HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-16 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1993
6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
1. Request for Funds: Avon Beaver Creek Transit.
2. Information Update.
3. Council Reports.
4. Other.
5. Executive Session: Legal Matters.
6. Adjournment.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/23/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
C:WGENDA.WS
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1993
6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXPANDED AGENDA
6:30 P.M. 1. Request for Funds: Avon Beaver Creek Transit.
' Ron Phillips
Action Reuested of Council: Approve/deny participation in the
funding of this lobbying effort.
Backaround Rationale: The Town of Avon is requesting participation
by the Town of Vail in the hiring of Liz Robbins Associates in an
attempt to receive grant funding for bus purchases. The buses
would be used in the regional bus system. Terms requested by Liz
Robbins Associates are the same as 1992's retainer. (Please see
enclosed letter from Liz Robbins Associates dated 1/19/93.) The
projected allocation of the lobbyist fees (up to a maximum of
$45,000) are as follows: BCRC ar 46.4%, Avon ar 17.5%, TOV ar
23.6%, Eagle County @ 12.5%.
6:45 P.M. 2. Information Update.
3. Council Reports.
4. Other.
5. Executive Session: Legal Matters.
7:30 P.M. 6. Adjournment.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/23/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
C:VIGENDA.WSE
SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY 2-11-93 ; 1Q~52 ; 3Q332872Q7-~ 3Q34792157;# 11 3
i
.
Pebru2l[y 11, 1993 - 8:48 EAGLE Cc71.~IiY s1~LWNG
~ 551 BR4ADLNAY
rp. Box 950
BOARD OONWIIH5510NERS EAGLE. COIARADO B 1631
{3a3j 338.8805 , FAX {3Q3j 38.7207 ~
,
E GLE ~C~UNTY, 4~~~R~IJV
Afi~~.l~
.~(~ARD U~' ~~TN~ C't1N.X~II~~If.~~~~'
09:30 - 10:30 WORK SESBIp1V -WEEKLY UPDATE ~
l,rr~,~~.rr~os~xrx„~ 7aCiC D. Lewis, County M~tager
10:30 -11:15 PENDING LITIGATION
~l~r~Jrmaorratosslaoou lames R. Fricze, County Atmmey
11:15 -11:30 :**gRCA~***
11:30 - 12:00 WORN S~`SSION REGARDING TiPS~C TA7~1
John Nichols, K2YR ttartio
12:00 - 01:30 ***1.UNCH**~
01:30 - 01:45 CONSENT CALENDAR
PrlGl?1 d~0i1r7JY RO~Iu
17'BRLSOFAR[1[1'RNEANDNAId-CO vt~•~LALNATUR&ARBPIACL]ipNTHBCUM$1~iTCA13~3~1~A~['Cd.4L1+dw7'fiEiBOAEtUUK[xJ[1NI7
cx1MA~S6[ON[crrs Tp 3PBNA ns TAlII 1~tEkt3Y Ohl Mp1tB j[~pOB7'ANT LTSM.S nN h 133hiGTH1f AGRNnA. ANY CpMM15S1PNISR TwdAY
AHQUI3YT THAT AN 1'!~M BB "R87dUV ` PRpM 71iB CpNSBNT CALBNDARAND (7pIQSID~1[1sD Bf~'ARATII.Y. ANY MBMlfl:tt OA TFIIt 1°(tULIC.
MAY •Iti3QiJIiST` ANY rl'Pdd BB • AND THE TO'VyN OF AVON, FOR ANIMAL
CONTROL ~r,rcVICES
Bob Slagle, Animal Central Supervisor
ACTION: Consider approval.
SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ; 2-11-33 ; 1053 ; 3038287207-' 3034792157;# 8l 3
a
10. AGRrr.~vvIII~TT $ET1~ rr~I~ EAGLE CUUNT~t, S'~ATiy UI1'
CULORADO ANI? ini+. TUWN OF CY:IY+'F, ~K
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Bab Slagle, Animal Control Supervisor
A?r. i aI!N: Consider approval.
y1. THy~,,~ RFrSC1LUTION CON~.~.NING 'THE CU'UNT~I*S
,r,,J,~,,ii~IPTION OF CERiu+iGATES OF PURCHASE
RESUI.TmiG F[tOM ERR(1NF.AUS SALES OF TAX LIENS,
AND AUTHORIZING 1`RF.ASURER TO FAY
INTEREST CEN SAID R,tr..~,+.~~,. Y,.ONS Ti'R(3M THE
GFNi+.RAT FUND W r r Is~~?UT 1l~JIt'I'D~ AUTIiORIZATIUN
UNTIL SAID Ih Yr.,.~r.ST PAYMENTS REACI~I'ITfIE SUlvr t7~
$1,1100.00
Sherry Brandon, County Treasurer
ACTYON: Consider approval.
01:45 -02:00 d. FINAL SEi'.a•:~M~:1~7' BI~.TI~FF.N EAGLE COUNTY,
gar~~xrw~r STATE OF COT.ARAD(y, AND Si'a:~VAItT AND
STEVENSON FUR. EAGLE CUUNTY ItEGIONAY. AY.RPpRT
AIRPORT IMPR1'~Yk''MENT PROJECT NUMBER 3-08-11020-
1~
B. FIriTAL SET'1".X.E'MIuNT I3ETWEEd~T EAGLE CUiJNTY,
STAT), GF' COLORADb, AND MACDONALD EQUIPMENT'
COMPANY FDR EAIGLE COUNTY REGIQNAY. AYRP~CIRT
AIRPORT 1[MFROVEINENT PROJECT NUN,~.~~ 3~-OS-002U-
iS
02:Op - OZ:3U A13ATF~NT HEARINGS
Cherlyn Baker, County A~sessar
I. SUNROAD GROUP, LTD.
Schedule 1Vumbers 0014719, 001721
II. SCHO()LSiDE G'~PSUM, LTD.
Schedule Number pU32634
02:30 - JAILL 1NSPECTIUN
8108 COilN!!'lU9PlC8 L1~Vf3Ht
THB MIs7LT ML+~3PliVG F THB HAGI.B C.DaN7Y (!t/MM133IOHERB WflL DG UN r7~URUARY 1993
THlS A[3l~JbA l$ pAnVllai~ll~H IHI~DRMATlONAL PURPOSZ~ ONI
Y - All. 77t.1}3.V AkG AITltL?X1AlAT13. THQ EGARd
WIl[[Ji ![Y Sl~fi4li blAY CQ wus+i "l inrsl ffSMS THAT ARFs HRpIlQHT H1~[S~ rC
. ~i rVr U'TY L'fOJ j (31.\' ~UUr
'.~~2sh~:;aton LIZ ROBB~NS ASSOCIATES ~<< - 8th Street SE
,,e:~'~,traati yes ~l ashmgtor.. DC
X000?
~e;~onene January I9, 1993
_0~ 54x_609=
ra'c 20.'544-1465
Mr. Bill James
Town Of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Dear Mr. James:
As we discussed, Z am transmitting in this letter our proposed
course of work for the Town of Avon, the administrator of the
transit system for Avon, Eagle County, and other arf iliated
jurisdictions, for 1993. You have indicated that th? transit
system wishes to pursue an appropriation for an additional 6 to 8
busses to replace the older busses leased from Vail Assoc_ates that
you now operate.
As you know from your work with us last year, it is imp~.~rtant to
begin early. You know also that funding is extremely tight, and in
fact, the final appropriation amount for those jurisdictions which
succeeded in getting an earmark was cut 20$ by the conference
committee. It was only because we had obtained language sufficient
for more than six busses (oz $1.2 million), that the final result
was enough for the six busses originally sought.
Last year, we represented Avon for a retainer amount of $45,000
paid in equal monthly installments. Normally, when. we have
successfully represented a client for a reduced fee, we ~:nticipate
an increase in the fee if we are retained again. Hc=:ever, we
understand that your resources are limited. Zn recognition of that
fact, we propose to represent you for t:~e same terms as 1992.
Specifically, we will seek six busses t~`~e same number sought in
1992 for a retainer amount of $45,000 the same amount paid in
1992. Z hope that you will agree with us that this is a fair
compromise that recognizes your need to maximize the use of your
resources with this firm's need to be adequately compensated for
succeeding on your behalf.
our scope of work, then, will be to pursue appropriations language
in the House and the Senate which earmarks Depa.tment of
Transportation UMTA funds for the acquisition of six fusses for
Avon and Eagle County in FY '93. We anticipate beginning our
efforts as soon as you authorize. We will represent the town
through the end of the Congressional session.
As we discussed last year, we can provide no absolute guarantee of
success. No f irm can. However, we continue to have a perfect
record of success in transportation mattes, as well as for groups
Mr. Bill James
Page Two
and localities in Eagle County, and our effort in 1992 was simply
a continuation of that unblemished record. While it is possible
that this record may at some time be broken, we have no reason to
anticipate it occurring this year.
We appreciate having the opportunity to work with you again this
year, and we hope to receive your authorization to proceed at your
earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
SHARON EDWARDS
LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR
r
Town of Avon P.O. Box 1726 Avon, Colorado 81620 (303) 949-6121 . , . ~ ~ , , . ~ ,
Avon Beaver Creek Transit
Thursday, February 11, 1993
• The Town of Avon has managed and operated the regional bus system since
November, 1990.
• In the past 5 years ridership has increased over 50%
• 1992 was the first year the system carried more than 1~00~0~00~0~00 passengers.
• Last month, January, 1993, we carried 1/4 million passengers. That's more
than a 20% increase over January, 1992.
• This year, we have established 13 ticket outlets from Edwards to East Vail to
Leadville.
• Currently more than 30 lodges and businesses distribute bus maps and
schedules.
• KSKI Radio and TV-8 offer free broadcast time to A/BCT throughout the year.
• Marketing efforts include advertising in newspapers and on radio.
i
Opcrnl.°d by the Town of Avon Trnnsporlfl6ion Division
4
_ r -
t
jur~-~ ri+~i~ it
Avon /Beaver Creek Trans+t
949-61 ~1 TDD
.
'.One~~~Iez)r;- $4:03
>IDiscauc~t'7icket:.sa~ktets ~:4a tickets:far S3U.fl0 ,
hh~.r ~tY~:fbss 5~ti~1<i~rs ; $30.00°~ _
1) Arrowi-Eead Ski Mountain -Edwards
Avon/Beaver Creek Transit -Avon Center -Avon
3) Eagle River Village Trai4er Park -Edwards
4) East Vaii tvlarket -Vail
5) Food Town` - I.eadvilie
r 6) Hi-Ho Parlor - Mintum _
7) KSKI Radio C)ffices -Eagle-Vail
°I 8) Sun River Condominiums -Eagle-Vail
9) Vail Transportation Center -Vail
~ 10) Village Stare -Beaver Creek
.~0 4
VNIL
p.~/QN (8
C7o)
BEI?.vER G
CREEK g
?
` 1I
o \ ~l
a' "Food Town in Leadvill~ provides only te8dville to Awn T1CkR booklct_s.
o~o
Avon /Beaver Creek Trenstt is menogsd ant! operotcd ~ Na
T4wn o~
,I f !
Z# C _ 1 ] Wd8I : Z0 £6-1 I -'GC.+ G4~75b5£0c 1N I lid >i~ I f1C~ NO(td
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Environmental Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
DATE: February 8, 1993
SUBJECT: A request for a major amendment to Cascade Village, SDD #4, Area A,
Millrace III, 1335 Westhaven Drive, Cascade Village, more specifically
described as follows:
A part of the SW 46, NE ~,6, Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 81 West of the 6th P.iN., descn'bed as folbws:
Beginning at a point of the North-South oenterline of said Section 12 whence an 'trop pin with a plutic cap marking the cents of
said Section 12 bears S00°38'56"W 455.06 feet; thence along said centerline N00°38'56"E 122.81 fee to the southerly ROW lice of
I-70; thence departing said ROW line N66°53'25"E 39.15 feet thence deputing said ROW line S81°23'19"E 165.42 feet to a point
of ctwe; thcece 122.83 feet along the arc of a 143.20 foot radius crave to the klt, having a central angle o[ 49°08'51" and a chord
thu bears S15°57'45"E 119.10 feet thence S40°32'10"E 3.00 feet; thence 66.30 feet abng the arc of a 77.21 foot radius tauve to the
right, having a central angle of 49°12'10" and a chord that bears S15°56'05"E 64.28 teed thence S8°40'00"W 90.27 [set; thence
N38°42'24"W 224.55 fcet; thcece S78°10'32"W 101.44 feet to tl~e Point of Beginning.
Applicant: Michael Lauterbach
Planner: Jim Curnutte
,:r: .f:,,,.:.,,:,:,:,::..,,~,,.:..
.,,>,3
:,v`,'r{,inv,•:'i,::t• :r:.~ ...{ii:Yi.:?•ii :^i:•~itii::{:{,•:::~:i?:i:•
v'-i}}ii'•:::.~:::.
a:::::::. :.•:.ir::i::.::::i.::::::: ~ •i ~ rrrrr v ~ ~r v s lr~rr v ~
r:n' e......_ {.r.rr. r x:.-. x::
x:::::.v:: in..
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST
The applicant is seeking approval of a major amendment to Cascade Village, SDD No. #4,
Area A, Millrace III, in order to construct one duplex and one single family residence on the
.819 acre (35,676 sq. ft.) Millrace III site. Each unit is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in size and
will have atwo-car garage and a gas fireplace. The buildings will have a maximum building
height of approximately 35 feet and a total site coverage of 3,907 sq. ft. Since this property
is currently unplatted, the applicant must also receive approval of a minor subdivision prior to
the issuance of any building permits related to this project. Following the construction of the
residences, the applicant will file single family and duplex subdivision plats.
The Millrace III property is bounded by Westhaven Drive on the East, the South Frontage
Road right-of--way and the Westhaven Apartment property (the ruins) on the north, Gore
Creek on the south, and the Cascade Club tennis court property on the west. The y,ryrerty is
currently vacant with the exception of two paved parking areas, one unpaved parking azea and
the paved recreation path. The former owner of this property has allowed the Milkace
Condominiums to maintain and use this property for parking for a number of years.
1
However, the Association does not have any legal right to use this ~~.,~.erty. It appears the
Millrace III property has been zoned SDD since the time it was annexed into the Town of
Vail in 1974. Access to this property will be from Westhaven Drive, which runs along the
eastern y,~,~.erty line.
II. BACKGROUND
In March of 1980, a development plan per the SDD was approved for this property by the
DRB. Under the ayY,~ved plan, devel.,y,,.ent was to occur in a single triulex building. The
total GRFA for the building was calculated at 5,660 sq. ft., according to the definition in
effect at the dme. This figure equates to 6,355 sq. ft. of GRFA if calculated using today's
definition. The maximum height of this building was 36 feet and the total site coverage was
approximately 3,800 sq. ft. Approval of this plan has since expired.
In May of 1992, the applicant requested a work session with the PEC in order to receive
feedback on his conceptual plan to place three single family dwellings on the property. Each
of these units was approximately 2,000 square feet in size with a combined site coverage of
approximately 3,800 square feet. Two of the units were proposed to be three levels high with
the last unit being limited to two levels.
At a PEC worksession. on December 7, 1992, Mr. Lauterbach presented a new scenario for
developing the property. The conceptual site plan showed a duplex building near the southern
end of the site and a single family residence at the northern portion of the site. Each of these
units was proposed to be approximately 2,225 sq. ft. in size and the combined site coverage
of the project was 5,570 sq. ft. The purpose of the December 7, 1992, worksession was to
receive direction from the PEC regarding a number of development parameters. The PEC
agreed that the single family/duplex approach would be acceptable as long as the building
sizes could be consolidated to reduce site coverage and overall lot disturbance. The Planning
Commission agreed not to count overlapping stairs as GRFA in the new devel„Y.,,ent
scenario. Another item discussed by the PEC had to do with setback requirements from
Westhaven Drive and the recreation path. The PEC felt that a minimum setback of 8 ft.
would be desirable along Westhaven Drive with a 12 ft. setback from the recreation path.
The Planning Commission discussed abandonment of the existing recreation path easement
which does not line up with the actual location of the path. The Commission agreed to
abandonment of the easement provided that a new 15 ft. wide easement be platted directly
over the existing recreation path at the time of minor subdivision. The final comments from
the Planning Commission at the December 7, 1992 meeting had to do with minimum distance
between buildings and the proposed building locations. The Planning Commission felt that
the two buildings could be as close as 12 ft. between building foundations, however the PEC
requested that the locations of the single family residence and the duplex be switched so that
the duplex is located on the north side of the lot.
At the January 25, 1993 PEC worksession, Mr. Lauterbach presented his new scheme for the
2
L
property which took into account many of the comments made by the PEC at their December
7, 1992 meeting. The plans submitted at this worksession were much more detailed than had
been previously provided (i.e. scaled floor plans, elevation drawings, landscape plan, etc.).
Upon review of these new detailed plans, the staff and the PEC suggested additional revisions
that the applicant should make prior to requesting final SDD Amendment approval. These
revisions involved the reduction of GRFA, site coverage and building heights from those
shown on the plans, preservation of the Gore Creek riparian zone, architectural changes to the
buildings, and Westhaven Drive improvements. With regard to protecdng the Gore Creek
riparian zone the PEC agreed to allow Mr. Lauterbach to move his buildings closer the front
property line than the previously imposed 8 ft. setback limit. The PEC felt that the building
setback reduction would be acceptable in light of the distance between the front property line
and the edge of the Westhaven Drive pavement. The PEC felt that the trade off between
having the buildings so close to the road and protecting the Gore Creek natural area was
acceptable.
The applicant has addressed each of the recommendations raised at the January 25, 1993
meeting and now wishes to be considered for final SDD Amendment approval.
III. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
Each of the development parameters have been compared with the previous approval (1980
triplex) and the plan being proposed today.
Section 18.46.050 -Permitted Uses
Allowed:
The applicable uses permitted in Cascade Village at this location include
single family dwellings, two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings.
Previous Approval:
One triplex building
Proposed:
One duplex and one single family residence.
Section 18.46.103 -Development Statistics for Area A (Millrace III)
Allowed:
Three dwelling units, 6,000 sq. ft. GRFA, six on-site pazking spaces.
Previous Approval:
Three dwelling units (triplex) 5,660 sq. ft. of GRFA (calculated according to
the definition in place in 1980), 6,355 sq. ft. of GRFA (calculated according to
today's definition), 6,063 sq. ft. (calculated according to today's definition, not
including overlapping stairs), and three on-site enclosed parking spaces.
Proposed:
Three dwelling units, (1 duplex and 1 single family) 6,422 sq. ft. of GRFA
3
J
(calculated according to today's definition), 5,972 sq. ft. (not including
overlapping stairs), and six on-site enclosed parking spaces.
Section 18.46.120 -Setbacks
Required:
The minimum required setback on the nerinherv of all of Area A shall be not
less than 20 feet 50 foot stream setback from Gore Creek .
Previous Approval:
In 1980 when the triplex building was arr.~ved both the recreation path and
the northern property line did not exist. The building was setback 15 ft. fig...
the front property line and 30 R. from the centerline of Gore Creek.
Proposed:
The proposed plan shows that the duplex building is setback 15 ft. fig,,.. the
north property line (adjacent to the ruins), 12 ft. from the recreation path, 53 ft.
from the centerline of Gore Creek and 3 ft. from the front property line
adjacent to Westhaven Drive.
Section 18.46.140 -Height
Allowed: 48 feet
Previous Approval: 36 feet
Proposed: 31 feet (duplex) and 36 feet (single family)
Section 18.46.160 -Site Coverage
Allowed: 35% (12,486 sq. ft.) .
Previous Approval: 10.7% (3,800 sq. ft.)
Proposed: 10.9% (3,907 sq. ft.)
Section 18.46.170 -Landscaping
Allowed: 50% (17,838 sq. ft. minimum)
Previous Approval: 82% (29,200 sq. ft.)
Proposed: 82% (29,400 sq. ft.)
Section 18.46.180 -Parking and Loading
Required:
75% of all required parking shall be located within the main building or
buildings, and hidden from public view fi.,,,~ adjoining r,~rerties within a
landscape berm.
Previous Approval:
50% of all required (2 spaces per unit) were located within the main building.
4
Proposed:
85% of all required parking spaces are located within the buildings. Each unit
has atwo-car garage.
Section 18.46.190 -Recreation Amenities, Tax Assessed
Required: 25 cents per square foot of GRFA must be paid in conjunction
with construction but prior to the issuance of building permits.
Section 18.46.280 -Conservation and Pollution Controls
Required: Protective measures must be used to prevent soil erosion into
Gore Creek, both during and after construction.
IV. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CRl i t:RIA
The criteria to be used to evaluate this proposal are the nine Special Development District
(SDD) development standards set forth in the special devel.,~,..,ent district chapter of the
Zoning Code. The criteria are as follows:
A. Design compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate environment,
neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design,
scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, identity, character, visual
integrity and orientation.
The applicant has made several revisions to his original building design and
site planning in order to respond to previous PEC worksession comments.
These revisions have resulted in a better utilization of the flat~buildable area on
the north side of the lot, a reduction in building height from 43 ft. to 36 ft., a
change in the type of roof form from gable to hip, a reduction in GRFA and
site coverage, and an increase in the amount of landscaped area on the lot and
reduced impacts to the Gore Creek riparian zone.
Staff feels that the architectural design, scale, bulls, building height, buffer
zones, identity, character, visual integrity and orientation of the r.~,rosed
development have been designed compatibly and sensitively to the immediate
environment, neighborhood and adjacent Y~.,~,erties. We would, however,
recommend certain, minor revisions to the buildings' architecture and the
proposed site planning which we feel would improve the overall development
plan. Staff has visited the site to review the r..,~.osed staking of the building
locations and suggests that the southern half of the single family dwelling unit
be shifted 5 ft. toward the Creek and the entire building shifted north
approximately 5 ft. We believe that this minor building location change will
5
improve the appearance of the project as viewed from Westhaven Drive.
Staff's concern is that the present location of the building may present a
significant unbroken plane along Westhaven Drive and this may be reduced
with the building shift.
Staff would suggest that the visual appearance of the north side of the single
family dwelling would be imr~., red with the addition of windows and by
carrying the stone wall all the way to the end of the building.
Staff would suggest that the applicant consider revisions to the west elevation
of the duplex building to lessen the mirror image currently exhibited 'on this
side of the building.
Staff has observed certain minor dis.,,.,rancies between the site plan, landscape
plan and floor plan drawings. None of these discrepancies are significant
enough to recommend tabling of the application at this time. However, staff
would like to see revisions made to the plans to remove these minor
discrepancies as soon as possible. An example of the differences are as
follows:
The deck on the west side of the southern duplex unit is not shown on
the site plan.
The covered entryways for both of the duplex units differs from that
drawn on the floor plans.
The floor plans do not reflect the large deck located on the west side of
the north duplex unit.
The building heights shown on the site plan do not match those
exhibited on the elevation drawings.
The driveway width to the southern duplex unit must be revised to be a
minimum of 12 ft. wide.
The landscape plan does not reflect the new driveway location being
proposed for the north duplex unit. The applicant has stated that a new
landscape plan will be revised after the Planning Commission meeting
in order to incorporate all of the recommended changes the PEC may
have. Some of the differences are due to the fact that the applicant has
tried to respond quickly to staff comments.
6
B. Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and
workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity.
The uses, activity and density being Y~~,~,osed with this development plan
appear to be compatible with surrounding uses and activities. The location and
use of the existing bike path will be unaffected as a result of approval of this
plan. As mentioned previously, some residents of the Millrace Condominium
Association use a portion of this property for parking. The condominium
owners are aware that they do not have any legal right to continue using this
property for parking purposes. The applicant is not Y.~.,~t,osing any uses,
activities or densities different from that originally ar~t,~., red as a part of the
overall Area A development plan for Cascade Village, SDD No. 4. The staff
has not asked for employee housing because we believe the site is too
constrained to provide for more development. This SDD is also providing
housing in more appropriate locations within the SDD, i.e. - Westhaven,
Waterford, Cornerstone, and Glen Lyon. We are looking at the entire SDD in
respect to this issue.
C. Compliance with parking and loading requirements as outlined in Chapter
18.52.
Under Section 18.52 of the Vail Municipal Code, each dwelling unit with less
than 2,000 sq. ft. of GRFA has a parking requirement of 2 spaces and those
with over 2,000 sq. ft. of GRFA would require 2.5 spaces per unit. Two of the
three units (the single family and the north half of the duplex) within the
Millrace III project are under 2,000 sq. ft. of GRFA and therefore require 2
parking spaces to be provided on-site. The parking requirement for the third
unit is 3 parking spaces, as its total GRFA is over the 2,000 sq. ft. threshold.
The proposed plan meets this requirement by providing attached two-car
garages with each unit, plus room for several more cars in front of each garage
door.
D. Conformity with applicable elements of the Vail Comprehensive Plan,
Town policies and Urban Design Plans.
The applicable goals and objectives from the Town's Land Use Plan for this
area include:
1.1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled en~u.,..ment, maintaining a
balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve
both the visitor and the permanent resident.
1.2 The quality of the environment .including air, water and other natural
7
r
resources should be r.~,~ected as the Town grows.
1.3 The quality of development should be maintained and upgraded
whenever possible.
1.12 Vail should accommodate most of the additional growth in existing
developed areas (in fill areas).
1.13 Vail recognizes its stream tract as being a desirable land feature as well
as its potential for public use.
5.1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in
existing, platted areas and as ayY..,r~~ate in new areas where high
hazards do not exist.
E. Identification and mitigation of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect
the property on which the special development district is proposed.
There are no natural and/or geologic hazards affecting this property which
would require mitigation or restrict its development. The proposed buildings
do not encroach into the 100 year flood plain or the 50 ft. Gore Creek setback,
with the exception of a 1 ft. deck encroachment which is allowed pursuant to
Section 18.58.060 of the Vail Municipal Code.
F. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed
to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural
features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community.
Staff believes that the proposed site design, building design, and location and
open space provisions do provide a functional development, responsible and
sensitive to the natural features, vegetation and overall set equality of the
community. As mentioned previously, however, we do have some concerns
with regard to lessening the overall construction impacts. within the Gore Creek
riparian zone and offer specific recommendations at the end of this
memorandum.
G. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing
on and off-site traffic circulation.
The on-site circulation system being proposed in conjunction with this
development plan is accomplished by way of three separate driveways
accessing the three dwelling units fi.,,.. Westhaven Drive. This plan has been
reviewed by the Town Engineer and found to be acceptable. As mentioned
previously, the recreation path location and use will be unaffected as a result of
8
i
p
approval of this devel~ylllent plan. There are some concerns with regard to
off-site circulation which have not been resolved at this time. Currently,
Westhaven Drive, from the South Frontage Road to Gore Creek Bridge, is not
a publicly dedicated and maintained road. The road is owned by MECM
Ent:,~Y~:ses, Inc. and does not currently meet Town standards with regazd to
grade, construction or minimum clearance beneath the pedestrian bridge
connecting the Cascade Club to the building to the south and other standazds.
The Town is interested in working with Mr. Lauterbach as well as the
developers of the Cornerstone and Waterford projects (developments being
proposed at the upper end of Westhaven Drive) and other owners within the
SDD to bring the road up to Town standards and have it dedicated to the Town
for maintenance purposes. Staff does not feel that it would be equitable to
require Mr. Lauterbach to complete all of the road improvements necessary to
bring Westhaven Drive up to standard. Instead, we feel that Mr. Lauterbach
should only be required to bring that portion of the road directly in front of his
property up to Town standazds. The applicant has agreed to complete this
work prior to the issuance of a TCO for the project.
H. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize
and preserve natural features, recreation, views and functions.
A significant portion of this site has been previously disturbed as a result of the
construction of the paved pazking azeas, paved bike path and installation of a
buried gas line. The applicant has attempted to locate the buildings as close to
Westhaven Drive as possible in order to optimize the most buildable azea of
the site and preserve the remaining natural features, such as the heavily treed
Gore Creek riparian zone. The proposed building placement, within 1-1/2 ft. of
the front property line, makes the proposed landscape plan an especially
important element of the overall development plan. The applicant has
attempted to provide significant landscaping in the right-of--way in front of the
proposed dwelling units while at the same time maintaining the Town's
minimum site distance requirements.
In addition to providing a building setback of 12 ft. 11V111 the existing recreation
path, the applicant will be berming and heavily landscaping an area south of
the path to help buffer future residents 1~V111 path users, and vice versa.. The
applicant will be replatting the recreation path easement to conform with the
existing location of the recreation path and will dedicate that easement to the
public. Although the applicant has made several revisions to his plans in order
to lessen the overall impact to the Gore Creek riparian zone, the current plan
still calls for the removal of a significant number of trees and'site disturbance
that will impact the creek vegetation on the west side of the r.,.rerty. Staff
believes that the applicant's proposed landscape plan goes along way towazd
mitigating the impacts of his development plan, however, we would
9
r
recommend that additional landscape materials be added to the y.~~,erty.
Specifically, staff would recommend additional trees and shrubs be provided
along the north side of the recreation path.
Although the Town owns most of the tracts of land immediately adjacent to
Gore Creek throughout the Town of Vail, the river .corridor through the
Cascade Village SDD is in private ownership. Staff recommends that a
fishermen's access easement be ~ Tided arr~~.,~.imately 10 ft -from the high
water mark along the entire length of Gore Creek through this rl rem'.
In order to protect the Gore Creek riparian zone as much as possible, and as
specified in Section 18.46.28 (Conservation and Pollution Controls) of
Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, Cascade Village, staff recommends that
significant protective measures be used to prevent unnecessary damage and
destruction of vegetation and to prevent soil erosion into Gore Creek, both
during and after construction. We would recommend that the plan be amended
to designate an allowable limit of construction activity and require that certain
physical barriers be in place on the ground prior to the issuance of a building
permit. It appears that the 50 ft. setback line would make a logical limit of
construction activity, with the exception of the southwest corner of the r..~~,erty
adjacent to the single family, where construction may be allowed to encroach
10 ft. into the 50 ft. setback line.
The development plan shows a significant distance, approximately 40 ft.,
between building foundations in order to provide a view corridor to the river
area through this development. Staff supports the idea of providing a break in
the line of buildings so that views of the Gore Creek natural area remain open.
I. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional
and efficient relationship throughout the development of the special
development district.
It is the applicant's intention to construct these units at the same time in the
Spring of 1993, therefore, no phasing plan has been submitted for staff review.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends approval of the proposed Millrace III major amendment
to SDD No. 4. The staff finds that the proposal meets the SDD criteria as well
as the goals and objectives of the Town. As mentioned previously in this
memorandum, there are still a number of concerns which staff feels should be
addressed and the applicant has agreed to each of these concerns:
10
I
R 1. The site plan shall be amended to show a designated limit of
construction activity line. This line should follow the 50 ft. setback line
with the exception of the area behind the single family residence. The
purpose of this line is to ensure that construction activity be limited to
the area east of the line. A physical barrier along the limit of
construction activity line shall be in place prior to the issuance of a
building permit for the project. Staff will then make periodic
inspections to the property throughout the construction to assure that no
disturbance occurs west of the construction barrier. The barrier should
be of a design which not only delineates the limit of construction
activity, but also provides for the control of sedimentation into Gore
Creek. This barrier may be accomplished through a combination of
snow fencing, hay bales and fine mesh netting.
2. A 10 ft. pedestrian/fishermen's access easement shall be rt„ ~rided along
the shore of Gore Creek. This easement should extend approximately
10 ft. from the high water mark of the creek to allow fishermen access
up and down Gore Creek. This easement will be dedicated at the time
the minor subdivision is approved.
3. Additional landscaping shall be provided on the north side of the
existing recreation path. This vegetation in addition to that shown on
the landscape plan will help mitigate for the losses being proposed as a
result of the construction of the two buildings. At a minimum, 10
aspen or ash trees (3" cal. minimum) shall be provided along the path
along with 10 - 20 evergreen and deciduous shrubs.
4. Since this property is currently unplatted, a minor subdivision plat must
be submitted, reviewed and approved by the Town prior to the issuance
of a building permit for the project.
5. The applicant agrees to provide the necessary improvements to that
portion of Westhaven Drive directly in front of his property line to
bring the road up to Town standards. These improvements may include,
but are not limited to, curb and gutter, drainage, and a new lift of
asphalt paving.
6. Certain minor modifications shall be made to the site plan, landscape
plan and floor plans so that features shown on any one of the three are
accurately reflected on all plans per the staff memo on page 6. These
changes shall be made before the project proceeds to first reading by
the Town Council.
11
i
7. The southern half of the single family residence shall ~ shifted 3 -5 ft.
away f~.,~~, the road and that the entire building be shifted
approximately 5 ft. further to the north.
12
~v~
~A~ ,
February 10, 1993
Mr. Todd Oppenheimer
Park Superintendent/Landscape Architect
Town of Vail
75 South Frontage Road
Vail, Colorado 81657
Dear Todd:
Thank you for sending "Trees and Shrubs of the Vail Valley"
produced by the Town of Vail. I am very impressed with this
publication as a public service of Vail Park and Landscaping
Division. It presents a lot of good information for
landscapers and home gardeners.
I am glad that we were able to have a part in its production
and hope that we can cooperate with you in further projects
for the Town of Vail.
Sincerely,
Helen S. Fritch
President of the Board
HSF:dyb /
~ 'l~/GC .-~-x
cc: Mayor Peggy Osterfoss ~~'yy;!'~ l
U"
1
~ ~ C~hu/wu.~-
„ ; ~ 1 2 193 ~
Colorado Public Radio
2249 South Josephine Street
Denver, Colorado 802]0
303.571.9191
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO IN VAIL PLANNING GROUP MEETING: THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY I8, 4pm, VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION
AGENDA:
1. Meeting the Wertheim Foundation $40,000 challenge
°Scope of the fundraising effort;
°February 26th corporate breakfast: design and planning
group support;
°Individual giving: review of past supporters; ideas for
new contacts; planning for major donor asking.
2. Vail membership response to date.
3. Cable carriage of Colorado Public Radio in Vail: how to
facilitate.
4. Review of the Colorado Public Radio network concept.
5. Additional planning group meetings.
KCFR 90.1 ~M Denver, KPRN 89.5 FM Grind Junction
\::i 1. Rio Blanco, t1"ilsun Creek. Rangrh~, \irrl.rr, Rifle, Ou: a~~, Pa. achutc ~ ~.~;~i Gait, Sikrnun. Afonr.~osr
XE=
RE~~IV~D ~E8 1 2 193
February 8, 1992
To: Eagle Valley Community Forum Membership
In response to comments made at the November EVCF board of directors meeting, the executive
committee has revised our proposed bylaws. Please take a moment to read these over and vote
to approve or reject the proposal by using the enclosed postcard. We need these cards returned
as soon as possible so that we may elect a 1993 board and officers, and also for our 501(c)(3)
application. Please remember that bylaws can be changed when needed as our organization
evolves.
Major changes in this latest revision include:
1) The number of directors shall not exceed 21.
2) Directors shall be as geographically representative as possible of the valley
communities, with less than 51% residing within the Town of Vail.
3) The executive committee shall consist of four officers elected by the board of
directors and three directors at large, appointed by the president, and shall meet monthly or
as necessary to manage the Forum's operations.
4) The board of directors shall meet at least two times per year.
While the ongoing management of EVCF will be handled by the executive committee, we expect
an increase of activity within the task forces and special committees. Hopefully every board
member will serve on a committee to channel energy into the issues that most interest him or
her.
Please return the enclosed postcard to let us know your feelings on the proposed bylaws and
to advise us of your continued interest in EVCF. Thanks for your help and cooperation.
c~
PS: Task Force Update:
Planning and Development recently began a series of activity with Eagle County to
provide public input on the county's master plan update process. EVCF hosted two
successful public meetings on January 13 and 14, and will continue to work with the
county on a written survey and visioning workshops later this spring.
The Eagle River Task Force was recently approached by Lane Wyatt of NW COG. They
are seeking representation from each of the major Colorado River drainages on water
quality and quantity issues, and asked EVCF to consider being such a group. This
promises to be an active task force over the next year and could possibly receive
funding from outside sources. Please make a note on your card if you're interested in
being contacted for more information.
4
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FORUM
Proposed By-Laws -February 1993
Article I
A. The name of this organization shall be Eagle Valley Community Forum (EVCF).
B. Primary records and files shall be physically located at S00 E. Lionshead Circle, Suite
301, Vail, Colorado 81657. The EVCF mailing address is: P. O. Box 2816, Avon CO 81620.
These addresses may be changed at the discretion of the executive committee.
Article II -Mission Statea2eat
The mission of the EVCF is: 1) To develop a vision for our future which preserves and
enhances our quality of life; 2) To provide an open valley-wide forum for the discussion of .
community issues and to establish community consensus as to priorities and realistic solutions;
3) To bring together the necessary resources to implement solutions.
Article III -Membership
EVCF shall have formal membership open to all interested individuals with dues as established
by the Board of Directors. The fee will be waived in case of financial hardship, with executive
committee approval, if members remain active participants of the organization.
Article IV -Board of Directors
A. General Powers and Duties
The business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by its Board of Directors.
Board members shall attend regularly scheduled as well as special board meetings when given
notification by telephone, facsimile or mail at least ten days in advance, or shall notify the
president or president's designee if unable to attend. Board members shall stay updated
regarding EVCF activities, and serve on a task force or standing committee.
B. Number and Tenure
The number of directors shall not exceed 21. Directors shall include the officers of
EVCF and shall be as geographically representative as possible of the valley communities, with
less than 51°~ residing within the Town of Vail. Directors shall be elected by a vote of the
current membership for a two year, staggered term. Individuals may serve more than one term.
C. Executive Committee
An executive committee consisting of all officers, as elected by the board of directors,
and three directors at large, appointed by the president, shall meet monthly or as necessary to
manage EVCF operations.
D. Officers and Duties
1) President. The president shall preside at all board meetings; ensure [hat bylaws,
policies and relevant governmental regulations are followed; supervise the activities of EVCF
including the work of other board members, task forces, committees and employees; and be
available to execute necessary documents.
2) Vice President. The vice president shall take on the duties of the president in
the case of her or his absence, death, or inability to act.
3) Secretary. The secretary shall be responsible for keeping minutes, records and
proceedings of meetings of the board of directors, executive committee meetings and the
annual membership meetings.
4) Treasurer. The treasurer shall oversee the fiduciary activity of EVCF, including
deposits and payments on accounts, tax and financial reporting, payroll and general
bookkeeping.
E. Election of Officers
A nominating committee consisting of at least three board members shall be appointed
by the president annually. The nominating committee shall approach appropriate candidates
and assemble a ballot which shall be mailed to all EVCF members at least 10 days prior to the
annual membership meeting. At that meeting, other individuals expressing a willingness to
serve, either by their presence or in writing, may be nominated for an office. Officers shall
be elected by a majority vote of the board membership for a one year term.
F. Termination of officers and board members.
1) Each director shall notify the president of his or her resignation when necessary,
with resignation considered to be in force immediately.
2) Both officers and board members may be removed from their position in the
event that they: a} do not attend meetings as required, b) are perceived to not actin good faith
in the best interest of EVCF, or c) show a lack of interest and involvement in EVCF activities.
Members and/or officers may be removed at a regular or special meeting by atwo-thirds vote
of the board of directors.
3) Vacancies shall replaced by majority vote at any scheduled board meeting to
serve the remainder of the term.
G. Meetings of the Board
1) Regularly scheduled board meetings shall occur at least two times per year.
2) A special board meeting may be called by the president or any two board
members by notifying all members by telephone, facsimile or mail at least seven days. in
advance.
3) Meetings shall normally be scheduled during early evening hours at a location
within Eagle County, Colorado, to be named by the individual(s) calling the meeting.
H. Voting
1) At board and executive committee meetings, all board members present shall
have one vote. A quorum consisting of at least Sl~c of the full board is necessary for voting
at any board meeting. An election or issue shall be carried by majority vote of those present.
t 2) At the annual meeting, directors shall be chosen by majority vote of members
present.
I. Task Forces and Committees
The executive committee shall establish committees and task forces as necessary to carry
out the mission of EVCF. Each such committee or task force shall have at least one member
of the board of directors; other members shall be recruited from the Eagle Valley community
at large.
.1. Compensation
No officers or members of the board of directors shall be financially compensated for
their duties.
Article V -Fiscal Responsibility
A. The fiscal year shall be January ist through December 31st.
B. The executive committee shall review all financial transactions at least quarterly. A
financial statement shall be made available to all board members at each regularly scheduled
board meetin¢.
C. Any audit performed must be done by an accounting firm approved by a majority vote
of the board.
Article VI -Staff
A. Any employees, consultants or project managers shall be hired or fired as determined
by the EVCF executive committee.
B. Duties and responsibilities of all staff shall be outlined by a job description designed
by the executive committee or a designated personnel committee.
C. The treasurer is responsible for overseeing all payroll, tax filings and returns for EVCF.
D. All staf f positions are supervised by the President or a person of her or his appointment.
Article VII -Amendment of Bylaws
These bylaws may be amended at any scheduled board meeting by a majority vote
provided the proposed amendment is sent in written form to all board members 10 days in
advance, and a proxy vote offered to all board members not present. Bylaws may be amended
without prior notice at any meeting at which 51°b of the full board of directors votes in support
of the amendment(s).
Article VIII -Dissolution
In the event of dissolution, abandonment or termination of Eagle Valley Community
Forum, no income, contribution, nor other revenue shall inure to the benefit of any affiliated
individual or group. The board shall first clear all debts and liabilities of EVCF. Remaining
funds shall be returned to governments and grantors in proportion to their original
contribution, should the board of directors consider EVCF's obligations to those entities
unfulfilled. All remaining assets shall be donated to any qualified 501(c)(3) organization(s)
chosen by a majority vote of the board of directors.
Approved by the Board of Directors of Eagle Valley Community Forum on
Sherry Dorward, President Date
i
}
~ ? .
f~
I hereby vote to (approve ~ (reject EVCF bylaws as proposed, February 1993 draft. ~ -
If voting to reject, please comment:
Do you wish to continue your involvement as an EVCF board member? (yes (no ~
Is there anyone currently not involved whom you would recommend as a likely board
candidate? Name, telephone:
Which special issue or activity would you like to pursue?
i What evenings are best for you to meet? ,
Signature ,Date
Please sign and return this card by February 15. Thank you!
- - . ~.,..~....w... .w~.~
_ ....,:..:,_,.r.~....,_......,.,._...
ti
Eagle Valley Community Forum ~
P.O. Box 2816
Avon, CO 81620
Eagle Valley Community Forum
P.O. Box 2816
Avon, CO 81620
¦ ¦
_
V ~ ~ Exploring Today's Realities
i
l
February 18, 1993
x
r:RAIG COGUT
General Partner of Apollo Advisors
And
ANDY DALY
President of Vail Associates
"Parallel Turns: Apollo's New Business Venture With Vail Associates"
The Westin Resort, Vail
Breakfast at 7:30 A.M.
Program ar 8:00 A.M.
Cost is $15 per person
Reservations necessary: Call 476-0954
The Symposium Breakfast Series
is organized for and open to the public
° ° o a
o
a
a
na I993 ~ -
4
O
L
A
A
O .
4
4 A
O
i i j3
g R 4 0 G
VAIL & BEAVER CREEK
AMERICAN 29 January, 1993
SKI CLASSIC DATE:
TO List
Presented by RE : Hours/Location of Registration for
SUBARU
1993 American Ski Classic
Hosted by Jerry Ford FROM: R1Chard
Rolex Legends of Skiing
Visa Ford Cup
March 10-14, 1993
Dates and times of operation for Registration for
the 1993 American Ski Classic are as follows:
Board of Directors O Tuesday, 9 March, 1993
President Gerald R. Ford NOOn Until 9 : OOPM
Robert E. Barrett
Leon D. Black
Carolyn S. Blount o Wednesday, 10 March, 199 3
Craig M. Cogut ~ ; OOAM unt i 1 9 : 0 OPM
James Berry Craddock
jack Crosby
Andrew P. Daly o Thursday, 11 March, 1993
H. Benjamin Duke, jr. 7 ; OOAM Uritil 9.OOPM
Harry H. Frampton, III '
John Gamsey
George N. Gillett, Jr. O Friday, 12 March, 1993
PepiGramshammer 7:OOAM Until 9:OOPM
Steve N. Haber
Martha Head
William Hybl o Saturday, 13 March, 1993
Elaine W. Kelton ; O OAM Until 7 : O OPM
Henry R. Kravis
Fitzhugh Scott, Emeritus
Michael S. Shannon ' O Sunday, 14 March, 1993
Rodney E. Slifer 7 ; OOAM Until 1: OOPM
C. Philip Smiley
Richard L. Swig
Oscar L.?ang Registration Offices will be located on the
Herbert A. Wertheim Meeting Level of the Beaver Creek Hyatt in Gore
Range Hall. The Gift Bag Room is co-located with
John Gamsey Registration.
President
/ .
vAII,vAI~
FOUNDATION
A Project of the Vail Valley Foundation ,
Post Office Box 309
VailrColorado 81658 '
303.476.9500
FAX 303.476.7320 ® ,8~ Candidate for the 1999 World Alpine Ski Championships
X~: ~ ~
. RECEIVED FEB - . ~p~ ~ ~
United, States Forest k'hite River Holy Cross Ranger Di~ti~i~7t
Department of Service National P.O. Boa 190
`Agriculture Forest Minturn, Colorado 81645
303-827-5715
Reply to: 2430
Date: February 4, 1993
Mr. Don Byers
352 Beaver Dam Circle
Vail, Co. 81657
Dear Mr. Byers:
Thank you for your letter of January 21, 1993, requesting additional
information and clarification of the timber sales program oa the Holy Cross
District.
I apologize for the confusion in your request for the Five-Year Timber Sale
Action Plan. My staff and I are trying very hard to be responsive to your
requests, and I regret it if that causes us to send you unwanted and irrelevant
information. You are certainly entitled to all documents that are public _
information, and I have instructed my staff to be very proactive in meeting
your requests. Please understand that sometimes we have difficulty in
understanding what you are requesting. Please feel free to call me personally
at any time, and in particular please let me know again if you feel we are not
being responsive to your requests.
In regard to the location of the Wearyman Timber Sale, during the initial
planning of a timber sale it is not uncommon to identify the sale in abroad
legal location. As the process continues the actual project area is refined
and the boundaries specifically determined. This is the situation with the
Wearyman Timber Sale. Through the Environmental Analysis process the project
has been defined as the following legal description: T6S, R79W, portions of
Sections 19 and 30, and T6S, R80W, portions of Sections 23, 24, 25, and 26.
The purpose of the legal description is to provide interested parties with a
general location in order for evaluation of their interest in a particular area
of the Forest. The specific location can be obtained by contacting the
District Office if the area is of particular interest to an individual. The
acreage of the project area is estimated to be 2,368 acres. I hope this answers
your question concerning the Wearyman Timber Sale.
U~?S
FS•8200.28(7.92)
~ ~ ~
In regard to the Pearl Creek and Jones Gulch Timber Sales, these projects are
at the initial planning phase which will culminate in the writing of a
"position statement." The Position Statement evaluates the feasibility of the
proposed project and results in a decision on whether to proceed with the
project or not. If the decision is to proceed, the sale is then placed on the
Five-Year Timber Sale Action Plan. The proposed Pearl Creek. and Jones Gulch
Timber Sales may or may not be included in the Five Year Timber Sale Plan
depending on the outcome of this preliminary analysis.
In response to your questions concerning the small sales listed on the Action
Plan, I need to explain what we mean by a "small sale." A small sale is any
sale less than one-million board feet prepared and sold under the authority
delegated to the District Ranger. Sales of more than one million board feet '
are prepared and sold under the authority of the Forest Supervisor, and are
~gtailed on the Five Year Action Plan. As used on the Action Plan, Small Sales
frequently .lump more than one sale together and may include the total volume of
combined sales including personal-use firewood, post and pole sales. ski area
volumes, and small sawlog sales.
During the period 1993 to 1996, the Holy Cross District has listed an estimated
2.6 million board feet in small sales, or an average of 650,000 board feet per
year. Using the figure of 162 board feet per tree, this calculates to 16,049
trees to be included. An average timber sale on the District harvests
approximately 50 to 70 trees per acre. Therefore. using the above figures the
acreage of treatment from small sales would be approximately 268 acres during
the period 1993 to 1996. To put this in perspective, this volume includes
about 500,000 board feet of personal-use firewood from dead trees, and the rest
comes primarily from ski area projects and an occasional separate sawlog or
commercial firewood sale.
To answer your questions on Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PICT), I have obtained
the following information. In Fiscal Year 1992 (October 1, 1991 to September
30, 1992), the Forest Service paid Eagle County $289,846 in PICT payments. The
PICT payment is a fixed figure based on acreage of National Forest System lands
in the county. During the same period the Forest Service paid Eagle County
$373.901.60 from the 25 Percent Payment. This money was generated from all
revenue producing activities on the Holy Cross and Eagle Ranger Districts.
This is distributed by counties and not by Ranger Districts, thus there is no
way to separate this by District. Of the $373,901.60, timber sales accounted
for $57,696.50. Again there is no way to separate this by timber sale since it
is collected by county, however Eagle Ranger District usually sells slightly
more volume than Holy Cross Ranger District. Adding the two types of payments
together, the total Forest Service payment from both Ranger Districts to Eagle
County last year was $663.747.60.
U~?S
Fs•e2oo•2sc~•es~
~ u
r
v
9
As far as the proximity of the Hanks Gulch and Wearya?an Timber Sales, you are
correct that the difference comes from the revised specific location of the
Wearyman Sale. We have tentatively identified units for the Wearyman Sale to
aid in our analysis, and they are roughly three miles from the Hanks Gulch Sale
at the nearest point. In addition to your identification of this issue as part
of our scoping on the sale, the issue of proximity was also discussed at our
public field trip to the sale area. Because this was identified as an issue in
scoping, it will be one of the issues analyzed in the Cumulative Impacts
section of the Environmental Assessment. In any case, both sale areas are
within the 7E (Wood fiber production) Forest Plan management prescription, and
cumulative effects will have to be within all relevant Plan direction,
standards, and guidelines.
You stated that you feel we are not giving people the big picture of our timber
sale program again citing, the issue of proximity. The entire purpose of
scoping as part of an environmental analysis is to identify public issues that
might not otherwise be identified so that all issues can be adequately
considered in the analysis prior to a decision. In our letters and releases
for a proposed project, we will list known issues and invite public comments.
It is rare that we identify all issues without the assistance of the public,
hence the public scoping is vital to thorough environmental analyses. We did
not include the issue of proximity in our early releases, however with your
help the issue was identified and will be addressed and analyzed in the
Environmental Assessment.
I do not recall telling you that someone from my office had a meeting with any
representatives of the Vail Town Planning Commission. I do, however, remember
reporting to you that two members of the Town Council and the Town's
environmental planner participated in our public field trip to the area.
Perhaps I confused you about where our discussions took place. In any case, we
do routinely seek and receive input from the Town of Vail on our management
activities, usually by way of letter. I have conducted field trips for the
mayor and council on other occasions, but have only formally addressed the
Council on one occasion. Recently Forest Supervisor Veto LaSalle and I have
talked to the mayor, manager, and several council members about partipating
with us in an ecosystem management pilot project we hope to conduct in the Red
' Sandstone area in the future. I feel the relationship I have with the Town is
extremely strong and productive. I feel that even though I have had only one
formal presentation to the Council on this topic that I have provided an
adequate level of information to meet the needs of the Town. I am certain the
Town would request formal discussions if they felt the need. I will, however,
notifq you as you requested of any planned public meetings on timber sales with
the Town staff or elected officials.
U~?S
FS•8200.28(7.82)
r
r ~ !
i
You also expressed concern about visual quality. One of our landscape
architects participated in our public field review and has since completed her
report which states that the project will enhance visual diversity by:
Form - Stands will be broken up, but not fragmented to add variety in the
stand
Line - Trees will be selected in a process that will not create unnatural
lines in the canopy from harvest activity
Color - Seasonal variety of color will be enhanced by aspen regeneration
Texture - Species diversity and the unevenage of the stand will create a
more complex texture of the canopy.
Regarding wildlife habitat, the Colora~o Division of Wildlife has been
consulted and involved in the formation of the project as has our own District
Wildlife Biologist. Bill Andree, District Wildlife Manager for the Colorado
Division of Wildlife has commented on the proposed Wearyman Timber Sale.
Bill's comments include Concern with elk solitude, the heavy recreation use of
the area and the impacts on wildlife, and lynx habitat. General concerns
include roads, timing of the sale, the amount of area impacted at one time. and
the size of openings as they relate to wildlfife use. Bill Andree and our
wildlife biologist will continue to have an important role in the designing of
action alternatives and mitigation.
Thank you for your inquiry. I hope this information sufficiently answers your
questions. Please let Dave or me know if you have additional questions.
Sincerely,
e
C~o~~~G~
WILLIAM A. WOOD
District Ranger
cc: Mr. Ron Phillips, Town of Vail Manager _
Mr. Veto LsSalle, Forest Supervisor
F6.8200.28(7-82)
I
TOWN OF UAIL ~
7S Soutb Frontage Road Department of Community Development
Pail, Colorado 81657
303-479-2138 / 479-2139
February 11, 1993
Mr. Michael Claffey
Army Corps of Engineers
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Junction, CO 81501-2563
Ref: Public Notice # 199275078 (Vail Recreation District Par 3 Golf Coursel
Dear Mr. Claffey:
The Vail Town Council and staff have reviewed the Public Notice on the Par 3 Golf Course and look
forward to the completion of the draft environmental assessment. The potential cumulative impacts to
wetlands in the Vail Valley and the potential safety problems are issues that need to be examined in
the environmental assessment. We are also aware that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
has implemented protection plans for the humpback chub, bonytail chub, and razorback sucker, and
we would want to ensure that the withdrawal of 10 acre feet would not be in conflict with USFWS
plans or policies.
The Town and Recreation District have held numerous public meetings on the proposed Par 3 Golf
Course and could provide you with minutes and recordings of these forums. Environmental issue
were often brought up in these discussions. In terms of the environmental issues that were raised,
discussion primarily focused on the loss of wetlands and open area. There has also been extensive
discussion on the need for the course, parking requirements, transportation to the course, safety
issues, and course design. After significant public input, the Vail Town Council approved the Booth
Creek Par 3 Golf Course. Please contact Russell Forrest at 479-2138 if you would like tapes or
minutes from these Town meetings.
Thank you for your cooperation and we look forward to reviewing the draft environmental
assessment.
Sincerely,
Ms. Peggy A. Osterfos~
Mayor of Vail
x.c. Vail Town Council
PEC
Ron Phillips
Rob Robinson
9 February 1993
To: All TOV Employees
From: Steve Barwick & Bob Mach
Subject: Employee Meetings to discuss New Bonus Program and
Total Quality Management
There will be two employee meetings to discuss the implementation
of the New Bonus Program and the status of the development of the
TOV quality improvement effort. We strongly encourage everyone to
attend one of the following sessions in the Town Council Chambers:
1. Monday, 15 February, 3-5 PM.
2. Tuesday, 16 February, 8-10 AM.
Refreshments will be served!!!!
Looking forward to seeing everyone......
Steve & Bob
SPEAK UP Mr r; t tNG
January 27, 1993
12:00
Evergreen Lodge
Mayor Peggy Osterfoss gave opening remarks and outlined the purpose of the Speak Up
series. Peggy explained that the Speak-Up meetings serve as just one avenue of the input
that the Town pursues.
Comments and questions are denoted by l~old/underlined print. Each response is denoted by
standard type.
* What is an update on Dous Bruce's efforts?
(Peggy Doug Bruce's current efforts are focusing on a proposal which would
Osterfoss) make it easier to get measures on the ballot. Acounter-effort is taking
place which would place restrictions on the signatures obtained to put a
measure on the ballot (particularly regarding location where signatures
can be obtained.)
Other elements of Bruce's efforts include tightening of campaign
regulations and a tightening of representative government. There is not
certainty that his current proposal will appear on the ballot.
Other legislative questions include, "Should we change from simple
majority to ?/s support for passage of a measure?" The issue of local
control, "Should local governments be able to decide if they want the
Bruce Amendment in effect?" Many thoughts are being discussed as to
how to increase local government control over local issues.
~ What is an uvdate on the police department's building?
(Peggy The Vail Town Council asked the architects to continue working to reduce
Osterfoss) the extent of the project. The architects had returned to the Council
recently with a $3.4 million proposal (including architects fees). The
architects have since brought the price tag down to $3 million. The
design of this structure is built for what is needed today -with no
accounting for growth. Many residents want to see the plan this way,
believing Vail has reached its growth capacity. Others feel we will
continue to grow from a tourist and year around economy perspective
and that Vail has actually not grown in a permanent resident fashion in
ten years; however, business and service demands have grown
enormously and probably will continue to do so.
The original proposal was for $5.7 million. Money was saved by
elimination of one level of underground parking, and taking a more
"renovation" approach to the current facility. Community space was
eliminated as well.
-1-
* As a citizen, I avvreciate the Council's concern about frivolity, but I am
also concerned about the Council's vlannine for the lone term in the
proiect. It is all in "how" the vroiect is communicated to the vublic -
residents need to understand the "why" of each vrovosal.
* Is the facility beine desiened to expand later as needed?
(Peggy Yes. A limited ability will be there to add on, but not extensively. We
Osterfoss) are trying to deal with toda~s needs in a manner we can afford.
~ We should be learnine a lesson from Eaele County in their new iustice
center. 'They did not build avvrovriately to meet needs and had to eo
back and redo $700,000 of the vroiect.
* Tim Gibson broueht uv the issue of makine the Council more vroactive
and less reactive. What do you feel about this, Peery?
(Peggy I give the current Council credit for trying to look at the big picture and
Osterfoss) the long range vision. Our founding fathers realized this was not just a
beautiful place, but had tremendous economic potential. The Council
works hard to balance these priorities and that's very visionary. Almost
everything the Town Council does feeds that vision (i.e., land trusts and
open space preservation, housing, transit) although some of our issues we
deal with on a regular basis, may seem mundane .
(Jim I don't feel completely comfortable speaking for Jim Gibson, however, the
Shearer) point I believe he was trying to make was that we need to move forward
more quickly and create additional momentum. We are trying to address
possible consolidation of services and privatization. We are trying to
determine what exactly is realistic.
We need to maximize effectiveness in these decisions and work to create
a mandate for such changes and new programs.
Qim The operating word here is for the Council to be more proactive, whether
Shearer) it be implementing campaign promises or balancing public opinion. I
think we can pat ourselves on the back for defining many of the major
issues, we need to just build the momentum to get progress made.
(Peggy Another area we need to move forward with significantly is the
Osterfoss) transportation issues from an environmental and aesthetic, and quality of
experience perspective.
* I don't know what we will do about the gridlock in this community.
What are the answers to this big, exvensive vroblem? It effects life
quality, the economy, and the environment.
-2-
(Dick I've been here 15 years and this holiday season is the tightest I've seen it.
Duran) The Town staff is looking seriously at things we might do to address
traffic flow, etc.
(Diana One question which needs to be answered is where exactly are the cars
Donovan) coming from which are travelling north on Vail Road when there is no
parking available in that direction!
(Peggy What is interesting is the common sense as well as engineering solutions
Osterfoss) to the problems. A tunnel? An alternative route to South Frontage from
the Village? Posting someone at the Village transportation center to direct
traffic east instead of west? Staff giving directions in combination with
excellent signing? If you just ask people, they will give you a number of
different ideas. We are putting the transportation task force back together
to implement some of these, if possible.
(Ron We started asking people to go east the night of the truck accident and
Phillips) many were quite angry. We need to combine education with other
mechanisms.
(Peggy Regarding the decision to make parking free at Ford Park, we need to
Osterfoss) combine efforts to educate people to use the east I-70 exit more, and to
carpool. These are definitely "big picture" issues. We are doing many
things to make the bus system more "user-friendly" locally and
regionally, increasing hours, installing perimeter seating, establishing
new offices, new office hours, and more.
* The Ford Park narking decision is very positive. Have you ever looked
at expanding free narking in the structure to two hours to save on the
"rotating" traffic of those Village employees who move their cars every
90 minutes. We need to do a better iob of distributing information
regarding the bus system.
(Ron The $18,000 revenue loss for parking at Ford Park is just one of the many
Phillips) elements. Once you plug in all the other cost-saving factors, the cost is a
wash.
(Diana Does Vail Associates keev_ neop_ le out of the soccer field lot for a
Donovan) reason?
(Peggy No. That is public parking on a first come, first serve basis. A VA
Osterfoss) employee is supposed to be there to facilitate the parking process. We
will investigate whether people are actually being turned away when
there is space available.
(Diana When can we address the traffic signs and no narking signs. It
Donovan) seems there are so many now, you. don't even see them -and they are
cluttering the environment.
-3-
(Peggy The Town Council has taken the position that we don't want to see any
Osterfoss) more signs than necessary. We have had a problem with guests not
seeing the signs. We will be working on more effective signing in order
to reduce the numbers. This issue is a conflict with enforcement efforts.
We are working to balance enforcement needs with aesthetic needs.
Many have been removed already. However, there is a feeling there are
too may still.
(Rob I find it ironic that we all agree that there should be less signs. However,
Levine) it seems the answer to every problem with communication seems to be
"more and better signs."
(Peggy Some of the things that seem like minor details take a lot of time to solve.
Osterfoss) But these smaller issues all contribute to the bigger picture in Vail.
* Have you ever thought of moving Checkpoint Charlie?
(Larry We will be moving Checkpoint Charlie this year to try and relieve the
Grafel) gridlock and cars entering the Village.
(Ron Part of the problem is that Forest Road is blocked to the west, all the
Phillips) traffic from these areas comes down to Vail Road.
(Peggy We certainly appreciate the suggestions. Your input is an
Osterfoss) important part of the public process.
Peggy Osterfoss thanked everyone for coming, and adjourned the meeting.
-4-
~~r
a~ i~~ f3
- a. N N B 8
~ ~ ~
In Tannin the Children's room at the Vail ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ICJ ~1 CS.I~ ~ Jl ®Jlll
p g
6:30 WelCOme! Public Library, we have created a dream list. We
have visualized an "independent learning center."
Please enjoy yourselves in the The items within the center are specifically to
~ enhance, entice, and accentuate the children's
children s area. Help yourself to a
listening center. Currently, the listening center
story on tape, Explore our puzzles, gives preschool children the opportunity to refocus, 9
legos, our new train set. Settle into sit down, and enjoy stories on tape. We have many ~ ~ °
a good book, sit in our miniature more ideas and dreams for the children's
Ford Amphitheater. independent learning center. Our future dreams
include, a television and video station, an
adaptation for the hearing impaired, and a
7:00 Magic Showl computer station. This is a special place for
preschoolers and early adolescence. The
- Watch the wonders of Arthur Atsma opportunity is endless' FebY'uaPy 17, 1993
The Great Artismo INDEPF,Nnt+;NT LEARNINU CENTER
1. Cabinet ..........................................................................$150.00
7:45 Story Time with Annie
2. Television & Video „
F'CL2YytClles Czi2Cl Fantasy Cassette Recorder ................................................$600.00
TOWN OF VAIL
i_ _ _ 3. Com uter Terminal ...................................................$300
- Listen to tiic ~nagie. Puppets, P YailPublicLibrary
sori S Sto ames. 4. Adaptation fur the Hearing ~
g ~ ~ g _92 W. Meadow Drive
Impalred .......................................................................$?10.00 Vail, Colorado 81657
8:00 Food & Fun. Visit Friends.
OTH>?R FLT
PURE DREAMS ~
1. Book Display Case .........................................$1,000.00
This beautiful glass book case will display ~ 'i
new books, holiday books, special.
program books, etc. Designed to y%'
encourage parents, teachers, children / I I
and teens to "take a look." ~ -
~ t , . ~ 'I;~~~~~
2. Children's books ..............................Individual prices 1'!~~'i~~'i~
3. Pillows for Children and
Teen Areas ................................................................$200.00 ~
4. Puppet Sets ...........................................................$35.00 ea.
5. Big Display Books ..........................................$20.00 ea. y ' Ilil~,,
6. Block Table ..........................................$200.00 = /
In 1990, The Vail Town Council decided that a
Children's Room should be created within the Library.
Several members of the Council wanted more than a ° ~v ~y ~~y j~ ~v
"dividing wall" between the children's area and the adult ~~c~i ~Li Ir\~ ~®~~~i ~~~i~~i ~ ti~t~
area and envisioned a room truly for children. Lori
Haugland, the Children's Librarian at that time, and the
VPL staff began to dream about a space that could be Many Thanks to the following people.
comfortable, colorful, warm and welcoming. It was a space
for the young child, ranging in age from several months to
about 7 years. We saw The Children's Room as filling a
unique place in a very special community, a community
that values its children highly. So began our adventure. Children S Librar2an: Carpentry on Miniatures:
Pam Hopkins, architect for the original library building, Lori Haugland Town of Vail Carpenters
agreed to help us in creating this new area. We wanted a
child-scaled room, not just adult furniture reduced in size. ,IOhn Gallegos
We wanted li ht and endless space. But when the drawings Vail Town Council, .~9~0
g Brian Canepa
were given to the contractors, our project was found to be
over budget. Coming to our rescue, the contractors, Vail Public Library Staff Gilbert Gon.~ales
Sullivan and Woods, agreed to donate the price difference
so we could get started. Lori and Pam discussed asking Artist of Etched Glass Doors:
local architects to design customized miniatures of Primary Architect:
landmark buildings in Vail. After several meetings with Pam Hopkins Don Young Glass Studio
local architects to discuss scale, color, size and
functionality... things began to happen. Drawings of
unique Vail landmarks were created by the architects. Contractor Photographer:
Several benefactors donated funds critical to the Sullivan and Woods Mike Rawlings
implementation of the project. The unique carpentry
talents of the TOV Carpenters turned our vision of Vail
landmarks into child-sized library furniture... and the Bus Stop Miniature: Children:
furniture is a hit! Children love playing in the Covered Karl, Erin, Foster, SaSha, Ben,
Bridge, the Bus Stop and the Amphitheater. DeS2gned by: Kathy
Design and purchase of the etched glass doors was a Langenwalter Bess and Zoie
simultaneous project. We wanted a way to welcome Funded by:
children to an area of imagination and possibility. An Benefactors on First Etched Glass
area that needed no sign. A place that said, "This is a Friends of the Library
Doors:
special place created just for you." Lori saw photographic
etchings on glass. The cost was high, but fortunately Covered Bridge Miniature Dr. Herbert and Nicole
longtime library supporters, Dr. Herbert and Nicole
Wertheim, saw the beauty of the project and encouraged Designed by: Michael Sanner Wertheim Foundation
us to move ahead with the first set of doors. Local
photographer, Mike Rawlings, donated time to get Funded by: Curtis W. McGraw Benefactors on Final Etched Glass
children in just the right poses for the artwork. When the Foundation
first set of doors was completed, the response from the Doors:
community was sheer delight. New benefactors stepped The Robert Hernreich family,
forward to support the purchase of the final set of doors. Gerald Ford Amph2theater
For this we wish to thank: The Robert Hernreich family, the Dean Liotta family and the
the Dean Liotta family and the Erich Windisch family. MZn2atZ[re
Designed by: Morter Architects Erich Windisch family
The library staff and the children in the community
proved enthusiastic and invaluable supporters of the Funded by: David Hokins
Children's Room project. They indicated what they liked
about the Children's Room and what needed to be Foundation
changed. Children and staff believed in the area and saw
it as a place of adventure and possibility. And so, thanks
to the efforts, enthusiasm and unflagging support of so
many, the vision has been translated to realit}~ and the and Of course, the children of our community, who inspired us.
Children of Vail have a room of their own.
WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP February 12, 1993 Page 1 of 2
TOPIC _ QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS
1991
11/19 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES LARRY E.ITIM D./JIM C.: What can be done to make these Locations for the newspaper boxes have been determined and approved
uniform and locations less prolific? by all TOV departments. Staff will talk to Larry E. to determine if
voluntary agreements or an ordinance outlining locations are appropriate.
This has been scheduled for DRT on Wednesday, 2117/93.
SIGNS AT VAIL ROAD & MEADOW LARRY G./MIKE ROSEIGREG: Appropriate sign(s) on Vail "No Through Traffic" sign is currently posted. Problem appears to center
DRIVE Road to preclude right-hand turns onto West Meadow Drive at the 4-Way.
for traffic that does not need to be there, i.e. "right-hand turn
will lead to dead end; dead end on right turn; no authorized
vehicles, etc."
1992
02117 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTANIANDY: Draft Ordinance. Larry E. will further explore the areas of non-conformities, tree lighting and
number of lights, and will attempt to have his before Council at the
2123193 work session.
08125 FOLLOW-UP WITH BUCK SHRADER PEGIPAM/LARRY G.: Mr. Shrader has called to find out Larry Grafel will write to Bob Baker, attaching responses re: two issues,
(CDOT)/JAKE BRAKES/SPEED whether there has been improvement on the maintenance i.e., fake brakes and speed limits. Larry G. will continue to "reason" with
LIMITS ON VAIL PASS for the west side of the bike pathlVail Pass. Although CDOT. Larry G. will write to Bob Baker.
CDOT has stepped up efforts to clean and maintain, their
efforts have not been consistent, and this was
communicated by Pam.
09108 1041 PLAN LARRY E.: Barbara Green has asked whether the Town of Larry E. will further research and perhaps provide alternatives.
(request: Steinberg) Vail has a 1041 Plan.
10/27 ELEVATOR INSPECTION LARRY E./GARY M./KRISTAN/DICK: Tom Steinberg NWCCOG contract received. Staff will review.
PROGRAM brought in a proposed resolution to adopt legislation for the
(request: Steinberg) elevator inspection program.
11!03 UNPLATTED LANDS AS MIKE MOLLICA/JIM CURNUTTE: Have we followed-up Forest Service reviewing LOA work. Jim Curnutte and Mike Mollica have
DONATIONS with contacting owners of parcels that may be given to TOV compiled a list of properties. Letter to Council by 2128193 for review.
(request: Steinberg) as gifts -understanding we are still moving through the LOA
process.
February 12, 1993 Page 2 of 2
11110 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 416/93, from 4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.
12/08 VRD CONTRACT ANALYSIS STEVE B.: Peggy has called Ken Wilson to indicate Under negotiation.
Council cannot begin negotiations until the first of February.
Prepare analysis of contract for Council review.
1993
01!26 SIMONTON GOING-AWAY PARTY EVERYONE: Joint planning is underway to host a farewell February 21,1993, from 5:00 - 7:00 P.M., at Eagle's Nest. The gondola
party for the Simontons in February. Details to follow. will be open to the public. A "house warming" fund is being established.
This is a joint effort between VA, TOV, and various local organizations.
01126 DEVELOPMENT OF PROACTIVE PEGGYICOUNCIL: Discuss whether "action" committees,
COUNCIL TEAMS formed from volunteer Council members, would be
(request: Gibson) appropriate to take a more proactive stance on community
issues, i.e., county-wide open space master plan; employee
housing; consolidation of services; rehabilitation/
reconstruction of "aging" VaiUincentives required; review
process in Community Development; etc.
I
I 1
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR EVENING MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1993
7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
2. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting
Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD
No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone
Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: MECM
Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings.
3. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance concerning the issuance of
Local Improvement Refunding Bonds of the Town of Vail, Colorado for the Booth Creek
Local Improvement District; ratifying action heretofore taken in connection therewith;
prescribing details in connection with said Bonds and District; prescribing duties of certain
Town officials in connection therewith; repealing all ordinances and other action of the
Town to the extent inconsistent herewith; and providing other matters relating thereto.
4. Adjournment.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 2/23/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING
WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/2/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
C:WGENDA.TC