Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-07-22 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session r~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1991 2:00 P. M. AGENDA 1. PEC Report 2. DRB Report 3. Ted Martin Request for September '91 Event Funding . Third Annual Mountain Bike Biathlon 4. Adoption of the 1991 -Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Fire Code, and 1990 National Electrical Code 5. Discussion of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1991, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.28 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to expand, strengthen, and clarify code provisions relating to air pollution control 6. Information Update 7. Other 8. Adjournment CIAGENDA.N5 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1991 2:00 p.m. EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 p.m. 1. PEC Report 2:10 p.m. 2. DRB Report 2:15 p.m. 3. Ted Martin Request for September '91 Event Funding Third Annual Mountain Bike Biathlon 2:45 p.m. 4. Adoption of the 1991 -Uniform Building Code, Uniform Gary Murrain Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Fire Code, and 1990 National Electrical Code Action Requested of Council: Review proposed changes and amendments to the 1991 codes: Staff Recommendation: Update required. 3:45 p.m. 5. Discussion of Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1991, an ordinance Susan Scanlan repealing and reenacting Chapter 8.28 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to expand, strengthen, and clarify code provisions relating to air pollution control Action Requested of Council: Review and provide input on the proposed changes to Ordinance No. 21 prior to second reading scheduled for 8/6/91. Background Rationale: The Council directed staff to make some changes to the ordinance before it could be approved on final reading. Staff was so directed at the evening meeting on 7/2/91 when the second reading of the ordinance was tabled. Staff has revised the ordinance and seeks Council input prior to a formal reading on 8/6/91. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1991 as submitted. 4:30 p.m. 6. Information Update 7. Other 8. Adjournment CMGENDA.WSE l PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION July 22, 1991 AGENDA 12:30 Site Visits 2:00 Public Hearing Site Visits Public Hearinq 4. 1. A request for wall height and site coverage variances for Lot 1, Block 1, Intermountain Subdivision/2684 Larkspur Court. Applicant: Robin E. Hernreich/Atwell Development Planner: Betsy Rosolack 2. 2. A request for a worksession to rezone property from Primary/Secondary to Low Density Multiple Family, generally located at 2239 Chamonix Lane, more particularly described as: Parcel A: A tract of land containing one acre, more or less, located in the South 1/2 of the South East 1/4 of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 11; thence westerly along the northerly line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 bearing south 86 20' W a distance of 167.80 ft. to a point: Thence southerly along a line 167.80 ft. distant from and parallel to the east line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, a distance of 200.00 ft. to a point: Thence easterly a distance of 167.80 ft. along a line 200.00 ft. distant from and parallel to the north line of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 to a point on its east line; Thence easterly on a line parallel to the north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 11, a distance of 50.95 ft. to a point: Thence northerly and parallel with the west line of the east 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 11, a distance of 200.00 ft. to the point of intersection with the extension of the north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1 /4 of said Section 11; 1 Thence westerly on a deflective angle left of 95 21'00" along the ' extension of the north line of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 11, a distance of 50.95 ft. to the NE corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 11, being the point of beginning. Parcel B: Tract A, Vail Heights Filing No. 1, according to the recorded plat thereof. Applicant: Erich and Lily Schmetzko Planner: Andy Knudtsen 3. An appeal of a staff decision concerning a density variance granted to Treetops Condominiums, Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing/452 East Lionshead Circle. Appellant: Treetops Condominium Association Planner: Mike Mollica TABLED TO AUGUST 26, 1991 5. 4. A request for a conditional use permit and a setback variance for an outdoor patio for Gondo's Restaurant, Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing/600 Lionshead Mall. Applicant: Legends of VailNail Associates Planner: Jill Kammerer 1. 5. A request for a front setback variance for the Tupy Residence, Lot 33, Buffehr Creek Resubdivision/1901 Chamonix Lane. Applicant: Leon Tupy Planner: Andy Knudtsen 3. 6. A request for a site coverage variance for the Rothbart Residence, Lot 12, Block A, Vail Das Schone First Filing/2349 Chamonix Drive. Applicant: Gary Rothbart Planner: Jill Kammerer 7. A request for a minor exterior alteration, and a site coverage variance for Super Star Studios, Gorsuch (Clock Tower) Building, Lots C, D and E, Block 5, Vail Village First Filing/263 East Gore Creek Drive. Applicant: Paul Golden Planner: Jill Kammerer TABLED TO AUGUST 12, 1991 0 8. A request for review of the Vail Streetscape Master Plan for formal recommendation to the Town Council. The Master Plan addresses the general area from East Lionshead Circle to Ford Park, and includes West Meadow Drive, East Meadow Drive, Willow Bridge Road, Gore Creek Drive, Vail Valley Drive, Bridge Street, and Hanson Ranch Road. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Mike Mollica TABLED TO AUGUST 12, 1991 9. A request for a wall height variance for the Samuels Residence, Lot 11- B, Block 7, Vaii Village First Filing/224 Forest Road. Applicant: Bernard Samuels Planner: Mike Monica TABLED TO AUGUST 12,.1991 10. Approval of June 8, 1991 meeting minutes. 11. Reminder of July 25, 1991 gathering. t DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JIILY 17, 1991 3:00 P.M. REVISED 7/17/91 SITE VISITS 1:30 p.m. 1 Abraham - 874 Spruce Court 2 Oberlohr - 2656 Davos Trail 3 Bailey - 193 Beaver Dam Road 4 Rimski - 394 Beaver Dam Road 7 Lodge Tower - 200 Vail Road 8 Sonnenalp - 20 Vail Road 9 Gasthof Gramshammer - 231 Gore Creek Drive 10 Hubcap - 143 Meadow Drive 11 Super Star Studios - 263 East Gore Creek Drive 12 Schofield - 1448 Vail Valley Drive 13 Moore Residence - 4214 Columbine Way 14 Windstream Condos. - 4295 Columbine Drive 15 Fried - 5124 Grouse Lane AGENDA 1. Sonnenalp - Major Renovation to Hotel AK 20 Vail Road/Part of Lots K & L, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1st MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Sherry Dorward VOTE: 4-0 Preliminary approval given to the structure with conditions. Landscaping will be presented later for final approval. 2. Willow Bridge Replacement of existing structure MM Located on Willow Bridge Road, between the Village Center Condominiums and the Sitzmark Lodge. MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Sherry Dorward VOTE: 4-0 Approved as modified. 3. Kravis - Outdoor Lighting Plan AK 424 Forest Road/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Village 3rd MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. n T/ 4. Gasthof Gramshammer - Landscape Plan AK 231 Gore Creek Drive/Lot H & I, Block 5-B, Vail Village 1st MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 5. Breeze Ski Rentals - Sign Variance JK Montaneros Commercial Condominium Unit #100, 641 West Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 3rd Filing. MOTION: Chuck Crist SECOND: George Lamb VOTE: 3-1 Sherry Dorward cast dissenting vote for the following .reasons: 1. Signage needs in Lionshead are different from signage needs in the Village. 2. Signage can be an amenity and should not be consider a negative. Signage need not necessarily be minimized. 6. Super Star Studios - Sign BR 263 E Gore Creek Drive/Lots C, D, E, Block 5, Vail Village 1st MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 7. Fried - Request to separate garage & residence SM 5124 Grouse Lane/Lot 7, Block 1, Gore Creek Subdivision MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 3-0 Conceptual review of garage. Separation of units approved. Sherry Dorward abstained. 8. Oberlohr - Addition SM 2656 Davos Trail/Lot 3, Block 3, Vail Ridge MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. ~ 9. Hubcap - New Sign SM 143 Meadow Drive/Crossroads Mall MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 10. Abraham - Entry Addition AK 874 Spruce Court/Lot 11, Vail Village 9th MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 11. Kimball Residence - Secondary unit on a lot less AK than 15,000 sq. ft. 1915 West Gore Creek Drive/Lot 28, Vail Village West Filing #2 MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Sherry Dorward VOTE: 4-0 Approved. 12. Schofield - Garage Addition AK 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley 1st MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Sherry Dorward VOTE: 4-0 Approved. Railing on garage must comply with the Uniform Building Code. 13. Ford Amphitheater Kiosk JK 530 South Frontage Road MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Staff Approved. 14. Bailey - New Residence JK 193 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 38, Block 7, Vail Village 1st MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Conceptual review. 15. Rimski Remodel - Modification to approved site plan JK ~ to allow construction of a hot tub in the side setback. 394 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 7, Block 2, Vail Village 3rd Filing. MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 3-0-1 Consent approved. Ned Gwathmey abstained.' 16. Lodge Tower - Repaint windows, doors and balcony BR railings. 200 Vail Road/Lot A, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 17. Windstream Condos. - Replace Roof BR 4295 Columbine Drive/Windstream Condominiums MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 18. Moore Residence - Reroof BR 4214 Columbine Way/Lot 6, Bighorn Terrace MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 19. Vail Glo Lodge - Bollards BR 701 West Lionshead Circle/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Lionshead 3rd MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 20. Timber Creek - Addition of Garage SM 2883 Kinnickinnick Road/Lot 8, Block 4, Intermountain - MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. I) 21. Trope Residence - Modification to approved site plan JK to allow changes to driveway and adjacent landscaping. 1115 Hornsilver Circle/Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Village 8th MOTION: SECOND; VOTE: TABLED TO AIIGIIST 7TH MEETING. 22. TV8 - Air Conditioning System JK 675 Lionshead Place/Sunbird Lodge MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Ned Gwathmey Pat Herrington Chuck Crist (PEC) Sherry Dorward George Lamb STAFF APPROVALS: Meyer/Byrne Residence - Changes to approved plan. Lot 23, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Hutchinson Primary/Secondary Residence - Revise interior spaces of secondary unit. Revise window on north elevation. Lot 1, Vail Village 1st Gotthelf's/My Jeweller - New awning with signage on existing frame. East Gore Creek Drive/Lodge Promenade Kramer Residence - New Deck on Unit #3 933 Red Sandstone Road/Cottonwood Park Condo./Unplatted Booth Creek Roadway - Retaining walls located on Bald Mtn. Road and Katsos Ranch Road. ~ (~i , ~~r MARKETING & MANAGEMENT TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Ted Mart in-'1 /h SUBJECT: Vail Mountain Bike Biathlon DATE: July 18, 1991 At this time, without the town's help, U. S. Sports, Inc. is strongly considering tree cancellation of a shoulder season event which is in its third year and is staged completely at Lionshead. Due to the "state of the economy" special event sponsorship solicitation has been very difficult. Because of the lack of a Title Sponsor for this year's event we are requesting that a X5,000.00 contribution be made by the Town of Vail so treat this event may continue. The event has had a positive impact on Lionshead as well as other town businesse=~ over the past two years. Thank you. Corporate Offices: Post Office Box 477 Vail, Colorado 81658 303/949-5199 FAx 303/949-5050 1 ~ ~ . (i ~ ` , ~ ~ ~0~~ MARKETING & MANAGEMENT 1991 MOUNTAIN BIKE BIATHLON September 21, 1991 REVENUE TITLE SPONSOR 5,000.00 ENTRIES (250 X $35)......,~ 8,750,00 MISC. SPONSORS............$ 500.00 TOTAL .....................$14,250.00 EXPENSES RACE EXPENSES T-Shirts <300 x $6.00) . $ 1, 800.00 Timing and Results 1,200.00 Sound 350.00 Course set-up and medical.......... 2,000.00 Waterbottles 750.00 Competitor Food 500.00 Labor/Salaries 3,500.00 Announcer 150.00 Awards 250.00 Venue Enhancements 250.00 Tent Rental 75.00 TOTAL ..............................10,825.00 PERMITS AND FEES Permit Fees 100. U0 TOTAL 100.00 ADMINISTRATIVE Insurance 500.00 Printing 300.00 ' Office Supplies and Telephone...... 250.00 Miscellaneous................ 500.00 TOTAL 1,550 00 PROMOTIONAL Race #'s 350.00 Posters 350.00 Advertising 750.00 TOTAL 1,450.00 EXPENSE TOTAL ................................$13,925.00 Corporate Offices: Post Office Box 477 Vail, Colorado 81658 303/949-5199 Fax 303/949-5050 ©C~aC~~ ORDINANCE NO. 21 ' Series of 1991 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 8.28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; SETTING FORTH CERTAIN PROVISIONS TO CONTROL AIR POLLUTION WITHIN THE TOWN; AND PROVIDING DETAILS WITH REGARD THERETO WHEREAS, the setting of the Town of Vail in a valley between two mountains restricts air movement through the valley; WHEREAS, the movement of air through the Gore Valley is further restricted in cold times of the year thereby causing the increased buildup of pollutants in the air caused by solid fuel burning devices; WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the pollution caused by solid fuel burning devices is exacerbated by the altitude, topography, climate and meteorology of the Town of Vail; ' WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that these sources of air pollution may be minimized by existing, practical and economical technologies; WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that it is necessary to encourage environmentally beneficial technologies to prevent further degradation of the air quality of the Vail Valley; WHEREAS, the Town Council considers visually clean air to be an irreplaceable asset enjoyed by guests and residents of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT; Section 1 The Vail Municipal Code Chapter 8.28 "Air Pollution Control" be repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 8.28.010 Purpose and Applicability These regulations are enacted for the purpose of promoting the health, safety and general welfare of the residents and visitors in the Town of Vail. These regulations are intended to achieve the following more specific purposes: 1) To protect the air quality in the Town of Vail; 2) To reverse the continuing trend toward increased air degradation in the Town of Vail; f 3) To provide heat sources that are efficient and have a reduced polluting effect; 4) And to generally protect the air for the purpose of the public's overall health, safety and welfare. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all areas of the Town of Vail. 8.28.020 Definitions 1) Solid Fuel Burnina Device: shall mean any fireplace, stove, firebox or device intended and/or used for the purpose of burning wood, pulp, paper or other non-liquid or non-gaseous fuel. 2) Certified Solid Fuel Burnina Device: shall mean a solid fuel burning device which is certified by the Environmental Protection Agency and by the Air Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health to produce 7.5 grams of particulates per hour or less. This shall include both catalytic and non-catalytic Phase II stoves as well as pellet burners and any other technology which can be shown to meet these emission criteria. 3) Wood Burnina Fireplace: shall mean an open hearth or fire chamber or similar prepared place in which a fire may be made and which is built in conjunction with a chimney. 4) Gas Appliance: shall mean a fully self-contained, Underwriter's Laboratories (U.L.) listed and American Gas Association (A.G.A.) "fireplace" unit which does not require venting through a chimney and which does not permit the use of solid fuel. 5) Gas Loa Fireplace: shall mean a fireplace as previously defined equipped with an A.G.A. and U.L. listed artificial log unit which is approved for the burning of natural gas. • 6) Dwelling unit: means any room or group of rooms in a single family, two-family or multiple-family dwelling with kitchen facilities designed for or used by one family as an independent housekeeping unit. 7) Accommodation unit: means any room or group of rooms without kitchen facilities designed for or adapted to occupancy by guests and accessible from common corridors, walks, or balconies without passing through another accommodation unit 2 or dwelling unit. 8) Refuse: means all solid wastes, garbage and rubbish, whether combustible or noncombustible, including rubble. 9) Restricted Dwellina Unit: means: a. Any dwelling unit which is restricted by the Zoning Code to be leased or rented for a period of not less than thirty (30) consecutive days and which is required to be leased or rented to tenants who are full time employees of the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Eagle-Vail, Avon, or the surrounding areas. For the purposes of this Section, afull-time employee shall be deemed to be one who works an average of not less than thirty (30) hours per week. b. Any dwelling unit which the Zoning Code prohibits from being subdivided or sold separately from another dwelling unit. 10) Common Area: means the lobby of any lodge (as that term is defined in Section 18.04 of the Zoning Code), the area of any condominium project available for the common use of all the unit owners and restaurants and bars. 8.28.030 Woodburnina Fireplaces/Solid Fuel Burnina Devices Prohibited There shall be no woodburning fireplace and no solid fuel burning device, other than a certified solid fuel burning device, constructed or installed within any dwelling unit, accommodation unit, restricted dwelling unit or common area within the Town. 8.28.040 Permitted Devices Certified solid fuel burning devices, gas appliances, and gas log fireplaces shall be permitted to be installed or constructed in dwelling units, accommodation units, restricted dwelling units or common areas subject to the following provisions: A. Dwellina Units -Dwelling units shall contain not more than one certified solid fuel burning device and, in addition, not more than two gas appliances; or in the alternative, not more than two gas log fireplaces and, in addition, not more than two gas appliances. B. Restricted Dwellina Units -Restricted dwelling units shall contain not more than one gas log fireplace and, in addition, not more than one gas appliance. C. Accommodation Units -Accommodation units shall contain one gas fireplace or, in the alternative, one gas appliance. All gas fireplaces located in accommodation units shall be constructed in such a manner that access to the firebox is 3 prohibited except for the purposes of repair and maintenance. A sign shall be placed on each fireplace unit reading: "Caution -Gas Fireplace Only." All gas log fireplaces and gas appliances in accommodation units shall be equipped with a timing device or a thermostat which shall cause an automatic shutoff of the fire for safety and conservation purposes. D. Common Area -Any common area shall contain not more than one certified solid fuel burning device, or in the alternative one gas log fireplace, or in the alternative one gas appliance. 8.28.050 Non-Conforming Devices. Fireplaces and Appliances A. Non-conforming solid fuel burning devices, certified solid fuel burning devices, woodburning fireplaces, gas appliances and gas log fireplaces, lawfully constructed or installed prior to the effective date of this ordinance, or for which a completed Design Review Board application was received by the Community Development Department prior to August 15, 1991, may continue, subject to any limitations or restrictions contained in this Section 8.28.050. B. If one or more separate conforming or non-conforming dwelling units, restricted dwelling units or accommodation units are combined to form one larger dwelling, restricted dwelling or accommodation unit, the newly formed unit shall comply in all respects with the provisions of this Chapter 8.28. C. No existing woodburning fireplace shall be moved or substantially altered, unless it is modified in such a manner that it complies with all the provisions of this ordinance. D. Whenever any dwelling unit, accommodation unit, restricted dwelling unit or common area is substantially destroyed, whether by the intent of its owner or lessee, or by natural disaster, if such dwelling unit, accommodation unit, restricted dwelling unit or common area is restored or reconstructed, it shall meet all the provisions of this Chapter 8.28 8.28.060 Coal Usage Prohibited The burning of coal within the Town of Vail is prohibited. 8.28.070 Refuse Burning Prohibited The burning of refuse in any solid fuel burning device is prohibited within the Town of Vail. 8.28.080 Building Permits A building permit shall be required for the installation of any certified solid fuel burning 4 device, gas appliance or gas log fireplace. However, to encourage the conversion of wood burning fireplaces and non-certified solid fuel burning devices to certified solid fuel burning devices, gas log fireplaces and gas appliances, all applicable building permit fees for such conversion shall be waived by the Town of Vail. 8.28.090 Penalties It is unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Chapter or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any person performing any act prohibited or declared to be unlawful by this Chapter or failing to perform an act required by or otherwise made mandatory by this Chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than four hundred ninety-nine dollars ($499). Any such person shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which a violation of any provision of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted by such person and shall be punished accordingly. In addition to penalties provided in this Section, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be deemed a public nuisance, and may be by this Town similarly abated as such, and each day that such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense. Section 2 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or 3 repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1991. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the day of - , 1991, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1991. Kent R. Rose, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Town Clerk 6 EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING 551 BROADWAY OFFICE OF 7HE _ P.O. BOX 850 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 (303) 316.8605 FAX: (303) 3~8.7~07 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO July 11, 1991 Kent Rose, Mayor Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mr. Rose: The Board of County Commissioners supports the concepts discussed at the meeting in Avon on June 24, 1991. The formation of authority to manage and pay for the purchase of the Berry Creek 5th Filing. The cost of the property being paid through an intergovernmental agreement between Eagle County, Arrowhead Metropolitan District, Beaver Creek Metropolitan District, Berry Creek Metropolitan District, Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District, Town of Avon and Town of Vail. Eagle County sees the Berry Creek 5th Filing as a valuable resource which should be kept in public hands preserved as open space and for recreational uses. Sincerely, EAGLE COUNTY -eo~- George A. Gates, Cha>sman Eagle Board of County Commissioners GAG/jcd '~~1 TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-4792157 July 15, 1991 Dear Vail Resident: On behalf of the Vail Town Council and Town of Vail staff, I thank you for taking time to attend the Mayor's Breakfast, held at the Vail Racquet, Club a fe~v weeks ago. Your participation and input is valuable and well received. Council members and Town staff have carefully noted your comments and areas of concern. Enclosed is a recap of this meeting, with responses to individual issues raised, and if you would like to discuss any of these issues further, please feel free to contact me or Ron Phillips any time. Again, thank you for taking the time to join us. Feedback and citizen involvement is critical in our continued efforts to provide quality services for the Vail community. Sincerely, Kent Rose MAYOR'S BREAKFAST • May 28, 1991 Notes Christy Hochtl 1. Need to establish a dismount law for the safety of recreation paths, particularly near the school. There is a blind corner by the pedestrian overpass, and bikers ride too fast. Mayor's Response: This issue in particular has not been raised before, but will look into increasing bike safety in these areas. 2. Need to establish visiting hours at public parks. Need to monitor camping and partying as these activities disturb the neighbors -particularly in the Sandstone area. Mayor's Response: This is a continuing problem. We were looking at signs, but decided it might make matters worse. Will continue to explore options to mitigate the problem. 3. The freeway noise is increasing throughout the town, including the noise from jake brakes on I-70. Perhaps a sound barrier would help? Or maybe lowering the speed limit. The (Lazier) berm by Sandstone should be landscaped. Mayor's Response: A $1 million landscaping plan is being implemented for the interstate areas, and we are looking at further noise reduction needs. Lowering the speed limit on a federal interstate is not an option, nor is outlawing fake brakes. (It was recently decided that putting signage on the interstate encouraging trucks not to use their jake brakes would only make the problem worse.) Our best bet is to continue to pursue mitigation possibilities. 4. The vertical sign posts are frequently buried in the winter. Mayor's Response: Staff will pay more attention to this matter. 5. Bicycle safety used to be taught in the schools. Staff Response: Police Department Community Relations Department is implementing programs in the schools regarding various P.D. programs, should look at incorporating bike safety. Public Service Announcements are now airing on all three radio stations regarding various aspects of bike safety. 6. What percentage of the air quality problem is wood, sand, etc. Staff Response: According to a 1989 Air Science, Inc. report, 39% of Vail's air quality problem is attributed to highway dust, 57% to smoke from wood burning, and 2% to emissions caused by restaurants. Mayor's Response: We are looking at all contributors to air quality in effort to formulate a comprehensive plan. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 2 Dale McCall 1. Bicycle riders tend to forget they are responsible for obeying traffic laws. There is concern about encouraging guests to ride beyond their ability (i.e., Vail Pass). The Town should provide outlying parking for the recreation path at the Vail Pass access and the dismount areas must be seriously addressed. 2. The traffic laws need to be enforced, and the Town needs "good will ambassadors" who don't just hand out tickets. We need to establish a bicycle safety program to make everyone aware of the laws, and get community approval before we start having serious problems. Mayor's Response: See above response. Discussion will take place before the Town Council regarding bicycle restraints and safety ordinances in core areas. The Council will discuss the possibility of incorporating the outlying routes. 3. The problem with fireplaces is not only air pollution, but depletion of our forests for wood to burn. Some of the new gas logs/appliances are thoroughly effective and should be encouraged. This would be addressing the issue of forest depletion as well as air quality. Mayor's Response: The Vail Town Council implemented a ban on all wood burning fireplaces in new construction, however, this was opposed by many residents. The Town Council has decided to allow one EPA approved wood fireplace in new construction, excluding hotel and lodge rooms. A three year voluntary program for conversion of existing units will also be put in place. The goal is reduction of existing units by 50% over three years. 4. The media could help us by editorializing on biking, safety rules, etc. Tim Morter 1. Jim implored the Council to keep an open mind to developing technology which allows woodburning stoves with emissions safety. The Town of Vail needs to keep ordinances loose enough to incorporate these types of units while at the same time addressing the air quality issue. Mayor's Response: See above. The Town will also be implementing apublic education program which will help residents understand the extent of the air quality problem and options available for addressing it. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES ' MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 3 Lew Meskimen 1. The Town should keep the Berry Creek parcel. Staff Response: Meetings have been held involving the public entities throughout the Vail Valley, in attempt to formulate a plan for keeping the land in public ownership. A public meeting was held on June 13 to discuss what the community foresees for the land. 2. We need more landscaping around the outlying bus stops, and need to police Town property better. Mavor's Response: Both of these issues will be looked into. 3. The Booth Falls berm needs to be finished. Mavor's Response: Last year when the Booth Falls berm was to be completed, it was discovered that compaction was inadequate. After discussions with attorneys, the Town brought in a third party engineer to test the compaction. He was not satisfied. The berm will be taken down and the large rocks will be sifted out. The berm will be compacted properly, and rebuilt by October, hopefully, at the latest. 4. The upper level of the Village Transportation Center should be used for skating and roller blading to keep them off the town roads. 5. Why is the Town pushing a change of at International Bridge (Willow Bridge)? It looks aesthetically bad and underrated. Town people feel like they are not being listened to regarding this issue. Mavor's Response: The bridge is not structurally capable of handling the weight we are imposing on it. The State has offered the Town a three to one matching grant to replace the bridge now. Because the need for usage by delivery and fire trucks will always be there, regardless of other restrictions we place upon it, the bridge will need to be upgraded eventually. Discussion is still taking place regarding details, timing, etc. Bob and Beth Ruder 1. Cyclists need to think about traffic laws, but drivers need to be more aware also. Need to continue the education of both motorists and cyclists. The dismount law is not necessary in East Vail. 2. The Town must also provide proper signage, information, maps, education, etc. to enhance safety for recreators in our Valley. By simply widening the roads, we didn't make attractive bike paths; for a little more money, we could have. A significant problem is that the bike paths are always dirty because of their proximity to the road. There is not this problem at the top of Vail Pass or on the Copper Mountain side. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 4 Mavor's Response: We receive a lot of the gravel that gets washed down from the top of Vail Pass. We have asked those who take care of that portion of the bike route to care better so we don't receive their gravel. Town staff will obtain brochures regarding Colorado bike laws to pass out at bike shops, etc. We are implementing an extensive signage program for the recreation trails and streets to assist recreators in getting around our community. 3. We need to address the many problems in the parking structure. The design is hard -parking between posts harms cars. The traffic inside is horrible. The first class/second class parking division (coupons vs. no coupons) is inappropriate and should be addressed. We went from having anaward-winning and out-of-sight structure to one which is very visible. Mayor's Response: Landscaping this summer will help. $500,000 is being spent on . landscaping the structure. Directions within the structure will be enhanced, the structure is being painted, and extra signage will be implemented. 4. We've missed the East Vail interchange altogether (coming from Denver) due to poor lighting at the interchange. Mavor's Response: Colorado Department of Highways is responsible for such things. We can raise the issue with them. 5. Need horizontal signs from Village to East Vail. Mayor's Response: Vertical posts are hard to read, so the signs in town were changed to make them easier to read. An extensive street signage program has been implemented throughout Vail. Many people like the vertical signs, though, so there is not much of a priority to change them on the outlying routes. Judy Gold 1. The bike paths in Summit County are so superior to Vail's. Landscaping at East Vail interchange could have included bike parking with maps. People coming off of the path need to understand that they are entering a car and pedestrian area. Mavor's Response: We will continue evaluation of our signage program. 2. What happened to Bighorn? Mavor's Response: Vail stopped referring to the area of Bighorn because many people thought it was a separate town. When it was incorporated into Vail, the name became East Vail. When the name changed, no one objected. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST Nvir.S MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 5 Jack and Toan Carnie 1. We need better signage in the Village and more advertised restrooms. Staff Response: An extensive signage program is being implemented throughout the town and on the recreation paths. We do make more portable restrooms available for big weekends and events. We work with VA to keep the restrooms open at the base of the Vista Bahn. Perhaps continue to explore restroom option. 2. We should keep Berry Creek; we need more softball down there. Response: See above. 3. Good job picking up trash in the winter and summer. Staff Response: TOV Cleanup Day had aturn-out of 261 volunteers and picked up 5.2 tons of trash. 4. There is no need for the police to be sitting in the bars in the evening. Give that control back to the owners of the baz and put cops on the streets. 5. It is a mistake not to separate the bike paths and roads like Sonoma, Tahoe, and Europe. By making the separation, you create more of what we have here. 6. Where does the lottery money do we receive? Mayor's Response: We get $8,000 per yeaz of lottery money. This is designated for parks. Most of the capital improvement money for parks, however, comes out of the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund. Bob Warner 1. Fireplaces should be banned. Gas logs have come a long way and are acceptable. 2. Bike paths are great! 3. If you ask people to dismount (bicycles), maybe it is a bigger issue than not. Art and Anne Kleimer 1. Thanks for the breakfast. 2. Need to pitch in for more beauty. Beauty and recreation are our business. Rather than battle the federal government and state regazding the highway, we should plant wildflowers -landscaping with nominal costs. Mrs. Lyndon Johnson has implemented a successful seeding program on the interstate. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES ~ _ MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 6 ' 3. The trees at the East Vail interchange are dying. Everything we do needs to enhance environmental aspects. Our environment is who we are; we need better guidance and leadership. Mavor's Response: The dying trees at East Vail were test species and are being replaced. The trees sitting at Ford Park are going into the Alpine Garden for a meditation garden and are not the Town of Vail's trees. 4. The bus stops need more landscaping. Leff Bowen 1. Perhaps we should break the town into Council districts for better representation. . Mavor's Response: This has been discussed and studied in the past, as part of the Caroselli study after which West Vail was de-annexed. It was decided Vail is too small and would not be effective; there is no perfect set of lines. In 1985, the Charter Review Committee looked at the issue and made amendments through the election process. Public opinion was that it was not a good idea. 2. I strongly support the new signs (Village); we need to get them out to East Vail. Mavor's Response: See above. 3. I have the largest open hearth fireplace in Vail; I strongly support the conversion to gas. I\Teal Donaldson 1. The Aspen skier numbers are down 45%? Staff Response: While we appreciate Neal's concern, upon checking the Aspen skiing numbers, the following was reported to Colorado Ski Country USA: Aspen Highlands skier numbers were down 3.5%; Aspen Mountain skier numbers were up 1.04%; Buttermilk skier numbers were down 8.5%; and Snowmass skier numbers were up 1.11 2. We shouldn't be dictating values for our guests. We need to strike a balance between maintaining standards and letting people make their own decisions. As with the case of fireplaces, it is wrong to tell people they simply cannot have them. There needs to be a balance. Staff Response: Balance is what the Town Council is trying to achieve in their handling of the fireplace issue. However, those residents who are wed to their traditional open hearth fireplaces will never believe a true balance is struck unless they can keep their fireplace as is. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 7 Peter O'Neil 1. I am impressed with employee attitudes and levels of services the guests receive. In 1990, Vail was not known as a "family" town; now, this is more the case. More people also realize we have a fragile environment which we must protect. We must keep that small town feeling. Larrv and Susan Ast 1. When will the Booth Creek area be removed from the hazard zone? Staff Response: Continuing litigation with contractor and engineer have delayed this. Hopefully, the berm/rockfall ditch issue should be resolved in the near future, allowing the change in zone. 2. East Vail is too dark, we need better lighting for late buses. Need to add hourly bus service, and add bike racks to buses. We need to keep cars out of the Village. Staff Response: This summer we are providing hourly bus service that was implemented last summer during the VTRC closure. New routes also make riding the bus into town more convenient than in the past. The town, as part of the recently completed Master Parking and Transportation plan, is looking at acquiring new, expanded, stand-up buses with carry-on ski capacity. Perhaps the possibility of bike racks should be explored? 3. There is a problem in East Vail at the intersections -one side is one street name, and the other side is a different street name. There is a real problem in the winter when the sign is buried. Sue Rvchel 1. Need to change the vertical signs to horizontal -very hard for guest too read. Mavor Response: See above. Laura Ciapetta 1. Roller blading is a problem throughout the state. Are we operating under a framework? It must be treated responsibly without being negative. Mavor's Response: Research regarding roller blading regulations is ongoing, and the Council will be discussing this issue in the near future. We want to allow it in certain areas, even though it's currently illegal in this state. MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES MAY 28, 1991 - PAGE 8 Dick Neal 1. What is the status of the Master Parking and Transportation Plan? Mavor's Response: The master plan is now completed and the executive summary is available from the Community Development Department. There will be public discussion of the plan at an upcoming Town Council meeting. Peter Tamar - 1. We need to start thinking on a more regional basis. We need to recognize that Vail needs to take the leadership on transportation, affordable housing, air quality, etc. Should continue to pursue Berry Creek and regional recreational facility. Staff Response: The Berry Creek effort and regional transportation have been handled on an intergovernmental level. Hopefully this is the beginning of handling more Valley issues in such a manner. See above for more on Berry Creek. 2. Should not continue the "subarbanization" of Vail. Many of the public projects are resembling Aurora. We are losing the aesthetic uniqueness. We have overengineered many of our projects. In Aspen, they have contests to design structures. The Village parking structure is a blatant representation of this. 3. The Town should take over the frontage roads. The people of Vail would probably be willing to take on an additional expense. Mavor's Response: We get a certain amount of money from the highway revenue fund but not enough to take over the frontage roads. It is easy to say that peop]e will pay for a service that seems worthy, but in the end -are they? The price tag could be hundreds of thousands to millions to overlay. Allen Knox 1. We need to take a strong look at the bicycle issue. We must work to change the mindset from driving to bikes, and this can only happen if we find ways to accommodate cyclists. We need to pursue the biking market as a money maker. Mavor's Response: We are increasingly pursuing the biking market. We are working with the Vail Valley Marketing Board, Vail Resort Association, Vail Associates, to get maps showing routes for bicyclists, and we are increasingly pursuing the competitive bicyclists (mountain bike and road races). But, we must balance this with the safe accommodation of pedestrians and cars, as well. ' MAYOR'S BREAKFAST NOTES ' MAY 28, 1991 PAGE 9 ' Carolyn Knox 1. The professional cyclists are the ones who are dangerous, not the casual bikers. 2. We need a sign saying you are in Vail in East Vail. 3. Need a cop at the West Vail interchange as it's hard to get off I-70 at peak times. Inez Distelhorst 1. We need better control of dogs. Staff Response: Increased attention is being given to animal control in our . community, however, it is a difficult issue. Residents here are at times not extremely receptive to the types of dog controls which one would find in the city. The Town's new animal control officer is working on programs which balance the need for controlled pets with pet owner rights. EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING 551 BROADWAY OffICE OF THE P.O. BOX 850 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~ ~ ' ' EAGLE. COLORADO S 163 I (303) 328-8605 FAX: (303) 328-7207 7 . EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO July 11, 1991 Kent Rose, Mayor Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mr. Rose: The Board of County Commissioners supports the concepts discussed at the meeting in Avon on June 24, 1991. The formation of authority to manage and pay for the purchase of the Berry Creek 5th Filing. The cost of the property being paid through an intergovernmental agreement between Eagle County, Arrowhead Metropolitan District, Beaver Creek Metropolitan District, Berry Creek Metropolitan District, Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District, Town of Avon and Town of Vail. Eagle County sees the Berry Creek 5th Filing as a valuable resource which should be kept in public hands preserved as open space and for recreational uses. - Sincerely, EAGLE COUNTY George A. Gates, Chairman Eagle Board of County Commissioners GAG/jcd _ .e ;S. S ~ t pv~a~ i Thai ~ r`.' ' .Cp~ITR~A. Thy _ _ _ - . IRAN q ; - ~ . i ~ ~ 4 ~t r ~ ~i~ ~ ' O v.. d ~ _ - ~ ' sty ~ ~ ~~A j1~ ~ ~ -Ar ? w°-~a~ ~ t 'E.~•n~s, v t ~Cf ~FLS~ ja-},~.,""„r.SS~s ~ . s!' ; us ~t ~ . ~ ~ ".~a3 W' ~~~."fit` t ea„ i`~ ~ a r- t s,4 ,r.r~3 i .f y - 1 _,r^ ~ a: ~ .`g~ y .ra ,~~.n cif ~ ~~n ? r r ~t+ 4x r Qi~ ' y ~ ' 4 y, v r `j ,~'_i i ~ f,~; _ 'Si Sri 2 F f' :J' - -+1 ' ~ f ~ s~ t ~ - ~ - _ r - r ~ . , _ - - _:---'...rya,-- ~ - x. A ~w' ! I'- ~1~ T ,qe _ ~'x: i..C I M1 ' ~ LYE _ - i ~ _ Yt~" `~y ~ 1~ SOW-. ~ rover - } d ere. - a~~~:er~ and - - . i ~I( - { ' y~ 1 Y' r ' - ` _ ~ Y ,'..s - lk .{y~': tai ~Nd 9 ~ .~l`, .i Y Wi ~r, ` Nation ~ fit. ~ _ COVER s70RY ~ 4. ¦ ~ it i ' n of the arched west, Life would be impossible rs In a huge porno p rosperity that its Ovate without the Colorado River ~ Nowvh a` ery p R, created threatens the aver s su r:_ . - - - - ~ - _ , _ - r "~;~.e;>>~ _ ~ ~ .fit ` i 1_~• . fit. ~ e..~w- - _ 4 .t , way. ~yar } _ ~ f/r j 1 ~j~g T r i• i :.mac t ! ~ P' ~i r~ ~ rs ~ ,~,.+t j a' ,,i' . - ira -~i4 i ~ 7 .j _ i / `~i Y 3 ~ . ;a~` L~'_ ~ w . # n.- ,r t7 S= a 3 - `4,-~ ~~"z~ ~ ~ ~ i r ~ Y` f µ ~ ~-'~~~F ~ 3 ~ a _--^-f}•~"' >~j-L _ ~ . eft '~+~ir~~'v ti e~. "`~i ~ ,srl girt f ~ , ism' ~ .r"1. r „ki'.i.r. ~ ~ ` ,3 ~ J c...}p''r' # yt ¢ aCt ~ g r.as - . 'y` ~ ~ ~ ,J y ,.~JY' 4 sy ' t, ra~ ~{r 34' ~ ~f ' ~ w • g:L~ 21~~~. ~ { y Y.:.^ - ~f `d~~ ~ _t,o,,.3" .b 1~ ti f y 'j~- ric , ~ 11~~ ~ z L~ ~ t 1 ~ ~ 4+ ,X~ b~~,yf ~S Y Ryf' 1 _ ~F ~ ~ ~ }fit y.. Tom'""r, ~ ~ r. 4.i..,. .3-y vb «xt .gy~*si7 z-. ? Tt K { ,rr... 1, x^'7""3«. cr' ..r^ i. r :*.Y' ~..X~*'~a~k ~ ...rrr gyn. i~~ - ....~a'+tti.5. ri~*'T?=:..sv .r~F ~ y ~ t.,,+tw'`..,w.r[ _ . ice. `;~rrr..~if. m n.~~4_~:.5 u.' i~ I J Nation - s - J ~i N ' s ..y:... ,kl i, . a .a ~ a ' WYOMING, ~ . , ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ..l . F z,. C 100 mi: ~i ~ ' ~ ~ - 6 ~ ~u~ it 0 ~ ~ 150 km ~ x ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~ GrealSalt ~ Salt: s t ~ ~ ~r Lake Lake ~ g lY ` _ - UTAH ~ ~ ~ " COL"ORADO A LL _ l~~~s'~~, ~~'13~_-~ `i,~rr ~ ~ , O~ Y - ,GUS r~ 4 ~ ~ ,P ~ y~~ ~d~ j ~N - 9 Q_ o~ pq~3 0 O~ i I r 11 M se f ~ i ° ~V'.5:. C~ ~ 4 -'1 t ~a~r d 0 ~ ~~4 ,fir AreaaF ~ ~ i"" ~1~~~ ~ ,4,,.,.~~ a~ r o, main map ~~r .l ti Ci• ~ t ~,;v A , .t° j ~ Lake Powell .~San~jUao, n° , 6 T NEVADA ~ _ t Lake Mead k Glen.. ''s~ r~~.~ " =;tz lasVegas Grand _Canyon o~ t, 'k=, 1 - ~ ',Canyons Dam G ~ ~ r ,Hoov t sr, ~ , 1n~ '~~S ' .Dam • ~ ~ _ ^,4 f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > - Lake Mohave ~'rpj ~ ' ~ ~ " .SKEW. CD'? -<~..x J f„'I~' CALIFORNIA ~ Davis'. Co~oi ~ -?;,Albuquerque • _ ` Dam.Lake Havasu. - dao ° ;l s ' . A ZONA ' ~ - ~.r ; , . I Tip egg m,..~ - Dam a~'~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ a. s.. y ~q .Salton - ~ A ueduct ~ z ~'t ` Sea •.'Im erial P enix f 1?: a"' V ~1 r ,¢'.t. ~~i e P or Canal •y c ' ~=4an Diego Dam ~ :z,, W t All=American ~Tu On,,`" ~ s- ."R. ' i~ •Canal ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ ~ 7'~ tR • _ ~ - ~ ~ ~~a %/pm a M E X I Oi O` " ,TIME Map by Paui J.~Pugliese "s GLEN CANYON DAM Enormos By PAUL GRAY generates 12 million kW of electricity a year. Stretches of the river remain as they he Colorado River begins high once were and provide habitats for fish, used to surge into the Gulf of California, above the tree lines, amid the birds and wildlife, including a number of depositing ruddy-colored silt that fanned glaciers and snowpack on the endangered species. People come here to out into a broad delta of new land at its western slope of the Rocky play. Six national parks and recreation ar- mouth, hardly ever makes it to the sea any- Mountains. Icy rivulets collect eas along the Colorado's shores support a more. The once mighty Colorado fizzles and drip into streams, trickling and then multimillion-dollar recreation industry of into a trickle, its last traces evaporating in plunging downward. In the peaks of east- boating, hiking, fishing and whitewater the heat of the Mexican desert. ern Utah, where the Green River hurtles rafting. "The Colorado is not in good shape," south from Wyoming to meet the Upper Life in much of the American West says Norris Hundley Jr., a historian at Colorado, the water starts getting serious. would be unimaginable in its present form ucLw. "It essentially exists in a strait- Itwants to reach sea level-in this case the without the Colorado. Those cascading jacket." Last April the Arizona stretch of Gulf of California, some thousand miles to fountains adorning Las Vegas casinos? the Colorado was named "the most endan- the southwest-and nothing natural has Take away the river's largesse, and there gered river of 1991" by American Rivers, a ever managed to stand in its way. In its would be tumbleweed blowing along an Washington-based conservation group. A slashing, headlong rush, the Colorado abandoned Strip. San Diego could- turn prolonged drought in the U.S. Southwest, gouged out a pretty impressive piece of into a very thirsty place should something now in its fifth year, has dealt the Colorado sculpture known as the Grand Canyon. go wrong with the river: almost 70% of the a double whammy. Less snow to melt at its The river has been running in this rut for water its citizens use every day is piped in sources means less water coursing down- s million or 6 million years. from the Colorado. And what of Cali- river: reduced rainfall elsewhere means In the past half-century this mountain- forma's Imperial Valley, which grows a even greater demands on the diminished moving, gorge-cutting force of nature has major portion of the nation's vegetables? flow. been tamed by a spectacular system of Goodbye Colorado River, hello cactus and The recognition that the river is a finite dams and reservoirs. Today the domesti- mesquite. resource has been slow to dawn in the cited Colorado dispenses water for 20 mil- But while the West has bloomed on the West, where rugged individualists have tra- lion people in seven states and for 2 million river's bounty, exploding populations and a ditionally cocked a snoot at natural restric- acres of farn~land. The river's urgent yen prolonged drought have had an ominous lions. rolled up their sleeves and hacked or for the sea, held in check by 10 major dams, effect on the Colorado itself. The river that drilled the world of their dreams out of the r 22 TIME, JULY 22, 1991 • ' - rd ' i.~t~,,y, - ~r~:,= - ter.=e - - i ) a~ ~ ~ _ y1C ~ .ns y..,... ~ 1 _r..~~.,Y~4'~s.~: _ of ~ _ k f mot;-. ,t~~'9: ~ m_'~~~,r,,~'.?*, s--- i ~ ~ { w { ~ i T $ Wls-rp r.p. r A ` bpi a Y q u~I ~ `~3 7'C "T-. A G....r.. iF ~ ~ ~ L 1~+'.,'Tt~' ['7 t r °~c..rc-ten? S "L.y;- i ,I i _ ~ ? _ r ~r3`~, ~S ~ ~ .5~~~, ~m i,. j; - r ~ ~ ,^~~,•'-f•++N ~ }.rte ~ ;"a.~'~• ~ , r~ ~`:~~a ~ -,'c'am, _ '3 1 _ ~ s-..R~t' "'~d r' hew a ~ ~ . ~ -t - > r~~ .eE~<+~ ~y~. "GtiY ,.r '°,~3"7'+' bs ~;,,,;c~-st~,...~, c ~ - ~ ~ . I - water projects like this have turned the raging river into a thoroughly domesticated stream i wilderness. Something in the Western tem- Basins would each receive 7.5 million ture and the past. It's about economics. It E. perament strives mightily to deny that acre-feet annually. (An acre-foot is the will be the most important commodity in j much of the region is adesert-witness the amount of water needed to cover an acre dictating the future. It's the most serious tropical extravagance of Beverly Hills, the of land to a depth of 12 in., approximate- confrontation that the West has engaged in emerald golf a~urses of Palm Springs, the ly 325,000 gal. That is enough to fulfill in 100 years." ubiquitous swimming pools throughout the needs of a family of four or five peo- The combatants in this latest version " • the West. ple for one year.) A 1944 treaty guaran- of the West's long tug-of-war over water E The Colorado has always been a teed an additional 1.5 million acre-feet to are more numerous and clamorous than source of contention, but the current Mexico. All fine and dandy, except for ever. The four Upper Basin states have al- problems surrounding it are prompting one thing: the Colorado's output was ways regarded the three in the Lower Basin more alarm than ever before. Plans are grossly overestimated. Instead of the with a gimlet eye. The upper states have being made for an unprecedented sum- 16.9 million acre-feet estimated to be never used all the water allotted to them; mit conference in November of the Gov- there for the dividing, the river has been the surplus could be, and often was, picked . ernors from the seven states served by flowing at a rate of only 14.9 million; up by the lower states-mostly California. the Colorado. And almost certain to during the present drought, that figure No one minded as long as the river seemed come up, whether or not it is on the offi- has dropped to about 9 million acre-feet inexhaustible; now the upper states fret ; cial agenda, is the 192' Colorado River a year. that the lower states have grown accus- Compact, the agreement that divvied up Even the possibility that the 1922 com- toured to-and have prospered on-more the water among the Upper Basin pact might be revised raises hackles in than their fair share. Across the region and states-Utah, Wyoming. Colorado and all seven states. Already, fierce controver- within each state, powerful interests have New Mexico-and those in the Lower sies over the Colorado are swirling in staked out claims to the river's overallocat- Basin-California, Nevada and Arizona. courts and legislatures. When there is no ed waters: This crucial document facilitated both longer enough of a vital resource to go the astonishing development of the West around, who is entitled to what portion and FARMERS. Agriculture has traditionally I and the problems that followed as a re- why? Says California Congressman been the biggest beneficiary of the Colora- suit. Originally the compact looked like George Miller: "The heart of the West is do's water, receiving some 80% of the riv- simplicity itself. The Upper and Lower water. It's about winners and losers, the fu- er's allocated yield. This is chiefly because TIME,JULY22, 1991 ?3 ~ r I ~ Kyl. ' ~ .S LL 4 (F tt I~.e. ~ i)Ji s' ' ~ F t JJ >t ~FJ J 1 t S Y y d 4 5 i F ~ ' ~ ~v i ~1 _ ~F 3 u-.*)~+S x~F i..y 1S_ - s~~ `~ry { ~ ~~e Its: 1 _ + i~~ _ -mot ~ ,y j -~T '~.'k ~ i£ i~ `S ( N GILA RIVER A Pima tribal leader sifts the dry bed of a Colorado tributary south of Phoenix ' ~ the farmers and ranchers got there first. A cially in the Upper Basin, and some ranch- CITIES. Like the rest of the nation, the f h central tenet of Western water law-a ers have succumbed to the repeated temp- Southwest has been growing increasingly ur- fiendishly complex body of statutes and tations to sell some or all of their water ban.Whatwereonlyrecentlyone-horse out- precedents-is the concept of "first in rights to parched urban areas. Whether posts now exfoliate for miles into the blazing time, first in right." Whoever was initially similar water marketing should be permit- environs, their citizens housed in air-condi- granted alegal claim to water tended to ted across state lines is a matter of fierce tinned comfort and assuming plentifulwater keep it and, all other things being equal, to debate. Some experts estimate that Colo- as a God-given right. Among the seven states pass it down to descendants. rado could reap $140 million in new reve- served by the Colorado River, California has Furthermore, farmers have been fa- Hues if the deal goes through. But the sale become the 800-Ib. gorilla at all negotiations, vored not only in how much water they get of agricultural water rights could cause its cities expanding, their thirst apparently but also in how much they pay for it. Much many farming communities to dry up and unquenchable. The Old West here comes of the water available from [he Colorado vanish. into direct conflict with the New: the leath- has been produced by federal reclamation If large-scale transfers of Colorado Riv- ery rancher in Wyoming with his herd to wa- projects such as the Hoover Dam, and the er water rights become a reality, the experi- ter vs. the condo-dwelling Sybarite in Lagu- government, to encourage agricultural de- ence of Crowley County in eastern Colora- na Beach with a Porsche to wash and two hot velopment, has made this supply available do could become a somber indicator of the tubs to keep filled. The Metropolitan Water to farmers at low cost. This practice has led future. Starting in the 1970s, farmers along District, responsible for findingwater for the to wild pricing disparities; some farmers in the Arkansas River, a separate system from cities of Southern California,. is widely re- Colorado get their water for $400 an acre- the Colorado, began selling their water garded by competing parties with fear and foot, one-twentieth the amount it costs rights to the mushrooming cities of Colora- suspicion. SaysJerry Zimmerman, executive neighboring municipalities. do Springs and Aurora. Prices soon soared director of the Colorado River Board ofCal- This generosity in a time of shortage is to more than $700 an acre-foot. Now what ifornia:"Californiaisbeingaccusedofutiliz- now under attack. On the one hand, critics used to be 70,000 acres of irrigated land has ing other states' water and attempting to are pointing out the often wasteful uses of shrunk to x,000 acres, and the closing of continue to use water that other states may water employed by Western farmers: the dozens of farms has wrecked the local tax need at some future time." practice of irrigating fields by flooding base. "We're drifting back to dry-land des- The battle over the Colorado's waters them, thus allowing much of the water to ert," says farmer Orville Tomky, ~vho has has grown even more frenzied because of ~ run off the fields or bake off in the heat; farmed in the county for 40 years. "Every- the five-year drought. So far, California j the production of "thirsty" crops like rice thing is slowly drying up. The cities have has been able to cope with water shortages, I and cotton in areas only inches of water bought nearly all the water in the county. which have been exacerbated even further away from being desert. Maybe we'll just default and be taken over by its booming population, by siphoning On the other hand, some farmers, espe- ' by the state." off the unused portion of the Upper Basin 24 TIME, JULY 22,1991 ' } . 9..........--.-...-^__._____ ,Y.., . - - t .F~ ~ ' ~ _ - y.- ~ ~ ~ mac`' _ ~ r.- 4 8 i g s~ I , i N IMPERIAL VALLEY Only plentiful irrigation stands between lush farmlands and the desert m r T ~ states' allocation from the river and en- leases huge amounts of water through giant 'Boulder lawyer John Musick, who special- p couraging conservation. turbines to meet peak power demands in izes in water issues. "They have time and m But the time when such halfway mea- places as far away as Phoenix. These dra- the law on their side. They have a solid sures will no longer suffice is rapidly ap- matic surges of water create artificial i case, and they're dead serious. It's like a preaching. For the first time last year, Ari- "tides" that, environmentalists complain. ~ huge bill finally coming due." Because of zona started taking much of its share of erode the sandy shoals along the river's treaties and agreements between their river water for fast-growing Phoenix and banks and damage breeding grounds for tribes and the Federal Government, Native Tucson, leaving its larger neighbor to face fish and waterfowl. Americans living on reservations along the the possibility of a short supply. Within Cal- ~ Colorado River have, in many instances, ifornia, farmers have become alarmed at ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND REC- i claims on water that date back to the mid- the possibility that the water they need for REATIONALISTS. Both groups were in 1800s. Thanks to the first-in-time concept. irrigation may be diverted to the cities. Says shorter supply when the Colorado was be- they are often the senior owners of river John Pierre Menvielle, athird-generation ing harnessed than they are today, and rights, and they have begun making their farmer in Calexico, on the southern edge of their concerns often diverge. Arecreation- I case vigorously in courtrooms. Combined, the Imperial Valley: "People in Los Ange- alist's dream-a motorboat rally on Lake the Native American claims amount to a les and the coastal plain say, `You guys are Havasu, with plenty of beer-is a nature sizable chunk of the Colorado's annual wasting water. We ought to get it from you.' lover's nightmare. But some vacationers i flow. While few observers expect all these They're overbuilding, they're out of control. come to the river merely to hike or look at ~ claims to be upheld, the lengthy period They want us to put limits on what we're do- wildlife, and they are as likely to be dis- during which tribal rights were convenient- ing. Where's their limits'" turbed by the encroachments of civiliza- ly bypassed or ignored by the white settlers tion and mechanized control as are the en- seems over for good. UTILITIES. The era of stringing huge vironmentalists. Says Darrell Knuffke, the dams along the Colorado peaked during the Central Rockies regional director of the MEXICO. The Colorado has long been a '30s and'40s and is long gone. And the rela- Wilderness Society: "As the river has been prickly subject between the U.S. and its Lively cheap hydroelectricity-and hand- divided, subdivided, ditched, dammed and neighbor, and at the moment tempers some profits-generated by existing facili- diverted, everyone's interests except the south of the border are steaming again. ties is now being weighed, and found land's have been considered." How can a The current flash point is Southern Cali- wanting, in the light of other concerns. One river nourish a vast area and still remain ~ fornia's plan to line with concrete the All- I long-running dispute concerns the Western true to its pristine past? American Canal, which carries water to the 4 Area Power Administration's operations at Imperial Valley, to save 106,000 acre-feet ~ the Glen Canyon Dam in Arizona, just NATIVE AMERICANS. "The Indians that seep uselessly into the ground beneath i above the Grand Canyon. The agency re- are the giant `What if?' on the river," says ~ the canal each year. On the one hand, this i k TIME, JULY 22, 1991 ~ I I O~ i b l it t L i i i. ; a ~ ! i' - ~ ti I LAKE HAVASU Ttte than-made waterways are a vacationer's dream and a nature lover's nightmare _ ~ I is an ambitious project in water conserva- manage the Colorado and its myriad prob- rado, everyone who depends on the river I lion; on the other, Mexican officials say the lems. "They're a bunch of dam builders," is likely to feel some pain. Every adjust- loss of seepage will deplete the under- says former Arizona Governor Bruce Bab- ment made to please one group will inev- ground water supply around Mexicali. bitt, "and there aren't any dams to build. itabl~~ have unpleasant consequences for To make up for this loss, some feel a They have been unable to adjust to the new the others. Farmers and city dwellers I fair exchange would be to compensate reality." cannot possibly both be satisfied. Envi- i Mexico for the lost share of river water. So In addition, legislators with an eye on ronmentalists and Native Americans, ai- far, the U.S. insists it is living up to its legal the government's mounting deficit aze Iles on many issues, split over the Colors- ' obligations and that no increase is called taking stock of the huge federal subsi-. do: the tribes want more development on for. But this attitude could affect U.S.- dies-amounting to billions of dollars- their reservations, the environmentalists Mexican relations on other matters requir- flowing west to farmers for Colorado less. water conservation Char is good for ing cooperation, including curbing drug River water. Says California's Congress- California turns out to be bad for Mex- smuggling and illegal immigration as well man Miller: "The drought and deficit ico. Babbitt calls the development of as a proposed U.S.-Mexico free-trade trea- have caused people from Pennsylvania, the Colorado an "extraordinary achieve- ~ ty. Warns Al Utton, director of the Inter- Massachusetts and New York to reassess ment" but argues that the very success of national Transboundary Resource Center supporting a bad habit." this plan spawned the myth "that there is at the University of New Mexico: "It does No longer are top seats on powerful more water over the next hill. But there not make sense at this point for the U.S. to congressional interior committees filled by is no more water over the next hill." stand on the letter of the law. If we think "water buffaloes"-members of the West- Behind all the arguments, the claims ' only of ourselves on this, we may encoun- ern water establishment willing to approve and counterclaims, is the river itself, a ter Mexico thinking only of iuelf on other and support massive development proj- glistening thread winding through some J _ issues." ects. They have been supplanted by law- of the most spectacular and forbidding makers like Bill Bradley of New Jersey, terrain in North America. Nobody ever Further complicating these disputes rs chairman of the Senate's Water and Power toted a barge or lifted a bale on the Col- , the changing attitude in Washington to- Subcommittee, who are both cost con- orado; it is not that kind of river. Its gift ' ward Western water. The federal Bureau scious and sensitive to environmental and to ics surroundings has been not trans- of Reclamation was principally responsible ecological issues. Says David Getches, a portation and commerce but life itself. ; for the development of the Colorado; it law professor at the University of Colors- There is no more urgent task for the planned and engineered the big building do: "There's a revolution in the way the West than ensuring that the Colorado ~ projects, all funded by congressional ap- U.S. Congress looks at water." survives. -Re.. ~ ~ ~ i propriations. Critics say the bureau has be- However this revolution is played out, Jeanne McDowett/Los Angeles and Richard come an anachronism, no longer able to both in Washington and along the Colo- Woodbury/Denier 26 TIME. JULY 27..1991 O, ~d xe : 2anJ sr~~f ~ . Go can/ c /L TOWN OF VAIL MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Phillips Council Members FROM: Steve Thompson DATE: July 17, 1991 ' RE: Investment Report Enclosed is the investment report with balances as of June 30, 1991,. In June, we decided to lock in some of the rates in the two to four-year range. If the economists' predictions on economic growth and inflation for 1992 are accurate, extending our maturities should pay off. In June, we purchased the following treasury and agency securities: Securitv Date Yield Price Value Zero Coupon Treasury 11/15/95 7.82 $477,277 $700,000 FHLB Bond 6/25/93 7.08 500,000 500,000 The zero coupon bonds were purchased with G.O. Bond Reserve Funds. The zero's mature in 1995, the same time that the reserve will be liquidated and available for other needs. The average yield on the total portfolio of investments is 6.81%. The average yield on the reserve fund assets is 7.29% and on the operating fund assets is 6.600. Please let me know if you have any questions. cc: Steve Barwick Town of Vail, Colorado Investeent. Report Saeearv of Accannts and Investeent.s For the Annth Endina June 30, 1991 Ponds For Reserve Balances Perceetnae PercentnRe Ooeretina Funds 06/30/91 of Total Alloeed Nonev Narket Accounts Isee oaae ll Couercial Bante 11345,5201 1206,151 11139,3691 -1.09X SOX Nonev Narket Paeda 1207,840 11,E4S,214 f1,4S3.OS4 11.33X 100X Colorado Investeent Poole 11,461,374 11,462,374 11.40X 100X Total 11,324,694 11,451,365 St,976,OS9 21.64X Couercial Savings A Banks Loans • Cerkifirates of Deposit Isee Daae 21 i?aale County lestitations O.OOX Other Colorado tnstitatioas 1495,000 1495,000 1195,000 3.86X Notional lnstitntiona 1297,000 11,28T,000 11,289,000 (297,000 11,584,000 12.3SX total 1299,000 f1,9R2,000 !1,782,000 1297,000 12,019,000 16,tIX IOOX Percent.aae of Portfolio in 5avinas 6 Loans 13,89X t5X 0,3, Coverneeet Securities Isee pass 31 Reoarrhase Aareeeents 11,453,341 11,453,341 11.33X 7SX treaasrv Notes d Bills 1],207,401 1899,492 12,106.893 16.43X 100X CNNA's 1154,767 1154,767 1,21X 100X O.S. Savings Bonds 121,377 121.377 0.19X 100X Federal Aaencv Discnant Rotes ~ Bonds 14,233.498 14,233,478 33,OIX 100X total 15,619,023 12,352.833 19,969,856 6t,iSX Total Portfolio 18.923,119 14,101.198 112,824,915 100.00X Antnrina Yilhin 17. Months 19,817,573 1t, 148.365 19,965,938 17,91X Natarina Nithin 24 Mnnt.he SS00.000 f0 1500,000 3.90X Natarina After 24 Nonths 1406.144 11,952,833 12,358.977 1B.38X 18,1t3, 919 14.101,198 112. Bt4, 915 100, OOX Breatdovn of Reserve Fande 0.0, Boed Reserve 13,895,049 Chock Anderson Neeorinl 110,991 Bealtt Insurance Fande 1195,160 14,101,198 1/]S/91.i1n invse06 Money Market Accounts as of June 30, 1991 --For the Month of June— Institution Balances Type or Accounts High Low Average 06/30/91 COMMERCIAL BARK ACCOUNTS First Bank of Vail Operating Interest 4,8501 4.6001 4.6905 Balance 1615,259 141,112 1191, 401 (1359, 488) First Bank or Vail Insurance Interest 4.8501 416001 4.6901 $195,160 Balance Central Bank or Denver Interest 4.820% General Operating Account Balance 124,959 Total Couercial Bank Accounts (1139,369) LOCAL GOVERRMERT INVESTMENT POOL Colorado Trust Ilnvesthent Pool) Interest. 5.6001 Nelan~e $1,462,314 NOW MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS Federated Secorities Corp, U. S. Treasury Trust Reserve Account Interest 5.8201 Balance $220,309 Fidelity lavesteent Governsent Money Market Accounts Interest. 5.6305 Bond Issue Reserve Account =R Balance $1,024,905 General Operating_ Account Balance 1209,840 Total Money Market Mutual Fund 11.453.054 Total all accounts 12,116,059 #Account Subject to Arbitrage Rebate 9/15/91j1p inna06 Page I Certilicatee of Devosit na o[ ]ane 30, 1991 Bank Rage, Location Dare to Rates Purchase Natnrity Maturity Nntaritr Ins Connon field Date Date at Purchase False Sterliag Savings end Loan, Irvine, C~ S~IF 10,S00X 10.2SOX 10-~vr-89 02-Dec-91 966 !99,000 Bar Loan 6 Invest~eet Bank, East Oreenvicb, Bl, Reserved Faeds FD1C 9.300X 9.OSOX 1l-]a1-89 02-Dec-91 814 (99,000 Roaestend Savings ~ssociatinn. Niddletovn, P6. Reserved Fnnde SHIP 9,100X 8.900X tl-]nl-B9 02-Dec-91 864 199,000 East Bnnk, Ren fork, R1 PDIC 9.000X 8.900X ll-]a1-89 11-]a1-91 130 199,000 Neuters Financial Saviega Bank, Irvine, CA S~iF T.62SX 1.31SY iS-Jae-91 02-Dec-91 321 (99,000 Cardinal Federal Savings Bank, Cleveland, 08 SHIP 1.4SOX 1.J2SX IS-]an-91 O2-Dec-91 321 199,000 Nestern Federal Savings and Loan, Narina Del Rar. C6 S~IF 7.62SY 1.37SX IS-]an-91 02-Dec-91 321 (99,000 Panravo Savings and Loan, Roboken, RJ S~IF 1.SOOX 1.31SX 1S-Jan-91 02-Dec-91 321 (99,000 Glendale Pederal Savings and Loan. Ft, Lnaderdale. FL S~IF 1.62SY 7.31SX 1S-]an-91 02-Dec-91 321 (99,000 Colorado Federal Savings Bank, Sterling, CO S41F 1,S70X 1.671Y li-]an-91 02-Dec-91 319 (99,000 Coln~bia Savings, Denver, CO S~iP 1.ISOX 1.1SOX 29-]ae-91 02-Dec-91 308 199,000 First Federal Savings Bnnk.. Denver, CO S~1F 1.2SOX 9.2SOY 28-]an-91 02-Dec-91 308 599,000 Thatcher Bank Federal Savings Bank, Salida, CO SI+IF i.tSOX 1.2SOX 31-]an-91 02-Dec-91 30S (99.000 Cnlorndo Sarlaga Bank, Denver. CO S~IF i.4SOX 1.4SOY 31-]an-91 02-Dec-91 30S (99,000 Southern Financial Federal Savings Bank, Narreetoe, NA SAIF i.100X 9.000X 09-Peb-91 02-Dec-91 298 199,000 First Secsritr Savings Bank, N1 SHIP 1.200X 1.000X ll-Feb-91 02-Dec-91 t94 (99,000 First Aeigkta Bnek, Aoastoe. TX ` S~IF i.OSOX 9.OSOX ll-Feb-9] 02-Dec-91 294 (99,000 CORTIADED Certificates of Deoosit as of ]ane J0, 1991 Bank Rage, location Dava to Rakes Purchase Matnrity Natarity Nataritp Ins Cnnnnn Yield Dal.n Date at Purchase Yalse Blneboanet Savings Bank, Dallas, TX SHIP T.2SX T,2SX 11-Feb-91 02-Dec-41 291 599.000 la Jnlla Savings Aank, Indian Y~IIs, CA 9~IF 1.ODOX 6.ASOX 20-Feb-91 02-Dec-91 2AS {99,000 Santa Ana Snvinas and loan SHIP i, ISOX 1, tSOX 20-Feb-91 02-Dec-91 28S 199.000 lvndonville Savings Bank l Traet, Lvndonville, PT. Reserved Peeda FDIC 9,2SOt 9.OSOX 2B-]nl-A9 O1-]an-92 1011 199,000 ova Yield i.i16X 12.Oi9,000 Days t.o Matnrity 1~2 1/1S/91i1o invcdOS Paae 2 ~;^verneent 5ernrities as of Jnne 30, 1991 RRRlreasnrv Rates 6 Billsett Days to Days leterest Rate Pnrchase Natarity Nnlerity to Book Pnr Yvne Fand Cocoon Yield Date Date at Pnrchase Natarity Pelee Pelee Rond Pooled Cash 8,8751 7,170X 11-Nnr-86 IS-Peb-96 3628 1691 5230,000 5230.000 Bond Pnoled Cash 6,SOOX 6.607X O1-Frh-91 1S-Roy-91 287 118 5500,000 5500,000 Zero Debt Service 7.P20X 21-Jan-91 1S-Rov-9S 1608 1599 5199,192 5900,000 Bill Pnnled Cash 6.IBOt O1-FPh-91 21-Oct-91 26S 116 5111.101 SS00,000 Band Drhl Servirn B,250X B,2S9X JI-AeP.-R9 31-An¢-91 730 62 5100,000 5100,000 Avera¢e Years Yo Natarit.v 1.98 (2,106,893 52.330,000 Avera¢e Yield 7,21X RR~Reoerchaee A¢reeeeetet~~ Pnrchase Natnrity Book lnstitetion Yield Date Date Pelee Nor¢an Stanley x 9,8SOX O1-Jnn-91 O1-Dee-91 51,153.3U v Sinkin¢ Pend Investeent. to Retire 0,0. Ponds Re=CANA'SR~= YeA[P t0 Betieated Interest. Rate Pnrchase Natnrity Natority Years to Princioal Pool Cnanon Yield Date Date at Porehnse Natarity Ontetandin¢ SPO3 B.000X B,1ROX It-Nne-P.6 IS-Ort-OS 19,10 16,00 539,322 13003 P.000X 9.5907 21-Oct-86 IS-Oct-06 20.20 17,00 SS2,510 14659 B.000t 9.200X 21-Oct-B6 IS-Jan-07 21,20 18.00 562,905 Ave Yield 9,119{ S1S1,761 =xtU.S. Snvie¢s Boedsx«x Yeare t0 issne Natnrity Natarity Yeare to Book Natnrity Serirs Yield Date Date at Pnrchase Natarity Pelee Pelee PE 7.11pX O1-Oct-86 O1-Oct-96 10,00 5.26 521,371 530,000 yy=Federal A¢encv Discoeet Notee 6 BoedsRt= Dava to interest Rate Pnrchase Natarity Natarity Dnre to Book Natarity A¢enry Fond Coanoe lield Date Date at Parchnae Nntoritl Pnlee Pelee PflLR Pnnled B.BOOX 1,229X 17-Dec-90 ES-Seo-91 282.00 81,00 5250.000 S2S0,000 PflLR Ponied 4,192X 11-Oec-90 02-Dec-91 353,00 155.00 5233,178 5250.000 FNMA Pnnlyd 5.911X 09-Nav-91 OS-Aov-91 180.00 128,00 SS00,000 SS00,000 FBLB Poolyd 9,080X 7,O80X 2S-Jnn-91 2S-Jeo-93 731.00 126.00 5500,000 SS00,000 FFC Pooled 6.t00X 6,200X O1-Anr-91 O1-Ja1-91 91,00 1.00 5250,000 5250.000 FRLB Pooled 8.900X 6,000X 29-Anr-91 25-Oct-91 119,00 114,00 5500,000 5500,000 FPC Pooled B.OSOX 6,3S8X 11-Nar-91 Ol-Oct-91 201,00 93,00 51,000,000 51,000,000 FRLB Pnnled 7,ISOX 6.12SX 29-Mar-91 25-Nov-91 213,00 118,00 51,000.000 51,000.000 51.233,198 f1.2S0,000 Avera¢e lield 6,16X Avera¢e Dnve to Naterity 182 total 57,969,856 1/1S/91.i1n invtr06 Pn¢e 3 Town of Vail, Colorado lnveet~ent Report Sonarv o9 {cconnta and Investsents Por the Month Endisa Tune 30, 1441 Panda For Reserve Belnncee Percentage Percentage Ooeretiea Panda 06130/91 0[ Total {llo~ed Nonev Narket {ccoante Isee sage 11 Canercinl Bante If315,S201 5206,151 IS139,3691 -1.092 SOX Nonev Martet Feeds 5209,840 SI,t4S,214 51,453,OS4 11.335 LOOS Colorado inveat~ent. Pools 51.162,311 (1.162,374 11.401 1005 total (1,321,691 51,451,365 51,176,059 11.645 Couercial Savings 1 Banks tonne Cert.i9icates of Deposit Isee ogee 21 Engle Coantr lastitotione 0.001 Other Colorado Institatioas 5195,000 (195,000 5495,000 3,865 National Institotiona (299,000 51.287,000 51,289,000 5291,000 51,581,000 12.355 Total 5299,000 51,192,000 (1,782,000 5297,000 52,019,000 16,211 1005 Percent.aae of Portfolio in 5avinas 6 Loans ]3,895 255 O.S. Covernsent Securities Isee peas 31 Reoarrhase {areesente 51.453,341 51,153,341 11.335 155 Treasarv Notes 1 Bills 51.207,101 5899,192 ft, 106.893 16.135 1005 ORN~'s (151,761 5151,767 L 215 100X O,S. Snvin¢s Bonds (21.377 521.371 0,175 1001 Federal Aaencr Oiscoant Rotes {Bonds (4,233,178 54.233.478 33,015 1005 total 55,619,023 52,352,833 59,969,856 62.155 Total Portfolio 58,123,111 f4, 101,198 (12.821.915 100.005 .Nntnrina Nithin 12 N~nthe (9,817,513 52.118.365 (9.965.938 11,115 Nntnrina Nithin 21 Nnntha (500.000 {0 iS00,000 3.905 Nntorina ~7ter 24 Nonths 5406,141 (1,952,833 51,358,917 18.385 (8,113.911 N.101,198 512.824,915 100,005 Breakdown of Rexene Fonda C.O. Boed Reserve 53,895,041 Chock ~adereon Ne~orial 510,991 Realth Insurance Ponds 5195,160 54,101,198 9/15/91.i1a invstr06 _ ~.a~.9~ CONTRIBUTION POLICY TOWN OF VAIL 1. All contribution requests received by the Town of Vail will be processed in the following manner. A. All requests must be submitted writing using the Towns application for funding. B. All applications for funding in 1992 shall be sent to the Town prior to August 16, 1991. C. A verbal presentation must be made at the budget hearing. D. The Town Council will evaluate the various proposals based upon there overall contribution to the Vail community and whether or not the function or activity could be self supporting. Organizations and activities who provide the following benefits to the community will be given the most consideration for funding. 1. Health and human services 2. Marketing 3. Regional governmental issues related to Vail municipal services C,ld~.,~~.e. E. The Town recommends those organizations and activities which have required the Towns contribution in the past look for ways to become self supporting in the future. APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: All applications must be submitted to the Town of Vail by August 16, 1991. Any application received after that date will not be considered. Please send application to: Town of Vail Town Clerk office Pam Brand~eyer 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Please type this application Name of Organization: Contact person: Mailing address: Telephone: Amount of contribution requesting: Organization year end: Are your books audited? How will the contribution be used? Organization's mission statement: APPLICATION FOR TOWN OF VAIL FUNDING Instructions: Round all figures to the nearest dollar. Please present in as much detail as possible. Actual Estimates Prior Fiscal Budget Current For Current Budget Next Year Ending Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year / / / / / / / / Revenues: $ Total Revenue $ Expenses: Total Expenses $ Net Income $ Beg Fund Bal $ End Fund Bal $ . l.(~S 734! ~ ¢ MEMORANDUM TO: Town of Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department, Building Department Staff DATE: July 23, 1991 SUBJECT: Council review of staff recommendation concerning adoption of latest Building Codes and revisions to Municipal Code. ,K..~, 'E F I. BACKGROUND The Building Department is progressing toward adoption of the latest codes. These include the 1991 Uniform Building Code, 1991 Uniform Plumbing Code, 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and the 1990 National Electrical Code. After much staff debate we are proposing ,limiting our amendments and deletions within each code to a bare minimum. We are however doing an extensive review of the Town of Vail Municipal Code in order to upgrade much of the content of the Buildings and Construction section of the Municipal Code. II. PROCEDURES The time table for adopting the latest Building Codes and revising the Municipal Code is planned as per the dates listed below: July 23, 1991 Town Council work session review of Building Department Staff direction. August 2, 1991 First publication to public of intent to adopt new codes and revise Town of Vail Municipal Code. August 6, 1991 First reading of Town Council intent to adopt latest Building Codes and revise Town of Vail Municipal Code. August 9, 1991 Second publication to public of intent to adopt new codes and revise Town of Vail Municipal Code. August 20, 1991 Second reading of ordinance adopting latest codes and revised Municipal Code. August 26, 1991 If approved August 20 by Council then new codes and revised Municipal Code become effective. I i III. MUNICIPAL CODE REVISIONS A. The Council has previously reviewed and approved staff recommendation for revisions to the fee schedule for all fees charged for Building Permits. These changes will be reflected within the proposed revision to the Town of Vail Municipal Code. B. Practically all of the Municipal Code regarding roofs and their required assemblies per occupancy types is proposed to be deleted. C. Sections 15.08.010 through 15.08.050 concerning the Town Council review of all permits is proposed to be amended to reflect that the Town Council or the Building Department Staff is required to review and approve all building permits. D. Section 15.08.015 concerning Mailboxes is proposed to be deleted entirely. E. Section 15.28 concerning Water Closet Specifications is proposed to be deleted entirely. F. Chapter 15.32 concerning the Model Energy Efficiency Construction Standards is proposed to be deleted entirely. I PERMIT FEE INPUT INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION ZONES ZONE & TITLE MODIFIERS $PER SQ.FT. IDENTIFICATION 1.East Vail 1.2 $87.48 East of East Vail Exit. Includes all Bighorn Subs, Pitkin Creek Meadows, Gore Creek Sub, and Vail Meadows 2.Boot}i Creek 1.8 $131.22 Vail Village 11th, 12th, & 13th, Vail Mtn. School. Booth Creek area both north & south of freeway. 3.Golf Course 1.7 $123.93 Vail Valley 1st, 3rd, & 4th, Vail Village 7th, 8th & 9th, Northwoods and Pinos del Norte 4.Village Area 1.7 $123.93 Vail Village lst, 4th, & 5th. East of Vail Road to Gold Park. S.Lionshead 1.2 $89.48 Vail Village 2nd, Vail Lionshead 1st, 3rd, 4th & part of 2nd. Lionshead parking structure to West Day lot. 6.West Meadow 2.6 $189.54 Vail Village 3rd & 6th. Part of Vail Beaver Dam Area Lionshead 2nd, TOV Offices to residences adjacent to Vail Mountain. 7.Glen Lyon 1.4 $102.06 Glen Lyon Sub. & Cascade Village up S. Frontage road to V.A. Maint. Shop. 8.Matterhorn 1.0 $72.90 Matterhorn Village, Vail Village West 1st & 2nd, Donovan Pk, West Vail Exit to Coldstream south of freeway. 9.Intermountain 1.0 $72.90 From West Vail Exit west on south side of freeway. lO.West Vail 1.0 $72.90 Vail Ridge, Vail Das Schone 1st, 2nd & 3rd, Vail Heights, Buffer Creek Rd. west on north side of freeway. 11.The Valley 1.0 $72.90 Lions Ridge 3rd & upper sections of upper sections of Lions Ridge 4th, Casolar, The Valley, Cliffside. 12.Lions Ridge 1.0 $72.90 Part of Lionsridge 1st & 2nd. East Buffer Cr. Rd. to Vail View Dr. including Vail Run. 13. Potato Patch 1.8 $131.22 From Potato Patch Club north. 14.Sandstone 1.0 $72.90 East of Vail View Dr. to ABC School. 15.Spraddle Creek 1.0 $72.90 North of freeway to new subdivision. i Building Valuation Data j At the request of nwnerous building officials, (3uilding SGuularc/s offers the following building valuation data representing average costs for most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common for many cities, two general classes are considered for these, one for "average" construction and the other for "good." Adjustments should be made for special architectural or structural features and the location of the project. Higher or lower unit costs may often result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of "valuation" in Section 423 of the Uniform Building CodeT^^ and thus include architectural, struc- tural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. I The determination of plan check fees for projects reviewed by the International Conference of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from these figures which were compiled in April 1991. Cost per Cosr per Cost per Cost per Square Foot, Square Fool, Square Foot, Square Foat, Occupancy and Type Average _ cupancy and Type Average O~:fupancy and Type Average Occupancy and Type Average k 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: 7 DWELLINGS: (1~. JAILS: Type III-N 26.30 Type I or II F.R.* $ 70.40 Type V-Masonry 59.90 Type I or II F.R. .........126.70 Type V-1-Hour 22.80 (Good) $85.80 (Good) $76.80 Type III-1-Hour 115.20 0 RESTAURANTS: ~ Type V-Masonry Type V-Wood Frame 51.50 ype V-1-Hour 82.80 Type III-1-Hour 73.70 I (or Type III) 56A0 (Good) $7290 LIBRARIES: T e III-N 70.20 YP (Good) $69.70 Basements- Type I or II F.R. 92.80 Type V-1-Hour 65.30 type V-Wood Frame 49.80 Sc•mi-Finisher) 16.0(1 IYP,. II--1-I-lour 64.90 "fyp~ V-N 62.20 (C;ood) $6a.00 (Cklud) $ 111.20 I.YPc II-N 61.60 2 . SCHOOLS: type I-Basement Garage 29.50 Unfinished 12A0 Type III-1-Hour 70.60 Type I or II F.R.......... 88.70 2. AUDITORIUMS: (Good) $14.10 T e III-N 67.20 ~ YP Typell-l-Hour........ 63.20 Type I or II F.R........... 82.60 8 FIRE STATIONS: Type V-1-Hour 63.30 Type III-1-Hour 63.70 ! Type II-1-Hour 58.60 Type I or II F.R. 90.40 Type V-N 60.30 Type III-N 60.40 Type II-N 55.70 Type II-1-Hour 58.60 1 .MEDICAL OFFICES: Type V-1-Hour 58.30 Type III-1-Hour 62.70 Type II-N 55.70 Type I or II F.R.* 94.80 Type V-N 55.20 j Type III-N 59.80 Type III-1-Hour 65.20 Type II-1-Hour 70.50 22 SERVICE STATIONS: Type V-1-Hour 57.50 Type III-N 61.90 Type II-N 67.20 T e II-N 52.60 T ~e V-N 54.70 T ~e V-1-Hour 58.30 YP ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! YI YI Typell)-1-Hour 77.10 TYPelll-l-Hour 52.80 k 3. BANKS: Tyne V-N 55.40 Type III-N 73.60 Type V-1-Hour 46.40 6f Type I or II F.R.* 118.20 HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Type V-1-Hour 71.80 anopies 20.30 Type II-1-Hour 84.90 Type I or II F.R. 81.60 Type V-N 67.90 ' 3. TORES: Type II-N 80.90 Type II-1-Hour 65.40 7~ OFFICES**• Type III-1-Hour 96.30 Type II-N 62.30 T ~e I or II F.R.* 84.90 ype I or II F.R. 66.40 ~ Type III-N 91.90 Type III-1-Hour 68.20 YI Type II-1-Hour 40.00 A~ TYpe II-1-Hour 55.00 T e II-N 39.20 T e V-1-Hour 84.90 T e I I I-N 65.20 '~•tv yP ' ' ' ' ' ' " ' ~ ' ~ ' YP YP Typell-N 52.40 TYPelll-l-Hour 48.90 ' Type V-N 80.80 Type V-1-Hour 65.00 Type III-1-Hour 60.50 T e fll-N 46.10 4. BOWLING ALLEYS' -ype V-N 61.>3~• T e III-N 57.70 YP ~ • • • • • • • • • • • X ~ YP TypeV-l-Hour 39.00 Type II-1-Hour 39.50 1 .HOSPITALS: Type V-1-Hour 56.00 Type V-N 36.50 Type II-N 37.70 Type I or II F.R.* 129.60 e V--'N b3.40 f1. THEATERS: Type III-1-Hour 43.30 Type III-1-Hour 107.80 1 IVATE GARAGES: Type I or II F.R.......... 86.50 Type III-N 41.30 -,Type V-1-Flour 100.00 oocl Frame 18.30 Type V-1-Hour 36.90 !11, HOTELS AND MOTELS: Masonr 21.70 Type III-1-Hour 62.70 Y Type III-N 59.70 5. CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R.* 81.00 Open Carports 13.10 Type V-1-Hour 56.50 Type I or II F:R........... 78.00 Tyl>e III-1-Hour 69.90 Ih~, PUBLIC BUILDINGS: ,Type V-N 54.00 Type II-1-Hour 58.30 Type III-N 66.60 Type I or II F.R.* 98.90 _25. WAREHOUSES"': Type II-N 55.40 Type V-1-Hour 61 .00 Type II-1-Hour 73.80 Type I or II F.R.......... 39.30 Type III-1-Hour 62.60 Type V-N 58.20 Type II-N 70.50 Type II or V-1-Hour Type III-N 59.60 1 INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: T e III-1-Hour 82.60 23.20 ~ YP Type II or V-N 21.90 Type V-1-Hour 56J0 ~-~yhe I or II F.R. 44.90 Type III-N 78.90 Type III-1-Hour 26.70 YP ~ ~ • • • • • • • • • • • 54.20 T e II-1-Flour 30.60 T e V-1-Hour 73.00 T e V-N yp YP Type III-N 25.50 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: Type II-(Stock) 29.00 ~T pe V-N 70.00 type I or II F.R.* 110.60 Type III-1-Hour 33.80 19 PUBLIC GARAGES: ~ EQUIPMENT Type III-1-Hour 78.90 Type III-N 32.30 ~~ype I or II F.R.* 39.00 ~ AIR CONDITIONING: Type V-1-Hour 71.00 Tilt-up 22.70 Type I or II Open Parking* 30.50 _ Commercial 3.40 Type V-1-Hour 30.50 Type II-N 22.90 Residential 2.80 Type V-N 28.80 T 27.50 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1.60 ype III-1-Hour *Add 0.5 percent to total cost (or each story over three. **Deduct 20 percent for shell-only buildings. ***Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouses. REGIONAL MODIFIERS The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the building valuation data. In addition, certain local conditions may require further modifications. To use these modifiers, merely multiply the listed cost per square foot by the appropriate regional modifier. For example, to adjust the cost of a Type III-1-Hour hotel building of average construction for the Iowa area, select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cost from valuation data, $69.90. 0.80 X 69.90. $55.90 (adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern U.S. Modifier Eastern U.S. (cont.) Modifier Central U.S. Modifier Western U.S. Modifier Connecticut 0.95 Pennsylvania Kentucky 0.77 Arizona 0.82 Delaware 0.84 Philadelphia 0.96 Louisiana 0.78 California DistrictLof Columbia 0.87 'Other 0.83 Michigan 0.84 Los Angeles 1.00 Florida 0.74 Rhodelsland 0.94 Minnesota 0.86 San Francisco 1.13 Georgia 0.68 South Carolina 0.70 Mississippi.............. 0.71 Other................. 0.94 Maine 0.81 Vermont 0.80 Missouri................ 0.78 Colorado................ 0.81 Maryland 0.79 Virginia................. 0.73 Nebraska 0.75 Hawaii 1.14 Massachusetts 0.94 West Virginia 0.82 North Dakota 0.80 Idaho 0.80 New Hampshire 0.82 Central U.S. Ohio 0.80 Montana 0.79 New Jersey 0.91 Alabama 0.72 Oklahoma 0.71 Nevada 0.89 New York South Dakota 0.78 New Mexico 0.76 Arkansas 0.70 New York City 1.16 Illinois 0.87 Tennessee 0.72 Oregon 0.83 Other 0.87 Texas 0.74 Utah 0.75 Indiana 0.82 North Carolina 0.70 Iowa 0.80 Wisconsin 0.85 Washington 0.88 Alaska 1.30 W omin 0.80 Kansas 0.74 Y g 3g BUILDING STANDARDS/May-June, 1991 i ~ n, 1 i. ~w la.w..;c: n,. i n, r. it i r .1 I~. 9...-.~ „~i a ~i.. . n.... ~ ..i ...-I. ~ -i ~ a ,%:i....R..w: L!a3, r_4.nlYUrfr~~n .........................:.::::::.:::.:..:::::::.::::.:.::.:::.:::..I 1 BUILllING PERMI'C FEES T07AI V11~LFf~`F'fCIN ~ .....J FEES ~F 00.7'9?;$50P $ao.oo $30L00'CO $2,000.00 ) $20.00 FOR 771E FIRST $500.00 PLUS $3.00 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL $100.00 OR FRACTION 77iEREOF, TO AND INCLUDING $2,000.00 $2 00) 04 TO X35,000 00 ~ $65.00 FOR 711E FIRST $2,000.00 PLUS $10.00 PDR EACH ADDITIONAL $1,000.00 > :i OR FRACTION 77iEREOF, TO AND INCLUDING $25,000.00 :$25,00100:1'¢ $50,64000 i $315.00 FOR TIIE FIRSC $25,000.00 PLUS $7.00 PDR P.ACII ADDITIONAL $1,000.00 OR [RAC"ITON 77iEREOF, 7'O AND INCLUDING $50,000.00 $50,000 Ok'I'O $100!000 00 $490.00 I~OR 771E [7RSP $50,000.00 PLUS $5.00 FOR EACH ADDI710NAL $1,000.00 i> OR I~RACITON 77iEREOF, TO AND INCLUDING $100,000.00 $I OO,pO~'OO 7'A $$00,000.00' I $740.00 FOR 771E FIRST $100,000.00 PLUS $4.00 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL $1,000.00 OR FRACRON 7IIEREOF, TO AND INCLUDING $500,000.00 g5Q0;001 bil 1() $It100i6611;Q0 $2,340.00 FOR 771E FIRST $500,000.00 PLUS $4.00 POR P_ACI1 ADDI770NAL $1,000.00 OR IRACIION 77IEREOF,'I'O AND INCLUDING $),000,000.00 $1.,OOII,QQIbp ANIa;;UP $4,340.00 I~OR't'III: I9RS'1'$1,000,000.00 PLUS $3.00 I~OR EACiI ADDI'iIONAI. $1,000.00 ii >!:i OR PRAC110N 771EREOF. 2 O'fH t;:::. ::.iii:i:i:i?d:<i:; :i;:iii::::::><:>;::::::isisisiiiii:;;;;;;;;:;::>.::.:.:;::::s:i:i:ii?;l>>;:;;;::o::: ss::Jiii::?::»::i::::: ' ER INSPECTION FIrES. L INSPEC170NS OUTSIDE NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS (MINIMUM CHARGE TWO HOURS) $40.00 HR. 2. REINSPECRON FEE ASSESSED UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECITON 305 (g) OE 771E UBC. $40.00 HR. 3.INSPECIIONS EiDR WHICH NO FEE IS SPECIFICALLY INDICA7TiD INCLUDEING SPECIAL INSPEC710NS. STOP WORK ORDERS AND ZONING. $40.00 HR. * , . . ;'..c;::Yii::is:i:i;;;::i;: ;~cossisiliiiiiiii:;;:.::;.~::;:<.:;:::;::<.:<.::::>:. r.::r:~:r.:::::;,_ . 3 I LAN RI;VII',W P1•rI;S ~ ; IiUCLU1NG PLAN REVIEW FEESIIALLHE65%OE77IEBUILDINGPERMITFEE. 'PLU111I3I ~'(r PLAN REVIEW FEE SHALL BE 2590 OE 771E PLUMDING PERMIT FEE. n'II,GIIANICA L PLAN RF,VIBW PEE SI IALI. HE 25% OF 771E MF.CI IANICAI, PERMCP FEE,. WH[:NIVER ANY WORK i~R WIIICiI A PERMIP [S REQUIREU IIAS COMMENCED WI'1'IIOUE [1RST ?NVI'4TYCA1'I()N OH'['A1NING SAID PERMIT. 771E INVESTIGA7ION FEE SFIALL BE EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OP 711E DUII.DING, PLUMBING, MEC}IANICAL, OR ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE. ALL 077IER EEFS SHALL BE IN ADDi1TON TO 771E INV fSTIGA7TON EEE. k;r3S'~' 1 RA(:, lt.; PLAN REVIEW FOR A EAST TRACK PERMIT, WIIP,N PLANS ARE NOT TOTALLY COMPI,f`I'E SIIALI. PAY A PION REVIEW ITE EQUAL'1'071IE BUILDING PERMIT ITP.. RFS TA..UR.~INT rEE. fIPAL77i DGPAR'i'MENT PLAN REVIEW FOR KI7Y:IIENS SHALL HE A FLAT FEE OF $75.00 PI2FCC>NS7;RU(.',TIdN A IFE MAY BE CIfARGED WIZEN 77ME SPIiNT IS DFiTERMINED TO BE EXCESSIVE BY THE BUILDING OPIlCIAL. MI'+EI`IN~rSJ':;2>:::?::ii :>::4:Si'i:i (F,XCF.SSIVE RF,VIP,W IS OVER TWO ATF,F,TINGS OR FOUR FIOURS) $40.00 I I R. * lAM)~~~,1L~Nt1i'Y'pXA~'V;i;;:;i,i,i,i;i;i; ADDfI70NA1. PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED BY CIIANCGS, AUDPITONS $40.00 HR. i~EVtE~V:? "ia;`:<`::`:';it;<i OR REVISIONS 7b APPROVED PLANS. • OR 771E TOTAL HOURLY COST, WIIICIIEVER IS THE GREATEST. 77115 COST SHALL INCLUDE SUPERVISION, OVERHEAD. EOl1FPMENT. HOURLY WAGES AND FRINGE BENEITIS OE ALL EMPLOYEPS INVOLVED. 4 ELE(.'1'RICAL FEES N$W ~F$IU~bNTI~I.r ~ 77HS INCLUDES MODULAR HOMES, MOBILE HOMES AND 7RAVEL TRAILER, ALSO DUPLEXES „ , AND CONDOMINIUMS. (BASED ON ENCLOSF,D LI VINE AREA) NOT MORE THEN 1,000 SQUARE FEET $50.00 OVER 1,000 SQ. F1'. AND NOT MORE THEN I,S00 SQ. FT. $72.00 OVER 1,500 SQ. FT. AND NOT MORE THEN 2,000 SQ. FT. $89.00 PER 100 SQ. FP. IN EXCESS OF 2,000 SQ. FT. $4.00 i;C~IGYM~KC`~A~':'(!!; COMMERCIAL AND ALL 0771ER FEES, INCLUDING ADD, ALT, REP, AND SHALL HE COMPU7TsD ON ii'i2?~'EESi:i:i:i:::i:i::::::::::: i:i:i?:i:i:i: 7TiE DOLLAR VALUE OF 771E ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION INCLUDING HIXTURES AND IN T S ALLATTON COST777EREOF ANDS UCH FEE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: NOT MORE TIIEN $300.00 $42.00 MORE THEN $300.00 BUT NOT MORE TIIEN $2,000.00 $50.00 MORE THEN 52,000.00 BUT NOT MORE THEN $50,000.00 (518.00 PER EACH 53,000.00 VALUATION OR iTiACTIONTFIEROF OFTOTAL VALUATION. MORE THEN 550,000.00 BUT NOT MORE THEN $500,000.00 (517.00 PER EACFI 51,000.00 OR FRACTIONTNEROF OF TOTAL VALUATION PLUS 357A0 MOBILE IFOMES AND TRAVEL TRAILER PARKS PER SPACE $42.00 TEMPORARY POWER $50.00 RFINSPECTIONS ON ALL OF TIIE ABOVE $42.00 5 PLU BI M NG PERMI T FEES $15.0(1 PER $1,000.00 VALUATION. (VALUATION=3500.00 PFR TRAP OPF,MNC1 6 Ml;(,HANICAL PERMI T BEES ; $20.00 PF,R 1.00(1.00 VALUAI ION. (VALUATION-5500.00 PF,R OPF,NDJC) 7 UESIGN REVIEW IlOARU IEEE : - FEES:.. ''$0 09..... 4T0).......;::::?`.?>:'>;: $10,00:9.00: $20.00 $1.9jOQ7 O9 ....:'::1.(?'......... > $50;009:00': $50.00 $SQ,UQ1.~ ;>z<<;T~<<:>>:...... ,$'ibQtOD.O DU $100.00 $150'~OQ]~DO >T(J:`:~`<. '$500;00:0 00. $200.00 ::::$5001001 00..... :T4 $1',000QpQ QU $400.00 <:>::::0 YER.:> ;$1;090x000.00>I $500.00 8 CLEAN-UP DEPOSIT . '1 C~ F1~1?S $2,000 00 :.::1'O $25;009.00: $100.00 °,:1.$2510.0:] 00 ..:::TU :`::>:::;:.:$]00j00000.< $250.00 >~100~90:1 1'Q......:::>:':»:;::::$50.0;000:00:: $500.00 :$S.OQA0:190:>;::>>>S~<:>?:<:>::>:>:> 1:;090'990:00:: $750.00 U'ER:::>:>>>»:»:>:as><s:»:><>:::>::>:>'<: 1000>000~00: ...Q....._ $1,000.00 NOTE: EXCEP7TON ON CLEAN-UP DEPOSITS -ALL RE-ROOFING PROJECTS REpU1RE AT LEAST TIIF, MINIMUM DEPOSIT. REVENIIG'T09'OWN` 1 . III)11,DIN0 1'I~.AN I 1'I,AN - ~ ~ I'I,AN I,LEC. ~ 1'LI1M8: ~ M[?CII, DCSIUN PI±ItMIT: CHI?CK". Ji ..CNECK GIIIiCK~ ~ 11!RMIL ~ ['EILMI'C "l'ERMI"C 1 REVIEW~s~ 1'I!I: Dl11LDIN(i' I'I,UMIS.~ '~.i MI?CI1.. ~ FI!E I~~..~ I'I!13~ :PEE ' ~ I FEE 5161,167 I 589,8741 SOI 501 535.2071 (20,265 II S36,U66 510,155 l`~CJ'CAT:S<:?? 5352.7)0 ~ NIiW ItLE 1991 _RI! V!?Nl1C TO'TO WN~:: '1'U'1'A 1'1!It CI!N'C UI' INClt 1!ASI! UVI!It '1'UDAYB NEHS 7l% lSl/ILDIN(i ~ PLAN'' ~ ~ 1'I,AN". ~ t'1,AN ~ iiLliG.., al - 1'I,11M13. ~ ~ MECii.' DESIGN : PL'RMI'1' CI11'CK: CI11!CK .:.CIIECK i'I!ItMll I'IiRMI'f :~1'EKMI'I' + KEVIEWr I9sE~ ~~Ii[IILDIN(i '~PI,l1M11. MECI1. I'IiE ~ I ~ 1'EE~. I~EL' - + FEE i ' 5192,172 1 5124,9121 56,6261 SIU,I7S 1 535,909 1 f30,42R `I 548,126f 515,!85 `>I ()Ti1t:S:s::>::s::i::i S4ti3,532 INCILEABED REVENl1E 53131U9 I 5)5,0381 56,626 1 5111,175 l 57021 510,163 1 5123)60 ~ SS,030 I 5110,802 1NCRIiASE ~19%I 39% I~ N/A ~ I N/A I 2 01 SO%1 J3%I SU76 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ! IiXAMI'LI! 1 A NIiW RI:B. UNDI?IL'1'OUAYB FIiES. ~ - IlU1LDINCi > 50. 1+T. OF. ~ VALUATIONS :::GOB'I' OI'' .ISl11LDIN(i ~ "1'LUMISING MIiCIIANI(UI. I!LI!CI'ILICAI. PLl1MI11NG:~ MECIIANICAL "OBIS ~TO'l'AL COST IIOME I±LEC. 1'I,I1Mp. MltClli':~ : 1'I!12M1'I'. ~ PLAN 0111?CK I] t'LAN CIII:CK PLAN CIfL•CK h~ ~ I'f?ILMI'C'~' ~ PERMIT PERMIT' ~ PEES Flil?S 5606,000 ~ ~ 7,821 ~ 521,500 ~ 514,500 I 556,500 S2,7S8 ~ 51,179 I N!A I N/A I S769I 5145 SR4R T200 SS 099 EXAMI'I,li 2 A NIiW ICES. UNDIiR NIiW PEES AND NOT A 11A57"TRACT. IIUILDING S0= PT;.OI?_ <.i:r;:.;o; VALIIA'1'IONS`::::: ',..COST OF ISIIILDING I'I,UM131N0> M[!CIIANI(i~L' [LliCl'RICAI. PLUMISING tvSECHANIC!*.l: DRD-." :TOTAL COST ~ : IIOME~:~^> .::CLEC,~~:~ I'I,I1M11:~~ ~'MI!CI4. 1'EIiMCi'~ I'I,AN Cllf?CK 1'I:AN CIIIiCK .PLAN CIIIiCK~ PERMIT ~ I ~ PERMIT::' PERMIT?;'~~ C~ES~' ~ ~ IrEES f606,000 ~ ~ ~ 7,621 ~ f21,500 I (14,500 I 556.500 52,6(.4 St,73? SSA 5283 5]22 { S21R SI,130 ~ 5700 S6t703 N!RCCNT OP INCitI!ACC ON!R I!XAMI'1.1! 1 I ~ 13%~ 47%~ N/A ~ N/A -13% 50% ~ 33% 50%[~ ~ 31% EXAMI'Lld 3 A Nl?W IiliS. I1NDI?li NEW I~IiIdS AS A PAST 'CItAC'C" ISU11.U1NG $p.P'C.OI!;: " VAI,l1A'CIONS'::: ':iCQB"1'..Oh I31111,1)IN(i I'LIIMBIN(i MIiCIIANICAI, ELECTRICAL. PLUDIISING, MGCISANICAL i.'URll.:i; :TOTAL '.i COST:' IIOMR Ii1,liC. I'I,IIMIi. MEC11. I'IiltMl'1' I! !'LAN CIIECf: !'LAN CIIECK I'ISAN CIII!CK I'EKMIT I t'CR6UT I PERM!"1'i sPISES ' PEIiS 5606,000 ~ 7,R21 ~ 521,500 ~ f14,51)0'~ ~ SS6,SU0 I ~ 52,66.7 I 52,67,4, SS4I S2R3I fJ221 f2i81 51,130 + f3U0 571635 IY, ILCf!NT OP INail!ASI!OWR1!XAMI'L1! 1 + 13%+ 126%I N(A ~ N/A -13% 50% 33%{ 50% ~ 50% utS ~~a~~yr VAIL FIRE DEPARTMENT 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE CODE CHANGES - DRAFT: TOPICS FOR CONSIDERATION SECTION N0. CHANGE 2.105,2.106 CHANGE "POLICE" TO "PEACE" - Refers to duties and authority at fires and emergency incidents and assistance provided by "police officers." Colorado Revised Statutes does not recognize the term "police officer" but refers to "peace officer(s)". This change will bring the Uniform Fire Code more in line with State Statutes. 2.107 ADD THE WORDS "FIRE PREVENTION" TO INSPECTION Refers to Right of Entry to conduct administrative duties. Administrative law and Colorado Revised Statutes pertaining to powers of municipalities to issue administrative search warrants identifies "fire prevention inspections" specifically, as an allowable use of the powers granted under Article XX and permits municipal judges to issue warrants. The State statutes differentiate between administrative search warrants and criminal search warrants. This code change has been approved by the Municipal Judge and Town Prosecutor. 2.205(C) ADD "UNSAFE BUILDINGS OR DANGEROUS TO HUMAN LIFE" - The Fire Code as written permits the Fire Chief to order a structure evacuated only if it constitutes a "fire hazard" but does not address buildings made unsafe by reason of flood, mud slide, structural failure, chemical spill, or' any other cause. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings grants the Building Official authority to order a building vacated or evacuated but sets forth time frames for hearings, appeals and other legal proceedings that can take up to 180 days before an actual evacuation order could be held to be legally binding. This change has been endorsed by the Building Department. CHANGE "CONDEMNATION TAG" TO "HAZARD TAG" - The Fire Code permits the Fire Department to attach a "condemnation tag" to an appliance, fireplace or other equipment deemed to be unsafe or a fire hazard. It is commonly referred to as a "red tag." The .change is suggested because the word "condemnation" has certain connotations when used in accordance with the powers of emanate domain and the .process of "condemnation." We suggest a change to "hazard tag" more accurately conveys the real intent and avoids confusion. e ~V UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1991 EDITION - DRAFT AMENDMENTS PAGE 2 2.207 INCLUDE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY - Due to the number of occupancies owned by one party and leased to another, the Fire Department frequently finds itself faced with arguments that are intended to defer the cost of code compliance from either the tenant to the owner or vise versa. The concept of "joint and several liability" is specifically referenced in Colorado Revised Statutes. In cases where the liability or responsibility for code compliance cannot be readily determined or is disputed between the property owner and tenant, the term "joint and several liability" places both parties in a position of responsibility for compliance and assumes the responsibility for associated costs will be determined in accordance with civil contract arrangements between the two disputing parties (property owner and tenant). 2.304 INCLUDE ALL NFPA STANDARDS - This section lists referenced standards. State laws currently reference the NFPA standards and supersede many sections of the Uniform Fire Code. The National Fire Protection Association standards are well recognized and form the basis for most of the Uniform Fire Code requirements. Adding the NFPA standards into the referenced code(s) section will give the Town greater latitude in allowing options for contractors and provide a stronger basis for making decisions on equivalency. 10.203 Amend this section to include, "ACCESS TO STRUCTURES MORE THAT THREE STORIES ABOVE GRADE AT ANY POINT ON THE EXTERIOR PERIMETER, SHALL BE PROVIDED TO WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR AN APPROVED FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROAD. APPROVED ACCESS SHALL EXTEND TO 50$ OF THE EXTERIOR PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE HIGHEST POINT OF HABITABLE FLOOR AREA. BUILDINGS NOT MEETING MINIMUM ACCESS REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SECTION - 10.501(b). This addition to the Fire Code will help clarify "adequate access." This concept was first agreed upon in a meeting hosted by the Fire Department in May of 1980. A conscience. was reached between the Fire Department, Building Department and some 30 local architects and builders and has been used as a guideline ever since. UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1991 EDITION - DRAFT AMENDMENTS PAGE 3 The tallest ladders carried on pumper trucks can only reach up to a third floor window or balcony. The scope of the addition will pertain only to buildings that are high enough to require a ladder truck. Buildings that do not meet this requirement may be required to install fire sprinklers, a fire alarm system, or other special systems as appropriate for the hazard. 10.602 INCLUDE LABELING FOR FIRE DOORS, ELECTRICAL ROOMS, MECHANICAL ROOMS, STAIRS, ETC. The request to include a requirement to label doors is intended to assist fire fighters in locating specific fire related equipment located in rooms behind locked doors. This requirement also helps to alert fire fighters to potential hazards that may be in a room but are not designated on the door. 11.403 INCLUDE SNOW AND ICE PROTECTION - The code requires natural gas meters be protected from vehicular traffic but does not currently require protection from snow and ice. The Fire Department receives approximately 16 - 24 calls each winter for natural gas smells caused by gas meters broken by falling ice or from snow blocking pressure relief valves on gas meters. This request was endorsed by Public Service Company and has full support from the fire fighters. ARTICLE 25 INCLUDE PROHIBITION OF FESTIVAL SEATING - This issue is new to the codes. Recent incidents at concerts across the country have resulted in serious injury and fatalities where "festival seating" was allowed. Festival seating is the practice of selling "standing room only" at concerts and is usually designated to be between the front row of seats and the stage. The injuries and fatalities have occurred when pushing and shoving start, resulting in a surge towards the stage. People have been crushed, trampled, suffocated, and fractures have occurred. Several municipalities across the county have banned the practice of allowing festival seating as a result of the serious injuries and fatalities. ! .3 - - R'~C~ JtJE 1 9199 IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Case No . 91 CV 3z SUMMONS TYROL COR?., LTD., and - RENATO IBARRA, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF VAIL; TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; - KLNT ROSE, THOMAS STEINBERG, LYN FRITZLEN, JAMES GIBBON, MERVYN LAPIN, ROBERT LEVINE and PEGGY OSTERFOSS AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; and GALE NORTON AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Defendants. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS, GREETINGS: You are hereby summoned and required to file with the Clerk of tris Court an answer or other response to the attached Co:~plaint. If service of this Summons and Complaint was made upon you within the State of Colorado, you are required to file your answer within 20 days after service upon you. If service of the Summons and Complaint was made upon you outside the State of Colorado, you ~.re required to file your answer to the Complaint i. within 30 days after such service upon you. { If 'you fail to file your answer or other response to the Complaint in writing within the applicable time period, I I t judgment by default may be entered against you by the Court for the relief demanded in said Complaint without further notice. The following documents are also served herewith: Complaint Motion Pursuant to Rule 106(a)(4)(III) Order ~ / DATED the ~ day of July, 91. D ~ CO RIFF, D _ LAN P ~ By. ~ Arthur A. Abplanalp', Jr., No 138 John W. Dunn, No.~l 108 S. r^rontage Rd. #300 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7552 Attorneys for Plaintiffs b IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Case No. 91 CV 3~i0 COMPL.~INT TYROL CORP., LTD., and RENATO IBARRA, Plaintiffs, . v. TOWN OF VAIL; TOWN CGUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; KENT ROSE, THOMAS STEINBERG, LYN FRITZLEN, JAMES GIBBON, MERVYN LAPIN, ROBERT LEVINE and PEGGY OSTERFOSS AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; and , GALE NORTON AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ` Defendants. COME NOW the Plaintiffs by their attorneys, Cosgriff, Dunn & Abplanalp, and as a complaint against Defendants state: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiff Tyrol Corp., Ltd., is a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Colorado, and Plaintiff Renato Ibarra is president of Tyrol Corp., Ltd., and acts as agent for Ty~ol,Corp., Ltd., at all times relevant hereto.- 2.;~.Plaintiff Tyrol Corp., Ltd., is the owner of residential real property located in the Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, described as Lot 1, Block 3, Vail Village Third Filing ("the real property"). Plaintiff Renato Ibarra is a principal individual occupant of the real property, with the authority and permission of Plaintiff Tyrol Corp., Ltd. 3. On or about the 12th day of September, 1989, the Plaintiffs requested that the Defendant, Town of Vail ("the Town") issue a construction permit for the installation of electrical condui~ in trenches to be constructed on the real property. 4. On or about the 13th day of September, 1989, the Town issued its construction permit for the installation of electrical conduit in trenches to be constructed on the real property. A copy of said construction permit is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 5. On or about the 13th day of September, 1989, the Town's electrical inspector inspected the trenching which was the subject of the construction permit referred to above and issued the inspection report constituting approval of the work done, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 6. Between September, 1989 and June, 1990 Plaintiffs, in reliance upon the construction permit and inspection report issued by the Town, proceeded to construct and install a landscape-lighting system on the real property. On or about the 14th day of June, 1990, the Town's electrical inspector inspected the lighting system which had been installed on the real property and issued an inspection report, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C," constituting final approval of the landscape- lighting system. 7. On or about the 10th day of December, 1990, Plaintiffs received from the Town a communication demanding that the landscape-lighting system be brought into conformity with the Design Review guidelines of the Town notwithstanding the approvals described above. 8. On or about the 5th day of April, 1991, Plaintiffs in compliance with the Town's request-submitted an application for Design Review approval of the landscape-lighting system installed on the real property.' 9. On the 1st of May, 1991, the Town's Design Review. Board denied said application. 10:, On the 10th day of May, 1991, the Plaintiffs . appealed the, decision of the Design Review Board to the Defendant, the Town Council of the Town of Vail ("the Council"). A copy of the Notice of Appeal is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 11. On the 18th day of June, 1991, the Council affirmed the decision of the Design Review Board. I~ I FIRST CLAIM RULE 106 REVIEW 12. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 11 are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 13. The Council has exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its discretion, and there is no plain, speedy and adequate remedy otherwise provided by law. SECOND CLAIM DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 14. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby incorporated by reference. 15. Plaintiffs' rights are affected by the Design Review regulations contained in Chapter 18.54 of the Municipal Code of the Town, including but not limited to Section 18.54.050 ("the Ordinance"), both generally and as applied to landscape- lightirg systems, and is entitled to have determined any question of construction or validity arising under said ordinance. 16. The Ordinance contains no adequate standards for the review of applications and on its face, or as it has been _ applied to Plaintiffs, is in violation of the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Constitution of the United States of America. THIRD CLAIM PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL 17. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 11 are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 18. Plaintiffs expended approximately $27,000 in the installation of the landscape-lighting system in reliance upon the construction permit, the inspection approval and the construction; approval, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits A, $ and C. 19. The Town is estopped from denying the approval of the landscape lighting-system and from interfering with Plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of the landscape-lighting system. FOURTH CLAIM FOR AN INJUNCTION Z0. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 11 are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 21. Upon information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, the Town will take steps to enforce the decision of the Council and to compel Plainti~fs to re:r:ove the landscape- lighting system before this Court is given the opportunity to review that decision. 22. If the Town is not enjoined from enforcing the Council's decision, Plaintiffs will suffer immediate and irreparable harm in that, if the landscape-lighting system is " removed, Plaintiffs' claims herein will be caused to be moot. FIFTH CLAIM 42 USC 1983 23. The allegations of paragraphs 1 through 11 are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 24. The actions of the Town were taken pursuant to color of state law and constituted a denial of the rights of equal protection and due process guaranteed to the Plaintiffs, and, if the decision of the Council is found to be valid by this Court, will constitute a regulatory taking of the property of the Plaintiffs without compensation. Such activities by the Town constitute violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as a result of which Plaintiffs suffered, and are entitled to the recovery of, damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray as follows: _ " 1. That this Court review the decision of the Council pursuant to Rule 106(a)(4), C.R.C.P. and determine that the Council has exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its discretion. 2.t. I,n the alternative, that this Court enter an order pursuant to Rule 57, C.R.C.P., determining that the Ordinance is unconstitutional on its face or as it has been applied to the " Plaintiffs or that the Ordinance has no application to the Plaintiffs. 3. In the alternative, that this court determine that the Town is estopped to enforce the decision of the Council and to compel the removal of the landscape-lighting system. 4. That this court enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs and against the Town for the amount in which it has been damaged as a consequence the denial of the rights of due process and equal protection, and of the regulatory taking of the property of the Plaintiffs, which amount will be shown upon trial. 5. That the Court enter a temporary restraining order and an injunction, pendente lite, and upon trial hereof, restraining and enjoining the Town from enforcing the decision of the Council pending entry of final judgment herein. 6. For its costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee, pursuant to 42 U~.1S`L . ~ 1988. DATED the X02 day of July, C GRIFF, D & BP P g L~ i Arthur A. Abplanalp Jr., No. 138 John W. Dunn, No. 421 108 S.'Frontage Rd. #300 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7552 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Plaintiffs' address: Av. de las Palmas No. 555-501 Col. Lomas de Chapultepec Mexico,' D.F. 11000 Republic of Mexico t CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ~ ""'--`'"C1' r`rcnmt rt,•o~n=rr vrv~voarrc ~ nATEv ,r~ PERMIT N0. n 1.TYPEOFCO)T5T ucE~ TION t ff ffr Iv v . 1 Un U tail ~y ~ depo.:..rent o1 community development 2000UPANCYCROUP A e E H t R 61 BUILDING ~ DIVISION 1 2 2a 3 4 o ELECTRICAL i~3 r Q a Q TO REFILLED OLfTCOMPLETELYPRIORTOISSUANCEOFPEAMt GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK • ~ < PLUMBING TYPE OF PERMIT ~ ~,I ~n-~- hr ~n i n~ UILDING ? PLUMBING t~~l•o_,•n~. ~ faECHANICJU.I r~ ,ELECTRICAL ? FOUNDATION Ct J ? MECHANICAL ? NPE CROUP G.R.FA VALUATION . PERMIT FEES • LEGAL LOT ~ 8LK BUILDING PERf.ItT DESC. FILING: • ~C~ _ PLU+cHECx J08 NAME: _ h~(.Secpe ELECTRtra?t. ~ ~ u' ~ OYrNER j{AMF T,~jj~~„C n t1EW ( ) ALTERATION ( ) ADDITIONAL ()U REPAIR ) PLUMBING • ' l ~(~pnRFS.S 3 ~~~v r:/n,l~~.,r~~ nwEilrNG uNrTS Acco~a+oaAT1oN tmrrs MECf UW tcu I CITY\j ~ j ~ P41~~y"' /6 NEJGHTtNFT. NO.FIRETLACES ~ RECREATION FEE ARCHITECT FIRMr `MGM l~'G'~51Gi~ f~J }^L~1'Cni,1 INSULATION; TYPE THICKNESS R-VALtUE OESIGNREVtEwBOARD ~ H ~7 H ~Ij•~OQRFtS~OSG. Z C~r~_ ~~R CLEJItI•UPDEPOSIT + _ ~ ~ CITY" ~ p}T•q~~"~~ ~T• WALLS I USE TAX 1 W ROOF I GENERAL FIRM TYPE eLac. CAS TOTAL PERMIT FEE l w~ CONTRACTOR TOWN OF VAIL AEG. NO. OF ~7 I ~ ~ soLAR wood TELE HEAT , ~ Q, / 2 ~x G~ _ ,J,`~~~ I P<' p ADDITIONAL PERMITS NEEDED: II.DINC OFFICIAL ~ DATE U ELECTRICAL i _ _ Y N INITIAL - TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO. 1-~?~ ~ - - - - - - - CONTRACTOR ~f ST. CUT ONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE TELE l~ 9__7 ~ 1 afAST1NG 20N1NG b BUILDING NOTF~• FIRM PMKING PLUtiBING TOWN OF VAIL REG. NO. CONTRACTOR DELrO I TELE. . FIRM I hereby acknowledge that I have read thls application, tilled out In full the Information required, MECHANICAL completed an accurate plot plan, and state that all the information provided as required is correct TowN OF vAIL REG. No. agree to comply with the Information and plot plan, to comply with all Town ordinances and state CONTRACTOR laws, and to build this structure according to the Town's zoning and subdivision codes, design • _ TELE• _ review approved. Uniform Building Code and older ordinances of the Town applicable thereto. OTHER FIRM TOWt! OF VAIL RED. NO. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACTOR FOR NIMSElF 111 . _ AND THE OWNER. • I(VSPECTtON REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER OF PROJECT ~ TOWN OF VAIL. ~ _ DATE n J08 NAME~~ ~ ~ ~CF~ CALLER READY FOR INSPECTIOON: ~ MON TUES'~ WED THUR FRI `AM~PM LOCATION: ~Z"> ~ ~ ~\\')~Q .C~'\~'~ • BUILDING: PLUMBING: ? FOOTINGS /STEEL ? UNDERGROUND ? FOUNDATION /STEEL ~ ~ ? ROUGH / D.W.V. ? FRAMING ? ROUGH /WATER ' ROOF & SHEER ? GAS PIPING ~ PLYWOOD NAILING ? INSULATION ? POOL / H. TUB ? SHEETROCK NAIL ~ ? ? ? ? FINAL ? FINAL ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: . ? .TEMP. POWER ? HEATING ? ROUGH ? EXHAUST HOODS ~ • ? CONDUIT ~ ? SUPPLY AIR ~ ~ ~ ' - ? ? ' i~ FINAL rS~'nC ~ ~~~n~. ~ ? FINAL ?•APPROVED ? DISAPPROVED ~ ? REINSPECTION REQUIRED - - CORRECTIONS: . ~ _ . t . 'EXHIBIT "B" r r.eTC ~ ~ • .•iN'. . ~ ' 1 ~v`~1~ INSPECTION REQUEST "'--PERMIT NUrrM ((ER OF PROJECT TOWN OF VAIL ~ ' DATE- CALLER _ READY FOR INSPECTION: MON TUES WED U ~ FRI ~ AM PM .LOCATION: ~~1 • ~ , • BUILDING: PLUMBING: ? FOOTIN.GS /STEEL ? UNDERGROUND ? FOUNDATION /STEEL ~ ? ROUGH / D.W.V. ? FRAMING ? ROUGH /WATER • ROOF & SHEER ? GAS PIPING ? PLYWOOD NAILING O INSULATION ? POOL / H. TUB ? SHEETROCK NAIL ? ? ? ? FINAL ? FINAL ELECTRICAL: .;-MECHANICAL: ? TEMP. POWER ~ ? HEATING ? ROUGH l~::EXHAUST HOODS ? .CONDUIT ? SUPPLY AIR . ? FINAL ? FINAL APPROVED / ,?~JDISAPPROVED _ - ? REINSPECTION ,REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: L~Cc.~C1 ~~/J~ C~,^ ..c~ ~/J ~ ~ , r n_ n I ~--r l . . ~ r • •r EXHIBIT "C" ~ ~ ~ ~ DATE 'INSPECTOR i ~ IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Case No. 91 CV MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 106(a)(4)(III) TYROL CORP., LTD., and RENATO _TBARRA, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF VAIL; TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; KENT ROSE, THOMAS STEINBERG, LYN FRITZLEN, JP.MES GIBBON, MERVYN LAPIN, ROBERT LEVINE and PEGGY OSTER:'OSS AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; and GALE NORTON AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Defendants. COME NOW the Plaintiffs by their attorneys, Cosgriff, Dunn & Abplanalp, and move pursuant to Rule 106(a)(4)(III) for an order to the Defendant, Town of Vail,~requirinq certification of the record of the hearing before•the Defendant, Town Council, on June 18, 1991, pertaining to the application. of t P iff. DATED the ~v? d~y of Jul , 1991. CO RIFF, D & AB's ALP t BY Arthur A. Abplanalp,' r., No 213 John W. Dunn, No. 1 108 S. Frontage R #300 Vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-7552 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ('r~ IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE Or COLORADO Case No. 91 CV ORDER TYROL CORP., LTD., and RENATO IBARRA, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF VAIL; TOWN COUNCIL OF TiiE TOWN OF VAIL; KENT ROSE, THOMAS STEINBERG, LYN FRITZLEN, JAMES GIBBON, MERVYN LAPIN, FeOBERT LEVINE and PEGGY OSTERFOSS AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; and GALE NORTON AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Defendants. ON MOTION OF THE PLAINTIFFS `pursuant to Rule 1Q~6(a)(4)(III), C.R.C.P., it is ordered that the Defendant, Town of ail, shall file with the clerk of this Court on or before the _ 30 day of August, 1991, the record of the hearing before the Defendant, Town Council of the Town of Va.il,.on June 18. 1991, pertaining to the application of the Plaintiffs. DONE the ISM day of July, 1991. BY THE COURT District Judge