Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991-08-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
~i~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1991 1:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Site Visit: Stanley Duplex (1816 Sunburst Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley Third Filing) 2. Site Visit: Breeze Ski Rentals (Montaneros Commercial Condominium, Unit 100/641 N. Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Third Filing) 3. Review of 1991 Resident Survey 4. Review of 1991 Council Goals/Objectives 5. Proposed 1992 Capital Improvement Projects 6. Information Update 7. Other 8. Executive Session: Negotiations and Legal Matters Related to Litigation 9. Adjournment C1ACaEND0.W5 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1991 1:00 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 p.m. 1. Site Visit: Stanley Duplex (re: site coverage decision) (1816 Jill Kammerer Sunburst Drive/Lot 1, Vail Valley Third Filing) Action Reauested of Council: Prepare to discuss appeal (at 8/6/91 evening meeting) of PEC decision regarding whether or not the area under a deck counts toward the site coverage of a lot 1:30 p.m. 2. Site Visit: Breeze Ski Rentals {re: sign variance) Jill Kammerer (Montaneros Commercial Condominium, Unit 100/641 N. Lionshead Circle/Part of Lot 8, Block 1, Vail Lionshead Third Filing) The sign variance request is to increase the number of allowable signs by one (1), and to increase the area of signage on the building in excess of the signage area allowed by 2.25 sq. ft. Action Requested of Council: All sign variance requests are reviewed by Town Council following DRB review. The action requested of Council is to approve or deny the sign variance request. Background Rationale: On 1/16/91, the DRB determined the business faces onto one major pedestrian way. On 4/17/91, the DRB reviewed the applicant's sign variance request. Following discussion, the applicant's representative requested the variance request be tabled. On 6/19/91, the DRB again reviewed the pedestrian frontage issue and upheld their 1/16/91 decision that the business fronts onto one major pedestrian way. On 7/17/91, the DRB voted to deny the requested sign variance. The vote to deny was passed, 3-1. Voting in favor of the motion to deny were George Lamb, Ned Gwathmey, and Chuck Crist. Sherry Dorward voted against the motion for the following reasons: A) signage needs in Lionshead are different than in the village, B) signage can be an amenity and need not necessarily be considered a negative and therefore does not necessarily need to be minimized. 2:00 p.m. 3. Review of 1991 Resident Survey - Caroline Fisher The 1991 Resident Survey was sent out to approximately 1,000 local residents and merchants, and 200 owners of vacation properties in Vail. To date, the Town has received 238 completed surveys for a response rate of 23.8%. Action Reauested of Council: Review of the results of this year's survey, which cover resident viewpoints on neighborhood problems, service quality, service quantity, capital project priorities, and more. 2:15 p.m. 4. Review of 1991 Council Goals/Objectives - Pam Brandmeyer Action Reauested of Council: A quick synopsis of Council goals and objectives for the current year as established by Council in February of '91; how we are doing and what we've accomplished so far this year. Staff Recommendation: Please review; for information update only. 2:25 p.m. 5. Proposed 1992 Capital Improvement Projects - Steve Barwick Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and other proposed projects for 1992 will be presented. Action Requested of Council: Review the proposed capital projects and make changes as desired. 3:10 p.m. 6. Information Update 3:25 p.m. 7. Other 3:40 p.m. 8. Executive Session - Larry Eskwith Negotiations and legal matters related to litigation 9. Adjournment C:VIGENDA.WSE FiL~ C'u~ y TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Yai~ Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 MEMORANDUM T0: Ron Phillips FROM: Caroline Fisher DATE: August 5, 1991 RE: 1991 Resident Survey Results . In order to facilitate understanding of the 1991 Town of Vail Resident Survey results, the following are included in this memo: 1) demographic information (page 1) 2) summary narrative (pages 2-4) 3) detailed listing of responses to each question (pages 5-15} 4) written comments The 1991 Town of Vail Resident Survey was sent to approximately 1,000 locals and business owners, and 200 owners of vacation property in Vail. To date, the Town has received 238 completed surveys for a response rate of 23.8%. Respondents include: 191 full time Vail residents; 8 seasonal Vail residents; 30 owners of vacation property; 1non-resident, owner of commercial property. Neighborhoods from which local responses were derived include: Intermountain - 29 Matterhorn - 25 West Vail (north of I-70) - 27 Buffehr Creek, Lionsridge, the Valley - 14 Potato Patch, Sandstone - 19 Lionshead - 6 Vail Village - 24 Golf Course - 11 Booth Falls and Bald Mountain Road areas - 8 East Vail (Bighorn) - 51 1 SUMMARY NARRATIVE i NEIGHBORHOOD PROBLEMS Neighborhood problems were rated on a scale of 1-5, with 5 representing "Extreme Problem", and 1, "Not a Problem". The top five neighborhood problems named in the survey were: 1) Speeding or reckless automobiles -Neighborhood Roads (2.39) 2) Pollution from road dust (2.36) 3) Speeding or reckless automobiles -Frontage Roads (2.32) 4) Animals (running at large, barking, etc.) {2.22) 5) Street disrepair (2.21) These items compare with 1990 survey results which listed the following as top neighborhood problems: Street disrepair (2.06); Naise from I-70 (1.99); Animals (running at large, etc.) (1.93); Speeding or reckless automobiles -Frontage Roads (1.93); Unsafe walking routes (1.87). . NOTE: While some of the 1991 ratings of neighborhood problems increased over 1990 ratings, it is important to note that the proportion of "local"' responses to "out of town" responses was far greater this year than last. 1991's survey had 191 local responses, with 39 responses from seasonal residents and owners of vacation property. 1990's survey had 365 responses from full time Uail residents, with 943 responses from seasonal residents and owners of vacation property. SERVICE DUALITY The quality of Town of Vail services was rated on a scale of 1-5, with 5 representing "Excellent". The following Town services were rated highest: 1) Fire Department response time -Emergency (4. i 8) 2) Snow removal and sanding of streets (4.16) 3) Bus system -Shuttle route (4.04) - 4) Bus system -Sandstone route (3.95) 5) Maintaining of park areas (3.94) These service areas received top ratings in last year's survey, as well. Town services receiving the lowest ratings in the 1990 survey include: • Design Review Board (2.54) - • Building Plan Review (2.65) • Planning and Environmental Commission (2.80) • Town Council (2.87) • Traffic Control -Neighborhood Roads (2.97) 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS A different approach was taken this year than in past survey years with regard to capital project priorities. Too often, in past years, every capital project presented received a "very important" rating. This year, the respondent was asked to prioritize various capital projects in a 1-14 listing, with 1 being that project which is considered of greatest importance. Through this approach, we were hoping to receive specific input and direction for future planning. Hopefully, this promoted the understanding that municipal funds are limited and, while many projects are worthy, finances are limited and priorities must be established. The top rated capital projects in the 1991 survey (listed in order of preference) were: 1) Affordable housing directed by Vail's Housing Authority within Town of Vail limits (5.40) 2) Completion of recreation path from West Vail to Highways 6 and 24 (through Dowd Junction) (5.61) 3) Tree and shrub planting along highways for landscaping and screening purposes (6.16) 4) Acquisition of additiona{ open space or land for public uses in Vail (6.43) 5) Additional pedestrian overpass in West Vail in Cascade Village/Timber Ridge/New Post Office area (7.26) Construction of Dowd Junction recreation path, purchase of additional open space in Vail, and landscaping of highways ranked among the highest rated priorities on last year's survey, as well. GENERAL QUESTIONS The importance of numerous general programs was rated on scale of 1-5 with 1 representing "Very Important" and 5 "Very Unimportant". - The following were given "Important" or near "Important" ratings: 1) Implementation of further measures to improve water quality in creek areas (4.34) 2) Implementation of mandatory smoking restrictions for public places in Vail (3.98) 3) Implementation of a mandatory recycling program in Vail (3.77) 4) Town of Vail support for bus service to Avon (3.65) 5) Town of Vail support for bus service to Eagle-Vail (3.63) The item receiving the lowest rating among respondents was an increase in property tax, or some alternative tax, to support the construction of a new Police Department facility (2.14). 3 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN - Respondents were asked to give input on various proposals presented in the Vail Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Ratings were given on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 representing "Very Important" and 5, "Very Unimportant". The following proposals were rated as highest priorities: 1) Completion of an off-street recreation path from East Vail to Dowd Junction (4.03) 2) Improvement of the West Vail interchange to provide for better traffic maneuverability (3.81) 3) Providing of six foot paved shoulders along both sides of each frontage road for bicycles (3.72) 4) Elimination of truck parking on Bridge Street (3.39) 5) Restructuring of the West Vail bus routes to provide Gross circulation between the north and south sides of I-70 (3.34) Items receiving the lowest rating of importance among the Transportation Plan proposals were: • Modification of I-70 access by closing westbound off-ramp and eastbound on-ramp during peak periods (1.83) • Providing of new on and off ramps for eastbound traffic at the Booth Falls underpass near Aspen Lane (2.33) • Acquisition of a new bus fleet for the In-Town Shuttle to increase efficiency (lower floors, wider doors, standing room) (2.39) 4 RANK ORDERING OF RESPONSES - 1 TO WHAT DEGREE ARE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS A PROBLEM IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? EXTREME MAJOR IMPORTANT MINOR NOT A PROBLEM PROBLEM PROBLEM PROBLEM PROBLEM 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 1 Congested on-street parking 1.83 1.86 1.94 2 Trash/litter/abandoned vehicles 1.81 1.66 2.27 and property 3 Animals (running at large, 2.22 1.93 2.41 barking, etc.) 4 Street disrepair 2.21 2.06 2.95 5 Lack of recreational facilities 1.86 1.55 2.05 6 Signs (street names, regulatory, 1.63 warning) 7 Unsafe walking routes 1.94 1.87 2.43 8 Street lighting 1.83 9 Speeding or reckless 2.32 1.93 2.47 automobiles -Frontage roads 10 Speeding or reckless automobiles - Neighborhood roads 2.39 1.84 2.47 11 Crime against persons or property 1.70 1.59 i .61 12 Neighborhood noise 1.56 1.66 1.60 13 Overhead utilities 1.65 1.50 N/A 14 Pollution from wood smoke 2.01 15 Pollution from road dust 2.36 5 2 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF THE FOLLOWING TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES? EXCELLENT GOOD ADEQUATE POOR BAD 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 1 Snow removal and sanding of streets 4.16 4.14 4.11 2 Snow removal and sanding of 3.82 sidewalks and public stairways 3 Street repair 3.04 3.27 2.73 4 Street sweeping: Summer season for 3.40 street cleaning purposes 5 Street sweeping: Winter season for 3.00 air quality purposes 6 Street lighting 3.14 3.10 2.59 7 Cleaning of commercial core areas 3.56 3.70 3.61 8 Maintaining of park areas 3.94 9 Cleaning of park areas 3.82 10 Neighborhood police patrols 3.16 3.18 3.33 11 Business area police patrols 3.41 3.40 3.50 12 Traffic law enforcement - 3.10 3.24 3.13 Frontage roads 13 Traffic control - 2.97 3.06 2.88 Neighborhood roads 14 Traffic control - 4-way 3.14 3.15 3.34 15 Enforcement of parking regulations: 3.03 Neighborhoods 16 Enforcement of loading areas and 3.03 times: Village core 17 Response time of Vail police 3.66 3.62 N/A officers to calls for assistance 18 Crime prevention programs 3.36 3.24 3.49 19 Police investigations 3.20 3.24 3.19 20 Animal Control 3.01 2.77 2.77 21 Sign code enforcement 3.12 22 Municipal Court 3.63 3.58 3.63 23 Fire prevention education 3.46 3.35 3.44 24 Fire suppression/emergency medical 3.83 3.81 25 Fire Department response time: 4.18 Emergency 26 Fire Department response time: 3.89 Non-emergency 6 2 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF THE FOLLOWING TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES? (CONTINUED) 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 27 Building plan review 2.65 2.77 2.85 28 Building inspections 3.05 3.07 3.02 29 Bus system -shuttle route 4.04 4.11 4.03 30 Bus system -Sandstone route 3.95 3.89 3.80 31 Bus system -East Vail route 3.92 3.70 3.68 32 Bus system -West Vail routes 3.64 3.72 3.61 33 Library hours 3.74 34 Selection of Library books available 3.66 3.56 3.60 35 Selection of library video and 3.52 3.27 3.35 audio cassettes available 36 Library adult programs offered 3.84 37 Library children's story hours 3.85 38 Community Room offerings 3.69 39 Planning and Environmental 2.80 2.81 2.94 Commission 40 Design Review Board 2.54 2.68 2.76 41 Local Licensing Authority 3.28 (Liquor) 42 Town Council 2.87 3.09 2.88 43 Town Administration 3.05 7 2 ~ HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUANTITY OF THE FOLLOWING TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES? FAR TOO MUCH TOO MUCH ADEQUATE TO0 LITTLE FAR TOO LITTLE 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 1 Snow removal and sanding of streets 3.00 4.14 4.11 2 Snow removal and sanding of 2.88 sidewalks and public stairways 3 Street repair 2.54 3.27 2.73 4 Street sweeping: Summer season for 2.81 street cleaning purposes 5 Street sweeping: Winter season for 2.64 air quality purposes 6 Street lighting 2.72 3.10 2.59 7 Cleaning of commercial core areas 2.87 3.70 3.61 8 Maintaining of park areas 3.01 . 9 Cleaning of park areas 3.00 10 Neighborhood police patrols 2.64 3.18 3.33 11 Business area police patrols 2.93 3.40 3.50 12 Traffic law enforcement - 2.83 3.24 3.13 Frontage roads 13 Traffic control - 2.58 3.06 2.88 Neighborhood roads 14 Traffic control - 4-way 2.75 3.15 3.34 15 Enforcement of parking regulations: 2.87 Neighborhoods 16 Enforcement of loading areas and 2.91 " - times: Village core 17 Response time of Vail police 2.95 3.62 N/A officers to calls for assistance 18 Crime prevention programs 2.85 3.24 3.49 19 Police investigations 2.81 3.24 3.19 20 Anima! Control 2.65 2..77 2.77 21 Sign code enforcement 3.06 22 Municipal Court NOT APPLICABLE 23 Fire prevention education 2.80 24 Fire suppression/emergency medical 3.09 3.83 3.81 25 Fire Department response time: 3.12 Emergency 26 Fire Department response time: 3.07 " Non-emergency 8 2 'HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUANTITY OF THE FOLLOWING TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES? (CONTINUED) 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 27 Building plan review 2.99 2.77 2.85 28 Building inspections 2.91 3.07 3.02 29 Bus system -shuttle route 2.86 4.11 4.03 30 Bus system -Sandstone route 2.86 3.89 3.80 31 Bus system -East Vail route 2.68 3.70 3.68 32 Bus system -West Vail routes 2.60 3.72 3.61 33 Library hours 2.89 34 Selection of Library books available 2.73 3.56 3.60 35 Selection of library video and 2.81 3.27 3.35 audio cassettes available 36 Library adult programs offered 2.89 37 Library children's story hours 2.90 38 Community Room offerings 2.97 39 Planning and Environmental 2.86 2.81 2.94 Commission 40 Design Review Board 2.94 2.68 2.76 41 Local Licensing Authority 2.98 (Liquor) 42 Town Council 2.90 3.09 2.88 43 Town Administration 3.05 9 3 HOW IMPORTANT TO YOU ARE THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR USE OF - THE TOWN'S TAX DOLLARS? Each respondent was asked to prioritize the following capital projects in a 1-14 listing, with 1 representing the project which is considered of highest importance. 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 1 Conference and performance center 7.64 2 Affordable housing directed by 5.40 Vail's Housing Authority within Town of Vail limits 3 Tree and shrub planting along highways for 6.16 3.98 landscaping and screening purposes 4 Maintaining the 105 acres of Berry Creek 8.75 property in Town of Vail ownership for recreation and housing purposes 5 Acquisition of additional open space 6.43 3.65 or land for public uses in Vail 6 Enhancement of connection between Vail 7.78 Village and Lionshead along Meadow Drive 7 Completion of Donovan Park 7.70 8 Landscaping at I-70 interchanges 7.96 3.73 9 Revegetation of all road cuts 8.14 3.94 10 Completion of recreation path from 5.61 3.62 West Vail to Highways 6 and 24 (through Dowd Junction) 11 Completion of recreation path from Golden 8.93 3.65 - Peak to Ford Amphitheater, adjacent to roadway 2 Additional pedestrian overpass in West 7.26 3.18 Vail in Cascade Village/Timber Ridge/new Post Office area 13 Development of low impact pedestrian 8.49 3.30 path along Gore Creek connecting Ford Park with Lionshead 14 New underpass between Main Vail and 7.79 West Vail interchanges, connecting North and South Frontage Roads 10 4 GENERAL QUESTIONS VERY VERY IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NEUTRAL UNIMPORTANT UNIMPORTANT 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE How important do you consider the Town of Vail's continued support of bus service to: 1 Eagle-Vail 3.63 2 Avon 3.65 . 3 Edwards 3.38 4 Minturn 3.49 5 How important is a sales tax increase 2.92 of up to .5% to support regional bus service 6 How important is an increase in property 2.14 tax, or some alternative tax, to support the construction of a new Police Department facility 7 The Vail Town Council recently banned 3.18 woodburning fireplaces and stoves in newly constructed units within Town limits. A program was also initiated to encourage voluntary conversion to gas fireplaces, appliances, and stoves, with the program evaluated after two years. How important do you consider implementation of further restrictions on fireplaces and woodburning stoves in Vail air quality purposes 8 A voluntary Valleywide recycling program, 3.77 supported in part with Town of Vail funds, has been implemented. How important do you consider implementation of a mandatory recycling program in Vail 11 4 GENERAL QUESTIONS (CONTINUED) 9 How important do you consider implementation 3.98 of mandatory smoking restrictions for public places in Vail 10 How important do you consider implementation 4.34 of further measures to improve water quality in creek areas 12 5 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN VERY VERY IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NEUTRAL UNIMPORTANT UNIMPORTANT 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 1 Restructure the West Vail routes 3.34 to provide cross circulation between the north and south sides of I-70 2 Acquire a new bus fleet for the 2.39 In-town Shuttle to increase efficiency. New buses would have lower floors, wider doors, and the possibility of allowing the passenger to carry skis on board if it can be done safely 3 In the long term acquire Vail 2.87 Associates' West Day Lot for a small two-story parking structure 4 Preserve the east end of Ford Park 2.86 for a small two-story parking structure, not higher than the existing lot 5 Eliminate truck parking on Bridge Street 3.39 6 Eliminate truck parking on Gore Creek Drive 3.17 from Checkpoint Charlie to Mill Creek 7 Convert all 15 minute parking areas in 2.57 Vail to truck loading zones 8 Provide parking spaces for delivery 2.64 trucks over Mill Creek between Cyranos and the Christiania to eliminate parking on Hanson Ranch Road 9 Develop a centralized loading area beneath 2.71 the Christiania parking lot to eliminate all on-street parking in the east Vail Village area. The centralized loading area may or may not provide storage units for individual businesses 13 5 ~ COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CONTINUED) VERY VERY IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NEUTRAL UNIMPORTANT UNIMPORTANT 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 10 Develop another underground central 2.72 loading lot, located south of the Lodge at Vail, to eliminate all on-street parking in the west Vail Village area 11 Modify I-70 access by closing the 1.83 westbound off-ramp and eastbound on-ramp during peak periods at the main Vail interchange (December-March), allowing vehicles from Denver to use the East Vail exit exclusively 12 Provide new on and off ramps for 2.33 eastbound traffic at the Booth Falls underpass near Aspen Lane 13 Improve the West Vail interchange to 3.81 provide for better traffic maneuverability 14 Provide new on and off ramps for 2.56 eastbound I-70 near the Vail Associates shops 15 Provide avehicular/pedestrian 3.25 underpass connecting the North and South Frontage Roads just west of Simba Run 16 Provide turn lanes on the frontage 2.89 roads for left and right turning vehicles along key roadway stretches and intersections. Where left turn lanes are not required, the center area would be landscaped 17 Provide six foot paved shoulders 3.72 along both sides of each frontage road for bicycles 14 5 . COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CONTINUED) VERY VERY IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NEUTRAL UNIMPORTANT UNIMPORTANT 5 4 3 2 1 1991 1990 1989 RANK AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE ORDER RESPONSE RESPONSE RESPONSE 18 Completion of an off-street recreation 4.03 path from East Vail to Dowd Junction Respondents were asked to rate the importance of the following stretches of recreation path: 19 Intermountain to Dowd Junction 4.13 recreation path 20 Stephen's Park to Donovan Park 3.11 recreation path 21 Library to Vail Village 2.94 recreation path 22 Gold Peak to Katsos Ranch 2.95 recreation path 23 East Vail Interchange to Gore 2.99 Creek Campground recreation path is COMMENTS FROM THE 1991 VAIL RESIDENT SURVEY 1 TO WHAT DEGREE ARE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS A PROBLEM IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? 1-1 Congested on-street pazking When people hike the Bighorn Trail, pazking is a problem -there's no enforcement of Town regulations. (Important problem) should be able to park in front of own home. Ticketing in residential azeas improved in 1990-91. NO on street pazking. Why is construction worker parking enforced at some locations and not at all at others (i.e., the Ross Perot house)? 1-2 Trash/litter/abandoned vehicles and property No enforcement. I believe we have an environmental office that we pay for (Susan Scanlan?). Please give her directions to the Matterhorn area. I am disgusted with having to pick up litter and garbage on the street continually because my neighbors do not have legal TOV garbage containers. ENFORCE THE RULES PLEASE! The lot under my house is used as a junk yard for cars, lumber, and heavy equipment, for a neighbor whose house is not on the same side of the street, and the yard is an eye sore. Why can't people put tops on garbage cans, so animals and birds don't get into it. Absentee owner leaves trash bags to bird to enjoy... Cars that remain unmoved -year round! 1-3 Animals (running at large, barking, etc.) No enforcement. Has improved drastically! The animal control officer is an outstanding member of your staff. He has the perfect personality and attitude. We appreciate his efforts. Mostly neighbors letting dogs out to run. Leash law not obeyed. Always dogs on the loose. Dogs remain a big problem in East Vail. 1-4 Street disrepair (potholes, cracks, etc.) The potholes are not taken care of in winter. Lionshead to Vail by hospital. Buffher Creek Road, going up to Lionsridge Loop or the valley. With the speed bump at bottom causes you to slow down almost to a stop and then allowing you to not make the hill. Streets are in very poor condition. East Vail must have better street cleaning and repair. s 1-5 Lack of recreational facilities (bike paths, parks, etc.) The "Donovan Dump" is not even the start of a park area and the natural beauty has been destroyed. West Vail biking path needs extended. We have lots of children in the neighborhood, and no park within walking distance. Bike path west to Avon is needed. 1-6 Signs (street names, regulatory, warning) Too many signs. There are TOO MANY signs, particularly "No Parking". Why do we have those signs every 30 feet or so? Why not just one in each area? Sign at corner of Booth Falls Road and west entrance to Vail Mountain School are congested and unsightly. Bring horizontal signs to East Vail, and everywhere! Directional signage in East Vail would eliminate much confusion. Yield sign at bottom of Valley View Drive and Lionsridge Loop. Can you consider a stop sign (very dangerous!) I am delighted at real street signs in the Village. TOV removed a "children" warning sing for constructing and faced it the wrong direction when replacing it. Numerous calls last year to Stan Berryman s office went unheeded. The street signs that are vertical posts with carved street names are impossible to understand. People cannot figure out which street is which. New street signs are great! y J 1-7 Unsafe walking routes Meadow Drive between hospital and ski museum is quite unsafe. Sidewalks or alpine footpaths would make walking safer in West Vail hillside area. Streets could be widened for walking (especially with strollers for children and bikes). Village walking is extremely slippery in winter. Friends and family have taken bad falls -inexcusable for a world class resort like Vail. Two, or least one, more lights are needed between Golden Peak bus stop and entrance to Northwoods Condos. Sharp curve going uphill on Main Gore Drive is dangerous especially for school children. There is no where for them to walk - need a sidewalk. 1-8 Street lighting Never replaced after last year. There is one street light on Buffher Creek Road and Frontage Road and Chamonix Lane and nothing in all the rest of West Vail. Light up hazardous areas of Dowd Junction. State turnoff (first bridge) in Intermountain should be lit. 1-9 Speeding or reckless automobiles Frontage roads J Major problem, mainly during "seasons". Have noticed considerable driving in excess of 45 posted speed. Drivers must know Frontage Road is rarely patrolled, particularly in the "off-season". Why is it possible for guests to run stop signs, and pass on frontage roads with a police officer near? Need speed limit signs and enforcement. 4 1-10 Speeding or reckless automobiles Neighborhood roads People use Chamonix Lane (behind Safeway) like the Frontage Road -too fast. Red Sandstone Road = 15 m.p.h.; no one goes up or down the street at 15 m.p.h. Chamonix Lane's (West of Texaco) speed limit of 25 m.p.h. is far too fast and should be 15. The speed limit sign has been lying on the ground for three months or more. Major problem, mainly during "seasons". Speeding on Chamonix West of Days Inn hotel. This is a serious problem; children and people are at risk!! Need speed limit signs and enforcement. Drivers go too fast on Main Gore Drive. 1-11 Crime against persons or property Property theft -bikes, property in cars. The police ticket for parking (not consistently) but take four hours to respond to an in-home robbery. 4 1-12 Neighborhood noise The only major noise from freeway. Jake brakes from I-70 -East Vail. I live on the Frontage Road right where trucks make the most noise. Neighbor without muffler for six months. Barking dogs at all hours, often on their own property. Noise from Jackalope Bar. J 1-13 Overhead utilities Remove power lines. Low hanging, then snow and ice buildup make it more dangerous. Overhead utilities on Bighorn Road were promised to be moved underground in early 1980's... still no change. Is this Holy Cross's problem or TOV? 1-14 Pollution from wood smoke Some of the employee housing in the valley is so poorly constructed and insulated that banning wood stoves would be unfair. The new law on disallowing wood fireplaces should be repealed! Use a voluntary ban on burning during high pollution days like Denver or go to an even/odd burn day like Aspen! Mainly winter months (major problem). Too many fireplaces. Would be (is) a huge mistake to outlaw fireplaces. Most locals use only for atmosphere. and not that often. Tourists come to relax before a wood fire (and benefit from) as much as they come for clean air!! Road dust is more of a problem! 1-15 Pollution from road dust y Not a problem for breathing, but road dust makes for dirty windows, dirty curtains and draperies, dirty balconies, and dirty cars, necessitating an extra lot of cleaning work to be done. Mainly winter months (major problem). OTHER COMMENTS: Bus stops need shelters and lights. It's pitch dark and dangerous to walk home from them. The State should maintain Dowd Junction better in the winter. Bike paths need sweeping. Need a bike path on Highway 6. Parking enforcement inconsistent. Bike riders not using bike paths is an extreme problem. Five to six cars are parked in the street all winter. Is Matterhorn a commercial area? Need traffic control at West Vail four-ways and need traffic lights at Main Vail four-way. Persecution of residents with reasonable outdoor lighting is greatly over-done. Neon Lights sign on Lodge at Vail Tower apt. - we protest this, it is not like Vail! Please Push to Turn OFF. "Bikers" and "walkers" not wearing reflective strips on clothing -after dark, particularly in winter; it is hazardous driving Frontage Roads. Cinders used on roads during winter accumulate in substantial quantities where snow is pushed or blown. Many yards have accumulation from snow blowers. It would be great of cinders could be confined to road, collected, and re-used. Snow removal at 4:30 a.m. with dozer, loader, and semi -does it have to be that early?! Outdoor bars in Lionshead music is much too loud after skiing. 2 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF THE FOLLOWING TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES? (QUALITY OF SERVICE IS DEFINED AS THE STANDARD OF SERVICE YOU RECEIVE, WHILE QUANTITY CAN BE DESCRIBED AS THE LEVEL OR FREQUENCY.) 2-1 Snow removal and sanding of streets Streets should be sanded/salted at holidays too. Safety is more important than white streets at Christmas. Too much sand. A little less gravel would be okay. Snow removal and sanding of I-70 between Vail and East Vail is poor to non- existent. I've seen plows out with less than one inch of snow. Bighorn road needs better winter sanding. 2-2 Snow removal and sanding of sidewalks and public stairways Need to clean bike paths in winter for bicycle commuters; notably Westin - Matterhorn and North Frontage path. 2-3 Street repair Street repair is always done after it gets really bad. Repair potholes faster. Problems mainly with pothole repair. Street repair on frontage road and underpasses is very poor. 2-4 Street sweeping: Summer season for street cleaning purposes , Dust is horrible. My sinuses go nuts during winter/spring. 2-5 Street sweeping: Winter season for air quality purposes Have never seen street sweeping in winter -and the streets are usually icy, not dusty. Dust is horrible. My sinuses go nuts during winter/spring. Earlier clean-up of gravel on road shoulders and neighborhood roads. 2-6 Street lighting No Lights! Great!! 2-10 Neighborhood police patrols Have never seen a neighborhood police patrol. 2-11 Business area police patrols Police patrols during five hour power outage were excellent! 4 2-12 Traffic law enforcement--Frontage roads Speed limit too low in summer. Attitude should be helpful and preventative -not "hiding in bushes". 2-14 Traffic Control--4-way Stop When there are control officers, it slows down traffic. 2-15 Enforcement of parking regulations: Neighborhoods Not consistent. 2-17 Response time of Vail police officers to calls for assistance It took an officer four hours to come to my home when I was robbed. I never saw him, and nothing was really done. The police have time to put parking tickets on cars when they are two feet in front of a sign (front end) but no time to investigate a robbery. 2-19 Police investigations There is too much red tape/paper work and not enough attention to details of what actually happened. Seems police pre judge what they think applies to certain situations. L 2-20 Animal control Need more! Leash law not enforced. You would have a lot more success if you varied your hours of animal control in Intermountain. 2-21 Sign code enforcement Need to outline more specifically all guidelines. Too many schedules to accomplish a simple design. Lodge Towers has neon sign. Randomly enforced. Go after 'bad" signs. 2-22 Municipal Court Get a new judge. Great except for scheduling/time waiting to speak with prosecutor, etc. 2-27 Building plan review ' Gateway not consistent with Alpine Village. Lionshead not consistent with any plan. Lousy long range TOV plans. Y 2-29 Bus system -Shuttle route Buses should run consistent year-round. Need an additional stop on West Meadow Drive between Alphorn and Skaal House to better serve National Bank Building and Scorpio. System like last winter good. New transportation plan for West Vail is not sufficient. This is very important to us! Especially in summer, the in-town shuttle runs far too slowly (too much time between buses -you can always beat it by walking)! 2-30 Bus system -Sandstone route The proposed new circular North and South Frontage bus loops are a good idea (had suggested it long ago!} but the east bound North Frontage bus needs to stop at Sandstone as well -not just westbound -otherwise they are coming up short of the whole purpose -which is to service both directions of the valley. The bus system needs to be more linear, and less hub and spoke. Too little of in off-seasons. 2-31 Bus system -East Vail route Should coordinate an E.V. bus for school times (through golf course route) Mountain School -this year it was discontinued and may of our children use the bus! My kids need transportation while I work! Run hourly through whole day to East Vail! In the off-season, why run buses from 3:00-6:00. Why not 4:00-7:00. A lot of people do not get off work until 5:00. If you miss the 6:00 bus, it's a long walk to East Vail. I am too far from the bus stop to effectively use bus system. The bus system needs to be more linear, and less hub and spoke. Bus passes you by from 8-10:30 a.m. in winter at Pitkin Creelc. More buses are needed! Several buses passed by "FULL" during spring skiing EACH morning, making me late for work/appointments. Off season cut-backs are too much. Extend to 7:00 p.m. and more mid-day. Golf course needs own route/bus -very few drops and pickups with East Vail bus. More rounds could be made to East Vail utilizing that time! Too little of in off-seasons. The new full time East Vail express has now corrected the problem. 2-32 Bus system -West Vail routes Loop routes in West Vail -finally!! Diesel clouds from buses are terrible. Go to LPG! Need way to go from south/north side. To get from Matterhorn to town, you have to travel to Intermountain first. A crossover bus between H & S would lessen travel time. Driver didn't stop at scheduled stop, and appeared drunk another time. West Vail North both times. The bus system needs to be more linear, and less hub and spoke. New transportation plan for West Vail is not sufficient. New hours this winter - much better!! Need better coverage in summer. Good in winter, and bad-poor rest of year. Too little of in off-seasons. 2-33 Library hours ' Need book drop-off. A book drop is needed since it's impossible to drive directly to the library -areal problem for those with babies, toddlers, etc. Would like library to open earlier on Sundays. 2-34 Selection of library books available Not enough books, especially serious books for scholars; and too many video and audio cassettes in proportion to books. Too many romance novels! 2-35 Selection of video and audio cassettes available ' Not enough books, especially serious books for scholars; and too many video and audio cassettes in proportion to books. 2-36 Library adult programs offered (Adventure Series, Author Nights, special events) 2-38 Community Room offerings (art shows, public forums, etc.) Should get commissions for TOV. 2-39 Planning and Environmental Commission ' Does not communicate or public goals. No goals or objectives! Covers total incompetence with bureaucratic mess -very costly! in current $ and future of community. Bring zoning codes, variances restrictions up to 1990's expectations and plans and keep all potential developments/remodels and new construction on an even playing field. Too much political maneuvering on these matters. Make your rules and keep them! Fuzzy thinking! The Vail Gateway Building and the Tennenbaum residence are eyesores in a community that is supposed to resemble analpine-design town. Too much favoritism has been allowed. to avoid compliance with origin~~l zoning regulations. Policies are not consistent. Need more emphasis on "environmental"... there's too much on development. . 2-40 Design Review Board DRB should allow larger houses and fireplaces. Bring zoning codes, variances restrictions up to 1990's expectations and plans and keep all potential developments/remodels and new construction on an even playing field. Too much political maneuvering on these matters. Make your rules and keep them! Erratic at times -they work hard on a volunteer basis, but some of the decisions are questionable, and who's best interest? Design Review Board not strict enough - no consistency -you can build almost anything. The Vail Gateway Building and the Tennenbaum residence are eyesores in a community that is supposed to resemble analpine-design town. Too much favoritism has been allowed to avoid compliance with original zoning regulations. Policies are not consistent. Building permits are very inconsistent and biased. Too many chiefs. Way too many restrictions. Example design of Tennenbaum house not in keeping with Vail architecture. 2-42 Town Council Fuzzy thinking! Meetings are too damned long too often! Town Council members should be more organized - no unity. The Vail Gateway Building and the Tennenbaum residence are eyesores in a community that is supposed to resemble analpine-design town. Too much favoritism has been allowed to avoid compliance with original zoning regulations. Post-Caccioppo era excellent. Don't address most important issues in timely fashion. Quit looking for projects!! Get rid of special interest people and replace with general interested people. The Town Council is out of touch with the majority of people living in town (with the exception of real estate agents). The Town Council needs to collect information independently from the Town Manager. The Town Council has lost the good will and credibility of the town citizens. Replacing the Town Manager would be a step towards rebuilding that credibility and good will. Inconsistent. 2-43 Town Administration " The Vail Gateway Building and the Tennenbaum residence are eyesores in a community that is supposed to resemble analpine-design town. Too much favoritism has been allowed to avoid compliance with original zoning regulations. Too rigid, negative feelings. OTHER COMMENTS: The parking structure is disgusting -dirty, trashy -it's embarrassing that it was open and charging full rate in the winter. Please clean it up!! Consistent enforcement of liquor laws and underage drinking -parking regulations are enforced more consistently than underage drinking. It's a mixed message to youth. 1990-92 parking coupons should have refund. Pam Brandmeyer is very responsive and helpful. . Very little long range leadership shown by present Town Council and D & R boards. Town Planning Department and parking control are very inconsistent, giving the impression of favoritism, corruption. Many Town employees are extremely rude, inconsiderate, and unhelpful. Village Parking Structure is filthy, poorly designed, and an embarrassment to Vail. Is Vail supposed to be a recreation town, or a sanitarium? Visitors from aborad resent overmuch regulation by "Big Brother". too much time is wasted on such trivialities as smoking cigarettes. Obviously, the Town Council has no problems with their own parking -aren't they elected with promises of helping the local situation. The bus routes, other than Vail, are not very well organized, and running hours are far too few. The town manager needs to be replaced. A large part of the population of Vail and Eagle County does not like him or trust him. His presence handicaps the town's efforts in programs both within the Town of Vail and in Eagle County. If there was parking on North Frontage Road, and bus serves, you could relieve pressure on parking garages and areas in Core Village. Too many in town office. 3 HOW IMPORTANT TO YOU ARE THE FOLLOWING CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR USE OF THE TOWN'S TAX DOLLARS 3-1 Conference and performance center Build a second ice surface and let Dobson become a true multi-purpose facility. This will bring in more tax dollars to enable us to do more of the other projects. No other projects will bring in more tax dollars. Would enhance off-season and summer activities and events, also, bring in more - revenue and create jobs. 3-2 Affordable housing directed by Vail's Housing Authority within Town of Vail limits Affordable housing is key, but, let the private sector do it. Give tax incentives but don't make this a governmental project. Create without potential of obligating the town long term. Affordable housing is not what you think is affordable! $525 for a one bedroom is not affordable. Housing is absolutely the most important. Affordable housing for seasonal or non- seasonal workers does not exist in great enough numbers. If we don't correct this soon, Vail will not have quality workers to support Vail's community. WAKE UP! If Vail has not affordable housing or some kind of rent control, all you will get are transient workers who don't give a damn about the Town of Vail. Vail is finding too many reasons not to go ahead with employee housing, and meanwhile, the shortage is forcing rents up and making it tougher for all of us - throughout the valley - to live. Vail and Vail Associates need to do something NOW! Take a hint from Avon. Let this be a private enterprise. Quit studying and talking about it -just do it!! Low cost housing is more appropriate in other areas of "Vail Valley". The "affordable housing" that I have seen is extremely ugly - in design of exterior of the buildings, drab gray paint, not trees, or other landscaping. Affordable housing here or down valley is essential. I've lived here for 15 years and may have to move (me and my family) soon because of the exorbitant cost of _ living, compared to the limited and seasonal income. If Vail is to remain competitive, it must make this community a home for its long-term or permanent residents. Affordable housing in TOV limits -not to be done. I think affordable housing is very important, but not within the T.O.V. I think Berry Creek and other areas down valley are better for housing. Within reasonable limits. 3-3 Tree and shrub planting along highways for landscaping and screening ' purposes Take care of (water) what we have. 3-4 Maintaining the 105 acres of Berry Creek property in Town of Vail ownership for recreation and housing purposes (purchase price $1.876 million) Berry Creek property is very important to the future of Vail (Eagle) Valley resident housing, and recreation/open space. Promote reasonable phased development of housing and recreation. The Berry Creek purchase was a very bad move on the Town's part. Unnecessary! 3-6 Enhancement of connection between Vail Village and Lionshead along Meadow Drive (a pedestrian mall, nature walk, alpine garden, sculpture plaza, etc.) Sidewalks needed all along Meadow Drive. Need Streamwalk in that area. 3-7 Completion of Donovan Park (play field, playground, picnic areas, sand volleyball courts, basketball court, skating pond, etc.) 3-& Landscaping at I-70 interchanges Clean up and mowing high -big $ low. I-70 East Vail Interchange doesn't look like much value for $'s spent. Evergreens are dead. Why not summer plantings with perennials and rock formations with Aspens or other deciduous trees. 3-9 Revegetation of all road cuts Mostly being attempted now. 3-10 Completion of recreation path from West Vail to Highways 6 and 24 (through Dowd Junction) Dowd Junction is too unsafe for it to be a main artery for all bicycle traffic between Vail and down-valley areas. A safe, wide path through Dowd Junction is a necessity. Bike path from Dowd Junction to Eagle-Vail. To think that in 1991 we still have to ride our bikes along the interstate to ride down valley. The Town has really dropped the ball here. 3-11 Completion of a recreation path and walkway, from Golden Peak to Ford Amphitheater, adjacent to roadway Transportation for events at Ford Park. NO! Not adjacent to roadway. 3-12 Additional pedestrian overpass in West Vail in Cascade Village/Timber Ridge/new Post Office area Either or with best solution = 3/14. Pedestrian pass should be done as part of underpass. I would only agree with this if it were mainly funded by Cascade Village/Timber Ridge. There are more and more pedestrian-car accidents from residents trying to cross the freeway in this area. Human lives rate higher for me than landscaping. Could be combined (with 3-14) - include a walkway with the underpass (no need for a separate pedestrian overpass). Underpass. Cascade Village is growing all the time, it employs quite a number of people. Timber Ridge and surrounding areas house quite a number of people. The path between the two is quite established. People will continue to cross there until someone gets killed. With the new post office, it's obviously a source of increased traffic. The best thing would be to put a car and pedestrian way connecting the two (this would also take some much needed stress away from the 4-way and West Vail), but if the vehicular connection is too expensive at the present (it will definitely have to materialize within the next 3-4 years though), then for the moment, there needs to be at least a pedestrian crossing available. I would much rather ride my bike, than drive up to the 4-way and back to Cascade. (I have never crossed the interstate.) I don't feel that both are needed. With the addition of an underpass, it may help traffic problems at 4-way stop. Need parking at post office side. 3-13 Development of low impact pedestrian path along Gore Creek connecting ' Ford Park with Lionshead No path along Gore Creek is acceptable to owners of property along the creek Drop the subject. 3-14 New underpass between Main Vail and West Vail interchanges, connecting North and South Frontage Roads Either or with best solution = 3-12. Could be combined (with 3-12) - include a walkway with the underpass (no need for a separate pedestrian overpass). I don't feel that both are needed. With the addition of an underpass, it may help traffic problems at 4-way stop. Underpass -could be more costly by many times over pass? OTHER COMMENTS: ' Instead of taking care of visual things, we should look more into taking care of people that live here. Safety of citizens first. Environment second. Convenience third. Town should not pay for items to make businesses money. That is the private sector's job. When I ask most locals & visitors what is the biggest aesthetic drawback to the Valley -the answer is resounding... the visual and audio impact of I-70. There are _ a number of long stretches of berm along the frontage road that could be planted with shrubs and deciduous trees (which would not cause winter road glazing with the leaves gone) and which can also absorb the pollution (instead of mowing them each year!) Not only does Vail deserve it, but, more importantly, the planet. the same type of shrubbery that has a maximum height needs to go along the center of I-70 corridor. Where is a question concerning the cemetery in Vail? . To have a bus shelter at all out of town stops would be a great improvement. Transportation Center is for cars -NOT BUSINESS, Town Offices, or the Ski Museum. TOV should focus $ in three main areas. 1) improving summer business potential, convention/arts center, bike paths, I-70 landscaping; 2) encourage more employee housing with subsidies or zoning. ~ Spread it out -don't mass together; 3) reduce dividing nature of I-70 = we do need another exchange at Cascade Village and an improved West Vail exchange. A lot of these have the same priority. I would like to feel safe riding a bicycle on the roads, which would entail widening the frontage roads. The bike paths seem to have become walkways and bicycles are using the roads more and more. Bicycle rules seem to be non-existent. It is very difficult to get around town on some roads -especially 6-24. I think the Town needs to support affordable housing, but not necessarily within Town of Vail. Forget capital projects and do something about better traffic control in regard to speeding, stop signs, etc. We have plenty of open space now. We need to do things which appeal to tourists. Making their stay as pleasant as possible and their memories of how beautiful our Village appears so they will think it is unique, tell other, and return! OTHER COMMENTS (Continued): Some people are going to get killed before traffic flow slows down in Cascade Village and Timber Ridge area. In the past few years, we have shot down and aquatic center, a convention center, a performing arts center, because of 0 leadership and 0 progressive thinking in TOV. In general, I favor projects that will make Vail look more natural and beautiful. I oppose those that accommodate or encourage more growth and more tourists. We also don't need more man-made recreation. There's plenty of natural recreation here, as long as we don't crowd ourselves too much. We need more space -not more employee housing to support growth! Either fix West Vail exit or put another exist at Cascade Village. No feeling on above, but keep taxes under control. It would have been helpful to know the approximate cost of these projects. It is virtually impossible to rank these without the ability to consider acost/benefit relationship. The poor, young, working class Vailites deserve more attention than they are getting. Regarding ABC School expansion and the Towri s requirements of debris flow berm and paver parking lot why should ABC be required to pay for these items when it is indeed the Town's property that ABC is leasing. It is, after all, a site/land improvement that should be the Town's financial responsibility. I could live without any of the above being done. The 4-way stops and exit ramps from I-70 are so dangerous, confusing, time consuming. Until you've been in a crippling car wreck, you cannot believe the fears experienced when a car is coming at you. We desperately need stop lights at those spots. Each day, we take our lives in our hands in those areas. When considering vegetation along roadways and highway interchanges, those plants that require the least maintenance (i.e., water, man hours) should be given priority. We believe a conference and performance center is essential for Vail to continue to attract new visitors. Gore Creek is an incredible natural resource. A path would enable more people to enjoy its (illegible). ` If Vail stops the additional need for growth, we inevitably will not need more employee housing. OTHER COMMENTS (Continued): Trees along the interstate will create more of a problem for Vail's medical services than would be worth in the long run. Think about these things: housing, attitude adjustment amongst employees, bike paths, the police and hiring them, traffic lights, more affordable anything! It seems that the only people that have a problem with the conditions in town are the people that live here -not the guests. The guests are pleased with our amenities. The locals are having a hard time with living conditions. Let's focus on improving the life-style and livability for the residents. Affordable housing and open space seems to be (to me) the two most important goals for the Town of Vail. These are seemingly paradoxical goals. We need to work on alternatives for employee/affordable housing and yet, we want to maintain the beauty of Vail, as well as the feeling of being away from a city. We live in a narrow valley. Open space needs to be optimized. A big thank-you to whoever plowed the East Vail Bike Path (Old Highway 6) up to the Cul-de-Sac. It made for great spring riding. High priority for me would be bike path maintenance, especially up to Vail Pass. I cannot complete this section because only 3-4 has a dollar amount, and 14 is too many for this kind of survey. Survey poorly laid out, lacks consistency. On one page you are rating good to bad, and the next page it is opposite. This makes survey harder to understand and follow. So questions misleading, no dollar amounts for some projects in section #3. #1 priority -toilet and locker facilities at the soccer field for use by field participants, Ford Park users parking at soccer field, and also used by golfers. Users include: mess soccer, ladies soccer, kids soccer, rugby, LaCrosse, LaCrosse on 4th of July, golfers, cyclists, Ford Park users, cross country skiers, skier day . ~ parking. Revegetation of the Booth Creek berm would be appreciated. There are adequate recreation paths in the wilderness areas. Why don t you list the ugly gash over Booth Creek for re-vegetation. OTHER COIVEvIENTS (Continued): Housing and holding rental rates down is by far the most important! When are we going to stop reading and talking about how important it is, and that something must be done, and start acting on it instead? The issue has been a "priority" for years now, but so far, nothing has truly been accomplished. We can't expect to force everyone who doesn't own (notice I'm not saying seasonal workers, I'm more concerned about people really trying to live here -with professional jobs -and still can't cut it with rent) a place to live in Eagle, Red Cliff, or Leadville. It's getting ridiculous! In response to #3-12 and #3-14, one of these needs to be accomplished soon, before someone dies. Get more competitive bids -I've heard the Vail Golf Course Starter building cost $400,000. I'd like to have had the contract for $100,000, and made money -tax dollars belong to the people. You are the Administrator, try always to do the best job you can. This is a problem all over the country. We need good management, do your best, save our taxes. Access through Dowd Junction -bike path is extremely important since it is a very dangerous and much used stretch of the highway! A performance center is much needed - let's emphasize the arts instead of sports for a change! None have high priority. The highway is becoming busier and noisier. I'm not sure there is a solution to this giant source of pollution and noise. 4 GENERAL QUESTIONS 4-1 How important is it to you for the Town of Vail to provide bus service to-- Eagle-Vail Are the towns in questions 4-1 through 4-4 contributing financially to the bus service? They should be, if not. Not important for us directly, but for others, yes. 4-2 How important is it to you for the Town of Vail to provide bus service to-- Avon Are the towns in questions 4-1 through 4-4 contributing financially to the bus service? They should be, if not. Not important for us directly, but for others, yes. 4-3 How important is it to you for the Town of Vail to provide bus service to-- Edwazds Are the towns in questions 4-1 through 4-4 contributing financially to the bus service? They should be, if not. Not important for us directly, but for others, yes. 4-4 How important is it to you for the Town of Vail to provide bus service to Minturn Are the towns in questions 4-1 through 4-4 contributing financially to the bus service? They should be, if not. Not important for us directly, but for others, yes. 45 How important is a sales tax of up to .5% to support regional bus service - Increased ridership and fare increases should eliminate need for increase. Private? Tax is high enough! Confusing wording. I consider these issues important. It is important not to raise taxes to provide regional bus service. Of course, Eagle-Vail, Avon, and Minturn would also increase it's sales tax .5%. Do not raise sales taxes for anv reason. Or charge riders $.50 to $1.00. We pay too much - do not do. I support it. Do not raise taxes. 4-6 How important is an increase in property tax, or some alternative tax, to support the construction of a new Police Department facility Property taxes for resident home owners are already too high! DON'T!! Property taxes are much too high and unfair as it is. Sales tax is a far better way to go. It costs too much for locals to live in Vail now! Do not increase property taxes for anv reason. Property taxes have been raised 50% in last eight years. No need to build an ivory tower. What's this $249,000 in "Final Design" - a little over budget? We pay too much - do not do. We need incentive programs to convert. Separate Town Hall and Police. 4-7 The Town of Vail recently banned woodburning fireplaces and stoves in ' newly constructed units within Town limits. A program was also initiated to encourage voluntary conversion to gas fireplaces, appliances, and stoves, with the program evaluated after two years. How important do yo consider implementation of further restrictions on fireplaces and wood burning stoves in Vail for air quality purposes What program was initiated to encourage conversion to gas fireplaces? We don't know anything about this program. Rental units should stock enough wood for 3-4 hours per day. Do you contemplate a police state modeled upon Hitlerrs Germany? People should be encouraged to burn less wood and convert to other forms of heat than wood, but they should not be required to do so at this time. One idea would be to offer tax incentives or tax breaks for people who converted woodburning fireplaces to gas or some other heat source. We strongly oppose further efforts to restrict use of existing fireplaces. Wood fires in the winter are part of the joy we look forward to in returning to Vail each year! Unfortunately, guests that stay in Vail want to burn a natural fire. Do not do! On existing fireplaces. There aren't that many new constructions compared to the number that exists, and the new ones can afford to pay to have their luxury. 4-8 A voluntary Valleywide recycling program, supported in part with Town of Vail funds, has been implemented. How important do you consider implementation of a mandatory recycling program in Vail Do you contemplate a police state modeled upon Hitler's Germany? I think businesses need more incentive to voluntarily recycle, but I don t think there should be laws to that effect. We do not even have mandatory trash collection. Recycling is very complicated, but essential. 4-9 How important do you consider implementation of mandatory smoking " restrictions for public places in Vail Don't make this a political thing. Do you contemplate a police state modeled upon Hitler s Germany? 4-10 How important do you consider implementation of further measures to improve water quality in creek areas OTHER COMMENTS: Town budget too high for non-essentials. Use budget for things like the police station. 4-1 through 4-4 are very important as we need to lessen the parking problem. 5 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 5-1 Restructure the West Vail routes to provide cross circulation between the north and south sides of I-70 ($100,000 per year). I don't believe this ($100,000). Or additional pedestrian overpasses. 5-2 Acquire a new bus fleet for the In-Town Shuttle to increase efficiency. New buses would have lower floors, wider doors, and the possibility of allowing the passenger to carry skis on board if it can be done safely ($4,500,000 net cost). Leave the skis outside! People can t walk down Bridge Street with skis safely - how can they ride a bus with skis inside? Look at Copper's system for the in-town shuttle. Can't be done. Someone will be seriously injured by child or careless adult. If the $'s are worth it. For 4+ million, I can walk a few minutes. How about lowering pollution caused by buses? If a new fleet of buses is to be brought in, it should be either electric or natural gas, it is hypocritical to ban woodburning and not address the pollution from diesel and gas fumes!! 5-3 In the long term, acquire Vail Associates' West Day Lot for a small two- story parking structure. For LOCAL EMPLOYEES? (as opposed to tourists...) Maybe these two (5-4) could be for local employees, and/or pass holders. Perhaps a different rate... Vail Associates should build and pay for this themselves, we should not be involved in subsidized parking anymore at this time. Perhaps V.A. should do. 5-4 Preserve the east end of Ford Park for a small two-story parking structure, not higher than the existing lot For LOCAL EMPLOYEES? (as opposed to tourists...) Maybe these two (5-4) could be for local employees, and/or pass holders. Perhaps a different rate... Softball on top essential. 5-5 Eliminate truck parking on Bridge Street Better regulation, not elimination. Except at designated hours or unless 5-9/5-10 work Enforce time for unloading, etc. Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Merchandise still must be delivered so wouldn't additional handling add to the cost of merchandise? 5-6 Eliminate truck parking on Gore Creek Drive from Checkpoint Charlie to Mill Creek Better regulation, not elimination. Except at designated hours or unless 5-9/5-10 work Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Merchandise still must be delivered so wouldn't additional handling add to the cost of merchandise? 5-7 Convert all 15 minute parking areas in Vail Village to truck loading zones Temporary until underground facility completed and police time restrictions. No thanks!!! Leave one at each end. Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Local non-truck businesses need 15 minutes loading zones for delivery. Please leave the current one at each end of the core non-truck (not restricted to trucks only). Handicap parking included? 5-8 Provide parking spaces for delivery trucks over Mill Creek between Cyranos and the Christiania to eliminate parking on Hanson Ranch Road ($100,000) Why $100,000 for some signs and paint? First see if it is necessary. Why consider eliminating such a grand view of the Creek and Mountain? NO!! No! Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Merchandise still must be delivered so wouldn't additional handling add to the cost of merchandise? You want to brick over a creek? You obviously don't care about the environment or the beauty of this place. Why don't you just brick over all the creeks and greenspace and make Vail a giant parking lot. Stupid. 5-9 Develop a centralized loading area beneath the Christiania pazking to eliminate all on-street parking in the east Vail Village area. The centralized loading area may or may not provide storage units for individual businesses ($1,000,000) Too much money. Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Merchandise still must be delivered so wouldn't additional handling add to the cost of merchandise? Where would this $ come from? One or the other (5-10). Don't even try to build this -I'll fight you every inch of the way. Would you like a truck loading zone in your bedroom window? 5-10 Develop another underground central loading lot, located south of the Lodge ' at Vail, to eliminate all on-street parking in the west Vail Village area (Willow Bridge Road - $1,000,000) Too much. Would generate too much traffic in this area. Think of "quality of traffic" between one quick truck stop along Gore Creek Drive versus several lengthy treks with deliverymen and loaded handcarts. Is this either or? Where would this $ come from? One or the other (5-9). 5-11 Modify I-70 access by closing the westbound off-ramp and eastbound on- ramp during peak periods at the main Vail interchange (December-March), allowing vehicles from Denver to use the East Vail exit exclusively ($500,000) Just encourage using of East exit. NO!! Bad idea. Terrible idea! No! This could inconvenience some locals. This will place quite a burden on the Frontage Road. Too much foul-up, need stop lights. Where would this $ come from? Will create massive back-up on the frontage roads. 5-12 Provide new on and off ramps for eastbound traffic at the Booth Falls underpass near Aspen Lane ($1,000,000) No thank you! More traffic on Frontage Road and decrease value of the 11th Filing. Where would this $ come from? 5-13 Improve the West Vail interchange to provide for better traffic maneuverability ($500,000) Enforce stop on South Frontage Road. Where would this $ come from? No signal lights. y 5-14 Provide new on and off ramps for eastbound I-70 near the Vail Associates shops ($1,500,000) Off only! Best idea yet! Where would this $ come from? t 5-15 Provide avehicular/pedestrian underpass connecting the North and South Frontage Roads just west of Simba Run ($2,000,000) Too much money. Where would this $ come from? t 5-16 Provide turn lanes on the frontage roads for left and right turning vehicles along key roadway stretches and intersections. Where left turn lanes are not required, the center area would be landscaped ($3,500,000) Where would this $ come from? 5-17 Provide six (6) foot paved shoulders along both sides of each frontage road for bicycles ($1,500,000) Better street cleaning and more police speed traps =clean surface and slower traffic. One side of each frontage road is sufficient. The County does such a poor job maintaining the Frontage Road now, we have a three foot shoulder which is barely visible because it's covered with gravel. Let's maintain what we have. What about our great bike path. I always use it, and I don't understand why others don't! Would help motorists -but it's costly. Just do 5-18 instead of 5-17. Where would this $ come from? 5-18 Completion of an off-street recreation path from East Vail to Dowd Junction Just do 5-18 instead of 5-17. 5-19 Intermountain to Dowd Junction recreation path Too many bike casualties. { 5-20 Stephen's Park to Donovan Park recreation path • Village recreatton path 5 21 Library to Vail { 5-22 Gold Peak to Katsos Ranch recreation path a t 5-23 East Vail Interchange to Gore Creek Campground recreation path Completed to last turnoff. As a resident of East Vail, the number of bike riders up to Vail Pass seems to be increasing daily, I think a recreation path is greatly needed for safety! r OTHER COIVEvIENTS: Purchase only LPG buses and convert existing buses that will be kept for a reasonable period. We are a leading community in the environment, beautiful surroundings for guests, and town planning. No excuse to have diesel buses belching smoke all over town. Provide outlying park and ride lots. Restructuring parking rates as many employee/local parkers drive in alone. Penalize sole occupant cars by rate and reward car poolers. Did the person who developed this survey have a working knowledge of the English language? This survey is confusing and misleading. When and if you get a bike path to Dowd Junction, you will be amazed by the number of riders using it. With all this parking, it sound like Bridge Street will be wall-to-wall with people. Is this our future? We have a $10 million plus parking structure and cars have started lining Frontage Road for softball games, creating hazardous biking and driving conditions. Surely these athletes can walk a few blocks and use the expensive structure - or concert nights a TOV bus shuttle could run from the structures. $'s too high, spend less!! 1 GENERAL COMMENTS: Print this questionnaire on thinner paper with fewer pages (i.e., more to a page) and on 100% recycled paper. Questionnaire is a great thing and gives people a chance to react to government without attending a meeting on each issue. Keep up the good work!!! This survey is important -keep up the good work! I appreciate your interest in what I and other Vail citizens have to say! The 1990 Recap and Budget explanations is very well done. I think you all are doing a fine job considering the changes occurring in the Valley and the TOV! Another problem surfacing is increasing numbers of skiers due to area expansion - yes, the town infrastructure has no way to expand. Building more parking for day skiers does not necessarily help all the shops and restaurants, and the bed base has scarcely increased with no new hotel construction. The ski lift tax stand to ' benefit, but will it cover the added services expenses, or will it ultimately drive away the destination guest due to over-crowded conditions? When the village is crowded, skate boarding and biking is dangerous in the core -streets just areri t wide enough for trucks, bikers, skate boarders, and pedestrians. What is the status of the Performing Arts Center, and the $1,000,000 gift? Moneys have been expended for studies and to the best of my knowledge, I've not seen any public statements of it's progress. Quantity of services should never be confused with quality. Vail has never seemed to know the difference. i-i [ ~ S vP0 _ p,e T ~ .,r ~ , . ~ u t ''4~'1 TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2105/FAX 303-479-2157 MEMORANDUM TO: VAIL TOWN COUNCIL FROM: PAM BRANDMEYER DATE: AUGUST 1, 1991 RE: COUNCIL LONG-TERM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES At a February 19, 1991, special meeting, Town Council established long-term goals and objectives for the calendar year 1991. A listing of these priorities, by vote count, is as follows: 1. Housing 8 2. Long-Range Strategic Plans 7 3. Police Building 6 4. Lionshead Master Plan 6 5. Marketing 5 6. Implementation of a Parking Transportation Plan 4 7. Environment 4 8. Ten-year Tree Planting Program 4 What follows is a brief synopsis showing progress to this date in each category. . 1. HOUSING A housing authority has been established for the Town of Vail. Experts on housing issues have met with the authority for several months. The group is meeting twice a week in order to become familiar with various housing alternatives. Once the initial education process is completed, the board intends to develop a road map or action plan for their efforts. Jill Kammerer has been assigned as the staff person for the board. The issue of a permanent staff position for the housing authority needs to be addressed in the near future. Currently, the housing authority is scheduled to appear before the Council at a work session on August 13, 1991, to discuss funding and potential types of employee/affordable housing to be pursued. 2. LONG-RANGE STRATEGIC PLAN ~ r The Vail Symposium is initiating efforts to develop a valleywide process to look at community issues. On behalf of the Vail Symposium, Sherry Dorward is leading this effor,~t. Jn~~~~.stan Pritz ,~s-~the staff member~~ 3. POLICE BUILDING The municipal complex task force had outlined a process as it related to the resolution of a space shortage issue involving the Police Department and other municipal government departments. A contract had been negotiated with Roth Sheppard/Snowden Hopkins to implement a phased approach to the project: (a) to identify and address technical concerns for the Lionshead site as well as the current municipal site in regard to noise vibration, ventilation, ramping, and so on, and to discuss with PEC/DRB the model and to provide perspective drawings; (b) to obtain PEC/DRB review and approval with appropriate floor plans and drawings; (c) to provide a final design. Following community input at a public meeting, it was decided to focus on the current municipal complex site and to concentrate on the Police facility only. A vigorous campaign to educate and inform the public is underway, replete with open houses, press releases, and media arrests. Through the month of August and early September, staff members will meet with members of the community to discuss the plans for the Police facility. 4. LIONSHEAD MASTER PLAN This planning effort will be addressed in the Community Development Department's 1992 budget. The intent of the plan is to use a similar process as was used in the streetscape plan to look at potential for infill development, landscape improvements, and other alternatives to improve the attractiveness of the Lionshead area. The Council is aware that Eldon Beck and Sherry Dorward have been hired by the Lionshead Merchant's Association using funds from the Lionshead Mall Improvement District to begin the Master Plan process in 1991. 5. MARKETING The efforts of the Vail Valley Marketing Board are now in their third year. The Board continues to work closely with Shenkein Advertising Agency in Denver in an effort to continually define Vail's target markets and receive the greatest publicity possible for the dollars invested by the Vail Valley. - 2 - ~ The bulk of the marketing funds in the first two years of the VVMB campaign were spent targeting the Colorado resident and destination travelers arriving in Colorado who had no specific resort area in mind. The lion's share of the marketing and advertising dollars was spent on the front range and throughout the state. As research has more clearly defined exactly what populations comprise our summer markets and which areas of the country are most likely to respond to Vail advertising, the VVMB has channeled its funds increasingly toward the national marketplace, the destination traveler, and to group meeting and convention travelers. Increased funding has also been channeled toward the public relations effort, which last year showed a return of $650,000.00 worth of coverage for approximately $50,000.00 invested. The impact of marketing, advertising, and public relations is cumulative, and as is generally understood within the field, begins to truly reap benefits in the third year of effort. The VVMB will continue to work for broadened Vail Valley support and continue efforts toward a defined specific market in which dollars spent will bring the greatest amount of return visitor dollars. The Vail Valley Marketing Board will make a presentation at the August 13th work session in regard to funding allocations and criteria for a special events selection committee. Additionally, they are aware they must demonstrate to the Council by March 31st, 1992, their effectiveness in the marketing and promotional program in order to satisfy the sunset clause in the ordinance mandating the business license marketing fee. 6. IMPLEMENT PARKING/TRANSPORTATION PLAN While the formal adoption of this plan has not occurred, the concepts have been presented to Council and there is consensus about the plan. Following Arnie Ullevig's presentation to Council in May, and taking into account certain budget implications, by early fall of 1991, this plan should have proceeded through the PEC/DRB process and should have received substantial public imput. Some recommendations from the plan have already been implemented, i.e., new parking fees, restructured East and West Vail bus routes, expanded hours of service for buses, and so on. Seen as desirable and included in the proposed 1992 capital expenditures budgets are the following: - 3 - New shuttle buses $100,000.00 Christiania loading dock $150,000.00 (planning documents) Simba Run Underpass $140,000.00 (planning documents) 7. THE ENVIRONMENT Staff is underway on research for a program to address existing woodburning fireplaces within the Town of Vail. Susan Scanlan has worked to prepare research for joint meetings with the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Vail Town Council. A discussion of the Town of Vail's road-sanding practices was scheduled in March for a PEC meeting, and in all efforts initiated by the Town, a strong public education component has been included. Kristan Pritz is in the process of hiring an environmental specialist for the Town of Vail, and the Council has been notified the process has gone into its third round of interviews. A second and final reading on the fireplace/air pollution control ordinance is set for the August 6th, 1991, Council meeting. 8. TEN-YEAR TREE PLANTING PROGRAM In the proposed capital expenditures budget for 1992, $10,000.00 has been itemized to initiate the first allocation for tree seedlings in a continuing ten-year program. The East Vail Interchange, scheduled for completion in the Fall of 1991, is actually in the final phase of flower planting and should be complete by August 16th. Work at the Main Vail Interchange, estimated at $159,000.00, is not currently proposed in the 1992 budget and has been deferred. - 4 - 1~ town of nail 75 south frontage road veil, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2116 MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Steve Barwick DATE: August 2, 1991 RE: 1992 Capital Projects Please find attached the staff's proposed list of capital projects for the 1992 budget. The projects are listed in priority order for both the Capital Projects Fund and the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund. These projects will be discussed with Council during Tuesday's work session. Please be prepared to provide staff with your questions, input, and directions at that time. SHB/ds 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS REQUIRED PROJECTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL 1 Parking Structure Landscape Contingency 30,000 30,000 2 Pave Ford Park & Left Turn Lane 481,074 481,074 3 Chapel Bridge Replacement 10,000 450,000 460,000 4 Berry Creek 5th (Debt Service Only) 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 TOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS 641,074 570,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 1,571,074 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS 1 Fire Truck 250,000 250,000 2 Town Shop Ventilation System 46,200 46,200 3 Communication System Mtce & Replacement 20,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 90,000 4 Vail Fire Station Storm Sewer 24,450 24,450 5 Slifer Fountain Repair 30,000 30,000 6 Miscellaneous Building Maintenance 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 7 Street Improvement Mtce Program 1,260,000 1,775,000 2,056,000 1,637,000 2,061,675 8,789,675 8 Parking Structure Capital Mtce Program 55,000 330,000 220,000 200,000 415,000 1,220,000 9 Rec Path Mtce Program 85,000 89,000 93,000 98,000 103,000 468,000 10 Bus Shelter Improvement & Replace 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000. 11 Drainage Improvements 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 12 Street Furniture Replacement 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 13 Police Building (Debt Service Only) 85,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 1,485,000 14 Town Shop and Bus Barn Mtce Program 390,000 370,000 400,000 375,000 600,000 2,135,000 15 Parking Structure Stair Tower Remodel 20,000 20,000 16 Remodel Bus Terminal 35,000 35,000 17 Computerization of Lionshead Parking 140,000 140,000 18 Street Light Improvement Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 19 Library Carpet 27,500 27,500 20 Additional Bus 200,000 200,000 400,000 21 Fire Extrication Equipment 16,000 16,000 22 Replace Buses 1,050,000 1,852,000 1,458,000 4,360,000 TOTAL ESSENTIAL PROJECTS 2,610,650 4,387,500 3,299,000 4,897,000 5,172,675 20,366,825 DESIRABLE PROJECTS 1 Implement New Shuttle Buses 100,000 200,000 1,500,000 1,300,000 3,100,000 2 Simba Run Underpass 140,000 70,000 2,340,000 2,550,000 3 Vail Valley Drive Pedestrian Connections 170,000 536,111 224,400 48,975 211,222 1,190,708 4 Meadow Drive Const Documents 66,000 66,000 5 Sidewalk Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 6 Christiania Loading Dock 150,000 650,000 2,250,000 3,050,000 7 Vail Road Medians & Sidewalk 191,444 191,444 8 Pulis Bridge Replace 330,000 330,000 9 Relocate Checkpoint Charlie 110,000 110,000 10 Siebert Circle ? p 11 Frontage Road Widening & Landscape Medians 593,782 593,782 12 Frontage Road Bike and Ped Path 144,966 144,966 13 Test Temporary Close 170 Ramps 60,000 292,000 352,000 14 West Vail Interchange Imp 170,000 370,000 540,000 TOTAL DESIRABLE PROJECTS 2,046,192 1,736,111 2,906,400 4,218,975 1,561,222 12,468,900 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 5.297.916 6.693.611 6.325.400 9.235.975 6.853,897 34.406.799 1992-1996 RETT PROJECTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL 1 Ford Park Snowdump Revegetation 10,000 10,000 2 Stephens Park Phase II 123,384 135,500 258,884 3 Ski Museum Park Site 105,410 105,410 4 Tree Planting Program 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 5 Bighorn Park Completion 26,310 26,310 6 Lionshead Tot Lot Access Paths 7,270 7,270 7 Landscape Main Vail Interchange 158,850 130,525 130,525 419,900 8 Dowd Junction Bike Path 339,334 585,913 925,247 9 Donovan Park 84,000 451,000 451,000 451,000 1,437,000 10 Vail Das Schone Bike Path 132,501 132,501 11 Ford Park Walkway And Path Lights 43,800 43,800 12 Bighorn Townhouse Revegetation 5,350 5,350 13 Frontage Road Landscape Medians 110,494 110,494 14 Buffehr Creek Tot Lot 18,000 18,000 15 Recreation Trail Master Plan 300,000 300,000 300,000 900,000 16 Landscape Improvement Plan 150,000 150,000 300,000 TOTAL RETT PROJECTS 962,209 1,074.432 891,525 911,000 911,000 4,750.166 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PARKING STRUCTURE PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKING STRUCTURE CAPITAL ASSET PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION LANDSCAPE CONTINGENCY FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 199.', 1994 1995 1996 i~RANO TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACAUISITIUN SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 30000 30000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 30000 30000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG FILL TOWN PROJECTS A COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATIGtd SUBMITTED BY: MIKE R%SE DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT .I'JILiON - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PP.OJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FORD PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION PAVE FORD PARK ALTERNATE N0.1 & LEFT TURN LANE ADJACENT TO FORD PARK FUND # AND TITLE: (1/2) 10-CAPITAL ~ (1/2) 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 70359 70359 LAND ACtdUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING R STREET 410715 410715 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 481074 481074 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMGNG ALL TOWN PROJECT§ - A COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ABOVE COST ASSUMES ONLY A LEFT TURN BAY ADDED TO FRONTAr,C. ROAD (SUBJECT 70 CGON APPROVAL). FORD PARK PARKING ALTERNATE N0. 2 & ACCEL/DECCEL/LEFT TURIJ L.ANF..S ADJACENT TO FORD PARK CO T fST[MATES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE FIGURES. ATTACtiEii AS BACKUP FOR DISCUSSION. SUBMITTED BY; GREG HALL DATE: 7/8/91 c PAVE FORD PARK ALTERNATE NO. 1 Shape Parking Area 7975 x 2 $ 15,950 Asphalt 1316 Tons x 45 $ 59,220 Core Island Curbs 750 x 8 $ 6,000 Curb & Gutter Landscaping 15,227 x 2 $ 30,454 Striping 3300 x .15 S 495 Subtotal $112,119 15$ - Mob., Traffic Control & Contingency $ 16,800 10$ - Engineering and Inspection S 14.000 Total $142,919 _.J LEFT TURN ~.ANE - ADJACENT TO FORD PARK Asphalt 1500 Tons $45/Ton $ 67,500 Base Course 2669 Tons $18/Ton $ 48,042 Unclassified 1578 CY $10/CY $ 15,780 Excavation Curb & Gutter 1680 LF $12/LF $ 20,160 Ditch ~ 1450 LF $1.50/LF $ 2,175 Utility Relocates 6 units Lump Sum $ 10,000 Sawcut 404~-LF $1/LF $ 4,040 Guardrail 400 LF $20/LF $ 8,000 Striping 8400 LF $.15/LF $ 1,260 Landscape Tie Ins. 24,240 SF $2/SF S 48.480 Subtotal $225,437 15$ - Mob., Traffic $ 56,359 Control & Contingency 10$ - Engineering S 56,359, and Inspections Total $338,155 ,.l FORD PARK P 2A~ KING ALTERNATE NO. 2, Asphalt 1519 Tons $45/Ton $ 68,355 Shaping 9202 SY $2/SY $ 18,404 Parking Landscape 27525 SY $2/SF $ 55,050 Culvert 200 LF $30/LF $ 6,000 Island Curb 600 LF $8/LF $ 4,800 Striping 4000 LF $.15/LF S 600 Subtotal $153,209 25$ - Mob., Traffic Control & Contingency $ 38,302 20~ - Engineering and Inspection S 38.3oZ, Total $229,813 ~CCEL/DECCEL/LEFT TURN LANES - ADJACENT TO FORD PARK Sawcut Asphalt 4040 x 1 $ 4,040 Excavation 1819 x 10 $ 18,190 Retaining Wall 2000SF x 30 $ 60,000 Asphalt 2146 Tons x 45 $ 96,570 (includes overlay) Base Course 2965 x 18 $ 53,370 Curb & Gutter 1680 x 12 $ 20,160 Landscaping 40,400 x 2 $ 80,800 Pitch 1450 x 1.5 $ 2,175 Utility Relocates L.S. $ 10,000 Storm Sewer 1800 x 30 $ 54,000 Inlets 7 x 2000 $ 14,000 Culvert 200 x 20 $ 4,000 Guardrail 400 x 18 $ 7,200 Guardrail Road 2 x 750 $ 1,500 Striping 3300 x .45 S x.485 Subtotal Range: $274,690 - $427,490 25$ - Mob., Traffic Range: $ 68,673 - $106,873 Control & Contingency 20$ - Engineering and Range; ~ 68.673 - 5106.873 Inspection Total Range: $412,036 - $641,236 Low end is without storm sewer & culverts TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT f~ROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: CHAPEL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION VAIL ROAD & GORE CREEK DRIVE. REPLACE SUBSTANDARD BRIDGE AND ADD ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN FACILITTES- FUND it AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL AND CDOH PROJECT t:OSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESJGN 1.0000 75000 85000 LANG ACQUISITION StTE, IANDSCAPINr, & STREET 375000 375000 DEVELOPMENTS fr IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 10000 450000 460000 PkOJ[CT FUNDING: 1G - CAPITAL AND CDOIi CDOH FUNDS 368000 TOWN Of VAIL CAPITAL 92000 TOTAL - 10 AND CDOH 10000 450000 460000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PP,07ECT AMONG ALL TOWN PRQTECTS - A COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION TOWN OF VAIL WILL APPLY FOR CDOH BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FUNDS THIS SEPTEMBER 1991 FOR THIS SUBSTANDARD BRIDGE. LAST OF THE SUBSTANUARD BRIDGES TO 8E REPLACED USING CDOH MFlTCM MONEY. SUBMITTED BY: r,REG HALL DATE: 7/8;91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION FIRE PROJECT STARTING DATE: 10/91. PROJECT TITLE: FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION GATE: 8/92 PROJECT DESCkIPTION AND LOCATION PURCHASE OF NEW PUMPER TO REPLACE THE PUMPER THAT WAS TOTALED ON VAIL PASS IN APRIL, 1990. FUND # AND TITLE: 1G - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 199A 19'I~ 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEAR:,) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACCIUIStTION SITE., L('~NDSCAPING & STREET DLV[:I i_rPHENTS ~ IMPROVEMENTS EOUI1'MEtdT PURCHASE 250000 250000 YEARLY TOTAL. 250000 250000 FUTURE REVENUE FP.OM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PRO.7ECTS - C?~ COMMEtdTS AND JUSTIFICATION CURRENTLY. WHEN A PIECE OF tiPPARATUS IS DGWt! FOR REf'A[RS, WE PUT OUR OLDCiT PUMPER, "1964" INTO CALL STATl1S. THIS Pl1MF'ER IS ONLY CGNSIDERED A PAkF~DE TRUCK. SUBMITTED OY: DICK DURAN GATE: 7/3/9L r TOWN OF VAIL - PRGPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - ALL DEPARTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE". TOWN SHOPS VENTILATION SYSTEM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION INSTALLATION OF VENTILATION SYSTEM AT TOWN SHOE';: FUND p AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 1200 1200 LAND ACQUISITION STTE, LANDSCAF'TNG & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT ' DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEII[NTS .45000 45000 YEARLY TOTAL 46?00 46200 FUTURE REVENUE FRGM PROJECT AMGNG ALL TOWN PROTECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION HEALTH I:,SUE AS WELL AS OPERATIONAL. AIR IS FREAUENTLY BAD (STAGNANT AND SMOKE-FILLED) IN GFFICES, FARTS ROOM AREA AND LUNCHROOM. ThiEf:E IS NO HEATING SYSTEM FoT THIS TIME. ENVIRONMENT IS ALWAYS DIRTY. EFFECTS OPERATIGN OF i~LL COMPUTER HARDWARE. SUBMITTED BY: GREG hIALL DATE: 7/6/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL. IMPROYEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION POLICC PROJECT STARTINr, DATE: 1;'1%92 PROJECT TITLE: COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PRCl7EC7 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31;92 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ONGOING REPLACEMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING PORTABLE AND MU[3ILE RADIUS. FUN[1 p AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 i)RAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNItJG/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVEU~PMENTS x. IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAYS 20000 15000 15000 20006 20000 90000 1'E„RLY TOTAL i 20000 15000 15000 20000 20000 90000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL. TOWN PROJECTS - B CGMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION THIS PROJECT COVERS ALL TOWN OF PAIL RADIUS AND THE RELATED COMMUNIG~TIOtJ3/MICROWAVE SYSTEM. SUE~MTTTED E;Y: KEN HUGtIEY DATE.: 7/P/91 1 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMI~'RUVEMENT PROJECT pEPARTMEPIT DIVI:;Ii:,N - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRAiJSPORTATIUN PROJEC:T STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: VAIL FIRE STATION STORM SEWER PROJECT COMPLETIijPf DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION hiF~IN VAIL FIRE STATION - SEE ATTACHMENT FUND N AfJD TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS L't"':: 19'?'3 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE `!EARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 4G?`• 4075 L-AND ACCTUISITTiit`! SITE, Lr1NDSCAFIN+] R STREET 2U3'S u 0 G 0 20.;75 DEVELOPMENTS f IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 2445(1 0 0 0 0 24450 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMGNG hLl TciWM PROJECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION G'ASED ON STORM DRAINAGE STUDY RECOMML_NDfiTIOPJS PC-R HULLER E1li~IiIEERING SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL Cil,TE: "1!8/91. ~ VAIL• F?'RE STATION STORM SEWER PROJECT COST ESTIMATE: BASED ON STORM DRAINAGE STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS PER HULLER ENGINEERING (SEE PLAN) ~~frj QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST Type 13 Sump Inlet 1 $2000 EA $ 2,000 4' Diameter MH 2 $1500 EA 3,000 8" PVC 130 LF $25/LF 3,250 Asphalt Patch 35 Tons $70/Ton 2,450 Remove Asphalt Mat 200 SY $ 3/Yd 600 Utility Conflicts LS $5000 5.000 Subtotal $ 16,300 25~ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 4,075 20$ (Design and Inspection) 4,Q75 Total ~ $ 24,450 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMEh!i f'Rr~~.TECT DF:Rr~RTMENT DTV'I~ti~N - PUDLIC WORKS PULLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PRu.]E:CT START1Nc3 DATE: f~RO;JECT TITLE: SLIFER FOUNTAIN REPAIR. PROTECT CUMPLETIOtd DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATLON REPAIR FOUNTAIN AT SLIFER F'Lf,1r1 FUND q AND TITLE: 10 - CF'~PITAL RP,OJECT COSTS 19")2 1993 1994 1995 199b GRAND TOTAL (FIVL YrARS) PLAflNI11G!DESICN 50(iii G 0 0 G 5000 L iiND Ai;c~U I S I T I ON ~[TE, LANDSr_APINr, 8 STREET 2501)0 D 0 0 0 25000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS E+UILDINr,, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 30000 0 0 D 0 0000 i FUTUR[ REVENUE FF;OM PROJECT AMGNG ALL TOWI1 PROJECTS - B COMMENT:,,OND JUSTIFICATION SLIFER PLAZA FOUNTAIN IS LEAKING AidD PLUME31'NG IS GO1N~~~. DF~If<E T!~ RETURt! FOUNTAIN TU ORIGINAL DLSIr~N. ;UE.HITTED C~Y: GREG BALL DATE:.: „8;91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - ALL DEPARTMENTS PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINr, MAINTENANCE PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL 'PRO.TECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVC- YEARS) PLANNING;DESIGN LAND AC9UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPINr, & STREET DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE ~ PLANT :0000 25000 251)00 25000 25000 150000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 50000 25000 25000 25000 25000 150000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR UNFORSEEN BUILDING EMERGENCY REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SUBMITTED BY: STEVE BARWICK DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTINr, DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STREET IMPPOVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION STREET IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - SEE ATTACHMENT FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 GRAND TOTAL (SIX YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 235000 265000 240000 244000 352000 250000 1586000 Lr1ND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 1025000 .1510000 1816000 1393000 1709675 1`?25D00 9378675 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 1260000 1775000 2056000 1637000 2061675 2175000 10964675 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION CONTINUES CURRENT ON-r;OING PROGRAM SUBMITTED EY: GREG HALL UATE: 7/8%91 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1992 ESTIMATED ROAD LENGTH COST Eagle's Nest Circle 225 $ 23,780 Homestake Circle 425 $ 44,918 Fairway Drive 900 $ 95,121 Fairway Court 170 $ 17,967 Hornsilver Circle 575 $ 60,772 Cabin Circle 275 $ 29,065 Ptarmigan Road 1825 $ 192,884 Spring Hill Lane 450 $ 47,561 Sunburst Drive 3550 S 286.734 Subtotal 8395 $ 798,802 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 225,000 Coating (Sandstone, Forest Rd.) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 159,760 Management Salaries and Testing 1992 (20$ - $40,000 in 1991) Engineering 1993 S 75,000 Total $1,258,562 OUT 1992 - Vail Valley Drive 7450 Mill Creek Circle 1700 (If no reconstruction is done in 1992, cut $798,802 plus $80,000 of the 1992 engineering plus $75,000 of the 1993 engineering, and add an additional $100,000 to the maintenance paving). Maintenance Paving $ 325 000 Engineering S 80 000 $ 405,000 GTRF.RT TMPR~VEMENTS - 1993 ESTIMATED $Q8Q LEA Bridge Road 625 $ 52,350 Nugget Lane 775 $ 64,915 Columbine Drive 2450 $ 205,210 Spruce Way 3500 $ 293,160 Spruce Drive 250 S 20,940 Streamside Circle 2250 $ 188,460 Meadow Drive 4300 $ 376,379 Juniper Lane 1400 ~ 122.542 Subtotal 15550 $1,333,956 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 175,000 Coating (Intermountain) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 189,791 Management Salaries and Testing 1993 Engineering 1994 S 75.000 Total $1,773,747 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1994 ESTIMATED 848Q LE~tSTH Lionaridge Loop 5300 $ 644,680 Buffehr Creek Road 6800 $ 826,880 Circle Drive 500 $ 60,800 Meadow Ridge Road 900 S 109.440 Subtotal 13500 $1,641,421 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 175,000 Coating (Booth Falls) Enginoarinq, Surveying, Construction $ 164,142 Management Salaries and T~ating 1994 (60~ Design Complota) Engineering 1995 S 75.000 Total $2,055,563 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1995 ESTIMATED $48Q LEI~ti COST Meadow Lane 950 $ 95,600 Gore Circle 1450 $ 145,915 Main Gore Drive 3200 $ 322,020 Kel-Gar Lane 600 $ 60,380 Black Gore Driva 1650 $ 166,040 Grouse Lane 525 $ 52,830 Ute Lane 275 $ 27,675 Snowshoe Lane 425 $ 42,770 Lupine Drive 2725 $ 274,220 Willow Way 300 $ 30,190 Main Gore Place 350 S 35220 Subtotal 12450 $1,217,640 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 175,000 Coating (Golfcourse) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 168,530 Management Salaries and Testing 1995 Engineering 1996 S 75.000 Total $1,647,840 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1996 ESTIMATED B.48p LE~iSiTH C9~T Greenhill Court 1050 $ 135,220 Westhaven Circle 3550 $ 457,175 Westhaven Drive 350 $ 45,075 Westhaven Lane 1120 $ 144,235 Alta Circle 175 $ 22,535 West Gore Creek Drive 2500 $ 322,955 Matterhorn Circle 2650 $ 341,270 Shasta Place 320 S 412,1.4 Subtotal 11715 $1,509,675 Maintenance Paving and Seal S 200,000 Coating (East Vail 1) Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 226,935 Management Salaries and Testing 1996 Engineering 1997 S 125.000 Total $2,061,610 STREET IMPROVEMENTS - 1997 ESTIMATED j COST Vail Valley Drive 7450 $ 790,805 (Frontage Rd. to Mill Creek Circle) Mill Creek Circle 1700 $ 229,300 Aspen Lane 750 $ 64,840 Aspen Court 220 $ 19,020 Booth Falls Driva 1400 S 121.030 Subtotal 11520 $1,224,995 Maintenance Paving and Seal $ 200,000 Coating overlay West Vail $ 500,000 Engineering, Surveying, Construction $ 199,510 Management Salaries and Testing 1997 Engineering 1998 S 50.000 Total $2,174,505 TOWN OF VAIL PkOP0~6D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECI DEPARTMENT DIVI~]ON - PARKING STRUCTUCtC PUBLIC WORKS%TRANSPORTATIOtJ PROJECT STARTItJG Df;Tf_: PROJECT TITLEI PARKING STRUCTURES CAPITAL ASSET MAINTCNANCE PROGRAM PRQ7f.CT COMPLETION DATE; PROJECT D[SCRIPTION AND LOCATION f'Af:KING STRUCTUF:E.S CE;PIT6;L ASSET M.<tTtJTCNANCE f'RuGRa;ti - SEI. AT1(aCll'riENT FUND p AND TITLE: 1G - CAPITAL f'RO.JECT COSTS 19'i2 .1.?`)3 1~'J4 1^. `i5 1.7?6 GRAND TOT;ZL ~ CIYE '(EAR;) PLANNING;DESIGN LAND ACOII[SITION SITE, LANDSCAF'It1G ~ STREET D[VELuPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS , BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEYELOPMF.NTS R IMPROVEMENTS 55000 ~~OOi)0 ^220D00 ^2ii0000 415000 1`220000 YFltkt.'r TC.TAL. 550D0 3.'.,Mii)G 220000 200000 415000 12200itU f l!1'URC F:EJEtlUE FR~rM F'RGJEi:T ,',iliii~li; ,,;.I_ CCrMMENTS ~1ND JUST I FICr'tT1UN ~:~iNT[D!UfS ~a1RRf:Ni ('RiaRAt1 :;UEthill TED EY: MIh;C R~Y;E [~~.<tTC. '%$/?t PARKING STRUCTURES CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE 1992 - 1996 1992 LH generator installation (emergency power) $ 15,000 Seal, joint repair and deck maintenance S 40.000 (VTRC lower levels) - Total $ 55,000 1993 Seal decks (LHTRC - 5 year) $ 100,000 HSP joints (top deck - LHTRC) $ 150,000 Seal, joint and control cracks (VTRC - $ 40 000 old 2nd level) Computerize West Day Lot S 40.000 Total $ 330,000 1994 VTRC Engineering Study Condition $ 20,000 Joint & crack control (LHTRC - 2nd north) $ 40,000 Light replacement (LHTRC) $ 100,000 VTRC lower level final phase (1st concrete) $ 40,000 Trash compactor (LHTRC) S 20.000 Total $ 220,000 199 Implement 1994 Condition Study of $ 100,000 VTRC repairs (most likely top deck seal and joints) Joint and crack control (LHTRC - 2nd south) $ 40,000 LHTRC concrete replacement S 60.000 (1st north & south) Total $ 200,000 1996 LHTRC Condition Study $ 15,000 Update parking equipment (VTRC & LHTRC) $ 100,000 Shotblast & seal decks (VTRC level 2 & S 300.000 LHTRC top level) Total $ 415,000 ' TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMFRUVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISIGN - PUEsLIC WOP.KS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPURTATiUN PROJECT 3iARTING DATE: PRQ7ECT TITLEi RECREATIONAL PATFIS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROJECT CUMPLLTIUN DA(E: PRUJ[CT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION RECREATION PATFIS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - SEE ATTACHMENT FUND ~ ANU TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PRCUECi COSTS 1?92 1993 1994 L995 1::>96 GRAiJD TOTAL (FIVE YEi;RS) F'LANNTFIC/DESIrN LAND AC9UISITIUN C[TE, I_,1NDSCAPING & STREET 85000 x39000 93000 9,-•DOD 10 000 468000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS eUI1.DING, STRl1CTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS R ]MPRUVEMENTS 'ff_riRL'f TOTAL :~50G0 89000 4~Oilu '~`.'iiOG lIJ2~00rJ 468000 FUTURE REVENUE fRUM PROJECT AMONG ALL (CrWN PRU.7ECT~ CUMMErdTS AND JU'TIFICATIUN CUtdTIP!UES Cl1RRENT FIVI=-YEAR [MPRUVr_MENT rr~r~:~P.Ai-i SUCMITTED BY: GREG hlAl_L DATE: 7/8;9.1. 1992 - 1996 BIKE PATH MAINTENANCE PLAN ITEM 133 3333 1994 1995 133 i PATCHING 26,300 30,300 34,300 39,300 44,300 OVERLAY 15, 000 15, 000 15, 000 15, 000 15,000 SIGNAGE 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 ROCK REMOVAL 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 VEGETATION CONTROL 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 CRACK SEALING 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 DRAINAGE IMPROVE. 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 SWEEPING 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 FILL AREAS 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 BARRICI?DES 1, 900 1, 900 1, 900 1, 900 1,900 REFLECTORS 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 ROCKFALL 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 STRUCTURAL IMPROVE. 7.000 •7.000 ~.OOQ 7.000 7.000 TOTAL/YEAR 85,000 89,000 93,000 98,000 103,000 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RROJFCf DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TRANSPORTATION F'ROJGCT TITLE: EUS SHELTER REPLACEMENT FROTEi~T STARTING DATE: AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROTECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACE 2 EXISTING ($10,000 EA. AND INSTALL 1 NEW BUS SMELTER ($20,000) EACH YEAR FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROTECT COST 1992 1993 1994 .1995 199E, GRAND TOTAL. (FIVE Y'EAP.S i PLANNING/DESIGN LAND AC9UISITION i SITE, LAt'!DSCAFING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE R PLANT 40000 40000 40000 4D000 40iJ00 2['i0000 DEVELOPMENTS & IHF'ROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 40000 40000 40000 10000 40000 200000 FUTUF.E REVENUE FF:GM PROJECT AMGNG ALI. TUWIJ FROJGCTS - D CUMMEDlTS AND JUSTIFICATION PAIL F_X(3TING SHELTERS ARE It! t•lECD OF REFLACEML'NT (I'URl,1lrl:iCU Ihl 1')001. r:PiRPENTGRS WILL. DE:T~RMINF ThIE WORST 2 EVERY YEAR TG FZEF'LACE. AN ADUITIC~NGiL fIEW II[I_TEf: WILL BE ADDED EVERY 'YEAR STARFINiJ WITII G'TARMIGAN STGR IN WEST VAiI_ TN I'?^ LOl'..iITTONS FUR. r`iDDITIUflr1L :,HF_LTERS (1'??. - i'~9~i WILL Ft E. DETERMItdED AT A LAIER DATE. ' SUBMITTED BY: FJREG HALL DATE: ?/3/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT ~IVI'aION - FUF3LIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTINr, DATE: PROJECT TITLE: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT COMFLETIGN DATE: FF2OJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION VAk1UUS LOCATIONS AS IDENTIFIED IN VILLAGE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. FUND p AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 .1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 25000 LANG ACBUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 25000 45000 45000 45000 45000 205000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 30000 50000 50000 50000 50000 230000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ~ TOWN PROJECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION CURRENTLY WE I1AVE '59000 BUDGCTF.D IN GENERAL FUND FOR DRAINAGE MATERIALS. THIS ONLY COVERS [3ASIC DRFiINFiGE MAINTENANCE AND MINOR IMPROVEMENTS. MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN FIAS OUTLINED MANY PROJECTS WFIICH WE HF,VE KNOWN ABOUT AS DRALtJAr,E CONCERNS, BUT ALL OUR PROBLEMS HADN'T BEEN PUT TOGETHER COMPREHENSIVELY TO EVALUATE OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS IN CAPITAL BUDGET. COST TO REPAIRING ANO IMPROVING DRAINAGE F~kOBLEMS 7USTIFI[S YEARLY CAPITAL ACCOUt!T TO BE SET UP. SUBMITTED BY: r,R~r, HALL DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTINr, DATC: PROJECT TITLE: STREET FURNITURE IMPROVEMENTS FR0.TEi;T r:OMPLGTION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION itDDITIONS AND REPL_ACEMENT3 TO PARK BENC!IES, DIKE R;tCt:S AND BENCHES FUtdD N AtdO TITLE: 10 - CAFITAI.. F'Ri~7ECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 t?95 L9~f, i;RAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) F'Lr,!!r!itl~i%DESIGtd LrltlD Ai: cjU 13I T ION S[T[, I_r1ND~CAPiih; 4 STREET 20000 20000 .000ti^0000 2Gi)UO 160000 CJEVELC.tPME14T~• 1MFROVEMENTS ,~IIILDINU, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELirF'MFt1TS E~ IMPROVEMENTS 'fEARI_Y TOTAL 20600 20066 2006(1 20600 20600 100000 FLITUF:[ REVENUE FN,OM FRC>.7ECT AMONG ALL TUWN PROJECTS - B C!iP!MEP!T~ AND JUSTIFICATION tiDD F, I?CPIACE r'+NNUALLY: 5 BENCHES AT $1250 EA. PI~':NIr: ftENCI1Ew i1 f :61 500 C-A, 7 DIKE RACK ~ i'~ L y`)fi0 EA. SUDMITTED BY: GREG FIALL DATE: 7!8.">1 ~ ' TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - ALL DEPf,RTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: TOWN SHOPS AND BUS BARN CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM PROTECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRJPTIOtd AND LOCATION TOWN ShIOPS ANO BUS f'ARN CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM - SEE F;TTACHMENT FUND S AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1.9'35 1996 GRAhlD TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) F'LANNING,~DESIGN 30000 30000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & ~TREE7 OEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS EUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS 360000 37000p 400000 375000 1,00000 :105000 YEARLY TOTAL. 390000 370000 400000 375000 600000 2135000 FUTUN,E REVfiNIIE ~RUhi f"'F'G•IEGT AHONG AI_L TOWN PROJECTS - Es CGMMENTS AND JUSTIFICF~TION CONTINUE: t;URRF_NT FP~E-YEAR IMPROVEMENT !'ROGRAM SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN SHOPS CAPITAL ASSET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 1992 - 1996 199,, Design $ 30,000 Furnishings $ 30,000 Enlarge Administration Building $ 300,000 (1000 sq. ft. - storage, file room, copy room) (2000 sq. ft. - bus driver's lockers, showers, storage and offices) Contingency S 30.000• Total $ 390,000 1993 Construct bus barn bay extensions $ 120,000 to accommodate 35' or 40' buses (40 buses)* Construct two additional operating S 250.000• bays (1250 sq. ft. each) Total $ 370,000 * Anticipating purchasing longer buses in 1993 in accordance with Master Transportation Plan. 1994 Retrofit building exteriors, plumbing S 400.000 H~IAC and electrical Total $ 400,000 1995 Construct two additional operating $ 250 000 bays (1250 sq. ft. each) Install fire sprinkling system (shops) $ 95,000 Install retaining wall - shops tunnel S 30.000 Total $ 375,000 1996 Provide inside storage (may be opted out if new Butler building is built soon•~r) Storage Building $ 300,000 Two (2) Operating Bays S 300,000 Total $ 600,000 Six (6) Operating Bavs 1 - Conrad (Bldg. Maint.) 1 - Electrical 1 - Public Works 1 - Carpenters 1 - Welding 1 - Sign Shop/Gate Arms TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKING STRUCTURE PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKING STRUCTURE CAPITAL ASSET PRQ7ECT r_OMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION STAIR BUILDING REMODCL FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LANG AC®UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET ' DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS 20000 20000 YEARLY TOTAL 20000 20000 FUTURE RF`JENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - B COMM[.t1T~ AND JUGTIFICATIOtl SU(3MIITED BY: MIKE Ri)SE DATE: 7/f3/91 TOWN GF VAIL PROPG~ED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJCCT DEPARTMENT DIVI3IOM - PARKING STRUCTURE PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKING STRUCTURE r.APITAL ASSET PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION BUS TERMINAL RETROFIT FUND A AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PRr~,TCCT COSTS 1'792 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEAitS) PLANNING/DESLGN LAND ACBUISI7ION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS 35000 35000 YEARLY TOTAL 35000 35000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: MIKE ROSE GATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKING STRUCTURE PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: PARKING STRUCTURE CAPITAL ASSET PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION COMPUTERIZE LIONSHEAD PARKING E9UIPMENT FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL. PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1974 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL iFIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND AC9UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMCNTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE 8 PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS 140000 140000 YEARLY TOTAL 140000 140000 ("UTURE RCVENUE FROM PROTECT AMO~lG ALL TOWN! PRGJECT~ - B CGMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: MIME ROSf_ DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DCPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS PUDLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT S(AR.TING DATE: PRUJEt:T TITLE: STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PRtjt',ftAM PROJECT ~.;i.)MPL;:.T[ON DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION STP.EET LIGFIT IMPROVEMENT PRC1GFtFtM - SEE ATTACHMENT Ff.Jtl0 tl FtND TI1L.E: 10 - CAPITAL I?R~aTEC ( COSTS 1.992 1993 1'?9d 1.995 1')9L t;RANU TOTAL (FIVE YEt~RS ) F'l ANNINC;/DESIGN LAND l1COUISITIOII :>I fE, L.r1NOSCAPiNG & :,TREET .'.0000 0000 30000 0(ii)0 'GU00 15(1000 Ilf '•!i: I t:~PMENT 3 8 I MPROVEHCNTS (?UILDIiIf;, STRUCTURE R PLANT fJEVELOF'MFNTS & IMPROVEMENTS YFr1RLY TOTAL 0000 30000 .',f100i) ;01000 :,0000 15D000 Fl1TURE RCVENUE FRGM PROJECT FtMOtdG ALL TUWN PROJC-CT^; - B- COI'iME.111S APJD JII~TIFIC~tT1C~t! CONT[PlUCS CURREf1T FI'+'E-YFt1P [MPROV(:MCNT f'(:G+RAt1 `.~ULiMI TTEO BY: DREG HALL GATE: B,~'~I. c TOWN OF V7?IL STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PLAN 199a - 1996 j992 - East Meadow Drive (across from Sonnenalp) (Z R) - Bighorn Road T.C.) - Founder's Plata (1 R) East Meadow Drive (across from Mountain Haus) (Z R) + Eight street lights in conjunction with East Vail Street Isprovements . 1993 Locations per Str®etscape Plan 122! Locations per Stre~tscape Plan 122 Frontage Road Lights VTRC - Lionshead 1996 Frontage Road Lights VTRC - Lionshead LEGFSI~ R - Village Core Street Light TC -Town and Country Street Light LHM - LionsHead Mall Street Light SITE SELECTION CRITERI71: 1. Public Safety Bus Stops Pedestrian Travel Areas Parka 2. Intersections o! major collector streets ` TOWN OF VAIL PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION LI2kARY PROJECT STARTING Urt'TE: PROJECT TITLE: CARPET REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETIODI DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACEMENT OF CARPET IN LIE:RAkY AND COMMUNITY ROOM. MOVING OF STACKS BY PUOLIC WORKS, INSERTING CONDUITS OENEATN iHl: CARPET FOR GAOLING. FUND 1E AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITiIL PROJECT COSTS 1 ~9? L%').'. 1??4 1995 1?96 DRANO TiITAL (FIVE YEARS) PL;~NNING/GESI~N LAhID ACC~U I S I T I Ot! SITE, L.ANDSCAF'IN~~ 8: STREET DE'JEt_OPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS f,UfLUIPIG, STRUCTURE & F'Lr,NT 27500 27500 UEVEI.OPMENTS F. IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 27500 21500 FUTUR: REVEtdUE FRGM F'RGJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - L COi1MENTS AND JUSTIFICFtT1Ghi 1.?2,';riU (.CARPET), '53,000 (MOVING ST;^d;KS/ELECTRICAL AND MANUAL L.ABOR), S'1,000 (CONDUIT:, ADDED). THE CARF'ETINi hIAS BEEN WORN OUT F,Y MANY USERS. ONE HAY OE AELE TO PUT TFiJS OFF TILL 5/93, GUT CERTAINL`f NO LONr;ER. LIL?BABY AtdD COMMUNITY RG~M INCLUDED. SUOhifTTED BY: ANNE FUX DATE: 7/II/91 " VAIL VILLAGE CARPETS 2077 N. iRONTAGE Rp. VAIL„ COLORADO 81657 (309) 4761906 March 18, 1991 Ms. Jan Gardner Vail Public Library 292 W. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Deas Jan: we are pleased to present our proposal for the replacement of carpeting at the library as discussed. Included with this proposal ark samples of the four products we are recommending. All are products that are , well-suited to this application as they are solution-dyed which renders them colorfast and exceptionally stain-resistant and all are of tight construction to withstand heavy traffic. Exact specifications are listed on each of the folders. The prices noted include carpet, freight, tearout of existing carpet and installation. We have not included furniture move in the pricing as we suggest you use volunteer labor or public works for this purpose. It will be considerably less costly than paying the hourly rate of carpet installers. We also have not included the cost of cutting around the tall stacks. We have had each of our installation crews look at the .project and it is their unanimous opinion that to do so will not produce a quality installation and will result in multiple seams in high-traffic areas. The four carpets and their installed prices are as follows: Philadelphia BRIDGESTONE $22,579.69 Philadelphia CAPITAL $19,453.49 Blue Ridge PARK LANE $22,451.80 Blue Ridge TREMONT II $21,386.05 We appreciate the opportunity to bid on this project and will be happy to provide additional samples or information if you so desire. Very truly yours, Arlys Terry and Jim Sanborn i r . , " j `9 r al TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: ADDITIONAL BUS PURCHASE i PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION PURCHASE ONE ADDITIONAL BUS IN 1993 ANO 1995 FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACBUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BLDG. STR. & PLANT 0 200000 0 200000 0 400000 DEVELOPMENT & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 0 200000 0 200000 0 400000 , FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - D COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION ADDITION TO BUS FLEET TO AILUW EXPANSION OF SERVICE. DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY INFLATION FACTOR. BUSES ARE SIMILAR TO CURRENT FLEET, NOT NEW lOW FLOOR HIGH C(-tPACITY BUSES. SUBMITTED BY: BILL LINFIELD DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN ~~F `J(11L PRUPU~ED CAPITAL INPROVEMEhIT PROJECT DEPfiRTMENi DTVI~IGN FIRE PROJECT STARTING DATE:. PROJECT TITLE: EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION PURCHASE OF NEW AMKUS EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT TO BE. PUT IN SERVICE AT STATION I. FUPlD q AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1.995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING a STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 16000 16000 ' YEARLY TOTAL ~ 16000 16000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS B COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICF~TIGN c~Ul? i~NLY HC(1VY RESCUE FQUIPhfENi [S Gtl ENr,INE A1.2, WNTCIi IS Ai STATION hf PGR RUNT{]NG TILE PA'.5.. WE WGULG LIKE TG F'URChIASE 1tiE SAME FUR ~TATIGN I. SUBMITTED BY: OiCK OURAN OATS: 7/8/91 - ~ TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED C~4FITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION TRAN:iFORTATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PRC~7ECT STARTING DATE: PRCQECI TITLE: BUS P.EFLACEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCAT]UN REPLACE WGRN OUT TRANSIT BUSES FUND q NND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 199E. GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACBUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS 8 IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE ~ PLANT 0 1050000 G .1852000 1458000 4360000 DEVELOPMENTS 8 IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 0 1050000 0 1.352000 1453000 43600D0 FUTUP.E REVENUE FROM PROJECT 30000 50000 60000 50000 180000 AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - D COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICAT]ON CONTINUE P,Cf I_ACEMEP{'f Of WORN-OUT BUSES REVENUE IS FROM SALE OF RCPLACCD BUSES SUBMITTED BY: BILL LTNFIELD GATE: ?/7/'?1 - & TGWI~ OF VAIL ' Bus Replacement Schedule ITEM 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 REPLACE 3 - 1979 BUSES 650000 REPLACE 2 - 1981 BUSS 400000 REPLACE II - 1981 BUSES 1852000 REPLACE 1 - 198? BUS 243000 REPLACE 5 - 1981 BUSES 1215000 TOTAL. BUS COSTS 1050000 0 1fs52000 1458000 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY' INFLATION FACTOR DOES NOT INCLUDE CHANCING TO LOW FLOOR HIGH CAPACITY BUSES (VAIL TRANSPORTATION (?LAN ESTIMATES THIS COST TO BE 27.5 MILLION, VS. 24.36 MILLION SHOWN) TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION RQTECT STARTING GATE: PROJECT TITLE: MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW SHUTTLE BUSES FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1?94 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 100000 0 0 100000 100000 300000 LANG AC9UISITION :,ITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 0 200000 0 1400000 1200000 2800000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDINr,, STRUCTURE 8. PLFlNT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS Y[ARLY TOTAL 100000 200000 0 1500000 1300000 3100000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - C COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION i NG. 5 RECOMMENDATION FROM MASTER TRANSPORTATION STUDY. TOWN'S SHUTTLE BUSES STAP.T TO BE REPLACED IN 1993. ALLOWS DEVELOPMENT GF PROTOTYPE IN 192/1993 AND ACBUISITION IN 1.995/1996. WILL APPLY TO UMTA FOR A SECTION 3 GRANT FOR MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TO SYSTEM. INCLUDES PURCHFl~E OF 1 BUS IN 1993, 7 IN 1995 AND 6 IN 1996. ~r,OSTS ARE INCREMENTAL ABOVE REPLACEMENT BUS COSTS). SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: 7/8/91 ' • TiiWN OF Vl1IL - F'ROf'OSED CiiPITi1L IMPROVEMENT f ROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUEiLIC NGRKS/TRANSPORTATION F'ULLIC WOfIKS!TRftTlSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE! Mr1STER 'fRr'iN;iPORTATIOPI PLAN JMhI_EMENTATION PROJECT COMPIETIUiJ DATE: PROJECT DESCRIF'TJUP! Ai~!D LOCATIOtd ~JMGi'~ RUIJ UNUEF:F'~; FUh10 N AND iITLE: 10 - CfiF'ITP~L. I''RQTEC'i i;OSTS i L9?3 I`194 1.996 1.'>:~~: f";ItFiPlD TOTAL (FIVE YEARS ) PLP.N~!INC/GES1,N 140000 70000 215000 4250G(i LAfl0 :ii:ClU i 3I T I~::N ':ITF, L;INOSCAPI~U1 & :;i!~,CCf 0 0 21:':5000 0 0 21250(]0 GEVEI_OPHENTS IMPRc;!'vI i~fENT CUILOIN(]. STItUi:IURE PLi'~tlT ' DEVELUi'MENT rk 1tfPF:ir1'ETIENT YEARLY TOTAL 1100u0 70000 340000 0 0 2550000 rUl'URE (?f":'FNU~-. i'F2!M F'F:~~I;..CT AMCrN!J i1 U_ T(1Wi`! PRO.IC~:.T:> i'. ~.OMi!~i!!~ AtlCi .Tl!.:TIF1Ci~llgl! il~). R!"~:~JriMEr'!Or'~TTGPI IRCfI Mit:ili.R TPPitl:~f'C'RTi1T](iN 'iTt1UY. AG'I'LY TO CDuI; I~H: 1'UiJDIN~3. `.:!JEMI fTCD Et l'. CF(E~1 I1f~LL D('~TE: 7,'O,"'.! r UNDERPASS SIMBA RUN Construction Costs $ 1,700,000 Construction Contingency - 25$ 425,000 Design and Construction Mgmt., Testing 425.000 and Staking - 20$ Total $ 2,550,000 TOWN OF PAIL PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: , 'ROJECT TITLE: VAIL VALLEY DRIVE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS PRr~?ECT COMPLETION DATE: 'ROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION MF'IEMENT VARIOUS STAGES OF STREET~CAPE PLAN UND q AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL 'RO.TECT COSTS 1992 1993 1.'394 19'75 1'96 GRAND TOTAL ( f TVC YEARS) CANNING/DESIGtJ 24309 8604;, 21400 8163 3520 17511E ANG ACQUISITIc~N 24000 20000 96000 140fi00 PTE, LANDSCF~PItTG rs STREET 1?1691 4301168 107000 4081? 17LU21 875592 'EVELOPMENT~ IMnROVEMF.NTS UILDING, STRUCTURE R PLANT ~E'YIOPMENTS & [MPR~iVEMF-.tlTS . 1_ARL`f TOTAL 170000 516111 ^.2441)0 48975 211222 1190708 UTUf?E REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMGNG ALL. TOWN PROJECTS - C GMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION MPLEMENTAiI~)N OF PIIASE I IN 1992 - PHASE II 8. III IN 1993 - PHASE IY IN 1`)94 - PHASE V IN 1995 PHASE VI IN 1996. UBMITTED BY: CP,EG FIALL. PATE: 7/1./91 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE Z WEST SIDE VAIL TRANSPORTATION CENTER - GARDEN OF THE GODS ' Total R.O.W. 150 X 8 @ $20/SF $ 24,000 Remove Existing Concrete Walk and Curb at Vail Athletic Club b Bridge 260 LF @ $10/LF 2,600 Saw Cut Asphalt 200 + 200 + 200 X 1 600 Remove Asphalt 5 X 200 + 12 X 200 3400/9 X 3 1,133 Pour New Curb b Gutter 300 X 12 3,600 Install New Walk/Esc./` ' Base Course $8/SF 300 X 8 X 8 19,200 Prep b Install New Concrete Pan 150 X 10 x 34 5,670 9 Tie in Parking Spaces $200/Space X 10 2,000 Asphalt Patch Back 450 X 2 X 550 X 65 1,788 18,000 Landscaping 450 X 2 X 2 1,800 'Modify Inlets 2 X 1000 ,000 Subtotal S 40,391 25@ (5$ Mobilization, 5@ Tratlic Control and 15$ Contingency) 10,098 2Q@ (Design, Construction Management, and lo.o9e Salaries) Total Construction $ 60,587 Grand Total $ 84,587 Need as a Minimum Curb b Gutter East Side Garden ot~the Gods to ~ Bridge - Walk Would be Preferred. Remove Temporary Curb 50 LF X 2 $ 100 ' Remove Asphalt 3000/9 X 3 1,050 Vail Valley Drive -Phase I Page 2 Saw Cut Asphalt 250 X 2 X 1 500 Clearing & Grubbing 1,000 Relocate Utilities, Hydrant, Street Lights, Cable T.V. 10,000 Pour New Curb & Gutter 250 X 12 3,000 " Install New Walk/Exc./ Base Course 250 X 6 X 8 12,000 Tie in Parking Spaces 5 X 200 1,000 Asphalt Patch Back 250 X 2 X 55o X 65 993 18,000 Rebuild Planters 30' X 10' + 50' X 10' 100 LF X 2 X 40 120 LF X 2. X 40 8000 + 9600 17,600 Prepare & Irrigate Beds 30 X 10 + 50 X 10 X $8/SF 6,400 Other Landscaping 150 X 4 X 2 1,200 Modify Inlets 2 X 1000 x.000 Subtotal $ 56,843 258 (Mobilization, Traffic Control and • Contingencies) 14,211 208 (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 14.211 Total $ 85,265 VAIL VALLEY DRIV& - PHASE II WEST AND EAST SIDE MUST BE COMPLETED TOGETHER Garden of the Gods South and East - 425 i R.O.W. 50 X 10 + 100 X 5 X 20 $ 20,000 Remove Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 425 LF X $10/LF 4,250 Saw Cut Asphalt 700 X 1 700 Remove Asphalt 350 X 12 + i50 X 2 + 125 X 8 X 3 1,833 9 Pour New Curb and Gutter 675 X 12 8,100 ' Install New Brick Walk 350 X 8 + 150 X 8 X 8 32,000 Prep and Install New Concrete Pan 100 X 10 X 34 3,780 9 Tie in'Parking Spaces 7 X 200 1,400 Modify Inlets 4 X 1000 4,000 Install Culvert ~ 50 X 30 1,500 Asphalt Patch Back 675 X 2 X x,50 X 65 2,681 18,000 Install Concrete Walk 275 X 6 X 34 6 233 9 ~ Clearing & Grubbing 1,000 Utility Modifications 5,000 Landscape Tie Ins. 775 X 4 X 2 6,200 Landscape Improvements 50 X 100 X 6 34.000, Subtotal $ 108,677 25~ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 27,169 Vail Valley Drive - Pha~a II Page 2 20$ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 27.1 Total $ 163,015 Grand Total $ 183,015 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE III GOLD PEAK TO ATHLETIC FIELD SOUTH SZDE PLUS WALK MANOR VAIL TO FORD PARK ENTRY Saw Cut Asphalt 1600 X 1 $ 1,600 Remove Asphalt 1600 X 2 X 3 1,067 9 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1425 X 12 17,100 Concrete Pan 175 X 8 X 4 5,600 Concrete Walk 750 X 6 X 4 18,000 Asphalt Patch Back 750 Flo + a5o ~4 X 550 X 65 21,650 18,000 Base Course ~Q,.90o X .5 X 140 X 18 6,867 2000 Prep Patch ~Q.900 X 2 2,422 9 Excavation ]50 X 1 X iJ 5,000 27 Utility Conflicts 20,000 Ciaarinq~& Grubbing 5,000 Removal of Structure and Obstacles 5,000 Retaining Wall 600 X 4 X 30 72,000 ,1 Storm Sewer Improvements 500 X 30 15,000 Inlets 3 @ 2000 6,000 Driveway Tie Ins 6 @ 200 1,200 ' Landscape Tie Ins 1600 X 10 X 2 3.000 Subtotal $ 235,496 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 58,874 20$ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 58.874 Total $ 353,244 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE IV SOUTH SIDE VAIL ASSOCIATES PARKING LOT - GOLD PEAK R.O.W. 600 X 8 X 20 $ 96,000 Remove Existing Concrete 790 X 2 1,500 Remove Existing Asphalt ,Z,SO X 12 X 3 3,000 9 Saw Cut Asphalt 750 X 2 X 1 1,500 Pour Concrete Curb & Gutter 700 X 12 8,400 Install Brick Walk 750 X 8 X 8 48,000 Tie in Parking Spaces 26 X 200 5,200 Landscape Tie In 750 X 8 X 2 12,000 Modify Inlets 3 X 1000 3,000 Utility Modifications a.ooo Subtotal $ 85,600 25~~(Mobilization, Traffic Control and ~ Contingency) 21,400 20$ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 21,400 Total $ 128,400 Grand Total $ 224,400 yAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE V VAIL TRANSPORTATION CENTER - FRONTAGE ROAD Saw Cut Asphalt 400 X 1 $ 400 Remove Concrete 200 X 5 1,000 Remove Asphalt 400 X 6 X 3 800 9 Pour Curb 400 X 12 4,800 6' Concrete Walk 4Q0 X 6 X 4 9,600 9 Guard Rail 250 X 15 3,750 Modify Inlets 4 X 1000 4,000 Asphalt Patch Back 400 X 4 1,600 Landscape Tie In 400 X 4 X 2 3,200 Utilities 3,000 Driveway Tie In 1 X 500 5oq Subtotal $ 32,650 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 8,162 2b~ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) a-~ TOtal $ 48,975 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE VI BRIDGE TO VAIL TRANSPORTATION CENTER EAST SIDE Modify Bridge $ 75,000 Tie Walk to Vail Transportation Canter Curb i Gutter 100 X 12 12,000 Walkway 100 X 6 X 4 2,400 Landscape Tie In 100 X 2 200 Saw Cut, Removal 100 X 2 200 Asphalt Patch Back 100 X 4/25 a24 Subtotal $ 79,400 25~ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 19,850 tot (Design, Construction Managemen~ and Salaries) 19.850 Total $ 119,100 VAT L• V LLEY DRIVE - PHASE VI NORTH SIDE OF FORD PARK ENTRY TO NATURE CENTER Saw Cut Asphalt 475 X 1 $ 475 Remove Asphalt 475 X 2 X 3 317 9 Pour Concrete Curb i Gutter ~ 475 X 12 5,700 Pour Walk 475 X 6 X 4 11,400 Prep Patch 475 X 2 X 2 210 9 Prep Back 475 X 4 X 550 X 65 3,774 18,000 Base Course 42,5 X 6 X 5.5 X 140 X 18 1,795 2,000 Landscape Tie In 475 X 4 X 2 3,800 . Subtotal $ 27,471 25~ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 6,868 20~ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 6,868 Total $ 41,207 VAIL VALLEY DRIVE - PHASE VI NORTH AND EAST SIDE - MANOR VAIL FRONTAGE Saw Cut Asphalt 1000 $ 1,000 Remove Asphalt 250 X 9 X 3 750 9 Prep and Install Par 250 X 4 X 34 3,780 9 Install Curb & Gutter 750 X 12 9,000 Asphalt Patch Back 1900 X 4 7,600 Landscape Tie In 750 X 4 X 2 6,000 Driveway Tie Ins 4 X 200 800 Modify Inlets 2 X 1000 2,000 Install Guard Rail 200 X 15 3.000 Subtotal $ 33,930 25~ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 8,482 20~ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) x.483 Total $ 50,915 TOWN OF NAIL - PF.OPGSED CAPITr1L [MPROVErfENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORMS/TRANSPORTATIGN PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MEADOW DRIVE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROJECI" COMPLETION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCAT]UN PREPARE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR WEST MEADOW DRIVE - LIOMSIIE.AD TO VAIL. ROAD. FUND A ArJD TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1!'? 1'? 1 ~ ~4 1995 1 i'?6 rrr~r~o TOl AL (PING YEr1RS j F'LANNRUIDES]GN r,i,00i! 6600G LAND ACG~UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDIr1G, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YCARL'Y TOTAL 66000 66i)GO FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL ii:,WN hf,c)JECTS - C CGFiME'11TS ANG JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: GREG H(1lL GfiTL. 7.r'~%91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT' DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT TITLE: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 1,000 LINEAR FEET OF SIDEWALK IN VARIOUS AREAS WITHIN THE TOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REC TRAILS PLAN, VAIL VILLAGE MASTER FLAN, URBAN DESIGN GUIDE FLAN AND SPECIAL COUNCIL REQUESTS. FUND # AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 DEVELOPMENTS a IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 250000 FUTURE REVENUE FRGM PROJECT AMONG ALI. TOWM PROJECTS - r COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: r;P.EG HALL DATE: 7/8/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMCNTATION PRU.TEt:T COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION CHRI~TIANIA LOADING DOCK FUND N AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS 19'): 19?3 1994 1995 1996 ~~RAND TOTAL (FIVE YLARS) PLANtdING/DESIGN 150000 150600 0 125000 425000 LAND ACQUISITION 500000 560000 SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 0 0 0 2125000 U 2125000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDINr,, STRUCTURE & PLANT OEV[LOPMENFS A IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 1.50000 LSOiiOU U 225000(1 0 3050000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - C COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICA71ON N0. 2 RECOMMENDATION FROM MASTER TR.;1D!SPORTATION SiljfiY. if:'f ET UI' [MRROVEMI_Ni DISTRICT FOR PRIVriTF: FUidOS. SUBMITTC.U BY: r~REC HALL. DATE. "'.1:;,'91 CHRISTIANIA LOADING DOCK Construction Costs $ 1,700,000 Construction Contingency - 25$ 425,000 R.O.W./Land Ownership 500,000 Design and Construction Mgmt., Testing 425.000 and Staking - 20$ Total $ 3,050,000 TOWN OF NAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVCM~NT PROJECT DCPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS FUBL.IC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PRUTE(:T TITLE: VAIL ROAO MEDIANS AND SIDEWALK PftC~.7ECT COMF'LETIOf•I GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION COriPLETE PROJECT EOTH SIDES OF ROAD FROM FRONTAGE ROAD TO MEADOW DRIVE fUND it AND TITLE: 1.0 - CAPITAL. PR(~.7ECT COSTS L:~9~ L993 19`)4 1995 I'~9f, i.;kl'~NU TOTi1L (PING- YEARS) PLAilfllrlG; DESIGrI 3190;' '190° Li;ND ACAUISITION 3[TC, LANDSCAPING & STREET 10`130 159530 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENf~ EU(LDING, STRUCTURE 3~ PL(1rIT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENT:: YEf(RLY TOTAL 191444 191~i44 FUTl1RE REVENUE FROM f'RC~JECT AMONG ALL 104Ji•J PROJECTS - C ~~:i:iMMEr1TS ((ND 7U~TIFICAT]ON SUBMITTED BY: r,REG HALL DATF: i;r/9I. VAIL $QAD M~Q~NS AND SIDEWALK COMPLETE PROJECT BOTH SIDES OF ROAD FROM FRONTAGE ROAD TO MEADOW DRIVE Saw Cut Asphalt 800 LF X 1 $ 800 Remove Asphalt 434 SY X 3 1,302 Remove Concrete Amoco 40 SY X 2 80 Clearing & Grubbing LS 2,000 Removal Structures & Obstructions LS 5,000 New Curb & Gutter 445 LF X 12 5,340 Island Curb 235 X 6 1,410 Concrete Pan 80 SY X 34 2,720 New Walk 3220 SF X 8 25,760 New Inlet 2 EA X 2000 4,000 Storm Sewer Pipe 40 LF X 30 1,200 Modify Inlet 1 EA X 1000 1,000 Asphalt Patch 49 Tons X 65 3,185 Asphalt'(Overlay) 168 Tons X 45 7,560 Store~Planters 650 SF X 30 19,500 Prep Planters 892 SF X 6 5,352 Landscape Tie Ins 3960 X 2 7,920 Lights 6 X 3000 18,000 Trees 15 X 300 4,500 Striping & Arrows LS 1,000 Amoco Planter Modification LS X 10,000 10.000 Subtotal $ 127,629 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 31,908 20~ (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 3.908 ' Total $ 191,444 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL 1Mf'ROVEMENT PROJECT DEPAF~TMENT DIVLSIGPI - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROTECT STARTINr, DATA: PROJECT TITLE: PULIS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION REPLACE PULIS BRIDGE AT VAIL VALLEY DRIVE FUND >s AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PR0.7ECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ijP.AND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNItIG/DESIGN 30000 30000 LAND i1CE~lUISIT~ON • CITE. LAtlp$f.API1Jr; 11 STREET 300000 300000 [iEb'EL!:iF'Mf.NTS & IMPROVEMENTS BU1LD[N~~. STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELCrPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS Yf_ARL''( TOTAL 3~Gijij0 330000 FUTURE F.EVENUE FROM PRCGJECT AMOiIi~ ALL TOWt! PI"tCUECTS - C COI'iMENTS> AND JUSTIFIC(tT1ON f3t:]D~~E IS NOT F.I_IOIBI.E FOR ~;f?frPlT ASSISTANCE BUT RECIUIRE~ 4JIUCPIIN~)J A3 fi Ma;IOR COLLECTi)R ANO BUu F:~-iUTE_ W1 LL TRY TO CONVINCE CDUH FOR SOME ASSISTANCE AS IT IS A TF;F~FFIC i:FtFETY IiA;P,RO. :>Ut?hf I1 TEO BY: GREG HALL. Orl I..: ; j °;'91. TOWN OF NAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMCNT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPURTATIOtJ PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: RELOCATE CHECKPOINT CHARLIE PROJCCT COMPLL.TION GATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION RELOCATE CHECKPOINT CHARLIE FROM ITS PRESENT LOCATION TO JUST SOUTH OF WILLOW CIRCLE. FUND # AND TTTLEc 10 - CAPITAL. PROJ[i~T COSTS 19`)2 l?'~.', 1994 199 1996 GRAND TOTAL (PING YCARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 201100 20000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE,~LANDSCAPIN(; & STREET 90000 90000 DFVEL.OPMENTS 8, IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 110000 110000 FUTUf:C REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL. T1iWN PROJECT:, - C CCiMM[tJT~ AND JUSTIFICATION RCCOMMENDATIUN GF BOTH THE MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND VILLAGE :iTREETSCAPE PLAfI. RELOCATE CHECKPOINT CHARLIE WEST ON GORE CREEK DRIVE TO WILLOW ROA[i. SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: %!~/91 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPGSED CAPITAL IMFRGVEMENT F'ft0.TECT DEPARTMENT DIVISIC.~N - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION Prc><rr_cT STAttfING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FRONTAGE ROAD WIDENING/LANDSCAPE Mt:JJ1(1NS fi'.OJECT ~;i,MPI_CTION DATE: PROJECT DESCRII'TIGN ANU LOCATION FRONTAGE ROAD L11DEN1NG/LANDSCAPE MEDIA^iNS - NORTH OF i.(tTEWAY PIr;ZA 71fRU 4-WA1' ^TiTP FUP1D A AND TITLE: (1/2) 10-CAPITr^. L. & (1/2) 30-RETf PR0.7Ei,T l'.OSTS 1192 .1993 1994 199 i 199G r3RAND TOTAL (PING Y'EAR~ 1 PLAt1NINC;;'DESIGfi ;'89c.4 i89b4 LANG Ai:51U I ~ I T ! iaiJ JITE, LANDSCAPING & SFREET 49431° 494318 DEVEIUF'MENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDirIG, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVCI_Gf'MENTS & IMPROVEMENTS ' YEARL'f iUTAL `i93732 5937ti2 FUTURE REYENUf` FROM PROJECT AMONG i1LL TOWN PROJCiS - C COMMC't~TS AND JU~TIFICATIOt1 ~•UBMITTPU BY: GREG HALL DAII 7,•'8/91 . ' FRONTAGE ROAD WIDENING/LANDSCAPE MEDIANS NORTH OF GATEWAY PLAZA THRU 4-WAY STOP jrfrj QUANTITY UNZT COST ~Q$t Asphalt (Inc. Overlay) 2,052 Tong $45/Ton $ 92,340 Asphalt Patching 53 Tona $65/Ton 3,445 Base Course 426 Tons $18/Ton 7,668 Unclassified Excav. 375 CY $12/CY 4,500 2' Island Walla 3,600 3F $30/SF 108,000 Bed Prep 14,365 SF $ 6/SF 86,190 Curb & Gutter 2,560 LF $12/LF 30,720 Storm Sewer 700 LF $30/LF 21,000 Inlets 5 $2000 EA 10,000 . Asphalt Removal 1,597 SY $ 3/YD 4,791 Saw Cut Asphalt 4,000 LF $ 1/LF 4,000 Landscape Tie 11,000 SF $ 2/SF 22,000 Striping 8,000 LF 15C/LF 1.2Q0 Subtotal $ 395,854 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 96,964 20t (Design, Construction Management and Salaries) 98.964 Total $ 593,782 1'i~WN C'f VAIL - f'kGPUSED C,^~PITf~L IMPROVEMENT PROJECT f.)CF';1RIMENT DIVISION f'nf;LIC WORK:: PUL'LIC WiaRK!TRP~i~;:POF;T('~TIGi! PRC><7CCT START1i!C; D~:TE: F'R(1JECT TITLC: fRGiITAC;E f~i);1D [TiKI: r>~ND PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT CUMPI_ETii?i! f)ATC: f'P~i7Ei:T DESGF;.If''llOil Ah!U LUC(:FIUt! f I?Gi!1(iG.[ kU(r[i E:IKE AMID F'EDCSTf;J(ii1 F'FrTtl - i~IORTIi SIDC :~f- COF'.D PAP.K - E: r1TTACHMEi~' FUND q AND T]TLE: lU G1F'ITNL ^RuJC~,T C(1S1'3 L'±?? L??,~> L??4 L)')'; ~"i? .;(;AND TOTAL i~IVE YEARS) t' LANid 1 NG; DE ~ IGt! 74 1 F. 1 74161 I_railD i1CG]U I :>.I T I~~it 5[TE, Lr1ND3CA^INC iREET 120f30, 120f30~ GC :'ELVF'ME.F!T:: P. It1f'RCr':'EMCNTS ftUllDliU), STRt1CTUFtE w PLrli1T DEVELUF'MEIdTS k IMPRO'.'EMEIlT~ `(!=At-:.LY TOTAL ]•1~T?r, r,, 14496 FUTURE F;E'VENUE FROM PRO.JCCT ,1MONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS C CGMMFNT':• AND JU~TIFIC('iTIGN IIEMITTEG EY: r;R~r; HriI.L GATE: 7;'3,x:%I FRONTAGE ROAD BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH - (NORTH SIDE OF FORD PARK1 COST ESTIMATE ~F~ OUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST Concrete 1,903 SY $30/SY $ 57,090 Base Course 675 Tons $18/Ton 12,150 Unclassified Excavation 550 CY $12/CY 6,600 Haul 307 CY $12/CY 3,684 Landscape 17,120 SF $ 1/SF 17.120 Subtotal $ 96,644 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 24,161 20$ (Design and Inspection) 24.161 Total $ 144,966 .1 CONCRETE - 2140 LF of 8' Wide Walk 2140 X 8 = 17,120 SF = 1,903 SY BASE COURSE 2140 x 9 x .5 = 9630 CF x 140#/CF = 1,348,200 = 675 Tons EXCAVATION - Cut 2140 x 9 x 6" Deep = 9630 CY = 500 CY EXCAVATION - Fill 2 X 2140 X 25 SF = 1070 CF = 40 CY or 50 CY After Compaction HAUL 357 - 50 = 307 CY LANDSCAPE 2 x 2140 x 4 = 17,120 SF TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION TEMPORARY CLOSING AND TEST OF I-70 RAMPS FUND~# AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL PRO.IECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRANp TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 60000 60000 120000 LAND AC9UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 232000 232000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 60000 292000 352000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - r. COMMC~ITS FIND JUSTIFICATION NU. 4 PRIORITY FROM MASTER TRANSPORTATION STUDY. APPROACH CDOH FOR FUNDING SOURCES. SUfSMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: 7/6/91 ' y TEMPORARY CLOSING AND TEST OF i-70 Design and Pre Test Coordination S 60,000 Improvements (Overhead Sign E. Vail, New Signs, Minor Frontage Rd. Improvements - Guardrail, Reduce Super Elevation Underneath Interchange, etc.) 200,000 Monitoring and Performing Test 60.000 Subtotal 320,000 lOg Contingency 3Z,,00o Total $ 352,000 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FRCQECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORT.ATION PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION WEST VAIL INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS FUND q AND TITLE: 10 - CAPITAL. PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1795 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 70000 40000 110000 LAND ACQUISITION 100000 100000 SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 330000 330000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 170000 370000 540000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - C COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION N0. 3 PRIORITY FROM MASTER TRANSPORTATION STUDY. APPROACH CDOH FOR FUNDING SOURCES. SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: 7/8/91 i WEST V IL INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS Construction Costs $ 300,000 Construction Contingency 30,000 R.O.W. 100,000 Design Costs 70,000 Construction Mgmt., Testinq and Staking 40,000 Total $ 540,000 TOWN GF VAIL. - PRGPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISJON - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPURTATIOtd PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FORD PARK SNOWDUMP REVEGETATION ~ PROJECT i:OMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCA7IOtl FORD PARK - RCMGVAL GF DEE~RIS AND CINDERS AtdD REVEGETATIGN OF OLD SNOW Dl1MF? ~ I 1 E . FUND q AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 19'72 199 19`)4 19'i5 1?9G r?RAND TOT(`iL (FIVE YEARS i f'LANtd] Nr.,; DESIGN f:00 f;00 L(iND ACQII I S I T ION ';IT[, LritlD:iCi'thl~li:; ~ ;;fF(:PT 1700 9700 LiEVELCiF'MENT:, f;, 1MPRCiV(:hicNTS YEARLY TOTAL 10000 10000 FUIUf;F FtEUCtdUC FROM F'R~:r,7ECT AMOiJG ALL TOWN PRr_,JECTS - RETT CC~MME1•!f3 ~'~ND JUCTIFICF•,T1GN GITf: i!f:'CDS I?C'vF~;ETrdfl~~tl ',`CR'( I',1D1_`(. rl!GMITTCD C!'i: li.~DU OF'F'CNfIEIhIf.:F; DOTE.: i;i,i; ;'.l FORD PARK SNOW DUMP REVEGETATION Soil Preparation 1,000.00 Seeding and Mulching 1,000.00 Planting of Perennial Wildflowers 2000 1 gal containers @ $3.00 each 6,000.00 Contingency 15$ 1,200.00 Project Management 10$ 800.00 Total $ 10,000.00 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: STEPFIEN'3 PARK - PIic~SE II PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROTECT DESCRIPTIGN AND LOCATION SOUTH FRGidT~<tGE WEST OF M.INNICKINNICK 13 ACRE NE I,311f3ORHO0D PARK PFIASE I I FUND q AND TITLE: 3G-RETT PROJECT COSTS 199; 1993 ].994 1995 19'3 f. t~RAi`ID TOTAL (FIVE YEARG) F'LAh?h!INl'~/DESI~3N `?UGO 9000 1'000 L.r;ND (iC6tUISITION ';ITE. LAPlDSCAPINt~ R STF:EET 115384 126500 2~i1334 DFJELOF'MENTS & IMF'ROVCMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 1233%34 135500 253334 FUTUP.E REVENUE FROM F'P.Cx7EC1 AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS RE TT COMHENTS AND JUSTIFIGATIOid COMPLETION OF PARK PRO.IECT PER APPROVED Mf;STERPLAN. SUEMITTED EY: TODD OPPENFIEIMER DATE: 7/8/91 STEPHENS PARK. PHASE II Asphalt Pavement $ 6,000.00 Concrete Pavement 11,000.00 Irrigated Shrubs and Trees 38,000.00 Reseeding 5,824.00 Restroom (Footings, Utilities in Phase I) 16,000.00 Park Lighting 15,650.00 Picnic Shelter 2,910.00 Site Furnishings 5.ooo.oQ $100,384.00 Contingency 15$ 15,000.00 Design and Management (8~) Revise Plans for Reissue Salary Charge Back 8.000.00 Total $123,384.00 STEPHEN'S PARK, PHASE III Pedestrian Bridge 22,480.00 Play Area 43,000.00 irrigated Shrubs and Trees 38,000.00 Site Furnishings 6.500.00 $110,000.00 Contingency 15~ 16,500.00 Design and Management (8~) Revise Plans for Reissue Salary Charge Back 9.000.00 Total $135,500.00 ti i TOWN OF VAII - PROPO:,ED CAPITAL IHPROVEMEITT PROJECT OEPr1RTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUELIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTLNC DATE F~Ri:~;lE,:f TITLE: SKI MU3r_UM PnRK StTE PR0.IECT COMPL(_TIOtI GATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND L.OCP,TIUN DEMOLITION OF SKI MUSEUM E3UIlDING AND CONSTkUCTIUN GF PEDESTFaAN F'L„ZA WITH L.AFIDSCAPTPIr,. FOUNTAIII ACID RESTROOM CUtID q r1N0 TITLE: 30 - RE TT PRn,lf_r:T ~:OSTS 1.792 19`' ~ 197h 199'; 1796 r;RANO TOTAL. (PIVI YEAF.~ i PLANIIINC,~DE~IGtI 22U(,~ 2206E I.PiiILt nCt;;U I3 I T Ii_ip! ;ITE. L.nND.^;i:AI'ItT~7 & 1TR[CT 33:,-1 '1 °~3d: fJC'~'EIUC'MENTS F: INF'ki:'1'EMC:NT~ fE:1Rl_'! TtjTAI_ ~ J.U5410 1054.10 CUIUF:E P.E1'ENUE fRC,M T'Ri~.7ECT AMiiiU:; Al_(. ?uWN f'RO•II'.~TS - R.ETT ,a)MMCNT~ b JUJTIF1Cf;T1Uli I~'R,~~JEC1 REt.4tJ[f~ED 8''r RELI.~:nTI~JN ,~F SK[ PiUSC.1J'ri fnCII.ITY, WILL C!7GRDINATE W1TH WEST MEnb06J DP,IVE PE[;ETF.IAN nRCn DE•JEL.OPMENT. ;;IJ(`:MITTED DY: T000 iiPPCiTfL':IMER GATE: ;/.'/7L SKI MUSEUM PARK SITE Building Demolition $ 5,150 Earthwork/Grading $ 5,952 Utility Work (relocates and service) $ 5,000 Restroom Building $ 40,000 Curb and Gutter - 190 LF@$9.00/LF $ 1,710 Drainage $ 3,050 Pavers - 2928 SF@$6.00/SF $ 17,568 Site Furnishings Allowance $ 3,000 Landscape Planting Allowance $ 6,200 Electrical - 2@$3500 $ 7,000 Irrigation - 2140 SF@$.63/SF S 1.350 Subtotal $ 95,950 Contingency - 15$ S 14.392 Subtotal $110,342 Design and Construction Management - 20~ S 22.068 Subtotal $132,410 Budgeted in 1991 <S 27.000> Total $105,410 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATIGN PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: TREE PLANTING PROGRAM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION YEARLY TREE PLANTING AT VARIOUS AREAS FUND Is AND TITLE: 30 - RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESI~N LAND AC9UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 10000 10000 .10000 10000 10000 50000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL ~ 10000 10000 .1.0000 10000 10000 50000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMGNC ALL. TOwra PROJECTS - RETT COHMErITS AND JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENHEIMF_R DATE: 7/8/91 TGWN OF VA(L. - f'h.OPO~ED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PkOJCCT DEPARTMENT DI`JISION PARKS f'UE3LIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: I'Rt).IECT TITLE: [3IGH0(?N PARK COMPLETION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: F'RU.7ECT DE:.CRIPTIOtJ AND LOCAT IOt1 E3IGHGRN PARE: - MEi~tD(iW DRI'JE AT JIINIF'ER LANE. COMPLETION i?F .?ARK DEVELC?PMFNT FROM 19 i9. RI:NO'JA'f I0N Cif I"'ROBIEM A12f AS. FUNCi q APlD T [ F I_E : 31i RE T T PRc?,7ECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 i?`''>5 19?6 DRANO TO1r1L (FIVE YEAP.S i PLf~NtJING/DESIGN f,00G 0 0 0 0 6000 LAND ACCIU I S I T I Ott S[TE, LANDSCAPING A STREET 203 L0 0 U 0 0 20310 DEVELOPMENTS R IMPRO'JEMENT~ YEARLY TOTAL 26310 0 0 0 0 26310 i ~UTURC F.E~'ENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - t'.L11 COMMCNTS AflU TUSTIFIC(tTION GIGIIr.~R.PI PAFK I1AS E3EEt! IIALf CUMPLETF..D S[NCE 1939, WHEN FUND[Nr; I?At! OUT. f'ARh. APPEARANCE (;tJD U~AEILITY IS PGOR. SOME SAFETY ISSUES NEED TO EE kE::OLVED. ::UBM(TTED CiY: TODD OPF'ENHFIMER tiAiG:'/3J91 BIGHORN PARK COMPLETION .l Scone of Word 1) Improve Pond Outlet - Allowance $ 1,000.00 2) Repair Walking Path 2000 sf @ 0.75/sf 1,500.00 3) Construct Boardwalk 5,750.00 4) Improve Entrance at Gate 1,460.00 5) Grading at Playground Edge 1,000.00 6) Landscape Planting Restroom 9,600.00 Hillside/Playground (24,000 sf at .40/sf) Picnic Area 7) Irrigation System Improvements 8) Design and Construction Management 20$ 6.000.00 Total $ 26,310.00 TOWN OF VAIL - PP.OF'GSED Cr1F'ITAL IMPROVEMEI•IT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS~'TRAt1SPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: LIONSHEAD TOT LGT ACCESS PATHS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION LIONSHEAD PARK - ASPHALT AND GRAVEL WALKING PATHS FROM LTONSHEAD TEtdN]S COURT:, AND GONDOLA AREA TO LIONSHEAD TOT LOT. FUt•!D N AND TITLE: :,0-RETT PROJECT COSTS 19?2 1?'?3 19?A 19?5 .1??6 CtRAIJD TOTAL (FIVE YEARSi PLAP!tlING%DESIGPI t21G 1210 i Lr1ND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET t;0i,0 6060 DEVELOPMENTS 8; IMPROVEMENTS `!EARLY TOTAL 7270 72i0 FUTURE REVENUE FROM F'itCiJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PftOJECT~ - RCTT ~:7JMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATIUi~I CUf?.REiITL'Y THERE IS NU CLEAR EP~S'f ••^d:CE:>G PU[N15 TG Ll~~il~til.AG TOT L!iT_ DOES NOT INCLUDE (iNY L.AiJO ACUU]:,TT1uP1 OR R[NOVFtTIGtJ OF EXISTING f'~'~CIL.ITY. SUL'PfITTED BY: TODD UPPENHLIMER DidTE: 7/3i?1 LIONSHEAD TOT LOT ACCESS PATHS 6' Gravel Path 675' @ 3.00/ft. $ 2,025.00 From Gondola 6' Gravel Path 475' @ 3.00/ft. _ 1,425.00 From Pedestrian Bridge Boardwalk 50' @ 10.00/ft. 500.00 Signage 4 @ 200 each 800.00 Culvert 20' @ 26.00/ft. 50.00 $ 5,270.00 Contingency 15~ 790.00 $ 6,060.00 Design and Management 20$ 1,210.00 Total $ 7,270.00 Does not include any land acquisition cost or renovation of existing equipment. TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTINr, DATE: PROJECT TITLE: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE I - MAIN VAIL INTERCHANGE PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION MAIN VAIL INTERCHANGE, I-70 AND VAIL ROAD. IMPLEMENTATION OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. FUNO li AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 19`3 19.4 1'~'.'S 1'~9ti GRAND TOTAL (FIVE 'YEARSI F'L~^~NItING/DESIGN 45350 17025 1702 U 0 79400 LAND ACQUISITION tiIT[, LANDSCAPINi3 & STREET 113500 113500 11.'.500 0 0 .'',40500 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YCARL`r TOTAL 1583"i0 130525 .1',052'; 0 0 419'300 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AHONG ALL TOWN PROJEC T - RETT COMMEt1T AND JU`;TIFICFiTION r;t)NT[NUES fsEAUTIFICATION PROJECT FOR I-70 CORRIGOk. IiI~;H f'ftIURITY AI:LcI. SUDMITTED HY: TODD OPPENfIETMEF: DATE: 7/8/91 LAAiDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MAIN VAZL Ij~TERCKA13rE pKASE T Og Landscape and Irrigation Improvements (1/3 of 340,000 estimate from BDAW,Inc. contingency) $113,500.00 ' Design Fees (10~ of $340,000) 34,000.00 Project Management (lOg of 113,500) 11.350.00 Total $158,850.00 Survey and base map costs are to be funded from 1991 budget for landscape improvement project. Project Management/design total 15~ for future phases to alloy !or revisions to plan and preparation oP construction document package. F TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: F'F:OJECT TITLE: DOWD Jl1hfCTION BIKE PATH PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATIOr! CsTKE PATII FROM THE END OF THE S. FRONTAGE. ROAD ICE 1NTERMOUI4TAIN TO U5. 24-6 ALONG GORE CREEK. FUND # AND TITLE: 30-RET7 POSSIBLE STATE RECRL-A1ION ~-UNG3 PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAtID TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 48'?9G 606'9 - ,'7904 109669 - 12b+194 LAND AC©UISLTION 16000 25x00 41000 .^•ITf, LP~NDSCAPING CTREET ?.44950 303~`i4 - 3R95~4 ;48344 - c,34d74 DEVE LOF'MENTS & IMF'RGVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PI_AN7 DEVELOPMENTS & IMF'FdOVEMENTS CONTT. MGMT., TESTING 27394 72915 - 934;5 1D2207 - 12237'3 SALARIES YEr1R.LY TOTAL 3J7334 46.18;;3 - 585'?13 801222 - 725?_4 7 FUTUF2E REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMGNG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - RETT COMMENT, AND JUSTIFICATION CONf1ECT A BIM, F. PATH FROM END OF SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD Tr? US 24-6 TIiROU4il DUWD CANY'Jr1 INCLUDES rRAOING, PAVING RETAINING STRUCTURES & MAJOR CcRIDGE. CROSSING. THE FIR~•T PHASE WOULD TRY TO GO TO GORE. CREEK 8 TLC: INTO I~70.. THE: SECOND PHASE WOULD DEAL WITN THE CROSSING OF THE RAILROAD ANU EAGLE FIVER. TI1E STAFF HAS r1PPR0ACHED CTATE PARKS OUTDCrGR RECREATION FOR A GRANT AND IN 1991 WL"F:E NOT SUCCESSFUL. STAFF ALSO F;EC1llESTEO FUNDII~IG 1N CDOH 5 YEAR PLAN AND WILL CONTINUE TO P1IRSUE OTHER ENTITLES AND PRIVATE CO(?F'ERATtOtd (UTILITY CUMPANIE~) FOR POSSIfLE FUNDING.. SUBMITTED BY: GREG HALL DATE: 7;.'t/91 ' 1001 Grand Avenue, Sulte 2-E ' / iCMYIlEtEll OOADON Y6tlEA /NG Glenwood Springs, Cl. ~ . ~ 81601 ' (30:3) 9,51004 (30Ci) 9258727 Fax 91fr6948 March 5, 1991 CONSULTING ENOINEEIIi ~ dY11YE1'OIIS/ Mr. Greg Hall, Town Engineer Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 RE: West Vail Bike Path Use of Cinnamon Creek Bridoe Dear Greg: The purpose of this letter is to provide information on the Cinnamon Creek Bridge so you can make a decision on its use for the West Vail Bike Path. I have enclosed some pictures of the bridge, cost estimates which can be compared with a new bridge and, finally, some schematic drawings of how the Cinnamon Creek Bridge might fit with the existing conditions. Enclosed are two cost estimates, both using the Cinnamon Creek Bridge. The first cost estimate includes the cost of removing the existing bridge, while the second cost estimate assumes the State Highway Department would have had to accomplish this in any case and ~jy includes the cost to transport the bridge to Vail. Many items in this cost estimate are the same as that required for a new pre-manufactured bridge and have the same cost estimate. Several items are different and are as follows: 1. The cost to remove the existing bridge and transport to Vail assumes one crane, four laborers, one pickup and two transport Vuck for three weeks. 2. The existing timber sidewalls will need to be restained at S 10,000. 3. A fence will need to be added to the sidewalls to meet the minimum 54° requirement estimated at 810,000. 4. The Cinnamon Creek decking consists of glue laminated timbers which will need to be replaced. The new decking is estimated at 810,000. 5. The vertical framework steel which was included in the Continental Bridge quote will have to be added and is estimated at b20,000. 6. We are adding time for a railroad inspector which may be required if a any of the abutments fall within the railroad right-of-way. Finally, we have attached a 2596 contingency because of unknown factors associated with dealing with a used bridge. Thus, the total cost for the Cinnamon Creek Bridge is estimated at 8210,625 with removal. If removal is not part of the Town of Vail's cost, we have ' estimated the cost at 4173,125. March 5, 1991 Mr. Greg Hall _ Page two Previously, we submitted an estimate for the Continental Bridge at 5192,350 without any contingency. Adding 83,000 for railroad inspection time with the subtotal now at $195,350, plus a 20% contingency of 539,070, the total cost for the Continental Bridge would be 8234,420. To summarize the cost estimates, the Cinnamon Creek Bridge will range from 8176,250 to 213,750, compared with the Continental estimate at 5234,000. These estimates compare with our original estimate to you for a generic bridge (based on a square footage basis) at 8299,000. Secondly, 1 have enclosed a plan and profile schematic.drawing for the bridge at an area just downstream of the existing sewer aerial crossing. For schematic purposes, we have used the same schematic profile obtained from the sewer aerial crossing. This profile lends itself well to four spans. Each of the spans are less than the spans of the Cinnamon Creek Bridge which have maximum spans of 103 feet. We are making the assumption that the pier locations for the new reconstructed bridge do not have to fall at the same location as the existing Cinnamon Creek Bridge provided that the span lengths are smaller than the Cinnamon Creek Bridge. The overall length would be approximately 254 feet and would have an approximate 3 h % grade. The vertical piers would vary in length from approximately 15 feet to 30 feet. It appears the piers will fall outside of any high water mark; however, one pier may have to be located ~on'the railroad property. Finally, I have enclosed some pictures of the Cinnamon Creek Bridge so that an analysis can be made on whether, aesthetically, a relocated Cinnamon Creek Bridge would be acceptable for this location. As you can see, the Cinnamon Creek Bridge has a fairly utilitarian appearance which may not blend in well with the Dowd Junction area. 1 hope this information has been of use to you. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Loins Meyer, P.E. LM:Ic/90177.10 Enclosure SCHMUESER GOROON MEYER, INr' TABLE 1 CINNAMON CREEK BRIDGE COST ESTIMATE WITH REMOVAL 1. Remove and transport bridge 4 35,000 2. Labor & equipment to erect new bridge i 50,000 3. Concrete abutments S 20,000 4. Asphalt deck 8 6,000 5. New coating on old timbers 0 7,000 6. Sidewall fence 8 10,000 7. New deckin 4 10,000 9 S. Vertical framework steel 8 20,000 9. Approaches 810,000 10. Railroad inspector S 3.000 Subtotal 8171,000 ' 2596 contingency 42.750 Total 5213,750 3/5/91 90177.11 /LM:Ic SCNMUESER OOROON MEYER, INC TABLE II CINNAMON CREEK BRIDGE COST ESTIMATE WITHOUT REMOVAL 1. Transport bridge 4 5,000 2. Labor & equipment to erect new bridge 4 50,000 3. Concrete abutments S 20,000 4. Asphalt deck S 6,000 5. New coating on old timbers S 7,000 6. Sidewall fence 4 '!0,000 7. New decking 4 10,000 8. Vertical framework steel 4 20,000 8. Approaches 410,000 10. Railroad inspector 8 3.000 Subtotal 4141,000 25°h contingency 35,250 Total 4176,250 3/5/91 8017 7.11 /LM:Ic SCHMUESER OORDON MEYER. INC ~~1D JUNCTION BIKE PATH - PHASE I COS' WEST VAIL TO I-70/GORE CREEK BRIDG$ TOTAL LENGTH - 3510 LINEAL FEET Mobilization Lump Sum L.S. $ 10,000 Subgrade Lump Sum L.S. $ 25,000 Preparation Asphalt 880 Tons@$60/T $ 52,800 Base Course 1,600 Tons@$12/T $ 19,200 Fence Relocate 1,500 L.F.@$10/LF $ 15,000 Drainage Lump Sum L.S. $ 1,500 Appurtenances Retaining wall 2,815 S.F.@$30/LF $ 84,450 Revegetation 20,000 L.S. $ 20,000 Deer Crossing 30 x 10 S.F.@$50/SF $ 15,000 8' x 5' box culvert Raise Manholes 10 $200/EA $ 2,000 Subtotal $244,950 20~ S 48.990 Contingency Subtotal $293,940 or $81/L.F. 10~ Const. Mgmt., Testing $ 29,394 Staking & Salaries Right of Way 400 x 10 x 4 S 16.000 Total $339,334 DOWD JUNCTION BIKE PATH - ALTERNATE NO. 1 _ NORTH OF I-70 TOTAL LENGTH - 1652 LINEAL FEET Mobilization Lump Sum L.S. $ 10,000 Subgrade Lump Sum L.S. $ 15,000 Preparation Asphalt 350 Tons@$60/T $ 21,000 Base Course 637 Tons@$12/T $ 7,644 Drainage Lump Sum L.S. $ 2,000 Appurtenances Retaining Wall 800 S.F.@$30/LF $ 24,000 Revegetation Lump Sum L.S. S 10.000 Subtotal $ 89,644 Bridges (see below) Range: $213,750 - $299,880 Subtotal Range: $303,394 - $389,524 20~ Contingency Range: $ 60,679 - $ 77,904 20$ Design, Const. Range: S 72.815 - S 93.485 Mgmt., Testing, Staking,~Salaries Subtotals Range: $436,888 - $560,913 Right of Way - 14.5 Ac. Appraised Value $10,000 Assume S 25.000 - S 25.000 Total Range: $461,888 - $585,913 TYPES OF BRIDGES Cinnamon Creek 3,556 $60/S.F. $213,750 w/removal Continental 2,520 $85.70/S.F. $215,964 New Arch Bridge 3,528 $85/S.F. $299,880 ..J' TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRCI7ECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLtC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: DONOVAN PARK/CEMETARY PRGJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIP71ON AND LOCAT1Crtd DESIGN AND CCrNSTRUCTIGN OF COMMUNITY PARK AND ADJOINING CEMETARY FACILITY. FUND p AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 L995 199E GRAND TOTAL (FIVE 'YEriR::i PLANNING/DESIGN 84000 41000 41000 410GU 207000 LAND (1000ISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & :,TREET 410000 410000 410004 1230000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 94000 451000 4;.1000 551000 1437000 FUTURE REVENUE FRGM PR0.TECT AMONG .,LL TOWN PROTECTS - RF_Ti COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION VERIFY TIi~T CEMETAPY IS FUNDABLE BY RETT FUNDS. SUP.FiITTED BY: TODD GPF'ENfiEIM[R DATE: 7/6;91 ~ _ DONOVAN PARK/CEMETERY 1991 Estimated Design Fees Adjust to Include Cemetery $ 84,000.00 1992-1995 Construction Budget Not Adjusted for Cemetery $ 410,000.00 Annually 1992-1995 Project Management 10$ $ 41,000.00 Annually 0 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT ~ DIVISION - PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: VAIL DAS SCHONE BIKE PATH PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO LOCATION 1750' LONG 8' WIDE BIKE PATH - INCLUDING STORM SEWERS, CURB AND GUTTERS, ETC. FUND q AND TITLE: 30 - RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 22083 22083 LAND AC9UISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 110418 0 0 0 0 110418 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING, STRUCTURE & PLANT DEVELOPMENTS 6 IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 132501 0 0 0 0 132501 FUTUP,E REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL TOWN PROJECTS - RETT COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION 3EE ATTA~:HMENT SUBMITTED BY: GREG I1ALL GATE: 7/8/91 VAIL DAS SCHONE BIKE PATH 1750' Long 8' Wide Bike Path Including Storm Sewers, Curb and Gutters, Etc. .:F Asphalt 1750 X 8 X 330 X 45 = $ 11,550 18,000 Base Course 1750 X 12 X .5 X 140, X 15 = 11,025 2,000 Earthwork 1750 X .75 X 12 + 1750 X 10 X •5 X 8 = 7 260 27 ' Fine Grading 1750 X 12 X 2 = 4 650 9 ' Storm Sewer 700 X $18/LF 12,600 Inlets 5 X 1000 5,000 Landscaping 1750 X 15 X 1 26,250 Utilities Conflicts 10.000 Subtotal 88,335 25$ (Mobilization, Traffic Control and Contingency) 22,083 20~ (Design and Inspection) 22.083. Total $ 132,501 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FORD PARK WALKWAY AND PATH LIGHTS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION FORD PARK - COMPLETION OF PAVED WALKWAY PATH AND LIGHTS THROUGH FORD PARK. SOUTH SIDE RECREATION FIELD TO EXISTING PATH FROM PLAY AREA. FUND q AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1995 .1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 4000 0 0 0 0 4000 LAND ACQUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 39800 0 0 0 0 39800 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 43800 0 0 0 0 4:300 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL. TOWN PROJECTS - RETT CUMMENT~ AND JUSTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENHEIMER DATE: 7/8/91 FORD PPtRK W~LKWF~~AND PATH LIGHTS Excavation and Subgrade Compaction 10o cy @ 10/cy $ 1,000.00 8' Colored Concrete Walk 550 if @ 22/lf 12,100.00 Ford Park Path Lights 6 @ 3500 each 21,000.00 Revegetation of Disturbed Area 5000 sf X .10 500.00 Contingency 15$ 5,200.00 Project Management 10$ 4.000.00 Total $ 43,800.00 Same light fixture as Stephens Park Project. Purchase in larger quantity will result in savings. TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DLPARTHENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION ,PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: BIGHORN TOWNHOUSE REVEGETATION PROJECT COMPLETION DATE; PRCL7ECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION MEADOW DRIVE AT BIGHORN PARK REVE~3ETATION OF PROPOSED VACATED (1CCESS EASEMENT. FUND ii AND TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTSi 1992 193 1994 1.995 1996 GRAtlD TOTi1L (FIVE YEARS) PLNNNING/DESIGN 1000 0 0 0 0 1000 LAND ACAUISITION SITE, LANDSCAPING & STREET 4350 0 0 0 0 4350 DEVELOPMENTS B IMPROVEMENTS /EFIP.LY TOTAL ~i350 0 0 0 0 5350 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PRC~7ECT AMONG ALL TOWN F'R0.7ECT~ - P,ETT CGMMENTS AND JU~TIFICATIUtT F;LV'CC~ETATTON , SUBMITTED DY: TOGD OPPENIIEIMF_R OATE: 7/3;91 a ~7cxORN TOWNHOLSF R_F:VF'GETATION Salaries to Perforce Vacation of Sxietinq Driveway Area S 1,000.00 Scarify and Regrade 600.00 Soil Preparation 3,000.00 Ssedlnq/Mulching Z~Q~Q Total $ 5,350.00 TOWN OF VAIL PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRC>,TEC.T DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORKS/TR.ANSPORTATIGhI PROJECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: FRONTAGE ROAD LANDSCAPE MEDIANS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION CONSTRUCTION OF STONE I_AND~Cf•~PED MEDIAN ISLANDS - SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD AT VILLAGE TRAhlSPORTATIUN CCNTER - VAIL VALLEY DRIVE TO CROSSROADS CHUTE FUNfi # AND TITLE: .0-RFTT PROJECT COSTS 1992 1993 1994 1'395 1996 GRAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DESIGN 16400 .16400 LAND AC9UISITION SITE. LANDSCAPINr, & STREET 94094 34094 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL 110494 110494 FUTURE REVENUE FROM PROJECT AMONG ALL. TOWN PROJECTS - Rf"TT COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNCiiONAL PLAN PORTION OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN. IMPROVf.S AESTIIETIC C7UALITY OF AREA BY ADDING SCREENING i0 STRUCTUR[ ANG BREAKINr, UP WIDE EXPANSE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. SUBMITTED BY: TODD OPPENHE(MER DATE: ?/£1/9.1 FRONTAGE ISL.sNDS AT VAIL TRANSPORTATION CENTER Douro/bite Preparation L.S. S 1,500.00 Curb and Gutter 765 if @ 9.00 6,885.00 Asphalt Patch 56.1 ton @ 100 5,610.00 18" Cobble Wall 1150 sf @ 40 46,000.00 Topsoil (2') 335 cy @ 15 5,025.00 Irrigation (Small System) 4518 sf @ 0.62 2,801.00 ® Plant Mat®rial L.S. 9,000.00 Electrical Service L.S. (Allowance) 5.000.00 Subtotal 81,821.00 Contingency 15t 12,273.00 Design and Construction Management (tot) S 16.400.00 Total $110,494.00 TOWN OF VAIL - PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DEPARTMENT DIVISION - PARKS PUBLIC WORF;S/TRANSPORTATION PROTECT STARTING DATE: PROJECT TITLE: BUFFEIiR CREEK TUT LOT PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION BUFFEHR CREEK PARK CONSTRUCTION OF A PLAY AREA FOR TODDLER AGE CIiILDREN. FUND p ANU TITLE: 30-RETT PROJECT COSTS 199? 1993 1994 1995 1996 (:RAND TOTAL (FIVE YEARS) PLANNING/DEIGN 3000 3000 LAND ACQUISITION STTE, LANDSCAPING 8 STREET 15000 15000 DEVELOPMENTS & IMPROVEMENTS YEARLY TOTAL ~ 1£3000 1.G 000 FUTURE REVENUE FROM FRO.TECT AMONG ALL TOWN PRCKIECT~ - ^ETT COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICF~T1Ut! PR~~aEi;T HAS PEEN PART OF OVERALL CONCEPT FOR PARK SINCE URIGIt1AL CONSTRUCTION. TFIIS PROJECT WILL COMPLETE TFIE FACILITY. SUDMITiED BY: TODD uPPENIIEIMER DATE: 7/8/91 BUFFEHR CREEK TOT LOT Planning and Dssign $ 3,000.00 Play Bquipaent 7,000.00 Play Aroma Edq~ and Surface 5,000.00 Landacap~/Sprinkler Restoration 2,000.00 Contingency i.ooo.oo Total $ 18,000.00