The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991-08-27 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session fi~~ 's VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1991 1:00 PM REVISED AGENDA 1. PEC Report 2. DRB Report 3. Trapping in Eagle -Committee update 4. Discussion: State of Colorado Department of Local Impact Assistance Program Grant Application for Public Facilities/Community Development Projects 5. Joint Work Session with the Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Housing Authority 6. Discussion of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code to provide for the implementation of the Employee Housing Study Phase I recommendations 7. Information Update 8. Other 9. Executive Session -Consultation with the Town Attorney regarding specific legal matters 10. Adjournment C:WGENDA.WS e`=/L~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1991 1:00 PM AGENDA 1. PEC Report 2. DRB Report 3. Trapping in Eagle -Committee update 4. Discussion: State of Colorado Department of Local Impact Assistance Program Grant Application for Public Facilities/Community Development Projects 5. Joint Work Session with the Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, and Housing Authority 6. Discussion of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code to provide for the implementation of the Employee Housing Study Phase I recommendations 7. Information Update 8. Other 9. Adjournment CIAGENDAWS (,~S tt.v4ryu..~ 3 ~~a~~kr .~Tsk force a Tees • --~a g . , . ~~_on ~5-foot trapp~ng:~.~ limit for area trails B Cara DeGette were discussed, but the group could y not come to a consensus. v~rys~uw~ is a real tough one, and I • After only one meeting, a cum- don't know what the answer is," mittee to create a trapping plan for Konishi said. "People walldng up _ : Vail has agreed on seven of eight and down a trail should feel az ease, : issues raised at a Tuesday meeting. but in the backcountry, you do have During the meeting, the five-pee- to realize you're taking risks." son task force agreed trapping The trapping issue became an _ within IS feet of both sides of emotional topic beginning last fail . several heavily-used trails in Vail after several local dogs were caught should be prohibited. in leghold traps while walking with~;~; "We didn't mess around," said their owners on recreation paths Mark Konishi, the area manager for around Vail. = the Division of Wildlife. "Everyone The committee also agreed should pat themselves on the back restrictions should only apply to: for their cooperation and spirit of leghold traps near the trails, as resolution.". other types of traps don't pose a Representing factions from all threat to animals or humans. Snare sides were Konishi, Vail Council traps and pine martin traps would member Lynn Fritzlen, Bruce Bar- be permitted. Trails would be iden= tow of the Colorado Trapping As- ~ those that ate establishei)"~ _ _ _ _ _ sociation, Eagle County Commis- and maintained by a governm~~~ , stoner Bud Gates and Vail Animal entity and identified-by--map=„~,~, - Control Officer Bob Slagle. brochure. - ~ • = -sue- The only issue the group was un- , The 15-foot restriction ~ ~woiild able to agree on is how far up the only be in effect the month of Oc - trail the 15-foot limit should go. tuber, as that's when the problems, ,~I„imits. ranging from 100 yards to ~ '.f~~ ; to miles uv from .the trailhead: t see T?nva~s 1~ :max,. =r~,~.,. a ~ ~.,x..,....., :IGo~hi:. said. The after about three hours az~ the liar-~' ~place-a§ ear)E~ag ~~~4~-,1~ Y- 'FJ t •.a...~..~,,.~ Should be gaining .table. That's a good sign, '°I1tey'll have tp,;httst~,{t~tough," - m:the county's leash law, but Konishi said, as factions in Boulder' he said. ~ a~ ~:x.=it :slioti~d ~ be enforced, and signs County have met to resolve tea - After a pulilic,hea g;tle tiown P ;should .,be .erected to let le in issues rune times over several could pass.., a,~~resolutiot~~;;pitd.~ap= PAP ~P g kn`-bw~~trapping is allowed in the years and still haven't reached a proach the Ihvtston of;~*dlrfeafor ffiea they are hiking in. consensus. Any trapping emergency ~.:arr .,vats g. there _ ; "FTtte ou identified heavil resolutions assed in Ea le Count Se I8-19 coinm" I R c,-gr P Y- P g Y P r"" trails. in Vail as Big Horn,.. could very well become a statewide in Grand Jutictfon:_~ ~ • yyooth,~'Pitkin, Spraddle,. Gore example. ''~~~4~ w`~~": i k,~•Deluge, Buffer and Mill Konishi said he .expects a If not passed,tl3tt,_ ` ~Creek~~ }•x recommendation- on trapping would likely be{ br~ought« they-, .:.~'These:::are where the bi est re ations in Vail [o come before commissioners .~next~~e ~ gg ~ bsuary ~ ~roblems•are," Konishi said. the town council as soon as next .when all trapping regulatioiis~ u~t'he'::~ Tlte'group came to agreements in wec3;, and a resolution could be in state will be reviewed;: ~ y,~-~r~~ v' . REC'0 AUG 2 61991. X C Ron . i°~ .//i,J s August 22, 1991 Public Services Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Please know that I, along with many people who enjoy and actively use our wilderness at all times of the year; have strong concern regarding the proximity of traps to established trails and hiking areas. Please use careful consideration when making your decisions regarding the restriction of trapping. The safety of children, adulfs, and pets must be placed foremost in your fact-gathering process. As I mentioned pets in the above paragraph, I must tell you that I disagree with trapping as it is cruel and inefficient. There are other animals beside loved family pets that come under your juris- diction and protection. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. Please use your authority and capability to make and keen our wilderness a safe and enjoyable place for humans and animals, Sincerely, Mary Anrie Mills _ 736 Sandy Lave Vail, CO 81557 303-476-7172 . cc: VaiT'.Town _Counci:l1,~ Bogle County Board~of Commissioners Eagle Ualley Humane Society ~ ,,,_r~` AEC'0 AUG 2 6 199f August 23, 1991 Mr. Kent Rose, Mayor Vail Town Council Members 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Re: Proposed Employee Housing Ordinance Dear Mayor and Town Council: In April 1991 I purchased a home at 227 Rockledge in Vail. Needless to say, we enjoy our home and the Town of Vail very much. I have learned of a proposal which, if enacted, would encourage building employee housing spaces or units within residential homes. The purpose of this letter is to encourage the Town of Vail to pass such an ordinance. I am one homeowner who, if given a motivation to do so, would seriously consider such an addition to my home. The motivation would be in the form of a square footage allowance of approximately 250 feet and few restrictions on its use. One proposed restriction is a prohibition against selling the _ _ _ _ _ housing unit separate from the house. I agree with that restriction. I am pleased that Vail may be proactive in dealing with the employee housing problem which is prevalent throughout Colorado's ski industry. The passage of some meaningful employee housing ordinance would be a "win-win" situation for the Town, ski industry employees, and homeowners like me. I support the Town's efforts to once again show its leadership on a ski industry issue, and trust you will act favorably on the proposal. Very truly yours, ~G _ Steve Kirby P.O. Box 5077 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-58 7 SK/ad ?RT~ ~ ENTERTAINMENT Mike Pearson, Entertainment Editor • 892-5447 ~4; ~ ti ~ a;l ? ' Y~ 'i try=a' ~ ~3~: s~ ~ ~ x.< ..nri 3zZ ,,.:~k~=4'D ~ o • * dip: :;dc's '~<~•~a s •,a;" t,.~~a~ ` a.~ 'e`~ ~ ay~~~~'•, tic;; ' ? ~T~T ' I \ L ~.G ~ ~ ~6~ ai ty i. gyp` r'. !Y c , r,. ~ O i w!t.. ~ . 3 ' '~r~<. f •c ~ s ~ . .n ; - ~ s,. • ~ ~ , , , ~f i p ~ ;a _ ~ r s. ~ > ~ r s:.,.. 7 . ~ .A s~ , v y~ C ~y~^ ~ L ~.~*rNl .e~ W FCC ~,t .'•~x y~ .s~,i _ ~ >°f i~ ~ J1 Is, _ ~ ~ _ > r ~ ~a ~ '1 ~ , ) .h i ~ ~ i 5 f ~ ~ ~ l.k~ ~~6~'~~~~+~i 3~ 1"9;3. yl~l'~'Y,~, ..'nr e ~ ~~<s,' . ~ • is of s Culture a potential mother lode f or Colorado tourism 1• Stories by Mary Voelz Chandler "We're proud to have the arts expensively upscale, like the inau- Raley Mountain News StajJ Wr;rer community be something we're gural outing last month of Den- n known for," said Dave Lock, assis- ver's Cherry Creek Arts Festival. his weekend, a projected tant city manager and a member of T 20,000 art lovers and tour- the Loveland High Plains Arts And maybe it's fortune-cookie . fists will find their way to the Council. "We realize it has an eco- economics to call the effect a new town of Loveland, where the annu- .nomic benefit." kind of gold up in the hills, a al Sculpture in the Park show and potential mother lode for Co]ora- ~ sale puts about 1,100 pieces on the Last year's sales topped do's $5.9 billion tourism industry. `b block $504,000, bringing in $12,691 in $ut more and more, government sales tax. This year the city of officials and arts organizers are For visitors, the show -billed 38,000 spent $30,000 marketing discussing how arts and culture as the country's largest outdoor Loveland as "A Work of Art." activities do more than improve sculpture sale - is a chance to the quality of life; these intangibles browse and buy. For artists, it Maybe it's a cliche that if you attract tourism and tourist dollars, presents a captive audience scratch a Colorado summer week- and the numbers are growing. soothed by sun. And for Loveland, end, you'll find an ,arts festival, it's an example of the town's fifth some of them little more than a The festival genre began in Col- n.. , ~ , Iarg~st.employer -r art,-~flexin~ gathering of vans hawking kitsch ~ ~ ' • • ~ ~ ~ .its rfiuscle: ~ ~ ~ ^ a ~ ~ ~ : a ~ Lj ~ : ' •qut'of the back door; some of them See ARTS on 120 ' •~~f.«/~~r~'I'/'[~/td~tillAf~ I~ ~.,.i; nt; ~„+n~ ~ t3 4~II!_ ..,t~~(2 )4 - - r ~ ~ ~ , dumber of f estlvals on the rise as total s end~n doubles in ast decade A g P RT$ from 118 about the importance of various amenities • ~ aJ shutdowns or the eva ration of an Indus- ~ado in June 1949 with the Aspen Music during their trip, showed that an average of ~ try, though, the arts qn mean economic ~stival and broadened in the'70s with the 1846 visited museums or galleries, 2% ~j survival, ; _ a nergence of Telluride's summer season visited a wo, while fi4'o attended a festival As Lyn Dodd is discovering. The head of gatherings devoted to everything from or fau; for vacationers staying at a summer ~ - the Colorado Consortium of Community ' uegrass to film. Now the festival is a resort, an average of 1196 visited a festival, ~ r, Arts Councils is molding the organization's , atewide species. while only about 14b of those on a camping : s September convention around the theme of ' Total spending on the arts has doubled in ~P might attend a festival. The study was ~ ~ "Cultural Tourism: Marketing the Arts as e past decade. A survey prepared for the prepared by the Toronto-based Longwoods ~ . an Economic Attraction." Most of the ~lorado Council on the Arts and Human- International Inc. • . ~ ~ state's 90 arts councils belong to the con- es showed that Colorado arts groups and The availability of cultural activities ~f~N ~ ~ sortium, which offers support, services and ose attending events statewide spent ranked 15th of 45 factors among those k5 ~ • ~ a network for arts professionals. Dodd lives ~ 108 million in 1989, with a cash impact of choosing a destination for what the board ~ ~ in Silverton, where this week mine closings ?39 million. A 1983 study showed spend- calls a "city vacation," while it ranked 34th r " ~ " ~ ~ mean that 80 families face an uncertain g of $51.4 million - with an impact of for those heading for the great outdoors, ~ financial future. 118.7 million on the Colorado economy, and 32nd and 33rd, respectively, for people .~,z y staying at a ski resort and a summer resort. Planning arts events and touting cultural Cities surve ed for the state arts council ~ ` ~ ~ - attractions "improves the quality of life in a nged from urban Denver and Colorado From all this, there s no way to tell how ~y town," Dodd said. "But we have to be ~ ~nngs to festival-drenched Telluride and ~Y People figure on one kind of vacation, < M realistic. We need some outside money." spen -and Creede, where the Creede and wind up in activities on which they had At recent town meetin s to discuss the epertory Theatre is a cornerstone of the not planned, or who add on a day or two ut ~ ~ ~ 1 g order to work a concert or a festival into future of Silverton, Dodd said her message J ;onomy. It s the largest single employer 1. the county;' said Kent Hager, adminis- then vacation, said Don Merrion, research ~ was this is what we do for you. We need mans er for the Colorado Tourism Board. your support. ator of Creede and Mineral County. g _ Unmeasurable in numbers is the growth The board, he said, has tried to expand the s For a town of 700, like Silverton, the other amenities: the bed and breakfast or usage of why people come here: It's not ' impact of drawing 500 tourists a day during illery that opens to serve theater-goers in lust an outdoors experience, but.one where ~ „ a folk festival timed to piggyback onto a ; reede or the restaurant that enters the cultural activities can play a big role. ` ' ` " •A' music festival in Telluride -means "ev- arketplace because an arts center at- "From focus groups we get a sense that Arrist Mike Tuma, of Hot Springs, S.D, ery room is taken, every campsite taken. I acts visitors to Walsh. Or the chance the reason people come to Colorado is was able to say, 'We had this many peo- counter of tourist and event, the possibil- ~ outdoors. People like to add on other factoring. Cautioned Robert Wobbekind of Ple. ' y to snag someone driving through ~ .,,;.riences, but you cans never get away the Business Research Division of the Uni- Anew theater group m Silverton - ~wn who stops to investigate a crowd of from your major strength versit of Colorado at Boulder the or ani- called A Theatre Grou y g p - is in its second :ople gathered in the park and ends up The arts "enhance and add another di- ration that prepared the 1990 arts council season, in a way the natural replication of aving a meal or booking a room overnight. mension to people's vacation," said Debo- survey:lt's impossible to rank arts spend- the Creede troupe (which after 26 years ' When "culture" is isolated as a reason rah Milo of the Tourism Board. "It's such a ing in terms of its impact when measured has embarked on a successful million-dollar ~r tourism, it makes a slight showing. A rich resource, but how do you use it.?" against sugar beets or cattle; the impact is renovation program). The Theatre Group ~ ~l) of 20,000 1989 U.S. vacationers Tourism is in the Top Three of Colorado just too small. is immersed in a George Bernard Shaw eluding 1,000 who visited Colorado - .industry, along with agriculture and mane- In the case of towns hit hard by mine festival and is planning a move into a new ~1 AMPA STEAMBOAT SPRINGS . . Croy theater muddles through hard times Pulling a f ew strings and drawing a crowd ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~a T~~nrro~tnlwa Narr ,....,G ~ ~ ~ - ~ ::~L~:i:Y S.3~;i:L:J~IJ01 EtrltKlJwvocn, ~ at,{.- ~ News Sun., Aug.11,1991 Sun., Aug. l 1,1991 Rocky Mountain News ~ ' CRIME WATCH ~ COVER STORY: A its as industry ~ ' _ arrested in shooting ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r a~~~. ~ . ~ ~ . _ ,°~9~~; ~ a• ~ 4+ . ev : ~ FAST FACTS giver man was shot to death " -r° v " Friday morning, and the man ~ Steamboat Springs spends $ t million a ; . . ~eported it to police was ~ year - 2096 of the city's operating bud- ty ~ ~ ~ get - on promoting and "eventing." It led for investigation of mur- a F also spends $100,000 in seed money to knverpolice said. Officers ~ ~ help develop new events. called to an apartment build- ~ ~ ~ In Loveland; the arts rank No. 5 as an :1410 Pearl St. about 1:05 ' employer, after Hewlett-Packard, the - ~n a report of shots fired, ~ w a - school system, walmart Corp. and McKee , said. When they arrived, ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' Medical Center. Found Eric Johnson, 40, shot ~ ~ , ~ In Denver, the Cherry Creek Arts Festival ~ ~ ~ Jury 6-T brought a $2 million to $3 million ath in a second-floor hallway.. ~ - ickRay Crosby, 34, had re- " ~ ~ F ~ beneflt to the city, and artists made _ ~ ' ~ $350,000 to $400,000, according to Bill . , :d the shooting and originally , . ~ ~ D-"~ x~~,,, Chamey, director of the inaugural event. :onsidered a witness, officers ` > ~a~° € In Telluride, the town's income trom sum- Afterinterviewing other peo- . , _ , , t, ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ met arts vs. winter skiing is reflected in . 'M sales tax: "They're within 1096 of being lowever, Crosby was arrested ~ ~ ~ , vestigation offirst-degree ` ° ~ A ' ~ ~ ~ even, and that means something," said • - ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ Kevin Swain, town finance officer. lei, police said. ka - In Walsh, arts lovers drew 300 people to a ~ „ ..;~.r i'' l slipped poison drink ~ ~ , sampler three years ago and drummed up ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ enough economic supportto transform , ntinental Airlines employee ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ , ~ ~ the old Gem Theatre on Main Street into iospitalized after someone ap- _ Re "t ° : the Walsh Arts Center. The center, which ntly deliberately switched a ~ ~ ~ f , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ overs dinnertheater, concerts and art :solvent for a drink he had ' ~ ~ E G;> shows, last year was awarded the EI ght to work, Denver police r~M ~ J~~~~~ m' pomar Foundation's Award for Excellence ~ -and $ ! 0,000. The man was at work at 8080 ' ~~r, 4 : • . h Road late Tuesday night ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ t , . 1 someone took his drinking their value to the community artistically. tom the top of his toolbox, ~ M°~> s~~ That said, Neal added that the council's :e said. He later took a drink ' rural initiative grants for fisca11993 will be i it, police said. Hewas hospi- - P ~ awarded with an eye toward resort commu- ed instable condi6on,police ~ ~ pities. There are two elements, she said - to strengthen economic contrib n .Detectives were investigat- ~ ~ ~ _ r•,.. - olio s of , hecase asafirst-degree as- Grand Junction artists and brothers Laverne, left, and Harlan Mosher assemble Geo Nexus for a festival in Loveland. ~ groups and to help resorts estabflsh t,policesaid. safeguards of quality of life. operation alleged ~ home, said board president Marianne when that is the highest priority of the local lined potential for the state, said Barbara That's the r. .,de of, the cultural community. Neal, executive director of the state arts boom. g agents raided their second Fearn. 1-makin o ration in a week . "What we are attempting to do, aside "I tell arts people, you influence your council. "lt's a magic partnership," she Recent reports from Telluride found res- S ~ from good theater, is to add to the econom- local government to put the arts communi- said. "It's not just for the tourist. It brings a idents concerned that the town had e Denver azea, seizing an ~ _ :e of the finished product, ac- is base of the town, 'she said. ty at a higher priority than a new sewer great ambience and richness to the town as weekendarock festival that produced an system or a new city hall. We don't go out well." ring to the Drug Enforcement ~ Both theater groups have used technical ushin arts, but we don't o out ushin Although Nea] knows the value of luring unusual number of visitors with nalodging iinistration. DEA agents and assistance from the state Department of pity halls, either." g p g outside money, the council does not deal in and with a destructive bent. Although the len police raided the home - Local Affairs as they plan and raise money. That said, "the great capacity of the arts funding tourist attractions, she said. "Eco- winter season still pumps in from 559fi-57~o ay at 113 Orion St., police Arts development is not the depart- is to add a feeling of hope. The theater has nomic development doesn't play a role in of the sales tax income, summer is clos~ .Arrested for investigation of ' , : ~ done that in Creede." our grants. We're working on artistic and , ufacturing a controlled sub- ment's goal, said director Larry Kallen- ce wer;Sto~p en L. Nelms and. ~ Berger. "Where we touch on the arts is Cultural tourism still has an underuti- managerial strengths of programs and See ARTS on 1 ick C. De!:ui,ie, both 18. A lab ° ~ ¦ . ¦ . w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A • • - ~ I ~ _ _ . _ " _ . ~ . _ _ Rg~l€j?Mbul~t~lh'hltivV~-) Surf':; Aug: 11 ~ 199 U ~s- r . - . , ~ . ~ t' • ~ • M usic festivals rowin g g e e0r~ A~T$ from 121 Carbondale residents and to ~°i~ide/~~a0 in in, sa s finance director Kevin "bring people in and let them see (11:40120 s:1o) )~o loss ~ g Y what's happening here." But, "we • (1130 210 72010:10 < ` Swain. don't want it to get much bigger. It 31 jii.9~o ~ s2oj e~o~o ioi9 ~ - ~ "The summer economy holds maxes out the town." Rl Rao) 72o e:ao its own. A lot of people debate the The fair funds about half the bELAC(x1N(vGt3)• (11502:30) : ! The Muskat meiit of the lar a crowds when is g E budget of the arts council, which • (11201+s 5:30) 755 ro:1s ~ ~ The enough enough," said Swain. "But sponsors performances, operates (lrao 25o s:1o) 7~s e:as Heart and Soul if we took the events away and just ~ a public art program and awards (11m 2.90 IAO sno)19o 955 : tried to do without out them, no (DG13) (uas 125 soo) 7:4510:10 of grants 'and scholarships - activi- 3) (u:3s r.4o s2o) 72s , Broadway! one wants that. We have to have ties that won the council a 1990 (1r1s 2ao s:1ai ens events to draw people here, we're Governor's Award for Excellence. I . eos 1095 , so far off the map." The success of the fair =this . In Winter Park, a recent debut year about $300,000 in art was ' " reggae festival drew about 3,700 sold -also has demonstrated its (11:3o r.4s s2s) e:oo 1020 - enou h eo le to make a rofit (11:40 2:55 5:35) 7:50 9:50 ® g P P P power, said arts council president Pc17) • (12:15 1:75 5:10) 7:40 10.05: DINNER and a smaller crowd than other Nancy Blakeslee. "In the last few ? (12:75 3:00 500) 755 9:55 ~ 1 HEA7 RE ~ ~ music festivals, but a youn er I) ~ nso s.9s) 7ss 1o:ts > 8 years, I think people have started tzoo 4:so) 72s e:4s ~ crowd that was rnexperienced in to realize the real economic irnpact 13) ~ (12:10 2:30 s.9o) 7:30 loco ~ ~ ~ festivals. Some people overin- of the Mountain Fair," she said. ):IS 10:10 ; Bulged themselves," said Brian That's what the National En- UEUGOON(PGI3)• (1124) O'llanlon of tlTe Winter Park g 112:25 2:40 5:151. ; / , dowment for the Arts is seein as from the ere9lor of Chamber of Commerce, which it reviews grants, said Harvey • • ~ A CHORUS LINE... sponsors festivals in conjunction Rose. As city manager of Steam- • (11:00 z:3o s.9o) Tao 1(too with the Winter Park Ski Area. boat Springs, Rose helped win an c13) • t11:1sz:15sits)T:10950 ?he Glitter and Glamour of Still, the reggae festival will unusual $150,000 grant to plan • (11:301ss 5:40) ~5s 1a1o continue, and more events ma be (12:35 3:00 5:45) 8.00 ?55 Y and fund arts activities in the re- PcI7J (112o r.1o s:3o) 7:so pursued, O'Hanlon said. "There's sort area.'•Now as a member of aiT 1) (11:IOx505:10) 1016 such an obvious cause and effect, NEA rants anel, Rose sees what ~'Q.os? ; there's no reason to dissect it" by it's like "onthe other side o[ the breaking out what sales tax nTOrreY table." Winner of 6 Tony Awards! comes from the string of July festi- "The NEA has obviously seen a 'c13) 11501:1s s:1o 7~0 9:5s ; vats. "We're such amicro-econo- different emphasis on grants," vES (PG13) 1:15 4:4s 1:15: my that if it s a down year, festival said Rose. "Economic develop- s:1o 7:4s loan wise, July is flat (on tax). 1f it's a ment is now a consideration." In ;Mes(R) 124 s0o ago 10:10: , 1190 1:30 ~ big year, July is up." his town, arts progra?nming "at- IcE1c1 17:m And in Carbondale, the people tracts a different kind of tourist, a who benefit from the annual tourist who spends more money, ~ ' ~ ! Mountain Fair know that there is a than those attending athletic comfort level in wlTich festival and events." town find a balance. Thus when the city matched the The recent three-day arts and NEA grant with $300,000, it was a music festival - a major fund- shift in attitude. "Before that, the ~ THE MIIUCLf raiser for the Carbondale Council city government considered the evECU~ « bE,~, on the Arts and HunTanities in arts council one of the most potent DARK OBBlSSION INC., 71 rr 1 ,5 3:70 5.90 7:20 9,20 late July drew more than 20,000 forces in the community, Rose SvKUI ENGAOE4EN1 eo le to the town of about 3,000 said, "but the never reap ? TNELMA a IAUISE IRI ~ I P P Y Y ,2:70 9.5 I 8 ~ ' said Thomas Lawley, council di- worked with them." DEUR1ouB Iii 200 loo e.oo e~oo ,o 00 ~ rector. Or as arts consortium president 1 t.7~•CV.t [E.UAOEYfNt That may be enough, he said. Dodd says, "lf you give people The fair has grown; in its 20th something cultural to do, it helps year, to be both a celebration [or everybody." , N OOIe~ S7ERE0 i • RIII/MAT011 t IR) (fY' ~ lrT9TT11T DATt 15 ~I>1 1 - AN PREVIEW E.90 • I ~~R'NOVOI~E;rs( ~~~QBAAOAIN TODAY ~nnn sTEREo ~~t; I . troll M T~tiE t ooD lR) N O W SHOWING wREBEOarrCES N(PlrEtltl{S61 tZ~s 7D^ 5.15.4pj1 COOPER a FESTIVAL e ~ - T H E A ~ n E • . - ' • - taTa+o» P(ia7) ez7ow eom4..e. 4nwsz elsostlria~ tfd eso9au _ . 1:457f554545015 M ~ ~ ~stelFr ncFANr PLAZA sExtclNCNAt4 v[e a !Z NT III - NO PASSES ? -SPEC. ENG. 8 NO PASSES).. SPECIAL ENGAGEME WRE IVCR IMi) 700 E NnnpUEn 220900 Hovnnn 6 Mn+ico 7509970 ,.OS 7105,5710975 • r • - SE'L(,lAt ENGAGE 4[N, COOPERS 9etl, DRIVE-IN E _ • E , , b C.n•mW{ 7fie~0210 E ee0.6 Roa.mery 2e7 7717 cNERRr cREE,Ee mou ttnEEATRES •pOC HOLLYWOOD (PGt9)(12002001:15)7259:15: * • ROBIN•HOOD (PG t9) • 7000E ,el Av 9771519 9,h8 Dime. 5711000 THE DOCTORIPGt91 (11901:15 1001 700 10 05: n~1s 4:Ir$) NS 10:95 NOT SHOTS IPC ul REGARDING H NR (PG1~ (100) 700 B00 1:45 J.45 545 7:45 9'45 SOllTIIWFST ?LAZA S OREEN MOt1N'TAIN 6 TERMINATOR II ((R) a (10:15100120 7:15 10:15: ~ - ' • ' • ePFCUI ENpApEMEN1 S. w•eswth n Hamlet, Pleze~ 101 DALMATIANS G) (11001:1 300) 6:05 ' W. Baase 9746766 L/[swood 9e7~e9c7 ~ BILL AND iED (PS_) a 7:1510:00 BIN00 IPGI CRY SLICKERS ( t (t11:15 225 5:15117A510:15 lP0 t:DD 700 s:0o 7:00 9:00 vtuu E•aeE•E+, -•m •/ul / oR n/eou•, ,an n .cern,n R08141t100D (PGt9)~`.04+ BLUE 1AG06l111:151:45 BLUE LAti00N 1~ a (1200 2:15? ePE04t ENpAOEYENI CMl Ce 1NE A,Rf lgllet:/FOR /MUMb•!/ Y08STERS (R1 (11:J02901a0~700 P.~O TERMINATOR SIR1 • ' ! . ; ; . pEGARD. N Y(PGt71 11A52:151:IS 7:159:10 E 4s 4:7o rs ,o:o0 101 DALMATIAN~G) a (12 00 2 00 100)605 ; BODY PARTS R) 7;15 1000: CRY SLICKERS 19) (12 00 2 00 500) 7301000 ~ ~ E ( POINT BREAK(( a It 1:15 /A5 10:10 • •HOT 5H018 (PG 1~ a (12A5 300 500) 700 9:15: BODY PARTS ((R) a t~) 700 DELIRIOUS (PG) a (12:15 200 4:15) 745 9:90 THELMA i LOUtSE (RI ? p 00 )a5 10 00 ' i I 81NG0 (PG) (1200 2:15 4:30) 700 9:00: DELIRIOUS (PG) a (12:15 700 5:1~) 700 9:45 80YZ M THE HOOD (R) 112:15 2A5 5:15) 7:1510:15: BINGO (PL~E a (100 900 5:70) 7:15 950 NAKED GUM 2 (PG 19) (100 3:15 500) ?PURE LUCK (PG) (12:15 2:15 5:15) 7:10 9:50 r ALL4UOROt11UHFE0UiPEDEPITN 97!11!0! lPEtIAI _ RFMt1ED90V109TSTEYSl Oe MENLAlING 9i/FEEDI ' • ROBIN H000 PGt9 (1:15 4:15 120 1025 ' • - E E NO • - . ~ ~ , ` TERMINATOR~I(R)) (1102:15500 7:151025 : A~~LYyrD•1(PGt7).+(I2A02:15590)7:1S9:d5 . 101 DALMATIANS ~G) (1200200100 6:06: BLUE LAGOON (PG19) + (1120 100 CRY SUCKERS (P~r t3) (100! 7:15 ryARSHAWSKI (pR~) a 1100 2001 AS 700 10At~ I NAKED GUN 2 (PGt ~ 12:15 5.00) if:15 • PURE LUCK ( (1220 2 100) 7. 9:15: MOBSTERS a 12:15 200 5:15 7:15 10:15 DOUBLE IMPACT (R) (12:302:155:10)7001000: ~THEDOCTO POt + 11001A012S 7201000 Thornton ~ MuStC g SAOt0:15 : CfTTSUCKER~PGt~ a 1200200500 1001000 Pinnacle Centre and Lyrics by E • E : • tiu4E9wuw r9 ErrE~rw~TETMiENE~uIIDNO11rAwI~EOI 9199 N. We/MnpSOn Stephen Sondheim ~ BODY PARTS (R) a 500 10:15 • . . $ S 2-8 6 ~ ll REG. HENRY (PGt ~ a (11 915 2 00 1 30) 1000 AN ENCHANTED MUSICAL! 10tDALMATlAN3(G) a (1200200100)6.05: BODY PARTS (R AS 700900 OS01 DFAO RtED (?i •N) ROBIN HOOD (PG-1'g (100 400) 700 1090 BILL AND TED .(PG1 (12:15 2;45 S:t51~S010:15 1:15 3:15 5:15 7:15 9:15 "...witty enough for Gdults, ROCKETEER (PG) (100 5:15) 500 - REG. NENRY 1 a f11;15 2 00 1001 7:10 9.15 . aD~ MDSE lovel enou h to NAKED GUN 2 (PG19) 300 7;20: CRY Sl1CKE ~ (1t00 2:15 5.90 )A010.00 215 7:00 y g OOUBIE IMPACT (R) (11;15 2:151;15) 7001000 ; ~ a (1:151:15 720 1025 SSHCE OT ~ uN?= (A~ enchorit children" a BLUE LAGOON (VGt 1220 200) 12:30 2 45 5:00 7:15 9: PURE LUCK (PG) + (1110 1;!51:15) 7:15 0:90 ~ r • aB31E1tm5ttttlerlPl "...They lived . • E , - 12:45 145 9:n0 happily eve! after. t ~ DOC HOLLYW00 PGt DOUBLE IMPACT (A) (100 940 520) 720 9:15 Soar IIInI rartl (K-15) MAYBE." D~ 3) (11:15 I:IS 1:30) 700 5.15: WARSHI4Y/SKI ~R~ 705 g,~ 1:00 4:30 8:30 S~ tOt DALMATIANS (G) (12.90100100) 6.95 ; BOYZ IN THE HOOD (12:15 230 500) 700 555 INRSTtEdIEO (K) BINGO (PG) (11301001:15) IAO 9:15. 101 DALMATIANS (G~ 1200 2 W 10016.06 . 11:15 2:00 3:45 5:30 MOBSTERS (R) ROCKETEER PG (12. 2:10 S 00 1:45 9:50 OQT 1XE LOIRii (KI 1 t ~ ` " " - • ' , r E PURE LUCK (~PG~1 ~ (12:10 250 5 10) 700 9.15 7:35 9:35 ~I D~U1Atl !(ULlf, DlSN Fs ~ 2 • uaicaial ia:tu •prsus cnc rren ~ , AUG-26-9i MON i1~10 1 r~Q~rl~z~r xoxtBi~srrr Data: ~ . ?oa (CHI Ci-editor Receiving Draft plan ot;aeox~gatsisation ~ 'farm 8haotl . You tray 3Adiv3dnall.y reveive, or through yawr ointment to nerves oa sn o#ffdial axeRitore~ aoaawit~Ces, be gupFlie~l Mith, a draft Plan of Bsorgna3satiab and a Tana S~sat ~oollective~.y, the 'Draft Piaa~) xhioh oa~ntain intorraaCioa of as eeaait3ve aud' oOnfidantiai t?ature aoaoerafag Gillett Holdings, Ytic • , debtor and debtorin-pp80gse~iao, and/or its affl.liatea (oolleatfvsly, "GRi~) . Yn Consi+dera~tiaa of tiSI as~d its advisors furAiahing you Stith a Dopy of the graft plan, end bg year aekagkl.edgenent sa set t~,«.t?h beloFr, 7ou agree to. the followi.nga • ' ~en8~sglesnra e=±ha. ~r~,tipi>~n. You a„a~e t0 ttsat as Rttiotty eo:tfidegtinl, in acoordaACO with the provieiva8 Of this Confidentiality ~1~~..~e>nent, the draft Plan. ;Ali tangible materials prepared by you or Your RgprQSQatatives fns deffnred bolow) containing or tefe~:rioq to th8 Draft play `:xill remain sub~lact to tLis ConfidaAtialfty Agreement. ~CouNe~c. ate~baR~ 1 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the raft Plan Mich you recgioe nay be. disciQSed by you to eny of your officers, eApLoyes6, agents, representatives, ,advisors, oonsultttnte, experts or legal, counsel (collectively, ~itepreseatatives') , flrovidsd that Bach Raprosontatives shall ba inf~~..we8 by you of the aaafidential nature of the Draft Plan and the subr~ltaace of this Confidentialityy Agseeneat, and such Repreaontatives >Dhall be instrvated by you axed shall agree to treat•ths or4ft Plan pursuant to 'the terms of thin ConfideaCielity Agreement, ~„~~v±eed t~a~ fihe Dra#t Plan ~y be Qiecioaed to any member of the Sank Group.•~oan participant or assigaq• at your claimQ ag8iast GKi, progided such Bank Group member, loan pal'tiCipaAt or aaBignee has exeauts~l a eimi.lar ao~afidsntiality agreement With GKx. Z. gQ~,,+,~e~re~~,;,~,>sa r~rr?ve~ led a=~,~re~ea D3~a Dears. If you or any of your btspresentativas are :required, subpoenaed, cvaiptlled or ordered is n jr`tdiaiaZ proceadinq, or itt say other g„~. ~rnmentai or reguintvey ~proce~inq, tp: disoloea nay of the Costtent6 of th• Draft Plaa, or if you detprtstiat that it is Aeaessaxy to file ar orally diaclo$e any of the COritettts of the Otaft Plan with the bankruptcy court is ;tsonaeation with your antivities in the bankruptcy case of Gili+att Holdings, Ina. tonited Btatea 8ankxuptoy Court for Lhe District of Colorado, Case Bo. 9i- 12465-SBS)= you 6bali prcaptiy notify tiHf (iA oar® of 1~oshpatt Btoimeteia, . 13-.~~~W,at®iss HYstt lashes & Meddea, p.C. , d30 iTth street, Y'WOnty-second Floor, Deaver, Colorado 8oZ0~-d468~, is oz~er to permit dHl to 6aek a protective order os to take other si :ss s t+.na pLlG-26-9 L MOt-1 , . i i app....~.,riate action to preserve the aoafidenti4lity of the Draft Plan. 3, Caria_r~7 p visions. Thus Confidentiality Agreement • will be bindiAg oa sad! inure to th® beaefi~ of the partfse hszeto and their respective auaoeeeors. Tbis Copfidegtldlitx •8s.~.emsat ' sha11 be governed by and construed 3a ®oaordaace with the la~ra of the State of Cvloxsdo, without giving effrict to its vonfliot of laws thereof. This Confidentiality hq~eemoAt shall wcpise on th® earlier of November 1, 1991 os the filing of a OisCloauge Qtate~a®nt by GRt with tt16 bankruptcy court a~ve-indicated. Nothing herein shnli ifnit or waive aAy sights or dung's of either migaatorY hereto that may axlst under any prior aoa~identiality agreement'. If you a,~..:,e to ba bovnfl in acao~aace ~rit~ the fdsegeiug, pleose so fndiaate by signing And returnis~ one copy of th~ie letter tp tba ucsdereiyned. ' Very tz~ily you~re, ' GILLSTT~ 'H~LDIAIGS, 7[liC By: Name ~'itle: Confirmed and aa..+.e8 tc~ as of , the data of this latter. ti $Y= ~ •Hame Titl.ec • . ~ ' Z ' ~ ' ~=i~~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1991 1:00 P.M. REVISED EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 p.m. 1. PEC Report 1:10 p.m. 2. DRB Report 1:15 p.m. 3. Trapping in Eagle County -Committee Update Ken Hughey Bob Slagle Backaround Rationale: On July 30, 1991, Town Council directed parties involved in the trapping issue to meet as a committee and reach a consensus to pass on to the Colorado Wildlife Commission. The TOV representative, Bob Slagle, will update the Council on the progress so far. 1:30 p.m. 4. Discussion: State of Colorado Department of Local Impact Jill Kammerer Assistance Program Grant Application for Public Facilities/Community Development Projects Action Reauested of Council: To submit, in conjunction with the Housing Authority, an Energy Impact Assistance Program Grant application for $300,000 by the September 1, 1991 deadline. Backaround Rationale: The Colorado State Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) has recognized the need for affordable housing in resort impacted communities in Colorado. Last year Steamboat Springs, Telluride, Snowmass, and Breckenridge received funding from the Impact Assistance Program for housing projects. DOLA has indicated a willingness to work with Vail on an affordable housing project. The consulting firm of Rosall Remmen & Cares (RCC) of Boulder, Colorado has been working with the Housing Authority in identifying funding sources for affordable housing projects. In telephone conversations with DOLA this past week, RCC learned of the applicability of the Energy Impact Assistance funds for funding land acquisition and infrastructure costs for affordable housing projects and of the September 1, 1991 application deadline. DOLA will allow any application by the Town to be modified up until the December, 1991 final application review date. If it is determined that the most appropriate site for construction of the affordable housing project under consideration is Town owned, the Town may be asked to contribute the land. Prior to the December 1st meeting of the Energy Impact Advisory Committee, the Eagle County Commissioners will need to be consulted concerning their endorsement of the project and project prioritization should other applications from Eagle County be submitted for this program. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Staff to proceed with preparation and submission of the Energy Impact Assistance Grant application for the amount of $300,000 to fund affordable housing project related costs. 1:45 p.m. 5. Joint Work Session with the Town Council, Planning and Kristan Pritz Environmental Commission, and Housing Authority concerning Jill Kammerer employee housing requirements for Special Development Districts (SDDsj and the proposed Zoning Code amendments related to providing employee housing Backaround Rationale: The purpose of the Work Session is to give members the opportunity to comment on the proposed affordable housing requirements for Special Development Districts and to review the proposed Zoning Code amendments related to affordable housing. The PEC has already recommended approval of the code amendments with minor changes. 3:45 p.m. 6. Discussion of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code to Mike Mollica provide for the implementation of the Employee Housing Study Jill Kammerer Phase I recommendations, including the creation of a new Chapter in the Code entitled Employee Housing, and setting forth the details with regard thereto Action Requested of Council: No formal action is required at this time, however, feedback on the proposed amendments will assist the Staff in the drafting of the final ordinance. Backaround Rationale: The PEC reviewed the employee housing amendments on August 12, 1991. First reading of the ordinance will be presented to Council on September 3, 1991. 4:30 p.m. 7. Information Update 8. Other 9. Executive Session- Consultation with the Town Attorney regarding specific legal matters 10. Adjournment CiAGENDA.WSE F~~ ~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1991 1:00 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 p.m. 1. PEC Report 1:10 p.m. 2. DRB Report 1:15 p.m. 3. Trapping in Eagle County -Committee Update Ken Hughey Bob Slagle Backaround Rationale: On July 30, 1991, Town Council directed parties involved in the trapping issue to meet as a committee and reach a consensus to pass on to the Colorado Wildlife Commission. The TOV representative, Bob Slagle, will update the Council on the progress so far. 1:30 p.m. 4. Discussion: State of Colorado Department of Local Impact Jill Kammerer Assistance Program Grant Application for Public Facilities/Community Development Projects Action Requested of Council: To submit, in conjunction with the Housing Authority, an Energy Impact Assistance Program Grant application for $300,000 by the September 1, 1991 deadline. Backaround Rationale: The Colorado State Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) has recognized the need for affordable housing in resort impacted communities in Colorado. Last year Steamboat Springs, Telluride, Snowmass, and Breckenridge received funding from the Impact Assistance Program for housing projects. DOLA has indicated a willingness to work with Vail on an affordable housing project. The consulting firm of Rosail Remmen & Cares (RCC) of Boulder, Colorado has been working with the Housing Authority in identifying funding sources for affordable housing projects. In telephone conversations with DOLA this past week, RCC learned of the applicability of the Energy Impact Assistance funds for funding land acquisition and infrastructure costs for affordable housing projects and of the September 1, 1991 application deadline. DOLA will allow any application by the Town to be modified up until the December, 1991 final application review date. If it is determined that the most appropriate site for construction of the affordable housing project under consideration is Town owned, the Town may be asked to contribute the land. Prior to the December 1st meeting of the Energy Impact Advisory Committee, the Eagle County Commissioners will need to be consulted concerning their endorsement of the project and project prioritization should other applications from Eagle County be submitted for this program. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Staff to proceed with preparation and submission of the Energy Impact Assistance Grant application for the amount of $300,000 to fund affordable housing project related costs. 1:45 p.m. 5. Joint Work Session with the Town Council, Planning and Kristan Pritz Environmental Commission, and Housing Authority concerning Jill Kammerer employee housing requirements for Special Development Districts (SDDs) and the proposed Zoning Code amendments related to providing employee housing Backaround Rationale: The purpose of the Work Session is to give members the opportunity to comment on the proposed affordable housing requirements for Special Development Districts and to review the proposed Zoning Code amendments related to affordable housing. The PEC has already recommended approval of the code amendments with minor changes. 3:45 p.m. 6. Discussion of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code to Mike Mollica provide for the implementation of the Employee Housing Study Jill Kammerer Phase I recommendations, including the creation of a new Chapter in the Code entitled Employee Housing, and setting forth the details with regard thereto Action Requested of Council: No formal action is required at this time, however, feedback on the proposed amendments will assist the Staff in the drafting of the final ordinance. Backaround Rationale: The PEC reviewed the employee housing amendments on August 12, 1991. First reading of the ordinance will be presented to Council on September 3, 1991. 4:30 p.m. 7. Information Update 8. Other 9. Adjournment C:WGENDA.WSE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION August 26, 1991 AGENDA 2:30PM Site Visits 3:OOPM Public Hearing Site Visits Public Hearinq 1. An appeal of a staff decision concerning a density variance granted to Treetops Condominiums, Lot 6, Block 1, Vail Lionshead First Filing/452 East Lionshead Circle. Appellant: Treetops Condominium Association Planner: Mike Mollica 2. A request for an exterior alteration of Crazy Shirts, Unit 2, Bridge Street Condos, Bridge Street Building, 250 Bridge Street/Lot D, Block 56, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: The Mainland Co., Inc. Planner: Jill Kammerer TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 3. A request for a major amendment to Special Development District No. 2, Pinos del Norte, Building C, Northwoods Condominiums/600 Vail Valley Drive. Applicant: Pinos del Norte Condominium Association Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 4. A request for an exterior alteration for the May Palace, 223 East Gore Creek Drive/A part of Block 56, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Henry Woo Planner: Shelly Mello TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 5. A request for a wall height variance for the Chester Residence, Lot 19, Block 1, Vail Village 1st Filing/395 Mill Creek Circle. Applicant: E.B. Chester - Planner: Kristan Pritz TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 23, 1991 6. A request for a side setback variance for the Bigelow Residence, Texas Townhouses, 43 Gore Creek Drive, Unit 46/Lot 4, Vail Village Fourth Filing. Applicant: Thayer Bigelow Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED INDEFINITELY 7. A request for a worksession to rezone property from Primary/Secondary to Low Density Multiple Family, generally located at 2239 Chamonix Lane/Parcels A and B, generally located north of Pine Ridge Condominiums. Applicant: Erich and Lily Schmetzko Planner: Andy Knudtsen TABLED INDEFINITELY 8. Appoint PEC member to serve as PEC representative to the Design Review Board. 9. Reminder of August 27, 1991 joint worksession with Town Council and Housing Authority to review Rosall, Remmen and Cares report regarding number of employees generated by commercial uses and presentation on Employee Housing Unit zoning code amendments. The information on number of employees generated is proposed to be incorporated into the Employee Housing Unit SDD. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA AUGUST 21, 1991 3:00 P.M. REVISED 8/20/91 5:00 P.M. SITE VISITS 1:15 p.m. 1 Shanley - 864 Spruce Court 2 Tupy Residence - 1901 Chamonix Lane 3 Chalets at Buffehr Creek - The Valley, Phase VI 4 Vlaar - 2963 Bellflower Drive 5 Stone Residence - 1241 Westhaven Drive 6 T-Lame - Crossroads Mall 7 Daily Grind - 288 Bridge Street ' 8 Village Popcorn Wagon - Founder's Plaza, Top of Wall Street 9 East Vail Bike Path - Bighorn Road right-of-way in the 4600-5100 block. AGENDA 1. Lauterbach - New Primary/Secondary Residence JK 1458 Greenhill Court/Lot 21, Glen Lyon Subdivision MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED 2. Village Popcorn Wagon - Sign Variance and Awning BR Founder's Plaza, Top of Wall Street MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 4TH MEETING. 3. Chalets at Buffehr Creek - Development Sign BR The Valley Phase VI ` MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED TO SEPTEMBER 4TH MEETING. 4. T-Lame - New Sign BR 143 East Meadow Drive/Crossroads Mall MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 5. Daily Grind - Menu Board location BR 288 Bridge Street/Otto Stork Building MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 6. Stone - New Primary/Secondary Residence SM 1241 Westhaven Drive/Lot 44, Glen Lyon Subdivision MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 3-0 Conceptual approval. 7. Vlaar - New Dormer SM 2963 Bellflower Drive/Lot 7, Block 6, Intermountain MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Conceptual consent approved. 8. Lodge Tower Sign Variance SM 200 Vail Road/Lot A, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED 9. Herdich - Revision to landscape plan SM 2008 Sunburst Drive/Lot 18, Vail Village 3rd MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: STAFF APPROVED. 10. Vail Recreation District - New signage SM 292 West Meadow Drive MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 1. Soccer Field 10 sq. ft. total. 2. Ford Park signs to be resubmitted. 3. Add white to directional signs to make readable. t 11. Allen - Storage Shed AK 2992-B Bellflower Drive/Lot 1, Block 6,~Resub. of Lot 10, Intermountain MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: TABLED 12. Tupy - CONCEPTUAL New Primary/Secondary Residence AK 1901 Chamonix Lane/Lot 33, Buffehr Creek Subdivision MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Conceptual review. 13. Shanley - Garage and Addition AK 864 Spruce Court/Lot 12, Vail Village 9th MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 Approved with the conditions that prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall modify the plans so that 1. The supports under the deck are 12" x 12". 2. Identify a revised fence location which is acceptable to staff. 14. East Vail Bike Path - Retaining Wall AK Bighorn Road right-of-way in the 4600-5100 Block MOTION: Pat Herrington SECOND: Chuck Crist VOTE: 4-0 The construction, described below, was approved by DRB on August 21, 1991. 1. Walls to be constructed out of boulders. 2. Walls shall not exceed 6 feet. 3. Construction area will be reseeded with hydroseed/poppy seed mix. 4. Curb & gutter will be constructed at base of boulder walls. 15. Vail Gateway Plaza - Sidewalk along the east side AK 'tip of Vail Road; from the southwest corner~of the Gateway site, south to the intersection of.Vail Road and East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Leo Palmer MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Approved with the conditions that the applicant 1. Relocate existing VVI lights, maintaining the same number of lights; and 2. Use pavers to construct the sidewallc that are consistent with the streetscape plan. 16. Ski Heritage Center - New Sign MD 241 E. Meadow Drive/Nail Village Transportation Center MOTION: George Lamb SECOND: Pat Herrington VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Ned Gwathmey Sherry Dorward Pat Herrington George Lamb Chuck Crist (PEC) STAFF APPROVALS: Butts Residence - Sky Light Holiday House Unit #43 Kurtz - ReRoof Lot 4, Block A, Vail Das Schone #2 Eilert/Welch Exterior Repaint Lot 7, Block 4, Bighorn Subdivision 5th Lia Zneimer Subdivision Lot 3 - Increase height of structure to 32'6". Lot 3, Lia Zneimer Subdivision Biederman Resid. - Railings on roof. Lot 7, Block 33, Vail Village 1st Bag & Pack Shop - Move Sign Village Center Building Station Verbier, Inc. - New Awning Vail Village Inn Plaza McGill Residence - Change retaining walls from Timbers to Boulders. Lots 4 & 5, Cliffside Lia Zneimer Lot 3 - Raise building, increase height. Lot 3, Lia Zneimer Subdivision Kellam ReRoof - Replacement of roof shingles with fiberglass/asphalt. Lot 11, Vail Meadows #1 Miller/Scweinsberg - Driveway/grading/walls. Lot 7, Block 1, Vail Intermountain Renner Exterior paint, Printery Building. Tract A, Block D, Lionsridge #1 Vail Heights - Maintenance to decks. Vail Interfaith Chapel - Bench. Tract J, Vail Village 1st The Roost - Awning on west side of building. Lots 9,10,11,12, Resub. Buffehr Creek Lund Residence Landscaping - Add landscaping, revise plan from building permit. Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing Alpine Townhomes VIII - Window and deck modification's to previously approved plans. Lot 34, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch Wittemyer Residence - New door and window, west elevation of garage. Timber stairs, Plexiglas bubble over gondola terminal. Lot 1, Block 1, Vail Village 3rd Precourt Residence - Changes to approved plan. Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Village 1st Lowe Residence - Repaint. Lot 14, Bighorn 4th Station Verbier - Replace operable windows w/fixed windows. Vail village Inn Plaza Gondos Restaurant - Fencing to define outdoor dining area. Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Pock Deck Extension - ground level. Timberfalls Unit #1001 The Eagle's Nest - Changes to previously approved plans, per submittal. Lot 4, Block 3, Bighorn 3rd Ford Park Tree Removal/Replacement. 530 Frontage Road East Peter Rudy Deck Replacement - Replace existing dec}c with identical deck. Grouse Glen Unit #4B MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council ~ . Planning and Environmental Commission Housing Authority FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 27, 1991 SUBJECT: Joint worksession with the Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission and Housing Authority concerning employee housing requirements for Special Development Districts (SDDs) and the proposed zoning code amendments related to providing employee housing. ,vN.vvxN,. ; .~N.~.....,,.. . t •.:::t.:: nv . :vJ~.~w;.unvr, n v: i'}}„v..vm:}y},,,,,, rr. . "n. v .:::::.::::..~::::nv::i}y:::::. v. n.. au..u.. r...rwx '•'.t' .uw.4ifwiii.w.e... rv r'LF Attached to this memo is the draft report from Rosall, Remmen and Cares concerning the suggested approach to applying a formula for generating employee housing, based on the type of commercial and/or residential development. This information will be utilized in a zoning code amendment concerning Special Development Districts. Below is a list of questions which will be helpful to answer in order to proceed with revising the employee housing section of the Special Development District chapter of the code. 1. What type of projects should be required to provide employee housing? - Any SDD? - SDDs which exceed allowed residential and/or commercial square footage? - variances, etc. 2. What percentage of employee housing is appropriate to require? 3. Should a developer be able to satisfy an employee housing requirement with payment in lieu or a donation of land as opposed to actually constructing a unit? 4. Should a developer be able to place restrictions on existing units in order to satisfy an employee housing requirement? 5. Is it appropriate to include provisions that relate to the amount of rent that may be charged for required employee housing units? 6. Should required employee housing units only be used for long-term rentals, or should for-sale units to employees in the Town of Vail also be allowed? The Council and Planning and Environmental Commission have discussed these issues in general. The purpose of this worksession will be to get definitive direction on the above questions. 4 ROSALL REMMEN CARES PLANNING. URBAN DESIGN AND RESEARCH c J _ ~ E C ~ ! C c c E _ . ~ . _~c-_=_.= MEMORANDUM TO: Kristan Pritz and Members of the Housing Authority FROM: Chris Cares RE: Suggested Approach to Applying a Formula for Employee Housing DATE: July 15, 1991 (Revised) Attached is the report describing the results of the Rosall, Remmen and Cares, Inc. (RRC) analysis of commercial and residential employment generation rates. The report documents the levels of employment that are found in resort towns based on a comprehensive analysis conducted in 1990/91. Its purpose is to provide background information and the more technical underpinnings for the recommendations that we are presenting in this Memorandum. In the discussion that follows, we have identified what we consider to be important considerations for the Town of Vail as you consider alternative formulas for evaluating and regulating new development in the Town. On page 4 of this Memorandum we have presented a chart that summarizes the results of the Background Analysis Report and suggests ranges that might be used as standards by the Town of Vail. It is anticipated that a chart similar to this, but without the specific identification of RRC findings, might be adopted into the Town's Land Use Code. The chart could either be a part of the SDD requirements, or "free-standing", meaning that it could be used to determine requirements for ` other processes beyond just the SDD section. Clearly, we need the input of Larry E. and others, but our intention was to present the numbers in a flexible format. A first consideration is whether you want to impose requirements on just new commercial/lodging construction, or on new residential that exceeds the amount of development allowed by the underlying zoning. The rationale for just commercial/lodging standards is that these types of development are the source of both permanent and seasonal employees. Typically, unmanaged residential units result in construction employment during an interim period, and the expenditures for this development creates ongoing economic impacts in the community; however, once constructed, unmanaged residential units do not usually have employees. 4 ' ROSALL REMMEN CARES P~FN'~:NG UFE~N DESIGN Ar,D RESE~?.C~! We suggest that Vail adopt an approach that uses a formula that will apply to only new commercial and lodging related construction at this time. In other words, we believe regulating the commercial side of the equation is the most logical and expedient way to create standards. We have also identified some typical residential employment rates in the standards that are attached, based on code provisions from other communities. This is to provide you with measures should you wish to include residential generation figures either at this time or at some later date as part of another section of the code that expands on SDD requirements. In a further consideration, you may also want to insert a section into the SDD Code that requires construction impacts to be addressed; however, it is our opinion that to try to create a formula to address what amounts to a seasonal problem, and one that is often of limited duration, is difficult. As shown in the attached report, there is wide variation in the numbers of employees that are typically generated by various types of commercial activity. As a result, we believe that the formula should differentiate between several categories of commercial activity. Ideally, you would identify enough categories to cover the majority of applications, but not try to create so many subcategories that we imply a level of precision in our measurements that we do not actually have. In addition, we feel that the requirement should be expressed as a range (as Aspen does it) with the opportunity for a particular applicant to justify the anticipated employment activity that will be generated by the proposed use, or mix of uses. We have chosen the categories of employment that are shown in the chart (for example, retail- grocery, liquor, convenience; or office-financial) based on our analysis. We found that there is wide variation in the employment generation rates that are found in resort communities within a single broad category such as "offices." Many codes do not make this distinction, but we felt that it was important in Vail to anticipate that employment rates will vary between, say, a grocery store and a ski shop. Both might be called "retail" but the standards should anticipate the diversity that exists, and ideally should be tied to the actual data collected from the resort towns. We have shown a fairly wide range on the table that follows below, which could be adjusted to be made narrower, closer to a "mean", or average. The range around the mean could be utilized by staff as a standard basis or criteria in the review. The applicant, if he/she believes the particular mean is not representative of his project, could then prepare and submit a report which documents anticipated employment as a part of the SDD (or any other Town process) application. Because one can anticipate that there will be pressures to underestimate employment it may be desirable to provide some guidelines in the code as to content and expertise required to prepare a report. For example, the report should present anticipated gross square feet and an estimate of "usable area." This should then be tied to estimates of employees expected to be generated by the type of use. Finally, the applicant should be required to indicate why the requested standards deviate from the adopted Town averages (if they do), and to present some documentation of rationale based either on current local employment, examples from other comparable communities and/or land uses, and any other documentation that is deemed relevant. The report could be required to be prepared by a "qualified professional" (many ordinances have this requirement). The report would then be reviewed by the PEC and Town Council as part of the overall SDD. ROSALL REMMEN CARES PLANN1NG URBAN DESIGN AND RESEARCH In the numbers that we have provided to you it is important to remember that the estimates were prepared during the peak season. There is also multiple job holding that occurs, meaning that the new employee at a retail shop is likely to be working a second job. We have taken the multiple job holding into account in our standards, but have not tried to reconcile differences between summer and winter employment. We suggest that this be done through the percentage standard that you adopt (35 percent, 30 percent or whatever). On the following page we have presented several categories of uses and a range of employment figures to serve as a base for discussions. As shown, we feel that it is important to differentiate lodge units from other types of new construction, especially in Vail, and these employment impacts are probably most easily measured using numbers of rooms. Further, we find that there are three identifiable "tiers" or thresholds of lodging employment that should be anticipated. Our formulas take the existing "real world" variations into account. We hope that this outline of standards, together with the supporting report, assists in your discussions concerning the appropriate requirements and approach for the Town. There is considerable data available to support our conclusions and we will be happy to provide additional information should the need arise. J ROSALL REMMEN CARES PL a':°~ NG UF3rN DESIGN aND FESEaaCH SUGGESTED EMPLOYMENT CATEGORIES AND RANGES FOR VATL EXPRESSED AS EMPLOYEES IPEtt 1000 SQUARE FEET RRC RESEARCH OVERALL SUGGESTED AVERAGES RANGE Bar/Restaurant 5.7/1000 s.f. 5-8/1000 s.f. Retail and Service Commercial 5.9/1000 5-8/1000 Retail: Grocery/Liquor/Convenience 1.8/1000 1.5-3/1000 Office: Real Estate 7.6/1000 6-9/1000 Office: Financial 3.1/1000 2.5-4/1000 Office: Professional/Other 6.6/1000 5-8/1000 Conference Center NA 1/1000 Health Club NA 1-1.5/1000 Lodging* 1.3/room .25-1.25/room Local Government 6.5/1000 5-8/1000 Construction (Offices, Interior Storage, etc.) 10.6/1000 9-13/1000 Multi-Family N/A 0.4/unit Single Family N/A 0.2/unit Other: To be determined through the SDD process, upon submission of adequate documentation and a review of the application materials. * Lodging/accommodations has particularly large variation of employees per room, depending . upon factors such as size of facility and level of service/support facilities and amenities provided. The standards present a wide range of employment, but it is anticipated that a definitive report will be submitted by each lodging property requesting an expansion, which would then be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. EMPLOYMENT GENERATION RATES A Background Analysis Based on Survey Research June 1991 ROSALL RF1vII~ff.N CARFS EMPLOYMENT GENERATION RATES INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of survey research conducted in several ski/tourism communities. It reviews the results from questionnaires addressed to employers that, among other topics, explored the relationship between the number of square feet (s.f.) in the commercial establishment and the number of employees working in the particular business. These surveys were conducted in Eagle (136 interviews), Routt (174), Summit (242), Pitkin (169), and Blaine (Sun Valley/Ketchum-162 interviews) Counties and Estes Park (224). The sample includes 1,107 commercial and governmental establishments ranging in size from the smallest to largest in the various counties. This information is presented to the Town of Vail to assist in discussions concerning the appropriate standards for adoption into proposed Code amendments, with particular application to the SDD process. A number of different "cuts" at the data are presented that allow overall total measures to be developed, along with some figures describing the situation in Eagle County, and specifically within the Town of Vail. In addition to the various commercial/employment figures, several other attachments have been provided. These include: • Excerpts from a report that provides an overview of "linkage" programs and describing the status of such programs in a variety of commutities. Linkage is a term that is used to describe codes or requirements that tie new development to requirements for providing funds or mitigation to meet the identifiable impacts associated with the new development. Such programs are in various stages of evolution, and are relatively uncommon in the mountain towns. Nevertheless, there are proven examples that merit attention. • A summary of the current Aspen and Pitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines for determining "Generation of Employee Units" by various land use categories. • An excerpt from a field survey of establishments conducted by the Director of Community Development in the Town of Breckenridge. It is showing employment levels that are similar w those being obtained through the RRC study. ~NDWGS AND CONCLUSIONS As shown in the Appendix tables and in the graphs on the following pages; there is wide variation in the number of employees generated by the various types of commercial activity. For example, the Figures portray the average number of employees per 1,000 square feet by business type, and they also show the average number of square feet per employee (both calculations combine two different measures of commercial activity). The average number of employees in retail businesses in the ski/tourist towns surveyed is 11.3 but the number of reported employees ranges from 1 to 155 per establishment. Obviously, it is difficult to generate a single measure that will perfectly describe the situation within the wide range of retail establishments that exist. Similarly, the average number of employees per 1,000 s.f. was found to be 4.36, but it also showed wide variation. ROSALL RD~SFN CARES PAGE 1 EMPIAYMENT GENERATION RATES The figures portray results based on the aggregate of all the resort communities. Although there was discussion of developing standards based on just Eagle County or Town of Vail employment patterns, the wide variation in businesses makes it difficult to develop a measure based only on local data. The regulations that were adopted in Aspen reflect the variations in employment levels by establishing ranges rather than fixed measures for several of the employment categories. On the other hand, some communities have chosen a single standard that they apply to all categories of business. Based on the data, the Town of Vail may want to consider an approach that uses a range. The results summarized in Figure 1 show that bar/restaurants, real estate, and construction all have relatively large numbers of employees per square footage. In general, the employment numbers from the resorts are somewhat higher than some traditional measures that have been generated in other types of communities. We attribute the higher figures to the ski economy in general, and to the fact that these surveys were conducted during the peak winter months. The retail economies in the ski towns have been strong over the past several years resulting in relatively high employment levels per establishment, especially for those businesses that are centrally located. Iin addition, it should be remembered that we are measuring the total number of employees at a point in time. Many of these individuals may be working multiple jobs (we found an average of about 1.35 jobs per person) so there is some double counting that is taking place when the entire set of businesses is considered. We suggest that the tables that are adopted in Vail should reduce employment levels to address multiple job holding in the formula itself. This calculation has been done in the table that was provided to the Town under separate cover. ROSAI.L RF1vQrIEN CARES PAGE 2 ' EMPIAYMENT GENERATION RATES FIGURE 1 EMPLOYEES PER GROSS 1,000 SQUARE SET 10 9 8 E 7 ' s 6 E 5 ~ ~ W 0 4 3 2 t ~ a € ~ € ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ s ~ S 's 5 ~ s ~ ~ ~ o d c W E oc FIGURE 2 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE PER EMPLOYEE 500 450 400 350 ~ 300 d 250 ~ 200 I . 150 100 ` 50 0 ~ ~ ~ J d W d' ROSALL RFA~QviEN CARES PAGE 3 ' EMPLOYMENT GENERATION RATES In addition to compiling figures on square footages, RRC tabulated data describing the employment pattern within the County and the Town of Vail. These results aze based on data provided by the State describing all businesses in the County that maintain unemployment insurance. These results show that within the County, the retail sector represents about 33 percent of all businesses, and about 27 percent of all jobs. In the Town of Vail the retail sector represents about 40 percent of businesses and about 30 percent of jobs. These results aze useful and important in that they indicate in which sectors most of the development activity will occur. FYGURE 3 TOWN OF VAIL/EAGLE COUNTY Et~toYME[vT BY SIC CO~AREn 40% 35% 30% N Owe ~w /w 25% w...r c:.~wn ~..u 20% I j 15% I ~ I I 10% ,.I ~ 5% 1 076 i ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 CwntY 1L N /iwitiaa ®Twn N Vr % N 1u ' ~ Cw~a~ !C N Jeb~ ®T~wn N Vd X N JeM The measurements for lodging should probably be based on rooms rather than squaze footages. Again; the data indicate wide variations with several facilities having about one employee per 10 rooms, while others aze at more than one employee per room. Vail properties aze especially likely to have higher employment ratios. As shown in the attachments, the Breckenridge research showed .8 employees per room. Overall, the RRC database showed 1.09 employees per room. However, if just the permanent full-time employees aze considered, the ratio drops sharply to .26 employees per room, or close to the one employee per three rooms figure that has been used by some professionals in past estimates. ROSALL RFl~II~fEN CARES PAGE 4 TABLE II COUNTY CALCULATIONS OF EMPLOYEE GENERATION UNITS Land Use Category Employees Generated Residential See Occupanry Standards Tourist Accommodation/ 02 to 0.4 employees per room Lodge Corn m erdai Professional/Office ~.9 empioyees/t000 a.f. = LS~s~ Retail/Wholesale/Services 9.5 employees!/000 s.f. = ZB~: ~ . Warehouse 0.4 employees/1000 s.f. ~ 2$o zP Manufacture 1.5 to 4.0 employees/1000 s.i. Restaurant/Bar 5.0 to 10.0 employees/1000 s.f. Utllities/Ouasl Governmental 1.5 to 2.5 employees/1000 s.f. Other Based on review of APCHA Ci.ARIFiCAT10NS FOR CRY/COUt~T'Y GENERATION: a. The above Employee Generation calculation figures are Intended to be consistent with Section 8-109, Affordable Nouaing, of the qty Code and Section 5-510 of the County Code. b. Employee generation for commerdal uses shall be based on net leasable square footage (see Definitions) and shat! be verified by review of the APgiA. a Affordable housing may be provided on the same site or on an alternate site from the proposed development, provided that txedit shall only be given for dwelling units located within the qty of Aspen or the Aspen Metro Area, as this area Is currently defined .by the Aspen/Pitkln County Growth Management Policy Plan. Applicants proposing to provide affordable housing on an alternative site shall be required to demonstrate Its feasibility through demonstrating that they have an Interest in the property a dwelling units. and by spedfying the stze and type of units to be provided rand any physical upgrades to be accomplished. d. The Aspen qty Code Growth Management Section 6-106G(4)(d) refers to the Provialon of Affordable Housing. Thla section allows for the advice of the qty Coundl's housing designee to be used in the determination of the number of employees the propo d development Is expelled to generate. The standards for employee generation represent the varlou~levels of service which reflect the types of lodge operations In existence or proposed for the qty of Aspen, This section allows that the applicant be given the opportunity ' ~ THt HOUSING/EMPLOYMENT FIGURES FROM SNOWPIASS VILLAGE t' Job generation rates end therefore; the number of employees generated as a result of development varies by the type of land uses which comprise the development. In order to adequately determine the number of jobs which will result from a project, the follow+ng job generation rates shall be applied to each type of use i.n the development that c=astes a Winter tithe impact on the community. TvDP. of Use Nt2tnbPr of Jobs Generated Cotamercial 5.57 Jobs per 1,000 interior • square feet Office 3.78 Jobs per 1,000 interior . square feet Multiple Fataily 0.50 Jobs per Un_t Single Family 0.30 Jobs per Lot Hotel/Lodge Room 0.4a Jobs per Room Ski Area Restaurants 4.53 Jobs per 1,000interior square feet Ski Area 82.6 Jobs per 1;000 skiers at one time Miscellaneous Conference Center 0.97 Jobs per 1,000 interior square feet Health Club 1.47 Jobs per 1,000 interior square feet Others To be determined through sub- division or Planned Unit Deveioptaent Process. B. The number of jobs generated by all types of uses, as determined in Section A, shall be divided by 1.3, the average number of jobs per etaployee, which will determine the number of new employees which will be generated by the development. C. The Town Council has det~.~wined that it is desirable to house 604 of these new employees fn Snowmass Village. • 6 work Sheet Employees Req~:red for Various L'se Types Restaurants, 6 examples 22.858 sq. ft. 126 employees 1 employez per 181.41 sq. ft. Retail General (2 ex.) 1.310 sq. ft. io employees ~ 1 employee per 131 sq. ft. Ski Shops (6 ex.) 26.982 sq. ft. 79 employees employee per 36_.54 sq. ft. Total Retail 8 examples 28.292 sq. ft. 89 employees 1 employee per 317.x8 sq. f t. Offices 6 examples x.3.928 sq. ft. 77 employees = 1 employee per 180 sq. ft. 5 ex. (bank) of 9.605 sq. ft. ~oo`~'~,, 44 employees = 1 employee per 21fi sq. ft. `4"~ ~'otai Retail end offices 14 examples 42.22Q sq. ft. 266 employees ~ 1 employee per 254 sq. ft. Total Commexei,al (restaurantjretail/office) 65.078 Sq. ft. 292 employees 1 employee per 222 sq. ft. Roteis 3 examples 733 rooms 592 employees .8 employees per room ti t MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: August 27, 1991 SUBJECT: A request to create a new Chapter 18.57 of the Municipal Code -Employee Housing, to provide four types of employee housing units and to set specific development/zoning standards for employee housing units. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Mike Mollica/Jill Kammerer I. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY In January, 1990, the Town of Vail, assisted by the consulting firm of Rosall, Remmen, Cares (RRC), of Boulder, Colorado, began the task of developing an affordable housing study for the Town. A goal of the study was to provide a series of policies and recommendations addressing the community's need for expanding the supply of affordable housing for both year-round and seasonal, local residents. The Town Council immediately established a Housing Task Force. Council appointments to the Task Force included representation from the Council, the Planning & Environmental Commission (PEC) and members of the community at large. Following months of study, work sessions and public hearings with the Council and the PEC, the Town of Vail Affordable Housing Study was unanimously approved (by a vote of 6-0) by the Town Council on November 20, 1990. On August 12, 1991, the Planning and Environmental Commission, by a vote of 6-0, unanimously recommended approval of the staff's proposed changes to the zoning code to allow for the provision of employee housing units (EHUs) within certain zone districts. The proposed Ordinance would provide for the following: 1. The creation of a new Chapter 18.57, entitled Employee Housing. 2. The addition of two new definitions, which shall be included in the definition Chapter of the Municipal Code (18.04), entitled "Employee Housing Unit" and "Bathroom." 3. The provision of four types of employee housing units and setting forth the details with regard thereto. The employee housing unit types shall be designated as Type I, Type II, Type III and Type IV. 1 II. DISCUSSION 1. Currently, the application fee for a conditional use permit is $200. As proposed in the attached ordinance, the Type II, Type III and Type IV employee housing units would all require a conditional use permit. The issue here is whether the Town should waive the conditional use permit application fee for the three types of employee housing units listed above. Staff believes that the fee should be waived. 2. The 250 Ordinance, as set forth in Chapter 18.71 of the Municipal Code, currently provides for an additional 250 sq. ft. of GRFA to dwellings which meet certain standards. One of those standards is that at least 5 years must have passed from the date the dwelling unit was issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, or a minimum of 6 years must have passed from the date the original building permit was issued for the construction of the dwelling unit. The issue the staff would like to raise for discussion here is whether the Town should allow the immediate use of the 250 Ordinance to those applicants who would propose to apply the 250 sq. ft. of GRFA to employee housing units, as stipulated in the development standards set for the Types I, II, III and IV employee housing units. Staff supports the use of the 250 Ordinance without the 5 year waiting period. 3. Attached to this memorandum is a letter from Ned Gwathmey, dated July 15, 1991, to Kristan Pritz, the Community Development Department Director for the Town of Vail. Mr. Gwathmey's recommendation is that an additional incentive, besides the proposed density bonus, should be granted for those applicants proposing to add an employee dwelling unit on their property. Mr. Gwathmey recommends that GRFA bonuses be granted to those requesting such employee housing units. The issue for discussion here is whether the Town of Vail should provide GRFA bonuses for applicants proposing to add employee dwelling units on their properties. One idea for providing this incentive would be for the Town to grant a GRFA bonus of up to 100-150 sq. ft., and it would be required that an applicant match this GRFA by utilizing some of the allowable GRFA for the property. 4. The number of residents permitted per unit and restrictions, if any, related to children born to residents during the lease. 5. May units be constructed for sale as well as rental? 6. Is it acceptable to the Council to have Type I EHUs be staff/DRB approved? If so, what criteria should the staff/DRB use, and what is the process to be followed with adjacent property owners. The present ordinance provides that an applicant for a Type I EHU must provide information to the Community Development Department so that adjacent property owners may be notified, but it does not state what happens after that information is received by the CDD. Is 2 a notification provided before the decision, after the decision, is there a right of appeal to the Planning Commission after the decision, etc. 7. Is it necessary to restrict the subdivision and sale of EHUs if their use is already restricted by covenants filed on the land records lasting in perpetuity. Why not provide for the sale of these units to employees who meet the criteria, or the sale of these units to anyone else as long as they continue to rent to employees? 8. What constitutes along-term lease? Is 30 days adequate? 9. How often should a property owner be required to file an employee housing report with the Town? Annually? Biannually? 10. Should consideration be given to requiring employee housing developers to provide private transportation services (i.e., shuttle bus, van) for project residents? c:~counal~memosUiousi ng.827 3 ~ ~U~ 1 ~ 199t 111 _ , FI July 15, 1991 Ms. Kristen Pritz, Director of Community Development Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Re: Affordable Housing Units Drafted Ordinance Dear Kristen: The draft ordinance, specifically AHU Type 1 for Affordable Housing in the primary/secondary zoning, lacks any incentive other than allowing a second or third kitchen. I suggest many owners would add a unit which would meet all the conditions and be available for long term rental if square footage in excess of GRFA, 425, etc., were to be given. I suggest an employee unit cannot be much less than 400 square feet and that the allowed 425 per unit not be applicable. I have a number of clients who are absentee owners and would build careta}:er or au pair units but not at the expense of reducing their accommodations. I think we should encourage and give incentives; otherwise, the time/energy/paper is wasted. The end, i.e. employee accommodations, is worthwhile. Please don't hesitate to call if you want additional free advice. Sincerely, ARNOLD/GWATHMEY/PRATT ARCHITECTS, P.C. Edward M. Gwathmey, AIA EMG/ad copy to: Steve Kirby Mike Shannon Walter Forbes , ~ WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP August 23, 1991 Page 1 of 2 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 8/8/89 WEST INTERMOUNTAIN COUNCIL: Proceeding w/legal requirements Council is mulling over next step. ANNEXATION for annexation. (request: Lapin) 07/27 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN LARRY/GREG: Work with Holy Cross Cost estimate on per Tot basis received; EAST VAIL Electric to establish special improvement engineering .and bonding costs to be district(s) for underground utilities in added to this estimate. Calendar and East Vail. assessment options in preparation. 12/18 MILLRACE CONDO. ASSN. KRISTAN: Respond. With foreclosure of property complete, LETTER - - - - - - follow-up on new contacts initiated. Betsy is doing research. Shelly/Gary to meet with Larry. 1/11/91 SNOW STORAGE RON/GREG: Work out site acquisition with Lease being renegotiated. Environmental VA. Complete design. assessment prior to lease being investigated. Discussions with CDOT proceeding for permission to use R.O.W. for berm. 05/07 VA/2o SALES TAX COLLECTIO LARRY/STEVE: Research remedies to change Research is underway. Larry to get any (request: Gibson/Lapin) this to a mandatory TOV tax collection, legal information needed to Steve. To be done when budget work sessions are completed (mid-October). 05/14 IMPROVEMENTS TO MULTI- KRISTAN: What incentives can the TOV 7-9-91 memo from Community Development FAMILY BUILDINGS provide to condominium/townhouse associa- discussed with Council. Further input on (request: Fritzlen/Lapin) tions to initiate/expedite this process? updated California legislation to follow Investigate what California and Hawaii when it is received. have on their books. 1 WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP August 23, 1991 Page 2 of 2 TOPIC QUESTIONS ~ FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 05/19 VIEW CORRIDORS KRISTAN: Research additional corridors Long-term project to be brought to Council to be legislated, within next 6 months. 06/04 EAST VAIL BIKE PATH GREG: What was the final resolution of Council and DRB approved new design. (request: Steinberg) the bike path at the far east end of Negotiations and CDOT review underway. Bighorn? North or south side access? 07/02 SHOSHONE WATER RIGHTS RON: Speak with Warren Garbe to clarify Have talked with Warren Garbe and will set TRADE issues and establish procedure for future date for meeting. (request: Lapin) talks. _ 07/09 SNOW REMOVAL ON PRIVATE LARRY: Research ordinance. Ordinance already on TOV books regarding PROPERTY individual's responsibility to clear sidewalks. Wording to the effect this is a "negligent act" if left undone within a certain timeframe to be added. To be done by 10-91. 07/16 INVESTIGATE SUMMIT LINFIELD: Pursue. Will meet with appropriate officials. COUNTY BIKE PATHS 08106 TOUR OF PUBLIC WORKS BARWICK: Schedule tours prior to To be scheduled. FACILITY start of budget discussions. 08/20 REVISE ORDINANCE ON LARRY: Recommend revisions for To be done by 10-15-91. BIDDING REQUIREMENTS bidding process. (request: Rose) . .