Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993-01-12 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
c-~. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1993 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. BBC Management Systems Assessment. 2. PEC Report. 3. DRB Report. 4. Review of Draft Contract for the Purchase by TOV of the Vail Commons Property. 5. Discussion Re: TCI & Tri-County Cable Television Franchises. 6. Information Update. 7. Council Reports. 8. Other. 9. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/19/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/19/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/26/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:WGENDA.WS VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1993 2:00 P.M. tN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 P.M. 1. BBC Management Systems Assessment. Steve Barwick Background Rationale: Town staff will present an approach to management systems changes which addresses the problems identified by the BBC study. 3:00 P.M. 2. PEC Report. 3:10 P.M. 3. DRB Report. 3:15 P.M. 4. Review of draft contract for the purchase by TOV of the Vail Larry Eskwith Commons property. Action Request of Council: Comment on the draft contract. Backaround Rationale: TOV has been involved in negotiating this purchase with Hud Wirth for several months. 3:35 P.M. 5. Discussion Re: TCI &Tri-County Cable Television Franchises. Larry Eskwith Action Requested of Council: Advise staff on the advisability of bringing in Telecommunications Management Corp. (Carl Pilnick) to help negotiate the TC1 &Tri-County Cable Television franchises. Backaround Rationale: TOV is in the position of having to negotiation franchises with two cable companies. The expertise of a consultant would be helpful, and his fee should be reimbursed by the two cable companies. 3:55 P.M. 6. Information Update. 7. Council Reports. 8. Other. 9. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1!19/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/19/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1126/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:WGENDA.WSE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION JANUARY 11, 1993 AGENDA Site Visits 11:30 AM Public Hearing 2:00 PM Site Visits 11:30 AM The Valley Lauterbach/1335 Westhaven Drive Crossroads/Family Entertainment Mountain Haus Berkowitz Public Hearina 2:00 PM 1. °A request for a work session for the establishment of a Special Development District, a ' CCI exterior alteration, a minor subdivision, a zone change, and an amendment to View Corridor No. 1 for the Golden Peak House, 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lots A, B, C, Block 2, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Golden Peak House Condominium Assoc./Vail Associates, Inc./Partners, Ltd./Margaritaville, Inc. Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin 2. A request for the establishment of a new zone district called Ski Base Recreation II. Applicant: Ron Riley Planner: Mike Mollica/Tim Devlin 3. A request for a conditional use permit to allow a major arcade (family entertainment center) to be located at the Crossroads Shopping. Center, located on Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village First Filing/141 East Meadow Drive. Applicant: Charlie Alexander Planner: Tim Devlin 4. A request for variances for site coverage and setbacks to allow the remodel of a residence located at 315 Mill Creek Circle/Lot 2, Block 1, Vail Village First Filing. Applicant: Howard and Judy Berkowitz Planner: Shelly Mello 9. Review of staff policy on vending carts (ie. espresso carts). Staff: Tim Devlin 10. A request for a work session to amend Chapter 18.32 and Chapter 18.38 of the Vail Municipal Code relating to uses allowed in open space zone districts. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Jim Curnutte TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 25, 1993 11. Approval of December 7th and 14th PEC minutes. 12. Discussion of PEC board members terms and retreat. 13. Up-coming Eagle County Land Use Plan meeting on January 14th, Christy Lodge, 7:00 to 9:00 PM. M DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA JANUARY 6, 1993 3:00 P.M. SITE VISITS 1:00 P.M. 1 Regal - 1079 Sandstoae Drive. 2 Dauphanais - 1500 Lionsridge Loop. 3 Zell - 2161 N. Frontage Road West. Cortina Chalets - 2662, 2672 1.2682 Cortina Lane. 5 Curtin Hill Sports - 174 Gore Creek Drive/The Lodge at Vail. 6 Vail Ski Rentals/Cumin Hill Sports - 254 Bridge Street. 7 Cinnamony Buss - 241 Frontage Road East/Nail Transportation Center. 8 Strauss - 483 Gore Creek Drive. 9 Ralkus -.324 Beaver Dam Road. 10 Belton - 1034 $omestake Circle. 11 Lawler - 4939 Meadow Drive. •.•:.:::irx•.:.::•::•:.::•::::...:: • :::.:.:::::...:•.:;..x.:.a: ~.,;:.:::::.:~.:::::a:.:•;.:::..............;-.:::-:::::. ..:•:.yw:~.:...•:aas••.,...•:.::::.ino• tr'f:" ::.y';:;:^ryr.}f :}}}r:'.W:tG:;~ r.. ~::acnar •?:oi:Y.•::i ri.:.........:....:..... 3:,~.c•: r ::f v~..n....td....n AWu...h •:i . :.r ..............:::.::::.::.•.:::..c:•r `.::;5.::::::k::. -........,..:.,F:w,::.:..sva:.•+.%.•::<:i::~:a>w:2~:;::.:,..:,.wxknf::::::::: f:: iSixvs`4.o>:: x{alziYi3i/ivY,i AGENDA 1. Curtin Hill Sports - New sign. TD 174 Gore Creek Drive/The Lodge at Vail. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Approved with condition: Remove crest that protrudes down into doorway. 2. Gordon - New primary/restricted secondary residence. TD 2632 Cortina Lane/Lot 5, Block B, Vail Ridge. MOTION: Bob Borne SECOND: Mike Arnett VOTE: 4-0 Approved as submitted 3. Vail Ski Rentals/Cumin Hill Sports - Sign variance. TD 254 Bridge Street/Lot I, Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Recommendation of approval of 3 signs up to 20 sq. ft. Signs to remain: 1) Free Standing 2) Hanging Sign (fix mount) 3) One (1) Awning Sign Conditions: One (1) awning sign to be removed; hanging sign to be removed until Town Council approval; window signs to be brought into conformance with code - only 8 are allowed and 20+ currently exist. AK r 4. Perkins - Add deck and door. ' 1610 Sunburst DrivelVail Golf Course Townhomes, Unit #25, Building #7. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: STAFF APPROVED 5. Harley Residence - New single family. ~ 1873 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 2, Block 3, Lionsridge 3rd Filing. MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND; Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Approved. 6. Zeli - New sign. SM 2161 N. Frontage Road West/West Vail Mall. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Consent with condition that awning be coral to match building posts. 7. Dauphanais - New single family residence. SM 1500 Lionsridge Loop/Lot 22, Dauphanais/Moseley Subdivision. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Mike Arnett VOTE: 4-0 Approved. 8. Avil Property - Remove 50' evergreen tree and JC replace with five 10' spruce and pine trees. 4998 Meadow Drive/Lot 19, Block 7, Bighorn 5th Addition. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Mike Arnett VOTE: 4-0 Approved with Condition that (1) 8 foot, (2) 10 foot, and (2) 12 foot Colorado Spruce be planted in the Spring with a letter of credit for improvements given to Town of Vail by 1/30/93 in the interim. 9. Straus - Remove existing 30' spruce tree and JC replace with five 8' tall Aspens. 483 Gore Creek Drive/Texas Townhouses, Unit #5-A. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved: 3 Aspens - (2) 2" caliper and (1) 2- 1/2" caliper. 4 ° 10. Kelton - Remove 25' spruce tree and expand window JC on south side of residence. 1024 Homestake Circle/Lot 5, Block 6, Vail Village 7th. MOTION: Bob Borne SECOND: Kathy L. VOTE: 3-0 Table to 1/20/93 11. Regal - Conceptual review of new duplex. JC 1079 Sandstone Drive/Lot A-3, Block A, Lionsridge Subdivision 1st Filing. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Conceptual Review 12. Lawler - Revised parking and landscaping. SM 4939 Meadow Drive/Lot 12, Block 5, Bighorn 5th Addition. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Tabled Indefinitely 13. Cortina Chalets - 3 New single family residences. TD 2662, 2672 & 2682 Cortina Lane/Lots 7, 8 & 9, Block B, Vail Ridge. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 3-0 Table to 1/20/93 14. Cinnamony Buns & d'Coffee Beanery - New sign. TD 241 S. Frontage Road East/Nail Transportation Center. MOTION: Kathy L. SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 4-0 Consent approved. 15. Kalkus - 250 GRFA addition (Conceptual). TD 324 Beaver Dam Road/Lot 19, Block 7, Vail Village 1st. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Conceptual Review MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Kathy Langenwalter Ned Gwathmey Michael Arnett Bob Borne George Lamb STAFF APPROVALS ~ Silver and Sand - New sign. 227 Bridge Street/Covered Bridge Building. Vail Trails East - Trash dumpster. 433 Gore Creek Drive/Lots 9 -15, Block 3, Vail Village 1st. Garton's window changes - Add 6 windows to the east side of Crossroads. 143 E. Meadow Drive/Crossroads Mall. Vannatta Townhouse, Capstone Unit #2 - Portable/moveable spa on existing deck.--.1817 Meadow Ridge Road/Lot 21, Buffehr Creek Filing #2. Slifer Collection - Christmas display window. 230 Bridge Street/Slifer Building. Lario, Inc./German Larrea - Interior 250 and minor fenestration changes. 100 Frontage Road East/Nail Village Inn Plaza, Phase III, Units 304 & 404. Alpenrose Restaurant - Various fenestration changes to south facade & new copper roof. 100 Frontage Road East/Nail Village Inn Plaza. Sonnenalp Swiss Chalet - Satellite dishes. 20 Vail RoadlLot K, Block 5-E, Vail Village 1st. ~ ~ ~ .r. - . The primed Cordon: o[ thic form aC roved by the Colorado Real Citrate Commiction ((;1353 5/89) T111S 1S A LEGAL INSTRUMENT. IF NOT UNDERSfODU, LEGAL, TAX OR OTI IER COUNSEL 5lIOULD Dn CONSULTED UEFORE SIGNING. VACANT LAND CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL EBTATE Seller's remedy Liquidated Damages or Specific Performance (Section 16) ,19 1. PAR'T'IES AND PROPERTY. The Tnwn of Vail , purchaser(s) JT'urchaser], (as joint tenants/tenants in common) agrees to buy, and the undersigned seller(s) (SellerJ, agrees to sell.{ on the terms and conditions set forth in this contract, the following described real estate in the County o[ Edg I e ,Colorado, to wit; See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.. known as No. (Street Address) (City, State, Zip) together with all interest of Seller in vacated streets and alleys adjacent thereto, all easements and other appurtenances thereto, all improvements thereon and all attached fixtures thereon, except as herein excluded, and called the Property. ' 2. INCLUSIONS. 7'he purchase price includes the following items (a) if attached to the Property on the date of this contract: lighting, healing, plumbing, ventilating, and air conditioning fixtures, 7'V antennas, water softeners, smo~c/fire/burglar alarms, security elcvices, inside telephone wiring and connecting blocks/jacks, plants, mirrors, (loot coverings, intercom syslcros, built-in kitchen appliances, and sprinkler systems and controls; (b) if on the Properly whether attached or not on the date of this contract: built-in vacuum syslcros (including accessories), storm windows, storm doors, window and porch shaclcs, awnings, blinds, scrccns, curtain rods, drtpery rods, fircplacc inserts, fircplacc scrccns, fireplace grates, heating stoves, storage sheds, all keys and garage door openers including remote controls; and (c) (ci) vVater Rights. Purchase price to include the following water rights: Al 1 rl ghtS owned by Seller, i f any. (e) Growing Crops. With respect to the growing crops Seller and Purchaser agree as follows: None . - T'he above-described included items (Inclusions) are to be conveyed to Purchaser by Seller by bill of sale, none deed or other applicable legal instrument(s) at the closing, free and clear o[ all taxes, liens and encumbrances, except as provided in section 10. T'he following altaclted fixtures are excluded from this sale: 3. PURCEIASE I'RICEANU'I'ERMS. T'he purchase price shall be $ 3,161 , 9~2. ~Q ,payable in U.S. dollars by Purchaser as follows (complete the applicable terms below): (a) EARNEST' MONEY. $ 10,000.00 in the form of a check as earnest money deposit and part payment of the purchase price, payable to and held by Seller l3f?SRcdf~C `rft)t~`fi114YchE'il xe`f,~aa`Dfa~hlc X,a6wYc~3(IKdfDCb~1Tt ~ltarr~rikl>Q3wcot~ast.RxbTaxl'ciKtlGx xotkdori~ed xpl ~odivgoc~o94 ~~ont;~x»tarJGx tT'c~i~5s)ItK1M xlll~,~~ga~at~fc~roy~c~t~axuaa~~>Elt~x~,g. (b) CASEI AT CLOSING. $ 3 ,151 , 472 . Q~ to be paid by Purchaser at closing in cash, electronic transfer funds, certified check, savings and Ivan teller's check, or cashier's check. S~j~cJlx~xE(dC}4db~~?161ifaCl4fCydEISdLIC)4)CSfxlYdCid>T{Sl~t?~)d~3tt~(~~Xr1Gt~iK)~1CxOtd19C~X ~t~Xr~xSK~9 P4~t4ot~4xdFi~ti~o~t~ ~t,>4 xc~aKx~P~xa~?c xt~~a~ac~xuNxa~ct~~tt~c~hx ~cOtn~m~# x?t ~ts~ x~t xtaXTtg fcasxalkv~xx c OAN. $ b Purchaser obtaining a new loan. 'I'bis loan will be secured by a etc.) deed oft 7'he new loan to Purchaser shall be amortize ~y~~ iod years at approximately $ per including principal anc s not to ex % per annum, plus, if required by I'urchascr's )ender, a deposit of of the estimated annual real estat__e ['saes ro erty insurance premium, and mortgage insuranc retttium if the loan is an adjustable interest rate or graduated payment loan, meats and interest rate ' s all not exceed the figures set forth above. No. C[153 5/89 VACAN"C LAND//FARM ANt) RANCII CONI'l2ACf TO UUl' fi SBLL RG\L fSCA'CG Cage 1 of fi McAllister Publishing, 502 Main St., Carbondale, CO 81623 (303)963.1027 Loan discount points, if any, shall be paid to Icnder at closing and shall not exceed % of the total 1 n amo nt.1'he first (1, 2, etc.) loan discount points shall be paid by ,and the balance, ' any, shall b aid by 1'ur aser shall timely pay a loan origination fee not to exceed % of the loan amount and Purc er's loan costs. Cost any appraisal for loan purposes to be obtained after this date shall be paid by upon loan application as quired by Icnder. (d) ASSUh 'I'IUN. ~ by Purchaser's assuming and agreeing to pay an existing loan in this proximate amount, presently payable at S~ per including principal, interest pres fly at % per annum, and including scrow for the following az indicated: ? real estate t• cs, ? property insurance premium, ? mortgage ins ante premium, ancf Purchaser agrees to pay a an transfer fee not to exceed ~ the time o[ assumption, tltc new interest rate shall not xceed % per annum and the new payment shall not excec $ plus escrow, if any. Scllcr ? shall ? shall not released from liability on said Ivan. If appli blc, compliance with the rcquircrnents for rclcasc from liability shall be evidence by delivery al closing of appropriate Iett r from Icnder. Cost payable for rclcasc of liability shall be paid by in an amount not to exceed ~ (c) SELL1iR OR PR[VA'I'L''I'lI1Rll-I'A 'I'Y FINANCING. S by Purchaser exec 'ng a promissory note p ble lo: on the note form az indicated: (check one box) ? Right-to-Cure NTD 82-11-83 ? No t-to-Cure NTD 81-11-83 - secured by a (lst,2nd,elc.) deed of trus ncumbcring the Prop ty, using the form as indicated: (check one box) ? Strict Uuc-on-Sale (7'D 72 1-83) ? Crcditw thy (TD 73.11-83) ? Assumable -Not due o ale (TD 7411-83) ? 7'hc promissory note sh be amortized on the basis of years, payable t S per including rincipal and interest at the rate o[ % per ann Payments shall commence ancf shat a due on the stay of each succeeding If not sooner paid, the balance of principal an accrued interest shall he clue anti payable after closing. Payments ? s II ? shall not be increased by ~ of estimated annual real estate taxes, and ? shall ? shall not be incre d by of estimated an al property insurance premium. 7'he Io shall also contain the following terms as indicated: I[ any payment is not received within calendar days after its ct a date, a late charge of % of such payment shall be due. lntere~Y. on lender disburs ents under the deed of trust shall be % per annum. Default interest rate shall be ~ % per a um. \ Purchaser may prepay without a penalty except 4. ANCING CONUI'I'IONS AND OBLIGATIONS. Loan Application(s). ]f Purchaser is to pay all or part of the purchase price as set forth in section 3 by obtai g a new loan or i[ a fisting loan is not to be released at closing, Purchaser, i[ required by such lender, shall make writt application within cncfar days from acceptance of this contract. Purchaser shall cooperate with Seller and I er to obtain loan approval, diligently a timely pursue same in good faith, execute all documents ancf furnish all inf anon ancf documents required by the Icnder, an ubject to section 3, timely pay the costs o[ obtaining such loan or Ien consent. (b) Loan Approval. if P aser is to pay all or part of the purchase price by obtainin new loan as specified in section 3, this contract is conditional upon tier's approval o[ the new loan on or bcforo ~ 19 If not so approved by said date, tl?is cont shall terminate. If the loan is so appr d, but such proceeds are not available to Purchaser as required in section 5 (Good run at the time of closing, closin all be extended one time for calendar days (not to exceed (5) five). I[ sufficient funds are t then available, thi ntract shall terminate. (c) existing-Loan Review. If an existing loan is to be r ed at closing, Scllcr shall provide copies of the loan documents (including note, deed o[ trust, mocii[ications) to aser within calendar days from acceptance of this contract. This contract is conditional upon Purchaser's red an roust of the provisions of such loan documents. Purchaser consents to the provisions of such loan documents ' no written o lion is received by Seller or Listing Company from Purchaser within calendar days from chaser's receipt of such uments. If the lender's approval of a transfer of the Property is required, this contract is co dional upon Purchaser's obtainin uch approval without change in the terms of such loan, except as set forth in sect' 3. if lender's approval is not obtained on before , 19 ,this contract shall erminatecl on such date. It Seller is to be released fr liability under such existing loan and Purchaser does not obta' uch compliance as set forth in section 3, this contract may b erminated at Seller's option. (d) Assmnption ante. If Purchaser is to pay all or part of the purchase price by azsumin n existing loan and if the actual principal b nee of the existing loan at the date of closing is less than the amount in se n 3 by more than ~ ,then I'urchascr may terminate this contract effective upon receipt by Seller or 'sting Company of Purch is written notice o[ termination. No. C13S3 5/89 VACANT LANb//FARM AND RANCH CONTRACT TO DUY k SL7LL RhAf. [~I'ATG Page 2 016 McAllicter Publishing, 502 Main 5i., Carbondale, CO 81623 (303)963.1027 (c) Credit fe alion. if Yurchascr is to pay all or part of ltte purchase price by executing a r ry note in favor of Scllct or if an existing loan to be released al closing, this contract is conditional upsu er's approval of Purchaser's financial ability and creditworthiness, w ilz:h-ap ~ruval shall be at Scllcr's sole an ut/e d"iscretion. In such case: (1) Purchaser shall supply to Scllcr on or bcforc ~ at Purchaser's expcnsc, information and documents concerning Purchaser's financial, employmcr ~i' condition; (2) Purchaser consents that Seller may verify Purchaser's financial ability and creditworthi any such informaUO documents received by Seller shall be held by Scllcr in confidence, and not rcl to others except to protect Seller's interest tM transaction; (4) if ScRer does not provide written notice er's disapproval to Purchaser on or before 9 ,then Seller waives this ton. If Seller does provide wrillcn notice of disapproval to Purchaser on or before said date, hi ontract shall ~rt mate. 5. GOOU rUNUS. AN payments required at closing shall be made in funds which comply with all applicable Colorado laws. G. NOT ASSIGNABLE. Phis contract shall not be assignable by Purchaser without Seller's prior written consent. Except as so restricletl, this contract shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties. 7. LVIUL'sNCI~ UI' 7'1'fl,li. Scllcr shall furnish to Iurchascr, at Seller's expcnsc, either a current commitment for owner's liUc insurance policy in an amount equal to the purchase price cent!-6ellerro-e' . , on or before , 19 {f a title insurance commitment is furnished, Purchaser may rcyuire of Seller that copies of instruments (or abstracts of instruments) listed in the schedule of exceptions (Exceptions} in the title insurance commitment also be furnished to Purchaser at Seller's expense. 't'his requirement shall pertain only to instruments shown of record in the office of the clerk and recorder of the designated county or counties. The title insurance commitment, together with any topics or abstracts o[ instruments furnished pursuant to this section 7, constitute the title documents ('T'itle Uocuments). Purchaser must request Scllcr to furnish copies or abstracts of instruments listed in the schedule o(excepfions no later than calendar days after I'nrchaser's receipt o[ the title insurance commitment. 1f Seller furnishes a title insurance commitment, Scllcr will have the title insurance policy delivered to Purchaser as soon as practicable after closing and pay tlrc premium at closing. - See addendum S. TITLE. (a) Title Review. Purchaser shall have the right to inspect the Title Uocuments or abstract. Writlcn notice by Purchaser o! unmerchantability of title or of any other unsatisfactory title condition shown by the'I'iQe Documents or abstract shat{ be signed by or on behalf of Purchaser and given to Scllcr or Listing Company on or bcforc 1 d calendar clays after 1'urchnscr's receipt of 'Title Uocuments or abstract, or within five (5) calendar hays after receipt by Yurchascr of any 7'illc Uocumenl(s) or endorsement(s) adding new Lixceplion(s) to the title commitment together with a copy of the'1'itJe Document adding new L'xceplion(s) to title. If Scllcr or Listing Company dues not receive Purchaser's notice by the dale(s) specilit:d about, Yurchascr shall be dccmed to have accepted the condition of title as disclosed by the Title Uocuments as satisfactory. (b) C\lalters Not Shown by the Public Records. Scllcr shall deliver to Purchaser, on ar before the date set forth in scclion 7, true topics of all lease(s) anti survey(s) in Seller's possession pertaining to the Properly and shall disclose to Yurchascr .di casements, liens of other title maUers not shown by the public rccvrds of which Scllcr has actual knowledge. Purchaser shalt have the right to inspect the Property to determine i[ any third party(s) has any right in the Property not shown by the public records (such as an unrecorded easement, unrecorded lease, or boundary line discrepancy). Writlcn notice o[ any unsatisfactory condition(s) disclosed by Scllcr or revealed by such inspection shall be signed by or on behalf of Purchaser and given to Scllcr ur Listing Company on or bcforc ,19 . If Scllcr or Listing Company does not receive Purchaser's notice by said date, Purchaser shall be dccmed to have accepted title subject to such rights, if any, of third parties of which Purchaser has actual knowledge. (c) Right to Cure. 1f Seller or Listing Company receives notice of unmerchantability of title or any other unsatisfactory title condition(s) as provided in subsection (a) or (b) above, Seller shalt use reasonable effort to correct said unsatisfactory title candilions(s) prior to the date of closing. If Scllcr fails to correct said unsatisfactory title condition(s) on or bcforc the date o[ closing, this contract shall then terminate, subject to scclion 17; provided, however, Yurchascr may, by wrillcn notice reccivect by Scllcr or Listing Company on or bcforc closing, waive objection to said unsatisfactory Lille condition(s). 4. UA'I'1~ OI~ CLOSING. 'T'he date of closing shall be 19 or by mutual agreement at an earlier elate. The hour and place o[ closing shall be as designated by lU. TRANSrER OF T['I'LE. Subject to tender or payment on closing as required herein and compliance by Purchaser with the other terms and provisions hereof, Seller shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient Generd~ WdrrdfltV Deed decd to Purchaser, on closing, conveying the Property fret and clear of al( taxes except the general taxes for the year of closing, ahd eXCCpI fl~fle tree and clear o[ a{1 liens for special improvements installed as o[ the date o[ Purchaser's signature hereon, whether assessed or not; except distribution utility casements, including cable TV; except those matters rcOccted by the Title Uocuments accepted by Yurchascr in accordance with subsection 8(a); except those rights, i[ any, o[ third parties in the Property nut shown by the public records in accordance with subsection 8(b); and subject to building and zoning regulations. 11. PAYhIEN'T Or ENCUMBRANCES. Any encumbrance required to be paid shall be paid at or before the time u( settlement from the proceeds of this transaction or from any other source. 12. CLOSWG COS"1'S, DOCUMENTS AND SERVICES. Purchaser and Seller shall pay their respective closing costs at closing except as otherwise provided herein. Purchaser and Seller shall sign and complete all customary or required documents al or before closing. Fees for real estate closing and settlement services shall not exceed 5 and shall be paid at closing by 13. L'RORATIONS. General taxes for the year of closing, based on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment, rents, water and sewer charges, owner's association dues, and interest on continuing loan(s), if any, and shall be prorated to date o! closing. Any sales, use and transfer tax that may accrue because o[ this transaction shall be paid by Purchaser . No. CDS3 5/89 VACANT LAND//rARM ANt) RANCI t COPTTItACf TO [lUY SELL RCAL ESTATt3 Page ] of 6 McAllister 15ublirhing, 502 Main St., Carbondale, CO 81623 (303)963.1027 I y 14. I'OSS[;SS10N. Possession o(the I'ropcrty shall be delivered to Purchaser as follows: On the date of closing subject to the following lease(s) or tenancy(s): NOne : If Seller, after closing, fails to deliver possession on the daft herein specified, Seller shall be subject to eviction and shalt be additionally liable to Purchaser for payment of $ 100 . DO ,per day from the date of agreed possession until possession is delivered. 15. CUNUI'I'ION OI' ANU UAIVfAGG 1'U I'ROI'ER'1'Y. The Property and Inclusions shat{ be conveyed in their present condition, ordinary wear and tear cxccplccl. )n the even( the Property shall be damaged by fire or other casualty prior to lime of closing, in an amount of not more than ten percent of the total purchase price, Seller shall be obligated to repair the same before the dale of closing. In the event such damage is not repaired within said time or i(lhe damages exeeetl such sum, this contract may be terminated al the option of Purchaser. Should Purchaser elect to carry out this contract despite such damage, Purchaser shall be entitled to credit for all the insurance proceeds resulting from such damage to the Properly and Inclusions, not exceeding, however, the total purchase price. Should any Inclusion(s) or service(s) (ail or be damaged behvecn the date o[ this contract and the elate of closing or the date of possession, whichever shall be earlier, then Seller shall be liable for the repair or replacement of such Inclusion(s) or service(s) with a unit of similar size, age and quality, or an equivalent credit, less any insurance proceeds received by Purchaser covering such repair or replacement. The risk of loss fur any damage to growing crops, by fire or other casualty, shall be borne by the party entitled to the growing crops, if any, as provided in section 2 and such party shall be cntillccl to such insurance proccccls or benefits for the growing crops, i[ any. 1G.'I'IlVtti OC ESSGNCE/REh1EDiGS. 'l'ime is of the essence hereof. If any note or check received as earnest money hereunder or any other payment clue hereunder is not paid, honored or tendered when due,or if any other obligation hereunder is nut performed or waived as herein provictcd, there shall be the following remedies: (a) 1F PURCHASER IS IN DL-'PAUL'I': IF TIIC; BOX IN SUBSECTION (1)1S CHGCKEU, SELLER'S REMEDIES SEIALL BC ASSET FORTH IN SUBSECIION (1) (SPECIFIC PERI'ORhtANCGj. IF SAIU BOX IS NOT C[iECKED, SELLER'S RGItIL'•DIGS SHALL BE AS SGT I'OK'I'll IN SUBSECTION (2) (LIQUIDATGU UAI•tAG1:Sj. ? (1) Specific Performance. Scllcr may elect to treat this contract as cancelled, in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be [orfeitecl and retained on behalf of Seller, and Seller may recover such damages as may be proper, or Seller may elect to treat this contract as being in fu{I force and effect and Scllcr shall have the right to specific performance or damages, or both. (2) Liquielated Damages. All payments and things of value received hereunder shall be forfeited by Purchaser and retained on behalf of Seller and bosh parties shall thereafter be released from all obligations hereunder. ll is agreed that such payments anct things of value are I,IQUIDA'I'EU DAhIAGES and (except as provided in subsection (c)) arc SG,L?.iR'S SOLI; ANU UNLY RLMI'sllY for Purchaser's failure to perform the obligations of this contract. Scllcr expressly waives the remedies of specific performance and additional damages. (b) IF SELLER 1S 1N DEFAULT': Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as cancelled, in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned and Purchaser may recover such damages as may be proper, or Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and 1'urchascr shall have the right to specific performance or damages, or both. (c) CUS'TS ANU EXPENSES. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, in the event o[ any litigation or arbitration arising out of this contract, the court shall award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expense, includingattorncy fees. 17. EAR P'M ' 'DISPUTE. Notwithstanding any termination of this contract, Purchaser gree that, in the event of any controversy regarc m t money and things of value held b ke~rt5i c osing agent, unless mutual written instructions are received by the holder of the carne tn~ of value, broker or closing agent shall not be required to take any action but may aw ' ti.oceeding, or at broker s o cot's option and sole discretion, may inlerplcad all partie, srt any moneys or things o[ value into a court of competent juns t shall recover court asonablc attorney fees. 18. INSPECTION. Purchaser or any designee shall have the right to have inspection(s) o[ the physical condition o[ the Property and lnclusions, at Purchaser's expense. If written notice of any unsatisfactory condition, signed by Purchaser, is not received by Scllcr or Listing Company on or before ,19 ,the physical condition o[ the Property and lnclusions shall be deemed to be satisfactory to Purchaser. If written notice of any unsatisfactory condition, signed by Purchaser, is given to Seller or Listing Company as set forth above in this section, and it Purchaser and Seller have not reached a written agreement in settlement thereof on or before ,19 ,this contract shall then terminals, subject to section 17. Purchaser is responsible and shall pay for any damage which occurs to the Property and Inclusions as a result of such inspection. No. Cti,53 5[89 VACANT LANDJpARM ANb RANCI I CONTRACT't'O BUY do SELL RL1,L PSTATE Page 4 of G McAllister ubliching, 502 Main St., Carbondale, CO 81623 (303)963.1027 ' ~ ~ / 19. A ~NCY DISCLOSURE. 7'he g broker, and its salts agents (Listing Company) represent Seller. T fisting Company owes its of trust, loyalty and confidence to Seller only. While the Listing Comp has a duty to treat I'urchascr hone the Listing Company is the Seller's agent and is acting on alf of Seller and not I'urchascr. BY SICi G LiE1.OW, PURCIIASER ACKNOWLI?DGL.S PRIG 'IMELY NOTICE BY LIS7~ING OR SELLING COM Y 'I'I IAT LISTING COMPANY IS SELL.E AGENT. The selling broker, ,and its sale cnts (Belli Company) represent: [IF THE BOX IN SUBSECTION (b) IS CIIECE:EU, SELLING CO EPRE.SENI'S PURCHASER ONLY, AS SET FOR7'Il IN SUBSECTION (b). IF Tl1E BOX 1 ~CI'ION (b) IS N0T CEIECKED, SELLING COMPANY RCiI'Rt!SLiN1:S SILI,ER ONLY S SC;'I' r0 1N SUBSECTION (a).] (a) Seller. 1'he Selling Company owe tics of trust, loyally and confidcn Seller only. While tt?c Selling Company has a duly to treat Purchaser ho stly, the Selling Company is Seller's agent a is acting on behalf of Scllcr and not I'urchascr. BY SIGNING ~ OVV, PURCIIASER ACKNOWLEDGES PRIOK IELY NOTICE BY SLL.LING COMPANY'1'l1A'I' S ' .INC; COMPANY IS SELLE'R'S AGENT. ? (b) Purcha If the box is checked: The Selling Company owes duties o[ trust, loyalty and wn6 ce to Purchaser only. file the Selling Company has a duty to treat Seller honestly, the Selling Company is acting behalf of ' chaser and not Seller. SELLER ANU L1S'T1NG COMPANY ACE.NOWLEDGE PRIOR 'TIMELY N07 ~ Bl' SELLING COhIPANY'I'IIA'1' 1T IS I'URCIIASGR'S AGENT. 20. ADUI"I'IONAL PRUVISIUNS: ' This contract is supplemented and modified by the addendum attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. . 21. RECOMMENDATION OF LEGAL COUNSEL. By signing this document, Purchaser and Seller acknowledge that the Selling Company or the Listing Company has recommended that Purchaser and Seller obtain the advice o[ their own legal counsel regarding examination of title and this contract. 22. '1'ERivIINA'1'ION. In the event this contract is terminated, all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned and the parties shall be relieved of all obligations hereunder, subject to section 17. - No. CD.43 5 tt9 VACANT LAND//FARM AND RANCI I CON'fRACI' TO DUY do SELL REAL ESTATE Page S of 6 McAllicrer Publishing, 5(12 Main St., Carbondale, CO B1G23 (303)96.102? alai a. i~ ILll~al~dl~itl' I~ r EXN?BIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION I+ • . . I i • That certain parcel of land situate. ~ ~ lying and being in the County of Eagle, ~ State of Colorado, described as follows, ~ ; to wit: ~ ~ . i . i • ,All that portion o.f the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Sec- tion 11, and the Northwest •1/4 ~of thr' South~.•zst l,• 'of Section 12, Township S South, Range 91, lest of the' 6th P. M., lying Narth of the•Nvrthwesterly Right-of-t•lay of Interstate Highway ' No. 70, South of Vail lieiy}~ts, Filing No. 1, Northeasterly of Vail Das Sc}~one Filin3 No. 3, and Sout}rwesterly of Buffer Creek. 'Subdivision, excepting t:rerefrom the following: A parcel of land lying in the F.a~t 1,'2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 11, c?escribeel as: Cvrnmencing at the Northeast Corner of L•he Southwest 1/4 of 'the Southeast 1/9 of said Section 113 thence along the .nest line of said East liZ of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 11, S 1°39'00" W 354.15 feet to the Southerly 1`.ne of Chamonix Lane Rig}it-- of-Way, which is also the Southwest Corner of Vail }leights, Filing No. 1; thence along said So>>therly line on the follow- ing four 'courses: (1) N ,BS°13' 33" E 192.82 feet tv a' point of curve; (2) 270.55 feet along the ~-~rc of a 238.64 foot , ' radius curve to the left khose central angle is 64°57'33" and •~those long chord bears N 52°44'46" E 256.29 feet to a point of tangent; (3)' N 20 °16' 00" E 2>14 . 00 feet; and .(9) 82:24 feet ` 'along the arc of a 227.38 foot radius curve to the right Nhose•central angle is 20°43'23" and whose long chord ' bears N 30°37'92" E 81.79 feet to the true ooint of be- gir~nirrg; then :e continuing along said Southerly line of 4 Chamonix Lane .Right-of-way on the following two courses: ~1) 5~J.35 feet along the: arc of a 327. 3A foo~ radius curve to L}re right wiiosc cent•r.-~l nnr,le i:: 14°27'06" :end whose lonc3 cl~or:l l~cars N' 4II°12' SG" I; 57.20 Lret to a point of tangent; and (2) N 55°26'29" E 198.04 feet; thence S 43°06'35" E 469.14 Lcet to a point on ilie Northerly line,. of Int•~:rstale llig}iway t:o. 70 Riulrt-oC-t•:.~y; thence Svuth- Westerly alc~nq said Norttrer?y line orr the following l:wo .courses: (1) S 44°02'56" W 11.00 feet to a point of r tangent and (2) 25}.43. feet .ilong r.he arc of a 5550.00 L .foot radius curve to the rigr•t whose central angle is 2°37' 36" and whose long chori, bears S 45°21' 44" 1iT 254 irj•1 ~ ~'~r .feet; thence N 42°57'47" 1~ 506.70 feet to the true point C of .bcoinning, ,Y, i L ~.r..rr a.w•.~ r peonmoNt ~m l Legal Description r , << • ti~ • D' ~,iu' ADDENDUM TO VACANT LAND CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE. THIS ADDENDUM supplements that certain vacant land contract to buy and sell real estate between the Town of Vait, Colorado ("Purchaser") and Vail Commons Limited ("Seller"). 1. Deletion of Standard Exceptions. The title insurance policy provided for in the Contract shall expressly provide for the deletions of the standard printed exceptions from the title policy and shall be subject only to those title exceptions listed on Schedule B2 of the title commitment which are acceptable to Purchaser. 2. Delivery of Documents. Seller shall deliver to purchaser all documents listed as exceptions to title in Schedule B of the title policy commitment within fourteen (14) days of the notification of such exceptions by the Purchaser. 3. Delivery of Survev. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser within thirty (30) days of the signing of this Agreement an improvement location survey cert'rfied by a licensed land surveyor defining the boundaries of and locating all easements and rights-of-way on the property. 4. Environmental Survev. (a) The parties acknowledge that Purchaser will perform or cause to be performed an environmental survey and analysis which may, at Purchaser's option, include an analysis of asbestos, PCB in various forms, or other hazardaus substances as Purchaser, in his sole discretion deems necessary. Not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500.00) of the cost of any such survey and analysis shall be shared equally by the Purchaser and Seller. Any cost of such survey in excess of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500.00) shall be paid for solely by the Purchaser. If the results of such survey and analysis reveal levels of hazardous substances or materials which are unacceptable to the Purchaser, Purchaser shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether to close on the transaction contemplated by this Contract. If Purchaser elects not to close, the earnest money deposit made by Purchaser pursuant to this Contract shall be refunded to Purchaser, and thereafter neither party shall have any obligation to the other under this Contract. 5. Entry onto the Property. At any time prior to closing, if this Contract shall not have first been terminated, Purchaser, its agents, contractors, and engineers shall have the right to eater the property for the purpose of making surveys, soil tests, environmental surveys, obtaining topographical information, and for other similar preliminary work, provided that such operations are conducted in such a manner so as not to damage the 1 at, ~ property or affect any operations of the property. Purchaser shall indemn'rfy and hold harmless Seller against all fees, charges, or liens as a result of any activity of Purchaser on the property. 6. Seller's Representations and Warranties. To the best of Seller's actual knowledge, and without performing any investigation or inquiry, Seller represents and warrants as of the date hereof and as of the date of closing that the following are and shall be true and correct: a) The Seller has no knowledge of any patent or latent defects, soil deficiencies, or sub-surface anomalies existing on the property. (b} Neither the execution of the Contract or this Addendum, nor the consummation of the transactions provided for herein constitutes, or results in any breach of the terms, conditions, or provisions of or constitute a default under any mortgage, deed of trust, loan agreement, lien, lease, license, judgement, decree, order, instrument, or other verbal or written agreement to which Seller is a party or is subject to or to which the property is subject. (c) There are no actions, suits, or proceedings pending orthreatened against the Seller or the property or which might adversely affect Seller or the property. (d) SeNer has not received any notice of and has no knowledge of any violation of any law, rule, regulation, or order with respect to the property. (e) Between the date of the Contract and the closing, Seller: i, shall not dispose of any interest in the property and shall not, without Purchaser's consent, mortgage, pledge, or subject to lien or other encumbrance any interest in the property. ii. shall not without the consent of Purchaser, agree to or consent to any restrictions, covenants, conditions, easements, encroachments, or any similar matters, affecting the property or any part thereof. iii. shall not without the consent of Purchaser, enter into any contracts, leases to Seiler or leases by Seller. iv. shall keep the property insured at the current level of insurance maintained thereon. (f) Except as specifically noted in the Contract, there are no special assessments which now burden or encumber the property, and there are not special assessments currently proposed as to the property. (g) No part of the property has ever been used as a landfill, and no materials have ever been stored or deposited upon the property which would under any applicable governmental law or regulation require that the property be treated or materials removed from the property prior to the use of the property for any purpose which would be permitted by law but for the existence of said materials on 2 i~;-J tni!: lJ the property. (h) Each and every document, item, or other information delivered or to be delivered by the Seller to the Purchaser hereunder are made available to the Purchaser for inspection hereunder shall be true, accurate, and correct. (i) There is no fact known to the Seller which materially adversely affects or in the future may (so far as the Seller can now foresee) materially adversely affect the property which has not been set forth in the Contract. 7. Purchaser's Termination. Prior to closing and in the event the Seller fails to fulfill any of its obligations in accordance with this Contract, or should any of Seller's warranties and representations not be true and correct, this Contract shall terminate unless Purchaser by written notice received by the Seller on or before closing waives objection thereto. Upon termination of this Contract the earnest money deposit made by the Purchaser pursuant to this Contract shall be refunded to Purchaser, and thereafter neither party shalt have any obligation to the other under this Contract. 8. Seller's Appraisal. Seller shall have the option to obtain an appraisal to the Property prior to the date of closing. Purchaser shall pay the cost of such appraisal, but in no event shall the cost to be paid by Purchaser exceed the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500.00). It is understood by the parties that the Seller is selling the property to Purchaser for less than fair market value, and that it is the intention of Seller to gift the difference between the purchase price and fair market value to the Purchaser as a charitable contribution from Seller to the Purchaser. Purchaser agrees to cooperate with Seller with respect to Seller's intention to claim a charitable deduction on its federal income tax return. If the appraisal to be obtained by Seller fails to indicate a value for the property of not less than sixteen dollars ($16.00) per square foot, Seller shall have the option to terminate this Contract by giving notice of such termination to the Purchaser prior to closing. Should Seller choose to so terminate this Contract, the earnest money deposit made by Purchase pursuant to this Contract shall be refunded to Purchaser, and thereafter neither party shall have any obligation to the other under this Contract. 9. Purchaser's Representations and Warranties. (a) Purchaser represents and warrants that there is no real estate transfer tax that must be paid in connection with the closing of this transaction. Purchaser agrees to indemnigy and hold Seller harmless with respect to any such real estate transfer tax. (b) That the Town of Vail meets all of the tests of Section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code and qualifies as a fity percent (50%) charitable organization for deduction purposes. 10. Miscellaneous. (a) Any notice under this Contract shall be in writing signed by the party giving the 3 same and shall be deemed properly given and received two (2) days after it is sent by United States mail, postage pre-paid addressed to the party to receive the notice of the address set forth below. SELLER: Vail Commons Limited, a Colorado limited partnership cto Joe Picciuca 200 North Milwaukee Avenue Libertyville, IL 60048 PURCHASER: Town of Vail, 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657 (b) Purchaser and Seller hereby represent a warranty that each has respectively not engaged or utilized the services of any broker or salesman in connection with this transaction. (c) This Contract shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. (d) The Contract and this Addendum thereto represent the entire Agreement between the parties with regard to the subject matter of this Agreement, and all prior Agreements, understandings, and negotiations shall be deemed merged herein. No representations, warranties, promises, or agreements expressed or implied shall exist between the parties except as stated herein. (e) No amendments or modifications to this Contract or this Addendum shall be made or deemed to have been made unless in writing executed and delivered by the party to be bound thereby. (f) The representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement shall survive the closing and delivery of the deed and shall be enforceable at law and equity. In addition, Purchaser may rely on the representations and warranties of the Seller and not be prevented or estopped from pursuing any remedy available to it for breach or violation of any such representation or warranty by reason of any documents or other instruments furnished to Purchaser or any inspection made by or for the benefit of Purchaser. (g) To the extend that any provision of this Addendum and the Contract are inconsistent or in conflict, the terms of this Addendum shall control. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the day and year first written above. TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation By: Rondall V. Phillips, Town Manager VAIL COMMONS LIMITED, a Colorado Limited Partnership By: WEST VAIL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Colorado Corporation as General Partner By: C:~WIRTH.ADD 4 Because of the dominant line management responsibility crf the Town Manager, arrl the need for effective two,way management between the Council and the Town Manager, we will spend campar~tively more time seeking hLS input and helping him assess his management skills than we will with each Council rQember. At the end of this process, we will offer feedback and recommendations to atl participants. Depending on the nature of the issues, the feedback may take the form of a written report, individual meetings, and/or a group meeting, Our aim is to take this feedback and help the Council devise and implemern needed interventions. We are poised to begin this process as soon as we hear from you. We believe that two days itt Vail will be required initially, with either subsequent data gathering or feedback meetings scheduled within three weeks of the initial meetings. We would begin with two hour meetings with each Council Member, followed by a 3 to 4 hour meeting with the Town Manager. 7'he ct~st for the ai~ove services wi11 be ~$5(Jil.UU plus oat of pocket expenses. This includes initial interviews, written re~,,.ls, and feedback to all participants. At the conclusion of this process, we will be strongly positinned to help implement +changes deemed desirable by the Counc~'t andlor Town Manager, We look forward to the prospect of working with you Yours Sin t Guy W. t;orneli ,Ph.D. $tep en L. Hloaxn, Ph.D. cswr;/st.u:aa 08~9L 80-LO-E66t EOd 500 'aNI ' '00 ~ 311IA2l3WOS 6E56 £Z9 £0£ SOMERVIL.~E & COMPANY, ING, MANAGE:Mt;NT 11NIJ ORGgNIZA710NAL PSYCHOLOGY t6~5 SROADWJtY DENVtR.COLDRAbO 842bZ T(cePHON( 303,6Z3•o5o0 F'wx 9O3.BZZ•3633 January t3, 199 Mail 't'own Council c/o Mayor Peggy C?sterfoss 7S South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Deer Council Members; We appreciated the opportunity to discuss the management issues faang the Town of Vail, as well as your hopes for the results from a consulting relationship with Somerville ~ Company (SCI). We believe we are strong%y positioned to meet your needs. This letter contains our ~.,~,t,osal far how we might best proceed. We understand your needs to be as follows: 1. To gain a cogent and comprehensive understanding of the current level of functiarling of the Town Council, Mayor, and Town Manager, 2. To gain understanding of the psychological and interpersonal factors contributing to and detracting from overall effectiveness. 3. To combine insights gained through our invalvemertt with insights previously provided by Mountain States Employers Council and Browne, Bortz and Cotldington, Inc., and to shape these into clear paths of action to be taken by ' the Council, Mayor, and Town Manager. 4. To help you evaluate and implement cht~e options, and to drive needed changes in the event that outside assistance is required. Basically, our task is to help you understand the conditions under which the Council, Mayor .and 'Town Manager can be maximally effective, and then to help you create chose conditions. Our ultimate interventions may take numerous forms, but any intervention must be rooted in a solid understanding of the Town's mission, structures and systems, and the personal dynamiGS and expectations of the koy people. We wdl need to meet individually with each of the seven Council Members and the . Town Manager. These meetings will be aimed at soliciting each person's perspective on the issues effecting the functioning of tha Council, Mayor and lvlanager. ~Od 900 '~NI ° °0~ 3~~IA~3WQS ££S£ £Z9 £0£ tr£=9I 80-LO-£66t 9~_ s~G - aa~ RECEIVED N OV 13 1992 Tom. ?r TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. 5757 Wilshire Blvd. • Suite 344 Los Angeles, CA 90036 (213) 931-2600 Fax (213) 931-7355 November 9, 1992 ~J .~t/" Mr. Lawrence A. Eskwith Town Attorney Town of Vail 75 Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Larry: In accordance with our discussion, enclosed is a scope of work to provide cable television consultant assistance to the Town of Vail .during the Town's franchise renewal with Heritage Cablevision. I have taken. the liberty of proposing several work tasks, including drafting of franchise documents and negotiation assistance, in addition to the technical review of the Heritage cable system. The Town may consider these to be optional tasks which can be authorized if the services are desired. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our services to the Town of Vail. We look forward to your response. Sincerely, C ~ CARL PILNICK President enclosure VAILHER.PRO " ~ R~G~lVE~ f 3 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CABLE TELEVISION CONSIILTING SERVICES TO THE TOWN OF VAIL A. GENERAL Telecommunications Management Corp. (the Consultant) shall provide cable television consultant services to the Town of Vail (Town) in support of the Town's refranchising process., and in accordance with the following tasks. B. TASRS Task 1 Preparation of Cable Television Regulatory Ordinance Amendments The Consultant shall review the Town's current cable- related television ordinance, Title 21, Chapter 21.02, and submit for the Town's consideration recommended modifications which will update the Chapter's regulatory authority and establish consumer service standards. The amendments shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: Compatibility with the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and other applicable laws and regulations. Compatibility with the current status of cable television technology and services. Provision of regulatory flexibility, consumer service standards and franchise enforcement capability to the extent appropriate to protect the public interest. Subsequent to submission of the amendments, the Consultant, upon request, shall participate in relevant briefings, meetings and public hearings. Up to three (3) meetings are included in the cost quoted in E. below for this task. i 2 Task 2 Evaluation of Cable System and Recommendations of Renewal Objectives The Consultant shall perform an evaluation of the Heritage Cablevision (Heritage) cable system serving the Town. The evaluation shall include, but not necessary be limited to: A review of the system design and operational capability, the age and conditions of major components and facilities, and its ability to be upgraded. A review of the system's proof-of- performance tests and results, and a comparison with FCC technical standards. A review of the system records with respect to service calls, response to subscriber complaints, and maintenance history. A comparison of system capability with current and anticipated state-of-the- art, including the impact of new and emerging technologies upon franchise renewal objectives. A review of the community and government access channel facilities including current equipment and programming and the capability of the channel to be upgraded and expanded to meet future community needs and interests. The end-item of Task 2 shall be a written evaluation report, including all data, analyses and conclusions. The report also shall contain recommended minimum requirements and target objectives for franchise renewal, in such areas as: Regulatory terms and conditions. System upgrade, capacity and capability, including consideration of advanced features, such as "user-friendliness" and institutional communications. Consumer protection standards and quality of service. Community and government access. VAIIHER.PRO ¦ 3 Practical provisions for enforcement of franchise commitments. Task 3 Support in Franchise Renewal Negotiations The Consultant shall provide support in franchise renewal negotiations, including as a minimum, the following: Providing appropriate recommendations for negotiation objectives and strategies. Reviewing and evaluating any proposals submitted by the franchisee. If requested, the Consultant shall draft a franchise renewal agreement, containing the elements for renewal considered in the Town's best interests. Participation in negotiation meetings, as requested, and acting as the Town's chief negotiator. Meeting with, and briefing of, Town _ staff and elected officials, and attendance at public hearings and meetings, as required. Up to five (5) meetings are included in the cost quoted in E. below for this Task. C. PER30NNEL Mr. Carl Pilnick, President of Telecommunications Management Corp., shall be the Principal Consultant for all tasks, with support from Mr. Michael J. Friedman, TMC Vice President, as required. D. BCHEDIILE The following schedule is proposed: Task 1 Ordinance amendments submitted within 30 days after authorization to proceed. Task 2 Report submitted within 60 days after authorization to proceed. VAILHER.PRO 4 Task 3 At the Town's convenience. E. COSTS The total fee for all Tasks shall be $19,000, on a firm, fixed-price basis. The Tasks shall be invoiced as follows. Task 1 $2,400 (invoiced upon submission of the amendments) Task 2 $7,800. ($3,000 invoiced 30 days after authorization to proceed with the remainder invoiced upon submission of the evaluation report and draft franchise agreement) Task 3 $8,800 (75% invoiced 30 days after the initiation of negotiations, with the remainder invoiced upon task completion) Also included in these costs are five (5) bound copies plus one (1) reproducible copy of the report and draft franchise agreement. Additional copies will be provided at TMC's cost. Travel costs for Town-approved visits shall be invoiced at TMC's cost. VAILHER.PRO 0lii1i1993 14 01 RRP&J 303 623 9222 P. 02 Y,. ,r ItUTQ~?L 8~8L8J16E ilbtb S~ iKi~H'i' 1. The parties to this Mutual ~te~.ease And settlement Agree~rent (the "Agreement") are PCL Construotion Bervfces, Tna., a Colorado corporation { ~ PCL") , and its Surety, Fidel ity i Deporsl~t Company of Maryland, a Maxpiand corporation ("F&D"), the Town of Vafi, Colotado t"Vail"), and Huim Construat~.o»',Co., d colarada oorparation {"Hula"). The terms of this Agreement have been agreed upon by and between the parties on Deaw„wer 22, 1992, and this Agreement will be executed by the parties sooxt thereafter but not later than January 15, 1992. 2. riCL ®ntered into a general Contract with tb4 Town of Vail tar construction at thQ vai.i Transportation Csnter tthe *Projeot") . F&D provided a bond regarding tb.e full satisfaction of obligations _ Awed to suppliers and subcontractors, as required by the generax contrast. Kith PCL ag the named princ~ipa~,. Hu1m entered into, a subcontract with PCl,far a portion of the project Work, to include: supply and install waterpraafing, joint sealers and expansion joints, As speCiffcally outlined in Exhibit "A" to the contract of June 15, 1990 (Contract No. Dp224A). 3. Halm f~.led an action against FCL, F&D and Vail in the Distriot Caurt of Eag~.e County for the State of Colorado, CiVi~. Action No. p2 CV 12 (the "Lawsuit") , to rescuer moneys far stark performed and materials supplied for the rirojeet. 4. The parties to this Agreement mutually desire settlement GP all claims which were asserted ar could have been aBSerted flt the Lawsuit. _ 5. In full and complete consideration for settlement~af trie GlafAt6 Of $lllln, afire@~ to pay Thirty-Two ThOUSand pi.vs dr8d ~a xQ/100 bollars t$~~,~aa.00) to Hulm. This payment, to be ~d?ade in certified funds, w~.ll became due and owing one week after this Agreement is executed. This payment shall be in full aCCOrd and satisfaction of any and a1.]. disputed claims of Hulm against pCL, F&n and veil. 6. Vail agrees to release to PcL moneys f.t is holding in escrow no later than one weals after tho oxacution of this AgraeZa4ztt. 7. In consideration of their payment sad p.....~ise6 described in ~ S above, and the mutual promises Contained in this Agreement, Halm and ~,ts successors, subrogees and assigns hereby release and forever discharge PCL, F&D and Vail, their insurers, successors, offic~~~., directors., employees, agents, r~prec~entatives, dir:ct and indirect parents and affiliates, subrogees and assigns from any a~ all Wanner of cla~.ms, demands, actions, setoffs, causes of action or suits whatsoever related to the Prajeest. 01f11i1993 14 02 RAP&J 303 623 9222 P.04 ~ of j ~ ss. CCnNTY OF ) T'he foregoing instrument was aaknnawledc~ed before me this day of , 1993, by Frederick J. Magner as Vine President of Holm Construction eo. Witrtoaa my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: ~Nataxy ~tb1iC pCi. CO~tBTEITCTIOI~ 6gRVICEB~ i STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 193, by as of PCT. Construction Sax~vicas, Inc. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: , Notary Public 3 - 0lii1i1993 1403 RAP&J 303623 `3222 P.05 a ~ - _ tID$L=?Y ~ p8POd1"~' ~cr~r as - - - ~s~r.~ - 1' - - BX • NTATE QF-~- - } - ) ss. OdrTNTY O~ = } 2'he-~Eoregofng instrument uraag t~axnawledged before me this day of , 1993, by ~ as _ _ of Fidelity & l~apoaft Costpany of Witness; my-hand and ofPiaial seal. My Gvmmission Expires: Notary Publia _ '1'$8 '1'OWb~ O? VAZLi lALORADO _ By: STATE OF } } SS. coUr17*Y of } The foregoing instrument was aclcnowiedged before me this day of , 1993, by es of The Town of Vail, Colorado. Witness my hand and aff~.c~.al seal. My Commission Expires: Notary Public 58271 1/11193 ~ ~ A•llutREl.1~ i s t r DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE GREG HALL MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCROLL CAROLINE FISHER JIM HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX DD DETO LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER KEN HUGHEY JODY DOSTER MANUEL MEDINA FILE JANEIL TURNBULL MEMORANDUM T0: RON PHILLIPS, TOWN MANAGER FROM: LARRY GRAFEL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: JANUARY 11, 1993 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF JANUARY 11, 1993 - JANUARY 15, 1993 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Construct various signs: a. Village loading signs for core. b. 4-Way to Gold Peak, handicap skier service signs. c. 2 "Caution-Falling Debris/Use at Own Risk" for underpass at Aspen Lane and install at both ends. d. Miscellaneous signs as determined by Engineer. e. "Parking in designated spaces...etc." 2. Install "No Skier Parking" sign at Muni. Bldg. 3. Paint sculpture in south west corner of LHTRC. 4. Cut snow pack in various locations: a. Gateway b. Intown Ramps c. Bus Routes 5. Monitor trailer for Xmas tree recycling and dump as necessary. 6. Mulch Xmas trees. 7. Run sweeper (weather permitting). 8. Conduct CDL testing (Charlie 0. to test Gilbert G.). 9. Safety meeting Wednesday, 1/13 at 11:30 am in Town Shop's Lunchroom followed by quarterly meeting with Ron Phillips at 12:30 pm. 10. Bid on "Ski Museum Park" project. 11. Clean off new bus shelter roofs. 12. Water trees on north side of South Frontage Rd. in front of VTC. 13. Install sno-box on #307 to help haul snow from Village/Lionshead. r t PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1. Coordinate heat trace for storm drain with Leo. 2. Install door for Bus Department. 3. Resolve sweep/dirt problem. 4. Meeting Tuesday, 1/12 at 10:30 am in small council chambers at Muni. Bldg. regarding the "Brotherhood" visit. 5. Install lock between We-Recycle and Community Development. 6. Shovel roofs at Muni and Terminal Bldgs. 7. Deliver bus maps to lodges throughout town. CARPENTERS A. 1. Construct furniture for Public Work's office. 2. Construct storage cabinet for Public Work's copy machine. 3. Construct sink cabinet for Public Work's break room. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Run conduit for fire detector for storage facility at VTRC. 2. Install smoke detector and lights at Ski Museum Storage. 3. Repair leaning street light pole at Municipal Bldg. 4. Repair various light outages. 5. Install disconnect at cinder bin. 6. Bid electrical part of "Ski Museum Park" project. 7. Assist with electrical for new fire truck. 8. Repair monitor in bus supervisor's office. 9. Check meter numbers for park and recreation path accounts for finance. 10. Coordinate light order for Stephens Park with Todd 0. 11. Fire code violations & install various electric items in Community Development. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Draw up plans for Fleet Maintenance Restrooms. 2. Complete planting plan for Dowd Junction Recreation Path. 3. Prepare Ski Museum contract documents for rebid. 4. Prepare "in-house" bid for Ski Museum Park. 5. Finalize alternative plans for Gore Creek Pedestrian Bridge. 6. Coordinate light order for Stephens Park with Leo. LG/jlt i AGENDA PRESENT LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY Bishop SPECIAL MEETING Fried JANUARY 4, 1993 Thomas 10:00 A.M. White Wilson 1. PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of the Authority of a Special Events Permit, Malt/Vinous/Spirituous Beverages, for the Shaka Franklin Foundation For Youth, a Colorado non-profit corporation, for the following dates and times: DATE FROM TO January 17, 1993 7:00 P.M. 1:30 A.M. January 18, 1993 7:00 P.M. 1:30 A.M. January 19, 1993 7:00 P.M. 1:30 A.M. January 20, 1993 7:00 P.M. 1:30 A.M. January 21, 1993 7:00 P.M. 1:30 A.M. This event is to be held at the Cascade Club, 1295 Westhaven Drive, Vail, Colorado. Officers for this event are as follows: President - Al Dodson Event Manager - Michael L. Haynes Michael Haynes present. Approved 5-0, with conditions: a. Event to be confined to the premises of the 4 tennis courts only. b. Tickets sales will be permitted to individuals under 21 years of age. 2. Any other matters the authority wishes to discuss. a. Next scheduled meeting Wednesday, January 13, 1992. b. Letter to be sent to Cuitre regarding better advertising of two separate locations for food and liquor. Meeting was adjourned at 10:50 A.M. TOWN OF VAIL LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY Pamela A. Brandmeyer Acting Secretary to the Authority ' Vall Dafty Wednesday,`January.~,':1993.--~ Page3., , _ _ w , fox. ~ ( _..~a. P, . ou~.Q . , ~ r , , ~Consu Itant be ' ns u dat' n g p g Ea le C®u nt mister Ian g y p ' Co U my h l reS final draft, depending on com- munitydiscussion. consultant to "People felt that when "The reason we do a report they submit a-land use before we even go rA the public is update ~ pYOCeSS application they ,have -I've got to have information io give. nO idea what Eagle them," he said. "Then the public By David Sokolik can respond to real issues,. not just oa~y s~arr writer COUnty Wants. People talk about what's happening in their who work in this tom- b~~~d" EAGLE - By next year, .Eagle munity really feel that After scoping is completed, County hopes to have a specific and lack of vision." Richman will write a report on the clear master plan that better suits existing conditions. In addition to the needs of a growing county, the raw data collection, 1,500 to 2,000 consultant hired by the county said. -Consultant Alan Richman on surveys will be mailed out to Alan Richman was contracted by the Eagle County master plan locals. " Eagle County for $1.11,000 to Richman said ,the questionnaire revamp its land use process. On will give respondents specific Monday he briefed members of Eagle County wants. People who, choices and issues like where both the "present and incoming" work in this community really feel 'growth "is -wanted, .where open county commissioners on the that lack of vision." ~ space should be preserved and how process. Commissioner Don Welch said much new commercial space Though in the early stages of his that new approach' was a "terrific" should be zoned. ' formula, Richman already found in idea. Then in.June, the public will be preliminary interviews [hat there is The process by which Richman's consulted again, this time to create a widespread desire for a more firm achieves that .goal relies a map of what residents want the defined master plan. The last heavily on input from residents. county to look like in the future. ...review was in 1980. Next week, with the help of the Originally,. he said his main goal Eagle Valley Community Forum, "Basically' we .see those vision- was going to be amending the land two meetings will be held at dif- ing meetings as giving us the. raw use regulations, .but .that has now ferent ends of the valley to collect material for us to form a plan," changed. general ideas and concerns about Richman said. "One _ thing ,important to land use. (See related story on page everybody is that the master plan 6). - When the new land use plan is needed the greatest emphasis," At- those gatherings Richman .finally passed, :Commissioner 'Bud Richman said: ."People.. felt. that will bring a rough draft of the mas- Gates said applicants' and the when 'they submit a .land use ap- ter plan: He stressed though that it board's jobs will ,both be made plication they have, no idea what may have little resemblance to the easier. i , P~g~'~~~-`Vt~1F'Uc11'j~Wefdn~egEl~y; ~~~ilil~ryt~999'~ .Local ~ _ g ro u p ~o~t ~ n:g meetin: s for :in : ~ut~~on g p . . . master ..lan u dat~e~ p p By Dayld S,,okollk .,product.. , ~ ; , , o~ry`statt;writer I;angenwalter said the ;idea' for the' meetings 'was given to EVCF ~'::`Eagle'.County,; locals,..will get a by Jack Lewis and Keith MQntag~at chance to make their views on land `Che.;;county. Input received will be . use :known~'at.,two meetings, next considered by them as the master ivicek. ~ plan and land use regulations will FTo assist the' county. in~ getting be revamped. commtnity,seritiment on the master - . "Our hope is to receive, inform'a- plan revision~'in process; the.>Eagle ion which helps identify'mairi is- Valley Community Forum (EVCF) ;sues of public concern," Montag is ,'.hosting '.two "Speak Out said. "We don't,expect>people`at- Meetings' :,Mending= ;ao be; "well-,versed '.about On Jan. 13. at he Eagle County currene °regulations;""we just need Exhibit Hall Building or on, Jan, .14 their" honest "opinions about a at thc:~Christie"Lodge., m,Avon, variety of topics which affect their, anyone interested; can .voice any home and environment." _ concerns they 'may have about,ahe EVCF was .formed in 1991; as a :county master plan ors the county ~ non.profit. organization devoted W land use'regulations. Both meetings ;preserving .and enhancing a :certain :are from' 7 p m: to 9 p.m. ~ ;quality of life. , „Hopefully ,the casual nature" of ~ , 'the gatherings will elicit responses ; Langenwalter said-...that several more easily than~~n a formal meet-' -residents .approached ~her.•~commit- ing .at`-;the Eagle :County, ,Building, ;tee:, last August to discuss the best said Kathy Lan~enwalter, ~h =°methods- , .of ',.measuring public oi: the r. v ~,$labcommit ion opinion„on the master plan revision ~~n;;,~;and devg~nmgnt „ ` ro ect. _ . ~ ~~"~'.CP ` ho1t1D,Y...~SS' " ~4,~sau1 - "For., us " to identify .we public ".One thing ma®~ of nc have fet,~IS opinion, we need participation.-from r~glg°aret more-'inclined ~ 'SSIk .'`residents`across the board-short- ,aboutxhowtTey `-think aboyl;.land term and long-term locals,. up-val- - use in an informal se~g," ley and. dowq-valley homeowners Atari. ;Richman, the ''consultant ~-and. renters, and. from every cultural 'who ~s workm on the coun 's ~ g ty .,and economic sloi," she said.- #land use plan; said.,public input is ;j For ,more information, call Judy 'essential to .:an. ~''acceptable~~-*~end `.'Althaus at:926=2024, , a ~ . a . . ~ X C . ~~~C,c,f., N O T I C E O F M E E T I N G ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE TOUR Colorado Association of Ski Towns January 22 to 24, 1993 The Legislative Tour will be held January 22nd to 24th at the Christie Lodge in Avon. Rennetta Lueckenhoff with Colorado Ski Country USA has already mailed you an agenda for the three day event. The CAST business meeting is scheduled on Friday, January 22nd at 3:00 p.m. Please meet in the Christie Lodge's VIP Conference Room which is immediately adjacent to the front desk. It would be helpful if you would contact any State Legislators that you know providing them with a personal invitation. See you in Avon! DFCS/emw :castnote.leg COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF SKI TOiv'NS VAIL, COLORADO DECEMBER 11, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT ACHEN, Mark - Grand Junction BLACK, Elizabeth - Frisco BLACK, Paula Cooper - Steamboat Springs BROWN, Clay - Fraser COLLINS, Mark - Grand Lake CRANK, Bill - Crested Butte EFTING, Bill - Aspen EGGER, Virginia - Telluride FILSON, Bob - Gunnison JAN!_E S , B i 11 - Avo n LAPIN, Merv - Vail LeVINE, Rob - Vail LONG, Tom - Silverthorre riARGERUM, Amy - Aspen MARTINEZ, Gary - Breckenridge NOTTINGHAM, C.C. - Avon OSTERFOSS, Peggy - Vail PHILLIPS, Ron - Vail RAITANO, Florine - Dillon RASTELLO, Blaise - Steamboat Springs ROGALSKI, Vincent - Mt. Crested Butte REYNOLDS, Buz - Avon RUSSELL, Salli - Telluride SCHMIDT, Jim - Crested Butte SHEARER, Jim - Vail SHEPHERD, Conner - Grand Junction SHRUM, Daryl - Winter Park STEINBERG, Thomas - Vail SUITER, Gary - Snovrmass Village TEVERBAUGH, PJick - Winter Park VARLEY, David - Silverthorne WEST, Steve - Breckenridge OTHERS PRESENT ANDERSOid, Jim - Peak Productions DEVERELL, Jerry - Crested Butte KUNZE, Carr - Glenwood Housing Consultant LUECKENHOFF, Renatta - CSC:USA MAMET, Sam - CML MATTOX, Vicki - George K. Baum OHLSON, Joyce - Gunnison SMITH, T. MICHAEL - Department of Local Affairs CAST - Vail DECEMBER 11th, 1992 PAGE 2 1. CALL TO ORDER President Nick Teverbaugh called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. 2. CONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 9th, 1992 MINUTES A motion was made by Rob Levine and seconded by Flo Raitano to approve the October 9th, 1992 minutes. The membership unanimously approved the minutes as presented. 3. HOST WELCOME Peggy Osterfoss, the Mayor of Vail, welcomed the CAST membership to the community. 4. REPORTS A. Fiscal Report A fiscal report was included in the CAST packet. Daryl Shrum gave an overview of CAST's financial position and no questions were asked by the membership. B. 1993 Legislative Tour Nick Teverbaugh explained that he had toured the Christy Lodge in Avon with Renretta Lueckenhoff on December 10th. Nick indicated that the Christy Lodge has excellent accommodations in order to host the Legislative Tour in Avon on January 22nd, 23rd and 24th. Nick went on to explain that the tour format has been changed as follows: 1. The video presentations by Ski Country and CAST will occur on Friday evening; following a banquet. 2. On Saturday morning, Ski Country, CAST and the legislators will be broken into three or four working session groups with specific topics being discussed by each of the respective groups. Ski Country has elected to discuss the Tourism Board and interim funding for the Tourism Board during 1993 as a result of Amendment 1. In addition, Ski Country will discuss the impact of skiing on the State's economy. CAST has not decided the exact topics for the other groups, but the legislative committee will be finalizing the topics within the next two to three weeks. Written background information will be available on each topic selected. Each group will have a group leader who will be a member of CAST or Ski Country to lead the discussion. It is anticipated that the group meetings will be scheduled from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 3. Saturday afternoon is set aside for skiing or other leisure activities while on Saturday evening the legislators will go to various restaurants in the Avon/Beaver Creek area. On Sunday morning, it is anticipated that three or four legislators will speak to the group on pending State legislative issues. Ski Country's video that will be presented at the Legislative Tour was shown to the membership. The Ski Country video lasted approximately 8 minutes and it mainly contained interviews with key personnel from the various ski areas in Colorado talking about accomplishments and objectives. It was recommended by the membership to ask Tom Norton, President of the Senate and Chuck Berry, Speaker of the House,to attend the Tour and be a part of the presentations on Sunday morning. Rennetta Lueckenhoff with Ski Country indicated she would contact the legislative leadership in near future to personally ask them to participate in the Sunday morning session. CAST - Vail DECEMBER 11th, 1992 PAGE 3 Nick Teverbaugh indicated that Ken Kirkland from the Governor's office may want to meet with the CAST membership to discuss school finance issues at one of the upcoming CAST meetings. C. Colorado Convention Center Report Ron Phillips indicated that he had attended a meeting concerning the Colorado Convention Center and the possibility of CAST advertising in the Convention Center. Ron stated that nothing concrete has happened to date and he would report back at the next meeting. D. Bicycle Colorado David Varley stated that the magazine is currently being prepared and all script should be finalized in January or February of next year. David also indicated that additional sponsors are being sought to be involved with the magazine. E. Tourism Conference - Park Citv The membership decided that CAST members should attend the ICMA Resort Conference scheduled in Park City, Utah, on June 3rd - 5th, 1993. The membership decided that it is not appropriate for CAST to be a co-sponsor of the ICMA meeting. Several CAST members stated that they may be able to attend the ICMA meeting in Park City and would be willing to sit on a panel or panels concerning a variety of topics impacting resort communities. Those people indicating an interest are as follows: Paula Cooper-Blaclt, Steamboat Springs; Jim Schmidt, Crested Butte; Tom Long, Silverthorne; David Varley, Silverthorne; Bi11 Crank, Crested Butte; Tom Steinberg, Vail; Amy Margerum, Aspen; Ron Phillips, Vail; Virginia Egger, Telluride; Mark Achen in Grand Junction; Gary Martinez, Breckenridge; Steve West, Breckenridge; Merv Lapin, Vail; and Daryl Shrum, Winter Park. Flo Raitano indicated that ICMA was interested in holding a conference in the state of Colorado concerning recycling in resort communities. Additional information on the subject will be provided by Flo at the next CAST business meeting in Avon on January 22nd, 1993. 5. 1992 BALLOT ISSLIRR end 1993 STATE LEGISLATIVE REPORT Sam Mamet the Associate Director of the Colorado Municipal League, made the following comments: It appears that a Privatization Bill or several privatization bills may be introduced during the 1993 Legislative Session. One aspect of privatization concerns limiting the purpose of Park and Recreation Districts in crder that they are not directly competing with private health clubs. Sam also indicated that the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry as well as the National Federation of Business may be introducerg privatization legislation. The emphasis here was on establishing a hearing process to define which services could logically be provided by the private sector. Sam indicated that Tim Foster may also present a privatization bill during the 1993 Legislative Session. Sam stressed that privatization should be addressed by a CML task force where the public and private sectors can discuss the issues thoroughly. The task force format worked well for CML when Home Rule cities throughout the State streamlined sales tax regulations and procedures last year. Sam emphasized that privatization was a good topic for the Legislative Tour agenda. Sam's next topic concerned the State's 1993 Budget which is explained in the C2~.L newsletter dated December 4th, 1992. Sam also indicated that the Supreme Court did not accept Governor Romer's interrogatories concerning clarification of five points in Amendment 1. Unfortunately, it appears that a number of lawsuits will need to be initiated in order that key questions concerning Amendment 1 can be answered within the next several years. Sam CAST - Vail DECEMBER 11th, 1992 PAGE 4 indicated that the State Legislature will probably be involved in Amendment 1 topics including: A. Changing the property tax calendar B. Change to annual appraisals C. Local growth definition Sam stated that Town staffs should assist the Town Clerks due to all the election requirements contained in Amendment 1. Sam also thanked Ski Country for all their help in attempting to defeat Amendment 1. Sam emphasized that each town should communicate with the League on all the problems that have been created by Amendment 1 in order that a complete catalog can be retained and utilized at a later date. T. Michael Smith, Colorado Department of Local Affairs was introduced to the membership. Mr. Smith made a short presentation about School Finance and the impact of Amendment 6 being defeated. Michael indicated that the Governor has currently scheduled meetings t::^.roughout the State to talk about school finance and to solicit input from various local community leaders. Mr. Smith emphasized that local governments in the state may need to work together to restructure how schools are financed and operated. The Governor is thinking of attempting to have the 1988 School Finance Act modified i n order that local communities can solve their own school funding problems. The State is looking ir_to ways to eliminate state mandates concerning such topics as ADA, Specia'_ Education and other areas in order to eliminate bureaucratic red tape. P_ very extensive discussion occurred among the membership concerning school finance and the fact that changes in the Governor's former approach needs to be undertaken in order that the schools in the State of Colorado can continue to provide quality education. 6. AFFORDABLE N_OUSING RELATED TO U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES' BILL NO. 4971 Carr Kunze, a Housing Consultant from Glenwood, made a short presentation concerning U.S. House of Representative Bi11 No. 4971. All interested communities received a copy of the Bill. An extensive discussion transpired with most of the conversation pertaining to the fact that eligible incomes at 60~ below the median income levels may not work in the resort communities. The same problem has been encountered with HUD and CHAFA sponsored housing in resort communities. The membership was not in favor of providing affordable housing for only ski area employees with the location being tied to U.S. Forest Service Special Use Permits issued to the various ski areas. The membership felt like local governments should be included as a participant and that the location of the housing should be on Federal property throughout a community and not tied to special use permits. HR 4971 died in committee last year mainly since the U.S. Agriculture Department wasn't supportive of including affordable housing as a part of the special use permit process. The membership agreed that local governments should be involved with this issue and not merely ski areas. Apparently, HB 4971 was supported by the P.merican Ski Federation in which Colorado Ski Country is a member. The Legislative Committee has agreed to work on this issue and will be in contact with Senator Ben Campbell's office to obtain more information. 7. COMP3ITTEE REPORTS A. Ground Transportation - Stapleton Elizabeth Black gave a report on the Ground Transportation situation at the new Denver International Airport. She indicated that some changes have occurred and that ground transportation should work well at the new airport. She will keep the membership updated. B. Colorado Tourism Board Ron Phillips indicated that the funding for the Tourism Board will expire June 30th which is the same time that the .2~ Tourism Tax will expire. He indicated that the Tourism Board staff has been working hard to make existing financial resources last CAST - Vail DECEMBER 11th, 1992 PAGE 5 until a November 1993 election. Ron indicated that it is imperative that this issue be placed on the 1993 ballot but he's not sure if the referendum or petition approach will be utilized. Ron indicated that due to Amendment 1, the election will be very costly. In fact, the election may cost up to $500,000 to insure the passage of the continuation of the tourism tax and the operation of the Tourism Board. 8. LUNCH MEETING Nick Teverbaugh had the various elected officials in attendance sign up to be video taped for the 1993 Legislative Tour presentation. During lunch various elected officials attended the video taping which was undertaken by Peak Productions of Winter Park. A. Park Director's ReAOrt Several Park Directors met in the morning concerning the construction and operation of ice skating rinks. They indicated that their meeting was successful but a verbal report was not warranted to 'the membership. B. After lurch a 1ergtI~y discussion occurred concerning the impacts and philosophy surrounding the passage of ?amendment 2. Virginia Egger of Telluride made a motion that Daryl Shrum and Nick Teverbaugh should develop a CAST Resolution concerning civil rights, anti-discrimination and home rule powers. It was agreed by the membership that Amendment 2 itself would not be mentioned in the Resolution. Flo Raitano seconded Virginia Egger's moticn which was unanimcusly passed by the membership. A copy of the Resolution tiaill be forwarded to all members for their review. It was agreed by the me.*nbership to attempt to hold a meeting in Denver with State legislators on April lst, 1993 to discuss legislative issues. The objective is to get additional participation from the legislators due to some members not being able to attend the annual legislative tours. The meeting *.•;ith the legislators is planned for the afternoon on April lst (Thursday) and the regular n;eetit~g will occur on April 2nd (Friday) during the morning. It was decided that Mayor Webb s::ould be invited to attend the Friday morning meeting. The membership decided that the Friday afternoon business meeting on January 22nd concerning the Legislative Tour will commence between 2:00 and 3:00 p.m. The CAST packet will clearly indicate the exact time and place of this meeting. With no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 2:15 p.m.. The next meeting is scheduled in Avon on January 22nd. ?respectfully submitted, Daryl K. Shrum Secretary/Treasurer DKS/emw :castmins.129 COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF SKI TOWNS Treasurer's Report January 5, 1992 Beginning Cash Balance $29,653.76 11-24-92 REVENUE Deposits $ 1,371.63 EXPENDITURES 8,141.70) Ending Cash Balance $22,883.69 Detailed Report REVENUE Interest $ 92.46 Dues 159.00 Bike Guide -0- Meeting reimbursements 1.120.17 TOTAL REVENUE RECEIVED $ 1,371.63 EXPENDITURES McConnell Printing Co. - CAST stationary $ 82.00 Peak Productions - Legislative Tour Video (partial payment) 4,000.00 Bicycle Colorado - Contribution 2,000.00 Uptown Grill - CAST meeting (Dinner) 1,407.67 The Antlers - CAST meeting (Lunch) 380.00 Town of Winter Park - Reimbursement for supplies, postage (7/1 - 12/31/92) 272.03 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 8,141.70 DKS/emw :financia.112 sti CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 143 EAST MEADOW DRIVE SUITE 498 VAiL. COLORADO 81657 BRUCE D. CHAPMAN• TELEPHONE: (303) 476.0075 B.C. ANDERSON TELECOPIER: (303) 476-0078 'Also Admitted in Florida January 1 2 , 1 9 9 3 E.t.N. ea.,,oaaoo Larry Eskwith, Esq. Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Booth Creek Local Improvement District Assessment Our File No. 2216.1 Dear Mr. Eskwith: Please be advised that I represent a group of property owners within the Booth Creek Local Improvement District ("District"). A listing of the individuals and their addresses is attached hereto as Exhibit A. As of December 15, 1992, the Town Council of the Town of Vail passed Ordinance 31, Series 1992 which approved an assessment against parcels of land within the District. Said assessment was in the amount of $487,187.00. This assessment is substantially in excess of the amount designated in the district bonds dated August 15, 1989 and does not fall within the exceptions permitted under the bond documents. The assessment increase contains approximately $89,000 in interest expense which was totally foreseeable by the Town of Vail and but for mismanagement, negligence or oversight on the part of the Town of Vail would not been incurred. Please be apprised that a complaint will be filed with the Eagle County District Court to require that the Town of Vail set aside the assessment approved at the December 15, 1992 hearing and second reading of Ordinance 31. ry truly yours, if B.C. Anderson BCA:cb cc: Mr. Jorge Navas Sent by Hand Delivery EXHIBIT A PLAINTIFF' NAMES PROPERTY ADDRESS / MAILING ADDRESS Mara Grasis Bossow 3235 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO P.O. Box 5055, Vail, CO 81658 Crown Corr, Inc. 3275 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO (Joseph J. Pellar) P.O. Box 1750, Highland, IL 46322 John W. Gray 3241 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO 3819 Janitell Road Colorado Springs, CO 80906 J. Edward Gund 3100 Booth Falls Court Vail, CO 81657 Edward M. Gwathmey and 3226 Katsos Ranch Road Katherine P. Gwathmey Vail, CO 81657 Brandy Lee McLaughlin Wall 3241 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO and Douglas L. Wall P.O. Box 112, Vail, CO 81658 Jacqueline B. Lind 3145 Booth Falls Court, Vail, CO 2 Driver Lane, Littleton, CO 80123 Jorge A. Navas and 3255 Katsos Ranch Road Sybil R. Navas Vail, CO 81657 John Galt Mountaineering, 3245 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO Ltd. 193 Gore Creek Dr., Vail, CO 81657 Michael D. Steimle, 3220 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO Cynthia R. Steimle, P.O. Box 2024, Vail, CO 81658 John D. Steimle and Ruth K. Steimle Joe H. Tonahill, Jr. 3140 Booth Falls Court, Vail, CO (former owner) P.O. Box 3326, Vail, CO 81658 Vail Mountain School 3160 Katsos Ranch Road, Vail, CO P.O. Box 602, Vail, CO 81658 p ~ w:a~-a~+c~ RACE; t"~,,~."~~r 1 1 1~Q3 _~~~~~~~~l~t, ~JJoar~ o~,E%1/a~er commissioners ~~xt~ cotiyi o~ 1600 W. 12th Avenue Denver, CO 80254 Phone (303) 628-6000 , ~J ~ sFn~ ~ 'fe{ecopier No. (303) 628-6509 ~ HUBERT A. FARBES, JR., President +s 04°~ MALCOLM M. MURRAY, 1st Vice•President cau~xr o`,`++ MONTE PASCOE DONALD L. KORTZ MS. ROMAINE PACHECO HAMLET J. BARRY, ill . Manager January 8, 1992 Dear Community Leader, As this new year begins, Denver Water is exploring new ways to satisfy the water needs of city and suburban customers on the Denver water system well into the future. Denver Water will involve other metropolitan c~~tLLt,anities in its planning efforts and is open to cooperative ventures that are in the best interest of our customers. However, Denver is not a metropolitan-wide supply agency and other c~.tttttunities will have to assert their own water plans and interests. The reasons for this position were articulated by Water Board President, Hubert Farbes in a presentation to the Colorado Water Congress a little over a year ago. As an individual interested in vital public policy matters, we felt you would like to have a copy of this presentation in order to have a full understanding of the directions being taken by Denver Water. We hope you enjoy reading it and if there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, r~ Hamlet "Chips" Barry Manager encl: CONSERVE WATER! w ~i(~ PRESENTATION TO THE 34TH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE COLORADO WATER CONGRESS "A New Path for the Denver Water Depa~ l~.~ent" Hubert A. Farbes, Jr. I'.~~ident, Denver Board of Water Commissioners On Friday, November 22, ]991, the Administrator of USEPA, Bill Reilly, publicly released a letter to the Denver Water Depa~:,...ent regarding the Agency's position on the Two Forks Water Storage Project application. Denver's two major dailies reacted to the letter with headlines which illustrate the confusion engendered by this volatile issue: one headline read "Denver: Two Forks is Dead"; the other read "EPA Ruling Re-Opens Gate to Two Forks." Other events of the past two months, including the filing of litigation by the Metropolitan Providers against EPA (which the Denver Water Board has declined to join) ,can only have exacerbated the confusion of metro area citizens on these issues. And while the Denver Water Board is only one of many participants in this complex struggle, the Board's members, having grappled for years with these issues, believe that present day events now compel a new path for Denver and its citizens in management and protection of its valuable water supply system. A succinct statement of our thoughts and perceptions may assist in clearing the fog of confusion now settled over the water supply future for metro Denver. Since its f„....ation in 1918 from a series of water companies the Denver Water Department has been the central focus for water devel„r...ent to benefit the entire Denver metropolitan area. In succeeding years, Depa.l..~ent lawyers have acquired water rights, its engineers have designed and built storage and transmission and treatment facilities, and its employees have assured that distribution lines are extended throughout the metropolitan area. Denver residents and ratepayers have financed all of these activities and operations from revenue bonds and user fees, and the system has grown to become the largest water supply and distribution syslr.u. in the West. Over the first half of the 20th Century, suburban areas ~ .~v up around Denver, were annexed into Denver, and water service was provided through the _ Department's systems. In time, some of the suburbs that did not annex into Denver were offered access to water supply by contract with the Depa.l...ent; and few suburban goy mental units developed independent or competing water systems because good quality water was available through Denver at reasonable rates. By 1960, virtually all water planning for the Denver metropolitan area revolved around, or depended upon the Denver Water Depa.l...ent and the policies of its managing Board of Commissioners. In the last 25 years, however, many changes have occurred which alter the assumptions and understanding upon which Denver's water system was built. ]n 1974, the Poundstone Amendment was adopted to Colorado's Constitution; effectively precluding Denver from annexation .,rrortuniiies available to every other home rule city in the State. Suitable locations for water storage impoundments are now a relatively scarce commodity, as water suppliers have claimed and developed the best storage sites. Public values and opinions on water development, particularly concerning instream flow preservation and avoidance or mitigation of reservoir impacts; have changed dramatically; and procedural and substantive requirements of "environmental" laws have purposely restricted the access to, and escalated the costs and risks of loss for water development projects. A proliferation of suburbs around Denver has added layers of institutional and political complexity to water supply _ issues, as a number of suburban communities jostle for perceived independence through separate, self-perpetuating water supply systems disconnected from Denver. Finally, the effective cost of acquiring and developing water has increased at a shocking pace. The dramatically escalating costs have driven Denver's suburban customers to protest, then litigate the increases in and relative level of the Depa~ l~~~ent's out-city rates; and independent suburban water syslr...s now face frightening prospects for the per unit cost of developing future water supply. Into this caldron of complex facts and charged emotions, add the Environmental Protection Agency's recent veto of three possible configurations for a proposed Two Forks Water Storage Project. Two Forks was the only nominated alternative for cooperative, rather than fragmented water supply devel,.r..~ent under Denver's agreement with suburban "Providers" for water supply devel~r..~ent to benefit the whole metropolitan community. Is there any wonder that the press, and the public, are confused about the meaning of recent events, and where those events will lead us in the future? The historic role of the Denver Water Department as the single agency to whom all metro area residents could look for global plans and solutions for water supply problems, turns every head toward the Denver Water Board at times such as these. For, as uncomfortable as their relationship has been-in the past, Denver's suburban communities have relied upon Denver citizens, through their Board of Water Commissioners, to advocate for and support water supply devel~r...ent for, the entire metro area. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that suburban residents clearly understand the effect of the many events and issues noted above: Denver's citizens and its Water Board can no longer afford to undertake their historic role; and the Denver Water Board, having assessed its assets and obligations in light of present events, has chartered a new and different path for future participation in metropolitan water supply and devel~r..~ent. What does the "new path" mean for the many issues facing this region? Here are some specific examples which answer the question clearly. Does the "new path" mean that no water supply project will ever be developed at the Two Forks site? NO, it does not . mean that. EPA'S Veto, "clarified" by the Agency as only EPA can do, explicitly applies only to the Project proposals, submitted by Denver and the other Project applicants (i.e., 1.1, .450 and .400 million acre foot reservoir proposals). The veto does not extend to or affect the Two Forks site per se; and Bill Reilly's letter of November 8 appears to invite interested parties to submit other devel.,r~~~ent proposals, for review "on their merits," to the Army Corps of Engineers. Does Denver's "new path" mean that the Department will no longer provide water to suburban users who rely on contracts with Denver as their primary or sole source of water supply? No, it certainly does not! The Denver Water Board will continue to provide not only high quality water service, at very low rates, to present and future residents of Denver; it will also serve all present and future suburban users within a fixed "distributor" service area agreed upon with the Depa~ l~~~ent. These fixed service commitments, now being negotiated with all Denver's existing suburban district cus~~u~ers, will provide for water supply comparable to the supply available inside Denver (i.e. without historic tap restrictions or limits), will extend through "build out" of the fixed service area, and will be provided at rates which, while higher than inside Denver water rates, represent a fraction of the cost necessary to develop and deliver water service independent of Denver's systems. Does the Denver Board's "new path" mean that Denver will not, as in the past, lead the metro area in competing for, acquiring and developing major new water rights for the entire area" Yes, that is exactly what Denver's "new path" means. With respect to water service outside Denver's existing service area, it is now unlikely that the Denver Water Board will initiate any new large scale water _ development project to provide water service outside its fixed service areas. Denver's project devel~r...ent role will likely be limited to those activities necessary for protection or devel.,ru~ent of Denver's existing water rights to meet future needs of its service area. The extraordinary costs of future large projects, coupled with the fixed boundaries now established for the City of Denver and Denver's substantial reserves for water supply have a1L~.~d the "devel~ru.ent initiative" which motivated Denver Water Board members in years past. The Denver of today ,along with those "y suburban "distributor" customers who make firm water supply agreements with Denver, requires devel.,r...ent of new water supply only to the extent Denver's existing reserves of water are not sufficient for "buildout" of the Denver service area over the next 30 to 50 years. Denver and its distributors will not need water supply development to the extent that a substantial portion of the metro area, lying outside the "fixed obligation" boundaries of Denver's service area, will have such needs. In simple terms, the cost of major.water supply development for the entire metro area, i.e.primarily to benefit water users outside Denver's service area, is now both extravagantly high and without significant benefit for Denver's citizens and service area customers. Finally, will the Board's "new path" allow Denver to participate to any degree _ . in metro area water supply development activities? Yes, it certainly will. Although Denver can no longer be expected to take the lead in metropolitan area water supply development, the Denver Water Board will continue to cooperate with others who initiate devel..ru~ent proposals for new water supply to the metro area. The Board recognizes that Denver's system is and will probably remain the largest and most important component of any major water development proposal for the metropolitan area; and that .any new major water storage/development project probably cannot r r' . effectively operate absent coordination with and utilization of the Denver sysl,~u~ facilities. The Denver Water Boazd will continue to work with other metro water providers to make Denver's system work for the benefit of others, so long as Denver's existing rights and abilities to develop and deliver water for its citizens and customers aze not impaired. The constraints upon, and public opinions regazding water devel~rL.ent have changed in many ways since Denver developed the "large" Dillon project in the 1950's. I believe the constraints and opinions will continue to change as water supply requirements continue to evolve in the future. The municipal water development interests of this state, and particulazly those along the Front Range, will survive those changes only by adapting our goals and strategies as new circumstances confront us. The members of the Denver Water Boazd believe that new institutional goals and strategies are now required to fulfill our chap lr.. and contract obligations; but we also believe that, as others are willing to undertake new roles with us, our metropolitan community will find a way to reach and accomplish the common goal of reliable and safe water supplies for the future. u ' 1y TOWN OF VAIL ~ Gasoline Fisber January 12, 1993 " - T0: Town Council Members FR: Caroline RE: National Brotherhood of Skiers We are in the throws of putting together a warm communitywide welcome for this group of 5,000 which arrives this week. 1. We sent the attached letter, signed by Peggy, Frank, and Andy to all merchants which gives background on the group and reminds them of the revenue the group will bring to the community. We are encouraging all local businesses to post the attached flier as a welcome gesture in their place of business. 2. We are taking out a full page ad in the Vail Trail with a letter of welcome from Peggy, Frank and Andy. . . " . . 3. We are having a placque made which thanks the NBS for choosing Vail for its 20th - - Anniversary Summit. Peggy will present this on behalf of TOV and the community at the NBS President's Dinner on Jan. 20. Numerous questions have been asked regarding the Town's plan for welcoming this group... if approached about this, you can fill them in..... „~?~~o- a ~~er ~~e ~d~r. ~orn ~e~ ~ ~,~u~h. ~Ccrrrt~ ~r 11 Iy TOWN OF PAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479 2100 FAX 303-479-2157 January 11, 1993 Dear Vail Valley Merchant: The Vail Valley community will welcome an estimated 5,000 skiers as part of the National Brotherhood of Skiers' (NBS) 20th Anniversary Summit from January 16 - 23, 1993. We are pleased this organzation chose the Vail Valley as the host site for this year's event and would like to take this opportunity to provide you with their background. The NBS, initially formed 19 years ago, is a national organization of North American ski clubs with predominantly black memberships. The first annual summit was hosted in Aspen and saw attendance of 470 skiers. Since that time the organization has grown to include over 75 ski dubs, with memberships totalling 14,000 skiers in 62 cities throughout the Gauntry. While camaraderie and fun is an important part of every NBS summit, the mission and focus of the organization is far more extensive. The NBS seeks to identify, select, and finance the training of potentia{ Olympic-calibre, minority youth to win berths on the United States Ski Team. The annual summft plays a major role in this mission. From an economic perspective, the Vail Valley is very fortunate to be hosting this event. Each year, the NBS fuels the host ski town's economy with several million dollars worth of revenue. For example, the 1991 summit infused approximately $6 million into host site Park City's economy during their one week stay. As well, NBS members are known for returning to host sites with family and friends time and time again following a positive summit experience. We are looking forward to a fun and successful week with the National Brotherhood of Skiers. This event will provide us with a tremendous opportunity to showcase our offerings to one of the largest and most important ski clubs in the world. Please join us in extending a warm welcome to the NBS and its affiliates. As part of our community wide welcoming, we are encouraging all local businesses to post the attached flier on a cash register or other visible location. Let's all work together to let these individuals know we appreciate their business. For more information, please call the Vail Village Visitors Center at 479-1394, or the Lionshead Visitors Center at 479-1385. Sincerely, C~~ ~ O~x osS ~ y' 1U . ar a et A. Os~rfoss And Dal Frank Johnson 9 Y Y Mayor President President Town of Vail Vail Associates Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau The Vail Valley Community Extends a WELCOME to the NATIONAL BROTHERI-FOOD OF SKIERS January 16 - 23,1993 Thank You for Choosing Vail, Colorado, for Your 20th Anniversary Summit Li TOWN OF VAIL PROBLEM LIST The Systems Assessment performed for the Town of Vail by Browne, Bortz Coddington, Inc. (BBC identified three key issues which must be addressed if the Town is to make substantial progress. For each of these key issues, the "root causes" of the problem are listed. 1. Fear and Lack of Trust a. Council is out of touch with emplovees' work. Most staff doubt that Town Council really understands or cares to know what really happens in town government. Both employees and most Council members recognize that Council is out of touch with the employees' work. ,This is exacerbated by the turnover in Council every two years. It is difficult for Council as a group to have a firm understanding of every Town department. b. Employee communication with Council is restricted. Staff believe that Town personnel policy prohibits them from discussing issues with Council members. Some employees told us of severe reactions from Town management if they went outside f.,,,,,al channels to - Council. Some employees even believe that. they are not allowed to attend Council meetings. c. Many employees fear reprisal. The distrust and fear staff have of the Town Manager, and in some cases other administrative staff, have several roots. We begin by identifying what works well. Staff that work directly with. the. Town Manager on a day-to-day basis are generally very positive about their working relationships. Ratings of management and supervision were very high among staff within the Town Manager's Office in the Mountain States employee survey. This was confirmed in BBC's interviews. One of the reasons for this is that the Town Manager is more visible and accessible to staff within the Town Manager's Office, as would be natural for any individual holding this position in Town government. The greater the physical distance from the Town Manager, the greater the feeling of isolation and fear. Among department heads, we sense a reluctance to openly discuss important issues in group meetings with the Town Manager. There is fear among these individuals of bringing up any surprises in a group setting. Because of prior negative experiences, in some cases department heads do not bring sensitive issues directly to the Town Manager, but instead go to other senior managers who have a closer •1- u working relationship with the Town Manager. There is a core team of senior staff, including the Town Manager, that work very well together, but most department heads do not feel part of this team. While this is a natural part of any organization structure, the level of fear among certain senior managers is beyond what is healthy for an effective management team. Throughout the organization, staff are afraid of being embarrassed or criticized. Rightly or wrongly, they also fear losing their jobs. Parttcularly iri Vall, where would senior managers get a similar position? 2. Communication and Decision Making Town of Vail decision making and communicatton suffer from most of the negative aspects of traditional hierarchical organizations. Certain conditions in Vail government lead to further breakdowns. a. Vail has a f.,~.~,al, hierarchical decision making structure. The Town usually operates under a system of formal chain of command. Therefore, it suffers from many of the same problems of any such organization. Issues raised by front-line staff go to their supervisors up to the department head, and often from the department head to the Town Manager. In some cases, issues will go to Council. Once a decision is reached, it is reported back down through the organization. Front line staff must often stop while they wait for a decision that is slowed by many layers of the organization. This might be in the middle of digging a hole in a street (so holes sometimes must be refilled while awaiting a decision). So many decisions going through the chain of command slow tl~e process. Further, the quality of the information available to the front line staff deteriorates through each step of the process. b. Town Manager and Council deal with issues that are inconsistent with their annronriate roles. The Town Manager, and especially Town Council, deal with issues that are inappropriate for those levels of the organization. Council and the Town Manager have traditionally focused too much on controlling inputs to Town operations and insufficient time to desired outputs or outcomes. The Town is a $25 million a year organization in which Council members spend time on minor personnel issues and the purchase of chairs for Council chambers. Often, Councll fails to tackle major long term issues affecting the Town, instead focusing on details for which their effort is not productive. This leads Council members to put too many hours into this job, and diverts attention from where it is most needed. There is some indication that this situation is improving. For example, this budget cycle is the first time that department heads have budget responsibility. In the past, the Town. Manager and Town Council would review individual line items in each depa~ l.,,ent's -2- 4 P k budget. This process was time consuming and frustraring for all concerned. This year, department heads were provided budget totals and given the responsibility and authority to allocate resources within that budget to best meet department objectives. This is a major improvement over past budget reviews. Also, in prior years, Town Council would establish number of staff posirions for each department. Departments now have somewhat more flexibility in stail3ng. c. External customer demands receive priority. The hierarchical decision making structure in Vail operates more smoothly and quickly when issues relate to external customer needs, especially when citizens complain to Council or the Town Manager, than when issues relate to internal customer requests. Throughout the study, it was clear that when an external customer complains, they receive a quick response. Work for other external customers is put aside while the Town responds to urgent complaints. Most internal customer needs are put behind external customers. This gives many employees the perceprion that they are unimportant. Council and management sometimes fail to recognize that responding to internal needs allows staff to better meet external customer needs without any breakdowns in the system. d. Managers lack clear guidance on directions for department programs. We found departments needing leadership on major questions regarding direction and policies for the department. They are stymied in getting clear direction and expectations of the Town Manager and Council. Each department has major questions that can only be answered by Council. Lack of guidance limits their ability to move ahead to better meet customer needs. Either the decision making system has been too cumbersome for these decisions to be made, or depa~ l,~~ent heads have been discouraged and have not made the effort to obtain answers to these decisions. Without overall guidance, individual decisions have to be pushed up the management ladder, adding to the volume of the information flow and decision delays. e. There is insufficient attenrion to morivarin~ employees throughout the or~anizarion. Whether or not there is a pattern of positive feedback within an organizarion, it usually starts at the top of the organizarion. As discussed previously, top-down communications are more often negarive than positive. •3- a 0 3. Teamwork With the changes recommended above, especially delegation of additional responsibility and authority to departments, more decision making will take place among teams working within and between program areas. However, teamwork within the Town is currently underdeveloped. We anticipate more breakdowns in systems if e.,ff'ective teamwork is not fostered within and between departments. a. Teams have not been empowered t~ make decisions; such decisions are more often top-down. In the past, team recommendations may not have been implemented. b. Town employees have not been trained in team skills. c. Inf~~,,,ation necessary for imnrovlna systems is often not available (e.g., comprehensive customer survey data, cost data). d. Responsibilities overlap amon~s departments (e.g., design review and inspection, dispatch and Fire operations). Many employees feel strong loyalty to their departments, but for reasons outlined in this report, often do not feel they are an integral part of Town government. They do not put a priority on working with other departments. -4- - _ _ ~ Exploring Today'sReaHties ' - ' ~ ' - January 26, 1993 Y n>~ HONORABLE MR. JUS ~ SCE DOUGLAS H. CARRL I r~~RS Supreme Court Judge Ontario Court of Justice, Toronto The Canadian Way: Comments on National Healthcare Presented By _ f The Vail Symposium , Dr. Richard and Susan Hawkins Murray Merkley The Lodge at Vail Breakfast at 7:30 A.M. F ' Program at 8:00 A M. (1 Cost is 812 per person ` Reservations n.:.::.,..,.ry: Ca11476-0954 The Symposium Breakfast Series is organized for and open to the public _ ~ n, ¦ . ¦ , - lvar B. ~and~l • ° - DIPlA1lAAT~, ~1M~RIC~N 80ARD OF P~~1~ITRICS P~.DI~i t~iG ~'~OL~SC~ENT1Ul~DiCiN~ December 29, 1992 Chief of Police Town of Vail Department of Police 75 Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Sir: On Saturday evening December 12, 1992 I and my family were involved in a multicar accident on the interstate highway going through Vail. The car was heavily damaged, but fortunately no one was seriously injured. I am writing in order to compliment one of your officers, Rusty Jacobs, for his kind assistance and comfort during a most upsetting and confusing incident. He acted in the most professional and courteous manner possible and allowed our vacation to resume a more normal routine. I hope our next visit to your area does not have such an auspicious beginning! Sincerely, Ivar B. Fandel, M.D. 9640 GR1ffIN RQAD • COOP~R.GTY, f1AR]DA 33328 - C305) 434.1595 SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 1- 8-93 ~ 1345 ~ 30332872~7i 3034792157# if 5 . • January 7, 1993 - 12;0$ ' 'ti ' e~ Ct7lfhlTY suaolNG 551 BIdDAD1NtAM OFFICE OF 7F~ P.O. 8dX 850 60/NtD 4f COMMISStt)IdEiLS ' EAQ.E, CC!!t]Rgp7 Slt33t . y,.. {303j32B-Bta05 ' FAX: (303)32$•7707 EAGLE ~I~UN~Y, Ct7Lt~RAC~ i AGENDA B4.~RD OF CO[JNTY CUMMISSIOIV>G~S REGULAR 11~]?~i~~G DAY 7ANLTAR,Y 11, 1993 ov:4o , 0~:34 wo~x sr~ss~oN - w ~>~Y UF.I]ATE and 1~ENDIlITG .LITIGATION Mr. ~nzr cRn.~s ~xs~ James R. Fiitze, COlgity ManBgF~C Kevin Lindahl, County Attgmey 10:30 - 11:30 WORK SESaIQN 17YIE i,a ISBILL & ASSOCIATES xr Hoer ta~o,~s ltoox RE: AIItPORT LA'1~'(I?UT FLAN I]en R~ynalds, Airport Manager 11;30 -12:44 A14,~ ~Li~l'I~ TO BEA4 Ln CREEK SUBDIVISION r~sc~ce c~urtrrxavx AGR~IIMENTS ~ EMPiAYEE HOUSING Deny Flynn, Vail Associ2ttes ACTION: Consider apprcoval. x:00 - 41:30 ***LUNCkIss* 4X:30 ~ 01:45 CONS.~rr I~ CALEI~IDAR ' HACd~ (aOUM'Ylit7(~ RA4?S At*d ROi1371VKdtYD n1UJY-(R7MXOYF.l9;~AL NrlTilREefRE'FIdCBLt UNTdS L~O11~4'P GL81~$iAR TY]ALII)W TEB~iRD OF (~Ot~l1flY (niVMhsSIgN s(~S 7Y] SPSI~GD !93 7lHS AXb F.'NERCi7' DJV !I(t7RE IxFORTANT 17d31f3 ON A L8Mfi7flY ACrENOA. ANY CXJxxLSS7011~sRM.iYR8QU1~'1'7?L1TANlZBAd BS 'REilfOi+~'FR!}x 77~s QDNS~M'C,t1LENDeIRMID CUNSIDS7tFD SBP.l1LJ7ELY. dtVYddEAIB~2 OF TRB,~uB,GTGxdl "IPEQUIsSl".iM'IlEad BE 7~C11~D' FROx Fes' G9~IKSSNtdt~N®t~i. 1. BILL PAYING Linda Fankuch, Acoountrng Mark Si1vt~#horn, Aging Controller ACTION: Arr..~~~lal subject to review by the County Manager. SENT BY-EAGLE COUNTY ; 1- 8-93 ; 13 46 ; 3033287207-~ 3034792157;# 2/ 5 2. CONTRACT S.r±,;i ~PEEhi EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO AND STATE OF COLORADO, DEPARTMENT ' OF REALTB FOYt SP.CCIAL ~ JP'FL~ENTAL hOOD PROGRAM I'[1R WOMEN, Il'+l~`ANTS AND ~1~.~REN (WI'G7 WffiCII anr, STATE WI4L FAY $ 25,620.OU Margie gates, Director of Nursing . ACTION: Consider approval. 3. EXECUTYON OF FIRST A]IIENDNffi~IT TO INCLUSION AGR~+.r.~aIET11'P BETV~ ~,~?1 VAIL VALLEY CUNSOLII'1A r~.,+ WA~.art TlISTRICT AND EAGLE COUlwi r James R. Fritze, County Mane~ger AC~1vN: Consider approval. 4. COUNTY VE11~.rtANS SERVICE OrrY.:~i'S MOh'r.Y1.Y REFOItT AND CER ~r 1~ rCATION QF PAX l~R DEa,' +1~~ER Jack JOhI1SUt1, Vel:.r~..s Service QNiCtir Ar.110N; Consider arr.~..va1, RE50LUTYON Ct~l1+I11ZF1VDING JOHNNEY ~ ~ P~-II'S AS CI.ERrC AND RECURDER 7aek b. Lewis, Assistant County Manager ACTION: Consider ~,~,r. ~~~al. 6. RESOLa,11UN CO11IiV1F~„~~, rG RICHARD L. GUSTAFSON AS CHAIR1vrAN Ja~ek D. Lewis, Assistant County Manager ACTION: Consider ~r~.~~,ral. 01:4~ -02:00 I. FINAL SETTLEMENT - KOLBE S'TRIgING cov~vrrRUC,ad Kevin Lh:dahl, County Attorney ACTION: +Co'nsides ar~~ oval. II. LEASE AGR,~~VT BETW r~?+T EAGLE VALLEY Y,IRRARY DISTRICT AND EAGLE CUUiV'TY, STATE C!F COLORADO James R. Prifii~e, County Manager ACTIt~N: Consider approval. III. CONTRACT AGREEMENT $ETWEEN B & B COMM[JNI+CATIONSi INC. AND EAGLE COUNTY ElViS COUNCIL A. J. 7ahnson, County Sheriff Kr~ige Kenney, Presi,de.nt, FMS Council ACTION: Consider arr:.~.~fa1. SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 1- 8-93 13 46 ~ B033287207i 3Q34792157~# 3r' 5 i i IV. RFSOLT,ITIUN AI'.PO!Il~ Y ~ +iG ANN BORMC?LINI AND ~ WILLIAM TI?,:nY.a.L TQ ,old. EAGLE 'VALLEY LIBRARY BOARD OF DIRECTQRS Kevin Lindaril, C~tlnty Attorney AGTI4N: Con$idI~r approval. 42:04 y 42:05' RESQLIITI~lN SIGNING ~cr~s cvaxrrROasr Mary Kessler, I3ffice M~oa$er, Community L3evel~.~ r . , .::....t • ACTItyNs COnsider ~rY~,~~~ai, 02:05 -02:30 AWARD PENTATIgN saw c~oumrl¢oou 02:34 - RECEPTION FUR (~I~1TGOING BQARD OF COUNTY CONIIVIL~SIONERS rol~re.~,.~~.a rrr~~rte cavuxrrieao~v TIIEi NEST Mrni..JCi OF THE BA(I<.E COUNTY CCx?~1~I15SIUNSRS WILL 8E II&I~ OH JANUARY 1?,19Q3 THIS A s,a.~,. A IS PRiO~ ...as.~ FOR 1Nk~kMATIONAL I'iIRP08ID ONLY - A1J,7'LMBS ARE APPR00£IIYIATS. THI3 BOARD WlI.~ IN SRSSIOI~f MANX CON~IDBIt t~~aa.r..t PI'IsMS'CHAT ARR I{ROUGICP $I8 II'. SENT BY~EAGLE CQUNTY ~ 1- ~-93 ~ 134? ~ 3Q332872Q7-~ 3Q34792157~# 4/ S ~ ' January 7, 1993 - 14:0 EAGLE CALpdTY BUIIPAVG • ' ^~r 551 AR4ApWAY OFFICE ~ 7?1E . - • ' ~ : ~ ' ~ P.O. FJOX 950 80AI~u QF COMMIS~IER3 ~ . ' EAGLE. COLORA[7d 9! 03 I {3035 3$9-'605 F~Ix: (303j 33&7201 R"• EAGLE C~l11VTY, ~tJL~RADC~ AGENDA - BOAR17 OF COUNTY C+(]MMISSIONF.RS REGULAR. IVIEETING DAY JANUARY 12, 1993 11:04 - 11:50 SWEARING IN ~.~IIVIONY OF G'(111R~SSI.~NFRS-ACT, J~l,~ru+RV~i r~ ~ T ~ AND JAIVYI!S E. J~0?HNSbN, JR-, AND AP1'CJYI~ x r,,~,r CLERK AND RECORDER, SARA J. 11:50 ~ 12:00 CUh~r+:?~l'1' CAi~ENDAR ~ac~ aoaxrraooar '77~11fs OF A FMU771VEA1V17 NOIKCOMROVFRSLiL N~lTU17~'.UlE PLI~ a1v7>~ CQCA~J~AR !Yl dLLOiY ZEE BtadB'b [1~` cxr~Nrr avx~rrssTOna~¢s n7 srsnra rrs r~ aa® SJiCi~1i'GY aN ~are~ I11rP~ORlAxl' Mrs axe r~.ri, ~Nf? CaM~1llB.YlaA~el1~AYRSsjU~57'7HATAN[TSA(BB REAiOYSD'F1008rIREL10A~5'8~Y7'C~1LJKAl1~GtlA.~..:~.~P3.6P'ARdTEL7 ANP' alLJiIBEE l~ 7HE t7181lC JrAY 'RHQU&ST" ANY 17~Ir BE '1lBJItOY~7 • FROAr THE L~OJK9flIYT d(~E1~4l. i. It'~S!")LUTICIN CON~;.r.KNING AFl'pIrITN1ENT5 lack D. Lewis, Assistant County Manager' ACTION: Consider air. ~ gal. RTSC?1.I.lY~!uN AI'.~OINTINiGF SARA J. FISHTIt. AS CLERI{ AND RECUItI1LR Jack D. Lewis, County Manager ACTION: Cor>I~der ~.r,,..~, aal. SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 1- 8-93 13.48 ; 3Q3328720?-~ 3D34792157;# 51 5 3. RESOLUTIONDE5IGNATIltiTG1~i~~i~t~iGSl?F i,ri~~ARti OIa' Ct~U1VTY CUNIMIS.SIONERS, k,~+~ia..il, HOUItS~ AND LEGALH~LIDAXS OF ink COUNTY OF EAGLE, STA?T~ Off` COLORADO, FOR FISCAL YEAYt 19~?~ Jack U. Lewis, County Manager Aa.. iil]N: Consickr ar r ~a1. 4. RESOLUTION OOlVIl4IIIVDING I~NALD H. WELCH AS t".UMiVIISSIONIIt Jack D. Lewis, County Ma~get ACTION: Consider approval. 5. RESOLUTION CUMMENDllwIG RICHARD L. GUSTAFSON AS CUIVJMISSIONEit Jack D. Lewis, County Manager At..,i,ON: Consider a~,~„~~ra1. ~2:~ - 02:OQ ***I,[tNCH:*: ~rt~eacc ~ rr~~~ r~caaotn~s TH& Nls'XT Ll~1'ING OP THB t3AOL8 COUNTY 0011H1U5570N~.S WI[,~. IBB 1n3LU aN ]ANUARY !!!,1493 Tl~i AGBNDA 19 PRO~..,,5.~ F~ u: k:• . ~a~dA'T'IONAL F11Rr „yt,., QNLY - AT.l. TtMt3S ARS APPRQXIIRATE. TEI<!i ]30ARD WII.t3 1N SEliBION MAY CON3IDt3Q Crl'Nt3R 1TB[ri.4 THAT ARE B~tOUf/H3' 1i13HC~{Ea rt'. Yv _ W sJ i/ • : - SUNDAY ~ ' `POSTSCRIPT = Sunday, January 10, 1993 Goodb e ~ = Watch Martina run. Run, Martina, run. ® Run, run, run. ~ , The years pass, and people like you dame and go. Meanwhile, the rest of us ' • ~~y~-' y~ ~ = -those who truly love this state will 1 ~,j j 1 , _ stay here. and work hard to make it a - better place to live. TOO 1 ~ "That's how communities work. You V b e live there, you .invest there, you work there, you plan to die there. And along J the way, you try to make it a better ` nd good riddance, too,. Martina ! - place. Navratilova. Adios. Sayonara. `Some of us have lived here all our Don't let the door hit you in the ; ~ ~ lives, preferring it over places like New butt. on your way out. 1 'York or Los Angeles or Atlanta. Or Colorado is for,people who want to live Czechoslovakia. here. Work here.' Invest here. Enjoy life ~ It isn't always easy, and it isn't always here. And die here. .nice. But it's home. If, with all your millions and your fan- i was against Amendment 2, just like cy-house in Aspen, you don't find it to be ~ you were, Martina. I worked against it. I Heaven on Earth, then you're certainly was sorry it passed. I think it was a mis- welcome out. .take. And I'll work to find a way out of it. Go look somewhere else. But I won't run. Maybe you'll find Heaven on Earth in Despite Amendment 2, I know Colora- California, where bigotry and hatred and } ~ do to be filled with good people -people intolerance is far more common than in who don't hate and people who aren't Colorado. Maybe you'll find it in New bigots. Many of them voted for Amend- York City, where bigotry and hatred and ment 2, and -many of them voted against intolerance is far more common than in Amendment 2. Colorado. Maybe you'll find it in arro- I know many good, decent people who gant Atlanta, where bigotry and hatred voted for Amendment 2. They are not and intolerance is far more common homophobic, they are not bigots, they do . than in Colorado. _ not hate. And most of them will work Maybe you will, but probably you hard to find a better solution to civil won't. ~ rights than they believed Amendment 2 Heaven isn't on to be. - Earth, and so you ° They don't like the anger and the threats won't find it in ..and the emotional violence of recent Aspen or in Palm weeks, any more than you do, Martina. $each, or on Ro- `But they live here, it is their home, and deo Drive. To find they will work to make it a better place Heaven, .you've to live. got to do more And, because of the hard work by them than throw arich- and by many who disagree with them, _ bitch fit, order `Colorado will continue to be a good place - ~iUCB your valet to pack °to live. We will work our way out of the your bags and fly Amendment 2 rancor, as a community, by Learjet to an- gays and straights together. other posh ad- it will be painful at moments, it will dress. It's a much longer, and much less get ugly at times, it will seem hopeless in comfortable, journey than that. ~ dark hours. Colorado is about as close as you'll But we will stay here, we will work it 'come in this life, though. but, and we will succeed. Yeah, we've got our problems. We've This isn't Heaven. Hell, it isn't even Io- got some pollution, we've got our dis- ,wa. agreements, we've got our social and our It's Colorado. I'm glad to live here, and economic problems. And there are some heaven can wait. bigots among us, for-sure. Meanwhile, you're welcome to leave if This is Colorado, not Heaven. that's your whim. Search for your nirva- But if you live on Earth, you're stuck ba somewhere else. ~ with some problems. You can run from But sometime you might pause to ask them, but you'll never be able to get yourself why your nirvana never seems ` away from them - no matter how many ~ to be where you are. millions you spend on travel. Why, in your frantic search for perfec- You fled your native Czechoslovakia tjon, can't you .stay in one place and because it wasn't Heaven on Earth. You Make it a better dace to live? fled the relationship with your lesbian ~ Run, Martina, run. - lover because it wasn't Heaven on Earth. .chuck Green is editor of me edreoNai pages. You now are threatening to flee Colorado - - . _ - because it isn't Heaven on Earth. • WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP January 8, 1993 (Page 1 of z) TOPIC QUESTIONS _ FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 11119 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES LARRY E.IANDY/MIKE M.: What can be done to make Locations for the newspaper boxes have been determined and approved these uniform and locations less prolific? by all TOV departments. Staff will talk to Larry E. to determine if voluntary agreements or an ordinance outlining locations are appropriate. Working on wrap-up by early winter 1993. 1992 02/i7 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTAN/ANDY; Draft Ordinance. Larry E. will further explore the areas of non-conformities, tree lighting and number of lights, and will attempt to have this before Council at the 2126193 work session. 08/25 FOLLOW-UP WITH BUGK SHRADER PEGIPAMILARRY G.. Mr. Shrader has called to find out Lany Grafel will write to Bob Baker, attaching responses re: two issues, (CDOT)IJAKE BRAKESISPEED whether there has been improvement on the maintenance i.e., fake brakes and speed limits. Larry G. will continue to "reason" with LIMITS ON VAIL PASS for the west side of the bike pathlVail Pass. Although CDOT. CDOT has stepped up efforts to clean and maintain, their efforts have not been consistent, and this was communicated by Pam. 09108 1041 PLAN LARRY E.: Barbara Green has asked whether the Town of Larry E. has spoken to Barbara Green, who feels there could be a benefit (request: Steinberg) Vail has a 1041 Plan. to the Town. Therefore, Larry E. is collecting additional information and will draft an ordinance. Scheduled for further discussion at work session on 1/26/93. 09115 PAUL'S FLAG POLE LARRY G./KRISTAN/CAROLINEIRON: Whatever became Staff will review former pole placement and present recommendation. (request: Lapin) of the flag pole that was to be erected outside VRA offices honoring Paul Johnston? 09122 SPEAK-UP© MEETINGS PEGIRON/CAROLiNElBRUCE CHAPMAN/PAM: Meet to Schedule has been set as follows: Wednesday, January 27,12:00 P.M., discuss some proposed changes to the Speak-Up Meeting Wednesday, February 3, 7:30 A.M., Wednesday, February 10, 6:30 P.M. series, i.e., format, acquisition of debatable topics, presentation to annual condominium association annual meetings, speakers from "like" impacted communities (Carmel-by-the-Sea, etc.) January 8, 1993 (Page 2 of 2) 10127 ELEVATOR INSPECTION LARRY EJGARY M.IKRISTANIDICK: Tom Steinberg NWCCOG is getting together the contract, at which time it will be PROGRAM brought in a proposed resolution to adopt legislation for the presented at a 1126193 work session. (request: Steinberg) elevator inspection program. 11/03 UNPLATTED LANDS AS KRISTAN/MIKE MOLLICA: Have we followed-up with Forest Service reviewing LOA work. Jim Curnutte and Mike Mollica are DONATIONS contacting owners of parcels that may be given to TOV as reviewing parcels of interest. (request: Steinberg) gifts -understanding we are soli moving through the LOA process. 11110 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS COUNCIURON: November and December meetings have been canceled. January meeting tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, 1/20193, at 5:15 P.M., TQV Council Chambers. Between now and this meeting, staff will work with "host" entity on setting agenda, assuring attendance, etc. I 12108 VRD CONTRACT ANALYSIS STEVE B.: Peggy has called Ken Wilson to indicate A date is being set for initial meeting. Council cannot begin negotiations until the first of February. Prepare analysis of contract for Council review. 12115 LONG-TERM GOAL SETTING COUNCIUDEPT. HEADS: Please reserve ALL DAY on Tuesday, 2/9193, to discuss long-term goal setting. 1993 01105 EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY EVERYONE: First meeting scheduled Wednesday, 1113/93, FORUM SPEAK OUT MEETINGS from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., at the Eagle County Fairgrounds Exhibit Halt. The second wil! be geld at the Christie Lodge in Avon on Thursday, 1114/93, again from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.