Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-01-15 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 1991 7:30 P.M. REVISED AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Ordinance No. 42, Series of 1990, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.28 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to expand, strengthen, and clarify code provisions relating to air pollution control. Applicant: Town of Vail. STAFF WILL REQUEST THIS ORDINANCE TO BE TABLED TO THE FEBRUARY 5, 1991 EVENING MEETING. 3. Fireplace Ordinance - Discussion of proposed changes to Ordinance 42 as proposed during first reading. 4. Resolution No. 25, Series of 1990, a resolution declaring the need for a Housing Authority to function in the Town of Vail, Colorado. 5. Letter to the Division of Wildlife concerning trapping in the Vail Valley. 6. Adjournment. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY JANUARY 15, 1991 7:30 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 ~ 2. Ordinance No. 42, Series of 1990, second reading, an Kristan Pritz ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.28 of the Susan Scanlan Municipal Code of the Town of Uail to expand, strengthen, and clarify code provisions relating to air pollution control. Applicant: Town of Vail. STAFF WILL REQUEST THIS ORDINANCE TO BE TABLED TO THE FEBRUARY 5, 1991 EVENING MEETING. 7:40 3. Public discussion of the Proposed Amendments to Ordinance 42 Susan Scanlan relating to fireplaces. Action Requested of Council: Give staff direction as to the changes to be made to the ordinance so it can be redrafted for second reading. Also, solicit public input on the proposed ordinance changes to create a well-rounded progressive ordinance. Background Rationale: Council had initially agreed upon a fee for fireplaces in all new construction, but would also like to include a deadline for complete conversion of all woodburning units to gas or removal of the waodburning unit. These ideas currently are not in the first ordinance and will be discussed with the public. Staff Recommendation: Provide recommendations for progressive measures which will address the fireplace issue and best serve the needs of the community now and into the future. 9:00 4. Resolution No. 25, Series of 1990, a resolution declaring Kristan Pritz the need for a Housing Authority to function in the Town of Vail, Colorado. Discussion of staff research on Housing Authority/Non-profit corporation approaches to providing Affordable Housing in the Town of Vail. Background Rationale: The Council requested that staff research the pros and cons of a Housing Authority and also develop a recommendation on how to approach the construction of affordable housing on the Mountain Bell site and/or Town Shop site. 10:00. 5. Letter to the Department of Wildlife concerning trapping in Ken Hughey the Vail Valley. Action Requested of Council: Support the staff recommendation as contained in the letter to the Division of Wildlife from the mayor. Background Rationale: Recent trapping incidents in the Vail Valley have prompted citizen concerns relating to Division of Wildlife trapping regulations in the Valley. The Town Council has, therefore, requested staff to draft a letter of proposed changes. Staff Recommendation: Ban trapping from ridgeline to ridgeline contiguous with the Town of Vail town limits plus half mile east and west of the current boundaries. 10:15 6. Adjournment • s -TO: Vail Town Council .-FROM: Community Development Department _ DATE: January 15, 1991 SUBJECT: Ordinance 42 - Discussion of Air Quality/Fireplace Ordinance and the Proposed Revisions discussed during First Reading of the Ordinance. I. BACRGROUND ON lnr: ORDINANCE: " On December 18, 1990, Ordinance 42 was presented to the - Town Council for first reading. The principal components . or changes to the existing ordinance as presented relate to three major areas; new construction, restricted units and combination of units. The major points for each are outlined below: A. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL (1) In new construction there are two possibilities: (a) One woodburning unit is allowed and may be either a woodburning fireplace or a Colorado certified clean burning unit. If a woodburning unit is installed, up to three gas appliances may also be installed. OR (b) Up to three gas log fireplaces may be constructed. The additional provision for up to three gas appliances would also apply in this instance. These provisions apply to all zone districts equitably with no differentiation between low density zone districts and higher density zone districts, except for those areas specifically addressed; i.e. restricted units and accommodation units. • (2) A restricted unit, which. is any unit in a primary/ - - ~ - secondary, duplex, single family zone, or hillside residential zone district which cannot be subdivided or - sold separately, shall no longer be allowed to have any ~ , ~ - ~ woodburning units. The ordinance would allow one gas log " - fireplace and up to two gas appliances per restricted unit. - (3) When units are remodeled; i.e. combined into one - dwelling unit, all existing woodburning units except one must be removed or made inaccessible. Three gas appliances - ~ ~ are also allowed. The owner could also choose option lb. • ~ The intent is to treat the combined units as one dwelling unit. B. REVISED PROPOSAL On December 18, 1990, the Council reviewed the ordinance and there was general consensus that the provisions of the :ordinance were not progressive enough. Some members favored prohibiting woodburning completely in new construction. After discussion, the Council proposed a compromise solution. The suggestions for changes to the ordinance include the following: (1) Allow only one woodburning fireplace or certified . woodstove per unit in new construction, but assess a one time fee of $10,000.00 to allow the installation of that woodburning unit. _ (2) The money raised from the $10,000.00 fee program would - be used to fund a rebate program to encourage conversion of existing woodburning units to gas. (3) The rebate program would be developed whereby up to 30% • to 40% of the cost of conversion would be refundable with a ceiling of $1,000.00 or a possible rebate of $300.00 to $400.00 per conversion. (4) Sales tax collected from the sale of firewood within the Town of Vail would be earmarked to help fund conversion to gas. . During the evening meeting on January 8, 1991, the Council requested the staff to explore the logistics involved in requiring a complete conversion of all woodburning fireplaces within a specified time period. (5) Consideration of a complete ban on woodburning in the Town of Vail within a specified time period would require conversion to gas or removal of wocdburning units if conversion was not desired. ~ The staff recommendation for such a time period would be a 3 year period from the time a program to require the conversion is developed. II. FURTHER DISCUSSION: - Before the language of Ordinance 42 is changed to reflect • these changes, staff feels it is appropriate to allow for . more public input on the changes to determine c~,u.uunity direction on the issue. If the revised proposal reflects the consensus of Council opinion the following additional topics need to be discussed: (a) Should the rebate funds created be available to those ~ conversions completed before the effective date of this . ordinance? Staff recommendation is to make the rebate funds available for those conversions occurring after the effective date of the ordinance. y . (b) Should equal consideration for rebate funds be given to commercial vs. residential conversion? Staff sees the commercial properties as those which are _ rented on a short term or nightly basis and may have .significantly more disposable income available than someone diving full time in a home in Town. Staff suggests there = may be some merit to a program which would place greater emphasis on the residential conversion and provide financial support to someone to whom conversion poses a financial hardship. . (c) Will rebate funds, if available, be distributed on a first come first serve basis or some other criteria? Staff recommendation would be to support a first come first serve program to provide incentive for expedient conversion. A. GAS CONVERSION COSTS & AVAILABILITY Information provided by Gary Hall of the Public Service . Company indicates that the average cost of conversion from woodburning fireplaces to gas is approximately $600.00. The price for conversion can range from $400 to $1,200 depending on the amount of gas piping which has to be installed and whether or not additional meters need to be set. He indicated the log sets cost approximately $300 to $400 each. When questioned about the availability of natural gas to properties in Vail he related that gas lines are provided in all of the streets in the Town of Vail and as a result conversion could occur on all properties. There will be some additional reinforcing of scme of the lines occurring - this summer. He indicated that Public Service would be able to handle the loads created by a complete conversion - to gas of all existing woodburning units. B. OTHER COMMUNITY CONVERSION PROGR.z1MS A review of preliminary research done for. the development of the fireplace ordinance indicates that there are no other communities which have required complete conversion ~ of all woodburning fireplaces and woodstoves. Staff has included copies of that preliminary research for your review. . _ Staff has had further contact with Steamboat Springs to elucidate the parameters of their current conversion - program. In Steamboat Springs, single family and duplex residences are exempt from the requirements for conversion. Single family and duplex properties are still permitted to have one woodburning fireplace per unit. Multi-family properties are no longer permitted to have open burning fireplaces. The Steamboat staff has some question as to whether this is a legally defensible position. In multi-family projects, fireplaces and non-conforming woodstoves must be changed out to a Colorado Phase I of II woodstove or insert, converted to natural gas or rendered _ inoperable by welding the damper shut. The recommendation from their staff would be to prohibit the retrofiting of existing stoves and requiring change out to non-catalytic _ Phase II stoves. This would remove to a certain extent the operator error and problems created by low maintenance of the catalytic units. The conversion is based upon a registration program for all " solid fuel units. The registration program has not been " completely successful due in part to being a mail-in registration program accomplishing only a 75$ participation rate, nor has there been any enforcement of the requirement. . They have experienced some problem with the buildup of carbon monoxide in the units when fireplaces have been . - converted to gas logs and recommend that the gas burning " appliances be used instead. The use of the gas appliances where fireplaces had previously been used have shown up to . a 40% decrease in electric bills where electricity is the primary heat source. Mike Zopf, t.~e Steamboat contact, indicated that the gas appliances have been well received . by the local real estate and prope~y management companies. . III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff at this time would request that Council consider public input and direct staff on desired changes to the ordinance prior to a formal second reading of the ordinance. The staff feels this is necessary to insure that the decisions made and the policy developed is progressive and proactive. This approach will best serve the needs of the community now and into the future. If Council wants staff to develop a program to require . complete conversion of all woodburning. units in Town it would involve a number of steps. . (1) A complete inventory of all woodburning units in Town would need to be completed. To be most effective this would require a door to door inventory of all units and in staff's opinion would require approximately six months. (2) Staff would suggest a three year time period to require complete conversion or removal of woodburning units. At this time a suggested deadline for conversion would be June " 1, 1994. _ (3) Staff would suggest the implementation of a rebate program to encourage early conversion of woodburning units in a program similar to that which was implemented in - Telluride. 1st year conversion: 50$ rebate 2nd year conversion: 25$ rebate 3rd year conversion: 10$ rebate In this instance a ceiling limit should also be placed for the total allowable cost which the Town would consider for rebate. In a plan similar to that proposed during the fee per fireplace discussion, staff would suggest a $1,000 limit. (4) Since permits would be required to insure safe and proper conversions, the progress of the program could be tracked via plumbing inspections. As in the original - - proposal, staff recommends that building permit fees be waived for conversion. (5) A fund base for the rebate program would need to be established. Staff feels there is an inherent conflict between the two proposals suggested by Council. If there is going to be a complete ban on woodburning in the Town of Vail by June of 1994, it does not seem appropriate to allow for the additional construction of woodburning fireplaces at this time. As a result there would be no conversion fund created by the fee per fireplace idea. A possible source of funds for the rebate program would be the real estate transfer tax. (6) An alternate idea to the rebate program is not to provide financial incentives for conversion, but rather to impose penalties for failing to do so. Staff feels that in order to insure compliance with the conversion schedule there would be a need to create a fee structure for fines to be imposed for failing to convert. This should be a significant penalty charged on a per day,' per week or per month basis such that failure to convert could create a _ financial hardship for those who do not convert by June 1, 1994. (7) Staff feels that the terms of a conversion program would by necessity apply to all woodburning units within . the Town and careful consideration should be given to allowing any variances. Staff recommendation would be not to allow any variances and thereby require a complete, across the board conversion. ~~.r`~.:-- B. Communities with ReQUlations in glace: 1. Castle Rock, Colorado Elevation: 6,500 ft. Population: 8,500 residents Geography: Gently rolling area with a few ridges, hills. The City of Castle Rock has been determined to be a part of the Denver metro area air shed although they are located 25 miles south of the city. Based on the air studies conducted in the metro area and the support of several council members, it was determined to take strong action to limit the increased deterioration of the air quality in - the Plum Creek Basin. Effective December 31, 1989 the City of Castle Rock prohibited the construction of any new solid fuel burning devices. At present the ordinance allows only for the installation of gas appliances--no installation of any type of unit which can be converted to solid fuel burning. The ordinance does not allow for the installation of "clean-burning" stoves, but does have a provision which will allow for review of the Phase III stove technology when it becomes available. The limits were imposed when Castle Rock had approximately 3500 units constructed of a possible 50,000 dwelling units. The ordinance was devised as a result of the visible particulate pollution. It was felt that wood burning was a major cause of the pollution and as a result was the only contributor dealt with for reduction/control of the 'pollution problem. Castle Rock does not currently sample for PM10, but feels the state may run some monitors in their area. At last report the city is in compliance with state and federal air quality limits. 2. Crested Butte, Colorado Elevation: 8,888 ft. Population: 1,000 full time residents % Geography: Town located at the upper end of the East River Valley. The valley is very narrow and surrounded on 3 sides by mountains. 4 ' Crested Butte was in a rather unique position several year ago~to receive help with their air quality situation from the Wood Heating Alliance. In an effort to alleviate the visual effect on the air in the Town of Crested Butte, an ordinance was developed where by all solid fuel burning units had to be replaced over a 3 year period with either gas appliances, certified wood stoves or fireplace inserts or removed altogether. Given the 3 year compliance period, 95~ of those who complied did so within the last 30 days of the time frame. According to Bill Cranke, 25~ of the units are still not in compliance. A cooperative effort was made with the Wood Heating Alliance to offer stoves and inserts at wholesale prices. This still involved an expenditure on the part of residents of $1000- $2000 for the units. This created ill feeling on the part of some residents, but prior to any implementation of the program or ordinance, a survey was done to gather a feel for people's perception of the air quality problem. 86$ of those surveyed felt there was a problem and were willing to do something about it. The decision to implement the ordinance was based on past TSP (total suspended particulate) violations, but no additional studies had been completed to determine source apportionment of contributing sources of particulates. PM10 monitoring is ongoing with Crested Butte currently being in compliance with state and federal emission standards. A reduction in the visibility problem has been achieved and an approximate reduction of 80-90~ in emissions. Their staff recommended requiring non-catalytic stoves and cautions against problems related to retrofitting or changing old units. 3. Breckenridge, Colorado Elevation: 9,600 ft. Population: 1,396 year round residents; 18,860 peak season population Geography: A fairly narrow valley located east of the 10 mile mountain range. 5 Although Breckenridge has not done extensive monitoring or studying of their emissions picture, - their Planning Commission and political entities made the move to place limitations on the number of solid fuel burning devices in their jurisdiction. This was brought about by a desire not to have the air quality problems seen in other mountain communities. They took the steps to initiate their present ordinance because of the visual impacts created in other communities by the development of large multi-family developments. There is a significant potential for Breckenridge to expand by the construction of large multi- family developments. . The response to the ordinance has been very favorable and has received the support of the elected officials. Although there is a variance process incorporated into the ordinance, no variances have been granted. The original ordinance was drafted by the Planning Commission and made more restrictive by the Town Council. The original ordinance has been in place for over 5 years, but the current restrictions were imposed as the result of revisions to the Development Code in the summer of 1988. ' The ordinance permits one woodburning appliance per dwelling unit for single family residential, unless larger than 4,000 sq. ft. in which case there may be 2. In duplex or townhouse residential if units are 1,500 sq. ft. or larger they may have one appliance per unit. If the units are smaller than 1,500 sq. ft. of internal heated floor area, they are not allowed a wood burning appliance. The ordinance was based on square footage as a means to set limits without scientific basis. It was a fairly arbitrarily drawn point of reference. In multi-unit residential buildings, one . woodburning appliance is allowed in the lobby area if over 1,000 sq. ft. in site. No woodburning appliances are allowed in dwelling units. If development occurs which would wish to provide additional fireplaces to those which are permitted they may do so by the use of gas, electricity or similar means. 6 ` 4. Telluride, Colorado Elevation: 8,745 ft. Population: 1,300 year round residents. Geography: Box canyon The city is located in a valley surrounded on~4 sides by mountains. During the late summer/early fall of 1985, the Town of Telluride initiated a registration program for all solid fuel burning devices and issued permits for the registered units. The ordinance also called for the prohibition of construction of new solid fuel burning devices unless they met strict emissions standards and permitted only one - per unit--no open burning fireplaces are permitted unless they are located on restaurants, bars or commercial lobbies. The ordinance also incorporated a rebate program over a 3 year period to encourage people to install alternate forms of heat or to upgrade their existing wood burners. All open fireplaces in residential units had to be equipped with fireplace inserts. The rebate program was funded through the town's real estate transfer tax and offered: 1st & 2nd year $750 for alternate form of heat $200 for certified woodburning unit 3rd year $250 for alternate form of heat $100 for certified woodburning unit These actions were taken in Telluride based on the supposition that Telluride would be in violation of PM10 standards based on historical TSP data. However, no professional air quality comprehensive study was completed before the ordinance was enacted. There was also a great deal of visual evidence supporting the premise of an air quality problem. The Town of Telluride continues to do PM10 monitoring today and is currently in compliance with state and federal standards. The public was generally unhappy with the ordinance and registration program when it was initially introduced. There was one lawsuit against the Town which was dismissed and talk of a citizens initiative to change the parameters of the ordinance, but it never got off the ground. At this time, they have achieved compliance with a solid fuel burning units. 7 5. Steamboat Springs, Colorado Elevation: 6,700 ft. Population: 6,300 people year round. Geography: A wide valley with rolling mountains on two sides. In early 1987 the town of Steamboat Springs passed an ordinance which required the registration of all solid fuel burning devices within a 6 month period of final passage of the ordinance. Reports from the planning office and environmental health office indicate that the registration program has not been overly successful. The lack of success is based on the mail-out type of registration they conducted--not a great deal of return of surveys. The ordinance placed limitations on the number of solid fuel burning devices allowed in residential units. In single family, duplex and two family homes one solid fuel burning advice is allowed per dwelling unit. In multi-family buildings, there is a limitation of one approved solid fuel burning device allowed per building. The ordinance also required the elimination of non-conforming solid fuel burning devices in existing dwelling units and specified time frames for completion of this project. The non- conforming.units had to be eliminated, but could be replaced with approved solid fuel devices. The ordinance also requires the elimination of solid fuel burning devices which are non-conforming in commercial buildings and permits the installation of only one approved device per building after the effective date of the ordinance. The controls were imposed and developed as the result of an air quality advisory committee. The basis for the initial control measures was a public perception that there was an air quality problem. Steamboat Springs has historically violated TSP limits and has recently-winter '89- '90--violated PM10 limits. The committee in Steamboat is reorganizing to address the issue of number of units in multi-family buildings and also the issue of retrofitting existing units. , Public response to control measures for future construction has been great. 8 ~ . '4:. .:a.- ~ . . , r ~ 6. ~ Aspen", Colorado Y Elevation: 7,928-ft. Population: 12,000 year round permanent residents. Geography: Narrow valley with 10,000+ feet " peaks on 3 sides of the valley. The valley floor is approximately 1/2 mile wide in town. " Aspen has been regulating solid fuel devices since as early as 1973 when the Colorado Department of Health recommended a moratorium against the construction of fireplaces in condominiums and lodges. The first law in 1977, allowed unlimited woodstoves,and one fireplace for single family dwellings. In multi-family developments the units had to be over 3,500 sq. ft. to allow separate fireplaces. This 1977 law also allowed for the construction of only one fireplace in the lobby for hotels and motels. In 1983 the 1977 law was modified to require that all stoves installed were certified units. In 1986, the law was further modified to allow the installation of one fireplace or one certified stove per multi-family building. The`most recent revision to the ordinance applies to the metro' area which encompasses most of Pitkin County." The" current ordinance allows for the installation of~ one gas log fireplace with a provision for a second device if it is a gas log fireplace or certified stove. This provision is allowed per building and prohibits the installation in individual condos. The ordinance also allows for the installation of an unlimited number of gas appliances per building. As a part of this 1988 ordinance there was also a registration program required which to date has registered 5,200 of 5,500 property owners. The metro area ordinance no longer allows for the construction of wood burning fireplaces unless they are equipped with gas logs. This type of ordinance has been well received by the general public as it relates to new construction or individuals doing additional work to units and does not require removal of existing wood fireplaces as was initially proposed. 9 . s Aspen is designated as a Group I PM10 area. In other words, they have violated PM10 standards and have been required to develop a local implementation plan to bring the community within PM10 limits. Aspen has based their ordinances over the years on results of emissions inventories and updates conducted in 1977,••1982 and 1987. The ordinance developed in 1988 was the product of the emissions inventory and some computer modeling done by the Colorado Department of Health. Aspen has done CMB sampling for the past 2~seasons in conjunction with the State Health Department, but` have no results to date. They did purchase meteorological gear to enable them to predict high pollution days and announce no burn alerts, but equipment failure has prevented any alerts. III. CURRENT VAIL ORDINANCE A great deal of the research and studies which have been conducted have been to allow for the well informed development of an overall air quality plan. The plan would address Vail's air quality on a long term basis and encompass a number of different factors which contribute to the overall air quality. In addition to the overall plan the staff would like to recommend changes and revisions to existing fireplace ordinances. These changes would address some of the issues which have been raised related to fireplaces and the current ordinances. The initial purpose for the original fireplace ordinance and the purpose of the proposed recommendations is to protect the air quality of the valley and to reduce the amount of particulate pollution introduced into the air. Each of these recommendations will result in no net increase in the amount of particulate pollution and may result in a decrease by eliminating some particulate. The staff recommendations are: A. Include a provision to the existing ordinance to allow- for the construction of 2 masonry fireplaces for the • installation of gas logs in new residential dwelling C units. If the fireplaces are constructed under this ~ provision of the ordinance, the owner will forfeit the G,'- right to burn wood in either fireplace. This provision would also allow for the installation of one gas , appliance. 10 - .y ORDINANCE NO. 42 Series of 1990 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 8.28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL TO EXPAND, STRENGTHEN, AND CLARIFY CODE PROVISIONS RELATING TO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL. WHEREAS, the setting of the Town of Vail in a valley between two mountains restricts air movement through the valley; WHEREAS, the movement of air through the Gore Valley is further restricted in cold times of the year thereby causing the increased buildup of pollutants in the air caused by solid fuel burning devices; WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the pollution caused by solid fuel burning devices is exacerbated by the altitude, topography, climate and meteorology of the Town of Vail; WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that these sources of air pollution may be minimized by existing, practical and economical technologies; WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that is necessary to encourage environmentally beneficial technologies to prevent further degradation of the air quality of the Vail Valley; WHEREAS, the Town Council considers visually clean air to be an irreplaceable asset enjoyed by guests and residents of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT; Section 1. The Vail Municipal Code Chapter 8.28 "Air Pollution Control" be repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 8.28.010 Purbose and Applicability These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and general welfare of the residents and visitors in the Town of Vail. These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1 1) To protect the air quality in the Town of Vail; 2) To reverse the continuing trend toward increased air degradation in the Town of Vail; 3) To provide heat sources that are efficient and have a reduced polluting effect; 4) And to generally protect the air for the purpose of the public's overall health, safety and welfare. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all areas of the Town of Vail. 8.28.020 Definitions 1) Solid Fuel Burning Device: shall mean any fireplace, stove, firebox or device intended and/or used for the purpose of burning wood, pulp, paper or other non-liquid or non-gaseous fuel. 2) Certified Solid Fuel Burning Device: shall mean a solid fuel burning device which is certified by the Air Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health to meet the Emissions Standards set forth in Section IV of Regulation No. 4 of Volume I of Colorado Air Quality Control Commission. 3) Fireplace: shall mean an open hearth or fire chamber or similar prepared place in which a fire may be made and which is built in conjunction with a chimney. 4) Gas Appliance: shall mean a fully self-contained, U.L. listed and A.G.A. "fireplace" unit which does not require venting through a chimney and which does not permit the use of solid fuel. 5) Gas Loq: shall mean an A.G.A. and U.L. listed artificial log unit which is approved for the burning of natural gas and must be placed within a fireplace as previously defined. 6) Dwelling unit: means any room or group of rooms in a two-family or multiple-family building with kitchen facilities designed for or used by one family as an independent housekeeping unit. 7) Accommodation unit: means any room or group of rooms 2 without kitchen facilities designed for or adapted to occupancy by guests and accessible from common corridors, walks, or balconies without passing through another accommodation unit or dwelling unit. 8) Refuse: means all solid wastes, garbage and rubbish, whether combustible or noncombustible, including rubble. 9) Restricted Unit: means any unit in a primary/secondary duplex or single family zone district which cannot be subdivided or sold separately. 8.28.030 Solid Fuel Burning Devices No solid fuel burning device shall be permitted within the Town of Vail unless it complies with the following provisions: 1) With the exception of restricted units, each dwelling unit may have one solid fuel burning device or one certified fuel burning device per unit. No solid fuel burning device shall be permitted in restricted units. 2) Hotels, motels, inns or lodges shall have no more than one solid fuel burning device for each lobby contained therein. Solid fuel burning devices shall not be permitted in accommodation units or dwelling units within hotels, motels, inns or lodges. 3) Restaurants or bars shall have no more than one solid fuel burning device for each restaurant or each bar or each restaurant containing a bar. 4) All solid fuel burning devices shall be constructed, installed, maintained, and operated in such a manner that their operation will result in an increase in heating energy so that the heat supplied to the living area will be greater than that lost through air exchange during combustion. 8.28.040 Gas Fireplaces In addition to the solid fuel burning devices permitted by section 8.28.030 of this ordinance, gas fire places may be permitted within the Town of Vail which comply with the following restrictions: 3 1) Each dwelling unit with the exception of restricted units shall be entitled to three (3) or fewer gas fireplaces in accordance with the following conditions: a) If the dwelling unit contains no more than one (1) fireplace, the fireplace may be either for the installation and burning of gas logs or for the burning of wood. b) If the dwelling unit contains two or more fireplaces, then each fireplace shall be limited exclusively to the installation of gas logs. 2) Restricted units may contain no more than one gas log fireplace and shall not be permitted any wood burning fireplaces. 3) Each accommodation unit may contain one gas log fireplace. a) All gas fireplaces in accommodation units within the Town of Vail shall be subject to periodic inspection by the Town of Vail Environmental Health Officer. Prior to making any such inspection, the Environmental Health Officer shall give reasonable notice of such inspection to the owner of the property being inspected. The owner of commercial property containing any gas fireplace shall pay to the Town of Vail the amount of thirty dollars ($30.00) per year on the first day of the year following the year in which the gas fireplace was installed for each such fireplace, and the first day of each year thereafter during the time the gas fireplace remains within the property. The owner of the property shall allow the Town of Vail Environmental Health Officer sufficient access to the property for the purposes of doing such an inspection. b) All gas fireplaces in accommodation units within the Town of Vail shall be constructed in such a manner that access to the firebox is prohibited except for the purposes of repair and maintenance. A sign shall be placed on the gas fireplace reading: "Caution - Gas Fireplace Only". 4 8.28.050 Gas Appliances In addition to solid fuel burning devices permitted by Section 8.28.030 and fireplaces permitted by Section 8.28.040 of this ordinance, gas appliances may be permitted which comply with the following restrictions: 1) Each dwelling unit may contain no more than three (3) gas appliances. 2) Restricted units may contain no more than two (2) gas appliances. 3) Accommodation units may contain no more than one gas appliance per unit. 8.28.060 Modification, Alteration or Remodel If one or more separate dwelling units are combined to form one larger dwelling unit, regardless of the number of dwelling units previously contained in each separate dwelling unit, the newly formed unit shall comply in all respects with the terms, conditions, provisions, and restrictions of this ordinance. 8.28.070 Coal Usaae Prohibited The burning of coal within the Town of Vail is prohibited. 8.28.080 Refuse Burnina Prohibited The burning of refuse in any solid fuel burning device within the Town of Vail is prohibited. 8.28.090 Permit Reauirements A building permit shall be required for the installation of any solid fuel burning device, certified solid fuel burning device, fireplace, gas appliance or gas log. To encourage the conversion of wood burning and solid fuel devices to gas logs and gas appliances, all applicable building permit fees for such conversion shall be waived by the Town of Vail. 8.28.100 Penalties It is unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Chapter or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any person performing any act prohibited or 5 declared to be unlawful by this Chapter or failing to perform an act required by or otherwise made mandatory by this Chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than four hundred ninety-nine dollars ($499). Any such person shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which a violation of any provision of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted by such person and shall be punished accordingly. In addition to penalties provided in this Section, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be deemed a public nuisance, and may be by this Town similarly abated as such, and each day that such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense. Section 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this Ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and inhabitants thereof. Section 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this Ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously 6 repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED ON FIRST READING THIS day of 1990, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Ordered published in full this day of 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk 7 r RESOLUTION N0. 25 Series of 1990 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NEED FOR A HOUSING AUTHORITY TO FUNCTION IN THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO. WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail by 25 residents, setting forth that there is a need for a Housing Authority to function within the Town, and a public hearing has been held upon due notice given by the Town Clerk, all in accordance to "The Housing Authority's Law" of the State of Colorado, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: The Town Council of the Town of .Vail hereby finds, determines, and declares that: 1. There is a lack of safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations in the Town of Vail, Colorado, available for all the inhabitants thereof; and 2. There is a need for a Housing Authority to function in the Town of Vail, Colorado; and 3. A petition setting forth the need for a Housing Authority to function in the Town of Vail, Colorado, has not been denied by the Town Council therein within three (3) months of the date of the filing of the petition; and 4. The Mayor of the Town of Vail, Colorado, is hereby notified of the adoption of this Resolution; and 5. The Mayor is directed to file in the Office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, a necessary certificate evidencing (the appointment of the Commissioners and designation of the first Chairman of the Housing Authority, pursuant to Section 29-4-205(3) of "The Housing Authority's Law" of the State of Colorado or (the designation of the Town Council as the Commissioners of the Housing Authority, pursuant to Section 29-4-205(2) of "The Housing Authority's Law" of the State of Colorado). (Strike the inapplicable option.) 6. The aforesaid conditions of the Town of Vail, Colorado, compel persons of low income to occupy unsafe or unsanitary dwelling accommodations or overcrowded and congested dwelling accommodations, and that these conditions cause an increase in the spread of disease and crime; that the clearance and reconstruction of areas in which unsanitary or unsafe housing conditions exist and the providing of safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations at rents which persons of low income can afford are public uses and purposes. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1990. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk The motion to adopt said Resolution was moved by and seconded by and upon roll call, the following voted: Ayes: Nays: Thereupon the Mayor declared said Resolution duly adopted and passed and the signed the same in approval thereof. The Mayor of the Town of Vail being present at the meeting, acknowledged notice of the adoption of the Resolution. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk -2- CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY OF OFFICE AND DATE, TIME, AND PLACE OF THE REGULAR TOWN COUNCIL MEETING I, Pamela A. Brandmeyer, the acting and qualified Clerk of the Town of Vail, Colorado, and as such, the keeper of the minutes of the actions and deliberations of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, does hereby certify at the time of the attached Resolution, the duly elected and qualified incumbents in office were: Kent Rose, Mayor Tom Steinberg, Mayor Pro-Tem Lynn Fritzlen Jim Gibson Merv Lapin Robert Levine Peggy Osterfoss I further certify that at the time of the adoption of the attached Resolution, the date, time, and place of the regular meeting of the Town Council was and is 7:30 p.m., the Town Council Chambers of the Municipal Offices of the Town of Vail, Colorado. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the Town of Vail, Colorado, this day of 1990. Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk _ towo of nail ~ 75 south frorrtage road vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2100 office of mayor January 11, 1991 Division of Wildlife Box 633 Minturn, Colorado 81645 Attn: Bill Andree Dear Bill: In light of three incidents in the fall of 1990 where wild animal/leghold traps caught domesticated dogs, trapping in the Vail Valley has become an issue of general public concern. The public's concern stems from the fact that the Vail Valley is a highly utilized year-round recreation area in a relatively concentrated amount of physical space. The recreational activities involved include, but are not limited to, hiking, climbing, snow skiing, mountain biking, etc. These activites occur not only within the limits of the Town of Vail, but extend onto nearby Federal lands outside the jurisdiction of the Town. It is felt that the current regulations on trapping are not in the best interests of our citizens and guests in that the mixed use of recreation and trapping are not compatible. In an effort to be sensitive and fair to all involved parties, we would like to suggest that current Division of Wildlife regulations be modified. The proposed changes would provide for a ban on trapping from ridgeline to ridgeline contiguous with the Town of Vail town limits, but extending 1/2 mile east and west of the current boundaries. We feel that this regulation would allow safe recreation in the Vail Valley, yet allow those interested in trapping to pursue their respective interests. We urge prompt attention to the issue so as to allow the decision to be reflected in upcoming revisions to printed materials as released by the Division of Wildlife. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ken Hughey, Assistant Town Manager, at (303) 479-2210. Your support and cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, TOWN OF VAIL Kent R. Rose Mayor n r`'r~ .,r 11 ~ TOWN OF VAIL ~ , 7S Soutb Frontage Road Offsce of the Tomn Manager Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100/FAX 303-479-2157 January 9, 1991 Mr. John Maldonado, Director Division of Housing 1313 Sherman Street, Room 518 Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Letter of Intent to Apply for CDBG Housing Grant Funds Dear John: Please let this letter serve as notice of the Town of Vail's intent to apply for CDBG housing grant funds for the development of affordable housing within the Town of Vail. ~ In 1990 the Eagle County Affordable Housing Task Force and the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments commissioned Rosall, Remmen and Cares, Inc. of Boulder Colorado to prepare The Eagle County Housing Needs Assessment report. The Town of Vail contributed substantial funding toward the preparation of this study. . In preparing the report, Rosall, Remmen and Cares distributed a _ survey to the different jurisdictions participating in the report. The information gathered through this survey process provided the base information for the Town of Vail Affordable Housing Study. In November of 1990 the Vail Town Council adopted the Town of Vail Affordable Housing Study. Since that time the Town of Vail Community Development Department and Town Council have been working toward implementing the policies contained in the study. These efforts include revising the pertinent sections of the Zoning Code and establishing an entity to oversee the development of affordable housing within the Town. There are currently two parcels of land which have been identified as appropriate for affordable housing development within the Town. The Town already holds title to the majority of the identified development sites. However, in one instance the acquisition of contiguous property maybe necessary in order to complete site assembly. In preliminary discussions with the Community Development Department staff, the owner of this tract of land has indicated a possible willingness to sell this parcel. The Town is requesting $300,000.00 in CDBG housing funds in order to complete this land assembly and/or to fund infrastructure costs. If the Town of Vail is successful in obtaining CDBG housing funds, the funds will be used to benefit those individuals who meet Eagle County's low to moderate income guidelines. If you have any questions or comments regarding this Letter of Intent to Apply for CDBG funds, please do not hesitate to contact Jill Kammerer or Kristan Pritz at (303) 479-2138. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, v- r Rondall Phillips Town Manager f • _ . I I~I:fIRUARY 1G, 1190 t•fAl'IPfUh1 INCOP1IsS FOR "LOW-INCOME" AND "MODT:RA7'T:-:LNCUPlI~:" IIOUSrIIOLDS in current ! 1990) dollars (to be used only for CDIIG projects funded under the 1988 and subsequent CDLiG Program Guidelines) 1etropolitan area Type of Ilouseho).d Size Ion-Metro County Aouspho],d 1-Person 2-Person 3-Person 4-Person 5-Person 6-Person 7-Person 8-Person ;LEAK CREEIC COUNTY Moderate Income 16500 18900 21250 23600 25100 26550 28050 29500 Low Incom10350 11800 13250 14750 15950 17100 18300 19450 ~ ~ :AGL,F. COUNT ~oderate Incti e 20800 23750 2G750 29700 31550 33400 35300 37150 o Income ~1300Q. 14850 1G700 18550. 20050 21500 23000 24500 ;ARFIELD COUNTY Moderate Income 19200 21950 24700 27450 29150 30900 32600 3.1300 Low Income 12000 13700 15450 17150 18500 19900 21250 22650 aRAND COUNTY Moderate Income 18500 21100 23700 26400 .28050 29700 31400 33000 Low Income 12100 13850 15550 17300 18700 20050 21450 22850 JACKSON COUNTY. Moderate Income 15900 18150 20450 22700 24100 25550 27000 28.100 Low Income 12100 13850 15550 17300 18700 20050 21450 22850 , LAKE COUNTY Moderate Income 16900 19350 21750 24150 25650 27200 28700 30200 Low Income 10550 12100 13f,00 15100 16300 17500 18700 19950 MOFrAT COUNTY Moderate Income 20250 23100 26000 28900 30700 32500 34350 3G150 Low Income 12G50 14450 1G250 18050 19500 20950 22400 23850 PITKIN COUNTY Moderate Income 22500 25?00 2$950 32150 34150 .3G150 38200 40200 Low Income 14050 1G100 18100 20100 21700 23300 24900 26550 ROUTT COUNTY Moderate Income 21950 25100 28200 31350 33300 35250 37250 39200 Low Income ]3700 15700 17650 ]9600 21150 22750 24300 25850 SUMMIT COUNTY Moderate Income 22700 25900 29150 32400 311400 3G450 38500 40500 Low Income 14200 1G200 18200 20250 21850 23500 25100 26750 i ; il~U i~ . NORTHWEST COLORADO C COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Post Office Box 739 'Frisco, Colorado 80443 'Frisco 303 668-5445 'Denver Direct 303 573-7611 'FAX 303 668-5326 - January 7, 1991 Shelly Mello Town of Vail , 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 - Dear Shelly, Thank you for your application for Community Development . Technical Assistance. The. Northwest Colorado Council of , Governments (NWCCOG) Board has reviewed the many applications submitted. We are pleased to inform you that the Vail - Fundraising Assistance .f.or. ]:0th Mountain Division Sculpture application has been accepted as a 1991 NWCCOG Community Development Project. The project assistance to be provided, simply defined is as follows: create a fundraising plan; write and package an NEA grant. • • Barb Keller, NWCCOG's Community Development Director, will be contacting your staff within the next thirty to sixty days to design a work program contract-and plan a time frame for completion. The project will be initiated no later than June 1991 and should-be completed by December 31, 1991. - The NWCCOG Board made the decision to select community development projects through an application for the first time this year. We think .this annual selection process will allow NWCCOG to more effectively assess and meet your community • development needs. Barb Keller is also available to you and your community for - assistance with impact assistance and community development block . grants as well as data and resource assistance. • We look forward to working with you in 1991. - Sincerely, • Paul Ohri Chairman - Eagle County: Avon, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minturn, Red Cliff, Vail, ' Grand County: Fraser, Granby, Grand Lake, Hot Sulphur Springs, Kremmling, Winter Park, 'Jackson County: Walden, ' Pitkin County: Aspen, Snowmass Vlilage, ' Routt County: Hayden, Ook Creek, Steamboat Springs, Yampa, ' Summit County: Blue River, Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Montezuma, Silverthorne . (/a~~l l~~ . ~1 ~~l Q~ . - , , ~ - • . • • t~ New art ~ec.e.a.dded p owns ubl~c~ collection t : _ p I Daily staff tepaat - ,~1 . Vail added another piece of public art to its collection Tuesday, bringing the total cost of pieces donated to the town in 1990 W ~ $90,000. The Vail Art in Public Places board accepted "Rocky Mountain ~ Majesty" by artist Stephen LeBlanc in mid December. Tuesday, the Vail t Town Council upheld that decision. 'x , The piece was donated to the ~ ~ I- ~ G ` ` town by Doug McLaughlin in ~1 . , memory of his brother Doug. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ Vail Town Planner Shelly Mello ~ said this was the third piece of art R;. 11 that was tom letel or artia P Y P Y donated to the town. "ICaikoo III" was donated. to the town in Sep- k= tember by David Chatkin, president of General Purpose Steel Inc., of ~ ~ Pittsburg. That sculpture stands at :aa.~ ~ the western edge of the Lionshead ~ ~,a~ti_-,,. ~ Parking Structure. - ~ ~ The town acquired the "Blue F ~ „ r r Bird of Paradise" by artist Michael ~ ~ Y Anderson in March. Mello said that sculpture was only partially donated to the town. All three sculptures total $90,000 ~ in donations to the town, she said.. ~ - Rocky Mountain Majesty.. a s....,~..r.,~,:~:: t _ , , bronze sculpture of a Rocky - viii Daily / scoff Martin Mountain Bighorn. Sheep, will be The Vail Art in Public Places board accepted 'Rocky Mountain displayed in fountain plaza of the Majesty' by artist Stephen LeBlanc in mid December. Tuesday, Lionshead Mall, Mello said. the Vail Town Council upheld that decision. 1~_ Ski invitational com ~~nes :.r sports, food .and wine = The .Infiniti 2nd Annual Con _ ~y noisseur Ski Invitational, a gotumet ` - ~ - sid event, begins Saturday in Vail. The ski intivational is designed to bring together award-winning --'r" ~ ` wineries and _ world class tes- ~ taurateurs fav a week-end of fine x ; ' dining. wine tasting events and ski z ~ ~*y racing. « to , ,~C The remier and "'R. ~ y d. P wits tasting ~.~-i_ , dinner event, "The Connoisseur . ~ Evening," ey,,...,,:,,d by Infiniti and , . ~ ;i?..~ 'i`+-;. ~ . i Ski Magaune, will feature the culi- ~ = ' . ~ nary talents oC Bradley Ogden, ~ . _ renowned Bay -Area chef, who r; e ~ . gained his reputation at Campton ` ~ ~ Place in San Francisco and now -,e,; r - , oversees the Lark Creek Inn . in ~ ~~Pur, California. He will com- ~ - --.G-, bine his talents with Hyatt Regency .~s`^----- ` , Beaver Creek chef, Rene Weiler, to ~ - produce hors d'oeuvres and an in- ~ ; - no~ative dinner menu that will + compliment the wines which will ~ ~ . be served throughout the evening. ~ - On Monday. the connoisseur ~ ~ - evening will begin in Village Hall . ~ ~ ~ -1 at 7 p.m. with a wine tasting recep- , Lion. Guests will be tree to taste wines provided by eight wineries, - including Ca del Bosco of Italy; ~ Rosemount Estate of Australia, and • . ~ , - . - a: - .,,,r- . P>r~e r« corradsrsrrpage to Bradley Ogden is the chef for the inflniti 2nd Annual Connoiseur ` Ski Invitational, a gourmet ski event. -Y? _ ' a - - _ ~ - _ - . E... _ - ~ i .Page t4 - Vill Dilty Friday, January 11, 7991 - - - ~ - - COnnOISSeUr which will also feature special er terminal will be set up to,._.,.,.,..t .event ~a-~connnumg txkbration of Tt{Tickets ;for `The ~Coouo ~ f -the ev s txt~aiea in dev~ Evetyng .rue. S75 a - - From page 13 w~s• images of the ,,.~,,...+ed Plexiglas _ y~1. ' ~ can be iaade by calling the _ proceeds 6om the eva?ing wt71 and neon moral that will be instal- public art txoiects. = ° - six American wineries -Charles benefit the Vail Valley Arts Council led at the east end of the t ;^rsti^~ After a successful first year event s~ w•-~:~:1 at 476255.. - ' Krug, Chateau Souverain Cellars, and the compkdon of the council's Parking Sttucttue this summer. in Squaw Valle : Via,; end include,the Winiti.Camoisseur ..Mark West, Pine Ridge, Trefethen Art In Public Places project, "Clip ~ The art council is c: ~r ;,.~_,.,g is dtpanding Ski Invitational Race. which will be with Infiniti, Sli lblagazine and areas thtonghou2 .the U.S.- this d at Gold Peak on Sunday. 1Vcnte Brothers. Guests wilt then Man." - _ - ' het _ - proceed a the gourmet. dinner. A table model and color comput- other ~r to make this annual aeason.:• . c . _ - r. = WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP 1/11/91 TOPIC .QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS n~~q 1 s€ ? 8/8/89 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN ANNEXATION LARRY: Proceeding w/legal requirements for Marijke Brofos will be circulating petitions when Larry request: Lapin) annexation. gets them to her. Larry is holding off so annexation will occur closer to end of next year for tax purposes. 5/1 AMEND CODE, 12.04.240, STREET CUT GREG/LARRY: Per Council direction, proceed. Proposed ordinance being redrafted after joint meeting with PERMITS Public Service and Holy Cross.. 7/17 BIKES/ROLLER BLADES AND SKATES/ KEN/LARRY: Should bicycles, roller blades, etc. be Researching appropriate ordinances for application to be SKATEBOARDS prohibited from highly pedestrianized areas in discussed in May, 1991. the Village and Lionshead, and also including the parking structures? 1/27 UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES IN LARRY/GREG: Work with Holy Cross Electric to Resolution adopted. District formation underway. There were EAST VAIL establish special improvement district(s) for no responses to the RFP sent to electric companies. undergrounding utilities in East Vail. Larry is discussing with Holy Cross and Greg. 9/20 LIONS RIDGE FILING 4 RON: Homeowners Assn. would like Town to buy Ron contacted Jim Fritze about tax abatement if Town takes common area for back taxes and penalties. ownership. Tax liability only about $5,500. County Attorney has not yet responded. 9/25 CHARGES FOR OUT-OF-TOWN DICK: Prepare updated figures based on actual cost Return to Council with system and implementation used by TOA. FIRE RESPONSE of fire response for unincorporated areas served Compute costs of UFD on total gross casts. Compute fee by Vail F.D. far ordinance amendment schedule for re-inspections. Allow eventual fee schedule consideration. to be adjusted on cost-of-living increases. In regard to equipment fee schedule, provide justifications on total cost of equipment (i.e., add in fire station, replacement of hoses, etc.). January 29, 1991. 9/25 EMPLOYEE HOUSING TOU staff committee studying employee housing has Staff committee is meeting, weekly. begun to review the following items: 1. Possible site recommendation and selection for Town staff focusing on Buzzard Park/Town Shops, and Mountain publicly held land suitable for seasonal Bell sites. , employees and long-term rentals. 2. GREG/JILL: RFP for structural engineering/ Underway. architectural/site analysis. , WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TOPIC _QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1/11/91 - Page ~ a` ~ - 9/25 EMPLOYEE ROUSTING CONTINUED 3. STEVE B.: funding and site analysis costs to b Cost estimate for Mtn. Bell site survey requested from Dan established. Corcoran. Kristen to speak w/Ron on cost approval & specifics to be included. 10/2 REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KRISTAN/GARY: Consider fees currently charged for Set for Work Session 2/6/91. To be discussed at interdepart- FEE STRUCTURE labor intensive review processes, "fast- mental mtg. Re: inclusion of actual costs from each dept. tracking," red tags, etc. Consider reinstating the street use tax? 11/27 HERITAGE CABLEVISION Ron: Schedule meeting ,with Ron/Larry/Lynn Johnson Will do. to discuss limited franchise agreement. 11/27 TA/TJ EVALUATIONS COUNCIL: Buck's evaluation is scheduled far Buck's review will be Tuesday, January 15. (request: Rose) January. 11/27 DIVISION OF WILDLIFE/TRAPS KEN: Find out exact regulation and boundary for Staff will review letter of request and make recommendations hunting in the Vail Valley, as established by to Council on January 15, 1991. Division of Wildlife. 12/11 CASH-IN-LIEU OF LAND LARRY/KRISTAN: Prepare ordinance. Ordinance will be prepared by February. DEDICATIONS/RE50J SCHOOL DISTRICT 12/11 CORNICE BUILDING PARKING KEN/GREG/KRISTAN: On-site parking is creating a They cannot park there and CD will enforce. (request: Steinberg) dangerous situation as cars back out onto Vail Valley Drive. 12/18 MILLRACE CONDO. ASSN. LETTER KRISTAN: Respond. Vail Ventures will respond in writing to our letter. 1/8/91 LONG-RANGE GOAL SETTING COUNCIL/STAFF:- Get ready! The Council long-range Will do. goal-setting session is set for 9:00 A.M. Tuesd y, February 26, 1991. Location to be announced. MARK YOUR CALDENDARS! 1/11/91 SNOW DUMP Ron/Greg: Workout site acquisition with UA. VA is meeting January 14, 1991, to discuss options. Complete design. 1/11/91 AGRICULTURE OPEN SPACE LAND KRISTAN: Locate all Agriculture open parcels. All located. There are approximately 12 pieces privately owned not including VA parcels. Does Council want to review those? 1/11/91 OLD TOWN SHOPS/HOLY CROSS LARRY/GREG: Environmental investigation. Contracts signed with Slosky & Associates. SITES