Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992-04-14 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUP WORK SESSl~I' TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 1992 ~ 1:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. Discussion Re: Amphitheater Building Permit Fees. (Rod Slifer) 2. Discussion Re: Town Council Authorization to Allow Housing Authority to Proceed with the SDD Application Process for 4 Town of Vail Owned Lots Located at 2477-2497 Garmish Drive/Lots 1 through 4, Block H, Vail Das Schone Filing No. 2. 3. PEC Report. 4. Discussion Re: Proposed Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1992, An Ordinance to Create a New Section of the Design Review Guidelines to Regulate Outdoor Lighting. 5. Review of Final Design for AIPP Vail Transportation Center Project. 6. Discussion Re: Regional Transportation. 7. Town Council Goal-Setting Revision Session and Meeting Format Discussion. 8. Information Update. 9. Council Reports. 10. Other. 11. Adjournment. C:IAGENDA. WS a VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 1992 1:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 1:00 p.m. 1. Discussion re: Amphitheater Building permit fees. Rod Slifer Action Reauested of Council: Listen to the presentation and prepare to discuss options. Backaround Rationale: As part of the Amphitheater renovation, the Vail Valley Foundation has been required to pay the routine building permit fees. Rod Slifer would like to discuss possible options with Council. 1:15 p.m. 2. Discussion re: Request to proceed through the SDD process for Jill Kammerer 4 Town of Vail owned lots located at 2477-2497 Garmish Drive and legally described as Lots 1 through 4, Block H, Vail Das Schone Filing No. 2. Action Reauested of Council: Approve or deny the request to allow the Housing Authority to proceed through the planning process. Backaround Rationale: The Housing Authority would like to initiate an 8 unit (approximately) for-sale development on the Vail das Schone site pursuant to the March 24, 1992, Council work session discussion. Because the land is owned by the Town of ~ Vail, Council permission is required in order for the Housing Authority to pursue the redevelopment of the site. Staff Recommendation: Approve the request. 1:25 p.m. 3. PEC Report. 1:35 p.m. 4. Discussion re: Proposed Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1992, an Andy Knudtsen ordinance to create a new section of the Design Review Guidelines to regulate outdoor lighting. Action Reauested of Council: Provide feedback to staff regarding the proposed ordinance. Backaround Rationale: Staff has been working with the Design Review Board on a new set of standards for the Design Review Guidelines which will regulate outdoor lighting. The DRB has reviewed the ordinance at two work sessions, and staff has incorporated their suggestions into the ordinance. After receiving initial feedback from Council on this ordinance, staff would like to set up a work session with DRB, Council, and a lighting consultant. During that meeting, there would be a review of examples of various lighting intensities, and a consensus reached as to a reasonable standard to include in the proposed ordinance could be reached. Please see the attached ordinance and cover memo for additional information. 1 c a 2:20 p.m. 5. Review of final design for AIPP Vail Transportation Center Shelly Mello project. Action Reauested of Council: Uphold/modify/deny AIPP decision. Backaround Rationale: On April 8, 1992, the AIPP voted unanimously to approve the final design submitted by Dan Dailey. The final mural design will be a combination of the three drawings to be reviewed by Council. Staff Recommendation: Approve proposal. 2:35 p.m. 6. Discussion re: Regional Transportation. Peggy Osterfoss _ Backaround Rationale: Peggy will present information concerning ridership, maintenance facility feasibility, percentage contributions by involved entities, and related issues. 3:05 p.m. 7. Council Goal-Setting revision session and meeting format Ron Phillips discussion. Action Reauested of Council: Following the joint Council/Staff goal-setting session on February 19, 1992, it is recommended that the preliminary set of 21 goals be reviewed and refined into a final list of goals to be adopted by Council through Resolution. The goals that should appear on that list should be those to which Council is committed over the next 3-5 year period. 4:05 p.m. 8. Information Update. 9. Council Reports. 10. Other. 11. Adjournment. C:WGENDA.WSE 2 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION April 13, 1992 AGENDA 12:30 PM Site Visits 2:00 PM Public Hearing Site Visits Public Hearing 4. 1. A request for an extension of a previously approved setback variance for the Schofield Residence, 1448 Vail Valley Drive/Lot 18, Block 3, Vail Valley 1st Filing. Applicant: John Schofield Planner: Andy Knudtsen 5. 2. A request for a variance from the maximum allowable driveway grade for Lot 8, Bighorn Estates/4249 Nugget Lane. Applicant: Barry & Debbie Schrager Planner: Shelly Mello , 2. 3. A request for a minor subdivision and a variance from Chapter 18.22.050 -Lot Area and Site Dimensions, Public Accommodation Zone District, and a variance from Chapter 17 -Subdivision Regulations for Villa Valhalla, a portion of Lot J, Block 5A, Vail Village 5th Filing/384 Gore Creek Drive Applicant: Villa Valhalla Association, Inc. represented by James Pansing Planner: Jill Kammerer 1. 4. A request for a conditional use permit for a construction staging site located at the Vail Associates West Day Lot, Lots A and B, Morcus 'Subdivision. Applicants: Vail Associates/Sonnenalp Properties Planner: Andy Knudtsen 3. 5. A request for an exterior alteration at the May Palace Restaurant, 223 East Gore Drive/Part of Lot A, Block 5B, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Peter Switzer Planner: Shelly Mello 6. A request for setback and site coverage variances for the Wilhelm Residence, 4289 Nugget Lane (West Unit)/Lot 5, Bighorn Estates, Resubdivision of Lots 10 and 11. Applicant: Robert and Karen Wilhelm Planner: Jill Kammerer TABLED TO APRIL 27, 1992 7. Review and comment on letter to U.S. Forest Service regarding Colorado Heli-Ski application. 8. Approval of March 9 and March 23 meeting minutes. GAS `~'~`~'R~' ~3 ;y TOWN OF VAIL 7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Community Development Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2138/479-2139 April 14, 1992 Jeff Bailey District Ranger, U.S. Forest Service Dillon Ranger District P.O. Box 620 Silverthorne, CO 80498 RE: Colorado Heli-Ski Dear Jeff: This letter is sent as an addendum to a letter you recently received from the Town of Vail dated April 3, 1992. The Town of Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) has had the opportunity to review Colorado Heli-Ski's application to the Forest Service for a special use permit, and would like to add the following comments: 1. The application indicates that "support vehicles consist of a trailer (as a warming house and for equipment storage) and fuel and service truck for the helicopter." Is it Colorado Heli-Ski's intention to locate the support vehicle at the helicopter staging sites only, or will such support vehicles be located adjacent to the designafed helicopter ski areas? Specifically, where would the support vehicles be located with regard to Area #19? 2. It appears that the nearest helicopter staging area, to the Town of Vail, would be located at the top of Vail Pass. The Town of Vail's PEC would like to go on record as strongly opposing any helicopter staging area that would be located within the Gore Valley. Again, the Town is concerned with the potential for noise impacts on the residential and commercial areas of the Town. Mr. Jeff Bailey April 14, 1992 Page 2 Thank you again for allowing the Town of Vail to comment on the Colorado Heli-Ski special use permit application. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding any of the above comments, please feel free to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, Mike Mollica Assistant Director of Planning cc: Town Council Planning and Environmental Commission Ron Phillips \Ird „ QEr„o APR ~ TOWN OF VAIL ~'g°~ 7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Community Development Vail, Colorado 8165 7 303-479-?138 /479-2139 April 3, 1992 . Mr. Jeff Bailey District Ranger U.S. Forest Service Dillon Ranger District P.O. Box 620 Silverthome, CO 80498 Re: Colorado Hell-Ski Dear Jeff: i ~ Thank you for allowing the Town of Vail the•opportunity to comment on Colorado Heli-Ski's application to the Forest Service for a special use permit. We have reviewed your summary of the proposal and the map indicating the areas currently under permit and the new areas which are applied for under the special use permit. ~-The Town of Vail is specifically concerned with Area No. 19, which is located immediately north of the Town of Vail and east of the Red Sandstone Road. Our concerns are as follows: 1. We are concerned with the potential noise impacts of having helicopter flights over the Town of Vail. We would presume that those skiers attempting to utilize Areas 19 and 26 would stage out of the Vail Pass helicopter staging area. If this is the case, the Town suggests that helicopter flights to those areas stay north of I-70, at whatever distance is necessary so that there will be no noise impacts to the Town. In addition to the noise impacts, we believe Colorado Heli-Ski should stay north of I-70 because many of the medical helicopters which service this area utilize the I-70 corridor as a navigation route. We believe this will minimize - • the conflicts with medical and emergency helicopters. - . • 2. It appears that some privately owned property may be included in the proposed permit boundary for Area No. 19, specifically in the Spraddle Cresk area. We would recommend modifying the boundary to exclude all private lands. • 3. Where will the skier pick-up occur for Area No. 19? Will these transportation related impacts be studied? Will the skiers be picked up by vans, or will they be picked up by helicopter? . • i Mr. Jeff Bailey . April 3, 1992 Page 2 - Thank you again for allowing us to comment on the application for a special use permit. Should you have any questions regarding our comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2138. Since/rely, / vl?~~C ~r~-~-- Mike Mollica Assistant Director of Planning /ab cc: Kristan Pritr Dick Duran ~'D MAn 1 0 l:~yC United States Forest Dillon Ranger P. 0. Box 620 Department of Service District Silverthorne, CO Agriculture - 80498 Rep 1y To: 1950/2720 Date: March 13, 1992 MR MIKE MOLLICA, SENIOR PLANNER TOWN OF VAIL DEPT OF COMMUNTIY DEVELOPMENT 75 SO FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL CO 81657 ' Dear Mike: Colorado Heli-Ski has operated a back country helicopter skiing service under . Special Use Permit since 1981. 'The term of the permit will expire in December 1992, and CHS has applied for a new permit to be issued for a period of ten years. The Dillon District is seeking public comments pertinent to the. issuance of this Special Use Permit. Environmental and decision documents will be prepared for this proposal. ~ - _ The history of helicopter skiing on the Wfiite River National forest goes back more than a decade. In 1980, an Environmental Assessment was written by the . Sopris Ranger District to allow Colorado Ski Guides to operate. The following ~ year, they were also permitted on the Holy Cross District. . The authorization for Colorado Heli-Ski (and it's forerunner, Rocky Mountain - - Heli=Ski) to operate includes Dillon Ranger District (since 1981), Holy Cross Ranger District (since 1984) and Leadville Ranger District, Pike/San Isabel National Forest (since 1990). Environmental documents on various aspects of this helicopter skiing operation have been prepared in 1981, 1985 and 1988 by Dillon Ranger District, and in 1990 by.Leadville District. ~ The attached maps show terrain which Colorado Heli-Ski is applying for. - Included on the maps are areas CHS is now authorized to access via helicopter - for guided back country skiing. Also shown are areas which have been requested by CHS, but are not now authorized. The date each area was first permitted by an Environmental Assessment and Decision document are listed on the map. Colorado Heli-Ski's operation consists of one helicopter and support vehicles. Support vehicles consist of a trailer (as a~warming house and for equipment . storage) and f_uPl and ~P.-.~; ~e rn~ck for the he l- i per. Clients are given the..:;--Y~= choice of a half-day or all-day experience. Location of each day's skiing ~is ~ very dependant upon snow conditions and remote sites free of ski tracks. - Clients drive to a staging area (see maps) where they meet CHS and the helicopter picks them up and transports them to skiable terrain nearby. CHS decides where the snow conditions are optimal for backcountry skiing, performs an avalanche hazard evaluation and determines whether the trip is a "Go" or "NoGo". The helicopter and pilot, Colorado Heli-Ski and its guides are insured, operate within Federal Aviation Agency guidelines and work in ~ - accordance with an approved operating plan, which covers: daily operations, briefing and liability, guest skier ability, snow stability evaluation program, helicopter operations, guide qualifications and responsibilities, emergency procedures, and check lists and reporting. Colorado Heli-Ski provides backcountrv ski. access to about 1200 to-1~AA~rlients der year. The helicopter flies skiing clients on an average o 65 days eac winter, usually between January 1 and April 30. Additionally, CHS is involved in 5-10 search and rescue operation each winter. CHS provides other services - such as scenic flights and charters, which are not subject to special use permit as they do not occupy public lands. Some topics that may be of concern to you include possible disturbance of some wildlife habitat and species, conflicts between motorized and non-motorized .uses in the backcountrv, impacts to private land, and economic effects on local economies. Your thoughts about this special use application are needed for this planning process: Issues that are important to you may affect the issuance of this permit. Please respond in writing to the address in the letterhead. If you wish to participate in this environmental analysis or to be kept informed of the process, please respond to this letter. The~time period for public scoping will end April 15, 1992. If you have not responded by that time, your name will be removed from the Colorado Heli-Ski public mailing list, but may be~contacted for future projects. Sincerely, FF BAILEY ~ . District Ranger 1. enclosure _~i:-°.,. _ ..r! . . ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: April 14, 1992 SUBJECT: Review of Proposed Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Over the last several weeks, staff has been reviewing a draft ordinance for outdoor lighting with the Design Review Board and concerned neighbors. During two worksessions, comments were made about the draft, most of which have been incorporated into the ordinance. The most significant concept the DRB wanted incorporated into the ordinance would allow more light on the "front" of properties than in the "back." Staff has written the proposed draft to allow lights located in the front of a lot to be a size of 10 feet. Anywhere else on the site, the maximum height is limited to 3 feet. Other specific items which have been changed include: 1. A statement has been added disallowing any lighting to be affixed to vegetation. 2. A purpose section has been added; 3. Glare has been redefined; t 4. "Residential Zoning" has been defined to include all zone districts from Hillside Residential to MDMF zoning; 5. The type of lighting fixtures have been explained; 6. A requirement for directing light inward on property has been included; 7. The existing language in the code relating to lighting has been deleted; 8. Maximum height is limited to ten feet; and 9. "Height" has been more specifically defined. Concerning holiday lighting, staff believes this type of lighting has not presented much of a problem and may not need to be regulated. At the second worksession, the DRB concurred and recommended that Christmas tree lighting should be allowed without review. After reviewing ordinances from three other communities and discussing lighting regulations with planners from Aspen and Breckenridge, staff has put together an ordinance which has been tailored to Vail's needs. The ordinance has been laid out so that: A. All property must conform to general standards for lighting; B. Property in the lower density residential zones must comply with stricter lighting standards; and C. In no case shall any outdoor lighting be attached to vegetation. Staff would like to hire a lighting consultant to review this work. We believe a consultant's expertise will allow us to double check the proposal. Staff has contacted a professor at the University of Colorado who operates his own lighting company in addition to his work at the ` r University. We anticipate reviewing the ordinance with him in the next week, and then setting up a joint worksession with the DRB and Town Council for April 28 to review these standards. Staff believes it would be most helpful to schedule this meeting after dark so we can evaluate the intensities of various lights within the community and, hopefully, come to a consensus as to the standards which we want to incorporate into our ordinance. e w * ~ ORDINANCE NO. 6 ' Series of 1992 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.04 OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SECTIONS 18.04.205, 18.04.203, 18.04.065, AND 18.04.273, SETTING FORTH NEW DEFINITIONS RELATING TO THE ZONING CODE; AMENDING SECTION 18.54.040(C)(1) OF THE VAIL MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF PARAGRAPH (m) PROVIDING FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLANS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE TOWN OF VAIL; AMENDING SECTION 18.54.050 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL BY THE ADDITION OF PARAGRAPH (J) PROVIDING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD GUIDELINES RELATING TO OUTDOOR LIGHTING; AND PROVIDING DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vail wishes to minimize the unintended and undesirable side effects of outdoor lighting, while encouraging the intended and desirable safety and aesthetic purposes of outdoor lighting; and WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to establish a new section of the Town's Design Guidelines, setting forth standards to regulate outdoor lighting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1 Chapter 18.04 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.205 to read as follows: Light Source - a single artificial point source of luminescence that emits measurable radiant energy in or near the visible spectrum. Section 2 Chapter 18.04 of the Vail Municipal Code Is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.203 to read as follows: Light Spillage -any reflection, glare or other artificial light emission onto an adjoining property above a defined maximum Intensity. Section 3 Chapter 18.04 of the Vall Municipal Code Is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.065 to read as follows: Unshielded Illuminatlon - Illumination from a light source that strikes a person's eye . directly before being reflected off of another surface. Section 4 Chapter 18.04 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.273 to read as follows: 1 Outdoor Llghting -Any light source, or collection of light sources, located outside a building, including but not limited to, light sources attached to any part of a structure, located / on the surface of the ground, or located on free standing poles. Section 5 Section 18.54.040{C)(1) of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph (m) to read as follows: (m) Lighting Plan. An outdoor lighting plan shall be submitted separately from the site plan or landscape plan, and shall show the location, the height above grade, the type of illumination (such as incandescent, halogen, high pressure sodium, etc.) and wattage for each light source which is proposed. In addition to locating this information graphically on a plan, the applicant shall provide the same information on the application form. Section 6 Section 18.54.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Cx~er+ar I:yht:'y s>-all d ir: ~ a:~~er-t8 F7;F;m;~a-in~ae~~f 4i;~„~; ~psa-+~•i-g araas-with°- ~ ~ref3esed-p~ejsst aFd :;YsF Section 7 Section 18.54.050 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph (J) to read as follows: 1. Purpose This section of the design guidelines establishes standards for minimizing the unintended and undesirable side effects of outdoor lighting while encouraging the intended and desirable safety and aesthetic purposes of outdoor lighting. It is the purpose of the design review guidelines to eliminate unshielded illumination and direct illumination in such a way to keep it on the property on which the light sources are located. In addition, the purpose of this section is to protect the legitimate privacy of neighboring residents by controlling light spillage. 2. Approval Required Outdoor lighting on all property within the Town limits shall conform to the requirements set forth in Paragraph 3(a). In addition to the standards set forth in 3(a), all outdoor lighting on residentially zoned property must conform to the standards set forth in 2 Paragraph 3(b). For the purposes of this section, residentially zoned properties shalt be • defined as those in Hillside Residential, Single Family, Two-Family, Primary/Secondary, Residential Cluster, Low Density Multi-Family and Medium Density Mufti-Family Zone District, as well as all SDDs which have any of the above-referenced zone districts as the underlying zoning. ` 3. Outdoor Lighting Standards a. Standards for all property. No light source shall be maintained in any manner or located where it creates a nuisance to the adjoining properties, nor shall light sources be erected which create a traffic hazard. Unshielded illumination shall not be allowed. All outdoor lighting sources shall be permanently covered on the top and sides by material that completely blocks the passage of light, except in the case of uplighting, in which case the lighting sources shall be covered on the bottom and sides, but open on the top. The covering shall direct light away from property lines toward the structures located on the site. The covering shall extend beyond the furthest point of the illumination source as follows: 0-99 watts: , 1 inch 100-199 watts: 2 inches 200-299 watts: 4 inches 300 or more watts: 6 inches ,7v~i' Wet,~?• ~~bhf Levert t kti.I QY U.~ n (Y Q•~f~~Sr G~1 b. Standards for Residentially Zoned Property. i. Outdoor lighting fixed to free standing poles shall not exceed, l0 feet in height as measured from the light source to the grade immediately below the source when it is located within a 30-foot setback measured from the front lot or site line, or located within the public right-of-way. 3 ii. All outdoor lighting fixed to free standing poles located outside of a the 30-foot setback measured from the front lot or site line, or located outside of the public right-of-way, shall not exceed 3 feet in height, as measured from the light source to the grade immediately below the source. iii. Light spillage of all outdoor lighting onto adjacent properties shall not exceed'/z foot candle vertical and shall not exceed Yz vertical horizontal, as measured at all property lines. 4. Prohibitions In no case shall any outdoor lighting be fixed to vegetation. 5. Exemptions. The standards of this section shall not apply to: a. Holiday decorations of a temporary nature which are illuminated between November 1 and April 15 of each year. b. Sign illumination, as further regulated in Title 16. c. Municipal lighting installed for the benefit of public health, safety and welfare. 6. Nonconformities. Please note: The length o/ the trans/tion perlod discussed below is not de/finite. The Town Attorney is currently researching this type o/regulation. As of the effective date of this ordinance, all outdoor lighting that does not conform to the requirements of this ordinance shall be non-conforming outdoor lighting. Such non- conforming outdoor lighting shall be legal and may be continued and maintained for 5 years after the effective date of this ordinance, but thereafter shall conform to all requirements of this ordinance. The 5 year period after the effective date of this ordinance shall be called the transition period. Any existing outdoor lighting source which is altered or moved within the 5 year transition period, or thereafter, shall conform to this ordinance. An existing lighting source may be maintained during the transition period without having to conform to this ordinance. 4 , Section 8 ' If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity ,of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 9 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 10 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and .reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 11 All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the day of , 1992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 5 e READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Cferk 6 ~ VAII TRANSPORTATION CENTER ART PROJECT LIST OF CONTRISUTERS PAID OR NAMES/ADDRESSES TYPE AMOUNT PLEDGE Baker, Dr. & Mrs. Robert Contributer S 100 Pledge 3950 N Frontage Road E, #22 Vail, CO 81657 Behler, Roger & Susan Contributer $ 100 Paid P.O. Box 2602 Vail, CO 81658 Chow, Dr. Franklin M.D. Contributer S 100 Paid 181 W Meadow Drive, Suite 600 Vail, CO 81657 Dobson, Cissy (Mrs. John A.) Benefactor S1,000 Paid 996 Ptarmigan Road Vail, CO 81657 Douglas, Morgan Supporter S 500 Paid . P.O. Box 476 Vail, CO 81657 ~ - . Futemick, Morris & Miriam Supporter S 500 Paid in memory of Arne Hansen 2 Grove Isle Drive, #1509 Miami, FL 33133 Fritch, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Supporter S 500 Paid 183 Gore Creek Drive Vail, CO 81657 Kalkus Foundation Supporter S 500 Paid 365 South Street Morristown, NJ 07960 Kosloff, Mr. and Mrs. Alan Contributer $ 100 Paid ~ . 5050 Sunset Drive ~ . Kansas City, MO 64112 Meagher, Cynthia ~ .Benefactor S 1,000 Pledge 1250 Westhaven Drive Vail, CO 81657 Seattle, WA ;r r Mendik, Bernard Contributer S 100 Paid 330 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Meyer, Liz and Luc/The Leff Bank Contributer S 100 Paid P.O. Box 176 Vail, CO 81658 Ross, Mr. and Mrs. Donald Jr. Contributer S 100 Paid 1297 Vail Valley Drive Vail, CO 81657 Slifer, Rod, Beth and Alexandra ~ Benefactor S 1,000 Pledge 230 Bridge Street Vail, CO 81657 Steinberg, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Contributer S 100 ~ Pledge P.O. Box 13 Vail, CO 81658 Strauss, Helaine Donation S 25 Paid 61 Crest Drive ~ _ South Orange, NJ 07079 Vail Village Inn Contributer $ 100 Paid 100 E. Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 Zehfuss, Larry & Carol Contributer S 200 Paid 105 Bristol Square ~ ~ , Pittsburgh, PA 15238 -`;iS • xp _'y`G_ ~i 5 • Kii . i~-.4, -j~. T~'I_t.)-tlL ~~;tl ~l fh:l y:1 l~~~ ~~3~Iti i-~~ ^+V ~~'V 11~! ' a O ; ~ I I t:14/pl~%92 i5: 6p $202 3:~4 1465 LIZ Kial3$Ii1S ~S~aa ~ ui; y- ,1 ~ha.;hi;.~c~in f ~~~T~ 6 1~~~~1~r~7-~~ aLU 7~~ Stret~t SE ~QA173 Te i~ QQDaE Tlla~,IC~~PY TRAN~MYTTAL cavB~, e~EET SATE s .,,,,+I ~ ~ w'O: ~..C~~Y ~(~Apl~S FROPd : ~ ~NA'~S7 S TEEECUpY NUM$ER: cRJ~_Z..~~"'C°I' .Q I~~ 5~~^dnE~S T~T,E~OPY NL~NIBE~2: 202-544-1465 SENDERS PHONE NVMSER: ~t?2-544~~,p~3 1 C nfUr~t~F~.R ~F PF,G~.~~ T~NSMrT?'E', ! ?NCS~UT~~NG C 'EF.) R. EMARK ~C1 c~uow~~a,~,~ -l~+iS ~'~x~ l~~ft<< we w~~~ Skt~n~.ls~e~ JJ otJ a hard ~vr y o~ i ~ a~~c~•-~~or~ . . . / s Post•it"` brand tax transmittal tame 78T1 + ~ p~ ~a9•• . ~ from b•pt. (Phan. # t=ax B ~ Fpz # Fri~7fJ1 t".CZ-~~4-tiD~l RS-Rt-,? R'1~'^,4 n-+ iii-i.i~-~1G l~;a~~ ~'11jI F~G~v'I T0~~1 ON AVi~r1 _ - - (JdfOlf9~ 18:50 '~2t;i:: X44 1~!!i5 LIB RQBBINS A550 ~ C~jOt~3 ~i>alilLlgtOn L.l~~i-~ ~~~SJ1~ ~M~~+ i~~ '~~~°U77iull'gtll Jr~ Rcprcacnt;~ti1~c~ ~/nshin~ton. ~Clb03 Talnpl.~„a r i 1 1, 19 9 ~ 202; 5~-609s p Mr• . harry err~~sKs `~e~wn Of Avon F.O. Box 97°~ Avon, Ca ~~.~?~0 Dear Mr. Ba~a~?ke: As wa discussed, the fa1].awing i® our proposed cauree of w[rrk. fc~r the Town of Avon in it$ rol~a as the admin~.etsatcar of ties tra~nait sy®t®m f©r Avon, Eagl~c County, and otk~as affiliated ~uriedictions. W® prdposm to begin working for Avon a~a aeon a,s poa~ib].e, but a~a .Later than th® anfl oP Apr11. Sn order to eL~ry~ed en .Av®a' ~ bmria"_~ we must begin cu:~ efforts bsfare the a~;p~op~,~.ations Comm~.ttes tis• trie House and lS~fi~ttt~ have finalized their doclsiatas~ about f~tnci .gig" . rc?°+° :te for th~a ~'Y ' 93 bi11. That iaroces~ has a1.r~afly b®gua~, ~anc~ St~A`s~~ m~r~.bara will Piave already made requ~ats to the subc~~,~„„ittee Por transit projeots. Than i~ a limit to the ~•~•~.~:,er of ~e~ague~t~. ghat may be accaiamc~dated, sinc® there is only a finite ~mc~u~°'' a~' unsay avai],abXe. wa must make s high priority rwqueat b~~'osc~ taco ~€a't°•y other GQm~titm+ants are made. While it is posa?ible tra e~uccaed goes in late, it i~ much more di£ficul.t to do sa, and we .~d sath~r avoid the vhax~ae Qf ~a~.lux•e b}r m~k.ing the requ®gt in ~.i~ v fashion. gh~ul~? point rut that "reeking the request?? is $ sh ,~•t c~eoeptive term, in that the mattoer is nc+t such a eimp?+~ ~'a sucC.eed in gaining an ~aa~rmar]c, w~? moat Pint GjA~,.~,~~ ~~:..:h information as possible on what other rsquaets ~ ; } • cc~rttutittee information that is aonfidenti~?1 and , we must Rine up the appropriate euppart both ~rzf.~:` •.,~e commit.te+~ before making any approach, so that th~-~ c~~L~-J~~°rr.•~w~.%: Muff will tak~? the rec~ueet reriau~ly. We will need up support among the subcommittee membr~ar®. In a,da~ °".I.aI~ ~a~ will need tv rapproac~h the subcommittee chaisd~~an and r~nki~ ~ a~inar~~.ty members personally, and us® our pax•soaa'~ relationehipsf in order to mako Avorr'a pro~e~ct a priority zn an a1®ction y®ar. sf succ®ssful in subcommittee, wa must mak® sure that na problems arise in full c+ammitt+~e ar an tYie floor. Whils it is unu$ua,1 fqr the •tull committee to overturn a subconunittee dteciei®n, ahal3.eng®s on the floor, particular~.y by Republicans against "s~armaxked" projects are mor® anti more Common acrd sc~metima+~ suc~oaecf~' , Finally, ws must pursue this c~aurse of action in bath the Hausa the S~ttatie, xn order to m~a;~imixe the ahsract+s of the project receiving the blessing of thy: conference cammittsae when the Ho~.s~: and ~araate~ apprapriatiat~a :?~~=r y~~~s wr.ita they final. bill. FRC~N± ZQ2-~~~^i4fi~ 'i4•-~1-:+? F~ ~t~R G-• . fly.-I11'-~%' 1%:4~_~ P1~~ F~F~UI `~'~4NIli OF~ ~,V~~1_~ F'~~~~, n4/01;'82 1S; S1 '~''20L S44 1406 LIZ RoBBINS A5Sn f~}Op3 ~ Thin proces,~ ig at course comp].icat~cd by the fact that there no Colorado msa~tber on the Hausa tranaportativra a~?prapxiat~,ans subcammittse, and no Col~,rado member of the senate Apprnpriatione Committee. consequently, we will have tr, interest oth®r znambara in the pro~aat. '~hia will not be as easy ag it was with the veil effort, beaauas the +'publlc ps~lioy" justification we gave far that ~.ject was part7,y that the buses w®re Headed to aocommcadate „ ::iti~,nal v3.sitors at the C~4rld Ski championships. Our scope of work, t~~an, w~.ll ba to pursue ap~ardpriations langua.ga in the ~Iouss and the senato which aaxmarks Department of Transportation UMTA funds for the acguisitxr~n of up to a~.x busses far ~?vc~n and E~ag~.e County ~.n F'Y ' 93 despite the feat that the system is net in operation year round, We anticip~;te language in the cpmmittme report which indiante~ thy: committesa's support cf fund~,ng and which removes any ether impgdimOnts the current reg~ulatians may pass to funding the syste+an. This is the normal methr~d whereby the Appropr~.ations Committee earmarks transportation fundin+~, and i~ sufficient to cause poi' to fund th.e pro~act. WE antic~.pate beginning c+ur efforts as soon as yvu authorize. 6+~e wi~.l repr®sent the tov~rt tttr®ugh the Qnd of the Congressic~~s~ ~ er~aaior~, which we antioxpate wild end fn the middle of QatQbar. 1'` there is a lame-duc}t seasiotx after the election, anc~ the is~rue i~ Hat decided oaf oxe then, we will continua tca reprase:nt Avon through the end of the +~urrant session ref Congress with. no addition to our fss, our normal hourly fags f"a~r private busines~a cYients is $~aG.Oo for 1~e. Robbing s,nd ~2~0. Qq ter aasaciate~. F`r~l n~+n-profits and local. goverris«ents, we charge a redt~aed fee a..~ sap expenditures by working on either a retainer ba®ia with n ~ 3.imit an hs~urs to be spent, We propose to represent Avon on this basis. Fvr representation through the end cf the Congrsasional ~ess~c?i1, we will charge a retainer of $45, qpD. na paid in equal .instU..~m~:ntc~ upon billing. Rs indicated above, billing will continua through the month of batober and i.f cc,~igresa stays ire seep; beyond tx;at and hoe not fin~,l~.zed ~'Y ' 93 tranapoxtatibn f~:nding, we wz.ll cc~ntinugi to represent the town thrQUgh the end of the s®assic~n with Mo addi.tional charge. We wi1~.l aha.rga no ex~rense~a. ~n add~i.tic~n, if ws dt~ not suaoeed in gaining language for Avon in either the Hours or ~anate apprc~priat.ions bill, we wi~.l notify yQU and you may choose to terminate th+~ contract at that point. We will know the status of bath houses' bills before thw end of October, and m4~st ` a~c+aly will know it around the end of August. We can, of course, provide no $bs~alute guarantee oi* suCcea~:. NQ fizz can. However, our record at' success in transportation mg~~ars, as we11 as for groups a.nd localities in E~.gle County, is, ;~rarx°~cly, perfect. We have never pug®ued any txanspcartafi;ior~ appropriations matter, z~or any legislative end®avor foe any entity in Eagle County, without succ$eding. While it is pvssa.ble that th~.s record may at some time be braker?, ws ;iPva n4 reaso7~ to a,ntioipate it ocQurring this time. We wAUld. not und$rtake tQ - ne--ni-_. .I?~:R ne.r IIT-f12-'.'~? I ~ ; r'IUl FFSOh~i TIJNd1~1 i]I+ p,~lii~ r'll~ 0=i/G1iR: 1x::51 X3`20: X44 1483 LIZ ROBBIti9 :~~Sp 1~i004 Y., , repxa~Qnt yQU if wa had not f izat ~.ho:~aur~h~.y ra®~ar~had the likAl~.hvod cif sut~aa~a and ~oncludad that wa hid ~z~ exoall~nt ahaMCa c~~ aua~aading. Ws hcaps to ha~re the c~ppartunity to work with you thi6 year, and we we?it to hear from you at your ear~ie~t ~onver~iano~. Sinoaraly, ~ITAR~I~I EDW,AFtDS LEGIS~?TYVE D1~EC'1't~R ~?~r. 2C2..gy~-1a55 04:0'.-`j 1~;~~; rfi~a~ ~li1VVI'd OF AilO~d 04/01/92 15:50 'b`202 344 1465 LIZ Rl1BBIYS.e1S50 1~J001 . 1'r~a,~:1i-~;:,n i,I~ ~tlJ.~~l~T~7 L 1~~V~~~~~~J a~U7'"5ireriSE ttcprr^tsciti~a Wo~hington, bC 3~Qf}3 Teier-. •~r 302 5- aUy? ~a~~ a X37 TELEOOPY TRANSMITTAL Ct7VER BgLDT SATE : ~ ~(I / ~+4 wo: M~, ~~~Y T3~aai~'S FROM : ~ ~v~1'1~j7 S TELECOPY N[JMSER: ~a~~..~'~~ Q I39 ~ ~ - ~ . SENDERS TELECQPY NUMBER: 20Z-544-1465 SENDERS PHONE f~UMBF.~'t: 2C}Z-544-6093 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' .NUMBER QF P~,GES mI'tANSMITTEL (INCLUDZNG~CO ER} : ~ _ - ' . REMARXS : "To ca,ar,~w,~,~ ~MtS ~ax•~? ~c.tt~~r we w<« bt 5hip~;,~ `1 ~ O U G. ~''lkra GOP V t?f c 4' i~ ~lrsfnACh . i -..y. • ~.~~~G r~",~~'~ , ` ~ ~ ~ Post-ItTM brand- flax transmittal memo 78'Ti' ~ 01 p•ga . I~ t1?A~,?~,c Prom U110~..--c c r j - .I~•pt. Phonra . F-'~ VON` . - R^"~_- r 0`~' ~Oy/01/9?. 13:30 $`20: 344 1163 LIZ ROBBIA1S :~s5n ~ ~pp2 Washington I.,z~ Ra~$~~s A~sSac~AT~s SZU 7''~ stradt 3E Rcprescntati~ca 'Washinstca, DC ~OOQ3 Talapl;~ur: Apr i Z 1 19 9 ~ 2021 ~ ~-6093 ~ Mr . Larry BrbYS3{l~ _ Town Ot Avon P.O. Box 97a Avon, C0 8162a Dear Nir. 8rocks: - As we discussed, the tal].owing is r~ur prvpased course of work for the Town vt Avon in its rote ats the adminietratQr of the transit system for Avon, Eagle County, and other ~ffiliatsd jurisdictions. We propose to begin working for Avon as aeon as possible, but nv later than the and oP April. Sn order to suacaed onaAvon~e bohalf, " We must begin our efforts before the appropriation® Committee in the House and Senate have finalized their deaisiang about funding - projects for the FY '93 bill. That process rise already begun, and - many members will have already made requests to the subcoz:mtittee . for transit pro j acts . Them is a. limit to the number of r~tqueste that may be accommodated, sines there is only a finite amount of mar~~ay available. we must make a high priority r®queat before tQO many other c~„~,.itmants are made. While it is possibly to succeed - if one go+~s in late, it is much ware difficult to da eo, and we would rather avoid the chance of fa~.lur® by making the request in - _ a timely fashion:. I should point out that '~makinq the raquest~T is a some~rhat dviceptiv term, in that the. matter is not such a aimpl4 one. To succeed in gaining an ®armark, we must f iret gain ag much information as possible on what other rsque:st~ are before th® committee information that is confidential and hard to uncover. we must line up the apprapr~,ate support both off and on the committee before making any approach, ass that the committee staff wi11 take the rtqueet seriously. We wi11 need tv line up support among the subcommittee member®. In addition, we will need to - approaah the subcommittee chairmen and ra,-3}sing minority members personally, and use our personal relationships, in order to make Avon~s project a priority in an election year. Yf successful in subcommittee, ws must make sure that t1o prableme " arise in full committee or on the floor. While it ie unusual tar the fu11 committee to overturn a subcommittee decision, challenges on the floor, particularly by Republicans against ~~aarmarksd" projects are more and more common and sometimes successful. - finally, we must pursue this cauraa of action in both the House and the senate, in order to maximize the chances of the project receiving the blessing of the conf'erancv co~tmittae when the House and Senate apprapriatiarcac members write fns final bi11. _.~~r` s - _ ~ ,w - ~ _.r O 1 _(Ir _I'~ 1 ~ ~1 , !4_1!~~tl •~I_ 4~N h ~,]~)r1 ,IJ VL '04~O1i92 iS:Si 'b`2op S44 i:~OS LIZ RoBBI~s :~SSo X003 This process ig a2 cvurs~ cvmp].icatad by the .fact that there is no Colorado member an the Kousa~ tranaportation appropriations subcommittee, and no Colorado member of the Senate Appropriations Cammittoe. consec~v,®ntiy, we will have to interaffit other members in the project. This will not 'be as easy ag it was with the v~il._~. effort, because the "public policy~~ justification we gave for that project wag partly that the busses were needed to accommodate additional visitors at the World ski Champisnships. Qur scoFa of work, t~Lsn, w~.11 be to pursue appropriations language in the Hou®a and the Senate which earmarks Department of Transportation UMTA funds for th® acquisition of up to six busses fcr Avon and EaQ~.e County in FX '93 d~spits the Fact that the _ system is net in eperz~tion year xound. Wa anticipate language in tYae committee r~,port which inda.cates the camm.itt~ae ~ s support of funding and which removes any other impedimant~c the current ~ regulations may pose to funding the system. This is the normal method whereby the Appropriations Cammittcs earmarks transportation ~ tundzns~, and is cuff icier~t to cause DOT to fund the pro j act . 1 Wa anticipate beginning our efforta~ as soon as you authorize. ~e f wi~.l representt the town through the and of tie Carrgresaional ~ s8s®ion, which we arttio~.pata will. end in the middlQ of Qctober. If there is a lame-duck session after the alaation, and the issue is not decided before then, we will aontinus tcrepr~sent Avon through . the end of the Ourrant session of Congress with no addition to our fas. . our normal hourly f eo far private business clients is $300.Oo for • ~s. Robbins and $2SO.QC for associates. For non-profits and local goveznm®nts, we charge a reduced fee and oap expenditures by working on either a retainer basis with no limit vn hours to bo spent. we propose to ~repr®sent Avon on this basis. For represantatiori through the +snd of the Caagrsssiana2 session, we wizl charg4 a rotainar of $45, 000. oa paid. in equal ~.nstallz~entg upon billing. As indicated ax~ove, billing •~aill continue through the month ag batob®r and ~.f Congress stays in session beyond ti~$t and has not finalized FY '93 transportatioM funding, wa will continua to represent the town through the end of the session with no additional charge, We will charge no expenses; In addition, if w® dt~ not succ$ed in gaining languaga~ tar Avon in ether the House or S®nnta apgrapriatiorts bill, we wi~.l notSfy yQU and you may choose to terminato the contract at that point.. we will know the status of both house® ~ bills before the •ttd of October, and moat likaly~will know it around the end of August. F We can, of course, g~rovide no absolute guarantee gf suocests. No i'irm can. However, our rscard of success in transportation matters, as well as for graup$ and localities in Eagle, County, ia, Frankly, perfect. We have never pursued any transportation appropriations matter, nor any legislative endeavor f'or any entity in Eagle County, without suaceedi.ng. While it iat possible that this r®cord stay at sazns time be broken, wa have no reason to anticipate it occurring this time. We would not undertake to 04-02-'.)2 12: r~~~ FR+)~4 TuP1Pd OF AVGrd rQ4 Q4/O1/8b 15:51 $Y0? 344 1483 LIZ ROBBI~S ~SSQ F X1004 repraasnt ypu if we had trot lix~st 'th®rough~~r r~seax'ched th® liJr®lihood success and ~onc~luded that we had an exc®I1ent chai7ca o~ suaceed~.ng. W+ hops tv have the opportunity to word with you this year, and we wait to hear from you at ~rour ear7.iest certveniencs. Sincerely, ~HAR9N ~DW,~RDS . I,LGISL~ITYV.E DIRECTOR t ~ ' - _ - A - + ~ T 'fS I~ _ , z 1 ~ - tom: `.j,:. -:9~t ;a. ::c:~.r~a..~: - ~ - Y. ~kT r ~ COMP~I~Y February 20, 1992 Mr. Ron Phillips Town Manager Town of Va i 1 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Ron: Enclosed is the summary report from the Goal-Setting Workshop conducted on February 18. I suggest that you distribute this report to Council as appropriate and schedule follow-up sessions with Council and the Administrative Staff to develop a final list of goals for the Town of Vail and subsequent implementation strategies. It is important that the goals be officially adopted and widely disseminated throughout the community. It is equally important that specific implementation plans be developed for the systematic achievement of each goal. This is especially true given the profound strategic nature of some of the goals which will require extensive negotiations toward new governance arrangements, expanding resource availability, and the garnering of public enthusiasm and support for the commitments necessary for achieving the proposed Town of Vail goals. In a recent telephone conversation with Pam, I proposed that a • forum be established in the near future at which the Eagle County Commissioners and the Councils of Vail and Avon can share their respective goals toward establishing shared objectives and commitments. It seems to me, based upon my knowledge of your proposed goals and those of Eagle County, that some significant breakthroughs can be achieved rather quickly that would establish a whole new consciousness about leadership for the future of the entire Gore Valley and Eagle County areas. If I may be of assistance to you in completing the follow-up steps, please do not hesitate to contact me. Also, if you would like to discuss some of these ideas via telephone, please call me at 986- 8487. ? Pro-Med Management Division ~ Government Leadership Division ? General Management Systems Division 8169 WestBaker Avenue Lakewood, Colorado 80227 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 36308 Lakewood, Colorado 80236 Telephone: 303!986-8487 Mr. Ron Phillips February 20, 1992 Page -2- It was a pleasure having the opportunity to work with you, the Town Council, and the outstanding Administrative Staff of the Town of Vail. Sincerely Carl H. Neu, Jr. CHN:amb Enclosure P.S. Ron, I forgot to mention in the report that I think that the number of goals should not exceed 8 to 10 for the Town of Vail. Therefore, out of the list of 21 proposed goals, the final list should be boiled down to 8 to 10 goals to which the Town of Vail Council is willing to make an asserted commitment for their attainment. ~ COMPANY RE~'~ FE8 2 4 1992 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO SIJNB~IARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS .AND OBSERVATIONS TOWN COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATION • GOAL-SETTING WORKSHOP CONDUCTED ON FEBRUARY 18, 1992 ° SUMMARY PREPARED BY CARL NEU NEU & COMPANY LAKEWOOD, COLORADO FEBRUARY 19, 1992 ? Pro-Med Management Division ? Government Leadership Division ? General Management Systems Division 8169 West Baker Avenue Lakewood, Colorado 80227 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 36308 Lakewood, Colorado 80236 Telephone: 303/986-8487 TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO SUMMARY OF~KEY CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS TOWN COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATION GOAL-SETTING WORKSHOP I. INTRODUCTION On February 18, 1992, the Town Council and key members of the Administrative Staff participated in a Goal-Setting Workshop as a sequel to the Council - Manager Team-Building Workshop conducted on January 28. The purpose of this workshop was to establish a preliminary set of proposed goals that would guide Council and Administration priorities and activities for the next three- to five-year period. II. KEY OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Exploration of Visions for Vail in the Year 2000 and Beyond 1. The visioning process Any strategic planning process which eventually leads to definition of goals and implementation work plans usually starts with clarifying a common vision held by the involved parties as to what future outcomes should be for their organization. In the case of a community such as Vail, this process involves asking the participants to envi- sion their community at a given time; in this case, the year 2000 or beyond. Each of the participants from the Town Council and Administrative Staff were involved in defining as graphically as possible their respective visions for the future of Vail in terms of what the commu- nity would be like in character, makeup, physical attributes, population density, economic base, etc. The purpose of these vision drawings was to permit a sharing of individual perspectives as the basis for defining common elements which could be framed into performance goals and implementation plans. 2. Elements common to the vision drawings The following elements were common to a majority of the vision drawings presented by the participants: - a. Extensive landscaping throughout the communi- ty. b. An emphasis on high-quality recreation. c. Establishment of a "common" Valley government. d. Stabilizing the local population. e. Availability of affordable housing and employ- ee housing. f. Stream walk and recreation paths, g. Mass transit. h. No cars (cars are invisible within Vail) - truck loading. i. More public land (dedica.tion of land for public use). j. Emphasis on year-around activities so that tourist capacity could be used fully through- out the year. k. Connecting of the ski areas; i.e., Beaver Creek, Vail, Copper Mountain, etc. 1. Clean air and management of the factors af- fecting air quality. m. Recycling. n. Need for minor redevelopment to occur in certain parts of the community. o. Conference and Community Center. p. Quality guest services (quality demonstrated through behavior and attitudes of people). q. Establishing a 24-hour Information Center. r, Cleanliness of the entire community. s. Streetscaping with particular emphasis on I- 70, t. Cemetery. 2 u, Population of the Town of Vail to be approxi- mately 4,000 to 4,500; population of the extended Vail area may reach as high as 25,000. v. Diversification of the economy by bringing in clean industry, think-tanks, etc. w. Public art. x. Environmental consciousness and preservation of. the environmental heritage of the area (balancing environmental concerns with the benefits of development). 3, Critical strategic factors which must be addressed- /managed . The process of strategic leadership thinking re- quires the development of an understanding of those fundamental strategic factors which are the "desti- ny shapers" of the community and which must be managed or influenced by the community if it is to achieve its envisioned future. Quite frequently, the typical decision-making processes used within a community tend not to get at these fundamental factors to the degree necessary to truly guide the destiny of a community toward its desired future. Some of the fundamental key strategic factors identified by the group include: a. Control of land for public uses and future development.. b. Control of future housing development. c, Keeping the "locals" in the Valley. d. Control of fundamental transportation issues necessary for establishment of mass transit, etc. e. Gaining support among the public through developing consensus and collaboration of public and political bodies that-will bring about a form of government necessary to guide the future of the entire Vail Valley. f. Availability of funding and other resources essential to achievement of community goals. 3 g. The active participation and support of Vail Associates and utilities. h. Establishing public/private/community partner- ships. i. Developing mechanisms that will bring about a consolidation of regional services in areas such as public works, fire, police, libraries, while still preserving the unique identities and elements of each of the communities. j. Commitment to a future-oriented thinking and leadership that will permit more aggressive programs in housing, public land purchases, transportation, developing a year-around economy, environmental issues, recreation, aesthetics, pedestrian amenities, and land- scape improvements. k. Willingness to incur debt to achieve benefits essential to the ,future. 1. Nurturing a good relationship with federal and state highway departments for achieving the streetscaping of I-70. . B. Proposed Goals for the Town of Vail Based upon the discussions described above, the following goals were proposed for the Town of Vail. Once the goals were proposed, each of the participants was given an opportunity to identify his/her "top six" high-priority goals. Listed after each goal in parenthesis is the number of Councilmembers and the number of Administrative Staff members who identified the goal as one of his/her "top six" high-priority goals. The proposed goals are: 1. Investigate mechanisms and initiate within two years a Valley-wide approach to providing services under one umbrella organization to solve common problems, avoid duplication, and improve the value delivered for tax dollars spent. (Councilmembers - S; Administrative Staff - 10) 2. Acquire land as required for future employee hous- ing, transportation needs, open space requirements, and other public purposes. (Councilmembers - 5; Administrative Staff - 12) 4 3. Increase the greening-of Gore Valley by planting. trees, shrubs, and flowers with a special emphasis on the I-70 Corridor. (Councilmembers - 4; Admin- istrative Staff - 12) 4. Keep Vail Associates locally owned and operated. (Councilmembers - 4; Administrative Staff - 1) 5. Build Town of Vail employee housing at Buzzard Park. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff - 1) 6. Construct a Performance Art and Conference Center as a Valley-wide joint venture within the next four years. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff - 10) 7. Facilitate construction of 100-300 units of loca l housing within the Gore Valley within the next five years - 50 to 75 units to be built within the next year. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff - 5) 8. Become a leader among communities by implementing an environmental strategic plan to address air quality, water quality, recycling, and chemical use. (Councilmembers - 3; Administrative Staff - 4) 9. Provide land, joint financing, and a positive atmosphere for employer controlled .housing that will always be owned by the Town of Vail and built by the private sector. (Councilmembers - 3; Admin- istrative Staff - 0) 10. Create a special Tourist District within the next two years within Eagle County and establish a business license fee for the purpose of funding marketing. (Councilmembers - 2; Administrative Staff - 1) 11. Implement a Village and Lionshead delivery plan which is as near vehicle free as possible. (Coun- cilmembers - 2; Administrative Staff - 2) 12. Implement continuing quality improvement programs for, all Town of Vail systems; i.e., the Deming approach. (Councilmembers - 1; Administrative Staff - 2) 13. Improve and expand guest services and economic base with increased commitment to quality and Town of 5 Vail and private sector projects, including mainte- nance. (Councilmembers - 1; Administrative Staff - 2) 14. Complete Valley-wide biking, walking, and country trail systems over the next five years. (Council- members - 1; Administrative Staff - 7) 15. Enlarge Town of Vail revenues without increasing taxes by controlling Gore Valley utilities, includ- ing the ski mountain. (Councilmembers - 1; Admin- istrative Staff - 0) 16. Develop a master plan for the redevelopment of Lionshead to take place over the next three years. (Councilmembers - 1; Administrative Staff - 0) 17. Enlist public and private funding cooperation for achievement of Town of Vail goals. (Councilmembers - 0; Administrative Staff - 2) 18. Increase areas for pedestrian and enhance existing pedestriah areas, (Councilmembers - 0; Administra- tive Staff - 1) ' 19. Complete financing/implementation schedule and initiate at least one improvement in each of the following program areas within the next three years: m Transportation Streetscaping Environmental policy (Councilmembers - 0; Administrative Staff - 6) 20, Work toward the creation of a year all.-around economy. (Councilmembers - 0; Administrative Staff - 9) 21. Ensure that guests can comfortably and economically come to Vail and ensure that transportation within EdvonaVail is simple. (Councilmembers - 0; Admin- istrative Staff - 2) Footnote: The following item was identified as a desired implementation step for Goal No. 2: "Control 30 acres of developable land over the next three years within the Gore Valley." 6 It should be remembered that the list of goals outlined above is preliminary in nature and subject to~refinement, consolidation, and rewording upon further consideration by Council in dialogue with Staff. III. NEXT STEPS A. Preparing Final Goal Statements It is recommended that the preliminary set of goals be reviewed and refined into a final list of goals to be adopted by the Town Council through Resolution. The goals that should appear on that list should be those to which the Town Council is committed over the next three- to five-year period. B. Developing Implementation Strategies, Revenue Policies, and Management Action Plans (MAPS) . Listed on the next page is a flow chart of the goal- setting process as it evolves from a vision statement into specific annualized work plans and budgets. It is recommended that for each goal, the following be estab- lished: 1. A general statement of implementation strategies to be followed in pursuit of achieving the goal. 2. A clear definition of resource/revenue policy that will ensure adequate funding and resource avail- ability to pursue the goal aggressively. 3. Definition of annualized performance objectives for at least the next two- to three-year period which will serve as the basis for annual departmental work planning and budget preparation. 4. Clear assignment of responsibilities to individ- uals/departments that will have primary oversight for the achievement of the goal. 5. Establishment of evaluation criteria and appropri- ate monitoring processes that will permit periodic review of goal achievement status and assessment of the outcomes achieved. Contained in the last pages of the Participant Workbook used at the February 18 workshop are examples of this process as implemented in the Town of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. 7 C. The goal list,~once defined and adopted by Council, should be publicized widely throughout the community as the basis for ensuing dialogues between Council and other leadership groups throughout the community and the entire Gore Valley. 8 A MUNICIPAL GOAL - SETTING PROCESS There are a number of approaches to conducting goal-setting sessions for a community. A particular approach, that has proven to be very popular, is designed to address the following key areas: 1. Definition of a strategic vision for the community which serves as the basis for goal-setting and performance-planning to be used by the governing body and the administrative staff. 2. Identification of~major "consensus points" held by a majority of the governing body relative to its vision for the future of the community. - 3. Identification of critical issues and strategic performance factors which are the "destiny shapers" of the community. These critical issues and stra- tegic performance factors generally represent areas that must be addressed or managed by the governing body and the city's executive team if the community is to attain its vision for the future. 4. Defining specific outcomes that the council wishes to achieve relative to each of the critical issues and strategic performance factors. Once these specific outcomes have been defined, a careful identification needs to be made of all forces and factors working "for" and "against" attainment of these critical outcomes by the governing body, the city administration, and other leadership groups within the community that can contribute to the attainment of these specific outcomes., 5. Establishing specific performance goals that will - lead to the attainment of the desired outcome and define general policies, leadership directions, and performance priorities for the city. 6. Establishing revenue-and resource allocation poli- ties to ensure the continuous availability of the necessary resources to achieve specific performance goals established by.the council. 7, Assigning, if appropriate, specific responsibili- ties that. must exist within the council, between council and the administrative staff, within the administrative staff, and between the city and other significant leadership groups throughout the community if each of the goals is to be achieved. 9. 8. Establishing for each goal a set of annualized performance objectives and supporting Management Action Plans (MAPS) designed to ensure achievement of community-wide goals in a systematic manner that guides operating-programs and priorities for the council and administrative staff. 9. Establishing a goal-management and monitoring process which permits the governing body and admin- istrative staff to have a comprehensive and coordi- nated view of all of its strategic, tactical, and operational efforts. 10. Identification of "breakthrough leadership targets" which reflect significant issues that do not seem to lend themselves to traditional decision-making practices and administrative procedures. These issues, frequently, are really ones that require extraordinary insight and commitment for their resolution. As such, these issues require whole new levels of thinking and perspective which must be integrated back into the goal-setting and MAP- ping process. 11. Conducting an initial assessment of the current quality and extent of governing body-administrative staff teamwork essential for goal achievement. Frequently, a community will have an outstanding set of goals and supporting objectives. However, difficulties may arise in the implementation phases due to factors reflecting the level and quality of teamwork existing between groups that must work in a collaborative manner. 12. Establishing communications processes through which the critical issues, specific performance outcomes, goals, and MAPS are communicated throughout the community so that all leadership groups and citi- zens have a full appreciation for the direction the city is taking and the role they have in the a- chievement of its goals. 10. VISION P E I MISSION & LEADERSHIP /OPERATING PHILOSOPHY R S KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES & CRITICAL OUTCOMES 1 P E GOALS & STRATEGIES C ~ T ~ REVENUE /RESOURCE POLICIES I V l MANAGEP~1ENT ACTION PLANS (MAPS) E 1 I i• ~ i I S YEAR I YEAR 2 YEAR 3 f YEAR ~I } ~ YEAR 5 I ~ ~ • I I. 1 • ( ANNUALIZED OPERATING PLANS ~ BUDGETS, ETCI, ) .l- ,L_ -L I FEEDBACK R. EVALUATION PROCEDURES TIME ti PLAN FORMAT 1. Issue 2. Background Information . 3. Critical Outcome(s) That Are Desired 4. Specific Goals and Strategies to Be Used to Achieve Critical Outcome(s) 5. Revenue/Resource Policies to Support Outcome - Goal Attainment 6. Annualized Management Action Plans a. Performance Objectives b. Key Action Steps c. Staff Responsibility Charting (Assignments) d. Budgets (Operating and Capital) e. Evaluation Criteria f. Other Considerations 12. Vail Valle S eeial p events ~®rnmissi®r~ ~ Special Event Funding Request Summary Name of Event: CELESTIAL SEASONINGS BICYCLE CLASSIC Date of Event: AUGUST 20-23, 1992 Sponsoring Organization: U.S. EVENTS, INC. /CELESTIAL SEASONINGS Chairperson or Contact: TED MARTIN Amount of Request: $ 7,500.00 This request has been: approved; _XX_ denied; modified to the following terms: The rationale for this determination is based on the following: Our basic philosophy at the WSEC is to assist new event opportunities and events without adequate sponsorship with seed money until they can be self-sustaining. For this reason, the consensus is that additional cash assistance to your event beyond the $14,000-$17,000 direct contribution from Town of Vail and Vail Associates does not seem appropriate at this time. Subnsitted by Vail Valley Special Events Commission Thomas J. B ' z Chairman VAIL VALLEY SPECIAL EVENTS COMMISSION MEMORANDIIM APRIL 14, 1992 TO: Ted Martin, U.S. Events, Inc. FROM: Tom Britz, Chairman, Vail Valley Special Events Commission/~~ SUBJECT: Funding Request for the Celestial Seasonings - Bicycle Classic in the amount of $7,500.00 Ted, the Commission is unanimous in their support for the Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic and the positive values it will bring to the Vail Valley community. However, your funding request has been denied because it was felt that the Town of Vail, which is already supplying $8,000 to $10,000 of support in out-of-pocket work, and Vail Associates, which is supplying an additional $6,200 of support in out-of-pocket work, has demonstrated a significant financial contribution to the event. The Vail Valley wants to continue their support of this event on an ongoing basis and as you're aware, the larger the event becomes, the more significant the out-of-pocket cash contribution will be, reflecting actual, (not marked up) costs. We also realize that~the actual out-of-pocket contribution from both the Town of Vail and Vail Associates could be higher than -the estimates given. . Our basic philosophy at the WSEC is to assist new event opportunities and events without adequate sponsorship with seed money until they can be self-sustaining. For this reason, the consensus is that additional cash assistance to your event beyond the $14,000-$17,000 direct contribution from Town of Vail and Vail Associates does not seem appropriate at this time. We want everyone to understand that we are recommending to the Town of Vail that they continue their strong support in the future; particularly as this event grows. We want to make certain that if the event grows to the proportions of the old Coors Classic, and the job to pull off the event grows incrementally, that you receive the continued out-of- pocket support of the Town of Vail. Thank you for the time ,you took. in filling out the funding application and answering our questions pertaining to it. We've taken your request quite seriously and as a Commission have spent over six hours discussing your request over the course of three meetings trying to reach a fair and equitable conclusion. Best of luck in having a~successful and ongoing Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic. ~ y VAIL VALLEY SPECIAL EVENTS COMMISSION, Minutes,April 8,1992 „ Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room Present Tom Britz - Vail Valley Marketing Board Kent Gubler - Avon Steve Lorton - Vail Associates ' Margie Plath - Vail Ken White - Vail Tom Britz called the meeting to order. The minutes of the April 1,1992 meeting were read and approved. A. The commission reviewed the funding request of the Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic for $7500.00. Steve Lorton estimated that Vail Associates contribution of work in kind is valued at $6200. Ken White will meet with Pam Brandmeyer to determine the estimated value of the Town of Vail support to the .event for items such as security,clean up,emergency services etc. The funding application stated the funding would be used to offset television costs and provide Vail with inserts in television and other media.(See Attachment) In the future the event would be requesting a $7500.00 site fee to offset television/media costs.. The commission feels it is inappropriate for the Town of Vail to pay a special event a site fee. After determining what the Town of Vail and Vail Associates are contributing to this event for work in kind, a final decision will be made on this request at our next meeting. ' B. The commission discussed the need to work closely with the Vail Recreation District. Lori Asmussen of the V.R.D. will be invited to our next meeting to discuss this issue. . C. John Garnsey - Vail Valley Foundation and the Vail Recreation District will be added to our minutes distribution list. D. Our next meeting is scheduled for April 14,1992 in the Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room at 7:30 A.M. The proposed agenda will be: . 1. Decision on the Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic funding request. 2. Discuss our.relationship with the Vail Recreation Disrict. APR-14-1992 08:56 FROM TO 14792157 P. 01 BOLT & ASSQCIATES, A ~ROFES5IO~VA1. ~ORPORAT~O~1 ~ : rc r ~TTORIV~'t'S AND C0IAMSIr6AR3 61T LAW R v'i° 800 PENN Cf=NTER 1301 PElIiNSYLVRNIA $TR~Et DENVER, GOLORRDP $02Q3 iso~ set-7aoo PaCSIM4E {303) 883.7521 PLEASE DELIV~~ IMMEDIATELY TO THE FOLLQWING: Larry Fslcwi~th. To ~ ~ ~ ~ To Zt's~+m. of .Vail r1 +y Ati-~xt~y':s Of~i.c~e COMp/+iVY COMPANY 1-479-ZIS7 FAX NInrtBEA FAXtVuM9ek 111:00 a.m. TIME SETJT TIME SENT To TO COMPANY COMPANY FAX NUMB(:R FAX NUMBER TIME SENT TIME $ENT I IF YOU EXPERIENCE ANY PROBLEMS IN RECEIVING TM7=SE PAGE. PLEASE CALL (309) Bet-7~D A9 sooty A3 Po9918LE THANK YOU. FROM: TY~w~ Holt SECRETARY: biar~ DATE: a/.1412~ PAGES: 4 (INCLUDING COVER F'AGiE) RE: Mid1~1 Barber Arc~itecturelVail TrcLnsM,~ ;atioaz CLIENT NO.' 10470.03.8 QOMMENTS: please c~liver 1>ml9dlataly upoal r~a~i~t t0 LaT2y E~kwith. ~7a11k yb'[l. A't}' - ' ~«.,.[i~2 l~af~ ~"T 7 i ~ A~21t~1]f CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED FACSIMILE COMMUNICATION THE INFORMATION CONTAIN601N THIS FAC$IMiLE TRANSIwISS10N AND THEACCOMPANYING~PAGE5l5 INTENDED $OLE1.Y FOR THE ADDRESSEE(S) NAMEDABOVE. IF YOU ARE NOT AN ADDRE55EE. QR RESPONSBLE FOR p€LIVERING TFIESE OOCC7ME:NTS TO AN ADDRES$fiE. YOU NAVE RECEIVED TWIS DDCUMENT IN ERROR AND TOU ARE &TRICTLY PROHIBITED FROM READING OR DISCLOSING 1T. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED INTH15 DOCUMENT Is St7tlJE(:i IULEfiAL.LYENFOFICEADLGPRIVILE0E3.UNLL:JJYOUAREANADppE99Bfc.OpASSCCIATE.DWIT4tAN40bRE$6FFF[lRDFLIV6RYPURPOSES. YOU WILL VIOLATE THE6E PRIVILEGES !E YOU DO ANY7HINt3 WITH 7Ni5 DOCUMENT OR TFiE INFORMATION IT CONTAINS OTHER THAN CALLING ilAMEbIATELY AT THE NUMBER LISTED ABOVE AND RETURNINp TH19 dOCUtdENT TO US AT ONCE. APR-14-1992 08 56 FROM TO 14792157 P.02 RECEIVED A~'i~ 1 4 1992 ~zY~aa ~c~a~ This Tallinq Agreement ("Agreement"} is entered into as of trie 4th day of March, 1592 by and between Michael Barber Architecture ("8arbc~r"), a Colorado professional aorporatioa, and The Town of Vail, Colorado ( ~~vail") . This Agreement is betwsezl Barber and Vail exclusively and no other person ar parties may claim any rights, interest, or benefit hereunder. WHEREAS, in 1989, Vail undertook and commenced the renovation and expansion of the Vail Village Transportation Center ("Pro j ect : WHEREAS, on or about December 1.4, 1989, Vail entered into a contract with Barber to sexwe as the architect for the Project; ~4HEREAS, in november 199., Vail submitted correspondents: to Barber alleging increased casts due to alleged design errors and omissions ("dispute"); WHEREAS, the parties agreed to resolve the dispute through mediation being conducted as Case No. 77--174-0307--91 with the Amoxican Axhitratiort Association and coffinenainq en January ld, 1992 and ongoing as of the date oP the execution of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consid+?ration of the parties' forbearance from initiating for~aal legal proceedings against one another, at this time, Barber and Vail agree as follows: 1. To the extent, and only to the extent, that any applicable statute of limitations has not run, expired, or otherwise bcaome e~fQCtive so as to bar say claim arising out Of ' the dispute, Barber and Vail, as between themselves, agree that effective the date of this A~~~ement, all statutes of limitations applicable to arty claim aX~.sirtg Out of Qr related to the dispute shall be tolled from the cv,uwencement date of this Agreement until such claims axe resolved as set forth below. 2. If the parties fail to resolve the d3.spute through the currant mediation proceedings or if either party or both abandon the current mediation attempts, this Agroement shall cease to have force and effect as of the day either party or both expressly or impliedly indicate a desire to pease the mediation proceedings with na intent of ~~ntinuirtg the ourrestt mediation prt?ceeding~ and the applicable limitations period sha1J. begin to run on the date of the manifestation of the express or implied indication OP des3xe to cease. 3. In the ev$nt that any statute of l~.mitations applicable to the dispute has run, expired, or athet~wis+~ bpeome affective 80 as to bar any clauns arising out of the dispute prf.or to the date of this Agreement, this Agree~?ent sha~.1 not bar the assertion o£ APR-14-1992 68 57 FROM TO 14792157 P.03 that defense and sash party hereto sha11 have a1I rights and remedies available to ~.t with respect to that aerense just as if this Agreement had never been entexed into. 4. Any written notice required to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be hand-delivered or delivered qy certif~.ed mail, addressed as €ollows: If to Barber: L. Tyrone Holt, 8sq. Holt & Associates 900 Pena Center 13x1 Peririsylvania Street ~ienver, Colarad0 80203 ' Attorneys for Mioh$$I Barber Architecture, A Professional. Corporation If to Vail: pavid PTe~.ls, Esq. We11s, Love & Scoby X25 Canyon Boulevard Boulder, Colorado 80303 Attorneys for 7'he Torn Of Vail . 5. B'vthing in this Agraentent shall, constitute an ad~t~.ssion of lfability of any kind whatsoever by either Barber or Vai1.. 6. Individuals signing. this Agreement fln behalf of 8asber and Vail hereby warrant that they haves the full right, powar, and authority to enter f.nto thfs Agreemetat, thereby binding their respective party to the texma hereof. 7. This Agrcc~ent shall be interpreted pursuant t,o the laws of the State of Colorado. 8. should thiE Agreement be breached, repudiated, or otherwise violated, all oasts and expenses, inaludiMg attt~rney's fees incurred fox litigation, arbitration, or other means of dispute resol~atYar, for the enforonmont oP this Agreement shall be awarded to the non-l?rearhi.ng party . 9. Should this ,agrQement k~e breached, repudiated, or otherwise violated, this Agreement shall eat act as a bar to any claims Or counterclaims asserted by the non-breaching party. APR-14-1992 08 58 FROM 1"0 14792157 P.04 IA. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a writ~.ng signed by the parties. The term of'Ghis Agreement may only be extended by a writing signed by the parties. 11. This Agreement may bs executed a.n as many counterparts as is necessary, alI of which when taketn together oai~.l constitute a siAg~.e ay~~.ement. 12. To the extent required by law, the undersigned Vail representative attests th$t he ar she has obtained the necessary aatd b~.~tding approval of this Agreement and its effects from the proper Vail authorities prior to execaticn of this Agreement. If such approval has not been Obtained., this Agreement shall have no farce and effect and each 8arty hereto snail have all rights and remedies avaf~lable to it Mast as if this Agreement had never )seen entered into. 13. Vail agrees upon request to provide Barber with adequate proof or documentation of the above-referenced Vail approval. MICHAEL BARBER THE TOWN OF V1~LIL ARCHITECTURE, A Professional Corporation By: By: . ~~~'~Y3ti~/ ~ ~ BOZ HOLT & ASS4CIAT'F.S, Attorneys. WELLS, LOVE 8C SCOBY, Attorneys A Professionax Corporation Attorneys for Town of Vail Attorneys for Michael Barbex Architecture, A ProfPS~:~ional Corporation By: By: L. Tyrone Holt t7avid C. We11s 3 TOTAL P. 04 G~: • RECEIVE~J APB ' ~ 1992 VAIL GOLF CLUB JOHN A. DOBSON ARENA 303-479-2260 321 Fast Lionshead Circle - FORD TENNIS COMPLEX ~il• Colorado 81657 303-479-2294 3U3-779-2271 ail ecre lO MARKETINGlSPECIAL EVENTS VAIL YOUTH SERVICES DISTRICT SPORTS 395 Fast Lionshead Circle 303-479-2279 Vail. Colorado 81657 NATURE CENTER 303-779-2292 292 Nest Meadow Drive • Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2291 303-479-2279 • FAX 303-479-2197 .~~:R J April 2, 1992 ,SSE LerT~R Ron Phillips, Town Manager Ric HARD /'t/Fc~s Town of Vail ~T~~ cN-~~ ' 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Ron: The Vail Recreation District is pleased to release the results of our resident and non-resident survey. Attached please find a complete copy of the survey and results. Approximately 3,900 surveys were randomly distributed to homes and post office boxes in Vail, Minturn, Eagle-Vail, Avon and Edwards. Rate of return was 24$. We are pleased with the results as it allows us to begin finalizing our long range master plan. Our staff will now incorporate the results into our master plan which has a target completion date of June 1, 1992. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or comments. Sint e~~e1y, I(, Rob Robinson Executive Director Attachment RR/la ! 1 -^r•~ ,'.~t +i~ ~ `J .r~J \j`~`,.:~ !~/'1~: ~ , i~ , I! ~ ^ JC 1,l ~ i v1 ^,J~ 1~ .i -J1 f 'RICHARD M. PHELPS, LTD. 4 GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT - P.t). tiUX 3295 EVERGREEN, COLORADO E0439 303-X70-Od~A F April 1, 1992 . Mr, Rob Robinson Executive Director Vail Rrcreadon District ~ 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, Colorado 81657 Deaz Rob: Thank you for your Lester of March 24, 1992, informing us that we were selected to be one of three finalists for the proposed 9-hole par-3 golf course in Yail. We are always honored to be in serious consideration. However, now that we have received the aerial photos and copies of the preliminary . sketch done by Mr. Bailey, we must beg your forgiveness and ask chat our name be withdrawn from consideration, Had we been aware of the site limitations earlier we would have spared ourselves and you kind peoples this embarrassment. ' . In our opinion, the site is not large enough to design, conswct and operate a safe gulf facility. In today's litigious society, we are very concerned that serious . ~ accidents and disruptions will occur that will result in lawsuits against the District, the golf course architect and golfers, A number of our concerns are enumerated below. 1. Existing homes -the existing hamcs on the north sidc of the site have ~ . . enjoyed the luxury of a peaceful, quiet, safe environment. Constructing the course will undoubtedly result in golf balls entering these properties; nrnses of maintenance equipmenr early in the morning will be noticeable and "strangers" going by their back yards will be an annoyance. This is always the case when a golf course is built ~IeZ housing has been established. 1'he Courts have frowned on any potential of introducing these interferences and dangers next to existing homes. 2. Interstate 70 is a high-speed highway (6S m.p.h.) adjacent to the proposed course. Not only is it very close to the golf site it is below the site making it that much more susceptible to errant golf balls, A shattered windshield at 65 m.p.h. could be devast;~ting. Should you go ahead with this course we ~ would suggest a clockwise routing of the holes to keel the slice/shank on the site rather than allowing it to fly onto the interstate or Into the homes, 3. The corridoi width is 150' through the center of the site which is considerably less that that recommended by the American Society of Golf Course Architects and the 1\'ational Golf Foundation. A corridor far a regulation hale is a minimum of 300', so even considering the par-3, it should not be less than 200 feet, A sidc-by-side golf hole scenario has a minimum of S00' with consideration for the par-3 holes, this might drop to I .i i.- yjfi Y I a., . ~i - - 1Nr. Rob Robinson Apri11,1992 s. Executive Dirt'.ctot page 2 ;T;~ Vail Recreadon District S 40Q feet. Once again, the Courts arc well•versed in these dimensions and, should injury or damage occur, an "expert witness" familiar with these standards will testify as such. 4. Walks such as those between 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 7 to g are all dangerous considering those people hiaing balls directly at the "waIker." S. Several centerlines of fairways are within 30 to~44 feet of the Property line. Even assuming perfect shots from the type of clientele who will be playing this course, this is entirely to close. G. Sketching in roali.stic green shapes and sizes further creates extreme dangers. Considering a 5,000 to 6,000 square foot ggreen, the right sides of those greens on most holes, but particularly 3 and d, would be within 10 to 15 feet . of the property Line. There is no room to move those greens left as they would fall dangerously in front of holes playing the opposite direction. The same - sizod green on hole #S would not leave room for tee #6. Grccns at #2 and #7 would likely be combined into a double green which, again, is extremely dangerous on a count such as this. 7. The topography or slope of land from side to side further complicates . - _ . _ ^ construction and will result in some difficult fill slopes on the downhi:t sides of greens and secs which will cause more extreme bounces toward I•?0. These can be mitigated by excavaring on the uphill side but they cannot be totally eliminated. R. The area shnwn for parking; entry and starter shack is extremely limited. Grading would be crucial for this to work -required setbacks from the entry . road could likely limit available space and neighbor objections as to the starter building aesthetics and placement could be obstacles as well. . Rah, we just feel thtrc is not enough room to fit what you would like into this site. We detest turning down possible work, but in clear conscience, we cannot recommend that you do this project. Thank you most sincerely for inviting us to be interviewed. We hope your #4 candidate may be willing to take our place. We wish you good luck on your project, but we also hope that you will strongly consider the comments above. We reali2e ~~`~that we are commenting on a preliminary sketch plan, but after 30 years !n the business, we do not see a reasonable solution that would vary that much. Please a~,,;don't hesitate to give me a call if you have any questions. - Sin Richard M. Phelps, ASGCA R MP/tmp ` RE~E!VEa ASR ~ 0 199? VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT 1991 RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT SURVEY RESULTS VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT " 1991 RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT SURVEY RESULTS I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY A. Premise B. Limitations C. B~~~ic Assumptions D. Ae~ministrative Procedure E. Survey Distribution II. ANALYSIS OF DATA A. Demographics B. Delimitations C. Resident Survey Analysis D. Non-Resident Survey Analysis E. Teen Survey III. CONCLUSIONS A. Resident B. Non-Resident _ C. Recommended Action IV. APPENDIX A. Resident Survey B. Non-Resident Survey C. Complete Survey Results D . C©~,t of the Survey 1991 Survey Page Two For the non-resident survey, questionnaires were mailed to a random 25$ of total box holders in the post offices of Minturn, Avon, and Edwards. Accompanying all of the non-resident questionnaires were the self-addressed, stamped return envelopes. The distribution schedule was apsT~follows: T~~ N. 8V~®EH DISTRIBII'~IOIT- } Sent ~ Returned ~ RESIDENTS 1900 458 24$ (1200-TOV, 700-VRD) NON-RESIDENTS 2000 451 23$ Distribution: P.O. Boxes Minturn - 162 Boxes Avon - 700 Boxes Edwards 250 Boxes Eagle-Vail 888 Door-to-Door RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT TEENS 30 30 100 TOTAL SURVEYS 3930 939 24$ With the telephone interview, phone numbers were sequentially selected based on a desired number of responses. The questions directly paralleled the mailed- out survey so that all data could be entered into the same program. In the final methodology, 30 questionnaires were handed out to high school aged youth. Upon completion, the questionnaires were immediately collected, yielding a 100$ response rate. II. AIdALHSIB OF DATl~. A. DE~iOGRAPHICB - ' The following are the demographic criteria used in the study: - sex - residency - marital status - age - income - town of residency (only for the non-resident survey) I. arrTaoDOCTIO~t ~ ~T~oDOr,oo~t A. PRBI~I®E - In order to solicit input from the public for inclusion in the Vail Recreation District ° s Three ( 3 ) Year Plan the district conducted a survey of .residents and non- residents. The survey took place during the summer of 1991 with completion in September. B. LIptITATIOMB - This study was limited to those Vail residents, chosen _ through random selection, who actually returned completed questionnaires. Also included in the study were non- residents residing in Minturn, Eagle-Vail, Avon and Edwards. Of these non-residents, a percentage of all post office box holders were delivered a Rion-Resident survey. Surveys were delivered door-to-door to random Eagle-Vail residents. Again, the study was limited to the portion of those completed, returned questionnaires. C. BASIC ASS~JMPTIOId8 - - The questionnaire was to be completed by any member of the household, not necessarily the head of the household. - The respondent was asked to answer for himself or herself only, therefore it is assumed that the responses reflect only those of the respondent. - It is assumed that the respondents completed the questionnaire on their own free will and to the best of their~knowledge. - It is assumed that the respondents were personally knowledgeable of the recreational capacities within the Vail Recreation District. D. ADMIYdIBTRATI9E PROCEDQREB - The study was administered using four methodologies: mail, telephone interview, hand-delivery of envelopes and personal delivery and collection. Of the f first methodology, two approaches were used: the first batch of 1200 surveys were randomly selected and included in the Town of Vail survey mailing according to physical mailing addresses. The second batch of 700 pieces was mailed alone several weeks later; the recipients were also randomly selected and self-addressed, stamped return envelopes were included. 1991 Survey Page Four 9. Outdoor Ice Rink 24.0 10. Organized Leagues 18.3 ~11. Youth Programs 10.3 12.. Red Sandstone 7.9~ 13. Sports Camps 7.9~ 14. Teen Programs 6.9~ Special events was the most utilized program/ service/facility offered by the district. 77~ of the residents surveyed participated in one of the Vail Recreation District events at least on a monthly basis. Outdoor programs were the second most utilized service with 50~ attendance at the Nordic Center and 39.1$ participation in Outdoor and Nature Center Activities. The lowest utilized programs were the Teen Programs, Red Sandstone Gym and Youth Programs. Some of these low numbers can be attributed to the smaller attendance capacities. 2. District Fundino Priority Respondents were asked to indicate the level of priority that should be given by the district in spending the limited funds it has available for facilities, programs and/or projects. DISTRICT FIINDING PRIORITY - FAIRLY RIGR TO EERY RIGR: RESIDENT 1. More Teen Programs 71.5 2. Nature Center Environ. Programs. 71.3 3. Community Special Events 71.0 4. More Youth Sports Programs 64.3 5. Sports Program Camps ~ 63.3 6. Dobson Arena 58.7 7. More 6-12 year old programs 56.3 8. More Outdoor Programs 54.3$ 9. Improve Athletic Fields 46.0 10. Vail Golf Course 43.5 il. More Programs for 1-5 year olds 40.1 12. Funding of Tennis 33.1 13. PAR 3 Golf Course 31.3 14. Develop Skateboard Park 22.9 Teen Programs was the highest priority for funding from the residents surveyed. 71.5$ of the residents felt that teen programs was either very high or fairly high for funding priority. Nature Center Environmental Programs were placed as the second highest funding priority at 1991 Survey Page Three B. DBLIIIYTATIOI~B - The following are observations made that may.have or may not have skewed the survey. - The participants may have responded because they had positive or negative feelings regarding the survey or survey content. - In the prioritization of funding section, the words "funding of tennis" may have had certain connotations to the respondent, thereby affecting his/her response. - The respondent was asked if he or she would support a recreation center, but the question did not imply whether the support was philosophical or financial; therefore it is not known if the percentages of approval and disapproval would remain the same if the type of support were specified. - Regarding the same question, the location of the proposed recreation center was not specified beyond "somewhere in the Vail Valley". Had it been specified, the approval/disapproval percentages may have been different. - Because four methodologies were used in data collection, we have a higher degree of confidence in the results than what is statistically proven through the descriptive statistics utilized. C. RESIDENT BIIRVEY ANALYSIS - 1. Facility/Procram Osage survey Results Respondents were asked to indicate which facilities and/or programs they (not other members of the family) used in the past twelve months. FACILITY PROGRAM IISAGE - AT LEAST ONCE A MONTB RESIDENT 1. Special Events '7'7.p$ 2. Dobson Arena 52.0$ 3. Nordic Center 50.0$ 4. Nature Center 39.1$ 5. Golf Course 35.9$ 6. Playing Fields 34.5$ 7. Tennis Courts ~ 30.6$ 8. Sports Programs 30.4$ 1991 Survey - Page Six 4. ~yguorct R®cr®at~lon Cent®~ Residents were asked if they would support a small recreation center being constructed somewhere in the Vail Valley. The center would include a gymnasium, small lap pool, child care center, weight room and racquet ball courts. More residents would support the Recreation Center than oppose it. 46.6$ of the~Residents surveyed would support the Center, while only 35.3$ would not support it. 18.2$ of the respondents were uncertain. Typically, this response number would be lower when you begin discussing issues such as funding and location of the facility. D. AiON-RE8IDEAIT 8IIR®EY AIdALY8I8 1. Facility/Program Dsac® Results Non-residents were asked which Vail Recreation District facilities and/or programs they (not other members of the family) used in the past 12 months. FACILITY PROGRAM DBAGE - MOPITHLY BASIS NON-RESIDENT 1. Special Events 65.4$ 2. Dobson Arena 41.4$ 3. Nature Center/Outdoor 34.2$ 4. Nordic Center 29.2$ 5. Golf Course 28.6$ 6. Playing Fields 24.4$ 7. Tennis Courts 22.5$ 8. Organized Leagues 18.7$ 9. Outdoor Ice Rink 15.5$ 10. Youth Programs 9.1$ 11. Red Sandstone Gym 6.4$ 12. Sports Camps 5.2$ 13. Teen Programs 4.9$ As with the resident survey, the non-residents surveyed responded that Special Events was the most utilized program the district offers. 65.4$ of the non-residents attended a special event at least once a month. The next most utilized facility (Dobson Arena) scored significantly less than special events. 41.4$ of non- residents use Dobson Arena at least once a month. The Nature Center and Outdoor Programs were the third most utilized facility/program with 34.2$ response. 1991 Survey Page Five 71.3$ as it rates fairly high to very high in comparison to other facilities/ programs and/or projects. The PAR 3 Golf Course received a low funding priority with only 31.3$ response. Funding of tennis was another low priority with 33.1$ of residents surveyed agreeing on funding. However, the wording of the tennis question may have skewed the results. 3. Feelincs about the Distriat Residents were asked to indicate how they feel about the Vail Recreation District REBIDENT'B FEELINGS ABOIIT THE DISTRICT - BTRONGLY AGREE- AGREE RESIDENT 1. Offer Resident Discount 87.7$ 2. Meets Leisure Needs 69.3$ 3. Operates Well as District 68.0$ 4. Good Job Advertising 63.3$ 5. Convenient Public Skating 63.2$ 6. Consolidate with EVMD 50.5$ 7. Offers Good Youth Programs 47.3$ 8. Expand Sports Programs 40.8$ 9. More Programs Down Valley 32.4$ 87.7$ of the residents surveyed strongly agree that the Vail Recreation District should offer resident discounts. The next highest rating was 69.3$ of residents felt that the Recreation District meets their leisure needs, and 68$ believe that the Vail Recreation District operates well as a district. Only 40.8$ of the residents surveyed want the sports programs to expand. Consolidating with Eagle/Nail Metro District and offering more programs down valley were not popular projects for residents receiving only 50.5$ and 32.4$ respectively. l! 1991 Survey Page Eight 3. Eton-reesi®ents lselincs_,About tie ~stx~ Non-residents were asked to indicate how they felt about the Vail Recreation District. . 1 ~o -RESIDEIJT ~ ~ was ~ocrr xHE p~sTRacx - ®TROIdaLY la~3REB-AGREE LION-RESIDE 1. Consolidate With EV~ID 66.1$ ~2. Good Job Advertising 63.0$ 3. Operates Well As A District 60.5$ 4. Convenient Public Skating 57.1$ 5. Offers Good Youth Programs 43.6$ 6. Important Role In Recreation 40.5$ 7. Expand Sports Programs 38.6$ A large majority of non-residents surveyed (66.1$) feel that the Vail Recreation District should consolidate with EVMD. Another 63$ of the non-residents surveyed strongly agree that the District does a good job advertising while 60.5$ of the non-residents strongly agree that the Vail Recreation District operates well as a district. 38.6$ of the non-residents surveyed agree that the District should expand sports programs. When asked if the Vail Recreation District plays an important role in their recreation, only 40.5$ of the non-residents surveyed agree. 4. Su~~ort Recreati®n Center Non-residents were asked if they would support a small recreation center being constructed somewhere in the Vail Valley. The Center would include a gymnasium, small lap pool, child care, weight room and racquet ball courts. A high percentage of non-residents would support a recreation center. A recreation center would be very well supported by the respondents in the non-resident survey. 61.1$ of the non-residents surveyed indicated that they would support a recreation center. 34.7$ of the non-residents surveyed would not support a recreation center. A low percentage (4.1$) of respondents were undecided on whether or not they would support a recreation center. 1991 Survey Page Seven Teen Programs and Sports Camps received low percentages 4.9$ and 5.2$ respectively for non-resident usage. These low numbers could 1'e due to the survey format. Respondents were tusked to respond for themselves only, not for the entire family: The majority of the respondents were not eligible to participate in these programs.' 2. p~,striot ~undine Priory Non-residents were asked to indicate the level of priority which should be given by the District in spending the limited funds it~has available for the following facilities, programs and/or projects. DI8TRICT ~IINDINf3 PRYORITY - VERY HIGH TO FAIRLY HIt~H NON-RESIDENT 1. Community Special Events 71.7$ 2. More Teen Programs 69.7$ 3. Nature Center/Env. Programs 65.5$ 4. More Youth Sports Programs 64.7$ 5. More Programs 1-12 Years 64.6$ 6. Sports Programs, Camps 56.8$ 7. Dobson Arena 46.4$ 8. Improve Athletic Fields 45.7$ 9. More Outdoor Programs 45.3$ 10. PAR 3 Golf Course 40.1$ il. Vail Golf Course 34.4$ 12. Funding of Tennis 25.0$ Community Special Events was the highest funding priority with 71.7$ of the non-residents responding for the District events. Teen Programs, Youth Sports Programs and programs for children ages 1-12 years were a high funding priority for non-residents receiving an average of 66.3$ rating for all three groups. The PAR 3 Golf Course and the Vail Golf Course were among the lowest .funding priorities .for non-residents. The funding of Tennis was the lowest funding priority for non-residents as it was for residents. Again, the wording of the tennis question may have skewed the results. 1991 Survey Page Ten 6. More Outdoor Programs 52.0$ 7. Sports Programs/Camps 52.0$ 8. More programs, 6-12 year olds 41.7$ 9. Funding of Tennis 25.0$ 10. Adature Center Environmental Prog. 24.0$ 11. Dobson Arena 21.7$ 12. More Programs, 1-5 year olds 20.0$ 13. Vail Golf Course 20..0$ 14. PAR 3 golf Course 12.0$ Again, teen programs were given highest funding priority at 88.0$, followed by Community Special Events (58.4$), and more Youth Sports Programs (56.5$). Teens did not. feel funding was a priority for programs for 1-5 year olds (20$) or the Vail Golf Course (20$). Teens gave lowest funding priority of the PAR 3 Golf course (12$). 3. Feelings about th® District Teens were asked to indicate how they feel about the Vail Recreation District. TEE~1' S I~EELYIYGS ABOOT THE DYSTRICT - STRONGLY AGREE - AGREE RESIDENTS AND NON-RESIDENTS 1. Offer Resident Discounts 84.0$ 2. Offer more programs down-valley 72.0$ 3. Offers Good Youth Programs 68.0$ 4. Meets Leisure needs 68.0$ 5. Operates well as a District 64.0$ 6. Convenient Public Skating 61.5$ 7. Good Job Advertising 57.7$ 8. Consolidate with M.D. 52.0$ 9.. Expand Sports Programs 48..0$ 84$ of the Teen's agree that the District should offer resident discounts. Offering programs down-valley is next in priority (72$) according to the teens surveyed. Teens feel the District offers good Youth Programs (68$) and meets their leisure needs (68$). 4. 8ux~t~ort Recreat~.oa Center 72.4$ of the teens surveyed were in favor of a small recreation center located somewhere in the Vail Valley. Interestingly,.there were no teens opposed to the idea, however, 27.6$ were undecided as to their support of a recreation center. 1991 Survey Page Nine E. TBSN BURVBY - 1. ~ao~}ity/ProQraa uaac• 8urvav ~teault Teens were asked to indicate which facilities and/or programs they (not other members of the family) used in the past twelve months. FACILITY PROGRAM[ OBAG~ - AT LEAST ONCE ]1 ~[O,?~.~ ~2ESZDENTS AND NON-RESIDENTS 1. Teen Programs 75.9$ 2. youth Programs 33.3$ 3. Special Events 21.4$ 4. Dobson Arena 10.3$ 5. Sports Programs 10.3$ 6. Playing Fields 10.3$ 7. Nature Center/Outdoor 6.9$ 8. Organized Leagues 6.8$ 9. Outdoor Ice Rink 6.8$ 10. Sports Camps 3.4$ 11.' Nordic Center 3.4$ 12. Vail Golf Club -0- 13. Tennis Courts -0- 14. Red Sandstone Open Gym -0- Not surprising, Teen Programs were the most utilized program by this group at 75.9$. Following teen programs were Youth Programs at 33.3$ and Special Events at 21.4$. Lowest usage by resident and non-resident teens were the Vail Golf Club, Tennis Courts and Red Sandstone Gym programs. 2. Dfstriot Funding PrioritX Teens were asked in indicate the level of priority that should be given by the District in spending the limited funds it has. available for facilities, programs and/or projects. DISTRICT FUNDING PRIORITY - FAIRLY HIGH TO VERY HIGH RESIDENTS AND NON-RESIDENTS 1. More Teen Programs 8g,p$ 2. Community Special Events 58.4$ 3. More Youth Sports Programs 56.5$ 4. Develop Skateboard Park 56.0$ 5. Improve Athletic Fields 52.0$ 1991 Survey .Page Twelve B. ~10E-R$BIDENT - 1. ~?aci1li~y/Proaran IIsaa~ As with the resident survey, there seems to be a correlation between more year-round facilities/ program versus seasonal programs. Special events emerge as the most-used program. This may be due to the amount and popularity of events in the Vail Valley. 2. District Fundiacx Priority, The non-residents are in agreement with the resident respondents in priority of funding for new and existing programs. Special events, teen, environmental and youth programs are the areas most of the non-residents feel need the most attention. There may be a correlation, as with the resident survey, as to whom is completing the survey (parents vs. a single resident). 3. Feelinc9 about the District The most pressing issue for non-residents is the consolidation with the EVMD. There may be a correlation between the resident discounts and the feelings about consolidation. A~ost of the non-residents perceive the District as operating well as they respond that they know who we are and what we do. 4. SUDD®rt of.a Recreation Center There was stronger support of a Recreation Center from the non-residents (61.1$) than from the resident respondents. D. RECOMMENDED ACTIOBT Based on the survey results, the following actions are recommended: 1. Community Soecial Events Both residents and non-residents feel special events are important to their community. Concurrently, all groups felt funding should be a priority when it comes to creating more events. The District is addressing the importance of special events by dedicating funding, .full- time staff and equipment toward the production of current 1991 Survey Page Eleven IIY. CONCLDSIO~TB 7?. R88IDEN'1' - 1. ~aailitg/Proq~as osaa~ Special ~ events, Dobson Arena and the Nature Center/Outdoor Programs emerged as the most used facilities and for programs by the respondents. Out of 124 facilities and/or programs listed, these three choices were at 50$ or higher. These results may be due to the year-round nature of both special events and Dobson Arena. The Nordic Center was 11$ higher than the next most-used facility which is the Nature Center. The rest of the facilities/programs are grouped in the 30- 39$ usage category. This may be due to the seasonality of the programs. 2. District Fun6inc Priority Most of the respondents feel the District should concentrate on more Teen programs, Environmental and Outdoor programs and Community Special Events. 3. Feelincs about tb• District An overwhelming majority of the residents (87.7$), agree with the District's philosophy of offering discounts to residents. A majority of resident respondents also agree that overall, the District meets their current leisure needs. Resident respondents have an awareness of program and facility offerings through the District's advertising efforts. 4. Consolidation With ~D/sucnort of Recr®ation C®nter There were mixed reviews from the resident respondents when considering consolidation with the EVMD and support of a recreation center. 50.5$ of the resident respondents would support consolidation with EVMD. However, these results are purely philosophical in nature since pertinent issues such as the debt service of the EVMD were not discussed. Also, results were mixed from resident respondents (46.6$) in support of a Recreation Center. Issues such as funding, location and bond issues were not addressed, therefore this number may drop once these points are determined. These number of responses alone are not a reason for the District to act upon at this time. 1991 Survey Page Fourteen 6. iarkst~.gf~?dvartisinq $!f®rts Both resident and non-resident respondents seem to be pleased with the District's current marketing and advertising efforts. The District should continue with a consolidated Marketing Branch fn the promotion of current and future programs and facilities. Continued research of the moat effective advertising modes must be done as the District expands and creates new programs. Education of residents and non-residents alike is paramount as the District grows. It will become especially important as the District nears 1993, as discussion begins to focus on consolidation with the Town of Vail. 7. Ov®rail f®elinQS about th® District Resident respondents agree the District is currently meeting their leisure needs. The District should continue to offer discounts to residents. In addition, the District should continue to monitor residents changing leisure needs. 8. Consolidation o?ith the D Resident respondents have voiced mixed reviews in addressing consolidation with the EVMD. However, non- residents feel they would benefit from consolidation. The District must continue to evaluate the benefits consolidation will bring its residents. The District should continue to monitor the possibilities of continued cooperative programming down-valley. This will be especially important as the Berry Creek land-use issue continues to evolve. 9. suoDOrt of a Recreation Cent®r Resident respondents do not support a Recreation Center as much as non-residents. As discussion continues on the Berry Creek 5th Filing, the District should continue to evaluate the benefits Vail residents will receive by District management of a recreation facility. 1991 Survey Page Thirteen events. The District should continue to encourage the creation of new events, especially during "shoulder seasons" when the event can assist in bringing activity and business into the Town of Vail. 2. Natu~• Center/Environmental P;oorams/Outdoor Re°reatio~ Outdoor Recreation; including the Nature Center and environmental programs, were among the top three priorities in regards to funding and usage by both residents and non-residents. 1992 will showcase the dedication the District has made to this area. With a full-time staff person committed to Outdoor Recreation, environmental education programs will make a definite impact on addressing these needs. As this area continues to grow in the 1990's, the District should plan on expansion in this area throughout the year. 3. Youth Sorts PrOQrama Resident and non-resident respondents have indicated there is a need for expanded Youth Sports programs. With the District plans to expand its youth programs to include little league, T-Ball, and numerous youth sports camps, these needs will be addressed in 1992. The District should evaluate the need for continued expansion in this area in future years. 4. Teen Procrams Based on the results of the resident, non-resident and teen surveys, all are in agreement that existing Teen programs should be expanded. The District should explore the avenues in which teen programs can be expanded and initiate action on the findings. 5. Golf Course/PAR 3 Golf Course Although the Vail Golf Course is used at least once a month by roughly one-third of both the residents and non- residents, the PAR 3 Golf Course was not felt to be among the top funding priorities by the respondents. Other than tennis and development of a skateboard park, the PAR 3 Golf Course project was the lowest funding priority by the respondents. This may be due to lack of education of the respondents about the PAR 3 Golf Course funding source and the targeted campletion~date. The District should focus on education of its residents on the plans for the Par 3 Golf Course and its subsequent development. 'Resident Vail Recrea i®n , ®IST131C°I' m ~v.e aka.. aa. • roe, c.~...s. elan • ses.ar-era VAIL RECREATI®N ®ISTRICT SURVEY ~ . Please Rp N the nc>R 9tw dertagr>ophk r=uesUons. ~?Irs IMorenoUon wU4 be usod Ior ptsnn{r~ PurposoL fl Ilan u~ lny of INou @uestbns you would prefer not to asnswor, ®laae ket hoe to tesnre dam plar?k For eaeA rluesUon, please t~+ec:9c tfa atnswsr wttidl pest descrtpes your status. A. An you e: O male O femalit d. An you r. ? fun-time resident ~ ? second home owner Q rentor ? guestNis+tor O other G An you: ? Single wtlh ro children ? married with ro children ? stngb mth Children ? married with children D. My ape ls: ? under 20 years D 20 to 34 years ? 35 to 49 years ? 50 to t>4 years O 65 and over f. tlYhlch of tM lollowin~ Income cstegorlea moat closely ®eecrlt>ea your Ismlly's tool annual Income before tettea, tndudinq wapea and all other lncome. O under 20.000 O ?0,000-.30,000 O 31,000-do,000 ? 41.000-50.000 O over 50.000 Flrst wo would Ilko to know which of the following taciltties snd~or programs you (not other membor>I of your family) have used In tho past t2 months. 1,E43 THAN A80tlT ONCE ABOUT ONCE AEAIOST NOT AT Ali ONCE A YptTN A YOr~(T)i A tqf fl( GAILY A. vas Con ChAlCo~sse O ? O O O e. Tennis Ccut: O O O D D c. t~o:on tce Arena O O O O O D. Natve Canter! CMdoor program O O O O O E. Soorta tacasy programs O O O O O agar,;zea t.eaguos O O O O D open ~ 10rie O O O O O so«u Camps O O O O D Playing Fw+da O ? O D O F. Pdordre Confer Xcanvy stu vats ? ? O O O G. Ourdoor ice rink at vw gal cause O O D ? O K Youtt, programs O O ? ? ? Teen programs O O O O O t. special Everts a u+duee Symphony of Spats. ,lorry f-pE Invitational, Kayak Event. Scots Marru~ton ? ? ? ? ? Cout® you ploa'e tell m9 the level of ®rlority avttlch sftoutE oe glreR ~y the dlstrkt In spending tM tlmtte6lun®a BB Ase availaWo lot the toltowb?~ tedlltlea, ®P0®PARIe and,'o~t ®roJecle. VERY 1i01V fA1RlY l0'e1 OAlRLY Ie1GM VERB t~N . OWGNtTV PRtoRRY ®RtoR(TM ?RIoR(TY Q tJbre ~ogran+s for yart+par ctrldr ~ ads t $ peart? O O O (i!. h0wdo nwr• progranre ea ~t2 years O O O O C. tutors tser+ progranm+~, .,es O O O O O. tubre yo,,,n Sports progrsrr~ O ® - t' - • E ttn~roYe 6afl tistoa, - itak9 arro ~ ® ® ~ O O R. Otter nm+e outdflor paograrne ttapa?eng, mouretau+etunDeng, ctc.t O O O O G. tJeveaep a stateboar9 park O O O O x Fundrog or teru~is O O O O Vail Natue t:eruw ark error,,, ~..w ed~aatan programs O - D O O . J. Corrnwnty soec~ events O O O O tt. Jot,n A. t)ooaon tcs Arses O O O O L vas Gott Ctub/Couse O O O O tit. oar 3 Gat Ca~rss O D O O M. Soons p+oc~ams; cans Tournament and races D O O O in tAe lollowing questions please let us know how you feel abaut the Vatl Recreation Olstrict 1?~ Vail Reueatlon DlsWct: sTaoaG~v sTpo+~a(.v AGREE AGREE UNDEt~DED DrSAGREE OtSAGRFE A. Does a goof job adwresing tt+a sati{iDp:, txo(yarns end t+mmicea a oners O O O D O Oobson Arena's P~:c stating is convervent O O O O O G Otters a good pro6b of yoke, programs O O O ? O S1raAd otter more progrsms down vaiey (Eagtavrt) O O O O O E Stra,td over residend dscounu O D O O O F. tweeds to egtsand its spoftt program - O O O O ~ O Q. Sttavtd e~tore tt,e ~s5ibifities of cor?saidatlng r~;m Eag+e/vat t)istritt O O O O O K Goes a good job operating as a recreation mstrict O O D D O t. In general. tt,e 6strict nets rtry teiwro needs O O O O O 1 would support a small recreation center being constructed somewPtere In the Yafl Valley. The center woutd Inctudo s gymnastum~ small tap pool childcare center, weight room~and racquet ball courts. O Yes O No Thank you for your time and support. 11 you have questions concerning the 1/ail Recreation District, feet Tree to call us at 479-2279. teutd yov ptfaff toy of the brel el Pr1a11Y ttrhlch fhould'• `Ivef1 tsy the dl'trlct >n fpendtnp ttw ltmltee tw+df K Mf •ra+taWe tw 9hf 9eflowNg 9adlitlff, ptogramf and.•et ®ro(ectf. a¢wr taut rAt*tr `oar ®Ant`r eeoa rear Dees etuottr4r ®ntottmr ®tuasrtv ®Rrow~r ~ c~*toa«+~r~ to yovgfr ® O O O ng.t t{~atf b?~'yttutn~t2 wee O ® O o. ~®ra,f+ Boons o?o~+n+o O O ~ O ~ f* ae~i+a~ ® ® O O f. fluor rtmro outtpoa progratnf (ktyatenq, rngertatn ctirt+ortg, ek.l O O O O G. Otwoo a soatoeard paAt O O O O ~ Fto+6r+g d t~ O O O O, t, vas Nanro Cont« trna onv.ame<+taio6ucet~ar+aoq~arm O ~ O O ~ O Corrmuroq st»c+a? owns O O O O K ,ror+n A. t)obson 1CO t?re*u O O O O t_ vai Go>t CtuD/Car+o O O O O ?e. Pr s con Caxta O O O O N. Spons txogf tuns: can+os ?aunur+ent tnd scot O O O O in tino to0owiny quesllons pteas• 1st us know how you feel about the Yait Recreation Olslrkt. ~ Val! Reueatsoe D{strkt: staowatr ~ stacrrc~r AGat:$ AGREQ uN0ECs0ED (kSAGREE thSACatii A. Moos a good jofl adr«6senq Yr Moos. progams ttn6 sarvrcet o onws O O O O O s. s~ g a can~ren+nt O O O O O C. ONors a good txoR4 of O O O O ~ca,n aograrr+s O 0. St,aAd oRe< mao orogrorr~s O O O O O Gown relay lEsgaYst) E Sr+outdofla rtsident3 6scounts O O O O O F. tdooos b upend ns sports program O O O O O t3. Snoutd e>~ora Uw possb~7itiet Gadoo! dasng rntR EegieNai O O O O O K boos a good op«ating ae a tocroalion 6strC1 O O O O O 1. ~~n« 6strict meets mr O O O O O 1 would support a small recreatbn center being con9tnscted stxnewh®re {n 4he Vail Palley. Tho center would {nciudo a gymnasium, small lap pool, childcare tattler, weight room and racquet bah cour9a O Yes O iN0 Thank you fa your time and support. If you have questior?s concerning the Vail Recreation DisUict, leek free to ca?t us at 479-2279. Noti-resident Vail Recrea ion ®ISTRICT l~car Vail Vatlcy Rcsider?t, You hang been selected to obtain feedback concerning recreation in the Vail Vatlcy. Your responses will play an important part in helping the District e`~aluate existing recreation programs. Please fill in the next few questions. If there are any of these questions you would preffet not to answtr, please feet free to Itave them blank. For each question, please check the answer which best desceibes your status. A. Are you s: ? male ? female Are you a: ? full-time resident L second home owner Q center Q guestlvisitor [t other C. Are you: Q singlc with no children ? married with no children ? singlc with children married with children D. Your age is: D under 20.'ears ? 20 to 3.8 years 35 to 49 years ? SO to 64 years ? bS and over Which of the following income categories most closely describes your family's total annual income befoee taxes, including wages and all other income. Q under 520,000 S20,000-30,000 ? 531,0000,000 ~ 541,000-50,000 p over 50,000 . F. Do you live in: ? Avon ? Edwards i] Eagle-Vail j] Minturn First we would~like to know which of the tollowing facilities and/or programs you (RIOT other members of your family) have used in the past I? months. LESS 1HAld A!lOU1 ONCE ADOUT ONCE Alt~A0S4 a0i At All ONCE ~ MO~tTIt ~ NtONTN A Y~EEls DAll1 Vail Golf Club/Course O : ~ D C ? Tennis Courts p ~ D D p C. Dobson lee Arena 0 L~ D fl p Nature Center/ Outdoor Program D D - ? Q Sports Facility Programs Organized Leagues Q O O ? ? Red Sandstone Open Gym Q L~ ? ? G Sports Camps O O D ? p Playing Fields 0 O Q ? ? F. Nordic Center X-Country Ski Trails ? p ? p ? G. Outdoor ice Rink at the Golf Course O O G ? G H. Youth Programs 0 ? G ? ? I. Teen Programs ? D D D ? .1. Special Events including Symphony of Sports, Jerry Ford Invitational, Kayak Event, Scott Hamilton ? Q D D Q Cou1®you pieces tort de ~+e beret of prlallti wt+lch tP+ould be glroft by the dlatrkt Ofl T,per?ding tM tlmlbed tun®s h Aao ,ra~taWe for the lollowlr+g Iltdlltles, pr®gramt end~or proJeets. . mar t.~w P,ufr+~r t,a+a vetettr r ~Ar Pll10RtTr ®Rb04trPr ®tpOtRrTY PtB~t~Pg a t~AOra programs 9a per tar ~+e-t2 yeere O ® O O C, t~ t~ program~sr>+N+css ® O ta,ra rout? 8oata tams ® O O ~ O ~ ~ ® O O O tJt~r mao outdoes programs (kaparang, mora+tsn cirnbrng, etc.) O O O O c. t?erelop a skat~rd park O O O O a. Fundrr+g d terv+s O O O O t. vas rJatrro Center and arwa.~, ~,.w educas~, programs O O O O d. Commuroty specrat e~nts O O O O tC John A. OoCsan km Arp~a . ? ® O O L Vad Goff CtublCaoxa O O ? ? tt. Par 3 cat C~r>ro O O O O P1. Spans programs carr+ps Tournament and races O O O O In the loiloav(ng Questions pleas® let us know how you tact about lh• Vall Recreation Olstrkt.l??e Yall Reuatlon DlsWct: fttr~oracir atnonc`r gears eesEt: uaee„~„ otsACae~ ~sACara Il Doss a good pb ao+ertis+r+g . tR! tacitit,es. prograrnf and smrrocos rt oners O O O O O B. Oossa+ Arena's PuDbc sr<atu,g is conveni~ O O O O O C. df~rs a goo0 profile of ya,>n p,oq:rre O D O O O D. ShaAd offer rnOra wograma down ratey (Eagre-Vag O O O O O E Snoutd otter residents 6stounte O D O O O F. Pieeds to e><pand its spats program O O O O O G. Should more the possibili0e9 a consdidanng with EagteNaa OiettiGt O O O O O ~ r~eai~~~~asa O O O O O t. M general, tfie dsUicl rt~ets my 12iw?e needs O O O O O 1 would support a small recreation center being con9tructed somewhere In ih• Val Vapey. Ths center would Include a gymnasium, small lap pool, childcare c®nter, weight room and racquet ball courts, O Yes O , No Thank you for your time and support. IJ you have questions concerning the 4/ai! Recreation District, fee? tree to calf us at 479-2279. teut~A yvv pisses ten a®4l+e level a4 prtaity wf?ttf+ •houlA Oo ®Irvn Iky She 6lstrkt to tp•r?dinq tM 1lmriod lun®e h Ase ,v,~tapl' let ~e lottow4+~ lecllllles~ prvprems end'or pro~etle. mar wW ?alak~ k~ ?ara~r la~ll mar I~il Oa~Aatt'1 Pal~attV Pagatrl Paste A trbre dogarro ~ e? a~.n ages 1-~ yeerP O ® O D wee lan programstservgcee ® ® O O 0. 0+1ore Ya?tn sonm pro0r~ O ® O ~ O E tegroae Dal i1M6s, eoooer lira aro t~gv+q tistde ® ® ® O F. Oar more ov~®oor pragnrt+a laaya~mnp, rno~rxar?c>in+ov~. sec.) O ® ® O Q. OevMop a s~vCoard park O O ® O st i~ng d terrtia ® O ® O 1. Y~i taarv Centr and ~ educas~on poQrame O O O O J. t:am+unq soec+at evertia O O O O 11. ~ A. poison ke Arena O O O O Yee Gdt t~lCovse O O ® ? ka Fa ~ Gon Co~s+s O O O O ~l $COnS DrO~ams; Carrtiflb YournamerH y,Q races O O O O 4n file bllowing Qu®stiorts please let us know horn you feel about tho Vail Recroatlon Cislrkt. The Ysl! Retreatlon District: stRa+G~r stao~sot,v AGREE AGREE UfdCE...~r~. gSAGREQ t'rSAGREE Il poet a goo0 job s~erasMg ~1e (aCAiD04. prOg MiZ ind sa?rces r; Onas O O O O O ® sRaar,q s conven,sre O O O O O G deers a Qo~oC proNe or Youo+progame O O O O O O. S++ald over rr>ors programs sown vasq (Esg~va~l O O O O O E Stousd oner rKi ~scounu O O O O O i. rdeeds ~ •:pans its scats progta?n O O O O O 8. St+ourO •~ora vie ooss+~ioes Ow>r~ D O O O O K Does a jos operating ae a tecroation ~scct O O O O O k ~r~~ d~s?rictmeetsmtr D O O D ~ O i would support a small tecreatlon center bain9 constructed somewhere In 4he Yak Vailey. The cvn4er would Rnchrde • gymnasium, small lap pool, ehtldcare cenlvr, welghl room and racquet ball courts. O Yes O loo Thank you !or your time and support. It you have questions concerning the Vail Recreation District feet tree to call us at 4T9-2279. - VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT SURVEY RESULTS • RESIDENT BBJR®EY AESIIL?8 w~ fl~ACILITY/PROGRJ?M OSA~3E BOR®EY RESIILTB vv 'v<v h O OZ 4 ~ a~ ~ ~ C~ h O Q. O Q Q- Q~ 4 A) GOLF COURSE 74.1 16.4 8.5 6.5 4.5 1.71 B) TENNIS COURTS 79.4 14.5 b:0 7.4 2.7 1.60 C) DOBSON ARENA 58.1 37.8 •8.1 4.3 1.8 1.74 D) NATURE CENTER/OUT PROGRAMS) 60.9 28.1 7.4 2.5 1.1 1.55 E) SPORTS PROGRAMS: 69.5 16.5 5.8 ?.4 0.7 1.53 ORGANIZED LEAGUES 81.7 3.5 3.5 10..8 0.5 1.45 R.S. OPEN GYM 92.1 5.1 1.2 1.4 0.2 1.13 SPORTS CAMPS 92.1 5.6 1.6 0.5 0.2 1.11 PLAYING FIELDS 65.5 14.5 9.2 9.4 1.4 1.67 F) NORDIC CENTER 50.0 24.0 11.7 11.4 2.9 1.93 G) OUTDOOR ICE RINK 75.9 14.2 4.3 5.0 0.7 1.40 H) YOUTH PROGRAMS 89.7 1.6 3.4 3.1 2.2 1.27 TEEN PROGRAMS 96.1 1.8 1.4 0.5 0.2 1.0? I) SPECIAL EVENTS 22.9 37.5 28.5 10.3 0.7 2.28 - o• 'y' DISTRICT Fi12dDZNG BRIORITY BIIRVEY RE8IILT8 03 O~ ~ O~ 3 `Z~ ,ZtiO O~ U ~ v ~ ~ ~ A) MORE PROGRAMS, 1-5 YEARS 31.5 28.4 30.7 9.4 2.18 B) MORE PROGRAMS, 6-12 YEARS 18.9 24.8 45.0 11.3 2..49 C) MORE PROGRAMS, TEENS 12.3 16.3 47.4 24.1 2.83 D) MORE YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS 12.7 22.9 47.3 17.0 2.69 E) IMPROVE ATHLETIC FIELDS 18.4 35.6 33.6 12.4 2.40 F) MORE OUTDOOR PROGRAMS 15.6 30.2 42.2 12.1 2.51 G) DEVELOP SKATEBOARD PARK 48.8 28.3 16.8 6.1 1.80 H) FUNDING OF .TENNIS 33.3 33.6 26.2 6.9 2.07 I) NATURE CENTER ENV. PROGRAMS 9.2 19.5 51.3 20.0 2.82 J) COMMUNITY SPECIAL EVENTS 11.1 17.9 46.2 24.8 2.85 K) DOBSON ARENA 13.9 27.4 45.0 13.7 2.58 L) VAIL GOLF COURSE 29.0 27.5 29.5 14.0 2.29 M) PAR 3 GOLF COURSE 42.5 26.2 18.0 13.3 2.02 N) SPORTS PROGRAMS, CAMPS 15.6 21.2 46.0 17.3 2.65 Resident Survey Results Pege Two . 8011 RESPO~TDEIdTS PEEL ABOIIT ®ISTRIC'T ~ O~~P ~ ~O ~ i O ~ ~ Q~ Jam' O ~ ~ O~ A) GOOD JOB ADVERTISING 11.0 52.3 20.4 13.8 2.3 2.44 B) CONVEN. PUBLIC SKATING 10.4 52.8 22.5 11.3 3.0 .2.44 C) OFFERS GOOD YOUTH PROGRAMS 6.2 41.1 43.3 7.9 1.4 2.57 D) MORE PROGRAMS DOWN VALLEY 10.0 22.4 35.8 22.0 9.8 2.99 E) OFFER RESIDENT DISCOUNTS 52.9 34.8 7.0 3.9 1.4 1.66 F) EXPAND SPORTS PROGRAMS 8.2 32.6 43.9 13.7 1.7 2.68 G) CONSOLIDATE WITH EVMD 17.1 33.4 32.7 10.0 6.9 2.56 Ii) OPERATES WELL AS A DISTRICT 11.3 56.7 25.2 5.2 1.6 2.29 I) MEETS LEISURE NEEDS 12.1 57.2 21.4 6.7 2.6 2.30 SUPPORT RECREATIOAi CENTER YES - 46.6$ NO - 35.3$ UNSPECIFIED - 18.2$ TOTAL IdOMBER Off' SIIR9EY8 SELECTED BASED Old SELECTYON CRITERIA YATPIITo X851 V!?IL RECREATION DISTRICT SOR~EY REBULTS .y NOId-RBSIDENT BIIHt®BY RESIILTS FACILITY/PROGRAN ®BAGE SORVEY RESULTS ~O= ~k,~ ~ \ ~ ~ O 4 Q~ OJT J't ~O`'' ~O~ O~G Qg QUO Q,`v A) GOLF COURSE 71.4 19.6 5.7 2.6 0.7 1.42 B) TENNIS COURTS 77.4 ;11.6 3.7 5.7 1.5 1.42 C) DOBSON ARENA 58.6 32.8 '~3.5 4.2 0.9 1.56 D) NATURE CENTER/OUT PROGRAMS) 65.9 '23.9 8.8 1.5 0.0 1.46 E) ORGANIZED LEAGUES: 81.2 3.'S !~2.4 12.6 0.2 1.47 R.S. OPEN GYM 93.6 ~ 2.6 1.8 1.8 0.2 1..12 SPORTS CAMPS 94.7 3.3 ~ 1.5 0.4 0.0 1.08 PLAYING FIELDS 75.6 7.7 5.7 10.1 0.9 1.53 F) NORDIC CENTER 70.9 14.7 9.0 4.4 1.1 1.50 G) OUTDOOR ICE RINK 84.4 9.6 ~ 3.9 1.8 0.2 1.24 H) YOUTH PROGRAMS 91.0 4.0 ` 2.0 2.0 1.1 1.18 I) TEEN PROGRAMS 95.2 2.0 2.0 0.9 0.0 1.09 J) SPECIAL EVENTS ~ 34.6 38.8 .21.1 4.6 0.9 1.98 DISTRICT FIIA1DI3dG PRIORYTY 8UR®EY REBIILTB ~ ,y. O~ v Z` ~O~ ~ ~r i i .r C~ ~ 4~ 4~ i ~Q J~Q- ~Qti tcQti' QJ~C' A) MORE PROGRAMS, 1-12 YEARS 20.0 15.4 39.4 25.2 2.70 B) MORE PROGRAMS, TEENS 16.8 13.5 44.4 25.3 2.78 C) MORE YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS 17.2 18.1 45.1 19.6 2.67 D) IMPROVE ATHLETIC FIELDS 22.2 32.0 32.0 13.7 2.3? E) MORE OUTDOOR PROGRAMS 21.1 33.6 32.7 12.6 2.37 F) FUNDING OF TENNIS 43.1 31.9 18.3 6.7 1.89 G) NATURE CENTER ENV. PROGRAMS 10.8 23.7 42.3 23.2 2.78 H) COMMUNITY SPECIAL EVENTS 11.0 17.3 45.2 26.5 2.87 I) DOBSON ARENA 17.8 35.8 '36.8 9.6 2.38 J) VAIL GOLF COURSE 36.8 28.8 24.0 10.4 2.08 K) PAR 3 GOLF COURSE 34.6 25.3 24.1 16.0 2.21 L) SPORTS PROGRAMS, CAMPS 17.2 26.0 44.6 12.2 2.52 Non-Resident Survey Results a Psge Two IIOW ItEBPOflsTDEIdTB fl~EEL ABOUT DISTRICT ~ ti Q~' @~ O O~ p~ O~~ ~`ti hQ~~ ~~0~~ ~t`QQ~ Q- O c~'~ QO J~ O~ ~ Q A) GOOD JOB ADVERTISING 9.6 53.4 19.7 15.2 2.1 2.47 B) CONVEN PUBLIC SKATING 10.3 46.8 24.4 15.5 3.0 2.54 C) OFFERS GOOD YOUTH PROGRAMS 3.8 39.8 47.6 7.6 1.2 2.63 F) EXPAND SPORTS PROGRAMS 9.5 29.1 47.6 12.1 1.7 2.67 G) CONSOLIDATE WITH EVMD 30.2 35.9' 21.1 6.6 6.1 2.23 H) OPERATES WELL AS A DISTRICT 8.6 51.9 32.2 5.6 1.9 2.40 I) IMPORTANT ROLE IN RECREATION 7.2 33.3 22.1 27.2 110.2 3.00 BUPPORT RECREATIOfld CENTER YES - 61.1 NO - 34.7 UNSPECIFIED - 4.1~ TOTAL gtiTMBER OF' SURVEYS BELECTED BABED OF1 SELECTION CRITERIA II~PIITY 458 1 s 1991 Survey Page Fifteen p~ eos~ o~ Tea sv~~Y ~ - RESIDENT Printing 1000 sheets $250.00 1000 retwcn envelopes 84.00 1000 logo envelopes 84.00 Postage 700 bulk rate (15.5) 115.50 700 return envelopes (.29) X03.00, ~73i.30 NON-RESIDENT Printing 2000 sheets $217.00 2000 logo envelopes 167.00 2000 return envelopes 167.00 Postage 2000 bulk rate (12.4) 248.00 2000 return envelopes 580.00 X1379.00 APR - 1 0- 9 2 F R I 1 4 1 4 Inc l a n e S o r t s P- 8 1 ~ O~ F'AX TR~4S~AISSIOI~i ~ 4 DATE: Aprt1 10, 1992 TO: Martha Raecker Town of Vail FAX #3031479-2157 FROM: Charlie Graves Inclyne Sports . RE: Ride of Your Lif6 _______=~~~W=W==-------___________ It was great meeting another Cyclone during vur most recent visit to the Vail Valley. Unfortunately, upon our return, we discovered that CBS Sales Department had taken over programming decisions for the sports network. . Yesterday, they~decided to eliminate all outside packaged events scheduled to air on CBS during the second and third quarter. This induded the "Ride of Your Life" as we were purchasing the editorial and commercial inventory from CBS Sports to air this program. Vlrrthout a tetevisiorl contract, we were forced to cancel this year's event. We were enthusiastic about the new location, the support we received from V.A., the Town ' of Val! and Vail Valley as well as the many sponsors we brought into this program. It will take us a few weeks to recover from the shock, but 1 expect we will try to return next summer with a new program on a different network. i have attached a press release for your reference. and are available to answer any of your questions, Warm Regards. Cr{.~t~ . 44S WCSI Eric, SuitC 210 ~ Chicago, 11linois 60610 , (312) 943.3444 a Fax (312) 943-Up14 c~ - a te r .c ~ Y i n c . 7 n~ a P o r s m e o FC~R If~Il1AEDIATE 8~~{.F~?SE For arare Ir~forraaatiout contact: f~~ril 't992 Charlie Graves Inclyne Spor#s Phone: 312/943~~44 k,~ '1992 ~RI1DE OF YGI~R LIFE° CANCELLEE3 ' Due to the lack of a network television agreement, the 1992 °Rlde of Your LifB" mountain bike race was cancelled today. The 1991 event took place in Wail, Colorado, and marked the first time mountain biking had aired on a major television network (P?BC Sports). The 1992 event was scheduled to air on CBS Sports on July 12, 1992. However, after six months of assurances that the program I ~ _ would air,' CBS Sports ice President of Programming, Rick Gentile stated that, "{CBS) sales is reluctant to have anyone in the marketplace while they're trying to unload golf and baseball (commercial) inventory; particularly around ®lympic #ime. Your event (the "Ride of Your L(fe"} and several others was rejected on the ba$i5 of it cannibaiizing.third quarter (commercial} inventory which might otherwise find itself in CBS° other an-air properties". . Inclyne Sports, owner and promoter of the race, expects to rally sponsors snd advertisers to stage this event in 1993 for network television. 4a5 VVcst Eric, Suito 210 ° ~hicagv, Illinois 60610 ~ (312) 943-3444 • Fax {312) 943-0014 - We're taking television ~ into tomorrow. R~CEIV~p /~P,? ~ 3 ~99~ HERITAGE sM A TCI COMPANY ~Ur^ G/ti ~CKy ll / r March 12, 1992 The Honorable Margaret A. Osterfoss Mayor of Vail Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mayor Osterfoss: Now that 1991 is behind us, it seems appropriate to reflect back on the past year. I'd like to take this opportunity to provide you with a brief "cable television review" of our operations in the Town of Vail, highlighting our increased emphasis on customer service, our continued. .involvement in community service, our additional service options, as well as our plans for the future. CUSTOMER SERVICE: 1991, more than any previous year, saw an intense industry focus on customer service issues. Our parent company, Tele-Communications, Inc. '(TCI), introduced the second phase of its nationwide program called "The Customer 1st". The changes and improvements made, which affected our office in 1991, are as follows:' * An $00 Number: An 800 number has been installed to the division and the corporate offices. Customers not satisfied with problem resolution at a local and/or state level may be referred to these numbers. TCI Central - (800) 4.24-8242 TCI Corporate - (800) 800-2824 * Credit Privileges: TCI has started offering Master Card and Visa as an alternative form of payment. * Customer Satisfaction Survey: We conducted a survey to assess our performance and are pleased to inform you that 89$ of our customers reported satisfaction with their cable service. P O. Box 439 0140 Metcalf Road Avon, Colorado 81620 (303) 949-5530 FAX (303) 949-9138 An Equal Opportunity Employer COMMUNITY SERVICE: Our desire to actively support and contribute_to the community .in which we live and conduct our business found us participating in several worthwhile projects in 1991: * Centennial Project: We are addressing local environmental concerns by contributing to the U.S. Forest Service. * Muscular Dystrophy Association: We raised $3,755.00 for MDA in the Eagle Valley area through a cooperative effort with new subscribers. * Toys For Tots: Working with the Salvation Army organization, we collected and distributed 50 toys to needy area children. * Library Opening: Along with the Arts and Entertainment Channel, our contribution totaled $5,000.00 for the Avon Library Grand Opening. * Bravo Colorado: We again contributed $5,000.00 to the local Music Festival. * Education Scholarships: Local high schools received $3,000.00 to enhance our youth's future. Additionally, our employees are active members of The Rotary Club and Bravo Guild. We are also actively involved with the community's recycling effort. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: During 1991, we made several changes to improve and/or increase the service options available to our customers. * Fog: The new sattelite feed of The Fox Network. * Eglianded Basic: This is a new, .optional level of service which includes high quality programming, however, these programming services have had large cost increases over the past couple of years. We believe that breaking out these more expensive services into a separate level of service will allow us to continue to provide reasonable rates for our Basic Service. * Encore: An affordable premium service offering movies from . the '60s, '70s and '80s was launched in June and by fall, already had a remarkable 50~ penetration. * TCI Education Project; A joint effort with cable programmers to bring new, high quality educational programming and support materials to schools through the medium of cable television. * Digital Music Express: The new C.D. Quality Stereo Service kicked off in 1991 and expanded in~1992. FUTURE PLANS: * Customer 1ST Phase III: * Customer Information Campaign: TCI will create a multi- media effort to educate customers on numerous aspects of our business. * System-Specific Customer Service Tracking Studies: We will begin continuous, daily tracking of customer satisfaction in each system owned and operated by•TCI. This research will consist of telephone interviews, conducted by an independent, third-party research firm. A total of approximately 3000 TCI customers will be surveyed each and every week, providing each system with a total of 300 interviews with its customers, annually. * Customer Service Awards: As one incentive to achieve the Company's customer service goals, annual awards will be given to the systems demonstrating the highest levels of customer service. * Community Involvement Awards: Corporate awards will be presented to systems that have made outstanding contributions to their community. . For these reasons and more, we are proud of the successful year we completed in 1991 and look. forward to an even more successful year ahead. As always, we continue to comply with all the material terms and provisions of the franchise agreement with the Town of Vail. Please feel free to contact me at any time, or better yet, stop by for a personal tour of our facility. Sincerely, Stanley F. McKinzie General Manager Heritage Cablevision of Colorado, Inc. SFM:dg cc: Nancy Murphy Carol Johnson a~~tiNrosco~ti RECEIVES ~~f7 ! 3 f99 ~ ~p~p UNITE® STATES DEPAWTNAENT O~ C®INNIEi~CE Borer®au ®f th® C®eese.s a Regional Census Center F~S},97ES of P~~ Lakewood, CO 80235-2307 April 10, 1992 Ms. Margaret Osterfoss Mayor Vail Town Government 75 S. Frontage Road West Vail, CO 8.1657 Dear Ms. Osterfoss, We are planning a series of meetings later this month to discuss the 1990 Census process with local officials, as we begin to pursue preparations for the ,year 2000. in considering which key governmental units to include. in these discussions, your community's name came up, with Randall Phillips being named in particular as an important participant in the 1990 Census. We valued that involvement at the time, and we would appreciate the opportunity to continue discussions with you and' your staff as we plan for the year 2000. As Regional Director, I will be representing the Bureau of the Census at this meeting. In addition I am pleased that Mr. Peter Buonpane, Assistant Director for the Decennial Census from our headquarters in Washington, will be in attendance. We are both eager to hear of your impressions and suggestions for the year 2000. At this informal meeting, we would like to review what worked well in 1990, and also what didn't work so well in the last Census. Beyond this, we would like to look forward and gather your ideas for improving our operations in the year 2000. At the Bureau of the Census, we feel that working closely with local governments is the key to success in a census, and we would appreciate discussing ways that we could make the partnership with local officials stronger in the future. Attached is a list of general talking points to help refresh your memory of the 1990 experience and to provide general guidance for the discussion. With your permission, we also plan to tape record the meeting so that others might be able to review your comments and suggestions in the future as we prepare for 2000. We plan to hold the meeting in a central, mountain community site on Tuesday April 28 at 2 pm. We will call. you to firm up these arrangements in the near future. In the meantime, please contact me at (303) 969-6750 if you have any questions or need add' 'onal information. I am looking forward to the meeting, i er y, William F. Adams Regional Director Attachment w LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP MEETING Discussion Points A) CENSUS PROCEDURES -Enumeration process (April-June 1990) -Census coverage of: -Housing units -People -Timing of Census activities -Issues concerning a mail-out/mail-back Census -Postal Service participation -Issues involving a temporary staff -Motivation -Pay -Census publicity -Local Review of preliminary counts B) LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION -Communications of Census Bureau with local government -Recruiting of qualified temporary Census staff -Maintaining public cooperation with the Census -Concerns for special populations and local problems -Tapping local knowledge as a resource C) OTHER ISSUES -Geographic programs and problems -Social/Technological changes and their impact on Census ' -Count controversies and resolutions -Local government data needs -Open discussion of other issues - - April 90 1992 ~ - R~re Ron Phillips ~ ~ ~ - . Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vailp Colorado 81657 ' ~ Dear . RO1'1 v ~ ~ ~ y. . ~ Just a c~aick note go ' empress ~ 'our , opinion-' regarding the construction of rest rooms .at .the site of the old Mail Ski ~useumo - . . .[nThile we recognize the necessity of providing basic services to our guests o ~ we feel that that site is not a high pedestrian . traffic areao- and would .be •better _iatilized as' strictly an open , space,~~- park area for the'. visual. and -practical .enjoyment for residents .and guests alikeo - Public r~s~rooms~in~general are not-t~iings~of.beauty and as two' female residents of this ~comaiunitya._we .,avoid using,.them like the plague- because - thejr are never welcoming ,from' -a hygienic .and _ olfactory standpoints `The p~comimity of Gatet~ayo Sonnenalp and the " Holiday Inn would seem, 'to make the, 'issue of public restrooins not so criticalo ~ - - - . Can ° t we find a better use for thaic $40 p 000?? - . . . - ~ . Facili~icetiously yoursa ' . , ~ . o - - - ' ~ ' - - Patricia Iierrington ~ _ eanne •I2eid ~ ~ . - _ r - _ - - - ~ INE RECYCLE EAG LE COUNTY r P.O. Box 1000 ~ Avon, Colorado 81620 303/476-8633 WE RECHCLE - Revised 04/05/92 1992 Financialatatement 3 Months werb92.wk1 Actual Actual *~*nQB)udget *t*~~q~)* A tlu~app)l (y1990 (y1991 (1992 (31992 (~199Z Labor Exp n$sea gg 44 99 3 446 Sg5599 ~$u~lax~a~or 1~~931 62;499 5~2U0 17, 2 , R nn 614055 6, 95 62434p o errae~~ts Comp 725 12;25 1,250 Health Insur 462 75 225 22 - ~~$ppub-Total 16,815 86,647 8,259 24,777 25,7?8 OperatingOff3Cese~ 788 2,509 25 75 ontaiHers 2,039 4,137 50 15 enl~phonelies 437 1 531 50 150 Propane Gas 868 333 40 120 Insurance 467 738 .100 300 - uii purchase 464 610 1,830 1,gg ui Maim 360 385 100 300 2 - • Truc Payment 450 1,350 l,3 • Truc Lease 1,153 6,685 505 1,515 1, Truc Gas/Oil 2,678 6,847 750 2,250 2,0 c Mainten 877 4,229 390 1,170 5 Truck Insuran 1,111 1,520 150 450 ~ - ~15) General Maint 275 124 10 30 54 Books/Subscri 69 117 5 15 46 Meetins~ Expense 147 35 1.05 126 Advertising 1,500 0 0 Consulting 400 4 0 .0 0 Education 90 150 0 0 g AcctnglLegal 1,625 51 153 Travel Ex ens 238 576 0 0 32 Depreciation 1,181 4,385 0 0 0 Total Expense 30,445 125,554 11,608 34,824 35,119 Sales Revenue:-------------------------- Glass 8 434 26,831 2,600 7,800 11,~ Glass-Hauling X750) (15,500) (1,300) (3'000) (5~ ~lumi~nu~ Cans 6,305 18,421 1 667 5, uy- ac Alum (1,283) (4,335) X333) (1,000) ~3 ~lumin Scrap 72 166 0 0 vv ewspr~nt 993 8,579 1,000 3,000 2,503 . Newsprint-Hauling (2,001) (250) (750) (2,074) P~a~t csaper 215 100 300 300 Plast~cs -Hauling (250> (50) (150) (300) Corr. Cardb d 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 13,771 32,126 3,433 10.,300 10,530 -------------~--------s---- Net Revenue-Expense (16,674) (93,428) (8.,175) (24 524) (24 589) Subsidies General Contr 10,772 6,064 0 0 75 • Eagle Co 0 62,844 5,833 17,500 17,~QQ - Town Avon 13,000 10,.000 833 2,500 2, UUUVO own Vail 12,300 14,100 1,175 3,525 3,525 own Eag e 0 2,000 .167 500 Town I~133nturn 0 2'820 1670 500 2,00 ---Total_ 36,072 97,828 --8,175 24,525 25,60 Excess Funds 19,398 - 4 400 I - -0 1 1,011 Subsidies (year) ( ear) Eagle County 70,000 Town Avon 10,000 Town Vail 14,100 GT~own Eagle 2 , 000 - M3nturn 2,000 _____________°____-_____-___-_-_-_-_-_-===-=98,100===--_----------- ?.~r rr:CYC:L'.E l~ A L A h C E S H E E T 31.--i~A1;._.c~-~ ~ ;3{ .Jt f •1 a .`::i I::: '1' ci 7~ ~K 'M 7~ CASH ~ Ar.,r.;r.Jl.ll~1~ ~ FiH::CEI'~J,II:;L..l:: CASI-1 I iV FsAI~IK 3 9 7.`'.'i7. ~i3 AC;(~IFiECF1:VAI:{L..1": 'T'F~;AI:iE:: 8g7O3.73 A(r(:;/F;ECC:TVAJr~L.f::: C:l:liJ1~F'tTI:; - 0.04 ~ ~ '1'C1~1'AI.. GA~;F~I ~ A(::(:;/ft1::(::E:::I:VAX:~I...E: 1,.9461.6 F' k U l=' E F't '1' Y 1: 1::071.1:1:1=' hi t=: h! '1' : GhfC 1Fl1JCl`, J94ry~.31 L_L_~:35 Ar.:cul~ x~E::F'r,r::C :y 9 82~.. ob- F'U1~I? 7FtU1:;1< b 9 ].7,.00 f_.E::SS AC0:L1hS Iif°::F'Fif:::C ?60.00- . . 1:{p1~c,Ar L.a,=,c,E-r, j.96ao.ao . I_. k::ciS AC:C;Ui~i L:~li"I~'Fil:::~; 1 ~ 1390.00- ~clurr-'i~iLhlT ~ F~'IXTUhES 169499.97 I_.[5l:i ACC: l.1hS X11::F~'Fi~t; ~94~.74- ~l1-'1' f~'FifJF'I:fi7'Y EC~l.1:r.F'i~ik::hl1' 359134.48 ATF~IkF: A~ia~~fS: 1'C.I._F'HCJhl~: DC~'ClSI'1' O.aO CCIi~l7AlhlEC,S .T.iV F~'F~l:1CF.::cJS ?911~.QO T(~'rAL.. ('1'rFlr:::F~: A;3 !s1=.'1'f:; ?9739.90 ~:~~~;,k rca'rraf... A~~:>~I~:'r;:; Jo93J~::,.b4 L..:r.A><:;1:I...I'1'~E:.~~ Ar~:r.~ E 1.11`!z~ z:;AL..AhlC4= ~>k~ L_ T A )t I_. I 'r 1:1= S (L_ 'r) : ;CiH-1(:1Fi1' '1~C:Fthi L_OAt•! 6O(i.UO f" 4, Fl I~ ~1' r1 1.1 I\ L_ LI A ICI J Y O O O . a a ~;pr~r.A~' L_oAx~~r~ ~aA~! 11, ~~~~3.:~ 1 rp~AL_ L_:CAf~xL.I'ra:f:c:~ ~1..'r) ib9843.21 GUF'tFtC.IJ'1' L_IAL{II._ITTE"S: , AC:CCIUhl1'S f'AYAT:+I...E: 69463.46 C'EIiEF<AI... 1,JIT~,1X~:::S 0.00 5I'ATE wj'rA.c ~ o.oo . r- :E C: A w I 'T li 4•I ti::1_. r.+ 0 . o 0 w :r.cA I:MF-'L..C1Y1~r; o.aa- r:~hil°'L..CIYE:E IiEF'C)l:3:1:1'~; 75.00 C(:lhll'ATi~lE:r; I:i~.F~'[];:i:f.~' 1.9495.00 ~rp'rAL_ L..IA>r{IL.I'r'.r.>~:~~ (C;UF~Ft) 89683.46 I° UNL~ T•.ZALAhlC;1~ ~3 9 797.84 Fil_.VE::hll.lE/SIJF~'!='CIIT L..EL~iCi C:XF'f::l~SE` 1 9 U11 . 13 EhllilhlG F'UNCi EtALAhICr-~ 449808.97 T'C)1'AI... L.IAZ3II...:LTTEC~i R: F~'l.1NZi 1•:+AL.Ai~iCE JO933rJ'.b4 ~ INE RECYCLE EAG LE COUNTY wersum.wkl We Recycle - B.F.I. Recycled Materials 1989 1990 1991 1991 1992 Item ~ Weight Weight Weight ~ (3 mon) (3 mon) Newspaper 157,834 643,973 1,237,701 ~ 297,849 351,120 Glass 64,338 455,235 1,073,540 ~ 325,220 468,420 Office Paper 549 67,874 132,326 ~ 29,669 33,000 Phone Books 0 20,840 15,420 ~ 0~ 0 Aluminum Cans 3,710 27,312 60,252 ~ 14,997 16,970 Plastics 0 0 5,540 ( 0 9,300 Miscell. (est) 0 0 10,000 ~ 0 0 Total (lbs) 226,431 1,215,234 2,534,779 ~ 667,735 878,810 I Total (tons) 113 608 1,267 ~ 334 439 Landfill (tons) 38,548 42,692 47,480 ~ 9989 9353 Percent (1) 0.3~ 1.4~ 2.6~5~ 3.2~ 4.5~ (1) Recyclables as a percent of the waste stream P.O. t3 ox 1000 Avan, Colorado 81620 303!476-8633 THE DENVER POST 4/12/92 Gillett Holdings sought protec- ties to be placed into a U.S. trust to tion from creditors last June after avoid possible questions of ;foreign • ~®_a~ _ a year of unsuccessful efforts to ownership or influence over the TIlV~S P restructure more than $1 billion of stations. Gillett would continue to .junk-bond and other debt issued manage the stations which could • - ~ _ during its rapid expansion in the be sold in a package or individual- ' ; 1980s. - ly as the TV market recovers from y c - The company -whose holdings a deep' slide. Reportedly the include the resorts, the meat-pack- stations are showing modest signs ill ~ ~ ing plants and .television proper- of improved performance. G ties in several states - unveiled a ¦Packerland meat-packing op= complicated restructuring plan in erat_i_ons to be sold. - . ; , February but has since battled dis- ball®tlt ~~~1 . sident lenders who question wheth- er CEO George Gillett and Black ¦ The creation of an intermedi- cut themselves too a sweet deal. ate to long-term capital plan for ' ~ ~ :~•In question are a series.of finan- Vail/Beaver Creek that would in- cial transactions between Gillett elude resort improvements and ssible'new land ac uisitions. In •+,.~:;,~;t ~ - and his company that left the Den- Po q r~~,:;~~:.ixr:; ver entrepreneur, owing about $10 addition, there might be some ' • ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ modest ex enditures for im roved ~ ~ million to the company: P P r•~''` ° _ ~.:yln addition;'Equitable Life In- summertime facilities. Vail/Bea- surance Co., which holds about $28 ver Creek, like many Colorado re- '"million `of Gillett's 12.625 percent . is trying to find ways to op-. ~ fir, N erate at least at break-even levels - ` "bonds, is suing Gillett Holdings in ' a separate bankruptcy proceeding during the summer months. n over whether its claims should get - , ~ - R ~ . - ~pi~iority.status ~ • - - Sources familiar, with the reor- r ~ 3q• ~ " • 'ganitiation say~that tlie.extra mon- k.. ~ _ ~ ey`Apollo is williiig~to invest likely ~~H would•be used.to finance,improve- inents and a significant expansion • at _Vail and Beaver Creek. It also 'could end speculation that• the re- soits'will be"sold quickly once the ' ~ a ~ reorganization is "confirmed by _ Denver's U.S. Bankru tc Court. K ~ • . • ~ Apollo InvestmenE§f ~is _ heavily. il'a. Y' backed by •Altus Finance, a. subsid- Denver Pose File Pnoto ~ ` iay,of the French financial con- George Gillett has lost $200 million or glomerate Credit Lyonnaise: It is. managed,::. Black and other for- more in the collapse of his empire. - .mer, Drex Burnham Lambert, ex- ~5~ ecntives ~ ~ ~ ~ - - By Henry Dubro4f and Adriel Bettelheim 71,1tns+and Black' la t year ~won~ ~x Denver Post Business Writers .c ~ ' .~T;~~~he=bidding for Eaecu ve'Life In- r she Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorga- :=wz`=stialice,Co;'s junk=bond;portfolio. nization of Gillett Holdings Inc. is 1 ~ -w: ~v; s=~=- ~ -f;= reaching a critical stage that ,~~~%Modiflcations to,.3he bankruptcy could lead to a revised deal for. reorganuation plan conld;aiolster~ major creditors. the`long-term'future•":of'Gillett ` Holdings Chairman Gillett ovho,has Reportedly, a group headed by New lost~at least $200 million in the col- Yorkfinancier Leon Black has begun talks lapse of his empire. Gillett is ex- to sweeten terms of a proposed bankrupt- petted to get an salary of $1.5 mil- cy bailout of Gillett Holdings, and make a lion under the- new plan and bigger equity investment in the company's .receive a small equity stake - Vail and Beaver Creek ski resorts. roughly 5 percent - in Gillett Sources say Black's Apollo Investments ~ Holdings. Group, a group of former Drexel Burnham ~ Gillett's personal fortunes were :Lambert executives backed heavily by Al- _ ~ dealt a blow when.IVIike Shannon ;tus, a French financial concern, is pre= • and Larry Lichliter, two top exec- ~~paied to pour more~than•a previously dis- utives at the ski resorts, .stepped ~losed'$40 :million in fresh capital into : down to form their own firm with Gillett Holdings as the newly reorganized - Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, the le- ~company~~'emerges from a Chapter 11 ~ veraged-buyout firm headed by . bankruptcy reorganization. ~ New York financier Henry Kravis. . Their move, however, also put The investor group would be left with at : .Gillett iato a more active role in ~~least a 52 percent.majority stake in Gillett , managing Vail/Beaver Creek. Holdings under. the plan. ~ ° . -When it comes to the resorts, Details ~.of they sweetened•• proposal •are Gillett said recently, "It's my opir.- .;expected to be made public in the coming ion that Apollo/Altus is investing ,weeks ashearinga~ on. the ieorganizatiorr. on what I would describe as a long- 'plan move forward: ~ ' F"'•-~ ~ . ;term basis more than several r. • , years." . ~ . •In' addition to infusing•new~money into ' - .According to~ sources familiar Vail/Beaver Creek,'the revised proposal ` with the talks, the latest negotia- also' also might `include • putting Gillett ~ bons revolve aiound a plan calling Holdings' Packerland meat-packing buss- ; for: ~,r•,''> ; ~ . r~ ~ , Hess in Wisconsin up for sale. ~ - ¦ Gillett Holding's TV (proper- ` _ < ~ ?Yy~~~r~ ,"~l(' ~ p , ~V e C• ~~,6Lla?~"v 1 _ RECE~ ~ ED Af~R s ~ ~w~ Ma or Mar aret W. Car enter ' ' ..•4 and the Thornton Cat Councal :>::><,<::.'~~:::::: . y anvate ou to attend y The Y2th Annual Thornton Symposium May ~ Sheraton Graystone Castle Great Room I-25 and 120th Ave. Registration and Continental breakfast 9-9:30 a.m. Morning Session - 9:30 a.m. to noon The Image of the I,enver Metropolitan Area: Marketing for our long ter»a economic benefit Moderator: John Parr, President, National Civic League Panelists: Richard C.D. Fleming President, Greater Denver Chamber of Commerce (invited) Cathy Reynolds, Councilmember, City and County of Denver Elsie Lacy, Councilmember, City of Aurora Margaret W. Carpenter, Mayor, City of Thornton Joel Edelman, President, Rose Medicad Center Lunch -noon Keynote address - 12:30 p.m. A conversation with 1Vlarc Reisner, author of Cadillac Desert ~'he American West and its Disappearing Y~ater Afternoon Session -1:45-3:30 p.m. How thirsty will we be if we persist in "business as usual?" Address by: Jeris Danielson, Danielson ~ Associates Response by: The Honorable Don Ament, State Senator Dan Luecke, Senior Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund . Michael D. White, Attorney, White Jankowski Reception - 3:30 p.m. Morning session w/continental. breakfast: $20 Afternoon session and keynote lunch: $50 Entire day: $60 Re~istrati®n F®1~~1 a Name: Address: Phone: Company: Names of attendees Amount Enclosed: $ :Advance registration is recommended to reserve your seat. All tickets will be $15 more at the door. For additional information, contact Thornton Utilities Department, 303/538-7406. Piease return registration Loran by 1i~ay ~ to: City of Thornton Utilities Administration 9500 Civic Center Dr. 1 Thomton, CO 80229 1 Attn: Diane Zepeda VAIL VALLEY SPECIAL EVENTS COMMISSION Minutes,April 1,1992 Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room, Present Tom Britz - Vail Valley Marketing Board Kent Gubler - Avon Ken White - Vail Absent Steve Lorton - Vail Associates Margie Plath - Vail Tom Britz called the meeting to order. The minutes of the March • 25,1992 meeting were read and approved with one change; Ron Phillips was removed from the minutes distribution list. A. The commission members reviewed a funding request of $7500.00 from the Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic. After review of the application the commission agreed that a more detailed explanation of the uses of the funds was required before the commission could make a recommendation on the request. In addition the .application needed to be signed by the event chairperson. Tom Britz will write a letter to Ted Martin - event chairperson advising him of our need for additional information and requesting a reply by April 7,1992. B. Our next meeting is scheduled for April 8,1992 in the Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room. The proposed agenda will be: 1. Review the revised Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic funding request. 2. Agree on our proposed Special Event Criteria~Analysis. ~ . VAIL VALLEY SPECIAL EVENTS COMMISSION ' Minutes,March 25,1992 Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room - Present ~ _ Tom Britz - Vail Valley Marketing Board Kent Gubler - Avon Ken White - Vail ' Absent Steve Lorton - Vail Associates ' Margie Plath - Vail Tom Britz called the meeting to order. The minutes of the March 18,1992 meeting were read and approved. A. The commission drafted the following items: 1. Special Event Application Form 2. Special Event Analysis 3. Special Event Pre and Post Evaluation B. A general discussion was held on a potential request for funding of the 1992 Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic. A sponsorship proposal was also reviewed.. C. ~ The commission agreed to provide U.S.Events a draft of the proposed Application and Analysis forms. The proposed format will be used to evaluate the 1992 Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic°s funding request. It was agreed that this review would take place at our next meeting. D. The commission agreed to distribute copies of the approved meeting minutes to the following people: Pam Brandmeyer - Vail ip.~vu.. Cc~-y`K VV F Bi1T James - Avon ~Rd . ~yto R6~06~u.. Frank Johnson - V.V.M.B. ' Pat Peeples - V.A. ~ E. Our next meeting will be April 1,1992 at 7:30 A.M. in Avon at the Rocky Mountain Radio Conference Room. a • SENT 6Y ~ EAGLE COUNTY ; 4- 9-92 ; 13 28 30332672071 3034792157; # 1 / 4 a ° //L ~ • ~ I_-.•_~. ,:2' . A~'1~1 1992 ' 12: l4 . EAGLE COUNTY $UILDING ' 1T• 55 t k~ADWAY OFFICE OF 7HE _ Y ' ~ : F.U. kOX 850 Cp~Ty types . ;s EA(il E. CL~LORAt~O 8169 I (309) 326.8605 ; FhX: (d03) 32H-7307 . ~ EAGLE Cl~U1VT~(, CC}L~RAD?~ . A~~NI~A • ~ BOLD GF C®UNTY C(~NiI1~I~SIOIVrtc3 • . 1tEGl`TLAR NIE~ t'u~G SAY MGIV~AY, AFRIL 13, 1992 09:00 -10:00 ~ WQRI~ SF~~I1.110T - WE~Y iJP'IIA'1'E nrr: gfe9egoryc~as~s James R. Fritze ,County Manager 10:00 -10:4u SENDING LITIGA?'1'10N M2: $fr~ gorr cs~oss Ro~oM Kevin Lindahl, ~~uniy Attorae}+ . 10:43 -11:00 '~~*BItE1~S*** • 1.1:00 - 11:30 P[J~LIC HEAIt1~ei+G 'i~ED A1~ID P~'.S~ I+OI.U'1'I®lY AND ~?D4u aiaAT Fac~cs aovnr~Yx~ Tom Giraa'd, Ward & Pest Coordinator AC,L'~k..Nt Consider w~,~,~.~~~~?a1. • 11:30 -12:00 W(~1~. S~SS10N - »uu~ING AND GIIOUPI~ a!T of v,e gobY CROBSROOM Miks Bradley. Bw1du~ and Gmunds Sly,c.~ risar 12:00 - 01:30 ~ ~~mL[JNCH$:~ ELF,~.i~ Ux.~xCIAI,S 01;30 - 01:45 CONSENT CAIN Xrlt3IL eaO[rN7YROt7h! lIEMB OF d ROPI7II~.!!VD NOI~Fi7PNlROYffiLSLlL 1Y~97UREARE Pld[~D ONTiff~E CQ1ttFBNZ G9/~ND.9R 7CJ AIZ1)iV TRl BOARD OA CYfUArI'Y CDIkf7VLfS701~R4 70 S'PBIVD I1S 77114 Ali? B11ffiR'GY ON MORE IMPOB?.!N!' IlFa6l8 dN d I.SIb?r..a,' AC~ei. d7VP [X~M]I17~51t?11~dt1kLlYRJf'QUTsSR'TAaTANRI°~iB6 °!4FeloV$p°F1ROD~IF~OOIKSFA*!'Cun~vr?aaM~ Lb1V~pER$DSEPrlRd1ELY. +l1VY MI~BPat OF THE PUBt~t~ MAY 1~FQuc yi A1VYIllA!! BB XEdiDY&D" A80A! TH6 G1D111T~N!'AGI4NAA. 1. BtLI. PAYIAdG Idnda P~nkaicb~, Accooating . I.anry Glevex, CamtLrolter • ACl'IQN: Aypmval subject to weview by the County Manager. SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY ; 4- 9-92 ; 13:29 3033267207-' 3034792157;# 2/ 4 2. PAYRUI,L FOR APRIL. i~ I99x dna~ R. Frig, County Manager ACTION: A~ j,.. ~ gal subject to review 1yp tLe County Manager. 3. LIQUOR LICEIV~ HEARING - L,IG,~y,r~G BEAVER CREED, INC. Kevin I.tnda~ht, County Attorasy AcT>GOri: co~ia~c :ter. ~ lay ~ reaesvsl. 4. LIOUOIe LICENSE HEARING - I~TSINGTON 119AATAC~A+IEN~' CORraRATION Revia I.indahl, Cooaty Attaraey ACTION: Consider ~r.,~. fat of ~u.~..,...te s~uotum. S. LIQUOR L?CENSE HEARING - RAGL.E YAII. REST~iiTI~ANT (:ROUI~ LTD. , Kevin Lmdahi, County At~...~~~, ACTION: Consider ~:~,.w.~al of r~ewal. 6. COUNTY 1r.~c;;ar~ANS SERVICE 4~~'~'Ie,~u.S M4b101THLY REIDOR'~ FOR rJARY, 1992 AND MARCH ,19A2 Jack dohasoa, Di.:.~:.,: of Yetatsne oF~iCer At"7'ION: Cmmsider appmvul. 7. Ii,ESOLUTION ,CONCERNING COUNTY'5 iIEDEl~~ } SON OF CERTIFICATE QF F'1JRCHASB E~®NF~UUS TAX LET SQI.D AT TA% $ALI~ (NUMI4ER 19$$365} Sherry Brandon, County Tseaaau+er Kevin Lin~la6], Gnarly Attamey ACTION' Consider ~;~r, gal. RESOLAITION APP1tOYING C~axONW~]1 PUD ILIl4~ffieTAI[1Y PLAN, Alm FOR APPROVAL OF ZONE DIS~daICT AMENDMENT. FILE PD-Z96-91-1~ Sid Fott, Senior P'laflner, Comanavity Aeveilopmemt Kevin Liadahl, ~ouaty Attorney AG°TIOIV: t~aagider ~~~t,.4,,a1. 9. AGREE&fENT ~k A ~„a, ~ EAGLE COUNTY AND MEL MCDANIEL AND WIIV t ~t~5&°I' II~1TF.~PiATI17NAt. 'T'ALENT, IIVC. Jackie Igoy, Flair Coordinator AC'g7ON: Cvnsiddr.:~~.;~.~~~~al. 19. RESOGI, ~ tw~ltk~DOP'I'ING AA~ID~~MFIVTSTOIrACLE COUNTYLJiND i1SE REGrUI.ATIOPdS: 9ECTIbN z,1S.4t3 - °EXElI~,~ nadD10T FROM sL ~ IISION", SECTION 2.21. "MAYOR SUEDIYI; [ON", SEC'd'IDN 2.Z$ - 5111I11t,a rA1. DAT>~,$, Pi~QCEDURES AND FEES" Seith Montag, Duector of Comm~mily Davelaptn~t A+~TION: Coaaidor approval. 11. RF.SOLUTIUN ~GARDIioTG REIR+IItLTN7' TQ BL a x,d.a~.S F'QR CF.RTIF'iCAT>a OF 1~~iriFi'It]N DL1E TO. IN5UFFI.,.~ I)T~CRt,riYON OF ~ PR~~~~,~~.TY Sherry Braadcyn, GoDaty Treasurer ACTION: Consider approval. Page 2 SENT SY~EAGLE COUNTY ; 4- 9-92 ; 13 30 3033267207-~ 3034792157;# 3J 4 Ft~1R~RQ[fN~S ARZEPI® I.iwdaa~ud('r 1~1L1 Tam 3alevretz, Aw~t Building e~ [3rougd$ u rigor ACITON: Cor~d~r arr. ~ ~ aI. 01:45 - 0:16 A. lb'II,Ia 1~[J1V~EII FO-SOT-91-F BLUIE I.~, . + ~IJD aAC~r rovn?rv,eoax Paul Clarkson, Planner} Community Development AC r ir?.YN: Consider approval of final plat subdivisityn im~,~~ ?ement agreement for 70 lots. PLAT SIGNli1°iG Tom Allender, Planner,. Community Development ACTICIN: Consider ar ~r:~ ~ ~ C. NO~~~.E OF AWARD - r~,re~JO IS a~w~T r,n.~,~ESTI~AN BRIDGE John Althoff, Fa~gine~r Mike Bromley, Building anti Grvua~ds Supervisor Sid Fox, Senior Planner, Community Developmentt A~.:~rOI~T: Consider ~~~y~ral. 0:15 - 02:30 ~~~$~o* 02:0 -43:80 WORK SlE55ION - COLOIIADdJ WIEgT MENTAL HEAL'1CH ~ary~ ~utx...o.,...r xe~Gd Raa Blake, Asst. "riiaector of CoIarado West MCntal Health 03:00 -03:45 VirORKSESSIOYIT-COMIaIUI~t~ ~DEVElLU1~~iTUPDATE ~r~a,~sorxr,~ossaac+~ Keith Montag, Director of Cotnmtmity Development 03:45 ®04:15 WORK SESSION - lltUAR1D OF CI?IJIKTY CI~IVIlVI[SI~IOR~r~aS - SHAI~dN(F Ii~ARDING Ih rr,'I'INO51 A i ~ r.~+1D]ED ARID CUIIRZEN`I' CONCERNS ~r~f d?e riorx aevss ROOM 04:00 - 03x80 WORK SIFSSIUN - YAIiI, VALLEY CtbleiSOL~A x 14+'As~ DI~rnICT _ errofeK Aorp crtoss xooar Warren Garbe, Vail Valley Consolidated Water District Nate: No meeting on.'I'uesday Apail, 14 1992 I 1'SES AC~fDA iS PROVIDI3D FbR u~r~.,~s:MATU]NAL PURP'OS bNLY -ALL TES AitB AI~PRORiMA'1'~. TI31; BOARD WHILE YN 'e>~+o~ra~ MAY CbNdlbEe n'l~t dr'8hr8'I~IAT ARB ~t4~U' ~Rir 1T. PA 8 3 SENT SY~EAGLE CO[lNTY 4-10-92 756 3033287207-~ 3034792157;# 1J 1 •::r' • ~ti•" aP~ - 17'16 EAGLC COUNTY 9tlI1.DING 5S1 BROACa1VAY OFFICE OF THE ~ P.O, livK 650 COUNTY MANAGER , ~ •;r EAGLE, C01.ORADO d I (331 (303) 326-8605 ' FAX: {303) 3J8.7~07 EI~GLE Ct~L11VT'~, ~~L~R~?~t~ MEM~I~AlVDI.TM TO: All nu~lia and interested parties • FIrd7lVt: tames R. Fritze, county Manager DnTE: M$rch 30, 1992 RE: ~I+ Vj,jpAY. A~I~ 13. 199.E AGENDA, Tk+e following item is being added to the consent calendar at 1:34 p_m. 1., 1992 at 1.00 p.rn. 0J-.30 - OI:AS I3. CQNTRA?CT WITH EIiTD~~,~E, INC. TQ 9~RF~ ~~'S AT i r, EAGLE CDiT1MI1'Y LANDFIIII. James R. Fritze, Caumty Managar If you ham any questions please call Frances Barela, Office Manager ~k 325-8605. • Thank yau!. . JDL/tj cc: Eoard of County C3amsvtissioneas Jack D. Lewis, Assistant County Mana~gea Kevin Lindahl, Cue><nty Attorney Jahnnette Phillips, tvlerk to the Board SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ; 4- 9-92 ; 13:31 ; 3033267207 3034792157;# 4/ 4 FAGLE COIBJTY HIALDING 551 RR4ADV/AY OFF)tE aF THE P.O. HO% 850 COUNTY MANAGER FAGLf, COl O~AL)a 81 fi3 I {303) 328.8605 •,::;•;i'~ , FAX; (3031 378-]20] ~y'. .._EACLE C(Jl1~VTY, COL~R~~C9 ~r~~vi~RA1VDUM TO: All media and interested parties FROM; James R. Fritze, County Manager G~ DATE: Apri19, 1992 R1E: ~VEDNE~AY. APRI~.15. 1 The Bag1e County hoard of Cornrnissioners will attend the F,agle County regional Meeting to be held ~•n L ~ 9Hr~tas dny, April 15, 5:15 p,m, to 7:15 p.m. pax koom Should you have any questions please call Frances Barela, Uffice Manager at 328-8605. Thank you} ~ • . JRFItb v DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST, BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN _ DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE GREG HALL MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCHOLL CAROLINE FISHER JIM HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX ~ll-DET'0~ LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER FILE JODY DOSTER MANUEL MEDINA MEMORANDUM TO-: RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER FROM: KEN HUGHEY, INTERIM DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: APRIL 13, 1992 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF APRIL 13 - 17, 1992 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. "Continue spring clean up of cinders throughout Town and haul them off. 2. Remove totem poles at east end of Mountain Haus. 3. Paint Town Engineer's office. . 4. Clean West Vail culverts on north side. 5. Investigate Highway Department plowing Vail Pass bike path. 6. Obtain approvals for installation of banner poles on Bridge Street. • 7. Inventory and stock rock at Meadow Mountain for Willow Bridge project. 9. Paint new gate arms. 10. Restripe crosswalks at little 4-Way and lst Bank. 11. Break down winter equipment for summer operation. 12. Sweep East Vail Bike Path.' PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1. Confirm with PCL, west exhaust fan status. " 2. Repair Library smoke sensors. 3. Clean up cinders. 4. Assist electrician at Municipal Annex Building. 5. Investigate the retrofit of th_e Golfcourse Clubhouse ' turnaround. 6. Number all bus stops. " CARPENTERS A. 1. Construct "project" for Library. 2. Construct cabinets and shelves for new Com Dev. 3. Refinish benches. 4. Install chair rail in Public Work's Admin. building. 5. Construct 5 suggestion boxes for Personnel Office. i t ' PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Continue remodel work at Old Post Office. 2. ~ Contact William about computer room lighting system. 3. Repair ground fault - LHTRC fire alarm system. 4. Repair lights at the following locations: . a. Tunnel light b. Bighorn street light c. Concert Hall Plaza 5. Order exhaust fans for Police Department locker rooms. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Finalize Stephen's Park easements with Larry Eskwith. 2. Contact Larry Eskwith regarding Weed Ordinance. 3. Investigate alternate planting containers far VTRC. 4. Work with planners on Ski Museum site. KH/dsr AGENDA Present Absent LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY Simonett Bishop REGULAR MEETING Thomas Fried APRIL 8, 1992 Wilson 10:00 A.M. 1. Consideration of the Authority of a registered manager for Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., dba, Sonnenalp Restaurant: Andreas H. Conhoff replacing James Phillips ANDREAS CONHOFF PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 2. Consideration of the Authority of the following for D A B Investments, Inc., dba, Holiday Inn - Chateau Vail: a. Corporate Structure Change Dora Martinez, remaining as President, and replacing Luis F. Ponce as Vice President, Irma Diaz as Secretary, and Veronica Cedillos as Treasurer Dora Martinez remaining as sole director, replacing Luis F. Ponce, Raul Carrillo, and Ramiro Ruiz MARCO ALMARAZ PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 b. Renewal APPROVED: 3-0 3. Consideration of the Authority of the following for Henault Investments, Inc., dba, Blu's Beanery:~ a. Corporate Structure Change Philip A. Henault now 48% stockholder, formerly 77% Thomas J. Armstrong now 52% stockholder, formerly 23% TOM ARMSTRONG PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 b. Modification of Premises APPROVED: 3-0 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/Spirituous Beverages, for the Town of Vail, on Saturday, May 16, 1992, and Sunday, May 17, 1992, from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. each day, at the location of Ford Park/Lower Bench/700 Block of South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: Rondall V. Phillips - Town Manager Susan Scanlan - Events Manager SUSAN SCANLAN PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 5. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a 100% transfer of a Hotel and Restaurant License, with extended hours, held by Fujimo, Inc., dba, Noodles for Pasta, to Newlands, Inc., dba, Noodles for Pasta, at the location of 950 Red Sandstone Road, #43 and #44, Vail, Colorado. a) David Kim Labuschagne - President/100% stockholder/ Director Peter H. Rudy - Secretary PETER RUDY PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 b) James E. Phillips - Registered Manager/stock option JAMES PHILLIPS PRESENT. APPROVED: 3-0 6. Notification to the Authority of a change of trade name for Alien II, Inc., dba, The Refuge, to Alien II, Inc., dba, L'Ostello. 7. Notification to the Authority of intent of Steven Satterstrom, Inc. , dba, Satch's Restaurant at the Clubhouse to use optional premise from April 1, 1992 through April 30, 1993. 8. Notification to the Authority of recent renewals: a. Todd P. Milner, Inc., dba, The Club b. James P. Nosaf, dba, East Vail Spirits APPROVED: 3-0 9. Any other matters the Authority wishes to discuss. a. REMINDER OF SPECIAL MEETING: Wednesday, April 22, 1992, 1:30 P.M. Suspension/Revocation Hearing for Lionshead Bar & Grill TOWN OF VAIL " Vail Local Licensing Authority ff . K~ ~Mar~ha S: ~Raecker Secretary to the Authority ` ~ WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP April 10, 1992 Page 1 of 2 ' TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS i 1991 05107 SALES TAX COLLECTION LARRY/STEVE: Research remedies to change this to Draft ordinance forwarded to Forest Service and VA for (request: Gibson/Lapin) a mandatory TOV tax collection. review. Forest Service response unclear. Communication between all parties will continue. 11119 NEWSPAPER VENDING LARRY: What can be done to make these uniform and Discussions have begun with vendors. Voluntary MACHINES locations less prolific? agreement still being pursued, 1992 01/21 EVENING PARKING MIKE ROSE/STEVE B.: Evaluate financial Mike Rose has put together raw data which is being STRUCTURE FEES ramifications of eliminating parking structure fees analyzed by the Finance Department. To Council (request: Lapin) after 6:00 p.m. each night. Further review summer 4/21/92, free parking, generating numbers to show revenue and expenses if some nominal fee were to be charged. 01121 BEAVER POND KRISTAN: Check with FEMA experts and Interfleuve, Three reports received from Interfleuve, Hydrosphere, REVITALIZATION Hydrosphere, and Wetland Aquatics to see what solutio and Wetland Aquatics will be analyzed by Community what might be appropriate to revitalize this pond Development and Todd 0., and then presented to (i.e., dredging or other means). Council. 02104 HERITAGE CABLEVISION CAROLINE: Prepare new letter of protest for Mayor's Will do upon return of Merv. FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS signature. XC: Newspapers, Dillon, Minturn, etc. (request: Lapin) 02/11 HORSEDRAWN CARRIAGE KEN/LARRY: Prepare extension to agreement, Advisory Committee to help draft standards of AGREEMENT including possible provisions for hobbling, dragging operations and other criteria. Draft contract weights, and other options. to be presented to Council prior to signing. Back to Council by 4121192. Dave Sloan, Carnage Rides, Inc., is currently not doing business. WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP April 10, 1992 Page 2 of 2 '~i TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS i 02/17 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTAN/ANDY: Draft ordinance. Draft Ord. No. 6, Series of 1992, to Council on 4/14/92. 03/10 AFFORDABLE HOUSING KRISTAN/LARRY: Draft ordinance. Draft Ord. No. 9, Series of 1992, to Council on 4/21/92. PROVISIONS ORDINANCE 03/10 LIONSHEAD SALES TAX FIGURES STEVE B./STEVE T.: Packy Walker, on behalf of the Will investigate. (request: Osterfoss, Levine, LH Merchants Assn., is requesting an accounting of Gibson, Steinberg) sales tax taken from a square footage basis, standard number (such as Dow Jones) of businesses reporting, to offer a comparative analysis. 03117 GOAL SHARING SESSION COUNCIL: Carl Neu will be facilitating agoal-sharing session to include the Avon Town Council, Eagle County Commissioners, and Vail Town Council, probably all day on Monday, 4127192. Please mark your calendars. More details to follow. 04/07 REVIEW RETT LARRY: Schedule for Council review. Scheduled for 4121/92 work session. 04107 USE TAX ON CONSTRUCTION LARRY: Prepare ordinance for implementation January Scheduled for 4128192 work session. MATERIALS 1, 1993. 04/07 FORD & DONOVAN PARK TREES TODD 0.: Tom has counted 27 dead spruce in Ford Will do. (request: Steinberg) Park, and although they shouldn't necessarily be removed, they should be checked for disease.