Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993-04-06 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
NAIL TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1993 10:00 A.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. Site Visit: Vail Village Core Area Loading/Delivery Zone. 2. Discussion Re: Vail Village Core Area Loading/Delivery Zone. 3. Site Visit: Lot 41/Glen Lyon/1210 Westhaven Lane. 4. Site Visit: Lot 15/Nail Potato Patch/784 Potato Patch. 5. Adjournment. THE NEXT NAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT NAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT NAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:~AGENDA.TCS NAIL TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1993 10:00 A.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 10:00 A.M. 1. Site Visit: Vail Village Core Area Loading/Delivery Zone. Ken Hughey Tom Sheely Action Requested of Council: (Meet at Council Chambers!) View site in preparation for discussion and review of current plan with interested parties. Consider modifications, if any. (Discussion will begin in Council Chambers immediately following the site visit.) 11:00 A.M. 2. Discussion Re: Vail Village Core Area Loading/Delivery Zone. Ken Hughey Tom Sheely Backaround Rationale: In the fall of 1992, Council gave TOV staff authorization to implement a revised loading and delivery plan in the Vail Village core area. Having now gone through a full winter season, it is appropriate to review and critique this plan. 12:00 P.M. 3. Site Visit: Lot 41/Glen Lyon/1210 Westhaven Lane. Andy Knudtsen Action Requested of Council: View site in preparation for discussion later tonight during the Evening Meeting. Backaround Rationale: The issue to be discussed concerns an appeal of a PEC approval to allow a Type II Employee Housing Unit (EHU) to be constructed on this site. Appellant: Kristen Blume. (Please see the enclosed letter of appeal and the staff memorandum to the PEC. The PEC voted 3-1 to approve the proposal.) 12:20 P.M. 4. Site Visit: Lot 15/Nail Potato Patch/784 Potato Patch. Shelly Mello Action Reauested of Council: View site in preparation for discussion later tonight during the Evening Meeting. Backaround Rationale: The issue to be discussed concerns an appeal of the DRB's March 17, 1993, decision approving the primary unit at this site, finding that all the Design Guidelines had been met. The DRB voted unanimously to approve the request with the condition that the application meet zoning and two recommendation: 1) the applicant amend the landscaping plan to include portions of the adjacent lots, and 2) stone should be added to the lower level. The secondary unit was approved in October of 1991 and is currently under construction. When reviewing the secondary unit, currently under construction, in October, 1991, the applicant provided a schematic building plan for the primary unit to show that access and building connection between the primary and secondary unit had been considered. No approvals were given for the primary unit at that time. Applicant: Loper Development. Appellant: Andy and Lucinda Daly and Mr. and Mrs. George Wiegers. 01:05 P.M. 5. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:UIGENDA.TCS VILLAGE PARKING SURVEY RESULTS As you are already aware we sent out a survey to the merchants in the Village Core area businesses that were impacted the most from the Loading Zone restrictions. The survey was intended only for the businesses since we can assume the delivery people would be solidly against the restrictions. We also did not include the citizen or guest who walk the ski corridor since many may not have past years to compare the changes to and, honestly, we may be the better judge of how well it is working. Total number of surveys sent out were 112. As of March 31st we have received 33 returned surveys or roughly 30%, Question 1 asked if the business community saw an overall improvement on Bridge Street. The results here were clearly in favor of restrictions! 12 - strongly improved appearance 7 - slightly improved appearance 8 - no change 0 - slightly detracted from the appearance 1 - strongly detracted from the appearance 1 - didn't know Question 2 asked the more important issue: Do these restrictions impact your business? 3 - strongly enhances my business 1 - slightly enhances my business 11 - no change 6 - slightly detracts from my business 9 - strongly detracts from my business 2 - didn't know When we compared this to question 6, we found that of the 15 responses that reported the restrictions were either slightly or strongly detracting from their business that 3 are on Bridge Street, 10 are on Gore Creek Drive or Wall Street, and 2 were unknown. Question 3 asked the businesses what level of restrictions they would like to see in the future. 6 - more restrictions 11 - same level 10 - less restrictions 1 - didn't know . u , Questions 4 and 5 concerned the quality of CSO's we had for this ski season and what the expectations were for next year. Question 4 - the Community Safety Officers were: 9 - very friendly 13 - somewhat friendly 4 - somewhat unfriendly 1 - very unfriendly 3 - didn't know Question 5 - next season the CSO's should be: 7 - more persistent on traffic control 13 - have the same approach to traffic control 7 - be less controlling 0 - don't know Questions 6 asked if the business was located on Bridge Street and was only used to validate question 2. The last question asked for the type of business that was responding: 17 - retail 3 - restaurant/bar 5 - service 2 - other Conclusion The results from the survey helped us confirm what our own observations had told us and I think given us some clear direction of what the business community would like in the future. First, we think it is agreed that the restrictions have improved the appearance on Bridge Street. Second, the cost of accomplishing this had an impact on the Gore Creek Drive, Wall Street and Hanson Ranch Road businesses. The " trucks after all had to go somewhere. What we don't know is how severe or what the costs to the businesses were. Third, the businesses expect at least the same level of enforcement or more for next season. This survey seems to indicate that we continue to look for long range solutions to the Truck Loading Zone problem, but improvements have been made. Efforts to manage the traffic congestion on Gore Creek Drive and Hanson Ranch Road should be the next step in the process along with looking for alternative solutions that are cost effective. ~ ~ 64 WINTER 1992-1993 CHEc.xrOINT CHARLIE Vehicle totals comparing 1991/1992 ski season to 1992/1993 November to March. 1991/1992 1992/1993 Reduction November 10,821 4,479 - 6,342 December 15,410 6,915 - 8,495 January 14,293 10,004 - 4,289 February 13,423 7,241 - 6,182 March 15,966 10,524 - 5,442 69,913 39,163 -30,750 town of pail Personal Memo from . Caroline J. Fisher To: Peggy Osterfoss Merv Lapin Bon Buckley Jim Gibson Rob Levine Jim Shearer Tam Steinberg From: Caroline Fisher Date: April 6, 1993 The 1993 Vail Community Survey is progressing nicely. The attached packet will be sent to 9,000 second home owners, residents, and boxholders at the end of the week. Thanks to each of you who gave input last week... Sorry that we were on such a tight timeline. We'll keep you posted on the continuing survey process... We will be conducting 150 random phone interviews in two weeks, with final focus groups to follow. WHAT'S GOING ON AROUND HERE? Where To Find Town Of Vail. News ~ ~~T~LIN~; V~L ~~~i ' Lookingfor the scoop on upcoming meetings, Town Council agendas, special events, and issues facing the Vail TOYY i Y OF lIA1L community? Tune into... Channe1111oreviously Channel 371. the Town of Vail Information Station... Around the clock news and Spring 1993 Bringing You Up to Date on Town of Vail Happenings upcoming meeting information, programmed from the TOV offices! Great jazz listening as well. STAFF CHANGES AT TOV Channel 5 (previously Channe1231. Vail Vallev Community Television... Town Council meetings are aired at r,' "~"r`~ 5:00 PM each Wednesda ,10:0(1 AM each Prida .Also, tune in for TOV Ha enin s a ten minute news broadcast Town Manager & Town Attorney Y Y pP g ~ gin; ~ ~ , bringing you up-to-date on what's going on around the Town at 8:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 10:00 PM, Monday Hdts Wlll Change through Friday. After eight years as town manager, Ron Phillips recently w~~ resigned from his position. Under Ron's leadership, the ~ ICSKh 104.7 FM... Town of Vail Community Update with host Mike Parnell, every other Wednesday at 9:15 AM. Town of Vail embarked on many new avenues and initiated numerousinnovativeprojects.RonPhillipsextendsaheartfelt ~ e TV 8... Town staff and council members join host Karen McElhaney each Tuesday morning at 9:20 AM far a brief thankstoVail residents and emphasizes thatworkingforthis ~ overview of Town of Vail projects. community has been a wonderful and professionally ~ w rewarding experience, ` µ ` . Vail Daily and The Vail Trail... In addition to regular coverage of Town Council meetings and other Town stuff, x a both a ers are ex erimentin ~ with ublishin r the week] council a >endas. Please let them know if this is ~ " ~ ~ ~ .wAr P p P b P 1, Y b Overthenextfewmonths,Ronwillbeservinginacunsultinl, ~ something you want them to continue. Vail Daily 476-0555; The Vail Trail 827-4004. role for the Town. Public Works'Director Larry Grafel has t ~ t ` ~ ,w , taken on the role of Acting Town Manager while a formal Press releases, vress releases, vress releases... If you would like to receive news hot off the TOV presses, we will search is made for Ron's successor. ~t ~ ,~,.j add you to the press release mailing list. Please call 479-2115. ~~;,1 a In an unrelated change, after fourteen years with the TOV, Town Council Agendas... Would it be helpful for your business or family to receive the Town Council agendas on a Town Attorney Larry Eskwith has decided to leave his post ~ ~ ° regular basis? TOV would be happy to add you to its agenda mailing list. Please ca11479-21Q6. for the private sector. He will be joining the Vail law firm of THE EMPLOYEE HOUSING DILEMMA 3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bailey,Harring&Peterson,amovewhichhasbeeninthe ABALANCINGACT process for over a year. The Town Council will begin its Vail Housing Authority & Town Council Agree On search for both replacements immediately. Multi-Faceted Approach To Local Housing Challenges BULK MAILING Everyone knows tha t a supplyof a (fordable housing isimperative IMPORTANTDATESTOREMEMBER; PERMIT#14 SQLD~~RO~~~OLQNG~IRRY'::f~IVBivNALFOFAGL forUiesuccessofow~valleywidecommiurity,bnttherearespecial VAIL, COLORADO Apr. 30 TOV Community Surveys I)ue-Don't Forget < THIvitiC7LF~Sr11'7HsiTC1V~1ND1Nrrt~:;f~i~CLCO~kIMUN1TY challenges to providing it in VaiL.. Land values are very high; Td Mall Yours TIIr1~KSFQR~4LLTff£lEARSA~DHARDtVOfZI,! nwchofTown-ownedlandwhichcouldbeusedforhousingwas May 15 Town Of Vail Clean-Up Day - A Great Day purchased for presewation as open ,pace; some residents arc To Raise $ For Your Favorite Non-Profit, See opposed to employee housing in their neighborhoods or dori t Local Folks Xop Haven't Seen Since Last Fall, WHAT'S ON YOUR MIND? TOV WANTS TO KNOW believe it is the government's role to be involved. The Vail Spiff Up The Local Environs] It's Community Survey Time Again... Focus Groups, HousingAuthoritybelievesthesohitionliesnotinsimplybuilding Ma 28 S`tunmer Be ins In The Vail Valle more dwelling units, but in amulti-faceted approach including Y ~ Y Mail Questionnaires, and Phone Surveys Will Give The Memorial Day Kickoff Town Council A Glim se Of What You're Thinkin constnution o[ a limited number of deed restricted multi-family June 2,9,16. Town Of Vail Speak Up Meetings p g housing units and incentives for private sector development. June 12-13 Trees for'Vail Prcilect - $poaisored By Over the past few years, the Town of Vai] has implemented Vail-Eagle Valley Rotary&TheTQV.GrabA anumberofavenuestosolicitcitizeninputandinvolvement, The Housing Authority has moved forward slowly with Shovel And Come Help InThe Greening Of including mail surveys, Speak Up meetings, Mayor's development n[ its solutions to the housing challenge. The Vail! POSTAL PATRON Breakfasts, and Citizen Input Cards. However, especially in Authority has moved carefully and thoughtfully to provide a ' June 23 Rdetlie Rockies ReturnsTU Vail Vall, CO 82657 thefaceofAmendmentOne,theneedforpublicittvolvement comprehensive, long term sohition to the current dilemma. A July 4 Vail America Days/July Fourklt Celebration is more crucial than ever. The Town of Vail. takes this need portion of the efforts have been focused ondevelopment offorty- Julyl(l-11 Vail Arts Festival seriously and isimplementingmorecomprehensiveaveriues foura[fordableunitsonapproximatelyfiveacresofTown-owned. July 11-Aug.12Bo1shoi Ballet at Vail Academy Residence ~ for receivin our thou hts, Continued on a e seven landadjacentto theMountain Bellfacility,north oft-70nextto the Aug. 15,18 American Cycle Classic In Vail g Y g ( P g ) ABC School and The Learning Tree. (Continued on page seven) Aug. 15-17 Jerry Ford Invitational And Celebrity Golf Tournan~nt IN THIS ISSUE... Vail's Environment & TOV ........................................................6 Staff Changes l Vail's Library - Tlie Place to Bc .................................................8 Employee Housing Update ........................................1 From the Police Department Files ............................................1(1 y \ ~ Community Survey Time 7 Loading & Delivery in Vail Village .........................................,11 Issue Briefs 2 Where to Find TOV News..........................................................12 What's Up with Amendment 1 3 TOV Telephone Connection Insert What's New with flte Bus S stem 4 1993 Conununit Surve r~~~ T~ r Y y y .....................................................Insert All Dateline: Town of Vail photographs provided by Scott Martin TOYY 1V OF VAIL TOV Public Works Projects 5 AIPP Donation Card Insert 1 Ski Season Sales Tax Figures Are Looking Up... While ~ . Y.. IF ONLY WE HAD ALLEYS year end sales tax figures for 1992 showed an ~ ' ~ • unimpressive 2% increase over the previous year, the ~ > r ~ ~ ; The Town Council Im lements A New Loadin & Delive Plan 1992-93 winter season's sales tax figures are booming ' 3~ . ~ In Vail Vilage... And Wants To Hear Your Feedback • November showed a 16% increase over the same month ~ ~ ram ~ N ~ ~A l .t the previousyear,Decembera9%increase,andJanuary • ` ~ "If onlywe had alleys." How many times has this , 7.5%, PreliminaryFebruarytotalsarecominginat1.68% ~ E~' ~ overFebruary 1992. The increase over last year has been ~ ~,r h'"~ss exclamation echoed through the corridors of Vail t ~ ~ ~„~,M Villa e? Maintainin the edestrian nature of the attributed to outstanding snow and increased nation- C° ss,~ ~ g • g p ~ M' ~ wide economic confidence. • ' Village core has been a challenge in the face of ~ increased visitor numbers and rowin levels of A Safer Way To Peddle Through Dowd Junction.. ~X ~ ~x ~ g g ~ ~ ~ activity. In 1992 alone, over 150,000 vehicles ~ r E l i Construction of a recreation path adjacent to this precarious stretch of interstate will begin this summer. ~ ~ approached Checkpoint Charlie for one reason or ~ After hard work and lobbying on the part of Town w.~ another. ~ ~ ; Councilandstaff,theStateofColoradoapproved$875,000 ¢ M to su ort the ro'ect. The Town of Vail committed f Imes onseto rowin conceinsfrombothresidents • PP p 1 ~ t P g $ ~ t ~ - • $225,000 of remaining funds toward the path design and and guests, the Vail Town Council implemented a • right-of-way purchases. ~ ~ new compromise loading and delivery plan in Vail • Transportation Center Art Project In Home Stretch... The Art in Public Places Board continues to Village. The new plan, currently in the trial stage, diverts as many cars as possible to the Village Parking • move forward with the illuminated 8 toot by 10 foot glass block artwork to be placed at the south Structure and helps keep large trucks off Bridge Street. The goal is to preserve the aesthetic and • entrance of the Village Transportation Center. A total of $65,750 has been raised, with $13,000 environmental quality of the Village core. The Town Council views the plan as flexible and welcomes • left to o. • g comments and suggestions regarding its improvement. • Thanks to the Vail Valley Foundation, the Tang Fund, US West, and nu merous individual sources, A • the piece has been cast and is slated Eor installation in July. Dedication is planned for August. Dan GOT A DELIVERY TO MAKE? CHECKPOINT CHARLIE • Dailey, an artist from New Hampshire, was selected from a field of 1,200 to produce this piece that CHECK OUT THE REVISED IS GETTING LESS BUSINESS... • will greet millions of residents and guests each year. If you would like to contribute to this project VILLAGE PARKING AND DELIVERY PLAN FORTUNATELY • in the fundraising home stretch, please call Shelly Mello at the TOV Community Development ' • Department, 479-2138, or return the enclosed pledge card with your donation. A permit should be obtained from Checkpoint • Charlie for the use of any Vail Village loading ThenumbersofvehiclesapproachingCheckpoint • Town Council Working To Snag Property In West Vail... The Town Council is in the final stages zones, currently located on Gore Creek Drive, Charlie before and after implementation of new • of purchasing six acres of land west of the Branders Building, frequently known as the Vail Hanson Ranch Road, and Vail Road. loading and delivery procedures are as follows: • Commons property. The $3.2 million approved for the purchase was derived from last year's bond New 30 minute loading zones are now provided • refinancing. The acreage will be maintained for future public purposes, including possible open in the Village Parking Structure to facilitate quick 1991 1992 • space,employeehousing,aWestVailfirestation,and/orretailspaceforapublic/privatesectorjoint errands and deliveriesofsmallpackages. • venture. ParkingintheBridgeStreetloadingzoneisrestricted November 10,821 4,479 • to 15 minutes between 6:00 AM and 8:30 AM. • RETT Figures Go Gangbusters! VaiPs Real Estate Transfer Tax figures for 1992 posted the second ~ December 15,410 6,915 • highest mark ever with a year end total of $1,991,996. December alone brought in $441,833, the TheloadingzoneonGoreCreekDriveinfmntofthe January 14,293 10,004 • biggest month since the enactment of the tax in 1980. The largest annual RETT sum was posted in Lodge Promenade is available for deliveries and • 1989, with a total oE$2,044,638. Funds brought in by this tax are used for the purchase of open space pick-ups between 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM; all other February 13,423 7,241 • within Vail and for park and recreation path development/maintenance. loading zones are available from 6:00 AM to _ _ • 6:00 PM. 53,947 28,639 • TownOfVailExperimentsWithNaturalFuelsInItsFleet...TheTOVhasbeenexploringnumerous IS IT WORKING? • options for converting its fleet to natural gas capability. As a trial case, the Public Service Company PLEASE LET US KNOW! 479-2352 (Sergeant Sheely) • is working with the TOV to retrofit two trucks. A Hato raj gas fueling station is being installed at the • Public Works Town Shops. If this test case is successful, the Town will be looking at the possibility • of converting other trucks and buses to operate on natural fuels. • The Proposed Vail Cemetery Is No Dead Issue.,. The upper bench of Donovan Park was selected Ride the Rockies Returns to Vail! • as the site for the community's cemetery, with Humorous resident meetings held last fall regarding The tour will be stopping overnight in Vail on Wednesday, June 23,1993, following its century ride (100 miles!) from • its design. Alpine International, represented by Sherry Dorward and Eldon Beck, was selected as the Steamboat Springs. The riders will be camping overnight in Ford Park and at the athletic Geld, with indoor campers • lead landscape architectural firm. Agreement was achieved that the development should be positioned in the Golden Peak area. Entertainment will include Vail Associates' hosting breakfast and lunch and a food • extreme) com atiblewiththenaturalenvimnmentandincons icuoustothe asset-b .The Town fair resentedb local arearestaurateurs.Additional) ,theWalkerWilliamsBand countr -western wi1lrreetthec lists • Y p p P Y P Y Y ~ Y ) g Y Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board support the Minturn Cemetery District Wednesday afternoon and the VailVatleyFoundationwillprovideafreeHotSummerNightsconcertintheAmphitheater • thatevenin Localsareinvitedtocome ocnthefun!CallPamBrandme Erat479-2113 if ouareinterestedinvoluntecrin • acting as the operators of this facility and the issue will likely go to a vote in November,1993. For g• 1 y' Y g more information, please call Andy Knudtsen at the Community Development Dept., 479-2138. or would like additional information. • 2 11 AMENDMENT ONE... FROM THE P.D. FILES.. ~ Some Think They Love It, Some Think They Hate It, Some Have No Idea What To Think ~ Governments throughout the state are scrambling to interpret and apply Amendment One to their budgeting. Some believe, since the measure was approved at the state level, all governments should implement its provisions without questions; others believe the overall intent is good, but the specifics could be very detrimental to resort economics such as ours; still others are downright confused by the law's contorted language and don't know what to think. Certain aspects of the amendment present big challenges for the Vail economy. Example; The requirement that all A Compromise Expansion Plan Will Bring The Department Up To Code And Give A Bit Of Additional Space surpluses in revenue be returned to the taxpayer. Since 50`~~ of Vail's revenue is generated by sales tax paid primarily by guests, returning this revenue to the people who paid it would be difficult if not impossible. Example: The amount of As Well... The Vail Town Council recently approved a $3 million expansion artd renovation of the Vail Police spending increases allowed each year are tied to Denver's Consumer Price Index. Is it wise to base Vail's service levels Department building. The project budget was trimmed by $2.7 million from the original proposal and will bring on Denver's economy, which is not 100% dependent upon tourism? Example:. The amount of spending increases allowed various aspectsofthedepartment up tocodeand regulatorystandards, aswell asprovide forcurrentspace needs. each year are based on the previous year's revenues. The problem with this occurs if one year we have a light snow level The project has been four years in the making and ground breaking is slated for summer of 1993. and revenues (i.e, skier numbers and sales tax figures) arc down. If the following year we have a normal or heavy snow level (i.e., typical skier numbers and sales tax figures), Amendment One will restrict the Town's abilities to provide Vail Valley E-9-1-1 Moves Toward The Year 2000... In the next few months, U.S. West will be installing a new normal service levels. In fact, the previous year's reduced service levels become the maximum TOV is allowed to E-9-1-1 system at the Vail and Eagle dispatch centers which will allow a phone number, physical location, and provide for all future years. This is where the amendment's °ratcheting down" effect comes into play. caller's name to be immediately traced to the point of origin. This new technology is funded through a county Is this confusing? So is Amendment One! phone bill surcharge and will allow each P.D. to send Most people agree that SOME SORT of spending restrictions should be in place; however, they believe that provisions emergency assistance to crime and injuryvictims whoare more applicable to Vail's unique economy should be implemented. Amendment One allows communities to °opt nut" of unable to describe their location. its provisions in favor of different spending restrictions if the voters so approve. .j~ ~ The Town of Vail needs to hear your thoughts on this matter... and now, more than ever, we need voters to be educated Let The Folks With The Badges Help Reduce Your Business Losses... Prevention is the key to a crime-free oil the issues and the impacts. Whether we, as a community, completely stick with Amendment One, or come up with communit and the Vail P.D. will deli 7n a customised alternative spending restrictions which better fit our economy, we need involvement from the public. We need to hear Y b from you how we can better provide informafion and how we can clarify these issues and impacts to best serve and l~ retail loss prevention program specifically foryou. Topics preserve our unique community. n~ covered include shoplifting prevention; internal theft ~ detection and prevention; check and credit card fraud x. a a prevention; and more. Complete with presentations, PROBABLE 1993 AMENDMENT 1 AMENDMENT 1 IMPACTS ON THE ~a~« ~ manuals, andsecurit audit theP.D.willaddressan Ions ~ ~ _ y y BALLOT ISSUE TOWN OF VAIL prevention issue your business might encounter. For more information, please call 479-2213. The following discussion tends to be difficult for non The following is a list of some changes in Town of Vail "beancounters;'butwe'vetriedtoputitintoplainenglish operationswhichareduetothepassageofAmendmentl: Before Leaving Vail, Be Sure To Check The Road Conditions... Call 479-2226 for around the clock regional road {honestly!) • All newTown debt and any new tax must be approved by reports. (Please don't ca]19-I-1! Save that number for emergencies!) Amendment 1 creates a new relationship between the Vail voters. Prior to Amendment One, under the Vail Town's annual revenues and its annual debt service TownChartcr,afewtypesoftaxescouldhavebecnraised Going On Vacation? Let The Vail P.D. Keep An Eye On Your Place... Most folks remember to lock the doors payments. Ifdebtservicepaymentsdropinanyparticular by action of the Vait Town Council. and windows, and to cancel the newspaper before leavingtown.Unfortunately, some Egrget to arrange for a P.D. year, the Town must either refund the related revenue to ~ Vail votersmustbemuch moreinvolvedindecidingupon Vacation Security Check! The Security Check is a free service for all local residents and businesses. For more info the public or receive the voters' permission ro keep the operational and capital spending levels, That is, the level please call 479-221.3, revenue and spend it on services. of some services will be set on an annual basis through During the summer of 1992, the Town Council addressed detailed November ballot issues (please see adjacent Why RiskIt? TakeTime To RegisterThose Skis & Bikes... Yes, although Vail is a relatively safe and secure area, a developing Financial problem by refinancing and article). extendingthcTown sexistingdebtservice. Theresultwas ~ thefts do Deco r. Last year, in tact, almost $55,000 worth of bicycles were stolen, most of which were not registered. The Town of Vail must dramatically increase the amount Although the Police Department recovers many stolen bikes and skis, many are never returned because officers a reduced annual debt service cost which was to be used ofinformationreachingvoters in orderto help them make have no way ofidentifying the owners. }ust stop by the Vail P.D. and #ill out a registration card. You will 6e given on existing services forthe next few years. informed decisions. Town efforts are likely to include stickers for your skis and bikes and, while this doesn't prevent theft, if eiH~er are stolen or lost, the police Under Amendment I's provisions, the Town must now newsletters such as this, presentations to groups, and Department can help identify and return them to you should. they be recovered. Widlout registering these items, receive the voters' approval tospend thesavings from our direct mailers to all voters. In turn, voters must become reduced debt service payments. Therefore, Vail voters moreinvolvedintheprocess-calling,writing,orstopping you have no protection at all. will likely be presented with a November ballot issue on ~ by the Town offices to let their views be known. whetherornottocontinuereceivingcertainspecificTown ~ ~ TheTownofVai]willbeunabletoautomaticall res and Wondering What It`s Like To Be A Cop In Vail? Why Not Spend An Evening Riding Alongside One... The Vail services. The exact service cutbacks will be decided upon y p to local growth. Past growth in visitor numbers has Police Department extends an invitation to all residents for a first hand view of "a day in the life of a Vail cop." incoming months. The department's Ride Along program helps residents better understand the duties of VaiPs police officers and normallybeen accompanied by enough increases in sales If we've done an inadequate job of explaining this issue, taxes to pay for the needed service level increases. has received popularresponsefromboth officers and residents who have participated to date. Please ca11499-2210, please call Steve Barwick at 479-21 lh or Steve Thompson Amendment 1's limitations are designed to keep service at 479-2119. I evels static and will require annual votes for any new or i ncreased scrvices.In fact, Town servicelevels will decrease unless voters approve annual ballot measures, 10 3 A New Home, New Phone Number, New Maps, New Hours... j(T c T T ~T Stay Tuned For Even More Improvements 1` 1 ~ v ~ 0 ~J 1 ~ T ~ A A Thanks To The Support Of Many, Children ANewHome: Beginningthiswinter,theTownofVailbusofficesarelocatedintheVillageTransportationCenter. Have A Special Place In Vail, Colorado T The new location provides more front lines interfacing with riders and convenience for those looking for bus 1 information. Bus schedules, maps, and lost items can be picked up at the new location. In 1990, the Vail Town Council decided to A New Number. Wondering what the schedule is for the West Vail South or East Vail Express buses? No more ~ * scrambling to find that old schedule you tossed in your desk... Ca11328-8143 for around-the-clock bus schedule create a special place within the library Mrs`, ~ ffi information. A total of 741 calls were received on this hotline in February alone! )ust fol' kids... where they could read and New Hours: The Vail Town Council has dramatically expanded the bus system hours over the past three years. play and be comfortable "being kids." a~ " 'f T Busesnowrunfromb:OOAMto2:OOAMonallrouteseachdayduringthewinterandallyearonthein-townshuttle. The councilenvislonedaspacefol'children ~ ~ 1 W The summer outlying buses will run from 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM, instead of the previous three hours in the mornings of all ages which would become a unique, • and afternoons. The Town has also expanded bus office hours fmm 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM on Tuesdays and Fridays. welconling place, reflecting the value ~ a l~ H "y If these hours are successful, they will be implemented on other days each week. whichthe conlmunityplaces on its younger ~ V+ ' ' ~ ; ' New Mans: Do bus schedules scare ou? Then : ' " Y ( generation. ~ , you are not alone!) Pick up one of the new Town ' of Vail bus maps which is color coded for easy ~ Local architects stepped forward along deciphering. The map corresponds conveniently {L*, x ~,M [L~ with the colorcoded schedule on its reverseside. ~ ~ s:~~~,` with a local contractor, the Town of Vail carpenters, and various financial donors... and the The new maps can be picked up at the Vail and ~ adventure began. Customized miniatures of Vail landmarks were designed for furniture, Lionshead Information Booths, most hotels and ~ and children can now curl up with a book within a miniature covered bridge, bus stop, or ~ J lodges, Town of Vail municipal offices, the Vail ~ ~ amphitheater. Glass doors were purchased and etched with drawings of local children, and V Public Library, property management firms, and 1 ` a u et theater was built for shows and stor times. Thanks tothe efforts, enthusiasm, and the Village Transportation Center. p pp y ~j unflagging support of many people, the children of Vail have a room of their own. I , Bilingual Schedule Cards: Bilingual schedule ~ cards are now posted in all bus shelters. Bus Hosts: The Town has continued for a second ~ I year its successful "community volunteer'' host ' program to aid guests loading and unloading at T W crowded bus stops. The Town provided a blue ~ L r parking pass to the volunteers in exchange for l`'`/~ their efforts. NewParatransitService:Areyouanindividualwithadisabilityorunabletousethestandardbusserviceforsome ~'~C~ttj,tlC~tt10Z1?It?l~ ~~gnt(rpeS£~1tt~'DT~18~4~~Q~Uit2 ~QD ~Q reason? Don't despair! The Town of Vail now provides free, door-to-door service for those individuals unable to ~ $ ~ utilize the traditional bus service. A van will pick you up at your home, odge, or business and deliver you to your ~t~>' Qi t ~ ~'~j~' ~2~11 Qt C~1l~t~tY'n'S ~1~A' ~1"Q ~BCt • destination. Reservations should be made 24 hours in advance by dialing 479-2174. L • New Community Outreach: The Town of Vail is working hard to communicate to residents and guests to leave Path HQp1~11;5 Bian ~~tt~'~d theircarsathome!Busmapsandschedulesarenowavailableatavarietyoflocations,aslistedabove,andtheTown u~lzyanandY~~od,~c~n~ractor ~11be1~GozlzaleS, I will be increasing its outreach with local reservationists, encouraging them to give bus information to all ~~t~~la~tt~,2I1w71t~1C..: ,T~O11°XbungG~a5~<~tudi0 ' ry individuals booking stays in Vail. 1~~1~~1c~5 p~ tl~~ t~ibr~a'y N11ke ~dwllttg5 Little Known Facts About the Bie TOV Bus Svstem: ~Oll'Hd1;lg~dllE~.: Dr: Herbert $t NirUle Werfheim houndatian * The TOV bus system carried 3.2 million passengers last year, 40,000 on New Year's Eve alone. lUl1C~1c~21 S~11~t~T , , , ; _ ~~bert H~~'rll'+2>C~! 1i~11ttlly * The TOV bus system is the second largest bus system in the state and the largest free system in the country. ~urti5 ~C~raw ~ound~#ion ~~dll ~{Ot#t~l li~I111~y R * 18,000 bus maps were distributed throughout the community during the two week holiday period this year MOl'#"~~ Al"Clit~et6 1~iCh WindlSch 1"anlily alone. 70,000 maps were distributed to residents and guests during 1992. I~dvIC~ 1~0~11t FOtiTiClation Veil Towli ~OU1;C~1,199~ ; * The TOV bus fleet is comprised of 35 buses carrying up to ninety passengers each. Three buses are currently equipped forhandicapped access, with oneparatransit van available for door-to-doorservice. Six replacement ~obll ~alleg45 buses, each accessible for those with disabilities, will join the fleet next year. * The Town will be purchasing buses with perimeter seating as vehicles are replaced. This type of seating will R reduce the loading and unloading time and will provide more space efficiency within each bus (in the TOV's Ar~d+ ~~eotlt"se, t12e. ei'fi1~t'ett O~~ttt` conlntttt2rty utlty pr~vtr~ed tie t32s~tft~ttztz f eternal quest to get more people from point A to point B!!!) Y O AROUNDTHE-CLOCK BU5 SCHEDULE INFO 32$814=3 PARATRANSIT SERVICE 4'79-218 {MADE RESERVATIONS 24 HDQRS I~1 A>7VANCE~ 4 9 UAIL'SLIBRARYIS p ~ ~ "WHAT ARE THEY DOING, HAROLD?" A POPULAR PLACE! w~ ' Mt ~ ~ F g TOV Crews Go 24 Hours a Day 141,179 residents and guests walked through the ~ library doors in 1992, a considerable increase from , ~ . , ~ a . the 98,217 in 199]. As the library's collections grow, ~ t+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Although Have Been Tighter Recently, so too do the numbers of people who drop by to use ~ ~ ; Those Crews Keep Plugging Away J the computers, to explore the vast book and $ periodical collections, or to listen to a (ecture. ~ " ~ ~ • International Bride Refurbishment. The TOV renovated International Brid e and the Q i adjacent pedestrian plaza area this past year. The nearby Gore Creek Promenade will be It started out as a shelf in a local retail store... and ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ today its collections are comprised of over 43,000 ~ a re-landscaped and renovated during 1993, books, records, tapes, 600 videos (including all films which have won an Academy Award for Best Picture since ]960), personal computers, lecture series, • Lionshead Mall Improvements. The fountain area of Lionshead Mall was reconstructed. children's programs, art shows, and more. At last count,10,345 Eagle County residents held Vail Library cards... Various elements were upgraded, pavers were replaced, new benches were added, and the area was landscaped with trees; bushes and sod. This was apublic/private ioint and that number is increasing every day. r ~ ~ , QDDOO , ATTENDANCE venture involving the Lionshead Merchants' Association, Bob Lazier, and the Town \ of Vaih P 8,0~ 1 USERS, • A New Park for West Vail. Substantial completion of Stephen's Park near Intermountain aonr~~ f ~ ~ ~ 1 ? 1992 ~ ~ ~ , 1992 ~ ~ ~ ~ in West Vail took place. The new park will offer playing fields, picnic facilities, parking R ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 1991 1992 - 141,179 areas, paths, and open space. 1991 - 98 217 " 15000 ~ - a~ a ' ~ 1991 ~I ® 179 ~ 1990 - 70,426 • Environmentally Friendly Snow Storage Facility. The TOV completed construction of a ~ ~ 1990 ? 1984 1984 - 52,292 new snow storage facility at the Town Shops. Snow removed from the streets was . ~~m 1984 previously stored east of Ford Park. Due to environmental and aesthetic concerns, a new D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ facility was mandated. ~ , MONTH JAN FE8 MAR APR MAY JUN JUE AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC • Trees for Vail. In partnership with Vail-Eagle Valley Rotary, 200 trees were planted in the E A SALUTE IS GIVEN TO THE WERTHEIM FOUNDATION South Frontage Road area between the 4-way stop and Blue Cow Chute. A similar project CD Rom Comes To The Vail Library is on tap for the coming summer. With the assistance of the Friends of the Library, the Herb and Nicole Wertheim Foundation, Merv Lapin, Susie • High Country Planting & Shrubbery Info. The Town of Vail completed an educational Bruce, and the Town of Vail, the Vail Library will be increasingaccess to information through CD-Rom technology. brochure regarding vegetation and planting procedures in the Vail Valley. Residents may Late lastyear, theHerbandNicole WertheimFoundationoffered theVailLibrarya$40,000matchinggranttoward obtain a brochure by calling Todd Oppenheimer at 479-2158. the purchase and installation of a CD-Rom system. The library will be busily raising the funds to match the Wertheims' pledge in order to make the CD-Rom dream a reality. Renovation, Repairs, and Landscapinsr to Bighorn Park. Drainage improvements and • CD-Rom is a state-of-the art system which uses a compact disc, similar to that used in a home CD audio system. berm enhancements are slated for 1993. The new technology allows file user to learn all about Ludwig van Beethoven, while simultaneously listening to ~ R one of his symphonies or to see Fred • Better Drainage. $100,000 worth of drainage work was completed in the Vail Road, East F~. ' Astaire sing and dance while studying Vail Market, Vail Valley Drive, Meadow Drive, and West Vail areas. ~ d ' • a film reviews. One CD-Rom disc can hold E ~ . ` the equivalentofall the information found • New Bus Shelters. The Town consh•ucted a new bus shelter for the Ptarmigan Townhomes ~ ; " ~Y " inwesternUnitedStatestelephonebooks area and replaced an existing shelter at Bighorn and Columbine Roads. ~~~mw " " ; ur the entire Encyclopedia BntannTCa. . ~ . A Safer Wav to Cross I-70. Improvements and repairs to the pedestrian overpass Many thanks go out to the Wertheim were completed. A ~ . • " ' gP§t family and all the continuous supporters " ~ who have helped the Vail Public Library • Better Roads. The TOV continued to plug away at its street maintenance program, sealing ~ m become one of the true gems of the Vail streets in the West Vail and Potato Patch areas. r, . : ~ Valley. • The Snow lust Keeps on Falling. TOV has hauled well over 45,000 cubic yards of snow to date during the 1992-93 winter season, one of the heaviest snow years on record, g 5 VAIL'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE TOWN OF VAIL ~ Applause for Environmentally Sensitive Under The Expertise Of A New Environmental Planner, TOV Is Moving Forward Businesses and Individuals With Steps To Protect Local Air, Water, & Land 11 Public & Private Sector Folks Join Together To Recognize Local Environmental Innovators The economic success and overall quality of our resort community rests with protectionof our natural resources. With the assistance and guidance of the Community Development Department's recently hired environmental specialist, ~ TheVailTownCouncilrecentlycreatedarecognitionprogramforthosebusinesses Russell Forrest, the Town of Vail is working to develop environmental programs and policies which will achieve that ~ and individuals displaying environmentally conscientious programs and sensitive balance and compatibility between tourism, economic prosperity, and environmental preservation. ~ practices.TheVailCommunityAwardforEnvironmentalExcellenceisintended to promote environmentally sound practices and encourage innovative The TOV's first goal is to develop an environmental strategic plan, establishing a vision for the community for environmental initiatives to protect our resort community. sustainable growth,. while protecting our air, water, and natural habitat. Part of the strategic planning process will include a public forum to identify long term environmental concerns. The strategic plan will ultimately lead to policy Throughouteachyear, theawardwillbegiventonumerousqualifyingindividuais changes, as well as implementation of environmental awareness and incentive programs. and businesses, with each receiving a certificate and media recognition. At the end of each year, a panel comprised of public and private sector representatives wiilselect the most outstanding program within the business and individual categories. The Town of Vail is currently evaluating water quality in Gore Creek and developing a plan to reduce contamination Annual winners will receive a plaque, permanent recognition within the Vail Municipal Building, and a prize such as a ski from runoff. To better protect sensitive habitat and valuable open areas, the Town will be working with the Natural pass, parking pass, or reduction on the annual business license fee. Heritage Program, a nationally recognized environmental protection organization. The Heritage Program assists in Businesses and individuals ma ualif for the award b dis ]a in innovation in the cote Dries of air ualit or natural identification of sensitive natural resources throughout the nation. habitatprotection, wastemanagement, orresourceconservation. Atyear'send, all qualifyinginitiativeswilglbecompiled into a free publication to encourage other individuals and businesses to implement similar programs. 1 Air Quality in the Vail Valley - A Burning Issue • ~ For more information regarding TOV environmental efforts, please call Russell Forrest or Susan Scanlan at the Town of Vail ~ Community Development Office, 479-2138. ` ~ Often times on a cold, winter day, a haze disappointingly looms over our valley. This is caused by air inversions which force particulates from woodburning, auto emissions, and roads to hang close to the ground. Whilenotyetaseriousenvironmentalorhealththreat,thisoccasional"brown The Employee Housing Dilemma (continued from page one) r cloud" has been an ongoing concern to residents and second homeowners alike. The Town of Vail is working to address this critical issue through a . comprehensive educational program and by creating incentives to encourage lodge and home owners to convert The Authority is targeting year-around Local employees as qualifying residents and recently hired Jim Morter of Morter Architects woodburning firep}aces to cleaner burning technologies. to design the project. Authority members met with The Learning Tree and ABC School parents and teachers earlier this year to hear their cmuerns and will continue working closely with them in designing a project which is compatible with the schools' needs. The Housing Authorit~s expectaflons are for a high quality project for which the conununity will be proud (or years to come. TheVailTownCouncil approved a fireplace ordinance in September 1991, whichallows only one EPA certified fireplace per newly constructed dwelling unit. Hand-in-hand with these ]imitations, the council called for the development and lnstriving toachieve a nurlti-faceted approach tothe comnnmity/s housing needs, the Town Councilrecentlyopproved new zoning implementation of an air quality public education program. It is hoped through increased awareness of the impact of regulations which provide incentives for developers and single t~amily homebuilders to get involved in the issue. Five different types woodburning on ourair, aconscious decision will be made by residents and guests to build fewer fires in their fireplaces. of deed restricted employee housing are being targeted for development, including rental and for-purchase properties. Through this The council's goal is to improve our air quality through primarily voluntary efforts so that further mandatory approach, the Town Council is seeking to allow increased density if the builder includes employee housing as partof the proposed restrictions are not necessary. project, TheTown ofVail and Eagle County produced and distributed over 3000 pamphietstolodgestoencouragegueststoburn lessandtouse 2~2~ cleanertechniquestyhen building fires. The Town and County are COMMUNITY SURVEY PROCESS (continued from page one) also developing a brochure for residents which discusses the economics, environmental im acts and ener> efficienc ofcleaner .;~;°~~~i~""~`~~~"'\ . In the next few weeks, the Town has embarked on an annual survey process which will combine small community focus P by y 34°b ; ~~~~`~}`x``~`"~'~ rou s a random tele hone surve and a written uestionnaire enclosed to be sent to alt residents, second homeowners, burning technologies. ,~~~,;,,,~A~,;,., 57~ g P ~ P Y~ 9 ~ ) and merchants. Feedback received throu h these avenues la s a vital role in Town Council riorities, bud etin ,decision ~~~~~~\~,"w g P Y P g g making, and staff time allocation. The Town plans to utilize focus groups on an ongoing basis to determine specific resident Through a cooperative effort between the Town of Vail, Eagle ex ectations for various TOV services. Coanty, the Public Service Company, and area vendors, P approximately 540conversions from "dirty' woodburningfireplaces to "cleaner" technologies have taken place. The Town is working Please take a few minutes to fill out the enclosed survey... and feel free to drop the Town a line any time. A new resident with Public Serviceand area vendors to develop economic incentives ? Fireplaces input tracking system assists Town staff and council members in following up on all comments and questions received.. For for homeowners and lodges to make such conversions. The goal is ®sandin9 more information regarding this year's community survey process, please call the TOV Community Relations Office at 479-21 ] 5. to achieve conversion of 2,000 woodburning units in guest .accommodations, and of these, to convert 500 units this year. ¦ venicie Exhaust 0 Grips YOI~R INPUT COUNTS... DON'T FORGET TO RETURN YOUR COMMUNITY SURVEY TO TOV BY APRIL 30! 6 ~ 14. Yonr gender Please use available snag far a,tv additional connments: ~T~ ~ 1993 VAIL COMMUNITY SURVEY 1) ~ Male TOWNOFUAIL 2) ~ Female 15. Which of these categories best describes your age? The Vail Town Council and Town of Vail staff rely heavily upon the input of residents, merchants, andse~ond home owners in establishing their budget priorities and in their daily decision making. Please take a few minutes to fill out the 1993 0) ~ 15.17 5) ~ 35-39 10) ~ 60-64 CommunilySurvey.Thefzndingsfrom#hissurveywillbecombpnedwithinformnlonobtainedthroughcommunityfocus~roups 1) Q 1£+-19 6) ~ 40-44 11) ~ 65-64 and a random telephone survey. The Town's goal is to continue the input processon a year around basis in order to facilitate 2) ~ 20-24 7) D 45-49 12) p 70 or over ongoing communication with the Vail community. Thankyou for working with us in our continuing goal of excellence. 3) ~ 25-29 8) Q 50-54 13) ~ Do not wish to reply 4} D 30-34 9) ~ 55-59 ~ For each question, please circle or check the box which corresponds with your answer. 16. Which of these categories best describes the annual 1 Your responses are confidential. No individual signature, name, or address should be written on this questionnaire. income of your household (before taxes)'? 1 Please return the completed survey to us at 75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657, no later than Apri130,1993. 1) ~ $0-6,999 S) ~ $50,0(>n-74,999 2) p $7,000-9,999 9) p $75,000-99,999 The follo,rtng questions probe certain sues related to the adequacy 3) ~ $10,000-14,999 1O) ~ $100,000-124,999 arulpeifo»nanceoftheTownofVailgm~ernment.We,t~ouldappreeiate g~ Speeding or reckless automobiles 1 2 3 4 5 4) ~ $15,000-19,999 1l) Q $125,000-149,999 yoto~responsetotheextentwhichyouareable.lfyouhnrenoopinion, h. htadequateoff-site parking 1 2 3 4 5 5) ~ $20,000-24,999 12) ~ $150,000-199,999 or no knowledge of a particulm~ subject, please indicate in the Inadequate enforcement of parking regs. 1 2 3 4 5 6) Q $25,000-34,999 13) ~ $200,000-249,999 appropriate space. j. Trash/litter, abandoned vehicles 1 ? 3 4 S 7) $35,000-49,999 14) ~ $250,000+ k, Neighborhood noise 1 ? 3 4 5 15. ~ Do not wish to reply 1. How infomted do you consider yourself about local I. Animals (running at large, barking) 1 2 3 4 5 govenumental issues and operations of the Town of Vail? m. Sibs (street names, traffic controls) 1 2 3 4 5 17. What is your occupation? 1) ~ Very well informed n. Pollution from woodsmoke 1 2 3 4 5 o. Pollution from road dust 1 3 4 5 2) ~ Moderately informed p. back of recreational facilities (bike paths, 3) ~ Slightly informed parks, playgrounds) 1 2 3 4 5 4) ~ Not at all informed q. Other 1 2 3 4 5 Please fold along this line, staple, and drop off or mail to the Town of Vail by April 30, 1993. 5) p Uncertain Using the same scale, with 1 being "Poor," 5 being "Excellent," 2. , Do you wish to be more informed than you are currently'? and 0 being "Don't Know," how would you rate the overall 1) ~ Yes performance of the following services provided by the Town of ~ 75 SOUth F'i'oltt(tg~ Road 2) ~ No Vail'? Rate the Duality of each service and, where appropriate, use the scale of 1-S to rate the levellfreauenev of service. in other Vail, Colorado 81657 T~~ ~F VA~L 'y 3. What are the most common means yon utilize to keep informed words, indicate how well TOV performs a given service, as well about local issues? (Cheek all which apply.) as whether or not the service is provided enough to meet your " expectations. 1) Q The Vail Trail P~ XiP AVG E~~. ATtn/ Fem. 2) ~ Vail Daily General Services; 3) 0 Vail Valley Times (fonnerlyAyon-Beaver Creek Tin,esl E.mrnple: Cleaning of public restrooms 1 3 3 4 5 0 4) Q Local cable television 5) ~ Loco] radio a. Snow removal/sanding of streets 1 2 3 4 5 0 _ 6) ~ Attendance at public Town meetings and hearings b. Snow removal/sanding ofsidewalks/ 7) Q Word of mouthJfriends stairways 1 2 3 4 5 0 8) ~ h,dividual contact with local officials and/or staff c. Street repair & maintenance 1 2 3 4 S 0 _ TOWIIOfVail 9)~ None d. Street sweeping 12 3 4 5 0_ 7S South FTOntage ROad 10)D Other (specify) e. Street lighting 1 2 3 4 5 0_ £ Maintenance of park areas 1 ? 3 4 5 0- Vfll~, CO~OCi1d0 81657 ~ 1. Sales tax & business license services 1 3 3 4 5 0_ 4. Which of the above is the MO5T effective source'. (INSERT # FROMLIST) n,. Finance cashier window 1 2 3 4 5 0_ ATTN: Vail Community Survey n. Municipal Court services 1 2 3 4 5 0- 5. To what degree are the following conditions a problem in your Bus System; neighborhood? Use a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being "No Problem" a. In-town shuttle 1 2 3 4 5 0 _ and 5 being a "Major Problem." b. Sandstone route 1 ? 3 4 5 0 _ ~„~FN e. East Vail route 1? 3 4 5 0_ a. Snow removal from roads 1 3 3 4 5 d. West Vail route 1? 3 4 5 0 b. Snow removal from walkways 1 3 3 4 5 e. Bus service bouts of operation 1 2 3 4 5 0 c. Street disrepair (potholes, cracks, etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 f. Bus service frequency 1 2 3 4 5 0 d. Unsafe walking routes 1 3 3 4 5 g, Bus driver courtesy 1 2 3 4 5 0 e. hnadequate street lighting 1 3 3 4 5 h. Bus cleanliness 1 2 3 4 5 0 f. Crime, sense of security 1 2 3 4 5 i, parking structure cleanliness 1 2 3 4 5 0 j. Booth attendaut/host courtesy ] 2 3 4 5 0 4 1 Communit Develo meat; 9. Rate the followin riorities in order of im ortance to ou with Tlae assn e o Amendment 1 in Colorado laces s endin limits on 3. How Ion have ou lived at our current address or owned our Y P Pam g P p Y p 8 f P P ~ g Y Y ~ Y a. Hi>urs of operation 1 2 3 4 S 0 1 being most important and 4 being least important. All projects the Town of Vail and other gover•mnental bodies. Please answer the property, if anon-resident}'? b. Responsiveness to telephone inquiries 1 3 3 4 5 0 would be funded out of the Real Estate Transfer Tax fund. Due following questions regarding this measure. 1) Q Less than 1 year c. Development review assistance 2 3 4 5 0 - to limited dollars, however, it is important for the Town to know ~ ~ Q 1-_ years d. Zoning enforcement 1 2 3 4 5 0 - which of these projects are most important to you. L. Which of the following aspects of Amendment 1 are most 3) Q 3-4 years e. Building pemtit plan review 1 2 3 4 5 0 - desirable/important to you as they relate to the Town of Vail? 4) Q 5-7 years f. Building inspections 1 2 3 4 5 0 - Additional open space purchase for habitat protection (Check afl which apply.) 5) Q 8-10 years g. Sigtt wde enforcement 1 2 3 4 5 0 _ Park Development 1) D Voters must approve al] tax increases 6) Q 11-14 years h. Restaurant inspections 1 3 3 4 5 0 - Pocket/neighborhood park development Q Voters must approve any new municipal debt (even if a tax 7) Q More than 15 years i. Art in Public Places program 1 2 3 4 5 0 - Large, centralized park (i.e., Ford Park) increase is not necessary) j. Envirormtental pluming programs 1 ? 3 4 5 0 - development 3) Q Town of Vail revenue growth above the Denver inflation 4. How long have you lived within the town of Vail (or owned Bike/pedestrian path development rate lus the rcenta e of owth in ro ert values due to xo ett if anon-resident ? Librar ; > p ~ g ~ p p Y 1 p Y ) Y new construction, must be approved annually by voters a. General services 1 2 3 4 5 0 1) Q Less that 1 year - 10. Thinking about the significant issues facing the Town of Vail 4) Q Elections may only be held in November ~ ~ b. Access to library (i.e., bus system, ) Q 1-.,years over the next several yeas, please rate the following in terms of S) Q None of the above parking structure) 1 2 3 4 5 0 3) Q 3-4 years their importance to the overall contmm~ity and their need for 6) Q Need more information 4 Q 5-7 ears c. Hours of operation 1 2 3 4 5 0 } Y attention from the Towu. Local government faces limited S) Q 8-10 years funds and must establish which goals are most important in the 13. Would you consider voting in favor of a local modification to 6) Q 11-14 years Fne; ' community's view. Amendment 1 to establish a different set of spending ~ More than 15 ears a. Fire code enforcement 1 3 4 5 0 limitations which would better match Vail's eamomy (if such ) Q Y b. Fire response time 1 3 3 4 5 0 ""r ~ a. Acquisition of open space for ~~T~ an alternative were placed ou the ballot)'? 5. Do ou own or rent our ro rt c. Fire protection 1 3 4 5 0 Y Y P Pe Y• recreational activities 1 2 3 4 5 0 d. Emergency medical services 1 3 4 5 0 1) Q Yes 1 Q Owtt b. Acquisition of open space to preserve ) 2) ~ No 2 Q Rent environmentally sensitive areas 1 2 3 4 5 0 ) Police; 3) Q Need more itformation 3) Q Other (specify) c. Provision of affordable housing opportunities a. Neighborhood police service 1 3 3 4 5 0- within the Town of Vail limits 1 2 3 4 5 0 b. Business area lice service 1 3 4 5 0 - If you answered yes or no, please explain your reasoning: po d. Growthldensity controls 1 2 3 4 5 0 6. Which of these categories best describes your marital status? c. Traffic control (4-way stop traffic direction) 1 3 4 5 0 - e. Traffic congestiouremedies -Main Vail 1 2 3 4 5 0 d. Traffic enforcement (speeding vehicles, ~ 1) Q Single f. Traffic congestion remedies -West Vail 1 3 4 5 0 ~ parking violations) 1 2 3 4 5 0- g Economic development/job creation 1 2 3 4 5 0 ) Q Single with children e. Attitude and demeanor of Vail Police 3) Q Single, children no longer at home h. Air quality protection 1? 3 4 5 0 employees with whom I have had contact 1 3 3 4 5 0 4) D Couple, no children i. Water quality protection 1 3 4 5 0 Thrlnk you for your time and effort in answering these gaestions. C Feeling of security within TOV limits 1 _ 3 4 S 0 5) Q Couple with children ~ j. Expansion of tourism opportunities) Please prot~i~de the following demographic information. Feel free g. Overall performutce of Vail Police Dept. 1 3 4 5 0 facilities insummer/fall 1 3 3 4 5 0 6) Q Couple, children no longer at home to leave any questions you are not canrfortable answering blank, or k. Expansion of tourism opportunities/ simply cheek 'DO NOT WISH TO REPLY." Again, snrt eye x ill h. To what extent do you agree with the following statement: facilities in winter 1 3 4 S 0 7. (IF YOU HAVF, CHILDREN) How tttany are in the "Private citizens can and should help the police department." ~ remain anonymous. Please do not write your mm~e or address on followin a e routs? 1. Expansion of year around cultural g g g l A~^T n'om' this survey, (i.e,communitywatchprogram) ^ti ro ams/facilities 1? 3 4 5 0 1 3 3 4 5 0 p g 1) Q O-5 years m. Expanded "regional" govenmtental authority 1. Where is your property within the town of Vail located'' 2) Q 6-12 years ^r to address problems of the entire Vail 3) Q 13-18 years i. Do you feel high police visibility ~ 1 East Vail Valley, including areas down-valley 1 3 4 5 0 ) Q controls/reduces the crime rate? 1 ? 3 4 5 0 2 Booth Falls and Bald Mountain Road areas n. Prohibition of smoking in public places ) Q 8. hcluding yourself, how many persons reside in your household? 7. How would ou rate the overall rfonuauce of the following (i.e., restaurants, stores) 1 2 3 4 5 0 3) Q Golf Course administrative/management furcl ins of the Town government? Other 1 ? 3 4 S 0 4) Q Vail Village tt~ 5) Q Lionshead 9. How many persons residing in your household are adults over F°'~ F.~~ 6} Q Potato Patch Sandstone a. General administration 1 3 3 4 ,4 0 the age of 18'? 11. Of the issues rued in the previous question (#10), please 7) ~ Buffctu Creek, Lions Ridge, the Valley h. Rcsponsivencss to public input?mncerns 1 3 3 4 5 0 , indicate by letter your top five priorities for Town of ~ ail focus. 8) Q West Vait (north of.I-70) 10. How many bedrooms are in your housing unit? . c. h~fonnatiou dissemination 1 3 3 4 5 0 9) Q Matterhorn, Glen Lyon d. Overall financial management 1 3 3 4 5 0 ~ 1 L How man cars are owned and ke t at your home or lace of 1st Priority ..rid Priority 3rd Priority 4th Priority 5th Priority 10) Q hrtcrmountain Y p ) P e. Overall employee attitudes/friendliness 1 3 3 4 5 0 11) Q Not aresident/property owner/busiuess owner of the noun business in Vail`? 8. How would you rate the overall performance of the following of Vul 1?. How many cars do you own? conunissions utd elected/appointed officials? 1?, What informatimt is most important to you iti evaluating Which of the following categories best describes your 13. What is your primary method of transportation in the Vail area? ~ residen status? ~ the need for a performance and conference center in Vail. cY ' ' a. Mayor 1 3 4 5 0 1) Q Private car/vehicle 5)QHitchhike b. Town Comtcil 1 ? 3 4 5 0 1) Q Year-wound Vail resident Q Outlying bus service h) Q Walk c. Planning ~ Envirou. Comnrission (PEC) 1 3 3 4 5 0 Q Seasonal Vail resident 3) Q Lt-town shuttle 7) Q Cupa~l d. Design Review Board (DRB) 1 ~ 3 4 5 0 3) Q Owner of vacation property in Vail 4) Q Bicycle 8) Q Other (specify) e. Housing Authority 1 3 3 4 5 0 4) Q Non-resident, owner of business or commercial property f. Local Licensing Authority (Liquor) 1 ? 3 4 5 0 in Vail g. Municipal Court Judge 1 3 3 4 5 0 5} Q Other g. Vail Valley Marketing Board 1 3 3 4 5 0 COMMENTS: 2 3 "Art does not reproduce what we see. ~t makes us see. " Paul Klee The following sponsorships are available for the Town of Vail Art in Public Places project in the Vail Transportation Center: Benefactor -Sponsorship at this level of eivin¢ has been completed. $1000 sponsorship of one of 7 individually cast glass blocks located at the entriesof the strudure.Benefadors will receive a "piece of the wall," a small polished glass block signed by the artist, a signed, bound copy of "Dan Dailey: Simple Complexities in Drawings and Glass,1972-1987", with an 8" x 11" irdivid ual drawing, and individual recognition at the artwork location for their support. Supporter $500 sponsorship of one of 80 blocks in the cast glass mural. Supporters will receive "a piece of the wall", a small polished glass block signed by the artist, and individual recognition at the location of the artwork fortheir support. Sponsorship of two blocks for $1000 entitles you to those benefits described under the Benefactor category. Contributor $100 sponsorship of the project. Contributors will receive recognition. NAIv1F - ADDRE~~ - CITY STATE _ ZIP . The Vail Art in Public Placrs Vail Transportation Center Project will Tz dedicated in 1993. Your support of the project is greatly appreciated. All contributions to this program are tax deductible. PIease foruxrrd your contribution to: Town of Vnil Art in Public Placrs VTC Project 75 South Frontage Road IM YVBLIC Vail, CO 81657 n~Aees TOWN OF YAtL iROGRAY '<`5~ r4r- l TOWN OFUAIL TELEPHONE CONNECTION VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor 476-0503 All Information 479-2138 Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro Tem 476-5483 Bob Buckley 476-5601 MUNICIPAL COURT Jim Gibson 476-0742 Municipal Judge 479-2131 Rob LeVine 476-2471 Municipal Court Administrator 479-2129 Jim Shearer 476-2421 Tom Steinberg 476-5427 FIRE DEPARTMENT_ Fire Chief 479-2252 ADMINISTRATION/TOWN MANAGER Fire Marshal 479-2135 Town Mana er 479-2105 Vail Village Fire Station 479-2250 g Town Attorney 479-2107 East Vail Fire Station 479-2257 Secretary to Town Manager/Town Attorney 479-2106 PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL Public Works Director 479-2158 Receptionist/General Information 479-2100 Snow Plowing Information 479-2158 Job Line 479-2343 Street Cut Permit Information 479-2158 Parking Superintendent 479-2178 COMMUNITY RELATIONS Bus System Office 479-2358 Assistant to Town Manager 479-2113 24 Hour Bus Schedule Information 328-8143 Town Clerk 479-2136 Paratransit Bus Service................................... 479-2174 Public Relations Manager 479-2115 Engineer 479-2160 Village Parking Booth (winter) 479-2177 FINANCE Lionshead Parking Booth (Winter) 479-2180 All Information 479-2120 VAIL PUBLIC LIBRARY OTHER GENERAL INFORMATION All Information 479-2183 Avon Beaver Creek Transit 949-6121 Colorado Driver's License Bureau 827-5252 POLICE DEPARTMENT Colorado Ski Museum 476-1876 Police Chief 479-2210 Eagle County Animal Shelter........................... 949-4292 Police Non-Emergency 479-2200 Eagle County Offices 328-8600 Emergency 911 Eagle County School District 328-6321 Animal Control (Eagle County} 949-4328 Holy Cross Electric 949-5892 Code Enforcement 479-2200 State-wide Road Conditions 328-6345 Community Relations 479-2213 US Post Office 476-5217 Road Conditions 479-2226 Upper Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District 476-7480 Vail Associates 476-5601 FAX MACHINES Vail Interfaith Chapel 476-3347 Municipal Building Fax 479-2157 Vail Mountain Medical (clinic) 476-5695 Public Works Fax 479-2166 Vail Recreation District 479-2448 Library Fax 479-2192 Vail Valley Foundation..................................... 476-9500 Community Development Fax 479-2452 Vail Valley Medical Center (hospital) 476-2451 Transportation Center Fax 479-2453 Vail Valley Tourism & Convention Bureau 476-1000 Women's Resource Center 476-7384 SERVICES FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED T D D (for hearing impaired) 479-2356 24 Hour Paratransit Service 479-2174 ~ r„~ . Kristen Blume P.O. Box 4122 Vail, Colorado 81658 March 30, 1993 Andrew Knudtsen Community Development Department 111 South Frontage Road West Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Mr. Knudtsen, As you know, on March 22, 1993 the Vail Planning Commission granted a conditional use permit to Mr. Larry Grace for the addition of an employee housing unit to his duplex to be constructed on Lot 41 in the Glen Lyon Subdivision. As a partner in the Blume Family Partnership, I am formally appealing the decision of the Planning Commission on behalf of the Blume Family Partnership and the Sue Ackerman Trust, the collective owners of Lot 40 in Glen Lyon. While we are keenly aware of the need for employee housing in the Vail Valley, we do not feel that Glen Lyon is the appropriate neighborhood to begin experimenting with the addition of a third housing unit to a primary/secondary dwelling. The traffic flow in Glen Lyon was very poorly planned. There i.s only one road allowing ingress and egress into the community. This road does not even meet Town of Vail standards due to a very sharp curve and an undersized bridge. Traffic problems already exist and there are still dozens of lots awaiting development in Glen Lyon. We do not believe it would be possible to deny future developers the right to add an employee housing unit if Mr. Grace i.s granted permission now. Glen Lyon could not absorb the increased density and traffic. We are also concerned about the complexity of attempting to enforce the conditional use. If employee housing units become a standard addition, it will be impossible to police all the units. Even if a violation is discovered, there is no appropriate penalty. Once constructed, a third housing unit could never be removed from a primary/secondary unit, and short-term rentals are far too profitable for a fine to have much affect. The potential for abuse wilt always exist. For these reasons the homeowners in the Glen Lyon community want the Town Council to review the decision of the Planning Commission. I therefore am filing this formal appeal Sincerely, Kristen Blume cc: Larry Grace MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: March 22, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for a conditional use permit to allow for an "employee housing unit" on Lot 41, Glen Lyon Subdivision/1212 Westhaven Lane. Applicant: Larry Grace Planner: Andy Knudtsen . :,M.:.K......x.,nv. ..,K,,::...v. „~.:......K,..:,.:.r . Ica.:...:...::::::.,,,.:...~,..::::::::::.:::.......z •:,,:::•:..:.,~:::.a,.. ..s......... r... x:... i ~.v:.+.:^.v: fw::: r.:.~.. n..... xr..r::: •.v.:: ~,y...t Ly: ?Y •.J n.~-s••:.'li.'vl}. .n?.v: :~.r :9.v~r •.4 t~ n.r...........w:.w:r:-iii:Civx:: nom::. rn r.:: v ~ "r ~C:t~3 •.v}r{.;r;;w~,, .r 4.{v n.. ...}'{...vii. ~v....., .?..J v. ......v ..................::x:::::nw:::;:.:::........:n:w::::::n~::. r:. vf:•. •::.iv: n,.;; n~... ~$.vx:r:.v vvh..ii. +Y'}.•. v:; r. ~•}':?v:: v.\.;. ti:.v .......:.4::v.:v:::-t:.:::n:::r::n:u:::::.~.:.::w::::: x: vr.. r.•r:::: ~~:4:'•::::: w:.•: wn. :vxv••.. ..n. ...nnv.nfi v,•...4 .........................ann......-....., .v.n m.: :'..::.::::..J.. ^:::ii"r nv i;.:::f,.};} 3in•{ ~l~~+~~i hF.•}`.`itl:':.v.~~ i •v: { ..........w.~:::: •::•::v:::::•::.,: nw::: niiii^n..... •...:..:n:::; n;•.: v: v.n}vr •.4.its rv~v::: v; \v;, ~ v,..: J:':: i:::::::::v::'.iti•:': r'viih~:{<i{-:.fin; ~}..,..;:.:v'.;iwn::i:':i':itiiiiiii: 4ti:;:. w.~:.- .....n ..::~v~.r.., v:.: 'FfA 4n+sAf~HrfArn .rr.::rx:rv.•.~:..•••. vv~! ::.2wh{vF}MrA}}h•:/N.Wn.~rnxviV.v~..i...:....:..xxrxNMM'+Wx2rfMGACiGh4rGGi~ I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE In September and December of 1992, the Town Council passed Ordinances 9 and 27, Series of 1992, to create a new Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing, for the addition of Employee Housing Units (EHUs) as permitted or conditional uses within certain zone districts within the Town of Vail. The definition in that ordinance states: Section 18.04.105 "Employee Housing Unit (EHU) shall mean a dwelling unit which shall not be leased or rented for any period less than thirty (30) consecutive days, and shall be rented only to tenants who are full-time employees of Eagle County. EHUs shall be allowed in certain zone districts as set forth in Chapter 18 of this Code. Development standards for EHUs shall be as provided in Chapter 18.57 - Employee Housing. For the purposes of this Section, afull-time employee shall mean a person who works a minimum of an~average~of thirty (30) hours per week. There shall be five (5) categories of EHUs: Type I, Type II, Type III, Type IV, and Type V. Provisions relating to each type of EHU are set forth in Chapter 18.57 -Employee Housing of this Code." In this proposal, the applicant is planning to construct aPrimary/Secondary development on a lot that is currently vacant. In between the primary and secondary dwelling units, he is proposing to construct a Type II Employee Housing Unit. This unit is 538 square feet. It is located immediately above a one car garage which has been set aside for this unit. The applicant intends to use two "250's" in the construction of the EHU two. These "250's" would be available for the applicant five years from the date of a certificate of occupancy for the primary. and secondary dwelling units. However, in an effort to encourage these types of housing units, the Town has made the "250's" available up front to developers as long as they are used in employee housing units. In this case, since the EHU is 538 square feet, both of the "250's" will be used in the construction of it. . i II. ZONING ANALYSIS Allowed/Required Proposed Height 33 feet 33 feet GRFA 7,307 sq. ft. 7,300 sq. ft. Site Coverage 9,138.8 sq. ft. 6,804.5 sq. ft. Landscaping 27,416 sq. ft. 27,634 sq. ft. Parking 6 9 Setbacks: Front 20' 68' Side 15' 17' Side 15' 17' Rear 15' 28' Please note that this zoning analysis may be slightly modified prior to final DRB approval. However, staff will insure that all zoning standards will be met. III. CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Upon review of Section 18.60 -Conditional Use Permits, the Community Development Department recommends approval of the conditional use permit based upon the following factors: A. Consideration of Factors: _ Before acting on a conditional use permit application, the Planning and Environmental Commission shall consider the factors with respect to the proposed use: 1. _ Relationship and impact of the use on the development objectives of the t' ° Town. _ When the Town Council adopted the Town of Vail Affordable Housing study on November 20, 1990, it recognized the need to increase the supply of housing. The Town encourages EHUs as a means of - ~ rovidin uali liven conditions and ex andin the su I of em to ee p 9q tY~~9 A 9 PpY P Y housing for both year-round and seasonal local residents. The d proposed unit will have a positive impact on the Town's housing needs. x _ ~ _ 2. The effect of the use on liaht and air, distribution of population. -transportation facilities. utilities. schools. parks and recreation facilities, ` r and other public facilities needs:` ~ 2 f - - _ • Staff believes that there will be little impact from the proposed Type II EHU on light, air, population, transportation, utilities, schools or parks. ~ _ ~ 3. . ~ Effect upon traffic with particular reference to congestion, automotive a _ - ~ and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, access, maneuverability, and removal of snow from the street and parking areas. It is likely that there would be one additional vehicle driving to the residence. Staff feels that this would be an insignificant impact upon traffic. 4. _ Effect upon the character of the area in which the proposed use is to be • located, including the scale and bulk of the proposed use in relation to - surrounding uses. The scale and bulk of the proposed structure is larger than those that are or will be built around it. This is due to the fact that the lot on which • it will be built is slightly more than an acre in size. As a result, the available GRFA for the site is larger than the surrounding lots. Staff believes that the applicant's desire to construct a Type II EHU is a good use of the square footage available to this site. Staff believes that in five years, the proposed square footage may otherwise be incorporated - into the primary or secondary units. The amount of GRFA in this proposal is not greater than what ultimately could be constructed. 5. ~ - -Employee Housing Units may be allowed as a conditional use in those zone districts as specified by Title 18 of the Vail Municipal Code for Ordinance No. 27. Series of 1992. Employee Housing and. shall be • subiect to the following conditions: T ~ a. It shall be a conditional use in the Single-Family Residential, • ~ - Two-Family Residential and Primary/Secondary Residential zone - _ districts. - - The subject property is zoned SDD with Primary/Secondary _ y • Residential as the underlying zoning. - b. It shall be permitted only on lots which comply with minimum lot size requirements of the zone district in which the lot is located. The minimum lot size for a Type II EHU in this zone district is - 15,000 square feet. The applicant's property is 45,694 square feet. c. It shall be located within. or attached to. asingle-family dwelling ~ { or be located within, or attached to, atwo-family dwelling pursuant to Section 18.54.050(11 -Design Guidelines Duplex and 3 - Primary/Secondary Development. It may also be located in, or ~ attached to, an existing aaraae provided the aaraae is not located within any setback, and further provided that no existing parking required by the Town of Vail Municipal Code is reduced j _ ~ _ or eliminated. ? ~ The proposed EHU will be constructed between the primary and secondary units on this site. d. It shall not be counted as a dwellina unit for the purposes of calculating density. However. it shall contain kitchen facilities - and a bathroom. as defined in Chapter 18.04 -Definitions of the _ Municipal Code. It shall be permitted to be a third dwellina unit in addition to the two dwellina units which may already exist on the lot. Only one Tvpe II EHU shall be allowed per lot. The proposed EHU will be a third dwelling unit on this site. It ,4i contains a full kitchen and full bathroom facilities. _ e. It shall have a GRFA not less than three hundred (3001 square feet. nor more than nine hundred (9001 square feet. An applicant, however. shall be permitted to apply to the Community - Development Department of the Town of Vail for additional GRFA not to exceed five hundred (5001 square feet to be used in the construction of the EHU. The applicant shall submit an application for the additional GRFA on a form provided by the _ Community Development Department. Approval or denial of the ' request shall be made by the Design Review Board in _ . accordance with Section 18.54.040. If an applicant obtains Desian Review Board approval for 500 square feet of additional GRFA for the EHU. he or she shall not be entitled to receive additional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross _ Residential Floor Area of this Code for either unit on the lot. If "m, an applicant obtains Design Review Board approval for not more than 250 square feet of additional GRFA for the EHU, he or she ~c'~== ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ shall be entitled to receive additional GRFA pursuant to Chapter 18.71 -Additional Gross Residential Floor Area of this code for - one dwellina unit on the lot. . , , ~ " ~ The. applicant has applied for an additional 500 square feet of GRFA to be used for the construction of the EHU. This 500 - ~ ~ square feet is the allocation of additional GRFA that would have - otherwise been available to the applicant in five years. The EHU is 538 square feet. The criteria stated above requires the DRB to approve the use of the "250's" in this manner. Since there is . _ _ _ also a requirement for the PEC to approve a conditional use, m_ s_'staff is recommending that the conditional use be contingent . upon DRB approval. 4 f. It shall have no more than two bedrooms. The proposed EHU will have one bedroom. - g. No more than two (21 adults and one (11 child not older than _ sixteen (16) vears of aae shall reside in a one (11 bedroom Tvpe II EHU. No more than two (21 adults and two (21 children not - - V older than sixteen (161 vears of aae shall reside in a two (21 . bedroom Tvpe II EHU. Since this is a proposed one (1 }bedroom Type 11 EHU, the above regulations will need to be applied. h. Each Tvpe II EHU shall be required to have no less than one (11 - parking space for each bedroom located therein. However, if a one (1) bedroom Tvoe II EHU exceeds six hundred (600) square feet. it shall have two (21 parking spaces. All parking spaces required by this Code shall be located on the same lot or site as the EHU. If no dwelling exists upon the property which is oronosed for a Tvne II EHU at the time a building permit is issued, or if an existing dweHina is to be demolished and replaced by a new dwelling, not less than one (1) of the parking spaces required by this paragraph shall be enclosed. A 300 square feet GRFA credit shall be allowed for the construction of one enclosed oarkina space for the Tvpe II EHU. Since this site is currently vacant and this is new construction, - the requirement for a one space garage for the EHU is required and will be fulfilled. e B. Findings: The Planning and Environmental Commission shall make the following findings before granting a conditional use permit for an Employee Housing Unit: - 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the purposes of this Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use would comply with each of the applicable r provisions of Title 18 of the Vail Municipal Code. . 5 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of this application for an Employee Housing Unit. Staff believes that the criteria have been met as discussed in the memo. Regarding the findings, staff believes that finding B1 is met as the proposed use is in accordance with the purposes of the zoning ordinance as well as the zone district. Finding B2 is met, in staff's opinion, as the proposed use is not detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. Finding 63, in staff's opinion, as the proposal complies with all of the standards of the zoning code. Staff recommends approval of the request with two conditions: 1) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed Primary/Secondary - - Employee Housing Unit Type II Development, the applicant shall sign deed restrictions using forms provided by the Town of Vail to be recorded at the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office which will set forth that the employee housing unit is to be permanently restricted for employee housing. 2) This conditional use permit shall become effective only after the Design Review Board has approved the development and approved the use of the "250's" for the Type II EHU. Please note that under Section 18.60.080 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code, the approval of a conditional use permit shall lapse and become void if a building permit is not obtained and construction not commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or the use for which the approval has been granted has not commenced within two years from when the approval becomes final. , c:~pec~nemos~prece f, is _ . k. f 6 y %erre, Ss~er?er~ ~r L.~ ~ IrslKr p(w~ctT)us Sp~e? _ _ _ _ _ Arsbil«u. = .fit 1 _1~ uMl.4N/ CnW~~__/...- 1. _ ~.~--~i._ ` w....~~~ ...L ~ ~_3i~~' i ~V ""~~~~tti ~ ~ r prra.. - 1 d _ a-r+sc c~ osrt ~ ~ (rye ~ _ : c7 , ~syfl~ N?rk.Y tl I - P 1 µ.O.MJ ~ ~ 71' M/~~/ a ` ~N~iolLr Mfrsl~~o+`L a~.~O+i]_{l ~`.s FY \~'i}- MY .l t.. I 'rte"-•' ~ \ W - ' _ \ a ~ TAN ~•i ~ > .x.. . . ~ a • ~ . 4 .'I'vy ii ~ 04y' ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 \ t pM): _ T _ V na _ _ Nyra r. 1 ~{pN - ~ ~ -rte== ~ SITE PLAN j~::...,: - 1'NORiN~ s.. a ~ ~ - - Al • ~ Pkra, v ^ Sgerber~A 5p~eA Arehitsdr u ~ ~ rur.irc . rrr:.r.r~.r... w c.r....«r Po orc~ ~ ...,.....r.. NIW 4µ.r ~ r~.r..u •v••e....... .;'e•...:: ..vim..... ~ ~~irw '{j~~~ yDp • µcw.ar.~o w o A~ . , Ca O J' ~ r~r~' ~ `tJU+ 4 . ~ - ~ V L~ _ ,f J.SI"tN Tc~'{h ~,r S NrN+LT as o.r,. V. ' ~j 4drairt ~-b~p • e,„,D I'. sso I eoY~vs~c 1n.r~+uuly uw. ..t,., ~.i' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ow.~ vsana ' - nNw r:~1i0N, - ...m . 1~• A: .,LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ b: f A. L1 „ ~ .:rV', ~ ~;Mu,., , : w sw,5.~..'~.a;.a..F.a,•nre~:;%e.' • { 1 i s ~ M rw www• - t 1 LdT 45 - I ~ • • ~ ! 1-`` - 4 - ~ r~ I • lOT 42 ~ ~ ~ ~4 i i soo•K'•s'w +10.37 rr•~...w.r.. ! , . I V ...........,.«~..w~. ' 1 ~ w,,a• r. r• . B.L.N. ~ w m.r tors w w a.nt 1w • w i ..m~r..~.. w~ ~riir i : rn 1'• ~ ~.uu mn. • n.~ w ~ t EXlIGT lAT M AMIIiED R.NT (tF!! LWN RJBDIVISION ti ~ - ' =""t ~.w.r~ ter.. ~ Y~....~w « r ~ ~ 70'M~ OF VY.. EKL[ 006NIY. OOI~RAC: ` n ~.u .r.w ...w r .r r-.. K.- 1«...aawv w ~ rr~ w.~.... ~ ' s: x`.~ . - . ~ ~ ~ r~.awlwa.l.'~ww.'wwRaMwmawS•Nmrk~.kr.+. T.d.Gw aru++u»aawn........, i.»rxs~d~Sa+~.GaY~.w 'd#weri w. ..i.r+.- .1 :,~r't~R!^:le•t.. Y,-t-n'va:....s+•e--?'; -.r. i...:~... .:M;:c;G: '~t!! y"?r,.v;s:"i~,:x. rx^!:^^• :TR:7 :'!'^.nx~•:n. Na..... I ww wgecr mob.'-„ •w-'lq.igMY-wi~ W onfo~ ^.Yn W~ =.,Ywn t9un W Mtllnq. ~iq~ Y j. ' 'F prt= nw w q.rq.w w..q~ p sva•r. M- mm.~i.1o,+ . wM .uu~ Ww.u..q wi i ~ p /yc~~ G LtYFAO I - 1 6 , .w^wws tY1l M w m wv,•' es nwlw q ww 9 ~1 n'rrwgq•o.rr \1 wrr --i w r.ww.. ww.r w r r w...nq w.m. - 2 CD ISM . R ' ~wq W wwnA twYt wligw wlw w nASYa W 6 ~ N n.nrr I.~i ut - y x ~nr ~ mr nw.Y nrou~wrwa • R ~ s wW w a nr ! rnew. Ior.e.w w w ~ .Hier MIw~wYallrw0'I wwme .wlq. J 1~{1 -'-.aqM WWY/iF Ha~~ ~.ar ~n R I~V••~ngW .wY wW -w'HV.n. w W~ wrrt w:rar wtn. ' ~ w. ~~t~ar II wow ~ wrv mnw 1 - ~ YU ~ ,1 n _ _ _ f ':..a;ei ~r~+:~i!s r. ~~r,4Wr iY~ 'R n"wr°~.~~~?. ti an. ~ 1 -k a ~ t ! a • `nrr~rw ~ ~ mR.` ~ _ ~wl~.~wMr-_- - ~ ~~Q~ , w^'r • ?^.~`r i~J . ~sa ~ r?arn~ (1 9 to u~ ~.aav __t • . ~ rt.. . a~.:: 'y ¢ET•x r.~a.nq g . ~ . l . ,y~..Y6.•e 1? .'i s+..e fil~., .j . ~GL' : is ~/1 ~."ST. •it~•: ..rt!lt[:Y..j;:•>•~•q:` ;,~x';. - '•i a F, • ~ tf f~ 1 ,s..-.a I1 • yw,.. t~ 1.._ ,1~9ti~,;Y1ei . 6~t j ~ ~ ` Qi ,v. J .:unr~..+,w'1°.'q..'•: f:-r~l fit`..: ~Ffri. ~t•Y:. :-L .:5-.- • i:' f .1. ,h _tvi;^' ;,~r3C•J:>7 ~ '•-i.it ;)jti:~it•9'.; .+::',i•'...~_ a.~*;r .~ti:'•' ~ . -61 i% 1( ..yaK~.. h~.~y; d a... i.r tiff, . jh%' ::;a•:,;t; ..q i•.l .'•:.,3 .:5: • } ~~/s ~ w a w .'sue v: •r, t i } 1gj~t ! E4 ~ 3 I .J '~?I S A - 2 1 l j $ 4 c .t Y t .c ....J.. _ii Y~_ 4 d p . _ 1 WESTHAVEN : 4 ANE x _`_s. :..t_ _~~L"=~ ~.3 1 -J- _ _ ..:J r... ..r....., - r. • ; ~ 4 _ ~c _ . i # t ~ E s. , t 1 ' J. _ _ 1...:. C , 1 ~ I`. - y, a n. . . i.. .....1 • ...t • _ _ _ t 1 4•'. 1 ' f. ' . _wf_ - - r . f ' . . .i. x 6r d ; NM AN ..M . AY I.N W I .,•...•slil z•: i:Y .'ii ~.'vtc:i: 'i;. %r 1,lpf>.:~ 'w'~ t1t .-Ia '4i dt ~ t... 1. ~ ~ Plera, Ss~er6a~ t $5ppuA Arehllsetr, i iuw~uc r.tuwu ~ ~.a.. L , j~ ~ 1 _ l~ • . _ - - x O 7 o ~ ~ a ° ~ CL a • • a .'v+• rro ~ ~ _ ; r w.: vsvr~ tt.-s~ .y..«,u> ~ ~LOr• Via... M: ,:may • ~cyy.. . c..~w w: ~ _ ~ _ a.. a 1 _ 1 y , _ • x. ..-y n. r;.:;+~. r.:.. ,gar, e.<. ~ ,in.... .i ...,.,w..,rsa4..3r6;s1CrA#rCA~{534'6x..~.i... M axe.. ,[dS +n~ ,>i~.l.~s, W~.,4,KarJ•w.c, . ~ Pierce, ' &{erber~ t ' M~~~ /.C.•AJ.M ~t ' ~ iulc+uc F~rrlMr IYYi ti ti ' I.Y wYII rrOr.[w,Y ' • IIYMM le k~~~ ' IM.O.w.1.~W ' ~ ~ r~.c+,r of W/NMW Q. x • _ Q o _ _ 1 W v ~ > MWar[-- ~ . ' ..~J ' r' ,G` / N i/l//~~ LLV L . ~ ll • ~ + i ~ ~ ~,YCy. IwIL' . Ny,p r: JON f. uIJ17 1-1 O KrH ~,t..K.Vi~TloaJ i i.r a: IJ i : ~ ri • s5 v X r. `54.:~~ M ~ • . •...yMdi C,Swa'MI'L•'.!'4 •e•~..VatpN 4J\VNv IW... }.aA Ntr q.4W.. s... ~r»nu~.... e. ru.. ~i ~ Plsra, • St srpber~! Artb14N ~ ':~..wi.co. W1lr1YY ~ ~ .u..' .mow ~ ~~.1 . f r+~cw.r.rw _ ~ ~ , . V~ k ' • F {i -.Y ~ ~ V . r __._V.~~~.-.)7__-fit `~T ~ ~c~/ _ ' a c~ ~ ICI _ ~ _ . ~ ~ ~Mo 1r: . ~7 f-N' a I~ i - 1 _ ..r.. . Mercc, SgcrOsr~ t ~~ppce4 . /?rcldlccd n,..Wc _ _ ~ , , Wncacc ~ Is~r~~ µiW.rlW .I~MY ti W1 ' _ Ira Ia awu.uu tt ; ~ i... , . ,1 i / 11 0 a °a : o.r c A ~ w ' _ ~ ~ ~a ~l itr.~ia+: ~ 1 `y_, .1 ~ ` ~ „ , ~ ~~k~ fit{ ~.Fv_Ch o.aa, ~c . ~ r . •a«.: ~ . ~ 'w. _ ~I ~ UNIT ..SOUTH ~LILV.~.'~'Io.t.! ti~ ~ s~~ : ~ r.. . 1 ~ 13 . ~-~s~..~i . . . wt ~ SF~ K6LJ.e h+l'Md r:.p.LtNwwt\tiM :.•x4+1 ll~ v ;-'~W,drr e x VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1993 :Q~*P.~:11~ '~(l~f UNCIL CHAMBERS,.ry AGENDA 1. Discussion Re: Amendment 1. 2. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 3. Presentation Re: Vail Recreation District's (VRD) Proposals for the TOVNRD Recreation Services Contract. 4. Information Update. 5. Council Reports. 6. Other. 7. Adjournment. ~k~~~~~~~~~~~~k~ THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:WGENDA.WS VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1993 5:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 05:00 P.M. 1. Discussion Re: Amendment 1. Steve Barwick Steve Thompson Action Reauested of Council: Decide upon process and schedule for development of the Amendment 1 related ballot issue for November, 1993. Backaround Rationale: TOV will be required to reduce its revenues by approximately $1.5 million during 1994 unless Vail voters authorize TOV to keep the revenue and provide associated services. This discussion will be centered on development of the ballot issue for November, 1993. 05:45 P.M. 2. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 06:45 P.M. 3. Presentation Re: Vail Recreation District's (VRD) Proposals for the Rob Robinson TOV/VRD Recreation Services Contract. Action Reauested of Council: Give staff direction related to any further steps toward completing a contract. 07:00 P.M. 4. Information Update. 5. Council Reports. 6. Other. 07:30 P.M. 7. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:~AGENDA.WSE GAS ltt~vcu ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~.3 1993-1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS 1 Chapel Bridge Replacement 84,000 84,000 See 10 Relocate Back Flow Prevention PIT VTC 25,000 25,000 2 Regional Bus Purchase Match 59,000 59,000 3 ADA Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 4 Underground Storage Tanks 236,981 236,981 TOTAL 2f8,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 236,981 604,98f ESSENTIAL PROJECTS FOR CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS OF EXISTING SERVICES 5 Fire Truck Replacement 310,000 310,000 6 Replace Buses 1,050,000 1,326,000 1,160,000 3,536,000 7 Replacement of old Mobile Radios Fire 15,000 15,000 8 Emergency Building Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 9 Street Improvement Mtce Program 617,000 807,500 1,797,330 1,891,060 1,903,510 7,016,400 10 Parking Structure Capital Maintenance 73,954 315,365 204,857 183,000 180,000 957,176 11 Town Shop end Bus Barn Mtce Program 390,000 370,000 400,000 375,000 600,000 2,135,000 12 Drainage Improvements 43,086 113,341 68,830 87,345 97,940 410,542 13 Bus Shelter Replacement Program 20,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 14 Electric Raceway & Library Carpet 35,000 35,000 15 Street Furniture Replacement 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 16 Computer Oriented Irrigation 100,202 100,202 17 Covered Bridge Replacement 155,700 155,700 18 Replace Carpei in Muni Building 25,000 25,000 19 Resurface Muni Building Parking 14,000 14,000 TOTAL 1,339,242 2,896,906 3,887,017 4,085,405 2,846,450 15,055,020 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS WITH SAFTEY ISSUES 21 Fire Extrication Equipment 16,000 16,000 See 10 Lionshead Parking Electric Generator 15,000 15,000 22 Second Radio Channel for Buses 16,000 16,000 23 Street Light Improvement Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 24 Pulis Bridge Replacement 330,000 330,000 TOTAL 77,000 360,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 527,000 ESSENTIAL PROJECTS TO MEET INCREASED SERVICE LEVELS OF EXISTING SERVICES 25 Retrofit Buses w/ Perimeter Seating 17,500 19,348 36,848 26 Install New Bus Shelters 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 27 Relocate Checkpoint Charlie 220,350 220,350 28 West Vail Interchange Imp (Split With State 50/50) 170,000 100,000 270,000 29 Automate East Vail Interchange 9,900 9,900 30 HEF Capital Equipment 163,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 363,000 31 Implement New Shuttle Buses 420,000 769,375 2,068,375 32 Simba Run Underpass (TOV's Portion 30%) 210,000 555,000 765,000 33 Pay on Foot Express Lane VTC 21,899 21,899 34 Replace Lionshead Parking Equipment 131,888 35 Village Loading Facility 1,000,000 .a,~o~ 4,437,500 36 Additonal Bus Purchase 221,000 244,000 465,000 37 Pay on Foot and Express Lane ~ LH Parking 98,630 98,630 TOTAL 600,750 11,953,135 1,725,000 4,375,505 314,000 8,968,390 TOTAL OF THE ABOVE PROJECTS 2,234,992 +15,260,041 5,692,017 8,540,910 3,427,431 25,155,391 NEW INITIATIVE PROJECTS 36 Vail Valley Drive Ped Connections 308,023 277,546 131,700 717,269 37 Vail Road Medians 122,478 122,478 38 Vail Road Sidewalk 45,903 45,903 39 Development Enhancements 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 450,000 40 Sidewalk Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 41 News Paper Dispensers 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 70,000 42 1st Phase of Town Cemetery 0 0 43 West Meadow Drive 82,000 897,400 979,400 44 Frontage Road Widening & Landscape Medians 111,000 537,350 648,350 45 Ford Park Left Tum Lane 338,155 338,155 46 Pedestrian Zone Signs and Monuments 127,500 106,500 234,000 47 East Lionshead Circle (Per StreetScape) 44,300 487,300 531,600 48 Frontage Road Landscape Medians 122,731 122,731 49 Rebuild Entry to Muni Parking Lot 87,477 87,477 TOTAL 632,404 810,886 1,870,296 418,277 I 865,500 4,597,363 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS 2 867,396 6,070,927 7,562 313 8 959 187. 14 292 931 29,752,754 AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS 4,296,125 4,636,904 6,347,764 5,242,324 93cip 06-Apr-93 - TOWN OF VAIL Amendment 1 Discussion Summary of Revenue Limitation Provosed Process for Develovment of Ballot Issue Apri16 Develop a list of possible approaches to required reductions Apri120 Examine details of each different arr.oach Discuss the pros and cons of each Narrow the list to one or two approaches May 4 Discuss refined details of reduction approaches Choose final reduction strategy May 18 Review preliminary list of service level reductions June 1 Finalize and approve list of service level reductions Possible A~~roaches A) Across the board reductions 1. Identify fixed versus variable expenditures 2. Determine percentage of variable expenditures necessary to meet required reductions 3. Departments to identify their fair share of reductions in General Fund and Capital Projects Fund 4. Identify possible negative feedbacks (i.e., higher unemployment insurance?) B) IIiminate Town of Vail capability for dealing with growth 1. Identify savings in current and future budgets which would occur if services are frozen at current levels 2. Does this generate adequate savings? C) Reduce specific services 1. Identify services which could be provided by the private or non-profit sectors 2. Develop list of criteria for determining core governmental services 3. Prioritize operations based on set criteria - TOWN OF VAIL RECEIVED APR " Amendment 1 Discussion 6 1993 Summary of Revenue Limitation Provosed Process for Develovment of Ballot Lssue Apri16 Develop a list of possible arr~oaches to required reductions Apri120 Examine details of each different approach Discuss the pros and cons of each Narrow the list to one or two approaches May 4 Discuss refined details of reduction approaches Choose final reduction strategy May 18 Review preliminary list of service level reductions June 1 Finalize and approve list of service level reductions Possible Avvroaches A) Across the board reductions 1. Identify fixed versus variable expenditures 2. Determine percentage of variable expenditures necessary to meet required reductions 3. Depa.lu.ents to identify their fair share of reductions in General Fund and Capital Projects Fund 4. Identify possible negative feedbacks (i.e., higher unemployment insurance?) B) Eliminate Town of Vail capability for dealing with growth 1. Identify savings in current and future budgets which would occur if services are frozen at current levels 2. Does this generate adequate savings? C) Reduce specific services 1. Identify services which could be provided by the private or non-profit sectors 2. Develop list of criteria for determining core governmental services 3. Prioritize operations based on set criteria iQ THE DENirER POD t F. GILMAN SPENCER Editor WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETON, Chairman CHUCK GREEN , ' Editor of the Editorial Page . DONALD F. HUNT, Publisher + NEH. WFSTERGAARD RYAN McKIBBEN Executive Editor Executive Vice President and General Manager ISABEL SPENCER KHtK MacDONALD, VPAdvertising FRANK DIXON, VPOperaBons Sunddy Editor FRPfZANDERSON,VPFinance ~tatxHESSE,VPCinculation JEAh,~ r . a CHAVEZ JAMES BANMAN, VPHuman Res. KEN CALHOUN, VPMarkehng Associate Editor Colorado Su reme Court p should clarify Amendment 1 ` Z~ THEN ANTI-TAX crusader cases and review them at the ~/~l Douglas Bruce launched same time it responds to a bill in lawsuits against Northglenn and the legislature, SB 74, designed to Wheat Ridge to prohibit upcoming implement the amendment. elections in those cities, we chuck- Unfortunately, it may take the led that he may have written the high court some time to sort all so-called "Bruce amendment" but 'this out, and in the meantime, he apparently hadn't read it. The quite a few citizens and local offi- title to the measure, seen by every cials are in a quandary. In Golden, voter who passed on it last fall, for instance, some taxpayers are clearly stated that one purpose trying to force a special election was "to allow additional initiative ` in May to downsize a planned $6.1 "and referendum elections." million recreation center to a Everyone, even Bruce, admits more modest $1.5 million. That 'that Amendment 1's fine print does drive, which is fiercely resisted by . restrict the state and local govern- the city government, is certainly ,.merits to a yearly election in No- in the Bruce spirit of slashing gov- .>vember or to regularly scheduled ernment spending. But even if the ;.local elections on questions relat- taxpayers succeed in forcing a ,.ing to the tax and spending limits ~ new election, the Bruce arnend- imposed by the amendment itself. merit could delay a vote to recon- "But the Bruce-inspired lawsuits sider the project until November. "against Wheat Ridge and Norglenn By that time, Golden may have ,,are attempts to prevent their citi- built so much ~o€ the recreation ::tens from exercising their rights center that it would be impracti- _:under their local city charters to cal to scale it down. ;.vote on issues unrelated to the tax As complicated as the Bruce :sand budget limitations. Northglenn amendment is, the specific issue wants to sell some public land to of what elections are and aren't make a golf course and some resi- allowed shouldn't be so hard for dential areas. Wheat Ridge citizens the high court to sort out. When ;want to pass an election reform voters approved Amendment 1, measure May 4 to set new ground they intended to limit taxes and ,.rules for their city election next spending. Bruce is right in arguing '.fall. that special elections -with tra- Well, a pair of judicial gavels ditionally light turnouts -should -have now banged, and it's clear not be used to circumvent those that Bruce isn't the only one con- tax and spending limits. But that #used about the Bruce amend- is no reason to hamstring voters in "merit. Jefferson County District cities such as Wheat Ridge or :,Judge Michael Villano agreed Northglenn from settling local is- .with Bruce and ordered Wheat sues that don't alter the fiscal lim- Ridge not to hold its May 4 vote. its of Amendment 1. r~But Adams County Judge John When the issue does directly af- `~Vigil said Amendment 1's "ambig- feet government spending, as it uous" language couldn't override does in Golden, Amendment 1 lim- the clear rights of home rule cities itations on special elections should ;spelled out in the Colorado consti- apply - as ironic as that may be ;tution and told Northglenn to go in this specific case. That's be- ahead with its March 30 election. cause an exception to Amendment It is said that differences of 1 that might carry a taxpayer re- ~~opinion are what make horse volt to victory in Golden in May races. There're also why we have could be used another day by gov- , appellate courts. The Colorado Su- ernments to outflank their taxpay- l,it:; a Court should join these two ers in turn. .y VAIL GOLF CLUB JOHN A. DOBSON ARENA 30379-2260 321 Fau Lionshad Circk FORD TENNiS COMPLEX COr01dO 8K57 ail cre io MARKETING/SPECIAL EVENTS VAIL YOUTH SERVICES D I S T R I C T SPORTS Lia~d ci~k 303-479-2279 Pail, Cobndo et657 NATURE CENTER 292 West Meadow Drive • Vail, Cobndo 81657 303.479-2291 30379-2279 • FAX 303.479-2197 March 29, 1993 Ms. Peggy Osterfoss 75 South Frontage Road West Vail, CO 81657 Dear Peggy: The Vail Recreation District Board of Directors has amended their request outlined in the proposal sent to you on March 5, 1993. At the most recent board meeting they reduced the funding gap request to only the amount currently being received ($543,243). The Board believes this is in concert with the Town's line of thinking over the past five years. Namely, the District receives a constant funding amount independent of the Town's finances and other TOV department increases or decreases. The Board is cognizant of the fact that if your November funding request passes, that other TOV departments will likely receive an increase, but the Recreation District funding will remain the same. I hope this latest concession will help us in reaching an immediate agreement. In order to facilitate the signing of the agreement by April 15, 1993, board representatives along with myself will be at the April 6, 1993 Town Council meeting to make a quick presentation and answer any questions the council may have. Please find enclosed a copy of a draft of the management agreement and subsequent lease. Please call me at your convenience if you have any questions regarding the content of the Agreement or Lease. Sincerely, Rob Robinson Executive Director work\peggyi TOWN OF VAIL AND VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRI~ i AGREEMENT 1993 INDEX 1. PURPOSE 1 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT. 2 3. REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON. 2 A. Premises License. 2 I B. Terms and Conditions. 3 i. Use of Premises. 3 ii. Utilities. 3 iii. Access to the Premises. 3 iv. Alterations by the District. 3 v. Maintenance and Repairs. 4 vi. Assignment. 5 vii. Damage to or Destruction of Premises. 5 viii. Long Term Lease Assignment. 5 ix. Surrender of Premises. 5 x. Compliance with All Laws and Regulations. 6 C. Office Space. 6 4. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TOWN. 6 5. CONTROL OF THE JOHN DOBSON ICE ARENA. 6 6. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONSUViILL LEVY TRANSFER. ~ 7 7. GOLF, TENNIS, AND SKATING PASSES. 8 8. PARKING. 9 9. BOUNDARIES. 9 10. PERSONNEL. 9 11. LIABILITY, INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE. 10 A District Indemnification. 10 B. Town Indemnification. 10 C. Insurance. 10 12. Err~CTIVE DATE. 12 13. TERMINATION. 12 14. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 12 A. Modifications and Waivers. 12 B. Entire Agreement. 12 C. Binding Agreement. 13 D. Severability. 13 E. Authority to Enter. 13 F. Notice. 13 G. No Third Party Rights. 13 H. Specific Enforcement. 14 TOWN OF VAIL AND - VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of ,1993, by and between the TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO, a Colorado municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "T'he Town," and the VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT, a Colorado quasi-municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the District". WHEREAS, it is the desire of both parties to provide recreation programs and serviccs to the inhabitants and guests of the Town; and WHEREAS, the District has been providing such services under a previous agreement signed in January, 1989; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of both parties for the District to continue to provide these services; and WHEREAS, the Town and the District are authorized by the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Colorado, including Section 29-1-203, C.R.S., to enter into governmental agreements to govern the provision of such services to the inhabitants and visitors of the Town. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE. It is the general purpose of this Agreement for the District to continue.in the management and provision of all recreational services for the inhabitants and visitors of the Town of Vail. The Town and District agree that the District will hold an election in May, - 1994 to increase the District's mill levy in an amount approximately equal to the Town's expense of having the District administer the Town's recreation program. If the ballot issue passes, the Town agrees to reduce its mill levy by an equal amount and enter into long term leases on all real property outlined in paragraph 3. A., of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES TO BE PRnVIDED BY THE DIa i xICT. The District shall provide recreational programs and sen+ices. Such services and programs shall be of high quality and shall be of sufficient diversity and scope to meet the recreational needs of the inhabitants of the Town and the visitors thereto. 3. REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON. A. Premises License. The Town grants the District a license to use the following real estate, and improvements thereon set forth below and more particularly descnbed in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Premises"): , i. John Dobson Ice Arena and Environs; ii. Upper Floor of the Old Town Shop, except the Police Weight Room; iii. Nature Center; iv. Upper Bench of Ford Park; A v. Public Tennis Courts; vi. Athletic Fields; and vii. Youth and Teen Center 2 B. Terms and Conditions. The use of the Premises is subject to the following terms and conditions: i. Use of Premises. The Premises shall be primarily used for recreation programs and services except as otherwise provided for herein. ii. Utilities. The District shall pay all charges for gas, electricity, light, heat, power and telephone, or other communications services used, rendered, or supplied upon or in connection with said Premises, with the exception of the Old Town Shop and Youth and Teen Center, and shall / indemnify the Town against any liability or damages on account of such charges. iii. Access to the Premises. The Town and its agents shall have the right to enter in or on the Premises to examine them, to make and perform such alterations, improvements, or additions that the Town may deem necessary or desirable for the safety, improvement, or preservation of the Premises. iv. Alterations by the District. The District shall make no major alterations or additions to the Premises without the Town's prior written consent. All such work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner and all alterations and/or additions upon the Premises shall, unless otherwise agreed at the time the Town's consent is obtained or unless the Town requests removal thereof, become the property of the Town. The District may make minor improvements to the Premises in order to better serve the citizens and guests without written approval. 3 v. Maintenance and Repairs. The District shall take good care of the Premises and the fixtures and improvements therein including without limitation, any storefront doors, plate glass windows, heating and air conditioning systems, plumbing, pipes, electrical wiring and conduits, and at its sole cost and expense perform maintenance and make repairs and/or restorations when needed to preserve the Premises in good working order and 5rst class condition. The District shall be responsible for all repairs associated with the Premises, which do not involve replacements costing more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), including all interior, exterior, improvements and fixtures repair, snow removal, and rubbish removal, landscaping and lawn care. The repair, maintenance and replacement of the refrigeration system for the ice surface in the Dobson Ice Arena shall be the sole responsbility and cost of the District. The Town shall pay for replacements of all equipment, fixtures and improvements necessary for the proper functioning of the Premises, including replacements of structural and nonstructural components, plumbing facilities and equipment installed for the general supply of hot and cold water, heat, air conditioning, and electricity, which replacements cost more than five thousand dollars ($5,000). Such replacements costing less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) shall be the responsibility of the District. Replacements to be paid for by the Town shall, to the extent possble, be documented in ample time for inclusion in the Town's capital project list during the fiscal budget process. The Town shall not be responsble for the 4 replacements of any equipment damaged by the willful acts or negligence of the District. vi. Assignment. This license shall benon-assignable and the District shall not mortgage, hypothecate, or encumber arty of the facilities set forth herein without the prior written consent of the Town in each instance. vii. Damage to or Destruction of Premises. If any of the Premises are damaged by fire or other cause so that they may not be used for the purpose for which they were intended and the repair or replacement of such Premises shall require substantial cost, the Town may elect not to repair such damage and this license shall automatically terminate as it relates to said damaged or destroyed Premises effective as of the giving of notice by the Town of such election. viii. Lone Term Lease Assignment. The Town agrees that should the ballot question of the District mill levy increase be approved by the voters, The Town will, no later than July 1994, provide the District with a long term lease agreement for all real property constituting the Premises identified in paragraph 3. A., of this Agreement and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The lease for the Premises shall be consistent with the terms of this Agreement and will be for a period of not less than 44 years and at a fee of not more than $1 dollar per year. A copy of the lease agreement to be entered into between the Town. and the District shall, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, be substantially as contained in the Lease Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B. 5 - . ix. Surrender of Premises. Upon the expiration or other termination of this Agreement, the District shall promptly quit and surrender to the Town the Premises in good order and first class condition, ordinary wear excepted. x. ~omnliance with All ~.aws and Regulations. The District agrees not to use or permit the Premises to be used for any purpose or iin any fashion prohibited by the laws of the United States, or the State of Colorado, or the ordinances or regulations of the Town of Vail including the Town's no smoking ordinance, Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1988. C. Office Snace. In addition to the recreational Premises set forth in this Agreement, the Town further grants a license to the District to utilize the offices they are presently utilizing at the time of the signing of this Agreement in the Va~7 Public Library for continued use as office space only, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 3. B., hereof, except that the District shall not pay utility costs for said offices, which costs shall be the responsibility of the Town. 4. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE TOWN. The Town shall continue to provide the District with computer services at cost. 5. CONTROL OF THE JOHN DOBSON ICE ARENA. The parties understand the John Dobson Ice Arena is a multi-use facility utilized for both recreation and other purposes by the Town, and further understand the Arena is subject to certain terms and conditions contained in a Deed of Gift between the Town and the Websters, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as Exlvbit C.. The District agrees not to violate any of the terms and conditions of said Deed of Gift during the term hereof. The District's use of the Arena pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject 6 to all outstanding agreements between the Town and third parties for or relating to the use _ - of the Arena, which are listed on Exhibit D attached hereto. During the term of this Agreement, the Town shall have the right to use the Dobson Ice Arena for a total of twenty (20) days during each year of the term hereof for whatever purposes it deems appropriate upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice of such use to the District. The Town may exercise these twenty (20) days between March 15 and November 15. The Town shall be responsible and shall have the right to negotiate all terms and conditions of any activity or event the Town wishes to use the Arena for during said twenty (20) days. The District shall be entitled to receive the gross receipts or rent produced by any such event less all expenses and costs thereof. The Town further agrees to pay all associated hard costs during these twenty (20) days to include, but not limited to labor costs and electricity costs. 6. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS\MILL LEVY TRANSFER. The Town and District agree that in the best interest of their constituents that the District will hold an election in May, 1994 and further agree that they will present before the voters of the District, a ballot issue to raise the mill levy by the amount that 543,243 bears in ratio to the 1993 assessed valuation of the District, with an Agreement that if the ballot issue is approved, the Town will subsequently lower its mill levy by an exact amount. If the District's increase is approved, such mill levy changes will occur effective January 1, 1995. If the District's ballot issue fails to be approved, the Town shall have no obligation to lease the Premises to the District under paragraph 3. B. viii. and future management of the Premises shall be renegotiated by the parties; however this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unless otherwise terminated as allowed herein, until terminated on December 31, 1994. For the 1994 fiscal year the Town agrees to pay the District, contingent on funds being available and appropriated by the Town, an amount of S543,243. This payment shall be made to the District as follows: January 15% February 20% March 20% April 5% May 5% June 5% July 5% August 5% September 5% October 5% November 5% December S% In addition to any contrbution of the Town set forth in this Agreement, or any expenses paid by the District as set forth in this Agreement, each party shall pay those recreation related expenses which they respectively paid prior to the previous agreement signed in January, 1989. Should the Town not appropriate the $543,243, the District shall be able to terminate this Agreement as of December 31, 1993. 7. GOLF. TENNIS. AND SKATING PASSES. The Town will be charged by the District at the residential rate in effect at the time for each golf or tennis pass purchased by the Town as a benefit for its employees. Town employees who purchase recreation passes individually will be charged undei the s Town's regular rate structure. The District shall provide skating passes for Town employees at no cost. 8. PARKING, The Town will provide six (6) parking spaces for District employees at the Ford Park Parking lot and ten (10) parking spaces in the hospital lot, commonly referred to as the Mud Lot, free of charge. The Town will further sell to the District parking passes and coupons for the LionsHead parking Structure at the resident rate. 9. BOUNDARIES. The District and the Town will use their best efforts to take whatever steps are necessary to make the boundaries of the District and the Town coterminous. 10. PERSONNEL. The Town and the District and their respective officers, agents, and employees shall fully cooperate so as to facilitate the performance of this Agreement. The provision of recrcationa] services and programs as contemplated in this Agreement, the hiring, firing, and discipline of District employees shall be the responsibility of the District. No person employed by the District, in accordance with this Agreement, shall have any right to Town benefits including health insurance and pension. The District, however, may invest pension funds in the Town's pension fund subject to such conditions as may be established by the Town and permitted by law. The Town shall not be liable for the payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any District personnel performing recreation services pursuant to this Agreement, nor for any obligation of the District other than provided for herein. Nothing herein shall obligate the Town to be liable for the injury or sickness of any District employee arising out of his/her employment. 9 - 11. LIABILITY. INDEMNIFIC:ATICIN AND INSURANCE. A. District indemnification. To the extent legally permissble, the District shall indemnify and hold the Town, its agents, servants and employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of investigating any such matters, suffered or sustained by the District, its agents, servants or employees, or by any other person rightfully on or about the Premises arising out of any act, error, omission or negligence in the operation, maintenance or use of the Premises by the District, its agents, servants or cmployees or of any occupant, subtenant, visitor or user of any portion of the Premises, or any condition of the Premises or adjacent property; provided that this indemnity shall not extend to damages resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of the Town, its agents, servants or employees. District does not by this paragraph waive any protections or limited limitations contained in Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et. seq., C.R.S. B. Town Indemnification. The Town shall indemnify and hold the District harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees arising from the negligence of the Town, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns. The Town does not by this paragraph waive any protections or limited limitations contained in Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et. seq., C.R.S. C. Insurance. The District and the Town shall respectively provide their own public liability, property damage, and errors and omissions insurance policies sufficient to ensure against all liability, claims, and demands or any other potential io liability arising from this Agreement. Further, the District and the Town shall, , . subject to the approval of each parry's insurance carrier, name the other party as a coinsured under such insurance policies and shall furnish evidence of the same to the other party. In the case Hof any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage. The District and the Town may provide such insurance through programs of self insurance. Each party shall procure and continuously maintain the following minimum insurance coverages, or self insurance capability: i. Workman's Compensation insurance coverage in the statutorily prescrbed amounts. ii. The following types of insurance coverage in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per person and six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) per occurrence, or such limits as provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, and one million dollars ($1,000,000) aggregate: a. General Liability insurance coverage. The policy shall be applicable to all Premises and operations and shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage, personal injury, blanket contractual, products and completed operations. b. Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance coverage with respect to each of the parties' owned, hired or non-owned vehicles used in the performance of this Agreement. c. Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. 11 " • d. Liquor Liability insurance coverage if the District obtains a liquor license to serve wine, beer, or intoxicating liquors. Failure of either party hereto to maintain the specified policies or coverages shall constitute a material breach of this contract, upon which the non-breaching party may immediately terminate this Agreement. 12. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall become effective on the first day of January, 1994. l3. TERMINATION. A. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 1994. B. Upon termination of this Agreement as set forth herein, the District's license to use the Premises and all improvements thereon shall cease as provided for in paragraph 3. B. ix., hereof. In addition, the District shall return to the Town all equipment, vehicles, and personal property set forth on Exhibit A. 14. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Modifications and Waivers. No modification or waiver of this Agreement or of any covenant, condition, or provision herein contained shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by the party to be charged therewith. B. Entire Agreement. This written Agreement embodies the whole Agreement between the parties hereto and there are no inducements, promises, terms, conditions, or obligations made or entered into either by the Town or the District other than those contained herein. 12 G Bindine Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the w respective parties, their successors or assigns. D. Severabilitv. All promises and covenants herein are severable, and in the event that any of them shall be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, this Agreement shall be interpreted as if such invalid provision or covenant were not contained herein. E. Authority to Enter. The District and the Town have represented to each other that each possesses the legal. ability to enter into this Agreement. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that either of the parties did not possess the legal ability to enter into this Agreement, this Agreement shall be considered null and void as of the date of such court determination. F. Notice. Any notices to be sent to the parties pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be mailed to the following addresses: Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81658 Executive Director Vail Park and Recreation District 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 G. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement shall not be deemed to confer or grant to any third party any right to claim damages or bring any legal action or claim against either the District or the Town because of any breach hereof or of any covenant, condition, or provision contained herein. 13 * . H. Specific Enforcement. In addition io any other remedies available to the parties in law or equity upon breach, this Agreement shall be subject to specific enforcement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and the District have executed this lease as of the date first set forth above. TOWN OF VAIL, a Colorado municipal corporation By: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor, Town of Vail VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT, a quasi-governmental corporation sy. Ken Wilson, President, Vail Park and Recreation District 14 ~ LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1993, by and between the VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT, aquasi-municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Colorado, County of Eagle, hereinafter referred to as ("District"), and the TOWN OF VAIL, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, County of Eagle, hereinafter referred to as ("Town"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Town owns the real property listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the"Premises"}, which property is located within the District and is devoted to park and recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the parties have entered into an Agreement dated , 1993, whereby Town agreed to lease the Premises to District if District was successful in obtaining approval in a May 1994 election to increase its mill levy in an amount approximately equal to the Town's expense of having the District administer the Town's recreation program; and WHEREAS, District's mill levy increase was approved; and WHEREAS, both parties desire that District lease the Premises from Town and enter in to an agreement for the purpose of management and provision by the District of all recreational services for the inhabitants and visitors of the Town of Vail, for a term, at a rental and pursuant to the covenants, terms, conditions and other stipulations set forth in this Lease Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions set , ` forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: 1. Lease. Town does hereby rent, lease and let to District the Premises with all of the rights, privileges, easements and appurtenances attached thereto, for a term of forty (40) years for the purpose of management and provision of all recreational services for the inhabitants and visitors of the Town of Vail. Z. Premises. The real estate, and improvements thereon which are subject to this Lease Agreement are set forth below and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Premises"): i. Sohn Dobson Ice Arena and Environs; ii. Upper Floor of the Old Town Shop, except the Police Weight Room; iii. Nature Center; iv. Upper Bench of Ford Park; v, Public Tennis Courts; vi. Athletic Fields; and vii. Youth and Teen Center 3. Rental. The District shall pay the Town a rental of one dollar ($1.00) per year for the lease of the Premises. The District shall pay forty dollars ($40.00) in advance for the entire term within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Lease Agreement. 4. Terms and Conditions. The lease of the Premises is subject to the following terms and conditions: A. t Jse of Premises. The Premises shall be primarily used for recreation programs and services except as otherwise provided for herein. 2 v B. Utilities. The District shall pay all charges for gas, electricity, light, heat, power and telephone, or other communications services used, rendered, or supplied upon or in connection with said Premises, with the exception of the Old Town Shop and Youth and Teen Center, and shall indemnify the Town against any liability or damages on account of such charges. C. Access to the Premises. The Town and its agents shall have the right to enter in or on the Premises to examine them, to make and perform such alterations, improvements, or additions that the Town may deem necessary or desirable for the safety, improvement, or preservation of the Premises. D. Alterations by the District. The District shall make no major alterations or additions to the Premises without the Town's prior written consent. All such work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner and al! alterations and/or additions upon the Premises shall, unless otherwise agreed at the time the Town's consent is obtained or unless the Town requests removal thereof, become the property of the Town. The District may make minor improvements to the Premises in order to better serve the citizens and guests without written approval. E. Maintenance and Repairs. The District shall take good care of the Premises and the fixtures and improvements therein including without limitation, any storefront doors, plate glass windows, heating and air conditioning systems, plumbing, pipes, electrical wiring and conduits, and at its sole cost and expense perform maintenance and make repairs and/or restorations when needed to preserve the Premises in good working order and first class condition. The District shall be responsible for all repairs associated with the Premises, which do not involve replacements costing more than five thousand dollars (55,000), including all interior, exterior, improvements and fixtures repair, snow removal, and rubbish removal, landscaping and lawn care. 3 The repair, maintenance and replacement of the refrigeration system for the ice surface in the Dobson Ice Arena shall be the sole responsbility and cost of the District. The Town shall pay for replacements of all equipment, fixtures and improvements necessary for the proper functioning of the Premises, including replacements of structural and nonstructural components, plumbing facilities and equipment installed for the general supply of hot and cold water, heat, air conditioning, and electricity, which replacements cost more than five thousand dollars ($5,000). Such replacements costing less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) shall be the responsbility of the District. Replacements to he paid for by the Town shall, to the extent possible, be documented in ample time for inclusion in the Town's capital project list during the fiscal budget process. The Town shall not be responsible for the replacements of any equipment damaged by the willful acts or negligence of the District. F. Compliance with All Laws and Reulations. The District agrees not to use or permit the Premises to be used for any purpose or in any fashion prohibited by the laws of the United States, or the State of Colorado, or the ordinances or regulations of the Town of Vail including the Town's no smoking ordinance, Ordinance No. 11, Series of 1988. 5. Control of the John D~hs~n Ice Arena. The parties understand the John Dobson Ice Arena is a multi-use facility utilized for bath recreation and other purposes by the Town, and further understand the Arena is subject to certain terms and conditions contained in a Deed of Gift between the Town and the Websters, a copy of which is attached to this Lease Agreement as Exhibit B. The District agrees not to violate any of the terms and conditions of said Deed of Gift during the term hereof. The District's use of the Arena pursuant to this Lease Agreement shall be subject to all outstanding agreements between the Town and third parties for or relating to the use of the Arena, which are listed on Exhibit C attached hereto. During the term of this Lease Agreement, the Town shall have the right to use the Dobson Ice Arena for a total of twenty (20) days during each year of the term hereof for whatever purposes it deems appropriate upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice of such use to the District. The Town may exercise these twenty (20) days between March 15 and November 15. The Town shall be responsble and shall have the right to negotiate 4 y , . all terms and conditions of any activity ar event the Town wishes to use the Arena for during said twenty (20) days. The District shall be entitled to receive the gross receipts or rent produced by any such event less all expenses and costs thereof. The Town further agrees to pay all associated hard costs during these twenty (20) days to include, but not limited to labor costs and electricity costs. 6. Office Snace. In addition to the Premises listed on Exhibit A, the Town grants a lease to the District to utilize the offices it is presently utilizing at the time of the signing of this Lease Agreement in the Vail Public Library, or such alternate comparable office space that is agreeable to both parties, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 4., hereof, except that utility casts for said offices shall he the responsbility of the Town. 7. Services to he Pravided by the District. It is the intention of the parties that District shall provide all park and recreation programs in Tawn, and that the Town shall therefare not have the necessity of levying a tax an its citizens for this purpose, except as may be necessary for land acquisition by Town. The District shall provide recreational programs and services of high quality and of sufficient diversity and scope to meet the recreational needs of the inhabitants of the Town and the visitors thereto. 8. Parkin. The Town will provide six (6) parking spaces for District employees at the Ford Park Parking lot and ten (10) parking spaces in the hospital lot, commonly referred to as the Mud Lat, free of charge. The Town will further sell to the District parking passes and coupons for the Lonshead parking Structure at the resident rate. 9. Liability. Indemnificatian and Insurance. A. District Indemnificatian. To the extent legally permissble, the District shall indemnify and hold the Town, its agents, servants and employees harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of investigating any such matters, suffered or sustained by the 5 District, its agents, servants or employees, or by any other person rightfully on or about the , Premises arising out of any act, error, omission or negligence in the operation, maintenance or use of the Premises by the District, its agents, servants or employees or of any occupant, subtenant, visitor or user of any portion of the Premises, or any condition of the Premises or adjacent property; provided that this indemnity shall not extend to damages resulting solely from the negligence or willful misconduct of the Town, its agents, servants or employees. District does not by this paragraph waive any protections or limitations contained in Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, 24-10-101, et. seq., C.R.S. B. Town Indemnification. The Town shall indemnify and hold the District harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees arising from the negligence of the Town, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns. The Town does not by this paragraph waive any protections or limited limitations contained in Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, 24-10- 101, et. seq., C.R.S. C. Insurance. District agrees that it shall keep the entire Premises insured against loss or damage by fire in an amount equal to the replacement cost. If at any time during the term of this Lease or any portion of the Premises, or in excess of 25% of a structure shall be damaged or destroyed, said Premises or portion of building shall be promptly repaired, rebuilt, or restored by the District to the same good condition as existed immediately prior to such damage or destruction. Repair shall be at the District's risk and expense and in accordance with the plans and specifications mutually agreed upon at the time, or, if none can be agreed upon, then in accordance with the original plans and specifications. The work of restoration and rebuilding shall. be in full compliance with all laws and regulations and governmental ordinances applicable thereto. 6 e 10. Effective Date. This Lease Agreement shall become effective on the first day of January, 1995. 11. Termination. A. Term. The term of this Lease Agreement shall be for forty {40) consecutive one (1) year terms which shall be automatically renewed unless notice of non- renewal is given by District to Town sixty (60) days before the expiration of the then current term. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Lease Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2035. B. Surrender of Premises. Upon termination of this Lease Agreement as set forth herein, the District's lease of the Premises and all improvements thereon shall cease and the District shall promptly quit and surrender to the Town the Premises in good order and first class condition, ordinary wear excepted, and shall return to the Town all equipment, vehicles, and personal property set forth on Exhibit A. 12. Miscellaneous Provisions. A. Modifications and Waivers. No modification or waiver of this Lease Agreement or of any covenant, condition, or provision herein contained shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by the party to he charged therewith. B. Entire Agreement. This written Lease Agreement embodies the whole Lease Agreement between the parties hereto and there are no inducements, promises, terms, conditions, or obligations made or entered into either by the Town or the District other than those contained herein. This Lease Agreement shall, as of its effective date, supersede and replace all other leases or agreements now existing between the parties with respect to the Premises. C. Assignment. This Lease Agreement shall not be assignable without the written consent of the non-assigning party, and the District shall not mortgage, hypothecate, or encumber any of the facilities set forth herein without the prior written consent of the Town in each instance. 7 D. Bindine Agreement. This Lease Agreement shall he binding upon the respective parties, their successors or assigns. E. Severahility. All promises and covenants herein are severable, and in the event that any of them shall he hcld invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, this Lease Agreement shall be interpreted as if such invalid provision or covenant were not contained herein. F. Authority to Enter. The District and the Town have represented to each other that each possesses the legal ability to enter into this Lease Agreement. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that either of the parties did not possess the legal ability to enter into this Lease Agreement, this Lease Agreement shall be considered null and void as of the date of such court determination. G. Notice. Any notices to be sent to the parties pursuant to the terms of this Lcase Agreement shall he mailed to the following addresses: Town Manager Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81658 Executive Director Vail Park and Recreation District 292 West Meadow Drive Vail, CO 81657 H. No Third Party Rights. This Lease Agreement shall not be deemed to confer or grant to any third party any right to claim damages or bring any legal action or claim against either the District or the Town because of any breach hereof or of any covenant, condition, or provision contained herein. I. Snecihc Enforcement. In addition to any other remedies available to the parties in law or equity upon breach, this Lease Agreement shall be subject to specific enforcement. 8 r~ 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. VAIL PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT By: Ken Wilson, President A t 1 tST: By: Secretary TOWN OF VAIL By: Peery Osterfoss, Mayor A 11 tST: By: Town Clerk 9 r STATE OF COLORADO) l~ ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) The foregoing Lease Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of 1993, by as President and as Secretary of the Vail Park and Recreation District. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) The foregoing Lease Agreement was acknowledged before me this _ day of 1993, by as Mayor, and as Town Clerk of the Town of Vail. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 10 From The Vail Trail Vail,Colorado Fax: C3031-476-5849 Apr. 06. 1993 08:44 AM P01 a-fs•s~ I~ECEIVEO APR " 61993 X ~ . T~ G c, Town of Vail G~ ~ / 75 S. Frontatge Rd, veil, co e~f3s7 re; Vaii Recreation District Contract Renewal To the Vail Town Council, As working parents, we have came to rely an the Vail Recreation District's Youth Services Program to provide quafity ch11d care. We would like to share our thoughts and feelings wfth you. The VRD's Before and After Schaal Program, and the School's Qut Program is the answer t~o our child care dilemma. The convenience of having a child care program right in the school our daughter attends solves the transportation problem, And the flexibility of enroAment solves our budget and lrr~egular work schedule problems. With VRD, you don't have to commit to entailing your child on a regular basis it net needed. With most private childcare facilities, if you need an extra day here ar there, enrollment can be a problem. Most private facilities are full and have no extra room far your child on a day when school is out. With VRC7, you can enroll your child for whatever days are needed. And if our jabs require occasional extra hours or days, we don't have to worry about our daughter. We just call and enroll her in VRD's program. The quality of VRD`s program is truly Its best asset. The staff is second to none. These people are skilled and educated, and we can tail they really ~#ta be a# wank, with our daughter. They are mitring, fun and trustworthy. This is extremely important. Nat only do we feel good about sending our daughterto VRD's program because we trust the staff, but she laves to go because she has so much fun with them. The program of field trips, arts and crafts, games, movies and adventures offered by VRD is incredible. The kids never have a dull moment. They ga so many places..,field trips to local businesses, skating at Dobson Ice Arena, Herdic skiing at the Vaii Gaff Course, snow cat tours an the mountain, art shows at the Teen Center, gymnastics, and more. The program is wondertul. My sister and mother bade East are envious of such art interesting curriculum for our daughter to grow up with. Convenience. Affordabliity. flexibility. Quality ofstaff and curriculum. We feelthe Vaii Recreation District's Youth Services Program has answered the working class parent's child care problem. And it has given us a auafity program, Something we feel is not easily found. We urge you to renew the Vail Recreation District's Contract, so that we may continue to feel good about our child care choice. Thank You, Karen and Ran Spohrer $27-4236 FROM CRPP-Eagle County PHONE N0. 303 827 9210 P02 ° ~ • • - ~ • • . . ~ . ~ ° PROJECT • Ms: ,Peggy Osterfass . - ' , . ~ , • • • • ~ L ~ Mayor, Town of Vaii ~ ~ ~ L e, r/r~ • ~ Vail Tawn. ~€i"ices ' • ~ ~ ' ' ~A6 • Vail, CO ~ . • • April ~ 6, 1943' , ~ , . ~ ~ dear PeSgY~ ~ ~ • • • • , , • I unde~tand that toaight you ~vi1l be ditscassing with the 'I'QwII Council the topic of whether ar. not to return Youth Services, amantg • ~ ~ other .;,,..~„ation sexvic~se,, artder the u~brelta of the ~•tiwn of '~ai1 ' ' ~ • 1<nstead Of the V8al R•e~.,.:...tion District, ~ I .highly encaarage ~+au to • ecansider' the $tran(~ pt'dgraxrts Yvud3, Services ha.$ been. able to. . • . provide far our youth 1n the last five years under .the Vail Re~,.~.,~tian . DistriCt.• • We . •ttecd to provide continuing support for the +~i`fvrts ~d , • saccetsses Youth Strvice9 has been able Eo givC , to txu• comuunity. . ' As Faegle county. •c'aordinator. 'for the ,Central Rockies Prevention . - . Project, l would hope 'that you •,join us , im s~ppartuig alr~ah+ol aad other ' • , • dnsg ribose ~rcvCUtiou. 'The C'Ii.PP is; a .community partnorship • ' . 'federally fundod by' the ~Cntex fpt• Substance .Abuse ~reveniion in ' ' ~'G~I~nshingtou, D.C. under the ambrelYa of the Fifth Judicial district, tour ~ • • local; coalition in F~tgle Gavnty and supparti~?g groups such as ur~d . • , • have continetitng data, that . supports •heal.thy alternatives for our , • ' • ~ youth. In working with ~ the staff' at ~ Youth Scrvic~ I Nava seen first ' hand how 'wall they Gave ptgvided 'our yoieth with continuinng . ` ~.auppozt. ,I: think it is,• time to •~7tpresa °ta, t~iem how rnuclt we value . " their .efforts.. • ~ ~ ~ . • ~ I wouid~ hc~ ~ ghat you talre this tirno ~ tip •show both mare! ~d • ~ financial support of pragrains such, as ,Yautth ~exwices and to retetesf ' • ' their position undCt ~ the 'Vail .Itccrea~tian Di~sttict. I ,would a,1s3a . ' ettr~urage proposing a budget incica$c f~ all youth programs amd • ~ • . 'sorvic~s as at<tvthetf way to• shave your sups ~ for •pi~evention among . our ~ youth. • . , • ~ • • , • . • ° 'T'hank ,you for your earnest • consideration' on this matter. ~ ~ ~ , ' tncer l • ~ .Laurie •Mact~vish ~ ~ _ , . ~ • . , . •Podt Offloc t30X 486 • Brpctc~?rldpe• Colorado 804174 • (3D~f~453-148E • ~ax~{ap~y;5~-19pE1 x FROM CRPP-Eagle County PHONE N0. 303 827 9210 P01 Central Rockfes Preven#ion Pro,~ect/Eugle County Post pffice Box $$1, Minturn, Colorado $I64S Telephone 8c Fax - 303-827-9210 FAQ COVER ~~ET Location: tr Fax Number: ~'7~'-- ?~S ~ From: . r~.~"r Dace: L/~!~ / 9~ Pages sent incleiding cover: ,2. If you have any difficulty in receiving please call 303-827-9210. Notes: 03/28/93 18:40 $`303 329 6828 WOLF & 3LATKIN ~ ao1/oa8 ~ r `]tT~LF d~ SLATK~N ~ ~ ~ ettoFESStop~e_ cattroeAneta ATTORNEYS AT LA~1? 743 liARIL1GAN PLACB ~ONA7HAN L MADISON 3773 G'IiP1ti1I ..a,tci: !lOrIFi DRIVE DENVE$ Ct];.¢t!l1DQ tloZO9-58Z7 TELEPEiONE (3p'j} 355.2999 3m-~6 ~ p~tV~l..EGED March 26, 1993 VIA FAX TO 1-479-2157 Lawrence A. Eskwith, Esq. Town of Vail 77 South Frontage Road Vail, CO 81657 Re: Town of Vail Purchase of Vail C~+w..ons Property peax Larry: With respect to the four residential single-family equivalent tags owned by Vail Commons, Ltd. , I enclose a copy of a letter dated Dune 10, 1982, from Matt Dalton to day Peterson. Yam also faxing to you a copy of the Minutes of the Regular i~ieeting of the Board of Directors of the Va~.l Valley Consolidated Water District held Match 1.8, 1982. This will also confirm the offer that x re~,ayed to you regarding a resolution to the encroachment / easement issues. As I indicated to you, Vail Cammvns, Ltd. would agree to a reduction of the purchase price in the amount of $12,300.00 and assign the four residential taps to the Town of Vail. In exchange, the Town would waive its objection tv the encroachments and water line easement. The only remaining contingency would be the Town's approval of the environmental audit and Vail Commons receipt of a satisfactory appraisal. we look forward to hearing from you. Best personal regards. Very truly yours, ~ : WOLF .&'"~SLATKIN i Professional Co 'rani i'' ' r ~ JONA7,'Fi L . ZS(3N aCf Enc~.osures cc: Vail Commons, Ltd. Attn: Hud Wirth 03/28/93 18:41 X303 329 8826 ~YOLF & SLATKIN f~ 002/008 • f H. FIAROC.D c.ALKINS. P.C, CALK(N5, KRAM~R, GRIMSF'(AW & HARRlNG rwoNAS Y, YORNOw RUSSELL P, KRAMAR ~OFfN W. PNARKI3 MOLLY I. HOLDER RISC ARD L. HARRING ~ P~C~ A LAw PARTNERSNIp 1NGl.UDING VIC'YOR L wALLACE II, P.G. CHARLES E NQRTON GORPON f. GJIRRET7, P.c. PROPE351pNAL CgRPORATIONS DAVID C. IiA1L>:4RD R06ERT L, KIRBY. P_C. iU1TE ro00, FIRa'r NwTtOwAL DANK SY4D~wG RICMArtD F. MIPEkT RALPN L POUGNfR P.G. TERRY Gnglt JAAIgs R, SAI4EY. JR., P. G, Sgt iEVEN7'EEMYN sTAkR1P RICHARD t, SNEARER JOHN Jr TIPTON, t.c, DfNVER. COLORwod 00903 KEviN FLNNELL GILOER7 R, MapE15H, p•C. NATYHEw R. DAt7011 RICNARD E. STODOARD. P.C. TELEPNANE MARK C. POSTER WAYNE SCNROED[A, P,C. JONN A_ IECKGTEtN MARTHA S. T/~YLOR. P.C, OID31 SZO•t0D0 DAVIb w, ED6tROM Wd~oY J. HARRINQ FRkpERICK MUFF • ~[A~'C" COWARD J. 8LIE5ZN[R WARD L. VAM SGOoYK, P,C. soar ssa.s~/~ PAMELA M. MASTINas BRUCE E, DEACON T. eowARD IcENq¢t[ ,7i]tne i0, 19$2 c~v ~ eR,V?sKEN C. MICNA[4 iAYRE TED M. 4RIGHT OP cpYN3EL YtMOTMY E. YQUNG MICNAEL E, REfOY OANIEt M. CARSON NER6ERT R. ppplCA•~ ~ a DAVIa P, CAIN • nOw~rtcs Ohu it • ~ t ~ (l~ ~nnasOUw~ ~ O~s*w~CT M COLYWM }~~v_ 1F.I 2. AortrsCO Oxcr ' . ~..+aM "'day Peterson Otto, Peterson & Post P.O. Box 319 vazl, Colorado $1657 Re: Vail Valley Consolidated Water District/vai3 Com~uons, ~,td. Dear Jay: • Pursuant to your conversations wl.fh Mr. Bailey, =have attached hereto those minutes relating to your apgearance before the Board of Dixeotors at their regular meeting htld ~arcr. lam, l$8s, and the resulting agreement between the Board and you. on behalf~of your client, Vail Commons, Limited. 2f those minutes reflect your understanding of the agreement reached•at that meeting, please have the approval line below executed by the appropriate Vail. C?„~.~ns, Ltd. official, and return the ,letter with attached minutes to me as soon ss is convenient. 'hank you. ~ ' - Best regards, . CALICINS, ICRAMER, GRIMSFi'.A.W & HA1212ING atthew R. Dalton MRD:i7] Enclosure The above letter of agreement incorporting the minutes of the Vail Valley Consolidated Water District's regular meeting held Maxah 1B, 1992 is hereby accepted and approved by vazl Commons, Ltd. Vail s, Ltd. $Y" ~ ~ I .A.~ . of West Vail Development Corp, General ?artner 03/26/93 16:42 X303 329 6826 WOLF & SLATKIN ~J003/006 _ i ' ' RECORC3 OP' PROCEEDINGS ~ y MINUTES 4F REGULAR MEETING OF Tat, $dARD OF DZREGTORS OF . VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDA~~li WATER DISTRICT Held: Thursday, March 18, 1982, at 5:Q0 P.M., in the Wimbledon Room at The Mark in Vaxl, Co~,orado. Attendance A regular Board of Di,zectoxs meeting of ^the Vail . ~ Valley Consolidated Water District, Eag~.e County, 'Colorado was called and held as shown above, in accordance with the $pplicable statutes of the State of Colorado, with the following Directors present and acting: Edmund Drager, Jr. Bryon D. Brown x. Charles Ogilby Directors absent weze Director Mervyn Lapin and Director Robert W. Ruder, (absence excused}. Also in attendance were 7~uane D$vis, District Manager, Upper Lagle"Sanitati,on District, James Eyatt, Accountant, Upper Eagle Sanitation District, john Burgeso~t, P.E. , M & Y . , xnc. , Distr~.ct Engineer, James S. Bailey, J]C., District Counsel., - Jay Peterson, Counsel for Vail Commons, Ltd. Approval of The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Direc- Minutes tors k~eld February X$, 1982 weze amended to include in the paragzaph dealing with the water rights report an authorization for the opposition to the . Colorado River Water Conservation District's Edwazds Reservoir Filing, and the U.S.A. Black Lakes filing, iri addition to the opposition to the water rights f~.la.ng by the City of Pueblo . Addi~ tionally, the minutes were amended to zeflcct in the discussion relating to Simba Rur~ that Mr. • CoXiins has the right to inspect the sales con- tracts of Simba Run as of March 1, 1982, to deter-- mirie whether, in fact, Mr. Ray Storey had under cox~txact the number of units that he repzesented were presently under contract. Finally, the minutes were amended to reflect that the absence of Director Lapin st the previous District meeting was unexcused. contract the number of un~,ts that he ~repzzsented • werr presently under contrac* Finally, the ' mir. ~es were amended to reflec. that the absence of " ~ Dizector Lapin at tk~.e previous District meetinv was unexcused. Financiai The financial report gnd list of proposed disburse- Report ments were presented to the Board of Directors and ~:ere, upon motion duly made, seconded and unani- mously carzie~=, •approved. Green There was a discussion that the District wound • Mountain undertake certain expenses in the farm of the Leasing ' payment of eng~.neerXa~g fees and 1ec~a1 expenses to 03/26/93 16:42 'fd~`303 329 6826 ~YOLF & SLATKIN °1`~' °1° _ - \ t RECa~a QF pRO~~~o«~s assist in the negotiation of a water lease out of . Green Mountain to provide augmentation water to the District and to provide adequate snow-making water far Vail Associates. Mr. Collins has prepared a memorandum on the allocation of the costs involved which. memorandum• is attached to these minutes and . incorporated herein by this reference. Vail Mr. Jay Peterson appeared on behalf of Va~.l Gammons, Ltd•. Commons, Ltd. relative to pzoperty owned by that entity on the North Frontage Road. EIe explained that he and Mx. Collins had engaged in a.series of discussions in late November of 1381, anal that these was a misunderstanding as to the type of notice Vaix Commons, Ltd. was to receive regarding • potential raises in tap fees by the District. Mr. Peterson related that Vail Village West Water and Sanitation District, predecessor to the Dis- • txict, had received several vaXuable easements from Vail Commons, Ltd. and that those easements had been delivered an, a timelX basis when the car~- • tractor for Vail Village West was in immediate need of the easements. Mr. Peterson related that it was his understanding that, in exchange for the ease- ments, he would receive the not~.ce of any pending tap fee increase to permit his clients to prepay ' tap £ees at the ,lesser pre-hike rate. There was considerable -discuss~.vn .rexatiag to possible manner ' of resolving the misunderstanding •between the parties and it was, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, resolved that: In exchange for the easements previously granted by wail Commons, Ltd. to the Vail Village West Water and Sanitation District, the Vail Va~,ley C©nsoli- dated Water District would permit Vail Commons, • ' Ltd. to receive four free.residentiaJ. single famzly ' equivalent taps; provided that the talcs are to be ' used only for employee housing constructed puzsuant ' to the ordinances of the Town of Vail. All other taps related to the project will be paid for at the tap fee in existence at the time the taps are • purchased. Eng~.neer's John. Burgeson of I+! & I Engineering presented an Report engineering report in the form attached to these minutes and incorporated herein by this reference. Mr. Burgeson also re'oorted that they had reviewed the proposal from Woodward, Clyde and Associates tv • provide general water rights engineering to the District. r,nr1 ti f waet t}~o nnei t; ~n r+F tur r T ~~L'..~ mina es an incorporated hezein by this reference. • Mr ~urgeson also retiorted th .they had xeviewed thy. proposal from F~oodwazd, Cijae and .,Associates to ' pxovide genera]. water rights engineering to the Distx~.ct, and it was the position of M & z '•ttiat, based upon woodwazd, Ciyde's prior experience with the District, it would be moxe economical, and desireable to have frloodward, Clyde continue in that role. Mr, Surgeson and Mr. Helton of Woodward, Clyde are to communicate an a regular basis regard- ing water right issues. Thereupon, the proposal from Woodward, Clyde & Associates to prov~,de general water tights engineering serv~.ces, said propos~:_ being attached to these minutes and --2- 03/26/93 16:43 'k~'303 329 6826 WOLF & SLATKIN ~ 005/006 ' R~Ct]RD CJR ~'ROC~~DINGS ' incorporated i~erein by this reference was, upon motion duly made, seconded and unan.mously~carried, approved. Continuation There being no further business to come before the of Meeting Board, the meeting was continued until. Tuesday, April 6, 1962. Continued At the Continued meeting on Tuesday, April 6, 1982, Meeting the Board of Directors of the Vail Valley Consoli- dated Water District with Aixector Lapin nota in attendance were presented a report on an ~altern,a- tive system to deliver water to satisfy the needs of the Denver Metropolitan area along with a set of Principles of Part~.cipation intended for the purpose of permitting the .Vail Valley Consola.dated Water District to enter into discusszOnS with the Denver Water Board and other affected parties. Being informed that the Denver Water Board was reviewing the same Pr~.nc:ip7.es, the Board indicates that at the time the Denver Water Board commun- cated its finaz posa.tion the Board wou~.d favorably act to accept the Frinciples. •Adjourx~ment There being no further business to come before the ' meeting it was, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously caxri-ed, adjourned. Secretary for the Meeting . t MINUTES APPROVED, FORMAL CALL P.ND NOTICE 0~' MEETING WAIVED: c. . ~E~n~'und/H. agar, Jr. Bryon D. Brown r 1 ti t T. Charles' Ogilb~?-~~ . ,,y// e ~/f°/,~//,• " ` t S>h}~wrt id Uiir7or • "t. Charles' ogilby~~, 1 J~ e' , I , r ~ f Robert Zd. Rurdez 6 ,f~ Merv1nlLapln -3- • • f~~~•\ IM1~ ~ 03/Z6/93 16:44 x'303 329 6826 WOLF' & 51.A11StiV • ~ • j • + • p~raf~,aa8n •v.Ut~ CaMMo1~5. O~)V4L+~' 1 • :l . . l : ~ . _r o ~ j 4.~~.z • • t~ebf ~ p~ • • . • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ j ' ~ • • _ ulk~ Pied f~OFi' ~ P~,trf~"~I"f f • . ' • ~ t,,;. ~ vim:. c~r~orlo rx~v~?~R' . • ~ ~ ~ r~+r• e~e~:~ ~ n ~ • egg r ~ . . ~ ~ ~ err . 4 ..r+ . •,l~gy, ~~Kli~lidfr . j+,a,p~sN!s 6~'~L.I~E ..~17bti . 001-? soaa7s21~7;~ ~ 5ENT BY~Xerox Telecopier 7021 4- 6-93 ;11~18AM 633 ~ ~ . W. ~ ~ na+tV~. ooree~vosoma ,fi'r`' t ~ '1'ffi,iPACt~i~ 908 s~F~900 ~ : • _ 3~ 1 ~ IiUG 908 ~VbG910 air.at Dial (303) Z99•sZ1B April 6, 1993 ~1' ECQ~ ORIGINAL BY FLD~RA~SS Iacry Eslewith, E9q. Town Attorney Town of Vail 75 5. Frontage Road Wear Yail, Coloradn 81657 boar Iarry: We are picased to submit thin proposal to act as Intw3m Town Attorney fQr the Town of Vail after your dep~,.~.ulu and prior ba the huutg of a replacement. Shuman & FIoward is a full aervicc law 6rm with afScea is Denver and Colorado Sprlags, Colorado and is Las Vcgas and Reno, Nevada. The frm canisists of apprcmimateiy 901awytrs organized mta the following departments: Public Fiaactce, Litigation, Bnsincss and Rent Estate, Employment Law, and Tax and Probate. Enclosed is a brochure describing the firm. If we era selected to act as interim Town Attorney, I would be the lawyer pdncigatty responsible for the algagement. Although my gractice currtAtly involute prindpaIIy munidpal bond wort, I have aetved as gcaeral counsel to the Colorado Student Qbligadon Bond Authority, Colorado Postsecondary Educational Facilities Authority, the East Bclleview Water and 5anitadon lhstrict and the Timt~ers Water and Sanitatiap District. I was staff attomcy far the Colorado Mwucipal League from January 197b bo November 1977, and worked as a law dent in the City Attorney's of5ce in the t~iy of Lek.. ~ ~ ..ad during law schat~i. I ourrtntly advise a number of public entities in Colorado sad Nevada cogcernittg . pablic finance matters. Enclosed is a deacrigdon o£ our Fublle Fir~ancc Dep~;..,ent and my biograplucat inforamtioA. SENT BY~Xerox Telecapier 7421 ; 4- 6-93 ;11~18A~1 ; 001-? 3g3478z1~r;i~ ~il~.. aaa~31 ~Li ' ~QW8.1'C~ 7,srry F.,sIfwith, Esq. April b, 1993 Page 2 If vre are rngagCd as interim Tows Attorney, I would anticipate that other firm lawyers from time to Lima will worm on TowA matters d.~.~,.~.ding upon the issues involved and the relevant earpertisa of various firm lawyers. Alth6ugh our hourly rates vary depending upon esperienee and practice area G.r.~ $95 to $260 (my ra#a is cr~trontly $225), we would charge the Taws a blended rate oi' $155 far sll lawyer time devoted to Town ~aatterx. Far time ea~ded by legal assistants we would bill based upon theft applicable hourly rates, which range from $35 to $75. we would also bill for our reasonable out-Qf-pocket expenses. We would submit bills to the Tavm on a monthly basis and theca bills would include narrative describing the work done by our personnel oa each date. If the Town Counca~ is interested in a dil~,.,.~...t billing a.x~..a;~...ent, we would be willing to eousider other options as proposed by the Town Council. If the Tows Council i$ interested in caploring this propnaai further, I would be happy to meet with the Counra'1 and staff to discuss in more detail how it aught be implemented, y. P. wiser r~Pwf~ r D I S T R I B U T I O N TO Distribution FROM Frank McNeill. Vail Skier Services Department DATE March 11, 1993 RR Customer Survey Report Kent Myers 2 Jerry Oliver 33 Brad Quayle 2 Chris Ryman 33 Andy Daly 3 Mike Beckley 41 Paul Testwui.de 6 Ben Eddings 41 Marvin Gray 9 Bob McIlveen 42 Jim Roberts 9 Greg Tracey .42 Joe Macy 10 Beaver Creek Security 46 Mike Larson 10 George Cooper 48 George Gillett 13 George Hudspeth 48 Gerry Flynn 15 Marketing 49 Food Service 16 eooie Alward 52 Paul Golden 16 Jack Hunn 53 Ticket Operations 18 Information Systems 54 Dave Larson 21 B.C. Ski Patrol 65 Lift Operations 21 Brian McCartney 67 Mountain Services 23 Bobsled 67 Les Marsh 26 Retail 77 Susan Rodgers 26 TV 8 95 Attached is the Vail -Skier Services Survey Report for the week ending March 11, 1993. Please distribute copies within your department as necessary y Skier Services Survey Week Ending March il, 1993 Total surveys: 224[1645] Hometown: Local/CO: 19[242] North East: 48[338] South East: 08[132] Mid West: 40[287] South: 10[157_] North West: 01[30] West: 14[188] Europe: 10[71] S. America: 00[04] Asia: 00[02] AusjNZ: 04[39] Other: 01[07] Canada: 02[16] Mexico: 00[43] What chair area do you like to ski during the first part of the day? Ch 1 03[05] Ch 5 08[13] Ch 11 18[26] Ch 2 44[70] Ch 6 02[06] Ch 12 02[03] Ch 3 02[03] Ch 7 08[17] Ch 14 01[04] Ch 4 32[60] Ch 8 18[31] Ch 2i 11[17] VB 30[00] Ch 10 01[05] Ch 19 12.[00] Ch 17 04[00] Ch 9 02[00] What has been the most\least positive part of your experience in Vail? Most positive: Grooming. [04] Everyone is friendly. [18] Wide open runs. [03] The size of the area. [07] Variety of. terrain. [07] The beauty of the place. Number of lifts . High speed quads. [03] The weather. [08] Great snow! Children's ski school. [03] Clean. The skiing! Great all around atmosphere. Good maps and trail signs. The service is above average. Enjoyed the Meet the Mountain tour. [March 9] Happy and friendly staff. Outstanding conditions. The back bowls. China bowl.[04] Good terrain for experts. Least positive: No discount tickets. Poor discount on multi-day. Sell a 20- 30 day ticket. Parking is expensive. Lift lines. [07] Flapjack is scary at the end of the day. [02] Crowds.[13] Too expensive! [10] v Love the BHQ. Everything's great. Terrific. Well marked. Great atmosphere. Crowded. Impressive. Good service. Breakfast was great- too bad it was discontinued. GOLD PEAK: Good fries. Like pasta salad. WINE STUAE: Excellent. How did you learn which runs were groomed today? Sign at lift. [23] Grooming board at the bottom. [68] Grooming board at the top of 4. [03) Village ticket office. Trial and error. Mid Vail grooming board. [03] Don't care. [15] By looking from the lift. Vail Ski and Boot. Word of mouth. Didn't know. TV 8. [24] Skier Services. [05] Ski instructor. [03] What can we do to make the groomed trails easier to find? Highlighted maps. [03] Symbol on the trail sign. It's easy the way it is. You do a fine job. Get a list with lift tickets. It's fine. [10] Arrows at trailheads. Groom some of the same runs each day. [05] Do you know how to return to your starting point at the end of the day? Yes 110[169] No 04[07] The map is confusing at the bottom regarding getting to Gold Peak. I know the mountain, but the map is confusing. Follow signs. Use the trail map. Good maps. General comments about Vail Mountain? Something great to ski everyday. Fantastic place. Would like to see a private club like Heano's. a D I S T R I B U T I O N TO Distribution FROM Frank McNeill Vail Skier Services department DATE March 18, 1993 RE Customer Survey Report Kent Myers 2 Jerry Oliver 33 Brad Quayle 2 Chris Ryman 33 Andy Daly 3 Mike Beckley 41 Paul Testwuide 6 Ben Eddings 41 Marvin Gray 9 Bob McIlveen 42 Jim Roberts 9 Greg Tracey 42 Joe Macy 10 Beaver Creek Security 46 Mike Larson 10 George Cooper 48 George Gillett 13 George Hudspeth 48 Gerry Flynn 15 Marketing 49 Food Service 16 Booie Alward 52 Paul Golden 16 Jack Hunn 53 Ticket Operations 18 Information Systems 54 Dave Larson 21 B.C. Ski Patrol 65 Lift Operations 21 Brian McCartney 67 Mountain Services 23 Bobsled 67 Les Marsh 26 Retail 77 Susan Rodgers 26 TV 8 95 Attached is the Vail Skier Services Survey Report for the week ending March 18, 1993. Please distribute copies within your department as necessary r Skier Services Survey Week Ending March 18, 1993 4 Total surveys: 103[1748] Hometown: Local/C0: ]6[258] North East: 69[407] South East: 00[132] Mid West: 27[314] South: 16[168] North West: 00[30] West: 11[199] Europe: 06[77] S. America: 01[05] Asia: 00[02] Aus/NZ: 00[39] Other: 00[07] Canada: 02[18] Mexico: 00[43] What chair area do you like to ski during the first part of the day? Ch 1 00[05] Ch 5 06[19] Cfi 11 04[30] Ch 2 22[92] Ch 6 06[12] Ch 12 00[03] Ch 3 04[07] Ch 7 07[24] Ch 1.4 03[07] Ch 4 19[79] Ch 8 13[44] Ch 21 02[19] VB 15[15] Ch 10 02[07] Ch 19 06[18] Ch 17 00[00] Ch 9 00[02] What has been the most\least positive part of your experience in Vail? Most positive: Friendly service.[18] Love the great snow.[12] Organized mtn.[02] Groomed runs.[07] Lift lines are short and fast. Tissue boxes are good. Variety of terrain.[17] High speed quads.[02] Powder![07] Back Bowls.[11] Size, Big mountain.[07] Excellent skiing.[10] Children's ski school.[03] Slow skiing areas. Wasn't crowded. Everything was great. Enjoy the ski area. Great shuttle bus system. Least positive: Crowded.[06] Nothing negative.[10] No Powder, cold. Congested areas, scary for beginners. Lack of seating in mtn. restaurants at lunch time. Expensive.[08] Long lift lines.[13] Parking.[05] Two Elk needs to be bigger. Obnoxious skiers.[02] Crowded ticket windows. More groomed green runs. ~ CAMP ONE: It's about time. Great idea. Maybe another one somewhere. WILDWOOD: Loved it. Food is good and hot. TRAILS END: Need more variety. All other restaurants are too crowded. Good variety of food. Lunches are very good. How did you learn which runs were groomed today? List at lifts.[13] Grooming board at base.[33] T.V 8 [25] Grooming board top of ch.4.[06] Didn't.[17] A friend. [02] Skier Service.[10] Instructor.[02] Grooming list at Sonnenalp. What can we do to make the groomed trails easier to find? You do a great job.[11] Groom more intermediate.[02] Do the same ones all the time. Have bigger signs. Have a handout.[03] Post the groomed runs at the top of the chairs from which they can be accessed. Divide up mtn. like Breckenridge and only groom one area at a time. Have more signs.[06] Have big yellow feet stuck in the snow denoting where to go. Have a flag at each sign. Highlight map. Tell all personnel. More grooming boards.[02] Electric grooming board.[03] Post obvious signs at top of lifts. Do you know how to return to your starting point at the end of the day? Yes 99[268] No 02[09] The mountain is big. General comments about Vail Mountain? Nice experience. Tons of fun. Don't see Ski Patrol out on the mtn. Great, love it. Nice place to vacation. YAHOOOOO! Well maintained. . ~ - - _ t~ ~~~r x - z-• _ t., _ ~ V A Exploring Today`s Realities- . 1'`' . ~ R. , 1 ? a. ~ ~ - . _ K-.. t" April 7, 1993 A CONVERSATION AMONG ~ CITIZENS OF BULGARIA, RUSSIA & THE UNITED STATES r f Featuring: f Guest panelists from Bulgaria and Russia in ' dialogue with the audience ~r~_ Moderated by Merv Lapin Vail Town Councilman _ The Radisson Resort, Vail i Breakfast at 7:30 A.M. Program at 8:00 AM. Cost is SIS per person Reservations n~.:,...u.ry: Ca11476-0954 The Symposium Breakfast Series is organized for mui open to the public e . town of rail Personal Memo from . Caroline J. Fisher To: Vail Town Council From: Caroline Fisher Date: April 1, 1993 You will find attached a copy of a survey sent to all Vail businesses in follow-up to our new traffic restrictions and loading zone plan in the Village core. If you have any questions regarding the survey, please contact Tom Sheely at 479-2352, or me, 479-2115. r X11 Iy TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 IS IT WORKING ? 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 We'd like to know! It leas now been over four months since the Vail Town Council implemented a revised approach to parking and delivery within Vail Village. The Town Council and Town of Vail staff would like to hear howyou think it is working. Thank you for taking the time to answer the questions below. Please drop the questionnaire off at Checkpoint Charlie or mail it to the Town of Vail Police Department, 75 South Frontage Road West, Vail, Colorado 81.657. To discuss this matter further, please ca11479-2210. Please check the box that best describes vour views re~ardin~ this issue. 1. Impact of the new traffic restrictions on the overall 4. This winter the Community Safety Officers appearance of Bridge Street: (CSO's) were: ? Strongly improved appearance ? Very friendly ? Slightly improved appearance ? Somewhat friendly ? No change ? Somewhat unfriendly ? Slightly detracts from appearance ? Very unfriendly ? Strongly detracts from appearance ? Don't know ? Don't know ? Explain: ? Explain: 2. Impact of the new loading zone restrictions 5. For next season, the CSO's should: on my business: ? Be more persistent on traffic control and ? Strongly enhances my business keeping Vail Village clear of vehicles ? Slightly enhances my business ? Have the same approach to traffic control as ? No change this year ? Slightly detracts from my business ? Be less controlling and more permissive with ? Strongly detracts from my business traffic/parking requests ? Don't know ? Don't know ? Explain: ? Explain: 6. Is your business located on Bridge Street? 3. In the future I would like to see: ? More restrictions on the traffic/parking What type of business do you own? ? About the same level of restrictions ? Retail ? Less restrictions on the traffic/parking ? Restaurant/Bar ? Don't know ? Service ? Explain: ? Other 8. My suggestions for remedying the traffic congestion in Vail Village include: (Please use This year has been a trial period for the remised parking back if necessary) and delivery plan. Yoicr input will help rrs plan for next year as we work together to address both aesthetic and economicneeds in thisarea. Tlrankyorc for your assistance and we look forward to working with. you in the facture. I Economic Development: ° W ~ ] W~; x 3 KEELING ~ ~ ~ ° a ~ a o Economic Development: COLORADO ~ ~ COMPETITIVE ~ ~ KEEPING ° ~ ° ~ COLORADO > A statewide conference on economic development issues o facing Colorado and its communities. w ~ 0 COMPETITIVE > Will focus on the economic development challenges ~ e unique to our state as well as national issues of the'90s. 3 Colorado's first statewide conference ~ on economic development -Featuring - ~ - y .A'~k s 1`11 Opening remarks by Governor Roy Romer ' gym. ~ " WEDNESDAY APRIL 1~Tn }'t ~ _ .,~.~,,1 ~ sue- Ut r ~ ~ f ~ ->y~Y ~ ~ _ { c ~ ~ ~ ~ THURSDAY, APRIL J 5TH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,n Denver Marriott Hptel Cit Center ~ ~ ~ ~ ~70~ California Street Keynote address by Jerry McMorris, r ~ 0 ~ l0~ Chairman and CEO ~ ~ ~ \9~ Colorado Rockies , < - ~ ~ ! ~ 0 ~ PfriGtiED ~~u~ ~ ~IRSi :;A:3 ~ ~ ~ s~ ~,n~~ ~ ~ ~ . Sponsored by ~ ~ ~ 3 1876 ~ ~ ~ ~ Presented ~ am ~ Bi1SlI1eSS ~~OIl11l~ ~ a~i p ,a°' The Colorado Economic y~ w ~ ~ j ~ Devela merit Commission ~s~•.tr~~1~ p Public ~ ~ ~<< ~ ~ ~ ~ The Stage ee o Merrill6ynch ~ f Business Development iv ~ ~ c-~~. ~ ` x- i oc tr~i3~/l RRR1: ' i i REGISTRATION FORM g CONFERENCE AGENDA , - ~ Please confirm my complete conference reservation as follows: WEDNESDAY APRIL 14TH THURSDAY APRIL 1STx or ' ' _ ~ Please confirm my reservation for the April 15~h Closing 10:00 A.M.-11:30 A.M. 8:00 A.M.-8:45 A.M. ~ Luncheon ONLY as follows: Registration Late registration and Continental Breakfast Name. 11:30 A.M.-1:00 P.M. 9:00 A.M.-11:00 A.M. ~ Organization Opening Luncheon with Governor Roy Romer Attend one of two panel discussions: Address 1:30 P M.-3:00 P.M. EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: Attend one of two panel discussions: AN EVOLVING PARTNERSHIP ~ Ciry State Zip A discussion regarding the link between the state's ~ Telephone ( 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHO'S ON FIRST? education system and its economic future. With so many players in the economic development ~ PANEL SELECTIONS (choose a total of three panels) arena, panelists will discuss where projects start, who's in ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: charge and how they work together. THE MEDIA PERSPECTIVE ~ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 14~" GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS: A conversation with some of Colorado's leading journal- ; 1:30 P M.-3:00 P.M. RESPONDING TO CHANGE, fists and media executives on the power and responsi- ~ ? Economic Development: Who's on First? bility of reporting the state's economic activities. How government and business are dealing with a ~ or changing climate for economic development in 11:30 A.M.-1:00 P.M. ? Government and Business: Responding to Change Colorado. Closing Luncheon with Keynote Address by Jerry ~ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 14T" McMorris, Chairman and CEO, Colorado Rockies 3:30 P.M.-5:00 P.M. Coffee Break _ i ? Economic Development The Financial Community's Perspective 3:30 P.M.-5:00 P M. Conference registration fee: $35~ per person; ~ °r Attend one of two panel discussions: includes conference materials, panel discussions, ~ ? Defense Conversion: Strategies far the Future both luncheons, continentaC breakfast and cocktail ~ THURSDAY, APRIL 15T" ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: parry ~ 9:00 A.M.-11:00 A.M. THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITIPS PERSPECTIVE Thursday, Aptil I5~ Closing Luncheon: ONLY: ~ ? Education and Economic Development: An Evolving Partnership The outlook for Colorado as viewed by leading financial $~5~ per person. or experts. ; ? Economic Development: The Media Perspective Return the attached registration form., or for further ~ . DEFENSE CONVERSION: details call. the conference tnessage line at (303) ~ ? Enclosed is $3Sm for complete conference registration. STRATEGIES FOR THE FUTURE 892.3778. ~ ? Enclosed is $Z5m for a reservation for the April 15~h A discussion on what the state's overall approach should Advance registration.: is tequiced. ~ Closing Luncheon ONLY. be to defense retention and conversion issues. Only one person per registration form, please. Registration forms maybe Special preferred room rates are available for confer> " duplicated, or call the conference message line for additional forms. 5:30 P.M.-7:00 P.M. ence artici ants at the Denver Marriott Hotel Ci ; Cocktail Reception, sponsored by p p Make checks payable to the Colorado Economic Development The Coors Brewing Company Center. Call the reservations department at (303) Commission. 291.1300, and mention the Economic Development ~ Written confirmations will be sent. Conference. ~ Return to: Economic Development: KEEPING COLORADO COMPETfiIVE 1313 Sherman Street, Room 518 ~ Denver, Colorado 80203 ~Q-u-J 0 ~ OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ~-c Dedicated to protecting and improving fhe health and environment of the people of Colorado - 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building ~ X876 ~ ~ Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 4210 E. 11 th Avenue Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80220.3716 (303) 691-4700 Roy Romer Goverrror COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division fxecufive Director MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties ~.;;~,\~~t FROM: Dick Parachini, Eagle Mine Project Manager DATE: March 26, 1992 SUBJECT: State Air Monitoring Results -December 1992/January 1993 Enclosed is a summary of the air monitoring data collected in front of the Minturn Middle School by the State of Colorado during the Eagle Mine remedial activities. These units have been in operation since the beginning of the school session this fall at the Minturn Middle School. This data is used in the ongoing health assessments conducted for the site. Paramount has discontinued its air monitoring during the winter season at the site as allowed under the Remedial Action Plan. The State has continued operating the station in front of the Minturn Middle School in response to concerns from local interests about not having any air monitoring during the 1992-93 winter season. The monitoring frequency was shifted from the t- in -3 day schedule to the 1-in-6 day schedule beginning December 2, 1992. The State air monitoring station will be operated until the beginning of construction activities in 1993. The metals analysis for October 28 is included in this report. No data was collected on January 7, 1993 because of a gasket leak around the filter. If you have questions about the air monitoring requirements or results, please call me at 692- 3396. Date TSP Pb Cd As ug/m' ug/m' ug/m3 ug/m' 10-28-92 14 <0.02 <0.002 0.0008 12-O1-92 24 <0.02 <0.002 0.0011 - 12-02-92 15 <0.02 <0,002 0.0005 12-08-92 10 <0.02 <0.002 0.0013 12-14-92 12 <0.02 <0.002 0.0019 12-20-92 6 <0.02 <0.002 0.0011 12-26-92 10 <0.02 0.003 0.0019 Ol-Ol-93 4 <0.02 <0.002 0.0009 01-07-93 Gasket Leak, Sample Invalid DP/dp ~ • - 1993 ~ TOLLFREE -1-800,'i32-3327 or 892-7111 ¦ ¦ a~ oo ~n or a own mans er. Hardworking leader _ ~.r - ~ .gib: must handle a variety - - - 3 of roblems in the ski • ~k 4 ~ ~ _ lss~< u resort, official says ~ _ ~ ~y ~ Kent S. Smith ~ ~ _ ~ _ . a. `4 x ` ~ !Qoa6y Mowttaia Naps StgJ~`Wsiter ~ µ ~ ~ t ~ The new town manager of Vail will be a >.i r~ ~ ~ ~ ~°F ~ardworlcing person with excellent leader- ~ ~ - }_n~ • . ;hip skills and a sense of humor. ~ a " Former town manager Ron Phillips held ~ 4 ~ he job for almost nine years before leaving .o start a consulting company. Vail personnel director Bob Mach wants .o fill his shoes by summer. "If I had to pick a critical success factor or town manager, probably it would be eadership," Mach said. "In a large resort community, leadership ~~,~,~_o snot just running the town, it is leading the :ommuniry, dealing with the Vail Asso- sates, the lodge owners, visitors, resi- cents, everybody." He described Vail as a "diverse, complex ~ :ommuniry" with a healthy tourist/drier ~o ulation that s; p peaks at 25,000 visitors a lay during the ski season. Only around 3,700 people live in Vail year-round. The number of people visiting luring spring, summer and winter is grow- ng, though, augmented by the increasing lumber of companies holding business neetings there. "Each of these groups present a unique problem or challenge to the town manager, - ~nd he or she must be able to respond to everybody, and balance it all out within the Budget," he said. _ Duties will include managing an annual ~ j • - ~udget of $23 million and approximately :00 Year-round empl,.y..~s. Vail _ ~ - _ , personnel director Bob Mach says the town's tourist/skier population peaks See PAIL on 9C at X5,000 visitors a day during the ski season. r Vail mans er works long hours g ~/A~L from iC T~ compensation package includes a "substantial" salary, a "very comfortable" • home and a car. Salary wdl depend on The town manager is to an elected eZpenence and training. i . ~ ~ ~ , oamcfi. Vafi is a homne-n~le muniapal- "T'bis is a fantastic living en ~,,..ment, ity, and the town charter invests specific especially for a family, since there is almost powers in the t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ..manager's job. ao crime. Right now I'm watching several Requirements include a bachelor degree ells walluz?g up a hill,» Mach said. and at least five years of managerial "T'his is where you come io live a once in a government setting, preferably in outdoors-type of life. You don't hear people a sim~ar resort ens:. ~wment. A master's tallang about what was on TV the night degree is preferred. before. Instead, they say, 'yeah, T fished for The ideal applicant wfil be an effective three hours last night after work' or `we oommurucator who can deal with a variety rode our mountain bikes over the pass of people and interest groups. Financial before dark.' " management skills are essential. Those interested should send a resume "We need someone who is very people- and references to Carmen Slagle, Person- oriented and professional. This person nel Department, Town of Vail, 75 S. Front- must have lots of initiative and be very, age Rd., Vai181657 by May 31. very dedicated to the job, since hard work and long hours are required, as much as 70 General Employment positions are listed in to ?5 hours a week,"Mach said. Classification 1205, page 6C. • Sun, Mar 2&,1993_+ 1go`~c Wt~ud _ ~ , TOWN MANAGER ~>moFY , a VAIL, COLORADO The Town of Vail, North America's premier ..:y..~ is seeking a chiei executive. Vail, a home rule municipality, has a population of 3700 year 'round with an additional 25,000 visRors each day during the skt season. The Town of Vail has an annual budget of $23 million and approximately 200 employees with additional r - " ~ seasonal employees during the summer and i ' " winter. The Town Manager reports to an elected - Town Council according to the regulations of a " : _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ - town charter that specifies a strong Town Manager form of government. We are looking for an individual with 5 + years of governmental managerial or comparable experience, preferabley in a resort environment. A Baccalaureate education is required. An advanced degree is a plus. Essentsat skills and experience include strong leadership, planning,. I prioritization and management experience in i complex environments, effective senior team IIII building, the ability to communicate effectively, and financial expertise. The candidate must be able to understand and manage diverse constituency groups, including community members and Town employees and needs to function successfully in an environment that emphasizes performance, collaborative problem solving, cooperation and respect for others. I Salary D.O.Q. plus a full range of benefits including housing and a car. Please i,...,,4, d your resume wfth references by 31 May 1993 to: Carmen Slagle, Personnel Department, Town of Vail, 75 S. Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado i 81657. The Town of Vail is an Equal ~ Opportunity Employer. !-~C'~~c~~ ~o~ -~/Z ~ 013 a f "'OWN ~VIANAGER -Y.il, C~lor~ado v.+.. ra.e n* tio:.a:ile..aera..Z75,ooo.ira.~~~Aedn~~ictdlaee m fis7ti..awrn~tw0ndpadm .r .llh.Odleo.raero..t iit~..:er ~wt.wa. lfe 7b~n r ~o: ateaue ffba Oame+l T , b is wpiriaa~ d a loan dlele~ frt a wiY S+ ~aiu d balit an i..., ioir~ bnsd,".,J~~' a,', 1,~ j pefea6~ b a ~xt to _ yin ! die Y n pYe ti~eoed fo1~ al~d . iYlio a~.~.; a+dL~odel k'Ife~3Ydre a~ le die eo waeneeod aeeaR dheee drape, ~ ~ Tow , and needi m 1oa i . A~~ `anRu IYt~ ~wa~t !er elrsa ~f ~ pir allld DAA• 1 1 loin ud a t4we Saar naanac ~ , 7~1~~1 giha~ !0!4 Vr1, D , Tnw d Vd17s S EI65?.1tie Tam d VaY it m B~od G , , . 3 , x~ , a a a a a a 0 as 1993 o a a - a a a a a, ~ ~a i a a ~v a c a a a VAIL & BEAVER CREEK ~ ~ 1 "'ti ; : March 31, 1993 Presented by CJUoM~U Hosted by Jerry Ford Mayor Peggy OSterfoss Rolex Legends of Skiing Visa Ford Cup Town of Vail March 10-14, 1993 75 S. Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Dear Peggy: Board of Directors President Gerald R. Ford Robert E. Barrett Thanks to the tremendous support of sponsors such as the Leon D. Black Carolyn S. Blount Town of Vail, this year's American Ski Classic was a great success. It Craig M. Cogut would not be ossible to roduce a first-rate event without the James Berry Craddock p p Jack Crosby involvement of our sponsors and we are truly grateful to the Town of Andrew P. Daly H. Benjamin Duke, Jr. Vail for their ongoing support of our projects. Harry H. Frampton, III John Gamsey George N. Gillett, Jr. We look forward to the continued involvement and support of Pepi Gramshammer our events by the Town of Vail. Steve N. Haber Martha Head William J. Hybl Elaine W. Kelton Sincerely, Henry R. Kravis Fitzhugh Scott, Emerinu ~ Michael S. Shannon Rodney E. Slifer C. Philip Smiley Richard L. Swig CeCllla FOlZ Oscar L. Tang Herbert A. Wertheim Project Director . John Garnsey President SA UAILVALLEY FOUNDATION A Project of the Vail Valley Foundation Post Office Box 309 Vail, Colorado 81658 303-476.9500 FAX 303.476.7320 ® ,8~a Candidate for the 1999 World Alpine Ski Championships x~. ~ - ice. AIRPORT DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SITE TOURS ~ 261'$9$2 - 1'~.•~ H•n hl hM.Jl llalll//u W5 ~ ~3 • I (1{ {N ~ ~ l~) i ~ , I ` 1 '~A ` f ~~~,1`')1 ~ I~w lOUlsvll I Ems, • 1! i IJ' jy ~ '~,yy~11AFAYE RE tl „rw~ BnIGItTON ' ~ you want to check your own driving Ume to the new airport, first determine ti?e ~ ~ quickest way to reach Pena Boulevard. For Bnoo ~E filEl ~ most metro residents, that means the ~ quickest way to 1-70 and Chambers Road. , ' ' For those north or East 88th Avenue, :1:1~ 1 . r " ' ~ ,j. especially those east of 1-25, it s generally ~ - • ~ (aster to go east on 104th Avenue to Tower err ~ ~ i~~' Roud, lhon soutii to the Poi?a Boulevard j entrance at East 78th Avent/e. w ~ Frorrl your starting point, t~ecord the time and odometer reading as you leave and again • when you reach either the Tower Road or 1' ' N 1-70/Chambers ramps. From 1-70, it's 12.2 mllea trtore to UMted Alrilnes° curbsWa " baggage check at the new airport. K you 1 Inalnlain 55 mph, h tlvoukt take 14 n?Intdas 1 to get t7lere. From the Tower Road on-ramp, , VIljJ~4E ' It's an addilkxlal 6.7 miles to the terminal - alwut B mintttes. Add those to your readings ~ • . . If you came down Tower Instead. • these are the dnvulg times and drslanl:es to Oenver Interrlallalal AYnort Iran locauons e4ose Ctly lterrtlyl?W/l feeN ilrM MIN• olelropoUlan Ik:nver as reecxdod by Iiw Rocky A/own(aiM News under vwlous road eorWlllons dunng the Iwsl ?wo weeks, I,x:kWing any alterr,aUVe ra,les lakan 4111,e s,rvey: Evergreen 11l Colo. i4 ? Beer Creek noel 1 70 89:05 51.9 City Slariblg Hatr,l tteete TYee Miters Genesee 17. Csnljjd! L Fldge Wey (-70 17:21 43.4 AppWwrxxl I. Wes132rW Avn. 6 YamgM:W 51. I-70 35:13 3i.7 Golden 13U1 1M,g1onSl. 1 10 10:19 36 2 Mal,ahl,e Luunly E. Mapallrw nrx?d 6 S. l'eo11a S1. 1 25/226 36:21 30 8 GreenwoorlVWegp E.Orctrrd ttrad i Ik,Yy St. 118/226 33:11 20 0 1. E. Ury Cruuk NorW 6 S (lrllverully 1 26/226 10:46 31.1 Illglllatda fierwlt ~ Illyllerxte Ilorw:ltlla:. (:order 0/70/225 43.3:! 38 9 Alv,,lla 4. west u4w Ave. d ward nclwl t 70 311:44 37.7 (trruyetle ~ BweMrw hued 6 fLWlc Rued Colo. 7 13.03 35 2 s. nalshxl noad 11 Olde woclswam 170 34:35 28.8 IQIth 45:59 35.3 Musa Smoky I kU 6 S. BucMlay Road 1225 32:22 25.9 1-70 43:4 I 40.2 , J.E.1110 Avn. arW 5. a,ckley noad 1-225 28:18 21.2 lekewood 32. West 4th Ave. 6 Unbn Blvd. 8f25/70 38:54 33.0 1. E. Alameda 8 S. Chamber fluact 1-225 21:53 [ 8.8 >i1.6. W{>Mng Pkwy. 4 W. IL'weM Ave. 8/25n0 42:10 34.8 !.East 6th Ave. & Peoria St. 1225 21:37 18.0 31. S. Wodewatl?Blvd. 6 W. Alwrlede 8/25/70 37:32 31.2 lielgen Palk !0. Colo. 74 & leG. 65 E70 52:22 17.0 lltlkrlon >t!. hAe4? 51. d Soullt HUtoe St. 85/25/70 43: 14 34.7 Ua,Wer 11.28th St. 6 Canyat thud. Cob. 7 58:26 44.2 longnwrll Mnin Sl. dl Thkd Ave. Cob. 7 51:07 47.2 104th 50:16 40.5 104th 53:22 47.9 1-70 49:58 45.4 1-70 55:47 54.2 Wlghtun 12.4ih Ave. d &klge SL Tower 24:52 20.2 loulsvWe 1I. Mdn SL 6 PY,e St. Colo. 7 49:25 39.2 linwnllield 17. US 287 8 MWway Blvd. 104th 38:25 29.4 104th 46:29 35.7 1-70 36:07 34.8 170 45:41 40 6 Cherry I htls Village 11. E.Qellevlew Ave. & S.Unlvershy 1-25/225 34:44 29.5 Manson >a. Morrison Road 6 Slaw St. h 70 47:19 40 8 fununerce Cny 15. Parkway tklve 6 Oafdla St. 1270/70 23:18 20.5 Northgienn S!. West 104th Ave. 6 Ftlxtxt SI. 104th 28:51 22 4 Oenvcr 1 i. W. Colfae Ave. b B:ru,oclc St. 1.25/70 31:57 25.6 1 70 32:16 28.7 , 17.Wesl38thAve.dfederalBlvrl. 1-TO 29:18 26.1 Parker 40.Co1o836MdnSt. 1225 38:27 32.8 1 11. W Mlssissipp S S. feaerul eMd. Bj25/70 36:56 29.1 South Je11CO 41. W.t3eUevk,w Avn. d S Sknms St. 285/85/'15/70 51:29 40.9 1!. W. Danmoulh Ave. d S. Lamm SI. 285/85/25/70 45:27 36.3 G470/70 53:15 45.0 20. E. tlalllxlen Ave. IL S. T amarac: 1225 30:?O 26.2 42. S. Wadsworth 6 W. tlowles Ave. 285/85/25/70 48.34 39 4 21. leetsdaW A. E. Mlsslsslllpl Ava. 1-225 28:17 22 2 0470/225 54.38 48 0 22. Eau tsl Ave. d UnNe1s11y ONd P70 36;58 24.7 17. W. Chatlleld Ava. 6 S. Hlpling 0470/225 51:21 46.3 23. Cokxado Blvd. 6 Ma,lvk:w tNvd. 1-70 25:18 21.7 Thanlon 44. Eest 1 12th Ave. 6 CokxadoBlvd. IO411t 26:35 20 4 t 2{.East 48th Ave. b Iinnalava nuad Pena IllvQ, 15:14 1 1.7 Weslminster IS. Wes1118th Avn. b Wudswonh t 70 34:65 30 5 ~ r nip/:wolnl 25. Broadway b Hampol:n Avc. 85/25/70 40:48 32.8 4{. West 72nd Ave, d S?wrklon Blvd. 1 TO 35:07 28 6 625/225 36.47 30,7 WhealRldge 47.Wes1441hAve.&WuUswath ITO 31:02 27.8 ~ 1 <<:~ ttls~ k..~. 12o ul AvE. L______ ( i 1.-- . ~ DENVER 'o ~ " IIJIERNAiIONAL i ~ I ! AIRPORT W Iloa ul Avt i w 1 ~ • ~ tltl 111 AVI ( I<UChY MOUNIAiN AF«ENAL i ~ _ WII ULIfE RLFUGf. ~ - t..-~~. _ . ~s~.~ . ~Y w- ~ ~ _ .f PENH BLVD. ~ ~ a = a L-.=..-------•-------------- ~ = t ' i i M'1: ~ I I Ll a ( I I~ I I ~ 'x. 56 111 AVE. 1 i VOUR I ~ PICKUP + ( _ , LOCATION ~ ~ ~ y _ I 1 ~ Isw(,1,:1..~, I Mnl:lill Illll 11 11 hlt7c. 111 Vll Intl Aii p.Kl ~l_ - , j'- ~y / 22S ~o ~5 U 1 ITV N Dc:nvcr SCALE =)51)OO.Ox' METRO VICINITY MAP . page 2 15000' 7500' U 15000' I' Ill I/lun (~nllull~llunhlN . ,t ~c,,, 1 ~ ~ ' ~~~s~ ~ ~ j~~~~~ ICS ~ tt ,1 ~ t .C~ ~ I T ~ ~ ~ , y ~ ~ ~ , ~ i ~ ~I ~G_~, ~ ~ ~ X41` X ~ ~ r ~ y ~ C ~ ~ ar+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ T t~ \ 1 X 1 1~ tE ~ ~ pRAw~Na 3p~0 aaa• :oa ` ~1 ~ 100' 2~a' ~ .y, ~on~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 1-_r Gi~til~ 1 ~ i r" ~ r~ ~ 1 ` ~1 t a1RCRpG'~ *AX1t?N E _ ~ ' yl~ J ` ~ ,al' ~ V ~\.il IINLLL` J ~ w~/~ 'I CCNCOlJRSc C 1 ~1 =~r-====.~____~~_-_- I ~ "AA CONTROL. TC~wEz E i CONC4E~RS~ 8 it i '.JNII't~` ' -~__===-cif '=i r===~~______________-~~ - 'L-- ~ ~---%L-- - JL-= i~~ - JL----=--------= t 1 rGTS TUNNEL. ~ I) CONCO`:~RSE A ' - (INTERN~ IfC-~lAI_------------------~ ~ CCM;TNENTAL) =`-i - - - ADMINISTRATfON E~ BUILDING _ ` ~ cR~cC~ / '31T1 AVl. ~ a<1y IVF. _ ~ \ ~ T~ + 1 t, ~ ~ i ?ARK[NG _ c ~~pARK`;G GARAGE ` _ ~ "GARAGE J 1~1 I 1 Y un~ ~v[. j ~ II 1 TERMINALS ~ ~ `U i ~ > 4 O 1 1 / ~ Z ~l..nLE ! ~ _ ~ ~CQ.CQ~ ~~0~ 7~0~ p_~r_plon_tourCUiaemco i i. f . ~ r~ t 12U Its RVk I I ' 12U lh RVE i 1 . I l t I E ~ FUF.I. FARM L. i o / r ~ v IL AIRLINE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES i ~ _ _ o - - I- 7 a ~ eu~ ~~r-ti~~_~ 1 d' ~ w' ~ a } 56 lh AVE I 96 th RYk 17l ~ t & l I7N~ I C]0 ~ - ~ - / ~ / ~ LL J~k I 1 t 1~ t 1 I JoG t r ~ ~ 1 f _ _ _ _ ..1 1 1\ ~E~ 1~ IL 7l ~-7- 7~ ' ~Y~ ` S0. AIR CARGO AREA ,SN~ f_..~.,.~.~ i / ~ I ~ I N t ~ G / t , M. t' 1 i ' ~ ; ~ _ ' '0^"" ~ i SCALE 1" f3000.0U' - S page 5 sooo' 4000' 0 1300 ® ~ e l M DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT J ' _ ~ - ~-a~ ` ~ i~ f (1 REVISED: U9/ 1 1/92 I DATE; t U/9U I DENVER I NTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VOL. I X10.1 T E ~ '•~~..illll+~i _ it - _ _ _ S --'v ` ~a _ - Y _ i r - ~F ~ - - T~14{IIVAL: TERMINAL AND CONCOURSE TOTAL: '.43?.CiO SF 6,463.610 SF 166°6 CONCESSION SPACE 91211 SF ? 16.486 SF 131°'0 GATES: 108 a4 I_=ao1 G:~TE SIZE: SM - ~tED 'viED • La.RGE .afRCR.aFT DOCKING ARE1: 1:.'3? llN. FT IS.ooJ LIN. FT. .,IRFIELD AREA; SQ. StILES SQ. JtILES ri;'~ a1.ti~C',,`;~: liL!)SR I:.:CC' I . •.Sn . 1:...~L I1N~)i t1.. ~ti~ ~ Y. 1:)~ ~ L Iti7'c.R.\:~TiCN.~L cau^_eR ~.a:J' ~ ._.:CC' I OPEN 1996 lace ~ I:..:~ TAXIU'.4Y DEiT.i J.;.. ~.:;1' w -ter?,L L1 ir;aY LL1G i r,. ;4.;'_. cJ.~~~" l J~:~ :NOWSTOR.1t L.~,`lDING CAPACITF: ? ~ OR LESS K 99 AIRCR<~FT,~HR. coop t`y'EATHER L~NDt\G cAPacIT:: 99 AIRCR~FTIHR. ~ ~r l 14TH & STOUT 24.1 MILES • 32:33 MIN. [•Z?SII•ZS INTERCHANGE 36.1 MILES • 30:14 f•;0 & 6TH AVENUE WEST 33.9 MILES • 39:L? . C-4"!0 & WADSWORTH 4Z.b MILES • ~;:=a BROOMFIELD (BOULDER TLRNPIKE) 31.1 MILES • 39:•+~ AIRPORT MARi~H.YG /PUBLIC AFFAIRS (30?) ?70-1350 F':.. l.,ently Asked Questions and Answers 1. What about the terminal roof? Why was it chosen? Will it withstand had, snow or ~...,ng winds? The C.W. Fentress/J.H. Bradburn architectural firm and the new airport's Project Management team chose a tefion-coated fiberglass roof over a more conventional roof because of its durability, ease of maintenance and cost- effectiveness. The designers hope the terminal building will be a very dramatic architectural statement--a design that people will remember and immediately associate with Denver and the West. Teflon-coated fiberglass roofs cover structures in various climates all over the world (Vancouver's Canada Harbour Place and Saudi Arabia's King Fahd International Stadium to name just two?, in some locations for as long as 20 years. Before the contractor installs the roof, it will undergo numerous strength tests. Denver International Airport`s roof will be able to withstand winds of up to 200 miles per hour and will have a tensile strength of 500 pounds per square inch. Designers expect this roof to withstand hail as well or better than a conventional roof. 2. Are there plans for light rod or other alternative transpo.:~:;on to Denver Intemationai Airport? The new airport design engineers planned DIA so that a rail line from downtown Denver could be accommodated. City and RTD officials are studying whether existing Union Pacific lines that head east along 1-70 can be used. This route would need a spur from existing lines north, then east to the new airport. If the federal government will donate land from usable areas of the Rocicy Mountain Arsenal for the spur, then project costs might be significantly lower than building a light rail system. Current plans for such a rail line are in the exploratory stage. 3. What wdl preverrt neighborhoods from buddiing dose to the new airport and crea.:..g the same noise problem that surrounds Stapleton? The intergovernmental agreement between Denver and Adams County stipulates that no residences will be built within five miles of any runway end and no residences within two-to-#ive miles of the airport boundary, for a potential total of five-to-seven miles from the end of a runway. 4. What wdl happen to the power lines that run through the new airport property? The lines have been moved to temporary poles. By opening day in October,. 1993, the lines will be completely off airport property and will run north to south along aright-of-way some distance east of DIA. I` 5. ~ What is Gateway? Gateway will be Denver's newest community, developed from 4,500 acres of .farm land. The City of Denver's Gateway/Stapleton Development Office, in conjunction with the Denver Planning Office, is planning and rezoning the area. Denver envisions the area as a dramatic entryway into the City and State the first community that visitors see as new arrivals from DIA. Gateway will be rezoned to include high quality commercial, industrial and residential development, while at the same time, providing parks, trails and other public amenities. The project is intended to compliment and invigorate the adjacent Montbello and Green Valley Ranch neighborhoods, as well as enhance the new airport. 6. Isn't there a greater risk of tornado and microburst activity at the new airport? Meteorological studies of the new airport site conclude that tornado and severe weather risks are not greater than at Stapleton. A committee for the Air Line Pilots Association reviewed data from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and concluded that the new airport site could be safer than Stapleton, because of Denver International's more widely spaced runways. And its distance from the mountains means more maneuverability for pilots during thunderstorms. The FAA will equip the new airport with a Low Level Wind Shear Alert System and Doppler radar to monitor microburst tornado activity. 7. Is there a problem with expansive sons at the new airport? Experts conducted extensive geotechnical field and laboratory work on new airport site soils before construction began. The swell potential of the general soil types (weathered claystone bedrock, weathered siitstone bedrock and weathered sandstone bedrock) is minimal. No solid areas of bentonite clay exist. 8. What are the most recent passenger numbers for Stapleton? : Stapleton had 28 million passengers in 199'! an increase of 3.4 percent over 1990. Stapleton was one of three airports in last year's top ten that showed an increase in passenger traffic. A 1991 FAA study forecasts 35.3 million passengers for Denver in 1995 (with two hubbing airlines). To date, this year, Stapleton has experienced an eight percent increase in passenger traffic. 9. How wil large snowfalls impact the new airport and Airport Boulevard? Airport operations will increase the number of snow removal vehicles (currently 65) to compensate for the increased runway/taxiway area at the new airport. DIA also will be responsible for keeping Airport Boulevard open, even during the most adverse weather conditions. FACT SHEET ELREY JEPPESEN TERMINAL Denver International Airport's terminal building is named for businessman and aviation pioneer Elrey Jeppesen, whose "Jep" navigational maps and charts are standard equipment in every commercial airline cockpit around O~ the world. DIA planners have made traffic flow and convenience the primary design objectives for the terminal to make it efficient for both connecting and origination-and-destination passengers. DENVER INTERNATIONAL Outbound passengers will drive either to the terminal's east or west side, i I R P O R T- depending on which airline they are using. Pena Boulevard, the roadway into and out of the terminal, will divide--not only to the west and east-- but also into three levels on each side of the building for greater convenience and less traffic congestion. The upper level is for departing travelers, where passengers can check their baggage or reach airline ticket caunters inside. Immediately below is the roadway for commercial vehicles such as taxis, hotel vans, ski shuttles and RTD buses. The third level down is for passenger pickup. Flanking the terminal on both sides are covered garages with approximately 12,000 public parking spaces, plus 3,000 spaces for rental cars on the lower levels. Locating rental cars within walking distance of the terminal eliminates shuttles (and up to 40 percent of airport traffic and resulting pollution). The Jeppesen Terminal ~ has approximately 1.4 million square feet of space, including a central atrium that is walled by glass and covered by a translucent teflon-coated fiberglass roof. The roof has an inner liner to absorb sound that often echoes throughout large open spaces. The liner also creates an insulating dead-air space. Soft, shadowiess natural light will illuminate the atrium during the day. At night, illuminated from within, the roof will be a spectacular beacon that is expected to become Denver`s architectural signature. When visibility permits, travelers will have a breathtaking view of the Rocky Mountains through the massive glass wall to the south. Fountains, sculpture and other public art will highlight interior space. There is more than 216,000 square feet of concessions space in the terminal, and the atrium will be surrounded by a variety of shops, restaurants and airport services. Emphasis will be on quality at a reasonable cost. airport °ublic Attain av~anon Division To travel to airline gates, passengers and their friends or families will City and Couna or Denver Stapleton Terminal Bwld~ng pass through a central terminal security area and descend to the Zoom 3199 Automated Guideway Transit System`s station platform. There, they will Denver. Colorado 80_07 X031 ~7o.l:so board an underground train for the quick, quiet ride to DIA's concourses. FAX: 0031170-I?66 2921 ':.r _ 'rVEIIINGTON E. WEBS vsavor FACT SHBBT SUBWAY SYSTEM Passengers using Denver International Airport on opening day and into the 21st century will shuttle between the landside terminal and airside concourses aboard a world-class people-mover system. Designed and built by AEG Westinghouse, the Automated Guideway Transit System 1AGTS) wilt be a safe and efficient way of moving the DENVER high volume of passengers that will use the new airport. The INTERNATIONAL underground trains are quiet and pollution-free. AIRPORT' The fuNy automated rail system consists of two parallel guideway tunnels that run north and south through the center of the terminal and the concourses. The cars, each able to hold 100 passengers, run on rubber tires and follow a center guide beam that carries an electric current to power the cars` motors. Each train car is fully accessible to disabled vaveiers, with a designated space for a wheelchair. There are else two seats at each end of the car. Two-car trains will leave the terminal about every two minutes and travel to stations in each concourse core. The round trip from terminal to Concourse C, the most distant, and back takes less than 10 minutes. At peak times, the system will be running with five trains, carrying approximately 6,000 passengers per hour each direction. Track crossovers are located between the terminal and Concourse A, between Concourses A and B and between B and C. These crossovers provide additional reliability to the system so that breakdowns will not impede normal traffic flow. A "fiot" standby train is always ready as part of operating procedure. An Automatic Train Control fATC) system, using the latest computer • technology, will coordinate al! AGTS functions and will be located in the Airport Office Building. Operators will oversee the ATC using large- screen, high-resolution color monitors and touch-screen convoi consoles. 2921 A~rDOR Public Affatn Avuuon Oivivon C ~tv ana Counnr of Oenve+ Staoteton 7ermrnal Budding Room P99 Oenve,. COlOradO 80207 7031J'0.1:50 FAX:~3031270.1266 ~`a WELUNGION E. WEBS NiVO, • FACT SHF.=T COMPUT'cR RYSTEUlS Denver International Airport is the first airport in the world to be totally designed, built and operated using computers. DIA planners cite efficiency and convenience as two main reasons for the extensive use of computers at the new airport. Computers allowed DIA's facility-management system to manage the project's development, construction and operation by the scheduled opening in October 1993. Planners used computers early in the DENVER design phase to analyze different aspects of DIA operations. To make lNTERNATIONA~ runway-taxiway configuration as efficient and economical as possible, A I R Pd RT' computer models were used to analyze taxiing distances, fue! consumption rates and arrival and departt:re patterns. Computer models also helped planners study wind and weather patterns to determine the mast efficient airfield c~nnguration. Computers were indispensable in keeping track of ail the contracts, consvuction companies, drawings, blueprints and other documents involved. The state-of-the-art CAD (computer-aided design) and CAFiV1 (computer-aided facility management) systems selected by planners gave them a way to gather design information, track construction operations and manage administration, maintenance and personnel. The systems allow engineers and planners to feed ail graphic information into the computer and then isolate any section of any structure they choose. Other computer systems that are being used at Stapleton International Airport will be improved and utilized at Denver International. Computers will be linked with fiber-optic cameras to keep all areas of the airport under constant surveillance. The computers also will be connected to a Doppler radar system that provides athree-dimensional picture of focal weather patterns, both horizontally and vertically. Information on safety techniques and emergency operations will be stored on computers to aid airport personnel in their job performance. At D1A, computers also will be used to implement preventive maintenance schedules and administer concessionaires' leases. Airoortf~vblicAffavs The City's multimillion-dollar investment in the CAD/CAFiVI system will Avunon Division CitYandCountvoi0enver ultimately be repaid many times over through lower operating costs at Stapleton Term~nai Building Denver International. Room 3199 Denver. Colorado 80207 0031270.1250 fAX:1303)270•i266 •`~r? WEIUNGTON E. WE88 tiavor FACT SHEET FAA CONTROL TOWER The Federal Aviation Administration control tower at Denver International Airport is different in several ways. Designed by Leo A. Daly, it is a prototype for the FAA's newest control-tower design. Q~ The 327-foot tower is the tallest FAA svucture in North America. Its 33 stories give air traffic controllers an unobstructed three-mile view of all aircraft activity at DIA. DENVER INTERNATIONAL General Contractor M.A. Mortenson Co.'s Federal Contracting Group AIRPORT- began building the tower in May 1991 and finished in November 1992. Installation and fine-tuning of the sophisticated radar equipment began in November and will continue until opening. The first 240 feet of the tower's walls are built of precast structural concrete 20 inches thick, reinforced with #14 rebar. Each 12-by-11- foot pane! weighs 16 tons. The final 87 feet of the tower consist of the mushroom-shaped top, built of structural steel, and the cab. The special distortion-free glass in the cab windows is 1.5 inches thick (two half-inch sheets with ahalf-inch air space between). The 850- square-#oot tower at D1A ties with Detroit's as the FAA's largest. A dozen controllers will work in the tower to direct air traffic at what is expected to be one of the world's busiest airports. An exterior walkway around the tower cab provides access for maintenance, as well as a bird's-eye view of the airport complex. Corner balconies will house microwave equipment to provide a 360- degree transmitting capability. A penthouse perched atop the cab holds air-surface detection radar equipment. The area below the cab contains mechanical and communications equipment, administrative and personnel-support offices and arable-access level. At the bottom, the tower foundation extends 45 feet below ground and rests on a nine-foot pile cap. The cap is supported by 34 caissons that extend another 38 to 40 feet underground, making the entire foundation about 94 feet deep. A~roortP„blic~ffau: This intricate design and construction resulted not only in the tallest Aviation Division CitvandCauntvoi0enver FAA tower ever built, but one of the strongest and safest. The tower StaoietonTerminalBwlding is engineered to sway only one-half inch in an 86-mile-per-hour wind. Room )199 Denver Colorado 80207 ;Jmt2:o-t2so Five-thousand tons of concrete and 650 tons of steel went into the PAX:U0J1270-1266 gg,5 million structure. Located on the south side of Concourse C, the FAA control tower will play an important role in DIA`s goal of being the most efficient and most modern airport in the world. wfuwezor+ E. weal Havr FACT SHEET RUNWAYS Denver International Airport (DIA> has astate-af-the-art airfield design that places runways in every quadrant of the site. The runways, arranged in a pinwheel fashion, radiate from the central terminallconcourseorea. This configuration allows air controllers to shift traffic quickly from one runway to another, depending on the wind direction, with minimal delays or disruption of air traffic. Under optimum DENVER conditions, the airfield design allows a "flow-through" traffic pattern in INTERNATIONAL which aircraft land, taxi to concourse gates, and take off in one AIRPORT- direction. Safety is also an important part of DIA's airfield design. No runway crosses another, minimizing the chance of aircraft traffic jams or collisions. Aground radar system wilt give air traffic controllers the exact location of a{{ taxiing aircraft and other ground vehicles at ail times. An innovative runway/taxiway lighting system--with lights imbedded in the concrete to form centerlines and stopbars at intersections--is another safety feature to guide taxiing aircraft in times of low visibility. All paired parallel runways are at least 4,300 feet apart, the minimum required by the Federal Aviation Administration for simultaneous landings in instrument flight conditions (bad weather). Three streams of aircraft will be able to land at DIA in such conditions, reducing system delays that currently plague Stapleton. . Three north/south and two east/west runways will be operational when DIA opens in October 1993. Each is 12,000 feet (3,658 meters) long, 150 (46 meters) wide. Runways are built in layers, beginning with six feet of compacted, non- expansive soli. Then there is a rototilled 12-inch Payer of soil that is treated with lime to form a subgrade. Eight inches of acement-treated base goes on top of the soil, followed by~ 17 inches of concrete. Approximately 240,000 cubic yards of concrete will be used to pave DtA's runways and taxiways. The runways will be about twice as thick as an average road and four times wider. .4irDprt Public Airairs To accommodate international flights with long-range, wide-body av~anon Oiv~ston citvandcountvoioenver aircraft, DIA wilt have a 16,000-#oot (4,800-meter) runway that will be Stapleton Termrnai Building finished within a yeas of the new airport's opening. Room St99 Denver, Colorado d020T 303t_'0-t 350 FAX:.3031 2T0-1:66 ;j. WELLINGTON E. WEBS rnavor • FACT SHEET DEICING PROCEDl1RES At Denver International Airport, the airlines will have the safest and most efficient facilities available for deicing aircraft before takeoff during times of snow or frozen rain. Three centralized deicing pads, located at the end of each concourse just off the west apron perimeter taxiway, will accommodate as many as five DENVER or six aircraft each. These pads will allow efficient application of deicing INTERNATIONAL fluids, but will also control contaminated runoff. Airline workers will AIRPORT- spray ethylene glycol (a deicing chemical) or propylene glycol (an anti- . icing chemical) onto aircraft from pad booms ar mobile trucks. Because the pads are located close to North/South Runway 16/34, aircraft will not have to queue after deicing, reducing potential for ice to reform. Planes can proceed to takeoff shortly after leaving the pad. Centralizing the process increases efficiency, and locating the pads close to runways maximizes safety. Disposing of the runoff in an environmentally safe manner also is a prime airfield consideration. When the aircraft use these cenvai deicing areas, the used fluids can be collected and piped into storage tanks for future recycling. Each pad will have a storage tank that can hold 500,000 gallons of liquid. Dirty water from the concourse apron area is funneled into two detention ponds where, mixed with sunlight and air, it will evaporate or break down chemically. This less-concentrated runoff can be piped to the Metropolitan Sewage Disposal District for treatment. Deicing at Denver International is designed to be efficient, kind to the environment and, above all, an effective preventative safety procedure. 2921 4~rnort Public ••~rfaus >viatwn Oivis~on Gtv and Counro or Denver Staoteton Terminal Bwiding Room 1144 Denver. Colorado do:07 303t _'O~t?$J F.~X 103t?70-t:bb :7. , • weutNeror+ E. were ~nawr FACT SHEET AUTOMATED BAGGAGE SYSTEM Moving baggage efficiently is a major goal of Denver International Airport (DIA), whose planners have designed a complex automated baggage system. For passengers using the new airport, packing will be the worst part of traveling with luggage. A bag's journey at DIA begins at curbside check-in at the terminal, where airline agents will attach coded tags to luggage. United Airlines will have DENVER "flow-through" ticket counters, where an agent will first check the bags INTERNATIONAL and then enter data that tells the baggage system computer what flight ~ I R P O R T" the bags are taking. As the suitcase, garment bag or other standard piece of baggage heads along a conveyor, it is met by a camputer- controlled, automated car, or Destination Coded Vehicle tDCV), which receives a piece of luggage on the fly. Linear induction motors power the OCVs, which run along a track and automatically position themselves to accept, carry and discharge their contents. Outbound cars will move to the concourses in underground tunnels, where they can accelerate to a speed of nearly 19 miles per hour. Sensors provide spot checking, so controllers will always know the location of any DCV within the airport complex. United baggage will arrive at Concourse S on DCVs and will automatically unload onto conveyors that proceed along the apron level to off-loading carousels. There, United workers will put baggage into containers or onto carts for the short journey to the plane. United passengers with odd-sized baggage such as skis will check them separately, Baggage-handlers will load skis into tubs, which will automatically move onto atwo-car chassis in the baggage system. The double DCV with its ski cargo will move from the terminal to the Concourse B apron level, where it will be manually unloaded. • Baggage going to Concourses A (Continental) and C (all other airlines) • initially moves along a conveyor, past a scanner that electronically transmits destination information (from the coded tag) to a DCV. Receiving its traveling instructions, the efficient DCV knows exactly where to take its cargo. At Concourse A, the cars will unload at a •1,r~pr[Puoltc •airatrs basement sorting pier. At C, they will travel to off-loading carousels on a.~auonoiv~ston the concourse apron level. Handlers will transfer bags from the t~ ana Countv of Denver automated system to traditional tugs and carts. From terminal check-in aaaieron Terminal Budding doom 1199 to Concourse C off-loading, a piece of luggage will be en route of^..er co~oraaoao2oT approximately 8 1 /2 minutes. JOJj2'0•t25J Fat. JOIt 2'0.1:66 Skis and other odd-sized baggage going to Concourses A and C begin with a ride on a conveyor belt. Handlers then place skis, etc., into tubs, ~.VEIttHGTO^t E. WEBS v1aWr and a belt conveys the tubs to double-chassis DCVs for the journey to the concourses. There, the tubs are manually unloaded. Inbound baggage luggage unloaded from aircraft will trove! to - terminal carousels via the automated system. Again, there are variations among carriers. United inbound bags will start on telescopic conveyor belts that connect aircraft with concourse gates. Handlers will unload transfer bags first. As the bags move into Concourse B, automatic scanners will read their tags and DCVs will take the bags to the next DENVER gate for a connecting flight. Denver destination luggage moves by INTERNATIONAL conveyor from the plane into the concourse, then to the DCVs far the AIRPORT- trip to a terminal carousel. Baggage from aircraft arriving at Concourses A and C gates will be unloaded in traditional ways and taken to the concourse apron level before being introduced into the automated system. Skis and oversized luggage will be manually loaded into tubs, which will be placed onto DCVs. Handlers at terminal carousels will unload skis and place them onto a revolving, vertical claim rack. - During peak passenger movement, DIA's baggage system may have all of its 4,000 DCVs operating at once. The cars can move approximately 34,000 pieces of baggage per hour. Although the system will be the most complex in North America, passengers should like the convenience of curbside check-in and 24 odd-size check-in points on two levels. After returning home, they will be pleasantly surprised to find their baggage waiting for them at the terminal. The system will employ the following (all are approximations): 90,000 feet of DCV track 30,000 feet of conveyors 19,000 bearings 4, 600 synchronous drives 3,000 conveyor drives 2,750 photo cells 2,100 linear induction motors 1,300 conveyor power turns ~~roortPubhc~irav5 350 motor control panels >~~ahon Division 300 radio frequency readers city and county of oe++ver ~ 12 programmable logic controllers Stapleton Terminal Bwldtng Zoom fl99 75 manual encoding consoles Denver. Caorado 80:07 101 :'O~tS0 f.1X ~J03t."0-t:66 WQ~UNGTON E. WEBH ~tavor a a ~ ~ . ~ V r it 4 v: 1/ ~ } ! _ _ . , s ~ a Yap) ~y: - ~:r ~ ,r ^ , ' " ^ ~ yt„v';.'~y„~rii~"1Ysrad~°"~"'"" t ~z ~aMy, ""ys2f~ 9l1V4~ '°a'~¢#s?It '~cc` _ ~ ~ r `"4.p1yf?yk uax Yr h K ~ ~ e.-~ ~n.aza !M''"~ 4-~"" vx ~ ~ ~ _ _ ill , ~ wr0 o a , ~n~ v ~ ~ +~M~~ .~~ny'~r~, ~~W t r tv' Yom.- ~4+r~-~ ` „ ~ G R _ i ~ ~ ~ y ~a Y: ~.Sr; i~:7, 1 X d~: J APR _ NORTHWEST COLORADO 21993 - ~V V~C~~ COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT S Post Office Box 2308 .Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 303 468-0295 FAX 303 466-1208 MINUTES,' NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ELEVATOR INSPECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARCH 23, 1993 PRESENT: Jerry Wooldridge, Summit County Jerry Booth, Town of Breckenridge Mark Manchus, Town of Winter Park Jim Wray, Grand County . Gary Murrain, Town of Vail Dick Younkin, Denver Regional Council of Governments Billy Hulse, NWCCOG Linda Venturani, NWCCOG - Linda Boucher, NWCCOG ~ ~ , Program Update Billy Hulse gave a report on the status of the inspection program. To date agreements have been signed with Steamboat Springs, Pitkin County, Kremmling, Jackson County, Winter Park, and Summit County. Billy has inspected 75-80 elevators and has found many problems. Billy has taken the approach of giving the building owners time to get problems taken care of before • becoming heavy handed. Billy is working closely with Dover to get the units up to standards. Billy reported that he has had one building owner deny him access. He will send a letter to the owner and will work with Jerry Wooldridge on this one. The group recommended a court order. if necessary. • The group asked Billy how he was informing owners of the program. Billy explained that he is going to the owners and property managers in'person to introduce the program before - starting inspections. Some of the advisory committee members offered to send letters out in their areas and also suggested getting the word out through hotel and resort associations. Dick Younkin suggested having business cards printed for Billy in each jurisdiction to give'him more authority as he is actually acting as a special inspector for the local jurisdiction. . Code Adoption ' There was some question on how the~code~should be adopted and Jerry Wooldridge handed out a sample Resolution/Ordinance for the towns and counties to use. (See attached). . Eagle County: Avon, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minturn, Red Cliff, Vail, ' brand County: Fraser, Granby, Grand Lake, Hot Sulphur Springs, Kremmiing, Winter Park, ` Jvckson County: Walden, ` Pitkin County: Aspen, Snowmass Village, ' Routt County: Hayden, Oak Creek, Steamboat Springs, Yampa, ' Summit Gounty; Blue Rivar, Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Montezuma, .Silverthorne 1 Re-Inspections ~ ~ Discussion was held regarding how to handle the expense if multiple inspections become necessary for a particular unit. The local jurisdictions have a fee in place for re-inspections and felt that this could be imposed in such cases. This issue will be discussed at future advisory committee meetings. No policy recommendation was made at this time. West Slope Building Officials Meeting There is a meeting o-f the West Slope Building Officials on Friday, March 26 and the members present agreed to encourage other jurisdictions to get their agreements signed. Dumbwaiters Billy brought the issue of the charge for dumbwaiters. He has had complaints about the full $150 charge for them. He asked the advisory committee if they would recommend a lesser charge. The committee agreed to recommend $75 and Linda Venturoni will take that proposal to the NWCCOG Board for approval. Glenwood Springs Glenwood Springs has asked to be included in the program and the committee agreed that due to their location it would make sense. Linda will take this to the NWCCOG Board for approval. M/S/P Jerry Wooldridge, Jerry Booth to recommend the inclusion of Glenwood Springs in the Elevator Inspection Program. Advisory Committee Structure It was suggested that the meetings be held on a monthly basis while getting the program going and that these meetings be held just prior to the NWCCOG Board meetings. M/S/P Mark Marchus, Jerry Booth to hold the Elevator Inspection Advisory Committee meetings on the fourth Tuesday of each month at 1:30 PM at•the Summit County Building Department meeting room. A discussion took place as to whether people other than building officials should be included on the Advisory Committee and it was decided to limit participation to one representative from each local jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction will be asked to appoint a specific representative to the committee. An agenda for the meetings will be sent out two weeks before each meeting with a request for any additional agenda items. Software Linda Venturoni reported that there is software available that will do inspection reports, billing and certificate production through a company that she has contacted. They are sending a demonstration disk for us to look at. Financial Linda Venturoni reported that there have been a lot of start-up costs but that we have sent out about $8000 in billings and hope to start seeing some cash flow soon. It was decided to hold off on the purchase of a vehicle for the time being and Billy will be using one of the COG ~ cars . Mark Marcus suggested that at the next meeting we split up the unsigned jurisdictions and start a phone call campaign to encourage participation. Next Meeting The next meeting will be held Tuesday, April 27, 1993 at 1:30 PM at the Summit County Building Department meeting room. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 AM. . Sample Resolution/Ordinance RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE NO. Before the Board/Council/Etc. of the County/Town in the State of Colorado AMENDING THE COUNTY/TOWN BUILDING CODE SO AS TO ADOPT APPENDIX CHAT t trR S l OF THE 1991 (Insert Appropriate Edition) CODES W~IEREAS, The Board/Council/ Etc. has determined that it is in the interest of the public to establish minimum safety requirements for new and existing elevators and that an elevator certification and permitting program should be established to insure that elevators have annual independent inspections; WHEREAS, The Board/Council/Etc. has heretofore adopted a Building Code as allowed under Colorado State Statutes; WHEREAS, The County/Town building inspector has recommended the amendment of the Building Code so as to include Appendix Chapter 51 of the 1991 (Insert Appropriate Edition) Edition of the Uniform Building Code, with amendments; WHEREAS, The Board/Council/Etc. has held a public hearing on the proposed amendments, upon public notice as provided by law, on (Insert the Date of the Hearing) and has considered the statements and testimony presented at the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board/Council/Etc. finds that the proposed amendments will promote the public health, safety and welfare, and should be adopted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD/COUNCIL/ETC., as follows: Section 1. Adoption of the Codes. The following are hereby adopted as part of the County/Town Building Code: (a) The Uniform Building Code, 1991 edition (Insert Appropriate Edition), as previously amended, including Appendix Chapter 51 published by the International Conference of Building Officials; ' Section 2. Amendments. The codes adopted, are hereby amended so as to incorporate the following additions, deletions and modifications: (a) Uniform Building Code: Appendix Chapter 51, Section 5110(e},Fees. Annual Certificates of Inspection: amend this paragraph to read: For each elevator, escalator, moving walk, or commercial dumbwaiter $150.00. For the purpose of this section, each escalator or moving walk unit powered by one motor shall be considered as a separate escalator or moving walk Section 3. Repeal. All previous editions of the codes adopted hereby, and all Resolutions or parts of Resolutions, or codes or parts of codes, in conflict or inconsistent herewith, are hereby repealed to such extent and superseded. Section 4. Severability. If any part or parts of this Resolution or any code adopted hereby is for any reason held to be invalid, such shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution of such code. ADOr i ~D this day of ,1992 BOARD/COUNCIL/ETC. OF COL~'TY/TOWN, COLORADO BY: Board/Council/Etc. Chairman Ai t r.ST: County Clerk and Recorder -2- ~ NORTHWEST COLORADO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Post Office Box 2308 Silverthorne, Colorado 80498 303 468-0295 FAX 303 468-1208 ADDENDIIM TO MIi~ v 1 E3 At the March 25th N~?~lhwest Colorado Council of Governments Meeting the Board authorized the Elevator Inspection Advisory Committee recommendations as•follows: 1. To change•the fee for dumbwaiter inspections from $150 to $75 per year. _ 2. To add the City of Glenwood Springs to the, Elevator Inspection Program. ' - , . Eagle County: Avon, Basalt, Eagle, Gypsum, Minturn, Red Cliff, Vail, 'Grand County: Fraser, Granby, Grand Lake, Hot Sulphur Springs, Kremmling, Winter Park, 'Jackson County: Walden, ' Pitkin County: Aspen, Snowmass Village, ' Routt County: Hayden, Oak Creek, Steamboat Springs, Yampa, 'Summit County: Blue River, Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Montezuma, Silverthorne ~ ~ ~y TOWN OF v~IL 7S South Frontage Road Department of Public Works/Transportation Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2158/FAX 303-479-2166 April 2, 1993 Mr. & Mrs. John Wynn 908 Merion Square Road Gladwyne, PA 19035 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wynn, ` Thank you for your recent letter regarding your stay in Vail. We are pleased to hear your positive feedback regarding the pedestrian bridge and the recently dedicated International Bridge. Regarding your concerns about the streamwalk, the Town of Vail has not in the past maintained the actual walkpath during the winter. Signs are installed stating that the wallkpath is not maintained during the winter season. The Town did, however, maintain the steps by the Vail Athletic Club in the past. This winter, we did not maintain these steps and it appears to have been an oversight on our part. We contract with a private company to remove snow from Town-owned sidewalks and stairs. Until you brought it to our attention, we were not aware this section was left out of the contract. In the future, we plan on maintaining these stairs. ~Your input is appreciated and we apologize for any inconvenience this incident may have caused. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or desire additional information. Sincerely, reg 11 Acting Director Department Public Works/Transportation GH/slh cc : Town `~`Caunci~ Larry Grafel x~ ~ f J~/~ An attractive view, says award-winning architect Henrik Bull, is worth these special cautions when ® THE DESIRE TO L[VE on moun- article, "Ostentatious House Disease;' written fain slopes isn't new to the 20th by Jack Campbell. The author describes OHD century. In the mountains of Eu- as a sort of mental illness, commonly manifest- rope, for example, ed in the moneyed classes. "The victims of this most traditional vii- disorder," says Campbell, "traditionally lages were built on choose an elevated location for their house, so hillsides for impor- that as much of the community as possible is tant reasons: ease of forced to witness their condition:' defense and the need to preserve limited tracts In Ketchum, Idaho, town planners have come of flat land for agriculture. up with one cure for the dreaded OHD: They've Land was more plentiful in the New World. established view corridors, restricted earth- As aresult, farming towns in New England and moving and limited the height of houses .so mining towns in the West were usually Located they're less obtrusive to people living below. in mountain valleys, where construction and In the forested mountains of the Sierra Neva- ~ r ~ ~ ~ i Ys :'r.-e. ~ j , g .~a ~ ' Uphill property y ~ ~ ' ~ Dr~_~~a eswale _ a ~ ~ . ~ Do not slope; ~ ! g _ Downhiltproperty View obstructions: roof toward ' - j _ ~ power lines, roads, driveways or E other houses entrances. View Avoid icicles. W ~ ~ ~ , E ' e~, w :a ~ 6°'° Driveway slopes CHOOSE A SLOPE • 5 WISELY FOR _ ~ ~ ~ $ ° SUN EXPOSURE ~ - ~ ° h y 4 3.:c,~S.i f y f F r r'7~~yt..r, l i C ~ ~ tT r y ~ - t -c - Ia7°`o 71(JP , ~ t .kfz'~ ~ a~. ~ k ~ t..'C t ~ L_. ~ ~ r f.~7~5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' ~3' ~....i.+JY~..-w.n......y.._ ~i m. t. ~-,mom.. - 1'.~..:..,. w..M. OBSERVE GRADIENT ~ transportation were easier. da and New England, trees often screen hillside GUIDELINES ~ these mountain towns made the transition homes. The natural curtain allows people to - to resort communities, convenience took a back build in defiance of good taste. Obviously, they m 22% Hillside slope: - seat to newcomers' desires for scenic views. Red would do better to build homes that blend into Erosion problems ~ Mountain above Aspen and the Potato Patch at the natural topography, using color and local z ~ ~ are likely. ~ _ ~ ~ ~,~ti~ J r ` Vail, for example, are now two of the most prized materials such as fieldstone and timber. An ar- ~s ~ ~ livi locations in snow coup chitect hel s. While views are generally better from the What other things should people consider hills, an increasing number of mountain resi- before building a mountainside home? Here ~ dents believe it's desirable to control the view are seven important factors: of the hills. In marry communities-particular- •Near-sighted views. Does an access road ly in the Rockies, where slopes are often tree- pass between the building site and view? Will less-people have voiced concern about mam- overhead power lines follow the right•of-way? moth homes appearing on hillsides. Will future construction block the view? The Zephyr, an alternative newspaper in • Sun exposure. Anyone shopping for Moab, Utah, drew attention to the issue in an property during summer will find that most 42 SN01V COUNTRY JANUARY FEBRUARY 1993 r ~ . ~ r ~ ' ~ ' MOUNTAINSIDE HOME continued ~ ~ T ru i i it i i •I i ~~y. _ ~ ~,x .,t-~, ~ - - a,,~ to. - ! tr a~ma~n~n~n ~ 'ages I~f. _ir1~v infer @.. r': -pnn~ o , ~ , • heyftoar a _ ~ . townslfarms ~ sites are sunny. Smart buyers, though, realize thoroughly waterproofed. _ _ _ that the lower winter sun and shorter days • Development cost. Large retaining walls ` ~ ; ` make exposure critical. Because most ski re- with sub-surface drainage systems and water- ` r~ ~ ~ ~ sorts in North America face north or east, a ski- proofing needed for hillside construction can i'`~=~.. _ ~ in, ski-out slopeside location is likely to be in be expensive. But if occupied spaces can be ~ shade much of the winter. kept above grade, foundation costs need not be • Accessibility. No one wants to install tire excessive, even on steep hillsides. Poor site ' chains to crawl up a driveway. What seems like accessibility for the builder, though, can cause - a gentle slope on dry pavement can become a expenses to grow. Hauling construction mate- dreadful inconvenience after a 2-inch snowfall. rials uphill any distance quickly adds up. ,Y • - t - Slopes greater than 6 percent (6 feet of rise • Site selection. Are the best building sites • ~ along 100 feet of length) may prove an incon- on the uphill or downhill side of the access _ venience for two-wheel-drive vehicles. road? Several factors should be considered, in- Access roads may be somewhat steeper-8 eluding degree of steepness, required setbacks _ to 10 percent maximum-but they typically from the property line, view and sun exposure. :1~- must be negotiated with four-wheel drive after A steep site with large setback requirements ' ` a snowfall. Potential buyers and architects could mean hauling skis, luggage and groceries r: should also anticipate the location and design up a long slope; and south-facing slopes get ,r', MARCH 20•APRIL 3, 1993 r~•. of the driveway. Sun exposure is important. A better exposure from the low winter sun. ~ ~ ."z south- or west-facing driveway melts off soon- What's likely to be the biggest trend in hill- • er than one oriented north or east. side housing in the near future? Perhaps a re- . , . .~3 • Buildin -site radient. In some arts of duction in size! In the 1980s, the mountain va- ~ g g P . , . , • , . , the country, developers grade hillsides to cre- cation • home assumed the dimensions of a , , . , , ate flat building sites, or "pads" far larger than large suburban primary residence. Jacuzzis, ~ • . , the houses that will be built on them. This saunas and lavish game rooms became sought- • ~ practice destroys a hillside's beauty and cre- after luxuries. ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ; ' ates alternating grades of flat versus steep ter- But in these nervous '90s, [believe basic rain, increasing the likelihood of erosion. economics will cause a return to cabin-like va- ' ' ' ' • " [f a property has been subdivided and is sub- cation homes, averaging about 1,500 square ' ' ' ' ' ' • ject to planning restrictions, chances are good feet. Look for more of them to be set unobtru- • ` ' • ' ~ the building-site slope won't be greater than 22 sively on hillsides, overlooking picturesque ~ ' ' percent-about 12 degrees. Steeper slopes, mountain valleys. • cautions the Federal Soil Conservation Service, ~ are not recommended for development. Henrik Bull is a noted San Francisco architect .,.r. ~ ,y, ~ • Drainage. Site development shouldn't in- who has designed snow country homes hom .~.y terrupt the flow of surface or underground wa- ~ Squaw Valley to '~~p U ter. Construction on hilltops and bluffs usually ~ BeauerCreek His si ned The re uires the least accommodation for runoff firm de g ~ . ~ q Outpost at Keystone The hart of ~merlea~~ S11ll11~p. = and drainage, but such sites are scarce. J z~- ~ r D.F On a slope, land must be graded to divert _ ;and Spruce Saddle -mss - „~{4~ water away from the building, and under- '3 atBeauerCreek, ground water must be intercepted by perforat- 4 . ' ~ SNOW CourrmvNa- ~ ~ tional Ski Area De- ed pipes laid in gravel ditches. Even so, under- ' ground foundation retaining walls should be _ m si;rtAward winners. 44 SN01V COUNTRI' JAI~'UARtiFEBRU.ARY 1993 I THE NEW YORK TIM~.S, SUNDAY, MARCH 28, 1993 Conversations /Fred Kent one Who Would Like to see Most Architects Hit the Road observing and listening and asking what Ute attitude about a street. People are going to be By MARTINGOTTLIEB concerns arc;' Mr. Kent said in his Green- backing in and out, which traffic engineers with Village office one day recently, "and call'friction,'aHd friction in their eyes is bad. ~E plenty of other people enthusiastic what we're finding out is [hat design proles- To us, friction is good. More people are over President Clinton's ideas for re- sionals and trattic engineers are trying to do looking around and they're cautious, and they building America's infrastructure, something very different from what people see people and say hello to them." Fred Kent spends a lot of time think- are telling them they want done. The land- It the small-is-beautiful flow seems out of a ing about how to remake roads, parks and scape architect, for example, will often come psychedelic•era teach•in, that wouldn't be tar streetscapes. His thoughts, though, run in from adesign-aesthetic point of view and from the mark. Although Mr. Kent worked counter to familiar notions. when you talk topeople in the community you for Citibank for a few years in the late 60's, , Fresh blacktop be damned, Show Fred Lind they want something they can touch, he returned to Columbia University, studied Kent a sleek highway cutting through a where they can walk and interact with their with Margaret Mead. on the way to a gradu- oeighborhotxland his ideas run this way: add neighbors. ate degree in geography, and in 1970 coordi- paralleiparking, throw up a stop Hated Earth Day activities. sign or two, don't worry so much His career was shaped by his about fixing potholes - in other work with William H. Whyte, words, slow things down. who as a magazine editor dis- Depttsit him amid the gleam- covered the visionaryt, urban ing towers of almost any Ameri- ' theorist, Janc J@wbs, and inter can downtown - in logging shaped breakthrough studies o! - 170,000 air miles last year he the way people interact in cities. saw a fair number of them - ~ ) Using young assistams, Mr. and he will raise one of hfs pe-~ , Whyte counted people on public rennial questions: "Why in ev- plazas and ligured out where ery town is the last building the .l - they gravitated and why. He worst building9" ~ filmed streets over 24 hours Present him with state of the tC~r. ~ ' f j Irom fixed, time•lapsc cameras art thinking o/ leading archi- 'I' j 4'>~ k,,, / 1 and used photographs to record facts, urban planners, trattic en• - " "n random public interactions. gineers or landscape architects ~ fir; and a spark of anger will tint the Street Rhythms fresh-faced boyish features he ' o qq i has carried with him into his 'r1~F~.' Among the observations: Pco- lY torties. "it's the same with ev ~ ~ i~ pie like to gather in settings that 1 ery discipline that has become, ' i attract other people. Lovers like quote, 50 'professional; " he to kiss smack in the middle of says. "These disciplines have the street. People like streets distanced themselves from serv- with stores. People like to move ing the communities whose in- chairs before sitting in them, • tereststheyshoWdberetlecting M~ls•~a.eetmtrurrnrtx.vwiinme. even if they eventually move or even understanding what Fred Kent on Hollywood Boulevard in Los Mgeles. them back to the position they [hose communities' needs are, found them in. There are few "Architects are trying to get things people enjoy watching into architecture magazines and more than a passing parade. utey bandy about architectural jargonese Mr, Kent, along with his longtime col• that no normal person can understand, and league Kathy Madden, was one of Mr. then what they deliver is stuff that is out of An urban thinker rails Whyte's young associates. The legacy is txmtext with communities." present in the re-design of $ryant Park, the Mc Kent is president of a 17•yearald not- a t planners W120 Jilt classically formal oasis at 92d Street in Man- tor-protilgroop called the Project for Public hattan. Cloistered and barely visible from the Spaces, which has traveled widely retrofit- d On rt understand street becattsc of along wall, it had been the ring problematic parks, plazas, commercial domain of drug dealers. strips, skyscrapers and sttbstantial chunks of people: `Wh y in every "we interviewed the drug dealers -there downtowns. Whether in high-profile efforts were something like seven or eight different like the master plan for MaMattan's spec- 4 groups; ' Mr. Kent recalled. "They saw them- . tacularly transformed $ryant Park or in .own is the last selves as businessmen and their intention quieter ones like the revival of a struggling was to keep the perk sate because it there block of Stores in Corpus Christi, Tex., the building the worst was any kind of crime -their idea of crime principles remain the same: For ati the y, ~ being killing - it would keep their customers exoduses to suburbs, mails, and clusters of building? away. But Ne people on the outside were office parks on the outskirts of cities, Mr. staying away because they believed crime Kent believes the urban experiettce to Ue one was occurring because of the drug dealers. that most people find natural and would like "We expanded the entranceways dramati- to enjoy. The more bustle the better, wish Ute tally so that people could get in and see in key to creating it lying in closely monitoring "ln all the surveys we've done around from the street. And the activities inside and tmderstanding actions and opinions of shopping districts, we've found the biggest were greatly increased. ordinary people- problems aren't security issues, they're traf- "WC figured out where people stopped to tic issues -the speed of vehicles, the noise of buy drugs and that's where we put a food A Vivid Alternative vehicles, congestion." service. The drug dealers had to find other In a survey last year In Long Beach, Calif., places to go outside the park." As Mr. Clinton's multi-billiondollar public for example, nu more than 25 percent of the Elegant, movable chairs were installM works plan is debated in Washington, the partkipants said they were concerned about and mosC people shift them with the sun, turn - populist insights of Mr. Kent and his project crime. But 80 to 9tt percent said Utey feared them toward a friend, or shift them back to colleagues provide a vivid alternative to the speeding traffic on a highway that split a the position they were in to begin with. Few what many view as the excesses of the great community shopping street "They felt the have been stolen. postwar era of public construction. During neigh_..:...1 had been taken away from "You see," said Mr. Kent. "By having a that peNod, thousands o1 miles of roads them;' Mr. Kent remarked. high level of activity, you can take back - spread from the cities, but they emptied "li you start looking at that, you start control over a park. many a ceighborhtxxf in the process. Hun• realizing that, gee, if you created Less traftlc "And where you have a high level of activi- , Breda of high-rise public housing towers shot flow, slower vehicles, you create more of a ty, you can't have crime." up, prtrviding modern apartments to the poor, community and you increase Ute perception but frequently turning viable neighborhoods of safety and security. The biggest, easiest into bleak no-man's lands, thing to do is go from through traffic to angle "We're Roing back into communities and parking. !t changes the whole character and _ -A-" RECEIVED MAR 3 0 1993 DISTRIBUTION LIST - PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST BRIAN ANDERSON ERNST GLATZLE TOWN COUNCIL STEVE BARWICK GARY MURRAIN DEBBIE ROELAND MIKE BRAKE MARY LAWRENCE MIKE ROSE DICK DURAN SUSIE HERVERT TODD SCHOLL CAROLINE FISHER JIM HOZA DAN STANEK ANNIE FOX DD DETO LEO VASQUEZ JOHN GALLEGOS JOE KOCHERA PAM BRANDMEYER KRISTIN PRITZ CHARLIE OVEREND LARRY ESKWITH PETE BURNETT TODD OPPENHEIMER KEN HUGHEY JODY DOSTER MANUEL MEDINA FILE JANEIL TURNBULL P.W. INFO. BOARD MEMORANDUM T0: LARRY GRAFEL, ACTING-TOWN MANAGER FROM: GREG HALL, ACTING-DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/TRANSPORTATION DATE: MARCH 29, 1993 RE: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 22 - April 2, 1993 ::.f.. J f r'i . . n-. ~::::x-::w. x..~:::-~:: xf:::::.i:.i::•: v:n_:::::: ri:?ii•}:•}:iLii}. ~:•:.ii: i::...::: , ry........ . f n. x ^ n, w::: ~v:::-',•. ~::::•.'Fr':: rnv::.~ v:::::::::::: i:.: w::::: xr~:.....: f~: : : •r ti}{f//iir••••:r:n:: ni'?%~{~.v •S/,i vi:?:~: r}:}.::::f w::::: tF:. f~: f.<. J.LrI f,.{rt:y. svfx /rx::::::::: -:.~:::::::.~.:x::: s::..:..... i:'. r rf a ffi.:r. y::::::::::::.: FM In......:: .li.~:?-:.i..x:::: - ~ i~.t -i ..:.u n?v:}}:f::?.!/..:I... v:: :-:-A.fir+v:::::::.:;sib, ..:+.::r'.fii:~v//~Gi.`?~.4~..f+Q'~}:-: H.'i-.}. r`#.f:...v.•~f+h,:/ -..Y•''•;. ,?f}~~': x...........x..n ...:........:i fr:?:i~r~ l.l., sff./f},.{I~::?•:: n•v::: x.~ rv::::•}::::::: A... •::..,..{x..,-:.....r:}.i-:::: is}:::::: • - .ll, ~:r r. ::~.~x. w Yff ~,+f..•. ~ STREETS AND ROADS A. 1. Construct various signs: a. Village loading signs for core. b. 4-Way to Gold Peak, handicap skier service signs. c.- 2 "Caution-Falling Debris/Use at Own Risk" for underpass at Aspen Lane and install at both ends. d. Miscellaneous signs as determined by Engineer. e. "Parking in designated spaces...etc." 2. Remove garland throughout Town as needed. 3. Patch potholes throughout Town - weather permitting. 4. Sweep throughout Town - weather permitting. 5. Remove Christmas tree lighting. 6. Remove Bike Path Bridge behind Sewer Plant/Old Town Shop. 7. Order 1'h rock for road repair. 8. Order sand for spring run off (sandbags). 9. Fix fence at west end of paved parking lot of Bail Field. 10. Take the 3J8" aggregate out of dumpster and return dumpster to BFI. PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION A. 1, Assist contractor with installation of block for locker room at VTC. 2, Install handrail on west side of Municipal Building. 3. Repair damaged pavers in various locations at VTC. 4. Perform schedule maintenance at Lionshead Auxiliary Building. PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY LIST Page 2 PARKING STRUCTURE/TRANSPORTATION CONT. 5. Adjust counter tops at VTC Restroom for ADA standards. 6. Pick up trash as snow melts. 7. Complete & submit Section 18 Grant document by April 15th. CARPENTERS A. 1. Repair signs. 2. Construct Public Work's restroom remodel. 3. Construct gate boxes. 4. Repair Wall Street railing. 5. Repair Bridge rail on Buffehr Creek Road. ELECTRICIANS A. 1. Repair various street light outages. 2. Wire connection for new gate. 3. Wire electrical for Public Work's restroom remodel. 4. Coordinate with Andy receiving bids on an emergency generator for LHTRC. 5. Repair J. Box at VTC 2nd level storage. 6. Disconnect heat corrector from high voltage at elevator room. 7. Repair light at Hong Kong planter/Bridge Street. 8. Inspect all Generator's in Town of Vail Building's. PARKS DEPARTMENT A. 1. Finalize design for Gore Creek Promenade/Pedestrian Bridge. 2. Hire consultant for Mill Creek/Ted Kindel Park. 3. Set up utility meeting for Mill Creek/Ted Kindel Park. 4. Check point to point radio communication from Potato Patch to East and West Vail. 5. Order plants for "Trees for Vail". 6. Review open space/park standards for masterplan project. GH/jlt SFNT BY:EAGLE COUhiTY ; 4- 2-93 ; 12:20 ; 3Q332872D7--> 3Q34792157;# 1J 2 _ ;:v April 2, 1393 - 10:39 ElbGIE C,OtMTI' BtlILDIMG 55! BROA[NXIAY QFFIfi Of SHE PA. BO% 850 13t7AR0 l7F COMMISSIONERS ' EAt;LF, CQIc]R11Dp 81631 (303) 319.8605 FAX: {383) 328.7207 i::,;• ~A~~~ ~~~~~i L~~VIt/'t~ A G~Nt~~l ~t]~4RD DF ~DUItITY ~t'~MI~IlS~It~IV~R~S f~'E,ULAR N!'EFTIII~~ D.4 Y .APRIL 7~, ~,~93 ~1F f ~ f i i iF Ip ik b iF IF -0F iF 9! iF i! iF ~r 9F iF 1F ~ ! # f 1F iF fi 9F 94 iF ~F 9E iF iF 09:00 - 7 D: 30 WORK SfSS/QN - WEEfCI Y UPDA TF alrortne t~~v ~a , Jack D. Lewis, County Manager 10:30 - ~ 9: OD BREAK ~ 1:00 - 92:00 INpRK SESS/D11/ - PENUftVG L1TiGAT/Ulll Mt of Ufe Naly Croaa Ream James R, Fr;tzo, County Attorney ~2: oa - a ~:sn LUNCf;I 0 y: 311- 02: Dtl WORK SESSIQM - MFETIIVGS A ~ ~ tJIfDfD Mr of the Ho/Y Glasa noo~~ t72:d0 - 02: r5 GCIIVSENT CALENDAR rr~s OFA ROVT/NFAND Na~u-coNTfrot~7rsut MAtut~ a~tF PL~tCCO Q+v rHF Conrs~nrr cgt.Enraart ro Attaw Ttrf attAAnu of COUNTY GOMAI/SSlO/VERS TO SP1ENp T~4GE /lN0 ENfltGY pN MOflE' !M!'URTAIYT 1JFY1s ON A LENGTHY AG;ENt~{. ANY COMMONER MAY flEQUCST THATAN 1TFM 9E 9tEbd01/Zp' FAOhI THECON'.,EAIT CALFNOAA' ANU GUNSIDEfaED SEPARATEiY. ANY M~861~ OF THE FUBLlC MAY ItEQVEST' ANY ITEM BE R£1NOVED` FffUM THE CD/VSENT AGENOi4, 1. BILL PAYING Linda PankuCh, .Acc©unting Mark Silvertharn, Acting Contra/%r ACT/t7N: Approva/subject t+v review by the Cr~unty Manager: 2. PAYRUtt FOR APRIL 16, 9993 Jack D. Lewis, County Manager ANION: Approval subject to review by the County Manager, SENT BY:EAGLE COUNTY 4- 2-93 12:21 ; 3033287207-~ 3034792157;# 21 2 . - 3. LIQUOR LICENSE NEARING -EAGLE VA1L RESTAURANT GRO(!P LTD d4a PADDY$ Mary Jo Berenato, Assistant County Attorney ACTJpN: Consider approval. 02: ~5 - 02:30 A. HARDWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO AND BUSI11tE35 RECORDS CORPORATION FOR VOTING MACHINE'S Sara Fisher, Clerk & Recorder ACTION.• Consider approval_ B. CONTRACT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO AND BONDI 8r CQ. Sherry Brandon, County Treasurer ACT/DN: CpnSider approval. C_ AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGlE COUNTY AND C & S PRODUCTIONS ICORAUD/O SERVICES ANd FREE STALL' LIGHTS TO BE PROVIDED AT FAGLE COUNTY FAIR AND RODEO Jackie Lacy, Fair Coordinator ACT10N. Consider approval. D. RESOLUTIDNAUTNORIZING THE CLERICANfi RECORDFR TO ISSUE TEMPORARY PERMITS AND TEMPORARY l1CE/VSES CONCERNING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND BEER WITHIN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF EAGLE COUNTY Mary Jo Berenato, Assistan# County Attorney ACTION.• Consider apprc~vel. n~:RO - OS:3D WORK SESSION -PRESENTATION OF THE RL~GORD OF ~ ate ~ ~ DECISION SIGNED BY THE EPA MARCH 26, tR93 FOR FURTXER ACTION AT THE EAGLE MINE SITE Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer 03.•30 -(13:45 BREAK 03.45 - WORK SESSION - CpMMUNITY DEVELOP/NENT nrr of uw K~v Keith Man tag, Director THE NEXT AIL"1: e H ~fG OF THE FAGLE COL/YTY GYJ~1Ml~SIQNFfRC 1A/IL! 8E HFLD ONAPIRA T 3 1993 THRSAGFNDAl3hROVlOCDIQ/tlNrf)ftti(ATKJNALPIIRf~+03E5WitLV-ALLT/~[4£SARFAP~ROX/MATT rMPBpARD WHILE JN SESSION AZgY CONS/DFJ~ OTHLR rrEA~S THAT AAE biROUGNT HfIr4RElT. PAGE 2 RECEfVED MA!~ ~ i 1993 ,.,~,~rEYS ~ coinvsEw~s ~ LAw 3000 FIRST IIv, ew.A'IE .~.w e,. NORTI3 c«ARAno eo2a2 1ELEPFIONE: 303 247-2900 FAX: 303 29&0940 TELEX: 454368 vrrn.c~ IN: COLORADO arn.,v.r5 RENO • LAS VEGAS March 25, 1993 TO OUR VALUED COLORADO-BASED CLIENTS Dear Friends: Enclosed as a special supplement to our March edition of PublicFinance Legal News is the 1993 Legislative Update. The Update summarizes a number of bills which are currently being considered by the Colorado General Assembly. We believe the bills we have included in the Update may be of particular interest to our public finance clients. The Update reports on the status of each bill as of 8:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 24th. Many of the bills we have selected for inclusion in the Update have been amended since their original introduction. The summaries in the Update for such bills reflect any substantive amendments to those bills. If you have questions concerning any of the bills included in the Update, or any other bills which are pending in the legislature, please feel free to contact Maria Prevedel (299-8220) or K.C. Veio (299-8462). Very truly yours, ~t -~,~c,,, .G~ Maria Prevedel r, Y K.C. Veio ~~'ILWCI;~- ~ Encl. /l JV ~dd ~N~~ • 3~t-43 ~'E~tlVED ~ 1 ~~93 Sherman & Howard ' 1993 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE HOUSE BILL 93-1021 Status: Passed 3rd reading in Senate BY REPRESENTATIVE Anderson CONCERNING LIABILITY FOR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM SPECIAL DISTRICTS. Requires that the order for exclusion of property from a special district contain a recital of any outstanding bonded indebtedness for which the property to be excluded is liable. Provides that the failure of the order to contain such information when due to error or omission by the special district, shall not constitute grounds for correction of the omission of a levy on the property from the assessment roll. Applies to privately owned and municipal property which is excluded from a special district. HOUSE BILL 93-1027 Status: Became Law on March 2nd BY REPRESENTATIVES Thiebaut, Anderson, Kerns, and Ratteree; also SENATORS Bishop, Gallagher, and Martinez. CONCERNING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION RELA t rli TO AUDITS OF GOVERNMENTAL EN i i i iF.S PERFORMED BY THE STATE AUDITOR'S OrriCE. Provides that statements, records, schedules, working papers, and memoranda prepared by a certified public accountant in the employ of the State Auditor's Office, in the course of professional service to the Legislative Audit Committee, shall be and remain the property of the state auditor's office and shall be kept confidential unless a majority of the members of the Legislative Audit Committee vote to open such documents. counties. Increases the amount of motor vehicle registration fees retained by counties to defray expenses for issuing motor vehicle licenses and for issuing special license plates. Increases the amount of each special registration fee remitted by the department to the county general fund and the amount credited to the department's special purpose account from the issuance of any duplicate certificate of title. HOUSE BILL 93-1039 Status: House concurs to Senate Amendments BY REPRESENTATIVE May; also SENATOR Wattenberg. CONCERNING PROPERTY TAX LIABILITY ON FRACTIONAL IlV t CRESTS IN WELLS OR FIELDS OPERATED AS UNITS FOR THE PRODUt~ t iON OF OII., GAS OR OTHER HYDROCARBONS. For property tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1993 requires nonoperating interest owners in oil or gas wells to submit an annual report of total revenues received from production taken in kind from such unit for use by the unit operator in determining the production sales price at the wellhead. Requires property taxes assessed on units to be allocated to interest owners of such unit in the same proportion that the revenues earned by each owner bears to the total revenues earned on such unit. Provides that unit operators shall not be liable for the total amount of taxes levied against a gas well with fractional interest owners if such operator fails to remit the entire amount of such tax. Provides that money remaining in an account established for the payment of property taxes on the production of any unit shall, upon abandonment of such unit, be divided among the nonoperating interest owners of such unit in proportion to the amount contributed to such account by each owner. -3- ' HOUSE BILL 93-1053 Status: Referred to House Appropriations Committee BY REPRESENTATIVE Romero CONCERNING A REQUIREMENT THAT THE MONEYS GENERATED BY THE SURCHARGES IMPOSED ON THE FEES OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE BE CREDi i ~D TO A SPECIAL FUND FOR APPROPRIATION FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES. Creates the Colorado first fund. Directs that the moneys generated by the surcharges on the fees charged by the secretary of state be credited to the Colorado first fund rather than the general fund. Provides that the moneys in the Colorado first fund shall be available for appropriation by the general assembly for economic development purposes. HOUSE BILL 93-1054 Status: Signed by Governor BY REPRESENTATIVE June; also SENATOR Lacy. CONCERNING THE ELIMINATION OF THE TIME LIlVIITATION ON ANY CONTRACT ENTERED INTO BY ANY Ivy i ttOPOLITAN SEWAGE DISPOSAL DISTRICT. Eliminates the 50-year time limitation on any contract entered into by any metropolitan sewage disposal district. -5- HOUSE BILL 93-1080 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in Senate BY REPRESENTATIVE Agler; also SENATOR Schroeder. CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO STATUTORY PROVISIONS RELATING TO COUN i irS. Eliminates the county population threshold necessary for sheriffs to request assistance from a .fire protection district or municipality in controlling or extinguishing a fire and for such district or municipality to be entitled to reimbursement for such assistance. Levies an additional cost on persons convicted of offenses involving bodily injury to any person by a dog and persons convicted of any ordinance resulting in injury or death to a victim, and provides for the deposit of such cost in the crime victim compensation fund. Empowers a board of county commissioners to ban open fires under certain circumstances, to regulate the uses of land for drainage-related purposes, and to establish regulations controlling certain land-disturbing activities, such as site grading, filling and excavating. Adds soil and vegetation conservation and protection against air and water quality degradation to those matters a board of county commissioners may include in zoning regulations. Allows an urban renewal plan to contain a provision for the division of property taxes levied on property and municipal sales taxes collected within an urban renewal area. Requires, in connection with such a division, that a portion of property taxes levied on property in the urban renewal area and municipal sales taxes collected within the urban renewal area be paid into the funds of each such public body. Eliminates the allocation of excess municipal sales tax collected within such area into the funds of the municipality. Requires that a county give express written consent to the inclusion of taxes produced by a levy on taxable property in an urban renewal area in connection with an urban renewal plan. -7- included in the conduct and discipline code including provisions relating to remedial discipline ' plans for disruptive students and policies concerning gang-related activities. Requires school districts to take whatever actions are necessary to enforce the conduct and discipline code. Requires every school to report to the school district on the learning environment in the school during the past school year and requires the school district to compile the reports for all its schools into a single report which must be submitted to the state board of education. Allows the state board of education to withhold accreditation from a school district that fails to provide a learning environment in the schools of the district. Requires school districts to establish, as an alternative to suspension, a policy that encourages parents to attend school with their child and also makes the parent responsible for seeing that a child expelled from public school for the remainder of the school year is educated in a nonpublic school or at home during the period of expulsion. Makes expulsion from public school mandatory if the child is declared to be an habitually disruptive student. Makes mandatory expulsion the only option when certain serious violations specified in existing law are committed. Includes language in the compulsory attendance statute concerning the responsibility of the parent for educating a child who is expelled from public school for the remainder of the school year. HOUSE BILL 93-1102 Status: Assigned to House Finance Committee BY REPRESENTATIVE Pankey CONCERNING AN INCREASE IN THE AVAILABII.ITY OF TAX CREDITS TO TAXPAYERS. Makes the corporate investment tax credit available to all taxpayers. Creates an income tax credit in the amount of 10% of the purchase price of a qualifying investment bond for taxpayers purchasing qualified investment bonds issued by a qualified Colorado business. Limits the amount of tax credit to $10,000 per taxable year. -9- Exempts from property taxation a perpetual conservation easement in gross which is granted exclusively for conservation purposes and which is granted to a qualified organization as defined in the act. HOUSE BILL 93-1129 Status: Referred to House Finance Committee BY REPRESENTATIVES Keller and Pierson. CONCERNING THE IMPOSTITON OF FEES FOR THE PAYMENT OF EXCESS TRANSPORTATION COSTS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS. Eliminates the voter approval requirement for the imposition and collection of transportation fees by school districts allowing instead for a school district board of education to impose and collect such a fee upon atwo-thirds majority vote of such board. HOUSE BILL 93-1138 Status: Laid over for Concurrence by House to Senate Amendments BY REPRESENTATIVE Owen; also SENATOR R. Powers. CONCERNING THE DIVISION OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL TAXES FOR A PERIOD IN EXCESS OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS. Allows any urban renewal plan to contain a provision for the division of municipal sales and property taxes for a period in excess of the 25-year period of limitation for such a division. -11- adviser to act as a trustee or custodian. Requires that the trust fund be administered by an administrator and prohibits such administrator from acting as a trustee or custodian for the trust fund. Authorizes the division of securities and the securities commissioner to administer and enforce the provisions governing trust funds. Makes certain activities of a custodian and an investment adviser of a trust fund unlawful under the "Colorado Securities Act". Creates a new article 59.1 in title 11, C.R.S., entitled "Local Government Investment Pool Trust Fund Administration and Enforcement Act". Prohibits a board of trustees from investing the assets of and a local government from participating in a trust fund that is not registered with the securities commissioner. Describes the registration, reporting, annual audit, and filing fee requirements for a trust fund. Gives the securities commissioner access to the records of a trust fund and imposes confidentiality requirements in connection with such access. HOUSE BILL 93-1168 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in House BY REPRESENTATIVE Snyder; also SENATOR Wattenberg. CONCERNING SPE~:iriC OWNERSHIP TAXES COLLE~.i~D FROM THE USERS OF RENTAL MOTOR VEHIC'T FS, Imposes a fee for the services provided by county clerk and recorders in processing specific ownership taxes that are collected from the users of .rental motor vehicles when the owners of such vehicles elect this method of tax payment in lieu of the usual method of payment of such taxes. Imposes such fee both for rental vehicles based in Colorado and for rental vehicles based outside of the state. Requires that any moneys collected for such fee be apportioned in the same manner as specific ownership taxes. Modifies reporting procedures to require that any specific ownership tax report for rental vehicles be submitted in the county where the vehicles are rented rather than in the county where the principal place of business of the vehicle owner is located. -13- HOUSE BILL 93-1193 Status: Referred to House Judiciary Committee BY REPRESENTATIVE Coffman CONCERNING LIMITATIONS ON LOBBYING BY PUBLIC OrriCIALS Ar lax LEAVING PUBLIC Or r iCE. Prohibits specified public officials from paid lobbying before the general assembly, before any legislative committee, or before the state agency in which the official was employed for a specific period of time after such public officials leave public office. Provides criminal sanctions and civil penalties for former public officials who violate lobbying. restrictions. Permits the attorney general to void favorable state actions resulting from lobbying that is prohibited. Makes conforming amendments. HOUSE BILL 93-1196 Status: Referred to House Judiciary Committee BY REPRESENTATIVE Friednash CONCERNING CAMPAIGN FINANCE, AND, IN CONNE~.1 iON THEREWITH, LIMITING THE AMOUNT OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND PROHIBi i uJG LOBBYIST CONTRIBUTIONS TO MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND CANDIDATES FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DURING LEGISLATIVE SESSIONS AND TO THE GOVERNOR AND CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR DURING LEGISLATIVE SESSIONS OR WHILE LEGISLATION IS AWAITING THE GOVERNOR'S APPROVAL OR VETO. Limits the amount of political contributions that may be made to candidates running for public office. Prohibits candidates from accepting more than a specified percentage of contributions from political parties. Prohibits lobbyists and their employers from making campaign contributions to members of the general assembly, to the governor or to candidates for the general assembly or for governor during a regular session of the general assembly or to the governor or a candidate for governor when regular session legislation is pending before the governor. -15- • HOUSE BILL 93-1213 Status: Refereed to House Finance Committee BY REPRESENTATIVE Tanner CONCERNING REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR VACANT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCA t ~li IN MUNICIPALt t 1rS WITH A POPULATION IN EXCESS OF TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND. Requires an owner of residential property in a municipality with a population in excess of 200,000 to register such property locally as vacant residential property if the utilities have been disconnected for 90 days. Imposes a civil penalty payable to the state for failure to register such vacant property unless an exception to the registration requirement applies. HOUSE BILL 93-1223 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in Senate BY REPRESENTATIVE Faatz; also SENATOR R. Powers CONCERNING A LIMITATION ON THE PAYMENT OF POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TO GOVERNMENT-SUPPORTED EMPLOYEES. Prohibits the payment of post-employment compensation by any governmental unit or government-financed entity to any official or employee. Requires that any employment contract between a governmental unit or government-financed entity and an official or employee or any extension of such a contract state that: Such contract is subject to termination by either party at any time during the term of such contract; such official or employee shall be deemed to be an employee-at-will; and no compensation shall be paid to such official or employee after the termination of such contract except for compensation earned during the contract's term. -17- HOUSE BILL 93-1263 Status: Assigned to Senate State Affairs Committee BY REPRESENTATIVES Adkins, Foster, Coffman, 7erke, Owen, Ratterree, Salaz, Acquafresca, and Pfiffner; also SENATOR Owens. CONCERNING GOVERNMENT COMPS i i i iON WITH PRIVATE EN i ~RPRISE. Adds counties, municipalities, and any political subdivision, and departments, offices, commissions, institutions, boards, or other agencies thereof, to the state agencies prohibited from competing with Private enterprise. Removes the exemption from the prohibition against competition for the Colorado tourism board, the construction maintenance, and operation of state transportation facilities and the regional transportation district and transit construction authority. Repeals the provisions on competition with private enterprise by institutions of higher education thereby subjecting such institutions to the same prohibition as other governmental agencies. HOUSE BILL 93-1265 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in Senate BY REPRESENTATIVE S. Greenwood, Hagedorn, R. Hernandez, and Pierson; also SENATORS Schaffer, Ruddick, Meiklejohn, and R. Powers. CONCERNING THE EXCLUSION OF PUPIIS WHO ARE EXPET .T Fp FROM THE CALCULATION OF DROPOUT RATES. Provides that pupils who are expelled shall not be included in calculating the dropout rates for the school or school district in which such student was enrolled. Requires a school district to annually report the number of students expelled from schools within the district. -19- SENATE BILL 93-63 Status: Passed 3rd reading in House BY SENATOR Mendez; also REPRESENTATIVE Fleming. CONCERNING EMERGENCY ABSENTEE VOTING BY PERSONS COIVru~TED IN A HOSPITAL OR PLACE OF RESIDENCE ON ELECTION DAY. Eliminates the requirement that an eligible elector confined in a hospital or place of residence on election day provide a doctor's statement in order to obtain an emergency absentee ballot. SENATE BILL 93-74 Status: Laid over for Senate consideration of revised Conference Committee report BY SENATORS Bird, Traylor, Rizzuto, Norton, Bishop, Mendez, R. Powers, Schroeder, and Trujillo; also REPRESENTATIVES Grampsas, Owen, Romero, Williams, Agler, Berry, Faatz, and Kerns. CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE X OF THE STATE CONS t i i t3TION AS IT RELATES TO STATE GOVERNMENT. Defines certain terms used in Article X, Section 20. Excludes special purpose authorities from the provisions of Article X, Section 20. Establishes a limitation on state fiscal year spending. Specifies the calculation of such limitation. Requires the department of local affairs to determine and report the annual percentage change in state population for purposes of said calculation. Specifies the base for purposes of calculating reserve increases as part of state fiscal year spending. Requires the creation of a state emergency reserve and specifies the required minimum amount of such reserve. Requires the declaration of a state emergency prior to the expenditure of the state emergency reserve. Provides for the imposition of emergency taxes by the state. Establishes requirements for the imposition of an emergency tax. Provides for the submittal of any emergency tax to a statewide vote subsequent to imposition of such tax. Imposes limitations -21- ' and the amount of general fund moneys that will be appropriated for school finance for the " next fiscal year. SENATE BILL 93-80 Status: Signed by Governor BY SENATORS Bird, Traylor, Rizzuto, Norton, Bishop, R. Powers, Schroeder, and Trujillo; also Representatives Grampsas, Owen, Romero, Williams, Agler, Berry, Faatz, and Kerns. CONCERNING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE INTEREST-FREE LOAN PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL DID i xICTS UNDER THE "PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE ACT OF 1988. Requires the state treasurer to approve applications of school districts for loans under the interest-free loan program established in the school finance act. Provides that no loan shall be made unless the district demonstrates, to the satisfaction of .the state treasurer, that the district will experience a general fund cash deficit during the month. Limits the amount of the loan in any month to a specified amount over the projected general fund cash deficit. Authorizes the state treasurer to establish the method for calculating cash deficits and reporting mechanisms. Establishes the time frame for the repayment of the loan. To reduce the interest loss to the general fund caused by the interest-free loan program, provides for the appropriation for school finance to be transferred from the general fund and credited to the public school fund in 4 installments. SENATE BILL 93-82 Status: Signed by Governor BY SENATORS Bird, Traylor, Rizzuto, Norton, Mendez, R. Powers, Schroeder, and Trujillo; also REPRESENTATIVES Grampsas, Owen, Romero, Williams, Agler, Berry, Faatz, and Kerns. CONCERNING ALLOCATION OF THE STATE'S SHARE OF SEVERANCE TAX PROCEEDS TO THE GENERAL FUND. Provides that the allocation to the state general fund of gross receipts realized from severance taxes on minerals and mineral fuels which would otherwise be credited to the state severance tax fund is extended through fiscal year 1993-94. -23- • SENATE BILL 93-98 Status: Laid over for 3rd reading in House BY SENATORS R. Powers, Norton, Bishop, Schroeder, and Trujillo; also REPRESENTATIVE Anderson. CONCERNING MA t - i t?~S WHICH MAY APPEAR ON THE BALLOT AT ELE~, i iONS TO BE HELD IN NOVEMBER OF ODD-NUMBERED YEARS PURSUANT TO SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE X OF THE STATE CONS t i t tJTION. Specifies the matters which may be placed on the ballot at state and local elections required to be held in November of odd-numbered years pursuant to article X, section 20, of the state constitution. On the state level, includes initiated and referred amendments to the state constitution, initiated and referred statutes, and initiated and referred questions on taxation and spending matters arising under article X, section 20. States that the subject matter of constitutional amendments and statutes is not limited to article X, section 20 issues. On the local level, includes parallel provisions for initiated and referred ordinances, resolutions, and franchises. SENATE BILL 93-102 Status: Assigned to Senate Education Committee BY SENATORS Wells and Cassidy CONCERNING PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Allows a student enrolled in a school that does not sponsor a particular interscholastic activity to participate in such activity at another school in the student's school district of residence or at any school in a school district that borders the student's school district of residence if the student otherwise meets the eligibility requirements for participation in the activity. Authorizes the school or the school district to charge a fee for such participation. -25- ' SENATE BILL 93-136 Status: Assigned to House Finance Committee BY SENATOR Wells POLIt;irS RELATING TO STATE-SUPPORTED INS 1 t i JTTONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO PRESCRIBE ANNUALLY THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE TL t i tON REVENUE THAT MAY BE COLLET i ~D OR SPENT BY SUCH INa t i i JTIONS. To facilitate compliance with the limitation on state fiscal year spending under section 20 of article X of the state constitution, provides that the general assembly shall prescribe the total allowable tuition revenue of all state-supported institutions of higher education for the fiscal year. Requires the Colorado commission on higher education to establish tuition and fee policies within the total allowable tuition revenue prescribed by the general assembly. Requires admission standards for out-of-state students at state-supported institutions of higher education to equal or exceed admission standards for in-state students. Requires the commission on higher education to develop an admission policy effective for fall semester 1993, which will ensure that at least 55% of the incoming freshman class at certain institutions of higher education are in-state students. Requires the commission on higher education to develop a policy for students transferring from one degree program to another on the same campus which provides that the grade point average required for transfer is no higher than that required for graduation and that appropriate pre-transfer credits earned by the student from the degree program to which such student is transferring be applied to graduation requirements. SENATE BILL 93-140 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in House BY SENATORS Ruddick and Owens; also REPRESENTATIVE Hagedorn. Provides that parents shall be responsible for their children's attendance at public school. Provides that home-based students who participate in school interscholastic activities may be counted for purposes of determining pupil enrollment upon fulfillment of certain conditions. Permits boards of education to deny admission to or expel a child for one year with adequate reasons. Authorizes boards of education to delegate to school principals the power to suspend a pupil for up to 10 days for having a weapon on school grounds. Specifies that behavior on or off school property may be grounds for suspension -27- SENATE BILL 93-183 Status: Referred to Senate Appropriations Committee BY SENATORS Owens, Trujillo, Bird, Blickensderfer, Johnson, Roberts, Ruddick, Schaffer, and Schroeder; also REPRESENTATIVES Kerns, Agler, Anderson, and Reeves. CONCERNING CHARTER SCHOOLS. Allows for the establishment of charter schools. Provides that charter schools are to be allowed the greatest practical degree of control over the operation of the charter school consistent with the constitution and statutes. Allows for application by any individual or group. Sets forth an application and appeals process for obtaining a charter and specifies the subjects tope addressed in the application. Provides criteria for evaluating an application for a charter. Allows charters to be approved for up to 5 years and sets forth review procedures. Specifies grounds and procedures for nonrenewal or revocation of a charter. Requires that annual reports be made by the charter school. Explains teacher and pupil status relative to the charter school and the school district. Provides for funding of the charter school. SENATE BILL 93-187 Status: Laid over for 2nd reading in House BY SENATORS Bishop, Ruddick, Ament, Casey, Cassidy, Feeley, Hopper, Johnson, Lacy, Mutzebaugh, Norton, Pastore, Peterson, L. Powers, R. Powers, Roberts, Schroeder, Traylor, Trujillo, Wattenberg, Weissmann, Wells, and Wham; also REPRESENTATIVES Foster, Prinster, May, Reeser, Acquafresca, Armstrong, Blue, Chlouber, Clark, Coffman, Dyer, Eisenach, Entz, George, Gordon, Hagedorn, Lawrence, Lyle, Martin, Moellenberg, Morrison, Reeves, Salaz, Schauer, Shoemaker, Snyder, Strom, Thiebaut, and Williams. CONCERNING THE EXTENSION OF THE COLORADO TOURISM PROMOTION FUND TAX. Recreates and reenacts the statutes which impose the special sales tax on tourist-related items, which tax supports the Colorado tourism promotion fund. Refers to the voters a measure to extend such taxes, pursuant to the state constitution. -29- RECEIVES Mnp ~ t 1993 . Sherman & Howard ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW Denver A Colorado Springs ~ Las Vegas ~ Reno Employment Law News Issue No. 93-1 February 1993 Sherman & Howard 0 1993 FINALLY, i ~ FANiII,Y LEAVE ACT After two failed attempts during the covered employers are obligated to pro- Bush administration, the long anticipated vide) "12 w...li+~eeks of leave" without "Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993" wages or salary during each twelve month (the "Act") has finally been enacted. The period of their employment, if the leave is Act was signed by President Clinton on for one or more of four purposes: (A) the February 5, and will take effect for most birth of the employee's son or daughter employers on August 5, 1993.' Although and care for the child, (B) the adoption or the populaz media have generally described foster care placement of the employee's the Act as legislation simply requiring lazge son or daughter, (C) the employee's care employers to provide brief maternity and for a spouse, parent, or chdd (if the chdd child care leaves to employees, at no cost is under age 18 or is incapable of self-care to employers, a number of surprising provi- because of a physical or mental disabih'ty) sions are buried in the Act. The new law when they have a "serious health condi- also fails to address a number of foresee- tion," and (D) the employee's recovery able issues and scenarios. This Employment from or treatment fora "serious health Law Update will summarize the Act's major condition" making the employee unable to provisions and note some of the practical perform her/his job functions? The implications of the Act. "pazental leaves" in categories (A) and (B) may only be taken during the child's first Overview. Under the Act, covered em- twelve months with the employee. The ployees are generally entitled to (and "serious health condition leaves" in ' The Act will Iatcr :..,-.....e effective for empbyers to the event they Gave emplayeea covered by a oouective bargaining a~..,......tnt on August 5, 1993. Those employees will be covered by the Act on Fetxuary S, 1944 or s< the termination of the labor contract, whichever occurs first. s "Serious health condition" is defined broadly by the Act to include any iWeas, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition involving inpatient care at a hospital or other medial cart facility a continuing treatment by a health care provider. The ~ r of the phrase "continuing ~ -,.t by a health care provider" is unclear. "health care provider" is defined as any doctor of medicine or osteopathy who is curl ~ ~ . . J to practice medicine or su.~...~ by tht state is which the doctor prdctioes, but the term "ooatiauing treatment," quite broad on ~ face, remains undefined in the tert of the Act.. hopefully, the Department of Labor regulations, to be pramulptcd within 120 days, will offer some guidance oa this issue. Sherman & Howard -1- February 1993 _ . ~ 'irili' ~ . , ss-ms ~ ~ ~ 'YYGci ~ - - ~ . n i eu i u ~ ~ u i . . . ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . categories (C) and (D) are not so restric- ted. It is possible, therefore, that an eligible employee could claim entitlement to a 12- F,~plo~wr Law Neevs week leave of absence annually over a is published periodically by number of years, so long as each leave was the ~mp~°ym`°t t.aw D`pa' W'-~c °f within one of the four categories enumera- s6ermaea ~ xe~a ted above. ~ i~.a. Covered Emnlovers and Emnlovees. Employers (private and public) having 50 or sreeaar et xowaed ~ ~ .-a ~ Slera more ~.+,YloyeeS (employed each workday a""" t" veer for the preceding 20 calendar weeks) are 633 sevneee.er seeeec 317 sorer her secree sv~ 3000 t~ vet,; xv 89102 generally covered by the Act. To be eligible T'" ' ` 7oz-387 for a leave under the Act, an employee T''' - • • f ~ - ~~~'0 must have been employed by her/his present employer for at least twelve months sra.~r e~ H°""d °c and must have worked at least 1,250 hours ~ ~ 9o sorer Cawde 333 Holooab Avnre during that year (calculated according to suee 1500 Sriee 300 G r . ~ . sptirp, CO 80903 Nv 89502 federal wage and hour standards). Tdeprore 71975-2140 Ti..,.., a 702-3z3-1601 Td 71935.4576 Td t' 702.348-7250 g tea Though the Act's application is quite broad, there are some limitations. Fot R"a"""` welo°'e'° °°A"'b`'° f°` °arC°°"~ ° ~ ~ - ~ exam le, workers em to ed at a worksite at we eegre.c ody era hu eeedie be pivea a ere , a.a eo P P y srea.r at xorr~a. An R ' • . which the employer has less than 50 em- ployees are excluded from coverage by the Fa decailea irEoc.aeo. or ary eneea a'. - , .1 i. tre Act if the total number of employees em- Faployse.c 1,. xe~w, please ooauet +ry .ebn of ere Faploy- ployed within 75 miles of the particular 'e'e 1"" worksite is less than 50. Thus, branch J. Marr Haim (303) 299.8444 offices and remote operations sites will be l,ee Dak ~3a3) 299-s2sz R . i M Dory (719) 475-1M0 treated separately for the coverage calcula- Jaaea G. Fieeo (303) 299332 Jaaa E Harear8er X303) 299-8214 lion. Further, ltl those increasingly common >±J;~bar 1. > c303) z99.s2/o circumstances where both spouses in a crate w. x . ~ ~ , . oMer 3o j z faml'ly are employed by the same employer, Gina H. Scrlab (719) 475-?MO ~e Act rovides that-exce t in cases of w.V. (Berrie) siebac (303) 299222 P P 299-s26s Aadrav w. volia leave taken because of the employee's seri- Drr~a webbe~ (719) 475-2410 ~ g ry wayre w. wa1;a.. (719) 475-2440 ouS health COnditio sate o above- the two spouses are entitled to only twelve weeks' leave between them in a~ twelve month period. Sherman & H.~~~,:,,J -2- February 1993 ___{._w_~,.,.v.W... y.....~.tij~ r a "Serious Health Condition" Certification. notice before the leave is to begin. Again, An employee taking leave due to the there is an exception to the notice require- serious health condition of the employee or went where the date of the treatment of a family member--categories (C) and requires less notice. In the case of any (D)-may be required to provide a certifica- leave taken under the Act, the employer lion of the condition from the treating has the right to require the employee to health care provider. In any case where the periodicaIty inform the employer of the employer has reason to doubt the validity w.r rcted remaining duration of the leave. of the certification provided, the employer may also require, at its own expense, a A parental leave in categories (A) or second opinion from a health care provider (B) may not be taken intermittently (e.g., designated or approved by the employer. September, October, December) or on a However, the designated health .care provi- reduced leave schedule (e.g., four hours per der may not be employed on a regular workday, thirty hours per w..~L.~eek, etc.), basis by the employer. In cases where the unless the employer and employee so two opinions conflict, the Act provides that agree. But an employer must provide inter- a third opinion be obtained by a health mittent and reduced schedule leaves when care provider designated or approved jointly the leave is taken because of a serious by the employer and employee. This health condition (categories (C) or (D)), opinion will be binding on both employer and the intermittent or reduced schedule and employee. The Act does not provide a leave is certified by a health care provider procedure for "breaking the tie" in the as "medically necessary." Most surprisingly, common situation where the medical the Act does not define the term "medi- opinions conflict and the employer and tally necessary." The procedures available employee are unable to agree on a health for contesting a "serious health condition" care provider to render a third opinion. certification are also available to challenge a certification that an intermittent or Scheduling a Leave of .Absence. The Act reduced schedule leave is "medically places a modest burden on an employee necessary." Employees taking medically wishing to take one of the parental leaves necessary intermittent or reduced schedule in categories (A) and (B), to give the . em- leaves may be required to transfer ployer at least thirty days' notice of the temporarily to an alternative position for intended departure date. An exception is which the employee is qualified, which has made for situations where the birth or equivalent pay and benefits and which placement of the child precludes thirty better accommodates recurring periods of days' notice. In such cases the employee leave than does the employee's regular must provide as much notice as practicable. position. Similazly, employees wishing to take a seri- ous health condition leave in categories (C) Interrelationship Between the Act and or (D) must, where the leave is based on a the ADA. The Americans With Disabilities foreseeable, .planned medical treatment, Act requires employers to make "reason- make a~reasonable effort to schedule the able accommodations" for employees with treatment so as not to unduly disrupt the disabilities, and whether a particular accom- employer's operations, and must provide modadon is "reasonable" is determined on the employer with at least thirty days' a case-by-case basis. With the new Act, Sherman 8c Howard -3- February 1993 .aL. .s , w...w.. r> ......sv " „„„y~o..~_._ ..t.~~,...o.,="""'_~-.. ".r^°'_.~,'~:...o...~ ,-~.x ~ _ ~.ro..::-~=a.r..._:.~A~56M.,._~.,.~ _ _ - ia~cwe r ti however, it appears that an employer with ployee taking leave under the Act. If the a disabled employee who requests a serious employee does not ultimately return to medical condition leave (category D) must work, the employer is entitled to recover at least provide 12 weeks of leave, which the premium amounts paid for health may be taken intermittently or on a coverage during the leave. reduced schedule if certified as medically necessary. Other accommodations may also Restoration of Emnlovment. Employees be required under the ADA. taking leave under the Act must, on their return from leave, be restored to their pre- The ADA also prohibits certain dis- vious position or to another "equivalent criminatory actions against applicants and position with equivalent employment bene- ~..,yloyees because of their relationship or fits, pay, and other terms and conditions of association with a disabled person. If an employment " The term "equivalent" is not employer were to discriminate against an defined in the Act, and we can expect employee who took a leave to care fora much litigation over the meaning of this disabled spouse, parent, or child (sate- key statutory phrase. Regardless of the gory C), the employee would have recourse coact definition that will eventually be util- under both the ADA and the new Act ized by the courts, the underlying p. ~:,.~.ise of the Act is that employers have excess, Pav and Benefits Durin¢ a Leave. As fungible workforce capacity (allowing the noted above, the Act does not require an shifting of work responsibilities during a employer to pay wages or salary to a leave) or ready access to qualified new worker during the leave, although of course hires who can assume the duties of an em- marry employers do provide such pay via ployee during her/his leave (and are wdling paid medical leave policies and the like. to assume such duties on a temporary Does this mean that an employee may take basis). a paid 6-week medical leave to have a baby, for example, and also be entitled to Further, employees cannot be d~:,r~~: red an additional 12 weeks of unpaid leave because of the leave taken of any benefit under the Act? No. An eligible employee already accrued prior to the beginning date may elect, and an employer may require, of the leave. However, the Act does not that the employee substitute any accrued require that seniority or other benefits con- vocation, personal leave, family leave, or tinue to accrue during the period of the personal medical leave for any part of a leave. For leaves taken because of the em- leave taken under the Act. ployee's own serious health condition (cate- gory D), an employer may require, under a Most importantly, although the Act does uniform policy, that the. returning employee not require the payment of wages or salary, be certified by a health care provider as it does require the continuation of em- able to return to work. ployee health coverage (with continued emplover premium pavmentsl during the ~iiehly Compensated Emplovee Exemp- leave of absence. If an employee is other- tion. The media have stated that the Act wise eligible, an ,,,...rloyer must continue poses few burdens for employers, in part unchanged the benefits provided by the because of the exemption for certain employer's group medical plan for any em- "highly compensated employees." This Sherman dt H~~..:.,1 February 1993 a..~~...r..i...r...w.~a..~~~..i.~.NS6w.»u...~.~.wiu~.S:+.~n .s.s+w~Y11~ ii ~ i ` .r..~r.SNYA'r14:~.Y..~..+~.n..~.~....a~aaa.1.,,~F:_~ _„~:..•?CS.. s. Y i ei iii - 'W .ts...ae~.~Sw• _'~festi.r~-wear"i..:.~11:pY ~w.'aY .a..,.1i~wMiiLf .VIs6Yi i ~ i i i 1 exemption is extremely narrow, however. who are crucial to an ;,u.rloyer's operations First, the exemption applies only to those are the highest compensated employees. salaried employees among the highest paid ten percent of the employees employed by Emnlovee Protection. The Act makes it the employer within 75 miles of the paz- "unlawful for acry employer to interfere ticulaz facility. Further, the exemption with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or allows the employer to deny restoration the attempt to exercise any right provided rights to such highly compensated persons [by the ActJ " The Act also contains a if the denial is necessary to prevent "sub- retaliation provision making it unlawful to stantial and grievous economic injury to the discriminate in any way against airy indi- operations of the employer," another vidual for opposing any .,..arloyer practice phrase not defined by the Act. that violates the Act. This latter prohibition If an employer wishes to invoke this protects employee conduct such as filing an exemption, it must notify the employee of agency complaint or a lawsuit against the its intent to deny restoration. The legisla- employer and giving testimom? at any pro- tion does not dictate when the employer ceedmg relating to the Act. must give such notice to the employee, Another major issue left unanswered by although we expect that the Department of the Act is whether the hours not worked Labor and the courts may interpret the Act an employee during a leave may lawfully to require that notice be provided promptly be considered by the employer for any pur- when the employer f.,~ u.ulates the intent to pose. For example, can the days missed deny restoration. The Act seems to assume during the leave be chazged against the that, if the notice is given before the leave employee under an absence control policy? starts, the employee may forego the leave When benefit plan contn'butions are tied to altogether or may discuss modification of hours worked by an employee, must the the terms of the leave with the employer. If the employer's notification is given after contributions be made as if the employee the commencement of the leave, the em- worked during the leave? Such predictable ployee must be given the opportunity to scenarios aze not addressed by the Act. return to employment (presumably with full Enforcement. To give teeth to these restoration rights). If the employee elects prohibitions, the Act authorizes a private to continue a leave after being notified of right of action filed in state or federal the employer's intent to deny restoration, court against an employer by airy aggrieved the restoration rights are lost. :,...rloyee. Class action suits aze specifically contemplated. Significant damages are One of the more sobering features of available to successful plaintiffs, who may the Act is the negative implication of the recover damages equal to any wages, bene- highly compensated employee exemption, fits or other compensation lost due to an that an employer may not deny restoration employer's unlawful acts, or in cases not rights to anon-highly compensated em- involving wage loss, a~? actual monetary ployee, even when the restoration rights loss resulting from the violation, "such as would cause "substantial and grievous eco- the cost of providing care, up to a sum nomic injury to the operations of the em- equal to 12 weeks of wages or salary of ployer." Congress seems to make the dubi- the employee." Pre judgment interest is ous assumption that the only employees also recoverable. A successful plaintiff is Sherman & H.~ ~~t~1 -5- February 1993 "~'-"a..a.rw.~..:.r~..f'-13~L.r~.-n.:.a~':s.a.:w.n}i.......idi¢x.aR_w'r~.. ~-i.r JL - i.; ~..v~.w,~ kY4CLY5Jitit~.n.as~:ti.aa~... e....- _..,.mss\:M.v~•~i.'~E.di.;..ae:. •:+.-3..-. .v •.G...i,a'.iS1e '-'~'Siiai:3 ..a. W~1¦~Y also entitled to further, liquidated damages for actions alleging willful violations, to in an amount equal to the wages and which athree-year limitations period actual loss damages awarded, and the inter- applies. est thereon. An ;,.~Yloyer may avoid this double damage provision only by affirma- Effective Date. As noted above, the lively demonstrating that it acted under the Act simply states that it "shall take effect" good faith belief that it was not violating on August 5, 1993. Does the Act apply to the Act. Equitable relief, including rein- a leave of absence commenced before that statement and promotion, are also avail- date, which is scheduled to terminate after able. The Act also provides that asuccess- that date? The Act does not address the ful plaintiff is entitled to costs and fees, issue. We recommend that, during this includine attorneys fees and expert witness transition period, employers enter into fees. agreements with their employees clearly defining the ;..uYloyees' rights and benefits. The Department of Labor is given the If the employer chooses to apply the Act responsibility to "receive, investigate, and in this transition period, the agreements attempt to resolve complaints of violations" should make this explicit and clearly explain in the same manner that it handles cam- that the employee will not be entitled to plaints relating to sections 6 and 7 of the duplicative rights and benefits under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Moreover, the Act after August 5, 1993. Secretary may bring an action in any court to recover the damages described above on Conclusion. We strongly encourage em- behalf of any and all injured employees. players to review their ~...Yloyment policies _ for compliance with the Act.. If necessary, Finally, the Act provides a general two- the policies should be revised over the next year limitations period with an exception few months so as to conform with this new legislation. F.neployment Law News is published to provide information of grnenal interest and not to grn legal advice concerning amy specifrc situation. Sherman tit Howard February 1993 . .s..sa..k~er-at;z..s-SX..~+..:xr'~J:sv?e~,::s.:~.:.::e.>:~ixt'fa_~_::a:.c:e.x...a3a:iY1 .~r'te.'~.::aa'vaui-.,.,:.::_.:..~.lt:~r:..a..:.~.r.. -~.1{.:3d~6.~t..raa.'iarititiat ~~fe f4 h~ ~ f i i~ ~ ~Ifi-++.~ 6 un~cC~: CBw~.~k, , L.~- RECEi1~ D APR ' 5 f9 ~J EAGLE COUNTY BUILDING _ 551 BROADWAY OffICE OF THE F 0 BOX 850 COUNTY MANAGER ~3 EAGLE. COLORADO 8163 I (303) 328.8605 FAX. (303) 3287207 y 1~ i :c^. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO MEMORANDUM TO: Distribution List FROM: Jack D. Lewis, County Manager DATE: April 1, 1993 RE: Eagle County Regional Meeting Enclosed are the agenda for the April 8 Eagle County Regional Meeting and the minutes of the last meeting. The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 8 at 5:00 p.m. at the Avon Municipal Building Council Chambers, 400 Benchmark Road. JDL/jd Enclosures EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL MEETING inJRSDAY, APRIL 8, 1993 AVON MUNICIPAL BUII,DING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 400 BENCHMARK ROAD, AVON AGENDA 1. Vail Valley Marketing Board Presentation "Where Its Been, Where Its Going" 2. Goal Setting 3. Discussion of Sales Tax for Transportation 4. Other 5. Adjourn DISTRIBUTION LIST: TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF EAGLE Albert "Buz" Reynolds, Mayor Bill Cunningham, Mayor Celeste Nottingham, Mayor Pro Tem Sonja Beasley, Council Member Jerry Davis, Council Member Rick Dunford, Council Member Jack Fawcett, Council Member Glen Ewing, Council Member John Hazard, Council Member Marion McDonough, Council Member Tom Hines, Council Member Larry McKinzie, Council Member Jim Roof, Council Member Roxie Deane, Council Member Bill James, Town Manager Willy Powell, Town Manager TOWN OF VAIL TOWN OF GYPSUM Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Dan Lister, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro Tem Bob Mayne, Council Member Bob Buckley, Council Member Dick Mayne, Council Member Jim Gibson, Council Member Pam Schultz, Council Member Rob Levine, Council Member John Jodrie, Council Member Jim Shearer, Council Member Chris Estes, Council Member Tom Steinberg, Council Member Elsie Roth, Council Member Ron Phillips, Town Manager Cletus Burgess, Town Manager TOWN OF MINTURN TOWN OF RED CLirr Ernest A. Chavez, Mayor Barbara Fresquez, Mayor George Sisneros, Mayor Pro Tem Ted Warren, Council Member Richard Galloway, Council Member Grace Sandavol, Council Member Karen Mason, Council Member Louella Romero, Council Member Lawrence Chadwick, Council Member Demecio Fresquez, Council Member Michael Gallagher, Council Member Gordon Flaherty, Council Member Kent Mueller, Town Manager TOWN OF BASALT Larry Gottlieb, Mayor Sharon O'Keefe, Mayor Pra Tem EAGLE COUNTY Robert Clark, Trustee Bud Gates, Chairman Patrick Collins, Trustee Johnnette Phillips, Chair Pro Tem Linda Johnson, Trustee James Johnson, Commissioner Cathy Kinzer, Trustee Jack Lewis, County Manager Tom Stephenson, Trustee . > - RECElYED APR " 5 1993 - EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL MEr, i u1G in~JRSDAY, MARCH 18, 1993, 4:00 P.M. EAGLE TOWN COUNCII. CHAMBERS MINL t ~S In Attendance Town of Avon Albert "Buz" Reynolds, Mayor Celeste Nottingham, Mayor Pro Tem Jerry Davis, Council Member Larry Brooks, Public Works Director Town of Vail Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager Town of Minturn Kent Mueller, Town Manager Town of Eagle Bill Cunningham, Mayor Larry McKinzie, Council Member Roxie, Deane, Council Member Willy Powell, Town Manager Eagle County Bud Gates, Chairman Johnnette Phillips, Commissioner James Johnson, Commissioner Jack Lewis, County Manager The Chairperson, Peggy Osterfoss, opened the meeting by asking everyone to introduce themselves. She asked Co-Chair, Jack Lewis, to give a brief presentation about the "Paradigm Shifts" video. AGENDA t t rii~I NUMBER ONE, "PARADIGM Snu+ 1 S" VIDEO: Jack reported that he fast viewed the video at a meeting in Denver. The video is about paradigms. A paradigm is a pattern or model, sets rules and regulations, and establishes boundaries. It makes us successful by solving problems within a boundary. By looking at new paradigms we can create effective working relationships and new ways of addressing issues. Ted Graver was the speaker at the meeting and his philosophy is that "government should be the facilitator as opposed to being the inhibitor." The "Paradigm Shifts" video was borrowed from Doris Allen at the Vail Valley Medical Center. The video was shown to the group, it lasted approximately 38 minutes. Celeste Nottingham commented that the missing members of the group should also view the video because events are happening faster then ever before. AGENDA i i r.~vl NUMBER TWO, REPORT ON PO ~ r.~11'IAL 1993 BALLOT ISSUES: Jack provided the group with a handout (attached) of a survey that was mailed to all Eagle County taxing entities concerning potential 1993 ballot issues. Forty-eight surveys were .mailed and twenty-five responses were received. Twelve of the responses stated "yes" to placement of one or more ballot issues. Twelve responses stated "no" to placement of a ballot issue. He reminded everyone that this survey was done for informational purposes only. Jack stated his concern of too many issues on the ballot and perhaps the issues should be looked at and the most important could be consolidated. Jerry Davis stated that persistence will probably get a ballot issue passed. Most entities will place an item on the ballot three or four times until they get enough people to support it. James 7ohnson referred to the "Douglas Bruce" theory. He also posed the question, "Are these entities thinking of cu.~~.,t sources?" Peggy indicated that perhaps a small increase would be asked for each ballot item. Another concern of the group was that the public would have to vote in two places. Johnnette Phillips stated that a sample ballot would be mailed to all registered voters. Jack suggested that perhaps everyone could agree on the most important issues and drop some of the others. Jerry Davis said it would be like having a five year plan. Peggy asked that the group allow Larry Brooks ten minutes to talk about transportation issues. Larry provided the group with two handouts (attached), one report is with FTA Funding the other is without. He told the group that because of the limited time he would only explain the "No FTA Funding" Report. The Transportation Task Force has been working on Phase One, this includes, service miles, hours, budget numbers, and a cost break down. He stated that the task force looked at the number one premise being expansion of service to areas further west, towards the Eagle County Airport and Gypsum. Jerry Davis told the group that he and Peggy had been to Washington and they felt confident that they would get funds through the "Stimulus Package." If this did happen, any projects would need to be put together a.s.a.p. Jerry also told the group that the Town of Avon was looking at the purchase of approximately thirty-nine acres of land, known as the Miller Ranch. The cost would be approximately 2.2 million dollars for a transportation facility. Peggy was pleased that this project would require only a small amount of sales tax. She suggested that perhaps the group needed feedback from the towns of Eagle and Gypsum regarding public transportation. Town of Eagle representatives didn't feel that there was much support from Eagle residents. Jerry Davis then asked two questions, "how do we facilitate people to understand the need in different parts of the county?" and "what is perceived to be worthwhile and voted for?" Peggy suggested the issue be discussed again after the survey to employees/employers in the County was mailed and the information was received. Celeste Nottingham stated the need for public transportation to this end of the valley because of the airport. Willy Powell told the group that private transporters were handling the airport traffic. Jack agreed with Willy that private transporters were handling the airport traffic at this time, but this just means an increase of vehicles on the road. Jerry Davis asked what it would take to get the public to start riding public transportation, would it be convenience? Peggy referred to the paradigm shift, we need to look ahead, not just the hear and now. Kent Mueller mentioned the Summit County bus system and the mixed reactions they were getting. James Johnson added to Kent Mueller's comment by stating that the problems in Summit County were not amongst the riders, it was the towns that were battling about who was paying a fair share. James also stated that the Eagle County transportation issue needed participation from Eagle and similar communities. Willy Powell told the group that people did not think transportation was an issue. Peggy felt that the transportation group needed to seek funds from the Federal Government and if that didn't work then go to the voters and explain to them that all efforts had been made before taking the issue to the public. An issue like this needs to be a joint effort and communities need to work together. Bud Gates said this needed to be dealt with now and should not be put off until it was in the crisis mode. Peggy thanked Larry for his transportation update 2 and asked that the group move onto the next agenda item. AGENDA t 1 ~yI NUMBER i nnEE, PRIORITIZATION OF GOAIS: Peggy asked Jack to read the twelve suggested goals from the last meeting. The goals, read by Jack, are: Combining Services, Affordable Housing, Education, Child Care, Eagle River, District Funding through Legislative Changes, Focus on Critical Issues Concerning Smaller Communities, Countywide Transportation, Communication with People at large, Regional Recreation, Joint Purchasing, and Keep on top of Goals/Issues. Some of the questions raised by the group concerning some of the goals are: What is affordable housing? How do we focus on critical issues concerning smaller communities? How does the Eagle County Airport affect countywide transportation? Would bike paths be considered under countywide transportation? Jerry Davis asked what it would take to get communities to participate in the group meetings. The meeting location determines what communities attend. Kent Mueller agreed that these representatives needed to move forward and get on board. Bud Gates liked the idea of holding the meetings in the different communities. Peggy asked what would tie a good time of day to hold the meetings. The groups agreed to change the meeting time to 5:00 p.m. instead of 4:00 p.m. Jerry Davis informed the group of the placement of a new gas line going through Eagle County and could this be an opportunity to do a bike path. Bud Gates stated that the Board discussed this issue with other counties. Johnnette Phillips told the group that Summit County was interested in expanding their bike path. Jack Lewis suggested that perhaps the group look at bike paths be a separate goal. Peggy asked that Jack send a list of the goals to all towns to be discussed with their representatives and ask that they select five of the twelve goals for consideration at the next meeting. Jack Lewis asked that everyone look at the goals and if there is something to be added, bring your suggestion to the next meeting. Peggy asked Kent Mueller to provide the group with an update on the Minturn Cemetery. Kent explained that the Town of Minturn was willing to donate land to the district for cemetery expansion, currently there are only twelve vacant plots left. However, the district needs to realize that they need to be responsible to take care of the donated land. The district has in the past lacked professional management. Currently the Town of Minturn provides water and trash service to the district free of charge. Kent also stated that Vail is now looking into having their own cemetery. You can expect to see this issue on the 1993 ballot. Peggy asked who could vote on this. Kent stated that the vote would need to be within the district. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING S~:ttr.DULE The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. The next meeting will be held in the Avon Municipal Building on April 8 at 5:00 p. m. Minutes: J.Lewis 3 _ - RECEiYED APR ' S ty~ _ GOVERNMENT EN 111 Y BALLOT FUNDING SOURCES OTHER INFO. 1'1 ~lVI Arrowhead Metropolitan Avon, Town Yes Property tax, Financing for Accommodations tax, Public Works Assessment Sales Facilityior tax, and Real Recreation Ctr. Estate Transfer tax Avon Metropolitan Basalt, Town Yes Property tax To form a special Rec. District tc offset the operating costs of a community swimming pool. Basalt & Rural Fire Prot. No Basalt Regional Library No Not until ramifications of Amend. One are clearer, maybe in '95. Basalt Sanitation No Basalt Water Conservancy No Beaver Creek Metro. Bellyache Ridge Metro. No They plan to drill a new well, but will do as funds are avail. Appears Amend. One will force dist. into dept. Berry Creek Metro. Bighorn Water Cascade Village Metro. Yes Property tax Colo. River Water Conserv. No Eagle, Town No Eagle Cemetery Eagle County Yes Property tax _E.C. Emerg. Services Hosp. No Eagle County Library Yes Property tax Not asking for monies, only complying with Amend . One -how to spend monies; i.e., new bldg., etc. Eagle County School RE50J Yes Property tax Eagle Sanitation Eagle-Vail Metro. Edwards Metro. Gore Valley Water Greater Eagle Fire Prot. Yes Property tax and Specific Ownership tax Gypsum, Town Yes Property tax Gypsum Cemetery No Gypsum Fire Prot. Gypsum Sanitation No Lake Creek Meadows Water Lionsridge Water Mid Valley Metro. No Minturn, Town Red Cliff, Town Yes Property tax Two ballot items. and Sales tax Red Cliff Water & San. District was dissolved in 1991. Roaring Fork School RE1 Property tax/Bonds Just starting for new school a facilities study & will not know until May or June. Upper Eagle Valley Con. San. Upper Eagle Valley San. -Vail, Town Yes Lodging tax and In addition to a vote on continued these items, it expenditures for is likely that capital maint. items the Vail Rec. Dist. will hold an election in May 1994, re: a mill levy "swap" with the ToV. Also, the State is likely to put the .2$ Tourism Tax onto the Nov. ballot. Vail Intermountain Water Vail Park & Recreation No Depending on the Town of Vail, we may place a mill- levy transfer vote on the May ballot. Vail Valley Conso. Water Vail Village W. Water & San. Vail Water Vail Water & Sanitation Western E.C. Ambulance Yes Property tax May need to ask and User fees for up to $350,000 to build a headquarters facility. Western E.C. Metro. Rec. West Grand School iJT Yes Property tax Will be used to generate addl. revenue to cover loss due to decreased assessed valu. of Henderson Mill (AMAX) SUMMARY: Fourty-eight surveys mailed. Twenty-five responses received. Twelve responses stating "Yes" to placement of ballot issues. Twelve responses stating "No" to placement of ballot issues. one response, "Not sure at this time." I - _ , ' RECEIVED APR ' 5 NO FTA FUNDING~~ 11511N6 TRRNSPORTRIIIR SYSiEII - - r j , - _ UUN1Y IRRNSPORiRiION SYSIEM - SE61i1V119 CAIE 2 - SI ANNUAL INCRERSE 1N EAGLE COUNTS Rl1EA$Nlt I~ ~ M! ~ : ~ NOdEC110N OF ANNUM CDS1S REVENUES AND REOUIREI SUB51 IES ~ ~~33 ti ~c .i , r r 6 ~ . a ; 3, ei `~~;f ~ , UR illE YEARS ENOiN6 DECER/ER Sl; 7993 1HROU6H~200]- nv rent rn~ncnoca ' ~ " - I.NRURRY Il, 1995 ACiUAI ~ 1491 1993 1991 1995 1496 1941 1998 1499 1000 2001 _ , 15 811~138~~.,1. 557,lBA ~ 789,139 583,891 59/,012 612,191 ~ YSIEM MILES 140 000 199 000 513 133 S2] 4 ' . ' YSIEM MPH 11.10 15.11 45.13 45,13 , ,7l.13~~~r~>°ja45~13 47.13 45,13 45.13 YS.I3 YSTEN HDUAS - '19,139 ~ - 19;593 •_.__.19;913- w;193-' ~i;01a u,74~ 22;11?"'-` "'°22,813 ?3;213 25,]93 YSIEM IIR. 6RUNiH 0 0 550 550 550 550 SSO 550 550 550 NF1RilUN 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 I,OS 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 _ - _ . _ . _ L PERA11N6 EiPENSEt ~ Y„1,' - . " ~ IlE/ (241,101 I4se,54T ~4n,173 ~ .1215,026. ?121ff~li l~~~.~1"V,~,~,,1J29~935. tiR !316,/51 !363,1)3 1111,962 ARIABIE RR1E FER NR: " f2t:IQ--__..___ 122:6 --`f23:B2 .21:01 ~ J21:fQ (30.11 °--'131.13 - - !31.52 aRIRBIE {111,690 4110,027 !115,132 (512,6/7 !552,128 !595,531 !811,235 (640,021 1712,011 6191,6'!3 ~ ANA6EMEN1 135,000 450,000 !51,500 !55,125 !51,181 (80,175 !63,111 f61,0U5 (70,355 f/3,873 EFUfl11SNIR8 RRTEIIIL-"-: -'--"--`111R N/R rO.uvu w.i2ov - w~+vsvl v~'tr : mv.+311 vv.a15: _10:1532 /d:1801 fdJ811 - ~ EFURBISNIN6 !80,000 f0 fb1,57b,~ . 166,136 f]l~b32~i -;~~I1~ 19 .!13,103 119,125 !96,172 f103,J70 ~ RPiIAL 10 to to !35,631 ' '.'i;14b1~59~,1 l38Q, ~3.',f~ 1121,798 ~ f50B,T09 150/,]09 450/,]09 ' UTAI. EIfENSE ~ 1115;191 1711;111-"`-'-1/60;881 1951;020" i1,21?;fO~ • , ~ w 1f;~31;1OY` 11;101;811 11;111,091 11;185,538 EVENUES: 1N6LE RIDE - EAGLE COUMTII- - ,y, - - PASSEN6ER5 118,250 150,558 151,063 , 185,911 111Y46]` 163Y001 H2,lSl ' 201,159 211.,111 221,139 . ~ RAZE PER PASSENGER 12.00 12.00 12.00 ,12.00 :t~`"° 12,00 ;12.00 12.00 11.00 12.00 42.00 REVENUES !292,500 !301,11! !316,181 1331,975 4311,571 1388,002 (31/,302 1103,518 4125,893 1111,811 ~ ,lN6LF AIDE - LEADVILLEI-- - _ . - . r . PASSENGERS 13,000 11,000 11,]00 15,135 t li SOT ryl3r~~t lt,~~T 11,188 11,181 19,899 10,811 Ra1E PER PASSENGER 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 { ` 1.00 ' ,ISi~O. ' N.00 13.00 13.00 43.00 REVENUES !39,000 112,000 111,100 !18,305 111,820 151,051 (53,801 156,211 !59,091 482,053 ~ 0 RIDE EAGLE COUNi>t PASS_ _ - _ PRSSES SOLD 390 315 405 115 .116. !1~~~ } ~6' .l 194 Slb 512 589 ~ ~ ~ RAZE PER PASS (30.00 (30.00 130.00 130.00 170+60 130;.80 X30.00 (30.00 (30.00 130.00 kEVENIlES !11,700 !11,582 112,110 {12,111 1l - ` - 3,311 f11,OS1 !11,]58 115,/41 (18,289 111,082 ON Y FAS : - PRSSES SOlO 1580 1311 1318 1N5 1516 1193 ' 1813 1151 11/S 1931 . ~ RaIE PEA FASS (30.00 130.00 !30.00 130,00 130.00 s 13000 130.00 130.00 130.00 /30.00 REVENUES 418,100 139,311 (11,293 (13,358 115,528 !1],602 450,192 !52,102 455,33) 158,101 ~ 01. REVENUES ALC SOURCES ' f390,000 ~f391;000 N13;700 '~'-~13i~317-"'-f/18~10, ~ a'M;18i , t70t~t55- ' 1521,91/ 155/;39/ 4513,117 s:zr:zz zsaaz:c• assm::es tssssmas s:eassn ,rt vmsag4s saasssa eszu am eoc:czcs .c-cevec • iNNIIRI SUISIDY - E11S11N6 4385 191 1351 551 1118 981' 1920 885 1161 003 ~';';~'/416 9j1 + 1l 038 118 ~ N 113 813. fl 128 891 f1 113 /2l r r r ? 1 r 1 r r r r r r r ~!ItIIIAI SUPSIDY - EIPRNOEO 0 U 157,303 315,103 336,710 385,175 319,131 391,348 138,191 152,618 ~ aaaasm:m asss:mza sezmsasa e:z:zeza aszzsszm amasaess ti:m:z:m i:i:zzz2 _:-_zzzs "11@ir 1 EVAN@!@' 715,191 `771~17i 1011!11" II/ION"~•'NII>l6jN3 !]4lll'111r~--'^-'1411819!1'^"-"' 1151!1009 i,?6q,11N1 1~118~081 1--~~tr ~ 'fie; ' :DD IRPACTS Of NEN BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY -ASSUME 1995 CONSTRUCTION AND 1496'YEAR ONE OPERAtIdNl"~ • fl{ED C051 REDUCTIONS: 391 OF ANNUAL OPERAi1N6 LERSE EIPENSE IN AMOUNT OF !122,960 (1993 DOLLRRS) 55,513 58,289 61,203 61,263 67,1]1 7u,850 ' 393 OF ANNUAL E315TIR8-TAAN5IT-FACII is ? 1, _ _ . - - - - UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE COS16 IN ANOUNi OF 132 210 U 012 '-`.~15 X64 1b,033 16,831 17,676 18,560 r ' ?~`S`:. i ~Y 10TAL FilEO C05T pEDUCT10R5-'" lu,brr ~,i^,;!~'a ~+,c.iu 81,098 85;153 ' ~ 89;110 ~ • j fi3ED CDS1 ADDI110N5: _ _ ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE ON {I:T111LL1TN1'BORD Iro¢~ - ~ ~ ~ • ' PRELIMINARI NUMBER FOR LRND, INFRA., CONSTRUC110N, DES18M' E7C. - f I . i. (NOPEFUIII ON NI6N SIOEI - 7.531 10 YEAR SERIAL DONDS ASSUMED 11Y,111 ~.~-228~12I~ ,~:8,'tl 228,111 .....218,111 128,121 . 218,121 ..I 393 OF PROJECTED RRNUR[ ~~ta ~aNer1T-FACTLIIT"-" 't U(ILITY AND MAINTENANCE COSTS (ASSUME 11.00/SQUARE FOOT 110,125 SO. F1.) 126,638 132,970 139,619 116,600 153,930 16!,626 TD1Al F13EB COST ADDlllunn uo,au as+,ra~,~i]~~+, ~ as+~y+a aor~rl0 311;121 381,0!1 389,111 rOrAl NEi FILED COST ADD, f0 10 10 '',.1228,121 f28~~101*~ ~181~2 r"''~~ {290,001 !293,613 (196,898 f300,Z31 . __e.5.-..? _zz=_zzz er7;ta ~ ~UDSIDY-EMISi. ~ EXPANDED 365,191 351,551 601,261 816,088 1,113,713 1,31/,10b 1,((5,971 1,571,009 1,662,888 1,136,067 tOTAL SU8S109 RITR.....-- 1 •.r}.. • . _ NEY TRANSIT FACILITIES /3b5,191 1351,511 1601,261 •11,011,101 ./j,40Y~~4?"r'~•;r'1111~03,~9 {1,1061/D3 11,861,632 !1,959,786 12,036,101 sszzssss asasssaz assazzss •tssbi/ tJiszRRSp ykka~es ' saaafasi szazrs: :za::zz r_s:::z: tOTAI PROJEC7E0 22 EA6lE COUNTY SALES TAI AT 5x RNRURL 6RONTH ""i1;827;b/!-`"- 15;Ooo,ur q~~w,c~l +a,aoo,aor ia,ppa,wa,7:•,~,n~a+p,~ w,.od,oio 16;190;16) - i1;lll;E1~ - `"f7,ID6;159 ~ - ~ a,~ t OF 000NT1 SALES TA3-~~ ~ - _ . _ ~EOUINED IU fUND DEFICIT 0.0)63 0.0703 O.llll 0.1913 0,2103 O.Ib03 0.2611 0.1151 0.2753 0.2123 i^~ _ _ 'a i6F .p. . i ' ~'~F:q''.;. .i a. _ _ • ~ 1 t. _ ! ~ ~ ~ , K...x~ J ~ ~naUNi OF DEFICIT ~55UMIN6 NO DEDi SERVICE IN NEM 1RANS11 fACit111 ' ~ , IASSUME il.l MILLION E ~ ~ SASH PAYMENT IN '91 i '9S ~ ADD: NEN fRCILIiY C05T5 U 0 l,lU0,000 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 U U " DEDUCT: DEBT SERVICE _......_^._.,0.-- ~ aw~i~a aiv~+~~r.:. ~ >!2R~la db?i~i ---t20~121 22D'~12! 2TD,121 IOiAI COSTS - - F' ~y?.~`~`'' ~ --~5 t NO DEBT SERVICE fS69'19I' f3'Jt'SSf-°fT'701-?6, „o v80"'fT'1~~ ~a~k~~ :1~10'~ov '11'636'SI1 ' fl'131`665......ft D08'2D3 ~•I ~ i i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ r+ i~ c: es_aase: ec_mr-a _.-_cce. -ov_co=_ _ccc.-_c l Of COUNiT SALES-TAi-' "J- a tN, i~r ~ IEOUTAED 10 FUND DEFICIT , , ~ - NO OEDf SERVICE 0.0161 0.0)01;' ; 0.3201! ? b.3101,' ,Iq„~~'~d~ ,~?~31 '•.';.0.2291 0.2111 0.2131 0.2121 - y µJF a ~ 1 . ' yy _ k ~j f~ of , ~ 1~ y ~,~~1 al. . --....-f_.-. I' k'r ~ w I '1 I . ' ' (v" 's I ~ ~ 1 . ~ ~1 i, CF.,~r~ ,`M i',~. . E1ISTIN6 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM _ COUNIY IRRNSPORTR110N SYSTEM FROJEffEO SCHEDULE OF NEM BUS RCOUISITIDNS ANB REIAIED ANNUAL LEASE PURCHASE PAYNENIS AT 8.51/10 YEAR RM8R11IR110N FOR THE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31,"19921RRDU6N~001" - . _ _ iEBRURAY 11, 1993 5rk' + ~ RSSUNES NO FEOERRE FUNDING _ COST 1993 1991 1995 1946 ~ ~ ~,~`-~1 199A, 1999 1000 100! - - "iii ,r`i<< ACDUTAE NO BUSES = 1943" - -f0----_. _.-.---f0--'-'"-~""--ZO '-fu w ~ w -fu f0 f0 f0 A000IAE NO BUSES - 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ACQUIRE 1 BUS - 1995 211,550 0 0 35,831 35,831 35,831 35,831 35,831 35,831 35,8;1 ACQUIRE 6 BUSES - 1996 ! -.1;528,068..- "~°"'0' 0"' '--'0 ~ta,~a~ T~,- jT sso, ,r, , sc+,,+~ -115;)5). n5; 75) '--n5;)5) ' ACQUIRE 3 BUSE5 - 199) i 801,133 0 0 0 ~ I1Bt7 llB,~j2 118,521 118,511 IIB,SII ACDUfAE I BU5 - 1998 280 )82 0 0 0 T a' 0; '~7 ~I' "0 f~'' i1~1B3 11,183 - I1,IB3 11,183 i ACQUIRE 2 BUSES 1999 5B9,b12 - - - 8);111 BI, 111 8),111 ACUUIRE 1 BUS - 2000 ! 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 TOIAES ~s,ha,ua >fu iu ' }aa,oaf v<oi~a~r~<~ kE~~~}+, ,.a+u,a~o ~avo,,0i ~'-f50B;709- - (508,709 - 9' n..ezxseaz saeauaasas atsassaasa ~tsaatasze 4~etaapisi .l :tsass2saSi :sass;aes .eaa..at== x...cce.== .Y ' ' : _ . ~ I i NPANDED IAANSP0AlA1lON SISIEM _ ~~~i _ _ UUNTr INANSPON1AilDN SYSTEM - SESI11V11T CASE 2 - 31 ANNUAL INCREASE IN EABLE COUNTP RIDERSN!? ~K~~lllsii.MAl) ROJECiION DF ANNUAL COSTS, REVENUES, AND REBUIRED SU891DIES OA THE YEARS ENOTNG DECEMBER 31,"1993 1HROO6lT 4001 ` - - nu rnnc /n~ncaow ~aRCH S, 1993 ACTUAL , 1992 1993 1991 1995 149b 1911 1998 1999 2000 20ii1 r3?EM NILES 0 0 111,211 228,182 228,182 ~;A} ~/j,~ 1 ~ 212,631 212,631 256,785 256,785 ~YSIEN MPH 0.00 0.00 23.73 23.13 , "'23.1 •~23`~3 ~ p3.13 25.7J 25.73 25.13 i ,rSTEM N0UR5 ~ ' " 0 0._.__..__~~-110 n,880- n;6B F r,lau 1;430 " 9;130 ~ - 9,980 9,980 ~rSTEM NA. GAONIH 0 0 0 0 5S0 0 0 550 0 0 NfIAIION 0.00 O.UO 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.OS 1.OS 1.05 1.05 I.US IPERATING EIPENSEI _ . . IIEO t0 10 125,000 132,300 ~ 130123 ~','a~ ~l1~1 {60,113 163,814 !61,005 /10,353 I~ i ~RRTABtE RATE PEA HA. 10:00 -fD:00"~ t~:B1.-__ _._~.0)'_ ~ca.[o su.~, "118:45`"" 150,10 IS1.92 f.S.32 ~AAIABLE 10 f0 1105,161 1222,04A 1233,203 1260,029 (213,030 !286,682 t31B,S12 1331,501 - _ _ i tANAG1NENT 10 10 /0 /0 /0,~ ' r ~10 10 10 10 10 iEFUR8ISHIN6 RATEIRI. 0 0 10:7400 10:1160'-' -'~-f0:l~ca •~.a.189 10:1159 " " 10.1534 fU.1608 10.1689 ~EFURBISlIING 10 10 113,709 128,789 130,228 133,705 135,391 137,160 111,291 113,339 :APIIRE f0 10 !19,333 198,666 198/666;;" 198~~86 148,666 1102,408 1101,150 1101,150 ~i ~D1AL EIPEIISE '-f0 " i<D-""-""1113;nua flvc,~+~"' ?+0,282" d~~,iur"-`1190;561 '"1531;021 f553,365 1EVENUES: 31NGlE RIDE - EABLE TO 4Rll ' j, PASSENGERS 0 0 18,230 3B/32S 19,211; ;v 12,203 11,366 16,581 18,913 51,354 RATE PER PASSENGER 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00'x,"s~~' 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 TOTAL SrS1EM REVENUES f0 f0 ` 136,500 f7b,650 ,.180,183 181,307 188,132 f93,169 177,82) 1102,118 iNNURL SUBSIOT - EIPRNDED 0 0 1S1 303 32S 103 136 710 3ft31t~3 , 379,131 397,396 136,191 /51,616 , , . azssessn zazassaa azoscsa afsazszs ttYStts C,~~ ~ fsssssss s¢zzz¢¢z ¢zzz_zcz -zzzscvz I . t 1 1,>?~ $h ~ ~ i ?E. 1 NPANDED iRANSPORiAiION SYSTEM r+ - ~ 'OUNTY 1ARN6PORTRTION 5YS1EM ,,~..k fii'~~t t •i+~; ~ ~ ~+t`d+ ~'i.~~~~~r 'AOJECIEO SCHEOULT OF-MEN liUS-A~~,..o~.~..o w...~-RECR1fD'RNNU _ OA iRE YEARS END1N6 DECEMBER 31, 1992 iNROU6H 2001 IARCN S, 1493 - . _ - ' i F RSSUMEB NO FEDERAL. iUMD1N8 ' i ~ wr , i PROJECTED ANNUAL LEASE PAYMENTS C051 1993 1991 1995 1996 1991 - 1998 1999 2000 2001 TCDUIRE NO BUSES - 1993 10 ~ ~ {0 f0 . 10 I ~ d'„ 0 ~ : 0 ~ ~0 , ` {0 f0 f0 1C8UIRE 2 DUSES - 1991 1b0,000 b ~ § NAgO' ~~,.,6~~~~Q ~"~#A~{ i ~ ~}1~~ ~~0 ~ 67,4b0 61,9b0 i7,9b0 15.353 .0•___ ..._----1 - _ tC0U1RE Z PEOPLE MOVERS' 130,vw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~COUIRE NO BUSES - 1995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~COUIRE NO BUSES - 199b 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 tCOUIRE NO /4oca - li i i . . • : { . ,•.k x` e~ f ! 8 6--------- 0------ - - - - D ~ >I a0001RE NO BUSES - 1998 , Q ~ 4 0 ; ~ ~ r ~ I~ I"'' ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 is s " }T " ~ . l9 S9S 39 190 39 190 1CDUlAE 2 PEOPLE MOVERS IbS,9li ~ 0 'I ~ . _ ~ ~ I'~.'~~~ ~ ~~p s ~ r ~ 4000IAE NO DUSES-="2000..."._.-"'_.--."~ 0 J E d 0 0 - 0 tOTALS (755,911 f0 {19,333 19B,bbb i98,bbb {9B,11b {98,666 {102,908 IlO1,IS0 /107,150 J ~ y rK Iy . T : r , ...~.I ~ I . _ - ~ ~ ib I f`' e . - ~ w I . ''.~~4tn t~ -4° i' .a ' t f r ~ L~'g+~r ~~a+ t yy 4i .i 'yiJ 113 ~ + . 1 /1 . { , a ~ . ' ~ FTA FUNDING ~ s C EI[5Tir16 TRARSPOATATIDR S15TEM- Aaouaw nua r:n runuinp:ann nuu~u:nu~~in4.a+w¦4,nu-rrn runP~no:run pan ~nnnau rnwu~~ - °ouNTr IRauSPDRTA n oN SYSTEn - SENSItI91Tr CASE 3 4i ,ANNUAL 2NCREASE IN EABIE CDUNPt R1DE8SNI!' lrctr~ns4.rE11 rRO1ECT10N OF ANNUAL CDS15, REVENUES, AND REOUIREB $U89181E5'~ s r .~R~ ~ ~ ` 1~ ' 'OR THE YEARS ENDING DECENDER 3I;"1993 +nnuwn cuD1- nu rnn~ InLntHa[J EPRUnAr I7, 1997 ACTUAL ~ 1492 1993 1991 1495 1996 1997 1998 1999 T000 2001 iYSTEM NILES 190,000 499,000 513133 .321,185 741136 55;r588 769,739 583,891 598,002 612,191 ~ 3rSIEM nFH 21.70 25,73 25.13 •25.73 2SJ3 ~ 2SJ3' 15.73 25.73 15.73 15.73 ' 3r5TER HOURS 19,839 . - . I9;Z43..`-_..-1'r;91T zu,49a c:,wa c?,aya [c;I13`"""°'"T2,693 23,203 7;,793 I` °r51E1± HII. GA01:TH 0 0 550 550 550' 550 550 550 550 550 I•;r!AlION 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 i 7FERA11!IR EXPENSE: IiED f221,801 (258,527 1211,453 1285rOT6 1299x277 A14r141 13T9r953 (316,151 (363,173 (381,962 ARIAPLE ~A1E °ER HR. " fT1:10- " `-'--(11:69 (23:81 fTS:uc fco.u (27:58' fTB:96 - ' (30:41 " (31.9' f37.ST 'ARlAELE f11B,690 (140,021 (175,132 (512,647 (552,716 (545,53( (611,235 (690,011 (702,081 (741,813 !ANAGE~ENT (35,000 150,000 (51,500 (55,125 (51,881 fb0,715 (63,811 (67,005 (10,355 (73,873 ~ ' EFURBISNIN6 RAZE/H1. - Rla ^ n{n iD:I10v w.uoy w.i~t~ iv.iaor s0:I15t " f0: U3T-~-' - (0:1608 f0:Ib84 EFUR8ISHING (80,000 f0 fb1,Sl6 ;66,438 (11,632 (77,179 ,(83,103 f89,425 f96,l71 f103,310 APITtsL f0 f0 110,856 140836 4 f40,8Sfa ' '1 1159,379 1200,861 f2B7,914 (287,911 f247,I1B ~ ?A:. EIPE'1SE " ` 3755;191"'"'-(118;99!"'-"`1901;71 s~av,vat 1a,vcc,a~a u,cui,I07 .1;SIB;966-'- fI;480;816 11;560,356 (1;603;447 INSLE RIDE - ERRLE C08NT~: . - PAS5EN6ERS 116,250 150,356 15A,083 167r9B1 17;281 183,001 192,IS1 201,759 211,847 222,139 • RAZE FER FA5SEN8ER f2.00 (2.00 " ' (2.00 (1.00 12.00 ,<r':' 12.00. ~ (2.00 (2.00 (2.00 (2.00 r'~':EIIUES f292,500 (301,111 (316,161 (331,475 (308,571 (366,002 (381,302 f103,518 (023,693 f410,878 INBLE RIDE - LERDVILLET ' - . PA55FN6EAS 13,000 11,000 11,100 1~;13y ~8~201 f1'r81T 17,868 1Ar761 19,699 20,684 RATE PER PA5SEN5ER (3.00 13.00 13.00 3,00 13,00 'a Y (3.00" (3.00 (3.00 (3.00 (3.00 "EGFrP1ES (39,000 (12,000 (14,100 N8,305 (18,620 fS1,051 (53,604 (56,180 (59,098 (62,051 • ~ RIOE EAGLE CDUNTI PASS - - PASSES 50L0 340 38S IOS ;;•421 { 1~6 ;,169 ~ 191 516 512 569 RATE PER PRSS (30.00 (30.00 (30.00 : (30.00 130.00 , 130.00- !30,00 (30.00 (30.00 !30.00 ~ v I;E'lErtUES (11,700 (11,562 (12,110 f11,747 f13,38/ (0,051 f 0,756 (15,090 (16,264 f17,PB2 • 7NTHl1 PASS: - - FA5SF5 50LD 1560 1311 1376 ,,1115 i 1518 f 1593 - 1673 1157 1815 1937 ~ RAZE PEA PASS (30.00 -(30:00 - (30.00 130.00 (30.00 !30.00 (30.00 (30_00 f30y00 .(30.00 _ -----ter--- --:a... ~ REVENUES f46,800 f39,327 (41,293 f13,358 (05,516 (47,802 (50,192 f52,10T (55,33? (58,101 • 7i. REVENUES ALL 50URCE5 (390;000 f394;uuv s~IT7vv »~y Boa s176~1v+ s17B;94~ X702;877 (511;998 - - (551;348 ~ (582,117 azz:zzza Lrrzzrzz sszzzs a e:zazzsa szsezzzz azzz=v=e ~ • IHUnL SUPSIFiv - E1ISTIUG (365,491 (351,554 (187,817 -V' 1513,70) _ 1566,168 =:.1718,196 (816,111 (951,878 (1,005,959 (1,021,829 I - ------'='rr !'!UAL SUPSIDr - ~ ' ~ ~1rFHD.D 0 0 117,836 216,110 251,807 286,812 300,198 315,069 350,414 368,926 ~ • - '1PSIOY-EX1ST. 4 EIIPANOED 3b5~09I--"-371;95, a~.,~5~ i7rtfl oII~OIS 2~Ots~6 . : sr226/308-•--1;Y67,911 1;356;133 1,388756 :r=zsr_z szzzassa szrrazsa fsssrsxs sassssss irzzsass sssrxszr _z______ _=___e=. „_e ! f ~ , y AOD IMPACTS DF NEN DUS MAINTENANCE FACIIIT~ -ASSUME Ig95 C8NST81ICT~~ l~N~ 19~~ 1~rEAq ONE GrPERA1t„;~;fr±~' ~;~'~d~x 4 ~ F11E0 COST REDUCTIONS: 34X OF ANNUAL OPERATING LEASE EIPENSE IN AMOUNT OF 1122,960 (1993 DOCLARSI 55,513 58,289 61,203 63,263 67,371 70,850 ~ ~ 3?1 OF ANNUAC EJI5TIN6~TRANSIrFACiu:? _ _ UTIl1TY AND MAINTENANCE CDSi5 IN AMOUNT DF (32,210 ~ ,11,512 15269 ~ .16,033 16,831 17,676 18,Sb0 ' TDTAC FilEO ~05T REOUCTTDRS 7v,b5a i~,aaa ~ ~ ii~1S6 81;099...._.._ . -95;153 _19;110 F11E0 WS1 ADDITIONS: R!JNUAC DEBT SERVICE OM-12:2'MlCiiua Duna ~aau~ - . _ , PRELIMINARY NUMBER FDA IAND, INFRA., CBNSiRUCT~BN~,,0ESI8Mj E1C. # (HOPEFULLY DN N16N SIDE) - 7.51/ 10 PEAR SEAIAL 8DNU5 A8SUMEO 228,12 ~ T, ~2~~12~d ~~~et22O~1~1~ ~.~T 221,121'` 228,121 228,121 228,121 ~ 3?1 OF PROJECTED"RNNUAL'-NEK"tRRNS1T`FAC1~~~~ - _ UTIIlTY A!ID MAINIENA!ICE C05T5 (ASSUME 14.00/SDUARE F80T 1 70,115 58. fi.~ 126,638 131 910 139 619 146 60 ~ " , 0 153,930 161,616 TUTAL FITED COST AODLIuna 328~au JJ\~~J7 J31r014 ~6T71v 571;)21 382;051' 399;147 - ~ M qg } ,M DIAL NET F11E0 COST AOD. f0 _ t0 f0 ' 1221,~2>~ `~,~28~]D1 4 f19~1~533,~~,~;t1'~` ~540~504 •1293,b23 1296898 1300,337 L'BSlD1-E1ISI. 6 ExFA!TOEO 3b5,191 351,551 605,651 772,111 821,015 !,015,038 1,116,308 !,267,911 1,356,133 1,388,756 rOTAC SU9St0Y NITR t _ _ - NEN TRANSIT FACICIiiES 13b5,141 ~ ~151,53~ ~ i605f65~ t_ ~~,Ot~4~291 ~~;1QM;xI~ , 14302;~~~', 11~~Ob~112 .11,561,570 (1,653,331 (1,689,043 _ rar,_ ~ea {s en. a i~g-~~r F~ .4 '~~i ~l~ftiaxsaasi+. icsis~r OTAC PROJECTED 11 EAGLE COUNTY SALES iAt Al i1 ANNUAL 6RONTH--_._f1;125;b15 Y~,a,v,~:~ v,r,aas 521. ~.i7T3r22S J,~-7pJ --,~2--:5;131;135--fb;llP;l83---1b;'19d~372---.. _ _ . • Y 4 k ~ ~ _ OF COUNTI SALES TA1 - ~ ~ ~ - ~~li1RED i0 FUND DEFICIT 0.076X 0.0111 0.1111 0.190X 0.2011 0.2331 0.2111 0.2631 0.2701 0.2611 a------- ` + T f 4! C y _ _ '-1 ~ h Sfy[' ~ y1c ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ r f • ~ ~ • _ • • < ' IUNT Of DffICIT ~UMIN6 NO OEBI SERVICE _ _ _ NEN 1RARS1[ FRCitITY iS~~ME f1.1 MILLION ~ ~ iH FR'i~'ENT IN '9A b '95 ------_-----._..r.-_-. ~ ~i ~fD: 9EN fNClt li'r C05T5 D 1,100,000 1,lDQ,ODU 0 0 0 r~ o )EBUC1: DEBT SERVICE - ~ ~ v v cca~iu cca~ ui cco~tu cca~ u, -"Z28~12I ~ T28~1?1 228,121 I '7 PERT SER~TCE f36S~191 f3St~S3i-"`"1I~TOSbS~~-- si~o~t~17J"" ~oov~oao si~un;170r~T~I79~691'"" 'f1;333;0/9 f1~125~210 f1~160~41I 1F COUNiY SALES Tpl . _ . _ - _ _ IUTAEp i0 FUND pEFIC1T : ~ - I ~ i0 DFBI SERVICE 0.0761 0:0711 0.3332 > 0.Sl9Y 0.1621 0.1921 0.2051 0.2251 0.2331 0.2321 • vsr.. _srrrrrz--.-•..- rzz: ___xrzzz-^-- __-x~rrs- • - - _ • i • • • • q I I . ~ I~ _ _ ,1 • ~ IISiRl6 TRAhSFORTATION SYSTEN ~ ' ]U'!iV IR4NSFOR~ATION SYSTEN tO•IEC{ED SCHEDULE OF HEM BUS ACQUISITIONS AND RELATED ANNUAL LEASE PURCHASE PAYMENTS Ai 8.51/10 YEAR RMORTIIR7fON 4R THE YEARS ENO1N6 DECEMBER 31;-1992-1NRO~JBN~OU ~ - - ~ ARCH I1, 1993 • _ - ~._e..._ _ . I~ ASSUMES BOX FTA FUNOIN6 fOR YEAR ROUND ROLLING STOCK COST 1493 1991 1995 1448 „ ~ 497 1498 1999 2000 2001 + i 'G'J1FE '.O !(USES - 1993. SO __.._.f0.._~.____.__.'i0 `fv i6 Z6 30---'_.__._f0 •f0 t0 :0. 2!!: K 6 RUSES - 1494 216,540 0 40,856 10,856 10,856 10,856 /O,BSb 10,856 44,856 0 . OIJIRE NO BUSES - 1945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y V ~ V V t V ~ .__..D ~ 0 0 :QUIRE NO RUSES - 1996' - _ :pU1RE 3 BUSES - 1497 ! 802,233 0 0 ,r 0 -.p 11~,82~ ~ 6,912. 118,522 118,522 118,522 ~ :QUIRE 1 BllS • 1998 280,782 0 0 , p 0 ' _ 6. '•41,483 41,183 11,183 11,183 :DUIRE 2 BUSES 1999 599;612"'°__..___.__.__._.._.~_,..__ A1;111 - 81;1t4 87;114 4:!:~E !PUS - 2000 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~i 0 TO1AlS -fI;949~I9T sv i~V~tl70 ~1Vitl70 :~4Y~tl70 si~~To.. ,s2Gv,ooa ~c8~;9Y4 --f2B7;971~-~'~--'f147;i18 .s ssa~=ate n=a~asssa :aoxanx:as" - xsaax ~irf. ....zsz3., csa_er..cn • 9 f i • I • i . ~ ~ z LAY ''(r~~,~ ",fist ~~tc S ~ ri` ~ ~ • I~ . f~ „ APAMDED TAANSFORTAiION SYSTEM - - • oUN1Y iRA~ISFORiRTION STSTEM - 5E5111V1i~ CASE 1 - 31 ANNUAL: INCREASE 1N ERSIE COUNTII R1DEg5N1P (ecE~>,ns2.wk11• - ~ ~ AOJEC110N OF ANNUAL COSTS, REVENUES, AND REQUIRED 5UB5IOlE5 ~ ~ _ _ OR teE rEA;S Eu0[NG OECE!IBER ;t,-1993 tHROUGN 200! - "NQfARE7NCREASES " - - - 'r.1~CH 5, I pCIUAL 1992 1993 1494 1995 1996 1991 1998 1494 2OU0 2001 YSTEM MILES 0 ~ 0 ~ 114,241 228,182 228482 212,631 242,634 242,634 T56,185 256,185 " ~ 151EM MFH 0.00 0.00 29.13 25.73 75J3~' 27,)3 25.73 T5.73 T5.73 25.13 751EM HOPRS 0 _ 0 _ -._..~~910-" o~T1B0-- o;88u 9;130-- -'.._..9;030.... 9,930 9,4°0 9.480 YS!Ef! NR. GRO~IlH 0 0 6 0 550 0 0 SSU 0 0 IIFLA11011 O.UO 0.00 1.05 1.-05 1.05 1.U5 1.05 L 05 LOS 1.05 iFEFA11tIG EXPENSE! f ; !zeD f0 f0 (25,000 152,500 (95,126 • 3SI,BD1 60,115, fb3,814 (61,005 (10,355 " ~ . '.~RlARLE RA1E FER HR. f0.00 - ..-(0:00""' 123:E2-'~ f27:QI-_ r26.co 127:57+~" 68:95..".'._ ('0:10 ('1.42 13:.52 ul:I48LE fn fU (105,161 1222,098 (233,203 (260,029 (273,030 (286,682 6318,512 (331,501 'nrIpGEMEt!1 f0 f0 ~ f0 f0 f0 f0 ' f0 f0 f0 f0 ' ~ s. .":rF'.SI{(t!G RA1E11i. 0 ._._._.._'..0._..___...t0:I200 .v:I266-'-"'-"`i0:i323 10:1389"'-"-""10:1159 (0.15'2 fP.16O8 (0.1684 EFUPPISHING f0 f0 (13,709 (28,789 f30,228 f33,705 (35,391 f31,160 (11,294 (13,359 AF11Al f0 10- 19,867 (19,133 f19,7~3 (19,713 (19,133 (20,592 (21,0;,0 (21,430 ••Ol. E1IT'FitSf_ ""f0' ._+"..f0-._. __f25f 3S6- ~ca i~J---"f3311`28v fS7f`S1f ~S9D'T30---1408;218 f94D;30i !469;995 EVEIIUES: INGLE RIDE - EAGlE 10 VA1l - - PASSENGERS 0 0. 1A,150 36~3T! 1QF2S! > 1~~253 ~~1386 16,5114 18,913 51,359 ~ AAIF FEA PASSENGER (0.00 (0.00 12.00 (2.00 (2.00 {2.00 (2.00 12.04 f2.O0 (2.00 ^!At. SYSiEn REVE111JE5 f0 f0 (36,500 (16,650 (80,183 (84,507 (88,732 (93,169 f91,827 1102,718 ~ i IHUAL SUBSIDY - EIFANDEO 0 ' 0 l17,93b ::216,170 25;607 2(16;9~2 ~ 300;198 315,069 350,174 3bb,926 ~ e.eansee =ssr_eaa ssszsr_s "e&sasssa aesaamsr taeasams' ~ sasec_s __esee~e e.oeeoes .cooc.co _ - 1 . . ' - . ( i I ' I . , , x PANDEO 1RRN5PORTA110N SYSTEM ~ , rti ~ UgTY TRANSPORiRT10N SYSTEM ~~r !i s.,i} ' 1 iikl }}~~t~ A1~+~ib~.. ~ ~ iF, ~ Il`"";fi i `~-•°x',` r OiECiEO 5CREOU[E OF NE9 905 ACOOI,r, ~ ~ o i,~ „ nc~nrcu nnaun~ ccnae rrln~rrli~c-PRYiR'N - • • - • - ~ • - - - _ ~ , IR lUE YEARS EttDIN6 DECEMBER 31, 1992 iNR0U6H 2001 iFCH S, 1993 ~ , ASSUMES 801 FiA FUNOIN6 FDR 1~A9 RDUNB ROI~.tN6 ~1~~ • ~ _ PROJECTED RNNUAL LEASE PR9MENi5 „ , COST 1993 1991 1999 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 7001 DUIRE 110 D05ES - 1993 f0 f0 ;0 ; t0 ~ f0 # 0. 20X.1 1 BUSES - 1991 9Z 000 ~ 1 t {~j~ ~ ~j 1~ } t0 f0 t0 t0 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I96' ~ X41 '~l~ ~4 ~ is ~ ~ii~9 ~fi~F j~i91 13,592 13,597 13,592 D.:oz 1 Z FEOf'LE MOVER "-2b~000•- v 3;07, o, h, ,ha ~ , 1 b, {1t '~~Otl ••__.._.0_... ..0.... • 3UIRE NO BUSES - 1995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QUIRE NO FUSES - 1996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OU?RE NO BUSES - 1997 v u rr r ~5~~:• ~1 ~ v< ~ r 0-- 0 0----- . QUIRE NO BU5E5 - 1948 ~ ~ 0. i0Z z 2 PEOPLE MOVEA 33 ~ 183 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ bq ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ r ~ ~ 4 . 3, 419 7, 839 7,938 0 ~ ~ 0 0,._ 0 7UIFF NO BUSES = Z0o0' v v v ~ OtA[S _ 1151,183 t0 (9,961 fi9,733 119,733 119,733 119,733 f20,S82 (21,130 121,130 t ~ s+;* s f~ yf d > r~, ~ 4 t • i 'T i `i " ^ . • . . t>+> ~S p t ~ ~"`'f ~ ~~3Pt~.i~ n . L . . e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ' k t y X C ~ ~t,vc. i y 8. G ~ 6~" ~ , M INVERNESS DRIVE EAST DENVER OFFICE BUILDINGS A 3c B (303) 799b826 DENVER, COLORADO eD112 ~T~ r ~ ~O• FAX (303)7996926 P.O. BOX 13t (~1 ~ l OAANBY OFFICE GRANBY, COLORADO eo446 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (303) eel-x493 MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS March 15, 1993 Dear Elected Official: I have enclosed an article I prepared for the Denver Post stressing how important it is for the Board of any local government, or other organization, to be involved in the auditor selection process. Please review the article and contact me directly if you have any questions or concerns. I can be reached at (303) 799-6826, voice mail extension 13. Sincerely, BONDI & Co. ~ert R. $ondi, CPA Partner Enclosure B Affiliate Offices Worldwide Reprinted from The Denver Post, 2/1 /93 Does auditor selection ro cess p need examination By Bert R. Bondi _ Is the fox watching the chicken - coop when it comes to management selecting the auditors that oversee the financial-statement fairness proce- dure? With the accounting industry facing renewed controversy and Big Six firms f' facing multimillion-dollar settlements governments. Sometimes a subcom- in response to investor lawsuits mittee of the board of directors, called " , charging negligence and, some say, a finance committee or audit commit- , fraudulent accounting practices, it's tee, is selected to do this job. , clear the auditor selection process Often, however, boards of directors needs to be examined. are delegating this responsibility to Certainly, we rely on experts for staff people. Those staff people are financial and medical advice. And in generally performing the work that is the accounting area, we rely on the being audited. Even though most major difference between audit firms credibility of auditors to let us know organizations can point to an official is not the type of opinions they issue that our favorite nonprofit/ charitable resolution in the board of directors' on financial statements but the accom- organization is spending its money in minutes that indicates the board panying subjective letters that indicate accordance with prescribed guidelines selected and appointed the auditors, where improvements can be made in and reporting it within accepted the real-life situation is that staff the organization. Firms hired by staff accounting principles. people selected the firm they desired people tend to omit or minimize any We rely on those same auditors for and recommended that firm to the subjective recommendations about the financial fairness in publicly traded board for ratification. organization. Firms hired by the companies, whether over-the-counter Q: What is the problem with staff board of directors tend to freely offer startups or New York Stock Exchange selecting the auditor? constructive advice on how systems, organizations. We also rely on third- A: Staff have a tendency to want procedures and financial operations party independent accountants to to select an auditor that will report can be improved. This gives the board audit the local governments we give good things about their work. This of directors the opportunity to address tax dollars to. This important third- tendency can lead staff to select an these specific items. party oversight may be compromised auditing firm that will be easiest on Q: Who really cares if an auditor more than we think. them, rather than fair. is selected by the board or staff? Financial vice presidents, con- Q: What is the risk of allowing staff A: Anyone receiving audit reports trollers, finance directors and other to select a qualified CPA firm? should. Regulators are becoming very individuals who head various organ- A: The primary risk is not receiving interested in how the auditor selection izations' accounting departments full disclosure of items that should process works. The General Account- often are more influential than they have been brought to upper manage- ing Office of the United States should be in selecting the independent ment's or the board's attention, If staff government is concerned that recent auditors who conduct examinations of selects the auditors, the auditors can bank failures went undetected longer these various staff people's own owe allegiance to the wrong person in than necessary because management accounting work. the organization. Auditors should report of the financial institutions controlled Here are some questions and to, and owe their allegiance to, the board the auditors more than they should. answers about relationships between of directors. This makes the auditor The federal government's solution to accounting firms and their clients. much more independent. This may not this is to do away with independent QUESTION: Who should select the occur if staff is doing the selecting. third-party auditors and replace them auditors? Q: How do investors and other with employees of the federal govern- ANSWER: Boards of directors constituents know they are receiving ment. Several government regulators ultimately are responsible for appoint- a truly independent audit? share this view. ing auditors in any organization. This A: It is difficult. Generally, qualified is true of publicly traded companies audit firms concentrate in a specific Burt R. Bondi, cPA, is the senior partner qJ' BONDI & Co., Certified Public Ac•countunts of any size, financial institutions, industry and "police" themselves and Management Consultants, 44/nverness Drive nonprofit organizations and local regularly on quality control. The East, Englewood, C080/l?, (303) 799-6826. Acs i , VAIL JUNIOR HOCKEY CLUB ow~~~a - x~: P O BOX 2981 VAIL, COLORADO 81658 Q~ly(~:~~ Date: April 1, 1993 RECEIVED qpF ~ ~ 1993 To: Town Council of The Town of Vail RE: Dobson Ice Arena Operations From: Craig Denton, President, Vail Junior Hockey Club Dear Town Council: On behalf of the entire Vail Junior Hockey Club I will be very candid in saying that Tim Heber, Rink Manager and Rob Robinson, VRD Director have made this a very enjoyable and trouble free year for our club. Their efforts as administrators for the arena should be strongly commended. The rink in our opinion has been operated at a very high level of efficiency and in a cooperative and fair manner towards all of the users of a complex multi-use facility such as "Dobson". I freely admit I was on the selection committee involved in Jim's hiring and have since become a close friend. I feel although, I can put aside any biases and personal feelings and easily say that in the past eight years of being involved with the club, of which 5 years was spent only as an observer, that I have never seen the arena run as professionally, and by someone with as much experience as Jim Heber. The combination of Jnn Heber's ice rink, special events and negotiating experience and Rob Robinson's recreational background have greatly enhanced the viability of the rink finally being used more for ice related activities in conjunction with occasional non-ice events. One doesn't have to look too hard at the results, of less than a year, of the increased use or numbers by our club, skating club, learn to skate numbers, camps and other programs to see the success of this management team. I hope for everyones sake, especially the youth of this valley, that we can continue on the successfizl path we all started last year by utilizing the talents of Jim Heber and Rob Robinson to run the best ice facility in the State of Colorado. Please, let us not let personal politics and ego's interfere with recreation and the important role it plays in the development of young children and athletes. Sincerely, 'g enton ~,~CE~~Ep .APB; _ 5 t99~ Alpine Spring has sprung. The grass has riz. Garden I wonder where our members iz. If it's SPRING... they'll be at our ANNUAL SPRING LUNCHEON for Volunteers and New Members Join us and learn how you can help the Alpine Garden as a volunteer. Wednesday, April 28, at 12:00 noon at the home of Helen Fritch 183 Gore Creek Drive, Vail (Penthouse of the Sitzmark Lodge) R.S.V.P. Maureen Shapiro (926-3510) or the VAG Office (476-0103) Directions: The Sitzmark Lodge is located in Vail Village at the corner of Gore Creek Drive and Willow Bridge Road. Please park in the Transportation Center. It is convenient and FREE! ...ALSO... Join us at the Gardens Monday, May 17th at 9:30 A. M. WORKSHOP: TECHNIQUES OF GARDENING PLANTING & TRANSPLANTING Questions?? Call Nancy Rondeau, Volunteer Chair, 476-4688. "Old-timers" (i.e. experienced gardeners) Come for Spring Cleanup Day on May 10th at 9:30 a.m. (The Town of Vail Cleanup Day and Community Picnic will be Saturday, May 15th. Your volunteer time earns MONEY for the Alpine Garden! And it's fun!! Call the VAG Office, 476-0103, if you can help.) 183 GORE CREEK DRIVE VAIL, COLORADO 81657 303-476-0103 _ - ~ ~U~y 28-3Or ~ 993. 1$th Annual Colorado WaterlNo~rk'shop , ~ - ws ' _ " ~ Western State Colle e . S _ (y/'1]' T~]yA~ ,Gunnison, Colorado 81231 3 ~ 4 - ~.:-<Vl/ater` ualit~ Goals:Challen e:A enciesao Q Y g . g, . Do More with Limited Resources _ `~:~`°^'~'';~Th~e''latestfromthe-Clinton"administration~;~:i:'''..~:" ~ ~,"~'~`r; Reauthorization of the Clean Water Aet= and:. - Safe Drinking Water Act - 'y~;;: _~i== . ~'t- ~ Watershed-based approaches , ~ w; ~ r xy: ~ s~-, t y r ~ ~s Environmental/13usmess partnerships ; . ~ ; . Registratron;n~orr aeon ~vill,b~ m~l(ed In early~June~-~-~ . 'br _tnf ~tia I ~ l;u . I-lt h (3~ 43 ~ 6 ~.p ~dp.~PApSTgGt°'~ x: N''`d'ave',' eY`.e f}fi1~, 3~~Y+tS3i ~ ~R~.'S"^'d Ss?~r-~j$r t`i^ r~I1'' ~V v`+~'°Yry,. t r p t y _ ~,u, w .n~.c ba. GUNNISON"CO ~ '.'303'';'~,~. `r z x f - t .PERMIT Nbn~... .~j '~twA'7 c.c d ~ x n' " ,F tr.. r .Colorado Water Workshop ;.~kr'"' x ~ f .:t r , . ter`- ~ : a ColoradoWater'Workshop '<•"'y ~ "'Yt~' S`~~9~" I ,Western Siate College w~Q ~Ar~~ ; RE.CE Gun»ison, Colorado 87237 - i - - RON Yk11i-1-iPS ~ X C : ~,u.u.~ F` ^'`a~:: ~ ~ - TOSVN h1:1N.~RE12 171 1 , , , ! ~~}F ,.r~ ~ .r r ~ Kyle-4-Wx/` 75 y-RRONTACE ROAD~~ll}{f~' ~?!,G{/ ur Yfi[L CO S1ti57-0000 ~ d ~ (JY N IVµ IRS ~ s_'~,wy`.-'~":JSi k'~ 4'a ti.~ .:r ffFF~~ J~ ~T~i y'- tt+i" ~f~~ ~t~i.Z r v f { . lotKath ccn Stroia, heaat~noxr~'for s owla• ~ set starteu ~t4tt~rri~tCti?t~rtlt+~Girat yv~gt " `Vtcario missed :on a backhand a~t~~`~~ar~'~Sl`~'VY'tllM tf~lr r the WTA, said Graf's injury would :The•Spantard took advantage of tempt. Howcver,.Graf twice'fatled" ` ,ra,F:~ +«tt~, ~r~~,~r " , ' . bc~ ~rcasscsscd. in a .couple of.;.days : Graf's poor serving; carly,,.brcaking to finish the set, the first time push- PHOENIX (AP) ; - • Marto' Andretti :became the oidcst man • ~ ~ but expected her to.be ready for her' her in the third gamc.on`'the way to ing a backhand shot wide left, and , • ~ nex! tournament, t^. Hamburg,;Ger ,;a 5-3:'lcad.. That's:. when Sanchez .then sending an.easy forehand try ever to win.an Indy-car race, taking adva f some wall- of ) R ~ ;many, bcgtnning Apri] 26 . Vtcario,startcd to,fattcr:~ into the net. ntage o banging by PH NIX (AP esuns of , _ _ day's Valvolino 200 Indy-car race, ` - ' other drivers to ,come up with. his starling posillon in paroMhe r first V1Ctory In:dearly five years in resideneo or country, type of car, completed, reason out it any, and , ~ y a, a;r~:: ~ ~ ~ ,Sunday s Valuoltne'•200 at Phoenix r ~ ,7~ oar's average speed mtlos per hour r~ f ~ ~ International Raccway:~~ . _ t, ~ 2) Mario Andretti, Nazareth, • : ~ ~ ~ Andretti,'S3,,took the checkered Lola•Ford Cosworth XB, 200, tea r a, .f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ gagfor; the first Gme since a victory . co wo tnszsais96 s5e~e~J rimy va: ` . Y' ~ ~ = ? - ~ •-:'in `Glcvcland,.iti 7uly..1988 ,and be-.. - Discrnrery Bay. Nev., X992 Lola-cnevr ~ ~ ! . i` • A, t97. 4, (13) AI Unser.Jr., Albuquer COI~iTRA:C~'TURS_ ~ AR~.~.T.~CTS .,came;"lhe first driver:.to wtn races in - fo dcc cs The revto 1 es ~ a cnety oiei c •lss.(s~ . F i, - . ~ _s ,s _ • ItLal~y is i'' ~ , r ~y 4: ~ ~ 4 ~j ~ - ;Indy-cai• ad whiner p:was USJohnny, Luyendyk, 'Netherlands, Lola- t ~ t ~ ~ Cosworth. XB, ,195. 7; (15) Scott Pr 'Rutherford,': whowas .48 'when ate ; 'Crystal Bay, Nev, 1991 Lola-Chevron Y won the,1986 Michigan 500.• ~ t9a. e, 22 Dave Kudrave, Los Angi O . , ' - 1~ , -k C4N,STitpUCTIUN SEASON; '~3.~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ { - . ~ . ,Paul Tracy of Canada'appcared to tss2 lea-Chevrolet-A. ~s3, s, (tt) t ~ ~ ~ O h ~ Smith,- McMinnville, Ore., 1991 Pen FF. ~:ME ~ (NG - eve the 200-lap race in the bag;~~r• -cnevrotet=B, t92: to; (t7) Hiro ' ~ , ' , ~ ~ lapping the rest of the 25-Car Geld • sushita: Japan, Lola-Fad Cosworth , s;'DlSCUSSIOi'~ RE,~4,RDtNG~~ by nts.42na;trtp around:ahe one- _187. ~ ^ • ~ tt, (24) Marco Greco: brazil, 1992,1 mile oval, and extending the margin ~ nav let-A t (25) R n . ~ , ~ ~ ~ { a . ao more than -two <„laps over' ,Canada, 1992 Lola-Chevrolet A ,83, . M PCB RTA~'~ ' ~ ~ teammateEmerson' Fitapaldi Just •121) Lyn st. James, Daytona Reach,', " ' -~CHECICP08NTS. D~JRtNG, . t992Laa-Ford Cosworth X8, 179. t4 „ ? ` • past the halfway point. ~ Emerson Fntipaldi, Brazil, Penske-CI ' Tr ~hl rotet-C, 171, sash: 15, (4) Roh 7 ~ , 7`~-iE :CONSTRUCTI~N.~Prt4CE.SS ,a~y,trYing,for rstI dy uerroro,.San Juan Capistrano, C •`vicl ' ' ~ ,t : ~ , { " 0[y, spun,and hit the wall-as he 't.ola•chevrolet-c, t62, wheat Dearin~ • ` : t H1 ; , lt•iCd pass the a d Cat 0 o5i Paul T acy, anada, Penske- 'Jimmy Vassar on Iap1162 giving up r c - Lazier, Ya161,tColo~1991 Lole-Chaco , , : - : x,. , < . ~ the top spot. to Fittipaldi, who then , A, 147, header. 18, (20) Robby Gor ' ~ crashed moments after the green ° 'orange,' caul., Lola-Ford Cosworth ' •T~-IURSDAY rRIL 8TH ~ ~ (tag waved again on lap 172. , % -134; crash•:t9, (23) Robbie Buhl, Gr Point, Mich.; 1992 Lola-Chevrolet-A, • ~ ! ' Andreut,.who had been three laps'. neade~. 20, (t) seen Goodyear, can , ,behind brfore:Tracy's sudden dcpar-• Lola-Ford Cosworth•.XB, toe, van: . .TOWN. O F,~ UAI L M U N 1 C 1 PAL . K; : lure, found •himsclf in' font after Fit-'• • s~ 2i," ~tg) `Stefan Johansson, sw< k ' S B.:U I L[~ I N G.:< ~ • • tipaldi's mishap, with more than a : tssz Penske-chevraet-c, 97, uan ' Sion. 22, (7) Bobby Rahal, Dublin, ` - ..lap lead on runnerup Raul.$oesel of CO U N C I L C HAM B E RS p..• :brazil. - : ; . ~ o nyeSu liven, A pear( ` The .cast 17 laps were run under • Lola-cnevrolet-Ct 4t, throttle. 24, } ~7 5 S . F RO NTAG E', ROAD '-V(/E~ST ° ~1;e` teen na and Andretti cruised ~ Eddie... Cheever,. 'Aspen, cote., g g .Penske-Chevrolet•B, 38, vibration to the Slst vtctory of his illustrious`` (t2) sc~a Brayron, Coldwater, nnid,. ' ~ 'career, second 'only to the record 67 Ford Cosworth xB, 3a, electrical. ~ • " - Time of race: 1 hour, 36 mi • # - .ti-., ~ ~ + ~ A, t. , 53.630 seconds. Margin of victory: 2 r ~ ~ ~ S po n o red : by ~ the` Town of Vc~i i I °f "I ,1~Cake"em anyway I can gct'~ sewnds. Caution tla s: 4 for 37 - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 'cm," the gleeful Andretti said.'"All' I ~ad.changes: 4 among 3 drHera ceders: Andreiti .t-10, Tracy 17-16 ' ~ AI I are We i c o m e ~ ~ ~ the credit oes to the team thou h + 1 e g tipsdi 182-171,Andretti 172.200. • ~ , ; ~ _ ~ ~ They made great pit stops and he ' arras point leaders: Andrettt 3. Cat' WSS CfCCt all da Bowel and Nigel Mansell 21, Luy ~ y 19, Fittjt,)aidi 17, (Ge) Fabi, Gordc FCC R.. M O R E -1 N FCC RMATI O N CALL 4 7 9-213 8 "rm absolutely elated: This was Vassar 14, Unser 12, Rahai 8, (tie) a tong time coming." and eheever s. ' : WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP April 2, 1993 Page i of 2 ' TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 11119 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES LARRY E./TIM D.lJIM C.: What can be done to make these Locations for the newspaper boxes have been determined and approved uniform and locations less prolific? by all TOV departments. Staff will talk to Larry E. to determine if voluntary agreements or an ordinance outlining locations are appropriate. Larry E., Tim D., Jim C., and Kristan will re-schedule a meeting with newspaper vendors. SIGNS AT VAIL ROAD & MEADOW GREG: Appropriate sign(s) on Vail Road to preclude right- "No Through Traffic" sign is currently posted. Problem appears to center DRIVE hand turns onto West Meadow Drive for traffic that does not at the 4-Way. Public Works is struggling with the issue but will fix the need to be there, i.e. "right-hand turn will lead to dead end; problem. "They" promised. dead end on right turn; no authorized vehicles, etc." 1992 02/17 EXTERIOR LIGHTING KRISTAN/ANDY: Draft Ordinance. Larry E. will meet with attorneys representing Ibarra and Kravis. He will further explore the areas of non-conformities, tree lighting, and number of lights. Will report back to Council. 08/25 FOLLOW-UP WITH BUCK SHRADER PEGIPAMILARRY G.: Mr. Shrader has called to find out Larry Grafel will write to Bob Baker, attaching responses re: two issues, (CDOT)IJAKE BRAKES/SPEED whether there has been improvement on the maintenance i.e., jake brakes and speed limits. Larry G. will continue to "reason" with LIMITS ON VAIL PASS for the west side of the bike pathNail Pass. Although CDOT. Larry G. will write to Bob Baker. CDOT has stepped up efforts to clean and maintain, their efforts have not been consistent, and this was communicated by Pam. 09/08 1041 PLAN LARRY E.: Barbara Green has asked whether the Town of Larry E. will further research and perhaps provide alternatives. (request: Steinberg) Vail has a 1041 Plan. 11103 UNPLATTED LANDS AS MIKE MOLLICAIJIM CURNUTTE: Have we followed-up Forest Service reviewing LOA work. Jim Curnutte and Mike Mollica have DONATIONS with contacting owners of parcels that may be given to TOV compiled a list of properties. Letter to property owners mailed by 3/23/93. (request: Steinberg) as gifts -understanding we are still moving through the LOA process. 11110 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 418/93, from 5:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M. at the Town of Avon. Everyone but Rob and Bob: Remember to prioritize County-wide goals! April 2, 1993 Page 2 of 2 02123 EMPLOYEE HOUSING ORDINANCE ANDYlCAROLINE: Through PR efforts, enlighten the public Andy had a TV 8 appearance on Tuesday, March 23. PR re: their opportunities to provide affordable housing. (request: Lapin) 03/16 TREASURER'S REQUEST FOR KRISTANIMIKE M,ILARRY E./PAM: Schedule work session ASSISTANCE with Sherry Brandon to discuss collection of property tax collection at the time of plat recordation. 03/16 AMENDMENT 1 COMMUNICATION CAROLINE/STEVE B./STEVE T.: Develop timeline and STRATEGIC PLAN plan to reach all "organized" groups within the TOV as well as general publicldevelop education tools for group representativesladdress issues through elections prolcon piece. 03123 ORDINANCE FOR PRIVATE SNOW- GREG/LARRY E./LARRY G.: Researchlassess whether PLOWERS additional restrictions might make sense to govern private (request: Steinberg) snowplowers. I I I I VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1993 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the March 2, 1993, and March 16, 1993, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes. 3. Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance making supplemental appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Police Confiscation Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, and 1992 Bond Proceed Fund of the 1993 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein; and setting forth details in regard thereto. 4. Performance and Conference Center Demand Analysis. 5. Appeal of DRB's March 17, 1993, decision approving the primary unit at 784 Potato Patch/Lot 15Nail Potato Patch. Applicant: Loper Development. Appellant: Andy and Lucinda Daly and Mr. and Mrs. George Wiegers. 6. Appeal of a PEC approval to allow a Type II Employee Housing Unit to be constructed on Lot 41/Glen Lyon/1210 Westhaven Lane. Appellant: Kristen Blume. 7. Vail Town Council appeal of a DRB decision re: final design approval of the Spraddle Creek Subdivision, located to the northeast of the Main Vail I-70 interchange. Applicant: SBC Development Corporation/Emit Rothlisberger/Jay Peterson. 8. Final Plat review of the Spraddle Creek Subdivision, located to the northeast of the Main Vail I-70 interchange. Applicant: SBC Development Corporation/Emit Rothlisberger/Jay Peterson. 9. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:WGENDA.TC NAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 1993 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 7:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 7:35 P.M. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the March 2, 1993, and March 16, 1993, Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes. 7:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1993, an ordinance making supplemental Steve Thompson appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, the Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Police Confiscation Fund, Heavy Equipment Fund, and 1992 Bond Proceed Fund of the 1993 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1993, on first reading. Background Rationale: At the March 23, 1993, Work Session, Council approved a list of rollforward and other expenditures for supplemental appropriation. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 8, Series of 1993, on first reading. 8:00 P.M. 4. Performance and Conference Center Demand Analysis. Steve Barwick Cliff Gardiner Backaround Rationale: The VVP&CC Finance Committee will recommend a firm to conduct an analysis of the likely usage of the proposed Vail conference facility. 8:10 P.M. 5. Appeal of DRB's March 17, 1993, decision approving the primary Shelly Mello unit at 784 Potato Patch/Lot 15/Nail Potato Patch. Applicant: Loper Development. Appellant: Andy and Lucinda Daly and Mr. and Mrs. George Wiegers. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify DRB decision. Backaround Rationale: On March 17, 1993, the DRB approved a request for a primary unit at 784 Potato Patch Drive, finding that all Design Guidelines had been met. The DRB voted unanimously to approve the request with the condition that the application meet zoning and two recommendation: 1) the applicant amend the landscaping plan to include portions of the adjacent lots, and 2) stone should be added to the lower level. The secondary unit was approved in October of 1991 and is currently under construction. When reviewing the secondary unit, currently under construction, in October, 1991, the applicant provided a schematic building plan for the primary unit to show that access and building connection between the primary and secondary unit had been considered. No approvals were given for the primary unit at that time. 8:55 P.M. 6. Appeal of a PEC approval to allow a Type II Employee Housing Unit Andy Knudtsen to be constructed on Lot 41/Glen Lyon/1210 Westhaven Lane. Appellant: Kristen Blume. 1 Action Reauested of Council: Uphold/overturn/modify the PEC approval. Backaround Rationale: Please see the letter of appeal and the staff memorandum to the PEC. The PEC voted 3-1 to approve the proposal. 9:25 P.M. 7. Vail Town Council appeal of a DRB decision re: final design approval Mike Mollica of the Spraddle Creek Subdivision, located to the northeast of the Kevin Lindahl Main Vail I-70 interchange. Applicant: SBC Development Corporation/Emit Rothlisberger/Jay Peterson. Action Reauested of Council: Uphold/overturn/modify the decision of the DRB. Backaround Rationale: Please see the CDD memo to the DRB dated March 17, 1993, and Mike Mollica's letter to Mr. Emil Rothlisberger, dated March 24, 1993. 9:45 P.M. 8. Final Plat review of the Spraddle Creek Subdivision, located to the Mike Mollica northeast of the Main Vail I-70 interchange. Applicant: SBC Kevin Lindahl Development Corporation/Emil Rothlisberger/Jay Peterson. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny the request for Final Plat approval. Backaround Rationale: The Final Plat for the Spraddle Creek Subdivision was approved by the PEC on February 11, 1991. This Final Plat approval carried with it approximately 26 conditions. At this time, the conditions of approval have been met with the exception of the final language to be incorporated into the Subdivision Improvements Agreement and the Subdivision Covenants. Should Council approve the Final Plat tonight, staff will not have the plat recorded at Eagle County until such time as the Subdivision Improvements Agreement and Subdivision Covenants are completed to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Staff Recommendation: The staff recommendation is for approval of the Final Plat, thereby allowing the Mayor to sign the mylars. 10:05 P.M. 9. Adjournment. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/13/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL OVERVIEW WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 4/20/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C:WGENDA.TCE 2 r MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 2, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Bob Buckley MEMBERS ABSENT: Rob Levine TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Ron Phillips, Town Manager Larry Eskwith, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Paul Johnston eA~,~~ssed concerns about street congestion and blocked parking lots and driveways caused in part by truck loading on Hanson Ranch Road in front of his establishment, the Christiania Lodge. He was also concerned about constriction of the street created by snow storage, and felt the whole situation would be further impacted by TOV's streetscape design. He distributed photos depicting the areas of his concern, showing skier drop-off, pedestrians, and citizens parking on the street, and questioned a recent change to the parking regulations there, which he felt caused traffic and noise problems during early morning hours. He urged Council to implement the 1968 agreement regarding Vail Associates, Inc.'s (VA) land (Lots P-3 and J). He indicated the delay of the implementation of that agreement was affecting completion of requirements the Christiania was supposed to meet with regard to landscaping and parking. Merv Lapin said one of the reasons for not going forward with the original plan was that the parties involved were still negotiating the future of that property. Mr. Johnston noted TOV had a $50,000 letter of credit from him as his guarantee to landscape, enhance, and improve both sides of Hanson Ranch Road. He did not feel it was logical or feasible for Council to have him do that under the present circumstances. Again he suggested the 1968 agreement be implemented and that a solution to the rights-of--way, the parking arrangements, and to the final determination of the property ownership be defined. Mr. Johnston suggested it would be appropriate for Council and the planning staff to experience first hand the problems associated with regulating the traffic on the street. Mr. Johnston next shared a photo of a 40' specimen blue spruce which had been scarred by trucks parked on Hanson Ranch Road, and he said he would like a credit for the ruined tree against his $50,000 letter of credit for the improvements he agreed to install as a part of his redevelopment project. There was discussion about the parking lot issue. Merv noted negotiations were continuing and appeared to be getting to a point where there would be some resolution, but said it was difficult to elaborate on a timeframe for the resolution of the issue at this time. Mr. Johnston felt Council should contemplate a one year extension for him without his letter of credit, and he also produced photos of the driveway at an adjacent establishment, Cyrano's, which seemed to depict a violation of their conditional use permit. Mayor Osterfoss asked Kristan Pritz if she was aware of that issue. Kristan was not certain about the agreement there, but said CDD would look into and follow-up on it. Some of the details of TOV's agreement with Mr. Johnston were discussed. A major issue was questions with the parking area. Kristan recalled the neighbors in the area were examining the concept of a parking structure with a park on top of it. Tom Steinberg advised Mr. Johnston to give his pictures to the staff and suggested that the staff arrange to visit the area in question at this time to reevaluate their plans in view of what the current on-site situation. Mayor Osterfoss asked Kristan if there was an important streetscape concept for considering narrowing of the street. Kristan said in order to put the landscaping in, with the required parking, some of the road had to be 1 removed. Tom suggested if the end solution was a park on top of a parking structure, perhaps the street would not need to be narrowed to put in landscaping because the landscaping would be in the park. Mayor Osterfoss advised a site visit to the area was planned, and felt it would be an interesting learning experience for Council and staff to go out and enforce regulations. Merv noted the Transportation and Parking Task Force was reconvening so this could be another issue for their review. Item No. 2 was the appointment of 3 new members to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC). The candidates, interviewed by Council on February 23, 1993, were Bill Anderson, Chuck Crist, Kathy Langenwalter, and Gena Whitten. There were 3 positions available, each term for two years. A ballot was taken, and Merv Lapin moved to appoint Bill Anderson and Kathy Langenwalter to the PEC until February 28, 1995. A majority of votes had not been received for any candidate for the third open position, and staff was directed to re-advertise the position. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 3 was the appointment of 2 new members to the Design Review Board (DRB). The candidates, interviewed by Council on February 23, 1993, were Michael Arnett, Sally Rich Brainerd, Alice Cartwright, Dan Doerge, Florence Steinberg, and Carmen Weiner. There were 2 positions available. Tom Steinberg stepped down due to conflict of interest. A ballot was taken, and Merv Lapin moved to appoint Michael Arnett and Sally Rich Brainerd to the DRB until February 28, 1995. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed un~n~mously, 5-0-1, Tom Steinberg absta~n;,,g, Item No. 4 was the appointment of 1 new member to the Housing Authority. The candidates, interviewed by Council on February 23, 1993, were Duane Piper and Dan Doerge. There was 1 position available for a five year term. A ballot was taken, and Tom Steinberg moved to re-appoint Duane Piper to the Housing Authority until January 31, 1995. Bob Buckley seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 5 was appointment of 4 new members to the Art in Public Places Board (AIPP). The candidates, interviewed by Council on February 23, 1993, were Alice Cartwright, Jim Cotter, Dan Doerge, Eddy Doumas, Lolita Higbie, Erich Hill, and Kyle H. Webb. There were 4 positions available. Two terms were for two years and two terms were for three years. A ballot was taken, and Merv Lapin moved to appoint Jim Cotter and Lolita Higbie to the AIPP Board until February 28, 1995, and Alice Cartwright and Erich Hill until February 28, 1996. Jim Gibson seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 6 was a Consent Agenda consisting of two items: A. Approval of the Minutes of the February 2, 1993, and February 16, 1993, Town Council Evening Meetings. B. Ordinance No. 3, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance concerning the issuance of Local Improvement Refunding Bonds of the Town of Vail, Colorado for the Booth Creek Local Improvement District; ratifying action heretofore taken in connection therewith; prescribing details in connection with said Bonds and District; prescribing duties of certain Town officials in connection therewith; repealing all ordinances and other action of the Town to the extent inconsistent herewith; and providing other matters relating thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the titles in full. Tom Steinberg moved to approve the Consent Agenda, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0 Item No. 7 was Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were MECM Ente~N~~ses and Commercial Federal Savings. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Larry Eskwith explained that it had been assumed that Westhaven Drive was owned by MECM, who was the developer of the Waterford site. However, it appeared there was now some question as to who had title to that road. He advised documents had been discovered in the foreclosure papers which made it uncertain if MECM owned that road. Consequently, 2 it would be impossible for MECM to dedicate the road to TOV if they do not own it. After brief discussion, Merv Lapin moved to table second reading of Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, until March 16, 1993. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Item No. 8 was Resolution No. 3, Series of 1993, a resolution approving and adopting the 1993-1997 Town of Vail Transit Development Plan (TDP). Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Mike Rose briefly explained the content of the TDP, and advised that it needed to be submitted to the Colorado Department of Transportation by April 15, 1993, in order to compete for $900,000 in grant money the state had available this year. Tom Steinberg moved to approve Resolution No. 3, Series of 1993, with a second from Jim Gibson. Before a vote was taken, Merv Lapin inquired about time schedule and affect if TOV were successful in receiving funds. After brief discussion, a vote was then taken and the motion passed unan~~ously, 6-0. Item No. 9 was a Town Council appeal of a Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) decision regarding a Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department, located at 75 S. Frontage Road West. Mike Mollica referenced his memo to Council dated March 2, 1993, detailing the February 22, 1993, PEC meeting during which they approved, by a vote of 4-3, a Conditional Use permit request including ten conditions of approval, for the Police Department expansion. Mike noted the first seven conditions were recommendations made by the planning staff and were carried forth by the PEC. Those seven conditions were fully detailed in the Community Development Department's (CDD) memo to the PEC dated February 22, 1993. The PEC added three additional conditions which were detailed in the above referenced March 2, 1993 memo. There was discussion concerning additional landscaping, particularly with regard to snow storage, parking requirements, the heliport, and communication with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) regarding some of their rights-of--way. Mike said the CDD was trying to keep all development proposed for this project on TOV property, including the parking spaces presently on the CDOT right-of--way. He confirmed that CDOT had agreed to allow planting and berming in theirright-of--way. Mayor Osterfoss noted there had been discussions with We Recycle and others about possible relocation because Council was in agreement with the PEC's concern that all on-site parking should be maximized. Jim Gibson turned the discussion to Ken Hughey's March 2,1993, memo to Council regarding a cost analysis of the Police Department expansion based on the PEC and CDD recommendations. That memo explained that the PEC's approval of the Conditional Use Permit request for the Police expansion contained ten conditions, most of which were not included in the approved project budget, and detailed the cost of each condition. Jim Gibson felt a number of the costs shown in the memo did not belong in the Police Department expansion budget. Tom Steinberg agreed some of the items, such as crosswalks and sidewalks, were projects which should be done as a matter of course. Before further discussion of budget issues, Mayor Osterfoss asked if there was Council consensus for the ten conditions approved by the PEC. Tom Steinberg asked if the architectural modifications to the existing building conformed to the new building. He asked why the new building was not automatically conf„~ wing to the existing building to avoid expense. Mike Mollica explained there were numerous meetings with the DRB at the PEC work sessions, and it was felt that it would not be appropriate to carry the architectural design of the existing building over to the proposed new expansion. Mayor Osterfoss asked if the architects had a design that would match the existing building. Ken said they did, and, in short, that design just showed the new building looking like the existing building. Ken explained the $103,000 was for architectural modifications to make the existing building conform to the new building. If the new building were built with new architecture, the cost would be $103,000 to redo the exterior of the existing building to match the new building, $27,000 of that amount for modification to the west entry of the existing building. Tom Steinberg pointed out if this building were modified, the Municipal Annex would not match. Jeff Bowen, PEC member and Police Addition Task Force member, said the PEC felt it was important, even with consideration of additional cost, to note that this was, in essence, the creation of a new Town Hall. He felt the buildings should match, and rather than trying to make the new building look like the existing building, the existing building should be modified so the architecture of the new building would be carried through. Dalton Williams, PEC member also felt the two buildings needed to match and needed to be more attractive 3 than the present structure. Mr. Williams said he now supported the rL~~ect in its entirety, and explained he originally voted against the project because, from a Planning Commissioner's point of view, there was no applicant before the PEC to agree to conditions. Greg Amsden, PEC member, noted the negative votes at the PEC meeting were because of parking concerns. He felt consideration should be given to satisfying additional on-site parking. He noted the proposed new building had been reduced in cost by $3,000,000 from the original cost projections, and the request for modifications to the existing building would be a major improvement to the project and should be approved. There was brief discussion concerning estimated landscaping fees, which Mr. Williams felt were low, but Mike noted Sherry Dorward, project Landscape Architect, advised the estimate was fairly accurate. Mr. Amsden expressed concern about the reduction of the original budget for this project, in what he gathered was the intent to purchase another parcel in TOV co*nmonly known as the Vail Commons parcel. He felt the conditions being requested for the Police Department expansion at this time should be considered, because he felt they were minor adjustments to the overall benefit of this project. Further, he felt the cost Council had agreed to on the Vail Commons parcel was high, and that he had evidence to that affect. He offered to discuss that issue further with Council. Mayor Osterfoss said she wanted to hear the DRB's response as to whether matching the existing building was appropriate. Kristan Pritz noted the DRB were present at two PEC work sessions where they focused primarily on design issues and did not get into parking issues. She said the DRB did discuss the design, and the CDD would solicit their response about matching the existing building. Mayor Osterfoss wanted to be certain the DRB had the opportunity to consider extending the design of the existing building. Jim Gibson stated he did not recall a decision made by Council to adhere to the increased budget to accommodate the PEC decisions. Ken Hughey said he would have to review the meeting tapes, but it was his recollection that, should the PEC and DRB add conditions to the project, that those "add-ons" would be above the $3,000,000 budget because Council had been asked what the PD could work with to build the building and what was needed to design the building. As Ken recalled, the $3,000,000 was to build the building, and if the PEC or DRB added anything, then Council would need to decide whether or not to add on to the budget. Mayor Osterfoss felt items that would be highly desirable to have, regardless of whether or not there was an addition to the Municipal Building, could come of out of the Capital Projects budget, if affordable over time. She felt architectural modifications to the existing building which the DRB felt were an important part of this project, were part of the project. She agreed with Jim Gibson that other things on Ken's list -fixing the roof, additional landscaping/north side, signage plan, sidewalks, and fire code compliance -were things that should be done as a matter of course and should not be part of the Police Building expansion budget. Tom Steinberg and Jim Shearer agreed the Police Building expansion budget should not be burdened with these dollars, including the facade changes. Lengthy discussion followed concerning whether to modify existing building to match the expansion as Council examined schematic and elevation drawings of the new building. In response to Kristan's questions, Mayor Osterfoss said perhaps it would be more useful to give the DRB direction as to whether Council wanted the new building to match the existing building. After review and discussion about the facade changes and agreement that there should be continuity for the whole project, Mayor Osterfoss directed the DRB to work with the revised plan, which Ken Hughey presented, without the incremental $103,000, except for examining the new entryway for the existing building. It was determined the new entryway would be paid for from the Capital Projects budget. Jim Gibson then moved to uphold the PEC's decision to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an addition to the Municipal Building to house the Vail Police Department located at 75 South Frontage Road West (at the east end of the existing Municipal Building) with the following exceptions: that the architectural modifications to the existing building be removed and the new building be made to look like the existing building; that the roof improvements, fire code compliance, crosswalks, additional landscaping, and signage plan not be a part of the Police Department expansion budget but would be paid for out of the Capital Projects budget; that the increased structural framing for future additions be eliminated; that the $27,000 for the modified west entryway be approved as an addition to the $3,000,000 for this project's budget; and that there would be an owner's representative paid for out of the project's budget. Merv Lapin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4 unanimously, 6-0. Before adjournment, several issues not on the agenda were raised. Caroline Fisher discussed the 1993 Community Survey, noting members of the community had requested better avenues to express their opinions to TOV. She advised a number of avenues had been implemented in the last three years including Speak Up Meetings, full resident surveys, input cards, and the resident input tracking system. However, she felt there was a popular feeling that it was time to take TOV's citizen surveying program to a higher level. She explained Vail Associates, Inc. had hired Nolan Rosall, of Rosall, Remmen & Cares, and had now embarked on an aggressive public opinion surveying process. Caroline said she had been speaking with Mr. Rosall regarding TOV's surveying process, and felt Mr. Rosall should be hired to assist TOV in implementing more effective avenues for both accomplishing the public relations element of the surveying and as a tool for gathering information for budget priorities. The survey approach proposed by Mr. Rosall would include focus group meetings, a one page front and back mail out survey, and a phone survey combining public outreach of a mailing to a full population of 8,000 people, as well as random audio taped and transcribed focus group meetings and phone surveys. The total amount of this entire process would be $10,000. Caroline advised $8,178 had been budgeted, and asked Council to approve the additional expense for the upgraded surveying process. After brief discussion, Tom Steinberg moved to appropriate up to $2,000 out of the Council Contingency budget to proceed with the Rosall study. Merv Lapin seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Larry Eskwith discussed the discovery, approximately two years ago, of an underground tank at the Old Town Shops site. He advised that when the tank was pulled, groundwater contamination was found, as well as a gasoline spill at the adjacent service station. Mr. Leonard Slosky was hired at that time to study the situation. It was Mr. Slosky's opinion that any contamination of TOV groundwater there had been caused by the spill at the adjacent property. Larry said TOV also thought that mediation that was being done at the adjacent service station would also cleanse the groundwater on TOV property. Larry recommended that Mr. Slosky return at this time to determine whether the mediation on the adjoining property had in fact cleansed the groundwater on TOV's property. Larry said TOV needed to get these tests done in a timely manner, and if the tests showed the groundwater had not be cleansed, Council needed to decide whether or not to litigate the matter. He advised TOV had obtained an extension of the statute of limitations to bring a lawsuit against Chevron, and he felt TOV could protect itself by bringing the action, yet he was concerned about litigating if there was no reason to. He felt the cost of proceeding with a lawsuit against Chevron would very quickly equal the cost of the recommended testing. Larry added he had hired the services of Flo Phillips, environmental specialist, for assistance with potential litigation. After brief discussion, Jim Gibson moved to hire Slosky and Company to test the wells for the sum of $4,278 to be paid from Council Contingency funds. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Larry said he would speak with Mr. Slosky to determine whether this testing would firmly establish whether the groundwater had been mediated or not. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Jim Gibson stated he wanted to discuss the proposed Vail Commons purchase. It was agreed to discuss this item in Executive Session after adjournment of the regular meeting. Mayor Osterfoss noted Helen Fritch, President of the Board of the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation, had written expressing the Foundation's desire to maintain closer communication with Council. Ms. Fritch invited Council to appoint a Council member to act as an advisory member on the Vail Alpine Garden Board. Jim Shearer nominated Bob Buckley to accept that appointment, with a second from Jim Gibson. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 6-0. Council agreed to address a letter dated February 23, 1993, from Dave Cole regarding Smoking in Public Places at a work session after ski season. A letter dated February 22, 1993, had been received from Josef Staufer, President of the Vail Village Inn (VVI), regarding $47,500 VVI was required to pay toward the cost of moving the Ski Museum. Merv Lapin felt there were facts missing from Mr. Staufer's letter, and Jim Gibson suggested that the planning staff assemble all of the facts before discussion at a future work session. 5 There being no further business, Merv Lapin moved that Council adjourn into Executive Session to discuss a land negotiation contract. Jim Gibson seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unan~*nously, 6-0. The meeting was adjourned to Executive Session at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:UAINSMAR2.93 6 MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, March 16, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Jim Gibson Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Rob Levine MEMBERS ABSENT: Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Bob Buckley TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Larry Grafel, Acting Town Manager Larry Eskwith, T., W u Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Bill Hanlon noted he had spoken with Ken Hughey concerning increased policing in the Village and walk-throughs on private properties as a deterrent to any potential problems during the upcoming Spring breaks. Ken Hughey noted TOV did not have the staffing levels to meet peak demand times, but the Police Department had been trying to respond to all requests for additional walk-throughs in hotels and the parking structures. He added there were contingency plans to put staff on overtime to meet the needs of lodge owners and people the Village if needed. Mr. Hanlon also expressed his feeling that TOV was at a point where afull-time Mayor and Council, as well as a Town Manager, were needed. Item No. 2 was a Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Ordinance No. 41, Series of 1991, to provide changes to Area A requirements for SDD No. 4 that concern the development plans for The Waterford and The Cornerstone Development Building Sites; and setting forth details in regard thereto. The applicants were MECM Ente~~.L~ses and Commercial Federal Savings. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Shelly Mello discussed issues addressed in the Community Development Department's (CDD) March 11, 1993, memo to Council requesting an insertion into paragraph 18.46.104 of this ordinance to allow the applicant, with staff review, to modify common areas and add up to 1,000 square feet of additional common axes in order to meet adopted TOV codes. Shelly explained, after further development of the structural plans for this project, the applicant had found that, due to the American Disability Act, Uniform Fire Code, and the Uniform Building Code there was a demand for an increase in common area and modification to common areas for the building. Shelly noted staff found this was a common request once building plans moved from planning stages to construction stages, and felt the requested insertion into this ordinance was an appropriate addition. Council agreed to the requested insertion. Fred Otto advised he had learned he did not own Westhaven Drive; it was still owned by Vail Ventures. However, he said a coalition of the four remaining undeveloped parcels, the MECM site, the Building C site (Cornerstone), the Ruins site (Westhaven Apartments), and the Triplex site (Millrace III) and the Cascade Village Association (CVA) would make a contribution of $97,500 to TOV to assist TOV with refurbishing Westhaven Drive and taking it over. Mr. Otto stated the $97,500 would be contributed as follows: $24,000 from CVA, $23,000 from Commercial Federal who owns the Building C site (Cornerstone), $5,000 from Mike Lauterbach for Millrace IV, $24,500 from MECM, and $21,000 from the owner of the Ruins (Westhaven Apartments.) The $97,500 figure was the figure derived at and detailed in Larry Grafel's memo to Council dated February 12, 1993, regarding Westhaven Drive improvements. The memo indicated the Public Works Department (PW) had reviewed the information provided by the applicants at a meeting with Greg Hall, TOV Engineer, Estaquio Cortina, Ned Gwathmey, Jerry Mulliken, and Larry Grafel on February 10, 1993, and PW 1 i had analyzed that inf~~u.ation with regard to the subdivision ordinance standards for public streets. The memo listed specific improvements required for Westhaven Driver and cost estimates for those improvements. The mechanics of transferring title and dedicating Westhaven Drive to TOV were discussed. Mr. Otto noted that Andy Norris had no problem himself deeding over the road, but Mr. Otto indicated that Mr. Norris could not supply information about the status of transferring title from other owners. Mr. Otto said this issue would require further investigation, which he felt was a responsibility he hoped TOV would assist with. There was discussion about the timeframe for payment of the $97,500. Mr. Otto said he had hoped to have that as a condition of Certificate of Occupancy (CO). He did not, however, have a problem either putting it up before that time or bonding it. He assumed if TOV received title, TOV would take over maintenance and snow removal. Mayor Osterfoss felt it would be sensible for TOV to consider taking over maintenance and snow removal once it received title to the road, and, in conjunction with that, felt that would be the appropriate time for the applicants to pay the $97,500. Mr. Otto said that would work, but felt it was important to the participants in this project to understood that the only thing that was going to happen was an overlay. There would be no change in the curvature or line of sight, no change in the bridge, and that existing encroachments lying within Westhaven Drive would not require a license or encroachment agreement. Mr. Otto anticipated the deeding of the road and payment of the $97,500 would occur in 1993. He felt construction of the road would not normally be done until heavy construction was completed, so he expected, if they could get started this summer with the heavy equipment and steel erection, construction of the road could be done in the summer of 1994. Mayor Osterfoss asked if there would be any cost changes as a result of proceeding in 1994. Larry Grafel stated if there was a delay, current prices with an approximate 5% increase would be appropriate to consider. Mr. Otto pointed out the $97,500 estimate in Larry Grafel's memo contained a $19,500 contingency, and Mr. Otto hoped if construction was less than that, the difference would be returned pro rata to the participants. Mayor Osterfoss felt that was a reasonable request. There was further discussion about the project's timeframe, Tom Steinberg indicating TOV did not want to be held to this agreement indefinitely; this agreement was for 1993 as far as he was concerned. Mr. Otto also indicated his group felt TOV should participate in this in some form. He said he has been struggling to get Glen Lyon to participate in this as they were the direct beneficiary of all of this, but to date they have not been able to find a way to get Glen Lyon to participate. Tom said the building permit was tied to TOV's receipt of the $97,500 and the title to the land, and if Mr. Otto could not get title until 1994, the project would not go until 1994. Mr. Otto felt TOV had to cooperate and conduct, at his cost, a condemnation proceeding. Mr. Otto and Larry Eskwith discussed the details and timing involved with condemnation proceedings including appraisals and public hearings. It was noted the condemned party had thirty days to obtain an appraisal, and Mr. Otto would be responsible for charges incurred for that. Larry felt it could be four to six months before actual receipt of immediate possession could occur. Mayor Osterfoss summarized the sequence of events to occur: the title for Westhaven Drive was to be presented at no cost to TOV, that $97,500 would be contributed to TOV by the group of interested property owners in the area, and following that a building permit would be issued. Larry Eskwith confirmed that MECM did not presently own the road, and because TOV could possibly be taking a Quit Claim Deed, Larry indicated he wanted a title commitment policy. The building permit issue was discussed. Mr. Otto felt it was reasonable to make that a condition of occupancy. All agreed it would be to the benefit of all to see building commence this summer, but Mr. Otto felt if TOV made acquisition of the road a condition of the building permit, he did not feel summer building would be possible if Larry's four to six month estimate was correct. Mr. Otto said the money would be there, but title to the road may take the amount of time Larry Eskwith thought. Mayor Osterfoss stated until title and the money were there, TOV would not be maintaining the road. She also said because Larry Grafel and Greg Hall had analyzed the cost for this project, at $97,500 it should be considered TOV was contributing the cost of design, testing, and project management. There was additional discussion about the 1993 cost estimates versus future costs. Larry Grafel noted, as Mr. Otto had mentioned, there was a contingency in the $97,500, it was preferable to do the project all at once, and he felt it would be possible to do it after the heavy equipment was there and construction was underway. Larry Grafel felt the damage would be minimal and it could be done at a later time without major cost implications. 2 After further conversation regarding timing of the road construction, an agreement was reached that, upon payment of the $97,500, a building permit could be issued even if title had not been transferred to TOV with the understanding that maintenance of the road would not start nor would there be issuance of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) until title was also transferred. It was also established that if TOV was required to proceed with condemnation, that would be at Mr. Otto's expense. Larry Eskwith said it needed to be clear in the ordinance that when Mr. Otto's expense was addressed, not only the expense of the proceeding was to be addressed, but also the expense of any bond as the escrow for immediate possession. Mr. Otto said he then wanted to have a heavy hand in the condemnation proceeding because he felt he could do it very fast and very cheaply and wanted to be able to select the attorneys. It was mutually agreed that the developer would participate in any necessary condemnation proceedings. After further discussion, Jim Gibson moved to approve Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1993, on second reading, with the following conditions agreed upon by TOV and the property owner: an effort would begin to obtain title to Westhaven Drive at no cost to TOV, $97,500 would be paid to TOV by the group who had made commitments to pay that, subsequent to the payment of the $97,500 building permits could be obtained to begin projects in Waterford and Cornerstone, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancies would not be issued by TOV for either building until title for the road had been transferred to TOV and at that time maintenance of that road by TOV would begin, if the ~,~,.ject came in for less than $97,500, those funds would be returned by TOV to those who contributed, condemnation costs would be paid for by the applicant and TOV would cooperate in conducting condemnation proceedings with the applicant choosing attorneys and appraisers, the specific improvements required to Westhaven Drive were those things specified in Larry Grafel's memo dated February 12, 1993, including that all transverse and longitudinal cracks would be sealed with a pave prep fabric prior to overlay, that any asphalt distress areas would be removed and reworked prior to overlay, 2' of asphalt would be removed and the base recompacted and new asphalt placed from Station 0+00 (Bridge) to Station 6+75 (Westin Hotel Entrance) right edge and once that overlay was completed, the minimum section would be 4" asphalt over 4" basecourse, that 2' of asphalt would be removed and the base recompacted and new asphalt placed from Station 5+00 (Westhaven Apartments/Parking Structure Exit) to Station 7+00 (lower Cascade Club Entrance} left edge and once that overlay was completed the minimum section would be 4" asphalt over 4" basecourse, that the existing concrete pan would be removed and replaced with Type II B curb and gutter at Station 0+00 - 5+00 right side, that the existing concrete pan would be removed at Station 0+00 - 1+901eft side and Type II B curb and gutter would be installed and appropriate drive cuts and drive pans would be provided as well as a 6' sidewalk installed, Type II B curb and gutter would be installed from Station 1+90 -5+00 left side and appropriate drive cuts and drive plans and a 6' sidewalk would be installed at Station 1+90 - 5+00 left side and a 6' walk would be installed from Station 2+50 - 5+00, that at Station 5+00 - 10+00 left side, the existing concrete pan would be removed and replaced with Type II B curb and gutter and appropriate drive cuts and drive pans would be provided as well as a 6' sidewalk, that at Station 6+75 right side, the pan would be reworked to ensure storm flows stay on Westhaven Drive, that at Station 8+40 right side, the curb would be reworked and drivecut to ensure water would not flow into delivery doors of the conference center, that Type II B curb and gutter and a 6' sidewalk would be installed at Station 8+60 - 9+80 right side, that any broken curb sections in the cul-de-sac area would be repaired prior to overlaying and that it would be assumed there would be 30 l.f. of curb replacement, that the entire road would be overlayed with 1 1/2" hot bituminous pavement, that 2 hooded inlets with sediment traps and 15" emp piping to discharge the flows to Gore Creek would be installed at Station 0+10 left and right side, that at Station 5+00 left side the existing valley inlet would be converted to a hooded inlet, that at Station 2+00 - 3+50 right side rocks and landscaping would be modified to improve sight distance, that at Station 3+00 - 4+751eft side rocks would be moved back to improve snow storage capacity, that at Station 3+50 + 4+75 right side rocks would be moved back to improve snow storage capacity, that any settled pavers would be reworked and brought up to grade, and that applicant would work to control runoff/icing problem on the stairs to the Cascade Club, and there would be a paragraph added to 18.46.104 of the ordinance to allow the applicant to add an additional 1,000 square feet of common area in the Waterford Building. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 5-0. Larry Grafel introduced TOV's new Town Clerk, Holly McCutcheon. At 8:20 P.M., a motion to adjourn the meeting to Executive Session to discuss legal, 3 J , personnel, and real estate matters was made and passed unanimously, 5-0. Council reconvened the Regular Evening Meeting at 9:45. Jim Gibson was not present during this part of the meeting. The following issues were addressed: Tom Steinberg moved to approve the Agreement and General Release Contract for Rondall V. Phillips' severance as modified, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. Larry Eskwith explained that authorization for Cockrell, Quinn, and Creighton to begin litigation, if necessary, against Chevron and Amoco concerning the groundwater contamination on the Old Town Shop property was needed. Rob Levine moved to approve such authorization, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 4-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:~MINMAR16.93 4 t 5 V ORDINANCE NO. 8 SERIES OF 1993 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, THE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, POLICE CONFISCATION FUND, HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND, AND 1992 BOND PROCEED FUND OF THE 1993 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1993 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1992, adopting the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10{a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations for the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: FUND AMOUNT General Fund $ 298,619 Capital Projects Fund 4,176,590 Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 1,230,853 Police Confiscation Fund 18,166 Heavy Equipment Fund 8,476 1992 Bond Proceeds Fund 1,670,000 7,402,704 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any 1 I 4 1 duty imposed, any violation that occurred, prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 20th day of April 20, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCuthceon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of April, 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD93.8 2 . ~ ~ ~p ORDINANCE NO. 8 SERIES OF 1993 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, THE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, POLICE CONFISCATION FUND, HEAVY E(~UIPMENT FUND, AND 1992 BOND PROCEED FUND OF THE 1993 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1993 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1992, adopting the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, the Town Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations for the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: FUND AMOUNT General Fund $ 231,'r9.2p8d/? Capital Projects Fund 4-;-03, ~:;3 ~ X76 S9o Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 1, 1~0, ~7^_- ~ Z3~ 8S3 Police Confiscation Fund 18,166 Heavy Equipment Fund 8,476 1992 Bond Proceeds Fund 1,670,000 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any 1 duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. Alt bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 20th day of April 20, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCuthceon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of April, 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD93.8 2 ORDINANCE NO. 8 SERIES OF 1993 AN ORDINANCE MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TOWN OF VAIL GENERAL FUND, CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND, THE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FUND, POLICE CONFISCATION FUND, HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND, AND 1992 BOND PROCEED FUND OF THE 1993 BUDGET AND THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF SAID APPROPRIATIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN; AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO. WHEREAS, contingencies have arisen during the fiscal year 1993 which could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated by the Town Council at the time it enacted Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1992, adopting the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Town has received certain revenues not budgeted for previously; and, WHEREAS, the Tawn Manager has certified to the Town Council that sufficient funds are available to discharge the appropriations referred to herein, not otherwise reflected in the Budget, in accordance with Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the foregoing, the Town Council finds that it should make certain supplemental appropriations as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO that: 1. Pursuant to Section 9.10(a) of the Charter of the Town of Vail, Colorado, the Town Council hereby makes the following supplemental appropriations for the 1993 Budget and Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado, and authorizes the expenditure of said appropriations as follows: FUND AMOUNT General Fund $ 281,369 Capital Projects Fund 4,058,858 Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 1,190,434 Police Confiscation Fund 18,166 Heavy Equipment Fund 8,476 1992 Bond Proceeds Fund 1,670,000 7,227,303 2. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. 3. The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 4. The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any 1 s t duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. 5. All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are repealed to the extend only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 6th day of April, 1993, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 20th day of April 20, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCuthceon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this 20th day of April, 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD83,8 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Larry Eskwith FROM: Shelly Mello DATE: April 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Loper property -Lot 15, Vail Potato Patch 1st Filing The following is a chronological review of the approval process for the Loper project located on Lot 15, Vail Potato Patch, 1st Filing. •September 21, 1992 Loper Construction Services applied for design approval of a three-story single family residence and corresponding site work developed within the Primary/Secondary guidelines (with possible future second residence). •October 7, 1992 Conceptual Review - In the review of the building, the DRB discussed that overhangs were to be added to the building, landscaping at the northeast corner and northwest corner were to be added, and the split-face block should be reconsidered. •October 21, 1992 The DRB reviewed the changes from the last meeting and felt that the applicant had addressed their previous concerns. There were two recommendations made by the Chairman of the DRB, Ned Gwathmey, regarding the drainage study and the driveway and also that the applicant should consider using thicker pickets and railings on the building. In reviewing this application, the DRB requested the applicant to consider the location of the primary unit which was not being proposed, but could be built in the future. The applicant provided a massing model and also indicated the location of this building on the site plan as a dashed line for future development. The DRB reviewed the location in regards to providing proper access and also making sure that the proposed building and the future development would be attached to meet the DRB Guidelines. The applicant showed that this was possible and indicated the location of the building, but did not go as far as indicating building design. A motion was made by George Larnb to approve the application with conditions and recommendations. Sherry Dorward abstained from voting as she was the Landscape Architect for the project. There were four conditions of approval for the application: e r 1. That the application must comply with zoning; 2. That the application must comply with the Public Works Department's requirements for landscaping and grading; 3. That the application must comply with the Fire Department requirement which indicated that the building is to be sprinkled; and 4. That the applicant needed to obtain approval for grading from the adjacent property owner to the west, due to the proximity of the driveway to the property line. •November 17, 1992 A building permit was released for the secondary unit as proposed and approved by the DRB. The GRFA for the building was less than 40% and therefore, qualified as a secondary unit. This had also been indicated in previous reviews. •January 11, 1993 The Town of Vail received an application for the primary unit to be located on Lot 15, Vail Potato Patch, Filing No. 1. This primary unit was the second phase of development for the parcel as there was already a secondary unit under construction on the site. •February 3, 1993 The DRB discussed the changes to the secondary unit already under construction on Lot 15. At that time it was felt that these changes needed to be addressed prior to the review of the proposed primary unit. In addition, the DRB discussed the compatibility of the two structures and felt that as proposed, the buildings did not match and did not have the same character. At that meeting, the DRB directed the applicants to come back to the next meeting with these issues addressed. The application was then tabled to February 17, 1993. •February 17, 1993 The DRB discussed the changes and it was felt that the changes were better. After much discussion by the adjacent property owners as well as the DRB, the DRB directed the applicant to return with photo studies of the building. The DRB Chairman, Ned Gwathmey, did state that the applicant had dealt with the comments made at the last meeting and the comments made by the neighbors concerning the east elevation, but was "bucking the grades and the south elevation was very visible". He said he would like to see the applicant work with the neighbors to come to an accord. He further stated that the DRB cannot deny the rights to build. or develop and that the neighbors could be asking for unobtainable items. The application was then tabled to the March 3rd DRB meeting. •March 3, 1993 Tabled 2 i •March 17, 1993 There were two items on this agenda relating to Lot 15. The first was the review of the changes to the secondary unit under construction and the second was the review of the proposed primary unit. George Lamb, the new Chairman of the DRB, gave the background on the project which included the background on the approval of the secondary unit in 1992. The DRB discussed the changes to the secondary unit. The changes were approved with the condition that the applicant amend the application to indicate that the darker stucco would be 3 inches in width and the lighter stucco would be 1 inch. The DRB then went on to review the primary unit. Again, George explained the intent of the Primary/Secondary zone district and background on how the primary unit was approved in relationship to the secondary unit. He felt that this process was an advantage to the DRB and allowed them to address the project up front as it related to building connections as well as access. He also explained the process to those present. Bill Pierce, project architect, discussed his efforts to comply with the neighbors desires by moving the building uphill, stepping the roof and removing the mass from the street. They also added landscaping to the east and west sides of the property, as well as to the south. The front setback was also increased. In this discussion, the adjacent property owners legal representative, Art Abplanalp, brought up a number of zoning issues. Kristan Pritz, Director of Community Development, indicated that the DRB had no ability to address zoning criteria within this review and that zoning was addressed by the staff and that the DRB only had the ability to review the application according to the Design Review Board Guidelines. The applicant was asked if he would agree to place landscaping on the adjacent properties and he agreed that he would work with the adjacent property owners to accomplish this. A motion was made to approve the application by Mike Arnett. The application included one condition and two recommendations. The condition was that the application meet zoning and the two recommendations asked that the applicant amend the landscaping plan and submit it to the Town and that stone be added to the lower level of the building. The motion was seconded by Kathy Langenwalter and approved unanimously. The DRB felt that the application did meet the Design Review Board criteria and that the applicant had complied with the criteria as well as worked with the DRB to make changes which addressed the adjacent property owners issues. 3 - - w t: Yi. DESIGN REVIEW - e. The applicant or his authorized representative shall be present at the design revicw board meeting. 3. Staff approval. The zoning administrator may approve any of the following applications: - . a. Any application to an existing building that dots not . significantly change the existing plants of the building and is generally consistent with the architectural design, materials and colors of the building, including, but not limited to windows, skylights, siding, and r other similar modifcations; b. An application for an addition to an existing building that is consistent with the architectural design, mate- rials and colon of the building, and approval has been received by an authorized member of a condominium association, if applicable. e. An application to remove or modify the existing vegetation or landscaping upon a sift. ' In the above-specified cases, the zoning admin- . - istrator may revicw and approve the application, approve the application with certain modifications, - g or may refer any application to the design revicw board for decision. All other applications shall be _ referred to the design review board. ~ - - (Ord. I2(I988) § 1: Ord. 39(1983) § l.) - 18.Sd.050 Design guideline. Actions of the design review board shall be guided by the ~ . e~ ~ objectives prescribed in Section 18.54.010, the Vail Village and - ~ .r_ rte: _ _ ,~F* Vail Lionshead Urban Design Considerations and Guide Plans, ~ by all of the applicable ordinances of the Town of Vail, and by the following design guidelines: 'I.~Stivctures shall be compatible with existing structures, _ i ~ their surroundings, and with Veil's environment. It is not to be inferred that buildings must look alike to be ti compatible. Compatibility can be achieved through the - proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and compliance with ~ the guidelines herein contained. - . . . 8.; 4 • w F.. :yd S: c ZONING = 2s~'? Any building site in Vail is likely to have its own unique - : ~ land forms and features. Whenever possible, these exist- - ing fcatures should be preserved and reinforced by new ~ construction. The objective is to fit the buildings to their - sites in a way that leaves the natural land forms and futures intact, treating the buildings as an integral part of the site, rather than as isolated objects at odds with their ~ - surroundings. B. Site. planning. ' ~~1: The location and configuration of structures and access . • ways shall be responsive to the existing topography of the . site upon which they are to be located. Grading require- menu resulting from development shall be designed to blend into the existing or natural landscape. Any cuts or - fills shall be sculptural in form and contoured to blend with the existing natural undisturbed terrain within the ' " ~ property boundary. ~ 2. Building siting and access thereto shall be responsive to existing fcatures of terrain rock outcroppings, drainage _ patterns, and vegetation. - x 3: Removal of trees, shrubs, and other native vegetation - ~ shall be limited to removal of those essential for develop- , ; f: mcnt of the site or those identified as diseased. _ 4: All areas disturbed during construction shall be re- t , vegetated. If necessary, the DRB may designate allowable . . limits of construction activity and require physical bar- riers in order to preserve significant natural features and vegetation upon a site and adjacent sites during con- _ ~ } struction. - - S All projects shall be designed so as to provide adequate - ~ _ - snow storage areas for snow cleared from the parking - - areas and roadways within the project..- • # C° p Building materials and destgn~~ ~ - - ~ ~ Building materials shall be predominantly. natural such as wood siding, wood shakes, and native stone. Brick is ~ w? ' acceptable. Where stucco is utilized, gross textures -and -zs ~ surface features that appear to imitate other materials . shall be avoided. Concrete surfaces shall be treated with =_'.4 1;< texture and color if used, however exposed aggregate is more acceptable than raw concrete. Neither aluminum 454d _ • . _ (Vail 8-2-88) - . . ,~M1 - , DESIGN REVIEW - ~ _ steel, or plastic siding, nor simulated stone or brick shall ~ - be pcrtnittcd. Plywood siding shall not be permitted. - - - " - ~2: The same or similar building materials and colors shall be ~ used on main structures and any accessory structures - - upon the site. - 3: Exterior wall colors should be compatible with the site " and surrounding buildings. Natural colors (earth tones _ found within the Vail area) should be utilized. Primary . - colors or other bright colors should be used only as - - accents and thin sparingly such as upon trim or railings. All exterior wall materials must be continued down to y finished grade thereby eliminating unfinished foundation walls. All exposed metal flashing, trim, flues, and roof top mechanical equipment shall be annodizcd, painted or capable of weathering so as to be non-reflective. _ 4:~ The majority of roof forms within Vail arc gable roofs - " ~ with a pitch of at least four feet in twtlve feet. However, other roof forms are allowed. Consideration of environ- mental and climatic determinants such as snow shedding, drainage, and solar exposure should be integral to the - roof design. - 5.~ Roof lines should be designed so as not to deposit snow - on parking areas, trash storage areas, stairways, decks - ` and balconies, or entryways. Secondary roofs, snow clips, " and snow guards should be utilized to protect these areas . from roof snow shedding if necessary. = = - Roof surfacing materials shall be compatible with the side T= and surrounding buildings. The predominant roof materials - _ - _ utilized shall be wood shakes and their use is strongly ,encouraged. The use of metal roofs is acceptable, however in no instance will metal roofs which reflect direct sunlight ' - onto an adjacent property be permitted. If metal roofs are used they shall be surfaced with slow-gloss finish or ' capable of weathering to a dull finish. Metal roofs shall - = generally have a standing seam in order to provide some relief to the roof surface and be of a heavy gauge. Asphalt _ = - and fiberglass shingles shall be permitted provided that they . weigh no less than three hundrrd potu~ds per roofing square - ~ - foot and are of a design and color to be compatible with the requirements of Section 18.54.050. 454e (Va~11-8-91) ~ - . - - 4 y ZONING +7~ Rooftop heating and air conditioning equipment, large . : , vent stacks, elevator penthouses and similar features should be avoided, however, if necessary, shall be de- ~ - signed to be compatible with the overall design of the _ . _ _ ~ structure or screened from view. Rooftop antennae shall s~ not be permitted unless as allowed under a conditional _ use review as specifed within the zoning code. - a-8. Solar collectors shall lie flat on pitched roofs, however, -s:=° when retrofitting an existing building with active solar the collectors should be designed and placed in a manner _ compatible with the ovtrall design of the building. 9 Deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and other building features that provide shelter from the elements are encouraged. 10. Fenestration should be suitable for the climate and for the orientation of the particular building elevation in which : the fenestration occurs. The use of both passive and active s solar energy systems is strongly encouraged. 11. Exterior lighting shall be designed and located in a manner to minimize impact of lighting upon living areas - within a proposed project and upon adjacent structures _ _ and properties. - - ,:12. In no instance shall a duplex structure be so constructed as to result in each half of the structure appearing a substantially similar or mirror image in design. _ - _ D.-~ Landscaping/drainage/erosion control. _ - _ 1. Various natural vegetation zones exist within the Gore _ Valley as a result of the form and aspects of the land itself. - . _ - t _ , t: . . . _ ._,_4 _ , ~ - -.5 l - ' . ~ T . .k . ~ i~ j e ~ Gv..~.~ r.. . t - ::6 3} 1 - 1 x.. :-ELF _ ~r A ~ ~ . 'sir +`.a if:. * t.. 454f (Yak 1-8-91) DESIG~i REVIEW The north facing slopes within the valley arc typically heavily wooded with spruce, pine and aspen and generally receive less direct sunlight than the drier south facing _ ' slopes which typically consist of sage, aspen and other vegetation tolerant of drier conditions. The valley floor which is adjacent to Gore Creek consists of wide variety of trees and shrubs adapted to the relatively fertile soil and natural availability of water. . ~ The goal of any landscape plan should be to preserve and enhance the natural landscape character of the area in which it is to be located. The landscape scale and overall landscapc design shall be developed so that new vcgeta- . lion is integral with the natural landscape and the inherent form line, color and texture of the local plant communities. Since the major objective of the land- . scaping is to help reduce the scale of new structures and to assist in the screening of structures, the planting of large " sized plant materials is encouraged. Special care should be taken in selecting the types of plants to use when designing a landscapc plan. Final selection should be based upon the soils and climate, ease of establishment, suitability for the specific use desired, and the level of maintenance that can be provided. Ncw planting shall use plants that arc indigenous to the Rocky Mountain alpine ` and sub-alpine zones or as capable of being introduced - into these zones. - - - _ , A list of plant materials indigenous to the Vail area is - - on file with the department of community development. , _ Also indicated on the list arc ornamentals which are Pr, r ~ l rfi suitable for planting within the Vail area. The minimum , r:`_- sizes of landscape materials acceptable are az follows: - a: Required trees. - - _ - - Deciduous -two inch caliper . s Conifers -six foot ~ , - ~ ~ Required shrubs - ~S gallon container , Foundation shrubs shall have a minimum height of eighteen inches at time of planting. 2.. Landscape design shall be developed to locate new planting in order to extend existing canopy edges or r., , 4S4g (Vail 11-IS-63) ' 4, _ _ ~ . _ - - _ s . , i y.' A" f ZONING . - planted in natural looking groups. Geometric plantings, evenly spaced rows of trees, and other formal landscape patterns shall be avoided. . ~ 3. Particulaz attention shall be given the landscape design of off-street parking lots to reduce adverse impacts upon living areas within the proposed development, upon adjacent properties, and upon public spaces with regard _ - - to noise, lights, and visual impact. Pazking lots of fifteen or more spaces shall comply with the landscape require- ments found in Section 18.52.080(F.) of the Vail Munici- t - pal Codc. ~4. All landscaping shall be provided with a method of irrigation suitable to ensure the continued maintenance of planted materials. S. Whenever possible natural drainage patterns upon the - site shall not be modified. Negative drainage impacts ~ ~ upon adjacent sifts shall not be allowed. _ s 6. Runoff from impervious surfaces such as roofs and _ pavement areas shall be directed to natural or improved ~ - drainage channels or dispersed into shallow sloping vegetated areas. - 7. Slope of cut and fill banks shall be determined by soil - characteristics for the specific site to avoid erosion, and ; _ - promote revcgctation opportunities, but in any cast shall ~ ~ be limited to a maximum of 2:1 slope. ' _ - 8. Measures shall be taken to retain all eroded soil material - on site during construction, control both ground water and surface water runoff, and to permanently stabilize all _ ~ disturbed slopes and drainage features upon completion - _ . of construction. h'` 9.- All plants shall be planted in a good quality topsoil mix of ~ . - f - a type and amount recommended by the American ~ ; ~i .Landscape Contractor Association and the Colorado ~ ` - Nurseryman's Association. ~ _ 10: All plantings must be mulched. ` ' 11.~ Paving near a tree to be saved must contain a plan fora - ~a "tree vault" in order to ensure the ability of the roots to ~ • • ~ `X v receive air. ' E - Fencing j walls. ` 1 ~ The placement of walls and Cences shall respect existing - land forms and fit into land massing rather than arbi- - - 454h (Yail l I-IS-83) DESIGN REVIEW - trarily follow site boundary lines. Fences shall not be . encouraged except to screen trash areas, utility equip- - ~ ment, etc. 2. Design of fences, walls, and other structural landscape ' features shall be of materials compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site. Retaining walls - and cribbing should utilize natural materials such as wood timbers, logs, rocks, or textured, color tinted concrete. No chain Jink fences shall be allowed except as temporary construction fences or as required for recrea- tional facilities. 3. The allowable heights of retaining walls shall be as stated in Section 18.58.424 of the Vail Municipal Code. F. Accessory structures/utilities; service areas. 1. Design of accessory structures upon a site shall be compatible with the design and materials of the main structure or structures upon the site. 2. Accessory buildings generally should be attached to the main building either directly or by means of a continuous - wall, fence or similar feature of the same or a com- ' Dlcmentarv material ac the main building's exterior finis},. 3. Repealed by Ord. 24 { 1985) § 1.) 4, All utility service systems shall be installed undtrground. Any utility system the operation of which requires above ground installation shall be located and j or screened so as f - ~ , , not to detract from the overall site design quality. . . 5. All utility meters shall be enclosed or screened from _ R_r public view. . ~ . 6. Service areas, outdoor storage, and garbage storage shall . - - be screened from adjacent properties, structures, streets, ~ r _ ,and other public areas by fences, berms, or landscaping. _ - 7.. Adequate trash storage areas shall be provided. There - h ~ shall beyear-round access to all trash storage areas which shall not be used for any other purpose. - 8 - Mail delivery shall be provided for in accordance with the ~ _ ~ ~ d i6? - provisions of Ordinance #40 of 1981. ~ ~ ; , G. Circulation/access. r J 4 . 1. ;There shall be provided an on-site vehicular circulation _ ~ _ , system which shall coordinate with- adjacent streets to ' _ - . 454i tvai~ t-?i-see I _ ZONING _ minimize congestion and adverse impact upon the general _ traffic circulation pattern in the area. ~ _ - 2. Projects shall provide adequate layout design of parking areas with respect to location and dimension of vehicular . _ , . ~ . . and pedestrian entrances and exits, building locations, , , walkways and recreational trails. 3... Proper vehicle sight distances shall exist at each access point to a public street. H. Satellite dish antennas. - It is the purpose of these guidelines to ensure that tha . visibility of a satellite dish antenna from any public . right-of-way or adjacent properties be reduced to the highest degree possible. It shall be the burden of the _ . - applicant to demonstrate how the satellite dish antenna _ installations complies with these guidelines. The - guidelines work in concert with regulations outlined in , Section 18.58.320 of Vail Municipal Code. The following guidelines shall be used by the design review board in _ evaluating applications for satellite dish antennas: . . 1. All wiring and cable related to a satellite dish , antenna shall be installed underground. - - 2. The use of mesh satellite dish antennas is highly encouraged because of their ability to be more s: sensitively integrated on a site or structure. 3:" 'The use of appropriate colors shall be required to _ . provide for a more sensitive installation when _ _ integrating a satellite dish antenna onto a site or - I~ structure. Color selection for a satellite dish antenna should be made with res ect to s ecific - - P P characteristics on a site or structure. Unpainted surfaces and satellite dish antennas with reflective ~ - -surfaces shall not be allowed. E ` 4. Locations of satellite dish antennas shall be made so as to ensure that the satellite dish antenna is screened , ~ from view from any public right-of--way or adjacent ~ e - _ _ property to the highest degree possible. In addition , to effective site planning, screening a satellite dish - ' _ 5, antenna ma be accom lished throw h the use of ' Y P 8 h landscaping materials, fencing, existing structures, ,y , tVxit 1-21-86) 454j ~ . 4' 4 4, _ iir- 3. 3? DESIGN REVIEW _ sub-grade placements or other means that both - screen the satcllite dish antenna and do not appear , unnatural on the site. ~ r . r S. Satellite dish antcnnas on or attached to existing _ structures shall be permitted provided the satellite - , dish antcnna is architecturally integrated into the structure. Effective use of color shall be required to ensure compatibility between the satcllite dish . antenna and existing structure. The use of a mesh _ _ material shall be strongly encouraged when - attempting to integrate a satellite dish antenna onto an existing structure. - 6. Landscaping or other site improvements intended to screen a satellite dish antenna proposed on any application shall be complctcd prior to the issuance of a building permit to install a satellite dish antenna. A letter of credit equal to one hundred twenty-five percent of the costs of installing landscaping or sift improvements may be submitted to the Town • of Vail if seasonal weather conditions prohibit the installation of Landscaping or site improvements. - _ 7. All improvements required by the design review board for the purpose of reducing the visibility of satellite dish antennas shall remain in place so long _ - as the satellite dish antennas remain in place unless - . permission to alter or remove said improvements is - - .obtained from the design review board. All satellite r ~ _ _ - _ dish antennas and all improvements required by the - - - - - ' design review board to reduce the visibility of , , - satcllite dish antennas shall be adequately maintained _ : ,a• _ _ , and repaired and shall not be allowed to become ;,t; _ - _ dilapidated or fall into a state of disrcpatr Dt~plex,and primary/secondary`developtncnt: -~'!Y" • The` purpose of this section into ensure that duplex ~ - and primaryJsecondary development be designed in a . manner that creates an architecturally integrated _ - structure with unified site development. Dwelling _ ~ . 454j- I _ - ZONIi\'G F' units and garages shall be designed within asingle - A~ structure, except as set forth in 18.04.050 I,2 thereof, - Y with the use of unified architectural and landscape I° design. A single structure shall have common roofs - - and building walls that create enclosed space substan- - tially above grade. Unified architectural and land- ' scape design shall include, but not be limited to, the - . - use of compatible building materials, architectural = style, scale, roof forms, massing, architectural details, site grading and landscape materials and features. The presence of significant site constraints may permit the physical separation of units and garages on a site. The determination of whether or not a lot ~ has significant site constraints shall be made by the t. design review board. Significant site constraints shall be defined as natural features of a lot such as stands of mature trees, natural drainages, stream courses f:-_e and other natural water features, rock outcroppings, _ wetlands, other natural features, and existing struc- ~ ~ ; - tures that may create practical difficulties in the site - planning and development of a lot. Slope may be • ~ considered a physical site constraint that allows for the separation of a garage from a unit. It shall be the - applicant's responsibility to request a determination - from the design review board as to whether or not a - site has significant site constraints before final design - - g,, work on the project is presented. This determination shall be made at a conceptual review of the proposal s - " . • • based on review of the site, a detailed survey of the - - ' - t lot (to include information as outlined in Section ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ y: 18.54.040 C,1 a.) and a preliminary site plan of the - ~ - rY; proposed structure(s). j.~~" .The duplex and primaryJsecondary development - ~ .;~E_''~ ~a ~ ~ may be designed to accommodate the development of dwelling units and garages in more than one ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G = ~ i` : _ ; structure if the design review board determines that 6;.~.- ,.r~ t : ~+s significant site constraints exist on the lot. The use of `:4 + unified architectural and landscape design as outlined s to Section 18.54.050 H,l. shall be required for the 454j-2 _ . _ k t` • Q: DESIGN REVIEW _ ' ~ development. In addition, the design review board may require that one or more of the following _ common design elements such as fences, walls, _ - patios, decks, retaining walls, walkways, landscape _ - - elements, or other architectural features be incorpo- _ . - rated to create tmified site development. (Ord. 46(1991) 2, 3: Ord. 12(1988) § 2: Ord. 24(1985) § I: Ord. 9(1985) 2, 3: Ord.39(1983) § 1.) ti _ 18.54.051 Park design guidelines. _ A. Purpose. These guidelines shall be used by the design review board in reviewing any proposals for the devclopment of Town of Vail park land. The guidclincs shall be used in conjunction with the general design review guidelines found - in Section 18.54.050 of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. It is the intent of these guidelines to leave as much design freedom as possible to the individual designer while at the same time encouraging park development that will complement the natural beauty of our park land. The s; - purpose of the guidelines is to provide continuity in the - character of the parks which will be developed over many years. The guidclincs will provide consistent design criteria _ to maintain the quality of Town of Vail parks through all phases of devclopment. .B. Building materials and design. ~ 1. General. a. Natural materials are strongly encouraged in park 6. construction. Materials and detailing must complement the park's environment as well as be functional and attractive. ~ ~ . . b. Materials and designs should be chosen that are - economical to maintain. 2. Stone. y 9'' a. Natural rock should be used for architectural features such as exposed building walls and small _ retaining walls. Sandy gray and brown colors are _ encouraged, as they blend in with the natural . . - environment. Construction should minimize exposed 454j-2a (VaD 1-8.91) i e f s of ZONING _ mortar and detailing should reflect concern for local t . , ; . • climatic conditions. - ~ - ~ - 3. Pedestrian walks/plazas.-. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ « ~ - ~ ~ ' a. Impervious surfacing' may. be--used `to" emphasi2e ' ~ - ° important features or pedestrian areas. Natural ' ~ ~ ~ ` • t- - - - materials and colors arc encouraged; as they blend in : ' ~ - ~ _ - . well with wood, stone and plant materials:- Asphalt is = ~ ~ ~ • - ~ discouraged except when necessary for bike paths = and parking areas. - - - - ,.fie r~ t f _ _ , r - , ~r - :-a[: , 1. .t;. 3.2`: re, r fi -m„.v ~ ~4 . ' . ~"~c~i'~F'3 _._.:`a3, ,=T~.*i,..e'iiGi:sfs',,.,, '..a.: _ 3- s- ' 4S4j-2b - _ ems: ~ - ~ RECEIVED MAR Z 3 1993 y- s 9Fr~ LAW OFFICES • ~ DUNN, ABPLANALP & CHRISTENSEN, P.C. xc. [,~E A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JOHN W. DUNN VAIL NATIONAL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE: ARTHUR A. ABPLANALP, JR. SUITE 3OO (303) 476-7552 ALLEN C. CHRISTENSEN LAWRENCE P. HARTLA UB 108 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WEST TELECOPIER: DIANE L. HERMAN VAIL, COLORADO 81657 (303) 476-4765 SPECIAL COUNSEL: JER RV W. HANNAH 23 March 1993 Town Council of the Town of Vail and the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail Vail CO HAND DELIVERED Re: Application of Loper Construction Services, Inc. Lot 15, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch This Office represents Mr. and Mrs. George Wiegers and Mr. and Mrs. Andy Daly in association with the application of Loper Construction Services, Inc., on behalf of the owner, William Loper, to construct a second dwelling on Lot 15, Block 1, Vail Potato Patch (in addition to the dwelling now under construction), and with their effort to be certain that the construction of that second residence is of a nature which is consistent with the use of and construction on the adjoining properties, and with the ability of the residents of the neighborhood to enjoy the experience which has been characteristic of Potato Patch in the past. Mr. and Mrs. Wiegers and Mr. and Mrs. Daly are the owners of two of the properties adjacent to the development site which is the subject of the Loper application. The Town of Vail Department of Community Development and the Vail Design Review Board have determined that the proposal and plans for a primary residence to be located on the above property conform with the requirements of the Town of Vail Municipal Code. Mr. and Mrs. Wievers and Mr. and Mrs. Daly disagree with those determinations. By this letter, Mr. and Mrs. Wiegers and Mr. and Mrs. Daly appeal to the Planning and Environmental Commission of the Town of Vail and the Town Council of the Town of Vail both the determination that the apyplication of Loper Construction Services, Inc., is in conformity with zoning and other land use requirements of the Town of Vail and the approval of the subject flans and the application of Loper Construction Services, Inc. by the Department of Community Development and the Vail Design Review Board. The Vail Design Review Board considered the application of Loper Construction Services, Inc., on the 17th of March. Some administrative decisions were apparently made the day before that hearing, but it is our understanding that no administrative decisions were made regarding the current proposal prior to the 15th of March, which was the first working day after the current plans were delivered to our clients. This appeal is, therefore, being filed within ten days of any determination, whether by the Vail Department of Community Development or the Vail Town Council. During the Design Review Board hearing, a number of aspects of the project were the subject of objections of our clients. Some of those objections were considered, but others were not considered, based upon the Design Review Board's decisions that the subject matter of those objections were administrative determinations of the staff of the Department of Community Development and not within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board. The question of whether various aspects of this process were within the discretion of the Design Review Board, and therefore subject only to appeal to the Town Council, or were exclusively administrative decisions of staff, and therefore subject only to appeal to the Planning and Environmental Commission, is unclear. In order to be certain that there can be no later argument on the part of the Town of Vail that the proper avenue of appeal has not been followed, the purpose of this letter is to appeal both the determinations of the staff of the Department of Community Development and the decision of the Vail Design Review Board. Both appeals extend to all alleged errors, and, to the extent the respective review bodies of the Town of Vail wish to limit or divide their review of the various determinations, that may be done, subject, of course, to further appeal. Most of the specifics of objections, and the bases for the appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Wiegers and Mr. and Mrs. Daly, were included in two letters previously submitted to the Design Review Board and the Department of Community Development. For the convenience of the Council and the Planning and Environmental Commission, the principle objections are generally consolidated within this appeal, although the appellants reiterate, in association with this appeal, any and all other objections included in the two previous letters to the Town of Vail for the purpose of preserving their rights to assert those deficiencies on further appeal. Other violations of Vail Municipal Code requirements were disclosed during the Design Review Board hearing. At this time, the following facts are central to requirement for the disapproval of the proposal and plans submitted by Loper Construction Services, Inc.: 1. Uncertainty Reaardinq GRFA and Compliance With Other Land Use Regulations. The proposal and plan considered by the Design Review Board was apparently received by the Town of Vail not more than two days prior to the hearing. Because of the limited time 2 available, the staff of the Department of Community Development did not have an opportunity to review the GRFA of the building, or, apparently, other zoning aspects of the project, prior to the Design Review Board hearing, and therefore objectors had no opportunity to consider the question of GRFA or other zoning compliance in association with zoning requirements, mass, or any other aspect of the design review guidelines. The Vail Municipal Code requires, at Section 18.54.040.0.2. as follows: The department of community development shall check all material submitted for design review for compliance with applicable provisions of the zoning code, subdivision regulations, and with Section 18.54.0400. If the application is found to be in compliance with the zoning code,. subdivision regulations, and with Section 18.54.0400. the project shall be placed upon the agenda of the next appropriately scheduled meeting in accordance with the required application submittal deadlines on file in the community development department. (Emphasis added.) The Loper application had not, in fact, been reviewed for compliance with the zoning code prior to the time it was forwarded to the Design Review Board. It seems obvious, therefore, that the project could not have been found to be in compliance with the zoning code prior to the Design Review Board hearing. Consideration of the application by the Design Review Board was, therefore, premature and in violation of the Vail Municipal Code. 2. Previous Representation and Reliance Upon Location and Size of Building and Building Envelope. In the fall of 1992, the applicant submitted to the Town of Vail a plan for a single family residence to be located on the above property. That proposal identified an approximate location of a second residence (which is the residence now on appeal), which was to be a primary residence in a primary/secondary configuration. The building envelope identified for the future primary residence was approximately 36' x 38', or 1368 square feet. Both the Design Review Board and the residents who participated in that hearing relied upon that representation and an associated model in approving and/or accepting, respectively (without further appeal), the plan for the first residence to be constructed. The proposal which is now before the Design Review Board calls for the future primary residence to occupy a building envelope approximately 36' x 65' , or 2340 square feet, an increase of approximately 70$. Copies of the two building envelopes are attached to this letter, for convenient reference. The apparent goal of the developer is to maximize the GRFA, at approximately 3750 square feet, for the residence under consideration. The effect of this proposed change on the neighborhood is dramatic and adverse. The Department of Community 3 r Development and the Design Review Board have determined that the applicant need not conform the proposed second phase of the project with that earlier representation made by the applicant, and that determination is one decision from which this appeal is taken. It should be obvious that it is not necessary to occupy a 2340 square foot building envelope in order to generate a 3750 square foot residence on a three-story floor plan. Even allowing 425 square feet for mechanical space and 600 square feet for a garage, the resulting total of 4350 square feet can be constructed on a building envelope of approximately 36' x 40', with 25' less lateral impact than the current proposal. It should, perhaps, be noted that, within the design now under consideration, a total of 750 square feet of space, representing 600 on the lower level and 150 on the upper level, is being wasted, the former being identified as "crawl space" and the latter being square footage without a floor, two stories high, above the dining area, being identified as "void under roof". The building mass is increased by one-fifth (750/3750) without justification, but with significant impact. In view of the fact that it is possible to accommodate the maximum GRFA on approximately the building envelope represented to the Design Review Board and adjacent property owners during the fall of 1992, it is both appropriate and necessary that the newly proposed construction be confined to that envelope which was originally represented to the Vail Department of Community Development, the Design Review Board, and adjacent property owners to be the location of the second structure. 3. Violation of Zoning Height Limitation. The structure now proposed is clearly in violation of the zoning height limitation for the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District. The Vail Municipal Code establishes the height limitation for the Primary/Secondary Residential Zone District at Section 18.13.075, which states as follows: For a f lat roof or a mansard roof , the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty feet. For a sloping roof, the height of buildings shall not exceed thirty-three feet. At Section 18.04.170 the Vail Municipal Code describes the manner in which the measurement is to occur as follows: "Height" means the distance measured vertically, from the existing grade or finished grade (whichever is more restrictive), at any given point to the top of a flat roof, or mansard roof or to the highest ridge line of a sloping roof. (Emphasis added) 4 The maximum permitted elevation roof ridge of the primary residence is 33 feet. The elevation of the roof ridge on the proposed primary unit is 37 feet, which represents an increase of 3.5 feet over the earlier proposal. Based upon measurements noted on the west elevation of the two plans for the proposed residence, the following comparisons can be made: Original Revised Increase Elevation of roof ridge 139.5' 143.0' 3.5' Elevation of roof eve 132.5' 136.0' 3.5' Elevation of Level 3 123.5 126.0 2.5 Elevation of Level 2 114.5 116.0 1.5 Elevation of Level 1 105.5 106.0 0.5 It seems apparent that the height of each level of the residence increased by 1.0 foot during the evolution toward the revised plans. At the Design Review Board hearing, the applicant confirmed the fact that ceilings had been increased from 8-foot ceilings to 9- foot ceilings (with the exception of the 19-foot ceiling in the dining area). The roof ridge height under the current proposal would be 4 feet in excess of the roof ridge height permitted under the zoning code. The staff of the Department of Community Development stated that, notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.04.170 noted above, the Department's practice on roofs of the design incorporated into the Loper project was to measure from the grade elevation to the eave of the roof, rather than to the ridge of the roof. That decision, which the Design Review Board refused to reconsider or review, was in direct violation of the Vail Municipal Code. Whether based upon the problems with the original proposal addressed in our earlier letter, or those noted above, it seems apparent that the developer's desire to maximize GRFA can be accommodated within the building envelope identified by the developer and relied upon by the Design Review Board almost six months ago. It was stated during an earlier Design Review Board hearing that the Design Review Board would not have approved the first building if the Board had then been given an accurate presentation of the developer's intentions associated with the second residence. There having been an approval by the Design Review Board of the first residence based upon a representation regarding the location and mass of the second residence, and the Design Review and adjacent property owners having relied upon that representation, the developer can and should be compelled to carry forward with the project based upon that original representation. 4. Absence of a Model. When the application for the original dwelling was before the Design Review Board in the Fall of 1992, the applicant presented a model intended to illustrate the intended construction. The Design Review Board relied upon the model, as well as the plans establishing the intended building 5 I envelope for the second dwelling, at that time. Although a new proposal has been submitted to the Design Review Board, and despite the representation to the and adjacent property owners that a model would be available in order that an evaluation of the new proposal might be possible for both the Design Review Board and interested neighbors, a new model was never made available. 5. Ineffective Staking and Inspection. Although the boundaries of the revised proposal, which were changed from the previous proposal as to the location of both the building and the associated improvements, were briefly staked on the morning of the Design Review Board hearing, those stakes were removed almost immediately after the Design Review Board left the site, and adjacent property owners could not review the proposed location of the building prior to the Design Review Board hearing. No effort whatever was made to demonstrate the height of the proposed structure. Further, according to the statements made during the Design Review Board hearing, the Board did not walk up to the site to view the staking, but rather looked at the site from Potato Patch Drive or adjacent to Potato Patch Drive. Because of the dramatic difference in elevation, and the fact that both Potato Patch Drive and the adjacent boundary of the lot are well below the area of proposed construction, no effective or good faith review of either the staking or the impact of the project could have been accomplished unless the staking had been viewed from the area of the lot where the staking occurred, or from the adjoining properties on the same side of Potato Patch Drive. Although it might ordinarily be argued that members of the Design Review Board had seen the site during the previous consideration, in this instance only one member of the current Design Review Board was a member of the Board which considered the earlier submittals. 6. Violations of Design Review Guidelines. The proposal approved by the Design Review Board required disapproval because of its failure to satisfy the design review guidelines. That failure of the proposal to meet the tests imposed by the design review guidelines is apparent in a specific comparison of the proposed project to those guidelines. The design review guidelines have, among their criteria, the following considerations: 18.54.050.A.1 Structure shall be compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and with Vail's environment Compatibility can be achieved through the proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, materials and colors, and the compliance with the guidelines herein contained. 18.54.050.A.2. Any building site in Vail is likely to have its own unique land forms and features. Whenever 6 possible, these existing features should be preserved and reinforced by new construction. The objective is to fit the buildings to their sites in a way that leaves the natural land forms and features intact, treating the buildings as an integral part of the site, rather than as isolated objects at odds with their surroundings. 18.54.OSO.B.1. The location and configuration of structures and access ways shall be responsive to the existing topography of the site upon which they are to be located. Grading requirements resulting from development shall be designed to blend into the existing or natural landscape. Any cuts or fills shall be sculptural in form and contoured to blend with the existing natural undisturbed terrain within the property boundary. 18.54.050.B.2. Building siting and access thereto shall be responsive to existing features of terrain, rock outcroppings, drainage patterns, and vegetation. a. Massinq. The project is, perhaps, most clearly in conflict with the design review guidelines based upon its incompatibility with the surroundings, particularly with respect to its scale and proportions, which might be referred to as its "massing". The project appears to be little more or less than two extremely large concrete blocks sitting on the site of the hill, although with the modification of the third floor of the primary dwelling that appearance might more accurately be described as a "chipped" block. b. Terrain. The design review guidelines require that development proposals recognize and deal appropriately with terrain. In this case, the terrain is not appropriately considered. To suggest that the terrain was ignored would be generous. In comparison with the proposal approved in the Fall of 1992, the improvements for the second building, including the entryway and front retaining wall, had been moved 16 feet closer to Potato Patch Drive, with the entryway, retaining walls, and balconies actually encroaching into the front set-back. The project goes so far as to "fight" the terrain by imposing a retaining wall behind the first building and by the use of a dramatic retaining wall facing the street, which, with the residence itself, creates a 30-foot high south face of the structure, including the proposed retaining wall serving the entry. The presentation to those traveling Potato Patch Drive of such a facade twenty feet from the property line (closer with respect to balconies and retaining walls) cannot be considered to be in compliance with the design review guidelines. Indeed, persons travelling down Potato Patch Drive and residents viewing the 7 property from the west will have a view little different from that of a loading dock of a commercial structure. Although such a design facilitates maximizing the size of the structure without demonstrating imagination or the willingness to make an appropriate investment in design variations, it does not meet with either the letter or the spirit of the design review process. c. Proximity to Adiacent Properties. The proposed project also conflicts with the design review guidelines with respect to the effect of the project on the east property line and the relationship of the proposed structure to that property line. On the west property line, the original structure was appropriately set back approximately 20 feet from the property line at the closest corner, 5 feet in excess of that required by the setback regulation applicable to the zone district. On the east property line, however, the developer now proposes not only to abut the property line but to have a building mass 65 feet long adjacent to that property line over the entire distance. Although the building envelope originally identified suggested that development would occur against that property line, as is the current proposal, the distance which was affected was only approximately 38 feet, and the impact was significantly less than the 65 feet incorporated into the proposal now before the Design Review Board. Although the developer may be permitted to construct improvements on a property within the setback line, the design review process is intended to protect adjacent property owners against being, quite literally, "faced" with a mass of construction directly adjacent to one's property. The breadth of the project, extending from the northwest corner of the first building to the southeast corner of the proposed second building, has been increased to exceed 120 feet, more than half of which is directly adjacent to the east property line and without effective vertical relief. d. Drainage. The change in drainage patterns created by the construction also fails to satisfy the requirements of the design review guidelines that the plan be responsive to existing drainage patterns, and, we must assume, drainage patterns created by the construction. The configuration of residences and the driveway creates one of two scenarios. If the run-off is diverted around the residences which will span virtually the entire width of the lot, which seems most likely, it seems apparent that much if not all of that run-off will be diverted to the east, across the property of Mr. and Mrs. Daly and down their driveway. If run-off somehow reaches the driveway of the Loper residence, that driveway structure will effectively operate as a funnel, collecting all drainage from the upper part of the lot ( indeed, the portion of the mountain above the lot, as well) and deposit that drainage on the street directly across from the residence of Mr. and Mrs. Wiegers. Because of the lack of a crown in the construction of Potato Patch 8 Drive, water draining from the upper side of the road is not confined to the drainage system on that side of Potato Patch Drive. Water flows across the road onto the lower properties, such as that of Mr. and Mrs. Wiegers, which has required corrective action in the past. The type of concentrated diversion created by the Loper project would only aggravate that situation. e. General Impact. The effect of the proposed project upon the adjoining properties was to have been a principle consideration before the Design Review Board. The analysis in its entirely should have been a consolidated review of the various concerns which have otherwise been identified, but should have given consideration to the aggregate effect of the various impacts, rather than simply reviewing each individually. One concern might be passed over or minimized if it were the only concern, but the impact as a whole upon adjacent properties and the neighborhood requires extensive revision of the plan in order to meet the goals and objectives of the design review guidelines and process. Without such a revision, the impact upon the adjoining property owners will be so aggravated that there will be no opportunity or method to eliminate or mitigate the impact of the project as a whole. Under some circumstances, it has been possible to mitigate the impact of a project of this nature by providing vegetation or other visual relief. In this case, however, the manner in which the proposed building is located, adjacent to (and in fact overhanging) the setback line, effectively eliminates any possibility of such mitigation other than within the 15 foot setback. Even the proposed landscape plan, involving largely deciduous trees, does not seem to recognize the effect of the stark facades on the adjacent properties. Absent the requirement from the Design Review board that the developer address and correct the deficiencies, adjacent property owners will be looking at a 37-foot high wall and roof structure from the west, at a 37-foot high building fifteen feet from the property line on the east, and a +30-foot high combination of retaining wall and building wall from the south. 7. Other Objections. Other objections which are contained in the letters previously submitted, to the extent those objections have been overruled by the staff of the Department of Community Development, are also the subject of this appeal, and those objections are incorporated by reference. 8. Conclusion. The premature consideration of the Loper application, without zoning review, the mass of the proposed structure, its proximity to Potato Patch Drive, its configuration on the terrain, its height, and the GRFA proposed to be constructed violate either the letter or the intent, or both, of the design review regulations and the zoning code of the Town of Vail. 9 Although the applicant has made modifications to the proposed structure, the applicant indicates that it is determined to maximize the GRFA of the structure, and the submittal indicates that, while this goal might be achieved within the building envelope originally planned, that will not be done. The determinations that the proposed structure is in conformity with Vail design review guidelines and the zoning regulations of the Town of Vail are in error and require reversal of the approvals granted by the staff of the Department of Community Development and the Vail Design Review Board. The Town of Vail been the object of criticism as a result of permitting developers to maximize building square footage using unrelieved architectural faces on Forest Road. There is no reason to repeat that experience to the detriment of the residents of the Potato Patch area. The proposal which is before the Town of Vail at this time should be disapproved, and the developers should be directed to develop a design consistent with the project approved in the Fall of 1992, with the representations previously made, and consistent with the zoning regulations and the design review guidelines of the Town of Vail. The consideration by the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Town Council of the Town of Vail, of the objections of the residents of the Potato Patch neighborhood, and the reversal of the approval by the Department of Community Development and the Vail Design Review Board, would be greatly appreciated by your constituents, whose protection is, after all, the goal of the zoning regulations and the design review process. ry truly rs, DUNN, ABP ALP CHR ST N P.C hur A. Abplanalp r. AAA,jr Enclosures xc: Mr. and Mrs. George Wiegers Mr. and Mrs. Andy Daly 10 . / , ~ ~`w.. 4^ . ' ~ ice/ ~ j 1 ~ ~ , ~ N ~ - a CG tom, ~L ~ ~ .tom `v ,t. r a ~'~„t~~ ''1+~~.. ` r,,_ ter,..}. ~ ~ / \ti \ ~I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 _ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ( J ~ / ~ ~ j ~ - ~ 1_ ~ ~ U~~#- paves ~ ~ + ~ , ~ ~ ~ /.1 , ~ ~ ` 1` • \ ` • 1 • • ` \ I I .105 _ _ ~ ` ` ' - ~ ``"~ts~ ~ ~ f • ~ / ~ ~ • ~ I~~hTED~ ~ }eve ~ _ ~ ~ RECEIVED APR " 6 193 _ - AVON MEDICAL CENTER ~~s ° 71 BEAVER CREEK PLACE X C , P.O. BOX 1142 AVON, COLORADO 81620 L.fJ TELEPHONE (303) 948-3222 / G ?f~ FwX (303) 949-4047 / April 6, 1993 Town of Vail Town of Vail Town Council 75 So. Frontage Rd. West Vail, CO. 81657 Re: Loper Residence DRB Appeal - Building Application Lot 15 - Potato Patch Drive Dear Council Members: We are writing as concerned neighbors regarding the building application ("application") for the above mentioned property/residence and the Design Review Board approval of the application. We live at 789 Potato Patch Drive, diagonally across the street from the Loper property. Phil Freedman has lived there T3 years and Karen Josephson has lived there 7 years. We attended the two most recent Design Review Board meetings wherein the residence was approved as submitted. We have several concerns about the proposed residence and the Design Review Process as follows: 1. The existing and proposed structures are massive, stark, overbearing and out of proportion with existing structures in the neighborhood. 2. The proposed height of the cut bank and southern wall which sits right on the set back line is greater than 35 feet. Looking up the wall from the street level imposes an enormous structure to passers-by and neighbors disproportionate with other structures in the neighborhood. Its stark nature and its location on the uphill side of the street amplify the features of this particularly massive structure. 3. The height of the primary structure is four (4) feet higher than the regulations allow. If the height of the existing secondary structure was calculated in the same manner, it may also be taller than allowed. 4. The proposed landscaping has not effectively mitigated our concerns about this imposing structure in our neighborhood and its effect on our property values. 5. Probably most disturbing concerning the occurrence of this problem is the process whereby the DRB has approved this structure. At the first DRB meeting we attended Georg Lamb stated that the new proposed primary unit, which was twice as big as the initial representation, would not have been approved had it been submitted in its present form when the secondary structure was approved. The DRB consistently stated that the building code allowed one (1) structure, not two and not two hooked together. If this is so one building should be presented and approved, irrespective of the owners intention of building the structure in phases. There is something fundamentally wrong with a process that allows the applicant to achieve through the back door what could not have been or would not have been approved in the first instance. 6. There also has been little or no notice given to adjacent property owners of any hearings regarding this property. Indeed, the primary foot print was taped only for a few hours before it was taken down. We only happened to see the tape because an article was left at home and Karen went home to retrieve it mid-morning. We regret we are not able to attend the TOV Council meeting this evening because of lack of notice and previous commitments. We are hopeful the Town Council will consider our concerns in their review of the Loper residence. We feel our concerns are similar to the concerns of other neighbors who have not had input into the process. We are hopeful the design review process may be corrected and improved by our input, and that the immediate structure as proposed would not be allowed. Sincerely, Karen L. Josephson C_ 0-x;2 ~~j`- Phil E. Freedman, MD VRIL Mh1T MEDICAL PC ID~303-476-8976 RPR 06'93 16 26 No .025 P.02 " ~ ~ ~ ~ . ice- Cr ~ 6w~,,~,(.41~i ~ ~ , i . .~uCo ~ ~,1 c9~ ~i L ~ G,~. "`Vi`i C°~ r ~ L~~Z. fir. ...t n r~p~ ~ i~' . f , . ' OPT P~L~ C M~~ ~y TOWN OF VAIL ~ 7S South Frontage Road Department of Community Development = bail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2138 / 479-2139 March 24, 1993 Mr. Emil Rothlisberger Jack Roth Company, Inc. 7921 South Park Plaza, Suite 102 Littleton, CO 80120 RE: Spraddle Creek Subdivision Dear Emil: On March 17, 1993, the Town of Vail's Design Review Board (DRB) unanimously granted final - design approval for the Spraddle Creek Subdivision. This approval was similar to the approval granted by the DRB in 1991, and included the following: 1) Subdivision landscape plan and retaining walls. 2) Architectural site development and landscape guidelines -for residences. 3) Subdivision lighting standards and lot monument lighting. F 4) Subdivision entrance sign, directory sign and individual lot monument signs (residential name plates). - i The DRB's approval included the following modifications to the project: r 1) That the sizes of the aspen trees, to be located at the intersection of the main subdivision road with the North Frontage Road, shall vary in size from 2 inch to 3 inch diameter. 2) That the Residential Design Regulations include language regarding the maximum height for retaining walls within the front setback of the residential lots. F 3) That the Residential Design Guidelines include language regarding the current Town of Vail Fireplace Ordinance. . 4) That the Residential Design Guidelines include the Town of Vail's regulations regarding residential driveway grades. k; k+ f l T - ~ y Mr. Rothlisberger March 24, 1993 Page Two On March 23, 1993, the Town Council "called-up" the DRB decision for further review. This review will occur at the April 6th Council meeting, which begins at 7:30 p.m. The final plat review will also occur at this meeting. The staff is currently in the process of reviewing the Subdivision Improvements Agreement, which needs to be finalized before the final plat can be approved by the Town Council. Should this document require any changes or modifications, I will bring those items to your attention immediately. If you should have any questions or comments on any of the. above, please do not hesitate to contact me at 479-2138. Sincerely, Mike Mollica Assistant Director of Planning xc: Jay Peterson Kristan Pritz Greg Hall w: MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board FROM: Mike Mollica/Department of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1993 SUBJECT: The Spraddle Creek Subdivision n^:'~?4}i%L+.t?Cii::?w::: iii::;: iiii':i.y;: :w.bi; w: •}v-:.,;i.;; v ......................:n..~..n....•v...s:.i.w%r::•i:?:i:^'fv::~iii'r'::: ii:.: i::w:.~.~n~ i...-k: t: r:.:::.~::: ~::::::::::::::::::::v:::. u r.. ..r .........................n...... ::::v :v: n.... n::.::: A . . n..:, v:::::::::::. m:::: x:: :w :::v.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: n_::: is x:: :vim: :..~w::::::::::::.~•:::}i:{Li~iT}i?iii: iiii?i:Liii'r 4]i:: ••iv, 3•+;{•;~i};~ r...... . v rt:.;:;i::?:.~ii::•i'-:•ii ii:iii...................::':'ii'.: n• : . n......... r... x...... ii: w x:: x::: x:.~.~: r:~::: '.....xu r.xn.ri~ ."•:YirY•.. nn......... - v r: x:::-::: x:::: .s~. x.4 .r......... 'v.~ii The Design Review Board granted final design approval for the Spraddle Creek Subdivision on April 17, 1991. The Spraddle Creek Subdivision review was divided into four sections, with the DRB specifically voting on each section of the project. A summary of the 1991 DRB approvals is listed in the attached letter to Joe Macy (Vail Associates) from Kristan Pritz, dated April 18, 1991, and is attached to this memorandum. Listed below is an outline of the four sections which were reviewed: 1. Subdivision Landscape Plan and Retaining Walls. 2. Ar~i~itectural Sife Development and Landscape Guidelines -for residences. 3. Subdivision Lighting Standards and Lot Monument Lighting. 4. Signage: •Subdivision Entrance Sign; •Directory Sign; •Individual Lot Monument Signs (Residential Nameplates). t The DRB approvals noted above were valid for a period of one year, and subsequently expired on April 17, 1992. Recently, the Spraddle Creek Subdivision has changed ownership, and the current owner is the SBC Development Corporation (a Colorado Corporation). SBC is represented by Emil Rothlisberger, (Jack Roth Company), and Jay Peterson. At this time, the new owners of the Spraddle Creek Subdivision are not proposing to modify the previously approved project in any manner. However, because the 1991 DRB approval ' has expired, it is necessary for the current owners to again obtain DRB approval prior to construction of the Subdivision's infrastructure. The request before the DRB today is for final design approval of the four categories listed above. r FILE COPY - ~ ; town of uail 75 south frontage road office of community development vail, Colorado 81657 (303) 479-2138 (303} 479-2139 April 18, 1991 Mr. Joe Macy Vail Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Vail, Colorado 81658 Re: Final Design Review Board Approval for Spraddle Creek Subdivision Dear Joe: Congratulations on your approvals for Spraddle Creek Subdivision at the Design Review Board (DRB) meeting on April 17, 1991. Below is a summary of the approvals: 1. Subdivision Landscape Plan and Retaining Walls: Subdivision landscape plan and retaining walls were approved with the condition that additional landscaping be provided where Gillett Road intersects the Frontage Road. The additional landscaping must be approved by staff and Sherry Dorward. The motion was made by George Lamb with a second by Jim Shearer. The motion passed to approve the plan 5-0. 2. Architectural and Landscape Guidelines: Architectural and landscape guidelines were approved with the following conditions: A. Please put a title on the urban wild fire graphic. B. Please label the home types to indicate what they demonstrate for architectural style. Small sketches should be used for architectural details as opposed to a photo of a house. You may also wish to show some details of architectural styles which are prohibited. Mr. Joe Macy - April 18, 1991 Page 2 C. The architectural guidelines need to be amended so that tennis courts are prohibited within the subdivision. D. The roof color range should be specified. tt was indicated at the meeting that the subdivision would most likely have brown tones for roof materials. E. Specifics on lighting for individual lots should be provided in the guidelines. The Board felt the existing wording should be reworded so that exterior lighting is minimal and the "moon shadow" tree lighting is discouraged. The motion to approve was made by George Lamb and seconded by Sherry Dorward. The vote was 5-0. 3. Subdivision Liahtina Standard and Lot Monument Lighting: The plans prepared by Pierce, Segerberg & Spaeh Architects, dated December 31, 1990, indicate the approved lot monument-option A and subdivision lighting fixture. The streetlights will be maintained by the Spraddle Creek Homeowners Association. Five lights are approved. The rock for the lot monuments and sign fixtures shall be the rainbow style rock indicated in the cut sheet provided by the applicant. The motion was made by George Lamb and seconded by Pat Herrington. The motion passed 5-0 to approve the lighting proposal. 4. Sianaae: The signage that was approved for the subdivision included the lot monuments, two directory signs and a subdivision sign at the entry gate onto the subdivision. The lot monuments will meet Section 16.20.130 of the sign code, which is attached. The subdivision entrance sign shall meet Section 16.20.150 of the sign code. Shrubs and annuals should be added at the base of the directory signs. The directories should also be coordinated with lighting in these locations. At this time, directories are proposed at the Frontage Road entrance to the subdivision, as well as the cul de sac adjacent to the livery road. The brass sign at the intersection of Gillett Road and the subdivision is not approved. A lettering style and logo per the submittal were also approved. The motion to approve was made by George Lamb and seconded by Pat Herrington. The motion passed 5-0. Joe, I appreciate all your efforts to coordinate this submittal. I know it was a lot of information to compile. I also appreciate your diligence in making changes to the guidelines per our Board and staff requests. Good luck with your project. Sincerely, ~ Kristan Pritz Community Development Director _ /ab Enclosures PUBLIC NOTICE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE (as of 4/1/93) APRIL, 1993 In an attempt to respond to scheduled meeting demands, as well as adhere to mandated ordinance and charter requirements, Council meetings are scheduled at the following times: EVENING MEETINGS Evening meetings will continue to be held on the first and third Tuesday evenings of each month, starting at ?:30 P.M. These meetings will provide a forum for citizen participation and public audience for conducting regular Council business. WORK SESSIONS Work sessions, which are primarily scheduled for Council debate and understanding of issues before the Council, will now be scheduled to begin at 2:00 P.M. (unless otherwise noted) on the alternating Tuesday afternoons, i.e., the second, and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Unless otherwise noted, a brief overview work session for Council will precede the evening meetings, from 6:30 P.M. - 7:30 P.M. ~t~tilt; APRIL, 1993, VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE u IS AS~FOLLOWS: Tuesday. April 6, 1993 Special Work session...... 10:00 A.M. Work session 5:00 P.M. Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, April 13, 1993 Work session 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) Tuesday. April 20, 1993 Work session 6:30 P.M. Evening meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday. April 27, 1993 Work session 2:00 P.M. (starting time determined by length of agenda) TOWN OF VAIL Pamela A. Brandmeyer~ Assistant to the Town Manager I