Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992-05-12 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session
, VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 Qa 6:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. PEC Report. 2. Other. 3. Call to Order: Regular Evening Meeting. 4444444444444444444444 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 7:30 P.M. REVISED AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 5.08 -Business and Occupation Tax -Ski Lifts, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. 3. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance rezoning a parcel of property* from Public Accommodation District to Public Use District, generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the rezoning of said property. ('Commonly referred to as the "Ski Museum Pocket Park") 4. Discussion of Pitkin Creek Townhome Bond Restructuring. 5. Adjournment. C:WGENDA.TC ~ VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 @ 6:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. PEC Report. 2. Other. 3. Call to Order: Regular Evening Meeting. ~4~Oab4~b~~~O~~~T~~{i~~4 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Ten Year Employee Recognition. * Joe Van Auken, Police Department. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 3. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Chapter 5.08 -Business and Occupation Tax -Ski Lifts, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. 4. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance rezoning a parcel of property* from Public Accommodation District to Public Use District, generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the rezoning of said property. (*Commonly referred to as the "Ski Museum Pocket Park") 5. Adjournment. C:IAGENDA.TC I~ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION May 18, 1992 AGENDA 12:15PM Site Visits 1:30PM Worksession 2:OOPM Public Hearing l~lorksession at 1:30PM Worksession on an Eagle County referral concerning an Environmental Assessment for the Avon to Vail 115 KV Transmission Line: Applicant: Holy Cross Electric Staff Member: Susan Scanlan Site Visits Public Hearing 1. 1. A request for a conditional use permit for the Vail Team Tennis facility, generally located to the south of the Lionshead Skier Bridge and north of West Forest Road on the existing tennis courts, and more specifically described as follows: A part of the NW'/a of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th PM, Town of Vail, Eagle County, Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 2, Vail Village 6th Filing, according to the map thereof recorded under Reception No. 99380 in the office of the Eagle County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder bears S80°50'59"W 103.58 ft; thence N08°09'53"W 126.74 ft; thence N80°53'20"E 286.55 ft; thence S07°47'19"E 127.66 ft; thence S81°04'13:W 285.70 ft to the point of beginning, containing 0.835 acres, more or less. Applicant: Vail AssociatesNail Recreation District Planner: Mike Mollica 2. 2. A request for a wall height variance for the Bully Pub terrace and a rear setback variance for the swimming pool at the Sonnenalp Bavaria Haus, 20 Vail Road/Lot L, Block 5-E, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Johannes Faessler Planner:. Andy Knudtsen 3. 3. Worksession on a conditional use permit for the Alpine Garden at Ford Park. 4. Streetscape.flan-Distribution of Final Report. 5. Approval of PEG Minutes May 11, 1992. SUS s' c d ~ ~ G3 Q D TOWN OF VAIL ~ 7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Community Development Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2138/479-2139 May 18, 1992 Mr. Paul Clarkson - Planner Eagle County Community Development_ P.O. Box 179 Eagle, Colorado 81631 Dear Paul, As requested, the Town of Vail has reviewed the Environmental Assessment: Avon to Vail 115 kV Transmission Line submitted by Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. On May 18, 1992, Richard Brinkley, Bob Ballinger and Walt Dorman of Holy Cross Electric made a presentation to our Planning and Environmental Commission on the proposed line. Our commission members expressed the following concerns which we would like to refer to you. (1) It is important for Holy Cross to take whatever steps are necessary to minimize the disturbance of the natural vegetation. As many trees as possible should be saved and those areas which must be disturbed should be revegetated. (2) They expressed concern over the siting of the poles for the line which will cross Red Sandstone Road on the approach to Piney Lake. They would like to see every effort taken to utilize natural openings in the vegetation while minimizing visual impacts on the approach to Piney Lake. (3) They understand that one span and pole of the line which parallels the existing line will be visible as it enters the substation above Potato Patch from the ,valley. (4) They agree with the Holy Cross recommendation to use Core l0 steel for the poles which will rust naturally and blend with the landscape to reduce the visual impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposal. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, ~ S an Sc n an Environmental Health Officer xc: US Forest Service Vail Town Council Planning & Environmental Commission Ron Phillips, Town Manager ~ 1~5 5~~9•yd~ c9ff~.eu~ AVON TO VAIL - 115KV TRANSMISSION LIr?E 9.7 MILES CONSISTING MAINLY OF SINGLE POLE WITH S~;VERAL THREE POLE STRUCTURES This project may seem familia..~• to some or all of you due to the fact that we were plan:iing the same project in 1987. At that time, we received the USFS Special Use Permit and in 1988, the EA was co~~pleted. The project was put on hold in 1988 due to our power supplier having financial problems and other related matters. A. PURPOSE & NEED FOR PROJECT. The purpose of the project is to provide a loop feed for the Vail area. Presently, only one 115KV line services Vail from the Avon substation to the Vail substation. The present 115KV line has had two major outages which could have 'been considerably worse. In .1982, a six hour complete outage of the Vail substation occurred. In 1986, a sixteen hour complete outage occurred. These two outages were caused by trees falling into the transmission line causing a reclosure at the Avon substation to operate and lock out. The inaccessibility of the transmission line requires a great deal of time to walk the right-of-way. Neither trucks or an ATV will access the right-of-way. Had the trees broken a conductor or a pole, the earlier mentioned outages could have taken days to repair and the Vail area would have been without power for that period. We have accessibility - ~ i to helicopters in Colorado but none large enough to lift and carry the wood poles required to repair this line. It appears the nearest helicopter that is large enough to do the work is in Washington State. The new 115KV line can be accessed the entire length by either an ATV or snowmobile in a short period of time. The , line will be designed so that a helicopter in our area would be able to carry parts required to repair the line. With the loop feed, if we lose one line, a momentary interruption would be the only thing noticeable to Vail. In other words, a slight dip may occur. The new line would put the Vail - area in a very good position regarding transmission line failures. The Vail area, with regard to distribution ~°oltages, is in a very good position now. A distribution outage may occur but the breakers and loop feeds we have currently i~n the distribution area, make it possible to isolate the fault in a short period of time so that no one is out of power or only a feca might be out in the case of a transformer failure. B. COST & MAINTENANCE. Holy Cross Electric gives an extremely high priority to provide the best possible service to the Vail area. The new line will cost approximately 3.1 million plus another 1.5 million in substation work at Avon and Vail to accommodate the new line. The work will mean no increased revenue to Holy Cross Electric. It is strictly to provide the best service we can to the Vail Area. The existing line is flown twice~a year with a helicop- ter and walked several times a year. Any problems found during these inspections are taken care of immediately. The new line will be inspected in the same manner. In the past 18 years, the line has also had 10 momentary interruptions. The reclosure at the substation operated but the fault cleared and service was maintained. The line was walked after each of these occurrences to establish the cause of the momentary interruption. In most cases, trees had fallen into the line and then fallen free. Another danger with this occurrence is fire. Fires are caused by the burning and arching of the tree coming in contact with the 115,000 volt conductor. Luckily, conditions were such that the fire burned itself out before a raging forest fire occurred. C. LOCATION OF NEW LINE. As shown on the maps, the green line represents the location of the new line, separated from the now existing line. The location has been picked and approved by the Environmental Assessment, USFS, and Holy Cross Electric. The route was chosen because of it's easy accessibility, minimal tree removal requirements, natural screening by remote canyons, and distance from the existing line. The distance between the two lines will provide greater safety if a storm or natural disaster occurs in that if one is taken out, the other will probably remain intact. A great + ~ deal of time and effort has gone into the planning of this route which is hidden from the Vail Valley almost entirely. D. CONSTRliCTION. Our schedule is to receive approvals from towns, coun- ties, etc., by October, 1992. The bidding will be received by November, 1992. Right-of-way clearing and construction is to be done between May-October, 1993. The new line is to be energized by November, 1993. No new roads will be constructed for the project which is a USFS condition. Poles will be either steel or another approved material. They will be constructed in pieces so a smaller helicopter can be used to fly them to the sites and install them relatively easy. The conductor will be a non-reflective type. The insulators will be a rubber type so gunshots will not cause an immediate problem. In several of the large canyons, aerial marker spheres will be installed on the conductors, per the DOW require- ments. Work will be done mostly with helicopters. Manpower will enter the right-of-way by existing roads, ATV, or helicopter. Holes will be dug by small machines which will be flown in or dug by hand. The right-of-way width will be 100'. xc . . RECEIVED MAY 1 ~ 1992 ,.~i,: . ~ EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING 551 BROADWAY P.O. BOX R50 OFFICE OF THE EAGLE. COLORADO 81631 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~ ~ ° ~ FAX: (303) 3?8.1207 (.03) 323-8605 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO May 13, 1992 State Wildlife Commission Hand Delivered Dear Members of the Commission: The Division of Wildlife is again trying to change the fifty (50) foot set back on trapping within Vail. Our understanding was that regular status was given to the limitation at a meeting of the Commission last fall. The County Commissioners remain unanimous in the opinion that the fifty (50) foot set back is appropriate for the area. The unique circumstances of trapping in and around Vail warrant the restrictions. Any change in these rules is a step backwards. We strongly encourage the Commission to keep these restrictions in place in Vail. Sincerely, EAGLE COUNTY George ~ " Gates County Commissioner cc: Governor Roy Romer Town of Vail Don Everet Eagle Valley Humane Society Perry Olsen, Division of Wildlife To~, DIVISION OF I RANSPOR ~ A I IOf~ MONTHLY SERVICE SUMMARY APRIL,. 1992 RECEIVED MAY ~ 5X992 AV m ~ P.O. BOX 1726, AI/ON, CO 81620 Tefephcna 303 949 6121 MONTHLY RIDERSHIP SUMM.~,RY OCI': NOY' .::DEC: ' !AN : .FE3. ' i. `tthR:°.: 'AP~t : :'':bdAY: ° 'AINE E~~:::. ]I1LY' E ',`Al7ff SEP"I'..: ~ :FOTAL::' I LEADVr[ r F I 9t-92 1020 7480 2719 2776 7230 2282 1171 13708 90-91 647 1880 2680 2984 2847 3180 1813 809 12x2 1474 1480 1100 27778 VAIL t-70 97-92 ' 0 1452 36608 40505 35088 42102 9855 766010 90-9t 0 2x18 254..59 41188 39838 38570 9734 0 972 5284 5888 971 169398 HwY 5 BEFORE SA.Lt 91-92 0 720 3681 4880 3850 3829 1447 I 18781 90-91 0 ~ 744 4054 6712 4799 4271 1132_ 0 0 I 0 0 0 20772 IiWY 6 AFTER SASI 9t-92 0 7247 8622 9882 8988 9849 3832 x2798 90-81 0 473 4960 7281 5665 5863 388 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 I 2x581 AVON BEFORL• SAbf 9t _92 0 175 7539 1720 1283 1279 410 I 8:08 90-97 0 637 4712 4256 33021 3606 1096 0 I 0 ~ 0 0 0 77609 AVON AFTER BAM 9t-82 15 2239 40222 38417 35404 48013 7218 1695x6 90-91 0 3988 28129 32812 31990 43078 10145 0 13 T4 20 0 150030 CHARTER 97-92 842 S84 1145 2816 3086 3280 10983 22513 90-81 472 491 991 863 2254 3147 13922 829 5068 3682 5267 350'0 40x08 PARKING LOT BEFORE 8AM 91-92 1137 7891 7883 8288 8389 10814 1735 39x"97 90-87 0 1970 8078 8812 9103 10982 1473 440 1850 1768 1270 1397 4s92t1 PARICING LOT AFTER SAM ~ 97-92 2117 ~ 8259 47198 83158 66755 85389 4196 277254 I 90-91 1833 9947 60241 70283 74292 79123 15467 ~ 0 j 3407 ~ 4780 7889 4095 I 33;731 j INTRAVTLLAGE f ~ 91-92 0 701 '5468 5938 5729 9108 132. .270761 90-9t. 0 775 6526 6433 6331 8x50 867 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 29380 CREEK AOUTE 91-92 0 489 5310 6882 6833 8371 837 25x42 90-81 0 466 2587 2701 2875 5040 486 0 0 0 0 0 14131 MOUNTAIN ROUTE 97-92 0 847 6564 7815 7677 10308 423 33429 90-91 0 602 BS86 8874 8071 17432 2219 0 0 0 0 0 35726 DIAL A RIDE 91-82 400 7339 11170 11931 12534 18010 2893 58077 90-91 120 1309 70757 10921 11498 178b2 3415 338 2918 8237 4872 8003 78138 o'rt~n 91-92 4b4 76 112 2097 979 848 133 x433 so-st tz6, l4so toss I 23x3 I 2002 I 1493 x42 ` o i o I o I 6o I 636 1,754 I ~ !I YTD TOTAL 90-y- a2?3 ~ 226849 I 1685791 ~ 203331 ~ 203995 I 235861 I 82493 ~ 2218 ~ 75168 I 23279 ~ 28898 I 17764 I 9879572 I . OPEAATED 8Y THE TOWN OF A VON TRH NSPOP. T.i TlON DI V!SlON 0~" A Vic.-p ~~EE~ ~ - ~ P.O. 60X 1726, AVON, CO 81620 Telephone 303 949 612 i EMPLOYEE RIDERSH~AS PERCENT OF TOTAL, 1991 - 1992 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMDER IANUARY FEBRUARY ~1AAC11 APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUOUST SEPTEMDER TOTAL d'9 'ii96 1~''~ A'3 ~ 46 _.t'I. II'9 N'9 A'S IV'3 ~ % ~ N'8 rt:g6,:;,i:,l~i;~ A'9 ; p A'S % _'.-i I /'8 1:96 l ~~ia M g n~'y A'S c'L'!,,~li;f N'8 ~94!~' : I~ 1 I 11 ,I. 100 ~I. ' LTD ~ 1020 x,..100 14D0 tOQ 2718 1100 2774 ,100:: 2280 ' 100' 22D2 1001 1171 li ':5 ( ' I 1 ~ i 1j'I ; II~. r! ' VAIL I I I ' ' III - 11 ?d - I ~ 1 1. I " ~ ~ I'1t1 NWVB I I'rt 1440 III+73 7322 eb 9720 I .8~ 7300 68 7858 ' S8 2882 it 57. ,i 1 I,, ' ,I 1 I . IL 1 I I, k 1 I I r( I ! I~"II 1 I , Q1~1,i 1 I II: l .I i I . It I ICI I~ II h I:i I ~d' 3078 .9'111 w' I I i V I i I ' I I ~I'~ ' ~ ~ I AVON , , 350 I ~ ,I ! 71 , rp7 : 3440 ~ 2588 .7. 2550 ltii . 410 I I I b ~ ~ ` 1 ij' I~''~ 7 {il rll 1111, j L.I I I i LJ 1 i'I~ i.i~ I:~ II I'_'il.: ! II I' t J ~i ~ 1 I ~ ~ I III ~ - I' ~1e 1 III Ij I ti I'~ I 1 II ~ -call.. - i ' II I. ..I%. I I ~7I 1 ~~j I ~ I ,t6.i III 1U~l I.i! I I 1.. I I.~ -,~I PAFKLOT 1368 +~2.j 3382 1 '3~• 15388 'I„28': 10538 I '1;23;. 18738 22" 21820 ' 2~'! 1735 IrI'~12g I , IL= I;, it III Ii~l ~!i I :,i;i ~ I I 1 u ' I ' ' 1': ~ I;11., ~ ! N I,' lII h jii ! I'Ilii1 :i:'IJ:..: i ;'uU, ~ i Lf.,I ' ij ~ ;i ~ ~ i<: OTHER ~'I 16 ~tbb. 112 {oo~ 209) 'II~I~O~ 979 I I00 049 i9d: 133 ',I I' 19A~ I ~ I:I: , f' ' ' ' ~ r~ AI I. Ii ~ I ~tl i. ~II~! 1.1.1, II,IIII ~I i~J Ill.~jl '11~~i ' ~ Ill ~il 7~ 1~ ~I'Iill I~,!I I' I , I ~ II~i ~.1I..p I,i I; I :I I III IrN. i', iq I,j.. I ,Iy 1 11 I il,. i .I _ _ _ ~ - _ _r, _,a14 TOTAL 2310 40 8GG7 ~ 31.. 20597 ' i., ,Itl 34501. ~ 1, 1Y: 290A9 . „ , 15 34775 I 1,d.. 8331 - - + :l !~I ~ . , ~ ;l ' ' t c~ ; ; : ~ . . R~E E) . P.O. BOX 172G, AVON, CO 81620 Telephone 303 949 6121 SERVICE HOUR SUMMARY 1991-92 OCTODER NOVEMDER DECEMDER JANUARY FEDRUARY MARC{i APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUQUST SEPT. TOTAL (;.:BUD;ACT UUD;;-;ACTL. ODU.:'A(.T.~ >,BUO ACT ..BUD:: ACT`:. BUU:'=`AC7i;::` UUO'ACT~;';BUD:.iAC'T ::BUU'ACT: UUD,~i'A(rt:;,[~UDjACTI:F3UD;;`/1CT:sbl1D~;:ACT': COUNTY LCA UVILLE 93 83 160 1B0 279 279 279 279 281 281 279 317 106 289 93 90 93 93 90 1986 1760 VAIL(I70) 684 210 1652 1916 1652 1946 1664 1798 1662 2001 716 1067 7820 8937 FIVVl' 6 BEFORE 8AM 90 31 279 239 279 290 281 271 279 314 117 175 1305 1320 (IWY 6 AFTER 8AM 270 124 837 1067 837 1046 783 988 837 1034 351 643 3916 4902 IIWY 6 188 120 282 96 86 188 180 188 188 180 1320 347 TOTAL 279 93 1214 807 3047 3500 3047 3563 2069 3318 3047 37?G 144Fi ?759 279 270 279 279 270 16325 17264 - - - -----°--I---- - _ - i AVON I AVON SKIER SIIUTTLE 558 182 1278 1371 1228 1373 1213 1289 1303 1431 438 812 6018 8438 I AVON TOWN SIIUTII.E 18 48 44 372 357 ( 372 365 348 321 372 347 168 208 1680 1848 I CIIAR'i~ER 126 196 60 82 140 196 110 473 210 627 340 434 200 306 160 650 300 300 60 2535 2212 I TOTAL 125 211 666 288 1790 1923 11710 2201 1771 2137 2015 2212 BOG 1324 150 650 300 300 50 10233 10296 _ BEAVER CREEK I PARKING LOTS d! SPEC 780 297 1811 1477 1686 1788 1720 1598 1868 1876 690 785 8463 7600 INTRA VILLAGE 222 72 674 523 674 659 537 646 674 688 222 304 2703 2569 CREEK ROUTE 240 85 820 641 620 695 680 662. 820 899 240 352 2920 3134 MOUNTAIN ROUTL 240 64 620 666 620 625 680 581 620 616 240 341 2920 2913 DIAL A RIDE 868 206 1774 1418 1774 1529 1681 1515 1784 1700 763 955 8'~ 7323 SUMMER 5{(UTlL[. 620 873 300 667 340 720 981 901 880 4690 1240 TO"i'AL G20 873 2460 1311 b399 4725 5274 5176 6098 4901 5464 5250 2055 2737 340 720 981 981 688 30030 24779 TOTAL 11024 977 4330 2406110238 10148 110031 10940 9738 10354 10526 11194 430G 6320 789 1540 1540 1540 11008 156588 .52339 j 0~ A V FP • ~j/~ ' P.O. BOX 1726, AVON, CO 8 i 620 Telephone 303 949 G 12 i REGIONAL MONTHLX FINANCIAL SUMMARY 1992 APRIL APRIL APRIL TOTAL YTD YTD YTp REVENUE UUDCIiT ACTUAL VARIANCIi UUDGE'T UUDGE"T ACTUAL VARUINCE ~LEADVILLE $6,228.00 ~'`<.:5 q2"° ~ ..:;:;:;.~:.:!::.:.:'~,.5(]ii ($1,204.50 ::~s'$6~ 203t.:-'' :;!:a:. ) .::...::<:>:.:,.,....:.,...~(~C~~~ $33,908.00 ::::.$21'.3$8';0.::: 1 `iii:i ::!r,::c:!::::~.:: 1..,... Q.:.! 2,520.00) <i;?r~~;~ i:j :;tl . P S ' A S 3 $2,8 0.00 `?:`>:`:°'"1~•. ,~'5~.Q~T:~ $10 140.00 :.:.::.:$~~~•~55DU" $19 716.00 30120 , 1 20 .00.:.: .9Q....... 270 $ .0 ,.:.$.1.1. ~9b.,dU... ~ $8 790. 00 ~:7:: r.:::::;; $ :.22.00.. 1 ~::i ,.y.......... $332.00 IN S G - LC $ 28 05 00 ~ s ~t $8 270.00 :,:`.'i~ i 77.00 i".:::::::: ;:>r<:::;:;:; ~2.?C1 l1~t0;U0;: $197 9 , . ; $237..5~Q.0.(1.:.: $39 811.00 TOT , ALS 13 $ 25 5 :.:.:.::$24.Q85~0.0:.:. i $11 430.0 .,,,.5.. tl.;.; $59, 658.00 .00 . ';iii G RA ND TO TA 19 $ 483 50 €iifii:f I5`stsai5 `E 29~ .7 . 5 08: $ 0 . ,,.........i:..Q:. $250 815.00 ~`i.? :::..::::::::::r:.::::::: 1 0 2 $ 25. ...$3A•7 7'92 0 $`29~, 95"3. DO,:.: $47,138.00 ~j! °7€: ' 'fii EXPEN S E 5 $ 87 39 .00 '`i~8 6 2 :5+t~' r $28 536 .54 k. . <s$7 1 5 2.00 ?'::`.''i>:$~~ i:.::6~`"'.>?': ( 2 .0 . .Q 2. d. 3 4 6 5,.x.......29 $11 294.29 HOURS ,:si::ii€; ( ) 1 6 44 9.i 1 ......1.83 ' ~ 1040 8 - 246 6 Ml LES ~ . 5.. b fi . ...3. ..4~:.. REVENUE EUDGET OCT. NOV_ _ DGC. JAN. FGU. MARCH APRIL MAY JIiNG IDLY AUG. SEPT. TOTAL 207G~^('':~9A4:~ 8304 !r+;i:i::'8t~98: 899 ,;::.J.;:.:.:: ::a ;:i[~H:~,~,.;.,...-:r.l G ;O.dB.~iii; 8228: •::'27G~::i 4152 i;;:48>i1l.::: 4844 ~3t1t33,:, 69203 C OU N TY R Ea I IONA L ~~3~i:~: j` ''i... i :'i'f :i.. •:c::;: ~1~:::. . , I:. I.: ~ .I'. ~I , I J iti ~'ii`'~~ iii: 1~:; I: o-q Y: . !I: . :.I i:.f I i ..I . I. ~ !"i I: P S .l~.:., S . A ~y~ 00 i.,y,, If: 36 ~ i!?~ . 0. A 2270 I1.. Z 33 ; . OD.: 0 ~;C330°° 300 . 00 3 7~`~~i 157 . 50 20 30 I I~I~lii~ . _ i. ~ is<'G U 22 "i ~.:.i.: 20 0 ~ 1890 Ab:.:. Z. 120 • Uii ::'r•':': f $ 60 , 119 90 ~':ii :i'i:~::::i . ~ SING LE 473 00 ~ 59 7 28 87:'1 7 1280 _ 5 tl 09 709 250 849 ,::::::.1::: TOT AL COUN TY ' 3 5.. 5 1 r 3 ~ 8i ~ 7`~ 344 ' ..1i(3A~. 7' 1 i3 ~ 2 5 i 0' 1 069 "1; ~O" 0 9 ~ 1 6 85 27 89 . . . ~~;i!'~ . i.i. rtY~:':ii:K' t....... . i!!~~ i':'~ i':~ ....I.:~:! taao-~ : ii;(ii~iiiEEti`; i .1. : ..I. i' ~ ~i': [i:'i:'j~i~;' ~ I , ili: i is i:h4:Y[ I .,i i~ N dT0 , . T AL d' 207 , ~i# 9 :,I.I. 1314 : , 4 2 72443 ::;<~~1:05 19483 :•.:E:;a!tr.... 5221 ;:::;:::::;r: 347792 p~ A vr? ~C REE. P.O. BOX 1726, AVON, CO 81620 Telephc~a 303 949 612 t 1992 APRIL MONTHLY BUDS 1 DETAII. COUNTY SYSTEM APR II.. APRIZ. MAY TOT:~L BUDv~ i ACTUAL BUDS i BUDGE'T FIXED COSTS ~ 512,832.00 i`';'I' $12,832.00 ' 512,832.00 5153,982.00 VARIABLE COSTS ~ i:~:>:;; ~ 11200 SEASONAL SALARIES 519,282.00 $38,167.53 i`:,;' .54,285.00 5214,243.00 12000 OVERTPriE 51 4E0.00 58,817.82 ~ - 5324.00 515.223.00 BE~tEFITS ~ 51,696.00 ; 53,602.05 ; ; 5352.00 S17,636.00 18100 SKI PASSES I 0.00 s~. 50.00 50.00 ~ 510 850.00 f ' ?'s' ~ n I` ~ 'sly'` `i~'s~` ..110.. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5106.00 5229.82 i':;. 524.00 I'i`~~`~(~ ~ 51,177.00 I I 22200 FOOD 557.00 524.60 $13.00 5630.00 0 T Sc UNIFOR.1bIS 0.00 . .00 ~ 0. 1 0 2..50 CLO HIYi G $ 50 5 00 $ 280.0 ' I 90 O OP G S 00 6 22 0 THER ERATIN UPPLIES 5207. 5 81.37 ~ 548 00 ~ 52 299.00 ' ; ~ l: 23110 UNZ.E.~DED FUEL 558.00 52,352.84 ~f .':fi 513.00 5640.00 I i 6 8. 0 ~ ~ 1 1 23120 DIESEL FUEL 54 6 0 7 131.69 5 037.00 ~~i` 55 869.00 . ~i' e ..3130 OIL & LUBRICANTS S817.00 5873.78 4!!! 5137.00 ~6 858.00 , r;;;1;; ..3..00 :I~fOTOR VEHICLE ARTS { 5 2. 5 ,194.3 $ .00 580. ~ f I .,.300 MACHI, ERY BcEQUIPMENT 53,290.00 5 ,139.05 5731.00 5..6,550.00 1 " 23600 REPAIR ~ 1dAINT. SUPPLIES 5507.00 $81.35 5 10.00 ? 5635.00 ' 5, I & 0.~~. 114 1 23700 TIRES TUBES 5985.0 0 .62 ~ ~ 52 9.00 10 940.00 5 5 , V 4 1 00 COQ SUti1AB E TOOLS 8 .00 14 5 8 0 2 1 L $ 2 546. .0 S915.00 i 1 S 8t P 0.00 0 32300 PUBLICATION RE ORTS 5540.00 $0.00 5 2 56 000. 0 N 33700 VERT SL G dt TESTING 60.00 ~ . 93.79 80 00 ~ : 000 00 AD I 2 5 53 5 54 C 36200 OUTSIDE REPAIR OF E UIP. 54 045:00 $651.07 1s? $0.00 158 045.00 38100 TR.~LNINC 50.00 572.00 50.00 564.00 382 0.00 04.40 1 .00 00 PHYSICALS $ 51 $0.00 5 200 39100 8.00 ' 8. .00 MACH ~ EQTJIPREiYT 52,95 $2,95 00 52,958.00 535,496 Ib1ANA ~ .00 ~ 1 00 ` ~1s~ 00.0 0 GE1gNT r~~ 52,917 _ , 52,9 7. 52,917.00 $35,0 TOTAL ~ 550,739.00 ~;:;?1~ $85,275.54 ;ll;~~ $25,235.00 5772,332.00 , OPERA rEt7 BY THE TOWN OF AVON TRANSPCR,1'A TlCN DI VlS/DN ~~F 0i ~ •~R~~ P.O. BOX 1726, AVON, CO 81620 Telephcne 303 G~9 6121 REVENUE COMPARISON 90/91 91/92 WEIIC EVD SL`JGLE RIDE BUS PASS ~ 30/20 TOTAL WEEFC E*!D SLVGi~ BIDE BUS PASS _ 30/:A TOT.V. ll/2/9l 5;.258.00 5683.00 St80.00 52.099.00 11/30/9! 55.079.00 52x7200 S405A0 56.955.C0'71I30190 53.2:5.43. SSd0.C0 5675.00.. 50;330.03 . . ' 5235.00,- ~;'S6,88'~.50 I?itf<r9l'.:-: - S':,~%.C~;'''' ~353:.u64:'?`i:"j `.`'COQ=':~.`r:;'SiC;S90.CC ~121G7JS0.:. S»,.":38.SO:::.:::c',.S:.29C.OC.ai:.`t: -'i. I?/14/9l 510.252.00 5983.00 5x05.00 S1t,o'20A0 ;12!14190 53.-38.00 5800.00 5795.00 59.473.00 l'J21/9l 53.398.00 5606.00 5225.00 59.527.00 't2/2t/90 57,~t.05 5050.00 5570.00 58,461.05 . - ~ 520000 5825.00 S14;8&s.75. 111~t9C. .$;5,494^0 .;~.S1,SFO.AO = 581500 at7,3]9:~ 112123{80 St^.199.75' 01/00:92 ' 52210250 55,280.00 5655.00 S<8.377.50 :01105191 527.02252 53.060.00 5825.00 520,907.52 O1/1119? 518.348.00 51,380.00 51,570.00 521.8.00 '01!12191 516.346.11 5720.00 5135.00 517,200.11 O1/t319° : 51'4+,89800' S871IA0` .5390'OG ' 5:6056:00 I0T%t9F91 513,29985 $16000 5380.00 513;809185 . ; e 01/..:92 ~ 518.880.00 5270.00 5165.00 517.320.00 '01!28!91 513.963.20 590.00 51,31500 Si 5.368.20 0?lOli92 515,823A0 5;,"•.60."v0 51.096.00 520,379.00 ;02102191 573.508.95 52.200.00 51,045.00 516.153.95 02!08/42;'.: ` 513,487 0. ` S3i08QOCt 5340:00 S1T:367.00 102109!91 St 1.;27:00:::. 5890 Oa:, . S2B5,~ 512002.00 0115192 51»,285.00 5870.00 5290.00 SrS.•~S.CC Ev^2/16191 S1a.293.75 S6C.C0 5395.0 S;c,7-8.75 py~_g2 516.988.00 5210 00 5705.00 517.903.00 :02123/91 515.300.22 530 C0 5585.00 515,919.22 . O'J29F4 5' : 517,73300, 52,98000 5325:00' SZt.~i43:vC 103102591- ~ 513.=05:32:..'` 5!,15006 `5405: ST4,980id2 03107:92 519.878.00 50,020.00 5530.00 520,078.00 ;03109191 5;0.033.13 51.370.00 St, 113.00 517,021.13 03/1x92 Sr9.808.00 5625.00 5336.00 520,689.00 :03/16!91 515.767.69 5180.00 5630.00 5t 6,577.69 :03!21 42 518'538.00 S3Q.00 St 72000 :7519,786.00 !09123191, „ -S1C.989A0 - ,;50:06 5605.00= Sit 394.00 03!28!9? 513,935.00 5270.00 5451.00 514,856A0 03130/91 511,003.56 530.00 51,225.00 . 510.298.56 04/04/92 Stt,451.Q0 53.780.00 5270.00 515.481.00 ~04l06/91 59.562.87 5420.00 590.00 510.07237 04Ci 114"' : ' S8 363:00 ' . 52tQA0-. 5756:00. 58 713.OYT 100/13!34 ~ :53:008.30 "SL OG . ,54.500 53.93:90 I Oal8l92 54,828.00 50.00 545.00 50,871.00 104120191 531200 50.00 SO.CO 5312.00 ,'SCYI,_dF~: ~S?.~GLxrF-.,~:s-~~fF4~-~+s22'f,~1"L --=>5~832:~ ~TQTAG ~~S2",rf,~DC`:..:•~yy4~QYyt`.0~';"~=~;SL~,~40g0~:1±~;~5?°9 R2f:00 YE4R TO DATE 53»2.83250 I YE4R TO DATE 5259.921.00 ~_MND TOTS 92 SEASON ENO TOTAL 9t S~ SIYGIr.RIDE S29d,5o250 SINGLE RIDE X03»,503.00 BLS PASS .;~8.Oa200 BUS PASS 514010.00 VA d[:S PASS 50,735.00 VA 8US PASS St 1,220.00 30/20 512,229.00 30!20 511,x08.00 TOTAL 50»2.93250 TOTAL 5271,141.00 1 FA(1V11 1 F 30 OCT08EIL 52.535.00 2a ~ ~ YOVE~F~t 52,134.30 26 L DEatBE.Y S5, 788.00 2a ~ I JAYi;ARY 50,194,25 22 ~ I I [•~BRIJARY 58.297.50 20 ~tARCrl 52.38275 ' ° _ ~ ! AP.4II. 55.027.50 ~ ' a - ~41Y ~ JUVE to i ~ JULY a r- ~ ~ I .+.I;GtiST al ~ ! SEPT'e~ER LEaDVILLETOT:U 531.2a5A0 ~ ~ I 1 23 i 12/2 r 0, i0a I 01/18 i 02/01 I 02/15 I 02/_'~ GRAyDTOTAL 0'37x,077.50 ~ ,a c,, 2a oz/^e oz. .no _ _ 9C-9 OPERATED ~Y THE TOWN OFAVON TRANSPORTATION DlV1SlCN m~ n -,F'P s LEADVII,LE SERVICE DATES 411/92 THROUGH • 4/30/92 1202 DATE AOI FARES TICKETS A02 FARES TICKETS A03 FARES TICKET'S P04 FARES TICIQ:TS POS FARES TIQ~I'5 P06 FARL•S T1C1~fS TOTAL f ;>iilf `tliei O4/0 /92 ::i:i::.: 3b.25 0 3 $6.Z5 ..9::: 7 i>,;-! "=8~ $0.00 8 10 $0.00 10 i ` '''s:16'i:` $0.00 15 6'' $0.00 5 ; -!!•:.3~: , $0.0 04/02/92 + 13 ~ 38.50 11 i g;! $0.00 9 . 8 $0.50 0 417 ! $11.75 13 . 3 . $0.00 3 I ~ ~ ~I $0.00 5 $24.75 04/03!92 6 ; $3.26 5 g;:9~i. $0.00 9 ld:' $9.75 13 Y6:,' $0.00 16 ; ; 4; $3,26 3 + -l f $0.00 1 $16.26 04104!92 ~1 S>3.25 10 ~4` $3.25 13 9: $6.50 7 ~1,3i': $0.00 13 6: $0.00 6 5 I $5.26 3 $18.25 04/OS/92 B $0.00 9 ~ 9 . $3.25 8 ' 13 , $3.25 10 1tl;` $0.00 10 T. $0,00 7 ~~~bil $2.00 4 $8.50 ! 04/06/92 a€`iif ' g' 30.00 9 ,r '~d. 50.00 10 1.2, ,53.25 11 2;1° $10.50 17 3 $0.00 3'I iily ~i~ 5,0.00 3 $13.75 t I ` ~i~Il Odl07/92 I '.,gig i $3.26 6 1 ai1~ $0.60 12 0 $3.25 6 13i: $4.00 11 7 - $0,00 7 , ~ $0.00 4 $17.00 a , ~ ~ i 04/08192 ~ ~ 1,1 U ~ i~'~!!l ~ 53.25 8 r I ~ fi ',lip jl' $0.00 10 0 $0.00 0 i 11.6 ~ I $3.26 14 • i ~j i $0.00 2 ~4 ~Iy~ ih'Z~(II $0.00 2 50.50 04/09/92 L(:, t 8(,! $3.25 7 r-,,10i; $0.00 10 9 ; $3.25 8 d:! $0.00 4 16 ~ 52.00 14 ! ~ ~ 50.00 4 $8.60 / / 2 5 ;i~;.'::r ':ill.f:.rll~y $0.50 0 $9.76 04 l0 9 B ! 33.2 7 s,9;, $0.00 9 10: $0.00 10 13: $0.00 13 3 30,00 3 y , ~ 04/11/92 .8; $0.00 8 ~ ^::g. $6.60 3 7,.; $0.00 7 1a• $0.00 10 2.;; $0,00 2 I 3,.: $0.00 3 $0.50 04/12/92 1d ; $0.00 10 ;:",'!,.t; ~ $3,25 4 i5 : $9.75 12 ]D-': $0.00 10 . ' ~ , $0,00 2 5 $0.00 5 $13.00 P ; 04/13/92 H , 50.00 8 1.2" $0.00 12 ' 4:; $0.00 4 ;i=9:? $0.00 9 3,? $0,00 3 f' ~ $2.00 4 $2.00 , OQ/ 14192 ~ ~ : ~-p' $8.50 8 ri, 19?,' 315.00 11 'Z . 36.50 0 ~ $0.00 3 $28.00 ' 7 ` 30.00 7 5 : 30.00 5 S6 50 $ .00 2 0 r $3 1 04J15/92 7 $0.00 7 7 $0.00 7 ; tS , $0.00 8 10 . $3.26 9 2 ,25 2 04/ 16/92 - , 6 52.00 4 G , $0,00 5 ~'1 $6.60 0 53.26 8 1 $0.00 1 'J' ` $3.25 2 $ t 5.00 4/ ! 4'; ?I 53.26 1 $13.00 0 17 92 : `ii''Zi $0.00 7 Si€ `'''Iil6i' 0.00 5 "`ii':.1:G ` $9 76 1 _ ~l':e .00 10 i`!i'O:z 50.00 0 2 $ 7 ,....1 50 , 04/18/92 ~'~ti+;:..1:0:: $0.00 10''''i"i.'I;Itlli: 30,00 Gr ;;1,2+, 38.50 10 !'i"i.i.';: 30.00 11 "i'`!'5;. 30,00 5'. :'';!'::.':Z:~; $0.00 2 58,50 t r $ 00 04 19 6.. .0 S i:ii:~':''!i~';: 15 s?'i:s'3`:~ 50 0 3 'i`.'ii:''tyi'I 00 1 3. .,r. ~ 7. $0.00 7 ~ 18... $13.00 14 r uy6~+ $0.00 ~ .0 i 04/20/92 i; 'ia , $6.60 11 ' ii ! i..,,;?~,,;; $0.00 7 i $6.50 ~c. ~.i:: Ft::li!'::' ^.S 5 $9 / /9 .7 2 2 0 0 04 I u: ~ .0 1 1 .i 5 0. 2i `b~ 9.75 04/22/92 ' .'i 1di ( $16.00 9 ~ + lad " ,521.50 5 ' I s i i~ 537.50 I !i 04/23/92 ' i t'i~ , $12.76 15 i i°. 11~ ~ $3.50 12 { , , , ; ~ $18.25 04/2d/92 ~1 ' , jti+" $10.75 11 ' 1, ' ' : I t•n , i I, ~i ~ • .114i I~ II I ~ 1 ,I '~~1tI"j $0.00 10 I i i I I I $10.76 04/25/92 ' Iy I I i ~ $3.60 8 I~:i:~ $0.00 7 I ' 33.50 04/26/92 I'~' ' ti! $0.00 5 ` I 1 ~7'' $5.25 5 ' ' S ~ (''y' 35.25 I~(, r s f . 1t + y ~ I Iflilll: - I I pE . 04/27/92 ; I°r~ 2U ~ $8.60 18 i i ~ 1 1~. y' 58.60 14 i ly $13.00 04/28/92 ~ ~'3 $15.00 18 1~y1 $9.76 13 $24,75 I . 04/29192 '':r + ~8 I $13.00 14 1b" $11.75 10 i~ $24.75 04(30192 ~ .'1~ $13.00 13 11 ; $6.60 9 .519.60 ,L; i i I yl ra== 3!.iwrs'i{ r=====_= a=s== ,I? wr..i!1 ====r= ..==r=va'ar ae :aaraaa ae=== ree e._ifi- =a=aaa =re ~~:<r ei si so=== __sr=='rp:u+a' s===rr rr==r=r ar===s. 70TALS ~ O~O, s 5138.75 277 , 1®~ $22.75 154 ; 1 g2 5& 1.25 167 36A. , $125.50 323 '7~. 51 b,00 69 ~ ~I ~ 522.25 52 5403.50 - 'I'OII'AL RIDL•RS AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP ~ AVEFIADE DAILY 1 i;lli 4 A01 ''~"li:' P04 r!iy!I:fi 1 ii1 ;~'lllii MONTII APRIL FARES COLLECTED 5403.60 A01 32d Poo ! 36~ FARES $13.5 ,lit r i,~Ijnti,,~j~lt.., J , I , a ( 'w.. II. ~ it I i1..1+~i: .Il.~jllf ' I I ~ AVEMaE bAILY ~ 35 A02 ~!.,:.."$r: POS hr'i i'4ii`:: DAYS 30 T1CKL'I'S COLL[iCll'.D 1042 A02 s:1A3`t POS 'j j74~~ Tl~.w 5 siiii^I:::.:. i~~';':;.,.,.>:..,... St ~ ~:jf:' ;try :::r: ;,.:.;:p:;I Il:1:i~ ~~R~ ~!i::i:: j:::.,: I: ~y ~ i ili!inlSil iii i_i~i A03 ib'':' P08 ,,.'J., TRIES 134 Tarn!, xIDGRS ;.;1Xj:., A03 ,.:,192. P06 i!il~ z;... p~;':I;,°I;~ 1.1.,:a Ii'i'!"~ :::I '(llla~::nr:: i'i ai!! `j :,I!o : r,: ;~i. a:i :.:1..+~~i;: ;~ia'n:a;:::::!:II I71`~:a:,:rr.~,c~:U . r5r `s 3 ? ~~4~~~~ i ~i ~7't C'~~ Skrp'.- gay ~ . ,ys x rsfi~xy y, -r ~ i' - rs iT y ,a,•, K r- as~,~'~-Z >T jar > n~~. 2 ,'~~".r ~P,, n~' wa rox+s - } - r. ,JF rk'X~-~~5 i1i.,'~~X'FS ti 1si rti ! i.' .7 arl.. tp~k x : : i~a°' t•~~f''~s' 'c..~'J ~r~J~i ttMGAb: fneir~ ~ -'ha'a`i j + ^'"p f W!~'i, iS '''h ,`1s .'g"' . , - ry - C• ~,.i,=.R ~ Y +v. A,. - ' 3 <S-~A' ls•' Y`~rb J""~' ~ bsy .i , ~ af,.,. t ~ ~ ..!;.#:r., .y, a ..~'-'3:.,. ~'~s 6±.`.~,n,~`'Ea.4..4: $?~s~'.'~s'°'( ,.,,a " ¦ r. s ' rr, Y s. s xF+' ~ y ,S -y r r t j ~ '4 F- ~.4 ti7 r ..4y 5-.#' c •~t ~~.-..C',n=#~{~y.-a . ~ 'S LL , 'wy;~''` t y~#~~~~ --,s' y t. s. ~ ^..s .a. „ i i..~`` ~A Y~ry N ~ 46 ~.3r ~'Zi ~ ~ '~'a. ~5 ~ ~,t~. ~3~.7-SJ1't""4 J L t2'}/ms's. 3 i-~l b.Y .rY~- ~~catf~ ~#ft ~ i~`.3"~~~~ u .tip '9$~ f` 7'2Y~.r.-.... } - s 4 ~ ~ Ord ~ 3- ~ ~'~r~~ 3~,~~+ ~sa~ - ~ ,k~ q. r r ~ c.. r t~-..ca t a a w,. ~ e ti ~ rj - I* i - i > - s J :ice .r... . ; rE ,t;, - . ~ ss ~ A, I. L '.£xplorrag today s ReaU6es cam,; a ~,~r •,x ' ~ • ""~'s ~ ~ ~ r.R ! ?a J.~ar. x'1~- s ^ .tea: J a. ~'zb~.JR"..sy +v~' ..x~ s~ ~ ~ 4a, r }'3a..:F ..-9t i. yY~'z y_ y+sy ,,tom F~~X. s c: s ~ ~,.d `"i r ~ i .~igy ~.t ~ J14~ ~t °~~'t' `.f~` 2 -t" u: . t. s r - ! is . -~s+'L a s ? ; a - y~~ , ~ ~ r'.a r f.. vi'~ ~ y a~ s~ ~ a`s r r ;'~yy ss~~, t t,s ~ .rz X~ R- ~ r ~~a - t ~.,.t. ~ ~.qg 5t<';k:4 Y y'J ~F iy ^r r ? r~'1~ ; _ n 6.. ' e ~ na.Y s} " ~':tia ..t ,.z 9 t,~. ~ ,;x S- r}`~y'~~'~a~~ 1 ~ - } -tt - ~ x ~ y~" a t~~ 4 i ~.t2` .;,r ' E ^ s 4-s s ~uX ~ °"•.fs`~.:i^£~ a~ ~ , q .fi F tik'+, # Y r' ~.b s„ ti~s+ i ~Y hit .,tJ ~ ~ ~~wv" t'.ra,. xa '3 3. '~Y'cfa'' ~ s~ t:+sj r~.r~~r~ Jr :r r7 r s:=-•.J~ "{z +,::_S". ~l i..° .f p-$~ .S F., } ~r r~ t~~r'4~h 5.. i~~fs'aar. >~~+'frr '~U r+{. ~S`J'~sf ~S7 ~'>'n t,, t±C r 1 it r F 7{ tN.H t ~ s .s.i \.r"r ~ ,y1 a' r ~'t ' i .iw ~ ~X r: ' .ar-. S- rr ~ ~ t a t `v ' j °3t 7 .~-~iC~ ~rs ,.t } . fit! t'(~,,n fk~yv -`Y~ Hr vas' ~rae ~-t F;'G ~a~ --'.`..~y~t~~£r'~L "F~^"rt-~~.`f~./.. - . _ er-~~~~'_ fit. ~ ~ S.?~"^_ ' ~1~"~a^. qq ! t~'.; . _ • May 20, 1992 .~s- ~.F 4 - ~~~L ~,~i c W'i~ r•~'. . - .•.iE F.t ~ . - - B®B SAI~~F®RI) ~~g - Cana¢lian T®u>Irls><n Consultant . y :}i, :y-2h'~].'. - U4• • ~.ys r't ' f; ` • Presenting ~dr. _ ir' ; ~,~s> - r... - - _ Mountain Gloom & Mountain Glory - '='~'a` The Aesthetics of Mountain Communities ::r:;.;~' . - •x:-: ' t: - _ Lion Square Lodge . " ;i;". Breakfast at 730 A.M. Program ar 8:00 A.M. - Cost is $12 per person v ' - - Reservations necessary: Call 476-0954 ~"~.~'r:r _ The Symposium Breakfast Series t is organized fa• and open to the public ~ <tS'~" - ~j`- _ 1 _ I Sqk ' ~a~, srt F c - 0. ~ - P L{ } ~ ' vs . x +,t , y -~~t~.~ d....~~~~r!~~~ w'r eay •X t . ~ ~ •:lr - _ _ ^f.:.. r :c..^-G'•~" f ":`_ki'm2r . s?h. x,-tl~.. •,e - is ~F ~ ~ ~ rte- - ~ ~ r?, ~ ..a_-_,,... -~..::.e~ -w,y .._..1~'`:~e_t.~.,::~_ v, _ °.m-":::i W ~r~ •::s~.~~. .~..v:::....,.._ P-f s,.~L<...:__e._.::}~.sr~:~ rfx:.vrri~v_ ~s;.~-~f , Z 3 a'r`tar*4~` - - °t A`''' RECEIVED MAY 9 3 9992 u` ~ d Q°%~a8° , 1891 - 1991 OFFICE OF MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL 1470 South Havana Street • Aurora, Colorado 80012 303/695-7015 May 8, 1992 Mayor and City Council City of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Osterfoss and City Council Members: I wanted to take a few moments to applaud Ms. Pam Brandmeyer for the enthusiastic job she does for you. On very short notice and most graciously she has assisted me in~ coordinating a dinner between Aurora and Vail City Councils. Speaking as one who is experienced in this position, the demands are high - and well met by Ms. Brandmeyer. Her poise and helpfulness speak well for Vail and your staff. I also spoke with Martha (but was remiss in acquiring her last name). Our encounter was fleeting, yet she was as helpful as her cohort. I am extremely impressed with your staff and felt you should know they reflect favorably on Vail. I look forward to meeting you June 5th at our dinner. Sincerelyn, Diane M. Lehman Executive Assistant /dml ~ d nA C~~oraa~ PAUL E. TRUER Mayor 1470 South Havana Street Aurora, Colorado 80012 303-695-7015 April 27, 1992 Mayor and City Council City of Vail, 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mayor Osterfoss and City Council Members: The Aurora City Council is planning a weekend workshop in Vail on June 5 through June 7, 1992. We would like to take this opportunity to invite the Vail City Council, along with the County Commissioners, to join us as our guests for cocktails .and dinner on Friday, June 5, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. at the Tyrolean Inn in Vail. Your City Manager and City Attorney are also welcome to attend. Please respond to Diane Lehman, Council's Executive Assistant, at 695- 7015, to let us know if you can join us. We will look forward to meeting in your wonderful city and, hopefully, talking with you over dinner. Sincerely, ~j~C..~ 5/13/92 Paul E. Tauer Mayor It is my understanding the following PET/dl will be attending. Please let me know if anyone else can go: cc: Stephanie Takis Council Member At-Large Merv (1) Workshop Liaison Tom (1) - - - - - - - - Peg - maybe Ron (1) Ql'~~ U..~ ,I Thanks! pab . J V FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: RECEIVED MAY 1 2 199'zCe~ rsay 7, 1992 Vail Associates, Inc. Media Contacts: Posi Office Box 7 Vail, Colorado 81653 Pat Peeples (303) 845-5722 (303) 476-5601-Vail Mlke Shim-KOmS 303 $45-5721 (303) 949-5750-BcavcrGcek©Rcsorc ( ) (303) 949-2315-F.A~ NEW BACK Bl_)i7VI, T,IFr. TWO ELK EXPANSION AND .SNOWMAKING MEAD LIST OF $Slh MILLION IN TM~RnVEMEN't'S FOI2 VAIL'S 30TH ANNIVERSARY' VAIL, Colo.--Next season, skiers will see a triple chairlift in the Back Bowls, two surface lifts in China Bowl, a children's surface lift at Golden Peak and a 200-seat expansion at Two Elk Restaurant as Vail celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. A fleet of 26 new. snowcats and an extensive snowmaking system on Beaver Creek's Grouse Mountain round out the list of $S'h million in improvements. on Vail and Beaver Creek mountains. The Sun Up triple chairlift and three surface lifts--the West Wall lift, the Wapiti tow and the Golden Peak tow--will be added to Vail's lineup of 20 lifts, which include seven high- speed quads. Designed to utilize terrain in the Sun Up, Tea Cup and China Bowl areas, the Sun Up lift will transport skiers from Yonder in Sun Up Bowl to Jade Glade in China Bowl, accessing an additional 120 acres of skiing. From there, skiers may hop on the West Wall lift, a two-way surface lift allowing skiers to access Two Elk Restaurant or Tea C`~p .Bowl. The .second surface lift, the Wapiti tow, will bring skiers from Upper West Poppy Fields to Two Elk Restaurant. Wapiti (Wah-pa-tee) is the American Indian name for elk. A 200-seat expansion on the southeast facade at Two Elk Restaurant complements the refinements on Vail Mountain. Completed during the 1991 summer after atwo-year corstrsction process, the 500-seat restaurant was so successful during its inaugural winter that the additional 200 seats will be constructed this summer. "Seven years ago, Vail was in need of major improvements ranging from high-speed chairlifts and snowmaking to mountain restaurants and hospitality," said George Gillett, president of Vail Associates. "We've reached those goals and now our focus is on enhancing Vail and Beaver Creek with refinements that our guests have told us are essential. Over the next few years, our direction will be on a steady fine-tuning of all of our programs." Gillett also mentioned that Two Elk has heightened the need for refining food service operations. "Our guests have generated a sizable demand with Two Elk which illustrates our need~t~~~~.o,~e~,t~,ate on our other mountain restaurants in the future." R 19ti9 ~voRl_D,ALPINE SKI Cl-i,<~ivtPIONSHIPS ~tt~y„««d ~ ,,~~~,,,~~,,,r~~.,a --more-- ~ Oq V.~IL/BEAVER CREEK REFINEMENTS 2-2-2 The ski company also plans to construct a gladed trail below Snag Park and new trail space to Whiskey Jack, Flap Jack and Northwoods runs on Vail Mountain, adding over 30 acres of new skiable terrain. Another planned refinement is the addition of an extensive snowmaking system on Beaver Creek's Grouse Mountain. The snowmaking system will cover a large portion of Grouse's terrain and will be installed to supplement early season snowfall. The on-mountain capital projects at Vail and Beaver Creek Resort are contingent upon U.S. Forest Service approvals. "The momentum that the mountain and the community have experienced over the past several years wi11_ continue," Gillett .added. "We're not going to let up. In the next five years we're planning on devoting at least $40 million in capital to both mountains." When Gillett took over Vail Associates in 1985 the company embarked on a~mountain improvement plan that included nine high-speed quads, the addition of China Bowl and Grouse Mountain, the development of Two Elk Restaurant, and the $8'h million in refinements for this coming season. These and other capital improvements total $76 million spent since 1985. -30- l~T~w Llrvi~S ADD~~ TO VAIL'S LEGENJ~ARY BASK BOtVI,STM OIL LI r' 1 ~ AI~I)~l~ AT G®LI~EIlT 1'EAKTM • • The addition of four new lifts for the 1992- The West Wall two-way surface lift will provide access to more ski terrain in the 1993 season will create better access and use make it easierfor skiers using the Sun Up lift Golden Peak base area. The 400-foot tow lift, of terrain primarily in Vail's Back Bowls. One to access the Two Elk'"'Restaurant. It will also located west of the Gopher Hill lift base will new triple chair as well as two surface lifts will return skiers from Two Elk Restaurant to the handle approximately 400 skiers per hour. lie added to service the Sun Up Bawl ;Tea Sun Up and Tea Cup Bawls, and the west wall The additional four lifts bring Vail's total Cup Bow1T; and the west wall of China Bowl'"' of China Bowl. The West Wall lift is 1,000 feet number of lifts to 24, with a total uphill capac- One handle tow lift will be placed near long and can handle 900 skiers per hour ity of 39,920 skiers per hour. Golden Peak to accommodate be inner skiers. in either direction. g All mountain improvements are subject to United States Forest Service The Sun Up triple chair lift will provide better The Wapiti~~ tow lift will provide easier appr°vals and regnla"ons. *Wapiti means elk. ®TM and the~words "Beaver Creek" are registered trademarks of Vail access to. the runs on the east wall of Sun Up access to Two Elk Restaurant from the Orient Associates,lnc. Bowl as well as the China and Tea Cup Bowls. Express Lift. The 850-foot Wapiti tow will The 4;100 foot-long triple chair will climb handle 900 skiers per hour. ~ 1,110 vertical feet and increase uphill capacity The Golden Peak tow lift will give beginner ~I by 1,400 skiers pet- hour. skiers and ski school students another lift and ' {~y{, 'r fl r,'Y+r~' .1}• ~ fdbi tj ~~~N. ~~Ti3r~ ¢"~~Y -,ir' L a~{+~iid`~`~,~ P.~;i~iF o+ Y.;d., ~ ~'i~w. '•Cr~#<r?'rs °'5rr 1'~. 'Y? a r~ 4'"~'S4~o '~~t~XN~'R~ft+. r-'. ,4rL 4~'ti~'~'j. 4fr~~:`.~ ~ . a~e•'• r~~~U~~~,'r r~r.,rS', ~ r{ frr ~vE'. ~ . . + ~ - o F ~ ~ ,.:i . * ~ `ff 'r Gfl r ~ r coppn F" I~p.• _ ~ 1 ,Z° ~ r ~Y _ . +r r GUSE MGUNTAIN•~ t "E~x,~`a . qrl ? r'~i a °y"'t,1 3 ~ F 4 + - r 't#,. iyy ~ TgT ~Fd`A%a ¢ i ~ . ~ ~ TWO ELK + , `i ~wt~3d1~,ti ~ 1 I "p t;y y,~ } 1? 1rFY~ ~?ry'y ly'~ i r, ~',r'~~ el~r:!kr ~ a ' ~Y _ RESTAURANT t¢ . ~ M1, ~t ~r` , t~i~ ~,r, . ~ n~~E1t. ~/t ,Y~t .o t~~~•.A~~y;~a ,~......:;;,~~Y ~kK~^ .t~ s / Y ,,a. ~"Yx"`"~ e:,G;.ti ~ Nw, - - its ! r;a , ,i~ r ~ .f ~x -t~ l•=ro~u,t ~A~t.~^-rrtlr ~ ""~„~wW..~..w.,.t•.~~$,~','~L . . ~ . '.MONGOLIA-. .,;~,r i,,V~!'1 ~ 'v U,~~l ~ ~ ~~k~, ~v;;.,`Z, o'",'~k.,~;, N ~ ~t ~ ;~ti su>f; , `I'i~l'lf-'WAY WAPITI ~•..K..;._ . - ti r f~t~~ ',r tr, yJ . t r SURFACE•LIFT ~ ' , ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ SURFACE LIFT TOIN LIFT ~s,•,~,,r,~n ~ y ` J~ s. .h.~ ,r~ ? , It '~''4 - ~ ~ 1~ F ~ - a pit ut-0 err ~'ir,, ~t 9'H;i'. 'f :t SUN UPBBWL ~ r ~W,``, ,rh, ' aw,,~'" -i',r, • + i t r" Y l „ Itl ' ` h "r'vu ~ I^~ r~ ` ,~SQ ?s~ ' t, re ~,t SUN UP CHIWA BOWl:1/(?'U~+ k'F K"h OY i ~.P? r,t' , • .,TRIPLE 4'~d'~dS1°,~ SIBERIA BOWL ! f ~3 . 1 ~ r Nor l '.CHAIR• LIF1'+ yr;'~ ~ ,`fir ~ _r r' r ri,~t+fr•~ '~Y,'la_I ~ ~~'t Syr t~~• d+', i " ® ;i `:SUN DOWIIN BOWL z ~'u+~~~~, ~ • ,~r ff ,~s ~ •°z iEACUP,BDWL M+~,, ri~pr' 1 P B ~4~~I' i i ~,i: ~ ~ r ~\t rn~ r ~ ~ij i, j ~J~ ' `t, ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ e '"1 A~ I = ~ j.u" , j j ~ 'r ~ 1n d ' h(4 `t+' m p © e } .r.~ r` 1,~ • t, r I jj bb. If ' 4 U Ff~ + r ~~jG+'H ~i~' I eK f ~5~.~{y, ~ 1f is Y ~ ! t.j'~e r a W,~~ ~ t-`!-' ~ ',,~i I t 'f ' t a yy ,r .~H 5 ~ ? } ti,;. ~ rt. i~. . +x F,'~~t~Ktr ' ~ ~ y~ .~~'s°'~~ ,,.~'Y5'" ~d~~ tbii.fa~l + t`F ~ f •+ly} - Varl t`loununn f wlrur. + I u red 61 V:nl t + , , rr? u t~f~t`r t\ssoci:nc.,In.,.url,~arrJwuhin+h r _ ~ ~ \e Jr ~.1C~ i ~f Pi t'p~y1""~"+~+~' ,t'' U S \\rhrte 11i,~er Nauanal Purest and arr undrr ~ } ri. 4 _ - ~}t'f~,y.~ ~ k .~.r n~TtSEHV ~5 6 rrlb-k~'rd r, j ~ r permit from the Forest,Srn rcr U.SD A j ~ •2 :~ur tnw ~e' taf' P''~ Nd cl I + i' ~ t fi~"~ a~fkt~~,j_d{ ~t~~+~' l +t ip~~ t~'ytt1,~ r 4 6 t. ,at ' 1 ~W® ELM RES~ 1AU i~;~~,N' ~ + Al ~ ~ " - VAIL 10 ADD ON FOR 1992-1993 SI~I SEASOl\T Due to the popularity of Uail's new mountain- success necessitated the restaurant's expan- top restaurant, Two Elk, a 2,720 square-foot lion. The restaurant has been designed to ~ expansion will be added for the 1992-1993 accommodate the 50 percent increase in ai ski season. The unique restaurant, which was seating capacity. The south wall will be ex- completed for the 1991-1992 ski season, will tended twenty feet to add 136 feet in width undergo an expansion that adds another 200 and 27 feet in depth to the existing restaurant. Y~/Q ~ ~ ~L~ seats to the southeast comer of the existing All interior finishes will be matched to the ex- ~ ~ 1 ~ restaurant. The mountaintop restaurant's fisting decor reflecting the Ute Indian culture. ~f~ ~ ~~1 r ~ ~ mot.: ~ _ , ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~;a ~ - - ve,,..' Div. ~r rr ~ ~ , rr 4 1 _ 1 St~~ ~ kit 1 st., ~ ~ .1y~,. - % ^'~T7~+~'~ 4.t'~34 I r;l~. ~k" r~~., 4R:1~ w. _ _ t.\ ~ i 'w~~4'" ~'Vi - - _ t..y-~ ~ ,'r 'i al - .,-3 ~C+~+a ~ Mrj~I! ~ ~ ~~~~"~fi'~I'~'= • n - ~ i~A' _ !r P `e ,~,i~s''K''~;~~ ~ r . a,'~ tp T ~ - ~ `,gar.: t G,~'~i~ ~V'~ ~ . 6 ~ y _ - - _ 1 ~y ~ Vail Mounuin 6nlines, openicd by VaJ Assw~a~a, ina, j ~ /~4~` e. ~a~~+t -.,,rwL ~ 'S _ f" I ~ $ relxeied within the Whia Rimier Nanonal Forese and / 71 ~ t?~ ~ ~,e ~ are under permit 6om the Faeu Sern<e, U.S D.A. _ ~ are registered trademarks ofVail Associates, Inc. v w w RECE11/ED M~'. a 1992 Holy Cross Wilderness Defense Fund Board of Directors 1 May 19 9 2 Warren M. fiern, M.D. Chairman Dear Friend of the Wilderness: Jack E. Holmes, Ph.D. Vice-Chairman As you may know by now, we have had some good Roger Fuehrer Colorado Mountain Club news and bad news in our fight against East Slope Coordinator Homestake I I . In November, we argued our Marka Moser federal case against the USFS and COE in the West Slope Coordinator Chuck Ogilby 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver; Vail actually, Lori Potter of the Sierra Club Legal Kathy Casper Wilson Defense Fund argued (brilliantly) for us. Colorado Water Conservancy Secretary On November 25, the Eagle County Commissioners Marty Sorenson Sierra Club reaffirmed their decision not to grant a 1041 Treasurer Land Use permit for Homestake II. They were Rev. Don Simonton requested to reconsider by the District Court Vail that rejected most but not all their reasons Doug Byren t for denying the permit. This was a small In Memoriam , quiet, but important victory. The federal permit is useless without the county permit. Advisory Committee Dan Luecke, Ph.D. On Friday, April 3 , without deigning the EnvironmentalDelenseFund courtesy of notifying our counsel, the 10th Robert Gotten, J.D. C1rClllt Court handed down a ruling denying our Boulder Bob Turner appeal. We held a press conference on Monday Regional Director morning denouncing the decision and stating we National Audubon Society Darrell Knuffke WOLIld ask the court to reconsider. Folly may Regional Director be redeemed by pure thoughts . I f the court The Wilderness Society persists in folly, we must consider further Lee Baker appeal to the US Supreme Court . Colorado Environmental Coalition William Bird Mounsey One messa e ~ we must send is that we will use University of the Wilderness g Mark Udall any legal means to prevent construction of the ExecutlveDirector Homestake II project. However, our principal Colorado Outward Bound objective must be to stimulate the citizens of SallyRanney Aurora and Colorado Springs to force American Wilderness Alliance Rosalind McClellan abandonment of this project by their city Environmental Center Director governments . Ultimately, that is the only way University o! Colorado Homestake II will be defeated. We are in the .black but we need your Chief Counsel Frances M. Green, Esq. COntrlbL1t10I1S now to continue the fight . We will seek grant support for community organizing, but meanwhile, you must sustain the effort. PLAN TO COME TO THE 10TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION AT TIGIWON LODGE ON SUNDAY, JUNE 28 FROM 2 TO 8 PM! PLEASE VOLUNTEER TO HELP ORGANIZE THIS IMPORTANT EVENT. For the wilderness, ~\~it~ 1130 Alpine Boulder, Colorado 80304 303/447-1361 ...~,EO„~,.o.xw WEDNESDAY, APRIL t3. 1992 COLORADO DAILY Gr®u t® cha~len a H®mestce II ' i~ p ~ deClsl® By R:E_ BAIRD the wildemess if the Homestake H water If built, the S91 million Iomestake ll streams in the Holy Cross Wilderness. ' ' a`~' stir project is built. project would supply water to the cities of Calling a federal appeals Dour[ decision `°Ilre courts have said that no matter Aurora and Colorado Springs. Although Bern is asking the court to to uphold the Homestake II water project how incompetent the federal agency or its reverse itself, he said that it will probably "incrodbl obtuse " a Boulder-based Don- y In 1990, Weinshienk agreed that the take the election of a new U.S. presidcm Y decisions, the decisions must stand if the , nervation announced Monde that it Y." agencies cnvironmcntal studies on the t~P Y arc made deliberatel said Dr. Warren influence of draining water from the wilder- with a different cnvironmcntal philosophy will ask the court to reconsider its ruling. }lam a Boulder physician and chairman of " to reverse ttre damaging eHccts of the On Friday, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court the board of directors for the wilderness area wero "inaccurate and inadequate. Reagan_Bush era and its court appointees. But she said the previous court rulings of Appeals upheld a bwer court ruling that ~ group. " I1De American people deserve a established a pr+eoalent that federal agen- the permit p.~.,,.,~,,es of the U.S. Forest higher standard of government than that, to "If the people want to protect the envi- cics decisions couldn t be overturned Service and the Army Corps of Engineers say nothing of protocting the environment" unless it was proved they didn't take a ronment, They will have to change the way to oonstnrct were not arbitrary and Capri- Both federal agencies deny that the pro- "hard look" at the evidence. they vote for President," he said. a~• ject will Gave any noticeable effect on wet- In November, the Holy Caress lands in the wilderness. Some scientists Gave determ that The project remains dormant, however, Wilderness Defense F~~ challenged the '?'he Holy Cross Wilderness spans five We project, which aoeording to Hern bould because the Eagle County Commissioners ruling handed dawn by U.S. District Court glaciatod valleys south of Vail and lies eventually cost $250 to s3~ million, would Gave refused to issue permits necessary for Judge tits Weinahienk, asking the appeals beneath the Holy (dross range. named fora remove 9S percent of the water from its construction. court to overturn Wienshienk's ruling geobgic featuae that appears as a large because the federal agencies overlookod ~ ~ s~ .and is visibb fry miles away when possible damage to 240 acres of wetland in filled with snow. Rocky Mountain News Tues., Apnl 7, 1992 Tuesday, April 7, 1992 ~'}~E DENVER POET ~ T~tE ~'VE~T ¦ W A ER A PEAL - An envi- ronmental ou terda said It Foes ®f H®ly Cr®ss water pr®ject t®fi~ht ruling would ask ~eder~l appeals ~ourt to reconsider a ruling in the Homestake By Gary G_erha_rdt strata the prglect were not arbi- Vail and deliver tl?e water to Auro- ~I yvater project.' N~~,•kv lrfuu„roiir N~~~ s Sraf~ tVr;;~r Crary and capricious. ra and Colorado Springs. "The appeals court here has defied "We will ask the 10th Circuit F nvironnrentalists and Western not only the law and logic - it has ig- A preservation group will ask a Court to reconsider its incredibly Slope leaders oppose it, saying it noted the laws of gravity and other federal appeals court to reconsider obtuse opinion," said Warren would take ~J5'%u of tlTe water from basic physical facts," said Warren its ruling that government agen- Hern, chairman of the Holy Cross the wilderness area and cause irre- Hern, chairman of the Holy Cross Wil- ~~ies didn't break the law in issuin derness Defense Fund. B Wilderness Defense Fund. versible damage to the ecosystem. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Ap- permits for the Homestake ll wa- Hern's group maintains the fed- froth federal agencies deny it peals on Friday affirmed a court rul- terproject' eral ~ envies violated the federal will have an ~ a g that the Army Corps of Engineers g ~ ppreciable effect on in On Friday, the 10th U.S. Circuit Lands Management Policy Act, wetiairds in the Holy Cross area. ~rroperly issued a permit to allow con- l~uurt of Appeals upheld a ruling the National Environmental Policy Even with the federal sanction, struction of the Homestake II water Act, and the Clean Water Act, project. by U ;S. District Judge Zita Wein- however, the project is held up The project would divert water shienk that the permit processes The project i:; designed .to tap because the Eagle County com- from drainages in the Holy Cross Wil- ' of the_ U.S. Forest Service and four mountain streams iri~the' I{oly missioners have refused to issue derness Area to the Homestake Res- Army Corps of Engineers to con- Cross Wilderness area south of the land permits needed, ervoir for use by Aurora and Colorado Springs. Sj ~ .J ? , The Vatl 7YnU -November 29, 1$'9l C®mmissg®ne uph®lel ~-I®meste ply dex~al liy I{AT1E~ HEHCH-IEIt validated 14 of the 20 reasons The Eagle County commis- the commissioners had used as sinners took acourt-ordered a basis for denying the permits. Rocky Mountain News Tues., Nov: 26, 1991 > second look at their Homestake however, Jones also ruled~F~rr"''¢ ' ~ 11 decision Monday and agreed that county could regulate ~~~~3' ~~C~~t®11 ~!~/~!'i11@~ that they still have valid rea- IIomeetake II with regard to sons for denying the project. wetlands irnpecta, aquatic habi- Eagle County commissioners That action will send the is- tat, and pcaseibly nuisance fac- reaffirmed a decision 1Vfonday sue back to Eagle County Die- tore. The judge ordered the denying Aurora and Colorado . trict Court, where a judge will county to reconsider the Springs gland-use permit to eventually decide whether the Elomestake II decision in light develop water resources in 1989 county denial of permits of his ruling. Holy Cross Wilderness Area for the water diversion project Monday's meeting was short near iJail. The re-evaluation was a justifiable action. (about 15 minutes) and to the was ordered by District Judge . The Homestake II project is a point. Thare was no public William Jones in July after a proposal by the cities of Col- comment, .and only a few audi- two-year court figltt over t:ri- • orado Springs and Aurora to ence members. teria usQd to reject the per- divert an average 22,000 acre Commissioner Don Welch mit. The Ilotttestake II Pro- feet of water annually from said the half-dozen reasons that jest has been opposed for a creeks inside the Holy Cross decade by environmentalists Wilderness to the Front Range. were not invalidated by the who fear it will destroy wilder- In 1989, the Eagle County judge wery sufficient to reaf- ness wetlands. Litigants are firm the county's denial of commissioners used their au- Ilomestske II. Gustafson noted awaiting a U.S. 10th Circuit thorny under the state's 1041 that according to the 1041 Court of Appeals ruling on land-use review procedures to regulations, a project may be federal permits. deny permits for the project. denied if uny one criterion is The commissioners listed 20 not met. reasons for denying the permit. The cities appealed that de- The commissioners voted cision to the district court. Last unanimously to reaffirm their July, Eagle District Judge denial of the project, this time William Jones ruled that the using only six reasons. commissioners had over- A formal resolution will be stepped their powers in trying adopted on Dec. 17, and the to regulate a project located on matter will then go back to the . federal lar.<ls. Jones' ruling in- court. RECEIVED MAY ~ 2 1997 X~ ~ i ~ t:Ali I.~/TcR1V~1TIt~'M!-,L HL~SJ:'EY TL?Ur?NFiI~!Fj°JT iSL ddEST Af~E#~Cddd ~Jf?I4,aF ir~IL. GU 9~6~? Pfa~+ ~9~~ T<<sun f t{a i 1 i5 S_ Fr^ontane f?oad Vast, GU 8i~~7 Ede wc-~uI d 1 ske ~,o t:3ke tht s otacaort uns t ~ to ttaa,rr& ~{c3u fcr yctrur acrctson donation fc+r- thss year's Seccrrd Annua; tra;3 Inter^.r>atioa~a3 Hc-rckev Tour•naraent _ hed d ~cs~s 3 .ice - 19. Thanks to your c~erxer-osst=.r, ~+e se+ere ah?e to brsnri tc hail a team from Tver. Russl a arad a tear: fr-c~a ,Ia 1 i,yr ~i''ri rra. ~ 7 a t t ~e h~ y c'= hockey hsstor^y ~+aas rr~rade a= thss Maas t;;e f:~st time t~rat teams from thrase countr~: es !:eve a per ~~,3 vad ataa~: rrst each ~~t1;er i Rr,~a~^sca_ R,rt far^ mt~r~e sm~ortarxt was t~;:e ex~sure of the ~'a3 r;es,e ar?d :~d~.~s.ssans to ~rtter~i ca and the i rst e~^act i o~~s ~f e ur forms : t es t.'~ the~~a_ ~anv r~elatsc+nshirrG and stroru e;s~ar~ts~~s~ra~ tses a~erQ rsade dura~u the hr 3~f taro a?eeks that tt:e±f sver•e tvver^e- ~t total ~-rf se•>eY;teen tearrrs ~a^t c; ~at`ed. 7"earyas e~rer^e f;^~ryt ~a1'~:ar~y and Hobhema. Canada, .CaI i forma. sconsa r:, Lltan, I?hode Is1 and, Gol t~r~ado SCr nos, z'7en•~ar an,,s 'L'3i 1. Ttze tournar~ren~, corm r}~t at t!-re end o f the seas~a^.~. rues a C,e~ref3 t t cr 3.rai I , and cur cart ~ c3 .cants were i mr?ressed sus th the as:aena ±s es that ;,has I feed t~ offer. This tournament srcas a great sar~cess~ aid sue thank sou for your coatrsbuts~zn. Wsth much aonre~iatsorr, ~ ' ~~y Vasl International Tourr~ament Silent Auction Committee trail Junsor Hctclre~ Cl uh Tax # SI~~aS?~~ - -v w way . JJ ' Al~i~r~ RAG IUcC~ M,`~"~' ° ~ 992 G~~rlc~t May 12, 1992 Mr. Mike Rose Transportation Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road - Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mike: We borrowed a Town of Vail bus on Tuesday to take news photos of Red Sandstone School students and their pictures which are to be used as advertising for the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens on the buses this summer. Tony Cordova was very helpful in arranging this for us. You originally directed me to Rick Mueller, who handles the advertising for the buses. He did a wonderful job for us! It has taken extra production time on his part to enable us to use the pictures in the buses. He not only gave us a nonprofit rate for the summer but has included the Beaver Creek Buses as well. This project has been a good example of community cooperation in the Town, and we appreciate the part that the Transportation Department has played. Sincerely, Helen S.~Fritch President of the Board HSF:dyb cc: Ron Phillips 183 GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 303-476-0103 u ~y TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2105 /FAX 303-479-21$7 May 15, 1992 Mr. Ed Grange, General Manager Holy Cross Electric Association P.O. Box 254 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Dear Ed: It has been some time since we have talked concerning the parcel of land in Vail on the South Frontage Road the Town has wanted to buy for quite a while. Over a year ago you sent us a check returning the deposit we had. made when the contract was signed. I have held that check without depositing it with the hope that, as the Colorado Ute situation was worked out, the Holy Cross Electric Association Board of Directors would once again consider selling this piece of land to the Town of Vail under the same terms and conditions we had agreed to before. Please discuss this issue with your Board and let me know if there is any interest in proceeding at this time. The Vail Town Council feels this land parcel is very important to . . the future of the T~ W government, and we would appreciate the opportunity to try to complete this transaction. Thank you for your consideration. Sincer , Rondall V. Phillips Town Manager RVP/dd xc: David Sage, Chairman of the Board, Holy Cross Electric Association Vail Town Council , Lawrence A. Eskwith 1~ TOWN OF vA1L ~ 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Town Manager Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2105 /FAX 303-479-2157 May 15, 1992 Mr. Robert Mosten, District Engineer Colorado Department of Transportation P.O. Box 2107 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502-2107 Dear Bob: Thank you so much for getting the highway painting crews to this end of the District so early in the Spring. They have completed the painting of 170, the Frontage Roads, and the State Highways in this area, and it is such a help to have it done before Memorial Day weekend. We appreciate your help in having this important work accomplished so early and ask you to pass on our thanks to the other members of your staff who had a part in this as well. The design work on the Dowd Junction Bike Path is proceeding well with no hitches to this point. Thanks again for your help and cooperation on that project, too. Sinc el , Rondall V. Phillips Town Manager . RVP/dd xc: Vail Town Council Ken Hughey Greg Hall r . ~:~~!i..1$yl •I ~l i • r r • . • r . - ,I yv„ ~ • • i .l .1,?r>.? >~•'>A.?•~?.^.1 ~i ~A"1 . r ~1:. I•r'r v ? . r r r ? . 1•.r . e r ~,•I ••/•••l•?'I ? ? / 1`r ••`••i•?rf t?•?•?•1•? 1 •.r • ? , ?!1 ? 1•••i•? ? i 1. RAISING THE ROOF ~D'f~ CDM1`~.d~U, - ~y~ • Chamberlain added. He said "Here's where we need to ex- Glenwood Canyon, with its inter- excise our imaginations instead , ~ , r~~~,~~ state highway, trails, kayak of our lawyers," Macdonald - ramps, picnic and rest areas, is a urged. Each state must have an perfect example of the act's of#icial responsible for admitris goals, focusing on enhancement tering the program,'and each .=Colorado Trails .plays stresses importance of frontier mutes to our ft[tt[iZ° ~ of public transportation. must establish a trail advisory . Stuart Macdonald, Colorado ~ board. , / ~ PHIS WEEKEND'S Cola ; ' ~ make significant contributions to Division of Parks and Outdoor He conceded there was no pro- redo Trails Days is our the economy of individual com- Recreation state trails coordina- , tection of the lottery dollars for newest celebration, with J. munities and'the state. Their o- tor, noted that this is.the first trails when the Symms Act goes a variety of lively - tential is recoggi7.edip the In er- federal bill specifically to fund into effect, but said he hopes the events at Heritage Square in J®/5~11~! ~ ' moaai ,urface Transportation trails. The state has spent more public will demand that the leg- Golden scheduled from noon to 5 ~RM~R ~ `Efficiency Act of 1991 -known than $4 million on trails since islature not raid the funds again,,- today: ~A preview of National as the worms Act for Sen. Steve 1974, of which $3.2 million came since many voters thought ALL Trails Days June 5, it's a ' ` Symons (R-Idahol, who carried from Colorado lottery dollars, , • lottery proceeds were for parks thoughtful acknowledgment of ~ ~ the bill -which creates a new and many local communities and recreation and have been in- the intrinsic role these paths National Recreational Trails spend their own lottery allot- tensed that they're being used have:played since the'nation's ygil, illon, Steamboat; every- Fwd. The focus is to integrate ments on trails, too, with 60 ~ ;for prisons and other purposes. beginning, - ~ where. They're recreation and transportation with other impor= . communities now working on r We've some great options rant commumt corridors or streamside trails. When a „r: r...try is young "and commuting trails. y g°als' The NRT funds will be distribut- ahead, with the potential to cre- . its unknown Lands are being ex= Colorado has 11,000 milesbf The act -which still must re- • ' ed 30 percent each for motorized ate a transportation ..~r~..:ence . . plor~d;.trails:are the lifeline to backcountry trails, more than ~ . ceive budget approval from Con- and nonmotorized trails, and 40 that is more than just adequate. civilization..As the countryside 8,000 of which are in our seven gress -provides for the trans- • percent for innovative corridors. Joanne Ditmer evrites about fills'up and people crowd into ; national forests. There are 17 fer of federal gasoline taxes paid or projects which benefit most ~ `historic pr~eservatioa gad envi- the cities, trails.once again be- National Recreation Trails, to on nonhighway recreation fuel users ronmental issues. come essential so people can get taling 145 miles. The Continental used in off-highway vehicles • ' awagfrom civilization, back to Divide National Scenic Trail (snowmobiles, off-highway mo- . = " - ~ ~ nature and the healing therapy from Mexico to Canada will i'un torcycles, etc.) and in backcoun- ~ ~ _ • of solitude... ~ for 3,100 miles, with 600 miles try camping into the new fund I ' - ~ • Trails in ttie backcountry have already built in Colorado and for trails improvement and i 1 ~ N~~® ~o F'~~ long been popular, but they serve work on the remaining 232 miles maintenance. The amount can- ~ WE SPECIALIZE IN HARD TO FIT- primarily the young or fit. For starting this summer. ' not exceed $30 million psi year ~ N SIZES 2 TO 13~:]~A,°,A~AAA TO EE the past 20 years the velo The 469-mile-long Colorado throughout fiscal years 1992-97.' ~ J jx~ ment or trans through and at the Trail, built entirely by volun- The new National Recreation- ~f; " \ All leacher: ' cage of the city nas given a new teens, goes from southwestof al Trails program marks the end a where, eons, recreatXOnai opporiumiy o 1-' Denver at Waterton Canyon to of the 35-year interstate high- - Nagy, Red, ~r. eons morg_ those wno don't have Durango, crossing sis wilderness way era, with the interstafe sys- • ~ ~ ~ Gray; Taupe, Block the"time•or the energy to o to' 'areas, five major river systems tem now 97 percent complete, . -b~siant[ na~th-wars out sti want and penetrating eight mountain said Ray Chamberlain, head of ® . away from the "madding ~ ranges. Despite the terrain, - the Colorado Department of _crsi~d's ignoble strife.'" . ~ there are plenty of places that • Transportation in.explaining the ~ ~ ~ . Starting in 1974 with Denver's provide easy access for day act to Colorado Outdoor Recce- ~~~1'l~ - ti~ad~ m us.A.: South Platte Greenway - 30 hikes. It is the only major east- ational Resource Project mem- _ r~j~ miles of trans throw h 400 acres west trail in the state. The na- hers. That group is made up of ® A ®!f ~ of ark -Coloradocomtnuni- tion's first coast-to-coast trail,. managers of federal and state ~o /@~~o I® RBTAIL 7 p the 4 920-mile American Discov- ublic land mane ens and recce- cusr°"' °'aPe"es Bedspreads ~ ~~6 ties have woven a network of s p g Reupholstery, slipcovers trails from the heart of town t0 cry Trail, will cross 13 states, ational and tourism officials. Waverly sfartfn~g Af 5.99jyd. 2482 So. Colo. Blvd. pe ~ with a roximatel 800 miles In :The tential of the bill absolute- Mon. - Fr , 9-5:30 o n lands outside beside rivers PP y Po sat. 9;30-s:oo sun rso-a 75~,.i~~ and into mountains. We have ~ Colorado. ly fascinated the listeners. ssso E. Evans near Ho1yr ~ Open oa~ly 9-6 • Closed Sunday. ' about 600 miles of such urban Trails. are not just for mental "The interstate highway trans- 768~~056625 ~ trails; of which 460 are in the " health or physical exercise, al- formed American society and " - - - metro Denver area, but they're though those are valuable na- .commerce, but it does not meet ~ : , ~ ~ • -'Go in Grand Junction, Aspen, tional priorities, but they also the needs of the nest 20 years," ~ " r ' ' - r _ - w; , ~ i_~ sue.-;,,-....sue _k s ~ ~~~E~d`~~' e',':`~ ~ 8 9992 ' ~ ROY ROMER r~kf~ nr,~e~n: LIC ~ ~ - Main Building, Denver =r. GOVernOF (303) 322-9076 ~ Ptarmigan Place, Denver PATRICIA A. NOLAN, MD, MPH (303) 320-1529 Executive Director T:trst National Bank Building, Denver (303) 355.6559 Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division Grand Junction Office ~ 4210 East 11th Avenue (303) 248-7198 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 Puebb Office DEPARTMENT (303) 331830 /FAX (303) 331-4401 (719) 543-8441 OF~HEALTH MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties 1 FROM: Dick Parachini,~Eagle Mine Project Manager ' : ~ DATE: May 13, 1992 SUBJECT: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -April 1992 (EAG 7.1.6.3) The following is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program during the April 1992 winter shutdown season. The airborne particulate data collected by the Paramount air monitors shown in the accompanying table are preliminary in nature. This means that the Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) values may be revised after auditing and validation by the air contractor and the State. The information 'is useful in assessing emissions during the winter shutdown period, as well as trends in potential human exposure. The monitoring frequency during the winter shutdown period continues on the one-in-six day program. Metals analysis is temporarily suspended until startup of construction activities in the spring. Both of these changes are allowed by the Remedial Action Plan and have been implemented in past winter shutdown periods. The concentrations for TSP were not above the air emissions permit levels during the March monitoring period. The notation ug/m3 stands for micrograms per cubic meter. A microgram equals one millionth (1/1,000,000) of a gram. Site activities in April were associated with collection and transfer of trine seepage and other contaminated water to the Consolidated Tailings Pile. The water treatment plant has continued to treat this water and discharge it to the Eagle River. Sludge generated from the treatment plant continues to be deposited on top of the Consolidate Tailings Pile. Modifications to the piping into the treatment plant were also continued in April. For additional information,, please contact Dick Parachini (331-4801) or Marion Galant (331-4855). Attachments DP/dp . ~n a~ <<, ~ 9 8 ~~992 RECEI~,P~~ . r DAl~iES & MOORS • AFFILIATED NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 1125 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO 80202-2027 (303) 294-9100 FAX: (303) 299-7901 May 11; 1992 Mr. Richard Parachini _ Colorado Department of Health Eagle Mine Project 4210 Fast 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 Dear Dick: Enclosed are three copies of the April 1992 Airborne Particulate Concentrations Report for the Eagle Mine site. We would emphasize the provisional nature of the data and the fact that revisions may be made after auditing and validation. Sincerely, DAMES & MOORS rr~ Brian Kiernan Project Manager BK/alb cc: Howard Roitman, Remedial Programs, CDH . Douglas Ikenberry Bob Winn Bob Neukirchner • Dave Warren . . ~ : . - - Barbara Lewis Daryl Longwell ~ ~ . . ~.t RAGE: b'~.~ ~'1~Y 1 8 1992 AIRBORNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS EAGLE MINE SITE APRIL 1992 1N9/m') DATE SCHOOL SITE NORTH SITE SAMPLE TSP luo/m3)' TSP lua/m'1' 04/06/92 12.4 15.3 04/12/92 15.0 18.2 04/18/92 8.4 8.6 04/24/92 12.6 16.3 04/30/92 22.5 40.1 ID =Invalid data • Permit limitation is 150 pg/rtt~ These data are provisional and subject to revision after auditing and validation. } R~V~.~AY 1 4 1992 ~ the Learr~in E G~ ;o=, (/pTree9 1 a~ MAUREEN MULROONEY, DIRECTOR _ . ~ ~ _ . ~ ~i~-2-x}2 C..~J ~ . ~ ~ ~ G~ ~~7~~-'1 _ _ . - . - ~ V c~ ~ C~(~ r XC TC ?c~ . ~ • -s ~ VERNANCE a~ RE~IfJNAL GO R(JPt~LITA.N AREA THE DENVER l~I.ET IN _ REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT :..R' '~.RY.y~.. ~ a_ xf. . . _ n.u.... r ~ ~r«a.'. ~ ~ F . ~I . ~ 4'.. . ,.L tpi.r, k a• - oa - YS,.: 's . .t - ~~;p s~°"mx - .a~ , _ - ~ ~ . ~i ~ ~k3 i ..q ~7..r3-''°'.'~` y4 :,;,~;;~s''~~f~.,:~~.- ...~'.:w:xooa~. si.:e~»~"~`r-r ~ ..t ~ 4 F+' 77 N s ` ~ ~tr~i..ri'i- r f "ft ..w 'a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ r y t~ }iw a w.., ~ _ - . i i _ JOHN BUECHNER, CHAIR PRESENTED BY THE ME D ~ EMB R 1991 a- John Buechner, Chairman University of Colorado at Denver Robert Albin ~ Larry Kallenberger - Albin Management Consultants - State Department of Local Affairs The Hon. Bonnie J. Allison ~ The Hon. Linda Morton - Colorado State Senator - City of Lakewood - Richard L. Anderson The Hotz. Homer Page - Aurora Business Center - Boulder County The Hotz. illargaret Carpenter The Hon. Pat Pascoe City of Thornton Colorado State Senator The Hotz. Guillermo A. DeHerrera Federico Pena Colorado State Representative Leoztard M. Perbnutter Joel Edehnan LAP, Inc. - ~Rose Medical Center Richard L: Robinson The Hon. Rich Ferdinandsen - Robinson -Dairy, Inc. Jefferson County James J. Scherer The Hott. Patrick A. Grant U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Colorado State Representative - The Hon. Paul Tauer Thomas T. Grimshaw Ciry of Aurora - - Calkins, Kramer, Grimshaw & Hannng The Hotz. Robert L. Tonsin_ g The Hotz. T.,J. "Ted" Hackworth City of Littleton - City & County of Denver Tl:e Hozt. Wellitzgton E. Webb Bill Hinztnelmann ~ City & County of Denver Denver Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO Ray S. Wells Donald F. Htutt R.S. Wells Corporation - The Denver Post - ~ The Hon. Elsie A. Lacy, Ex-Officio Walter F. Imlzoff City of Aurora - Hanifen Imhoff, Inc. • J LETTER OF '1'KANSMITTAL December 18, 1991 Elsie A. Lacy Chairman, Board of Directors Denver Regional Council of Governments Dear Chairman Lacy: On behalf of the members of the Metro Forum, I am delighted to forward our report. and recom- mendations to the Denver Regional Council of Governments Board of Directors. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to you and to the Board of Directors for charging us with this difficult and challenging assignment. The charge to the Metro Forum was to take an independent look at the regional governance needs of the Denver metropolitan area, develop a proposal for the future governance of the region which will improve regional decision making and enhance metropolitan cooperation, and estab- lish aprocess to implement the proposal. Our report addresses these issues through a statement of "The Metro Forum's Vision of Regional Governance" and the "Recommendations". Our report presents our findings and concerns, a detailed proposal for strengthening regional institutions, and options for implementing the proposal. Our report calls for a major effort to build broad-based support for implementing the recom- mendations as the next step. Members of the Forum who felt our recommendations did not go far enough expressed concern that any new regional mechanism must consolidate planning and regional services. Further, in creating the agency, most members felt that it was critical to bring local and regional agencies together to identify the services to be provided and the appropriate method to establish the regional agency. Our report identifies those regional services that should be addressed. There was strong support among the members for using the current Regional Service Agency procedures to establish a new agency. Other members felt a legislative approach would be necessary. We all agreed that whatever steps are ultimately necessary will have to be undertaken in a broader public outreach program. We hope the_ Denver Regional Council of Governments will continue to participate and provide leadership for this effort. Again, we would like Co thank you for the opportunity to be involved in this important process. John Buechner Chair, Metro Forum TALE ®F CONTENTS THE METRO FORUM'S VISION OF REGIONAL GOVERNANCE ~ 1 RECOMMENDATIONS ~ 3 INTRODUCTION 5 BACKGROUND ON THE METRO FORUM AND ITS ACTIVITIJES 6 Mission 6 Accomplishments 6 FINDINGS 7 Existing Conditions and Area-Wide Trends 7 Regional Functions and their Key Elements 12 Alternative Regional Governance Approaches 13. Criteria Used to Evaluate and Design a Regional Governance Approach 14 Legislative Considerations 14 CONCLUSIONS 15 APPENDIX 17 - RECOMMENDATIONS The. Metro Forum recommends that: 1- A New Regional Governance Structure Be Established in the, Denver Metropolitan Area. The structure should have the capacity to set regional policy, formulate regional plans, resolve interjurisdictional conflicts, provide services, as appropriate, generate financial resources, and ensure that regional policies MISSION STATEMENT and plans are successfully implemented. The regional services identified for further consideration include water supply, The mission of the Umbrella. Regional transportation, tax equity and regional revenue sharing, health Planning and Service Agency is to care, environment (air and water quality), solid waste, and open create an institutional mechanism space. whereby all residents of the six-county Denver region can participate coopera- tively in providing for the sustainable 2. A NPw Qrga,ni?ation Re Created To Take Responsibility For development and future livability of the Implementing The Necessary Outreach And Legislative Support region. The new agency is the mecha- To Establish The New Regional Structure. The successor entity nism by which public and private sector could be composed of representatives of the Metro Forum, interests and individuals jointly develop policies and plans for addressing issues Ivletro Leadership Caucus, DRCOG, local and state government of regional significance and ensuring officials and a broad base of business and community leaders. that those policies and plans are implemented and enforced by the 3, The Umbrella Regional Planning and Service Agency serve as appropriate agencies. To be fully the Model for Achieving Consensus on important Regional. effective, the new agency will have the ability to provide regional services, as Issues and for Ensuring that Action is Taken to Implement tha; appropriate. Finally, the new agency Consensus and Enforce Compliance. In order to achieve the acts as a catalyst for regional problem mission envisioned by the Metro Forum, provision of selected solving, the center for information on services must be tied into the planning functions. regional issues, and the collective voice on issues affecting the future quality of life in the Denver region. The basic elements of the new agency are contained in the appendix to this report. The agency could be created by a new statute or under an amended version of the Regional Service Authority Statute. The umbrella agency will accomplish the following: ? It will fix authority for enforcing implementation of regional plans in one agency. • ? To the extent that existing regional agencies continue to provide regional services, they will do so within the boundaries of a comprehensive regional framework. ? Interjurisdictional conflict will be resolved at the re- gional level, when appropriate. • ~ ? Regionally significant developments and infrastructure • projects will be evaluated and approved within the regional planning framework. ? It will link our efforts to protect and enhance our environment with transportation and regional planning. 3 INTIZOI~UCTION In August 1990, the Board of Directors of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) created the Metro Forum, a task force of 27 distinguished regional citizens, to develop recommendations to the CHARGE TO THE METRO FORUM Board about the future of DRCOG and its role in the Denver region. The Forum was charged with developing these recommendations in the by the context of an assessment of regional issues and trends and a deterrnina- DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS lion of the functions a regional agency should perform. The recommendations of the Metro Forum provided herein reflect a The (Metro Forum) is created by the vision of future governance based on growing interdependence and Board of Directors of the Denver accountability as a region. The recommendations have the general Regional Council of Governments to consensus of the members of the Metro Forum, although some disagree- develop recommendations to the Board about the future of DRCOG and its role ment on specifics remains. All of the research developed by the Metro in the Denver region. The (forum) shalt Forum staff has been compiled in a separate volume which will be made develop these recommendations in the available upon request. context of an assessment of regional issues and trends and a determination. of the functions a regional agency The Metro Forum has taken the initiative in identifying the most effective should perform. As part of this determi- governance mechanism for implementing policies and actions that will nation, the (forum) shall analyze guide the future of the region. This approach reverses the process regional governance models imple- followed by many other regions which have developed first a vision for mented in other metropolitan areas. their future and then attempted to implement that vision without an adequate governance structure in place. Such efforts often result in The recommendations shall reflect a vision of the future development and frustration over the inability to achieve the vision. By focusing first on governance of the region as crafted by building governance capacity, the Metro Forum's approach ensures that the (forum). The membership of and the ability to implement a future vision is already established. process followed by the (forum) shall involve a wide diversity of interests and perspectives in an independent The time to act is now. The complex problems which face the region appraisal of regionalism in the Denver require patience, courage, creativity and common sense. The govern- metropolitan area. mental process required to solve these problems must ensure public confidence and mobilize the necessary leadership and resources. Our The (forum) shall establish a mission future will require focusing our attention on managing resources and for the regional agency and shall review DRCOG's current mission, functions, ensuring that we remain competitive with other economic regions in a structure, funding and authority in that global marketplace. context. Recommendations made by the (forum) shall be designed to ~ Although local governments are fully capable of responding to those improve regional decision-making and issues which are strictly local in nature, there is a continuing concern that enhance metropolitan cooperation. the capacity to address regional issues is lacking. There is an alternative to the often haphazard and uncoordinated attention to regional issues Elsie A. Lacy, Chairman which results and to this region's history of "piecemeal" solutions, Denver Regional Council of Governments represented by the creation of single-purpose regional institutions without any mechanism for coordinating their activities. The Metro Forum's recommendations will build on the strengths and benefits of local government by creating a regional governance process that operates through greater collaboration, cooperation, interdepen- dence and accountability. To implement the recommendations of the Metro Forum, the base of support for regional governance will have to be broadened .and regional leadership will have to emerge. To accomplish this, a new initiative must be established to advocate the recommended . regional governance structure, expand public awareness, and create a broader vision. 5 ~ACK~S~~~N~ The Metro Forum was created by the DRCOG Board in the Fall of 1990 after conversations among Board members and other elected officials identified the need for stronger regional cooperation and questioned the • effectiveness of DRCOG, given its structural limitations, in meeting that need. The members of the Metro Forum were appointed by the DRCOG Chairman to represent local government, business, state government, labor and community interests. The Metro Forum met regularly from . November 1990 through December 1991. Mission Based on the charge given by the DRCOG Board,, and subsequent discussions of the Metro Forum members, the following goals for the Metro Forum were identified: ? Assess regional issues and trends. ? Analyze regional governance models implemented in other metropolitan areas. ? Examine DRCOG and develop recommendations about its future role in the region. ? Determine the functions a regional agency should perform. ? Establish a mission for a new regional agency. ? Craft a proposal for the future governance of the Denver metro area designed to improve regional decision-making and enhance regional cooperation. Accomplishments During their tenure, the Metro Forum members achieved the following results: ? Identified key issues and problems impacting the region . through an iterative process, making use of members' expertise and the available, current opinion surveys. ? Selected water supply, surface transportation, air and water quality, solid waste, health care, open space, and regional revenue sharing and tax equity for further discussion. ? Established criteria for use in the design of a regional gover- • nance approach. ? Evaluated six alternative governance models and selected the Consolidated Metro County and the Umbrella Regional Plan- ning and Service Agency approaches for more detailed review. • This included meeting jointly with the Metro Leadership Caucus to examine the nature and feasibility of the two approaches. ? Selected the Umbrella Regional Planning and Service Agency as • the regional governance structure most appropriate for the particular requirements of the six-county metropolitan region. ? Outlined the specific components of the new regional gover- . nance structure and developed a strategy for creating the Umbrella Regional Planning and Service Agency. _ 6 FINDINGS Existing Conditions Overview Statement of the Problem THE CHALLENGE OF BUILDING COMPETITIVE REGIONS The existing system of regional governance in the Denver metropolitan Source: Vision Denver Metro, National area is comprised of a variety of independent, single-purpose districts Civic League Concept Paper, and authorities providing services on a regional basis in the areas of November 1991. wastewater treatment, drainage and flood control, transportation, cultural facilities, air quality, sports, facilities and water. The only The competitiveness and efficiency of multifunctional agency, the Denver Regional Council of Governments, communities comprising a metropolitan governments as members region increasingly depend on their ability though it includes most of the region's local b to function interdependently, to construe- and provides important services, is fundamentally a voluntary agency lively resolve conflicts, and to develop whose plans and recommendations are not binding on focal govern- consensus over critical issues. Whether it ments, special districts or other regional agencies. This fragmented and be the development of infrastructure oftentimes- competitive approach is not designed for tough decision- needed to support growth, the control of traffic to reduce pollution, the supply of making, resolution of conflicts, or implementation of a vision of future affordable housing to support new plant growth and development in any systematic manner. locations, or the sharing of resources for the sake of economy -communities are The Denver metro area continues to evolve as a regional community becoming increasingly dependent on without the emergence of an effective mechanism that can address each other in the pursuit of their own vital interests. metro-wide issues from a regional perspective. Governance capacity has failed to evolve to address the growing interdependence of leadership Despite the growing importance of and accountability required to address issues of improved infrastructure, learning to think and acf as a region, social services and protection of the environment. strong traditional sources of resistance remain -fear that inner city problems will Better Governa~tce Not More Government be distributed to the suburbs, concern that local autonomy will be compromised, or that more affluent communities or districts The past 30 years have seen a proliferation of single-purpose entities will be asked to share their largess with created to address certain issues or deliver certain services on an others. interjurisdictional or regional basis. At the same time, there are eight Creating a successful form of regional counties and 36 municipalities in the Denver region providing services governance requires balancing the needs and planning for future growth. The number of special districts of competitive economic development and exceeds 450. Clearly, there is no shortage of government in the Denver preservation of a desirable quality of life, region. However, these many governmental entities form a single on one side, with demands to maintain interdependent region. The problem is that there is inadequate coordina- local autonomy and accountability on the governments and made uate regional institutions.• Conse- other. But structural solutions - in•the lion among b q t form of new models of governance, new quently, an integrated regional governance structure is needed to layers of government, or new linkages improve cooperation and collaboration on regional issues. between existing agencies -will not in themselves produce effective regionalism. However, with the exception of the Denver Regional Council of In fact, voter sentiment around the country indicates a strong distaste for Governments, the successful attempts to establish regional institutions proposals creating more government. In have been single-purpose in nature. As a result, a number of regional order for regionalism to succeed in this issues have been addressed by the creation of asingle-purpose regional environment it will have to take a form functional agency and a number of other collaborative efforts have been which is broad-based, obtaining /egiti- pursued on an "ad hoc" basis. The region now exhibits a patchwork of macy from a wide range of stakeholders, and selectively combining existing and governmental entities operating with insufficient coordination and new regional functions in a coordinated accountability a "de facto" regional layer of governments. and efficient manner white assuring y . accountability. This incremental approach is successful for some very practical reasons. First, it is easier to link constituency, media and public support to one problem/one solution and obtain agreement. Second, it is far easier to 7 ; compromise and achieve results. That is the nature of the political process. Finally, it is far easier to mobilize support behind an effort to resolve a single issue, as opposed to advocating a new mechanism to resolve many problems. y The fallacy of the incremental approach is that it neglects the interrelationships between issues. There is no mechanism to handle Front Range Counties new issues as times change and the public's attention shifts. No mechanism has been developed which enables local governments to cooperatively plan for a range of key regional services and ensure their delivery is provided on an equitable and cost-effective basis. I Denver More importantly, there is no continuity over time no ~ accountabil- B°°lder ~ ity to maintain progress and performance in implementing regional Gilpin ,,1115 policies. Arapahoe Not surprisingly then, in spite of the political difficulties associated with Clear Creek establishing multi-purpose regional institutions, many civic leaders have Dangla5 continued to perceive multi-purpose solutions as the most effective way Jefferson to reduce the duplication, proliferation and fragmentation of local governments. Previous efforts to establish an efficient, effective and responsible regional governance structure have included a Governor's l; ; Optional Counties " task force which in 1966 recommended creation of an urban county; several legislative proposals during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s to strengthen regional planning or reorganize local government, and two attempts (1973 and 1980) to adopt a regional service authority through voter approval. Despite their differences, the results of each effort indicated that, in the absence of amulti-purpose regional mechanism, decisions on issues with regional significance were being made by individual entities with little visibility, oversight or accountability, or were being neglected altogether. This situation is present in the Denver region today. We continue. to lack the governmental capacity to make regional decisions, collaborate on solving regional problems on a consistent basis, and implement plans for the infrastructure and services necessary to support the growth antici- pated for the region. By adopting the Metro Forum recommendation for a regional gover- nance structure, the Denver region can begin to build that institutional capacity. Bzzildi>zg on Local Coz:trol throz~gh Accountability and Collaboration I The Metro Forum recognizes that each of the communities within the region has its own unique identity and that many issues are better addressed locally or subregionally (on an interjurisdictional basis). Thus, the new regional governance structure must balance the commitment to. regional problem-solving with the fundamental principle of local control. 8 Although residents of the Denver region currently enjoy a generally high level and quality of services, access to those services and the costs of those services are not distributed equitably between communities. In addition, many communities lack the institutional and financial capacity to plan for and provide the same high level and quality of services for new growth and development. In the absence of effective regional institutions, local governments are left to "fend for themselves" as they seek ways to guarantee a high quality of life for their residents. In the absence of effective regional institutions, local governments often are left with few options other than to compete against each other for growth, infrastructure, and tax rev- . enue. Similarly, local governments often lack the capacity alone to adequately respond to mandates issued by the state and federal governments. Major decisions affecting the region are made by outside authorities who may not take into account local perspectives. In particular, federal mandates, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, National Pollut- ant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations, and Subtitle D for Solid Waste, among others, cannot be adequately implemented without collaboration among local governments and regional functional agencies. In many cases, the financial resources necessary to deliver a Given service or develop needed infrastructure are beyond the capability of any individual community. In such cases, a mechanism is needed to marshal such resources on a regional basis and to equitably distribute the costs and benefits of developing those resources. Preserving the Denver Region's Unique Qualities The unique resources of the Denver region, the qualities that make it one of the more desirable places in the country in which to live,. are to a significant degree associated with the natural beauty of our physical environment and viability of our communities. By their very nature, growth and development will increase the pressures on our environ- mental resources and our ability to provide local and regional services. . At the same time, state and federal agencies are strengthening environ- mental standards and regulations, while local government financial capacity is becoming more and more limited. The Denver region needs to adopt an institutional framework in which to accomplish the delicate balancing of growth and development oppor- tunities while concurrently addressing such issues as air quality, solid waste management, water quality, toxic waste reduction and wetlands preservation. Our regional governance system should be designed to integrate the regulatory elements of the environmental protection system with the policies and financing decisions required to meet our infrastructure needs and growth requirements. 4 In attempting to establish this balance, there are trade-offs in making regional decisions. The longer establishing accountability for this responsibility is delayed, the more risk is involved. The risk lies in the Denver area repeating the mistakes of other regions, where growth has made solving environmental problems seem insurmountable. Without accountability, there is a risk of creating a government process that only adds to the costs of business and services and reduces productivity. The risk of losing the amenities that make Denver unique increases because we fail to solve problems early and creatively, thereby affecting future generations. Competing in an International Economy . With the growing internationalization of economies, many metropolitan areas, including Denver, are beginning to recognize the critical impor- tance of enhancing the ability of the region to compete within that international economy. Because of its location and unique qualities, Denver has advantages over many other metropolitan areas in capturing a share of the international market. The strategy in competing with other metropolitan regions, however, must be carefully planned and pursued on a regional basis. The future competitiveness of the Denver region will be measured against the opportunities and capacities of other regions. Population Dynamics of the Denver Metropolitan Region Over the past decade, the Denver metropolitan area suffered a severe economic downturn, with that trend showing a recent reversal. Even . ~ with the economic decline, the population growth rates were in excess of the national average. The Denver-Boulder Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) ranked 22nd in population among all metropoli- tan statistical areas nationwide in 1990. Despite the slow population growth in the second half of the 1980s, the region slipped only one place • in national rankings, from 21st in 1980. The :table on the following page shows population trends between 1980 and 1990. Although the Denver CMSA shows a 14.2 percent increase over the decade, the core city lost 5.1 percent, reflecting the "suburbanization" experienced by other metropolitan areas. This suburbanization has serious implications on service provision and the adequacy and fairness of the tax base, traffic congestion and air quality. The Denver region's population is traditionally younger than the national average, but this trend may move closer to the national average as the baby boom genera- lion reaches its peak earning potential (age 27 to 45} and approaches retirement. This has implications on the future size and quality of the labor force, social services and property tax increases. The ethnicity of the region also reflects national trends toward greater diversity as minority populations continue to grow. Many of these minority populations traditionally have tended to be younger, have larger households, less education and lower income. This diversifica- 10 f~ COiJ1VTi' 1990;Populationr ~ 1980 Population Change 80 '.90 °Numenc Change Adams 265,038 245,944 7.8 19,094 Arapahoe 391,51 I 293,292 33.5 98,219 Boulder 225,339 189,625 18.8 35,714 Denver 467,610 492,694 -5.1 (25,084) Douglas 60,391 25,153 140.1 35,238 Jefferson 438,430 371,753 17.9 66,677 Denver CMSA I 1,848,319 1,618,461 14.2 229,858 Source: 1990 and 1980 U.S. Bureau of the Census lion and regionalization of the minority population has implications for the education system, social services and the workforce. If we are to ensure continued improvements in the opportunities afforded these communities, we must work together as a region to provide equitable access to the benefits of living in the Denver region. Regional Citizenship There are clear signs that regional decisions are becoming more important to the average citizen. The new airport, the baseball stadium and the cultural facilities district are examples of regional voter participation. The establishment of the Metro Leadership Caucus to focus on metropolitan cooperation among business, political, and community leaders is another example of the growing consciousness of metro area issues. These efforts could be more ' effective if a mechanism were in place to direct the region's future, with the powers necessary to ensure implementation of that future. A traditional obstacle to greater regional cooperation has been persistent disagreements between the core city and the suburbs. Whether the battle is over annexation, water, schools, cultural facilities or public health services, an excuse is always available to justify conflict over cooperation. Such divisions are no longer relevant to the future of the metropolitan area. As noted previously, there are too'many ways in which we are integrated as a region, too many ways in which the future of the suburbs is inextricably tied to the future of the central city and the future of the central city is tied to the future of the suburbs. ~ A new regional governance structure will provide the necessary institutional mechanisms in which all local governments in the metropolitan area can convene to reach mutually beneficial solutions to problems of mutual concern. " 11 People Our Most Important Natural Resource As critical as the environment, the economy and the condition of infra- structure are to the future livability of our region, it is our people who are our most important resource. Thus, issues such as housing, health care, education and crime, are also appropriately treated as regional issues. Whether one is concerned with the quality of our workforce, the avail- ability and affordability of health care, or the safety of our streets, the impacts and often the solutions go beyond jurisdictional boundaries. A new regional governance structure should have the capacity to devise regional approaches to these and other human resource issues to ensure that all segments of our regional community share in the benefits of regional governance. REGIONAL FUNCTIONS • Water SuDp1V Systemwide planning, including projections of need and provision of facilities Set regional water policy based on a two-tier classification of system responsibilities Financing of major supply sources Mediation and resolution of conflicts Transoortation Systemwide planning, including projections of need and provision for facilities Set regional transportation policy Finance, construct and operate major systems Set priorities' ' Allocate resources Tax Eauity and Regional Revenue Sharing Manage appropriate tax base sharing plan Issue bonds for regional facilities Health Care Regional planning, including projections of need and provision of facilities/services Examine appropriate health care provision Strategic planning for all public sector providers Environment (Air and Water Qualitvl Regional planning Administer programs designed to protect and enhance air and water quality Solid Waste ' Regional planning Finance regional programs and facilities • Site regional facilities Open Space Regional planning Preservation programs Financing mechanisms Regional Functions and their Key Elements After discussing the issues and problems confronting the Denver area, the Metro Forum identified which problems require a regional solution. The initial discussion identified more than 20 issues for consideration. These issues were organized into functions which should be performed on a regional basis by a regional entity. Key elements and activities were identitied to further define the scope of each function. 12 i I • ~ N C I r. T W O O a ~ ~ E ~ ~ i v ~ o I - I ~ N N O~ cEOi I a j 01 q) } N Q I ~ I ~ C U O C 1~' 0 ~ ~ ~ I ~ C O L O I C C O O C O N .d.. I O 'O I i~~ t 1 N W ~ y 07 Y tU I~ « ~ t E ° > ~ a a p iv iu y c a r t ' U o a W ~ F I B ton ~ O O E = EnaMmg ":1' METRO COUNTY CONSOLIDATION ~ ° ' i { ` Km.. ~ c=creates In statute ! H = HgnB RWa Chener _I~I~~:~~:1~ :~I.~I~~• _ ~ v=Npie, Approval Miami i Dade County (Florida)) EHV Y Y PT Y Y ~Y Y Y Y Y H•HO.i Uni ov Indiana olis PA.Pw.F.PO _ ~enrTex 9 ( P 1 CH Y Y PT Y Y Y Y Y Y Y PT _ P Metro Toronto CH Y Y PT Y Y Y~ Y Y NA Y CT.L.H.HO,ED.PW,P sr=SaWnea Taz LGD =Loral Gavemmem Dues 2. 'REGIONAL-SERVICE AUTHORITY.' ( st =State Appropriations Metro olitan Service District, Portland z,cc AR=Arts p CV Y Y PT Y Y N I Y~ Y Y 1 Y cT=ca,ra 1 cc . camentlon comer UMBRELLA'AGENCY,-"' ~ ~ Ge ~ ~ ~ ~ Ec =Ecmomie Developmem - - t ~ _ _-:a .I..=.._~......sl:_.-._.l'.__r ED = Eaumtion _ Metro olitan Council, Twln Cities F=Foe P C Y~ N I PT ~ Y~ Y~ N I Y I Y Y Y~ SG.PA,HO AR 4 H= Healm _ - HO = HpRU9 ''~4.. STRONG REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCIES - "s'"'""'"~'""" NR =Natural Resources Atlanta Regional Commission C Y N LGD Y Y N I Y N Y Y EC.SC.NR,HS pA=paAa II PO =Police Vermont's Regional Planning Commissions C Y N ST Y N N Y N Y Y Ho.EC,ED.NR p„b,~ W,,,,, sc = senipr Ge:ana - - - I ~ ~ ' ~ ` ` ` ,'b-. ~ SLS = Stwea Local Services .'.'S.3.000NCILS`OF'GOVERNMENTS~~ r ~ i,F'~ ' _V..._a.,2 ~"s I u rl->~._I.~__...~I_.) ° : T=TOOdsm ' TSM = TransWttelgn System Denver Regional Council of Governments E Y N LGD N Y N~ N N Y Y sc•sLS,TSM _ Mallagarnenl sarvlces Nashville Re tonal Council z=zoo 9 E Y N LGD N Y N~ Y N Y Y sc.Ec Birmingham Regional Planning Commission E Y N LGD N Y N! N N Y N T. EC.sc Alternative Regional Governance Approaches The Metro Forum devoted a considerable amount of time reviewing a variety of different approaches to regional governance. Models from other metropolitan areas were examined and evaluated for their applica- bility to the Denver region. After this initial review, members of the Metro Forum expressed a clear preference for a stronger regional gover- nance approach. An early straw poll resulted in a focus on consolida- tion into a single metropolitan county and the umbrella agency regional oversight approaches. However, a continuing concern for regional • service delivery and improved local and regional planning coordination led to additional consideration of the multi-service district and strength- ened regional planning agency approaches. Specific regions and regional asencies studied by the Metro Forum include Indianapolis Unigov, Miami-Dade County, and Metropolitan Toronto as examples of regional consolidation similar to the metro county approach; the Metro Council of the Twin Cities as the original example of the "umbrella" approach; the Portland Metro Service District as the only directly elected regional multi-service district; and the . Atlanta Regional Commission as an example of a strengthened regional planning agency. Included in this review was a trip with the Metro Leadership Caucus to Minneapolis/St. Paul to review their experiences with the formation of an umbrella agency. 13 . t•I . CRITERIA Criteria Used to Evaluate and Design a Regional Governance Approach Representation, Citizen Involvement, and Responsiveness There are no established criteria in choosing a governance approach 'for • Citizen Support, Participation and Responsiveness the region. Where regional agencies have been created, the functions, • Representative Regional Decision-Making structure and financing all vary depending on the particular political and • Capacity to Respond to New Issues service requirements of the area. The Metro Forum selected 21 criteria and Problems as They Arise that should be met by any regional agency. Build on the Strengths of Local Although the Metro Forum made no attempt to either weight or classify Government and Communities the criteria, it was clear that the criteria could be grouped into five basic • Preserves Local Zoning and areas. The regional governance approach should be based- on strong "Police Power" • Maintains Local Identification citizen participation and responsiveness. It should preserve the strength • Increases Opportunities for and identity of local government, communties and neighborhoods. The Intergovernmental Cooperation approach should accomplish government reforms that reduce costs, and • Increases Regional Influence in State produce better government efficiency and effectiveness. At the regional and Federal Arenas level, the governance structure should achieve accountability in imple- menting decisions, providing efficient service delivery, and resolving Government Reform, Greater interjurisdictional conflicts. Through improved regional decision- Efficiencies and Effectiveness making, the metropolitan area should be more competitive in the interna- • Decreases Duplication/Fragmentation • Reduces Unnecessary, Costly tional economy and have a better quality of life. Competition • Enables Consolidation of Special Districts • • Reduces Overall Cost of Government Legislative Considerations • Increases Public/Private Sector Partnerships Once a preferred regional approach was determined, the Metro Forum • Equitable Taxation, Service Provision; . considered a number of options for implementing its recommendations. and Tax Sharing The discussion revolved around variations on three basic options Regional Accountability pursuing a new statute, amending existing statutes, and anon-legislative • Efficient Provision of "Regional" Services option using the existing Regional Service Authority Act. In considering • Provides Adequate Regional Powers for these options, members also discussed three alternative planning and Enforcing or Implementing Plans service delivery options as follow: • Interjurisdictional Conflict Resolution Capability 1. Combine certain existing regional agencies through a new statute. Competitiveness and Ouality of Life • Coordinated, Rational Land Use 2. Create a new regional umbrella agency with strengthened regional • Promotes Balanced and Broad-Based planning and oversight responsibilities, but without immediate Economic Development service delivery authority, either by a new statute or amendments to • Manages Growth to Enhance Positive existing statutes. Outcomes/Minimize Negative Impacts • Ensures Economic Competitiveness of 3. Establish a Regional Service Authority using existing statutes to the Region provide water supply and surface transportation services and • Preserves and Improves Environmental assume DRCOG's., planning functions, either by a local government Quality or a citizen-based initiative. Although all members agreed on the importance of both regional services and stronger planning, a majority preferred Option 2 as an initial step. ' However, there was sufficient interest in Option 3 for the members to . recommend this issue be further discussed by the successor organization to the Metro Forum. 14 CONCLUSIONS The Metro Forum has concluded that many of the issues which led to attempts to establish a stronger regional governance structure in the past continue to be of concern in the region today. The Metro Forum believes that the new regional governance structure it is proposing will effectively enable local governments to come together in the cooperative development of more efficient and effective service delivery and to plan for the growth and development of the region. The following are the Forum's primary conclusions: ? The Denver metropolitan area does not have in place a governance structure which can effectively solve critical regional issues I including water, transportation, air and water quality, solid waste, health care and open space. ~ ~ ? Recent successful initiatives (airport, convention center, cultural f district, baseball stadium district, jail facility site, economic develop- s ment network) and the collaborative attempts to solve metro area i transportation problems have strengthened regional cooperation relationships. Regional leadership is emerging in the metropolitan area in government, private sector, and community organizations, but it has been incremental and single-purpose. ? The region is searching for an appropriate approach to governmen- tal reorganization, but the Metro Forum considers the consolidation approach, including the metro county, to be too politically contro- versial. ? Creation of the Umbrella Regional Planning and Service Agency recommended by the Metro Forum will provide the necessary institutional mechanism to expand local government capacity, to address development and service delivery issues, and to integrate local governments and the various regional agencies into a more effective governance and service delivery system. ? Once the umbrella agency is created, an effort to craft a regional vision will be required to help the new regional governing system , guide future development and reach its full potential in solving regional issues. ? The new regional agency will enhance public accountability through citizen control of and participation in regional issues and decisions, by directly electing and/or appointing representatives. ? The new umbrella agency will provide an appropriate mechanism with adequate authority for financing regional infrastructure and services. ? The new umbrella agency will not duplicate existing agencies, but will provide for eliminating duplication and fragmentation in regional policy-setting and service provision while, at the same 15 s~-,.~--,., ~ ---r----- , time, will enhance the ability of existing agencies to come together to solve mutual problems. To summarize, a stronger regional governance approach will: ? Provide for a way to implement a shared vision for the future of the region. ? Match regional solutions to regional problems. ? Reduce counterproductive internal competitiveness between local governments. ? Provide for efficient management of our physical, human and financial resources as a requirement of regional decision-making. ? Accomplish the delicate balancing of growth and development opportunities with the preservation and enhancement of our environment and quality of life. ? Promote broad-based economic development within the region, as well as strengthen the competitiveness of the region in the interna- tional economy. 16 ~PP~NI)IX EXPLANATION OF THE counties, including Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, UMBRELLA REGIONAL PLANNING Denver, Douglas and Jefferson counties. AND SERVICE AGENCY 2. Other adjacent counties could request inclusion within the agency's planning and service area or The Metro Forum has selected the "umbrella regional could contract for specific services. Clear Creek planning and service agency" as its recommended and Gilpin counties, which currently are within approach for a new regional governance structure for the the DRCOG planning region, will be asked if Denver.. metropolitan area. The "umbrella agency" was they wish to be included in the initial selected as the approach that most effectively addresses boundaries. regional planning and service delivery issues and political feasibility. The Metro Forum defines the um- B. Procedure for Formation brella agency as follows: 1. One option for implementing the umbrella (1) A regional planning and coordinating agency with agency approach would be for the General the responsibility for developing regional policies Assembly to enact new legislation. In this and plans and ensuring their implementation by legislation, the General Assembly would either local governments and regional functional agencies. create the umbrella agency or the General Assembly would authorize creation upon a vote AND " of the people. (2) A regional service delivery agency with. the respon- 2. Another option would be for the General Assem- sibility for authorized services and for coordinating bly to adopt a series of amendments to existing the activities of other regional service delivery statutes, specifically the existing regional service agencies. authority statute and possibly to the existing regional planning statutes. Under this new regional governance structure, the commitment to regional problem-.solving is balanced 3. A third option would be to use the existing with the fundamental principle of local control. The Regional Service Authority (RSA) Act, simply umbrella agency approach will replace the existing ~ following its procedures for •formation of an regional governance structure with a more authoritative RSA. However, this option would not by itself and better coordinated approach to regional planning, address the strengthened regional planning and problem-solving, and service delivery. Specifically, the umbrella authority proposed by the Metro umbrella agency will replace the Denver Regional Forum. Council of Governments (DRCOG) and may consolidate some services now being provided by various special C. Relationship to Other Local Governments districts or other local governments. Local jurisdictions otherwise will continue to perform their customary local 1. Plannins. The new regional planning process functions and retain their constitutional powers. administered by the umbrella agency would provide all affected interests (municipalities, The following outlines the key features of the Umbrella counties, special districts, regional functional Regional Planning and Service Agency. agencies, state and federal agencies, private sector interests, and citizens) with a formal I. Creation process in which they come together to partici- pate in the cooperative development of more A. Geographic Boundaries efficient and effective service delivery for the metropolitan area and each of the communities ' 1. An umbrella agency in the Denver region would within the region. have responsibility within the six metro area . 17 2. Fundamentally, this new regional approach II. Structure would assign to the umbrella agency the respon- sibility for setting regional policies and. planning A. Governing Body for regional investments and services. Local governments and regional functional agencies 1. The council/board would have formal authority would coordinate with the umbrella agency in to discharge the responsibilities and direct the ensuring consistency with regional policies and activities of the umbrella agency. plans. 2. The council/board would be elected, appointed, 3. To facilitate the performance of these roles, new or both, from districts specially created for that planning and coordinating requirements would purpose, or both from districts and at large. be established to ensure consistency and com- patibility of local and regional functional agency 3. The council/board would choose apresident/ plans, programs and pro}ects with each other chairman from among its members. Such and with the regional policies and plans. In president/chairman would have additional addition, the umbrella agency would have the duties as presiding officer of the council/board. authority necessary to enforce these require- ments. A variety of enforcement mechanisms B. Executive Director . would be made available to the umbrella agency. 1. The council board would appoint an executive 4. Service Delivery. It is anticipated that the director to carry out the policies established by umbrella agency will be authorized to deliver the council/board and oversee the daily opera- certain services on a regional basis. If specific Lions of the umbrella agency. ' services are not authorized at the time the umbrella agency is created, provisions would be 2. The executive director also would serve as included to pursue authorization at a later date. liaison with the other regional functional It is also possible that new regional functional agencies: agencies could be created. In both cases, provi- sions would be included to address the impacts C. Policy-malting Structure on entities currently providing such services or functions on a local or interjurisdictional basis. 1. The umbrella agency would administer its Either exceptions would have to be made to regional planning and service functions through allow certain existing practices to continue or a structure and policy-making process designed procedures for the equitable transfer of assets, to involve all interested parties. rights and liabilities would have to be provided. 2. Additional procedures would be outlined for the 5. The umbrella agency also would be given the involvement of regional functional agencies in responsibility for ensuring the activities of the development of regional policies and plans existing and future regional functional agencies affecting their particular regional function. are carried out in conformance with the regional policies and plans. Specific tools would be made 3. The policy-making structure and process estab- available to the umbrella agency For carrying out lished by the umbrella agency to administer its this responsibility. The availability of these tools regional planning and service .functions would could vary depending on the particular circum- include standing committees of the council/ stances of the given regional functional agency. board, as well as advisory committees and task forces to provide advice and. recommendations 6. With the above exceptions, existing special to the council/board. districts, municipalities, counties and regional functional agencies would retain their current identities and powers. 1 18 .I III. Powers and Duties 2. Service Delivery. The umbrella agency also would be authorized to provide or coordinate A. Functions the provision of certain regional services and functions. Assumption of such authority could 1. Planning. The fundamental function of the be accomplished through the regional service umbrella agency would be to plan for and authority statute, as noted above, or specifically coordinate the efficient, equitable and sustain- authorized in a separate statute. The Metro able development of the Denver region. This Forum has identified the following functions as function, which would replace the current functions more sensibly provided on a regional DRCOG planning function, would be carried out basis and that might be authorized to the by performing the following activities: umbrella agency or otherwise authorized and tied into the umbrella agency process. The a. The umbrella agency would prepare along- specific regional aspects of each function that range, comprehensive plan for the growth and could be the responsibility of an umbrella agency development of the region. Affected agencies remain to be decided. and jurisdictions would be involved in the plan development process. The regional plan, with its a. Water supply, establishment of regional policies and priorities, b. Surface transportation, would serve as a framework for preparation of c. Solid waste disposal, the plans, programs and projects of regional d. Air and water quality, functional agencies and of local governments. It e. Parks, recreation and open space, also would serve as a framework for evaluating f. Certain health and hospital services, the interjurisdictional and regional impact of such as indigent care, and such plans, programs and projects. g. Tax equity and regional revenue sharing. b. The umbrella agency also would develop This list is not necessarily exhaustive. The regional policies and regional plans for specific General Assembly might add others to it. Also, regional functions and services. These would the Regional Service Authority statute lists a include but not be limited to plans for regional number of other possible regional services. In systems such as highways, air quality, transit, addition, services now being provided by other wastewater treatment, water supply, parks and regional agencies could be transferred to the open space, solid waste and airports. Such umbrella agency. These other regional agencies policies and plans would be incorporated as could be transferred at the outset or studied for elements in the comprehensive plan. possible future transfer. Further, it could be decided that the umbrella agency will be given c. The umbrella agency would provide technical only minimal service delivery authority initially, . assistance for local government and regional with additional authority to be sought at a later functional agency planning efforts. date. d. Consistent with the regional planning function, 3. Counties, municipalities, special districts and the umbrella agency would be designated as the regional functional agencies would be encour- official planning agency for all state and federal aged to secure any services or functions pro- programs in the region. DRCOG's existing vided by the umbrella agency. Duplication of designations -Metropolitan Planning Organiza- services would be discouraged but not prohib- tion (MPO) for transportation, Area Agency on iced. Provisions would be made for the equitable Aging (AAA) for aging services, and Section 208 transfer of the appropriate assets, rights and of the Clean Water Act for water quality - liabilities of all municipalities, special districts would be transferred to the umbrella agency. and regional functional agencies that are associ- Other designations, such as lead air quality ated with the regional services and functions"~ • planning under the Clean Air Act, should be provided by the umbrella agency, as appropriate. reviewed for transfer. 19 f . B. Enforcement Authority situations where there is a conflict between the regional policies or plans and the plans, 1. In ordec for the umbrella agency to effectively programs or projects of any county, munici- implement the regional planning function, it pality, special district or regional functional • must have adequate statutory authority. This agency, mediation would be a key compo- ~ means the umbrella agency must be authorized nent in the process of reconciling differences to employ a number of enforcement tools and in a manner consistent with regional policies ~ mechanisms to ensure that special districts, 'and plans. municipalities, counties and regional functional agencies develop plans, programs and projects C. Financing Authority that are consistent with the regional policies and ~ plans. These enforcement tools and mechanisms 1. In order to adequately fund its responsibili- describe the essential nature of the "umbrella" ties and reinforce its status as an indepen- relationship between the umbrella agency and dent regional decision-making agency, the other entities. They include the authority to: umbrella agency would be provided with stable, diverse and independent financing a. Approve local government long-range authority. plans and regional agency plans; 2. Sources of funding for the activities of the b. Approve the capital budgets and programs umbrella agency would include the of regional agencies; following: c. Suspend public or private projects deter- a. Authority to levy taxes, . mined to have regional significance, unless they are part of a conforming plan and are b. Service charges and fees, as appropriate, not otherwise found inconsistent with the for specific regional functions and services regional policies and plans; and and expenses related to the umbrella agency's oversight responsibilities, d. Approve applications for federal and state funds for plans, programs and projects c. Federal, state, local, foundation and with an identified regional impact. private sector grants and state appropria- lions to support specific activities, and 2. An additional tool which would enable the umbrella agency to implement regional d. Miscellaneous sources, including interest policies and plans is the authority to issue income and sales of publications. bonds for approved infrastructure and capital improvements. Prepared for the Metro Forum 3. Another critical tool for ensuring an effective December 1991 regional planning process is mediation. In 20 n 1 DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE GREG HALL MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCHOLL CAROLINE.FISHER JIM.HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX d~D=D~E=T-Ci--~' LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER FILE JODY DOSTER ~ MANIIEL MEDINA MEMORANDUM T0: RON PHILLIPS, TOWN .MANAGER FROM: KEN HUGHEY, TNTERTM DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: MAY 18, 1992 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 18 - MAY 22, 1992 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Replace cribwall on bikepath near Sundial. 2. Continue spring clean up of cinders throughout Town and haul them off. 3. Continue .with retrofit of southside Pedestrian Overpass. 4. Put on extra people for the upcoming Memorial Day weekend. 5. Hire (2) cracksealers for summer season.. 6. Restripe crosswalks at little_4-Way and lst Bank. 7. Repair catch basin at West Lionshead Circle by the VA gate. 8. Prepare list for patching. 9. Recompact and reinstall pavers in Lionshead. 10. Retrieve fallen trees from Gore Creek for high water season. 11. Repair shoulders on various bike paths: a. Red Sandstone b. Bridge Road ~12. Check culverts for high water throughout Town. 13. Replace concrete for bus barn heating system repair. 14. Prepare Childrens Fountain for operation for this coming Memorial Day weekend. 15. Check with Rec. District about moving and picking up a trailer for Minturn Memorial Day activities. 16. Check with Rec. District regarding power for Memorial Day activities. 17. After irrigation repair, replace bricks at west end LH Mall. PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1. Confirm with PCL, west exhaust fan status., 2. Repair Library smoke sensors. 3. Assist with TRC art project. 4. Resolve paver problems. ' 5. Paint structure as needed. 6. Paint jail at Municipal Building. CARPENTERS A. 1. Construct cabinets and shelves for new Com Dev. 2. Replace retaining wall at Mill Creek Building. 3. Construct restroom building for Stephens Park. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Continue remodel at Old Post Office. 2. Repair computer room lighting system. 3. Trouble shoot Bighorn Park sprinkler disconnect. 4. Repair lights at the following locations: a. Old Town Shop b. East gate in Lionshead 5. Repair Transit Operation's office light switch. 6. Construct new microphone system for Council Chambers at Municipal Building. 7. Add new lights at Manor Vail Covered Bridge. 8. Run conduit for irrigation system both north and south at VTRC. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Finalize Stephen's Park easements with Larry Eskwith. 2. Make Lionshead Plaza documents available to bidders. 3. Work with planners on Ski Museum site. 4. Obtain VTRC completion schedule from Valley Crest. 5. Obtain bids for "Trees for Vail" irrigation system and tree purchase. 6. Complete Phase II Stephen's Park plans and prepare for bid. 7. Complete landscape plan for Com. Dev, remodel. 8. Schedule setting new utility pole at Stephens Park. 9. Check out seed at rockfall berm. 10. After irrigation. repair, replace bricks at west end LH Mall. KH/dr ~/~m G, T ~ ~ v~rn can should~• bu• I~ski area ~ Q . y. (Editor's Note: This column roas same last name anyway! originally printed in the ~ „~''t`=~''~'~ L ~ ~ Denver owns and operates Breckenridge Journal and is 1 a"• Winter Park, an art museum, a reprinted in the interest of our ~ ;r natural history museum, a readers.) - convention center, a major airport, ,3 i a stadium, and a water system. Editor: ~ Canon City owns the Royal Gorge. Consider this an open letter to - r` ~ + Other cities own utility companies, the residents and investors of the ~ ~ transportation systems, race Kingdom of Breckenridge. Now is Y, tracks, property, etc. This is not the time to come to the aid ofyour ~ new or different. It is just a matter. ~ i Kingdom. of stepprng up and saying our The realities of the changing OpinlOn ~ future is important and we are world are all around us. To be site going into this together. Certainly . specific, in the upper Blue River !By J.~. +~c0i0rad0++,Far[ = the ski mountain needs basin, we have the Breckenridge - - - ~ ~ Breckenridge and Breckenridge Ski Corp. It is owned by a foreign Because of this, we have a needs a solid, modern, well-staffed, investor from a country that is Breckenridge Resort Chamber to dependable, well-run mountain! having severe economic pains that try to help coordinate and weld the Sure, ideas are simple; are greatly affecting the money town and mountain together. implementation and management The challenge now, today, is to base ofthat country. That is the sa to eve entit from the town are hard. But look at•the Kingdom sole reason that the Breckenridge to the BRC aand all~those interested today. It was a near ghost town not Ski Area abruptly cancelled their many years ago. Today it is expansion plans and reduced staff in Breckenridge, let's buy the ski topnotch in almost every way, from area oursQlves! . a year ago. ~ i:, a local government to quality. It is obvious to me that this . • " Raisi' the bonds tii pay the price businesses. An essentially new •resort will be put~up for sale ' and buy tNe aria; Th~i1~CYeat~•a ' ~ '"%'infrastructufe`is'in pl~ci;~for watbf^ r quickly, if not sooner. That means Winter Park-type operation that and sewer, streets, town hall, another new romance in hoping for can fund an expansion. The prof is parks, a recreation center, and fire a suitable long-term investor that .can be plowed back into an protection. Those all seemed can mix and match well with the environmentally sound, impossible dreams just a few years folks in the Kingdom at the foot of controlled-growth ski mountain ago. Today they are taken for the hill. run on the basis that fits tl~e granted. It is also no secret that much of community and that works with ~ Why not buy the ski area? The the expansion in the town of the summer plans for the future. town has some creative Breckenridge was based on what Sure, it is a big tax load. But, if management people and there are the owners of the ski mountain we believe in what we are doing easier ways to finance public were going to do. Right now there ~ and we work at it together, why projects than private projects is a base facility, ifyou will, thttt is can't it be done? I see no great today. over built for the mountain obstacles that would be any The recent events on the capacity. This is especially true different for a community than for mountain, in Congress, combined when you look at the needed private investors. with Lheir view of the ski industry, balance between winter and There may be some tax breaks and in the Japanese financial summer and how the expansion with public ownership as opposed markets, make this an urgent was going to be a giant boost to the to ownership by a private investor issue. Critical timing is involved summer business. from out of the area. And the for next year's operation of the Should the town try to be a part profits stay athome! facility and the proper promotion of • of the search to find a buyer for the But, we better be quick. There the area. A year's loss of direction area - sort of a shotgun wedding will be a fire sale on this property. and mor.~entum could wipe out the approach? Or, should the Town be .There may never again be this gains of the last several years. In the buyer? window of opportunity to really ~ terms of market share and public Breckenridge Ski Corp, is really bring the bride and groom to the relations, this fact alone could be a the only major ski area in Colorado altar in a marriage that is one of drastic expense to Lhe entire that does not own or manage a the most natural in Colorado. The major portion of the base facilities. Town and the ski area have the Please see FARR, PAGE 5 • w k'rt: ,~:~-cs.~- nit ,/~`.:"r turd ~ _ t~ V. l: t,.- S t.Y '~_`.--T__-.r gel 3 ' ~ : ~ ~ ' The BRC+`? t r n dom a • aid of tre Ki g d fatheTS, and ' ~ , FARR, PAGE 4 town mothers an catty meet ' Continued from the B n future for a community• Board and RC residents shout urg rI`he'ro`Nn eeting to and seize our ow erati.ve coop s ecial m ether. As a should cal t,oris. Out of that coordinate an encyr we have discuss o a Ian should be profitable venture tog governmental ag force the t"eetinged and authority owers that can ith us develop et things m°v~ng- some P oration to deal w assigned tog on the routine ski core ht_of-refusal basis not wait rd. It on a first-rig not now? This cans of the TownbO tune the in good faith. neratinn Cncerflls ~?eeting edited to caao of J.D• pnrr, a ihird~8 row Insuran . . uSt 1)e eXP wln W IarMer in A reflect !hose of m y of this nnliue. is ° / al necessarily oPP°rtunit apininut NewsP°pers. t? Now is the time to come to the Barn AGENDA Present Absent LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY Bishop Simonett REGULAR MEETING Fried MAY 13, 1992 Thomas 10:00 A.M. Wilson 1. Consideration of the Authority of the following for I.R.A. of Vail, Inc., dba,.Bart & Yeti's: a. Corporate Structure Change Ross Davis, Jr. remaining as President, Director, and 36.63% stockholder Maureen A'Iulrooney, Director and 25$ stockholder; replacing Allison Parrish as Vice-President Allison Parrish, Director and 20.91$ stockholder; replacing Dan Mulrooney as Secretary William Jewitt, Director and 17.460 stockholder; replacing Dan Mulrooney as Treasurer BILL JEWITT AND ALLISON PARRISH PRESENT. APPROVED: 4-0 b. Registered Manager Allison Parrish replacing Dan Mulrooney APPROVED: 4-0 2. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/Spirituous Beverages, for the Town of Vail, on Saturday, July 11, 1992, from 8:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., at the location of Ford Park/Lower Bench/700 Block of South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: Rondall V. Phillips - Town Manager Bob Mach - Event Manager BOB MACH PRESENT. APPROVED: 4-0 3. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/Spirituous Beverages, for the Vail/ Eagle Valley Rotary Club, on Sunday, June 14, 1992, from 2:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., at the location of Ford Park/Lower Bench/ 700 Block of South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: Sanford Treat - President Jeff Bowen - Event Manager JEFF BOWEN PRESENT. APPROVED: 4-0 4. Notification to the Authority of recent renewals: a. Village Inn Plaza Liquors, Inc., dba, Village Inn Plaza Liquors b. Sonnenalp Properties, Inc., dba, Sonnenalp Restaurant c. Vail Valley Foundation, dba, Gerald R. Ford Amphitheatre d. Jackalope, Inc., dba, Jackalope Cafe & Cantina APPROVED: 4°0 5. Any other matters the Authority wishes to discuss. NONE. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:20 A.M. TOWN OF VAIL Vail Local Licensing Authority Martha S. Raecker Secretary to the Authority VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING, TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 7:30 P.M. ~VISED EXPANDEb AGEI~DA--~ 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Eskwith repealing and reenacting Chapter 5.08 Business and Occupation Tax Ron Phillips -Ski Lifts, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Action Requested of Council: Approveldeny/modify the ordinance. Background Rationale: First reading of this ordinance was tabled from May 5, 1992 to this meeting. This tax imposes a 4% tax on the sale of lift tickets by any ski area within the Town. (Please note minor wording changes to 5.08.020(J) and 5.08.070(6). Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, on first reading. 7:55 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Mike Mollica rezoning a parcel of property` from Public Accommodation District to Public Use District, generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the rezoning of said property. (*Commonly referred to as the "Ski Museum Pocket Park") Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, on first reading. Background Rationale: On May 11, 1992, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning from Public Accommodation to Public Use District. The vote was 5-0. Please see the attached staff memorandum dated May 11, 1992, for further background information. Staff Recommendation: The staff recommendation is for approval of Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, on first reading. 8:15 P.M. 4. Discussion of Pitkin Creek Townhome Bond Restructuring. Steve Jeffers 8:45 P.M. 5. Adjournment. C:WGENDA.TCE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1992 7:30 P.M. EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. Ten Year Employee Recognition. . Pam Brandmeyer Joe Van Auken, Police Department. 7:45 P.M. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:50 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Eskwith repealing and reenacting Chapter 5.08 Business and Occupation Tax Ron Phillips -Ski Lifts, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Action Requested of Council,: Approve/deny/modify the ordinance. Backqround Rationale: First reading of this ordinance was tabled from May 5, 1992 to this meeting. This tax imposes a 4% tax on the sale of lift tickets by any ski area within the Town. (Please note minor wording changes to 5.08.020(J) and 5.08.070(6). Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, on first reading. 8:10 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Mike Mollica rezoning a parcel of property' from Public Accommodation District to Public Use District, generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and legally described in the attached Exhibit A; and amending the official zoning map in relation to the rezoning of said property. ('Commonly referred to as the "Ski Museum Pocket Park") Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, on first reading. Backqround Rationale: On May 11, 1992, the Planning and Environmental Commission unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning from Public Accommodation to Public Use District. The vote was 5-0. Please see the attached staff memorandum dated May 11, 1992, for further background information. Staff Recommendation: The staff recommendation is for approval of Ordinance No. 16, Series of 1992, on first reading. 8:30 P.M. 5. Adjournment. C:WGENDA.TCE ~aPy , ~ /Z~UiS~oNS ` ~ ~ 0 L~ ORDINANCE NO. 14 Series of 1992 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 5.08 BUSINESS AND OCCUPATION TAX -SKI LIFTS, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO: 1. Chapter 5.08 Business and Occupation -Ski Lifts of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows: Chapter 5.08 -Ski Area Lift Ticket Admissions Tax 5.08.010 Purpose and Legislative Intent A. The Town Council finds, determines, and declares that considering the nature of the business of operating ski lifts and ski tows and the relation of such business to the municipal welfare as well as the relation thereof to the expenditures required of the Town, and a proper, just, and equitable distribution of tax burdens within the Town, and all other matters proper to be considered in regard thereto, that the imposition of an admission tax on such places of business is reasonable, proper, and nondiscriminatory and that the amount of the tax imposed by this Chapter for exercising the taxable privilege of purchasing admission is reasonable, proper, uniform, and nondiscriminatory and necessary for a just and proper distribution of tax burdens within the Town. B. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent of the Town Council that, for the purposes of this Chapter, every person who purchases an admission toy a ski lift or ski tow is exercising a taxable privilege. C. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent of the Town Council that on and after the effective date of this ordinance every person who pays to purchase a ski lift ticket to be admitted to a ski lift or ski taw shall pay, and every person whether owner, lessee, or operator who charges for the purchase of a ski lift ticket for the admission to a ski lift or ski tow shall collect, as agent for the Town, the tax imposed by this Chapter. 5.08.020 Definitions A. ~ Admission shall mean the right to an occupancy of a seat or position of a person, who, for a consideration, uses, possesses or has the right to use or possess an occupancy of a seat or position to any ski lift or ski tow operated in the Town. B. Purchase or sale shall mean contract'for sale and include any transaction for the furnishing by any ski area to any person of the taxable privilege of admission to a ski lift or ski 1 tow. C. Purchaser shall mean any person to whom the taxable privilege of admission is, or has been, rendered. D. Tax shall mean either the tax payable by the purchaser or the aggregate amount of taxes due from a vendor. E. Taxpayer shall mean any person obligated to account to the Finance Director for taxes collected or to be collected, or from whom a tax is due, under the terms of this article. F. Vendor shall mean a person making a sale to a purchaser of the taxable privilege of admission. G. Lift ticket means any certificate, card, slip, token, badge, patch, or other signification that a fee has been paid entitling the holder of such signification or another to be admitted to ski lift or ski tow. H. Person means and includes a natural person, corporation, trust, partnership, association, joint venture, two or more persons having a joint or common interest, any other legal or commercial entity, or a receiver, executor, trustee, conservator, or other representative appointed by any order of any court. I. Ski area means any place or business which operates ski lifts which are open to the public upon the purchase of a lift ticket. J. Ski lift means any gondola lift, poma lift, chair lift, t-bar tows, trams, or any other facility designed to be used or operated in connection with the transporting of an individual or individuals up or down a slope, hillside, or mountainside for the purposes of skiing, snowboarding, sightseeing, or other recreational activity. K. Ski area operator means any person who owns, leases, or operates a ski area. L. Finance Director shall mean the Director of Finance of the Town of Vail. 5.08.030 A. On and after the effective date of this ordinance, there is levied and there shall be paid and collected, an excise tax by every person exercising the taxable privilege of this Chapter, for the exercise of such privilege. B. The amount of tax hereby levied is four percent (4%) on the price paid for each admission, and is in addition to all other taxes imposed by law. 5.08.040 It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person who pays to purchase an admission 2 in the Town of Vail to fail to pay, or for any vendor who sells admissions, to fail to collect, as agent for the Town, the tax levied by this chapter. 5.08.040 Exempt Transactions A. Refunds In the event that a lift ticket fee is refunded for any reason, the admissions tax is no longer applicable and shall be refunded along with the admission price. B. The providing of admission, where no lift ticket price is charged or paid shall exempt said person from the payment of the admission tax; however, in the event that a reduced charge for admission is made, the tax imposed in this chapter is applicable to the amount of such charge. 5.08.050 Administration The Finance Director is hereby authorized to adopt such rules and regulations for the administration of this chapter as he or she deems necessary, and the payment of the taxes and of making and filing of statements or returns as prescribed in this chapter shall be done in the manner and on the forms prescribed by the Finance Director. 5.08.060 Licenses and Reporting Procedures A. The Finance Director may require any person to make such return, render such statement or keep and furnish such records as the Director of Finance may deem sufficient and reasonable to show whether or not such person is liable under this article for the payment or collection of the tax imposed herein. B. Every vendor must obtain, without charge., a license to collect the tax, and must report on forms prescribed by the Director of Finance for such taxes, and remit to the Town. the collected taxes on or before the 20th day of the month for the preceding month or months. 5.08.070 Collection of Tax by Vendor; Liability A. Every vendor making a sale to a purchaser which is taxable under the provisions of this article is required at the time of making such sale to collect the tax imposed by this article from the purchaser. B. Whenever admissions are sold under an installment purchase-plan, or a purchase plan allowing deferred payment, the tax levied by this article shall be based on the total purchase price. Such tax shall be collected at the tlme of the initial payment. C. The tax to be collected as provided herein shall be conspicuously, indelibly, and separately stated and charged from the sale price on the ticket or card evidencing the safe, and 3 shown separately from the sale price on any record made thereof at the time of the sale or at the time when evidence of the sale is first issued or employed by the vendor, provided, however, that when added, such tax shall constitute a part of such purchase price or charge and shall be a debt from the purchaser to the vendor until paid and shall be recoverable at law in the same manner as other debts. The tax shall be paid by the purchaser to the vendor, who, as trustee for and on account of the Town, shall be liable to the Town for the collection and return thereof. D. Every vendor shall add the tax imposed by this article to the purchase price, charge or other consideration paid for the taxable privilege of admission, provided, however, that the vendor shall be liable and responsible to the Town for the payment of an amount equivalent to said tax on each such admission based on his gross taxable sales of lift tickets irrespective of the provision of Section 5.08:010. E. The vendor shall prepare and file returns showing taxes due hereunder in such manner and upon such forms as the Finance Director may prescribe, provided that returns must be filed and the tax paid on or before the fifteenth day of the month next following the month of sale, unless the Finance Director prescribes a different time. F. A credit will be allowed the vendor in the return of sales of admissions for admissions that have been surrendered by the purchaser, provided that the full sale price thereof and the full tax due and paid thereon have been refunded by the vendor to the purchaser. G. Taxes paid hereunder on admissions represented by accounts that are unsecured by conditional sales contracts or security agreements, that are found to be worthless, and that are actually and properly charged off as bad debts for the purpose of income-tax reporting under the laws of the United States, may be credited upon subsequent returns of the tax, but if any such accounts are thereafter collected by the vendor, a tax shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this article upon the amount so collected. 5.08.080 Duty to Keep Books and Records It shall be the duty of every vendor to keep and preserve suitable records of all sales made by such vendor and such other books or accounts as may be necessary to determine the amount of the tax for the collection or payment of which such vendor is liable under this article. It shall be the duty of every such vendor to keep and preserve for a period of three (3) years following the due date of the return or the payment of the tax all such books, invoices, and other records necessary to determine the tax and the same shall be open for examination by the Finance Director. Upon demand by the Finance Director such vendor shall make the books, 4 invoices, accounts, or other records it maintains available at the office of the Finance Director or some other place designated by the Finance Director, for examination, inspection, and audit by the Finance Director. The Finance Director, in the Finance Director's discretion may make, permit, or cause to be made, the examination, inspection or audit of books, -invoices, accounts and other records so kept or maintained by such vendor. When such vendor shall have entered into a binding agreement with the Town to reimburse it for all costs and expenses incurred by the Town in order to have such examination, inspection or audit at a place other than the place designated by the Finance Director, then such examination, inspection or audit shall be made where such records are kept or maintained by the vendor or as otherwise designated in the agreement. 5.08.090 Trust Status of Tax in Possession of Vendors All sums of money paid by the purchaser to the vendor as taxes imposed by this article shall be and remain public money, the property of the Town, in the hands of such vendor, and the vendor shall hold the same in trust for the sole use and benefit of the Town until paid to the Finance Director as provided in this article, and for failure so to pay the Finance Director, such vendor shall be punished for a violation hereof. 5.08.100 Examination of Returns; Refunds, Credits and Deficiencies As-soon as practicable after the return is filed under this article, the Finance Director shall examine it and: (1) If it then appears that the correct amount of tax to be remitted is greater or less than that shown in the return, the tax shall be recomputed; (2) if the amount paid exceeds that which is due, the excess shall be refunded or credited against any subsequent remittance from the same person; (3) If the amount paid is less than the amount due, the difference, together with interest thereon at the rate of one-half of one percent per month from the time the return was due, shall be paid by the taxpayer within thirty (30) days after written notice and demand to the taxpayer from the Finance Director, subject to the taxpayer's exercising within such thirty (30) day period the right to administrative and legal remedies available under Sections 5.08.140 and 5.08.190. 5.08.110 Interest on Late Payments, Penalty A. In any case in which a vendor fails to file a return or pay over the tax within the time required by this article, but without the intent to defraud, there shall be added as a penalty, 5 ten (10) percent of the total amount of the deficiency, but not less than ten dollars ($10.00), and interest in such cases shall be collected at the rate of one (1) percent each month, or fraction thereof, on the amount due on the deficiency from the time the return was due to the date the tax is paid, which interest and addition shall become due and payable within twenty (20) days after the written notice and demand by the Finance Director, and such interest shall be assessed, collected, and paid in the same manner as the tax itself. B. Payments of part but less than all of a deficiency, including interest, or interest and penalty, shall be first applied to penalty, if any, secondly to accrued interest, and, lastly, to the tax itself. 5.08.120 Penalty for Deficiency Caused by Fraud If any part of the deficiency is due to fraud with the intent to evade the tax, then there shall be added fifty (50) percent of the total amount of the deficiency, and in such case the whole amount of the tax unpaid, including the addition, shall become due and payable thirty (30) days after written notice and demand by the Finance Director, subject to review as provided in Sections 5.08.140 and 5.08.190, and an additional one (1) percent per month on such amount shall be added from the date the return was due until paid. 5.08.130 Investigation of Vendor's Books For the purpose of .ascertaining the correctness of a return, or for the purpose of determining the amount of tax due from any person, the Finance Director may issue subpoenas, subpoenas duces tecum, hold investigations and hearings concerning any matters covered by this article, and may examine any relevant books, papers, records or memoranda, of any such person and may require the attendance of such person, or any officer or employee of such person, or of any person having knowledge of such sales, and may take testimony and require proof for his information. The Finance Director shall have power to administer oaths to such persons. 5.08.140 Recovery of Taxes, Penalty, and Interest A. All sums of money paid by any person purchasing a lift ticket from any vendor shall be and remain public money, the property of the Town in the hands of such vendor, and he shall hold the same in trust for the sole use and benefit of the Town until paid to the Finance Director, and for failure to so pay to the Finance Director, such vendor shall be punished as provided herein. B. 1) If a vendor neglects or refuses to make a return in payment of the tax required by this chapter, the Finance Director shall estimate the amount of taxes due, based upon 6 such information as may be available, for the period or periods which the vendor is delinquent; and upon the basis of such estimated amount compute and assess in addition thereto a penalty equal to ten percent (10%) thereof, together with interest on such delinquent taxes at the rate of one percent (1 per month from the date when due. 2) Promptly thereafter the Finance Director shall give to the delinquent vendor notice of such estimated taxes, penalty, and interest. 3) Such estimates shall thereupon become an assessment, and such assessment shall be final and due and payable from the vendor to the Town thirty (30) days from the date of the mailing of the notice by first class mail directed to the last known address of such person on file with the Finance Department. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of deficiency is mailed, the vendor may petition the Finance Director for a hearing on a revision or modification of such assessment. The filing of a petition shat! not toll the accrual of interest on the amount of taxes due. 4) Such petition shall be in writing, and the facts and figures submitted shall be submitted under oath either in writing or orally at a hearing scheduled by the Director of Finance. The hearing shall take place in the office of the Director of Finance and notice thereof, and the proceedings shall be in substantial conformity with C.R.S. 1973, 24-4-105 except as modified by regulations issued by the Director of Finance. 5) Thereupon, the Director of Finance shall make a final determination and, if appropriate, modify such assessment in accordance with the facts submitted, which facts the Director of Finance deems correct. Such assessment, as modified, shall be considered a final order of assessment of the Director of Finance and may be reviewed under Rule 106(a)(4) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure provided, that the taxpayer has given written notice to the Town Manager of such intention to petition for review under Rule 106(a)(4) within ten (10) calendar days after notice of the final order of assessment. 5.08.150 Hearings, Subpoenas and Witness Fees All subpoenas issued under the terms of this article may be served by any person aged eighteen (18) years or older. The fees of witnesses for attendance and travel shall be the same as the fees of witnesses before the district courts of the state, such fees to be paid when the witness is excused from further attendance. When a witness is subpoenaed at the instance of any party other than the Finance Director to any such proceeding, the Finance Director may require that the cost of service of the subpoena and the fee of the witness be borne by the party 7 3 at whose instance the witness is summoned. In such case, the Finance Director, in the Finance Director's discretion, may require a deposit to cover the cost of such service and witness fees. A subpoena issued as aforesaid shall be served in the same manner as a subpoena issued out of a court of record. 5.08.160 Judge to Compel Attendance Any judge of the district court of the fifth judicial district of the state, upon the application of the Finance Director, may compel the attendance of witnesses, the production of books, papers, records or memoranda, and the giving of testimony before the manager, by citation or capias, for contempt, or otherwise, in the same manner as production of evidence may be compelled before the court. 5.08.170 Depositions The Finance Director or any party in an investigation or hearing before the Finance Director may cause the deposition of witnesses residing within or without the state to be taken in the manner prescribed by law for like deposition in civil actions in courts of this state and to that end compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, records or memoranda. 5.08.180 Decisions of Finance Director; Notice; When Final Decisions of the Finance Director shall be final upon their entry and shall be mailed to the taxpayer forthwith. All notices or other information required to be given to the taxpayer in writing under the provisions of this article if mailed postpaid to the last known address of the taxpayer, after reasonable inquiry of such address, shall be deemed complete and effective upon and as of the posting of the same in the mails of the United States postal service unless returned within ten (10) days by the United States postal service to the manager. Filing by the taxpayer shall be deemed complete upon mailing to or personal service on the Finance Director. 5.08.190 Review of Finance Director's Decision in District Court A. The district court of the fifth judicial district of the state shall have original jurisdiction in proceedings to review all question of law and fact determined by the Finance Director in administering the provisions of this article by order or writ under Rule 106(a)(4) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. B. Before making application to the district court under Rule 106(a)(4) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, the party making such application shall file with the Finance Director a 8 . t. bond in twice the amount of the taxes, interest and other charges stated in the determination and decision of the f=inance Director with surety as is now provided in cases of attachment under the rules of civil procedure, or at the party's option may deposit lawful money of the United States in the same manner. C. Such writs or orders shall be issued by the clerk. of the court upon a verified petition or complaint of the taxpayer, filed within thirty (30) days after notice of the decision of the Finance Director. D. The procedure thereunder shall be in conformity with the rules of civil procedure of the state. 5.08.200 Jeopardy Assessment and Demands If the Finance Director finds that collection of the tax will be jeopardized by delay, in the Finance Director's discretion, the Finance Director may declare the taxable period immediately terminated, determine the tax, and issue notice and demand for payment thereof; and, having done so, the tax shall be due and payable forthwith, and the Finance Director may proceed immediately to collect such tax by distraint, levy and sale. Collection may be stayed if the taxpayer gives such security for payment as shall be satisfactory to the Finance Director. 5.08.210 Methods of Enforcing Collections A. If any taxes, penalty, or interest proposed by this article and shown due by returns filed by the taxpayer or shown by assessments duly made as provided herein are not paid within thirty (30) days after the same are due, the Director of Finance shall issue a notice setting forth the name of the taxpayer, the amount of the tax, penalties and interest, the date of the accrual thereof and that the Town claims a first and prior lien therefore on the real and tangible property of the taxpayer, except as to preexisting perfected liens of a mortgagee, pledgee, judgement creditor, or claims of a bona fide purchaser whose rights shall have attached tax prior to the filing of notice as herein provided on property of the taxpayer other than the goods, stock and trade and business fixtures of such taxpayer. Said notice shall be on forms furnished by the Finance Department and shall be verified by the Town Manager or by the Finance Director or any duly qualified agent of the Town Manager'or the Finance Director, whose duties are the collection of such tax, and may be filed in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of any county in the state in which the taxpayer owns real or tangible personal property, or, in the case of personalty, with the Secretary of State, and the filing of such notice shall create a lien on such property and constitute notice thereof. After such notice has been filed, or concurrently therewith, or at any 9 time when taxes due are unpaid, whether such notice shall have been filed or not, the Finance Director may issue a warrant directed to any duly authorized revenue collector, or to the Sheriff of the County commanding him to levy upon, distrain, seize, and sell sufficient of the real and personal property of the taxpayer found within the county for the payment of the amount due, together with interest, penalties, and costs as may be provided by law, subject to valid preexisting claims or liens. B. Such revenue collector or the Sheriff shall forthwith distrain and levy upon sufficient of the property of the taxpayer, or any property used by such taxpayer in conducting his business, and said property so levied upon shall be sold in all respects to and with like effect and in the same manner as is prescribed by law with respect to executions against property upon judgement of a court of record, and the remedies of garnishment shall apply. The Sheriff shall be entitled to such fees in executing such warrants as are allowed by law for similar services. C. Any lien for taxes is shown on the records of the County Clerk and Recorder as provided in this section, upon payment of all taxes, penalties, and interest covered thereby, shall be released by the Finance Director in the same manner as mortgages and judgements are released. D. The Finance Director may also treat any such taxes, penalties, or interest due and unpaid as debt due to the Town from the vendor or taxpayer. The return of the vendor or taxpayer or the assessment made by the Finance Director as provided in this chapter shall be prima facia proof of the amount due. To recover such taxes, penalties, or interest due the Finance Director may bring an action and a writ of attachment may be issued to the Sheriff. At any such proceedings, no bond shall be required of the Finance Director, nor shall any Sheriff require of the Finance Director an indemnifying bond for executing the writ of attachment or writ of execution upon any judgement entered in such proceedings. The Finance Director may prosecute appeals in such cases without the necessity of providing bond thereof. It is the duty of the Town Attorney, when requested by the Finance Director to commence action for the recovery of taxes due under this chapter and this remedy shall be in addition to all existing remedies provided in this chapter. E. In any action affecting the title to real estate or the ownership of rights to possession of personal property, the Town may be made a party defendant for the purposes of ' obtaining an adjudication or determination of its lien upon the property involved therein. In any such action, service of summons u on the Finance Director or any person in the office of the P 10 Finance Director shall be sufficient service and shall be binding upon the Town. F. The Finance Director is authorized to waive for good cause shown any penalty assessed as provided in this chapter and any interest imposed in excess of ten percent (10%) per annum. 5.08.220 Tax Lien A. The tax imposed by this chapter shall be a first and prior lien upon the goods and business fixtures of or used by any ski area operator or vendor, excepting stock of goods sold or for sale in the ordinary course of business, and shall take precedence on all such property over other liens or claims of any kind or nature whatsoever. B. Any ski area operator or vendor who sells his business or quits business shall be required to make out his tax return as provided for in this chapter within ten (10) days after the date the business is sold or the operator quits business, and his successor in business shall be required to withhold sufficient purchase money to cover the amount of said taxes due and unpaid until such time as the former owner produces a receipt from the Finance Director showing that the taxes have been paid or a certificate that no taxes are due. C. If the purchaser of a ski area fails to withhold the purchase money as provided in this section and the taxes are due and unpaid after the ten (10) day period, he as well as the seller shall be personally liable for the payment of the taxes unpaid by the former owner. 5.08.230 Status of Unpaid Tax in Bankruptcy and Receivership Whenever any vendor or taxpayer subject to this chapter shall be placed in receivership, bankruptcy, or assignment for the benefit of creditors, or seized under distraint for property taxes, all taxes, penalties, and interest imposed by this Chapter and for which the vendor or taxpayer is in any way liable under the terms of this chapter shall be a prior and preferred claim against all the property of said taxpayer, except as to preexisting claims or liens of a bona fide mortgagee, pledgee, judgement creditor, or purchaser whose rights shall have attached prior to the filing of the notice as provided for in section 5.08.090 of this chapter on the property of the taxpayer other than goods, stock and trade and business fixtures of such taxpayer. No Sheriff, receiver, assignee, or other officer shall sell the property of any person subject to this chapter under process or order of any court without first ascertaining from the Finance Director the amount of any taxes due and payable under this chapter and if there are any such taxes due, owing, or unpaid it is the duty of such officer to first pay the amount of said taxes out of the proceeds of said sale before making payment of any monies to any judgement creditor or other 11 claims of whatsoever kind or nature except the cost of the proceedings and other preexisting claims for liens as provided in this section: 5.08.250 Violation -Penalty Any person convicted of violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be punished by a fine not to exceed nine hundred ninety nine dollars ($999.00) or imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days or by both such fine and imprisonment. 5.08.260 Miscellaneous 1. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 2. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 3. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 4. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. 12 INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this day of , 1992, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk .READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C:~ORD92.54 13 e ~ ORDINANCE NO. 16 Sertes of 1992 AN ORDINANCE REZONING A PARCEL OF PROPERTY FROM PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION DISTRICT TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF VAIL ROAD AND WEST MEADOW DRIVE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A; AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP IN RELATION TO THE REZONING OF SAID PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the property to be rezoned is located within the municipal limits of tthe Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has considered the appropriate rezoning for the property and has unanimously recommended that the Town Council rezone the parcel from Public Accommodation to Public Use; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers it in the public interest to rezone said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Town Council finds that the procedures for the provision of rezoning property in the Town of Vail have been fulfilled, and the Town Council hereby received the report of recommendation from the Planning and Environmental Commission recommending the rezoning of said property. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 of the Vail Municipal Code, the parcel of property legally described in the attached Exhibit A is zoned as Public Use. Section 3. As provided in the ordinances of the Town of Vail, the zoning administrator is hereby directed to modify and amend the official zoning map to include the zoning specified in Section 2 above. Section 4 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this 1 ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5 The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 6 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under of by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 7 All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL, this day of , 1992. A public hearing shall be held hereon on the day of , 1992, at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado, in the Municipal Building of the Town. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 2 READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 3 , a _ EXHIBIT A. The site is located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A part of Lot "B", Amended Map of Vail Village, Second Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th P.M.: thence Southerly along the East Line of said Section 7 a distance of 390.78 ft; thence on an angle to the right of 90°00'00" a distance of 25.00 ft to a point on the East Line of said Lot "B", said point being 73.00 feet Northerly from the SE corner of said Lot "B" and the true point of beginning; thence continuing. along the aforesaid course a distance of 98.75 ft to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot "B", which is the Northeasterly line of W. Meadow Dr.; thence on an angle to the left . of 121°43'21" and along the curve to the right having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 02°06'21 and an arc distance of 6.43 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 33.97 ft to a point of curve; thence on a curve to the left having a radius of 75.00 ft and a central angle of 60°23'00" and an arc distance of 79.04 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a . distance of 13.48 ft to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "B", said corner being 25.00 ft Westerly of the East line of said Section 7; thence on an angle to the left of 90°00'00" and along the Easterly line of said Lot "B" and along a line parallel to the East line of said Section 7 a distance of 73.00 ft to the true point of beginning, more generally known as NW corner of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, Vail, Colorado. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: A request to rezone the "Ski Museum" pocket park site from Public Accommodation to Public Use District. The site is generally located. at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive.. (See attached legal Exhibit A). Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Mike Mollica I. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The Town of Vail is the owner of the property generally located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, commonly referred to as the Ski Museum Pocket Park site. This parcel was acquired from the Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company on June 25, 1975, with the condition that the property be used exclusively for a museum or other related public use for a period of twenty-five (25) years from the date of the deed. Up until the fall of 1991, the Town had been using this site for the. purposes of housing the Colorado Ski Museum. During the fall of 1991, the Colorado Ski Museum relocated to the Vail Village Transportation Center and the structure on the ski museum site has subsequently been demolished. The property is currently vacant and the Town's intentions are to construct a small pocket park in this location. The Ski Museum Pocket Park site is currently zoned Public Accommodation (PA). As stated in the Zoning Code, the Public Accommodation Zone District "is intended to provide sites for lodges and residential accommodations for visitors, together with such public and semipublic facilities and limited professional offices, medical facilities, private recreation,. and related visitor-oriented uses as may appropriately be located in the same district:" As .such, the PA District only allows for lodges, and accessory dining decks as permitted uses in the District. Conditional uses in the PA District range from professional and business offices, hospitals and dental clinics, to theaters, meeting rooms and convention facilities, and churches. Public parks and recreation facilities are also listed as conditional uses in the PA Zone District. The Town of Vail is requesting that the zoning on the ski museum site be changed from Public Accommodation to Public Use District (PUD). As stated iri the zoning code, the 1 a Public Use Zone District "is intended to ensure that public buildings and grounds and certain types of quasi-public uses permitted in the district are appropriately located and designed to meet the needs of residents and visitors to. Vail, to harmonize with surrounding uses, and in the case of buildings and other structures, to ensure adequate light, air, open space, and other amenities appropriate to the permitted types of uses." Public parks, playgrounds and open space, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and seasonal structures or uses to. accommodate educational, recreational, or cultural activities, are all permitted uses within the Public Use District. II. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Suitability of the Proposed Zoning. Although it is possible to request a conditional use permit to construct a pocket park on the ski museum site, given the Public Accommodation Zone District, it is the staff's opinion that the Public Use District is a much more appropriate zone district for the uses anticipated for this site. We believe that the proposed pocket park more closely meets the purpose section of the Public Use District, than the Public Accommodation Zone District. B. Is the amendment proposal presenting a convenient, workable relationship among land uses consistent with municipal objectives? The ski museum site has been specifically designated as a pocket park site in the recently approved Streetscape Master Plan. Preliminary design work for the pocket park is currently underway, and it is .anticipated that should this zoning change be approved, the pocket park would be constructed during the summer of 1992. The Town of Vail Land Use Plan has designated the ski museum site as a "transition zone". The Land Use Plan further defines a transition zone as an area in which "activities and site design are aimed at encouraging pedestrian flow through the area and strengthening the connection between the two commercial cores. Appropriate activities include hotels, lodging and other tourist oriented residential units, ancillary retail and restaurant uses, museums, areas of public art, natural exhibits, gardens, pedestrian plazas, and other types of civic and culturally oriented uses. The staff believes that the rezoning of this site from PA to Public Use District would be consistent with the zoning previously placed on Gerald R. Ford Park. Town parks are also zoned Agricultural/Open Space, and Greeenbelt Natural C}pen .Space. C. Does the rezoning proposal provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community? The staff feels that this proposed rezoning, and use of this site as a pocket park, would 2 provide for the growth of an orderly and viable community, and would also strengthen the pedestrian connection between the Village core and the Lionshead core. The Streetscape Master Plan addresses this site as follows: "A pocket pazk is proposed on the ski museum site, creating a sense of pedestrian entry for the corridor~and a better visual connection to East Meadow Drive. The park would include needed public restrooms, seating, and extensive landscaping." At this time, public restrooms are not included in the pazk design. If a restroom is . proposed in the future, it would require a conditional use review. The PUD allows for site specific review of development standards through the conditional use process. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendation for the proposed rezoning of this property from Public Accommodation to Public Use District is for approval. We believe that the Public Use District designation is the more appropriate zone district for the uses which aze anticipated for this property. We also believe that the addition of a pocket pazk on this site would be in conformance with the Town's Streetscape Master Plan, and that the pocket park would be a positive contribution to the community as a whole. 3 EXHIBIT A. The site is located at the northwest intersection of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, and more specifically described as follows: A part of Lot "B", Amended Map of Vail Village, Second Filing, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 7, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the 6th P.M.: thence Southerly along the East Line of said Section 7 a distance of 390.78 ft; thence on an angle to the right of 90°00'00" a distance of 25.00 ft to a point on the East Line of said Lot "B", said point being 73.00 feet Northerly from the SE corner of said Lot "B" and the true point of beginning; thence continuing along the aforesaid course a distance of 98.75 ft to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot "B", which is the Northeasterly line of W. Meadow Dr.; thence on an angle to the left of 121°43'21" and along the curve to the right having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 02°06'21 and an arc distance of 6.43 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 33.97 ft to a point of curve; thence on a curve to the left having a radius of 75.00 ft and a central angle of 60°23'00" and an arc distance of 79.04 ft to a point of tangent; thence continuing along said tangent a distance of 13.48 ft to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "B", said corner being 25.00 ft Westerly of the East line of said Section 7; thence on an angle to the left of 90°00'00" and along the Easterly line of said Lot "B" and along a line parallel to the East line of said Section 7 a distance of 73.00 ft to the true point of beginning, more generally known as, NW corner of Vail Road and West Meadow Drive, Vail,. Colorado. ' 4 TOWN OF VAIL BOUNDARY' MOUNTAIN BELL 160 149 ABC SCHOOL, i + LEARNING TREE 41N BELL RD. ~ 129 PARCEL B . ~ , SPRADDLE CREEK ~ p~ ~ RANCH 1 I I Y G 100 N. FRONTAGE RD. 7I 6 . ;2cLIPAD RESUBDNI~Q _ OF PART QF ~ . . LOT D, VAIL VIWaGE 2nd FILING OFFICE III I. i PO ICE & 1' 2 C; OWN OFFICES ~ MAIN VAIL I • ~ 75 EXIT E vAIL I ~ ' A-'L BAroK . ' , Z B0e I SCORPIO D I 121 HOLICAY INN HOJSE ALPHORN 13 STANDAR GATEwAr • I41 121 C I STA. I2 LOT 0 • • 2B DR A " 50 ~ I i C' ~ _LAGE 2nd ~0 sE sI VAILI VILLAGE INN 141 I EASTo W I 1 4 3142 122 2 I ~ ® I00 ROSSROADS ° -a TRANSPOR TION 162 B2 I 9 B > ARCADE P 4 ~W CENTE ~ 24I i a4 AIL P" NG FIRE • 15 EAST ME \ I M= ADOW CE °T + ADOW ~ F VAIL _ a? SONNENALP swiss ~ VILLAGE' MEAD`Ow TRACT B PL n G TALISMAN CHALET CENTER AUSTn~.. r. ® ~ f SONNENA~P 3 37 36 CORTIN BANK 6 2 ~ 120 O ~ 242 - r I BRA` C COVERED I53 123 22~ 17 ~ O `L I24 BRID~~STOR TRAC J BAVAPoIA REE - I 27 HAPEL 'MS R ER SE 6 m RE C+~t~lc 5B 1223 F • P 231,5 . 15a 28 0 19 B3 EDELw_. ~p P ~ L 84 31 TRACT 63 s~ 103 MC ITZMAR t~ER A / - I 26 29 ~ I "A 183 193 ~c 1~5 165 30 32 F pKP 43 ~ H 123 t f ' q U CASINO BLDG. II IER v t 250 I 115 95 WLLDW nn R V NRI - SB-198 RCAOE r F RE 33 34 a ILL 6 i c~c 225 m G PLAZA LODGE - ~ 196 I68o : 45 I5 35 44 B ~ 17 90 f33 Q1°~~ J~C ~ N 2BI-293 `IC'J 6 1a6 5 74 RIDGE S. A,B,C 174 TICKET OFFIC Ize 3 THE '~T v + z44 9 A B A 7 4 97 7 I VAIL ROAD ( I L B C 167 la7 127 1 ~ 2 ~ A 107 i nnrr mWcc ~ / BLOCK 20 ~ O PA ~ RESUB. LOT C . BLK. 5C / ~oeKe~ Pi~K ~'fe . ~9 ~ ~ . ~ All Tax-Exemat Town of Vail, Colorado Refunding of Series 1979 Bonds 10/01/91 Source of Funds: Par Amount of Refunding Bonds 8,355,000 Prem. on 2010 Terms ?,580,000 1.000% 75,800 Existing 1979 Fund Balances Liquidated 3,069,068 Total Sources 11,499,868 Use of Funds: Escrow to Call all 1979 Bonds 9,788,389 1991 Debt Service Reserve Fund 5.00 % 417,750 Special Cash Flow Reserve 400,000 Estimated Costs of Issuance 135,000 Estimated Underwriter's Discount 102,000 Cash Release to Town 656,729 Total Uses 11,499,868 Other Assumvtions: Loan Balance as of 10/01/91 7,568,103 Loan Evaporation - 20 % each year for 3 yrs 100% Recovered in 24 months with interest Loan Interest Rate 8.660% Remaining Term 219 Loan Age 141 Service Fee 0.375% Estimated Last Year PSA Prepayments 78.000% Trustee Fees & Misc. 0.100% Semi-annual in advance ($5,000 per year minimum) Pool & Special Hazard 0.180% Annually in advance Additonal Pool Insurance 0.350% Annually in advance Debt Service Reserve Investment Rate 6.000% Float Investment Rate 5.250% Bonds called from prepayments monthly after 1995 term called; $25,000 minimum Cash to Town at Closing 656,729 Present Value Residual at 78% PSA Prepayments 145,869 Total Cash and Residual 802,598 05!19192 WORST! Town of Vail, Colorado 1979 Fund Balances as of 10/1/91 10/01/91 Delivery Date Par Accrued Total Amount Rate Maturitv Price Amount Interest Proceeds Accumulation Reserve: Money Market 749,707 General Account Money Market 120,234 MortaaQe Reserve: Money Market 78 438 Principal Prepayment: Money Market 10,837 Principal Account: Money. Market 29 916 Capital Reserve: USTB 1,793,000 9.125% 05/15/09 110.75000 1,985,748 61,799 2,047,546 Cash 32,390 Total 1979 Fund Balances Liquidated 3,069,068 05/19/92 UNADJUSTED DEBT SERVICE 6Tovn of~Vail, Colorado Single Fam11y Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Series 1991 All Tax-Exempt PERIOD PRINCIPAL OVERLAPPING TOTAL BALANCE ENDING MATURITY RATE MATURITY RATE INTEREST DEBT SERVICE PAR AMOUNT ACCRETED VALUE 10/01/91 8,355,000.00 8,355,000.00 04/01/92 298,887.50 298,887.50 8,355,000.00 8,355,000.00 10/01/92 298,887.50 298,887.50 8,355,000.00 8,355,000.00 04/01/93 298,887.50 298,887.50 8,355,000.00 8,355,000.00 10)01/93 298,887.50 298,887.50 8,355,000.00 8,355,000.00 04/01/94 250,000.00 5.000 298,887.50 548,887.50 8,105,000.00 8,105,000.00 10/01/94 250,000.00 5.000 292,637.50 542,637.50 7,855,000.00 7,855,000.00 04/01/95 275,000.00 5.000 286,387.50 561,387.50 7,580,000.00 7,580,000.00 10/01/95 135,000.00 7.375 279,512.50 414,512.50 7,445,000.00 7,445,000.00 04/01/96 135,000.00 7.375 274,534.38 409,534.38 7,310,000.00 7,310,000.00 10/01/96 140,000.00 7.375 269,556.25 409,556.25 7,170,000.00 7,170,000.00 04/01/97 150,000.00 7.375 264,393.75 414,393.75 7,020,000.00 7,020,000.00 10/01/97 155,000.00 7.375 258,862.50 413,862.50 6,865,000.00 6,865,000.00 04/01/98 160,000.00 7.375 253,146.88 413,146.88 6,705,000.00 6,705,000.00 10/01/98 165,000.00 7.375 247,246.88 412,246.88 6,540,000.00 6,540,000.00 04(01/99 170,000.00 7.375 241,162.50 411,162.50 6,370,000.00 6,370,000.00 10/01/99 180,000.00 7.375 234,893.75 414,893.75 6,190,000.00 6,190,000.00 O4/O1/00 185,000.00 7.375 228,256.25 413,256.25 6,005,000.00 6,005,000.00 10/O1/00 190,000.00 7.375 221,434.38 411,434.38 5,815,000.00 5,815,000.00 04/01/01 200,000.00 7.375 214,428.13 414,428.13 5,615,000.00 5,615,000.00 10/O1/O1 210,000.00 7.375 207,053.13 417,053.13 5,405,000.00 5,405,000.00 04/01/02 215,000.00 7.375 199,309.38 414,309.38 5,190,000.00 5,190,000.00 10!01!02 225,000.00 7.375 191,381.25 416,381.25 4,965,000.00 4,965,000.00 04/01/03 230,000.00 7.375 183,084.38 413,084.38 4,735,000.00 4,735,000.00 10/01/03 240,000.00 7.375 174,603.13 414,603.13 4,495,000.00 4,495,000.00 04/01/04 250,000.00 7.375 165,753.13 415,753.13 4,245,000.00 4,245,000.00 10/01/04 260,000.00 7.375 156,534.38 416,534.38 3,985,000.00 3,985,000.00 04/01/05 270,000.00 7.375 146,946.88 416,946.88 3,715,000.00 3,715,000.00 10/O1/OS 280,000.00 7.375 136,990.63 416,990.63 3,435,000.00 3,435,000.00 04!01/06 290,000.00 7.375 126,665.63 416,665.63 3,145,000.00 3,145,000.00 10/01/06 305,000.00 7.375 115,971.88 420,971.88 2,840,000.00 2,840,000.00 04/01/07 315,000.00 7.375 104,725.00 419,725.00 2,525,000.00 2,525,000.00 10/01/07 330,000.00 7.375 93,109.38 423,109.38 2,195,000.00 2,195,000.00 O4/O1/OS 340,000.00 7.375 80,940.63 420,940.63 1,855,000.00 1,855,000.00 10/01/08 350,000.00 7.375 68,403.13 418,403.13 1,505,000.00 1,505,000.00 04/01/09 365,000.00 7.375 55,496.88 420,496.88 1,140,000.00 1,140,000.00 10/01/09 375,000.00 7.375 42,037.50 417,037.50 765,000.00 765,000.00 04/01/10 765,000.00 7.375 28,209.38 793,209.38 8,355,000.00 7,338,106.25 15,693,106.25 ACCRUED NET COST 8,355,000.00 7,338,106.25 15,693,106.25 PAR BOND YEARS BOND YEARS AVERAGE AVERAGE BOND NIC BOND NIC BOND BOND AMOUNT (FROM DATED) (FROM DELIVERY) COUPON LIFE (DATED) (DELIVERY) PRICE TIC Group 1 775,000.00 2,337.500 2,337.500 5.00000 3.01613 5.00000 5.00000 100.00000 5.00000 Group 2 7,580,000.00 97,915.000 97,915.000 7.3%SUC 12.91755 7.37500 7.37500 100.00000 7.37500 Aggregate 8,355,000.00 100,252.500 100,252.500 7.31962 11.99910 7.31962 7.31962 100.00000 7.29697 Date: 05/19/92 File: C:®VAIL®WORSTI.RV1 REVENUE REPORT _ Tovn of Vall, Colorado Single Family Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Series 1991 ' All Tnx-Exempt 78.OX PSA Prepayments ' $400,000 Supplemental Cash Flov Reserve - No Loan Loss ' REVENUES EXPENSES MANDATORY ARBITRAGE ---DISTRIBUTION OF EXCESS REVENUES ( -DEFICIT)-- ACQUISITION NET RESERVE TOTAL REDEM. FUND ACCOUNT EXCESS RESERV FUND EXTERNAL REDEM. FUND REVENUE PERIOD FUND LOAN FUND FLOAT GROSS DEBT PROGRAM TRANSFERS TRANSFERS REVENUES -TAPS DISTRIBUTN TRANSFERS FUND ENDING REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE INTEREST REVENUES SERVICE EXPENSES -RECEIPTS -RECEIPTS -DEFICIT REPLENSFR~4iT -RECEIPTS -RECEIPTS BALANCE 10/01/91 04/01/92 573,295 31,783 6,304 611,381 298,888 4,105 178,023 130,365 130,365 10/01/92 557,814 39,565 10,423 607,801 295,263 41,287 171,742 99,511 99,511 04/01/93 542,663 37,108 9,370 589,140 287,638 3,820 165,569 132,114 132,114 10/01/93 527,832 38,210 10,065 576,108 281,013 38,324 159,502 97,269 97,269 04/01/94 513,315 35,518 5,059 553,891 265,500 3,548 153,537 131,307 131,307 10/01/94 499,103 36,643 5,136 540,881 255,329 35,466 147,67.1 102,415 102,415 04/01/95 485,187 34,473 4,971 524,630 246,079 3,285 141,900 133,365 133,365 10101/95 471,560 40,605 4,976 517,141 361,154 32,646 136,222 -12,881 -12,881 04/01/96 458,214 33,793 4,432 496,438 356,413 2,973 130,634 6,419 6,419 10/01/96 445,142 434,668 4,409 884,218 341,733 29,952 125,133 387,401 387,401 04/01/97 432,337 39,005 5,837 477,179 315,499 2,530 119,714 34,436 39,436 10/01/97 419,791 21,340 4,301 445,432 303,177 27,258 114,377 620 620 04/01/98 407,498 18,678 4,063 430,238 294,357 2,500 109,118 24,263 24,263 10/01/98 395,450 19,083 4,104 418,636 280,261 24,967 103,934 9,474 9,474 04/01/99 383,641 17,715 3,891 405,247 271,719 2,500 98,822 32,207 32,207 10/01/99 372,064 18,128 3,876 394,068 257,807 22,738 93,780 19,742 19,742 04/01/00 360,713 16,768 3,716 381,196 249,510 2,500 88,805 40,381 40,381 10/O1/00 349,582 17,188 3,680 370,449 240,814 20,568 83,894 25,172 25,172 04(01/01 338,664 16,585 3,.539 358,788 247,702. 2,500 79,046 29,540 29,540 10/01(01 327,954 15,990 3,515 347,459 234,220 18,452 74,256 20,530 20,530 04/01/02 317,445 15,153 3,352 335,949 226,231 2.,500 69,524 37,694 37,694 10/01/02 307,132 15,830 3,407 326,369 218,088 16,385 64,846 27,050 27,050 04/01/03 297,009 12,728 3,240 312,976 205,190 2,500 60,221 45,065 45,065 10/01/03 287,070 14,458 3,308 304,835 197,323 14,363 55,645 37,504 37,504 04/01/04 277,311 13,378 3,154 293,843 189,580 2,500 51,116 50,.647 50,647 10/01/04 267,725 13,570 3,138 284,433 181,713 12,382 46,632 43,705 43,705 04/01/05 258,308 12,498 3,001 273,806 169,092 2,500 42,191 60,023 60,023 10/O1/05 249,054 12,698 3,001 264,753 156,410 10,438 37,791 60,113 60,113 04/01/06 239,959 11,883 2,935 254,777 148,973 2,500 33,429 69,874 69,874 10/01!06 231,017 11,833 2,948 245,797 136,445 8,528 29,103 71,721 71,721 04(01/07 222,224 9,525 2,852 234,600 119,039 2,500 24,812 88,250 88,.250 10/01/07 213,574 10,528 2,876 226,977 96,726 6,646 20,552 103,054 ~ 103,054 04/01/08 205,064 9,743 2,898 217,705 74,566 2,500 16,322 124,317 124,317 10/01!08 196,689 9,223 2,798 208,709 37,160 4,790 12,119 154,640 -7,000 34,290 127,351 04/01/09 188,443 188,443 188,443 188,443 10/01/09 180,324 180,324 456 179,868 179,868 04J01/10 87,155 87,155 87,155 87,155 12,887,317 1,135,883 148,572 14,171,772 7,840,608 413,407 3,039,982 2,877,774 -7,000 489,756 2,395,018 Date: 05/19/92 File: C:®VAIL®WORSTI.RV1 EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION REPORT _ as Town of Vail,aColorado~ Single Famlly Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Series 1991 , All Tax-Exempt 78.OX PSA Prepayments $400,000 Supplemental Cash Flow Reserve - No Loan Loss PERIOD PROGRAM OTHER OTHER LETTER OF ISSUED RESERVE FND TO OTHER FROM OTHER TOTAL ENDING DISTRZB. CASH FLOId EXPENSE CREDIT DEBT ADJUSTMENTS SERIES SERIES EXTERNAL 10/01/91 04/01/92 10/01/92 04/01/93 10/01/93 04/01/94 10/01/94 04/01/95 10!01/95 04/01/96 10/01/96 04/01/97 10/01/97 04/01/98 10/01/98 04/01/99 10/01/99 04/01/00 10/O1/00 04/01/01 10/O1/O1 04/01/02 10/01/02 04/01/03 10/01/03 04/01/04 10!01/04 04/01/05 10/01(05 04/01/06 10/01/06 04/01/07 10/01/07 04/01/08 10/01/08 34,290 34,290 04/01/09 188,443 188,443 10/01/09 179,868 179,868 04)01)10 87,155 87,155 489,756 489,756 PV PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION(S) TO DELIVERY @ 7.000X 145,869 Date: 05119/92 File: C:®VAIL®WORSTI.RV1 BALANCE REPORT ~ - Town of Vail, Colorado Single Family Mortggagge Refunding Bonds, Series 1991 ~ AL1 Tax-Exempt 78.OX PSA Prepayments $400,000 Supplemental Cash Flow Reserve - No Loan Loss ACQUISITION LOAN RESERVE REVENUE REDEMPTION AUXILLIARY BOND ACCRUED PERIOD FUND BALANCE FUNDS PARITY FUND FUND FUND ACCRUED TOTAL ACCRETED BOND ACCRUED TOTAL PARITY ENDING BALANCE (REP:S) (REP:7) ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE INTEREST ASSETS VALUE INTEREST EXPENSES LIABILITIES RATIO 10)01/91 7,568,103 817,750 8,385,853 8,355,000 8,355,000 100.369 04/01/92 7,303,823 810,500 163,389 8,277,712 8,210,000 8,210,000 100.825 10/01/92 7,044,154 795,250 129,641 7,969,045 7,905,000 7,905,000 100.810 04/01/93 6,788,955 782,000 162,324 7,733,279 7,640,000 7,640,000 101.221 10/01/93 6,538,088 767,250 124,095 7,429,433 7,345,000 7,345,000 101.150 04/01/94 6,291,416 754,750 158,939 7,205,105 7,095,000 7,095,000 101.552 10/01/94 6,048,808 740,750 129,025 6,918,582 6,815,000 6,815,000 101.520 04/01/95 5,810,131 728,500 159,290 6,697,921 6,570,000 6,570,000 101.947 10)01/95 5,575,258 709,750 32,631 6,317,639 6,195,000 6,195,000 101.980 04/01/96 5,344,063 697,250 49,684 6,090,998 5,945,000 5,945,000 102.456 10/01/96 5,116,423 283,500 412,218 5,812,141 5,670,000 5,670,000 102.507 04/01/97 4,892,215 253,000 81,368 5,226,584 5,060,000 5,060,000 103.292 10/01/97 4,671,322 239,250 41,365 4,951,937 4,785,000 4,785,000 103.489 04/01/98 4,453,625 227,750 64,746 4,746,121 4,555,000 4,555,000 104.196 10/01/98 4,239,010 215,500 48,154 4,502,664 4,310,000 4,310,000 104.470 04/01/99 4,027,363 204,250 69,182 4,300,795 4,085,000 4,085,000 105.283 10/01/99 3,818,574 192,250 52,704 4,063,528 3,845,000 3,845,000 105.683 04/01/00 3,612,532 181,250 71,890 3,865,673 3,625,000 3,625,000 106.639 10/O1/00 3,409,131 169,500 55,957 3,634,588 3,390,000 3,390,000 107.215 04/01/01 3,208,264 158,000 59,543 3.,425.,807 3,160,000 3,160,000 108.412 10/01/01 3,009,828 146,750 49,329 3,205,907 2,935,000 2,935,000 109.230 04)01/02 2,813,719 136,000 61,547 3,011,266 2,720,000 2,720,000 110.708 10/01/02 2,619,837 124,250 38,443 2,782,530 2,485,000 2,485,000 111.973 04/01/03 2,428,082 115,250' 78,729 2,622,061 2,305,000 2,305,000 113.755 10/01/03 2,238,355 104,250 66,878 2,409,483 2,085,000 2,085,000 115.563 04/01/04 2,050,561 94,000 78,640 2,223,202 1,880,000 1,880,000 118.255 10/01/04 1,864,604 83,250 68,978 2,016,832 1,665,000 1,665,000 121.131 04/01/05 1,680,390 73,250 81,192 1,834,832 1,465,000 1,465,000 125.245 10/O1/OS 1,497,826 62,750 74,096 1,634,672 1,255,000 1,255,000 130.253 04/01/06 1,316,820 52,750 82,399 1,451,970 1,055,000 1,055,000 137.627 10/01/06 1,137,283 42,500 78,224 1,258,007 850,000 850,000 148.001 04/01/07 959,124 34,250 116,286 1,104,660 685,000 685,000 161.994 10(01/07 782,256 24,750 124,891 931,897 495,000 495,000 188.262 04/01/08 606,591 15,750 145,530 767,871 315,000 315,000 243.769 10/01/08 432,042 432,042 04/01)09 258,526 258,526 10/01/09 85,956 85,956 04/01/10 Date: 05/19/92 File: C:®VAIL®WORSTI.RV1 ADJUSTED DEBT SERVICE REPORT Tocm of Vail Colorado= 3 S1ng1e Famlly Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Serles 1991 ALL Tax-Exempt 78.OX PSA Prepayments $400,000 Supplemental Cash Flov Reserve - No Loan Loss SCHEDULED DEBT SERVICE REDEEMED DEBT SERVICE PERIOD PRINCIPAL TOTAL INTEREST-BEARING NON INTEREST-BEARING TOTAL PASS TOTAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE - ENDING MATURITIES INTEREST SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST REDEEMED THROUGH DEBT SERV. PAR AMOUNT ACCRET. VAL 10/01/91 8,355,000 8,355,000 04/01/92 298,868 298,888 145,000 145,000 443,888 8,210,000 8,210,000 10/01/92 295,263 295,263 305,000 305,000 600,263 7,905,000 7,905,000 04/01/93 287,638 287,638 265,000 265,000 552,638 7,640,,000 7,640,000 10/01/93 281,013 281,013 295,000 295,000 576,013 7,345,000 7 345,000 04/01/94 262,550 262,550 250,000 2,950 252,950 515,500 7,095,000 7;095,000 10/O1J94 252,225 252,225 280,000 3,104 283,104 535,329 6,815,000 6,815,000 04/01/95 243,928 243,928 245,000 2,151 247,151 491,079 6,.570,000 6,570,000 10/01/95 125,000 233,050 358,050 250,000 3,104 253,104 611,154 6,195,000 6,195,000 04/01/96 130,000 224,016 354,016 120,000 2,397 122,397 476,413 5,945,000 5,945,000 10/01/96 125,000 215,166 340,166 150,000 1,567 151,567 491,733 5,670,000 5,670,000 04/01/97 120,000 191,013 311,013 490,000 4,486 494,486 805,499 5,060,000 5,060,000 10/01/97 120,000 160,872 300,872 155,000 2,305 157,305 458,177 4,785,000 4,785,000 04/01/98 120,000 172,391 292,391 110,000 1,967 111,967 404,357 4,555,000 4,555,,000 10/01/98 115,000 163,172 278,172 130,000 2,090 132,090 410,261 4,310,000 4,310,000 04/01/99 115,000 154,875 269,875 110,000 1,844' 111,844 381,719 4,.085,000 4,085,000 10/01/99 110,000 145,841 255,841 130,000 1,967 131,967 387,807 3,845,000 3,845,000 04/01/00 110,000 137,728 247,728 110,000 1,782 111,782 359,510 3,625,000 3,625,000 10/O1/00 110,000 129,063 239,063 125,000 1,752 126,752 365,814 3,390.,000 3,390,000 04j01/O1 125,000 121,134 246.,134 105,000 1,567 106,567 352,702 3,160,000 3,160,000 10/O1/O1 120,000 112,653 232,653 105,000 1,567 106,567 339,220 2,935,000 2,935,000 04/01/02 120,000 104,725 224,725 95,000 1,506 96,506 321,231 2,720,000 2,720,000 10/O1/02 120,000 96;981 216,981 115,000 1,106 116,106 333,088 2,485,000 2,485,000 04/01/03 115,000 89,238 204,238 65,000 953 65,953 270,190 2,305,000 2,305,000 10/01/03 115,000 81,125 196,125. 105,000 1,198 106,198 302,323 2,085,000 2,085,000 04/01/04 115,000 73,566 188,566 90,000 1,014 91,014 279,580 1,880,000 1,880,000 10/01/04 115,000 65,638 180,638 .100,000 1,076 101,076 281,713 1,665,000 1,665,000 04/01/05 110,000 58,078 168,078 90,000 1,014 91,014 259,092 1,465,000 1,465,000 10/01/05 105,000 50,150 155,150 105,000 1,260 106,260 261,410 1,255,000 1,255,OOOr 04J01/06 105,000 42,775 147,775 95,000 1,198 96,198 243,973 1,055,000 1,055,000 10/01/06 100,000 35,953 135,953 105,000 492 105,492 241,445 850,000 850,000 04/01/07 90,000 28,578 118,578 75,000 461 75,461 194,039 685,000 685,000 10/01/07 75,000 21,019 96,019 115,000 707 115,707 211,726 495,000 495,000 04/01/08 60,000 13,828 73,.828 120,000 737 120,738 194,566 315,000 315,000 04J01%09 30,000 6,269 36,269 285,000 891 285,891 322,160 140,000 10/01/09 04J01/10 2,920,000 4,870,397 7,790,397 5,435,000 50,211 5,485,211 13,275,608 ACCRUED NET COST 2,920,000 4,870,397 7,790,397 PAR BOND YEARS BOND YEARS AVERAGE AVERAGE BOND NIC BOND NIC BOND BOND AMOUNT (FROM DATED) (FROM DELIVERY) COUPON LIFE (DATED) (DELIVERY) PRICE TIC Group 1 775,000.00 895.000 895.000 5.00000 1.15484 5.00000 5.00000 100.00000 5.00000 Group 2 7,580,000.00 66,.113.333 66,113.333 7.37500 8.72208 7.37500 7.37500 100.00000 7.37558 Aggregate 8,355,000.00 67,008.333 67,008.333 7.34328 8.02015 7.34326 7.34328 100.00000 7.33245 Date: 05/19/92 File: C:~VAIL®41ORST1.RV1 5 ~ ti yr TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 1992 PROPOSED TIME SCHEDULE PERSON DATE ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBLE Tuesday, May 19 Council Direction to Proceed VC with Proposed Refunding Wednesday, May 20 Documentation Begun on Financing BC,DC,GKB,VF Documents -Bond Documents, POS, Bond Rating Package Friday, May 29 First Draft of Financing Documents BC,DC Distributed Wednesday, June 3 ~ Comments Due on First Draft of VF,VA,GKB Financing Documents Monday, June 8 Second Draft of Financing Documents BC,DC Distributed Wednesday, June 10 Mail Financing Documents to Rating GKB Agency Tuesday, June 16 Adoption of Resolution of Conditional VC Call on Series 1979 Bonds First Reading of Bond Ordinance VC Tuesday, June 23 Worksession on Preliminary Bond Pricing VC,VF,GKB Thursday, June 25 Receive Bond Rating GKB Print Preliminary Official Statement Friday, June 26 Mail Preliminary Official Statement GKB Monday, June 29 Offer Bonds GKB Tuesday, June 30 Second Reading of Bond Ordinance VC Friday, July 3 Publication of Bond Ordinance VF TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 1992 PROPOSED TIME SCHEDULE PERSON DATE ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBLE Thursday, July 2 Documentation Begun on Closing BC,DC Documents Monday, July ]3 First Drafts of Bond Closing Documents BC,DC Distributed Tuesday, July 14 Print Final Official Statement GKB Monday, July 20 Comments Due Back on Bond Closing VA,VF,GKB Documents Wednesday, July 29 Pre-Closing of Bond Issue VA,VF,VC,GKB Thursday, July 30 Bond Closing ~ VA,VF,VC,GKB BC -Bond Counsel DC -Disclosure Counsel VA -Vail Town Attorney VC -Vail Town Council VF -Vail Town Finance GKB -George K. Baum ~'~~~Is WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP May 15, 1992 Page 1 of 3 TOPIC QUESTIONS ~ FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 05107 SKI AREA ADMISSION TAX LARRYISTEVE: Research remedies to change this to Draft ordinance forwarded to Forest Service and VA for (request: Gibson/Lapin) a mandatory TOV tax collection. review. Forest Service response unclear. Ron has discussed with Jerry Oliver, who will now discuss the issue with George Gillett. Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1992, tabled for first reading to 5119/92. 11119 NEWSPAPER VENDING LARRY/ANDY/MIKE M.: What can be done to make Discussions have begun with vendors. Voluntary MACHINES these uniform and locations less prolific? agreement still being pursued. 1992 01121 EVENING PARKING MIKE ROSE/STEVE B.: Evaluate financial Mike will prepare new analysis of data prior to the STRUCTURE FEES ramifications of eliminating parking structure fees beginning of the budget-setting process in September. (request: Lapin) after 6:00 p.m. each night. Staff to explore other options. 01/21 BEAVER POND KRISTAN: Check with FEMA experts and Interfleuve, Three reports received from Interfleuve, Hydrosphere, ~ REVITALIZATION Hydrosphere, and Wetland Aquatics to see what solution and Wetland Aquatics will be analyzed by Community what might be appropriate to revitalize this pond Development and Todd 0. and then presented to (i.e., dredging or other means). Council at 619/92 work session. The beaver are back! Update to follow. 02104 HERITAGE CABLEVISION CAROLINE: Prepare new letter of protest for Mayor's Will do upon return of Merv. FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS signature. XC: Newspapers, Dillon, Minturn, etc. (request: Lapin) 02111 HORSEDRAWN CARRIAGE KEN/LARRY; Prepare extension to agreement, Advisory Committee to help draft standards of AGREEMENT including possible provisions for hobbling, dragging operations and other criteria. Draft contract weights, and other options. to be presented to Council at 5126192 work session. Dave Sloan, Carriage Rides, Inc., is currently not doing business. r , WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP May 15, 1992 Page 2 of 3 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 02/17 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTAN/ANDY: Draft ordinance. Input received and joint discussions will continue including all interested parties. Initial meetings held with night tour scheduled for 612/92 evening meeting. 03/10 AFFORDABLE HOUSING KRISTAN/LARRY: Finalize ordinance. Ord. No. 9, Series of 1992, to Council for first PROVISIONS ORDINANCE reading on 612/92. 03/10 LIONSHEAD SALES TAX FIGURES STEVE B./STEVE T.: Packy Walker, on behalf of the Will investigate. Staff time now being spent on special (request: Osterfoss, Levine, LH Merchants Assn., is requesting an accounting of events/daily sales tax reporting program. Staff will Gibson, Steinberg) sales tax taken from a square footage basis, standard attempt to meet these other concerns after completion number (such as Dow Jones) of businesses reporting, to of the special events program. offer a comparative analysis. 03/17 GOAL SHARING SESSION COUNCIL: Carl Neu will be facilitating agoal-sharing Everyone is attending. session to include the Avon Town Council, Eagle County Commissioners, and Vail Town Council. Tuesday, June 22, 1992, from, 2:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., is the newly scheduled date. Please mark your calendars. 04/07 REVIEW RETT LARRY: Schedule for Council review. Staff will work with parties-of-interest to further work out revisions and suggestions from 4121/92 work session. Public airing to be called. 04107 USE TAX ON CONSTRUCTION LARRY: Prepare ordinance for implementation January Scheduled for 612/92 evening meeting as an ordinance MATERIALS 1, 1993. for first reading. WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP May 15, 1992 Page 3 of 3 ! TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 04/14 SPRING VACATION COUNCIL: At your earliest convenience, please let Jim Gibson will be out 519-28/92. SCHEDULES either dd or Pam know of any vacation plans that will take you away from regularly scheduled meetings. We ask for this at this time of year to ensure a quorum for scheduled items. 04/14 CML SUMMER COUNCIL: The annual conference is scheduled for Those signed up are as follows: Tom, Rob, CONFERENCE the week of 6/16-20 in Fort Collins. Peggy, Jim S., and Ron. 04/21 ADDITIONAL AMPLIFICATION LEO VASQUEZ: With new work session arrangement, Will do. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS can we hang ceiling microphones to increase voice coverage? 05/07 CONSOLIDATION OF MARTHA: Contact special districts in our area Martha will draft letters to be sent to the new POLLING PRECINCTS FOR to offer the TOV Municipal Building as an President of each special district to offer this SPECIAL DISTRICT ELECTIONS optimal, accessible polling site for future location. (request: Lapin) elections.