The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-01-04 Support Documentation Town Council Work Session VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1994 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. Discussion Re: Vail Valley Marketing Board Funding. 2. Appointment of Alternate Appointee to NWCCOG & QQ. 3. Information Update. 4. Council Reports. 5. Other. 6. Executive Session: Legal Matters and Land Negotiations. 7. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: • • • • • • • THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/11194, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • C:WGENDA.WS VAIL TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1994 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 2:00 P.M. 1. Discussion Re: Vail Valley Marketing Board funding. Peggy Osterfoss Action Requested of Council: Review and discuss the response from Tom Britz dated December 23, 1993, regarding recommendations for the next course of action. 2:30 P.M. 2. Appointment of Alternate Appointee to NWCCOG & OO. Pam Brandmeyer 2:35 P.M. 3. Information Update. 4. Council Reports. 5. Other. J 6. Executive Session: Legal Matters and Negotiations. 7. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/11/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • C:WGENDA.WSE YHI 3039491922 P. 01 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,i ' • ~ , • Spy' ~ wr + y~~ I . ~ ~ ~ • ..MEMORANDUM. ' . ~ . • • ~ December 23, 1993 ~ ~ _ ~ • ' . _ ' TO: Pe®gy Ost+ertpss, Mayor ' ' .ac• Suzanne Silverthorne • Vall Town Council ' . . FR: Tom Brifz, Chairman • . . • Vail Valley Marketing Board . ~ - 1 RE: ~ RESPONSE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ON 1/AiL VALLkY.MgRKET1NG BOARD . . . 1 ~In response to the Councl's directive to come back to the Val Town Counpi with. ~ I • a recommendation•for the next'course of action, we have deliberated at length . ' ' and are responding to you in the form of three options. • . ' ~ ~ • ~ Each option has its own set of Pro.'s and Con's, which are generally summarized with•each option. We feik it best to approach the search for a solution in this ~ ' manner, so that the Councirwouid have a sense of the opportunttles cnd, . ~ • consequences of ony dec'sion might render. : , ' ; In a, related matter, the Val Valey Marketinb Board has disbanded, due to the ~ ' 'current set of unfortunate circumstances. it was fett_that with the end of Fisedi • Year 1493 and. no Orin funding in place' for 1994, that we hove no authority to ~ • continue our work or begin the 1994 process until the fun.'ding is in place and we • are directed t_o do so. Furfihermore, with a' Ukely resolution lrnminent (one of the • • .three options or a cornbi'natlon), our sense (s that there will be a reconstituted ~ ~ . Board with v different allocation bf'6oard represoritcrtion. Assuming this ocCUrs,• i • the newly constituted Board can begin its work immediately, but the reality is that the current Board cannot do anything until ifiese Issues are resolved. • Please call rrie wtth,apy questions. • • • . . r . • . , . ,r ` '93 12123 17t~2 M,:ld 383 4T6 6888 UAIL RESORT ASSO S. f92 ! , . :~~p~ . _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ • • vuL vi?LLSY. TSav Ho~a ~aao,~..~..~?mxo~s oPTSOx ~s dawn of vaik~movea forward on itis vwr, ' .Funding: Business Lioe]nge F'ee - $368, 004 . ~ Censral Ftuld - i~o, 300 -~----val.l Addociates ~ - 50, 000 • • .-a r-al.r~ . Total $560, 500 • Administration:.:~_~~~BOard appointed solely by Vail ' ~ Totem! COUriCil • . • • ' ~ • . - ~ ~tOS ~ ~ ~ ~ CONS . . ..---r...-~~..., r......---.------ .r~M~+Ar!!PP-r-Pr~~-~Ir~~INYaePPP~..-~~r ' ~ ! --Timing -Now -May lead ~v ienego~iation with --PoliticalXy correct ~ . V~1 - 8ueinegs License Paa~ -Create a bigq~r i'und for _ eantribution • .summer marketing than the ~VVTCB raferrals~includa Avon - proj~cted~rsduaad level ~ ~ sled ~aaver Creek , • -Bnd up ~it4~ bigger impact •for ~ -~quity~ in pVai•1 Valley~~ name i~ ~a3.1 beo~µse .a! tho boo ~c ~ 1®st. • ~ • ' ~ ~+L~hg-tarsi ~ zaay forOe aooperatioil ~ -PR yiria is a aoneo~q . on all iesuss -Destroys Valley-wide -Q.O.V. alr®ady ~houldera ~ ~ ooO~~ratian' • ~ .'~s8 c~ current effort, why -Politically' ir?barr~ct nati 1004 _-Vafi Will have to ~thQUldQr • - ~ gtitndirig ecumxaer marketing on • . ~ - fts own. ' ~ -aa~iG lOBe of continuity • ..,.n:.:..:::". - MI - - 3039 1 2 - •93 24/23 Ist42 'b` 303 476 6808 URIL RESORT g5S0 03 °r::i ~ Fs. a ~ c... , GPTIOIt Regroup wftboUt Avon ee "Vail/BBaVer Creek Marketing ' Bodrdnj Delete all x'+ei'erences to Avon: ' ' Th~ee~(3} y~Ax commitment and ether isauea fn T.4.V. memo still apply Fund~.ngs •~-~-~usiness License Fee - $3s0, 000 yell ~Aaso~~.ates - 50, 400 . 8advsr Creek Resort . company - 1,00, 000 - s-a--..--.-w TOta1 $SOO,000 Administration: Consider Retaining wail vollay~+ name,~eo as riot. to alienate other partnerht i.e. A>:rowheafl, Eagle ' County, etc; seven member Board: T.Q.V. - 4 . aCF~C - 2 VA - 1 ~cttggest appointing the 'best people~~t~va- residents. EROS cons a--~rwwwaaaaaa~~.ra-a aaawaasarww -~-rwati-----..w~.-wwr-----••---wir-- -Avon receives benefits -Continues ~zoncept n~ valley- ~regqardlass ~ Wide coop®rataon ' ~ -'Air sharo funding issue ~;Leavea door open !or Arrotib~ead, needs to ga back to T.o.V. ~r:::5~<~t:Cvrdillara,"°~BagTa'"county ex -Timing to go forward is °~lvon; to re~ofn or ~ppaaxtieipate ~ required; stay delay -W,iI1 contti~u~ mamebtum, synergy impplemontation . of Vail/Beaver Creek woxking -politically~inaorreatt re; together. cooperation betwoan Avon -No probieap keeping PR firm aid everybody sloe -Timier~ -Mid-January ~_s'"~. '93 12/23 13143 T, 303 476 680E VRIL RESORT A550 ~ flti o~rxo~r ~a Negoti,atione continu® betwesrl Vail. and Arlon; anther" T.ooV.. issues f1~ ai~ill app1X Fundings _~.~~}~i1lltlfs Lioens~e P'ee - $350, 000 Vail Associates - 90,000 BCRC - 1100,000 • Town bP Avan ~ SQ,000 • - ~otai ~ $550,000 i~,c9minietxation: Board seats - remai.rl as originally praposed iri T.o.V. Memo: Town at veil - 4 Beata . Beaver Crselc Kesort Co.~ 1 seat • Vafl Aaslaeiatas, ~nc.~ r 1 seat Town oP Avon - 1 seat • .._..r,..~ PROS CANS --«rr----r-ro~rw--------~sr..-. ...o------ro~.sw-..-woo--r~r~a---rrr~~ - -Avori ramainE~~ ~a~ "plAyer": -Timing ~ _ Politiadlly correct . , . -Avon fs sti].1 a ~ce3.uctant „Y ,~:,z;r: _ player -cantinue~ ~ ~aenv~pt o~~ ~Va~.ley- . -Timing aau~.d b0 1$te Jgtluary Wide .c~p~gation. ~ ~ ~ ®r February _ - : ~LeavE~s.' eloar ~apen For . Arxewhaad ~ - ~ . ~ Co~diilera Eagle Counby or ~ ~i . `,~;`~ava>~. ~a ; roar, -'ox~.: ioipatr =will cont~aau® women um, synergy of ~ Vail.%13eav~r• Cire~k working - togatheP • -~t~ probi~a l~esPfng pit Firm - ~ rr-v-• RECEIVED ~~C Z 71993 g STA1 ~ OF COLORADO (J COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ~~;°F cO~9 Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. Laboratory Building ~ Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 4210 E. 11th Avenue ~ is~s " Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 (303) 691-4700 Roy Romer Governor MEMORANDUM Patrioa n. Nolan, MD, MPH Executive Director T0: Interested Parties pa~~ FROM: Dick Parachini, Eagle Mine Project Manager DATE: December 16, 1993 SUBJECT: Eagle Mine Preliminary Air Monitoring Results -November 1993 (EAG 7.1.6.3) The attached letter and table is an update regarding the Eagle Mine air monitoring program during November 1993. The airborne particulate data collected by the Paramount air monitors shown in the tables are preliminary in nature. This means that the Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) values may be revised after auditing and validation by the air monitoring contractor and the State. The information is useful in assessing emissions during this time period, as well as trends in potential human exposure. The air monitoring stations on top of the Minturn Middle School and at the North Cross Creek station have continued to operate on a 1-in-3 day schedule during the 1993 construction season. The concentrations for TSP, Pb (Lead), As (Arsenic), and Cd (Cadmium) were below the air emissions permit levels during the month of November. Site activities in November continue to be associated with collection and transfer of contaminated water to the lined storage pond. The water treatment plant continues to treat and discharge it to the Eagle River. Sludge generated from the treatrnent plant continues to be deposited in the historic pond area. Construction activities at the Consolidated Tailings Pile include excavation and screening of clean soil material and placement and compaction as the cap layers. Approximately 9 additional acres of cap section have been placed and submitted to the State for approval. The sludge disposal cell and liner have also been constructed and submitted to the State for approval. Construction of the temporary water impoundments on top of the Consolidated Tailings Pile is continuing. The surface runoff. drainage chute off the northwest side of the pile has been submitted to the State for approval. Reshaping activities have begun in the historic pond area and may continue into the winter months. Air monitoring by Paramount will continue as long as earthmoving activities continue at the site. Construction also continues on the sludge dewatering system next to the water treatment plant building. For additional information, please contact Dick Parachini (692-3396), Doug Ilcenberry (827- 5928), or Marion Galant (692-3304). DP/dp Attachments - I~'' ~w•A r 1 ~ . "r: I EES Eagle Engineering Services, Inc. December 9, 1993 Mr. R.W. Parachini • - ~ AEG j ~ 1993 Colorado Department of Health 4300 Cherry Creek Drive So. Denver, CO 80222-1530 ~ Dear Dick: Enclosed are three (3} copies of the November 1993 Airborne Particulate Concentrations Report for the Eagle Mine site. We would emphasize the provisional nature of the data and the fact that revisions may be made after auditing and validation. Sincerely, EAGLE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. illa .Matthews Project Engineer LRM/ccp Enclosure cc: Howard Roitman, Remedial Programs, CDH Douglas Ikenberry, CDH Robert Neukirchner, EES G. Greg Lord, EES Chris Crouse, D&M 710 Kipling St. Suite 305 • Lakewood, CO 80215.1303) 235-0733 • (303) 235-0915 FAX t~ AIR90RNE PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS EAGLE MINE SITE NOVEMBER 1993 (N9im') SCHOOL SITE NORTH SITE Date p~~ p~~ Sampled TSP" Pb''~ . AS"a" Cd~~~ "v'l0 TSP` Pb"! AS~~• Cd~~• . ~.,lo 1 1 /03/93 19.4 < 0.0034 0.0084 < 0.0034 8.0 21.6 0.0046 0.0048 < 0.0035 10.2 1 1 /06/93 3.6 < 0.0032 < 0.0019 < 0.0035 < 2.0 8.8 < 0.0030 < 0.0017 < 0.0034 S.2 11 /09/93 9.8 0.0082 0.0028 < 0.0036 3.4 14.8 < 0.0029 < 0.0017 < 0.0034 9.7 1 1112193 11.1 < 0.0041 0.0037 < 0.0038 5.3 7.2 0.0037 < 0.0018 < 0.0035 ID 1 1 /15/93 7,6 < 0.0034 < 0.0020 < 0.0039 3.7 15.7 < 0.0038 < 0.0019 < 0.0040 10 11 /18/93 i 2.3 < 0.0043 0,4023 < 0.0052 4.1 14.8 < 0.0035 0.0020 < 0.0041 ID 1 1 /21/93 5.9 < 0.0041 < 0.0020 < 0.0035 2.7 10,7 < 0.0035 < 0.0017 < 0.0033 ID 11 /24!93 5.7 < 0.0035 < 0.0019 0.0037 2.7 7.7 < 0.0032 < 0.001 B ~ < 0.0036 4.1 11 /27/93 4.0 < 0.0036 < 0.0020 < 0.0035 < 2,0 7.6 < 0.0032 < 0.0018 < 0.0038 4.9 11 /30/93 8.3 < 0.0035 < 0.0021 < 0.0036 4.4 16.6 < 0.0032 0.0023 < 0,0037 10.4 IO ~ Invdid date • Permit Ilrnitation is 1t>0lrglm° ° ` Permit limitation is 1.5 ~r0lm' " ` Permit trt9per level is 0.010 po/m' THESE DATA ARE PROVISIONAL AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER VALIDATION _ ~ ~ RECEIV~~ Z 7 199$ 1~ : ~ ~ ~ "Voice of the Western Slope, since 1953" . A coalition of counties, communities, businesses & individuals December 20 , 1993 303 / 242-3264 * FAX 303 / 245-8300 P.O. Box 550 Town of Vail Grand Junction, Colorado 81502-0550 75 S. Frontage Rd W Vail, CO 81657 Dear Friends: I am writing to let you know that Eagle county is one of several whose CLUB 20 Board members' terms expire this year. As .you may know, CLUB 20 Board members are elected to two-year terms, so half of the counties are elected each year. Under our by-laws, Directors are elected by the membership in Eagle County, so we'll come and host a meeting of all CLUB 20 members there. Each member is entitled to an equal vote in this process, and you will elect who you want to sit on our Board for the next 2 years. This caucus will be held Wednesday morning, January 5, at 9:30 am, in the 2nd floor classroom at Vail-Beaver Creek Jet Center (Eagle County Airport). Please join us for a cup of coffee and a brief and informal meeting. Your current board member is Tom Harned and your alternate is Ken Norman (one alternate seat is vacant). These Board positions are considered extremely important for two reasons. First, in representing the Western Slope, we do not take positions on issues without a vote of this Board, which includes representatives of every community. So this is the group which determines Western Slope policy on a wide range of issues (natural resources, public lands, transportation, water, economic development, tourism, recreation, etc.) Second, many of our counties are very diverse, geographically and politically, and the board member must represent all the interests in that county. It is vital that all Western Slope communities and interests feel adequately represented on this Board. When we go to Washington D.C., or Denver, to speak for Western Colorado, we need to know that we're representing everyone. So this caucus is important, and we hope you'll plan to attend. We'll also update you on all our activities, and issues of common interest. Hope to see you there. ince , Gr E. Walcher sident x ~ : C~,t~r,~,e, GORSUCH, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL,WALKER AND GROVER CHARLES E.RHYNE WILLIAM A.kEE/E MAUREEN NERR JURAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN J.MULLINS ELLEN E. STEWART MAURY L. CUJE k ENNETN O. CNRISTIANSSEN GERALD E. DANL SUITE I IOO STEPHEN A. wEINSTEIN PAUL ~ kENN EBECk 1401 SEVENTEENTH STREET ROBERT J.kAPELNE JOSEPH B.wILSON PHILIP E. RIEDESEL CURTIS k. MATUNA SPECIAL COUNSEL DENVER,COLORADO 80202-9624 JOMNJ.kING,JR. PAULI.OM WM. C.MeGEHEE DAVID M. POWELL STEPHEN M, BRAINERD STEVEN R. NUTCNIN9 MAILING ADDRESS JAMES A.JABLONSkI DAVID B.SESERMAN DUANE WOODARD P. O. BOX 17180 ROGER W. NOONAN kRISTINA B.NAN850N BRUCE A. kOLBEZEN DUDLEY P. BPILLER,JR. kEVIN M, BAIRD ALLEN 9PARNMAN DENVER, COLORADO 8 0217-018 0 RANDY D. NNk DAVID B. ELLIS TELEPHONE (303) 299-8900 S, LEE TERRY,JR. JOLENE R. VER STEEG FAX (3031 29 8 - 0215 TIMOTHY J. PARSONS LAURA J. NAGLE CONNIE B. NTDE HEIDI J. kE51NGER OF COUNSEL G. DONONUE kANE CYNTHIA R, SMITH FREDERk: L. kIRG15 ARUN DAS ADRIENNE H, BENAVIDET LEONARD M, CAMPBELL COLORADO SPRINGS OFFICE PAULA M. CONNELLY MONIU E. BRION SUITE 1400 MARIA J. FLORA ANDREW D. CONEN BO S. CASCADE AVE. PETER R. NADEL DEBORAH J. BENNETT , COLORADO SPRINGS,COLORADO 8 0 90 3-1611 RITA O. SAVADE DEAN C. NEI2ER TELEPHONE (718)633-0061 MALCOLM M. MVRRAT DAVID C. CON LET IN COLORADO $PRIN09 DENVER LINE (3 031 620-8020 MARk C. NANSEN BETH M, kLEIN BRUCE A, kOLBEZEN FA%11191 6 3 8-8 461 WILLIAM R. BAESMAN NINA M. IUZAZIAN DAVID C. CONLEY December 21, 1Q'93 Dear Clients and Friends of the Firm: On behalf of the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry, the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the Hispanic Bar Association, and the law firm of Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker and Grover, I am pleased to announce that the next meeting in our continuing Colorado Business Breakfast series will take place on Wednesday, January 5, 1994. As you may recall, the .breakfast provides an opportunity for the presentation and exchange of ideas, including controversial and innovative ones, which are important to doing business in Colorado, with an emphasis on finding pragmatic ways to assist small business owners and operators, especially minority~wned businesses. The intent is to select leaders from the business, legislative and educational communities who will speak about issues that affect us all and who will then listen to the views of the other participants. Our speakers will be Jeffery McMoms, Chairman of CACI, co-owner of the Colorado Rockies, and Senior Vice President of NW Transport Services; George Dibble, President and CEO of CACI; and Michael McArdle, Director of Governmental Affairs of CACI. The topic will be the 1994 Colorado legislative agenda. Significant issues include workers compensation, health care reform, and economic development. This forum will provide business persons -especially those with small and medium-sized businesses - a look at legislation being considered. The business community has drafted legislation for a proactive economic development package for which CACI is sacking input from businesses before a final version is drafted. This session promises to be one of the most active on record in the area of health care reform. Once again, the business community has taken the lead with the formation of the Employers Coalition for Healthcare Reform, plans for which will be discussed in detail. Additionally, workers compensation bills which have been proposed will be discussed. ` We hope you will join us at 7:30 a.m. on Wednesday, January 5, 1994, at the Denver Petroleum Club located at 555 17th Street on the 37th floor of the Anaconda Tower. There is no charge for attendance or for the light breakfast which will 'be provided, but seating is limited, so please make your reservation by calling 303-299-8969. If you require additional information, please call Cecilia White at 303-299-8900, extension 601. Yours sincerely, GORSUCH, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL, WALKER AND GROVER S. Lee Terry, Jr. i1? TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 MEDIA ADVISORY FAX 303-479-2157 December 22, 1993 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn TOV Community Relations 479-2115 VAIL TOWN COUNCIL HIGHLIGHTS FROM DEC. 21 .Work Session Briefs --Eagle .County Recreation Authority At the request of the Eagle County Recreation Authority, the Town Council voted 5 to 2 to remove a contingency:in a letter of agreement between the authority and the school district. The contingency was to assure the"re would be a residential component in theBerry Creek Fifth filing sketch plan. The contingency was removed as part. of a "good faith effort" to move the project forward. The sketch plan currently includes a new school on the property, recreational and open space, plus 198 units on 16 acres:. Merv Lapin and Tom Steinberg voted against the motion, noting the county could approve construction of a school, but not residential units. If a school is approved on the. site, town council members will insist the project include residential units. The Town of Vail has a 60 percent ownership of the project. --Signs The Town Council directed staff to recommend several options regarding enforcement of termination and amortization of nonconforming signs pursuant to the sign code ordinance. --Parking Pay-in-lieu Program The. Town Council directed staff to research the 1994 replacement cost for spaces in -tlie.pa~king structures. The town currently. charges $8,628 per space. It is estimated the. actual cost of each parking space is $12,000 to $15,000. Council members expressed an interest in adjusting the fee to a "realistic" amount. Staff also was asked to research if those monies can be earmarked for future capital projects in the parking fund. --Holiday Traffic Management Plan Police Chief Ken Hughey presented an update on the holiday traffic mitigation plan. For details of the plan, contact the Community Relations Office at 479-2115. (more) Town Council Update/Add 1 --Vail Valley Marketing Board The council indicated it would discuss Avon's funding proposal at its Jan. 4 work session. .Evening Meeting Briefs --The council set a public meeting on the evening of Jan. 4 to gather public reaction to the Lindholm land exchange proposal. For details, contact the Community Development Office at 479-2138. --An ordinance was approved establishing new procedures for exterior alterations or modifications of buildings in the commercial cores. For details, contact the Community Development Office at 479-2138. The next Vail Town Council work session will be at 2 p.m. on Jan. 4, followed by an evening meeting at 7:30. ~1/ .h TOWN OF VAIL ~ 75 South Frontage Road Yail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 23, 1993 Contact: Tom Collins, 479-2346 E-911 EMERGENCY SYSTEM GOES ON LINE JANUARY 5 FOR UPPER VALLEY 'FOLLOWING TEST. FOR "926" CUSTOMERS (Vail)--The Vail Police Department, with help from U.S. West and PTI Communications, will activate its new enhanced 911 (E-911) system Wednesday, Jan. 5. But first, officials are asking all 926 prefix phone customers to test the system between now and Jan. 4. Residents and businesses within the test area are asked to dial 611 (not 911) between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. Sunday through Friday. The non- emergency test allows dispatchers to check the system's database, as time permits. Errors will be corrected by U.S. West. Unlike the current 911 system, enhanced 911 captures critical information during an emergency call, including name, address and phone number from which the call is made--even if a person hangs up. The system also identifies jurisdiction for emergency services response. The Vail Police Department handles fire and police dispatch calls for Vail, as well as Minturn and Avon. (more) E-911 Ready/Add 1 Once on line, the system will serve 14,056 phone lines from Vail to Wolcott, including Avon, Minturn, Edwards and some parts of unincorporated Eagle County. Five other prefixes were tested in November: 476, 479, 827, 845 and 949. When the E-911 system is activated, callers won't notice anything different on their end of the line other than the dispatch center having immediate access to phone number and physical location information, said Tom Collins, communications manager for the Vail Police Department. "The system will produce a faster response time for all jurisdictions because we'll already have the basic information on where we need to go to answer a valid emergency," Collins said. E-911 also will be extended to Gypsum, Eagle and other down valley customers in the coming months. The Colorado State Patrol in Eagle will begin testing its system in January, with activation planned for March 1994, Collins said. The E-911 system is funded through a 55-cent monthly tariff on local phone bills. For more information, contact Collins at the Vail Police Department, 479-2346. # # # X L ~ t-t~t/k,~,'~ ® RP~~IVEO,oEC z 9 1993 ~ invitatlonal golf tournament a`, n- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ~ Contact: Kathy Meyer 303 476-6330 27 December 1993 1994 DATES SET FOR,THE JERRY FORD INVITATIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT (NAIL, CO) - Next year's dates have been set, and calendars are being marked for August 14, 15, and 16, 1994. The beautiful Vail Valley will once again play host to sunny skies, crystal clear Rocky Mountain air, countless rounds of exciting golf action, and a special gathering of friends that is the Jerry Ford Invitational. Next year's 18th Annual JFI Tournament will once again precede the INTERNATIONAL in Castle Pines, and promises to be better than ever. The venues for Tournament play will remain the same as in past years with the 5th Annual Celebrity Shootout scheduled for play on Sunday, August 14, at 1:00 p.m. at Beaver Creek Golf Course. Tournament play will begin on Monday, August 15 and continue through Tuesday, August 16 at both Vail Golf Club and Country Club of the Rockies. In addition to all the fabulous golf action, sights are being set on the annual Ford and Friends Celebrity Concert, which will be held Monday evening, August 15, 1994 at the Gerald R. Ford Amphitheater. # # # # 953 South Frontage Road West, Suite 222, Vail, Colorado 81657 303/476-6330 FAX 303/476-5740 TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 28, 1993 Contact: Mike Rose, 479-2178 Transportation Manager TOWN OF VAIL PARKING REVENUES' REFLECT IMPACT OF FREE EVENING PARKING POLICY (Vail)--Although a Denver newspaper columnist this week calls it the "biggest ripoff in Colorado skiing," the man who supervises Vail's parking structures is telling a different story. The theme for Mike Rose this year isn't "biggest ripoff." It's biggest deficit. "We're offering more free parking this year than ever before, and our revenues are - . reflecting that," said Rose. In fact, if the pattern continues, the Vail Village and Lionshead parking structures will face a deficit of nearly $100,000 this season. Revenues from the structures are used to offset debt service and operational costs. This year's revenue loss stems from the town's new evening policy which offers three free hours of parking upon entry between 6 and 9 p.m. Throughout the remainder of the day, the town offers 90 minutes of free parking. In establishing the experimental evening policy--at the request of shopowners and restaurateurs--the town had hoped to recover the losses by increased sales tax revenues. (more) Parking Revenues/Add 1 Although it will take until mid-January to collect and review the latest sales tax figures, Rose isn't optimistic. "We tried to calculate the number of extra dinners that would need to be sold to make up the difference, and the number was something like an additional 100,000 transactions of $25 each between 6 and. 9. Or, another way of calculating it is an additional $2.5 million in sales .over 144 days of the season. I'm not sure it can be done," he said. From Nov. 25 to Dec. 26 this year, there were 56,577 transactions in the Village parking structure. That's a seven percent increase over the 52,462 entries for the same period last year. But revenues for the 32-day period were down 18 percent from 1992, with $146,572 collected this year compared to $178,805 in 1992. At the Lionshead structure, transactions were up 10.6 percent, with 33;176 entries compared to 29,981 a year ago. Revenues showed a slight increase, up 4.8 percent, with $89,684 from Nov. 25 to Dec. 26 this year, compared to $85,512 a year ago. - Transactions for both structures show a total increase of 8.8 percent over last year, and decreased revenues of 10.6% during the 32-day counting period. In addition to the revenue and transaction statistics, Rose is conducting periodic surveys in the parking structures to help determine the impacts of the evening parking policy on residents and guests. Rose will present his preliminary findings to the Town Council in January. "It ultimately will be up to the council to determine how to make up the' deficit," Rose said. "But it has to come from somewhere." # # # ' i rt u TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Vail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 28, 1993 Contact: Mike Rose, 479-2178 Transportation Manager PARK & RIDE. AT DOWD JUNCTION WILL CONTINUE THROUGH SUNDAY DESPfTE SLOW USE (Vail)--The Town of Vaii's free park and ride program at Dowd Junction will continue through Sunday (1-2) as planned despite limited participation by the public. As of Monday, only 27 vehicles had used the U.S. Forest Service lot since the experimental program began on Dec. 23. Participation has ranged from no cars on Dec. 23 to a high of five vehicles on Dec. 27. - Park and .ride was initiated as part of the town's holiday traffic strategy, a multi- faceted plan to reduce congestion by 500 cars per hour during peak times. Transportation Manager Mike Rose said the park and ride service is costing the town about $300 a day, or a total of $3,000. "We talked yesterday about the possibility of discontinuing the service, but we .made the decision to follow through on our commitment to the program," said Rose. Vail-bound buses will continue to make morning stops at the lot at 6:30, 7:30 and 8:30, with service returning to the park and ride lot by 3:45, 4:45, 5:45 and 6:45 p.m. (more) Park & Ride/Add 1 Rose said he isn't sure why more people aren't using the lot. "Maybe it takes some getting used to, or maybe we'd be more successful if we could establish a location in Eagle-Vail," he said. "Also, we've not experienced the gridlock throughou4 town that we had last year at this time." i Despite the slow use, Rose offered thanks to those who have used the service, thus far, and to the U.S. Forest Service and Vail Associates for joining the town's effort to keep vehicles out of town. The park and ride program will continue through Sunday, as scheduled. For more information, contact Rose at 479-2178. # # # TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road Bail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 27, 1993 Contact: Mike Rose, 479-2178 Transportation Manager VAIL WILL INCREASE BUS SERVICE FOR NEW YEAR'S EVE REVELERS (Vail)--The Town of Vail's free bus service will be increased on New Year's Eve in anticipation of the busiest day of the year. A record 43,000 passengers were carried on New Year's Eve last year. Friday's increased service will run throughout the day on most outlying routes and the in-town shuttle. On the East Vail route, buses will make stops at 10-minute intervals throughout the day and everiirig. The West Vail route will carry passengers at 15 and 20 minute intervals, while~the Sandstone route-will remain unchanged with service every 20 minutes. The Golf Course route will run separately from the Ford Park route, with service at 30 minute intervals for each. . _ Also, the number of buses on the in-town shuttle will be increased from 8 to 12. Although service is being expanded throughout the day, all routes will begin and end at their regularly scheduled times. # # # ROAD CLOSURE NOTICE FROM VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT (Vail)--Vail Valley Drive will be closed from Blue Cow Chute to the soccer fields from approximately 6 to 8:30 p.m. on New Year's Eve to accommodate the annual fireworks display. Spectators should plan to use the bus during the celebration. For more information, contact the Vail Police Department at 479-2200. # # # TOWN OF VAIL WILL SELL PARKING COUPONS ON NEW YEAR'S EVE (Vail)--The Town of Vail Finance Office will remain open from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on New Year's Eve to sell coupons for the parking structures. The Finance Office is located on the lower level of the Vail Municipal Building, 75 S. Frontage Rd. Other town offices will be closed on Dec. 31. # # # TOV Holiday Briefs/Add 1 BUS PHONES STAFFED ON NEW YEAR'S EVE (Vail)--The Town of Vail will staff its bus operations phone line from 2 to 10 p.m. on New Year's Eve to answer route questions from the public. The number, 479-2174, is also used for bus-related lost and found information. A second phone number offers 24hour bus schedule information at 328-8143. # # # HOLIDAY TRAFFlC FLOWING SMOOTHLY IN AND OUT OF Vi41L (Vail)--Holiday traffic in and out of Vail has been flowing smoothly, and has caused few problems for residents and guests, thus far. Vail Police Chief Ken Hughey says the highest volume of traffic occurred the _ evening of Dec. 23, causing the department to direct traffic at the West Vail interchange, in addition to the usual traffic control at the Main Vail 4-way. Since then, traffic delays have been minimal. Hughey says good road conditions and enactment of a traffic management plan may have contributed to the lack of "gridlock.° The traffic plan, which combines carpooling, staggered lift closures, increased bus service and other measures, will continue through Jan. 2. # # # ..v ~~vy~~y-v l ' 4 ~ CMLNewdetter-December 24, 1993 Page 11 \ CML WORKSHOP FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS LAKEWOOD SHERATON HOTEL - 360 UNION BLVD JANUARY 15, 1994 1~'1 a Lunch Registration and Coffee i~t Welcome and Introduction tits Roles and Relationshi s ~.i~ Gary Sears, CML Executive Board Shaping trends and forces Pecting President; Manager, Glendale T? municipal government Roles of elected officials t~`~', Conduct of Meetin s ~ g Council/manager relationships Parliamentary Procedure as a Useful Tool Effective teamwork and communication Loretta Simonson, Registered Parliamentarian Carl Neu, President Neu and Company Conflicts of Interest and . Open Meetings ~ Ad•ourn 1 Legal Responsibiliies of Public Officials ~ ~ ` Geoff Wilson, CML General Counsel t~'a Break Workshop Credit ~ ~ ~ Workshop participants who attend the-full day workshop will receive 7 credits towards their Municipal Elected Officials' Leadership . Balancing Your Personal Training Certificate. Sign-up and program " and Professional Ethics description forms will be provided in the ~ Dr. David Dalke, workshop packet for those not presently • Author and Management Consultant enrolled In the program. 1? TABOR Amendment Hotel Registration What you need to know: primer on TABOR Overnight room reservations at the Lakewood requirements & recent developments Sheraton can be made by calling (303) . David Broadwe/l, CML Staff Attorney 987-2000; ask for the weekend rate of $59. Registration Form - CME Workshop for Elected Officials Please submit a separate form for each participant. This form may be copied. Name Title Represents Phone Address City/State/~iR ' Registration Fee: $70 (member fee) $80 (nonmember fee). Non-refundable registration fee includes cost of materials and lunch. Return this form with fee no later than January 10, 1994, to the Colorado Municipal League, 1660 Lincoln St, Suite 2100, Denver, CO 80264. Make checks payable to Colorado Municipal League. t. Page 12 CMLNewsletter-December 24, 1993 , s ® ~ ~ Stroe! Tr'?r--;9 "~±^nlrzl; or Mscnici- concePrs of planning in non-technical lan- 1313 E. 60th St.; Chicago, IL 60637. palities, was expressly written for use by gunge. Smith explains the different roles Phone: (312) 955-9100. Price: $24.95 J~o~ tree commissions, public works direc- of planning officials and planning profes- (paperback); $36 (hard cover). ? tors, and others in small towns and cities sionals, and he tells all citizens interested involved in .the restoration of the beauty in good planning what they need to know ~ e • of their tree-lined streets. Author Richard about topics such as the master plan; D. Schein targeted small towns and ama- capital improvement programs; zoning; ' tears because of his long experience as a the regulation of land subdivision; and For sale and wanted to buy items may be planed tree commission chairman and as acon- the relationship of planning to school in this column at no charge to member munid- sultant to Penn State University, to state boards, community development func- palities Nonmember rates are $Z per line. The forestry departments, to utility compa- [ions, and citizens. deadline for dassitled ads is the Friday preced- Hies, and as advisor to Pennsylvania's Smith also addresses the problems ing the pubikation date. Newsletters are pub- - Municipal Tree Restoration Program. that communities currently face. For ex- llshed every other Friday. Help wanted ads may . The book covers all major aspects of a ample, he presents new techniques that be placed in the League's Colorado Job Finder tree program including writing an ordi- communities can use to manage growth. at no charge to member municipalities. Sub- nance and doing an inventory; selecting, He explores the trend of state govern- scriptionstotheJobFinderareavailablefor$20 transporting, and planting trees; redoing ments to mandate local planning. And he for six months; $'38 for one year, plus talc. To the downtown; and dealing with the con- looks at how recent legislation such as place a Job Finder ad, or for more information, flict of trees and wires. The 428-page the Intermodal Surface Transportation Ef- contact Barbara MaJor at the League office. To book also includes 239 illustrations, ficiency Act and the Clean Air Act place a For Sak or Wanted ad, call Janel Helt at seven appendices, and an index. Amendments will affect planning. the League oiHce. The book is available for $44, plus $6 Author Smith has retired from his po- postage and handling, from TreeWorks, sition as professor in the Graduate Pro- FOR SALE: 1992 Ford Crown Victoria po- 526 W. Nittany Ave., State College, PA gram in Planning and Community Devel- lice care. Cruise, tilt, power windows. Exc. 16801-4058. Phone: (814) 237-4437. opment at the University of Colorado, cond. Approx. 45,000 miles. Available Feb. 1, • The American Planning Associa- Denver. Before entering education, he 1994. $8,500. Contact Dale Hinz at (303) tion has published the third edition of was a practicing planner and public ad- g34-2852. ? The Citizen's Guide to Planning, by Her- ministrator for 25 years. ben H. Smith. The book covers the basic The book is available from APA, ::.~y~, ~ Cl~, ~Ie~sle~er (LISPS 075-590) $econd~lass postage ' paid at 1560 Lincoln Street, Suite 2100 ~ Denver, Colorado Denver, Colorado 80264-2101 - PAM BRAVDMEYER ASST TO b1.~NAGER , 7~ S FRONTAGE RD ; VAIL CO 51657-0000 ~ . Vail Associates ~S r~` l w~, 1 defends ~ lawsuit x ~a' ~ : I am writing in response to Mark O1r~ ~ ~ ie~ mascik's Dec. 5 article regarding Vail As~~; sociates' fee dispute with the U.S. govern"' ~.F~`*f. ment. The article was both misleadin'"'~" ~ - - and inaccurate and misre resented thy'- = . _ p . _ ~ . - essence of the suit. - ` . - _ er ees er vice for 24 ye rs g et a using thetsame msth of calculation, the Forest Service in 1965= ~u unilaterally .began insisting on the use of=~` a different cost basis contrary to the lah=`"` ~ ~ ~ ' guage contained in their original fee sys~;' tein and Vail's Forest Service contract'.~~~'z`~~+a` Vail Associates paid the fees under pro=Y ; r test and simultaneously filed its appeal;"~"':.? ~'s which is comparable to filing an appeal"';•.<:~. with.the IRS. A number of other Colorad~f ~ . ski resorts have also appealed the find- • - ;~4~; ings of the Forest Service with respect to fees. Obmascik's article would lead th~'F''.~t reader to believe that the government'^".,~_ filed suit against Vail Associate§, which'"~ simply isn't true. ~ ~,F~=£ In the opinion of our independent` ac="'" _ counting firm, Arthur Andersen & Co., "they' methods and amounts used for calculatingYill,;zs~> fees by Vail Associates are correct and iii 'j~'s full compliance with the requirements o~~;', their U.S. Forest Service permits." . ; The allegation of deception on the part ~°e of Vail Associates is insulting and inflam- ti:' . 1.~ ory n is con rary o every mg we r,K:; stand for as a leader in the ski industry. . . We at Vail Associates have been worki _ . with the Forest Service and other ski re-~ ` . sorts to simplify the overall fee struct - e c ntmuing to assure fair market . value to the government. tia,%' ANDREW P. DALI~~~~,.~<< President and Chief Executive Officer"`•'~.'° . Vail Associates Inc'.~;°h?T:~ .c7... } _ inn TIMES' NIIDWEE~~t Ei~ai N Avon cou lis u busks - g p . . fors er marketing _ ¦ By John Calhoun eight seats instead of seven. They also ' " ~ ~ ~ Times Midweek Editor want proof the valley-wide summer _ marketing effort is working. : ~ After more than a hour of discussion The agreement paves the way fora " Monday evening, Avon decided to be a summer marketing effort similar to team player and contribute $50,000 to what the valley has seen in past years. the Vail Valley Marketing Board and the Marketing board officials have been summer mazketing effort, but... hanging for several months as Beaver Avon council members want Vail to Creek and Avon .officials considered match its $50,000 general fund their involvement in the marketing contribution, and they want a more effort. } even distribution of the Vail Valley While Avon had contributed Marketing Board seats -two for Vail, $90,000 each of the past five summers, two for Avon, two for Beaver Creek, one marketing officials wooed Beaver Creek for Vail Associates and one for Arrowhead and Cordillera for a total of ~ See MARIi~li~JG, Page 31 1 STING---- . . _ _ .R~~ ~ FromPage IO Currently, Vail businesses pay i-;_ for the first time. But both entities $349,000 per year, the majority of the.,;" questioned the results of the mazketing marketing budget. Vail Associates,''.' effort, saying Vail receives the brunt of under a business license agreement the summer business and they are not the Town of Vail, pays $50,000. ~ . receiving enough bang for the buck. For the first time since the mazketing'= ~ - As a result marketing board officials board was formed in 1989, the Beaver ~ ~ agreed to somehow tabulate the success Creek Resort Company board agreed tod • - itch in $100 000. Vail has set aside j . _ - - - of the marketing effort to prove to the P - - - ~ various entities the effort works. $160,000 for summer marketing, but It is not clear if Vail will meet Avon's reportedly has not fully committed it to " _ request of another $50,000, or if the the board. marketing board will agree to Marketing Board President Tom ; reorganize its board structure. Vail Britz said last week the wheeling and ' started the marketing board with an dealing has to stop soon so the boazd, ordinance in 1989, and is its ultimate can begin its effort for the 1994 decision-maker. summer mazketing program. ~.,iry` :-'_t_. . ~ xr?~ BA.t~; - - - - - ---TIME DENVER PCfii' Sunday, December 26, 1993 no inforaned of 250 000 in bonuses Adams to a ers t ~ ~Y ASSESSOR from Pa e to f, "When you pay a bonus to 40 ~ ! ; ~ , rlf ~ .,t I;w.. ~ .r 9 I j;. = people, you can bet your life it gets f,~; The practice was halted sudden- _ ~ around. I don't tell them they have `+~a a~ers ~,rl~ ~~x,~,' ly this month when the commis- 7~ ' to keep quiet about it," Reale said.. • .~-o/ t sinners had to cut S6 million from The commissioners say that • the $130 million 1994 county bud- elected officials enjoy some lati- nO~ ~~Ol llle~'' get. As the cuts mere being an- tude in transferring budget sav- nounced, The Denver Post was k~~~ ings'to employees while heads of making inquiries about "confiden ~ . L e ~ other departments such as public •of bonuses tial" memorandums from Bill and r` ~ ~ 1 works must return unspent money, Reale to the finance department _ ' 2' to the general fund. ; ~ Atypical memo from Hill, dated _ According to Adams County fis- ~'S111Ce ' g7, Adarris officials Dec. 1, 1989, says: "Please issue cal director Terry Funderburk, the L Q c performance checks to the follow- commissioners scrutinized the .bo- .haVe paid OUti ~D2J000O ~ ing people as soon as possible. nos requests, which were submit- ~ Please consider this matter confi- Assessor Pat Reale ted to the payroll department. By Alan Katz dential in nature and notify me "There was no veil of secrecy Denver Poer Brae wraar . personally when the checks are traded the informal request at the over the process," he said. "Those, t`. BRIGHTON - Without taxpayers ready and I will pick them up." commissioners' suggestion. expenditures were made within knowledge, Adams County•AsseseogPat ~ ~ Hill then listed 22 treasury de- °We did try unsuccessfully to the parameters of an established: ' Relale and Treasurer Helen Hill havb dls- partment employees with bonuses curtail them (earlier)," said Com- and authorized budget, and if there; btltsed $250,000 in year-end bonuses to totaling $24,911. Hill sent similar missioner Elaine Valente. was any discussion with the com=~ their employees since 19871 ~ memos the following three years. The commissioners, who hold missioners it was done in a public The county commissioners gavethelr Her budget last year was $1.07 the county's purse strings, an- study session. They were subject to; consent to. the payouts, which came,_from million. pounced this month they were audit and the records were avail= department. surpluses the public `never County sources believe the pay- eliminating 100 positions through able for public inspection." knew existed. Had the bonuses not-been; menu may date back before 1987, attrition and an enhanced retire- Ex-Commissioner Jim Nelms " paid, the money would have gone back •td , although records were not imme- ment plan and laying off 15 work- explained that, though he disap- the general fund. { ~ diately available. Hill has been ers. Some services were reduced. proved of bonus payments, he did County records show that each ye r be- treasurer since 1979, and Reale Reale, whose budget was $1.4 little to stop them. tween 1987 and 1892, Hlll and Jteal~ sufKuH has been assessor since 1967. million in 1992 -the last year bo- "It was difficult to say no to milted inter-office memos to the finance`. Reale's bonuses. add up to noses were paid -lashed out at elected officials, I have to admit,' department requestiFig'"performance" $100,000 for the six years, while The Post for his inability to offer Nelms said. a:~ payouts. Bonuses requested by Hlll;tt4ere another $50,000 was received and additional bonuses from his $1.3 Nelms said the commissioners the heftiest, rioMling $150,n00, e4 disbursed by former County Clerk million budget this year. would ask Hill and Reale each Ed Sokol and current Clerk Bob "I cut corners and saved money year at budget negotiations if they' 't Please see ASSESSOR.on 8A':~ Sack in 1989 and 1990. and now I don't get to reward intended to pay bonuses. - Hill, who has earned high marks these people," said Reale. "The way they would generate for investing the rnunty's money, The assessor said his employees money for the bonuses was to take was out of town and unavailable deserved additional compensation. it from positions that hadn't been for comment, said an employee. When asked why the requests were filled for months," said Nelms.: Sources say the treasurer again made confidentially, he replied "And I want you to know that we broached the subject of year-end that bonuses were hardly a secret never gave our own employees bo- bonuses early this month, but re- at the administration building. noses." t Adams assessor gets property tax break Adams County Assessor Pat on the block, the newest of the cratic Party chose him to run for Reale enjoys an annual $1,000 three, is appraised at $275,000, assessor in 1966. property tax break, thanks to or $105 per square foot. Several events have marred someone in.his office who under- Reale last week denied he Reale's 27th year in office. In - appraised the boss' home'by knew the appraised value. of his October, the state board of $60,000, public records show. home and protested that it equalization ruled that Adams Reale's 2,685-square-foot wasn't as fancy as his neighbors' County property was valued too house, which adjoins The Ranch and lacked a basement. low and ordered it reappraised. golf course in Westminster, is Nor, he said, did be know The following month, a dis- appraised at $166,000. That's which appraiser at his office set trict judge removed Reale from $85,000 less than the 2,902- the value of his home. office for refusing to take a square-foot home of Reale's "I never look at my 8pprais- state-mandated appraiser's li- next-door neighbor: als," he said. tensing. test. The 74-year-old Democrat's Asked to speculate why the as- Assistant Attorney General custom-built brick house over- sessment contrasted so dramati- Donna Rice said that the state looks the third tee, a factor that tally from his neighbors', he had considered filing criminal adds ;50,000 to the value`of the said,"It might have been an ap- charges against Reale before de- ' home, said a Realtor at The praiser who was trying to get on tiding on suing him instead. Ranch sales office. the good side of me." After the state won its lawsuit "You couldn't touch a house Adams County records show in district court, Reale appealed. like that for less than ;300,000," that Reale pays about $1,000 less The Colorado Supreme Court lat- the Realtor said, adding that in taxes than his next-door neigh- er intervened, returning Reale to property values have appreciat- bor, Deanna McAninch; for ba-. his $50,000-a-year job while it ed 20 percent in two years. sically the same-sized house. determines the constitutionality Because county appraisals McAninch declined to comment.. of the statute. A decision is ex- tend to lag market values by two Reale's daughter, Judy Vil- petted by July. ' years, those figures indicate that lano, also owns a house at The Last week, Reale also disputed Reale's home should have been .Ranch that measures 2,086 accounts by his staff that he fre- - appraised at about $250,000, .'square feet. Located several quently arrives late to'work, and comparable to similar homes on blocks from the golf course, Vil- often fails to return from lunch. his block. lano's home is valued by the "I have meetings to attend," Despite its beauty and pictur- county at $153,000, or $74 per he said. "I can't stay in the office esque location, Reale's home square foot. The home of Villan- all the time because I don't have carries the lowest appraisal - o's next-door neighbor, Richard any work to do there, My job is about $62 a square foot. A house Coates, is appraised at $174,000, meeting the public. He11, I put i~ two lots from Reale's, though even though Coates' house is .140 damn near six or seven hours ev= 109 square feet smaller, is val- square feet smaller. ety day.",;.:~~'~ ued at ;228,000, or about, $88 a Reale was appointed a justice ~ . square foot, while a third home of the peace before the Demo- O ~ R - filan Katz :r: ~ _ _ . ~ . ~ii' ~ 1. Y. i• :,1. . - :,v V-/, ~ rxpioringTittlay'~ite~IfUes _ ~~R t ~ ~ x~: ~ ~ ~ ' : THURSDAY, DECEMBER 30, 1993 ~ , Q~ae~-4 r. ~,~f:` ~ ~r JACK KEMP - ` Co-Director • Empower America Guest Speaker j . TI-IE WESTIN P.ESORT • UAIL . Breakfast 7:30 aaa~ Program 8:00 - 9:00 am ""s $ 15 per person ' s ~ POR THE I'UTiLIC ~;~.lr ~ Reset~•aiions Necessary: call 476-0954 _ _ . ~ - "Why We Are Supporting Senator Frank Lautenberg" ~ Frank R. Lautenberg, U.S. Senator from New Jersey since 1983, came to the Senate from a successful career in business. He was a founder and Chief Executive Officer of Automatic Data Processing ~ (ADP), the largest computing company in the world. Since coming to _ the Senate, Frank has made his mark on a wide variety of issues, including the economy, environment, foreign affairs, and transporta- tion. The legislation he wrote on intellectual property protection made it tougher for foreigners to steal America's creatively patented and copyrighted materials. He has always been a staunch supporter of Israel and wrote a Senate resolution to give Israel the loan guarantees it was promised. It passed in the Senate 99 to 1. He has been especial- ly effective in protecting Israel's military and economic security through his memberships on the Senate Appropriations Foreign Operations and Defense Subcommittees, which directly affects foreign aid and U.S.-Israeli strategic cooperation. Frank wrote the "no smoking in airplanes" legislation and raised the drinking age across the country to 21. Increasing the drinking age saves more than 1,000 young lives a year and that figure could be sig- nificantly higher if the law were more rigidly enforced. + As Chairman of the Senate Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee, the airport presently being built in Denver was begun as a result of Frank's direct involvement and support. This airport will expedite air travel across the country, improving schedules and access to all airports including Vail's Eagle County Airport. These are a few of the Senator's many initiatives which we fully support. We hope you'll join us to make certain that he is there to con- tinue his excellent record on issues of concern to all of us. R.S.V.P. Yes, I wilt attend and will contribute to Senator l~utenberg's campaign fund. Enclosed is my check for I am unable to attend, but want to help Senator l~utenberg and will contribute: $ FEDERAL LAW REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Name Address City State Zip Home Phone Office Phone Occupation Place of Business/Employer PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE LAUTENBERG COMMITTEE. Corporate checks are not permitted. Contributions are not deductible for Federal income tax purposes. Each individual can contribute up to $2,000 ($1,000 for the primary election and $1,000 for the general election). If you wish to contribute $2,000, please designate $1,000 primary - $1,000 general on your check. Paid for and authorized by the Lautenberg Committee. PLEASE RETURN TO ANDY DALY, P.O. BOX 7, VAIL, COLORADO 81656 i f 3;-39 ~I'lease join ~ Senator rFrank ~R..Gaute??bery nn avid skier and long-time friend of t/ie `Vail `Valley for .~"pres Ski Refreshments and a 7X~ashu?gton update on rI'Fiursday, December 3°~ 1993 3:3o to 5:3o p.m. 7Fie .L'odye at `Vail `Vail Room Co-(osterf ~y Windy 7~aly and Jeorge Jillett Individuals $Soo RSVrI'to .~ndy manly ~3°3~ 479-3°'S ...:F,.._ _ . . . , . , . . JAPl-03-19'34 20 ~ 17 FPOhI DR HER$EF'T WEP.THE I M TO 9130347E5531 P . 01 . fir. 3{erder~ aruf ~ico~ 21lertheirn Fourcdat-iori December 29, 1993 4 1994 RECEIVED JAN ° Mr. Merv Lapin, Councilman (~,~u M 232 ~ West Meadow Drive -1" fJ Vail, Colorado Dear Merv, On behalf of the citizens of Vail and the Vail Valley I request that the council consider continuing to set aside the proposed site for the Vaii Performin; Arts facility. Our Foundation took a poll at the library's Vail Palley Citizen of the Year award and more than two hundred and fifty attendees voted "yes" for a performing arts facility with only one person objecting. It has been almost four years since our Foundation made a challenge grant to the town to construct a Performing Arts facility. '~Ve still believe it is a most urgent and integral part of the educational, cultural and financial health of our community. Our Foundation would Like the Town of Vail to consider working jointly with it to . determine what new design criteria would most tit the needs of the citizens of the town and the Vail Valley. . I will personally become involved in assuring that we can design and fund this project with mostly private funds and minimal public funding, Our Foundation would pickup whatever out-of-packet costs necessary for the preliminary redesi~ of the proposed facility. I hope that with your help and that of the other Councilmen at the upcoming town meeting we can assure that this property will continue to be set aside for this important project. Please advise me as to what I may do to assist you in this endeavor. Sincerely yours, Dr. Herbert and Nicole Wertheim Foundation Dr. Herbert A. Wertheim Chairn~an . HAWJjsb . 191 Leucaafert~fra'Lhit~e, Cvral'C~ad les. ~'Garida 3.~15b. '1e~hor~e: (30S).~.64-6l8.~ --"l-- ~ - - TOTAL P.01 DEC 31 '93 1233 THE INVESTMENT GROUP P.1 ~Ef! ,l~owcn • ~ 6047 Mein Gore GrCle $0 December 1893 Va11. tofaado 81657 Donald L. Crews. ~ Assistas,t Dean College of F~.;.stry and Natural Resources Colorado state Unit.. ~3ity Fein Collins, Colorado 80523 . Dear Mr. Crews: Your name was given to ~e by Mary Ha11. a Ph.. D., c~adidate in the depart,...:...t of p'ishery, , cad WIldlife Biology. wbo is working with VaiY Associates to develop ' an emriroamental Program for them. - ~ itt~n 8 member of the L .-y- d , ad' dirertors' of a -prc~Yt Vail argsretzation Called ` Trees f~?r Vat], which. each. •year. plants app~aodmately .250 L :.:.a iA varLous ' sC~'r'ed areas r?hiGh aria proximate to ~nt~a .atStl' ~0.. YD three and one half years. - Trees~'Por Vail has ~~.vn ,a handful of people to eri prganization which has several- i~undred ~roluntcera and is .fuxlded b~? t]he town, tt~e loos]. Rotary slab and by d sigaticant number' of ndfvidu$l. donatipns. , CSU and the Colorado State ; Fopreet'~Sr;. ia~e ha~re been mayor ..partners in the program. aiad have been keys to t~1e $11....,%,9 n[ • T.:.:..ti for V$tL • Late last Pall. the Trees for 'Vail board'~decided to,explore what things, fn addition #o planting trees. it could institute to help the' en~ciiran,,, ~,,.t. Edutmtiori was , • number ouc on, the list,. and `we ha've' since been rt~wearchfng how an eduCaUa~l2tl program might ' be "i:stabiished which would oanopliment our other acttv~tties. ; ' As part: of the =esearrh. ,several organizations iri Vail were approached to it the educational program Could beao~ a... `~...munity effort. , T'he response has - been extraordfaary, and five hre haw beg3~riAing to focus on how the program might. he,.-instituted, the siu6~ects which slCOUld be taught, the logistics, narketiirig; funding, academic staff, program size, etc. _ Because of our , amsiderable association with CSU, Y decided that we should sp, proach t1u' unlv~rsity-;and your department to see if it would be willing to be a ~o3nt venture partxter !`or academics on.the pro3ect. f have attached .ex..:,...t~d V~ . espoi~deacye grid a . ,uu~aor~t~adtlm which ;desd~ibes ~ my Concept for the educational progriapd. Early next week .I am going"to fiave breakfast with Chris R;yman, executive viva president of ~!afY Associates, to see if our plan Arid the environiaex~ital program ,which VA enw~ioir~s can 'lave-ta31. Myr guess is they will not, we ax'c ~L. ~f32Y fnte..:.,'„ed thin offering axt academic course on the ' ea~.....,ment; and !!rom early.oo»versatiaans,<V;A Is interested in offering a grogram of anti l: ~:.u>aental experiences on ttie; ski mountain. If your schedule p.:...dts, I .would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you anytime rafter January first,. in Fort Collins. to see . ff an association might be established' and to learn your thoughts on courses which would be appropriate for the e~aviironmental edu..~.l:oa program. . P~ost•R° brand fax transrnitt~t memo 76711 r a , , Jeff Bowen t.~ el d S'r~¢of S ~ ~~~-~o_~/ f+? io.pe. phone A ~l'7` ~Z701 ~`~,~R'~ Z~ ~,~L--woo i DEC 31 '93 12~ 34 THE IN1rw i i'IENT GROL~ P.2 - SX~nr TS FROM Lrsa t,oyn. l)Ax~ 22 N.~r~:,.~~,bet' ]1.993: Elizabeth Eber. Director yail valley IilStfittitc I The. Vail Valley Fowadat3oaa POB 3Q9 • Vail, Colorado 81658 • As you m~ know I am a member of the board. of d:. ~~,.~s o[ T. ~ Poor Vail, and tr. ttie fall,'we have men ~fsca~sing adding 8n' educational component to its activitle#s_ What .we ha~tre ib mind is . to create a oaurse which would last far .perhaps' two„or threeweeks, wb9icb. wiould be avaUat?le to high school students . throughout the Stag. of Coliora$o. ;.The course would .tie a liberal at'ts course on the environ~oaent' wind would contain a discussion of ~ ~ lronmen#al issues, the biology aa~ ecology off, the eriv the L;vt,.~t~iOnCN. and intergo~+~;.:a..mentai relat~ans .associated with t>Ye en " o t anal perhal?s a, study oC the economics and law ~ t~?e enviroiaa~erit._, S ~ : arms ' fight include a diswssian oY the _ cutting ~ aP ttie rSi><i for+9st .in .South A~aicfca and the environmental, economic and political- iaitpaCks: ~ CreA.teB, the friction : bet~ws~n : en~'froinmentialtsts and loggers, tie mounting _problem of trash and tl1e. otrnooudt~nt ._pollution problems for water ' and Land, tte .economics of _forest and range and witdli~e managenleat. the relat{o~slt#p : or .,piarits "and industrial c~emk~ls _ih the air, and recycdiag Rrooesseg, particularly relating to Paper' products. Needless bo say there are other fasuea wbicb should be coti r- :.d;:ia the course, which better acadeaaic minds Hiatt >r can debermin~. • As I envisfon it, the course would be taught . by CSU prai'essors, as GSct is really t1~e'center cif "environmental studf~es in Coloradd and additi~oa~Uy CSU is where the Colorado ~Departm~iat oe F..~:.wtxy ia..bascd, which would nave an adjunct role Por .field ~ i~.s, and spec3i'icity bn the, en~ri~o~ament in Colorado. Students would receive credit,far the ouur_se. which would ice tau~tt fn Ysil. ixt June, pexh~.ps in vanlunctioia r~vith the tree ~plaa.~..+g activities and .Institute meetings. . . Students (and Pamil#es) would.. be housed im one aa:~ more local hotels. dosses mgght be..held,at CMC,,:tl~te Mou~xt,SCho_ of our in oohf,;..,~..oe moms oP the hovels, ' studetrts would Lave _the opportanfty go'OYI giuided hikes oa- climbs. participate to organized ;soclial . activ'ittes. ; go ;aao field' . `trips ,and tiier:.f ~.Y ,L~ enjoy Dart op the summer Sn Vail: ~ The objective' would tie' to `~oi'fez~ . a significant educational e~perieriae which would be !nn for the students and give them an awareness of t>~e envir~ano.ment. ~ Would the Institute. be #~ltereStad . is g fa. ~ c.,y wft'h ~'Y es for Vail to organize y. a venture,;suc>l~-as this?.. I think ft tippers, .a: mutual ~ benefit--anal actually a be>c~Pi.~t "to Vail--fQr it purpose I am also go~ag to pin.`CIe here in early June for an interesting SU, CMC quad: the Department of Forestry to request their help pn establishing the program. • Yf a fadnt effort can . be structured among ail a[ us, we c~ offer as educational. e?cpeurl~:nOG that !will. ire substantive and will help the next ~en~erattoxt focus on cad therefore cope with 'the environment. Best Itegards, - " r DEC 31 ' 93 12~ ~ THE INVE~ i ~ iuiT (~20UP ~ P. 3 ' MEMORANDU2~i . T0: ASSOCIATBS AND OOLI?&4GU8S FOR r~us PROPOSED TFV TIDUCATTOAI PLAN FRpM: ,~ur~ BQW~i DATE: 9 DBC6rarisn 1993. RBVl58b 3Q DECEI?,~ri 1893 To start as educ~atio~nel progxao~ spar boarding students, p~sibly with their ajnilies. every ]og~isticxl ai~8 .~u~.dea<~c ooa~paue~it must , be ..,.sidered. I therePbre . ~B~am rr ~rarii$ ~~s ai.:..~x:.~~ ~ndum using . my es='lieI' ie~tter to Elizabeth Sher. . .which outlined my thoughts an the plan, then tried to tlziiok at every question ; which should be answered as we focus on estab2ishtng the ~ L.. ~~ntal educ~on program. I. academics { How long should th~ course be? _ ! ~ . Wbat fields should it cover? ' the ea~yste® the .biology of ,the en.......ment economics' and law of the environment . fnt~?a~.tiozat relations of the en?.h~„n~neut (Cutting the Rafu Forest) tke environment axtd logging trash ~ana recyciiug 'eoonomic:s of forest, range and wiidlffe management plants":arid. izdusrt~-ial cliemicais io the air/w~l,~ the F:.. y L anmeaat cif the pocky Maunfains ~ . . the ein~vfroiament , sand ~ining (Nagle Mine) - r~....:.~,tfon and the ear. ~ ~,.ment. popul~stiori Bud the en. ~..,~.inex~t _ _ ' .~JtB~eO~Ogy 0~' h~al~u ~ Of <tile :a. r ~I'bYlmellt . - . geology as:. part c~ the ~ 1. onment . pollut~n--l~uad, sca, aiyr, use. '~veathr~r .How can these academic fields be~:.,,~~dinated to b:.,~~...~e a corhesive course? , As an laterdisciplianary course. how ~anY ~L~,~,hel'slPrai ~ are needed? How much aP the course should be taught in the elassroo® and how much in the field? Where should the ci~.~....,ms be? Shaaild the program be far high sGh[ao1 students, onllege students or both? What soz-t o[~aeademie Credit Can/should be offered to the students? Should there be a gradepadnt/age requirement to be admitted? Should parents be allor?ed to per. acipate? How many students should be admitted? i ~ i s , t i. DEC 31 '93 12~ 35 THE INVEai ~ iuiT C~tOUP P.4 What shoaild the daffy schedule be-- ..Classes 3n the m..~, ~.i~..g then acti'vft~es or field trips in the afternoon? or the r,~.. Or alternate dart's? II. EXTRA CURFZCULAR A~:. ~ ~ ~ x any bfkiug ' climbing ratting . social events . plantfng . an.,;....fght campfng/Piney I~alce SYYYYL /Y't1IIIIln$/1gp11... YMM.fa • sailing--Dfllon Rea:. ~ ~:t~ horseback riding . ' How mach Yree time? What yr r~ a[ social ~ ..:,s? Should all hiking/C13mbing be Yield trips? Should a boor of 'the Bugle Aline be faClnded? Should pa.~,.:s be included in nonefsome/aU a,.,~ a~.~[.lties? III. LOGISTICS Should one or several hotels lodges .be the boarding oe~r? ~ - . .Should . we or should we_ sot fnvite families to opm~e with the students, and iY' wre it4wite i'aioiles~should we ha~ ~pecfal ~Ctivities for theID7 What soil, athletic our re... ~;,r;lonal s.;y +.1Ces if ~ : ~ d wC uct out3 t .r I What is the tonal V.,,,L at the.oourse per person. Should we approach the Town a~ Wail, Vl1, the Fouiadat~or? or ~ CSU Por a grant bo +9•llow students tiros low income famflies ,to attend? . Should- we iriclutle all meals.. activities. books. and ela.,ry~ as a package ar should y+e show s ~ . ~ , , fTeadbility in the program? What will be -the costs for the t..~~:.ers/p...Tessors and can par~ttal donatlot~.s be achieved ii' we provide lodging? ~ , . ~ • j - . World the partidpants help plsn't trees or be h1v ed in other e...L:.lt3es in Vail sucl'i as Vail valley Institute programs? Should the course be packaged ~by 81Q existfng +eAtlty such as the 7~~;tuts, Vail Mountain School CMG. VA. Town Gf Vail, Foundation oocr Should & board be i 1 DEC 31 '93 1236 TFIE INVESTMENT g20UP P.5 established to orgaxuze sna.;admini~t::. the prgiect in ooordinatio~u with T~~,.,..L for Valk.. I73G.o BYlG~ tl3C Otllel' 'per. t~pp8t1I2g eIItitiBS~ IV. MARi~,si.u~tCx What f~s the ~~ss to ca...~.~s high schavls for stud:...as? Is there a mailing last? What ~t of a brocbu~re ue~eds to be prem. ;.d? What s<u-t a~ additional marketing should be done? Should we approach 1. a~41 ageacles? Should ad ~ ~ using be completed d g sla season for slat customers? Should 'the ovuarse be limited to respdexrts or should ft be nationally 8v~ilSbleT Should we do a pllgt pmgraaa in 1994, probably for local students, or should we `wait u~at31 1995 and establish fbh program? 1 1 DEC 31 ' 93 12~ 36 TF~ INlrw i i iu~IT C~OI~ P. 6 ~ ' Copies sent to: ~ Mfke ,Mollfca. Todd Oppenheimer,~Jonathan Staufer--Ti+V Board a~ Dirt~,~.,,,, e ~ Mark . Zfpf~I,;±•Kat~hryn. Helier-- ~or8 Alpine Carden ? Peter Abuisi--Bead magter, veil Mountain School . Bllzabeth ~~l~er-=Dbrector. Va31 Valley Ynstitute RusSeIi . Foirrast--En . L ..nmeat~I Ott€oer, Town oP Vail PegBY; Osterfoss--MSyQr. Towu of .Vail Y.itif~y Yogari--President,. Vail Rotary Club Jatin{ I:ange--S~perin~end, Eagle County School Distrfct .Kay Saulsbury--Iai; y~t~:.~.., Vafl.~CamptYS. Colorado Mountain College Ph~7.ip HcePt~--Colorado ~atate Forest ~ toe Mary Ball--CSU Jpe Macy Vafl Associates ~ F:L.:oia~ TPJk-~-VaA , asium . k . , SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ;12-27-93 ; 15 34 ; 3Q33287207-~ 3034792157;# 1/ 4 r RECEI !/F® Jq 1 ~ 3 1994 December 27, 7 993 - 71:53 - _ .ice cn~F ~ourory [2u1LPINti ~ 5S1 BRf?AUWAy dFFtCE t)F THE ~ ~ P.U. [30X liSU UOARDUF COiMMI5510NE65 CAtiIE. CUIdRA!)l~ 81631 (303) ~28•StiUS ,;~i~' FAX (303) 3ZN 72A'I EAGLE ~t~?L1~ITY, COLt~RAD~J A~~NDA gOAtRD !~F ~QUNTY CC.~f~Nti,~lt~NER~ REGULAR~~~,M~LTIl~JG DAY JANUARY 3, 1, 9;~~- 09:00 - 10:30 WORK SESSIONS ~=;~WEEICLY UPDATE . ± . Mt of the Holy Cross Roorn Jack D.:. Lewis, County Manager '10:30 - 1:00 BREAIt ~ - ; 17:04 - 7 2:00 WCIRK SESSION` PENdING LITIGAT{ON urt of lho Holy Cross noartt James, R _Fritze, County Attorney _ 1:00 - bi:30 LUNCH - . 0'1:30 - 02:30 WORK SESSIQN MEETINGS ATTENpEp Mt at the Ffoly Cross Room , 02:3D - p2:45 CONSENT CALENpAR Eaplo Cotmty Room . Items of a routine end non-co.~aovora~el imture ere r'ro~ on tho wnaent anlOndsr to ells W th8 Sonrd Of County Convnisaonsre to spend its limo end energy on more Important iterrm an q lengthy agenda. My Commmsior,$r may ¦+queet toot wt Item be "IIONOVED- from the ctu>aent oalender and aonaidared aeparotely. any member of the pubtiq may "ket2UE5T" any'item be "REMOVED" from this Caasanl gponde. 1. BILL PAYING ' ; ~ Linda Pankuch, Accounting Mark $ilv.artF~orn, Cantroiler ACTICIN: Approval subject to review by the County Manager. 2. PgYtriq[,L FOR, JANUARY fir .7994 . Jack D. Lewis, CourttY Manager ACTION: Approval subject to rriview by the Ci~unty Manager. C:1~611DUCSWANU03.ao6 ~ , SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ;12-27-93 ; 15 34 ; 30332872071 3034792157;# 21 4 3. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETRWEEN EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO ANb THE MUNICfP'ALI7'1f=S OF EAGLE C011NTY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES Bob Slagle, Animal Cvntroi Director ACTION: Consider approval. 4. COLORADO DEPARTMENT 01= TRANSPOR'T'ATION ACCESS PERMIT I~OR IMPRC1VEMENTS TO SaUAW CREEK ROAD AND HIGHWAY G INTERSECTION i.arry Metternick, County Engineer 5. BID ACCEPTANCE FOR ONE 7 984 FORD RANGER SUPER-CAB XL - RI`PLACEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLE Biii Smith, Motor Pool Director ACTIt)N: Consider approval. [y. LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE COUNTY AND NWCCOG FOR ELtiNATOR INSPECTION PROGRAM Mike Bradley, Building and Grounds Supervisor ACTION: Cansidar approval. 02:46 - 43:CIO A. LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF EAGLE AND soots county Floarn THE WESTERN. ,EAGLE COUNTY AMBULANCE 1bISTRICT Mary Jo.Berenato, Deputy County Attorney ACTION: Consider approval:.' ~ a B, FINAL Se+ r CEMENT WITH SUMMIT VIEW, ING. REGARDING THE SUMMIT AN[I RIDGE 111 SUBDIVISIONS Larr1R Metterriictc, County Engineer ACTION: Consider approval:.' C. SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION IMPF~OVEMENTS AGREEMENT,,FOIi. CORDILLERA SUBDIVISION FILING 7 ANQ 2 . Mary J.o Berenato, Deputy County Attorney ACTION: CansEder approval,,' ' D. REQUEST FC)R .PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEED FOR TRUST RELEASING GERTAlN LOTS FOR THE HOMESTEAa, EAC3LE COUNTY, COLORADO. PURSUANT TO FIESOLUTIQN NUMBER 93.7 37 , i~: Mary Jo'Ber~enato, Deputy County Attomey ' ACTION: Consider approval., C:1wP611DOCt3~lANU03.AdE i 1 SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ;12-27-93 ; 15 35 30332672071 3034792157;# 3/ 4 E. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SECOND PARTIAL RELEASE Ot= IrOLLATERAL FOR RED ROCK t3ANC1-I PARTNERS Phill SCdtt, Engineer ACTION: Consider approval. F_ THIRD INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAGLE Cf~1,1NTY AND TOWN OF GYPSl1M FOR BUIt.DING INSPECTION SERVICES Gerry Best, Building Department ACTION: Consider approval, . 03:OQ - 0$:30 LIQUOR LICENSE HEARINCa - L TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP - BEAVER CREEK LODGE ASSOGIATION dba BEAVER CREEK LODGE II, RENEWA! -LYNN L(NDSARY dba PIER 13 LIQUOR tll, RENEWAL - FiTZ51MMIafdS MOTOR GOMPANY Mary Jo Bsren~lto, Deputy County Attorney ACTION: Consider approval, 08:3D - 03:45 HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION, FILING NUMBER BLOCK 11 gala ~~~++v R~~~ -REQUEST BY DEVELOI~ER FOR IVIAINTENANCE OF STRCr,: a S Larry Nletternick, County Engineer Brad Higgii~is, Rawl and Bridge Supervisor ACTION: Consider rgpprov~l 03:45 - 04:00 BREAK ~ 04:00 - 04:30 ABATEMENT.'HEARINGS - FA~re county Roam 8. SEATTLE FIRST'.NATIONAL BANK 5ohedule,`;iiimber; 32994, 329989-32992, 323955- 3000,' 340Q4 $4005, 30770-30773, 053Q0, 307$8, 33703 ._r,. fa. DOUGLAS P,; WHITE Schedule 'number: 118471 C. PHILIP & bEB SCHECHTER Sched~ile. nuritiber: 19575 Allen Black; County Assessor ACTi1+DN: Consider approval 04:30 - 04:45 OPEN MEETING' . Caela Gately Roam 04:45 - WORK SESSf'1)N = LlNDHOLIVI LANb EXCHANGE Mt of tha Holy Cwaa Raon~ Blll POSt t "i THE Nrxr MCE7ING DF n IE EA[sLE coUfJrY t:DMMIS51t7NERS WILL dE IlEL4 0~1 JANUARY d, 198-0 PHIS AGENDA IB PADVI4l:U FOR INFgRN1ATIClNAL PURF'US£S UNLY -ALL TIMES ARE APFROxIMATE THE BOARn WHILE IN 6ESSIOPJ MAY {:QNSIOU! Q7'IiER ITENJ$ y}IAT ARE WiOU(il R BEFORE IT, C:IWf'611DOCSUANU03.AGF 'l I~'. . . SENT BY ~ EAGLE COUNTY ;12-27-93 ; 15 36 3033287207-~ 3034792157; # 4! 4 December 2a, 1983 - 7 x:49 rnsll- COUNTY BUf1.ClINt; pFFICC C?F iHC r4 • , y„~;Y,.•.' ~ P.D. BOX 85U BOARD L~F CdMMIStiIONER~ - kAGLE, Cc~Lt~RAI)O 81631 3DJ 38.8805 l } rAJ(: (303} 3]8.7?07 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO AGENDA B~1A~iD O~ ~CIUNTY Ct~IVlMI~I~JIVER `lE: PLANNING MEETING DAY JAN~JARY 4, 7 9~4 _..f' } 8 iF 4 81 Y 4 a? 9F dl 4 10 iF iF 4! 1P iF dF ~~g '.ib; '1P F ii ~F t & iF •t t iF 9t t it 9k iG ~F ~F dF M , . 10:0(1 - 11:00 a.m. ZS-34p-93-Tawn"'ot Avon Temporary Transit Facility EegleCOUnriRoem Paul Clarkson, Planner, Cammunity Development ACTION: Consider a Special Use Permit to allow uae of the former StolpDrt Term±na(ancl parking areas as a temporary transit and public works _falGility fior the Town of Avon. 11:00. 11:1.5 a.m. LUR-009-93=~~:e~ption 2.18,01 gyp), Eagle County Land Use Eagte~ Gaun[y Hoom RegUlatlons Kelth P. Montag, Director, Cammunity Development ACTION: Consider Land Use Regulation change. 19:15 - 11:30 a.m. PLAT, RE50Lt„lTION, AND DOCUMENT SIGNING Sid Fox,., Manager, Manning D!vlsivn, Cammunity Development 11:30 - 11:45 a.m. PD~29&$3-AF3-Amended Final Plat, Lot 8, 1=ding 8, EaplaGountyRaom Cordillera Subdivision, The Ranch Sld Fox.; Manager, Planning Division, Community Development ACTItJN: Consider approval of request to arY~end the platted building envelope for tot 8. A 'i1-IC NEXT Mtt:TIN$ Of 'nib EAGLE cpUNTY coMMt53ioNEAS WILL BE HELD ON JANUARY 10, 1984 . YHiB AGENDA IS PROYp]ED FC1R INFORMA 114NAL F'l1HPQ5ED ONLY • ALL 71NES IlrtE Ar rn~.~IMATE. 'THE BpARO WHILE IP1 SESSION NAY CONSIDCfi OTHER irEMS THAT APE BROUGHT BEFORE R. it 1; 3033287207-- 303792157;# ll 1 SENT BY~EAGLE COUNTY ;12-29-93 15 04 ; oFF~cE~.~~mber 29, 1993 - 14:40 : EAGLE wuhrCY Butt.D1A1G 5t)D Ii1tOAhWAY ttlUN lY N1A1iAGER P.t). 17OX 85D (3031 3).$-860.5 F.AL;LF., Ct7(.ORnri4 8163!-U850 FAX: (3031 37,8.720% tint E~1ClLE ~~UN1Y, G~L~[tADt~ MEMORANDUM 7'0: All medls and interested parties FROM: Jack D. Lewis, County Manager a ~ ~ is } ~y.. DATE: December 29, t 993 - 14:40 ~ . • .I4i.4 RE: GHAIVGES TD AOENbd# FOa t?. C_ B ~ ~F COMPNt35tO~ERS The follpwing item has been changed/added to the .January 4, AgBnda. k AdDED: al ~ 09:317 - 10:00 WC1RK SES$fOIV -PLANNING ISSUES Mt of the Rory Cross Room Paul Clarkson, Planner If you have any questions please calf Tom Jgnkins, (7ffice Assistant at 328-8605. Thank gout JDUtj . cc: Beard of County CammiSSioners James R. Fritze, County Attbrnay „ , ' Allen Sartin. FfnanGe Director ' , Sara Fisher, Clerk & Recorder JBCk Ingst2~d, Pubiic Information Clffice;': . ~ s J j i, - . ~ f.. ~ ~ ~ c:l4VP~111wC81FRANCES1MEAr10RANp,nc~ WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP December 30, 1993 Page 1 of 1 TOPIC QUESTIONS FOLLOW-UP SOLUTIONS 1991 11,/19 NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES TOM M./JIM C.. What can be done to make these uniform Problem will be resolved by 1/1/94. Planner has been and priority will be and locations less prolific? reassessed. 1992 11/10 COUNTY REGIONAL MEETINGS Next meeting to be announced. 1993 10/19 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF COUNCIUSTAFF: Follow-up and respond to petitions Appraisal underway. TRAPPER'S RUN PARCEL presented at 10/19193, TC Regular Evening meeting. 10/19 URD CONTRACT LARRY G./TOM M./STEVE T.: Council direction received If VRD agrees to Council terms and conditions, Bob McLaurin is 11116/93. authorized to sign contract 1217193. 10119 FOREST ROAD STREET TOM M.: Urge Joe Macy to work with Bruce Chapman and Dialogue continuing between effected parties, although no written CONTRACT WIVA homeowners so street use agreement can be signed prior agreement has been submitted at this time. Tom M. has spoken with to ski season opening 11113/93. both Rob Sperberg (VA) and Bruce Chapman to reconfirm working on a street maintenance agreement only. Other details are to be worked out between homeowners and VA. 10119 SNOW STORAGE LAND GREGILARRY G.: Immediately pursue purchase from VA Initial discussion between TOV and VA re: possible future land exchanges PURCHASE of current snow storage site, as well as another 10 acres have occurred. adjacent to the west. 10/26 WATER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT TOM M.: Prepare supporting ordinance. REVIEW REGULATIONSINWCCOG 11/09 DRAFT RESOLUTION RE: TOM M.: Prepare resolution. Tom M. to work with Roger Tilkemeier and VA to prepare supportive draft RANGELAND DOCUMENTIBRUCE resolution. BABBITT 12107 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PEGGY: Linda Powers, State Representative from SPECIAL DISTRICTS Gunnison, is considering expanded wording from county- (request: Steinberg) wide to regional county districts re: state-wide half cent transportation tax. Follow-up in writing. 12/07 REFERENDUM SUBMITTAL TOM M.: Supply detail re: immediate disclosure PROCESS requirements for referendum petitioners. (request: Johnston) VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY Q, 9994 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the December 7, 1993, and December 21, 1993, Vail Town Council Evening Meetings. 3. Ordinance No. 1, Series, of 1994, first reading, an ordinance establishing the value per acre of land to be used id the formula to calculate the cash to paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 17.17.020 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. 4. Resolution, No. 1, Series of 1994, a resolution designating a public place within the Town of Vail for the posting of notice.fgr public. meetings of the Vait Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, Design Aeview Board, and other boards, commissions, and authorities of the Town of Vail. 5. Resolution No. 2, Series of 1994, a resolution granting approval for the issuance of a permit to Vail Valley Consolidated Water District to proceed with installing two 12" water mains in the vicinity of . Dowd Junction and I-70. 6. Presentation Re: Lindholm Land Exchange Proposal and Public Input. 7. Adjournment. . NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: , • • ~ • ~ • • THE. NEXT_ PAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1%11!94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL,REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1%18%94, BEGINNING AT 2:00~'P.iM. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING. VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY; 1/18/94, BEGINNING At 7:30 PM. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ~ • ~ • • • • C:IAGENDA.TC VAIL TOWN COUNCIL EVENING MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 4„ 1994 6:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS EXPANDED AGENDA 6:30 P.M. 1. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. 6:35 P.M. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the December 7, 1993, and December 21, 1993, Vail Town Council Evening Meetings. 6:40 P.M. 3. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1994, ~ first reading, an ordinance Tom Moorhead establishing the value per acre of land to be used in the formula Jim Curnutte to calculate the cash to paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 17.17.020 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. Action Reauested of Council: Consider raising value per acre of land to be used in the formula to calculate the cash to be paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 17.17.020. Backaround Rationale: This value shall be set annually by the Council on an acre basis with recommendations from the School District. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1994, on first reading. 6:45 P.M. 4. Resolution No. 1, Series of 1994, a resolution designating a public Tom Moorhead place within the Town of Vail for the posting of notice for public meetings of the Vail Town Council, Planning and Environmental Commission, Design Review Board, and other boards, commissions, and authorities of the Town of Vail. Action Reauested of Council: Approve/deny/modify Resolution No. 1, Series of 1994. Backaround Rationale: This annual resolution is required pursuant to Town Charter and State law. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 1, Series of 1994. 6:50 P.M. 5. Resolution No. 2, Series of 1994, a resolution granting approval for Greg Hall the issuance of a permit to Vail Valley Consolidated Water District Tom Moorhead to proceed with installing two 12" water mains in the vicinity of Dowd Junction and I-70. Action Reauested of Council: Consider issuing permit for a street cut to proceed installing two (2) 12" water mains in the vicinity of Dowd Junction and I-70. Backaround Rationale: Installation of the water mains is in the Town's best interest as discussed at the Council meeting on December 21, 1993. 1 Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2, Series of 1994. 6:55 P.M. 6. Presentation re: Lindholm Land Exchange Proposal and Public Magnus Lindholm input. Bill Post Action Reauested of Council: Listen to presentation and public input. Background Rationale: Mr. Lindholm is seeking support from communities adjacent to proposed land swap sites. Please review enclosed article from the 1221/93 issue of the Vail Daily for a report on the meeting Mr. Lindholm had with the Avon Town Council. 9:55 P.M. 7. Adjournment. NOTE UPCOMING MEETING START TIMES BELOW: . • • • • • • • THE NEXT VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/11/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR WORK SESSION WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 2:00 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. THE FOLLOWING VAIL TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR EVENING MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY, 1/18/94, BEGINNING AT 7:30 P.M. IN TOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • • • • • • • C:WGENDA.TCE 2 ~ MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 7, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Paul Johnston Sybill Navas Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Jan Strauch TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney Pam Brandmeyer, Assistant to the Town Manager Holly McCutcheon, Town Clerk The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Kent Rose welcomed new Council members, Paul Johnston, Sybill Navas, and Jan Strauch, and welcomed Peggy Osterfoss back as Mayor. He also welcomed new Town Manager, Bob McLaurin. Mr. Rose then presented specially designed T-shirts reading, "SOS -Save Open Space -Defend Davos;' to Council. Porter Wharton advised that Bob Armour, Kent Rose, and he comprised the Executive Committee of the "Save Open Save -Defend Davos" group. Mr. Wharton presented a check to Council in the amount of $500.00, profits realized from the sale of 100 of the above referenced T-shirts, to be used for the purchase of open space. Mayor Osterfoss thanked the group and stated she could not recall when a group of citizens had ever presented TOV with a check, and she hoped it signified what could be more public/private partnership efforts. She briefly discussed the recent successful passage of the Amendment One modification, and expressed appreciation for the support of that ballot issue. As a result of the passage of that ballot issue, she indicated a substantial increase in real estate transfer tax (RETT) funds over last year was anticipated. It was noted those funds were used for purchase of open space, as well as maintenance of existing parks and recreation trails. She said it appeared there would also be some sales tax increase, and TOV would not need to go back to the voters to ask how those funds could specifically be used. She felt passage of~the Amendment One modification was a tremendous show of trust and confidence on the part of the community. Merv Lapin moved to accept the $500.00 contribution from the Defend Davos group, and that it be added to TOV's RETT fund to be earmarked for acquisition of open space. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. After brief discussion, a vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 2 was approval of the Minutes of the November 2,1993, November 9,1993, and November 16, 1993 Evening Meetings. Merv Lapin moved to approve the minutes of November 2, 9, and 16, 1993, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 3 was a request for final approval and adoption of the Town of Vail Cemetery Management and Master Plan for the Town of Vail Cemetery to be constructed in the upper bench of Donovan Park located generally southeast of the Matterhorn neighborhood and west of the Glen Lyon neighborhood. The applicant was the Town of Vail. Andy Knudtsen advised that Sherry Dorward, Vice President of Alpine International had been the lead consultant who had coordinated two other firms, The Sloane Consulting Group, cemetery management specialists, and HEPY, a cemetery design consultant. Andy noted the site selection process for this project began in 1989. The Donovan Park site had been recommended as the best site according to a number of criteria. Ms. Dorward advised that their team had been selected in October, 1992, to begin development of a Master Plan for a cemetery on that site. The mission of the team was to develop a physical plan for the layout of the cemetery,,recommend capacity of the cemetery, types of burial places, and a way it could be feasibly managed and paid for. After a number of interviews with Council, other officials in Town, and with religious leaders in the Valley, The Sloane Consulting Group recommended that the cemetery be managed by the Cemetery District. Ms. Dorward noted it had been running on a tight budget for years, but that it was a feasible management structure. She explained that at the time the first draft of the management report came out, it was possible to fund the cemetery via the District through a one time mill levy assessment. Amendment One made that difficult, but it still seemed that was the best source of funding. Funding through bond issues was rejected, not only because of the long term interest costs, but also because, under the terms of Amendment One and the law pertaining to Cemetery Districts, the bond indebtedness could not be incurred. She further noted the mill levy tax had not passed in the November, 1993, election, but the District remained The Sloane Consulting Group's preference for the management of the cemetery. This issue had been discussed with County officials and Council, and it seemed the District made the most sense because TOV did not want to 1 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 1??7/93 be in the business of running the day to day operations of the cemetery. Fiscal projections showed that the cemetery could be self supporting for its operating expenses, but not for the initial capital investment. A memo from the Community Development Department (CDD) to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) dated November 8,1993, detailed the Project Description including the Master Plan and Management Proposal, the Review Process, and Conclusion,. The project's Mission Statement and Guiding Principles, drawings and photos of the site character details, and photos of various types of cemetery characteristics were on display throughout Ms. ~ Dorward's presentation. She discussed the physical plan of the cemetery, emphasizing that plan came out of a number of conversations and meetings with neighbors and citizens which began in October, 1992. The Master Plan -Town of Vail Municipal Cemetery Final Report, October 7,1993, was summarized. It covered the purpose of the project, the methodology of the planning/design process, community involvement and public input, a summary of findings and recommendations concerning management, operational policies, design guidelines, phasing and initial capital costs, implementation, asummary of demographic characteristics of the Eagle Valley Area, management alternatives, pricing, fiscal issues, the conceptual design plan including a description of the site, design determining factors, development components of the initial phase, capacity and phasing, a report on initial capital costs and funding sources, environmental considerations, and next steps for implementation. There was discussion regarding percentages of the cemetery allocated 'to different uses and the cemetery inventory. Andy Knudtsen noted the total area of the Vail Cemetery, proposed to be located at the upper bench of Donovan Park, was approximately 39 acres. Of that, the open meadow near Matterhorn Circle was 9.5 acres. The cemetery would use approximately 2 acres of that for burial and memorial space and access. Those 2 acres would accommodate all of the proposed improvements which were expected to provide cemetery space over the next one hundred years. Ms. Dorward summarized the costs of each of the major components. She said they had estimated almost $470,000. for building this cemetery, plus design and engineering fees and contingency effecting a total estimated cost of $600,245. It was noted that that was the amount the bond issue would have generated if that ballot issue had passed. It was noted if the cemetery was not built until 1995, an inflation factor of 5% per year needed to be factored in, bring the total estimated cost to $660,270. Merv Lapin inquired about the present funding situation, and what the next steps were. Andy ICnudtsen advised he had not heard back from the District. He said they were in the red and they had nine spaces left in their inventory in Minturn. Their current mill levy revenue would not cover their costs since they had updated and increased their hourly fees. Merv Lapin moved that the Master Plan for the Town of Vail Municipal Cemetery be approved, with a second from Paul Johnston. Before a vote was taken, Andy ICnudtsen pointed out that in the November 8, 1993, memo to the PEC from the CDD, the public process was addressed, and he emphasized how closely staff had worked with the neighborhood. Additionally, he noted the PEC had recommended approval of this Master Plan, 5-2. One person had voted in opposition because of site selection, and the other was opposed based on a philosophical opinion about a cemetery as a use of land. He said there was one modification to the Master Plan that was made at the PEC hearing and that was that the term used in the report "entry monuments" be changed to "entry features." The PEC recommended a review of the trend between below grade burial and crypts/ niches as the cemetery was developed. They also recommended that The Sloane Consulting Group review headstone height. Jan Strauch had questions about the procedure of proposing this and voting on it, and what the next step was. Mayor Osterfoss advised that after the motion on the floor had been acted on, the next steps could be discussed. She said basically improvements were being made to the proposed Master Plan which addressed the design, cost, and management recommendations. Jan stated he felt the presentation made was not a fair representation of what the site looked like. He said it was a heavily wooded area, and felt the cemetery would be a very visible, high impact use for a large part of the year. He felt it would be undesirable to neighbors. Secondly, he felt this was an inappropriate use of open space. He was not certain how much recreational use the area had now, but he hoped at some point it would be used more for recreation. Thirdly, he felt there was a great press for land in this community and he was uncertain a cemetery was even needed here. He stated he would not vote to approve this Master Plan. Tom Steinberg indicated he disagreed with Jan Strauch. Tom felt the cemclC~y would not be visible from the neighborhood or the highway or nearby roads. He noted all of this had been discussed in depth with the neighbors, and to his knowledge, most all of the neighbors were satisfied. He felt the one way to guarantee that this land would stay open space forever was to make it a cemetery. Further, he noted the need for this cemetery, as Minturn was out of space. He felt, overall, the presented design was beautiful and would be an asset to that community. He felt if the cemetery was not approved, it would be regretted forever. 2 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 1?J7/93 Andy I<nudtsen noted in the summary of the public process, there had been akick-off meeting on October 27 and 28, 1993. He said initially the majority of the Matterhorn community was in opposition to a cemetery in the neighborhood. Ms. Dorward and he had spent time with them individually, walking the site, and staff listened to what they wanted. He noted those people were not present at this meeting because their concerns had been met. He felt there had been a good public process to receive input as to what was wanted. Diana Donovan expressed opposition to the project. She agreed with Jan Strauch in that this was a bad use of space. She was against blocking up the whole 39 acres for a cemetery. She did not believe the majority of Vail residents or guests would go to a cemetery for a hike. She felt that no one was present tonight because they assumed since the ballot issue had not passed in the election, that the community was saying no to a cemetery in Vail. Mike Phillips was in favor of the cemetery, but also questioned why 39 acres were designated when only 2 acres were needed. Paul Johnston was in favor of the project. Sybill Navas felt the cemetery was important for the community, but she felt the whole 39 acres would be used, and felt the whole area would feel like a cemetery. She found it difficult to think that the rest of it would be used for anything else. She asked for clarification as to what the election results meant; were the election results saying that the community did not want a cemetery, or that they just did not want to pay for it. She did not understand why some people would vote for one part of the ballot issue and not the other. Ms. Dorward felt the only way to know what the election results meant was to ask people. Her suspicion was that the issue received practically no publicity and there were no informational campaigns. The fact that the Cemetery District had been re-named the Eagle-Gore Cemetery District to reflect that it served the whole upper Valley had not even been used in the wording of the ballot question because that formal step had not been taken in time to be part of the ballot question, so the fact that the ballot question referred to the Minturn Cemetery District had probably mislead voters. Ms. Dorward also responded to Sybill's question regarding the 39 acres, stating that much of the area was very steep and was above the open area to be used for the cemetery. Kristan Pritz advised that,the Master Plan for parks and open space included no specific designation for that land not being used for the cemetery, but the concept was to keep that land open. She felt if the cemetery was going to be brought down to the lower area, closer to the houses there, that an amendment to the plan would be required, because that was not what the Master Plan showed at this time. Council wanted the boundaries clarified in the Master Plan. Mayor Osterfoss asked that the intention that there would be no foreseeable use of the land on the lower eastern portion and south of the road be added to the Master Plan. ICristan Pritz advised that an additional paragraph could be added to indicate that the Master Plan did not allow burial sites in the lower portion. Andy Knudtsen indicated that the site plan shown on page 17 of the Master Plan did show a boundary drawn around the improvement which included in ground burial, crypts and niches, and the turn-around, and it was a very definite identification of the devel~~,„gent area. Any expansion of this area would require a formal amendment to the Master Plan. Sybill Navas said she could not imagine anyone playing softball right next to a cemetery. Ms. Dorward noted the site was too steep for any active recreational development, even in the meadow. It was best for hiking, sledding, snowshoeing, passive individual types of activities. She felt the cemetery improvements were confined enough to one space that the majority of the site was still available for all of those uses. She said she would be surprised if people found it repugnant to hike there; there would be a series of trails leading up to a meditation space at the top. It was a matter of personal preference. Merv Lapin called the question. Tom Steinberg noted several people had mentioned they did not want a cemetery in Vail, implying it was ghoulish. He asked if people were aware there was already a private cemetery in this Valley. Mayor Osterfoss advised, that technically, at this point, a vote was needed on whether to call the question. Tom Moorhead advised that was correct: Merv Lapin moved to call the question with a second from Paul Johnston. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Osterfoss indicated she would have allowed further discussion, but the question had been called. Merv Lapin amended his original motion to include additional wording in the Master Plan to clarify boundaries for the cemetery. Paul Johnston accepted the amended motion he had seconded. A vote was then taken and the motion passed, 6-1, Jan Strauch opposed. Diana Donovan noted the cemetery was part of Donovan Park which had been named to honor her husband. She asked that Donovan Park be retained in the name of the cemetery. Kristan Pritz asked Council if they were interested in proceeding with the staff meeting with the 3 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 1?/7/93 Cemetery Task Force to come up with financial alternatives with respect to building the cemetery. Tom Steinberg encouraged them to proceed, and if it was necessary to go back to another vote, then the facts of the issue could be better presented to the voters. Jim Shearer agreed. Merv Lapin asked if it would be worthwhile to wait until there was another vote before any further work was done. Kristan said they would not want to get into the position of promoting the project. She felt discussion should be pursued with the District and the Task Force as to what they might want to do and bring that information back to Council. Merv inquired what the attitude of the private sector toward taking the cemetery over might be. Since it had been agreed that the Master Plan was valid; ' it seemed that exploring all financial opportunities to get it built was the next step. Mayor Osterfoss stated there seemed to be a high level of consensus, with the exception of jan Strauch, that staff should move ahead and come back in the short run with some suggestions as to how to proceed. She also felt Diana Donovan's suggested concerning retaining Donovan Park as part of the cemetery name was appropriate. Item No. 4 was Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.24.065 and 18.26.045, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for exterior alterations or modifications of buildings in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts; and providing details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Shelly Mello stated this ordinance proposed a series of clarifications for the exterior alteration Section of Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II. She indicated there were a number of changes proposed which made the Code more explanatory. She highlighted some of the proposed changes which included changing the application dates for the bi-annual submittal, as well as including exterior dining decks and roof line modifications in the exterior alteration process. The remaining changes served to further detail the application materials and the review criteria. Kristan Pritz stated the staff would also like to establish the requirement of payment of one fee only for dining decks. Mayor Osterfoss suggested information about the one fee be spelled out in the ordinance, and Tom Moorhead recommended including that in the ordinance. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1993, on first reading, with the addition of language to specify that only one fee would be charged for exterior dining decks. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Merv Lapin asked if staff had discussed these changes with any of the architects or people who would be affected by them. Kristan Pritz said there had been general discussions concerning this, but no specific meetings had been held. Merv suggested some of the local architects be contacted for their input on these changes before second reading. Kristan indicated this would be done. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 5 was Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance rezoning 7.710 acres from Agricultural and Open Space, Section 18.32 to Low Density Multi-Family, Section 18.161ocated between Tract C, Block 2, Vail Potato Patch and Parcel B. The applicant was Town of Vail/Nail Housing Authority. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Andy Knudtsen noted, at this time, the Housing Authority was trying to work out the details of this proposal and requested this item be tabled until February 1, 1994. Merv Lapin moved to table Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1993, first reading, until February 1, 1994, with a second from Jim Shearer. Before a vote was taken, Tom Steinberg asked if Council consensus could be reached as to whether this item should be withdrawn altogether, but Andy indicated he was not sure the Housing Authority wanted to withdraw this item and he did not feel that decision could be made without them at this time. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No 6. was Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.04.170 and Section 18.58.020(C) -fences, hedges, walls and screening, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail; and providing details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Shelly Mello indicated the proposed change addressed height definition and would not modify the building height allowance, but would serve to clarify this section of the Code. The change to the wall height section of the Code was proposed in order to correct the height limit for walls in the front setback. The memo to the PEC dated May 24, 1993, and minutes which detail the discussions regarding the proposed change to the Code were available for review. This proposal was approved by the PEC by a vote of 6-0. Tom Steinberg moved to approve Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1993, on first reading, with a second from Merv Lapin. After discussion clarifying the intent of Section 18.04.170 of the ordinance by the addition of "vertical" to clarify the definition of height, a vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 7 was Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance making Supplemental Appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, The Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Police Confiscation Fund, Heavy Equipment fund, West Vail Debt Service Fund, and Vail Marketing Fund of the 1993 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1993, on first reading, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. 4 Vail Town Counci] Evening Meeting Minutes 12/7/93 Item No. 8 was Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1993, first reading, an ordinance rezoning Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family Residential zone districts. The applicant was Leo Payne. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. As the applicant was not yet present, Council moved on to discussion of agenda item No. 9. Item No. 9 was Resolution No. 16, Series of 1993, a resolution to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Vail and the Eagle, State of Colorado, for Animal Control Services. Tom Moorhead noted TOV has had a defacto agreement with Eagle County Animal Control, and this resolution proposed formalizing the agreement to have the County Animal Control officers administer and enforce animal control services for and within the Town of Vail.. He outlined the details of the proposed Agreement, including the various costs that would be incurred by TOV. He advised that Judge Buck Allen, Tom Sheeley of the Police Department, the Finance Department, and he had reviewed the final Agreement. Bob Slagle, Eagle County Animal Control Officer, further discussed the Agreement details including territory covered, scope of services, level of service, official status, equipment, personnel, liability, «~,~~ination, general provisions, and miscellaneous provisions. Mr. Slagle explained the total annual cost to TOV of $25,723.82 in depth. Per the Agreement, TOV would agree to pay the County the sum of $2,143.65 per month. After discussion about service provisions and service reporting methods, Paul Johnston moved to approve Resolution No. 19, Series of 1993, a resolution to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Vail and the Eagle, State of Colorado, for Animal Control Services, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. At this time, Craig Snowdon, representing Leo Payne, arrived, 'and Council commenced discussion of agenda item No. 8. Kristan Pritz recalled that Council had had some discussion regarding this item earlier this date during Work Session, during which there had been a site visit to the residence at 381 Beaver Dam Circle. She reviewed details from the Community Development Department (CDD) memo dated November 22, 1993, to the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) detailing the applicant's proposal to rezone Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd filing from the Primary/Secondary zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential and Single Family zone district. The proposal also requested a minor subdivision for the purpose of subdividing the existing lot into two lots. She said the applicant proposed to take the northern portion of the Lot and maintain it as a Primary/Secondary Lot, to be called Lot 1-A, consisting of two units. On the southern portion of the Lot which would be created, to be called Lot 1-B, one single family residence was proposed. That would result in a net increase of one dwelling unit on the property. ICristan noted a 10-foot wide road maintenance easement along the front property line of the two new lots, a 30-foot wide drainage easement through Lot 1-B in the location of an existing drainage way, and an approximate 11,860 square foot open space and wetlands easement on the eastern half of Lot 1-A were proposed. ICristan also reviewed previous similar subdivision requests, noting except for one of those, they were different from the request under discussion in the sense that most of them did not have a unit increase. She briefly reviewed the zoning analysis information supplied in the memo. She discussed the evaluation of the zone change request including suitability of the proposed zoning. She said staff believed the proposed zoning was compatible with low density residential development which was how the Land Use Plan designated this area. She said staff also believed single family zoning was very compatible in that neighborhood and that single family units were a permitted use in Primary/Secondary zoning, as well as Single Family zoning. According to the memo, staff felt a convenient, workable relationship with the Land Use Plan was presented with the proposal and no major problems were foreseen. It was noted the two units currently allowed on the property could propose to be separated. There was a possibility that the applicant could obtain approval from the Design Review Board (DRB) to actually separate the primary unit from the secondary unit, but that physical hardship on the site had to be proven. The memo stated that the CDD felt that since the proposed rezoning met the development standards for the proposed zone districts to be created on the lot, as well as complying with the intent and purpose section of the subdivision regulations, the proposal did provide for the growth of an orderly viable community and created no negative impacts or undesirable precedents for the community. Staff felt the rezoning complied-with the Land Use Plan and policy statements from the Land Use Plan concerning controlling growth, environmental issues, and residential growth were noted. Kristan discussed three key areas reviewed as part of the minor subdivision request including Lot Area, Frontage, and Site Dimensions. She said the second set of criteria considered were outlined in Section 17.16.110 of the Vail Subdivision Regulations, all of which staff felt had been met by the project. She focused on one of those regulations concerning many of the environmental issues related to the project. She advised staff had asked the applicant to provide an environmental impact report. Dames and Moore had been hired to prepare that study, and it was found there were two wetland areas on the property. The applicant had proposed to protect the wetland areas by providing the 30-foot wide drainage easement and a wetlands and open space easement which would also protect the existing stand of trees located on the eastern half of Lot 1-A. ICristan advised staff recommended approval of the proposed rezoning and resubdivision of Lot'1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing from the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district to the Primary/Secondary Residential zone district and the Single Family Residential zone district with six conditions of approval including that the resubdivision plat not be signed by the Town and recorded until such time that the existing residence on the lot was demolished; that all aspects of development 5 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 12/7/93 on each lot, including at-grade patios and terraces and building roof overhangs, be contained within platted building envelopes; that the wetland and open space easement would be expanded to abut the eastern building envelope line of Lot 1-A and no construction or site disturbance would occur in that easement area; that the cluster of large evergreen trees located in front of the existing residence would not be removed or damaged as a result of construction on either of the newly created lots; that the applicant's surveyor would provide staff with a topographic survey verifying that each of the proposed lots met the minimum buildable lot area requirements in the Primazy/Secondazy Residential and Single Family Residential zone districts; and that approval of the minor subdivision would be conditioned upon Council approval of the zone change request. Kristan noted that condition #5, regarding verifying the minimum buildable lot area requirements had already been satisfied. She advised the PEC made minor changes to those conditions of approval which were summarized on CDD's memo to Council dated December 7,1993. The PEC changed the condition related to the wetlands to indicate that the open space and wetlands easement could stay as shown on the plat, however, no site disturbance or tree removal could occur in the area between the Lot 1-A eastern building envelope line and the western line of the open space and wetlands area. It was noted the proposal was approved by the PEC on November 22, 1993, by a 43 vote, Diana Donovan, Dalton Williams, and Kathy Langenwalter opposed. Kristan stated she felt the PEC had concerns about impact on the character of the neighborhood and that the PEC felt a better solution was to allow one single family unit on Lot 1-A with a caretaker restricted permanently for employee housing and one single family unit on Lot 1-B and that the PEC preferred not to see any increase in GRFA. Minutes of the November 22, 1993, PEC meeting were supplied. Individual letters of opposition had been received from Dick Pownall and Mary Pownall, Lorraine N. and Harley G. Higbie, Jr., and Charlie and Patti Langmaid. A form letter from a number of other persons reading, "Ladies and Gentlemen, You have before you today a request for a subdivision of Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village Third Filing also known as 381 Beaver Dam Circle. The purpose of this letter is to inform the Planning Commission that any decision that will allow additional dwelling units in the Town of Vail or that will increase the square footage allowed under the existing ordinances is unacceptable. The following signatures on this letter demonstrate that a number of people who are either full or part time residents of the Town of Vail are not in favor of this proposal and ask that you respond to the wishes of the people and reject this request; `had also been received. Craig Snowdon of Snowdon and Hopkins Architects represented the applicant. A site drawing was displayed. Mr. Snowdon advised the drawing was a color rendition of the Lot in question, colored in such a way so the various proposed zones of the property were evident. Mr. Snowdon noted Mr. Payne and his family had owned this property since 1972, adding that 1972 was a time prior to most zoning ordinances adopted by the Town. He questioned whether the present zoning was appropriate zoning when originally established. He noted that Primary/Secondary zoning, which this Lot was, came into existence in 1977. The GRFA placed on this property was created in 1980, and had been amended several times since then. Mr. Snowdon felt all of these issues had affected this property, which he emphasized had stayed in single ownership since 1972. The owners had adjusted to limitations and restrictions placed on them throughout their ownership of the property. As mentioned, the owner was planning on maintaining the northern portion, Lot 1-A, for himself and his family. Mr. Snowdon said the proposal had been reviewed three times by staff and the PEC and had gone through dramatic changes since the first presentation made in August, 1993. He said the PEC did approve this and staff recommended approval. He discussed the proposal at length. He explained by creating a Single Family zone for the proposed newly created Lot, that allowed the applicant to create a smaller lot which then allowed the applicant to move property lines and building envelopes and get those envelopes out of the existing tree growth. He noted the applicant had the capability within the 37,770 square feet of lot area to create two Primary/Secondary lots. He stated that the original lot of 37,770 would by this proposal be designating 15,550 square feet to other uses besides Mr. Payne's via various easements and open areas. He felt the established envelopes proposed on the property insured that a majority of the existing tree growth would stay in place. He said the GRFA was being limited strictly to the 425 square foot credit for the new unit. He said the owner was complying with all Single Family Residential and Primary/Secondary zone regulations. The majority of construction would stay within what were already the disturbed areas of the property. He felt another minor benefit was that with the elimination of the existing residence, the TOV would lose two wood burning fireplaces and gain gas fireplaces. Discussion followed concerning other lots that could be subdivided. Mr. Snowdon felt Council, with this pazticulaz proposal, needed to look at its merits, not the possibility of another applicant collecting large lots and subdividing. He did not feel that was the situation with this proposal. Public input included comments in opposition to the proposed project from Don Byers, who felt Council should recognize there were constraints on that site and they should allow Mr. Payne to build a Primazy/Secondary improvement with existing zoning allowing separation of the two proposed buildings to protect the trees and take care of the drainage problem. Kristan Pritz clarified if the existing zoning was kept, the applicant would not get the additional unit they wanted. Merv Lapin asked if it was possible under what was being proposed if the applicant could come back and ask for another caretaker unit on Lot 1-B and call it employee housing. Kristan advised that that was a possibility, but that would require a conditional use approval from the PEC. It was established this proposal could create the potential for there being five units on the two lots. fj Vail Town CommcII Evening Meeting Minutes 12/7/99 Rohn Robbins, attorney with Dunn, Abplanalp and Christensen representing Mr. and Mrs. David Ransberg, owners of Lot 5. Mr. Robbins did not agree that this proposal would not create negative impacts or undesirable precedent for the community. He noted he had attended the PEC's hearings on this proposal and noted one of the developers in the community stood up and indicated if Mr. Payne was allowed this proposal, he would make a similar proposal, and the same developer felt every other developer in the Valley would. Mr. Robbins noted in the history of the Valley a similar proposal had been granted with increased density. The same effort had been attempted on Lot 4 in 1988, and had been voted down. Having attended the PEC meetings, he said of the four positive PEC votes, he believed he had counted two voters who seemed uncomfortable with the proposal, but seemed constrained by the ordinance to do so. Mr. Robbins said the language of Section 17.04.010 of the Vail Municipal Code was written in a discretionary manner. He said neither the PEC nor Council were obliged to approve this sort of proposal. ' He felt the key issue was language cited in 17.040.010 dealing with Subdivision Regulations requiring subdivisions to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community. He did not see what was gained by this proposal other than one landowner would profit. T'he other benefits being proposed by the proponents of the proposal included the fact that certain trees would be saved. He found it difficult to believe with the ethic of this Valley that those trees would be sacrificed anyway. That would have to be approved by the DRB, and he doubted they would approve that. Mr. Robbins believed there was a prescriptive easement currently running through that property. If TOV had been encroaching on that land for 22 years, a prescriptive easement, in his estimation, existed. He raised another theoretical point that this proposal was more restrictive than what was currently permissible. He felt that was true theoretically, but realistically he felt the DRB would not approve the sort of uses that might otherwise be approved. He noted in order to encroach on the wetlands, the applicant would have to apply for a 404 permit with Army Corps of Engineers, and he doubted if that would be approved. In sum, he felt there was no public benefit of this proposal as required under the language of the Municipal Code regarding the zoning ordinances. Before Council comments, there was additional public input in opposition to this proposal from Tim Tyler, Tim Driscoll, and Nancy Byers. Mr. Driscoll felt the PEC's 43 vote to approve this proposal showed their ambivalence on this issue. He felt when the founders of Vail subdivided and platted the lot, it was their intent to keep it as one lot, not two. Mrs. Byers stated that she believed that Council was responsible to uphold the original covenants, ordinances, and zoning restrictions on which the Town was founded. She said they all bought and built on their properties assuming the integrity of their neighborhood would be maintained, and once the properties started being divided and extra density added, the neighborhood character changed. Merv Lapin asked if there were covenants on the property that would prohibit the proposed project. Don Byers said the covenants were dated March, 1963, and were signed in June, 1963, by Pete Seibert and specifically said two apartments per lot. Merv noted TOV was not party to the covenants so that if action was taken, it would be between the private parties, it would not involve TOV. Paul Johnston noted neither the ordinance title nor Section 2 of it referred to the requested minor subdivision. Kristan Pritz advised the minor subdivision was already approved by the PEC, conditioned upon the rezoning being approved by Council. Tom Moorhead noted he was made aware that an appeal of the PEC decision in favor of rezoning and resubdividing Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd filing had been filed by the Byers. He referred to Minor Subdivision procedure which provided for an appeal of the PEC's decision by the Town Council. He said that Section 17.16.190 dealt with right to appeal, and he could find no provision within the minor or major subdivision sections that provided for appeals by individuals, only provisions for appeal by Council. The other provisions that dealt with appeal by adjacent property owners dealt with the SDD process and conditional uses. He stated he would continue to research and would be willing to review anything the Byers had that would indicate there was a right to appeal this. There was further discussion and clarification about the appeal process. Tom Moorhead said the action of the PEC as it pertained to the minor subdivision was final, but it was conditioned upon approval of the ordinance. Tom Steinberg said, since the neighbors were not able to call up this issue, he wanted the record to reflect that he wanted Council to call this up should the ordinance be passed. Mayor Osterfoss suggested waiting to deal with appeal issues until the disposition of the rezoning request was determined. Council comment commenced. Merv Lapin felt that the opinion that only 281ots would be affected was incorrect. He felt the Beaver Dam Road neighborhood would be severely impacted by this proposal. He also felt moving and adding lot lines did change a neighborhood and was not in the spirit of zoning, because people built houses depending on views and how neighbors sited their lots. Already existing houses could be negatively affected. Merv asked Tom Moorhead if precedence was or was not an issue in this type of situation. Tom Moorhead felt any actions or decisions that were made in the past provided direction. In most instances, prior decisions could be referred to for guidance. For historical purposes, he felt prior decisions should be looked at as far as what the community direction had been and whether or not that fit within the guidelines and overall plan presently under consideration. Merv did not feel that this proposal met criteria under the Land Use Plan. 7 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 12/7/93 Jim Shearer felt Mr. Payne was responsible in his approach, but Jim was not in favor of the proposal for many of the same reasons Merv cited. Precedence or not, he felt over a period of time the entire hillside would be divided and resubdivided again and again due to individual financial gain goals. He felt the rezoning would be a negative impact on the character of the neighborhood. He felt GRFA problems were part of the negative aspects of this proposal. Further, he said he was inclined to place weight on the neighborhood's opinion, and there was a great deal of opposition. He was not in favor of increasing the density in this neighborhood. He was opposed to the proposal. Jan Strauch agreed that the intent of the original development was not to force a lot of houses into every possible 15,000 square feet of land, and the only benefit he saw to this proposal was to the owner. He saw no positive impact to the community or the neighborhood and it was strategically against what he felt should be provided in incentives for people to downsize what people were building on their properties. He noted there were many restrictions on the Lot, i.e., trees, wetlands, drainage. He was opposed to the proposal. Paul Johnston supported the minority position of the PEC. He felt the Lot should be left the way it was now. Sybill Navas was opposed to the rezoning and saw no benefits to the community. She also observed the neighborhood opposition to the proposal. She advised she had spoken with some of the PEC members who had voted in favor of the rezoning, but felt they were qualifying their votes because they felt compelled by the ordinances. She did not feel they were committed in theory to the proposal. She indicated she would vote no. Tom Steinberg disagreed that the rezoning would be consistent with the surrounding and immediate neighborhoods. He also disagreed that it would be a benefit to the community. He felt the required 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers would never be allowed to go through because this Council would object strenuously to that. He felt the benefits TOV was being told it was to receive from this proposal were not things the applicant had control to give away. He felt the original planners were intelligent developers who looked at that Lot and felt it needed to be a big lot. He felt they were right and asked why TOV should look back 30 years and change that for one person's private gain. He was opposed. Mayor Osterfoss felt although rezoning was a theoretical possibility based on the size of this lot, this specific proposal did not address Land Use Plan criteria B referencing convenient workable relationships with land uses consistent with municipal objects nor did it address item D, compliance with Vail Land Use Plan. She felt it failed to meet these criteria based on adding additional units and additional GRFA. She agreed with Paul's comments and with the minority position of the PEC. She also did not feel there was benefit to the community. Merv Lapin moved to deny Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1993, on first reading because it did not meet Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of the Land Use Plan Goals, the Subdivision Regulations Purpose under 17.04.010, and under zoning criteria °did not meet items B and D. Tom Steinberg seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. ° Merv Lapin further moved that staff have the PEC look into ways to avoid having these types of proposals presented again. There was no second to this motion. He felt the minimum building lot sizes should be increased on Single Family lots from 12,500 to 17,500 and 15,000 to 20,000 on a Primary/Secondary. He said those numbers were meant only as guides, but he wanted the PEC to look at this or other methods. Mayor Osterfoss asked Merv if he anticipated this being done as part of the review of the Land Use Plan planned for the next year. He said he would like to see this back to Council by February 15, 1993. ICristan Pritz felt staff needed to discuss possibilities with Tom Moorhead, and then work with the PEC. Merv agreed to that, but felt there was a necessity for speed with this issue. Kristan wanted the PEC and Council to have a joint Work Session to discuss possible solutions. She advised staff would have notice published to advise the public, but initially a Work Session in February would be preferred. Tom Steinberg felt an alternative to that was to put a moratorium on any lot subdivision until such time as the Land Use Plan had been thoroughly reviewed and passed. Merv stated he was reluctant to use a moratorium process. Mayor Osterfoss felt that the idea described by Kristan was a helpful starting point to define what the concerns were and discuss different approaches. Tom Moorhead recommended tabling of the Byers' appeal as a technicality. Merv Lapin moved to table the Byer's appeal of the subdivision until December 21, 1993, with a second from Jim Shearer. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 10 was a sign variance request from Pineridge Townhouses. Jim Curnutte discussed the CDD memo to Council dated December 7, 1993, summarizing DRB action on this request. He said the DRB recommended approval of the request by a vote of 5-0, with two conditions of approval. Jim explained that the requested signs were not permitted subdivision entrance signs due to the zoning on the property. However, staff felt this was a hardship to the applicant. After brief g Vai] Town Counci] Evening Meeting Minutes 12/7/93 discussion, Merv Lapin moved to approve the Pineridge Townhouses sign variance on staff recommendation as detailed in the CDD memo to Council dated December 7, 1993, memo, with a second from Paul Johnston. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor Arir;ST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto C:IMINSDEC7.93 9 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 12/'7/93 ~S MINUTES VAIL TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 21, 1993 7:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Vail Town Council was held on Tuesday, December 21,1993, in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Merv Lapin. As the meeting was called to order, Mayor Osterfoss, Jim Shearer, and Jan Strauch were not yet present. They each arrived moments later. MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor Merv Lapin, Mayor Pro-Tem Paul Johnston Sybill Navas Jim Shearer Tom Steinberg Jan Strauch TOWN OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager Tom Moorhead, Town Attorney The first item on the agenda was Citizen Participation. Merv Lapin, as a citizen, asked Joe Macy about the status of signs at the Golden Peak building which did not appear to be in compliance. Merv was advised the matter had been taken care of. Item No. 2 on the agenda was a Consent Agenda consisting of two items: A. Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.04.170 and Section 18.58.020(C) -fences, hedges, walls and screening, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail; and providing details in regard thereto. B. Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance making Supplemental Appropriations from the Town of Vail General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, The Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund, Police Confiscation Fund, Heavy Equipment fund, West Vail Debt Service Fund, and Vail Marketing Fund of the 1993 Budget and the Financial Plan for the Town of Vail, Colorado; and authorizing the expenditures of said appropriations as set forth herein; and setting forth details in regard thereto. Merv Lapin read the titles in full. Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1993, was removed from the Consent Agenda for further discussion concerning additional detail Merv had requested from Steve Thompson. Merv Lapin moved to approve Consent Agenda item A, Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1993, on second reading, with a second from Paul Johnston. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Steve Thompson distributed a detail of the 1993 Proposed Supplemental Appropriation Items and discussed the changes made to the General Fund amount since first reading of Ordinance No. 33, Series of 1993, noting the increase was partly a result of the enhanced bus service program. He explained that when that enhancement had been discussed, it had been thought it was a 1994 cost, but, the enhancement began in November, 1993, and had to be accounted for in 1993. Tom Steinberg questioned whether there was any problem with PUC because the enhanced service extended beyond the Town of Vail. Steve advised that Mike Rose had contacted PUC, and was told there was no problem as long as the service was free to riders. Steve was directed to look into TOV's insurance coverage of this service. Steve also noted funds authorized by Council for the U.S. Ski Team from the 1994 Special Events budget had to be accounted for in the 1993 budget because the check was being written in 1993. He said the amount for this would be reflected as an adjustment in 1994's budget. Further, Workman's Compensation and Unemployment Insurance figures also had to be adjusted because the budgeting procedure for those had changed. Mayor Osterfoss inquired about the "Bus Grant Lobbyist -Avon" detail listed on the report Steve had distributed. Steve said, beside the grant for Avon, it was his understanding that TOV had entered into a contract for approximately $50,000.00 for services provided by Liz Robbins for her professional services in trying to get bus grants for the Town. He added Ms. Robbins was uncertain of her potential success rate and charges would probably not reach $50,000.00 He was not certain, but believed to date $10,000.00 had been 1 Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 12/21/93 1 billed to TOV by her. Mayor Osterfoss noted the Avon bus grant had not been approved in Congress, and conversations were underway with the Secretary of Transportation's office. She asked Steve if it was still necessary to continue paying Ms. Robbins until there was some success. Steve said he would have to check on that and on what had been paid year to date. He said he understood if Ms. Robbins felt that a grant could not be gotten for TOV, she was not going to continue billing TOV. Tom Steinberg moved to approve Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1993, with a second from Paul Johnston. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 3 on the agenda was Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1993, second reading, an ordinance repealing and reenacting Section 18.24.065 and 18.26.045, of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail, setting forth new procedures for exterior alterations or modifications of buildings in the Commercial Core I and Commercial Core II Zone Districts; and providing details in regard thereto. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Shelly Mello distributed results of staff's research with local architects, as requested by Council on first reading. There was discussion about the specific changes made to the ordinance since first reading, resulting in one additional change to be made on second reading to indicate that a filing fee shall not be collected for any exterior alteration which was only for the addition of an exterior dining deck; however, all other applicable fees would be required. The change would apply to both CCI and CCII. There was further clarification by ICristan Pritz regarding flexibility of remodel submittal dates and issues related thereto, and she added the Planning and Environmental Commission felt that it would be appropriate to limit submittal dates for exterior alterations of less than 100 square feet to encourage people to do their projects at one time every two years. Staff had no problem with allowing minor exterior alterations to be submitted at any time as it was felt the minor exterior alterations upgraded the Core areas. Merv Lapin moved to approve Ordinance No. 4, Series of 1993, on second reading with the suggested change regarding exterior dining decks. Jim Shearer seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 4 on the agenda was Resolution No. 17, Series of 1993, a resolution authorizing certain Town employees and officers to sign checks drawing on existing accounts or accounts to be opened in the future of the Town at the FirstBank of Vail and further authorizing certain employees of the Town to make deposits in said account. Mayor Osterfoss read the title in full. Merv Lapin moved to approve Resolution No. 17, Series of 1993, with a second from Tom Steinberg. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Item No. 5 was an appeal of the Planning and Environmental Commission (PEC) approval of the Payne Minor Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 4, Vail Village 3rd Filing. The appellants were Don and Nancy Byers. ICristan Pritz recalled that the PEC had approved the Payne minor subdivision conditioned on Council's approval of the associated rezoning requests in Ordinance No. 34, Series of 1993. Council had denied that ordinance on first reading on December 21,1993, and, therefore, this issue was now moot. To handle this appeal through proper procedure, the issue was before Council for an official vote. Merv Lapin moved to dismiss this appeal as the question was moot. Jim Shearer second the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously, 7-0. Before adjournment, Paul Johnston asked if the Lindholm land exchange issue would be on the January 4,1994, agenda. ICristan Pritz advised she had spoken with Bill Post about Council's desire to hear this issue while Mr. Lindholm was available. She was advised Mr. Lindholm could be present at the January 4, 1994, Evening Meeting, and the issue format would primarily be that of a public input session. Merv Lapin felt it was important that the community was aware of Mr. Lindholm's proposal, specifically regarding land exchange issues near Vail's boundaries. Also before adjournment, at Paul Johnston's request, ICristan Pritz discussed in depth staff's work with Dieter Menzel and Leo Palmer regarding TOV procedure to be followed for a potential minor amendment to an SDD at Pahnos Cappuccino Spirits. It was established that an application for that request had not yet been submitted for the desired minor amendment, although applications for the Liquor Authority process had been received by the Town Clerk. ICristan explained staff had been trying to help Mr. Menzel and Mr. Palmer through the process for applying for the minor amendment and dining deck in the courtyard Mr. Menzel wanted at Palmos. Details of the parking, seating capacity, storage spaces, and building codes related to this issue were discussed. Tom Steinberg noted past Council had encouraged the Community Devel.,r.~~ent Department (CDD) to be more "user friendly;' however, in this case, he felt Mr. Menzel was taking advantage of the CDD. ICristan did not feel that was so. She felt the applicant in this case had become frustrated with the regulations and the CDD was making efforts to help the applicant proceed through the process. Tom Moorhead advised the extent of the potential modifications for the deck would need to be established before the Liquor Authority could even hear the issue. Tom Steinberg remained concerned about such extensive TOV involvement. I<ristan said the CDD was willing to extend a little extra understanding, which she felt resulted in achieving end results more quickly and amicably. Tom Steinberg was reassured by Kristan indicating that there was a limit to what they can do, and that ' 'L Vail Town Council Evening Meeting Minutes 1?J21l93 was where the line was drawn. Merv Lapin stated he was pleased with the way this issue was being handled. Kristan advised she would pass that on to staff members who had done the work. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:07 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk Minutes taken by Dorianne S. Deto 3 Vai] Town Counc$ Evening Meeting Minutes 12/21/93 ORDINANCE NO. 1 SERIES OF 1994 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE VALUE PER ACRE OF LAND TO BE USED IN THE FORMULA TO CALCULATE THE CASH TO BE PAID IN LIEU OF LAND SCHOOL DEDICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 17.17.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL. WHEREAS, Section 17.17.020 requires the value per acre of land shall be set annually by the Town Council on an acre basis with recommendations from the School District; and WHEREAS, the Town Council, with recommendations from the School District, has established values to be used for fees in lieu of land dedication. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO THAT: Section 1 The value per acre to be used to calculate the cash to be paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 17.17.020 shall be fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per acre. Section 2 If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the Town Council hereby declares it would have passed this ordinance, and each part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more parts, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3 The Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. Section 4 The repeal or the repeal and reenactment of any provision of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail as provided in this ordinance shall not affect any right which has accrued, any duty imposed, any violation that occurred prior to the effective date hereof, any prosecution commenced, nor any other action or proceedings as commenced under or by virtue of the provision repealed or repealed and reenacted. The repeal of any provision hereby shall not revive any provision or any ordinance previously repealed or superseded unless expressly stated herein. Section 5 All bylaws, orders, resolutions, and ordinances, or parts thereof, inconsistent herewith are 1 Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1994 repealed to the extent only of such inconsistency. This repealer shall not be construed to revise any bylaw, order, resolution, or ordinance, or part thereof, theretofore repealed. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED ONCE IN FULL ON FIRST READING this 4th day of January, 1994, and a public hearing shall be held on this Ordinance on the 18th day of January, 1994, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vail Municipal Building, Vail, Colorado. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: .Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk READ AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED PUBLISHED this day of , 1993. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\ORD94.1 2 Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1994 ~ry~~)l. ao ~ ~.r~.c~. . ~ : l EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FEE 5OJ ~ JOHN LANGE -SUPERINTENDENT P.O. BOX 740 • EAGLF, COLORADO 81631 • (303) 328-6321 • FAX t303) 328-1024 November 29, 1993 Peggy Osterfoss, Mayor ~~own of Vail j Vail, CO 81657 Re: Eagle County School District Re50J School Impact Regulations Dear Mayor Osterfoss, Recently. the Eagle County Commissioners changed the school impact ' regulations to more accurately reflect the cost of land values throughout the' county. The new values vary according to location within Eagle County. Enclosed you will find a listing of the new ~ established values per acre. Please review these values and if you would like to c.,.,..a.ent on the new assessments, call the District Office ~ at 328-6321. i The school district is also. requesting that the Town of Vail consider - adopting regulations for land dedication similar in language and value to the .present county regulations. The Eagle County area is growing i tremendously and adoption of regulations that are similar in the towns f and county are critical to help offset the cast of land acquisition_ ;for new schools. I ~ Time is of the essence to enact the necessary regulations and j-ordinances... Please discuss this very important issue with the Town Council members and let us know where we can be of assistance. If the council is willing to adopt new regulations, please contact our office. We are very willing to work with your staff to initiate the new Subdivision Requirements for your Planning and Zoning Regulations. Thank you for your time in considering this matter. f S'ncerely, Dan Corcoran, President Eagle County School District Board of Education r Commissioner moved adoption of the following Resolution: ; L~ ~ _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS iiv ;r7 u ' 'C~~aia~+Y OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION. NO. 9_- IN THE MATTER OF CASH IN LIEU OF SCHOOL LAND DEDICATION PURSUANT TO 30-28-133(4)(a) C.R.S.., AND 2.18.01 EAGLE COUNTY°~LAND USE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Eagle, State of Colorado (hereinafter the "Board"), is authorized, pursuant to State enabling legislation including, but not limited to, C.R.S. 30-28-101, et sea., to plan for and regulate the use and development to land in the unincorporated territory of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity, and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the County of Eagle; and 'WHEREAS, the Board is directed by Section 2.18.01(p) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to determine and set annually the current market value of unimproved ,land on an acre basis; and WHEREAS, the Board, with recommendations from the School Districts, has established values to be used for fees in lieu of land dedication; and WHEREAS, the Board,-not having revised the land values for ten years, determine, for the purposes of 2.18.01(p), to be as follows with the boundaries of the precincts whose boundaries have been previously set by the Board: Full Market Value Common Name ` Precinct Per Acre of Area Precinct 1 $50,000 Red Cliff Precinct 2 $50,000 SW Vail Precinct 3 $50,000 Minturn Precinct 4 $50,000 Edwards Precinct 5 $10,000 Eagle Precinct 6 $10,000 Gypsum Precinct 7 $10,000 Basalt Precinct 8 $10,000 E1 Jebel Precinct 9 $ 7,500 Sweetwater Precinct 10 $ 7,500 Burns Precinct 11 7,500 Bond/McCoy Precinct 12 $50,000 NW Vail Precinct 13 $50,000 Vail Precinct 14 $50,000. East Vail Precinct 15A $50,000 Avon .Precinct 15B $50,000 Avon Precinct 16 $ 7,500 E. Eagle Precinct 17 $50,000 Eagle-Vail NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO: THAT the following are established as value per acre to be used in various formulas to calculate the cash to be paid in lieu of land school dedication pursuant to 2.18.01(p): Full Market Value Common Name Precinct Per Acre of Area _ Precinct 1 $50, 000 Red Cliff x'29• ~S •Precinct 2. $50,000 SW Vail Precinct 3 $50,000 Minturn Precinct 4 $50,000 Edwards Precinct 5 $10, 000 Eagle 1~~.~1~ Precinct 6 $10,000 Gypsum Precinct 7. 510,000 Basalt . Precinct 8 $10,000 E1 Jebel Precinct 9 $ 7,500 Sweetwater Precinct 10 $ 7,500 Burns Precinct 11 $ 7,500 Bond/McCoy Precinct 12 $50,000 NW Vail Precinct 13 $50,000 Vail Precinct 14 $50,000 East Vail Precinct 15A $50,000 Avon Precinct 15B $50,000 Avon Precinct 16 $ 7,500 E. Eagle Precinct 17 $50,000 Eagle-Vail The Board determines these values should be used, subject to the provisions of 2.18.01(p) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, until a further determination is made by the Board. THAT, this Resolution is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held. the day of 19 COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO By and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY ATTEST: COMMISSIONERS By: By: Clerk to the Board of George A. Gates, Chairman County Commissioners By: Johnnette Phillips, Commissioner By: James E. Johnson, Jr., Commissioner . Commissioner seconded adoption~of the foregoing resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: - Commissioner George A. Gates ,Commissioner Johnnette Phillips Commissioner James E. Johnson, Jr. . This Resolution passed by vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. ' / . . . - E:AGIE C~IUNTY RLRIIMNG ~'fFFKE VF IHt ~ ~ rp. EiI~X dSU COUNTY MANAGER ~ FAlilt. COlOR/1Ck~ B 183 I (303} 328.864$ ~ Fax: 1303} 3?8.7107 s•: EAGLE C~LlNrtll, :COLORADO MEMORANDUM TO: llVi>:~i~D PASi~S DATE: NOVEMBER 1T, 1993 FROM: JACK INGST'AD, PUBLIC RI:LATIUIVS RB: P1EW IN LIEU OF SCHOOL LAND• DEDICATION FEE I)ISCUSSIOI+IS int~..~led parties are invited to a discussion of the new in lieu of school land .dedication fees with the Eagle County Commissioners_ The discussion is scheduled for December •7, 1913 at 1b:00 a.m. in the Eagle County Room, 500 Broadway, Eagle. The County Commissioners adjusted the fees November i5, to reflect changes in marcei values ie precincts ttirougfiouf Eagle County.. The in lieu fee is calculated by a formula that rates into account ma.l~.~ value and units developed. Prior to the adjustment, marlrct value of all`land in Eagle County.wzs set at SS,OW as acre. Using _ ttie formula, the previous in lieu of 'fee calculated to a cost' to developers of S71 a unit. - The ne~v in lieu of fee on land valued at 530;000 an acre i>i~..:~ses to approximat+cly x'Il0 a unit. 1'he Commissioners set the fplloaring marl<ct valves November l S : Precinct ' 1-~ 550,000 (Red _Gliff); Precinct ~2-. ss0,0oo (Sw Vail), F.. ,...:net 3- x30,000 (Mintorn), . Precinct 4- 530,000 (Edwards);: Precinct 5-510,000 (l;agie), Precinct 6- 510,000 (Gypsum), Precinct 7- 510,000 (Basalt), Precinct 8- 310,000 (EI Jebel), Precinct 9- x'1,500 (Sweetwater), Precinct 10-, 37;500 (Burns),. Ptecinct~ll- x'1,500 (Bond/McCoy), Precinct 12-,t30,000.(NW Vail). `Precinct l3- ~SQ;000. (Vail), Precinct 14- 550,000 (East Vail),. Precinct 13A 330,000 (Avon), Precinct 1SB 550,000 (Avon), Prexinct 16- x7,500 (E. Eagle); Precinct 17- 630,000 (Nagle Vail). Developers, elected officials and other ieterested parties have requested an opportunity to review the data. for establishing maaf<ct values. The Commissioners sewed data from the assessor's: office rcgsrding recent sales in each ~f the precincts and adjusted marleet values accordingly. THfi MARB.ET YALU>~:S MA1~ BE SUB]ECT TO C.HANGL~ FOLLOWING THIS DISCUSSION. For further informsdon, please contact me at ehe Commission Office at 3Z8-8605. RESOLUTION NO. 1 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A PUBLIC PLACE WITHIN THE TOWN OF VAIL FOR THE POSTING OF NOTICE FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE VAIL TOWN COUNCIL, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, AND OTHER BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND AUTHORITIES OF THE TOWN OF VAIL. WHEREAS, Section 24-6-402(c), C.R.S., as amended provides that local public bodies must give full and timely notice to the public of any meetings at which the adoption of any proposed policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation, or formal action occurs at which a majority or quorum of the body is in attendance, or is expected to be in attendance; and WHEREAS, in addition to any other means of full and timely notice, the statute provides that a local public body shall be deemed to have given full and timely notice if notice of the meeting is posted in a designated public place within the boundaries of the local public body no less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the holding of the meeting; and WHEREAS, the statute further provides that the public place or places for posting of such notice shall be designated annually at the local body's first regular meeting of each calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Town of Vail now wishes to designate a public place within its boundaries for the posting of such full and timely notice to the public for meetings of the Town Council, the Planning and Environmental Commission, the Design Review .Board, and other boards, committees, and authorities of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. The Town Council hereby designates the bulletin boards at the east and west entrances of the Town of Vail Municipal Offices as the public places for the posting of full and timely notice to the public as provided for in 24-6-402(1)(c), C.R.S., as amended. 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of January, 1994. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\RESOLU94.1 Resolution Na. 1, Series of 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 2 SERIES OF 1994 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO VAIL VALLEY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT TO PROCEED WITH INSTALLING TWO (2) 12" WATER MAINS IN THE VICINITY OF DOWD JUNCTION AND I-70. WHEREAS, Section 12.04.230(6) requires approval of the Town Council for any street opening, excavation, or pavement cut after December 15; and WHEREAS, Vail Valley Consolidated Water District, and their representing contractor, are proceeding to install two (2) 12" water mains in the vicinity of Dowd Junction and I-70; and WHEREAS, Vail Valley Consolidated Water District will provide legal descriptions for the timely recording of easements for the water mains. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Vail, Colorado: 1. That a permit shall be issued for Vail Valley Water District, and their representing contractor, to proceed with installing two (2) 12" water mains in the vicinity of Dowd Junction and I-70 pursuant to and meeting all requirements of Chapter 12.04 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Vail. 2. That the Town Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this resolution is necessary and proper for the health, safety, and welfare of the Town of Vail and the inhabitants thereof. 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of January, 1994. Margaret A. Osterfoss, Mayor ATTEST: Holly L. McCutcheon, Town Clerk C:\RESOLU94.2 Resolution No. 2, Series of 1994 J .I 1~ TOWN OF VAIL 75 South Frontage Road mail, Colorado 81657 303-479-2100 FAX 303-479-2157 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ' December 30, 1993 Contact: Suzanne Silverthorn, 479-2115 Community Relations PUBLIC COMMENT. SOUGHT ON LINDHOLM LAND EXCHANGE J/~NUARY 4TH AT 6:30 PM IN ~VAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS (Vail)--The Vail Town Council will host a public meeting to assist the Piney Valley Ranches Trust in soliciting community input on a land exchange the trust may propose to the U.S. government. The meeting on the so-called Lindholm land swap will take place at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Jan. 4 in the Vail Town Council Chambers and will include a presentation by the trust, to be followed by public comment. The contemplated proposal pertains to the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) obtaining: --Certain portions of the Nottingham Ranch, which is presently located east of the Town of Avon and running to the Dowd Butte above West Vail. --Sweetwater Lake Resort and Ranch, a 371 acre parcel located on Sweetwater Creek in Garfield County. --17,162 acres in Costilla County, known as the Bluebonnet Ranch. In exchange, the trust would possibly obtain: (more) Public Meeting/Add 1 --Certain national forest lands adjacent to the Nottingham Ranch. --Approximately 4,000 acres of national forest land currently interspersed with the trust's private property near Muddy .Pass. --240 acres of BLM land adjacent to the trust's private property in the Piney Valley, presently on the BLM disposal list and under grazing permit to the trust. The trust has asked the Vail Town Council to support the effort., It isn't known yet if the council will agree to consider the matter. Tuesday's public meeting is expected to last three hours. Citizen reaction to the land exchange proposal is strongly encouraged. # # # VAIL DALLY (December 21; 1993.) . _..:~cr..i w L ~ n~ h o s m~;:R Swedish millionaire Magnus LmdhO~m ' ;•.a: Lindholm is expected to meet with ~ ~ that the value of the lands offered The BLM has expressed "serious to meet Eagle County residents in Vail next., FI'Olll Page 1 outside Eagle County are low. interest" in the acquisition of the -;;_~y,~~ month to discuss the controversial . Post indicated in an October Letter , acreage in ~ostilla County. _^;It~;$ Piney Valley Ranches Trust ` )arid would hinder deer migration. to ICristan Pritz, Vail's director of ~ ¦ ' ~ swaP• The proposal discussed at the community development, that "if the The bureau has been unable to get ,l~ An evening public forum is set for:., Avon meeting was a revised plan that exchange proceeds as.presently con- funding from the Land and Water with Vail=:~_.~ . _ w:.l . Jan..4 in the. Vail Town Council doesn't extend as far north into criti- figured, it would result in the Forest Conservation Fund for the.acquisi- ' . ¦ ~ Chambers. - ~ cal elk and deer migration and win- Service acquiring a portion of the lion for the last three yeazs. The Avon Town Council held~'a' tering areas as the original proposal: largest remaining, privately owned ~ d{ent~ ~3. special meeting earlier this month Opponents argued at that time parcel in the upper Vail alley.... I[ Post said that after hearing com- • - that drew fishing and hunting outfit- that prime hunting areas in Eagle would permanently prevent new sub= ments from Vail officials and resi- By Kristin L. Kenney ters, ranch owners and represents- County would be lost, that congres- division and road building in the dents, the next stop for input will be dairy seas veneer _ lives of the U.S. Forest Service. ' ; sionai approval would open the upper Trapper's Run cJrainage and with the Eagle County commission- Although none of the land in goes= , floodgates for more land swaps and Dowd Butte above West Vail." ers. lion is within Vail, Lindholm isseek- ~ - - ~ ing support from communities adja--~ ; cent to the proposed swap sites.::r:;;c: Lindholm wants to acquire 8.119.; acres of U.S.`Forest Service, lajtil ' ~ adjacent to land he owns along Nett tingham Gulch near _ Eagle-Vai~:, Lindholm:proposes togive the Forest° . Service 823 acres along the top~pf'; Davos Trail iri return. The trade also involves swapping; over.4,000 acres of Forest Service;; and 'Bureau of Land Management: land in the Piney Valley for 3'll,accie~ . at Sweetwater Resort in the FIat'ro and 17,162 acres in Costilla~Co~u`ri#+~~, "When.we~have a formal ~iro:~ ~ al, then we will ask for endorsemi'n said Bill Post, a local lawyer•repie=;' ' sensing Lindholm. Vail Mayor Peggy Osterfoss Etas:;, said she is uncertain if the Towitbf~~ ..Vail should take a stand. ~ ; Post said that before his client^t malizes a proposal, he will continue to look at several alternatives_:arid . address Colorado Division f Wildlife concerns. The DOW fear§`ti ' that development in the ~area~fr6iri; •Nottingham Gulch to Traer Gut= MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager DA: December 29, 1993 RE: Council Retreat The 1994 Council Retreat has been scheduled for Monday, January 3, 1994. The retreat will be held at SaddleRidge at Beaver Creek. The retreat will begin at 8:30 A.M., and should conclude no later than 5:00 P.M. Parking is a major concern. Please plan to carpool or park at the Beaver Creek Visitor's Center and take the bus up to SaddleRidge. The property cannot accommodate more than six (6) cars maximum. Carpooling departure times from the Town of Vail Municipal Building are as follows: 8:00 A.M. Council, Bob McLaurin, Miles Weigold, and Bob Lamberti. 9:30 A.M. Senior staff. The schedule for the retreat is as follows: 8:30 A.M. - 9:00 A. M. Continental breakfast/Larkspur Room. Attendees: Council, Bob McLaurin, Miles Weigold, and Bob Lamberti. 9:00 A.M. - 10:00 A.M. Executive Session: Personnel Matters. 10:00 A.M. - 10:15 A.M. Senior staff arrival. Attendees: Pam Brandmeyer, Steve Thompson, Dick Duran, Tom Moorhead, Suzanne Silverthorn, Annie Fox, Holly McCutcheon, Larry Grafel, Ken Hughey, Kristan Pritz, Buck Allen. 10:15 A.M. - 12:00 P.M. Begin work to establish the Town of Vail Organizational MissionNision/Goals. 12:00 P.M. - 1:00 P.M. Lunch. 1:00 P.M. - 3:00 P. M. Continue work on Mission/Vision/Goals. 3:00 P.M. - 3:15 P.M. Break. 3:15 P.M. - 5:00 P.M. Complete work on Mission/Vision/Goals, if needed. As I have indicated to you, I believe this retreat is critical in order for us to establish a clear direction for the work program for the coming fiscal year. Please feel free to give me a call if you have questions regarding the schedule or topics to be discussed. I look forward to seeing you on January 3. ~,~~..,~n~„.s.^ MEMORANDUM TO: Vail Town Council FR: Bob McLaurin, Town Manager DA: December 29, 1993 RE: Council Retreat The 1994 Council Retreat has been scheduled for Monday, January 3, 1994. The retreat will be held at SaddleRidge at Beaver Creek. The retreat will begin at 8:30 A.M., and should conclude no later than 5:00 P.M. Parking is a majar concern. Please plan to carpool or park at the Beaver Creek Visitor's Center :and take th_ a bus up to SaddleRidge. The property cannot accommodate more than six (6) cars maximum. Carpooling departure times from the Town of Vail Municipal Building are as follows: 8:00 A.M. Council, Bob McLaurin, Miles Weigold, and Bob Lamberti. 9:30 A.M. Senior staff:. The schedule for the retreat is as follows: 8:30 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. Continental breakfast/Larkspur Room. Attendees: Council, Bob McLaurin, Miles Weigold, and Bob Lamberti. 9:00 A.M. - 10:00 A.M. Executive Session: Personnel Matters. 10:00 A.M. - 10:15 A.M. Senior staff arrival. Attendees: Pam Brandmeyer, Steve Thompson, Dick Duran,. Tom,Moorhead, Suzanne Silverthorn, Annie Fox, Holly McCutchean; Larry Grafel, Ken Hughey, Kristan Pritz, Buck Allen. 10:15 A.M. - 12:00 P.M. Begin work to establish the Town of Vail Organizational MissionNisioNGoals. 12:00 P.M. - 1:00 P.M. Lunch. 1:00 P.M. - 3:00 P.M. Continue work on MissionNisioNGoals. 3:00 P.M. - 3:15 P.M. Break. 3:15 P.M. - 5:00 P.M. Complete work on MissionNision/Goals, if needed. As I have indicated to you, I believe this retreat is critical in order for us to establish a clear direction for the work program for the coming fiscal year. Please feel free to give me a calf if you have questions regarding the schedule or topics to be discussed. I look forward to seeing you on January 3. p,~liei,, 0 1 ° TO: Vail Town Council . Department Heads FROM:. Pam Brandme er DATE: November 8,1993 SUBJECT: TOWN OF VAIL GOAL RANIQNGS FOR 1993 - _ 1. Acgw' land as required for future employee housing, transp,,,.:~.tion needs, open Lands, aid other public purposes. (1)"" . 2. Investigate mechanisms .and initiate within two years a Valley--wide arr.oach to s ~idmg services under .one uatbrella~ organization to solve ~.,...mon problems, ~ avoid duplication, and improve the value delivered for tax dollars spent; i.e., public transpoitation and housing. (2) 3, Facilitate construction and ..retention .of local housing: within the Gore Valley starting3mmediatel Provide land, joint finaicing, and a positive atmosphere for •employer controlled housing that will always be owned by the Town of Vail and. built by the r.~ gate sector. (3) - 4a. Become a leader among communities by implementing an environmental strategic plan` to ad~ress .air quality, .water., quality, "recycling, chemical use, and second hand smoke. V11ork witl%~the private sector to encourage reduction of smoking in - public places. (4) 4b. .Through planning, continue to balance growth and redevelopment to insure the needs of the community are met. (9) - 5. ~ Continue.to implement. a Village and I3onshead;delivery./distribution plan which is :asnear vehicle free as possible. Investigate the feasibility and location fora _ centralized delivery/distribution center. (10) 6. Implement continuous quality improvemeirt programs for all systems, methods, and procedures, both internal as well as external, for the Town of Vail. (7) . 7a. .Increase the greening of Gore Valley by planting trees, shrubs, and flowers with a special emphasis on the 170 corridor. (5) •8 ~d ° a Goals page 2 7b. Construct .a perf.,....ance and. conf ~ ,ce. center as a. Valley-wide public-r.: gate point venture, thereby expanding. tourism and cultural opportunities/facilities to summer, fall,'and winter within the next four years. (6) 8. Complete the Town; of Va~7 b' ' g and walking. trails system as soon as possible, . as well as increase and enhance areas foi pedestrian use. {8) 9. Provide trafSc congestion reanedies within Vail. (16) 10. In a..:.~,dance with the Master Land Use Plan, plan develwr...ent of the Vail Commons area. (13) 11. .Develop. a master plan for the imr., ~ cement and redevel,.,r...ent of Lionshead to , take place over the next three years. (11) 12. Work with CDOT to address safety, speed, health, noise and other environmental issues on 'the I-70 ~.,..:dor. (14) ~ ~ . 13. Ensure that ,guests- :can comfortably and economically travel to Vail by ..encouraging the State to investigate "public alternative transportation from Denver's airport to t11e Eagle Airport. (12) 14. Investigate the public benefit of muniapal control of select Gore Valley utilities. (15) Represents ranking in last year's goals. s e- GOAL Sc ~ ~ iNG REO/ISIONS • - LIST BY PRIORITY WITH M1 @EING YOUR HIGHEST PRIORITY GOAL. PRtvrr ~ t MIN pY IS?M ~EBY JIM S. PEGGY 84fl . : ~ ~4. S4S9L TOP 16 Si4AL M1 1 9 2 1 5 1 1 14 1 1- MZ 4 -1 5 8 14 2 2 96 2 2 M3 16 10 1-.~ 4 1 8 # 39 9 3 M4 5 7 -4 6 7 7. 10 48 4 4,9 MS 6 12 11 9 10 - 6 7 61 7 10 ' M6 7 13' 0 7 3 11 •11 61 7 7 M7 13 8 7 5 8 94 ~ 5 60 6 5,6 M8 15 4 10 10 12 5 6 62 8 8 ' M9 12 5 9 2 6 4 14 46 4 16 M10 3 2 12 13 9 12 3 54 5 13 , • M11 10 15 13 14 4 9 8 73 11 11 - M12 11 - 6 14 15 15 13 15 89 13 - ~4 M13 8 9 8 11 11 8 12 68 10 12 M14 - 2. 16 15 12 13 10 13 80 12 15 M15 9 14 16 16 16 16 9 96 14 ' M16 14 11 ~ 6 3 2 15 16 67 9 F~GFNTIAI r~nAl 1..,Acquisition of Open Space 8. Balanced Growth/Redevelopment ' 2, Consolidation of Services _ ~.10. ~eliveryJDistribution Plan ~3. Employee Housing _ 11. Lionshead Master Plan 4..: Environmental Strategic Plan - ~ 12. ~4ttemative Airport Transportation _ 5. -Greening of Gore Valley - 13. Vail Commons 6. ,Performance & Conference Center • . 1.4. I-70 Corridor - •,;Qualify Improvement Process 45. Munidpal Control of Utilities • 8. `~Blcing/Ped'estrian Trails System ~ 16. Traffic Congestion Remedies .:i. l = ~1P R G.~lNIZA.~'10N MAYOR QUALITY CONTROL TOWN MANAGER RESIDENT . 4 EMPLOYEES 7 MEMBER , STEERING TEAM 9 MEMBER I VFP VIP VIP TEAM TEAM TEAM ROLES AN11 RESPONS1~itL1'1'1~;S, * I Qu~~ ~ courrc~, l • RESOURCES • TRAINING • T1ME • DIRECTION/POLICY • DECISIONS * * I STEERING TEAM • FACILITATION • ASSISTANCE TO TEAMS • COLLECTION OF IDEAS • CHARTERING OF V1P i tAMS • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION ~k * * I TEAM3/INDNIDUALS 1 • MAKE IDEAS KNOWN • VOLUNTEER FOR TEAM'S • PARTICIPATE IF NOT ON TCAM • IMPLEMENT N~ - SO WKAT IS VIP ? ITS A PROCESS TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE TIC SERVICES VIE PROVIDE TO OUT CUSTOMERS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE TOWN OF VAIL GOVERNMENT. 4* TOV VIS10N TO BE THE WORLD'S PREMIER RESORT COMMUNITY MISSION QU~I,~ ~ICIPAL TO-PR~~DE' 5 A~ i'E~E~~ SER~CE ORT THE' C~1~ZM~ITY~S THAT S~P L CUST~~~' VISION T~ ~ vlP PR oc~ss INDIVIDUAL ~ ~ - STEERING TEAM r QUALITY COUNCIL STEERING-TEAM VIP TEAM INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL ~uw~-~' t urn ~ ~ ~ QUALITY COUNCIL Lorelei Donaldson Larry Grafel Ken Hughey Jim Spell Rod Slifer Peggy Osterfoss Bob McLaurin STEERING TEAM AI Bosworth Susan Boyd - Susie Combs Cathy Dolan Bob Mach Linda Moore Larry Pardee Kristan Pritz Sandy Yost Pam Brandmeyer Merv Lapin Paul Johnston - DRUG FREE WORKPLACE ACTION TEAM . - Tom Collins ' Tony Cordova Elaine Duran Brian Hoyt Desiree Kochera Andy Knudsten PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ACTION TEAM Brenda Chesman Carol Hall Jim Hoza Gary Murrain ~ - Reatha Schmidt - Steve Wright - Cooter Overcash C:~YIPTEAMS.LST ' TQM Seminar notes December 13, 1993 * Put up a flyer or make a brochure "Your parking fees at work" listing reasons why prices are going up 1. Covered parking 2. Free largest bus system.. * First thing for the committees to work on is getting goals and mission statement down in writing. * Work on an action plan using section 8 in work book to help with guide lines and getting started. * Post goals and mission statement in a conspicuous spot so that all team members can learn them and remember them. Use DIP work book "center fold" to assist with goals and mission statement. * When creating goals, ask yourself "how sill I (we) meet this goal?" If you can't answer it, rework the goal. Goals must be obtainable and measurable. * Work on a complete manual for my job. Should be able to turn job over to anyone and be able to do my job. All processes must be documented. * TQM Plan - Use info written in book - Seven elements: .People, Leadership, etc. using strengths and opportunities. * Benchmarking - Steering team or Quality Council - Need to get educated on how to do it (books, video, tapes)' Review with group what type of company to benchmark ie, size, population, location of another town. * "DIP AHEAD - THE ROAD TO SIICCESS IS IINDER CONSTRIICTION" Group: Customer focus and satisfaction #1 We have a process to determine our customers future needs and expectations. . PROCESS TO DETERMINE .NEWS/EXPECTATIONS _ STRENGTHS OPPORTIINITIES Bi-annual citizens surveys -Evaluations surveys are - All property owners/residents seasonal short term view "Comment cards" distributed - "Down Valley" residents - Many survey's in place involved? "Vail Associates -All Town employees aware "Transportation of results - Surveys returned rate 30$:.. - Process for comment cards Good or bad? documented and followed? - Council uses survey results - Surveys proactive "What to determine focus do you need?" VS reactive "How do you feel about..." - Survey is external minimal internal -Survey frequency adequate? #2 We talk to customers on a regular basis and we take action based upon customer feedback. STRENGTHS OPPORTIINITIES - Speak up meetings at Town - "Squeeky wheel" theory. Council (3 per year now) listen to only those who - Changes available, phone, attend mtgs. - Single voice letters, meetings, dept. head responsible to all citizens? does involve all employees when Data says no! -Little • appropriate in some departments evidence of progress to talk with citizens and utilize existing communication Channels. - Employee communication exists? ,#3 We have service standards that guide our interrelations with customers - Success standards for some - Little evidence of formal departments documented process to document success - Strong feeling in some depts of standards to all employees with published standards such as- Wide range across depts in "Smile School" documenting performance - High individual standards in standards for employees place with most employees - Update of all performance - High moral and team spirit standards - Process in some dept to convey service standards #4 We.make explicit commitments to our customers regarding our "products and services ' -Good department understanding -'What is definition of _ . of commitment values and services? - Go out of their way to help - Need to educate customers willingness to take to the commitments responsibility - Town wide has no specific ; - Individual commitment TQM formal commitments positive step . - Quality of TOV tools and environment #5 We have a process for handling our customers formal and informal complaints - Individual depts have complnts -Need more details documented response process in place for complaints - Responsiveness of TOV to - Consolidate various depts . complaints approach for handling - Building dept have formal complaints complaint board in place - Need additional analysis to' improve system - Look to other depts who have strong complaint system already in place w - ~ #6 We have a method for measuring customers satisfaction STRENGTHS O]PPORTIINITIEB - TOV community survey process in - No formal measurement process place in place/form analysis - No definition of customer satisfaction - Need following to track satisfaction - No sampling of "total" customer base "ie..tourists, guests, down valley residents - Capture other entities surveys data - Need to explore other ways of measuring customer satisfaction #7 We track data in customer satisfaction to continually improve - Need to track data - Reactive to complaints PEOPLE #1 We actively contribute to meeting our departments goals - Most people are aware - Some people not participating - TQM pointing in the right - Inter dept. goal setting need direction standardization - Spread buy-in - Town goals? What are they? #2 We have education plans that address TQM concepts - Limited TQM plans - Money for TQM education -.Some depts have programs - Town wide (committees) #3 We receive feedback about and recognition for our contributions - Bonus coupons - Do more recognition - Safety suggestions - Restoration of good job - Positive evaluations - Personal recognition - - 5 year dinner ,#4 We create a work environment that is conducive to our well being and moral - Purchased stress relief - Regressive over time equipment with own money - Erosion of benefits - Safety committee bingo - Cost of living - Comps - Golf course, ski; etc - Opinion survey utilizing - Loyalty of employees - 6-7 questions, do this - on an annual basis i ~ 'r. i i LEADERSHIP #1 We create an environment for quality excellence and customer focus j STRENGTH OPPORi~ui~iTIEB - Willingness to move forward - More effort toward excellence in TQM. ~ and customer focus; Y - Individual employees show ~ excellence to teamwork #2 We have dept quality values regarding quality before schedule, our commitments are sacred - Strengths documentation in - Greater level of commitment some departments total .buy in needed Documented values need to be - Documented values are not brought into line with communicated town wide operational values #3_ TQM concepts are integrated into our daily activities " - Broken french - some attempt - Need to integrate TQM values • to apply principles at levels in the organiz.atiori in total in the organization - Universal language] - Did not name it TQM but have - Teach everyone to speak the been doing it to some degree same language #4 Our departments accomplishments are publicized and 'shared - Public relations person in Town - PR utilization of the media - Awareness of_need for better in positive town matters communication from Town to - Radio, TV, print,fnewspapers community - Quality press release upbeat INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS #1 We use a centralized base of customer oriented data to run our department - - Beginning of implementation - Network information on a in some depts ie bus, TRC, centralized database for the Library, PD, FD TOV _ - Establish a database mangment position. for TOV #2 We analyze our database on info to improve our departments operations - Better utilization~of the data collected by various departments ~ #3 We use benchmark information to improve our department - Some have done some - Target communication that benckmarking would provide a good - Colorado Muni league, Colorado opportunity for ben'chmarking Association Ski Towns, Snow - Orchestrate a benchmark Conference effort within. the TQM program ie: Steering, Quality Council - Study Demographics to choose this benchmark comparison . ~ I i I . ~ i - ~ QUALITY PLANNING #1 We have a department plan that supports our goals STRENGTHS n7~POR'~t1NT,TIEB . - Beginnings of a plan ie: - Put plans in writing Steering, Quality Council, Action teams - Commitment of plan by Council #2 We have short term and long term objectives - Short term goals (tactical) - Develop long term thinking and goals - Improve planning linkage PROCESS QIIALITY #1 Our key processes are documented . - Program budget, VIP - Identify and document key - Some departments have minimal processes process identification - Review Section "7" DIP book #2 We have a method for controlling our key processes - Develop controls when forming . processes #3 We continuously improve our key processes to meet our departments goals (ie: defect elimination, cycle time reduction, etc) - Budget process in working on - Link processes to goals budget and VIP, Comdev - Review Section "7" #4 We work with our suppliers to assure our quality requirements - Fleet and TRC have high - More communication internally standards (external) _ RESULTS #1 We track trends in defect elimination and cycle time reduction for our products and services ' - Some departments are tracking -Build process (unify) to track . data and utilize data im~~lement program budget (FY94) #2 We track trends in defect elimination and cycle time reduction for our key business processes - Is awareness in some depts - Go through process work #3 We track trends in defect elimination and cycle time reduction for our key suppliers - Some departments are currently - Use fleet maintenance as model tracking and have ID process - Explore internal and external and cycles for suppliers suppliers cycle time and process #4 We track trends in the operational benefits our department receives from its TQM activities NOTHING FOR THIS - NEED DRASTIC IMPROVEMENTS • _ . _ r ~ - ~ i a, i ~ +i LEADERSHIP - GROUP WORKSHOP ACTION PLAN Teach everyone to speak the language 1) Teach TQM a. Workshops-conduct fundamental training for all!TOV full time and seasonal employees ~ b. Identify who will be doing the training? (It has been recommended that Bob McLaurin do training) c. Identify a specific date when this will be completed (It has been recommended that this be completediby.6/30/94 d. Issues: Seasonals? Year round e. Prioritize departments to attend and learn fundamentals f. Teach the teachers appropriately i 2) Integrate TQM values throughout TOV ~ . a. Identify departmental efforts ~ "Translate" to TQM values/vocabulary ~ b. Utilize tools .available ie: Glossary (DIP, fundamentals) - 3).Definition of TQM for all Town employees 4) Quality Council - Define TQM i a. What .is it? How does it apply to me?~ . b. Start with. simple language ~ . c. Who to define? = Quality Council 5) Make sure values are not driving decisions town wide a. Communicate TOV values Town wide b. Values should drive decision making process PROCESS Define TOV organizational values " Issues: Define department values? (need input from ' all TOV employees Communicate and deploy to TOV employees Team meaning ; of values "Do we walk the talk" a. Who: Steering team to form an action plan b..When completed: 3/31/94 i t i i ~ , i (*susie~TQM) i i i a ~I ~ { ~ ~ ~ . . " - :QUALITY STEERINd TEAM - SHORT TERM OOALB 1. .Empower individuals .to :make decisions that directly affect their work/jobs. ~ _ 2. Integrate continuous improvement in everything we do....work .t smarter not, harder. , - ~ 3. Promote cooperation and .teamwork between individuals, groups, . and departments. - 4. Increase ~~..~loyee involvement and participation in the decision making processes. ~ _ 5. Provide the necessary training and development resources to the Action Teams. 6. Take on the coach/facilitator roles for the Action Teams. . 7. Delight our customers!!!! - S Y .~.:._'~~~Qv~LaTY sTEERIN~i TEAM LONG TERM mOALB I ""1. Become~a,learning organization where"people welcome change and innovation, constantly look -for ways to it~prove 'and "develop, and are rewarded for doing so. i . 2. Empower .individuals to own and manage their' learning & development.. _ , 3. Enable individuals and .groups to network to solve problems, " exchange experiences, i~ad transfer learning. ~ " 4. Develop a cadre of skilled coaches and facilitators across the organization. ~ 5.. Become. a work force of highly skilled, flexible learners, continually searching for improvement and new ways ofworking. 6. Delight our customers!!!! ' ~ 1 _ - - ~ " , I i " ~ ' . - i . _ ~ _ ; " ' S: . Quality steering Team Short Term Goals (up to 1 pear) (Proposed 11-17-93j 1) Achieve good working relationships between all departments. 2) Continue to build team spirit. 3) Maintain a high caliber of. employees. , 4) Empower employees to make decisions effecting service to . customers and to take on more responsibilities. 5) Develop a regular pattern of positive recognition of employees. 6) Further improve performance and participation of employees, enhance cost efficiency, and arrive at satisfied customers. 7) Provide favorable treatment to all Vail customers. 8) Provide information to customers in an easily accessible format . (*susie\stgoals) S!j , ` Quality Steering Team Long Term Goals (1-3 years) (Proposed 11-17-93) 1) Work on building trust amongst fellow employees throughout the organization. 2) Continue to educate the Council on ways to maintain a serious commitment to make positive changes as recommended by staff. 3) Continue to educate Council and the Town Manager on ways to be more visible and to interface regularly with employees in their working environment. 4) Create a method of informing all employees of the decisions made by Council and provide the underlying rational behind those decisions. 5) Continue to work on the development of teamwork through delegation and additional responsibilities. 6) Continue to train employees in team skills including problem - solving skills, skills in team process, how to run efficient meetings, etc. (*susie\ltgoals) TOWN l7F VAIL ~ ` 1894 BUDGET SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND e..r e.~DITURES AND CHANGES M FUND BALANCE i Fund Estimated Eatinuted; Transfers RdMaward EstirrraMd &dpebd BudpeMd Transfers Ravenw Budgeted Sa Revenw E~andituros INOut E~errdituros Fund Belerree Revenue E~endRuros IN(Out) Over/(Unds?) Fund Bslanw i FUND 1/1!93 1893 1993 1993 To 1994 1993 194+1 1894 1994 Emenditures 1994 General Fund 3,478,708 14.854.888 14,770.936 {886.89f;) 2 i77,78A' 14.075.591 14,124.888 58.321 7.228 2:784993 i SoeelN Revenue Funds: CapRal ProJsets Fund 2.807,318 7.388,773 5.488.180 (1,850,542) 1,543.095 1.034 296:: 8.821.122 4,024.851 (2.954,910) (58.472) ' 915,823; 1 Real Estate Transfer Tax Fund 3.182,058 2.198.777 2,785.428 479.783. 2 tl8`{ 8'18: 1.538,250 2,528,525 - (990,275) 1;103 371 ? ' spedai a. ~ , 2.231 306,050 (3oa,zal) 'o`Cbsed ~ Po9oeConflsationFund 458,485 28.000 158,000 18,884 ,.::.:,601:; 22.000 238,595 Q14,53~ 948th: vaN Marketirrp Fund ete,o791 709.7 ~ 72t,ooo ~21.31ii1 6s9soo eoe,5ot 29,99s aa~9 Va0 Houshrp Fund 33.000 438,598 !189'. 96.000 90,000 30.000 95,000 ;!01598 u. ,!read Mall Nra)sct Fund 778 (77~ ;0`Cbsed a Bond P , . ~ ConstruWon Fund 5,897,478 87,749 3.125.009 (2.832.857) y,2S9: 40,000 40.000 47,x; ~ . m )nterru 1 Servke Funds: • Heavy Equlprrbrd Fund 339,138 1.535,864 1,44T,S02 427 498: 1,562,810 - 1,523,391 59,St8 '.487 017 Health Insuronee Fund 488.184 817.983 741,247 862'890 1.002,981 912.880 80,121 i2306t, a Ed,:. s Fund: • Parldnp 3Urxiuro Enterprise Fund 2.033.788 9.817.445 (88,321) 0 0 , ; Dsbt Savic~Funds: 174 87s 129 Eta 2951.910 0 ~I~Jff+lt31 Town of YaN Debt Service Fund 1,854,881 183.588 5,08S,4t~ 4.891.780 <~;'.;488A:781; 9. 4 18119 737 S 337 3408 Servos Fund est Vail Debt , W (f `:Closed 39 493 105 750 42 502 Mao Debt Serviee Fund 23.755 Uorrshead . s:''6~i9;: 40 S11 41.858 (1.34~``.s:iD1,~04`' Booth Croak Debt 3srvice Fund 0 224.451 121.802 ;z <102. Total 18.107.278 28.585.593 34.524,419 0-_ 2,039,842 i':1Aa2ta:8i1' _28106312 29,139.071 0 (1,032,799Y?`s': ~.095i~ FDSUFA393.vAc4 12/07/93 l TOWN OF Y~11L i993 THIRD QUARTER 1=1NANCIA,L REPORT ::ESTIMATES TO:YEAR.END ;1993 '1993 _ VARIANCE GENERAL FUNO~REVENUE BUDGET ESTIMATE .OVER7(UNDER Taxes Property 8 ownership Taxes 2,169,327 2,169,327 0' Retail Sales Tax 7,023,200 7,170,700 147,500 Ski lift Tax 992,250 992,250 0: Franchise Fees 506,000 504,400 ;1,600 Penalty 8 Interest 44,000 44,000: 0 Subtotal Taxes 10,734,777 10,880,677 , , , , 745,900; Construction Fees 260,211 622,000 36'1,789 Licenses 8 Permits 44,100 54,720 10,620 Charges for Services 208,832 206,460 _ X2,372 Trans rtation Centers 1,710,675 1,752,176 ;;:;';::;:;::::;::'::;47;50; Po Intergovernmental revenue ~ 930,168 945,000';;;;:;;:';;;€;''4832 Fines 8 Forfeitures 241,750 215,000 :'<< {26,750 > ; Other 268,655 278,655 10000: ITOTAL:CF°REVENUE : 14;399:'!68 ;14954;688 555,520 - ; 1993 ;'1993: :VARIANCE . GENERAL FUP~lD EXPENSES BUDGET.... ESTIMATE OVER/~tJNDER Town Officials 831,836 831,600 ;::.;::;::;.::;;;;:;;:::`;:.(236 Administrative Services 1,186,295 1,178,014 <<;;;>.:`_(8;28'I Community Relations 174,103 170,829 (3;274 Community Development 1,025,066 1,025,066 '0. Police - 2,916,247 2,875,539 :.:.:::::.:..::;40,7013 . Fire 1,034,663 1,027,756 ,:(6,907 Public Works 2,423,432 2,347,284. {76,.148 Transit 1,954,870 1,951,455 (3,415 Transportation Centers 1,046,653 1,046,568 (85 VRD Contract 543,243 543,243 :>;,;:::;::::><:::>:::;:_::0 Library 672,685 672,685 0 _ Insurance 282,292 271,504 (10,788 - Contingency 7,900 7,900<><':<;.:`0: Contributions S Events 794,780 ~ 797,168 , 2;388 Employee Benefrts 30,227 24 325 >15;902 'TOTAL GF; EXPENDITURES ....:...:'!4;924,292.:' : ` :14;770,936 _ .(153,356 . SURPL)S/(SHORTFALL? >183,752: ; . j 2~TRFIN2 PAGE 2 ~ 12/07/93 . ~ ' ` 9993: 1993 VARIANCE;.:. ' CAPITAL PRO.fECTS REVENUE . BUDGET :ESTIMATE :.:OVER/(UNDER • Retail Sales Tax 4,999,280 5,101,780 , .;1Q2,500; County Sales Tax 195,000 198,000 3,D00 Ski Lift Tax 992,250 992,250 `t) Earnings on Investments 165,000 165 000 0' Transfer From 1992 Bond Proceeds Fund 2,632,957 2,632,957 RETT Loan Repayment 929,743 929,743 0 ~ :T4TAi:REVENUE . ; :;7.281;273 ::.10;07.9,730 2,738.457: 9993: ' 1993: ;.:'VARIANCE . CAPITAL PRd.IECTS FUND.EXP, . BUDGET ...ESTIMATE OVER/(UNDER . 150 Misc. 8idewaiks 8 W Ped Connection 175 _ ; : < 175 201 Stree4 Light Improvement Program 35,548 35,548 0 407 Iri4emational Bridge Replacement 4,000 4,000 !'p' ; 51p Parking Structure Capital Maintenance 176,345 176,345 0 511 Slifer Fountain Repair 39,844 40,000 "156 515 Municipal Annex Remodel 2,553 2,553 D> _ 524' Bus Shelter Imp 8 Replace 59,089 59,089 0' _ 550 Misc. Building Maintenance 25,000 25,000 ;0 551 Town Shop Ventilation System 18,983 19,360.. 37Z 705, Streetscape Design 691 691 0 904 Comm Sys Maint. 8 Replace 12,330 12,330 " 0, 906 Replace Mobile Fire Radios 15,000 15,000 ;0 921 Snow Dump Site 146,485 146,485 p 928 Land Purchase Vail Commons 3,170,000 3,132,957 < ~3Z,0!43 929 Performance 8 Arts Center 73,490 73,490 ;0. 930 Fire Extraction Equipment 16,000 16,000 0. . 93.1. Retrotd Buses Perimeter Seating 17,500 17,706 :::206. 932 Relocate Checkpoint Charlie 500 386 (1,14 Continued: - 2QTRFIN2 ~ PAGE 3 12/07/93 i ' i993: _ < 1993. ' 1/ARIANCE , . CAPITAL.I'ROJECTS FUND:EXP . BC3DGE'I' . `::ESTIMATE.: >:OVERI~tJNDER 981 Computer Oriented Irrigation Project 202 147 ;{55 984 Pedestrian Overpass Walkway 9,235 9,235 0 _ 987 Second Radio Channel 16,000 16,000 ::;<;':>s<`:;<Q 991 ADA Improvements 47,600 47,600 =0:: . 409 Gore Creek Bridge Enhancements 30,000 30,000 a) Golf Maintenance Parcel Purchase 195,914 187,490 ::.>;::_.(8,424 • West Vail Mudslide MRigation 10,000 _ 10,000 0; Misc. Heavy Equip Vehicles 163,000 163,000 0;. 9,010 Transfer to Debt Service 4,609,780 4,583,499 X26,289 Projects to be Rolled into 1994: 110 Street Maint & Improvements 929,057 ~ 870,739 ; ,;»..;.;;..:(58;318._ .408 Chapel Bridge Design 94,000 76,000 .::,;;;:(18,D00 501_ Snow Dump Road /Shop 8 Bus Bam Maint 234,990 0 X334,990 :554 PW Office Remodel 439,898 65,000 `{374.,898_ 913 Rus Grant Matching Expense 59,000 .5,000 (54,000_ . 99,0 West Vaii Interchange Improvement .-170,000 55,000 {1'15,000. 553 Drainage Improvements 43,086 30,000 {13,086 746 P91ice Department Space Expansion - 298,500 0 {298,Stm 804: VTC Community Improvements 58,549 30,000 .,.,.;;':::..(28;549 Street Fumitute Replacement 40,000 20,000 (20;000 989. Automate East Vail Interchange 9,900 0 {9 900 ..Town Manager Residence 40,000 30 000 ;10,000 Parking Structure. Landscape Contingency 26,312 2,784 {23 52$ Electric Raceway 8 Carpet ~ Library 35,000 0 (35,000 Shmetzco Berm 3,096 0 ::;>;{3:098 Bus Grant Lobbyist 50,000 10,000 >t40;000 Library Book Drop 4,800 1,050 ' {3,750 Bald Mountain Bus Stop 910,000 30,000 (80,000 , Vail Road Medians 122,478 0 {122,478 Subtotal Rolifonnrard Expenditures ~ 2,768,668, 1,225,573 X1,543;095 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 91;563,752 '10,049,659 {1:~6t:4u098 SURPLUSI{SHORTFAi.L1 > ' :.;(29;9291. ~ - - 2~TRFIN2 PAGE 4 12/07/93 'l993 ; 9993 VARIANCE . ' REAL ESTATE.TRANSFER TAX ;BUDGET:: ESTIMATE .OVEW~UNDER REVENUE RETT Taxes 1,200,000 1,900,000 <;?:»::700,000, Golf Course Lease/VRD 85,000 83,000 >;!;:(2. ,000 Recreation Amenities Fees 30,000 88,000 ;''_'>`58,000. Lottery Revenue 92,000 12,000 .;:;::;;;.;;.:;:.:;<0; Misc. Reimbursements for Projects 48,777 :48;777; :<D: ~Eamings on Investments 65,000 65,000 TOTAL REVENUE . " 1;392:000 ;:2<196;777 804777 . EXPENDITURES Purchase of Open Space 340,432 340,432 D Loan Repayment 929,743 929,743..`.; Miscellaneous 500 500 id 9,057 Ski Museum Park SRe 128,375 128,375 D. 9,062 Gore Creek Promenade 85,780 85,780 _ : j' 0:: 9,065 Stephens Park Phase II 100,208 107,882 :;::,;;;;;;,;;;,;,;7,674. 9,068. _ Dowd Junction Bike Path Design 140,309 140,309 0; 9,070 Spraddle Creek Parcel Purchase ~ 483,656 500,666 „,1,010 9,074 Master Open Space/ Rec Trail Plan 60,000 60,000 0 9,05 Alpine Gardens Contribution 25,000 25,000 0; 9,081 Palk Maintenance 129,353 129,353 0: 9,082 Rec Path Maintenance 91,400 91,400 ; 0" Purchase of land Lionsridge 49,986 49,986 ._::::s;;;:::;;::::;::0. Projects to be Rolled into 1994 9,051 ~Bighom Park Completion 19,152 9,000 (10;152 9,058 Vail Trail Safety 2,200 0 :;<<`i`:;,;:(2,200 9,067 West Vaii Bike Path 200,160 100,000 ('100,:160 9,079 Frontage Road Bike Path 144,966 2,000 <; 042;966 9,0.84 Sandstone Park Improvement 26,526 10,000 #16,526 _ 9,085 Dowd Junction Land Improvement 8,745 1,000 '(7,745 9,086 TOT Lot Access Paths 9,971 0 '(9,971 9,087 Pirate Ship Park 42,504 1,000 `;(44;504 9,089 Ford Park Stainiway 32,250 3,000 #29,250- 9,090 ~ Mill Creek /Ted Kindel Park 105,140 5,000 s (100;140 East Vail Interchange Landscaping 84,149 65,000 (19,149 Subtotal Rollforward Expenditures 675,763 196,000 i' ' 1:!.;:::(479,763 (959,526 TOTALRETl` EXPENDITURESs 3,240;505 2,ZB5,426 :_(455,079 r; SURPLUSI(SHORTFALI,.} ' : ; (58B,649a' ! <,4993 19 3. ;:V 1ANC ; HEAVY EQUIPMENT FUND: ; ` BUDGET ;ESTIMATE :`OVERISIJNDEf2 REVENUE 1,485,864 1,535,864 `1:;:;;1:;;;1:;;:;50;000 ' EXPENDITURES 1,450,397 1447,502 X2,$95, ::SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) : ; . ,:.:.....':;88,362 2®TRFIN2 PAGE 5 12/07/93 \ - - ~ ' - .:.:1893.:°: X893, VARIANCE. SPECIAL PARKING ASSESSMENT>fUND BUDGET....... ESTIMATE .:OVER!{UNDER; REVENUE Parking Assessments. 20,000 56,500 36,500. ' Daily Parking Revenue 257,500 245,050 X12;450 . .Eamings on Investments 4,500 4,500 <:>>:0 TOTAL<$PAF: REVENUE ; ::282:000 < ::.306.050 <; 24050 EXPENDITURES Transfer to Debt SeMce Fund 309,000 308,281 (719 „ OTALSPAFEXPENDITURES ;.:.,:.::09,000. :;::308,281 (7.19 : ~ f .231' :VARIANCE: , MARKETING FUNC~ BUDGET .:;.;.:ESTIMATE <OVER[(UNDER . REVENUE Business Ucenses .345,000 350,000 ,..:.!:*~,000 . TOV Marketing Fund 160,500 178,769. ;,;,'18,269 Other Marketing Contributions 155,000 174,000 18,000; . . Eamings on Investmenrts 7,000 7,000 ;;!;:;:p ` TOTAL MARKETING REVENUE .:.:.:..::.::667:500. :749,769. 42,269 x:040 r4,ooo EXPENDITURES:: SURPLUSI(SHORTFALi):. :(11.231). - 1993:: 1993: VARIANCE ~POLICE'CONFISCATION FUND BUDGET ::..,:ESTIMATE : OVERl~UNDER REVENUE ' Confiscation Proceeds 10,000 10,000 '>:<`i```;! D. Eamings on Investments 16,000 16,000 0 OTALF'CF.REVENUE` :...::26.000 :26.000-` 0 EXPENDITURES 174,984 158,000 `;(,16,984 ~OTAL;PCF:>EXPENDITURES>, : >`:::174,984:::'::>::.:,: ;158 000.:::....:. {16.984 ~ .:SURP~U$/.aSHORTFALI.) ::(.132,D00) ; 20TRFIN2 PAGE 6 12/07/93 ~ ' 1993 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION ITEMS GENERAL FUND Town Officials: Bus Grant Lobbyist -Avon 1J0,620 Professional Fees -Town Manager Search 10,000• . Town Manager Replacement Costs 51,310 Cable ~TV Study (to be reimbursed) 20,718 Legal ~ Litigation Professional Fees 15.000' • Total 107,648 Administrative Services: Town Manager Recruitment 15,000_ Community Development AIPP Project 24,000 Library Contributions 54,837 Contributions & Others: Additional Marketing Contribution 11,000 Ride the Rockies 7,700. Workers Compensation & Unemployment Allocated to Other Funds - <24,413 > Reverse Previous Appropriation ~ <17,250 > • Total 76 522 PAGE 7 1993 SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION ITEMS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJE~ ~ Bus Grant Lobbyist 50,000 Relocate Checkpoint, Charlie <219,850 > Computer Oriented Irrigation System <100,000 > Bald Mountain Bus Stop 110,000 Vail Road Medians 122,478 Municipal Annex Rotl Forward 2,553 Reverse Duplicate. Supplemental -Loader <118,500 > Golf Course Maintenance Parcel Purchase 195,914 Gore Creek.Pedestrian Bridge Improvement 20,000 .West ,Vail Mudslide Mitigation (to be reimbursed 10,000 Stifer Fountain Repair 10,000 Library Book Drop 4,800 Town Manager Residence 40.Q00 Total Capital Projects Fund ~7 X95 Rt i i ,Land Purchase - Lionsridge 49,986 ' Ski Museum Park Reimbursement .29,000 _ bowd Junction Path Reimbursement 12,485 - - West .Vail Bike Path 50,014 _ Golf Course Maintenance Parcel Purchase <195,914 > Stephens Park Reimbursement 7.292 Total RC i i Fund 137 > _ HEF Worker's Compensation & Unemployment 21,092 Insurance Allocated to Fund Vehicle Body .Repair Expenditures 40.000 Total HEF Fund ~ Ri X92 i POLICE CONFISCATION FUND a Worker's Compensation & Unemployment ~ 1,530 Insurance Allocated to Fund a PAGE 8 A TOWN OF VAIL A COUNCIL CONTINGENCY 1993 . ~ Original Budget Amount $50,000 -:.Uses: Perfo~nance; and Conference Center Demand Analysis 15,000 ~Bonus.'Pey.,for 20 Year Employees 6,000 - ~ ~~~Proi"essonal Fees -Role pefning Town Council 8,000 .Contribution for.Trip $ Books, Pins for Soccer Club 1,000 Contribution - WE Recycle 4,000 :.,"~~:Contribution- Vail Religious Foundation 500 ~~:~~VA~ :TOV, Strategic Planning Sessions 5 000 , . Burke Donation . 200 Upgrade `Survey Process 2,000 . Shane Hanson -Donation 200 i/iola Montoya Memorial Fund 200 . Total`Amount Used ~ ~ 42,100 Total Amount Left $7,900 COUCON92 PAGE 9~. 12/06/93