HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-20 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1990
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Ten Year Employment Award for Larry Pardee
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
3. Housing Task Force Presentation of Town of Uail Affordable Housing Study
4. Vail Resort Association Request for Office Space
5. Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance repealing
and reenacting Section 18.52.160, Parking Exemptions and repealing Section
18.52.180, variances of the Town of Vail Municipal Code and setting forth
the details in regard thereto.
6. Ordinance No. 38, Series of 1990, second reading, annual appropriation
ordinance: adopting a budget and financial plan and making appropriations
to pay the costs, expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado,
for its fiscal year January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1991, and
providing for the levy assessment and collection of town ad valorem
property taxes due for the 1990 tax year and payable in the 1991 fiscal
year.
7. Ordinance No. 40, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance authorizing
the Mayor of the Town of Vail to sign an intergovernmental agreement
creating an Eagle County Emergency Telephone Service Authority within Eagle
County which authority shall include the Town of Vail; authorizing the
imposition of an emergency telephone charge upon telephone exchange access
facilities within Vail; and authorizing service suppliers to collect said
emergency telephone charges.
8.~ Ordinance No. 37, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance amending
section 18.04.130, the definition of floor area, gross residential (GRFA),
Section 18.09.080 density control-hillside residential district; Section
18.10.090 density control-single-family district; Sub-section 18.12.090 (A)
density control-two family residential district; Sub-section 18.13.080 (A)
density control--primary/secondary residential district and setting forth
the details in regard thereto.
9. Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1990, first reading, an ordinance enacting
Section 18.04.365, Definition of Site Coverage in Hillside Residential,
Single Family, Two-Family, and Prirnary Secondary Zone Districts, and
repealing and reenacting Section 18.09.090 Site Coverage-Hillside
Residential District, Section 18.10.110 Site Coverage-Single Family
District, Section 18.12.110 Site Coverage-Two Family District, Section
18.13.090 Site Coverage-Primary/Secondary District; and setting forth
details in regard thereto.
10. Resolution No. 24, Series of 1990, a resolution determining that the
formation of a Local Improvement District having the boundaries indicated
on Exhibit A as prescribed in the Colorado Underground Conversion of
Utilities Act (29-8-101 C.R.S) will promote the public convenience,
necessity, and welfare.
11. Appeal of Design Review Board approval of the Byrne residence, a
demo-rebuild project that incorporates the 250 square foot addition,
located at 16 Forest Road, Parcel A, a resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 7,
Vail Village 1st Filing
12. Adjournment
I
o ~ ~
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1990
7:30 p.m.
EXPANDED AGENDA
7:30 1. Ten Year Employment Award for Larry Pardee
7:35 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
7:40 3. Housing Task Force Presentation of Town of Vail Affordable
Kristan Pritz Housing Study
8:40 4. VRA Request for Office Space
Rob Levine
Background/Rationale: The URA Board wants to request
directly from the Council consideration for condominium fee
waiver and possible other requests.
8:55 5. Ordinance No. 36, Series of 1990, second reading, an
Kristan Pritz ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.52.160,
Tom Braun Parking Exemptions and repealing Section 18.52.130,
variances of the Town of Vail Municipal Code and setting
forth the details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify amendments
proposed to the pay-in-lieu parking program in Ordinance No.
36, Series of 1990, on second reading.
Background Rationale: These amendments establish specific
conditions under which the parking program may be utilized.
The PEC voted 6-0 to approve this ordinance.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 36, Series of
1990, on second reading.
9:15 6. Ordinance No. 38, Series of 1990, second reading, annual
Steve Barwick appropriation ordinance: adopting a budget and financial
Ron Phillips plan and making appropriations to pay the costs, expenses,
and liabilities of the Town of Vail, Colorado, for its
fiscal year January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1991, and
providing for the levy assessment and collection of town ad
valorem property taxes due for the 1990 tax year and payable
in the 1991 fiscal year.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 38,
Series of 1990, on second reading.
Background Rationale: This ordinance adopts a budget and
financial plan and makes appropriations to pay the costs,
expenses, and liabilities of the Town of Vail for its 1991
fiscal year. Per State statutes, the Town's use of Highway
Users Taxes and lease/purchase financing plans will be
discussed.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 38, Series of
1990, on second reading.
9:35 7. Ordinance No. 40, Series of 1990, second reading,
Ken Hughey authorizing Town of Uail participation in the Eagle County
Emergency Telephone Service System
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 40,
Series of 1990, on second reading.
Background Rationale: In order to get an E-9-1-1 system
established in Eagle County and to ensure Town of Vail
J `
participation, we must pass an ordinance allowing 1) the
Mayor to sign an intergovernmental agreement; 2) authoriz ing
an emergency telephone surcharge; and 3) authorizing service
suppliers to collect the surcharge.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 40, Series of
1990, on second reading.
9:45 8. Ordinance No. 37, Series of 1990, first reading, an
Kristan Pritz ordinance amending section 18.04.130, the definition of
Tom Braun floor area, gross residential (GRFA), Section 18.09.080
density control-hillside residential district`; Section
18.10.090 density control-single-family district;
Sub-section 18.12.090 (A) density control-two family
residential district; Sub-section 18.13.080 (A) density
control--primary/secondary residential district and setting
forth the details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 37,
Series of 1990, on first reading.
Background Rationale: This ordinance reflects changes that
were agreed to in concept at a PEC/Council joint session in
September. The PEC recommended approval of these amendments
by a 7-0 vote.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 37, Series of
1990, on first reading.
10:15 9. Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1990, first reading, an
Kristan Pritz ordinance enacting Section 18.04.365, Definition of Site
Tom Braun Coverage in Hillside Residential, Single Family, Two-Family,
and Primary Secondary Zone Districts, and repealing and
reenacting Section 18.09.090 Site Coverage-Hillside
Residential District, Section 18.10.110 Site Coverage-Single
Family District, Section 18.12.110 Site Coverage-Two Family
District, Section 18.13.090 Site Coverage-Primary/Secondary
District; and setting forth details in regard thereto.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Ordinance No. 41,
Series of 1990, on first reading.
Background Rationale: The proposed amendments will change
the way site coverage is calculated on single family and
duplex developments by "closing loopholes." The PEC
recommended unanimously to approve this ordinance.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 41, Series of
1990, on first reading.
10:45 10. Resolution No. 24, Series of 1990, a resolution determining
Larry Eskwith that the formation of a Local Improvement District having
the boundaries indicated on Exhibit A as prescribed in the
Colorado Underground Conversion of Utilities Act (29-8-101
C.R.S) will promote the public convenience, necessity, and
welfare.
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny Resolution No.
24, Series of 1990.
Background Rationale: Property residents in East Vail have
requested that the Town form a Local Improvement District
for the purpose of converting overhead utilities in their
neighborhood underground. This resolution is the first step
in the formation of a Local Improvement District although in
and of itself it does not form the District at this time.
It is the first step as required by State statute.
11:00 11. Appeal of Design Review Board Approval of the Byrne
Kristan Pritz Residence, a demo-rebuild project that incorporates the 250
square foot addition, located at 16 Forest Road, Parcel A, a
resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing
-2-
Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify ORB
approval of the project.
Background/Rationale: The DRB approved the project 3-0-1.
The motion was made by George Lamb and seconded by Connie
Knight. Ned Gwathmey abstained from the vote. The approval
included the following conditions:
1) Existing concrete retaining wall in front of the Hobart
residence be painted and capped with same stone as is
to be used in siding.
2) That the applicant submit a Lett"er from the adjacent
property owner (Hobart) approving the application of
stone siding to existing brick and the painting of his
residence and approval of painting and stone capping
his existing retaining wall.
3) The applicant come back to the board to show that the
impact of reducing the front yard walls to 3'-0" will
have on the site.
4) Town Engineer Greg Hall must review and approve any
proposed water diversion needed in order to allow the
development to occur.
12:00 12. Adjournment
-3-
TOWN OF VAIL ArrORDABLE
HOUSING STUDY
FINAL REPORT
NOVEMBER 20,1990
S09ALL ik7`Oi[Hd G?tfiS
TOWN COUNCIL
Kent B. Rose, Mayor
Thomas I.5teinberg, Mayor Pro Tem
Lynn A. Fritzlen
Jim j. Gibson
Merv Lapin
Robert M. Levine
Margaret (Peggy) A. Osterfoss
TOWN MANAGER
Rondall V. Phillips, Town Maziager
HOUSING TASK FORCE
Diana Donovan
Lynn A. Fritzlen
Joe Macy
Jerry Oliver
Margaret (Peggy) A. Osterfass
Kathy Wa..~~..
Dalton Williams '
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF
Kristan Pritz, Director
Jill Kammerer, Senior Planner
Mike Mollica, Senior Planner
CONSULTANTS
Nolan L. Rosall, AICP
C. Christian Cares, AICP
Rosall Remmen Cares, Inc:.
• TABLE OF CONTENT5 •
I-INTRODUCT'ION 1
A -EAGLE COUNTY HOUSING Nr.rua A~F~MENT 1
1 -OVERVIEW OF SIZJDY 1
2 -KEY FINDINGS FROM THE EAGLE COUNTY HovsING Ncrro
A~ESSMENT 3
3 -RESULTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEY TIIAT DESCRIBE VAIL 4
B -TOWN OF VAIL ArtvxDABLE HOUSING STUDY FOCUS GROUPS 7
i -EMPLOYERS Focus GROUP 7
2 - DEVELvrCnS. AND ARCHITECTS FOCUS GROUP 9 .
3 -EMPLOYEES FOCUS GROUP 10
C -HOUSING PROGRAMS BEING USID IN OTF~R COMMUI~I l ~ r_, 11
D - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING
STUDY 14
1 - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS 15
2 - PHASE II RECOMIyIENDATTONS . 15
3 -EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS 16
II - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS 17
A - PROVbSION FOR A~ • ~~,ORY UNTf IN SIIVGLE-FAMILY, PRIMARY/SECONDARY
AND DUPLEX ZONE DISTRICTS 17
B -NEW DEFIATTITONS FOR PERMANENTLY Lr.~u~-Rr~iicl~.ic~r Arr~nuASLE
HOUSING AND STUDIO HOUSING UNITS 17
C -ROLE OF TOWN OF VAIL 20
1-CREATION OF A TOWN OF VAIL HOUSING AUTHORITY 20
2 -TOWN OF VAIL HOUSING FOR EMPLAYEES 23
3 -PUBLIC/PRIVATE ArrvnuABLE HOUSING PROTECT 23
4 - A FOCUS FOR HOU$TNG POLICIES AND ISSi7ES AT DirrrrcENT
. .GOVERNMENTAL LEVELS 24
Pis 1
• TABLE OF CoNTEM5
D -SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (SDD) FoR AFFORDABLE HOUSING 24
E -SPECIAL DEVELAPMENT i nn.. i~ FOR COMMERCIAL, MDCED-USE,
OR FREE MARxET LODGE RooMS To
PitOVIDfi FoR Arr~iu.IABLE HOUSING 26
F -WAVER OF FEES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSIIVG UNTTS~, A~ • ~--~uRY
UNITS, AND STUDIO HOUSING UNITS 28
III - PHASE II RECOr~IlViTNDATIONS 29
A - NEw COMMERCrAL AND Rm,LENTTAL DEVELAPMEIVT AFFORDABLE Hovstrrc
REQUTItEMENT 29
B - Arn~nDABLH HOUSING UNITS AVAILABLE "FOR PUF:CHASE"
BY YEAR-RotJNia Loc~?L RESIDENrs 29
C - ONGOnvG REVENUE SOURCES 29
Pnce n
• a
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
I - IN i xODU1,. t tON - •
In January of this year, the Town of Vail, as represented by the Town Coundl and the Planning and
- Bnvironmental Comatission (PEC), requester) that staff, assisted by the consulting firm of Rosall
Remmen Cares (RRC), provide guidance and direction by developing'a series of polides and
. - recommendations to address the community's need for expanding the supply of affordable housing for
its local residents, both year-round and seasonal
This . ~a,lest followed a series of joint study sessions with the Council and the PEC, at which the
general nature of the housing problem was discussed, along with related. issues of maintaining
neighborhood integrity and "quality of life," the availability of community services and capadty of
infrastrucEure, retaining ",...pliance with the Land Use Plan,, and considering the needs for affordable
-housing as regional, not just a local or Town of Vail issue. A housing task f,,.~~t consisting of memL:.s
of both the Council and the PEC as well.,as: community members at large was established to oversee the .
effort and to bring a report back to the respective bodies which would help to define the magnitude of
- ~ the problem and suggest a desired course of action
This report summarizes the information obtained from three primary sources. It is based on a
_ ~ combination of data developed;from the County-wide Housing: Needs Assessment, input received f..,ui
focus t,.~..sp sessions, and an evaluation of programs and solutions that are being tried elsewhere. The
staff and consuItanf, in concert with the Housing Task Force volunteers, developed a preliminary set of
recommendations and alten;~ative actions for consideration. These reca::,...endations are customized to
the current situation and reflect the belief that multiple actions rather than one single program will be
fired to address local needs. •
A -EAGLE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
1 -OVERVIEW OF STUDY •
Concurrent with the request outlined above, RRC was also selected by Eagle County to develop a
housing needs assessment study with the intent of documenting and quantifying the affordable housing
needs for the overall County: Within the context of that overall analysis, RRC was asked to develop a
preliminary estimate of need for such housing for the Town of Vail.
The approach used for this effort was a combination of survey research based on a random sample of
fiagle County ,;,._.rloyees and employers, which provided a statistically valid basis for estimation,
together with a series of "focus interviews sessions" held with a selection of local public and private
employers, employees, planners, architects and developers, interested citizens, and local residents who
might be impacted by the tight housing market, in order to offer a qualitative dimension to the analysis.
VYhile the full report of the Eagle County Affordable Housing Needs Assessment is available under
separate cover fi.,m the Department of Community Development, it is helpful to summarize some major
findings iz~~ the study.
The. issue of affordable housing for resort employees is not new in Eagle County. Periodically, over the .
past two decades, the problem has emerged and :has been addressed in various ways, only to diminish
in time as new building cycles resulted in a surplus of units relative to demand that temporarily served
PAGE 1
J
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
workers' needs until they were "absorbed" into the marketplace. The annual cycle of winter peak
- occupandes, followed by slack summers, helped to further reduce the perceptions and extent of the
`problem.. Fuially,'there were the workers themselves., With a large component of seasonal workers
residing in Eagle County for six months or less; many of whom -were th the region for a single season
with no intention of staying longer, there was a willingness to sacrifice quality of housing to simply be
in a resort setting and be a part of the "action"
Gradually, many of these market forces changed and pressures nnounted until, during the 1989/90 ski
_ season, Ehere came a new and.greater awareness that_affordabie lhousing had again emerged as an
important.issue. The decision was made to study the local situal3on through a "housing needs
assessment." The 1990 study concluded that tliere is:a widely-held perception that a "problem" now
truly does exist, with both ~.:..~rloyees and ~...~Ioyers calling for attention to the problem and for action-
oriented solutions.
The study also concluded that the problem in 1990 is the result of several diff~r,..t factors. Some may
be cyclical but others are not, at least in the short-term. These :cziuses of the Eagle County problem
should be understood from the outset. To a certain extent, they help to develop the context for
understanding, and evaluating, both the problem and the appropriate range of solutions. The causes of
the housing sh.,. tage in Eagle County include:
• The demographic.changes.occurring nationally, particularly as part of the age structure of
- "the population, which is :resulting, in the decreasing supply of workers in the 18 to 24
year old range that has historically keen the source `of a significant component of the sld
industry labor force. By 1995 there will be apr..,..~.mately 5 million less persons aged 15
to 24 than in 1980. .
• With decreasing supply has come reliance on older workers. These workers have
different demands and aspirations for housing anti living conditions than their younger
counterparts.
• Imr.~., red su......er tourist activity has, further exacerbated the problem. There are needs
and opportunities for ayear--round work force, wiith corresponding declines in seasonal
labor that leaves the County for the summer months.
• Improved market conditions in the resorts have resulted in increased demand for lodge-
.type units for the visitor. Instead of meeting this need entirely by new construction,
long-fu... housing l~s bcen converted to short-term, and rent in...r.~ses for the reduced
inventory of available local resident housing have occurred.
• The strength of the market has resulted in increased construction activity. Construction ,
workers place added and special demands on the housing stock.
• Changes in the tax laws in 1986 changed the dynamics of second-home and investment
real estate, further constricting the supply.
PAGfi 2
' TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING S1VDY 1990
The survey results allow Eagle County to .be compared to several other counties where skiing is a
dominant economic force. By at least one measure, Eagle County's problem is more severe than that
found in other Colorado counties, including Routt, Sununu and. San Miguel. Housing is considered to
be a major probleat by a majority of respondents in Eagle County, with about 39 percent calling it
`'critical" compared to between 20 and 30 percent calling it critical in the other ski counties where similar
research was perf......ed.
As local leaders, including Vail r~.r. ~sentatives, -address the issue of affordable employee housing, it is
. ~ important to consider not only the needs of workers, but also the competitive implications of having a
'satisfied and, relatively available work force to serve resort guests. In a service driven economy, where
quality of experience is ofparamount concern, there is, a need to have adequate and affordable housing
to ensure that the work force is both available and generally satisfied. Resort ~.,...munities that are
attentive to this issue niay well achieve success; other ",..,munities that cannot draw quality workers
niay suffer .competitively m the demographic "squeeze" which will be experienced f.,,:.. the early 1990's
and on. for'several years to come.
2 -KEY FINDINGS FROM THE EAGLE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
The study was designed to collect inf.,....ation that would serve. a variety of users. Its primary purpose
was to quantify the housing needs.in Eagle County. Secondarily, it was also intended to systematically
gather current local data that had generally not been available: - A number of topics are addressed in the
full report, but several key findings were obtained that should be of general interest. These include:
• The overall local population has aged since 1984 when a similar study was done. The
population is more often married, and has become less transient. The desire to stay in
the region "indefinitely" is up, resulting in different housing needs and aspirations.
• _ Seasonal workers, those who are only in Eagle County for a part of the year, appear to be
in decline (although there is little doubt that surveys undue
represent this component of
the local. work force). However, seasonal work schedules are ~ t,~.iently indicated by the
respondents. Irregular work habits are common, and there is a tendency for a significant
segment, of the winter population (over 30 percent) to hold multiple jobs; these are two
very significant forces Totally that have implications for housing, including desired
locations and the ability to .qualify..for home financing; regional transportation; child care;
and a variety of other aspects of local life. While poorly and incompletely understood in
the past, these attributes of mountain living call for careful consideration and suggest that
new definitions _ and measurement techniques are needed if workers in tourism
based
economies are to get fair treatment in qualifying for loans and/or housing subsidy
monies.
• In a related finding, the percent of the renter population paying over 30 p~...~..t of
household income for' housing is high - in excess of 35 percent of all employees. While
this group is in "need" when pleasured by traditional f,,.....ilas, there is evidence to
support the conclusion that`paying relatively more for housing is a fact of resort living.
For ~y mountain dwellers including Vail Valley residents, other household expenses
including recreation and entertainment may be less than in traditional c„~.......uuties.
Again, new measures and defuutions may need to evolve to adequately .~.r.~c.~ent the
resort situation.
PAGfi 3
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990 '
The conclusion from the, analysis. is that the current and near-tenor expected need for housing units in
Eagle County is between 3,000 and 3,800 persons requiring some level of financial assistance if
traditional measures of proportion of income paid for rent are used.
Clearly, programs cannot be developed to address all of the measured or perceived "needs" of residents
.that are cu..~~.tly housed, but some attention should be given. to the difficulties experienced by this
~,..,~ap. The figure,showing over 3,000;persons..in this situation provided one basic measure of the
"order of magnitude" of the pmblem;'.In' addition, there is a nee~~ for approximately 800 new units.over
the next two ye~azs, if the e5timate~ of units demanded through various aleasures of need are quantified.
The measures used in the study include: (1) the p.~~r.,~on of people who.are paying more than 30
percent of their income for rent or indicated major difficulty in f[nding suitable housing; (2) individuals
-who either ~+iere .offered but did not accept a job or were turned.away ~.,u. a job due to lack of
_available housing; (3) jobs which went unfilled withfn.the counfi~ in 1989/90; and (4) and new jobs
projected to be added to the work force as~ a result of regional growth. When these measures are
totalled, the result is the app.,..imate 800 unit figure for the County as a whole.
3 -RESULTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEY THAT DESCRIBE VAIL
As shown on the fallowing page, the survey permits the compa~ason of Town of Vail working residents
with residents of the entire region. The survey re5utts indicate that Vail residents are:
Vail residents are:
• More often seasonal residents of the area (19 percent rnmpared to 6 percent overall)
• Younger (many in the 20-29 age group)
• Single (56 vs. 26 percent)
• Slightly lower income
• Fewer children ("no children" = 90 percent vs. 67 percent overall)
• 'Newer" residents (more of six months or less)
• Different in teams of type of residence: apartments or condos are the residences of 61
percent of Vail residents vs. 29 percent overall; mobile home - 0 vs. 21 percent; single-
family homes -10 vs. 27 percent
• More households rent in Vail (76 vs. 53 pt...~:..t)
• High intent to remain in area .
• Slightly lower satisfaction with current housing C~0 vs. 76 p~~r...t)
More preference to rent expressed (35 vs. 16 percent)
PAGfi 4
• TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
A COMPARLSON OF VAIL RESIDENTS TO ALL COUNTY RESIDENTS '
(T~ OVERALL)
' • Note: G,.,;,,.,i'ea may not tota1100% due to pardal ategodea, .
Male ~ :onaditrg o~ multiple ,r aea.
1595 47~ SS'96 53 '
GE: Undo 20 20.29 30-34 3544 1I45-54 55-64 ~
19b 1~ ~ 36 1245 l9 2395 2994 ?95 119 I9fo 39~ 19b
AL S
~ Monied ~ liveTogthr Separated Diyoroed Widowed
OUSEHOI.D d73M S,S15M SIS•S20M S20-S30M S30S45M 545~6pM ~360M
M£ 3rb S 3396 29
IAN HSHLD ~ VG. MO. AVG. MO. AVG. MO.
TS REN HS1iT~S.W/
HLD: 2.~J Z HLD: OJ3 0.56 NO CI~.DN: 67
>DENC8IS: Seasonal Piamsoeot TiI~ IN ~ !Mos. 3.6 Mos. 1-3 Ycs. Over 3 Yn.
J995 10 4195 9p REGiON: 396 3 /8~b 11 1796 14 SI95 62
Vail ~ e/Va8 Amow/Wild Edwards Eagle G„~..,,.~ Mm0aa
OUSINGIN: ~ 26 13_ 14 13 7 4 S
IDENCB .F.Houae lea ~ Apt/Condo MobileHm Dorm. Roan Otba
/ s
YOU Osvrr. Rent RutRm ~ Caretate Other
. _ 'E~
_ 'PO SPAY d lNo Mo 6-12 Mo I-3:Yr 3-10 Yr >IO Yr DaotKocsv
RE(3I(~AI: 2~ ~ 3 I'b 3 llrb 1 R96 1
USIIdG
AU)~'. 15 1,.¢9L 45 T
4~1~ h
TLS~ACTION VerySat Sat Dissat VeryDis
IOgr 24 Sl>96 51 2595 S96 S
YOIJ Own. Rent Lease
-Eb~i.HSG R~ Ndther Uacertaie r
OUSWGTYPE F.Hwse ~ ApdC.ondo MobikHm Dam. Cabin Other
OUSING I.CIN Vail ail Atrow/Wild Edwards Eagle IGylrswn Mmpan
CHOICE: ~t195 35 395 295 9 595 I1 295 9 4 i '
HOUSEHOID INCOME _ 1ST. CHOICE -TYPE
sss
aos
~i oa
ass _
s a
- ~ t'rsitst4 "
~ w.err~t.°°~ orr O1r r
IIV(,'O11'!B PRrie~aFlVCE
~ ovnws ~ oavataaw t~ oveurl. a>, aoa~mianr
N= 157 VA2
N= 560 OVERALL
EAGLE COUNTY EIuII'LOYEE PROFILE, APRIL 1990 .
Source: Rosall Rema?en Cases, Inc.
PAGE 5
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STWY 1990. '
• Greater willingness of employees. to live in designated employee housing (with a higher
desire to rent such housing: 38 percent in Vail vs. 23 percent overall; than to purchase -
10 percent m Vail vs. 16 percent overall).
• Vast residents imlicate some sense of "r~lism." They recognize that housing in the Town
. is likely to be a rented aparfntent rather than a detached single-family home. Vail
residents indicate their preferred. housing, type is apartment/condo - 20 vs. 9 r t...,~.t;
triplex/townhouse -13 ~s. 6' percent; single-tamil}? - 52 vs. 73 percent.
• Location preference: Those th Vail prefer to live in Vail as a "first" choice housing
location - 81 percent. The respondents from outside Vail who prefer Vail is 18 percent.
• Seasonal workers, renters and households without children all prefer Vail relative to any
other location.
• Rela#ed to the type of households which prefer Vail, a greater proportion 57 percent -
would prefer a unit of two bedrooms or less.
• Overall, number of cars per household of persons living m Vail is slightly less than in the
County, with an average of 1.93 in Vail compared to 2.13 in the overall County. In Vail,
averages by size of unit are:
Efficiency or studio .875 cars
One-bedroom 1.40
Two-bedroom 1.67
Three-bedroom 2.38
Four-bedroom 3.5
• Average amount paid for housing in Vail is greater than in the overall County, with an
average monthly rent or mortgage. of $677 and expenses of $167, or a combined total of
$844. Average amount paid per bedroom is $416, compared to $319 overall.
The County survey allowed conditions in the Town of Vail to be quantified. Within the Town of Vail
itself, we estimate, conservatively, that approximately 40 to .50 percent of the County-wide estimate of
need should be accommodated based on the Town's population and number of jobs located within Vail.
While estimates_of z...rloyment_ vary f.~.:.., source to_source, it ~ projected that a total of approximately
_16,000 jobs.exist in Eagle County.. Within.Vail are located an estimated 7,000 jobs, or about 44 ru.ent
of~the County total. The.data translate to approximately 1,200 to.1,800 persons who are paying more
than they can realistically afford for housing and are in need of some. type of financial assistance or
subsidy, based upon cw.~...t levels of salary and rents. Thus, given current market conditions,
arr~.~.3mately that number of local residents.are in need of rent supplement, publicly assisted housing, '
or other types of programs which would .reduce the monthly housing costs which they must bear as a
result of the existing tight housing situation . m addition, based on the survey data, we estimate the
need for approximately 350 to 400 new designated a#fon3able housing units within the Town over the
next few years. .
PAGE 6
' TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSWG STUDY 1990
The data allow further descriptions of the new units demanded in the Town of Vail, and the following
observations may also be made based upon the survey data collected:
• .There should be a mix of rental and owner-occupied units, with the greatest
proportionate need in the rental unit category.
• Rental.units may be of various housing types. While the. majority of people, given their
choice, would,~.prefer single,family type housing,. townhouse and condominium styles are
. the most popular feasible choices;' Very lialited demand exists for traditional dormitory-
style housing, which would dearly serve only as a housing choice of "last resort" for most
people, even seasonal residents.
• .Housing quality is deSned by many factors, with adequate parking (almost one space per
occupant), privacy within the unit and sound insulation between units, kitchen and
Laundry facilities on-site, adequate storage, and access to a yard or deck being considered
as most critical to lie incorporated within any residential development.
• While it is desirable from a community planning standpoint to emphasize family housing
within the Town'of Vail,,. there is a greater than average desire on the part of singles and
seasonal workers to live in the Town, loser to their jobs, skiing facilities, and "the action."
There is a corresponding desire of many of the "families" to escape the noise, density, and
congestion of the Town in `search of less ~:..r~..sive, lower density, and quieter
accommodations in down-valley- locations. This desired pref~,.~u.ce should be reflected in
the design and distribution of proposed housing types within the Town.
B -TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY FOCUS GROUPS
In addition to the survey data that was collected County-wide, a series of focus groups were conducted
with various representatives of the local community. A number of individuals attended group sessions
. that were conducted iii two "waves." The first series of three groups explored local conditions and a
number of issue's related to the affordable housing probleal. The second series of four groups,
conducted with generally the same participants lSut with the addition~of "t...~loyees" built on the earlier
sessions; but also examined the range of potential solutions.
Results b.,~... the several focus group discussions expanded upon, and also confirmed the above-
described survey findings.
1-EMPLOYERS Focus GROttP
Two focus group sessions were held with a representative sample of ,~..rloyers located within the Town
of Vail These sessions indicated the following:
• There is a critical need for expanded affordable housing opportunities within the Town of
Vail as well as within Eagle County.
PAGH 7
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING S'IZJDY 1990
• The most critical need is t~ find housing for sea;?ona1 workers and renters, although
families and households s~. .:ing ownership opportunities are also in need.
• Most of the employers find, that up;to 20 percent of their jobs remain unfilled, which is
attributed in large measure; to the Lack of affordable housing opportunities. This means
..that reduced levels.of service below that desired often result. Employers often are fa..td
to be' less "choosy" about :who they ,hire; seeking anyone who has ~.....mitted housing
available, :and- are also reluctant to fue anyone; a:; it is so diffictilt to find a replacement.
Tl?erefore, quality.~ontrol of the work force suffers, and ,~.,,~rloyers are forced to tolerate
performance which `would otherwise not be' acceptable.
• _ . Sh.~.l«ge of staff is not limited to service and "non-professional" occupations. The
hospital, banks, school district, etc., have difficulty attracting nurses, middle management,
and professional positions, as well.
Most employers believe that the scarce housing situation in Vail will not correct itself.
They believe that concerted action is needed, with the Town's involvement, at least to
some extent, being apre-requisite to sowing the problem.
~ Disagreement does exist over the extent of public involvement necessary. Strong
consensus exists over.the.need for the Town to provide incentives and opportunities for
the private sector to r.,?.~ide such housing through amendments to its zoning regulations .
to pc:....it :accessory units; greater flexibility through the aLL~ and general zoning
regulations, reduced devel~ru.ent fees, etc.; in return for the provision of deed restricted,
p~:...anent affordable employee housing. However, while some employers believe that
.the Town should require all,new residential and ".~.:.merdal devel.,r...ent to provide at
least some proportion of such Housing aecording'to the needs created; other employers
_ ~ are reluctant to support, that level of ca......italent at this time. They believe such a
requirement could be onerous and might impede desired expansion of the employment
base.
• _ Several of the employers have partidpated in providing some level of housing assistance
to their employees either by constructing new r....irloyee units by designating ~....~rloyee
units within their existing lodgutg developments, or by signing multi-year master leases
in existing residential devel,,r...ents, thereby guaranteeing a certain number of rental
units for their employees. While these efforts area generally endorsed, most employers
believe.that merely signing master leases versus ~nuchasing units li~,...~ the existing
supply only Helps that particular employer. at the possible expense of others. The most
- important objective :identified by partidpants wa:~ to find opportunities to expand the
actual supply of units available through new construction
• Along with that objective of expanding. supply, there was a strong consensus in support
. of the concept of the Town of Vail planning and coordinating a demonstration affordable
_ housing project, perhaps involving the partidpadon of several w..trloyers. The project
could be constructed on present town~owned land and financed through the partidpation
. of the various employers, who would then lease the units to their employees at "below-
market" rental rates.
PAGE 8
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
This project, if successful, could then become a model for others to follow. It would
represent a positive example of public/private cooperation in meeting a critical housing
need.
• Many noted that the Town of Vail and.Vail Associates need to build housing for their
own employees. This will help to free up additional units for other workers th need.
As a point. of reference, the Town of Vail currently ,Toys a total of 267 workers, with
a~r..,~..:mately 167 year-round and 100 considered as seasonal Vail Assodates'
employment. for both Vail and Beaver Creek includes approximately 400 year-round
workers and 3,000 seasonal workers. Of the above totals for Vail Assodates,
apr.,.;.:mately 400 year-round workers and 1,600 seasonal workers are ~...,trloyed in Vail.
• A final topic was discussed, although no final consensus was reached. It entailed the
potential far raising funds for a coordinated affordable housing effort through an
employee head tax, Some ~:.~,;rloyers felt that an. equitable f.,:~,ala could be developed
whereby each employex would pay toward a housing trust fund based upon the number
. of r...,rloyees. Those who supported this type of pmgram felt it r~.r. ~5ented the only
- practical method to solve this problem, in a manner that would involve pro-active public
efforts. Through this type of support, it was felt that the need for excessive development
regulations and requirements would be reduced br eliminated, although development
incentive programs might and should . ~..,ain.
2 -DEVELOPERS. PLANNERS AND ARCHITECTS FOCUS GROUP
Two focus groups were held with a representative sample of local developers, architects and p]anners.
Input from these sessions was very similar to input received from the employers:
• Everyone aclatowledged a critical need to pmvide greater amounts of affordable housing.
• The difficulties of getting private finandng, particularly for seasonal employee housing,
and the high cost of land were noted as~ impediments to the private sector being able to
provide such housing without assistance.
Strong support existed to u.te incentives through zoning changes, reductions of fees,
streamlining of processing, etc., to facilitate the provision of such housing through private
sector involvement.
• Mixed support existed for requiring all new construction to provide some r. „rartion of
affordable housing within the development, off the site, or through some 'Yn lieu" %
payment. ,.Some felt the level of comautment was justified and needed, given a
reasonable.level of requirement (ie.,10 to 15 percent of the total units or employees).
Others were philosophically opposed to such a regulation.
• There was strong surr„rt for the concept of a Town demonstration housing project, as
described above.
PAGE 9
'DOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SNDY 1990 •
3 - Ei~LOYEES Focus GROUT
Finally, a focus group discussion was held with a sample. of local employees _who were experiencing the
.Local housing situation as well. as with two employers whose responsibility it, was to find housing for
their company's employees in need. Some of the highlights of that focus getup were as follows:
• The housing problem in the Town of Vail and Eagle County is severe and getting worse.
• Not only is it difficult to find housing of any type, but the housing which is available
tends to be overpriced and 'is often poorly maintained by the owner.
• There is a particular problem for singles who wish to rent. Often they must find
roo'.mmates they don't know or do not like. They frequently have to live with too many
people in a unit,. i,e., share a bedroom or sleep'on a couch, and they frequently find that
the roommate skips out on them at the end; leaving them with making final payments.
• Privacy is definitely an issue with many r;...rloyees, as is the need for adequate storage of
recreational equipment such as skis, kayaks, camping gear, etc.
• There is strong negative feelings toward the concept of dormitory style housing.
Zmployees feel they are old enough to have. decent, conventional housing such as two- to
three-bedroom condos. or townhouses. They also resist being forced into accepting b.., ap
living situations and sharing of rooms with people they do not know.
• Dispersed housing and smaller devel.,r...ents were preferred by employees.
• Most employees own their own car and .park it at their housing unit, in some cases along
with a motorcycle or some other ancillary vehicle. Clearly, there is a major parking need
at these ~..,~loyee accommodations, and.. the concept of parking reductions as a zoning
incentive in these situations is not likely to work. without spedal provisions being made
to solve the practical parking needs of employees.
• Several ~....~loyees at the group indicated that they are generally willing to pay
reasonably hfgh rental rates, i.e. up to_ $300-$450 per month as their share of the monthly
rent and utilities to secure decent housing with their own bedroom. Their complaint is
the lack of availability of such units.
• As a lifestyle, many. of the employees hold more than one job and fmd little time to
recreate. Unless their employer provided them with a season's pass (few did), many
cannot afford to ski very frequently. One of the ;...,~loyees skied only one day the entire
season and was looking. forward to the summer when perhaps he would have the time '
to at least do a little rafting or fishing. Clearly the stereo-typical "ski bum" lifestyle was
not present in this particular focus group.
PAGE 10
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
C -HOUSING PROGRAMS BEING USED IN OTHER CONIIVIiJ1~Y11rS '
The consultant also contacted several. communities within the State of Colorado as well as elsewhere, to
deternnine what types of housing programs are being attempted. While there has been much discussion
of programs over the past six months, many of the ideas that are being pursued have not yet come to
fniition. Nevertheless, a summary of the types of programs that exist or are under discussion is helpful.
In addition, programs from Boulder have_ also been identified because it is a community that has been
dealing aggressively with affordable.housing issues for some time. It is noted that many of the
successful "examples" of programs nay come from traditional lather than resort communities, in far-
IIung locations ranging from Vermont, California, Washington, New Jersey and others.
This interviewing effort found a wide range of variation, with Aspen/Snowmass and Pitldn County
perhaps the most aggressive locale in terms of.both requirements and incentives for employee housing.
. Those.communities have an active Housing_Authority with. a large inventory of publicly assisted
. housing having been constructed within the towns. They also have enacted a comprehensive growth
management Iand development system whereby all new development, both residential and commerdal,
_ ~ is .zYaired to provide at least a minimum level of deed restricted and rent controlled affordable
housing.. The system is quite coaiplez whereby extra credit is given to "low income" over "moderate
income" units, and in a competitive"systems of evaluating developments, those who exceed the
"minimum"~ requirements are given progressively greater credits toward their approval. Overall, only a
specific number of.dwelling units or commerdal square footage can be approved each year, and projects
coatpete for approval. Affordable housing is one iatportant area on which all devel„r...ents are
evaluated.
The above communities.also have a variety of other zoning provisions such as a requirement for any
residential unit to incorporate accessory units, and also provide an affordable housing zone which
provides density and other incentives for the construction of designated affordable housing units.
Several other mountain communities also. have affordable housing requirements or incentives, although
most, such as Steamboat, emphasize incentives more than requirements as part of their efforts. Boulder,
although less restrictive overall than Aspen or Snowmass, requires up to 15 percent of all new housing
units in developments to be allocated for low or moderate income occupants, consistent with HUD
guidelines. As well, Boulder also offers development incentives under certain conditions within its land
use regulations to facilitate the provision of affordable housing.
PAGH 11
SUMMARY OF EXISTING PROGRAMS
NON-PRurxi REGIONAL DEDICATfiD PUD/SrnuAL
Hovsnvc HOUSING HOUSING FUNDING DfiVEiAP1~MP RIiCS. LnvtcACE
AU~xoxrnr AGENCY(S) AUTHOxrnr, SOUItcE OR INCENTIVES PROGRANt(S)
Aspen/Pitldn County Existing Existing Existing Yes Yes Yes
Avon Existing Existing None No Yes No
Boulder Existing Existing City Auth./ Under Yes Yes
Cty. Auth Discussion
Exist r
Breckenridge None None None No Some Programs Dropped
Exist Program
Crested Butte None None None No No Mt. Crested
Butte-Yes
GarAeld County Existing Existing Existing No No No
Grand County/Winter Park None None None *;o Some Programs Discontinued .
fixist In 1987
Routt County None None None No Under No
(Steamboat Springs) Discussion
Summit County None None None No C~rr~~.. Mtn. ac No
Keystone Have As
Part Of PW"
Telluride Existing Existing Under No City dL County Under
Discussion Programs Exist Discussion
Sun Halley/Ketchum Existing
just None None No No Under
F„__..ed Discussion
y By Ketchum
• Individual caa~a?unitMa lnduding Plrlsoo, DiAon and SllveKhorne are pursuing
- TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
-In addition. to the more comprehensive programs that exist in cities like Aspen, Boulder, and a number
of large dties, there are various examples of more narrow local ideas and initiatives that exist and may
have application in Vail either, as program elements, or as concepts that can be further customized to
- serve local needs. examples include:
• Avon's waiver of real estate transfer taxes on the first $80,000 of the purchase price for
,owner occupied units. This helps to lower the purchase price for units and may be
suffident to allow certain first time buyers into the market.
• Sun Valley/Ketchum and a local Idaho hospital conducted a complete survey of local
employees to determine interes# and need for housing. By taking the lead, and
- understanding and accomatodatirig agroup of .their own z:..~loyees, these three
organizations may help to ensure the success of a local development.
• Estes Park, with a sl..,~..g summer economy, is looking at the part that .~.~.~tion vehicles
can play in housing summer season employees. They are also focusing on recruiting
"oldef' residents (that are frequently married and are very dependable) and retirees
seeking part-time ,~....rloyment as a part of the work force.
• While Aspen has a truly comprehensive program, there are a number of specific parts to
their effort .that merit consideration. Their recentlyadopted sales tax ran be used for both
- housing and child care:. they;have come to understand the linkages between these two
problems, along with transportation, and are pursuing various initiatives on all three
fronts.
• Land trades in various c........unities, along with efforts designed to examine each and
every local_fee for its .potential to be waived, are being examined by many communities.
- While the impact of these programs, both in terms of impacts or municipal budgets and
influence on actually creating programs remains to be seen, these ideas are transportable
and worthy of note. .
• Non-profit organizations. have been formed in some communities CI'elluride, Boulder,
Garfield County, Avon most recently) as a vehicle that can take advantage of various
"public purpose" bonding advantages, and can be used in addition to, or as an alternative
to, the Housing Authority mechanism.
• Boulder has utilized public/private partnerships, through the assistance of the City
housing staff and anon-profit corporation, to construct a combined market rate and
subsidized rental housing development.
• Both Aspen and Boulder have dedicated housing funding sources; Aspen's is based on
sales tax, Bouldefs recently adopted formula will be based on property tax revenues.
>r essence, our review of comparable communities found wide variation in the current regulatory -
environment with .erect to affordable housing. Several counties and municipalities, like the Town of
Vail, are only recently recognizing the need for expanding the supply of such housing, and are now
considering new programs and regulations to address the problem. While there has been a great deal -
PAG$13
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOLSIIVG STUDY 1990
of discussion and interest in affordable housing programs for resort communities in the past year, in
general, the range of discussion is far greater than programs that exist.
D -SUMMARY OF FnwnvGS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY
The focus groups, together with the survey results, provided an important source of local understanding
and input .concerning the. extent of problems being experienced and the range of solutions that may
" exist. ~Based;on a combination of data developed f:,.... the .Cownty-wide Housing Needs Assessment
and input received f..,... focus group'sessions and an evaluation of programs and solutions that are
being tried elsewhere, the staff and consultant, in concert with'the Housing Task Force volunteers,
developed a preliminary set of recommendations and alternative actions for consideration.
These recommendations were based upon a few key r. ~...ises:
1) .The needs for affordable housing are diverse, coveringg a wide range of housing
types and income levels. Therefore, the program itself must be multi-faceted. No
single type of housing or single modification to the regulations will meet the
program needs.
2) The Town of Vail is not solely responsible for pproviding required affordable
housing. This is primarily a 'private res~onsibilit]i of the employers and
development community. The Town will cooperate, provide incentives, and serve
as a catalyst to see such housing provided. Essentially, aprivate/public combined
effort is needed.
3) Within the parameters of new affordable housing, the Town is cognizant of the
need to encourage high~uality. site design and plans which are compatible with
the surrounding community and neighborhood and consistent with the Town's
Land Use Regulations and Y.and Use Plan.
4) Within the context of.the overall program, the community will require a
combination of permanently deed-restricted affordable housing units which meet
rental and sales limitations to be formally established by a housing authority or
another designated responsible agency.
5) These recommendations are a first step. More ideas are certainly possible and worth
consideration. Each recommendation, when implemented, will require that the details of
each idea are fully discussed and resolved.
The staff, consultant, and Housing Task Force, after several meetings and work sessions at which a
. variety of options and_alte=natives were considered and evaluated, have developed the following multi-
faceted set ~of recommendations. These recommendations are divided into two phases. The Phase I ;
recommendations, in the opinion of the teak. are necessary and desirable to be implemented at this
- time in order for the Town to move.forward. in a cooperative nuinner to assist and stimulate the
provision of affon~able housing units within the Town boundaries. These particular recommendations,
we t~eleve, are consistent with research to date, hav..e the support of the majority of affected parties and
- individuals, and have been suffidently refined tha# they are or can be made ready for formal adoption
with minimal additional preparation. The team recommends that the Phase I program consists of the
following specific actions. .
PAGE 14
- TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLfi HOUSING STUDY 1990
1 - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS
A) I ~ ~ sion for Accessory Units in Single-Family, Primary/Secondary and Duplex zone
districts.
B) Create new definitions in the land use code for permanently deed restricted affordable
housing and studio housing units.
C) Consider the role of the Town of Vail in overseeing and demonstrating actions on
..affordable housing. Create a Town of Vail Housing Authority to assist m the
coordination and administration of the affordable housing program. Also, establish a
demonstration housing project which is planned and coordinated by the Town of Vail,
with tite assistance and participation of the private sector.
D) Amendment of standazds. and criteria for Special Development Districts to provide for
Affordable Housing Unit Developments.
» Special Development Districts for Commercial, Mixed-Use, or Free Mazket residential
development to provide for affordable housing units.
F) .Waiver of development land processing fees related to the construction of deed
restricted affordable housing units constructed within the Town of Vail.
1"sach of the Phase I program recommendations are outlined in greater detail in the following section.
2 -PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS
The Phase II Recommendations, in the opinion of Housing Task Force, have merit and will significantly
increase the supply of affordable housing, over time, within the Town of Vail. Like the Phase I
program, these efforts also have urgency and deserve commitment for immediate study and follow
up.
However, each of these particular`programs create significant requirements on the part of all developers
- and/or employers within the Town. As such, the .team believes these programs should undergo further
analysis and Testing of specific criteria and- standards as well as the scheduling of additional public
meetings and focus groups, and perhaps, refinement, prior to scheduling for f,,...al adoption While
each of the following has merit, the team recognizes as well that the Phase II recommendations may be
. controversial and suggest their separation from the Phase I recommendations at this time. We suggest
that there be a commitment made to define and act upon these recommendations within asix-month
period.
One of the .~ronsibilities of the Housing Authority, or other designated entity, should be to further
study the Phase II programs and to bring them forward, as mal? be appropriate, for further action by
the Town .
The Phase II recommendations are as follows:
A) Requirement for residential developments to allocate a specified minimum percentage .
y ~ of all proposed units and/or GRFA_ to be permanently restricted to affordable housing. -
Requirement that all new commercial development or expansions beyond a specified
PAGB 15
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSIIVG STUDY 1990
amount of square footage, provide affordable housing facilities at some percentage (to
be detera?ined) of direct employment generated by the development.
B) Affordable housing units provided "far purchase" by local residents.
C9 Enact, as an ongoing housing revenue source, some equitable levy such as an employee
head tai, an expanded real estate transfer'tax, or another program which would raise
sufficient revenues to support the desired level of effort.
3 -EVALUATION OF REOOIVA~IENDATIONS
In addition, it is recommended that with adoption of the Phases I and Phase II programs there should be
an evaluation of these ideas and strategies, after one year: The programs would be considered f.,,... the
standpoint of how many units were created; problems with neighborhoods, other successes and failures
attributable to the program. Following the review, it is expected that any needed program adjustments
would occur.
PAGE 16
- TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
II - PHASE I RECOMMENDATIONS '
A. - PROVISION FOR ACCESSORY UNIT IN SINGLE-FANDLY, PRIMARY/SECONDARY
'AND DUPLEX ZONE DISTRICTS .
Purpose
The pL.r.,se of this amendment is to allow for the addition of one accessory unit per single-family,
duplex or primary/secondary lot in a low density neighborhood while maintaining the character of the
low density residential area.
Provosal
Definition Of Accessory Unit:
The accessory unit would range in size from 300 square feet to 700 square feet, including full kitchen.
One paved parlciztg space is .~t.~.ured per unit. finclosed parking is encouraged. If the property is
undeveloped, or one in which the existing structure is demolished and replaced, one enclosed parking
space shall be required. All surface parking shall be screened by landscaping. Maximum occupancy of
.unit shall not exceed two persons. The accessory unit. shall be located within or attached to the existing
unit(s) per Section 18.54.050 Il [1 dz 2] of the Town of Valk Zoning Code, . "Design Guidelines'for Duplex
and Primary/Secondary Devel.,~,...ent." When a detached garage exits on the r..,rerty, the accessory
unit may be in..,..rorated into the garage, so long as the enclosed parking space .~~...aias. The accessory
unit is incidental to primary use of the property as a single, family, primary/secondary, or duplex
residence., The accessory unit is permanently designated as a long-t~:.... rental to local resident per
Section 18.13.0808 of the Town Code.
The "250 Ordinance" may be used to r.~., ride square footage for the accessory unit. If the 250 s.f. is
used for the accessory unit in new construction, the 250 s.f: may not be used in the future for an
addition. The two owners of a duplex or primary/secondary may .combine their 250 af. allotment to
- create the 500 ~s.f unit if the property meets the requireni~ents of the 250 Ordinance. The Task Force is
considering an increase to 300 s.f. if, the square footage is used solely for the accessory unit. When a
new single-family or duplex project is proposed, the Task Force supports the concept of the use of an
additiona1250 square feet for the accessory unit in an effort to encourage integrated site design.
Provisions
The architectural design, the materials, and colors of the unit must be visually harmonious with existing
structures on the site.
Access to the accessory unit must not adversely affect the privacy of adjacent structures.
The acxessory unit request would be reviewed by using the Conditional Use Review process.
The lot must meet the minimum lot size for the respective zone district.
PAGE 17
TOWP1 OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSIIVG STUDY 1990 • -
All owners of the lot must sign off on the Conditional Use Request application, if the use of common
property is . tY.iired to accommodate the request. Adjacent property owners shall be notified of the
.~t,~sest.
The applicant.must demonstrate that the site has the ability to dtouble its capadty for handling trash
and storage. All trash faolitie~s shall be enclosed.
Action Stews
Amend the definition section of the code to allow for an a".~sory unit.
Amend the single-family, duplex, and primary/sernndary sections of the code to call for an accessory
unit as a conditional use.
Housing Impact
Assuming. one accessory unit per lot, a ,maximum of 1,306 new •units could theoretically result from this
program. A number of conditions will prevent ail. of these lots from developing an accessory unit.
Many non-conf~:..~ing;lots already have amore units than permiited•.by zoning. These lots would not be
p~..;~.itted to construct an additional unit. i~iany lots. are too small or have other site constraints that
will prevent additional devel„r...ent. Many property owners will simply choose not to add an
accessory unit. It is evident that the total number of units that would be developed under this program
is significantly Less than 1,306.
B -NEW DEFINITIONS FOR PERMANENTLY DEED-RESTRI~. i rr.r AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AND STUDIO HOUSING UNITS
Pu..,.,~e
The purpose of this section is to encourage the provision of affordable housing units in a manner which
is. cost effective and at the same time provides a quality living environment for its occupants in a'
manner that is sensitive to a neighborhood's scale, density, and overall design It is understood that as
part of this definition of deed-restricted units, all other zoning standards within the existing zoning
district will be met. The land use plan unit designations for a property would not be exceeded using
the new density definitions listed below.
Provosal `
Definition For Affordable Housing Unit:
450 to 900 square feet per affondable housing unit. Maxunum occupancy of two persons per bedroom. .
Minimum parking of one space per bedroom If a one-bedroom unit exceeds 600 square feet, the
parking requi. t...ent shall be two spaces.
Full kitchen fadlities permitted
PAGH 18
• TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
Accessibility to bus line or shuttle service required.
Unit is deed-restricted permanently as an affordable long-term rental per Section 18.13.080B. finclosed
trash fadlities required.
Unit is calculated as S dwelling unit for density purposes. The project would not be allowed to exceed
the allowable gross residential Iloor aazea for the zone district if the .5 density incentive is used.
Conditional Use in zone districts: Low Density Multi
Family (COME), Residential Cluster (RC), Medium
Density Multi-Family (MDMFj; High Density Multi-Fanialy (HOME), Arterial Business District (ABD),
Commercial Core I (CC),, Commerdal Core II (CCIn, Commerdal Core III (Cu.u/, Commerdal Service
Center (CSC), and Public Use District (PUD).
Guest/visitor pazking -shall be addressed as part of the Conditional Use Review process.
Definition For Studio Housing Unit:
Maximum size 300 s.f. per studio, minimum size of 200 s.f. per studio.
Maximum of 15 studios per building.
One pazking space per studio.
Kitchenette (sink, small refrigerator, microwave) and bathroom required for each studio. Central
kitchen facility and lounge required for each five studios. Storage/lockers and laundry facilities aze
required.
Accessibility to bus line or shuttle service required.
Maximum occupancy of one person per studio.
Density per studio to .be calculated at .333 of one dwelling unit. The project would not be allowed to
exceed the allowable GRFA of the zone district if the .333 density standard is utilized.
finciosed trash facilities required.
Conditional use in multi-family, ABD, CCI, CCII, CCIII, and CSC, Public Use District.
Guest/visitor parking to be addressed during Conditional Use Review.
Provisions
Both types of units would be reviewed by using the Conditional Use process.
The Housing Authority may be utilized to determine acceptable rent and perhaps income levels for
persons eligible to rent the affordable housing or studio units.
PAGB 19
T01NN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STiJDY 1990
Action Stevs
Amend definition section of the Town of .Vail Zoning Code to allow for the new definitions.
Amend the applicable zone districts to allow new unit types as conditional uses within each district
Housine ImDactS -
This provision essentially allows the. developer to double or triple. the number of units on a site
assuming all the speafic requirements for ;each unit type are met (as defined above). Approximately 750
multi-family units are undeveloped within the Town of Vail. If.every property owner developed their
site.using the affordable housing unit or studio unit, the number of units would be 1,500 affordable
housing, units or 2,250 studio units. Obviously, .every property will not be developed in this manner
nor is;every property suitable for this type of devel~r:..ent. A.s in.tlte example of the ar~~sory unit
.provision, these numbers are listed to give a very general understanding of the theoretical maximum
housing impact
C -ROLE OF TOWN OF VAIL
1 -CREATION OF A TOWN OF VAIL HOUSING AUTHORITY
Provosal
The Housing Task Force believes that the Town of Vail should be a leader in the community as well as
being a catalyst to encourage, others in addressing issues related to affordable housing. The creation of
a ;housing authority offers several advantages to the Town which will allow the community to address
and monitor the affordable housing issue on an ongoing and comprehensive basis. The real success of
any housing authority lies in the commitment and vision of `the board of directors, staff and local
'community members. While other.possible agencies. or legal entities were considered, such as a private
non-profit corporation, it was felt that a housing authority represented the most comprehensive and
coalplete solution All others, while possessing positive attributes, had some limitations in terms of
- function as a public entity, which reduced their total potential of performance.
The Powers And Resvonsibilities Of A Local Housine Authority
Housing authorities are considered to be a body both corporate and political, which can exendse public
powers and have all the powers necessary to carry out its purpose. A housing authority is often
defined as a quay%public organization whic)i has a clear public purpose - .providing affordable housing.
It has' ntariy of the powers of a local governmental agency, yet is separate and can perform many of the
same functions'as a private non-profit organization. A housing authority can buy and sell property,
incur debt, issue bonds outside state-imposed bonding caps, and. receive federal and foundation grants.
The authority earl provide housing management and maintenance service or contract with local .
management groups for same. Policy development and management, and review of programs/policies,
and needs assessment are other areas that a housing authority can pursue.
PAGB 20
• TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
Advanta¢es A Housine Authority Has In Offerine Affordable Housing
The ability of a housing authority to incur debt and issue tax-exempt bonds is a key part of supporting
. any affordable housing effort. In addition, t.:~rerties which are owned by the housing authorities are
ex~;...~t L..... local r. „rerty taxes. This is done to further assure housing affordability.
A housing authority can administer housing programs on behalf of the Town. For example, as part of
the recommendations, Vail is considering an amendment to its zoning code which would require
developers to set aside a percentage of units for rent to employees. The housing authority could
alanage this program on behalf of the city.. This would include formulating adaunistrative guidelines,
grievance procedures, and consideration of alternaite proposals for ateeting the housing regal. t...ent.
This approach allows the Town to retain its role as a policy. maker, wlt1?'an outside entity carrying out
the day-today management of the program: This approach has been used successfully in Boulder for
the last 10'years. The Town of Vail Housing Authority could, also monitor the other suggested
amendments such as~the proposed acce~gsory unit provisions, and could be the entity delegated
. responsibility for determining spedfic .priorities: for the housing program and targeted users for those
programs. Obviously, if the Town wished to pursue a demonstration, affordable housing development
.th concert with various private employers , as has been discussed, and might be involved in grant
applications to the state or federal housing agendas, etc., the creation of a housing authority is
important.
A Housine Authority's Ability To Work With The Private Sector
A housing authority can enter into partnerships with the private sector to provide new or additional
"units. Typically, a public/private partnership requires the execution of an agreement which defines the
resr~..sibilities of both parties, as well as what they bring to the partnership. Often, the housing
authority provides atax-exempt finandng .package and may donate land or buildings to the project.
The private sector partner may act as the developer and bring other resources to the project. The
partnership may share in any proceeds the development brings.
Another private sector opportunity involves the management of units. Housing authorities may
contract'for management and maintenance services for units or the authority may master-lease to the
private sector. In this instance, the authority administers the mana~,r...,,,ent contract and certifies tenants
as eligible to receive housing assistance.
Housing authorities can also issue "itKSests for p.~„r„sals" to develop housing to meet an identified
- .community need. The housing authority can select one or more proposals and contract with the
developer to provide the housing. At times, the housing authority will provide technical assistance or
may be involved by providing some of the financing for the project.
Lastly, the Department of Housing and Urban Devel.,r..,ent (HUD) offers a Section 8 Rent Subsidy
program. In this program, households which meet the HUD income criteria may receive a Section 8
Certificate of Voucher. A ,tenant with a Certificate of Voucher locates privately owned and managed
.housing. to rent. A landlord who agrees to accept a Section 8 .tenant receives a fair market rent for the
unit, as well as an additiona130-day rent payment should the tenant break his/her lease or damage a •
unit upon moving. This program is popular because a tenant pays 30 percent of his/her in...,...e in rent,
:with the difft. ~..ce paid by HUD (up to the Fair Market Rent). The program is also popular because
program recipients tend to integrate throughout the community and uses existing, privately~wned
PAGE n
_ TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
housing stock. _The: housing authority performs an inspection on a prospective rental unit to ensure that
it meets certain housing quality standards and certifies the tenant for eligibility.
Housine Authority Organization
Public Housing Authorities (FHA's) can vary in form, but genisally operate under the di.~~..l:on of a
board of commissioners ~vho serve without compensation: ,In Colorado, the mayor (or if the dty has no
mayor, the president of the council) appoints afive-member board of di:Mars. In most ........unities at
. least. 'one member of the. town or dty council also serves on theboard of directors, thus ensuring a
_ ~.,~...dlunicaton link between the Town and the housing authority. It is possible for the Town Coundl
itself to serve as the housing authority board.
,The authority may also, ~....rloy a secretary who is also the exe~rutive director. Other staff may be hired
to carry out' the day-today operations. This would include certification of tenant eligibility to receive
federal or local housing assistance, administration,of the Section 8 program, occupancy rates, personnel,
accounting services and any other staff as may be required by the authority to carry out its business.
Potential Staffine For The Housing Authority
Organization of housing authorities varies from c........unity to community. Some have very close
.working relationships with the dty. For example, in Boulder the executive director of the housing
°autFiority and, the director of the City's Division of Housing is ithe same person. City staff provides the
dousing authority with planning and development services and legal services. The City and County of
Denver, however, have very different and distinct staff. The main link is thmugh the mayoral
appointments to the board. Pitkin Countyhas a housing authority with its own director, but also
utilizes staff front other departments for assistance in the normal operations of the authority. For a new
housing authority, it maybe advantageous to have Town staff support in the early years. This will
keep initial.operating costs lower,'help to formulate a strategy and programs which are consistent with
.the dty policies, and reduce the risk associated with starting a inew organization. Additional staff will
most likely be necessary #o accomplish housing authority pmgrams.
Other Advantages Of A Housine Authority
FHA's can resr.,..d to a notice of fund availability (NOFA) issued by HUD. These NOFA's indicate the
funding availability for an area, the nualber of units to be assisted by household type
(elderly/handicapped; family, large family) and type of housing (new construction, substantial
rehabilitation or existing housing acquisition). Many times, response is limited to housing authorities or
requires the participation or approval of a local PHA.
HUD encourages scattered site housing and low density forms ~of devel~,r...ent. Local conditions and
policies are taken into consideration. The HUD approval process is often lengthy and time-consuming; '
however, HUD does offer funds for development, acquisition, unit repairs and renovation, and
subsidies to cover the short-fall between rental income .and operating costs.
To receive federal funding, a PHA must demonstrate the ability to finance, own and operate public
housing projects and execute an agreement with the local jurisdictions where its pmgram will be
operating.
PAGE ?2
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ST[JDY 1990
The Town of Vail Housing Authority could also serve as an advocate for the Town in seeking state-level
or outside financial support for local affordable housing prograatis and could interface with developers,
.local businesses, -etc. m attempting to maximize the overall ,understanding of and commitment to
meeting the Town's goals ,and objectives related' to such programs, The housing authority can be a focal
point in representing the Town's interests and concerns related to affon3able housing. We believe this
may be a very innportant aspect of the creation of such an authority.
2 -TOWN OF VAIL HOUSING FOR EMPLOYEES
. The Town of Vail should evaluate the potential need and opportunity for affon3able housing for
municipal employees. The Town should consider nor` just its practical requirements for housing, in light
of current need and the potential for increased difficulties in providing for emergency services, as
supply decreases. The Town should also be a leader and innovator in trying and testing housing-
related programs.
3 - PUBLICIPRIVATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROiECr
Considerable support has been expressed for a program whereby the Town could be instrumental in
fadlitating 'and coordinating a comprehensive, public-private effort to provide a "demonstration"
affordable housing development which minimizes the Town's finandal risk .
This program would involve.the Town either utilizing an appropriate site which it currently owns or
acquiring a new site for the purpose of constructing an affordable housing project.
Under this. concept, the Town would be responsible for designing and overseeing the construction of the
project. It would "pre-sell" the units to local businesses and companies based. on an agreed-upon
criteria. Those businesses would then utilize the units they .purchase for housing eligible ~....~loyees in
need. The Town itself could also be .a buyer, of a certain number of the units for its own employees. Tn
effect, .the Town would be the .agent responsible for putting the project together, with all of the costs
_ .shared by the participating. businesses. Various alternatives could be utilized for ongoing management
responsibilities, such as the hiring of private property management companies. Compliance with the
Town's affordable housing program would be required.
Several methods of financing the project exist. The Town, through the creation of a housing authority,
,could borrow money at below private market interest. rate, with payment of the bond guaranteed by the
project partidpants, rather than by general Town revenues. Another alternative would be to attract
federal or state grant monies or' public non-profit corporate 'or foundation sure, .,.rt. As an additional
benefit, the Town could sell the units to the. participating businesses at a slight profit over actual cost,
with the additional funds being allocated to a housing trust fund for future use, perhaps on similar >
Proj~
_ If the first project r.~.: ?es to be successful, it could be repeated on another site. Various sites to be
considered for the study have bey discussed, and they are attached hereto.
A down side of this concept is that businesses that do not have the financial capability to partiapate
would be excluded. In addition, only employees of those businesses that participate could utilize the
housing. The Task Force recognizes these inequities and would suggest that in most cases where public
PAGE 23
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990,
monies or other public sources are utilized to create affordable housing, all r __.rloyees that work in Vail
should have the opportunity to rent.a unit within the housing devel~,r...ent. The above concept could
- also be adjusted so that each employer makes `an equitable cash contribution to create a housing trust
fund which would be used to construct affordable housing available to any employee who works in the
Town of Vail.
4 - A FOC[1S FOR HOUSING POLIQES AND ISSUES AT DlrrnxENT GOVERNMENTAL LEVELS
.There is both an opportunity and a need to represent housing issues at various levels, and the Town of
Vail,should be .playing a part in ,these efforts. There are a nimnber ~of aspects. of the local housing
problem tha# can lie more effidently addressed at the County-wide level than just within the Town For
example, available -land, to build certain types of projects ~(i.e. entry level single family detached housing)
does not exist within the Town of Vail. Efforts to pursue creaidon of this. housing type might occur in
cooperation_ with Eagle .County, and other towns in the Counfiy. Transportation initiatives clearly
require' some level of regional cooperation.. Similarly, efforts to ensure that various fee or development
requi:~;:..,.ents Dave some consistency area-wide so that jtuisdictions are not played off against one
another, are also appropriate.
The Town can and should also continue to be involved in efforts to bring attention to the needs of the
ca...u:unities in the region in the area of housing, and to present a unified force for lobbying at the state
and perhaps the federal .level: , At the. present time, there are various regulations and policies that are in
need of review and adjustment, and the Town could play a part in encouraging change.
D -SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (SDD) FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Purvose
This amendment establishes specific standards for SDD's that are created for the purpose of providing
. affordable fiousing. The intent is to encourage these types of affordable housing SDD's while
maintaining appropriate standards for design.
Provosal And Provisions
The applicant will be required to submit a statement which explains how the proposed affordable
housing SDD relates to the Town of Vail 'Targeted Affordable Housing Plan." It is assumed that the
employee units are permanently restricted.
Based upon the quality of. the application, including review of all aspects of the design and affordable
housing criteria, as well.as.the applicable Land Use Plan goals, policies and use category, the applicant
who is proposing to construct a 100 percent permanent affordable. housing SDD may be eligible to
receive an in~:~se in vxrA or number of dwelling units or combination of GRFA and density of up to
25 percent'beyond that which is permitted within the underlying zone district using a standard .
dwelling unit, definition. In addition; the applicant ,may also use the definition of an affordable housing
unit and studio unit. This inducement to provide. employee hausing is based on the r. t...ise that the
number of standard dwelling units identified in the Land Use ~Eegory for the r..,rrerty would not be
exceeded.
PAGB 24
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLH HOUSING STUDY 1990
Following are two examples of this idea:
1. Property X: (Allows for up to 25 percent increase in density)
Site Area: 1.45 buildable acres
Existing zoning is
Residential Closter Zone: 8 units allowed .
Assuming a 25 P~La~Caat
Increase In Density: 10 units would be allowed
Density. Allowed Using Proposed
Affordable Unit Definition: 20 units allowed
Studio Housing Definition: 30 units allowed
Allowable GRFA in zone: 15,740 af. which would
remain unchanged
2 Property X (Combines Increase Land Use Plan and Zoning Standards
in GRFA and Density): same as above in Example 1
Allowed GRFA: 15,7'90 s.f.
10 Percent Increase In GRFA: 17,369 s.f.
15 Percent Increase In Density: 9 units allowed
Density Allowed Using Proposed
Affordable Unit Definition: 18 units allowed
Studio-Housing Definition: 27 units allowed
Note: Increases in GRFA shall not result in units that do not meet the specific definitions -for an
affordable housing unit or studio housing uitit, .In reviewing the proposed Affordable Housing SDD,
the Town will consult the applicable Land Use Plan and policies which is intended to guide the land
use decision-making process within the Valley.
Action Stevs ;
Amend Section 18.40.050 Submittal Requirements and Section 18.40.090 SDD Review Criteria to address
affordable housing. Establish a Town of Vail Housing Authority to establish an annual and long range
affordable housing policy document which would prioritize a list of affordable housing needs for the
community.
PAGfi 25
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
E -SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS. FOR COMMERCIAL, MIXED-USE, OR FREE MARKET
LODGE ROOMS TO PROVIDE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Puroose
This amendment will ensure that, each ~L~~ addresses the issue of affordable housing. 'The Task Force
believes that a provision of this type is innportant to in~.,.r...wte into the Town's SDD regulations to
meet the objectives of the affordable housing program.
Prouosal And Provisions
Any applicant r..,~,,.sing a spedal development district (a,~li) shall be .tK.iired to submit a plan which
descnbes~the method by which the applicant will meet the overall housing needs of the employees
. being generated by the, devel.,r...ent. Inc:..r:,.~ted into this dr~cument is a description of the number
. ~ 'and classification. of seasonal and. year-round employees projected by season, by year. The developer
_ _ will be required. to submit a plan, identifying how the z...rloyee demand generated by the auv will be
handled by the creation of newly-constructed units, either on-site or off-site within the Town of Vail.
This plan shall be incorporated into the ~uLi.
The . t ~ :ew criteria for an aliLi shall be amended to include the following:
Affordable Housing:
The proposed special development district complies with all affordable housing requirements as
identified in the Towns adopted "Affordable Housing l'olides:' An affordable housing plan is
proposed that provides adequate housing for the employee demand generated by the special
development district.
If no density ~xrA or commercial square footage increase is requested, a minimum of 15 percent of the
nwnber of units and/or r.::.rloyees generated by the. GRFA or coaunerdal square footage shall be
:provided by creating new units either on
site or off-site'within the Town of Vail. The 15 percent
housfng requirement would be in addition 'to the allowed density for the site. C'.riteria for lodging,
office, retail uses will be developed as part of the final ordinance to calculate t...~loyees demand
generated per square foot. For example:
Office: 3 employees per 1,000 interior square feet:
Retail: - 4 r "_.~loyees per 1;000 interior square feet:
Lodging: 1 employee per 1,000 interior square feet
A specific use not listed will be addressed by the staff and PEC'. A formula equating employees per
unit type would be established to arrive at the required number of units.
For SDD's requesting additional density for lodge rooms, GRFA, or commercial square footage beyond
the annount permitted by the underlying `zone district, a ~.~ter percentage of affordable housing would
PAGfi 2b
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
be required. This amount would range from 16 to 30. percent of the number of additional units or
employees generated by the project. The housing .~t,t.u.t...ent shall be included within the amount of
additional density requested. As an example:
AFFORDABLfi
FLEE MAxl~r Hovsnvc HousWG UN1Ts
- UNris 1tEQtJiFtHIv~NT (9b) 1tEQLu~n,~ TOTAL UNrrs
Allowable
Density: 20 15% 3 23
Additional
Density 7 30Rb 3 10
Requested*:
Total Units: 27 n/a 6 33
• F.:...:~,.t requited for additional density ranges from 16 co 30 r. ~ . ~..t of the unite, GRFA or commercial square , .~,ge
~:equested beyond the underlying zoning. The affordable housing units at+e taken out of the total number of regi.,.,;.~1
Both types of SDD's should comply-with the "targeted" Affordable Housing Plan when developing the
proposal for employee housing. With both types of SDD's; the developer may provide the~affon3able
housing units on- or off-site within the Town of Vail A fee in lieu option equal to construction cost
associated with this unit will also be established to provide IIexibility for those SDD's that have unique
circumstances which make it impractical to provide actual units. The management of this provision will
be coordinated by the housing authority or designated responsible department.
As in the case of.all ~uL~ applications, the overall design criteria, Land Use Plan goals and polities, and
other related criteria for approval must be met in addition to the new affordable housing plan
component.
Action Stevs
Amend Section 18.40.050 Submittal requirements and Section 18.40.090 SDD review criteria of the Town
Code to address affordable housing.
fistablish a Town of Vail housing authority to establish an annual and long range affordable housing
policy document which would. establish apriority list.of affordable housing needs for the c~..~,.~..~stity.
For example, the~Town nnight initially state the housing facilities for "single" seasonal employees ~
represents the most critical need in the coaununity, with rental, housing for middle income families (2-3
bedrooms), r:...rloyed on a year-round basis as the st~.,..d priority. ,For example, rental levels of $250
- - per month per person for seasonal employees and $600-$750 per month for two- to three-bedroom
family housing might be established as part of that policy. Actual affordable rental levels will of&ially
be established by the housing authority after further analysis of the local housing market.
The 15 percent requirement for any development within an SDD shall be reviewed at the same time the
. Phase II recommendation on a percent affordable housing requirement for new commercial or
residential devel„r...ent is finalized, to ensure consistency in policy.
PAGE 27
TOW]V OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSIIVG SIUDY 1990
F -WAIVER OF FEES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, ACCESSORY UNITS,
AND STUDIO HOUSING UNITS
Purpose
This provision is intended to encourage the development of affordable housing in the Town of Vail by
waiving planning review and building permit review fees. The Town of Vail will also encourage other
public entities such` as Upper fiagle Vailey Water .dr. Sanitation ]~Istrict to participate on the fee waiver
provision as part of a unified c.,~...udtnlent to facilitate the construction of deed restricted affordable
housing.
Action Stevs
Amend code to waive fees for these types of devel~r...ent.
PAGfi 26
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
III -PHASE II iZECOMMENDATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The Phase II recommendations are identified as an extremely important ~.,~...1. ~..,ent of the overall
Affordable Housing Program. While it is recognized that these initiatives. will require additional study
and will predpitate debate, their designation as Phase II is not intended to diminish their importance or
urgency.. They will likely r.,, ?ide signiHcant_ results.in new housing and should therefore receive
inunediate ~......mitment in the f.,..:. of further study, staff bate, and public discussion.
The Task Force wishes to encourage ..a ~.tive solutions to the affordable housing problem Innovative
site design,'mized uses,~shared parking, dispersal of units, and public/private cooperation are all topics
that have received attention and should be further explored as part of Phase Ii, and by individual
developers attempting to constrict new developatents within the Town of Vail
A - NEw COI~IERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVEIAPNIENT AFFORDABLE HOUSIIVG REQUIREMENT
Purpose
The intent of this requirement is to meet a portion of the aff,,.~~able housing demand generated for new
commercial and residential development by providing permanent deed-restricted employee housing in
dispersed locations throughout the Town of Vail Developers or w...,,Ployers who wish to construct new
commercial square footage, including expansion of existing conlmerdal spaces, would be required to
construct. affordable housing which represents a portion of the direct employment generated by the
development. Criteriawill be established as part of the final ordinance to describe the threshold of
commercial expansion which will trigger, the employee housing requirement. One possibility is any
expansion in excess of 2„000 s.f. fora .~...,odel, or~which exceeds 5 percent of the existing square footage
of the existing commercial space, or any new building that exceeds 2,000 s.f. or more would trigger the
affordable housing program: Credit would be given to .:....Moyers who have voluntarily provided deed-
restricted employee housing prior to enactment of the regulation. The recently completed Eagle County
Employer survey provides a basis for setting threshold criteria that is based on local conditions and
employment trends.
Similarly, residential developers of a set number (five units or more of multi-fancily market units is a
suggested threshold) would be required to allocate a portion of their units to permanently-restricted
affordable housing units.
Final "threshold" criteria to determine restricted unit regal. t...ents for both residential and ca......en3a1
construction would need to .be established. Rental and/or sales rates are also necessary to establish '
with attention given to methods by which formulae will adjust under changing economic wnditions. `
Rental or sales rates will be established, with attention to methods by which formulae will adjust under
changing economic conditions.
PAGH 29
_ TOW1J OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
.The Housing Task Force Has The Following Suggestions
For Di. ~...~;on On fiach Of The Followine Issues Listed Below
Location Of Affordable Units:
The newly constructed affordable housing units should, wherever feasible, be in~.,.rorated into the on-
site development plan. An off-site location for the affordable housing units may be proposed if there
are circumstances which make it difficult to provide the units an~ite. Unusual circumstances may.
' . include a site that is . t..:.oved f~„ ~u. adequate public, transit; a. high hazard site, a site that requires
excessive :variances, or other limiting factors. The ordinance should also allow some latitude on the part
of developers to purpose "creative"~ solutions such as~ shared parking or innovative unit designs, with
corresponding Ilexibility by. the Commissions and Council: A temporary certificate of occupancy for the
free market units shall not be released until the affordable unity are constructed and have received a
temporary certificate of occupancy.
New Unit:
The affordable housing units must be newly constructed units. The unit requirement cannot be met by
"reserving long-term rental units" out of existing housing. stock, unless exceptional dreumstances
warrant a variance due to hardship or a documented period of excess supply of existing units, as
discussed above. .
Fee In Lieu Of Providing Actual Af
frndable Housing Unit:
The r..,rosal would allow some flexibility. The applicant could elect to pay to the Town of Vail
Housing Authority (or other assigned entity) a fee in .lieu of construction for the affon3able housing
units. The, fee would be deposited into :an account exclusively for the provision of low/moderate
income housing by the Town of Vail` However, the fee in lieu. approach should be discouraged unless
unusual circumstances exist. For example, the fee will be calc~ilated on the basis of $25,000 per full
housing unit, with fractional units calculated.
Rental Criteria:
The Town of Vail Housing Authority will define maximum rent levels which can be charged for each
unit (variation by size of unit,. # of bedrooms, etc.) based upon a f.,....ula related to median income,
adjusted annually related to the applicable CPI. The developer must agree to maintain the designated
units under "affordable housing use criteria" through permanent deed restriction and covenants. ,
Transfer Of Affrndable Units: _
An existing affordable unit maybe converted to a market unit: if a comparable new quality unit is
provided at an alternate location either within the development or off the site within the Town of Vail
Town approval would be required for the transfer. Applicable deed restrictions would also be
amended.
PAGfi 30
TOWN OF VAIL AFFORDABLE HOUSING STUDY 1990
Deferment Of Construction Of Affordable Units:
The Town may enact a provision.which allows for the deferment of the construction of units if the
vacancy rate exceeds a certain percentage. As an example, if the vacancy of affordable housing units
.exceeds 10 percent or, more, on an annual basis, that developer can defer constnution of required
affordable housing units until such, time as the annual vacancy rate dips, below 10 p~..~.t, at which
time the affordable housing units would be required to be constructed. This provision, if elected by the
developer,. will be guaranteed for perf.,~~.ance by means of a f„ ....al bond or acceptable letter of credit
deposited with the appropriate agency and subject to call by the Town. The seasonality of the
affoirdable housing vacancy percentage would need to be addressed with any percentage limit.
B -AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AVAILABLE "FOR PURCHASE" BY
.YEAR-Rou1vD LocAL RESroENTs
Provosal
The need to address future ownership, needs of the resident population of the Town of Vail is an
additional priority of the overall housing program which should be addressed as part of the Phase II
ProBr'~-
C -ONGOING REVENUE SOURCES
Provosal
In the event the Town wished to expand the capacity of the affordable housing program to the level by
which a predictable funding source is created, we have identified three possible techniques for further
evaluation:
• Employee "head tax"
Property tax
• Sales tax which can be allocated to child care, transportation, and/or housing
In each case, the. potential might exist to incorporate a "sunset" provision which targets a specific
amount of funding to be raised over a two- to three-year period, with the tax then being eliminated
upon reaching that goal.
PAGfi 31
a ~
LION SQUARE LODGE ~O\ ~
AND CONFERENCE CENTER N
660 W. UONSHEAD PLACE
VAIL, COLORADO 81657
(~0~) 4762281 , ( A D
U~/~\Il R~C'D NOV 1 6199D
DESTINATION RESORTS
¦
lOD6E 4 CONFERENCE CENTER
November 15, 1990
Editor
The Vail Trail
P.O. Box 6200
Vail, Co. 81658.
Letter to the Editor:
I am writing this letter in haste in an effort to meet a deadline,
so I will get to the point. There is currently a matter on the
table which needs to be addressed with a long term view.
The Vail Resort Association is currently housed in the building
where the former post office existed, with a lease which expires in
April, 1991. Plans to expand the Village parking structure, which
served as the home of the VRA for a number of years, necessitated
the relocation to this space this past year.
The Town of Vail, facing its own impending challenge of how to
properly handle its growth needs, is currently discussing another
relocation plan with the VRA due to the need to expand its
administration offices , which needs to be done as I understand it .
Without going into details of the relocation proposal, I just want
to express one point. This is, that the VRA is seems to be viewed
by the Town as a "for profit" type organization which only
represents and benefits the local lodging community. I feel that
this is a critically incorrect perception which is significant,
because it impacts decisions made by the Town staff and council
regarding the level of financial support which should be provided
the VRA by the Town.
Although the VRA is primarily funded by the lodges and through non-
lodging associate memberships, it is an organization which
ultimately functions and should be viewed as a tourist bureau for
the Vail Valley. The bottom line to this letter is that the Town
needs to understand this and take a more committed posture in
providing financial support to the VRA, which does not just benefit
the lodging c~~~LL«unity, but benefits the entire community.
If costs such as those related to a relocation continue to escalate
and members of the VRA can no longer justify the expense on an
individual property basis, it is conceivable that the VRA could
cease to exist at some point in the future. Were this to happen,
which organization would serve as the "response mechanism" for the
Vail Valley Marketing Board, which has been very effective in
generating telephone inquiries about Vail? Who would introduce new
business, both group and individual, to Vail? Who would solicit
complimentary rooms for local community functions? Who would pay
and what would be the cost of undertaking those necessary functions
no longer undertaken by the VRA? The list of questions goes on and
on.
As a community, we need to do a "perspective check" and reassess
what we really are; that is, a business which is competing with
other resort communities for our share of the market. Simply
because we have enjoyed success in the past, we cannot neglect our
challenge of staying competitive and economically healthy in the
future. Let's not learn the hard way. The VRA has a dedicated
staff which has committed a great deal of time and effort trying to
bring business to Vail which benefits not only lodges, but
restaurants, retailers and ultimately all other businesses. When
VRA comes to the Town for support, I urge the council to ask how it
can support the VRA and the community and not make those doing the
asking feel like they are unreasonably asking for handouts. We're
all on the same team trying to accomplish the same goals in the
best interest of the community.
Si e ely,
r/
Chris Hanen
General Manager
Lion Square Lodge
cc: Vail Town Council Members ?
Ron Phillips, Town tiianager
is
rom VAI LF I ISLAM P01
• ,.~,o. ~ r~ .
FINANCIAL
PLI~?NNING, INC. •
P.O. Box :9t 5 Vali, Colorado 81658 303-47fi•0508
November 14, 1990
Tot Vail Tovn Council Members
From: Eric Affeldt
' RS: Budget and Town Owned Sgace
A. For a variety of .reasons which I hope to convey to you ali•.next Tuesday,
please do not pass a budget which reduces the T.O.V. general fund a ful]•
-million dollars: or .more below~accoptabla.minimum levels. in spite of the
financial high mitre act porforined by some members of our aommuni.ty it is
very hard to rationalize any budget, (pri.vate or public sector) which drains
cash end assumes ik aan borrow to ,cover operating shbrtfalls or spruce up
its'balance shoat. Y understand there are- extraneous events which mieht
repleniBli thp'general fund balance. You also understand thex•e are events
which could further erode the totrn's.financial position. AfCer five incredible
years of grdwth •and capital improveioents, couldn't • we defer some capital
itiems•aad preserve tht fund balance rather than approve a budget. which eeem-
inglp condones s virtually unprecedented reduction of our.genaral fund?
My hand and your eyes would grove weary of this discussion on paper, so I
rill carry on by phone or next week. '
B. Do not allow the VRA tb utilixe T.O.V. buildYngs in the village et sub
market rates when their job can be done anywhere. 1'he proposal to place '
the VRA in the VVI'• space ;is illogical and will only exacerbate the parking
and traffic '~proble,ms. experienced on that: property and through the four way
interchange. The current Report Association, being almost exclusively a
reservations system, can be ]ocatod literally anywhere. Please do not give
up space virtually is the cantor of Iowa fox this purpose. On a.rela>:ed
issue, how do Ke justify pacing the fnancS.al.]y troubled Ski Museuro in new,
.expensive apace which probably could justify $40-50 per square foot rental
rates? Unlike the VRA,.the museum.generaCes foot, not auto traffic ahd cou],d
serve to enhance the Vi.laage-Lionshead ].inkaga if located it khe VVI space.
• Council members sre~ at least partiEelly, elected to help menage and strate-
gize the best use of our commur~i.ty assets. Ida not believe tl~e dual VRA
and taueeufi moves, as planned, are the'best answers to the management of. two
valuable T.O.V. assets. '
Mary 7'hanlca•,
ExiC I.. Affeldt '
ELAlcbj •
ORDINANCE NO. 38
Series of 1990
ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE: ADOPTING A BUDGET AND
FINANCIAL PLAN AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS TO PAY THE COSTS,
EXPENSES, AND LIABILITIES OF THE TOWN.OF VAIL, COLORADO,
FOR ITS FISCAL YEAR JANUARY. 1, 1991 THROUGH .DECEMBER 31, 1991
AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF
TOWN AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR THE 1990 TAX YEAR -
AND PAYABLE IN THE 1991 FISCAL YEAR.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Article IX of the Charter of the Town
of Vail, Colorado; the Town Manager prepared and submitted to the Town
Council a proposed long-range capital program for the Town and a proposed
budget and financial plan for all Town funds and activities for the 1991
fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the proposed Town budget and
capital program was published on the 5th day of October, 1990, more than
seven days prior to the hearing held on the 16th day of October, 1990
pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Charter; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Town Council to adopt a budget
and financial plan for the 1991 fiscal year, to make appropriations for the
amounts specified in the budget, and to provide for the levy, assessment
and collection of Town ad valorem property taxes due for the 1990 year and
payable in the 1991 fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of
Vail, Colorado, that:
1. The procedures prescribed in Article IX of the Charter of the
Town of Vail, Colorado, for the enactment hereof have been fulfilled.
2. Pursuant to Article IX of the Charter, the Town Council
hereby makes the following annual appropriations for the Town of Vail,
Colorado, for its fiscal year beginning on the first day of January, 1991,
and ending on the 31st day of December, 1991:
FUND AMOUNT ;
General Fund $12,931,288
Capital Projects Fund 7,243,057
Conservation Trust Fund 8,000
Real Estate Transfer Tax 1,805,318
Special Parking Assessment 274,000
Heavy Equipment Fund 1,366,099
Police Siezure Fund 58,000
Debt Service Fund 4,776,183
Health Insurance Fund 559,000
Lionshead Mall Debt Service 49,750
Vail Marketing Fund 638,500
Drug Free Eagle Valley 12,000
West Vail Debt Service Fund 7-,150
Total: 29,728,345
Less Interfund Transfers: <7,213,151>
Total Budget $22,515,194
-1-
3. The Town Council hereby adopts the full and complete Budget
and Financial Plan for the 1991 fiscal year for the Town of Vail, Colorado,
which are incorporated by reference herein and made part hereof, and copies
of said public records shall be made available to the public in the
Municipal Building of the Town.
4. For the purpose of defraying part of the operating and
capital expenses of the Town of Vail, Colorado during its 1990 fiscal year,
the Town Council hereby levies a property tax of 6.513 mills upon each
dollar of the total assessed valuation of $287,796,460 for the 1990 tax
year of all taxable property within the Town, which will result in a gross
tax levy of $1,874,418 said assessment shall be duly made by the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado, and directs Revised Statutes (1873 as amended)
and as otherwise required by law.
5. This Ordinance shall take effect :five days after publication
following the final passage hereof.
INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
ONCE IN FULL THIS 16th day of October , 1990, and a~public hearing
on this Ordinance shall be held at a regular meeting for the Town Council
of the Town of Vail, Colorado on the 16th day of October ,
1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building,
Vail,. Colorado.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED this day of
1990.
Kent R. Rose,, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
ORDINANCE N0. 40
Series of 1990
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TO
SIGN AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT CREATING AN EAGLE COUNTY
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY WITHIN EAGLE COUNTY _
WHICH AUTHORITY SHALL INCLUDE THE TOWN OF VAIL; AUTHORIZING
THE IMPOSITION OF AN EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CHARGE UPON TELEPHONE
EXCHANGE ACCESS FACILITIES WITHIN VAIL; AND AUTHORIZING SERVICE
SUPPLIERS TO COLLECT SAID EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CHARGES.
WHEREAS, in the interest of protecting and preserving public safety and welfare,
it is desirable that the citizens of the Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado be
provided with emergency telephone service (sometimes called E-9-1-1) to aid the
timely provision for emergency service; and
WHEREAS, the Emergency Telephone Service Act, C.R.S. 29-11-101 et seq. ("the
Act") authorizes governing bodies to impose a charge upon each exchange access
facility (telephone service subscriber line) to pay for the installation costs and
directly related costs of the continued operation of an emergency telephone service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO:
1. The Mayor is authorized to sign the intergovernmental agreement creating an
Eagle County Emergency Telephone Service Authority.
2. Pursuant to the Act, all telephone access facilities within the Town of
Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, shall have imposed upon them an emergency telephone
charge in a monthly amount not to exceed seventy cents ($.70). Upon recommendation
of the Eagle County Emergency Telephone Service Authority, the Town Council, may by
resolution, raise or lower the emergency telephone charge, but in no event shall
such charge exceed seventy cents ($.70).
3. The telephone service suppliers providing the telephone service in the Town
of Uail, Eagle County, Colorado, are hereby authorized to collect the emergency
telephone charge imposed by this Ordinance in accordance with the Act.
4. The government agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated into
this Ordinance by reference is approved, and the Mayor is authorized to execute it
on behalf of the Town of Vail, and the Town and its officers and employees are
authorized to perform under it on behalf of the Town of Vail, according to its
terms.
5. This Ordinance shall not be effective until the intergovernmental agreement
creating an Eagle County Emergency Telephone Service Authority and implementing an
emergency telephone service system is signed by the representatives of all the
necessary parties thereto.
6. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby
declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
7. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance
is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and
the inhabitants thereof.
8. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal
Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right
which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the
effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or
proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed
and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or
any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein.
9. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This
repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or
ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING this 6th day of Nove~g r ,
1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 6tkL day of
November 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail
Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado.
Ordered published in full this 6th day of November 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-2-
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
this day of 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
-3-
- f_-.__.
EXHIBIT A
EAGLE COUNTY
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
- CONCERNING THE tMPLEMENTATiON OF AN
"E911" TELEPHONE SERVICE
This Intergovernmental Agreement for "E911". Telephone Service ("Agreement") is
made this day of 1990, by and between the following parties .
(hereafter referred to collectively as "Parties"): -
i. Board of County Commissioners, County of Eagle, State of Colorado ("Board
of County Commissioners");
2. The Town of Avon, a municipal corporation ("Avon");
3. The Town of Eagle, a municipal corporation ("Eagle");
4. The Town of Gypsum, a municipal corporation ("Gypsum");
5. The Town of Mintum, a municipal corporation ("Minturn");
6. The Town of Red Cliff, a municipal corporation ("Red Cliff");
7. The Town of Vail, a municipal corporation ("Vail");
8. - The Eagle County Emergency Services Hospital District (a/Wa Eagle County
- Ambulance Service), aquasi-municipal corporation ("ECESHD");
9. The Greater Eagle Fire Protection District, aquasi-municipal corporation
("EFPD");
10. The Gypsum Fire Protection District, aquasi-municipal corporation ("GFPD");
- and
11. Western Eagle County Ambulance District, aquasi-municipal corporation
("WECAD").
- - WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11 of Title 29 of the Colorado Revised Statu3es
(hereinafter the "Act") the Parties Hereto are delegated the power to enter into inter-
governmental agreements of this type for the purpose of providing emergency telephone '
service; and -
WHEREAS, the Act encourages and authorizes agreements of this nature; and
-1-
-R ~ _
_ WHEREAS, it would serve .the public welfare and be in the best interest of the
'Parties to .participate in the organization, administration and common use of a central
emergency telephone service authority; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the following
purposes: (i) to .establish a separate legal entity to be known as the "Emergency
Telephone Service Authority" which shall be responsible for administering the operation of
the emergency telephone service program; and (2) to define the manner in which each of
the Parties will participate in the Emergency Telephone Service Authority; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement supersedes a similar agreement dated June 28, 1988. ~ .
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the
Parties agree as follows:
- I. DEFINITIONS
The definitions for the terms "emergency telephone charge", "emergency telephone
service", "equipment: supplier", "exchange access facilities", "governing body", "person",
"public agency", "service supplier", "service user" and "tariff rates" as used in this Agreement
shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Act.
II. GENERAL PROVISIONS
2,1 Pursuant to the Act, the Parties hereby establish a separate legal entit~i to be
.known as the "Emergency Telephone Service Authority" (hereinafter referred to as the
_ "Authority") which shall be responsible for administering the operation of the emergency
telephone service program as set forth herein.
2.2 The Parties agree that, contemporaneously herewith, they will, by resolution
or ordinance, constitute, authorize and empower the Authority, as a separate entity with full
powers fo enter into contracts, to sue, and otherwise do all things necessary to carry out
. the duties delegated herein.
2.3 The area to which. emergency telephone services shall be supplied and the
area within which service users shall be surcharged, all as provided herein, shall be Eagle
County as that jurisdiction is defined by Colorado law.
III. EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE AUTHORITY BOARD
3.1 The Board of Directors of the Authority ("Authority Board") shall consist of five
members who shall be :appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board of County
Commissioners. Two members shall be appointed from east of Wolcott, two members from
west of Wolcott, and one members shall be appointed . "at large." At such time as the
BasalUEl Jebel area join :into the Eagle county E911 system, the fifth member of the
Authority Board shall be appointed from that area
-2-
_ 3.2 The Board of County Commissioners shall appoint a President and Secretary
of the Authority Board from among the members of the Authority Board.
3.3 The in~ial terms of two directors shall be three years each, two directors shall
- be,for terms.of-two years each,,and.the fifth diractor shall be appointed for a term of one
year.: In the initial appointments, the Board of County Commissioners shall designate the
length of the respective terms of each member. Thereafter, the terms of all members shall
be two years. All directors are eligible for reappointment.
3.4 The Board of County Commissioners may remove, a director from office for
cause at any time. Alternate members may be appointed to serve as a member of the
Authority Board in the absence of any member in the manner as set forth herein.
IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS
The Authority Board may adopt .bylaws and/or supplementary rules and regulations ,
as it deems necessary, provided. that said bylaws and/or supplementary rules and
regulations are in compliance with the Act, this Agreement and Colorado law.
V. POWERS OF THE AUTHORITY
The Authority shall be empowered and authorized to:
S.1 Contract for the installation and operation of an emergency telephone service.
. 5.2 Pay for such equipment, software, installation of equipment and software, and
related services -by way of lease, purchase or lease-purchase.
5.3 Collect an emergency telephone charge as provided by the Act in an amount
not to exceed seventy cents ($.70) per month in those portions of the service area for which
emergency telephone service is to be provided.
5.4 The Authority's funds shall be spent solely to pay for (whether by lease,
_ purchase, or lease-purchase)-direct and incidental costs associated with the acquisition of
equipment and software, and the installation thereof, as well as the direct and incidental
costs of operating an emergency telephone service, including the monthly recurring charges
billed by the service supplier; and for such other expenses reasonably necessary to enable
the Authority to discharge its duties hereunder.
SS In addition, the Authority may do any other act as may be necessary for the
provision of emergency telephone service, including, but not limited to, contracting with
equipment vendors and service suppliers for the purpose of obtaining the benefit of
technological developments which the Authority deems necessary to improve or enhance ~
the quality and efficiency of service to be provided hereunder.
-3-
5.6 No act or course of action shall be undertaken by the Author'~ty or in the
- name of the Authority unless the .same is first duly authorized by a majority vote of the
Authority Board .at any meefing, upon :due notice first .given, at which a quorum is present
ofi a majority of the members of the Authority Board then holding office, or as permitted by
law. -
VI. BUDGET AND OPERATING COSTS
6.1 The Authority shall adopt an annual budget for the costs of equipment,
operation and' maintenance of providing emergency telephone service.. The budget shall be .
submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for review and approval. -
6.2 Unless agreed to by a majority of the Parties or as provided in paragraph 6.3
herein, the annual budget of the Authority for administrative expenses shall not exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000), plus the costs of an annual audit and insurance.
6.3 Each year in which the Authority believes funds for administrative costs in
excess of $2000 are necessary, it shall prepare .and submit a budget request to the Board
of County Commissioners by July 15 of the year prior to when the funds are necessary.
The Board of County Commissioners shall consider funding the budget request in the
County's annual appropriation.
VII. FUNDS AND OPERATIONS
7.1 The uniform charge per exchange access facility shall be collected .by the -
- service supplier and delivered to the Authority. The Parties hereto shall have no obligation
to collect this uniform charge. -
7.2 The funds of the Authority shall be maintained in one or more accounts in
accordance with Colorado law and shall not be commingled with the funds of any of the
Parties. Any funds remaining in the accounts at year end shall be carried over to the next
succeeding year.
- 7.3 . The Authority's funds shall be used for the purposes set forth herein including,
but not limited to, the .payment of administrative, operating and maintenance costs, and
-amounts due to any lender or lessor for.any sums advanced, plus interest or other charges.
No disbursement shall be.made from the funds of. the.Authority except by check and unless
a bill for goods or services actually rendered. or delivered has been first submitted and
approved for payment by the Authority, said approval being evidenced by a writing signed
by the President and Secretary of the Authority Board. ~ -
7.4 Except for any loan, lease or contract expressly approved by the Board of
County Commissioners, the Authority shall not borrow money, enter into any lease ,
agreement or execute any contract having a price or value in excess of $10,000. Further,
the Authority shall not approve any claims or incur any obligations for expenditures unless
there is sufficient unencumbered cash, credited to the Authority, with which to pay the same.
-4-
7S The Authority may invest its funds only in accordance with any applicable laws
of the State of Colorado governing the investment of public funds.
7.6 No Party to this Agreement shall have any liability to pay for any debt or other
obligation incurred by the Authority unless there i$ a specific undertaking by each party to
do so, accompanied by an appropriation approved with the requisite formalities.
7.7 Nothing herein prevents the Authority from returning any surplus operating
revenues .provided by the Parties hereto for the operation of #his emergency telephone
service to the respective Parties hereto in the same proportion that said Parties originally
contributed funds for operation pursuant to paragraph 7.6 hereof.
VIII. BOOKS AND RECORDS
8.1 The Authority shall maintain adequate and. correct accounts of its funds,
properties and business transactions, which accounts shall be open to inspection at any -
reasonable time by the Parties hereto, their accountants or their agents, as well as the
general public. The Authority shall cause to be conducted. an annual audit, which audit
shall be conducted by an independent cerfified public accountant licensed by the State of
Colorado. The Authority shall file a copy of said audit with each of the Parties.
_ 8.2 A written record of all proceedings of the Authority Board as well as of action
taken shall be maintained and such records shall be open to inspection at all reasonable
times.
8.3 Within ninety days after the end of each calendar year, the Authority shall
prepare and present to the Parties a comprehensive annual report of the Authority's
_ activities and finances during the preceding year.
8.4 The Authority shall also prepare and present such reports as may be required
by law, regulation or contract to any governmental agency.
8:5 The Authority shall also. render to the Parties hereto, at reasonable intervals,
such reports and accounting as the Parties hereto may from time to time request.
IX. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
9.1 This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the execution of the
Agreement by the Parties in accordance with paragraph 12.2 hereof, and shall continue in
full force and effect, subject to amendments, until terminated by a majority of the then
Parties.
9.2 Any Party's participation in .this Agreement may be terminated by written
notice from suchParty to the Authority Board at least 180 days prior to January i of any `
given year. Termination of any Party's participation in this Agreement shall terminate all
unaccrued obligations :of the terminating party. unless such Party has agreed to be liable for
a debt of the Authority pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 7.6 herein.
-5-
9.3 Upon termination by a majority of the Parties to this Agreement, the powers
granted to -ttie Authority under this Agreement shall continue to .the extent necessary to
make an effective disposition of the Authority and its property, duties and obligations.
9.4 Upon termination of this Agreement, the property of the Authority sha(I be
transferred to the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. .
X. AMENDMENT
10.1 .This Agreement may be amended by a majority of the then Parties from time
to time, in writing and executed by those Parties.
10.2 .Additional Parties.may be added to this Agreement at any time upon delivery
.of . an appropriate resolution or ordinance directing same, and upon execution of this
. Agreement and any amendment in existence at the time.
XI. LIABILITY OF AUTHORITY BOARD, AND ITS OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEES; INSURANCE
11.1 The members of the Authority- Board and its officers and employees shall not
be personally liable for any acts performed or omitted in good faith during the scope of their
duties pursuant to this Agreement.
11.2 The Authority shall obtain insurance for the members of the Authority. Board
and the Authority against claims which may be brought against them. - .
i 1.3 The Authority may obtain a bond or other security to guarantee the faithful
performance of the duties of the members of the Authority Board.
XII. MISCELLANEOUS
12. In case ,any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall
be for any reason held iriva(id,-illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity or
unenforcibi(ity sha(I not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been a part hereof.
12.2 This Agreement. may be .executed in counterparts. Execution of this
Agreement by fewer than all parties shall cause the Agreement to be effective between
those parties.
12.3 Notice .hereunder shall be given by United States mail to the address of the
entity as set forth herein, said notice being deemed received three days after mailing.
12.4 This Agreement shall be construed pursuant to Colorado law.
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused their respective names and
seals to be affixed hereto, as of the day and year herein above set forth.
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
. COLORADO, By and Through Its
A i i tST: ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By: By:
Clerk to the Board of Donald H. Welch, Chairman
County Commissioners
P.O. Box 850
Eagle. CO 81631 -
A i i CST: TOWN OF AVON
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
P.O. Box 975
Avon. CO 81620 ~ -
A i i tST: TOWN OF EAGLE
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
P.O. Box 609 -
Eaale. CO 81631
A i i tST: - TOWN OF GYPSUM
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
P.O. Box 237
Gvosum, CO 81637
-7-
` A i i tST: ~ TOWN OF MINTURN
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
P.O. Box 309
Minturn. CO 81645
A ~ i tST: ~ TOWN OF RED CLIFF
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
P.O. Box l09
Red Cliff. CO 81649
A i i tST: TOWN OF VAIL
BY: By:
Clerk Mayor
7.5 S_ Frontage Road West
Vail. CO 81658
EAGLE COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES
HOSPITAL DISTRICT
AiitST:
BY: By:
Chairman
P.O. Box 1637
Vail, CO 81658
-8-
n
' GREATER EAGLE FIRE PROTECTION
ATTEST: DISTRICT
BY: By:
Chairman
P.O. Box 666
Eaole. CO 81631
A i i tST: ~ GYPSUM FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
. BY•. ~ By:
Chairman
P.O. Box 243
Gvosum. CO 81637
WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY AMBULANCE
A i i CST: DISTRICT
BY: By:
Chairman
P.O. Box 1077
Eagle. CO 81631
' f
'1
To: Town Council
From: Department of Community Development
Tom Braun
Date: November 19, 1990
Re: Proposed Revisions to Site Coverage
The following memo was presented to .the Planning Commission for
their consideration of amendments to site coverage. The PEC
recommended by a unanimous vote to approve this proposal.
Ordinance No. 41 includes all changes that would be incorporated
into the zoning code if this amendment is approved. As with
GRFA, these amendments would apply to all development proposed
after January 1, 1990. Any complete applications that have been
accepted by the Community Development Department prior to January
1 will be reviewed under the old regulations.
This definition will apply to development in the Hillside
Residential, Single Family, Two-Family and Primary/secondary
districts only. Any revisions to how site coverage is calculated
in higher density zone districts will be evaluated in conjunction
with the review of other development standards for these zone
districts.
The November 12 PEC memo read as follows:
After lengthy discussion, proposed revisions to site coverage
were tabled by the PEC at the October 22nd meeting. Three issues
were raised during this discussion that prompted this item to be
tabled:
1) How the definition will deal with roof overhangs and covered
decks;
2) Given the amount of square footage that can be built, is the
20~ site coverage allowance on single family and duplex
zoned property adequate for smaller lots; and
3) Does the reduction in allowable site coverage (from 20~ to
15~) on lots with greater than 30$ slope present
unreasonable constraints on development.
This memo presents a revised definition of site coverage and ,
revised policy statements on the interpretation of this
definition. These revisions were made in response to questions
on how covered decks and roof overhangs will be calculated. In
addition, site coverage on small lots and steep lots is also
addressed.
1
r
r'
REVISED DEFINITION OF SITE COVERAGE
"Site coverage" means the ratio of the total building area
on a site to the total area of a situ, expressed as a
percentage. For the purpose of calculating site coverage,
"building area" shall mean the total horizontal area of any
building as measured from the exterior face of perimeter
building walls or supporting columns above grade or at
ground level, whichever is the greater area. Building area
shall include all buildings, carports, port cocheres,
arcades, and covered or roofed walkways. In addition to the
above, building area shall also include any portion of roof
overhang, eave, or covered stair, deck, porch, terrace or
patio that extends more than four feet from the exterior
face of perimeter building walls or ;supporting columns.
The most significant changes resulting from this definition are:
1) "Building area" is measured at grade or above grade, so
any portion of a building that is cantilevered will now
count as site coverage.
2) Covered elements such as carports, port cocheres,
arcades and covered or roofed walkways will count as
site coverage.
3) The definition essentially allows a four foot "buffer
zone" around the perimeter of a building - within this
zone, roof overhangs, eaves and covered decks will not
count as site coverage. Overhangs, eaves and covered
decks that project more than four feet from the face of
a building will count as site coverage.
4) Uncovered decks are not included in site coverage
calculations.
This definition will now count portions of buildings that are
presently not included in site coverage calculations. However,
in the vast majority of building designs, this change will be
very minor. The four foot "buffer" provides an opportunity for
overhangs and decks without affecting site coverage. As was the
original intent of this effort, these revisions are designed to
prevent buildings that go beyond the intent of site coverage
regulations - massive overhangs, cantilevered buildings and
covered decks. These changes should have no impact on the
majority of new development.
The following policy statements articulate how the staff will
interpret this definition. The main purpose of these statements
is to maintain continuity in how site coverage is calculated. It
is anticipated that these policies will be amended as needed in
order to implement the intent of the site coverage definition.
2
1
1) Bermed structures with portions of building elevations
visible on any side, shall be included in site coverage
calculations. Totally underground structures that do not
alter the natural topography of a site, shall not be
included in site coverage calculations.
2) "Cut-outs" of roof elements shall be included in the
calculation of roof overhangs and eaves.
3) Any portion of a deck below a roof overhang or eave shall be
considered a covered deck.
IMPACT OF THIS CHANGE ON SMALLER LOTS
The point has been made that given existing GRFA allowances, the
20~ site coverage on smaller lots is not adequate - zoning
standards will force architects to design taller, bulkier
buildings with less detail and articulation, in order to build
all permitted square footage and still meet site coverage
regulations. There is no question that designing all the
permitted square footage on a small lot (<10,000 sq. ft.), is
more difficult than designing on a larger lot. However, this
situation, if it is a problem, raises the question of whether to
increase site coverage on smaller lots, or to decrease GRFA on
smaller lots.
If site coverage and GRFA regulations are out of sync on smaller
lots, it is difficult to argue that proposed revisions to site
coverage are not making the situation any worse. As stated
above, the four foot buffer allows for articulation with decks
and overhangs.
Increasing site coverage allowances is not recommended at this
time. While there is validity to the point that has been made
regarding the relationship between site coverage and GRFA, the
signs of this being a problem are not evident. There have not
been a great number of site coverage variance requests on these
types of lots.
This is not to say, however, that this issue should be ignored.
The Department of Community Development will be monitoring
development on smaller lots over the next year and report its
findings to the PEC. If a marked increase in variance requests
should occur, or if their is cause for concern over the design of
homes on smaller lots, the staff will consider changes to
development standards on these lots.
If the relationship between site coverage and GRFA does become a
problem as more smaller lots are developed, decreasing GRFA is
considered a preferred alternative over increasing site coverage.
3
SITE COVERAGE ON STEEP LOTS
Currently, site coverage on lots with average slope over 30$ is
reduced from 20$ to 15~. Reducing site coverage on steep lots is
a common practice and is generally done to minimize disturbance
of the lot. This is the same reason why a garage may be located
in the front setback without review and approval of a variance
request.
Revising this provision is not recommended at this time. The
variance process is the appropriate avenue for dealing with this
situation. In the case where there are legitimate physical
hardships involved in developing a steep lot, the variance
process may provide relief from zoning standards. The Perot
residence is a recent example of how this process can be used to
solve site planning and design difficulties on steep lots.
In discussing this issue, the Zoning Code Task Force felt it
would be helpful to state why site coverage is reduced on steep
lots. The following statement will be added to Site Coverage
Policy Statements:
4) Site coverage on lots with an average slope of 30$ or
greater is reduced to 15~. The purpose of reducing site
coverage is to minimize disturbance on a lot by
consolidating structures.
This issue will be addressed in much greater detail during the
revision of the Design Guidelines. In addition, the staff will
also monitor this situation over the next year.
f
4
SITE COVERAGE/GRFA ANALYSIS
October 29, 1990
EXISTING REGULATIONS SCENARIO #~i SCENARIO ~2
s
Permitted SC at 209/0
Permitted Site Cov Ratio SC/GRFA Ratio 800 sq ft Ratio
Lot Size Floor Area at 20% SC/GRFA with SC at 25% .red. in GRFA SC/GRFA
8000 4150 1600 2.59 2.08 3350 2.09
9000 4400 1800 2.44 1.96 3600 2.00
10000 4650 2000 2.33 1.86 3850 1.93
11000 4900 2200 2.23 1.78 4100 1.86
12000 5150 2400 2.15 1.72 4350 1.81
13000 5400 2600 2.08 1.66 4600 1.77
14000 5650 2800 2.02 1.61 4850 1.73
15000 5900 3000 1.97 1.57 5100 1.70
16000 6000 3200 1.88 1.50 5200 1.63
17000 6100 3400 1.79 1.44 5300 1.56
18000 6200 3600 1.72 1.38 5400 1.50
19000 6300 3800 1.66 1.33 5500 1.45
20000 6400 4000 1.60 1.28 5600 1.40
21000 6500 4200 1.55 1.24 5700 1.36
22000 6600 4400 1.50 1.20 5800 1.32
23000 6700 4600 1.46 1.17 5900 1.28
24000 6800 4800 1.42 1.13 6000 1.25
25000 6900 5000 1.38 1.10 6100 1.22
26000 7000 5200 1.35 1.08 6200 1.19
27000 7100 5400 1.31 1.05 6300 1.17
28000 7200 5600 1.29 1.03 6400 1.14
29000 7300 5800 1.26 1.01 6500 1.12
30000 7400 6000 1.23 0.99 6600 1.10
Permitted Floor area reflects a duplex lot utilizing all GRFA w/ full garage credit (1200 sq.ft.)
Site coverage created by exterior walls is not included in this analysis.
~
ORDINANCE NO. 37
Series of 1990
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTION 18.04.130,
THE DEFINITION OF FLOOR AREA, GROSS RESIDENTIAL (GRFA),
SECTION 18.09.080 DENSITY CONTROL--HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, SECTION 18.10.090 DENSITY CONTROL--SINGLE-FAMILY
DISTRICT, SUB-SECTION 18.12.090 (A) DENSITY CONTROL--TWO
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUB-SECTION 18.13.080 (A)
DENSITY CONTROL--PRIMARY/SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
AND SETTING FORTH THE DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO.
WHEREAS, Gross Residential Floor area is an important tool
for controlling the level of development in the Town; and
WHEREAS, modifications to the Gross Residential Floor Area
system are necessary to ensure its effectiveness; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning
and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the
proposed amendments, and has submitted its recommendation to the
Town Council; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as
required by Chapter 18.66 of the Vail Municipal Code.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1
Section 18.04.130, the definition of floor area, gross
residential, is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.04.130 Floor area, aross residential (GRFA1
Gross residential floor area (GRFA) means the total square
footage of all levels of a building, as measured at the
inside face of the exterior walls (i.e. not including
furring, sheetrock, plaster and other similar wall
finishes). GRFA shall include, but not be limited to,
elevator shafts and stairwells at each level, lofts,
fireplaces, mechanical chases, vents, and storage areas.
Attics, crawl spaces and roofed or covered decks, porches,
terraces or patios shall also be included in GRFA, unless
they meet the provisions of paragraph A below.
A. Within buildings containing two or fewer dwelling
units, the following areas shall be excluded from
calculation as GRFA:
1. Enclosed garages of up to three hundred (300)
square feet per vehicle space not exceeding a
maximum of two spaces for each dwelling unit
permitted by the zoning code.
2. Attic space with a ceiling height of five feet or
less, as measured from the top side of the
structural members of the floor to the underside
of the structural members of the roof directly
above. Attic area created by construction of a
roof with truss-type members will be excluded from
calculation as GRFA provided the trusses are
spaced no greater than thirty inches apart.
3. Crawl spaces accessible through an opening not
greater than twelve square feet in area, with five
feet or less of ceiling height, as measured from
the surface of the earth to the underside of
structurail floor members of the floor/ceiling
assembly above.
4. Roofed or covered decks, porches, terraces, patios
or similar feature/space with no more than three
exterior walls and a minimum opening of not less
than 25~ of the lineal perimeter of the area of
said decF;, porch, terrace, patio, or similar
feature/;pace provided the opening is contiguous
and fully open from floor to ceiling, with an
allowancE, for a railing of up to three feet in
height.
GRFA shall be calculated by measuring the total square
footage of a building as set forth in Section 18.04.130
above. Excluded areas as set forth in paragraph A
shall then be deducted from total square footage,
B. Within buildings containing more than two allowable
dwelling or accommodation units, the following
additional arE~as shall be excluded from calculation as
GRFA:
1. Garages;
2. Solar heating rock storage areas;
3. Mechanical areas;
4. Common h<~llways, common closets, lobby areas,
stairway: and common enclosed recreational
faciliti~as not exceeding a maximum of an amount
equal to twenty percent of the allowable GRFA
permitted on the lot. Any square footage which
exceeds 'the twenty percent maximum will be
included in the calculation of GRFA;
5. All or part of an airlock not exceeding a maximum
of twenty-five square feet per allowable dwelling
unit.
Section 2
Section 18.09.080, Density Control in the Hillside Residential
District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.09.080 Density Control
Not more than a total of two dwelling units shall be
J
permitted on each site.
The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site:
a. Twenty square feet of GRFA for each one hundred square
feet of the first twenty-one thousand seven hundred
eighty square feet of site area; plus
b. Five square feet of GRFA for each one hundred square
feet of site area over twenty-one thousand seven
hundred eighty square feet.
In addition to the above, four hundred twenty-five square
feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be
permitted for each constructed dwelling unit.
On any site containing two dwelling units, one of the units
shall not exceed twelve hundred square feet of gross
residential floor area (GRFA). This unit shall not be
subdivided or sold separately from the main dwelling. This
unit may be integrated into the main dwelling or may be
integrated within a garage structure serving the main unit,
but shall not be a separate free standing structure.
Section 3
Section 18.10.090 Density Control in the Single Family District
is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
Section 18.10.090 Density Control
Not more than one dwelling unit shall be permitted on each
site.
The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site:
a. Twenty-five square feet of GRFA for each one hundred
square feet of the first twelve thousand five hundred
square feet of site area; plus
b. Ten square feet of GRFA for each one hundred square
feet of site area over twelve thousand five hundred
square feet.
In addition to the above, four hundred twenty-five square
feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA) shall be
permitted for each constructed dwelling unit.
No single family residential lot except those located
entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone or the flood plain
shall be so restricted that it cannot be occupied by one
single family dwelling.
Section 4
Sub-section 18.12.090 (A) Density control in the Two Family
Residential District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as
follows:
18.12.090 Density Control
A. Not more than a total of two dwelling units shall be
permitted on Each site with only one dwelling unit
permitted on lots less than fifteen thousand square
feet.
The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site:
a. Twenty-fiive square feet of GRFA for each one
hundred :square feet of the first fifteen thousand
square feet of site area; plus
b. Ten square feet of GRFA for each one hundred
square feet of site area over fifteen thousand
square feet, not to exceed thirty thousand square
feet of :site area; plus
c. Five square feet of GRFA for each one hundred
square feet of site area in excess of thirty
thousand square feet.
In addition to the above, four hundred twenty-five
square feet o:E gross residential floor area (GRFA)
shall be permitted for each constructed dwelling unit.
No Two-Family residential lot except those located
entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone, or the
floodplain, o:r those of less than fifteen thousand
square feet shall be so restricted that it cannot be
occupied by a two-family dwelling.
Section 5
Subsection 18.13.080 (A) Density Control in the Primary/Secondary
Residential District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as
follows:
18.13.080 Density Control
A. Not more than a total of two dwelling units shall be
permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit
permitted on .lots less than fifteen thousand square
feet.
The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site:
a. Twenty-five square feet of GRFA for each one
hundred square feet of the first fifteen thousand
square feet of site area; plus
b. Ten square feet of GRFA for each one hundred
square feet of site area over fifteen thousand
square feet, not to exceed thirty thousand square
feet of site area; plus
c. Five square feet of GRFA for each one hundred
square feet of site area in excess of thirty
.s°
r
thousand square feet.
In addition to the above, four hundred twenty-five
square feet of gross residential floor area (GRFA)
shall be permitted for each constructed dwelling unit.
On any site containing two dwelling units, one of the
units shall not exceed forty percent of the total
allowable gross residential floor area (GRFA). No
Primary/Secondary residential lot except those located
entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone, or the
floodplain, or those of less than fifteen thousand
square feet shall be so restricted that it cannot be
occupied by a Primary/Secondary dwelling.
Section 6
The provisions of this ordinance shall not be effective for any
application for development which has been submitted to the
Department of Community Development, and accepted by the same, on
or before January 1, 1991.
Section 7
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the .remaining portions
of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would
have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses
or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 8
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and
welfare of the Town of Vail and inhabitants thereof.
Section 9
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the
Vail Municipal Code as provided in this Ordinance shall not
affect any right which has accrued, any duty i:aposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall
not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
5
Section 10
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith ar•e hereby repealed to the extent only of
such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to
revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part
thereof, heretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PA~~SED ON FIRST READING THIS day of
1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the clay of 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail,
Colorado.
Ordered published in fu]_1 this day of 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND API?ROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED this day of , 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
6
•
_ .
. 11y~ <
ORDINANCE NO. 41
SERIES OF 1990
AN ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTION 18.04.365, DEFINITION OF SITE
COVERAGE IN HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE FAMILY, TWO-FAMILY, AND
PRIMARY SECONDARY ZONE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING AND REENACTING
SECTION 18.09.090 SITE COVERAGE-HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,
SECTION 18.10.110 SITE COVERAGE-SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, SECTION
18.12.110 SITE COVERAGE-TWO FAMILY DISTRICT, SECTION 18.13.090
SITE COVERAGE -PRIMARY/SECONDARY DISTRICT AND SETTING FORTH THE
DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO
WHEREAS, site coverage is an important tool for controlling
the level of development in the town; and
WHEREAS, modifications to site coverage as defined in the
Vail Municipal Code for the hillside residential, single family,
two-family and primary/secondary zone districts are necessary to
ensure its effectiveness; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning
and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the
proposed amendments and has submitted it recommendation to the
Town Council; and
WHEREAS, The Town Council has held a public hearing as
required by Chapter 18.66 of the Vail Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1
18.04.365, the definition of Site Coverage - Hillside
Residential, Single Family, Two-Family and Primary/secondary is
hereby enacted to read as follows:
18.04.365 Site Coverage - Hillside Residential. Sinale
family. Two-family and Primary/secondary zone districts
"Site coverage" means the ratio of the total building area
on a site to the total area of a site, expressed as a
percentage. For the purpose of calculating site coverage,
"building area" shall mean the total horizontal area of any
building as measured from the exterior face of perimeter
building walls or supporting columns above grade or at
ground level, whichever is the greater area. Building area
shall include all buildings, carports, porte cocheres,
arcades, and covered or roofed walkways. In addition to the
above, building area shall also include any portion of roof
overhang, eave, or covered stair, covered deck, covered
porch, covered terrace or covered patio that extends more
than four feet from the exterior face of perimeter building
walls or supporting columns.
1
Section 2
Section 18.09.090, Site Coverage in the Hillside Residential
District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.09.090 Site Coveraae
Site Coverage shall not exceed 15~ of the total site area.
Section 3
Section 18.10.110, Site Coverage in the Single-family Residential
District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.10.110 Site Coveraae
Site Coverage shall not exceed 20% of the total site area.
Section 4
Section 18.12.110, Site Coverage in the Two-family Residential
District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
18.12.110 S"ite Coveraae
Site Coverage shall not exceed 20% of the total site area.
Section 5
Section 18.13.090, Site Coverage in the Primary/Secondary
Residential District is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as
follows:
18.13.090 Site Coveraae
Site Coverage shall. not exceed 20% of the total site area.
Section 6
The provisions of this ordinance shall not be affective for any
application for development which has been submitted to the
Department of Community Development, and accepted by the same, on
or before January 1, 1991.
Section 7
If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance is for arty reason held to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Ordinance; and t:he Town Council hereby declares it would
have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that
any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses
or phrases be declared invalid.
Section 8
The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and
welfare of the Town of Vail and inhabitants thereof.
2
~ .
.
Section 9
The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the
Vail Municipal Code as provided in this Ordinance shall not
affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any
violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any
prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as
commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or
repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall
not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or
superseded unless expressly stated herein.
Section 10
All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof,
inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of
such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to
revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part
thereof, heretofore repealed.
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of
1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this
Ordinance on the day of , 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail,
Colorado.
Ordered published in full this day of , 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED
PUBLISHED this day of , 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
3
=t
RESOLUTION N0. 24
Series of 1990
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE FORMATION OF A LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT HAVING THE BOUNDARIES INDICATED ON
EXHIBIT A AS PRESCRIBED IN THE COLORADO UNDERGROUND
CONVERSION OF UTILITIES ACT (29-8-101 C.R.S.) WILL PROMOTE
THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, NECESSITY, AND WELFARE.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, deems it in the public
interest to form a Local Improvement District within the Town boundaries in the area
depicted on Exhibit A, which is incorporated into this Resolution and made a part
hereof by reference, for the purpose of converting overhead electrical and
communications service lines to underground service in accordance with the Colorado
Underground Conversion of Utilities Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL,
COLORADO:
1. Pursuant to 29-8-101 C.R.S., the Town hereby determines that the formation
of a Local Improvement District for the purposes set forth in the Colorado
Underground Conversion of Utilities Act will promote the public convenience,
necessity, and welfare.
2. The Town requests each public utility serving the above mentioned District
with overhead electrical or communication facilities to make a study of the costs of
conversion of its facilities to underground service and the Town Manager is
instructed to submit this Resolution to each utility.
3. The costs and expenses of undergrounding utilities as provided for in this
Resolution shall be levied and assessed upon the property benefited by such
undergrounding.
4. Each public utility utilizing overhead electric or communication facilities
within the proposed District shall be provided with the name and address of the
owner of each parcel or lot within the proposed District, if known, and if not
known, the description of the property and other such matters as may be required by
the public utility in order to perform the work involved and the costs of the
study.
5. A report of this study shall be filed with the Town Clerk within one
hundred twenty (120) days from the adoption of this Resolution and will be made
available in the Offices of the Town and the affected utilities to all owners of
land within the proposed Improvement District.
6. The Town Council's preliminary determination as to the method of assessing
each lot or parcel in the District is to assess the actual cost, including but not
limited to, the cost for trenching and backfilling and the administrative costs of
the District.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1990.
Kent R. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk
_2_
~
WN~TE R`VER ESQ '
NA~ONp~ FOR
P
ti ~ ~~a
s~ ~Q "
Hf
~ ~ ~ ~P,~ ~
' *i~ ~
1 ~
A eMT
14 EbT
eµT ~ i~t7
8 ~ `L 4 C/~Ye• ~yT rr+ ~p 1
0 a Mn ~ L t~~
i 4 yl'~'~ gyp.. 9 '
SE V ~ ee,
6Y~
~N ~ to y ~ pnw ,arm ~ e T ele* ewe + F?GIN~ 1
4t'TO ~ ~ 2 t w ylle eY£ + eM , e TTe ueA~~~ W+~ .
~ + O ~ ~ ~ Gt ~ p l~ TtiF~"
m pYee
~ 1 M
i 1 ' 4 a,,, t ~ Z
® epee d
Q + ~ ~ ~O~ S LDpIO ~T ~ 2 e~4e ~7S Lf 15 It ~ 4 S YOT~T~~
~ ~ ~ ~ pup ~ ~ ~ t `J^+?/~~~~' Q Z ItD Ut, a yi2 eY~
f$'~- '4~ S-e ~ T Bate I eul ~ T ~ 1
~ aue BICi!-1dRN ea~~' ~ wc+ 1 ° I MOT wao! du 4 9
~ ~OCnDOMtlW~ •a ~ ~r ~ ~1~ 4 ~ ~ a~ e4d4 6 a~ 4 6 a~ 10
pQ ~ d Qe Np 4eSf ~ ~q aUe ai t 1t
W Q 0 ~ ~~eE ,,th 4Me 3 ~ 4 e q
,eta 04 «z ~ 4 1~ "'9'e to + ~ ~N a W ~ ~ iwu ro
~ M7t
11 T ~ 4 II k Y
ME4p01, ~ a 1 N D nn 6 ,,Mt ~ OM1 ; r rqa, o(Ylt ql. IL „ ~
aautrtsti~ ~ !9 ~ I,w U teMe p eae ~ ~ ~ tt !T "~y ~ ew' ~ Ir*
' ~ ~ • T 4th tb eNjte t3 N SL ~ taco- pei »
t6
a M ~ t 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T ~ ~
4 eN+ t ~ !a ~ p llf0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l OMa
~
YVNH~ES a gES ~ . 1 ~ L• ~ ~~,tp
~~'t+0~ ~I~~g?OK ~ >t o „ t ~~NG Na1 ~ L~ epei
I IS ~jp1NS ~ coot
.ei .eei erti u^"
~~D
~,rrEo
W1~1TE R~
AE
F~RF~~
R~Q~~aN
w ~O~'~
~o
~
DESIGN REVIEW
sub-grade placements or other means that both
screen the satellite dish antenna and do not appear
unnatural on the site.
5. Satellite dish antennas on or attached to existing
structures shall be permitted provided the satellite
dish antenna is architecturally integrated into the
structure. Effective use of color shall be required to
ensure compatibility between the satellite dish
ant°nna and existing structure. The use of a mesh
material shall be strongly encouraged when
attempting to integrate a satellite dish antenna onto
an existing structure.
6. Landscaping or other site improvements intended to
screen a satellite dish antenna proposed on any
application shall be completed prior to the issuance
of a building permit to install a satellite dish
antenna. A letter of credit equal to one hundred
twenty-five percent of the costs of installing
landscaping or site improvements may be submitted to
the Town of Vail if seasonal weather conditions
prohibit the installation of landscaping or site
improvements.
7. All impro~•ements required by the design review
board for the purpose of reducing the visibility of
satellite dish antennas shall remain in place so long
as the satellite dish antennas remain in place unless
permission to alter or remove said improvements is
. obtained from the design review board. All satellite
dish antennas and all improvements required by the
design review board to reduce the visibility of
satellite dish antennas shall be adequately maintained
and repaired and shall not be allowed to become
dilapidated or fall into a state of disrepair.
. I. Duplex and primary/secondary development.
1. The purpose of this section is to ensure that duplex
~ and primary/secondary development be designed in a
manner that creates an architecturally integrated
structure with unified site development. Dwelling
454j-1
(Vail 8-2-88)
~ !1
ZONING
units and garages shall be designed within a single
structure, excerpt as set forth in 18.04.050 I,2 thereof,
with the use of unified architectural and landscape
design. A single structure shall have common roofs
and building walls that create enclosed space substan-
tially above grade. Unified architectural and land-
scape design shall include, but not be limited to, the
use of compatible building materials, architectural
style, scale, roof forms, massing, architectural details,
site grading and landscape materials and features.
The presence of significant site constraints may
permit the physical separation of units and garages
on a site. The determination of whether or not a lot
has significant site constraints shail be made by the
design review board. Significant site constraints shall
be defined as natural features of a lot such as stands
of mature trees, natural drainages, stream courses
and other natural water features, rock outcroppings,
wetlands, other natural features, and existing struc-
tures that may create practical difficulties in the site
planning and development of a lot. Slope may be
considered a physical site constraint that allows for
the separation of a garage from a unit. It shall be the
applicant's responsioi'.ity to request a determination
from the design review board as to whether or not a
site has significant site constraints before final design
work on the project is presented. This determination
shall be made at a conceptual review of the proposal
based on review of the site, a detailed survey of the
lot (to include information as outlined in Section
18.54.040 C,1 a..) and a preliminary site plan of the
proposed structure(s).
The duplex and primary; secondary development
may be designed to accommodate the development of
dwelling units and garages in more than one
structure if the design review board determines that
sigrircant site c:onsiraints exist on the lot. The use of
unified architectural and landscape design as outlined
in Section 18.54.050 H,1. shall be required for the
454j-2
(Vail 8-2-88)
f'
DESIGN REVIEW
development. In addition, the design review board
may require that one or morc of the following
common design elements such as fences, walls,
patios, decks, retaining walls, walkways, landscape
elements, or other architectural features be incorpo-
rated to create unified site development.
(Ord. 12(1988) § 2: Ord. 24(1985) § I: Ord. 9(1985) 2, 3:
Ord. 39(1983) § 1.)
18.54.051 Park design guidelines.
A. Purpose. These guidelines shall be used by the design
review board in reviewing any proposals for the development
of Town of Vail park land. The guidelines shall be used in
conjunction with the general design review guidelines found
in Section 18.54.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. It
is the intent of these guidelines to leave as much design
freedom as possible to the individual designer while at the
same time encouraging park development that will
complement the natural beauty of our park land. The
purpose of the guidelines is to provide continuity in the
character of the parks which will be developed over many
years. T;~t guidelines will provide consistent design criteria
to maintain the quality of Town of Vail parks through all
phases of development.
B. Building materials and design.
I. General.
a. Natural materials are strongly encouraged in park
construction. Materials and detailing must
complement the park's environment as well as be
functional and attractive.
b. Materials and designs should be chosen that are
' economical to maintain.
2. Stone.
a. Natural rock should be used for architectural
features such as exposed building walls and small
retaining walls. Sandy gray and brown colors are
encouraged, as they blend in with the natural
environment. Construction should minimize exposed
mortar and detailing should reflect concern for local
climatic conditions.
' 454j-2a
(Vail 8-2-88)
ZONING
3. Pedestrian walksJplazas.
a. Impervious surfacing may be used to emphasize
important: features or pedestrian areas. Natural
materials and colors are encouraged, as they blend in
well with wood. stone and plant materials. Asphalt is
discouraged except when necessary for bike paths
and parking areas.
f
454j-2b
~va;? s-Z-asp
TO: Town Council
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: November 20, 1990
RE: Design Work Shop with Eldon Beck, Sherry Dorward, and
Jeff Winston
The staff has scheduled a design work shop with the above
consultants for November 27th and November 28th. On November
27th a presentation on "Mountain Resort Community Design" will be
presented to the Town Council, Design Review Board, and Planning
and Environmental Commission. Members of the public are also
being invited to this presentation. The session will begin at
1:00 p.m. and will run until 5:00 p.m. Ideas on how to improve
the appearance of the Town as well as a review of what is
affective and what is not working so well in other mountain
resort communities will be presented. The meeting will be held
in the Town Council Chambers.
On November 28th, the consultants will meet with the staff from
8:30 a.m. to noon and review the preliminary designs for the
Streetscape Plan. During lunch, the Design Review Board will
meet with the consultant team to give their comments on how the
existing Design Review Guidelines of the Town of Vail could be
improved. In the afternoon from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., the Town
of Vail staff will meet with the consultants to discuss ways to
improve our existing Design Review Guidelines. We will discuss:
•What is working well; and
•What is ineffective; and
•What are some of the major problems; and
•Summarize our discussion by identifying goals for improving
the Design Review Guidelines and a preliminary process for
the project.
If there is any session that you wish to attend beyond the .
November 27th afternoon work shop, please contact us and we will
make sure that you are given a reminder about the meeting.
•November 27th Mountain Resort Community
Design Work Shop
Location: Council Chambers
Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
(Open to public, DRB, PEC, and Town
Council invited)
•November 28th Review of Preliminary Design
Concepts for the Streetscape Plan
Location: Small Conference Room
Time: 8:30 a.m. to Noon
(Town of Vail Departments--Please
attend 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.)
Lunch with DRB to discuss ways to
improve the Design Review
Guidelines
Review of Design Review Guidelines
and Development of Project Process
Location: Small Conference Room
Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
~
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP
11/16/90
Page 1 of 3
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
8/8/89 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for Marijke Brofos will be circulating petitions.
(request: Lapin) annexation.
5/1 AMEND CODE, 12.04.240, STREET CUT STAN/LARRY: Per Council direction, proceed. Schedule joint meeting with staff, Public Service, and Holy
PERMITS Cross. Meetin held Thursda 11/8, 1:30
g y, p.m., at the
Public Works Conference Room, and ordinance is now being
redrafted.
6/12 UAIL GLO SIGN (request: Levine) RON/KRISTAN: Through DRB, or some other process, Kristan has written a letter to Uail Glo. They are still
can the lettering color and lighting be modified? talking. Kristan spoke with Craig Holzfaster and he said
he is looking into it.
6/26 AIR QUALITY SUSAN: Issue of air quality recommendations needs Ordinance being developed for PEC review by 12/10/90.
to be revisited by this fall.
7/17 BIKES/ROLLER BLADES AND SKATES/ KEN/LARRY: Should bicycles, roller blades, etc. be Researching appropriate ordinances for application in 1991.
SKATEBOARDS prohibited from highly pedestrianized areas in
the Village and Lionshead?
7/24 AG/OPEN SPACE AMENDMENT LARRY/KRISTAN: Legal research requested to make Research underway. Larry will report to Council on 11/27.
ORDINANCE AG/Open Space 35 acre minimum per unit.
7/27 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES IN LARRY/STAN: Work with Holy Cross Electric to Scheduled to begin this fall. Memo drafted for Jim Gibson.
EAST UAIL establish special improvement district(s) for Memo sent to property owners by staff. Engineering
undergrounding utilities in East Vail. estimates received from Holy Cross. Larry, Stan, and Ron
met Friday, 11/9, 10:30 a.m., to develop schedule.
Resolution 11/20 to commence process.
9/11 VESTED RIGHTS ORDINANCE LARRY: Schedule for evening meeting review. Community Development will meet with Larry in the next 2
weeks.
9/11 RAISING FEES FOR PARKING FUND KRISTAN: Schedule for work session review. Scheduled for Work Session 12/4/90.
CONTRIBUTIONS
9/20 LIONS RIDGE FILING 4 RON:. Homeowners Assn. would like Town to buy Ron contacted Jim Fritze about tax abatement if Town takes
common area for back taxes and penalties. ownership. Tax liability only about $5,500. County
Attorney has not yet responded.
,,A?. i;
WDRK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 11/16/90
Page 2 of 3
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
9/25 CHARGES FOR OUT-OF-DISTRICT DICK: Prepare updated figures based on actual cost Return to Council with system and implementation used by TOA.
FIRE RESPONSE of fire response for unincorporated areas served Compute costs of VFD on total grass costs. Compute fee
by Vail F.D. for ordinance amendment schedule for re-inspections. Allow eventual fee schedule
consideration. to be adjusted on cost-of-living, increases. In regard to
equipment fee schedule, provide justifications on total
cost of equipment (i.e., add in fire station, replacement
of hoses, etc.). First of January, 1991.
9/25 VANDALISM EXPENSE REPORT STAN/CAROLINE: Compile figures relating to Town Caroline to handle a news release, by 11/30, based on memo.
(request: Steinberg) expense incurred from vandalism (i.e., traffic
gate repairs, lights on streamwalk path, signs,
toilets, etc.) for public release:
9/25 SYMPOSIUM SPEAKER - ELDON BECK KRISTAN: Check professional fees remaining in Workshop is scheduled for Nov. 27-28 with Eldon Beck, Sherry
(request: Rose) Community Development to gather Eldon Beck's Dorward, and Jeff Winston. Primary Council involvement
views on long-range plans, streetscape will be Tuesday afternoon, 11/27, 12:00 noon - 5:00 p.m.
improvement plan, performing arts center Councilmembers are welcome anytime during the two day
location, West Meadow Drive Mall, Master Plan for period. Agenda packet will be in Council packets for
LH - all possible subjects. 11/27.
9/25 EMPLOYEE HOUSING TOV staff committee studying employee housing has Staff committee is meeting weekly.
begun to review the following items:
1. Possible site recommendation and selection far Town staff focusing on Buzzard Park/Town Shops site.
publicly-held land suitable for seasonal
employees and long-term rentals.
2. STAN/JILL: RFP for structural engineering/ Underway.
architectural/site analysis.
3. STEVE B.: Funding and site analysis costs to be
established.
10/2 REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KRISTAN/GARY: Consider fees currently charged for Set for Work Session 12/4/90.
FEE STRUCTURE labor intensive review processes, "fast-
tracking," red tags, etc. Consider reinstating
the street use tax?
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP.
11/16/90
Page 3 of 3
TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLI~W-IlP S~IIITi~NS _
10/10 SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE CAROLINE: Should the Marketing Board put together Committee has been established with members including Ted
a review process and criteria for special events Martin, Jim Stoval 1, Tom Ptach, Jim Gibson, and possibly,
funding proposals, Jim Gibson will sit on this Larry Brooks. They will be meeting to brainstorm on
committee. special events funding issues and the Special Events
Committee's criteria will be reviewed.
I
10/16 WATER QUANTITY/QUALITY KRISTAN: Schedule joint meeting w/Water District, To be scheduled for 12/11/90.
(request: Lapin) Town Council, PEC, and Wayne Schroeder to discuss
water issues.
10/26 SYMPHONY OF SPORTS To be aired on NBC (Channel 4), Saturday, 11/24, on
Sports World, 4:00 - 6:00 p.m.
2821 Kinnikinick Rd.
Vail, Colorado 81657
Town Council Members
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
To All Town Council Members:
We are vehemently opposed to the proposed re-zoning and "affordable"
housing project for the Parcel of land in Intermountain. The
Intermountain area cannot handle increased development as proposed
by this project's developers. An additional 150-200 residents would
adversely effect this area.
It is an incredible conflict of interest that Council Person, Fritzlen,
is involved in this project. The residents of Intermountain thought she
represented our areas best interests-obviously not. Even abstaining
from the vote, her presence on the council could influence her peers.
Re-zoning for the amount of units would not be in anyone's best interest.
As brought up in numerous meetings, this project is not truly affordable
housing, the units are far too small, there is not HONEST adequate park-
ing and the area cannot handle such density.
We agree that there is a housing need but this is not a viable solution
and we strongly urge the council to look at other options. You can be
sure that any council members who support this re-zoning issue will
never be supported by us and we will discourage anyone else from voting
for council hopefuls that support such issues that do not add to the
quality of life for anyone in Vail.
Sincerely, ~
l~
mac ,~~~r:Z~l~
?(mil ~ rN~~~ajy,, j~i..t.~ r.L~,~~
Charles G. Bernhardt _
Charmayne T. Bernhardt
' ,y;'~
Mrs. barley G. Higbie, Jr.
1 Polo Club Lane
Denver, CO 80209
733-8301
830-1465 - FAX
• November 5, 1990
Ms. Diane Donavan •
FAX 479^2157 ,
Dea= Diane,
I
I am wr~.tinq you.to let you know how strongly •I feel that
we should preserve our open space. •
Z understand how •acute the employee housing situation is
in Vail; but to only gain 20~ for employees and have a
developer benefit froia the other 80~ does not seem to be
t'~e best use of the land, or warrant giving up our very
limited open space.
If the zoning is changed at all I believe it should be for
some landmark building such as a Performing Arts ~entsr, •
asd not just adding moxe condominiums to an already over
crowded approach to Vail.
If there are any alteraative locations for employee housing
I urge the Board to pursue them before invading upon open
space.
QPauld you please see fast ~y letter reaches the appropriate
members of the Town Council or Planning Board.
Sincerely,
Lorraine Higb e
. f
t oa aHrrarrvo~ zro sH=xzn~r~* ~ao5 : vo os •go •t t
1 November, 1990
Vail Planning and FYivironmental Cvsrmission
Vail Town Council
75 South Frontage Road West
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Commission and Council Members:
This is in regard to the application for zoning change for density in-
crease in the Inte~.,~,antain Subdivision (again, the second time within
six months).
Inte~.,,.~antain is a quiet, stable, upstriving, family-oriented c,b..~.~ni-
ty; apleasant place to live in where density increases are neither
a~N~~~,~ iate nor wanted.
E~,~~yone realizes that the Vail "guest" businesses need several thousand
t~"~~ary employees during each ski season, along with housing for them.
At this time there is still adequate land space available down valley to
aac.h.,,~date mast of the housing needs for the seasonal influx of tem-
porary workers.
We in Inte~"„~antain have been accused of being against employee housing
or even against employees! Ho~!~ absurd! .9e all are employees. What we
are against is mini-size - "affordable" housing (read cheap) -for rent
to seasonal employees forced into the middle of a subdivision mostly
inhabited by p~~..,anent residents. This is not a compatible situation.
Seasonal employees have no stake in the c.~....anity and generally lack
respect for the neighborhood and neighbors. It is a mistake to mix
transients with year axound residents. It will lead to friction and
problems. Furthermore, a high density complex for rent to transients
will il.u~tiiately erode property values due to the flavor it casts upon
the c~..~,unity. Also is the Town Gove~.~„~ut prepared to ~.~~~ide ad-
ditional police protection a,ga.inst/for noise, vandalism, ~~w.~iness,
speed control on Kinnikinnick, animal control, auto towing of illegally
parked or abandoned vehicles, street trash, etc.? High density com-
plexes constitute increased fire hazards.
Anyway, the p~~M.sal presently under consideration in itself has many
serious flaws as it is adding justified feaxs. To list a few:
o The "affordable" rent is too high.
o The estimated construction cost way too low (especially for the
small buildings rl ~~,"sed. Economy of scale is lost) .
o The occupancy rate too unrealistic.
o The financing too shaky.
o The credit rating of the l.er unknown .
o His past record not revealed.
Finally, the taxpayers and neighl.,~,~a are not proected in case of bank=
ruptcy or other failure.
~e ZfHO .
In view of all the above, it would not be a~,~,~~~,~iate to change the zoning
to acc~~,,.~date; a ~,~~ject as ~~~y~sed.
And then there is this matter of possible conflict of interest involving
a council .,,~t,.,er having been hired some months ago by the pr~l,er to be
the architect and spoke~~.~~~on for the project. (More about that later.)
Sincerely and ncerned,
~"Bachr~h i
P.S. Since submitting this letter. (handwritten due to this "fast track-
ing" going on), I have attended the presentation of Whistler and
Aspen employee housing. I noticed that none of these were plunked
into the middle of an existing residential axea as already de-
scribed. So once again I am asking the Val '.Gown Countil to deny
the request for rezoning as proposed.
October 31, 1990
I-
V.
Town of Vail
Planning & Environmental Commission
75 S. Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
We appreciate the opportunity to write to you regarding the pro-
posed development of the Professional Development Corporation.
Unfortunately, we will be out of town on the date of your meet-
ing, but we would like to share our concerns with you.
We are in favor of the town taking reasonable measures to help
alleviate the housing situation. However, we believe that the
present proposals are poorly conceived and extremely ill-sited.
The Mountain Bell site is the gateway to the town and, as dedi-
cated open space, we feel it is a particular injustice to all of
the people who have lived in and dreamed of Vail to see this spot,
or any other dedicated agriculture open space, converted into any
type of housing. The song refrain, "they paved over paradise to
put in a parking lot," seems to be the new refrain for the Town of
Vail. People do not come to Vail to look at employee housing or
any other type of housing located at our gateway. We have already
heard many negative comments from property owners who have paid
substantial real estate land transfer tax fees to create open
space. They are dismayed to learn that the town is taxing, on one
hand, to raise money to buy open space and, on the other hand, is
taking prime open space and re-zoning it for densities greatly in
excess of what would be permitted under normal circumstances.
With regard to the two other proposed sites, it seems most in-
appropriate to create densities so significantly higher than the
densities permitted in the areas. Several homeowners have con-
. tacted us to express their dismay because they feel that your Board
and the Town Counsel, by approving the Professional Development
Corporation proposal, would seriously diminish the value of the
properties they own and, in effect, take away from them what they
have worked hard for many years to obtain.
We are also dismayed to read in the newspaper that the developer ~
is proposing that four people should live in a small two-bedroom
apartment and pay $958, as being current market rent. Being in the
real estate business, we have some familiarity with market rents
and would point out that the developer's idea is at least $100
higher than the average rents being charged this year at Pitkin
Creek and significantly above River Run, which contains much, much
larger apartments.
Page 2 .
Planning & Environmental Department
We are also very concerned about the social consequences of creat-
ing such housing and a development plan i:hat calls for what would
be overcrowded conditions by any planning expert. One does not put
four people into a small two-bedroom. If this plan as proposed is
permitted to see the light of day, we az~e going to create social
situations far worse than experienced at similar projects.
We are concerned by the blurring of the distinction between afford-
able housing for full-time local people and the need to meet sea-
sonal housing for the transient population. The community has a
very great need for affordable housing for locals; select busi-
nesses have a very great need for affordable housing and seasonal
housing. The community should do what it: can to meet the needs of
year-round people. We should best let the business community meet
its own needs for seasonal employees. We: do not want to re-create
the problems that this community has experienced in the past when
it has blurred the distinction between t:he two.
It seems precipitous to proceed before our own Housing Task Force
Committee submits its report. Have we looked at programs in other
resorts, have we contacted our sister cities? Have we given other
potential developers the same opportunity being offered to PDC?
We must try to work together as an entire community for the bene-
fits of all, remembering that no one group has greater rights or
greater needs than any other group.
We thank you for this opportunity to present our ideas to you.
We remain,
Veryltruly yours,
~ ~
"i
t
Art and Anna Kleimer
AK/jt
• ~ ,
TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM
T0: Ron Phillips
Council Members
FROM: Steve Thompson
DATE: November 15, 1990
RE: Investment Report
Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of October 31,
1990.
The balance of the portfolio that can be used for operations is
about $2.8 million less than at the same time last year.
During the month of October the operating portion of the portfolio
decreased by $1.1 million, which is normal for this time of year.
We have increased our 1990 estimates for interest income by
$70,000. The increase in interest income is due to higher cash
balances in the third quarter then was projected. We are not
spending funds for project expenditures as soon as was planned. It
is very difficult to project the timing of capital project cash
flows with a lot of accuracy. No additional securities were added
to the portfolio in October due to expected cash flows.
Our next Investment Committee meeting will be held on Monday,
November 19th, at 2:00 p.m.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
cc: Steve Barwick
Tokn of 9ai1, Colorado
Investflent Report
Suoaary of Accounts and Investnents
For the Month Ending October 31, 1990
Funds For Reserve Balances Percentage Percentage ,
Operating Funds 10/31190 of Total Allowed
Money Markel Accounts see :page i)
Co®flercial Banks (;240,573) ;330,035 ;89,462 C.73X 50%
Money Market Funds ;2,410,536 ;2,410,536 19,68X 100X
Colorado Lnvestflent Pools ;3,433,856 ;3,433,856 28.03X 100X
Total ;3,193,283 ;2,740,571 ;5,933,854 48,44X
Coflflercisl Savings ~
Banks Loans
Certificates of Deposii (see page 2)
Eagle County Institutions O.OOX
tither Colorado Institutions O.OOX
National Institutions ;1,287,000 ;1,089,000 ;1,485,000 ;693,000 ;2,178,900 17.78X
Total 51,287,000 ;1,089,000 ;i,485,000 ;693,000 =2,118,000 17.78X i00X
Percentage of Portfolio in Savings A Loans 8.89X 25X
U.S. Governflent Securities (see page 3)
Repurchase Agreeflents ;i89,1G8 ;189,108 1.54X 75X
Treasury Notes & Bills ;230,000 ;650,600 ;1,080,000 6,82X 100X
GNMA's ;162,349 ;162,349 1.33X 100X
O.S. "savings Bonds ;19,878 ;19,878 O.16X 100X
Federal Agency Discount Notes ~ Bcnds ;2,201,456 ;484,351 ;2,685,837 2L94X 100X
Total $2,613,683 ;1,523,489 ;4,137,172 33.79X
Total Portfolio ;7,291,966 ;4,957,060 ;12,249,026 100.00X
Maturing Within 12 Months ;6,780,739 ;4,470,952 ;11,251,691 91.86X
Maturing (tithin 24 Months ;99,000 ;297,600 ;396,000 3.23X
Maturing After 24 Months ;412,227 ;189,108 ;601,335 4.91X
;7,291,966 ;4,957,060 ;12,249,026 100.00X
BreakdoNn ;,f Reserve Funds
G.G. Bcnd Reserve ;2,641,53T
Parking Structure Bond Proceeds ;1,845,955
Booth Creek Mitigation Proceeds ;195,661
Chuck Anderson Menorial ;10,991
Eealth Insurance Funds ;262,916
;4,957,060
11/15/90j1p
1nvSflG1G
'
Roney Market Accounts
as of Gctober 31, 1990
--For the Ronth of October--
Institution Balances
Type of Accounts Righ LoW Average 10131/90
CORRERCiAL BANK ACCOUNTS
First Bank of Vail -Operating
Interest 7.420% 6.900% 7.250%
Balance =1,876,510 =327,204 5647,422 (5236,364
First Bank of Vail -Insurance
Interest 7.420% 6.900% 7.250%
Balance 5262,916
Central Bank of Denver Reserve Accounts
Interest S.OOOX
Balance 52,850
Central Bank of Denver
Interest 7.i66X
General Operating Account
Balance 56,782
Parking Structure Clearing Account
Balance =53,278
Total CoeEercial bank Accounts =89,462 .
LOCAL GOVERNRENT 1NVESTRENT POOL
Colorado Trust (Investment Pooh
Interest 7.560%
Balance 53,4"x3,856
RONEI` KARKET RCTUAL FUNCS
Federated Securities Corp. U. S. Treasury Trust Reserve Account
Interest 7.645%
Balance 5173,874
Fidelity Investment Government Roney Rarket Accounts
interest 7.670%
Bond Issae Reserve Account x~
Balance 5982,705 '
Booth Creek Imp Funds
Balance 5195,661
Parking Structure Coast Fund Account
Balance 51,058,296
Total Roney Rarket Rutual Fund 52,410,536
Total all accounts 55,933,854
~#Account Subject to Arbitrage Rebate
il/15/90
inamm0l0 Page 1
Certificates of Deposit
as of October 31, 1990
Bank Nape, Location Days to
bates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity
Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Valae
First Aoerican Bank, Boston, MA
FDIC 10.290X 10.290X 12-Nov-87 12-Nov-90 1096 ;99,000
Standard Pacific Savings and Loan, Newport, CA Reserved Funds
FSLIC 9.B75X 9.670X 26-Nay-89 28-May-91 732 ;99,000
Century Bank and Trust, Sooerville, ~MA Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.450X 9.450X 26-Map-89 26-Nov-90 549 ;99,000
Century Bank of Suffolk, Suffolk, MA Reserved Fonds
FDIC 9.450X 9.450X 30-May-89 29-Nov-90 548 ;99,000
First Savings and Loan, Beverly Hills, CA
FSLIC 10.3±5X 10.125X 10-Apr-89 03-Jun-91 784 ;99,000
Sterling Savings and Loan, Irvine, CA
FSLIC 10.500X 10.250X 10-Apr-89 02-Dec-91 966 ;99,006
Bay loan ~ Investnent Bank, East Greenwich, RI, Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.300X 9.G50X Il-Jul-89 02-Dec-91 874 ;99,600
Hooestead Savings Association, Middletown, PA, Reserved Funds
r"SLIC 9.100% 8.900X 21-Jul-89 02-Dec-91 B64 ;99,000
East Bank, New Yotk, NY
FDIC 9.QOGX 8.9GOX 11-Jul-89 1L-Jul-91 730 ;99,000
Brentwood Squire Savings and Loan, Los Angeles, CA
FSLIC 10.150X 9.90GX 09-May-89 08-Map-91 729 $99,000
St. Ednond's Savings and Loan Association, Philadelphia, PA
FSLIC 10.25CX 10.000X 05-Map-89 05-Nov-90 549 ;99,000
Anerican General Financial Center, Midvale, UT
FDIC 8.45X 8.25X 23-May-90 23-Nov-90 184 ;99,000
Palner National Bank, Mashington, DC
FDIC 8.25X 8.25X 22-Map-90 30-Nov-90 192 ;99,000
Modesto Bank Canpanp, Modesto, CA
FDIC 8.35X 8.35X 23-May-90 20-Nov-90 181 ;99,000
Seacoast Savings Bank, Dover, NH
FDIC B.25X 8.25X~ 22-Map-90 30-Nov-90 192 ;99,000
Westside Savings and Loan Association, CA
FSLIC 8.450X 8.450X 13-Mar-90 30-Nov-90 262 ;99,000
Page 2 Continued
1
Certificates of Deposit
as of October 31, 1990
Bank Naee, Location Days to
Rates Purchase Maturity Maturity Maturity
Ins Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Value
Republic National Bank, Phoenix, A2 Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.750: 9.500% 30-May-89 29-Nov-90 548 599,000
Republic Bank of California, Torrance, CA
FDIC 8.50GS 8.500% 22-Nay-90 14-Dec-90 206 599,000
Colonial National Bank USA, Rilnington, DE
FDIC 8.500% 8.250% 14-Map-90 13-Nov-90 183 599,000
Resters Federal Savings A Loan, San Mateo, CA
FSLiC 8.750% 8.500% 14-May-90 13-No.v-90 183 599,000
Resters Financial Savings Bank, Irvine, CA
FSLIC 8.750: 8.500% 14-Nay-90 13-Nov-90 183 599,000
Lyndonville Savings Bank ~ Trust, Lyndonville, 9T, Reserved Funds
FDIC 9.250% 9.050% 25-Jui-89 O1-Jun-92 1041 599,000
Avg Yield 9.083% 52,178,000
Daps to Maturity 123
11/15190j1p
invcd0l0 Page 2
. ,
e
Government Securities
as of October 31, 1990
###Treasury Notes & Bills###
Years to
Interest Rate Purchase Natarity Natarity Years to Book Par
type Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Natarity Value Value
Bend Pooled Cash 8.875% 7.470X 11-Nar-86 15-Feb-96 9.94 5.30 ;230,000 ;230,OOG
Bond Parking 6.875% 9.067% 02-Dec-88 30-Nov-90 1.99 0.06 ;250,000 ;250,000
Bond Cebt Service 9.375% 9.630% 28-Feb-89 28-Feb-91 2.00 0.33 ;200,000 5200,000
Bond Debt Service ~.250X 8.259% 31-Aug-89 31-Aug-91 2.00 0.83 ;400,000 ;400,000
Average Natarity Years 1.31 ;1,06G,000 ;1,060,000
Average Yield 8.53X
###Repurchase Agreements###
Purchase Natarity Book
Institution Yield Date Date Value
Horgan Stanley # 7.850% O1-Jun-90 O1-Dec-95 ;189,108
# Sinking Fund Investment to Retirz C.O. Bonds
###GNNA'S###
Years to Estimated
Interest Rate Purchase Natarity Natarity Years to Principal
Fool Coupon Yield Date Cate at Purchase Natarity Outstanding
5803 B.000X 6.480% 14-Nov-86 15-Oct-05 19.10 16.00 ;40,246
I3003 B.000X 9.5COX 24-Gct-B6 15-Oct-O6 20.20 17.00 ;53,839
14659 6.000% 9.200% 24-Oct-66 15-Jan-07 21.20 18.00 ;68,264
Avg Yield 9.121% ;162,349
###O.S. Savings Bonds###
Years to
Issue Natarity Natarity Years to Book Natarity
Series Yield Date Date at Purchase Natarity Value Value
EE 7.170% O1-Oct-86 O1-Oct-96 10.00 5,92 ;19,878 ;30,000
###Federal Agency Ciscount Notes ~ Bonds###
Days to
Interest Bate Purchase Natarity Natarity Daps to Book Natarity
Agency Fund Coupon Yield Date Date at Purchase Natarity Value Value
FRLB Pooled Cash 8.305% 15-Nay-90 16-Nov-90 185.00 16,00 ;998,313 51,040,000
FHLB Parking 8.006% B.000X 25-dam-90 25-Jan-91 365.00 86.00 ;250,000 ;250,000
FRLB Pooled Cash 8.400% 8.170% 15-Feb-90 26-Nov-90 284.00 26.00 ;500,000 ;500,000
FBNC Pooled Cash 8.170% 30-Jan-90 20-Nov-90 294.00 20.00 ;703,143 ;750,000
FRNC Parking 8.170X. 30-Jan-90 20-Nov-90 294.00 20.00 ;234,381 ;250,000
;2,685,837 ;2,790,000
Average Yield 8.20%
Average Days to Natarity 34 Total ;4,137,172
11/15/90j1p
invtr0l0 Page 3
fl f f l ~ rl f II I fl
Weekly art walks J. Cotter Gallery Mudhead Gallery
The Vail Valley Gallery Assodation invites you to November Jce Cornett: Gold & inlay work November Robert Redbird: Kiowa Painter
attend our winter season art walks, every Thursday December James Barker. High karat gold December Mike Curtis: Bronzes
evening from five to nine. work January Don Baker. Bronzes
Take a leisurely stroll through Vail Village and January Best of Colorado: Jewelry by February Doug Van liowd: Bronzes
11onsHead and then head out to Minturn and Beaver Colorado's best goldsmiths March Pottery and Kachinas
creek to continue your walk. February Six German goldsmiths April Jewelry
Whether you're just a browser or serious collec- March Goph Albitz: Fine stone inlay in gold
tor, you'll enjoy the casual and friendly atmosphere. Group Show: In-house artists and My Jeweller
Enjoy spedalshowings-meet featured artists- goldsmiths November Vonhausen Studio, Renate Ileite:
and get acquainted with the gallery owners. contemporary, three-dimensional
From Contemporary to Southwestern To Western Cowboys & Indians wall decorations
to Old Masters, the Vail Valley Gallery Assoaation November Pueblo pottery December Four in-house designers: New
members cover the gamut-the look forward to December Navajo sandpalndngs designs
meeting you. Dec. 27
Jan.1 Hopi Kachina show and carving Kit Karbler and Michael David:
demonstration Hand-blown contemporary sculpture
January Cowboy an and artifacts Fbel: Special collection of Swiss
February Indian artifacu time pieces
A Place On Earth March Old and new Indian blankets and ergs January Michael Good: 18K gold jewelry
November Kenneth Scott: Metals Thomas Ilolzer: Contemporary
Decemher Rohert lanrm: Bronze sculpnlre Driscol Galleries stained glass
January Celina Glass: 51:tined Glass November Edward Norton Ward: l'~,tintings February Bernd Munsteiner: Sculptural
February Pamela Ilill: Quilts Da:ember Mark Thompson: Egg tempera gemstones
March Steven htaslaclr: Glass paintings Randy Strong: Contemporary glass art
April Jeanne Stevens-Sollman: Ceramic January George Lunda;n: Bronze sculpture March Cornelis Flollander: High-fashion
sculpture February Charles lthinehart: Luminist gold and diamond jewelry
Jo Saylors: Bronze sculpture Carolyn Sale: Contemporary ceramic
Arnesen Fine Art Ltd. March Kim English: Paintings sculpture
Nov l5 -Doc. 19 New works by gallery artists April Scott Jennings: Paintings
Dec.20-Jan.10 Jeane Feuerman: Superrealist The Squash Blossom
figurative sculptor Lionshead Gallery Deg:. 15 Iliswric AnTCrican Indian artifacts
Jan. ll -FAT t3,
htdnh.ra.,,;„I~,h..:,,,.;. - December Earl Bins AntiyuitiesShow: rugs, pottery,
Feb.14-Mar. 13 Betty Gold: Abstract steel sculpture January Bill Mack masks, beadwork, baskets
Y~11~aD i Mat~ettes: Palntin~ February Pablo Antonio Milan Dec. 27 - 29 Raoul Sosa: Contemporary gold
bt? ~d I 14-Apr. 20 Margi Wier: Contemporary March Mark Dickson jewelry
r ~ sculptor of abstract cows Frank 1lowell Febnuary 14 Benny & Valerie Aldrich: Bne stone
inlay
fl~ett-Rey Gallery Lone Mountain Gallery March I:ury(~ILJr: Ma.,terbKddandsitver~Tnidr
Ua:. 27 Works by gallery artists November 23 Mark Swazo-Ilinds: Fetishes
Feb. 14 Dave McGary: Bronzes December 20 Larry Yazzie: Sculpture Vail Fine Art Gallery, Inc.
Da:ember 27 Sonwai: Jewelry ~ Derember Michael Atkinson: Watercolors and
Co¢swell Gallery Bryson Nequatewa: Kachinas bronzes
November 23 Clyde Aspevig January 3 Dora Tse Pe-Pena and Russel January Stephen Csoka: Oils and etchings
Dwain Freeman Sanchez: Ceramics February Mark King: Original acrylics and
December 27 Works by gallery artists February 14 Echos of the Past: 19th Century serigraphs
January 3 Jean RiJ....:sw: P.rinting,:,~. ~ American Indian art March Makk Family. Original oils and
All artists' receptions are from 5 - 9 p•m• March I S Peter Ray James: Masks and serigraphs
paintings
AI Nez: Jewelry
All artists' receptions are from 5 - 9 p.m.
' V A l t M A G A Z I N E / S T A T E O F THE ART S
31A
1~ Suburbs Dress Themselves Up With Art
Experts say public sculptures and statuary provide civic pride and o setae of ploc:e - .
1r D..e u+oaefefr ~
'yl • puu out of cord mr4uas and
cure r .~ooal e! aftlp
4 u Httrrt w Iced . pre.. Dulldlast
of wpWnkaUet b t?t Iced d ~ ~ 7De diretatty o! w. atYW pas
trsrt aemtt end saopplog aaaLs, tWe c tWtunl ea
suWrb etree tat aetiee are eerdmg bJaff Eorio, lee dfranar
elandag per4. Waa+s ud clear of perb and eommuaay rrrrr
ry1Wk Rlaees ri1W an w • Stud. for tea Itame4 wblea aoeatrage
uela eompedr b todude an wpm d?:.
7De artwork from sumr oat. ' • atgntog oev buUdlaga
W treNtliwl srylr b aDstnq .~.r. 1' ~ 'We doer jun vmt mburbm
sculpiuw, brlop m aura of r? ~ }j_a•; aryoooalr, trs rant IWm! spin'' C~/~~^' r J
~~1oe.. fum~mt b mburbs vboae ata4, _'>"'Y`;~`"•~c•.t~. Eorbeald. `/~J'~
emu an mtr..dagly afnuea4 ! Neaaa Qrre:ad ~
m0 mbeea
"Wbm people toove b the suD• borne art Dneds ,
urW tolWe aed Ark tDeY bok fm la Trtmont. Yeym HW Ball rfl• ~ 1~~ya
~wme of We aarmtnr Wet Way ad Wedtylwmrewboudrr•' ~ Y
' cad m roe cftlss,` sak! Baoatya Uer tDb ywr wpm Die ratusad b
TU/Dmaa of tbs Wtloaal Fades- rrppotnt a board member wbo
moot /m the Arta 'RDq neat a ad a snrraaUstk asrbl . r
acct of pbn Wet pablk art oa
~~tii aOtlpwta la We aer lily Ubrary. m L _ _
7be vDlmldn! pleoe taUed r ' ' +/I(~11J`~/
lo1WUy, suburDm dvaLan sr' ~
eDeved, amWtlau an pro)ety, 'Dream Voyage' Dante loom We
dtocdag lnstrd b decorate pub edlial. A bmk a dut4, a huge .
aed other erase a1W a afmple ~Ilded rgodoel lnmc and .corr. ~ /?~~~C~%~
louatab m a modem ateoa seulp~ Drt seem b net W a w q m• r`
tors. ~ aogc orbs 7bs troll b `am good
7Dor dap an over. Pi1DBe an•; 6n.` 8x11 said.
nest Dal Demme m tmponaat' ~ La Ooaoard, We 1{100,000 HeA•
amroe o! ttvle pride and Wmtby rage Wtevsy aeulptun b We • ~vV'
to W submba _ ~y. ntue of pule aonslarnailon am ~
r.. - 'What rte art aedag b We _ dub pride. Delidvdy taUed `Per•
•Untted Sute b We urDaabation• :.1; ~ euplae Pla:a` We alsarort t ~t
of We suDmDa and an b pan of ~ v ~ turesrl eaormoW alumlaumpoln ~ ~ ~ /
Wet pretty,' Wd Edward So)a • 'y ~ ~~ed~ that beset o.u a / I~j~~/'
' 'profeaor of mDm and regional ~ I ~ r
4la~t at tDe va , o! fAU• _ Lot tell a¢gtY Cnomrd torso III"'
lornu at Loa Angels ,.V otuoad • bogtlme pry fbuadl
7De tread b moo evident la ~a+~ ~ member vDo ea the plea
'4YWOrala v md'deasd Woe acv muadl,
' Attetdlag b We CaBlorale ~ mamben -all of whom vmt We
Atu Caiadl, a cute agmty that •'Y~IR. artarort rakm doaro. TDe «Wp•
Nrards ~rmu b anbb and ant' Il`..:1°''lr tun b stW staodtog, Dut dry 0114
tr_ srp.waarwaieto.o+or qeL an trY1at b aegoiute NtD
mgaalatloat. Wtn are 100 puDUr ' , lb arlfat b Dsre ft 1'emet'ed. Wd
an programs u CeWorou.Ilon of Cori Wash, err suroror fa Walnut Creek, sat in hint of o redwood fbomrd mym Eyroa OmpbdL
1Le programs wen founded sfoa vnd sapper eculpturi he ocquared for Heather Farm Park'' Lmy wpbs vbo dlretts Palo
-tY85, and ewer an m We wDurba 1 _ ,
. 'Art auks tnburb awn Bv: Allot lSyeuold tort orgealas•
•ielemdmo~mterntla `•Wd~TtneUgFI~IDF11 i..--•. riaurlslsinglnPbassueDuUpper,! tlon.Welbstprogramoftlaldad' .
g m Wt Bay Area. Wd suburDa:. au•
h: Pies Sal; a profeswr etpetftue o!. 1a Sm . Flafad PobUe Art ArUngba Ohio. where pule lead. dim[r<a us not mme aftlnl than
~r ;ari Dbsory at We U_.. ~ o! Csl• SVorb. • tbapretri cr`aafatloa as la We eommuntty agar Colum• rddmu of
Uorab at Berkeley and We touu louodsd fa iCA, Du bealgDt ltl bus want b pba moo art fa mu• urge cltln when It
dlhgdlnebrotWelJglvaralryAn permanent puDUc ut_dbplaye b aldpal Darla. la klontgomery yYe b an. It fitit setae IDtt
Nuaaam . Warta County, laid EaeNtiw Di• Ctntaq', abryua4 lour submbs
• Naoey t/arslo4 a: snemDer of team Judy ?foraa TDe group also outride Waehingba D.C. tacentry Oppodtloa b matnvetalal..
4. , : tDa La Altae Ara Commftbe, cold prfap travellog an e=Dlhla b We Z~~ ProT~r to aatlsty W e' public an pkea appear moo strf•
Du qtl, netted m an m pubUc eptlpry, eommunltln' demand fm puDUc dent Denur, ttWlke resldeau o!
Dlg pun, suburban enldmu ttn•
..a. pLee program {hies yeah ago b La Pltubmg, We eriy afU woe all auy Dave mme seem b Weir
' ease Ws atria q UIe !o SUuoa `A bt of suburbs today are to olfieule ~
Y~~ deClnte a atr•!om Dmnu stZ11P sntl~ mhghtmsd gtie;
. •.'Wt aced aometDla that trW' fart o! . fabermaa pulling m hie anE W~ wanton w Wey eaa mm• "People an people, absWer.
F seta `People tmd b forgo wyt ~ and sttnn atv mmpanle W ty Ilve u rural or urban veu m
2sad our sptrlt and our wul` sbr ae were' Wd ary Coundivoman m suburban arses.' Wd liapba.
fr, pald9ttiaeDarWdbbeaDleb Nmiy~Puent '7! a•s door put mEreldmts:"laid_C'IaudiaCuhhalpc. `ym ukc We same wmk W ari
_ to b s park and set an and ba able Una, manager of, the ari tp p
w pondu Im • a•DUa` ' Iost, and Ufe~Demma
a
to moo ~ o: We CaUlorau trnvsrAr perevelr, n ben4 eon•
' !n WaDiut Crack and Snnay',tmperwnal`
vale, detilopen of large olfia .fit oaaasiee town ~ Pubtie an na De e:peasiva
mmptue en ttpulrt0 b ladude Sin DleQo, bu Woatat Small piece tan cost at UNe as
~OUboer anaork m Welr dntgas tltb ye,r fm yuDUc an' gS.ooo, but tlebonu works AID!
7De art 4 latmded b wpplemea Ooal Darr a muetuq mC It's cost a much u g1 m1Woq '
k' ~ lding b We are mtmtfl
tlrtt eri ptoleett. ~ gatang border Im Dwple b go b` alto
7DeWalotitCltekarutommlt•' We urger dtie' Wd Coaalt
' sba altudy Doi about 1Dree doyen TDere an dltfermt a'qt b tl•
q•. rho meaagn We Ctrfs- turace air ork. Altbou D Arne qt•
puDUC to protects n aryoratd ero ottia /rs earnun e m r g
cod pnratsy erysd afros. `Art Public an tLO an. lntlude pubtie an Ida devdopmeat
nests ~ sense of bbbry,` Bald
L1rl WonD; We dry'e cantor for p~•eWuba~dtargedevelop
K tts lets Wet are used for puDUc'
' atary0'MeUa,e74ysarolEsa¢- art army mmmtmltla rely m
ntar~~, Wd pubUc an b Imponaat gnau or.ptlratc mntrfDutlotu
'It's great and ve mottlE pave ~ PubUc in W We suburbs. Ukt
mmt of It W We pub,` ape sa14 s amtnrk 1o D!t prin. raa/n from
aelghg q' a large radwoodahd• We We and tradlUOaal b Ws bi•
copper sculpture W A'alnut sane and obscure. It grace part.
Qaet's Hrbu Farm Pall ~t
mate We 6aUy avaU more faur• - !
eat
+t