Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-02-19 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL RETREAT TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1991 9:00 A.M. Satch's Restaurant at the Clubhouse - the Ben Krueger Room AGENDA Town Council Long-Range Planning and Goal Setting VAIL TOWN COUNCIL RETREAT - LONG-RANGE GOAL SETTING SESSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1991 Satch's Restaurant at the Clubhouse - the Ben Krueger Room 9:00 A.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 8:30 Gathering - Continental Breakfast 9:00 Five Year Budget Presentation 9:30 Goal Setting Process 11:00 Goal Prioritization 12:00 Lunch 1:00 Meeting Procedure and Public Discourse 1. Robert's Rules of Order 2. Resolution No. 9, Series of 1990 3. Breckenridge Rules of Order 4. Proposed Town Council Participation Guidelines 1:45 Council's Role Is Council's role one of enforcement and regulation or facilitator? Free rein versus autocracy should be discussed. Regarding complaints, Council should be prepared to cite specific occurrences so everyone may understand the complaint. Are the issues cited "policy" issues with boards and staff when these entities are carrying out Council directives? Discuss the concept that "it used to be better because it was easier." Because construction was down 1984- 1988 and we have seen incredible construction increases in the past eighteen months to two years, the system has become deluged with processing applications. Does this account for some of the public frustration? How do we compare with other communities, such as Aspen? Can we do a better job through improved communications? (Comments gleaned from Council work sessions.) 2:45 Wrap-Up 3:00 Adjourn TOWN OF VAIL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT/PLANNING FIVE YEAR OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FORECAST AND STAFF FINANCIAL OPINION February 14, 1991 PURPOSE The broad purpose of this forecast is to estimate the level of revenues and expenditures for the Town of Vail through 1996 and thereby highlight potential funding problems and opportunities. This forecast should therefore be viewed as a planning tool for analyzing the Town's current and future financial situation and not as an attempt to set the exact level of future budgets or budget policy. Due to the interaction of the myriad of variables addressed in this forecast, it becomes progressively less reliable beyond the current year. Therefore, the five year budget forecast will be updated annually in order to continually monitor the trends affecting the Town's financial situation. METHODOLOGY This document is divided into four sections: Section I: Assumptions. Briefly outlines and justifies the major assumptions behind the forecast. Section II: Findings. Lists the significant findings of the forecast. Section III: Conclusions and Recommendations. Presents ~ staff opinion on the Town's current and future financial position. Section IV: The actual spreadsheets used to make the forecast. 1 SECTION I. ASSUMPTIONS Given the fact that accurately predicting the annual ups and downs of future years is a nearly impossible task, the estimates used in this report show a high degree of constancy. For example, even though annual sales tax increases are likely to vary considerably, this report is based upon the assumption of constant 5~ increases for the years 1992-1996. In this way the forecasts contained herein may be considered to be "plain vanilla" while the real world is likely to be another flavor altogether. Does this mean that the forecasts, being inherently inaccurate, are worthless? No. What it instead means is that the forecasts should be used to highlight and understand likely trends in the Town's future finances. That is, if the world behaves in a fashion reasonably consistent with our past experiences, the findings noted below in Section II, can be considered as reasonable expectations. The following items summarize the major assumptions included in this report. A. REVENUE 1. Sales Tax. The Town's sales tax revenue has increased at an average annual rate of 9.1~ from 1984-1990. An estimate of 5~ annual growth in future sales tax revenues is assumed. Sales Tax Growth History CONSUMER PRICE INDEX SALES TAX GROWTH REAL YEAR INCREASE OVER PREVIOUS YEAR GROWTH 1976 5.8$ 24.6 18.8 1977 6.5$ 8.3~ 1.8~ 1978 7.6~ 27.1 19.5$ 1979 11.3 22.3 11.0 1980 13.5 15.8 2.3$ 1981 10.3 16.6 6.3~ 1982 6.2~ 9.2$ 3.0$ 1983 3.2~ 9.1$ 5.9$ 1984 3.9~ 10.1$ 6.2$ 1985 3.8~ 7.2$* 3.4$ 1986 1.1$ 5.9$* 5.8$ 1987 4.4~ 8.3~ t 3.9$ 1988 4.4$ 8.9~ 4.5$ 1989 4.6$ 19.1$ 14.5 1990 (est) 6.1~ 4.3~ <1.8~> *Figures adjusted to correct for annexation issues regarding West Vail. 2 2. Property Tax. No increase in property tax revenues is assumed except for those increases due to new construction and the expected annexation of remaining Intermountain properties in 1991. 3. Ski Lift Tax. A 5$ growth rate is assumed. This is based upon a 2$ growth rate in skier numbers and 3$ annual price increases or some other combination of these factors. 4. Parking revenues are assumed to increase 7$ in 1992 and 5$ per year thereafter due to increased demand and minor rate increases. 5. Real Estate Transfer Tax revenues are assumed to average $1.2 million per year. This is slightly below the average tax receipts received since 1980. 6. An economic climate of moderate growth and 5~ inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPIj, has been assumed. 7. A sale or financing of part or all of the Berry Creek 5th Filing in order to raise $1 million for the General Fund has been assumed. B. EXPENDITURES 1. Many expenditure estimates in this study are driven by detailed plans for areas such as fleet replacement, capital improvements, street repair and maintenance, building repair and maintenance and employee compensation. 2. Salaries and wages, and all benefits except health insurance for current employees increased 3.8~ in 1988, 2.6~ in 1989, 5$ in 1990, and 6.7$ in 1991. An estimated 6~ increase in this item is used for 1992 and 1993 and 5$ thereafter. As the Colorado economy has begun to pull out of the very slow growth of recent years, we have experienced increased wage competition. 3. Health insurance premiums are expected to continue increasing at a rate substantially higher than the general inflation rate. A 16$ growth rate has been used in this study. Town employees are expected to share in paying for future health insurance increases. 4. New positions have been added at a rate of $30,000 per year. This assumption is based upon the necessity of meeting increased service demands. 3 e lea e ~a~ - r ~U e'~ea ayt a e beeU + GreaUle ~ d ,~l a ~Ua~e a a~, aaa 5 fl ar ~vfi as yc e erg' Abe ~U5 t5 to gt~ '~Y' r, aye i ~Lo~eG ~.,L oeea a~yo ~e a'~ a~ a~ `e-- ; . ~ • • 41~a ~r geo~ aye 5 a a5 _ fr ~ ~ C t, e~fi UU ~ } - ra~ ~a a 1996 • X0'4°~~ a to ~ e~'e~al ~ ~I ~ s ~ ~ 9g A~ ~ 1 met a55U ,one G ~ l • ~ ~ y ay r y5 yo t • • ~n~ a~,i° abet a~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ r u~ eG ee ~ 5 9ti el • az ba r~ 5yrg e ee Qe~ ~ lob ae 4 SECTION II. FINDINGS The following findings arise from the assumptions listed above. A. Four recent occurrences have combined to notably alter the outlook for the Town's financial condition in the next few years. • The budget for rebuilding and maintaining Vail's streets has increased by a total of $2.4 million for the years 1992-1996. • Over $500,000 of new General Fund services were included in the 1991 budget. • Sales tax revenue growth has decreased dramatically in recent months. Sales tax growth for the past six months was only 1.8$ versus an average of 9.1~ for the past seven years. Furthermore, the outlook for sales tax gains in 1991 are uncertain due to the national recession and the war. • The 1991 budget included lease/purchases for buses and land which have added over $300,000 to the 1992 and 1993 budgets. The effect of these four changes is that this budget projection now shows significant shortfalls in the capital budget for the years 1992-1994. Please see page eight for details. B. Approximately 75$-80$ of the Town's total revenue stream can be categorized as "elastic" revenue. That is, it varies in direct relation to the level of economic activity in town. This proportion of elastic revenue is considerably higher than is normally found in most American municipalities and has the effect of increasing the impacts (both positive and negative) of changes in the local economy. Given the assumptions of this study, the Town's reliance upon elastic revenue sources will continue to grow slightly each year. 5 SECTION III. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The high sales tax growth in past years has helped to create a very desirable financial situation for the Town of Vail. We have been able to increase General Fund Services, fund a major parking project, defease all outstanding Real Estate Transfer Tax warrants, and plan for early retirement of some of our existing debt without a tax increase. Furthermore, the Town has done an excellent job of funding the maintenance and replacement of its major capital assets and has been able to begin a program of park, landscaping, and recreation path improvements to meet the demands of residents. Now that the sales tax growth rate has slackened (hopefully only temporarily) we can no longer expect to increase service levels and capital expenditures through the painless process of relying upon sales tax revenue growth which continually outpaces inflation. It appears that we have followed that course as far as we can. From 1992 through 1995 it is likely that new services and capital expenditures will be possible only through reallocation of current resources and/or new revenue sources. RECOMMENDATION I The Town of Vail has not adjusted its property tax rate to account for inflation since 1985. This practice has resulted in a decrease in real dollar property taxes paid by Vail property owners of 27~ since 1985. Looked at another way, Vail property owners have been given a tax cut of $500,000 in 1991 due to this practice. The cumulative revenue loss to the Town of Vail since 1986 is nearly $1.4 million dollars and now continues to accrue at a rate of $500,000 per year. Town staff recommends that this practice be discontinued for the years 1992-1995. RECOMMENDATION II The latest cost increases in the Town's multi-year street reconstruction budget are likely to preclude the possibility of funding other needed capital maintenance and replacement items. Town staff recommends that the street reconstruction budget be decreased in the years 1992-1995 to a level more consistent with the Town's funding capabilities. 6 RECOMMENDATION III The current five year capital project list includes $460,000 per year for debt service on a new building to house the Vail Police Department. Given the current outlook for the Town of Vail's finances, Town staff recommends that the new Police building be paid for through a tax increase. 7 ~APSCBDI Revised: 2/15/1991 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROYEMEMT PROJECTS RfiQOIRED PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 CONDITIONS/COMMENTS 1. YTC Coeeunity Ioprovenents 563,000 2. Nilloa Bridge Replaceoent 320,000 E280,060 in State revenue 3. Bus Replaceoent 241,500 241,500 241,500 Assuoes 3 yr lease/purchase 4. Finish Interior of Mea Ski Museuo 160,006 5. Pave Ford Park Parking Lot 230,000 SDBTOTAL BE9DIRED PROJECTS 1,284,500 471,500 241,500 0 0 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1. Replace Fire Dept Breathing Apparatus 34,960 2. Neu TOAn Snoa Duop 210,000 3. Street Maint. A Ioprovenents 1,250,000 1,844,400 1,629,120 1,879,500 1,647,840 1,622,840 Per street eaintenance plan 4. Snoa Ducp Road/Overlay Shops Complex 200,000 5. Holy Cross Parcel Purchase 56,500 63,539 63,539 63,539 63,539 63,539 14 yr debt service 6. Berry Creek 5th Filing Debt Service 173,000 0 0 0 0 7. Bus Replacement Program 513,000 897,000 1,125,000 989,000 0 Bus Fleet Replaceoent by 1996 8. Parking Structures Maintenance 35,000 330,000 { 200,000 415,000 Per asset eaintenance Plan 9. Town Shops Maintenance A ioproveeents _30-0TOA(1.~ ata,uou 400,000 370,000 400,000 Per shops plan 10. Cooounications Systeo Maint. ~ Replcont 20,040 20,000 ~ _ _15,000 _ 15,000 15,000 20,000 Ongoing radio replacesent 11. Recreation Paths Maintenance 81,000 85,000 89,000 ~ 93,000 98,000 103,000 Per paths oaintenance plan 12. Miscellaneous Building Maintenance 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,600 25,000 25,000 Per RAM Coooittee plan 13. Neu Police Building 249,000 960,000 460,000 9B0",~00 ; 0 040 460,000 Aea Fire & Police Building i4. Fire Truck Replaceoent 250,000 ~ 375,000 Per Fire Truck Replaceoent Plan 15. Additional Buses 171,000 187,000 ~ 205,000 Additions to bus fleet 16. Street lights 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 ~ - -3A~,-G~08 ~ 30,000 Per street light plan 17. Dobson Arena Flooring 15,000 ~ 18. Bus Shelter Ioproveoents 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 ; 40,000 19. Chapel Bridge Replaceaent 35,000 365,000 ~ $320,000 in State revenue 20. Pedestrian Overpass 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 ~ 50,000 21. Fire fixtrication Equipment 16,000 t SDBTOTAL BSSfiNTIAL PROJECTS 2,404,460 4,351,939 4,384,659 4,588,039 4,363,379 , 3,434,379 ~ 3 i z lid ,~-f6~~f 9Sy DESIRABLE PROJEC?S 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1. Ford Park Sidewalk Ioprovenents 115,040 2. Replace Pulis Bridge 275,000 3. Inpleoent Master Transportation Plan 575, ODD 575, 000 575, 000 575, 000 575, 000 4. Street Furniture 20,000 20,000 20,000 26,000 20,000 SOBTOTAL DESIRABLE PROJECTS 985,000 595,000 595,000 595,004 595,000 = Estimated funding level available - - - - - - - =Estimated funding level available if street budget is reduced to $1,250,000 annually. 8 CAPSCADI Revised: 2/15/1991 TONN OF PAIL REAL BSTA?B TRANSFER TAg 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPAOVBHBNT PROJECTS PROPOSED PROJECTS 1991 1992 1993 ~ 199! 1995 CONDITIONS/COMtlBNTS 1. Nest 9ai1 Park Purchase Debt Service 72,086 67,436 62,784 2. Golf Maintenance Parcel 94,000 94,000 3. Donovan Part Aevegetation 7,000 4. Landscape Inprovenent Project 172,000 147,000 128,000 124,000 124,000 Per Landscape Plan 5. Gore Creet Proaenade 74,000 6. Athletic Field Restrooos 50,000 7. Sti Museue Deeolition, Part Construction 27,000 8. Stevens Park Construction 151,000 145,000 9. Parks, Open Space, 6 Mountain Recreation ~D Trails Master Plan/Feasibility Study 60,000 10. Sideealt Ieproveoents 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 11. DoAd Junction Recreation Path 275,000 12. Village Trans Ctr to Athletic Field Path 350,000 13. Donovan Part 84,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 14. Vail Das Schone Recreation Trail 85,500 . 15. Ford Part Lower Bench Ieproveoents 16. Buffehr Creek Park Tot Play Area 6,000 17. Mill Creek Landscaping 15,000 18. Ford Park Stating/Fishing Pond 84,000 TOTAL 757,086 1,303,936 665,784 584,000 668,000 3'iRRVMOG Revised 2i14/1y91 5 Year Operating Revenue 9udaet MOGEAATE BCENARI0 inflatian Rate; S.OX PROJECTED PAOJECTE"v PROJECTED PROJt'=TAD PROJECiEG 1940 1941 INCR. 1492 INCA. 194; INCR. 1994 INCR. 1995 INCR. 1448 ACCOUNT 86 ACTUAL 8i ACTUAL 9B ACTUAL 89 ACTUAL E8i]MATE BUD6Ei fACTDR 8UD6Ei (ACTOR BUGEEi FACTOR BUD^eET FACTOR BUG9Ei FACTOR 8UD6ET A5SUMPTIONS '71 GENERAL FUND REVENUE "rROPER.TY 1AXc8 1,4b1,21o 1,495,535 1,625,275 1,732,355 1,798,600 1,950,.`~3i 2.5X 1,646,1x4 1.5X 1,925,:40 1.5X 1,954,125 1.5X 1,93?,d37 l.SX 2,013,188 No hill levy increase. SPEC OMNSHP TAXES 63,342 59,13? 73,491 95,159 92,340 30,,)00 19.OX 99,000 5.0X 92,400 5.OX 47,020 S.OX 101,3it 5.0X 106,965 EETAiL SALES TAX 3,956,960 4,310,617 5.154,:1' S,b9o,9b4 5,509,598 b,2`.~9,i10ri 8.2X 6,/71,236 8.5X 7,341,878 9.5X 1,479,146 1.bX 8,566.210 8.4X 9,307,506 S.OX annual groNth SALES iA% wUDIT REV. 0 0 8,677 4,45.9 21,099 36,754 .OX 36,150 5.OX 38,599 S.OX 40,511 S.OX 42,54; S.GX 44,670 SF:I LIFT TAX 596,335 500,334 633,124 763,288 844,447 888,020 S.OX 932,400 5.4X 91.4,920 S.OX 1,+)21,471 S.OX 1,019,310 S.OX 1,1.3,339 5X annual Growth FRANCHISE FEE;PUB SEAV. 23,104 29,536 28,268 34,624 31,040 b,0v0 2.GX 36,120 2.OX 37,454 2.OX 39,93 5.0X 40,114 S.UX 42,119 FRANCNISE FEcAJ.S. HEST 30,671 31,914 32,218 35,122 34,535 "~,~}90 S.OX '6,150 S.OX 3B,`,~SB S.i~X 4n,5.1i S.OX d1, 543 S.OX 44,610 FRANCHISE FEElHOLY CROS5 230,369 242,999 259,325 167,101 292,524 242,00+) 5.0X 306,600 S.OX 321,430 2.OX 323,359 5.OX 344,%=% 5.OX 352,025 FRANCHI9E FEEiCABLE R' 23,000 38,546 14,000 86,743 89,294 94,,)00 IO.t1X 92,4(.,0 5.4X 91,724 S.OX 101,371 S.OX 1!6,965 S.OX 112,313 rPENALTY AND INTEREST 0,454 15,843 21,865 39,502 36,320 35.000 5.vX 31,900 S.OX 39,690 5.0X 41,515 S.OX 43,158 S.OX 45,446 Subtatai TAXEB 6,403,491 6,734,371 7,415,561 8,150,462 8,145,991 9,547,291 6.7X 14,235,452 b J7. 10,917,3Id B.iX 11,650,053 5.2X 12,'11,545 6.8X 13,212,141 to BUILOIN6 PERMITS 114,213 121,884 45,01! 137,474 164,286 99,001, 20.OX 118,300 5.OX 114,140 5.0X 130,971 5.OX 1;7.5:6 5.0X 144,402 ~ n "riUNBIN6 PERMITS 16,548 16,504 10,599 IB,48b 14,502 13,000 20.OX 15,500 5.4X 18,380 5.OX !7,149 S.OX 18,c59 S.OX 19,962 H MEiiiANICAL PERMITS T4,320 25,041 14,811 25,849 34,9bo 18,004 20.OX 21,600 5.OX 22,590 S.OX 23,514 5.OX 25,005 5.OX 26,255 ~ r O O ELECTRICAL fEAMIiS 29,878 34,13; 23,554 35,247 38,168 23,000 20.07. 21,600 S.OX 29,98) S.OX 30,429 S.OX 31,150 S.OX 33,548 Z Off HOUP.S INSPEC. FEES 0 0 431 426 90 7011 20.OX 6411 S.OX 892 S.OX 426 S.OX 972 5.OX 1,021 +..a STREET CUT PERMITS 5,055 4,435 1,425 4,425 7,800 1,315 20.OX 1,650 S.OX 1,733 S.OX 1,814 S.OX 1,410 S.OX 2,006 C CGM DEV P,E.C. VAR. FEES 7,898 7,300 14,845 12,276 11,029 12,500 20.OX 15,000 S.OX 15,754 S.OX 16,538 5.OX !7,364 S.OX 18,233 GEBIC•N AEVIER fEE5 4,130 5,620 4,917 7,445 9,740 5,500 10.UX 5,600 S.OX 6,930 S.OX 7,171 S.OX 7,640 S.OX 8,022 PLAN CHEi.!i FEES 68,151 73,052 53,696 75,091 92,531 60,500 20.OX 12,500 S.OX 16,230 S.OX 80,042 S.OX 54,044 5.OX 89,246 FOOD SERVICE PLAN CHECKS 450 450 20.OX 540 S.OX 567 S:OX 545 S.OX 825 S.OX 656 S~~btatal CONSTRUCTION FEES 210,141 288,574 219,345 317,714 398,568 234,025 20.OX 190,230 S.OX 294,912 S.OX 304,515 5.OX 325,v48 S.OX 341,351 REBTAURANI LICENSES 3,135 3,054 3,135 3,775 8,650 8,400 .OX 8,400 .OX 9,400 .OX 8,400 S.OX 8,920 .OX 8,920 6EN BUSINESS LICENSES 66,100 45,439 72,332 1,478 1,375 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIQUOR LICENSES 5,441 7,493 5,851 6,775 1,209 7,070 S.OX 1,353 .OX 7,354 .OX 7,350 S.OX 7,718 .4X 7,418 CGiIiRACTORS LICENSES 21,110 22,830 9,310 21,880 28,245 18,000 50.OX 21,000 S.OX 28,354 S.OX 24,159 S.OX 31,156 S.OX 32,819 BISN APP!1CATION PERMITS 1,142 1,185 1,140 1,380 1,263 1,200 IO.OX 1,310 S.OX 1,386 S.OX 1,455 S.OX 1,528 S.OX 1,604 DO6 LICENSES 1,378 1,080 1,150 1,515 2,470 1,600 15.0X 2,000 S.OX 1,100 5.4X 2,205 S.OX 2,315 S.OX 2,431 Subttl LICENSE"s A PERMITS 99,944 82,126 93,018 31,303 49,212 3b, 200 17.3X 46,070 3.3X 47,585 3.3X 44,178 S.OX 51,631 3.4X 53,342 CIGARETTE TAX 115,503 132,329 541,160 157,130 153,039 1bt1,090 .OX 160,000 1.OX 161,600 LOX 183,210 .OX 183,116 .OX 163,216 HI6Hi4AY USERS TAX 86,566 82,344 82,937 97,436 121,543 128,1%0 5.4X 134,`05 S.OX 141,23G 5.OX 149,292 S.OX 155,106 S.OX 183,491 ADD MO10R VEHICLE P.E9. 13,739 16,740 14,014 21,041 22,843 22,;1110 S.OX 23,100 S.OX 24,255 S.OX 25.468 S.OX 26,141 S.OX 28,078 COUNTY ROAD k BRIDGE FUND 211,749 110,588 250,116 263,183 261,951 344,362 4.OX 381,355 9.OX 415,879 5.5X 438,540 5.5X 462,560 5.5X 489,107 COUNTY SALES TAX 124,815 124,257 139,401 167,428 180,931 192,000 2.OX 195,940 S.OX 205,632 S.OX 215,914 S.OX 216,104 S.OX 236,045 UMTA GRANT 0 4 64,800 80,788 19,900 0 0 4 0v 0 'STATE HEALTH INSP. REV. 0 0 14,303 12,496 9,449 9,500 5.OX 9,91`.• 2.OX 10,175 1.OX 14,319 2.OX 10,586 2.OX 10,197 5ubtotal INTER60VEANMENTAL 559,472 511,258 108,431 149,130 790,146 861,4=8 S.OX 904, T•5 5.9X 459,570 4.SX 1,001,909 4.4X 1,045,514 4,4X 1,441,134 PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTEG PkOJE~.TEo PROJECTED 1490 1991 [NCR. 144? INCR. 144;, INCR. 1994 INCA. 145 INCA. 1445 ACCGlNT B6 ACTUAL 87 ACTUAL 88 ACTUAL 89 ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET FACTOR BUDGET r'ACTOA BUDGET FACTOR BUDGET FACTOR BUDGET FACTOR BUGGET ASSUMPTIONS -----------.--------------------,.0,9,0 20 + CUT OF 0151. FIRE RESP 18,43 22,84a 25,141 ' ,f l' 7),5')9 lS.OX 2;,575 S.OX 24,?54 5.UX 25,'9?1 S.OX 27,291 S.OX ;.8,556 - sN'~+i kEMCVAL 10 11,291 6,446 5,446 2.;,023 7,?-9 S.OX 8,390 S.OX 8,80? S.OX 9,249 S.OX 4,712 S.OX l0, 197 'r~l;CE ALARM MONiTCR FEE 35,101 36,JI2 3?,942 42,531 43,339 45,3'-ti S.OX d7,5b5 5.OX d?,?43 S.OX 52,#40 S.OX 55,062 S.OX 57,815 C.;4TkACTEG MUNICiPAI SERV 172,274 65,363 '2,240 33,001 23,4;9 33,5:5 0 0 n 0 0 Aszurs?~ 1442 full annezatier. DISPATCHING CONTRACTS 23,760 34,000 37,440 40,645 44,710 46.840 S.OX 49,182 S.OX 51,•541 S.OX 54,221 S.OX 56,?34 S.OX 59,?81 LIQUOR LIC HEARING FEES 10,524 9,950 4,500 8,525 8,715 8,09!1 lO.OX 9,900 5.07. 9,240 S.OX 9,702 S.OX 10,187 S.OX 10,695 PiTi:iN CREEK ADMIN REV. 1,5U0 G 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 ELSC. 1NSPEC SERVICES 1,262 7,025 7,3;5 8,640 7,?20 9,i~75 S.OX 9,52? 5.OX 10,405 5.OX IO,SAS S.OX 11.)31 S.OX 11,582 'CNiN6 MAPS 1,539 1,007 1,x99 317 642 500 20.OX 600 S.OX 630 5.OX 662 S.OX 595 S.OX 124 G?RAR't MISC. SERVICES 207 58 864 105 1,030 ~ 7•x0 S.OX 735 S.OX 772 S.OX 810 S.OX 851 5.OX 893 LiSRARY PHOTOCOPIES 0 5,060 3,81 4,?29 5,534 5,000 15.OX 5,750 S.OX 6,039 S.OX 5,33? S.OX 6,656 S.GX 6,499 BL2EPRINT MACHINE FE'r5 0 0 48? 1,174 !,72 1,240 25.0: 1,SOn S.OX 1,575 S. Ur 1,654 S.UX 1,735 5.07. 1,823 0 0 Si"POSIUM 38,797 31,314 23,9+J4 28,160 0 'j 0 0 0 MA~~6EMENi FEE%UMRO 25,000 27,125 29,1") 15,887 26,846 20,000 5.07. 11,000 5.4X 21,95U 5.07. 23,153 S.OX 24.310 5.OX 25,526 Saoe relationship with VMAO PAY PHONE REVENUE 0 0 11,351 14,556 9,421 14,000 5.OX 14,700 S.OX 15,435 S.UX 16,207 5.07. 11,017 5.GX 17,868 HE1?PAD USE CHARGE 2,490 1,600 IO.OX 2,860 S.OX 3,003 S.OX 3,153 5.07. 3,311 S.OX 3,476 P~iICE CONTP.ACT OVERTIME 2,021 4,015 5,+)40 S.OX 5,250 S.OX 5,513 S.OX 5,789 S.OX 6,079 5.OX b, 381 REiyBURSEMENT FOA SDD AGS 0 1,590 5.0.7. 1,575 S.OX 1,554 5.07. 1,735 S.OX 1,823 5.OX 1,?14 PEACE OFFICERS SKI RACE 940 i 354J 4,000 4,040 4,UU0 4,000 4,00') 4,000 Saottl CHARGES FOR SERVICE 334,605 251,148 224,209 24?,852 211,646 225,730 -9.2X 2x5,010 4.4X 215,761 4.9X 225,614 4.?X 2'6,594 4.9X 243,329 !IUNiCIPAL CCUAT REST. 15,295 14,730 1,378 1,548 1,424 1,000 50.OX 1,500 5.OX 1,575 S.OX 1,554 S.OX 1,736 S.OX 1,823 C"_~ki COST & FEE5 2,111 11,341 4,181 5,235 6,624 5,500 S.OX 5,175 5.GX 5,054 5.OX o,3b7 S.OX 6,695 S.OX 7,02E PAnKIN6 FINES 38,406 38,75U 54,225 67,372 40,670 10,009 S.OX 73,500 S.OX ?7,175 S.OX 81,034 S.OX 85,085 5.07. 84,140 r~ r-- A4;;!AL CONTROL FINES 1,300 1,678 2,685 5,114 8,050 5,.`•00 S.OX •5,825 S.OX 7,1.65 S.OX 7,525 S.OX 7,901 S.OX 8,295 MG;IN6 VIGLATION FINE5 17,432 13,529 16,343 14,482 19,367 19,000 S.OX 14,950 S.OX 20,948 S.OX 21,495 5.OX 23,x45 S.OX 24,249 OTHER FINE5 14,538 38,244 83,707 83,530 107,377 80,000 lO.OX 88,000 S.OX 42,400 5.UX 97,010 S.OX 101,871 5.OX 105,465 TGt~iN6 18,505 13,099 11,726 14,186 15,536 10,000 40.OX 14,000 5.OX 14,700 S.OX 15,435 S.OX 16,207 S.OX 17,017 LiBRAkY FIMES 0 4,600 4,474 4,850 6,454 5,5i~0 5.OX 5,175 S.UX 6,064 5.07. 6,351 S.OX 5,585 5.OX 7,020 Li?RARY MATERIAL CNAR6E5 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 LI2P.ARY GRANTS 8,205 16,563 -'rS~.MIT PENALTIES 0 0 341 132 538 IUO S.OX~' 105 S.OX 110 S.OX llb S.OX 122 S.OX 128 Su5total FINES 5 FORFEITS 113,684 142,258 119,110 210,205 214,103 147,60E 9.OX 215,43E S.OX 126,202 5.OX 237,511 S.OX 245,:•81 S.OX 261,857 GAiI'f PARK CJG FEE5 409,605 874,205 983,339 1,062,724 1,121,652 1,297,606 7.07. 1,387,190 S.OX 1,451,180 S.OX 1,530,038 S.OX 1,665,540 S.GX 1,686,867 LEASES & 01HER 116,080 100,745 124,554 136,253 40,457 8!,260 S.OX 85,323 S.OX 84,539 S.OX 94,069 S.OX 48,772 S.OX 103,711 Scttl TRANSPORTATION CNTR 1,035,685 975,001 1,107,842 1,198,971 1,162,114 1,378,260 b.9X 1,413,113 5.07. 1,546,76? S.OX 1,524,107 5.OX 1,705,312 5.OX 1,790,578 PASSES 4,754 4,905 2,280 CHRISTMAS ICE SHOM 59,956 52,520 72,202 GUEST FEES 35,154 38,621 38,515 S'rECiAI EVENTS 35,866 45,573 42,087 FiSURE SKATING SCHOOL 39,007 61,126 82,422 CLASSES 5,518 6,318 8,311 LE~SE;[CE PRO SHOP 3,454 3,550 0 FuCG CONCESSIONS 35,066 54,583 45,339 SU~~cR HOCt;EY SCHOOLS 15,245 10,?A1 15,315 Sca:'ICE5/SKATE RENTAL 14,545 11,514 11,456 SKATE 5HAkPEtiING 0 2,313 1,924 RLVK RENTAL 27,323 19,815 45,03'• H6CKEY 22,168 19,451 21,01? S)..ATi`G CLUA GF 'JAIL 0 215 6.411 C'!Li"G 0 ib5 .E401N9 yAC;iiNE5 0 2,565 IO,i25 LSCt:EA REvEtiLIE 1,517 1,5h6 2,9?~ NISCELLANEOUS 6GG 2,6'3 3,722 `.htotal GOBSGN ARENA 300,779 348,195 425,9"•.1 0 FR6JECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJE~TE3 PROJECTED 1940 191 INCR. 1942 INCR. 1??3 INCR, 1994 INCR. 1??5 INCR. 1995 ACCOUNT 86 ACTUAL 97 ACTUAL 99 ACTUAL 39 ACTUAL ESiINATE BUDGET FACTGR 9UDSEi FACTGR AUG_ET FACTOR AUD6ET FACTOR 6UD9ET FACTOR AUDGET ASSUMPTIONS RECREATION ~?OGRAt!S 265,639 212,499 232,354 Pr,TPGL'RRI 19,699 24,901 27,722 MANABENE'iT FEEr'JMRD 26,456 26,660 22,000 Same relationship with UNRD Sutttl RECREAT30tJ PflO6RANS 245,797 .57,899 282,076 E-RNIN95 ON iN!'ESTNENTS 105,417 150,612 197,335 333,516 113,638 255,066 1.OX 257,5:9 i.OX 266,126 1.0% 262,727 1.67. 255.354 1.6X 259,009 POST GFFICE RE:'iTAL 29,713 29,119 29,719 15,260 G 0 0 0 G L'i?ER RENTAL_ 47,0?6 46,197 38,:9? 36,163 63,463 42,369 5.0': 44,415 S.OX 46,6;6 5,6X 48,"r69 5.6X 51,4;5 S.OX 53,q°7 TO7 DECk; RENTALS 0 6 3,983 7,508 7,590 7,215 5,07. 576 S,i}; ,45. S.GX 8, 5.OX ~ 5.GX 9,:09 PGLICE LOST AND FOUND 723 ( 62v? i 21"1 864 172 2511 .OX ,25~i .UX 250 .OX 256 .OX .OX 250 INS. CLAL9S PROCEEDS 20,437 19,144 6,546 ( 24) 2,171 G 0 0 0 6 0 N MISC SALES%AOOKS/ETC. 12,834 3,324 5,244 3,565 :,477 3,000 1`,,OX 3,45i~ 5,6X 3,623 S.OX 3,904 5.6X ,4~4 S.GX 4,143 EUiLOINO CODE BOOK SALES 0 0 1,534 2,721 2,070 2,000 S.GX 2,1CG S.GX 2,2i~5 S.OX 2,315 S.OX %,131 5.OX 2,551 PGLICE CONFISCATION P.EU. 31,828 2,678 0 r"GLICE N[SC. 0 3,467 791 5,362 6,7n0 4,G!%0 S.GX 4,200 S.UX 4,41E S.OX 4,631 S.OX 4,362 5.OX 5,105 EHPLOYEE DENTAL IN5 REU 2,330 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 TRAtJSPER FROM OTHER FUNDS 391,672 50,600 55,600 0 0 G G 0 0 ~ 0 TRADE-iN REVENUE 0 125 1,191 0 6 0 .OX ,OX 0 .6X 0 .OX 0 FALLRIDOE AUS CONTRACT 3,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCELLANEOIJS 43,961 70,314 46,734 107,529 65,767 26,3t?G S,GX 27,615 5,6X 29,4?6 S.OX 30,446 5.OX 31,?59 S.OX 33,566 EMPLOYEE NOUSIN6 RENTALS 127,430 0 0 0 0 0 UVI SPACE LEASE 0 b0,0i?6 -6b JX 26,660 .0,'. 20,000 S.OX 21,600 5.OX ZZ,G50 S.OX 23,153 Suhtotal OTIiER 627,550 376,336 375,3:6 562,9'ai 282,316 527,995 -30.SX 367,155 1.?X 314,144 2.2X 392,481 2.2X 3?1,)=4 2.3X 466,023 TCiAL 9ENERAt FUND REVENUE 54,489,165 610,022,352 ;11,536,174 sL2,i27,h94 111,398,067 113,058,554 S.SX 113,729,537 6.2X f14,5B1,G71 b.2X f15,486,387 5.8X fi6,376,486 6.2X 117,400,004 3YREIMOD Revised 2/14/1991 TOMN OF VAIL 5 YEAR BUDGET PROJECTIDN , MODERATE SCENARIO Inflation Assu~ption: S.OI I i 6F Revenue frog '3YRRVM00' 11,536,774 12,121,694 11,898,061 13,058,559 13,728,837 14,581,071 15,480,387 16,316,486 17,400,004 GENERAL FUND Estioated Estiaated Esti~ated Esti~ated Esti~ated 1988 1984 1990 1991 Incr. 1992 Incr. 1993 Incr. 1994 lncr. 1995 Incr. 1996 Expense Category Actual Actual Estivate Budget factor Budget Factor Budget factor Budget Factor Budget factor Budget Assu~ptians Salaries, Wages 6 Benefits 5,130,792 5,519,310 6,133,824 6,923,614 b.OX 7,339,036 b.OX 1,811,178 S.OX 8,233,237 5.01 8,616,394 S.OX 9,141,714 ' • Health lnsurante 460,154 516,326 588,662 755,435 16.01 876,305 16.OX 1,416,513 16.01 1,179,155 1b.OX 1,361,820 16.01 1,586,672 • New Positions 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Add'1 Bus Expenses 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 55,000 1 add'I bus in 1992!199411996 ' Oper. Expenses 2,729,259 1,832,464 4,233,015 2,364,494 S.OX 2,482,714 S.OX 2,654,355 S.OX 2,792,322 S.OX 2,984,438 5.01 3,133,660 Utilities 345,020 246,699 298,110 397,559 .OX 341,559 .OX 397,559 S.OX 417,437 5.OI 438,309 5.01 460,214 Telephone Rate Expense 59,520 89,745 102,971 98,480 S.Oi 103,404 S.OX 108,574 S.OX 114,003 S.UX 119,703 5.01 125,688 Library Baoks 45,661 49,611 57,405 10,310 7.OX 75,232 7.OI 80,498 7.OI Bb,133 7.OI 92,162 1.OI 98,613 Co~puter Maint. 31,464 43,387 43,117 38,325 5.OX 40,241 S.OX 42,253 S.OX 44,366 S.OI 46,584 5.01 48,913 Heavy Equip~ent Rental 840,289 997,885 1,000,415 1,086,968 -.6X 1,080,260 4.9X 1,133,523 4.7X 1,186,854 4.BX 1,244,114 5.01 1,305,699 - Auto Lease 39,180 40,170 40,580 53,040 .OX 53,040 lO.OX 58,344 .OX 58,344 .OX 58,344 5.01 61,261 Morkers' Copp. 204,263 190,069 197,946 200,000 20.OX 240,000 lO.OX 264,000 10.01 290,400 10.01 319,440 10.01 351,384 - World Cha~pshps Donation 116,413 116,413 116,413 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ VMRD Recreation Contract 0 538,068 516,895 543,243 .OX 543,243 .OX 543,243 .OY 543,243 .OI 543,243 .01 543,243 Insurance Preeiu~s 402,519 308,910 324,759 356,250 lO.OX 391,875 S.UX 411,469 S.OX 432,042 .OX 432,042 .01 432,042 Assures hard Market in 1942 Trans to Other Funds 1,820,000 • E~ployee Nousing 133,565 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 TOTAL 6F EIPENSE 11,010,794 12,357,042 13,654,152 13,021,288 5.41 13,727,913 6.11 14,581,504 6.2X 15,482,531 5.81 16,377,599 6.21 11,344,120 FUND O1 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) 525,980 ( 229,3981 11,756,085) 31,21! 924 ( 4, B) ( 2,150) ( 1,1131 884 ENOIN6 FUND BALANCE 2,621,753 2,392,356 602,211 1,639,542 1,640,466 1,640,021 1,637,877 1,636,764 1,637,648 !0 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1988 1489 1990 1991 Incr, 1991 Incr. 1943 Incr. 1944 Incr. 1995 Incr. 1996 - REVENUE - Actual Actual Estimate Budget factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Retail Sales lax 4,850,318 4,727,124 5,327,517 5,101,000 -4.8X 4,855,678 ,1X 4,861,434 -.4X 4,839,981 .7X 4,874,506 -1.OX 4,826,299 Resort Fee/Nail Assoc. 633,124 163,288 840,441 888,000 S.OX 932,400 S.OX 979,020 S.OX 1,027,971 S.OX 1,079,310 S.OX 1,133,338 County Sales Tax 139,407 167,426 180,931 192,000 2.OX 195,840 S.OX 205,632 S.OX 115,414 5.OX 226,709 S.OX 238,045 Street Use Tax 0 0 0 Recreation Amenities Fees 34,669 51,174 148,251 20,000 50.OX 30,000 .OX 30,000 .OX 30,000 .OX 30,000 .OX 30,000 Earnings from Investments 136,621 232,853 691,981 181,000 .OX 181,000 .OX 181,000 .OX 181,000 '.OX 181,000 181,000 Post Office Rent 7,835 62,617 35,575 ` Other 238,043 902,431 445,152 354,000 60,000 125,000 150,000 125,000 0 Bus trade-in revenue . .RETT Loan Repayment 505,508 507,300 508,307 530,000 546,680 532,482 561,524 loan repayments , Transfer from SPAF 500,000 187,110 Trans from General fund 1,620,000 Bond Proceeds 8,279,683 TOTAL FUND 10 REVENUE 6,040,017 17,307,256 8,342,418 1,243,300 -b.bX 6,163,225 2.ZX 6,912,086 1.1X 6,491,546 .8X 7,049,067 -1.OX 6,916,206 EXPENSE Trans to Deht Service 3,238,230 2,893,760 3,414,404 4,015,097 4,051,657 4,048,999 3,805,025 3,245,099 3,293,152 Streets 1,235,885 1,686,584 1,345,000 1,150,000 47.6X 1,844,400 -11.7X 1,624,120 15, 4X 1,874,500 -12.3X 1,641,840 -1.51 1,621,840 Per street improvement plan Project Rollforward 0 0 1,245,000 Defease RETT Narrants 2,671,762 Avail. for Other Projects 1 094 573 1 350 986 10 908 851 1 967 960 867 168 1 233 967 1 307 020 2 156 127 2 060 114 A ~ i r ~ ~ ~ i i s , i s ~ s ~ i~ Parking Structure TOTAL FUND 10 EXPENSE 5,568,688 9,348,442 15,668,255 8,488,057 -20.3X 6,763,215 Z.2X 6,912,088 6,991,546 7,049,061 6,976,206 FUND 10 SURPLUS/IOEFIC IT) 411,339 7,958,764 (7,325,717) (1,244,157) 0 0 0 0 0 ENDIND FUND BALANCE 1,037,964 8,946,728 1,670,951 426,194 426,194 426,194 426,144 426,194 426,194 30 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAN Estioated Estisated Esti~ated Esti~ated Esti~ated 1988 1984 1990 1991 Incr. 1992 Incr. 1993 Incr. 1994 Incr. 1495 Incr. 1996 ; REVENUE Actual Actual Estivate Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget factor Budget Factor Budget Real Estate Transfer Tax 1,617,026 2,043,949 1,387,814 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Transfer frog VMRD 70,000 10,000 13,400 T7,070 S.OZ 80,924 S.OZ 84,970 S.OZ 89,218 S.OZ 93,679 S.OZ 98,363 , Interest lnco~e 153,215 201,660 189,319 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 141,000 ' Miscellaneous 20,000 10,000 TOTAL FUND 30 REVENUE 1,860,241 2,331,604 1,650,593 1,4(8,070 .3Z 1,421,924 .3Z 1,425,970 .3Z 1,430,218 .3Z 1,434,614 .3Z 1,139,363 ENPENSE Purchase of Open Space 411,412 340,432 340,932 340,432 340,932 340,932 340,932 340,932 340,932 Transfer to Oebt Service 184,163 193,087 200,000 366,086 361,436 262,784 200,000 200,000 0 Transfer to Fund 10 505,508 501,300 508,307 530,000 546,680 532,482 567,524 Loan Repay~ent Projects 736,583 595,085 999,251 821,000 211,249 292,254 342,606 361,265 530,907 Project RollforNard 94,500 388,100 Defease RETT Marrants 541,561 TOTAL FUND 30 ENPENSE 2,036,658 2,270,665 2,433,741 1,835,318 1,421,424 1,425,470 1,430,218 1,434,679 1,439,363 FUND 30 SURPLUSlIDEfICTi) ( 176,417) 60,944 ( 783,198) I 417,248) 0 0 0 0 0 u' END1N6 FUND BALANCE 1 911 890 2 061 420 1 278 222 880 974 Bb0 474 860 974 860 974 860 974 860 474 ' 02 TOV LOTTERY FUND Esti~ated Esti~ated Esti~ated Esti~ated Esti~ated 1988 1989 1990 1491 Incr. 1992 Incr. 1993 Incr. 1994 Incr. 1995 Incr. 1996 Actual Actual Estivate Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget factor Budget factor Budget Lottery Revenue 8,710 7,337 1,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Recreational Expenses 8,110 1,337 1,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 FUND 02 SURPLUS!(OEf[CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1988 1989 1940 1991 Incr. 1992 Incr. 1993 Incr, 1994 Incr. 1995 incr. 1996 REVENUE Actual Actual Estimate Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget HEF Operating ChargeslBF 643,399 699,892 770,516 837,448 2,2Z 855,642 6.2X 908,955 5.4Z 462,286 b.OZ 1,019,546 b.OZ 1,081,131 HEF Replacement Charges/8F 196,890 295,622 228,268 249,520 -Ip,OZ 224,568 .OX 224,568 .OX 224,568 .OX 224,568 .OZ 224,568 HEF Oper Charges/Cap Proj. 101,166 54,960 85,937 74,000 5.OX 77,700 S.OZ 81,585 S.OX 85,664 S.pX 89,947 S.OZ 94,445 HEF Repl.Charges/Cap Proj. 50,690 56,535 75,214 Sb,200 -IO.OZ 50,580 .OX 50,580 .OX 50,580 .OZ 50,580 .OZ 50,580 Building Rents 100,000 (06,000 104,000 104,000 S.OX 109,200 S.OX 114,660 5.OX 120,393 S.OX 126,413 S, OX 132,733 Interest income 11,648 25,241 26,612 25,000 6.6X 26,660 11.BX 29,191 -S.bZ 28,137 -16.bX 23,479 S.OX 24,641 Miscellaneous 313,522 8,811 58,265 54,000 .OX 59,000 .OX 59,000 .OX 59,000 .OZ 59,000 .OX 59,000 TOTAL FUND 40 REVENUE 1,423,315 1,247,061 1,348,872 1,405,168 -,!Z 1,403,400 4.7X 1,464,145 4.2Z 1,530,628 4.1Z 1,543,533 4.6Z 1,667,099 EXPENSE Salaries, Nages 6 Benefits 327,4(2 355,681 362,508 442,646 6.OX 469,205 6.OZ 497,357 S.OX 522,225 S.OX 548,336 S.OI 575,153 Health Insurance 31,379 37,411 52,736 61,868 16.OX 78,727 16.OX 91,323 16.OX 105,935 16.OX 122,884 16.01 142,546 Motor Fuels 115,447 121,103 154,185 180,000 5.OX 189,p00 S,OX 198,450 S.OX 208,373 5.OX 218,791 S.OZ 224,731 Vehicle Insurance 25,456 22,246 24,237 25,300 S,OZ 26,565 S.OX 27,893 S.OX 29,288 S.OZ 30,752 S.OX 32,290 Vehicle Replacement 364,468 369,968 383,274 339,000 -16,1X 284,500 -9.7X 257,OOp 29.bX 333,000 12.5X 314,500 -28.OZ 264,500 Parts, Supplies, Util., etc 298,026 311,752 281,406 311,285 S.OZ 326,849 S.pX 343,142 S.OZ 360,351 S.OX 318,369 S.OI 391,287 Computer Equip Rollforward 40,000 TOTAL FUND 40 EXPENSE 1,16A,188 1,218,661 1,264,446 1,406,099 -2.2Z 1,314,846 2.9X 1,415,215 10,2X 1,559,171 1.3Z 1,613,633 -1.6Z 1,647,101 rn FUND 40 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) 255,121 28,400 83,926 ( 9311 28,555 53,929 ( 28,543) ( 80,100) 19,992 ENDING FUND BALANCE 333,493 346,914 430,840 429,909 458,464 512,393 483,850 403,750 423,742 50 DEBT SERVICE FUND Estimated Estimated Estieated Estimated Estimated 1988 1989 1490 1941 Incr. 1992 Incr. 1943 Incr. 1994 Intr. 1995 Incr. 1946 REVENUE Actual Actual Estimate Budget Factor Budget factor Budget Factor budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Transfer from Cap. Projects 3,238,230 2,693,760 3,414,404 4,025,097 4,051,657 4,048,999 3,805,025 3,245,099 3,T43,252 Transfer from RETT 789,163 193,087 200,000 366,086 361,436 262,784 200,000 100,000 0 Interest Income 124,428 116,489 124,978 90,812 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 Bond Proceeds 919,965 6. 1. C. Interest 7,422 100,188 205,783 335,410 475,806 624,569 Trans from SPAF 275,000 274,000 281,700 289,794 298,314 307,295 311,687 TDTAL FUND 50 REVENUE 4,151,821 4,533,301 4,021,804 4,856,183 5,015,576 5,051,987 4,894,145 4,491,963 3,719,939 ENPENDITUAES Band Issue Payments 3,102,861 2,698,925 2,698,195 2,697,510 2,702,070 2,700,806 2,697,960 3,512,286 3,450,000 f1,351,142 reserve available Ner Debt Payments 0 0 on Dec. 2, 1995. Sinking fund Contributions 1,099,306 1,331,790 1,636,281 1,772,558 1,922,546 707,513 , fiscal Agent Fees 8,374 10,301 9,228 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 Lease Payments 373,358 304,335 146,825 835,511 665,725 561,123 262,139 260,664 258,434 Land Narrants Payments 589,163 542,831 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' TOTAL FUND 50 ENPEN5E 4,173,762 3,606,398 4,003,554 4,876,311 5,015,576 5,051,987 4,894,145 4,491,963 3,719,439 FUND 50 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) ( 21,941) 926,903 18,250 ( 20,188) 0 0 0 0 0 ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,428,563 2,355,466 2,373,716 2,353,528 2,353,528 2,353,518 2,353,528 2,353,528 2,353,528 31 SPEC1Al PARKING A55E5SMENT FUND Estimated Estieated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1988 1989 1490 1991 Incr. 1942 Intr. 1443 Intr. 1944 Intr. 1995 Incr. 1946 REVENUE Actual Actual Estimate Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Factor Budget Parking Assessment Revenue 63,663 50,023 53,233 30,000 lO.OX 33,000 lO.OX 36,300 lO.OX 39,430 IO.OX 43,923 IO.OX 48,315 Assumes 1491 Fee Increase Daily Parking Revenues 51,004 231,705 233,513 235,000 1.OX 239,700 1.OX 244,444 1.OX 249,38-0 2.UX 254,312 254,372 Interest Income 18,442 54,441 10,329 4,000 .OX 9,000 .OX 9,000 .OX 4,000 .OX 9,000 9,000 Miscellaneous Transfer from General Fund 200,000 TOTAL FUND 31 REVENUE 134,109 536,110 291,135 274,000 281,700 289,794 198,314 301,295 31!,687 ENPENDITUAES Parking Projects 44,635 174,137 Transfer to Debt Se?vite 175,000 214,000 281,700 284,794 298,314 307,245 311,681 Trans to Capital Projects 500,000 16],110 TOTAL FUND 31 ENPENDITURES 94,635 614,737 442,110 274,000 281,700 289,194 298,314 307,295 311,681 FUND 31 SURPLUS/IDEFICIT) 34,474 ( 138,567) ( 144,975) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENDING FUND BALANCE 305,671 161,110 22,135 22,!35 22,135 22,135 22,135 12,135 12,135 TOWN OF VAIL Sales Tax History 12 Month Moving Total ,z4o000c ,,.00000 ,0400000 X400000 r O ~ ~ x400000 .C ~ 7400000 4400000 s4oooo0 4400000 3400000 JAN ~ 1 JAN 83 JAN 85 JAN 87 JAN 89 JAN 91 JAN 82 JAN 8'4 JAN 86 JAN 88 JAN 90 Months Y ? • SLSTXEST GROWTH 1990 EST. 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 10,751,656 3.U% 11,074,206 11,406,432 11,748,625 12,101,084 12,464,116 12,838,040 4.0% 11,181,722 11,628,991 12,C?94,151 12,577,917 13,081,033 13,604,275 5.0% 11,289,239 11,853,7C?1 12,446,336 13,C?68,705 13,722,140 14,408,247 5.5% 11,342,997 11,966,862 12,625,0139 13,3J9,416 14,051,984 14,824,844 6.C?% 11,396,755 12,C?8C?,561 12,8C?5,394 13,573,718 14,388,141 15,251,430 1991 BtIDGET : $11 , 350?, U00 5 YR BUDGET SCENARIO: 11,074,2C?6 11,627,916 12,2C?9,312 12,819,777 13,460,766 14,133,805 3% 5% 5°i 5% 5% 5% i . I 1 MEMORANDUM I TO: Mayor Kent Rose j Town Council Members Ron Phillips FROM: Pam Brandmey~ DATE: February 14, 1991 ~ RE: Listing of 1990 Council Priority Goals With Current Status Below is a copy of Charlie Wick's June 26, 1990, memo to Council updating the priorities set at the January 1990 long-range goal setting session. Added to this is a follow-up, where applicable. i Council members should have in mind her/his top five priorities to help expedite the 1991 goal setting process on Tuesday, February 19th. GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS STRATEGIC Vail Valley Foundation has developed Vail Valley Foundation now is PLANNING the scope for a strategic planning saying it is not appropriate process. The start of the project for them to fill this role. has been delayed to the fall of 1990 due to the transition of the Vail Valley Foundation presidency. 1 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS LAND/OPEN Staff prepared a list of fourteen SPACE PURCHASES parcels for Council prioritization for possible Town of Vail purchase. Following are those properties acted upon by Town Council and Staff. • TOV under contract to purchase four Four lots purchased. lots in West Vail, Vail Das Schone Filing 1 for a future pocket park. • Intermountain swimming pool parcel. Pool structure razed and purchased. Pool is being removed. initial landscaping begun. Site to be landscaped this summer. • Spraddle Creek and Golf Course Appraisals were $345,000 for Maintenance Parcel: These parcels, Spraddle and $20,700 for the owned by the U.S. Forest Service, Golf Course Maintenance are currently being appraised. Parcel. Appraisals are undergoing review by the Regional Office of U.S.F.S, • The two Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation District parcels are delayed one year by a joint agreement between the T.O.V. and U.E.V.W. & S. 2 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS LAND/OPEN Holy Cross Electric has been Contract approved. Waiting SPACE PURCHASES presented a contract for the for REA approval to make (CONTINUED) Town to purchase the Holy Cross decisions on whether to invest Electric site. Their Board of in further environmental Directors has not yet acted upon testing. our contractual offer. • Berry Creek 5th Filing purchased. Negotiations underway for future disposition. The Tennenbaum's proposed land exchange is being actively opposed by the Town of Vail. ENVIRONMENTAL Recycling: j ISSUES/ MANAGEMENT Town of Vail has committed the 1991 contribution budgeted at loading docks of the old post $14,100 for the second year. office to "We Recycle" for an interim period as well as a contribution of $12,300. • Joint Town of Vail and Actual cost to Town was $250. U.E.V.W. & S. compost Operated through September program to be on line by 1990. Will tentatively plan j 07/01/90. Cost to the Town to start up again May 1991. of $600. 3 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONMENTAL Staffing: Staff is developing Community Development is ISSUES/ a proposal to Council for an currently conducting MANAGEMENT Environmental Planner. third round of interviews. ' (CONTINUED) Phone interviews scheduled for 02/20/91. • Clean-up day was a success for $6,875.34 total cost for second straight year. pay-off to non-profit workers and picnic. • Look into use of recycled paper. $1,800 in 1991 budget for purchase of recycled copier paper. • Undergrounding electric East Vail Special District utilities. approved. Engineering j negotiations underway. 1 ~ Air Quality: I • Air Quality Report to be given to the Planning and Environmental Commission on July 9. Proposed ordinance changes for Council consideration in August. • Council recently adopted a no Restaurant compliance appears smoking ordinance. to be working well voluntarily. Council to review fall of 1991. 4 w GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONMENTAL Preliminary research and Ordinance 42, 1990 - passed ISSUES/ options have been presented 02/05/91. Staff working on MANAGEMENT to the Council on gas logs vs. policy for conversion of (CONTINUED) gas appliances. existing fireplaces. • A representative from the Done. No further action. State Health Department has met with the PEC to discuss ~ a possible format for. an air quality study. Water Quality: • No action has been taken. Waiting for the hiring of a Senior Environmental Policy Planner. Landscapinq: i ' Landscape Architect/Project See Todd Oppenheimer's Manager was hired in April. memorandum dated 12/13/90. 1 • Southwest entry to Ford Park Completed. has been designed by staff and approved by P.E.C. Currently being built. 5 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONMENTAL Staff design was completed for Lionshead Information Booth ISSUES/ the Lionshead Information Booth opened to public July 1990. MANAGEMENT as well as the Intermountain pool Intermountain pool site/park (CONTINUED) site. landscaped following completion of street improvement project in October 1990. Sprinkler system, sodding, and additional plantings to be completed spring 1991. • Architects are currently being Contract 90~ complete (trees, interviewed for the design of shrubs, wildflowers, ~ the East Vail Interchange irrigation - through contract landscaping project. with Sabells Landscape & Maintenance Co., Englewood) to be completed spring 1991. Additional moneys available to complete intersection project. Could be completed prior to winter 1991. Landscape and public improvements for VTRC - kick-off meeting 02/14/91 with all TOV interested parties (Ski Museum, snowplowers, PEC, DRB, Winston & Assoc., etc.) 6 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONEMENTAL Willow Bridge and Gore Creek ISSUES/ Promenade improvements MANAGEMENT scheduled for completion (CONTINUED) summer 1991. Snow Dump: • Access road to be designed Engineer is ready to begin and constructed in 1990. design as soon as lease is completed with Vail • An RFP will be prepared and Associates. Zoning approval sent on July 1 to qualified has to be obtained. engineering firms for design. Construction will be late summer or early fall 1991. • Final design and surveys will be completed April 1991. • Construction to start in spring of 1991. Since mid-1989, there has been an increased emphasis on code enforcement activities. Activity levels in some of the key areas are as follows: 7 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONMENTAL Trash: ISSUES/ MANAGEMENT 224 trash violations have been Code enforcement has had (CONTINUED) identified and warning letters difficult serving summons to issued since January 1. Enforcement absentee owners and a follow- steps are being developed. A policy up policy is required from statement relating to the public Larry and Ken regarding the . relations aspects of enforcement number of warnings vs. levels is also being discussed. summons. Have attempted to get Possible ordinance problems are compliance through education . also being identified for proposed in the summer of 1990 rather ordinance amendments. than through enforcement. Good voluntary compliance with containers in East Vail which has directly affected incidents with foraging bears „ _ and dogs. i 1 8 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS ENVIRONMENTAL Abandoned Vehicles: ISSUES/ MANAGEMENT Through cooperative efforts with 1990 Figures (CONTINUED) private homeowners, 82 abandoned vehicles have been identified and Tagged ..168* red tagged since January 1. 47 of Tagged & Claimed 11 these have been towed with the Tagged/Processed/Sold 71 balance in process. In addition, Remaining to be 69 other potential abandoned Processed from 1990 7 vehicles have been identified with their property owners being Total Vehicles 257 sought for notification. i *Upon follow-up, these ~ vehicles were moved or had some other disposition. ENVIRONMENTAL Animal Control: ISSUES/ MANAGEMENT 88 tickets have been issued since Computer on line providing (CONTINUED) January 1, resulting in the immediate identity by breed, impounding of 72 animals. This color, name, owner's infor- compares to 87 impounds in all mation, and zones. 200 of 1989. 1991 tags issued. Total for 1990 was 189. Suggested revisions for carriages, pet shops, and cruelty investig- ations in process. We euthanize less than 5~ of impounded animals. See Bob Slagle's memo dated 02/14/91. 9 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PARKING AND Arnie Ullevig from Felsburg, Holt Parking and Transportatin TRANSPORTATION and Ullevig was hired to complete Advisory Committee has the Master Transportation/Parking received final draft from Plan working with the Vail Arnie Ullevig. This will be Parking and Transportation Advisory presented to Council in a. Committee. joint meeting with PEC on February 26 and will address Ullevig has completed the initial all items listed. (Merv, community-wide review process for Peggy, and Lynn on Committee.) problem identification and potential solutions. Six primary agenda items were developed from these meetings. These are: 1. Delivery Service Operations 2. Parking Facilities 3. I-70 Access/Frontage Roads 4. Transit Services 5. Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 6. External Transit, Parking, I-70 Policy and Intergovernmental alternatives Alternatives and technical evaluations are being prepared for all six items as well as preliminary recommendations working in conjunction with the Parking ~ and Transportation Advisory Committee and concerned/affected resident or business persons. Meetings will be held throughout the summer and fall. 10 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PARKING AND To date, a public meeting has been TRANSPORTATION held on the Delivery/Service (CONTINUED) Operations. Alternative sites, different systems and/or enhancements to the present system were and are being evaluated. 40-50 people attended the meeting. Enhancements of the current delivery system appear to be the recommended solutions. The final draft of the Parking/ Transportation plan and public presentation will be held in September or October. A Colorado Department of Highways representative is on the Parking and Transportation Committee. Parkinq Fee Adjustments: The Annual increases in rates to Parking and Transportation be presented annually, rather Advisory Committee discussed this than assuming reactive as part of the Parking Facilities posture. meeting. The committee has developed recommendations to be brought forward to the Council. 11 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PARKINQ AND People Mover: Grant application Grants to do studies have been TRANSPORTATION has been partially completed. Process received with $13,000 (CONTINUED) is on hold until a determination on remaining for further study. whether or not to proceed comes out A greater likelihood of of the master planning process. redesigning buses to make loading and unloading easier is recommended. Estimated cost of People Mover to replace in-town shuttle route is $30-$35 million. Estimated cost to purchase redesigned buses and to make necessary road improvements is $7.5 million. i County-Wide Transportation: Eagle Election cancelled. Council County has completed their transit contributed $90,000 to advisory plan. A county-wide limited east end-of-county j election will be conducted in transportation for winter i August to raise sales taxes for the 1991. i implementation of this plan. Parking Structure: The addition/ Punch list to be completed by improvements to the Vail Village June 1991. Landscaping Parking Structure are under scheduled for summer 1991. construction and on schedule. 12 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PARKING AND Signage: Phase III (recreation path Ongoing. Scope of work being TRANSPORTATION signage) of the signage improvement considered. (CONTINUED) program will be installed in six to eight weeks. The street signage aspects of Phase III are in process. The consultant is developing ' recommendations to take to the Parking and Transportation Advisory Committee, DRB, and the Town Council. i AFFORDABLE Housing Task Force was created. Housing Task Force completed HOUSING Work program was developed. Focus goals and policies for housing ` groups were formed to receive in Vail. Housing Authority community-wide input. Affordable established January 1991. housing survey was authorized and Necessary zoning amendments has been completed. Final draft of are in process. the affordable housing survey will ~ be presented to the Housing Task Force in June. Will be meeting with I Council in late July or early August. t TOV has adopted an inducement Private developer claimed resolution which will enable bankruptcy in December, 1990. a private developer to seek private activity bonds through the State of Colorado for low- moderate income housing. 13 i GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PLANNING Municipal Building Complex: RELATED ISSUES RFP process was completed. Police Facility to proceed Architectural firm is hired on LHTRC. Proposed and has conducted a needs construction scheduled for . analysis and site review. 1993. Final report due in August. i 1 ~ Cemetery: 4 Final report nearing completion. Final report completed. Money Staff will schedule presentation allocated in budget to do a to the Council by the end of August. conceptual design for cemetery j and management structure. ~ Site selected is Donovan Park. Zoning Code Review: Tom Braun has been hired to conduct Changes to code underway. this review. GRFA and site coverage changes ~ finalized for low density ~ residential districts. Other ' amendments ongoing. i 14 f GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PLANNING Community Development Department RELATED ISSUES Staffing: (CONTINUED) Hiring of a Secretary/Receptionist Fully staffed as of July 9, is in process. All planning positions 1990, except for Environmental have been hired. Fully staffed on Health Specialist position. July 9, 1990. West Meadow Drive Design: The Town's Landscape Architect Project 70$ complete. is completing an RFP for final design. This project will be assigned to the new Senior Planner. Lionshead Plan: Staff recommends this be a 1991 Was not budgeted. Plan to be project to combine with the addressed in 1992. Public Art and Urban Design ~ Improvement projects. I 15 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS MARKETING Legal opinion as to mandatory Legal; however, economic and licensing of wholesale vendors policy impacts have been and contractors is not yet completed. presented to Council. A Council Work Session with the Town Marketing Board Permanent of Avon, Vail Associates, and the Funding Committee set up. Jim Vail Valley Marketing Board to Gibson is our representative. ~ discuss additional future funding Recommendations forthcoming. has not been set up at this time. a CHILD CARE The Eagle Valley Child Care Task Recommendations/report Force has completed its valley- presented September 1990. wide survey. Contributions for Council approved $4,000 all of the project costs have contribution for 1991. been pledged. The project report with recommendations is anticipated in late July. PARKS, RECREATION The last phase of the East Vail Construction of three-quarters PATHS, TRAILS Bike Path is now being designed. of East Vail bike path y Construction will start in September. .complete. Bighorn Creek The replacement of the old highway Bridge finished. bridge over Bighorn Creek is nearing completion which is the last part of the first phase of the East Vail Bike Path. ~ s 16 GOALS JUNE 1990 STATUS CURRENT STATUS PARKS, RECREATION Stephens Park to be rough-graded in Stephens Park Master Plan to PATHS, TRAILS 1990. Final design to be done by be approved 02/19/91 by Town (CONTINUED) spring of 1991. Project to be Council. Phased construction completed in the summer of 1991. to begin spring 1991. MAXIMIZE SALES Staff reported to the Council on the Cannot proceed to point-of- TAX COLLECTIONS legal clarifications between point-of- sale collection. sale and point-of-delivery sales tax collection options. OTHER Intermountain street improvement Intermountain street project project is on schedule. Bids were will be completed spring 1991 opened on June 19. Low bid was by and on or under budget. B & B, $40,000 under the engineer's estimate. Construction will start at the end of June, 1990. 1990 and 1991 buses are ordered. Three buses delivered Four buses will be delivered in October 1990 and four will October of 1990 and five buses be delivered in March 1991. will be delivered in February 1991. 17 SAMPLE • ~ow~ of nail 75 south frontage road veil, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2136 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO TOWN COUNCIL PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES WELCOME to this meeting of the Vail Town Council. The Town Council meets in regular session on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. This is a formal meeting of the Town Council, during which the Council takes official action on various items of business. These items are listed on the agenda on the reverse side. Each of these items has been studied by the Town staff and reviewed by the Town Council prior to this meeting. Listed below are participation guidelines adopted by the Council for you to observe when you wish to speak on any item: 1. Council adopted Resolution No. 9, Series of 1990, to encourage the following: a. No speaker shall be permitted to speak for longer than five minutes. b. No speaker shall be permitted to speak more than once on any subject until everyone desiring to be heard has been allowed to speak. c. When several individuals wish to express a shared opinion, it is encouraged they choose a spokesperson for that group. 2. Speakers should approach the microphone one at a time and be recognized by the Mayor before speaking. 3. Speakers should state their names and addresses and present their statement. 4. Speakers should limit their comments to the subject being addressed. 5. Any concerns or questions you may have which do not relate directly to a scheduled item on the agenda may be addressed to the Council at the beginning of the meeting under CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. The Council is prohibited from taking formal action on items not on the agenda except in emergency situations. If you wish to have an item considered by Council, please contact Ron Phillips, Town Manager, 479-2105, by the Thursday immediately preceding a Council meeting. , Please do not hesitate to state your particular viewpoint or to ask a question. The Council appreciates your attendance and participation at this meeting. Only with the support of citizens like you can our Town continue to progress. THIS WEEK'S AGENDA MAY BE FOUND ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THESE GUIDELINES. THANK YOU FOR COMING! VAIL TOWN COUNCIL . REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1991 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 2. Approval of Minutes of January 8, 1991, and January 15, 1991, Meetings. 3. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1991, first reading, an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 17.17 School Site Dedications; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 4. Resolution No. 9, Series of 1991, a resolution approving the Stephens Park Master Plan for the Town owned property located _ at the southeast corner of Kinnickinick Road and South Frontage Road West; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 5. Modification to the Town of Vai 1 Avalanche, Debri s F1 ow and Rockfal l Hazard Maps. 6. Resolutions No. 2-8, Series of 1991, Authorizing Town of Uail Staff to Purchase, Sell, and Resell Investments. 7. Agreement Between the Town of Vail, Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District and Vail Valley Consolidated Water District. 8. Adjournment f f TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE RULES OF ORDER 1. MAYOR/CHAIRMAN INTRODUCES AGENDA ITEM a. Staff Presentation - 10 Minutes or Less b. Applicant Presentation - 10 Minutes or Less, New Materials Not Reviewed By Staff Should Not Be Presented c. Audience Comments in Favor - 3 Minutes Each (State Name and Address, When Recognized By Mayor/Chairman d. Audience Comments In Opposition - 3 Minutes Each (State Name Etc.) e. Final Applicant Comments - Applicant Returns to Seat Afterward f. Final Staff Comments 2. COUNCIL/PLAfdtJING COMMISSION COMMENTS, ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, DISCUSSION 3. COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION l Bf ROBERT'S RULE! Oi OROlR DEBATE AND DECORUM i7 I Art. V. Debate and Decorum makes the real question before the assembly a different ~ i 3437.] one, and, in regard tb the right to debate, is treated as ~ anew question. Merely asking a question, or making a 34. Debate. 1~A a motion is made anfl secorl~l, it ; S~3 11 bP tat d by t hairrnan~ieFote bei Suggestion, is not considered as speaking. The maker , „ a ~ d1P=S~ r~ilebated of a motion, though he can vote against it, cannot speak ! . ' [see § 3]. When any member is a~ollt to speak in de- bate he shall rise and respectfully address himself to ~ against his own motion. "Mr. Chairman." ["Mr. President" is used where that 1 when an amendment is pending the debate must be ' is the designated title of tjle presiding officer; "Mr. ~ confined to the merits of the amendment, unless it is of ,,y. Moderator"t is more common in religious meetings. In such a nature that its decision practically decides the I ~'.j every case the presiding officer should be addressed by main question. The chairman cannot close the debate as long as any t, his official title.] The chairman shall then announce his member desires to speak, and should a member claim ','t,, name. By parliamentary, courte,yit the memberypon the floor after the chairman has risen to put the ques- whose motion a subiect is b;oLVht. ngtor~e,-,g,sembly tion or even after the affirmative vote has been taken, l.'•( ~ is lust entitled to the floor [see ~ 21 even t~ho~ugh an- i ~ ~ as3li~.e~ Jae Provided the negative has not been put, he has a right Y~ ~ ' other member has risen first an chair ; 'l; ;:`j£ ~ 1 to resume the debate or make a motion ; ~ t F,;: ~ ' 1'n case of a report of a committee it'is the member who a; ` ' presents the report] ; and he is also entitled to close the 35. Undebatabie Questions and those Opening the ? ~ ~ ..1. debate, but not until every member choosing to speak has Main Question to Debate. The following questions shall ~~r' ~ i spoken. When a member reports a measure from a com- be decided without debate, all others being debatable + . ~ mittee, he cannot in any way be deprived of his right to ' + ~ fKk close the debate; so if the previous question [§20] is ~ [see note at end of this section]: ~ . 'x To Fix the Time to which the Assembly ahali Adjourn t. r i; ordered the chairman at'once assi him the floor to , gns (when a privileged question, § 10). ~ ~ • close the debate. With this exception, no member shall To Adjourn 11], (or in committee, to rise, which is ' ~ rt, r;~ ,~4~ ~ ' ~ ad r ~I -•q speak more than twice to the same question lonly once used instead of to adjourn). ( f ' z . to a question of order § 14), nor longer than ten min- For the Orders of the Dag 13], and questions re- ~4 •r' ~C, ~ ~ ~ ' etas at nnP tires, without leave of the arse ,and ~ lating to the priority of btsiness. E ~ 1 ^ ; ~ ~l•,~ , ~ 4~~;:;, ~ the question upon granting the leave shalcided ~ An Appeai 14], when made while the Previous ; ; h~''t" ;C by a two-Zurds vote 19-39} without debate," If greater Question is pending, or when simply relating to inde- < ; :Y,~:~µ • sj:~, ;~'A;, creeaom is Desires, the ro er course is .to refer the corum or transgressions of the rules of speaking, or to ~ ;}.;'w~ t;f~,~'-: r the priority of business. ' ,•~t , .f + ; ±r''' subject to the committee of the whole 32], or to con- Objection to the Consideration of a Queatioyt 15]. " ° ' eider it informally 33]. [For limiting or closing the F~~ ` ~`f'' abate see § 37.] To Lay on the Tabie, or to Take from the Tabie ,1 ; . No member can speak the Second time to a question t ' •~'i''"~'• until every member choosing to speak has spoken. But The Previous Question 20]. ~ s , .r.°-. an amendment, or any other motion, being offered, To Reconsider 27] a question which is itself un- ` debatable. s 'E; ~ ; Questions relating to Iteadin o Pa ere 16 or , • In connection with tfiis section read tj 1-6. g ! p ~ ' ~ t "Brother Moderator" L more wmmonly wed in some seetlotu of the withdrawing 6 Motion 17], Or $ttspending the Rtti¢8 ~!J country ;but in suietneas of speech it implies en oRieial eQUallty between - 18] or extending the limits of debate 34], or ~imit- the epeal:er and the chairmen that does not etbt, or in other words ft Implies that they are both moderators. It a woman is In the chair, the only shown above, or dhninlahed m shown la { 87. In the U.S. House of ReDre- change In the ¦ddreea Is Dy eubatttutisg "Mrs." or "toles," w the ease may ' be, or "Madam;' for "Mr." Thw, "Mts. President.' eentatives no member eaa speak mare than once to the same Question, nor ' j The U.s. House of Representatives provides for thL by rain. longer than one hour. The fourth rule of the Senate is u follows: "No ~ n. senator sb,all speak more then twice Sn any ona debate, on the same day, , ' •;;,y ' ~1. ~ The limit in time should vary to suit circumstances, but the amk e! without leave of the Senate, which Question shall be decided without do- ` ~ ~ 2 F two speeches of tea minute each will usually answer !n ordinary fesam. bate:' It no rule b adopted, each member can spent but once to the same i r 1^ , r ~ bliss, sad when deatrabls, b7 a two•tbb da vo4 !L can be lacreased, ae ~ Question. ^ W '1 ~ x' a _ r ~ ~j, .,L' • !1 ROBERT'S RULES O~ OEDER DESATC ANO DlCORUM ~ ing or closing debate 37], or granting leave to Ill+utrations: To "Indefinitelq Postpone" Y4] a question continue his speech to one who has l+Pen guilty of ~ places it out of the power of the assembly to again take it up , indecortun is debate 36]. during that session, and consequently this motion allows of free ~j The motion to postpone to a certain time, 21] al- debate, even involving the whole merits of the original question. ,1 ~ lows of but very limited debate, which must becon- To "Postpone to a certain time" prevents the assembly taking fined tti the propriety of the postponement. When an up tiro question till the epedfied time, and. therefore allows of ' amendment is before the assembly the main question limited debate upon the propriety of the postponemena ~',~5 ~ cannot be debated excepting so far as it is necessarily ! 'To "Lay on fhe Table" leaves the question so that the as- ~ } involved in the amendment. But the following motions I eembly can at any time eonaider it, and therefore should not be, open to discussion the entire merits of the main Hues- i and is not debatable.• ~ ~ , ~ ~t • flan: I To "Commit" would not be very debatable. aeoording to this TO Commit 22]. I rule, but it is an exception, .because it is often important that ~ b~ • ~ the committee should. know the views of the assembly on the ~ rl,, n, To Post one Inds nifel 24 ~ ~ ' $ r p fi b uestion, and it therefore ie not only debatable, but opens to ~ ,fi , . , To Rescind 25]. q ~ To Reconsider a debatable question 27]. I debate the whole question which it is proposed to refer to the 1 a '~f; x g committee. ~ u~ i ~1~l~. ~r The distinction between debate and making sugges- i ~ t c, 36. Decorum In Debate (see § 2]. In debate a member ~ d 1 i,, a ~ bons or asking a question should always be kept in F $ view an when the latter will assist the assembl in must confine himself to the_questinn before the ~sQm- , ~ ~ Y ect u on any r , , , w~~ ; determining the question, is allowed, to a limited extent, ! ' bly, and avow personalities. He cane j} p ~ f , ; `k..?'. ~t :;;r , even though the question before the assembly is tin- -act of the assembly, ess nds to conclude his 'x ~ 4,i~[ +t, t ch acttdn or else i ~ i r> ' debatable. retitarics wirii a m ,l r • ~ ~ ; "while debatin st3fh motion. In re errutg to another a ~ a , t Nort ota Utvnrewri?sti• Qtramorts.=The English common par- member he should, as much as possible, avoid using i, `r~# 4i~.+•~•, ,eh.. liamentary law makes all motions debatable, unless there is a rule ~ " ~ ~ r ~r.: his name, rather referring to him as the member who r , ' ~.y;•i.,M4 ' . adopted limiting debate; but every assembly is obliged to ro- spoke last," or is some other way describing him. The i strict debate u n certain motions. The restrictions to debate - , '~k; 't ~ ~ p° officers of the assembly should always be referred to f~ prescribed in this section conform to the practice of Congress, ~ ~p,~ oflirial titles. It i8-not allowable to~a~ts,~jte ; ` where, however, it is very mmmon to allow of brief remarks f " ,a`; ~ motives of a member, but the nature or conseauemces of upon the moat undebatable questions, sometimes five or six ; members akin This, of course, is allowed oN when no a measure may ce cund"einneii i~ e~.on rms. It is not ~ t' ~;~a• l.1 °p` g' Y "'-'~tte man, ou~~Illtis'ISlll<€€- that is a subiect o~Elebate. • ~ one objects. u e~any ~-time the chairman rises to state a point of or- p•, ' , • } • By examining the above list it will be found that, while free , t ~ ~ der, or give information, or otherwise speak, within his r. ; ~ debate is allowed upon every prindpal question 6], it is per- v prohibited upon other questions is accordance with• privilege [see § 40], the member speaking must take i mitred or ~ his seat till the rhairTrtan has been first heard. When ' . the following prindplee: called to order, the member must sit down until the ~j (a) Highly privileged questions, as a rule, should not be de- F i• bated, as in that case they mold be used to prevent the assembly question of order 14 derided: H his remarks are decided • ~ ~ ~ from coming to a vote on the main question (for instance, if the to be ~r-~rer, he cannot proceed, if Bay one objects, " ;i~?y,'1' ; motion co adjourn were debatable, is could be used [see § 11] without the leave of the assembly expressed by a vote, . t in a way to greatly hinder business) .High privilege is, as a sole, upon which question there shall be no debate. ~ V incompatible with the right•o/ debate on the privileged question. Disorderl words should be taken down by the mom- yr;T~, ll,S.~. y • ~'~`YB,~ (b) A motion that has the effect to suppress a question before ber who objects to them, or by the clerk, tnd then read awz , the assembly, eo that it cannot again be taken up that session ~;P ~ - 42], allows of free debate; and a Subsidiary Motion to the member; if he denies them, the assembly shall .~,`t.~:'"; ~ :~;s,'~ decide by a vote whether they are his words or not. If . ~ ~ t•~•w . 7, except Commit, which see below], is debatable to just the ~ extent that it interferes with the right of the assembly to take a member cannot justify the words he used, sad will not up the original question at its pleasure. • gee Note at alone o! t 19 for abmes as this motion. ,i `ti row , ~ aw `i[~ .r' u ~ ~ 'i~AL~J.i' ~ p~h'••ll.w I I TO ROBERT'S RULES Oi OADER VOTt ,i,`' suitably apologize for using them, it is the duty of the p~~g question only, excepting where the Pending assembly to act in the case. If the disorderly words are motion is an amendment or a motion to commit, when of a personal nature, before the assembly proceeds to i it also applies to the question to be amended or tom- deliberate upon the case both parties to the personality milted unless it is demanded only on the amendment should retire, it being a general rule that no member or the motion to commit. When it is ordered on an should be present in the assembly when any matter amendment, or an amendment of an amendment, de- relating to himself is under debate. It is not, however, ~ bate is closed and the vote taken on the amendment, necessary for the member objecting to the words to re- when the effect of the previous question is then ex- hausted, and new amendments can be offered and Y• lire unless he is personally involved in the case. If any ~ , business has taken place since the member spoke, it is j debated. ' + too •late to take notice of any disorderly words he used. t (d) For the assembly to adopt an order (1) limiting During debate, and while the chairman is speaking, or ~ debate upon a special subject, either as to the number ' the assembly is engaged in voting, no member is per- ~ or length of speeches; or (2) closing •debate upon the '~r milted to disturb the assembly by whispering, or walk- ~ subject at a stated time, when all pending questions ing across the floor, or in any other way. shall be put to vote without further debate. Either of :°'i Led simply to a pending { 37. Closing. Debate. Debate upon a question is not ~ these two measures may be aPP ~ ' closed by the chairman rising to put the question, as, amendment, or an amendment thereto; and when this 4~; until both the affirmative and negative are put, a mem- is voted upon, the original question is still open to de- r her can claim the floor, and reopen debate [see § 38]. bate and amendment. _ Debate can be closed b the followin motions " which ~ ~ . ' Y g , ~ „a;• are undebatable 35], and, except to Lay on the Art•Vi•Yota ,7, ,!R~, Table, shall require atwo-thirdst vote for their adop- [g~ 38, 39.] ! .:a;;~, lion 39]: '1i 'i`"`' ' ~ 38. Voting. Whenever from the nature of the question ; ~ (a) An Ob3eetion to the Consideration of a Question it permits of no modification or debate, the chairman • ! r~ y . ~ , ' 15], which is allowable only when the question is ilnmediately puts it to vote; if the question is debatable, x~ first introduced, and if sustained, not only stops debate, ~ when the chairman thinks the debate has been brought ` ~ ~ ' + but also throws the subject out of the assembly for that Y session 42]; which latter effect is the one for which ~ a close he should inquire if the assepmbly is read for a '1 _ it was designed. the question, and if no one rises he uts the question ~ " ~'r, to vote. There are various forms for putting the ques- a~ (b) To Lay on the Table 19], which, if adopted, lion in use in different parts of the country. The rule j:~ 'sy. < r~' carries the question to the table, from which it cannot in Congress, in the House of Representatives, requires ~ , ' be taken unless a majority favor such action. ? questions to be put as follows: "As many as are in , sa a e" and after ~ -..us ~~HS } (c~ The Previous euestion 20], which, if pied, favor [as the question may be] Y P , ~ ~o;~,,.':(,; y Via, cuts otl debate, and brings the assem y to a vote on the the affirmative voice is expressed. `.`As many ~ m'e B ii a~4~s ~ ~l o osed sa no. The following form is very c.........on: +y~~4A f • It will be noticed that the Brat two of these motions only close debate app Y here state the ~ 4~ F i , by virtue of their su,,,.... ,lag the pueetion itself. The clreumsuneea under It has been moved and seconded that [ + a ~~k as many as are 'in favor of the motion say , p, wbic6 each o1 these motions t0 suvvreas debate and to su,., . the puce- QtleStiOD] , ; •i ~;r`„ ` ' m~:: 'l; ' lions should be seed, are e:p4ined in { f se. ss, ~ a e • those opposed n0. Or, if the motion is for adoption ~ y .f..; ; t In the v.s. sous" of R . , cativea, where oath syeaker e.n ocenDy of s certain resolution, after it has been read the chair- "~,x +z r; a ; r i the Boor one boor, any of these motions to cut ofl debate can'be adopted + u c ~ + 1 man can sa "You have heard the resolution xead• ~ll ~ ~ ~ ie. ` -z i r`t r,• ~by s mere malority, hnt Dractleally they era not used until after soma I,! b;; ~ aeb.te; Rule 28, 8, H.R.• a:Dteeely pmvtdea that rerty minutes, twenty those in fa or of its adoption will hold up the right F. nn „ , ;i w ~ M:~ on each side shall be showed for debates wbeneve: the Drevious puestlon b hand• those opposed will manifest it by the same sign. f R, • ,!'.',r'~ ' .t~1 ordered on a Drope6ition on which there 6es been no debate, aT when the ' • E ,y,,,.:~ t,t ' rules are suspended. In ordinary eoeietiee harmony to w essential that a These examples are sufficient to show the usual meth- `~F+ri~ t ! • two-thirds vote should be reQUlred to force the asxmbly to a Sna1 vob c` ; 9~•~~.! • 86 and aLo the Table a! Rtilea, a• 14. ~ ~ et ~UnR ~`i'~' r., :4 ~ without allowing free deb?q [acs not. to j IIBI. ~ and u~ttlnQ certain Queetiona. r ~ 9 ' + ' ~;i'~t' . n K. ~ :;~s t . , r~ RESOLUTION N0. 9 Series of 1990 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to make public hearings held become more efficient and less lengthy by adopting certain rules governing public hearings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, as follows: 1. Before any speaker shall be permitted to speak, the Mayor, Mayor Pro-Tem, or any other Chairman of the meeting shall announce a time limitation, and all speakers shall adhere strictly to such limitation. However, no speaker shall be permitted to speak for longer than five minutes, exclusive of time required to answer questions of Councilmembers, except upon the affirmative vote of the majority of the members of Council present. No speaker shall be permitted to speak more than once on any subject until everyone desiring to be heard has been allowed to speak. 2. When several individuals wish to express a shared opinion, it is encouraged that they choose a spokesman to speak for all members of the group. INTRODUCED., READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 1990. ~ ~!~G ~~L~J ~iC Kent R`. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk TOWN OF PAIL - 7S Sortb Frontagc Road ~ Dcpartmcnt of Public Worlrr/Transportation Vail, Colorado 8165? 303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Berryman FROM: Todd Oppenheimer DATE: December 13, 1990 RE: Winter Project Schedule Per your request Z have attached the list of projects that I will be working on and/or involved with this winter. I have tried to break each project down by task to give you an idea of the scope of work involved. The hours involved are very rough estimates as many of these projects are conceptual in nature at this time. Z hope this helps to answer some of the concerns which have been raised. If you need additional information just let me know. cc: Ron Phillips PROJECT: Stephen's Park Design DESCRIPTION: Planning, design, construction documentation for a twelve acre neighborhood park facility in West Vail. TASKS: 1. Hire survey consultant and prepare base maps. 2. Coordinate abandonment and redescription of all utility easements and right-of-ways. 3. Schedule and coordinate public input meetings. 4. Coordinate and direct work of design consultant in preparing preliminary, alternate plans and final masterplan. 5. Schedule and coordinate presentation to DRB, PEC and Council. 6. Coordinate and direct work of design consultant in preparing construction documents (plans and specifications). 7. Solicit bids and select contractor. 8. Manage construction contract. TIME ESTIMATE: Ten to twenty hours per week for sixteen weeks PROJECT: Village Transportation Center Landscape Improvements DESCRIPTION: Revisions and redesign of VTRC landscape improvement plans prepared by Civitas. Existing plans do not adequately address aesthetic concerns and functional requirements such as snow storage and removal. TASKS: 1. Perform photo survey of views to and from the structure. 2 2. Discuss functional requirements with structure managers and _ equipment operators. 3. Review existing plans and compare them with #1 and #2 above. 4. Redesign landscape improvements and revise plans as required. 5. Schedule and coordinate presentations to DRB, PEC and Council. 6. Prepare new set of construction documents (using as much of the old set as possible). 7. Solicit bids and select contractor. 8. Manage construction contract. TIME ESTIMATE: Twenty to Thirty hours per week for twelve to sixteen weeks PROJECT: Gore Creek Promenade Improvements DESCRIPTION: ` Planning, design and construction documentation for landscape and drainage improvements to the Gore Creek Promenade area.. TASKS: 1. Prepare base maps from survey provided by hired survey consultant. 2. Meet with Town of Vail staff and assess problems. 3. Coordinate with Town Engineer on Willow Bridge project. 4. Schedule public input meeting to discuss problems and design alternatives. 5. Schedule and coordinate presentations to DRB, PEC and Council. 6. Prepare construction documents required (scope depends on contracted or possible in-house construction). 7. Manage/coordinate construction activities. 3 r TIME ESTIMATE: ' Ten to thirty hours per week for eight to ten weeks PROJECT: Landscape Improvement Plan - East Vail DESCRIPTION: Completion of Phase II construction of landscape improvements to the East Vail Interchange (planning, design, and construction documentation of 1992 construction will be a summer project). TASKS: 1. Review and revise East Vail Construction Documents for Phase II construction. 2. Negotiate contract price for Phase II with Phase I contractor. 3. Manage construction contract. TIME ESTIMATE: Eight to twelve hours per week for three to four weeks PROJECT: Ski Museum Site DESCRIPTION: Planning, design and construction documentation for construction of a pocket park or pedestrian plaza. TASKS: 1. Prepare base maps from survey provided by hired survey consultant. 2. Meet with Town of Vail staff to discuss alternatives and coordinate with streetscape consultant. 3. Prepare graphic plan alterative and meet with Town of Vail staff again to discuss. 4. Schedule and coordinate DRB, PEC and Council presentations. 5. Prepare construction documents. 4 6. Solicit bids and select contractor. 7. Manage construction contract. TIME ESTIMATE: Ten to thirty hours per week for six to eight weeks PROJECT: Athletic Field Restrooms DESCRIPTION: A joint project with VMRD and possibly VA to design and build a restroom/locker room facility at the Soccer Field above Ford Park . TASKS: 1. Work with VMRD/VA on project planning and hiring of architectural consultant. 2. Review project designs provide input back to architect. 3. Prepare landscape improvement plans for facility. 4. Attend DRB meetings and make presentations as required. 5. Assist in monitoring construction contract as necessary to protect Town of Vail interest and investment. TIME ESTIMATE: Four to eight hours per week for twelve to sixteen weeks PROJECT: Flower bed design DESCRIPTION: Planning and design for approximately two hundred Town of Vail flower beds. TASKS: f 1. Begin preparation~of base maps from aerial photos and other sources (the services of a surveyor would be useful in some instances but is not budgeted). 2. Prepare bed designs and select plant materials. 5 3. Solicit quotes from nurseries_ and plant wholesalers and place orders for material. TIME ESTIMATE: Four to eight hours per week for an undetermined period PROJECT: Snow Dump DESCRIPTION: Aesthetic and revegetation aspects of Snow Dump project TASKS: 1. Work with Town Engineer and hired consultants regarding aesthetic/visual mitigation of snow dump and revegetation of site. 2. Review documents and attend meetings as required. TIME ESTIMATE: Four to eight hours per week for six to eight weeks PROJECT: Village and Meadow Drive Streetscape Plan DESCRIPTION Involvement with Community Development and consultant in planning and design of Village and Meadow Drive Streetscape Improvement Plans. TASKS: 1. Attend planning and public input meetings. Be involved in the process and provide input where appropriate. 2. Review illustrations and documents provided by consultants. TIME ESTIMATE: Four to eight hours per week for an undetermined period: 6 MEMO TO: PAM BRANDMEYER DATE: 14 FEB R1 FROM: 80B BEADLE RE6ARDIN6: OVERVIEW OF ANIMAL CONTROL 1990 A NEW ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER JOINED THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT IN AU6UST OF 1990. AT THAT TIME A 6OALlPURP05E STATEMENT WAS FORMED KITH OBJECTIVES AND AN ACTION PLAN. PLEASE REFER TD EXHIBIT 1. ALL OBJECTIVE5 AND PLAN5 ARE IMPLEMENTED AND CURRENT. SOME INTERESTING FACTS ARE NOTED IN COMPILING DRTA FOR THIS REPORT; FOR 1990 FDR JAN.1991 COURT ACTION; ARRAIGNMENTS: lb5 27 COURT RECEIPTS: f 8,050. x 1,203 FINANCE DEPT: TDV TA65: 181 195 TA6 RECEIPTS: f 2,470. f 540. TOTAL COMPLAINTS HANDLED FDR YEAR: COMPLAINTS HANDLED 8-90 THRU 12-90: TOTAL ANIMAL5 IMPOUNDED FROM VAIL: VAIL ANIMALS EUTHANIZED FDR YEAR 1990; 2 f 1 THIS I5 AN EXCEPTIONALLY LOW FIGURE AND WOULD RANK OUR ADOPTIVE/REDEMPTIVE PROGRAM AS ONE OF THE BEST NATIONALLY! (INCIDENTALLY BOTH ANIMALS WERE NOT ADOPTABLE DUE TD HEALTH AND DISPOSITIONI pS OF THI5 GATE ANEW COMPUTER PROGRAM HAS BEEN BROUGHT ON LINE. THIS PR06RAM WILL GREATLY FACILITATE SEARCH AND IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES AND RECORD KEEPING FOR OUR TOWN'S ANIMALS AND THEIR OWNER'S. ADDITIONALLY THIS PR06RAM WILL LEND IT5ELF TD OTHER CODE ENFORCEMENT OPERATION5 AS WELL AS TIE INTO OUR CAD PR06RAMS IN D25PATCH. A PUBLIC FORUM FDR ANIMAL CONTROL IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH OF 1991. A WELL DE5I6NED BROCHURE HAS BEEN PREPARED 6IVIN6 A 5YNOP5I5 OF OUR CURRENT REGULATIONS. SOME REVISION AND ADDITION TD OUR REGULATIONS ARE IN THE PROCE55 AND SHOULD 8E READY FOR PRESENTATION TO THE COUNCIL BY THE END DF MARCH 1991. EDUCATIONAL PRD6RAMS FOR OUR SGHOOL5 AND SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS ARE NEARLY COMPLETED AND WIII BE READY FDR PRESENTATION BY APRIL 1991. WITH THE CONTINUED RECOGNITION DF THE ANIMAL CONTROL FR06RAM, TOWN OF VAIL IS REGULARLY CONSULTED BY OTHER AGENCIES FOR INPUT IN REGARDS TD SOME VERY INTERE5TIN6 PROBLEMS. AS OF THIS DATE TQV HAS THE ONLY STATE CERTIFIED CRUELTY INVE5TI6ATOR IN EAGLE COUNTY. REGULARLY WE ARE CONTACTED TO LEND A5SI5TANCE IN UERIFYIN6 AND RESOLVING PROBLEMS THAT ARISE IN THE COUNTY. WHILE THIS ACTIVITY DOES NDT REBUIRE MUCH TIME IT GOES GARNER VERY POSITIVE RECOGNITION FOR US. A MONTHLY ARTICLE IN THE VAIL TRAIL TITLED °TAILS OF VAIL°, SCHEDULED FOR THE SPRING, SHOULD ALSO BE A POSITIVE FOR OUR TOWN. ,~y town ofi nail 75 south frontage road office of community development veil, Colorado 81657 (303)479-2138 (303)479-2139 Dear Vail Resident or Guest: In an attempt to maintain the quality of life in Vail and to ensure the beauty of our community, we are taking several proactive steps to deal with the ongoing problem of trash. The Town of Vail, through its Code Enforcement Officers employed by the Police Department, will monitor the trash situation and supplement the activities of the Animal Control Officer. This is necessary in that roaming animals can often be directly linked to strewn trash. The solution to the problem, therefore, requires that all of us work together. The Town of Vail requires all trash which is placed outside for collection to be placed in containers :equipped with tight fitting lids. This prevents the garbage from being spread by animals (dogs, birds, squirrels, etc.), which can easily destroy plastic bags. A certain amount of discretion may be used during periods where one has large amounts of garbage; i.e. guests, holidays, etc., but the rule should generally be that all trash should be in containers while placed out for collection. If you do not currently have garbage cans or those you do have need replacement, you are encouraged to make the arrangements necessary to get proper containers. Should your trash company be BFI, they can provide you with a wheeled container fora minimal monthly fee. This letter is being left with you because your trash was observed as being improperly contained prior to collection. . This courtesy letter serves as a warning notice requesting your y, future voluntary compliance with our Municipal Code. Future code violations could result in a summons requiring your ;,:appearance in the Municipal Court. We are looking forward to your cooperation in this effort to enhance the appearance of our community. Should you. have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, Su an Scanlan Environmental Health Officer ~ - efcRc°d ~ R~f~ r+~~fTi Cy?~1 Rai ~iP4bl tlf~l~P `J /t'i ~ - .o - A futurist and snow country homeowner raises hackles with his theory.that~~-:~-~= : = . . Lim'.. - ~ By Andrew Nemethy ~ - estruction is usually associated with unexpected• natural disasters. But according to futurist Au- ~ { ,4_, gust St. John, "destruction" is perfectly natu- s ~®~O~ ral-indeed, inevitable-for resort and tourist towns. ~ ~ - St. John is a professor of marketing and future stud- ~~~~~4(~~~ • ies at Long Island University in New York. He has ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ Y: developed a comprehensive theory on the life and • 6, ~a _ - death of tourist towns, which he says go through a ,,~~.s,,~H~~G~~vr , cycle of five stages: Welcome, Development, Resent- t, Confrontation and finally. Destruction. . - ~~a„iE~:~; It's the last stage, not surprisingly, that has raised ' - _ eyebrows. By "destruction," St. John doesn't mean a ~ physical catastrophe, but the ruin or disappearance, as ; ^ ~ ~ growth overwhelms a resort area, of the things that h ~ f were the original attractions: neighborliness and sense r~sT~VG~io / of community, a rura-7"landscape, small-town atmo- s- < ~ ~ r f4~• sphere, i i tmess;TbW ra is an ow taxes. _ As this occiars_ he says, communities break into hos- _ the camps over development. lxrowth moratorriams, D[vEa_0.,, ENT ~~~Y:~::.... t ~ ~ lawsuits and contentious hearings often ensue. Many . _;:a residents hn ~e can no !on ~er afford to live and ~ ~ ~ ~ `y~Y~~k` Y g .I ~ f x.. .shop m their town. raced with constant ixrit~,~s.~ ~ - - ``-fi°~=- 1 r remind them of their~iLuatien-~fic ids. soarin~• ~ i ~ rents-locals wear resentm n . on .h .ir sleeves. ~I • t ~ .j. And on their bumpers. In the resort community of Manchester, Vermont, where St. John has had a home T~~ona~a0ni?ATioN. since 1962 cars s ort stickers sa 'n "Welcome to ~ ~ ~ S P Yl g~ , RESEtY'1'N~NT ' " Manchester. Now Go Home." ~ This is obviously no way for a resort to greet tour- Prof. August St. John ponders his kve phase cycle dr+esort torahs. fists, but St. John says Manchester is in the Destruc- tion Stage and this kind of animosity is typical. Not surprisingly, local powers-that-be vehemently dis- saying. It's not better or worse. It's just different." agree. They call him names, such as "Professor Gloom- Though his tourism cycle is based on five years of and-Doom." St. John has been branded everything studying Manchester, he says it applies to resort com- ` from pro-development to anti-development, and ac- munities everywhere. Manchester has been an ideal cused of having a "hidden agenda" by the president of guinea pig, St. John says, because it has virtually nearby Bromley and Magic Mountain ski areas. every facet of a tourism-based economy. The town has f He takes it all in stride, insisting he isn't taking a business sector dependent on tourists, imported sides, just telling it like it is. workers who service the resort trade, old-wealth sum- "Everything has patterns," St. John says. "Every- mer residents, affluent newcomers, developers, as- thing changes if you wait long enough. If something is sorted professionals and long-time natives. hot, you wait long enough, it's cold. That's all I'm It has a historic, 150-year-old resort village domi- nated by the sprawling, restored Equinox Hotel It's A freelance writer living in the hills near Montpelier, also home to a booming commercial center with l,he Vermont, Andrew Nemethy has wit~aessed 20 years of upscale fishing and clothing company Orvis, all man- changes in Green Mountain resort taurns. her of outlet stores and boutiques, and grand develop- SNOW COUNTRY/NOVEMBER 1990 31 kESORTS GO UP ...AND DOWN continued ` = ~ . - ',i ` , ~ s. ment schemes. And three ski resorts are nearb ~ r Nrr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Stratton, Bromley and Magic Mountain. - Most of the flak St. John faces comes from his use of ~ F~GlIRiNG A tl[JVRI S SIf~17E .`rt=,.=:~ the word "destruction," but he says this stage isn't all { ; # ' . i V A ~ i'' ,h ~ _ ~ ~ ne tive. It can also be "creative" and a "rebirth " `Y ` b''a ~ Professor August St. do ~ devised a survey,' excerpt;; once a community realizes its original draw has disap- ~ : ed below,. to pinpoint development phase_gf a re=':'~`.: peared and "something else has to be put in its place." sort town. R:ar...~len rate the accuracy of the'fo1=~.~,' But if negative attitudes toward tourists do not change Towing statements on .scale of U (never har,,~ to7` J and conflicts remain, "there's no guarantee once you " (always happens) fo any small resort town. The ta~al hit bottom that you can come back." nts categorize t town in orie of five~stagea ~ St. John, 62, a tanned, animated man with a neat ,~1, Name-verbi . Residents.of other areas turn the salt-and- a er moustache and a va a resemblance . town's name into verb (as in Freeport, Maine):. Ex P PP ~ ample: "Don't `Freeport' our town." ~ ~ - _ ~ . to Sean Connery, is an unlikely lightning rod. He has ~ 2, Teflon officials. Difficult or confusing to place ' spent most of his career teaching or consulting quietly ? responsibility for a town's growth pattern on elected behind the scenes, using his background in economics, ~ or appointed officials.. Example: "Who's in chamge ~ . sociology, Psychology and marketing. arOU''~ here? ~ ; ~ : ' Cycles fascinate St. John, much as statistics thrill a 3. Growth backlash. Growth reaches a point~where _ baseball fanatic. He points out that as far back as 500 a town s development no longer pulls people in, but, pushes people out. Example: The ruw.l simplicity; ~ B.C., his favorite Greek philosopher, Heraclitus "The historic chamcter, charm ar mystique is erodzd by ' ~ . ' Obscure," said everything is always in "flux," and that pockets ofglitzy adornment and Glutter.._ _ ~ ~ ' "one cannot step tw~ira inn .h samg river." 4. Character flip-flop. The character of a town no = Y Tourism communities must realize their business is longer affects growth decisions, rather growth deci- in a state of flux and not immune to cycles, says St. lions affect the character of the town. Example:._ . John. Sitting underneath the dark, exposed beams of Commercial pro~eds such as malls, shopping centers, strip development, subdivisions, etc.; domirwte the;;.;-':. an old, restored carriage barn that is his home, he ' , tournscape joverrill visual impressia?i), riot the other r:' redicts man chan es for ski and resort areas: 3 ~ ~ P y g way a~round::;<::-:..,:N ~~M , ~ r - •`Where are only going to be two types of ski resort: 5. The "window effed." New arrivals view the ` The very expensive ante` very cheap." Ski resorts in town as it is, not what it was or should be. Example: - the mraare Lace drthculty and some will go bankrupt. As historic architecticml heritage is consumed by a • "People today want their rrionev's worth." Ski eontempomry motif, the new arrivals see the present areas have to deliver value to survive, whether it's. a tournscape and adapt accordingly~As this process of decent hamburger or coupons that give a discount at dwindling arChitectuml heritage continues, chang- ,xng profiles ojthe tosmr, unfold. local restaurants: 6. From feverish to sick. The "have-notb" will - • Fancy resorts that cater to the cream of the mar- "never have." Example: Land values soar andlor af- ; ket have to "savor the customer" and cpn~an+„r;~ less fordable housing becomes prohibitive. r on capital investment and ~,,rP nl, gervirn "'r'~y'Ve 7. Departure of posh. Quality market replaced by a got the apple: They better start shim.." quantity market. Example: Clutter, retail glitz and He points ou- t t~ 20 years ago no one ever imag- .fit food restaurants dom.i~w~te the tourn; "upscale" , fined going to a ski resort and "never putting on skis." shoppers depart and "middlellow-end" amve. S. A new template. A general consensus that the But a long list of activities and amenities now provide town has changed. Example: The room's new look is ~ plenty of diversions to attract non-skiers. better to some, worse to others, different to all. ' "The concept is wider. It's not just skiing," he says. 9. A bitter pill. Present "high" prices of real estate Some communities fail to recognize that as growth make past "lower" prices, to most previous sellers, a occurs, the local economy becomes driven less by tour- resentful memory. ism than by development and a phalanx of architects, 10. Wishful thinking. Traffic activity does not lawyers, planners, contractors and Pngl~gr~ W~ equal business activity. Example: Roads chob-ed with development runs out of steam, the r is ~y_trippers bound for other destinations. / Total. 0 to 10 =Welcome stage; l l to 21 = Devel- forced to confront orl-w to nomy. opment stage; 22 to 32 =Resentment stage; 33 to 43 While he insists that going from the "welcome" to =Confrontation stage; 44 to 50 =Destruction stage. "destruction" stage is inevitable, St. John says active plarimng can prolong and coi~rol the progression by hey),a, [li ese~ ve a resort town's aooeai,ann rhara~rar. so communities can find out where they fit in his five- ' "It'~like the difference between two people. One of stage cycle (see accalrzpanying box). Using the infor- them stays fit and takes care of himself, the other matron, a community can look ahead and plan. drinks and gets dissipated," he says. "The future of the future," he says, sounding like a St. John has developed a way to rate local attitudes modern-day Heraclitus, "is in the present." ~ 32 SNOW COUNTRY/NOVEMBER 1990