Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-01 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session J VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 7:30 P.M. REVISED AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 4, 1992, and August 18, 1992 Regular Evening Meetings, and August 20, 1992, Special Evening Meeting Minutes. 3. Request for $1,000 Contribution to Victims of Hurricane Andrew in Miami Beach, Florida. 4. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance creating a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18.14, 18.16, 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, and 18.39 to provide for the addition of employee housing units as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.4, setting forth certain definitions for an employee housing unit, a bathroom, and a kitchenette. 5. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance authorizing and directing acquisition of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance by reference, for bike path purposes by negotiation if possible, and if negotiation is not successful in obtaining the property, by eminent domain proceedings. 6. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance authorizing and directing acquisition of drainage easements over, across, and under certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for public drainage purposes by negotiation, and, if negotiation is unsuccessful, by eminent domain proceedings. 7. Presentation: Safety Option Recommendations for Access to Bus Stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD Proposed Par 3 Golf Course. 8. Discussion Re: Capital Projects and Future Debt Service Levels. 9. Adjournment. 4444444444444444444444 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 4444444444444444444444 C:VIGENDA.TC ~f VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS REVISED EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 4, 1992, and August 18, 1992, Regular Evening Meetings, and August 20, 1992, Special Evening Meeting Minutes. 7:40 P.M. 3. Request for $1,000 contribution to victims of Hurricane Andrew in Ron Phillips Miami Beach, Florida. Backaround Rationale: At a joint regional meeting on Wednesday, 8/26/92, the municipalities of Eagle County, including the towns of Vail, Avon, Eagle, Minturn, Gypsum, Redcliff, and Eagle County, agreed to initiate an assistance program to the residents of Florida cities ravaged by Hurricane Andrew. Bill James, Avon's Town Manager, placed a call to the Florida Municipal League, which assigned the City of Miami Beach as a sister city to the Eagle County municipalities to whom relief efforts should be addressed. Bank accounts will be opened at all First Bank Branches in Vail, Avon, and Minturn to receive contributions. (Make checks payable to the City of Miami Beach.) 7:45 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance Andy Knudtsen creating a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18.14, 18,16, 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, and 18.39 to provide for the addition of employee housing units as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.4, setting forth certain definitions for an employee housing unit, a bathroom, and a kitchenette. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, on second reading. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, on second reading. 8:15 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Grafel authorizing and directing acquisition of certain property more Greg Hall particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part Larry Eskwith of this ordinance by reference, for bike path purposes by negotiation if possible, and if negotiation is not successful in obtaining the property, by eminent domain proceedings. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992. 1 Backaround Rationale: Authorize staff to negotiate for the purchase of land needed for the Dowd Junction Bike Path, and Start condemnation proceedings where necessary. 8:25 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Grafel authorizing and directing acquisition of drainage easements over, across, and under certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for public drainage purposes by negotiation, and, if negotiation is unsuccessful, by eminent domain proceedings. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992. Backaround Rationale: Authorize staff to negotiate for the purchase of land needed for drainage easements (including property owned by Kent Rose), and start condemnation proceedings where necessary. 8:35 P.M. 7. Presentation: Safety option recommendations for access to bus Larry Grafel stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD proposed Par Mike Rose 3 Golf Course. Mike Mollica Action Reauested of Council: Approve/disapprove/modify the safety recommendation options presented by Public Works. Backaround Rationale: Council directed staff to resolve safety issues at bus stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD proposed Par 3 Golf Course. 8:55 P.M. 8. Discussion re: Capital projects and future debt service levels. Steve Barwick Steve Thompson Action Reauested of Council: Specify desired future debt service level. Backaround Rationale: The Town is deciding upon future debt service levels to be included in the refunding of existing debt. Staff needs direction on which capital projects should be funded in future years. 9:25 P.M. 9. Adjournment. 4444444444444444444444 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 918/92, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 4444444444444444044444 C:IAGENDA.TCE 2 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 4, 1992, and August 18, 1992 Regular Evening Meetings, and August 20, 1992, Special Evening Meeting Minutes. 3. Request for $1,000 Contribution to Victims of Hurricane Andrew in Miami Beach, Florida. 4. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance creating a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18.14, 18.16, 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, and 18.39 to provide for the addition of employee housing units as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.4, setting forth certain definitions for an employee housing unit, a bathroom, and a kitchenette. 5. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance authorizing and directing acquisition of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance by reference, for bike path purposes by negotiation if possible, and if negotiation is not successful in obtaining the property, by eminent domain proceedings. 6. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance authorizing and directing acquisition of drainage easements over, across, and under certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for public drainage purposes by negotiation, and, if negotiation is unsuccessful, by eminent domain proceedings. 7. Presentation: Safety Option Recommendations for Access to Bus Stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD Proposed Par 3 Golf Course 8. Adjournment. 4444444444444444444400 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 0444444400444444444444 C:WGENDA.TC VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 4, 1992, and August 18, 1992, Regular Evening Meetings, and August 20, 1992, Special Evening Meeting Minutes. 7:40 P.M. 3. Request for $1,000 contribution to victims of Hurricane Andrew in Ron Phillips Miami Beach, Florida. Backaround Rationale: At a joint regional meeting on Wednesday, 8/26/92, the municipalities of Eagle County, including the towns of Vail, Avon, Eagle, Minturn, Gypsum, Redcliff, and Eagle County, agreed to initiate an assistance program to the residents of Florida cities ravaged by Hurricane Andrew. Bill James, Avon's Town Manager, placed a call to the Florida Municipal League, which assigned the City of Miami Beach as a sister city to the Eagle County municipalities to whom relief efforts should be addressed. Bank accounts will be opened at all First Bank Branches in Vail, Avon, and Minturn to receive contributions. (Make checks payable to the City of Miami Beach.) 7:45 P.M. 4. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance Andy Knudtsen creating a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18.14, 18.16, 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, and 18.39 to provide for the addition of employee housing units as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.4, setting forth certain definitions for an employee housing unit, a bathroom, and a kitchenette. Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, on second reading. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, on second reading. 8:15 P.M. 5. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Grafel authorizing and directing acquisition of certain property more Greg Hall particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part Larry Eskwith of this ordinance by reference, for bike path purposes by negotiation if possible, and if negotiation is not successful in obtaining the property, by eminent domain proceedings. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/mafify Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992. 1 Backaround Rationale: Authorize staff to negotiate for the purchase of land needed for the Dowd Junction Bike Path, and Start condemnation proceedings where necessary. 8:25 P.M. 6. Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance Larry Grafel authorizing and directing acquisition of drainage easements over, across, and under certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for public drainage purposes by negotiation, and, if negotiation is unsuccessful, by eminent domain proceedings. Action Requested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 22, Series of 1992. Backaround Rationale: Authorize staff to negotiate for the purchase of land needed for drainage easements (including property owned by Kent Rose), and start condemnation proceedings where necessary. 8:35 P.M. 7. Presentation: Safety option recommendations for access to bus Larry Grafel stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD proposed Par Mike Rose 3 Golf Course. Mike Mollica Action Requested of Council: Approve/disapprove/modify the safety recommendation options presented by Public Works. Backaround Rationale: Council directed staff to resolve safety issues at bus stops on Bald Mountain Road in regard to the VRD proposed Par 3 Golf Course. 8:55 P.M. 8. Adjournment. ~pOOOpe}Op4OdOOO~P4OdO4 THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 12:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 9/8/92, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 4OOOOOOO4OOCO4O4O4O~OO C:WGENDA.TCE 2 r 1 MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 4, 1992 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail T~w~~ Council was held on Tuesday, August 4, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Jim Gibson Rob Levine Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg MEMBERS ABSENT: Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Buckley TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Martha Raecker, Town Clerk The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Kim Langmaid, Tim Luskow, Pat McIlveen, Evie Nott, and Paul Rondeau voiced mutual concerns about the Par 3 Golf Course/Booth Creek development. They each felt there was a lack of public knowledge about the issue, and requested acommunity-wide public hearing and review of the issue. Mayor Osterfoss stated there had been ample public process, but Council agreed to schedule a final joint CounciUVail Recreation District (VRD) public meeting to receive additional public input. Hermann Staufer agreed to work with Ron Phillips and the VRD to organize a public meeting to be held after the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) public meeting scheduled for August 10, 1992. Larry Eskwith advised there would not be a problem with delaying execution of the lease with the VRD on the project until after the final public hearing and review. Next, Diana Donovan expressed concern about the condition of the road between Gold Peak and the soccer field. Peggy Osterfoss advised funds for improvements to that road were in the budget. Lastly, Josef Staufer asked for an update on the Vail cemetery issue. Kristan Pritz inf„...~ed Mr. Staufer candidates had been interviewed for re-activation of the Cemetery Task Force. Paul Rondeau noted he had reviewed the Cemetery RFP, and felt the RFP should have been more concise in stating overall objectives. Peggy Osterfoss encouraged Mr. Rondeau to speak further with Kristan about participating on the Cemetery Task Force. Item No. 2 was a Consent Agenda consisting of three items: A. Ap~,~.. gal of July 7, 1992, and July 21, 1992, Evening Meeting Minutes. B. Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance amending Chapter 18.24 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail by the addition of Section 18.24.058, controlling undesirable plants within the Town, declaring such plants a nuisance, setting forth penalties for the violation of this ordinance; and setting forth details in regard thereto. C. Ordinance No. 18, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance amending Section G of the Vail Village urban design considerations relating to the protection of views within the T.,~~u of Vail and creating a new chapter of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail to provide for the protection of certain views within the T~ W u and setting forth the details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the titles in full. Tom Steinberg requested item B, Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1992, be removed from the Consent Agenda for additional discussion. Jim Gibson then moved to approve Consent Agenda items A and C, with a second Tom Steinberg. 1 A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Discussion of item B, Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1992, followed. Larry Eskwith noted the potential jail penalty for violation of this ordinance, and the inclusion of Russian and Canadian Thistles as undesirable plants had been deleted from this ordinance since first reading. He suggested the request from Council to include a public education program as part of this ordinance be taken care of separately by the Public Works Department through announcements, meetings, and a photo campaign. Todd Oppenheimer stated the purpose of this ordinance was to fulfill a State mandate, part of which required an educational program as part of an integrated weed control management plan. Todd indicated the educational program was something he could organize. Flo Steinberg initiated discussion regarding environmental hazards related to chemical spraying of weeds. Peggy Osterfoss explained the weeds named in this ordinance had very negative potential with regard to agriculture, and added that was the reason the State had asked TOV to cooperate with removal of them. She specified this ordinance had nothing to do with chemical spraying of weeds or any policy of how weed control was accomplished. Flo agreed, but noted TOV had been spraying for years, and was concerned spraying would continue without question. She felt Council should consider that issue. Nancy Rondeau, volunteer coordinator at the Vail Alpine Garden, also e~.N~ messed concern about chemical spraying in Town. She felt the chain reaction after use of these chemicals was not fully understood. Rob Levine agreed, but repeated Peggy's note that spraying control was not the intention of this ordinance, and added this ordinance clearly indicated removal of the four specified weeds was to be accomplished in an "ecologically feasible and environmentally safe manner." Council agreed the issue of chemical spraying should be an issue to be addressed separately. Peggy asked Todd to prepare a report on TOV weed control practices for discussion as a separate issue at a work session. Hermann Staufer wondered if Council had considered the TOV as the biggest land.,~uers in the Valley, and asked if TOV would have to hire someone to make sure the weeds were removed from all TOV property. Tom Steinberg noted this was a State mandate without any funding source, and felt the only reason it was in place was for the agricultural interests. He expressed desire to challenge the State on it. Rob Levine agreed the agricultural community was asking for cooperation, but felt the tourism based economy may need cooperation fly.,, other parts of the state at some point. He felt cooperation and working together within reason was appropriate. Jim Shearer agreed with Rob, and felt if TOV was responsible with its eradication methods, this ordinance should be passed. Jim Gibson felt cooperation with the State was in order because the issue of the four weeds in the ordinance had presented problems elsewhere. Peggy felt when TOV could cooperate with the State, she was in favor. Jim Gibson then moved to approve Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1992, on second reading, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-1, Tom Steinberg opposed. Peggy noted the public education program, weed control, chemical spraying and fertilizer use reports to be organized by Todd were awaited. Item No. 3 was Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance amending Section 16.24.010(G) of the Vail Municipal Code, setting forth provisions relating to signs displayed on balloons which are associated with a special event within the Town of Vail. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Tim Devlin briefly reviewed the revisions to this ordinance since first reading. Peggy noted that following a discussion of this ordinance, the next agenda item was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992, an emergency ordinance setting forth a special review process to allow for staff approvals for temporary signage, structures, street decor, and other temporary improvements for the 1992 Mountain Bike World Cup Finals. Ron Phillips suggested both ordinances be discussed simultaneously. He explained there had been considerable concern expressed by a number of people in the community about Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, and, therefore, emergency Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992, had been proposed for consideration as an option to Ordinance No. 20. He noted Ordinance No. 21 was patterned after an emergency ordinance adopted by Council in 1988 to allow for this same procedure to take place for the 1989 World Alpine Ski Championships in Vail. Peggy explained Ordinance No. 20 would allow cold air balloons in a fairly controlled setting on an ongoing basis in conjunction with special events, whereas Ordinance No. 21, would allow cold air balloons in conjunction with one upcoming event scheduled for September 3-7, 1992, Labor Day weekend. Ron said, after having met with John Garnsey of the Vail Valley Foundation (VVF), substituting a comr~......ise would be appropriate as an emergency at this point, due to the time frame involved with a second reading. Discussion followed about the nature of cold air balloons and their place in Vail. John Garnsey said the VVF was philosophically in agreement with Council regarding cold air balloons. However, he advised for this particular event, three sponsors representing $30,000 toward this event, would not support this event if they could not use this form of advertising. He said the VVF resisted, 2 I but, based on what the VVF perceived as minor opposition to Ordinance No. 20,1992, which passed on first reading, the sponsors signed agreements to participate. Mr. Garnsey said the VVF did not have the capability to find replacements for these sponsors if they pulled out, and subsequently, the loss of $30,000 for the event, and possibly loss of the event was there. The VVF now asked Council for help because of the predicament the WF was in. Josef Staufer, Eric Affeldt, Jim Lamont, and Hermann Staufer spoke against allowing the cold air balloons. Further, Mr. Staufer did not feel emergency ordinances were designed for this type of circumstance. Pat McIlveen, professional mountain biker, stated there had been cold air balloons, hot air balloons, banners, and all different types of signage as part of races he had participated in, and he felt all of these forms of advertising were part of the excitement of the events. After Council members voiced further individual feelings regarding Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, Tom Steinberg moved to deny Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, on second reading, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-1, Rob Levine opposed. Further discussion followed about Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992. Jim Gibson felt an emergency ordinance should be a very rare occurrence for something very crucial to the Town and the citizenry of Vail. Tom Steinberg agreed. They felt this was a misuse of emergency ordinance rulings. Peggy said there was Council consensus for approaching this as a regular ordinance rather than an emergency ordinance. Discussion of Ordinance No. 21 as a regular ordinance allowing cold air balloons for this single event culminated in a motion by Jim Shearer to approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992, on first reading, as a regular ordinance with the inclusion of the cold air balloon limitations previously incorporated into Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, before it was denied on second .reading. Rob Levine seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-1, Jim Gibson opposed. Peggy added, because TOV was working with the VVF, and because Council had passed Ordinance No. 20 on first reading, it would be appropriate to support the cold air balloons for this specific event. Item No. 5 was Resolution No. 13, Series of 1992, a resolution authorizing the T..~~u of Vail to hire certain consultants to provide expert advice to the Town for the purpose of protecting the Town's interest in the proper operation and management of Vail Associates, Inc. (VA.) Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. She explained the future success of VA was inextricably connected to the future success of Vail, and TOV felt it was important for the Town to be kept informed of the options for working with VA to further the interest of all community members by fulfilling TOV's fiduciary responsibility to the community. She strongly emphasized this resolution in no way indicated any decision or predisposition. Jim Gibson moved to apr~~~e Resolution No. 13, Series of 1992, with a second from Jim Shearer. Before a vote was taken, Eric Affeldt asked whether a dollar limitation had been set for the cost of this research. He also asked what had been spent to date. Larry Eskwith said approximately fifteen thousand dollars had been paid to Kutak Rock for monitoring the GHI bankruptcy proceedings. Joe Macy also inquired about the cost. Larry indicated potential cost was dependent on actual tasks to be accomplished, and Ron Phillips noted potential cost for this work had been discussed in Executive Session. Peggy advised estimated potential costs ranged from $25,000 to $50,000. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Item No. 6 was Resolution No. 15, Series of 1992, a resolution recognizing Madame Sophia Golovkina as an honorary citizen of the T„~~ of Vail. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim Gibson moved to approve Resolution No. 15, Series of 1992, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Item No. 7 was selection of an underwriter for the planned refunding of some of the Town's existing debt issues. Steve Barwick noted Hanifen Imhoff had been hired by TOV as financial advisor to evaluate proposals from underwriters. Steve introduced Nate Eckloff, Senior Vice President of the investment banking firm, Hanifen, Imhoff, Inc. Mr. Eckloff explained a memo from his firm to Council dated August 4, 1992, regarding their evaluation of proposals to refund the Town's sales tax revenue bonds. He detailed the background, methodology, and analysis procedure of the r~.,~,osals received. He explained his firm's recommendation to combine Kemper Securities as senior managing under ~~,.~ter and George K. Baum as co-manager. Steve said negotiations had been conducted with both firms, and an agreement had been reached on how this arrangement would be structured and split between the two firms. After brief discussion, Rob Levine moved to adopt stag's recommendation to hire Kemper Securities as the lead underwriter, and George K. Baum as the co-manager. Jim Gibson seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. 3 Prior to moving to the next agenda item, Tom Steinberg asked Steve Jeffers, representing George K. Baum, about the status of the Pitkin Creek bonds. Mr. Jeffers advised the bonds closed with no last minute problems. Item No. 8 was the review of a T~wu of Vail Agreement for Fire Suppression and Protection Services between the Town of Vail and Vail Associates, Inc. Dick Duran briefly explained the agreement. Tom Steinberg moved to approve the agreement between TOV and VA for fire suppression and protection services, with a second from Rob Levine. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. Item No. 9 was review of a proposed contract for Town of Vail 1992 Street Seal Program. Larry Grafel explained the upcoming maintenance program, and noted this was a new investment for a program to extend the life of roadways included in the project fig,... five to eight years. Memos dated July 24, 1992, and July 30, 1992, from Public Works listed bidder results, project time frame, and explained the street seal program process. Ron Phillips added it was felt this was a major maintenance program Council should be informed of and have the opportunity to review before execution of a contract to proceed. After discussion primarily concerning heavy construction equipment impact on the roadways, Council unanimously agreed to approve execution of the contract, 5-0. Item No. 10 was a Tvwu Council appeal of the PEC decision to approve a request t0 amend a condition of a previously approved exterior alteration relating to the CCI parking pay-in- lieu fee for the Red Lion Building, located at 304 Bridge Street. The pay-in-lieu option allows businesses in Vail Village and Lionshead to pay the Town a fee instead of building parking spaces in pedestrian areas. Mike Mollica briefly reviewed the background and description of the applicant's request as described in the Community Devel„r~...ent Department's (CDD) memo to the PEC dated July 27, 1992. Jay Peterson, representing the applicant, Vencura, Ltd., requested Council uphold the PEC decision to delete the previously accepted condition requiring the applicant to pay any incremental increase in the Town's pay-in-lieu parking fees established within two years from the time a building permit was issued for the Red Lion Building redevel~r~ent. The applicant, through Mr. Peterson, had accepted that condition of approval at the April 17, 1990 T.,~u Council evening meeting. After accepting this condition and completing the Red Lion redevel~,N~ent, Mr. Peterson said he became aware of two other projects, the Gasthoff Gramshammer and the Lancelot additions, which were not required to pay the increased pay-in-lieu fee. Mr. Peterson felt it was unfair that the condition was not placed on all additions. Jim Gibson said there was a difference in this case in that the ~~uers of the other developments said, at the time of the review of their plans, they were unwilling to pay the higher fee, and the applicant in this case agreed to pay. After discussion, Jim Gibson moved to overturn the PEC's decision of July 27, 1992, approving a request to amend a condition of a previously approved exterior alteration relating to the CCI parking pay-in-lieu fee for the Red Lion Building. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor A~1°l'~ST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:\MINSAUG4.92 4 Jt MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 18, 1992 8:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, August 18, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 8:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Buckley Jim Gibson Rob Levine Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, T.,~u Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the T.,~u Manager Martha Raecker, T.,~u Clerk The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation of which there was none. Second on the agenda was an update on the Town of Vail management systems review being conducted by Browne, Bortz & Coddington (BBC}. Bob Mach introduced Dave Keen, Director of BBC. Mr. Keen advised BBC had been working with a Task Force comprised of Council members, TOV staff, and Vail residents to reassess TOV systems and identify ways TOV might improve its operations. He emphasized this review was not a personnel review. After a brief slide presentation, Mr. Keen indicated BBC had applied the Total Quality Management process in their review of approximately 100 individuals to date, and added after further confidential meetings with TOV employees and a randomly selected cross-section of Vail citizens, BBC expected to return to Council in early October, 1992, with a full preliminary report. He said a strong set of findings and recommendations for action would be available to Council in late October, 1992. Item No. 3 was a presentation by Ted Martin regarding the Celestial Seasonings Bicycle Classic scheduled for 8/20-23/92. Mr. Martin gave an update on the race, including information about participants in the race, team sizes, promotionaUadvertisingeflorts made, and sponsor information. He noted there was only one local in this year's race, and the race was apro-only team race with a $25,000 cash prize for the winner. Mr. Martin said 7,500 - 10,000 spectators were anticipated in Vail Village on Saturday, 8/22, and requested a Council member help hand out awards that day. Item No. 4 was a Consent Agenda consisting of one item, Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992, second reading, an ordinance setting forth a special review process to allow for staff approvals for temporary signage, structures, street decor, and other temporary improvements for the 1992 Mountain Bike World Cup Finals. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Jim Gibson asked the item be removed fem...., the Consent Agenda for additional discussion. Tim Devlin then explained the ordinance was no longer an emergency ordinance, and the guidelines specifically related to cold air balloons from previously denied Ordinance No. 20, Series of 1992, were incorporated into Ordinance No. 21. John Garnsey again asked for Council's support because of the precarious position the VVF was in with regard to the sponsors of this event. It was noted this ordinance was for this one event only. But, Mr. Garnsey indicated, as the market became more competitive and it became more difficult to bring in the corporate dollars to run these types of events, he could not say he would not be before Council again with this same type of request. There was brief discussion about the equipment needed for filling up the cold air balloons, and potential noise factors. Jim Shearer moved to approve Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1992, with a second from Rob Levine. Before a vote was taken, Jim Gibson spoke of his reluctance about cold air balloons, and recommended voting no on the issue now in deference to what may happen in the future. He recalled TOV had sent Kent Rose and John Garnsey to Italy to get this race here, that TOV wanted the race here, 1 I but felt the race and need for the balloons were not inextricably bound. Merv agreed, but said he viewed this as an opportunity to see how the cold air balloons were handled, how they looked, and for after-event public input. He stated he would have no trouble saying no in the future if he found these balloons detracted fi„u. the quality of Vail. Mayor Osterfoss felt a positive aspect to Ordinance No. 21 was it set up a precedent for case by case review. She felt it would be helpful if TOV could have feedback after this event to be utilized in the future. She felt it was important, until there was additional evidence indicating this was appropriate on a regular basis, this kind of approval be linked to a specific event rather than being a blank approval. Jim Shearer called the question. A vote was then taken and the motion passed, 5-2, Jim Gibson and Tom Steinberg opposed. Item No. 5 was Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, first reading, an ordinance creating a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18,14, 18.16, 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, and 18.39 to provide for the addition of employee housing units as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the T.,wu of Vail, and setting forth details in regard thereto; amending Chapter 18.4, setting forth certain definitions for an employee housing unit, a bathroom, and a kitchenette. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Kristan Pritz said she understood some Council members wanted more time to review this ordinance. Both Kristan and Mayor Osterfoss noted the ordinance concepts were familiar, but, since there had been 10-12 revised drafts since Council last saw the ordinance, the wording was different. Staff felt it was important for Council to review the ordinance as now presented. Merv Lapin wanted to review it with staff during the next scheduled work session, primarily because Council had two new members who were not fully familiar with the potential impact of this ordinance. Tom Steinberg and Bob Buckley supported the idea of reviewing the ordinance at next work session. Jim Gibson did not want any further delay, and asked for first reading of the ordinance at this meeting. Abe Shapiro felt the concept of employee housing units (EHUs) was good and absolutely necessary, but he felt Agricultural Open Space zoning was omitted from the ordinance fi„ being entitled to EHUs. He noted he had spoken with Kristan, and she had advised him the Community Development Department did not foresee any problem with including ag open space property under Type II EHUs. There was discussion about keeping ag open space out of the ordinance because of the character and intent of that zone district. Further discussion followed about the use and allocation of 250s. Council took a series of straw votes, and decided each side of the duplex in Primary/Secondary and Duplex Zone Districts should be entitled to a 250 and the property should be entitled to a total of 500 additional square feet of GRFA. Council unanimously decided Type II EHUs should not be eligible for credits. They also voted in support of Abe Shapiro's request to include Type II EHUs as a conditional use in ag open space zoning. There was some discussion as to whether the 425 square foot GRFA credit should be available to Type I EHUs. Staff advised Type I EHUs as proposed in the ordinance were what was currently allowed in the present zoning code, and these units were being constructed today with the 425 square foot GRFA credit. Staff believed the proposed Employee Housing ordinance should not alter the formulas used to determine GRFA on properties. Staff reemphasized the potential amount of GRFA on lots would not increase as a result of this ordinance. The only impact this ordinance would have on GRFA was that it would allow a property owner to use the 250 earlier than what current code provided for. To be certain there was full understanding of the ordinance, Peggy suggested the ordinance be gone through at this meeting to evaluate the number of questions needing clarification, and based on that, make a decision whether or not to table the ordinance to next work session. It was further noted TOV wanted to encourage devel.,~,~..ent of EHUS, and therefore, wanted to move forward in a timely manner. Using the chart on the back of the ordinance which displayed standards for each of the five different types of EHUS in the ordinance, Andy Knudtsen explained the meaning of Employee Housing Unit, and discussed each EHU-type criteria. Council questions and comments followed Andy's description of each type of EHU. Comments included expressed questions about 425s, 250 credits, parking requirements, ag open space, and connecting doors. Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, on first reading with modification to include agricultural open space utilization as part of Type II EHUs, that no additional credits would be added for a Type II EHU, that a second 250 could be utilized an the five year time frame in addition to the 250 that could be used up fi~ut or pooled for 500 up front for Type II EHUs. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, there was additional discussion concerning credits for Type I and Type 5 EHUs. It was agreed to keep 425 credit for each of these EHU types, and wording needed to be changed to indicate there needed to be separate entryways. Bob Buckley stated he was uncomfortable voting for this ordinance until he had further understanding of it. He 2 planned to meet with Kristan and Andy for explanation prior to second reading. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 4-3, Tom Steinberg, Merv Lapin, and Bob Buckley opposed. It was agreed a work session discussion particularly focused on Council's question regarding agricultural open space would be scheduled for 8/24/92. Additionally, Merv Lapin expressed concern about potential increased traffic and density as a result of this ordinance. Jim Shearer said he felt it was TOV's responsibility to increase employee housing as much as possible, and to encourage the private sector to follow suit. Item No. 6 was Resolution No. 12, Series of 1992, a resolution authorizing the Town Manager to execute a contract between the Department of Transportation and the Town of Vail providing for the cooperation in an enhancement project for design and construction of a bicycle recreation trail, which will be a new bridge south of I-70 along Gore Creek between West Vail and the Dowd Junction interchange. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Merv Lapin moved to approve Resolution No. 12 Series of 1992, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-0, Jim Gibson temporarily away from Council Chambers. Larry Grafel briefly explained that minor changes to the negotiated contract centered around clarifying the difference between capital maintenance and the operational maintenances as far as responsibilities, to make sure the right-of--ways TOV purchased or made easements against remained with TOV and not with the state, and any-right-of--way licensing that would have to take place between the railroad would be done between the state and the railroad itself. Item No. 7 was action on a proposed contract with Telecommunications Management Corp. to analyze the application by Tri-County Television, Inc. for a Town of Vail franchise. Larry Eskwith explained because of potential conflicts with TCI, he felt it would be wise to bring in a consultant with overbuild experience. The consultant would be paid f~„~ part of the $10,000 fee the applicant was required to pay for administrative services. By using the consultant, Larry felt TOV might be able to mitigate conflicts between this overbuild and TCI. He would like, if possible, to avoid a litigation situation. After brief discussion, Rob Levine moved to approve the contract with Tele.,~,~...munications Management Services, Inc., with a second f~~=„ Merv Lapin. A vote was taken anal the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Before the meeting was adjourned, Pam Brandmeyer reminded those present about the following meetings: * Wednesday, 8/19/92, at 5:15 P.M. - Speak-Up Meetings ~ C.J. Capers. * Thursday, 8/20/92, at 7:30 A.M. - Symposium. Breakfast @ The Lodge at Vail. * Thursday, 8/20/92, at 7:00 P.M. - Special Evening Meeting: Par 3 Golf Course. * Friday, 8/21/92, Q 11:30 A.M. - International Bridge Ribbon Cutting. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor A~l°l'~;ST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Minutes tarn by Dorianne S. Deto C:VuIINAUG18.92y 3 MINUTES SPECIAL EVENING MEETING, AUGUST 20, 1992, 7:00 P.M. A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE TOWN OF VAIL AND THE VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT REGARDING THE PROPOSED BOOTH FALLS PAR 3 GOLF COURSE PROJECT A joint public meeting with the Town of Vail and the Vail Recreation District regarding the proposed Booth Falls Par 3 Golf Course project was held on Thursday, August 20, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob Levine Bob Buckley TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Martha Raecker, Town Clerk VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ken Wilson, Chairman of the VRD Rob Robinson, Director of the VRD Mayor Peggy Osterfoss gave a brief meeting overview. In response to community residents questions and concerns, the Vail Town Council and the Vail Recreation District (VRD) organized this meeting for input on this proposed project before final Council approval of a lease between the TOV and the VRD for development and subsequent operation of a Par 3 Golf Course on a parcel of land in Booth Creek. Ken Wilson, Chairman of the VRD, reviewed the chronology of the Par 3 Golf Course planning and public meetings from August 9, 1989, through August 12, 1992. Mr. Wilson gave a detailed analysis and follow-up to the results of a 1991 informal survey used to obtain public input regarding organizational changes the VRD was contemplating. He stated the VRD prioritized its funding endeavors in response to the survey results, and noted the Par 3 Golf Course was ranked as item 13 on that survey. Rob Robinson, Director of the VRD, gave a financial update on the proposed project, including estimated construction costs. He later indicated this course would pay for itself and produce additional revenue for the VRD. Ernie Bender, Vail Golf Course Superintendent, discussed environmental issues related to the proposed golf course, specifically water use and use of fertilizers and chemicals as part of an integrated pest management program. Dick Bailey, Golf Course Architect, displayed a preliminary site plan of the proposed course design, reviewed the course layout, and discussed safety factors figured into the design. Jim Morter of Morter Architects, the firm selected to design the proposed course starter house and parking layout, displayed the proposed site plans for both the building and the parking area. He said the starter house would be less than 2,000 square feet, and indicated the Planning and Environmental Commission had determined 24 regular and 2 handicap parking spaces would be sufficient at this time. Following the VRD presentations, Council questions focused primarily on concerns about environmental impacts, water use, safety issues, TOV's legal liabilities, problems with the bus stop and turning of buses on Bald Mountain Road, parking in general, and winter usage of the starter house. There was brief discussion about what permitted and conditional uses were allowed for the site. Kristan Pritz later briefly addressed permitted zoning uses. After Lou MesKimen, member of the VRD, first spoke in favor of the project, Charlie Langmaid spoke in opposition. He read, in full, a letter dated April 1, 1992, to Rob Robinson from Richard M. Phelps, golf course designer. Mr. Phelps had originally been selected by the VRD as one of three finalists being considered to design the proposed course, but, after his review of aerial photos of the proposed course site, he wrote to ask the VRD to withdraw him from, further consideration as a possible 1 . t designer of the course. His letter elaborated on a number of concerns regarding safety issues related to site limitations. Mr. Bailey, the architect chosen for the project, said Mr. Phelps' response was based on preliminary sketches. Rob Robinson stated the VRD had taken that letter very seriously, and he advised the letter had been reviewed point by point. Larry Eskwith spoke briefly about legal liability and governmental immunity. Public input followed. Paul Hay, Liz Webster, Robert Ansel, Flo Steinberg, Evie Nott, Larry Benway, and Barbie Christopher expressed mutual concerns in opposition of the proposed course. Their concerns included landscaping issues, bus stop and bus turn-around problems on Bald Mountain Road, fertilizer and chemical use, water use, berming problems, noise issues, safety issues, course design problems, parking problems, concern about potential changes to neighborhood characteristics, and a desire to maintain open space. Paul Rondeau, resident on the Championship Golf Course, inquired as to where the proposed Par 3 Golf Course would be in relation to the 1,400 acres of TOV open space, and how the 1,400 acres were categorized. He felt many residents were unaware of where TOV's open space areas were. Evie Nott, Founder of the Nature Center, displayed recent photographs of the proposed golf course site, and included a list of wildflowers now there. Ms. Nott proposed a joint stewardship between the Nature Center and the Vail Alpine Garden to preserve the site. She stated Helen Fritch, Founder of the Vail Alpine Garden, was interested in that concept. Peter and Joan Jaffee, Dennis Nichols, Hermann Staufer, Rick Pirog, and Scott Darrel all spoke in favor of the project. Diana Donovan said she was not against the project, but asked for proof of its need. She felt there was a need to create a process to address the use of agricultural open space, and felt strongly that the safety concerns expressed by Mr. Phelps needed much further consideration. Ken Wilson called for Council to confirm their original approval by making a decision on the signing of the lease. Mayor Osterfoss advised the approval or disapproval of the lease would not take place at this meeting. Mayor Osterfoss called for final input, and then Council members were individually polled for their response. Jim Shearer was for the project, feeling this project was a good blend of use for the site; Jim Gibson was 100% in favor of the project, and believed the VRD would do everything possible regarding expressed safety concerns. Tom Steinberg stated he was not ready to make a decision. He noted Larry Eskwith had been directed to look into a land trust with abuilt-in required vote of the people, and he wanted to know what would be done with the $1 million cost of this project if the golf course was not built. Merv Lapin said he was 75% in favor, but indicated he still had some unanswered questions, primarily about use of municipal water. Rob Levine was for the project, but expressed concern about the bus turn-around situation. Bob Buckley, who resides on Bald Mountain Road, said he was for the project, primarily because he was for development of Booth Creek. Mayor Osterfoss spoke of the importance of maintaining balance, and said she felt a golf course was a form of open space. She advised there were still issues to be addressed before approval of the lease, particularly the safety and environmental questions raised by many in attendance. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:IMINSMAY5.92 2 August 27, 1992 Mayor Peggy Osterfoss T.O.V. 75 S. Frontage Road W. Vail, CO 81657 Dear Peggy: During our most recent General Meeting of the Board. of Realtors, Tuesday August 25th, Merv Lapin, Ron Phillips and Rob Levine spoke on behalf of the Town of Vail providing an up date to our members regarding on recent happenings, goals, ect. As a result of that meeting it came to our attention that scheduled as part of your upcoming meeting on September lst, there will be a 2nd reading for a proposed ordinance allowing the creation of rental apartments for existing single family homes and duplexes throughout the town. On behalf of the Vail Board of Realtors I would make a request to you to table this 2nd reading for a couple of weeks to allow our members and directorate to look into this potential situation and it's ramifications in greater detail. Peggy as you are aware, one of my goals as president of the board. is to assist the town wherever possible regarding real estate matters. Yet I remain sensitive to our organization being viewed by the town as obstructionists. We feel this issue needs a closer look. Briefly, some of our concerns are; - Would the creation of a rental apartment thereby create additional traffic by 2 or ? fold? Does adding 1 bedroom really mean 2 or 3 people would be using it and also parking for 2 or 3 more cars? What kind of impact would that have on the neighborhood both aesthetically and in terms of values? This concern would be true in any subdivision, West Vail or Rockledge Road. - Does this apartment violate current zoning regulation? By creating secondary units in single family areas and likewise triplexes in duplex zoned areas does the town open itself up for lawsuits by unhappy owners? - In the past we have seen existing, non-conforming rental lockoffs and some of the problems they have created, legal and otherwise. Would this ordinance grandfather those still current outlaw units? I'm sure there are many more issues we haven't even considered. Count on my attendance for your Tuesday meeting. I hope you'll agree this needs a little closer look. Si cerely, z ~f Doug Ketchum Pres~dent, Vail Board of Realtors _ _ ~:~i Vdll® e P.O. Box 7 r Vail, Colorado 81658 - s 1 - ~ t 11ai1 Associstes, Irrc. -Creators and Operators of Vail and Beaver Creek. ORDINANCE N0.9 SERIES 1992 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW CHAr ~ cR 18.57 -EMPLOYEE HOUSING AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO; AMENDING CHAPTERS 18.10, 18.12, 18.13, 18.14, 18.16,. 18.18, 18.20, 18.22, 18.24, 18.27, 18.28, 18.29, 18.34, 18.36, AND 18.39 TO PROVIDE F4R THE ADDITION OF EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS AS PERMITTED OR CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN CERTAIN ZONE DISTRI~ ~ ~ WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL, AND St ~ ~ LNG FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO; AMENDING CHAPTER 18.04, SC ~ ~ LNG FORTH CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FOR AN EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT, A BATHROOM, AND A KITCHENC ~ ~ E. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail's economy is largely tourist based and the health of this economy is based on exemplary service for Vail's guests; and WHEREAS, Vail's ability to provide such service is dependent upon a strong, high quality and consistently available work force; and WHEREAS, to achieve such a work force, the community must work to provide quality living and working conditions; and WHEREAS, the Town recognizes the importance of its role in these efforts; and WHEREAS, the availability of housing plays a critical role in creating quality living and working conditions for the community's work force; and WHEREAS, in January, 1990, the Town of Vail commenced the preparation of an employee housing study which assessed the community's need for expanding the supply of employee housing for both year-round and seasonal, local residents, and provided a series of policies and recommendations to be followed by the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail Affordable Housing Study was completed and, following months of study, work sessions, and public hearings with the Town Council, the Planning and Environmental Commission, and the general public, the study was approved by the Town Council on November 20, 1990; and WHEREAS, the study concluded there is a shortage of employee housing in the Town of Vail; and WHEREAS, the Town Council now wishes to implement recommendations and policies set forth in the Affordable Housing Study for the provision of certain types of employee housing as a permitted or a conditional use in certain zone districts within the Town; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: h Section 1 Chapter 18.04 -Definitions of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.105, to read as follows: Section 18.04.105 Employee Housing Unit (EHU) shall mean a dwelling unit which shall not be leased or rented for any period less than thirty (30) consecutive days, and shall be rented only to tenants who are full-time employees in Eagle County. EHUs shall be allowed in certain zone districts as set forth in Chapter 18 of this Code. Development standards for EHUs shall be as provided in Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing. For the purposes of this Section, afull-time employee shall mean a person who works a minimum of an average of thirty (30) hours per week. There shall be five (5) categories of EHUs: Type I, Type II, Type III, Type IV and Type V. Provisions relating to each type of EHU are set forth in Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing of this Code. Section 2 Chapter 18.04 -Definitions of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.033 to read as follows: Section 18.04.033 Bathroom shall mean a room containing a working shower or bathtub, sink, and toilet. Section 3 Chapter 18.04 -Definitions of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Section 18.04.192 to read as follows: Section 18.04.192 Kitchenette shall mean a room containing not less than the following fixtures and appliances: a microwave oven and/or cooking surface, sink, and refrigerator. Section 4 Title 18 of the Vail Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of Chapter 18.57 to read as follows: Chapter 18.57 - Emplovee Housinq Sections: 18.57.010 -Purpose 18.57.020 -Employee Housing Units (EHU) Generally 2 18.57..030 -Applicability 18.57.040 - Type I -Employee Housing Unit 18.57.050 -Type II -Employee Housing Unit 18.57.060 -Type III -Employee Housing Unit 18.57.070 -Type IV -Employee Housing Unit 18.57.080 - Type V -Employee Housing Unit 18.57.010 - Pumose The Town of Vail's economy is largely tourist based and the health of this economy is premised on exemplary service for Vail's guests. Vail's ability to provide such service is dependent upon a strong, high quality and consistently available work force. To achieve such a work force, the community must work to provide quality living and working conditions. Availability of housing plays a critical role in creating quality living and working conditions for the community's work force. The Town recognizes a permanent, year round population plays an important role in sustaining a healthy, viable community. Further, the Town recognizes its rote in conjunction with the private sector in ensuring housing is available. 18.57.020 - Emnlovee Housina Units (EHU1 Generally A) A chart attached to this chapter and incorporated herein by reference illustrates the requirements for each type of EHU. B) No employee housing unit which is constructed in accordance with this Chapter shall be subdivided or divided into any form of time shares, interval ownerships, or fractional fee. C) An EHU shall be rented only to tenants who are full-time employees who work in Eagle County, and shall not be leased for a period less than thirty (30) consecutive days. For the purposes of this Section, afull-time employee is one who works an average of a minimum of thirty (30) hours each week. D) With the exception of Type I EHUs on lots less than 15,000 square feet, no EHU shall be subdivided, sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from any single-family dwelling, or two-family dwelling or multi-family dwelling it may be a part of. If an EHU is permitted to be located in a garage it shall not be sold separately from the dweNing unit or units located on the site or lot. E) No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of each employee housing unit within the Town which is constructed following the effective date of this ordinance shall submit two (2) copies of a report on a form to be obtained from the Community Development 3 Department, to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail and Chairman of the Town of Vail Housing Authority setting forth evidence establishing that each tenant whom resides within their employee housing unit is a full-time employee in Eagle County. F) No property containing an EHU shall exceed the maximum GRFA permitted in Title 18 except as provided in Paragraph 18.57.040 (B)4, 18.57.050 (B)5 or 18.57.080 (B)3 of this Chapter. G) All trash facilities shall be enclosed. H) All surface parking shall be screened by landscaping or berms as per Design Review Guidelines, Section 18.54.050 (D) 3. I) Any applicant who applies for a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing employee housing, shall not be required to pay a Conditional Use Permit application fee. J) The provisions as set forth in Section 18.57.020 paragraphs B,C,D, and E shall be incorporated into a written agreement in a form approved by the Town Attorney which shall run with the land and shall not be amended or terminated without the written approval of the Town of Vail. Said agreement shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder Office prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of an EHU. K) Each EHU shall have a separate entrance that shall not be connected in any way to any unit tt may be attached to. 18.57.030 - Annlicability A) The requirements of this Chapter shall be in addition to the requirements set forth in each zone district where EHUs are permitted by this Chapter and all other requirements of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. B) Where the provisions or requirements of this Chapter conflict with the provisions or requirements set forth in any zone district or any other requirements of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the provisions of this Chapter shall control. 18.57.040 - Tvue I - Emulovee Housina Unit A) Purpose To allow for construction of an EHU on lots in the Primary/Secondary and Two-Family Zone Districts which do not meet the minimum lot size requirement for said zone districts. B) General Conditions A Type I EHU shall comply with the following general provisions: 4 1. It shall be a permitted use in the Primary/Secondary Residential, and Two-Family Residential zone districts. 2. tt shall be allowed on a lot that is less than 15,000 square feet in total site area. 3. It shall be one (1) of the dwelling units in atwo-family dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050 (I) Design Guidelines Duplex and Primary/Secondary Development. It may also be located in, or attached to, an existing garage provided the garage is not located within any setback, and further provided that no existing parking required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code is reduced or eliminated. 4. It shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the total GRFA allowed on the lot. An applicant, however, shall be permitted to apply to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail for additional GRFA not to exceed two hundred fifty (250) square feet to be used in the construction of the EHU. The applicant shalt submit an application for the additional GRFA on a form provided by the Community Development Department. Approval or denial of the request shall be made by the Design Review Board in accordance with Section 18.54.040. If an applicant obtains Design Review Board approval for additional GRFA for the EHU, he or she shall not be entitled to receive additional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross Residential Floor Area of this Code for either unit on the lot. 5. A Type I EHU may be rented in compliance with Section 18.57.020 or it may be sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from any Single-Family, or Two-Family dwelling it may be a part of or if located in a garage, from any of the other dwellings on the lot or site so long as it meets the following conditions: a. It must be used as a permanent residence. For the purpose of this paragn~ph, a permanent residence shall mean the home or place in which one's habitation is fixed and to which one, whenever he or she is absent, has a present intention of returning after a departure or absence therefrom, regardless of the duration of absence. In determining what is a permanent residence, the Town staff shall take the following circumstances relating to the owner of the residence into account: business pursuits, employment, income sources, residence for income or other tax purposes, age, marital status, residence of parents, spouse and children if any, location of personal and real property, and motor vehicle registration. b. If a Type I EHU is sold, transferred, or conveyed separately from the other unit in a Two-Family dwelling it is a part of, then both the Type I EHU and the unit to which it is attached shall be subject to all the provisions set forth in Section 18.57.020 E,F,G,H and J of this 5 ordinance. 6. No less than fifty percent (50%) of the parking required for the Type 1 EHU by the Vail Municipal Code shall be enclosed. 7. It shall be entitled to a GRFA credit of 425 sq. ft., as set forth to Sections 18.12.090 (A) and 18.13.080 (A) of this code. C) A~olication Any person who wishes to construct a Type I EHU shall submit an application for Design Review Board approval to the Community Development Department containing the following information: 1. The name and mailing address of the applicant. 2. The written consent of the owners of the lot or property to be included in the application or the written consent of their agent or authorized representatives. For the purposes of this paragraph, agent or authorized representative shall mean any individual or association authorized or empowered in writing by the property owner to act on his or her behalf. If any of the property to be included is a condominiumized development, the pertinent condominium association may be considered the agent or authorized representative for the individual unit owner if allowed by all pertinent requirements of the condominium association's declarations. 3. The legal description and street address of the lot or site for which the proposal is made. 4. A list of the owner or owners of record and their mailing addresses for the properties adjacent to the property which is the subject of the hearing. D) Review The application shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board in aa:ordance with Chapter 18.54-Design Review of the Town of Vait Municipal Code. 18.57.050 - Tvne II - Emalovee Housina Unit A) Purpose To allow for the construction of an EHU on lots in the Single-Family, Two-Family, and Primary/Secondary zone districts which meet the minimum lot size requirement for said zone districts. B) General Conditions 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Single-Family Residential, Two-Family Residential and Primary/Secondary Residential zone districts. s 2. It shall be permitted only on lots which comply with minimum lot size requirements of the zone district in which the lot is located. 3. It shat! be located within, or attached to, asingle-family dwelling or be located within, or attached to, atwo-family dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050(1) -Design Guidelines Duplex and Primary/Secondary Development. It may also be located in, or attached to, an existing garage provided the garage is not located within any setback, and further provided that no existing parking required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code is reduced or eliminated. 4. It shall not ~ counted as a dwelling -unit for the purposes of calculating density. However, it shall contain kitchen facilities and a bathroom, as defined in Chapter 18.04 - Definitions of the Vail Municipal Code. It shall be permitted to be a third dwelling unit in addition to the two dwelling units which may already exist on the lot. Only one Type II EHU shall be allowed per lot. 5. It shall have a GRFA not less than three hundred (300) square feet, nor more than nine hundred (900) square feet. An applicant, however, shall be permitted to apply to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail for additional GRFA not to exceed five hundred (500) square feet to be used in the construction of the EHU. The applicant shall submit an application for the additional GRFA on a form provided by the Community Development Department. Approval or denial of the request shall be made by the Design Review Board in accordance with Section 18.54.040. If an applicant obtains Design Review Board approval for 500 sq. ft. of additional GRFA for the EHU, he or she shall not be entitled to receive additional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross Residential Floor Area of this Code for either unit on the lot. If an applicant obtains Design Review Board approval for not more than 250 sq. ft. of additional GRFA for the EHU, he or she shall be entitled to receive addttional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross Residential Floor Area of this code for one dwelling unit on the lot. 6. It shall have no more than two (2) bedrooms. 7. No more than two (2) adults and one (1) child not older than sixteen (16) years of age shall reside in a one (1) bedroom Type II EHU. No more than two (2) adults and two (2) children not older than sixteen (16) years of age shall reside in a two (2) bedroom Type II EHU. 8. Each Type II EHU shall be required to have no less than one (1) parking space for each bedroom located therein. All parking spaces required by this Code shall be located on the same lot or site as the EHU. If no dwelling exists upon the property which is .proposed for 7 a Type II EHU at the time a building permit is issued, or if an existing dwelling is to be demolished and replaced by a new dwelling, not less than one (1) of the parking spaces required by this paragraph shall be enclosed. A 300 sq. ft. GRFA credit shall be allowed for the construction of one enclosed parking space for the Type 11 EHU. 18.57.060 - Tvoe III - Emulovee Housing Unit A) Puroose To allow for the construction of EHUs in multiple family and mixed use zone districts. B) General Conditions 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple-Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core II, Commercial Core III, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, Public Use, and Ski Base/Recreation zone districts. 2. It may be constructed on legal non-conforming lots and sites as well as on lots and sites which meet the minimum lot size requirements in the zone district in which it is located. 3. It shall be counted as 0.5 dwelling units for the purposes of calculating density. The number of Type III EHUs shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permit review process set forth in Chapter 18.60.060 - Criteria -Findings. 4. It shall have a GRFA of not less than four hundred fifty (450) square feet and not more than nine hundred (900) square feet. 5. It shall have kitchen facilities and a bathroom as defined in Chapter 18.04 - Definitions of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. 6. It shall have no more than three (3) bedrooms. 7. No more than two (2) persons for each bedroom located therein shall reside in a Type III EHU. 8. It shall be required to have one (1) parking space for each bedroom. However, if a one (1) bedroom Type III EHU exceeds six hundred (600) square feet it shall have two (2) parking spaces. Any guest parking requirements shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as a part of the conditional use permit review process set forth in 18.60.060. 9. It shall not be entitled to additional GRFA in accordance with Chapter 18.71- Additional Gross Residential Floor Area. 10. GRFA shall be determined as set forth to Section 18.04.130 (B) of this code. 18.57.070 - Type IV - Employee Housing Unit A) Purpose To allow for the construction of EHUs in multifamily and mixed use zone districts which are similar to studio dwelling units. B) General Conditions 1. It shall be a conditional use in the Residential Cluster, Low Density Multiple-Family, Medium Density Multiple-Family, High Density Multiple-Family, Public Accommodation, Commercial Core I, Commercial Core II, Commercial Core III, Commercial Service Center, Arterial Business District, Parking District, Public Use, and SkVBase Recreation zone districts. 2. Itmay be constructed on legal non-conforming lots and sites as well as on lots and sites which meet the minimum lot size requirement in the zone district in which it is located. 3. It shall be counted as 0.333 of a dwelling unit for the purposes of calculating density. The number of Type IV EHUs shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission as part of the conditional use permits review process set forth in Chapter 18.60.060 - Criteria -Findings. 4. It shall have a GRFA of not less than two hundred (200) square feet and not more than three hundred (300) square feet and shall include a bathroom and a kitchenette as defined in Chapter 18.04 -Definitions of the Vail Municipal Code. 5. Each building which contains aType IV EHU shall contain a storage locker not less than 5' width x 6' height x 5' length (one hundred fifty cubic feet) in size for each Type IV EHU contained therein, and not less than one (1) washer and dryer for common use by each eight (8) EHUs located therein. In no event shall less than one (1) washer and dryer be provided in a building with less than eight (8) EHUs. 6. No more than one (1) person shall reside in a Type IV EHU. 7. It shall be required to have one (1) parking space. Guest parking requirements shall be determined by the Planning and Environmental Commission in accordance with the conditional use permit review process set forth in Chapter 18.60.060 Criteria -Findings. 8. It shall not be entitled to additional GRFA under Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross Residential Floor Area. 9. GRFA shall be determined as set forth In Section 18.04.130 (B) of this code. 9 18.57.080 - Tvae V - Em~lovee Housina Unit A) Pun3ose To allow for construction of an EHU on lots in the Hillside Residential Zone District. B) General Conditions A Type V EHU shall comply with the following general provisions: 1. It shall be a permitted use in the Hillside Residential Zone District. 2. It shall be one (1) of the dwelling units in atwo-family dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050 (I) Design Guidelines Duplex and Primary/Secondary Development. It may also be located in, or attached to, an existing garage provided the garage is not located within any setback, and further provided that no existing parking required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code is reduced or eliminated. It shall not be a separate free-standing structure. 3. It shall have a GRFA of not more than one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet. An applicant, however, shall be permitted to apply to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail for additional GRFA not to exceed two hundred fifty (250) square feet to be used in the construction of the EHU. The applicant shall submit an application for the additional GRFA on a form provided by the Community Development Department. Approval or denial of the request shall be made by the Design Review Board in accordance with Section 18.54.040. if an applicant obtains Design Review Board approval for additional. GRFA for the EHU, he or she shall not be entitled to receive additional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 - Additional Gross Residential Floor Area of this Code for either unit on the lot. 4. No less than fifty percent (50%) of the parking required for the Type V EHU by the Vail Municipal Code shall be enclosed. 5. It shalt be entitled to a GRFA credit of 425 sq. ft. as set forth in Sectlon 18.090.080 of this code. Section 5 Section 18.09.020 -Hillside Residential District {HR) Permitted Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby repealed and reenacted: Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in the HR district: A. Single Family residential dwellings; B. One Type V Employee Housing Unit per lot as set forth in Section f 8.57.080. 10 Section 6 Section 18.10.030 -Single Family District (SF) Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph H to read as follows: H. Type II Employee Housing Unit as set forth in Section 18.57.050 of this Code. Section 7 Section 18.12.020 -Two Family Residential District (R) Permitted Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph C to read as follows: C. Type I Employee Housing Unit as set forth in Section 18.57.040 of this Code. Section 8 Section 18.12.030 -Two Family Residential District (R) Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph H to read as follows: H. Type II Employee Housing Unit as set forth in Section 18.57.050. Section 9 Section 18.12.090(A) -Two Family Residential District (R) Density control, is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as follows: A. Not more than a total of iwo (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on lots less than fifteen thousand square feet. The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site: 1. Twenty five (25) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus 2. Ten (10) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, not to exceed thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of site area; plus 3. Five (5) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. In addition to the above, four hundred twenty five (425) square feet of Gross Residential Floor Area (GRFA) shall be permitted for each allowable dwelling unit. No Two-Family Residential lot except those located entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone, or the flood plain, or those of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet shall be so ~1 restricted that it can not be occupied by aTwo-Family dwelling. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Type I EHU may be allowed on lots which are less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in accordance with Chapter 18.57.040 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Section 10 Section 18.12.090(6) Two-Family Residential District (R) Density Control, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as follows: B. Notwithstanding the provision of Paragraph A of this Section 18.12.090} a Type I EHU shall be permitted on lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.57.040 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Section 11 Section 18.13.020 - Primary/Secondary Residential District (PS) Permitted Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition Paragraph C to read as follows: C. Type I Employee Housing Unit as defined in Section 18.57.040. Section 12 Section 18.13.030 -Primary/Secondary Residential District (PS) Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph G to read as follows: G. Type II Employee Housing Unit as set forth in Section 18.57.050. Section 13 Section 18.13.080(A) -Primary/Secondary Residential District (PS) Density Control, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby repealed and reenacted to read as follows: A. Not more than a total of two dwelling units shall be permitted on each site with only one dwelling unit permitted on lots less than fifteen thousand square feet. The following GRFA shall be permitted on each site: 1. Twenty five (25) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of the first fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of site area; plus 2. Ten (10) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area 12 over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, not to exceed thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of - site area; plus 3. Five (5) square feet of GRFA for each one hundred (100) square feet of site area in excess of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. In addition to the above, four hundred twenty five (425) square feet of GRFA shall be permitted for each allowable dwelling unit. On any site containing two (2) dwelling units, one (1) of the units shall not exceed 40% of the total allowable GRFA. No Primary/Secondary Residential lot except those located entirely in the red hazard avalanche zone, or the flood plain, or those of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet shall be so restricted that it can not be occupied by a Primary/Secondary dwelling. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Type 1 EHU maybe permitted on lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in accordance with Chapter 18.57.040 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Section 14 Section 18.13.080(6) -Primary/Secondary Residential District (PS) Density Control, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby repeated and reenacted to read as follows: B. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph A of this Section 18.13.080, a Type I EHU may be permitted on lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in accordance with Section 18.57.040 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Section 15 Section 18.14.030 Residential Cluster (RC) District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs I and J to read as follows: I. Type III EHU as defined in 18.57.060 of this Code. J. Type IV EHU as defined in 18.57.070 of this Code. Section 16 Section 18.16.030 Low-Density Multi-Family (LDMF) District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the additional of Paragraphs I and J to read as follows: I. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060 of this Code. i3 " J. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070 of this Code. Section 17 Section 18.18.030 Medium-Density Multiple-Family (MDMF) District Conditional Uses. of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs I and J to read as follows: I. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. J. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 18 Section 18.20.030 -High Density Multiple Family (HDMF) District Condi~onal Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs M and N to read as follows: M. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. N. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 19 Section 18.22.030 Public Accommodation (PA) District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs P and Q to read as follows: P. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. Q. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 20 Section 18.24.040(6), Commercial Core I (CCI) District Permitted and Conditional Uses - Second Floor, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Subparagraphs 10 and 11 to read as follows: 10. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. 11. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 21 Section 18.24.050{B), Commercial Core I (CCI) District Permitted and Conditional Uses - 14 Above Second Floor, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Subparagraphs 10 and 11 to read as follows: 10. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. 11. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 22 Section 18.27.030 (B), Commercial Core III (CCIII) District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby repealed and reenacted by read as follows: B. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060 and Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 23 Section 18.28.040, Commercial Service Center (CSC) District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs M and N to read as follows: M. Type Ill EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. N. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 24 Section 18.29.030(A), Arterial Business District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Type III EHU, as defined in Section 18.57.060 and Type IV EHU, as defined in Section 18.57.070 to the list of allowable conditional uses. Section 25 The following Paragraph is hereby repealed from Section 18.29.030(A), of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail: Multi-Family dwellings for the employees of the Upper Eagle Valley as further restricted by Section 18.27.130 of this zone district. Section 26 Section 18.34.030, Parking District Conditional Uses, of the Municipal Code of the Town 15 of Vail, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs E and F to read as follows: F. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. G. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 27 Section 18.36.030, Public Use (PUD) District Conditional Uses -Generally, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraphs T and U to read as follows: T. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. U. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 28 Paragraph 18.36.030(P); Public Use (PUD) District Conditional Uses, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, is hereby repealed. Section 29 Section 18.39.050(A), Ski Base/Recreation District Conditional Uses, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, is hereby amended by the addition of Subparagraphs 13 and 14 to read as follows: 13. Type III EHU as defined in Section 18.57.060. 14. Type IV EHU as defined in Section 18.57.070. Section 30 Section 18.32.030, Agricultural and Open Space (A) District Conditional Uses, of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, is hereby amended by the addition of Paragraph J to read as follows: J. Type II EHU as defined in Section 18.57.050. Section 31 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and 16 each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any ' one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 32 The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 33 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 34 All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repeated to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this _ day of , and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk 17 r READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Ostertoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk nam~~,ae,oe9.sz, ardyC:UwusnpW RD92.vi 3 18 SECTION 18.57.020(A) -EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS (EHU) GENERALLY Max. No. Max. No. Zoning Lot Size Density Approv- of Bed- of Resl- Kitchen Parking Code EHU Districts Which Require- Calcula- GRFA Ownership Ing rooms dents Faclll- Requlre- Section Type Allow EHU's ments tions Restrictions 250 Potential Authority Allowed Allowed ties ments Credits 18.57.040 Type I PIS Two Family Less than 1.0 40% of Yes Yes, both DRB NIA NIA Full 50% 425 sq, ft. 15,000 allowable units get enclosed; GRFA restricted 1-2 spaces 18.57.050 Type II Agricultural/ Minimum 0.0 300-900 sq. ft. Yes No PEC 2 2 adults Full 1 space/ One Open Space of 15,000 2 children bedroom* garage Single Family sp. of 300 PIS Two Family ft• 18.57.060 Type III RC/LDMP! NIA 0.5 450-900 sq. ft. No No PEC 3 6 Full 1 space/ Multifamily MDMF/HDMFI bedroom* Credits PAICCIlCCIII CSC/ABDJP/ PU/SBR 18.57.070 Type IV RCILDMP/ N(A 0.333 ~ 200-300 sq. ft. No No PEC NIA 1 Kitchen- 1 space Multifamily MDMFMDMF! ette Credits PAlCCIICCIiI CSCIABDlPI PUISBR 18.57.080 Type V Hillside 21,780 1.0 0-1,200 sq. ft. Yes No DRB NIA NIA Full 1-2 425 sq. ft. Residential spaces' 50~° enclosed * -Please see text for specific requirements. c:lendylmemoskherte1292 ~ ~ " ORDINANCE NO. 22 SERIES 1992 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS ORDINANCE BY REFERENCE, FOR BIKE PATH PURPOSES BY NEGOTIATION IF POSSIBLE, AND, IF NEGOTIATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING THE PROPERTY, BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS. WHEREAS, the property described in Exhibit A ("the property") is necessary for the construction of a public bike path to be used for recreation purposes by the citizens of and visitors to the Town of Vail. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. The Town Council makes the following findings: A) The Town Council wishes to build a bike path to provide recreational opportunities for citizens and visitors to the Town of Vail. B) The property is necessary for the construction of the bike path. C) The acquisition of the property will serve the best interests of the public. 2. The Town staff is hereby authorized and directed to acquire the property through negotiations. If the property can not be acquired through negotiation, the Town Attorney or his designee is authorized and directed to initiate and pursue eminent domain proceedings to acquire it. 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not 1 t revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this day of , 1992, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C10RD9222 2 EXHIBIT A + ~ t0.n .tr#cy~ { ~js"7+}'`0 k~~1+ ~ w +r,~Y's~FS Z e ~ E~.: Bader • Sch em a ti c Property Map ~ ~ ~ x . - - j --7.~- ~ r ' ~ 4 Yr , i~'.. , f Fez r~d~'{1}'~.?E / ~ x ' t ~ / t' ~ ' ~I~ \ ' / / S ~ to ~p ) I~ y^ J^~ / Y I saes, u e e ecpw. a.~ wlw cswn. ` I ` • ~ arJ b ~ ro b ~ ~onw.y 'J ~ ~ r` _ rr I'\ ~w~'~..., .~~'aan ern. car a..~b ipe...ln / /:.I. ,"77 _ a...mr ew s..~nr. karu,... .~s m ~ a R ~ . 4• t\ / I. ~ ~ . \ I , C; I ro~~ I pF ~ NEJ/1 NWi/I - F I Sxhcn 11 TS S,R BJ W. \ ' \ •i I I ~ I lry I ~ I _ ~ I 4 . ~ cwwtnc scale I r ; wi I \O a ~s \ t ( ~ / t ~ -s a ~~~wYr}u rt.r JyA~ Yr a~4Jx. +~qL+., ~4!'~t ~ ~ SCNMUESE7j CORDON MEYER /IVG -i ~ ~ - ~ww ~ ow ~b ~ r,ra. ,~•r,!{ y -F 'y'tF S ~ J!~ ~ JQOI CRMp AION/~ SI///( 1-E ~ ii ~ ~ . ~ I croon sga'Jws~cwAOa etsoJ ~ .~$llLialQa~IC . r. a..,~ ..`erVv ,ti. w ~,.u~„ Bader Property ~ ~ 4~a,,.,..,~1„ ~~j g.~ an®cw ~ cacaeao ~ aaJ-enT p,,1'vPel~j''.tiA~ ~n r+ cox/. r r°~ .yi 4 ,a it , o v!'.'.+.~., v~.or ;{:~:a rk{~¢v 71tFS.'~ ~ , ^t'ti'.~'4 1 + x. ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 3c:~ "^7i ~ ~ lR~itt!, _;6,9?'iwti g i1'.v~ EXHIBIT A West Vall Blke Path Easem en is Vall In term o un taln Development Su b dl i Isi on 'tyµ panlNt„ _ aN , aa. nn waaame a Nw•1 •f 11w ~3wtN N wt r, alwa'ta, r•Il Itwrrytal. orrlN r all N tr Dora •w a'.sro•r, yt1 Nrar.. m~erwe. BI o ck 10, Lots 1, 2<-~, 2B, 3.4, 3B, 5 D...l.a..t ..N,.IeN.. ayl ;<N.tx. NNrN.. m r.m N,. w. N Nremluti w.erlr . . 1Nr. .E . a•Iluw w aa• rnN••a oer r • .Ij Nt l •N «ly aN <rN wua •r Numay; a • elio• rri• n• a o u• y u• a •Nrw u.n rmt •xe: NN rmuru rr.rreexir w• er em La i to • NNi • et t• •r •s' 0<Nt; ••asr N• nr sy Eagle County Colorado ' ~ n. m..; ,:.r. ; w .1,Nw N.r... l N• ?.N fwt: • 1 < Yt• t .).It x«t: H•oa• • w• , A •r.fl f t is • let tN Wrlr IIe• a •aM Let 1 n•re. a )r e~• af• ria er ~fi i rNl roa.a r t . . Nm e ern• v •w• .N r wN~ a oe •r ~r:•s:N ~4 1 .raw e.n. at w• n1~i mwu N•ar•1 .ya• .i v• I ~ , N wN•NQy •bn IN•.y .r•1 ° ;O• y f••t b trr• Nlal a NIlY1y. 11 •m Nty1Ny 11) t. f••t. .Dt • N «n e R yI Lw1L Dnealrrl°. - tN n. aril fate WOn) .S ' ~f'~ L e•re•1 er uN INUN a Let a a~eu ).n 1 tuD r.D~~,-0` ~e~t•'•~ mr<leNe.t~.Nl•1.1•., t•el~ Ca.atr. UfNe. Nmuetl to a« ~r orne• o eom~ ~eu~•N a«en•r. wu ewtr..aeler•se. • Nrueri.ru er • uu...:.y • .F•4'` rane•nt •e to «ne•Na ema.r er li~t•a io •w Nm u• er R0~ r"• wi i ean: :e o ie°'rtr te:ee.e: .ui i°ieei to°: 1a ie ° :eai rv:` :w ei ~ )i•uia ia~ ea:).+: i~.~ iawta~ e9 tl •s` t a, w4 ~ Na. ~ eN.r a ..`w~ a.• a t:::+.,. r«t wove t« • a sr 4•t.w rNa rNfN e b~ ~J. mrtet • Ir WI••e •)U • aNfm giB e..rua i~ i toi• sr v .+w~ i•.a o o Ne1.°.iu°. na•r u GRAPHIC SCALE et9tsta ?~s` tp i a• D u e, e•.a. .or r. or l ~a rnr 1^ <J ^''p'K~ • rr D) "fir 49" .~ga°n , LsD.tt Duceirrror - Lor . xln rL1e wnan u°aL Dawlrt le••- wr xe xlu ran wm) L°t bdL « u Let < aeaa +e. r•u letuwmNle e~i or alvpl 1 w 11 Lee a. alwe lo. raa .lees r.w iet~ee /aA• 0 Nl.iei ~ae•el• Nmir. Nurus. N nwrew tl te• of ride oia ve• e•o ••e •~et~ea reiio.• o o eloraeo. r• • D•ruen•nr ar cnwe . '•''r rk tyt°nt .or• Danlwira tie ereo.ie:• :w. ra uo.~r• ayu Nyw. Nu.ue. .er ial• a oar. ° `ca'r r° _ u - - ~ r r e e anoasue . <r er nl° L.L n .N o•lu t oe s ` oP •/.I j~•` D • a• ¢••A C°1 ee. a eR~ OP iax0.01 r..i°•ie~ tie. uri. 're'•aii i'I Ueee r •iea ii to . i.iei eoe ii. Deice .it• m J + pe rr °r° °eilD°er ° Lot . •L«w oe u• err NI• ' •lo• m• .r eon r... t a.+'r ' Lot p co c °OC '•ei'rie a ••s la r s ww r oer• crme ~ .~°,:r~1.°et. 1 ;0 0o r. i'o : Nl i e ut r rre«nr ltae a fe teJ Drei•rer'rex ~eirJ.J9 r • e• 1 e1• to• f1• a )r.u ~••a to . • ° L ix{t New . • w• ~ x• vli°~ : 'if• t•t cal F b .-Dr~Nrte u.•+ r . wt <; w.o. ~x.• r:: .rNL ae <n..:a .r. re . ieo:x: . ei r ie~•io%r. r•e ro )e ~s`wi lw ••N . t n + ey a +x.e.oo r r:alr• a n.Nte e Y La • t~DJ iu eoere.'s:et.rioorr~eot'i•eere Leiiol ie Stu ii:es °••Oe ~ ' ee< rt e+/ sr a • e e e••new i ~+'ti uN oD•ui):oe i ie in. a~w• ieo is ire. pr iose. bt v D•u r o o• e)• • •rn.wly ua ro.1 a i• • .'•,°ee µ-M t ee)e + ox• r ».Ner• a ••a• i :i• r .ix l„a, a . or Fd` at)~^ Su.' - ai, e f NpYNe. aU1 Nr I •r fl•y s~;r~ "t~ ~ cmulmo<t~sJ+t.<. r.•t..aeJ •er • wr er 1•••. ~ Irk ~y~ '••e.v. Lwu Inaumaa - LN n un ran aumlr u••L olronrno. - to.) tua nn ulwov • N.<u .r u.e me•e« to aet v• • •r ae •tN I• Let f, a1Nt +e r•Il let•rmayle D•r•1•N•at •u«Irl•1oa, 4el•Cemat 6te relameet )uylrnlDD. aNl• Omlt/. Cslsra0a. r•NNN Ie t0 ef'.e~ a•a ea r erl rt • ewer •e~[welarC p" *I - ~ ~ r «r• D•rticul<rlr es•erlt<a aM ra INS r• aNl• asmtx. Nl•fNe. •e rtleal•rlf aw DN m: ell <'fr ~mtr, C<teraes. t e t1)••r3 ~ r•• l IO'N ~e+y el ale N w aalet er N seNe o 1e• fa • le•aar• •f Nr•Lef Oen ~ ~t ~atNaae n.•f f••t ea r r Nn • Lot f•<a Dlm Deeta Y x)'tN• 1 p0. r+ Nfat o to et •y at' orY C ~ t\•«< a• mt• °uoe .X eyser ierie+ i ~i i:rte•a wme• a s)• o• s• a • ue : o•r .o~ ie• ~ ~<i.r r •ax•oe a it.n r•~a e • ooua o ie ai ni•6Orr art Nua a e• • l~ i iilNwor .<•r eev~ r• ° e r: u•lw ~f• + a• • :o.e9 ..u i<rl: t w• • •1 ie•t. ~ .'i :e e:e~ o d) of •ieei . ~ eu r.owrir 1 tow t me ae e• na • 1. er L ° t t s: ~ ~t r m x• • me.v a•t ti i•• a `ese• • r•t•e aae.e w ea•e•t)+•r: yJriei im en.J ier rer o• a• Nue ee w~w:u. • a Nr•al 'Deoeooe wau.Daiia •r ee rix y or l.Da <e•wely o.°o • ii.. a.J •er • um.1 .o. r••t. a<n• «r• a 1•.•. rrwo +o~e,` Lwl4 eatylrr[el - Ln )1 alw rLTa Ylwm a w erl a <•tN 1• Lea n. n«t +o. uu 1 nIa wi eutaai:w•. aul• term. caucus, . w1• e:mu, wurmo. _ .er:co.:rtte:i•:ia Deco .uo... eaeuae • oe . a n •w « Nut a nimlei~iN r:i~ + • ~xa• i +v.•+ r Su Jer1 CrM'ceh~ •ter.r DreD r.en NUtar la t Jr t'~ Nt•f oc tNm ,.s.w~ ~`~xuxw .r6••r «Cr ea •at J.. iS af••t tlaa a~ ~t)J• < OJNN) • ~r le•e ~•crmnr w. nsax D•tr D<D+r<rN ls+[ S•••Der h er • • c lee •wr L a t. •e• cea.eDe. M n.•ra• <<,qy Mer en PYr rrmM r rr«~,tn•1 ao • t .a, t 'j~ I Dy m• erne' uMr •M' rwr+lMn Aaw •we? ~ M ^'r +"yr .x •e rvei w D°• eeral••t.'C r< a t ;te <•t Y' w` < e„s q~ py N„y, ~y pyf w pN py er • t Lx: u•w• <o.N r tN are e' x•s.N ~ Doi u• n~oa i••ay • •suu • ~ o+• )o• .i~t_ wor< a a.r r .p wn.resx. aw e.rr. •b : uora a1• N• ie• i i~ 4'•• • l ' ~ a u•i °eo t•eerN Nr• er u•. ie Nrou sr •N eenu.ue +n ' - ' ; nxr'ex-r„ x Nsav rs rmro Iwre ~rraDr Bike Path so,~T 1007 ORAA'0 AL£A•UE. SU/IF T-E F-~-97 _ I SG I s~,~. LLI~ „ao, West Vail Bike Pa th M rJOJ~ D.!-IOO. rM'.J HIJ-39M Easements ,r. e, ~ w)P N, LO(ORA00 r. OJ) DTl-6777 R ~ w ~ 0E ORDINANCE NO. 23 SERIES 1992 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACQUISITION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER, ACROSS, AND UNDER CERTAIN PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN, FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE PURPOSES BY NEGOTIATION, AND, IF NEGOTIATION IS UNSUCCESSFUL, BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS. WHEREAS, the Town is in need of drainage easements across the property set forth in Exhibit A ("the property") for public drainage purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. The Town Council makes the following findings: The acquisition of the property is necessary for public drainage purposes and will serve the best interests of the public. 2. The Town staff is hereby authorized and directed to acquire the property by negotiation if possible. If the property can not be acquired by negotiation, the Town Attorney or his designee is authorized and directed to initiate and pursue eminent domain proceedings to acquire it. 3. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 4. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 5. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein, 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent 1 herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this day of , 1992, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the day of , 1992, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Ostertoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED by this day of , 1992. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Martha S. Raecker, Town Clerk C:~ORD9223 2 f EIIIIBIi A (conc.) • Inlr S floc. ae el«Y C, v,il v wre1M le lOnrenl, r :n tee glllreanl Ne ~o w t w•gtp iOi LOto]ee arol rasie bt~l0eeeeeN99~9'11°r Il le rn •lonq Nlaoulq ,t i0 ereeterly line PI r, ~ l0ence, dewrlllry NN awlMeeterl) line, N1.11'El•N f1.11 [Nl to IM wrlfnaterlY line 01 „+e let 2: t nN pli•91.00"[ 19.09 iNt, •lonq said lA 11 -lion eenr aelaNel • erll 1 n, eewrt=nq s ortYrerterl; Ifiae' S l^19'>l•E Id01.90~<e[, t mat Nrl el W 1/. Nwee t. 1,11 IINa. ,«erd{N a IN eNl IMTNf. egwdM t. IM teetwtMe terl ^ Ilw of ,i Wl a d'1°11'w•( 0. .oon'•aa w w er1Y plliN M IM BNN ire119• bINrN. .Nr1 ,w IawNtt. dewrllN N Iel lent IIN, to ! a w~ t e pegieei,q. ronlsl nl nq 6t a • a leer, erore w. \ Ny1NIN et tM INR eNteNi NfMr el said lei 11: l1a,q. e11•It'd0•i IO.fS MI. ,laN lM n«tlrwlttlY IIN M NU W 111 IMnee. d~NtiN~aN NTteNrNri) IIN. NI•g1'E)•t 6,01 twl; IMeN NIY1.61•i SI.II twl. let aw Nrlr IIN sl elfd 4ea 11; tSe,ra \ !I•SI'l11 N.N IeN. eleN wN ewllwnlerll IIN. !0 tM pIN al S,SININ. aNM1a1N 1Sl rgNre INI, wr• tt lwe. I..i ~ x \ H H ~I ANRU%INATE CENTERLINE UE UNDERGRWND STdiN 9EWER UNE i ` ~ a LOT 2 ~ r PO~ ~0 PROPOSED STORM BEWEP EA9EMENT / ~ / I ~ O ~h j . / / • / ~EasEMEnT PER pLAr \f` \ 4 I ~1i. ~ \ q ~ \ ~SIe,~ ~ ~ / j PaOEMExT PER BOON ! 6 F ~ E Od. ~ / J .'•E SCALE 1' = 20' \ e. ~ LOT 11 I Pvinl ,.1 ~.eginninq \ rl~ - PROPoSEO 9TOPMSEWER EASEMENT I PROPOSED 9TORM SEWER CA9EMENT / / " •rh / . f ~ LOT 3 / " "s. s PRGE"~ ¢i PER BOON 1q J / ^ \ I / 0h ~ h PROP09ED 910PM sEwER EASEeIENT~~\Y IoT 1q ~ ~ / ~ LOT 10 ~'p^ry mN ............t / ~ EA9EMEN1 PER 0.AT O(7P mN Nrl of Ml 10. SI«1 e, v,l l Aid9a rcgpNlN 1q IN N,l tMrwl, r«wrdN le IIe / PQ` olllr, el lM W N Ewn[T. ColendP. Clerl ,N 1•NrNr. Nrer11r1 N leilwr: / eN1uiN rl Ua Nat wrmrrlY corper qi uN bt 10: ueNe w191.11.6 N.w lwl. 1 / er Nrm.NNrb uN et .aia Me id: ue.rr. aew.uN a,u NrtM,aeNr uN. gw•w•is=e im l - ner. .e.er ......nl ~ `a.11 Nqt. N M awuN.NNr uw ql .Na lol lo: tM.ca aa•n•N-. u.el ewt, aPN a, 11 a«tM,aterlr Ilw: lemon, den,rtiN Nil awtNeatarlr IIN, NIW)'N•p 101.11 Iwt: I.If Iwl~•,IwEO a,ld lwrlewrtwl)ellN, to tie lrolrt sl eNININ` irN~t,le N 11EN Nwre T t 1. e..v e v e. amrt~,eMe to tie P e m the \ Iwl, a«e or INa. mu«~m e. ua eq , eemr.eo 1eja.N .N .e.r, o~.iew ,.w~ouo ;n.ee e.vmN.1efr ue ro n 1 t •u~lx•. 9 lq iee tn. ItM eol a Ueulerh i ie iwl. iie tbtheL epiAil% ee niss•lave•D li~ii lie Ia.ienq ova norlna..Nrir Inane, le lne rom~eei Ine,.mnq. re.umin n .N..e o-n. ror. er ie... STORM SEWER EASEMENT LOTS 2,3,10 & 11, BLOCK 3, VAIL RIDGE _ TOWN OF VAIL ` EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO awq xwMwu e ~ E,, ucLE-aAli ' PD. Boa +E~D mw.RDS. co. B10]E flol)gs9-+,oe 1858 h . ~ - ~ 9-i- 9,~ ~ST ~ /i9' ~ ~iG~~S ,~8~ l ~L~.vri•~.Q ~ ,~LO /~r~! /~~4d / ~S ~~s ~o~ ~~~S . 4. l~s~ f e ~UM i?.~,0-~~ EFT" ~y ~1 ~A~~~DS FO ?2 ~ V SEz . 1~?ys.4~ ~ N~tz..r~o.a ~ u ~rJi~o2~ ~oj2a/~os~ j Z a ~ SEs G?~ISTi N G ~ SSc ~ s ~-i-rrv ~vEZ/ 3 w L,OrV CEO ST I ~rS /~Qd~'nnr~~~S ~ Yiri~~ K~U~~LE ,Yt~.~G~iN6 ~ r ~'c/~~ T~'q M w~ t~isnNG S'~ ..._t. ~ ~ t~.y /~D JAN ~.bE.s, 'I b~US .PTO/`'. Z, /~Oll~~ VYAW~.1~ ADD~`rro+~AL l0 ~ ~ ~ ~dS ~'~v~S ,~s E3 ~X~s n~/b ,~,~E~i«Z ~n,~ yrlt t l..t._, ~qJ t1 ~ YLE c~ ~t s'r~2~c.~nv ~ 3. Faye ,~cc ~ s s OF A ?~ewr Bas 5~ P, ~ e ~t4~~lD ~*aG, ~ F AN'u'rtl{~2 ~ 3. IMP,eovE ~~4sr ~C+vNa S ~aS S+a~t ~lE 1NS~-q~T A N 2 F A JJ~~''11~~ ` 1 / 4, PA-~wAy is M~~~A~~t;,~ 4 , V..O^tSnz~JGT 1~1~ ~'YEST ~oU?•~~ ~i~ W?~JY~.~, ~s 8y ~s~ ~.A~ 11~t~~ ~s~v~ QEBut~ of Wo~n~l PaTM ~.1 H taE2 1`~~ S . ~ N r~"~at1_ ~/~'T~} ~ ~tJS S'i'0 A ~ A~ca-no ~1r~" '~-t'ou~.) RE*•(4 J ~t_ W ST ~St~MA'iE.`a D 11~N~~..~~~ I . I?-isna~~ ~Av-~t L~~r-ate ~~~,OL~ I ~L~M t NA'Tt'1 K1A~A~.D~~1S. ~US L. IMO~CodE ~dNO 8Us S~,D~ /2~ ADD Z, t~s~ ~+.~E. Ex~s„?..ty +05s~ ¢ . ~,i~`o t~~o~. P~.ss ~i-~~Ay 34, DDO uJooo 4~, X000 e~Nc~ J~ . ~1149k7 S CA$~ ~ V~I~T ~D~?'~D ~p~0'Nit_ Tl0 ~ ~Z~ ~JS ~ ~t~ t CE . 4. s~,~Poa.~s Pr~~ P~~ ~ ~ boo - 840 rte- -~rv g,~s s~oP ~~~°o o~ ,e~,ro ~~To~ ~ 3 . s-n`~. (L~~,+2..~.~y UA~~.A~aGZ sin ~~s ~~,c.E vF r~t~~E ~Sr~ ES1`i~rta'~E ~ , ~34, ~-Do ~2, ~DI~ Bas s-ro~' S~PP~~-~ a~.~,a~E sy ~S~ f3, ~2~ 3 3 ~-ts-r2:x-T ~1~s~1 ~ ~,Q~.J~S /~sflet !„ACE Q?as Stop ~4 DDD ~wDOo~ 4 . ~u ~Do ~rt> P~ ~ 4.. ~o~~o ~ ~ -r-~L ~9~i DZ.(o ~-i-~,~ 1993-1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS 1 Chapel Bridge Replacement 84,000 84 000 See 10 Relocate Back Flow Prevention PIT VTC 25,000 .(u Of~• ~ "h~ ~ ~ 25,000 2 Regional Bus Purchase Match 75,000 ~ ~ 's 75,000 3 ADA Improvements 50,000 ~ 50,000 50,000 50,000 200 000 4 Underground Storage Tanks 236,881• 236,981 TOTAL 234,000 50,000 50.000 50,000 236,981 620,981 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS FOR CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS OF EXISTING SERVICES 5 Fire Truck Replacement 310,000 310,000 6 Replace Buses 1.050.000 1.326.000 1.160.000 3.536.000 7 Replacement of old Mobile Radios Fire 15,000 15,000 8 Emergency Buiking Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 9 SVeet Improvement Mtce Program 617,000 807,500 1,797,330 1,891,060 1,903,510 7,016,400 10 Parking Structure Capital Maintenance 73,954 315,365 204,857 183,000 180,000 957,176 - 11 Town Shop and Bus Bam Mtce Program 390,000 370,000 400,000 375,000 600,000 2,135,000 12 Drainage Improvements 43,086 113,341 68,830 87,345 97,940 410,542 13 Bus Shelter Replacement Program 20,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 14 Electric Raceway & Library Carpet 35,000 35,000 - 15 Street Furniture Replacement 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 16 Computer Oriented Irrigation 100,202 100,202 " 17 Covered Bridge Replacement 155,700 155,700 18 Replace Carpet in Muni Building 25,000 25,000 19 Resurface Muni Building Parking 14,000 14,000 TOTAL 1,339,242 2,896,906 3,887,017 4,085,405 2,846,450 15,055,020 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS WITH SAFTEY ISSUES 21 Fire Extrication Equpment 16;000 16,000 See 10 Lionshead Parking Electric Generator 15,000 15,000 22 Second Radio Channel for Buses 16,000 16,000 23 Street Light Improvement Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 24 Pulis Bridge Replacement 330,000 330,000 TOTAL ~ 77,000 360,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 527,000 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS TO MEET INCREASED SERVICE LEVELS y OF EXISTING SERVICES i 25 Retrofit Buses w/ Perimeter Seating 17,500 19,348 36,848 26 InsffiII New Bus Shelters 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 27 Relocate Checkpoint Charie 220,350 ~0 350 28 West Vail Interchange Imp (Spit With State 50/50) 170,000 100,000 270,000 29 Automate East Vail Interchange 9,900 8,900 ---~30 HEF CapiffiI Equipment 163,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 363,000 31 Implement New Shuttle Buses 420,000 879,000 769,375 2,068,375 - c n <~f ~r r 5 ~ 32 Simba Run Underpass (TOV's Portion 30%) 210,000 555,000 765,000 33 Pay on Foot Express LaneVTC 21,899 21,899 34 Replace Liorshead Parking Equipmeri 131,888 131,888 35 Village Loading Facility 1.000,000 ~r..~..,n,,, 4,437.500 - ~ ; ~e `f' _ 36 Additonal Bus Purchase 221,000 244,000 465,000 P ` f 37 Pay on Foot and Express Lane Q LH Parking 98,830 98,630 TOTAL 600,7501 1,953,135 1,725,000 4,375,505 314,000 8,968,390 TOTAL OF THE ABOVE PROJECTS 2,250,9921 5,260,041 5,692,017 8,540,910 3,427,431 25,171,391 NEW INIIIATNE PROJECTS 36 Vail Valley Drive Ped Connections 308,023 277,546 131,700 717,269 37 Vail Road Medians 122,478 122,478 a 38 Vail Road Sidewak 45,903 45,903 39 Development Enhancements 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 450,000 40 Sidewalk Improvemer~ls 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 41 News Paper Dispensers 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 70,000 42 1st Phase of Town Cemetery 0 0 43 West Meadow Drive 82,000 897,400 979,400 44 Frontage Road Widening & landscape Medians t 11,000 537,350 648,350 45 Ford Park Left Turn Lane 338,155 338,155 46 Pedestrian Zone Signs and Monuments 127,500 106,500 234,000 47 East Liorshead Circle (Per StreetScape) 44,300 487,300 531,600 48 Fronffige Hoad Landscape Medians 122,731 122,731 49 Rebuild Entry to Muni Parking Lot 87,477 87,477 TOTAL 632,404 810,886 1,870,296 418,277 I 865,500 4,597,363 i TOTAL ALL PROJECTS 2.883,396 6.070.927 7,562,313 8,959,18 4.292.931 29.768 7~ 54 - ---r - - YEAR END FUND BALANCE ~ I 2,163,275 1,671,996 1,021,892 1,021,892 1,021,892 RBTT • Revised: 9/ 1/1992 TONN OF 9AIL • RRAL FSTATB TRANSFBR TAI • History and Budget 1992 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 ; 1992 1992 BDDGRT NONTR ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTOA6 ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTOA6 ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTDAL ACTDAL BODGBT ACTDAL 9ARIANCB Janaarp 63,999 98,089 106,981 119,972 78,053 80,733 101,374 131,916 95,119 309,233 162,954 165,141 ; 106,390 aa,23a ( 18,152) February 40,595 69,018 105,024 132,220 86,289 170,052 64,906 44,040 109,873 140,192 133,085 71,413 ; 89,120 110,960 21,840 March 59,88fi 126,935 109,533 137,820 62,693 63,831 92,557 38,791 68,104 145,957 77,995 183,698 ; 89,050 116,626 27,576 April 76,855 94,653 65,900 103,526 173,321 90,396 182,743 95,554 179,671 151,069 152,027 108,040 ; 114,199 213,245 99,046 Nay 42,738 84,324 54,663 90,599 96,006 228,673 98,651 120,984 99,736 220,299 167,972 96,994 ; 105,355 142,817 37,462 June 62,239 125,433 54,488 140,638 76,467 49,513 79,915 73,509 101,364 122,466 136,364 141,863 ; 90,688 138,852 48,164 July 49,367 186,110 104,262 68,539 157,598 88,528 70,441 47,949 126,537 125,675 75,169 132,042 ; 93,044 95,373 2,329 August 79,859 115,499 71,282 97,806 58,937 32,860 106,182 61,137 109,315 86,347 77,486 99,820 ; 78,503 91,695 13,192 Subtotal 485,538 900,061 672,133 891,120 789,364 804,586 790,769 613,880 890,719 1,301,238 983,052 999,011 ; 766,348 997,806 231,458 Septeeber 59,800 113,992 49,332 96,746 64,671 48,516 108,167 78,819 116,557 143,306 75,745 85,645 ; 79,184 October 108,510 154,000 42,498 122,546 88,732 109,633 93,860 124,291 177,360 241,393 118,986 258,974 ; 124,845 Nove~ber 102,623 107,768 81,698 91,385 105,109 74,909 89,047 114,839 241,866 165,964 102,210 268,394 ; 112,095 Deceuber 142,662 133,867 110,911 56,533 81,890 333,139 106,695 95,495 192,947 192,737 107,880 95,742 ; 117,529 TOTAL 899,133 1,409,688 956,572 1,258,330 1,129,766 1,370,783 1,188,538 1,027,324 1,619,471 2,044,638 1,387,873 1,707,766 ; 1,200,000 997,806 231,458 TAXI .XLS . - • Ji':iiii`:i%i rtiiii»r 1;1111:1:;:?:S: i[i?:;;.;.?` ` .':<`:<'::S:i;>_''[<`<..'2:2:;i ii<>>i:ia''ii:jaiii>;'<;:i?<i`i'>>_i?1'111;1:1;>':25'<>'i 5>``isi~~~~~2cY'i'>`:i'.<_:'>_<2 `~:?>i:i:iii:<i<2Y<?>Yf"i<< ~'i<<i<.<i~`'<'``~~~~`>`k`t'' ii 2''`'> ctnu :....67`~ 1:8€a...... ~i . ................;................4~15.7:5........7~E ..fix ..:::::.88.1.: . 4:.:::: . ~...........~~..~......................:89t1 ~ #7b3.1.~1~..1..1. :4:96...... . ..............>........<..~~................,...x`....1.7455 ......1 ~Q$ .fit....... ~i .79 Q4......r..... , ~,~5~...........d.. .................r... .............:.:..................................::..:.............:................................................::...........................................................:.:..:.......::........1;..............~...........................................:..... Feb ; } .............:.:.:.:........................................:.:.:::...:......................................................................................................................,~lz.~. 8fi.......,~9~<~~~.... ~.>.~3+yy. /j.......yy11. . jj''jj .......y[ ~f../y.. t?y.ryy . .........................................:..................................................................................................................................,..........................................:.....................v~,~w°' .............x.44`............5.0 o .........................<......:......977 828..1 (~84 8.I.4::1..1.87 5 ,..~(l..t. 31 ~i 135 ; 3.78 782;<l 84.:.7.:.;::.;:.::.....:.: ; p::.;:.:;.:: -~77.7 _ .....:.............................................................................................................:..........................t........4.........:..f. .:.1:. ..t15:.....1 .3x7.7. 7.~$.... ~ .)...1.8:.... ~ ~ ....~....:.....2>. 51 .$2tl ...2>.I.b7 ~00..:.t. 9 9 . J:::::::::......t........ t................<. ........_.........::.:................_......................................................................................:.:::,....::::::::..,........................,...........::.:r...:::..,..::.:..:::.1.FEt.u~u .............3.6.5:`.36..:..:.:::...8..7... o .355 A ril d3Q877::.:::.:425~yjy>:::>:~''~.`/~/.}('[~` <3t10......3~.9 54c4 ~l8a: 204 :..531 fi68 < : . - r~s(i7,{s8~.::::..: 63d 174 i_dtb:bd8 .:..:::.659 _ Ott:>::::::::>?684 ~i5d'::,: 30 ~,~y.:: 1 ~~7,378....156 588.:::::.]66 2 Y::::::::::: :.:::.::...............:...:::::.::.:::.:............................:4th.............<..................... &7......~~ 5.1:8.:::.~:1.:7`~#..56X.::;:.:;;:.;~ . .....................................,.................~t.5 54&.........236 359.:::::....5 . ~ .08.0!7 .......~65.OOt3 , . ~b~i .:8 . ,7 ~.........1.787::.::::::::::.6.87°x:.:.;:;..;.:::......:. b,~x rye ;:>::::>::::>::>::»:<:>::>:<:>:::; :::7 ; ; , ::::::::.:.:.:.:::::.:..:<_:.>..<:.::;.;::::;;:::; ::::>::::::>::>::><;<:.: ~:::<>::><.:::;::::;:.:::.>,>:.::::::::>::»::::> >;:::isl:>::>:<:::>1:::::::::>::::::::::>:>>::>:>;><.>::>:; ,lu :.2~..,3~4~.....2~.~44.....2b2,.~. 9b.::... ~811~8ZS......~Cz.~., 62~...:.: 3~~: 58~....... 9.......:. 4 ...7 . : .........................................:......:................................................:..............................................,............329,.~~...........'u...8~~...£3......:.4.. 4 ..............:..:::...:::::::::::::::.::::::::::::.::..:::.:.....f..............~....................................:...1. _ t .16...._?107,.?~7~1 d.€3.6<.~[~2.::::..447~83:5::::: ~T9,507::::::?t7#?,~71.::,>;:.559 683:::::::..~1..~.3. . T ..........b .:~}>...39........6>09~[ 737±~88~ :::.:::7~C3rE)~:::::::.:~2€1 `,t'93::>:::> .SSt ~07 - ~ f 2,31'~0.........7..~5~G Total 3 315 74 6 3 567 788 3 968 288 4 4 , 10 201 4 6 0 - - 70,787 5,060,025 5,532,796 6,792,755 7,176,545 7,575,947 8,001,500 7,609,227 (392,273 0,44/0 -4.90% 348 75 :.::::.::::::.:.::.:>::>~::.::.;;:.;;;:.;:.;;;;:.;:::;.;:.:::.::.:;;:;::::;::«:.;:.;:.;::.:::;:.::.;;;::::::::::::>:::::>::>::>::>:<::::.;>::::::::;:.>.;:::<:::::::>: Au ust , 9 6 384,338 402,792 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 668,119 678,071 761,992 810,000 September 268,598 324,670 384,864 340,102 374,060 442,402 422,502 469,032 482,328 491,684 490,000 October 223,830 198,614 206,248 209,282 237,504 273,951 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 375,000 November 245,894 281,704 310,588 229,083 376,657 386,270 376,235 430,820 438,731 428,086 450,000 December 737 506 853,100 906,758 905,955 1,167,280 1,245,612 1,455,948 1,615,278 1,625,219 1,691,7751EE 1,764,000 E ~ `;;111'"`:li ill:;::111:11:1:11;1:11;`>:' ~s2'''`'" i~i_'_1 2':i`>'>'i?ii``'' Total 5,140,330 5,610,214 6,179,538 6,481,608 7,338,801 7,945,164 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,890,500 Page 1 SENT ",,EAGLE COUNTY ; 8-27-92 ; 13:10 ; 3033287207- 3034792157;# 1J 7 August 27, 1992 10:25 EAGLE COLIN] Y RUIL1NN(i ' 151 RMA0WAY .I OFFICE OF THE P.O. BOX 850 WARD OF CORM NSIONERS ; m(i)E, COLORADO 81631 8303) 328.8605 FAX: (303) 329.7207 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO AGENDA B0.4" OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING DAY moNDAY, AUGUST 31, 1992 09;00 -10:00 WORK SESSION - WI t X UPDATE NT of *t HOT.YCROSS RMV Janes R. Pritze , County Manta 10:00 -10:45 WORK SESSION - CONCERNING PROPOSED ACCOMMODATIONS TALL FOR MARKETING PURFOSE S MT Of dw HOLY cww R0av Steve ShWey, Vkc Chairman Vail VaUey Marketing Board 10:45,11:00 ***BPJL4K*** 11:00-12:00 PUBLIC HEA IU NG - RELATING TO PROPOSED RRFINANCING PAIL ASSOCIATES AND BEAVER CREEK ASSOCIATES BONDS $ACE cowaywom Kevin. Lin", County Attorney 12:00- 01:30 ***LUNCtU*** PENDING LITIGATION MT aftheHOLY CwwROOM Kevin Lindahl, County AUmney i SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 8-2?-92 13 11 ; 303328?20?-~ 303479215?;# 2~ ? 01:30 - 01:35 CONSENT CAI,TNDAR ~c~rs c»rnvrYr ]7ESfS GSA R01171N8.dAID 1 SON-CdMROVBRS'lAL hTd1Y/1iL AR8 PIAi,BD ON T~ CON~1IF CALBI~iIR !~P AI,I.OW i'~ BGmIRD t'~IF' COUNTY .n+a,ul ~u,u3 TU SPA lTS IIMS M?l~ ~+GY ON Af41~ LNPIQ1tT,tNl ITi~KS ON A f,F.Jt...,sa ~1GEl~Erl. elNY taUJfliQS.~011~@ NdY7UB".4T TTIr1TANl7~ ~ "R8M4T'ffi,1' FRPJ1d ~ G~Dll~e~s CAd dND ~ ~PdRATBLY. dM' J?fBd[[~i' GR' TTY 1°U~IIC LGIY •!~&QU1f,S7'~ el NYI78Al ~E 'R811t'OY~' l~Gllf THE G~N~'JVT'AOS1YlJd. 1. ~I~+ PlIIYING' Li11(la PBnkUClt, le1C~AUntI11~, Latry Clever, Cantr+oU~ A~.. x'„p21i: Approval subject to review by the County 1lriana~cr. 2. PAYROLL FUR Sr,:rr'Y~~iBFR 3, 1992 James R. Frit~e, County Manager AC r. ~.~vlY; Approval subject td review by the County Maz?ager. 3. LIQUOR LL,~+TSE ~C' ARING - +~WAL - WOLCv 1' a MAIII~ET Al"VD WOLCUTTNIARI~~ LTD d!b!a WOI~C4TT LIQUOR Kevin Littdahl, Cryuaty Attorney . AV t SON: Consider apprc~vsl. 4. 1.iQiTUR Li~.'r.~~T51; i1EARIlVG - CHANt3E 7.'RAUE lwl"AME - FRt7M; RIiSTAURANT A'I:' SINGLETli.EE TO; JUl?iE CRF.~.K GRIIrL Kevin I ,indahl, County Attorney A~,' ~ rON: Consider approval. S. LIQIJOIt LI~~+TSE SEARING - IiEh,elvr~AL ~ ~n~ ORCHA1tD INN COI' Kevin l~indahl, County Attorney AC~'IUN: Consider ar,~~~M 1a1. 6. I.IQ~TOR Li~r.~ ~iS~ HEAR.IlYG - REND rev AL - SONNENALP; PR4~ ~~,+.5 dlbta DUNE CREEK +~RILL Kevin Luula6l., County Attorney ACTION: Consider approval. T. DIVISION OF y~~,a.~,tAANS AFFAIIt15? !Cv.~?~1+1'T"S~ v~ir..,+:AN3 SERVICE Q~CER'S MU1w i raLY REPORT AND k,.~ r ia+aCATIU1Ml (}F PAY Ja~c1c 7ohn$on, Veterans Clfficer A..1 ~..N: Consider s1, ~ ~ era[. . SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 8-27-92 ~ 1311 3a332872a7-~ 3a34792157~# 3/ 7 01:30 - 01:45 API'LiCA1'~ON BETR~,.#' EAGLE +~OUNTY, STATE OF C+OIARADO AND ~ra~r STA'I'.E OF C[1LICJIRADC! FC1R GRANTMONIF.~FGIRR~ ~.A?CENI~1TlRE1LITATION +OrF BRIDGES ~AG307-10.~ EAST AND WT~ST ~Gl' ~ C+()NFLIJENCE BRIDGE, EAG-L~1-00.1 FOLAR 6TAR BRuiCE~ AN $0~ STAB ANIy ?A'~ 4"+~tJNTY 35T aware csauxr~r Larry Mettcrrviek, County Engine Don FessleT, Raad and Aridge Supervisor Ar„' Y ~~ON: Consi~r approval. Q1:4S -02:05 I~IQXTOR LICENSE HG+AR~I'G - h~~~ LI~~,~+iSE - ~~;Y;~,L CA,~ ~ Y AL C'GRI~ORATION t~vr~ cauNrrr Irvin Lindahl, County Attorney Ar,..'YY~DNt Consi~- approval. 03:30 - NpRTHWE?ST COLORADO COUNCIL t~F GC1~ ,~+Tl?~iV'rl~ QQ NOTING ~ ~ ~YYY GRAND, SUMIVIIT, AND E,~,.GI,E Ct1Ulw'~~5 ~ ~amsn~co, ~zcae,,utr THE Hsxr no;sriuva oF'rxe anw.s c~[mrrY COSiON~ wA.~,. ~ mt~.n oar ~ t, t~z. Tuns A~Ciffi~DA LS FR+C1VlbBb PCJit.INFORMATLDNAL ~ ONLY - ALL'1'1MBS ARF3 AF~Rt~7c1Mw'rR- TRS BgARD WHILB ]N SBBB~DN MAY w....s1D8R 4'l'~i~'R CAMS THAT ARB MtOUGl~I' BfiFORH iT. PAGE 3 I SENT BY~EAGLE CdUNTY ; 8-27-52 ; 13 12 ; 3Q332$72D7-~ 3034752157;# 4/ 7 August 27, 1992 - 10.57 kAC~E caUNTY t~pct~evG • y•~ ' • ~ " ssi sKVAawAv o~x~ of THE r.o. tax Bso BdARD ~ WMM155ND1~t& ~ • ~ EAGIC, CoLORIUiCf 6163 I 303 31S•86D5 .'1.y••'~•': ( 1 ` fAx: (303j 32S•l1UP h EAC LE ~~LlNTY, CCyL~O?RADO A~EI"V~1A ~QARD QF ~UUNTl~ COMMISSIQI'v~~S 1GUI.A.R 1LI~E''+TCar ~]A'1' TUPSDAY, SEr Y r.M~ER 1, 1992 09:00 -11:OU A~BA~:~~1T HEARIl~TGS ~er~ cnvivrr.i Cheriyn Baker Rudy G. Valencia Sdzedute number 04D06~S0 • AC'X'.~Ort: Consider approval. Ben~th L. Hull M.D. • Schedule number 04f 2075 ACTION: Consider a~..t..~~il81. Aspen Tile & Bath tiallery, Ito:. Scri~edule number 0429431 A?CTIl7N: Consider art „ .val. Al~w Clayton and Bobbie Jo Hoff Scbule number MU3A591 ACTIt~N; Consider approval. SENT $Y~EAGLE COUNTY ~ 8-27-92 ~ 1312 30332872Q7-~ 3034792157;# 5l ? $radley J. Higgins & de~uae 1,.. Sauer Schedu~ number 0023882 AC1'IUN: Consider appmvat. Jack A. Qleson Schedule number 0015520 ,!'~4.'Yi~u~1~T: Wider ei,.~~d31. George F. Proeming S~edule number {1024624 ACTiUN: Caasider appcavad. Buffalo's Schedule number P011636 ACYiu~N: Caosidea ~.~Nk~.~~ai. Renee and Craig Cambria $ch~dule number 10041 ACTICEN: Castside~r ~.~aval. Fsliza6eth S. Sutphin Schedule. number 11765 AC~C1N: Caasider approval. Ezrtes~ Lehrman Schedule number 0019738 A?CxkvN: Censider approval. Robert S. & Mary S. Pngleman Schedule number 0030462 Ati.;YYUN: Consider ~,r:,.,,~u:tl. Butterwick Entr..t,~;se Ltd n1 kJat App Park H ~ : ~ ,;~awners Assaciaatirnt • Schedule number 00027? ACTIN: Censider appro~?at. Hollis Allen • Schedule number 0022671,0021389 ~?cTlax: Consider ~~.~.~w~ rel. • Scott R. Willis Schedule number P~0(}7`977 ACTTt7N; Consider a~,,~~.w~,raay. Page 2 SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY $-27-92 ; 13,13 ; 30332872071 3034792157;# 6/ 7 x~1d~ Road, ion. Schedule number 0011574 ACTION: Consider ~lr r ~ ~ ral, k~agler:est, Inc. Schedulc number OOi 1592 ACTION: Consider ~ r ~ ~ rel. VV~.ync Rid, Inc. Schedule number OOi28$t'i2 ACTION: Consider approval. Jarn~s 8c Catherine O~ Schedule number 002$3$4 AC ~Yk,N: Consider ~rir- ~ ral. 11:00 -11:05 B1D AWARD F[}R EAGLE Ct)UN1'Y AIRCRAFT FiGHTIlrTG AND SNOW RF~.I~IOVAL BUII.DIl1iG ~ c~ouivrrRa~en~ Dan Reynolds, Aiipa~rt Mang ACY~~~~+i: Consider approval. 11:05 ~ 11:30 PU~.IC ARIbTG TO Ct~N5lDE1~ ADtI.~ s a~N 'OF` A 1'tFSCf?LU't'1QN SE'1''~'~'G AN ELY~CTI+CiP+T Td ~STABLISS AN ACCdMMdDATIdNS TAR I+'dR MARKETING PURPQSES Steve Shanley, Vice Cltai. veil valley ivtarketing Board ~ac;~ cxwnrrrxvr~r Consider adoption. 11.:30 - 12:00 G-69-92-rTEW YORK 14IQ?UNTAIN VA+~ATId1V &lCLE [10iiMYRal1N Phil ~CQtt, Bngin+~er':ug Department A~..',.~..yN: Consider a request to vacate certain rights-of-wa?y travexaing Dots 1, 2 and 3 in New York Mountain Project. (Thf~ ~ was tabled on July 14 i'or AS days) 12:00 - 01:15 ***LU1VCl3*** 01:15 - 01:30 REYL9E Yr.~, LEASE AGRrr.~~+lElw1T PDRM FOR THir ARFr1VA AND •+;~a.-. ~ r,. r. HALL t~lT Y.n.~. FAIIIGROUNL16 a~t~ cxwnnr Tom Solawetz, Assistant Building and Grounds 5upervisvY 01:30 - Q2:30 ~.CL i i ~E SESSION -PERSONNEL ~a~~, caaunr~r Rom e 3 SENT ~Y~EAGLE COUNTY ; 8-2?-92 ; 13 13 ; 30332872Q7-~ 3Q34792157;# 71 7 Q2:30 -03:00 Wta?R~ ~.aaSIO1V - M[1U1W'.~ SORTS 'I~A,NS~IRTA,~ak,nN PRU~T ur ~ ~ ao~r ceoss xa~ouu Dave L. Ruble, Jr, , Calc~rado cnt of Transporl~ion 03:06 -04:04 A. DRAW ~DN CI'~Y.~Aa~.aaA~. C1F Lr:a a OF C10yDl'I' N[ 32 FUR RUAD CUT PERMIT N[IMBER 1453 cornvzrr Brad Higgins, District C.~..~.,~inaior. Road adn Bridge ACTIQN: Ccrosider approrral. B, FD-293-9~-F-CQRDILLEitA, FII~NG f? ~so~ vavxrr~raat Sid Pox, .senior Planner, Community Deve~c~pment Ak.''i'a~UN: G~nsider ~.~x~~~ral. 04:00 - OS:00 WORD SESSION - ~r r,SYr EAG~ CUIJN`CX METRO REC. DISTRICT (FAIRGROUNDS arr of ~e 8raep [pass Rear THS.~ed?. ]h..:...~.1~3 OF1H8 EA~iLS COUNTY COMMI83IONBSB WIIL BB HELD O~1 y.~r~t,~~,~c..~t 1992. 'i'FIIS AGENDA IS 1~O1. , e~ ~ FOS AQPOIiMA.. ~~rAL PURPOSES ONLY - ALL TD~S ASS APPRCIJIDVIATE. THT BOARD WffiLE 1N SFBSION AlAY CONSIDER tii. r•r••~ IPBEdB THAT ARE ~OII©HT ~:.r~ ~r.B ir. FAGE•4 problem (where job growth really We anticipate that the greatest Our total annual budget for the occurred) before suggesting solu- obstacle would be the same one we department is $212,000, which in- tions. We spent over a year encountered: changing the thinking eludes salaries for three people but brainstorming the work program of elected officials so that they quit does not include capital overhead. with experts such as David Birch of looking elsewhere for their We have approximately $6,000 in M.I.T. (Job Creation in America), economic salvation and start nun- equipmentanda275-square-footof- Doug Ross of the Washington, D.C.- tuning their own entrepreneurs and five at city hall. Approximately 40 based Center for Enterprise innovative companies. The tools of percent of our total staff time was Development, and Phil Burgess and the project--computer databases, devoted to this project along with a Kent Briggs of The Center for the issues seminars, and a reference $20,000 database search budget. All New West who originated the con- librarian-can be implemented of the budget is funded by Littleton. cept of "gardening." anywhere. The only thing about the For further information, contact The demonstration project was project that can't be immediately Christian Gibbons, Littleton Direc- designed from the beginning to be duplicated elsewhere is a com for of Business/Industry Affairs, transportable to other communities. munity college partner. (303) 795-3760. O Loveland artfully markets ifs community Loveland's successful marketing arts and cultural events, and to test Our advertisements featured a plan for the arts embodies three es- a series of print advertisements the bronze and our "Loveland, A Work sential elements of innovation- city had developed for the cam- of Art" logo. They listed upcoming creativity, forging new partner- paign. The focus groups yielded summer events, such as an Ethnic ships, and realizing goals. valuable feedback, which we used Food Fest, outdoor jazz concerts, The city has been the catalyst be- to fine-tune our campaign. and plays, and told readers that if hind Loveland's effort to market its The Sculpture in the Park hook they called atoll-free telephone unique arts heritage. Loveland's In the spring of 1991, the aty ap- number (1-800-258-1ART) they reputation as a community of and would receive a packet of informa- forthe arts has grown, in part due to proached the Loveland High Plains tion about Loveland and one free an aggressive, public-private part- Council, a private, non-profit ticket to Sculpture in the Park. nership that has developed and car- organization which each August riecloutamarketingplanforthearts. Produces one of the best-known The Chamber of Commerce sculpture shows and sales in the connection Background country, The Sculpture in the Park The city also approached the The Loveland city council in- Show. The Arts Council agreed to Chamber with a proposition. The eluded $30,000 in the city's 1991 provide admission tickets to the city would install and pay for this budget to develop a marketing plan show athalf-price for the marketing toll-free Arts Line in the Chamber for the community. This respon- campaign. The show then became and advertise Chamber-sponsored sibility fell to city government since the "hook" for the campaign. (continued on page 28) no other entity had developed a marketing plan for Loveland. While the effort has been spearheaded by the aty, it has evolved into apublic- private partnership, with funding and tasks shared by both sectors. ~ ~ ~ The campaign A marketing committee, initially • made up of city staff, chose the theme "Loveland, A Work of Art" ~ ~ . for the campaign theme. The com- ~ ~ , ~ , ~ , mittee conducted focus groups in , , . ~ ~ ~ . northern Colorado to determine ~ ~ . . , ~ how Loveland was perceived, what kinds of information people want to ~ ; ~ . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ receive when considering a visit, ~ . ; ~ ~ ~ . ; ; ~ ~ and where people find out about Colorado Municipalities/July-August 1992 y7 events, if Chamber staff would traveling Sculpture Showcase spon- found less than half of these people answer the Arts Line, assemble the cored by Continental Airlines and had planned to attend the show information packets, and send them Loveland. It is being used this sum- before responding to our campaign, to callers. The Chamber readily sup- mer for spots on Denver's PBS sta- and 97 percent said they would rnme ported the idea and became another tion, Channel 6, and has been used back! In addition, many visitors at- partner in the venture. by the other funding partners for tended more than one event in Other private support purposes suited to them (for in- Loveland during summer after While plans were being finalized stance, Hewlett-Packard uses the receiving our calendar of events as for our advertising blitz in the sum- video as part of its recruitment pack- part of their information packet. mer of 1991, the city decided to cre- age for engineers). Conclusion Posters t-shirts and events ate an arts video using the "Work of calendars carrying the "Work of The "Loveland, A Work of ArY' Art' theme to promote tourism. The Art'• theme also were a part of the campaign demonstrates how a crea- city approached two arts groups- effort. five public-private approach to a the Visual Arts Commission and challenge can yield impressive High Plains Arts Council-for sup- So, did it work? results. Local governance does not port. It also brought a bronze Yes. In two and a half months last have to stick to mundane tasks, such foundry and Hewlett-Packard into summer, more than 1,200 callers as paving streets and picking up the funding group, as well as the responded to the ads, which were trash. Citizens also are served and Economic Development Council. placed in newspapers around assisted through programs that The city pledged $2,000 of its Colorado and the western United stimulate the economy and carve marketingbudgettnward the video, States. Astoundingly, more than 700 out a shared identity for their rnm- and the other groups stepped in people who received free tickets munity. "Loveland, A Work of Art" with similar support. A script was through the campaign came to the is such a program. written by city staff, avideo produc- show-and brought an average of For further information, contact tion firmhired, and a 12-minute arts three people with them. These Michael Rock, Loveland City video produced. The video is play- visitors came from 15 states and all Manager, (303) 667~i130. d ing around the country, as part of a over Colorado. Afollow-up survey Honorable Mentions: 2,000 to 20,000 Potiulation Durango provides a shelter f or the homeless Given the complexity of today's parking available near the court- provide additional parking fa- problems, resolution of community house and looked to the City of cilities, learned of the availability of issues requires creativity, determi- Durango to seek solutions to the property adjacent to its city hall and nation, and cooperation. Durango dilemma. a mere one-half block from the successfully resolved two disparate A seemingly unrelated event was entrance to the courthouse. The city community problems through unfolding in Durango's community purchased the property and began leadershipandcollaborationamong as the courthouse renovations plans for a surface parking lot. community-based organizations, neared completion. The need for It was quickly apparent that the public and private parfierships, shelter for our area homeless had dwelling on the property might be state and local governments, and a become urgently apparent. St. the answer to our need for ahome- spirited core of volunteers. Mark's Episcopal Church under- less shelter. This posed a series of lssues took to provide this service. Despite difficult questions: Would this In the late 1980s, La Plata County a valiant effort, the overwhelming house serve well as a homeless shel- proposed to move its courthouse need for funds, additional sleeping ter? Where could it be located? Who from the central business district to space, bathing facilities, a larger would rehabilitate the dwelling? a location outside the city. Citizens food preparation center, and Who would fund the services? Who mounted a successful campaign and rehabilitation services soon outdis- would provide administration and convinced the commissioners to the capabilities of the church management of the program? retain the service at its current site. and its scores of volunteers. With council direction to pro- m ara«:ng to accommodate citizen Solution Geed, city staff began its quest for opinion, the county commissioners Meanwhile, Durango, ever- answers. The city, needing apart- ~..r. essed doubts about the limited mindful of the county's challenge to ner, turned to Southwest Commu- 28 Colorado Municipalities/July-August 1992 " ' WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP August 28, 1992 Page 1 of 2 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 11/19 NEWSPAPER VENDING LARRY E./ANDY/MIKE M.. What can be done to make Locations for the newspaper boxes have been MACHINES these uniform and locations less prolific? determined and approved by all TOV departments. Staff will talk to Larry E. to determine if voluntary agreements or an ordinance outlining locations are appropriate. Working on wrap-up by November or December, 1992. 1992 01121 EVENING PARKING MIKE ROSElSTEVE B.: Evaluate financial Mike will prepare new analysis of data at Council STRUCTURE FEES ramifications of eliminating parking structure fees budget presentation set for 9/29/92,1:00 P.M. (request: Lapin) after 6:00 p.m. each night. 02/04 HERITAGE CABLEVISION RON: Prepare new letter of protest for Mayor's Will do. FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS signature. XC: Newspapers, Dillon, Minturn, etc. (request: Lapin) 02117 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTAN/ANDY: Draft ordinance. Consultant is doing research on more lighting concerns. An evening meeting Town site visit will be scheduled for September, 1992. 03110 AFFORDABLE HOUSING KRISTAN/LARRY E.: Finalize ordinance. Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1992, passed on first PROVISIONS ORDINANCE reading 8118/92, with second reading set for 9!1192. 03110 LIONSHEAD SALES TAX FIGURES STEVE B./STEVE T.: Packy Walker, on behalf of the Will investigate. Staff time now being spent on special (request: Osterfoss, Levine, LH Merchants Assn., is requesting an accounting of events/daily sales tax reporting program. Staff will Gibson, Steinberg) sales tax taken from a square footage basis, standard attempt to meet these other concerns after completion number (such as Dow Jones) of businesses reporting, to of the special events .program. offer a comparative analysis. - ~ WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP August 28, 1992 Page 2 of 2 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 04107 REVIEW RETT PEGGY/LARRY E: Schedule for Council review. Larry E. has received input from several communities in Colorado with land trusts or other land management techniques. This item has been scheduled for the 9/8/92 work session. 07114 U.S. WEST RON: Prepare letter requesting information on how U.S. Will do. (request: Gibson) West's installation of fiber optics will be used to transmit cable television. 08125 INVITATION TO CAROLINE: If we have not done so recently, remind Will do. COUNTY-WIDE remind organizations throughout the County that the Town ORGANIZATIONS Council would be delighted to make presentations re: (request: Lapin) Town projects, goals/objectives, etc., at their individual meetings upon request. 08125 PARKING ON KEN: Follow-up with Ceil Folz re: parking problems and FRONTAGE ROAD the recent Santana concert. Re-examine the issue of the (request: Osterfoss) Foundation's paying for CSO's to congenially direct traffic to the parking structures, assist with handicapped and elderly, and soon. 08/25 FINAL COMMENTS'ON PAM: With input from Tom, send letter for final record. EPA/MINE CLEAN-UP 08125 FOLLOW-UP PHONE CALL PEG/PAM: Mr. Shrader has called to find out whether there WITH BUCK SHRADER (CDOT) has been an improvement on the maintenance for the west side of the bike pathNail Pass. Although CDOT has stepped up efforts to clean and. maintain, their efforts have not. been consistent, and this was communicated by Pam. Follow-up phone call from Peggy to be placed the week of 9114192. u .9 TOWN OF VAIL ' O, ffiee of the Town Attorney 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 3Q3-479-2107/ FAX 303-479-2157 August 27, 1992 Mr. Bill Wood U.S. Forest Service Holy Cross Ranger District POB 190 Minturn, CO 81645 RE: Spraddle Creek and Golf Course Maintenance Parcel Appraisals ' Dear Bill: I am writing to confirm that the T~~u has hired David Lau, MAI, to do the review aNr~~sals .for the Spraddle Creek and Golf Course Maintenance parcels. Mr. Lau was chosen fig,,. the list of appraisers which were .received from the Forest Service. All of the listed appraisers were notified, and were asked to submit proposals for the appraisal. Mr. Lau's proposal provided for the lowest fee. I also wanted to confirm that the Town of Vail requested that the Forest Service share in the cost of hiring the review appraiser, partially to defray Town of Vail costs, but also to ensure that there could be no argument raised in the future that because the appraiser was compensated by the Town of Vail he would be in some way prejudiced against the Forest Service. As you are aware, the Forest Service has declined to share any portion of the appraisal expense. Mr. Lau is committed to completing his a~Y~«isal before December 1. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Lawren e A. Eskwith Town Attorney LAEIdd i'~ R~~~~V~ ~ ~ 6 1992 DISTRIBUTInN LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE GREG HALL MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCROLL CAROLINE FISHER JIM HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX DD DETO LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER KEN HUGHEY JODY DOSTER MANUEL MEDINA FILE MEMORANDUM T0: RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER FROM: LARRY GRAFEL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: AUGUST 24, 1992 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF AUGUST 24-28, 1992 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Conrad to recharge boiler at bus barn 2. Repair shoulders on various bike paths: a. Red Sandstone b. Golden Peak c. Hanson Ranch d. Timber Ridge 3. Paving a. Matterhorn Circle b. East Vail (Spruce Way) c. Bike Path at Ford Park (old snow dump) 4. Install signs: a. East end of VTRC b. Covered Bridge (install sleeve) c. Make signs for Andy 5. Clean all the catch basins Intown. 6. Flush culverts at various locations: a. West Haven Drive b. Vail Road (Websters) 7. Extend curb and reconstruct catch basin at West Lionshead. 8. Assist seal coat contractor with finishing rolling product . (possibly picking up rented roller in Denver on Thursday) 9. Take out Garden of Gods speed bump. 10. Pothole waterline at shop for snow dump contractor. 11. Raise concrete slab and brickwork at Lionshead. PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1. Resolve paver problems. 2. Receive bids on repairs of the expansion joints and the top deck of TRC. 3. Remove and replace handrails at LHTRC. 4. Assist Ski Museum with weasel and packer. 5. Repair vandalized sprinkler pipes. 6. Install ventilation in the lunchroom. 7. Inject concrete column at bus stop at VTRC. 8. Caulk joint on Charthouse stairs. CARPENTERS A. 1. Construct picnic pavilion for Stephens Park. 2. Construct Electrician's tool box. 3. Construct directional signs for Community Development. 4. Build wall for shelter at VTRC - west end. 5. Construct restroom building at Stephens Park. 6. Install totem for Stephens Park path. 7. Refurbish all bus shelters. 8. Install dog signs at Intermountain/Stephens/Staub parks. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Perform line locates as requested. 2. Investigate meter installation at Gore Creek Promenade. 3. Repair wire and conduit across from Garden of the Gods. 4. Install heat trace at VTRC Information Center. 5. Install new lights in East Vail. 6. Run conduit for fire detector for storage facility at VTRC. 7. Repair switches at fire panel at VTRC. 8. Change ballasts at Library. 9. Repair conduit at Lodge at Vail and Town shops. 10. Repair light in PW Admin. conference. 11. Perform inspections for Comm. Dev. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Install landscape material at Pedestrian Overpass. 2. Perform warranty walk-thru at East Vail Tues, 8/25, 9 am. 3. Revegetate Ford Park snow dump. 4. Hydroseed at 2516 Arosa. 5. Order light fixtures and drinking fountain for Ski Museum site. 6. Order bulbs for fall planting. 7. Check for and correct sign obstructions. 8. Clean up back shop area. 9. Order play surface material for Stephens Park Phase II. LG/dr PUBLIC NOTICE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCr~DULE SEPTEMBER, 1992 EVENING iVi~~TINGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at 7:30 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. WORK SESSIONS Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the Council, will now be scheduled at 2:00 P.M. on the alternatine Tuesday afternoons, i.e., the second, and fourth Tuesdays of each month. A brief overview work session for Council. will precede the regular evening meetings, from 6:30 P.M. - 7:30 P.M. '1'tl~ SEr i~MBER, 1992, VAIL TOWN COUNCII. MEETING SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS: Tuesday. September 1, 1992 Work session 3:00 P.M. (Executive Session) Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday. September 8, 1992 Work session 12:00 P.M. Special Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday. September 15, 1992 Work session 6:30 - 7:30 P.M. Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Thursday, September 17, 1992 Work session 6:30 P.M. (Budget Review) Tuesday. September 22, 1992 Work Session 12:00 P.M. (Work Session Items & Budget Review) Special Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Thursday. September 24, 1992 Work session 6:30 P.M. (Budget Review) Tuesday. September 29, 1992 Work session 12:00 P.M. (Work Session Items & Budget Review) Thursday, October 1, 1992 Work session 6:30 P.M. (Budget Review) TOWN OF VAIL Pamela A. Brandmeyer Assistant to the Town Manager ` 1')'ttQE.t9Ll~, fi't' 9 We're taking television into tomorrow X C : Ctli,~u.~i.~ HERITAGE ~ w~' A TCI COMPANY August 24, 1992 Ms. Margaret Osterfoss, Mayor Town of Vail 75 West Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Mayor Osterfoss: Starting September 14, 1992, Cablevision VI, Inc. will be doing business as TCI Cablevision of The Rockies. I wanted to take this opportunity to give you details about this and other developments in the cable TV industry and what they mean for cable TV programming and services in our community. Since cable first came to the Vail area, a revolution has taken place in local TV viewing. Customers now have access to a wide range of quality programming and more than 30 channels to choose from. -And that number could easily skyrocket with the technology advancements on the horizon. Nationally, cable TV is fast becoming the household information and entertainment medium of choice. Between 1983 and 1990, viewership grew 133 percent, demonstrating American Viewers' desire for up-to-the-minute, worldwide news coverage and an extensive variety of quality programming. Today, some 60 percent of the TV hours dedicated to children's programming r (educational and entertainment) are provided by cable programs. And 80 percent of TV viewers in a recent Nielsen survey said they watch more news as a result of cable TV. Fifty percent said they watch more documentaries, science fiction, sports and movies. a Since Cablevision VI, Inc. joined the TCI family, we've worked hard to give our viewers the best reception and widest range of programming options possible. Our Colorado-based parent company has given us the added capability to do even more. As America's largest cable operator, TCI has the resources, experience and technical know-how to fulfill its commitment to upgrading our local cable system infrastructure and expanding customer programs. At the same time, TCI has a commitment to customer service. In 1991 alone, the company invested $645 million or $76 per customer in system and capital improvements. P O. Box 679 249 Warren Avenue, Suite 250 Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 (303) 468-2222 FAX (303) 468-2672 An Equal Opportunity Employer l TCI Cablevision of the Rockies local involvement doesn't stop there. For example, with TCI's support, we're investing in the future of our community by providing commercial-free cable programming at no charge to local schools. In the near future, we'll begin to upgrade our system with improved technologies, such as fiber optics, that will provide increased channel capacity and many more program options for our customers. As TCI grows, the company is committed to its tradition of operating with an entrepreneurial spirit, keeping close to its customers and responding to their needs. We believe that TCI's involvement provides us with the resources and a renewed c~,~u??itment to operating an efficient, customer-responsive and technologically advanced cable TV system in Vail. I'll call shortly to answer any questions you may have. In the meantime, you can reach me at 303/949-5530. Sincerely, rJ anley F. McRinzie General Manager SFR/aw T ~ H ~ E DDLSKDI DRLLET ACADEMY AT VRIL • An Official BrBench of the Bolshoi Ballet Academy of Moscow August 28, 1992 Ms. Peggy Osterfoss Mayor - Town of Vail 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Dear Peggy, Thank you so much for your support of the 1992 Bolshoi Ballet Academy at Vail. This year's-performances were exceptional; the addition of the Prima Ballerina of the Bolshoi Ballet certainly made them even more exciting and beautiful. Our sponsors and patrons are what makes a program like this possible; you are tine backbone of our organization. We are looking to expand the Bolshoi program next year, and hope that we can count on your continued support. Thank you again. Sincerely, Jo Garnsey P sident P.o. s~X 309 Vail, Colorado 81658 ~ , 303. 476. 9500 Fax 303. 476. 7320 A Program of the Vaii VallEv Foiindarion i . T~- TOWN OF VAIL ~ , 75 South Frontage Road Office of the Mayor Yai~ Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 August 30, 1992 Mr. Gene Taylor Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 999 18th Street, Suite 500 Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: Proposed Plan for Eagle Mine Site: Surface Water, Ground Water, and Wetlands Area . j Eagle Mine Site, Eagle County, Colorado, June, 1992 Dear Mr. Taylor: The following represents a summary of comments made earlier at public input sessions by Tom Steinberg, Council member and designated spokesperson for the T.,~u of Vail, in regard to the groposed plan for the Eagle Mine Site. These comments are herein summarized in writing. 1.. Propose that the Rock Creek Diversion have an impervious liner to the Eagle River. 2. Propose that clean water be diverted above the m~.ne at Red Cliff to dimznish the flow through the mine. 3. Propose lime water be injected at Red Cliff in an attempt to precipitate the minerals in the mine. 4. Propose the Minturn water wells be moved. 5. Propose studies should be done on hydrology of the mine, oxygen saturation in the mine water, and a reassessment of the feasibility of pumping this mine dry and keeping it dry. 6. Propose the addition of an impervious liner to the roaster piles before the fill and a Mr. Gene Taylor Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency August 30, 1992 Page 2 seeding should be considered. 7. Propose the diversion of water around the waste rock piles and the burying of waste rock piles should be considered. 8. Propose that if the Maloit Park Wetlands must be moved, they should be replaced with new wetland forming material to act as a natural filter between the tailing pile and Cross Creek. 9. Propose the wetlands should not be moved until the CTP is capped, good re-vegetation is accomplished, and a new effective diversion ditch is r~„~ en sufficient. 10. Propose alternative treatment techniques for waste water treatment should be studied in an attempt to reduce the volume of sludge production. 11. Propose the buildings in the Town of Gilman should be investigated for asbestos, and a.plan should be developed to dispose of this material so it does not get into the water and air of our community. - 12. . ,Propose that studies and an open discussion about heavy metal contamination in the stream bed of the Eagle River should be undertaken. E 13. Propose a voluntary blood lead sampling of students and staff at the Minturn Middle ' School and trailer park should be offered on a cost free basis. 14. Propose if the mine is not drained that an emergency preparation preparedness plan should be developed in case of a catastrophic water release occurring at the mine. 15. Propose under the suggested alternative for the Eagle Mine seepage extraction that . this be added to the Tce Drain/Collect~'I~eat/DivertlI~ock Creek. 16. Propose the acceptable level of zinc in the Eagle River should be lowered to a level consistent with viability of all trout stages of life, as well as enough invertebrates to sustain a normal trout population year round. 17. Propose the studies on the Eagle River chemicals PH and biology should continue on at least a monthly basis until the river reaches a steady state, and then, subsequently, during the low flow months for an indefinite period of time. 18. Propose a permanent plan should be evolved to protect against any future development on areas of contamination or potential mine subsidence in activity. 4 r r' j " j r Mr. Gene Taylor Remedial Project Manager U.S, Environmental Protection Agency { August 30, 1992 Page 3 One such suggested option would be for the EPA to give guarantees to either Eagle County or the State of Colorado that these entities would not be liable for future clean-up or catastrophe costs. The governmental unit would then take over the tag certification, claim the land, and under a deed restriction required by the EPA, turn any impacted or potentially impacted area into a wildlife preserve with accessory uses such as railroads, bicycle paths, and river recreation allowed. The Town Council for the Town of Vail feels strongly that all of the above recommendations f be considered seriously. We will await, eagerly, the outcome of your findings. Sincerely, TOWN OF VAIL - Margaret A. Osterfoss - Mayor Thomas I. Steinberg Councilman i , f r ROY ROMER Tekfaz Numbtn: " Governor Main Building, Denver ° , Y-., (303) 322-9076 ~ a/~ PATRICIA A. NOLAN, MD, MPH Ptarmigan Place, Denver ~ , (303) 320.1529 Executive Director l:tnt National Bank Building, Denver (303) 355-6559 ! jt~ Haurdous Materials and Waste Management Division Grand Junction Office T ~nAM 4210 East 11th Avenue (303) 248-719g ~WI~J.1lJ Denver, Colorado 80220.3716 Puebb Office DEPARTMENT (303) 331-4830 /FAX (303) 331.4401 (719) s43-8041 OF~HEALTH MEMORANDUM R~CEIYEa ~I~G ~ 1 19G2 TO: Interested Parties CJ FROM: Dick PVarac~ agle Mine Project Manager DATE: August 26, 1992 SUBJECT: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -July 1992 (EAG 7.1.6.3) The following is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program during July 1992. The airborne particulate data collected by the Paramount air monitors shown in the accompanying table are preliminary in nature. This means that the Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) values may be revised after auditing and validation by the air contractor and the State. The information is useful in assessing emissions during this time period, as well as trends in potential human exposure. The monitoring frequency during July continues on the one-in-six day program. Metals analysis is temporarily suspended until startup of construction activities in the spring. Both of these changes are allowed by the Remedial Action Plan and have been implemented in past shutdown periods. The concentrations for TSP were not above the air emissions permit levels during the July monitoring period. The notation ug/m3 stands for micrograms per cubic meter. A microgram equals one millionth (1/1,000,000) of a gram. Site activities in July were associated with collection and transfer of mine seepage and other contaminated water to the Consolidated Tailings Pile. The water treatment plant has continued to treat this water and discharge it to the Eagle River. Sludge generated from the treatment plant continues to be deposited on top of the Consolidate Tailings Pile. Construction activities at the Roaster Piles and the Consolidated Tailings Pile are scheduled to begin in August. For additional information, please contact Dick Parachini (331-4801) or Marion Galant (331-4855). Attachments ~ DP/dp pisred on rseycJd nu DAMES & MOORS AFFILIATED NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ~ 1125 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO.80202=_'027 (303) 294-9100 FAX: (303) 299-7901 RECEIVED AUG 3 11992 August 13, 1992 Mr. Richard Parachini Colorado Department of Health Eagle Mine Pmject 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 Dear Dick: Enclosed are three copies of the July 1992 Airborne Particulate Concentrations Report for the Eagle Mine site. We would emphasize the provisional nature of the data and the fact that revisions may be made after auditing and validation. Sincerely, DAMES & MOORS ~t~u Brian Kiernan Project Manager BK/alb cc: Howard Roitman, Remedial Programs, CDH Douglas Ikenberry Bob Winn Bob Neukirchner . , : Dave Warren ~ , Barbara Lewis - = Daryl Longwell ~ ' ~~'C~j~IE~ ~~JG 3 ~ 1 AIRBORNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS EAGLE MINE SITE JULY 1992 lw9/m') DATE SCHOOL SITE NORTH SITE SAMPLED TSP I~g/m'?_ TSP lun/m3y• 07/05/92 16.9 25.2 07/11 /92 17.6 17.5 07/17/92 13.6 ID 07/23/92 12.8 16.7 07/29/92 17.9 27.7 ID =Invalid data • Permit limitation is 150 pg/m~ These data are provisional and subject to revision after auditing and validation. 1 A RESOLUTION i SERIES 1992 A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITON TO PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 2 ~ WHEREAS, the Town of Breckenridge is a home rule municipality; and ' WHEREAS, Ballot Amendment 2, as written, would remove the power of local ,voters to determine what laws are appropriate in their own community; and WHEREAS, the Town continues to affirm and uphold powers inherent in governing as a home rule municipality; and a WHEREAS, Ballot Amendment 2 as written imposes a mandate on local governments by limiting powers to enact certain types of legislation; I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE, COLORADO and on behalf of its citizens, opposes proposed Ballot Amendment 2. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 25th day of August, 1992. ATTEST: TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE Mary Jean Loufek, Town Clerk ~ Stephen C. West, Mayor APPROVED IN FORM ~ Town Attorney Date i ' i T~ I 9 i 4.