Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993-12-07 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session
VAIL TOWN COUNCIL Q{ 11 4.YES®P'& tl y ®E~6oE1tlEBEW ! y ~ .7~3 1:00 P.flH. 6Bd ~®V C®UNCIL C9iAnA~ERS ADEN®A 1. Discussion Re: Criteria for Rezoning. 2. Site Visit: Leo Payne Residence, Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing (381 Beaver Dam Circle). 3. TOV 15 Year Employee Recognition Presentation: * Mark Benson, Fire Captain. 4. Discussion Re: Council Meeting Format. 5. Discussion Re: Community Development Department Long Range Planning Priority for 1994; Update of Land Use Plan or Master Plan for the Vail Commons Site. and Adjacent Areas. 6. Discussion Re: Vail Valley Marketing Board (VVMB) Fair Share Funding. 7. Police Department Expansion Project Update. 8. 3rd Quarter Financial Report. 9. DRB Report. 10. Discussion Re: Draft Ordinance fVo. 4, Series of 1993, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.24.065 and 18.26.045, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for exterior alterations or modifications of buildings in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts; and providing details in regard thereto. 11. Information Update. 12. Council Reports. 13. Other. 14. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 15. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOItAING RiiEETING START TIi~ES BEL01N: ®O THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR UVORK SESSION IA/ILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/94/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.1161. IN TOV COUNCIL CHANflBERS. THE 6=0LL01iUING VAIL T01NN COUNCIL REGULAR VIIORK SESSION VNILL BE ON TUESDAY, 12/21/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.11f1. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAflflBERS. THE FOLLO~IIING VAIL T01NN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING IIAEETING 1~/ILL BE Old TUES®AY, 12/21/93, BEGINNING e4T 7:30 I~.Gll~l. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAII~BERS. ®4 ~ C:WGENDA.WS VAIL TOV1/fV COUNCIL 3S / ~~~,1~~ T4.DES®~Y, ®ECEMEER 7, X993 ~ :00 ~.~1. 91~ T®!! C®~9NCQ~ OF9~~IIEERS - _ EXPAN®E® ~?GE~I®A 1:00 P.M. 1. Discussion Re: Criteria for Rezoning. Kristan Pritz Tom Moorhead 1:15 P.M. 2. Site Visit: Leo Payne Residence, Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Jim Curnutte Filing (381 Seaver Dam Circle). Action Reauested of Council: View the site in preparation for discussion of Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1993, an ordinance rezoning Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family Residential zone districts. Applicant: Leo Payne. Background Rationale: Please see the Community Development Department memorandum to the PEC dated November 22, 1993. On November 22, 1993, the PEC approved a minor subdivision request and recommended approval of the rezoning request, with conditions, by a vote of 4-3. 1:45 P.M. 3. TOV 15 Year Employee Recognition Presentation: Dick Duran * Mark Benson, Fire Captain. 1:55 P.M. 4. Discussion Re: Council Meeting Format. Tom Moorhead 2:10 P.M. 5. Discussion Re: Community Development Department Long Range Peggy Osterfoss Planning Priority for 1994; Update of Land Use Plan or Master Plan Kristan Pritz for the Vail Commons Site and Adjacent Areas. 2:40 P.M. 6. Discussion Re: Vail Valley Marketing Board (VVMB) Fair Share Tom Britz Funding. Jan Strauch Action Reauested of Council: Consider this proposal and approve/disapprove '94 funding request. Background Rationale: At the VVMB regular meeting Thursday, December 2, 1993, a recommendation was passed by the VVMB to present the following options to Council for consideration: a) All parties agree the joint effort should continue another 3 years at the minimum. b) Proposed funding for 1994 would be as follows: Beaver Creek $100,000 Vail 510,000 Avon 90,000 VA 50,000 plus other additional smaller contributions. 1 e c) Between now and July 1, 1994, a "fair-share" formula including escalator clauses/CPR growth/etc., be agreed upon to be implemented for 1995. d) Board membership will reflect percentage of contribution, i.e., BC 1 seat, TOV 4 seats, Avon 1 seat, VA 1 seat. This arrangement will continue until July 1, 1995, or until final contribution agreement has been reached. e) Board continues to act as a separate entity, with board members appointed by contributing agencies. f) Neither tour company may have a designated seat on the board; however, a tour company employee could be appointed as a contributing entity representative. For ads currently being placed, to reflect BC's new contribution, one-seventh of ads will specifically carry the BC name. Further, the Board will consider at their next meeting changing the name of the board to be more reflective and inclusive of all participants. Staff Recommendation: A reminder from Steve Thompson: The VVMB has already expended $11,000 of its '94 funding for a special mailing, meaning the general fund contribution would stand at $149,000 reduced from the original $160,000 approved. 3:25 P.M. 7. Police Department Expansion Project Update. Ken Hughey Frank Freyer Backpround Rationale: Town staff and our Owner's Representative will update Council on the status of the Police Department Expansion Project as it relates to schedule, budget, change orders, etc. 3:35 P.M. 8. 3rd Quarter Financial Report. Steve Thompson Action Requested of Council: Review Supplemental Appropriations. Backpround Rationale: Staff presents a quarterly financial report to Council to bring Council up-to-date on TOV's financial condition. Staff Recommendation: Approve Supplemental Appropriations at the Evening Meeting. a 3:55 P.M. 9. DRB Report. Jim Curnutte 4:05 P.M. 10. Discussion re: Draft Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1993, an ordinance Shelly Mello ~ repealing and reenacting Section 18.24.065 and 18.26.045, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for exterior alterations or modifications of buildings in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts; and providing details in regard thereto. Action Requested of Council: Discuss this ordinance in preparation for its first reading at the Evening Meeting tonight. Backpround Rationale: Over the past 18 months, the PEC and staff have worked together to clarify and revise the section of the zoning code which addresses exterior alterations for Commercial Core I and II (The Village and Lionshead.) The changes which are proposed include changing the application dates for the bi- annual submittal, as well as including exterior dining decks and roof line modifications in the exterior alteration process. The 2 e'tl remaining changes serve to further detail the application materials and the review criteria. Please see the memo to PEC dated January 25, 1993, and revised February 8, 1993, and the corresponding meeting minutes. The PEC voted Cr0 to approve these changes at their meeting on February 8, 1993. 4:35 P.M. 11. Information Update. li. Council Reports. 12. Other. 13. Executive Session: Legal Matters. 14. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING h1NEETING START TIwflES BELOW: ~ ~ THE NE3CT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TOES®AV, 92/4/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.flfl. IN TOV COUNCIL CHA~ABERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TOES®AY, X2/21/93, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.I1N. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAflNBERS. THE FOLLOWING !TAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING ii~EETING WILL BE ON TUES®AV, 12/21/93, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAHABERS. ~ ~ ~ ~ C:~AGENDA.WSE 3 s' l~E~~®IRA~~ui~ TO: .Town Council FROM: Community Development DATE: December 7, 1993 SUBJECT: Summary of Planning and Environmental Commission action on Payne Rezoning and Minor Subdivision requests. _ On November 22, 1993, the Vail Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC:; approved the Payne Minor Subdivision request and recommended approval of the associated request to rezone the existing Primary/Secondary zoned lot to Primary/Secondary and Single Family. The PEC included the following conditions to their approval of the resubdivision request: - 1. That the a~prova! of the minor subdivision shall be conditioned upon Town Council approval of the zone change request. - ' 2. That the resubdivision plat not be signed by the Town and recorded with the Eagle Councy Clerk and Recorder until such time that the existing residence on the lot is demolished. • 3. That all aspects of development on each lot, inc{uding at-grads patios and terraces Wiz; , be con(ained within platted building envelopes. 4. a,~~ epaas Ea.r; Ehzll "a-e~ac ate-east .°L' ess+~r i7 ' .That the open space and wetlands easement may stay as shown on the plat. However, no site disturbance or tree removal may occur in the area between the Lot 9 -A eastern building envelope line and the • - western line of the open spage and wetlands area. 5. That the cluster of large evergreen trees located in front of the existing residence not be removed or damaged as a result of construction on either of • the newly created lots.- 6. That the applicant's surveyor shall provide staff with a topographic surrey verifying that each of the proposed lots meet the minimum buildable lot area requirements in the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family Residential zone districts. ~ . Attached please find a copy of the staff memorandum and a draft copy of the November 22, 1993, PEC meeting minutes. 1 • 'I ;1 PUtEMORAf~DUM •TO: Planning and Environmental Commission FROM: Community Development Department DATE: November 22, 1993 SUBJECT: A request for a rezoning of Lot 1,~Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family zone districts and a minor subdivision to create two lots from the existing lot. Applicant: Leo Payne . Planner: Jim Curnutte . v.,..: . k 4.,. ~~\S i:v~~'vv •..v.. nl~.~...... n., .....n.~n.x... n~~..t....~~~.....xv..... ..~»n..}........v n.~..nnv...~..:.~iC.~ti~ii~:i ~::~~:~:~::i s~:stiititii~:::~~i?~~i..v.n........ f. it~TRODUCTtON TO THE REQUEST Leo Payne is requesting a rezoning of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle from the Primary/Secondary Residential+zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family zone districts. Mr. Payne has also requested approval of a minor subdivision for the purpcse of subdividing his existing lot into fiuo lots. Lot 1 is located north of Beaver Dam Circle and south of an unplatted Agricultural and Open Space zoned - ~ tract of Land owned by Vail Associates. The lot is 37,771 square feet in size. In order to accomplish the proposed rezoning and minor subdivision, Mr. Payne has located the new lot line in such a manner that each ne~v lot meets the minimum lot size requirements in the Primary/Secondary zone district (15,000 square feet of buildable lot area) and the Single Family zone district (12,50C square feet of buildable tot area). The.proposed !ot line also bisects the existing single-family residence located on the property. In order to avoid creating a nonconforming situation with regard to building setback requirements, it is proposed that the existing structure vrill be demolished prior to signing and recording the subdivision plat. Mr. Payne has agreed to this condition as well as agreeing to plat a 10-foot tivide road maintenance easement along the front property tine of the two new Pots, a 30-foot wide drainage easement through Lot 1-B, in the location of an existing drainage way, as well as an approximate 11,860 square foot open space and wetlands easement on the eastern half of Lot 1-A. At the request of the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC), the applicant has indicated building envelopes on each of the proposed lots, and has also agreed to restrict the GRFA allowed on each tot to an amount below that vrhich would be allowed if calculated strictly according to the proposed zone district standards. The proposed GRFA restrictions are described in more detail in the zoning analysis section of this memo. IL t3ACKGROUPd® ANf~ f-fISTORV ~ . - The subdivision plat creating Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing was approved by the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners in 1964. The Beaver Dam/Forest/Rockledge Road 1 neighborhood was part of the original "Town of Vail" when incorporated in 1966, and was zoned "Residential" when the Town established its first comprehensive zoning regulations in 1969. The allowed uses within the Residential zone district included single family dwellings and rivo family dwellings. It was riot until 1977, that the Town amended the zoning regulations to create the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district. it vas at this time that all of the lots along Beaver Dam Road, Beaver Dam Circle, Forest Road and Rockledge Road were zoned Primary/Secondary.. On August 23, 1993, a worksession was held with the PEC for the purpose of discussing the proposed resubdivision of .Lot 1 from one. Primary/Secondary zoned lot to two , . Primary/Secondary zoned. lots. At that meeting, the staff, PEC and adjacent property owners expressed a .number of concerns related to the proposed resubdivision. (See attached ' minutes from August 23, 1993 PEC meeting). Upon receiving the aforementioned input, the applicant requested tabling of the application in order..to provide additional information and further refine the application. Specifically, the applicant was asked to address each of the categories contained in the Environmental impact Report section of the Vail Municipal Code (Section 18.56.040). The applicant vas asked to•concentrate on possible wetlands impacts , on the property as well as impacts on existing vegetation, specifically, the large stand of evergreen trees located on the eastern half of the property. As mentioned previously, the PEC suggested the use of building envelopes on each lot for the purpose of reducing possible impacts associated with the siting of future buildings on the property. In early September, 1993, Mr. Payne contracted vrith Dames & Moore to perform a wetlands analysis of the property. The consultants identified two areas on the property that are classified as wetlands. The wetlands consist of an. area approximately 20 feet x 70 feet in size located at the far eastern end of the property and an area approximately 6 feet x 125 feet in size straddling the existing drainage way that runs through the property. A copy of a portion of the wetlands analysis is enclosed for PEC review. The applicant is proposing to protect the wetland areas by providing the wetland and open space easement and the 20-foot vride drainage easement mentioned i.. the first paragraph of this memo. In addition to the wetlands analysis, the applicant has addressed each of the nine categories contained in the Environmental. Impact Report section of the Vail Municipal Code. These categories relate to the proposed subdivision's impact on hydrologic, atmospheric; geologic, biotic, visual; land use, circulation and transportation, population, and other environmental conditions of the property. This analysis vas completed by the architect for the project, Craig Snowdon. On October 11, 1993, a second worksession was held with the PEC for the purpose of discussing the revised application for subdividing the property (see attached copy of meeting minutes). At that meeting, the PEC reviewed two resubdivision scenarios. The first-scenario involved subdividing the property into two Primary/Secondary zoned lots. The second scenario involved subdividing the property irito one Primary/Secondary zoned lot and one Single Family zoned lot. The PEC suggested that the applicant explore the Primary/Secondary and. Single Family lot option because that scenario would allow the lot line between the two lots to be shifted further to the west, allowing the building envelope on Lot 1- A to also be shifted to the west and out of the dense stand of evergreen trees located along the eastern half of the property. The PEC recognized the public benefit of the applicant's intention to dedicate a drainage easement and a road maintenance easement to the Town and plat a wetlands and open space easement on the eastern half of Lot 1-A: The PEC 2 acknowledged the fact that in the past, several lots have been resubdivided resulting in more GRFA on the lot.than had previously been alloyed prior to resubdivision. No unit increase . . was approved for these lots. However, it should be noted that in only one instance has a resubdivision of a lot in Vail resulted in an increased number of dwelling units on the property per staff's research to date. 119a PREVIQUS MINpR SUBDtVISlOt~ REQUESTS SitUIILAR TO THIS APPLICATtQIV Staff feels that it would be helpful to the PEC to be aware of previous subdivision requests similar to the one currently being discussed, as well _as some information regarding the pofential for additional requests of this type. There have been five comparable proposals submitted to the PEC over the past eight or nine years to the best of staff's knowledge. These include the following: 9. A resubdivision and rezoning of Lot 1, °3tock 1, Bighorn Subdivision 1st Filing (1983): This subdivision approval divided one Duplex lot into i~vo Single Family lots. Although this property was large enough to be divided into two Duplex lots, or four units, the net result was no increase in the total number of units on the site. The original lot, prior to subdivision, allowed u.p to 5,862 square feet of GRFA to be built on it. The PEC approval restricted the GRFA on each of the new single family lots to 3,300 square feet each. There vas an increase in GRFA of 738 square feet.- Although building envelopes were originally proposed on each of the single family lots, the planning staff as well as the PEC recommended that they be deleted. The only other restriction, besides GRFA, applied to this resubdivision involved a plat note requiring a ' shared driveway for both lots. The shared access requirement was subsequently removed from the plat at a later PEG meeting. 2. A resubdivision of ~Pitkin Creek fVteadows (1986): This parcel had a long history in terms of previous attempts to subdivide the property. About the time East Vail was annexed to Vail, applscations were made to subdivide the existing duplex lot into three duplex lots. At the time, minimum lot standards required 17,500 square feet of buildable area per lot. Because of this requirement, only two lots were approved on the parcel, for a total density increase of t~a~o units. Following the reduction of the minimum lot size in the Duplex zone district to 15,000 square feet, a new application was submitted to the PEC in 1987. Approval by the PEC at that time resulted in the creation of a third duplex lot for a density increase of an additional two units on the lot. While the new parcel contains significant amounts of area over 40% slope, it was the finding of the PEC that the lofs were both accessible and buildable, In addition, the newly . created lot was bordered by residential development on one side, with National Forest property on two sides of the parcel and I-70 bordering the property on the other. No restrictions on GRFA were attached to either of the aforementioned lot resubdivisions. ' 3. A resubdivision and rezoning of Lots 14 and 17, ~tOCk 7, Vail Village 1st Filing (referred to as the Tannenbaum Subdivision) (1987): This approval created two Single Family lots and one Primary/Secondary loi from t:vo 3 ..Primary/Secondary zoned parcels. This subdivision resulted in no increase in the total number of units, and a 37 square foot GRFA increase.. Due to the .nature of the GRFA ordinance and the way it functions on a graduated scale, . the creation of 'one Primary/Secondary lot and two Single Family lots vrould have resulted in an increased amount of GRFA far the property. The allowable GRFA on the existing lots was 7,518 square feet. Without restrictions, the new Primary/Secondary and two Single Family lots would have been allowed a total GRFA of 9,100 square feet. After discussions with the PEC, it was agreed to restrict the total amount of GRFA on the combined area of the three lots to 7,755 square feet for a total GRFA increase prior to' resubdivision of 37 square, .feet. 4. Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing (1988): This application appears to be the most similar to that bring requested by Mr. Payne and involved a similar resubdivision request (the property is located two lots to the west of she Payne parcel). Specifically, the applicant proposed to resubdivide the existing 30,030 square foot lot into 15,020 square foot and 15,010 square foot Primary/Secondary zoned lots. Both of the proposed lots complied vrith the lot frontage and site dimension requirements of the Primary/Secondary zone . district. The original tot was considered to be legally non-conforming with regard to density because four units were in existence at the time it vas zoned Primary/Secondary. Maximum GRFA allowed on the lot prior- to the proposed .subdivision eras 5,251 square feet. Although the property stood to gain approximately 2,150 square. feet of additional GRFA as a result of subdivision approval, the property owner agreed to restrict the GRFA on each lot to 2,667 square feet, with an additional 500 square feet allovred if an optional caretaker unit was constructed. Therefore the maximum amount of GRFA proposed on . the combined area of the two new lots was 6,334 square feet, for a total . increase in GRFA on the ~rooertv of 1.083 square feet if tvo caretaker units, were built. No increase in density was eroposed, because of the nonconforming situation, however two of the units associated with the resubdivision request were required to be restricted to employee housing. This application was - denied by the PEC. 5. Lot 5, 31ock 2, Bighorn Subdivision 1st Addition (5992}: The PEC's approval. involved the resubdivision of an existing Duplex lot into two Duplex lots.. The approval contained a condition that the density on each of the new lots was restricted to one single family dwelling, therefore, there was no increase in the total number of units, The GRFA was also restricted to 8,804 square feet for both properties, which was 3,745 square feet below the GRFA that would have been allowed without the plat restriction. The original GRFA for the lot was 7,950 square feet so there vas an increase of 854 square feet, of GRFA. ~ - • Please note that these GRFA numbers in the above projects do not include credits which equaled 275 square feet per unit excluding garages. . 4 u. The staff memorandum prepared for the above-mentioned request for resubdivision of Lot 4, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing included some research with regard to lot sizes within the neighborhood of the proposal. The memo states: "we have researched !ot sizes in Block 7 of Vail Village 1st Filing and Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Vail Village 3rd Filing, encompassing what is commonly known as the Village side of the Forest Road area. The results of this research found that the average lot size in this neighborhood is 22,723 square feet, with, a mean !ot size of 24,025 square feet. In addition, there are a total of five lots. in the neighborhood greater than 30,000 square feet "(including Mr. Payne's parcel). "These lots range in size from 30,945 square feet to 37,769 square feet. All of these lots are zoned Primary/Secondary. By way of comparison, fourteen of the forty-two Primary/Secondary zoned lots in Vail Potato Patch are over . 30,000 square feet and nine of the fifty-iv,ro Primary/Secondary zoned lofs in the Glen Lyon Subdivision exceed 30,000 square feet.. Because of the various factors involved n determining the "buildable area" of a site, staff is unable to specify exactly how many of these lots could meet the buildable standard for a potential future ' resubdivision." - fV. ZONIPIG ,4tJALYSlS • Listed below is the zoning analysis which provides a comparison between the development statistics of the existing Primary/Secondary zoned lot and the proposed Primary/Secondary zoned Lot (1-A) and the Single Family zoned Lot (1-B). Existing Lot Prooosed Lois t`~et Increasa Lot Size: 37,771 square feet Lot 1-A: 24,771 square feet -0- Lot 1 •B: 13.000 square feet Total: 37,771 square test Density: 2 units Lot 1-A; 2 units Y unit ' Lot 1-B: 1 unit Total: 3 units a GRFA: 6,489 square feet° Lot 1-A: 4,014 square feet 425 square feet . Lot 1-B: 2.900 square feet Totat: ~ 6,914 square teet'° Site Coverage: 7,554 square test Lot 1-A: 4,954 square feet -0- Lot 1 •B: 2.600 souare feet . Total: 7,554 square feet Garage Credt: 1,200 square feet Lot 1-A: 1,200 square feet 600 square feet Lot 1-B: 600 square feet Total: 1,800 square feet Setbacks: Front: 20 feet Front: ~ 20 feet .0_ Side: 15 feet Side: •15 feet -0- Rear: 15 feet - Rear: 15 feet -0- Building keight: 33 feet 33 [eet ..p_ Landscaping: 60% or 22,663 square feet Lot 1-A: 14,863 square feet -0- lot 1-B: 7.800 souare feet Total: 22,663 square feet 5 ' ' This figure includes two 425 square foot credts. This figure was arrived at through the applicant's decision to restrict the GRFA on the property to that which is currently allowable, plus a 425 square foot credit for the new d~relling unit. Without the GRFA restriction, and calculated strictly according to the proposed zoning on each lot, the GRFA ~lowance (including 425 square foot crests) would be: ' Lot 1,-A: 5,577 square feet ' Lot 1-B: 3,600 souare feet Total: 9,177 square feet Proposed: 6,914 square feet Difference: 2,263 square feet The above listed GRFA restriction on the combined area of the proposed lots (6,914 square feet) does not prohibit the applicant's right to epply for'250 aiidiions' according to the provisions of Chapter 18.71 of the Vail Municipal Coda. V. EVALUATION OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST A. Suitability of the proDOSed zoning. The Community Development staff feels that the existing zoning in this area of the community is appropriate and does meet the development objectives of the Town of Vail. The Vail Land Use Plan, adopted in November of 1986, identifies this lieighborhoocJ as appropriate for Low Density Residential development. Lot 1, at _ 37,771 square feet in size is the largest lot in Vail Village.3rd Filing, and has more than twice the minimum buildable lot area necessary in the Primary/Secondary zone district. Although the applicant had previously considered subdividing the lot into two Primary/Secondary zoned lots, which vrould not require a zone change application, he has since proposed to rezone.a portion of the let to Single Family. This redevelopment scenario eras discussed with the PEC, at their October 11, 1993 worksession, in an effort to move the proposed newly created common lot line between Lots 1-A and 1-B further to the west. By moving the common lot line west, the building envelope on Lot 1-A would also be moved to the west, thereby saving all of the existing trees in the heavily forested area on the eastern portion of Lot 1-A. There are Single Family zoned lots in the immediate neighborhood. In 1986, Lots 14 an 17, Block 7, Vail Village 1st Filing were resubdivided and rezoned in a manner • which created one Primary/Secondary zoned lot and two Single Family zoned Pots. !t ' was the determination of the staff, PEC and Town Council at the time that Single Family zoning in this neighborhood was appropriate. Staff believes that the proposed rezoning of the Payne parcel to one Primary/Secondary zoned lot and one Single Family zoned lot is suitable. B. Is the Amendment Preventing a Convenient. Workable Relationship with Land Uses Consistent With Municipal Objectives? • The proposed rezoning and resubdivision would not effectively change the concept of low density residential development in this area of the community. Although the proposed rezoning and subdivision will result in an additional structure on the lot, staff believes that due to the location of the heavily wooded stand of trees to the east of the existing building and the existing drainage way to the west, the applicant may be able to make a good case fora "separation of units" under the existing Primary/Secondary zoning. Additionally, since the total square footage of development on this property 6 I• does not change substantially, staff feats that` the proposed redevelopment will not prevent a convenient, workable relationship with land uses consistent with municipal objectives. . C. Does the Re,zonina Provide for the rro~vfh of an Orderly. Viable Community? : The Community Development Department feels that since the proposed rezoning meets the development standards for the proposed zone districts to be created on the lot, as well as complying with the intent and purpose section of the subdivision regulations, the proposal does provide for'the growth of an orderly viable community and creates no negative impacts or undesirable precedent for the community. D. Does the rezonina comr~(v with the Vail Land Use Plan? The Vail Land Use Plan designates this area as suitable for Low Density Residential uses. Single family, primary/secondary and duplex construction are all considered acceptable building types within the definition of Low Density Residential. Other Municipal Objectives can be found in the Vail Land Use Plan. Staff has listed the. relevant goals and objectives from the plan below: 1_1 Vail should continue to grow in a controlled environment, maintaining a balance between residential, commercial and recreational uses to serve both the visitor and the permanent resident. 1_2 The quality of the environment including air, water and other natural resources ~ should be protected. as the Town grows. 5_1 Additional residential growth should continue to occur primarily in existing, platted areas and as appropriate in new areas where high hazards do not exist. _ Staff believes that the requested rezoning is consistent with the above stated goals and objectives of the Vail Land Use Plan. . Vt. MINOR SUB©tVIStON CRiTERfr1 One of the basic premises of subdivision regulations is that minimum standards for a new lot must be met. These standards typically deal with minimum lot size, lot configuration, etc. As a result, these standards establish the first set of review criteria to be considered with this application: ~ . A. ~ lot Area ~ ~ ` The Vail Municipal Code requires that the minimum lot ar site area for a property located within the Primary/Secondary zone district be 15,000 square feet of buildable area. The minimum lot or site area for property located in the Single Family zone district is 12,500 square feet of buildable area. The Municipal Code defines "buildable area" as any site, lot, parcel, or any portion thereof, which does not contain designated floodplain, red hazard avalanche 7_ I . area, or areas in excess of 40°!° slope. Both of the proposed forts meet the minimum tot size requirement and will be verified by the applicant s surveyor before the minor subdivision plat is signed. # I B. Frontace i The Vail M!~nicipal Code requires that an}~ lot, in both the Primary/Secondary zone district and the Single Family zone district, have a minimum frontage of 30 feet. both of the proposed lots are able to meet the minimum lot frontage requirement of 30 feet: - i - C. Site Dimensions The Vail Municipal Code requires that each site be of a size and shape capable of enclosing a square area, 80 feet on each side, within its boundaries. The applicant's proposed resubdivision will create Pots of a size and shape which meet the 80 square foot area regulation. The second set of criteria to be considered with a minor subdivision request are outlined in Section 17.16.110 of the Vail Subdivision Regulations and are as follows: j "The burden of proof shall rest with the applicant to shew that the application is in compliance with the intent and purposes of this chapter, the zoning ordinance, and other pertinent, regulations that the PEC deems applicafle. Due consideration shall be given to the recommendations by public agencies, utility companies and other agencies consulted under Section 17.16.090. The PEC shall review the application and consider its appropriateness in regard to Town policies relating to subdivision control, densities proposed, regulations, ordinances and resolutions and other applicable documents, effects on the aesthetics of the Town, environmental integrity and compatibility with surrounding uses." ~ I _ Some of the key aspects of the above statement refer to "compliance vrith the intent and purposes of this chapter..., environmental integrity and compatibility with surrounding land uses," etc. As mentioned in the introduction portion of this memo, the applicant has been asked .to address each of the nine categories contained in the Environmental Impact Report section of the Vail Municipal Code. These categories relate to the proposed subdivision's impact on hydrologic, atmospheric, geologic, biotic, visual, land use, circulation !and fransportation; population, and other .environmental conditions of the property. The applicant's ,response to these Environmental. Impact Report categories will be reviewed for~conformity with the seven purpose statements outlined in Section 17.04.010 (Purpose Section) Hof the Vail Subdivision Regulations. The purpose section is intended to insure that a subdivision is promoting the health, safety and welfare of the community. The subdivision purpose statements are as follows: j 1.. To inform each subdivider of the standards and criteria by which development and proposals will be evaluated and to provide information as to the type and extent of improvements required. - ~ 8 ! I . I - Staff Response: One of the underlying purposes of subdivision regulations, as well as any development controls, is to establish basic ground rules with which the staff, the PEC, applicants, and the community know will be followed in the public revievr process. During the two previous worksessions, the staff, PEC and public made the applicant aware of their concerns regarding this request including preservation of the heavily forested area on the eastern half of Lot 1-A, preservation of the two wetland areas, establishment of building envelopes and GRFA restrictions to limit impacts of future structures on the site, etc. Staff believes that the applicant has adequately responded to the concerns raised at previous meetings. 2. T o provide for the subdivision of property in the future without conflict with development on adjacent land. Staff Response: While Lot 1 was originally platted in 1964, prior to incorporation into the Town of Vail, Town zoning has guided development in this area for the past twenty years. The proposal's compliance with the zoning development standards implies consistency with the Town's overall development objectives. The proposed building envelope locations create buffers which will limit impacts on adjacent property's views and privacy, as well as sufficiently limit negative impacts to the environment. 3. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the municipality and the value of buildings and improvements on the land. Staff Response: The value of a lot, and to a greater extent the value of a neighborhood, is in large part dependent on the level and type of development within it. Staff believes that this proposal's compliance with the zoning development standards as well as the voluntary restrictions on GRFA and building location demonstrate that this proposal will not be detrimental to the value of Land throughout the Town, nor in the immediate neighborhood. 4. To insure that subdivision of property is in compliance with the Town's zoning . ordinance, to achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. , Staff Response: Both of ttte proposed lots comply with the Town's zoning ordinance and are additionally restricted in such a manner (building envelopes, GRFA restrictions, etc.) that subsequent development will achieve a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, consistent with municipal development objectives. 9 I 5. To guide public and private policy and action in order to provide adequate and efficient Transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational and other public, requirements and facilities and generally to provide that public facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. ~ ~ i Staff Response: This purpose of the subdivision regulations is intended primarily to address large scale subdivisioris as opposed to this particular proposal under consideration: We do not believe that the additional unit will create negative traffic impacts. It is also positive that the applicant is willing to create the proposed road maintenance and drainage easements. ~ 6. To provide for accurate legal descriptions of nativly subdivided land andlto establish reasonable and desirable construction design standards and procedures. ' Staff Response: I This is an inherent goal of the subdivision regulations that has little specific reference to this particular application. e 7. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, and ponds, to assure adequacy of drainage facilities, to safeguard the.water table and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the municipality in order to preser.~e the' integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of the land. ~ Staff Response: i i Initially, staff was concerned with the impacts of the proposed resubdivision on the mature stand of evergreen trees on the eastern half of the existing lot, as well as y possible impacts to any designated wetland areas on the lot. Dames and Moore identified two areas on the property that are classified as wetlands. These areas consist of an area approximately 20 feet by 70.feet in size located at The far eastern end of the property and an area approximately 6 feet by 125 feet in size straddling the existing drainage way that runs through the property. The applicant is proposing to protect the wetland areas by providing the 30-foot wide drainage easement, and the wetlands and open space easement, mentioned in the first paragraph ofd this memo. The wetlands and open space easement is being proposed not only as a means of protecting the wetlands on the property but also the existing stand of trues located on the eastern half of Lot 1-A. With regard to development on this lot, the applicant has agreed to p(ac~ building envelopes in such a manner that virtually no trees would be removed as a result of . future building construction. There are two evergreen trees (one 5-inch land one 18- inch caliper) located within the Lot 1-6 building envelope which will be removed. The Lot i-A building envelope contains seven trees (a cluster of three 5-inch caliper aspen frees located behind the existing building and a cluster of four 6-inch caliper aspen trees located in front of the existing building) which will be removed. Thiere is a cluster 10 i i i 't of large evergreen trees in front of the existing residence that are located outside of the proposed building envelopes. Staff believes that it is very important to preserve these trees and have included a condition to this effect in the staff recommendation section of this memo. The applicant has agreed to restrict aft building encroachments beyond the building envelope lines with the exception of an allovrance for at-grade patios and terraces along the rear lot lines and building overhangs. With the exception of the applicant's proposed building envelope encroachments, staff believes that the above described development limitations on the property, as tivell as those mentioned previously in this memo, adequately mitigate the concerns previously raised with regard to developing the property in an environmentally sensitive nature. VIQo STAFF RECO~lti'1~Efi1DAT1O119 Staff.recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and resubdivision of Lot i, 81ock 4, Vaii Village 3rd Filing, from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district and the Single Family Residential zone district. Staff believes that the criteria are fulfilled as discussed above and that the platting of the proposed building envelopes, and other easements, has caused this property to be restricted in a manner which is both sensitive to the environment and limits the effect on the surrounding neighborhood. As proposed, development occurr:'ng on the newly created lots would appear to be more restrictive in terms of environmental impacts to the property than what could currently take place under the existing development rights on the property. In other vrords, the applicant could propose to turn the existing residence into the secondary unit allowed on the let and build an entirely new primary residence with the 3,000 to 4,000 square feet of GRFA remaining on the lot. Of course, this new dvrelling unit would be required to obtain the review and approval of the Design Review Board (DRB). Staff recommends that the following conditions be attached tc the recommendation of . approval of this rezoning and resubdivision request: 1. That the resubdivision plat not be signed by the Town and recorded until such time that the existing residence on the !ot is demolished. 2. That a!I aspects of development on each lot, including at-grade patios and terraces and building roof overhangs, be contained within platted building envelopes. 3. The wetland and open space easement shall be expanded to abut the eastern building envelope line of Lot i-A. No construction or site disturbance shall occur in this easement area. 4. The cluster of large evergreen trees located in front of the existing residence shall. not be removed or damaged as a result of construction on either of the newly created tots. 11 i 5. The applicant's surveyor shall provide staff with a topographic s~ rvey verifying that each of the proposed lots meet the minimum buildable lot area requirements in the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family Residential zone districts.. - I 6. Approval of the minor subdivision shall be conditioned upon Town Council - approval of the zone change request. c:lpeclmemos~payne11.22 I I I I I . i i i I I i I I I I ~I I i i I I I i 12 i i I i I I:I1~1AL T'LAT, A RESUBDIVISION OI' LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAIL VILLAGE THIRD PILING TONN Or VAIL, I;ACLI; COUNTY;'COLORADO ERpp1pY n -KdlF~t'ri2194..~ • r l~.~" : ' . o . ~'a. r , , ~ - ^:hnw - nndt4q s dn4tw r wr•Nq wr;a .e wtow•i. artautr nnnq•q -G, .4rY+.i~Mi i ~ , ~w w».~•.r:.r rt1. iw: ..~rw~l~~•.~r•..«. 1. IYnt6 tlp•cs y«m,y..p pIT( ~ - 1 ' • ( Ir •~t b:'i r•1. M F•,`wM1 1 wctwm tw+ 1 OO••pvl talldp•p •rhre~ 1 . ~M • ? t N • • V «t0 .N«•r• ' «w..w• i«« • «r «....n rr r~.. w rr.1 4 MI« Iw.«• N.r r• rr• Y •rn..r_ _•.r.M «I w «r r •.1 . t•y. s.rr r• •...•.~r, M w «.«rw r. •r«« r «w u.n• ' J-i:i:-i::: ..wr. •.r«r 1 r« w of r _ 1.. ml. «a:• • ` a r.... r ~ \rr.r ps me w..mnw UNPIATTEO ~ 1, I,~ wl ~ ni ~~•a.i. 1:r. w . ~ ww«•1 F •r•tr, rrrrN W W .r. UNPLATTEO ti ~ w ..p i...- 4..r ; v:..... n.°n "w_.+ r ar «..,.e•« ~ = •.w.. .r r. w r•4. r. ~ :n • w. « t«rr«,rrrM 1~ ~/^N Nf::iK J~ •Cw•7 ~ N ~ r'•'~ ""nrr ~ 19.1\ ` ..r .r w .n.. ~.7 tDT t8 ".?.°-.ter. raj: _ S I~a9'Oa')S . 1 , w... as ~ .b ~ . / • i'.r ~ ` }0' R.O. ~ lra~.7a _ _ 4, ` Tr27.\O QngwgDtW/NI/ • / Ir/~•xsvt RCLE tc-/s.ao \~p.......,•.~. p,..•.•, rl.t...~ r ~ i « a-sooo CI ca_H aerurtlf a ttv o.n.,`•p «t . ti • n. •Mw ....4? •1..110 1' _ Uraa.a0 / y J' . , ~ Ca-S JtY1P7! tY _ ` G. r w« ut~w .p lOT T R. u . r r. r ~ n ~ M r w •rr• rrr raw. r.• 4 n 1I L?Yp. t.w.. •~_~A•-~.• aw 'It r .r •t r M« •~r ~ ..T.:' ':CHI: 1~ .-NI' tir• M it ttAarvaur ~Imciulc. a/a• .~.....p , - _ ~ l'R~LItv1lNARY . nov te. o i ~ i 'W. ° ~ t y' ~ r h} ' ~R~ ~'s~~'a„~ z `'tire' ~ ~ t _ y ' ~ 1 51~ t t '''+e ec ~ ~ , the t~1~w""~+ ~d °~.;j \ , 1 ~ , v._ s ~ t4 p~ gF71h'~j,~ ~,25bY~D~ ~~o Coh , c~ ~ ~ o ` ~ t° 2t -taS~ ~ ~ I~ ~ 1 • ~ ~tt~d ~ on~d vt {5~~ ~ ~.'~t5~1 ~ i~ IoJM1 o ~J,oi~ 5• ~ areal - 1i ~ ~ hew ~°~'I h ~1~c~ f ~ _ _ ~ ~ - - _ 1 _ _ ~e~~ ' ' ~kd_ ~ - - _ 1 ~ , b ~ - ~ ~~y- } . • ~ p PLANf~lINC AND ENVIRONMENTAL COfl~R1I(SSION .August 23, 1993 PRESENT ABSENT STAFF Kathy Langenvralter Kristan Pritz Greg Amsden Mike Mollica Diana Donovan Andy Knudtsen Jeff Bowen Shelly Mello Dalton Williams ~ Jim Curnutte Allison Lassoe Bill Anderson . 1. A request for a vrorksession to discuss a proposed minor subdivision of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filingl381 Seaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte Jim Curnutte made a presen#ation per the staff memorandum. He stated that the applicant eras requesting to subdivide the existing primarylsecondary zoned lot into i`,~ro primarylsecondary zoned tots. He said that durir:g the life visit, tl-~e PEC had several concerns about this site ar~d that a vrorksession. would be held prior to further development of the site so that ihe~PEC's concerns could be addressed. Concerning the vretlands, Jim stated chat the site plan provided to staif did not si:o~;~ that vretlands vrere present on. this site. The ~vef(ands issue needed to be documented. Craig Snowdon, the applicant's architect, inquired whether the approval could lapse befi~reen the signing of the plats and the demolition of the existing building on the site. Kristan Pritz stafed that the minor subdivision section of the code eras vague on this issue so staff would discuss this subject vrith the Toy;rn Attorney and let the applicant knovr. Kathy Langenwalierstated that the PEC could attach a time limit to their approval, if so decided. Concerning the four conditions recommended by staff in the memo, Craig stated that he did not have a problem vrith any of the four conditions. He stated chat the applicant plans on retaining the northern lot for his own private uses. Dalton Williams stated that he vas concerned vrith the vretlands on the south lot and the trees on the north lot. He said that he would like to know exactly where the vretlands are located and hotiv this vrould effect the buildable area and building envelopes of the property. . Planning and Environmental Commission August 23, 9°93 1 i Allison Lassoe stated that she would like to see building envelopes on each lot so that the PEC would be assured of future building locations. Jeff Sowen stated that he was concerned with the wetlands, trees and th'e excessive slope on this site. He stated chat he felt that the wetland issue pertained to what was considered buildable area. Jim Curnutte poinfed out that the definition of buildable area was that; portion of the lot which did not include slopes in excess of 40%, red hazard avalanche or designated flood plain. Kristen Pritz stated that wetlands enforcement vas a federal issue but that the Town attempts to minimize ~vefland impacts whenever possible and to inform applicants of wetlands issues. Greg amsden stated that more sife analysis needs to be done on this site ~viih regard to building envelopes ~~a `.r:,:.J. "s said that he felt that four units on the site might be • excessive. He felt that the additional GRFA that would be allowed by splitting the lot eras not appropriate as it increased the actual square footage buildable by approximately 50%. Kathy Langenwalter stated that an access easement beriveen the rivo sites needs to be studied. I ~?ancy Byers, an adj2cent property owner, stated that she was concerned with the potential.loss of trees on the sife. She added chat she did not want to see this lot turn into "all house". . Craig Snowdon stated that they were trying to save as many trees as possible and that it vas their intent to leave as many trees as possible along the front properly lines to screen the future buildings. ~ Kathy Langernvalter stated that the PEC would like to see this item tGSfed so that the applicant could obtain a wetlands study as well as information concerning building envelopes. Craig Snowden requested that this item be fabled until September 27, 1993 in order to get the additional information that the PEC had requested. Dalton Williams made a motion to table this item until September 27,E 1993 with Jeff Bovren seconding the motion. A 7-0 vote tabled this request until September 27., 1993. 2. A request for a site coverage variance to allow for an additional covered. entry to an existing residence located at 1547-A Springhill Lane/Lot 2, Block 3, Vail Valley 2nd Filing. Applicants: Frank and Marlene Rembert Planner: Andy Knudtsen Planning and E;wlronmental Commission August 23, 1993 2 . ~ I i ~.A.~r1 E S ~O O RE I l25 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO fi0202-2027 (303) 29;-9100 FAX: (303) 299-7901 13 September 1993 . Snowdon and Hop'sins 201 Gore Creek Drive ~ - Suite 201 - Vail, CO. 31657 . ~ - Attn: Rir. Craig Snowdon . Re: 331 Bu~ver Dam Circle Property Wetland Evaluation File: 271-001-050 `fail, Colorado - Dear hTr. Snowdon; . Dames & RSoore conducted a wetlands analysis of the above-referenced property is Vail, Colorado on September 7, 1943, Wetlands were delineated using U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 1987 guidelines, whereby vegetation, soils, and hydrology data were used to identify wetland-conditions. Foliar cover was estimated for prominent species at sites containing various plant con•,munities to locate wetland-upland boundaries. Soils and hydrology data were also obtained at each site, and consisted of texture, miner:.I, organic, color (l~iunsell color chart), presence of mottles or gleyed conditions, and presence of water on the surface or in the top 12 inches of uhe soil profile. Results Two ~.reas tl;at are considered waters or wetlands of ti-ie United States were identified on the property. - Such areas require a permit under Section 4-0T of the CIe ~z ~'awr Act which is administered by the Corps prior ta- "dredge and fill" activities. A wetland area approximately 0.03 acres (20 x 70 feet) occurs near the easten edge of toe property, and is chzracterized by blue spruce (Picea p:uigens) with an understory of willoai (Salix bracfrycarpa) a_nd horsetail (Equiselwri Jr~me;~lis) (See Appendix A, Site 1). Other plant species of il'te site that are obligate to wetland conditions include cow Bain (Oxypolis fen~len) and grass- of-parrassus (Parnassia firnbriata). Soils of tl`~is site were black (7.5 YR 2.5/0) silts and were saturated. 1~'o springs or definite seeps oz surface water, however, were observed in this area. -A small stream bisects the property, draining upslope development to Gore Crer1, which occurs north of the subjece property. The stream vzries from 18 to 24 inches in width z-td is i.*~cised in most areas to one foot below the soil surface. Wetland vegetation is. confined in most azeas to the banks except in ' several places where the stream gradient flattens and moist conditions extend for 12 to I5 feet. Vegetation along the creek is dominated by bog birch (Betula glandulosa), willow (S. braclycarpa), horsetail, and thimbleberry (Rubus panfiflorus), which are either obligate or facultative to wetland conditions. Other common species along the stream edge include honeysuckle (Lonicer a spp.), shrubby cinquefoil (Potentilla fruticosa), cow Bain and green bog orchid (Habeisaria saccata). Other areas of the site support blue spruce forest with an understory prirn~rity of twinfiower (Liruraea - borealis), Wood's rose (P,osa troodsit), wild strawberry- (Fragaria ~zrginiana), bedstraw (Gfllitu,~s septentrionale), and elk sedge (Carex ge}°en). Openings in the forest ue characterized by a mixture of •a~etlard and upland species including bog birch, willow, wild strawberry, bedstraw, timothy (Phleurrs ' alpinum), and shrubby cinquefoil. - DAMES & i1~O0RE . Snowdon and Hopkins 13 September 1993 Page 2 . The soils of these sites contained~no evidence of saturation, having a dark brown (7.5 YR 4/2) matrix without mottles. Thus, because of the number of upland species and lzck of soil ettzrzcteristics, no other jurisdictionzI wetlands R•ere delineated on the property, i Based on dominzrt vegetation (r,~illows, bog birch, sedges), R~etlands occur oz the Gore Creel; floodplain but this area is north of the property bour•dary, . ; Conclusions ' R.iverine wetlands occur aIo:,g an unnamed creel; that flows across t}o property to Core Cree;;. This stream may be reloczted to make more efficient use of the property. The streani.is iconsidered by 404 regulations to be waters of u`te U.S., a.itd wi11 require a 404 permit prior to construction activities thzt affect wetlands. Approximately 0.02 acres (125 x 6 feet) of wetlands occur in co~njuriction with the stream. According to information provided by the Corps (Grand Tunction •District; Randy! Snyder and Mike Claffey) action that would affect wetlands require either a Nationwide or Individual 404 Permit, depending on the amount of wetlands aif'ected. In this case, since less than one acre ;~~ould be affected, and the stre_rn flow is less thin 5 CFS, an individuzl permit would be appropriate for relocating the stream. ]t4itigztion measures, however would need io be specified to offset relocztion i7pacts. The most effective rutigztion measures are to relocate ~•etlard soils arad associated plant materizI t.o similar environments along the new stream channel. The details of restzblishing wetlands on the site = will new to be provided to the Corps in a letter report requesting clearance through the 444 process. Thus, if the subdivision is zpproved by the Town of Vail, a letter notifying the Corps of the activity, amount of wetland zcreage impacted, and means to mitigate such impzcts will be required, At that time, if mitigztion is still deemed necesszry, Dames & Moore ~•ould be prepared t.o assist you in preparing such a letter for Corps review. PIease con±act me ifyou have questions on this submittal. i Sincerely, D MOORE ~ ; . ~ ° ° R. Hettir ,PhD Senior Ecolo st ~ • p:t~am~s i -i . ~ ~ i 7,~ ~ / f' anlv~ / f O , . / i ~ / % i' ~ .r . ' , / ~ / ' . o f ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ / e ~ ~ ~ o ~7 y- / I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ;_OT 2 ~ ~ ~ aav:rfrnrr / • . / ~ . i i f~-l ~ Pall £E , Nk ~H+YLE . r / r b QJ~ ~ j + ~ f ~ / t,s. 1 1 r~ s~ " .r1 ~ ~ 1'.. ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ti / 1 / ~ r' .t / r " ~ / r / ~ ~ j i ~ r f ~ ~ . tp• ~ ~ "r o~"'-... r. ~ G ~ f ~ a I ' ~ a v~ J p l 1r~ O t ~ },ari5 ~ yt13 . y ~ ~ ~ r 2 i c. i ~i 4 +w` < I/~ yA V ~ '7' ~ ~ ~ I S ~ . 1 1 ~ 11 ~YGa FO ~ " < ,f . / / ' ~t r~,o '_•r'` `fry J ~ ry - f.,.+-~ ~ y e / TIMFER ~ ~ ~r"1 h i~ Gv_ ~Jia ~G~ ,~~~J ~~rf~ /mar J,~ POLE L~ / O=CK / y/ W BL ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i \ 0 ~`s~ / ~ j ~~"~'EOCE 0° FAVFldE~T' / Iti'~ EL. S:a2.3 ~...1 :~.f' PINE '.rt:~~.:_ ~ . I• :•;.+>•.~i.rv~.r~.v.es~if~ae~h~is a...,....._.. ! ..Y ~ r w . w a A ~ ~ ? - r w • ~ p M~~ w .r N d ~ V~ pitta 90.00 4 i _ . . ~ . . ~ • !r • ~ ~ ~ 1 • f ~J•.r ~~~,r?-'~~ ~ jr'`'-'~,•-ter l rte'. " , J'`~~- . ~ ~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~t $ - ~ ~ f ' / e ~ pHVEtfEti'~ 1 ~ E,,Gr 0 ~,I ~ ~ i 61. ~ 8 429' . . ~ ^-c.~ t-7-=~-_ ~ i..• C:1~•~ _ 4. A request for a worksession to discuss a minor subdivision of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing/381 Beaver Dam Circle. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte Jim Curnutte made a presentation per the staff memo. Craig Snowdon stated that he vrould like to have a clarifcation of staff's comment that the proposed road maintenance and drainage easements would be .public. Jim Curnutte explained that Greg Hall of the Town's Public Works Department stated that calling the easements"public" was necessary to alloy the Town to go onto them for maintenance purposes, hovrever they ~^rould riot be open to the public vralking across Mr. Payne's property. Larry Levin, an attorney, stated that he represented several of the adjacent property owners. He stated that both the minor subdivision and the rezoning scenarios would essentially create ha=o additional access points. He stated that he eras concerned that Beaver Dam Road vas not made to handle this type of additional traffic. He pointed out that the hvo nev? building areas that would be created as a result of this request would essentially leave three leveled areas on the site. He stated that he eras concerned about the effects of the drainage easement on Vail Associates' parcel of land adjacent to this site. He stated that the neighbors that he had spoken to vrere not in favor of the increased density and traffic in their neighborhood. He felt that the " impact on existing trees ti=ras significant and does not comply vrith the purpcse statement in the subdivision zoning regulations. Craig Snowdon s#ated that since the last time this item tivas brought before the PEC, the applicant had a ~ti~etlands analysis performed for this property and that a copy of this report was attached to staff's memorandum. He stated that he did not feel that the proposal :vould negatively effect the traffic and density of the neighborhood. ~ He said that special circumstances exist cn thin piece of property that meet the criteria laid out by the Town and affovr fcr its subdivision. Greg Amsden stated that he noticed a pattern among the five previous minor " subdivision requests similar to this application, especially items 1, 3, and 4 in the staff memo. Hs stated that he would like this proposal stay within the ba1(park of the GRFA increases allowed for previous minor subdivision requests (1,500 to 1,700 square feet maximum). He suggested that the applicant seriously took at the single family . rezoning option because it saves the trees within the Lot 1-A building envelope. Diana Donovan agreed with Greg's comments. She stated that she did not totally agree with how this process was handled, but that she could not justify denying this type of request when the criteria have been met. She said that eve should favorably " consider the public benefit cf getting the easements which we currently do not have. Ptanntng and ~ndt;onmentat Commission October 11, S9g3 11 . ~I - Bill Anderson stated that he agreed with Greg's comments and that shifting the lot fine to the west would greatly decrease any impacts to the trees on this site. - • Dalton Williams stated that he was hesitant to go along vrith this request for a minor subdivision because the subdivision was apparently yell thought out when originally platted. He said that both lots ought to be zoned Single Family and that the density should not increase and that the total GRFA should not be increased. Allison Lassoe stated That she agreed wifh Dalton's comments, with the exception that some additional GRFA•should be aNovred on the lots. j Jeff Bowen stated that he feels that the center lot line should be shifted to the west in _ order to save the trees. Ne said that he is not totally persuaded by.the vretlands study. _ _ He said that he has concerns that the 12,500 square fool wrest lot is not of adequate - size. He stated that he was in favor of tyro single family homes. on tt'ii3 site. Kathy Langenvralter stated that she agreed with Diana's comments. S ~ e added that she would like to see a singly family home on the ;vest side of the property and a single family home ;with a restricted secondary unit on the eastern lot. She felt that the . proposed GRFA allowance on both loss should be decreased. _ Larry Levin stated that he did not feel that there was a public benefit having the wetland area designated as such because the property owner would need a 404 Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to build in that area anyway. ! - Craig Snovrdon handed out a site plan to staff and the PEC members tfjat shoved the • ~ center property line shifted 20 feet the wrest. Craig asked the PEC whether they vrould like to see the drainage easement running parallel to the property line. • I Kathy Langenvralter stated that she felt that this ;vas a technical issue ;which the applicant could vrork wifh staff on: , - Greg Amsden inquired vrhether there ~vou(d be two driveway cuts in conjunction with this request. • Craig said yes the property vrould be limited to rivo driveway cuts, which is what the lot could have now. • i Diana Donovan stated that she would like to see a map at the next meefing which depicts the sizes of ail of the lots in the neighborhood. She said that she would also = like to see the documents ;which Larry Levin had made reference to, regarding the history of the platting of this subdivision. ~ ~ • ~ • • Planning and Environmental Commission October 11, 1993 j • , 12 i I • I j ~,f~ , ~ • i ~ ~ ~ . . 0 ~ t~Z~ rGti ~ r . + lti 2 .rt;tat^~ ~ . ,,~n a ~A ! G• act +y ,...~_1,:'~ . o ~ Q Ut;?U•'C"f~0 :1-r 1~ ~ tl 10 ~ ~ 1(j ~Q ~il. •s-~"~~~~~~ . ~ r ~ _ ~ f ~U7~' . . ! r t ~t,2"~~J ~ ~~~v' GCTI. `r~,~~ y.j. D ~2 r /mil ~ 1 ~ J~j -CGS yzs ~no~ ~ r3~ • o Z'~~psp ~'iJ ~ 2,07 ~1' 2 ~ ? c~ 2.3 + n: Ica r' 1 J ~-1 I--.. ~ ~ ~~~?L~ Ci~1DG.. i;1`j` ~ ? 2it;,51 0 17 2 • ~ 1wo~5? t`rS,~`~`'< <°tv2- ~ ~ ~ti s JJ ? 0~ • 4 3 t~ Gt,t JC ' Y~r~ [I ~ Lc T~' +~-{1.1j ~Ot'~ ~ t • • 2'~ i z~+ o`~ r ~'i ~ . ? 21 r`~lL' h L, ,r}~~~ nc. ~ ~ U'~ ~a t~'~ N 323 .Z.r~ 2t ~1 ~ ~ 2~ i~'~ ? r O ~ _L_._.5~~• 3- 1/~ 7 A D +1Q 4 Y~ G„ ~i ~ ~t.~~ ' 7CUJ 2 1~ ?'27~ T, jc~ ? ~ G ~Lti 5 rtc z 1 r7 ?t~-~ . ice; ,.~~ct ' ~ n. 2'1+0~~ • f - - INTERSTATE 70 . lIM T.C.v.) A S~@RLY t~al~-IAJJ_I ,R"' T-E-i--- _ [~~~K I , VAIL LIONSf~EAD= -F~~N-~ ' A OvEavaS3 ~ ~vAI+/cf ! 2., ( PARKIN) VAIL r • 1YCST- 60a T SIRUtT VRE IN TLRNAiIa+r - • PAa wo ~ar'~ wlr+pL zex iAl. I ING HEAD Ssa Tao 130 +¢urAO G au VAI L410NSHEAO "RI 'I I ~ o?xrrACE us ESlJt3D1Y1S1Q . OEf~FiT C. . VAIL 7 D VAI ~ 41h. DING ~At+o+!ARx urnrovsE " s LIONSHE PoKE , LVIL ASE 2nd ~L Srl I TAST Lqr:,.n. CN214N t ERI-+1+a' iq 333 3 T :+YP A7 Cr QE ICE ARChA 2nd FILING •i Z ro P~' ~ af+fNEAp I`30Mbll SZI 1 ro ItE e L VILLAGE Q Pr 44 • TR.1^Tr ApE c T O = r _ .+orrltts 'w.Rl~sl~ •331 COOL[ AT 4 +1CAp 9th.F.ILING t TRrcrc -;eIR 'GCU+oou •e[ETOVS a upRAR Ia3cr A vsa e s ~ [xlt - • VAIL SPA ~ • 410NiANCROS Cts 100 •S.t t)i l C Q'C BAr K 7q AEG sa• ? 4 Cld;:kCtDS 1 ta( VAR. VtIICY 2 BLD4 0 - C[.+TCR ba XOq p 110.45 Sc`UAR: { c AcE01CA CCNSCR O 12! _1 M RRIOTT NORTN "RC I 1 SKArI 1 l/OU04Y DDt ' P afArJ( 4 037 ( 9 17 272 laUSC ACP/43RN tANDAR twq VtIC IffOG' ~ MLSY 17 , 714 1 TICICT 0 UPLRTTCD ~ T7tACT B e kL3i IFAOON lal 121 E Sj. ,t l0T O b1AR•i. SHOP W[ST -ea•-r Y'F I~ T 1fA • A N CION'S SOVARt l r 232 SO Oat DIY C ANTCCRS • I LODGE ; AI VIL AG = 2n IL'I /0.1OaY _ YAR. vnLAG E4N VI A 10f, tR ~ aco TRr+7 0 7u ut R2 3'4 Iti 2 1 IgVSE ~ A E M 3 ~ ~ at 2 a ARCtDE . FIU G TRACT A 761. xl a4 ~ti ) o' D• , I us rcRtsr Ra:a , VAIL 0 Sk~EL1Df2rr NG NE~aoR• ~ i' " ! ~ r `'i ua,«EAp • VAIL LION TDT nor V 1 ILL G ; u ~ TRrtT a .ala 'r s 3J;~""'m•tir3~rr + SEVER ~ ~ -2'a'J~ F Lil G AI 4p YILIA Irl ~ 1 ro v olarT I SRICR tNIDGE 3 Z4) , ils eANX• TRACT C a4a • TRACT B r Sal 7)3 t67 7l) I I~ 77 ul ta'Tti aa0 O S a~7 3 2 ~}r ~ t47 3 D ` TAACT J 1r a:.vR ~ I/~)~/L/./~~y~r~{pl~\~~~' aP9 ail TTNNS 4 ~ 3 4rt •r3 Y ~ 10 24 27 C7UPEL RR•(q~.yO3r Ra Jaf 7 7 . sl7 [OiFiTS. r ~ e T9 TDA~ 232.E Ir1 I Oa 29 • la T r i aa7 T !r4 ua xa 321 77a 84 ~ RAC 2 n ~T O 6 »4 7 2S ~ 2i 2D E4 1 a) O RO i • f 4 A4 3 , 2 1 le , 2 3 Tf.S 241 165 ~p a7 33 34 4d lDW /Pf ) 4 )t r ,127 129T.ATT[O ~ as4 • na 7 na us a! q 3S ~ t MR.Ly~ct. IS N 13 R 11 b ~ f e Ta 6 S 4 3 2 'aba 1 31~'ot Ira jZ • 1= 9 Y 61aa • S a4, eta , aoo va tas rsa rx TIa roa n ua us sas )bb ess r t TRACT A I 6 ) 4 7 2 710 IK ut +ta ~ h AN au a14 a{ sbt l3 b fA AA 7 a7 - - VA 1/ LLA E G _ L) G ~ I 1 le a nr ur !v ur it ' ~ ~ ?~nanl 1~ c11c~nlvt~InN I VAIL LIONSHEAD ~ ~ OPA ~ o RESU©. ' , P~A(i~fA91N(~ A6V® EPd!!IR®IVMENTA<L C®MI4AISS1®1~ ~`J G 4 I~overnber 22y `1,993 ~ U MI(VUTES MEMBERS PRESEiVT STAFF PRESENT Greg Amsden I<ristan Pritz Bill Anderson Jim Curnutte Jeff Bowen Mike Mollica - Diana Donovan Kathy Langenwalter Allison Lassoe Dalton Williams 1. A request for a minor exterior alteration to allow a bay window expansion of Gotthelf's/196 Gore Creek Drive/Lots A, B, C, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Paul Gottheff Planner: Jim Curnutte Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this request for a minor exterior alteration to allow facade changes at Gotthelf's per the staff memo with Dalton Williams seconding this motion. The PEC felt that the door design as proposed by the applicant was acceptable. A 7-0 vote approved this request. 2. A request fora minor subdivision and a rezoning from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district, to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family zone districts, for a parcel located at 381 Beaver Dam Circle/Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: Leo Payne Planner: Jim Curnutte Jim Curnutte made a brief presentation per the staff memo. He stated that this was the third time that this item had been before the PEC. The first two times were w.orksessions. During those worksessions, the public, staff and PEC made several recommendations to_ improve the applications. Jim stated that staff was recommending approval of the minor subdivision and rezoning requests with the six conditions outlined on Pages 11 and 12 of the staff memorandum. It was decided that since Craig Snowdon, the architect for this project, had not yet arrived, that the PEC. would move on to Items #3 and #4. Upon review and action on items 3 and 4, the PEC returned to reviewing the Payne applications. ~lanntng and Endtronmental Commission Minutes Rlodember 22, 1993 1 Craig Snowdon stated that he was concerned whether the term "open space and wetlands easement" was correct because the plat called this an "operi space and wetlands area". He added that he would like to see conditions 2 and 3 of the staff memo concerning roof overhangs and enlargement of the open space. and wetlands area be deleted from the list of conditions on Pages 11 and 12 of the staff memo. He said that he did not have any problems with the other four conditions outlined in the staff memo. Jim Curnutte stated that since.the area to which Craig was referring.was not being dedicated to tfie public it did not necessarily have to be termed an easement and that calling it an open space and wetlands area was okay. Nancy Byars, an adjacent property owner (352 Beaver Dam Circle), stated that she wondered if it was really necessary to subdivide this lot for the additional net increase of 425 square feet. She added that she was concerned that approval of this resubdivision request could be precedent setting and that it was her understanding that. twenty-eight other lots within the Town could in the future come before the PEC with similar requests., She said that neighboring property owners bought their properties with the assumption that the surrounding lots would remain as originally platted and zoned. She said that she would like to keep the uniqueness of their neighborhood in tact. Ron Robbins, attorney for David Ransberg, stated that he was called at the gym and asked to attend this meeting. so he has not yet had an opportunity to review the request in detail. He said that Mr. Ransberg is against this proposal as it would . increase the density in this neighborhood. He added that this application may well be considered spot zoning. Mary Pownall, an adjacent property owner, she said that she opposes this project because it increases the density in. the neighborhood. She acknowledged that her property was also involved in a resubdivision and rezoning in the neighborhood but pointed out that no increased density resulted. She said that she felt that this. resubdivision and rezoning would be a bad precedent. Craig Snowdon responded that there may be twenty-eight lots that could possibly resubdivide but that,not all of these lots could benefit the Town in the way that this proposal could with regard to wetlands and open space dedications, drainage easements, the road maintenance easement and GRFA and density restrictions. He said that building envelopes are also being proposed because the applicant wanted to maintain as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible. Mary Pownall asked if an applicant just had to list the Town benefits of a proposal to get approval. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes November 22, 1993 ~ 2 Jim Curnutte stated that approval of this request was not based on how many benefits . the proposal would give to the Town. He explained that the staff recommendation of approval of the project was based on whether specific resubdivision and rezoning criteria were met. Jeannie Bailey, inquired why a ten foot road maintenance easement had not been agreed upon at an earlier date. She wondered whether this was a deal that the . applicant and the Town were making in order for this request to be approved. ' Kristan Pritz emphasized that the Town was not approving this request so .that they . could get a drainage easement and a road maintenance easement from the applicant. Kathy Langenwalter stated that the applicant has the right to request a resubdivision on this site due to the size of the property. Jeannie stated that she agreed with Nancy Byers comments concerning this proposal. Ron Robbins stated that it is possible to make a case that since the Town had maintained the road for many years in the past that the road maintenance easement may not be needed. Craig Snowdon stated that this was a somewhat unique situation and that the Town . was merely taking this opportunity to formalize the right to continue to come onto the property to maintain the road. Nancy Byers stated that she was concerned with the applicant's statement that three houses would save more trees than two units. She stated that the two units would still need to be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Greg Amsden asked a question concerning the Zoning Analysis on Page 5 of the staff memo. He wanted to know how to interpret the figures for GRFA. Jim Curnutte stated that the applicant had voluntarily restricted the GRFA and that he was well below what was the allowable GRFA for aPrimary/Secondary and Single Family approach. - - Diana Donovan inquired whether the units would be able to apply fora 250 at some future date. Jim Curnutte stated that there was nothing to prevent the applicant from doing this. Dalton Williams stated that he was not comfortable approving this request and that he agreed with the comments that the neighbors had made. He said that he felt that this could set a negative precedent for the Town. However, he said that he would have a hard time denying this request because the proposal does meet the applicable criteria. He said that he felt that this proposal did offer the Town some benefit and wondered whether there was a way to possibly get more Town benefit out of this request. He ~lannin~.and ~neironmenta(commission AAinutes Piovember 2~, 1993 3 suggested that the applicant agree to allow public access across the property in order - to reach the open space behind the lot. Allison Lassoe stated that she agreed that this could set a negative precedent for the Town but that she felt that the proposed request seemed to be a good solution. She stated that N1r. Payne had made a lot of concessions to address PEC concerns. She stated that she did not have a problem with the open space and wetlands area line as currently proposed, nor allowing building overhangs to go outside of building envelopes. . Dalton Williams agreed with Allison's comment concerning staff conditions 2 and 3. Jeff Bowen stated that he felt that the applicant had met the criteria set forth in the staff memo. He' said that he did not have a problem with the proposed open space - and wetlands area line, or the roof overhang allowance which the applicant was proposing. Greg Amsden stated that he felt that the applicant had' complied with all of the criteria. - He said that if the neighbors were unhappy with this type of request that the rules would need to be changed, but that was not the request before the PEC today. Greg Amsden stated that he was in favor of leaving the roof overhang allowance and open space line as proposed by the applicant as a part of the proposal. Diana Donovan stated that the roof overhang allowance does not bother her. She felt that the plat should include a note that explained what type of uses and structures ' would be allowed in the open space and wetlands area as well as the area between the building envelope and the open space area. No trees should be removed for improvements in the easement area. She said that she did not feel that this area could accommodate the additional density or traffic. She said that she was against the resubdivision of this property but that she did feel that two single family units could be ` placed on this lot. Craig Snowdon stated that when you increase density that you do get additional square footage and garage credits. Bill Anderson stated that he agreed with the other PEC members comments. He said - ~ that this proposal did seem to meet the requirements for resubdividing the lot. He said that he felt caught between a rock and a hard place since he did not want to see ari increase in density in this neighborhood. He said that Diana's suggestion concerning two single family units could possibly be the best solution. Ron Robbins stated that it sounded like the Board members were struggling with approving this request and told them that they did have the ability to deny the request if they did not approve of the resubd'+vision. Planning and Environmental Commission Minutes November 22, 1993 4 r'. Kathy Langenwalter stated that she felt that this request did meet the criteria for a minor subdivision and directed the PEC to refer to the PEC meeting minutes of October 11, 1993. She felt that the proposed secondary unit should be a restricted employee housing unit. Dalton Williams stated that a petition signed by fifty or so citizens submitted to the PEC illustrated that there was concern regarding this proposal. He said that he agreed with ~ Diana's and Kathy's comments. He said that he would like to see the secondary unit restricted as Kathy had suggested. He said that he would like to see public access allowed across the lot. He said that he felt that the Town rules might need to be changed because of the public's concern. Nis. Langmaid, concerned citizen, presented the PEC with more petitions, signed by people all over town, objecting to the application and stated her own objection. Allison Lassoe stated that she agreed with Kathy's comment that the secondary unit should be a restricted caretaker's unit. Jeff Bowen, Greg Amsden and Bill Anderson had no additional comments. Diana Donovan stated that she would support this project if the third unit was a restricted caretaker's unit. Jay Peterson stated that he was involved with developing a duplex in this area and that if this sort of proposal was allowed that he would like to have the same opportunity "~to do this type of development. Jay was concerned about compatibility. Jeff Bowen made a motion to approve this request for a rezoning and resubdivision of ' Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing per the staff memo with a modification to, staff recommendations 2 and 3 to allow building overhangs to go beyond platted building envelope lines and to allow the western line of the open space and wetlands area to remain as shown on the plat. Greg Amsden seconded the motion. Diana Donovan stated that she would vote against this request because the secondary unit on~the primary secondary lot was not proposed to be restricted. ' .Dalton Williams statbd that he agreed with Diana's position. Diana Donovan suggested that the motion be amended to include the wording that no construction site disturbance or tree removal may occur in the area between the Lot 1- Abuilding envelope and the western line of the open space area. Jeff Bowen amended his motion accordingly and Greg Amsden amended his second to the motion. A 4-3 vote approved this request with Kathy Langenwalter, Diana Donovan and Dalton Williams voting against the motion. Planning and i;nvironmental Commission Minutes Plovember a2, 9993 S Adrian & Marlene C. Kearney 1460 Ridge Lane #B vfail, co 81657 DTovember 22, 1993 Planning and Environmental Commission Town of Vail 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 Ladies and Gentlemen: You have before you today a request for a~subdivision of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village Third Filing also known~as 38i Beaver Dam Circle. The purpose of this letter is to inform the Planning Commission that and decision that will allow additional dwelling units in the Town of Vail, or that will increase the square footage allowed under the existing ordinances is totally un- acceptable. We do not believe that altering ordinances and or statutes for the sake of continued development and increasing density in the Town of Vail are in the best interests of our community3 Sincerely, . ~ NOVEMBER 22, 1993 PLANNIIv'G AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAII: VILLAGE TIiTtZD FILING AL3C :.":OV~'N ;:S 381 LEAVER L4'1.'~q LI ~.E. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lei i~R IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WILL ALLOW ADDTTIONAI, DWELLING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAII. OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei i~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO . ARE EITHER FULL OR PART TIME RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS REQUEST. SINCERELY, PRINTED NAME VAIL ADDRE4S SICiNATITRE c i a . ( rya /Y) a. nn -r ~/~t n c ~i ~~GLf/Z.~,/'~~~ ~Lc ~ - ~ a r ~ ~yl'~~ r "t~ ~l S 4!v p~,v.~C.r. 2Q.c~~7 ~i rvm ~h tw,? i~ I.11 ~ (~~.v~~,~ UPI ~ i~~ ~~h D ~ r,~,,,, r n U 11-21-19y3 11 ~ 34AM Ffi0P1 ~ ~ u IJU'.J4 1 OG7JCJ r . c~~ NOVEMI3E~t 22, 1993 PLANNING AND FNVIROiv~'rAL COMMISSION . TOWN OF VAIL 75 S(?U'fH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, CC)LORADO $1657 LADIES A.'~ID GEI,TILEI4;EIV, • YO[J I IAVE gl:i?'URE YOU ~ ~vAY A REQITE,ST FOR A S«DIVISION OF LOT 1, BL C}CK 4, vnrr, vlLi ACiE T1I1Rll PEEING ALSO KNOWN AS 331 BEAVER D,~i~4 CIR(,'I E. THE PURPOSE OF TFIIS L,r.i l~rc 1S TO INFORM THE PLANNING C0~•iMISSZON THAT ANY DECISION THAT V1rII.L ALLOW ADDTIIONAL DWELLING UN'TTS IN THE TOWN.UF VAII.. OR THAT WII.L WGREASE TIC SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UN'Y71rR THE EXISTL~TG ORDINANCES IS UNACC'EFrABLE. THE FOLLC)WINCi.SICJNATUItF•S ON THIS. L~,i i~R nEMONSTRATE THAT A lv'IJMBI~R OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FTJI.L Olt PAEtT TIl~!IE RESII7EIv'TS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RE.SPON171b THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE ANF~ RF.JF..C'T THIS IZEQ[3~ s-r. sm~cEr.E~.Y, PRTti i r.~ VATT, ADDRESS Stl~h'GxTiT~ ~C:~iT D. SKI 3~1~ ~tA~~ ~k~~t ~ /.J, ~~~t ~,~11.1. (C..i C 01~ i `f 1:1 ~t,~c~L ~AN\ P.-~ ':~f,~"~.-C.~~-'~L ~J . ~t/LL. NOVEMBER 22, 1993 PLANNING AND ENVIItONA~NTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL; COLORADO $1657 LADIES AND GENTT,II~IEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAIL VILLAGE THIRD FILING ALSO KNOWN AS 3~1 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lr.l tnR IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WIIL ALLOW ADDITIONAL DWELItING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei i~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FULL OR PART TIlVIE RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS REQUEST. SINCERELY, PRIM i~i~ NAME VAIL ADDRESS SIGNATURE j ? VEIL v r. f~?C zazce - ` d r ~f ~ .I i ~ ~ ~ ~k X11,1 . TQ~IN OF V(~IL CQM-DELI ID ~ 303-473-2x52 f~lOl1 2~' 93 14 ~ 4a Ada .005 F .01 . NUVI MBirk 22, 1993 PLANNLNG AND ENVIIZUNMEIV'!'AL ('O~vID'TISSION TOWN QI~ VAIL ?5 SOUTH FRON7'ACZr ROAD VAIL, CC)1.URAllU 816,57 LADIES AND GEN'17.F.MTN, YOU HAVI; BL•FURL~ YL)LI TODAY A ItEC~Uli5T FOR A SLTIIUIVISION ()F I.OT 1, BI,OC:IC 4, VAIT VILLACi1 r TIiIR)a FTLLNG ALSO KNOWN A5 3A1 BF.AVI~R PAA4 (;[ROLL, '1'HF, PUkI'USE OP'fHIS LE'ITF.R lS '1'U INFOkM TIiL I'I,ANNING COI~4MISSION THAT ANY DECISION '1'liAT WILL ALI:OW ADDITIONAL DWF:I,LING UNITS iN THE'It)WN OP VATi. OR THAT WII_i, nvGltl~:nsc '1~-1F. SQ[JAkF, FOO"1`AGE ALLC}WED UNDER 7'liE EXIS'!'1NCi C?RfltNANCI:S IS [INAC:CI;!?TA~LI;. 'I'HF, I'OLLGWING SICiNATURI;,S QN 1'lilS L.L"I'1~K T)EM4NSTRAI'1. THAT A NUMBL'ti OF FEOI=LE W1iU AR};: EITIi11R FALL Ok PART 1'11:7F,121;SU?1~:NTS C)F THi; TUV1'N OTC VATS. ARI: NOT IN 1~AVOR OF THIS PItC)FOSAI. AND ASIC THAT YUtI RESPC)NI) m !'HE WISIi>~S Ur z'Iix PE(~PI.H AND R)~.1ECT THIS ILE(~ULS'1'. SINCF,RELY, r - P{21N'I'F ~~N~~v F varL Al~n,~~ _ i / NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAII, 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAII., COLORADO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAII. VILLAGE THIRD FII.ING ALSO KNOWN AS 381 BEAVER"DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lei i~tc IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WILL. ALLOW ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS~IIV THE TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei i~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FULL;" OR PART TIME RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAII. ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND RETECT THIS REQUEST. SINCE Y, i PRIlVTED NAME VAIL ADDRE,C.C CTS TiJRE L~~uc e UPV1S ~v1 337, ~Cave/'~d~(_~~.rc~P ~y - ~ ~3s hE~4V~ ~ fi.o~ Cry. uio,~~ (J t' y ~ Ro$~~~ ,~~.N1GaLlit/ /ZL~Og ~'~G3It .C~~~~~ rd l Cam(`-4 ~.v J ~I`!`~? v r' ~ ~o dim , S a N ' I Gl~.^-~ Vl _ r~ ~ a vv NOVEMBER 22, 1993 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMIIVTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, • YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAII. VII.LAGE THIRD FILING ALSO KNOWN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lei i~R IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION -THAT WILL ALLOW ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS L~ i 1~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EI'THFrR FULL OR PART TIIvIE RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAII. ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS ' REQUEST. ' SINCERELY, f PRINTED NAME / r' VAIL ADDRESS I SIC;NAT[JRE ;y~'r~ ~ Pity : c r ~ ` , ~ f~ ~ ~~,s~~~~ ~~5 ~C~~ i U t. ' , t : ..`L e;z f 6 • a. ~ 0 a • ~..p t - _ ~,lldvOi V'IIt®~'Tf~ C®A9MiSSIL~IIP . ~0~ SeJC/ 8Fb i'&!ti/d\ 6Cl~Fd dS~/!'OL~' S`t ' pV?~%I~, COLQrI~O S%6S9 Y - '4-`; ~ ~0'Lp Ft~~lE BEFQdt~ XOLT TOA~,Y.~ REQ[~S~' ~'OTt A 5LTIiDIVIS10rd 0~ LOT g, IILOCIK 4, 'Y~,I1~ VYI.e~,/t4E . a .°x°~II,R~ ~'tLIN® ~.SO.lE4~1QWN ~S 9EA~t I~~rI CTItCI.E. l c . 4 • `~~IB T~I'OSE OFTFIIS ~~e ~EI3 g9 T4 t~QRl« ~'i-t2~ rL~n~NIN~ C4~iMiSSIOi~ 't~'I~'T APIY 1?~CISt4N `A2', `NIr..Y. ~L,1LOW l1~DI1~OIV~I._ DWk~~LINC3 L'%±TI7; S II~3 Tt~IE eTOWI~ ~ VA1x, OR'TI-IAT WILL tI~ICItEASB `~'d IB S~~Jf1•RB ~DOT~OE ~I,LQWED UArDEit T'I~IIE EitIS2'lN'Q OIt~L~IeNGI`sS YS LJI~ACCBPT~I3I.E, `~tTr f'OLp.OWI~G SZL°ii~fl~,`YU'RddS, ®N THIS I.EZ'l2::It DL&IONS:dR~T~ 3'H11T A I~IYJMBrR OL= F)rOrI,.E'W$IO ~,R~ EI'd'k~~ ~UL~, ®~t PICT T1I~fE RY:SYD~IvTMd'S Q~ Tl•Ila'TdV6'N,OF VAfL ~gRfi NQ'I' ~ 1~~.VQtt 4r TI•IIS ~liOriOSI~L ASK'd'FIAT 1'OU RFSI=pN~ T®'TFI~ WdS~JJ~S 0&"I~iL~ PLOI=L$ ~~71k~:T TII19 ~sI~~ST ' ' 4 ~~4~4s~~1~+.%fd 3 q y'' • ~ ' r~"4~ ~PA~ gJ~11`l. A~flP~I"S,4 - --ST!'~Tt 1[2] ~ ~ - - - - _ - - p~.3 e • • et G....-..---_._ __.-_r ~.T_ T _ - . _..'m6...__ _..._6.._ S-: .l a- - _.._L__-..._~..~~.._. _ .f 4 r e . £©'d LL~I~S~© [~~b-dfl Xt?.~t~Nt1d B~:rT £6E~Z~`50~'ZT ,j - i i i _ NOVEMBER 22~ 1993 PLANNING AND ENVIItONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAII. ~ 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD ~ VAIL, COLORADO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK i , VAIL VILLAGE THIRD FILING ALSO KNO«Tt AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lhi_i~tc IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WILI. ALLOW ADDTI'IONAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT jWILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei ~~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FULL OR PART TIlVIE RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS -PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS REQUEST. I SINCERELY, ~ PRINTED NAME VAII. Al1DRE4S l . IC;NA j J f r i j f~ I 1~ 1 1 III i f NOVEMBEf2 22, 1993 Pt.AN?VIl~d~i AMID EN4'IRONA~F~'1'AL COR~9ISSION -r~~wN o~ dA1L 7S soUTH FRONTAGE xoAt~ ~/AiT., COLORADO 8I~57 LAD[NS AND CTFN'TL,IIvIF~1, YOtJ HAUL' BEFORE Y()tJ'I'ODAY A REC1Ut~S'I' FOR A S[JBDIVISIOId OF l.U"1' 1, SLt~CK 4, VATL d11,1,A(;rF. T111RD F(T:ING ALSCT ICP10VdN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRGI,E. THE d'[JRI~USE iDF THTS Ll;a a.a:K I$ TU I1`il'ORA2 '1"}{t? PLAT~TNi1vG CUMhAJSSIQIV '1`Ii,~T A,'VY nF.('.1SIOId THfl'1' WILL ALLOW ADllfT'IONAI, nVW1rLL1NC IJIITI'IS IN THE'1'OWN (:lF dAIL t)li TTIAT WILL lNC1iLASF THE SQLJAT2E l~TACTE ALLOWED ItNIDER 1'HL EX75T1NG ORDINANCES IS fJNAC'C'.L•'PTABLir. 't'HL^' fOLT..UWiNG Si(iNATURFS ON THTS LL1'ITiR DIIViONSTRAI'L THAT A I4't1MBER 6~F PF:t7PLE WH(7 Atti:, EITHER 1~CTl.T. t'D!t PART'111~~ Rl$[DIrNTS QF THE'I'nWN OF VAIL Abt~, NOT TN rAY()K OP THiS l~I20PUSAL Alv'1) ASK THAT YOU RF.S1T(7ND TU '17iE WISfIIrS ~OF `t7IL PEUPI.E AND ItE:JECT THIS k1jQL'ES i . Sit4C:ERET.Y, NTFI") c VAiL,(L~1)ItESS - - S'IC,a f~TTJ _ 7 ~ , r---~ t n n r,.-, r... . _ - C~URCdTUh1 USA TEL :303-176-3111 Nov 21 93 21 :24 hJo .001 P .02 - i j NpVirMI3FIt 22,193 PLANNING ANll ENVIRONMENTAL CnMMTSSION TowN aT~ v~Ir. 75 souTx i~7toNTACl31tc~AD VAIlJ, COLORADO 81657 T.AIaIES AND GENII..F.MEN, ...;..Y:QIJ.,I3AYE BEPb1tL YOLI TOAAY A RL~QUEST FOR A SUBDIYISIpN OF I:OT 1. BLOCK 4, VAIL VILLAGE ~ THiRD FILING ALSO ICI~'C?WN AS 381 BE:4VER DAM CIRCLE. j TMs l'l7ttl'OSE OF THIS LLI'IER iS T(~ INFORM'!'1Li? PLANNING COA~LVIISSIbN '!1!A'I'~ANY I)I:CISION TIiAT WIT.1. AI.LUW ADDITIpNAT. DWELLING UNITS IN'I'}iE TU~'VN OF VAIL bR TIIA7' Wli.i. INCREASE TIiL SQtIARF FOOTAGE ALLOWET3 UIVT)ER TIiL LXIS'I'INCi UTtDINAI\'CES IS CTNACCLtir!'AT3LE. '!'ilL•' I~ULLUWING SIGNA'IU1tES UN THIS 1:,L'1"Tl;l2 ULMbNSTRATA THAT A NUMDL'R UI~ PEUPL$ WHO aKL L'ITHFR FULL OR PAIt'T.TIME RESIDENTS Or'I'HE TOWN OF VAII, ARl1 NO'!' iN i~AVOR OF THIS PTtC}pOSAL ANll ASK THAT YOU K1s.4YOND TO THP., WISHES Olr'1lTE PEU['LIi ANI) RF~JECT T111S RI=.QUEST. SINCERELY, I I PR TNTEll NAM - V qIL AllI~RF.S S S JGN ATLIItE ! ' c=r~kl~ /~l / C~4~=~.~-- 35 ~ ~~C-~}'1~,C~2 1.11 r Jf~z~ L~'~~ ~ 1 - I L/ ~ ~ i • i I i. i i i i { i f I NOVEMBER 22, 1993 PLANNING AND ENVIItONMENTAL COMMISSION . TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLURAUO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAIL VII_LAGE THIRD FILING ALSO KNOWN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lit i~x IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WILL ALLOW ADDTTIOIVAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAII. OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTIIVG ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SI.GNATURES ON THIS Lit t~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FULL OR PART TIME RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS ` REQUEST. . SINCERELY, . ~ P i~i~ NAB VAIL ADDRESS ~~ICiNAT[1RF, ~ ~ ~ may, 12l ~G~~~ i ~ / ~ l'~ lei f 6~~n a .h-<i1 ?d l' /~'t / ~ i ~ ~P it 7 - /J~° n ~,I NOVEMIIL~ ?z,1~93 PI.ANNINO M'D i;xvIRa . 7 Ai, CQM;viISSIpN TowN oI~ vnn ~S sovTlt ~orrrn~~ ~oAD VAt7., COI.ORIII~ 81657 ` LADIES AND GBNTLEI~iL'N, YOU fIAYE BIrPORE YOU TODAY A.R~QCJI;ST FpR A SL~3DIYi510N QF LOT 1, BLOCK VAIt, VILY.hGL TIIIItD FILIN©AI.SC) KNOWN A5 381 I3EAVIrR DAM CIRCLE, ~ TI IE t?U~["OSL QF TFII$ L~ ~ i ~It IS'I`Q INI=pRNI THB IyLANNINC3 CV~IMISSION THAT A.NY DJ3CISION 7N'AT WIJ,L. AI.>;OW ADbff10NAL D~~i.LfNG UNI'T'S ~N THE TOWN.OF PAIL 0R TkiAT WILL IN{:RF.ASI; TI ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOvJED L^~'I?I~R Tl'~Ifi'E?IISTINCI ORDINr1NCES IS UNACL'h[YI'AAJ,F,. TI IE FpLI~OWII`G 5:GNATURE3 ON TXIIS LE'I"FGR D~.~SONSTRA'I'I~.1HAT A NUI~SBER OF P1l"sOriLE wil0 ARE ~1'Tfi1:R FULL OR PART'C'IMI~.RCSIUIr~i1'S pF T}iS.70WiV. OF PAIL AItE tv'Ox IN I~AVOR OR TIidS I~ROi QSA,L 1S,I~'17 ASK'I~IAT YQU RCSIiOND Tp T3~I$ WIS}iT?S OI~ "t}IB PI~OPLB AND I~T7LCT 1'IIIS Ris'QUEST, ~ ~ ~ I SINCERI~.~..Y, i ~R~ ~ _ynn. ~D FSq _ ~ir~reTVRt~ . I . ~ r i i i i ' R ~ ~ ~ II 1 / O I NOVEMBER 22, 1993 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, VAIL VILLAGE THIRD FILING ALSO ICPVOWN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS L~~ i~ic IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION THAT WILL ALLOW ADDTITONAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE.TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDIIVANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei i~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ETfHER FULL OR.PART TIME RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF VAII. ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND RETECT THIS REQUEST. SINCERELY, PRIM i~li NNAME VAIL ADDRESS CTNAT'~JR~__ l S ~ w) ~ A bJ 1 c~ 5 ~ ~~O f l ~ ~ U.~ Ll.. ~ ~ .E1~~7lJt^,. ~ ~ ~ ~ JG 1 ~./l ~~Y!!~2 V~^VU~4~ IZ~ /Yl ~-.772.1!/[ IiV./"~v ~-~K'~// ~LCs~~.a Y / `Y3 ~L~,c~~-~u-.~t~ ~ 9 3.r , ~a~ ~ ~'~~e~1 i'se R 1 ickQ~s~-f.~ i NOVFTtiiBER 22, 1993 i PLANNING ANn ENVIRON'M1?NTAL C0:4iMISSIOIr' 'I'OWI~I OF VAIL 75 SOUTEI I•Rt3N1'AGE ROAD YA3I,, COLORADO 81657 LAYSIES AND GENTI_.F.MIr:N, 1(')Li Hi~VE BEFORE YC)U TODAY r~ REQ(1l.;ST FUR A St3BTJIVISION UI=LOT 1, BLOCK 4, YAI1. VILL;At'iE " , ~ THIRD FILING ALSO KNOWN AS 38I BEAVER DAM CIRC'LI:. THE PU(tPUSF: OF THIS Lct tttt 1S TO W1~URM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY~DECISION THAT WILL AI1~OW ADi]ITIONAI. DWELLING UNITS 1N TIC TOWN OF VAIL OR T1{AT WII.:L INCREASE TIC SQUARE rY~OTACTi: ALLUVVED LINf)ER "cI-IE F,XISTII`TG ORllINAN~::FS iS L]NA(:CT;PTABLL•". THE FOLi..OWING SIGNAT[TRF5 C)N THIS LLt tt;R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NG'MBER OF i'I4PLE WHO ARE ETI'HER FUI,1_ OR.PAJYf TIA"IE IzT:SIDENI'S OP THE TOWN OF VAIL ARR NOT IN I'AVOR OF THIS YROPOSAI. AND ASK TIiAT YOI1 RESI~ONU TU 7"HE WISHHS OP TNI~: PIrOPI.F AND RF.JE:CT THI5 REQUrST, SIIVCERLLY, ,_jRIN'~F.T) NA'1~ V.A1I. ATaT7RirSS ,~iSiNA'I ,1RF. ~ ~ i i ED•HICKS IP9PORTS ID~15128550025 NOV 22'93. 11 15 No .403 P.O1 q NoVF~rI3ER a2, ls~~ PLAAIAJINC AA1U ~v11t~Nm>~:N'I'n}. C~UM~vJT5SIUN TQW>\T ()F VAlT 75 SoU'!'li l~RUId~i'A(i~ R(]AD VAIL, CC)LGitAI~ S16S7 LADICS ANV Gl;ri+lN'I~FT, YOU 1dAV}3 BEh'OR1-; YUU'PUL~Al' A RIQUE,ST I'OR A SUI3I)IVISIUN OF LOT 1, BLfX:K VATi. VTT.T.AGF TI~IRD 17LING ALSO ICTd'OVb'N AS 381 I3EAVL'EL llANI cllaCl.):, . 'THE PURPOSE OF THIS I.l:1 !L' It IS '1'()1NNUItAr( THE: PLAIVNINCi C'UMMISSION 'I'HR'I' t4NX DECISION THAT WILL ALLOW AI7DT170N/?i, nWFt.T,TNG tT!`?ITS IN TIII;'IY)WN C)1~ VAII.. UK 'I'H/~'I' WILL INGREAS>; THE SQi7AItL I~[X)'TAGE /eT.T.(JWFin UNJ~ER 7TiL>;X1STINC; (ikll1NM}c:lsS 1S UN^CCl~.l'7'ABLF,. THE FnLLOWIId'G SIGNA'I'tJKL'S ON TTiTti T.r. ~ i r.R.T)~RQNS'P1tA7'L''1'liA'1' A NUIVIBL'1L ()1' 1'L'UT'I.N WHU ARl1;I'TIIIR %'ULL, OR PART TIME I2FSTAFIV7'S OF THE 'IiQWN 01~ VAIL ARE iv'()T IId FAVC?R QF THTS I'ROT'C)SAI. I~NI) l15I{ 'CHA'T YOU ItT:Sl'OPdI)'1'(3'1'H1r WISHI~,S OF THR IyTsQT'T.P, ANT? T<.~C'I"1'11TS RF~1tiFST. SINC'.EI~LZ , Is~Ai'f'?T) N RA VA}I, AI)17RF1~~-- SIC~NA"1CJKIs ~ED A%CIZS 225 FOREST RD, IfAIL, CO, L 1 i . • • r i NOVENI$ER 22,! 1993 PLANNING AND F,TIVIRONNIF'NTALOOMMISSION TOW:~T OF VA1L 75 SGUTH FRONTAGE ROAD I~ VAIL, COLORADO 81657 i LADIES AND OENTLF~'IEN, YOLT HAVE BEFORi; YOLT TGDAY A REQUEST FOR A SUBDNISION OF LOT I, BLOCK 4!, VAII. VILLAGE . THIR.Ia F°1LING ALSO KNOWN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. ! THE PURPOSE OF~ THIS. LE, ~ ~.R IS TO INFORM THE PI,.ANNLr1G COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION • '1~iAT WILL ALLOW ADDITIONAL DWELLIIvG UNITS IN THE TOWN OF. VAIL OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE, THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lui i~R llEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OE PEOPLE WFiO ARE EITHERFUIZ:, OR FAi2T TIME RESIDENTS OF TN.Ir TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE tYISHES OF THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS I~.QuESr. ~ SINCERELY, PRYNTED I`'Ah'IE VAIL ADDRESS SIGNATUIRE _ .J i I i I 1I • I n I'i I' i i it • • I I I t0'd 0S5$9Lbt ~ Ol d3Sa 'd SI~hdNdd WOcid ~t:£t ~65t-0Z-('i0N I i t NOV 29 ' 93 11 ~ 22Af•1 G~~RSLlCH LIMITED V S V S • 1 u 7 0 NOVER+iBEIt 22,1993 PLAAINH~TG AND r~vVIRONr~vTaL Co~vrlssaol'd T01~b'N OF VASI, 75 SOUTH FIELONTAGE ROAD Vim, COLORADO 51657 LADIES A1VI) GF,I~'IT.Fti2EN, -YOU I~IAiTE BEFORE YOU,TODA°l A REQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BI.QCI~ 4, VAII. VILLAGE THIRD~F7LII~?G AbSO I{NOWN AS ?$I BEA'VIrRDAI?~~IRCLE, THE PURPOSE pF THIS Lei i~R IS Tp INFORN! THE PL.ANA~V°G CO&SMISSION T~IA'T ANY DECISION THAT WILL ALLO~?7 ADDITIONAL, DV~~EI.LIPVCs UAdIZ'S IN THE TOWN OF VAII. OR THAT WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALL,O~D U1~DER Tl~ F..XISTI~IG ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLI.OWLNG SIGNATURES ON 'THIS LETTER DEMONSTRATIr TI{AT A Iv'i1R~BER OF PEOPLE WHO AR.E EITI~R FULL OR PART TIIVIE RESIDENTS OF THYr TdWN OF VAIL f~RE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROFOSAL AND ASIA THAT YQU RESPOND TO THI: WISHES OF THE PEOPI.Ir ?,1VD REJECT THIS REQLiEST, SINCERELY, _ PRTI~ ~ r.~ ~ N VAII- C1r, - ~'a.~ c ~ ~ 5uc,. ~ _ 1153 ~a C.r'~~ ~ ~ _ ~ i NOVEMBER 22, 1993 I PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION TOWN OF VAIL 75 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD VAIL, COLORADO 81657 . LADIES.AND GF.NTLIII~N, . YOU HAVE B~rvF,E YOU TODAY A REQUEST FOR A S'JBDMSION OF LOT BLOCK 4, VAIL VILLAGE THIRD FII.ING ALSO KNOWN AS 381 BEAVER DAM CIRCLE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS Lei i~x IS TO INFORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT ANY DECISION ' THAT WILL ALLOW ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE TOWN OF VAIL OR THAT;WILL INCREASE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE`ALLOWED UNDER THE EXISTING ORDINANCES IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES ON THIS Lei i~R DEMONSTRATE THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE EITHER FULL OR PART TIME RESIDENT'S OF THE TOWN OF VAIL ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND ASK THAT YOU RESPOND TO THE WISHES 6F THE PEOPLE AND REJECT THIS REQUEST. SINCERELY, I PRIIv i~u NAME ~ VA1L ADDRESS SI(INAT[TRE ~ 4 b b Y-a e e 4~ FZn . I 'or ~cR. C~a~~F 3~z -~-~Rr~A.or+ ~c~r+Q?+ 2D. C e.~}~ rr'' ~s~ t10 F l CIT. GU.~ TNE?-i, ~66 F~2E~r R~ i i i ~~N,~-, ~RD ern ~ 1~ To: The Vail Town Council 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 From: Nancy Byers 352 Beaver Dam Circle Vail, Colorado 81657 Re: Appeal of PEC decision to favor rezoning of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing from the Primary/Secondary zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family zone districts, and a minor subdivision to create two lots from the existing lot. Date: November 22, 1993 Dear Town Council Members, As an adjacent property owner to the subject property, I formally appeal by right the decision of the PEC to favor the rezoning and minor subdivision of Lot 1. The PEC vote on this matter was very close ( 4-3) , and there was much discussion from the public as well as the PEC members that the increase in density on this lot is contrary to the goals and objectives of the TOV and the public to limit density to existing zoning in the Valley. Another concern voiced is that this decision will set a dangerous precedent in the valley which will affect twenty-eight additional lots, and create a flood of similar proposals which will be difficult to turn, down given this decision. Property owners on Beaver Dam Road, Forest Road, and Rockledge Road have paid a premium to own property in this area. The intent of the property owners here is that the area would remain as currently zoned, and not have the threat of density increases. This proposal as accepted by the PEC is a slap in the face to all property owners in this area, and as mentioned above it sets a dangerous precedent in the Vail Valley. Our understanding is that we can voice our appeal on December 7, 1993. We all sincerely hope that you as representatives of the public in this valley will reverse this decision and preserve the density and zoning of Lot 1 to its original status as Primary/Secondary. Sincerely, ' Nancy Byers b:\bye_s 1;!22/93.2 j~ , ~ ~~S!lILEG~® AN® C®NF~®EN'TIA~ ~o rC 9 Nome iSde CUy Sae and Pracsd~cs 1~11lB3 _ II .q ~ a 8P1®EX i. I~®a~e i~~Bs ~Bt6es. ii. ~~a~c~ll ~r®~du~rs. iii. ~ ~ta~ts ids ®9 ~thl~s. i~9. ~eBstl®~shlp i~etween the `~®~rn a~~cii srtd tine T®~+ra iNlanager. . ~9. ®elegato®ru ®t ~®wers. Vii. ~roflict ®t interest I~ f~~d ass ®e~lsl®~s. iii. @~ested f~lghts ®rdina~~e. @~iii. SPhe ®pe~ fi~eetings i~ws. iX. 11~n~l A~~~isitl®ra i~r®gra~u ial®vv ~Ptsrt. Moms Wde Gly 9:..,.:..: mi0 Roe~d~ae 12lIf93 ~ r, ~ f I _ I. Home Rule Cities. In 1912, the home rule amendment to the Constitution of the State of Colorado was adopted which provided that the people of any city on town having a population of 2,000 inhabitants should have the power to adopt is Charter which would be its basic organic law and extend~to all its local and municipal matters. The amendment provided that ordinances made in local 'and municipal matters, within the jurisdiction of the town or city would supersede any flaw of the state which conflicted with the local ordinance. By amendment in 1970; the requirement for 2,000 inhabitants was eliminated. In July 1972, with the adoption of its home rule charter, the Town of Vail became a home rule municipality. I The principal difference between home rule cities and statutory cities and towns relates to their powers and their ability. to be controlled by the state Jegislature. Statutory as opposed to home rule towns and cities may not enact ordinances which attempt to supersede or nullify a state statute. Home rule cities, on the other hand, can, as previously stated, enact laws which conflict with state statutes 'within their jurisdiction in certain situations. The powers of home rule cities to .legislate ordinances which may conflict with state statutes are limited to local and municipal matters. What is local as distinguished from general and statewide? The words "local and municipal" appearing in Article XX of the Constitution is not an expression which is_fixed in its meaning. What is local as distinguished from general and statewide depends somewhat on time and circumstances. The home rule amendment specifically made the regutatiori of municipal elections, the levy and collection of . taxes for municipal pufposes, and. special assessments, matters of municipal concem. The courts, in their decisions, have indicated that the state legislature cannot strip a home rule city of~ its constitutionally granted power to deal with municipal elections,. cannot enact a~ law which would deny to a home rule city its constitutional power to exercise the right of eminent domain, and, cannot prohibit a home rule city from exercising its power to enact purely local excise taxes and - sales taxes. A home rule city may pass a viable ordinance which supersedes a . state statute upon the.same subject matter where the matters contained therein are matters of exclusively local concern. Other matters which have been determined to be of local and municipal concern are: ~ I 1. The regulation of the speed of motor vehicles, ~ i 2. The regulation of traffic, 3. Construction .of off-street parking facilities, I 4. Adoption of sales and use tax, 5. Financing a program of capital improvements, i i , 'e _ 6. Assessment against property for. local improvements, 7. Zoning, and Business and occupational privilege taxes. The preceding list is by no means exclusive, but is set forth just to give some idea of the type of things the courts have ruled to be of local concern. Batters exclusively of statewide concem may be controlled by state statute, even in home rule cities, and in. such matters the statute will always supersede conflicting local laws. The determination of whether a matter is of statewide importance or one of local and municipal concem is often difficult. It may depend upon statutory enactment or the general nature of the subject matter. There is no definite rule to be used in making. the determination. Fortunately, however, in many instances the courts have already made the determination for us. The courts in Colorado have come to recognize that there are matters which may be both of statewide and local concem as opposed to one or the other. In situations which are of both focal and statewide concern, there is nothing improper about legislation on the saPiie subject by both, the home rule city and the state absent some conflict between the two regulations. The mere enactment of a law by the state does- not constitute preemption by the state of the matter regulated. If the subject matter:is exclusively of~statewide concern and the ordinance conflicts . with the statute, the ordinance will .fail. fn~ purely local matters where there is a conflict between a statute and an ordinance., the ordinance supersedes the statute. lA/here 4here is both an ordinance and a statute and they are not in conflict, but the ordinance goes further in its prohibition, there is nothing contradictory between them and they can both exist. The state constitution provides that the charter of a home rule city shall be its 'organic law and extend to all its local and municipal matters. In other words, the home rule charter of the Town of Vail is its constitution. It constitutes a limitation on the T'own's powers relating to local and municipal matters. It acts as a limitation on the powers granted by Article XX of the state constitution as to local and municipal matters. ff there is not charter prohibition, and a matter is of local and municipal-concem, the Town Council may pass legislation affecting the subject matter. i f. 11. Town Council Procedure. - The Town Council is required by Section 4.1 of the Charter to meet at least twice each month. Section 4.6 of the Charter provides that the Council,,shall act only by ordinance, resolution, or motion. All laws passed by the Town Council must be in the form of an ordinance. 1n addition, Section 4.8 of the Town Charter provides that every act making an appropriation, creating an indebtedness, authorizing borrowing of money, levying any -tax, authorizing the ,sale of any real property, establishing any rule or regulation for the violation of which a penalty is imposed, or placing any burden upon or limiting the use of private property must be by ordinance. In other areas, the Council may act by resolution or by motion. Resolutions are required by the Charter to be in writing, numbered, and recorded in the official records of the Town. Motions are verbal and are ;the least formal way of doing business. Except for emergency ordinances, the Charter provides in Section 4.10 the following procedure for enactment of ordinances. (a) The ordinance shall be introduced at any regular meeting of the Council by any member thereof. (b) The ordinance shall be read in full, or in cases where copies of the `ordinance have been available to the Council and are or have been made available to the public, said ordinance may be ready by title only. (c) - After the first reading of the ordinance, the same shall be approved with or without amendment or rejected by a vote of the. Council. ~ (d) If the ordinance is approved on first reading, it shall be published once in full. The Council shall set a day, hour, and place at which the Council shall hold the public hearing on the ordinance, and notice of said day, hour, and place shall be 'included in the first publication. (e) The ordinance shall be introduced a second time at a meeting not earlier than seven days after first publication for final approval, rejection, or other action as may be taken by a vote of the Council. ' (f) An ordinance, if amended subsequent to its last publication, shall be published in full after final passage; but if not amended, it shall be published either by title or in full as the Council may determine. (g) Whenever an ordinance shall be published by reference ~ or by title, the - publication shall contain a summary of the subject matter of said ordinance, and shall contain a notice to the public that copies of, the proposed ordinance are available at the Office of the Town Clerk. The publication of any ordinance by reference or by title as provided herein must set forth in full any penalty clause contained in said ordinance. Ii i ~p The Charter, in Section 4.99, also provides for the passage of emergency ordinances by the Town Council for the preservation of public property, health, welfare, peace, or safety. The ,courts have generally left a determination as to what constitutes an emergency for the .preservation of public property, health, welfare, peace, or safety, 4o the sole determination of the Town Council. Unless some type of fraud is involved, courts are extremely reluctant to overrule a legislative body's determination that such an emergency exists. In order to pass an emergency ordinance, there must be a unanimous vote of all Councilmen present at the meeting, or a vote of 5 Councilmembers, whichever is less. Further, the pacts showing such urgency and.need must be specified in the ordinance itself. The Charter provides that no emergency ordinance may flake a grant of special privilege, levy takes, or fix Pates charged by any Town owned utility. An emergency ordinance requires passage at only one meeting of the Town Council, . and neither a public hearing nor a:first publication as is required for ordinary ordinances is required. In addition, an emergency ordinance takes effect immediately upon final passage; as opposed to a regular ordinance which takes effect live days after publication following second reading and final passage. One publication of an emergency ordinance is required within ten days after passage or as soon thereafter as is possible. , The Town Council may also call a special meeting if it so desires. However, any ordinance considered at a special meeting. must meet the voting requirements of an emergency ordinance - in other words, it shall be approved only by unanimous vote of all Councilmen presen4 or a vote of five Councilmen, whichever is less. 1'he. Municipal Code in Section 2.04.060 provides that, "Regular and special meetings of the. Tov~n Council held in accordance with Section 4.9 and 4.2 of the Charter of the Town, -while open to the public and citizens of the Town, fundamentally are administrative hearings, their principal purpose of which are to enable the Council to obtain information, consider, and determine legislative and administrative matters." . Finally, Section 2.04.090 of the AAunicipal Code provides that Roberts' Rules of Order generally govern the public meetings of the Town Council. 7 FWmo Fide City Subata+w and Roeodme 12/'11&1 i i F. - 111. State Code of Ethics. . Article 18 of Title 24 provides a code of ethics for public officials. Where the Town Charter conflicts with the State statute, the Charter prevails. They statute provides " the following rules of conduct for all public officials and employees including local governmental officials. It states .that a public officer, member of the general assembly, local govemment official, or employee shall not: (a) Disclose or use confidential information acquired in the course of his official duty in order to further substantially his personal financial interests; or . (b) Accept a gift of substantial value or a substantial economic benefit - tantamount to a gift of substantial value: I (i) Which would tend improperly to influence a reasonable person in his position to depart from the faithful and impartial;discharge of his public duties; or ~ (ii) Which he knows or which a reasonable person! in his position should know under the circumstances is primarily~for the purpose of rewarding him for official action he has taken. I - An economic benefit tantamount to a gift of substantial value includes without limitation a loan at a rate'of interest substantially lower than the commercial rate then currently prevalent for similar .loans and compensation received for private services rendered of a rate substantially exceeding the fair market value of such ' services. ~ The statute goes on to exempt the following from consideration as gifts: i (a) Campaign contributions reported as required by Section 1-45-108, C.R.S.; i (b) An occasional non-pecuniary gift, insignificant in value; (c) Anon-pecuniary award publicly presented by anon-profit] organization in recognition of public service; (d) Paymant of or reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for travel and subsistence for attendance at a convention or other meeting at _ which such public officer or member of the general assembly, local government official, or employee is scheduled to participate. (e)~_ Reimbursement for or acceptance of an opportunity to participate in a social function. or a meeting which is offered to such public officer, member of the general assembly, local government official, or employee which is not extraordinary when viewed in light of the position held'~by such public _ officer, member of the general assembly, local govemment official, or employee. i i it i - ~ - a (f) items of perishable or non-permanent value including but not limited to meals, lodging, travel expenses, or tickets to sporting, recreational, educational, or cultural events; (g) Payment for speeches, debates or other public events, reported as honorariums; (h) Payment of salary from employment, including other government ' employment, in addition to that earned from being a member of the general assembly. The law sets forth the following rules of conduct specifically for local govemment officials and employees. A local government official or local govemment employee shall not: (a) 1Engage in a substantial financial transaction for his private business purposes with a person whom he inspects or supervises in the course of his official duties; or . . (b) Perform an official act directly and substantially effecting to its economic benefit a business or other undertaking in which he either has a substantial financial interes4 or is engaged as counsel, consultant, representative or agent. It goes on to state that a member of the governing body of a local govemment . uvho has a personal or private interest in any ;matter proposed or pending before the governing bodyshall disclose such interest to the governing body and shall not vote thereon and shall refrain .from attempting to influence the decisions of the other members of the governing body in voting on the matter. However, the law allovus a member of the~local governing body to vote notwithstanding the previous provision if.his participation is necessary to obtain a quorum and if he discloses his conflict in interest in writing to the Secretary of State and if he states for the record the fact and summary nature of the interest disclosed at the time of performing the act. Finally, another section of this law provides that local government officials or employees shall not be interested in any contract made by them under their official capacity or by any body, agency or board of which they are members or employees. The sections goes on to state that: (a) "13e interested in" does not include holding a minority interest in a COrporatl0n. (b) Contract does not include: (i) Contracts awarded to the lowest responsible bidder based on competitive bidding procedures. . ~ r' (ii) Merchandise sold to the highest bidder at public auctions. - (iii) Investments or deposits in financial institutions which are in the business of loaning or receiving monies. (iv) A contract with an interested party if, because Hof geographic restrictions, a local .government could not otherwise reasonably afford itself or the subject of the contract. It shall beipresumed that - a local government could not otherwise reasonably afford itself of the subject of a contract if the.additional cost to theigovernment is greater than 10% of `a contract with an interested party or if the contract is for. services that must be performed within a limited time period and no other contractor can provide those services within that time period. ~ (v) A contract with respect to which any member of the general assembly, public officer, local government. official, or employee has disclosed a personal interest and has not voted thereon any such disclosure. shall be made: to the governing body, for local government officials and employees; in accordance with the rules of the House of Representatives and the Senate for members of the general assembly; and to the Secretary of State for all others. Our home rule charter is more restrictive in regard to Councilmembers' interests in contracts than the new State law. Our charter provides in Section 3.7 than no member of - .the Council, during his term of office, shall be a salaried employee of the Town nor shall .he have any direct or indirect financial interest in anv contract with the Town. It exempts contracts with corporations in which members of Council have less than a 10% interest in any class of securities of such corporation and further allows minor incidental transactions as approved by the Council. In the past, the Council has determined that minor transactions are those which have a dollar value of less than $500.Q0. Where our charter and the State statutes conflict, our charter controls. The state law does not provide for any criminal penalties for violation ofl its provisions. It does provide that every contract made ~ in violation of any of its provisions shall be voidable at the insistence of any party tolthe contract except the officer interested therein. i 10 _ ~ s 0@~0 [~elatl®nshlp between the ~'®wr~ ur~olu ar~d the T®w~ Mar~agero Section 9.4 of 4he Town Charter provides that the municipal government of the Town of Vail shall be known as "Council-Manager govemment." This section of the Charter gives all powers to enact local legislation, adopt budgets, determine policies, and appoint the Town Manager, to the Town Council. It gives the power to execute the laws and administer the Town government to the Town Manager. Section 6.3 of the Town Charter sets forth more specifically the powers and duties of the Town Manager as foNows: "(a) Se responsible for the enforcement of the laws and ordinance of the Town; (b) Hire, suspend, transfer, and remove Town employees; (c) Rflake appointments on the basis of executive and administrative ability and of the training and experience of such appointees in the work which they are to perform; (d) Cause a budget to be prepared annually and submit to the Council and be responsible for the administration of the budget after its adoption; (e). Prepare and submit to the. Council as of the end of the fiscal year a complete report on the finances acid administrative activities of the Town for the preceding year, and~upon request of the Council, make written or verbal reports at any time concerning the affairs of the Town under his supervision; , (f) Keep-the Council advised of the financial condition and future needs of the Town and make such recommendations to the Council for adoption as he may deem necessary or expedient; (g) Exercise supervision and control over all executive and administrative departments, and recommend to the Council any proposal he thinks advisable `to establish, consolidate, or abolish administrative departments; (h) 13e responsible for the enforcement of all terms and conditions imposed in favor of the Town and any contract or public utility franchise and upon ~knowledge.of any violation thereof, report the same to the Council for such action and proceedings as may be necessary to enforce the same; (i) Attend Council meetings and participate in discussions with 4he Council in an advisory capacity; (j) Establish a system of accounting and auditing for the Town which shall reflect, in accordance Frith generally accepted accounting principles, the financial condition and financial operation of the Town; 9 9 ~ ~ ae~,oo vw a«~e,zn,~ I • L ~I (k) Provide for engineering, architectural, maintenance, and construction - services required by the Town; (I) Serve in ex officio capacity on all present and future boards, committees, and commissions of the Town; (m) Perform other such duties as may be prescribed by this Charter, or by ordinance, or by other applicable law or required of him by Council, which are not inconsistent with this Charter." The Charter further clarifies the relationship between the Town Council and the Town Manager, and the administrative staff in Section 6.4 whichjspecifies: "Neither the Council, its members, the Mayor nor any Council committee, shall dictate the appointment of any person to office by the Town Mari'ager,: except as otherwise provided in this Charter,.or in any way interfere with they Town Manager or other Town officer to prevent him from exercising his judgment in the appointment or employment of officers and employees in the administrative service. Except.., for the. purpose, of inquiry, the. Council and its members, the Mayor, and any Council committee shall deal with the administrative service solely through the Town Manager, and' neither the Council, its members; the Mayor, nor Y . any Council committee thereof, shall give orders to any of the subordinates of the Town Manager." i . . _ i 1 G Xame ills City a;Demnos m,a RoesOve lznrea ~I , @90 ®eeegatl®~ ~®werso A legislative body like the Town Council cannot delegate the power to make a law, ~tiich necessarily involves the discretion as to what the law shall be, but it can confer upon others the power to execute the law or to determine some fact or state of t9ings to effectuate the purpose of the law. ~ The Town of Vail, like most municipalities, has delegated certain powers to certain commissions and boards. ANos4 of the commissions established by the Town Council are strictly advisory, however, there are 4vvo permanent agencies -the Planning and Environmental Commission and the Design Review Board -which have been given somewhat more than an advisory role by the Town Council. The major delegated duties of the Planning and Environmental Commission are: approval or denial of major or minor subdivisions in accordance with Title 97 of the Code, granting or denying variances in accordance with Chapter 98.62 of the Code, and granting or denying conditional use permits in accordance with Chapter 9 8.60 of the Code. The decision. of the Planning and Environmental Commission is final in regard to these matters unless an item is appealed to the Town Council or called up by the Town Council itself. The. Planning and Environmental Commission also is delegated two important advisory roles by the nAunicipal Code. It makes recommendations to the Town Council on all applications for amendments to the Town zoning ordinances, and it adopts master plans and amendments thereto for approval by the Town Council. Upon receiving recommendations from the Planning and Environmenta! Commission in these areas, the ,Town Council should of course carefully review and consider the Planning and Environmental Commission's recommendations, but the Town Council is in no way bound by them. The Design Review Board is given .the power, by Chapter 9 8.54, to approve or deny the design of sfructures to be built within the Town and, by Chapter 96, to approve or_deny the design of signs to be placed within the Town. The decisions of the Design (Review Board in these fi~o areas is final unless the matter is appealed or called up by the Town Council. Th.e Design Review Board also recommends to the Town Council whether or not to approve sign code variances. (This is confusing because variances granted by the Planning and Environmental Comm'issiori relating to zoning matters are not advisory while variances to the sign code acted upon by the Design Review Board are.) Again, as is the case with matters which the Planning and Environmental Commission acts in and advisory capacity, recommendations of the Design Review Board in the area of sign code variances should be carefully considered, but they are not binding on Town Council action. 9 3 ~ ~,a „a ~ ate,. ,z„,~ . ~ i VI. Conflict of Interest In Land Use Decisions. ~ Case and statutory law has been inconsistent in a number of ways in addressing conflicts of interest in land use decisions. Courts have difficulty in determining whether conflicts of interest are a proper subject of judicial review,. If a court finds a land use decision contaminated by bias or prejudice rather than~financial conflict of interest, the Court is less likely to find the decision to be a proper subject for judicial review. Statues of the State of Colorado and ordinances of the Town and the Charter of'the Town are directed at controlling financial conflicts of interest rather than bias or prejudice. However, the line between the two is a hazy one. Typical conflicts of interest situations involve decision makers who will personally incur a financial loss or gain because of the decision or who have a personal or business relationship, often employment, with one who will gain.or lose financially because of the decision. Situations involving decision makers who have publicly stated a position on a matter prior to a hearing, or who have had contact outside - the proceedings, with a party or who have some relationship with a party or one of the lawyers, witnesses or organizations involved are usually said to involve bias or prejudice. In bias situations the question a Court must decide~is at what point is an interested party deprived of a fair hearing before impartial decision makers. In deciding if a land use decision involving bias or prejudice is the proper subject `of judicial review, the Courts must make a very difficult decision -whether the land use decision is legislative or judicial in nature. Colorado Courts; have held that when a governing body adopts a general zoning. ordinance or a land use plan this action affects an open class- of individuals, is general in nature and the Court will not inquire into the motives behind the legislation. The Courts have held that in such situations, legislators are acting _in a legislative manner, are responsible to - the electorate, and .that attempts. to influence legislation .are a part of our form of government. In addition, Courts ha"ve held that if the proceedings are legislative in nature, any rights of procedural-due .process are minimal and the Courts have a reduced interest in the need of a hearing before an impartial tribunal. i At the other end of the spectrum are decisions that directly affect the interests of a particular applicant such conditional use permits, variances, and rezonings. .Hearings on such matters have been characterized by Colorado Courts as quasi- judicial and the Courts have not only looked at financial conflicts~of interest, but also at the bias or prejudice of the individuals making the decisions. In such situations, Colorado Courts have recognized the existence of a right to a hearing before an impartial tribunal. ' • i In situations where there are financial conflicts of interest, it is clear that a Vail Councilmember must disqualify himself. In situations where bias or prejudice may be present, the decision whether to vote or not is a much more difficult one. Before a Councilmember makes the decision whether to vote or ;not, he should consider tFie fact that in a quasi; judicial hearing, so long as parties;and witnesses are given an opportunity to:be heard, the record.provides the reasons to support any given actions, and a Court cannot show arbitrary, capricious, or illegal actions - or bad faith or bias, the action of the Council is going to be upheld in Court. . • 14 ~ ~.~a.ro .s,~,~ ~I . _ (~®rald ®ah0 ~ CMI~ Genera8 CounseU ll~t ~ (Editor's note: Thistoplchasbeen the subjecf of two prior articles in Colorado RAunicipalities. The first article appeared !n the September/ OcPober 9976 Issue and was au- ® ® thored by Tad Foster, Assistant City of 1~~t f l~,~~~~t Attorney forColorado Springs. The second article appeared in the A~/arcft/ • ~4pril 9986 issue and was authored by Susan Griffiths, formerCl~IL Gen- e eral Counsel.) ssume 4ha4 you are a member • • . of 4he board of 4rustees in a small municipality. Your community is 30 miles from 4he nearest town and often isolated in winter by moun4ain passes. In February, a water main freezes and breaks. 14 needs 40. be ~ dug up immedia4ely and repaired o or the ~n4ire system will freeze, ®~g~~~fl ~ 11~~r~ costingthe4own4housandsofdoilars _ 4o repair, with no water in the mean- - ~~~St~%~t~ ~1~~ ~®~1~1~ ~~tt~ R11~ time. You own 4he only backhoe in _ flown. The flown board asks you 40 ~~~~dt~r~~ Il ~~~~~®~S do 4he excava4ion work and bill E~1~~~~5~ ~~15~ them. Can you do the job? A second example: You own 4he only gas s4a4ton in flown. Can you _ 'sell gasoline 40 4he town, in order 40 save 4he expense of driving 4he police cars on a 60-mite round 4rip 40 fill up a4 4he nex4 community? . Under 4he law as i4 exis4ed in Colorado prior to the spring of 4his year 4he.answer 4o both ques4ions would be no. Bo4h con4rac4s would have been prohibited conflic4s of in4ePes4. Ido written or oral disclo- ~~)~®Pv~ - auras or abstentions from vo4ing _ arouid have cured 4he problems. ~?f4er 4his issue of Colorado RAunlcipalities went to press, 4he i3o4h would have viola4ed a por4ion Colorado Devisor of Statu4es~lssued 8988 Replacemen4 Volume of~section 31-4.404, C.R.S., which, 10A,, in which 4he ee~a4erial enac4ed by HI3 9 209 appears. For until A~arch 9 8, 9 988, read in part .modification purposes,, 4he revisor eenumbered 4he new ae4icle of ~ follows: ~'i41e 24 enac4ed by H®1209. All references 4o aC4icle ~ T In H~ 1209 (n] or shall any such member b® in4ea . should be CPianged 40 ar4lcle 98, as 4hey appear in 4he codified ®sled, dlrec4lyorindtrectly,in4heprofits s4a4a4e books. (Eicample: 24-1q-101 becomes 24.18-101). of any contractorjobtorworkorseroices _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4o be performed for th® city or flown. 9~ Colorado AAuniciRalFties~PlovemberOecember 9988 'i ~ The above language was deleted interested In the discharge of his offlcia~ The General Assembl by the Colorado General Assembly y dut(es. On the record he did not serve during its 1988 legislative session. endCted tW0 b111S with an eye single to the public weal _ In place of this blanket.prohibition, [h]e took advantage of the favorable the General Assembly enacted two COntdllililg Slg`I11flt:lnt action of the board to work his own bills containingsignificantnewrules neW rules Which d11OW enrichment and thecountysundoing° - which allow municipal officials to munici al ®ffici~ls to disclose such interests and to ab- P The most recent decision in Colo- stain from voting on them. This pro- d1SC1OSe S11Ch interest redo on this subject is Berkley Met- cedure now allows the official to and to abstain from rtipolitan District v. Poland' a 1985 retain the interest in the contract Colorado Court of Appeals case in ~ This article will describe 4he new VOtlllg On them which a member of a water and rules for the identification and dis- ,sanitation district board also served closure of conflicts of interest, as public officers contractingwiththem- as a paid ;consultant to the board ' well as their legal implications from selves and for their owri benefit.'` over a period of several years. After the perspective .of the Colorado In the 1933 case of People v. some changes in its makeup the municipal official. Naturally, this arts- Brown,` the Colorado Supreme board elected to abrogate the con- tract and brought suit to recover cle cannot serve as the substitute Court relied upon School District v. for legal advice from the municipal .Pomponi for the proposition that a the compensation and expenses , attorney. It is intended only to alert public official may not contractwith Paid The Court of Appeals applied .Colorado municipal officials to sig- himself to his own profit In that the common law rule that public nificant. new limits of permitted ac- case, a county treasurer had specu- Policy forbids public officers from tivity. You should consult your attor- ~ lated in tax certificates belonging ~ntracting with themselvesfortheir ney for advice in specific cases. to the county, The Court held that own benefit, citing Schoo! District v. the actions of the treasurer"did not .Pomponi and People v. Brown. Colorado Case f1.aw effect any change as to the rights of The fact 'that the board member A quick review of the signirficant the county. to the funds realized had excused himself from voting or cases decided by Colorado courts from the redemptionie and stated deliberation on the contract each . ~on public officiafs'conflicts ofinter- the common law rule inthese mem- time it was discussed by the board ' est may be helpful before describing orable terms: was held to have no effect on its the recently enacted statutes: The invalidity. Neitherwas it significant ' general rule .at common law (law Brown was a minister of the law, bound that the district had ratified the derived from decisions of the courts) by his oath and every canon to be dis- (continued on page 20) was that public officials were com- ~ } Y pletely prohibited from entering into ~ any contract with the government it , ~ they served. No amount of disclosure, _ I~I ~ abstention,steppingdown, orother ~ ll u~::. ~ 38 YEARS Y®lJ N G! safeguards were felt to be adequate I~ ~ ~ - ~ to protect the public from self-dealing ! by public officials. -!f _ The Colorado Courts adhered to this common law rule. In the 1926 Concrete', StreetS- _ - r case of Schoo/District #98 v.Pom- - a w/$e /nve$tment poni,' two members of a school ,district board were Officers Of a Seventeenth Street Denver company with which the schdoldis- trict .had contracted. The statute An example of a long lasting concrete street in Colorado. prohibited officers of school districts .Concrete streets last longer, and require less maintenance. . from making contracts in which they Specify concrete pavements-the best value over the long j had an interest. The Colorado Su- term. ' preme Court invalidated the con- ` tract as "against public policy and 'i void or voidable irrespective of any, fO1' f117O1'e InfO~flldtlOn, COntdCt: ~ statute The fact that the school ~ district had benefitedfinanciallyfrom C the contract and had not in any manner been cheatedbytheofficials . CO1O"ADO ieAD1 11fED 'Oi'`""'`"""'"s""' ' was immaterial in the face of "fhe c"~"eo~+'~"?00 ~ rule of public policy, which prohibits ''0785 ~ Colorado Municipalities/November•December 1988 ~ 19 I payments 40 4he board member as Municipal officials may now par- 4hey were made and had, in fact, A~Itani~Pa~ ®fficiaYs may ticipa4e in contracts involving their - received value for its money. The ~gtiCg atEm ~ municipality if 4hey make proper Cour4 upheld 4he 4rial court's deci- P P disclosure of their interes4 and ab- sion 4ha4 the agreem®nt i4setf was ~OI~~~~tS YIIi~®11~~ ~~lE~ s4ain from voting and from attemp4- illegal and 4herefore void at 4he ~ ing to influence other members of ou4set P ~ 4he governing body on 4he issue. This common law rule, in conceet Y11d~S~ P~®Pi`I' ~1S11AS1YY~ This obviously includes refraining wi4h 4he prohibi4ion in (former) seo- ~ a1a~$tdlii frOmm~ ~®tan~ from participation in any delibera- 4ion 31-4-404, prior to i4s amend- 4ions, meetings, or conversations rrten4 in 1988, has proved a source ~ fg®~ atte~Ptin~ t® leading up 4o the actual vote on the of Peal hardship 40 COIOPSdO munlCl- lY1fY11~~Ci~ ®t~lf`1° ilillg>i~~9EYS contrac4 or other matter. Finally, pal officials. Many si4ua4ions euis4, new subsection 31-4-404(3) allows particularly in small communities, ®f ~®d'y° 4fie meenbertovo4e notwithstanding where 4he only provider of a vi4al his conflic4 if participation is "neo- municipal need (construc4ion equip- essary to obtain a quorum or other- • anen4, gasoline, mechanical repairs, . sled on 4he provision of4he Colorado wise enable the' body to act," bu4 Consti4ution applicable 4o members office supplies) has been a business only if the member complies with owned or opera4ed by a member of ~ 4he General Assemby. the volun4ary disclosure provisions 4he board of4rus4eesorci4ycouncil. The League draffed 4he measure of section 24.17-110. This latter Local businessmen in Colorado's and actively supported its passage. section was enac4ed as a part of HS communities have a long and proud As amended; new subsections 31- 1209 during the 1988 legisla4ive 4radi4ion of public service. 14 is no4 4'404(2) and (3), C.R.S. now read session. suPprising ttia4 conflicts of in4eres4 under 4he prior statute and case (a) Any member of the governing body H~ 1 a09 (July 1, 1988) law have been a problem. ~ of any city ortown who has a personal or private interes4 in any matter proposed or pending before the governing body Structure of 4he Ac4 HS 9.®57 (AAarch 18, 1 g88) - shall disclose such interest to the goy- The 1988 session of the General The General .Assembly changed emirtg body and shall not vote thereon, Assembly also saw 4he enactmen4 the statu4ory rules applicable, 4o and shah refrain from attempting. to tn- of a significan4 and somewhat com- conflic4s of in4eres4 of Colorado fluence file decisions of 4he other mem• ,plea statute setting forth standards municipal officials with the passage begs of the governing body in voting on pf Conduct for public officials and of H(3 1057, signed in4o law on 4he matter. employees a4 all levels of govern- March 18,1988, by Gov. Romer. HB (3) A member of 4hB governing body of men4 in Colorado, both state and 1057, sponsored by Rep. Sam Wil- any,cityorYOwn may vote notwithstand- local. HB 1209, sponsored by Rep. ing subsection (2) of 4his section if his liams of l3recicenridge and Sen. Sally participation is necessary 40 obtain quo- . -Chris Paulsen of Englewood and -Hopper of Golden, elirriinated 4he `rum or othenuise enable 4he bodyto act Sen. Jeff Wells of Colorado Springs, absolute prohibition of 4he former ' if he complies with the voluntary discio- specifically applies 40 officers and lady, replacing i4 with a rule of dis-' sure provisions of section 24.17-110, employees of local governmen4s, closureandabstention,closelymod- C.R.S. which are defined 4o include 4he government of a county, city and county, city, flown, special district, or school distric48 HB 1209 can be broken down in4o four groups of new standards applicable 4o governmen4 officials: • , . 1. Absolu4e rules of conduct, 2. nonbinding ethical principles, ~ ~ ° " ' " • ' ~ 3. written disclosure rules, and 4. new rules relating to interests - • - • ~ • . by public officials in governmen4 contracts. . • • - . • The General Assembiys effort 40 . ~ . • _ • • • • • • distinguish be4ween binding rules • • • • - ~ of conduct and nonbinding "ethical principles" is generally described • • • in 4he legislative declaration, which provides in part: ~0 Colorado RAuniclpalltiesl~?ovemberDecember 9988 ' ~ The general assemby hereby declares. lion acquired in the course of official ~ that the prescription of some standards duties when used to "further sub- Section 24-17-1~4 of conduct common to those citizehs stantiate personal financial inter- ; involved wifh government is beneficial est"" This section also prohibits prohibltS' the disclosure ` to all residents of the state. The provi- • sions of this part 1 recognize that some . accepting a gift of substantial value. Of Confidential infOrmataOn actions are conflicts per se between or of substantial economic benefit Nit would"improperly influence" a acquired I>tn the course public duty and private interest while other actions may or may not pose such reasonable person or if a reasonable of official duties when conflicts depending upon the surround- Person should know it is primarily S used $O "'further ing circumstances.° reward for official action." This pro- hibition has a parallel in.the Colo- substantiate personal White it is helpful that the ethical rado criminal code atsection 18-8-_ financial Ilntere3t.r' principles are described as nonbind- 302, concerning bribery. Section ing, including both binding and nom 24.17.104 goes on to prohibit a binding rules for conflicts of interest public official or employee from ao- Subsection (3) of section 24.17- maylead tosome difficulty in inter- ceptirig economic benefits, includ- .109 duplicates the changes made prating anal applying the act Be- ing loans issued at lower than the to section 31-4-404 by H6 1057. ~ cause of its complexity and poten- . commercial rate and compensation That is, a member of the governing tial interrelationship with other pro- for services rendered which exceed body of a local government who visions of law (including section 31- the fair market value of those sear- has a personal or private interest in 4-404, applicable only to municipal ices 13 _ any matter proposed or pending officials, and the criminal code seo- Happily, section 104 lists a Horn- before the governing body must lions dealing-with bribery and eon bar of "safe harbors"items not con- disclose they interest to the body, rapt influences), fhe municipal of- sidered gifts of substantial value or not vote thereon, and refrain from - ficial is cautioned to seek the advice gifts of subs4antialeconomic bane- attempting to influence the other of the municipal attorney in comply- :fit. These include campaign contri- members of the body." Also, and in ing with HB 1209. butigns, occasional i~significant~gifts, parallel to section 31-4-404(3), it is nonpecuniary awards for public serv- Permissible to vote despite the con- (Mandatory) Rules of Conduct ice, actual and necessary travel, flict if the official's participation is Two separate portions of the act and subsistence expenditures for necessary to obtain a quorum or establish mandatory rules of con- public duties, perishable or non- otherwise enable the body to act, duct.Section 24-17-104 establishes permanent items (including tickets but only ifwritten disclosure is made rotes of conductforall publicofficers, to sporting, recreational, education,. to'the Colorado Secretary of State members of the General Assembly, ~ or cultla~al events), honoraria, and under the written disclosure provi- and local government officials and payment of salary from other gov- sions enacted by section 24-17- employees, while section 24.17- ernment employment14 110.18 109. establishes additional rules only Section 24;17-109 also contains for local government officials and some"safe harbors." It is permissible employees. Section 24-17-104 pri- Section 24-17-109 is entitled to use local governmentfacilities or manly concerns prohibited conduct "Rules of Conduct for Local Govern- equipment to communicate or cor- in connection with. a "personal fi- ment Officials and Employees." It respond with constituents, family a nancial interest," which in turn is should be carefully reviewed by members, ors business associates, . ' defined as including: municipal officials and municipal and to accept or receive a benefit employees. Prohibited conduct as an"indirectconsequenceoftrans- ' 1. An ownership interest in a busi- under this section includes: acting local government businessn18 Hess; Both sections 24-17-104 and 109 2. a creditor interest in an insol- 1. Engaging in a substantial fi- employ the standard of proof "be- vent business; ~ nancial transaction for private busi- yond a reasonable doubtr40 This is _ 3. an employment or prospective Hess purposes with a person whom a relatively high standard of proof. ' employment forwhich negotiations the local government official or em- In trial practice this standard would • have begun; ployee inspects or supervises in favor the overnment official. It is ' f 4. an ownership interest in real or the course of official duties,'s or more than a mere °preponderence" _ personal property; 2. performing an official act directly of proof and requires that the over- i 5. a loan or other debtor interest; and substantially affecting to its w.helming majority of the evidence or ~ economic benefit a business orother point toward a violation before .t 6. a directorship or.officership in undertaking iri which the local gov- will be considered proven. a business.10 ernment official or employee has ~ - either a substantial financial inter- Ethical princlples Section 24-17-104 prohibits the est~or is engaged as counsel, con- Section 24i 17-105 of HB 1209 is disclosure of confidential informa- sultant, representative, or agent18 (continued on page 22) . i Colorado MunicipalitieyNovember•December 1988 ~ 21 I I , . ,,(~patfl~sts og ia9iertesit_ _ _ entitled "ethical principles for public in 4he private sec4or after leaving officers, local governmen4 officials governmen4service(onlywheresuch - - and employees." By 4he terms of employment would bespecially ad- ~eC#1®all 24~17~Y~® 4he sec4ion, 4hese principles are van4aged by the official's having regl'~e§ tag yy~gtfl~Ig guidelines 4o conduc4 and do no4 seared in governmen4)a4 ~1S~®51111' t~~ necessarily constitu4e vlola4ions if 4hey are no4 followeda' iila4urally, Wrd44®n dlsclosuree S~Cd'g{ ®f S$dt~ 4he municipal official ~rould be wise Section 24.17.11® Z'10T1' ~C$la1 lath 40 observe 4hese guides 4o avoid This sec4ion isreferenced bysec- ~ ~ any appearance of impropriety. Sec 4ion 39.4-404(3), which in 4urn al- ~ IIl~alatelr W111~1 II1d~ 4ion 105 sets forth 4hree such guides: lows municipal officials 4o vo4e on a i~l~lal~g ®al X115 fl(111C11a'~1 rria44er in which 4hey have an Inter 1.The official should no4 acquire est,'d their participation is necessary ~IIQI $11~ PllbilC t1'LISf~°0 or hold an in4erest in a business or 40 obtain a quorum or otherwise - undertakingwhich he orshebelieves enable the body 4o act The permis- , may be "ciirec4ly and subs4an41ally sibility of such a vote is specifically If the official chooses 4o perform affected 4o its economic benefi4" by conditioned by4he terms of sections 4he official act he orshe mus4"state official action by an agency oeer 31.4-404(3) and 24-1'T-109(3)(b) fortherecord4hefactandsummary which 4he official has substan4ial upon making the wri44en disclosure nature of 4he in4eres4 disclosed a4 au4horityr22 40 4he Secretary of State under 4he 4ime of performing the act'ag 2.The official should not perform sec4ion 24-10-117.Thiswri4tendis- Section 24-17-119 requires 4he an official:ac4 direc4ly and subs4an- closure mus4 include the following: ~rritten disclosure to 4he Secretary 4ially affecting a business or o4her of State be made "priorto [emphasis undertaking 4o i4s economic de4ri- 1.The amoun4 of the in4eres4, added) acting in a manner which menu when 4he official has asub- 2.4he purposes and duration of may impinge on his fiduciary du4y stan4ial financial interes4 in a com- services rendered, and the public 4rus4." Significantly, - pe4ing firm or undertaking23 3.4he compensation received, and if this written disclosure is made, i4 - 3.The section recommends a six 4:sucn other information as nec constitu4es an affirmative defense month mora4orium on employment essary 4o describe the in4erest 4o any civil or criminal action or any o4her sanction28 ~roh(bited acts rela4ing to contracts end clalrns 1-IB 1209 enacted a series of new sections, at sec4ion 24-17-209, et COLORADO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES seq., entitled "Prohibited Ac4s Rela4- ing,to Con4rac4s and Claims." This sec4ion generally prohibits mem- hers ofthe General Assembly, public - 1d~IE7'ING OI<,~'ICE -100 E. 56Eh Ave. officers, and local govemmen4 of- ficials or employees from being in- ,~1erlver, CO 80221 (30J) X28-5297 4erested in a contract made by them - in their official capacity or by an CO CHEMICAL PRODUCTS General. Automotlve, Bathroom, LAvitJectanty agency or board of which 4hey are CUSTOM METAL Bea,, Foatlockera, Pork Benches. sago Pass members Or @mplOyees.~' a FLAGS amer;~,+ colorada Gtstomised Bo,mets Obviously, if this rule were absolute © FURNITURE SYSTEMS 11~"aar sysuem9, Computer A ocrMe tlteniwte and withou4 exception, 14 would a GENERAL SERVICES Buildins BemodeWtg, Concrete wont. ~aanung completely set aside 4he ability to disclose a conflic4 and abstain from MArarwSSES rrBa'rr:c.IS200"`°"'"andFlrePedhlatttemes voting, as discussed above. liow- © PRINTLtiG ~+na. Bt~Itttres,H...,:....-•., stnuonarr, Envekgrs ever, sections 24-17.201. et seq. ®SIGNS .Qvtdoasarrdwoodens?gns,orr~es;gn..wame~,a~ specifically incorporate 4he disclo- o SURPLUS PROPERTY c~.....~ scale Surplus ~penr ~ a nevrly ~aW~ sure and abstention rules. V1STI' va at tatr tranaterretl rtom the Qeportment of Rtlminas~ Local governmen4 officials and ~ ntt~ r~ ~ c ~ B~ employees are permitted 4o have l~ a e~h aye tug omre ~ ` ; 1~~. w~t~~ an interes4 in the following contracts: Phone °2&529' lrqulprttc!nt, t~shlt~ Toots, xeavr Equaptru!ttt... and snore. 1. A minority interest in a COPpora° 4ion, ~ ~ ~ , ~ , u, „r_,~. _„n,,,~:,,~,u, . , , • : _ • _ . ~ ~ ~.1:.. 2. contracts awarded 4o the Iowes4 ~2 Colorado Municipalitie$lPloaem0er0®cember 9988 - , responsible bidder based on com- ~ Generall the here ficial actioni on the mattei'T It Is~ r' petitive bidding, yi ~ possible to read the phrase in sub- - e 3. merchandise sold to the highest fact that .an interested section (1) "to which he is about to bidder at public auctions, member has Voted will act in his official capacity," to limit t - 4. Investments or deposits to fi- the required disclosure onlytothose nancial institutions which are in the render the ordinance circumstances in which the action moneess 'of loaning or receiving Vold, even though it is (the vote or other positive action) is y~ taken. The more conservative, and, 5. a contract with an interested benefiClal t® the City. in this authors opinion, better-rea- party if, because of geographic re- soned view is that the written disclo- strictions, it would cost greater than Statutes, orthe standards of conduct sure to the Secretary of State should ~ 10 percent to contract with anon- for persoriS involved in government be made in either case: whether or" ' interested party (if the contract is established by HB 1209, in title 24 not the official chooses to disclose ~ for services that must be performed of the Colorado Revised Statutes, his interest and abstain. This course within a limited~time period and no may not constitute compliance with of action has the additional benefit ' { other contractor can provide those the requirements of the criminal of.,avoiding any potential violation } services within that time period), code in title 18. of-subsection (3), which makes fail- and Urider the "bribery and corrupt ing to disclose such a conflict of 6. a contract with respect to which influences"article, 18-8-301 et seq., interest a class 2 misdemeanor. the local government official or em- "pecuniary benefit" is more broadly ! ployee 'has disclosed a personal defined than in other statutes and .Void or voidabi®? interest and, not voted thereon, or tnciudes anything "the primary sig- What happens to a contract which voted thereon but made written ~nificanceofwhichiseconomicgain.'as is entered into by an official who disclosure under 31-4-404(3), 24- The criminal .code's approach to has a conflict of interest and either } 17-109(3)(b), and 24-17-110. required disclosure of a conflict of does not disclose that conflict or, i fnterest is somewhat different than after disclosing, votes on the matteft Finally, section 24.17-202 pro- that set forth in either HB 1057 or Thecommonlaw,whiledivided,clear- hibits local govemmentofficials from 1209: Section 18-8-308 governs ly leans towards a majority rule that being purchasers of any sale or the disclosure of confiicts~of inter- the contractjis void. The Colorado vendors at any purchase made by est of public officials in the following Supreme Court has so held in School them iri their official capacity. manner. District v. Pomponi and People v. The important point to be made Brown. The Colorado Court of Ap- concerning sections 24-17-201 ts-8-3o8. Fai?;ng to disclose a conflict peals as Tate as 1985 has so held in y, through 24-17-204 is that they spe- of interest (1) A public servant commits Berkley Metropolitian District v. Po- ~ ~ ~ failing fo disclose a conflict of interest if cifically include the.ability of a,local land Other ,'states have come to he exercises any substantial discretion- official to disclose an interest and similar conclusionsso ary function in connection with a govern- , x . not vote on the matter. ment contract, purchase, payment, or An issue that is often raised in other. pecuniary transaction without this context is whether the govern- . Criminal code requirements having given seventy-two hours' actual ment actually obtained a benefit Several sections of the Colorado advance written notice to the secretary from the contract Even so, the courts criminafcodeaisoaffecttheobliga- of stateandtothegoverningbodyofihe and commentators tend toward the lions of elected and appointed mu- _ government which employs the public view that this does not affect the - nicipal officials. These sections are servant 'of the existence of a known determinatiotj and that the contract generally found . at section 18-8- pofential conflicting interest of the public . is still void In some cases, this will 301, et set entitled "Bribery and to wh ch hte is ebo t fo act inhh sfofficlal mean that the public entity will gain . ~ Corrupt Influences" and section ~ an unjustified benefit Such was - 18-8-401 et seq. entitled "Abuse of capacity. certain) true In the Berkle case (2) A potential conflicting interest" exists described above. One commentator Public Office." ~vvhen the public servant is a director, ' ~ A detailed discussion of these president, general manager, or similar has expressed the rule in this way: sections is beyond.the scope of this executive officer or owns or controls article: Municipal Officials should directly or indirectly a substantial inter Where the ordinance was passed only - Car~fUlly review these Sections In estinanynongovernmententitypartici- because of the vote of the interested { consultation with amunicipal attor- Paling in the transaction. member, it is everywherevoidGenerally ney t0 ensure Compliance with 811 (s) Failing to disclose a conflict of Inter- too, the mere tact that an interested applicable statutes. eat is a class 2 misdemeanor. member has voted will render the ordi- nance void, even though it is beneficial HB 1057 and 1209 do not make Is the local official excused from to the city , ey the majority view, the ~ any internal cross-references to the making the written disclosure to resolution or ordinance is void even ~ criminal code. Compliance with pro- the Secretary of State undersection though the vote ofthe interested official j visions of the municipal stafutes.~in 18-8-308(1) if the official abstains was not necessary to passage31 title 31 of the Colorado Revised -from voting or taking any other of• (continued on page 24) 1 F i Colorado Municipalities/WovemberDecember 1988 23 i I r,. • ~ ' c~~anf~ncts ®g anteYest ' - . interestingly,_HB 1209 appears o a pointed officers and employees in _ to take the minority view, 4ha4 the ~1llnlt`1= Colorado's municipalities can be - eontractisvoidabieratherthanvoid. ~a11tIgS ~®~p1;ad® - justifiably proud of this fact. Atsection24-17-203 HB 1209 pro- In 4he final analysis, the amoun4 Il~ave enacted c®des bides: ~ of time, attention, and energy spent ~t1i1~S ~1~1c~ flYi 3®~de evaluating 4he potential for acon- Voidablecontracts Everycontractmade C~aSeS ~l1Pe ~®ge Stfl'~l end flic4 and attempting to deal with it in violation of any of th® provisions of g prOpe~ly under the law befOfe 4he section 24-97-209 or 24-t7-202 shall ~eg111~eIIlellt~ Sep 'issue is discussed or voted upon be voidable at 4he instance of any party will always be substantially less . 4othecontractaxcepttheofficerinterest- ~®2't~tl ~n ~ ~2®9a than 4hat required 4o attempt to ®d therein. comply with the law after the discus- ethics which in some cases are sion has been held or the vote I?'i®rrtt retie rr9un(ctpaiitl~~ more stringen4 than requirements Oaken. D HB 1057 and HB 1209 apply, by se4 forth in HB 1209. Punicipal their terms, to ail municipalities in gfficials in home rule municipalities ~®®tn®tes 4he state of Colorado However, a are advised to consult with their ,well-established rule of law is that municipal attorney to determine statutory enactments by the Colo- whether a local charter orordinance '7g Cola 858, 2x7 P. 9056 (1926) . - eado General Assembly, while ap- provision establishes standards in alb, 2x7 P. at 1057 plying absolutely 4o all statutory addition 40, diffejent from, or more 'Id, 2a7 P. at lose cities and towns, applyto home rule stringent 4han those discussed in ss3 cola 182, 24 P2d 759 (1933) Ptlunicipali4ies only until those mu- this article. s~~. 24 P.2d at 760 - nit:Ipa11iI8S enact Charter Or OPdI- X705 P2d 5004 (Cola App 9985); cent Hance provisions on 4he same sub- .alone of 4he reported appellate denied 1985 ject.. decisions in Colorado concerning 92x•17.102(5), c.as Some home rule municipalities in conflicts of interes4 have involved ,oa-17'101, c.as. as-17.1 o2(a), Gas. Colorado have enacted codes of municipal officials. Elected and ap- ".2a-17.1oa(1>(a), c.RS. 'a2a-17-1oa(1)(b), c.as. 13aa-17-1oa(2), GR.S 1424-17-104(3), GRS. - ~~te~k96~~ ~®P ~~(`iBC~~ ~~~a~V@®i' 1e2a-17-109(2)(a),C.RS. . 18x4.17-109(2)(6), c,RS. 1724.17-109(3)(a), C.RS. the law of conflicts for municipal officials in Colorado, never 192x-17.1os(3)(b?. c.as. . t:rys4al clear, has. been both iirt roved and complicated by the ao24-17-los(e), Gaa p 24.17-104(1) and 24-97-109(1), GRS. General Assembly's adoption of HB 1057 and 1209. 1Mhile not by x'24.17-105(1), Gas "any means an exhaustive list, the following checklist is at Ieas4 a 232x-17-105(2)• Gas. starting poin4 for ensuring compliance with these two important new 242x-17-los(e), Gas. 24-17-105(3?, GR.S. laws: as2a-17-110, GRS . asid ~ Always disclose your interest. at the earliest stage. a'aa-17-201(1), GRS 1: iYiake oral disclosure to the governing body under31-4-404(2). 292x•17-201(1)(6), Gas. 2. Safer. RAake written disclosure under 18-8-308 as well. 18'8'301(3), GRS Delta Electric Const Ca, b Clty of San Antonio, 437 S.w.2d 602 (Tex CIv.App 1969); 13 ®On't bOte (OP take any OtQaeP SC410n). A4illbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of AAillbrad 69 Cal Rptr. 251 (Cal App 1968); C. ®on't influence others. Alewton v. Demos, 107 N.J. Super. 346, 258 1. Rllake sure disclosure precedes discussion on the matter. A,3d 376 (1969); Sun/orb Realty Corp v. Board of Education, 55 A.D. 2d 652, 390 FLY.S. 2d fl.eave the room. 155 (1976). 3. ®on't participate in discussion (a4 the time of the vote or earlier). ~1 Antieau, A9unicipal Corporation Lea, Sec a.oa. If you vote, do so only if: 1. Participation is necessary to achieve a quorum or otherwise enable 4he body 4o ac4 (31.4.404(2) and 24-17-109(3)(6)). 2. l~Iritteri disclosure is made prior to, not after, taking action: . a.'To the governing body under section 31-4-404(3) and 24-17• ~ _ . 201(1)(a)(1n, with the information as described a4 24-17-110. To the Secretary of State under section 98-8-308(1) (72 hours before action) and 24-17-110. Colorado NPunfcipalities/NovemberDecember 1988 ~ - ~ , ~ I Should an interested party be able to prove bias or prejudice on the part of a Councilmember, he may be able to overturn aquasi-judicial decision of the Town Council in a Court of law. In an extreme case, an interest parry who is deprived of procedural due process because of bias or prejudice on the part of a Councilmember at aquasi-judicial hearing may be able to collect substantial damages in a civil rights proceeding. ~ - i - i i j r i 4 . ~ _ I I i 1 it I I i I i ~ , r ~ O - l9dUo Tested Rigi~ts ®rdinanceo Attached is a Vested Right Ordinance setting forth how vested development rights are obtained in the Town of Vail. The state vested rights statute provides that a vested property right is deemed established upon approval o.r conditional approval of a site specific development plan following public notice and hearing..The vested right runs with the property and .gives the owner the right to undertake and complete any approved .development. The state statute defines a "site specific development plan" as "a plan which has been submitted to a local government by a land owner or its representative describing with reasonable certainty the type and intensity of use _ for a single parcel or parcels or property." . What constitutes a site specific development ,plan under the state statute which would trigger a vested property right is allowed by the statute to be determined by a municipal government. In the Town of Vail ordinance, a site_,specific development plan is limited to only major and minor subdivisions and Special Development District development . permits. 1t was the decision of the staff that neither design review nor the conditional use process is the type Of process which commits developers to expend large amounts of-money in reliance upon development approvals granted by the Town. The state statute itself specifies that variances, sketch plans, and preliminary plans are not site specific development plans. The vested property right which is created by the approval of a special development district or a rr?ajor or minor subdivision shall extend for a period of three years subsequent to its approval. The state statute provides that before a vested right .can be established, there ~ must be a public notice and hearing provided. This ordinance allows the hearing for the vesting of development rights to take place simulfaneously with tfie final hearing for subdivision approval or special dev_.elopment district approval. A fee is charged to the property owner for the actual cost of the required staff, time, and publication expenses, or, in the alternative, the staff may charge a set fee of $100. 16 Hame wda City &~,w and Racadvo 12nrea t ~ ,VIII. The Olpen Meetings Law. ~ _ Senate Bill 33 became effective on June 1, 1991. This Bill places local governments within the State Sunshine Law, Section 24-6-401. The current Sunshine l..aw is divided into two parts; one directed toward state levels of government, and the other directed- toward local levels of government. Article 6, Part 4 includes a legislative declaration that meeting procedures are a matter of statewide concern and home rule cities are included within the definition of covered entities. Section 24-6-402(2)(b) now provides: "All meetings of a quorum, or three or more members of any local public body, whichever is fewer, at which any public business is discussed, or at which any formal action may be taken are declared to be public meetings open to the public at all times." For the purposes of the statute, local public body means any board, committee, commission or other authority or advisory, policy making, rule making or formally constituted body of any political subdivision of the state and any public or private entity to which a public subdivision or an official thereof has delegated a governmental decision making function, but does not include persons on the administrative staff of the local public body. Meetings are defined .as any kind of gathering, convened to discuss public business in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Political subdivisions of the State include, but are not limited to, any county, city, ' .city and county, town, home rule city, home rule county, home rule city and county, school district, special district, local improvement district, special improvement district, or service district. `c This section provides that, change meetings or social gatherings at which discussion of public business is not the central purpose are excluded from the meetings required to be open to the public. Section 24-6-402(2)(c) provides: "Any meeting at which the adoption of any proposed policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation or formal action occurs, or at which a majority or quorum of the body is in attendance, or is expected to be in attendance, shall be held only after full and timely notice to the public. In addition to any other means of. fully and timely notice, a local public body may be deemed to have given a full and timely notice. if the notice of the meeting is posted in a designated public place within the boundaries of a local public body no less than 24 hours prior to the holding of the meeting. The public place or places.for posting of such notice shall be designated annually at the local public body's first regular meeting of each calendar year. The posting shall include specific agenda information where possible.° Notice of Town Council meetings are to be posted in the Town Hall at least 24 1 / Home F9Ae City aM Raoed~re 12/1193 Q[ ~ e ~ v hours prior to the meeting, if the Town Ha11 is designated at the Town's first meeting at the beginning of each calendar year. The statue provides that posting such notice is only one permissible means; any other method that provides "full and timely notice" may be used. Section 24-6-402(d)(II) requires that: "Minutes of any meeting of a local public body at which the adoption of any proposed .policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation or formal action occurs or could occur shall be taken and promptly recorded, and such record shall be open to public inspection. The minutes ofi a meeting during which an Executive Session authorized under Section IV of this Section is held shall reflect the general topic of the discussion at the Executive Session." Section 24-6-402(4) provides that an Executive Session may be called by a local public body upon a vote of two-thirds of a quorum present at the meeting. An Executive Session can be held only at a regular or special meeting and for the sole purpose of considering any of the matters listed in the statute. No final decision can occur at any Executive Session. The matters which the statute allows to be considered at any Executive Session are: (a) The purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer or sale of any real, personal or .other property interest except that no Executive Session shall be held for the purpose of concealing the fact that a member of the local public body has a personal interest in such purpose, purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer or sale. . (b) Conferences with an attorney for the local public body for the purposes of receiving legal advice, on specific legal questions. Mere presence , or participation of.an attorney.'at an Executive Session of the local public body is not sufficient to satisfy'the requirements of this Sub-Section (4). (c) .Matters required to be kept confidential by Federal or State law or rules and rggulations. (d) Specialized detail of security arrangements or investigations. (e) Determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations; developing strategies for negotiating; and instructing negotiators;' - (f) Personnel matters; except if the .employee who is the subject of the session has requested an open meeting or if the personnel matter involves more than orie employee all the employees have requested an open meeting. 1~ (g) Consideration of any documents protected by the mandatory non- disclosure provisions of the Open Records Act. Prior to the time the members of the public body convene at an Executive Session, the Chairman of the body shall announce the general topic of the Executive Session. As sanctions for the violation of the law, the statute provides that actions taken at a meeting which do not meet the law's requirements are not valid. _ i g ~ H~ ~a,. cnr e~~.~e ~ava,znre~ e a e p. ~kCo L~~d ,~~q~~sB41®~u P~®gr~art ~8®w ~h~~o 9 C:IHOIWEHULE.MEM 20 Meme was car lea end Reoedure 1zn,e3 . ~ , y, i LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM c~ Opperman & Associates, P.C. ~ ~ FLOW CHART: APPRAISAL I~ROCESS, NEGOTIATIONS AND ' CONDEMNATION PROCESS 1/2 SURVEYS: boundary, modified improvements {exterior fences, roads, easements, canals) 1/2 ~ 1/2 CLIENT: 1 /2 _ . , . determines - FUNDING ASSURANCES boundaires of TITLE DOCUMENTS: AND ESTIMATE OF project Copy of last warranty deed; COST OF ACQUISITO1rS determination of legal 1 / 2 ~ description and of interests to be acquired; negotiate price for 1 f2 ~ 1 /2 PUBLIC PURPOSE: title updates hl tial examination DETERMINATION OF COMPLETION: LEGALS of authority to ~ ~ TOTAL AFFECTED AND INTERESTS TO BE aequire and proceed 1 ~ 2 OUvNERSNIP ACQUIRED OttiTJERSHIP ItJFORMATION: Frorn client, appraisers, 1J2 1 / 2 ~ surveyor, owners; see assessor's records PLAT MAP 1 /2 Pass necessary prepared ~ pASS ORDINANCES. ordinances or showing resolutions 1 /2 project area RESOLUTIONS, APPROVALS OTHER COIJ5ULTING DATA: water, minerals, scenic easements or covenants, residential absorption data 1 /2 _ _ INFORMATION LETTER TO LANDOWNERS: ~ Identify project _ appraiser ~ RAGE 1: ORGANIZATION AND PREPARATION FOR VALUATION .j tIa tip ~ ~ - f ESTABLISH ORD IN APdCE TO ADOPT ` (End of legal and RELOCATIOPd ~ CITY'S RELOCATION ~ l ae-gsnizatianal •e PROCEDURE : limits and POLICY aotivities to autl~~orize , i guidelines, 24-56-9Ot r~locatian assistance) 9 /2 9 /2 LETTER OF ~ ATTORP9EY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPROVAL . 9 l2 . 9 / 2 HIGHEST AND t /2 1 / 2 _ r3EST USE; t /.g 9 / 2 APPRAISAL PROBABILITY DELIVERY OF t /2 _ REEXAMIfdE PROCESS OF REZONING; PRELIMINARY ~ APPRAISER FINAL ~ DETERP•11NE PROJECT COSY BEGINS STEMS OF DRAFT REVIEW APPRAISAL _ _ FAIR MARKET ' ESTIMATES, BENEFITS AND APPRAISALS REPORT VALUE '.OTHER CHANGES . ®AMAGE t /2 t ~r2 . 9 /2 GO'dEP.NMENT- LETTER OF s FIRST APPRAISER ADMINISTRATII~E APPROVAL FROM I MEETING: COFIPLIAPdCE ATTORPJEY t /2 Administrative, REVIEW regulatory ORDINANCE, ~ information; legal 1 ADMIN STRA TVE matters le al - 0 9 desoriptions and ACTION APPROVING interests 40 ~e FAIR MARKET aoquired VALUE OR 38-t-929 OFFERS I F~GE 2: APPRA~IS~4L PROCESS AP•da RELOC~ITIQ(~ POLIO I i 1f2 ADh11P•lISTRATIVE . COMPLIANCE ' LETTERS 24-~6-117 (federally aided project) t /2 1...............-,,.•Mi~a~urrr 1 ~ days; sugges# 3i1 days--------------- - 1 ORDUJANCE: 1 j2 t /2 t /2 _ Intent to acquire NOTICE 4F FINAL LETTER 1 !2 PP.O•JECT specifio I rO-AHEAD properties by INTENT TG NEGOTIATII~1 OF OFFER: DATE OF FINAL GECISIGr•! negotiations LANDOWNERS - with final date REJECTION OR and/or 38-1-121 of acceptance NEGOTIATIOP! oondemnation e~ ction 1 ~ ~ETTLEMErlTS Ar•!D CLOSIr•!GS ON ACCEPTEG OFFERS . ~ _ 1 i2 1 /2 EP•JD OF PROCESS FIRST LETTER OF FOR LkhlDOW1•lERS OFFER TD ACCEPT IhJG . - LANDO1tiTJERS NEGOTLATED OFFERS FADE 3: NEGOTIATIONS tirdlTH LANDf~~~rNEP•5 n 9 I2 - SUE}MISSIQPd CAST pA~rMEPdT OF a ° OF SILL OF HEARIPdG COSTS ° COSTS 9 !2 a c asE CLOSED 9/2 9IZ ' P.ECORD RULE D ISTR IBUT IOP~d AND ORDER ~ HEAF,ING WITH COUPdTY BETWEEPd i RESPONDENT I c 9 I2 9 I2 9 /2 ~ . ENTRY OF I: APPROVAL PAYMENT OF JUDGMENT OF JUDGMENT AND .JUDGMENT ENTRY OF RULE - AND ORDER 9 I2 . AFF IRP1ED CLOSE6 9 I2 1 /2 I _ AFFIRMED CEP.TIGRARI ~ 9 I2 _ 9 /2 REVERSED ~c RETRIAL 9 /2 9 F.EMANDED NOTICE OF APPEAL APPEAL PROCEDURE ~I2 ' 9 /2 REVERSED 8c RE~~IANDED - RETRIAL F~+GE 5: TR1~4L AN® COP~CLUSIOP~d o A . ~ < r 9 /a 1 /a _ t /a • 1 I2 S1 ART SERVICE ~ OBTA Ifd FUBL ISH 9 OF PROCESS PUBLICATION ORDER ~ ~I ADDITIOPdAI 9 /a ORDER OWFdERSIiIP IPdFORNIAT ION : f~OT IFY F?ossessions; EXPERTS OF 1~I2 9 /2~ vnreoord~d IIr1MEDIATE _ documents; POSSESSIOPd SERVIGE II~1-STATE DATE OF LAST negotiator°s log DATE APdD SERVICE SERVICE • ~ OUT-OF-STATE e 9/2 9/2 . 9 !~a DIRECT FILE LEGAL ATTORP•dEY ORDIPdAP+IGE TO ACTIOIfd IFd TO CONDEP~fd IF COURT WITH g /a PREPARE NOT ALREADY I9~IMEDIATE SU1T PASSED i f'OSSESS10Fd Ii~1MEDIATE DATE POSSESSIOfd IiEARIhdO 9 /2 ~ FILE'hdOTICE i /a ' i 9 / 2 OF L IS APPRAISAL UPDATE APdD PEFIGEFdS TITLE COMMITMENT UPDATE TITLE WITH COUPdTY UPDATE TO IMMEDIATE ~ COMP'I ITMENTS POSSESS ION D ATE f PAGE PP.EPARATION FOR APED 1P~IITIATIOP~~1 OF LEGAL ACTION I I ' ~ 1I2 FILE TP.IAL DATA CERTIFICATE CRCP 121 1 /2 ESTABLISH DATE ~ 1 ~2 1ti~2 OF VALUE ~ RETAIP•J OTHER FItJAL LETTER OF EXPERTS OFFER 38-I-121(6) IF FJOT PRE'JIOUSLY SEhlT 1 12 - - 1 ~ 2 FUNDS IMh1EDIATE WITHDRA1n'AL 1 /2 - POSSESSION DECISION BY PREPARATIOhJ FOR 1 !2 - 1 URGER SIGFJED AND COFJDEMNOR: TRIAL: Discovery, VOIR DIRE OF TRIAL fUt•JDS DEPOSITED percent of negatiatians COhiMISSIOf•J deposit, other issues 1!2 1 /2 t°10TIOtJ FOR i j2 ~ PREPARATIOf•J APPROVAL OF FUhIDS OF EY,HIBITS COh1h11SSI0f•JERS IF REQUESTED BY DEPOSITED RESPOt•JDENT M ~ ` n PAGE 5: PREPARATION FOR TRIAL s ~s ~a•7-q3 ~ 6 ~ , - - - --1993 ~'lanning aad Environmental Comrnis~ion Actions .)au Feb filar Apr DIay Jun .ful Auk Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals I - 200 Setback Variances 5 1 2 4 2 5 I I 2 1 0 0 ~4 :r. Other Variances 1' 3 1 5 5 0~ 3 1 3 3 1 0 ~ _6 180- ~ Conditional Use Permits 1 5 I 3 5 I~ 1 0 l I 0 1 0 19 Exterior Alterations I O 0 l 1 0 2 3 0 0+ 1 1 0 9 SDDs (New) I 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1~ 1 0 0 g 160 v ~ SDD (Major Amendment) 0 1 0 0 1 l 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 SDD (Minor Anendment) 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 ( 0 0 l 0 6 140 Rczonings I O 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 1 0 4 Major Subdivisions I O 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } l20 Minor Subdivisions ~ 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 l 0 15 _ `~ys. , Worksessions 4 5 0 5 3 5~ 4 4 3 2 1 0 36 s~• ~`'V" z 100 'k~ t Appeals of Staff Decisions ~ 0 O f O I 2 I O I O 0 0~ 0 0 0 3 > ~ , 3 4 I 7 I 0 9 I 17' 8 15 18' I I - 18T, 18A Tabled Items 5 6 0 72 _ ' Withdrawn Items I I~ O~ l, 0' 3 I 0, 2+ 0 0~ 0 0 0 7 80 lb4 .159 I I { Other Actions" 12~ 1~ O I 1 5~ 8 I S I 2' 1 2 I 3~ O I 30 ~ 4 Totals 19 23 13 26 37 27 33 30 128 21 ~ Ifi I 0 ~ 2G3 60 '1ncludesZmnug rude l,hauges, etc. - - - - _ _ = ' GxteriorAlterations Mnrch - I-till $uilding 90 ' g9 „ * r April -American Ski Exchange 40: ~ ~ " ' r. June - Lionshead Center & L'Ostello ~ July - Noursc Residence , ~ ~ 3 , ~ ~ r Jaly - L'Ostcllo y Octolxr - Gulden Peak IIouse 20 , ' ~ July -Gondola Building ti•> ` November - Gotthclf s New SDDs 0 ~ ~ January -The Valley, Phase II ~ i February -The Valley, Phase l[ 1988 `,1489 ~ 199U 1991 1992 1993. April -The Valley Phase II, The Valley, Phase II YEAR July - -Ihe Valley September - Vail Atliletic Club Octutxr - Goldgn Pcak I-louse w SDD Major Amendments - - - - February -Cascade Vitlage * noes not include taUlcd or ~ti~it4ldr~t`vn items. May, Junc July - Simha Run • (DRB93 . Y,LW] A 1993 Dcsr ;n ~eviewr hoard / st:~ceA~t~o~>,s ' ~ ' r. ,Tun Pcb Mai Apr play Jun ,lul Aug Scp Oct Nov Dec I Tcudv / / - 250 Requests 1 1 0 2 3 1 1 2 0 I I 0 I't ~ l,00 / Ncw Signagc 3 2 3 3 1 2 0 4 4 G J 0 37 I / Sign Variances 1 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 Satellite Dishes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I SOp New Commercial and Additions 0 0 3 8 7 3 2 4 1 3 0 0 31 I+ Ncty Homes 4 1 7 G 8 J 8 3 5 1 0 0 S2 ~ I 329 3~Z Residential Additions+ 1 1 7 4 0 7 4 2 G 3 I 0 3G ~ ,100. 326 SeparationsoCUnits 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 I O 0 0 0 1 Site Development Improvements 2 0 0 3 3 2 2 G 2 S 2 0 27 Secondary Unit Requests++ 0 0 0 2 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ 31 7 Changcsto Approved Plan 0 0 S 2 1 I 3 5 1 2 1 0 2l I )00 \ Conce foal Ravicws 4 4 8 7 5 S G 2 0 1 2 0 •14 ~ V~ V~ P ~ ~ A~ A ~~~\t \ r~~~ Tahled Items S 11 12 R 1 l 14 7 9 12 16 12 0 117 ~ 267 ~ 200 - \ lVitluirawn Items 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 S ~ StalFApprovals+"* 10 G 7 15 30 24 23 36 24 47 32 0 254 172 R \ ~ Avwio,.~ \V~\\~ ...y y,. ~281~v ~ ' Denials 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 239 ~ ~ 254 ~A\\\~~\ . \ ~ w 100 ~ \ i ~\\\\\`k\\\~\ ~ o Tntnls 31 2G 52 G1 7l G8 I 58 73 39 8G G1 0 G4G ~ \ \ ~ o- \:~~\152 \ ~ ~ v~~~ A vvA \V ,~v~ ~A\ wvwvv, w X83 a ~ X97 ~ * MOIVIICUX CUIOf Change ~A~AV~~<v~ t~~V~~y~.'~\~~ ~A p~~ AAVAA']V ~ t VA~VO A ' Does not include additions which used the 250 Orc]inance ~ , ~ : ~ t ~HB~ ~ K9 ~ 90 9l ~ ~ 92'~. v; Fk On lots less than 15,000 sq. It. , l t::~u M Stafrapprovals include items which have minimal impact and do not alter the intent of the project, and signs of Icss than 5 square feet. f~ Staff Approvals Board Actions N„+~;La'+`C ~t~::Y"-" 7 N., ~ if" , ~st-,rti-8`,gx~ n.~e,,:,t ,z t~i..~~~!.;tr r,~_ Page 1 , . i . ''k!. L~~~V Y Y\JUV V~./~JU~I U ~UV~ 1991 1992 1993 January 164. January 154 January 224 February 150 February 122 February 159 March 90 March 71 March 127 April 154 April 104 April i i 8 May 263 May 233 May 198 June 287 June 239 June 314 July 301 July 339 July 293 August 298 August, 276 August 325 September 278 September 305 September 429 October 405 October 417 October 477 November 343 November 349 November 443 December 300 December 312 a YEAR OF 1992 # OF DU'S # OF BP'S VALUATION JANUARY 0 18 $ 91,000.00 FEBRI.~ARY 0 24 $ 236,000.00 MARCH 1 26 $ 2,908,638.00 APRIL 1 64 $17,695,000.00 MAY 11 67 $ 6,425,000.00 JUNE 19 59 $ 5,875,000.00 JULY 6 58 $ 2,731,000.00 AUGUST ~ 17 59 $ 3,414,000.00 SEPTEMBER 8 79 $ 3,453,000.00 OCTOBER 1 60 $ 823,000.00 . NOVEMBER 0 41 $ 795,000.00 DECEMBER 2 32 $ 843,000.00 TOTAL 66 587 $41,836,638.00 YEAR OF 1993 # OF DU'S # OF BP'S VALUATION JANUARY 0 16 $ 126.,000.00 FEBRUARY 1 25 $ 267,000.00 MARCH 1 21. $ 1,045,000.00 APRIL 5 69 $ 2,543,000.00 MAY 12 69 $ 3,429,400.00 JUNE 40 84 $17,715,000.00 JULY 8 55 $ 2,259,000.00 AUGUST 7 74 $ 3,461,800.00 SEPTEMBER 29 93 $ 9,472,500.00 OCTOBER 5 86 $ 4,566,000.00 NOVEMBER 2 58 $ 1,441,300.00 TOTAL Y-T-D 110 650 $46,326,000.00 NEW DWELLING UNITS WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL YEAR OF 1990 # OF DU'S ~ # OF BP'S VALUATION JANUARY 0 17 $ 95,000.00 " FEBRUARY 0 7 $ 7,000.00 MARCH 0 12 $ 4,376,000.00 APRIL 0 55 $ 8,460,000.00 MAY 0 51 $ 2,492,900.00 JUNE 0 52 $ 5,370,500.00 JULY 0 35 $ 3,202,500.00 AUGUST 0 51 _ $ 3,475,930.00 SEPTEMBER 0 69 $ 6,163,766.00 OCTOBER 0 48 $ 2,281,410.00 NOVEMBER 0 27 $ 608,999.00 DECEMBER 0 20 $ 488,021.00 TOTAL 62 444 $37,022,526.00 YEAR OF 1991 # OF DU'S # OF BP'S VALUATION JANUARY 0 17 $ 333,750.00 FEBRUARY 0 8 $ 138,040.00 MARCH 1 17 $ 333,750.00 APRIL 9 56 . $ 4,018,770.00 MAY 4 51 $ 2,041,509.00 JUNE 13 59 $ 4,489,550.00 JULY 13 46 $ 2, 910,133.00 AUGUST 3 49 $ 2,109.800.00 SEPTEMBER 13 54 $ 3,042,500.00 OCTOBER 3 75 ~ $ 1,265,250.00 NOVEMBER 2 61 $ 1,143,500.00 DECEMBER ~ 0 39 $ 164,000.00 TOTAL 61 532 $21,990,552.00 .s r IYIEtUI®I1h11~ADUIVI TO: Vail Town Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: September 30, 1993 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Recommendation On Work Program Far 1994 Long Range Planning Efforts I. INTRO®UCTION This memo is written in order to provide the Vail To~vn Council with the staff's recommendation on how to spend the long range planning dollars ($180,000.00} in the 1994 Capital Improvement Program budget. We have four major long range planning efforts which the Community Development Department would like to complete within the next trrvo to two and one-half years. These include: Approximate Completion Budget Project Time Required Year Approximate Cost A: Updating of the Land 1 year 1994 $130,000 to $180,000 Use Plan B. West Vail Master Plan 6 to 9 months 1995 $100,000 C. Lionshead Master Pian 6 to 9 months 1995 $60,000 to $80,000 D. Revisions to current 1 year 1995 or $60,000 Design Review Guidelines 1996 Please note that attached to this cover memo are more detailed descriptions of the efforts involved with each of these planning projects. 11. STAFF RECO~AIMEP~DATION The Community Development Department believes that fhe updating of the Land Use Plan is the most critical and important project for the community. Our goal would be to complete the updated Land Use Plan within one year. In order to complete the project in this time, consultant assistance will be needed and approximately two planners will need to commit their long range planning time to the project. In addition to the Land Use Pian, we have many other projects which are currently ongoing or in the implementation stage. These plans are as follows (not listed in order of priority): A. Revisions to~the Agricultural Open Space zone district and Greenbelt Natural Open Space zone district. Completion: Fall, 1994. 1 - B. Addition of two to four new view corridors. Completion: Spring, 1994. C. Housing Authority -ongoing. D. Art in Public Places -ongoing. E. Zoning Code revisions effort -ongoing. F. Possible Cemetery Master Plan implementation, 1994. G. Environmental Strategic Plan implementation -ongoing. H. Open Lands Plan implementation -ongoing. I. Air and Water C~uality Improvement Programs -ongoing. J. Land Ownership Adjustment Plan implementation -ongoing. K. Tree Ordinance. Completion: Spring, 1994. L. Staff also assumes that there will be two to four additional long range projects that come up in 1994 which are not anticipated. Examples of these types of projects include (neon, lighting, Land Ownership Adjustment, etc.). We believe it is in the best interests of the community to address the update of the Land Use Plan first and then tackle the other three major planning projects. Our thinking is based on the fact that the Land Use Plan has many implications for the direction of the community. It is our opinion that there are many different views as to haw the community should develop and what is in the best interests of the community when looking at growth issues. The Land Use Plan process provides an opportunity for the constructive airing of different viewpoints, presentation of objective information, identifying the factors which are effecting growth in our community, and an opportunity to bring the community together by agreeing on a vision for the community. The "vision thing" has been discussed for several years and has become the critical issue for Vail. By addressing this plan first, the other planning efforts (West Vail Master Plan, Lionshead Plan, Update of the Design Review Guidelines, and other projects which may come up) will be able to be addressed within an overall planning framework which citizens, elected officials, appointed board members, and staff can use to insure that we are operating in concert with community wishes. This is certainly not to say that by updating the Land Use Plan we will avoid all future conflict. However, this planning effort has great potential to allow the community to clarify its vision for the future. It is also important that our department finish some of the projects which were initiated in 1993 and allow some time for implementing plans which the community has spent a great deal of time working with our staff on. We believe a balance must be struck between initiating new plans and implementing the good ideas we receive from the community in our recently approved plans. 2 _ With respect to staffing, we believe that with consultant assistance on the Land Use Plan, we will be able to complete the work load as defined above. If one or mare additional long range planning projects are added to our work program for 1994, we believe that it would be necessary to address the staffing issue. The current planning load has been very great for 1993. In addition, at this time we are one planner short. Although we intend to fill the position by the end of November, staffing issues must be considered when addressing the work program. We understand that all of the four long range planning projects are very important to the community. It is clear to us that there is great interest in looking at the 'JVest Vail Master Plan and proceeding with this project at a very fast pace. Our concern is that so many of the issues related to the West Vail Master Plan really need to be decided through the Land Use Plan update. For example, will the Town proceed with the I-70 lid? If it is decided to proceed with this project, how does the lid concept effect transportation in West Vaii and overall land use throughout the community? Without an understanding of t4'ie socioeconomic changes in our community, and without community consensus on a vision, we believe that the master planning for the West Vail area will become much more controversial and complicated. sy completing the Land Use Plan first, it is fe{t that. the context for' many other growth questions will be created. In 1995, the West Vail Master Plan, Lionshead Master Plan, and Design Review Guidelines could be addressed all at the same time assuming that the staffing level remains consistent. 3 .7 I~ D, 1 ' ISSUE: IPPDATE OF LAN® USE PLAN i. SAC4CGi~Otl6~!® In November of 1986, the Town of Vail Land Use Pian was given final approval. Staff believes that it is necessary to update this plan in 1994. The plan addresses growth in general and is a key planning document for the community. This document is intended to serve as a basis from which future decisions are made regarding land use within Vail. The primary focus of the Land Use Plan is to address the long-term needs and desires of the Town as it matures. Our Land Use Plan should be updated every three to five years. As the plan was approved in 1986, it is very important to update this key document so that it is current with many of the factors that have influenced our community since 1986. As stated in the Master Plan, "the Town is naw faced with the challenge of creatively accommodating the projected growth, while preserving the important qualities which have made Vail successful in the past - as a ski resort, as a permanent place to live, and as growing year round resort". il. PLAN~ltNG Pd~OCESS P.. Staff would like to use a similar process used in the 1986 effort. As stated in the plan, the process would be a dynamic one with citizen participation playing an important role. The process would involve: ~A systematic inventory of the physical properties of the Town, including the land conditions and the statistical components of the socioeconomic base. The socioeconomic analysis would evaluate factors such as population changes, retail space, office space, housing units, impacts from the existing use of Vail Mountain and impacts from expanded skiing terrain on Vail Mountain. ~A thorough analysis of the inventory to determine the long-term implications of the data. ~An interactive public participation process to solicit goals, desires, needs of the citizen, business and political communities within the Town. A community survey would be included. ~A creative synthesis of the public input combined with the development opportunities and constraints, into a realistic and achievable land use plan for the Town that provides a community vision would be the end product. in summary, the effort would include an analysis of the goals and policies that currently exist in the plan, an update of our forecasting model, and a review and revision of the Land Use Plan map if necessary. B. Questions to answer through this process. Below, are examples of some of the questions which. the Land Use Plan update wil! be addressing. z 1. What are the various existing philosophies, issues and problems which have shaped growth in the past and will continue to influence the future? 2 2. What are the major constraints to growth particularly in respect to infrastructure and the environment? 3. What are the market demands for gro~vth and how should these be directed by public policy decisions? 4. What type of growth is necessary and desirable for the economic well being of the Town? 5. How should environmental quality of life concerns play a role in directing growth? 6. Where is there room for growth, where do growth pressures exist versus where growth should optimally occur? 7. What types of general administrative changes are necessary to address the issues of growth (i.e. land use regulation revisions, SDDs, Hillside Residential zoning, Residential Cluster zoning, zoning changes, etc.)? 8. How will the projected growth on Vail Mountain effect our community? 9. What growth rate is appropriate? 10. Should the community pursue the I-70 lid? If the. answer is yes, there will be a new corridor of land which would need to be addressed in the Land Use Plan. Infrastructure implications, environmental issues, etc. would all need to be addressed through the planning process. 11. Should annexations play a role in the future of Vail's growth? 3 111. STAFF RECOIl~a14oEN~ATION . Staff would recommend that the Council proceed with the update of the Land Use Pian in 1994. The cost far the project would range from $130,000 to $180,000. We believe that it would be possible to create asub-area within the Land Use Plan that would address the West Vail commercial area in respect to land use. However, we think that it is critical that the community look at the overall factors which are effecting growth throughout the Town before focusing on the West Vail commercial Area. 4 . WEST VAIL REDEVELOP~IIEIVT I. BACKGgOUND • On Tuesday May 25, 1993, the Town was approached by Jim Loftus, a developer from Boulder. Mr. Loftus presented plans for the development of the Nud Wirth parcel recently purchased by the Town of Vail. The plans showed high density development on the parcel which included a 55,000 square foot grocery store, employee housing, and a fire station. After the meeting, Town Council and staff agreed that it might be worthwhile to pursue redevelopment of much or all of the West Vail commercial area. The time appears ripe for real progress, due to the Town's ownership of the largest vacant parcel and Safeway's desire for a new or larger store. Jim Loftus called recently to pass on news of Safeway's interest of vrorking with the Town. Safeway's corporate office is now working on a new analysis of the Vail Market, a scenario wherein Safeway swaps its parcel for the Town's, and a project similar to Jim Loftus' proposal is built. On September 14, 1993, Jim Loftus and Katie Presse from Safeway met with the Town Council at a worksession to discuss how they would approach the project. Mr. Loftus has also met with the Vail Housing Authority. The Housing Authority agreed to provide a letter of support for using the Vail Commons site as an affordable housing site. On September 28, 1993, Leo Palmer met with members of Town staff and Town Council to discuss his interest in the Vail Commons parcel. His concept is similar to the Loftus idea in that a grocery store, affordable housing, a fire station, and some open space would be located on the site. Steve Barwick contacted Hud Wirth to discuss Hud's plan for the Vail das Schone property. Hud replied that he is currently planning tc keep the property long term but he is open to participating with the Town for redevelopment of the area. The ownership make up of the Vail das Schone Condominium Association is as follows: Hud Wirth Commercial Interests: 52% Twenty Large Condominiums at 2% each: 40% Eight Small Condominiums at 1% each: 8% 100% In addition, the owners of the V1,~est Vail Mall are also interested in improving their project. They have hired an architect to begin preliminary work on design alternatives for their site. ~ 5 tl. GEd~ERAL d~LA~d~dd~d(a AE~® ~Ol~d~dG dB~PORfitdATfC1N . Attached to this memo is a summary of general zoning information related to the Hud Wirth parcel as we!I as other properties in the general vicinity. The Land Use Plan designations that apply to parcels in this area include: CC Community Commercial This area is designed to meet consumer demands from community residents. Primary uses would include supermarkets, dry cleaning establishments, hardware stores, service stations, financial institutions and medical offices. The design of these facilities would be oriented toward vehicular access and parking. LDR Low Density Residential This category includes single-family detached homes and two family dwelling units. Density of development vrithin this category would typically not exceed 3 structures per buildable acre. Also within this area would be private recreation facilities such as tennis courts, swvimming pools and club houses for the use of residents of the area. Institutional/public uses permitted would include churches, fire stations, and parks and open space related facilities. MDR Medium Density Residential The medium density residential category includes housing which would typically be designed as attached units with common walls. Densities in this category would range from 3 to 14 dwelling units per buildable acre. Additional types of uses in this category would include private recreation facilities, private parking facilities and institutional/public uses such as churches, fire stations and parks and open space facilities. P Parks Included in this category are town owned parcels intended for both active recreation activities such as athletic fields, golf courses and playgrounds, as well as areas for . various passive recreation activities. Per the zoning chart, most of the parcels are zoned Commercial Core III, which allows retail, office, public facilities as well as employee housing. The two gas station sites are zoned Heavy Service District. The West Vail Inn was designated as a Special Development District. Please note that this SDD has not been constructed. There are three parcels zoned for primary/secondary development that may also be appropriate to include in the master plan area. 6 The option to !ook at a redevelopment plan far all of these parcels could provide an opportunity to address many of the transportation concerns in the area, community facility and service needs, and open space, as rrrell as pedestrian connections to the adjacent neighborhoods. Iii. ST,4FF REC®i4~t~E~lD,4TiQBV Staff wouid suggest that a redevelopment master plan be created for the area. The focus of the master plan would be to look at the Land Use Plan goats and how they would translate into development for the 'J`Jest Vail Mall area as well as design issues: The plan ~vould look at design character, landscaping, open space, transportation/circulation and pedestrian access. The project area should include the properties along the North Frontage Road East to Buffehr Creek Road. This Master Plan information would then be gi~~en to the development teams that are interested in working on the Vail Commons project. In its case, the Town is not directly in the land development business. The Town ~vou!d be assisting the economic development process and providing guidance to the developers in respect to community land use objectives and design guidelines. 7 WEST V~++9L GE9~ERAL AREA JULY 1, X993 .Site Acreaae* Zoning Land Use Plan ®esignatien V~lendy's 1.247 acres CC111 Medium Density Residential Texaco .05 acre Heavy Service Community Commercial Phillips 66 .05 acre Heavy Service Community Commercia! Tract D, Hud Wirth 3.609 acres Primary/Secondary Medium Density Residential West Vail Inn/ 4.4 acres SDD Community Commercial Chamonix Corner West Vail Ma11 3.25 acres CCIII Community Commercial Safeway 3.30 acres CCII! Community Commercial Vail dos Schone 2.86 acres CCI!! Community Commercial Vail Commons (Hud Wirth) 6.6 acres CCIII Community Commercial Brandess Building 1.67 acres CClll Community Commercial Buffer Creek Park 0.8 acres Agriculture/~Jpen Space Park Buffer Creek, Lot 34 15,555 square feet Primary/Secondary Low Density Residential Buffer Creek, Lot 35 15,555 square feet Primary/Secondary Low Density Residential * approximate size 8 LEONS6~EAD it~AST~R PLAN t. ~AC4C~t3t~t~E~® This project has been listed as a goal of the community and Town Council for several years. The plan would address the fallowing issues: A. Develop design and signage guidelines specific to the desired character of Lionshead. B. V1~ork with Vail Associates to incorporate important view corridors into their planning for redevelopment of the Gondola/Sunbird site. C. Address snow removal procedures in the iNali. These concepts would be consolidated into a cohesive master plan far Lionshead which would be developed through a process in which Lionshead tenants and property ovrners are participants as well as other community members. tl. STAt=P F~ECOEIIit'~~N®ATEO~ Staff recommends that this project be completed in 1995. It would be a six to nine month effort. 9 UPDATED DEStGBV F~EVEEW GUtDELItdES L @AC@{GROUI~D The intent of this project would be to make our Design RevieGV Guidelines more "user friendly". VVe would like to clarify wording in the Guidelines and also add sketches and graphics to explain many of the design concepts. We also believe a special section on "building on steep slopes" would be helpful to the community. II. STAPF RECO611f64~Ei~DATION The staff would suggest that this project be completed in 1995 or early in 1996. VVe estimate that it will take approximately one year to complete this work at a cost of approximately $60,000.00. 10 . ~ ~ ld~n~4~ ~ ~ U~ December 3, 1993 TO: Town of Vail Council Members cc: WMB Beaver Creek Resort Compa/riy Board of Directors Vail Associates, Inc. Town of Avon Council Members FR: Vail Valley Marketing Board, Tom Britz, Chairman ~Eo SEC®M~AEN®~TD®~ The Vail Valley Marketing Board (WMB) recently received a proposal from the Beaver Creek Resort Company for first-time participation in the WMB cooperative marketing efforts. The proposal from BCRC was not exactly what the WMB had requested. After review and considerable discussion, the consensus was that this could ultimately result in a broader, valley-wide cooperative effort, with a fair share methodology jointly agreed upon by the contributing partners within a set time frame. Because of the time required to reach this point of cooperation, the WMB has been placed in a position of being at least two months behind in its planning process. V1/e request swift adoption of our recommendation in the respective interests of the valley-wide business community. The recommendation by the WMB: 1. That this Agreement be for a minimum duration of three years, in order to allow the WMB to focus on its mission of marketing the Vail Valley, as opposed to fundraising. 2. Between now and July 1, 1994, representatives of the four major contributing entities must agree on a method or formula to annually determine °fair share° contribution, with an °escalator° clause which will allow for changes in the level of respective funding depending on the economic activity experienced by the respective contributor. That this recommendation remain °as is° for 1994 only, and that the fair share formula become effective for funding for the calendar year 1995 and 1996. That in the event that the respective contributors are unable to find consensus with regard to the method or formula to annually determine the fair share contribution by July 1, 1994, the Town of Vail should take whatever action it deems necessary to protect its interest in funding community summer marketing - beginning with the 1995 calendar year. 3. That the WMB Board seats in 1995 are reallocated to reflect any substantive changes that might occur when the °fair share° formula kicks in. 4. That the VVMB Board seats for 1994 be adjusted to reflect the pro-rata contribution of the respective contributing entities, assuming all four entitites listed in fact, do participate in the cooperative funding. Specific to this recommendation is that the.Town of Vail's contribution level for 1994 only, remain at its existing level, in order to foster °fair share° valley-wide contribution by all entities for 1995 and beyond; that this will demonstrate good faith towards this valley-wide effort on behalf of the Town of Vail. The requested funding and the adjusted WiV16 seats.for 1994 would be as follows: Town of Vail (same level) S 160,500 + BLF 4 seats Beaver Creek Resort Company S 100,000 1 seat Vail Associates, Inc. 550,000 1 seat Town of Avon $90.000 1 seat 5. That the WMB continue running its affairs as the status quo appointed Board it has been, with the Board members appointed by the respective contributors. An Advisory Committee made up of elected representatives from the contributors is acceptable, and recommended, particularly to determine future cooperative funding. 6. That the °Call to Action° phone number listed in the WIVIB's advertising shall be adjusted to reflect a °fair° percentage listing the Vail/Beaver Creek Central Reservations (VBCCR) phone number, respecting the concerns of the Beaver Creek Resort Company, and its contractual call-to-action relationship with VBCCR. . - w a - - ..1.... i c :.r January 675,186 696,752 742,262 981,304 890,5851,063,1961,_126,496 1,465,870 1,599,123 1,713,091 1,709,654 1,772,8301,851,853 79,023 8.32% __=_4,46% February 687,792 751,856 824,650 918,154 946,5521,135,7861,205,101 1,561,286 1,695,850 1,737,343 1,780,568 1,847,0001,825,255 (21,745) 2_51% _ -1.18% March _ 853,648 977,828 1,084,814 1,187,520 1,31b,652 1,378,782 1,591,705 1,939,758 1,897,718 2,051,820 1,977,995 2,051,100 1,984,588 = (66,5121 0.33%_ -3.24% April 355,300 319,546 481,204 531,668 430,877 425,961 550.205 567,684 634,174 616,648 691,163 717,000 860,792 143,792 24.54% 20.05% MaY 147,378_156,588 166,200 162,912 244,987 245,518 170,567 215;548 ~ 236,359 _250.809 268,000 278,000 253,737 (24,2631 -5.32% -8.73% June 247,326 257,744 262,696 x280,828 361,627_ 331,581_329,039 393,470 _448,227 468,948_ 468,598 487,0 471,650 (15,3501 0.65% _3.15% July 349,116 407,474 406,462 447,815 479,507 479,201 559,683 649,139 665,094 737,288 742,750 771,000 807,261 36,261 8.69% 4,70% August_ 348,756 384,338 402,792 386,985 512,513 536,904 575,887 668,1i9 678,071 761,992 767,257 795,500 822,257 26,757 7.17% 3.36% September 268,598 324,670 384,864 340,102 374,060 442,402 422,502 469,032 482.328 491,684 485,954 504,000 556,295 52,295 14.47% 10.38% October 223,830 198,614 206,248 209,282 237,504. 273,951 291,204 335,740 364,002 324,802 367.,578 380000 395.088 15,088 74896 397% ::Yr+• :.,,,:;r ........r.. TOTAL 4,156.930 4,475,410 4,962.192 5.346.570 5,794 A64 6,313.?A? 6.822,389 8,265,646 8,700,94f~ 9,154 4?5 9,259,517 9,603,43n 9,828,776 225,346 6.15% 2.35% November 245,894 281,704 310,588 229,083 376,657 386,270 376,235 430,820 439,731 428,086 497,907 514,420 _ 1,245,612 1,455,948 1,615,278 1 625,219 1 691,775 .1,846,223 1 899 630 December 737,506 853,100 906,758 905.955 1,167 SAO ...:ice., :::::::v::v::::::.:~: x;; r. niiii:ti.; :.::n pi: 4.~iii:tvi iii: ii: ii:4i:i•iiii::::biii:Jiiii:•i:~~r'+,:i!•iiiii:•iiiiiiiii: iiiiiii: iiiii i i.2i iii iii .v.J::::i:::ii'i'*.;.;:tin}::!!:;{~>iii:•'.•;{::::ij v: Totcl 5,140,3305,610,214 6,179,538 6,481,608 7,338,801 7,945,164 8,654,572 10,311,744 10,764,896 11,274,286 11,603,647 12,017,480 _ TOWRI OF BAIL ~ 9994 BUDGET SUPAAAARY OF REVERIUE AWD EXPERIDITURES AR1D CHAiVGES IW FUWD BALARICE Fund Estimated Estimated Transfers Roliforward Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Transfers Revenue Budgeted Balance Revenue Expenditures In/Out Expenditures Fund Balance Revenue Expenditures In!(Out) Over/(Under) Fund Balance FUND 1/1/93 1993 1993 1993 To 1994 1993 1994 1994 1994 Expendkures 1994 General Fund 3,479,708 14,954,688 14,770,936 (885,696) "'2777 764` 14,075,594 14,124,686 56,321 7,229 2c784 993i;. ~necial Revenue Funds; ' Capital Projects Fund 2,607,319 7,386,773 5,466,160 (1,950,542) 1,543,095 9034295:; 6,921,122 4,024,654 (2,854,940) (58,472) . _ 975 8?,3`; Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 3,162,058 2,196,777 2,785,426 479,763 20$3646:; 1,538,250 2,528,525 (990,275) 1 c'103 371:: Special Parking Assessment 2,231 306,050 (308,281) O;i:Closed PoliceCor>4iscationFund 458,485 26,000 158,000 16,984.:.__;,;,.;.,309,50{; 22,000 236,535 (214,535):;::.;;_..;; ;:94,x# Vail AAarketing Fund (10,079) 709,769 721,000 :;.,::(21,;310): 639,500 609,501 29,999 8,9.89.:: Vail Housing Fund 33,000 836,598 869`598.; 35,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 <904 598 Lionshead RAall Project Fund 778 (778) ;O;Closed , . ` ~ n ~ Bond Proceeds Construction Fund 5,697,476 67,749 3,125,009 (2,632,957) 7 259'. 40,000 40,000 47,259 m F, lntemal Se?viee Funds; Heavy Equipment Fund 339,136 1,535,864 1,447,502 ;;:,.427;498:: 1,582,910 1,523,391 59,519 487,Q77:: HeaRh Insurance Fund 486,194 917,983 741,247 662;930; 1,002,989 942,860 60,121 773:059 Enterprise Fund; Parking Structure Enterprise Fund (86,321) 0 0 . 2,033,766 1,947,445 J~ebt Service Fundg; Town o9 Vail Debt Service Fund 1,854,881 183,588 5,065,468 4,891,780 1864 781'' 174,678 3,129,618 2,954,940 0 9;864,789" West Vail Debt Service Fund 5,337 3,408 16,119 7,374 0`Closed lionshead flAall Debt Service Fund 23,755 39,493 105,750 42,502 ;O:Closed Booth Creek Debt Service Fund 0 224,451 121,802 102;649: 40,511 41,856 (1,345) 101;304`; Total 18.107.279 28.585.593 34,524 419 0 2,039,842 ? :10:128:614<; 28,106,312 29,139,071 0 (1.032,759) `:'::9.095:857. FDSURA393.wk4 12/07/93 <; TOWN OF VAIL 1993THIRD.QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT ESTIM14TES TO YEAR SEND ; 1993 1993::: VARIANCE . GENERAL FUND.:REVENUE.; :iBUDGET :EST,tMATE; '.OVER/SUNpER Taxes Property & ownership Taxes 2,169,327 2,169,327 i; , ...Q Retail Sales Tax 7,023,200 7,170,700 147 500:: Ski lift Tax 992,250 992,250 0i Franchise Fees 506,000 504,400 ;:;;(1;600 Penalty & Interest 44,000 44,000: 0'; Subtotal Taxes 10,734,777 10,880,677 `;,145;900,:; Construction Fees 260,211 622,000 '":::=36'1;;789. Licenses ~ Permits 44,100 54,720 ;:>i:10;620: Charges for Services 208,832 206,460 >`.(2372 Transportation Centers 1,710,675 1,752,176 >;;<;'::;;;41505< _ . Intergovernmental revenue 930,168 945,000'''i<:":`:;,94,832' Fines & Forteitures 241,750 215,000 ' <:(26,750 Other 268,655 278,655 >;><:'.:>>1q;000 ITOTAL GF'REVENUE ;14;399;'!68 ...::>14;954688 ;:555;520 ' 199 1.993 ` VAR ANCE 'GENERAL FUND EXPENSES. ; ,BUDGET ;ESTLMATE : OVER/(UNDER Town Officials 831,836 831,600 a ::(236 Administrative Services 1,186,295 1,178,014 «:::::`:_.(8;281 Community Relations 174,103 170,829 ><:;;:;<`(3;274 Community Development 1,025,066 1,025,066 ..:.;::.:.::::..0..: _ Police 2,916,247 2,875,539:::;;;`:: <>`(A0,708 Fire 1,034,663 1,027,756 >;(6,9Q7 Public Works 2,423,432 2,347,284 .__,.,;:(76;148 Transit 1,954,870 1,951,455 '',(3415 Transportation Centers 1,046,653 1,046,568 : (85 VRD Contract 543,243 543,243 ' .0. Library 672,685 672,685 0 Insurance 282,292 271,504 (10,788 Contingency 7,900 7,900. <Q:, Contributions & Events 794,780 797,168 :<<;;:2388 Employee Benefits 30,227 24,325 > (5,902 ITOTAL!GF;EXPENOITURES >1.4924;292 14;770,936 ;('153,356 I.:: :SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL).. 183,752 I 2QTRFIN2 PAGE 2 12/07/93 3:993 '1993 VARIANCE CAPITAL P.. ROJECTS REVENUE BIJpGET.: ESTIMATE OUER!(UTVDER Retail Sales Tax 4,999,280 5,101,780 ':::':102,500. County Sales Tax 195,000 198,000 3;OOQ Ski Lift Tax 992,250 992,250::;":::: 0 Earnings on Investments 165,000 165,000.:::' >0; Transfer From 1992 Bond Proceeds Fund 2,632,957 s': ' ' 2;632,957 RETT Loan Repayment 929,743 929,743 '0 ~ :::TOTALREVENUE ; , 7;281.;273... 10,019730 2,738.;457 ~ '1993 :1993 VARIANCE CAPITAL.PRO.lECTS FUND EXP. BUDGET_;.._ ESTIMATE ..OyER%(UNDER `150 Misc. Sidewalks & W Ped Connection 175 '<175' 201 Street..Light Improvement Program 35,548 35,548 Q: 407. International Bridge Replacement 4,000 4,000 ' Q 510 Barking Structure Capital Maintenance 176,345 976,345 0' 511 Slifer Fountain Repair 39,844 40,000 155 515 Municipal Annex Remodel 2,553 2,553 0 524 Bus Shelter Imp ~ Replace 59,089 59,089 0 550 Misc. Building Maintenance 25,000 ~ 25,000 -'`4; 551 Town Shop Ventilation System 18,983 19,360 ;37.7 70.5 Streetscape Design 691 691 , > ......:..:...Q; . 904 Comm Sys Maint. & Replace 12,330 12,330 ' : 0 906 Replace Mobile Fire Radios 15,000 15,000 ' a. 921 Snow Dump Site 146,485 146,485: ' < '.0; 928 Land Purchase Vail Commons 3,170,000 3,132,957 (37,043 929 Performance & Arts Center 73,490 73,490 t)' 930 Fire Extraction Equipment 16,000 16,000. .;0: 931. Retrofit Buses Perimeter Seating 17,500 17,706 ' : _ 206 932 Relocate Checkpoint Charlie 500 386 <.;; =;`i <'(.1;14 Continued: 2QTRFIN2 ~ PAGE 3 12/07/93 1993 >:1993': - 'VARIANCE CAPITAL<PROJECTS FUND I=XP BUDGET; ESTIMATE ~VER!(UiVDER 981 Computer Oriented Irrigation Project 202 147 .(55 984 Pedestrian Overpass Walkway 9,235 9,235 : ' ''0 987 Second Radio Channel 16,000 16,000 , ;.:,0; 991 ADA Improvements 47,600 47,600 fl: 409 Gore Creek Bridge Enhancements 30,000 30,000 0: Golf Maintenance Parcel Purchase 195,914 187,490 `::(8.;424 West Vail Mudslide Mitigation 10,000 10,000 : : 0; Misc. Heavy Equip Vehicles 163,000 163,000 , 0: 9,010 Transfer to Debt Service 4,609,780 4,583,499 {2.6 281 Projects to be RoNed into 1994: 110 Street Maint & Improvements 929,057 870,739 {58,3.1.8 408 Chapel Bridge Design 94,000 76,000 {18 000 501 Snow Dump Road /Shop & Bus Barn Maint 234,990 0 (234 99Q 554 PW Office Remodel 439,898 65,000 (374;89$; 913: Bus Grant Matching Expense 59,000 5,000 (54;006 990 West Vail Interchange Improvement _ 1.70,000 55,000 (1:15,OOfl 553 Drainage Improvements 43,086 30,000 {13,086 706 Police Department Space Expansion _ 298,500 0 (298 500 804 VT.C Community Improvements 58,549 30,000 {28,549. Street Furniture Replacement 40,000 20,000:::;:>;' {20;000 989 Automate East Vail Interchange 9,900 0 (9 90Q Town- Manager Residence 40,000. 30,000 {10 000 Parking. Structure Landscape Contingency 26,312 2,784 {23 52.8. Electric Raceway & Carpet @ Library 35,000 0 (35,000: Shmetzco Berm 3,098 0 !:(3 098 Bus Grant Lobbyist 50,000 10,000 {40 000 Library Book Drop 4,800 1,050 (3 750 Bald Mountain Bus Stop 110,000 30,000 (80 000 Vail Road Medians 122;478 0 (122,478 Subtotal RoAforward Expenditures 2,768,668 1,225,573 11;543.;095, {T{)TAL EXPENDITURES 3:1663 757 10 049.;659 {1 6:.1:4 098 $URP.LUSi(SNORTFALL) _ (29;929) PAGE 4 12/07/93 2QTRF1N2 ' 4 1993 ;1993 VARIANCE .REAL ESTATE;TRANSFER TAX :BUDGET'.. <ESTIMATE... OVER/UNDER REVENUE RETT Taxes 1,200,000 1,900,000 700 000: Golf Course Lease/VRD 85,000 83,000 2,000 Recreation Amenities Fees 30,000 88,000 ::.:-::;::._:::::;:;:58,000 Lottery Revenue 12,000. 12,000 ,::.,.;0 Misc. Reimbursements for Projects 48,777 48 777; Earnings on Investments 65,000 65,000 .:::::::;:;;:_;:::.::U' ;TOTAL REVENUE 1;392;9Q0 ;`2;196;777 8Q4 777: EXPENDITURES Purchase of Open Space 340,432 340,432 0. Loan Repayment 929,743 929,743 0: Miscellaneous 500 500.. 0' 9,057 Ski Museum Park Site 128,375 128,375 0: 9,062 Gore Creek Promenade 85,780 85,780 0: 9,065 Stephens Park Phase II 100,208 107,882 7;674; 9,068 Dowd Junction Bike Path Design 140,309 140,309 <0< 9;070 Spraiidle Creek Parcel Purchase 483,656 500,666: > ">>:.'17.Q1,Q 9,074 Master Open Space/Rec Trail Plan 60,000 60,000. ij;: 9,OZ5 Alpine Gardens Contribution 25,000 25,000 .;:_;!"'>;,'0 9,081 Park Maintenance 129,353 129,353 0' 9,082 Rec Path Maintenance 91,400 91,400 0 Purchase of land Lionsridge 49,986 49,986. ' 0` Projects to be Rolled into 1994 9,051 Bighorn Park Completion 19,152 9,000 .::;.-;;:::.(10;9.52.- 9,058 Vail Trail Safety 2,200 0 (2;200 9,067 West Vail Bike Path 200,160 ~ 100,000 ;(;100~16U. 9,079 Frontage Road Bike Path 144,966 2,000 .`;:>::.;(142;966 9,084 Sandstone Park Improvement 26,526 10,000 '<!_'::';<;; (16;526 9,085 Dowd Junction Land Improvement 8,745 1,000 >::;;(7„745 9',086 TOT Lot Access Paths 9,971 0 (9.,.971 9,087 Pirate Ship Park 42,504 1,000 (41;504 9,089 Ford Park Stairway 32,250 3,000 ;:29,250: 9,090 Mill Creek/Ted Kindel Park 105,140 5,000 : ?'>,;:>,(100;'144 East Vail Interchange Landscaping 84,149 .65,000 ;:>;(.19;:149 Subtotal. Rollforward Expenditures 675,763 196,000 (479,763- (959,526 ITOTAL RETT.EXPENDIZURES;.; ::3,240;505 ,!::2;785;426. (455,079 ~ SURPLUS!(SHORTFALL} : ::1588;649) _...:a ;7:993. 1993 ;VARIANCE HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND BUDGE7 ' ESTIMATE OVER/(UNDER REVENUE 1,485,864 1,535,864 ;::'>";.;5p;000. ' EXPENDITURES 1,450 397 1,447,502 (2895- f SURPLlJS1(SHORTFALL) : .:::.::88;362 2QTRFIN2 PAGE 5 12/07/93 1993 » 1993:: VARIANCE SRECIAL.PARKING ASSESSMENT FUND BUDGET ESTIMATE OVER%(UNDER~ REVENUE Parking Assessments 20,000 56,500 <.:::.:::~;;<;>`.36,500.. Daily Parking Revenue 257,500 245,050 `:;:':`:;:;('12;450 Earnings on Investments ~ 4,500 4,500 0': ITOTAL<SP,4F;REVENUE : 282;000 ;::.306;050: 24,050.1 EXPENDITURES Transfer to Debt Service Fund 309,000 308,281 : (;7;19 IT9TAL::SPAF;EXPE.NQLTURES:: - 309;000 ,;:..::308;28# (719 C :::SURPLUS! (SHgRTi=ALL) {2,231) 1993 1993: S/ARIANCE MARKET'(idG FUND BUDGET- ESTIMATE OVERI(UNDER REVENUE Business Licenses 345,000 350,000 5,000; TOV Marketing Fund 160,500 178,769 <<';,!;; `18;269' Other Marketing Contributions 155,000 174,000 19 000.: Earnings..on Investments 7,000 7,000 ?:0 ITOTAL:MARKETING REVENUE ,::.667;500 ;;709;769.:..:.: ..:42;2691 1 1 (EXPENDITURES;:.. ; `725;000: ; 721;000-.:... , (4;000~I I ~ I .::BURP.. LUS[{SHORTFALL( _ (1:1;231 a . ' : I 1993 : ' 1993; VARIANCE PQLICE CONFISCATION FUND ; BUDGET: ESTIMATE OVER/(UNDER REVENUE d . . Confiscation Proceeds 10,000 10,000 - ; Q Earnings on Investments 16,000 16,000 0. ITOTAL`PCFREVENUE;: < .:26;000 26;000 01 EXPENDITURES 174,984 158,000 X16,,984 TQTAL;PCF;EXPENDITURES ' ' ...:174;384 :i :.:158;000: (_16,984. ;:::BURP. LUSt:(SHORTFALL~ is ; . ':{:132;000) 2~TRFIN2 PAGE 6 12/07/93 e 9993 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPR{ATION ITEMS .GENERAL FUND Town Officials: _ Bus Grant Lobbyist -Avon 90,620 Professional Fees -Town Manager Search 90,000• . Town Manager Replacement Costs 59 ,39 0 Cable TV Study (to be reimbursed) 20,79 8 Legal ~ Litigation Professional Fees 95.000 ~ . Total ~ 9 07, 648 Administrative Services: Town Manager Recruitment 95,000. Community Development AIPP Project 24,000 Library Contributions 54,837 Contributions ~ Others: Additional Marketing Contribution 9 9,000 Ride the Rockies 7,700 . !~lorkers Compensation ~ Unemployment = Allocated to Other Funds <24,493 > Reverse Previous Appropriation <97,250 > Total ~ 9 78.522 PAGE 7 1993 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION ITEMS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Bus Grant Lobbyist 50,000 Relocate Checkpoint, Charlie <219,850 > Computer Oriented Irrigation System <100,000 > Bald Mountain Bus Stop 110,000 Vail Road Medians 122,478 Municipal Annex Roll Forward 2,553 Reverse Duplicate. Supplemental -Loader <118,500 > Golf~Course Mainferiance Parcel Purchase 195,914 Goce:Creek Pedestrian Bridge Improvement 20,000 West .Vail Mudslide Mitigation (to be reimbursed) 10,000 Slifer Fountain Repair 10,000 Library Book Drop 4,800 Town Manager Residence 40.000 Total Capital Projects Fund 127.395 Rt i i .Land Purchase - Lionsridge 49,986 Ski Museum Park Reimbursement 29,000 . `Dowd Junction Path Reimbursement 12,485 West Vail Bike Path 50,014 Golf Course Maintenance Parcel Purchase <195,914 > Stephens Park Reimbursement 7.292 Total RC i i Fund <47 137 > HEF Worker's Compensation & Unemployment 21,092 tnsurance Allocated to Fund Vehicle Body Repair Expenditures 40.000 Total HEF Fund 61 092 POLICE CONFISCATION FUND Worker's Compensation & Unemployment ~ 1,530 Insurance Allocated to Fund PAGE 8 ,d P TOV~IN OF VAIL COUNCIL CONTINGENCY 1993 Original Sudget Amount $50,000 Uses: Performance and Conference Center Demand Analysis 15,000 - Sonus Pay for 20 Year Employees 6,000 . Professional Fees -Role Defining Town Council 6,000 . Contribu4on for Trip ~ Sooks, Pins for Soccer Club 1,000 Contribu4ion - WE Recycle 4,000 Contribution- Vail Religious Foundation 500 VA -TOV Strategic Planning Sessions 5,000 Burke Donation 200 Upgrade Survey Process 2,000 Shane Hanson Donation 200 !Bola Montoya Memorial Fund 200 Total Amount Used 42,100 Total Amount Left X7,900 COUCON92 PAGE 9 . 12/06/93 EXPENSES INCURRED BY TOWN OF VAIL FOR RIDE THE ROCKIES 1993 - DECEMBER 6, 1993 Advertising $2,346.00 Day of Ride Expenses 5,796.62 ($1500 - extra bus service TOV labor, Rental Tables, shower truck & sinks ($1596), ice, port-o-lets ($2330), balloon decorations ($1000), bike security ($397) Day of Ride Entertainment 1,000.00 . Electrical Expenses 4, 797.88 ($2650 -labor = 106 hrs x $25 /hr) Rider Specific Expenses 575.35 (Colored paper, candy) Meeting/Refreshment Costs 154.06 Miscellaneous 82.85 Miscellaneous Supplies 1,199.44 (Letterhead $780) Postage 2, 346.00 (4 mailings -two to riders and two to merchants) T-Shirts for Volunteers 1,644.77 Rider Coupon Books 1,187.00 ($2187 - $250 contribution from Firstbank of Vail) TOTAL $21.829.97 ~~EC1~91L ?1'%I~~ 1f'1~ l~Lf~~~Ge Vail Valley Foundation (see attached) $1,425.00 Vail Associates (see attached) 5,873.00 -Town of Avon (Lent 80 x 100 tent & labor to set up/take down) Vail Valley Special Events Commission 6,500 Cash Contribution Firstbank of Vail 250 Cash Contribution . ~~~ffiJ~~S %Pg ~ D~ T `V~S~ ~ ? ~'®Ei ~I~E T ~~~IES 5993 Leo 5993 ~anci $ 650 0 00 Sound 350000 ~nphithea~er 425000 $1425000 \C:\rtrcoete.hmz . d~~3-ur-fir aa~ « au;s~~~~Ja7 VHiL=MRRKETiNG OP5 r'0~ . _tl . u y q~.g ~y ~~°p Y ~ q ~ yy ~IS~~ iS y FiIQ`7 ~s o ~a'~ 8J 1S Ll~d\1 A ~ ' d ~9 Il . _ ~ ~ Ro~k~ bute~,d,~ ~50ffia~ $1,~36'~ _ fl~3-94 Ski P $fl,450 ~ 'T~?o nights at ~A ir,v~,wC~? for te~® 2~ ~ Raund of golf fir ~ r~ ~a ~y ae Piny lti~i~r ~nc4~ fog t~+o fl5o ~ Full day snoun~irt bid rental for tevo 5fl ~ ~,ion~;,;~d gondola ridgy 20'' ~¢ennial ~cprr~ss ridgy c 2,11 . ~'eYso~~ Iinackag~_ - Dis6ount n~~ FlasciC cgs ~,4~ dad's P~~t ~ _ Foci and Beds 5~ II~b®~ _ Ford Park ~t up and t~~down ~,17t1'~ laver ~k see up and -damn fl~ ~ ~'~tt ug and tsar-dowm _ _ . _ 1,425 ~ ~ VAI probided S'19 wo~a o~ spar baa~ b~~ bum. ~st[n~Bed r..~?tion r~ of 5% .fir advertising dept.). 9 C:\~>rCefl~tt~wwy.R`tFiC®~~.XL~ A k Aa" e e4 ~'®i~il ®F SAIL 75 South Frontage Road . fail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 F~1X 303-479-2157 T0: RIDE THE ROCKIES PERMANENT FILE FROM: PAM BRANDMEY DATE: 26JUL93 RE: INKIND/TORN OF VAIL SALARY CONTRIBUTIONS COORDINATION OF THIS EVENT WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTIONS, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED BELOW: CAROLINE FISHER $1,920.00 120 HOURS PAM BRANDMEYER $3,840.00 180 HOURS MISCELLANEOUS TOV PERSONNEL $1,000..00 (EMPLOYEES RELEASED FROM REGULAR DUTIES TO HELP WITH VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES, I.E., TOMMY COLLINS, LINDA WOLZ, BOB MACH,.LARRY.GRAFEL, DD DETO, ETC.) $6,760.00 n e ~'®1~VN ®F VAIL ~4 . 7S Soutb Frontage Road Departmcni of Public 1Forks/Transportation fail, Colorado 81657 303-X79=21 S~/FAX 303-479-2166 ORA3dD~ 0 T0: - Pam Brandmeyer FROM: Debbie Roeland DATE: August 28, 1993 RE: °`Ride the Rockies'° Salary Costs NAME REGULAR HOURS OT HOURS TODD OPPENHEIMER 57.50 CHARLIE BOOMHOWER 22.00 8.00 ANDREA JANUSZ 6.00 7.75 PETER MILLER 8.00 6.50 LOUIS SANCHEZ 27.50 15.C0 DIANE STANEK 4.00 JEANNE WILSON 2.50 WAYNE SMITH 24.00 9.25 FRANK MARTINEZ 8.00 JOE KOCHERA 10.00 JIM HOZA 18.00 8.00 DAVID SANCHEZ 5.00 SAMMY SANDOVAL 6.00 LEONARD SANDOVAL 9.00 CHARLIE OVEREND 8.00 GILBERT GONZALES 10.00 BRIAN HOYT 5.50 ALBERT MAES 40.00 BRIAN CANEPA ~ _ 4.50 ~.!'t 20. oo - ~O~'~ ~O~%3.S 2 5 9.0 0 61.0 0 '~OT'~ ~®S~S $3, 697.13 $942.40 TOWN OF VAIL ADDITIONAL BUS SHUTTLE SERVICE, PROVIDED FROM NOON, 6/23/93, THROUGH 9:00 A.M. THURSDAY, 6/24/93. $1,500.00 (FIGURE FROM MIKE ROSE) I-~yi-~.. l(rl(,(, ~1teLk.~t~ k.~rca. ~?L~ ~ 1~~ 4 d~~ ~'w$~"s?..s".`~'~e.."~@`?~asgv`F~:~cir~`+~'€~`r~°bed:,~'",:'it4"i~?~"st~TUd:.~~'3~...zs~s~3"` ~.~~r.'S~"".~~"i'XA.'~Y"~ltk:~'~,',s:~~a.,p~c~4~!y_-~!."~r_~ ~.,~_~+r~~.ascaan~.,+•,n,~acm~ ~5~.~»z~h _ _ _ - i . •-.~N ~ .y s ~ - - r:, . - s ~ ` , „moo . - ~ ~ - ~dfi ?I:a ~ ~ ~ _ ~S x; i INN - - ~t.~rnp~- 1____. J\ -•7~ LL ;a i-J1 ..ice ~ , FA 1, 30' - ~•S ~ ~ ri ~z 1 ~ t~ l _ ~ ~ 71' ~r~l - ~ f R . ~ A ~ ~ ~ 4Fti_ t n 1990, after six years of existence. was half-right. Riverfest was a blast. ~e~0. 0~ Washington, D.C.'s annu~il River- Over its short lifespan, it turned into one test celebration drowned in a cur- of the East Coast's biggest outdoor rent of red ink. No one questioned events. Vlore dl~m a million spectators its popularitt-in fact, lord resi- gravitated to the Potomac riverfront dents complained that it attracted too each June to join in die fishing contests, l~~t[1D~ S$®~B~ ~D~~yO~'11~9 many spectators-but city officials model boat regattas, crab racing, fi•og- deemed it too expensive to operate. hopping exhibitions and other events. {~(~j~p°~ The announcement of Riverfest~s But the festival had a voracious demise reminded some of the day in appetite for city fiords. Admittedly, pout Q~fl®9B~B~~DEI'll®[1.9~ 1981 when die plums for a festival on dte of the problem was the spare-no-cost Potomac were first announced. ~-es. menh>lity of organizers. Beyond the nor- there were concerns about the cite oral operating budget of a gala four-day ~o~~~ ~0~ putting up half of the $150,000 bud~,et, festival, volunteers and city officials said then-Mayor Marion Barry. but were busy heating d~emselves to lavish ~~e~~~~~~~~~ ~13[l°(E: there wus no cause for alarn~, because receptions, luxury eniises and hospitai)- s~>Zes tax revenues would make up for it. ity boats. And die excesses did not stop ~~~[1°~a~~ "The rehun on our money will be more there: Even after die festival was mod~- dian $15,000," said Btnry. "Vlore impor- balled, the Department of Recreation tant, it will be a ferried staf}ers, ~~Il~FJ'B'llo lot of lim.., ~~a<~::a.~,~~:~e. ~~r~~a?~~,~r~ ~ag~ ® political sup- At lcust Beiny ~ Eio~tl°9~C~~~ ~~~~Q porters and -10 COVI:RNIN(; Au„lust 1993 _ ;SI~iRli . h.. .S~v~i ~x~ ~ ae^„ay W. ~J~~.-~J.J.~~.a ~i f M1,- a a.:~~ ~ ;i.: v • I - i - - \ 'mod' _ _g - 1 .l _ I ~~,L££x 'L 1' 1 tl. - x..J... J rt k _ a~~ ~r i r ti ~ _ ~ _ ` / ~ ti _ -.~3+~~. ,yc--s; ~--„a- _ UGC z-~ _ °r'°-.-s.~.~- .h',-s- u - x: mar "1 - H~-~a~:-F ~^}-tom ~6 7r - a assorted cronies on a 517,000 cruise, local government in die 1980s. In recent The annual Taste of Chicago But die real issue was not question- years, there has been a major Change nr celebration draws immense crowds and makes money. It also able spending practices: It was who was mbetn festival psycholo~ry• spends a fortune on maintenance really footing die bill for Riverfest. Cor- Until recently, most cities gladl} and security-more than poste sponsors anted up less than forked over finding for festivals, if not $I million every year. expected-about one-drird of the bud- by paving a direct subsidy, then at least get-so by and large. taxpayers took die by providing free services. A feu' hit. In 1984, $7,000 seemed a small charged fees, but they dicl so haphaz- price to pay for a big boost in civic pride. artily, ~~~idi no follow-up on collection. By 1986, die budget had quadrupled. In Political connections, event size and 1988, it was repotted drat over the festi- economic impact usually played roles in val's first four- years, the District of determining whether a festival was Columbia had picked up most of the charged for use of city services. Some X1.2 million-plus total tab. Local oflici~ils paid; most did not. hacl no choice but to put Riverfest out of But bitter experience has taught cities the city's fiscal misen~ in 1990. that there is a considerable tab for dre By pulling the plug on Riverfest, municipal services rendered, and drat ~Vashing~ton jouted a ~b~~ing number of usually it is the government that gets ctsh-strapped cities that hay°e been recon- shrck paying it. At the very least, cities siclerinc; die pros <md cons of dre summer are telling festival organizers that dlev festival, one of dre showcase economic can no longer aflord to subsidize it all. development <urd promotion schemes for Events must find a way to pay for die ~~,~ifr;~~~~ u~-,~„fil.ti~ar,a pbo~~,ci~upl,; GOVH;RNING August 1993 41 l ~ smaller festivals usually cannot r pass the buck to corporate sugar daddies. So what festival plan- ners are hearing from city offi- g cials, in effect, is pay up or shut down. Since virtually every place - on the map runs some kind of - , aL., ` special public event-whether it • -~-~a ~ ' _ be the Talkeetna Nloose Drop- . ~ ~ ; ~ ! ping Festival in Alaska or the _ ~ ~ ~ i _ nationally recognized Taste of ~ ` ~ ' Chicago-the new practice of ~ charging for city services has \ , already generated a decline in 4 ~ ~ I~ the number of fairs and festivals ~ ~ ~ ~ /7 held. till, festivals remain ' ~ . . 1 highly popular with the F :ar ~ " - ~ _ public and with elected ;F=~ A,. 4 city officials. What politician wants to oppose a festival' A suc- cessful event is an image booster B • ~ that adds to a city's overall qual- ~ ~ - Sponsors of Seattle's Seafair festival claim that it brings the community ity of life. Local merchants and $37 million annually in tourism and other local economic benefits. vendors love the idea Of an info- . ~ sion of tourist dollars. City oEli- police who work overtime to direct traf- fit~il. Org~mizers can fi-ecluently find cor- cials love to see suburbanites come fic and set up b~uricades; the sanitation poste benef ictot-s to meet the cost of downtown. Mayors love the free public- workers who clean up after the water- the government service fees. But for ity in the newspapers and on television. melon-eating contest and haul away the smaller festivals and those that have "There seem to be hvo easy things to ~ hot dog wrappers, deflated balloons zuxl , never bean profitable overtll, any addi- sell to a local government," says Steve empty bottles; and the emergency med- tionc~l costs ~u~e an onerous burden. Chambers, executive director of the ical technicians who treat the seriously Unlike their huger counterp~uts, the Western Fairs Association. "Number ~ injured and those who suc- cumb to the heat, excite- i~ I ment, bratwurst or beer. It is no longer possible for cities to ignore the fact that wW~~~~ _ ^ any large-scale festival requires significant police _ overtime and sanitation ser- vices. And in the case of F smailler chanty events, more than a few cities have r~lcu- - Iated that it would be - +`~1 ~ i cheaper to cancel the event - r I and make a direct charitable ~ ~~i - contribution from the trea- ' a - - - - ~ sury than to assign city cops _ . and garbage collectors. So ~ - _ } ~ ' k what most cities are now ~ _ _ ' 3 doing is telling the festivals _ ® ~.rr~ if they want city services, it will cost them. ~ ~ i 4 ' For some of the largest ~ ~ r ~ events, the f ors in America's ~ ~ ~ r' big cities that draw bun- r a-: ~ r dreds of thousands of peo- ~ ple-~md millions of outside Promoters of Wichita's Riverfest work year-round to convince the city tourist dollars-it is hardly council that their fair is a financial bonanza to the community. k 42 GOVERNING August 1993 ti 1 . y'"""~' ~v _ - J t. _ 4.. ~ ~ ~ - ~ :h ~ F ~ z '3,~ ~n` - _ _ i ~ ~ 4 r~ ~tz z a _ - The small town of Lisle, Illinois, attracts 120,000 people to its `Eyes to the Skies' balloon festival. When the village government proved unwilling to meet security and cleanup costs, corporate sponsors made up the difference. one is a sports team-cities will give electricity, emergency medical services, accordingly. This year, that bill is' away then- children for one. On a smaller s<uiitation and police overtime. Only sip expected to be between $150,000 and scale, the next thing is a festiv~~l." years ago, that fee amounted to just S200,000. Another festival of renown, The truth, however, is that only a $43,000. LK2st year, in the new age of fes- the Portland Rose Festival, operates handfi?1 of special events draw huge tival fiscal realism, the total was $12 with a similar fee struchire to cover its crowds and make big money. There is a million. The bulls of that went to pay for i0-plus events. The system has become misguided perception, says Carolyn security. In order for the Taste of a necessity, especially since half amil- Penderg~ut, vice president of the Inter- Chicago to be held, traffic has to be lion spectators come to the Grand Floral national Festivals Association, that festi- rerouted, barricades must be set up, Parade alone. vals are ctsh cows. "A lot of times festi- crowds need to be controlled. vals are perceived as large events that This is typical of many of America's airs like those know that in the draw large numbers of people," she most successful summer events. Bob Fend, the. money can be found to says, "but in re~~lity, most festivals are at Gobrecht, managing director of Seattle's pay the city back. But for smaller around the break-even point." Seafair, one of the West Coast's largest or less successfiil fairs, any municipal fee By any measure of success, one of the festivals, says rising security costs are is a frightening thought. "A new charge biggest and most profitable fairs in the the major factor behind the hard line on of $20,000 or $30,000 that you weren't country is the Taste of Chicago, an billing festivals. "You can talk about expecting is enough to shut down a festi- amlual food festival that attracted 2.5 other issues," he says, `but this is really val," says Pendergast of the Interna- million visitors last ye~u-. As festivals go, about police overtime." tional Festivals Association. it is unusually lucrative-in 1992, it The final bill for security services can More than a few have met that fate in raked in a net profit of ne~u-ly $1 nullion. be a shock to organizers, especially if no recent years, and the list is growing. Those revenues are plowed back to the serious effort was made to budget for Waukesha, Wisconsin, lost its three-year- Mayor's Office of Special Events, which them in adv~mce. In Seattle, police and old Swing Into Sunnier event after a pri- uses them to pay for costs incurred by festival sponsors sit down ahead of time vate operator pulled out and the city the smaller neighborhood festivals that and estimate the number of spectators decided against sponsoring it. Likewise, are not charged for city sen~ices. likely to attend each of the festival's indi- ~~Iilwaukee's South Shore Water Frolic, Larger than the ultimate profit, how- vidual events, and from that figure, held annually since 1948, sank this year ever, is the check that sponsors of Taste determine the number of officers after organizers decided it was too of Chicago have to ~~1ite to the city for assigned to the event and set a fee expensive to nm. A number of reasons GOVERNING August 1993 43 f .._K. . were cited, including police costs. And Some cities still subsidize festivals or had an $18.8 million economic impact. Lisle, Illinois, came ~~ithin an eyelash of donate free services, but increasingly, In Milwaukee, research showed the 11- losing its Eyes to the Skies hot-zur-bat- they want to know what's in it for them. day 1991 Summerfest raised ahnost $10 loon festival last year after village They are asking questions they did not million in state and local tax revenues. tllrstees voted to decrease their annual ask in the 1980s-detailed questions Seattle Seafair's research survey pointed contribution to its operation. The fiir about the financial or public relations to $37 million, which would put its fair asked for $f3,000 to cover security and return on their investment. In response, in a league with the Kentucky Derby cleanup costs for the 120,000 Chicago- some festival sponsors are becoming Festival, the Portland Rose Festival and area spectators who were expected to very sophisticated about presenting the Fiesta Bowl Festival. "More and attend. The village offered 5=15,000. their case. more cities are looking at the bottom Faced with that big a gap for an event Barbara Y~unell, executive director of line," says Yarnell. "We understand with total projected costs of S209,000, Wichita Festivals Inc., the non-profit what's happening." organizers decided to cancel the festivi- orgviization drat runs the city's popular ties. Only the last-minute intervention of River Festiv:~l, makes a special effort to ities that watch the bottom line a hastily created comnuttee saved Lisle's explain the worth of the event in eco- too closely, though, can run . moment in the sun by accepting the nomic ternis. Last year, Wichita Festi- , some troublesome political risks. town's offer and raising the rest from vr~ls Inc. prepared market research fig- Closing the curtain on a popular event : corporate sponsors. ores indicating that the 10-day festival usually means a spate of awkward and embarrassing publicity, as with last sum- Pie' 'j mer's round of complaints against the ` ; Baltimore city government's indifference to the value festivals had brought the city. Noting that the Jewish Festival and the Tour Du Pont cycling race had fled Baltimore for more hospitable climes- and the Latino Festival and Fells Point ~ Fun Festival were threatening to close ~Y~, down because of increased fees-the ~h! Baltimore Sun hinted that Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke and his administration were ~ - chasing the good times away. . ~ It was not just the new service fees 5, " that peeved event organizers, critics ' ~ • ~ ~ x said, but bureaucratic red tape and lack of enthusiasm at City Hall. The critics seemed to have little patience for ~ Schmoke's explanation that the city could simply no longer afford to donate ' w \ thousands of dollars of services for each ~ xr 7 ~ . ~ 4`~ and every event. • ' r r is ' _ The answer for cities struggling with a t`'~ r this problem may be a middle ground: " Encourage popular festivals; but rather r than subsidizing them, help them find ~ the money another way. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for example, puts money into festivals, but only after marketing HE MAY NOT BE FAMILIAR WITH LICKING COUNTY, OHIO. them aggressively to the local business BUT HE KNOWS STANDARD & POOR'S. community. Harrisburg has a special Informed financial decisions begin with a rating from events OfliCe, now lri its ninth year, with Standard & Poor's. No matter ~vho you are or where you're a marketing executive whose sole task is from, a municipal rating from 5&P provides you with reliable, New York to sohelt Corporate festival sponsorships. objective credit assessments. Viclue roman Before the s eeial events office was ere- Executive Managing p Participants in the financial markets expect unpazalleled °ir~tOf czlz) zoa-1729 ated, Harrisburg held three festivals a rating services From S&P-and they get them. Both issuers San Francisco year. Now it runs more than 40. and investors benefit from our commitment to providing Steve Zimmermann unbiased credit information to the municipal market through Managing Director Forty festivals is a bit on the high (415) 1655000 our credit anatysis, seminars and publications. Side, but few residents are complaining. We invite your inquiries into our ratings anti services. The people of Harrisburg, like those of ~rl• almost every city in America, still love a STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS GROUP parade. And they don't particularly care ' who pays for it. 44 COVLRI\'ING _au„ust 1993 rt ~ DESIGN REVlEVN BOARD AGENDA December 1, 1993 3:00 P.E?A. PROJECT ORIENTATION 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. SITE VISITS 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. 1. Spradd{e Creek Estates -Spraddle Creek Subdivision. 2. Golden - 1403 Moraine Drive. 3. Vacation Video - 2077 North Frontage Road. 4. The Dancing Bear - 2211 North Frontage Road. 5. Koenig - 2516 Arosa Drive. 6. Gondola Building - 600 Lionshead Mall. 7. Gotthelf's - 196 Gore Creek Drive. 8. Bellezza, Ltd. - 278 Hanson Ranch Road. 9. Borne - 4302 Glen Falls Lane. Drivers: Shelly and Andy PUBLIC HEARING 3:00 p.m. 1. Spraddle Creek Estates -Sign program. ~MM Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision. Applicant: SBC Development Corporation. MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Sally Brainerd VOTE: 5-0 Approved 2. Vacation Video -Sign application. SM 2077 North Frontage Road/Brandess Building. Applicant: George Sedlack MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved with condition that 12" x 60" sign be used. 3. The Dancing Bear -New sign. SM 2211 North Frontage Road/West Vail Lodge. Applicant: Cindy Terowskey MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved 4. Gray -New primary with restricted secondary residence. SM 2672 Lupine Court/Lot 6, Block 2, Vail Intermountain Subdivision. Applicant: Harry Gray MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Approved with changes. 5: Borne -New single family residence. AK 4302 Glen Falls Lane/Lot 12, Forest Glen Subdivision. Applicant: Bob Borne MOTION: Sally Brainerd SECOND: Jeff Bowen VOTE: 3-0 Approved with conditions. 6. Bel!ezza, Ltd. -New sign. AK 278 Hanson Ranch Road/Lot B, Block 5-A, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Gary Meanea MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved 7. Alfalfa's -Exterior modifications. AK 143 East Meadow Drive/Lot P, Block 5D, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Bob West MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. 8. Golden -Fence addition. SM 1403 Moraine Drive/Lot 24, Dauphanais/Moseley Subdivision 1st Filing. Applicant: Paul Golden MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Sally Brainerd VOTE: 5-0 Approved with conditions. Afl fences for this subdivision will be limited to steel pickets painted brown or black. Landscaping should be added with each fence. 9. Gramshammer -New fence. SM 231 East Gore Creek Drive/Gasthof Gramshammer. Applicant: Pepi Gramshammer MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Tabled Indefinitely 2 10. Koenig -Restricted secondary unit addition. SM 2516 Arosa Drive/Lot 10, Block C, Vail Das Schone 1st Filing. Applicant: Bernard Koenig MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved with condition that (5) 2-1/2`' caliper aspens be used. 11. Vail Valley Niedical Center - New n foot diameter satellite. dish. JC 181 West Meadow Drive/Lots E and F, Block 1, Vail `?illage 2nd Filing. Applicant: Vail Valley Medical Center MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved 12. Gotthelf's -Facade changes. JC 196 Gore Creek Drive/Lots A, B, C, Block 5-C, Vail Village 1st Filing. Applicant: Paul Gotthelf MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Consent approved with condition that roof finish be mat and corners be 6" radius instead of 12" as shown. 13. Gondola Building -Building repaint and new awnings. JC 600 Lionshead Mall/Lot 4, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing. Applicant: Tim Kehoe/Vail Associates MOTION: Mike Arnett SECOND: Bob Borne VOTE: 5-0 Approved with changes. 14. Spruce Creek Townhomes, #6 -New single family residence. AK 1850 South Frontage Road West/Spruce Creek Townhomes, Phase III. Applicant: Mike Lauterbach MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: 'Tabled indefinitely. 15. Vail Golfcourse Townhomes -Fire Door. AK 1720 Sunburst Drive, Unit A-1/Vail Golfcourse Townhomes. Applicant: Bill Sargent MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Withdrawn. 3 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Mike Arnett Bob Borne Sally Brainerd George Lamb Jeff Bowen (PEC) STAFF APPROVALS Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision -Modifications to approved plans. 914 Spraddle Creek Road/Tract C, Spraddle Creek Estates Subdivision. Applicant: Tim Haase/Spraddle Creek Estates Builders Mathias -Interior 250 addition (extension of loft). 1081 Vail View Drive, Unit B-207/Homestake Condominiums. Applicant: Earnest Mathias Assenmacher -Change to approved plans. 4455 Gien Falls Lane/Lot 5, Glenn Falls SDD. Applicant: Gerhard Assenmacher May -Changes to approved plans. 1119 Ptarmigan Road/Lot 6, Block 5, Vail Village 7th Filing. Applicant: Paula May Hellberg -Minor modifications to building permit. 355 Forest Road/Lot 1, Block 2, Vail Village 3rd Filing. Applicant: Joe Hellberg ' Savoy Villas -Window modification on south elevations of Phase I and II Buildings. 1100 North Frontage Road/Simba Run SDD. Applicant: Walid Said Timberfalls, Phase II -Add new window. 4516 East Meadow Drive, Unit 810/Timberfalls, Phase II. Applicant: Stephan Livingston Hughes Precious Metal Design -Remodel of existing bay window, front door and awning. 531 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 3, Block 1, Vail Lionshead 1st Filing. Applicant: Thomas Hughes Cleaver's Deli -New sign. ' 520 East Lionshead Circle/Lot 5, Block 1, Vai! Lionshead 1st Filing. Applicant: Tom Cleaveland 4 Nicol Interior 250 -Extension of existing loft. 1081 Vail View Drive, Unit B-106/Lot A-6, Block A, Liorisridge 1st Filing. Applicant: Camille Nicol Apollo Park, Building A -New window/renovation of common area. 442 South Frontage Road/Tract D, Vail Village 5th Filing. Applicant: Ann Beck/Apollo Park at Vail The Sweet Life -Sign application. 520 Lionshead/Lionshead Center Building. Applicant: Gary Neal Vail Resortwear -Sign application. 291 Bridge Street, Unit C-6/Plaza Building. Applicant: Charlie Stone 5 ~n®w~lc~ss-~iUcJcc~~ ~i~e ~~®t~c~i®n ~is~~ict ~ P.O. (3ox 6436 Snowmass Village, ColoracJo 81615 9Q3-QQ1Q RTovember fl 0, fl 993 Chief Dick Duran mail Fire Department 42 blest 11Readow Drive Mail, CC) ~ 1657 Dear Chief Duran: Enclosed is a report which is Ilse cumulation of several months worth of phone ca11s to other resort area Fire Districts and Departanents. 'This survey was completed on September 29, fl993. I hop€ that you will find this information of some benefit to you. Sincerely, v..oe~n-~ Susan Campbell ' Office ]tanager a ILarSe Arm 1'®~~ HI~PYJI~is~ ~~e9 7g Square Rhtifles Avon: 4~ Square A/Iifles Coffer Attn.: s Square Aviles Crested butte: 3 Square files, nnutual aid to flit a+est ®f the area. T~ilflon: 3 Squaw files, anutual aid t® the C®uaty. 1Fris~,o: fl0 Square AR,iles, but ~ respoand to 28 square wiles. ~aeksosn: Il fl 9 Square Aviles, Plus mutual aid agreemeants. Ket6huaaa: 80 Square ARf lcs oth Lakes: 4 Square A~ifles Park City: fl00 Aviles lied Itiveg: ~5 Square ARiles Iced, ~lhite ~ flue: fl38 Squaw Aviles Silverthorne: 3 fl 0 Square i~f les Snake River: 1 S Squaw files Snoass~Wild~t: fl9 Squaw Ades S 484 Squaw Aviles ~'aos: fl2,000 Square ARiles ~'eflluride: 390 Aviles ~'etoan ~IillaBe: 2 Square Ades Mail: fl 3 Square A/Iifles Minter Park: 249 Square ARiles ~1fia~~ ~ ~l~e perr~~~aen~ pmp~o~ ~®e~ ~a°~~ d"~D~~: ~,®0® Copp~P AR$.~.: 200 ~8'CS$~ ~lll fl,~00 ~fl~o~: 2,000 J~kson: fl4,000 ~e~h~: x,000 ffio~ta flues: ~,~00 = 8,000 auk Caty: fl~,000 Its fltaw~: X00 . Rte, ~ ~ ~fl~: x,000 ~~flvo~: 2,800 ~aa~c ~v~: 2,0®0 Sno s°Wn~ fl,300 3.: fl9,000 '~~os: 9,000 'P~ll~araai~: o~. s,000 'fl'~ton ~Tallage: fl00 tl AS!!d. ~,'IWIV Wiat~rr auk: fl,0~0 wag fls 4fl~e p~k pop~Iagl®n f®rr q®~a° sea°~ice ~r~~ Aspen: 2,000 Avon: 30,000 - 36,000 Copper R~tn.: fl0,000 - flg,000 Crested ~ 5,000 Dallon: 11,000 Fras6o: ~ fl 3,000 J~kson: 50,000 - 60,000 Kct6lauffi: fl x,000 moth bakes: 35,000 Park Cary: 32,000 ' Iced Itfver: fl~,000 Iced, ~Ihate ~ 13flue: 30,000 Salverthorne: 50,000 Snake haver: fl 3,000 Snowr~~ss-~laldcat: fl 3,000 Steaanl~oat: X0,000 - 50,000 'Taos: 23,000 T'elfliarade: ~.ppr®~. 10,000 'TC$on ~I~llage: 2,300 - 3,000 ~laifl: 30,000 a 35,000 ~Tanter Park: 26,000 e 30,000 Asg~a: 39 ~woa: S6 C.,~4~'e~ sta.: Il ~ Ca~stcd ~t I,nlloa: 32 ~ris~o: ~6 ~~kaoa: 9~ l~etcFna~a: 32 oth mss: 6~ auk City: sIl . ~tav~: ~ ll mod,, ~it~ ~ s2 ~~lv~ho8a~: 2~ ~aak~ Rnv~g: 2~ 3aoss~~1f 18: ~4! Stmt: ; 32 ~'~os: 2~ ~ ~ . ~'~lflta~ad~: ~2 '8'~toa ~/aflflage: Il ~ ~l~afl: ~ ll Wia auk: 49 ®~~y ~~ld ~®nnel d® Y®~ ha~e~ Aspen: 3 ~ist~ict R~anager, Five I~tarsbal, ®Pfice l~lanager) Avon: Il~ Coppeg Attn.: s C~sted fl3utte: ~ fl~ilflon: 2 Faasco: 6 ~acflcson: ~ (Chief, Fire Al~arshal, se~,d~;d~y) ~eteht~: ~ oth ~.akes: ~ (Chief, Asst. Chief, and three staffpersonnefl) Fuflc City: 2ll l[ted fl2i~er: 2 ~ted, white ~ ~fli~e: 9 ~aflverthorne: 3 Same flamer: S Sno WiYd~at: ~ 3te~fl~t: 4 'B'aos: g 'fl'eflflaaride: 2 (Chief and Assistant Chief ~'eton Tillage: Mail: ~ ll9 ~linte~ ~ (Chief, ~ ' trative Assistant) . - naa®y ~®flasn~~~s d~ ~®aa ha~e~ ' Aspen: 36 Avon: 14 Copper fl3 Crested 13utte: 29 Dalton: 30 . Fris6o: 30 Jacl~son: 9 fl . KeY~huffi: 24 (Paid on Call) . moth I..~lces: 65 Park Katy: (Fart-tame paid ~r shift of 24.2s hours) ' IZed River: 29 Iced, ~Ihate ~ 131ue: Saflverthorne: 23 Snake haver: 23 Snor~aass-~hlald~t: 25 Steamboat: 2~ . Taos: 23 ' Telflurade: ~0 Teton ~/allage: Il 3 Vaifl: fl2 (Student ]Fare Faghters) . 2 (Active Voflunteers) lAlinter ]Park: 43 What l~eneilts d® Y®aa have f®~ y®a~ ~oltant~~sY Aspen: fltetflxd~.ent; fliealth, Wellness ~ Fitness program 5300.00 per year preapprove~l. Avon: group fl,ife; Paid T ' Cop~r ARtn.: Pension; Workers Compensation; 541.00 per month cash benefit if the pC8'SOn ffiCets CCYtalrr rCt1Y«~~.e„~,a.ts, fl.e., 6Q~® of the tt~lnrngs and of all calls. Crested Butte: See attache<il copy of volunteer benefit program. Dilflon: t't'~A Pension; 'G'ravel ~ Education; Social Events Frisco: 'lChe District gives the lloluateers 53,000. to do Frith as they please; ski passes to Copper IViountain; Full gym set up; lJse of the Station for personal vehicle maintenance; Iiepititus B shots; Biannual physicals. Jackson: Workers Comp.; Extra flnsiuance Policy; Pension Plan. Ketchum: fob injury insurance package that is equal to their pay; Pay fi„ ~ $9.00 to 512.00 per hour or any part of an hour; physicals, and ~anf forYns. oth ILakes: Health Cflub discount; N Park City: ®~er more disablity than is required; AD & D; Weekly benefit; S~/® r~,~ent rnt0 457 FuIId; lJnrf~,g~..s, Boots, All 'I'ramang. ILed River': Ite ' plan; on the job related insurance; working on a group health ' plan that the members can buy into. flied, White ~ 131ue: volunteers can earn tuition paid at CIVIC, Alpine slide tickets, ski passes, hotel rooms, golf passes, movieJilCR rentals. Earned by lbeing ~ duty at the file station, earning and keeping certifications up to date, and by their activity level. Sflverthor~: l[.ife ;Ski passes. Snake fl~ive8: I[.ife ' ce; Pension; E Fire Science aftes~ fl year; EA~'~fl a fl year; EtVI7C P one®half after three years. . - Snoass-Wild~~t: Workers Coa~poa~sation Ins A~gdentafl Beath ~ Disffieanber~nent Insurance ~etiAeauent Pension Plan Sno~ass Athletic Clut~ Pass Pia~e ~ Afledical 'Training Paid So~aal Activities Car Wash Shop ~ 'Toofl ~Jse Recreational Facilities Steamboat: Season pass for bus, skating rank, skiing an 'Town. Nlaxinaum benefits for Pension. ~'aos: Workers Comp.; A~adent Ia~surance Telluride: 1Ng'~'A; Weight set up Teton Village: If they lave in the District, they receive $ fl 00.00 per month towards their housing. Vail: I-Iousing plus X120. per 24 hour shift that isn't scheduled; . va~inations; ski pass in winter; golf/skating/tennis pass an sumaner; workers comp. l~linter Park: Insurance Plan; Federa113ene~its; InE:,.~i~ ve program for clothing; car wash fatality. 1~®~ ®any ~lIls ltd y®u have ?as4 y~a°~' assn: ~0 C~neral alarms, this doesn`t include officer calls. Avon: fl,1 g0 Emergency Calls; fl 90 non-cmergency calls (Fay flnsgections, flock outs, etc.) Comer Afltn.: 200 Crested Eutte: 3 fl Firs Calls Dillon: 3g0 Frisco: X70 Jackson: fl~ TCetchnaan: fl,000 oth g,akes: a~rox. 200 Park City: 1,06fl flied fltnver: ~g4 flied, ~Ihite ~ Eflu~: a'ox. 900 3ilverkhoane; 600 Snake fltiver: 709 Snovvmass~Wifldc~t: X30 Steamtroat: X34 ~'aos: X75 'T'elluride: 36 Fire Calls ~'eton ~Iillage: 6 . tl 69dll: b,~J® Minter Park: fl fl6 I~®~ ts~any wlta4 pereeutage 4hou calls ~e~~ ~edl~l~' Aspen: Avon: 294 Medical Calls equals about 2S®/® C~r~r~u fl~tn.: Il Crested ~ 220 ~illo~: 9g VVe have ~ first response rescue squad that assists the County a~abulance service. Frisco: S4. fl®/° were ffiedical and trai~ic accidents Jackson: ~etchuffi: 2Il~ oth Hakes: 600 a 900 Park City: ~9°/® lied hover: ' ~9°/® bled, omits ~ hiflue: 4S a g0°/® ~ilvcrthosna: 52.69°/® ~a~ake Iltiwer: 2~4 Snov~ass~~lildcat: 2S4 ~tea~cnl~at: ' We assist the raara,Y hS service. 'h'aos; 2S°/® vrer~ ~~~~catfon and r~s~ ~'elfluride: Il37 district provides the affibulance but volunteers drive and ~'etoan ~Iillage: Vaifl: 4Il Il Minter Park: ~uag ~ y®~~ ®~~H~a~~ ~n~et~ Asgen: $ 300,000 Avon: $ 873,000 co~~g nRen.: $ 2so,oo0 Ca~s~d ~ $ 230,000 ~~flon: $ 270,®00 Fgasso: $ 3s4,830 Jackson: $ 26s,800 Ke4~hua~: $ 300,000 AO$h g,ak~3: $ 8s0,000 e 5900,000 Park Caty: 5 fl,427,000 flt~ Itaecr: $ 89,000 Rid, ~~Ihi~ ~ l~flia~: $ ? 3ilw~thorn~: $ 370,29fl Snaky fltav~: $ 300,000 Snovvnzass~~lil~aB: 5 436,000 Stboat: $ 460,0 'Taos: ' S 300,000 'T~Bon ~lilla~e: $ ? Mail: $ 993,887 Wfn~r $ 249,000 mat ~ y®~ t~t~g~' Aspen: s within the oily fli~its; 9 in out Vying areas Avon: S Cv~.~n' stn.: Cres$~ed ~bb$$e: g ~E~oII: g IDris~o: ~ Jackson: ~Cetch~: ~ Afia~oth ILakes: 4 'ark City: ~ fl ~tiwer: S ~Ihite ~ fl3flue: ~ within fl000° ®f ~ hydrant; 9 aflfl other ~ilvegthorne: 3 ~na~e mover: s ono s~~i&dc~t: 4 Stea~hoat: 6 '8'aos: g ~'elfl~de: ~ e~ithin areas with hydrants, 9 ~ ~0 in out flying areas ~'eton ~Iiflflage: ~ ~Iaifl: s ~ Iflist~gct ~ qty ®per~ted Depa~°tntent9 Aspen: ~asta~ict Avon: R~taoacipa.~ City ~'ia~ ~t Copper Alan.: 3p~ia~ II~is~rict C~st~ ~ ~istri6t I)iffi~: ~p~~l Distaact Fris6o: II~ist~i~t J~kkso~: ~;oa~bination: fl/2 County; Il/2 City. Il~~t~;haa~: City opea~t~; Contact with the I)istgict. oth ~k~s: S~ciaY District Il'arrk City: Dis~xi~t Iltivcr: City C~bg ~Ihitc ~ l8fluc: Distaict 3iflvcgthoa~: District Sns~c Iltiv~: Distsact Snoass=Waflt: ~p Distgicg 3 Ilt: Cnt~? '~aos: City ~'~flllu~is~: District ~'cton ~Iic: Dis~ict ~IaiIl: City ~Alint~ ~asP~: II~istr<ict Ashen: Faxes ~vo~: ll~ro wathan the ~'o~a of ~ivon, Sales 'Il'ex. . Copper . Crested ~ lFa~,~~rty Anibulan~ Calfls IDalflon: l~ro Rent ~ ~,a~ the Apartn~aent; Fees l~ tea,. out of I)astract ~flls. Frasoo: IPsoperty Tax; Fecs from trail'ic accidents in no moan's lead Jackson: Property Il niilfl an Coaanty; ~'ov+n, sales . l~etchuffi: Caty general contract. fees R~rafl Distract and Ambulance Dasta~act. R/IlaBnanoth Lakes: ~a~~,~:al,~ ~'ax = 80'/0; Filln~ Fees, Interest, and 13L.A~1/Forest Servace funds. Park Caty: Pao 'Il'ex = 98%; Impact Fees and ('wants. Red Coaxabanatioaa of State Faa~ Fund tax; City salts tax; and ~S fiends 1~oaffi the State. . Red, ate ~ Tae: Faoperty Sale orne: ~ ~'ax . Saaake River: ,1~ ~~g 'Il'ex Sno Wafldcat: I~opr S boat: Sales ~'ax ~'aos: RTo 7fax F ;Fund Raising drive oa~ce per year and Fuads from the State Fim 's ~'ellurade: ~'ax and Impact Fees Teton ~I~Ila~e: boy T~ and ~ find wising letter that is sent out each yeas. Vail: Combination o~~r..~;,.i,~ and Sales T'ax; ~rancise Fees. Minter ]Park: ]Property ~'ax and S~iafl o 'p taxes. Do g~oaa have a spr~flde~° ordlnanc~? ~ yesy lao~ many square feet9 ~tc°? . Aspen: Yes, ~C, fl 8,000 square feet. Any structure two stories in height and containing five apartments must be .,a,.~.klered Greater than 6;000 square feet. Greater than five minutes from the fare stataon. Avon: ~lorking on ghe adoption of the fl99fl ~C. ~vely~ units or more must be sprinklered. Currently using the 1983 ~C. . Copper A/ltn.: RTo Crested butte: Riot Specifically, we follow the L1PC. Dfllon: Yes, Any building greater that 3,500 square feet, more than 20 units to a building, or more than three stories tall must be spa~klered. Frisco: Modified 1992 LJF'C; Greater than 50 occupants; Greater than two stories; Cra~eater than fourteen units; some requirements for aarbaaa/wiYdland interface. Jackson: Anything greater thaw 5,000 square feet has to be sprinklered. Ketchum: Yes, Greater that 6,000 square fact. L11~C A1Lammoth Lakes: Greater thane 3,000 squaa~e fleet. Park City: Yes, Trying to standardize it District wide to include ski patrol shacks; C;reater than 6,000 square feet; Greater than 8,600 fret above sea level. Iced River: RTo, we are currently trying to have one adopted. Iced, white ~ Blue:' Yes, we follow what is required in the TJBC and LJF'C with a special wildland mitigation section included. Silverthorne: RTo Saaake River: ~C Snowmass-~laldcat: Yes, Grater than 3,000 square feet. Steamboat: RTo, we have a fire alarm retrofit ordinance that was completed in 1992 'L'aos: Yes, RSA flOfl refd~d~ce to.coaYamercial s ers 'Tellua~ide: i7nder ~98g ~C; plus ~ policy 1988 requiring sP~~~B the building doesn't fit ceatain peraffieters. ~y covenant required t~ sprinkler ~nrithin the ski area. 'Eaton Tillage: ale use the Counties. Anything greater t~ x,®00 square feet nos tm ~ sprinklered. Nail: Rio. VVe have addressed at though. i7nder building code to e~~~ s er. i~linter Park: Minter Park follows tl~e 1991 ~JFC; Frazer follo®vs the ~97b ~JFC; beat. there as aao cock for ttie vest of the I3istrict. ' Il?oes ~®garr ~`ige l~Ia~haIl w®a~~k Y®~ the ~ist~e~~ the Asgen: Dasta~ct Avon: To~a?n Copper Ah[tn.: Distract Crested I3aatte: Dastg~ct Dillon: ~'he Distract staff dots all of tla,e Fire Marshafl's vrork. Frisco: District Jacksoga: DepartgYaent ]~etclauna: Done by flee Fare Chief egad Staff ' Roth Lakes: Assistant Chief as the Five A/larsbal Park City: Distract; T'he Chief ~ualdiaa~ Official as also the Fart marshal. ' Iced haver: ale leave a volaanteer Fart R~arshal. Ike has the saapport of the Fire Chief. Iced, ~Ihite ~ I~flue: Distract Silveg~thhogne: RTo. We leave a paid ire prevention officer. Snake haver: Fare Inspector/Fare Prevention Ofl~acer. Sno~ass~~lildcat: Distract Staboat: ~'o~rra 'L'aos: 'I'o~ga ~'elflurade: Fare as part of flee Assistant Chaefs,yob. Plan revaevdrs and anspectaons. 'L'eton ~Iallage: Faa~ Chief den Sutton loan Jacckson acts as oast Fire l~iarshal. Mail: down ~Iaaater Park: Fare Chief as the Fire Marshal - ffia~~ s4~t~®ns Y®a~° Y~ls p~ haves Asgcn: ~~Pe~ ~ o~ ~ Avon: ~ C®ppes Ran.: Il fisted ~ 2 d~i~®mm: 2 ~a~soo: ll J~~n: 4 Ke~h~: 2 (3~tion 3 as undue constt~tion) oth Yokes: ~ Pik Carr: 4 Yted Ytae~: 2 Yted, ~IJha~ ~ ]~Yru: 3 3alve~tho~: 2 S ]t~ave~: ~ Sn®~ass=~1Va~t: Il Sty 2 ~'aos: ~ ~'ella~ade: ~ Teen ~1' e: Il Vaall: ~ Wing Pull: 2 Wha4 d of fatfos are provided ~ each of statlons~ Aspear: Rf~eeting Room, ®i~iccs. Avon: ®~rces, ®ne Station has a class room. Co~~,~x Qccs, ant Butte: Two efficiono~r apartments, large Community Room, Volunteer IL,ounge, ®ffices. IDillon: Il. Work out room, I~ayfl'raining Room, Kitchen and oi~ices. T ' ' Romm, ®ne 2 Il3edroom Apartment. . Frisco: CoBaf~~ M.Lce, Training, Recreation, Atliletic Rooms; Kitchen; Four A ants; ]Eight offices; Full Shop Jackson: ®ffices, RReeting anti T ' ' Rooms l~etchum: ~cercise Rim, Training Room, IDowms, Kitchen oth I[.akes: Weight Rooiwi, ~onf.,..,~.ce R...,.?., ahowcrs, Full Slccping arcs, Full Kitchen, IDfficcs, IDi,~ center. ''raining Tower Park City: ~tai:ons have dorms, living areas, heJshe showers, kitchens . ~d weight looms Red River: Il. Mass Room, S Kitchen, and maces. bone Red, Whyte ~ ~liie: 1. ShO~, dices, TTaiIIing ROOnl, ~:Onfdt'~.~e ROOffi, Bedroom, Recreation Room, and laundry R®offi. S ,small office, bathroom aS , O~ice, Srlvewthorne: II)ay Roown, ' ' laalion maces Snake Romer: Il. T ' ' Room, ®ffices, ®ffice Space for Rent ~ention ice, ~tuik Room, Training Room, and Weight room Sno Wilcl~at: ®~ces; Conf~w.ce, Traaining, Il.arrndry, dt Weight Rooms, ],ruing . . Full kfltchen, dunk Room, ~1} 2 apartment, (2) one boom ants, (6) Studio Apartments, Stowage Rims for c~ch Itemre,~.tion facilities. ~t~anfl~ag: b. AR~ting Rooms, ®ffic~s 3 ~oa~s and ICa~luan Taos: fl. ~ ants; meeting, ~;onfo~n~, ~ ~cs~ation Itoo~s; T ' ' Tom. Il ant done Teflfla~ide: Il. ~;onf Room ~ffiees 2. A~ tiag Itooan Ton ~Iiflflage: 3n~1 T ~Taifl: ~otbi have on duty quarters, kitchen, flocker rooms, living roo$n, ®~6e,4, Smaflfl 6o11f:.e~vuCe ro0ffi3, and Student quarters. ~intea~ fl'ark: D. 2 flooms with a shaved batbr~oozn; ~oofl roor~a ~ ooYns vrith 2 bathrooaus ~?o y®~ haws any Ili~?~ffns ~esi~entffi~' ~ s®9 h®~ ffianyY Assn: RTo Awon: ~ i Student d~esidents working on their dire S6ience degrees at C~ Cogs~er k~ltu.: ~ Crested ~ ~ Y~iflflon: ~ ~sidents iiwe in file Subdiwasion Station i~ris~o: ~ the aunty AmbuY~nce uses the other tvvo rooffis Jackson: moo. Ketchuffi: 2 ofin IC,al~es: ~ ~araffiedi~ 3 on a day ~tatfon . Park City: ®niy their shifts ~ted bier: moo. ®niy tlu reai busy taffies do we bunk fire fighters at the nation. Red, ~Ihite ~ Niue: moo. Siiw e: ~ mincers S fl~iwer: ~ ~ Sno s~Wnidcat: ll® S Il sight now, but seen haws ~ ~'~s: 4 fi , ~ hers ~'eIlIlurade: a~To ~'eton ~liilsge: i~o Tull: ~ ffit each s~atu®~. each haws their ® r®oYn Wing Il. 6 an l~raser a in he • Il?® y®~ I~a~e ®aea°niglag ~acilaties ff®a° west pars®n~el°~ Aspen: RIo Avon: Can ~ rooffi for theffi. Capper Rh[tn.: ~o ,`rested ~ Rflo L)ifllon: Rfo I+risco: one living are~i is left open for volunteers or others Jackson: RTo I~et6hunn: 2 A~ffioth bakes: for on daaty Paramedgcs Park Cfty: It's possa~le to naa~ke arrangennents for others to stay. ' Iced Itgver: des Iced, ~Ihite ~ Iiflue: RTo Sgflverthorne: RTo 3a~ake River: ~e dunk Iced gnoss°~Iafldcat: ®aae fed, would have tm share a rooffi with the on duty edge or sleep on the hide-a-bed iaa the day roo~a 3teaanboat: RTo 'L'aos: Where are couches to sleep on gn the ftoard rooms 'I'efllurade: 1~To Teton ~Tgflflage: Can find arrangements gf we low you've coffigng. ~Iagfl: Rflo Minter Park: rtes ~'ha8 ~ ~®~a? ffi~be~° ®f h® ~uipQaent ffia~ y®~ l~ave~ Asg~aa: Aflfl ~uipanen~ is houses. Avon: 9. Cog A~~.: s Cre~te~ ~u~: s I)ilflo~: 4 FrisEO: 4 Ya~kso~: 2~ ~~~huffi: ~ lxio~h %s: Il 6 Par} Caty: 23 kt~d Raver: 6 Rcd, white ~ ~Ilu~: Il S Saflverthorne: 9 Saute Rave: 9 Snorn~ass~V~afl ~ Steaant~o~at: fl2 Taos: 9 Tella~ide: ll~ Tetoaa ~Iafllage: 3 ~laafl: 9 W ~uP~: ~ I~®~ ~an~ a a/~a~ ?~~~?~Y Asp~~: 4 Aw®an: 9 ~ ~ II~afl&~: 3 Il ~ 9 K~h~a: ~ ®~Ft 4 ~dl Y~r~: Il 3i~ ~ Sam ~ln&tt: ~ S ~ 'g'am: ~ ~'eflfl~: ~ ~1' ~ ~1~: 4 Il ~awo~: Il fin.: fl Il~ Il ~aYflo~: lE Il ~~kso~: ~ 2 IlCh~a: Il oth lC,~k~s: 3 Il'ark Cad: 2 Il~d ~nv~: Il Yom, Whiff ~ ~1~: Il Sfflv~ho~: Il ~ Ytav~: Il ono VVil ~ 3 ~ 'B'elfl~ad~: ~ ~'~oan ~Inflla~®: Ilrdo~ ~ Sao bud ire have o ~ 65` ~1~: ~ Wanes ~'uk: 2 I~®~ ~~ny ~r~~~ ~c~~ic~a d® ~~n ~naveIl' fin: fl Av®mm: Il l~ffi.: ~st~ ~ ~n?fl®~n: ~ Il ~ I~c~ha~n: Il ®ah mss: Il fl'uk Cfl~y: ~dl fltav~rr: Il 'te ~ ~1~: fl Savo Il S Iltnw~e: Il Sn® Wafld S ~Il ~'~s: Il ~lufl: ]P 1 I~®~ ffi~ny st~~ ®~hi~a ~d® y®e~ A~oIIn: ~ 8 ~ fl~ Il ~iYflomm: ~ ~riseo: Il (curb tta~t ~ be used for bike path accidents) ~ac?cson: 4 Keacflnuna: Il oth ~.akes: 3 ~u'k City: ~ IEted ~iwer: Il ~ fl3flue: 9 3 I~.iwer: ~ 3n® ~lifldc~t: S ~ ~'~os: ~ ~'eflfluride: ~ ~'eton ~Iiflfl~ge: ~l~ifl: Minter dark: ~ ~'flaat ®tflne~ deflni~fles do ~®n have tflaat we ~almmat c®ver~ Aspen: Il ~rusla 'ruck Avoca: Copper Attn.: Crested l8utte: fl ~uipment 'T'ruck I~afllon: Il ~ A1~ina Pumper ale Douse a.laazardous materials response vehicle but ~t doesn°t belong to us. Frisco: Il ~'ankea~ ~acksoaa: ~ 3 ARini Pumpers 6 Grass Fire 6 X 6 ~ 'I'ankeas Ketchum: fl 'I'asaker & Paunper/'I'aalcer on order Aft~amoth Ickes: ll goa,dcr fl ~'ractor Il small Engine 2 Pag~~ade i~ebicles Park City: Il ~'ataker 6 Eraash trucks 2 Sno~rplows Iced River: D Inrush 'ruck Iced, F~Thite ~ blue: Il ~nl truck Silv~rthorne: Il ~lildlagad Itig Snake Itsiver: Il Wal 6 ~ 6 Sno WaIldcat: fl ~Jtility 'ruck Il ~ d Car S Z ~ ~rusfln ''rucks Il Tyr Il fl~~ Rcscaac Taos: ll Il fl~ ~ Tcflfl~i~: Il ' ' fl~~r ll Air Saappfly Truck ~ Antics fl?irc Appara4aas ~ Q~ Air ~oaffi ~a?4ication Tctoan ~IiflflaSc: Il Scflua~rush Truck ~Iaifl: Il dous A~Zateriafls fltcsponse Vcilicflc Wiaatcr Park: ~ T /ihlfldlan~ - do you ge4 yourr eflB ~ l~ Stations o~ ow® storage faciflityo ern: district fought Coamty/qty ~s Stations Avoca: ff--;~~~ the dater ~istwictt l~tn.: Stati®~ ~n~,4ted fl3utte: local district Frisco: ale have a with the 't'own. We fuel ~ at the 'd'own Shop ~acksoan: 'flue IVlaj~xg®~r is purchased through the T'®w~. ~e also serFrl~ stations have above gr®und storage. Ketchum: ~C~B~~tly we have a lock at the local gas s:,~;on. oth s: ~e have our own storage facility. I~aak pity: a gr® concrete IRedI gtiver: ~e get Dear diesefl flied, F~Ihite ~ fl~l~: .Froffi the 'own of fl3 'dge ~iflverthorne: fl'g~~ the 'own der: l~roan the tanks Sno s°~lildcat: We have own storage S , We have a 6r,ax~act with ~lestetn ®il and sae issued key cards. ~'aos: Seavice Stations ~'efll We have o~ owa~ Tillage: Ic~n.~~ the Skn y gas stowage fail: We fuel up aE the ~'®wn Fleet Nlaintew~nce Sh®p. ~linte8 Fark: We have Dear ®wn . ~Ih® dog 4h~ ffi~intenffi®ce ®n Y®nP ap~t~tns~' ~1e do all off ours. We have certified nacchanics and r are laid f®r thcir tom. Avon: ~c~ ~ the Right . V61e contract out the k~tn.: ~1e do the flight maintenance. iifle ~,.i~act out the heavy fliutte: l~a~=~'e fl)illon: ale do 90'/® off it imm house. Itf' at is something nsajor, we ~rilfl 6~e~au~ct it ®~at. Trisco: ~ main 'cian does 95°/® of it. ale contract out the ~acksorn: ~Ve do the light ce. We contract out the heavy . ce. flCetchuffi: ale ~o tl~ light maintenance. ale contract ®ut the R~ea`ry - ~ locally. oth lL,akes: ~e have a ffiechanic. dark pity: We do the ' or maintcnance. DVe c.,.di~act out the heavy ~ sett i.al~ ~;ity. flied fl~nver: We do aRR ofthe small maintenance things an house. 'The Fleet e does all of the major ~tsings. flgedl, ~lhite ~ l~Rue: ~ nntj~~~i,~ is done in house. 'The rest is c.,~t~~cted out. Silo offne: ~e have a d technician. Snake IE~ives~: ~e have a ' tenance technician. 3n® sO~liRdcat: We have a laid main ~~~r that does they can. VVe ~n~~ out the major to T®~. S We do the minor maintcnance. 1~e contract out the heavy ' tc to the Ptablic V~o~ ~ ~'~os: ~ anost ®f the main Vile ~.,,~ir~.ct ®ntt the heavy mein Teflluai~: ~Te do ffiost of the amain an house. ~l~ 6.~n~uL.~.E:t ot~t the heavy to the l~blic V~lorks ent. ~'eton ~ills~e: We most of it. IIf ~ can't, ~ send it to the '~'ovr+n of Jackson or a 'ce n&on. fail: ~°he &'leet ' tenance Sta~does it alfl. 0 Minter Pam: ~ ~pany coffies in to ~ flee engines, ions, hydraulics, IIl~a ~ II?o y®u t~~s~®~ ~atflen~~ Aspen: loo, there is a tax sua.~,~.~ed ambulance that is run by Pitkin County An~buflance Service. Avon: Igo, there is a tax supported aarabulance that is roan by the Eagle County Aaaabulance Service. C..a?~a c~s~ed ~utt~: Y~~ I~i11on: Frisco: ~To Yaekson: ~o ~Cetchuan: Yes A/ia~oth Lakes: Rio ' Park Cfty: RTo Red ~tiver: Yes Yte~, ~fhfte ~ lSfleae: ~o as a generafl male, but if the County ambulances are busy our res6ue unit ban. Siflvea~ttaorne: RIo Snake ~tiver: Pdo Sno~nass~~lafldcat: Yes Steaffiboat: I~To ~'aos: RTo T'eflfluride: , . Yes 'i'eton ~Iillage: 1~To ~Taifl: l~To, Eagle County 1~mbulance Service does our transports. V~linter Fark: 1~To a~b~nees ~®n hade~ Av®~: C~s~l ~ ~ house o~ affibulas~ce f~ County. ~sekson: ~e~hu~n: ~ oth II.akes: ]Peak ® . lEte~ 2 ~Ihite ~ ~llue: res unit can ~a~nsporB if County ambulances are busy. make ono ~lilcit: 2y ale ~ ~ ambulance during Il992=1993 ski season. S ~'a.os: ~'elluai~: 3 ~'eton ~Iillage: Mail: ]Peak: We house two affib aad one search/rescue t but ire ~ not ~ as ~ 'on of the Distaict. I~®~v ®an~ ~~II'°s c~® y®~a have ®n deg~ar~em4~' Aspen: fl Avon: 2~ Copper l~fitn.: ~ fisted Il3iatte: 20 Diflflon: Il ~ Fresco: Il~ ~acksoan: ~ fl s Ketcham: 20 oth makes: 6 Fark City: ~Jnknown Red River: 22, and the rest are trained to ~ first responder fle~refl. Red, ~Elhite ~ >3flaae: 22 D's Siflverghorne: 9 Sna?ce River: 20 3noss°V~lafldeat: ll6 ms's, Sonac of which are Defibrillation Ccrtafied 2 '~YV's Steaffiboat: 9 ' ms's } Il 3 First Responders ' Taos: 3 Teflflaarade: ~ Teton Viflflage: Il ~laifl: Aflfl ffi are F.1~T°s of soffie flevefl. Aflfl paid staff are EA~T~D's ~li~ter Fark: ll2 0 Il~®~ nanny ~dvnn~~ Il~~ snpp®~8 pea~sonneY d® ~y®n ~aave ®n y®n~ ~ep~en4~ Assn: 0 Avon: 0 Copes l~~a.: 0 Cr~s~ 13iat~e: ~ I)ifllon: fl IF'aasoo: 4 ~~kson: ~ Il~~t6Fnt~: fl2 Aogh bs~os: fl0 Puk Ca~gr: lUaakno~rn Ilt~ Iltav~r: ~ P~i~s S In~an~daa~s IZ~, lh~flai~ ~ Il~fl~: S Si9voanc: fl0 Sna~~ l~veY: ~ Sn s~~lal 4 P acs g Ynedia~s Sanfl fl 'Il'~os: fl - 'P~lflnga~: 9, one an 'fl'~ton ~I' 0 ~I~fl: 0 Wanes Il'atfl~: 6 d 0 0 ~o y®~ ~n~ ot~~p co~naen4~ angge8tio~ that I ~onYd add to t6ia ~na~?~~ Aspen: ~Ie are ~ our woluatecr status. ~it~ Prevention is ley A~omi: mill send y®~ our annual report. Vile and ' all of our fighters through the b?ivision of Fire Safety. ~o ~ is butte: loo l~illoan: ~e a~ doing a lot of consolidating and joint ef~'~g ~s here in S 't Q:ounty. IFrisco: ~o ,tk~nnaents ~aclrson: loo ~ ~ Ketchum: II would liYce ~ see more contact resort departments. , yl~e a ne~rsletter so that ire could share infoamation and ideas. II would be to Delp. oth Teo Pam Q:itt~r. ~o ]it,~l Derr: ~e aae to implement a paramedic care service for minor injuries don°t require a It will tam a mile before ig n~ imm plain b~ at looks l~ ' II~edl, 'te ~ blue:. ]No Sil~i Dane: ' ~o S ttiw~r: ~o Sno ~lild~t: S ~o ~'~s: Pao ~ tl C~ O 'g'~lla~rad~: F~Io~Yd ~ak~ tt~ s~trollcd ~roe~ln. tee: ~o ~ @~nn~r Park: ~~r 4ovver bas ~ ~aod send. ®V~ bae~ sostalled ~ ~~A v a~ D ~'o®ld lilcc ~ c®py ®f this sn~cy ~*hcn it hay lawn campleted? - - All en 'cts Y spot ~?i~ta would like a copy of this i~ as Wished. , a ~ ~ ~n°=.~ E~flu~eati®aaal ~ H®gticuflt~aafl l'r® raguas ~ a o 0 a M ~ A Docent Program, organized this summer by Ken ' ' r~;' , - ; ; Slump, offers public guided tours of Betty Ford Alpine V p,. ~ Gardens on Saturday mornings from 10:00 a.m. to noon. Annual Support, October 1,1992 to September 30,1993 Tours for garden clubs and conference groups continue to be . ` ev; offered by appointment. annual ~iftS Sustaining Members Robert & Karen Barker Jeanne O'Dwyer John k Amy Rassman, A member benefit the 1993 Seed Exchange offered 40 Gifts from $100 to $149 Helen 13 Bird Mark Oliff Rassman Design ' ' Annual membership Susan R. Black Michael k Marie Orlin Nan Rondeau K~ , species of Rocky Mountain plants, includin seed collected cy & Lu Allen ry g includes gi f is f t'om OefOber Mrs. Vem Anderson Mn k Mrs. Mike Boettcher Rebecca Oliver Peter H. Rudy ,f i from our garden. Also, 21 species were offered through a 1,1992 to September 30, Mr. & Mrs. Robert Bayless Boldt ~ Schneeberger Richard dr Ginny Olson Safeway M.~' «•7a ~ Susan Boyd Della & Fred Otto Maureen & Les Shapiro ~ donation from VAGF Swedish member Ingemar Bjork, 1993. We regret any errors Mr. & Mts. Gordon G. Britton plan D. Bradshaw James Osterfoss, Jane & Phi] Smiley r Debra & Mel Brod rc%'~'~% rM : ~ Nancy Rondeau presented a horticultural panel, "Ask an or omissions. Y Barbara & Dolph Bridgewater The Roost Lodge Sitzmazk Lodge ~ ,y4` ~ „ Doris L. Buthman Linda Broughton M.B. Pazks S nn Valle Greenhouse > ~ ~ Ex rt at the be nnin of arden season. Landsca P a Y ~ t ~ ~ ~ ' ~ g g Mr. & Mrs. George Cannon Gayle 6r Jce Brower Hensley Peterson Dan Telleen, Karats ~ - ~ designer Sherry DorWard and landscaper "Ziggy" GOSIeWSkI Lynn Chapin Tom & une Brown Fred & Wanda Plagens Vail Printing & Office Supply r Benefactors Mr. & Mrs. John Clark Cce DorothJ Y. Burks oan Potter fielded questions about design and gardening techniques for sifts of$15oo or more Y 1 Vail Valley Tourism & - Colorado Ganien Mr• & Mts. Jack R. Crosby Mr. dr Mrs. Sidney Bums Mary & Dick Pownall Convention Bureau x ~ r ~ > , interested gardeners, Nancy and Marty Jones gave two Ginny Culp WilBam Campbell, M.D. Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Pyle Vail Village [nn ~ & Home Show Summer garden Workshops for Our VOlllriteer gardeners. Mr. & Mrs. Andy Daly Ben dr Mary Jean Chaney John & Deborah Rasmussen West Vail Li or Mart ~ t ~ Mr. & Mrs. Robert Deming Gail Day Diane Choate Janet & Bill Rey Kathryn Wheeler b ~ A photography workshop, sponsored jointly with Denver Bill & Adele Douglas Paul K. Conner Mr. & Mrs. Peter Richazds Adel & Homer Williams L nda Goldstein Harvey & Jill Denman k a Botanic Gardens, used the flowers of Bett Ford Al ine Y Marll cranin PatriaaRickman The Yarn Shop , y p Drs. Fred & Ines Distelhorst ~ Jerry Fotd Invitafiona] Frances Davies Bert Sanders Ken Youn tram r'- ~ Gardens as subject and background. Instructors, Tim Hebert Golf Tournament Mc & Mrs. Morgan Douglas Mary & Ralph Davis Lynn Savalas Art Zubien~i and Mar ones, tau ht techni ue and closeu hoto a h Maud & Ben Duke ~ . ~ ; ~ ty J g q p p gr y Robert Lashbrook Jim & Ludlle DeMoor Alva Schloss - Don & Emilie Egan t0 both Denver and Vail pdrtlClpantS. & Pierre Mooney Cathy Dolan Joan & Gene Schwarz ~ ` ' Mr. & Mts. Richard Liebhaber Widge Ferguson Mrs. Robert E. Dawning Maztha & Catherine Seiler • ° • Mikki Futernick Memorials & Tributes F. ' m.E• DonnaEfimofF GertrudeSh - _ Donald P Ross, Jr, arp Benefits Ron & Pat Terwilliger Dolores & Dick Gadomski Gail L. Ferry Susan Sheridan Volunteers really enjoy their work in the Gardens. Ann R tti (ri ht) is Barbara & Arnold Goldbur Donors of these gifts have ~ g ' Town of Vail 8 Elizabeth Foster Kenneth W Slump sometimes mistaken for Betty Ford by visitors. 'Winter Interlude, our holiday benefit concert and James & Mary Hesbutgh Carl & Elizabeth Fritch Karen M. Smith been acknowled ed Vail Valley Foundaton g reception, has become well established as a-major event of the George & Lisa Ireland Richard Bc Mary )o Froberg Walter & Eleanor Smith during the year In our books and botanical items, A new BFAG T-shirt was Junior League of Denver John & Linda Galvin Mr. & Mrs. James M. Smith, Jr. winter season, thanks to the work of Chairwoman Jeanne Patrons John & Claudia King Dr. William Gambill, Jr. Mr. & Mrs. Harvey Stack newsletter, Gore Creek designed by Cathy Hebert. The sales were open to the Bailey and many volunteers. We especially appreciate the Gifts from $1000 to $1499 Ella Knox Martha w. seller Sydney Summers Wildf lower, general public as well as to conference participants. participation of President and Mrs. Ford in the evening. Mr• & Mrs. Winton M. Blount Merv Lapin William 6r Judy Geller Barbara Stephenson Mr. & Mrs. Bjorn Borgen Katherine Lawrence Kathe & Michael Gendel Carey E. Talmage Gifts Were Received Perfect weather prevailed for the field Mps and a tour of Christopher Wilkins, Music Director of the Colorado Springs Richard & Barbara DeVce Luc & Liz Meyer, Carol M. Gerritsen WI. & Trudy Thomas In Memory Of: Vail Valley gardens. The success of the private garden tour Symphony, is extremely popular with our audience. Sponsors Exxon Corporation The Left Bank Restaurant Cornelia Gibson Gene Br PeggyUselton Vem Anderson Mr. & Mrs. Robert Fritch, The Lodge at Vail Nancy & Jim Gibson Frank & Karen Van De Water Richazd Burks may provide a prototype for next year's Vail Valley Festival of (A Special Friend of the Gardens, FirstBank of Vail, and Slifer, The Sitzmark Lode Solange G. Cignac Ellen K. Waterman Flowers. P th p g Dc Joseph T McFadden Lynn Gottlieb Karin & Bob Weber Margaret Gossip Chapin Smith & Fram ton), e rece tion host (Radisson Hotel), the Mr. & Mrs. George Gillett Eva Blake Otjen Nita J. Griffin Douglas M. west Franklin L. Clinebell wine resenters (West Vail Li uor Mart and Kobrand Gloria Gilliland Carla & Steve Cuarasdo Jean Whitmore Loys Denton p q John S. Palmer ohn Foster Vail Valley ~estieal ®f Floavers Kathryn & Steve Haber Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Pierce Ed Gund, Noel Adel Williams J D. Deane Hall, Jr' Susan & Ivan Popkin Dorn Harrison Hans Woldrich John Cwinn, M.D. The Lodge at Vail received the Grand Prize Trophy as the continued on page 8 Martha Head Warren & Helga Pulls Burgette Hart Ken & Cindy Youngstrom Judge Harry S. Hill Foundation & Evelynn Harnsberger, Sr. outstan ing garden in the Vail Valley. Engraved silver Revere George & Joy Rathmann Mr & Mrs. Richard Hart Sandra Younts Peggy McCoy Hughes Mr. & Mrs. Donald Herdrich Ann Repetti Jack & Marion Harvey bowls were awarded to first place gardens in four classes: corns W McGraw Fonndaton Harriet Ha es Arthur B. Jones Po ' Byron & Sally Rose Y Special Contributions Joi Johnson Kilpatrick Residential -Patricia Terwilliger; Hotels & Commercial w - , Mrs. John Mc[ntyre Mr. & Mrs. Charles Rosenquist Mr. & Mrs. Robert Heapes Pamela J. Avery, Mrs. Thomas E. Ta Im Carman Heilman Lois Klipp Buildings - Gasthof Gramshammer; Condominium s ~ , P Peter H. Rudy Y Avery Audiences Peter Donald Knoche Julia Love Tuschman Barbara Hibben Associations (anew class this year) -Village Center; Shops 8r Maureen Sha iro Beaver Framin ° p Lee Hollis 8 Chandler Lamb ,fr , ~ Foundation Elizabeth W Slifer Charmayne T Bernhardt Embry Trigg Langon Restaurants - Cafe at the Westin. Alison Hoversten `l8 , ' Y f s . ; x~ ~ ' ' Dela W. White Mr. & Mrs. Robert Smedley Michael Billingsly, Maz Lawrence x} YF,' The Wren Assocation Barbara & Charles Hussey Rock Mountain Resorts Y "Vail: Valley of Flowers;' started in 1987 to recognize ~ ~ Mr. & Mrs. W. R. Stewart Y John McIntyre ~ ~ v f H Husted Network, [nc. outstanding gardens in Vail, has grown into a major summer ~ ~~y ~ 'Y ~ 1i~~ ' ~ Mr. & Mrs. Richard Strauss Intermountam Landscaping, Ingemar Bjork Patrida Ann Mijer w , ° Sponsoring Members Richard & Jean Tally Zi & Ruth Cosiewski Dr. H. M. Mulfly event, this year under the direction of Barbara Devoe, a past 88Y Blossoms Bric-a-brat Frances Maloit Nelson Gif is from $500 to $999 Pearl & Chuck Taylor Gloria Johnson Bolle Elizabeth Maur Black Grand Prize winner. In cooperation with the Vail Valley ~ 8 1 Tom Bosetli ,q,. e, John & Judith An elo Mc & Mrs. ere W Thompson Jill Jones Y ~ Cissy Dobson William H. Todd Laura P. Klem Barbara Pyne Marketing Board, the event was renamed 'Nail Valley Festival : ~ ' ' The cheese shop Mss. Nan R;cn „ au,~ Mrs. Cortlandt Hill Mr. & Mrs. John L. Tyler Mr. & Mrs. M H. Knauss Colorado A] roes ry of Flowers, repositioned inmid-June, and included in Vail's ~ ~ ~ , P Susie Ross Mr. & Mrs. Niels W. ohnsen Mr. & Mrs. osef Staufer, Kathy Langenwalter M Frances Todd ® i J ] Brian Combs summer markeHn ro am. It now rovides a marketin ° ~ ~ ~ rm Stephenson Vail Village Inn Leanne Lestak Lucinda & Andy Daly ~ g p ~ p g ~ t ~ . Mr & Mrs.. Landis Martin Lyn Youngstrom ~ ~ jj ~ ~ ' Oscar Tang Mr. & Mrs. James Viele J Sherry Durward focus to extend Vail's early summer season. , , , 'C ° Anne Colston Wentz, M.D. Frederick & )an Mayer Mr, & Mrs. Richard Eber We developed a new flyer to promote a flower walk a ~ ~ ~ # Mc & Mrs. Michael Mclaughfln Eves Print Shop Gifts Were Received e ? Contributing Members Mr. & Mrs. Robert H. Wilson through Vai] and Lionshead as part of the event in June and _ . Robert & Ruth Metzer Rudi Fisher Architects Iri Honor o ~ , a x a, . Gifts from $250 to $499 George R Wood f ~ Kathleen S. Miles Cathie & Mor an Dou as Mr. & Mrs. amen Zie ler Helmut Frisker to last throughout the summer. Judging of gardens took place ~ , . Suzi Grafton Apple J g Nan Miller 8 ~ cY Linda & Jotm Galvin Betty Ford x' Mr. & Mrs. William B. Collister Darrell C. Miller Galvin p~i~ President & Mrs. Ford inmid-July to allow gardens more time to grow and at a time J ~.p as ~ David & Nora Courier Individual & Carol Minor when publicity surrounding the event is no lop er lost in ~ ~ ' . s; ° Lynda Goldstein Helen Fritch g ~ . . « n, Eagle Valley Community Fund Family Members Jane & Harry Misakian ~ Cosiewski, ,rr s , t BSY Lynda Goldstein Fourth of Jul activities. A 9'~ r oan Flood Mr. & Mrs. Gilbert Mochei y ; . • ~ J Gifts from $15 to $99 Intermountain Landscaping Ellen Waterman ^m, Mr. & Mrs. J. Stephen Fossett Sallyann Aarons Barbara Mooney Cathy Hebert The annual Festival of Flowers, b ular demand, now ` ~ , r . ~ ~ y ]gyp ~ "6A e ' ' >*~7 ohn & Vick Garnse Nannette & Dan Moran 8 Donations in honor of 1 y y Kuby Adams 8 Tim Hebert, Hebert Advertisin includes Minturn, Avon, Beaver Creek, Arrowhead, ; ~ • ~ xaren ~ nn Morten ° ~ Admiral & Mrs. B. R. Inman Jack & Doris Ames J Johnson dr Wales University -`g"~?,•• • .:w'aa.•.:> ~"'°f~ ` ohndrMarikaMouw theirweddin sin the Singletree, and Lake Creek. An honor roll of outstandin ~r ~ _ R,; • . - , ~ Mr. & Mts. Larry Lichliter Jerry Anderson J Marty Jones g g z Christie Murata Bet Ford Al ine gardens was recognized by special garden plaques. ~°~t ~ - , ~ ~ z.~°~ Fern c. Portnoy Mr. & Mrs. A. C. Andrikopoulos Robert Kenney, C.PA ty p Eileen & Fitzhugh Scott Jody Arnold Mrs. Eugenia Myers Lancelot Restaurant Gardens Marty Jones leading a group tour o f the Betty Ford Gardens. Phil & Jane Smiley Mr. & Mrs. R. E. Atha, Jr. Nanry A. Nelson Manor Vai] Lodge William F. Wilson Dennis & Barbara Baldwin Pam Nemeth Alex Mitchell, Mac So]uYons 4 & Dawn S. Smith 5 e • ~ ~ . ~ su ]emented b seasonal labor for heavy jobs and James IvL McCrea, Jr. Erik & Kathy Borgen Dick & Dolores Cadomski Jere & Peggy Thompson A Midsummer Night ; " ' PP Y & Maggie Trummer Lynda Goldstein Jahn & Linda Galvin Howard H: Torgove ~ ~ ? " Y specialized horticultural tasks. Scott Michael & Karen Alexander John R. Hardesty Mc & Mrs. Fred Green Frank dr Karen Van DeWater Sponsors ~ amp' Trish Seidl & Gre Moore Mc k Mrs. James R. Greenbaum Drs. Anne k Dennis Wentz Apollo Ski Partners 8 The Lod e at Cordillera g Lon Jamison k Dan Siefers Mr. & Mrs. Geotge Shaeffer Steve & Kathryn Haber Mc & Mrs. Robert H. Wilson The Sitzmark Lodge I°' 1'lanS ~Or the ;EutUTe Susan Scanlan D. Deane Hall, Jr. Sheila & Joseph 7alldnd Champagne presented by 1 Sitzmark Lodge, west vail ti uor Mart I R Architectural plans for the future visitor center, & Richard Pazachini Helen & Bob Fritch Martha Head Special Contributors q ~ Patrida Cinsbach Mike & Karen Herman shadow creek winery developed by Fisher Architects and Galvin Design, feature a Oscar L. Tang Alpine Data, Inc., & Marvin Silverman Mr. & Mrs. James Hesburgh ~ ' Ken Youn tram Patrons circular buildin covered b the al ine rock arden, with a Town of Vail gs ~ Y P $ Tammy Aul loran Kaylee k Jake Jacobson p~ , Vail Valle Foundation Blossoms Bric-a-brac John & Marlene Boll t ."r Colli and o n to the sk The buildin will include & Tom Carpenter Y Ian Jenks ~ , ~ . ~ ty Pe y g Beth & Chris Broad Silner Patrons Patdaa & Burke Kaplan Champayne Originals, Mr. & Mrs. Gordon Britton , ~ Champayne Bernhardt Bill & Joyce Donlon p x ~ ~ ~ ~ meeting/reception and display areas, an orientation theater, Karin MatLcon & Bruce Keep Mc & Mrs. Niels W. ohnsen Ella Knox J Chateau Vail/Holidaylnn FrrstBankofvail s... ~ ~ library glft shop and staff work space. The building will Mr. & Mrs. Robert Kendall Richard T. & Kristen E. Liebhaber The Cheese Sh Caren & Walter Forbes ~ ' ' Robert & Linda Llewellyn °p ay. ~ V. rovide versatile indoor/outdoor space for community use Winter Interlude Robert Oliver City Market Floral & Gift Shoppe Dorothy dr John Gardner " _ i W P Frank J. Lynch ° ° r~ Colorado Alpines Kathryn & Steve Haber ° ` ,r and rivate social functions from May to October, adding to Sponsors Patrons Harry do Janelle Mathy ~a"~ P Domino's Pizza D. Deane Hall, Jr. s + * a a„ A Special Friend Mr. & Mrs. Anderson Peter & Bazbaza Miller - ° ~ ~ ~ the ambiance of the cultural center that has developed in Ford Eves Print Shop Barbara 8r Julian Hansen a " s F : of the Gardens Jeanne Bailey Edward, Louise & Dorothy Moos ' ° ~ i Park. Thomas Bade Paul & Bet NumeroE Fanry Plants & Flowers Mrs. Cortlandt Hill ~ a FirstBank of Vail Y h' ~ , Gus & Eleanor Bramante Fred & Della Otto M Flower, Inc. John Galt Mountaineerin a Slifer, Smith & Frampton p~~ s Marty & Sandy Jones g I ~ ' The enveloping alpine rock garden, designed by Marty Rec Lion hosted b Mr. & Mrs. Keith L. Brown Alexandra K. Palmer ~ a < ~ ones, will include lams from al ine areas around the world, ep Y Resort Entertainment, Helena Krebs ~ J P P =r Radisson Hotel Tom & une Brown Fem Portno J Y Dana DelBosco Karen Lowenstein alth 'ts focus w 11 be on alpines and subalpines from the - - - - - - - -Sharon Bunch- - -Warren-& Helga I'ulis- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ s ~ . _ Ough l -1 - - - - - - - - - - Wines presented by Radisson Resort Vail, Patfl Welch Joseph T McFadden ~ BiB & Marie Clinkenbeard Dr. & Mrs. A. J. Reed ROCk MDUntain re Ori. West Vail Liquor Mart Vail Assodates, Inc. David & Kristin Robbins Safeway Mr. & Mts. Fitzhugh Scott m y Kobrand Corporatlon Sitzmazk Lodge Maureen Shapiro ,i A conceptual interpretation plan, developed for the Gail Day Byron & Sally Rose ~ , , ~ 'a Gold Patrons Ines & Fred Distelhorst Peter Rudy Westin Resort, Amy Phillips Jane & Phil Smiley 9 a a Board b Team Inte relation, includes interactive computer VaB Assodates, Inc., Frank & Karen Van DeWater a~ " ~ Y FP Tod er & Ma Ellen Catherine E. Douglas Mc & Mts. Leslie Shapiro : s 8 rY Ted Ryczek, James Fitz Ken & Cindy Youngstrom w. ` ~ ~ ~ and video technology and innovative displays on horticultual Anderson Mr. & Mrs. wrlliam C. Douglas Leonard & Lois Sharzer r~. a• s H. Ben'amin Duke, Jr. Mc & Mrs. C. Philip Smiley Vai]'s Little Flower Shop ~ 'aa ~ ~ , , ° dr; and plant-related environmental topics. Michael & Susan Bloomberg I Vai] Valley Foundation ° Cissy Dobson Robert & Sallie Fawcett Jean & Richard Tally Village Market Marty )ones and Nancy Rondeau instruct volunteers in the care of Mc & Mrs. J. Stephen Fossett Marilyn M. Fleischer Pat Terwilliger Founders Mutual Funds, Richard & Marilyn Foster Walter & Kris Thomas Beffy FOrlt Atytrie Gardens. - The Summer of `93 Horticultural Programs & Special Events i ~ n ~ i ~ I ~ rt f r t r G g ~ Spring came late to the Gardens this year following heavy winter snows. Snow crocus and Snowdrops, earliest ARCS Rocky 1VTotmtain Rendezvous 1 of Flowers to appear in the alpine display garden, usually The American Rock Garden Society held its annual Where l ~ C®rnes fr® appear the last week in March. This year the Gardens were meeting, "Rocky Mountain Rendezvous," in Vail June 24-27, still under two feet of snow, and it was the end of April bringing an international group of almost 500 people to the Benefit Events (14.6%) Membership (14.8%) before the snow melted and the first flowers appeared. Westin Resort. They came to see Betty Ford Alpine Gardens Within ten days, the alpine display garden was snow free, and wildflowers of the surrounding mountains. Betty Ford and our volunteer gardeners began work on May 10. welcomed the group in an opening reception at the Gerald R. In-Kind & Other (9.2%) The beauty of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens is maintained Ford Amphitheater. Memor111S & Indlvjdual through the dedicated work of our garden volunteers, under Events of the weekend included field trips, a botanical art \ Capital Campaign the direction of Nancy Rondeau. Their work is show and sale, alpine plant sale, and a gift shop with garden i Contributions (20.8%) ~ ~ Vail Alpine Garden Foundati®n Charter 11~e>rnbers Government Grants (14.4%) Pro ram Wid e Fer uson Dr. Anna & William Loeffler ;:>:»>~:s»»:: Charter Member g $ $ Ca ital Cam ai n ( P P 9) , . Mr. & Mrs. Robert McConnell FtrstBank of Vatl err ad is _ r have rn e embe s arfer m Ch 8~f . ..'~`~~:~i~z3i::ii°`"~~~~~~~ des totalin 2500 or mare or the President & Mrs. Gerald R. Ford Curtis W. McGraw Foundation Foundation & Corporate (26.3%) (Capital Campaign) ple 8 8 $ f Mr. & Mrs. Robert Fritch Robert Oliver development o f Betty Ford Alpine ~ Dr. & Mrs. Richard Parker Gardens. Because the botanic garden is a Mr. & Mrs. John Galvin uni ue communif asset, the Board seeks Mr. & Mrs. George Gillett The Roost Lodge And Where I t Goes q y Lynda Goldstein Mr. Donald P. Ross, Jr. to encourage wide participation in the Martha Conley Hall Mr. & Mrs. Fitzhugh Scott Charter Member program. Charter , Ira & Nicki Harris Mr. & Mrs. C. Philip Smiley Administration (16.0%) Maintain Gardens (19.6%) I Members will be accepted until the Mr. & Mrs. Howard Head Stanley Smith Horticultural Trust Completion of the Gardens, and pledges Mr. & Mrs. Donald Herdrich Mr. & Mrs. Vernon Taylor, Jr. may be made over mare than one year. Lorraine & Harley Higbie Mr. & Mrs. Ron Terwilliger ~ Mrs. Cortlandt Hill Town of Vail Charter Members Jerry Ford Invitational Golf Tournament John S. Tuschman Jeanne Bailey Mr. & Mrs. Niels W. Johnsen Vail Associates, [nc. Mr. 8r Mrs. Bjorn Borgen Mr. & Mrs. F. Ross Johnson Vail Valley Foundation Colorado Garden Show, Inc. Marty & Sandy Jones Mr. & Mrs. Frank Wells CPS Distributors, Inc. William Jones Mrs. John White Program & Mr. & Mrs. Robert Deming Robert Lashbrook & Pierre Monney Joan Whittenberg Promotion 27.1 % J ~ ' Mr. & Mrs. Richard Liebhaber The Wren Association ( ) Cissy Dobson Nurse Ken & Cindy Youngstrom ry - Little Valle Y Mr. & Mrs. William C. Dou las $ 0 2 ous non m A ) tV' od e a all eL Y Th 7. o n 3/ i 3 n ct o D i n Co stru es & g 'on ) ound h rF a 9 6 3 . ~ ~ a, ' x~, ~ ~)rlle~ )~ll3$®]Cy Ry®¶~~~~~~, Sydney Summers Beth Thompson Plant Sale TerryPvog e,~a ~ „ 1Y 4 Nan Thornton BiB Todd Helen Fritch, Chair Nanry 6r Paul Rondeau ~ Friends of the Alpine Garden was or anized undei the g Deb Worley Gayle dr JceBrower Caroline Sheahan ~ ~ w- ~~s , ~ ° leadership of landscape designer Marty Jones and Helen ~llA Jt' ®~p~ ~ ¶'9¶Sl Gardens Horticultural Staff LuryZimmerman Carol Brown Karen Smith ,.t=~'k ~ ` Fritch as the Town of Vail was developing plans for Gerald R. MariyJones, Athena Buxman Pearl & ChuckTaylor gn p ~ Alpinep~denDirector Gardens Docents Lynn Chapin KenYoungstrom Ford Park. When the Town desi ated a site for the al ine l4 A11 Nicola Ri 1 Ken Slump, chair Mary Davis 3..::.:.~ ' ' r ~ ~ , garden in the master plan, the Friends incorporated in June Jeff Wagner Lynn Chapin Susan Dougherty A Midsummer Night x Mary Davis Anne Eagan Mona Look, Chair v" 1985 as "Vail Alpine Garden "anon rofit cor ration. Board of Directors Gayle &JceBrower ' p ~ Seed Exchange Barbara DeVce Bob Fritch The Board of the Vail Alpine Garden represents both the xonorary Director Nicola Ripley, Director Mary Jo Froberg Libby Harris Mary Davis ~ ~ Betty Ford Vicky Gorney Mary Hughson Barbaza DeVce ' ~ community of Vail and the larger community of Colorado. Audre Humes Dann ohnson Y 0/ficcrs Gardens Volunteers Y YJ ~ Helen Fritch w r ~ ' ~x t , - Denver Botanic Gardens has been represented on our Board Helen Fritch, President Nanry Rondeau, Director Jane Misakian Marty Jones Jane & Dick Hart ~ from the beginning, and Board members have been drawn Katherine G.,.~~.,, Vice President Helen McIntyre, Assistant Helen McIntyre A?iison Miskell Karen Smith y ~ ! Andrew Pierce, Secretary Nanry Amdt Ann Repetti Pearl Taylor i ~ ~ ~ g( 5 from the Front Range as well as the Vail Valley. James Stephenson,Treasurer Shirley Beal Nanry Rondeau ~ r With support from the Vail Valley Foundation, an alpine Dirr~tos Joan Berger Dixie Rudolph Maureen Sha un ~ ' ~ " dis la arden was built in then rm of 1987 at the entrance Jeanne Bailey Jan Berioglia P Vail Valle $ ~ ~ ~ *s 1 ~`M p y g p g Robert Buckley Susan Black Jean & Richard Tally y 1 ~ to the Ford Amphitheater The garden was named for Betty ciss >bb5on Joe Brower ~~s , ~ Ford in 1988 to honor the former First Lady and was Adele Douglas Pat Burtows FeStlval Of ]Flowers ' Lynda Goldstein Dons Buthman Grand Prize Trophy: ~ dedicated in August 1989, when the perennial garden was xa Haber ABce cart t $ ~ ~ The Lod e at Vail ~ completed. The meditation garden was dedicated two years Deane Hall Lynn Chapin t S a ~ later. Robert Kenney Mary Davis ~ First Place Gardens: x $ Robert Oliver Barbara DeVce Residential, Patricia Terwilliger r Three of the four planned gardens in the master plan for Fern Portnoy Cathie Douglas Hotels)CommereialBulldings, ' ~ ~ " ~ Betty Ford Alpine Gardens have been completed, and design Peter Rudy Anne Eagen Gasthof Gramshammer ' _ laps ar 1n Maureen Shapiro Teri Fray Condominium Associations, p e be g developed for an alpine rock garden and Mary Jo Froberg Village Center Condominiums " ..J WandaGlasson V1SItOr Center. Board Committee Chairs . ry ~"w * ShapsJKestaurants,Ccrfe The Betty Ford Gardens inWinter 1993. The Foundation also sponsors Vail Valley Festival of Katherine Borgen, strategic at the Westin Planning & Nominating Flowers and educational and horticultural programs for the Robert Buckley, Vail Town Honor Roll of Gardens Botanic Gardens. Recognizing the mutual interests community. Coundl Liaison of these two gardens at significantly different Robert Kenney,Finmance Residential Gardens Lynda Goldstein, Denver Botanic Julie Allen altitudes, we have agreed to seek opportunities to CardensLiaison Paula Canning Kathryn Haber, Marketing y ~ Margie & Bruce Chapman cooperate on programs that will benefit both ~~$$y ~®rd ~P~~n~ ~~gden~ &PublicRelations BazbaraDeVce institutions. Aliaisoncommitteemeets-quarterly Deane Hall,Pu6lications Rainy&FredCreen Andrew Pierce, Horticulture Kathryn Haber to discuss joint ventures. Through the Betty Ford Gardens "vQ11 will he QS MaureenShapuo,Events Lee Hollis well known in the summer for tts flowers as it is in Mr.&Mrs.PhillipHoversten The Board changed our organization's name to office Staff Mamie Jump p the winter for its skiing." MazcZipfel, connieKnight Vail Al ine Garden Foundation. The new name Development Associate ' _ Melinda Oakley Dorothy Burks, Mary Pownall will differentiate our role as developer of Betty Office Administrator Ann Repetti Ford Alpine Gardens as we continue to sponsor - Ur, _ Nanry Rondeau r •t ~ ° , Gore Geek Wild floruer Staff Mr. & Mrs. Fitzhugh Scott horticultural ro rams which are not directly Chris&JimThompson p g i Sydney Summers, Editor Ma a Walker & T Smith related to the develo ment of the Gardens in Ford ~r ~ ~ Helen Fritd, r ~Y p , ;p ~ • Deane Hall Park, ~vt" CommereialGardens ' $ w' g Bart & YetPs Marketing & Public Relations ,Q Bell Tower Building We each look confidentl to the future and P y ~ ~ ~ ~ Kathryn Haber, Chair Bisho Park eagerly anticipate the completion of Betty Ford t ~ ~ ~ ' Marc Zipfel, ~ ColoradoAlpines Development Assodate ~ Curfin-Hill Ltd. Alpine Gardens. Even as we proceed with k' a ' ~k~~ ~ ~ Jean Tally ~ a ~ Curtin-Hill Sports n , . { Public Relations Director Frivolous Sal's Boutique development of the Gardens, however, we are also • Trmdreath Hebert ;~~"a' , ` e` Y vi~ky Cornet' Nanry Rondeau Pearl & Chuck Taylor The Golden Bear developing educational programs thatbenefit the ` MaureenShapuo RuthCosiewski Karen Smith Beth Thompson The Greens at Arrowhead TICA Adverfisin , community now. ~?j ~ g IIliGraham PearlTa for MarcZi el Jewelry Works qq ~ Rick & Rita Mueller Y ~ Lionshead Miniature Colf T'' z Kitty Gwathmey Lron uare Lod e Look over our activities of the past year, and r Jane Hart Festival of Flowers Judges Winter Interlude ~ g > ~ . ARGS Conference Carmon Heilman Lodge at Lionshead , ~;rf'9 Y Barbaza DeVce, Chav Jeanne Bailey, Chair Manor Vaff help us to create our future, VVe welcome our a , +°F° LyndaColdstein,VailChair CloriaJohnson Cayle&JceBrower Do]oresBackhus Y ° Kath Bo en Marriott Streamside at Vai] artlei ation. g;~ : Y rB Mamie Jump Lynn Chapin Susan Black p p 5 ° , He]en Fritch Shu]ey Kude] Helen Fritch Charmayne Reinhardt McDonalds ~ ' Kathryn Haber, Gift Shop Chav phyllis Mango Brenda Himelfarb Kath Bor en Montaneros , ° % ~ ' ~ Deb Burkland Ruth Moran Nanry Knill Suzi Brenden Plaza Lodge g 1 E; ,,0 - ~ ~ _ ~ Linda Chauner Rika Mouw Helen Mdntyre Jce k Gayle Brower Red ISon 4 Pink Eber Simba Run ,~'~q~, w' Y Rita Mueller Barbara Millet Mary Davis } ' d a~ d~ Elizabeth Gil Mae ean Nothsfine Sitzmark Lodge ] Enid Nilsson Dana DelBosco • 'a ~ s ' , Mrtu Cunmez Gnd Nussbaum Slifer, Smith & Frampion i+~w =e g - ~ Y Marie Orlin Suzi Brendon sp, ~a~ MitsyHandler EvaO en Village Center Commercial Linda Isbell h Ann Repet6 Susan Frampton guildin ya J John Rasmussen Nan Rondeau Helen Fritch g ~ ^ ~ Cath ones ry Vorlaufer YJ Ann Repetti Maureen Shapiro Deane Hall s.. ;F ; ; = e^ ~ Tem Lame Adrienne Rivera Ken Slum ane Hari Helen S. Frltch ~rt"l"' Mona Look Cheryl Rondeau Pearl Taylor Marty Jones Beft Ford and Susan Ford Bales visit the Gardens in Ford Park Jeannie McGill Flora Sartatt Joanne Lery President of the Board y Sara Pounder Richard Tall during the summer o f 1993. Y Mona Look Dominique Sire Pearl Taylor Jane Misakian 2 7 continued from page 4 ~~p ~ ~ r ~y'~ - (//~J Corporation) and our valued patrons (listed on page 6) are ~ , ~ t ~ ~ " most important to the success of the event, which earned ~ y ~ ` ~ o o~j ~ ~ M ^ ^ $22,000 for the operation of the Gardens. " ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ U (y l~Y/l1Yl %u~tsJi With the support and sponsorship of Apollo Ski Partners ~ r ' and the Sitzmark Lodge, we introduced a new summer , , f, ~ o benefit this year. "A Midsummer Night"was presented in ~ ~ ~ the Ford Amphitheater before a Bravo! performance. As well ' w ~ r as providing a summer counterpart to Winter Interlude, the ,n 9 . ` J T~ ' event showed the community how well gardens and music ~ ;y~, ~ ~ ; work together in the cultural ambiance of Ford Park. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r, 3. ' ~ ~ ~ r ~ ! r a ~ ~ ~ ~ r ` a a ~ Our Annual Plant Sale, not only well established but ~ , , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ . , . .-d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_Q eagerly anticipated in early June, earned $2000 for the ~ ~ ~ ~ • . Gardens. As well as the usual bedding plants and common ~ ~ y~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ October 1,1992 through September 30,1993 perennials, we featured some unusual plants as "Introductory ~ ~ xi ~ Specials." We plan to use the plant sale to introduce less t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - - common] rown ]ants into local ardens. Anew Labor - ~ ' ag ~ < 4 ~ ~J'~ A Letter from the h®ard Gardens. It attracted an estimated Yg P g ~ ~ .A rli~/ Day planfgiveaway was introduced by the Garden ~ ;~w ~ ~ , , , ~ ' ~ ~ 1993 has been an exciting and 60,000 visitors this summer and has Volunteers to find homes for the many offshoots (also called e ~ jf~~ become a ma or economic asset for "volunteers")that spring up in the garden every season. ~ ' F# ~ ~ productve year as we plan the large 1 t ~ , ~ }l Vail. Man visitors came strai ht off We are grateful for strong community support for the ~ R; U alpine rock garden and earth-sheltered Y g ~ ~ I U visitor center for Betty Ford Alpine the highway, attracted by the Gardens demonstrated by the success of these benefits. They ~ ~ su lement the income from our annual membershi ~ ~ ~ , ~ descri lion in AAA's Travel Guide. pp p ~ Gardens and prepare a campaign that p program in providing needed funds for the care and ~s---~ ~7 will bring our vision into being, There were visiting garden groups, the maintenance of Betty Ford Alpine Gardens and also for a`,~ ~ : `~w , ~ American Rock Garden Socie -<~~.v ~ Ours is a strong, working Board ty support of our other community programs. ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ that takes an active role in planning concert-goers headed for the Ford r: . ~ N z? _ ~ . 1, r ~ Am hitheater weddin arties an President and Mrs. Ford with flail Alpine Garden Foundation Board ~ fir; ~ ~ ~y~a 3 and carrying out program activities p ~ g p President Helen Fritch at a summer gathering to generate support for the ~~~9- ~ a s ,i r I o enin ni ht Gala for the Bolshoi throughout the year. I am very p g g new Visitor Center and Rock Alpine Garden. f - ~ zy~a ~ Ballet and a icnie for the Jerry Ford grateful for their dedication and ~ P Invitational Golf Tournament. We commitment to our mission and for \ ~ the continuing support and appreciate the role that Mrs. Ford has 'F taken in introducin the arden to k; . , . ~ ' . ~ participation of President and Mrs. g g ~~'r"°`' Vail Non-Profit s ecial rou s. Y Ford. p g p ~ Al 'ne U.S. Postage ~ PAID ~ ~ , ~ We are proud of the growing Last summer's "media blitz" in Garden Foundation Permit No. 31 reputation of Betty Ford Alpine Snow Country, Flower ~ Garden, vail, eolorado ~ Garden Design, and Brides magazine 183 Gore Creek Drive ~ s Vail, Colorado 81657 % f •a~ , . ~ • was followed by a second year of 3~ national magazine coverage, An ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ extensive article appeared in American RECE!V~~ ~ ~ X993 ~ Horticulturalist, and Betty Ford Alpine 3 k Gardens was featured in AAA Home f ~ ° ~ z ~ M ~ ~ ~ Away, the AAA Travel Guide, and ~ ' `A ~ . Denver TV's Colorado Getaway. Local TOWN OF VAIL TCIWN NANpp,E[~ ~ ~ OFFICE ~ k ~ ` ~ a,> ~ g ' publicity on Vail's TV8 and KQMT 75 g, FRONTAGE RD. ~ - r , " captured the attention of Vail visitors, VAIL CO Fii657 e ~ A., . ter'" ~ :j ~ who also were encouraged to "Visit ~ a i ~ ~ ~ ~ Our Bloomin' Gardens" by posters r~ ? ~ drawn by local elementary students ~ ~ ~ and placed in Vail and Beaver Creek rr 1~~~f ~ buses. ~1^ ~ , gr : ~r Significant to future educational ~ ~ ~ . and research programs is a 1993 A l i n e G a rd en An n u a l R e ®rt President Ford and Marty Jones look at the model o f the new Alpine RockGarden with theearth-sheltered Visitor Center. COOperatlve agreement Wlth Denver fail Alpine Garden Foundation, 183 Gore Creek Drive, Uail, Colorado 81657 (303) 476-0103 all contain no phosphorous. The same goes for "C111~S AND COt]N I~1~S PROJECT" are contacting individuals who have water quality scrub pads such as SOS and Scotch Brite. It was UNDERVdAY interests to determine the most appropriate format noticed. that the powdered form of Spic and Span for establishment of such a group.. Currently work comes in two forms, one less than 0.5% phospho- The National Renewable Ener Laborato Bud a Bin am assed awa on Au st 23 has begun in the Blue, Fraser, Eagle, and Roaring rous and the other at 12,1%, so check the box!! (NREL) in Golden, Colorado is de~loping a se- 1993. The following tribute to him from the Sky- Fork Basins. All in all, it's pretty easy to find cleaning prod- ries of fact sheets for local government officials line Six Area Agency on Aging was read at his The immediate tasks .for each of the basin ucts which have low phosphorous concentrations and staff. The purpose of the 4-6 page fact sheets memorial) groups are to: review the current Water Quality (you're probably using them aUeady)! By reading is to rovide information that encoura es local Management Plan's standards and regulations (last the product labels, you can ensure that the prod- p g Budge has been the heart and soul of the revised in 1989 • develo and noritize a Gst of is- governments to integrate renewable energy and Skyline Six Area Agency on Aging Regional Advi- p p ucts you are using'are environmentally friendly. energy-efJ7cient technologies into their operations. sory Council since its inception in the late 70's. He sues specific to the basin; define data and resource The fact sheets will describe successful stories in a needs; and begin listing alternative solutions to ad- served as Chairman of the Council for most of his ~®®TSTRAPP~IG case-study format that quantifies dollar and energy long tenure of service. His leadership skills, won- dressing the issues identified. j{~~~~~ S'~'~,E savings. derfui sense of humor, and willingness to volunteer The Regional Water Quality Management Plan NREL will be producing about 30 fact sheets and assist with every project have always been assesses water quality throughout the region, pro- for the series. Also underwa is a resource ide greatly appreciated by his fellow council members Poses stream standards, identifies water quality In late 1991, Kremmling lost its largest em- Y ~ problem areas, waste water treatment plant capac- ployer when the Louisiana Pacific Waferboard for local governments wishing to acquire more de- and everyone associated with the Area Agency on plant closed. The ranching community of 1100 tailed information. Aging. ity long term needs, and point source permit viola- people40 miles north of Silverthorne and 50 miles For more information or to order fact sheets or Budge always set the example for caring and tions. We hope to make the revised Plan a south of Steamboat Springs wasted no time in re- the resource guide, please contact NWCCOG En- doing as much as he could for senior citizens in document which can be used on a daily basis for er Man ement Director Steve Getz at this region. He covered the entire gamut of in- water quality issues, with reference materials (such positioning its future. ~ ~ as data tables With the hiring of Bill Koehn as Town.Man- 303-468-0295. volvement from representing thousands of western )summarized for easy review, easily alter, Kremmling springboarded into a post re- slope seniors at high-level Colorado Commission updatable to include current statutes and regula- source extraction comeback. .Leaving Louisiana APPLICANTS ItEQUESTE~ on Aging meetings to helping a local senior citizen tions, and serving as a guide for allocation of Pacific behind, Kremmling is in the process ofcon- WATER QiJALI'I'~ ~®NTR®L fill out her tax 'return. Nothing was too big or too resources. small for Budge to care about. . NWCCOG plans to have the document final- . structing a new assisted living center, has applied ~®j~INIISSI®~ for a new Job Corps Center and has received the Budge will be remembered with -great love and ized by year end of 1994. National Forest Service Award for Community The Water Quality Control Commission is re- appreciation by this group for many years to come.. . Action. Construction of the $43 million Wolford We will remember with fondness all the wise and ` "'"""`"`'"~~`~""`~'`"``'~`~'"'""~w'''" questing your assistance in hel in the Governor's ~ ' _ ~ " ~ , ~ ~ ~ Mountain Reservoir romises to boost t ri m in p g~~` ~ ' ~ p ou s og whimsical comments he would offer and the man ~~.~`'"ti\~`.~t~~~`~~%~~,.~~~~~ ce find individuals who would be interested in Y years to come, appointment to the Colorado Water Quality Con- wonderful experiences we shared with him. He set Says Mayor Peg Toft, a four year veteran of trol Commission. One vacancy cureently exists on the example that we will all try to follow. He was National Unfunded Mandates the post, "The Youth Job Corps Program will add the 9-member board and there will be an addi- a true hero for the older population in this area .Call the Colorado Municipal League at over sixty jobs to the community, We anticipate tional vacancy in February,1994, due to a resigna- and his presence will be greatly missed by all'ofus. 831-6411" or the Northwest Colorado Council of the need to build new houses if that ro'ect oes Governments at 468-0295 for a packet explaining P J g tion. This term will be up for reappointment in what your jurisdiction can do about unfunded through." February, 1995. WATER Qi1E~L~TY .mandates. Aided by the Forest Service, the town Master If you or other members of your organization ~ . A~E~E~T PI,A~ Plan resulted in a vision and success that have left are interested in serving on this commission, ~ Imoact Assistance Grant Cvcles most Kremmling residents feeling that though it's please contact Marla Biberstine at 303-692-3525. The Water Quality Program is gearing up to October 15,1993 - Grant Applications been a rough transition, they're better off deter- The Northwest Colorado Council of Govern- minin their awn destin . revise the Northwest Colorado Council of Gov- February 9-10,1994 - Hearings in Trinidad g Y merits has a long history of successful advocacy on' ernment's Regional Water Quality Management April 1, 1994 - Next Grant Application Deadline There are many who deserve credit for ,behalf of the quality of the Region's water. We Kremmling's youthful recovery, thou ultimatel Plan, with lots of input from each of the local river July 14-15,1994 - Hearings in Steamboat Springs ~ Y need dedicated applicants to the WQCC and basins in Region XII. We plan to use existing wa- itwas the community that came together in a spirit would be happy to review and consider endorse- of coo eration. NWCCOG con atulates ter quality committees in basins where'they exist Zeriscaoe and Water Conservation Ordinances p gr merit of a well balanced water quality advocate to (the Fraser and the Blue), with participation by ad- A Beginner's Primer -Available at cost of pho- Kremmling on its success and looks forward with this commission. Please forward copies of appli- you to a bright future. ~ ditional stakeholders to allow a wide range of in- tocopying from NWCCOG. Call Norma Sundin at cations to NWCCOG for review and terests to be represented. In those basins where 468-0295. . consideration. ~ existing water quality committees do not exist, we NWCCOG STAr~r• Sandy Blaha Co-Executive Director ~ • Linda Venturoni Co-Executive Director - , & SSAAA Director - • Steve Getz Energy Management Director To help us save on Volume 5 Issue 3 November, 1993 Ed Del Duca Community Development copies and postage, • • Director LARRY KALLENBERGER . blooms (eutrophication), Dillon Reservoir in . Robert Ray Water Quality Director please circulate Summit County has a phosphorous concentration ` Karen Thorson Northwest Loan Fund AND DENNIS FISHER, _ • this newsletter. _ _ _ , - - limit_(7.4 ug/l) to_prevent eutrophication of the_ . _ - _ .Director - - - - - - - - - • - _ - - ~ rEATURED SPEAKERS AT e• Billy Hulse Elevator Inspector ~ Research has. shown that about 60% of the 303-468-0295 DEC 9TH BOARD MEETING phosphorous in domestic waste water comes from • IN GRANBY - detergents. A potentially inexpensive approach to Kevin Lindahl Quality/Quantity Director reducing phosphorous concentrations from domes- , • The December board meeting has a full tic water waste is to ban high phosphorous con- . 303-328-7050 agenda featuring approval of the 1994 budget; se- tag soap products. A survey of local sources ' lection of community projects. for the Community of soap products in the Dillon Reservoir area re- Development Department 1994 work program and vealed some interesting results. ~ discussions with Lary Kallenberger, Executive Di- All liquid laundry detergents contain no phos- 1 ~ 1~ 1' C C O V 1 ~1 ~ .1' 1' S rector, Department of Local Affairs- and Dennis phorous. Most of the powdered laundry deter- Fisher, Routt County Commissioner.' gents available contain less than 0.5% .,~=.u~._.•,. „3~,,._,.._.~~,,,.~.~~.:.-.,~~.~,,~.,..~. ~e,~~_,_..d..,.-,,,._,_ Dennis Fisher v~~ll be addressing phosphorous (good)> but " the work of his implementation sub- NWCCOG Board Meeting there are several products . committee for the Health and Human, available which do contain Services Restructuring Steering Com- December 9, 1993 high levels of phosphorous mittee. Lany Kallenberger has been (7-12%): How to tell the NORTHWEST COLORADO asked to speak about his work on the 1;00 PM - 4;00 PM difference? read the label, COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bulk Rate . National Performance Review and its ~ it will tell you. P.O. BOX 2308 US Postage Paid ~ implications for local government. • Granby Community Cenler All hand dishwashing SILVERTHORNE, CO 80498 Permit No. 12 The program maybe of interest to liquids have no phospho- Frisco, CO 80443 Public Health Nurses and Social Service Directors rous, but only one auto- • as well as COG board members. All are welcome. matic dishwashing soap contained no phosphorous Please RSVP if you plan to attend lunch prior to (Greenmark, distributed by Topco Associates). - ~ • the meeting. ~ The powdered automatic dishwashing detergents _ were generally 50% higher in phosphorous than • the gel,type detergents (6-9% versus 4-5%). A GETTING ><ti~ "P" OUT Proctor and Gamble customer service representa- ' tive said that they have not found a • no- . ' The Water Quality Program recently_ cam-, Phosphorous formula for automatic dishwashers ' ~ ~ ' • pleted a research project related to .soaps and de- that does not leave water spots on glasses and flat- ` ~ tergents in preparation for a Summit County ware in high hardness water - but• they re working Pam Brandmeyer , Vail Town Commissioner's hearing on a phosphorous mitiga- on it. ~ ' Clerk What about other general household cleaners. 75 5 . Frontage Rd . W . tion plan. Phosphorous (P) is a chemical which va i l , CO 81657 , . acts as a plant fertilizer. In. the aquatic environ- With respect to phosphorous, you're safe. Cleans- e ment phosphorous can cause algal or aquatic plant ers (Aj'ax, Comet, Bon Ami), and liquid cleaners (Pine Sol, Mr. Clean; 409, Fantastic, Top Job, etc) I~Teecl C®nlxnunity Devel®pnlent Assistance? bequests for assistance from C®Ca 's Community I3evelopment I3epartment should be sent in by 26 hdovember 1993. - ach December the iVWCCOG ~ We have already received Board reviews requests from member applications for several projects for next jurisdictions for technical assistance in year. If you' have a project ~ appropriate 'for community devel.,Yu~ent and related azeas. .the COG Community Development Typically, four or more projects are selected Department; please contact Ed Del DUCA, each year. Requests for assistance for ~ Community Development Director, to smaller projects may be submitted any time discuss it and obtain an application, ` and are worked on as staff time is available. communities and Counties with , Projects or more than 4 hours require COG planning staffs are encouraged to think boar authorization. regional or sub-regional. Smaller The criteria used by the Board in communities with little or no staff are selecting the larger projects includes items encouraged to think of their most critical such' as: needs or of needs that may be common to other small communities in the region. o The number of communities to benefit Inter jurisdictional issues may also be from the project; appropriate for COG projects. o Applicability of the project to other Ed has over twenty years of diverse member communities; ~ experience, in planning and community o Degree of threat to health or safety; ~ development, 'a master's degree in planning o Cost/Benefits of project to the community and design and a bachelor's degree in civil and/or region; engineering. He can offer a broad range of o Timeliness (Window of Opportunity); assistance. Examples include, but are not o Inability of existing town staff to complete limited to: the project; o Lack of financial resources~to fund the Strategic Planning ®Community Visioning o Meeting Facilitation ¦ Educational project; ~ 'Workshops on: Planning and Community o Level of community involvement; Development, Sustainable Development, o Ability of the community to implement Proposal Review and related topics. ¦ Policy project results; research and development ¦ Project proforma o Status of ongoing assistance to ~ analysis ®Long Range Planning ®Downtown community; ~ Development ¦ Corridor Studies ¦ Analysis and o Historic Community return on COG dues; mitigation of development or annexation impacts o Local Match ~ Land Use Analysis ®Policy Reseazch and Development ¦ Conceptual Design and Site - Selected projects require some local match ~ Planning ©Pazking Analysis w/ computer such as staff or volunteer time, cost of modeling ®Funding Source Search and Grant publication, copies, just, about anything that Writing Assistance ®Growth Management reduces COG's cost to complete the project. Strategies ® Development Project Review Reseazch on Legislative Proposals m ADA compliance ®Space Needs Analysis. ' i .RURAL DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Northwest Colorado Council ANNOUNCES COMMUI~IITY FACII,ITIES of Governments staff recently LOAN PROGRAM ~ - attended a workshop describing ~ ~ ' the FmHA Rural Development . ,Administration Community Facilities Loan Program. ,The staff feels the program may have great applicability to our member communities and ~is further investigating the opportunities. Look for future agenda items on this topic at upcoming board meetings. { , The Community Facilities Loan Program In Brief Puroose: To develop community facilities for public use in rural areas and towns.. Funds may be , used to construct, enlarge or improve community facilities for health care, public safety and - public services. ; • ~ ~ ~ . . Eligible Area: Rural areas and towns of not more than 20,000 in population. _ Who Mav Receive Assistance: Public entities such as municipalities, counties; special purpose ' ~ .districts, Indian tribes and non-profit corporations. • Eligible Loan Purooses: Essential community facilities such as: - ~ . 1. Hospitals, nursing homes, dental or medical clinics, assisted living facilities, day care centers - and rehabilitation centers. - 2: Public safety facilities such as fire stations and buildings to house equipment. 3. Purchase of fire trucks, ambulances and emergency communications equipment. ' 4. To buy and build fire and rescue multi-service centers, police stations and jails. - 5. Public service facilities including community buildings, courthouses, public maintenance ' buildings, libraries, fairgrounds, day care-adult and /or children, utilities and other ~ . • improvements. Loan. Guidelines: , ~ Loans are made through local banks in cooperation with the Rural Development Administration's loan guarantee progam. Interest rates are market rates unless Community . ..Reinvestment Act cooperation is obtained from your lender. ,Maximum term of the loan is 40 , ~ , years.. Banks are guaranteed up to 80% of the loan value. ~ There is a one time l% fee assessed at closing. ~ , The Northwest Colorado Council of Governments will provide ~a regional workshop on , the Community Facilities Loan Program if there is interest from the membership. Non-profits, ' human service and health care professionals and special districts may also benefit from this workshop. If you or someone in your community is interested in a workshop on this program, call Linda Boucher or Sandy Blaha at 468-0295. We need a minimum of l5 confirmed 'participants to prepare the workshop. Cost of the one day workshop is estimated at $40,•and will most likely be held in Frisco in January. s' ~ttrs ' x e ~u,~,>~: ` ~ ~ ~ I - sogr~:• ~1.®~ Page s ~ .planning commission and the coup- sion who,' with many others (and for ciL , : ; ~e.~@~ehp~len~ - - ~-.And we-got additional employee . ; absolutely .no pay). spent' hundreds housing from each pr~Ject ;y r ` ~ ~ ~e~~'~(I®6'lls _ of-hours to help create a budding ~e Athletic.Club onlyaook 3 or j To the'Editor which :would be, an excellent :focus ~ ~ 4 hearing$ because the;owner,~was ` s Last Tuesday; the Town of Vail at; the end of Bridge Street T, End j r~r very attuned ,to;the:concerns of.the was p'etihoned 6 a s ~ the latent action of this s ecial i+ Y pedal interest - r ~ + p ~ commission and'couneil~and did 4; group to hold a referendum on town ~ m`terest group disgusting; and- self- y; I serving 3 ~ everything he was.asked. ; - council approva;=of the',redevelop- ~ ~ ' So, 1VIr Lamont and your special ment ofthe Golden Peak ,House and ~ ~ Now ``let s talk about; the Vail 'the Vail Athletic C1ub:..In accor= Athlehc'Club:' No question .it, fills interest group .Stop .impeding well dance with statutory law, the grow the site. But that is not the issue. considered improvements to the ; .must now get about three hundred , The building has been an economic Towrr of Vail. The .SDD section of ' - - the zonin ordinance is .am excellent signatures on petitions , by disaster because it was poorly con- g 'December first'to require the refer- ceived at the begmmng': So if we venue to provide guidelines for the look at th ~ dev n f difficult b endum, ~ ~ e ob ectives of_ the Towri re elopme t`o uildings ~ I for one am truly tired, of special of Vail, which .include providing in Vail. To suggest that every SDD . ,%n.teresG---.groups;'=especially those adequate services to guests and resi- should require a referendum is ho - .with wash and necessitates the ex ~ S . participants #hat don't hve~tier dents,`"the 'addition 'of dormers to peridi= full trine, attemptmg_ to run the allow the Athletic Club to use avast- tore of money which can be used Town of Vail Its-spokesperson, Jim ed inner space for additional hotel more efficiently elsewhere -such ~ I ~L'amont.(,a k a'Dg~Bruce`Lamont) rooms was a wise decision_ by the Please see Letters, Page 30' doesn't ev„„en hve in Vaal: -i3e simply ~ - 4 collects ~a:payclieck~from+his-special interest group and "theq,`goes home to Redcliff. I therefore strongly hope that the petition drive=of'this'obstruetonist special interest`group fails `notably. . Pei-hags a tittle ~nstglt vii ''the rede"velopment qf~ bothproperties - t r - ~ tivould be .of use Rededelopment~of ~ ~ ' tl~e Go-lden Peak House:-was ~ ~,~~rS approved after incredible scrutiny by the Planntng;,and Environmental ~9'®6~. ~~9~ ~ ~ j Commission the~:Design Review Board.and the'Val~Town Council. is for the bus system and~street~ ~ The ~platuing eominission° held 1~4 maintenance:' .hearings orr theGolden Peak°House Sincerely,; redevelopment, which resulted in a Jeff Bo"wen ~ t+' recommenclatlon tQ the council,that, the Special.Development-District .(SDD) planYbe~approved_':for rede- velopment,of `the.:ughest-buldmg.:;in ~ Vail - offeniig-improved.views,. landscaping, streetscaping`ancl a greatly improved design..As. a member of 'the planning commis- Please see Letters, Page 7 November 26, 1993 r ® By ,Yohn Calhoanra Creek Reservations, a board review and Times Midweek Editor restatement of clearly defined mission and goals, and finally a way to track the : On the heels of Avon's decision to results of the valley-wide marketing end its $90,000 contribution to valley- effort. wide summer marketing, Beaver Creek The resort company also, wants to Resort Company board members say .change the representative seating on they might want to contribute after all. the marketing board. The marketing - But the amount mentioned to Vail board will discuss this proposal next Valley Marketing Board officials last week. week is far less than the marketing First and most important, Beaver board had asked. The marketing board Creek is not offering $180,000, which - operates on a $785,000 annual budget was determined to be its fair share. contributed by the towns of Vail and That alone could kill the deal, according "p~;; ~ ~ • - Avon, Vail Associates, Beaver Creek and to members of the board. other resort entities. Marketing Board President Tom The Beaver Creek board, which is Britz said it is still a possibility the made up of Vail Associates officials, current board will disband and Beaver Creek merchants and reorganize as the Vail Marketing Board homeowners, told the marketing board or the Vail/Beaver Creek Marketing ~ several weeks ago that it would likely Board, if Beaver Creek participates and ~ not contribute the $180,000 that Avon chooses not to. marketing board members had Avon council members, who voted determined was Beaver Creek's fair 5-2 to last week to end their $90,000 share for summer marketing. Initially, contribution to the marketing board, Beaver Creek officials balked at the may take another look at the matter if request, saying it was already paying the Beaver Creek offer is accepted. At half of Vail Associates' $50,000 business least two council members, who voted license tab for the Town of Uail. to kill the association, indicated they However, according to Beaver Creek did so because of Beaver Creek's - Resort Company officials, they may be decision not to support the effort. willing to contribute up to $100,000 if If ~ the marketing moard and the the Vail Valley Marketing Board is Town of Vail accept the Beaver Creek willing to institute some changes of its Resort Company offer and assuming own. Avon contributes $90,000, the Specifically, the resort company marketing board would have $785,000 wants a recomposition of the marketing rather than $685,000. board to create a "more representative One stumbling block is the cost of board," equal representation of both of tracking results. It would eat into the - . . ~ the recognized reservations and funds available for the board's primary - - - booking agencies-Vail Tourist and goal-advertising this area to potential Convention Bureau and Vail/Beaver. summer visitors. e4 T®i~l ~F VAIL _ _ _ - 75 South Frontage Road bail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR 6NInAE®@A°TE RL~~EASE November 24, 1993 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn 479-2115 ®STERF®SSa I?sAP9N RETAIN SEA®ERSHIP SEATS ®N T®YVN C®UNCIL. (!/ail)--Peggy Osterfoss gill continue a second term as Vail's mayor, and Merl lapin will retain his position as mayor pro-tem for the next two years. The two were chosen by a majority vote of the council during a work session yesterday (11-23). Osterfoss was first elected to the council in 1989, and was named mayor in 1991. Her current term on the council will end in 1997. Lapin was first elected in 1987 and was re-elected in 1991. His current term ends in 1995. Following aswearing-in ceremony yesterday for the council's four new members-- Paul Johnston, Peggy Osterfoss, Sybill Navas and Jan Strauch--appointments were made to the following boards and committees: --N®rt6~wes~ ~®a,a~c60 ®f ~®veravr~e~ts Representative: Tom Steinberg Alternate: Deferred --~a10 @!a9@ey '~®~arisa~ ~ ~®r~venta®~ S~rea~ Representative: Jan Strauch Alternate: Jim Shearer --~a~B Tra~sp®rltati®~ and Park~ri~ °Task F®r~e Representatives: Sybill Navas, Peggy Osterfoss (more) Council Appointments/Add 1 --Colorado Assn. of Ski Towns Representative: Jim Shearer Alternate: Merv Lapin --Vail Recreation District/'Town Council Committee Members Representatives: Merv Lapin, Paul Johnston --Art in Public Places Representative: Tom Steinberg Alternate: Jan Strauch --Special Events Committee Representative: Sybill .Navas --Bravo!. Colorado Board Representatives: Merv Lapin, Sybill Navas --Appointment Committee to duality/Quantity Committee/NWCCOG Member Representative: Tom Steinberg Alternate: Sybill Navas --Avon-Beaver Creek-Vail Regional Transportation Committee Representatives: Peggy Osterfoss, Tom Steinberg -=Eagle County Recreation Authority Representative: Merv Lapin Alternate: Paul Johnston --Town of Vail Housing Authority Representative: Peggy Osterfoss Alternate: Jim Shearer --Channel 5 Vail Valley Community Television Representative:.. Jeff Atencio, Vail Fire Inspector -Vail Improvement Process (VIP) Quality Control Representative: Peggy Osterfoss --Vail Improvement Process (VIP) Steering Committee Representatives: Merv Lapin, Paul Johnston --Cemetery Committee Deferred --Open Lands Corrrmittee Representatives: Tom Steinberg, Peggy Osterfoss --Council Personnel Sub-Committee Deferred --Vail Valley Arts Council Representative: Jim Shearer --Ski Museum Board Deferred --Vail Alpine Garden Advisory Board Deferred (more) Council Appointments/Add 2 --Vaew ~®rr6d®rr Task F®rce Deferred Also, --Appointment of Euck Allen as fiflunicipal Judge --Appointment of Karen fi~orter and Kay Cheney to Election Commission The Vail Town Council meets regularly at 7:30 p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month. Afternoon work sessions are held the second and fourth Tuesday at 2 p.m. For more information, contact the Community Relations Office at 479-2115. # e4 T®i~l ~F VAIL ~ _ 75 South Frontage Road fail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 NAE~ABEF$S ,Margaret (Peggy) A. Oster~oss, Mayor 3950 N. Frontage Rd. ~4 Vail, CO 81657 476-0503 Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem 232 Nest Meadow Dr. Vaii, CO 81657 476-5483 Paul R. Johnston 356 E. Hanson Ranch Rd. Vail, CO 81657 .476-5641 /476-5229 (h) Sybill Navas 1.83 Gore Creek Dr. Vail, CO 81657 476-4sso/476-4632 (h) Jan Strauch P.O. Box 2389 Vail, CO 81658 949-1600/476-6479 (h) Jim Shearer 5109 Black Gore Drive "B" !/ail, CO 81657 476-3554 Tom Steinberg P.O. Box 13 Vail, CO 81658 476-5427 Bob McLaurin, Town Manager 75 S. Frontage Fid. Vail, CO 81657 479-2 9 05 NOV z4 '98 03~00PM CORUM RERL ESTATE i P.1 , Feat Estate Group, Inc. J~ 1y~kvY~gg • dµ~1y[~~ ~ry1y1i1J~~pi bo4y H97~ °Ii'~o l~yc~>~ P~~gY ~sf~as ~~o P~ti~se Iftrlppa and ~ame•~Ftapatriclc RT~e I~A~r~o 2 {~1n~I~s~n~ ~~v~° ~~a) ~o Foy year nnf~,~,t.atim~t. - ; Qsa~~ ~~~-~o~~ Clne P3YC, 9251 DZ'C Parkway, Suite #850, Englewood, Cblbr~tdo 80111, 309-796.2000 NOV z4 '9S 03~00PM CORUM REAL ESTATE P.Z ~P ~ Rea! FstaGe Grain, lrtc. l~l'ovemb~ ~4, 1993 VILA llF"At~~ ~~ya~ leggy ~attass 'Y'mwn of Vail '7S South T~rant~ge Road Vaal, $1657 , ~eg$Y~ ~h/e would lid to ~,t,aGss mur ingest in the potential development ~,x~,.,xtunities for the scv~ 1~res of land owned by the 'Town located on the north fratatage goad ita west ~lafl between the »randess building and the Safeway eentee if it is still available. iNe understand that a mixed uge pgaject incorporating same r~ployee hauling might be a feasible concept and ctinly m>ne we wa~ld have an ae~terest an discussing fugtheP with you. ~•Ie will be in Vail nett week an T'hlar~ay and ~+riday, December ~ and 3, far our wkly ~nsbrucdan and management meetang for our lake tvreek Village project in Edwards and were hopeful that y®u might have some time available then to meet watt ~s. Vve will glue you a call mn Monday, RTavembt:r Z~, to what would be Tnor~t canverrdeat far you. Sincea~ely, r J ~7. l~ichacl I~amppa awes 1gi atrick l~~sident ~ecutave F1i~ presidcnt /ls 2 One DTC, b257~ DTC Parkway, Suite #$$0,,6nglewoocl, Colorado 8(1117., 3(13°796=2000 a,.. . ~j d., i STAB ~ OF COLOR~O OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR oe-co F~~~ One Sherman Place, Suite 100 H p 140 East 19th Avenue tr e Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 894-2750 ° r876 ° FAX (303) 894-2759 Roy Romer Governor - November 17, 1993 Dear IVlayor: - , I am certain, as a community leader, you are aware of the existing problems with youth and random violence in -Colorado. Finding answers to these problems will require multiple approaches.. I know that there are many prevention and intervention programs in Colorado working on the violence issue. However, we do not have a comprehensive inventory of all existing programs or a way to evaluate them all. The first step is to create an inventory of what exists. I am -asking for your help in creating this inventory.. Please complete the enclosed survey and return it to my Community Partnership Office by November 30, 1993. I am looking for information on all prevention and intervention programs within your local government. There is growing evidence that some of the same, . strategies. that can prevent drug and alcohol abuse or other negative behavior may also prevent violent behavior. As you list your programs, think very broadly - about prevention and intervention. For example, programs such as adult literacy, teen pregnancy, early childhood, injury, and crime prevention would be included. There are many ways to approach this problem and we want to be complete. Thank you for your assistance. I believe this information will be valuable to - all of us. ' Sincerely, Roy r - Governor '.~`~tr~ , ~ '.t~.n `r •0'x-1 _ ~ ~~/J~ - - l/lr,1~1 V _ - - ~~J~~ i lmployee ]Education Seminars: Target Group: employee base within the Vail Valley Services Provided: 2 hour educational seminars on a variety of loss prevention, safety and. violence prevention topics, including: 1) Robbery Prevention and Survival 2) Personal Security and Survival 3) Shoplifting Detection and Prevention 4) Credit Card and Check Fraud Prevention 5) Fraud and Con Games Detection and Prevention 6) Money Handlers Seminar 7) Alcohol Servers Liability and Service Issues (Separate from the TIPS class) School Liaison Program: Target Group: Elementary age children as well as teachers and other school staff Services Provided: A variety of presentations and topics are offered throughout the year. Topics include: 1) Crime Prevention and You 2) School Bus Safety 3) Stranger Awareness and Safety 4) Bike Safety 5). Home Alone Safety 6) Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention ' 7) Child Abuse Issues (For older children, parents and staff 8) Personal Safety (For school staff Community Speaker,lProgram: Target Group: Vail Valley Community in General Services Provided: Speaker for a variety of functions. Topics presented include: 1) Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace: Recognition and Intervention 2) Hotel Security 3) Hiring the Right Person: Backgrounds and Crime Prevention 4) CPTED: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design 5) Child Abuse Recognition, Prevention and Intervention 6) Police Role Within the Community 7) Domestic Violence: Detection, Recognition and Intervention 8) Personal Security and Safety at Home and the Workplace Public Access Television Station ]Program: Target Group: Television Audience Services Provided: A joint Fire Department and Police Department Issues and Affairs show. Airs on a monthly basis. ll ~S Alcohol Service )<ntervention Gflasses: Target Group: Restaurant /Bar servers, managers, wait staff Services: Recognition and Intervention procedures training relating to alcohol abuse prevention. central Rockies Prevention Project: Target Group: Varied -From local businesses to alcohol service establishments to parents Services: CRPP provides several ongoing services. The Vail Police are involved in several "small group projects" including 1) Establishing an ongoing TIPS training program 2) Coordinating TIPS Train the Trainer programs 3) interagency Advisory Group for the Program 4) Gang Graffiti Removal Resource Project 5) Business "Crime Free Environment" Program implementation Safety Magic ]Program: Target Group: Elementary and younger children Services: Safety and Crime Prevention Presentation using magic and illusions to emphasize the material. Citizenship, home alone safety, drug abuse prevention safety are included topics. i~w (Rotefl ><ntervention ]Program): Target Group: Hotel employees and management Services Provided: For management -background criminal records checks for applicants. For ..hired staff -Identification service acknowledging participation in the program. ~ Security and Safety surveys of participating businesses. ! ~gnternafl 'T'heft >Eml~ezzflement Saarvey: Target Group: Business owners, upper management Services Provided: "Custom" internal theft and embezzlement prevention survey. This service is offered to help detect and deter thefts by employees, bookkeepers and management staff. Retail' ]Loss Prevention ~onl'erence: Target Group: Business owners, managers and front-line supervisors Services Provided: Annual conference bringing in speakers on a variety of loss prevention topics related to employees, drug and alcohol abuse prevention (workplace emphasis) and other . business-related loss prevention /law enforcement cooperative concerns. S~~V~~ ~RE~~~~@®6~ ~ ~~~ERVE~~?ON ~R®(~RAI~S Please return this survey to the community Partnership Office at 940 E: 19th .4ve., Ssrite 800, Denver, C® 80203 or fan 1t 80 13031 894-2759. Organization Name: L Pout c;i ~~r Address: ~ ~-7 City: ~~h L Zip: GO ~S 1 ~ Phone: ~ ~ Contact Person: ~~f-~"UG~- ~J S~~ About the oraanization: This organization is ' ect service provider A s spring agency t oth (If this is a sponsoring agency with a number of programs, please use the other side of this sheet, copy more forms or include additional information such as brochures or annual reports.) About the orooram: Name of program: ~ . =~~1~ Target group(s): Services: Approx. annual budget: Source(s): Year program started: VCI. r? Q Any plans to expand change, terminate this program or start a new one? f :Person com {etin form: I~~ Title: (_p~t wtU1J1'0./ I~-~ l,~ ~ 4 p 9 PV ~L ~ ~ ~,~C-a c ~ ~ • recr,~-e~-t' . (~~~~I~'~'~ 4~04~ 2 ~ 9993=. 5~~~~. OF CO~.OI~~O COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NEALTF9 oF,_coto Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and ye j \~9$ environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue ~ X876 ~ Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 802 20-3 71 6 (303) 691-4700 Roy Romer Governor MEMORANDUM Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH Executive Director TO: Interested Parties ~~~G?~:C~ FROM: Dick Parachini, Eagle me Project Manager DATE: November 17, 1993 SUBJECT: Eagle Kline Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -October 1993 (EAG 7.1.6.3) The attached letter and table is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program during October 1993. The airborne particulate data collected by the Paramount air monitors shown in the tables are preliminary in nature. This means that the Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) values may be revised after auditing and validation by the air monitoring contractor and the State. The information is useful in assessing emissions during this time period, as well as trends in potential human exposure. The air monitoring stations on top of the Minturn Middle School and at the North Cross Creek station were reactivated by Paramount on June 12 and have continued to operate on a 1-in-3 day schedule. This sampling frequency will be maintained through the 1993 construction season. The concentrations for TSP, Pb (Lead), As (Arsenic), and Cd (Cadmium) were below the air emissions permit levels during the month of October. The notation ug/m 3 stands for micrograms per cubic meter. A microgram equals one millionth (1/1,000,000) of a gram. Site activities in October continue to be associated with collection and transfer of mine seepage and other contaminated water to the lined storage ponds at the Consolidated Tailings Pile. The water treatment plant has continued to treat this water and discharge it to the Eagle River. Sludge generated from the treatment plant continues to be deposited on top of the Consolidated Tailings Pile. The filming of the movie Tall Tale was finished in the Belden area on October 18. Construction activities at the Consolidated Tailings Pile at Cross Creek include reshaping of stockpiled tailings material, excavation and screening of clean soil cap material, placement and compaction of cap materials, installation of the synthetic liner in the dewatered sludge disposal cell, and construction of temporary water impoundments. A surface runoff drainage chute was also excavated off the northwest side of the pile to allow clean rain and snowfall to be released from the new cap area once it has been approved by the State. Construction also continues on the sludge dewatering system next to the water treatment plant building. G ,r ai _ ~ Air Monitoring Results -October 1993 2 For additional information, please contact Dick Parachini (692-3396), Doug Ikenberry (827- 5928), or Marion Galant (692-3304). DP/dp Attachments F d ~ Eagle Engineering Services,lnc. l November 11, 1993 l~Ir. ~°~rW~t~~~rrt~ Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive So. Denver, C® 80222-1530 Dear Dick: Enclosed are three (3) copies of the Gctober 1993 Airborne Particulate Concentrations Report for the Eagle l~i[ine site. We would emphasize the provisional nature of the data and the fact that revisions may be made after auditing and validation. Sincerely, EAGL~ ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. r ~ ~ Lai a R. 1Viatthe Project Engineer LRI~/ccp cc: Howard Roitman, Remedial Programs, CDH Douglas Ikenberry, CDH Robert Neukirchner, EES G. Greg Lord, EES Chris Crouse, D&1VI NOV ~ 5 1993 710 Kipling St. Suite 305 ~ Lakewood, CO 80215 ~ (303) 235-0733 a (3031235-0915 FAX AIRBORNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS EAGLE MINE SITE OCTOBER 1993 (uglln'1 SCHOOL SITE NORTH SITE Date Same TSP• Pb" AS r a r Cd a w • LlSLto r ~4 • r • G+d r D P ,~to 10/01/93 20.4 0.0135 0.0028 < 0.0039 13.9 27,2 0.0094 < 0.0019 < 0.0038 20.4 10/OA/93 27.7 0.0361 0.0064 < 0.0038 14.B 27,5 0.0119 < 0.0021 < 0.0037 15,0 10/07!93 9.7 0.0072 < 0,0020 < 0.0035 4,8 8.9 < O.Ofl31 < 0.0013 < 0.0038 5.4 10/10!93 5.1 < 0.0041 < 0.0020 < 0.0035 2.8 7.5 < 0.0031 < 0.0019 < 0.0036 4.0 10/13!93 8.5 < 0.0041 < 0.0020 < 0.0034 5.6 9.7 < 0.0030 0.0022 < 0.0035 7.2 10/16/93 6.1 ~ < 0.0041 < 0.0020 < 0.0035 3.9 7.9 0.0046 < 0.0018 < 0,0036 ID 10/19/93 5.4 < 0.0037 < 0.0018 < 0.0035 3.3 9,4 < 0.0034 < 0,0020 < 0.0435 4.8 10/22/93 16.7 < 0.0041 < 0.0020 < 0.0035 6.1 t 7.0 < 0.0031 0.0028 < 0.0035 10.2 10/25!93 21.5 < 0.0033 0.0040 < O.Ofl3a 9.4 19.8 < 0.0030 < 4.0018 < 0.0034 9.6 10/28/93 15.7 < 4,0032 0.0019 < 0.0037 6.0 17.6 < 0.0030 < 0.0018 0,0062 9.6 10/31!93 3.4 0.0040 < 0,0019 < 0.0037 2,0 7.3 < 0,0030 < 0.0018 < 0.003a 4.3 ID ~ Invalid data Permit limitetfon is 160l~G/m~ Permit IimitetEon is 1.6 /rAhn' ' Permit trigger level ie OA70 /rghn' THESE DATA AAE PROVISIONAL AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER VAlIOATtON - G~~~~IV~~:~ - - ~ ° 2 1l STATE. OF CO~OR~ADO COLORADO DEPARTMEf\IT OF HEALTH one c°~o~ Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and ~e ~~~~9 environment of the people of Colorado ~ ~ d ~ tr 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue ~ X876 ~ Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80 2 2 0-3 71 6 (303) 691-4700 Roy Romer Governor MEMORANDUM Patricia A. Nolan, MD, MPH Executive Director TO: Interested Parties t ~~~~~u,,,~~, FROM: Dick Parachini, Eagle Mine Project Manager DATE: November 24, 1993 SUBJECT: State Air Monitoring Results - September/October 1993 Enclosed is a summary of the air monitoring data collected in front of the Minturn Middle School by the State of Colorado during the Eagle Mine remedial activities. These units were reactivated prior to the beginning of the school session at the Minturn Middle School. This data is used in the ongoing health assessments conducted for the site. This monitoring station will be operated through the 1993 construction season at the site. The data from the 1993 construction season will be evaluated to determine the need for continued monitoring during the winter shutdown season. If you have questions about the air monitoring results, please call me at 692-3396. Date TSP Pb Cd As ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 09-01-93 11 <0.02 <0.001 0.0022 09-02-93 15 <0.02 <0.001 0.0010 09-03-93 15 <0.02 <0.001 0.0016 09-04-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0011 09-05-93 7 <0.02 <0.001 0.0007 09-06-93 8 <0.02 <0.001 0.0018 09-07-93 9 <0.02 <0.001 0.0013 09-08-93 8 <0.02 <0.001 0.0012 09-10-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0019 fI 09-10-93 21 <0.02 <0.001 0.0022 09-11-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0021 09-12-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0010 ~ttld~~~~j~G~ 09-13-93 6 <0.02 <0.001 0.0014 09-14-93 12 <0.02 <0.001 0.0016 _ 09-15-93 Invalid Data 09-16-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0053 09-17-93 13 <0.02 <0.001 0.0026 09-18-93 16 <0.02 <0.001 0.0021 09-19-93 9 <0.02 <0.001 0.0028 09-20-93 19 <0.02~ <0.001 0.0034 09-21-93 17 <0.02 <0.001 0.0041 09-22-93 19 <0.02 <0.001 0.0032 Sept/Oct Air Monitoring Data November 24, 1993 2 Date TSP Pb Cd As ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 09-23-93 19 <0.02 <0.001 0.0023 09-24-93 29 <0.02 <0.001 0.0041 09-25-93 19 <0.02 <0.001 0.0014 09-26-93 14 <0.02 <0.001 0.0034 09-27-93 26 0.04 <0.001 0.0048 09-28-93 30 0.04 <0.001 0.0042 09-29-93 11 <0.02 <0.001 0.0023 09-30-93 50 0.10 <0.001 0.0156 10-O1-93 31 0.04 <0.001 0.0046 10-02-93 27 0.02 <0.001 0.0030 10-03-93 15 <0.02 <0.001 0.0011 10-04-93 35 0.07 <0.001 0.0083 10-05-93 29 0.03 <0.001 0.0035 10-06-93 34 0.03 <0.001 0.0044 DP/dp x e : EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 50~ JOHN LANGE -SUPERINTENDENT P.O. BOX 740 ~ EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 ~ (303) 328-6321 ~ FAX {303) 328-1024 November 29, 1993 Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Town of Vail Vail, CO 81657 Reo Eagle County School District Re50J School Impact Regulations Dear Mayor Osterfoss, Recently the Eagle County Commissioners changed the school impact regulations to more accurately reflect the cost of land values throughout the county. The new values vary according to location within Eagle County. Enclosed you will find a listing of the new established values per acre. Please review these values and if you would like to comment on the new assessments, call the District Office at 328-6321. The school district is also requesting that the Town of Vail consider adopting regulations for land dedication similar in language and value to the present county regulations. The Eagle County area is growing tremendously and adoption of regulations that are similar in the towns and county are critical to help offset the cost of land acquisition for new schools. Time is of the essence to enact the necessary regulations and ordinances. Please discuss this very important issue with the Town Council members and let us know where we can be of assistance. If the council is willing to adopt new regulations, please contact our office. We are very willing to work with your staff to initiate the new Subdivision Requirements for your Planning and Zoning Regulations. Thank you for your time in considering this matter. 5'ncerely, Dan Corcoran, President Eagle County School District Board of Education 0 Commissioner moved adoption of the following Resolution: ~ ^ y' 1 Lr BOARD o~ coU~tTY coISSIO~vERS < j ~ PPP COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF' COLORADO RESOLUTIOh~1 RTO o 9 ° ITT TgiE P~IATTER OF CAS~i I~ LIEU OF' SCIiOOL LAND DEDICATIOhlT PURSUAhVT TO 30°28°133 CoRoSo, AYVD 2 0 18 o O1 EAGLE COUATTY LA8~1D USE REGULATIORIS Tt~iEREAS, the Board .of County Commissioners of Eagle, State of Colorado (hereinafter the "Board"), is authorized, pursuant to State enabling legislation including, but not limited to, C.R.S. 30-28-101, et sea., to plan for and regulate the use and development to land in the unincorporated territory of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity, and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the County of Eagle; and Tn7YiEREASo the Board is directed by Section 2.18.01(p) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to determine and set annually the current market value of unimproved land on an acre basis; and ~1FIEREAS, the Board, with recommendations from the School Districts, has established values to be used for fees in lieu of land dedication; and 6~iEREASo the Board, not having revised the land values for ten years, determine, for the purposes of 2.18.01(p), to be as follows with the boundaries of the precincts whose boundaries have been previously set by the Board: Full Market Value Common Name Precinct Per Acre of Area Precinct 1 $50,000 Red Cliff Precinct 2 $50,000 SW Vail Precinct 3 $50,000 Minturn Precinct 4 $50,000 Edwards Precinct 5 $10,000 Eagle Precinct 6 $10,000 Gypsum Precinct 7 $10,000 Basalt Precinct 8 $10,000 E1 Jebel Precinct 9 $ 7,500 Sweetwater Precinct 10 $ 7,500 Burns Precinct 11 $ 7,500 Bond/McCoy Precinct 12 $50,000 NW Vail Precinct 13 $50,000 Vail Precinct 14 $50,000 East Vail Precinct 15A $50,000 Avon Precinct 15B $50,000 Avon Precinct 16 $ 7,500 E. Eagle Precinct 17 $50,000 Eagle-Vail NOW, THEREFOREo BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COAgA2%SS%ONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EAGLEo STATE OF COLORADOe THAT the following are established as value per acre to be used in various formulas to calculate the cash to be paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 2.18.01(p): Full Market Value Common Name Precinct Per Acre of Area Precinct 1 $50,000 Red Cliff ~2~•~S Precinct 2 $50,000 SW Vail Precinct 3 $50,000 Minturn Precinct 4 $50,000 Edwards Precinct 5 $10,000 Eagle Precinct 6 $10,000 Gypsum Precinct 7 $10,000 Basalt Precinct 8 $10,000 El Jebel Precinct 9 $ 7,500 Sweetwater Precinct 10 $ 7,500 Burns Precinct 11 $ 7,500 Bond/McCoy Precinct 12 $50,000 NW Vail Precinct 13 $50,000 Vail Precinct 14 $50,000 East Vail Precinct 15A $50,000 Avon Precinct 15B $50,000 Avon Precinct 16 $ 7,500 E. Eagle Precinct 17 $50,000 Eagle-Vail The Board determines these values should be used, subject to the provisions of 2.18.01(p) of the Eagle County Land Use 0 Regulations, until a further determination is made by the Board. TIiATo this Resolution is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. MOVEDo READ ARTD ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the day of 19 COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO By and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY ATTEST : COPRP~I S S IONERS By: By: Clerk to the Board of George A. Gates, Chairman County Commissioners By: Johnnette Phillips, Commissioner By: James E. Johnson, Jr., Commissioner Commissioner seconded adoption of the foregoing resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Commissioner George A. Gates Commissioner Johnnette Phillips Commissioner James E. Johnson, Jr. This Resolution passed by vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. . G • ~ - r, ~ r. _ ~ EAt;LC COUNTY RUIII~1NC; ~ . - _ :~51 QRtIMWAY ro. Q~,x esu - OPffCC QF I HE ~ , : FABLE. CC1tORADQ B 163 I COUNTY AAANAGFR (303} 328.8605 `~s.•.. FAX: 13031 328.1207 ~~~f:~~ tib~~0 C7 0 U 9 . ~®Po 1Vll 1G YVll ~11~ ~ !"~l 1V HJ/ LLJ itlll T®: 119 n ~ n•~Il~ ~'~T~~ ~®~E E~ l F~®k3fl: lIl`3(C~'~11~, 4~Q.~t3iiLll(C fl81~Il.A~'II'IlQIIi~~ ~ lLIl1~Q] ®l~ ~ECI~~A~ ?.,,ARdI~ IL~~I~QCATfl~I~ I~~I~ 1~flS~~JS3g~N~ ?Il~t~~dedl pia ~n~ ~?~e n»e~~ted ¢®a ~?a~aa~~~ o¢ ttie >~ew esa ?acezl of sc? ~dne~ti ffee~ Frith ~e lE~g?e ~®aIl.tIltp ~:®mm'~n _ 'fl'hc d~sc~sAOIla n$ ~?eedu?ed f~ ml~~ 7, fl~ ~t fl®:~ ~.ffi. i~ ~gfle ~~n~ }~~m, ~~0 ~r®ad®vay, ~g?e. 'fl°~ ' ~i ~d~ fees ~®vembe~ fl ~cfleet ehanges i~ ®et ~~~e~ nIln istlneik~ ~®~ghe~et l~gle ~a~Iln The an Ilieu t~ n~ ealc>~ated b~ ~ f~~ that nr~t® ~c® t ~ ~~ue ~d mii~ level®pe~. ~i®~ ~ ~dj ent, lit d~~e a~g iml lEagle ~®~ty ~s~s se¢ ~5, ac>re. lJsnr~g the ff>~rs ~al~, t~ vn®na$ u~ Ilae~ ®f fee ~~?e t®~ eost ~ levels ®f ~7 fl ~ ~i¢. Tl~e tme~ ~ ?ie~ ®ff fey ~ ?~®d ®~L?ue~ ~Lt ~5®, ~~e • ¢o ~~®a~ai[e~te?y B ~ an~mnd. //yy~~ 'Il he}~~~1®~m~~n®>z~~~§e.Q} t~~e Qffa~~Q?~j?® g jet ~~?m~ ~o~vem ~ ~ : ~~eea~~.c~t~? 7Y~.+~®q ~,n(~®~tl6(~g~~~y LL9serIS !y- K3{~'~~@p ~}4~~ 7j17 ~?~p ~r41 ~a~~' ~~7p1WY&l~9 JCIl U `fF- .17.9'611y if tl ~i~,~~'LL ~~~11®9 ~e~9 ~9.i~n~C.~ ~ ~FL®y (r~9 gv p ~ " y~~ ~g®ta,~~e¢ G¢~p 1~~q>~~~Q ~~p°~~yylp®, Q ~~y~~1 label®~~p _Il~'g~e~cLinct~ 9?p° ,71~SD,Oay~ Ap~~Y~ ~61G@i~, R~y(l~ifyl8~l4wlL~ ~ 1~~D~~eI/.t,t6~R~r} 11~4~iASi~u/+7~9 u uv~w]W~~A~p d ? ° W+'~p~ ,Q~Y761~11/E~~E~~r~b/~Y9 1CA~'.~~°IL p ~8'(1~ \7~111~p 1C F1~6rtitlerools ll~^ ~7.Dq&9 ~1 ~T`°°'°~9 ~-°0 ~~®gVVOO V~nIly, ~ fl~~ , ~Av®e~y, I;in~ fl~~ ~5®, ~Av®~~, ]]~rr~n~et fly- ~7, vel , e?~tea? ® ~d ® aIl~~rested ~utie~ hive ge~~estled ~ ni¢~ ~ tl~viL~~ t?~ a?~~t ff®S flish~g s®sr~e$ ~alue~. 'the cC® - ioner~ v~ uew~l ¢lhe ssor' ®£fn~ n-egudang t sales i~ Bch of the precincts adja ><et n~~~ nor ' ~°~E ~A AfIAY ~E ~1J~J~~ '9'~ Q" ~1C ~°®~®~~~~'u Tl~~ Il~I~C~JSSfl®DB. ~o~ inf'~~~.sti®n9 pl c®nB~t n~ ~Q the ~ ' ffi knee ~t ~~~-~6®~. X e ~ CO+a.~tcc,~ d ~ ~~~~IVE® P3~~ 2 ~ 19~~ • . ° DECEMBER 1993 . , e ~ • ~ 994 Brings New Colorado wage Withholding Regulations Effective Jan. 1, 1994 new Colorado payments by electronic funds transfer will be treated as having zero tax liability wage withholding regulations will take (EFT). foranypaztofthelookbackperiodthatthey effect. The new regulations will closely ®Seasonal Filers: employers who did not have a withholding account. All parallel federal withholding rules. Quar- operate a business for only part of the new accountswillbequarterlyfilersduring terly, weekly and monthly filers will re- calendar yeaz and who do not have Colo- the calendaz year in which the withholding ceive coupon books for 1994 filing peri- radowagewithhholdingwhenthebusiness account was opened. Except for weekly ods. All monthly and weekly filers will is not operating. Employers must obtain filers, a return must be filed for each period also receive written notification of their DOR approval for seasonal filing status even if no taxes have been withheld. newfilingstatus. Filing requirements will and inform DOR of the months in which Colorado withholding tax tables be based upon the amount of Colorado there will be withholding. Due date: fif- will not change this year. withholding employers collect annually: teenth day of the month following each For more information, call the DOR ® Quarterly Filers: withholding is month of operation. Forms Hotline, (303) 534-1408, and re- lessthan $7,000. Due date: last day-of the Pazalleling federal withholding rules, quest newly revised FYI Withholding 5 month following the close of the calendar theDepartmentofRevenuewilldetermine "Colorado Withholding Tax Requirements" quarter. whether an employer will be a seasonal, (DRP 1872). ® Monthly Filers: withholding is at quarterly, monthly or weekly filer based least $7,000, but not more than $50,000. on an annual review of the amount of Due date: fifteenth day of the following Colorado withholding tax that the em- ~ - ~ ~ ~ month. ployer reported during a "lookback pe- _ ®V1~eekly Filers: withholding exceeds riod"--the most recent 12-month period of ~ ~ ~ ~ $50,000. Due date for taxes accumulated July 1-June 30. For example, for the 1994 You can now arrange to receive as of any Friday: third business day follow- calendaz year, DOR looked at withholding quarterly reports from the Department ingthatFriday. Employerswhowithhold tax reported for the period July 1, 1992 of Revenue containing the names of more than $50,000 annually must file through June 30, 1993. New employers individuals in your area who have reg- istered theirmotorvehicles outside their . city of legal residence, thereby avoid- ing the payment of appropriate sales New Recycled Tire fee tax on the vehicles. For eachentry,the list contains name, address on current driver's license, address used on the Starting Jan. 1, 1994, retailers of new tires aze required to collect a $1 fee on vehicle registration, vehicle cost, and every "waste"motor vehicle tire turned over to them by the tine owners. Fees go the year, make and model of the ve- tothe Waste Tire Recycling Development Cash Fund to encourage development of hicle. techniques for recycling and reuse of waste tires, to study the feasibility and cost- If you would like to receive these efficiency of creating grants to transport waste tires to other users, and to generally quarterly lists for your locality, contact address problems created by the disposal of waste tires. Motorcycle tires aze the Colorado Municipal League, (303) excluded from this law. 831-6411, which is co-ordinating the The fee is not collected on tires that will be recapped or ground up for reuse, program with the Department of Rev- e.g., for road construction material or energy production. If the recapping or enue. You will be chazged aset-up fee reprocessing is not done in-house, the retailermust have acontract with arecapping for this service, payable to CML. This or reprocessing company to accept all its waste tires. Otherwise, the retailer must feeisbaseduponthepopulation ofyour collect the fee. If the retailer is unsure whether the tires will be recapped or area. In addition, there will be a small reprocessed, the fee must be collected. Collection of this fee applies only to quarterly fee based upon the length of retailers. each list generated. 1, t Tax Exempt Vehicle Sales ~ ° ' p To Native 14mericans ~I~ ~ Dealerships making sales of motor vehicles to Native Americans who live on ? The 1993 edition of the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Handbook will be available their tribal reservation no longer have to for pickup at the Colorado State Association of County Clerks convention in Fort deliver a vehicle onto the reservation in Collins. order for the sale to be tax exempt. Sales of motor vehicles to Native Americans are ? If you are receiving monthly vendor sales tax reports from the Department of not subject to sales tax if the purchaser is an Revenue and your name or address changes, be sure to notify the DOR at (303) 866- enrolled tribal member living on the tribal 4359. You will be sent a new Memorandum of Understanding so you can continue reservation. The purchaser must be able to to receive the reports. document tribal affiliation and residency to be exempt. This exemption applies ? If you are having trouble accessing motor vehicle leasing information on the whether delivery of the vehicle takes place Colorado Registration Information System (CRIB), call the Motor Vehicle Help on the reservaton or at the dealership. The Desk, (303) 572-5713. tax exemption also applies to the spouse of a tribal member as long as the member's ? Tamper-proof temporary license plates are a success. According to Colorado affiliation and residency is documented law enforcement officials, fraudulent use of temporary plates has fallen dramati- and the vehicle will be co-owned and co- cally. The temporary plate combines a hologram with a plastic shield making it registered. impossible to reproduce or alter. There have been approximately 1.5 million temporary plates issued since the new plate was introduced Jan. 1, 1993. Electronic Filing Pilot ? If you are interested in organizing a class or workshop on sales taxes for city/ ®During the 1994 tax season, the county officials, an association or vendor group in your area, contact Reilly Department of Revenue will explore the Cunningham at the Department of Revenue, (303) 866-3108. potential of allowing Coloradans to file state individual income tax returns elec- tropically. This pilot project, conducted in j ~jjj~j~jj j cooperation with the Internal Revenue Ser- vice, will be limited to a small number of New ~nterprLSe ZOne returns, so that the system can be thor- Contri~utlonS Guidelines oughly tested before the electronic filing option is offered to the general public in New guidelines have been formulated businesses to create or retain employment 1995. Jackson-Hewitt, a private software by the Department of Revenue for indi- through activities of a public or and tax preparation fum, has been desig- viduals wishing to claim the income tax nonproprietary nature (for instance, small Hated as the pilot filing service. credit for private contributions to a Colo- business management assistance); rado enterprise zone administrators. The • BGghtRehabilitation:encouraging /VeK/ ~~~CQt/011 contribution, made either in cash or in- the physical rehabilitation and economic The 1993 edition of The Com- kind services, must be used for activities revitalization of blighted areas identified pleteBookofFYls isnowavailable. It having a direct effect on improving the for special attention in the zone develop- is a complete, updated set of approxi- economic condition of the zone, through: ment plan. mately 125 fact sheets dealing with • Zone Administration: supporting Activities must be carried out di- various sales, income, excise and fuel the agency designated as the enterprise rectly by the enterprise zone administra- ~ topics. Price is $8; supplies are zone administrator; tor, or pursuant to an agreement between • Marketing: promoting the enter- the zone administrator and a local govern- limited. prise zone as a location for business Bevel- mental entity within the zone or anot-for- Order by mail or in person through opment, tourism, film production, or Simi- profit organization whose primary pur- the State Forms Center, 4200 Garfield lar markets targeted by the local zone pose is among those listed. A zone admin- St., Denver, CO 80216. A $2.50 development plan; istratormay notpasscontributionsthrough shipping charge and applicable sales • Infrastructure: acquiring and/or to organizations that serve primarily as tax must accompany each order. No improving publicly-owned infrastructure fund-raising intermediaries for other or- telephone orders are accepted, but you which will support the economic develop- ganizations, nor to charitable organiza- may call (303) 321-4164 to verify tax ment objectives of the local zone develop- lions which implement zone economic and price. ment plan; development activities only incidentally. cityacanryConneaionsspublisned • Facilities: investing lp publicly- For more information on this credit, 9uerterly end mailed to city and county governmental oHiciels. Questions end sponsored facilities responsibleforretain- request FYI Income 23, "Tax Credit for ~mmenrseiewelcomeandsnouldbesenr ing or creating employment; Private Contributions to Ente rise Zone to: City 6 County Connections, Colorado Department o/Revenue, Room 220, 1375 • Business Assistance: assisting local Programs" (DRP 1833). sne~man sc, Denver, co. so2s1. vim. , - - AL r r~it c~sh~ r in ~a~rd of the VVMB. of the Vail Valley Marketing Board 13y Kristin Kenney Sales-tax collections weighted by and the creation of a Vail Marketing Dairy Scary writer _ lodging revenues determined the con- Board. tribution breakdown, Britz said. Currently, Vail funds 75 percent - The momentum is back in the Vail Beaver Creek has put forth afour- of the total budget. The town has not Valley Marketing Board's corner tiered proposal from the resort com- yet authorized its proposed contribu- after Beaver Creek Resort Co. put a pany that has the support of Vail lion for 1994. proposal on the table that includes a Associates Inc. Vail Mayor Peggy Osterfoss has $100,000 contribution toward nation- '°We felt that the issues Beaver described the marketing board as "a al and regional marketing efforts. Creek raised about cooperative sum- model program" of a successful pub- Theproposal came after the Avon mer marketing efforts were the same lic/private relationship. However, she Town Counci! voted last week not to as ours," said Bob Kunkel, vice pres- said she feels that it would not make contribute $90,000 to the board. ident of marketing for VA. • sense to market other areas without The council rejected the annual In addition to its $100,000 contri- valleywide partnership in advertising contribution to the marketing board bution, the Beaver Creek position funding. with a 4 to 2 vote, claiming its prior- calls for the reconstruction of the "Both Vai] Associates and Beaver hies had changed and that the mar- marketing board; equal representa- Creek Resort Company support the keting board's money should come tion of the two reservations and book- concept of a cooperative valleywide from the private sector. ing agencies (the VaillBeaver Creek effort, and that is an important step," The valleywide marketing board, Resort Association and the Vail Val- Britz said. "We're being forced into a which formed in 1989 with the pri- ley Tourism and Convention situation where everything is going to mary goal of promoting ayear-round Bureau), an evaluation of the board's have to come to a head soon. We are economy in the Vail Valley, gener- mission and goals, and a commitment two months behind in our planning ales its $684,000 budget from contri- to accurate tracking and accountabil- schedule." butions that include a $349,000 Vail ity procedures with regular reporting. Britz said VA and Beaver Creek business license fee; $160,500 from "Due to the ever-changing envi- "are two different entities and need to the Town of Vail; $90,000 from ronment, we feel a new board's first be treated separately in this coopera- Avon; $50,000 from Vail Associates priority is to revisit, review, and re- live effort." Inc.; and $35,000 of miscellaneous establish the purpose and goals of the ~ . private contributions, including mon- VVMB," Beaver Creek's report on "Whether the amount is $100,000 ey from Arrowhead at Vail. the issue reads. "The demise of the or less, more of my concern is that it The board uses the money for Colorado Tourism Bureau removes is the fair-share amount," saidd Britz. advertising, group sales, public rela- $12 million of large umbrella promo- "We are a creature of a Town of Vail lions and an 80-page summer guide. tional activity from the marketplace. ordinance and we take our direction Last month, Beaver Creek denied Two-thirds was directed at summer, from the Vail Town Council." the Vail Valley Marketing Board a ~ and 50 percent (6 million) was in requested contribution of $180,000. advertising." Britz remains "cautiously opti- Marketing board officials came up "I think it's a good plan because mistic," recognizing problems with with the $180,000 request after the alternative is not a good plan," strings attached to the recent propos- "looking at a variety of fair-share Kunkel said. al, and Avon not wanting to be part of equations," said Tom Britz, chairman The alternative is the dismantling the VVMB. Ski cony an sa s East Vail p Y ~ course not bein considered g "Vail Associates and the cam- at a possible site for a new course th; By David O. Williams paign committee (the Vail Valley would be one of the best in.the worl~ Daily stall writer Foundation) are looking on Vail "I think the seed is out there for i Vail Associates Inc. officials Mountain for an appropriate site fora new course) for the World Champ Tuesday denied a downhill .race downhill," Palmer said. "That's real- onships bid," Major said Saturda~ course is being.considered in the East ly what it boils down to." "and the seed is out there for tI Vail- chutes as part of the ski eompa- Nothing outside of the existing ski future of the World Cup. ny's bid to land the 1999 World azea which would require a Forest "It ties into a much bigger pla Alpine Ski Championships. Service permit is being considered, than just the World Cup. And if the U.S. Ski Team head coach Paul Palmer said. do it, it's going to be, if not the bey Major said Saturday at a World Cup One knock on Vail in the past has one of the best downhills in tl race in Pazk City, Utah, that VA was been its lack of an adequate downhill world. It's going to be somethir seriously looking at building a down- course for men's World Cup compe- else." hill course in East Vail to bolster its tition. However, skiers on the chances of landing the champi- Women's circuit, which has been Palmer said.Tuesday that any ne "onships. - • stopping in Vail the past several course will be within the ski are However, VA spokesman Ross Years, have been pleased with their boundaries. In 1989, whe Palmer said Tuesday that simply isn't downhill course on International. VailBeaver Creek hosted the Wor] the case. Major said Saturday he had heard Championships, the men's •downhi that VA was in the process of looking course was a[ Beaver Creek. Scho®I b®ard to discuss Lan e g da and was being legally posted, but No decisions concerning Lanl By Marka Moser he would not make further comment. were made before newly electe Daily smart writer No decisions were made at a Mon- board members Dan Leary, Pati day night executive session meeting Cross and Steve Miller were sworn The Eagle County School District of the school board at Edwards Ele- along with continuing board men released a revised agenda Tuesday mentary School, Corcoran said. bers Don Marks, Raenette Johnsc morning, adding personnel matters to Lange was hired as superintendent and Gerry" Sandberg, according today's special school board meeting in May 1992, following an extensive Corcoran. at 4:30 p.m. at Battle Mountain High nationwide search. He was given a A rumor that a recall of boas School. three-yeazcontract. members was being organized w. Superintendent John Lange said He was evaluated last spring by denied by a member of the Citizen that the personnel matter concerns the school board that hired him. Prior Committee for Quality Educatio him, but he would not comment to the departure of Mary Jo Allen, who wished to remain anonymou about a possible resignation from his Lissa Mackintosh and Sandy Rose Although information on a recall h, position or dismissal by the school from the board in October, a second been requested from the Colorac board. School board president Dan evaluation was made. However, Cor- Association of School Boards by tl Corcoran said the personnel matter coran would not comment about the group, no action has been taken I had been added to the original agen- evaluations. that committee. ~ < December 1, 1993 v ~ ~ 1 t ~ ~ ~t~ld taxi . Beaver Creek should participate in valley work together on at least one the valley-wide marketing effort, thing. This, in more ways than one, has although it should determine the pulled many entities together to work amount of the on a single goal - participation itself, bringing more accor ' o the to t dm t eo le he Vail numerous callers Valley so that we re ar t is i ht all h dm h m ave a g g g weeks uestion. better oat' This tt. q g We asked our program is ar more readers last week important today what they thought about Beaver Creek because of the defeat of the state . Resort Company's reluctance to tourism tax. There has to be somebody participate in the valley-wide marketing out there who's working for all of us effort by the Vail Valley Marketing and not just trying bring people to his Board. Since we asked that question, we particular attraction." learned that Beaver Creek is willing, in ~ "If Beaver Creek doesn't wish to part, to participate, but with a bunch of participate, it shouldn't have to. We've conditions attached. made it this far -and I'm assuming the In short, it's willing to budget program has worked - so let's just $100,000 (the marketing board asked continue with it and stop the threats. I for $180,000) if the marketing board is do think that Avon's excuse - if Beaver willing to restructure its board to Creek doesn't participate either should include the Beaver Creek Resort we, is crap. Avon has benefited from Company board and several other this, even more so than has Vail." entities. ~ "It's not a question about Beaver Please remember while reading this Creek's ability or willingness to column that it is not a scientific survey participate, it's the issue of how valid but rather the opinion of our readers. the Vail Valley Marketing Board's efforts For more on what our TIPSLINE are. They seem to take a lot of credit for callers thought about this issue, please a lot of other people's work. Obviously read on: Avon feels the same way. There are 4~ ° "Of course Beaver Creek should questions whether in Vail it's very valid." pay money into the valley-wide ~ I think something better happen marketing deal. If they are making half for the summer. If Beaver Creek doesn't of what the papers say they are making, contribute to the marketing board, it they should toss in a million dollars. I should come out with a public do think that Beaver Creek should statement stating exactly what it is decide what is best for it, however. And doing on its own to bring people here in if it really wanted to be politically the summer. Why is the Beaver Creek correct, it would donate more than Resort Company trying to keep this so what the marketing board is asking for." hush-hush?" "I could have told you five years "The answer, to me, is that the Vail ago what direction Beaver Creek was Valley Marketing Board has to go out going. It's the snobbish place for rich and hire some big-name research firm and weird. The excuse, 'we don't think and have it prove that the marketing the marketing board is drawing the board's efforts are wor--king. Even if RIGHT kind of people to our resort,' is there is no question on the part of the BS. Does Beaver Creek mean people marketing board that it works, there are who can afford $500 a night lodging? people who will always question the Open up the wallet and cough it up results. Spend the money. It would Beaver Creek." likely take only time to convince people "If nothing else, what the that it is working." marketing board has done is to help the - . , December 1, 1993 ~ F"rs:T ~::::>;:C~z~'~ :<~':q:w:4`~4:b>~>:oi~° ;max w.>.2 4>:::>.. at 5:30 p.m., ,.m., Eagle County f, and Sunday at ~ - in,cipal Build,ng. _ 13. ? ~ - S -ARE YOU w I'r®per~y Manager Ivocates can help. i-7384, ask for an ~r vrvc Responsible for the management of homeowner's associations, t7 GROUP meets condominium associations and luxury home care. Duties include fourth Wednesday bu et administration, subcontractor liaison, customer relations .ibrary Community information call and staff supervision. n, 476-5695 or a7s-1a3s. Successful experience in comparable position required. Excellent career opportunity. IAS con el alcohol. en espanol to invi- No tele hone calls lease. Submit resumes with Sala histo to: dos a las 7 de la P P ry n' Asia Bautista de Property Manager Position ormacion Ilamar. 1'.O. Box 3418 Vail, CO 81658 NYMOUS. Beaver -ues. 8:00 p.m. , , - , , 31dg., Fri. 7:00 p.m~ act Jay at 653-4421 ~\tn~ 4. I/" _ C~JR~1+L,~ Executive Assistant - Jointhe dynamic team at Vail's premier community as executive assitant to the CEO. Responsibilities include scheduling appointments, making travel arrangements, composing Must be a correspondence, and typing of statistical and legal documents. h21pfU~. This individual must also be able to assist and manage multiple managers and tasks. Qualified applicants must be detail oriented, have good organizational skills, have excellent : knowledge of WordPerfect, and possess prior experience as an ps t0: executive assistant. Submit resumes to: O 81620. H.R. Manager, Cordillera ,zn-,o P.O. Box 988, Edwards, CO 81632 EOE ,v,-,2.a in High School - - 3-94 J1 t \ i~ _ e4 T®i~2V ~F YAIL _ - - 75 South Frontage Road fail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 BiI~I1A~~~AT~ R~~~~~~ December 2, 9993 Contact: Steve Thompson, Finance ®irector 479-2 9 9 6 T®W9~ ®F VA6fL NA?~AES ~iNANC~ C®N`TR®LLER (!/ail}--Christine S. Anderson is the Town of Vail's new finance controller. Anderson was selected from a field of 23 candidates, and will manage the town's accounting operations. Anderson is a 9 0 year resident of the Vail Valley and was formerly employed by Mci\fiahan and Associates, an auditing firm based in Avon. Her appointment became effective ~lov. 29. ~ ~ ~ . . `1'own~of hall Ago ~ f~ax° 0®~ 4TH ~l ~ . s °I°hank yon for your fie of November 29..1 em very sorry about.our °sibli rival as headlined our ehuatfon oortoeming the 1999 work! alpine pions ,but 1 . ned the v~fiy lrr ~ Ietter ~ John cSamsey quiet some time e~ (see rosure)o . - _ ~I rvasr~~s w?i ~9lou th V®ilevi~nt in 1 . f a ~~~ure y~au that were no - - bid 1 returned firom , er US trip end. of l1Aay'83 the situation had „ ~Iy cfiaitged, ai leak officially .did us that th would ewt bid an and thereforetiTMade ~ e another swiss ' - ~ ;resort to bid. If wv heq riot irrmr~r+ertobed, anc1herf>wisa Id httvo dono k i ~ - ~ hQd blocked our ct~nces for the next five to ~c years (as laax did fore). of oouree _ - _ 1 ehvays pointed out herd, that Vain is our,slater clty:8nd thaf I informed a differently half ~ ar.e8o, but ovarybody reed, that.8t. tVlorftx could'not miss that . so did my~ - ~ - Chaim ar~d bosa, Hugo etzel, who. Is~also head of the organizir~ ca mitbee, eo did ~uge~. Petero~the.rnayor of .Pontresine, who is head of the ®xeoutlve corn did our ena . Conaido ObvFtnc~, member of the oomrrrfinee and eA on. So rrty rather it situatlon here. ~nr gtad to learn about your plans f o coins to St. tlAorttz on J 17o datie pose fine with. us and: we e!I look forward ~ seetr~ you here. Please contact a Palmy from I 'the Sonrtenalp to assist you in planning arrd orgsnizlnp the , and let know 9 we cstn help you with our Iinks and larow-how fa the otter des you part >q visit n Europe. ARer dour meeting wrim Annemarie.you could. ~t us Ie~ow, wr~rcn par>g 01 st rite you eu+® oulariy eo that we set ~ an attraotir~ programme them. ~w.e ~p ~y~,~ D _ 971Y 0 6/B8E ll/YOIII~ , ~ . ` { 'Sf . SAE. I~. D . .i.7.: . :1 .4 - ~ . 1 ~ ' - - rrado Ciiovenop r of st. tillorflg 0?~~u~zi Commftb_ee 1 p991Norld Alpine trptonshipc I ~6'labo Mel~r~~ Hotel®Yai1 Yet loo~d, bl~ o~/ ~,0119009: Modtt, Sdwoa. Se~aknd,ld, 0013 p/i, kc 061 ~ 29Sq ®2-DEC-1993 19a ~8 . ST° P'i~ITZ TOlJRIST ~FICE ¢41 82 3 ~9 52 P° ®1 ~ . ~ A~agganet i~sterfosss Ma~oY9 Baal . Fe$ @~ Il ~ X79 ~~37q g.~. . dVpp4oe gq710~' ~~8 ~ Nl1~Ht6d Pe'3 . !S ~e~mbe8 ~ g993 ~'a~lcfl ° ~s° Mans l~e~r ~anns~r9 °d~E l~effir fey ~?1.4~ anal our arnnsa~al si4~aatloa~ I..t lws should tely a~a3cs ®ut flea best of fe° ~r sresorts are kind ot,-~~ -~,,,...ratlag for th seine weddang°° °i'hcy like each other but are actierehcless rivals° what an exc llent story for t~ medial H suggest ehst .~a?g ~hou%d . invie~ Riisffi for a cocktail on 3 uar3? 219 1994 an . Zurich =after Y~ visig ~ Ste ~Ioritz° We could gr+es~nt these braadnew and at #tst head = t~ results ®f ®ur a?eeting is St. Morltz aacluding r mad- and ~oagterm sistership-plane° ~ addition 'v?~ would dwell grep ) an8wer their qucstaoas about ®ur rivalry concesnin~ - 99° `T'hence is ao bctetr sad more effective way. Yo atttsYCt Switzerland°s snd at least part of Euavpe°s e~keati n Eo email, (Beaver Lek) thaw tide ew®tiox~l caasstsllatioia~ - auzd "background. Pleas , discuss it ®vatla " Bohn y9 ~'at end ~Orol who aa~ ~perts; on thas field° 0 ~ aYry cootactcd the ~~~...~Ya84s ~ ~~~..ght .80. c Vaifl a ~+oar aka °~lacy boiong t4 tho best and w d 6e~aaaaiy ~hve to co~itoc ~ tlt~err infotaon fob ®r Va~l..° 1~9 ace me I~ y~r onion soou9 vvc ~n gropc~ly pl the ruedia c~to . ~ bey a hes and regagdse~ lam s ~au~r9 admit . ~ cc o gIng® ~Vl ° , . R, Nleloher ~~,E ~ - . arkas ~c8 d~ • e ~f 8oha II vastly ate ~ x~~.~+~:.s.~?t&tiYC fr9m C#armisch , Wh® . a~ off' ad ItaF/~ ~d ~1~xk~hx°~tre~itl St~ ~ 11~®rit~9 ~ 7~Op ~ ~iorYtk~9 ~°~flo ~ ~ ~~9 ~~o os2 ~ ~ ~4 s z~-a~~.-a» s r~ „as a i um a s s i uuR a a i t.irr a t.t. tsbi GG J CJ JG P', Il Ito Morino citizens Votes °1~~~ to ~Yorl Gha piortships ~ ~h® voters of fit. i~or~ gave a strong °yes` to the candidacy r the downhill ~ ~!®rfd Ski Championships at tho poil~ on November 28:9 (fi7.7® 96) voted for the evento (32.30 voted a®ainst. °i'17ree da earlier the 9 citizens ®f P®rrtresina clearly cast their °go-ahead° vote at th it bcal town ~ meeting Q75 9~ °y . . . Il ~ ~ nth positive results nflrmed the stron® rants the candida has anchored Il Il within the refit®n. VYith f of the strong support of the to I population the n ~ngadlne has a v®ry d base upon~:whiCh to present thei nomination to b ~ h®st the VVorBd Charhpi~nships at th® meeting of the IntBm 'oval Ski ~ ~ ~lsso~atiora (FISH in ~i® in dune, ~99~. ~armisctt-Partenkir h®n IrD ~I ~ ~®rmany ~d ttw ~S~ rt V®il, Colorado ~ whic:h is the s er city of St. . fl ~ Morin ~ ar® also seeking the staged downhill World SIB Ch mpiAnships, as Il ~ St. l1A~rltz neith®r hav® valid2tted the lacais° polific:al support as . - ~ ~ have tn® ~nga~rner~ ~ . ~ ® since the FIS will als® ~lebratlrig their 75th 1~nniversa In ~99~, ~e ~ ll Engadine is ~tanting cfl th®ir history. d significant picn In th® area ®f ~ ~ sld t®urism t® glue there an additB®~I ~~hance at the Cham onships. . . ~ 4 in 192fi ~d again in ~ g4fi St. Moritz hosted the only ~lym G VYirrter Games ~ ~ r to held i~ ~rvi~eriand° and`then icy ~ ga4 and in 107 it set the stage ~ 5 for downhill VII®rld ~Id Championship c®mpetiti®ns. For 19 ,the „ . ~ ~ecery rac® elopes and fnfrast ~ are th®ta and wait ng>..e.. ~ ~ . :.F . , d. f~!`...:.. . T ~ ~-a~~-a7xs a~r~~a 5i.~x1i~ i~m151 urritx +~1 ~ s ~ 5z ~.®5 ~ ~ the Honorary Prssiden$ of the initiative ~ornrnittee is the S ss !°ederal ~ ~ Presldentp aAdolf i. `t'h® cornrnitt®® ®f initiators finat want t® look into ~ fl the details ®f the eooioglcalp t®chnical, financial an p~rsonne8 ~3 ~ questions posed by staging the events in ®rder td prosent th inhabitants ~ ~ c~ both resorts with ~ o®i ~~e concept fairly eoon. ~niy if t e majority of ~ 4 4he silents supp®rt the candidaturep will an official plication be ~ 4 mad® t® She Onternati®nal Ski Assooiation (~lS~. °The i itiators are , ~ ~ ootwinced that a1B the expens® Involved in organizin® alp ®ski world 9 c~hamptonships is justified and that ~ with I planning ~ they brin® ~ ~ importarrrt advantages t® the whoi® regiona 4 ~ ° modernising W ~e in rune ~1~ is v ; c~=~F . 4 fl ~ Increased en®tivati®n for all ~n~rned ~ especially youth ~ n both 4 ~ ~iilages q ~ ~ w~rldvrid® publiy and advertising ~ 5~ `i'h® Engadine"s ~rnp®titivenvss is~thus ~tr®ngthened inr th facture; this ~ 6 mdunta~ign ,vaaile,~yg is nomicaily v~f~ much dependent on t urism. . ~ ~ ~'®dayp N~ th~ ~Ops f6bA®~~p ercund 3Ab0 resorts affeP skltng h lidays. 4 ~ ~?part fr®rn a?tlpine ski ~~ng, other"big ®vertts are also held ®ularly In ® the iJpper ~rtgadin®o gor ®~carrapl®a'~th® iaranuai Engadine Ski Marathon , ~ ~ ~cress untey)p dd cup events, in the 1Vordic combination ski ~umping9 g ~ etc. In add'diofl9 th® P~I® World ~harripi®nships artd the 2® nand 4~ ' ~ 33 man Sob VY~i'Id ~ ~ i®nships ~ ~ due t~ be held fi®re in 996 and ~ ~ ~~sa ~ el~. m. a~ 9 ~ ~ l®a~®~r~fj~rth®~rp~iynfo~tatioG~n ppi®pasy®~~c~opr~tgb~a t~ a /J~~ 0~1~11 `I~ 160 8®~p u 6 SQll~1a19~6p 0 ®lo NJ ~ 0 tl W' ~ . (P~ ~ ~3.99.~ sr,`:. ~-T~C-1993 1?0 49 S7 a P'~ ITZ TQ~IIR ISI' ~F I CE ~1 B2 329 S~ P° 02 a ~ . r ° ~ 4~ THE 1~®R~~ ~ galley ~on~adatio~ ~o ~'®hn ~arnsey ~hairffiamm P®st ~o~ 3d9 ~JSA~~aifl~ ~olorad® glb~S 'f'~ I ST G:-: Sao h~os'at~9 ~ ~ovenaber l~fl 1993 /AlVle . - ,.r, ' ~O Alp II~ ~ •ari1D~oH~9 1~~9 - ~~hn ge Gillett ~aa,~ed t® ~+Ielcher9 Toni K~igi and ianfranc~ Kasper in ~ ~eetin~, that ~aflIl associates and the t®wn ®f i~ai1 n°t fees . . comfortable ~bo~t a ~®ssibl® candYdatur® of Vat's sis r cgty Sto Nlorit~ for the ®V®r1d Alpine Ski ~haffipionships 1999 withou previous ~format~dn° Sinc® things hCa~ have devcl~,~,~,ed vcxy ass and aincc ®nr definite candidatt~ .,~ep~nds the results ®f tv~?o P blic referendoms ~ ~®ntresina anal ~t_ Nl~itg enai ~f this month, eve o ginally wanted to ~infoa~ y®tt ab®ue puns early . decesnbera If the ferendums should negatived theme ~r®uldu°t b~ a ~didat?~e by GIs at a ~Yo~rever the results ~ilfl .be° we consider it important, that you 'and all our mutttay friends ~vr abo~.d o~ plans at first han ° 7ro become a cu,dida~ for this b~~~ .is ffiuch more mpiicated in ~ sitnati®n ~ Y ° ~..aa~ had taken this position ver ~uany past years and let it finally go .only this springo ~°he fact at we incorporate ~~+w~ neighbo "age d~ontresina the project and v~r nce+d Lw® positive public referenduffisa maiCes gt even snore difffcnlt° If a should ®v c alg these problems and ~ ~ definitely become a candidate like Your we ~ilfl ce Y be a fair and gdt?tlemanlike rival as on can expect it 02-DEC-1993 17e5® STaMORITZ TOL~IST ~FYCE +~1 82 329 52 P. 03 :o in any respect Bh® aide of your sister cityo Since . ~orit~ hasn° t bad this event flog ¢wenty years and autce fliers have ways been other Swiss resoats int~est~ to lt„ we fast conXd not miss 's rare chanc® of doming a eandi without Swiss internal rivalry. It is end ~f °naanag t by S~x~e isa°a ®vh~ch has fortenately work out fine fir ns° at fieast u~ ~owo Pl®ase pass ®t~ friends ffiy best wishes and regards. a will keep yon inf~.g~ed on what is going ons on ottr sideo Sincerely ~oursa ~ana~ter Dan~asera l~®sides~t ~o o . George C~ettfl Vail Associates _ o ,kepi raffish erg, ®ffioial ~ Vail Ambassador e li~to el~her9 ~'gani,:in~;'~~ottee fit. ARori /~~trebina -utc:-x~,s xy=~ sr.r~a~ ~isT o~FICE +4l 82 3 ~s 52 P.02 o. ck p~ °fr ~ • ~ ~l®r~ ~~,q~nfl, ®in®r irAadian~lnfo eirn 2~ e Januar i 94 in ~ . ~ ~ , ~ 9~artdt r fir dis Atpine i~id-VVIUi 199 • 9 Q~~vr~wi yS?®c{~hwe~terr~ bevr~rber~ ~I~h .fiir die gleich~ ~1 ~ ®ie beiden ~chwest®rorte /Coiorada and En®adin Il 4 werben sioi't ff~r die ~ieictte Sici WM ~ ein®'~mili rrl~ffaire`? e ~5 Il~ ~ • II wit die ~ev~ik®run~'von Pcntresina and St. NA®ritz nc1~ A ~ !`!®vetnbe6 ~~t ~'b~4Q bxw. ~i~96 Je Stimmen der itan dater ~r di® Il ~ r~9pine Skl~VVM 99~ ~ugestinz~trt habgn, trio Ste Mo errs ~1S~ ~ ~ ~C®ngr in i~io d® Janeiro ~di~sert Juni dei~nitib geg n seine. ~ Il erikanisohe i~artn~r ~~rneinde ilaii t~amit be nden rich di® ~ ~ i~id®n °i~hh~re~tern° in der ttngewbhnliohen Situa#io a eioh ~ ~ g~awis~arrna~~n ~B~ R6voii~n~n fir ~o glviahe °Hoc ze6t° ~ ~ bew®rben. ~ ~ • Vom ~ 7a ~ Jeer ist dig ~ ~ me jsterin vQr~ VIII, rs. iViargar~t e ~ ~ ~e er#o~° ~rti$ ®~tter i~i+~gaxion ih iViaritze Zw der i~eise ist ~jj ~ die/inten~ivietrs=artg ~e~ K® e~g~n®nit lQ~A.y~R?loritzyi~n~jve ~cghie/~d~eg nen Co ~ i~t+eioi'®ne .~74. ~e',~ O oYTLd ~hrd V~1A G6 1~0~4 o ~ ~ • testes in siolu Qbes' thn® Pik shit Oel6e iU1os'i~tz, de ~b-VYM and ~ ® ~ailQ d®r n Ohre ~f ailer arneriic~tnfsoiten rte. Sit~i. .~!ir v Id eb ~'®b~l ®F VA~L 75 Sor~th Frontage Road Office of the li~fayor bail, Colorado 51657 303-479-2100 F~9X 303-479-2157 , December 3, 9993 Dr. Hans Peter Danuser, President St. Moritz 'tourist Soard Kur-und Verkehrsverein, CH-75Q0 St. I~9oritz, Schweiz, Switzerland Dear Hans Peter, Thank you for your fax of December 2. We are all looking forward to our visit to St. Moritz next month (Jan. 13 and 19). Regarding .your suggestion of a joint press conference in Zurich relative to the Vail-St. Moritz sister city relationship and the campaign for the 9999 World Alpine Ski Championships, I must inform you that it is the decision of the group that we would not be in favor of such an event. While we most certainly value the sister.city program with you, the World Alpine Ski Championships bid is an extremely important project for the entire Vail Valley community. At this time, we feel that it is best to keep the World Championships campaign and the sister city relationship as separate issues. I hope you can understand this desire. Also in this regard, a press conference on January 21 would not be feasible with our schedule as plans call for us to travel to Wengen for the Lauberhorn races. Thank you for your generous offer and 1 certainly look (onward to seeing you again and continuing to build upon the sister city foundation that we have developed. Sincerely, . Margaret A. ®sterfoss Mayor SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ;11-3D-93 12 30 3033287207 3034752157;# 1/ 4 lV~vember 3~, 99g~ ~ ` [AC;iF C~iutvTYl3tnLD1N~ OFFICE bF 7HF, ~ ' , ~ P.U. 80$ 850 BIIARD OF CC~APo1155H71NFR5 , : ~ ~3a3) 328.8603 rnGl[. cc~ciRanO 9ie~1 FAX: (3()3)3~8.7~07 ~d C ~6~U 1 1~~~U..1~L~IT4 D(~D~~~~i' N~/~,~j L{~~il 1C~'~~l~d l'!d ~p ®a~~ f ; iL O ~ # 'tF i} t} 4 ~E 9F fi $ # # # # # # sk ~ ~~t. # 8 if ~S ri •k $ i! b iF iF 4 dt ~ iF & ~g/~ r,~ ~y ~p~~~/(y~Ip ~o ~a ~o' •~~p'~• y- p' pip Q~ p p~ ~p ®~:~A 4N l/~~.D~ ~V/Cq/'b'~d9 v37~oi a~®~9~1:~-•'H~~~46 Gr 11 ~LP~dAP'il O~ p' wlt of the Noly Gass Raain aI8'CtC ~.,:1''ewes, Cs~unty il/tar)ager ; t• U@~;~®- D9:d1~ l~td~~ld ~ dA~ f~t~RdK' ~~S~I~N~' P',~fill8l~~ dlTdd~A ~l~i~ rigt olohe Koty Cmss Room James R.. Fritze, County Atterney • 8~0 - ~ ~o L({tf~l~f~ , 3'~ - ~~o ~l~f~tC S~ s~l~f4i'= d~~'tE~'9t!!~a~ ~ ~"1~iFtl~t~~ Mt of ihp Naly Corse Jam . .5.. . - $P~. ~'~t!!~'Ef~Jl C~L~'tVt7~td Eagls County /twm hm»s of n routine end norrzvrrtravorsia/ neturt are Placed on the Consent celenddr to aNow the Buerd of Count y Crnpmissionera to sputd fts trma earl arlrr(ry on more impartenY lions on a lengthy apende. Any,Corrrmisaionermay request t/let en itCm be `fll=ltROVfi)"from the consdht celeruler nmf considered aepr+rately. ,9ny member of the Publio may `/iEQ(JEST` tlrsy item ba HEMO VED" Isom the Crmsant Aggpdp, ~B~idC PA ~Il~ld~ Ltnd~ Pankuctr, ACeDUlttirDg lylark ~ilverthorn, Cantrealler Approvat subjec,t,to:revtew by tt~e County IVlanager. C: iWPB! 1DOCSryDFt`Ep$,AGE _ s-: ° ~-EETg~G - The ~nee~ti~~ w~.l~. he he~~ The ~vo~rn o Lodg~.~g iS ava~.l~~le The ~h~~S~~ ~®d~e .f~, the Spec~a~. r~~e ®f 9~ ° ~he~ ~ ~ X00-~5~-326) ~.n~ ~~e~~,if~ v®~rse~f ~S a ~~ST ~e~~e~ ! G~ou~ #~06~) fc~x ~o~~ ~eSe~v~~~®~So . 'la®~o~ ~lv e ~ ~ p ~he . ~~er~ ~f 5111 ° ° ~Sd`~ ~ 1L ~ ~e ~~eSe~ ~L. ~~®~.la ~ ll~~~i~o~~ ®f ~u~~aal co~oerg~ ~ ~~ol~~~.~g the ~.e~~~~.~~~~e ~®~~c ~ o . - ° m A re~reSe~t~~~~e f~®~ the ~o~®~~® ~e~~~e~~ T~~~S~o~~a1~~.or~ v~~~.~. ~e ~~eSe~~ ~o ®f ~~~e~°es~ ~o CAST o sz:: ® Sam ~~~et w~. ~ ~~ov~~e ~~~~e ~e~~S~~t~ve SeS~~.®~o ® We w~. ~ be Sho®~ ~~g f ~e~~~~e~~ - ~f ~e~ ~~~oh f oaa~ ~.e~~.S~L~~~.~e t®~ ~~eo 0 . ~ 5 ~ P ~ T,AL ~d THE ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G~SLT~ TAU ~ _ 0 u A~e~~.~ j~~~ke~t f®~.~.®~ o See ~v~~ o ~ '{fib,} ',o ~ - '•r i _ ~I.t~' 4r.'.;' I~' \ . I _ - `y~., Eiji. i •1 TOVIIN COUNCIL COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE APPOINTMENTS TO: Town Council FR: Pam Brandmeyer , DA: November 23, 1993 RE: Committee/Task Force Appointments This is a list of all committees/task forces to which Council members have been appointed or for which they have volunteered. It is my understanding that all assignments run to the next Regular Municipal Election, November 1995. COMMITTEE/TASK FORCE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. NWCCOG Tom Steinberg alternate 2. Vail Valley Tourism & Jan Strauch & Convention Bureau Jim Shearer, alternate (formerly VRA) 3. ~ Vail Transportation and Sybill Navas Parking Task Force Peggy Osterfoss 4. CAST Jim Shearer Merv Lapin, alternate 5. VRD/Council Subcommittee Merv Lapin Paul Johnston 6. Art in Public Places Committee Jan Strauch 7. Special Events Committee Sybill Navas 8. Bravo! Colorado Board Merv Lapin Sybill Navas 9. NWCCOG Water Quality/ Tom Steinberg Quantity Committee Sybill Navas, apprentice 10. Avon-Beaver Creek-Vai{ Regional Peggy Osterfoss Transportation Committee Tom Steinberg 11. Eagle County Recreation Merv Lapin Authority Paul Johnston, alternate 12. Town of Vail Housing Authority Peggy Osterfoss Jim Shearer, alternate 13. Channel 5 Board Jeff Atencio (Fire Dept.) 14. VIP Quality Council Member Peggy Osterfoss 15. VIP Steering Committee Members Merv Lapin Paul Johnston 16. Open Lands Committee Members 17. Vail Valley Arts Council Jim Shearer 18. CAST -Colo. Tourism Advisory Jim Shearer Board Council Merv Lapin, alternate C:\TCAPPTS.LST i ~e e4 T®~l ~F VAIL 75 South Frontage Road 6~ail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 G'®~ O~IInAE®IATE RELEASE December 3, 1993 Contact: Larry Grafel, 479-2106 Ross Palmer, 845-5721 T®ifilN VAO~.. @~AIL ASSOCIATES CIREATE JOIN' ~~?N T® BELIEVE IiOLI®AY C®NGESTION (Vail)--The Town of Vail and Vail ~4ssociates, Inc. have announced a new partnership to help ease traffic congestion along Vail's frontage roads this holiday season. Traffic has traditionally been the target of visitor and resident complaints because of long delays at the main intersections. But this season may be different. The new holiday management plan combines carpools, employee bus passes, staggered word shifts, staggered lift closings and other methods to reduce Vail's holiday traffic jams between Dec. 23 and Jan. 2. Since previous mitigation efforts have been limited to various traffic enforcement methods, town officials have high hopes for the new program. Acting Town f~lanager Larry Grafel said this year's partnership with Vail e4ssociates has been essential in developing amulti-faceted approach to the problem. "l~le applaud VA's participation in this process," Grafel said.. "The company has responded with creative solutions, and more importantly has stepped forward as a model employer." (more) .w ! . TOV-VA Partnership/Add 1 VA, for example, has purchased a block of bus passes to encourage company employees to use the Avon-Beaver Creek Transit system, Grafel said. Also, about 350 Vaif Associates employees are being asked to voluntarily stagger their arrival and departure times to reduce morning and evening congestion. On another front, Vail Associates has agreed to extend the hours of two lifts--chairs 2 and 26--to help relieve crowding at the base of the mountain, and also has extended the hours of Eagle's Nest. _ "We appreciate the efforts and the cooperation of the Town Council and its staff in dealing with this issue proactively," said Joe Macy, planning and technical manager for Vail Associates. "By extending the lift hours on chairs 2 and 26, we're hoping to take some of the pressure off of the bus system in the village by allowing people to ski to their lodge or cars rather than riding the bus as a result of inadvertently skiing to the wrong base area," he said. Vail Associates will use both signage on the mountain and a portion of its skier services staff to help guide skiers down the hill at the end of the day. Another element of the traffic reduction plan will include carpooling and staggered work shifts by Town of Vail employees. In addition, the town will offer a $1 discount on public parking if motorists wait until 6 p.m. or after to leave the parking structures. Also new this season will be a central command post to coordinate traffic control at Vail's 4-way stops and the parking structures. In addition, the town is working to establish park and ride lots in the Eagle-Vail and Dowd Junction areas. (more) TOV-VA Partnership/Add 2 "This program involves a cooperative effort between residents, guests, employers and workers," Grafel said. "We're confident this can make a difference." At peak periods, Vail's main intersection carries as many as 3,500 vehicles per hour, according to Acting Public liVorks Director Greg Hall. The goal of this year's holiday plan is to reduce traffic by as many as 500 vehicles per hour during those peak times. Effectiveness of the plan will be evaluated by traffic count comparisons, bus ridership figures, parking structure numbers; and visitor surveys. # # # ` , ~a e4 TO~I OF VAIL ~ _ _ 75 South Frontage Road 6~ail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 f~®G~ IRAAAE®IA~'E I~EL~E~~E December 3, 9993 Contact: Jody Doster, 479-2174 Transit Operations Alianager SUS RI®EIRS@ill~ ~ 9 PERCENT III VA?IL ®i/ER TIit4NFCSCIVINCa H®LI®A?Y (!/ail)--The Town of Nail's free bus system carried a record number of passengers over the Thanksgiving holiday. Ridership was up 11 percent over the same period last year. Overall, there were 30,990 passengers during Thanksgiving week, Nov. 22-28. In 9992, there were 73,219 riders during the seven-day counting period. In 9991, the figure was 63,644, up from 53,555 riders in 1990. Jody Doster, transit operations manager, said the increase this year follows a pattern of steady growth, particularly along the outlying routes. "!Ne've stepped-up our service this year on the outlying routes, which is why ridership on the 1~lest !fail route was so strong," said Doster. The !~/est Nail route experienced a 23 percent increase over last year with 18,422 riders. Next highest was the Sandstone route with a 21 percent increase and 5,019 passengers. The intown shuttle carried eight percent more riders at 45,713. The East Nail route had a two percent increase with 11,336. The town's transit system carried 3.2 million riders last year, 40,000 on New Year's Eve alone. ~ ~ ~ .l THANKSGIVING'WEEK R1®E~SHIP 1993 1992. 1991 1990 tNTOWN ~ 45,7131 42,491 39,487 39,920 EAST VAt L ~ 11,836 I 11, 590 8,848 7, 238 WEST VAt L + 18,422 ~ 14, 989 11,345 8, 851 SAN®ST®tVE + 5,0191 4,149 3,964 2,646 ~ ~ TOTALS- ~ 80,.990 ~ 73,219 63,644 58,655 i::: c ~ i''iii;f2ii?ai%>{3i'~ .~•~~~~''ri?`;. ''%i%~ .:ii `iii;:?[2?!s ~i 'iii iiy.'2 i. 'i> %%i: i`? 'i%::;~~~ `iiiiiiiiiii<iii%~>?'il?iJ~3ii'r'~i>ii>y ~ ..:1 ~ ...1. . ~ 3rd ~~apl~~ I?~~w~~~t~~~ ~ 393:;. ~r TOV HEADLINES ~ 1~~~ This month, we'd like to use this space to focus on the Employee of the Year. As most of you know, the process was changed from yeaz's past McLaurin Starts Monday and employees were able to nominate others within the Town. Below is a list of the finalists from which the director's will choose one Bob McLaurin begins his new life in Vail Monday. The town employee and one supervisor for Employee of the Yeaz. Both will be manager residence has been spruced up for his arrival: new announced at the Christmas Party on December 10. paint, carpet, tile, appliances, etc. Folks around here are pretty Supervisors Employees excited about his arrival, especially Larry Grafel! Lamy has Steve Thompson Carmen Slagle done an outstanding job as interim town manager and should be Kristan Pritz Elaine Duran applauded by all. Front office staff will be sorry to see Lanry go, Dick Duran Jim Applegate but they are certain public works is thrilled to have him back. Susan Boyd Janeil Turnbull Thanks, Larry, and welcome Bob! Diana Glenn Joe Ben Rivera Byron Stanley VIP Process has Begun Mike Rose The listing below shows all the employees who were initial ly nominated After many meetings, training sessions, and discussions, two by their peers from which the list above was narrowed. We wanted to Vail Improvement Process (VIP) Action Teams have been acknowledge all those who were honored by being nominated. formed and are currently meeting on a regular basis to take on their respective challenges. One team will take on the employee ire evaluation system and the otherwi]ldiscussdrug-freeworkplace Supervisors: Mark Benson Employees: Ela;ne Duran Dick Duran Craig Davis as a value. The two teams are as follows: Jim Spell Mark Mobley Kevin Whelan Kevin Whelan Emnlovee Evaluations Brenda Chesman, Personnel Administrative Services Supervisors: Buck Allen Employees: dd Deto Carol HaII, Bus Department Pam Brandmeyer Chris Howery Jim Hoza, Public Works Linda Moore Desiree Kochera Gary Murrain, Community Development Steve Thompson Jacque Lovato Reatha Schmidt, Finance William Uphold Georgie Steve Wright, Police Manzanares Drve Policy Marlene Rivera Carmen Slagle Tommy Collins, Police Judy Popeck Tony Cordova, Bus Department Elaine Duran, Fire Department Commupity Development Brian Hoyt, Public Works Supervisors: Kristan Pritz Community Development and Mike Mollica the Library were confused by Desiree Kochera, Community Relations the directions given on the Library ballot, and thought they could Please Help With the Holiday Supevsisors: Susan Boyd vote in one category only. Gridlock Challenge Transportation (Buses & Transmrtation Centerl As an appeal to all who must travel through the 4way stop each Supervisors: Joe Kochera Employees: Joe Ben Rivera Jody poster evening on their way home, from work, please remember the Todd Oppenheimer three-hour traffic jam last year around Christmas. The Town is Lois Hart asking everyone, to do all that is within your power to avoid Mike Rose using the 4-way between the hours of 7:30-9:00 a.m. and 4:00- police 6:OOp.m..Somesuggestionsthathavebeenofferedarecarpooling Supervisors: Diana Glenn Employees: AI Brown and flex time. If you decide flex time is your solution, please get Charlie Erickson Mike Stickney it okayed with your supervisor. Jeff Layman Jim Applegate Tom Collins Mary Palicki Jce Russell Public Works T/1 Supervisors: Todd Scholl Employees: Larry Pardee ~/1 ~tevo Rodriguez Public Wnr /Trap o motion Leo Vasquez Charlie Davis W Steve was recently granted full time regular status Greg Hall Diane Stanek P , after driving buses seasonally for several years. He is Charlie Overend Rudy Sandoval w from Gilman, Colorado, and has lived in the area for Byron Stanley Bob Manzanares 33 years. He is single and enjoys watching sports on terry Grafel Janeil Turnbull O television. Jim Hoza LeonazdSandoval Charlie Turnbull Paul Reeves. Cnmmuni Develop e»_j Bob Riggle Paul moved to Vail from Marine en St. Croiz, Minnesota, to accept the position of Environmental Health Officer. He is single and enjoys outdoor DECEMBER activities such as fat fire bicycling, music, scuba John Gulick Fire 17 Years diving, and camping. Mike McGee Fire 16 Years Mark Benson Fire 15 Years Randy Stouder. Communy'~,nevelopment Leo Vasquez Public Works~I'rans. 9 Years Corn. Dev.'s newest planner is also quite new to Vail. William Uphold Data Processing 7 Years ~ W He moved here from Virginia to accept the position J.R. Mondragon police 5 Years with the Town. He is single and enjoys skiing, biking, Sandy Yost Finance 3 Years %b hiking, and reading. Claudia Dahl Police 2 Years ~j Mary Parker Library 1 Year ~ ~ • i FAREWELL... ADIOS... Please sav Qood-bve to the followine: Jeanne Wilson Bart Rivera Public Works/Transportation Public Works/Transportation KUDOS TO JEANNE WILSON!!! VIA JIM SHEARER The followine TOV folks received $10 bonuses in October (you know, those little pink cards which are redeemed in RE: Eagle Valley Arts Festival Finance) JimwasextremelyimpressedwithJeanne'shardworkandperseverance Elaine Duran (3) Fire over the weekend. He witnessed her most excellent attitude and desire Jim Curnutte (2) Community Development to "do whatever it takes" to make the Festival go smoothly and wanted Janeil Turnbull (2) Public Works/Transportation her to know how much he and they appreciated her help!! Al Brown Police Dick Gericke Police Susie Hervert (2) Public Works/Transportation Chief of Police Barbara Joseph Police Vail Police Department Reatha Schmidt Finance Dear Sir: Desiree Kochera Community Relations Mike Vaughan Fire My family and I had the unfortunate experience of losing the drive Greg Raile (2) Data Processing train on our van at the base of Vail Pass on Tuesday, July 6,1993, on Chris Howrey Finance our way to lake Powell for our annual family vacation. Jacque Lovato Data Processing Lionel Espinoza Public Works~I'ransportation The courtesy, professionalism, and good humor of Officer Mark Bart Rivera Public Works/Transportation Allen and Officer Stoney made a potential tragedy into, at worst, an adventure. It's rewarding to see such good people as police officers and it's DECEMBER BIRTHDAYS refreshing to see police officers with such good attitudes. Brenda Chesman 12/01 Andy Knudtsen 12/17 Thank you for helping us. Ken Carpenter 12/02 Stan Anderson 12/18 Michael Gilbert 12/03 Phil Perrine 12/19 Carol Meanea 12/04 Sherri Pastwa 12/19 very truly yours, Elaine Duran 12/06 Robert Lague 12/21 The John Rodman Family Mike Trindle 12/06 Jack Owen 12/22 Claudia Dahl 12/08 David Rhoades 12/24 Paul Reeves 12/08 Mike Mottillo 12/25 Chief Richard Duran Stuart Weintraub 12/11 Rusty Jacobs 12/25 Vail Fire Department Bill Shapiro 12/12 Charlie Boomhower 12/26 Chuck Feldmann 12/13 Desiree Kochera 12/26 Dear Chief Duran: Brian Canepa 12/13 Doug Manning 12/28 Conrad Pascuzzi 12/14 Heyward Ruff 12/30 My wife and I would like you to know of the wonderful help we Gilbert Gallegos 12/15 Jason Anderson 12/31 received from Adam Graham and AI Bosworth of the East Vail Fire Ernie Chavez 12/16 Department. Congratulations Paul Reeves! Your name was drawn for this month's Roofers had tom the old shingles off our East Vail house and left the birthday present. Contact Desiree at 479-2118 about picking up roof unprotected over July 4th weekend. The rain outside almost your gift. Happy Birthday!! matched the rain that came into the house. We were at our wits end as to what to do; their caring and their efforts on our behalf were really exceptional. After very many phone calls they were able to getThank- NEW KIDS ON THE TOV BLOCK You-Masked-Man who took care of the problems to a very large extent Samantha Sharon Pardee arrived to the world on November until Monday when the roofers arrived. Their support and help was far 22. She was 6 lbs. 1 oz. and 18 3/4 inches long. Kris is beyond their call of duty - we deeply appreciated their help. doing great, and Larry (public works) is grinning from ear to ear. Sincerely, TOV EMPLOYEE SPOTLIGHT Sue and Carl Zimet The December Spotlight shines upon Tish Kochera of the Public Works/Transportation Department. Tish has one Ken Hughey of those jobs that switch seasonally and keeps her life Vail Police Department tumultuous. During the summer, Tish is in charge of the Dear Ken: mowing crew. She can be seen leading her band of mowers throughout Vail -she handles a weedeater like We just returned from a 12-day trip to the East Coast and we want to the Terminator! In the winter, Tish is a supervisor at the thank the officers who kept such a watchful eye on our house while parking structures. She tuns the day crew, and has many we were gone. This must be a nuisance, particularly during the busier times, but it is a wonderful service to the community. challenges as the structures fill. Tish started her career with the Town as a flower girl and a booth attendant. She Please pass along our thanks and appreciation to those who deserve learned the ropes and moved up the ladder to her current ;t, and thank xou for all you do. supervisory position. She has a little boy, Jared, and will Sincerely, begetting married in May,1994. This is Tish's last winter season with the Town, (which is why we decided to Alison Hoversten spotlight her!) since she will be moving to Loveland to be with her new husband, Matt, who is a state patrolman. Some dates to remember... The folks at the TOV will miss her crazy antics, and the 12/21 Winter Solstice (shortest day of the year) also Humbug Day knowledge she will be taking with her. Thanks, Tish. The 12/26 National Whiner's Day Town will not be the same without you! 12/31 Make Up Your Mind Day k~ : T~ L4 The Val1 Ttall's Rea! Estate Sectlon • Week of December 3 to 9, 1993 td' • Late h~ st site plan for the 16-unit pn,~ • townhome development by developer Stewart Brown,ln ~Ft'_61 / ' i Lionsridge. ~,o 1 to z ' r ` G i~r~rlFlEy• tit` - 1 - 9~G#~ • ,F w ® IDYdo M ~ ~ •,Y'~Y ,~,r .gym ~ ~ ' ~'W„ _ .rte- y, D ~p B ~ V ~ rv pa ~ V~~ f.~ According to Andy Knudtsen, town planner for Vail, Brown's plot was "recognized as wort: r ~ 1 / 1 1 1 ing within the bounds of the ~ court order" per Ordinance 13, • Section I, Letter G, Series 1981. 1 1 / 1 ' 1 d. 1 1 ~ To date, the Brown Project • has received final approval from both the Vail Design By CONNIE STEIERT Eagle County to build 40 unite New zoning requirements and thus ensued three years of Review Board and the Vail The Stew Brown project hoe there and has now reduced it to would have required no more legal process. Town Council. almost as long a history as Vnil only 16 unite on just one acre of than five units be built on a Brown introduced extensive The approval does not sit itself. As old as some of Veil's the property. Questions still property the size of the Brown evidence to show his property. well with some of the current oldest housing projects, what hover around it concerning its parcel. Whether or not the new 'was exempt and had been residents in the Lionsridge makes the Stew Brown project suitability for the area, even zoning requirements applied to treated as such by Eagle I,~p area however. stand out among the others ie after an involved legal battle, the Brown project had various County for a:; least two years Eric Beringause owns n du- that it's Heuer been built! In 1972, the property was interpretations, and took sev- subsequent to the implements- Alex on Caeolar Dove at its tar Tucked in between the more part of Eagle County and was era] years in court to sort out. lion of the Zoning Resolution. western edge. His property will spacious single-family duplexes not incorporated into the Town In March of 1976, Brown In a 1980 court finding, be in closest proximity to the of Casolnr Drive in Vail and the of Vail. met with planners from Eagle Browne project was declared proposed Brown Project. In more numerous townhomea of Lot G-4 was originally classi- County to present a revised "governed by the provisions of fact, his party deck will pro- Eiger Chalets and Briar Patch, fled by the Engle County sub- plan of only 20 to 30 unite on the subdivision regulation un- trade within only a few feet of is a 1.78 acre plot that may division regulations as a tom- Lot G-4. Brown was advised at der which it received approval" the project's retaining wall: soon house 16 townhomea, yet martial lot, under which con- that time that although his plan and not by the Zoning Beringause is concerned has been on the drawing board dos, multiple-family residences, about several issues on the in various forms for more than apartments, restaurants, coo- Brown Project. Density in such 21 years. leis, hotels, lodges, professional a small site is one of his fore- The "Stew Brown Project" is ofTices, shops, medical clinics, The approval does not sit well with some of moat concerns. known to the Town of Vnil as and service shops were all al- the Cllrrent PL'SldentS ll1 the Beringause contends that the Lot G-4 of Lionsridge 2nd towable uses. Lionsridge Loop area, however. Proposed structures are too tall filing. And it has a long and On Sept. 5, 1972, Lot G-4 and the scale too large for such legally intricate history with received final platt approval for a small "triangle of land. The both the town and Eagle the 40 unite requested by rest (of Brown's property) is County. Brown. This was, however, be- juatcliffa" Since its inception in 1972 fore Engle County had adopted ~ As one of the last available the Stew Brown project has any zoning requirements. It Mould generally be exempt Resolution, therefore legally lots in that area, Beringause been plagued by persistent con- wasn't until Sept. 16, 1974 that from the provisions of the guaranteeing its exemption would like to see the project fit fusion, concern, and a certain the Eagle County Commie- zoning resolution, due to a from then current county better into the rest of the neigh- amount of misrepresentation. eionere adopted the Eagle grandfather clause, he would zoning regulations. borhood. Current owner, Stewart County zoning resolution, be required to comply with the To further complicate In a letter to Knudteen in Au- Brown of Denvor, hna owned which set current standards for Parking and set-back require- Brown's approval process, the goat before final approval was the property since Decomber subsequent building in the moots of the resolution. lot that Brown's project was to given the plan, Beringause con- 1972. FIe originally petitioned county. According to a county court be developed on was annexed tended that "this project's finding, Civil Action No. 3459, into the Town of Vail in March tightly compacted, four-story despite "an abundance rf evi- 1981. Now Brown had to go condominiums do not fit in with dance established that the max- through a similar process of the adjacent neighborhood on Z'11e 21- chronolo ~ h>St0 imam allowable density of de- approval with Vail. the southaide of Sandstone velopment for Lot G-4 under After receiving preliminary Drive," referring to the single the Eagle County Zoning Reao- plan approval from the Vail' family homes and duplexes, in- of the Stew Brown Project lotion was only five units," Design Review Board, the eluding his own Casolar area. 1) September 1972, Brown receives final plat, Brown was only advised of plans were appealed, but were Brown points out that his possible slope restrictions. eventually approved. approval from Eagle County for 40 commercial units. plane had been approved for 30 Since nearly half oC hie prop- After Veil's own lengthy units and that the records have 2) December 1972, Brown purchases 1.78 acres, arty had a elope of 30 percent or study they concluded, along been public knowledge since Lot G-4, on Lionsridge 2nd filing. greater gradation, there was a with the county, that legally the before the Casolar development 3) On S [ember 16, 1974, Eagle County Commis- question of the safety of build- Brown development was in- was built. He feels that the sinners adopt the Eagle County zoning resolution. ing on that slope. Later the deed exempt from town zoning Casolar owners should have 4) In March 1976, Brown meets with county planners . ccurt found the slope gradation regulations as well as county been aware of hie project and to present a rcv'iscd plan for 20 to 30 units onlot G-4. to be of no significant problem regulations, due to the grandfa- its proposed density before Brown is informed his plot is acemptcd from new after soil tests were performed ther clause and the 1980 court purchasing their homes. d and engineering studies corn- ruling. Brown also refers to the zoning regulations due to the gran father clause. plated. Resolution No. 5 was passed townhouse projects currently 5) August 1977, when Brown tries to develop plot, his Brown was given to under- to lower the density on the surrounding his planned pro- oontractor is told it does not comply with current stand, at the 1976 meeting, that parcel from 40 units to 30, and jeer, such as the Eiger Chalets zoning regulations. because of grandfather clauses was, according to Brown a and the Briar Patch, as very 6) September 1977, Brown asked for a declaration his property was exempt from voluntary agreement between similar to his own project. from the county regarding the exemption of his p1att. the current zoning restrictions, himself and Vail. The Simba development 7) In 1980, the District Court rules that Lot G-4 is Yet when he tried to develop The Vail market had drasti- "below ma is now going into its ocempt from zoning r^~ulations, per the grandfather the property in August 1977, he tally changed in the interven- third or fourth phase and clause. was told by Engle County that ing years since 1972 and, in nearly 100 units," Brown adds. 8) In March 1981, the Town of Vail annexes roe his plan did not qualify because part to comply with Vail Design Knudtsen, too, says them is a P P rtY it did not comply with the Eagle Review Board recommends- "variety of development in the in Lionsridge 2nd filing, including Lot G-4. County zoning resolution. lions and also as a response to a Lionsridge Loop area." He 9} In May of 1993, Brown presented new plans with Brown appealed in Septem- slower real estate market, mentions not only Eiger Chalets reduced density from 30 to 16 units. bar 1977 to the Eagle County Brown presented a new plan and Briar Patch, but Lione- 10) 1993, final approval u given revised plan by the Commiaionere for a ruling on for approval in May of 1993 mane, Homeatake, and Break- Town of Vail. whether or not his property with reduced density of the away West, as similar devel- would bebound by the zoning current 16 unit development, opmenta to Browne with the - resolution. The board declared although legally he was still same or higher density. sue.. . r._:. _ .s... _ an in-depth study was required, entitled to build 30. 7Lm m page 4 r. is , ~ er 3 to 9. 1993 l . i r s. ~ ? r3~ • u~ ~ The unbuildable slope with 30 peroent grade that covers approximately .78 acres of the Stew Brown Project. r® ~®~ec~ ~mPa9e= and Caeolar Drive Home Board meetings concerning the Knudtsen says, "moat of the Owner Association member, Brown project at the home surrounding properties are like says there was initial concern owners request. Homeatake," not those along over the Brown Project. IIampton mentions home Caeolar Drive. Hampton says he attended °wners were concerned mainly Greg Hampton, manager moat of the Vail Design Review over the possibility of pedes- trian traffic through the pri- _ vately owned and maintained Caeolar Drive. They could forsee care seeking to save themselves an extra one-and-a- half mile drive to the Brown project entrance, dropping res- ~ idents of the project off on Ca- solar Drive to cut through ~ ' Caeolat's r..rz.:,/ to their ownx ; Hampton ''maintains "he - (Brown) didnt have anything' ~ prior to~my'going.to the meet-' ' inge to prevent that (pedestrians ' . ,aceese)."•• SSnco then'the neigh-. - bore ~requested:~.Brown radd < boulders and~treea'on the eastl ' , ':end of_ the Brown `property in• ;addition,to s`,six;to,eight'foot retaining ~~wall "to iprevent, inapr_",.--ate trat5c. ?~`t k`.~.: ~-i ' Single-familyjhomeownere .;.'r~~ Todger, and Mary-Ellen Arider-' 6 - • son' have : theirs>own' concerns ' ~ : ~,overtheBroivn~'developmeitt.., ~ Their heme,`intersecte Loti GAL ~~on an ~easterri'point ~~~Todger~ . Andereoa says .he,,hae a ,very r'{ ~ . powertLl vlew",+that he~wlll~loeea if the Brown project goes ahead ,sae planned."~''~; ~~F. E''yi iw ~•The'possiblihty;of eventually '.,-x, _ x • I oeing„your,Y;view;~ Andereoni ,r~,};= • .;eaye,~Yie';:t;}somethings every ~;;s~ ' ; property owner must face."'~ It - j. rie the density end arr...,..fi8te-a';!-. ~ ~ . • :Hess of the development.that is; - J• ~~Andereon a main concern:' a ' ~`F'„ ~ Anderson feels~the lot is beet k,, ~ s eirited for,'s'siiigle family home;t . ~ ' u ~ q.or preferably,;open spirace port =;M1 ' ' ?4t s~clrti~fi.«s~k'+~~3ar~~;~q ~ :;,r~S.- , ~ - . ~r 3 to 9, 1993 ' ° f Flom page 4 "limited in the extent of our re- Brown, too, is concerned chased by Vail. view:' For instance, he men- about misrepresentation. He is Another local developer had lions, "there was no opportun- concerned that all the confusion ~ been interested in purchasing ity to discuss density or park- surrounding the zoning status the plot from Brown in order to ing, because of the court order." of his parcel is deterring sales. put up five cluster homes, ac- Despite their limitations, He says people "cannot con- ' cording to Anderson, but felt Knudtsen feels that the Vni] ceive that it is not zoned", but Brown's asking price was way Design Review Board "did a exempt- toohigh. very good job working with Although Brown has not Another concern Beringause Brown to improve the project engaged a contractor yet, or ap- had was landscaping. Hie un- using the criteria we had." plied for a building permit, hie deretanding of the proposed Some of the changes the plane for hie 16 unite currently landscaping wne that only a board did suggest and Brown are for four•bedroom, four-bath few, very small trees were has agreed to are the additional townhomes with between 2700 going to be planted and that all landscaping, upgrades from and 3,000 square feet space. the present aspen on the site asphalt to concrete paving for He also mentions the town- would beremoved. aesthetic reasons (as required in homes would have various Knudtsen said this is not the Vail), an upgrade from timber amenities "not found in most case. The Vail Design Review to boulder retaining walla, and townhomea," such as study ar- board required that ell existing internal automobile access to eas, and equipment and mud trees be kept, and a total of 168 the 16 units (instead of street rooms. trees be added to the existing access and street-facing Brown feels that he has more landscaping plans, including 94 garages). then complied with alt of the aspen, b7 spruce, and 17 moun- Knudtten said the town sent Town of Veil's recommends- tainash. Knudtsen insists this is out notification to all Lot G-4 lions and that there is "a poten- "heads and shoulders above the neighbors regarding the design fiat for selling there (Lot G-4)." amount (of trees) normally re- review meetings, but had little Brown says hie goal as a de- quired," for landscaping. public input. veloper is to "provide the same Knudtsen admits the Vail He says the goal is to "get the type of luxurious condos that Design Review Board was community involved." are now aeliing in the market:' r.~•: xc:~~,,~;~, 'IfIEIIIS TBl}d~~' ~IE~RiIID 1[:IIDg7['E®R1 ~ , - - - ~ December 3, 1993 Sits duly deadline f®r all c®ntr~but®r°s t® vall~-ride off®~°t t® ~®m~ up with agr°eernent IBy.DoHun C~1h®aurn The marketing board will also ask Although the Beaver Creek board Specifically, the resort company Times Midweek Editor the contributing entities for athree-year told the marketing board that it would wants a recomposition of the marketing commitment so that it doesn't have to likely not participate in the effort, it board to create a more representative Officials representing the Vail Valley go through an annual battle for changed its mind and offered $100,000 board. Beaver Creek also wanted some Marketing Board yesterday voted to funding. if the marketing board would agree to sort of tracking mechanism in place to recommend approval of Beaver Creek's Last year the marketing board several changes . track whether the effort is working. offer to contribute $100,000 to the operated on a $685,000 budget. On valley-wide summer marketing effort. that Vail paid $160,000, Avon $90,000, . The Vail Town Council, which in Vail businesses $349,000, Vail effect controls marketing board. Associates $50,000 and Arrowhead and ~ - decisions, will hear the plan Tuesday. Cordillera make up the remainder of the The marketing board was somewhat budget.. - reluctant to accept Beaver Creek's offer Vail officials complained that their because it was .$80,000 shy of what town has been carrying the ball since Mazketing Board members thought was 1989 when the marketing board first , -fair for the resort, but decided to go formed under a Town of Vail ordinance ' ahead with it anyway so there would be and that cannot continue to do that. ~ . .money for the 1994 summer marketing. Although Avon recently voted to effort. ~ discontinue its $90,000 support of the The marketing moard did create a summer marketing effort, saying it 'July 1 deadline for all contributors to wasn't getting its bang for the buck, will ` the valley-wide effort to come up with likely revisit the issue Dec. 14. There an agreement as to each entity's fair are several members of the council who - share. The marketing board warned the have said they might change their vote Beaver Creek Resort Company, which is if Beaver Creek participated. A member separate from Vail Associates, Inc., that of the Avon Town Council yesterday . although it will likely accept the warned the marketing board that if $100,000 offer, the fair-shaze meetings Avon does vote in favor of a . may determine that the fair share for contribution, it may be less that the • the resort company could be much $90,000 figure. more, possibly up to $400,000. ~ If all entities participate the budget • The new fair shaze figures would go for the summer of 1994 would be some into effect for summer1995.:.~•: - $785,000.: a ~ P r x C ~IIHA~ Z(C: l.~t.Lu-u!L ~I From Page 1 - o j ~ ~ fair-share participation from Vail, Creek Resort Association and the and VA authorize their full r...ywed Avon, Vail Associates Inc. and Vail Valley Tourism and Convention contributions and that Avon recon- Beaver Creek Resort Co. has stalled Bureau), a board review and restate- cider its contribution. ~ Vail's authorization of its contribu- ment of its mission and goals, a com- However, the VVMB may decide ' tion for 1994. mitment to accurate ,tracking and to decrease its total budget to reflect = ~ The four-year-old VVMB gener- accountability procedures with regu- possible decreased contributions ales its $684,000 budget from contri- lac reporting. from both Beaver Creek and Vail and ~ bu[ions that include a $349,000 Vail The VVMB originally asked for Avon's pull-out altogether. ' business license fee, $160,500 from $180,000 from Beaver Creek Resort With regard to the other "strings ' the Town of Vail, $90,000.from - Co. -According to Kunkel, the offer "attached" to Beaver Creek's propos- j~ j Avon, $50:000 from: VA,` and=::=~of$100,000was"what they (Beaver,. al, Strauch.said he wants to ensure IIIJJJ"` U _ $35,000 of miscellaneous private Creek) could afford in their budget." fair -rather than equal - represen- f ~ / ¢ y, ~ - contributions,.including Arrowhead . , -VVMB member and Vail coun- tationofbothoftherecognizedreser- ba~I lO ~e~gl 1 - ~ Vatl• Gilman Jan Strauch expressed con- vations and booking agencies andl ; The Avon. Town Council voted ..cern that $L00,000 was not afair- .marketing board membership. ~ cash contribution ~ last week not to contribute$9o,o00to' share contribution.. Vail Mayor The VVMB will further recom-. the board, claiming its priorities }iad, Peggy Osterfoss agreed. - mend to the council that for advertis- changed and that- the , rriarketing "I think it is fair to say that' [he ing purposes, one-seventh of WMB By Kristin L. Kenney board's money should come from ttte~: town council has been a strong sup- .advertisements will specifically list oatiy start writer private sector.- - ' - " ~ porter of '.the regional marketing Beaver Creek. Contribution pereent- Bob Kunkel, vice~'presidenC of ~ effort," Osterfoss said. - ,age will determine the make-up. on The Vail Valley Marketing Board, "l marketing for VA, reviewed Beaver • But the mayor said the town felt ,the seven-member, all-volunteer., which is primarily funded by the Vail Creek'. s.prnposal=which_has VA's.- adjustments:eneed to be made Eo.`' board. Beaver Creek, VA and Avon Town Council, will recommend that , , . full support -with about 30 people. , reflect down-valley growth and fair-..would have one seat each, while Vail , the council accept Beaver Creek. ; ~ who attended an -.eazly,morning .,.share participation. would have four seats. Resort Co.'s proposal to contribute VVMB session Thursday. Osterfoss came up with an 18 per- The board's battle for funding this $100,000 to the board's. L994 budget. In addition to its $100,000 contri- -cent - or $155,000 to $165,000 - year has also resulted in a call fora The resort company's proposal bution, Beaver Creek asked that the . contribution from Beaver Creek, 68 three-year commitment from con- offers $80,000 less than what Vail following issues also be addressed: a percent from Vail and 14 percent tributors. i and marketing officials requested and recomposition of the marketing from Avon, based on respective sales'; Tabled for future discussion is a also attaches conditions. However, ~ board, equal representation of both . tax revenues alone. proposal to change the board's logo board officials said their desire to the , recognized -reservations- and The VVMB will recommend to from Vail Valley Summer to remain a valleywide entity and to booking agencies (the VaiUBeaver the town council next week that Vail VaiUBeaver Creek Summer. I expedite summer marketing efforts. • . prompted the recommendation. _ " . _ _ . _ _ ? - _ - - The marketing board hopes that a budget can be approved this month - and a "fair-share formula" for all con- tributotscan bedetermined by July 1, = 1994. "There is a certain amount of glee (among competing ski industry offi- cials) that we can't solve our own problems," said Tom Britz, chairman of the WMB. "I am really pleased to - ` have a proposal on the table." ~ " Since Colorado voters rejected a ' . statewide tourism tax Nov. 2, and on ~ Nov. 16 Vail voters shot down the ; proposed Vail Valley Performance and Conference Center, many local residents view the marketing board to be the last mechanism with which to • promote ayear-round economy in the :s~ Vail Valley. Among the board's duties are regional and national advertising campaigns and the production of an - 80.page summer guide. Currently, the Town of Vail funds. ' •75 percent of the $684,000 marketing's board budget. Determining what is': Please see WMB Page 4 ~ .;ij 1' k ~ e:~ 11 ~ 1fie 141171~aII - Reoember 3, 1993 . By 1 9PL~NE®dli, comprised of seven ranchers "Their agenda seems dedi- i i Gov. Roy Romer expressed and seven non-ranchers "has Gated to destroying the heritage We I1 a ~tCLCL~ a couple ~f SeSSLOYtS, hope this week that the federal made real progreas,° he said. and culture of the West While ,,y ,~,,yy y, g~ grazing fee issue could be our resort is designed in an ~ g~®CL expeY'l~'I2e~2t jlC~S beg'L6Y2 handled throughout the state Romer also sounded a remn- alpine theme for skiing, we are ~ by ranchers and environmen- ciliatory note about Secretary very aware that our guests and of Interior Bruce Babbitt, tpt ~tlYLY2LSOY2, but the r°e C> t®ng zvay talistsatlocallevels. the touring public also want a ,,y Romer said an experimental whose land-use policy propo- `Western experience.' They like f?'~~ fLYtLSj2eC~. ~ program had begun in Gunni- sals have rnme under fire from the open space and pastoral . son that involves area residents the agricultural sector. scenes of grazing liveatock.° in decisions made by Bureau of "The Secretary of Interior • Land Management otljcials. has commited to being in Colo- Further on in Daly's two- °If we are truly to balance rado one day a week; he is Page letter, he stated, °While the ecosystem and land man- commited to the process," Ro- our lease language ie apparent- . agement, it has to be done at mer said. ly different from grazing the local level," Romer said in a "I know he's doing this in leases, we are concerned that phone interview from the Capi- states other than Colorado, but the grazing lease language, if to] Tuesday. he has made a commitment to executed, could be interpreted "What we're trying to do is Colorado, and I think ranchers to spill over into recreation develop a system in which de- aPPreciate that." leases as well.° cisions within the BLM can be Vail Associates president Daly asked that ranching in- ° _,.~r'"'?'~. - made at the local level by ran- Andy Daly, in a letter address- teresta be heard in developing 1 chers and environmentalists. ed to Colorado's U.S. congres- fair Rangeland Reform. "They We've had a couple of sessions, sional representatives last are an important part of this i ~ and a good experiment has be- month, stated, "Mr. Babbitt thing we call 'Western her- gun in the Gunnison, but we're seems to be responding pri- itage.' It is ditTicult, if not im- • along way from finished." marily to the hard-core, urban- possible to put a dollar value on On the state level, a panel funded en~~irormental groups. culture.° tia ~ Vail Alpine w ~.it ~a du- ~ Qe6 lJ.~ ~f g Garden Foundation . ~ o December 2, 1993 _ ' Mayor Peggy Osterfoss~ Town of Vail ' 75 South Frontage Road . Vail, CO 81657 . Dear Peggye Congratulations.on some wonderful new Council members! We are also pleased to know that you will continue to be Vailos Mayor. ' Unfortunately you no longer have Bob Buckley, who was your representative to the Vail Alpine Garden Foundation. I hope that the Council will continue to have a liaison to our Board• ' The development of the Betty Ford Alpine Gardens is important to the Town, and""we would like to be able to continue this relationship. Please call me if you would like to discuss this further• Sincerely, Helen S • Fr.itch President of the Board HSFodyb "Vail will he as well k~zown in thesiinanierforitc flowers a~ i.t is in tie u~inter.for its~skiing." 183 GORE CREEK DRIVE • VAI L, CO.LO RADO 81657 • 303.476.0103 " Ga vameaon - a. p - WORK SESSION F0LL01N-UP December 3, 1993 Page 1 of 2 LTOP00 Qt9EST~ONS EOULOW-t~P SOL~DT90MS 1991 11!19 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES TOM M,/JIM C.: What can be done to make these uniform Problem will be resolved by 1/1/94. When new planner is hired and work and locations less prolific? assignments are given in CDD, priority will be reassessed. ' 1992 11110 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS Next meeting to be announced. 1993 09/30 PAY-IN-LIEU PARKING TOM M.1KRISTAN: Because this is a zoning code change, Scheduled for discussion at 12/14/93 Work Session. PEC will first review the proposed increaselspace. 10119 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF COUNCILISTAFF: Follow-up and respond to petitions Appraisal underway. TRAPPER'S RUN PARCEL presented at 10119/93, TC Regular Evening meeting. 10119 VRD CONTRACT LARRY G.ITOM M.ISTEVE T.: Council direction received If VRD agrees to Council terms and conditions, Larry Grafel is authorized ,11116193. to sign contract 1217193. 10/19 FOREST ROAD STREET TOM M.: Urge Joe Macy to work with Bruce Chapman and Dialogue continuing between effected parties, although no written CONTRACT W/VA homeowners so street use agreement can be signed prior agreement has been submitted at this time. Tom M. has spoken with to ski season opening 11/13193. both Rob Sperberg (VA) and Bruce Chapman to reconfirm working on a street maintenance agreement only. Other details are to be worked out between homeowners and VA. 10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND GREGILARRY G.: Immediately pursue purchase from VA PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres adjacent to the west. 10/26 WATER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT TOM M.: Prepare supporting ordinance. REVIEW REGULATIONS/NWCCOG 11/09 DRAFT RESOLUTION RE: TOM M.: Prepare resolution. Tom M. will request Roger Tilkemeier notify Council when this reappears RANGELAND DOCUMENT/BRUCE on Congressional level. BABBITT - _ 11/16 BUS STOP LIGHTING GREG/MIKE R.: Where are we on fighting all bus stops? (request: Lapin) An especially dangerous section exists at the East Vail Racquet Club stop. _ - December 3, 1993 Page 2 of 2 11116 ROAD OVERLAYSIUNDERLAYS GREG: Some high visibility road sections in town need a (request: Lapin) dose of TLC before Christmas, i.e., between 1st Bank and ° Sonnenalp Bridge Street, etc. 11/16 STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN KRISTAN/GREG: Is money available to commence some (request: Lapin) improvements called out in the Master Plan, especially along West Meadow Drive? 1 . ~ 13.43) MEMORANDUM TO: Pam Brandmeyer j FR: Tom Moorhead DA: December 1, 1993 RE: New In Lieu of School Land Dedication Fee . . Pam, the market value for the "in lieu fee" does apply to the Town of Vail. Section 17-17-020 of the Municipal Code provides for cash in lieu of land dedication. Our ordinance applies a formula which I imagine is consistent with the formula referred to in Jack Ingstad's memorandum (attached). It is my understanding that the Town of Vail was also using the $5,000/acre figure that was used throughout Eagle County. Our ordinance requires that the current market value of unimproved land should be set annually by the Town Council on an acre basis with recommendations from the School District. The same value per acre shall be used throughout the Town. It seems reasonable that the figure to be used would be the $50,000/acre figure which has been established by the County. I believe it would be in the Town's interest to have someone present at the discussion on December 7, 1993, at 10:00 A.M. who could then report to Council and assist in the setting of the value as required by our Code. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. U xc: Jim Curnutte C:\INLIEU.MEM ~u~~ ut •Lr-iut..~. LVUI`I11 rll-1(-r70 r 1'f•Ur7 r c7UJ7LCflLU!-' i]Ui74lryLli}liTf 1/ 1 . . ~ X ~ C4wtrei:2~ • v.o Y\~~bl~6e~ ~~Y 1 V Id~ n a ''e FAGI F. COUNTY BUILDING ~j t;, , • 55I RRUAUWAY : ~ OFRCE OF THE ~ • PA. ROX 850 ~ • FAc;IE, COLORADO $I b~ COIWTY MANAGF'.K FAX: (303) 328.72Uf (303) 328.8605 _ ~ r.: •'`~w' Kfr' ~~~•41•N qk` a n IlI~1'T~~ES~IE~ 1P111.3~IE5 D~~'g'IG: 1~1~11~Iih[H$~~ fl'~, l~3 IF+~4~Ic1~: 91~.~ l.~I~S~~, Il'~~%.Y~ ]ttEt.1~77~'Il~1~S ll~I~: ~li~ ILl[lEl~ S~Il~4)®Il. •l..~i~~ II~IlIl~Il~'~'~1®I~ ff~Il?Il~ fl~IlS~fl75S1®A~S ~tereste~fl pa~ttnes a>re ~eu~eted ~ a discussil~n ~ff ~e mew ~ lieu of sc9ec~ol land ~~a?,~ xis- IEalgle tCu~tr tCm~,issinaa~s. 7'l~e dlsc~sssa~ is scheduled fer cma~ea '1, 13 49:~ a.~n. ~ ~e Eagle C~~tp Itocnata, 5 Il3r~adway, IEagle. T'he ~~em~ " n~ ad,~~ns¢eaIl the fees ~~ve>c 15, ~ u~tlect clnnnges ~ }het val>laes i>In ~ge~ tt~mugh®a~t JEargl~ ~un~. SIC an #leu fee is sa~lcelated by a ff~>:a~eala tit tta~Ies imt® acc®~t a>~rP~et value aid aa~nts deveIl®9_ ~i®~ ~ ~~in?~, ~a>r~et balsas ®f alll lard iuu ogle ~n»tyr was set at $5, am arse. iUsing (the f~a~~la, the t,~~aa~uns ~ Ilneu ®f calculated ~ a crost ~ developers of X71 a unig. . The mew a>~ feu ~f f~ a~ lend valu~al at amm acre am~~e~ses ~ appa~~ceately ~7Il~ ai int. due ~®ni~issi®is ~e ff®ll~wimg anar~t values I~do+ve~be~r Il.~: Il~ecia~ct Il~ ~a[+6ig8 ~f..~1~, I~YfC~ll19~Ct Q~~ ~a1l~~, ~ ~ $ 8®,LY'l7V ~~nturn~, II~~~ctt $5~, (Edwsrds~, ~~isact ~-$IlO, ~~gYe), Paeci>~ 6- ~1~,400 Qffi~, ]1~cina:tt eta, (Brasalt~, e~a,;~.aact $10,~ ~~l ~~eIl~, 1$recinct ~Sweeew'ater~, ~ecci~tct 10- ~7,~~ (Il$urns~, c~ct 1 I- X7,50@ Q~o.QdlA~cCop~, I~~~CADI~ft 1(ZZ- ,~p.Y®,~~.(~~ ~a111~~, ~r6CffiCt AT S 10,E (~ai1~, iDtCG11LC~ ~.4~ SS®, ijP+SS~ ~~al}, ~1CeCEFAGt ~~~®BA~, Il1HC$ (l~l![D9A~I, GffiCt ~7o5R~ Q1s. IF.atgle)D k'rr~mct Y7- $~a, (~~Ile ~alel?e Imeeelrs, el~tcd ~ff~caals al~d m~eg ~tegested des have nv~aested aen ®p~ 'ty >~view ¢he data. f~i< bushing >~arket valanes. ~ be ~C®naraiss~ners reviewed delta fu~ffi the asses9s ®~nce pegarding recEn9 salttes iu each the precincts ad~ead vagul~ acc~diugly_ 'Il'k A~~' ~~II,[j~S Y ~l~ SU~]E~ 1T~ ~~D~1GE fl~®Q~l.~®NIlN~ 7' ~IS~USSI~h~I_ Il~~r fcr ~frurmaati®n, plc~se cam ~c apt ~e ~~~aaa~i®an ~f~iise at ~2~860~.