Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUIESDAY, APRIL 7, 1992 7:30 P.IVI. AGENDA 1. Ten Year Employee Recognition. Kevin Whelan, Fire Department. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of Minutes of March 3, 1992, and March 17, 1992 evening meeting minutes. B. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1992, second reading, an amendment to Chapter 18.34 of the Vail Municipal Code adding construction staging sites as a conditional use in the Parking Zone District. (Applicant: Johannes Faessler) 4. Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance amending Title 9, Section 5 of the Vail Municipal Code by the Addition of Chapter 9.54 -Restrictions on the Possession of Glass Containers. 5. Ordinance No. 7, Series 1992, first reading, an ordinance adopting the Town of Vail Art in Public Places program policies and guidelines; establishing a board for the process of reviewing proposed public artwork for the Town of Vail; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 6. Ordinance No. 8, Series 1992, first reading, an ordinance providing for the establishment of Special Development District No. 28, Christiania at Vail; adopting a development plan for Special Development District No. 28 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. (Applicant: Paul Johnston) 7. Resolution No. 9, Series of 1992, a resolution approving the Vail Transportation Master Plan for the Town of Vail; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 8. Appointment of Art in Public Places Board Member. 9. Adjournment. C:VIGENDA.TC VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1992 7:30 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 p.m. 1. Ten Year Employee Recognition. Ron Phillips Kevin Whelan, Fire Department. 7:45 p.m. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:50 p.m. 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of Minutes of March 3, 1992, and March 17, 1992 evening meeting minutes. Andy Knudtsen B. Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1992, second reading, an amendment to Chapter 18.34 of the Vail Municipal Code adding construction staging sites as a conditional use in the Parking Zone District. (Applicant: Johannes Faessler) 8:00 p.m. 4. Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Eskwith amending Title 9, Section 5 of the Vail Municipal Code by the Addition of Chapter 9.54 -Restrictions on the Possession of Glass Containers. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1992, on first reading. Backaround Rationale: The Vail Recreation District has requested the passage of this ordinance to deal with a problem they are having with glass containers in parks and athletic fields. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1992, on first reading. 8:10 p.m. 5. Ordinance No. 7, Series 1992, first reading., an ordinance Shelly Mello adopting the Town of Vail Art in Public Places program policies and guidelines; establishing a board for the process of reviewing proposed public artwork for the Town of Vail; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Action Reauested of Council.: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1992, on first reading. Backaround Rationale: In July, 1989, a resolution was approved establishing a temporary AIPP Board and program. Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1992, will permanently establish the program. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 7, Series of 1992, on first reading. 1 8:20 p.m. 6. Ordinance No. 8, Series 1992, first reading., an ordinance Mike Mollica providing for the establishment of Special Development District No. 28, Christiania at Vail; adopting a development plan for Special Development District No. 28 in accordance with Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code and setting forth details in regard thereto. (Applicant: Paul Johnston) Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1992, on first reading. Backaround Rationale: The Planning and Environmental Commission, on March 23, 1992, in a public hearing, unanimously recommended approval (by a vote of 4-0) of the establishment of an SDD for the Christiania at Vail. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the establishment of the SDD request per the staff memo enclosed, which is dated March 23, 1992. 9:50 p.m. 7. Resolution No. 9, Series of 1992, a resolution approving the Vail Greg Hall Transportation Master Plan for the Town of Vail; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Action Requested of Council: Review the final report relating to the Vail Transportation Master Plan. Backaround Rationale: Council has reviewed and revised the recommendations relating to the Vail Transportation Master Plan. The final changes have been included in the final report to the Council, which is now ready for final Council approval. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 9, Series of 1992. 10:20 p.m. 8. Appointment of Art in Public Places board member. Shelly Mello Action Requested of Council.: Appoint one board member. Backaround Rationale: Candidate(s) were interviewed at today's work session. 9. Adjournment. C:VIGENDA.TCE 2 s. MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 3, 1992 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 3, 1992, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob Levine Bob Buckley TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Merv Lapin and Tom Steinberg were not present as the meeting began. The first item on the agenda was a TOV Ten Year Employee Recognition for Rick Onorato. Mayor Osterfoss moved on to the second item on the agenda as Rick was not present as the meeting began. Second on the agenda was Citizen Participation. In response to Josef Staufer's inquiry about the cemetery, Ron Phillips advised a management plan was underway. Mr. Staufer also commented on a recent news article concerning the Town's 5-year financial projection. He did not feel the Town should base a 5-year financial projection on recession year figures. Ron explained the news article mentioned did not accurately represent the information presented to Council, and clarified for Mr. Staufer there would have to be new revenue sources to fund any new projects. Item No. 3 was a Consent Agenda consisting of two items: A. Approval of Minutes of February 4, 1992, and February 18, 1992, evening meetings. B. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance amending Section 8.24.090 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, Colorado, to provide for the owner or occupant of any property within the Town of Vail to keep the sidewalks in the public right-of-way on adjacent or abutting such lot or parcels free and clear from ice, snow, and other obstructions. Mayor Osterfoss read the titles in full. Jim Gibson moved to approve both items on the Consent Agenda, with a second from Rob Levine. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. As Rick Onorato arrived, Mayor Osterfoss returned to Item No. 1 on the agenda. Pam Brandmeyer introduced Rick Onorato, Detective Sergeant for the Town of Vail Police Department, and thanked him for his years of dedicated service. Acting Police Chief Corey Schmidt congratulated Rick. Item No. 4 was Ordinance No.1, Series of 1992, continued from first reading January 7,1992, an ordinance declaring the intention of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, to create a Local Improvement District within the boundaries of the Town of Vail for the purpose of converting existing overhead electric facilities to underground locations; and adoption of details and specifications therefore. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Greg Hall reviewed results of the East Vail Utility Undergrounding Property Owner Poll report dated March 3,1992. Of 104 polls sent by certified mail, 80 polls were returned - a 77% return rate. 60% responded as not in favor of the project, 38% responded in favor. Based on those results, Rob Levine moved to defeat Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1992, with a second from Jim Shearer. Before a vote was taken, Nancy Gibson acknowledged cost allocation of the project seemed to be the primary reason for the negative poll response, and asked Council if there were any alternatives for dividing the cost among property owners in the area. She appealed to Council to further examine this and seek other options. Peggy Osterfoss said the options had been examined, and asked Nancy for ideas, but she could offer none. Nancy asked if the Town would look at the issue again. Larry Eskwith advised another ordinance organizing a local improvement district for the area was possible. Dave Rogers, co-originator of this effort, thanked Council for supporting the effort. He felt ~ was a shame they could not take Holy Cross Electric up on their offer to participate in the undergrounding project. He felt property owners liked the idea, but were nervous about costs getting out of hand. He noted early polls he had taken indicated 80% of property owners were in favor of the project at a lower dollar figure, and appealed to Council to again table the ordinance. Ann Louthan felt property owners had not all received and responded to the poll, and offered to help Nancy with future efforts to see the utilities undergrounded and to work with the cable company. Roger Tilkmeier said he had sent in a "no" vote because he wanted everyone who would benefit 1 from the project to share in the cost. Jim Gibson asked Roger if he could chair a committee to further pursue the project, but Roger advised he would be unable to at this time. Jim Gibson felt most East Vail residents wanted the undergrounding, and it was a matter of cost. He wanted to table the ordinance in order to keep the project alive. At this point, Rob Levine withdrew his motion to defeat the ordinance. Jim Gibson then moved to table the ordinance . until August 1, 1992. That motion was seconded by Bob Buckley. Before a vote was taken, Ron Phillips pointed out the poll sent out clearly indicated response to it would decide the issue. Peggy agreed, and added the Town was not killing the concept of undergrounding. Roger felt he would rather see this ordinance defeated at this time, feeling if it were tabled it would be presented again in the same form. Jeff Bowen emphasized the poll results clearly indicated a strong statement from property owners not to proceed. Jim Shearer felt if the Town defeated this ordinance at this time, more property owners would rise to help see the project become a reality. Bob Buckley suggested enlargement or redefinition of the District. Larry indicated that would require another study by the engineer. After further discussion, a vote was taken on Jim Gibson's motion to table the ordinance until August 1, 1982 and that motion failed, 2-3, Jim Shearer, Peggy Osterfoss, and Rob Levine opposed. Rob Levine moved to defeat Ordinance No.1, Series of 1992, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and that motion passed, 3-2, Bob Buckley and Jim Gibson opposed. Ron encouraged the property owners to get together to inspire additional community involvement for further review of d'rfferent cost allocation formulas. Council members Merv Lapin and Tom Steinberg arrived at 8:20 p.m. as discussion began on agenda Item No. 5. Item No. 5 was Resolution No. 5, Series of 1992, a resolution designating Colorado Surplus Asset Fund Trust, 1800 Glenarm Place, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado, 80202 as a depository for the funds of the Town as permitted by the Charter of the Town, its ordinances, and the statutes of the State of Colorado. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. After a brief review by Steve Thompson, Jim Gibson moved to approve Resolution No. 5, with a second from Bob Buckley. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 6 was a Town Council appeal of the Design Review Board (DRB) decision to grant final design approval for a project at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater which included an expanded seating area and weatherproofing. The applicant was the Vail Valley Foundation. Mike Mollica explained the DRB voted to approve the request on February 19, 1992, 4-1, Diana Donovan opposed, with three recommendations: (1) that lighting at the north end of the amphitheater be at the lowest possible height and be coordinated with TOV when locating, (2) that consideration be given to installation of a sound wall/baffle along the north berm, and (3) that a matte finish on fabric screens be used. He said Diana felt the suggested remodeling plans were not compatible with existing design at the amphitheater. Harry Frampton noted two primary reasons for remodeling: (1) the seasonal use of the amphitheater, now July 1 to late August, could be extended by three weeks at each end of the season, and (2) performers had expressed concerns about direct sun light interference, rain and wind conditions, lack of evenly dispersed heat on stage and in basement dressing rooms, and a need for increased lighting. He said some performers had refused to perform there again under present conditions. Jim Morter, the original architect, spoke about his considerations while reviewing the amphitheater design to accommodate the reasons mentioned by Harry. He noted he was under strict direction not to destroy the present outdoor amphitheater ambiance, but was asked to come up with compatible designs to protect the stage and audience. He displayed a model of the proposed redesign, and said he felt the architectural changes he described fully addressed Diana's concerns. Ned Gwathmey, Chairman of the DRB, said, after the DRB's review of the redesign, the DRB felt, given the technical problems, the redesign was incompliance with the DRB guidelines and they approved it. Merv Lapin asked if Bravo felt their conditions were met by the redesign, and Pat Herrington said they were. Flo Steinberg spoke about her concerns as expressed in her letter to Council dated March 4, 1992. She asked for a thorough review of the project, feeling the redesign was inconsistent with the original architecture. Jim Morter reassured her all of the redesign had been prepared with concentrated effort to be as consistent as possible with the original design. Merv Lapin moved to uphold the DRB's decision to grant final design approval for the project, with a second from Rob Levine. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 7 was the appointment of a Local Licensing Authority Member. Jim Gibson moved to re-appoint Bill Bishop to the Local Licensing Authority, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was .made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:IMINSMAR3.92 . 2 MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 17, 1992 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 17, 1992, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob Levine Bob Buckley TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Martha Raecker, Town Clerk The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Jan Strauch inquired about a house on S. Frontage Road which appeared to be in some phase of construction. He had noticed the house had what appeared to be exposed aluminum insulation for quite some time. He wanted to know how long the exposed insulation would remain that way. Kristan Pritz advised him the property owner had an active permit, and thought the project was being delayed due to financing problems. She said the Community Development Department was aware of the situation. Item No. 2 was a required report by the Vail Valley Marketing Board (VVMB) on the effectiveness of the marketing and promotional program financed by funds raised pursuant to Section 5.04.140 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Introductory comments were delivered by Frank Johnson, President, VVMB. Dave Reece, President of RSA Advertising Agency, gave an overview of strategies. Shari Fowler, Account Executive with RSA, narrated a slide presentation and reviewed details of four marketing strategies the VVMB was now using including Front Range marketing, destination marketing, marketing to groups and meeting planners, and winter/summer cross-sell marketing. Frank spoke about the VVMB's marketing response tracking and addressed market share facts and figures related to the summer market share of Colorado resorts. Dave recognized the VVMB's $650,000 budget, and proceeded to itemize the VVMB's "wish list" which included additional funding to reach other U.S. markets, as well as Mexican and international markets, a desire to utilize travel agent marketing, more winter/summer cross-sell activity marketing, an expanded destination marketing media campaign, more collective Valley-wide promotional efforts, and more research to track marketing results. Frank pointed out the ordinance funding the VVMB would expire this year and he asked Council for their commitment to extend it, and for their enthusiastic support, leadership, creativity, open mindedness, and ded'+cation to upkeep and maintenance of the product: Vail. Peggy Osterfoss thanked Frank and the entire VVMB for the creative and professional role model they set for the Valley as a whole. Jim Gibson expressed his appreciation for all the VVMB had done. He added one observation regarding marketing Vail as a great place for active seniors. He felt this was a fast growing market which needed attention. Frank felt there would be more focus on this market in the future. Jan Strauch said a detailed plan was to be prepared by early July for Council's review. Dave added assistance might also be available through the Colorado Tourism Board. Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 18.34 of the Vail Municipal Code, adding construction staging sites as a conditional use. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 4 on first reading, with a second from Menr Lapin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 4 was Resolution No. 6, Series of 1992, a resolution designating The Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust as April 26 through May 3,1992. Mayor Osterfoss read the tale in full. Menr Lapin moved to approve Resolution No. 5, with a ~sewnd from Rob Levine. Before a vote was taken, Tom Steinberg spoke about the importance of this item and applauded the organization who brought this resolution topic to the Town's attention. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 5 was Resolution No. 7, Series of 1992, a resolution designating the week of April 5 through April 11,1992, as Week of the Young Child. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim Gibson moved to approve Resolution No. 7, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 6 was an appeal of a Design Review Board (DRB) decision denying applicant Leroy Schmidt's request to separate a proposed primary unit from an existing secondary unit at the Schmidt residence, Lot G-1, Lionsridge Filing No. 1 at 1410 Buffehr Creek Road. Council had visited the site during work session. Shelly Mello reviewed the February 19, 1992, DRB decision. She said the DRB unanimously voted to deny the request, finding there were no substantial site constraints, per Section 18.54.050(1) -Design Guidelines, Duplex and Primary/Secondary Development, which warranted the separation of the units. She added the Schmidt residence was the only Primary/Secondary lot 1 in the area. It had originally been zoned for six units, then was down zoned. Stephen Richards, original architect of the Schmidt residence, presented a drawing of the site showing topographical detail, and discussed design guidelines. He explained the current situation at the Schmidt residence involved a very steep site and an existing single family residence on a Primary/Secondary .lot. His letter dated February 25, 1992, stated he interpreted Ordinance 18.54.050(1) to say units may be separated if site constraints existed. Following discussion about duplexing, slopes, density issues, and the definition of site constraints, Tom Steinberg moved to uphold the DRB decision denying the applicant's request and to reaffirm the DRB's interpretation of the ordinance. Merv Lapin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 7 was a presentation by Herb Roth, Roth & Shepard Architects, regarding the Police Department space expansion issue. He recalled previous discussions, and said the options had been narrowed to two: "Scheme B", a 9,000 square foot addition to existing space; or "Scheme C", a 17,000 square foot new facility. Jim Gibson asked if there were any compromises between the two schemes. Herb felt there was not, saying the compromises already reviewed would cast considerably more than either Scheme B or C. After further discussion about the cost of the project and what priority the project would take, Jim Gibson moved to accept Scheme C. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-2, Peggy Osterfoss and Merv Lapin opposed. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:~MINMAR17.92 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Gommunity Development Department' DATE: March 9, 1992 SUBJECT: A request to amend Section 18.34, Parking .Zone District of the Vail Municipal Code to allow construction staging as a conditional use. Applicants: Vail Associates/Sonnenalp Properties Planner: Andy Knudtsen I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The request made by the applicant, Johannes Faessler, is to amend Chapter 18.34, Parking District, of the Vail Municipal Code to include temporary construction staging as a conditional use. Chapter 18.34 regulates the Parking Zone District for the Town. The three sites within the Town which have this zoning include the Lionshead Parking Structure, the parking lot east of the Garden of the Gods (underlying zoning for a portion of the SDD), and the West Day Lot owned by Vail Associates. II. BACKGROUND The applicant plans to renovate the Bavaria Haus during the summers of 1992 and 1993. This extensive renovation will require a staging area that is off-site. In the past, other redevelopment projects in the Village have used the upper bench of Ford Park as a staging area. Because of the increased use and development of the park in recent years, the Town is no longer allowing private contractors to use the park for staging. Staff has worked with the architect for the Sonnenalp Hotel, Ken O'Bryan, to try to identify a site for staging which would be compatible with adjacent uses. After reviewing several sites, the applicant was successful in negotiating an agreement with Vail Associates for the use of the West Day Lot, adjacent to the Marriott in Lionshead. However, before staging can take place on that lot, the zoning code must be amended to include construction staging as a conditional use. Following that amendment process, the applicant must receive an approved conditional use permit. III. PROPOSED CODE LANGUAGE Below is all of the text included in Chapter 18:34, Parking District. The proposed text is shaded in grey. 18.34.010 -Purpose The parking district. is intended to provide sites for private or public unstructured off-street vehicle parking and conditionally to provide for private or public off- 1 r street vehicle parking structures and private or public parks and recreational facilities. The parking district is intended to allow such 'Uses while ensuring adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each valid use in adjacent areas. (Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.100.) 18:34.020 -Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in the P district: Private or public unstructured off-street vehicle parking. (Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.200.) 18.34.030 -Conditional Uses The following conditional uses shall be permitted subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60: A. Private or public off-street vehicle parking structures; B. Private or public parks and recreational facilitiesF C. Public uses, private office and commercial uses that are transportation; tourist or town related and that are accessory to a parking structure:; D. Major arcade:`; E ~'~mporary construot~on stagrng area ..,For the purposes ofi this paragraph, a temporary construction staging site sha11 mean a srte on vuhich, #or a temporary period t~ma, construction matpr~als, heavy eonstruct~on equipment, yehielps and cprstruct~on trailerg ma,y be stored (Ord. 6(1982) § 2a: Ord. 33(1981) § 1: Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.300.) 18.34.040 -Accessory Uses A. Minor arcade. (Ord. 6(1982) § 2b: Ord. 33(1981) § 1: Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.400. ) IV. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHANGE With the addition of temporary construction staging as a conditional review in this zone district, staff believes it may help facilitate redevelopment within the Town. In the past, some projects which have been renovated have used Town-owned land for the staging area. Now that the Ford Park site is no longer available, staff believes another option should be provided. This proposal would offer an alternative for staging, but would not create uncontrollable impacts. The change in the zoning code, as it is proposed, will allow the construction staging only as a conditional use. Therefore, the Planning and Environmental Commission will always have the opportunity to review any proposed staging site. During the review, the PEC can place conditions on the request to ensure the proposed use will be compatible with adjacent properties, if the proposed amendment is approved. The Sonnenalp is planning to return to the PEC on April 13, 1992 for a conditional use hearing on the West Day Lot site. 2 V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Given the fact that this use is allowed only after approval of the conditional review, staff believes the code change will have few, if any, unmitigated negative impacts. The positive effects are that the Town will be providing an option for construction staging to those who undertake large renovation projects in the Town, while also allowing for PEC review to ensure the community is not negatively impacted. c:\pec\so nenalp\zonecode.309 3 1 ~ ORDINANCE NO. 4 Series of 1992 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 18.34 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING CONSTRUCTION STAGING SITES AS A CONDITIONAL USE. WHEREAS, the Town has the need to provide for the temporary storage of construction materials, heavy construction equipment, vehicles and construction trailers to facilitate large construction projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1 Section 18.34 of the Vail Municipal Code be repealed and reenacted to read as follows: 18.34.010 -Purpose The parking district is intended to provide sites for private or public unstructured off-street vehicle parking an conditionally to provide for private or public off-street vehicle parking structures and private or public parks and recreational facilities. The parking district is intended to allow such ~ :es fti;ilitias while ensuring adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each valid use in adjacent areas. (Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.100.) 18.34.020 -Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in the P district: Private or public unstructured off-street vehicle parking. (Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.200.) 18.34.030 -Conditional Uses The following conditional uses shall be permitted subject to issuance of a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60: A. Private or public off-street vehicle parking structures; 6. Private or public parks and recreational facilities:'r C. Public uses, private office and commercial uses that are transportation, tourist or town related and that are accessory to a parking structure.-' D. Major arcade.-, 1 Temporary ~onstr~ction stagrng sites.;;: for?.the ;purposes of this paragraph';<;a .;empor,~ry~on~tru:ctfion stagrng site shall mean a site on uvf'ie~i forr a temporary perrod n;tirr~ oonstruction materials, heavy construction>equrpment, uehlefes .and onst'~~ettc~r~trai;f~r~~a "~sto'rgd .................................................:::::..y......:::.:::::::::::::::::::::: (Ord. 6(1982) § 2a: Ord. 33(1981) § 1: Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8{1973) § 24.300.) 18.34.040 -Accessory Uses A. Minor arcade. (Ord. 6(1982) § 2b: Ord. 33(1981) § 1: Ord. 2(1976) § 3 (part): Ord. 8(1973) § 24.400.) Section 2 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5 All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. 2 INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the day of , 1992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. 5 SERIES 1992 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 9, SECTION 5 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 9.54 - RESTRICTIONS ON THE POSSESSION OF GLASS CONTAINERS. WHEREAS, taking glass containers and bottles onto the public parks and athletic fields within the Town of Vail has caused a safety and litter problem. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. Title 9, Section 5 -Offenses Against Property - is hereby amended by the addition of Chapter 9:54 -Restrictions on Glass Containers to read as follows: Section 9.53.010 -Restrictions on Glass Containers Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, it shall be unlawful for any person to: a) Enter or remain any Town of Vail park or Town of Vail athletic field in the possion of a glass bottle or glass container. 9.454.020 -Exceptions a) Glass containers and bottles shah be permitted on the premises of any liquor licensed establishment. b) Glass bottles and glass containers shall be permitted on the premises of any event which has obtained a special events liquor license. 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent 1 I ~ herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 7th day of April, 1992, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C:\ORD92.5 2 v.:j ~ . ORDINANCE NO. 7 SERIES 1992 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TOWN OF VAIL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAINI POLICIES AND GUIDELINES; ESTABLISHING A BOARD FOR THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING PROPOSED PUBLIC ARTWORK FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, it is the Town Council's opinion that the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Town of Vail would be enhanced by the establishment of an Art in Public Places program setting forth policies and guidelines relating to the funding, reviewing, purchasing, and deaccessioning of art to be placed on public property; and WHEREAS, in order to administer the Art in Public Places program, the Town Council, in accordance with Section 8.6 of the Charter of the Town of Vail wishes to create and Art in Public Places Board. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado that: Title 2 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Section 2.26 -Public Art Program, to read as follow: Section 2.26.010 The Town Council of the Town of Vail hereby adopts the Art in Public Places program including the Art in Public Places program policies and guidelines dated July 1989 and as they may be amended from time to time by resolution of the Town Council. Section 2.26.020 The Town Council hereby appoints the Town of Vail Arts Board composed of eight (8) members who shall act in accordance with the Charter, this Chapter, the direction of the Town Council, the ordinances of the Town of Vail, and shall be appointed and serve as provided in this Chapter. Section 2.26.030 -Members - Appointments -Terms The Arts Board shall consist of eight (8) members appointed by the Town Council which shall include six (6) members at large, one (1) Town Council members, and one (1) Planning and Environmental Commission member. In addition, the Arts Board may consist of honorary advisory members who shall not have the power to vote on issues which come before the Board. The number and term of such advisory members shall be at the discretion of the Town Council. All members of the Arts Board shall be individuals who have demonstrated expertise in architecture, art criticism, art education, art history, foreign arts, graphic arts, interior design, landscape architecture, town planning, or other art and design related fields, or who have demonstrated a 1 strong interest in the visual arts and civic improvement. All members shall either be residents of the Town of Vail, or own property within the Town of Vail, or own a business, or be employed within the Town of Vail. The terms of the members of the Art Board shall be for three (3) years. Section 2.26.040 -Removal from Office Members of the Arts Board shall serve at the will of the Town Council and shall be subject to removal by the Town Council for inefficiency, neglect of duty, failure to attend meetings, malfeasance in office, or any other reasons the Town Council deems proper. Section 2.26.050 -Vacancy Vacancies on the Arts Board shall occur whenever a member of the Art Board is removed by the Town Council, dies, becomes incapacitated and unable to perform his or her duties for a period of sixty (60} days, resigns, ceases to meet the qualifications for Arts Board members, or is convicted of a felony. Vacancies shall be filled by a majority vote at the Town Council. Section 2.26.060 -Officers -Meetings -Rules The Arts Board shall elect as Chairman from among the members and shall fill such other offices as they may determine. The Chairman shall not be a member of the Town Council, the Design Review Board, or the Planning and Environmental Commission. The term of the Chairman shall be for one (1) year, with eligibility for re-election for one (1) additional term. The Arts Board shall meet as it determines to be necessary, and its meetings shall be in accordance with Roberts Rules of Procedure unless it adopts other rules for the transaction of business. The Board shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, findings, and determinations. Section 2.26.070 -Function of the Arts Board The Arts Board's functions shall include without limitation: a) To promote and encourage the development and public awareness of any interest in the fine and performing arts in the Town of Vail; b) To advise the Town Council in connection with all matters relating to the artistic and cultural development of the Town; c) To perform such other functions associated with the arts as the Town Council may, from time to time, direct; d) To assist in the preparation of applications for grants or other sources of funding funding for arts programs for the Town; e) To administer the Town arts program, its policies and guidelines. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and 2 each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. All bylaws, orders, .resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 7th day of April, 1992, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C:\ORD92.7 3 ~ ' MEMORANDUM r TO: Planning and Environmental Commission 4 FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 23, 1992 SUBJECT: A request for the establishment of a Special Development District at the 'Christiania at Vail, 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot P-3, Block 5-A, Vail Village .Fifth Filing. Applicant: Paul Johnston Planner: Mike Mollica I. INTRODUCTION Paul Johnston, owner and operator. of the Christiania at Vail, has filed a request for the establishment of a Special Development District, for his property located at 356 Hanson Ranch Road. The purpose for this SDD establishment is to allow for the expansion and redevelopment of the existing Christiania Lodge. The Christiania at Vail has an existing, Town approved development plan. This development plan was approved by the Planning and Environmental Commission on April 8, 1991. This approval granted a setback variance in order to allow for the expansion of the Christiania Lodge's lobby and a 44 sq. ft. expansion of GRFA (on the proposed fourth floor), into the setback. This setback variance is valid until April 8, 1992. Subsequent to this PEC approval of the variance, the Design Review Board, on June 5, 1991, unanimously approved the final design for the Christiania redevelopment. This redevelopment included the expansion of the existing lobby, the addition of mechanical space beneath the lobby, and the addition of a new fourth floor, which included two new dwelling units. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant's redevelopment proposal generally includes the upgrade and renovation of the existing Christiania Lodge, as follows: • The addition of a new fourth floor on the existing structure, which would consist of two dwelling units. • A general reconfiguration of the existing first, second and third floors of the Lodge, by reconfiguring accommodation units, adding dwelling units as well as common area. A total of 21 accommodation units and 3 dwelling units, comprising 14,117 sq. ft. of GRFA, is proposed. • The expansion of the existing Sarah's Bar, from 774 sq. ft. to 1,171 sq. ft. in size (an increase of 397 sq. ft.). • The construction of a garage which would provide two on-site covered parking spaces. The garage would be located at the southwest corner of the building. Additional GRFA would be located over the garage area, on floors two, three and four. ' 1 t • The construction of 19 valet (surface) parking spaces, to be located on the adjacent Parcel P-3, to the north. This parking area would be surfaced with asphalt, and would be landscaped around its perimeter. • The restriction of one of the three dwelling units, according to the Condominium Conversion section of the zoning code. • The provision of one off-site, permanently restricted employee housing unit. • The construction of a walking path, along the east side of Mill Creek (this will require approval from Vail Associates, owner of the tract). The existing split rail fence, located adjacent to Mill Creek, would be removed, as would the approximately 550 sq. ft. of asphalt area, currently used for parking and the trash dumpster. The relocation and enclosure of the trash dumpster, to the northwest corner of the Christiania property. • Additional landscaping would be added on and adjacent to the Mill Creek stream tract (which is owned by Vail Associates) and adjacent to the recreation path. • The screen fence located around the swimming pool would be relocated onto the Christiania Lodge's property, (it is currently on the stream tract). • Of the seven proposed fireplaces, six are proposed to be gas. The existing woodburning fireplace located in Sarah's Bar will remain woodburning. III. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY A. May 11, 1987 -the Planning and Environmental Commission voted to approve density and setback variances in order to allow for the construction of additions to the Christiania Lodge. Subsequent to the 1987 PEC approval of the variance request, no construction has occurred. B. March 6, 1991 - a redevelopment proposal which did not require any variance/PEC approvals was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board (DRB). Under this redevelopment proposal, the applicant proposed to add a new fourth floor to the existing structure to accommodate 2 new dwelling units, to remodel the structure's interior, to construct a walking path along Mill Creek, to screen the existing dumpster, to pave and landscape the eastern half of the northern parking lot (when ownership and rights to this lot are resolved), and to remove a portion of an existing asphalted area adjacent to the proposed Mill Creek walking path. C. April 8, 1991 -the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously approved a setback variance for the Christiania Lodge in order to allow for the expansion of the Lodge's lobby and a 44 sq. ft. expansion of GRFA (on the proposed fourth floor), into the front setback area. D. June 5, 1991 -the Design Review Board unanimously granted final design approval for the redevelopment of the Christiania Lodge, as approved by the PEC on April 8, 1991. 2 IV. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS Zone District: Public Accommodation Site Area: 0.380 acres or 16,553 sq. ft. The following zoning analysis highlights the SDD's departures, from the PA zone district, by the use of bold type: Underlying Zoning ~Z Existing Protect 1991 Approval 1992 SDD A. Density (25 DUs per 9 DUs 2 DUs and 25 AUs 2 DUs and 14 AUs 3 DUs and 21 AUs .13.5 buildable acre: 1 DU . 2 _ '14.5 DUs = 9 DUs DUs AUs) B. AU GRFA' N/A 6,720 sq. ft. ~ 7,850 sq. ft. 7,335 sq. ft. DU GRFA' N/A 1,082 sq. ft. 4,453 sq. ft. 5,041 sq. ft. Excess Common N/A 145 sq. ft. 1,021 sq. ft. 1,741 sq. ft. C. Total GRFA' (80% of 13,242 sq. ft. 7,802 sq. ft. 13,324 sq. ft. 14,117 sq. ft. the buildable sfte area) (80%) (47%) (80%) (85%) D. Common Area (35% of 4,635 sq. ft. 4,780 sq. ft. 5,656 sq. ft. 6,376 sq. ft. the allowable GRFA) (35%) (36%) (43%) (48%) E. Accessory (10°i° oz 1,324 sq. ft. 774 sq. ft. 774 sq. ft. 1,171 sq. ft. constructed GRFA) (10%) (10%) (6%) (8%) F. Office N/A 72 sq. ft. (approved 197 sq. ft. 197 sq. ft. by conditional use in (approved by 1989) conditional use in 1989) G. Gross Area" N/A ~ 13,428 sq. ft. 18,930 sq. ft. 20,574 sq. ft. H. Setbacks 20 ft. all sides North/Front 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" East Side 0'-0" 0'-0" 0'-0" West Side 17'-0" 17'-0" 10'-0" South/Rear 8'-6" (deck) 8'-6" 8'-6" I. Site Coverage (55% of 9,104 sq. ft. 5,235 sq. ft. 5,738 sq. ft.. 6,450 sq. ft. site area) (55%) ~ (32%) ,.~t5%) (39%) J. Landscaping (30% of 4,966 sq. ft. 7,490 sq. ft. 5,943 sq. ft. 5,356 sq. ft. site area) (30%) (45%) (36%) (32%) K. Height 48 ft. sloping roof/ 36 ft. sloping 43 ft. flat 44 ft. flat 45 ft. flat roof L. Parking Spaces Required N/A 36 34 41 Spaces Required/ N/A 33 33 33 Non-Conforming"' Spaces Provided N/A :3 3 25 ' For comparison purposes, all GRFA calculations were completed using the Town's 1992 definition of GRFA. " Gross area calculations include AU GRFA, DU GRFA, common, accessory, office and garage areas. Spaces required/non-conforming are the "grandfathered" parking spaces as discussed in Section V,C of this memo. 3 V: SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CRITERIA The criteria to be used to evaluate this proposal are the 9 Special Development District (SDD) development standards set forth in the special development district chapter of the Zoning Code.. The criteria are as follows: A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the Immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, Identity, character, visual Integrity and orientation. It is the staff's opinion that the proposed redevelopment of the Christiania Lodge will be compatible with the existing land uses surrounding the project. We believe that the proposed mass and bulk for this structure is .acceptable, given the existing footprint of the Christiania Lodge, and the adjacent Chateau Condominiums. The project would have a maximum height of 44 feet, which is just slightly under the maximum allowable height of the PA zone district. Additionally, the proposed height would also be within the acceptable limits as outlined in the Vail Village Master Plan, which recommends that this property have a maximum height range of 3-4 stories in height (27-36 feet, excluding roof). This project has been analyzed according to the proposed Frivolous Sals View Corridor. This view corridor was approved by the Town Council on first reading, on May 7, 1991, with the stipulation that any previously approved projects could be built, even though they may encroach into the view corridor. At the time of first reading, it was anticipated that the Christiania redevelopment would encroach into this view corridor. Since the 1991 approval of the Christiania redevelopment, there have been some slight design modifications which would affect the proposed Frivolous Sals View Corridor. Changes to the roof configuration on the northwest corner of the Christiania Lodge would create an additional encroachment into the corridor. However, the northernmost portion of the building would be pulled out of the proposed view corridor. Overall, the staff believes the applicant's proposal is reasonable, given the fact that the Frivolous Sals View Corridor has not been formally adopted upon second reading. Although the proposed SDD would exceed the maximum allowable GRFA by 875 sq: ft., it should be noted that 1,741 sq. ft. of GRFA is directly attributable to "excess" common area. The common areas in the Lodge include the mechanical areas, the hallways, stairs, storage areas, lobby and hotel offices. It should also be noted that the residential part of the GRFA, which constitutes 12,376 sq. ft., is actually under the maximum allowable GRFA, as designated in the PA zone district. Please refer to Exhibit A for a detailed breakdown of the proposed GRFA. B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Under the proposed redevelopment scenario, the applicant will be reducing the overall density of the proposed project by one dwelling unit. This is in contrast with the existing project, which has a total of 14.5 dwelling units. In summary, a total of three 4 i dwellina units and twenty-one accommodation units are proposed with this SDD. As indicated in Section IV(D) of this memorandum, the Vail Village Master Plan encourages the provision of short term, overnight hotel rooms (accommodation units). The proposed Christiania SDD is in compliance with the definition of "Lodge", in which "the gross residential floor area devoted to accommodation units exceeds the gross residential floor area devoted to dwelling units." As further indicated in the attached Exhibit A, the GRFA devoted to accommodation units exceeds 59% of the total GRFA for the project. Because this SDD request exceeds the maximum allowable density for the PA zone district, the applicant has agreed to restrict the third floor dwelling unit according to Section 17.26.075 -Condominium Conversion, of the Town's zoning code. This section of the code includes rental restrictions and generally provides that condominium units shall be included in the short term rental market for certain periods of time. Staff believes placing the rental restriction on only one of the three dwelling units is acceptable because the applicant is reducing the overall density of the project by one dwelling unit (versus the existing project), and the fact that the GRFA exceedance is due to the overage of common areas. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to provide one off-site, permanently restricted employee dwelling unit. This unit would be the secondary unit in a primary/secondary residence owned by the applicant. The restricted employee unit will be located at 1184 Cabin Circle/Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Valley First Filing. Although this SDD proposal would provide four less accommodation units then the existing project (21 versus 25), staff believes that when the Christiania Special Development District is reviewed iii its entirety, the project meets the SDD criteria. There are public benefits, such as the employee restricted dwelling unit, the Mill Creek walking path, additional landscaping, two enclosed parking spaces, a paved parking area, etc., which should be considered. We believe the project provides a workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity as described above. C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.52. This SDD proposal calls for the addition of a two-car garage, (to be located in the southwest corner of the proposed addition), two surface parking spaces to be provided immediately north of the garage, and.two surface parking spaces north of the lobby (on-site). Additionally, the applicant is proposing 19 valet (surface) parking spaces on the adjacent Lot P-3, north of Hanson Ranch Road (please see the attached site plan). The proposed parking area on Lot P-3 would be surfaced with asphalt, would include landscaping around its perimeter, and a retaining wall on the west side of the lot. With this SDD, the total number of proposed parking spaces would be 25. 5 Existing 1992 SDD Use ~ # Spaces Required # Spaces Required Accommodation Units: (25 AUs) = 16.4 (21 AUs) = 15.6 Dwelling Units: (2 DUs)= 4.0 (3 DUs) = 7.0 . Accessory (Sarah's Lounge): 6.0 8.5 Realty Office: 0.3 0.8 Christian Chateau Townhomes: 9.0 9.0 Sub-T®tal 35.7 40.9 Grandfathered Spaces -32.7 -32.7 Grand Total 3.0* 8.2.9.0 'The Town of Vail recognizes that the Christiania Lodge has 3 existing parking spaces. These three parking spaces are located on the Christiania Lodge site and are considered legal, nonconforming spaces due to their location within the required front setback. . In summary. this SDD requires that a total of 6 new parkina spaces be provided on- site. The applicant is proposing a total of 25 parking spaces for the project, 22 of which are new. However, the proposed parking plan deviates from the parking requirements of the PA zone district as follows: 1. The parking is not provided entirely on-site. 2. 75% of the required parking is not located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view. 3. The on-site surface parking spaces would be located within the front setback area. The Christiania is technically 32.7 parking spaces short, as required per the zoning code. However, the proposed SDD will meet the incremental increase of required parking with the P-3 parking lot, the on-site valet parking and the proposed garage. Historically, the Christiania has parked on portions of the property to the north (Lot J), . however, this arrangement has not been officially recognized by. the Town. Given the siting of the existing Christiania Lodge,~and the fact that the applicant has a perpetual easement to park on the adjacent Lot P-3, staff believes the applicant's proposed parking scheme is acceptable, and will be an improvement over the existing parking configuration. . Also, according to Section 18.52.060 of the Town's Zoning Code, "the Town Council may permit off-site or jointly used parking facilities if located within three hundred feet of the use served". This provision only applies to unenclosed parking spaces. The staff believes it is appropriate to recognize that the P-3 parking is formally associated with the project. 6 J Loading: The existing Christiania Lodge has a requirement for one loading berth. No loading berths are currently provided for the Lodge, and the loading requirement is considered "grandfathered". The proposed redevelopment of the Lodge does not increase the loading non-conformity, as the new proposal also has a requirement for one loading berth. The proposed parking scheme, on the adjacent Lot P-3, does require that the entry to the parking area be relocated approximately 25 feet to the east. This relocated entry does provide for safer ingress and egress out of Lot P-3, and also allows for the safer passage of vehicles utilizing the Mill Creek Court "chute". However, this relocated entry would remove one of the existing public loading and delivery spaces along Hanson Ranch Road. The loss of one public loading/delivery space in the Village Core is not a positive change and it is a major concern to the staff, however, we acknowledge that the applicant does have a right to safely access Lot P-3. To mitigate the loss of the one loading/delivery space, the applicant will provide a loading/delivery berth on-site (adjacent to the dumpster), for use by the Christiania. D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan, Town policies and Urban Design Plans. It is staff's opinion that the proposed redevelopment meets the goals and objectives of the Vail Village Master Plan. The Master Plan emphasizes the upgrading of lodges, the improvement of the pedestrian experience, as well as the enhancement of open space. This proposal supports the Master Plan's objectives by the addition of 7 new accommodation units (versus the 1991 approval) and by improving and expanding the existing lobby and bar areas, while generally complying with the Town's site development standards, except as noted in the memo. Additionally, the proposed Mill Creek pedestrian path will enhance open space for use by the public. The following is a list of the Vail Village Master Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies which relate to this project: GOAL #1 - ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY REDEVELOPMENT WHILE PRESERVING THE UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OF THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN ITS SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND IDENTITY. 1.2 Objective: Encourage the upgrading and redevelopment of residential and commercial facilities. 1.3 Objective: Enhance new development and redevelopment through public improvements done by private developers working in cooperation with the Town. ~f 1.3.1 Objective: Public improvements shall be developed with the participation of the private sector working with the Town. GOAL #2 - TO FOSTER A STRONG TOURIST INDUSTRY AND PROMOTE YEAR-AROUND ECONOMIC HEALTH AND VIABILITY FOR THE VILLAGE AND FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. 2.3 Objective: Increase the number of residential units available for short term overnight accommodations. 2.3.1 P®licy: The development of short term accommodation units is strongly encouraged. Residential units that are developed above existing density levels are required to be designed or managed in a manner that makes them available for short term overnight rental. 2.4.2 Policy: Activity that provides night life and evening entertainment for both the guest and the community shall be encouraged. 2.5 Objective: Encourage the continued upgrading, renovation and maintenance of existing lodging and commercial facilities to better serve the needs of our guests. 2.6 Objective: Encourage the development of affordable housing units through the efforts of the private sector. 2.6.1 Policy: ' Employee housing units may be required as part of any new or redevelopment project requesting density over that allowed by existing zoning. 2.6.2 Policy: Employee housing shall be developed with appropriate restrictions so as to insure their availability and affordability to the local work force. GOAL #3 - TO RECOGNIZE AS A TOP PRIORITY THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE WALKING EXPERIENCE THROUGHOUT THE VILLAGE. 3.1 Objective: Physically improve the existing pedestrian ways by landscaping and other improvements. 8 1 3.4 Objectives: Develop additional sidewalks, pedestrian-only walkways and accessible green space areas, including pocket parks and stream access. GOAL #4 - TO PRESERVE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AREAS AND EXPAND GREENSPACE OPPORTUNITIES. The Vail Village Master Plan sub-area concepts which directly relates to this redevelopment proposal are Concepts No. 3-8, Mill Creek Streamwalk, and Concept No. 7-1, Christiania/VA Study Area: #3-8 Mill Creek Streamwalk A walking only path along Mill Creek between Pirate Ship Park and Gore Creek, further completing the pedestrian network and providing public access to the creek. Specific design and location shall be sensitive to adjacent uses and the creek environment. , #7-1 Christiania/VA Studv Area Presently zoned for lodging, this parcel currently provides parking for the Christiania Lodge and Vail Associates. Issues to 6e addressed in the development of this property include covenants restricting the use of this property to parking, accommodation of existing parking as well as demand created by new development and a formally adopted view corridor, looking toward the Gore Range. Public purpose uses that may be appropriate for this site include park/open space and/or a central loading and delivery facility for the Village core. The staff believes that the applicant's proposal to utilize Lot P-3 for surface parking will not prohibit the potential future use of the Lot P-3 as discussed above in the Master Plan. The Vail Village Urban Design Guide Plan addresses this proposal through Sub-Area Concept No. 8: "Mill Creek walking path, west side Mill Creek. Path completes linkage from pirate ship and mountain path to Gore Creek Drive." The Vail Village Master Plan and The Urban Design Guide Plan both call for the construction of a pedestrian path connection between the bike path and Hanson Ranch Road. The addition of a foot path would be a positive improvement to the pedestrian experience in the Village area. Even though the Urban Design Guide Plan calls for the path to be located on the west side of Mill Creek, staff believes that the east side provides a more attractive walking experience. The west side of the creek has a trash room for Cyrano's, as well as several utility boxes,~which make it an unpleasant area to walk through. 9 In further support of the above sub-area concepts, the applicant has committed to remove approximately 550 sq. ft. of asphalt area adjacent to Mill Creek. This paved area, which is currently used by the Christiania for parking and dumpster storage, is located on Vail Associates and Christiania owned property. This proposal was reviewed according to the recently adopted Streetscape Master Plan. There are no specific streetscape concepts which apply to this site, however, the Plan does propose a sidewalk on the west side of the Mill Creek Court Chute. It is the staff's position that the installation of this sidewalk should not be a requirement of the Christiania redevelopment as we believe the SDD will not directly impact the pedestrian movements in this area. E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property on which the special development district is proposed. There are no natural and/or geologic hazards which would affect this property and/or redevelopment proposal. The project is also located out of the established 100-year • floodplain. F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The existing front setback is 15 feet due to the encroachment of the northwest corner of the Lodge. Currently, the west side setback is 17 feet due to an encroachment of the southwest corner of the building into the 20-foot setback. The existing rear setback is 8'-6", as the existing Sarah's deck projects 11'-6" into the 20-foot rear setback (see attached site plan). An existing legal, non-conforming east side setback of zero feet results from the Christiania's connection to the Chateau condominiums. By adding a new fourth floor, 44 square feet of additional GRFA will be added into the side setback. At the tightest point, the west setback will be reduced from the existing 17 feet, down to 10'-0", with the addition of the two-car garage. The second and third floors (GRFA) would encroach 4'-6" into the setback and the fourth floor (GRFA) would encroach 2'- 9" into the setback. Because the zoning code and the Vail Village Master Plan both encourage the construction of covered parking, and the fact that this portion of the site is very heavily screened from adjacent properties, staff is able to support the applicant's request to further encroach into the required 20-foot setback. G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation. The proposed Christiania redevelopment will.have a minimal impact on the existing vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems adjacent to the Christiania Lodge property. The proposed parking scheme, on the adjacent Lot P-3, does require that the entry to the parking area be relocated approximately 25 feet to the east. This relocated entry does provide for safer ingress and egress out of Lot P-3, and also 10 • allows for the safer passage of vehicles utilizing the Mill Creek Court "chute". However, this relocated entry would remove one of the existing loading and delivery spaces along Hanson Ranch Road. H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions. As indicated on the attached site plan, there are some existing large, mature evergreens located very close to the existing Lodge. The redevelopment proposal calls for the removal, and relocation, of nine of these large evergreen trees. The applicant has proposed to add nine new aspens (3" caliper) adjacent to the Mill Creek stream tract (to screen the on-site parking) and near the recreation path. Six new aspens (3" caliper) will be added adjacent to the front, or north, entry to the Lodge. To further open up the Mill Creek stream tract, the applicant has agreed to remove the existing split rail fence which is located upon the Vail Associates' owned stream tract. The wood screen fence around the swimming pool will be relocated upon the Lodge's property, as it is currently located upon the stream tract (Tract E). The staff feels that the landscaping design is positive because of the applicant's proposal to relocate all nine of the large evergreens and to add the 15 new aspens on site. The relocated evergreens would be placed in the adjacent stream tract, and this relocation effort would be coordinated with the Town Landscape Architect and Vail Associates. Should these relocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, the applicant has agreed to replace any dead or dying tree with an 8-10' evergreen. Additional off-site landscaping will be added around the perimeter of Lot P-3. This landscaping would consist of 17 new evergreens (6-8' in height), and 10 Potentilla shrubs along the base of the proposed retaining wall (on the Mill Creek Court Chute). (According to the zoning code, the off-site landscaping can not be included in the required landscaping.) I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special development district. The applicant has proposed that the SDD redevelopment plan for the Christiania Lodge be completed at one time. No phasing plan is proposed. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION We believe that the Christiania redevelopment meets the criteria for the establishment of a SDD, as discussed above. The staff recommendation for the proposed establishment of a Special Development District for the Christiania Lodge is for approval.. The applicant has incorporated the following elements into the proposed development plan: 11 1. The proposed dwelling unit, to be located on the third floor of the Lodge, will be v restricted according to Section 17.26.075 -Condominium Conversion, of the Town of Vail Zoning Code. 2. One employee dwelling unit, which shall be provided with a full kitchen (refrigerator, stove, sink, oven or microwave), will be permanently restricted as an employee dwelling unit, per Section 18.13.080(B)(10)(b-d) of the Town of Vail Zoning Code, prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits for this redevelopment. 3. The applicant will obtain a revocable right-of-way permit from the Towri in order to add the proposed landscaping at the entrance to the Lot P-3 parking area. 4. Prior to the Town's issuance of any building permits for this redevelopment, the Town Engineer must grant final approval for the P-3 parking design. The Town Engineer is concerned with the design of the proposed retaining wall adjacent to the Mill Creek Court "Chute". A curb and gutter section may be necessary to accommodate drainage in this area. 5. The applicant has agreed that should any of the relocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, such tree shall be replaced with an 8-10' evergreen on a one-to-one ratio. 12 0 Exhibit A GRFA and Parking Required GRFA Parking 1. First Level 6 AUs = 1,932 sq. ft. = 4.332 Office (197 sq. ft./250) = 0.788 2. Second Level 7 AUs = 2,431 sq. ft. _ 5.173 Sarah's Bar (1,020/15/8) = 8.5 3. Third Level 8 AUs = 2,972 sq. ft. = 6.146 1 DU = 551 sq. ft. = 2.0 4. Fourth Level 2 DUs = 4,490 sq. ft. = 5.000 5. Christian Chateau Townhomes = 9.000 Total GRFA: 12,376 sq. ft. = 40.939 - 32.70 (Grandfathered spaces) 8.239 = 9 Required spaces Total GRFA: 12,376 sq. ft. . Excess Common Area: + 1,741 sg. ft. Grand Total: 14,117 sq. ft. Total Density: 21 AUs and 3 DUs AU GRFA = 7,335 sq. ft., or 59% of the total GRFA DU GRFA . 5,041 sq. ft., or 41% of the total GRFA 13 Exhibit B Common Area First Level = 3,104 sq. ft. Second Level = 1,785 sq. ft. Third Levei = 727 sq. ft. Fourth Level = 760 sa. ft Total: 6,376 sq. ft. Allowable GRFA = 13,242 sq. ft. x .35 (35%) - 4,635 sq. ft. 6,376 sq. ft. - 4,635 sa. ft. 1,741 sq. ft. -excess common (added to GRFA) - 14 r' ~ ORDINANCE NO. 8 Series of 1992 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 28, CHRISTIANIA AT VAIL; ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 28 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.40 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code authorizes Special Development Districts within the Town in order to encourage flexibility in the development of land; and WHEREAS, application has been made for Special Development District approval for a certain parcel of property within the Town, legally described as Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing, and Lot P-3, Block 5-A, Vail Village Fifth Filing; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 18.66.140, the Planning and Environmental Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SDD, and has submitted a recommendation for approval to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, all notices as required by Section 18.66.080 have been sent to the appropriate parties; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public hearing as required by Chapter 18.66 of the Vail Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1 The Town Council finds that all the procedures for Special Development Districts in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail have been fully satisfied. Section 2 The Town Council finds that the development plan for Special Development District No. 28 meets each of the standards set forth in Section 18.40.080 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail or demonstrates that either one or more of them is not applicable, or that a practical solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. In accordance with Section 18.40.040, the development plan for Special Development District No. 28 is approved. The development plan is comprised of those plans submitted by Pierce, Segerberg 8~ Spaeh Architects, and consists of the following documents: 1 I 4p 1. Sheet No. A1, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (site plan). ` 2. Sheet Nos. A2-A5, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (first, second, third and fourth floor plans). 3. Sheet No. A6, dated January 27, 1992 (roof plan). 4. Sheet Nos. A7-A9, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 16, 1992 (North, South, East and West elevations). 5. Sheet No. L1, dated January 27, 1992 and revised March 6 and March 16, 1992 (landscape plan). 6. Parking Plan for Lot P-3, dated February 8, 1992 and revised February 18, 1992 and March 16, 1992. 7. North elevation of lobby, dated April 22, 1991. Section 3 The Town Council finds that any deviation of the development standards from the underlying zone district provides benefits to the Town that outweigh the adverse effects of such deviation. The development standards for Special Development District No. 28 are approved by the Town Council as a part of the approved development plan as follows: A. SETBACKS: Setbacks shall be as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. B. HEIGHT: Building height, for a sloping roof, shall not exceed 48 feet from existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive; or for a flat or mansard roof, shall not exceed 45 feet from existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive. C. DENSITY: Development in SDD No. 28 shall be limited to a maximum of 3 dwelling units and 21 accommodation units, as designated on the floor plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance, and as follows: ~1. The Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be limited to a maximum of 14,117 sq. ft., of which 7,335 sq. ft shall be dedicated to accommodation units, 5,041 sq. ft. shall be dedicated to dwelling units and 1,741 sq. ft. 2 shall be dedicated to excess common area. It should also be noted that the provision for an additional 425 sq. ft. of GRFA, which is applicable to certain zone districts, does not apply to this Special Development District. 2. The applicant or his successors in interest agree to permanently restrict one off-site dwelling unit, (the secondary unit in a primary/secondary residence located at 1184 Cabin Circle/Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Valley First Filing, for use by employees of the Upper Eagle Valley (employee housing unit) in the following manner: a. The employee housing unit shall be provided with a full kitchen (refrigerator, stove, sink, oven/microwave) and shall not be leased or rented for any period less than 30 consecutive days and shall be rented only to tenants who are full time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. b. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be deemed to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Eagle-Vail and Avon and their surrounding areas. c. A full-time employee is a person who works an average of thirty hours per week. d. The applicant or his successors in interest shall file a declaration of covenants and restrictions with the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure the restrictions set forth herein shall run with the land. Said declaration shall not be amended or terminated without the written approval of the Town of Vail. Subsequent to the effective date of this ordinance, no building permit shall be issued for the redevelopment of this Special Development District No. 28 until said declaration of covenants and restrictions are executed and filed with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. 3. The applicant or his successors in interest agree to permanently restrict one on-site dwelling unit, (the third floor dwelling unit in the Christiania Lodge) located at 356 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot D, Block 2, Vail Village First Filing, according to Section 17.26.075 -Condominium Conversion, of 3 the Town of Vail Zoning Code. The applicant or his successors in interest a shall file a declaration of covenants and restrictions with the Clerk and Recorder of Eagle County in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to insure the restrictions set forth herein shall run with the land. Said declaration shall not be amended or terminated without the written approval of the Town of Vail. Subsequent to the effective date of this ordinance, no building permit shall be issued for the redevelopment of this Special Development District No. 28 until said declaration of covenants and restrictions are executed and filed with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder. D. SITE COVERAGE: The maximum allowable site coverage for Lot D shall not exceed 39% of the buildable lot size and shall be as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. E. LANDSCAPING: At least thirty-two percent (32%} of Lot D shall be landscaped and shall be as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. F. PARKING: Parking for SDD No. 28 sha11 be met as designated on the development plans~set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. Section 4 The applicant or his successors in interest agrees to perform the following: 1. The applicant or his successors in interest shall obtain a revocable right-of-way permit from the Town in order to add the proposed landscaping at the entrance to the Lot P-3 parking area, as designated on the development plans set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. 2. The applicant or his successors in interest has agreed to financially participate in the construction of a sidewalk along the west side of the Mill Creek Court Chute, 4 n from Hanson Ranch Road to West Gore Creek Drive, as designated in the Town's adopted Streetscape Master Plan. Such financial contribution shall not exceed one third of the total cost of the sidewalk. 3. The applicant or his successors in interest has agreed that should any of the relocated evergreens not survive two growing seasons, such tree shall be replaced with an 8-10' evergreen on a one-to-one ratio. Section 5 Amendments to the approved development plan may be granted pursuant to Section 18.40 of the Municipal code of the Town of Vail. Section 6 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 7 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 8 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any. ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5 Y Q R Section 9 All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING,, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the day of , 1992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 6 RESOLUTION NO. 9 SERIES 1992 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VAIL TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, Section 2.24.060 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail provides that the Planning and Environmental Commission shall make and adopt a Master Plan for approval by the Town Council for the transportation development of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Vail Transportation Master Plan was developed through extensive participation by the public, the Transportation Advisory Committee, the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Plan is a reflection of the goals, desires and objectives of the citizens of the Town of Vail for the long term transportation planning and development of the area set forth in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Vail Transportation Master Plan was adopted by the Planning and Environmental Commission at a regular meeting and is hereby submitted to the Town Council for its approval. WHEREAS, the Town Council is of the opinion that the Vail Transportation Master Plan is an appropriate long range planning document guiding growth and development within the area set forth in the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado that: 1. The Town Council hereby approves the Vail Transportation Master Plan as submitted by the Planning and Environmental Commission. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C:\RESOLU92.9 - ~i~ ~ Vail Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUiVIiVIARY The purpose of this Executive Summary of the Vail Transportation Master Plan is to consolidate all of the transportation plan recommendations into a single document for easy access and reference. The Transportation Master Plan Final Report documents the entire planning process including data collection, public input, alternatives analysis, and the rationale behind each recommendation. The Transportation Master Plan Final Report should, therefore, be consulted for a full explanation and clarification of the recommendations summarized herein. The Transportation Master Plan recommendations are summarized into five major categories and include both short-term and long-term actions as listed below. In general, short-term actions should be implemented in a 1 to 5 year time frame while long-term actions may require anywhere from 6 to 20 years to fully implement. VAIL VILLAGE ®ELIVERIES SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Modify policies at Checkpoint Charlie. o Eliminate 30°Yo of the traffic (cars) accessing the Core for small deliveries and minor tasks through use of the 1-1/2 hours of free parking in the Vail Parking Structure for this type of need. - Designate a desirable area of the Vail Parking Structure for short term parking. - Enforcement of this issue would be key to its success. Educate the users that the Town is providing convenient short term spots in the Vail Parking Structure, however, abuse of these spots will result in strict enforcement. o Develop written policies concerning vehicles requiring access to the Village including: - Cars without large amounts of goods to be delivered will not be allowed in the Village or in the loading zones. Use of the parking structure would be required for these trips. - Trucks and cars that are making deliveries of large quantities of goods will be allowed access to the Village loading zones and will be given priority for these zones. Time will be limited to only what is needed to load or unload these goods. In addition, a permitting process could be established to access these zones. - The towing of vehicles for violation of loading zone restrictions will be strictly enforced. - Construction work requiring parking will need to be planned and approved in advance by the Town of Vail Building Department and Police Department. Town of Vail Page i Vail Transportation Master Plan ~ Executive Summary - Service vehicles will be allowed limited access to some loading zones for emergency work only. Non-emergency service work should be scheduled for non-peak traffic hours in the Village. All service vehicles will need to contact the Police Department for a parking permit for both the emergency and non- emergency work. - All loading zone restrictions will be lifted after 6:00 P.M. The loading zones on Gore Creek Drive, Bridge Street, and Hanson Ranch Road (from Bridge Street to Hanson Ranch Chute) however, will be posted as a "No Parking Area" after 6:00 P.M. o Investigate the possibility of locating "drop boxes" in designated places for overnight couriers. 2. Implement the following actions and procedures. o Eliminate loading zones on Bridge Street and Hanson Ranch Road near Mill Creek only. o Allow only morning use of the Gore Creek Drive loading area in the vicinity of the Lodge Promenade (winter: 9:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. and summer: 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.). o Convert the 15 minute parking areas on the north side of the Christiania lot and adjacent to Riva Ridge North to delivery and service vehicles only with no large delivery trucks allowed. o Install "One Way/Do Not Enter" signs further north on Willow Bridge Road. o Convert the 15 minute parking north of Willow Bridge to truck only. 3. Authorize capital improvements in an attempt to reduce the 33°!0 "lost guest" number and those who enter the Village the wrong way. o Relocate Checkpoint Charlie south to the vicinity of Willow Road. ' o Construct landscaped medians south on Vail Road from the Frontage Road. o Further evaluate informational and directional signing clarifications and modify as needed. o Construct entry feature monument signs, at all entry points to pedestrian areas. o Prior to construction of monument signs provide and install a standard sign which o warns motorists with the wording "Auto Restricted Zone Ahead" at all pedestrian zone entry points. ° Town of Vail Page 11 Vail Transportation Master Plan ive Summary _ _ . , _ . , . Execut 4. Review the information signs and traffic control procedures at the I-70 exit ramps at the 4-way stop intersection. o Install portable, variable message signs at the 4-way stop intersection (Vail Road median) and the I-70 exit ramps providing clear messages to drivers based on derfiand. o Develop action policies for the following groups; (1) CSO's in Village, (2) 4-way traffic controllers, (3) checkpoint personnel, (4}parking structure operations and other Town employees. These action policies should relate to enforcement, who is allowed access to the Village, and vehicle towing procedures. Evaluate disallowing certain traffic movements during peak demand periods based on traffic demands and circumstances. 5. Work with Vail Associates in designating allowed skier drop-off areas. This would be an attempt to recognize the problem versus banning all skier drop-offs. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 6. Christiania lot. o Resolve the land ownership issues. o Evaluate in greater detail: - Technological options of hand cart deliveries and small vehicle for deliveries and storage lockers. - Operational characteristics and regulations for hand carts and small vehicles along with liability issues, storage problems, and financing options. - Evaluate options to make the site both aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood and operational for the truck delivery functions. 7. Additional sites: o South of Lodge at Vail - Resolve land ownership and legal issues. - Evaluate compatibility with International Wing development plans. - Address Vail Associates concerns - Address United States Forest Service concerns. o Golden Peak - Resolve land ownership issues. - Address Vail Associates concerns. o Other Location Options Town of Vail Page iii Vail Transportation Master Plan ive Summary , , . , Execut.. , P/~RKIPDG SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Actively encourage private sector involvement in implementing Travel Demand Management techniques such as: - Price discounts for group arrivals by multi-occupant vehicles. - Enhanced loading facilities for group arrivals convenient to mountain access points. 2. Retain the existing formal, public parking supply of 2,750 spaces. 3. Annually review and adjust parking fees: - Parking structure hourly rates. , - Premium parking program (Gold Pass) fees. - Discount parking program (Blue Pass and coupons) fees. - Ford Park hourly rates. 4. Annually review and adjust parking controls and restrictions: - Valid time periods for various premium and discount programs. - Parking locations reserved for various user groups. - Availability of discounts to various user groups. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 5. Evaluate sites and land ownership issues for potential future expansion of the formal, public parking supply including: - Ford Park parking lot - West Day lot - North Day lot - Expansion of Lionshead parking structure 6. Evaluate remote, out-lying parking potentials including site availability and transit cost impacts to link remote parking areas with the Town. 7. Evaluate replacement sites for parking over-sized vehicles if the existing parking area adjacent to the Lionshead parking structure is redeveloped. Potential sites include: - West Vail (Safeway area) - Vail Mountain School parking lot - Golf course parking lot - Ford Park parking lot - Athletic field parking lot - Red Sandstone School parking lot Town of Vail Page N Vail Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary IN-TOWN SHUTTLE SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Develop performance specifications for ahigh-capacity bus vehicle and submit a Solicitation of Interest to potential manufacturers and bidders. 2. Implement ahigh-capacity bus vehicle operation along the existing In-Town Shuttle route. 3. Relocate the turnaround at Golden Peak to separate autoJbus conflicts. 4. Further evaluate relocating the west turnaround of the In-Town Shuttle to East Lionshead Circle to remove the special shuttle vehicle from mixed traffic operations on the South Frontage Road. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 5. Conduct a schematic design level technical study of a potential Village to Lionshead people mover to address: - New technologies and operating alternatives. - Identify alignment location options and station locations. - Define right-of-way and guideway envelopes for long-term preservation. 6. Evaluate the potential extension of the In-Town shuttle system into the Lionshead area in conjunction with future major redevelopment. OUTLYING BUS SYSTEM - SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Combine the West Vail routes as opposing loop services utilizing the North and South Frontage Roads operating at 15-minute headways. 2. Continue the Sandstone route at 20 minute headways during the winter season. 3. Reroute the East Vail route along Main Gore Drive to Bighorn Road. 4. Provide separate routes for East Vail (15 minute headways) and the golf course (30 minute headways) throughout the day and combine into one route after the evening peak period operating at 30 minute headways. S. Provide l5 minute headways between Ford Park and the Transportation Center on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Towri of Vail ~ Page v Vail Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 6. Expand service to Chamonix Lane and Lions Ridge Loop pending future improvements to these roadways to allow safe and efficient bus operations. 7. The Town of Vail should continue to work with other public agencies and private sector beneficiaries to define and operate Down Valley transit services. 1-70 ACCESS/LOCAL. CIRCIILATIOId SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Construct an I-70 underpass in the vicinity of Simba Run connecting the North and South Frontage Roads. 2. Upgrade the West Vail interchange and Frontage Road complex by implementing the following improvements: - Realign the west leg of the North Frontage Road between Wendy's and the Texaco service station to intersect Chamonix Road north of the existing intersection. - Realign the westbound I-70 on-ramp to connect with the east leg of the North Frontage Road. - Realign the eastbound I-70 on-ramp such that access to I-70 is via the South Frontage Road. - Add exclusive turn lanes for major left and right turning volumes at all intersections. 3. Conduct a controlled test at the Main Vail interchange to evaluate closing the east ramps and the traffic diversion to the East Village interchange. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Provide a connector roadway between the North Frontage Road and Chamonix Road in conjunction with future development in the vicinity of Vail Das Schone in West Vail. S. Evaluate improvement alternatives at the Main Vail interchange including: - Relocating the east ramps to the Booth Falls underpass. - Extending the North Frontage Road east and under I-70 to connect with~Vail Valley Drive immediately east of the Transportation Center. - Constructing new ramps to I-70 in the vicinity of the VA shops. 6. Monitor high volume intersections and provide demand responsive traffic control. The Town of Vail's preferred control method is to provide manual control with designated traffic control personnel. Town of Vail Page vi Vail Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary 7. Depress the South Frontage Road at Vail Valley Drive immediately east of the Transportation Center and provide side-street, stop-sign control on Vail Valley Drive at the South Frontage Road to allow through traffic on the Frontage Road to proceed without stopping. 8. Proceed with the long-term phased implementation of improvements to the Frontage Road system including: - Implementation of on-street, 6-foot wide bike lanes along the entire Frontage Road system throughout the •Town. - Implementation of exclusive left turn lanes at 31 intersections including the provision of a continuous center turn lane along approximately 4.5 miles of the Frontage Road system. - Provision of landscaping at major intersections and points of interest. - Implementation of special safety improvements (e.g. guardrail, lighting, etc.) at major intersections, along non-residential roadway segments, high pedestrian activity areas, and at the ends of center medians. 9. Evaluate Vail Valley Drive as an eastbound one-way street between the South Frontage Road immediately east of the Transportation Center and a new connection with the South Frontage Road in the vicinity of Ford Park. TRAIL SYSTEM INTERFACE 1. Proceed with the long-term, phased implementation of the Streetscape Master Plan including the separation of conflicting travel modes including: - Vail Valley Drive - West Meadow Drive - East Lionshead Circle - Relocation of Check Point Charlie - Willow Bridge Road Improvements 2. Proceed with the long-term, phased implementation of the Recreation Trails Master plan including detailed studies of eight key links throughout the Town: - Study Link 1: Stephens Park to 2154 South Frontage Road West - Study Link 2: West Gore Creek Circle to Matterhorn Circle/Donovan Park - Study Link 3: LionsheadjVail Library to the Vista Bahn - Study Link 4: Vail Village to Kaotos Ranch Trail - Study Link 5: Gore Creek Bridge to Lupine Drive - Study Link 6: Nugget Lane to Meadow Drive - Study Link 7: Meadow Drive to Bighorn Park - Study Link 8: Vail Racquet Club to Main Gore Drive North Town of Vail Page vil f ' ~i ~ Vall Transportation Master Plan Chapter II o Existing short-term parking areas were suggested to be converted to truck loading zones only and adequately enforced. This includes the areas on Gore Creek Drive next to the Miil Creek building and the Christiania parking lot and on Hanson Ranch Road next to the Christiania parking lot. o The idea of connecting Hanson Ranch Road to Gore Creek Drive with cone-way roadway behind the Red Lion was suggested to be further considered, recognizing that extensive landscaping and pedestrian amenities would also be included along Mill Creek. o The truck loading areas on Willow Bridge Road in the vicinity of Check Point Charlie were recommended to be retained with major landscaping and amenities provided to separate pedestrian movements from truck operations. o Depending upon the final combination of official truck loading zones to be designated by the Town Council, Check Point Charlie would be relocated or additional control points defined to not only control truck operations but also to intercept lost tourists prior to reaching the Village core. RECOMMENDATIONS/PRIORITIES The Vail Village goods delivery plan is illustrated in Figure 6 (A and B), and consists of a modified decentralized delivery strategy. Elements of the plan are as follows; prioritized by short-term (Figure 6A) and long-term (Figure 6B) actions. Short Term, o Total delivery and service parking spaces needed in the short-term is 25 to 30 spaces. o Modify policies at Checkpoint Charlie. ~ - - Eliminate 30% of the traffic (cars) accessing the Core for small deliveries and minor tasks through use of the 1-1 /2 hours of free parking in the Vail Parking Structure for this type of need. • Designate a desirable area of the Vail Parking Structure for short term parking. • Enforcement of this issue would be key to its success. Educate the users that the Town is providing convenient short term spots in the Vail Parking Structure, however, abuse of these spots will result in strict enforcement. - Develop written policies concerning vehicles requiring access to the Village including: • Cars without large amounts of goods to be delivered will not be allowed in the Village or in the loading zones. Use of the parking structure would be required for these trips. Town of Vail Page 26 F E L S 8 U R G ~ Install "One-Way/Do Not Enter" Signs H 0 L T & U L L E V I G 'N®®a'oN. or 4 Provide 15 Minute ~ ~ ~ Truck-Only Retain Existing ~ ~ \ ,G Loading Zone Loading Zones / / ~ m m ~ m ~re c Re@aln Existing ~ a ~ ~a~ Loading Zons m $ ~ ~ ~ / . 'o a Q (1 H.C. m 4(2F~.C.~ Gore Creek U ' S Allow Small Vehicles Allow Loading in Only. Prohibit 88KV~ Morning Hours Only Large Trucks Got® GI r Allow Small Vehicles Only r 4 Prohibit Large Trucks • Convert 15 MlnutE 1 Parking Zones \ to Delivery Relocate Check 5 Loedinp Zonee. Point Charlie L~ 8 ~ ~ 0 ~anean i ' ~ ~ Legend Remove Bridge Street and Hanson Ranch . Road Loading Zones o Delivery Vehicle Loading Zones Figure 6.4 Private Service Access Areas O - Recommended Goods Delivery System Number of Spaces Short-Term Not to Scale ~ ' F E L S B U R G " H 0 L T & ~ ' U L L E V I G® I fir. ~ / m, W ~'r`'~ ti l' \~B Cr / n tq ~a,F o O m k pr. Gore Cree eeK Ot. Gore ~t ~ ^ Neneo~ e • lJ l ; Legend ~ ~ . Potential sites or search areas for future truck ~ loading facilities of 15 to 20 spaces each. m~ (Also Golden Peak Area) Figure 6B Private Service Access Areas ROCOmmended GOOdS De/iVely System Not to Scale LO/~g-Term Vail Transportation Master Plan pter tl _ _ - - - _ _ - Cha • Trucks and cars that are making deliveries of large quantities of goods will be allowed access to the Village loading zones and will be given priority for these zones. Time will be limited to only what is needed to load or unload these goods. In addition, a permitting process could be established to access these zones. • The towing of vehicles for violation of loading zone restrictions will be strictly enforced. • Construction work requiring parking will need to be planned and approved in advance by the Town of Vail Building Department and Police Department. • Service vehicles will be allowed limited access to some loading zones for emergency work only. Non-emergency service work should be scheduled for non-peak traffic hours in the Village. All service vehicles will need to contact the Police Department for a parking permit for both the emergency and non-emergency work. • All loading zone restrictions will be lifted after 6:00 P.M. The loading zones on Gore Creek Drive, Bridge Street, and Hanson Ranch Road (from Bridge Street to Hanson Ranch Chute) however, will be posted as a "No Parking Area" after 6:00 P.M. - Investigate the possibility of locating "drop boxes" in designated places for overnight couriers. o Implement the following actions and procedures. - Eliminate loading zones on Bridge Street and Hanson Ranch Road near Mill Creek only. - Allow only morning use of the Gore Creek Drive loading area in the vicinity of the Lodge Promenade (winter: 9:00 A.M, to 2:00 P.M. and summer: 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.). - Convert the 15 minute parking areas on the north side of the Christiania lot and adjacent to Riva Ridge North to delivery and service vehicles only with no large delivery trucks allowed. - Install "One Way/Do Not Enter" signs further north on Willow Bridge Road. - Convert the 15 minute parking north of Willow Bridge to truck only. o Authorize capital improvements in an attempt to reduce the 33% "lost guest" number and those who enter the Village the wrong way. - Relocate Checkpoint Charlie south to the vicinity of Willow Road. - Construct landscaped medians south on Vail Road from the Frontage Road. Town of Vail Page 29 Vail Transportation Master Plan Chapter II - Further evaluate informational and directional signing clarifications and modify as needed. - Construct entry feature monument signs, at all entry points to pedestrian areas. - Prior to construction of monument signs provide and install a standard sign which warns motorists with the wording "Auto Restricted Zone Ahead" at all pedestrian zone entry points. o Review the information signs and traffic control procedures at the I-70 exit ramps at the 4-way stop intersection. - Install portable, variable message signs at the 4-way stop intersection (Vail Road median) and the I-70 exit ramps providing clear messages to drivers based on demand. - Develop action policies for the following groups; (1) CSO's in Village, (2) 4-way traffic controllers, (3) checkpoint personnel, (4) parking structure operations and other Town employees. These action policies should relate to enforcement, who is allowed access to the Village, and vehicle towing procedures. Evaluate disallowing certain traffic movements during peak demand periods based on traffic demands and circumstances. o Work with Vail Associates in designating allowed skier drop-off areas. This would be an attempt to recognize the problem versus banning all skier drop-offs. Long Term o Total delivery and service parking spaces needed in the tong-term is 35 to 40 spaces. o Christiania lot. - Resolve the land ownership issues. - Evaluate in greater detail: • Technological options of hand cart deliveries and small vehicle for deliveries . and storage lockers. • Operational characteristics and regulations for hand carts and small vehicles along with liability issues, storage problems, and financing options. • Evaluate options to make the site both aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood and operational for the truck delivery functions. Town of Vail Page 30 Vail Transportation Master Plan Chapter II o Additional sites: - South of Lodge at Vail • Resolve land ownership and legal issues. • Evaluate compatibility with International Wing development plans. • Address Vail Associates concerns • Address United States Forest Service concerns. - Golden Peak a Resolve land ownership issues. • Address Vail Associates concerns. - Other Location Options Town of Vail Page 31 WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP April 3, 1992 Page 1 of 2 - ~f TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 05107 SALES TAX COLLECTION LARRYISTEVE: Research remedies to change this to Draft ordinance forwarded to Forest Service and VA for (request: Gibson/Lapin) a mandatory TOV tax collection. review. Forest Service response unclear. 417/92 Executive Session item. ~ 09/17 STREET LIGHTS PETE BURNETT: The LionsHead Merchants Analysis complete and Ken will present analysis to Rob (request: Levine) Association would like to see a couple changes, Levine. which might include some of the lighting by Montaneros, which is too bright, and placing it in front of Gallery Row in the Treetops Building. 11/19 NEWSPAPER VENDING LARRY: What can be done to make these uniform and Discussions have begun with vendors. MACHINES locations less prolific? 01/21 EVENING PARKING MIKE ROSE/STEVE B.: Evaluate financial Mike Rose has put together raw data which is being STRUCTURE FEES ramifications of eliminating parking structure fees analyzed by the Finance Department. To Council (request: Lapin) after 6:00 p.m. each night. Further review summer 4121/92. free parking, generating numbers to show revenue and expenses if some nominal fee were to be charged. 01/21 BEAVER POND KRISTAN: Check with FEMA experts and Interfleuve, Three reports received from Interfleuve, Hydrosphere, REVITALIZATION Hydrosphere, and Wetland Aquatics to see what solution and Wetland Aquatics will be analyzed by Community what might be appropriate to revitalize this pond Development and Todd 0., and then presented to (i.e., dredging or other means). Council. 02/04 HERITAGE CABLEVISION CAROLINE: Prepare new letter of protest for Mayor's Will do upon return of Merv. FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS signature. XC: Newspapers, Dillon, Minturn, etc. (request: Lapin) WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP April 3, 1992 Page 2 of 2 i TOPIC, QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 02111 GLASS ORDINANCE IN ALL LARRY/KEN/STEVE FOSTER: Staff discussion and To Council on 417192. ATHLETIC PARK FACILITIES draft ordinance prepared. 02111 HORSEDRAWN CARRIAGE KEN/LARRY: Prepare extension to agreement, Advisory Committee to help draft standards of AGREEMENT including possible provisions for hobbling, dragging operations and other criteria. Draft contract weights, and other options. to be presented to Council prior to signing. Back to Council by 4114192. Dave Sloan, Carriage Rides, Inc., is currently not doing business. 02117 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTANIANDY: Draft ordinance. To Council on 4114/92. 03/10 AFFORDABLE HOUSING KRISTANILARRY: Draft ordinance, To Council for 4114/92 work session, followed by PROVISIONS ORDINANCE 4121192 evening meeting. 03110 LIONSHEAD SALES TAX FIGURES STEVE B./STEVE T.: Packy Walker, on behalf of the Will investigate. (request: Osterfoss, Levine, LH Merchants Assn., is requesting an accounting of Gibson, Steinberg) sales tax taken from a square footage basis, standard number (such as Dow Jones) of businesses reporting, to offer a comparative analysis. 03117 GOAL SHARING SESSION COUNCIL: Carl Neu will be facilitating agoal-sharing session to include the Avon Town Council, Eagle County Commissioners, and Vail Town Council, probably all day on Monday, 4/27192. Please mark your calendars. More details to follow.