The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-03-02 Support Documentation Town Council Regular Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING. TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Appointment of 3 New Members to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). 3. Appointment of 2 New Members to the Design Review Board (DRB}. 4. Appointment of 1 New Member to the Housing Authority. 5. Appointment of 4 New Members to the Art in Public Places Board (AIPP). 6. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the Minutes of the February 2, 1993, and February 16, 1993, Town Council Evening Meetings. B. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1993, second reading, an ardlnance concerning the issuance of Local Improvement Refunding Bonds of the Town of Vail, Colorado for the Booth Creek Local Improvement District; ratifying action heretofore taken in connection therewith; prescribing details in connection with said Bonds and District; prescribing duties of certain Town officials in connection therewith; repealing all ordinances and other action of the Town to the extent inconsistent herewith; and providing other matters relating thereto. 7. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: MECM Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings. 8. Resolution No. 3, Series of 1993, a resolution approving and adopting the 1993-1997 Town of Vail Transit Development Plan. 9. Town Council Appeal of a PEC Decision Re: Conditional Use Permit for the Expansion of the Municipal Building to House the Vail Police Department. 10. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 319193, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/16/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/16/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:UIGENDA.TC M VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Appointment of 3 New Members to the Planning and Environmental Kristan Pritz Commission (PEC). Action Reauested of Council: Based on the interviews conducted February 23, 1993, vote to determine which individuals will be appointed. There are 3 positions available, each term will be for two years (through February 28, 1995). Backaround Rationale: The candidates are Bill Anderson, Chuck Crist, Kathy Langenwalter, and Gena Whitten. 7:40 P.M. 3. Appointment of 2 New Members to the Design Review Board (DRB). Kristan Pritz Action Reauested of Council: Based on the interviews conducted February 23, 1993, vote to determine which individuals will be appointed. There are 2 positions available, each term will be for two years (through February 28, 1995). Backaround Rationale: The candidates are Michael Arnett, Sally Rich Brainerd, Alice Cartwright, Dan Doerge, Florence Steinberg, and Carmen Weiner. 7:45 P.M. 4. Appointment of 1 New Member to the Housing Authority. Kristan Pritz Action Reauested of Council: Based on the interview conducted February 23, 1993, vote to determine which individual will be appointed. There is 1 position available. The term will be a five year term (through January 31, 1998). Backaround Rationale: The candidates are Duane Piper and Dan Doerge. 7:50 P.M. 5. Appointment of 4 New Members to the Art in Public Places Board Kristan Pritz (AIPP). Action Reauested of Council: Based on the interviews conducted February 23, 1993, vote to determine which individuals will be appointed. There are 4 positions available. Two terms will be for two years and two terms for three years (February 28, 1995, and February 28, 1996, respectively). Backaround Rationale: The candidates are Alice Cartwright, Jim Cotter, Dan Doerge, Eddy Doumas, Lolita Higbie, Erich Hill, and Kyle H. Webb. 1 r r 7:55 P.M. 6. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the Minutes of the February 2, 1993, and February 16, 1993, Town Council Evening Meetings. Steve Thompson B. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance concerning the issuance of Local Improvement Refunding Bonds of the Town of Vail, Colorado for the Booth Creek Local Improvement District; ratifying action heretofore taken in connection therewith; prescribing details in connection with said Bonds and District; prescribing duties of certain Town officials in connection therewith; repealing all ordinances and other action of the Town to the extent inconsistent herewith; and providing other matters relating thereto. 8:00 P.M. 7. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance Shelly Mello repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Applicant: MECM Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, on second reading. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, on second reading. 8:30 P. M. 8. Resolution No. 3, Series of 1993, a resolution approving and Mike Rose adopting the 1993-1997 Town of Vail Transit Development Plan. Action Reauested of Council: Adopt the plan. Backaround Rationale: TDP needs to be submitted to the Colorado Department of Transportation by April 15, 1993, in order to apply for a grant for the next 5 years. Staff Recommendation: Adopt the plan. 8:40 P.M. 9. Town Council Appeal of a PEC Decision Re: Conditional Use Permit Mike Mollica for the Expansion of the Municipal Building to House the Vail Police Department, located at 75 S. Frontage Road West. Action Reauested of Council: Uphold/overturn/modify the decision of the PEC. Backaround Rationale: Please see the CDD's memo to Council dated March 2, 1993. Staff Recommendation: Please see the staff recommendation in the February 22, 1993, memo to the PEC. 9:25 P.M. 10. Adjournment. 2 d THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3!9/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/16!93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 3/16/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M., IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:VIGENDA.TCE 3 a MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, February 2, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob Levine Bob Buckley MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Gibson TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Before beginning with this meeting's first agenda item, Ron Phillips announced that Bill Lowe, mechanic with TOV's Fleet Maintenance Department since October, 1981, had passed away on February 1, 1993. There was a moment of silent prayer in honor of Bill's long-term, committed service to TOV. The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation of which there was none. Item No. 2 on the agenda was the presentation of plaque from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to TOV for its having achieved President Bush's 70% Seat Belt Usage Safety Honor Roll. Mary Lawrence, TOV Safety Manager, introduced Duke Smith of CDOT who described the program, and advised 75% seat belt usage was hoped for by 1995. Marvin Leach of CDOT presented the plaque to Mayor Osterfoss, and he advised that TOV would appear on the National Honor Roll in D.C. Item No. 3 was a Consent Agenda consisting of two items: A. Approval of Minutes of the January 5, 1993, and January 19, 1993, Vail Town Council Evening Meetings. B. Ordinance No. 2, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance of the Town of Vail, Colorado, decriminalizing traffic infractions; deleting the availability of jury trials and jail sentences for such violations; and making amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Jim Shearer moved to approve the Consent Agenda, with a second from Merv Lapin. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were MECM Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings. Council had received a memo dated February 1, 1993, from Larry Grafel, Public Works Director, prior to this meeting advising that a meeting with Ned Gwathmey, Eustaquio Cortina, Jerry Mullikin, Frank Freyer, Kent Rose, Greg Hall, and Larry had been held on Friday, January 29, 1993. The memo stated that meeting was positive and great progress had been made by the parties trying to resolve/determine what needed to be done, and at what cost, to bring Westhaven Drive up to TOV standards, but indicated it was not possible for all necessary information to be received and reviewed in time for this second reading. Ned Gwathmey requested this item be continued to the next evening meeting, February 16, 1993, and asked for guidance as to what Council would ask for as a guarantee that the required work would be done. Larry 1 Eskwith recommended either an irrevocable letter of credit TOV could draw on if certain terms and conditions were not met by the applicants, or funds set aside in a bank account TOV could draw on with certain terms and conditions pursuant to an agreement. Larry felt bonding companies would be reluctant to enter into any kind of surety agreement for this type of project. Larry said an estimate which was not a hard bid would not be 100% accurate, but felt an agreement could be entered into which would require the posting of a letter of credit from the applicants that exceeded the estimate. There was discussion about what the range of costs might be. Tom Steinberg asked Larry if it would be wiser to stipulate that this road should be brought up to TOV standards at no expense to TOV before a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) was issued for any new building. Larry said that was a possibility, but TOV would not have access to funds to get that done which could create a situation where buildings were constructed, no CO issued, and the road might not be completed. After brief discussion, Council and Ned Gwathmey agreed they wanted arrangements for either a set aside in a bank account or an irrevocable letter of credit and a developer's agreement laying out all of the terms and conditions of how that collateral was to be used. TOV would then be able to draw on that collateral should the required work not be done by a certain date. Mayor Osterfoss said, as part of this process based on estimates, an amount would be ascertained, and, in addition to that, a contingency would be set up so that TOV would have a dollar number Council was comfortable with. That was acceptable from Mr. Gwathmey's perspective. Shelly Mello said 125% of the estimated cost to cover the work and any overage or delays was the percentage generally used. Rob Levine moved to continue Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, until the February 16, 1993 evening meeting, with a second from Jim Shearer. Before a vote was taken, Mayor Osterfoss expressed appreciation for the cooperation of all involved for working toward the resolution of this long unresolved problem. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 5 was Resolution No. 2, Series of 1993, a resolution authorizing the purchase of an unplatted piece of land commonly known as the Vail Commons property, and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof ("the Property"). Larry Eskwith explained this resolution would authorize TOV to purchase a parcel of land located on the North Frontage Road, commonly known as the Vail Commons property. He noted negotiations had been ongoing for a considerable period of time, and terms had now been agreed upon by the Seller. The purchase price for the parcel, approximately 6.9 acres, was $3,161,972. The closing was scheduled for April 2, 1993. Larry said the only contingency that could affect the potential purchase of the land by TOV, other than title, survey, or environmental problems, was that the Seller wanted to obtain an appraisal which would show he was selling the property to TOV for less than fair market value because he wanted to take a charitable deduction for that portion of the differentiation between the purchase price and the value. Larry advised if that appraisal did not show the value of the land to be sufficient, then the Purchaser would have the opportunity to terminate the contract. Other than that, the contract was fairly standard. Tom Steinberg asked if TOV had an environmental report back on the property yet, but Larry said he did not want to expend funds on an environmental report until he had a signed contract, but the contract was totally contingent on TOV being satisfied, in its sole discretion, with the results of the environmental survey. Tom Steinberg moved to approve Resolution No. 2, Series of 1993, with a second from Merv Lapin. A vote was then taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 6 was a review of a sign variance request for Curtin-Hill Sports (previously Vail Ski Rentals), 254 Bridge StreetJLot 1, Block 5A, Vail Village 1st Filing. The applicants were Jack Curtin and Teak Simonett. At 8:05 P.M., the applicant had not yet arrived, and Mayor Osterfoss directed Tim Devlin to make an effort to call the applicant before beginning discussion of this item. While waiting for a response from Jack Curtin, Council discussed a Work Session item moved to the Evening Meeting, TOV reorganization. Steve Barwick distributed a proposed schedule entitled "Schedule of Activities for Development of New TOV Management/Budget Systems" which showed how TOV might proceed with all of the reorganizations discussed within the last few weeks. Steve asked Council for feedback on the schedule, and, if Council agreed to the recommended Steering Team, asked for Council member appointments to the Team. He reviewed the recommended Team composition. He said this group would be charged with investigating the various aspects of the program and making recommendations to the Town about formal changes in TOV's management and budget systems. Establishment of the Team would take place at this meeting, per the time frame on the handout. Steve reviewed the 2 time frame in full, beg~nn~ng with a first meeting on February 18, 1993. For six weeks, the Team would start meeting with each department to assist the departments with development of their mission statements and operational goals. In mid-March through mid-May, sub- groups of the Team would be appointed to start investigating TQM performance measurement, cost accounting, and expenditure control budgeting. By the end of May, the Team was to have prepared recommendations for those areas and how they would fit into TOV's plan. During June, the Team would integrate all of those recommendations into one f„~~alized program for TOV, and adoption by Council of the formalized program was scheduled for the first Evening Meeting in July, 1993. Steve said discussion concerning actual outcome measures of the mission statements and the operational goals would follow that. He felt if the proposed time schedule was adhered to, the 1994 budget process would largely be based upon this type of system rather than TOV's traditional line item approach to budgeting. Mayor Osterfoss said she had hoped for more representation from TOV staff than shown on Steve's handout, perhaps one person from each department. Rob Levine felt there was merit in that idea because one of the things Council had be told in response to the studies done was there was not as much team feeling between departments as there was within departments. Consensus was reached to include one staff representative in addition to the Director from each department on the Team, including Buck Allen from the Municipal Court Department. Steve noted it was an ambitious schedule, but felt if focus was maintained, it could be accomplished. Tom Steinberg was concerned about embarking on this project and the possibility of then changing direction after receipt of a final report from the staffworking on it. Steve said there were no guarantees, but felt there was enough staffbuy- in in the general principles of the programat this point that, as long as all concentrated on those items, what would be developed would be an acceptable product. Mayor Osterfoss said she felt the efforts that would be started in the next few weeks were basically foundation efforts, and, if there was a need to make some changes in direction, that could be incorporated into the process. In the spirit of moving forward on this project, there was discussion about how department members would be appointed or elected. Mayor Osterfoss asked Larry Grafel, given the diversity of his Department, if one individual could be chosen who others would feel to be representative of that entire Department. Larry felt he had to do a lot of talking about the focus wanted, but felt, at this time, one staff member could be representative to the whole PW Department. He asked that the option to have more than one representative from PW be held open temporarily. Mayor Osterfoss then volunteered to participate. Bob Buckley and Jim Shearer stated they felt Jim Gibson would volunteer if he were present. Mayor Osterfoss said she volunteered because she felt it would be meaningful for her to be in touch with the process. Merv Lapin stated he was interested in participating from the budgeting standpoint. Bob Buckley, having experience with TQM through VVMC, stated he might want to attend some of the meetings. Council agreed to wait to hear from Jim Gibson and would then finalize their selection process and advise Steve. Jack Curtin had arrived, discussion of agenda Item No. 6 began. Tim Devlin gave a quick overview of the proposed sign variance versus what was recommended for approval by the DRB as well as the staff. He said Curtin Hill Sports had proposed a sign variance involving two sections of the sign code. The first was from size; the second from number. Community Development Department's memo dated January 6, 1993, to the DRB included full details concerning the description of the request, background information, findings and staff responses, and staff's recommendation. Tim said staff recommended to DRB that four signs did not meet the criteria discussed in that memo's item 3 A,C,D, but staff did feel three signs did meet all four criteria, and they supported one additional sign and recommended denial of the extra sign area. He said the DRB, on January 6, 1993 recommended Council approve three signs and left it up to the applicant as to which three signs they wanted to leave. Tim said the applicant, at that time, expressed to the DRB that he would like one free standing sign, one hanging sign, and one awning sign. Tim discussed the conditions of approval from the DRB agenda from January 6,1993. Applicant Jack Curtin was surprised to learn Curtin Hill Sports had 20 window signs. He stated the three signs (free standing, hanging, and awning) were acceptable to them, and added he was working with T., ~ u staff to bring the various signs into conformance with the sign code. After brief discussion, Rob Levine moved to approve the staff recommendation with regard to the Curtin Hill sign variance request based on the findings indicated in the staff memo dated January 6, 1993, establishing hardship and general appropriateness, with a second from Jim Shearer. Before a vote was taken, Tom Steinberg asked if this decision set any precedent regarding signs. Kristan Pritz said they felt comfortable with the decision given the four building frontages, and felt the criteria for a variance had been met by the applicant. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. 3 There being no further business, Tom Steinberg moved to adjourn the meeting to Executive Session, with a second from Rob Levine. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned to Executive Session at 8:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Acting Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:IMINSFEB2.93 4 4 ORDINANCE NO. 3 Series of 1993 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF LOCAL IIViPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, OOLORADO FOR THE BOOTH CREEK LOCAL IlVIPROVEMENT DID t xICT; RA i lr SING ACTION HERETOFORE TAKEN IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; PRESCRIBING DETAILS IN CONNED. i iON WITH SAID BONDS AND DISTRICT; PRESCRIBING DL t irS OF CERTAIN TOWN Or r iCIALS IN CONNED. ~ SON THEREWITH; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND OTHER A~, i YON OF THE TOWN TO THE EX i ANT INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING OTHER MA 1 i SRS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail (the 'Town"), in the County of Eagle and State of Colorado, is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing as a home-rule town under Article XX of the State Constitution and the Charter of the Town (the "Charter"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Charter and the Town's Code of Ordinances (the "Vail Code"), the Town Council (the "Council") has by ordinance created within the corporate limits of the Town a local improvement district known and designated as the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District (the "District"), for the purpose of making certain local and special improvements to mitigate rockfall damage (the "Improvements"), and has determined to assess a portion of the cost thereof to the parcels of property in the District specially benefited thereby; and WHEREAS, the Town has duly advertised for bids for such Improvements based on estimates provided to the Council and has entered into a construction contract for the construction and installation of the Improvements; and WHEREAS, in order to defray in part the costs of the Improvements, the Tawn has heretofore issued its Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, Local Imr..,~,?ement Bonds, Series 1989, in the aggregate principal amount of -1- r - 5365,000 (the " 1989 Bonds") which were purchased by Firstbank of Vail (the "Purchaser"); and WHEREAS, because the construction compatry originally selected to construct the Improvements failed to build the Improvements in accordance with plans and specifications and subsequently brought suit against the Town, the final costs of the Improvements exceeded the original estimate; and WHEREAS, due to the delay caused by such failure and the subsequent litigation, the Town paid the interest due on the 1989 Bonds from Town funds until assessments could be levied against the benefitted properties in the District; and WHEREAS, the Councd has heretofore adopted an ordinance .(the"Assessment Ordinance") assessing the costs of the Improvements (except for certain costs paid by the Town) against parcels of property in the District (the "assessments") in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5487,187 in recognition of special benefits conferred on owners of parcels of property in the District and the amount of assessments remaining unpaid after the expiration of the cash payment period provided by the Code is 5379,771; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined, and hereby determines, that it is advantageous to, and in the best interests of; the Town and its citizens and inhabitants that the 1989 Bonds be refunded, paid and discharged as herein provided (the "Refunding Project"), and that the refunding bonds herein authorized (the "Bonds") be issued for the purpose of defraying in part the cost of the Refunding Project, all pursuant to Section 10.7 and 10.8 of the Charter; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Refunding Project is to reduce the net effective interest rate of the Refunded Bonds, to reduce the total interest payable over the life of the Refunded Bonds by issuing bonds at a lower net interest cost and having a lower net effective interest rate, to reduce the total principal and interest payable on the Refunded Bonds, and to effect other economies; and WHEREAS, the Refunding Project will permit the Town to lower the interest rate on the assessment installments; and -2- WHEREAS, the Purchaser has agreed to exchange the outstanding 1989 Bonds for the Bonds; and WHEREAS, due to the prepayment of assessments during the cash payment period the Town has available 565,000 and will call for prior redemption on April 1, 1993, 565,000 of the 1989 Bonds; and WHEREAS, no election is required prior to the issuance of the Bonds by Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution since the Bonds wdl be issued at a lower interest rate than the 1989 Bonds; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCII, OF THE TOWN OF VAII., COLORADO: Section 1. Issuance of Bonds Authorized. The Town and its officers have determined and do hereby determine that it is necessary and for the best interest of the Town and the inhabitants thereof that, pursuant to the Charter and the Vail Code, the Town issue and sell bonds to the Purchaser of the Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District in the aggregate principal amount of 5300,000 (the "Bonds") by exchanging the Bonds for the 1989 Bonds in an outstanding principal amount of 5300,000, for the purpose of effecting the Refunding Project. Section 2. Exchange of Bonds. The Town has det;,y a..ined to accept the offer of FirstBank of Vail to exchange all of the 1989 Bonds which will ~ ~...ain outstanding in the amount of 5300,000 after the redemption of 565,000 on April 1, 1993, for the Bonds. Section 3. Bond Details. For the purpose of effecting the Refunding Project, there shall be issued in the name of the Town bonds designated "Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, Local Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993," in the aggregate principal amount of 5300,000. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form (i.e., registered as to payment of both principal and interest) payable to the registered owner thereof in the denomination of 55,000 each, shall be dated as of their date of delivery, shall be numbered consecutively in regular numerical order G „u. 1 through 60, inclusive, shall mature on April 1, 1999, and shall bear interest from the date of the Bonds until maturity (unless redeemed prior to maturity) at the rate of 7.25% per annum. -3- ~ Bonds which are reissued upon transfer or other replacement shall bear interest from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of the Bonds, such interest being payable to the registered owners of the Bonds semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing October 1, 1993. The principal of the Bonds is payable to the registered owner thereof as shown on the registration books of the Town kept by C:...u nl Bank National Association in Dem+er, Colorado, or its successor (the "registrar"), upon presentation and surrender at the office designated by Central Bank National Association in Dem?er Colorado, or its successor (the "paying agent"). I~ upon presentation of arty bond at maturity, payment is not made as therein provided, interest thereon shall continue at the same rate per annum previously borne by the bond, until the principal thereof is paid in full. Payment of interest on arty bond shall be made to the registered owner thereof by check or draft mailed by the paying agent on or before each interest payment date (or, if such interest payment date is not a business day, on or before the next succeeding business day), to the registered owner thereof at his address as shown on the registration books kept by the registrar at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month preceding the interest payment date: but any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the registered owner thereof at the close of business on such day and shall be payable to the person who is the registered owner thereof at the close of business on a special record date for the payment of any such defaulted interest. Such special record date and the date fixed for the payment of such defaulted interest shall be fixed by the registrar whenever moneys become available for payment of the defaulted interest, and notice of the special record date and the date fixed for the payment of such defaulted interest shall be given to the registered owners of the Bonds not less than ten days prior thereto by first-class mail to each such registered awner as shown on the registration books on a date selected by the registrar, stating the date of the special record date and the date fixed for the payment of such defaulted interest. The paying agent may make payments of interest by such alternative means as may be mutually agreed to between the owner of any bond and the paying agent. All such payments shall -4- be made in lawful money of the United States of America without deduction for the services of the paying agent or registrar. Section 4. Prior Redemption. All of the Bonds shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the Taws in regular numerical order on any bond interest payment date, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date. Whenever there are available moneys in the 'Town of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, 1993 Bond Retirement Fund" (the "Bond Fund") which is hereby created, in excess of the amount required to pay interest on the Bonds then outstanding on the next interest payment date, the Town shall exercise its option to redeem on the next practicable interest payment date a suitable number of Bonds outstanding. Nothing herein shall preclude the Town from refunding all or a portion of the Bonds or from exercising its right to redeem Bonds prior to maturity from any available source of funds. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, there shall be no prior redemption of the Bonds before April 1, 1996 except from the payment or prepayment of assessments. Notice of prior redemption shall be given by the paying agent in the name of the Town by sending a copy thereof by certified or registered first class mail, postage rY ;,raid, to the registered owner of each bond designated for redemption at his address as it appears on the registration books as of the close of business on the day preceding the mailing of such notice. Such notice shall specify the number or numbers of the Bonds to be so redeemed and the date fixed for redemption, and shall further state that on such date there will be due and payable upon each bond so to be redeemed at the office designated by the paying agent the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date, and that from and after such date interest shall cease to accrue. Notice having been given in the manner hereinabove provided, the bond or bonds so called shall become due and payable on the date so designated, and upon presentation thereof at the paying agent, the Tawn will pay the bond or bonds so called. Failure to give notice by mailing or any defect in such notice shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any other Bonds. Any notice mailed as herein r. ~ aided shall be conclusively presumed to have been given, whether or not received. Any Bonds redeemed prior to maturity shall be cancelled by the -5- - Paying Agent. No notice of redemption shall be given unless the Town has available funds in its custody in an amount sufficient to redeem the Bonds described in such notice. Section 5. R,_,e 'stration and Transfer. The Town shall cause to be kept at the registraz books for the registration and transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any bond at the office designated by the registraz, fully endorsed for transfer or accompanied by an assignment duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney duly authorized in writing, the registraz shall authenticate and deliver in the name of the transferee a new bond bearing the same number as the bond being surrendered. All Bonds issued upon any transfer shall be the valid obligations of the Taws evidencing the same obligation and entitled to the same security and benefits under this ordinance as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer. The registraz shall require the payment by the owner of any bond requesting transfer of any tax or other governmental chazge required to be paid with respect to such transfer, and the registraz may further impose a reasonable service chazge for any transfer of Bonds. The registrar shall not be required to transfer any bond during a period beginning at the opening of business 15 days before the day of mailing by the registraz of a notice of prior redemption of Bonds and ending at the close of business on the day of such mailing, nor, with respect to a particular bond after the publication or the mailing of notice calling such bond for prior redemption. As to any bond, whether or not such bond be overdue, the person in whose name the same shall be registered shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for the purpose of making payments thereof and for all other purposes (except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 5 hereof) and neither the Town, the registraz, the paying agent nor any other agent of the Town shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Except as otherwise provided in Section 5 hereof; payment of either principal or interest on any bond shall be made only to or upon the written order of the registered owner thereof or his legal representative, but such registration may be changed as hereinabave provided. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and dischazge the liability upon such bond to the extent of the sum or sums paid. -6- If any bond shall be lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated, the registrar shall, upon receipt of such evidence, information or indemnity relating thereto as it or the Town may reasonably require, and upon payment of all :,..ses in connection therewith, authenticate and dealer a replacement bond bearing the same number as the lost, stolen, destroyed or mutilated bond. If such lost, stolen, destroyed or mut~7ated bond shall have matured or shall have been called for redemption, the registrar may direct that such bond be paid by the paying agent in lieu of replacement. All Bonds surrendered for redemption, payment or transfer, if surrendered to the paying agent, shall be cancelled by the paying agent, and, if surrendered to any person other than the paying agent, shall be delivered to the paying agent for cancellation. Section 6. Negotiability. Subject to the registration provisions of this ordinance, the Bonds shall be fully negotiable and shall have all the qualities of negotiable paper, subject to the registration and payment provisions stated herein, and the owner or owners thereof shall possess all rights enjoyed by holders of negotiable instruments under the provisions of the "Uniform Commercial Code -Investment Securities." Section 7. Execution and Authentication. The Bonds shall be executed in the name of the Town with the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor, shall bear the manual or facsimile impression of the seal of the Town, shall be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Town Clerk, and shall be authenticated by the manual signature of a duly authorized officer of the registrar. The Bonds bearing the signatures of the officers in office at the time of the authorization thereof shall be the valid and binding obligations of the Town (subject to the requirement of authentication by the registrar), notwithstanding that a~+ or all of the persons whose signatures appear thereon shall have ceased to fill their respective offices. Pursuant to the Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act, part 1 of article 55 of title 11, Colorado Revised Statutes, the Mayor and Town Clerk shall prior to delivery of the Bonds file with the Secretary of State of Colorado their manual signatures certified by them under oath, if the Bonds are to be executed with their facsimile signatures. No bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose unless the certificate of authentication, substantially in the form hereinbelow provided, has been duly executed by the registrar. The registrar's certificate of authentication shall be deemed to have been executed -7- by it if manually signed by an authorized officer or employee of the registrar, but it shall not be necessary that the same officer or ,~.u~,layee sign the certificate of suthendcation on all of the Bonds issued hereunder. By authenticating any of the Bonds delivered pursuant to this ordinance, the registrar shall be deemed to have assented to all of the provisions of this ordinance. Section 8. Payment of Bonds. The Bonds authorized by this ordinance and the interest thereon shall be payable (except as provided in Section 9 hereof) solely from moneys in the Bond Fund, consisting only of moneys collected (principal, interest and penalties, if any) from a portion of the assessments to be levied to pay for the Improvements (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 9 hereof). Any assessments in the Bond Fund remaining after the Bonds, both principal and interest, are paid in full (and after any reimbursement due the Town), shall to the extent required by the Charter be deposited in the Town's surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter. Immediately upon the collection of any assessments (including interest and any penalties thereon), the moneys therefrom shall be deposited in the Bond Fund (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 9 hereof), and said fund is and will continue to be irrevocably and exclusively pledged for the payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds. Section 9. Surolus and Deficiency Fund: Town Payment of Bonds and Reimbursement. Pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter, whenever there is a deficiency in the Bond Fund to make the payment of principal and interest on the outstanding Bonds when due, such deficiency shall be paid out of the Town's surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Charter. Further, whenever three-fourths of the Bonds have been paid and cancelled and for any reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the remaining Bonds and the interest due thereon, and there is not sufficient money in the Town's surplus and deficiency fund, then the Town shall pay the Bonds when due and interest thereon, and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. Because the Town paid interest on the 1989 Bonds until assessments could be levied, the Town may reimburse itself for the amounts paid by the Town by transferring up -8- to twenty-five percent of the amount of each assessment installment to any fund of the Town as determined by the Town Manager or hia designee. in the event that a court of competent jurisdiction enters a final, non-appealable order holding that the assessment levied against airy property in the District shall be reduced, then the T.~~~.,. shall not transfer airy portion of the assessment payments made with respect to such pr..r:,. iy to any fund of the Town other than the Bond Fund. Section 10. Bonds Not a Debt of Town. The Bonds shall not be a debt of the Tawn, and the Town shall not be liable thereon, nor shall it thereby pledge its full faith and credit for their payment, nor shall the Bonds be payable out of airy funds other than the special assessments and other moneys pledged to the payment thereof, as herein provided. The payment of Bonds is not secured by an encumbrance, mortgage or other pledge of property of the Town except for such special assessments. No property of the Town, subject to said exception, shall be liable to be forfeited or taken in payment of the Bonds. Section 11. Form of Bonds. The Bonds and the registrar's certificate of authentication shall be in substantially the following forms, with such omissions, insertions, endorsements and variations as to any recitals of fact or other provisions as may be required by the circumstances, be required or permitted by this ordinance or be consistent with this ordinance and necessary or appropriate to conform to the rules and requirements of any governmental authority or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto, and provided that any of the text on the face of the Bonds may, with appropriate reference, be printed on the back of the Bonds: -9- (Form of Bond) UIvt t ~D STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAII, COLORADO BOv i ri CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LOCAL Il1~iPROVEMENT REFUNDING Bonds SERIFS 1993 NO. CUSIP Interest Rate Maturity Date Dated as of Number 7.25% April 1, 1999 , 1993 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: X5,000 The Town of Vail (the 'Town") in the County of Eagle and State of Coloradq a municipal c.,~ Y.,~ ation duly organized and existing, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner identified above, or registered assigns, upon presentation and surrender hereof at such office designated by Central Bank National Association in Denver, Colorado, or its successors (the "Paying Agent"), the Principal Amount identified above on the Maturity Date identified above (subject to the right of prior redemption hereinbelow mentioned), and to pay interest on the Principal Amount from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of this Bond, at the Interest Rate per annum identified above, payable on October 1, 1993 and semiannually thereafter on April 1 and October 1 of each year, until payment of the Principal Amount hereof has been made. Interest on this Bond will be paid on or before each interest payment date (or, if such interest payment date is not a business day, on or before the next succeeding business day) to the registered owner of this Bond by check or draft mailed to such registered owner at the address appearing on the registration books kept for that purpose at the office of Central Bank National Association in Denver, Colorado, as Registrar, at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month preceding the interest payment date (the "Regular -10- - Record Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid sha[1 cease to be payable to the person who is the registered owner hereof at the close of business on the Regulaz Record Date and shall be payable to the person who is the registered owner hereof at the close of business on a Special Record Date for the payment of any defaulted interest. Such Special Record Date and the date fined for the payment of defaulted interest shall be fixed by the Registrar whenever moneys become available for payment of the defaulted interest, and notice of the Special Record Date and the date fixed for the payment of defaulted interest shall be given to the registered owners of the Bonds of the series of which this is one not less than ten days prior thereto. Alternative means of payment of interest may be used if mutually agreed to between the owner of any Bond and the Paying Agent, as provided in the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Bonds (the "Bond Ordinance"). The principal of and interest on this Bond aze .payable in lawful money of the United States of America, without deduction for the services of the Paying Agent or Registraz. If upon presentation and surrender of this Bond to the Paying Agent at maturity payment of this Bond is not made as herein provided, interest hereon shall continue at the Interest Rate identified above until the Principal Amount hereof is paid in full. This Bond is one of a series subject to prior redemption in regulaz numerical order by and at the option of the Town of Vail, on any interest payment date, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof with accrued interest to the redemption date. Whenever there aze available moneys in the Bond Fund in excess of the amount required to pay interest on the Bonds then outstanding on the next interest payment date, the Town will exercise its option to redeem on the next practicable interest payment date a suitable number of Bonds outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, there shall be no prior redemption of the Bonds before April 1, 1996 except from the payment or prepayment of assessments. Nothing shall preclude the Town from refunding ail or a portion of the Bonds or from exercising its right to redeem Bonds prior to maturity from any available source of funds. -11- Redemption shall be made upon giving prior notice by mailing to the owner of this Bond at his address as the same appears upon the registration books, in the manner and upon the conditions provided in the Bond Ordinance. The Registrar will not be required to transfer am? Bond during a period beginning at the opening of business IS days before the day of the mailing by the Registrar of a notice of prior redemption of Bonds and ending at the close of business on the day of such mailing, or, with respect to a particular Bond, after the mailing of notice calling such Bond for prior redemption. This Bond is one of a series of local imr:. ~ cement Bonds numbered consecutively from 1 to 60, both inclusive, issued by the Tawn of Vail, and maturing on April 1, 1999, all of which are of like designation, and which are in the aggregate principal amount of X300,000. Said Bond series is issued in payment for local improvements made in the Tovvn of Vail, Colorado Booth Creek Irocal Improvement District pursuant to and in accordance with the Charter and the Vail Code, the ordinance creating the District, and all laws and proceedings thereunto enabling. Pursuant to the Bond Ordinance, reference to which is made for further details, the principal of and the interest on the Bonds of the series of which this is one shall be payable solely from a special fund designated "Town of Vad, Colorado Booth Creek Local Improvement District, 1993 Bond Retirement Fund" (the "Bond Fund") consisting of a portion of the moneys collected by the Town of Vail from the special assessments (principal, interest and penalties, if any) to be levied against all the assessable parcels of land in the District, to the extent provided in the Bond Ordinance. The Bond Fund is irrevocably and exclusively pledged for the full and prompt payment of all the Bonds. If there is a deficiency in the Bond Fund to meet the payment of the outstanding Bonds and interest due thereon, the deficiency shall be paid out of any moneys available therefor in the surplus and deficiency fund created pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Town's Charter. Whenever three•fourths of the Bonds have been paid and cancelled and for a~? reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the remaining Bonds and interest due thereon, and there is not sufficient money in the surplus and deficiency fund, then the Town shall pay the Bonds when -12- due and the interest thereon and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. All assessments shall be a lien in the several amounts assessed from the effective date of the assessment ordinance to be adopted by the Town upon completion of the local improvements in the District. The lien for such assessments shall be prior and superior to all other liens except general tax liens, other assessment liens, and possibly other liens imposed by the State of Colorado or its political subdivisions or by the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof. In the Bond Ordinance, the Town covenants to levy and collect assessments against all assessable parcels of property in the District and to diligently enforce the lien of the assessments against the pr~..~r:..~~? subject thereto. It is hereby certified, recited and declared that the principal amount of the Bonds does not exceed the amount authorized by law to be issued. It is hereby also certified, recited and declared that the proceedings taken to date with reference to issuing the Bonds and to making such local improvements have been regularly had and taken in compliance with law; that all prerequisites to issuing the Bonds have been performed; and that all acts, conditions and things essential to the validity of this Bond exist, have happened and have been done in due time, form and manner as required by law. The Bonds are not a debt of the Town and the Town is neither liable thereon, nor has it pledged its full faith and credit for their payment, nor are the Bonds payable out of any funds other than special assessments and other amounts pledged to the payment thereof as herein stated. The payment of the Bonds is not secured by an encumbrance, mortgage or other pledge of property of the Tawn except for such special assessments pledged for the payment of the Bonds. No property of the Town, subject to said exception, shall be liable to be forfeited or taken in payment of the Bonds. The Town has designated the Bonds of the series of which this is one as a qualified tax-exempt obligation pursuant to Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This Bond is fully transferable by the registered owner hereof in person or by his duly authorized attorney on the registration books of the Town kept at the office of the -13- Registrar upon surrender of this Bond together with a duly executed written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar. Upon such transfer a new Bond of the same principal amount and bearing the same number will be issued to the transferee in exchange for this Bond, on payment of such charges and subject to such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Bond Ordinance. The Tovvn, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes except to the extent otherwise hereinabove and in the Bond Ordinance provided with respect to the payment of interest, and neither the Town, the Registrar nor the Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. This Bond must be registered in the name of the owner as to both principal and interest on the registration books kept by the Registrar in conformity with the provisions stated herein and endorsed hereon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Bond Ordinance. No transfer of this Bond shall be valid unless made on the registration books maintained at the principal office of the Registrar by the registered owner or his attorney duly authorized in writing. This Bond shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose until the Registrar shall have manually signed the certificate of authentication hereon. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Town Council of the Town of Vail has caused this Bond to be executed with the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor, and to be signed and attested with the manual or facsimile signature of the Town Clerk under the manual or facsimile impression of the seal of the Town. Signed: (Manual or Facsimile Si~naturel Mayor (MANUAL OR FACSIlVIILE SEAL) Attest: (Manual or Facsimile Sienaturel Town Clerk -14- Certificate of Authentication for Bond This is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Bond Ordinance, and this Bond has been duly registered on the registration books kept by the undersigned as Registrar for such Bonds. CENTRAL BANK NATIONAL AS50CIATION Demrer, Colorado, as Registrar Date of Authentication: By Authorized Representative -15- ASSIGNMENT FOR BOND FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and irrevocably ar ~ ~ : nts ,attorney-in-fact, to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereoiy with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: NOTICE: The signature to Signature Guaranteed: this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without any alteration whatsoever. Address: Tax Identification Number or Social Security Number(s): (End of Form of Bond) -16- Section 12. Delivery and Annlication of Proceeds. When the Bonds have been duly sold, executed and registered, the Town shall deliver the Bonds to the Purchaser in exchange for the 1989 Bonds. The registrar shall initially register the Bonds in the name of the purchaser, or in the names of such transferees as the purchaser may designate in writing or writings satisfactory to the registrar, or any combination thereof as directed by the purchaser. Section 13. Levy of Assessments. The Town has heretofore caused the assessments to be levied and collected as provided by [aw for the benefit of the registered owners of the Bonds. The Town hereby covenants for the benefit of each owner of the Bonds that the principal amount of the assessments remaining unpaid as of the date of delivery of the Bonds is in an amount at least equal to the principal amount of the Bonds. The Town covenants that the assessments will bear interest at a rate which is at least equal to the highest rate of interest on the Bonds and payable in one payment or in 10 annual installments of principal, on March 1 of each year commencing on March 1, 1993, with interest on the unpaid principal balance of the assessment, payable annually on March 1 of each year commencing March 1, 1993. The Town hereby covenants to diligently enforce the. lien of the assessments against the property subject thereto. Section 14. Assessment Revenues. Alt moneys received from such assessments, including interest and any penalties thereon (except to the extent that such moneys are payable to the Town as a reimbursement pursuant to Section 9 hereof), shall be deposited into the Bond Fund and said moneys, along with arty other moneys deposited into the Bond Fund pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance, shall be used for the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Bonds and for no other purpose whatsoever, and as security for such payment the Bond Fund is hereby exclusively pledged. Section 15. Books and Records. So long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding, the Town wilt keep or cause to be kept true and accurate books of records and accounts showing full and true entries covering the collection and disposition of special assessments as well as any delinquencies in the collection thereof covering deposits and disbursements in the Bond Fund, the redemption of Bonds, both principal and interest, and disbursements to defray the cost of the Improvements, including incidental expenses; and the -17- Town wdl permit an inspection and examination of all books and accounts at all reasonable times by a representative of the original purchaser of the Bonds. Section 16. Resignation of Registrar or Pavin ent. If the registrar or paying agent initially appointed hereunder shall resign, or if the Town shall reasonably determine that said registrar or paying agent has become incapable of fulfilling its duties hereunder, the Town may, upon notice mailed to each registered owner of the Bonds at his address last shaven on the registration books, appoint a succes.or registrar or paying agent, or both. No such resignation or dismissal may take effect until a successor is appointed. Every such successor registrar or paying agent shall be the Town or a bank or trust ~....,pany located in and in good standing in the State of Colorado. It shall not be required that the same institution serve as both registrar and paying agent hereunder, but the Town shall have the right to have the same institution serve as both registrar and paying agent hereunder. Section 17. Authorized Action. The officers of the Town hereby are authorized and directed to take all action necessary or appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this ordinance, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the printing of the Bonds (which may include thereon an opinion of bond counsel and related certification by the Town Clerk), the execution of such certificates as may reasonably be required by the initial purchaser thereof or bond counsel, relating, inter alia, to the signing of the Bonds, the tenure and identity of the municipal officials, the absence and existence of factors affecting the exemption of interest on the Bonds from federal income taxation, the accuracy of property descriptions, the delivery of the Bonds and the absence of litigation pending or threatened affecting the validity of the Bonds, if such is in accordance with the facts, and the execution of a bond purchase contract and appropriate agreements with respect to the services of paying agent and registrar. Section 18. Bondholders' Ri¢hts and Remedies. Any owner of any one or more of the Bonds may, either at law or in equity, by suit, action, mandamus or other appropriate proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction, protect the lien created by this ordinance on the proceeds of said assessments and the moneys in the Bond Fund, and may by suit, action, mandamus or other appropriate proceedings enforce and compel the performance of any covenant of the Town or any duty imposed upon the Taws by the -18- provisions of this ordinance, or any ordinance heretofore or hereafter adopted concerning the District, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the segregation of assessments into the Bond Fund, the proper application thereof and the appointment of a receiver. The failure of any such owner so to proceed shall not relieve the Town, the Council or any of the Town's officers, agents or employees of am? liability for failure to perform any such duty. No remedy or right conferred by this ordinance is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy or right, but each such remedy or right is cumulative and may be pursued without waiving any other remedy or right. Section 19. Tax Covenants. The T ~ ~ ~ ~ covenants for the benefit of the registered owners of the Bonds that it will not take any action or omit to take any action with respect to the Bonds, the proceeds thereon any other funds of the Town or any facilities financed or refinanced with the proceeds of the Bonds if such action or omission (i) would cause the interest on the Bonds to lose its exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Tax Code, (ii) would cause interest on the Bonds to lose its exclusion from alternative minimum taxable income as defined in Section 55(b)(2) of the Tax Code except to the extent such interest is required to be included in calculating the adjusted current earnings adjustment applicable to corporations under Section 56 of the Tax Code in calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income, or (iii) would cause interest on the Bonds to lose its exclusion from Colorado taxable income or Colorado alternative minimum taxable income under present Colorado law. The foregoing covenant shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the payment in full or defeasance of the Bonds until the date on which all obligations of the Town in fulfilling the above covenant under the Tax Code and Colorado law have been met. Section 20. Designation as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. The Town hereby designates the Bonds as a qualified tax-exempt obligation for purposes of Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the Tax Code. Section 21. Defeasance, When the Bonds have been fully paid both as to principal and interest, all obligations hereunder (other than the obligations set forth in Section 19 hereof) shall be discharged, and the Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding for any purpose of this resolution. Payment of any Bonds shall be deemed made -19- when the Toa.Y has placed in escrow with a commercial bank exercising trust powers, an amount sufficient (including the known minimum yield from Federal Securities) to meet all requirements of principal of and interest on such Bonds as the same become due to maturity or to a designated prior redemption date; and, if the Bonds are to be redeemed prior to maturity, when the Tawn has given to the Registrar irrevocable written instructions to give notice of prior redemption in accordance with Section 5 hereof. The Federal Securities shall become due prior to the respective times on which the proceeds thereof shall be needed, in accordance with a schedule agreed upon between the Town and such bank at the time of creation of the escrow. Federal Securities within the meaning of this section shall include only direct obligations of; or obligations the principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States, and which are not callable prior to their scheduled maturities by the issuer thereof; or interests in such obligations. Section 22. Amendment or Sunnlement of Ordinance. This ordinance may be amended or supplemented by an ordinance or ordinances adopted by the Tawn Council in accordance with the Charter and the Vail Code with or without the receipt by the Town of any additional consideration, with the written consent of the owners of 75 percent of the Bonds authorized by this ordinance and outstanding at the time of the adoption of such amendatory or supplemental ordinance, provided, however, that no such ordinance shall have the effect of permitting: (a) an extension of the maturity of any bond authorized by this ordinance without the written consent of the owner of the bond; or (b) a reduction in the principal amount of any bond or the rate of interest thereon without the written consent of the owner of the bond; or (c) the creation of a lien upon or a pledge of property, revenues or funds, ranking prior to the liens or pledges created by this ordinance; or (d) a reduction of the principal amount of Bonds required for consent of such amendatory or supplemental ordinance. Section 23. Ratification. All action (not inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance) heretofore taken by the Town, the Council and the officers of the Tawn, directed toward the creation of the District, the construction and other acquisition of the -20- I Improvements therein, the sale and issuance of the Bonds, and the levy of assessments for that pu. r ...+e, hereby is ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 24. Ordinance Irrenealable. After the Bonds have been issued, this ordinance shall constitute a contract between the Too.. and the owner or owners of the Bonds and shalt be and remain irrepealabie until the Bonds and the interest accruing thereon shall have been fully paid, satisfied and discharged. Section 25. Limitation on Challenge. After the expiration of 30 days from the date of final adoption and arr. „ ual of this ordinance, all actions or suits attaching its findings, det:.....inations and contents or questioning the legality of the Bonds and all proceedings relating thereto shall be perpetually barred, and the ordinance and Bonds shall be conclusive of the facts stated therein and shall be conclusively deemed valid and legal in every court or tribunal and shall not be open to contest for any reason. Section 26. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 27. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of airy provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 28. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer -21- R shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, Ar r nOVED. AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON rixST READING this 16th day of February, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 2nd day of March, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor (SEAL) Attest: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Acting Town Clerk READ AND ArrnOVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor (SEAL) Attest: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Acting Town Clerk -22- ORDINANCE NO. 1 SERIES 1993 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE NO. 41, SERIES OF 1991, TO PROVIDE CHANGES TO AREA A REQUIREMENTS FOR SDD NO. 4 THAT CONCERN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE WATERFORD, AND THE CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT BUILDING SITES; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, MECM Enterprises and Commercial Federal Savings have requested an amendment to the existing Special Development District No. 4, Area A; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Commission has recommended that certain changes be made to Special Development District No. 4; and WHEREAS, the Town Council considers that it is reasonable, appropriate, and beneficial to the Town and its citizens, inhabitants, and visitors to repeal and reenact Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991 to provide for such changes in Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, THAT: Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, is hereby repealed and reenacted, as follows: Section 1. Amendment Procedures Fulfilled. Planning Commission Report. The approval procedures described in Chapter 18.40 of the Vail Municipal Code have been fulfilled, and the Town Council has received the recommendations of the Planning and Environmental Commission for an amendment to the development plan for Special Development District No. 4. Section 2. Special Development District No. 4 Special Development District No. 4 and the development plans therefore, are hereby approved for the development of Special Development District No. 4 within the Town of Vail. Section 3 Chapter 18.46 Special Development District No. 4, Cascade Village, is hereby repealed and re-enacted with amendments to read as follows: 18.46.010 Purpose Special Development District No. 4 is established to ensure comprehensive development and use of an area in a manner that will be harmonious with the general character of the Town, provide adequate open space and recreational amenities, and promote the objectives of the Town of Vail Comprehensive Plan. Special Development District No. 4 is created to ensure that the development density will be relatively low and suitable for the area and the vicinity in which it is situated, the development is regarded as complementary to the Town by the Town Council and ' the Planning Commission, and because there are significant aspects of the Special Development District which cannot be satisfied through the imposition of standard zoning districts on the area. 18.46.020 Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: A. "Special attraction" shall be defined as a museum, seminar or research center or performing arts theater or cultural center. B. "Transient residential dwelling unit or restricted dwelling unit" shall be defined as a dwelling unit located in amulti-family dwelling that is managed as a short term rental in which all such units are operated under a single management providing the occupants thereof customary hotel services and facilities. A short term rental shall be deemed to be a rental for a period of time not to exceed 31 days. Each unit shall not exceed 645 square feet of GRFA which shall include a kitchen having a maximum of 35 square feet. The kitchen shall be designed so that it may be locked and separated from the rest of the unit in a closet. A transient dwelling unit shall be accessible from common corridors, walks, or balconies without passing through another accommodation unit, dwelling unit, or a transient residential dwelling unit. Should such units be developed as condominiums, they shall be restricted as set forth in Chapter 17.26 Condominiums and Condominium Conversions. The unit shall not be used as a permanent residence. Fractional fee ownership shall not be allowed to be applied to transient dwelling units. For the purposes of determining allowable density per acre, transient residential dwelling units shall be counted as one half of a dwelling unit. The transient residential dwelling unit parking requirement shall be 0.4 space per unit plus 0.1 space per each 100 square feet of GRFA with a maximum of 1.0 space per unit. 18.46.030 Established A. Special Development District No. 4 is established for the development on a parcel of land comprising 97.955 acres as more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A. Special Development District No. 4 and the 97.955 acres may be referred to as "SDD No. 4. B. The district shall consist of four separate development areas, as identified in this ordinance consisting of the following approximate sizes: 2 r ' Area Kriown As Development Area Acreage Cascade Village A 17.955 Coldstream Condominiums B 4.000 Glen Lyon Duplex Lots C 29.100 Glen Lyon Commercial Site D 1.800 Dedicated Open Space 40.400 Roads 4.700 TOTAL 97.955 18.46.040 Development Plan--Required--Approval Procedure A. Each development area with the exception of Development Areas A and D shall be subject to a single development plan. Development Area A shall be allowed to have two development plans for the Cascade Club site as approved by the Town Council. The Waterford and Cornerstone sites shall be allowed one development plan each. Development Area D shall be allowed to develop per the approved phasing plans as approved by the Town Council. The developer shall have the right to proceed with the development plans or scenarios as defined in Section 18.46.103, 1-4. B. Amendments to SDD No. 4 shall comply with the procedures outlined in Section 18.40. C. Each phase of development shall require, prior to issuance of building permits, approval of the Design Review Board in accordance with applicable provisions of Chapter 18.52. 18.46.050 Permitted Uses A. Area A. Cascade Village 1. First floor commercial uses shall be limited to uses listed in 18.24.030 A-C. The "first floor" or "street level" shall be defined as that floor of the building that is located at grade or street level; 2. A!I other floor levels besides first floor street level may include retail, theater, restaurant, and office except that no professional or business office shall be located on street level or first floor (as defined in Section 18.24.030 A of the Town of Vail zoning code in Area A) unless it is clearly accessory to a lodge or educational institution except for an office space having a maximum square footage of 925 square feet located on the first floor on the northwest corner of the Plaza Conference Center building; 3. Lodge; 4. Multi-family dwelling; 5. Single Family dwelling; 3 ' 6. Two-Family dwelling; 7. Transient residential dwelling unit; 8. Employee dwelling as defined in Section 18.46.220; 9. Cascade Club addition of a lap pool or gymnasium. B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums 1. Two-family dwelling; 2. Multi-family dwelling. C. Area C, Glen Lvon Duplex Lots 1. Single family dwelling; 2. Two-family dwelling. D. Area D. Glen Lvon Commercial Site 1. Retail; 2. Restaurant and bar; 3. Business and professional offices; 4. Multi-family dwelling; 5. Employee dwelling as defined in Section 18.46.220. 18.46.060 Conditional Uses Conditional uses shall be reviewed per the procedures as outlined in Chapter 18.60 of the Town of Vail zoning code. A. Area A, Cascade Village 1. Cascade Club addition of a wellness center not to exceed 4,500 square feet. 2. Fractional fee ownership as defined in the Town of Vail Municipal Code, Section 18.04.135 shall be a conditional use for dwelling units in the Westhaven multi-family dwellings. Fractional fee ownership shall not be applied to restricted employee dwelling units or transient residential dwelling units. Ownership intervals shall not be less than five weeks. 3. Special attraction; 4. Ski lifts; 5. Public park and recreational facilities; 6. Major arcades with no frontage on any public way, street, walkway or mall area. 4 B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums 1. Public park and recreational facilities; 2. Ski lifts. C. Area C. Glen Lvon Duplex Lots 1. Public park and recreational facilities; 2. Ski lifts. D. Area D, Glen Lvon Commercial Site 1. Micro-brewery as defined in Town of Vail Municipal code, Section 18.04.253. 18.46.070 Accessory Uses A. Area A. Cascade Village 1. Minor arcade. 2. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. 3. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential uses. 4. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 5. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary to the operation thereof. B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums 1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. 2. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential uses. 3. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 4. Swimming pools, tennis courts, patios or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary to the 5 operation thereof. C. Area C, Glen Lyon Duplex Lots 1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. 2. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential uses. 3. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. D. Area D, Glen Lyon Commercial Site 1. Home occupations, subject to issuance of a home occupation permit in accordance with the provisions of Sections 18.58.130 through 18.58.190. 2. Attached garages or carports, private greenhouses, swimming pools, tennis courts, patios, or other recreational facilities customarily incidental to permitted residential uses. 3. Other uses customarily incidental and accessory to permitted or conditional uses, and necessary for the operation thereof. 4. Minor arcade. 18.46.080 Location of Business Activity A. All offices, businesses, and services permitted by Sections 18.46.050 through 18.46.070 shall be operated and conducted entirely within a building, except for permitted unenclosed parking or loading areas, and the outdoor display of goods. B. The area to be used for outdoor display must be located directly in front of the establishment displaying the goods and entirely upon the establishment's own property. Sidewalks, building entrances and exits, driveways and streets shall not be obstructed by outdoor display. 18.46.090 Density--Dwelling Units The number of dwelling units shall not exceed the following: A. Area A, Cascade Village In Area A, a minimum of three hundred fifty-two (352) accommodation or transient dwelling units and a maximum of ninety-four dwelling units as defined by the tables in Section 18.46.103 for a total density of two hundred seventy (270) 6 dwelling units. B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums Sixty-five (65) dwelling units C. Area C, Glen Lvon Duplex Lots One-hundred four (104) dwelling units. D. Area D, Glen Lvon Commercial Site Three dwelling units, two of which shall be employee dwelling units as defined by the table in Section 18.46.103F. 18.46.100 Density--Floor Area A. Area A, Cascade Village The gross residential floor area (GRFA) for all buildings shall not exceed 288,695 square feet. B. Area B, Coldstream Condominiums Sixty-five thousand square feet (65,000 s.f.) GRFA. C. Area C. Glen Lvon Duplex Lots GRFA shall be calculated for each lot per Section 18.13.080 density control A and B for the Primary/Secondary district of the Town of Vail municipal code. D. Area D, Glen Lvon Commercial Site The gross residential floor area for the two employee dwelling units shall be 795 square feet and 900 square feet respectively. The gross residential floor area for the free market dwelling unit shall be 1,630 square feet. 18.46.102 Commercial Sauare Footaae A. Area A, Cascade Village Area A shall not exceed 35,698 square feet of commercial area. Commercial uses include retail, office, theater, restaurant, uses listed in Section 18.46.050 A-1, and the special attraction use. B. Area D, Glen Lvon Commercial Site Area D shall not exceed 16,730 square feet of office for Phase I, IA & II or 15,584 square feet of office for Phase III per the approved development plans. The micro-brewery and associated uses shall be constructed per the approved development plan. 7 18.46.103 Development Statistics for Area A. Cascade Village, and Area D, Glen Lvon Commercial Site I CHART 1 Area A Comp{ett:d Aro{ects ~y ; i Retail/ Square On-Site Cascade Structure AUs DUs GZFA I Commercial_ Feet I Pa__r_king_ Parkinct PJI{LLRACE I I ~ 16 i 20,000 ~ I 28 ~ 0 IrtILLRACE fl I I 14 I 17.534 I I I 25 I 0 M{LLRACE IV I I I i Units""' ~ I 6 I 10,450 I l 19 I o WESTM I 148 I 55,457 I I 0 ? 115 Aliredo's ~ 104 Seats 0 0 Cafe ~ 74 Seats 0 0 Little Shop I 1,250 0 0 Pepi Sports ~ I I I 2,491 0 0 W & H Smith, Vaurnet 1 X00 0 CMC BUILDING I Cascade Wind ~ 8 I 15,870 0 16 Clancy's 1,600 ( 0 13.3 Theater 4,220 28 College Classrooms ( 0 40 Collego Office 0 ~ 4 Theater/Meeting Room 2JI I 1,387 0 ~ 11.5 TERRACE WtNG Rooms I 120 58,069 0 105 I ` 5,856 I 0 20 i I Ret~. I ~ PL6~ZA ! I I I Rooms 20 7.205 _ I 0 16 I 1,099 i I 0 4 etail I R PLAZA II I i I ~ 0 I 35 Conference Retail ~ I ( I 925 ~ 0 I 3 CASCADE CLUi3 1 Retail 300 0 1 Ear & Restcurant 252 0 3.5 Oitice in CMC 828 0 3 Wellness Center ~ 1,386 0 7 Ottice in Club 1 ~ 420 0 1.4 TOTALS I 288 AU I 44 DU ~ 184,585 I 19,173 I I 72 I 426.7 l~~x the purposes of calculating Cltl~il fur ti:e Cosgriff p:uccl (Mi[iruc:c IV), no credits shall be given except for 30Q sy. ft. to be: allowed for each enctoud parking space, per Section 18.4G.210(cx5)(j). 8 CHART 2 Area A Proposed Projects ~ ' I ~ On-Site Cascade 1. CORNERSTONE LAU or TR 1. __DU _GRFA__ Commercial Square Feet Parkfng______I_ Structured Parking_ Units 64 TR l I - j8g00 ~ I ~ 3 Employee Units' ~ 3 Retail_ _ I -L-_. 1____11_100_ J I 37 I _ _ -1 - 2f3,110 I 11.100 93 TOTALS 64 TR I On-Site Cascade 2. WATERFORD _AU orT_ R I DU GRFA Commercial _Square Feet_ .Parking Structured Parking_ Units 27 DU ~ 17 000 I ~ 26 Emplovee Units TOTALS 27 DU 47,500 I I 58 I 3. Westhaven On-Site Cascade Condos AU orTR DU GRFA _ C_o_m_mercial _Square Feet Parking Structured Parking_ Units 20 I 22.500 4U Employee Units (Max #1 I I t0 I 6,400 ~ I ~ 20 TOTAL 20 DU I 22,500 f I I 60 I On-Site Cascade 4. Millrace III AU orTR DU GRFA I Commercial Square Feetl Parking I Structured Parking_ Units I ~ 3_I _ _6.000 I ____I I 6 I TOTAL I -r-3 QU ~ 6,000- ~ 6 5. Cascade Club On-Site Cascade Addition AU orTR DU~GRFA Commercial) Square Feet1 Parking Structured Parking_ Scenario 1 (Wellness Center) 4,500 22.5 or Scenario 2 (Gymnasium) _ _ 4 ,500 0 TOTALS Scenario 1 ~ I 4,500 I I 22.5 Scenario 2 4.500 On-Site Cascade 6. Plaza Oftice•• AU or TR DU ~ GRFA_l Commercial ~$quare_Feet I Parking. I Structured Parking_ I t I 925 I 1 I .7-"' - TOTAL 64 TR 50 DU 104,110 16,525 4,500 217 I 23.2 MAXIMUMS • L' nployx units shall not count toward density or GKI~A for the purpose of this SUU. 1'Iva apace has already been counted for a retail perking ra{uirtancnt. The new parking rcyuircmpu is based on the difference between the retail anti office parking requirements. •~~'('otal figures represent highest density and commercial sccnaritx. :.x:.:;: ,;:r ;r::::y:;r: CHART 3: Area A Required Parking Parking for Completed Projects Parking Spaces per Chart 1 in Cascade Parking Structure 426.7 Proposed Projects wl req. parking in the Cascade Parking Struc.: Scenario 1 -Wellness Center 22.5 OR Scenario 2 -Gymnasium 0.0 Plaza Office 0.7 Subtotal I 449.9 Less 17.5% Mixed-Use Credit -78.7 Total Req. Parking at Build-Out of Area A in Cascade Struc. 371.2 Exist. Parking in Cascade Structure 421.0 Required Parking in Cascade Struc. at Build-Out of Area A With 17.5% mixed-use credit 371.2 9 " Area Ur~1~s GP.FA ' (Acres) 16. DU/Acre 35) . .Original Parcel •15.68 252.00 256,437 Robbins Parcel 1.23 19.68 18,752 ' Cos~~riff Parcel ~ 1.045 1.5.7.P 15.93?. ' 17.955 288.40 291,].21 F. DEVFLOPME:.T FOR AREA D, GLEt1 LYON COMt~IERCIAI, SITE 5DD ~ 4 , UREA ,D DEVELOPMENT SQUAREjF00TAGE AND P1IRKING PER TOWtJ OF VA~IL IZEQUIFtEMENTS FEBRUARY 26, 1390 PHASE Ia PHASE I,Ia & II PHASE I,Ia,II AND III DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT ,Sq.Ft./Parking Sq.Ft. / Parking, Sq.Ft. /Parking Glen Lyon C~f:Lce Bldg. (E:c:Esting} 10,150 A0.6 10,150 40.6 10,150 40.6 PI',~'1;~E ZA en Lyon i Office Bldg. 900 1.6 400 1.6 i 400 1.6 PHASE x - ~ • Cle~z Lyon ' 'Jldq. i O:Efice 0 2, 400 9. 6 2, 400 9. 6 FiA:S F. I Y 7~ic:ro-3rewery -Office 0 3,780 15.1 2,634. 10.5 -Reception/ :Museum 0 480 0.0 ~ 980 0.0 -Retail 0 175 .6 885 3.0 -Fermentation/ • Brewhouse 0 970 0.0 1,406 0.0 -Beer Nall 0 1,700 18.8* 1,700 18.8* (150 seats) (150 seats) -Brew Pub 0 1,380 10.0* 1,380 10.0* (80 seats) (80 seats) SUBTOTAL 10, 550 42.2 2i, 435 96.3 21, 435 94.1 • PIIAS~ III ~ j • ~ ~ : East Building l ` ' -2 Employee ; ' ~ . • Units 0 0 0.0 ~ 2, 695 14.0 : -1 Dwelling ! j • • Unit 0 0 0.0 i . 1, 630 2 , 0 • • • ' -Office ~ 0 0 0.0 j 2, 400 9.6 _ • • . 5i)E,TOT~,L 0 0 0.0 ~ 3, 325 ' 25.6 I 1 ; ~ ••j ~ . TOTAL COMtiERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ,ti ~ r • • ; • ; CQCIARE FOOTAGE AND PARKIi1G • 21,435 ~ 96.3 24,760 110.0 • I *U"ED HIGHEST PARY,ING REQ. POSSIBLE• BASED ON ;SEATING 10 18.46.104 Development Plans Site specific development plans are approved for Area A and Area D. The development plans for Area A are comprised of those plans submitted by Vail Ventures, Ltd. and other developers. The development plans for Area D are comprised of those plans submitted by the Glen Lyon Office Building, a Colorado Partnership. The following documents comprise the development plan for the SDD as a whole, Waterford, Cornerstone, Cascade Club Addition Scenario 1 and 2, Millrace IV, and Area D-Glen Lyon Commercial Site and is not all inclusive: 1. Waterford, Sheet #L-2, dated 11-12-92, Landscape Plan, Dennis Anderson. 2. Waterford, Sheet #1.1, dated 11-13-92, Site/Grading Plan Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 3. Waterford, Sheet #2.1, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 38/43' 3", Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 4. Watertord, Sheet #2.2, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 48'-6"/53'-0", Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 5. Watertord, Sheet #2.3, dated 11-13-92 Plan Level 59'-0:/64'-3" by Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 6. Waterford, Sheet #2.4, dated 11-4-92, Plan Level 69'-6"/74'-9", Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 7. Watertord, Sheet #2.5, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 80'-0"/85'-3" Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 8. Waterford, Sheet #2.6, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 90'-6" Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 9. Waterford, Sheet #2.7, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 101'-0" Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 10. Watertord, Sheet #2.8, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 111'-6" Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 11. Watertord, Sheet #2.9, dated 11-13-92, Plan Level 122'-0" Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 12. Waterford, Sheet #2.10, dated 12-14-92, Roof Plan All Levels Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 13. Waterford, Sheet #3.1, dated 11-13-92, Elevations Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 14. Waterford, Sheet #3.2, dated 11-13-92, Elevations, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 11 15. Waterford, Sheet #4.1, dated 11-4-92, Sections Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 16. Waterford, Sheet #4.2, dated 11-4-92, Sections, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 17. Waterford, Sheet #4.3, dated 11-4-92, Sections, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 18. Waterford, Sheet #9.1, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 19. Waterford, Sheet #9.2, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 20. Waterford, Sheet #9.3, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 21. Waterford, Sheet #9.4, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schuttz. 22. Waterford, Sheet #9.5, dated 10-20-92, Unit Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 23. Cornerstone, Sheet #L-1, dated 11-13-92, Landscape Plan Dennis Anderson. 24. Cornerstone, Sheet #1, dated 12-21-92, Cascade Village Master Plan Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 25. Cornerstone, Sheet #2, dated 12-29-92, Floor Plans Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 26. Cornerstone, Sheet #3, dated 12-29-92, Floor Plans, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. Schultz. 27. Cornerstone, Sheet #4, dated 12-21-92, Elevations Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 28. Cornerstone, Sheet #5, dated 11-13-92, Site Plan/Grading Plan, Gwathmey, Pratt, Schultz. 29. Cascade Club Addition Site Plan, Roma, 10/10/88. 30. Cascade Club Floor Plan, Roma, 10/10/88. 31. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/k/a Cosgriff Parcel, Site Plan, Arnold Gwathmey Pratt, 10/28/91. 32. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/k/a Cosgriff Parcel, Elevations Arnold Gwathmey Pratt, 10/22/91. 33. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/Wa Cosgriff Parcel, Floor Plans Arnold Gwathmey Pratt, 10/23/91. 34. Millrace IV, Scenario I, a/k/a Cosgriff Parcel, Landscape Plan, Dennis Anderson Associates. 35. Cosgriff Parcel, Survey, Alpine Engineering, Inc., 10/31/91 stamped. 36. Survey, a part of Cascade Village, Eagle Valley Engineering, Leland Lechner, 6/8/87. 37. Site Coverage Analysis, Eagle Valley Engineering, 10/10/88. 38. Cascade Village Special Development District Amendment and Environmental 12 Impact Report: Peter Jamar Associates, Inc., Revised 11/22/88. Area D. Glen Lvon Commercial Site 1. Area D Master Site Plan, Geodesign by Sherry Dorward, 2/22/90. 2. Landscape Plan for Area D, Geodesign by Sherry Dorward, 2/22/90. 3. Area D elevations, Geodesign by Sherry Dorward, 2/9/90. 4. Vait Micro-brewery, Seracuse, Lawler, and Partners, Denver, CO., sheets A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A3.1, A3.2, A4.1, A4.2, dated 1 /8/90 and sheet A2.4 dated 12/13/89. 5. Vail Brewery Roof Study, Frank Freyer, 1/8/90. 6. Glen Lyon Parking Garage Floor Plans and Site Plan, Roma, 11/28/88. 7. Glen Lyon Parking Garage Sections/Elevations, Roma, 11/28/88. 8. Glen Lyon Condominium, Roma, 11/28/88. 9. Glen Lyon Condominium East Building, Roma, 11/28/88. 10. Deck Enclosure (Phase IA) to Glen Lyon Office Building, Pierce, Segerberg and Spaeh, dated 9/20/90: 11. Landscape Plan, Phase IA Deck Enclosure, Pierce, Segerberg and Spaeh, dated 8/19/91. 12. Office Addition to Glen Lyon Office Building, Buff Arnold/Ned Gwathmey Architects August 25, 1989 Sheets Al through A4. 13. Cascade Village Special Development District Amendment and Environmental Impact Report: Peter Jamar Associates, Inc., Revised 11 /22/88. Letter from Peter Jamar Associates, Inc., dated January 16, 1990. 14. Deceleration lane design for South Frontage Road, RBD, October 18, 1988 as approved by Co. Div. of Hgwys. 15. A resubdivision of Lot 54 amended plat Glen Lyon Sub-division, Eagle Valley Surveying Inc. as approved by T.O.V. 16. Vail Brewery Parking Analysis, TDA Colorado, Inc., August 10, 1988 and Vail Brewery Parking Analysis Update, TDA Colorado, Inc., January 16, 1990 pages 1-8. 18.46.110 Development Standards The development standards set out in Sections 18.46.120 through 18.46.180 are approved by the Town Council. These standards shall be incorporated into the approved development plan pertinent to each development area to protect the integrity of the development of SDD No. 4. They are minimum development standards and shall apply unless more restrictive standards are 13 incorporated in the approved development plan which is adopted by the Town Council. 18.46.120 Setbacks A. Area A, Cascade Villaae Required setbacks shall be as indicated in each development plan with a minimum setback on the periphery of the property of not less than twenty feet, with the exception that the setback requirement adjacent to the existing Cascade parking structure/athletic club building shall be two feet as approved on February 8, 1982, by the Planning and Environmental Commission. All buildings shall maintain a 50 foot stream setback from Gore Creek. The Waterford building shall maintain a minimum 20 foot setback from the north edge of the recreational path along Gore Creek. B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums Required setbacks shall be as indicated on the development plan. C. Area C, Glen Lvon Duplex Lots Required setbacks shall be governed by Section 18.13.060 Setbacks of the Primary/Secondary zone district of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. D. Area D. Glen Lvon Commercial Site Required setbacks shall be as indicated on the approved development plans. 18.46.140 Height A. For the purposes of SDD No. 4 calculations of height, height shall mean the distance measured vertically from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive), at any given point to the top of a flat roof, or mansard roof, or to the highest ridge line of a sloping roof unless otherwise specified in approved development plan drawings. B. Area A, Cascade Villaae 1. The maximum height for the Westin Hotel, CMC Learning Center, Terrace Wing, Plaza Conference Building and Cascade Parking Structure/Athletic Club is 71 feet. 2. Cornerstone Building: Maximum height of 71 feet. 3. Waterford Building: Maximum height of feet as measured from finished grade to any portion of the roof along the north elevation shall be 55' (South Frontage Road) 56' along the west elevation Westhaven Drive), and 65 feet along the south and east elevation as measured from finished grade. 14 4. Westhaven Building: A maximum of 55 feet. 5. Millrace III: A maximum of 48 feet. 6. Millrace IV: A maximum of 36 feet. 7. Cascade Club Addition: A maximum of 26 feet. 8. Cascade Entry Tower: A maximum of 36 feet. 9. The remainder of buildings in Area A shall have a maximum height of 48 feet. C. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums The maximum height shall be 48 feet. D. Area C. Glen Lvon Dualex Lots The maximum height shall be 33 feet for a sloping roof and 30 feet for a flat or mansard roof. E. Area D. Glen Lvon Commercial Site 51 % of the roof shall have a height between 32 and 40 feet. 49% of the roof area shall have a height under 32 feet. On the perimeter of the buildings for Area D, height is measured from finished grade up to any point of the roof. On the interior area of any building, height is measured from existing grade up to the highest point of the roof. Development plan drawings shall constitute the height allowances for Area D. 18.46.160 Site Coveraae In Areas A and B, no more than 35% of the total site area shall be covered by buildings, provided, if any portion of the area is developed as an institutional or educational center, 45% of the area maybe covered unless otherwise indicated on the site specific development plans. In Area C, no more than 25% of the total site area shall be covered by buildings, unless the more restrictive standards of Chapter 18.69 of the Vail Municipal Code apply. In Area D, no more than 37% of the total site area shall be covered by buildings and the parking structure. 18.46.170 Landscapina At least the following percentages of the total development area shall be landscaped as provided in the development plan. This shall include retention of natural landscape, if appropriate. Areas A and B, fifty percent, and in Areas C and D, sixty percent, of the area shall be landscaped unless otherwise indicated on the site specific development plans. 18.46.180 Parking and Loading A. Area A, Cascade Village 1. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52, 15 ` except that 75% of the required parking in Area A shall be located within a parking structure or buildings with the exception of Millrace IV, Scenario I, where 66.6% of required parking shall be enclosed in a .building. If the development table in Section 18.46.103 is amended, the parking requirements shall be amended accordingly. 2. There shall be a total of 421 spaces in the main Cascade Club parking structure. A 17.5 percent mixed-use credit per the Town of Vail parking code, Section 18.52.20 has been applied to the total number of required parking. spaces in the Cascade structure. 3. There shall be a total of 58 on-site parking spaces on the Waterford building site with a minimum of 75% of the required space .located below grade. No mixed use credit shall be applied to this site. 4. There shall be a minimum of 93 enclosed parking spaces located within the Cornerstone building with 37 of the required spaces available to the public for short-term parking. No mixed use credit has been applied to this lot. 5. The third floor of the Cascade parking structure shall not be used to meet any parking requirements for accommodation units, transient residential dwelling units, employee dwelling units or dwelling units. 6. Phasing: All required parking for Cornerstone and Waterford shall be located on their respective sites. All required parking for the Cascade Club Wellness Center Addition Scenario 1 shall be provided in the Cascade parking structure. 7. Seventy-five percent of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a landscaped berm for Westhaven Condominiums, and Millrace III. 8. All loading and delivery shall be located within buildings or as approved in the development plan. B. Area B. Coldstream Condominiums Fifty percent of the required parking shall be located within the main building or buildings and hidden from public view from adjoining properties within a landscaped berm. C. Area C, Glen Lvon Duplex Lots 16 ' Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 18.52. D. Area D. Glen Lvon Commercial Site 1. Phase I, IA and II shall include 80 surface parking spaces plus 6 valet parking spaces on the east end of the surface parking lot. Phase IA shall include 2 additional required parking spaces for a total of 43 required parking spaces. 2. Phase III shall include a minimum of 108 parking spaces. A minimum of 100 spaces shall be located in the parking structure. All required parking for the east building shall be provided on-site per Town of Vail parking requirements per Section 18.52.100 for residential and office use. A minimum of eleven spaces shall be located in the garage of the east building and a maximum of 5 surface spaces shall be located adjacent to the east building. 3. Area D development shall meet the operational requirements outlined in the TDA Colorado Inc. Report, Section Parking Analysis Considerations, January 16, 1990. Parking Analysis Considerations pages 1-B. 4. Valet parking shall be prohibited on the west end of the surface parking lot. 5. The Brew Pub shall not be open to the public until after 4:30 p.m. for Phase I and II Monday through Friday. When Phase III development occurs including the parking structure, the brew pub may operate during the weekdays once the parking structure is available for public use. 6. The Beer Hall shall not operate or be used by the public before 4:30 p.m. on weekdays, Monday through Friday at anytime. 7. Once the parking structure is constructed, the parking and access to Area D shall be managed per the TDA Parking Report, Parking Management Section, pages 6 and 7, August 10, 1988, and TDA Report, Vail Brewery Parking Analysis Update, dated January 16, 1990, both written by Mr. David Leahy. 8. No loading or delivery of goods shall be allowed on the public right-of-way along the South Frontage Road adjacent to the Area D development. 9. The owner of the property and brewery management shall prohibit semi-truck and trailer truck traffic to the Glen Lyon Commercial site. The only truck loading that shall be allowed to the site shall be vans having a maximum length of 22 feet. 18.46.190 Recreation Amenities Tax Assessed 17 The recreational amenities tax due for the development within SDD No. 4 under Chapter 3.20 shall be assessed at a rate not to exceed twenty-five cents per square foot of the floor area in Development Area A; and at a rate not to exceed fifty cents per square foot of GRFA in Development Area B; and at a rate not to exceed fifteen cents per square foot of GRFA in Development Area C; and at a rate not to exceed seventy-five cents per square foot of floor area in Development Area D; and shall be paid in conjunction with each construction phase prior to the issuance of building permits. 18.46.200 Conservation and Pollution Controls A. The developer's drainage plan shall include a provision for prevention of pollution from surface runoff. B. The developer shall include in the building construction, energy and water conservation controls as general technology exists at the time of construction. C. The number of fireplaces permitted shall be as set forth in Section 8.28 of the Town of Vail Municipal as amended. D. If fireplaces are provided within the development, they must be heat efficient through the use of glass enclosures and heat circulating devices as technology exists at the time of development. E. All water features within Development Area A shall have overflow storm drains per the recommendation of the Environmental Impact Report by Jamar Associates on Page 34. F. All parking structures shall have pollution control devices to prevent oil and dirt from draining into Gore Creek. G. In Area D, a manhole on the brewery service line shall be provided so that the Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Sanitation District may monitor BOD strength. H. In Area D, the brewery management shall not operate the brewery process during temperature inversions. It shall be the brewery owner's responsibility to monitor inversions. I. All trash compactors and trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed within Special Development District 4. J. Protective measures shall be used during construction to prevent soil erosion into Gore Creek, particularly when construction occurs in Areas A and D. K. The two employee dwelling units in Area D shall only be allowed to have gas 18 fireplaces that meet the Town of Vail ordinances governing fireplaces. 18.46.210 Additional Amenities and Approval Aareements for Special Development District No. 4. A. The developer shall provide or work with the Town to provide adequate private transportation services to the owners and guests so as to transport them from the development to the Village Core area and Lionshead area as outlined in the approved development plan. B. Developer shall provide in its approved development plan a bus shelter of a design and location mutually agreeable to developer and Town Council. Said shelter to serve the area generally. C. Area A, Cascade Village 1. The developer shall be responsible for providing abreak-away bollard for the emergency access road between Eagle Pointe/Park Meadows, 1472 Matterhorn Circle, and Westhaven Drive. The design of the bollard shall he mutually acceptable to the developer and Town of Vail. This improvement shall be constructed when a building permit is requested for the Cornerstone, Millrace III, Millrace IV, Westhaven Condominiums, Waterford buildings, or Cascade Club addition. The bollard shall be included in the permit plans. The bollard shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the Cornerstone, Millrace III, Millrace IV, Westhaven Condominiums, Waterford buildings, or Cascade Club addition. 2. The developer shall construct a sidewalk that begins at the entrance to the Cascade Club along Westhaven Drive and extends to the west in front of the Westhaven building to connect with the recreational path to Donovan Park. The walk shall be constructed when a building permit is requested for Westhaven Condominiums. The sidewalk shall be part of the building permit plans. The sidewalk shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for Westhaven Condominiums. 3. The developer shall provide 100-year floodplain information for the area adjacent to the Waterford and Cornerstone buildings to the Town of Vail 19 Community Development Department before building permits are released for either project. 4. The conditions for Area A in Sections 18.46.020 B, 18.46.180 A. 1-7, 18.46.200 A - F, I, J, 18.46.210 C, 1-3, and 18.46.220 shall be set forth in restrictive covenants subject to the approval of the Town Attorney and once so approved shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County. The developer shall be responsible for submitting the written conditions to the Town Attorney for approval before a building permit is requested for the Cornerstone, or Millrace III, or Millrace IV, Westhaven Condominiums, or Waterford buildings, or Cascade Club Addition. 5. Millrace IV, Scenario I. a. The developer shall obtain an easement from the owners of the property adjacent to the eastern boundary of the property commonly called the Cosgriff Parcel, which is more specifically defined in Exhibit A, attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. The easements shall be sufficient to permit the construction, maintenance and replacement of retaining walls for the purposes of grading and boulder retention all along the western property line of said adjacent property. The easement shall be in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney, shall run with the land, and shall be recorded on the land records of .Eagle County prior to Design Review Board review. b. The developer shall provide the Community Development Department of the Town with written consent from the Upper Eagle Valley Water and Sanitation District permitting the encroachment of certain decks specified in the development plan for the Millrace IV condominiums, as set forth in Section 18.46.140(18) of this ordinance into their sewer easement recorded in Book 217, Page 428 of the land records of Eagle County. This consent shall be submitted prior to Design Review Board review. c. The developer shall receive final approval of the site grading plan for the construction of Millrace IV, Scenario I, from the Town Engineer prior to Design Review Board review. d. The Millrace Condominium Map, recorded at Book 326, page 257, 20 of the land records of Eagle County shall be amended so that the access easement shown thereon shall align with the present location of the roadway on the western property line of the Cosgriff Parcel, and the amendment shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County. e. The developer shall install 15 (6'-10') evergreens south of the South Frontage Road adjacent to the Cascade Club building, and 5 (6'-10') evergreens to the south of the Westhaven Apartment foundations and north of Westhaven Drive. The developer shall obtain the written approval of the Colorado Department of Highways (CDOH) permitting the installation of these trees along the South Frontage Road prior to said installation. If CDOH approval cannot be obtained, then a minimum of 10 (6'-10') evergreens shall be installed adjacent to the Westhaven Apartments. f. The developer shall apply for and complete the minor subdivision process for the Cosgriff Parcel and a subdivision plat signed by the Town of Vail shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County prior to the release of any building permits for the construction of any structure on the Cosgriff Parcel. g. Landscaping along the south and west property lines of the Cosgriff Parcel shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board to insure a suitable buffer area between it and the other properties along said property lines. h. The Design Review Board shall review the architecture and landscape plan further for compatibility with the surrounding area. i. The developer and the adjacent property owners shall submit a landscape plan for the area north of the Cosgriff property to the Design Review Board for review. j. For purposes of calculating Gross Residential Floor Area permitted on the Cosgriff Parcel, no credits of any kind (overlapping stairs, mechanical, etc.), except for 300 sq. ft. to be allowed for each enclosed parking space, shall be given. 6. Cornerstone a. Before the building permit is released for the project, the developer shall permanently restrict three employee housing units in 21 accordance with Section 18.46.220 of this ordinance. b. The developer shati complete asphalt borings and an as-built survey and provide them to the Town of Vail for the area of Westhaven Drive adjacent to the Cornerstone site in order to determine the condition of Westhaven Drive. The Town Engineer shall determine when these drawings shall be required. c. The landscape plan set forth in the development plan for Cornerstone between the Terrace Wing and Cornerstone building shall be revised prior to the review of the project by the DRB in the following ways: 1. For emergency services, an access lane shall be provided from the western courtyard to the ski lift. 2. If deemed necessary by the developer and the Community Development Department staff, the water feature on the landscape plan may be removed or revised. The landscaping in this area shall be part of the Cornerstone development and, therefore, it Is the Cornerstone developer's responsibility to complete this portion of the project prior to the release of a final Certificate of Occupancy for the project. These plans shall be included in the building permit for the Cornerstone development. d. The area of Westhaven Drive under which parking is located for the Cornerstone project shall be conveyed and transferred to the Cornerstone property and shown on the minor subdivision for the Waterford site. An easement shall be granted to the Town of Vail over this area for public access. The minor subdivision shall be submitted by the developer before a building permit is released for the Waterford or Cornerstone site. e. All fireplaces shall be gas appliances pursuant to Section 8.28 of the Vail Municipal Code. f. Those spaces allocated to commercial areas as short term public parking shall be permanently restricted for the use of the Cornerstone project. All required parking associated with the uses shall not be conveyed, used or leased separately from the uses. 22 Public parking on the Westhaven Drive level of the Cornerstone project shall be made available to the public for short term parking. 7. Watertord a. The developer shall permanently restrict the two employee housing units provided in the Waterford Development Plan in accordance with Section 18.46.220 of this ordinance. b. A minor subdivision plat shall be completed and recorded prior to the release of any building permits for either the Cornerstone or Waterford developments including the provision outlined in Section 18.46.210 6d. c. The developer shall complete asphalt borings and an as-built survey to determine the condition of Westhaven Drive from the South Frontage Road to the south end of the Cul-de-sac on Westhaven Drive. The developer shall provide stamped, engineered construction drawings for any road revisions that are necessary to meet the Town of Vail Subdivision Standards. These construction drawings shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Vait's engineer prior to the release of a building permit. All road improvements shall be completed by the developer for the project prior to the release of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (T.C.O.). The road shall be dedicated to the Town prior to the release of a T.C.O. The developer shall dedicate a public access easement for the remainder of Westhaven Drive which shall be conveyed to the Town within 30 days within the approval of the SDD amendment under consideration by the Town Council for MECM Enterprises. The developer shall take all steps necessary to permit the Town of Vail to enforce its parking ordinances on Westhaven Drive. d. The recreation path shall be relocated as set forth on the development plan and shall be amended on the minor subdivision plat for the Waterford and Cornerstone lots to correspond to the new location. e. The DRB will review the landscaping in the areas of the 23 retaining walls on the west and east ends of the site. The DRB will review the north elevations architectural details. The applicant shall review the possibility of eliminating the skier access on the east end of the project. However, if the applicant can significantly decrease the retaining walls necessary to build the access, the skier access may remain. f. All fireplaces shall be gas logs permitted pursuant to Section 8.28 of the Vail Municipal Code. D. Area D, Glen Lyon Commercial Site. 1. The developer shall agree to construct a bus lane per Town of Vail standards in the area of the porte-cochere of the Micro-brewery in Area D. The specific location for the bus lane shall be mutually agreed to by the Area D owner and/or developer, Colorado Division of Highways, and Town of Vail. The bus lane shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for either the brewery addition, office expansion excluding Phase IA, east office building, or parking structure. The developer and/or owners of area D shall be responsible for maintaining the new bus lane, including snow removal. If the lane is not maintained properly or snow removal is not adequate, the Town will not provide bus service to the site. 2. The developer shall relocate the existing bike path on Area D and provide a new bike path easement across the Glen Lyon property and CDOH property per the development plan for Area D. The bike path shall be constructed per Town of Vail standards. The bike path shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for either the brewery addition, office expansion excluding Phase IA, east office building, or parking structure. Such temporary certificate of occupancies shall be conditional upon construction of the bike path provided for herein. The bike path easement shall be replatted and approval obtained from the Town Council prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for either the Brewery addition, office expansion excluding Phase IA, east office building or parking structure. 24 3. The developer shall underground the electrical utilities along the north side of the Glen Lyon property from the northwest corner of the property to the northeast corner of the property. This utility work shall be constructed subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for either the Brewery addition, office expansion, excluding Phase IA east office building or parking structure. 4. The developer shall be responsible for relocating the 20 foot utility easement on the western portion of Development Area D as well as obtaining approval from the Town of Vail for the relocated utility easement before a building permit is released for the micro-brewery addition. 5. The developer of the Glen Lyon Office property shall not file any remonstrance or protest against the formation of a local improvement district of other financing mechanism approved by the Vail Town Council which may be established for the purpose of building road improvements for the South Frontage Road. 6. The developer shall provide a fire hydrant per Town of Vail Fire Department requirements on the northwest portion of the property. The specific location for the fire hydrant shall be approved by the Vail Fire Department. The fire hydrant shall be provided subsequent to the issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the brewery addition, office expansion excluding Phase IA, east office building, or parking structure. 7. The Developer shall construct a deceleration lane along South Frontage Road per the CDOH access permit. The developer shall submit plans for the South Frontage Road improvements to the Town of Vail Engineer for review and approval before a building permit is released for either Phase I excluding Phase IA, II, or III construction. 8. The conditions for Area D in Sections 18.46.180 D, 18.46.200 A, B, F - K, 18.46.210 D, 1-7, and 18.46.220 shall be set forth in restrictive covenants subject to the approval of the Town Attorney and once so approved shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County. The developer shall be responsible for submitting the written conditions to the Town Attorney for approval before a building permit shall be issued for the Micro-brewery, office expansion excluding 25 Phase IA, east office building, or parking structure. 9. The minor subdivision for Area D shall be developed per the following conditions: a. The development of parcels A, B, C, and D, shall be limited to the SDD No. 4 development plan and governed by the SDD No. 4 ordinance as approved by the Town of Vail and on file with the Department of Community Development or as amended and approved by the Community Development Department, Planning and Environmental Commission, and/or the Vail Town Council. b. The minor subdivision plat shall include a statement that development of the four parcels shall be governed by the approved SDD 4 development plan for area D and governing ordinances. c. The Community Development Department and Town of Vail Attorney shall have the right to review and require changes in any "Agreements of Tenants in Common", "Conveyance of Easement and Party wall Agreements", and any other easement or ownership agreements related to the development of parcels A, B, C, and D to ensure that the four parcels are developed per the approved development plan in SDD No. 4 Ordinance. d. The developer shall be responsible for replatting the 20 foot utility easement on the western portion of development Area D as well as obtaining approval from the Town of Vail for the new utility easement before the minor subdivision plat is recorded. Any modifications or amendments to the minor subdivision conditions of approval agreement shall be reviewed as a major amendment under the procedures outlined in Section 18.40 of the Town of Vail Zoning Code. e. The conditions for the minor subdivision in Section 18.46.210 (D9) A, B, C, and E, shall be set forth in restrictive covenants subject to the approval of the Town Attorney and once so approved shall be recorded on the land records of Eagle County. The developer shall be responsible for submitting the written conditions to the Town Attorney before the minor subdivision is recorded on the land records of Eagle County. 26 10. The entire Glen Lyon Office Building and Brewery Building shall be sprinklered and have a fire alarm detection system. Town of Vail Fire Department approval of the sprinkler and fire alarm systems shall be required before a building permit is released for Phase I excluding Phase IA or II. 11. The developer shall submit a set of amended plans to the Colorado Division of Highways for review and approval. The improvements on CDOH property proposed by the developer must receive CDOH approval before Phase I, excluding IA, II, and III are presented to the Town of Vail Design Review Board for final approval. 12. The east building including the two employee dwelling units shall be constructed when the parking structure is built to ensure that the employee units are built. 18.46.220 Employee Housing The development of SDD No. 4 will have impacts on available employee housing within the Upper Eagle Valley area. In order to help meet this additional employee housing need, the developer(s) of Areas A and D shall provide employee housing on site. The developer(s) of Area A shall build a minimum of 8 employee dwelling units within Area A Westhaven Condominium building, 3 within the Cornerstone Building and 2 within the Waterford Building. Each employee dwelling unit in the Westhaven Condominium Building shall have a minimum square footage of 648 square feet. Each employee unit in the Cornerstone Building shall have a minimum square footage of 600 square feet. There shall be a total of 2 employee dwelling units in the Waterford Building. One shall be a minimum of 300 square feet and the other a minimum of 800 square feet. The developer of Area D shall build 2 employee dwelling units in the Area D east building per the approved plan for the East Building. In Area D one employee dwelling unit shall have a minimum GRFA of 795 square feet and the second employee dwelling unit shall have a minimum GRFA of 900 square feet. The GRFA and number of employee units shall not be counted toward allowable density or GRFA for SDD No. 4. In Area A, the GRFA and number of employee dwelling units shall be restricted as employee dwelling units for 20 years plus the life of Tiffany Christine Lowenthal from the date of final certificate of occupancy for said units except those units in the Cornerstone and Waterford developments. The two employee dwelling units in Area D shall be restricted as rental employee dwelling units permanently. In Areas A & D the following restrictions shall apply to all employee dwelling units except for those 27 units in the Waterford and Cornerstone Buildings. The employee dwelling unit shall not be leased or rented for any period of less than 30 consecutive days, and that. if rented, it shall be rented only to tenants who are full time employees in the Upper Eagle Valley. The Upper Eagle Valley shall be deemed to include the Gore Valley, Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilman, Eagle-Vail, and Avon and their surrounding areas. A full time employee is a person who works an average of 30 hours per week. In Area A, if an employee dwelling unit is sold, it shall be sold only to a full time employee in the Upper Eagle Valley. The owner shall occupy the unit or lease/rent as per the requirements in this section. In Areas A & D the employee dwelling unit shall not be divided into any form of timeshare, interval ownership, or fractional fee ownership. A declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be filed on record in the office of the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder in a form approved by the Town Attorney for the benefit of the Town to ensure that the restrictions herein shall run with the land before a building permit is released for the construction of the employee units in either Area A or Area D. Before any building permits shall be released for either the Cornerstone or Waterford developments, the employee housing units shall be permanently restricted per the Town of Vail Housing Ordinance as follows: 1. The EHU shall have a parking requirement of one (1) on-site parking space and the EHU shall be located "on" the Town's bus route (as determined by the Town Zoning Administrator); 2. The EHU shall not be subdivided into any form of time shares, interval ownerships, or fractional fee; 3. The EHU shall be leased, but only to tenants who are full-time employees who work in Eagle County. The EHU shall not be leased for a period less than thirty (30) consecutive days. For the purposes of this Section, afull-time employee is one who works an average of a minimum of thirty (30) hours each week; 4. No later than February 1 of each year, the owner of the employee housing unit shall submit two (2) copies of a report (on a form to be obtained from the Community Development Department), to the Community Development Department of the Town of Vail and the Chairperson of the Town of Vail Housing Authority, setting forth evidence establishing that each tenant whom resides within the employee housing unit is a full-time employee in Eagle County; 5. This agreement shall be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's 28 ' Office. 18.46.230 Time Requirements SDD No. 4 shall be governed by the procedures outlined in Section 18.40.120 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Section 4. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 5. The repeal or the repeal and re-enactment of any provisions of the Vail Municipal Code as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceeding as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 6. All bylaws, orders, resolutions and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. The repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution or ordinance, or part thereof, heretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 5th day of January, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 2nd day of March, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 29 READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1993. . Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: 30 , • • `..r • • . - • s-r . , KOELDEL PROPEP.TY . !D,EVLLOP~•1L;1T J1RCr1 11 Vail-Rose ~ 12.370 acxet ~~art of. the SW 1/4 NC 1/4 of Section 12, Township,.',S South, RanSe 81 I~Jest of the 6th P.~1. , described as 'follows , Beginning at a point on the 1~1est line of said Sl~l 1/4 Nir• 1/4 from which the North one-quarter corner of said Section bears iJorth OJ15' East 22G9.48 feet; thence tiort`~ 0015` East, • along said •i9est.Line, 15~.3G feet to a point on the 5outi:~ust:e_!1 right of way line of.• U.S. 1}igh~.ay ilo. 6; thence, along said Soutyeaste:ly right of way line, as follotirs North S2o37' East 102.31 feet; " ~ North 49030' .Eaut, 519.57tfeet; and ~ ~ ~ ~ . • North 48°13' East, 5.19.09 feet, more oz less, to a point on the North line of said SW 1/4 NE 1/d; thence \orth 88°33' East, along the Nor~h line of said St•1 1/4 NE, 36S feet, mare or less, to a point on the centerl'ne of Gore Creek; thence, along the • centexlin~: 'of Gorc Creel:, as folloti~ts: ' South 3604?' t•Jest, 101.09 feet; • South 18021' htest, 54.08 fee*_; South .load' 19est, 20.02 feet; ~ South 12010' t•Jest, 110.25 feet; at~c South 28041' 1•;est, 2.12.35 feet, thence Sout:: ?5°15' West, 1064.10 feet to the point of begin:.?:•g. , Ttose i'~rccl ' 3.190 acrer 11 tract of land situ~tec in the St•i;i;E~ of Sec~ion 1'', .TP 5 5.', R. 81: W. , of ,the 5th P.;•1. , lying Southerly or that ce_~~in 'tract of land described in Book 199,,~1'aoe 197, horther?v and t•~este.rly of .'t}~e center line of Gore 'Creel;, and lying tlort:ierly and Easterly-oi those certain tracts described in Loot: 211 At Page 10G, DooJ: 211 at_• Page 108 and Dool: 215 at; Pnge 3G5, descri'~ed rss follotrs : ' . Beginning at a point on the 2dorth-Sout:z cen;.er line of said Section 12 whence the North quarter corner of said Section 12 begs 1}. OOo15' E. 2269.48 feet; thence N.. 75°15' E, 346.2;6 feet to the true point'of beginning, said point being on the South line of L•hat exact described in Boo}:,199,'.;"Page l97 and. which bears S. 08°26' E. 220a.3d feet from the ~lorth quarter corner of said Sec~ion 12; . thence N: ?5°15' E. 717.84 feet nlong the Southerly line of that tract described in Book 199, Fage 197 to the center of Gore~Creek; ~ • . thence S. ~28°41' W. 130.61 feet along the enter ling . of 5a id Creek; ' thence S. OS°24'30" E. 104.50 feet along the center line of 5nid Creeks: • thence S. 49°29' W. 95.50 feet Alang t'r.e center line ~of safd,,Creek; . thence 5. 2204' W. 129.rS7 feet along the center line ' of said ,Creek;. ~ , thence S. 54000' W. 119,.34 feet along the center tine of said Creekt~to the Southeast corner of that certain :race of lane], described., in: Dook 211, Page 100; • ~ thence •N: 33°1G' 30" 19. 140.12 Poet along the Easterly line of,~_that.tract described in nook 211 at page 108; ~ ~•thencc.N.''57042'30" 1,1. 169.88 feet along the Northeast•er,ly line"'.of thnt trnct described in Book 211 at page 108; ' thence ~N: ,,BG°02'30" ta. ~1G2.92'feet along the Northerly line of ,,those tracts described in Book 211 at Page 108 E3ook 211 ~nt Pngc lOG to;'n point; ' th~ncc N. 32057' 30" W. 76.08 feet along the Northeasterly line of that tract described in Boo}; 215 at Pnge . 3 G5, to the point of beg ~ nning'. 31 - ~ ' - , • co::Tl;:ui~a era n ' • J111 that part.of the St•);NI:!; •of Section 12, lyinc7 Southerly of , the cettiter of Core Cr'ee}', nB ishown' on the plst'on file in the office of the Eagle County Clezk and Recordez 'as Document ito. 97-t~9, described as follows: - ~ ~ • Beg inning at i:he Northeast corner of said St•l.t•lE~; thence South E9°33' test 131.67 feet to a point in tho'center of~~" • said Creek; thence .South 40°V9' t•)est 94.04 feet along the center of said Creek: thence South 113°21' test 54.Ot3 feet along the center of said Creer.: thence South 1°~4', West 205.02 feet along the center of said Cree'r.t. thenc.^_ South 1210' t,'est 110.25 feat along the center o` said C_ee};. thence South 2IIo41' teest 320.00 feet; 4~henc:~ South 3024'30" East, 170.00 feet along the'.center of said czecl:; thence Sout:: 27°00' 02" t•)est Q5.24 feet along the center of said tcr~~k; thence South 54000' West 259.31 feet along the center of said .thence South 55034' t~lest 109.62 feet along the center of said creek; ~ . thence South 6900•t' t~test 166.13 feet alono the center of said creek; thence 5out:~ fly°25` Z,test .6 t3. I3 t3 feet along the: center oz said creek; thence )lorth 7703 G' teest 2G.9G feet alone the center of said c=e_y; - thence north 50°33' t•:est 199.19 feet along the center of said czee}:; thence ?•tor~h 3Q°40` teest 239.09 feet along •the center oz said c_eek; thence Soutz 75°35' t•)est fl9.91 feet alo'narthe center of said c:aek; to z r,oint on the t•)esterly line of szid St•i:i•:E;; t;:~nce South Oo15' t•)est 4G1.90 f.ectr to the center of said Sect_cn 12s t:l•:encc ?north 09.02' L• ast 1302. G5 feet along thc. Southerly line of said St~;;i'i1r~ to the Sout:;cast corner of said St•i;t•1I:';; theme t•lorth 0°OG' East 1364,32 feeL• alora .tl:e Easterl..? li^~ of said SP1,iJ1:; to the Northeast corner oil snit St~i!si:Ej, the point of beginning, ~t)D . • The Nh',SE~ of Section 12, Township S South, Range fll l•lest of t::e 6th P.r1. ; , • - . ' All D ~ A1). that part of the SE;Ntal;' of Section 12, T~:rnship 5 South, Range • B1 teest of the Gt}i P.ri. , lying Southerly oi. the Southerly right of way line of U. S. Iligh:Yay No. 6, as sho~•m on `t'.ie plat on fi? c . in the of~ice of the Eagle County Cler}: and Recorder, as Document No. 979139, ::escribed as follows: ' Beginning at the Southeast corner of said SE;t)t~11; thence South fl9°02' West 436.95 feet along .the Southexly line of . said SE;Nta?z to n point on the Southerly right of way line of saki highway; thence Nort?~ 52035' East 1057.07 feet 'along the • So~.rtherly right of way line of said highway to a point on the Easterly line of said SE~;Nt91; ; • thence South 0°15' West 620.21 feet along the Easterly line of said ' 2; El;i`tt•); to the Southeast corner of said $E;NS•)~, the point of beginning) E};CEPT THE i OLLOWItJG : • • that pazt described in I3c~ok lEIEZ nt pac3e 545'; that part described in .Bcxok 191 a.t page 291; the*_ part described in Aool: 203 nt page 231; 32 , . ^ w • n a r ' „that paxt described in Dook 203 at page ,31~ ~ - ' that certain~~'i~s~l~.nd adjacent to the above-~3escr:;bed .propertf, and located in .the micelle oz -Gore Cre~?;, .whic;~ the parties intend to exclude fzcm this transac~ion;" ' Count}• c f Eag ' Statc of Colorado. ~ ~ . ~ . ~ .,Yr ~ + . • AL50. T}lE. FC)LLO:l1~~G PARCEL TOF~Ic.°.LY Y.NO~d;; A$ T{;E,"COSG;1Fi• PATLc~" - tract ~.of land situated in the SId 114 ?iS lI4 of ~::Se,ction.l2, Torashia S South, Ransp C31 'titest of ~tl~e Gth~1'rinci•,~al 1•leridian, 1~•in~ tdorthwcsterl~• ;,a f, thecenter line of Care CreeK oestribeo .es follo~:s • ~ De~innint at a ~ poin-~ whence the 1~orth Quarter Corner.;of :saic Section 1? hears 1.. ?1°G3' t~. ~-;:2292•.l7:feet; thence S. 6G°02'30" D. 5.50 feet; thence S. 54`42'30" L. l6°.Eb feet;. thenca ~ ~ S. 3s~lG'.3U" L. ]~0 12 ' ' - feet 'to ~ point i.. the center of. saio creek; thence S. G5~34' t;. 1Q9.6Z feet'a].orb the center ]ine of said creek; thence - 5. ; 69`(~~-' 1~:. ;'C~.7$ feet slonfi the C°PtcT 1 inr o{ laic; creek; thence 23~1Z'30" W. '31?.5~ fe_t to tl;e point of he~innin~, containing j .Q5 acres, morn o: lei=. ~ ~LSb DLSr~, i EAU • . ~ $e~innir.~ nt a ~:,;n~ td;,encN t}~f jac,rth Quzr~ef; ~ Corner of 5a?J 5cc~:iot; 2~ bears N. '4°03' aAl. 22~2.7~ fec+•t; tl~c*:ce S. g5°43'l4" •89.89 ~~:e,t; thencE 5. 5i~ 25'30" f.. 165.46 f cct; t:•~cnce S. '31°59'30'' E. 141.47 feet to a point in the. ,''center of said creek; thence S. 65`31'3b" t.'. ,](?.9.67 feet alons the center line of said tree:,; ther~c•e 'S. G9°U1'3G" t•J. 103.0? legit a]on~ t}sr cNrter line of said creek; thericr h. 23`2q'49" 1•:.. 5~ 5 . ! ~ r t to the psi nt of beFi nnin~.. - ' r `l, ~ 'TOCET1tL1;'.~,']Tti an ea r.etaent ar described in'Uocu~ri-,;, reco; ocd Avrvst S, It1~i~ in Eook 30G nt ~a~e 44:3 . , ,an~~ te.cordQd i:, ~c~t~K 3U7 bt P~gE lib •or Lhc: hx. ~ )r.vE:lE: (:puntY .1'eCOrC)S. , . ~ /ALSO including all water and well di~hts , ~ ~ ~,'apptirtcnpnt to the above de=Bribed propertyy~, ' incJuc'inc ~:ithovt litrit2tion, t-fe]; Fernit Ko. ~ ' 54702, ~:ater rights ciccrced in Civi) ,~c:ion 1(0. 2375 in La~lc Count~• District Court, and • sll that pc+rtio;, of t:ater rights c't~crccd in • C;~SN"J~o. ; C>a ~]0, Hater Div.isior, l.o. 5, . (CiorE plo. 1 dell - U.t~S ei'~) 33 r • \YI/ ti • • • ~ • , Jscede. Parcel ~ 1.2G0 acres • • County of Eagle and State of Colorado, to wit: I1 tract of land sa.tuatecl in tine St~~iJl:~~,of Section 17., To:unship 5 M South, nnnae S1 t•lest of the Gth Pziiiciaal J•)eridian, des=ribec] as tollo•.as: II~ginning at a point on the i)vrtls-Sout!~ center . line of said Section 12 whence the North.Quarter Corner of saiC Section l2 bears Nort)1 00 dogs, l5 mires. East 22G9.4fl feet: thence . tlozth 75 deos. 15 mires. East 3~1G.2~ feet; thence Sovth 32 dogs. 57 mires. 30 secs. East 7G.OF3 feet; thence South 11~ dogs. 00. mires. 30 secs. 1~est 279,gg feet to•a poir'rt ir1 l•he center~of Gore'Creek;• thence t~ortli 50 legs, 32 mires. 1•rzst• 11.1.31 feet aloha the centA-° •a- line of said creek; thence north 3E3 dens. 40 mires. l•sest 239.09 feet along t!ye center like of said creek,; thence • South.s7G.;degs.'~"~ 35 minx. lest fl9.91 feet along the center line'of said>'creek• to 'a ' point on '~l~e Nortlz-South center line of said Section :12; thence Nor~h 00 ciegs. 1S mires. East 13.95 fe.t along tli'e :North=South s.` . center line of said Section 13 to the poi>>t of beginning. , Total 1G.820. ac=es • • , GOaE CREW}: ASSCCI~TES FP.OPERTY llEVwLOp~1L::'r 11R%1S $ r C 6 D °80.700 acres • Leoal Desc~_otion ' 1111 that part of Section 12, Toti.;nship 5 South, Aance fll Nest; of • the Gth P.:•). , described as foil (::s 1111 that par of the N';NE's of Section. 12, lying Southerly of the Southerly right-of-~yay line of U.S. 'kkigh•.aay tto. ,6 and Northerly • of the Sou~h,rly line o£ said i~t;~sE;, as shown on the plat on file, in the office of the Eagle County Clex}: and Recorder as Docume.^.t i1o. 974G9, described as folloti•:s: ~ Eeainning aL- the highway survey monumenL• at the intersection of the Southerly line of said highway and the Easterl}• line of said k) ;!dE ~ , whence the 23ortheast corner of 'said Section 12 bears Nor~h 0003' hest °34.745 feet; ~ ~ ~ , thence South 7302G'30" West 1112.13 feet along the Southerly xight ' e~: way line of said highway; ~ thence South 70034' West 125.10 feet along the Southerly; right of L:ay line cf said highways ~ • ~chence South 69°25' Vsest 100,00 feet along: the Southerly right of a~r3y line of said highwaY1 , . ~:.lience South G5o50' Ytes t 1.00.00 feet along the Southerly line of vaid highways •f~hence South 62015' West 100.00 feet along the Southerly• right of a:ay line of said highway; . ;.hence Sou':h 58°40' West 100.00 feet along the Southerly right of ~,;ay l.ne of said highway i r~henc~ South 55°05' West 100.00 feet along the Southerly right of way line of said highways ~ thence South 51032' West 100.00 feet along the Southerly. right of •r:ay ~.'ne of said highway; 'r then~~ South 47057' West 232•Sfl feet along the Southerly right of way :'nr? of Said highway to a point on the Southerly line'of•'said ~ • ,1t;NE ; hence 1~ortkl OD°33' East 497•G7 feet along the Southerly line of • aaid 1JSjtsE; to the center of the NEk of said Section 123 thence t~ortli 86°33' East 1379.35 feet along the Southerly 1.Lne of said 1~;idL; to the Southeast corner of said t1;t~E;; theme 1larth 0°03' West 7G0.951 Feet: along the, Easterly. line of said . tat;t•)E; to its in±crsection with the Southerly line of said • hig.:ray, the point o£ beg inning,- . 34 RESOLUTION NO. 3 SERIES 1993 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 1993-1997 TOWN OF VAIL TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, the Town of Vail has developed a transit development plan for the purpose of outlining the transportation needs of the Town of Vail for the next five (5) years. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado that: 1. The Transit Development Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted. 2. The Town Manager and the Town staff are hereby authorized to take all actions necessary to implement the 1993-1997 Town of Vail Transit Development Plan. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela A. Brandmeyer, Acting Town Clerk C:\RESOLU93.3 s RECEtVEa MAR - 9 1993 DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL . STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE GREG HALL MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCHOLL CAROLINE FISHER JIM HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX DD DETO: LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER KEN HUGHEY JODY DOSTER MANUEL MEDINA ~ILE JANEIL TURNBULL MARY LAWRENCE MEMORANDUM T0: LARRY GRAFEL, ACTING-TOWN MANAGER FROM: ACTING-DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: MARCH 8, 1993 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 8 - 12, 1993 STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Construct various signs: a. Village loading signs for core. b. 4-Way to Gold Peak, handicap skier service signs. c. 2 "Caution-Falling Debris/Use at Own Risk" for underpass at Aspen Lane and install at both ends. d. Miscellaneous signs as determined by Engineer. e. "Parking in designated spaces...etc." 2. Remove garland throughout Town as needed. 3. Patch potholes throughout Town. PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1. Replace insulation in attic at Muni. Bldg. 2. Adjust doors to ADA standards. 3. Correct fire code violations. 4. Begin construction of VTC locker room. 5. Plug water leak at VTC electrical room. CARPENTERS A. 1. Repair signs. 2. Construct Public Work's restroom remodel. 3. Construct gate boxes. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Follow up with fire code violations. 2. Repair interrogation room outlet. 3. Repair fixture at main stairs of VTC. PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 ~ ELECTRICIANS (CONTINUED) A. 4. Wire connection for new gate. 5. Wire electrical for Public Work's restroom remodel. 6. Replace exit lights at Council Chambers. 7. Move electrical outlets at Library. 8. Repair outlet in Municipal Building. 9, Repair water leak in electrical room - disconnect VTC. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Complete planting plan for Dowd Junction Recreation Path. 2. Begin design work on Gore Creek Promenade/Pedestrian Bridge. 3. Hire consultant for Mill Creek/Ted Kindel Park. 4. Check point to point radio communication from Potato Patch to East and West Vail. LG/dsr a. - EXHIBIT A . - r-, - - . , , . b j. ~ .T-RA1\1SlT~ DE-`VEL~OPME:NT: ~ .-:PLAN IJ PDA`TE . . ~ y 9:93 ._1.997. ~ ~ , Town -of Vaia , ~Vai~l.;~ Colorado . , _ . . Felsbu~~ .Hoot 8t~aJ1lev~:g . ~ ~ . ~ . February 1:993 t Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 VAIL TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE ' 1993 - 1997 Prepared for; ' Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road ' Vail, Colorado 81657 Prepared by: ' Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 5299 DTC Boulevard, Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80111 FHU Reference No. 92-011 ' February, 1993 ' Town of Vail Vail Transft Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Page INTRODUCTION 1 I. TRANSIT SYSTEM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2 ' II. COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS 3 III. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 6 A. Town of Vail Bus System 6 B. County-Wide Bus System (Town of Avon) 14 C. Paratransit Service : 15 D. Private Transportation Operators . 15 IV. FIVE-YEAR RIDERSHIP FORECASTS 19 V. EVALUATION OF EXISTING SERVICES 22 ' A. Outlying Route Service• • • • • ' • , • . • • 22 B. In-Town Shuttle 24 C. Paratransit Service 25 D. Administrative Operations 25 VI. EVALUATION OF SERVICE ALTERNATIVES 30 ' A. Fixed Guideway Alternative -Optimal Monorail 30 B. At-Grade High Capacity Bus System 33 C. In-Town Shuttle Recommendations/Priorities 33 VII. OPERATIONS PLAN 35 A. Service Operations : : 35 B. Capital Acquisition/Replacement 35 C. Financial Plan ..................................................37 ' APPENDIX -TOWN OF VAIL BUS ROUTE SCHEDULE Town of Vail i 1 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES 1 Page 1. Vicinity Maps ........................................................4 2. West Vail Bus Routes 7 ' 3. East Vail Bus Routes 8 4. In-Town Shuttle Bus Route 9 1 5. 1991 Monthly Ridership 1 I ' 6. Town of Vail Annual Transit Ridership 20 7. 1991 In-Town Shuttle Daily Boardings 26 1 8. In-Town Shuttle Peak Hour Demand 27 9. Department of Public Works and Transportation Organization 29 ' 10. In-Town Shuttle Alternatives Analysis 31 1 1 1 1 1 Town of Vail Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES 1 Pa>=e ' 1. Town of Vail 1991 Transit Statistics l0 2. Town of Vail Transit Fleet 12 ' 3. Annual Operating Costs 14 4. Transportation Provider Inventory 16 5. Projected Annual Transit Ridership 1993-1997 21 ' 6. 1991 Town of Vail Transit Performance Measures 23 7. Comparison of In-Town Shuttle Alternatives 32 ' 8. Bus Replacement Schedule 36 9. Town of Vail Bus Fleet at End of 1997 36 10. Capital Improvement and Operations Financing Plan 38 ' Town of Vail ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Introduction INTRODUCTION The Transit Development Plan (TDP) is a planning tool which lays out a five year program for implementation and operation of a transit system. The TDP incorporates an analysis of existing ' conditions, identification of transit needs, development of alternatives to meet future transit demand, and the selection of a preferred alternative. The TDP also presents an analysis of the administrative and fiscal operations of the system. The Town of Vail's last TDP update covered the 1988-1992 time frame. The TDP update presented here addresses the subsequent 5 year time frame through 1997. This report was prepared in accordance with Undatin¢ a Transportation Development Pro¢ram for Rural and Small Urban Areas ' published by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), January, 1990. The CDOT document provides guidelines for updating an existing TDP. This TDP update report is organized into 7 sections which correspond to the 7 tasks outlined in the CDOT guidelines which include: t o Goals and Objectives o Community Characteristics ' o Existing Transportation Services o Five Year Ridership Forecasts o Evaluation of Existing Services o Evaluation of Service Alternatives ' o Operations Plan This TDP update also incorporates a paratransit plan developed in response to the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This Act assures that persons with disabilities are provided the same level of transit service as persons who are not disabled. Paratransit and ADA information presented in this TDP update, as well as some other information regarding local transit service, was extracted from A Joint Paratransit Plan, June, 1992, prepared by The Transit Expert, Inc. ' Town of Vail Page 1 Vail Transk Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter I I. TRANSIT SYSTEM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following highlight the goals and objectives of Vail's transit system which have been developed as a part of the overall Vail Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The TMP was developed under the direction and guidance of the Vail Parking and Transportation Advisory Committee. Public input was collected through an extensive series of meetings and interviews with citizens and community leaders. The goals are as follows: o Accommodate projected increases in future ridership anticipated from ski expansion and other development. ' o Provide an alternative transportation mode other than the automobile to reduce parking demand in Vail Village and Lionshead, and decrease vehicle emissions for improved air quality in the Vail Valley. o Provide routine transit service which would accommodate disabled persons per the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). t o Assure that cost-efficient service is being provided to areas warranting transit service. o Coordinate the Vail bus system to operate in conjunction with other local and regional transit ' services. o Provide sufficient transit capacity to accommodate demand during peak periods of the year and peak hours of the day. The In-Town shuttle, which provides service within central Vail between Vail Village and Lionshead, is a critical element in Vail's transit system and has unique operating characteristics. Several additional objectives have been established specifically for this route: o Improve operations at the physical bottlenecks along the route. o Identify a realistic, locally accepted concept plan to accommodate increasing passenger demands in the future. ' o Maintain a high quality transit service while being sensitive to the quality and character of the pedestrian areas along the In-Town shuttle route. ' Town of Vail Page 2 1 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter it II. COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS The Town of Vail is located in Eagle County approximately 100 miles west of Denver. The town lies in a narrow valley and extends approximately ten mites in an east-west direction, but is only one-half mile in width. Interstate 70 runs along the valley and provides access to the town via three interchanges. Given Vail's confined width, the interstate tends to be a barrier separating development along the north side and south side of the Valley. Figure 1 shows the location of Vail and a general ' layout of the town. Tourism is the primary industry in Vail. Downhill skiing during the winter months is Vait's biggest attraction, although summer recreation activity is also significant. As a resort community, the ' population varies considerably throughout the year with visitors and part-time residents comprising most of the population during peak tourist seasons. Typically, the population is greatest during the peak winter season at which time demand for community facilities and services, including transit, is ' at a maximum. Being a resort community, the population of Vail fluctuates by season. Currently, there are nearly ' 4,000 permanent year-round residents who live in Vail. During peak ski season, the overnight population can increase to as high as 19,000 people with the addition of tourists and seasonal employees. Add to this an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 day skiers/visitors who come to town, and the total at-one-time population is estimated to reach 30,000 people during peak season and even more ' during the peak days. It is estimated that the mountain can accommodate up to 24,000 skiers per day. Vail's disabled population is not considered to be substantial. No specific information is available as ' to the number of persons residing in Vail who are "ADA paratransit eligible", but The Transit Expert, Inc. has estimated that there are 13 Vail residents who meet the criteria. There are no estimates of ADA eligible tourists visiting Vail, but many of the paratransit trips that have taken place over the past year have been primarily visitor-based. Much of Vail's employment occurs in and around the major activity centers; Vail Village, Lionshead Village, and the West Vail area. Vail Village and Lionshead Village are located just south of the Main ' (Central) Vail interchange onto Interstate 70 and together comprise the central Vail "core". This area is where most skiers access the mountain. In addition, there is approximately 650,000 square feet of commercial space, office space, and lodging, located in Vail and Lionshead Villages. During the peak ' winter months, approximately 2,600 employees work in the core area performing service duties and ski-related functions. The West Vail area, located immediately north of the West Vail interchange onto Interstate 70, is a more conventional commercial center. Several fast food restaurants and service stations are located in West Vail along with the town's only supermarket and other retail shops. During the peak winter season, approximately 300 employees work in the West Vail area. There are several transportation corridors through town that converge on the central Vail area: East Vail, West Vail north of the freeway, and West Vail south of the freeway. Frontage roads along ' Interstate 70 provide the means of access to these corridors. Towards the east, the Frontage Road serves primarily residential development along both sides of Interstate 70. Approximately 1,300 dwelling units are located east of central Vail. In addition to residential development, the Frontage Road (along with Vail Valley Drive) serves the Vail Gotf Course and Ford Park. ' Town of Vail Page 3 F E L S B U R G H 0 L T & U L L E V I G SANDSTONE i ~°ad Main Vail East Vail g lnterchange lnterchange `°~~a e Road East ~°t`r F 9e Road LIOLLAGE D VAIL FORD Fr0~la9 COURSE q~9,S ~a VILLAGE PARK o~ CASCADE ~qo WEST Jar VILLAGE o'o, VAIL 5° EAST ~\,O west Vail VAIL lnterchange SKI AREA x'10 Approximate Scale in Miles 0~ ~ 19 ~ p ElaenKOwer ~ IDANO Tueee7 \ r $PRINOS ~o ~ VAIL Pao Jr GEORGETOWN DENVER EAGLE AVON ~ 7 L MINTURN DILLON OLENWOOD FRI$CO $PRINO$ ® v BRECKENRIDOE Approximate Scale in Miles o j~~ 1 1 0 25 50 Figure 1 V~ Vicintiy Maps North ~ ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter II To the west of central Vail, there are two distinct corridors which are separated by Interstate 70; both primarily made up of residential development and served by freeway frontage roads. Approximately 700 dwellings exist along the north side of I-70 in addition to the town's post office and commercial activity near the West Vail interchange. The southern corridor contains about 680 units, a few commercial establishments, and aski-lift area (Cascade Village) located west of Lionshead Vi((age. In addition to these "radial" corridors, there is also a major transit corridor located within central Vail. The In-Town shuttle provides service within the "core" area, and travels from the eastern edge of the Vail Village area to the western edge of Lionshead Village. The Shuttle provides linkage between the ski lifts, parking garages, commercial and office use, lodging, and several community centers. The In-Town shuttle is heavily used during peak winter season and alone makes up approximately three- , fourths of the patronage riding Vail's bus system. ' Town of Vail Page 5 i ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter III III. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Transportation services within the Vail Valley are provided by several public entities and many private and specialized operators. The Town of Vail provides free service within town which covers East Vail, West Vail, and the central Vail area. The Town of Avon operates acounty-wide bus system in which three routes serve Vail. One route runs between Leadville and Vail while the other two run to/from the Avon area; specifically the Beaver Creek ski area and the Town of Edwards. There are also numerous private operators which include local taxi service, school buses, lodging services, and transportation to Denver, other ski areas, and the Eagle County Airport. A. TOWN OF VAIL BUS SYSTEM ' The Town of Vail provides free fixed route transit service, 20 hours per day, 365 days per year, to the general public that thoroughly covers the Vail Valley. During peak periods of the winter season, up to 7 separate bus routes provide the necessary coverage. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the current bus routes for West Vail, East Vail, and the In-Town shuttle during peak periods. A bus schedule is shown in the Appendix. ' During the winter peak hours of the day, buses run every 15 to 20 minutes along the West Vail North, West Vail South, and Sandstone routes. The Golf Course and Ford Park buses run every 30 minutes and the East Vail express runs every l5 minutes throughout the day and every 30 minutes in the late ' evening. There is no formal schedule for the In-Town shuttle; buses continually run along this route at headways of 7 to 10 minutes. During peak hours of demand, up to 14 buses may be pressed into service along this route. ' During the summer and "in between" seasons, transit service is scaled back since passenger demand is significantly less. Bus headways along the outlying routes are typically an hour long. In West Vail, the West Vail North and Sandstone routes are combined into a single route and Ford Park is served as a part of the Golf Course route resulting in a total of 5 "formalized" bus routes serving the town including the In-Town Shuttle. Service is provided 14 hours per day in the summer with the first buses making runs by 6:00 A.M. and the last run ending after 10:00 P.M. Service is suspended for a ' 2 hour duration during the early afternoons. During the 1991 calendar year, 3.2 million patrons rode Vail's bus system with the In-Town shuttle accommodating over 70 percent of total ridership. Table 1 summarizes overall operations for 1991. As shown, buses accumulated well over half-a-million miles and nearly 61,000 hours of service during 1991. Transit use varied significantly during the year as illustrated in Figure 5. The peak season typically occurs during March, and the peak summer activity on average is only one-third that during the winter. The peak day of the year occurred on December 31st in which over 43,000 patrons were recorded boarding the town bus system. Town of Vail Page 6 F E L S B U R G H 0 L T & U L L E V I G 1 RED SANDSTONE ROAD 0 Winter service to this area YAA YE: W DRIVE provided via separate ~e Sandstone Route as it currently exists. ~ e SANDSTONE ` CREEK CLUB p . ~ IfFHH GH[EK ~ IIMB[N e POST RIDOE SIMBA Q OFFICE 1 RUN yAK, RU BREAKAWAY WEST RED SANDSTONE ROAD _ - J ~ VEDESTRIAN OVERPASS • 1.Br1 7~ VUI. DAS SCHONE 7777 On~* ' SAFE WAY • RED SANDSTONE SCHOOL Gra WEST VALL N N tNef'P } y INTER>I iAT T NTFpa TATE 7p '~~H•. DAYS INN MALL / f ~ 4`/~~~ 0 EA ~aT TO/FROM V T C PAIL PROFESSIONAL WESTRAVEN BUM.DINO - ~ DRIVE e MAT iERHOHN CASCADE TO/FROM V.i.C ~J t1.0~'~ ~ VILLAGE ••We fwd s~ ~i •O. I;HAMONIM-FRONTAGE 0' ~ On+ CONCERT ~J PTANMIGAN e HALL PLAZA srREAMSIDE fps'•~..... pt RESORT LIONSHEAD • Qore Creek UNDERPASS iNTERMOUNTAiN INTERMOUNTAIN BRIDGE ~ W O D \DnTC MEADOW CREEK Legend West Vail South - - West Vail North Sandstone • BUS StOpS (NAME AT STOP) Figure 2 West Vail Bus Routes Not To Scale F E L S B U R G ~oLr & ULLEVI G, FALLS of vAU- VAII MOUNTAIN • • SCHOOL p, - ~ - - ~ ~ INTERa rATE 70 ?NE - ~ ST 4}'~ INTERSTATE 70 EAa i \ \ - - ~ ' N LANE ASPE ' ----FRONTAL; • E ROAD ~ .....................•,.--------------`-'c- EAST VAIL PIi KIN CHEEK PARK • • FORD PARK :AIL EAST CONUOS - • • LAJPINE~ C LUMBINE/81GHORN ROAD t616 SUNBURST DRIVE • GOLF CLUB HOUSE BIGHORN ROAD • MANOR VAIL ~ • • v&//gy 0 • SIDE CIRCLE - e~'®ho, • yell STREAM 0~~~•,..•..........-••' Streemside,~`.~ ` -Road ~ FR FIELD ~ teas vAIL vAiLEV [~RwL C?rcie East ~ .ht~tttNPLAn MAINGORE~ PTARMIGAN • ~ JUN{PEH ROAD WEST ~ TARMIGAN ~ •VAIL RACQUET ~ ROAD EAST TIMBER FALLS CLUB BIGHORN ' • ~ ~ PARK ~ r ~ MOUNTAIN MEADOWS;`. O i C Sc ~ ~ m Legend a ~ ' ~ • East Vail Express Route MEADOW LANE EAST McBene . Goff CourselFord Park Bus Route BUS StOpS (NAME OF STOP1 Figure 3 East Vail Bus Routes Not to Scale ~ F E L S B U R G H 0 L T & U L L E V I G _ [IV1 ERSTATE 70 EgST S FRONTAGE ROgp INTERSTATE 70 WEST t t 1 ~ r.uNCER~r IJAU STOP ~ • P[ nzA ~ 1 ~j i [Il)N.`~IUnI~InflrlNl~ Q ~ ~ SI HII(, IIII/E. CROSSRUApS LIONSNEAD MALL ~:'>;y_ Pl AZP ry,1:~! r ~ ~M • ~ 1r+ ..T... HADDISSON RESORT MEDICAL O ~[)UBSON ICE ~ • CENTER r,HVSSH Ff~ • ARENA r «..,w1~ ~ • MAIL THA[JSF'OR iA iIUU CE4f"r_P vAIL FIRE i DEPARTMENT ~ ~;,i w.,r 1.~5. • I COVERED BRIDGE ~ VAIL VILLAGE ~ I I Legend ~ •i ~ L~~~~~~ ~L~ ~ Restricted Auto Areas - Limited Auto Access GOLDEN BEAK • • BUS StOp$ (NAME OF STOP) Figure 4 Not to Scale /n-Town Shutt/e Bus Route ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter III TABLE 1 TOWN OF VAIL 1991 TRANSIT STATISTICS Total . Serv~ce,Area Ridership Vehicle Miles:. Vehicle Hours In-Town Shuttle 2,251,017 224,658 31,969 West Vail (1) 612,758 150,908 12,535 East Vail (2) 381,176 l 92, ] 95 15,175 ' ~ Totals I 3,244,951 I 601,251 I 60,872 (1) Includes West Vail North and South, Sandstone, and West Vail Link. (2) Includes service to East Vail, golf course, and Ford Park. Source: Town of Vail. The Town of Vail currently operates a fleet of 34 vehicles. Table 2 lists the attributes of each vehicle. ' A total of 17 vehicles or 50 percent of the fleet are at least 10 years old whereas the remaining 17 vehicles were purchased within the past three years. A total of 15 buses are scheduled for replacement between 1994 and 1996. The most recent purchases (buses 195, 196, and 197) are perimeter-seating buses and are equipped with a wheelchair lift making them ADA accessible ' (discussed in a later chapter). There are currently four vehicles in the fleet which are equipped to load and unload wheelchairs which include a l2 seat mini bus used for paratransit service. Operation of Vail's bus system is funded entirely from the Town's General Fund which is subsidized by a local sales tax. The bus system is free to riders, so no revenue is generated through fares. Some revenue is generated from advertisements placed on the sides of buses, but these monies are deposited directly into the Town's General Fund. In the past, the Town has received some UMTA (Urban Mass Transportation Administration) funding used towards the purchase of new buses. i i 1 1 Town of Vail Page 10 FE L SBURG 700 H 0 L T & U L L E V I G I ; 600 .,~~x-~ 500 ~ ~ - • :i •k'~ Y.. . X ; 400 • x:~K`: . ~ tq - y„ r~ ~ ~ 0 300 NX x:'`~`; ~•n~~~~ to ~ X; ~ C :~.X> v ; y.., > n :4.^ r~ 200 3 ; . 100 C,!\~.Xn, .•:~y:^. 'nil°~ ' i~:'~,.` .%ni~X . "'~f ~ J ,CX"~. fir; r'~ i~, i. ` ~.t' ) ~ JAN ^ `I v MAR I MAY JUL I SEP ~ NOV I FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC Month V ~ Figure 5 Source: Town of Vail 1991 Month/y R%dErShip N/ort~h ~ ' Vail Transit Development Plan U date, 1993-1997 Cha ter III P P ' TABLE 2 TOWN OF VAIL TRANSIT FLEET (1) Expected Replacement `Unit No :Year Description .Seats Mileage (1} Year 151 1982 TMC 31 113,444 1994 ' 152 1982 TMC 3l 170,000 1994 153 1982 TMC 31 179,826 1994 ' 154 1982 TMC 31 183,667 1994 155 1982 TMC 31 118,197 1994 ' 156 1982 TMC 31 164,516 1995 157 1982 TMC 31 166,232 1995 ' 158 1982 TMC 31 I 163,304 1995 159 1982 TMC 31 I 201,704 I 1995 160 1982 TMC 31 ~ 107,989 ~ 1995 161 1982 TMC 31 ~ 174,612 1996 ' 162 1982 TMC 31 ~ 185,491 1996 163 1982 I TMC I 31 I 189,795 ( 1996 ' 164 1982 I TMC I 3l I 184,760 I 1996 165 1982 I TMC I 3l I 216,042 I 1996 ' 166 1981 I GMC I 21 I 28,618 167 (2) 1990 I CHEVY I 12 I 35,030 181 1982 I ORION ( 35 I 78,637 I 1995 182 I 1989 I ORION I 39 I 82,785 I ' 183 I 1989 I ORION I 39 I 82,842 ( I 184 I 1989 ~ ORION ( 39 I 73,008 185 I 1989 I ORION I 39 I 83,432 186 ! 1989 ~ ORION ~ 39 I 85,022 ' 187 I 1989 ~ ORION I 39 I 27,182 188 I 1990 I ORION I 39 I 57,822 ' Town of Vail Page 12 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter III TABLE 2 TOWN OF VAIL TRANSIT FLEET (1) Expected Replacement ' Unit: Na Year Description Seats Miteage (1) Year 189 1990 ORION 39 44,682 ' 190 1990 ORION 39 56,341 191 1991 ORION 39 39,221 ' 192 1991 ORION 39 35,962 193 1991 ORION 39 41,075 ' 194 1991 ORION 39 38,307 195 (2) 1992 ORION I 37 2,000 ' 196 (2) 1992 ORION I 37 2000 197 (2) 1992 ORION I 37 2000 ' (I) As of May 28, 1992 (2) ADA accessible (contains a wheelchair lift). Unit 167 is used for paratransit service. Units 195, 196, and 197 have perimeter seating arrangement. Sources: Town of Vail and A Joint Paratransit Plan, prepared by The Transit Expert, ' Inc., June, 1992. ' Town of Vail Page 13 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Cha ter III P Operating costs of Vail's transit system range from $1.5 million to $2.0 million annually. Table 3 illustrates the actual 1991 costs and the budgeted costs for 1992. As shown, costs to operate the In- Town Shuttle make up 40 to 50 percent of the annual cost to operate the entire system. The West Vail bus routes together make up approximately 24 percent of the operating costs, and East Vail routes make up 18 to 20 percent of the costs. Administrative costs comprise 12 to 13 percent of the total. TABLE 3 ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS (In $1,000) _ _ _ , .Item Actual' '1991 Cost: Budgeted 1992: Costs ' In-Town Shuttle^.. 794 791 ' West Vail Routes (1) 341 453 East Vail Routes (2) 296 369 ' Administrative 191 245 Paratransit 10 ' Host Service (3) - 6 Totals 1,622 1,874 ' (1) Includes West Vail North, West Vail South, and Sandstone routes. (2) Includes East Vail Express, Golf Course, and Ford Park routes. ' (3) Host service includes the labor required for orderly passenger boarding at locations which experience significant loading demand. Source: Town of Vail. B. COUNTY-WIDE BUS SYSTEM (TOWN OF AVON) The Town of Avon, with participation from the Town of Vail and Beaver Creek Resort, operates a ' regional transit service which carried approximately I million passengers in 1991. Service is provided to Leadville, Red Cliff, Minturn, Edwards, Avon, Beaver Creek Resort, and Vail. Ridership associated with Vail accounts for 20 to 25 percent of the entire system's ridership. There are three routes which stop at the Transportation Center; one serving the US 24 corridor including Minturn, Red Cliff, and Leadville; one serving Beaver Creek Resort and Avon; and one serving development along US 6 as far west as Edwards. Each passenger is charged a $2.00 fee for one-way service along ' these routes. Patrons heading to or coming from Leadville are charged $3.25. Approximately 85 percent of the Vail patronage on this system are oriented to/from Eagle Valley. Town of Vail Page 14 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter III C. PARATRANSIT SERVICE ' In May, 1991, the Town began providing free paratransit service. The Town owns one van (unit 167) containing a wheelchair lift and two wheelchair tie downs. The service is available during all hours that the fixed route service is operating, and reservations for its use require 24-hour advance notice. For riders traveling outside of Vail, service has been coordinated with that of the Avon/Beaver Creek system such that passengers get transferred at either the Vail Transportation Center or the Chamonix North Frontage Bus Shelter. During the first 12 months of the service (through April, 1992), a total of 131 passenger-trips were provided. Within the 12 month period the service operated 28 days in which the Town's van ' accumulated 651 miles. Approximately 95 percent of these trips took place during the non-ski season, and over one-half (55 percent) of these trips occurred during the months of May and June. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 extends civil rights protection to persons with disabilities. In terms of its affect on transit service, persons with disabilities must be provided equivalent service to persons who are not disabled. The following highlight the requirements of the act as related to bus service in Vail. ' o All newly purchased or leased vehicles used for fixed route service must be accessible, i.e., contain a wheelchair lift. ' o All newly purchased or leased vehicles used for demand responsive service must be accessible unless comparable paratransit service is being provided. ' o Separate paratransit service is to be provided within three-quarters of a mile from all fixed route service (within Town limits) to persons who are unable to use accessible fixed-route buses. In light of the ADA, continuation of paratransit service to the entire Town will be required. D. PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION OPERATORS Table 4 shows a listing of the other transportation operators providing service within Vail. ' Town of Vail Page 15 ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TABLE 4 TRANSPORTATION PROVIDER INVENTORY Type of Number of ' ' ' Fare ;Number of .:Company I , . ©peratioR , I VeMcies - ~ Setvice Area I MouCS of Ope~tlorr ' I Sphedule , ~ . ' Employees Airport Shuttle Taxi Service 2 Vans Pickup Door to Door Departure Times from Vail One-Way Admin - 1 Vans and TRC to Denver 7:00 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. and $29.00 Drivers/Maint - 2 2:30 P.M. - 5:30 P.M. Airport Taxi Service 15 Vans Vail Valley/Avon/ Running 24 Hours a Day 13 One-Way Admin - 7 Transportation Edwards/Denver Trips to Denver Daily $35.00 Drivers - 22 Service Airport Maint - 1 Christie Lodge Timeshare 3 Vans Vail Valley/Avon Only Generally Only VIP upon No Charge Admin - 3 Condo Airport for VIPs Request Drivers - 2 Maint - 1 Colorado Taxi Service 26 Vans Vail -Denver Airport 5:45 A.M. - 9:15 P.M. Daily One-Way Admin - 15 Mountain Charters Also During Peak Periods - 24 $30.00 Drivers - 35 Express Hours a Day Maint - 2 Eagle County School Buses 2 Suburbans Vail/Avon/Red Cliff/ 6:00 A.M. - 9:30 A.M. and N/A Admin - 2 School District 4 Vans Gypsum/Bums/ 2:00 P.M. - 5:00 P.M. Drivers - 34 40 Buses McCoy/Eagle/Edwards Maint - 3 Eagle Point Timeshare 1 Van Ski Runs to Lionshead 8:00 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. Ski No Charge Drivers - 2 Condos Transportation Center Runs and 3:45 - 4:30 P.M. Pickup Skiers Holiday Inn Hotel 2 Vans Everywhere in Vail 6:00 A.M. - 11:00 P.M. No Charge Admin - 2 Valley Driver - 15 Maint - 3 Piney River Resort 4 Vans Pickup from Hotels to 9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. No Charge Drivers - 2 Ranch Take on Tours for Van Service Charge $45.00 for Tours Raintree Inn Hotel 1 Van LHTRC/TRC -Other 7:15 A.M. - 11:00 A.M. or No Charge Admin - 4 Places in Vail Upon Call Otherwise Drivers - 5 Request Maint - 1 TABLE 4 TRANSPORTATION PROVIDER INVENTORY I Type of Number of " Fare Number a4 Company Operation Vehicles . Service Area: {•(ours' of QperaUan Sbhedule' employees . 1 Resort Taxi Service 6 Vans Vail/Beaver Creek/ 5:00 A.M. - 1:00 A.M. (BCT) $31.00 - Admin - 5 (BCT) Express Shuttle Mintum/Avon Pickup at 6 Trips per Day to Denver Denver $1 Drivers - 105 (BCT) 34 Buses TRC/LHTRC/Sandstone (Shuttle) Each Way Maint - 11 (BCT) BCT School/C Point Charlie/ (BCT) Admin - 2 (Shuttle) Vail Hi/Safeway Drivers - 5 (Shuttle) Maint - 1 (Shuttle) Roost Lodge Hotel 1 Bus TRC and Back 8:00 A.M. - 10:00 P.M. Every No Charge Admin - 4 Hour Drivers - 3 Maint - 3 Sandstone Timeshare 2 Vans Anywhere in Vail Upon 8:00 A.M. - 10:00 P.M. No Charge Admin - 2 Creek Club Request Drivers - 4 Maint - 2 Simba Run Short Term 2 Vans Simba Run to LHTRC 7:30 A.M. - 11:00 P.M. - No Charge Drivers - 4 Resort Condo Rental and TRC LHTRC/TRC -Safeway Anytime After 5:00 P.M. Upon Request Spraddle Resort 1 Bus Pickup for Tours from 8:30 A.M. - 5:15 P.M. -Does Included in Admin - 1 Creek Ranch Marriott/TRC/Concert 2 Tours per Day. If no Price of Tour Drivers - 2 Hall Plaza Riders are Needed then ft Doesn't Run Streamside at Timeshare 4 Vans Daytime - 8:00 A.M. - 5:30 P.M. No Charge Drivers - 14 Vail LHTRC/Antlers Maint - 1 Safeway/Restaurants Upon Request VTRC and LHTRC 5:30 P.M. - 11:00 P.M. Vail Run Timeshare 2 Vans Vail Run to LHTRC to 6:00 A.M. - 9:30 P.M. Winter No Charge Drivers - 3 Resort Golden Peak and VTRC Summer Upon Request TABLE 4 TRANSPORTATION PROVIDER INVENTORY Type of Nummber of 'F'are Number ai : . Company Operatioq - Vehicles::: Service AreA H4ht5 of Operation -Schedule' Employees Vans to Vail Taxi Service 26 Vans Vail/BC to Denver 6:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. Once Vail-Denver Admin - 5 Private Pickups Upon an Hour from Vail to Denver $35.00 Each Drivers - 34 Request. Way $39.00 on Saturday During Summer: $30.00 8:00 A.M. - 11:00 P.M. Every Each Way Vail/Denver Half Hour from Denver to B/C Avon - and BC/Denver will Vail/BC During Ski Season Denver $37.00 Run 5 to 10 Times Only Each Way Each Way $39.00 on Saturday Westin Hotel Hotel 3 Vans LHTRC/TRC 7:00 A.M. -Midnight No Charge Admin - 2 Drivers - 10 Maint - 1 Westwind Owner 1 Van To the TRC Only Upon 9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. No Charge Driver - 1 Owned Condos Request Source: Town of Vail Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter IV IV. FIVE-YEAR RIDERSHIP FORECASTS This section presents ridership projections for the 1993-1997 time period. The Vail Transportation Master Plan (TMP) previously mentioned presents long-range projections which are linked to expansion of the mountain. An 18 percent increase beyond the 1989-1990 ridership level was projected based on approved mountain capacity that had not yet taken place. For the short-range time frame being analyzed here, major mountain expansion and related development is not expected, although modest increases will occur. Therefore, five-year ridership projections, based on historical ' short-term growth patterns, are also expected to be relatively modest. Longer-term projections are also included in this TDP update report to better evaluate transit alternatives discussed in subsequent chapters. Historical ridership on Vail's bus system is illustrated graphically in Figure 6 for the past ] 0 years. Ridership for 1992 was estimated from four months of available data. Between 1982 and 1987, ridership increased at an annual average rate of 3 percent. Between 1987 and 1992 ridership has fluctuated, but has grown at an average rate of 2 percent per year. Much of the increase has come from the outlying routes which have increased annually at an average annual rate of 6 to 7 percent since 1987. The In-Town shuttle patronage has experienced very little growth on average increasing ' annually at an average rate of less than 1 percent since 1987. In estimating future demand, it is assumed that recent growth patterns will continue to occur; outlying ' route ridership will increase at a more rapid rate than that of the In-Town shuttle. Ridership is anticipated to level off some along the outlying routes but should continue to be greater than that of the In-Town shuttle. The following assumptions were used to estimate average growth in future transit demand: ' o Between 1992 and 1997, In-Town shuttle ridership will increase annually at a rate of 1 percent. ' o Between 1992 and 1997, outlying route ridership will increase annually at a rate of 4 percent. ' Using the assumptions stated above, annual future ridership projections were made and are illustrated in Table 5. Between the last full year of available data (1991) and 1997, the total ridership is estimated to increase about 5 percent to approximately 3.4 million riders. Approximately two-thirds are projected to ride the In-Town shuttle. ' Estimates of future paratransit use are shown in A Joint Paratransit Plan prepared by the Transit Expert, Inc. in June, 1992. The document referenced reports an estimated 13 ADA paratransit eligible ' people currently living in the Town of Vail. However, since paratransit service began, demand has been primarily made up of the visitor population and not year-round residents. As such, it has been estimated that 350 passenger-trips per year would be generated over the next 5-year time frame ' within the entire region (Vail Valley and Eagie Valley). ' Town of Vail Page 19 i? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.5 F E L S B U R G H 0 L T & ~ U L L E V I G I ~ 'tip ~ ~ ' . \ ` ; \ ' ~ . r y ~ X,; ~ ~ 0.5 .BRA < ; , < ' , r X 'l ~ C ~~Y. 0 1982 I 1984` I 1986 I 1988 I 1990 I 1992 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Est. Year In-Town Shuttle Outlying Routes Figure 6 V V Source: Town of Vail Town of Vail Annual Transit Ridership Town of Vail's TDP Update, 1988-1992. North Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter IV TABLE 5 ' PROJECTED ANNUAL TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 1993-1997 (IN 1,000's) Outlying. Year:: Irr-Town Shuttle Routes Total: 1993 2,135 1,000 3,135 ' 1994 2,160 1,040 3,200 1995 2,180 1,080 3,260 ' 1996 2,200 1,125 3,325 1997 2,225 1,170 3,395 Town of Vail Page 21 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter V V. EVALUATION OF EXISTING SERVICES The Town of Vail provides free transit service, 20 hours per day, 365 days per year to the general public that thoroughly covers the Vail Valley. Up to seven bus routes operate throughout the Town ' during ski season. Six of the seven routes serve outlying areas of Vail while one, the In-Town shuttle, serves the Vail Village and Lionshead Village areas. The In-Town shuttle provides service to a relatively small area, but yet it comprises about 70 percent of the ridership for the entire bus system. ' As such, its operating characteristics differ from the outlying routes. The following sections of the report address current operations of the outlying routes, the In-Town shuttle, paratransit service and system administrative operations. ' A. OUTLYING ROUTE SERVICE The six outlying bus routes provide thorough coverage to Vail including the East Vail area, golf course, Ford Park, West Vail north of I-70, West Vail south of I-70, and the Sandstone area as shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The winter schedule for each route is shown in the Appendix. The six routes originate at the Village Transportation Center (near Vail Village) which serves as a transfer point ' between Town routes as well as to Down Valley routes. The Vail bus system, as it currently exists, provides a high degree of mobility to the Town in both geographic coverage and service frequency. Recent improvements to the system have further ' improved the level of service provided to the outlying areas. These improvements include the following: ' o Routine service between the Transportation .Center and Ford Park is now provided. This service is provided in conjunction with service to the golf course and East Vail. ' o Peak periods of service have been extended for all routes in which bus headways are one-half those during non-peak periods. In 1991, the outlying routes carried nearly one million riders. Buses accumulated nearly 28,000 hours ' and 343,000 miles of travel along these routes costing about $722,000 (includes portion of administration costs). Table 6 shows some common performance measures for the outlying routes, the In-Town Shuttle (which is discussed in the following section) and state-wide averages for ski ' areas. As shown, passengers per vehicle-mile and passengers per vehicle-hour measures are comparable to state-wide averages. The per passenger cost of 73 cents is one-half the state average, but the vehicle-mile cost is higher than the state average. ' Town of Vail Page 22 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter V TABLE 6 1991 TOWN OF VAIL TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASURES butlying.RQUtes In-Town .Colorado Ski Area Measure Shuttle Average (1) Passengers per Vehicle-Mile 2.9 10.0 2.3 Passengers per Vehicle-Hour 35.9 70.4 37.9 Cost per Passenger (2) $0.73 $0.40 $1.47 Cost per Vehicle-Mile (2) $2.10 $4.01 $1.42 Cost per Vehicle-Hour (2) $26.05 $28.16 Not Available I (1) From Updating a Transportation Development Program for Rural and Smalt Urban Areas, Colorado Department of Transportation, January, 1990. ' (2) Includes administrative costs. The outlying bus routes have flexibility in terms of service frequency and specific routing of buses, and scheduling is often adjusted to accommodate fluctuating ridership demand relative to peak and non-peak hours, late night, and seasonal variations. The shortest headway interval between buses during peak periods is currently 15 minutes. The potential exists to increase the hourly capacity of each route by adding buses to shorten headways. Given that ridership is projected to increase by less than 20 percent between 1991 and 1997, running more buses along the critical routes during peak periods should be an adequate measure to accommodate the projected demand for the next five to six years. For example, if additional buses were added along a route resulting in a decrease of headways from 15 minutes to 10 minutes, transit capacity would be increased by 50 percent (6 buses an hour rather than 4); more than enough to accommodate projected demand. In addition, buses currently in the fleet will be modified to have a perimeter seating arrangement which will increase standing room and the overall capacity of a single coach. All replacement buses purchased by the Town will also have perimeter seating. This will also contribute to increasing capacity along the outlying routes. Besides increases in capacity, minor route modifications can also be made in the future, if warranted, with little effort. The outlying routes should continue to be monitored to determine what scheduling and coverage adjustments are needed, if any. Town of Vail Page 23 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter V 1 B. IN-TOWN SHUTTLE The In-Town shuttle operates year-round and carries over 2.2 million riders annually along a 1.75 mile route between Golden Peak and West Lionshead Circle. A portion of the route is restricted to ' pedestrians and bus traffic only. The route serves the high-density, commercial lodging and retail core of Vail. During peak winter periods up to 30,000 riders may use the In-Town shuttle on a single day. Visitors, mainly destination and day skiers, make up the bulk of the winter day ridership. Destination visitors also use the shuttle to travel between the slopes, lodging, dining, and shopping ' attractions within Vail and Lionshead villages. Day visitors, local residents and employees use the shuttle as an internal circulator after having parked in either the Vail or Lionshead parking structures. ' Performance measures of the In-Town Shuttle are presented in Table 6 along with outlying route and average state-wide statistics. As shown, the passenger per vehicle-mile and per vehicle-hour statistics are significantly higher than those for the outlying routes and state averages. The passenger cost is ' only 40 cents per rider, however, the per-vehicle-mile cost is over $4.00. This pattern (a higher vehicle-mile cost than passenger cost) is similar to that for the outlying routes, but is much more skewed due to the significant amount of ridership occurring along such a short route. ' The In-Town shuttle is the backbone of the Vail transportation system. Because of the rather unique linear nature of Vail's mountain-town-highway orientation, the shuttle performs singularly what is typically parceled out to separate transit services in most other North American resort communities. ' In the typical ski resort, the community bed base, skier-mountain, nightlife/retail, and day skier parking are separate and distinct, sometimes several miles apart; Snowmass Village, Steamboat Springs, Jackson Hole, Sun Valley, and Crested Butte are examples. In these cases, separate routes ' and services are provided for day-skier parking shuttles, destination visitor shuttles and in-village circulation. In Vail, the In-Town shuttle must perform all of these functions. Clearly, the quality of experience for Vail visitors is tied closely to the operation of the In-Town shuttle. ' The village shuttle operates 19-1/2 hours a day between the hours of 6:30 AM and 2:00 AM. Frequency of service is typically eight minutes or less with the most intense service provided during the 3:30 to 5:30 afternoon hours when skiers departing from the slopes create the greatest demand for ' transportation. Ten vehicles are regularly scheduled for shuttle service during the afternoon rush. Occasionally four additional vehicles are pressed into service to respond to heavy demand. With 14 vehicles in service on the shuttle route the frequency between vehicles is often less than the dwell time at the major boarding points. This results in "bunching", i.e. buses running in tandem rather ' than uniformly spaced along the route. Operation efficiency breaks down under these conditions as passenger loads on the lead bus are usually greater than the trailing bus (or buses), and system speed is governed by the slower vehicle. As system speed slows, more passengers accumulate at stops ' between bus arrivals, dwell time increases accordingly thereby further reducing system speed and ensuring that incrementally more passengers will be waiting upon arrival at the next stop. The usual daytime average system speed of an estimated 7 to 8 MPH degrades to 3 or 4 MPH, or even less, ' during peak season afternoon hours. At these speeds and crowding conditions, many prospective riders will opt to walk. ' Town of Vail Page 24 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter V Figure 7 graphically depicts the number of daily hoardings along the shuttle route during 1991. ' Clearly, December 31st was the peak day of the year with over 26,000 hoardings. Late April and early May are when the daily ridership is least; only 179 hoardings were recorded on April 25th. It is estimated from the daily boarding counts that the current shuttle system was seriously overloaded between 15 to 20 days during the winter seasons of 1991 or about one day out of eight during ski ' season. Figure 8 illustrates peak hour ridership demand in rank order along the In-Town shuttle. Peak hour demand was calculated on the basis that it represents 8 percent of the daily demand. What is important to note by the slope of the curve depicted in Figure 8 is that relatively small increases ' in ridership, spread out uniformly over the entire ski season, will trigger a fairly significant increase in the number of days the current system will be overloaded during afternoon peak hours. This means destination skiers in the future will experience more occasions of overcrowding on the current shuttle ' system. Whereas peak week of high season visitors probably anticipate and will tolerate some overcrowding throughout Vail or any other major destination resort, this condition will prevail more frequently on the shuttle system probably during weekends when higher day-skier volumes are added to moderate-occupancy destination visitor volumes. These destination visitors may be unpleasantly ' surprised to experience overcrowding on the shuttle system during the "non-peak" weeks. The In-Town shuttle ridership is not projected to increase significantly through the 1997 time frame. ' Beyond 1997 with ski expansion, ridership demand can be expected to grow moderately and with a increase of 10 to 15 percent over 1991 levels, the system would be overloaded 30 to 35 days out of the 145 day ski season as shown in Figure 8. ' C. PARATRANSIT SERVICE Vail's paratransit service has been in operation for over a year. During the first 12 months of ' operation, 131 passenger-trips were served. To date, there have been no instances in which trips could not be served as a result of capacity constraints. The single van used for this service has been more than adequate to accommodate demand. ' D. ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS ' As mentioned, the Town of Vail's bus system is a free service. Operations are funded entirely by the Town's General Fund through a local sales tax and is supported by the Town Council. The system is heavily used, particularly in the winter, and has the second highest ridership level in the state second only to the RTD system in the Denver metropolitan area. Vail's transit system carries more people annually than the Colorado Springs transit system which serves an urban area of nearly 400,000 residents. ' The Town operates the system as a public service under authority granted to municipalities by Section 30-15 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The Department of Public Works and Transportation is responsible for operations which include the management and supervision of services, scheduling of vehicles and drivers, maintenance and acquisition of vehicles and facilities, marketing, obtaining insurance, and monitoring of the operations. The purchasing of vehicles and equipment is financed by the Town of Vail along with some matching funds that have come from UMTA. The Department ' is audited once a year by a private CPA firm who audits all of Vail's municipal departments. ' Town of Vail Page 25 ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . r 28 F E L S 8 U R G HOLT & 26 U L L E V I G 24 22 20 18 ~ 16 rn c ~ v -c ~ ~ 14 o ~ m ~ t 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC Figure 7 V ~ Source: Town of Vail 1991 In-Town Shuttle Daily Boardings North ~ rir i ~ r 2 L 5~ G G G 2.4 a`j & ~~E~~ G, 2.2 2 1.a 5~. ses~ tP aid o .6 tin9 CaPac~tY (14 Bu use ost 1997 pem o a t ~ Ex~ s F'Gt ~ cs. r N '1 4 ~ . ~ - _ - _~,w. -o CL t 2 - ~ ~ - ~ , ~ c E t 199 ~ Demand - J p V L ~ _ ~ Y ~ a~ ° .6 a° o.~ 130 X10 ~4Q 0 2 12o F~9~re ~ 7° g° goo s5 50 a° a anC! ° 1p a~ 4° na is Mat or Exceeds !Peak NeV~ pem 2° ~ of Days Dame pire~tro~a ' !n-To+~~ shuttle 1 ' Vail Transit Develo ment Plan U date, 1993-1997 Cha ter V P P P Figure 9 shows the Department of Public Works and Transportation Organization. The Department ' is managed by the Public Works/Transportation Director who reports to the Town Manager. The Parking/Transit Superintendent, who reports to the Public Works/Transportation Director, oversees day-to-day operation including the tasks listed in the previous paragraph and has authority over the other transit personnel including the Fleet Manager, Bus Operations Coordinator, Bus Supervisors, ' mechanics and drivers. The number of drivers employed by the town varies by season ranging from a low of 12 to a high of 69 during the winter season. All drivers are required to complete an 80 hour training program before they are allowed to drive. Starting in November, 1992, drivers and all other transit personnel will be subject to drug testing. Coordination with other transit entities outside of Vail is limited to the Avon/Beaver Creek transit ' system which was discussed earlier in the report. The two entities have recently concluded a Joint Paratransit Plan prepared by The Transit Expert, Inc. which was conducted to determine how both bus services will comply with provisions set forth in Americans with Disabilities Act. ' The two entities have also coordinated in regard to the actual Paratransit service. For riders needing to go outside the Town of Vaii, service is coordinated with the Town of Avon which has the authority to operate on I-70 and Highway 6. Passengers are transferred to the Town of Avon's Paratransit ' vehicle at the Chamonix North Frontage bus shelter or the Vail Transportation Center. Because Paratransit demand is fairly low for both bus systems, the two entities have also agreed to make their Paratransit vehicle available to each other in the event of mechanical failure. ' In addition to coordination on Paratransit service, the Town of Vail contributes $120,000 annually towards the operation of the Avon/Beaver Creek bus system. 1 ' Town of Vail Page 28 ' F E L S B U R G H O L T 8 , U L L E V I G Town Manager ....::::...:::.:.;:.;:.::.:r>::;: ' Public Works Transportation Director Transportation / Parking Fleet Manager Manager :.;:w.;:.::.:~.::. Bus Operation Coordinator iL:.i: i:::%ti• . . .r :}}:.v. .:.~G.•:.,, w:. <....~.w:............~Q...... ' Bus Parking Coordinator Supervisors Mechanics / Hostess / Drivers Booth Attendants Maintenance :::n ~iiti?i:;{.iijiiiiiii}i:::::•,:;?}:•:: "'i::•iii'riiii: is iit w.~:;; v: ........vvn v: i::?{. . :.ter. br; is?; vvv+.. ...:rx...v...n :.~.v.yv.~.w.... x v. vxr• Pi};. xr}}}r~::: .{4. ' Fi r gu e 9 ' V~ Department of Public Works and Transportation Organization ' North Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Cha ter VI P VI. EVALUATION OF SERVICE ALTERNATIVES ' Current service to Vail's outlying areas is adequate to meet projected ridership demand levels. As mentioned, these routes are very flexible in terms of varying their degree of service. Bus schedules ' are varied throughout the day and throughout the year in response to changing demand. This type of "demand response" operation should be adequate for future demand. Continuing to monitor operations will be required to determine specific adjustments of schedules and bus routing to meet ' changes in demand. The In-Town shuttle currently experiences periodic overcrowding, and although additional buses are added to the route during peak periods, there becomes a point in which adding buses does not increase ' capacity. As such, several alternatives for achieving a higher line capacity along this route were considered when developing the Vail Transportation Master Plan. For ease of comparison these have been grouped as "fixed guideway" or "at-grade" alternatives. ' A. FIXED GUIDEWAY ALTERNATIVE -OPTIMAL MONORAIL ' In evaluating the fixed guideway alternatives, two options were considered: a 10-station full replacement system and a truncated 4-station system accompanied with a "background" bus system. From the Vail Transportation Plan, it was found that an automated 10-station monorail over the ' distance of the shuttle route would be inefficient since vehicles must follow a rigid standard of deceleration, docking, door opening and closure, and subsequent controlled rate of acceleration. Duplicating the existing bus service with a 10-station system does not take full advantage of a grade separated operation due to the excessive time required for each stop. Therefore, only the higher- capacity 4-station system was retained for further evaluation. This truncated route would connect the Covered Bridge area of Vaii Village with the Gondola area ' of Lionshead Village via an elevated people mover. The loop would be 2.2 miles and cover 63% of the existing bus route, but would encompass about 78% of the existing hoardings. Presumably a "background" bus route would continue to operate between Golden Peak on the east and Marriott ' Mark (or even Cascade Village) on the west to maintain central shuttle service to these areas beyond the Village Core. Within the "pinched-loop" route, there would be a maximum of four stations. Each station would have a center as well as side platform to permit separate boarding and deboarding operations. Vehicle interiors would be adapted to facilitate carrying and stowing skis on board. This concept has ' been used successfully on a 4-station, 0.8 mile (each way) underground people mover system in the resort community of Serfaus, Austria. The net effect of station consolidation, dual-platform stations, and on-board skis will increase line ' capacity from the current estimate of 1,245 passengers per hour per direction (pphpd) to a total of 1,950 as shown in Figure 10. With a shortened route and a higher average speed, this line capacity can be achieved with fewer vehicles. Ten, or possibly 8, 2-car trains would be needed for this ' "optimal" people mover configuration. ' Town of Vail Page 30 2.6 Line Capacity of System Options F E L S B U R G N O L T & 2 4 10 4 Dual Station People Movers (8-10 Vehicles) U L L E U I G 1 O2 Special Shuttle Coach (14 Vehicles) 2.2 Q3 Existing Shuttle Bus (14 Vehicles) 2 O 1 1 O c'v 1.8 ~1 o~ Q. ~ ti v L 1.6 4 ~ 1. r ~ ` _ ~ 1 4 Future (Post 1997) Demand ~ ~ 0 ~~co 1.2 _ ~ _ ~ _ - / O ~ - 1 ~ O ~ _ ~ ~ - . ~ ` 0 8 -~1 a p 1991 Demand 1 ~ \ 0.6 _ :.ti 0.2 0 i~ 4 10 I 30 35 I 50 I 70 I 90 I 1 10 I 130 I 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 # of Days Demand is Met or Exceeded Figure 10 V~ In-Town Shuttle Alternatives Analysis North ~ ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VI The line capacity of the optimal monorail of 1,950 pphpd would be approximately 55 percent higher than the current system and about 13 percent higher than the high-capacity, at-grade shuttle bus system discussed in the following section. As shown in Table 7 the cost to develop the 2.2 mile "optimal" monorail system would about $24 million. ' TABLE 7 COMPARISON OF IN-TOWN SHUT iLE ALTERNATIVES I Special: Ete~ated ~pera>ion Parameters: Low=Floor Bus People: Mover 1. Route Length (miles) 3.5 2.2 2. Service Area Mariott Mark to Lionshead to Cov- ' Golden Peak ered Bridge 3. Ski Placement On Board On Board ' 4. Average System Speed (MPH) 7.5 ] 0.7 5. Line Capacity (Passengers per Hour per 1,720 1,950 (1) Direction) ' 6. Maximum Number Vehicles in Service 14 8 @ Peak ' 7. Vehicle Unit 40' Bus 32' 2-Car Train 8. Estimated Development Cost @ 16 = @ 10 = Vehicles $4,000,000 $ 3,550,000 ' Other $3.450.000 (2) $20.450.000 (3) Total $7,450,000 $24,000,000 ' Source: TDA using Lea Elliot reports for Town of Vail dated 2/ 16/87 and 3/22/90. Detailed calculations are presented in the Technical Appendix Report of the Vail Transportation Master Plan. ' (1) Optimal capacity, assumes 4-station, dual platform system. (Stations would be established based upon a more detailed operations and feasibility study.) ' (2) Includes an allowance for expanded maintenance facilities for special buses, minor roadway improvements, enhanced bus loading facilities as outlined in the Streetscape Plan, engineering, and contingencies. ' (3) Includes fixed facilities, engineering and contingencies. ' Town of Vail Page 32 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VI B. AT-GRADE HIGH CAPACITY BUS SYSTEM ' As an alternative to a capital intensive replacement for the existing shuttle service, the use of special high-capacity buses designed specifically for short-haul shuttle service of this type was investigated. Designed with low floors, multiple wide doors and high interior compartments for standee comfort, these vehicle types have been used for a number of years in Europe as airport apron service, shuttling passengers between airplanes and terminals. The vehicles used in Denver for shuttle service along the 1.1 mile long 16th Street Mall are an adaption of these buses. The special shuttle bus has a limited number of perimeter seats, thus catering more to standees. A newer generation of low-floor shuttle bus has wheel base dimensions similar to the Town's existing buses and thereby should be able to operate over the same route with minimal adjustment needed. ' The main attributes of the special low-floor, high-ceiling bus are reduced dwell time at stops and ability to accommodate more passengers on board than either the conventional 35-seat bus or the 2- car generic monorail. Dwell time is minimized by the multiple doors, one-step entry/exit and ability to carry skis on board. The net effect of these features is an estimated 25% improvement in system speed as compared to the existing bus operation and about a 35% increase in line capacity of a comparable size transit bus fleet (14 vehicles) due to the combination of higher average system speed ' and more passenger capacity per vehicle. The cost of adding a new fleet of 16 special low-floor buses (2 spares) including vehicle design development costs, maintenance facility modifications, and allowance for bus stop, streetscape and utility improvements along the existing route is about $7.5 million (1990 As Figure 10 shows the line capacity achieved by using these special shuttle buses would reduce the number of days currently experiencing overloads from 17 to 1. With increases in demand beyond the 1997 time frame the ' special bus fleet would be overloaded only 4 days per year. C. IN-TOWN SHUTTLE RECOMMENDATIONS/PRIORITIES A reliable, convenient, and safe in-town shuttle is essential for mobility in Vail Village. Transit coach delivery of this service has sufficed, for the most part, for the past decade. However, as increases in visitation continue, overcrowding and dissatisfaction with the current system capabilities will occur more frequently during afternoon peak travel times for destination and day skiers. Two avenues have been explored in this study for expanding the capacity of the In-Town shuttle system ' to match growing demand. As previously analyzed, the monorail system, when adapted to its most effective application, could achieve faster, quieter and more reliable service than the existing bus system. The Lionshead to Covered Bridge monorail as described would offer about 55% more capacity than is possible with the existing service, however, fewer stops would be provided under this option. This would allow the shuttle system to operate without overloads on all but about one day per year beyond the 1997 ' horizon. Not withstanding the visual, environmental, and pedestrian impacts of introducing the elevated monorail system, the development costs would be substantial; about $24 million. Town of Vail Page 33 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VI ' Alt hough not as dramatic in capacity improvement and still subject to at-grade interference, the high-capacity fleet alternative does achieve a substantial, 38%, increase in capacity at a considerably lower, $7.5 million, development cost than the monorail (see Table 7). Part of this cost is new vehicle acquisition; a cost which will be experienced to some degree in a few years to replace existing vehicles, regardless of what shuttle system decision is reached. i It is recommended that the high-capacity bus alternative is the appropriate shuttle system solution for the 1993-1997 service period and beyond. The vehicles needed for the shuttle fleet can be acquired over atwo-season period as replacements for vehicles scheduled for retirement. In the interim period, a technical committee should deveiop the performance specifications for these special use vehicles and a solicitation of interest should be sent to all potential bus manufacturing bidders. ' Town of Vail Page 34 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VII VII. OPERATIONS PLAN This chapter of the report details the operations plan for Vail's transit system. The chapter is subdivided into 3 sections each dealing with a specific element of the system. The sections include: ' Service Operations, Capital Acquisition/Replacement and the Financial Plan. A. SERVICE OPERATIONS ' It is recommended that Vail's transit service area remain similar to that which is currently being served (Figure 2, 3, and 4 in Section III). The system should continue to be monitored, as has been historically occurring, by recording bus hoardings and holding monthly meetings in different areas of Town to solicit public input. Route modifications should be considered when warranted pending results of the monitoring effort, particularly for the outlying routes. Operations should continue to function under the current positional hierarchy with duties and procedures to continue as present. One additional procedure to implement is the drug testing of transit personnel, particularly bus drivers and operators of heavy equipment. Drug testing is scheduled to begin in November, 1992. In order to meet the requirements specified by the Americans with Disabilities Act, all new transit coaches to be purchased should be equipped with a wheelchair lift for operation along the fixed ' routes. Paratransit service should continue to be provided to all areas within the Vail town limits. Coordination with the Avon/Beaver Creek bus system concerning paratransit service should continue in terms of providing "back-up" vehicles and the transfer of paratransit riders between the two bus systems. With each bus system owning their own paratransit vehicle and with coordination between the two systems regarding this service, paratransit demand through the 1997 time frame should be adequately served under the current operations. 1 Also as part of on-going operation, all bus stops and bus shelters will be maintained and replaced as needed. B. CAPITAL ACQUISITION/REPLACEMENT The bus replacement/addition schedule through the 1997 time frame is shown in Table 8. All new conventional buses should have a perimeter seating arrangement allowing more room for standees and increasing the overall capacity of each bus. Buses currently in the fleet not scheduled for retirement will be modified to include perimeter seating. The low floor special coaches should be used on the ' In-Town Shuttle route only. Table 9 shows that the fleet will consist of 50 vehicles by the end of 1997 of which 35 will be ADA accessible and l2 of these will be limited to In-Town Shuttle use only. Currently there are federal standards being developed which would require buses to meet certain emission criteria. Pending the specifics of these standards, the potential exists to operate buses using alternative fuel sources. Research and testing may be required as part of this plan to determine whether switching to an alternate source is required and feasible. The Town also intends to initiate a maintenance program in which the Town Shop and Bus Barn will be improved and expanded. Town of Vail Page 35 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VII TABLE 8 BUS REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE ;Year ; , Retired Buses: Nevr Bus Type 1993 None 1 Low-Floor Special Coach (Orion VI) ' 1 Conventional Bus w/Perimeter Seating 1994 #151-155 (5 Total) 5 Conventional Buses w/Perimeter Seating ' 1995 #156-160, 181 (6 Total) 7 Conventional Buses w/Perimeter Seating 6 Low-Floor Special Coaches (Orion VI) 1996 #161-165 (5 Total) 5 Conventional Bus w/Perimeter Seating 5 Low-Floor Special Coaches (Orion VI) 1997 None 1 Conventional Bus w/Perimeter Seating Source: Town of Vail TABLE 9 TOWN OF VAIL BUS FLEET AT END OF 1997 Vehicle Vehicle: Number of Wheelchair Make/Type ( Quantity Seats: .Model-Year(s) Lift? I GMC 1 21 1981 No Chevy Van 1 (1) 12 1990 Yes Orion 1 35 1982 No Orion 13 39 1989-1991 No ' Orion I 22 (2) 36 1992-1997 Yes Orion VI 12 (3) 30 1993, 1995, 1996 Yes TOTAL I 50 I I I (1) Paratransit vehicle. (2) ADA accessible. (3) Special low-floor coach for In-Town shuttle; ADA accessible. Can hold up to 65 standees. „ , ' Town of Vail Page 36 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Chapter VII C. FINANCIAL PLAN ' The Financing Plan for Vail's transit system through 1997 is shown in Table 10. The plan includes the servicing of bus shelters, maintenance of the Town shop and bus barn, acquisition of new vehicles, and system operations including administrative costs. As shown, routine service operations will cost approximately $2 million a year. Capital acquisition costs are expected to range from approximately $500,000 to $3.5 million plus potential costs for developing alternative fuel sources pending Federal regulations currently being developed. The last section of Table 10 shows sources of funding. Vail qualifies for Section 18 funding (general transit assistance to rural and small urban areas) in which monies are available to cover 80 percent of ' the operating and capital costs. Funding for the development of alternate fuel sources may be available per the Surface Transporta- tion Program which specifies that highway and transit research programs are eligible for assistance. Funding may also be available for other transit research projects to test new concepts not currently foreseeable. 1 ' Town of Vail Page 37 ' Vail Transft Development Plan U date, 1993-1997 Cha ter VII P P TABLE 10 ' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND OPERATIONS FINANCING PLAN ($1,000'S) :Prefect I' 1993 1994 I ]995 1996 1997 1 Expenditures ' Service Operations In-Town Shuttle 81 I 831 852 873 895 Outlying Routes 842 863 885 907 930 ' Paratransit Service 10 1 I 11 11 11 Host Service 6 6 6 6 6 Administration 251 257 264 270 277 Bus Shelter Maintenance 42 44 46 48 51 Sub-Total 1,962 2,012 2,064 2,115 2,170 Capital Acquisition/Replacement ' Street Improvement/Separation of 250 650 600 600 600 Buses and Pedestrians Replacement Buses - I ,125 1,416 1,240 - Additional Buses 225 - 236 255 Replacement Shelter 40 40 40 40 40 Additional Cost for Low-Floor Buses 0 1,125 1,416 1,240 Town Shop/Bus Barn Renovation 370 563 375 600 0 ' Required for Low-Floor Buses - - Conversion to Perimeter Seating l 3 ] 5 18 Development of Alternate Fuels ' Electronic Devices 94 100 100 95 - Bus Stop Street Lights 30 30 30 30 30 Sub-Total 1,022 3,648 4,231 3,845 925 ' I TOTAL EXPENDITURES I 2,984 I 5,660 I 6,295 I 5,960 I 3,095 Fundine ' Section 18 (1) TOV 1,110 1,658 1,799 1,746 1,187 Federal 1,874 4,002 4,496 4,214 1,908 * Costs dependent upon Federal bus emission standards currently under development. (1) Funding allocation based on 80% Federal match for capital and administration expenditures and 50% match on remaining operations deficit. Town of Vail Page 38 ' Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Cha ter VII P Street Improvements Necessary to Improve In Town Shuttle Improvements Street Name Total Cost East Lionshead Circle $ 650,000.00 ' East Meadow Drive $ 650,000.00 West Meadow Drive $1,200,000.00 Slifer Plaza $1,000,000.00 ' Vail Valley Drive ~ 1.200.000.00 Total $4,700,000.00 ' 5096 of Cost Necessary for Improved Efficiency ' Town of Vail Page 39 Vail Transit Development Plan Update, 1993-1997 Appendix APPENDIX TOWN OF VAIL BUS ROUTE SCHEDULE 1 1 1 Town of Vail w w w ~w w ¦w w~ w w s w wl w ww w~ w ww WINTER BUS SCHEDULE SUMMER BUS SCHEDULE AVON/BEAVER CREEK TRANSIT East Vuil Express _ _ West Vail South EAST VAIL EXPRESS pEAK HO14URS EVE..N~ING HOURS WEST VAIL SR NO 7a, [K IV UV9a BL U E In , , vA, ,K A . GREEN RUN PEAK FRB « 9r,pT.I.m.mr.. ,n. A . . «9,.N7.m7 5:45A-2:0I/A asA a4aP .00-200A 200 0oA 471ar °"CfiL"li1c (SOUTH) 4,1A-,9.9A .>o.,D,.P,•1•. T. u,,ael Nr Cb (Ilo f- - .S Iq 15 ]0 W 30 - 1~011i~a~1' :..;:'A 3.' isoA .,oA A.f..~i.« so w 2a .]5os 35 6:OOA--2:10A xwP-•1bP _ Ror.Ih FMI• 51 00 21 N 00 36 Tr.n• Mbr1 CV 00 :to W :W 30 :10 -50 20 :10 50 c F. ••I V•i1 53 W 2] M 10 ]e ? Court HMI PI•a. :W :13 23 :03 eJ :33 :13 63 :le ae :50 :30 :le :ee :3e :1e :ee Pu Cr«I I w ss :10 as 40 _ 10 .o j c..~e. C-1 04 =O lp..Hyr R d _ se ze_ .1 n_ 41 _ C_u VIII.p. 08 :18 Oe 50 ]e 16 :5e :30 :10 :Be 0] C I • &1Lr 1157 12 27 42 12 42 Ml01NINpn 00 :21 :41 01 Al 21 01 :41 :21 01 blr:•m• a Cncb ___58 U_ _5__ i3 - -17 43 5 Pulm .n 11 o za :43 w u :23 m :u za w - O Trmlwr F•Ib_ _ _ _ 00 15 :70 _013 _ _14 M UnOr • :13 28 :46 :08 :46 :26 00 :40 :28 06-- 7 R_•cgrnl Cwb Muu„I._M•.aow• 02 1-__..2 :7 _15_-'.5 _ In.rmwm.in :16 :29 :40 :00 'A0 :29 A9 :W :20 :00 0,9-n P.,k _ 03 18 :37 .._:40 10 '.46 O M..Aw :16 :31 :51 :11 51 31 :11 :61 :1 :11_ Edo. E.n. E- 04 .19 .34 49 17 47 2 Udr :A :33 :03 :13 :93 :33 :13 :03 :33 :q Transportation from Vail to Beaver M.dow L4n.7A.In Ga_ - 04 19 24 .w :O 47 O, C code VIII• :21 :37 :07 :17 !7 :37 :17 A7 47 97 M•In Goo/Juni 'I- - 00 -'.21 36 51 - 19 :49 00 C-L HMI PI.. :24 :40 W :20 :00 :40 20 m 40 10 Creek®Resart, Avon, Edwards, Mein Gor•IRrpnom Rod Oe '.23 38 '.53 21 51 = Tm•ponrbn LV :27 :N M 21 W :M 21 :01 :N 24 I I ' l' T~ k" --°-I'S- 5 22 2 - - - R EagleVail7 leadville and back is ',or Slreo d• Erl - 11 211 41 :50 23 35 c, Cd„mEh,HRr9nom --12.. 27 -42 57 24_ 5 West Vail North p we Eul Como. 13 10_43 158 - 25 55 provided by Avon/Beaver Creek m P-C-1,Pa3 i~- 29 44 _S9 26 56 WEST VAIL F...1 v.n , :7_- 7__ RED PEAK HOURS Transit. , ur B«nIF.n• .e 03 29 :58 .9., • mr•Nw• MON•P[AK [V ENINO 19 HOURS HOURS R.ID A4mm..n 19 U 49 04 30 00 (NORTH) •oO AANO ».°N°'•r,v...,. »1,,vn m7.N,r.,. Tun. un.mn isnlxi IRC 25 40 55 10 76 00 xI4P-u•v :,•A-c4eP .:,.P_x:,.A Pease cal 949-6121 or scheduling 6:00 A-2:15A 1 C1 Tr4a,• n•,ron CV. C '.00 15 :]0 .45 '.15 .015 15 45 Golf Course-Ford Park = Sud•IaneSC 02 :17 :32 :47 :17 :47 :17 47 Information. 71-FW •V1e. • 05 20 35 50 :20 :50 20 :50 GOI FF COURSE FOHDPARK ~ POSTOFFICE 07 22 :31_52 :22 :52 22 :52 YELLOW / ORANGE W.•1 VW Mail :oo :24 39 :s. '.24 54 '.24 :54 GKYIIMIN IN. From• • :12 :27 :13 .07 27 :07 :27 :07 MORNING INBOUND AFTERNOON OUTBOUND -av, Inn .15 30 :U 0100 :w :00 :3000 _ 3p MrnUIE iNTERVAIS 39 MINUTE INTEHVµs Z V.4 Ou Scnonl 10 :31 46 01 :31 01 31,_01 elua .o ~oA ,I OOA •ooP J S~'G••N 17 22 47 02 32 '02- -22 02 O Tim- RW9WNb • '.21 :JO 'S1 06 >e Oe :30 :Oe _ a (Intl t Ju 1. •r •1..,.u.,n nr jlR, 00 Jo = S...'_Sc`-I 23 36 53 08 28 :08 28 '08 I rAA+. 05 35 G.11- P_k 05 '.35 - - Trwponnbn CU (TRCL_ :58 :11 : 0111 :11 1610 SunGr •I Q v. De :74 S- F11J0 :Oe 3i__ 28 41 11 I1 !148 VW V•u.y air._.. 07 37 Pl.rmi9.n W.n .07 77 - - - PI rmi~n E .I 08 >e Hvmip.n Eul Oe 38 M•rmr2.nG 00 30 _ 10110 SmWIII -ml qlv. _ _ :10 40 s«r-. F.aa -lo a ielo s,.,o...l oln. i1 i1 -PPe1,MN,.nor AT '116105-b - :12 942 .n. ~ cd Rc to 4s te19 unbv.I Dn.. :13 :a v SUMMER BUS SCHEDULE The Town of Vail operates a wheelchair FnrG Pne '70 'S0 Tr- eon Clr. RC 18 46 Tr:n•ponsean CV-(<FCl ---25 _~''35 Fm. P.rk 29 59 lift-equipped para-transit van service for NIGHT OUTBOUND Trw eon ar :25 :55 EAST VAIL SUMMER 30 MINUTE INTERVALS EAST VAIL EXPRESS GOLF COURSE/FORD PARK those who are unable to use the fixed Vm94UVrn 440P-24bA 6Ui•m-Il tpOm l]OOVm 900pm •40•m up BUS Slops ~..•,.-~!1WP---- em___ w._..._r.I4opm .e:.op_. route buses. (naCl 0 40 ONLY AT 11c _ _w 1~ _ N1- . 05 cal.n P«.. 4] 13 - S F«d 14 .4 DESIGNATED _ N So c. FMC, _ u N.- en Wu•~ 15 s BUS STOPS[ -----u05-9 E. - s ? Rides can be requested on a --G BIIUn RvaO 10 1440WV: Pl.rmr EuI te .018 Pna y -day basis with 24-hour 5urd.r w next 1448 V'1 Van D- 10 4e _ PI0115U US13 Sve4mV0e fr.nG. C•lcM vnrlw. 1 12 1 16~9 51 1610 al-V D,". 19 49 d41bN _ Clunnouu 2t - 51 - "blop roquest" T•roer FMK '1] 16105 . 52_ advance reservations. 1610 S-m --i nrrv, 22 52 on,nnlying Lkw' IC_ - _is_ Faawn U 6 TRC Reservation can be made up to Fom P•iN M 51 two weeks in advance. L•n> un CV InC ' i7 Man (fie-JUG __.1e . Rac~CND 1wNn _ A Co>Nro.r. B.IMnRo•a z1 Sandsione L ? The service is operated within f ally M Val 25 SANDSTONE the limits of the Town of Vail. PURPLE 20 MINUTE INTERVALS 610A--2.10A 00110. }.10A i~s,»,b,LI,Pr~cNLrR1_____ --__10____.30 5o WEST VAIL SUMMER For more information or to make R. 15_•no-! School :13 X33 53 WESI VAIL-REDMORTH WEST VA0.-I7REEN/SOUTH reservations, call 479-2174. R.e§*n Ion* Rood :15 .35 :55 61S•m 1213 D.m I]ISV m. 9150. 0.45.m-124•Dm1315pm 9450. V.rl V-111R S.M•lon• IT .37 .57 FI. ..4,rac. 115 Pm N215pm rv. IY .~Ic•IISOm •M}'45pm n.• SMa•IDn• Cr•le Club 19 39 :59 1 Simb.R••on :20 :40 00 5"fib•s`^-° _ _ 17o e.0w-A'O11 N R_Lar"PO•N crr vMl Run 21 AT 01 v4 vr..m.e 5•r,K1lu. tba a C4NN.m,..•w 50 R•. S.no•IOn. Scnoal :23 :43 :03 54..9nr G4•. fie 21 2 141lMIen Tnn eon CV (TRC) 27 :47 :07 SmD•M a HF.N¢1 67 •+.rew..r 01..01 ime: wa. as a 4o•.11s m In-Torun Shuttle (Villa a/Lionshead VIU E/UONSHEAD w a wHM• o 6.15 A - 2.15 A 7 TO 10 MINUTE INTERVALS nano. a u 0e~crr >A Rn on 7 1010 minull rn1•n.14 .1815 • m. Run. Mrou9b 2:15. m Rao. 37 MEMORANDUM TO: Town Council FROM: Mike Mollica, Assistant Director of Planning DATE: March 2, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for a Conditional Use permit for an addition to the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department, located at 75 South Frontage Road West. Ylv:::::.~.:;.;.;.}•ni:v:{:.:-~:x:xi:~:~.'.'.......:..tvi..•:~:':::::.'i:•.•?{;i~~::%°J:~Y:i:.......v{.;_::.....~.......~v:.•.......F.;::::.i3:%i: .::..{.:::i}i:4ii:4:-iii: iv......•.v~"~i.`•i}?:v 'i........ }vy:? i;yyy,.}vx"b}y. bi:•y;::ti:::~i:`~;+':•i ::::.::::::::::Ab:::i:.::::::i•:ii'•iti~:~'.:ii•:'::iiiij::.ii:': ii v~ii:~''::~'•::{{: _ v.. n. .n..~. .:L~} z.. r....rx n ...t ..r r r n: vi'C;+.{nw::,x„ . _x. r .v............v........... .•xv~:.•: w:::::: rrn:: xF:: ,::y ~:::::•::+'.i>i •ii;..i i':: n$:C:.::.v,.,.;{. Y........ }.x i T,...v }.n........ .r v... v ..:v:;w...nw:::::::n~..+•..;; r.....::. n......; <; ..:•xv;::;; r.:~.tir ...v .v... r...... v: r:::n 4::•{.},vn: iii:^:J:.i::::;iii}:v, ii:~ ::..i 4:i{yy.}-::n -~::..•:.4 ..v. nr. r. ..s. v...., .::v•viw:•+..vv. n,.. r:w::: t:: v....,...n.... n .n.,.} :::v :!v w;: v .............nw::::..:.......... r..:.v:..:.:::.... .v.....:.L-:: i.i iiiri:: iYv <vv..,..:,r,.._ r.}. ...nx.v::::':`.•: n..n.....n....,,, v:..:..r viii.::..., v.....-. $?;.':a+;ciro-Si:L::....:............. .•-:yviviiuct:~.:;::i::%+:i`-.v...~nvvv..., n.... a......... .~%!$i[%i!.wsw::::;iiNM.. x, .:4:d:':i xr+w..vu.a....~..........n~n•.{v: On February 22, 1993 the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a Conditional Use permit request for the Police addition. The motion for approval of the permit was carried by a vote of 4-3, and included the following ten conditions: i) That a Colorado Department of Transportation access permit be secured prior to the Town's issuance of any building or grading permits for the project. 2) That the proposed architectural modifications to the existina Municipal Building, as depicted on the north, south and west elevation drawings, be a part of the Police addition. 3) That a parking analysis for the entire Municipal Complex be performed upon completion and occupancy of the Police addition. The intent of this parking analysis would be to determine the types of users and occupancy percentage of all the Municipal parking spaces. This analysis would allow the Town staff to better understand the parking situation at the Municipal Complex and would provide the staff with the necessary information to fully utilize all the available parking spaces. The staff would insure that the PEC be updated on the results of this analysis. 4) That the project be reviewed to insure compliance with the adopted Building and Fire Codes of the Town of Vail. Preliminary code reviews have indicated that it may be necessary to sprinkle the existing Municipal Building as a part of the new construction for the Police addition. 5) That the following items be included as a part of the Police addition: • Two new crosswalks on the South Frontage Road. • A sidewalk on the south side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, east to Vail Road (curb & gutter will also be necessary). • A sidewalk on the north side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, west to the western crosswalk (curb & gutter will be necessary and possibly a storm sewer to carry drainage). 1 6) That additional landscaping be installed as a part of the Police addition. This additional landscaping would be located between the Municipal Complex and the CDOT right-of-way to the north. The landscaping would extend the length of the northern property line of the Municipal Complex, while still allowing for snow storage and helicopter access. 7) That a signage plan for the entire Municipal Complex be submitted and approved by the Design Review Board. The plan should specifically direct the public to the proper parking lot and to the primary entrance into the Municipal Building. 8) That the thirteen surface parking spaces, located to the west of the Municipal Annex, be available for use prior to the Town's issuance of a building permit for a Police addition. The grassed area around the heliport should be thoroughly raked and the parking lot should be swept to ensure that rocks and debris do not damage parked vehicles during use of the heliport. 9) That the Town of Vail initiate a study to reduce the number of vehicular trips made by full-time employees of the Town. Town employees should be encouraged to carpool and to use the Town and valley-wide bus systems. 10) That the eastern-most surface parking lot (thirteen parking spaces} be available for use by Municipal employees (non-Police) until such time as the Police Department can document, through a parking study, that the spaces are needed for the Police Department. 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: February 22, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for a Conditional Use permit for an addition to the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department, located at 75 South Frontage Road West (at the east end of the existing Municipal Building), and as legally described below: A part of the Southeast i/4 of Section 6, Township 5 South, Range 80 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, more particularly described as fo?lows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 6, thence North 00 degrees 28 minutes 16 seoonds West and along the East line of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 72.75 the East line of said Southeast 1/4 of said Section 6 72.75 feet to a point, said point being 110.00 feet northeasterly from the southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 6 as measured at right angles thereto; thence North 79 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds West and along a line parallel to said southerly right-of-way line 145.50 feet to The True Point of Beginning; thence North 16 degrees OS minutes 47 secends East 78.00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds West 428.70 feet; thence North 66 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West 152.57 feet; thence South 27 degrees 42 minutes 40 seconds West 192.66 feet; Lhence South 52 degrees 48 minutes 50 seconds East 36.32 feet to a point, said point being 110.00 teet northeast from said South right-of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 6 as measured at right angles thereto; thence South 79 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds East and along a line parallel to said South right of way line 585.56 feet to The True Point of Beginning. Except that portion conveyed to the Board of County Commissioners of Eagle County, and the Department of Highways, State of Colorado by rule and order recorded January 5, 1971 in Book 219 at Page 441. Applicant: Town of Vail Planner: Mike Mollica ~y,: ir : ..:.:......................•,..........u•::::x.:t•>::>a•r:t::.:::y:•::v:•:•~•-.:T:>:•Y:>::.:a:':.ti~^:::aia:>::: ii ..u:::: iY.'•ln....... :.vx?w: f~!..' ................t..:........i:•:i...........:: i=:=ii vv::. w:.: •.~.}::•i•Av.::::.v;.•••......... n~:..`.~i~ •.'..:~:.~>i. ~'x::: rv.f.jYi':::::.~n }Y.v'n:^.:v?i~:•f. .t. :tt . . v.s ............:.........:iini isii:{•ii:~:?~iiiix;.;:•:::.:;:.~::::::::._::._::::::::::::,::::::::::v:a:::::~::?::::::::::::.:~::.:::.~:.~::::.iiiii:~..........:......::::. ................::::::..:::.v::::+•};:::.i f4:{:. :vx:: i::.~:. r:::::::::.i ;:::.i'.~::.. ............................:vii:~:i!!v::biiiiJi::•:: n4i 4ii:i•. :vYi L}:i;?i~Y.i~•~ii:ii C ii::iii'r:i'r:C?y::±~iiiiiiiiii::'r'~iiiii~:~iiiiiTi::<vi•ii::iii:iv: Fiii.'li~iii ~:4i ~~iiii:-i: r:~~}: ~ ii:~iii::i:~i}i:::i%ii:J:vii:i~ i:4:•:iii}: iii..:.~n:v:{:!;:<i'rf~ii~ ~i:i~iii::::::•'.:::i::~ i:>i iiiiii:::~i::})i::~iiiji.'•iii::i'v~'l r J w1•. -4r.•n•.vr.•ht4,41•:•i:Vr.... w. ::n rC.:d... 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST The Town of Vail is requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow for the expansion of the Vail Police Department, located at 75 South Frontage Road. The property on which the Municipal Building is located, (which includes the existing Vail Police Department) is zoned Public Use District. Public buildings and public service facilities are considered Conditional Uses within the District, pursuant to Chapter 18.36.030 of the Town's Municipal Code. Because the proposed expansion to the Vail Police Department is a modification to an existing use, a Conditional Use permit is required. 1 The Public Use District is fairly unique in that the development standards for the district are specifically prescribed by the Planning Commission during the review of a development proposal. This review is not unlike the Special Development District process whereby setbacks, building height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and the general site development are specifically tied to a development plan. The off- street parking requirements are also established by the Planing and Environmental Commission. II. ZONING ANALYSIS The proposed expansion to the Vail Police Department would be located immediately to the east of the existing Police facility. The existing floor area (approximately 5,944 square feet) of the Police Department would continue to be utilized by the Police and would be reconfigured and remodeled as a part of the project. Anew two-story building of approximately 15,505 square feet of office space, and 34 structured parking spaces, would be constructed. No underground parking is included in the proposal. Architecturally, the proposed addition has been both internally, and externally, redesigned to facilitate the use of the existing Police area. The overall layout (site planning) of the addition steps back from the South Frontage Road, as viewed from west to east. This design solution, as recommended by the PEC and the Design Review Board at previous work sessions, is intended to break up both the overall mass and bulk of the structure, as well as the linear form of the building. Please see the attached elevation drawings for further details on the design. The gross area of the structured parking would consist of approximately 10,530 square feet. This includes areas dedicated to the sallyport, the vehicle impound and all vehicular circulation corridors. The common areas of the building, which include stair - corridors, a pedestrian ramp and the elevator core (ADA requirements), storage rooms and mechanical areas, total approximately 3,619 square feet. The gross area of the entire project (office space, common areas and structured parking) would be 31,979 square feet. Please see the attached site plan and floor plan's for more T specific information regarding the layout of the proposal. a. Site Area: The Municipal site consists of 89,132 square feet, on two parcels. The Municipal Annex is on a separate parcel from the main Municipal Building, however for zoning purposes, and per the PEC's suggestion, the entire site has been analyzed as a whole. b.~ Site Coveraae: The existing site coverage for the Municipal Complex is approximately 16,265 square feet, or 18.2%. 2 The proposed site coverage of the Municipal Complex, with the new Police addition, is approximately 30,262 square feet, or 33.9%. c. Buildina Heiaht: The maximum height of the existing Municipal Building is approximately 34 feet. The maximum height of the proposed addition to the Police Building has been designed so that it would not exceed the highest ridge of the existing Municipal Building. In general, the main roof ridges of the proposed Police addition range in height from 30 to 34 feet, d. Parking Analysis The existing parking for the Municipal site is as follows: 47 spaces -east of Municipal Building 49 spaces -between the Municipal Bldg. and the Municipal Annex (central lot) i3 spaces -west of the Municir~al Annex 109 spaces -TOTAL The existing surface parking which is located between the Municipal Building and the Municipal Annex (49 spaces), and the parking spaces west of the Municipal Annex (13 spaces) will be retained with the Police expansion. If the We Recycle facility moves to another location (off-site), then an additional 10-11 parking spaces would become available for municipal use. The proposed parking garage for the Police addition is designed to accommodate 34 vehicles, (this includes one parking space in the vehicle impound area, but does not include the two spaces in the sally port). In addition, it is proposed that there be 13 exterior parking spaces. All of the exterior spaces would be located immediately to the east of the new parking garage. The surface parking spaces would be screened by the use of berming and landscaping. The proposed structured parking (34 spaces), the proposed new surface parking (13 spaces), and the existing surtace parking in the central and west lots which will be retained after the Police addition is constructed (62 spaces), totals 109 spaces. As presented, the new parking garage would be used exclusively as secured Police parking. The general public, and. all the other Municipal employees who work in the Municipal Complex, will be directed to the 49 surface parking spaces located between the Municipal Building and the Municipal Annex, and to the 13 spaces located west of the Municipal Annex. 3 The staff has reviewed the parking requirements for the Municipal Complex using two methods: a) Parking determination based upon the Zoning Code standards (area calculations); b) Parking determination based upon number of employees. Both methods include parking for the six Town vehicles (non-Police vehicles) which are stored on-site at the Municipal Complex. These vehicles are used by the Building, Planning, and Administration Departments. a) Zonin4 Code standards (area calculations): This method utilizes the standard Town of Vail parking requirements listed in the Zoning Code, which are based on square footage measurements. In addition to the Municipal offices, the analysis also includes some office areas currently occupied by the Police Department, which would be utilized for other Municipal offices, once the Police move into the new addition. Due to the unique nature of the Police Department's staffing needs, and the shift overlaps, the parking requirement for this department is based upon the "worst case",scenario of numbers of employees and vehicles. Please see the attached report of the Police Department's staffing and parking analysis. Overall, the planning staff's analysis using this method indicates that a total of 96 parking spaces will be required to meet the project's needs. Since the proposed number of parking spaces with the new Police addition is 109, there would be 13 spaces available for use by the general public, using this method of calculation. b) Number of em~lovees: This method determines the parking requirement based upon the number of current employees working on-site at the existing Municipal Complex (including the proposed Police addition). This calculation assumes a "worst case" situation where there is a full Town staff and all employees have reported to work. It should be noted that this scenario does not include any of the existing conference spaces (including the Council Chambers), which - attributed 10.9 parking spaces to the "area calculation" method as described above. The staff's analysis using this method indicates that a total of 105 parking spaces will be required to meet the project's needs. 4 Since the proposed number of parking spaces available is 109, there would be 4 spaces available for use by the general public, using this method of calculation. In summary, it is anticipated that there would be approximately 4-13 parking spaces available for use by the general public, depending upon which calculation method is used. e. Setbacks: The following table indicates the minimum building setbacks from all property lines, (existing and proposed conditions): Existino Proposed North: 0.0' 0.0' South: 7.6' 7.6' East: 353.0' 190.0' - to building 106.0' - to surface parking West: 116.0' 116.0' f. Building Areas: The following table outlines the different areas of the proposed Police addition: Office (gross areas) Common-storage, Parkins/Circulation stairs. elevator. mechanical Lower Level: 3,443 sq. ft. 2,188 sq. ft. 10,530 sq. ft. Upper Level: 14,387 sq. ft. 1,431 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 17,830 sq. ft. 3,619 sq. ft. 10,530 sq. ft. Total gross area of new Police Department = 31,979 square feet 5 III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 18.60 of the Town's Municipal Code, the Department of Community Development recommends approval of the Conditional Use .permit based upon the following factors: 1. Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the Town. The Town of Vail Land Use Plan has identified the Municipal Complex - site as being in the land use category entitled Public/Semi-Public. This _ category includes schools, post offices, water and sewer storage facilities, cemeteries, municipal facilities, and other public institutions. The staff believes that the following goals and policies bf the Land Use Plan are applicable to the Municipal Complex and the proposed Police addition: 6.1 -Services should keep pace with increased growth. 6.2 -The Town of Vail should play a role in future development through balancing growth with services. 6.3 -Services should be~adjusted to keep pace with the needs of peak periods. The Recreation Trails Master Plan indicates that pedestrian crosswalks should be provided immediately adjacent to the Municipal Complex. Additionally, the Recreation Trails Plan indicates that a sidewalk should be located along the south side of the South Frontage Road, from. the Vail National Bank east to the Alpine Standard service station. To aid in pedestrian safety and access to the Municipal Complex, two pedestrian crosswalks are proposed as a part of the Police addition. One crosswalk is proposed to be located to the northeast of the Scorpio Condominiums and would direct pedestrians to the new pedestian entry into the Municipal Building, facing the South Frontage Road. Additionally, a sidewalk would be added along the south side of the Frontage Road from the new crosswalk, east to the Alpine Standard service station. It is intended that the main pedestrian access to the new Police addition will be via the existing Municipal Building west entry. All public parking is proposed to be located between the Municipal Annex and the existing Municipal Building. It is intended that public access to the Police addition will primarily be from the existing western entrance to the Municipal Building, and secondarily, from the new pedestrian entry, 6 which would be adjacent to the proposed elevator tower on the south side of the project. To further facilitate pedestrian access around the south side of the Municipal Building, a new sidewalk is proposed which would tie the new pedestrian entry with the existing surface parking lot to the west of the Municipal Building. 2. The effect of the use on light and air, distribution of population, transportation facilities, utilities, school, parks and recreation facilities, and other public needs. The staff believes that the proposed expansion to the Vail Police Department would meet a public need in providing a more efficient public service and, more importantly, the expansion would bring the facility into compliance with the existing Federal standards regarding jails. 3. The effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from street and parking areas. Vehicular access/CDOT access permit -The vehicular entrance into the Police parking garage, and into the eastern-most surface parking lot, is proposed to be located in approximately the same location as the existing, eastern-most parking lot entrance. The project landscape architect, Sherry Dorward, has been communicating with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) regarding the required State access permit. Additionally, the CDOT has indicated that they would allow the placement of landscaping within the State's right-of-way. Incorporated into the landscaping and grading plan are the State's guidelines for maintaining a 30' clear zone from the edge of asphalt. The surface parking lot to the east of the Police addition has been designed to accommodate snow storage and snow removal. The project addresses pedestrian safety and convenience in that crosswalks and sidewalks are included in the project, per the Recreation Trails Plan. Two new crosswalks would be installed on the South Frontage Road. A sidewalk would be installed along the south side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, east to Vail Road (curb & gutter will also be necessary). A sidewalk would also be installed on the north side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, west to the western crosswalk (curb & gutter will be necessary and possibly a storm sewer to carry drainage). Although the Recreation Trails Plan calls for a sidewalk along the full length of the South Frontage Road, the staff believes that the sidewalks which are proposed as a part of this project are reasonable in that the sidewalks would provide complete 7 pedestrian access to all pedestrian entries of the Municipal Complex. The proposed sidewalks would meet the Town's standards, as designated in the Streetscape Master Plan, and would be a minimum width of 6' and would be constructed with concrete unif pavers. As with all the elements of this project, the final design of the crosswalks and the sidewalks will require Design Review Board approval. The staff believes that a signage plan for the entire Municipal Complex should be included in this project. The plan should specifically direct the public to the appropriate parking lots and to the primary entrance into the Municipal Building. 4. Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to the surrounding uses. Building footarint/oeneral layout -The staff believes that the overall site planning for the Police addition works well given the narrowness of the project site. The proposed building has been designed so that it steps back from the South Frontage Road, as indicated in the southeast corner of the project. The building continues to have a zero setback along the north property line, and the staff feels that the reduced scale of the building, coupled with a very strong landscape plan, can mitigate the building's close proximity to the north, and the adjacent I-70 eastbound off-ramp. It should also be noted that the edge of asphalt for the South Frontage Road is located approximately 20 feet further south of the southern-most property line of the Municipal Complex. Hence, the "perceived south setback" would be more in the range of 28-30 feet. Mass and bulk/scale and' compatibility with the existing Municipal Buildina and with the surrounding area -The staff believes that the proposed design of the Police addition achieves a scale which is very compatible with the existing Municipal Building, and with the adjacent structures in the area. We believe that the design team's responsiveness to the comments and concerns expressed at prior work sessions by the PEC, the DRB and the staff is very positive. The staff believes that the facade modifications to the existin4 Municipal Building, which are indicated on the elevation drawings, should be a part of this project. We believe these changes are necessary to architecturally tie the new addition with the existing structure. In addition, we also believe that modifications will also need to be made to the existing western entry of the Municipal Building so that it is clear to . the public that this is the primary entry into the Municipal and Police Building. These changes to the primary entry are indicated on-the west elevation drawings. 8 Building materials - As proposed, the building materials for the Police addition would be compatible with the existing Municipal Building and with the alpine character of Vail. Stucco and wood are proposed to be the siding materials, and the roofing material is designed to match the existing Municipal Building (gravel). The retaining wall which is proposed to be located on the north side of the eastern-most surface parking lot would be faced with stucco to match the building. Parkina -The two methods of calculating the parking requirement for the project, as indicated in the parking analysis above, indicate a difference of nine parking spaces. The staff is recommending that the PEC utilize the most conservative approach when determining the parking requirement for the proposed Police addition. We would recommend that the PEC review the parking analysis utilizing the "number of employees" approach, which would require a total of 105 parking spaces for all the municipal functions on-site. Overall, there would be exactly the same number of parking spaces as currently exists on-site (109 spaces). Although the overall number of Town employees is not proposed to be increased beyond the existing level, it should be noted that the proposal suggests that the new structured parking, and the eastern-most surface parking lot, be used exclusively as secured Police parking. The existing eastern-most surface parking lot is currently utlilized by the Police, as well as by Town employees who work in other departments within the Municipal Complex. The staff has some concern about a potential parking shortage if all non-Police Municipal employees, as well as the general public, are required to park west of the Municipal Building. It may be appropriate to designate some Town of Vail employees to park in the eastern-most surface parking lot to utilize these spaces as much as possible and to reduce parking congestion in the other two parking lots. The Police Department is in the process of conducting a "parking study" for the Municipal Complex. Parking lots are currently being monitored and all vehicles are being counted and license plates are recorded to determine if the vehicle belongs to a member of the Town staff, or if the vehicle is a "public" vehicle. This information should be available for Monday's PEC hearing. In addition to this work, the staff is recommending that a parking analysis for the entire Municipal Complex be performed upon completion and occupancy of the Police addition. The intent of this parking analysis would be to determine the types of users and occupancy percentage of all the Municipal parking spaces. Based on the results of this study, it may be possible to have some Town of Vail municipal employees park in the east lot if it is determined that the Police Department does not utilize all of the east lot spaces. This would in turn open up more spaces for the public in the central lot. 9 The staff would insure that the PEC be updated on the results of this analysis. Setbacks/Landscaoinq -Essentially, the staff believes that the proposed setbacks are reasonable. We feel that the proposed landscaping and grading plan strongly buffers the proposed Police addition from the north, as well as from the south. A total of 75 new trees are proposed to be added (25 evergreens and 50 deciduous), and 100 new shrubs. Most of the existing vegetation that would be disturbed as a result of the new construction would be relocated, and all attempts will be made to . insure that the vegetation survives the transplanting. F~lease see the attached site plan for the specific planting and grading design. Staff believes that additional landscaping should be installed adjacent to the Municpal Building and the Municipal Annex, and the central and west parking lots, as a part of this project. This additional landscaping would be located between these areas and the CDOT right-of-way to the 4 north. Snow storage needs, as well as the helicopter access to the landing pad, would be accommodated in the landscape design. This landscaping will help to screen the central and west parking lots as well as the Municipal Building and Municipal Annex. Trash Facility -The proposal calls for the trash facility to be located immediately to the west of the Police parking entrance. The trash storage area would be completely enclosed and truck access to this area would be via a 50' long driveway. The driveway to the trash facility would be heavily screened by landscaping. Many other options for the location of the trash facility within the new addition were explored, however, due to the Police Department's desire to keep the main parking lot access open at all times for emergency egress, the other options were eliminated from consideration. Compatibility with the existing Municipal Building -The staff believes that the proposed floor layout of the Police addition will be compatible with the existing Municipal Building, as the main hallway through the existing _ Municipal Building will be at the same elevation as the upper floor of the Police Building. The main lobby for the Police Building is also proposed to be located on the upper floor to facilitate public access. Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAI - An elevator is proposed to be added to the Police addition and would be located just southeast of the existing interior stairs in the Municipal Building. The location of the new elevator is situated such that both levels of the existing Municipal Building, as well as both levels of the Police addition, will be completely accessible to disabled persons. Noise/Exhaust fans from parkino garage -The exhaust fans are proposed to be located on the north elevation of the new Police addition. 10 The detailing of the garage exhaust/intake is designed to be "louvered" and would be located on the north elevation. Substantial quantities of screen plantings are proposed to be located between the Interstate and the Police addition. In addition, any noise generated by the exhaust fans will need to meet the Town of Vail's noise standards. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommendation of the request for a Conditional Use permit for an expansion to the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department, is for approval with conditions. Staff believes that the proposal meets the Conditional Use permit review criteria as indicated in Section III of this memorandum. Staff is recommending the following conditions of approval: 1) That a Colorado Department of Transportation access permit be secured prior to the Town's issuance of any building or grading permits for the project. 2) That the proposed architectural modifications to the existin4 Municipal Building, as depicted on the north, south and west elevation drawings, be a part of the Police addition. 3) That a parking analysis for the entire Municipal Complex be performed upon completion and occupancy of the Police addition. The intent of this parking analysis would be to determine the types of users and occupancy percentage of all the Municipal parking spaces. This analysis would allow the Town staff to better understand the parking situation at the Municipal Complex and would provide the staff with the necessary information to fully utilize all the available parking spaces. The staff would insure that the PEC be updated on the results of this analysis. 4) That the project be reviewed to insure compliance with the adopted Building and Fire Codes of the Town of Vail. Preliminary code reviews have indicated that it may be necessary to sprinkle the existing Municipal Building as a part of the new construction for the Police addition. 5) That the following items be included as a part of the Police addition: • Two new crosswalks on the South Frontage Road. • A sidewalk on the south side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, east to Vail Road (curb & gutter will also be necessary). • A sidewalk on the north side of the Frontage Road, from the eastern crosswalk, west to the western crosswalk (curb & gutter will be necessary and possibly a storm sewer to carry drainage). 11 6) That additional landscaping be installed as a part of the Police addition. This additional landscaping would be located between the Municipal Complex and the CDOT right-of-way to the north. The landscaping would extend the length of the northern property line of the Municipal Complex, while still allowing ` for snow storage and helicopter access. 7) That a signage plan for the entire Municipal Complex be submitted and approved by the Design Review Board. The plan should specifically direct the public to the proper parking lot and to the primary entrance into the Municipal Building. pec~rnemoslpolice.222 .K 12 TOWN OF VAIL MUNICIPAL COMPLEX MASTER PLAN POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS ' Mid Day 5wing DIVISION Watch 1 O'!ap Watch 2 O'lap Watch 3 O'!ap Adrninistratian szoo-~ v33o-o800 0~3~-1~3o r~oo•i33o r~oo-o;oo zuo-o3o0 Chief of Police - I ~ I - ' Staf( - I ! ! - Staff Support lieutenant - I I I - Staff $erfieant - ~ ~ ! I - ° 'Records ~ ¢ 3 2 ~ .I Communications I ~ 3 S Z- 3 4acrations ' CRIME PREVt+~T.OFC, - I I I Patrol Lt. ! ! I - Investigation S~,r. - I _ 1 1 - Patrol 3 9 6 i 3 !o Investigations _ - 3 3 - - Community Ser. Z f3 g ~ ~ TC?TALS _ ~ 39- ~ 32 '38 I } 1'f' Maximum Overlap Parking Rcyuired at maximum overlap - 38 ResPrveJ Volunteers - - Marl<ed Police Cars - 13 Unmarked Police Cars - ~ 3 Impound/ Others = ~ TOTAL POLICE PARKING = S~ VISI"fOR PARKING = - TOTAL PARKING = SS i ~ ~ . • ~xs~; K~ Paop.j • .C ~ ~,~..,..,.,z :aat i rrw aa:r ~ 1 I I~ I r st' r,:? r I t r',IG~*~O 1 . ' /wACd-~: ~ 1 N Kt ~i - ~ti 1 ``y MJL/ t~ I ~ /~+-r~%Y~ w.s~ra ~ Al ri.~/riC..e I .rJr~ ' ~n ~2 rritYirr.T I ~-~f . L r ~1f l~G II tx-7'r' - ~ .!n 21 ~Lb t~ FWa)~\~~ 41 _:iZ 'S _ is ~ 1 ? ~ 1S 2f LOV _ _ ~ aee 1~ ~ , • Q p~j~ G~ »ro.en.av! Nt, - ~ a ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ (t ~ ~ fer.OR 1~ ~1~ S ~ t ~a a2lr. ~ ~ 1 1 }t .I~ .fit 1 1 ~~l n•M W .I Il.Jn / ar~J."' ~ r ar 1 I 't ,~~~/~t~ 111 YV 1ri ,y: 6>ritK'r sr.~.~' ~r~ gt7j?,° ~ 7~r.,y rtvMVy ~ - - . j1 a~ • v'" r ~ G~GM4MLJG I ! o ~ 14 tif. ~~cqs~ Scc s~~ IAN .~Q . ~(~s:~nr Re„~x~ r}cceirl ~'`K'NJ . IEx~s~.•N~ PRoPese,( • ~ ~ _ - 14 ~ T • 1 ~C . ~ /;a:s Lo r~~ i ~ ~ ~o. ~ sos ~ ~cc.. ~-La4L, wmvC~ H. v. A. G. /u~ayg4ru?- ? ~ Lo X y i «I~_ ~iGOY •110 t ~ MTK•+rS /Mn IaCtlaJ •tv~sJ.. I .;.L~.a. ~I 6~~~ - o SIOl ~.~-rl ' 1 /:t16 JLT. r` %4 { RC ~?.Y. Y I •7~ ~°r~'1°1°y 1°tr .orP 1 y _ / NL.`.°' rvlJ'iuCr .~I` TPNi!/IICt I 55T ~ 5GF !u• .y,o st I ~i)oY c1 ar. rH Y fS~ 1 6~ cu ~ • ~ f 1 , 1 , 1 5 oR. Ian,{. _ _ • pti ~ y 1 u~4. , OUY,~~'LciVANrr etc.- !ov J n>rty /Mr*i! ngn,c I Fr,•~q' a ~ ~ ' ~ /a'YR7Y./F • xr Gov /,ov 1 I,c?' I...,e:v,•f _ 1 7b53!" nrr l o / i 1 ~ - ~ ,o ~ A~uTARYiC . 1. ~ ~ ILII H ~ ' - - - CL~ ~ ' . Yxr:r~ . ``P~+{7' r/rysJN ~ r ' 3Y r{r ACC ~Jf/ST/?Vh ._L.rL~_/_ -Gt~//~/!G Ii'r.. , DS~iCN - fGO~ 1 Gt~K N/U/AL euv9aaeT4//~ _ ~ i v/z - - ~`.Q' io F • pJ. ~ - ' • 1 r?. :off , ,f ~ i .t. ~ V ~ _ 11L^ t.1~(.~,/fk~l i I ~ t4:s:.~JI. . D~7ec7LV~;, 5~7;t1 u• ~ UN9` L7• LT. /aKn/.•Y,x / 2 3 4 //1 Y• IWY /SOY /S~[.; (J r, C7:/ G1 41 Gi )~..•l • • N 'Jf IV 11 ,,1913 T _ 1 .-~iY'+i s i i r Yt_~.•~-_-k_r ~l A 1° 1 y :.~;1 t ~f~:~~ r ~ ' ,=ice 7 ~ .y _ i. iLr~fYl ~ 1__ ~~~i~"'~-`f. { 1 # - .vr~~t ~ S.~ rl:• .N.x~ ~ .1+~ t. 0~,:,: ~ ~~1 .rte.;-.. ' ~jp'' ~ ~ : ~'S''~ '€,~ti`;~ {;yt;k r_ ail ~:j{f ;tom;. ~ 1, .h. ' ~j, x"~`I. tv~i-. _ i~ t~i _~1~y~ ~ 'L • . _y~'~`~-..•~ ~:T ~4L- l.~fXFM~ DIJF~.'_v t S p~!'h~ ~~P~~4~~oN n Fil. 64Y' L ' j± + ~ sT?s-~1 o~i~T-* - . • •W'--~, ~ k_._...~ , F :.l',:' - r;.~ I ~ ,c'~~. ~ ~ . i~ r '~f ; . j~is~i ~ ~ `i r ~ ~~L . .i i. ~ 't .>i-- - ~ - - _ r_..+. ~ ( i.} ':.I ~ ft'~jrj ~ t r~i j..1 1 , :3. cr i11. ,~rlr } ~ qq ' .,~-.~--.:~.~>.'yi'•5 'f'~^_~` ,.t.:.~.~ .Fl.~!1 ~ I Est ~ , Ct ~ ' %t't t• ~Z~;~. =,~.~b to .tom X.,:: va/, vw~n 1..: f f i.J - J _ j ~ - _i'~'C~5 ~ a, s 7- . ~ r sy r ;L ~ 'S~ i~af~r~ 4 ~~,,,,a• ? 't E Y~ y °'-T ! f ~ } Y^ 7 ~r.Y n~ 4 / /lf!' N'1~LL e'` ! - tr° --..c~ ' - ~ .mss y d'° ^ ~:~~~"ti"~;y~ i ~ 'i A L + i f~~~~,~i•' Jry: .~._.n Ian/ .,.1.- s •1i IJ '1 'fir-i..~:~~ _ fi { ~ I ~ •-..-:.l~c..~.src s , i ~ ; f (Iv low,' .~7/-7 `~l:-r M E M O RAN D U M TO: Town Council FROM: Ken H DATE: March 2, 1993 RE: Cost Analysis: Police Department Expansion - Planning Commission/Community Development Recommendations On February 22, 1993, the Planning and Environmental Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit request for the Police expansion. The motion, however, contained ten (10) conditions - most of which are not included in our approved budget. The cost of each condition will be given in the same order as outlined in Mike Mollica's memo of March 2, 1993. 1) Access Permit No Cost 2) Architectural Modifications to Existing Building $103,000 3) Parking Analysis No Cost 4) Fire Code Compliance $ 3.1,500 5) a) Cross Walks (depends on CDOT requirements) $0 - 15,000 b) South side sidewalk and improvement $ 10,000 c) North side sidewalk and improvements Included 6) Additional Landscaping/north side $20,000 7) Signage Plan $ 5,000 8) West Lot Parking No Cost 9) TOV Employee Parking Study In House 10) East Lot Surface Parking No Cost Total PEC Add-Ons $184,000 Plus Design Fees In addition, a number of other items have been discussed as follows: 1) Owners Representative: $40,000 - to be funded out of existing budget 2) Rebuild roof of existing Municipal Building: $80,000 plus design fees 3) Increase structure for future additional level addition: $300,000 plus engineering costs As discussed at a previous council meeting, the PEC add-ons are not intended to be funded out of the existing project budget. The council vote was to increase the project budget should the Council decide to accept the PEC conditions. It should be noted that any additional "hits" to the project budget will require a complete redesign of the addition and remodel at additional design costs. It is, therefore, recommended that the Council adhere to their previous decision to increase the budget to accommodate their desired PEC conditions. PARKING ANALYSIS: FEB. 15-19, 1993 Weekly Peaks & Averages with Totals and Conclusions EAST WEST TIME 9:00 11:00 2:30 5:00 Avg 9:00 11:00 2:30 5:00 Avg TOTAL POLICE Weekly Peak ~ 24 I 24 I 25 + 21 I 24 8 8 9 9 9 33 Weekly Avg. ~ 22 ~ 22 ' 22 + 19 ~ 22 6 ~ 7 ' 7 I 8 ~ 7 I 29 I ~ I ~ ~ I I OTSER TOV ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I Weekly Peak ~ 13 I 11 ~ 13 I 9 I 12 31 I 29 ~ 25 I 25 I 28 I 40 Weekly Avg. ~ 10 I 8 ~ 9 ~ 7 I 9 27 I 25 ~ 23 24 I 25 I 34 I ~ I I ~ I I OTSER/PQBLIC ~ I ~ I I I ~ I Weekly Peak ~ 3 5 ~ 6 I 4 ~ 5 ~ 6 I 10 I 10 ~ 18 + 11 I 16 Weekly Avg. ~ 2~ 3 ~ 3 I 2~ 3 ( 4 I 7 ~ 8 I 9 7 I 10 I I ( I I I I I Total Peaks ~ 40 40 I 44 I 34 ~ 40 45 I 47 I 44 I 52 , 47 87 Total Averages 34 33 34 ~ 28 ~ 33 37 I 39 I 38 I 41 I 39 72 Conclusions• Based on Peak Based on Ava. Police Needs: 33 + 16 = 49 29 + 16 = 45 Other TOV Needs: 40 + 6 = 46 34 + 6 = 40 Other/Public: 16 = 16 10 = 10 111 95 * Caution should be used when viewing these figures based on the fact that this study covered one week only. PARKING ANALYSIS: FEB. 15-19, 1993 Total Space Utilization: by Lot, Day, Time; with Daily, Hourly Averages. EAST LOT: TIME 9:00 11:00 2:30 5:00 Average (Monday 30 33 16 32 28 (Tuesday 39 45 35 29 37 Wednesday 34 32 37 26 33 Thursday 30 35 33 25 31 (Friday 34 31 37 28 33 (Average 34 36 32 28 33 WEST LOT: TIME 9:00 11:00 2:30 ~ 5:00 Average Monday 33 32 34 19 30 Tuesday 41 42 37 38 40 (Wednesday 38 45 42 42 42 (Thursday 35 38 36 43 38 (Friday 39 35 41 35 38 (Average 38 39 38 35 38 ~r r PARKING ANALYSIS: FEB. 15-19, 1993 East Lot Totals: by Day, Time; with Daily, Hourly Averages TIME 9:00 11:00 2:30 5:00 Average POLICE Monday 21 22 17 21 20 Tuesday 24 23 23 20 23 Wednesday 24 24 25 19 23 Thursday I 19 21 22 16 I 20 Friday I 21 I 18 I 22 I 20 I 20 Average I 22 I 22 I 22 I 19 I 21 I I 1 OTHER/TOV Monday ~ 8 9 , 8 9 9 (Tuesday I 13 9 I 8 7 9 Wednesday ~ 7 5 ~ 6 I 3 ~ 5 Thursday I 8 8 , 9 7 + 8 Friday ~ 13 I 11 13 9 12 (Average I 10 I 8 9 7 I I OTHER/PUBLIC I I Monday I 1 I 2 I 1 I 2 2 Tuesday ~ 2 ~ 3 I 4 I 2 3 Wednesday ~ 3 I 3 I 6 I 4 I 4 Thursday ~ 3 ~ 5 ~ 2 ~ 2 ( 3 Friday 1 0 ~ 2 ~ 2 2 I 2 Average 2 3 3 2 I PARKING ANALYSIS: FEB. 15-19, 1993 West Lot Totals: by Day, Time; with Daily, Hourly Averages TIME 9:00 11:00 2:30 5:00 Average POLICE Monday 5 6 6 6 6 Tuesday 8 7 9 8 8 Wednesday 7 8 7 7 8 Thursday 6 5 6 9 7 Friday 6 7 7 - 7 Average 6 7 7 8 7 OTHER/TOV (Monday I 25 21 21 8 19 (Tuesday I 31 27 23 25 27 (Wednesday I 28 I 29 25 17 25 (Thursday I 23 I 23 23 19 22 (Friday I 29 I 26 25 - 27 (Average I 27 , 25 I 23 I 24 I 24 (OTHER/PUBLIC I (Monday 3 I 5 I 7 I 5 ( 5 (Tuesday I 2 I 8 I 5 I 5 I 5 (Wednesday I 3 I 8 I 10 I 18 I 10 (Thursday I 6 I 10 I 7 I 5 I 7 (Friday I 4 I 2 ( 9 I - I 5 (Average I 4 i 7 ~ 8 I 9 ~ 7