HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-03-03 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL.
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1992
X1:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
1. Update: Art in Public Places Activities.
2. Request to Place a Portion of an Awning and its Structure on the Ore House Deck
which Partially Encroaches on Town of Vail Land, 232 Bridge Street.
Applicant: The Ore House -Larry Anderson.
3. Willow Bridge Update and Options Available for Construction.
4. Review of Horsedrawn Carriage Contracts.
5. Review of West Vail Interchange Traffic Control. .
6. Discussion Re: Parking/Transportation Plan Alternatives for Village Loading.
7. Information Update.
8. Council Reports.
9. Other.
10. Executive Session: Land Negotiations and Legal Matters.
11. Adjournment.
C:IAGENDA. WS
ti
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
' WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1992
1:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
1:00 p.m. 1. Update on Art in Public Places Activities.
Shelly Mello
i :15 p.m. 2. Request by Applicant to place a portion of an awning and its
Shelly Mello structure on the Ore House deck which partially encroaches on
Town of Vail land, 232 Bridge Street. Applicant: The Ore House
- Larry Anderson.
Action Requested of Council: Approveldeny request to place
awning and structure on Town of Vail land.
Backaround Rationale: The Ore House deck partially
encroaches on Town of Vail land. There is a current deck lease
for this area. However, it is necessary for the applicant to
receive permission from the Town of Vail to make any
improvements. The DRB has reviewed the item conceptually,
but has not approved the request.
1:25 p.m. 3. Willow Bridge Update and Options Available for Construction.
Greg Hall
Action Requested of Council: Give staff direction on how to
proceed on the Willow Bridge project.
Backaround Rationale: The bids for the Willow Bridge project
came in overestimates. Staff has met with the contractor and
discussed various cost saving measures.
Staff Recommendation: Proceed with construction with minimal
changes to the design characteristics.
1:55 p.m. 4. Review of Horsedrawn Carriage Contracts.
Ken Hughey
Action Requested of Council: Provide staff with direction.
Backaround Rationale: The contracts between TOV and the
horsedrawn carriage companies have expired. Prior to entering
into new contracts, the staff would like to hear Council's views on
the issue.
Staff Recommendation: Proceed with contract development.
2:25 p.m. 5. Review of West Vail Interchange Traffic Control.
Ken Hughey
Action Requested of Council: Review and select desired traffic
control plan.
Backaround Rationale: Mayor Ostertoss has requested the
Police Department to provide Council with projected costs, etc. to
1
~ ti
implement traffic control at the West Vail Interchange. Police
staff have prepared several scenarios for Council review.
Staff Recommendation: Do not provide manual traffic control at
the West Vail Interchange.
2:55 p.m. 6. Discussion re: Parking/Transportation Plan Alternatives for
Greg Hall Village loading.
Action Requested of Council: Decide on Village loading
recommendation to include in Master Transportation Study.
Backaround Rationale: The Council requested, after the January
15, 1992, public input session, that options on Village loading be
brought back to them so the Council could discuss which
direction is appropriate to include in the Master Transportation
Plan as recommendations. The Master Transportation Plan
adoption by the Council is dependent upon the Council being
able to support the plan's recommendations on Village loading.
Staff Recommendation: Make a decision on recommendations
the Council can support when the plan is presented for formal
adoption.
3:25 p.m. 7. Information Update.
8. Council Reports.
9. Other.
10. Executive Session: Land Negotiations and Legal Matters.
11. Adjournment.
C:VIGENDA. WSE
2
I
TOWN OF VAIL and DAN DAILEY
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this , 1992
between the TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation (the "Town")
and DAN DAILEY ("Artist").
WHEREAS, the Town wishes to hire the Artist, as an independent
contractor, to render certain services set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Town engages the Artist as an independent contractor to
render, arrange, coordinate, and pay for all of the services necessary
and desirable for the following:
a) the design of an eight foot by ten foot glass mural for the
Vail Transportation Center including the design of seven 1' x 1' glass
blocks;
b) the design and construction of a model of a street lamp for
the Vail Transportation Center; and
c) the construction and installation of the 8' x 10' glass
mural including the seven individual glass blocks, collectively.
The artists' services set forth in Paragraph a, b and c above
shall hereafter be called the "Project". Should the Town wish to
expand the Project, it shall give notice to the Artist of such expansion,
and the Town and the Artist shall mutually agree to a fee and a
completion date for the expanded Project.
2. Nature of Services
The Artist will perform the following services during the
period commencing with the signing of this letter, and with a completion
date no later than
A. Create the design and submit drawings and plans of the
project for approval by the Town.
B. Upon acceptance of the design proposal, design and
purchase the materials necessary to produce the project as indicated on
the drawings approved the Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board ("the
Board") .
C. Arrange periodically, and upon the Town's request for
review and inspection of:
1
1
(i) Sample of materials to be used in the fabrication •r
of the project, which samples shall be subject to the approval of the
Board.
(ii) Proposed installation/mounting methods.
(iii) The work in progress relating to the fabrication of
the project.
D. Arrange the fabrication plan of the project including
the specifications set forth in Section 2(a) above. The Artist shall be
responsible for the actual installation of the Project, including all
attendant costs. The Town shall attempt to provide the Artist with
employees to perform labor, installation and electrical help to reduce
the installation cost.
E. Notify the Town of Vail Art in Public Places Board in
writing ten (10) business days in advance if the projected date for
completion of fabrication can not be met.
F. Arrange for delivery of the Project to the site of the
Town on or such other date as
mutually agreed upon by the Town and the Artist. The delivery of the
Project or any of its components shall occur no later than
The Artist shall not be responsible
for any delay in delivery due to accident, labor dispute, embargo,
failure or delay of transportation, adverse weather conditions, acts of
God, acts of civil or military Authority, flood, war, riot, or civil
disturbance, or any other cause beyond the Artist's control. In the
event of the occurrence of any of the events listed in this paragraph,
the Agreement time shall be extended for a reasonable period of time
based on the nature of the event causing the delay.
G. Inspect the work periodically during construction and at
completion of installation. The Artist will be responsible for the
installation of the Project and all matters relating thereto.
3. Compensation
~As consideration for the Performance of the Artist's service,
in accordance with this Agreement, the Town shall pay the sum of
$60,000.00 as follows:
a) $5,000.00 to commence design development.
b) $5,000.00 for the completion of definitive drawings for
the Project.
c) $10,000.00 to commence fabrication of the Project.
2
r
'r d) $20,000.00 upon completion of prototype and approval of
same. Not to be paid before July 15, 1992.
e) $20,000.00 upon substantial completion of the Project to
be paid upon final installation in place at the Vail Transportation~~
Center.
4. The parties may terminate this Agreement upon the following
conditions:
a) Either party shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement in the event the other party is in default of any of the terms
of this Agreement and such default remains unremedied for a period of
sixty (60) days following receipt of written notice of the default by the
defaulting party; provided however that nothing in this Agreement shall
prevent either party from bringing any lawsuit based upon the other
party's breach of contract for non-payment.
b) The Town shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement should funding for the completion of this Project not be
obtained by the Town in the amount of $60,000.00 no later than June 1,
1992. Should this Project be terminated by the Town for failure to
obtain the necessary funding, the Artist shall be entitled to retain all
funds paid prior to the date of such termination, and the Town shall
compensate the Artist for the cost of any subcontracts relating to the
construction of the Project which the Artist is obligated to pay at the
time of termination.
c) The exercise of any right of termination as set forth in
this paragraph shall be in writing, and shall set forth the grounds for
termination. Copyright and the Project created pursuant to this
Agreement shall remain the property of the Artist. The Artist, however,
grants a perpetual, irrevocable, and non-exclusive license for public
display including photographing and/or video-taping the final product.
The Artist agrees not to substantially reproduce the Project described
in this Agreement for any client other than the Town.
5. Warranty
A. The Artist warrants that all materials and work will
conform to the drawings, samples, or other descriptions given in all
respects, and that all materials delivered in accordance with this
Agreement shall be of good quality and workmanship, and free from all
defects, and the Project shall conform to the characteristics and
specifications set forth in the drawings for a period of one year. In
3
i~
. ~
the event defects are discovered during the warranty period, the Artist 1'
shall promptly remedy such defects at no additional expense to the Town.
The Artist warrants that the Project to be designed and constructed by
the Artist will be an original design by the Artist and will not infringe
upon or violate any patent, copyrights, trade secret, trademark, or any
other rights of any third party. The Artist agrees to indemnify the
Town, its agents, officers, employees, licensees, and assigns from all
claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and legal fees arising from
any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, and/or proceedings which may
be made or brought against the Town in relation to:
(i) Any breach of the warranty set forth in Paragraph
5 of this Agreement.
(ii) Any injury or alleged injury to, or death of any
person or persons, or any damage to property, or otherwise arising out
of or in connection with the Artist's negligence or willful misconduct
in the installation and maintenance of the Project.
B. The Town agrees to indemnify the Artist, its agents,
officers, directors, employees, licensees, and assigns from all claims,
losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and legal fees arising from any
injury or alleged injury to, or death of, any person or persons, or any
damage to property or otherwise arising out of or in connection with the
Town's negligence in the performance of duties pursuant to this
Agreement.
6. Insurance
A. The Artist agrees to procure and maintain, at his own
cost, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to insure against all
liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the
contractor pursuant Section 5 of this Agreement.
B. The Artist shall procure and maintain, and shall cause
any subcontractor of the Artist to procure and maintain, the minimum
insurance coverages listed below. Such coverages shall be procured and
maintained with forms and insurers acceptable to the Town. All coverages
shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability, claims, demands,
and other obligations assumed by the Artist pursuant to Paragraph 15 of
this Agreement. The Artist will not be required to obtain Colorado
Workman's Compensation or Employer's Liability Insurance until
immediately prior to the commencement of the installation of the Project.
4
t
C. Workman's Compensation Insurance to cover obligations
imposed by the applicable laws for any employee engaged in the
performance under this Agreement, and Employer's Liability Insurance with
minimum limits of $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease/policy limit,
and $500,000 disease/each employee.
D. General Liability Insurance with minimum combined single
limits of $1,000,000 each occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate. The
policy should be applicable to all premises and operations. The policy
shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage
(including completed operations), personal injury (including coverage for
contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual, independent
contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall
include coverage for explosion, collapse, and underground hazards. The
policy shall contain a severability of interest provision.
E. Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance with
minimum combined single limits for bodily injury and property damage of
not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate with
respect to each of the Artist's own, hired, or non-owned vehicles
assigned to or used in performance of the Project. The policy shall
contain a severability of interest provision.
F. The policies required by Paragraphs D and E of this
Section shall be endorsed to include the Town, its officers, and
employees as additional insureds. Every policy required above shall be
primary insurance, and any insurance carried by the Town, its officers,
or its employees or carried by a provider through any insurance pool,
shall be in excess and not contributary insurance to be provided by the
Artist. No additional insured endorsement to the policy required by
Paragraph C above shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or
property damage arising from completed operations. The Artist shall be
solely responsible for any deductible losses under any policy required
above.
G. The Certificate Insurance provided to the Town shall be
completed by the Artist's insurance agent as evidence that policies
providing required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits are in full
force and effect, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Attorney for
the Town prior to commencement of the project. The Certificate .shall
identify this Agreement and shall provide that the coverages afforded
under the policies shall not be canceled, terminated, or materially
5
changed until at least thirty (30) days written notice has been given the
Town.
7. Use of Name
Each party gives to the other permission to use the other
party's name, picture, portrait, photographs, if any, in all forms of
media and in all manner, including but not limited to exhibition,
display, advertising, trade, editorial uses, subject to the provisions
of this Agreement regarding copyright and trademarks, with no violation
of either party's right of privacy or other personal or proprietary right
they may possess in connection with the Project or any incidental works
made in connection with the Project.
8. Trade Secrets
Both parties agree that all such materials and any and all
matters concerning the Town and its affiliates or the Artist's services
learned by either party during the course of the Artist's services
hereunder are trade secrets and are not to be disclosed, disseminate, or
otherwise revealed in any manner whatsoever to anyone.
9. Access to Site
The Town will provide access to the site to the Artist, its
employees and agents for the purposes of the installation of the Project .
10. Maintenance
The Town agrees to follow reasonable instructions given to it
by the Artist concerning the care and maintenance of the Project. The
Town will make a good faith effort to permit the Artist to make any
repairs on the property for a period of ten (10) years after the
installation thereof. However, if the Artist's estimate for such repairs
is unreasonable or if it is not possible for the Artist to the repairs
in an expedient manner, the Town shall have the right to have the repairs
performed by another party of its own choosing.
11. Delay of Installation
In the event the site is not ready for installation at the
anticipated time of delivery of the Project, the Town shall given the
Artist seven (7) days prior written notice that such delay is
anticipated.
12. Artistic Credit
The Town agrees to use the Artist's name if the Town issues
press releases or prepares articles relating to the Project.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Town is not obligated to use the
6
I
I
r
Artist's name in any advertising, publicity, or other promotional
arrangements.
13. waiver of Claims
The making of final payment to the Artist will operate as a
waiver of all claims against the Artist except those claims arising from:
a) Unsettled liens, if any;
b) Faulty or defective work appearing after completion and
acceptance of the Project;
c) Failure of the Artist to comply with the requirements of
this Agreement.
The acceptance of final payment by the Artist will constitute
waiver of all claims against the Town except those previously made in
writing and accepted by the Artist as unsettled at the time invoicing for
final payment.
14. Artist Incapacity
In the event of the incapacitating illness or injury resulting
in the Artist's disability, the Town shall have the option of terminating
the work as set forth in Paragraph 4(b), or suspending any payment to the
Artist during the period of disability. Should the Town exercise its
option to suspend payments until the incapacitating disability ceases,
the Artist shall notify the Town of the cessation of such disability, and
the Town's obligations to make payments as set forth in this Agreement
shall resume. Upon the death of the Artist or upon the disability of the
Artist which lasts longer than sixty (60) days, the Town shall have the
option to terminate this Agreement or to require the Artist's
representatives to retain all necessary personnel to complete the work.
15. Damage
The Town agrees that in the event of any damage done to the
Project, the Town shall make all reasonable efforts to consult with the
Artist prior to the commencement of any repairs or restoration, and
should the Town determine to hire the Artist to make any required repairs
or restoration, the Town shall pay the Artist for his services at a rate
equal to the Artist's then prevailing hourly rate for comparable work and
for any necessary travel expenses.
16. Copyright Notice
The parties agree that there will be affixed by the Artist to
the Project a copyright notice which shall include the copyright symbol
date and the Artist's name prior to the completion of the work, and the
7
copyright notice shall be attached, if possible, to some part of the
Project, or adjacent to the Project, all in a manner so that notice shall
be visible in a manner and location as to give reasonable notice of the
Artist's copyright on the Project. Any authorized reproduction of the
Project by either party, for whatever purpose, shall include the
copyright notice so that the Artist's rights to the copyright will be
protected.
17. Assignment
The Artist shall not have the right to assign his obligations
hereunder without the prior written consent of the Town whose consent may
be absolutely withheld for any reason whatsoever. The duties of the
Artist set forth in this Agreement are personal to the Artist and are to
be performed exclusively by the Artist as specified herein.
18. No Ac7encv
The Artist shall not have the right to act as an agent for the
Town or to bond the Town to any contractual obligations. Any attempt on
the part of the Artist will be deemed a breach of this Agreement.
19. The Project may be relocated or deaccessioned pursuant to the
Town's Art in Public Places guidelines, Paragraphs D and E, respectively.
20. Miscellaneous Provisions
A. No alterations, modifications, amendments, additions,
deletions, or changes to this Agreement shall be effective or binding on
the party to be charged unless and until such alterations, modifications,
amendments, additions, deletions, or changes are property executed in
writing.
B. This Agreement shall be binding upon an inure to the
benefit of, the parties and the respective heirs, and legal
representatives with the restrictions set forth in Paragraph 16 hereof.
C. All headings used in this Agreement are for reference
purposes only, and are not intended or deemed to limit or affect, in any
way, the meaning or interpretation of any of the terms or provisions of
this Agreement.
D. All provisions of this Agreement are severable and the
invalidation of one provision shall not operate to invalidate the entire
Agreement.
E. All notices required by this Agreement shall be made in
writing, postage-paid, certified mail/return receipt requested.
8
t~
i
F. In the event that action is initiated to enforce any or
all of the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled such attorney's fees, costs, and disbursements as are deemed
reasonable and proper by the Court.
G. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Colorado.
H. In any action relating to the enforcement of this
Agreement, jurisdiction and venue shall be proper only in the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the
date first set forth above.
TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado DAN DAILEY,
municipal corporation
By: By:
Rondall V. Phillips, Dan Dailey, Artist
Town Manager
ATTEST:
By:
Pamela A. Brandmeyer,
Town Clerk
9
t . .
any
TOWN OF VAIL ~
7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Public Works/Transportation
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2166
MEMORANDiJM
T0: Ron Phillips
FROM: Ken Hughey
Greg Hall
DATE: February 28, 1992
RE: Willow Bridge Options
On February 11, 1992 the Public Works Department opened bids for
the Willow Bridge Replacement project. The apparent low bidder
was G.A. Western Construction Company at $442,259.00. The Town
received five bids, the range of the four most responsive bids is
$442,259.00 - $459,054.00. This is a difference of 3.8% between
the high and low bid. It is apparent the Town received very
competitive bids on the bridge project considering the Town did
not receive any bids the two previous times the bridge was bid.
In evaluating ~the~ range,_ and_ the closeness of the individual work
items of the bids, they are competitive.
The original overall budget for this project was estimated at
$370,000.00 in August of 1990. The breakdown is as follows:
Engineering Design $ 50,000.00
Construction Budget $300,000.00
Contingency S 20.000.00
TOTAL $370,000.00
This budget was based on costs for the West Gore Creek Drive
Bridge Replacement which had a total cost of $219,371.51 in the
fall of 1990. The breakdown of that bridge is as follows:
Engineering Design $ 19,978.02
Construction Budget 5199.393.49
TOTAL $219,371.51
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 2
The overall budget presented to Town staff the first of July 1990
following preliminary design was $413,633.00. The breakdown is
as follows:
Engineering Design $ 68,133.00
Engineer Cost Estimate $314,000.00
Contingency S 31.500.00
TOTAL $413,633.00
At this time, the Town staff made a conscientious decision to
save $150,000.00 from the 1991 capital budget to be used in the
1992 budget to handle the Willow Bridge and other capital
project's projected overruns.
The budget presented to Town staff in October 1992, following
final design and knowing the bridge needed to be rebid, having
been presented a claim by the engineer for extra work, a decision
to charge Public Works salaries to the project and adding a
public relations budget was $470,350.00. The breakdown is as
follows:
Engineering Design and Miscellaneous $ 69,500.00
Engineer Estimate (prior to bidding in July) $325,000.00
Contingency 15g~(based on rebids) $ 50,000.00
Public Works Salaries $ 9,100.00
Additional Professional Fees $ 15,000.00
Public Relations S 2,000.00
TOTAL $470,350.00
After opening the bids in February 1992 the budget was
$574,925.00. The breakdown is as follows:
Engineering Design, settled disputes and
rebid costs $ 76,275.00
Contractors Bid $442,500.00
Contingency 10$ $ 44,250.00
Professional Fees (initial construction survey) $ 1,000.00
Public Works Salaries $ 8,900.00
Public Relations S 2,000.00
TOTAL $574,925.00
One item to note, the engineer estimate in October was not based
on the same quantity's bid in February. Through the bidding
process last August and final design changes certain quantity
clarifications were made. The engineers estimate of February was
$360,500.00.
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 3
An evaluation of how the budget amount ballooned to its' current
level is as follows:
Additional engineering cost due to bidding $ 8,247.00
the project 3 times and a very lengthy and
detailed design and approval process.
Public Works salaries which had not been $ 8,900.00
anticipated to be included in the project budget.
Public relations budget. S 2.000.00
TOTAL $19,047.00
The engineer, contractor and staff have found some savings in the
bridge construction without affecting any aesthetic or structural
characteristics. These include:
By the use of rock caps versus a precast cap $ 7,472.00
to simulate the rock.
Elimination of the abutment bearing pads. $ 3,200.00
Using masonry block versus concrete for the S 6.138.00_
planter walls.
TOTAL $16,810.00
The evaluation of the Willow Bridge Costs versus other bridge
costs needed to evaluate the aesthetic considerations. Since the
low bid contractor also was the Town's contractor on the Gore
Creek Drive Bridge, these comparisons can be accomplished fairly
easily.
Aesthetic Items
Landscaping and Irrigation $ 13,085.00
Flags, Lighting and Plaques $ 21,070.00
Rock wall Caps and Column Caps $ 12,117.00
Rock Work $ 36,000.00
Spandrel Arch of the Bridge $ 22,000.00
Battered Wing Walls and Abutments $ 10,315.00
Concrete Unit Pavers $ 10,000.00
Planter Walls S 21.942.00
TOTAL AESTHETIC COSTS $148;959.00 ,
5
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 4
It is felt the engineer's estimate verses the revised
contractor's bid took into account the aesthetic features.
$425,449.00 versus $360,500.00 = $64,949.00 difference
The area where it appears no consideration was given by the
engineer and Town staff was the tightness of the site. We all
had a concern about the tightness of the schedule and how that.
may affect the costs, but no consideration was given to the
tightness of the site. The time frame was the same concern
everyone had on the Vail Transportation construction project.
The contractors for both projects stated the schedule is not as
constraining as the working conditions.
In reviewing their Gore Creek Drive Bridge costs to the willow
Bridge Costs, the constraint factor is very visible. The
breakdown is as follows:
Bridge Demolition $ 9,000.00
Earthwork $ 8,000.00
. Rock Rip Rap Placement $ 9,000.00
Bridge Work Itself $20,000.00
Pre Cast Work $10,000.00
Mobilization $20.000.00
TOTAL $76,000.00
The summary of the bridge results are a~s follows:
Contractors Revised Costs $425,449.00
Aesthetic Concerns ($148,959.00)
Tightness of the Site (S 76.OOO.OOI
TOTAL $200,490.00
(Basic bridge in Vail outside core area with good site
access and working room)
Construction Cost of West Gore Creek Drive Bridge 5199.393.49
The design concept of the bridge was the same design concept for
any Village core project. This is to try to achieve an old world
flavor and character. Design elements of the bridge to achieve
this include the rock facing, the battered (sloped) abutments and
wingwalls and the arched opening.
The second design concept is the enhancement to the pedestrian
experience and to allow the pedestrians to interact with the
area. Through the design process it became apparent, we were no
longer designing a bridge, but a pedestrian plaza. A place where
people would want to congregate. This change in focus was the
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 5
point where the staff, designers and Town boards realized this
project needed to convey to our guests that this was a place of
excitement and celebration, The design elements of the project
to achieve the affects of a pedestrian plaza include; the
pedestrian overlooks, the lights and flags .on the bridge, the
lighting of the bridge from below, the pedestrian alcove to allow
benches to be placed, allowing room for a path adjacent to the
creek underneath the bridge, the bridge rail and rock caps.
The third design concept was this project would be a
demonstration project for the anticipated streetscape plan. The
design elements of the project to achieve these results were the
concrete unit paver bridge deck, landscaping of the project and
the planters on all sides of the bridge.
The above trys to explain the "whys" of the project costs. The
next stop is to evaluate how to get the project constructed and
paid for. There is certain work the Town of Vail can perform
versus the contractor.
Without impacting other Town projects and necessary maintenance
work, Town crews can complete a portion of the work with a
projected savings to the Town of around $5,000.00
Another option is since certain features of the project can be
tied to a streetscape type project, these features could be paid
for with RETT funds. This amount equals $35,027.00 for the
landscaping and planter walls.
The last issue is the $280,00.00 secured by the state. The
bridge must once constructed pass a rating of 80 on the bridge
rating scale. Criteria used to determine the rating includes
such things as; structural stability, bridge width, roadway
approaches and bridge rails. Any changes proposed to the design
must be evaluated to determine if the rating is still intact.
If the Town decides not to construct the bridge the Town will
loose the $280,000.00 from the state. If in the future, the Town
wanted to reconstruct Willow Bridge, a plain bridge in this
location would cost $280,000.00 in todays dollars based on very
competitive bids.
The staff's recommendation is to build the bridge as modified by
the Contractor and engineer, evaluate any additional savings
which may be provided by Town crews most likely in a range of
$5,000.00. Realize that the state has paid for the bridge and
the Town has funded the engineering, staff salaries and aesthetic
treatments.
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 6
If the Town decides not to construct the bridge the Town will
loose the $280,000.00 from the state. If in the future, the Town
wanted to reconstruct Willow Bridge, a plain bridge in this
location would cost $280,000.00 in todays dollars based on very
competitive bids.
The staff's recommendation is to build the bridge as modified by
the Contractor and engineer, evaluate any additional savings
which may be provided by Town crews most likely in a range of~
$5,000.00. Realize that the state has paid for the bridge and
the Town has funded the engineering, staff salaries and aesthetic
treatments.
Budget the full 10~ contingency costs, but hope for some .return.
The Town has had a good track record with the contractor on
claims, however, there are those unanticipated costs due to
unforeseen circumstances and we know we have to relocate the
utilities on the bridge during construction. The utility
relocation fees are included in the contingency.
GH/dsr
GHRPWBCS
i
Memorandum Regarding Willow Bridge Options
February 28, 1992
Page 6
Budget the full loo contingency costs, but hope for some return.
The Town has had a good track record with the contractor on
claims, however, there are those unanticipated costs due to
unforeseen circumstances and we know we have to relocate the
utilities on the bridge during construction. The utility
relocation fees are included in the contingency.
GH/dsr
GHRPWBCS
. ~{~liru. S
Y - a,3, y~
M E M O RAN D U M
TO: Ron Phillips, Town Manager
FROM: Ken Hughey, Police Ch' Interim Public Work Director
DATE: February 28, 1992
SUBJECT: Traffic Control at West Vail Interchange
Town Council has requested an analysis of various options as it
relates to traffic control at the West Vail Interchange. The
Police Department staff has reviewed available options and feels
the most viable are as follows:
Option A: Increase Full time Seasonal Staff by seven (7) CSO's -
$2935 per week _
- Pros: Would allow the TOV to provide seven day a week "as
needed" response to the West Vail interchange for
traffic control
Cons: - Cost to provide service
- What to do with the new CSO's when not di-recting
traffic
- Lack of available radios for coordination
- Lack of available radio frequency
Option B: Provide "reduced" traffic control coverage with existing
CSO staff seven days a week - $1344 per week
Pros: -Would give four (4) hours of traffic control seven (7)
days a week
- No additional staff
Cons: -Availability of off-duty CSO's to fill-in needed hours
- Burnout factor
- Lack of available radios
- Lack of available radio frequency
- Difficulty in anticipating actual time periods needed
to do scheduling .
- Resources not available during non-scheduled hours
Note: Police officers or other TOV personnel could be used,
but costs would increase
Option C: Provide minimal traffic control on selected days: $48/hr
Pros: Would provide some relief on selected days of remaining
ski season
Cons: - Scheduling is non-scientifically based
- Availability of off-duty CSO's
- Burnout factor
- Lack of available radios
- Lack of available radio frequencies
- Resources not available during nonscheduled hours. A
negative feeling could develop in the community if we
had traffic control on certain busy days and not on
others.
Option D: Not provide traffic control.
Rather than "taking on" this .situation and run the risk
of making it worse, we would not apply a bandaid, but rather work
with CDOT toward a long term solution of .interchange modifications
andf or traffic signals .
Other Issues
- Roadway is property of CDOT and not TOV
- Roadway is not in TOV limits - annexation is in
process
- Liability/insurance issues _
Recommendation
The Police Department staff recommends that we not
provide traffic control at the West Vail interchange for the
remainder of the ski season. We should, however, continue to
evaluate the situation and work toward long term solutions.
J .
March 2, 1992
dd,
These need to go in all the packets
except for the Town Council members. (They
have already received a copy of this
letter in their packets.)
Desiree
_
IO~IN o~
75 south frontage road
vail, Colorado 81657
(303) 479-2116
~ ..o ' .
1
M"
.4
TOU~V OF VAIL ~
7S South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2105/FAX 303-479-21 S7
February 24, 1992
Mr. R. P. Moston
Colorado Department of Transportation
222 South Sixth Street
P.O. Box 2107
Grand Junction, CO 81502-2107
Dear Bob:
I am v~~-iting in response to your letter of January 6, 1992 regarding traffic
control at the Vail Road/South Frontage Road Intersection. The Town of Vail
shares your utmost concern for the safety of drivers, their vehicles, pedestrians,
and others at this major intersection, as on all public roadways within our
community.
As you know, we have worked hard to balance the need for safety and
traffic control at this intersection with the community's resistance to installing
electric traffic control devices. Pursuant to the suggestion by Rich Penske and
yourself, the To«m of Vail initiated the current aggressive manual traffic control
system folio«~ing the Town Council's v~~ithdrawal from the new interchange /
signalization project in 1987. We are pleased to hear from our consulting
engineers, Selsburg, Holt & Ulle~~ig, that when traffic volumes are very high, the
manual system often enhances traffic flow more effectively than an automated
approach.
I am disappointed to hear of the negative report you received regarding our
current system of traffic control at this interchange. This report seems to be
quite inaccurate and ill-informed. We respectfully request that you consider the
care v~~e have invested in the current traffic control program before f~~ ~,~ing your
judgement of its effectiveness.
Given the. Town's concern for safety in this area, we limit the personnel
assigned to tlvs duty only to those who are highly trained and experienced in
traffic control. Contrary to the report you received, we do not, and never have,
utilized volunteers or individuals who are inexperienced in traffic direction for
this purpose. .
MR. R. P. MOSTON LETTER
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
PAGE 2
In order to insure seven day a week coverage, the Town employs nine (9)
full time winter seasonal employees to supplement'a staff of three (3) full time
year-round employees. The primary role of these twelve (12) employees is traffic .
control at the impacted intersections, including the main Vail 1-70 interchange,
the intersection of Vail Road /South Frontage Road, and the intersection of Vail
Road/Meadow Drive. All personnel are provided with a minimum of forty (40)
hours of instruction to enhance their safe and consistent traffic direction
abilities. This training, comli~ined with daily field experience, renders these
individuals more qualified to provide this service than the average uniformed/
sworn police officer. Please consider, as well, 33% of the current staff are
returnees from one or more prior years in the same position.
We began the manual traffic control program in the winter of 1988-1989
to pro«de for efficient traffic flow at the intersections cited above. The number
of personnel stationed in these areas at any given time ranges from one to five,
depending upon the traffic volume. These traffic directors are trained in .
operating as a team and coordinate their efforts via portable radios, utilizing a
frequency which is dedicated to their activities.
I am hopeful you will consider these points raised regarding our traffic
direction program. The Town of Vail holds serious concern for traffic safety in
our community and we believe we are actually taking steps beyond those deemed
mandatory to provide safe, efficient, and effective traffic flow at the noted
locations.
It may be that you did not previously receive the appropriate information
on ~;-hich to base your request that our traffic direction activities cease, and we
are hopeful you will reconsider. With a more adequate picture of the situation,
we hope you will provide the To«Tn any necessary permission to continue our
successful and safe program of manual traffic control.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of the issues raised. I await
your reply and, as always, appreciate the Department's spirit of cooperation in
pro«ding our citizens and guest with the highest levels of quality service.
Sinc ly,
Rondall V. Phillips
Town Manager
cc: Vail Totem Council
Ken Hughey
Corey Schmidt
~ ~ ~ .
~ 3.3 •y I-' -
y '
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ron Ph• ip
FROM: Ken Hu y
DATE: February 28, 1992
SUBJECT: Horse Drawn Carriages
The contracts between the Town of Vail and the horse drawn carriage
companies have expired. Prior to renegotiating the contracts, it
was felt appropriate to get Council input on the issue.
It needs to be decided .up front, however, .whether or not the
Council feels it is in the overall best interests of the community '
for the carriages. to be allowed to continue to operate. There have
been several incidents which has caused some visitors and residents
to question the value and safety of the service. -
Should we decide to allow this type of service to continue, we
would encourage support of strong measures designed to ensure safe
operation of the service. This would require additional resources
to provide for the retention of qualified personnel to monitor and
test for driver training, equipment. compliance, monitor the health
and training standards of the horses, effectiveness. of diapers,
etc. In addition, we would like input an Councils thoughts on _
designated routes, how many companies, staging-areas in the Town
and/or on TOV owned property, carriages vs. sleighs, etc.
It is staffs recommendation that (1) the companies be allowed to
continue operations, (2) the carriages not co-mingle in the "gated"
bus route areas with existing traffic, (3) the Town should
establish "off-limit" areas of operation, (4) the companies be
charged for TOV expenses relating to ensuring/providing training,
equipment safety, and other compliance issues, and (5) strict
standards of operation be established and the companies be held
accountable to these standards.
TOWN OF VAIL ~
75 South Frontage Road Department of Public Works/Transportation
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2166
MEMORANDIIM
T0: Ron Phillips
FROM: Greg Hall
Ken Hughey
DATE: February 24, 1992
RE: Village Loading Issues to be Recommended
in the Master Transportation Plan
At the January 14 public meeting on the Master Transportation
Plan, it was decided that Town of Vail staff would bring Village
loading options back to the Council. The options available are
varied and diverse, with any part/mix of options available for
consideration. It is, however, important to first establish the
desired goals regarding vehicular traffic and truck delivery in
the Village. The options discussed below are based on a varied
range and degree of vehicle restrictions. Staff has attempted to
select a recommended degree of restriction based upon the input
at the public meeting and input gained through the Parking and
Transportation Advisory Committee's work.
To develop ar. adequate foundation of the base issue, it is
valuable to review statistics gathered by the Police Department
at Checkpoint Charlie. This information can then be used as a
benchmark by which to measure the degree of success after changes
in restrictions are made.
The information covers the 44,000 vehicles through Checkpoint
Charlie during the period from September 5 to December 31, 1991,
and is as follows:
1. Cars: (Total = 13,089/300)
Request to enter the Core for tasks such as, small .
deliveries, people, etc.
Memorandum Regarding Village Delivery Issues .
February 24, 1992
Page 2
2. Delivery Cars: (Total = 3,747/8.5%)
' These are cars actually delivering or picking up sizable
amounts of goods.
3. Delivery Trucks,: (Total = 5,261/12%)
These are trucks servicing restaurants, lodges, retail
stores,. etc. and include UPS, Federal Express and the US
Post Office.
4. Construction Vehicles: (Total = 4,255/9.70)
These are vehicles associated with construction projects and
service vehicles (plumbers, electricians, etc.).
5. Town of Vail: (Total = 1,790/4.1%)
These are Town of Vail vehicles, including police and fire
vehicles.
6. Taxis: (Total = 1,109/2.50)
This includes taxis, van services and limo's.
7. "L~St" ~Tehicles: (Total = 14, 642/33.4%)
These are vehicles whose occupants are lost, seeking
directions, or are merely "driving around".
It should be noted other .vehicles enter the Core area by coming
in the wrong way via Gore Creek Drive and Hanson Ranch Road.
Below is the Average Daily Summary for December
Total Volume = 475 vehicles/day, which consists of:
Cars 126/Day
Lost Cars 159/Day
Delivery Cars 45/Day
Delivery Trucks 55/Day
TOTAL DELIVERY 100/Day
Construction Vehicles 40/Day
Town of Vail 25/day .
Taxis 25/Day
Memorandum Regarding Village Delivery Issues
February 24', 1992
Page 3
Options and Staff Recommendations
1. Modify Policies at Checkpoint Charlie.
a. Eliminate 300 of the traffic (cars) through use of the
1~'z hours of free parking in the Vail Parking Structure
for this type of need.
Designate a desirable area of the Vail Parking
Structure for short term parking.
o Enforcement of this issue would be key to its
success. Educate the users that the Town is
providing convenient short term spots in the Vail
Parking Structure, however, abuse of these spots
will result in strict enforcement.
b. Develop written policies concerning others requiring
. access to the Village such as:
~ Cars without large amounts of goods to be
delivered will not be allowed in the Village or in
the loading zones. Use of the parking structure
would be required for these trips..
• Trucks and cars that are making deliveries of
large quantities of goods will be allowed access
.to the Village load zones and will be given
priority for these zones. Time will be limited to
only what is needed to load or unload these goods.
In addition, a permitting process could be
established to access these zones.
• The towing of vehicles for excessive time in these
load zones will be strictly enforced. .
o Construction work requiring parking will need to
be planned and approved in advance by the Town of
Vail Building Department and Police Department.
o Service vehicles will be allowed limited access to
some loading zones for emergency work only. Non-
emergency service work should be scheduled for
non-peak traffic hours in the Village. All
service vehicles will need to contact the Police
Department for a parking permit for both the
emergency and non-emergency work.
Memorandum Regarding Village Delivery Issues
February 24, 1992
Page 4
• All loading zone restrictions will be lifted after
6:00 p.m., except that the zones in the Core (Gore
Creek Drive, Bridge Street, Hanson Ranch Road from
Bridge Street to Hanson Ranch Chute) will be a "No
Parking Area" after 6:00 p.m.
c. Investigate the possibility of locating "drop boxes" in
designated places for overnight couriers.
2. Select choices from the following menu as desired by
Council.
a. Adopt the short term recommendations of the
transportation plan or some variation.
b. Eliminate loading zones on Bridge Street only.
. c. Eliminate loading zones on Bridge Street and Hanson
Ranch Road near Mill Creek only.
d. Allow only morning use of the Gore Creek Drive loading
(Lodge Promenade).
e. Allow 15 minute parking below the Christiania lot (Gore
Creek Drive) to remain "as is".
f. Convert the 15 minute parking areas on the north side
of the Christiania lot and adjacent to Riva Ridge North
to delivery and service vehicles only.
g. Install "One Way/Do Not Enter" signs further north on
Willow Bridge Road. .
h. Convert the 15 minute parking north of Willow Bridge to
truck only.
3. Authorize capital improvements in an attempt to reduce the
33% "lost guest" number and those who enter the Village the
wrong way.
a. Move Checkpoint Charlie as recommended by
Transportation Plan and Streetscape Plan.
b. Construct the landscaped medians south down Vail Road
from the Frontage Road.
c. Look into informational and directional signing
clarifications and modify as needed.
Memorandum Regarding Village Delivery Issues
February 24, 1992
Page 5
d. Construct entry feature monument signs at all entry
points to pedestrian areas.
e. Prior to construction of monument signs provide and
install a standard sign which warns motorists with the
wording "Auto Restricted Zone Ahead" at all pedestrian
zone entry points.
f. Install additional gates.
g. Install additional check points.
4. Review the information signs and traffic control procedures
at I-70 off ramps at 4-way.
a. Test closing the Main Vail Ramps.
b. Install portable variable message signs at the 4-way
(Vail Road median) and the I-70 off ramps providing
clear messages to drivers based on demand.
c. Develop action policies for the following groups; (1)
CSO's in Village, (2) 4-way traffic controllers, (3)
checkpoint personnel, (4) parking structure operations
and other Town employees regarding (1). enforcement, ~(2)
who is allowed to access the Village and (3) when to
tow. Evaluate disallowing certain traffic movements
during peak demand periods based on traffic demands and
circumstances.
5. Work with Vail Associates in designating allowed skier drop
off areas. This would be in an attempt to recognize the
problem versus banning all skier drop offs.
The Town staff recommends that Council adopt the following
options from the list above:'
Short Term: 1 (a) , (b) , (c) , 2 (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , 5.
Long Term: 3 (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) and .4 (b) , (c) .
Long Term Solutions
1. Christiania lot
a. Resolve the ownership issues.
b. Evaluate in greater detail:
I
Memorandum Regarding Village Delivery Issues
February 24, 1992
Page 6
• Technological options of hand cart deliveries and
small vehicle for deliveries and storage lockers.
o Operational characteristics and regulations for .
hand carts and small vehicles along with liability
issues, storage problems and financing option.
o Can the site be aesthetically compatible with the
neighborhood and still operational for the truck
delivery functions?
2. Other sites:
a. South of Lodge at Vail ~
• Resolve ownership and legal issues.
• Compatibility with International Wing development
plans.
• Vail Associates Concerns.
® United States Forest Service concerns.
b. Gold Peak
• Ownership issues.
• Vail Associates concerns.
c. Other sites
The staff recommends a strong commitment on the part of the~Town
Council to pursue a long term solution to the loading and deliver
issue.
GH/dsr
RPTC.DEL
~ -
- ~ -
' • ~ .r e it rw • .
4~ ~2' ~ p p~~=~w;_i -.A. ~v, ~`ar 'otit..~ r`an' v
LsR` ,~,y.~~ ~
1~
vYX_~ 'r ~ . •.t. ~ - rya - `
a~ -a-.
M.•,L. C • . f
• ~ i . Y ? 5.~~..
_ • l
- J - me .^~^a°r:
`
:
};sky
o _ a.~` 4~ ~'a
~ ~ F
ICY' b~ ni~. ~ _ Try ..'~"jN, •y ~ 1 . ~ ~i
i ti a t V
1 Ate: C Y i ~ w i.-
'1 _.y to i' '~V~=q~k``
. gip..
~ _
y n -J:%P, ~y' ~ ..~y~ Q r a 9- a_. ~ e_•G- .°i'Y.. mot' A~
• ~ ' ` b
~ ~ c ~1'~ ' _ a- r..w~nRk
i',:~!~
.!'-.'~t~"~i a ~1. ~ : ~S~ ~=`ar . r~ -
- _ -
:a _ 3:: t.
Vii::.. '
• .Q~.. •
• 'S"•. s
P:. •
_ ry ~
IUI ^ .f. _ f
'ti va Wq ~ ^ 4' s ^pga/'v at' P~I^.Er• Vic. ~pf a~~
•p' .,~R a°L- .may _ ~CSr• _x~. »e'.F ~:~:'re re:s~
--5,~
1 • _ ~~'..L.
f p;a- ~.y-
I, C~ ~
. tic b .:wc?~!t 'A.~
-S l.'.~'^ ~;,y :mac- ~ Iii t. ?t.4'6r~ `~f:~
1. f ~ ~ ~Y.
x,13 . _ ~ • i nn ~ ? . r.
~ L '•'rtz - ~/•"-t.='?~ • - = o- . a Z:
• ~•~~',Talir~''`iTr~~r-ice 7~ ; _ i~~a-'! e~ - ! , i J •
s. ~r..~
j'~ ~ ) ~ `.I- ' r q • it
t~`~~ R L Al ~ hf~t`V~r.~ ~YYt_ 7~i72f,~.l~i' ° c ly Ya
•~l"s : t d.~ GS J~, r 1 i z J r- .4'x. ~y M~ .
? , . ..a. h., t F.
n - 4+'-
A fi, . ..r ~e i..
r. .
S F. .
. w _ v +AM1 -
1~{'~- x'"4 ~~o~>:.'~5; S ~t~?^ s. `t i L.t ~i~ s. r ~,1~'v~;vs~ '•'r: si ~.•y;.'.4'~ ~„C
~k t. l.`~ !`y~r ~ ; i5:. `fl. 3 n t~rLM',~.~~ 'fi'' .:~a.E t~• ~ tLN 'lRx4 I
.y Y
x. , ~ Y ~kH~I B IT?..~ K3 :'S ~ T L Y J. ~ R. F~ C
% _ _ . J R 7 1 ' X' i Ili ~I~
j1. u D nti l i'r ~„1,.r'f : ~ Ate. ,r~,r s
1 ~ `p ~ ifs s . ~ - ~ . r f,4~~~. .
y,~j z - B
~1 ~I` 5
~ ~t
.~?LL-
,c;, .
_
asF.
~.y
_ - ;~t.
:,.4C ~ ~ ~ ~ YLy .
'^t:, '.1
'X~ ~ '
_ ~
. y '
• .r'
F _ 2' ^
~ e.t t.. .-f ~ t^~7~ .k.r~t .:~~z:~~~~ 1 .'v~2 J •F.7~n' Oar„Q? 1G~.,,~: r~~ { ~-Fj" 'T^'^' `fir ~~$y~,Shi`t'- y'~^.H
i~,~+.tr to C- 1, 2 ~^r~^.; er•.r y}h,,YN
O t ~ } J:• ~ _ a , i s 'M ' ~sV r is-f y// vSL ~ 47~ ;'r gk'~'~ 'sue
J..' ~ r j i fl N T t M7 ~ i,,. ~o; h 1jr Y ~r ~Y+'P .l ~ yyyyy ~ aa ' .S
s ' ~ -o r.'x;: f :.,t~ ~ es~~. . , 5 r; ~ t Z_ '•~t!~}ly.~"=«;~'"~ ~ ,h"~A7~1~'fl 7. ..:.Z--,
.d > -i.
> S
a.•i~rr fin{ ~ ~ ~ .,iS
~ ;t:: ~
t .
~:a;.:
` ~ ~ 1'iIIS 11CRF:I;hLNT, dated r~s of the /f~ d~~y of ii/~ ~
- ,,a
' A ~ ~
rid'.
• :9~;8, between VAIL T,SSOCIATES, INC., a Colorado corporati~.a ~
_
. ~ `
' ~ ~aereinaiter referred to vs VAIL ASSOCIATES), CiIRISTIANIh- ~ _
• •.~j
~;_-'~1liL,~ INC. , a Colorado corporation (hereinafter refcrrc::.
X•'I
to a:; CHR=STI~,NIA) , and the TOW\ Oi VAIL, a Colorado ;-,unit-
_ __•ipai corporation (hereinafter referred to as TOWN):
_ -
W I T N E S S E ,.T H: ,,^j
~s
WPiEREAS, by warranty deed dated July 8, 1963, VAIL
ASSOCIATES conveyed certain property, including Lot d, IIlocJc
_ 2, Vaii Village, .First tiling, according to the recorded
• - ~ pia;. thereof, to CIIRISTIANIA, and on the s~~me day the above
• _
;parties executed an Ar,reeracnt, gated July £i, 1963, more
i
_
. cotrtr.only called a landowner's agreement; and ~
`
• Sn':-iEREAS, s•absequent to such sale to CHRISTIANIA, por-
.
tions of land owned by VAIL ASSOCIATES adjoining the lot
' ~ ~ ~ -
sole :.o CIiRISTIANIA were replatted and are now designated
as VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING; and .
i~ilcRzAS, upon the formation of the TOWN, VAIL ASSOCIATES ~
• ~ c;~~dic~~ted the roads located on the plats within the bound- ~
arics of the TOWN to public use, and conveyed its right,...
~ - i
- - a
c- _ 11
.
I
j
>e:a:{St: ~i,;rti:~ ~i i ~ r.i ~.52 ~ ~ r viy yT , ..~y Ts.: :?`:i' _ $ ~ - q ,,{bY~,
~ titlr and interc::~t in surh ro~~dwa~ s to thc:~ T W ~
; 4: :.,ray,
' ~iccepting -such ~%'nnve,yancr• ~
~ ~7nd
•
.
•
- A'I1ERE11S, s~ibsc uc.nt to s ~ ~
_ ~~~:~_t.._.:°~_... ; _ _ q uch dc~. ication and acceptance - ~`~~~=j
..J. ~ of the roadw~iys to the TOWN the
TOWN, with the knowledge - = -:r;
ara consent of PAIL ASSOCIATES and CF~ISTIANIA, constructed _ _ -
V;
. a roadw~iy across Lat P-3 connecting Gore Creek Drive and
~ Manson Ranch Road to the west of and in Iicu of. the connect-
- _
ing roadway as shown on the plat of VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH .
_ PILING. and the TOWN intends that such constructed roadway
will be made a public roadway end that the connecting road-
ti
w.~y shown on the pl~-~t of VAIL VIL7.AGE, FIFTH TILING will be
" ,4
~ - - ~
vacated and title transferred back to VAIL ASSOCIATES; and ~-.:I
WHE~AS, it is in the interests of all the parties _
.
• that these matters be clarifi~•a,
~'OW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
• - m..de by each herein, r.hc p,-~rties arree as follows:
_ 1. .VAIL ASSOCIATES will dedicate to the public and " `
convey. to the TOt~+7,~i ~a curved, forty foot (40') right-of-way -
aCro:,~ the westerly portion of Lot P-3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH -
i ~°:FILT;IG (and CHRISTIANIA consents to such conveyance), pro-
' vided the TOWN will provide VAIL A:~SOCIATES an indemnifica- J
~ tion end hold harmless agreement for any liability or
. ;
-Z- .
+ Y3'~.
~
~~i~si' ~'l~/fY .441~~~kY- •a t ~ t ~.1~f` ~ a~" r f ~4 r' ~ i~ i l~ tnT ~ ~S 'i~~ ~ - .Ff.+~ ~ ? yet t F.{i~5'~1~4 Sf~Q
V ! t ? - i~ ! f 4 1 S 4 - 4` t iY ~ ! 'ti*ip ~3¢+ 6.}
a~ ~ ;
~ ~ ~ ~ " ' incluclin thr defense of any liti- =
_ A~ f •throatenrd ~liabil .ty C 9
Y:•.::.: , - ~ out of such dedication r ty..."_ . -
Py
~.c~aten. cl,im or ~ 3einand) arising 1, ~j: ,
~tY ;i n.; s . r + ` ~t.
~i a ,
-,and conveyance tc the TOWN. Should the TOWN not provide..
"`3~'`` ~ sueh an indemnigication and hold harmless agreement, then _:,F,
the TOWN will institute appropriate condemnation proceed- ,
ings to obtain sLCh~ a roadway and will prosecute ouch ~-::-y;::~.,
:...proceedings to a successful conclusion as promptly as _ - Y
_ _ .
~,;r:-, ~ possible . ~ : ' .
~
~
k~~.'' 2. At the same time the TOWN will vacate the connect-
r~-
ff~_ r~ . - ,
i,., -R' ~
ing roadway between Gore Creek Drive and Hanson Ranch Road _
.A,,,_ as shown on the plat of VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING. Such ,
. _y ~ -
- - vacated roadway shall revert to VAIL ASSOCIATES, and only
.
f .
upon obtaining a fee simple title to such roadway shall VAIL
ASSOCIATES be required to convey the substitute connecting
era ra h 1. I ' ~
roadway as set forth in p g P
_
• ~ 3. That portion of Lot P-3, VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH
FILING remaining after the subtraction of the new roadway,;
~ - ,together with a rectangular portion of the vacated roadway ' _ '
~ adjoining Lot P-3,.VAIL VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING, forty feet
: ~ - ~40') in width extending to the east between the aoutherl.y
~ `
+zv;: - ' 'right-of-way boundary of Gore Creek Drive extended and the r.
. -
j
. :I
-3-
- .
' T K + ~``3.~ `eva .ems^y~~r Sl~i. ti ~S4° t :i
..var. ~ " .yr' ~ rh`~f
~ . ~ ~.~northarly rightrc g-way boundary •.ot.Nanson Ranch Roafl _ ~,t, ;
' ; •extended,. shall .g •e used for the purroses and 'uses as ~--~.5 ~ ~
,,t~ .
set ~ forth ~ for Lo+ P-3, VAIL ViLLACE, FIFTH FZLINCi, in ~ ~ t ~ t
~ L'ne protective e~ versants for VA2L VILLAGE, FIFTH FILING '
~~filed for record .on November 15, 1965 'in Book 187 at
.Page 353 ~f the real property records, Eagle County, . .
Colorado
4. CHRISTIANIA shall receive identical easement '
. .
' " ~ ri hts in and on that
g portion of the vacated. roadway
des~~ribed in paragraph 3 above; adjoining Lot P-3, upon
~ - ~ such roadway being vacated and fee simple title vesting
' ~ in VAIL ASSOCIATES. At such time, VAIL ASSOCIATES will '
. - -
• execute and deliver to CHRISTIANIA the necessary easement
_ .
grant in recordable form.
5. The non-exclusive perpetual easement and right
to use Lot P-3 as and fora public parking lot for passenger
f- automobiles granted initially by VAIL ASSOCIATES to
CHRISTIANIA shall continue, but only for the westerly.
por~ion of Lot d, Block 2, Vail Village, First Filing
~ conveyed by CHRISTIANIA to a third party. CHRISTIANIA,
at tha time of such conveyance, will record the appropriate
. - '
. document, in recordable form, showing such easement to run ~ •
F•
1 . y ~
^t
''3. her 1. + .-l1~ .F~`r YF .f {
. ~r 'YY
pp F 4 11 A l ;.i a- ~ S i Y r J
~ ~ ?„C., t •a.-(1. j j Yy~y.(Yb / ~ ~ .At ~ -•S A I f 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .
S t 4 ~ L 9 "j4' Rt4',( ~S : .r .~]q~`y~~ .y. V 1 ! 4
~z bJ f ttx ~ it ~ ~ ~ r, ~
..s.
`~e ~ .,;,,,1., w itl~ t•~,r~t `~ort.i.un'~'of Lot d, Block 2, Vait Villa e - - -
~y.. ~ - - ,
: irstr Filing, ~tit1d not with th~it ?or. lion of Lot d, F31ock ~ .
~ _
~ x 2,:Vai1 V.illage`~, First Filing not convcycc~.
- G. In th.~ event thit CIIRISTInNIA conveys fee simple ~ ~ ~
-
t:.tle to the wc+f;terly portion cf Lot d, iiiock 2, v,~il
Village, °irst~Fi.ling within the next /Bo days, anti
troth the purchaser and Ci?RZS~TI1!Ir'IA execute and deliver to . -
Vr1IL ASSL~CiATES la,~~c~owner's agreE~monts^ in the form attached
hereto, and Lhe pu:'ch7ser has agreed in writing to the terns
3~• of this Agreement as they rei~~te to the ro~:dw•,ys, Lot P-3,
VAIL VILLP,GE, FIFTH I'iZ.IA'~~, and the non-exclusive e~isement - ,
t~ - ::or parking, VAIL ~1.•.`'i4ClAT%S will waive all rights it has
' - . _ ~ ~ - -
or. may have in the ac~rcrym,~nt ~.].~teci 3uly 8, 196 bc.~tween
V 1SSOC ATES and .i1R ST 1lNrA ~~^.d the terms of the new
AIL t I C Z Z ,
. landowner's agreement attached hereto shall take th~~ place ,
of such prior agreeu~ent; and spcci:ically, CHRISTIA~'IA and
~ ~ .
the purchaser agree to conform with the rules r,nd regulations
of the Planning and Architectural Control Committee, zoning
.
Lt~ws, protective covenants, r.rles ~~nd regulations covering i
Vail Village, Fir:~t filing ~~nd Vail Village, Fifth Filing. ~ "
.
~ - 7 . Tn ;.s aq rcemcr,t shall inure to the benef 1 t of and
- .
.
~ he 't,inding cpon the heirs, successor: and assigns of the
L
%_r .
.`TT..
-5-
X' i n. _ ~~r ; is>,. ..t.` e ,i\ SiSe;a;'F ~•e,~ _ ~yy ~ v:;~„-ati ~ ..;SrX.• :r J
» -CL ~3 yaa'Sa" ' e ~..,j'L- ~ ,,a,~ 4G ~ Y ~ II ~ 1' n'J. Y ^s~.,, y C ;
~ t ~ ~ 1 ~ s 4 - C ~ 1
J'y ~ T ~4 ~i7x•Y ~y ~ L.r {e..y~ ?'~1 I~, C y ~ `
`r`~s~ Y, t. ;.4 4~ 1 M y''. ' t
c _g,,S lJ. ~ t rr 4 4' t N N ! I 4yy ~~ki5 t4~i
i i~~'jk~ ~ t by ~j ya ' a ~ :4 l~{ " S~r`i~~~ ~~`t.
:p. I~ J( c ~ j;
1 S Y
~ l: ~t ~ S5 ~ ' ' `.fit' c ;i : l
_ ti~r~ icb hereto. T1,~ mas~ulina of ~~rr~ word usrd herAin shall ,
.~r. ; a
``.r:,,~. uC,~:corigtrued to `include,,tha feminine and neuter gender _ t
.S ..g. _
~ th~•reof; zinc: tine singular the plural, whenever necessary
s _ . .
-
fnr proper constr action. .
IN WITtii:5S ~V H,;REOF, the p~~rties h~~ve executed this .
ae:r.~~ment eifectri~e~as of the day and year first above
.
wzitten.
VAZL ASS _IA' ZN,C.
~Y
f.'
ATTEST:
.
CHRISTIANIA-AT-NAIL, Ii:
Sea 1) % '
~Y.. -
.
1n ~ }
f." ~ rt liG i~~7~~ ~1 VA1 L,
r ~ Y / ~-t.L-
ATTEST: / ~
f
r;. ,
/ ~ .
~1
N-;`
AATIFISD AND ApPROYED bay 31, 1968.
t~;
•
1d.C.T. , INC.
_ ~
j; .
F ~
,
j By ~ ~ Ares dent
h.
'
.
P~L
t~~`:
t~, ~
r'
j
UNPLATTED ~ , _
' EAGLE COUNTY ~ `
' WHITE RIVER f~ATIC
'
J ~ ,
TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY
UNPLATTED
VAIL VILLAGE 1ST,
PART OF TRACT B
TYROLEAN CONDOMINIUMS
VAI VILLA ist. FILING
® O CORNICE o
E4S~ M: ADOW p~~ ~
AIL vN'
C MOUNTAIN TRACT D •
HAUS ATHLETIC APOLLO PARK
292 CLUB 442 •
52 VAIL TRAI AILVILCL GE WREN ' ' INTERSTATE
SLiFZ RO BLO PLAUF~R Ig`' W \ ISL f I NG 500 ~
385 ~ I TRA S
' cR AST
232 ,OH E = 3 •
,~ORSUC W 13 w , ~ LLAG ~ TENNIS COURTS
263 J ' CMILDRENS PARK
I <.o GP RD~ ~ EXAS
?UCKSACK ~ ®C . 30 4~W OF K r^ P-2 WNHOUSE 1~ '
280 ~ VIL A6ODS < 3 ~
r<ED LION a = 3 0 365 ALL ~~r
- ~ H ~ sEASO s PARK _
aPNGH c R S 4 4
H TIAN TIVOLI - o N P-I
n
I I C 6 2 D-I 3B6 ~ 416 A 3 m TRACT
A B ICYRANO'S TRACT F-I • F-2
FORD
GOH~PEA TRACT E 298 MANOR AMPITHEATER
278 VAIL
315 305 30 595 NATURE
325 2 3 CENTER
I
R 302 4, 601 •
2 15VI LMS 7 B 395 GPEAKN \ ~ 620 O
gg 18 TRACT F q58 \ JP\~'.1P~-~'
~ 4 392
I 85 ~ •
3211 10 ~ SOCCER FIELD
C/~F 342 9 IT ~ SKI CL • TRACT A
• fk CRC c 362 375 VA CHIIDRENS 498 VAIL _
SKI CENTER sae s
r-~'.ar- __ttpp r VJ/t[(''jw~ 0~ r ~ D 1', ~°Y B ~ . ~ c~ .v ~L "p ~,"pv~~+"- 6'
~ rb ~ ~ ~d'a ~1~'~w0 W ~ I ~ ~ ' 1'. ~B~ -~~,r~ta •1'~ct Op~ .~U,. Y~~, 'r. ?t,~
_ ~ gg p~~a~i~~ p } ~ v p
~ ~~NN~NA° ~ a+ V ~wr ~ _ 6Vy ~.'oij .f" `o~,i. y~'y f° r i A~ ~ 0~ ti
,,q~' t o rr x O Z7 `b ~p0 ~ " I ~ •B~ 7 ` ~ ~IO~
w- -rh„ tJ. IN~WO°(N,S' N `,N. ° Gt ,.4) ~ ' i,a 1~ 9 RA a i
r C V _ CO O~~ O ' F-N~IV O ° ° ~ '-N v { : , C r to ~
- V _ ~ ; (J~ • W _ ~ ~a CO :
N N,::' ':Oo r o ~ r ° ` ~~O \w ` , ~ 0:;.. ~ s et. 1.
_ r os~ n ~ ~ p S
ETC *ti = 4?..23r ~ ~ `W` ~l ~+~IN •W~~" ~ :W<'~~~~ s ~ _(1j-r..;,. .,1,,•:
.,a,, Rai ~ , a /yam r Q /y~~/~ ~(I,I N i_1 0 a e t • C'j ,r Q°\
E ~ C.?c .P . - ~ 8 A~ ® M ~ ,$~y M? O D/1 W.O q N s'- ~4 7
_ ~ aI ~S 4 ~~/O~a ~ „ • _ 'Y {?Y. ~ +V~o~V.~~p - ?i 1 .a~~~ ~
' 1Il i ~ ~ a Y .
f ~•~~'#r?iftiA~~'1e ~ O\\ s6•~r LII 2`j~'~ y Q~~s Q~d~rr rp~n.~ A''r'r LFa e, a t .n~ 1:t ~ 'r,~ r a YI"t a rde. ~i,
~ ~ 9 $1' , a -'11°03 ~1.'r ~ r0 CaI ~ ;y4 V~ .~g~ `
R ~ ~
oe ~ ~ N ~ 8?~. 8~?, 'g81.7~r `1122 r 'I y k " ! r r~ - t5t~:a
9 2 f~
t~ <~„-:~e'~. m t ~ ~ ~ 6b~'. _ `~o' 9 .90' . ~,/q~E° ~ 4 q @ ~ p, s160 s '~r~
*sy,~a ~`i _ r`( tr ~ ~ ~ " y ~ : dC/1 O r ~.I~.{ ~ ' t 11',r 98x T C , y ~ t t.M~i-~.-
,,.~,V_ k i~_:~ ~ '`I1 '484 - ~ ,tit Rc j ~ .~4 psay'~'t + ,rt>< - A:~ ~ 3. ~
° ~~~r~ , . Qtj O ~ . ® ~ s° 1160 T ~L; a C ,
` ° X210 ~ R,ze
'1`,! ~ ~ ~ ~ ?vg• ~ , Ra./0 363" ~ ~ ~ : ~ r~• F • ri,=Vr _
t , ~ s O s . J, I.~ ~
a : ~ ~ ~ t. ,ti, J? ~ ,r m 3y 72'Q
4 -e ,s ;:;'-°''s ~R ~r. Ky: ~ r
- O o1t,7.'9 s x ,r ~~-~t°~.,~: Ey r ~~3 a ~ ~ ~ ~5 a a - ,,,p -
~ 5 Y, > . A-.O gg ~ 8..~ ~~t ;:rsr' t,~.' ~„~o~:~L' t _ 3 t1
r C. 4. - ~i 1 ~ i~7 .I.. e.t. -„G - /',,Y 'Y. ~•l~- rP'. '=1\," N {;r~'~ _ =t`z`s' -e '.i'acw
. q x _ ~ .v
~ "~.r+v ~ r , , O;
: O' ~.~s. ?,yam x - -
r. ~ .p &3..
7~ by ~ ~ • . t 3 : • w ~
p' < . I ° ' Gbh 'j r0$ ° t I~ 'V (p ~.N~" 'st . , ~ °S k: „ ~ r~ .
2 D s I /s C~ ~
; ` ' , D, sat ~Q• J r ^n ~ x~ - ~`a' "~.FF'. 8'9'?. '
i. 4 _ ~ - ~0,• ~y9 ~ .a r(~,.8 s ~ at',.a ors t ° zy, ,a,~s'w 2 ~ y:,.-r
~,,'I~ .Q
` - S :fps t~ Ojr 4 ctr ~x'~,.~~?'' n/ ~ r - _`9~.
/ ~ + - r; ,r. -:f` :O~ , ~v'r~~ ~ q ~~,~i<' ,hi`?+d 4~oy~`C~.i~ d ~~O -y Op t
.t n + i ~i' 'i ,V v }1 Mi, j:.s f r " ~ .x. ~f rl'' N
~nr " Ova t}' ,~;ric•~,. e' ~~.r kart ~ i '0 r
f'L.'+`:..~p ~ ~rt~ ...k• O. •~.vA - ~"~l* O °rS .T' :~r~. aa. r, v. }-.fit .'.sr3'~l ,2'. +~'a•a. i:,, •iQ ~ ~,:5. ~
+r'~• ~iZ =`t. 'G ~ ~ ? rr ,'Q E ~ N YTarf,', .:r. !'i ~'#~i ~ "'?'~i :'~Y~ Y r.~ } c M..`
_ r. ?:.r „ ~ Q~~~ t k y R.. ~ .,tlse,• o r =~rr~ :y~, ,00 c
' .t;,..,~ . - 4 ,k~~~ • y ro~ ~ ,IZC r;8 uf2.09, A t~.=?'~`g ~
f ~ ` O J. ^•S, i, i' V r ~±Y ~ ~ •Y.:75 S; '/T Ti Y'Y?. ` n'~n ~'4'V Y ,.y.~ ~p
_
va~ n_ :.~Z t ~ . c , d- sYa:. `T ,{-~rr r 3. j - • ~~cr • i¢
_a~~
'y;~~ - 4 tS .M a M r,.iT 8.7- •"a V~4 ~ CuFi ~r'.'w .dg'' r
;~a .a. r'1. .a at ,.r> ..T¢. ~.sy 'O R,,: ='k' ,r;`~.• .a.
Yy~: a - ~ t~- s ;r•;,,3 / r ^.i-~;. f.ax 'rs,..A _ r'7..~'l.st .x..
i.. ~ p .mot y. _ r. y s.:.~.z.'. 7v w Qr• ~ :a; w ,~~LC ~ ~ ~ -,;aE;>., r, ,~3r' n N v<i .
:
r: n Rk' ~r~~ r~` y ~ \ J } j• ~.F"j ~..l ~/OYv'r~'~'~1.77t':f T ~,.~•v r .,,tar' 34 r' s,„ n. -r,~ r
qA~
;K v 5, s-~ .'a:. 'A O ~r - `t 'ry ?3 .mss +r~ ..r.~ w~ ~~O .k c h.
l`-
;S_r;~'~: F£C V'-~ G .7 ..f °hA J. ~'a~-- •"?'~Sk- K'~r.~ '°,~;T.=7 i.;,,'' ~ i~ 7+:
1,+~. -,r. -t
S~. "5 Y~ z. \ . _ : ®i: A r.d' 'I r.;~N ai._ ti' ~ a;~:, ,;,~~,x..- ~f ~•J` sat; G1. , t n,.~
,':s Sr. 'tI r rt- - tr^ r t.; ,r I ~qq ! ~ -.s"~}~ ..7.~~G a r~ y~ Fri v
r•
_rY- Y.~Y: k-'~ 'rt4 s~.r ..rN, s,;1 .£~A'- „~•tiv x-' » ,F~ LL •,.r. ~ . 2; ,:h,'.O ~•l'r"+:
d: qt$ J ..J Y r - w 'v t, ti., r, ,7~ `x. ~ ~ 7 7r, c:. 'N•.. fr; 0., ~~qz~;- ,...yt l ~,1,•' - ':.x-r 1r, .~,~,}J.s'x." W p. ~ '6 '-.Yj~a, ,zt a1
:^a, n: k: x. IA.„r.~ ~>6 ; .;p, ~ -~r$ ~r , ,,,r ~ h '~N 's.p 1 ,,~±...y{-: a?r ~i. a;
a~v=+~~w ~.'~.x?. ~ t'`{/~'•....-'a,. .t ..i / o! t. .-s r,~1;:,< _ @r,3 .'I' ^-r..: 5.. y - u,_ -f~ ~M. :;F .~n`~
+'4{:'; g .../4./ o t n~~' p~' ~,u:J fMJ j Q - .,K x,•, .-~'~t~yJ . d~'' T ,"v'€- , ~ :
- ,
~ ,
.cs^ - ~ ~ 'V _ a S.. //Y ~Th S ? ~~S ~ M. ~''M F v`,
. _
f ~ t ,,:t - ~ O v,T ~r 't ,~a;~~ I ~ m n+-.<s ~ Y' y wr'r r"- - 2 ~,,r'"h-i
-w' •4 fd ~ ~ r 4 4, r;'; F: y3rs. \v j.. A -:,1,.~+r f rZ ~3'' Jrr• A » 3r i "kt.
:Kt? x. wA:• ~1 b,: `I "T' ~.;4i~,. F E-'t.: "-~T+~r,:,y ~ 1 .~P, r~.
.gyp R1•_ .?1 x.= er ~~"3,iua - ~ .
f ,„,t , w{.~"~C: - 9C' qY~ r ~ _ : k : ~ . 2 t{~ \ aA~~ ~ ~ - V z+,t.: 'i' a` i 3~.~ - rC ~ •s• u ° v ,~i ..r.. d~^:
is M a. d,
uP
G - t _
.;'r,. fs;`` a. ~ ;F `~JQ r~ ~ H3 ~1..':;: 'e ~ } eti": 9 _ c?t.C ~j-",Fitt, ~',C
r. n _ ~ 0 • rat i.. r•e z'.. x O._ i~~ - ,€Fr S t" +G'` : -.y- r, ~ i. r~
r r>'' . ~ S 'F•'•'...' . n. - ,c ,v; . ~ 'B ~J:. fi t g t"c•~.> v: xr:-c ® ...T+. ~~'iQ , `i"S.
a ~ ~ ~ " C~~-t 4 4 ?o as ~.^~T. :178
e.- :_r.~ ~ ~ ~i .(A '"'4.,c. ~ ~~~YrY. ',5`E ~'6i4kN. Ya..:?~ y;,y ~'r ~•!x r.r~1. rd- .r.
r,c~M1,yc..7. •r r; d vy~ _ -a ~O;qx c t, ~ uC- r,.~ sJ rY ~ ~F 'i r :i pa ,r~~ "Ar ~~'~Z' 4 _G` Q~~~
~E..• ~ '~:l r. ,r. ri%; o, t ~dp~ 5-. \t ~ d. r''~+:i.`~ ~0.•7~. •~r. r.r :9 .~'!o
, ~,4 fl . Q,_., ~ • ~ ~t-`'r ~ - 241 70 _ , Il.1TY'
."'U,Zn V' f rr~ ,i~~. .s. d ~kyr ~y.k. ~y- ~ a-4.~r 5.00.E .~5 ~T- E
.{•..T vz ~ .4 j: 5. r,'q 'f`,d"ry d{"'r _ tte'+, 1 . t ~R S Yr„' I• .
Y o-r~ ~3 b ~ 70
s~~ `I®® , _ ~ s>v,~'.`''-~ ~ t `,;tt {1 F ~l1~?2.88 /16~,COR i
-.r~" '~'~~..Tf r a~4. Y"' x~ fi }r r ''S. Sa4.''r a+r; 1
j~t7' tr 04~ ' ~ 3 6 1 4eM f•~(R~ ~ C i,.
Z g NO..._._-gym - - _ ~ , • , _ ~
, ~
. l~ ~ ~ .
~ '
,1 /
p}VEO -
f .
J ~ l~ J-.
- ~ - lad .
Or.K ~-i
mow,. ~ I.:~ ~ o
~ SCALE I"' 10~
_r~
•IS.QO~
p ~SW)'~ ~ - - ' '
~ i
- ate.
• ev
ppR~
yy 1
~1 ~ % ~ r 980 `p6
.10 /(9
i
' '
r
1 ~
~Y "~kCH
~oqo ~
® ~ ~ -
a l -
.1 ~ ~ .
\ y .
\ • ~ ~ ~ GORE CREEK DRIVE,(40'. Row) ~ . ~ ARCHITECTURAL -;SURVEY
~ .MILL •CREEK COURT...BUILDING
' b R _ u..)r
°-xri.'~ VAIL COLORADO • .
_ _ ~ -19..Tx' LOT i, HLOCK 5-A
~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ w.. VAIL VILLAGE FIFfH FILIIVG
~m
osr ~ •wrnn ~ '
' \ ,I
\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ \
F} ` Lun•
,.,Re, ® i
• ~ A ' LOT i ~ '
\ s •
• C'~ i .
• ~
' S loo real r~oao uru /1 ~ • ' ~ .
' `a, t,.°
a.
. ~ ~ \ I ~ ~ cxneluc scet,s ,
~ R . If ).9? T 'f
I ~ l .19.90' ~ ~ rt_ ~
S M']]'])' Y 1 ~ R) ~
• .s ale -,r?-r a
\
`a~
` ~
~1 ~ - .
\ ~G't' .'.1.,
~ '
a5 'Johnson, Kunkel
gyp,
& Associates, lnc. ;
. - _ uari su¢varmo r~rrs`o' avs. v..,-..':
use v~ oema+ .
~]xe-sue wo-wla xe)-oeu
~ . ~ •ra 1. w ,fa ,.r + Rwr un. ~r 1fu,
. ~ - q,". S ~ SCOTT ~ as OCT. 16, 1990 -
A
1
Y \
y,~~
,1~
TOWN OF VAIL ~
7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Public works/Transportation
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2166
MENSORANDiJM
T0: Town Council
FROM: Public Works/Transportation Department
DATE: February 21, 1992
RE: Acquisition of Rights to a
Drainage Easement in West Vail
The Town of Vail was contacted by Kent Rose, owner of Lot 10
Block C Vail Ridge Subdivision, regarding the presence of a storm
sewer on his property - without the Town having any recorded
rights for such a use. He has asked the Town to secure rights to
use a portion of the property for drainage purposes by obtaining
a drainage easement from him.
The owner is asking. :•that; the:.building permit-.fees be waived for • ~
the construction of his house iii exchange for the granting"of a
drainage easement to the Town. The Community Development
Department estimates the building fees to be in the range of
$4,000.00.
The Town staff has investigated the situation and it appears the
Town, indeed, has no recorded right to use any portion of his
property for drainage purposes. The staff agrees with the owner
that the rights to use the property need to be secured. It
should be noted, however, that the sewer pipe is buried in an
existing utility easement and does not "take up" any additional
property.
The storm sewer pipe actually crosses four properties between
Davos Trail and Arosa Drive. The storm sewer pipe was installed
during the 1987 street project in West Vail and although it
appears Town staff received verbal permission from the owner to
install the pipe, no legal rights to use the property for
drainage purposes were secured. The Town, therefore needs to
obtain drainage easements from all four property owners involved
to clear up the issue entirely.
Memorandum to Town Council
February 21, 1992
Page 2
The Public Work's Department philosophy with past street projects
has been to obtain drainage easements through grants of easement
or determine whether or not if the Town has "prescriptive rights
by use" to the land in question. The reasoning behind the
approach is the Town is paying 100 of the cost of improvements
in the neighborhoods and any easements necessary to complete
these improvements should be the neighborhood contribution.
In the Booth Creek Road project, ten drainage easements were
dedicated at a cost to the Town by fourteen different owners -
saving the Town saved around $40.000.00. The Public works
Department has up to this point, obtained all the drainage
easements associated with their projects, however, if an owner
had refused to grant an easement, we are obligated to provide for
compensation for the loss of value to the owner due to the
imposition of the easement.
The options in regards to the West Vail property owners are as
follows: ,
o Explain the Town's position relating to street improvements
and ask the property owners~to grant the easements. Argue
that a storm sewer completely underground is in essence a
utility. The pipe then is allowed to exist in the utility
easement which is intended for such uses.
o Investigate the potential of the Town having a claim to
prescriptive rights by use, as a drainage culvert existed in
the location and directed flows along these properties since
the subdivision roads were in place. Securing rights to
property by prescriptive rights, however, is no simple or
inexpensive method as the courts make the final decision.
o Obtain a short form appraisal to determine the fair market
value for compensation of the loss of value to the property
owners and proceed with negotiations to acquire the
easements based on the appraisals. It would appear the full
cost of this appraisal process is in the $5,000.00 -
$7,000.00 range.
If the property owners determine that a short form appraisal is
the desired solution, the Town's options would be:
o Counter offer the request with a value of compensation the
staff feels is more in line with the easements in question
(Total cost $3,000.00 - $5,000.00). The concern here is it
may be perceived the Town staff is biased and
unknowledgeable in the area of property appraisal costs.
T
Memorandum to Town Council
February 21, 1992
Page 3
o Agree to the request of the property owner and waive the
building fees and determine a value to compensate the
remaining property owners for the easements acquired. It
would appear that this would cost the Town approximately
58,400.00. In-kind services, improvements, waiving of fees,
use of other lands rent free and so forth all add up to the
value of consideration and should not be looked at as any
less during negotiations, even though the costs may not be
as real. .
It is the staff's desire to obtain direction on which way to
proceed as the requesting owner is in the process of submitting
for a building permit and one of the big questions is will the
fees be waived. It is the staff's recommendation to the Council .
that the Town secure the property rights for a drainage easement
from the impacted homeowners at a fair or equitable price.
GH/dsr
GHTCAOR.221
"
_ EXHIBIT A "
• ScC. 62.1005 L~(IFOIL41 tiEWSR.~CXS REQLIRED AT C.S.RTAL'I LOCATIONS
(a) ine clutter and con3estion of numerous disparate types of .^.ewsneks at certain locations
in the pufllic rights of •.vay is detrimental to the public safe:y, conve:uenee and general wei-
far~. Accordingly, the public interest requires chat ncvvsrack faclitics of uniiarm and ca•
ordinated const;uc*_ion and appeanrtce be utilized at such !Deacons. '
(bl ine City Mana3e- shall implement this poiic~ by de;cr^..ining, horn tirnc to tirae,~ "
which locations require any suc'z fac~ities and by de:e-raining the standards for suet farlicies
'at each suet loescion.
(c) The City Manas;e; shall make suet detezaiinations fat each such location only after
holding a public lsearng on the subKct ac which al! persons interested shall be giveW a
reasonabic opoor:unity to be heard. T'hc City J~tartage; inall conduct. a public hearing when
it is brought to his at:e.^.tion by his own investigations, a tnrnber of the City Councl, •
newspaper disc-:bator, dvic organization, citizcas, of •by any oche means, that c:-tsin to-
caciors might require unifor;W newsnck far:Iities. Notice of suca public hcarzg shall be
given to each person reasonably known to him to be maintaining a newsraek or newsrseks
wit5in the public right of way, and to each person who has requested, in writing, that a public
hearing be held.
(d) In de:c.:..tnirg whlc:s IDeations, if any, require unifora newsrscY faclitics, the C<ry
Manage- shall make the following findings: (I) the location concairs four or more news-
racks wtthL'I a space of fifty (50) feet; (2) the location. is an area extensively used by the
general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian traffic; and (3) such unifot~-i newsnck
faclitics arc feasible at that Iocarion. '
(e) In detc;-nining the types of uniform We•xsrack faclitics :o be required at cash such
locatio^., the City Manage; shall apply the following ,7uidelincs:
(I) ice newsnck faclitics shall be located so as to tnaxi~ ire the public conve:sienee
and safety, both as to accessibility co the newsrack~ and the use of the public right of way
as a thorous~tfare, and the aest`setie appearance of the area. •
(2) The type and appearance, including colors, of the newsnck faclitics shall blend
with the surroundings of t`tc particviar location to the extent prac~cable.
(4) ine most economical types of newsrack Facclitics :hail be selected, coruistent with
the ends to be achieved. o
(4) .absolute uniformity in size and connguntion shall not necessarly be required.
For example, larger or multiple newsnck: may be pe-Witted fer bulky or Erequcadv issued
publications and smalIcr units may be permitted for smaller publications or publieatioas
with greater intervals of issuance.
(5) Standards shall be specified so as to per-tit a reasonably wide selet::ion of newsraek
faclitics available on the market. Manufac^sre:s shall not be specified by nar.:e unless
equivalr..ts are also pet-Witted, not shall the standards be so na.:owly dawn as co restrict
the scle.on to only Drat proprietary brand.
(f)-The City Manage: shall reduce his findings to writing and shall give written notice
thereof co the persons referred to in subsection (e) of this section prior to their implementation.
(g) the City shall, at its czpcrssc, furnish. install and maintain the common supporting
c__ „_,,.r,~4. Th~ ~i;.rributon of eacz: oublicarion shall, at their
expense, filrrtish, install and maintain the individual newsrack uni;s. Except u appii<d by the
City Mana3e:, t`sc provisions of Sccnon 62..1005 shall not anpiy to newsraeks installed and
R,,;ntained pursuant to tiffs se^.ion. Subject to the foregoing, and except as otherwise deter- -
mined-oy the CICy 1~tarLi;e;, the provisions of this division shall apply fully to newsrack facilit-
ies iastailcd pursuant to phis section.
{h} .3ft~ the City Manager has made said dete.:..inations, and acre: the Ciry has installed
cane s::; por:i: 3 st^.:c..::cs or •re loeaaon is o4`ter.~ise ready for ::.t individual newsnck units
to be irs:ailcd, no arson shall place, install. _,.i:ttain any newsraek ac that location •
except. in confor;aarce with the standards preseibed tFice:ar by. the City JQanager.
"Location" u used in the foregoing sentenec shall mean any place within one hundred fifty
(150) feet of •thc-p[acc designated far the installation of said urifortn newsnck: urilcss it is
separated t'tcrefzom by a steer or a sidewalk corns. Nothing hc:cirr contained than be con-
• :trued co prevent a disc: cuter Eton: using a nonconforming newsnck during the period that
(1) an adequate supporting sr;'treturc is not available.; or I:c.c~rrot obtain a conforming
newsnck unit because one is not availa:olc; or (3) his unit is urdc:going, needed cuiacnance
• or rep:i-s and a replaccmcnt is not rc:,sorubly av:i'.a'cle; or (4)`.: s diligcaL/ prc_cd?r:3 :o
replace a unit; or (5) an eme;geWCy exisu during whicz he would otae:xise he preve:ttcd from
distributing his publications by meatLS of a newsrack ac that loc:con, provided that he acts
diligent;y to correct the situ=won.
(i) ine relative location of individual newsrack units shall ~c dcternined and may be
rotated C:om titre to ti.^.c by agreement among t'1c discibutors. Should they be unable to
agree, c^.e City Muiager shall annually determine the relative locsco^. `oy lot.
(Added 12~-74 by Ord. 1i45i ;iS.)
EXHIBIT B
Sec. 20-'4. Standards for t.'^.e Installation and ~isti~-
teaanct of eWsracks in The Golden 4iall Area.
News:acSa i, s°..aller cn p+:biie Rideaalk3, Dazs-~+ays aid
a:: eeu is t,::t a: en kaow:: as The Golden h;a?':, as suc u:a
is cesc=bed a:.d del:aesuc in Sac:icn 1 c' Ordinance No.
20E1, passer a.^^ sdcptec cn Ap::14, I~~, ~~rst be of aty~
ecrivale:~t to :Kodel 100 K•Jack Tiewapape.° Rsc~ with
si".gie peces:al mot:.°:t eq~.:i~alen: to K-Jac~ Slagle Pedestal
Mo::-.t ~:ocel 100, or such ot:.e: Wo~:.^.:;ng ce~:ces as may be
approved by ::.e Public R%c:~ Dirzc;,c:, Wair:tained at all
ties it gccd ozcez ayd repa~.° anc :.^s;as`eC only in the
a:a:::ser a:.d at.evc1: Iocstr~or9 wit: r Z"he Gcicen Mal' a.*ea
as approver by L~:e Fark! a:.d ~ eceation D:: ector; provided, .
however, that rews:acics Pot CO .fOP~ 1:'.~ °„o SuG'1 6ta.":CSI~B
A+hic. h are is ue on Oc:.ober 1, 197E, may be mainuiaed aL
the places where *.hey a°e z.~:en locstec tr.tii Oc~be: 1, .979,
u:,less sooner :emovec' oz the time fo: ca~pliaacz is
exre::drd i.-~ individual cases fcz a period not esceeding sir
(6) oa.~s if Lie Counc? deter~.ires f:cw info ~stioa
aub~ittsd L~1at l:a.•dahip would of er~zse result
. (A~e:~ded by Ord. Ne. 26?5, a 10/29~^i8.
I
EXHIBIT C
4-11-7 Newspaper Vending ~'Iachines. 4-I1-8 Application Procedures.
(a) A newspaper vending machine may be (a) The mall commission shall review each
installed only at the specific locations and in application for a permit or lease in accord-
the manner for which such installation has ance wit:: the purposes and requirements of
been provided as part of the mall construe- this cha?ter and recommend to the city man-
tion. alter approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application.
(b) A newspaper vending machine is available
to any publication that meets the standards ~ (b) The city: manager, after receiving a recom-
for asecond class mailing permit, on a first- mendation from the mall commission as pro-
come, first-served. basis, upon payment of a ~ vided in subsection (a) of this section, shall
one-time fee to recover the then current cost determine whether each application for a
of the machine. permit or lease meets the purposes and
requirements of this chapter and approve or
(c) A newspaper or publishing firm using a disappro~-e the application.
newspaper vending. machine on the mall
shall maintain the. machine. The city will (c) .The city- manager may adopt rules and regu-
assess acharge for any maintenance that ~ lations establishing the process for accept-
must be performed when a user has failed to ~ ing, re~•iewing, and approving all permit
correct a maintenance problem within silty and lease applications- submitted pursuant
days of notice thereof by the city. to this chapter, including the contents of
such applications and the specific criteria
(d) A newspaper vending machine permit that will be considered in the review process.
expires when the machine is not in use fora Each applicant shall comply with' such
period of sixty days. requirements. =
(d) Each a?oiicant for a permit or lease shall
obtain all required building, health, or oiher
permits or Iicenses from all applicable gov-
ernment departments.
(e) The per^ittee shall prominently display the
permit. .
(fl Whene~-er any permittee desires to change
. .the use or the location of the activity autho- '
rized b~- the permit, the permittee shall fol- .
low the review and approval process
required of a new applicant.
' i
4i=:
EXHIBIT D
_ DRAFT
10/89
NIMLO'S MODEL NEWSRACK ORDINANCE
TABLE .OF CONTENTS
SECTION 10-1201. Intent and Purpose
SECTION 10-1202. Definitions
SECTION 10-12,03. Permit Required
SECTION 10-1204. Application for Permit
SECTION 10-1205. Conditions for Permit
SECTION 10-1206. Standards for Maintenance and Installation
SECTION 10-1207 Display of Obscene Material
SECTION 10-1208. Location and Placement of Newsracks
SECTION 10-1209. Violations of Ordinance
SECTION 10-1210:. Appeals
SECTION 10-1211. City Manager's Designated Representative
SECTION 10-1212. Abandonment
SECTION 10-1213. Separability
SECTION 10-1214. Effective Date
- 3 - ~
I
_ ~
NIMLO MODEL ORDINANCE ON NEWSRACKS
Section 10-1201. Intent and Purpose.
The City Council of the City of finds and
declares that:
(a) The uncontrolled placement 'of newsracks in public
rights-of-way presents an inconvenience and danger to the
safety and welfare of persons using such rights of way,
including pedestrians, persons entering and leaving vehicles
and buildings, and persons performing essential utility,
traffic control and emergency services. '
(b) Newsracks so located as to cause an inconvenience
or danger to persons using public rights-of-way, and
unsightly newsracks located therein, constitute public
nuisances.
(c) It is a matter of public necessity that the City of
protect children and unconsenting adults
in and on its public streets, sidewalks, transportation
facilities and other public rights-of-way from viewing such
public displays of offensive sexual material. Such displays
are thrust indiscriminately upon unwilling audiences of
adults and children and constitute assaults upon individual
privacy.
' (d) The provisions and prohibitions hereinafter
contained and enacted are in pursuance of .and for the purpose
of securing and promoting the public health, morals, and
general welfare of persons in the City of
in their use of public rights-of-way..
Section 10-1202. Definitions.
(a) Distributor shall mean the person responsible for
placing and maintaining a newsrack in a public right-of-way.
(b) Newsrack means any self-service or coin-operated
box, container, storage unit or other dispenser installed,
used, or maintained for the display and sale of newspapers or
other news periodicals.
(c) Parkway means that area between the sidewalks and
the curb of any street, and where there is no
sidewalk that area between the edge of the roadway
and property line adjacent thereto. Parkway shall
also include any area within a roadway that is not open
~to vehicular travel.
(d) Roadway means that portion of a street improved, designed, or
ordinarily used for vehicular travel.
- 4 -
(e) Sidewalk means all that area dedicated to public use for
public street purposes and shall include, but not be limited
to, roadways, parkways, alleys and sidewalks.
(f) Pictorial Material means any material suggesting or conveying
a visual image, and includes, but is not limited to, a
photograph, painting or drawing.
(g) Any pictorial material is "obscene" if all of the following
apply:
1) The average person, applying contemporary community
standards, would find that it appeals to the prurient
interest when the publication or material is considered as a
whole; and
2) It depicts, describes or represents. in a patently
offensive manner, sexual behavior as defined in Section
10.-1202 (h); and
3) It lacks serious literary, artistic,
political or scientific value when the
publication or material is considered as a whole.
(h) Sexual behavior means the patently offensive representation,
depiction or description of any of the following:
1) Ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted,
actual or simulated, including without limitation,
vaginal intercourse between a male and a female,
and anal intercourse, fellatio and
cunnilingus between persons regardless of sex.-
2) Masturbation, excretory functions and lewd
exhibition of the genitals.
3) The actual or simulated infliction of pain
by one individual upon another, or by an individual
upon-himself, for the purpose of the sexual .
gratification or release of either individual, as a
result of flagellation, beating, striking or
touching of an erogenous zone, including without
limitation the thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic
rey'_en, or, if such person is a female, a breast.
. 4) Ultimate sexual acts, actual or simulated,
between a human being and an animal.
Section 10-1203. Permit Required..
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect,
place, maintain or operate, on any public street or sidewalk, or in any
other public way or place, in the City of _ any
newsrack without first having obtained a permit from the {City
- 5 -
e
• \
.y
Manager} specifying the exact location of such rack(s). One permit may
be issued to include any number of newsrack., and shall be signed by the
applicant.
Section 10-1204. Application for Permit.
Application for such permit shall be made, in writing, to the
{City Manager} upon such form as shall be provided by him, and shall
contain the name and address of the applicant, the proposed specific
location of said newsrack, and shall be signed by the applicant.
Section 10-1205. Conditions for Permit.
(a) As an express condition of the acceptance of such permit, the
permittee thereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, directors, and employees against any loss
or liability or damage, including expenses and costs for
bodily or personal injury,, and for property damage sustained
by any person as the result of the installation, use, or
maintenance of a newsrack within the City of
(b) Permits shall be issued for the installation of a newsrack or
newsracks without prior inspection of the location but such
. newsrack or newsracks and the installation, use or
maintenance thereof shall be conditioned upon observance of
the provisions of this Ordinance. Permits shall be issued
within twenty-four (24) hours (excluding Saturday and Sunday
and legal holidays after the application has been filed. A
permit fee of $ is required.
(c) Such permits shall be valid for three years and shall be~~
renewable pursuant to the procedure for original applications
referred to in~Section 10-1204 and upon payment of the
$ permit fee.
(d) Stickers showing the permit number shall be issued with the .
permit and must be displayed on the front of each newsrack at
all times.
Section 10-1206. Standards for Maintenance and
Installation.
Any newsrack which in whole or in part rests upon; in or over any
public sidewalk or parkway, shall comply with the following standards:
(a) No newsrack shall exceed five (5) feet in height, thirty (30)
inches in width, or two (2) feet in thickness.
(b) No newsrack shall be used for advertising signs or publicity
purposes other than. that dealing with the display, sale, or ~
purchase of the newspaper or news periodical sold therein.
' ~ - 6 - i
I
(c) Each newsrack shall be equipped with a coin-return mechanism
to permit a person using the machine to secure an immediate
refund in the event he is unable to receive the publication
paid for. The coin-return mechanisms shall be maintained in
good working order.
(d) Each newsrack shall have affixed to it in a readily visible
place so as to be seen by anyone using the newsrack a notice
setting forth the name and address of the distributor and the
telephone number of a working telephone service to call to
report a malfunction, or to secure a refund in the event of a
malfunction of the coin-return mechanism, or to give the
notices provided for in this ordinance.
(e) Each newsrack shall be maintained in a neat and clean
condition and in good repair at all times. Specifically, but
without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each
newsrack shall be serviced and maintained so that:
1) It is reasonably free of dirt and grease.
2) It is reasonably free of chipped, faded,
peeling and cracked paint in the visible painted .
areas thereof.
3) It is reasonably free .of rust and corrosion in
the visible unpainted metal areas thereon.
4) The clear plastic or glass parts thereof, if
any, through which the publications therein are
viewed are unbroken and reasonably free of cracks,
dents, blemishes and discoloration.
5) The paper or cardboard parts. or inserts
thereof are reasonably free of tears, peeling or
fading.
6) The structural parts thereof are not
broken or unduly misshapen.
Section 10-1207. Display of Obscene Material.
It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly place or maintain
any publication or material in newsracks which exposes to public view
any pictorial material that is obscene.
Section 10-1208. Location and Placement of Newsrack.
Any newsrack which rests in whole or in part upon, or on any
portion of a public right-of-way or which projects onto, into, or over
any part of a public right-of-way shall be located in accordance with
the provisions of this Section:
(a) No newsrack shall be used or maintained which
- 7 -
projects onto, into, or over any part of the
roadway of any public street, or which rests,
wholly or in part upon, along, or over any portion
of the roadway of any public street.
(b} No newsrack shall be chained, bolted, or
otherwise attached to any fixture located in the
public right-of-way, except to other newsracks.
(c) Newsracks may be placed next to each other,
provided that no group of newsracks shall extend
for a distance of more than eight (8) feet along a
curb, and a space of not less than three (3) feet
shall separate each group of newsracks.
(d)~ No newsrack shall be placed, installed, used or maintained:
1) Within three (3) feet of any marked crosswalk.
2) Within twelve (12) feet of the curb return of any
unmarked crosswalk.
3) Within five {5) feet of any fire hydrant, fire call box,
police call box or other emergency facility..
4) - Within five (5) feet of any driveT.~ay.
5) Within three (3) feet ahead or fifteen (15) feet to the
rear of any sign marking a designated bus stop.
6) Within three .(3) feet of the outer end of ariy bus bench.
7} At any location whereby the clear space for the
passageway of pedestrians is reduced to less than six (6}
feet.
8) Within three (3) feet of or on any public area improved
with lawn, flowers, shrubs., trees or other landscaping. .
9) Within one hundred (100) feet of any other newsrack on _
the same side of the street in .the same block containing the .
same issue or edition of the same publication.
10) On any handicap access ramp.
The provisions contained in Subsection (d)(5) of this Section
shall not apply if compliance with the provisions would prohibit
the placement of a newsrack for a distance of one hundred fifty
(150) feet on the same side of the street in the same block.
Section 10-1209. Violations of Ordinance.
Upon determination by the {City Manager} that a newsrack has been
installed, used or maintained in violation of the provisions of this
- 8 - I
ordinance, an order to correct the offending condition will be issued
to the distributor of the newsrack. Such order shall be telephoned to
the distributor and confirmed by mailing a copy of the order by
certified mail return receipt requested. The order shall specifically
describe the offending condition, suggest actions necessary to correct
the condition, and inform the newsrack distributor of the right. to
appeal. Failure to properly correct the offending condition within
five (5) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after
the mailing date of the order or to appeal the order within three (3)
days after its receipt shall result in the offending newsrack being
summarily removed and processed as unclaimed property. If the
offending newsrack is not properly identified as to owner under
provisions of Section 10-1206(d) hereof, it shall be removed
immediately and processed as unclaimed property. An impound fee, which
shall be measured by the City's cost and expense of impounding, shall
be assessed against each newsrack summarily removed. The {City
Manager} shall cause inspection to be made of the corrected condition
or of a ne*asrack reinstalled after removal under this Section. The
distributor of said newsrack shall be charged a {$10.00} inspection fee
for each newsrack so inspected. This charge shall be in additior. to all
other fees and charges required under this Ordinance.
Section 10-1210. Appeals.
Any person or entity aggrieved by a finding, determination,
notice, order or action taken under the provisions of this Ordinance
may appeal and shall be appraised of his right to appeal to the {Appeal
Board}. An appeal must be perfected within three (3) days after
receipt of notice of any protested decision or action by filing with
the office of the a.letter of appeal
briefly stating therein the basis for such appeal. A hearing shall be
held on a date no more than ten (10) days after receipt of the letter
of appeal. Appellant shall be given at least five (5) days notice of
the time and place of the hearing. The {Appeal Board} shall give the
appellant, and any other interested party, a reasonable opportunity to
be heard, in order to show cause why the determination of the {City
Manager} should not be upheld. At the conclusion of the hearing, the
{Appeal Board} shall make a final and conclusive decision. This
decision shall be immediately appealable to a court of competent
jurisdiction.
Section 10-1211. City Manager's Designated Representative.
{"City Manager"} as used in this Ordinance shall include his
designated representative.
Section 10-1212. Abandonment.
In the event a newsrack remains empty for a period of thirty (30)
continuous days, the same shall be deemed abandoned, and may be
treated it the manner as provided in Section 10-1209 for newsracks in
violation of the provisions of this Ordinance.
- 9 -
~ ~ t
' ~
" i
Section 10-1213. -Separability. .
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid .or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance.
Section 10-1214. Effective Date.
This Ordinance -shall be effective thirty (30) days after its
publication.
Please send comments on this draft ordinance to:
Newsrack Editor •
NIMLO '
' 1000 Connecticut Ave., NW ~
Suite 902
Washington, DC 20036 .
M
r
- 10 - -
i~~
h/, i ~ ~ r~} 11 x'1}7
~-i
~1 . U ~ t ~
~ ~ , ~ .
-
S ~
. a~d _ . ,
. ,;~.~,.s
,x
,1ff
i 4. Wo'k' ~ n.f . ' 1
Y' '
~~C'D F Ed 2 4 1992
~ COMPANY
('oU,l/~/L ~
February 20, 1992
2 a~/
~~~e~Y
5 i ~v~ Q
Mr. Ron Phillips
Town Manager
Town o f Va i 1 C'fl~dGi~/ ~
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657 /
J ,3,9~/ 3
Dear Ron : s ~P ea?
Enclosed is the summary report from the Goal-Setting Workshop
conducted on February 18,
I suggest that you distribute this report to Council as appropriate
and schedule follow-up sessions with Council and the Administrative
Staff to develop a final list of goals for the Town of Vail and
subsequent implementation strategies. It is important that the
goals be officially adopted and widely disseminated throughout the
community. It is equally important that specific implementation
plans be developed for the systematic achievement of each goal.
This is especially true given the profound strategic nature of some
of the goals which will require extensive negotiations toward new
governance arrangements, expanding resource availability, and the
garnering of public enthusiasm and support for the commitments
necessary for achieving the proposed Town of Vail goals.
In a recent telephone conversation with Pam, I proposed that a
forum be established in the near future at which the Eagle County
Commissioners and the Councils of Vail and Avon can share their
respective goals toward establishing shared objectives and
commitments. It seems to me, based upon my knowledge of your
.proposed goals and those of Eagle County, that some significant
'breakthroughs can be achieved rather quickly that would establish
a whole new consciousness about leadership for the future of the i
entire Gore Valley and Eagle County areas.
If I may be of assistance to you in completing the follow-up steps,
please do not hesitate to contact me. Also, if you would like to
discuss some of these ideas via telephone, please call me at 986-~
8487,
? Pro-Med Management Division
? Government Leadership Division
? General Management Systems Division ,
8169 West Baker Avenue Lakewood, Colorado 80227 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 36308 Lakewood, Colorado 80236 Telephone:303/986-8487
Mr, Ron Phillips
February 20, 1992
Page -2-
It was a pleasure having the opportunity to work with you, the Town
Council, and the outstanding Administrative Staff of the Town of
Vail.
Sincerely
r
Carl H. Neu, Jr.
CHN:amb
Enclosure
P,S, Ron, I forgot to mention in the report that I think that the
number of goals should not exceed 8 to 10 for the Town of
Vail, Therefore, out of the list of 21 proposed goals, the
final list should be boiled down to 8 to 10 goals to which the
Town of Vail Council is willing to make an asserted commitment
for their attainment.
~S COMPANY REC'~ FE8 2 4 ~gg2
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO
SUIyII~iARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
TOWN COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATION
GOAL-SETTING WORKSHOP
CONDUCTED ON
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
S[JMMARY PREPARED BY
CARL NEU
NEU & COMPANY
LAKEWOOD, COLORADO
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
? Pro-Med Management Division
? Government Leadership Division
? General Management Systems Division
8169 West Baker Avenue Lakewood, Colorado 80227 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 36308 Lakewood, Colorado 80236 Telephone:303/986-8487
TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO
SUMMARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
TOWN COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATION
GOAL-SETTING WORKSHOP
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 18, 1992, the Town Council and key members of the
Administrative Staff participated in a Goal-Setting Workshop
as a sequel to the Council - Manager Team-Building Workshop
conducted on January 28. The purpose of this workshop was to
establish a preliminary set of proposed goals that would guide
Council and Administration priorities and activities for the
next three- to five-year period.
II. KEY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Exploration of Visions for Vail in the Year 2000 and
Beyond
1. The visioning process
Any strategic planning process which-eventually
leads to definition of goals and implementation
work plans usually starts with clarifying a common
vision held by the involved parties as to what
future outcomes should be for their organization.
In the case of a community such as Vail, this
process involves asking the participants to envi-
sion their community at a given time; in this case,
the year 2000 or beyond.
Each of the participants from the Town Council and
Administrative Staff were involved in defining as -
graphically as possible their respective visions
for the future of Vail in terms of what the commu-
. nity would be like in character, makeup, physical
attributes, population density, economic base, etc.
The purpose of these vision drawings was to permit
a sharing of individual perspectives as the basis
for defining common elements which could be framed
. into performance goals and implementation plans.
2. Elements common to the vision drawings
The following elements were common to a majority of
the vision drawings presented by the participants:
a, Extensive landscaping throughout the communi-
ty.
b, An emphasis on high-quality recreation.
c. Establishment of a "common" Valley government.
d, Stabilizing the local population,
e. Availability of affordable housing and employ-
ee housing.
f. Stream walk and recreation paths.
g. Mass transit.
h. No cars (cars are invisible within Vail) -
truck loading.
i. More public land (dedication of land for
public use),
j. Emphasis on year-around activities so that
tourist capacity could be used fully through-
out the year.
k. Connecting of the ski areas; i,e., Beaver
Creek, Vail, Copper Mountain, etc.
1. Clean air and management of the factors af-
fecting air quality,
m.. Recycling.
n. Need for minor redevelopment to occur in
certain parts of the community.
o. Conference and Community Center.
p. Quality guest services (quality demonstrated
through behavior and attitudes of people).
q. Establishing a 24-hour Information Center.
r. Cleanliness of the entire community,
s. Streetscaping with particular emphasis on I-
70.
t, Cemetery.
2
u. Population of the Town of Vail to be approxi-
mately 4,000 to 4,500; population of the
extended Vail area may reach as high as
• 25,000.
v. Diversification of the economy by bringing in
clean industry, think-tanks, etc.
w. Public art.
x. Environmental consciousness and preservation
of the environmental heritage of the area
(balancing environmental concerns with the
benefits of development). •
3. Critical strategic factors which must be addressed-
/managed
The process of strategic leadership thinking re-
quires the development of an understanding of those
fundamental strategic factors which are the "desti-
ny shapers" of the community and which must be
managed or influenced by the community if it is to
achieve its envisioned future. Quite frequently,
the typical decision-making processes used within a
community tend not to get at these fundamental
factors to the degree necessary to truly guide the
destiny of a community toward its desired future.
Some of the fundamental key strategic factors
identified by the group include:
a. Control of land for public uses and future
development.
b. Control of future housing development.
c. Keeping the "locals" in the Valley.
d. Control of fundamental transportation issues •
necessary for establishment of mass transit,
etc.
e. Gaining support among the public through
developing consensus and collaboration of
public and political bodies that will bring
about a form of government necessary to guide
the future of the entire Vail Valley.
f. Availability of funding and other resources
essential to achievement of community goals.
3
g. The active participation and support of Vail
Associates and utilities.
h, Establishing public/private/community partner-
ships.
i, Developing mechanisms that will bring about a
consolidation of regional services in areas
such as public works, fire, police, libraries,
while still preserving the unique identities
and elements of each of the communities.
j. Commitment to a future-oriented thinking and
e leadership that will permit more aggressive
programs in housing, public land purchases,
transportation, developing a year-around
economy, environmental issues, recreation,
aesthetics, pedestrian amenities, and land-
scape improvements.
k. Willingness to incur debt to achieve benefits
essential to the future.
1. Nurturing a good relationship with federal and
state highway departments for achieving the
streetscaping of I-70,
B. Froposed Goals for the Town of Vail
Based upon the discussions described above, the following
goals were proposed for the Town of Vail. Once the goals
were proposed, each of the participants was given an
opportunity to identify his/her "top six" high-priority
goals. Listed after each goal in parenthesis is the
number of Councilmembers and the number of Administrative
Staff members who identified the goal as one of his/her
"top six" high-priority goals.
The proposed goals are:
1. Investigate mechanisms and initiate within two
years a Valley-wide approach to providing services
under one umbrella organization to solve common
problems; avoid duplication, and improve the value
delivered for tax dollars spent. (Councilmembers -
5; Administrative Staff - 10)
2. Acquire land as required for future employee hous-
ing, transportation needs, open space requirements,
and other public purposes. (Councilmembers - 5;
Administrative Staff - 12)
4
3. Increase the greening of Gore Valley by planting
trees, shrubs, and flowers with a special emphasis
on the I-70 Corridor. (Councilmembers - 4; Admin-
istrative Staff - 12
4. Keep Vail Associates locally owned and operated.
(Councilmembers - 4; Administrative Staff - 1)
5. Build Town of Vail employee housing at Buzzard
Park. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff -
1)
6. Construct a Performance Art and Conference Center
as a Valley-wide joint venture within the next four
years. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff -
10)
7. Facilitate construction of 100-300 units of local
housing within the Gore Valley within the next five
years - 50 to 75 units to be built within the next
year. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff -
5)
8. Become a leader among communities by implementing
an environmental strategic plan to address air
quality, water quality, recycling, and chemical
use. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff -
4)
9. Provide land, joint financing, .and a positive
atmosphere for employer controlled housing that
will always be owned by the Town of Vail and built
by the private sector. (Councilmembers - 3; Admin-
istrative Staff - 0)
10. Create a special Tourist District within the next
two years within Eagle County and establish a
business license fee for the purpose of funding
marketing. (Councilmembers - 2; Administrative
Staff - 1)
11. Implement a Village and Lionshead delivery plan
which is as near vehicle free as possible. (Coun-
cilmembers - 2; Administrative,Staff - 2)
12. Implement continuing quality improvement programs
for all Town of Vail systems; i.e., the Deming
approach. (Councilmembers - 1; Administrative
Staff - 2)
13. Improve and expand guest services and economic base
with increased commitment to quality and Town of
S
Vail and private sector projects, including mainte-
nance. (Councilmembers - 1; Administrative Staff -
2)
14. Complete Valley-wide biking, walking, and country
trail systems over the next five years. (Council-
members - 1; Administrative Staff - 7)
15. Enlarge Town of Vail revenues without increasing
taxes by controlling Gore Valley utilities, includ-
ing the ski mountain. (Councilmembers - 1; Admin-
istrative Staff - 0)
16. Develop a master plan for the redevelopment of
Lionshead to take place over the next three years.
(Councilmembers - 1; Administrative Staff - 0)
17. Enlist public and private funding cooperation for
achievement of Town of Vail goals. (Councilmembers
- 0; Administrative Staff - 2)
18. Increase areas for pedestrian and enhance existing
pedestrian areas. (Councilmembers - 0; Administra-
tive Staff - 1)
19'. Complete financing/implementation schedule and
initiate at least one improvement in each of the
following program areas within the next three
years:
m Transportation
W Streetscaping
m Environmental policy
(Councilmembers.- 0; Administrative Staff - 6)
20. Work toward the creation of a year all-around
economy. (Councilmembers - 0; Administrative Staff
- 9)
21. Ensure that guests can comfortably and economically
come to Vail and ensure that transportation within
EdvonaVail is simple. (Councilmembers - 0; Admin-
istrative Staff - 2)
Footnote: The following item was identified as a desired
implementation step for Goal No. 2: "Control 30 acres of
developable land over the next three years within the
Gore Valley."
6
It should be remembered that the list of goals outlined
above is preliminary in nature and subject to refinement,
consolidation, and rewording upon further consideration
by Council in dialogue with Staff.
III, NEXT STEPS
A. Preparing Final Goal Statements
It is recommended that the preliminary set of goals be
reviewed and refined into a final list of goals to be
adopted by the Town Council through Resolution. The
goals that should appear on that list should be those to
which the Town Council is committed over the next three-
to five-year period.
B.~ Developing Implementation Strategies, Revenue Policies,
and Management Action Plans (MAPS)
Listed on the next page is a flow chart of the goal-
setting process as it evolves from a vision statement
into specific annualized work plans and budgets, It is
recommended that for each goal, the following be estab-
lished:
1. A general statement of implementation strategies to
be followed in pursuit of achieving the goal.
2. A clear definition of resource/revenue policy that
will ensure adequate funding and resource avail-
ability to pursue the goal aggressively.
3. Definition of annualized performance objectives for
at least the next two- to three-year period which
will serve as the basis for annual departmental
work planning and budget preparation.
4. Clear assignment of responsibilities to individ-
uals/departments that will have primary oversight
for the achievement of the goal.
5. Establishment of evaluation criteria and appropri-
ate monitoring processes that will permit periodic
review of goal achievement status and assessment of
the outcomes achieved.
Contained in the last pages of the Participant
Workbook used at the .February 18 workshop are
examples of this process as implemented in the Town
of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota:
C. The goal list, once defined and adopted by Council,
should be publicized widely throughout the community as
the basis for ensuing dialogues between Council and other
leadership groups throughout the community and the entire
Gore Valley.
8
A l9UNICIPAL GOAL - SETTING PROCESS
There are a number of approaches to .conducting goal-setting
sessions for a community. A particular approach, that has proven
to be very popular, is designed to address the following key areas:
1. Definition of a strategic vision for the community
which serves as the basis for goal-setting and
performance-planning to be used by the governing
body and the administrative staff.
2. Identification of major "consensus points" held by
a majority of the governing body relative to its
vision for the future of the community.
3. Identification of critical issues and strategic
performance factors which are the "destiny shapers"
of the community. These critical issues and stra-
tegic performance factors generally represent areas
that must be addressed or managed by the governing
body and the city's executive team if the community
is to attain its vision for the future.
4. Defining specific outcomes that the council wishes
to achieve relative to each of the critical issues
and strategic performance factors. Once these
specific outcomes have been defined, a careful
identification needs to be made of all forces and
' factors working "for" and "against" attainment of
these critical outcomes by the governing body, the
city administration, and other leadership groups
within the community that can contribute to the
attainment of these specific outcomes.
5. Establishing specific performance goals that will _
lead to the attainment of the desired outcome and
- define general policies, leadership directions, and
performance priorities for the city.
6. Establishing revenue and resource allocation poli-
cies to ensure the continuous availability of the
necessary resources to achieve specific performance
goals established by_the council.
Assigning, if appropriate, specific responsibili-
ties that must exist within the council, between
council and the administrative staff, within the
administrative .staff, and between the city and
Y other significant leadership groups throughout the
community if each of the goals is to be achieved.
9.
8. Establishing for each goal a set of annualized
performance objectives and supporting Management
Action Plans (MAPS) designed .to ensure achievement
of community-wide goals in a systematic manner that
guides operating programs and priorities for the
council and administrative staff.
9. Establishing a goal-management and monitoring
process which permits the governing body and admin-
. istrative staff to have a comprehensive and coordi-
nated view of all of its strategic, tactical, and
operational efforts.
10. Identification of "breakthrough leadership targets"
which reflect significant issues that do not seem
to lend themselves to traditional decision-making
practices and administrative procedures. These
issues, frequently, are really ones that require
extraordinary insight and commitment for their
resolution, As such, these issues require whole
new levels of thinking and perspective which must
be integrated back into the goal-setting and MAP-
ping process.
ii. Conducting an initial assessment of the current
quality and extent of governing body-administrative
staff teamwork essential for goal achievement.
Frequently, a community will have an outstanding
set of goals and supporting objectives. However,.
difficulties may arise in the implementation phases
due to factors reflecting the level and quality-of
teamwork existing between groups that must work in
a collaborative manner.
12. Establishing communications processes through which
the critical issues, specific performance outcomes,
goals, and MAPS are communicated throughout the
community so that all leadership groups and citi-
zens have a full appreciation for the direction the
city is taking and the role they have in the a-
chievement of its goals.
i
10.
V
~VISION1
P
E MISSION $ ~LEADERSNIP / OPERATING PHILOSOPNY
R ~ ~ .L
S I KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES & CRITICAL OUTCOMES
I
P
. E (GOALS & STRATEGIES f
C ~
T ~ REVENUE / RESOURCE POLICIES
I ~ .
V MANAGEP•1ENT ACTION PLANS (MAPS)
I
~ i
E ~ ~ , t
S YEAR I YEAR 2 YEAR 3 ,YEAR I YEAR 5~
I 1
~I
( ANNUALIZED OPERATING PLANS & I3UDCETS, ETC,
1 FEEDBACK R~ EVALUATION PROCEDURES
TIME
il.
M
PLAN FORMAT
• 1. Issue
2. Background Information
3. Critical Outcome(s) That Are Desired
4. Specific Goals and Strategies to Be Used to Achieve Critical
Outcome(s)
5. Revenue/Resource Policies to- Support Outcome - Goal Attainment
6. Annualized Management Action Plans
a. Performance Objectives
b. Key Action Steps •
c. Staff Responsibility Charting (Assignments)
d. Budgets (Operating and Capital)
e. Evaluation Criteria •
f. Other Considerations
12.
_ ~ ~ ~J9Z
10HiVNETTE PFiILLIP~
P.O. BOX 537
CLEFK 3 FE~ORDER 500 6h0ADWAY
(303) 3?53710 ~YtOTOR VEMCLE °i ~ EAGLE. COLORADO 31 G3 I
(303) 323~S72o ELECTION ~
FAX (303) 3?3.7?O7
(303) 3?3.37?3 RECORDING •
>ii~
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
February 20, 1992
Mr. Rondall V. Phillips
Manager, Town of Vail
75 S Frontage Road
Vail, CO 81657
RE: Eagle County Polling Places
Dear Ron,
Thank you for your letter of concern regarding the Eagle
County polling places for the Vail precincts.
In response, as you know, we have always tried to accommodate
the voter, encouraging voter turn-out in all eighteen Eagle County
precincts and we endeavor to assure all elections run smoothly.
Pam and Georgie have been extremely helpful in the past in
assisting us and now Martha has acknowledged her appetency to help.
I want you to know we truly appreciate their support.
However, a press release was mailed to all County papers last
week reporting the Presidential Primary election for Eagle County
which included the location of the polling places. That
information has been printed, therefore, it is impossible to change
sites at this late date.
I spoke with Martha yesterday. We reviewed precinct boundary
maps and I gladly accepted her suggestion she help select the
polling place locations for the August 11, 1992 Primary election,
keeping in mind the State Statutes we must follow and the
convenience of the voters. Of course, availability for use of the
site is certainly a consideration. We value this important input
and are eager to find polling places that will be consistent•for
years to come.
We anticipate a light voter presence for the Presidential
Primary and hope the confusion of the voters will be minimal..
February 20, 1992
Page 2
The Town of Vail staff should not endure any harsh inquiries
from the electorate, but give them the Clerk and Recorder's
telephone number for us to defuse.
We appreciate the offer of the Town of Vail staff members
assistance and look forward to working with them again.
Sincerely
i~
Johnnette Phillips
Eagle County Clerk & Recorder
FJP/jh
cc: Vail Town Council
Pam Brandmyer, Assistant to Town Manager
Martha Raecker, Town of Vail Clerk
Fi EC,E, v~E~ F~ 3 2 3 192
t
~ 5TA1 ~ OF COLOI~~.DO
EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS ~p•cot
Xc : TC o
136 State Ca itol ~ 'P\
Denver, Colorado 80203-1792 cOrFrr y pfl
Phone (303) 866-2471 ^KE~
• ~2.1~ l/~l ~i
Roy Romer
Governor
•February 25, 1992
The Honorable Peggy Osterfoss
Mayor
• Town of Vail
75 S. Frontage Road:
Vail, CO 81658
Dear Mayor Osterfoss:
I was pleased to receive the enclosed letter from Kim
King. She referred to the February 14 chain reaction
accident on Vail Pass. She said that the Vail emergency
personnel did an outstanding job of securing people's
safety. She was impressed with their performance. I am
also. Please convey my thanks and commendations to all
• concerned.
I am proud that they are Coloradans and public employees. •
Sincerely, -
Roy mer
Governor
' cc: Ron Phillips? •
A
ruary 16, 19J2 '
The I-Ionorable Roy P.a:~er, Govenor ~~:e ~ Y ~
~ iJ
~~00 Last Eighth llvenue
Denver, Colorado GOVERNORS OFF(C~
EII ~ ~:0
Dear Govenor R.ccner
I am writing in reference to the chain reaction accident that occurred
February lath, 4~n on west bound Vail Pn.ss. I would like to recognize
the Grand Junction State Patrolman involved. :?is patrol car was totalled
and his partner suffered debiltating injuries. In spite of his injuries,
this Patrolman ran, with my husband, u~ the pass to warn oncaning traffic
of the danger. I-Ie controlled a very dangerous situation and prevented
a potential catastrophe; as cars and semis cresting the surrrnit had no
Wdi'illrlg Of blac:lC 1C@ C;OI1d1t117nS an:.I ti1C aCi:idciit. 'I'
here were nooplz, ~ '
cars and three semis scattered across the ~ti•est bound Lanes within five
minutes of the accident.
- ,
After Su~*mit County anti Vail energency personnel shou~eti, they also did
~ an outstanding job of securing; people's safety. They handled a very triclry
fuel spill preventing; a potential disaster 'f7 cm •hap~aiing. ~ Considering
the difficulty of energency vehicles arriving in a timely manner; these
people 1Cent injured and frightened accident victims safe and w~u~n in
their vehicles. '111e nrlss reonenc~cl after midni ;itt.
tY4y auestion to you is how this accident can b~~ avoided in the future?
I am a Denver native, business owner, and.American Airlines Flight
Attendant, trained to h'tncile emergency situations. Diy }husband, a Vail
Associates employee, and I carmute between Denver and Vail weekly.
I would hope that the Hi~hcvay Department assess more accurately the
potential for climate changes and road conditions. Out-of-State visitors
take 65P:I.P.H. as the rule when signage doesn't state otherwise. Rental
cars are what started this 30 car, three sea!.chain reaction accident.
_ Nlay we please use highway funds to sign warnings of conditional changes
s and can the Highway Department use better preventative measures to
a save lives, Cars and dollars spent orl accident recovo~; ? Additi:,nal~ly , -
let's rnake sure Rental Agencies equip their vehicles and out-of-state
- drivers :for Colorado's changing eveatller conditions.
'!'hank you for your consideration. Our families have lived in this state
. for several generations. This incident not ~vitlistanding, everything
you have done in your representation of us leas been great. Let's
continue to work together to keen it that way and don't hesitate to '
call on me if I can help in any tvay.
~ R,es_nectfull
y your ,
,
~11~~. Kits S. King e
L~'~~ 1059 South.Ga ord St. Den er, CO. 802pg 303-7?.2-2825
-~3 .
- .
r~~;~'
r
' _
9~ ~
' ~q
TOWN OF VAIL ~
75 South Frontage Road Department of Public Works/Transportation
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2166
MEMORANDOM
T0: Ken Hughey
FROM: Todd Oppenheimer
DATE: February 21, 1992
RE: Annuals versus Perennials
In the~,Town's flower planting program the annual versus perennial
argument i.s really more a matter of annual and perennial. We use
a combination of many species of flowers and groundcovers, both
annual and perennial, throughout Town. In Vail, some perennials
act as annuals and we even use some vegetables as annuals. There
have been some changes in the flower program since the 1990
season when I first arrived. We've increased the variety, sizes
and colors of flowers used, converted some annual beds to
perennials and converted some sod areas to groundcovers.
The decision to make a particular bed annuals or perennials is
usually subjective. I do, however, consider a couple less
subjective things when choosing the type of flowers to plant.
1. The location of the bed - High visibility beds where strong,
season-long color is desired will usually be annuals. Since
all perennials bloom at different times, its necessary to
plant a large mixture to achieve season long color. This
means at any given time most of the perennials will be in
foliage or seed and a few will be blooming. Annual flowers
are bred for long, intense periods of color. They can't be
beat where a strong statement is desired.
2. What happens to the bed in Winter - Winters in Vail are hard
on many species of perennials. This is compounded by large
quantities of ice and snow on a bed or by subjecting it to
heavy traffic. Compressed, frozen soil will kill almost any
root system. Flower beds that must accept this kind of
abuse are usually annuals. A good example here are the beds
at the four-way.
r. ,
Memorandum Regarding Annuals vesus Perennials
February 21, 1992
Page 2
On the subjective side, the use of annuals allows us to
change our beds from year to year. Abed which is red and
yellow one year, may be blue and white the next. I've
received many positive comments and a few complaints from
residents and guests about the Town's annual beds.
Most of our annual beds are in the commercial core areas
where the visibility is highest. Perennial beds can be
found in most of the parks, the golf course as well as in
the commercial areas.
We will continue to convert some perennial beds to annuals
where_it is practical to do so. Overall, our flower program
is successful and I wouldn't suggest any major changes.
Please let me know if I can provide additional information.
TO/dsr
R~v~sEd
~'n¢
ti
0 1992 ~ 1992 AMERICAN SRI CLASSIC
o ~ PRESENTED BY U S WEST '
¢ MARCH 2 - 8, 1992
u
c
cy~~ n a
RSpRY Monday, March 2
TENTH AN N1 7:00 P.M. The Challenge BC -Centennial .
VAIL & BEAVER CREEK 8:30 P.M. The Challenge Party BC -village Hall
• ABM( ERIQCccATc Tuesday, Harch 3
SKI 'mil 11.00 A. M. ROLEX Legends Downhill Vail International
Presenredby 1:00 P.M. Legends Downhill Awards Vail - Finish Stadium
Hosted by Jerry Ford Wednesday, March 4
SergioTacchiniSkiWorldCup 9:30 A. M. ROLEX Legends GS HC - Centennial
Subaru Downhill&SuperG 10:00 A.M. SUSARU DH Training #1 Vail - International
Rolex Legends of Skiing
VisaFocdCup 3:00 P.M. Legends GS Awards HC - Finish Stadium
- 4.x00 P.M. America's Challenge BC - Centennial
March 1-8, 1992 Parallel Preliminaries
7:00 P.M. Opening Ceremonies BC - Centennial
8:00 P.M. Welcome Party BC - Village Hall
Board of Directors
President Gerald R. Ford Thursdaq, March 5
Robert E. Barrett
Carolyn S. Blount 7:45 A.M. Racers` Breakfast BC - Village Hall
]amesBerryCraddock 9:30 A.M. VISA Ford Cup Day 1 BC - Haymeadow
Jack Crosby 11:00 A.M: SUBARU DN Training #2 Vail - International
H. Benjamin Ihrke, Jr.
Harry H. Frampton,lll 1:00 P. M. SUBARU DH Training #3 Vail - International
John Gamsey 7:00 P.M. SRI MAGAZINE Legends of BC - Village Nall
George N. Gillett, Jr. Skiing Banquet
Pepi Gramshammer
fames R. Greenbaum
Steve N. Haber Friday, March 6
Martha Head
William J. Hybl
Elaine W. Kelton - .9:30 A. M. VISA Ford Cup Day 2 BC - Haymeadow
Henry R. Kravis 1I :00 A.H. SUBARU DH Training #4 Vail - International
Frank J. Lynch 1:00 P.H. SUBARU DH Training #5 Vail - international
Fitzhugh Scott
Michael S. Shannon 7:00 P.M. Public Draw Vail - Pepi's Deck
Rodney E. Slifer
Richard L. Swig Saturday, March 7
Oscar L. Tang
8:30 A.M. Sponsor Breakfast Vail - Cookshaek
11:00 A.M. SUBARU Downhill Vail - International
John Gamsey 12:30 P.M. S[JBARU Downhill Awards Vail -Finish Stadium
President
E 6:30,P.M. Public Draw Avon - Walmart parking Lot
8:00 P.M. Ray Charles in Concert Vail - Dobson Arena
-Presented by,, WordPerfect
Sunday, March 8
11:00 A.M. SUBARU Super-G Vail - International
12:30 P.M. SUBARU Super-G Awards Vail -Finish Stadium
0
vAILvAI_rr:Y
FOUNDATION
A Project of the Vail Valley Foundation
Post Office Box 309
Vail, Colorado 81658
• 303-476-9500
FAx 303.476.7320 ® .tee Continuing in the tradition of the 1989 World Alpine Ski Championships •
~ ~
rG..:::%'.:~J '
EAGLE BOUNTY BUILDING
_ S> I BROADW,4V
OFFICE OF THE P.O. BOX 850
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EAGLE. COLORADO 81631
(303) 328-8605 FAX: {303) 328-1207
EAGLE C®UNTY, C®L®RAD®
AGENDA
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MEETING DAY
MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1992
09:00 - 14:00 WORK SESSION -WEEKLY UPDATE
MT. of the HOLY CROSS James R. Fritze ,County Manager
10:00 - 10:45 PENDING LITIGATION
MT. of the HOLY CROSS ROOM Kevin Lindahl, County Attorney
- 1Co45 - 11:00 ***BREAK***
11:00 - 11:30 WORK SESSION -WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN
MT of the HOLY CROSS ROOM Tom Girard, Weed and Pest Control
11:30 - 12:00 `r~~ORK SESSION - RE: WiZLITS LANE
Keith Montag, Director, Community Development -
Larry Metternick, County Engineer
12:00 - 01:30 ***LUNCH*** EMPLOYEE GET ACQUAINTED
s 1J
01:30 - 01:45 CONSENT CALENDAR
EACIE COUNTY ROOM
ITEMS OF A ROU77NE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL NATURE ARE PLACED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR TO ALLOW THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO SPEND ITS 77ME AND ENERGY ON MORE IMPORTANT ITEMS ON A LENGTHY AGENDA. ANY
COMMISSIONER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE 'REMOVED' FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC MAY 'REQUEST' ANY ITEM BE °REMOVED' FROM 7TIE CONSENT AGENDA.
1. BILL PAYING
Linda Pankuch, Accounting
Larry Clever, Controller
ACTION: Approval subject to review by the County Manager.
2. PAYROLL FOR MARCH 5, 1992
James R. Fritze, County Manager
ACTION: Approval subject to review by the County Manager.
3. Arr~OVAL OF MIl~TUTES
Johnnette Phillips, Clerk to Board
ACTION: Consider approval.
4. MOUNTAIN HIGH COMMUNICATION BEACON LEASE
Dan Reynolds, Airport Manager
ACTION: Consider approval.
S. PORTABLE PERSONNEL Lrr-t BID
Tom Solawetz, Building & Grounds Supervisor
ACTION: Consider approval.
6. NOTIFICATION OF GRANT AWARD FOR OLDk:R
AMERICANS ACT TITLE HI FUNDS
Margie Gates, Director of Nursing
ACTION: Consider approval.
7. LIQUOR LICENSE -RENEWAL
376 CORD, d/b/a. iV6'HI~'E, ~'VATER PACKAGF. STORE
Kevin Lindahl, Attorney
ACTION: Consider approval.
8. PROJECT AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY AND
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS FOR MOUNT SOPRIS
PROJECT
James R. Fritze, County Manager
ACTION: Consider approval.
2
~ 4
9. PROJECT AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY AND
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS FOR EAGLE COUNTY
AIRPORT PROJECT
James R. Fritze, County Manager
ACTION: Consider approval.
10. RESOLUTION, CONCERNING REAPPOINTMENT OF
JOANN GLASSIER TO THE BASALT REGIONAL LIBRARY
DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Kevin Lindahl, County Attorney
ACTION: Consider approval.
11. FAIRGROUNDS ARENA PANEL BID
Tom Solawetz, Assistant Buildings & Grounds Supervisor
ACTION: Consider approval.
12. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF EAGLE,
STATE OF COLORADO AND VAH. RECREATION
DISTRICT YOUTH SERVICES
Allen Sartin, Finance Director
ACTION: Consider approval.
13. RESOLUTION Ar Y'~OVING SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR
COLORADO HIGH COUNTRY CELLULAR, FILE NO. ZS-
317-91 FOR i rim UTII.IZATION OF AN EXISTING
BUILDING AND TOWER FOR TOP-MOUNTED ANTENNAS
- FOREST SERVICE PROPERTY NORTH OF DOWD
JUNCTION
Kevin Lindahl, County Attorney
ACTION: Consider approval.
14. CONTRACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF COLORADO AND
EAGLE COUNTY FOR THE WELL CHH.D SCREENING
PRO; R~:1!"J
Margie Gates, Director, Nursing
ACTION: Consider approval.
15. 404 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR COLORADO RIVER
ROAD
Larry Metternick, County Engineer
ACTION: Consider approval.
3
s 4
16. ACCEPTANCE OF FUEL AND LUBRICANT; AND HEAVY
EQUIPMENT BIDS:
COLLETT ENTERPRISES -FUEL
D'ORIO DISTRIBUTING -LUBRICANTS
1992 ASPHALT PATCHING MACHINE
1992 4 WHEEL DRIVE MOTOR GRADER
CAT 966 F LOADER
Don Fessler, Supervisor, Road & Bridge
Bill Smith, Supervisor, Motor Pool
ACTION: Consider approval.
01:45 - 01:50 FINAL SETTLEMENT -ROY WESTON INC.
EAGLE COUNII'ROOM Don Fessler, Road & Bridge Supervisor
ACTION: Consider approval.
01:50 - 02:00 FINAL SETTLEMENT - TARCO INC.
EAGLE COUMYROOM Dan Reynolds, Airport Manager
ACTION: Consider approval.
02:00 - 02:15 LIQUOR LICENSE HEARING -BEAVER TRAP TAVERN
EAGLE coU1V1Y Roots Kevin Lindahl, County Attorney
ACTION: Consider approval.
02:15 - 02:30 AWARD ENGINEERING CONTRACT, EAGLE COUNTY
BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER EAG-028-00.1
EAGLE COUMY ROOM Larry Metternick, County Engineer
ACTION: Consider approval.
02:30 - 03:00 . ~ ArI~~AL BY ROY MOSHER, RE: DENIAL OF FINAL PLAT
AMEND. OF LADYBELLE VIEW SUBDIVISION, LOT 1
EAGLE COUMYROOM Roy Mosher
Tom Allender, Planner, Community Development
"aCTION: C®Ii$IdC.r ap : -
THIS AGENDA IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY -ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE BOARD WHILE
IN SESSION MAY CONSIDER OTHER ITEMS THAT ARE BROUGHT BEFORE Tr. .
4
EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING
_ 551 BROADWAY
OFFICE OF THE ~ P.O. BOX 850
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ' EAGLE. COLORADO 61631
(303) 328.8605 fAX: (303) 328-1201
X1':4: "7.: '•F°~: jt,:. _
EAGLE C®UNTY, C®L®RAL~®
AGENDA
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MEETING DAY
TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1992
09:00 - 12:30 AMERICANS WITH DISABILII gr:S ACT (ADA) SEMINAR
1FacIE coumYxooar ~ Gus Achey, Mountain States Employers Council
THIS AGENDA IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY -ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE BOARD WHILE
IN SESSION MAY CONSIDER OTHER ITEMS THAT ARE BROUGHT BEFORE TT.
SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY 2-27-92 18:56 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1/ 5
1 •
EAGI F CQUNIY BIl~.DING
551 AaOADy/AY
OFFICE C1F 7HE 'i,• PA. 6A% 650
BOARD OF COMAlISSIONEII;S h'• F.AGU:, COLOR,4Db 8163 )
(303) 3]58605 FA)E: (303) 326.7207
:'ti t:: .Zs'~'~
EP?CLE Call~dT~f, ~~LQIt~1pCJ
~?.G~NDA
BQARD OF C{)UNTY CDIVIMIS5IQNL1~
REGULAR M~]~TIN+G I)AY
MONDAY, MAR~i~ 2, 1992 •
0:00 -1o:a0 ~ wol~ sFSSraN - wE~.Y url,A'li"E
are: Bur.~cs James R. Fritxe , County Manager
10:00 - 10:4 ~.~HAII~Q'i I.rIT~~aATI®N
arr. ~r>~ ac~er ca~ss Rar~aa K+
evin Lindahl, County Attorney
11:00 - 11:30 ~VOdtK SF~ION - W ~,.C,r.r 11~iAletAGE11~NT PLAN
an'q/tke aaL~ crross xooat Tom Girard, Weed and Pest Control
11x30 -1~:Q0 Wfa1tI~ SESSION - RE: W1LI.I'I'S LANE
Keith Montag, biroct~r, Community i~velopment
Larry Metternicl~, County Engineer
12:00 - 01:30 ~'~~L~dGH~#~ EL~9lt~ I~ET AG4~UA,~~~ ><,r.Jl~
SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-27-92 18 57 3033287207-' 3034792157;# 2/ 5
o~:~a - oi:~ car~sT
E~c~ corrNtYiaOOM
l78MSOFARO[l7PNEAl~ N17Ml~GMRWEIisldLNdTURBdREPLAGED 4NT6fH GVjN.TBN!'G1fENDAR 71~~lLLOW rSEBOAR?] f7F
OOllN7Y COh4Jbaa.ut,A~d4S 7n SPEND T7S TIME d1VD ENERGY pN MOIL' IMPORTdA7P (7EMS v11? d 1E11Pa4E3' A(r~~4. .ANY
C(7Atddt55lOA&R3lAYREQuES1'7FdArANiYBl~ FS 1t8A017V14D•3PROa! 7FIB CiCDJ~SAJ~!'L`AGF.ND.4R.lM) L9?M~ERED SEPARA7$LY.
ANY J19~Jxfl'R Q!~ 7HE Fi1BddC d~ilY "~¢UE57'° ANY III tiL "RFdIiOVBL1 ° FROM THB ~pN3'BNI ACB]YDA.
1. ~II.L PA~V~ ~ .
Linda Panltuch, Accounting
Larry Glover, Cantrmller
A~'~B~Nt Arru.~val subj~t ~ revi~v by the County+ Matrager.
2. ~~~~LL FQ3It MARCH 5, L~2
James 1L, Fritze, County Manager
r~~; Y Y~1dT: Appa+oval subject tv review by the County Manager.
3. ,~°t~VAL CF MIlYU~'ffi
Johnnette Phillips, Clerk to Board
A~:'i x~l~t: Consider approval.
~6" NdOill~'~~lIIt~I ~C~ Cd:I'~CATI~ht B~~CCI~1 LR~iSE
fan Reynolds, Ai.Y~.,.t Manager
A~ i YEN: Consider app~val.
S. ~+C)R'Y'E4BLR Y'ERS~]VPdIi.I.. I.~ r B~
Tpm Solawetz, Building ~ grounds Supervisor
ACTIN: Considcx approval.
6. l~l~ x tr YCA~.'l[01~1 bp' G~ A~VAR~3 li'~AR ~I,HARIt
~ICRYC~NS ACT i<t~,,.~ III ~'iJl~1DS
Margie Gates, Director of Nursing
ACTii~l~: Consider appmval.
7. LJQ~IQR LICIIYSI~ - ]R&~l~VAL
376 COQ'. d/bta ~'a~i.~ ~Vt~trx~ I'ACI{AG~ ST~RR
~evirl Lindahl, Attorney
ACTION: Consider approval.
S. I~~ + CT A~G1~E:~l9EI~IT BaA, i ~~V ~..e~~T F.A~I.iC ~]?IJP~ITY Ai~~
1~tICIIT ~A ~ r.~i l±~Cl~~ ~R M(AiIP('I' SOP'~IS
PRO,~RCT
Jrunes R. Fritze, County lager
ACTIUI~d: Consider approval.
2
SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 2-27-92 18 57 3033287207- 3034792157;# 3/ 5
9. FR~DJ.ECT ~C.F,i~T BIETTVw ]~GI.~ IC~1U1V~.'~t A1VD
$CxHT ~A~~ ENG~~:oS ~I$ F.A4iri~+ C~i]T1lTY
Y~O1xT 1'~~~CT
Jatuus R. Fri~tze, Comity Idtamager
AC~~~Ns Consider a~,~,+~,~val.
la. ~~,uT~GN, ~~N~:~~ ~ aF
at~~NN CI,A~~,u~c'IYD , ~ ~~AALT ~~ION~,
IDI~T~tICT ~4~~ ~F T~TEE,~
l~evin lindahl, County Attorney
AC~Yt~?N: Consider approval.
x~.. FA~~RG~TI~DS tet~ PAIeT~I. ~
Torn Svlawet~, Assistant Buildings a4c Grounds Su~rvisor
~iCTI(~N: Consider approval.
1~. A~~iw'u B~T~4u.:fa~T '~~G C(AIJIVTY GF EA~Y~, .
S~'A~ t:BF CG~3H~IE(D t~ND ~ATi.? ~]ECRF,A~'j~1~
It~.~TItICT `YUL'r'~ SEIt~ICF~ '
A11en Berlin, Finance Dir®ctor
ACTIGN: Consider approval.
l3. ~gg~J~/~pp.Qp~I,,T~~.~~(~~~~TQ'''~~/Yy r'~,~y~gD~~~p7T~ q~~P~EryCpI*~3rLrgT,J~bE F~,rFr.~1~,4~p~'d~'yFrt~D~lvt
6.yy~d~~JyyyVSwtyyn++/~u+~vlY luarl~ TA.ry4~V~1~VgT~p~~B O..~pi~ISd~~JgW~i*,~p~ydT'~kJ~~~~~I~~+Aay74~I~F7~°
~17 YA i ~ ~i *J ~3.L~Y~jh ll~fl® L/F Ly1V l]rL~Y?7TiLV
S~IILIDIN~i'r 1~1®T~A1~ '~[b~$ 7'i~iI~=1V~~~1'~`.~' 1 ~11~ ~1'~lN~~'!
- FG~T ~~t~ICE Plt~r1']C NURT~ ~F I~Di~
JgJNC'1'iON
Ifeviai Cotanty Attorney
~l~Ti®1~T: Consider approval.
14. C~1C~" i3t~T~~~,nT ~~m STATE +DF C4I.~D~AIDG A?NI~
EAGLE C~~J1VT~' FOB ~a~ ELI, ~~D SCI8EII0TIlV~
1'~G~~A1b1C
lViargie Gates, 3)irectvr, Nursing
ACTIGNa Consider approval.
1 S. ~il4 x+,~~1Vd1T APPL~CAT~~DN FCDI~ C~1I~~ID(i ~BYdF.1~
ROAD
Larry NTetternick, County Engineer .
~?CTI~1N: Canaider approval.
3
SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-27-92 1856 ; 30332872D7-~ 3034792157;# 4/ 5
I6. ACC~TAATC~ ~A~' FBI. Al 1,1L1J31~YCANT; A~(D ~1~'~l
UIP1Vi~le1"I` ~~Sa
C~LLET~' ~ n~ - ~Vl~L
T!'4'IItIU I$ISTIii~L ~~dG - LT3~ItIC~N'['S
192 A,SF~AL~' »ATC~Ilo1~ MAt~tiu~
1992 4 Vd~~.~;1L 1~R~F IVit:DT~~ 4~
CAT 9~d g+' L~A]D~:e~
Yin Fessler, ~upervisar, Ra~ad & Bride
Bill Smith, Supervisory 1Vlotor P'oo1
t~CTd®1~Te .Consider approval.
01:45 - X1:50 ~1.VAZ, SE g ~ n ~ RAY ~F.~TCDN II~Ce
~ar~c~avr~rn~ROa~r I3an Fessler, Raad & Bride Supervisor
~C'i'I~1V: Consider approval.
V1:50 ° V.4:~JV 811~4SiJ ~1L~YJSS1.91i9`i1~Y T~Lw! ilYOrs
~ac~awnm•Raa~ Ilan Reynolds, Aia~rt 1Manager
AC'1'I[3I~T: Consider approval.
02x00 -02:15 LIQUQR I.Ia:SE G - ~~t1~~R T~A~ TAVF1~m1
~cr~e cx~z,Nrr,~oone Kevin Lindahl, County Attorney
AC'L~~N: Consider approval.
02x15 ° 02:3Q A~AIB~ ~14p~~~IIN~ C~N'~~AC~'g t~LE CQ><TN'I`Y
BRA ST~d.Tu.: i eJli~ ~AA~2.I
~evo~ Larry l~etternick, CotAnty Fa:~iueer
_ .~CTiI?N: Consider approval..
02x30 - 03:00 A,r~r~AI~ RCY 10~~~~1tc9 REt DEI~TIAL F'BV1#.I. FL~I.T
I.AY)~ ~ S~~IF~LSI~1~, 1[.d3T a
c~znvr~xao~ Ray lVlccssher
Tam Allender, planner, Community 13eve1apaaent
Ar„ a ~~DN: Consider appeal.
T}II8 A,GlTsNbA 75 PROs ~unu~ FOR 1NPORA+lATIONAL Pi7RP09ES ONLY • ALd. TIlbIL'9 ARS AFFROXa~IATB. TfAH BG1AR0 4KHf (.13
I1V 583970N MAY CONSIDffil OTHRR [f8M3 '!'HAT /tR8 SR~7GAT B~DgH t'~'.
5ENT BY ~ EAGLE COUNTY 2-27-92 ; 18 59 ; 30332872071 3034792157; # 5/ 5
1~
• EAGiF. Cc7lINTY BUILDING ~
S 5 I BRdApWAY t
OFHCF [tF rl-fE P.O. AOX 850 '
BOARD OF COMMISSIQNEI~i ~ fAGLE, COLORAISp 8163)
{303) 3I6.86U5 ~ FAR; (303) 326.7107
s..•,:~.
~W/t~i ,iYP~
BO~ItD ~F CC7IJA1~'X ~~MNTI~3I~NEI~
R~QaVJ'L~ 11~IEETIlVG I~AY
7i`U~?5.~~~, R~dAIt.CH 1992
V9i~ ° A~a~9Y lrL~l\~ ~ ~~A'Sfll1~lA.~.A7 tA~~ ~R4A1~!'7?J ~dLt~~E1VLi14 '
tx,~xr~r Gus Achey, Mounter Mates ~tplmyexs council •
T91SS AG~VDA ~ PR'adGQl~ k~UR iNl~ORMATI~Nt1L P~1f~t~SFrS UNl.X- Aid.T1A66,4 f1REl: AP'P~aKiMATfG. T~lf~ BOARb wHII~
» sF.99IDN bIAY CQx5II7F.R li~rrac i!'HMS TEAT ARB BROUOfif a~-unB QA'.
~y
TOWN OF VEIL
75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor
Vail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2100
FAX 303-479-2157 February 28, 1992
Mr. Kent Mueller
Town Manager
Town of Minturn
Minturn, Colorado 81645
Dear Kent:
On behalf of the Vail Town Council and our entire community, I extend strong
support for the proposed Eagle River Trail, intended to span the distance between
the Forest Service District Headquarters and the Minturn municipal parking area
This multi-use path would be a desirable recreation amenity for the area, as well as
a safe route for the many residents and guests who currently travel along this
distance.
As you know, funding was recently approved for construction of a recreation
path linking the western portion of Vail, through Dowd Junction to highway 6. A
. paved trail currently extends from Summit County over Vail Pass and through the
town of Vail. The construction of the Dowd Junction trail,, in combination with a
proposed Eagle River Trail, would represent a major step toward our goal of
providing a safe and efficient system of recreation paths which eventually connects
with the newly constructed trail through Glenwood Canyon. The Eagle River Trail
could potentially provide access to various National Forest System Trails, as well,
including Grouse Creek, Meadow Mountain, Martin Creek, and the Two Elk National
Recreation Trail.
Recreation continues to be our area's strongest offering and we are working -
to together to provide quality amenities for a wide variety of outdoor activities. The
Eagle River Trail will be utilized by bicyclists, hikers, joggers, kayakers and rafters,
anglers and cross country skiers, and will play an important part in the overall
recreational utilization of the Eagle River corridor.
Again, we extend our full support for your efforts toward the Eagle River Trail
goal.
Sincerely,
~
r~~
Peggy Osterfoss
Mayor
SPEAK UP MEETING
BATCH'S RESTAURANT
' FEBRUARY 19, 1992
5:30 PM
Attendees Others
Karen Kutz Ken Hughey
Ron Stott Ron Phillips ~ .
Mitch Imber Greg Hall -
Scott Taylor Allen Knox
Linda Stott Kristan Pritz
Pepi Langegger Dick Duran
Jim Schnebly Susan Scanlan
Dick Neal Liz Webster
Mazka Mosher Jim Gibson ~ -
Tom Steinberg
.Peggy Osterfoss
The following is a recap of mangy comments made try those attending the Town of Vail's second
community "Speak-Up" Meeting. A ~ designates individual speakers.
~ Peggy Osterfoss welcomed the community and introduced Bruce Chapman, to act as
facilitator. '
~`r What is the status of the conference center? -
(Pe~~v Osterfoss: A presentation was given by the Performance Arts & Conference
Steering Committee to the Town Council yesterday. Subcommittees will be formed
to target the specific areas which must be addressed next i.e., financing, .
programming, design,. etc.)
~'r Marketing dollars will be one of the most important things for the future of the _
Valley. We need to start more effectively marketing on a year round basis. We
should have all municipalities and organizations in the Valley pay their fair share.
/Tim Gibson: We are looking at various alternatives to fund marketing, including the
possibility of forming a special tourist district in the County, with approval of the
State legislature. The district concept would be premised on those who benefit, pay.
The function would be for mazketing solely.)
~ Why don't we utilize the ski instructors who leave in the summer and go elsewhere
in the world as "marketing agents"?
(Tim Gibson: This is a good idea. The ski instructors represent a band of
ambassadors we could utilize.)
1
~ The Vail Valley Marketing Board Winter-Summer cross marketing effort needs to
` ~ increase. We need to tap into our winter guests to come back in the summer.
~ Why doesn't Ron or Peggy give a recap of things that have happened recently.
(PegQV Osterfoss: Council goal setting was yesterday; Vail Housing Authority will
be giving a report to Town Council on March 10; we are looking at various methods
to fund both marketing and a Performing Arts and Conference center; the Council
is focusing on additional land acquisition; we are currently landscaping the I-70
interchanges and are focusing on further landscaping.)
~ What is the timing on the interchange landscaping?
(Ken Hu~hev: It's a 3-5 year project.)
(Ron Phillips: Another high priority is the completion of recreation paths in the area.
Tomorrow, the Transportation Commission from the State will consider $875,000 for
completing the Dowd Junction path. We are working toward a system which goes
from Summit County to Glenwood.)
(Pe~QV Osterfoss: We are also looking at consolidation of services through the Valley;
i.e., Eagle County, Town of Avon, Town of Vail -for transportation, recreation and
other services.)
~ Have you considered consolidation of Police and Fire?
(Tom Steinberg: Nothing specific has bee addressed at this point.)
~ Is the bike path plowed in West Vail on the south side?
(Ken Hu~hev: No. However, it is plowed on the north side in West Vail. Some
people like the trails to remain unplowed so they can ski and snowshoe on them.)
~"r What about keeping the Vail Pass bike path clear? Has the CDOT considered putting
in drainage to keep the path clean? Summit County maintains their side beautifully; _
the Vail side is in poor shape.
. (Ron Phillips: We have begun addressing this. The CDOT District 3 begins at the
bottom of Vail Pass and goes west. The maintenance district responsible for Vail Pass
is located in Denver. We will begin talking with the State to see' if we can address
the situation.)
~ The Town needs to somehow separate the walkers from the cyclists on the paths.
What about developing a walking path in addition to the bike path?
(Tom Steinberg: Originally, it was intended that a dirt or chip path for walking be
adjacent to the paved path. Perhaps we need to work toward this.)
2
~`r What is the status of the streamwalk?
(Ron Phillips: It's on hold.)
~z You need more signs on the paths. You should go over to Summit County to see an
example of an excellent bike path system.
~`r What about traffic coritrol at the four-way stop?
(Ken Hu~hev: The volume of traffic at the intersection makes it difficult; but our
personnel handling the job are the best we've had yet. We are looking at having an
underpass lSuilt at Simba Run, but there are no plans for new interchanges. The
Simba project is 5-8 years away with a $2 million cost.)
~`r What about installing traffic signals?
(Ken Hu~hev: It is hard to tell if that would hurt or help.)
~ What about pulling more of the traffic off at East Vail? .
~ What about putting outlying lots in East Vail?
(Ken Hu~hev: There is very limited land in East Vail, but there has been talk about
building a lot on Vail Pass.}
~r Are there any lots on North Frontage Road for free parking?
(Ken Hu~hev: There is very limited parking at.Red Sandstone school,-the. "tot lot" is
used on the weekends.}
~`r Why do all the buses seem to run five minutes late?
(Ken Huehev: There is no policy like that.)
. ~`r What about the East Vail interchange? How do you know it will look good? -
(Ken Hu~hev: We are optimistic. We hope to enhance it with some larger trees.. It
is a huge tract of land and we have spent a lot of money on the landscaping project.)
~ Is the soccer field free for parking? Can this be reserved for a Vail Associates/Town
of Vail employee lot? It's usually full by 8:00 AM.
(Ken Hu~hev: It would be difficult to draw the line on which employees would be
allowed to use it.)
3
~ What about solar driers (clothes lines)? Are they illegal in Vail?
(Tom Steinberg: Yes. The law goes back 25 years to the Vail Associates covenants.)
~~r Could this be reviewed?
(Tom Steinberg: This is controversial because they are tacky.)
~`r It seems like a ski resort should be more environmentally conscientious than that. -
Peggy Osterfoss thanked everyone for attending and the meeting was concluded.
s
f
-
F,L ~
~~is7R~~U7~1
• w
c ~ 3/3~
February 24, 1992
' TO: Vail Town Council
FROM: George and Lizette Lamb
RE: Proposed Utility Underground District.
We have written this memo to clarify our "NO" response to the pall.
Most importantly, we stress that we are in favor of the concept of undergrounding the
electric lines within our neighborhood and we feel that the cost of the project should be
borne by the immediate property owners versus others adjacent to the effected area and
beyond.
What we do not agree with is the proposed assessment methods which have been
discussed and, specifically, the one detailed in the February 4th letter fxom Ron Phillips.
We applaud the individuals who have. spent many hours attempting to finalize this
project. However, we feel it is unfortunate that this group has not, at least recently,
sought the assistance from others in our area who have offered help.
In our opinion, our particular East Vail neighborhood is made up of reasonable and
responsible individuals who collectively represent a majority favoring the project, but
under a fair assessment basis.
We have conscientiously not. made any effort to argue our viewpoint or attempt to change
anyone's position in this matter, We feel it important that everyone make up their own
mind, but with information which is clear and understandable. We were confused so did
same research on our own.
Page 2
Vail Town Council
It is our understanding that the present proposal divides properties into four groups:
1. Vacant Lots (approximate assessment - $820-$860)
2. Developed Lots: Underground to Underground Service (same as above, per meter,
i.e. duplex would be doubled)
3. Developed Lots: Underground to Overhead Service (approximately $1,700-$1,750
per meter)
4. Developed Lots: Overhead to Overhead Service (approximately $2,500-$2,600 per
meter)
Without arbsing the merits and "fairness" of assessing property types 1 and 2 at all or at
what figure, we would like to point out the many different sub-categories of Types 3 and
4.
A. Underground Requiring A Road Cut
If a road cut is required to connect either a 'Tyne 3 or Type 4 property to the new
Holy Cross transformer, the cost of that installation will be considerably greater
than a connection which does not require a road cut or the power where the power
has already ben buried across the road.
B. Tvoe 3 Duplex or 4-Plea Metered at the Hojase
In this situation, the main power line runs from the Holy Cross supply as one
line is divided at the house. In our view, there really is not difference relative
to connecting to a new underground Holy Cress transformer than that of a single
family/one meter situation,
To further illustrate both the inexact and variable/unknown nature of the proposed
assessments, the following are two specific examples:
n
Page 3
Vail Town Council
Tvoe 4 Duplex (Lot 3, Block 51~
As required by the town of Vail in 1991, the primary side of this duplex buried its
overhead line across Juniper Lane to the overhead Holy Cross power transformer and
in conjunction with a major remodel. Showing some foresight, conduit was installed for
the eventual undergrounding of the electrical for the secondary side. Under the current _
assessment proration, both sides are being assessed approximately $2,500 or a total of
$5,000. the actual cost of the recent undergrounding was $7,000.
Twe 3 Duplex (Lot 1S, Block S)
This property which we own is metered at the house and is undergrounded across
Meadow Drive and to the overhead power pole. The new underground transformer will
be in the same location. An, independent electrical contractor familiar with such
installation has estimated the total cost to connect to the new underground facility to be
$200=$400. The proposed assessment is $3,496.40.
We are in favor of assisting over-burdened conversions, but it might be argued that these
two properties are contributing more than a reasonable amount are are being over-
burdened.
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TOES®AY, MARCH 3, 1992
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Ten Year Employee Recognition.
* Rick Onorato, Police Department.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
3. Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of Minutes of February 4, 1992, and February 18, 1992 evening
meeting minutes.
B. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance amending
Section 8.24.090 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, Colorado, to
provide for the owner or occupant of any property within the Town of Vail to
keep the sidewalks in the public right-of-way on adjacent or abutting such lot or
parcels free and clear from ice, snow, and other obstructions.
4. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1992, continued from first reading January 7, 1992, an
ordinance declaring the intention of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, to
create a Local Improvement District within the boundaries of the Town of Vail for the
purpose of converting existing overhead electric facilities to underground locations;
adoption of details and specifications therefore.
5. Resolution No. 5, Series of 1992, a resolution designating Colorado Surplus Asset
Fund Trust, 1800 Glenarm Place, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado, 80202 as a depository
for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and
the statutes of the State of Colorado.
6. Town Council Appeal of the Design Review Board decision to grant final design
approval for a project at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater which included an expanded
seating area and weatherproofing. Applicant: Vail Valley Foundation/Jim Morter,
Architect.
7. Appointment of Local Licensing Authority Member.
8. Adjournment.
C:WGENDA.TC