Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-13 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 12:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Tour of the Village Transportation Center Z. Discussion regarding Out of Town Fire Response Fees 3. Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission Joint Meeting to Discuss Special Development Districts, the 250 Ordinance, and the Parking Pay-In-Lieu Program for the Village and Lionshead 4. Discussion of Regional Transportation Proposal 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report 6. Design Review Board Report 7. Information Update 8. Other VAIL TOWN COUNCIL NO LUNCH WILL BE PROVIDED WORK SESSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 12:30 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 12:30 1. Tour of Village Transportation Center Stan Berryman 1:30 2. Discussion regarding Out of Town Fire Response Fees Dick Duran Action Requested of Council: Receive presentation, make comments, and give direction. Background/Rationale: Council requested, during the budget session, an update on out of town fire response fees. Staff Recommendation: Approve increase of personnel fee schedule. 1:45 3. Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission Joint Kristan Pritz Meeting to Discuss Special Development Districts, the 250 Tom Braun Ordinance, and the Parking Pay-In-Lieu Program for the Village and Lionshead 4:15 4. Discussion of Regional Transportation Proposal Ron Phillips Steve Barwick Action Requested of Council: Further discussion. Stan Berryman 4:30 5. Planning and Environmental Commission Report Kristan Pritz 4:45 6. Design Review Board Report Shelly Mello 5:00 7. Information Update Ron Phillips 5:05 8. Other F To: Town Council/Planning and Environmental Commission From: ~ Department of Community Development Tom Braun Date: November 13, 1990 Re: Amendments to the Special Development District Chapter The ,accompanying draft. of the special development district ordinance has been revised,based an input received at the October 16th joint session. The major changes that have been made to the ordinance are: 1) The "density bonus" system has been eliminated. 2) GRFA and units in excess of development permitted by - underlying zoning may be requested, but only in the Lionshead/Village area.. Increased development would be restricted to accommodation units and timeshare units. 3) Affordable housing requirements consistent with the recommendations of the proposed Affordable Housing Study have been incorporated into this draft. 4j SDD's may be proposed anywhere in the town. 5) The revised design criteria have been maintained and will provide the basis for evaluating SDD proposals. The following is a section by section summary of the latest SDD proposal. I. MA.7OR GRANGES TO SDD~s 18.40.010 Purx~ose No major changes 18.40.00 Definitions The definition of a "minor amendment'" has been revised to allow staff to approve a slight modification in the amount of GRFA that has been approved in a SDD. 18.40.030 Ao~lications SDD's may now be requested .in any zone district. In order to be consistent.with requirements in the Administration Chapter, f applications will now be required to submit stamped addressed envelopes to be used in the notification of adjacent property owners. 1 r 18.40.040 Development Review Procedures ~ .In addition to minor wording changes., a work session with the planning commission_is now Required before a formal application for a SDD is made. Notification of this work session will be provide to adjacent property owners. I _18.40.050 Submittal Requirements New submittal requirements include a title report, written verification of service from applicable utility companies, a description of employees generated by the development and a statement outlining., the. development objectives achieved by deviations from the property's underlying zone district (if applicable). 18.40.060 Development Plan Development standards, previously located in a different section, have been moved to .this section. The section states that with the exception of GRFA and units, deviations to any development standard (i.e., building height, setbacks, site coverage, floor area, commercial etc.) may be requested by a SDD proposal, Deviations to GRFA and units may be requested in the Resort Development Overlay District (the Village and Lionshead area), and for SDD's dedicated exclusively to affordable housing. 18.40.070 Affordable Housing Requirements This new section establishes two different "levels" of affordable housing requirements: 1) A 15$ requirement for affordable housing will apply to any SDD proposal. 2) An additional 15-30$ requirement for affordable housing wil_1 apply to any SDD requesting development in excess of what is permitted by the project's underlying zoning. Requirements proposed in this section were derived from the Affordable Housing Study. The Council wil_1 be discussing all the recommendations of the Affordable Housing Study on November 20th. 18.40.080 Uses No change X8.40.090 Design Criteria This section requires the Council to find that "deviations from the project's underlying zoning development standards benefit the project, the neighborhood and the community". Further, that the benefits resulting from such deviations would not be possible if the project was developed as per underlying zoning. Revised design criteria address view corridors, sun/shade patterns, open space accessibility, traffic impacts, internal circulation, pedestrian circulation, employee housing, project amenities, town infrastructure, conservation and interim phasing plans. 2 18.40.100 Resort Development Overlay District The bonus criteria have been eliminated from this section. The purpose-of this section into recognize the Village/Lionshead areas as the. locations where GRFA and units over allowable zoning may be-requested. Additional restrictions on such units are also established. 18.40.110 Affordable Housing Density Bonus This section is also based-on recomendations of the Affordable Housing Study. This. section would provide a density bonus for . projects developed exclusively for affordable housing. An increase of up to 25$ may be requested. X8.40.120 Amendment Procedures No changes 18.40.130 Recreation Amenities Tax No changes 18.40.140 Time Requirements No changes 18.40.150 Fees The only change to this section is the use of outside consultants to_review SDD proposals. Currently, the Town Council is required to affirm the Community Development Department's decision to~~ utilize an .outside consultant. This requirement would be deleted. It should be noted that in the event of applicant disputes the need for an outside consultant, an appeal of the staff's decision can be made to the Council. The only real change from this amendment is that a meeting with the Council is avoided if all parties are in agreement with the staff's decision. 18.40.160 Existing Special Development Districts Minor changes recognize the new SDD's-that have been approved since this chapter was last amended. In evaluating this proposal, the key question to ask is how this ordinance differs from the current SDD ordinance. The major improvements made to the existing ordinance are: 1) In-direct response to goals of the Vail Land Use Plan, the SDD ordinance defines where residential density in excess of dens-ity permitted by underlying zoning may be requested, and -also limits the type of residential to short term overnight ~ accommodations. 3 1 2) Affordable housing requirements are established for all SDD proposals. 3) Design criteria used to evaluate SDD proposals have been modified to to provide a more thorough analysis of the benefits and impacts of a proposal. 4) A mechanism is established to allow density increases for projects developed exclusively for affordable housing. 4 ~ ~ ~ - yL i ..d . ~ ~ ~ CORN / _ ~ . ~ 4 , ~ ? « e i ~ R o psrr ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i i ? ~ ~ y e ' ' ' Ip I ? ? C r, ~ ( p ' Y 1 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ L n ' ~ I' p, n ~ W' ' ~ ` fl . ~ t ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~i ,V~ ~ n ? ? I ? RUN 1 ~ ~ , • ~ ? p N I"°' e , 'V691 n M ~ n ~ ' ''..n. ~i ~ V91~E T1hFtUNG p ,F,~1~u'1 / ~ ~ ~ ~yff ~ ~ l~N ~pMStON 0 ~P ? IU ~ r y~ GE n ~ ~e ~ P~ n . * s ~ / s r r p 1r ~ y / ? Distr~~t nt p~erl~y peVelap?~e r~ocnrt CHAPTER 18.40 SPECIAL Dr,v~LOPMENT DISTRICTS (draft-2) Sections: 18.40.010 Purpose (amended) 18.40.020 Definitions (amended) 18.40.030 Application (amended) 18..40.040 Development Review Procedures (amended) 18.40.050 Submittal Requirements (amended) 18.40.060 Development Plan (amended) 18.40.070 Affordable Housing Requirement (new section) 18.40.080 Uses (amended) 18.40.090 Design Criteria (amended) 18.40.100 Resort Development Overlay District (new section) 18.40.110 Affordable Housing Density Bonus (new section) 18.40.120 Amendment Procedures (unchanged) 18.40.130 Recreation Amenities Tax (unchanged) 18.40.140 Time Requirements (unchanged) 18.40.150 Fees (amended) 18.40.160 Existing SDD's (unchanged) 18.40.010 PIIRPOSE The purpose of the special development district is to encourage flexibility and creativity in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design character and quality of new development within the town; to facilitate the adequate and economical provision of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space areas; and to further the overall goals of the community as stated in the Vail Comprehensive Plan. An approved development plan, in conjunction with the standards of the zone district in which the special development district is located, shall establish the requirements for guiding development and uses of property included in the special development district. The elements of the development plan shall be as outlined in Section 18.40.060. 18.40.020 DEFINITIONS A. "Agent or authorized representative" shall mean any individual or association authorized or empowered in writing by the property owner to act on his (her) stead. If any of the property to be included in the special development district is a condominiumized development, the pertinent .condominium association may be considered the agent or authorized representative for the individual unit owners if 1 authorized in conformity with all peY•tinent requirements. of ~t' the condominium association's declarations and all other requirements of the condominium declarations are met. B. "Minor amendment (staff review)" shall mean modifications to building plans, site or landscape plans that do not alter the basic intent and character of the approved special development district and are consistent with the design criteria of this chapter. Minor amendments may include, but not be limited to, variations of not more than five feet to approved setbacks and or building footprints; changes to landscape or site plans that do not adversely impact pedestrian or vehicular circulation throughout the special development district; or changes of not more than 1.5~ to approved gross residential floor areas (GRFA) or 3~ of gross floor area of retail, office, commercial or common areas. C. "Major amendment (PEC and town council review)" shall mean any proposal to change uses, increases gross residential floor area; change the number of number of dwelling or accommodation units; or modify, enlarge or expand any approved special development district: (other than minor amendments as defined in Section 18.9:0.020 B.). D. "Underlying zone district" shall mean the zone district existing on a property, or imposed ors a property at the time a special development district is approved. E. "Affected property' shall mean property within a special development district that, by .virtue of its proximity or relationship to a proposed amendment request to an approved development plan, may be affected by the re-design, density increase, change in use., or other modifications changing the character of an approved special development district. 18.40.030 APPLICATION An application for approval of a special development district may be made for property located in any zone district. An application may be filed by any owner of property to be included in the special development district or hi~~ (her) agent or authorized representative. The application shall be made on a form provided by the Community Development: Department and shall include: 1. A legal description of the property t:o be included in the special development district 2 2. A list of the names and mailing addresses of all affected and adjacent property owners, and prepaid return receipt requested addressed envelopes to each owner, as prescribed in section 18.66.140 B. 3. Written consent of owners of all property to be included in the special development, or their agents or authorized representatives 4. Submittal requirements outlined in Section 18.40.050 5. A development plan as outlined in Section 18.40.060 18.40.040 Dav~LOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDIIRE3 A. Prior to site preparation, building construction, or other improvements to land within a special development district, . there shall be an approved development plan for said district. The approved development plan shall establish requirements regulating development, uses and activity within the special development district. B. Prior to submittal of a formal application for a special development district, the applicant shall participate in a pre-application conference with the community development department. The purpose of the meeting sha12 be to discuss the goals of the proposed special development district, the relationship of the proposal to applicable elements of the town's comprehensive plan, and the review procedures that will be followed for the application. C. The initial public review of a proposed special development district shall be a work session held by the planning and environmental commission. This meeting shall be scheduled by the director .of community development at a regularly scheduled meeting. Notification of this work session shall be provided to adjacent property owners in accordance with the provisions of section 18.66.090. Submittal requirements for the work session shall be as .determined by the director of community development. Following this work session, a formal application for a special development district may be submitted. The planning and environmental commission shall consider the proposal in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and applicable provisions of section 18.66.160. A report of the Community Development Department staff's findings and recommendations shall be made at the initial ` formal hearing before the planning and environmental commission. A report of the. planning and environmental commission stating its findings and recommendations, and the staff report shall then be transmitted to the town council. The town council shall consider the special development 3 district in accordance with the provisions of sections 1 18.66.130 - 18.66.170. NOTE: Sections referenced above reflect amendments proposed to the Administrative Chapter. 18.40.050 SIIBMITTAL REQIIIREMENTS The following information and materials shall be submitted with an application fora special development district. Certain submittal requirements may be waived or modified by the department of :community development if it is demonstrated that the material to be waived or modified is not applicable to SDD Design Criteria (Section 18.40.080), or that other practical solutions have been reached. 1. Application form and filing fee. 2. A written statement describing the project to include infonaation on the nature of the development proposed, proposed uses, proposed densities, contemplated ownership patterns. and phasing plans, and (if applicable) a statement outlining how the proposed development deviates from the development standards prescribed in the zone district in which the proposed special development district is located and what specific development objectives are achieved by such deviations. 3. A survey stamped by a licensed surveyor indicating existing conditions of the property to be included in the special development district, to include the location of improvements, existing contours, natural features, existing vegetation, water courses, and perimeter property lines of the parcel. 4. A title report, including schedule A and B. 5. Plans depicting existing conditions of the parcel (site plan, floor plans, elevations, etc.), if applicable. 6. A complete zoning analysis of existing and proposed development to include a square footage analysis of all proposed uses, number of units and parking spaces. 7. A site plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, all principal site development features, vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, proposed contours and preliminary drainage plans. 4 ~ 8. Preliminary building elevations, sections and floor plans at a scale not smaller than 1/8" = 1', in sufficient detail to determine floor area, circulation, location of uses, and general scale and appearance of the proposed development. 9. A vicinity plan showing existing and proposed improvements in relation to all adjacent properties at a scale not smaller than 1" = 50'. 10. Photo overlays and/or other acceptable visual techniques for demonstrating the visual impact of the proposed development on public and private property in the vicinity of the proposed special development district. 11. Amassing model at a scale sufficient to depict the proposed development in relationship to existing development on the site and on adjacent parcels. 12. A preliminary landscape plan at a scale not smaller than 1" = 20', showing exi-sting landscape features to be retained and removed, proposed landscaping and other site development features such as recreation facilities, paths and trails, plazas, walkways and water features. 13. An environmental impact report in accordance with Chapter 18.56, hereof unless waived by section 18.56.030. 14. A written statement from applicable utility companies verifying their ability to provide service to the site, including a statement describing any adverse impacts on surrounding properties or the community at large that may be anticipated if service is provided to the proposed special development district. 15. A description of the number and classification of seasonal and year around employees generated by the development and a plan describing the method by which ..the applicant will meet the housing needs .generated by the development. The plan shall state specific commitments proposed to meet employee housing requirements as. prescribed in this chapter. 16. Any additional information or material as deemed necessary by the director of the community development department. With the exception of the massing model, four complete copies of 'the above information shall be submitted at the time of application. When a massing model is required, it shall be submitted a minimum of two weeks prior to the first formal review by the planning commission. At the discretion of the director of community development, reduced copies in 8.5" x 11" format of all of the above information and additional copies for distribution to the planning commission and town council may be required. 5 18.40.060 Davr,LOPMENT PLAN An approved development plan is the principal document for guiding the development, uses and activities of a special development district. A development plan. shall be approved by the town council .in conjunction with the review and approval of any special development district. The development plan shall be comprised of the ordinance approved by the town council establishing the special development district and all applicable submittal material`necessary.to establish the parameters with which the special development district shall develop. The development plan may consist of, but not be limited to, the approved site plan, floor plans, building sections and elevations, vicinity plan, parking and circulation plan, open space plan, preliminary landscape plan and a plan outlining how the special development district will comply with all applicable affordable housing requirements. Development standards within a special development district shall be established by an approved development plan. Deviations to lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, building height, site coverage, gross floor area of retail, commercial, office and common areas, open space, landscaping and parking requirements, as prescribed by the zone district in which the special development district is located, may be'r_equested in any special development district proposal. In. addition to the above, deviation to allowable dwelling and accommodation units, and gross residential floor area may be requested in accordance with the provisions of sections 18.40.100 - Resort Development Overlay District and 18.40.110 - Affordable Housing Bonus Section. 18.40.070 AFFORDABLE HOIISING REQIIIREMEN'P The development plan of any special development district approved in accordance with this chapter shall include provisions for providing affordable housing units. The number of affordable housing units required shall be relative to the development proposed and to the anticipated number of employees generated by such development. Affordable housing requirements shall be as follows: A. Affordable housing requirements for any special development district proposal shall be as follows: 1. Affordable housing units equal to 150 of the number of accommodation unit equivalents or dwelling units proposed shall be provided by any special development district. 6 2. Affordable housing units capable of housing 15~ of the employees generated by the retail, office or commercial " square footage proposed shall be provided by any special development district. B.. Affordable housing requirements for any special development district requesting dwelling units, accommodation units, GRFA, or retail, office or commercial square footage in excess of the project's underlying zone district shall be as follows: 1. Affordable housing requirements prescribed in paragraph A above shall be applied to all proposed development that is permitted by the project's underlying zone district. 2. Affordable housing units equal to 15-30$ of the number of accommodation unit equivalents or dwelling units proposed in excess of development permitted by the project's underlying zone district shall be provided. 3. .Affordable housing units capable of housing 15-30% of the employees generated by the retail, office or commercial square footage developed in excess of development permitted by the project's underlying zoning shall be provided. The manner is which the affordable housing requirement is satisfied (i.e. size and type of unit, location of unit, use restrictions on unit, and/or any fee in lieu option), and adopted standards for estimating employees generated per square foot of development and standards for equating number of employees per affordable unit shall be as prescribed in the Vail Affordable Housing Plan and Policies. 18.40.080 IISES Determination of permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be made by the planning and environmental commission and the town council as apart of the formal review of the proposed special development district. Unless further restricted through the review of the proposed special development district, permitted, conditional and accessory uses shall be limited to those permitted, conditional and accessory uses in the zone district in which the special. development district is located. Under certain conditions, commercial uses may be permitted in residential ` special development districts if, in the opinion of the town council such uses are primarily for the service and convenience of the residents of the development and the immediate neighborhood. Such uses, if any, shall be compatible with the residential character of the special development district. The 7 amount of area and type of such uses, if any, shall be .J established by the town council as a part of the approved development plan. 18.40.090 DESIGN CRITERIA \ The following design criteria shall be used as the principal means for evaluating the proposed development plan of a special devel..r~uent district. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that the proposed development plan complies with all applicable design criteria. As prescribed in section 18.40.060, deviai~ions to development standards may be requested by a special development district. Prior to approving any such deviation, the town council shall find that the deviation benefits the desic~n of the project and that such benefits mitigate any potentially adverse impact of such deviation. The design criteria shall provide a framework for evaluating requests for development standards that deviate from the project's underlying zone district. No application for a special development district shall be approved by the town council unless it is found that: 1. Community Plans The development objectives of the project are consistent with community goals and the development plan complies with all applicab:e elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, town policies and urban design plans. The development plan is designed in a way that will not preclude the future development of public improvements identified in community plans, and when necessary to mitigate the impacts of proposed development, such public improvements are included as a part of the proposed development plan. 2. IInderlyinq Zoninq/IIses The uses and activities permitted by the zone district in which the project is located are appropriate for the proposed development and will provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding development and uses. Deviations from the development standards of the zone ` district in which the project is located will benefit the design, the site, the surrounding neighborhood and the community, and such benefits could not be achieved if the property were developed in accordance with the development standards of the underlying zone district. 8 r 3. Project Design Building design with respect to architecture, character, scale and orientation is compatible with the site, adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. Building height, site coverage and overall building bulk are sensitive to the site and to surrounding development and properties. Massing of the proposed development minimizes shadow patterns on adjacent properties and rights-of-way and does not adversely affect prominent public view corridors or views from private property. 4. Site Planning Building locations are designed to produce a functional development responsive to the site, the surrounding neighborhood and uses, and the community as a whole. Proposed setbacks provide an adequate buffer zone between the special development district and adjacent properties and uses. Site planning is sensitive to natural features, maximizes open space provisions and improves the overall aesthetic quality of. the site. 5. Open Space Open space and landscaping are both functional and aesthetic, and are designed to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site. Open space plans maximize opportunities for access and use by the public, and when possible, are integrated with existing open space and recreation areas. Easements, deed restrictions, public dedications and other means as deemed necessary are implemented to assure land remains open and accessible to the public. 6. Parking/Circulation fihe public street system can accommodate increased trip generation resulting-from the new development, or improvements proposed as part of the development plan ~ are sufficient to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development. 9 Internal circulation improvements are designed to 1 .minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts, will accommodate service and delivery functions and will encourage and facilitate the utilization of public transportation facilities. The proposed parking plan is in compliance with the parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52. Pedestrian circulation provides safe, convenient and . aesthetically pleasing walkways throughout the project, and where possible, linkages with existing or planned public and private pedestrian walkways. 7. Geologic Sensitivity Natural and/or geologic hazards have been identified and the development has been designed in response to such hazards, or such hazards that affect the proposed development have been mitigated. 8. Housing Type and variety Residential development within the special development district meets the needs of the. community in terms of variety and housing type as established by community goals and policies. The proposed special development dis~rict complies with all affordable housing requirements as mandated by the Towri of Vail Affordable Housing Plan and Policies. 9. Project Amenities Project amenities such as public art, recreation facilities, convention and meeting rooms and other facilities are designed to provide guest and community services typically associated with resort development. 10. Infrastructure/Town Services Adequate utility capacity is available to serve the development without adversely affecting service levels or existing or future development in the area. The project is designed to assure safe and efficient access and service by the town's fire department and public works department. The design of drainage improvements and utility connections are sensitive to existing natural features and designed in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the site and surrounding areas. 10 ~ 11. Environmental Issues Environmental impacts resulting from the proposal have been identified in the project's environmental impact report and all necessary mitigating measures are implemented as a part of the development plan. The proposed development is designed, built and operated to maximize energy and resource conservation. 12. Project Phasinq Project phasing or .subdivision plans will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. Interim landscape/site improvement plans will be implemented between phases, and the completion of interim improvement plans are guaranteed by a cash bonds, letter of credit or some other assurances acceptable to the town. 18.40.100 RESORT D~vr,LOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT The purpose of the Resort Development Overlay District is to achieve the goals of the ..Vail Comprehensive Plan by encouraging, where appropriate, the development of overnight accommodations and retail activity in the Vail Village and Lionshead areas.. Special development district proposals within the Resort ,Development Overlay District may request development in excess of development penaitted by the zone district in which the special development district is located in accordance with the following provisions: 1. The Resort Development Overlay District shall be as indicated on Appendix A, the Resort Development Overlay Map. 2. Requests shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of section 18.40.040 - Development Review Procedures. Section 18.40.080 - Design Review Criteria shall provide the principal means for evaluating such requests. 3. Residential development approved in accordance with this section shall be limited to accommodation units owned and managed to be available for overnight rental and timeshare units. Said units shall be permanently restricted so as to prohibit conversion to condominium ownership. A declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be filed of record in the office of the Eagle County clerk and recorder, in a manner acceptable to the town attorney, for the benefit of the town to insure that said restrictions run with the land. 11 4. The development of accommodation or timeshare units in 4l accordance with this section shall comply with affordable housing requirements as prescribed in subsection 18.40.070 B. of'~this chapter. 18.40.110 AFFORDABLE HOIISING DENSITY BONII3 The purpose of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus is to achieve the goals of_the Vail Comprehensive Plan by encouraging, where appropriate, the development of affordable housing units throughout the town. Special development districts proposed exclusively for the purpose of developing affordable housing may utilizing.the.Affordable Housing Density :Bonus to request density in excess of that permitted by the zone district in which the special development district is located in accordance with the following provisions: 1. The Affordable Housing Density Bonus may be requested on any property zoned for residential development. 2. Requests shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of section 18.40.040 - Development Review Procedures. Section 18.40.080 - Design Review Criteria shall provide the principal means for evaluating such requests. 3. All units approved in accordance with this section shall be permanently restricted so as ensure their use as affordable housing units. Specific restrictions shall be as outlined in the Vail Affordable Housing Plan and Policies. 4. The maximum bonus that may be requested is a 25~ increase in dwelling units and a 25~ increase in gross residential floor area. 18.40.120 AMENDMENT PROCEDDRE3 A. Minor amendments: Minor modifications outlined in Section 18.40.020 B. may be approved by the department of community development. All minor modifications shall be indicated on a completely revised development plan. Approved modifications shall be noted, signed., dated and filed by the department of community development. Notification of a proposed minor amendment, and a report of staff action of said request, shall be provided to all property owners within or adjacent to the special development district that may be affected by the amendment. Affected properties shall be as determined by the department of community development. Notification shall be postmarked no later than five days following staff action on the 12 a ~ amendment request and shall include a brief statement describing the amendment and the time and date of when the planning and environmental commission will be informed of the staff decision. In all cases, the report to the planning and environmental commission shall be made within twenty days from the date of the staff's decision on the requested amendment. Appeals of staff decisions may be filed by adjacent property owners, owners of property within the special development district, the applicant, planning and environmental . commission members or members of the town council as outlined in Section 18.66.030 A. of the municipal code. B. Major amendments: Requests for major amendments to an approved special development district shall be reviewed in . accordance with the procedures described in Section 18.40.040. Owners of property requesting the amendment, or their agents or authorized representatives, shall sign the application. notification of the proposed amendment shall be made to owners of all property adjacent to the property requesting the proposed amendment, and owners of all property within the special development district that may be affected by the proposed amendment (as determined by the department of community development). Notification procedures for major amendments shall be as outlined in Section 18.66.090 of the municipal code. 18.40.130 RECREATION AMENITIES TA% A recreation amenities tax shall be assessed on all special development districts in accordance with Chapter 3.36 of the Vail Municipal code at a rate to be determined by the planning and environmental commission. This rate shall be based on the rate of the zone district in which the special development district is located, or the rate which most closely resembles the density plan for the district, whichever pis greater. 18.40.140 TIME REQIIIREMENTS A. The developer must begin initial construction of the special development district within three years from the time of its , final approval, and continue diligently toward the completion of the project. If the special development district is to be developed in phases, the developer must begin construction of subsequent phases within one year of the completion of the previous phase. 13 B. If the applicant does not begin and diligently work toward the completion of the special development district or any phase of the special development district within the time limits imposed by the preceding subsection, the approval of said special development district shall be void. The planning and environmental commission and town council shall review the special development district upon submittal of an application to re-establish the special development district following procedures outlined in Section 18.40.040 of this chapter. 18.40.150 FEES Filing fee for special development district applications and requests for major amendments to approved special development districts shall be five hundred dollars. Filing fee for minor amendments to approved special development districts shall be one hundred dollars. Projects deemed by the department of community development to have significant design, land use or other implications on the community may require review by professionals outside of town staff. In this event, the applicant shall reimburse the town for expenses incurred by this review. Any outside consultant selected to review an application for a special development district shall be selected and utilized by the town staff. The department of community development shall determine the amount of money estimated t:o cover the cost of outside consulting services, and this amount shall be provided to the town by the applicant at the time of application Any unused portions of these funds shall be returned to the applicant following the review of the proposed special development district. Expenses incurred by the town in excess of the estimated amount shall be reimbursed to the town by the applicant. 18.40.160 EBISTING SPECIAL D~v~LOPMENT DISTRICTS Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, replace or diminish the requirements, responsibilities, and specifications of special development districts No.'s 2 through 25. The town council specifically finds that said special development districts No.'s 2 through 25 shall remain in full force and effect, and the terms, conditions, and agreements contained therein shall continue to be binding upon the applicants thereof and the Town of Vail. These districts, if not commenced at the f present time, shall comply with Section 18.40.140, time requirements. 14 t To: Planning and Environmental Commission From: ~ Department of Community Development Tom Braun Date: November 12, 1990 RE: A work session on proposed revisions to the "250 Ordinance" Issues surrounding the 250 Ordinance have been raised on a number of occasions during discussions of proposed amendments to gross residential floor area. These discussions have focused on whether the existing ordinance is consistent with the purpose of the ordinance when it was first adopted in 1985. At the October 9th. joint session, an overwhelming number of council members and planning commissioners agreed that the original intent of the 250 Ordinance is good, but in its present form the ordinance is not appropriate. Specifically, the provision that allows for an additional 250 square feet of GRFA when a~n existing unit is totally demolished and then rebuilt was cited as an example of what is wrong with the ordinance. The consensus at this meeting was that the 250 Ordinance should be maintained, provided, however, that "the ordinance is amended to be consistent with the original intent of the 1985 ordinance". The staff has interpreted this to mean eliminating the provision that allows additional square footage on demo/rebuild projects. Background on the Original Proposal Throughout the early 1980's, an increasing number of GRFA variance requests were made for small additions to existing dwellings. While a few of these requests were approved, most were denied by the PEC or by the Council on appeal. The reason for denial was that approval of a variance requires that some physical hardship exist on the site - a physical hardship that creates practical difficulties in the development of the property. It is difficult, if not impossible, to find a - legitimate physical hardship as justification for developing GRFA over what is allowed by zoning. The majority of these variance requests presented no adverse impacts to.the site or adjacent properties. Nonetheless, most ` were denied because they did not satisfy variance criteria. The PEC and. Council's frustration with these requests resulted in direction to the staff to develop a process that would allow for small additions to existing units. 1 r After lengthy analysis and discussion, Ordinance 4 of 1985 was adopted for the purpose of "providing an :inducement for the upgrading of certain structures by permitting the addition of up to 250 square feet of GRFA to certain structures provided certain criteria are met". Among these criteria was a requirement that a residence be at least .five years old before qualifying for additional square footage, thus ensuring that the ordinance is used for additions to existing structures. A provision requiring properties obtaining additional GRFA to comply with minimum site and landscape standards was added to the ordinance. 1988 Revisions to the Ordinance In the late 1980's, it became quite common to see the demolition of existing single family and duplex residences in order to rebuild on a lot. A request to utilize the 250 Ordinance in conjunction this type of redevelopment prompted revisions to the 250 Ordinance in 1988. Referred to as the "ultimate remodel", the purpose section of the ordinance was amended to allow for demo/rebuild projects to qualify for an additional 250 square feet of GRFA. As a "trade- off" for allowing this additional square footage, the ordinance requires all redevelopment to conform to all other zoning standards such as setbacks, height, site coverage, etc. Proposed Amendments to the 250 Ordinance As ironic as it may sound, the simplest solution is to amend the 250 Ordinance back to its pre-1988 wording. A handful of minor amendments made in 1988 would be maintained, however, provisions that allow .additional square footage to demo/rebuild projects would be deleted. As revised, the ordinance could be used for additions to existing buildings only. Justification for deleting the demo/rebuild provision from the code is best understood by considering the original purpose of the 250 Ordinance. The intent of the ordinance was to allow owners of existing dwellings an opportunity to make small additions to their homes. While not stated in the ordinance, the .underlying purpose of the 250 Ordinance was to allow people, particularly the local resident, an opportunity to make their homes a bit more livable. The 1985 version of this ordinance was very successful in allowing for these types of additions. f 2 The Council's direction to staff to draft this original legislation was not prompted by requests to demolish buildings and rebuild them with more square footage than what is allowed by zoning. Rather,~arguments heard in 1985 were "don't hurt the little guy", "provide an incentive to keep local families in Vail - make it possible to build the additional bedroom or enlarge the kitchen". ' The 1988 amendment, allowing for the "ultimate addition", bears no relationship to the original intent of the 250 ordinance. The demo/rebuild provision is a means to add significant value to the. redevelopment potential of property in Vail. In addition, the stated "trade-off" of non-conforming buildings being eliminated is another benefit supporters of this provision cite. In a demo/rebuild situation, the zoning code already requires that nonconforming site development standards be eliminated. This amendment raises the question of when an addition is an addition, and when an addition is a rebuild. For example, would a proposal to demo an entire building with the exception of the foundation be considered a demo/rebuild or an addition? Would a proposal to demo 70$ of a building, then rebuild with the additional 2.50 square feet be consistent with the "original 'intent" of the ordinance? It simply comes down to where you want to draw the line. This revision to the 250 Ordinance should clearly articulate how these types of situations are to be handled. Purpose of this Meetina The staff is in agreement that the 250 Ordinance should be amended back to its original intent - the additional square footage should be used for additions only and riot for demo/rebuild projects. Prior to presenting an amendment proposal at the November 26th meeting, the staff would like to discuss some of the issues involved in this amendment with the PEC. These issues include: 1. First and foremost, do you agree with the staff's assumption that "amending the ordinance back to its original intent" means deleting the 1988 demo/rebuild provision? 2. Eliminating the demo/rebuild provision will require new language defining the circumstances in which the 250 Ordinance can be used. When is an addition an addition and when is an addition a demo/rebuild? For example, would a , proposal to demo an entire building with the exceptio of the foundation be considered a demo/rebuild or an addition? Would a proposal to demo 70~ of a building, then rebuild with the additional 250 square feet be consistent with the "original intent" of the ordinance? 3 . r It simply comes down to where one wants to draw the line. r One option is to limit the use of the ordinance to additions only. An addition means just that, an addition to an existing building. This approach may well be considered very. hard lined,. but it should be understood that this square footage is basically a gift. It is not unreasonable to establish standards for when the square footage can be constructed . A second option is to limit the use of the ordinance to - additions only, with a provision that the demolition of a portion of the existing structure may be permitted. At the :discretion of the staff, up to 25 to 50$ of the structure 'can be demolished if the demolition is necessary to facilitate the development of the 250 square feet. This alternative would allow some latitude to the homeowner while respecting the intent of the original ordinance. 3. The 250 Ordinance has been discussed as a means for encouraging the development of accessory employee units in low density residential neighborhoods. The Affordable Housing Study has proposed that an additional unit be permitted in the single family, two family and primary secondary zone districts, if the una.t is permanently restricted to employee rental. Presently, the "pooling" of the 250 square feet is not permitted on duplex or single family lots. Amending the ordinance to allow the "pooling" of square footage may be one way to encourage the development of these type of units. This would allow for up to 500 square feet to be built under. this ordinance - if it is used to build a permanently restricted employee rental unit. This square footage could also be used up front when a duplex is proposed for a vacant lot. 4 town ofi nail 75 south frontage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2105 November 7, 1990 office of town manager Mr. William James Town Manager Town of Avon P. 0. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Mr. Andy Daly President Beaver Creek Resort P. 0. Box 7 Vail, Colorado 81658 Dear Bill and Andy: The Vail Town Council once again discussed the proposed regional bus service at the Town Council meeting yesterday and reviewed the costs for the Town of Vail providing service to Minturn and Eagle-Vail in relationship to the cost proposed by the joint proposal. The Council's proposal is for the Town of Vail to provide the Minturn service directly. After researching the matter, we foresee the ability to provide the service at a lower cost than indicated by the joint proposal. The Town Council proposes to contribute $55,000 to the Town of Avon for providing service to Eagle-Vail. The $55,000 would include the Town of Vail's contribution to the capitalization fund for this season. This amount is less than was proposed by you, but is more than we estimate it would cost the Town of Vail to provide service directly. The Town Council feels this compromise figure is appropriate. We appreciate the work that your committee has done on this issue and hope to be able to work with you this ski season to provide this important service. Sincerely, Rondall V. Phillips Town Manager RUP/bsc cc: Vail Town Council Larry Brooks Bob McIlveen PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION November 12, 1990 11:30 A work session to review the Town of Vail "Affordable Housing Study." 12:30 Site Visits 2:00 Public Hearing SITE VISITS - 1. Approval of minutes from the October 8, 1990 meeting. - 2. Review of staff decision concerning the parking requirement for the Learning Center Lab to be located in the lower level of the Vail Valley Medical Center Parking. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center 4 3. A request for setback and density variances in order to construct additions to the Christiania Lodge, 356 Hansen Ranch Road; Lot D, Block 2 Vail Village ist Filing. Applicant: Paul R. Johnston 1 4. A request for a front setback variance to allow for a garage on Lot 10, Block 4, Lions Ridge Filing No. 4; 1464 Aspen Grove Lane. Applicant: Carrol P. Orrison 3 5. A request for setback variances, a landscape variance, and an exterior alteration for the Village Center Condominiums, located at 124 Willow Bridge Road, A part of Tract C and Lot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Village Center Condominium Association 2 6. A request for a bed & breakfast conditional use permit at 2754 S. Frontage Road; Lot B, Stephen's Subdivision Applicant: Darlene Schweinsberg - 7. A request to amend section 18.04.130-- definition of Floor area, gross residential (GRFA); 18.09.080 Hillside Residential District density control; 18.10.090 Single Family District density control; 18.12.090 Two Family Residential District density control and; 18.13.080 Primary/Secondary District density control, of the Municipal Code. Applicant: Town of Vail - 8. A request to amend sections 18.04.360-- definition of site coverage; 18.09.090-- Hillside Residential District site coverage; 18.10.110--Single Family District site coverage; 18.12.110--Two Family District site coverage; 18.13.090--Primary Secondary District site coverage; 18.14.110-- Residential Cluster District site coverage; 18.16.110--Low Density Residential District site coverage; 18.18.110--Medium Density Residential site coverage; 18.20.110--High Density Residential District site coverage; 18:22.110--Public Accommodation District site coverage; 18.24.150--•Commercial Core I District site coverage; 18.26.120--Commercial Core II~District site' coverage; 18.27.090-- Commercial Core III site coverage; 18.28.120--Commercial Service Center District site coverage; 18.29.090--Arterial Business District site coverage; 18.30.110--Heavy Service District site coverage; 18.32.110-- Agricultural and Open Spac: District site coverage and; 18.39.X90--Ski Base/Recreation District site coverage, of the Municipal Code. Applicant: Town of Vail FINAL HEARING 9. A request for a work session to review a TABLED UNTIL proposed amendment to Chapter 18.71 of the NOV. 26TH Vail Municipal Code-~-Additional Gross Residential Floor Area (250 Ordinance). Applicant: Town of 'Jail TABLED UNTIL 10. A request for a work session to rezone the NOV. 26TH following property commonly known as the ~ Mountain Bell Site located, to the north of the main Vail I-70 Interchange from Agricultural Open Space to Medium Density Multiple Family. Applicant: Town of 'Vail and Professional Development Corp. TABLED UNTIL il. A request for a work session to rezone the NOV. 26TH following property commonly known as the Pedotto property located to the south of Kinnickinnick Road in the Intermountain Subdivision from Primary/Secondary to Medium Density Multiple Family. Applicant: Juanita I. Pedotto, and Professional Development Corp. TABLED UNTIL 12. A request for a work session to rezone the NOV. 26TH following property located to the north of Safeway and Chamonix Lane in the Vail Heights Subdivision, Lots 5-13 from Primary/Secondary to Medium Density Multiple Family. Applicant: Konrad Oberlohr, John W. and Patricia A. Riclanan for John Witt, Reuben B. Knight, and Professional Development Corp. TABLED UNTIL 13. A request for off-street surface parking on a NOV. 26TH parcel commonly know as the "Holy Cross parcel". Applicant: Vail Associates TABLED UNTIL 14. A request for a height variance to allow for NOV. 26TH the installation of two satellite dish antennas on the roof of the Marriott Mark Resort, Lots 4 and 7, Block 1, Vail/Lionshead Third Filing, Lots C and D Morcus Subdivision, located at 715 W. Lionshead Circle Applicant: Marriott Mark Resort/Tri-County Cablevision TABLED UNTIL 15. A request for a front setback variance in DEC. 10TH order to construct a garage and a wall height variance in order to construct retaining walls in the front setback at 1448 Vail Valley Drive; Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley First Filing. Applicant: John and Barbara Schofield 16. Selection of representative for Transportation Task Force--Next Meeting: November 29, 1990 **Reminder: Eldon Beck/Sherry Dorward Workshop on Streetscape November 27th, 12:00-5:00 with Council and DRB. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA NOVEMBER 7, 1990 3:00 P.M. SITE VISITS 12:00 P.M. 11 1. Vail Athletic Club - New Entry JK , 352 East Meadow Dr./Tract B, Vail Village 1st MOTION: P. Herrington SECOND: G. Lamb VOTE: 3-0 Approved with the following conditions: i). Installation of snow guard on roof of entire building. 2). Relocations of existing aspen which must be removed. 1 2. Mountain Bell Multi-Family Housing JK Metes & bounds legal. Property is generally located north of I-70 and east and west of the Mountain Bell facility. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO NOVEMBER 21ST MEETING. 7 3. Vail Heights Multi-Family Housing JK Lot 5-13, Vail Heights/2199 to 2179 Chamonix Lane and 2187 to 2207 St. Mortiz Way. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO NOVEMBER 21ST MEETING. f 1 18 4. Rimski Remodel - JK 394 Beaver Dam Rd/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village 3rd MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO NOVEMBER 21ST MEETING. 16 5. Byrne Residence - Demo/Rebuild with JK 250 Addition. 16 Vail Rd/Parcel A, a resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 7, Vail Village Filing ~1 MOTION: G. Lamb SECOND: C. Knight VOTE: 3-0-1 Approved with the following conditions: 1) . Existing concrete retaining wall in front of the Hobart residence be painted and capped with same stone as is to be used in siding. 2). That the applicant submit a letter from the adjacent property owner (Hobart) approving the application of stone siding to existing brick and the painting of his residence and approval of painting and stone capping his existing retaining wall. 3). The applicant come back to the board to show that the impact of reducing the front yard walls to 3'-O" will have on the site. Town Engineer Greg Hall must review and approve any proposed water diversion which may need to accrue in order to allow the development to occur. 2 " n 4 3 _ 6. Lot 4, Dauphinais Subdivision - New Single SM Family Residence. Lot 4, Block 2, Dauphinais- ' Moseley Subdivision. SDD #2 MOTION: P. Herrington SECOND: C. Knight VOTE: 3-0-1 Conditions: GRFA must meet zoning requirements DRB directed applicant to provide detailed comprehensive landscape plan for entire project with next submittal. Ned Gwathmey abstained. 4 7. Lot 24, Dauphinais Subdivision - New Single SM Family Residence. Lot 24, Block 2, Dauphinais- Moseley Subdivision. SDD #2 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: WITHDRAWN 15 8. Red Lion - Roof Vent SM 304 Bridge Street MOTION: P. Herrington SECOND: C. Knight VOTE: 3-0 Board determined that the size of the enclosure for proposed vent system was minimized. George Lamb abstained. 3 a 6 9. Vail Village Inn - Unit #3q, 2 new windows MM 100 E. Meadow Dr./Lot 0, Vail Village 1st • MOTION: C. Knight SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Only one window be approved - the window not in the chimney chase. The window in the chimney chase was disapproved. 10. Gateway Plaza - Material cYianges and planter MM modifications. Parts of Lots N & O, Block 5D, Vail Village lst MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: APPLICATION WITHDRAWN 11. Wittemeyer - 250 Addition MM 338 Rockledge Rd/Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 3rd MOTION: G. Lamb SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 3-0 Consent approval. 10 12. H. William Smith - 5th floor addition of 343 MM sq. ft. of GRFA. 141 E. Meadow Drive; Unit F-6, Crossroads Condominiums; I,ot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st • MOTION: G. Lamb SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Approved as submitted. ~ 4 9 13. Scholfleld - 250 Addition AK 1448 Vail Valley Dr/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Village 1st MOTION: G. Lamb SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Approved with condition the if the variance proposal to be heard 12/10/90 by the PEC is not approved, the landscaping plan that proposal will be planted prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the 250 construction. 14 14. Bavarian Bakery Works - Roof Compressor BR 228 Bridge Street/Otto Stork Building MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: WITHDRAWN 13 15. Gorsuch/Superstar Studios - New Window BR 263 Gore Creek Dr/Lot E, Block 5B, Vail Village 1st MOTION: G. Lamb SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Approved. 9 16. Parking Area at 1936 West Gore Creek Drive BR Lot 46, Vail Village West #2. (Conceptual) MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL. 5 _ ~ _ 12 17. Bridge Street Charlie s Color Change BR 304 East Bridge Street/Red Lion Building MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO NOVEMBER 21ST MEETING. 18. Hibben - Storage Addition BR 4800 Meadow Drive/Riverbend Unit #11 MOTION: C. Knight SECOND: P. Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Approved. 2 19. Campbell Residence - Landscape plan 1169 Sandstone Dr/Lot 4, Block 1, Lionsridge #'4 MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO NOVEMBER 21ST MEETING. 20. Schrager - New Single Family Residence SM 4249 Nugget Lane/Lot 8, Bighorn Estates MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL. 6 16 21. Wildflower Inn - New Sign SM 174 East Gore Creek Drive MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED 19 22. Hedrich - New Primary/Secondary SM 2008 Sunburst Dr/Lot 18, Vail Valley 3rd a Resubdivision of a Part of Sunburst MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: CONCEPTUAL. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Connie Knight (PEC) Sherry Dorward Ned Gwathmey Pat Herrington George Lamb STAFF APPROVALS: Dauphinais - Staircase enlarged to generate enough GRFA to expand basement. Lot 1, Lionsridge Subdivision SDD #22 Wittemeyer/Stolzer - Site plan change, move house 18'~ to the south and parallel to the west lot line. Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 3rd 7 Russel Residence - Changes to approved plan. f Lot 15, Block H, Vail Das Schone Dugan Garage - Material change. Lot 5, Block 2, Intermountain Sante Residence Improvements - ReRoof, repaint and pave driveway. Lot 20, Buffer Creek Subdivision 8 . 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWN OF AVON ~1~13~ ~ ~ UPS P02 r.. Town of Avon P. O. Box 97b, Avon. Cd 81!:20 (9091949.4280 November 9, 1940 Ran Ph~.llips Town Manager Town of Vail ' 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colax'~do 81657 Dear Ron: I don't know if Z will be able to make the 2100 p.m. meeting due to a prior p~.~~„itment. I regret the miscommunicat3.ons~, and hopefully you will consider the follawing compromise taub~eat to Andy Daly, Vail Council and Avon Council's final approval). since Vail is willing to spend $90,000, T suggest you contribute that amount in cash to the Tawn of Avon for the Dame ~.evel of service tincludirlg l~iinturn and Eagle Vail) in these equal payments ($30,000 each) cn the following dates, December 1, 1990, February 1, 1991 and Apr~.l 1, 1991. If Andy can accept this compromise, that shauid put everything back the way it was originally proposed. In all fairness to the other entities, I am also requesting a $90,000 a~?sh contribution prom the County (see attached letter). Our goal is still to address transportation an a County-wide basis ovex the next year so that an equitable formula can be developed for al.l entities. 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWN OF AVON P03 , Ron 8hi3~.ips ' proposal page 2 We do appreci~te'Stan's, Steve's Gild youY- help in resolving this matter. si~nc~e~r~ely, ~Qil~.iam D. James Toatri Manager ac: Kent Mueller Jim ~'ritze Andy Daly Avon ~a~n Council . attachaments. Sus schedules filed with l?GC , 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWN OF AVON P04 r•' Town of Avon P. Box 975, Avon, CG 816 (303) 9~9~4280 N~Y~ber 9, 1990 Andy baly,President Beaver Creek Resort P.O. Box 915 Avon, Goloraod 8J.6Z0 Dear Andy: I may not be able to ma3ce the 2:0.0 p.m. meeting today due to a.prior commitmAnt. I would appreciate your support of . a compromise proposal to the To~vn of Vail. • I would suggest that if the Town of Vail is willing to spend $94,000, that we ask them to contribute that amount to the Town Of Avon SO that we Can start the system, possibly • as early as next week. 1 am also sur~gesting that the payments be a:ade in three equal installments, on. pecer•.~ber 1, 1990, February 1991 and April 1, 1991. A~.so, Andy, I believe it is only fair then,~to ask the~County for a similar amount of funding. I would appreciate your support of th~.s proposal if z.am unable to attend the meeting this afternoon. Binaarely, wi.lliam D. James ' Town Manager ' cc : Ron PhiO.lips Rent Mueller Jim Fritze ' Avon Town Council 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWN OF AVON P05 . Town of Avon P. O. Box 978, Avon. CQ $i6a0 (803) 449 November g, 1g40 • ~7im Fritze County Manager Eagle County P.o. BoX 850 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Dean Ji.m: Z have offered to the Town'of Vaii a comp..~.,.ise proposal 1'or this ysar'.s bus system. Basically, ~3exvice inbludes Edwards, aeavar Crack, Avon, Eagle vai.1, Minturn and . Vail.. The Taws of Avon ig prapvsing to ~:un this system • with no addit#.©nal aQncini.strat3ve charges. By eliminiating these charges, $125,000 plus, 5100,000 ~savi~xgs on insurance premimums, the Town of Avon believes it can provide a quality service for next year if funding can be obtained from the County. • I should also ttota that tha Town rias contracted with Zeadville Transit and a stop is planned at Redclif:E. 7: would like to request that the County considez contributing $90,000 to this ($112,40Q oxiginal request) valuable service for next year an8 make three equal insta:Llments ($30,000 cASh) on December Z•r 1990, February 1, 1991 and April 1, 7.991. Triis is the stone proposal made to the Town o£ Vail. . 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWl~ OF AVO~i ppp Jim Fritse proposal PaSe ~ • I xegret that time is of the essence but, the Town needs to know a$ quis~kly as possible the County's dec~.sion. I~opefully you find the proposal acceptab7.e especially given the Cot~tY oontr~.bution of $35fl, 000 last year. with this funding we 'aza csonmai.tted to coatSnue to work w~.th ail pa~rtie$ to find a long term solution, Please let me know when we can meet with you. next week. Sincerely, . . . h*311#.am D. James . IOWA ~rlaIIag®~' cc: Rori phill~.ps . Andy baly Bent Mueller Avon Town Cvtitncil • attachements: Sus schedules filed With PIIC 11-09-90 11:15 AM EROM TOWN OF AVON P07 . A.M. Empioylse• Edwards to 8a~arar Cry Edwrdl TfaIINi /grit i00 10110 EdMrfrde Get ~ i~r t011~ Eiaaur• *rr 70 Mss ttlps~ • 'wwiiai iii TAI i012 itkilM ifi tir~u i6o~oiil:errp fli R ' , r •...d. .e 949.141 ~:n~~ g~a.u Er,ur . , p.~+.•! . i~lavcmbet 1990 54.Q0 font wey ~GMw ~g ~ 'n°!o ~Q . Q(} ! Tra6ir Pink ~T6 r 81S $45.00 - Nbtitfl~l P~ Rtaiurr w~rkrq Ma ett~ lar tr~rnooioidott oeas+a~Cn~eItY1Np~ A.M. Bntployae Edwards/E~t~la Iisl! t0 tail ~ A.M. ~trtployEie Parking ' to Beaar~ Cresi~ T~ rrf ~ T~~ a~a ~ aoo ass eeo >1s 1fIM1 Tiii~s Club+ Qiirar taws' s.ryto. ~e~_ e? :a: ago eoa eoo ~ ~o _ Rapti - 6iT 617 tiP7 d~@ 667 7~Y i lttt ~ _ e,m; 'west lat 62Z 617 611 OJ7? 707. 7YT Tirtira saa ~ 4tJ a,e 70S 7SZR. ~ ,,,~j,a ~ z ~ iii ~eeplt+tt Gttisr liE6 fd0 416 4e0 t y'd4 TOt1 ; - Rk+w (9aMat S07 S6Z 4TJ Bt1 ~ 7a7 73? Fend end ON ~ i00 ~ 6~3 r 7'Oi 7yi ~t,..a,aat~ saa aaa 40D si+i i 7ro ~ ~ ~ ~ IOwi Fiur? asp t7i77 sm 4~ >>z 707 ~ ' t tlon~lte.d tit? ~ sdrl e6~ 7~1 sit YM Ytsaaaorill~ii Cwritr ttiAG 4i6 010 706 760 7SS g ta4 'TrairM r pati~f0 bt bys ia?eranevotulort Id BMiat CinkYlit~.. • 'OgioTets Aron Bw ~ A.~l{. l:mpioyee YalitEapie Mail to Beater Cr+aak A.M. Em~ioyee Avon to Beaver Creek N ~'t • 8andtmattrt>aAerCeurt sao tms s~o 7is ~r ~ t.latnlt.atl !su d07 eq0 ~ 779! 7'17 ~rari c;.nter aau twti sa 7itt v.6t~,a~apotosdat?c+tn~r Sso sta e/0 ~ 70tr 706 w-_,.w `:ter ~ y~ 3a~ Uzi 8attdaitfilt' 100: Qt7 0~ 70i 70;1 7i7 ~ iiau - . Tiitberptrp~ '.ie3s 410 4~ 7'4i 77;1 76E a?9,r~r'ff~ srhia ~ sn• 41. 7W 734 ~ AieQfl ba efsvar S~+9Bk aey 8enrtcs w..l~ aoe apt .ei 7~i rs4 h~ ~a ; MIkIiMi 001 s10 tfi TZI 74i iii gas t "f~L..L rrsr t tioo 1 a0r} i e.~ End d 0~6 tlOY Ot iY 7161 Tsi iu1 ~ ~ t iMrNw 4T0 066 700 7!i 760 itb is ~ ~ . hMwe tai sit a9f 701 79i lit iii I~oevalon sit an • 7F17 727 76Q a7 ~ ~ ~ t~ 'iietr~r io prrurrp bt l~ ~ i~at0at fa Owwr CndsYAlps. '~ranasat e?t/si. Fatarrros and tintteti at pe~apdoriCettri. . ~ tladwd 96~ ~ t®o trd0 7~ aMar sea r..~M~ eatt++.a tt0. ~ -Aiipi. a.. Yai"ftati~pars.OOriCwtwr iii 131Ci ~r ~ 776 tedw tr1 Iii 1SarrCa that iilrt? tpittilR ddo~ Rlaar Rui rla4 ~4 ~ ~4 Rai. ~ r Rio I test 1 ~ Atli 1 eaT, ( R.t37 i A46 VIE.iitar 8t1p6n0 ~4- ~4 ~i- ~4 Req. tt1R/ 1006 11QF/ I tO~tS i tots Faod eM OM ~4. ~4. R1R. RNI. Aev: IiweMlri? >~4 ~4 Ne4 Mr4 ii•9. 'Ttutpai b lh6 ~ RIT01~6ot1 Ceilrr. lY~rydd! CMO.? SM iM4 ~ ti4 76i 1'wtst0rs ieEdrart~ !'t~Yti1.16nAtitt r 6u Ri+tylltari t`sairlar, T."'. p•¢. a1a DAY $EfiYI~'`E 7:55 A.1UI. - 8;00 P.ll+l. I~tNellen c~nur arc ~ ~ ~ ~ PARKING L+DTS: -n~iro,~.~laoi«a~. fecas~ar~ran~s.ri.?a..~vl~. 1a minima ~erdlc~ from p~rkklp r~ b vt8~pe Hart ~ rat ~?u. sc~otuas • rz w~ ~ a tlrwt a M ~ tiadc as ~a~r. ~ bus leaves v®a~ Haq at ttsn nop s tsiiritiios pria? a st. ioAtdur4d ftiia, aaM qi 6~0 p.lit llflta+r 6:00 p.m. bua~ runs every t 5 rnirwte>r b. arir? d~Fir:na. in savpie+o mel~ii t!~ *d tA. ~ ~Iw1: ~ IZ~4 ~$i~ 11-09-90 11:15 AM FROM TOWN OF AVON P08 A.M. MOIWING SERVICE 8t00~A.M:• - 11:•30 A.M. MSD-DAY YAI~ S$[tyICE l1s00 A.M. ~ 3;00 F.M. VILLAGE HALL 8:00 E 10:3D ILLAGE HALL 1100 Z00 RECEPTION CENTER 8 i 08 • ~ 14s 38 ~ CBPTION r~~TBR ~1A8• 208 A90N CENTER 8:12 10:42 VON CENTER 1112 EVERY 222 • LIONSHEAD Z8 nra?~Y ~ 10:38 ONSHk'AD 1228 ~90i~S 2Z8 TRANSPORTATION CNT 8;32 MIhQ;erg II:02 3FORTATIQN CNT ,1132 232 AVON CENTER 8:51 11:21 YON CENTER 1151 251 _ RECEPTION CENTFdt 8: S3 11:23 CEPTION 1I53 g53 UPPER Vw7.LAGE HALL 9:00 I1:3D ( f LLAGE HALL 1200 30Q N].G}iT SERYIGE~~BL~'WP.E1~`l~•:C FIND VAIL~~ P.M. DAY SERVICE 3:00 P.M. - b:30 P.M. • VILLAGE HALL 3:00 ~ 6;00 VILLAGE BALL ban A130 RBGBPTION CENTER 3:08 6:08 rtARNES REQ REQ WL~ST LOT 639 1139 *AVON CENTER gVERY LSONSHEAD 3:28 •20 16:28 KECEPTIpN cNTR 642 ~,v~Y 1I42 MI.~~+~35I t~ AVON CENTER 6G~? 1144 TRANSPORTATION CNT 3:32 1 6:32 30~MIK I.IONSHEAD 658 • TILL 1158 AVON ~.r.a~lrtc 3:51 6:51 • VAIL TITANS ..~raa 703 1203 RECEPTION ~ W 3,sn 4 t 00 7:00 ~ AVON CENTF.Ii 717 1217 *E'ROM 3100 p.m. TO 6:30 p:m. GUSSTS IN AVON NEED TO GO TO THE RECEPTION CENTER RECEPTION CNTR 719 1219 TO CATCH THB VAIL BUS.. WEST LOT 721• 1221 . TARNES REQ REQ A.M. MIhiuaN'TO YAIL P.M. YAYL TO ....~~~..~~1 . MIDDLE 5CHp0I, 615 715 815 ILIONSAEAD 415 51s b15 HWY b LUCEROS 620 720 820 SPORTATION ~ 420 520 620 F.pREST SERVICE 6Z2 722 822 DRUG STOR$ 435 53S 635 DgIIG STARE 6Z5 725 825 FOA,EST SBttVICE 438 538 638 LIONSHEAA 640 ,740 840 6 LUCLttOS kk0 S40 640 TRANSPORTATION CNT 845 745 843 445 54S b43 wS ri r3 90 ld~,ytc ~ ~ J rlx~ PERSONNEL COSTS MAXIMUM HOURLY OVERTIME Captain - $13.21 $19.81 Engineer - 11.14 16.71 Firefighter - 10.04 15.06 TOTAL $34.39 $51.58 divide by 3, gives an average $11.46 $17.19 TOTAL - $11.46 + 17.19 = 28.65 BENEFITS - $28.65 X 1.9.99$ _ $34.35 . RECOI~IIrIENDATION - $35.00/HOiTR r'r:~ S~nr,DIILE COMPARISONS HvunLY RATES AVON SILVERTHORNE VAIL Pumper $475.00 $150.00 (1st out) $150.00 (2nd out) 250.00 Aerial 900.00 400.00 Firefighter 3 0.00 15.00 Officer 40.00 Chief 50.00 Medical 100.00 False Alarm 100.00 11/12/90 Council - FYI Dr. T.R. Busard phoned this morning to voice his opposition to using the proposed property on Kinnickinnick for employee housing. He owns Unit G-1 at the Meadow _ Creek Condominiums. He said when he bought his condo, the idea for the area was to have a park there. He thinks the current zoning, allowing 2 units per acre, is quite enough, and does not want a zoning change. He feels when someone buys property with particular zoning, it is like a contract with the government, and that unless the zoning change is approved by a vote of the people in the area, it is illegal to change the zoning at least morally. He is not against affordable housing, but is against the zoning change. He does not mind if they put affordable housing on the proposed area as long as it remains two units per acre. Dr. T.R. Busard 5050 18th Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34209-5148 (813) 792-4324 /bsc 1 S The 16II TraB - Na~ember 9, 7990 I - - - . Precinct-by-precinct br~eakdow of election a t > ~ > ~ m > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 s. s ~ W f a~ a a~ w ~ • as w as da' r$ > > w a ~w I rRECnvcrs 1 s s a s s 7 8 s . l0 11 1$ is 14 iaA lbs as 17 As>e TOTAL . • U. S. SENATOR Hank Brown, Rep. 24 166 86 196 804 291 139 222 T1 28 19 214 108 198 17S 88 T1 236 161 2,716 dosio Heath, Dem. 48 127 161 172 216 201 2ffi 210 45 12 18 166 68 107 148 60 48 204 82 2,279 Earl F. Dodge, CPH 1 2 8 3 8 4 b 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 91 John Hecl®an, COP 4 7 8 b- 20 18 7 8 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 7 8 82 - REPRrar~v.ATIVET0102ndU.3...+..r~naas Ben Nighthorae Campbell, Dem.eB 188 204 202 868 8ffi 297 921 78 26 22 212 82 189 187 91 72 242 lb6 8,2'!6 Bob Ellis, Rep. 8 _ 107 48 160 146 171 80 115 39 16 .16 168 68 - 99 112 44 44 188 80 1,880 Howeid E. Fields, POP 6 11 4 12 8 10 8 8 8 0 - 2 8 1 1 10 0 1 8 8 lOS GOVERNOR /LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ~ ' . AadrewalBickel, Rep. 8 78 83 114 122 lbl Tl 114 44 20 18 = 91 ~ 4b 89 90 83 42 180 78 1,399 Ramer/Callahan,Dem. 72 210 218 244 898 842 288 314 72 22 ZO 278 118 174 220 102 78 299 147 3,812 AitlcenlFolkerth, L~. 8 10 8 12 7 19 18 30 4 0 .8 S.- 1 8 l0 2 2 8 6 120 Livingswn/High, CPH 1 1 2 1 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 1 0• 0 0 0 0 1 8 17 SECRETARY OF STATE - - ~ _ Aaron Herber, Dem. 66 80 148 82 147 148 143 140 28 9 14 87 _ 32 80 2108 81 36 106 68 1,69b Natalie Meyer, Rep. 16 .187 104 248 842 829 212 •289 77 81 20. 292 324 172 197 88 ' 89 812 164 3,234 Calvin G. Dodge, CPH b 8 2 b 16 18 12 12 7 0 b b 0 0 7 1 0 9 4 119 Gaily Sc~hUoetEtler, Dem. 83 184 178 1b3 278 226 2dl 236 49 - 18 17 188 69 110 168 82 89 209 97 2,b22 ~ DidcSargent,Rep. 11 ISl 66 - 184 '216 281 -122 .174 Bb 26 .20. 178 86 118 145 73 66 204 12$ 2,259 -Karen J. Thiessen, CPH 8 9 10 8 10 18 8- X15 2 1 S 7' 2 4 10 0 0 14 9 120 • ATT.in.vax ~,av~nAl. Dunce Woodward, Dem. 62 108 172 192 229 ' 183 196 204 86 18 1B 142 66 103 129 80 80 168 9b 2,187 Gale Norton 14 172 84 222 27b 808 188 228 78 26 , 2D 211 .99 .128 .181 79 80 268 188 2,798 - BOARD OF EDUCATION Warren E. "Gil" Gilbertson. Rep.12 142 63 188 248 288 L48 188 66 2b 19 186 80 118 161 7b 68 281 107 2,378 Hazel F. T.....__, Dem. 67 103 178 122 191 182 179 187 -31 10 : 17 129 39 82 -129 48 40 143 70 1,938 - REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO Pdcr Diecze, Rep. 8 .L90 47 182 223 290 122 178 bS 18 18 l87 . 86 112 ~ l88 76 60 222 109 2,188 Guy J. Kelley, Rep. 68 92 171 101 182 -188 172 186 84 14 IS '100 38 79 124 41 96 117 Tl 1,768 Elai J. Dodge, CFH 8 17 18 79 19 ffi 16 30 11 1 S 24 7 8 l3 b 7 ffi 18 268 ' - SPATE SENATOR, DLSTRICT N0.8 . Sallyliopper,Rep. l8 188 llb ?A8 861 ~ 860 193 25S 80 27 21 248 11S 169 200 104 78 291 lb7 8,180 Peter Kerney, Dem. 60 89 14b - 118 162.162 172 163 ST 16 18 113 48 BS 118 29 88 140 87 1,776 MEMBER STATE HOUSE OF a.rrnGSENfATIVES, .:.s.,h...l 68 - t Daa Williams, Rep. 48 227 204 821 29 .817 140 206 280 124 102 898 101 2,484 MBMBER SPATE HOUSE OF aarrae.F16NTATiVE3, ...s..~.... b7 ' Dan Arrow, Dem. 18S 166 181 195 32 11 38 786 Scott McInnis, Rep• 862 867 192 250 88 83 ?7 1,959 ~ - - _ COUNTY COMMI3ffiONER, ,,,~.d.LT NO. S George A "Bud" Gates, Dem. 66 140 1Tb 178 310 29b 136 184 82 89 27 198 86 128 - 178 69 78 223 128 2,889 ' - Linda G. Jehneon 18 187 86 l92 228.229 298 249 b7 4 12 164 74 101 L98 64 47 197 104 2,923 ~ COUNTY CLERK AND RE..va,~em - ' 1 dohnnette Phillips, Rep. 60 246 201 824 442 460 802 381 80 40 84 930 141 222 292 123 107 886 212 4,573 COUNTY TREASURER - ~ - Mary E. Walker, Rep. 27 139 11S 176 248 248 1?9 212 63 19 21 l90 - 98 120 _128 86 48 207 122 2,409 Sherry Brandon, UnaR 40 , 137 134 181 288 283 169 180 62 26 20 168 67 106 181 T2 76 216 121 2,489 COUNTY ASSESSOR , ~ CherlynJ.Baker 62 107 148 142 207 297 148 i62 44 S1 26 189 ~ 44 93 182 49 88 177 96 2,064 G.J."Jody" Ceruthere,Rep. 14 114 b9 141 160 141 198 l86 42 8 9 180 83 103 118 61 60 186 9b 1.89b Ramona Pletcher, Umf1: - 12 61 48 T3 176 140 4b 44 36 3 _6 81 ' 21 29 64 91 83 83 34 889 COUNIR...,~.R.~r - - A J. Johnson, Rep. 61 242 220 324.426 430 268 897 100 89 80 832 199 218 279 127 89 893 176 4,218 COUNTY SURVEYOR dim Kunke],Dem. ~ 62 118 169 194 'S68 802 17b 206 69 28 2S 133 41 96 160 bl 66 164 101 2,420 Dan "Corky" Coroo:•an,Rep. 13 182 90 221 188 _201 181 174 68 ' lb 18 21$ 114 128 164 ~82 66 267 117 2,574 ' COUNTY CORONER ~ Donna Meineke 46 263 209 S32 488 464 ~ 269 831 100 9b 88 936 ~ 148 218 286 124 106 899 168 4,318 J COUTY QUESPION T.V. Translator-For 41 142 100 lb9 217 169 68 63 •46 ~ 6 6 163 42 81 14S b7 42 174 86 1,766 ~ -Agaiaa 35 149 164 209 .301 S61 910 378 76 97 SS 219 122 146 131 89 80 272 173 9,307 ' AMENDMENT NO. 1 I For 98 122 110 188 202 237 172 188 67 27 27 181 69 81 lb2 42 68 178 119 2,229 ( No 34 172 142 197 S27 ?80 210 249 66 17 12 214 97 148 171 98 66 273 116 2,876 ` AMENDMENT No. 2 - ~ ' - Yes - 38 192 135 220 282 278 241 264 68 16 29 222 88 160 192 77 67 269 198 2,829 No 29 83 88 116 202 209 lT3 167 b0 29 14 130 6b 76 114 68 69 168 78 1,823 • AMENDMENT NO. S - ~ Yes 38 246 lb2 285 862 949 289 809 78 18 22 297 194 187 248 108 89 S67 172 9,720 No 19 27 66 860 .119 126 80 88 S1 18 12 d9 14 28 64 24 19 BS ffi 890 " AMENDMENT N0.4 - - - f ' Yea 46 182 184 239 284 -27b l98 260 •72 16 . ZS .248 91 142 230 84 6T 288 126 8,006 ' ! No 26 109 86 192 241 238 184 181 'bl ffi 14 130 74 87 82 46 66 176 109 2084 { AMENDMENTNO.b Ycs 46 186 151 268 827 843 280 285 82 87 30 248 126 168 216 93 87 298 163 8,400 l No ?A 107 84 108 206 171 120 ]b4 39 7 11 128 39 78 106 48 33 149 88 1,876 ~ REGL~innau Vwrm PER PRECINCT AND VOTES CAST: ~ - - , Procind N 1- Red C1i1I 174 / 86 Precinct N e -El Jebel -982 / 447 Procind N 2 -West Vail 896 / 298 Precinct N 9 -Sweetwater 262 / 126 Precinct N15A -Awe 1,OS2 / 381 ~ Precinct N 3 - Miaturn 668 / 272 Precinct N 10 - Burce 110 / 44 Precinct #166 -Edwards Awn 869 / 142 ' Prociod.N 4-Edwards 847/ 380 PrecindNll-Bond/McCoy 69/ 42 ~ PrecindNl6-Eagle 229/ 127 f ProcindN 6-Eagle 878/ 643 PrecindNl2-VAiI 1,160/ 378 PrecindNl7-Eagle-Vail 1,0]3/ 4b3 Precinct N 6 -Gypsum 1,013 / 628 Precinct N13 -Vail 478 / 170 Precinct.Abseatee / 266 I Procind # 7 -Basalt 962 / 393 Precinct #14 -East Vail 828 / 244 ' TOTAL: ~ 11,897 / 6,260 - ~ . ~ _ r - - ~ . - - • . -