Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-14 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, May 14, 1991 2:00 P. M. AGENDA 1. PEC Report. 2. Joint Council and Planning Commission work session regarding fireplace issue. ` 3. West Intermountain Annexation. 4. Update on Art In Public Places Village Transportation Center Project; discussion of possible funding mechanisms for AIPP program. 5. Lionshead Merchants Banner Request. 6. Information Update. 7. Other. 8. Adjournment. C:\WSAGENDA VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 14, 1991 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 p.m. 1. PEC Report. 2:10 p.m. 2. Joint Council and Planning Commission Susan Scanlan Work Session regarding fireplace issue as it relates to research information presented during April 23rd work session. Action Reauested of Council: The staff asks that Council give direction on the research presented during the April 23rd work session as it relates to policy recommendations for a retrofit program, a public education program and any changes to be made to the existing ordinance. Background Rationale: Staff has been doing research relating to the fireplace issue; specifically in relation to the new technology stoves and gas fired units to develop a good basis of information for a public education program and a retrofit program. This information was presented at the April 23 work session and Council was asked to consider it as well as seek public input before making any decisions. Staff Recommendation: Please see staff memo. 2:55 p.m. 3. West Intermountain Annexation Larry/Steve Item/Tonic: West Intermountain annexation. Action Reauested of Council: Give direction to staff on how to proceed with West Intermountain annexation. Background Rationale: No one from the West Intermountain area has been willing to pursue the steps required for annexation. It appears that if petitions are to be circulated it will have to be done by the Town. Staff Recommendation: None. 3:10 4. Art In Public Places Shelly Mello Item/Tonic: Update on Art In Public Places project proposed for the Village Parking Structure; discussion of possible funding mechanisms for AIPP program. Action Reauested of Council: Recommendation to proceed with project; recommendation on how to proceed with possible funding. Background Rationale: Please see attached information. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposal. 3:25 p.m. 5. Lionshead Merchants Banner Request Betsy Rosolack Item/Topic: A request from the Lionshead Merchants Association concerning banners. Action Requested of Council: Grant or deny permission to proceed to DRB. Background Rationale: The request is to allow the merchants to use the east Lionshead banner location for a banner that welcomes people to Lionshead. The banner would remain in place when the supporting poles are not being used by other banners. Staff Recommendation: To allow the merchants to proceed to DRB. 3:35 p.m. 6. Information Update 7. Other 8. Adjournment C:\wsExpand e ' ~,;,9'. MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Arts in Public Places DATE: May 14, 1991 SUBJECT: AIPP's Village Transportation Center Art Project -x.::.,,.,::,,::.::.::.:::,,.::,.,.. ,,:,,,.,,.,~.,k,,..,,,.,.. / . :ilr:, The AIPP Board is seeking final approval of the attached proposal for the siting of an art piece at the Village Transportation Center. The area of the project has been determined to be the main stair corridor. No specific type of art piece has been specified. Three finalists will be chosen in July to develop a specific proposal. A final artist will be chosen in October. The artist, Board and the community, through a series of public meetings, will develop the final design. Currently, we are preparing for the submittal of an National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grant request. We will submit for this in October, and will receive confirmation in June, 1992, with the funds being available in July, 1992, if approved. The request will be for $30,000, which is half of the project budget. The Board proposes to raise the remaining $30,000 through cash and in-kind gifts and other available grants. We now have approximately $9,500 as a result of the 1991 budget allocation. Should the NEA grant request be denied, construction of the project will be delayed until all funds can be raised by the AIPP Board. ' ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSAL for THE MAIN STAIR CORRIDOR AT NEW VAIL VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION CENTER A. PROJECT CONCEPT The Town of Vail, Colorado, Art in Public Places Board (AIPP) and Town Council wish to commission a professional artist or artist/design team to create a site specific artwork for the main pedestrian stairway of the new Vail Village Transportation Center. The Vail community recognizes that public art often significantly alters public places by becoming a major new presence in the environment. It is our intent to commission a piece of art which is reflective of the nature of the community. The AIPP is seeking a professional artist or design team who is interested in creating an artwork of highest quality. The artist will be chosen through a professional jury process. Phase II finalists will meet with the Vail community during the development of final proposals. Each finalist will be paid a retainer fee for idea development. The use of various materials is encouraged. B. SITE DESCRIPTION The Vail Village Transportation Center, renovated in 1990, is the gateway to Vail Village, the United States' largest skiing complex and year-round destination resort. The structure is the major hub of Vail and enjoys an estimated 1 million visitors per year. Those circulating through the structure include automobile users, public transportation users and pedestrians. Local citizens, day visitors and destination visitors use the transportation structure. The Vail Information Center and U.S. Ski Heritage Center are also located in the structure. The open air stairway begins at the top deck of the parking structure and extends down to Slifer Plaza and fountain. Beautiful views from the stairway focus on significant landmarks in the community, such as the Covered Bridge, Clock Tower and ski mountain. A series of plazas have been built at different levels of the stair. Accessways to the levels of parking also connect into the main stair corridor. The community would like to incorporate artwork into the structure's main pedestrian way so that the experience of entering Vail Village becomes more memorable and welcoming. It is our intent to reflect the community's value placed on cultural excellence in this high visibility location. The artist will be responsible for documenting safety levels and maintenance standards of all materials. Each artist or team shall address such practical concerns as pedestrian safety, snow removal, and maintenance implications of the design for the final phase. C. TYPE OF COMPETITION Open Competition: The artist selection process is open to all interested artists who will be notified by advertisement and in some cases by invitation. Special attention will be given to those artists with demonstrated experience in community involvement and experience in facilitating a community vision during development of public art projects. More specific selection criteria follow in Section F of the proposal. No fees will be paid to artists for their initial submissions. A maximum of three finalists will be selected to submit detailed maquettes for the project. Each of the three finalists shall be paid for their Phase II submittal. D. ELIGIBILITY All professional artists are eligible to submit a proposal either individually or as a team with other artists or designers. Any design team shall include at least one professional artist. E. PROJECT PROCESS Budaet: $60,000.00 Schedule: Call to Artists released: Mav. 1991 Phase I Deadline: Julv 1, 1991 Selection of Phase II Finalists: Julv 21, 1991 Selection of Final Artist or team: October 1, 1991 Presentation to AIPP and Town Council for Final Proiect Approval: June. 1992 Construction of Proiect July. 1992 Completion of Proiect: Auaust. 1992 Dedication of piece: Sept., 1992 (This schedule is subject to change) Phase I 1. A call to artists is issued through advertisement and invitation. Information about the project is released to the media. Detailed proposal packets are mailed to interested artists. A public meeting will be held with the community to determine their desires and needs. 2. Resumes and slide examples of works are collected from interested artists. (See Section I for detailed submittal requirements.) 2 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION t May 13, 1991 AGENDA 11:15 Worksession 12:00 Site visits 2:00 Public Hearing Site Visits ' Worksession 1. Update by Holy Cross Electric Association regarding an amendment to 1990 Master Plan to underground electrical lines. Applicant: Holy Cross Electric 2. Update on Municipal Complex, Phase I. Ken Hughey/Mike Mollica Public Hearing 4. 1. A request for an exterior alteration, Concert Hall Plaza, Lot 1, Lionshead 4th Filing/616 W. Lionshead Plaza. Applicant: Vail Investment Company. 2. 2. A request for a setback variance for the Stork Residence, Lot 23, Block B, Vail Ridge/2605 Davos Trail Applicant: Otto Stork 6. 3. A request for a minor subdivision for Lots A, B and C, Vail Village 7th Filing/595 E. Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Manor Vail 3. 4. A request for wall height and front setback variances for the Neuswanger Residence, Lot 6, Block B, Vail Ridge/2642 Cortina Lane. Applicant: Chris Neuswanger 1. 5. A request for a Special Development District for the Days Inn site, 2211 N. Frontage Road/ Lot 1, Block A, Vail Das Schone Third Filing, a resubdivision of Vail Das Schone First Filing. Applicant: Peter Jacobs of Days Inn TABLED TO MAY 20, 1991 ,fit 6. A request for a conditional use permit to allow for construction of Stephens Park in the Greenbelt/Natural Open Space zone district. The park area is more specifically described as follows: Platted government lots 13, 23 and 24, Township 5 South, Range 1 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, NW 1/4 of Section 14, Eagle County, Colorado. Applicant: Town of Vail 7. 7. A request to change the Land Use Plan designation of a property generally located west of the Town of Vail Public Works shops from Open Space to Semi-Public Use and a request to rezone the property from Agricultural and Open Space to Public Use District. The property is described as follows: That part of the North 1/2 of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 80 west of the 6th Principal Meridian, Eagle County, Colorado, lying north of Interstate Highway No. 70 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of said Section 8; thence along the northerly line of said Section 8, S89 46'27"W a distance of 1500.00 ft; thence departing the northerly line of said Section 8, S00 23'03"W a distance of 529.86 ft to a point on the northerly ROW line of I-70; thence along the northerly ROW line of I-70 following two courses: 1) S75 28'18"E a distance of 180.82 ft to a point of curvature; 2) 1327.90 ft along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 5580.00 ft, a central angle of 13 38'04" and a chord which bears N89 36'34"E 1324.70 ft distance to a point on the easterly line of said Section 8; Thence departing said ROW line of I-70 N00 23'03"E along the easterly line of said Section 8, a distance of 572.10 ft to the point of beginning, containing 20.480 acres more or less. r The above description is based on the Town of Vail annexation plats for the property described and is not based on a field survey. The basis of bearing for the above parcel is the northerly line of Section 8 being S89 46'27"W as shown on said annexation plats. Applicant: Town of Vail 5. 8. Appeal of staff decision regarding Lund Residence walkway, Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/443 Beaver Dam Road. Appellant: Jay Peterson 9. Appeal of a staff decision concerning a home occupation permit, 4594 East Meadow Drive/ Sunwood Condominiums Appellant: Ned Richard Harley, M.D. 10. Appeal of a staff decision regarding the allocation of GRFA for the Vail Village Inn, SDD #6. Appellant: Alejandro Rojas 11. A request to amend Sections 18.04.360 and 18.04.365 of the Municipal Code relating to the definitions of site coverage and slope. Applicant: Town of Vail 12. A request to amend Section 18.04.130 of the Municipal Code - definition of Floor area, gross residential (GRFA), pertaining to buildings containing more than two allowable dwelling or accommodation units. Applicant: Town of Vail 13. A request to amend the following sections of the Municipal Code related to site coverage: Section 18.04.360 - definition of site coverage; 18.14.110 - Residential Cluster District; 18.16.110 - Low Density Residential District; 18.18.110 - Medium Density Residential; 18.20.110 - High Density Residential District; 18.22.110 - Public Accommodation District; 18.24.150 - Commercial Core I District; 18.26.120 - , Commercial Core II District; 18.27.090 - Commercial Core III District; 18.28.120 - Commercial Service Center District; 18.29.090 - Arterial Business District; 18.30.110 - Heavy Service District; 18.32.110 - Agricultural and Open Space District; and 18.39.190 Ski Base/Recreation District. Applicant: Town of Vail 14. A request to amend the following sections of. the Municipal Code related to density control: Sections 18.14.090 - Residential Cluster District; 18.16.090 - Low Density Multiple-Family District; and 18.18.090 - Medium Density Multiple-Family District. Applicant: Town of Vail 15. Approval of minutes from April 22, 1991 meeting. 16. Reminder of joint PEC and Town Council air quality worksession on May 14, 1991. MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 14, 1991 SUBJECT: Fireplace Issue Discussion :.,<:< I. BACKGROUND On April 23, 1991, the Community Development Department staff presented its research on the EPA Phase II certified solid fuel units and natural gas fireplaces to a joint Planning and Environmental Commission/Town Council worksession. The research was disseminated for information purposes. Council was asked to seek public input on the questions or topics proposed for discussion, prior to the next worksession on the topic scheduled for May 7, 1991. The staff asked Council to consider each of the issues presented in the memo and be prepared to make recommendations to the staff at the May 7th meeting. ll. DISCUSSION During the discussion on April 23rd, with regard to the emissions which could be created from the EPA Phase II certified units, the question was raised as to what the "worst case scenario" would be if the units were operated without a combustor, doors open and with wet wood. In an effort to answer this question, I spoke with Steven Crane of .the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality -Air Quality Division and with Skip Barnett, Senior Scientist at OMNI, one of the principal stove testing and research facilities in Beaverton, Oregon. They both concurred that if a catalytically equipped stove is operated without the combustor, with the door open and with wet wood, they will operate as a traditional stove and produce, on average, 15-25 grams of particulates per hour, but could produce as much as 40-50 grams per hour. The non-catalytic stove operated with the door open would also operate as a traditional stove with emission levels of 15-25 grams per hour. Mr. Barnett also related that many of the catalytically equipped stoves are experiencing difficulty in achieving EPA certification levels in home use, although they do very well in the laboratory. EPA is currently performing stress tests on these units in the laboratory in an effort to detect difficulties before the unit is given EPA certification. Mr. Barnett did indicate that the non-catalytic stoves seem better able to achieve certification levels in home use. When asked about setting a particulate emissions level below 7.5 grams per hour for acceptability of units for our area, Mr. Barnett suggested a level of 5.0 grams/hour. He indicated that this would permit the installation of many of the better performing non-catalytic stoves as well as the catalytic units, if desired. 1 The staff raised the following six topics for discussion in the memo presented on April 23, 1991, and would like to direct discussion to these at this time. 1. Which of the listed devices/alternatives are acceptable for those individuals or associations considering retrofitting existing fireplaces? Should any differentiation be made based upon zoning or unit density? Each of the listed options, gas logs, gas fireplace inserts, pellet burners, catalytic woodstoves or inserts and the non-catalytic woodstoves or inserts, produce significantly less particulate pollution than a traditional fireplace if operated properly. The staff position on this issue would be to allow only gas or pellet stoves in lodge rooms and multi-family projects where fireplaces presently exist. Under the same scenario, the low density projects in the Town would be permitted the choice of any of the options determined to be acceptable. This idea is based not solely on density and frequency of use, but also on the operator knowledge required to correctly operate the other options. Those units with a higher degree of potential operator error would not be acceptable in those units which have a greater potential to not be owner occupied. 2. Should the Town of Vail work within the parameters of EPA guidelines for acceptability of units or should we establish our own standards? That is to say, should all EPA Phase II certified units be acceptable for installation, or do we wish to say only those units with emission levels of 4.0 grams or lower are acceptable and then provide a list of accepted units? There was some discussion at one point of the Town of Vail establishing its own emissions levels for determining which units are acceptable for installation within the Town of Vail. The EPA has set limits of 4.1 grams per hour for catalytic units and 7.5 grams per hour for non- catalytic units. It is deemed that whichever units meet these emissions criteria are acceptable for sale and installation. Should the Town of Vail set an emissions level of X grams of particulates per hour and determine that only those units with emissions data meeting this standard be permitted within the Town? The only concern staff would voice on this issue would be that many of the units which would meet this type of criteria would probably be catalytically equipped units. Since the catalytic convertors require maintenance to maintain the determined levels of emissions, there is some concern that if the convertors were not maintained, emissions levels exceeding 7.5 grams might be achieved. If a limit below 7.5 is set, will the slight change in particulates be a significant change when a decrease from 47 grams to at least 7.5 grams has already been accomplished? If a particulate level of 5.0 grams/hour or lower were to be established for emissions level acceptability for any unit, a review of the list of EPA Phase II certified non-catalytic units shows approximately 34 of 81 certified units, or only 42%, of these units would be acceptable. 3. Does the Council wish to take a position on acceptable options based on any specific - parameters other than particulate emissions, such as heating efficiency? Does the Council wish to approve as acceptable options only those units which meet a certain level of criteria for factors other than particulates? Staff believes that heating efficiency, the use of renewable resources and operator error should also be considered when determining acceptable unit types. 2 ` 4. In light of this information, does Council wish to have any changes made to Ordinance 42, Series of 1990, passed on February 5, 1991 ? 5. Setting a goal for percentage of conversions to be competed by the end of 1994? Staff would suggest a goal of 50% conversion of existing woodburning fireplaces and stoves under a voluntary program by June, 1994. In order to get a rough idea of the number of fireplaces which could be converted under a 50% voluntary conversion program, a review of the Development Statistics and the 1984 Woodburning Survey is helpful.. The Development Statistics, updated in 1990, show a total of 6,498 existing dwelling units in single family, primary/secondary, duplex and multi-family developments. In addition to the dwelling units, there are 828 existing accommodation units, most of which, we assume, do not have fireplaces. Information contained in the 1984 Woodburning Survey showed that 90.4% of dwelling units have some type of woodburning device. 90.4% of the 6,498 existing units would be roughly 5,814 woodburning devices. If a goal of 50% conversion of existing units is set, this would mean a conversion of 2,937 devices. Staff feels it is necessary to do a complete inventory to establish accurate numbers, but this provides a rough estimate. 3 3. An impartial, interested and professional jury is selected. The jury is composed primarily of arts professionals who have a perspective on contemporary art of national and international scope as well as one member who has specific experience in the commissioning of public art and the community involvement process. AIPP Board selects final jury. 4. Jury visits the site and learns about the community and project. 5. Jury reviews the artists' works and resumes and selects finalists. Phase II 6. Semi-finalists are invited to create proposals. They will be paid for their time and will involve the community in a series of public meetings where the community is asked for its vision of the project. People and organizations who will be directly affected by the project or who can contribute relevant historical, cultural and sociological insights are invited to participate. 7. The jury is reconvened. Artists will present their final proposals. Size, materials, colors, finish of work, method of fabrication will be indicated. A detailed budget is submitted. The jury examines the final artist proposals, asks technical, budgetary and programmatic questions. After choosing the artist, the Vail AIPP will review the selected proposal. (See Section I for detail of requirements.) 8. Vail AIPP confirms the juries choice of works to be commissioned, contracts with the artist and oversees project completion. As the artist meets predetermined benchmarks, payment is made. 9. Town Council meeting to approve the project proposal and artist. When a final artist is selected, he or she or the team will be required to be in attendance at: 10. One Community meeting to inform the public about the project. 11. Any meetings with the architect/project manager or on site meetings to execute the project. 12. Dedication of artwork. F. SELECTION CRITERIA The AIPP Board and selection jury shall use the following criteria when reviewing an artwork. The AIPP Board may include additional criteria for the project. Final proposals should specifically address each of these criteria. 3 1. Quality and Innovation , The consideration of highest priority is the inherent artistic excellence and innovation of the artwork. 2. Timelessness Each artwork should be viewed as a long term acquisition that should have relevance aesthetically to the community in future years. Due to the high visibility of public art by residents and guests who frequent public places, artworks should be selected that reflect enduring artistic quality. 3. Compatibility With Site Works of art should be compatible in style, scale, material, form, and content with their surrounding, and should form an overall relationship with the site. 4. Permanence Works of art shall have structural and surface soundness, and be resistant to theft, vandalism, and weathering. Artwork shall not require excessive maintenance or repair costs. Artworks that require expensive and/or continual maintenance are discouraged. 5. Public Safety Artwork shall not create inordinate safety problems or liability problems for the general public or Town of Vail. 6. Community Involvement The artist should devise a process of community participation which fosters a feeling of investment in and ownership of the artwork. The community's interests should be reflected in the work. The artist, in consort with the Vail community, should take the opportunity to create a unique piece of artwork that will be reflective of the community's unique nature. G. JURY The jury shall be made up of the following: 1. One professional artist. 2. Two visual arts professionals. 3. One community lay person interested in the project. 4. One AIPP Board member. 4 r H. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public art often significantly alters public places by becoming a major new presence in the environment. Informed debate among community members will be fostered through the AIPP project. I. APPLICATION MATERIALS Phase I: The artist or artist/design team will submit: 1. A one page typed statement outlining the artist's qualifications, previous work related to this project, capabilities and training of the artist or artist/design team. 2. A maximum of four color slides of relevant work. 3. Slides will be returned to the artist if the artist includes a self addressed stamped envelope with their submittal. Phase II: Detailed maquettes for the project will be submitted by the selected artists that include the following: 1. The artists will prepare a detailed proposal which will include cost estimates, insurance cost, maintenance program and a detailed drawing plan of their proposal at a scale of 1" = 10'. 2. The project concept description in the written statement should address: -Public safety. -Interior and exterior vehicular and pedestrian traffic. -Relationship of users with proposed artwork. -Impacts on the operational functions of the Town, snow plowing and maintenance. -How the proposal relates to the selection criteria listed in Section F of this request for proposal. 3. A concept sketch appropriate for presentation of the proposal on a sheet of paper no larger than 2 feet by 3 feet. J. BUDGET The total estimated budget for the project is projected at $60,000 pending final funding. Funding will partially be provided by a possible grant from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The budget includes construction costs, artist fees and administration costs as follows*: 5 . Phase II Artist Fees (Maximum) 6,000 Project Administration 3,000 Artist Fee, Materials, Construction Costs, and Artist Supervision: 51,000 Total 60,000' `All fees will include all expenses including in-kind type gifts. The artist or artist team will be paid according to the contracted amount upon completion of project. The designer shall include his/her fee, cost of materials and supplies in their submitted bid and any other expenses including travel. K. DEDICATION/PUBLICITY The AIPP Coordinator will be responsible for the publication and dedication of the project. The artist or artist/designer team will be included in all dedication activities. L. SIGNAGE signage for the artwork will be provided for by the Town with a one square foot dedication plaque. Other options for signage may be substituted for the plaque. If the artist desires, he or she may propose a signage design. M. CONTACT PERSON Shelly Mello, Project Manager Community Development Department Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 303-479-2138 N. NOTIFICATION Phase I -Candidates will be notified by mail. Phase II -Final candidate will be notified within 5 days of final selection. O. JURY ADVISORS Shelly Mello, Public Art Coordinator Town of Vail Kristan Pritz, Director of Community Development Mike Rose, Parking Superintendent 6 MEMORANDUM T0: Town Council FROM: Arts In Public Places Board (AIPP) DATE: May 10, 1991 RE: Funding Mechanisms for AIPP Program r.:........ i::$`•••: xy,;t....... ~a r/ /rh'f:rl.'l.`/.r:(riil:saw%/1::7/.:/{,r%v.'iv{(in{ri....Y+.. :.....:.in::::v:::::'r'r:::::.~.~::: v....! .i~.. n:.i:r.::: v~.ii:I} :iiii: i:: / r........ x:n.:::~:4:0::.:::::::: nrr...: ,v::::. nr.. rr. n:;niv: n?•:?::.~::::: r/rr.%r! FF/~ rr::::: i:.:....... r rrre: f.:.. :r:.iii:.i:.::. n..... .......n:::::::iv;•:viiiiii:.ii:'.4Yi::•i'f.C:4i:0: ~ v..........n rv:/ r:: X4:8:}}i.:::::::....:. n.. r...:•:::•:::•i:4:~ii:{4iivi:•i':r~•} r . F. r : ...............................r:::::............ :.f . .....1.:::::::::::.-....... 1::...::,:.-:::;.:~:.~:r lf. rte::::: r::':.::r:.w,.......} ...},y/ ....................f.:4::::..............:::::.............. ::......r/::...n : : ::::::::::::::w :v::.~ :::v.~ ~:::::::w::;; ~ .iiii%•iiiiiir .:....................:iiiviiii:~i:•iiiiiiii: ii y::::. rr::::::::::::::.: . ...:r:::: rr~»rrr::. ht:ATn:::~ rv. •rrvfrrrir!"' fifk~ Background: The AIPP Board has now been operating for more than two years. In 1990 alone, we were able to obtain over $90,000 worth of art pieces through gifts. We are now prepared to take the next step in developing the program, permanent funding. As we have previously discussed, there are a number of different funding mechanisms available. The following details different approaches: Permanent Public Funding Mechanism: 10 of Capital Improvements a) All projects ie. trails, roads, buildings PROS: would provide a substantial amount of money for program CON: With the current issues and the possible delaying of street improvements, etc is this realistic to ask for this year? b) 1% of construction costs for public buildings PROS: This would provide money for art to be placed . in new buildings and would not be a burden on the annual CIP budgets; would be a good compromise because it would use public money for the enhancement of public buildings CON: There are only a limited amount of buildings scheduled to be built in Vail (Performing/Visual Art Center, Municipal Building); would not provide consistent budget for program 1% of RETT This could be a very good starting point for funding. The RETT is already dedicated to the enhancement of open space which is exactly what an AIPP project would be accomplishing. The money would be dedicated specifically to providing art projects in dedicated open space areas. This has a lot of potential with the development of Donovan Park, and the potential development of the Ski Museum site as Pocket Park, and the Pocket Parks in West Vail. It would also cover projects in existing parks as well as the streamwalk which we have targeted as potential sites. This mechanism alone could accomplish a lot, but in conjunction with the to of CIP projects at some point the two could provide enough support for a great program. Building Permit Fee This would allow everyone who builds in Vail to become a benefactor. It could either be an % addition the total cost of the permit or become an individual item such as Rec fees based on a square footage valuation or it could be base on the total value of the projects . It may not be appropriate to levy this fee against all construction, but could be very effective if used on permits for all new residences and all commercial work including additions. Grants Grants are certainly a good source for funding. Many agencies are recognizing the importance of public art and creating grant categories specifically for this realm of design. The NEA, for example, has recently expanded there Design Arts Program to include local arts agencies to stimulate additional interest in, support for design efforts and encourage community design programming. They have also included a new subcategory "Project Grants for Rural and Small Communities" which supports local organizations to undertake projects that are smaller in scope than those conducted by larger communities . These grants require at least a one-to-one match and an indication that the project can be sustained in the future without endowment support. .Other grants are available and often have the same types of requirements. Grant funds are an excellent source, but a lot of work needs to be done before we apply and we need to have a match before we will be considered. t Private Funding Mechanisms 1. Special Development Districts: The Town currently uses a Special Development Districts review process. This is a perfect time to ask the developer to provide public art within his project if appropriate or to provide a given amount of money to AIPP for the provision of art elsewhere. Many communities have some kind of requirement for private developers to provide public art either through a to of the construction costs or through development agreements. This would be a great way to get the private sector to provide public art. 2. Private Benefactors: This is by far the hardest way to fund the program. There are a limited amount of benefactors available especially those that would provide money up front for site specific projects. This, on the other hand, is the easiest way to acquire general pieces for the town since there is no public funding needed provided that the pieces are acceptable. It needs to be decided what the focus of our efforts will be, to either acquire sculptures or provide site specific pieces. This approach also requires significant staff time. 3. Fundraisers: This would be a fantastic way to both raise money and increase the public awareness for the program. Again, though we are facing the situation where you've got to spend some money in order to get some back. This is where a budget funded by the Town becomes a very important factor in the success of the program. At this point we do not have any plans for events. 4. ~ of Gallery Sales: The board had initially considered asking for a percentage of the sales tax raised by private galleries. This process seems to be a bit more difficult than expected because the types of stores that sell art, but are not necessarily classified as galleries. The question is raised what is art and what define a gallery when trying to use this mechanism. Rather than taking the approach of a sales tax we have decided to pursue a project by which galleries and shop owners may use public land and facilities to display work at their own expense . and would be required to contribute a percentage of the sale of the piece to the public art program. The benefit of pursuing this type of arrangement is twofold. First, art which has been reviewed and approved by AIPP would be _ r land and facilities to display work at their own expense and would be required to contribute a percentage of the sale of the piece to the public art program. The benefit of pursuing this type of arrangement is twofold. First, art which has been reviewed and approved by AIPP would be displayed in public areas which will add to the overall experience of Vail and second it will raise money for the AIPP program. Currently, there are a number of pieces which are displayed in public areas, but they are placed on private land and the AIPP does not have any ability to review these pieces and receives no financial benefits from their sales. Recommendation: The staff recommends that initially, we prepare a program which uses 1% of the construction budget for all new public buildings which would be phased into the Town's budgeting process. As an example, if this had been in place when the Vail Transportation Center was renovated, there would have been $90,000 available for the provision of site specific art located throughout the structure. We are also recommending that Special Development Districts be requested to provide public art within their projects. This is part of the SDD zoning code revision. We believe this approach will serve as a magnet to interest private parties to sponsor projects and to generate community support for public art. Along with this effort for public buildings, staff and the Board will continue to try to interest the private sector sponsorship. Efforts are now underway with the Gallery Association to improve the temporary site selection process and a brochure highlighting the AIPP program and ways the public can participate will be completed this summer. 4 , MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Arts in Public Places DATE: May 14, 1991 SUBJECT: AIPP's Village Transportation Center Art Project :::r::.. : r---.... r....... ..:I... l '.ff.4;n; i:4}:::: i::: N... viii$i::;i:)}fi:; .:iii::::::::::::::::::::. n................... v:.... v: v: i:~.. : if : ii::w::v::.~::::::::.i'•iiiiii'4itii:ir~{4ii:4.•i;................ t........ . n. w:: n..:. n.....:..:..:..:n.....n............................r1H:///i:4iii:4:r.4:~:i: iiiiiii: X~i:4'fri:•f.:i/fif v:....f r'lfH'F.-iri:iv':>!f/:4ii:R The AIPP Board is seeking final approval of the attached proposal for the siting of an art piece at the Village Transportation Center. The area of the project has been determined to be the main stair corridor. No specific type of art piece has been specified. Three finalists will be chosen in July to develop a specific proposal. A final artist will be chosen in October. The artist, Board and the community, through a series of public meetings, will develop the final design. Currently, we are preparing for the submittal of an National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grant request. We will submit for this in October, and will receive confirmation in June, 1992, with the funds being available in July, 1992, if approved. The request will be for $30,000, which is half of the project budget. The Board proposes to raise the remaining $30,000 through cash and in-kind gifts and other available grants. We now have approximately $9,500 as a result of the 1991 budget allocation. Should the NEA grant request be denied, construction of the project will be delayed until all funds can be raised by the AIPP Board. - - ~ ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSAL for THE MAIN STAIR CORRIDOR AT NEW VAIL VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION CENTER A. PROJECT CONCEPT The Town of Vail, Colorado, Art in Public Places Board (AIPP) and Town Council wish to commission a professional artist or artist/design team to create a site specific artwork for the main pedestrian stairway of the new Vail Village Transportation Center. The Vail community recognizes that public art often significantly alters public places by becoming a major new presence in the environment. It is our intent to commission a piece of art which is reflective of the nature of the community. The AIPP is seeking a professional artist or design team who is interested in creating an artwork of highest quality. The artist will be chosen through a professional jury process. Phase II finalists will meet with the Vail community during the development of final proposals. Each finalist will be paid a retainer fee for idea development. The use of various materials is encouraged. B. SITE DESCRIPTION The Vail Village Transportation Center, renovated in 1990, is the gateway to Vail Village, the United States' largest skiing complex and year-round destination resort. The structure is the major hub of Vail and enjoys an estimated 1 million visitors per year. Those circulating through the structure include automobile users, public transportation users and pedestrians. Local citizens, day visitors and destination visitors use the transportation structure. The Vail Information Center and U.S. Ski Heritage Center are also located in the structure. The open air stairway begins at the top deck of the parking structure and extends down to Slifer Plaza and fountain. Beautiful views from the stairway focus on significant landmarks in the community, such as the Covered Bridge, Clock Tower and ski mountain. A series of plazas have been built at different levels of the stair. Accessways to the levels of parking also connect into the main stair corridor. The community would like to incorporate artwork into the structure's main pedestrian way so that the experience of entering Vail Village becomes more memorable and welcoming. It is our intent to reflect the community's value placed on cultural excellence in this high visibility location. The artist will be responsible for documenting safety levels and maintenance standards of all materials. Each artist or team shall address such practical concerns as pedestrian safety, snow removal, and maintenance implications of the design for the final phase. 5~ C. TYPE OF COMPETITION Open Competition: The artist selection process is open to all interested artists who will be notified by advertisement and in some cases by invitation. Special attention will be given to those artists with demonstrated experience in community involvement and experience in facilitating a community vision during development of public art projects. More specific selection criteria follow in Section F of the proposal. No fees will be paid to artists for their initial submissions. A maximum of three finalists will be selected to submit detailed maquettes for the project. Each of the three finalists shall be paid for their Phase II submittal. D. ELIGIBILITY All professional artists are eligible to submit a proposal either individually or as a team with other artists or designers. Any design team shall include at least one professional artist. E. PROJECT PROCESS Budget: $60.000.00 Schedule: Call to Artists released: Mav. 1991 Phase I Deadline: July 1. 1991 Selection of Phase II Finalists: Julv 21, 1991 Selection of Final Artist or team: October 1. 1991 Presentation to AIPP and Town Council for Final Proiect Approval: June, 1992 Construction of Proiect Julv. 1992 Completion of Proiect: Auaust. 1992 Dedication of piece: Sept.. 1992 (This schedule is subject to change} Phase I 1. A call to artists is issued through advertisement and invitation. Information about the project is released to the media. Detailed proposal packets are mailed to interested artists. A public meeting will be held with the community to determine their desires and needs. 2. Resumes and slide examples of works are collected from interested artists. (See Section I for detailed submittal requirements.) 2 3. An impartial, interested and professional jury is selected. The jury is composed primarily of arts professionals who have a perspective on contemporary art of national and international scope as well as one member who has specific experience in the commissioning of public art and the community involvement process. AIPP Board selects final jury. 4. Jury visits the site and learns about the community and project. 5. Jury reviews the artists' works and resumes and selects finalists. Phase II 6. Semi-finalists are invited to create proposals. They will be paid for their time and will involve the community in a series of public meetings where the community is asked for its vision of the project. People and organizations who will be directly affected by the project or who can contribute relevant historical, cultural and sociological insights are invited to participate. 7. The jury is reconvened. Artists will present their final proposals. Size, materials, colors, finish of work, method of fabrication will be indicated. A detailed budget is submitted. The jury examines the final artist proposals, asks technical, budgetary and programmatic questions. After choosing the artist, the Vail AIPP will review the selected proposal. (See Section I for detail of requirements.) 8. Vail AIPP confirms the juries choice of works to be commissioned, contracts with the artist and oversees project completion. As the artist meets predetermined benchmarks, payment is made. 9. Town Council meeting to approve the project proposal and artist. When a final artist is selected, he or she or the team will be required to be in attendance at: 10. One Community meeting to inform the public about the project. 11. Any meetings with the architect/project manager or on site meetings to execute the project. 12. Dedication of artwork. F. SELECTION CRITERIA The AIPP Board and selection jury shall use the following criteria when reviewing an artwork. The AIPP Board may include additional criteria for the project. Final proposals should specifically address each of these criteria. 3 1. Quality and Innovation The consideration of highest priority is the inherent artistic excellence and innovation of the artwork. 2. Timelessness Each artwork should be viewed as a long term acquisition that should have relevance aesthetically to the community in future years. Due to the high visibility of public art by residents and guests who frequent public places, artworks should be selected that reflect enduring artistic quality. 3. Compatibility With Site Works of art should be compatible in style, scale, material, form, and content with their surrounding, and should form an overall relationship with the site. 4. Permanence Works of art shall have structural and surface soundness, and be resistant to theft, vandalism, and weathering. Artwork shall not require excessive maintenance or repair costs. Artworks that require expensive and/or continual maintenance are discouraged. 5. Public Safetv Artwork shall not create inordinate safety problems or liability problems for the general public or Town of Vail. 6. Community Involvement The artist should devise a process of community participation which fosters a feeling of investment in and ownership of the artwork. The community's interests should be reflected in the work. The artist, in consort with the Vail community, should take the opportunity to create a unique piece of artwork that will be reflective of the community's unique nature. G. JURY The jury shall be made up of the following: 1. One professional artist. 2. Two visual arts professionals. 3. One community lay person interested in the project. 4. One AIPP Board member. 4 r . H. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public art often significantly alters public places by becoming a major new presence in the environment. Informed debate among community members will be fostered through the AIPP project. I. APPLICATION MATERIALS Phase I: The artist or artist/design team will submit: 1. A one page typed statement outlining the artist's qualifications, previous work related to this project, capabilities and training of the artist or artisUdesign team. 2. A maximum of four color slides of relevant work. 3. Slides will be returned to the artist if the artist includes a self addressed stamped envelope with their submittal. Phase II: Detailed maquettes for the project will be submitted by the selected artists that include the following: 1. The artists will prepare a detailed proposal which will include cost estimates, insurance cost, maintenance program and a detailed drawing plan of their proposal at a scale of 1" = 10'. 2. The project concept description in the written statement should address: -Public safety. -Interior and exterior vehicular and pedestrian traffic. -Relationship of users with proposed artwork. -Impacts on the operational functions of the Town, snow plowing and maintenance. -How the proposal relates to the selection criteria listed in Section F of this request for proposal. 3. A concept sketch appropriate for presentation of the proposal on a sheet of paper no larger than 2 feet by 3 feet. J. BUDGET The total estimated budget for the project is projected at $60,000 pending final funding. Funding will partially be provided by a possible grant from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The budget includes construction costs, artist fees and administration costs as follows': 5 Phase II Artist Fees (Maximum) 6,000 Project Administration 3,000 Artist Fee, Materials, Construction Costs, and Artist Supervision: 51,000 Total 60,000* *All fees will include all expenses including in-kind type gifts. The artist or artist team will be paid according to the contracted amount upon completion of project. The designer shall include his/her fee, cost of materials and supplies in their submitted bid and any other expenses including travel. K. DEDICATION/PUBLICITY The AIPP Coordinator will be responsible for the publication and dedication of the project. The artist or artist/designer team will be included in all dedication activities. L. SIGNAGE signage for the artwork will be provided for by the Town with a one square foot dedication plaque. Other options for signage may be substituted for the plaque. If the artist desires, he or she may propose a signage design. M. CONTACT PERSON Shelly Mello, Project Manager Community Development Department Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 303-479-2138 N. NOTIFICATION Phase I -Candidates will be notified by mail. Phase II -Final candidate will be notified within 5 days of final selection. O. JURY ADVISORS Shelly Mello, Public Art Coordinator Town of Vail Kristan Pritz, Director of Community Development Mike Rose, Parking Superintendent 6 MEMORANDUM T0: Town Council FROM: Arts In Public Places Board (AIPP) DATE: May 10, 1991 Funding Mechanisms for AIPP Program r..,.•:::::: lir{~-:ra .NV xr .l .:ir%:/ nx .ilN/.~ f' . ~9.Y' 'fiiiii:il~ iijii{Ji: iiiii}:!^::;:jii ~ r, w ~:::::4i:4ii:ivi}:•iiiiii:'.4ii:v4iii:;{:?:.t:}v:F.ryiiii%i•iiiii:.•:...........:............... .l %i1: i6. ~xr::::: rn.}: r. xi.._:::.. :n?:v,.~ r::::: r:::::v::::, .n~ / ~ nom:; 1. ir;i::i::::.......... r.v :v; w.... F.........•:: nr::::. ivi: iii:::•~:i:::: ;:::;Gill`+~i:4i iii)jj j;Y:iii}ikiii::?iiii::'.:!t+v;t::::::.w::::::.~::::::::}iii~:::::::::::.~:::: iiii?^: iiiY++++: x:; x; r•••r / . r . •r... . In+ri:{n .................::::.....rr...r~~~~-r l~ f/ ~.......':.i:.~ry~~•.rt .i.... . .•i.trl :.......................::::::i..: ~r~ n~::•i Yr::; .:v:::::::::.......•.r •,r r.r ....:r :..%J/.L/l///lJf/.i::~': f{.::%f.G'.`.~ f.~ • F:..:;•:.::;::' ;iii.::;•::.i..•:::S" A:• ..r/.c:,:.. . Background: The AIPP Board has now been operating for more than two years. In 1990 alone, we were able to obtain over $90,000 worth of art pieces through gifts. We are now prepared to take the next step in developing the program, permanent funding. As we have previously discussed, there are a number of different funding mechanisms available. The following details different approaches: Permanent Public Fundinc7 Mechanism: 10 of Capital Improvements a) All projects ie. trails, roads, buildings PROS: Would provide a substantial amount of money for program CON: With the current issues and the possible delaying of street improvements, etc is this realistic to ask for this year? b) to of construction costs for public buildings PROS: This would provide money for art to be placed in new buildings and would not be a burden on the annual CIP budgets; Would be a good compromise because it would use public money for the enhancement of public buildings CON: There are only a limited amount of buildings . scheduled to be built in Vail (Performing/Visual Art Center, Municipal Building); Would not provide consistent budget for program 10 of RETT This could be a very good starting point for funding. The RETT is already dedicated to the enhancement of open space which is exactly what an AIPP project would be accomplishing. The money would be dedicated specifically to providing art projects in dedicated open space areas. This has a lot of potential with the development of Donovan Park, and the potential development of the Ski Museum site as Pocket Park, and the Pocket Parks in West Vail. It would also cover projects in existing parks as well as the streamwalk which we have targeted as potential sites. This mechanism alone could accomplish a lot, but in conjunction with the to of CIP projects at some point the two could provide enough support for a great program. Building Permit Fee This would allow everyone who builds in Vail to become a benefactor. It could either be an o addition the total cost of the permit or become an individual item such as Rec fees based on a square footage valuation or it could be base on the total value of the projects . It may not be appropriate to levy this fee against all construction, but could be very effective if used on permits for all new residences and all commercial work including additions. Grants Grants are certainly a good source for funding. Many agencies are recognizing the importance of public art and creating grant categories specifically for this realm of design. The NEA, for example, has recently expanded there Design Arts Program to include local arts agencies to stimulate additional interest in, support for design efforts and encourage community design programming. They have also included a new subcategory "Project Grants for Rural and Small Communities" which supports local organizations to undertake projects that are smaller in scope than those conducted by larger communities. These grants require at least a one-to-one match and an indication that the project can be sustained in the future without endowment support. Other grants are available and often have the same types of requirements. Grant funds are an excellent source, but a lot of work needs to be done before we apply and we need to have a match before we will be considered. Private Funding Mechanisms 1. Special Development Districts: The Town currently uses a Special Development Districts review process. This is a perfect time to ask the developer to provide public art within his project if appropriate or to provide a given amount of money to AIPP for the provision of art elsewhere. Many communities have some kind of requirement for private developers to provide public art either through a 1% of the construction costs or through development agreements. This would be a great way to get the private sector to provide public art. 2. Private Benefactors: This is by far the hardest way to fund the program. There are a limited amount of benefactors available especially those that would provide money up front for site specific projects. This, on the other hand, is the easiest way to acquire general pieces for the town since there is no public funding needed provided that the pieces are acceptable . It needs to be decided what the focus of our efforts will be, to either acquire sculptures or provide site specific pieces. This approach also requires significant staff time. 3. Fundraisers: This would be a fantastic way to both raise money and increase the public awareness for the program. Again, though we are facing the situation where you've got to spend some money in order to get some back. This is where a budget funded by the Town becomes a very important factor in the success of the program. At this point we do not have any plans for events. 4. $ of Gallery Sales: The board had initially considered asking for a percentage of the sales tax raised by private galleries. This process seems to be a bit more difficult than expected because the types of stores that sell art, but are not necessarily classified as galleries. The question is raised what is art and what define a gallery when trying to use this mechanism. Rather than taking the approach of a sales tax we have decided to pursue a project by which galleries and shop owners may use public land and facilities to display work at their own expense and would be required to contribute a percentage of the sale of the piece to the public art program. The benefit of pursuing this type of arrangement is twofold. First, art which has been reviewed and approved by AIPP would be land and facilities to display work at their own expense and would be required to contribute a percentage of the sale of the piece to the public art program. The benefit of pursuing this type of arrangement is twofold. First, art which has been reviewed and approved by AIPP would be displayed in public areas which will add to the overall experience of Vail and second it will raise money for the AIPP program. Currently, there are a number of pieces which are displayed in public areas, but they are placed on private land and the AIPP does not have any ability to review these pieces and receives no financial benefits from their sales. Recommendation: The staff recommends that initially, we prepare a program which uses 1% of the construction budget for all new public buildings which would be phased into the Town's budgeting process. As an example, if this had been in place when the Vail Transportation Center was renovated, there would have been $90,000 available for the provision of site specific art located throughout the structure. We are also recommending that Special Development Districts be requested to provide public art within their projects. This is part of the SDD zoning code revision. We believe this approach will serve as a magnet to interest private parties to sponsor projects and to generate community support for public art. Along with this effort for public buildings, staff and the Board will continue to try to interest the private sector sponsorship. Efforts are now underway with the Gallery Association to improve the temporary site selection process and a brochure highlighting the AIPP program and ways the public can participate will be completed this summer. 4 B8tt Revised: 5/10/1891 lONN OB VAIL BBAL BStAiB tBANSBBA !AI Bietory and Budget 1981 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1991 BODGBi MONiB ACiOAL ACiOAL ACtOAL ACiOAL ACiOAL ecioeL ACiOAL ACiOAL ACiOAL ACiOAL ACiOAL BODGBi AcioeL YABIANCB January 63,999 98,089 106,981 119,912 78,053 80,733 101,3?4 131,916 96,119 309,233 162,954 ; 104,139 165,141 61,002 Bebrnaty 40,595 69,018 105,024 132,220 86,289 170,052 64,906 44,040 109,873 140,192 133,085 ; 94,373 71,413 ( 22,960) 8arcb 69,886 126,935 109,533 13T,820 62,693 63,831 92,551 38,791 68,104 145,957 77,995 ; 86,341 183,698 97,357 April ?6,855 94,653 65,900 103,526 173,321 90,396 182,743 95,554 179,671 151,069 152,027 ; 119,168 108,040 ( 11,128) Snbtotal 251,335 388,695 387,438 493,538 400,356 405,012 441,580 310,301 453,767 746,451 526,061 ; 404,022 528,292 124,270 8ay 42,738 84,324 54,663 90,599 96,006 228,673 98,651 120,984 99,736 220,299 167,972 ; 110,225 June 62,239 125,433 54,488 140,638 76,467 49,513 79,915 73,509 101,364 122,466 136,364 ; 88,783 July 49,367 186,110 104,262 68,539 157,598 88,528 70,441 47,949 126,537 125,675 75,169 ; 92,397 Angnst 18,859 115,499 71,282 97,806 58,931 32,860 100,182 61,137 109,315 86,347 77,486 ; 79,193 Septe~ber 59,800 113,992 49,332 96,746 64,611 48,516 108,167 78,819 116,557 143,306 75,745 ; 81,485 October 108,510 154,000 42,498 122,546 88,132 109,633 93,860 124,291 177,360 241,393 118,986 ; 117,125 Nove~ber 102,623 101,768 81,698 91,385 105,109 74,909 89,047 114,839 241,888 165,964 102,210 ; 102,481 Dece~ber 142,662 133,867 110,911 56,533 81,890 333,139 106,695 95,495 192,947 192,737 107,880 ; 124,290 i0lAL 888,133 1,409,688 956,572 1,258,330 1,129,766 1,370,783 1,188,538 1,027,324 1,619,471 2,044,638 1,387,873 ; 1,200,000 528,292 124,270 ~ . AGENDA Present Absent LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY Simonett Bishop REGULAR MEETING Cassidy MAY 8, 1991 Thomas 10:00 A.M. Wilson 1. Consideration of the Authority of a modification of premises for Manor Vail Condominium Association, Inc., dba, Manor Vail Condominium Association APPROVED: 4-0 2. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of an application for a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/ Spirituous Beverages, by the Colorado Society for Respiratory Care on Wednesday, June 12, 1991, and Monday, July 15, 1991, from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. each day, at the location of Ford Park, Lower Bench, 530 South Frontage Road East, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: President - Ellie Dawkins-McShane Events Manager - Dennis Vernon APPROVED: 4-0 3. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of an application for a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/ Spirituous Beverages, by the Vail Resort Association on Sunday, May 26, 1991, Thursday, July 4, 1991, Saturday, September 14, 1991, and Sunday, September 15, 1991, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, at the location of Lionshead Mall, Tract C, to the west of the Lifthouse Lodge, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: President - Sylvia Blount Events Manager - Deberah Ramsey APPROVED: 4-0 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of an application for a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/ Spirituous Beverages, by the Town of Vail on Saturday, June 8, 1991, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. at the location of Ford Park, Lower Bench, 530 South Frontage Road East, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: Town Manager - Rondall V. Phillips Events Manager - Bob Mach APPROVED: 4-0 5. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a 100% transfer of ownership of the Retail Liquor Store License held by Ulawatu, Inc., dba, Lazy Liquors, Ltd., to James Philip Nosaf, dba, East Vail Spirits, at the location of 3971 Bighorn Road, Vail, Colorado. James Philip Nosaf - Individual Applicant/Owner APPROVED: 4-0 r; 6. Discussion by the Authority of a liquor license renewal request from Gary Haubert, Steve Buis, etal, dba, Lionshead Bar and Grill. RENEWAL APPROVED: 4-0 WITH CONDITION: Transfer of ownership must be filed with the Town of Vail within 60 days of 5/8/91. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Suspension or Revocation of the Hotel and Restaurant liquor license held by Gary Haubert, Steve Buis, etal, dba, Lionshead Bar and Grill. The grounds for suspension or revocation are as follows: a. On March 28, 1991, the licensee, Gary Haubert, Steve Buis, etal, dba, Lionshead Bar and Grill, sold malt, vinous, or spirituous beverages to Mary Margaret Fay, a person under the age of twenty-one years, in violation of C.R.S. 12-47-128 (1) (a), as amended. AUTHORITY'S FINDINGS AND STIPULATIONS: 1. STIPULATION AGREEMENT WITH LICENSEE THAT A VIOLATION DID OCCUR 2. LICENSE SUSPENDED FOR 3 DAYS - TO BE HELD IN ABEYANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: A) NO LIQUOR CODE VIOLATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS 8. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Suspension or Revocation of the Hotel. and Restaurant liquor license held by Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc. The grounds for suspension or revocation are as follows: a. On March 24, 1991, the licensee, Gasthof Gramshammer, Inc., sold malt, vinous, or spirituous beverages to Michele Christine Donaghy, a person under the age of twenty-one years, in violation of C.R.S. 12-47-128 (1) (a), as amended. AUTHORITY'S FINDINGS AND STIPULATIONS: 1. GUILTY - SERVICE TO A MINOR 2. LICENSE SUSPENDED FOR 3 DAYS - TO BE HELD IN ABEYANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: A) NO LIQUOR CODE VIOLATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS 9. Notification to the Authority of recent renewals: a. Off the Wall Investments, Inc., dba, Clancy's b. Village Inn Plaza Liquors, Inc. c. Hotel Food Company, Inc., dba, The Westin Hotel, Vail d. Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., dba, Bully III APPROVED: 4-0 ~ ~ ` 10. Any other matters the Authority wishes to discuss. a. General discussion with Rich Salturelli of Blano's on proposed modification of premise - adding deck area to license. b. Motion to call a Suspension/Revocation Hearing (Conduct of Establishment) for Bad Attitude Development Company, dba, Bad Attitude Cafe APPROVED: 4-0 FOR 6/12/91 MEETING TOWN OF VAIL VAail,DLocal Licensing Authority 11/1,0 ~fi1MFti--~ Martha S. Jensen Assistant Secretary to the Authority Page WORK SESSION FOLLUW'UP TINS SOLU FOLLUW'UP interest indicated ea them up. Br°f°s has f s annexation ear for S bu ha5 UESTION Mary etity°ns dig °f end of next 9 requyreme asor's La p Y o~ u ° cl° SCh dine f°r 5r14' iOPIE ding w/leg all for a leCtinq could urP°Ses• for oCee 1 Col tax P Sion' dinan~es . RRXatia r ueethe ~°V ys n°t ~°rk ses ing apprepd 5°us 6 1~'g1 a~• e IN~E~pUNTA ~aPynl n s r pr petty taxes des. apple at at Staff Meeting i$/gAT~ONrequest tom oles, rol~edes~arian" Discuss oCCUr~i2 falgngineer ~NNEK Should byc om highly onshead~ unding ma yng °f g EN/LARR~•xohibited•fsage .and es' Undergr° g2 or spy underway' Cement. AND tc., be a in the ~,nq struotur eCtric ,g1 d and design e about a about LER BLADES yZed a ing the park olY Cr°ss d1 triot~sl hire ted Jim Fr ty would no tax such BIKES/R° ~ARD5 includ ork with K r°vement t Vail• Ron coma tax lyabyorney say a property ~/1~ES/S~'~EB Y/GREO~ sPeCyal't es yn Eas to The Town County at 5ible for S~ TIES IN oR estably r and utyly ould lyke and $5'S~~ ent ys P°S Ling to OUNDING U~ILI for underg owners Astor bank taxes aaa this' .11 resP°n wrl~te y a a a i d ~/2~ VAIL GR LARRY ase c mm°n area Vail Vent rtes Shell why h was ynclu mapping EAST gIL G 4 P en h ties• our lette request: LIONS RIDGE IN p al follow"up packet' testing an Lease o Your 4/ Soil 13-9I• i°d. 9/2 esP°nd• has begun•to DEC 5 time Per KRIS~AN• R 'th VA ~ omelet yawn B p for ~ Year t the 5"2I"91 CE COND°• ASSN• to uisiti°n wy beyng d r be gyven a 18 MILL rk °ut sy acq Final aw meeting• ° ing LE`~`PER RON/~R~a~ design' award this even OW DUMD Come et's be prepared to 1/11/gl SN RON/g,OB~ L spryng' SON `~OU`PB set CHUCK AND equest: Ro R COGNITION ~ WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TOPIC _QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 4/9 CITY OF BOULDER COURT LARRY: Obtain district court ruling to This was actually decided by a jury trial CA5E Re: SANDING (request:Rose) scertain local implications. and was not a district court decision. Larry will get as much detail as possible. 4/9 PUBLIC UTILITIES ACQUISITION STEVE BARWICK: Reassess municipal Will do. involvement/ownership of public utilities. rovide budget in 1992 for feasibility study. 4/23 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST VERYONE: The next Mayor's Breakfast is Letters of invitation mailed 5-6-91. scheduled for Wednesday, May 29, 1991, at 7:30 A.M., at the Racquet Club Restaurant in ast Vail. Please plan to attend this eighborhood input session. 5/7 PARKING-IN-LIEU/CCII RISTAN/STAFF: Establish time schedule for Back to Council by mid-June. (request: Gibson) eview of fees for this commecial area. 5/7 VA/2% SALES TAX COLLECTION RRY/STEVE: Research remedies to change Research is underway. (request: Gibson/Lapin) his to a mandatory TOV tax collection. 5/7 BICYCLE PATH SNOW PLOWING ETE: Bicycle/pedestrian path behind the Done. (request: Rose) ewage treatment plant needs to be plowed nd swept. 5/7 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE STREET ETE: Lights have been out from Ski Club Will do. LIGHTS (request: Steinberg) ail for some time. 5/7 MERV LAPIN STREET LIGHT ETE: Light in front of Merv's house NEVER Will Do. oes off! 5/7 COST-OF-LIVING STUDY/NWCOG VERYONE: Results will be released and Wi11 check with Bob Mack, Steve Barwick, interpretations given at a special meeting in and Shelly Raemi~. remmling on Thursday, May 16, 1991. Cdr ho can attend?