 feet measure vertically from existing or finished grade at any given point to the top of the flat roof, mansard roof, or to the highest ridge line of a sloping roof. c. Site Coveraae. Site coverage shall be as indicated on the site plan listed above. d. Landscatnina. The area of the site to be landscaped shall be as indicated on the landscape plan listed above. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for their approval. e. Parking and Loading. Parking and Loading shall be provided as indicated on the site plan and floor plans as listed above. In no case shall the parking provided on the total site as covered by SDD7 be less than 400 spaces. E. Density. The existing development and conditions for SDD7 shall be as defined under Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1977 and under Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1981 and under Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1982. The approval of this Part II of SDD7 shall permit an additional 56 dwelling units which shall be used as time-share estates and 10 dwelling units which shall be used as employee housing units. The 56 dwelling units used for time-share estates shall not exceed 1050 square feet of gross residential floor area per unit for a total of 58,800 square feet of GRFA. The 10 dwelling units used as employee housing shall have a gross residential floor area per unit of approximately 400 square feet, and shall have a maximum total of 4000 square feet of GRFA. F. Permitted, Accessory and Conditional Uses. Time-share Estates and Employee Housing Units shall be the only permitted uses for the 66 dwelling units as set forth in The Development Plans. Accessory and Conditional Uses shall be as set forth in the High Density, Multiple Family Zone District. Any additional requests for time-share units shall require a major amendment to SDD7. 3 y G. Restrictions on Emnlovee Housing Units. 1. No Employee Housing Unit shall be sold, transferred or conveyed unless such sale, transfer or conveyance is to a non-profit Condominium Association formed to manage the 56 time-share estates. 2. No Employee Housing Units shall be leased or rented for any period of less than thirty consecutive days and it shall be rented only to tenants who are full-time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be deemed to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilman, Eagle, Vail, Avon and their surrounding areas. A full time employee is a person who works an average of thirty hours per week. 3. An Employee Housing Unit shall not be divided into any form of time-share estate, interval ownership or fractional fee. 4. The restrictions contained in this Section 23 shall be placed in the Condominium Declaration for the benefit of the Town of Vail and shall not be changed without the consent of the Town of Vail. 5. Each employee dwelling unit shall have a total gross residential floor area of approximately 400 square feet. 6. The owner/applicant shall submit to the Town Attorney a covenant permanently limiting the use of the ten employee dwelling units to long term employee rentals in perpetuity. Once the covenant is approved by the Town Attorney, the agreement shall be filed of record in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder to insure that the restrictions shall run with the land. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit for The Development Plan. The covenant shall include the conditions as set forth in Section 2, Paragraphs G 1-5 above. H. Amendments. Amendments to the approved development plan shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 18.40.100 of the Vail Municipal Code. 4 I. Conditions of Atnnroval for SDD7. 1. A detailed drainage plan and other design issues relevant to public works shall be submitted and approved by the Town of Vail prior to the issuance of a building permit. Pollution control devises shall be incorporated into the parking garage per the submitted environmental impact report. Gore Creek shall be protected from any construction impacts by the use of an erosion control plan. 2. Working in coordination with the Town Staff, the applicant shall fund and conduct a comprehensive traffic study of the West Lionshead Circle area suitable for determining the applicant's contribution to the cost of constructing any necessary turn lanes on the South Frontage Road to West Lionshead Circle. Preliminary design and cost estimates for the turn lanes shall be provided by the applicant. At a minimum the applicant shall be responsible for contributing an amount of money to cover the applicant's share of the cost of the road improvements so determined by the comprehensive traffic study for West Lionshead Circle. 3. A preliminary design and funding strategy for constructing any turn lanes shall be established prior to the issuance of any building permit and the turn lanes shall be completed prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the development plan unless otherwise deferred by the Town of Vail Community Development Department and Public Works. The funding and construction plan must be approved by the Town of Vail engineer, Community Development Department, Town Council and Colorado Division of Highways before the building permit is released for the expansion. The Applicant shall be required to submit a Colorado Department of Highways Access Permit Application on behalf of the Town for the West Lionshead Circle/South Frontage Road Improvement. A signed Colorado Department of Highway permit must be obtained by the applicant before a building permit is released unless such permit is not necessary as confirmed by the Town of Vail Community Development Department and Public Works. 5 4. All aspects related to the time-share estates of this facility shall comply with all applicable Town Ordinances that regulate time-share activity. Time- share estates are only approved for the 56 time-share units. The 10 employee dwelling units shall not be allowed to convert to time-share estates. Time-share units that are not sold for certain weeks shall be made available to the public as short term rentals. 5. Detailed landscaping similar to the Westin Hotel landscaping along the recreation path proposed on Town of Vail property shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town of Vail Landscape Architect and Engineer for approval before such proposal is submitted to the Design Review Board. All landscaping proposed on Town of Vail land shall be maintained by the applicant. 6. The applicant agrees to regrade, revegetate and repair the drainage on the bank adjacent to the bike path along the southern property line of the Marriott Mark Hotel by August 1, 1990. A letter of credit in the amount of $ shall be submitted to the Town of Vail before second reading of this Ordinance. The landscape and drainage work shall be submitted to the Town Engineer, Landscape Architect and Community Development Department for approval before the proposal is presented to Design Review Board. 7. A temporary certificate of occupancy shall not be released for The Development Plan until all site improvements have been completed such as sidewalks, landscaping and drainage as set forth on the development plans. If the weather prohibits the completion of any improvement, the applicant shall be required to provide a letter of credit to cover 125 of the construction costs for these improvements. The construction estimate shall be reviewed ;and approved by the Town Engineer and Landscape Architect. The agreement stipulating how and when the improvements will be completed and the dollar amount 'and form of letter of credit shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town Attorney for approval before a temporary certificate of occupancy may be released for the development plan. 6 i 8. Before a temporary certificate of occupancy is released the applicant shall plat and record a public easement to ensure public access through SDD7 on the proposed sidewalk improvement on The Development Plan. The applicant shall submit the proposed easement agreement to the Town Attorney and Town Council for approval prior to recording. 9. The applicant shall not market Time-Share Estates on the streets, public ways or public places within the Town of Vail. 10. No amplification of sound on the greenspace created by the removal of the two tennis courts shall be allowed for conventions or other special events. 11. Significant landscaping including evergreens, deciduous trees, and shrubs shall be provided on the landscape terraces .over the parking area. If additional structural support must be added to the terraces to support significant landscaping (as described in the previous sentence), the applicant/owner shall be required to strengthen the structure of the terrace to allow for the landscaping. 12. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the west elevation of the parking structure. A mix of deciduous, evergreens, and shrubs shall be provided of a size adequate to screen the structure as much as possible. The applicant is directed to work with Vail Associates on the landscaping buffer. 13. All loading areas shall have additional landscaping and screen fencing. 14. The amendments to Special Development District No. 7 are approved conditional upon Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council giving approval to the underlying zone district request. 15. The ballast on the existing building shall be changed to match the color of the metal roof of the proposed addition. 7 16. The applicant shall repaint the existing Marriott Mark in a manner that is compatible with the new development plan. The applicant shall also modify the existing balcony railings on the Marriott Mark. ,These two improvements to the existing Marriott Mark shall be incorporated into the Design Review Board and building permit submittals for the Development Plan. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy shall not be released for the Development Plan until the repainting and balcony railing work is completed. If the weather prohibits the completion of any of the above improvements, the applicant shall be required to provide a letter of credit to cover 125$ of the construction costs for these improvements. The agreement stipulating how and when the improvements will be completed and the dollar amount and form of letter of credit shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town Attorney for approval before a temporary certificate of occupancy may be released for the development plan. J. Limitation on Firet~laces. Wood burning fireplaces shall not be permitted in any dwelling unit, whether a time-share estate or an employee housing unit nor in any public areas. Any gas fireplaces shall meet the criteria set forth in Town of Vail Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1983 and Ordinance No. 28, Series of 1987, as amended from time to time. K. Recreational Amenities Tax. The recreational amenities tax due for the development within SDD7 shall be assessed at a rate of $1.00 per square foot of floor area and shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. SECTION 3. Sections Declared Invalid., If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 8 a SECTION 4. Conflict with Part II and Part I of SDD No.7., If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of Part II conflicts with any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of Part I of SDD No. 7, the language contained in this Ordinance shall control. SECTION 5. Health, Safety and Welfare. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. SECTION 6. Reveal and Re-Enactment. The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which as accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF 1990 at p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building in Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of , 1990. KENT R. ROSE, MAYOR ATTEST: PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, TOWN CLERK INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ' THIS DAY OF , 1990. KENT R. ROSE, MAYOR ATTEST: PAMELA A. BRANDMEYER, TOWN CLERK 9 TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 4, 1990, REVISED RE: A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott Mark Resort) in order to add 56 timeshare units and 10 employee housing units at 714 West Lionshead Circle, Lot 4, 7, C, D, Block 1, Vail-Lionshead 3rd Filing. Applicant: MK Corporation, Kaiser Marcus, and the Marriott Corporation I. INTRODUCTION A. ~Pronosal Below is a summary of the proposal: " 56 timeshare units each unit not to exceed 1050 sq. ft. for a total of 58,800 sq. ft. of GRFA. One week timeshare intervals are proposed for each unit (50 intervals/unit/year). All timeshare units shall meet Town of Vail Ordinances governing timeshare. 10 employee units at 400 sq. ft. each for a total of 4000 sq. ft. of GRFA. Units are permanently restricted as employee housing. Replace two of the western most tennis courts with landscaping to create an open green space area. ` Landscape improvements around the pool area. Pedestrian path connections for general public use throughout the project. Pocket Park for public seating adjacent to the Lionshead Recreational Path located on Town of Vail property. 127 additional parking spaces which provides 2 spaces per dwelling unit and 1.5 spaces per employee unit per Town of Vail code. 5 spaces are valet. Landscaped terraces are proposed to cover the parking. Regrading and revegetation of hillside adjacent to Town of Vail Recreation Path along Gore Creek. 1 ` No wood-burning fireplaces are proposed for any of the units. Repaint existing Marriott and alteration to design of existing Marriott balconies. This addition would be located on the west end of the property and built primarily over the existing parking structure. As outlined in the SDD section of the zoning code, the following nine criteria are to be used in evaluating the merit of the Special Development District. It is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following standards or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Development Statistics Site Area: 5.08 Acres 221,527 sq. ft. Existing Proposed Development Development Total Accommodation Units 248 0 248 Dwelling Units 53 56 109 Employee Units 0 10 10 GRFA 134,000 62,800 196,800 Meeting Room {sq.ft.) 12,000 0 12,000 Ancillary Retail (sq.ft.) 1,500 0 1,500 Restaurant/Bar {seats) 426 0 426 Parking Spaces 273 127 400 2 1 II. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CRITERIA A. Design comt~atibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment. neicthborhood and adjacent nronerties relative to architectural design, scale. bulk. buildinq height. buffer zones. identity. character, visual integrity and orientation. The Planning and Environmental Commission, staff, and adjacent property owners had concerns about the height and mass of the building. In response to these comments, the applicant has decreased the height from 58 to 48 feet. The mass of the project has been centered in the existing parking structure footprint. As with the original proposal, the mass and height of the proposed expansion have been designed to "step- down" from the existing 7-story hotel to a three to four story element along Gore Creek. In respect to setbacks, on the south side "Gore Creek side", the new building maintains a 20 ft. to 43 ft. setback. On the side of the project adjacent to the Vail Associates parking lot, the expansion of the parking structure would continue an existing 5 foot setback. The actual timeshare building on the southwest corner of the property maintains a minimum 20 foot setback. The north side or west Lionshead Circle side of the project maintains a 35' setback. View studies have been completed from a variety of vantage points. The addition conceals the existing parking structure and eliminates any open parking on the site except for a few spaces on the north elevation. The addition of any new structure will have some degree of impact on views. There are no major negative impacts on views from public spaces. When walking along west Lionshead Circle in front of the project, instead of seeing exposed cars, one will view a three story building. The view analysis indicates that the vantage points from the interstate and the Frontage Road are not affected greatly. The view of the Mountain and ski slopes is substantially maintained. There are some impacts on views from the Antlers (looking towards Red Sandstone Mountain), the residential area along Forest Road (looking toward Potato Patch), and the Vail Spa (looking toward Vail Mountain).. From these vantage points, the proposed building is blocking either a view of the existing parking structure or other commercial or residential development. Obstruction of views of undeveloped mountain sides does occur in some areas. 3 By terracing the building down to Gore Creek to relate to the lower density development on Forest Road and also the public recreational path and stream corridor, the applicant has responded to view concerns raised by the public at previous reviews by lowering the height of the building by 10 feet. The architecture of the proposed addition does not mimic the existing hotel. Instead, the applicant proposes to relate the two buildings by the use of complimentary colors. The applicant has agreed to repaint the entire existing Marriott project in a manner which will compliment the proposed expansion. B. Uses, activity and density which Qrovide a compatible,, efficient and workable relationship with surroundinq uses and activity. Density The residential uses proposed for this facility are consistent and compatible with surrounding development. Located in the Lionshead area, overnight lodging accommodations are appropriate for this site. One of Vail's major mixed use activity centers, Lionshead is centrally located and well served by the Towns transit system. At the present time, the site is developed to approximately 34.8 units per acre. The development proposed with this amendment would increase the site density to approximately 47.8 units per acre (this includes the 10 employee units). This level of .development exceeds that permitted by the Town's highest density residential district (PA or HDMF, 25 dwelling units per acre). However, 47.8 units per acre is not unprecedented. The Lionsquare Lodge is developed at 55 units per acre, the Antlers is at 60.5 units per acre, the Doubletree is 51 units per acre, and Vantage Point is at 71 units per acre. The Vail Spa directly to the north is at 17.2 units per acre and the Enzian is at 31.4 units per acre. However, looking only, at units/acre misses other planning issues. The relationship of the building to the site and surrounding neighborhood is relevant. Staff believes this project relates positively to the specific site and surrounding neighbors. The density proposed for this site is much greater than the low density development on the south side of Gore Creek. Gore Creek provides a natural buffer between the low density residential development along Forest Road and the entire Lionshead area. This open space provides an adequate buffer between these two residential areas. Gore Creek also serves as a natural 4 1 barrier defining the physical limits of the Lionshead core area. Please see the attached chart indicating the existing development on adjacent properties attached to the zoning memo. Timeshare The proposed timeshare use is acceptable to staff. Timeshare would only be allowed in the new west building through this amendment. Any additional timeshare would require that the applicant amend the SDD. This use is encouraged by the Land Use Plan. The applicant has agreed to comply with all conditions of Town of Vail Ordinances governing timeshare. Timeshare projects generally .retain a higher year round occupancy than any other tourist accommodation use and this use fits well within Vail's policies to level seasonalities of guest visits. Emnlovee Housinq Originally, the staff requested seven employee housing units. The applicant is proposing 10 units or 17.8$. .The Housing Task Force is discussing a possibility of a 20~ or greater housing requirement for SDDs. The Marriott proposal has been evolving at the same time that the Housing Task Force has been refining its policy recommendations. The staff opinion is that the applicant is providing 10 high quality employee units, .permanently restricted. We believe the applicant has taken the staff's original request of seven units (March 1990) and increased the amount to 10 units which is appropriate for this SDD. The 56 timeshare units will generate an employee demand of 5 to 7 additional employees. This is due in part to the fact that the existing Marriott will provide most of the services for the timeshare project. The employee demand generated by the expansion is met by the 10 units. C. Comtiliance with narking and loading requirements as, outlined in Chanter 18.52. Assuming 1.5 parking space for each of the l0~employee units, and two parking spaces for each of the 56 timeshare units (as per zoning requirements), the new parking requirement for the proposed addition is 127 spaces. The expansion of the existing structure will satisfy this requirement. To the best of staff's knowledge, the parking required through previous approvals has all been constructed (273 spaces). 5 As required by existing SDD No. 7 there are to be 273 parking spaces on the Marriott property. As with any property, the management and control of parking spaces is critical to their efficient use. At the present time, the westerly parking structure provides a very inviting environment for illegal parking. Locating a building over the structure should provide greater. control and increase efficiency in how these spaces are utilized. Two loading areas presently exist. Staff will also require that the screening of loading areas b.e addressed by the applicant at DRB. In particular, the loading area on West Lionshead Circle to the east of the main hotel's entry must be landscaped and fenced. D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan. Town policies and Urban Design Plans. The Vail Land Use Plan is the most relevant document to be used in evaluating this development proposal. The project is consistent with a number of goals outlined in this document: 1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded whenever possible. 1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing developed areas (infill areas). 2.1 The community should emphasize its role as a destination resort while accommodating the visitors. 4.2 Increased density in the Core areas is acceptable so long as the existing character is preserved through implementation of the Urban Design Guide Plan and the Vail Village Master Plan. 5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and is appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. 6 5.2 Quality timeshare units should be acc~~.«odated to keep occupancy rates up. 5.4 Residential growth should keep pace with the market place demands for a full range of housing types. 5.5 The existing employee housing base should be preserved and upgraded. Additional employee housing needs should be accommodated at various sites throughout the community. These goal statements provide the fundamental framework to be used in detenaining whether or not additional density is appropriate on this site. As reflected in the above goals, this proposal is very consistent with the direction provided in the Land Use Plan. *Please note that the Lionshead Urban Design Guide Plan does not apply to this property. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. This property is not affected by any natural and/or geologic hazards that have been identified within the Town of Vail. F. Site plan. building design and location and oven space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The site planning for the addition has changed in that a major portion of the addition has been centered over the existing parking structure. The location of the - mass and bulk of the building in this area has allowed the designer to reduce the height by ten feet. It has also helped to reduce the building mass along~Gore Creek. A portion of the new development is proposed on what is now undeveloped open space directly south of the existing parking structure. Several aspens will be removed to allow for the building. However, this open space is generally not accessible and not an aesthetically pleasing area. 7 r A major element of the proposal's landscape plan is the elimination of two tennis courts. Converting this area to functional green space will more than off-set the loss of open space south of the parking structure. A major concern of the staff is the physical relationship of the building addition to Gore Creek and the recreational trail. Originally proposed at 5 stories and within 5 feet of the property line, the addition would have seriously impacted the enjoyment of this trail. The building is now 20-40 feet from the rear property line. The building is approximately 50- 60 feet from the recreational trail. The south facade is three and four stories. The location and mass of the building now provides for a comfortable relationship with the recreational trail. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic, circulation. Improvements to the pedestrian circulation system include a path connecting to the Gore Creek bike path, a walkway through the proposed development connecting the West Day Lot with other parts of Lionshead, and the development of a sidewalk along West Lionshead Circle connecting to an existing sidewalk on the South Frontage Road. This improvement is located off the applicants property. These improvements are designed to serve not only the proposed development, but also to improve pedestrian circulation throughout this area of Lionshead. Staff would suggest that the applicant include a pedestrian connection between the west day lot and the lower level of the parking structure to allow for easier pedestrian access. We would also ask that the owner provide a public pedestrian easement through the property. Internal vehicular circulation will also be improved by redesigning the existing parking structure. Currently each level is accessed individually, resulting in difficult circulation patterns. The proposed modifications to the structure will introduce internal circulation between the three levels of the structure. An assessment of the potential traffic impacts of this development has been included as a part of the environmental impact report. A March 9 addendum to this report indicates that a westbound left turn lane off of the S. Frontage Road onto West Lionshead Circle is needed today based on existing traffic volume. Currently, 35 vehicles make this left turn during the 8 p.m. peak hour. This development would increase this situation by 20$, to 42 vehicles during the p.m. peak hour. Based on the State of Colorado Access Code, a left turn lane is warranted with more than 30 turns per hour. Given the 20$ increase in this left turn activity, there is no question that this improvement must be completed before the proposed expansion receives a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. However, the Marriott addition is not the sole contributor to the need for the left turn lane. Town buses, the West Day Lot and a number of other properties are creating the need for this lane. Because the Marriott is the "last guy in the door" does not justify requiring them to fund and construct 100$ of this improvement. The Marriott is responsible for, and is willing to contribute to, their fair share of the expense in constructing this improvement. There are a number of alternatives for how this improvement can be implemented. The main issue with each of these alternatives is with regard to the timing of the improvement. The Town will be completing a comprehensive transportation plan for the Frontage Road this fall. It is very likely that this improvement will be identified by this plan. However, the Town is in no position to commit to funding or a specific schedule would assure this improvement is in place • prior to completion of the Marriott facility. This essentially puts the burden on the applicant to develop some mechanism for assuring that the turn lane is completed when the addition is finished. The simplest way to accomplish this is for the Marriott to fund 100$ of this improvement. However, this is not an equitable solution. Other alternatives involving the participation of the Marriott, surrounding property owners, and the Town are possible, and should be explored to arrive at an equitable solution. H. Functional and aesthetic landscat~ina and otien~snace in order.to optimize and tireserve natural features. recreation, views and functions. There are a number of significant improvements proposed to landscaping and open space throughout this site. Foremost among these is the conversion of two tennis courts to green space areas, a pocket park/pull off area to be developed along the Gore Creek trail, landscape improvements to the berm around the proposed addition, and landscape improvements along Lionshead 9 Circle throughout the length of the property. These changes will provide not only functional open space, but also aesthetic improvements to the site. The pocket park is a positive addition. Staff would like to see a picnic area added to the pocket park and more landscaping. The developer has also agreed with the staff's requirement that the stream bank be regraded and revegetated this summer. The drainage walls and pipes will also be cleaned and integrated into the slope. In addition, more landscaping is required along the west elevation of the structure. A mix of aspens, shrubs and evergreens is appropriate. Staff acknowledges that the space for planting is only 5 feet. However, more landscaping and a variety of materials are necessary. I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a, workable. functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development. district. As proposed, the addition and all related site improvements are to be completed in one construction phase. V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Environmental Impact Report prepared by Peter Jamar Associates (Revised May 10, 1990) summarizes any impacts and proposed mitigation on p. 32 of the report. The primary impact areas relate to views, traffic, and the question of additional density. These issues are reviewed by staff in Sections IIA-Views, IIC & G-Traffic, and IIB-Density. All mitigation measures proposed in the EIR shall be incorporated into the SDD. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In evaluating this proposal, one must first consider the fundamental question of whether or not additional development should be considered in Lionshead on this site. Based on the goals of the Vail Land Use Plan, it is appropriate to consider a request of this nature. A number of goal statements support the concept of timeshare units and infill development in the Core areas. The task at hand then, is to evaluate whether the design of this project is sensitive to all applicable criteria outlined in the SDD section of the zoning code. 10 A review of the SDD criteria indicates that this project is consistent with the purpose and intent of this zone district. A number of issues have been raised by the PEC and staff during the review of this project. In each case these concerns have been addressed by the applicant in a manner that is consistent with the Design Criteria. Parking, circulation,. height and massing, view impacts, employee housing, and landscaping/open space have all been addressed by this development plan. Staff must emphasis the uniqueness of the Marriott Mark situation. There are very few sites within the Town of Vail that have the capability to add this type of density. Staff believes that there are unique characteristics related to this site that make it possible to add a proposal of this scale. Unique factors include: 1. The existing parking structure is in a location that would actually be improved in appearance with this expansion. The site is very well suited for infill development. 2. The Lionshead area (excluding the Forest Road neighborhood) has similar lodging uses, mass, bulk and units per acre which are compatible with this type of addition. 3. The applicant has maintained a 48 foot height which does not exceed the limits of the Town's highest density zone district (HDMF or Public Accommodation zoning). 4. The proposed use is in keeping with the Land Use plan goals calling for additional timeshare units and other Land Use policies as listed in Section IID of the memo. 5. The Environmental Impact Report and staff review have not identified any major negative impacts with the project. Any impacts that have been determined by the environmental impact report have been mitigated in a reasonable fashion. 6. The project meets parking, setbacks (except on the east side by the parking structure), site coverage and landscaping requirements. In fact, the minimum requirements for site coverage and landscaping are substantially exceeded by the project. 7. The site has good vehicular and pedestrian access. Vehicular traffic will use the Frontage Road. It is not necessary to access the site through a low density residential neighborhood. it 8. The site is located near all of the services and a ~ primary ski base area, Lionshead. It is very appropriate to allow for infill development in an area that already has a wide variety of guest services. Staff feels it is critical to identify the uniqueness of this special Development District to ensure that density increases are not deemed automatically acceptable by using the Special Development district process. It is also important to identify the "public benefit" which results from this project. Below is a list of the benefits which are derived from this proposal: ` The substantial upgrade of landscaping on the Marriott property as well as area adjacent to the recreational path along Gore Creek owned by the town of Vail. ` The provision of public walkways along west Lionshead Circle through the center of the Marriott site from the West Day Lot. The entire repainting of the existing Marriott Project to compliment the proposed expansion. Enclosure of the existing surface parking and the addition of landscaped and open area above the parking. This is achieved by the landscaped terraces over the parking area as well as the elimination of two tennis courts. The provision of 10 employee housing units which have been fully counted in the density and GRFA for the project. The provision of additional high quality timeshare units which diversify the existing unit type and mix and provide Vail with additional destination guests year-round per the Land Use plan goal 5.2. Staff recommends approval of this proposed amendment with the stipulation that the developers/owner meet the following conditions: 1. Deed restrictions limiting the use of the ten employee units to long term employee rentals in perpetuity shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. The units shall meet the conditions for employee housing outlined in Section 18.13.080 B10 a-d of the Zoning Code except that the units are restricted permanently. 12 2. A detailed drainage plan and other design issues relevant to public works concerns shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Pollution control devises shall be incorporated into the parking garage per the EIR. The creek shall be protected from any construction impacts by the use of an erosion control plan. 3. Working in coordination with the Town staff, the applicant shall fund and conduct a comprehensive traffic study of the West Lionshead Circle area suitable for determining the Marriott Mark's contribution to the cost of constructing any necessary turn lanes on the S. Frontage Road to West Lionshead Circle. Preliminary design and cost estimates for the turn lanes shall be provided. At a minimum, the applicant shall be responsible for contributing this agreed upon amount toward the cost of this improvement. 4. A preliminary design and funding strategy for constructing any turn lanes shall be established prior to the issuance of any building permit, and the turn lanes shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The funding and construction plan must be approved by the Town of Vail engineer, C~,~,.«unity Development Department, Town Council, and Colorado Division of Highways before the building permit is released for the expansion. The applicant shall be required to submit a CDOH access permit application on behalf of the Town for the West Lionshead Circle/South Frontage Road improvement. A signed CDOH permit must be obtained by the applicant before a building permit is released. 5. All aspects related to the timesharing of this facility shall comply with all applicable town ordinances that regulate timeshare activity. Timeshare is only approved for the proposed 56 unit building. The 10 employee units shall not be allowed to convert to timeshare. 6. Any landscaping proposed on Town of Vail land shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town of Vail landscape architect and engineer for approval before the proposal is submitted to the Design Review Board. All landscaping proposed on Town of Vail land shall be maintained by the applicant. 13' 7. The applicant shall agree to regrade, revegetate, and r repair the drainage on the bank adjacent to the bike path along the southern property line of the Marriott Mark by August 1, 1990. A letter of credit shall be _ submitted to the Town of Vail before second reading of the SDD ordinance. The landscape and drainage work shall be submitted to the Town Engineer and Landscape Architect for approval before the proposal is presented to Design Review Board. 8. A temporary certificate of occupancy shall not be released for the expansion until all site improvements have been completed such as sidewalks, landscaping, drainage etc. If the weather prohibits the completion of the site improvements, the applicant shall be required to provide a letter of credit to cover 125 of the construction costs for these improvements. The construction estimate shall be reviewed by the Town Engineer and Landscape Architect. The agreement stipulating how the site improvements will be completed and letter of credit shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town Attorney for approval before a temporary certificate of occupancy may be released. 9. Before a temporary certificate of occupancy is released, the applicant shall plat a public easement to insure public access through the site on the proposed sidewalk improvements. The applicant shall submit the easement agreement to the Town Attorney and Town Council for approval before recording the easement. 10. In addition, the staff recommends that the DEsign Review Board address the following design issues if the project proceeds to DRB: ' Additional landscaping shall be addressed along the west elevation of the parking structure. A mix of deciduous, evergreens, and shrubs should be provided of a size adequate to screen the structure as much as possible. Landscaping beyond sod should be provided on the landscape terraces over the parking if possible structurally. ' All loading areas should have additional landscaping and screen fencing if necessary. The loading area to the south of the Enzian;or L'Ostello should be fenced. ' Pedestrian access should be provided from the West Day Lot through the lowest level of the~~parking structure. 14 The entry stair on the north elevation should be _ decreased in width to allow more landscaping. The north elevation adjacent to the parking structure stair should have more windows. Landscaping should be planted along the stairway and building. 15 REVISED 7/13/90 TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 19, 1990 RE: Summary of Planning Commission action on a request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 7 (The Marriott Mark Resort) in order to add 56 timeshare units and 10 employee housing units at 714 West Lionshead Circle, Lot 4, 7, C, D, Block 1, Vail- Lionshead 3rd Filing. On June 11, 1990, the Planning and Environmental Commission recommended approval of this request with conditions. The motion was made by Kathy Warren and seconded by Jim Shearer. The vote was 4-1 for approval of the motion. Connie Knight voted against the motion, Chuck Crist abstained and Ludwig Kurz was absent. Connie Knight voted against the request due to her concern about the overages in GRFA (70,077 sq. ft. over HDMF allowed GRFA), units per acre (22 units above allowable under HDMF), and the number of units (115 units over HDMF allowable). Below is a list of the Planning and Environmental Commission's changes to the staff conditions for the SDD. The PEC's changes have been indicated in bold type. 1. Deed restrictions limiting the use of the ten employee units to long term employee rentals in perpetuity shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. The units shall meet the conditions for employee housing outlined in Section 18.13.080 B10 a-d of the Zoning Code except that the units are restricted permanently. 2. A detailed drainage plan and other design issues relevant to public works concerns shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Pollution control devises shall be incorporated into the parking garage per the EIR. The creek shall be protected from any construction impacts by the use of an erosion control plan. 3. Working in coordination with the Town staff, the applicant shall fund and conduct a comprehensive traffic study of the West Lionshead Circle area suitable for determining the Marriott Mark's contribution to the cost of constructing any necessary turn lanes on the S. Frontage Road to West Lionshead Circle. Preliminary design and cost estimates for the turn lanes shall be provided. At a minimum, the applicant shall be responsible for contributing this agreed upon amount toward the cost of this improvement. 1 4. A preliminary design and funding strategy for constructing any turn lanes shall be established prior to the issuance of any building permit, .and the turn lanes shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of occupancy unless deferred by the Community Development Department and Public Works. The funding and construction ' plan must be approved by the Town of Vail engineer, Community Development Department, Town Council, and Colorado Division of Highways before the building permit is released for the expansion. The applicant shall be required to submit a CDOH access permit application on behalf of the Town for the West Lionshead Circle/South Frontage Road improvement. A signed CDOH permit must be obtained by the applicant before a building permit is released unless deferred by the Community Development Department and Public Works. 5. All aspects related to the timesharing of this facility shall comply with all applicable town ordinances that regulate timeshare activity. Timeshare is only approved for the proposed 56 unit building. The 10 employee units shall not be allowed to convert to timeshare. 6. (Any landscaping] Detailed landscaping similar to the Westin Hotel landscaping along the recreation path proposed on Town of Vail land shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town of Vail landscape architect and engineer for approval before the proposal is submitted to the Design Review Board. All . landscaping proposed on Town of Vail land shall be maintained by the applicant. 7. The applicant shall agree to regrade, revegetate, and repair the drainage on the bank adjacent to the bike path along the southern property line of the Marriott Mark by August 1, 1990. A letter of credit shall be submitted to the Town of Vail before second reading of the SDD ordinance. The landscape and drainage work shall be submitted to the Town Engineer and Landscape Architect for approval before the proposal is presented to Design Review Board. 8. A temporary certificate of occupancy shall not be released for the expansion until all site improvements have been completed such as sidewalks, landscaping, drainage etc. If the weather prohibits the completion of the site improvements, the applicant shall be required to provide a letter of credit to cover 125$ of the construction costs for these improvements. The construction estimate shall be -reviewed by the Town Engineer and Landscape Architect. The agreement stipulating how the site improvements will be completed and letter of credit shall be submitted by the applicant to the Town Attorney for approval before a temporary certificate of occupancy may be released. 9. Before a temporary certificate of occupancy is released, the applicant shall plat a public easement to insure public access through the site on the proposed sidewalk improvements. The applicant shall submit the easement l0. Marketing language for the 'sale of the timeshare units shall be submitted by the Town Attorney by the applicant for ' approval. This wording governing the marketing of the - Py timesharing shall be added to the SDD Ordinance. ' 11. No amplification of sound on the greenspace created by the removal of the two tennis courts shall be allowed for conventions or other special events. The following items were staff recommendations to the Design Review Board if the project proceeded to that review level. The Planning Commission changed these recommendations to conditions of approval. iZ. Significant landscaping including evergreens, deciduous .trees, and shrubs shall be provided on the landscape terraces over the parking area. If additional structural support must be added to the terraces to support significant landscaping (as described in the previous sentence), the applicant/owner shall be required to strengthen the structure of the terrace to allow for the landscaping. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the west elevation of .the parking structure. A mix of deciduous, evergreens, and shrubs shall be .provided of a size adequate to screen the structure as much as possible. The applicant is directed to work with Vail Associates on the landscaping buffer. 14. All loading areas shall have additional landscaping and screen fencing. 15. The amendments to Special Development District No. 7 are approved conditional upon Planning and Environmental Commission and Town Council giving approval to the underlying zone district request. 16. The ballast on the existing building shall be changed to match the color of the metal roof of the proposed addition. In addition, the staff and PEC recommend that the Design Review Board address the following design issues if the project proceeds to DRB: " Pedestrian access should be provided from the West Day Lot through the lowest level of the parking structure. " The entry stair on the north elevation should be decreased in width to allow more landscaping. ` The north elevation adjacent to the parking structure stair should have more windows. Landscaping should be planted along the stairway and building. These conditions of approval have been incorporated into the Special Development District Ordinance. The recommendations to the Design Review Board will be passed onto the DRB by the Community Development Department. 3 - PETER )A1v1AR ASSOCIATES, INC PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS. RESEARCH }~Q$Ah e~u~ TO: 1CtISTAN PRITZ FROM: r~,~r~rt JAMAR DATE: JULY 10, 1990 RE: MARRIOTT MARK RESORT EXPANSION AND RENOVATION -SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #7 As a result of the Town Council's review of the project and in response to several suggestions made by members of the Town Council we would like to propose the following four revisions, commitments, and clarifications. 1. GRFA. The previous GRFA total proposed was 67,200 square feet, excluding the 4,000 square feet for the ten employee units. After further study and analysis of the floor plans we propose to reduce this total to 58,800 square feet. 2. ARCHITE~.~uxAL FEATURES OF EXISTING HOTEL EXTERIOR. It has been suggested that, in addition to our previous commitment to repaint the exterior of the existing hotel, we study possible alteration of the balconies in order to improve the building's appearance. We feel that this is an excellent suggestion and we are investigatingvarious design solutions. We will have a specific design to propose in the next few days. 3'. TIMESHARING. Due to several questions regarding the timeshare nature of the expansion we have prepared an informational memorandum addressing specific questions. This memorandum is attached and can be included in this week's Town Council packet. - t Suite 308, varl National Bank f3uridrng ~ 108 South Frontage Road west vart, Colorado 81657 . (303) 476-7154 ` i 4 • Memorandum to Kristan Pritz July 9, 1990 Page 2 ' 4 • j~FT ~~,xN j,~ANE. Asa point of clarification, we fully understand that if .for some reason an overall funding strategy for Frontage Road improvements is not established prior to issuance of our C.O., we may be responsible for 100$ of the cost of the left turn Lane off of Frontage Road to West Lionshead Circle with aright of reimbursement for: costs exceeding "our fair share" at some future date should an overall funding mechanism be put into place, - Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these five items or any other aspect of the project. h ~ T lT,r-~ T i~ y~ V Kai J ^ 7 ~ Vail To::n C~~wncil t• :J.~; John F. Sweeney Vice President,/'~ velopnent SUR7ECT Marriott Mark Resort Dr~lE July 5, 1990 FILE:P7P50/OWPdE.I.1EM As a follow-up to our recent hearing T wanted to provide additional information to the Council concerning the timesharing industry in general and Marriott timesharing specifically. our proceeding on June 19 covered many issues and a relatively new concept for most of the Council members. Accordingly, the amount of lime we had did not afford an opportunity for me to fully explain or document the programs and facts that we feel makes our timesharing operations both unique and superlative. I would therefore like to provide some salient facts about our organization and industry to more fully inform you about things we feel makes =~~-e Mark Marriott ti~^.esharing project a good fit for Vail. :;._y is Marriott in the timesharing business? This is generally the first question we are asked in municipal presentations. The answer is quite simple. Timesharing under the leadership of Marriott and other major companies such as Hilton, ITT-Sheraton, Disney and Radisson has shed most of its previous poor image. It has emerged to consumers and developers in recent years as a respectable business opportunity especially for hotel and resort operators. It has many positive advantages that have captured the attention of large development organizations, as well as hoteliers: _ o It is a logical extension of the hospitality business. o The skills and services needed to provide customer satisfaction are patently similar to hotels. o Timesharing sells seasons and periods through the entire year bolstering periods of low occupancy. o The timesharing customer closely matches the resort hotel guest profile..upscale, and vacation minded. o The timeshare experience is repetitive yet cyclic... it creates brand loyalty. o The exchange and rental functions bring tourists to the resort area that might not come otherwise. ~ r •--1 C 1 o ~,`.?e iriaus pry has reached world-wide proportions t•,~ith 2600 resorts throughout the world in over 40 countries. Tlie~e are presently over 1, 600 timesharing resorts in the United States alone. o There are presently over 2.5 million American families that own timesharing interests. This represents a significant portion of the upscale consumer market, and stands as testimony to the acceptance of the product. o The industry has emerged from uncertainty and largely overcome the marketing abuses that tainted early years. o The industry is now controlled with meaningful State and Federal legislation. Forty seven States in the U.S. have specific timeshare statutes. o With numerous successful SEC offerings and wide-spread -receivables f ina*~cing through major f i7ancial institutions, the industry has been accepted by the investment community as a viable financial vehicle. o Press in recent years has acknowledged by the tenor of recent articles that timesharing is a second home alternative for the 1990's and beyond. o The extensive advertising used in promoting the timesharing product creates impact that benefits the market area at all economic levels. o It presents a business opportunity for revenue and profits at acceptable risk levels All of the above reasons bear on the Marriott decision to enter the ' timesharing field. They are further re-enforced by Marriott's leadership position in hotel and resort management. We clearly are in the dominant role in the timesharing industry today, by virtue of our entry into the business five years ago. Some specific facts that enhance Marriott's participation in the timesharing industry are: o Our hotels that operate with ancillary timesharing facilities have found that the Marriott timesharing owner is a congruent fit with the hotel guest profile. - - t o We have no~•; seen th~.t the timeshare o~aner does in fact augment our food and beverage business as well as positively influence occupancy. o We have established viable rental and resale progrars in our timesharing strategic business plan. o We are able to take advantage of the positioning of Marriott operations in preferred market areas. o The use of hotel facilities and tie-ins such as front desk services gives us a competitive edge and sets the consumer's perceived values at higher levels. o Our highly successful Honored Guest Award Program dovetails with both hotel and timesharing operations. Looking to the record of what we have accomplished, I have a listed } '_oh~ r~:sorts that we have sold out, have in sales, or ha?e in various stages of active development at this time: Resort/Location Comments Monarch at Seapines 122 two BR villas.1250 sf. Hilton Head, SC Sold out in 1987. Winner of numerous design awards. One award presented at a White House ceremony. Sabal Palms 80 two BR Villas (1360 sf) Orlando, FL Golf course location adjacent to Marriott World Center Resort. Sold out in 1987 . Royal Palms 123 villas (1250 sf) All Orlando, FL 2BR/2B~units. Golf course location adjacent to Marriott World Ctr Resort. Sold out Spring 1990 Heritage Club 30 Two BR villas. Sold out Hilton Head, SC in nine months in 1987. 1430 sf units Harbour Club 40 villas-two BR. Currently Hilton Head, SC in sales with sell out in 1990. 1625 sf units. 1 . A r~ ~ 7 C: J. l j LJ~e~'t Sprints Vi11Gs 239 two BR villas. 1650 sf. Pala ~cser~~, CA Sales started in 1989. Well «heGd of projections. A.11 • units on golf course ne~~t to 850 coon hotel. Streamside at Vail 39 two BR villas. 1250 sf. S4est Vail, CO Development in progress. Existing 111 units in place Paradise Beach Club 135 two BR villas. 1264 sf. Pdassau, Bahamas Beachfront location. Sales start in 1990. Cypress Harbour 500 two BR villas. 1345 sf. Orlando, FL Under development. Sales in progress. Sunset Pointe 111 two BR villas. 1165 sf. Hilton Head, SC Currently in sales. Palmeras Villas 200 two BR villas. 1275 sf. Puerta Vallarta, MX Currently in final stages of planning. Adjacent to new Marriott resort hotel. Hilton Head Inn Planning in progress for Hilton Head, SC 200 beachfront units. All two bedroom units. 1250 sf. The above listed resorts do not include others in preliminary stages of development and negotiations in Europe, Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean, Arizona California, Virginia and South Carolina that will not come on stream until 1991 in our system. The properties listed reflect timesharing sales in excess of $175,000,000 million dollars since Marriott entered timesharing in 1984. This represents 400 units completed and the sale of 20,000 interval weeks. The resorts we have under development and in planning stages shown on the above list total an additional 1,100+ units with a retail sales potential of over $400,000,000. . L.:G.:~-:~.~a.l _ r T.i-- r To provic:e a window on the demoe~raphi.cs and satisfaction levels of our I~~~arri ott owners base, now nurbering 40, 000 families, I have provided some excerpts foria an indep~r~dent sL!rvey conducted in 1989 with the following data resulting: o Satisfaction level: 89% o Responses: 62% owners responding from Orlando resorts 38% owners responding from Hilton Head resorts o Most important reasons for purchasing Marriott timesharing: Reputation of Marriott 46% Marriott Exchange System 390 Liked the Unit/resort 22% Guaranteed accomodations 32% Save money on vacations 22% o arriott timesharing owner demographics: Married couples 91% One or more children at home 48% Age 35-54 63% Age 55+ 30% College Degree or higher 79% College - non degree 86% Graduate School degree 40% Professional,manager or self employed 75~ Retired g~ Sales/technical trades 10% Government workers 4% o Income Data: Under $40,000 6$ $40-50,000 7$ $50-60,000 13$ $60-75,000 18$ $75-100,000 23$ $100-125,000 13$ $125,000 or higher 20% _ : : ~ 1 G;iC;laI"iC~.B u~t,1Sr4Ci.1Gi1 a;, iGrriott l:O:CtE Y'E:.~O?"%: Very satisfactory S"~% - Satisfactory 150 U:isatisfactory 1 % o Level of interest in resort locations for Marriott timesharing resorts: Hawaii - 87% Caribbean - 86% San Francisco - 76% Hilton Head - 76% Orlando - 69% Palm Springs - 68% Colorado - 64% California Bch - 63% Cancun - 62% Cape Cod - 61% LA/San Diego - 60% Puerta Vallarta - 59% New Orleans - 58% Washington, D.C - 50% Miami - 23 % * Selection of western areas deemed at high level considering that all owners sampled were from east coast. Palm Desert owners not included in survey since not officially on MORI owner roles in 1989. For your review I have attached articles from major newspapers and national magazines regarding timesharing and its general posture in the eyes of the press. These articles represent independent positions. I have however also attached some recent trade publication articles on Marriott which reflects some of the resort activity mentioned in this memo. You will also note that I have attached two letters from key business people on Hilton Head Island. These letters reflect the sentiments about Marriott Ownership Resorts in the local community. these individuals could be contacted for references if deemed necessary or appropriate by Council members. j•re had _~reviously rzca:n~endecl that.the Toi~rr. of Vail PEC cor_tact `r?'. R•_'_:~~on Diaz, Chairman of tl.e Co~~~unity Planning Department foz .Pali, Desert California. bir. Diaz was cc:~tacted in the PEC process, I believe. 1 hope that the documentation on the preceding pages has helped you to evaluate our project's appropriateness to Vail's exceptional environn:ant. We selected Vail for our hotel and for our timesharing resort because it meets our exacting standards, just 4s we are dedicated to meet yours. Timeshare Lx;:lsi:y~ :.ruwti? i~7~-l~~ic; 2400 (ln Millions O, Doll~lrs) . 2200 , ~z.~l Biliio:! S2 Billion 2000 El.a 4 1800 tl- pion j } i E:.G 1 1600 Ilillion I ' SI.S Billion I 1 1400 E1.3 E1.3 I Billion Ilillion ~ I 1 1200 ~ El.o ' EI Billion 1000 Bacon ~ i 800 E650 Million I 600 ' 400 SJ00 Minion f 200 slso ~ . Million ` S75 S50 Million Million ~ j .1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 19E4 1985• 19c6 V n . r......... t.._ /t~/~1~ r T t . i~•~i _ ~ ~ ~ 30 l ~ ~ ~s ~ so • is L J sa ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ c O O ~ u 0 C ~ • O cD o0 ~ ~ ~ ` p v ~ Y ~ ~ C ~ Q < c1 ® Cliffs Club ~ Neighboring ®Condo (Kauai) Owners Island Visitors Visitors Timeshare Visitor Party Expenditures Compared To Other Visitor Party Fapenditures, _ Accommodations Excluded* $ Per Party Per Day Ratio, Average Visitor Timeshare Visitors To: Yeaz of Timeshare All Condo All Condo Data Owners Visitors Accommodations Visitors Accommodations Hav~ati 1979 115.83 76.63 98.79 1.51 1.17 Western 1979 68.84 5323 N/A 129 N/A US Sanibel/ 1979 7730 5822 N/A 1.33 N/A Ft. Myers, Florida South 1984 90.57 N/A N/A 1.0 N/A Carolina Florida 1984 148.00 111.00 N/A 1.0 N/A • 'Timeshare maintenance and use fees excluded Cliffs Club in Kauai, Hawaii was selected as a comparison due to iu many simi]arities to Marriott Ownership Resort's Palm Desert project. Bar graph and table are from "The Economic Effects Of " TimeSharin I Timeshare Development -June 1987 sponsorrd by the International Foundation For g (Fn, Washington, DC and conducted by Ragatz Associates and Dean Runyan Associates, Eugene, Oregon. - . ~ F.. ~ i : ~ `i G' i i f'~ 1 ~ f 1 .i ~ , _ _ - -.t -.M• ,•lw..yr, ;,5- :4~y'~~•~, ~o..3w°.::::r. :,au ~~,~a~~~aa: ~"~.~k~•.:::i`~i'r -'~~:SLY.`-. t~'. Fes'-w.~yi h?!:,;.;.rt~.,; ;t: ~a. . t . Y . :3$, Ht ;ter i ;:2,~~'~'cgF~`-=.`~4-:'- :7i . r`:~yi~c~.ir:.....:~~iiSiroL' ''YY.~v.:i::.ma=~,~^~.~..;::z.1c::, y_e'.. .-~r}~-. "i 1•.?ti !-a:s~iii~idx~L3iLi~+" .+t ~ better accommodations. The Quality nearly 300,000 individual member fami• lilzeshare. Rating System was developed by Inter- lies, who have acquired proprietary ..(-111 ~duS l.I val International in conjunction with interests in timeshare or vacation owner- '~J Cornell University School of Hotel ship resorts, and 600 member resorts in ! ,J Administration and is thought of as the 45 countries around the world. toughest in the vacation industry. One reputable Califomia timeshare Comes o~Age This computerized worldwide company is Glen Ivy, a privately held = i exchange network is the most important corporation based in Corona, Califomia. 7 ne timeshare industry, Which is dimension of the VJorldex Corporation, The parent company, Glen Ivy Financial based on the idea of making resort prop- giving resort developers the ability to Group, has been considered by lnc. Ma;- ercies accessible to more people, has offer ocher resorts to timeshare owners. mine as one of the fastest growing pri- gro~•n into a S2 billion worldwide busi- Today, Interval International boasts. continued on~page 134 ness over the past nvo decades. One tea- j ~x ' ' Wig;` son for this success has been the estab- + -y'w'~-~r"'~-~,~'-.~°s ' ~ x~ ~ r- ••w: iv- lishment of laws and guidelines within r w,~~~~,,;;e.~~;,,,~~~~ • the timeshare industry chat guarantee _ ,~:z.-•- . terrain standards to the bu in ublic. ~ ~ ` ~ M - i Several key institutions. have - '~s~.~,~^y~:~=:= emerged within the timeshare industry, ~ ~ - - working to legitimize and stabilize the business. One such institution is the A _ American Resort and Residential Devel- ~ ~ - I~`aTfiafa. opers Association (ARRDA), the trade ~ _ ~ . - ••ti i organi~cion for the industry. Their job is ""~`~"~`"'':'r~~~;;•? r to make sure the members interests, as ~ _ , ~ -s•-' " - ~ ~ ,h 7.!ps~, well as the interests of the consumer, are - - ^ ~ r • ' • ~ being met. They are also responsible for ~ ' " - ' educating the industry aboucnew legisla- L,,,~,• tion and developments. r i Another stabilizing force in the l industry is Inter~~al Intemational (II), a division of the Worldex Corporation. Interval Intemational was founded by Mario Rodrique., whose goal was to offer ' the world to timeshare participants. This idea created the exchange programs, b allowing timeshare owners the abilit~~ to _ wade time with others throughout the world. To do this effectively, II has set f high standards for resorts v~anting to be a pan of the exchange network, assuring ~ ~ 4 members that they're getting the same or Dann Point H...L„~, location of the new S-Scar Riviera Beath and Spa resort. } iss AUGUST 1988 ~ . - - ~ _ _ ; r.... r _ . . - ~ }o ~ F . "..,:inu~d 4o:n j:='~s^ I36 _ _ scar. 157: +t~l}' held CUtn~.;in1:5 l)Ver the rapt rletC re+:1CI (1i~%:;lll~ln2l $Cr\'ICtS iel time- recently' CO1i1~ alt)11~' IS Ct!iCar1C)', a C:%!a- ti~ree pears. Tl;ey are tit: first vacatirn share rrnjc:cts. 1\9an;.gin; mctr_ than 30 rang that eomrliments Inten•;:i feet: :~~~r:er.:hir devel:a; e; ttt r,tie•suhstantial resort rro}-,ernes, rerresentin}; 62,00 Inrematictnal by r.~erin~ timesh:ue o~~~n- ~;::;~s through the sale Uf securities, timeshare irrerv,als, \'P.! is a lcad~r in erJ the ability ttt male last mirnac ~rt_ I:ut Cy to-a,:.:; I.% million. resort n:ana~~emcnt. 1 ltr { star „ have rmrcr- a~~•ays, unlinrtc~.accrss nt reatat rr;tier- Glen lvy Financial Gr;iur is also tics available em the eoasrof San Die~;et, ties, as wel! as trtvcl hoo~nin~; ser•; ices, chit: nlaue ur of a sales and marketing divi- Oru~~e Gtunty and Venturi Cetunn•, in free trtvelers checks and car rental di>- 5 lion, resort drvelorment, rrorertp man- P:tlm Srrin}s, 1.~lemterey, San Frtnciscu, counts. Their memhershir is current!)' 4~ get :+ge:nent, crave! eomran)• and eonscruc- Lake Tahoe, Arizona, Care Cod and arrntaching 100,00. '~i ma1 tion company. Jt has resorts in Califur- Mexico. ~ A recent eamminnent made m the ~j ado nia, Texas, Utah and Hawaii, tinieshare industry by the ; sec ~.•ith }Mans for ne~a resorts in G G - !••L•trrion Curroratic~n is a } riot Palm Uesert, si}; &ar, Maui ~~l'1•H T~ GROWTH OF sign that the industry has in ~ and along Caii(umia s coasa come cif a~;e. When asked if line. Another as err of Glen me i•.~SHARE INTO AWELL- timeshare would camrete we ] resorts is that ~ uu're with their hotel di~~ision, Ed always buying interest in real n ~~^ej n' t .~D TRUSTWORTHY McMullen, Vice President in ~~~o estate and, once 60 rercent ~GIJ V.LLy.1 ~ charge of ~•acatictn o«•nrr- ent of a rrsatrt is sold uuc, that ?~T~'~D~~ shit, said, "On the cnntnr)•. tov res~:r. becomes the prcr-~erty Il~TDUSTRY, 1~11:~IV~ J 1\0 It's :t utmrlimentary• stir- iul of the owner's associatit:n, nt ment of our hosritalin• husi- nit the r~nwn by laws.ttOu»erts DOUBT THAT MILLIONS MORE nproma~ni f x exraaic n in he are tree to ehcxtse their ot~~n this fast-growing segment of Cv management company, but WILL BECOME II~TVOLVED IN the vacation industry." in all eases Glen Ivy's }•4an- Thtre is nit hater exampee dt` - agement Division has been VACATION OWNERSHIP IN of this symbiosis than Mar- s" • chosen to manage. the daily riott's clans far making Mar• cu business of the resin. > > riorc Hurel and Villas avail- if Califomia Riviera Vaca- 1 l.RLi DEC~E 1111L~. able to their Califomia time- bt clans Inc. is a timeshare share a~vners. Marriott uwn- eompany located near Dana en alit become members ai Point, an area known as the Califomia A relatively nee+• prtx3uct in the time- Rrsart Cand~~miniums lncrmacictnal, :t ~ ~ Riviera. Their first timeshare project in ~ share industry is the urban timeshare, a repucthlt exchange network pragr.~m. tl~e area was the Capistrano Surfside ~ resort timeshare found in chr tin: Urban Thr Marriott Ownership Resort's lnn, a 32-unit coastal land resort which timeshares are far rrttple who like to plans for California will include a sold out in three years for 521 million. vacation ar tike time off in the city. One national and intrmatianal networking } Their newest project in the area is the of chr hest examples of this is San Fran- 5)~stem. They are actively negotiating far - Riviera Beach and Spa Resort, offering a Cisco Suites on Nah Hill, where you're several sites and are hopeful cif being in true vacation feast with pools and sun close co everything the city has to offer, the Califomia marketplace in early ~ s decks, spas and game roams, along with with cable can right ouuide your win- 1989. Primarily, they are fcxusing on ~ t discounts on green fees at area golf dau: Owning a week or two here gives three areas: the Califomia desert, beach- l 1 courses and memberships at Dana Hills you access to an elegant 19th-century front pn~perties, and a ski ioracion. 1 c Tennis Center. Vacation suites in phase st?•le suite. They offer a bonus program The cimesharc product is one char fits E i one mill have 21 one bedroom ocean that makes the suite avaiUhle to you fir the sryie and financial realities of mc~t ~ ~ view suites with 6~0 square feet and nine additional days with six da}~s notice, people's lives. With the gravKh of time- ~ ~ l ta•o bedroom ocean vien•s with 8i0 O~~~nen are also able ro trade with other share into swell-re~ulaced, trusc~+~onhy ~ square fret. Prices begin at under urban timeshares found in New York and industry, ~~~ith excellent properties and 510,000 for a week. London; alanc with the resorts offered ser+~ices a~~ailahlr, there's nee doubt that Another company to emerge in the by lI. Urban timeshare has quickly millions mare wi11 hrcemtr involved in vacation resort industry is Vacation became a product with the highest ~•acacion ownership in the decade ;three•. Resorts lntemationai (VRl), a specialty demand ratio in the timeshare industry: DcMullen said it hest: "Timesharing h:: management company that offers cam- Another innovative company to nowhere to go but up." 13l AUGUS7 1988 tf5 WUII 1. C° G-:i17 a0.7~2 aifcCSy,7 ~u~ s i~~s e• -r_t7 _ - - rr r ` s i~ .e-Shy yes Sh~d;!i:~b Fad ima;e hS 1,x,•_(..,0, ` " ~o. alio;ls 2-?nter Market +~rff AA41 (nc n~~miwr NuuJrJ Ay . •..rJunr, um ttut ur the b~?~i urt Darineaa, ones a ma{net for 19y0r tAn kd many 11derNOpen to ram anise and other r:cary opcntera. ton.en rnWlabk eorrlo prgeetr mto if ahedd+ng iu nepuve ima{c and bnrenAare remora girl fLurl thr marltt yuinin{ Rsrrcubility as nutor cprpoR• avrtA Her vnru. Many proreca 1•CR uommortimothtluentivemartec. poorlyOtagncJaruluhrmamlyfaikJ. Such Aa•yYei{hn» Manion Corp., At wommer eemplainu mourned, HJton Cory., t;xneral Ik.ebpmtnl Haraii considered banning time-shires Cerp. ¦rul SAm too Cory. Aave recently alroynhrr, and in 1960 Fbrida'a auor• waled tAtlr daimt in the lirtu•aMrt racy ycncnl mud rules indunry, bnn{ing frnaneid rubilityba yoarninytimedhaRUki.r- Dutinca Dace plagutd by Ai{A•pRaaure In 1961, sAt Florida k{ialature parxJ ucuu and bu m•etmems, indunry one of Ne tuuon'a fuU and touyl+cu ofLeiaH uy. V+a to Ryu:a tc the trme•sh»e indunry. ^TAt marginal play<n Aart been Sins thtn, mmt warn \a.c eructcJ Ouahed out' urd David Bro+n, eAUr, kpJanon tAa oW4Ya bad•6uA pro- man o/ Mumi•based General Dtrcl• mouoty, requirts proyxt ttueaytn to opmem Corp., tAc biyyett utnt•share be IranYd, protest buys dtpana and comps ny to thtnwon, mandam ^coolint-efT" ptrroda in 7r.od Behan b iRmt Alpt rArcn Doyen un bad owl of eentncts. Trmr•Manny, rhrcA b<{an in IAt Florida Hill retxi•a eomplamu aborn FrcncA Alpa in tAe 196fn and +u 1»tr Myh•prrmurr Yka tacos, but tAt eapontd to the U.S., allow raauoners number lot dee4rrtd aMrply m Reenl to Duy Dlocts of umc, typrcalll in ont• y°n. Santarn urd. re7t penoJt. to auy in eondominruma lured by improved busincY ttan• or Raon uniu e•cry year for up to a0 Bards and prof t opportemtrn, mater y<a n. ec-Wr.•rs are no+ mo•iny rnb umc• In wme ants. Doyen can trade their ~O Thar goal u to up imo a taryr +RIS rn one location for tomcone elte'a p1OI of middk•rncwnt wnaranen rho » anotAu raauon spot. A yroriny are Gndmy n more drffrcvlt so aRord number of mternahonal °eacAanye {hc'r ors rarnron hotno. Banta' alloy peoDlc to rwp for nmt» In May. Gtneral De.ebpment Carp. resoru throughout she rorld. asrtnpAencJ w porsren by enrsspkuny Over the ndeade, the indoor Mt lAe S<r5 mil4on atyurution of Ca4ior• Ps Y nu•baaed Gkn !q Finarrcvl gr.wp ~ aoandtd st • 1 nm. ruA I;+. • ,w .rl lu sre.•Jur: rawut. w uk+ •olurnt {mrmc Irum 3:Y1 mJ4en W[ntrn watt.. m 19yt l0 17 bl4on at IAe nW of last '(rurc•alsart win ¦R etlavLLnl to year, aeeordmg to tAe International aeeeunt for one•tMrd of tAt tbamr• Foundation for Ttme•Shann{. The based eompany't hrarotn tAn ye», number of U.S. time•sAaR prgeu Aaa Brorn said m an interrrf.. itureard from ai in 19yS to more than Houl pant Mam«t Coro• a YhreA I,OJJ today. entered the umt•sAan brrnrres+ ro 19N, But umc-sNRi initial sucma r» is aho on an espantioa tan{r. uinttd by sMdy and eflcntima ilkpl Barry CoAen, taurkdiny direeto/ for >a lea pradixs. In iu early dayty tAc iu Martiou Orx7Nip Rmru Inc. \uYnaa »Inaed ame of tAt umc unit, Paid the mrapany ewrtsady oYro ope7awn YAo tneked m.e:ton snt° fire dme-aluR raona. Aae atwtAer bvytny Yortlslas Fbrida s.ampland in tseder eomuuetson and pt?nt to bare a • tht 1960x. rout of 71 projeeu dy tAe year 2000 ^Baet in tAe 1970s and arty 1920x, Another major \dtcl clam, Hdtat _ ume•tMrt hard-rely YuR;' urd tldl Hacu Inc., rRrntly eseraJ rrwa pat Santoro, enf. l eAief fey tAe KaIYR lu rk•e4M *<+t*al urwc.Jure h Dries Bureau of Trtnt SMR The toonsroMtaieo agency reyu4ta iAe natron'r byyen Diraey Re~wlatrrest eerretnuatron of uaste•sMR sons, smounting so 2: of tAe total. Glr(or• At tlse iaJuttr7 deans ssp w ivyc. w RnN rcen0 ritA 1116. Wdr panty Ce. saga ar apm Some ukamen promised apennve a"~i{away t\e , s for \mWmg . pfn to Wra pottntut \uyen to their Imrt'thart projeeu aror panty WerW oRrea ~tal sent tAsm stay empty- is Oflande. as ato tlut s tarK?ly landed ^Ob.reualy tAty YsRa1 yang ~ . ~ y ~e tax Ia11hNiR squat rrf to pn a.ay a Gman w a 2:.500 t\c US. afuwrowd: Saw\ern urd. Tht aaryes Gtr tarr.rRaR afatar.w• n One tMllt•WR tpenap sent from rordJk ~tareriss ArarorNay b a rascal Ywl \ tAc ! , ~ Reawt awl Yale le Yate scOtny rrun th» .cR Neaakntnl L' . i Aaaasauun, ue•sr Wih rmd lltt fedenl Trade tMtypealpaytru~araied•NynnraW Camm~tron tauyM up YHA ban and sad tab a tartdiu iatsane N a\otrt • Bur{ta \im YiU tlsepure \aYtrra Sa1.300. • quota. Tane•ttate price raa{e fto~ 22pf10 i1wYa Inpeta ftrRad a 225.000 sad a.aye a\oat f2JOD. M FWida, tM 1aeMesw arat eern• irdtnsry aQsaah say 7. . _ - - : ' - - ' j, , _ .-r.....w - _ - - t~•1 - - 1. - • - - . - .L>. - . - - - - - - J ~ _ _ _ r( ~ ;mac:.- j .\•y _ 1 •t.:,•t wr~ ..S t ~~x .S-r".~..~~.. •v,a r•t-:J %t: ``lt.~'~. 1 rs yt. n. ^`•~~>~'~~.:f•~.3'}•~1a1.:•='-c,:: ti=%.i1:6 .l,Sf..>.. v ~J:-~ i ~f..-~• _ ,,,~-..•.~j:;, -t -mil'"::- ~~:::i+r'.. t _ ~'t't .a.~+"'r'~.".~:•~ -'Yr:" :x s3•"'::..,.....+•• ~;y4~i°,:-v...'i~:y'?;~iti....r .r •.~It.. ti:T ~ . ::`4- - _ __,~;»r-t' #~.,~.:-,ii" ti stir a.-• t~. >-tr. _":--sa~t2-,': .~;1:~.; ~ ~±~.'k.',~t+e ^i 'i` ~;i.~ tt :y'~: .`L _ :.a . _ - - .:1'~ -l~ . r y- .a~;.,Y:~~., ,_,~b=:iJ:~sa~;; .y:;^., . -C ~"A'+ST,lI`~'•~•.: h,'- Y1•. - _ - • fit.. ' ,.Tl:: i. r.,l•y~ .F.. ~.I,-I, -S:.%', - Flu:.1~{r -'1 ~:1-.. ~t4iw,~..;_L. a..r."~i''`.ti: ,~F.-:__.~'~c~~+-: ~ ~.V ,+,{.!-yr?~ r.... -li^.! Y: t,t~i• '.!.'`74.._ ;4 ~~N...`•, 4.'~,- "io-t~ .-i•• .^-•titiu• :~f' =7':..• -K-,^.:•!':..~ ~`^y+3~:•~~~.".'-(?JRt •y~i.,~. /f~.`:. - jKj 'I..11; -11^ ;~.rt:,l {~'tti .y,. ~~",^5"+ ~,n =Q-C: .•`Yr~;•„~A Uwr...~i~ a. .c.}-~. .~,;r~~3~!-.~.,. ..1...•' - - '~':.:a: ' , _ r^ wry •fic a 'L: _ ,ri:`i• ~Y3~+j>.:::r,:_~. ,,~'~Y~•.s:~t..Ei~•~1:=»~+''=~•":1T:i^vY~aa-~i•:!::x„" 't~,.-.,.fiib'•w'~µ'S'.:`.~ .'Y'....~ wt:.,.,, .1.:~:., .."X_: ;i-~s_'.-ya~'l '~,t~s_l,v_, ~,b vtR~.-:.'~-%.~i•. iy it.•Q'...~it • •S••`~},:rv7~i ~>i~~yv:-:rti.at... r-": ti,=,, : ~C.:, ,•u.~r ' «)i.• c':i -•:-J, t •y-:~~••Y. +h~.~~l~~. at'u:.~,"~'';t~;.~LY-•+i.:.~}•r"Y,1+. Sr,..i .L'4Ti ?i~.~?.~•."_. •r. •..S'yr~i~• ~S~ ~T'• ~~1~~-i7-tj 'n~ =S t..~1; i:y7ntl r`-~:,, ~v+~'( •.G~,... ~r,.~~~T ~ L._ ~~~'-/`,+~~~"'~~_^+.,~.'.Y~`•,',:`'. - ~ ~~•i'w ,,~~t~~''. iS7'' L ti~3Sf~' b.. I ~.:,~•a:i~ •v~ .k..t.......d~.i:.=~'....7~s+teY~'`S.-~~l';Mtt,~',kt .a.,~ fi:ni~' - ,..r-'-"' tv.':~"'w-:. •.•T•.•-~-tZ'•-~: :.~-Y ~%..+.wrt. 'emu. ~ ~ ~o..i: ~ 7:1` 3 t-'`- yr;'c:~54,'~,s,c;. i i~~•.l::i~~rK~:J,~',.'~,~-t~7i - ~ S20,OOD: The price toy of a weet, in t,•:ntGr SG.DOD•59.500: The cost o: t: litehme o1 wceY.long va^ations at the or summer for t3 two•bedroom, tw•o•batn t:SBUi Sunset II development on tn~ isl2nd of Naui. Along with a one suite at Lake Tahoe's Ridoe Tahoe. U.. o' two•bedroom lodging, you pet to sv:im, fish, snorkel and wind surf season, the cost tlrops to 516,600 Time sharir;_, that blacl; shech or va- TileSe Gays CaUaOt.tS time-share 565Ct less titan it would cost to pu; your cation. fads, n:ay b~ overcoming its b:,d ~U}'ens In th8 m2rket fOr dream- f2milr up in s couple of hotel mods for re^. 1: used to be that misleading attd ~veel; at today's average rate o: _ /7.E5 high-pressure sales tactics, failures to d~- vaCatiOn hioeatvays are a IOi a da}'. Br the ycsr 200, when that avcr- liver on promises and the difiiculn~ r,f leSS likely io get burned age hotel room is expccud to rue. S1S0 a stt•apping vacations ++•ith other time dap, the annual savings will top 53,00. sharers made it near tt•xste of time even four total outlay ~~•il1 ittcr~ase, of to consider a time share. But ne~~ state 1,4ost developments set! you your weel; course, if you finance you: purrh sc. consumer-protection 1::MS and comput- for life; c•tlters, for 35 or 36 years. l,ios: de+•elop:rs offer five to seven-year erized exchsng= net~vorxs to maize swap- In the L'.5., the average time-share loans, but interest rates tend to b: ping easier have turned time sharine in[o wcel: ru:a roughly 57,500•-just 5350 a hi;;h-currently around 16 or 17 re'- vacation option worth checkin; out- vacation over 3C years. Add your share cent. Thanks to recent Treasury Dc- ahci: ea: efuU}•. of the taxes, insurance and maintcitance, partment ruiin givinc time-share of+•n- The idea behind time shartin~, or "in- ~vltich avcrzge about 5''00 a ~veel:, and ens tax adorn:::gcs similar to those of serval o++•neship," is that you~get your the total comes to 5;50. That's nearly owner. of second homes, the interest on "o~+r." beach house o: ski chalet to re- the lone. is tax-deductible as long turn to far 2 set pcriad o.` time-usually •'••~•--••••--~•---•---^~----r••~~~--•-_•••-• • • •~~•1.: as you own five Meeks or less of cry•~`~~.~.tr,p~i'1~_la-:ul• l~'?rC'~'~";;~~~ Ulnt-S11JrtUntlS. one to lour weeks-year after year, with- •~;e,..., t; ~ _ ,1:.•.,.~._... ..•sf.,;;,~.;:.;__. ...._t;:~ Attractive as a dial sounds, out the hassles and exliense o. full o+vn- '.•~'_Growth.of:11.S~tirne;shanng~esorts;;_ ershi You s lit the costs of upkeep and - • • ! the details brat scrutiny. Herr . taxes with the people who have baut;ht • _ t,:oo~~'.•1~ seer few questions yo:: need to • . ' .t•:....::.:. ' ~ r. have answered before sigrtirte uli: ri=hts .:a the oche: weel;s. The concept ' - , : • • has become so popular that the number ,,~..,:r~'~~~~~"~~"""~~~~.`-• i~~o•~;~:--.~ ••t•~-j€ fxacUy what. are you buytngl fFN •Sr`I,~- of time-sharing resorts hzo-~ jumped from , + r.'4.~~T` ; Time sharing, falls into two cite- :~tia- r just eicht in 1973 to mare than 1;000 ~ ~-~:,,a,;~;, '•b•-' gorier: Ownership and nonowu- 1 ership. An ownership agrcemut:, to;jzy. last year alone,.saJes totaled 51.9 " w~ ~ = bi!ho^.. Fay fa: the hottest markets are ,T'~.•--1."A~ ~ ~t' ~i the most common, EivCS you zn ~ seoo ;soo.. j Fierid::, Hsa•aii. Califatnia and Colors-""-'~M"'•~~ I c''~ ~«:i1 _ insurers in the rest estate. !t is do but ~ .,d•rs-••.,• tiiiR~,j >~=•s. time-share retort exists in al- ' t ~ µ-~1 }.ours fo:evtr, to s:l., ~~'il! or • ~ I Sales r.:as: sttr psrt of the ta•nrl f nlortra^e. lindr: ntmct++•ner- o: lust about z'•• r ~ sieot~ aao,.,t _ ~ ::a~• po,l:etbook. 1•nu ctrl spenc 5=.500 ''r'` + ~ }mn:" + ship a:rrrment, you use the ir• ;~;;G~; r eommo~..tions for xa number io: :s n•inte: u•ecl; ir. ~ crampcc one- ~ . =%-'y:: t 1., , % • • Number becroor.~ likesidc condo, or 5•+0.000 for :~+v;tl ~ ~ •'20-°S"%%i of y>:ara. Ownershih tltcn rrvtn; Crris:raas .t•eek in a two-store villa at i!:,' as •c resorts -"r.`~.,-.,; to the sel!_:. ~i:i:a Gcno Cas~adss i:, F'uertc t~siia:ta, ~ ~ '~•~,;~'~i Some dr+•ulopers just sett] . hiuxicc•-comnJetr ~+•it'r, male strvice ~~r,;.:-K• yt. ''s•~_, ~~~.i shores in tb~ dwcilirt~ units: otf:- u- t,;,; itarr it: romnutn an:; .•o owe, rivste sa•immint: pool ~ ~='~~~0.; 'r% er, inclose a p rtes !..`~t;glis.. F"~~LeS+><r..'-'-ii:[w,wea~lwollriYM+iSera'r _ A~me'`~^'' t 1 _ r-, 1 _ ~ ,t . . _ _ I • i - ..fr '.:fir; - . , - .'R . . ~ ; _ - _ ~v ~i 1. _ :a+..": ~ ~.l / - - _ V ' - i•\ i - _ I . • :f _ ,.u h , _ - ' ,•5 . E i:i~' '.f': _ . _ t ' J!' IY'- - - Y - ~7 - y' wx1 _ - - 4' 't - .A: - ~ f - . - .._~-•6 ..c' r~-~, ' ~ is ~J:~~~ rJ.: ~ -,1:,~ . G:~ _ _ _ - ~ - y ti J~ :7 -;irk. ~•s';•::r; ='_i;ir - =w• •"~~z •.t~' ~a:, .~s• -air- 'r_~. .1.`t^`-„'::' a~'.:: Wit, - ~Yn X14 Lr.l,'E'•~`•- ..N r• y. .w.r '~~,>,r y ~.,N•!'y J?~'1 f:r F'~'' - i3•t:4-~'.": 1.-'~~• 1 1 'K~:.: •'.?~i~ .5 r. ~/j'iy~ :1~~ Yf..`tir/` n "':•1 )n it i~. ..~i:~ :'.':t_• J.J" .T~ ~'.Jj r..~.y~ ~><.1.C1'.::.'t~..... .'?.i~:. ~.,,.~r t-.r ~t~ .s!~ _ '~S• 'j':.: .1 •ll = f 3t- 't' '••._,<'~2~J•`• d~.c.". -1~ .`-,~`+~.~f~t~r~4.;- ....~%;:cn.,~~ .:•~'L•L'F` ":;~45t ^X' ~~j - .t. ~M=`"1 it: ..'yf•`i': :C5"tt.yl'y.~.-tt'...`.K~., ;C. ..~"-~l,..e'.• .t<t cltyl `fSi.-~~:%• Y.:;~~.:•:j. .,yr„R _,t,:,,•tT','ii:,i'-y:,txxi~,••'.:c'.';ii'• i~X.i..':'" '=r.•, .it.'•-t,••:;,-:,'r°'~ •r. ::-ti: _ :ice ~•t ~-ri. ~PZ :':,•~+~e. i~ I.Lti a,"..5 r•. .t< t: •.IV:rf• Y..r•. ..r~~ .i',.;~ts:.c'r,, •^:i2 f,•,~~~ {w~.t.. .,ter ~ c•.,, L 5'' 'F;~".~ .~x; x ~ fF - a`-'; •r.>~- _ k'~75'>:•;C:Y a;,o•. ,.Y... -,5,.t: "a•rc, a, ti•q~...,:f,~,oy;'S•i ~>,s{t,,-';'•,av;, }i'u•.. ,li;ti•4-~In:; ~~'=%i ::~t;~ j'i: r .l.{;\~:: ~--'i:`~%t=:: -ti..-r••!i= 'i'.v ~~•~•...~.~i` i~ .i iZ,_ ~ yi. 'X .=-'Y': er.y...Y~ .j: .~el`r~4v~r~!-1 i ••11,,x.: „fir . •,~•jt+i.~~y~~e_.. --3 a~~~i,}.r %;i •,ry ~_.•.1'!- ~4~ a;''r`n~'-•E T" '~2',,.1°~4_ 7 ~ r-' r rte.'.' - !t. i-s' ~i~` .r ''•ft:* 'vyl,. •-~'•~'~.t t`~JI ~.~,~+jn' (q l~~l`y. .V' ~MY~'F'~,•ii~.."::\J...~:,)T~'.; '_Zs.: ^'-tv.: (~1i r` ~I.. lt',{':fit:.~!:.`R z~:f'-. a J.~}' d: .rr'S'' .i..' ~ - ''~"t~..t-~• •R ~~JX, i~:. ..r~.V i-1C•:L ,..cZ J. -stir:1...:,,-.. -n•.-tr,:'i+ aS7f t. <,K;a .Th ;rl :r'!`r.!;, L;-^1- ..Jr,'?~~ j ~ ~-r. .~P~ "~1L ~ _ f ' i'~"a._ T-rr 1 td a t..} .~Nt~E• 7 i~ '•e ~-_i,r.%~• r1; ~a-',''~,;.'~"~•~~'.:J.. t.•' iti :,f •;.;,..s-•:- •11rt+i~+',^,V~{. '~:.'•S;•j:t"i~ :~.t n`'-%iy ~+a,;..•; L~t~..w~+ ':.4'~;..', .ri:r; ~-t:.!•rr. .V - ..;s''s •-.'.r1 ~ - 7c•L:s. - .:.rr~ ..'~'•'r~?;e~:6~ . :'k;~•1;. t . ~i:•;~5 ~;n;.!~rt:.x',;.r: 1 -6r~ ma'S.~? ^;.i'c''~~ i ~-.a' .1.71... ~ y,},.s,. ,g•.. •?~^'•7F!?~o .tit.. ~ rl.'s,~ ~ f s 5.,., ~'R1: 1.1. i 1,5,-...,a:,•: - ~L- 4 `:~:1:`'v V.s :w.c:"::+~;. e+r.;, ~',~ry i ,~,:~t.:~. l .z ,~~ftp.ti t r, '9~ 1;!t ,x•:- 2~a:s%:~ , 'd~ 1- ~-.+5r~e . 4`~~s,r:" •~~k„b,+'••,:.`~.r..v~ ~~_'.'L~','s::< t~•.~ s,~,*+c",~ ,.3r r~:;?,?:-1"1J~ :'i T;i•:.~',~•.~~h~;- -~1~ ~ ~l'~7s.::..~r t 2 J... 3••~^r•~r~~i~?:r_.tr.;:~i.t~'- ~ , ~A-; f~yr , 4F •k! S ~.r V: ; V. 1 i 1 W l.Yr, J.i ~l ~.(;s ;.t7.~`ti.s.. °~y+,•~;~.,, -1~ , •%.~f~'•,~ y••~,.{'r r Ll~; 41- }~r"•i'~~. , ex,"'1•a.'~:~- •-ca. r „t.,,Ci~ty..1»~..} tit i.~~'i';: -.-~[~yKh ~ 7t ~.~~J1`~ l•M:~ )~•y`j 4'1C~rL~L~Ir.1L~~ •4. r•Q~v ~,]~t.i'iT~~Yst (~.?'5,~.~-,~'l.O ~•~J~• bY;~ n,','~w ~~:t:~••{At, h~':.r.~+ \S~ 1 • ``~ap~, ~~y ~i.. 1 Y•. , L ~rj~ 7.,""7'•• -r L..,..K.,t; 'Y•i-:•! / `i' !1 ~`a. •t r t r .L 'a.., _ L t"1 ~ e; y ry, •y1- .:~tss.•rNY. - •ita),N , r n.~iJ-~.i~'„r••. j-a=:lJ; ..IN. .~.4 t ,i•.,, ~.a.:.•, r;• r `ha . F~-.5~ 3 ~,s\ rte. y fv cj ~ _r7 •n -tS' ~ tir:'~'''.'Ft,! r~•r • vc:.~ ~~"S y;. t~ , 7'~..+~^+ ~br1y _ai ~ 0. ~1 ~:~.-i 71 tt~7fa'y;?r~ V- P t•a Y r• J 1' •V~°.. lw' ;,..,~'!:.cY.._ .~1., a ~.uti+Yw..,':.' .t,..+'~~fr~( ~.i,~~•;~'irar!• ,.•!a~-[ ':rrl4 ,i".'Y';'~q~:{kv~'~~.~; ;h~:; r+~ti:+a:a-,~.r." 1 r~i~n~~'~{!'4^ •)l~'=:.: L.-.y,_ .v..•rtwG..~.:nt~.1! C'.Y It~- '~.a.%%• t .CC "':'i Y -'b"Yi~~.if'+J••n.+s~'QFIY~ .1•.L •Y~- Jw~~~ rk'„` •-~;r• ~ R,.";'; Yi,:t+'•~,e. '~.f.5~;.- Jr ?'.:vt~~•«Tr~rLr.? '•..~ry+~'•, 'rt-•• ~''J'".'~'''~•~:'~' SL'.SUO: i ire averactc pace of one. weer. is year the ~'IStana neson, nGat tlp1, Gi_ney Vlorl„ Itt Lai:e BUBna ~ 151::. Ylc. It bUVf'. VGU c Vlllii lho: sleeps eicttu-and Inc use of t< tEnnts Courts and ihrcG pools arcs, surlt the poni and clubhouse. su~ecst that yot: rtakr yo::: requests at hi~hcr ust:rssmt:nt~ late: on. Ho,+• much Jaw. Clinton liu::, ar ::aorncy and pre;- Icas: t,vU ~montit. bt:fort: you \rant tc• of the m::intcuanct: lee is being set :,side iJC:1S o~ Rr,on I'ropenr Owners Asso:i- travc! :utd that you he fi~xiblc by listing t~ b:,ild fund for nu:io: repair>'' A ::lion. ,riticit pubitsite; nc,vslettcr ano faun alts:n tine In::a:ionti ~r dates. ~actci rule of thumb. sa_v1 nc+vslettcr puh- •u!inc,akti ct:t time sh;:rind: "?,:any buy. • V+'hat arc Iht: prospCCts of rtsClling? lisher Burr, i1 ti.:n lU percent ct' yearl~- it,itcvc• rite,- o,5•t; :h: co:ttmc.^. elr- Tirttc sit•trin_ shcwld b: rt:'ar:it:d n::,intta,:+nc•r fr.>. shoulc! !>r ea:m::rl:c:i ,^enu. After sales art: contPlcted, Cher to save crone}• ot. ,•acatiur, costs- for ntaiar csl,cnsc>. .4.i: ter lee tit: re- learn :hat the dcvcio;,e: sit! o,rns these no::a real-estate investment. Accord- sort's schedule for replacing itcrn. such facilities and no,+ +wants tc sell there: to ink to Con~olink, an Omaita firm that as roofs ane interior decorations to get the o+i•ners' association-" i=o: a fee: sam- handles resaies and rentals of time-share feel for u•hethc:• sufficient funds arc bc- nie copy of the newsletter, contac• the units. atime-snare interval +,•i)1 be on rite ing allocated to rite reserve fund. RYO.~ at P.O. Fios ~:9~. Northbrook, market for an awer:a•e of 31 months, any • N'hat are your legal rights and obllga- Ili. 60063, e' a: 13} 3:6-56S5. o+i'nen seldom cet 'ttacl: morn tit:::: ~0 to tlons? h9ost s::ac laws reuuire ful! di:- • tioK• much leevti•ay H•Itl you have In plan- GO prreent of the original purchase prier closure by dr+•rlottrra and ltrotrct rou by ntng va~ailons? A rypic2' time-share in- itt rite resale ma:l:et. allo,,•in~ a "cooiin~ o?" period of thrc:• :er~21 is on: \veek--either tae same \+eek Dut tl;a: also mt:: ns bargains for huv- to 10 c:,ys in ,which to change your min.: eat:, yea: o: z fioatir.; ,?•cek, \which ens. Resale and rental agents will put after you sign. un. Most states aiso rr- mexns wou'li here to reou..r, 2 +weel: e::ch you in touch +wi:h sellers. it's cool idea quire that an escrow- account be sr: uP to +•es:. ]f ,-ou choos: "fractional owner- to cacti; out resor: b,' rCnUn~ a wecL• take care of unfmishrd w•orl; should a s^i-." you'll .et ~ number of weeks from an owner aae's lrwing to sell. developer default b~forc completing con- sa:eac o+•er the year corresponding to Could your annual r;,alntenance fees s;n,cnon. 1-SUt it's +t•isc to ask about spe- tit: size of your snare. S uu~rte: share, r2ptdlq escalate? Aroiects that star; off chic situations. Arr yo:: liable if :utothr: for esampie, w-ouid ; ive you 1 ~ \veeks- crar=in. very to++• fees often haw: linan• ow•ncr fails to Pay tits maintenance fc.? p:rh~ps tr.*et or four weel;s c~~l: s:ason. ci;:l problems or end t:n charging si~arply In most case. you shouldn't b:. li you The:;•~ a a•ay to keen from brin_ arc buying a r:~ht to the rtal estate. you lOCkeu-' t:rt0 tnC Sam: w;;~aaOn sr:tt nr 1".M:+%~cb. y ',~{~~t'-° SnOUIu bl' Ctrl:irtl \'oC rCCC1Yt c illlt:- :imc slot eael: near: Chore a resor of ii- ~ • ~ ~b* ~ i-= insurance Poli;•:, w•hi~l: veriti_> that you i;:;ed with one of the resort-e>;cli:uuc. ` have the deed ~to that property. • W hatrvrr et.s,..ntC~s networks. Resort Condominiums Irate:-~'1 t t • ~ " ~ you get, get rational ani; lnterwal lntrrseional, for s' . ~ then: in writin_. Tim:-share interests are e~rmpl:, can help yr.:: trade weri•s w•itit ~~c~.`'~ ~~~ti subjt:e• to tht: statute of frauds, ~ ia++• -•r ~ t: requiring tita. contracts inwo.+•in, real thousands a time-share owners ~,orl r. t r• wide. l'ou'li Pay ar r._; \ ~`-'4~•~ 'fi'r- -t~~.t ~\•:itten. And nc r.::atr: ho+ ound a •ca: to ~ . ~;.y~-,. , estate he bt:?one :c• an e:.ch::nc_.:•:t,., ~i0 0.* ~.2s,a,~•~.Y~•• . ~•('tc: ~^~'r-~ t:.:<tw•orthr tiacsntan are^t:. i;'s dan- s,wa;, your w•eei; fora .wet:: of cot'itpar:;- Y~' :~,ri".•~ ;t,._:.`~ c::nus to be s+4ayed b~~ attics Pitch bin 1'~l'Je 3i altoln r f S : r' • ~ ,e t' ~ a ,'A::::11011. M-1":ta:'s w'hett e t O: r, 'c Ct: ai .r t ?•Ir '~.r. ~t• - \1'i:11C yOl: Gi:. ' ~ ~ ~~O'' ^`'~'j~ • 1C ICi rOnuSt~ Of • ;_itoc curin_ peal; ski seaso.:. for ~;~J~'s.;y. ~O.rr-~-;~ you're mos: • -ab P a cxart;+l.. c::.. be leaded f a air-season i~- r wa~ tines. 7"al:r th; " 0.' pe -h t I:ICii tie p: CI'C::Stt weei:... ~n CtCan rC50f:. I~wOC Ow:C Oli- ~ ~~t~-. +~I COnlr:,aa at1C1 Gt:CId: O:t y<t4: antttr lLr; .tr_sor: time, yo::'li usual!, hart: to pl:+tt iCttornev Clinton: Burr takes notes on a het++ real t1t•,t pre>ntise cart b:. of•-sezson w;:~atiot: no ttt::t:;: w•aerr 1~isconsin time-share development for ' t:,. YO: bast retiuit the e:;clta:t::~ his consumer-watchdoc newsletter u; iErr: Tnorn:sar• to ?vG,'~ Yon. ::.S.~~v:~ t 1•.'~n:D R:punT, ttat t9EE 71 rr~., .t ;'r.j~ 00~ ¦y i.. ~}~y~+~y' ~ ~sqr, ji~~{ ~ a ~ Z' rr ~ N ~ Ai` QA ~gI'°w+ Q~ ~~~+r'•`•~•~p~,•'J • 0. ~ ~ ~ t ' aww':S ~ ~ l: `ir~ d ~ '~t4~i' ¦ Y!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r..: a ~ t,'ar:: R ~s? ¦ Y ¦ 5 Ycv !s~ a - - i' O ~.1-ri.c:'t Ow~tership Resorts probably will start sales on at bast six nelw VO projects this year - ~ ;'rich will have a tonal of over tzei~~ 800 units. The firm is starting sales in several new :~.~rl:ets. T1iat's the biggest burst of growth ever by any vacarion ownership company. ales began recently on three new highest profit margins, of any major New projects by . MORI projects, marketing probab- timeshare developer. ~ Marriott .t ly will begin later this year on three MORI is going to this faster marketing ' Gvt~nership Resorts more, and this new inventory - pace with a product package that is both ! ~ together with VO projecu already refined and proven: 1 C3•press Harbour, Orlando. Cypress in sales is exported to more than double the s High-quality unit. 'Ihe firm's standard Harbour, on a 50-acre site within walk- company's 1989 sales volume w in excess of two-bedroom unit evolved from around ing distance of Sea World, began sales in S100 million this year, according to executive 1,200 sq. ft. at Monarch at Sea Pines in the March with opening prices of S9,500 to vp and general manager Bob Miller. mid-80s to 1,650 sq. ft. for the newest villas S 11,500 per week. The plan calls for Why so many new projecu all at once? It's at Palm Desert (there are some smaller and 400-plus units. Construction is well known that MORI exec vp Ed Mc- IargerexistinguniuatStreamSide).Interior schedul^d to begin in May with occupan- Mullen, who heads the firm's property design, furnishings, and equipment have al- cy targeted for early '91. The project is search and development activities, has been ways been lavish. Iti10RI's third in Orlando and iu biggest scouring the destination resort areas of a Flex time. MORI switched several years there so far. The first two, Royal Palms North America for locations for several ago from fixed numbered weeks to open use and Sabal Palms, aze part of Marriott's yeazs. Mazriott's acquisition ~ w ~ ; ; , Orlando hotel complex, which was the procedure and plan- ~ ~ ~ ~ focus of themarketingprogram.Cypress ping/budgeting process for ~ Harbour is away from the hotel and will new properties is very xr `b''` go toe-to-toe with Euroacavidade's new thorou;h and time-consuming.. Dolphin's Court VO project in Sea For the mostpart,thebulgeof, c .v-. y ~ . World. new inventory is simply the ~ ~ " ' - ¦ StreamSide at Vail, Vail. MORI's result of concluding this exact- • _ first ski resort and the first property it has ing process on a number of new not built from scratch. Located two miles locations around the same time, _ - east of Vail, StreamSide began in the late Miller said. 1= 70s and consists of 111 uniu ranging Marketing considerations - from studios to 3-bedroom apartments helped bring on Cypress Har- _ in four buildings. MORI takes over 17 hour in Orlando where Royal ~ • existing unsold units and plans to build a Palms, the second of MORI's " 39-unit building featuring the kind of first two Orlando projects, luxury 2-bedroom, 2-bath apartments recently sold out. And main- HIGH-QUALITY UNITS, Ake this one at The found at its other resorts. Also, Marriott raining sales condnuiry figured Herltoge Club at Hatbour Town on HIItoR Head ls- plans to expand its hotel at Vail, which in the purchase of Harbour b~• are a hallmark of MORI's VO program. will add to MORI's marketing capabiliry Pointe on Hilton Head Island, there, where the company is looking at a gap be- within seasonal periods a sysum that af- ¦ Unnamed project, Puerto Vallarta, tween the imminent sellout of Harbour Club fords greater vacation flexibility for its Mexico. Later this spring MORI will and the start of sales for a big new project owners. begin sales at its first. development out- planned for the Hilton Head Inn site. ¦ Honored Guest tie-in. The Marriott VO side the U.S., a VO resort planned for 217 Marriott doesn't disclose many details on ~ owner has the option each year of trading his units on the grounds of the new sales,profits, and acquisitions,butthefactit week for Honored Guest Award points beachfront Marriott 435-room hotel in is now investing heavily and moving aggres- good for accommodations at Marriott hotels PV. MORI has a 50-50 Mexican partner sivcly to expand MORI cleazly indicates that anywhere, air travel, and car rental. This can in the deal: Monterrey-based SEMEX, the ca.t.~.ation is keen on vacation owner- mean owners have the option of, say, a vaca- the world sccond largest cement com- ship, lion in Europe, paying only incidental per- . pany. The project will be marketed on• Marriott's increased investment in the field sonal expenses (MORI is also affiliated with site and in the U.S. also lends credence [o the widely held belief RCn. The Honored Guest tie-in has been a that MORI has maintained the lowest powerful VO sales tool. Continued nett page marketing cost. and therefore one of the Continued nut page - - „ r - - c.i. io ntn a Sub5t311La1- - ~ ( ~ - _ . ly increased t,um- Cohen t0 v~'?/rn~arkEfii; lct - ` r~: t~;:,V~-~.-<,:; ter of locations at a B: r: y Cohen ~~~as recently promoted to " ~ ~~~-'`-L5 - high level of effec- vp/marl:edno, a new post created be- ~ai~s~;~~'~; `V,.~~ ~ _ `~:"I~'~'~t , ~ ,zk., tiveness. cause of the tncreasinnly important ~ i' J .r!, 1 . •H ~~'~;~wi': •-t'r< "'`~`~''t•-:'~` ~ ..~._-...-~"~~'s ~~"ha~''~''~l• 1•filler admits that role marketin has played in the growth -\__._ti~_~ u~~ .:~Q,.l~~~r.. .r. vnn. a - ~a r-,~==,3.fr,-c•~;;~ ~.~:,`,_,:~Y.; the ision, :-r-,••*-.,.? =v-' } ' company is of the div ~t~~l~~''a~y."l~~,Y~i~`+`'-~; ~}E~^'.~' sf~etched a bit thin said Robert A ~ - `i.~:~ •}'-".Sr ~ Miller MORI 1 , r . Jr' In thts d.,partment" ;"raiu.i.. ; ;:i~:.....4 p~. ;I. ~ •Pt. Stepped-up re- exec vp and haw'' i;_~1~•'~=- J~~;~ ~~r~~t~~`~~wi~ ~ q~='f'~ - cruiting and train- general manager. ='t' . ~ ~ ~ ro rams for 'B has la ed ~ ~ s. , ing P g ~ P Y ~:;z~:_:~.:~.t?. marketing staff and an instrumental '~'''~'"yy*' salespeople aze un- role in helping us - CYPRESS HARBOUR, planned for 400 units-plus. will be derway. achieve the gratifying success we have ttil0il's third and largest VO project In Orlando. The latest batch experienced in the last five years." of new projects Cohen will hold overall responsibility io Resale program. MORI is one of the very won't be the last. Miller said negotiations for for all Marriott Ownership Resorts few v0 developers to offer a meaningful additional projecu are in process, and the marketing efforts nationally and new resale program. It is expected to generate SS company continues to seek new properties business developments internationally. to S10 million in resales this year (in addi- .throughout North America. He reports directly to Miller. lion to more than S 100 million in new sales), Although he did not say so, it would seem Cohen has been involved in real estate according to Miller. that certain prime destinations where the marketing for over 20 years. He joined With all these basic elements in iu pocket, company has not yet announced locations American Resorts in 1983 as director of MORI appears well positioned to roll out but is known to be looking for properties telemazketing. When AR was acquired new projects. and/or sites --Hawaii, for example would by A4amott in 1984, he continued in his It now has a total staff of about 500, up have very high priority. telemarketing position unti11985, when from 300 a year ago. Miller says the ranks fiD estimates that only two other vacation he was named director of mazketing of MORI's administrative, support, and ownership companies,FairfieldandGeneral services, and later national director of product development staffs are now pretty Development, probably will be in the 5100 marketing. He continues to be based at well filled out million-plus class this year, and that would MORI headquarters in Lakeland, Yet some people in the industry wonder if place MORI among the industry's top three Florida. MORI has the marketing and sales resources operators in 1990. New MORI VO projects a Paradise Island Beach Club, closed sales in California is believed to be Bahamas. MORI is negotiating to acquire on or ahead of projections. Continued from previous page the remaining inventory of about 40 exist- Sold out MORI properties include: Hil- o Unnamed project, Hilton Head Is- ing units of this development as well as ton Head Island - 122-unit Monarch at land. MORI plans to develop a major VO adjacent land where an additional 130 Sea Pines, 36-unit The Heritage Club, and project on a 25-acre oceanfront property units could be btult.lt would be the firm's (neazly sold out) 40-unit'Harbour Club at that is now the site of Hilton Head Inn. The second VO location outside the U.S. Harbour Town. Orlando - 80-unit Sabal development will either be a hotel plus 190 MORI also announced the recent grand Palms and 123-unit Royal Palms. VO condos or 290 VO condos in either opening of the first 28 case, it will be the largest of four timeshare villas of its planned 236- projects MORI has developed to date on villa resort next to . Hilton Head Island. Sales probably will Marriott's Desert begin late this year. Springs Resort & Spa. - ' ' ~ ~ _ ~ a Harbour Pointe, Hilton Head Island. The project opened for . MORI has purchased the land for the final reservation sales eazly ZS-unit phase of Harbour Faint,adevelop- last summer and - meat started by The Byme Corporation, received an OK in. Oc- c ~ , which now has 86 uniu in three buildings. toter from California's ~ ~ ' J For MORI, Harbour Pointe's 25 new units DRE to begin closing _ ~ - will bridge the a between the a roach- _ ~ • ~ S P PP sales. Althoug:: cam- ~~:..::a . ing sellout of its 40-unit Harbour Club at pony sources acknow- _ ' ~;:~,~Ns:;z• - - > ~ " - Harbour Town and its planned new project ledge some fallout in - ' _ - '~''•:a +.s'.... r. on the Hilton Head Inn property (see sales reservations, the FIRST 28 UNITS of MORI's Desert'pr~~gs facility above). overall volume of in CollforNa were comp(2ted recently. 1~ Resort Development - April/9 -r r~.~ ! ~ i ` -a.~ r 3r.~ ;,i ' SEA P11~ES REALTY A Sea Pt'ttcs Cont~art}~ August 29, 1988 Mr. Ben "Lagos ' President _ Palm Desert-Rancho Mirage-Indian Wells Board of Realtors, Inc. 44-475 Monterey Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Lagos: When Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. asked me to comment on the inter-relationship of Marriott's ownership resorts, the real • estate community, and the community at large, it was an assignment I accepted with pleasure. Sea Pines Plantation on Hilton Head Island is the Island's original plantation community, and set the standard for gated communities all over the country. As a small and selective community, Sea Pines Plantation is particularly sensitive to the balance of its residential, resort and commercial components. Marriott's initial vacation ownership resort, Monarch at Sea Pines, proved to be not only a complement to our most prestigious oceanfront neighborhood of private homes and villas, but also the source of business for The Sea Pines Real Estate Companies, of • which I am president. Our companies specialize in Plantation properties, with particular emphasis on Sea Pines Plantation. In 1987 we were responsible for approximately $175 million in sales: one half of all MLS sales recorded on Hilton Head Island. A portion of that business derives from Monarch owners who were Continued 20 Sea Pines Circle, Hilton Head Island, SC 29928, (803) 78i•3334 Mr. Ben Lagos August 29, 1988 attracted to Hilton Head Island as short-term residents, fell in love with the Island, and elected to make it a longer-term base: either as permanent or second-home residents. Their demographics are in keeping with our typical Sea Pines Plantation property owner, whose profile is upscale in income, education, and sophistication. The transition from vacation owner to permanent resident has been a pleasant one for everyone concerned. Monarch generates other sources of real estate business. ' Approximately 757 of the people who come to the Island to look at Monarch elect instead to look at longer-range property ownership. And guests of Monarch's owners often take the occasion to investigate the purchase of Island property. The constant maintenance and updating of Marriott ownership properties is a kep point in their attractiveness to neighboring property owners, to the value of their property, and to the community as a whole. Marriott's maintenance and management standards are exemplary. Marriott's newest ownership resort, Heritage Club at Harbour Town [also in Sea Pines Plantation] is very much in keeping with its neighbors at one of the most prestigious yacht basin developments on the East Coast. The demographics of its owners are, to the best of my knowledge, the highest of any ownership resort in the country. We look forward to serving the continuing number of people who will be attracted to the Island by Marriott, and who will - eventually elect to make it their home. Sincerely, ~~~f~ Paul T. Franks President rlr:pc i • Q~EA.'~FRO~?T IN SEA PI~~ES • August 29, 1988 Col. Russell E. Sweetman c/o Mid-American Building Corporation 58 East Franklin Street Centerville, Ohio 45459 To the Members of the~Palm Desert City Council: I understand that Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. has selected Palm Desert for the location of a new ownership resort. Having served as an elected municipal official for sixteen years, I understand pour concern and applaud pour effort to keep pour community in high esteem. It has been my experience, both as a long-time owner and as past chairman of the homeowners'.association at Marriott's Monarch in Sea Pines Plantation, that Marriott provides exemplary management and maintenance at its vacation ownership properties. Interiors are continuously refurbished, exteriors are kept in excellent repair, and landscaping is well attended to. In addition, Marriott's staff is courteous and businesslike. My family has enjoyed this beautiful oceanfront resort almost since its inception, and I'm sure I speak for all of Monarch's owners when I say_that we look forward to many _ pears of good relationship with Marriott. ~~1 S nce ly, ~ i~ _ C .Russell E. Sweetman 22 N PINOS DEL NORTE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 600 Vail Valley Drive P. O. Box 69 / Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-2747 August 15, 1990 Mayor Kent Rose and The Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Rose: It has come to our attention that the Marriott's Mark Resort Hotel would like zoning changes in order to increase their hotel density by another 53%. We are all of the opinion that Vail is already becoming too large and instead of the quaint village it once was, it is fast becoming a city of high rise buildings. When we all came to reside here many years ago, Vail was like a small European town and that was one of the things that attracted us to it. It has certainly changed. Therefore, it is our opinion to let well enough alone. If you change the zoning laws for one, you are setting a precedent for others to follow. The Marriott is already a high rise and Vail is becoming too overdeveloped, resulting in a major loss of our open spacPS. Our vote is definitely against changing the zoning laws. Sincerely, ar esident for Pinos Del Norte Condominium Association CG/vk " TOWN OF VAIL 1991 BUDGET TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990 Council Chambers 12:00 p.m. Work Session Items 1:00 p.m. 1991 Budget Overview - The Town's Fund System - 1991 Revenue Projections - 1991 Expenditure Budget - Employee Compensation - 1991 Service Levels 3:00 p.m. Public Works Department Orientation THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1990 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Works Department Transportation Heavy Equipment Fund 7:30 p.m. Capital Projects TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Council Chambers 12:00 p.m. Work Session Items 1:00 p.m. Fire Department 2:00 p.m. Library Department 3:00 p.m. Contribution Requests THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1990 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Police Department 7:30 p.m. Community Development TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990 Council Chambers 12:00 p.m. Work Session Items 1:00 p.m. Town Officials (Council, Manager, Attorney, Court) 2:00 p.m. Administrative Services Department 3:00 p.m. Insurance, Special Events 3:30 p.m. Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund Debt Service Fund Conservation Trust Fund Lionshead Mall Assessment District Fund Marketing Fund TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1990 Council Chambers 2:00 p.m. Budget Wrap-up 3:00 p.m. Work Session Items WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 8/31/90 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS Page 1 of 2 8/8/89 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for A new advocate for petition circulation is being sought. (request: Lapin) annexation. Cindy Callicrate to be contacted. 2/27 SATELLITE POST OFFICE (request: RON: Pursue station "in town" and/or increase Meeting to be set up with Ernie Chavez. Summer bus service Osterfoss) summer bus service? increased. 5/1 AMEND CODE, 12.04.240, STREET CUT STAN/LARRY/KRISTAN: Per Council direction, proceed. Pam has given original ordinances to Stan. Recommended PERMITS changes to be presented to Council in September. 6/12 VAIL GLO SIGN (request: Levine) RON/KRISTAN: Through DRB, or some other process, Kristan will handle by September 15. can the lettering color and lighting be modified? 6/26 AIR QUALITY SUSAN: Issue of passive smoke and smoking in Susan has been given assignment. restaurants needs to be revisited by this fall. 6/26 TED KINDEL MEMORIAL TODD 0.: Track down ownership of land to the south Land is all owned by VA. VA says a plaque can be placed (request: Rose) of the Christiania. If this belongs to the TOV, there. A letter from VA is forthcoming. Stan has begin to formulate memorial plan, i.e., park contacted Gordon Britton, who will have a plaque made up. bench, plaque, etc.? We are now just waiting for Gordon to receive plaque and give it to us to place. 7/11 BIKES/ROLLER BLADES AND SKATES/ KEN/LARRY: Should bicycles, roller blades, etc. be Researching appropriate ordinances for application in 1991. SKATEBOARDS prohibited from highly pedestrianized areas in the Village and Lionshead? 1/24 AG/OPEN SPACE AMENDMENT LARRY/KRISTAN: Legal research requested to make Research underway. ORDINANCE AG/Open Space 35 acre minimum per unit. 7/27 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES IN LARRY/STAN: Work with Holy Cross Electric to Scheduled to begin this fall. EAST VAIL establish special improvement district(s) for undergraunding utilities in East Vail. 7/21 HOTEL/CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS KRISTAN/LARRY: Develop list of hotels with Will provide by August 28. condominium approvals. 8/7 JOHNSON/GATES MEETING RON: Schedule discussion w/Bud Gates and Linda Will do. Johnson prior to November general election. WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 8/31/90 TOPIC .QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS Page 2 of 2 8/28 BUDGET CALENDAR COUNCIL/DEPT. HEADS: Special work sessions will be Sessions scheduled are: conducted for budget hearings. Steve B. asked Tuesday, Sept. 18 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers the Thursday evening times be moved up an hour Thursday, Sept. 20 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers to accommodate the presentation load. Tuesday, Sept. 25 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers Thursday, Sept. 21 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers Tuesday, Oct. 2 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers Thursday, Oct. 4 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers - this 10/4 date will only be scheduled if necessary. 8/28 FOREST SERVICE LAND USE STUDY RON: Staff updated boundary position statement to Council for review. Can the Forest Service be encouraged to complete a fractional study, rather than waiting for the entire Gore Valley? 8/28 SUPPLEMENTAL TOV BUS SYSTEM TO STAN: Prepare to discuss during budget review. Will be ready to discuss. MINTURN AND EAGLE-NAIL (request: System to operate on a "pay" basis, morning and Lapin) evening only. r ~ I • ~ . . ' . TOGETHER ~ ~ . . ~ ' ~ I N W CWB 20 ANNUAL FALL MEETING ~ ~ '1~. ~ - ~ ,u September l5. 1990 • - ( i i ' C 4J t0 Grand Junction Holida Inn L ' { ' ~ ~ I ' O i+ Y , < < ,5i~ p ' t: ..j~ e r4 Yt I y C1.0 O aJ i . You are cordially invited to attend the bi-annual ~r•, ~ x. ` • ~ s,:p d p ~ W U CLUE 20 Fall Meeting and Candidate Forum. This - i. n i ~ LL U tl1 'O .-7 ~ C ' year's session includes an imprenive line-up of ~ 1 ~ ' , , ,r ~ t` ~ \ \ ~ N a< C •'a virtually all the msjor candidates seeking to _ t" r i?, z Si ',;I}u' I; O O ~ O O ' 'O ' represent Western Colorado in the State ' , ~ t ti ~ , ° ~ ~ ~ ~ U u O ~ Legislaeure, U.S. Congress, Governor's office, and ` . ~ ~ ~ ..'~y~+.~ ` i c, ,xi• I O O ~ U \ U ocher important positions. In addition, this ~ ~ ~ C d ~ ~ ' ~ O ~ • year's meeting rill include a debate on Amendment y I v} ?T ~p V> 0! One, the tax limitation proposal. - . _ . NJ °V O1 ~ N ~ , ~ u 1•+ b M N • t1S a.: O C 1 DO The day's activities ril! begin rith a form ~ Oi0 GO.~ O RI N O betreen Ben Nighthorse Cmpbell and his - I H b u O O N u 1] ' congressional opponent, bob Ellis of Montrose. - , • Similar forma rill follow, providing attendees Z N y pp ~ v ~ September Meeting Schedule ~ rith a chance to hear first hand the tdeu of both I H U U C W O .-r 41 undidatae Eor State Treasurer, Secretary of State,' - Saturday, September 15, 1990 [-r C C ..a p., ,n N •.-~..r~.'.j and Attorne General. All Western Slo e ~ W ~ ~ r9 C \ ~ U .C 3' ' Y P _ 04 W ~ 7 41 v1 O I 7:30 Registration - Holiday Inn i~ legislative candidates have also been included.. I O~ b 'C7 D M X C y s)i.: is. W t0 N• N O O .d~•..., At the end of the day, Governor Roy Romer rill 8:00 Form U9 Congress, 3rd Dist. Ben Campbell and I r7 ctl N C' square off against this opponent, John Mdrers, A' Bob Ellis O ~ m O O _ rtl w. umber of key Western Slope issues rill be on their ~ f-1 Iz. a N minds... rater, highways, econaaic development. 8:45 State House #57... Scott McInnis and Dan Arror I ~ O a w O O N tourism and others. There rill be a chance for 9:15 State Treasurer... Gail Schoettler and Dick Sargent H N ~ 3 N C H C,' attendees to ask questions about pertinent issues I N CC ~ of regional concern, as roll. - 9:45 State Senate #6... Margy Masson and Sam Cassidy H O Z oq A ' C7 .-7 O O .a The luncheon keynote speaker, Chuck Henning, rill W U r-1 ?~7 N N u' provide some entertsiment to break up the day, so 10:15 State House #58... Bob Hale and Steve AquaFreeca 'I ~ H U C u RI': to speak. As a long-time political reporter and ~ y~J ~ "C7,• 10:45 ~ .Secretary of State... Natalie Meyer and Aaron Herber campaign follower. he hea collected 35 years of ~ Cn H O u N u hworous anecdotes about legislators, candidates, ~ overnors, and other ublic officials. He is the lI:15 State House #59.:. Berne Deane Briggs and Jim Dyer H 'l7 CJ .C 6 P C9 d •O 4+ L r' author of "The Wit and Wisdom of Politics" and has ~ ~ ~ :y _O 11:45 State House #SS... Dsn Prinster promised to liven up the day. ~ ~ ~ The form on Amendment One rill feature the Noon Chuck Henning/Holidome Luncheon I O ~ ~ .O W proposal's author, Douglas Bruce, of Colorado O C1. 'O d' Springs, He rill face format State Legislative 1:30 Attorney Cenaral...Duane Woodard and Cale Norton y Council Lyle Kyle in a lively discwsion of the ~ I ~ W U 2:00 State Senate #7... Tilman Bishop and John Moore pros and cons of limiting government i right to ~ N x 4) 41 increase taxes. ~ ~ ~ H ~ U ; ~ 2:30 Farm on Amendment One - Doug Bruce and Lyle Ryle u I U O1 Pinally, ending the day's activities rill be • live ( ~~~i ~ ,C ~ i debate at Tro Rivers Place betreen the two 3:00 State House f60... Levis Ents and Jim Celricks N y ~ y • candidates for Uniced States Senate, Hank Brorn of 30 State Senate #5... Don Berry and Bob Paetoce ~ E O •3 O Greeley, and Joaie Neath of Boulder.. The event QI ctl ~ rill be co-sponsored by CLUE 20, The Grand Junction I O C a 9 u 4:00 Covernor...Roy Romer end John Mdrers i - p0 y G ~ Daily Sentinel, and RREX SV, which will broadcast, , I \ ~.--r O ~ the event live. Proceeded by • public reception to ~ 5:00 Closing remarks y ~ ~ ~ W ~ ' ¦eet the candidates, the debate rill offer a'rate O1 O Q. U . chance to hear the tro candidates diacwsiing ~ O ~ ~ ~ .,a C Western Slope issues. ~ ' 6:00 Reception/1Mo Rivera Plaaa ~ ~ ~ O p' O ~ ~ ` O ' - ~ Z•W U A ~ U Mark your calendars, and be sure to send the ~ ~ i 7:00 Televised Debate: U S Senate.... Hank Brorn and Josie advanced registration forma in eariy.• You'll rant Neath ( to 'make sure you have a seat at this.onel ~ ~ ~ ' , , r._ti . _ . , I . . ~ . ~ ~ r HENNING '1'0 KEYNOTE FALL MEETING ~ I ) ~ r . `IEEE , • Chuck Henning has an unusual mission. " I. .j r ~~v _ Ne wants to dispel the myth that ~ E j - i politics' and govermsent are dull and ~ ` ! o ' I } ~ boring. He believes that both would m ~ f' I. ~ function bettee';sf;.ile;' the titisens ~ t ' ~'and•the elected officials, would learn ' i I - to take the, rocASS lees seriousl ` lip+'Sir y3 p. Y• ,".r r,s L f. vi ~ Henning has the credentials to do - ~ ~ '_~V'~'.`'"~~"~, ~ ~ I- this. 6vec since he erase to Colorado _ ~ 'a~"r.-.~- j in 1956, he's observed Colorado's I„ r ~ N government Lq action, During Chet ' tiwe ha wa a political reporter and ~ ~ " + 4 newscaster for KOA radio and i 0 television, He made his first trip to - ~ ~ C~ I the Western Slope in 1956, covering ` ' . •i ' the special session of the legislature .';_j~' - I which Governor Ed Johnson called to '~I i racomend a tunnel site through the j ~ Continental D{vide, Ne remembers It 'I ' u being cha day he Eicrt met John I VenderhooE, who vas pushing aLoveland • Peas Route, and Fay Deberard, who was , I •i advocating the Berthoud Pasa. "Big Pd" ~ ~ ~ - I f L wanted Jones Pass, ~ I• ` • ' • cn _ ~ i Chuck le Et the media to become a ~ a ~ 3 ~ lobbyist and trade association manager ~ ~ ~ ' ~ U 'L7 ~ Eor the Rocky Hountain Oil and Gas ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ .•I; Association. where he persuaded them ~ _ ~ ~ O to create a epeeial cosmittee on Oil ~ •i ~ U ~ Shale. He then went 'own to become i ~ ! ~ ~ I ~ 41 :`'•k~~:•„ President of the Savi s and Loan ( 3 N League of Colorado. Ne assures us he i I ~ _ ~ O y~ ~ } u'1 LLI ~ got out before the trouble startedti! ~ 7 ~ ' H C ~p He spent three yearn as a state 1 1 i • J ~ ~ ~ ~ • official, running the Colorado _ { i 1d ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ Advanced Technology Institute. ~ f ~ ~ ~ N ~ i ~ I ii ~ I~~ ~ .C CJ i During his State House career, Henning I 4 ? l: ~ p ~ ~ U vat appointed by four Colorado ~ ! ~ ~ i ro C cq Governors co a variety of Doarda and ~ ~ ~ :i ~ ~ ~ coaoissions which involved housing, _ ~ a i k i 3 I' local government, boom towns and state ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ i F+ ~ ~ energy policy. "Johnny Van", Eor s ; ! } u exople, appointed him to the Board of ~ 2 e ~ i i, j - the Colorado Housing Finsnce - j. ~ ' + r' i i Authority. He also served a term as a r, , ~ ` F masher of the State Board of - jf 1 j~ ~ ~E j • A$r1CUl[Ure. ~ ~ ~ _ h. 4 i '1 n #II F . Henning is ,a real political junkie.. ~ ! ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~ Duringlall this time, he collected i ~ ~ I stories and ancedotea about the - ~ ~ I legislature and Colorado polities. ~ He's also accumulated a lot of weird ~ - and wonderful sayings about and by ! ~~r;~< ~ . ire."- I r, ~ ~ _ I government oEELeiala; things they've _ ~'~l 8J'' ~ said as well as some things they wish - • w 1 - they hadn't said. ~ - i. Xe's put them into a book called "The ~ s; ~ Mil and Miadom of Politics" and will :~a'~i~ „`Z i 1 ,(1~1t~ store some of them with CLUB 20 ~ J - ~ , =i"' members September l5. ~ 'i ' I I' L Chuck Henning's speech will enlighten _ ~,Q - ~ , • us about the lighter side of politica. - ~ ~ ' j + ~ -:I , ~ . ( , , i I look forward t.:;.wo' orkirig, with ' 1-~._ - '+:v you. Please 1e~'me :k~iow ~vhen - a• I can be of service. in any way. ° ~ Kevin ' . ~o au~ s o X990 R ' ~ Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road l . ~ ~ ~ " Vail, Colorado 81657 ' . _ ; ii i : ; i : ~ i i ii i li:ai::saii:ii:::isis~:::tai:is'si:asi:i¢::fi:::ali:i .l tt ` cA1 1 ~ f~L:P~M~ ~ . ~ ~ w .J i 1 . i ~".^i' ~11a __"YY ::.033 ~a~lR'it`'R'L_~~F[~T . (602) 866.7710 ~ 20601 North 5th Drrve i _ Phoenix. Arizona 85027 1 ~ J Sevin ~andoCpk Bain- Architecture !Planning - Delineation t / i ~ 1 e ~l e (i~ To Vail Valley Activities & Special Events August 31 to September 9, 1990 Published by the Town of Vail AUG. 31 -WILDFLOWER WALK at the Vail Nature EPT 4 -TODDLER STORY TIME at the Vail Library Fri. Center at 1:OOPM. Free, ues, at lOAM & again~at 10:30 AM. -ADULT BIRD WALK at the Vail Nature -OPEN WEIGHT ROOM at the Red Sandstone Center at 9:OOAM. Free. Gym from 6-8PM. $1 drop-in fee. -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail -NEW GYMNASTICS. SESSION FOR KIDS BEGINS Library. Call 479-2279 to sign up -OPEN BASKETBALL at the Red Sandstone SEPT. 1 -CELEBRATION OF THE YEAR OF THE Gym from 6-9PM. $1 drop-in fee. Sat. HORSE, Ranch Horse Competition at -MORNING BIRD WALK at the Vail Nature the Berry Creek Equestrian Center Center at 9:OOAM. Free. at 9:OOAM. BB(~ & Dance at the -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail Lib- Hole in the Wall in Avon at 6P~~1, rary. -LABOR DAY INVITATIONAL SOFTBALL • TOURNAMENT at Ford Park al] day. EPT. 5-PRESCHOOL STORY TIME at the Vail Lib- -MORNING DISCOVERY WALK at the Vail eds, rary.at lOAM & again at 10:45AM. Nature Center at 9:OOAM. Free. -PLANTS IN~THE FALL at the Vail Nature -BENEFIT FOR PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED Center at 2:OOPM. Free. ACCESS TO THE WILDERNESS at the -OPEN WEIGHT ROOM at the Red Sandstone Gerald Ford Amphitheater. Gym from 6-8PM. $1 drop-in fee. -LABOR DAY BLOCK PARTY in Lionshead -BEAVER POND WALK at the Vail Nature from 1 to 6PM. Bands and enter- ~ Center at 5:30PM. Must have reserva- tainment, & much more. tions. Call 479-2291. -MORNING DISCOVERY WALK at the Vail -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail NATURE CENTER at 9:00 AM. Free. Library. SEPT. 2 -CELEBRATION OF THE YEAR OF THE EPT. 6-MORNING BIRD WAtK at the Vail Nature Sun. HORSE, Open Horse Show at the hurs. Center at 9:OOAM. Free. Berry Creek Equestrian Center at -MEDIA LECTURE SERIES at the Vail 9:OOAM. Library presented by Channel 23. Call -COWBOY CHURCH at the Berry Creek 949-5657 for information. Equestrian Center at 8:30 AM. -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail -LABOR DAY INVITATIONAL SOFTBALL Library. TOURNAMENT at Ford Park all day. _ -JAZZ ON THE GREEN at Beaver Creek EPT. 7-PLANTS IN THE FALL at the Vail Nature featuring "Images & Hot Tomatoes" Fri. Center at 2:OOPM. at 1:OOPM. Free. -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail -FAMILY HIKE at the Vail Nature Library. Center from lOAM to 2PM. $4. -JOAN NORRIS ART SHOW at the Vail EPT. 8-LITTLE FEAT CONCERT at the Gerald.Ford Library. at. Amphitheater at 5:OOPM. $18 in advance for grass seating, $25.for covered SEPT. 3 -LABOR DAY!! seats. Mon. -LABOR DAY INVITATIONAL SOFTBALL --MINTURN ARTS & CRAFTS FAIR in Minturn TOURNAMENT at Ford Park all day. all day. -CELEBRATION OF THE YEAR OF THE -BEAVER POND WALK at the Vail Nature HORSE, Polo Match at the Bobby Center at 5:30PM. Must have reserva- Warner Polo Field at 12:00 noon. tions. Call 479-2291. -(:OLORADO HI DR N_ .HORA F. ~QQ. ~Fa M. , - ~ Iateraal MCdicane 476--i 6UU ~e !pzo ; y, tP~Luu~ N~~~ers . .N sly-one d76-75io - Ch...~r.~c Can 476-0344 476-5851:' 476-057:1 Tlraasportatioa Town~~of Vail Buses :~pp1IIg _ 479-2172 Rocky° Mounan Beaver Creek Ttansi~t 94;9-612`1 Delivery 8c T'ransport .926-1066 Trailways Buses 476-513.7 ~ Customgaek 94.9-6655 Grevhound Buses 476-783'$ Mail Boxes Etc 476-3292 - ~ Red White Mt. Express 476=8731 _ .Airport Transportation Center .476-7576 Ge'beral Information ColQradp Mountain-'Express 94'9-4227 fail Inf~orn~ir~®~ .479-2180 Vans to Vail ~ 476~46Z Town;'af Vail` 479 X100 Vail Valley Tau 476-TAXI . Budget.Rent-a-Car :949-60I2 Heru"Rental-Car 47,6-7707 - Naaonal:Rental Car :476-6634 Parking Parking Structures 479`-2176 • Ski ,Ial,.....atioa Vail Assgciates 476-5601 Vail. Recreation Vail Nordic Center 479-?260 } Wormaton Admtnuttauve Offce/General Information 479-2279 Vail Resort.Associaton 476-1000 Gy,?,..asacs _ 479-~?87 Red Sandsfonc'Gym; (VB, B~B, Weighirootn).. 479-"?8.8. Cultural Information F Xeuth Center 479 X292` CtiIC (dance, art, music) 476j:040 Nature CeatPr (suinmer'only) 479-~?91 Vail Valle" -Foundation . y 476.-95.00 Vail Valley Arts Council 476255 • Tennis'(stunnier gnly)"?Gold Peak- 479-2296 Colorado Ski 1Vuseuin 476-1,876 Ford Park 479 2294 Bravo`"Colorado 476-0206. I;iorishead a79•~95 Vail Comrnuniry Theatre 476-0100 ,Golf (Nay to October)'..`, 479-^~"60 Vari Public. Library 479-2183' 'Jee Skating - Dovson~Atena 479-570 Child Care & Bab~~sitting - r ~ - Vail Youth Center 479 2.292 - "F .ABC Children's. Acre 476-1420 Hundred Acre Wood 827-5876 _ ~ ~ ~ Rumtilesu~ltskn School 949--590 ~ , ~ z Sus.i' g Vac'atton Gtiildcare 476-8666 ~ ~ ~ ~ wj Vail IIa>;vnttin ~ ~ ~ ~ " f ~ ' g 82.-579 ~ ~ y ~ ` ~ f ~ ~:r Po~~Pourri Day Camp ~ 479:-2290 ; ; Beavez Creek Day Came - 949-2306 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 a * • Church Services f~ i*~~~'' ~ ; . i ~ a~~' t ~ • ~ , • ~ ; Varl Interfaith Chapel 476-:347 • • ~ - ~ . Emergency Servues ~ ~ ~ ~'J ~ ~ Dial 911 in Emergency Situations ~ ~ 4~,~ ~ ~r~ ~ ` ~ ~fr~ , 'b~ . Vail Police (non-emergency:-) 4'79-2200 , ' -~gry~' ~ ~ ~ , Fire Depazttnent (non,-emergency) 479-2250 y~ ~ ~ ~r , ~ Hospital Vail Medical Center _ .476-2451 ~ ~ i ~ ~ e~..a~~v~,8JF3~x3 .~rwatiH ;~„r d~ 1Vornet''s~Resource Center 476=7384 , ~ ~ Vail Cta~iropractie Center 4'16-1831 ' ~ , ' ` :Parents: Anonymotu ~ 476-350 Doctor s Office ;476-5695 Eagle Vail: ~ni~al Hospital 949-044 ~ ~ . ~ f s~~ ~Yu ~ ~ r z X ~ ~C.~/~ .ZS ~C S ~lY~ ~ ~ ~ ~~w'~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~r ~ ~~e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ~ ~,~~-s ~ cv ~ ~ 1 ~ t t ;~v-~ ~ ~ v, J ~ ~C~~ ~ ~ c~~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ © ~ S~c9~ CJ ~ , y'~o~ 4 C ~~c~~ ~ ~ 0 c~ ~ ~ ~'a-=._ vim-- c~~~ s S ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~rG~ ~ I ~ Vye ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Ern. ~ a~ ~ ~ 1 ~~.~-5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a